thread_id
stringlengths
37
43
source_file
stringlengths
35
37
subject
stringlengths
0
231
messages
stringlengths
88
34.9k
message_count
int64
1
42
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032358.txt_15867
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032358.txt
RE:
[{"sender": "Miller, Michael", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:28:58 PM", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Miller, Michael"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016 4:55 PM", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-Donald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032948.txt_15872
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032948.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Tom Pritzker"], "timestamp": "12/18/2016 3:35:10 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://variety.com/2016/tv/news/alec-baldwin-donald-trump-john-goodman-saturday-night-live-1201944908/"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031747.txt_15882
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031747.txt
kerry scheme
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/31/2015 11:24:38 AM", "subject": "kerry scheme", "body": "he will get hillarty indicted, they will need a candidate at the last moment it will either be him or biden. he\nwon most states last time. biden has no money so kerry can buy him out of race."}]
1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029569.txt_15893
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029569.txt
Re: invitation
[{"sender": "Lisa New TE", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:52 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nHere is an invitation you can forward. Fingers crossed.\nI'm going upstairs to hunt for my copy of Lolita, or will get on my kindle and reread on our way to\n\nAustralia. I may have lent it to one of my kids. I would recommend reading My Antonia by Cather next\ntime you're on a long plane trip. The prose is gorgeous, and the book has-- come to think of it-- similar"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 11:05 AM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Needs edit. Start with id like you to join clinton ..eyc"}, {"sender": "Lisa New ____l", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "Jeffrey,\nHow's this"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "serena , bill clinon shaque and,,,,, have all on pbs. ? read poetry for children. I would love to have you\n\ndo the same........ blah blah blah do not say come on my show."}, {"sender": "Lisa New i", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:39 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "this poem about childbirth and is not for children.\nIt's for adults and it raises awareness on the issues of discrimination against women athletes in sports\nand, against women of color in childbirth. These are Serena's big issues now.\n\nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "sorry , that was meant as a filler what is important is that she is joining the others priority . and not\nappearing on your show. !:) invite you to appear is DOA"}, {"sender": "Lisa New <7 E", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 7:45 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": "can you give me a little bit of phrasing you think is optimal? I'm not sure I know how to ask her to join this\ncompany without asking her to be\n\npart of poetry in america. It does also seem to me perhaps relevant that Serena thinks of herself as a poetry\nperson.\n\nFor people who think that way, maybe not nothing (hasn't been nothing to others) that a Harvard poetry\nprofessor seeks her wisdom on the art form?\n\nWould really appreciate your edit.\nLisa"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Elisa New"], "timestamp": "11/25/2018 11:55:13 PM", "subject": "Re: invitation", "body": ""}]
8
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.txt_15901
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032370.txt
Re: Trump
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/14/2016 2:54:06 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "do you agree with my thesis?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:53 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no intel but lots of profits"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"}]
3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032974.txt_15907
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032974.txt
Re: production: 16db-stocks published
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "2/16/2017 2:03:54 AM", "subject": "Re: production: 16db-stocks published", "body": "thnks for sending"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:36 PM", "subject": "Re: production: 16db-stocks published", "body": "Channeling you! Maybe even the big guy gives it a read. What? This? From the failing NYT?\n\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Scoop Notifications <scoop-notifications@nytimes.com>", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "February 15, 2017 at 8:25:29 PM EST", "subject": "production: 16db-stocks published", "body": "Hi Landon Thomas Jr. -\n\n16db-stocks has been published.\n\nThe URL is: http://(www.nytimes.com/2017/02/15/business/dealbook/stock-market-investment-trump.html\n\nPlease consider sharing the article on social platforms.\n\nThank you!"}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032272.txt_15913
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032272.txt
RE:
[{"sender": "Miller, Michael", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "7/7/2016 1:04:06 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Thank you, Jeffrey. Mike"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Miller, Michael"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 07, 2016 8:12 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025649.txt_15921
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025649.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Steve Bannon\nto me\nFeb 24 (1 day ago)\nhttps://www.politico.com/story/2018/02/23/susan-rice-lawyer-obama-administration-classifled-intelligence-\nmichael-flynn-trump-423437 \ndo you think Bill Clinton would like to join you me ehud and steve.? could be very funny, all off the record."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <M1111>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:28 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "While he might like to, his lawyer would advise him against it. :-)\nAre you feeling better today?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "onlyu slightly, said ben giving her a very hard time, and did not know about tattoo"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Uh oh — You dimed out\nWhat is Benjamin upset about?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2018, at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "she said he wants her to do wife like things. ugh"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/25/2018 10:30:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Barf."}]
6
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023020.txt_15924
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023020.txt
Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial\nand the witness list which names i and other young women who allege they were underage\n\nvictims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their\nclaims.\n\nMsi further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and\ninstructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:38:16 PM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/18/2013 11:24:22 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033293.txt_15926
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033293.txt
Fw: media inquiry - Fox News
[{"sender": "Investigative Reporter, FoxNews.com", "recipients": ["Mr. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 27, 2016 12:47 PM", "subject": "media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Mr. Weinberg \nI was referred to you by Alan Dershowitz, who told me you're Jeffrey Epstein's attorney. \nIf this is the case, I was hoping to reach him through you to see if he'd be willing to speak on the record about \nhis ties - or previous ties - to both the Clintons and Donald Trump? \nWould you be able to arrange a call or email exchange this week? \nThanks for your consideration."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, May 06, 2016 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: media inquiry - Fox News", "body": "Just following up again in hopes of arranging a phone interview or email exchange. \nThanks for your consideration."}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/6/2016 7:52:09 PM", "subject": "Fw: media inquiry - Fox News", "body": ""}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026426.txt_15932
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026426.txt
Re: Ref. : TR:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 11:37:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Ref. : TR: ", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "Jean HUGUEN", "recipients": ["jeffrey"], "timestamp": "28/11/2016 10:01:14", "subject": "TR: ", "body": "Dear jeffrey \n\nFrom our side we could postponed the trip ,visit the 2 works from Plant Thursday the 15th and have our \nmeeting Friday the 16th all of us,but need an answer from Plant. \nPlease tell me if it is convenient for you Friday the 16th,or Thurday late afternoon \nThanks\njean"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["___________________________________________", "Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "lundi 28 novembre 2016 01:23", "subject": "Re: Ref. : TR: ", "body": "can you delay your trip one week, . trump related issues occupying my time. say 13 14 instead"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030244.txt_15937
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030244.txt
Re: we will be haying dinnr with him on sunday
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2011 10:14:55 PM", "subject": "Re: we will be haying dinnr with him on sunday", "body": "Bozhe Moi!! \nHope I'll handle my utensils:))"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 22, 2011 12:09 PM", "subject": "Re: we will be haying dinnr with him on sunday", "body": "Gergen went on to become the Director of Communications for President Gerald Ford and President Ronald \nReagan, a counselor on domestic and foreign affairs for President Bill Clinton and his Secretary of State, \nWarren Christopher, and an adviser to the 1980 George H.W. Bush presidential campaign."}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033129.txt_15955
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033129.txt
Re: Re:
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "10/5/2018 1:49:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "help yes no question FRAUD show me an inkling. ?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Finally read the nytimes piece closely....with all due respect | am guessing you are wrong in dismissing/trivializing it....seems there are some hard facts that are very difficult for the big guy to explain"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 04, 2018 11:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Maybe"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 11:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "But isn’t the disclosure that fred shtupped him with money versus his bullshit story of self-made hero valid and important?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 03, 2018 9:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im fair. and not his defender. but even the explanations on line were WAY wrong. and based on silliness of understandings."}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Had a gut that's where you would come out\n\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, October 3, 2018 7:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "fred gave him 15k as a3 year old only . however ( written 200k in \"todays dollars\" ) then they compound their silliness, stating that he was a millonair at age 8.? all silly, . if fred put 2k in treasuries the same year ,and didnt invest it it would be worth 1 million today. instead he invested in real estate. taxes on"}]
7
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029958.txt_15965
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029958.txt
| beat Bush
[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey Epstein [jevacations@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2016 1:15:33 PM", "subject": "| beat Bush", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n| got more votes than Jeb Bush got in lowa, and | only had one congressional district, he had four!! It’s so funny (to me —\ntotally embarrassing to him)!!! Still like Trump and might be a delegate to the republican convention.\n\nWas in St. Thomas for a couple of days — did call this island, but never heard back. Went scuba diving off St. Jeff and it\nwas beautiful. Would be totally funny (to me at least) if you put a big fake shark or statute under the water where the\ndivers go....\n\nLove ya,"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032827.txt_15966
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032827.txt
RE:
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, November 6, 2018 1:51 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Are you enjoying la? I liked your trump exaggerations not lies"}, {"sender": "Peter Thiel", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/7/2018 12:34:34 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Can't complain thus far..."}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033287.txt_15968
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033287.txt
Trump
[{"sender": "Stephen Alexander", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/7/2016 10:05:34 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "A pal from Trump's military school days came out in his defense. What the author failed to mention was Peter Ticktin's law license has been suspended twice since 2009 for unethical practice of law. Makes him the perfect \"character witness\" for The Donald, eh? Man Who Lived With Trump 50 Years Ago Drops Bombshell TRUTH... \"I Was Aghast\" Man Who Lived With Trump 50 Years Ago Drops Bombshell TRUTH... Donald Trump NEVER thought this was going to come out... View on conservativetribune.com Preview by Yahoo"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026354.txt_15971
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026354.txt
Re: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak
[{"sender": "Ehud Barak <1111>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 9:34 AM", "subject": "Re: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak", "body": "Hi Jeff\nBill Clinton 1994.\nFood for thought.\nEB"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Ehud Barak"], "timestamp": "4/23/2015 2:38:55 PM", "subject": "Re: What Iran nuke deal means for Israel: Ehud Barak", "body": "this is your interview not his"}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032551.txt_15972
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032551.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Thorbjén Jagland Po", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/10/2017 7:29:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In Norway. Next time, tell me well in advance, would be interesting to learn more more about Trump. Iam\ntotally confused."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "lor. 8. jul. 2017 kl. 15.22", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Iaminparis you?"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027062.txt_15979
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027062.txt
Re: My datebook
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff <EMMIIMMIIIMIM>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 9:37 PM", "subject": "Re: My datebook", "body": "Three hours with SB who believes DJT won't last to the mid terms. Also saw Brad Karp who is super menchy and offering much help on next book."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 1:49:52 AM", "subject": "Re: My datebook", "body": ""}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032579.txt_15989
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032579.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["[i]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": "[i]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["[i]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "[i]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food@"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["[i]"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/8/2017 9:48:25 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}]
6
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030868.txt_16003
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030868.txt
hey hey
[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/10/2017 3:43:30 PM", "subject": "hey hey", "body": "‘He doesn’t like this sh*t’: Trump\nreportedly hates his job and his staff after\nless than a month\n\nK\n\nTRAVIS GETTYS\n10 FEB 2017 AT 08:38 ET"}]
1
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019203.txt_16005
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019203.txt
Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America
[{"sender": "Lisa New ee", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/19/2016 4:36:41 AM", "subject": "Thank You from Lisa and Poetry in America", "body": "Dear\nJeffrey\n(and please see note at bottom),\n\nThis end-of-the-year letter is to catch you up on developments and to report progress made in 2016\nby Poetry in America, by its associated non-profit production company, Verse Video Education, and\nby (and with) our new Harvard partner, the Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning. Whether\nyou are a longstanding adviser and supporter of Poetry in America, or you’ve more recently joined our\ncircle of proponents, your contributions, thought partnership and enthusiasm have made this year’s\nsuccesses possible.\n\nLast fall, | knew this would be a crucial year. Goals for 2016 included moving our co-produced\ntelevision series, Poetry in America, toward a concrete release date (now entering post-production,\nwe launch nationwide in April 2018), converting our six HarvardX MOOC modules into for-credit\ncourses (now complete and being offered by Harvard’s Division of Continuing Education), and getting\nthe word out on our first course developed especially for K-12 educators, Poetry in America for\nTeachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop. With a mission of creating and distributing the highest-\nquality humanities content for a wide variety of learners, our projects now rely on a salaried\nproduction staff of five, a rotating corps of part timers and contractors, and a growing cohort of\nHarvard graduate students, undergraduates and interns whom we train in the public-facing\nhumanities. Growing fast, in 2016 we more firmly established Verse Video Education as a nimble and\nstable producer of humanities-based content (now including an archive of over 120 separate\ninterviews with distinguished discussants), while also defining a forward-looking partnership and\ngrowth strategy with Harvard. As 2016 draws to a close, | have much progress to report.\n\nVerse Video Education: Independent 501c3\n\nIn April 2016, Verse Video Education, the fledgling production company |’d founded in 2014, received\nIRS approval and became a 501c3. Now capable of accepting philanthropic contributions, Verse\nVideo Education has also begun to generate revenue by producing high-quality educational media for\nother institutions. Clients within our first year included Greenwich Country Day School, YIVO Institute\nfor Jewish Research, Schlesinger Library, Harvard Institute for Global Health, and Project Zero. While\nphilanthropic donations remain essential, work for clients allows us to amplify the impact of\nphilanthropic donations, not only permitting additional investment in our flagship partnerships with\nWGBH and Harvard, but also fostering development of new partnerships and projects. These include\na video series on poetry and science now running with award-winning magazine Nautilus, a\ncollaboration with distinguished poet Robert Pinsky and his Favorite Poem Project, and an expansion\nof our poetry film series with partners at The Nantucket Project. Advised by a stellar and diversely\ntalented board, Verse Video Education is looking toward sustainability. We are now discussing\ndistribution of new content with a variety of stakeholders, including media providers in China.\n\nNew Harvard Partner: Bok Center for Teaching and Learning\n\nMeanwhile, Poetry in America has deepened its partnership and formulated a plan for growth going\nforward at Harvard. This fall, Harvard's Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Mike Smith,"}]
1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029970.txt_16006
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029970.txt
RE: Hello!!!
[{"sender": "Gwendolyn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sunday, June 25, 2017 4:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello!!!", "body": "Great news\n\nHi Jeffrey,\n\nJust called, but not sure I have the right cell number for you. Thinking of you and hope life is treating you great! Any news?\n\nAll good here in the District of Corruption — I’m lovin’ Trump. He is turning this town on its head, and have to admit, I’m enjoying watching the action (except for the shooting, of course, which was tragic). Especially interesting is watching the Dems implode — I’m really shocked at how wrong they judged the public. Am having dinner tonight with one of the Blue Dog Dems, and think they could maneuver to take over the party — Rep. Jim Costa is the defacto head — we’ll see. Have popcorn, sitting back and watching the show\n\nJust got a big promotion to Manager of Senior Health, Virginia Hospital Center/Mayo Clinic. Am very excited, and love the job — it is so rewarding. I spend most of my time giving lectures on neurodegenerative diseases, sleep, heart health and strategies for longevity. And the rest of the time as liaison to State and local Department’s of Aging, facilitator to the Alzheimer and Dementia Caregiver Support Group and managing the assistive technology program.\n\nIf you hear of any special panels or commissions President Trump is forming, please keep me in mind. Sure the hospital won’t mind loaning me out, and pretty sure I’m one of a handful of Republican Gerontologists.\n\nLet me know if you get to DC. Would LOVE to see you!!!\n\nMiss you and all the great times we had xxxx\nGwendolyn\n\nPS. How are Fred and Mort doing?"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "6/25/2017 9:10:33 PM", "subject": "RE: Hello!!!", "body": "Thanks!!!"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031172.txt_16008
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031172.txt
Re: Front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!
[{"sender": "Cecile de Jongh", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:12 AM", "subject": "Re: Front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": "FYI\nhttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/29/obama-bundler-works-as-virgin-islands-tax-adviser/"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Cecile de Jongh"], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 1 2012 01:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!", "body": "whoops"}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033115.txt_16016
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033115.txt
Re: Smart analysis on big tech -- Apple section highlighted
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/17/2018 7:12:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Smart analysis on big tech -- Apple section highlighted", "body": "its the leader for the next years ."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Smart analysis on big tech -- Apple section highlighted", "body": "China's big tech stocks have fallen into a bear\nmarket at the same time that regulatory threats\nagainst U.S. big tech companies are gaining\nmomentum. Can U.S. big tech stocks soldier on\nalone or is this a harbinger that the group as a whole\nis losing its tremendous leadership position?\n\nSep 13, 2018\nTechnology & Security\nTech Backlash\n\nSave Article\n\nDownload PDF\n\nbig-tech-backlash\n\nIn recent months, China’s BAT collapse has demonstrated how costly the expectation of\ninvincibility can be—Baidu, Alibaba, and Tencent are all down more than 24%\nfrom their year-to-date closing highs. Citigroup’s head of Asia strategy, Mohammed\nApabhai, told CNN an apt analogy about the investor sentiment that led to BAT’s collapse,\nlikening “the exuberance for tech stocks to the Looney Tunes cartoons in which Wile E.\nCoyote chases Road Runner over a cliff.” Given they’ve more or less moved in\ntandem for years, will FAANG follow the same path as BAT?\n\nThe BAT collapse was triggered by subpar earnings and a shifting regulatory environment\nin China. Facebook’s miss in 2Q18—which drove a $120 billion single-day market cap\nloss, the biggest ever for a U.S. company—showed how decisive a turn could be if more\nU.S. tech darlings stumble this quarter."}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022668.txt_16018
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022668.txt
Re: How are you holding up?
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Friday, January 16, 2015 7:45 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "I think the big issue is separating yourself from Andrew. I mean I can see why a statement might help in some way -- but its Andrew (not clinton and the rest) that is keeping the story alive. Until you are able to come forward and address that the story lives on. I mean in the end he had consensual sex with M. And Mworked for you. The rest is atmospherics. You have moved on! People don't know that and cant accept that unless you say as much.\nDoes franc drama worry you? Am writing on it now..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former girlfrend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned, or subpeonaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire Mitime she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers She never saw anything that =PM claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained, not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship, I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. ( no sex J. . they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, . . 8 . answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM", "subject": "Re: How are you holding up?", "body": "Landon Thomas, Jr.\nFinancial Reporter\nNew York Times\nhttp://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon%20jr%20thomas/index.html"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031614.txt_16031
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031614.txt
Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:37:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "here we go"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg <IMIMI>", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Reporter said 1994 claim fed ct California\nWill go to press in several hrs"}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["'Martin G. Weinberg'"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another man, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we want to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this behalf?\n\nMy number is and I'm available any time. I also just tried your cell phone.\n\nThank you in advance.\n\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\nReuters News\nThomson Reuters"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026368.txt_16033
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026368.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Gates"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, September 15 2015 11:40 AM", "subject": null, "body": "will you be around week of 28th for general assembly clinton week? in new york"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026383.txt_16035
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026383.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Raafat Alsabbagh"], "timestamp": "6/2/2016 10:21:17 AM", "subject": null, "body": "attached is a first draft, tell me what changes additions or modifications you suggest. I am happy you are returning so fast. If Mohammed really wants to see the future, after seeing the past in Washington with Obama, we should take him to see the Laboratory at MIT. advanced robotics. Artificial Intelligence etc."}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032628.txt_16058
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032628.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/20/2017 9:57:25 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today.. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in new york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032058.txt_16060
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032058.txt
Fwd: CNN Inquiry
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler TE Darren Indykc iy"], "timestamp": "10/13/2016 6:14:55 PM", "subject": "Fwd: CNN Inquiry", "body": "Not\nRose) interested"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["JEE <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Fwd: CNN Inquiry", "body": "Fyi\nSent from my iPhone"}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031545.txt_16066
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031545.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Friday, December 1, 2017 5:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what does the flyinn plea mean in the scheme of things"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/1/2017 5:42:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Beginning of the end...will say trump told him to go the russkies"}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030883.txt_16068
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030883.txt
Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times
[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/5/2018 2:09:16 AM", "subject": "Trump Is Said to Know of Stormy Daniels Payment Months Before He Denied It - The New York Times", "body": "https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/05/04/us/politics/trump-hush-payment-stormy-daniels.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage\n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030883"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031223.txt_16077
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031223.txt
Re: Program & Attendee list
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Barbro C Ehnbom"], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 20, 2012 2:32 pm", "subject": "Re: Program & Attendee list", "body": "who is you r wife choice this year?"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033244.txt_16082
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033244.txt
Peter Thiel Has Been Hedging His Bet On Donald Trump
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/7/2017 7:51:25 PM", "subject": "Peter Thiel Has Been Hedging His Bet On Donald Trump", "body": "https://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanmac/peter-thiel-and-donald-trump?utm term=.1vyllavykiwWNNok75"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032064.txt_16094
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032064.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmier", "Darren Indyke", "Viartin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 1:07:24 AM", "subject": null, "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030667.txt_16104
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030667.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number ?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed in san fran...at the airport...let's talk when | get settled..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Notice the date of the email"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And?"}]
6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029098.txt_16112
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029098.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Masha Drokova <mashadrokova@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 5:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Still waiting Nowak to respond about when he can call(I'll keep following up with him, not a prob) \nFound this looking for the details of what is happening with the federal budget for science \nhttp s ://www. congress . gov/c ongressional-rep ort/115th-congress/house-rep ort/231/1 \nHere's a list of outlets to approach about what you are going to bridge the funding gap: \n* MIT Technology Review \n* Nature \n* Washington Post \n* Science \n* Wall Street Journal \n* WIRED \nTopic to approach \nhttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-21/for-the-impact-of-trump-slashing-science-funding-look-\nnorth?utm content=politics&utm campaign=socialflow-\norganic&utm source=twitter&utm medium=social&cmpid%3D=socialflow-twitter-politics"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 25, 2017, at 1:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Progress?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 25, 2017, at 6:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Forwarded message"}, {"sender": "Nowak, Martin A.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/25/2017 12:57:37 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will talk to here this morning \nher Skype contact is in moscow. \nis this correct?"}]
4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033278.txt_16115
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033278.txt
Trump tariffs are in 'Stop, or I'll shoot myself in the foot' category: Ex-Treasury chief Summers
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/6/2018 9:20:51 PM", "subject": "Trump tariffs are in 'Stop, or I'll shoot myself in the foot' category: Ex-Treasury chief Summers", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/06/trump-tariff-threats-harming-us-ex-treasury-chief-larry-summers.html"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033240.txt_16122
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033240.txt
Fw: Close friend of Trump investigated over alleged €170m tax evasion I World news I The Guardian
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 7:51:52 PM", "subject": "Fw: Close friend of Trump investigated over alleged €170m tax evasion I World news I The Guardian", "body": "Bad news for TJB \nhttps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A www.theguardian.com world 2017 may 29 close-\n2Dfriend-2Dtrump-2Dthomas-2Dbarrack-2Dalleged-2Dtax-2Devasion-2Ditaly-2Dsardinia-3FCMP-3Dshare-\n5Fbtn-5Ffb&d=DQIFAg&c=euGZstcaTD1lvimEN8b7jXrwq0f-\nv5A CdpgnVfiiMM&r=qvsWPMySvJQKJyiCbbH3 UeJCrKMWih9KXDAwYE2eSw&m=HWy8k1H7mKJ 1 s \ny-3HdPAkCHdCOMhzGlxMC3 stl3GEg&s=F0WqhPv3Cj87MVTDCVx3sZahVmybNtdsoq3D V-5yAU&e="}]
1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029021.txt_16126
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029021.txt
interesting
[{"sender": "Alain Forget", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 11:12:27 AM", "subject": "interesting", "body": "Donald Trump’s newly named chief strategist and senior counselor, Steve Bannon, laid out his global nationalist vision in unusually in-depth remarks delivered by Skype to a conference held inside the Vatican in the summer of 2014.\n\nWell before victories for Brexit and Trump seemed possible, Bannon declared there was a “global tea party movement” and praised European far-right parties like Great Britain’s UKIP and France’s National Front. Bannon also suggested that a racist element in far-right parties “all gets kind of washed out,” that the West was facing a “crisis of capitalism” after losing its “Judeo-Christian foundation,” and he blasted “crony capitalists” in Washington for failing to prosecute bank executives over the financial crisis.\n\nThe remarks — beamed into a small conference room in a 15th-century marble palace in a secluded corner of the Vatican — were part of a 50-minute Q&A during a conference focused on poverty hosted by the Human Dignity Institute, which BuzzFeed News attended as part of its coverage of the rise of Europe’s religious right. The group was founded by Benjamin Harnwell, a longtime aide to Conservative member of the European Parliament Nirj Deva to promote a “Christian voice” in European politics. The group has ties to some of the most conservative factions inside the Catholic\n\nChurch; Cardinal Raymond Burke, one of the most vocal critics of Pope Francis who was ousted from a senior Vatican position in 2014, is chair of the group’s advisory board. BuzzFeed News originally posted a transcript beginning 90 seconds into the then-Breitbart News chairman’s remarks because microphone placement made the opening mostly unintelligible, but we have completed the transcript from a video of the talk on YouTube. You can hear the whole recording at the bottom of the post.\n\nHere ts what he said, unedited:\n\nSteve Bannon: Thank you very much Benjamin, and I appreciate you guys including us\n\nin this. We’re speaking from Los Angeles today, right across the street from our"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026393.txt_16127
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026393.txt
Re: Mechanisms for learning
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joscha Bach"], "timestamp": "7/23/2016 8:41:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "gender differenece. unlikely motivational, every cell is different. size is didfferent. . \nthe more radical idea is that brains are the nucleus of the human\" cell: the body the membrane, the \norganizm the colletcions and interactions of brains, wisdom of crowds . mirroring. etc. . money used \nas signals. as is spoken language. . what does social behavior mean, it is the cooridiation of indiv brains. = \nI think that mathematics based thinking does not allow for censorship. money people concepts if they are \nall math , then poliiical correctness and their structures are only subsets of a larger group of thoughts. its not \nemotinal for me."}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 3:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Some thoughts I meant to send back for a long time: \n\nno worry, if i understand correctly you are suggsting there are layers 1 through N . lets cal them L 1 - \nLn. there are times T 1- Tn / and then conjecture that changing the time . correlations ( by genetic swtch or \nother method. , you might be able to make blacks smarter by changing the time for motor layer \ndevelopment and changing the time for other layers. . ). like telemeres for the cell , are their equivalents for \nthe layers. . as you talked about culling the unused neurons in each layer, each neuron in each layer would get \ndfferent ( kill yourself if you are not being used instructions ). \n\nExactly. I looked up the statistics, black kids in the US have slower cognitive development (and never catch \nup), which the study of course attributed to social factors without any evidence, and they had faster motor \ndevelopment! I suspect this means their brains are slower at learning high-level concepts, because the low-\nlevel structures are optimized for a shorter time. But they will keep the lead in motor development, because it \nis easier to learn, and they have more time and attention to practice once they get the structures in place. \nIt could also be that they have an additional set of learning directives in place that adapts them better to a more \nhunting/running style of life, whereas the Europeans had to adapt for identifying long-term seasonal patterns, \ndelayed gratification for agriculture etc. \n\nand CONCEPTS could be layer to layer communicaiton. . are gender differences also a matter of time , and \nstructure of interactions. . \n\nI suspect gender differences are mostly motivational, i.e. we have a reward system for all the different social \nand cognitive needs, which makes us receive different kinds of pleasure and pain, thereby pay attention and \nlearn. You cannot learn what does not attract your attention. Women tend to find abstract systems, conflicts \nand mechanisms intrinsically boring. Most women in computer science do not write programs because they \nenjoy solving puzzles, but because they want to help people, get approval etc. There are almost no women in \nmath, because it does not help people or yield social attention. \n\nMen tend to find elaborate social relations boring. If there is no pleasure in observing and empathizing with \npeople, one will not have good social cognition. \n\nIQ is not the only meaningful difference. Chinese pay an inordinate amount of attention to authority. I suspect \nhistorically., the authorities tended to kill them a lot if they did not. Jews tend be intellectually independent and \nanti-authoritarian, which might make them creative and inventive in ways that are hard to find in Asia. \n\nAt the moment, I think speed/quality of brain development plus motivational system are the key to \nunderstanding both mind and individual differences. Important part of human language might be the result in a \nmotivational need to discover/invent grammatical structure, which as a side effect makes us interested in \nmusic. \n\nIt would mean that Chomsky's life long hypothesis, that people have a special circuit for grammatical \nlanguage, is wrong. They might be GENERAL learners, just like Gorillas, but with a strong motivational urge \nto build grammatical structure, which the brain simply invents (there are only a few ways in which a natural \nlanguage can work). That is much easier to wire into a brain than a specific circuit. \n\ni my self believe that african music, westrn music , chinese music are a window into the the structure of those \nlayers. . western rigid, african primitve , chinese nature based, . I belive that synphoic movments best \ndescribe your layering, they open with a basic simple melody„ after it is learned, it is repeated and\" \ndeveloped\" , inverted, distorted, related, etc. the development stage take a long time. then there is a \nrecapitlaltion of the whole. and its inter and intra actions. . african musci has lots of beats. and little \ndevelopment. - no accident, it mirrors their learning process. \n\nInteresting question if music is somehow indicative of genetically defined prefs, but I am not sure. It could be \npath effects, starting in culture. \n\nre taboo \n, maybe climate change is a good way of dealing with overpopulation. . the earths forest fire. potentailly \na good thing for the species \n\nMaking having children expensive in terms of upbringing and missed opportunity (like in the west) is a more \nhumane way. Environmental stress while leaving near rock bottom tends to lead people to have more children, \nbecause there is no missed opportunity, and high mortality requires more attempts at procreation. Humans are a \nhardy species, outside of focused famine events and wars only small fractions of any given population die. \n\nI suspect that strong reductions in population will come from large-scale failure of agriculture. The climate \nchange itself with result in migration and wars, but most people will probably survive that. But who knows, I \nmight be wrong. \n\ntoo many people, so many mass executions of the elderly and infirm make sense \nis the fundamental fact that everyone dies at some time .make it imporrisbole to ask so why not earilier. if \nthe brain discards unused neurons, why shold socieity keep their equivalent \n\nThe radical idea of treating individuals in a society as cells and the society itself as a well-organized organism \nis fascism, or course. Probably the most efficient and rationally stringent way of governance, if someone could \npull it off in a sustainable way; and if it is aggressive and expansive, its efficiency makes it a virus that \neverybody will want to stomp out. Fascism makes romantic doo-gooders like me very uncomfortable (I visited \nKZ Buchenwald five times and it had a profound influence on me; we East Germans inoculated ourselves very \nthoroughly against fascism), and the general public will not be willing to consider it. \n\nI rather like the treatment Fascism gets in the Amazon Series \"The Man in the High Castle\", which explores \nwhat would have happened if the Germans and Japanese had won the war: A society that tries to function as a \nbrutal and ruthlessly efficient machine, eliminating all social and evolutionary slack. It is very dark, but not a \nflat caricature of pointless evil for its own sake. Heinlein's late book \"Starship Troopers\" explores fascism, too, \nbut unlike Philipp K Dick he does not see it as a form of insanity, but as the most desirable order. \n\nI find your \"political incorrectness\" very fascinating. In the beginning, I thought it is a form of costly signaling, \nbut now I think you are simply entirely unconstrained in your thoughts. How did you manage in your youth? \nDid you get in trouble, or did you keep your thoughts to yourself? I wonder what kind of person you want to \ntransform into. \n\nIt was interesting to notice that at the Forbidden Research conference, nobody managed to say anything \nremotely out-of line. One large discussion group wanted to address the question of whether \"democracy still \nworks\", and mostly expressed their disagreement with Trump. Ideology is like halitosis: easy to see in others, \nhard in oneself A speaker felt that the media \"stifle all criticism of Trump\", another wanted to remove \"men \nand Elon Musk from government\", and everybody strongly agreed that we need more diversity everywhere. \n\nI noticed some time ago that Joi has remarkable public communication skills. He picks controversial, insight-\nladen topics, but sanitizes them by carefully replacing the parts of content that would divide his audience with \nsymbolic messages that everybody can fill with their own content in a way that resonates with them. The non-\ncontroversial parts will still be insightful. He manages to come across as very subversive, while rarely \noffending anyone (except the hard scientists, that miss hard substance). \n\nHe also asks influential people and smart students or faculty to write parts of his essays and speeches for him. \nThis invests them in his success, especially because he is going to reward and acknowledge them. Very few of \nhis ideas are original, instead he is good at identifying and testing thoughts he reads or hears from others. \n\nI am still beset by the ruinous instinct that the goal of communication ought to be mutual understanding. Joi is \nright. Public communication is about reaching one's goals. \n\nBests, \nJoscha"}, {"sender": "Joscha Bach", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:42 AM", "subject": "Re: Mechanisms for learning", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \n\nthank you for your support and encouragement, even where I fail. \n\nSorry for being such an embarrassment today. I will spell out today's argument a bit better and cohesive when \nI get to it. Also, I should have recognized that the main point I tried to make would trigger Noam (who was as \nalways very generous, patient, kind and humble on the personal level, even though he did not feel like \nconceding anything on the conceptual one). Almost all of Noam's work focused on the idea that humans have \nvery specific circuits or modules (even when most people in his field began to have other ideas), and his \nfrustration is that it is so hard to find or explain them. \n\nI found Noam's hypothesis very compelling in the past. I still think that the idea that language is somehow a \ncultural or social invention of our species is wrong. But I think that there is a chance (we don't know that, but \nit seems to most promising hypothesis IMHO) that the difference between humans and apes is not a very \nintricate special circuit, but genetically simple developmental switches. The bootstrapping of cognition works \nlayer by layer during the first 20 years of our life. Each layer takes between a few months and a few years to \ntrain in humans. While a layer is learned, there is not much going on in the higher layers yet, and after the low \nlevel learning is finished, it does not change very much. This leads to the characteristic bursts in child \ndevelopment, that have famously been described by Piaget. \n\nThe first few layers are simple perceptual stuff, the last ones learn social structure and self-in-society. The \nswitching works with something like a genetic clock, very slowly in humans, but much more quickly in other \napes, and very fast in small mammals. As a result, human children take nine months before their brains are \nmature enough to crawl, and more than a year before they can walk. Many African populations are quite a bit \nfasters. In the US, black children outperform white children in motor development, even in very poor and \nsocially disadvantaged households, but they lag behind (and never catch up) in cognitive development even \nafter controlling for family income. \n\nGorillas can crawl after 2 months, and build their own nests after 2.5 years. They leave their mothers at 3-4 \nyears. Human children are pretty much useless during the first 10-12 years, but during each phase, their brains \nhave the opportunity to encounter many times as much training data as a gorilla brain. Humans are literally \nsmarter on every level, and because the abilities of the higher levels depend on those of the lower levels, they \ncan perform abstractions that mature gorillas will never learn, no matter how much we try to train them. \n\nThe second set of mechanisms is in the motivational system. Motivation tells the brain what to pay attention \nto, by giving reward and punishment. If a brain does not get much reward for solving puzzles, the individual \nwill find mathematics very boring and won't learn much of it. If a brain gets lots of rewards for discovering \nother people's intentions, it will learn a lot of social cognition. \n\nLanguage might be the result of three things that are different in humans: \n- extended training periods per layer (after the respective layer is done, it is difficult to learn a new set of \nphonemes or the first language) \n- more layers \n- different internal rewards. Perhaps the reward for learning grammatical structure is the same that makes us \nlike music. Our brains may enjoy learning compositional regular structure, and they enjoy making themselves \nunderstood, and everything else is something the universal cortical learning figures out on its own. \n\nThis is a hypothesis that is shared by a growing number of people these days. In humans, it is reflected for \ninstance by the fact that races with faster motor development have lower IQ. (In individuals of the same \ngroup, slower development often indicates defects, of course.) \n\nAnother support comes from machine learning: we find that the same learning functions can learn visual and \nauditory pattern recognition, and even end-to-end-learning. Google has built automatic image recognition into \ntheir current photo app: \nhttp://blogs.wsj . com/digits/2015/07/01/go o gle-mistakenly-tags-black-p eop le-as-gorillas-showing-limits-o f-\nalgorithms/ \n\nThe state of the art in research can do better than that: it can begin to \"imagine\" things. I.e. when the \nexperimenter asks the system to \"dream\" what a certain object looks like, the system can produce a somewhat \ncompelling image, which indicates that it is indeed learning visual structure. This stuff is something nobody \ncould do a few months ago: \nhttp://www.creativeai.net/posts/Mv4WG6rdzAerZF7ch/synthesizing-preferred-inputs-via-deep-generator-\nnetworks \n\nA machine learning program that can learn how to play an Atari game without any human supervision or \nhand-crafted engineering (the feat that gave DeepMind 500M from Google) now just takes about 130 lines of \nPython code. \n\nThese models do not have interesting motivational systems, and a relatively simple architecture. They \ncurrently seem to mimic some of the stuff that goes on in the first few layers of the cortex. They learn object \nfeatures, visual styles, lighting and rotation in 3d, and simple action policies. Almost everything else is \nmissing. But there is a lot of enthusiasm that the field might be on the right track, and that we can learn motor \nsimulations and intuitive physics soon. (The majority of the people in Al do not work on this, however. They \ntry to improve the performance for the current benchmarks.) \n\nNoam's criticism of machine translation mostly applies to the Latent Semantic Analysis models that Google \nand others have been using for many years. These models map linguistic symbols to concepts, and relate \nconcepts to each other, but they do not relate the concepts to \"proper\" mental representations of what objects \nand processes look like and how they interact. Concepts are probably one of the top layers of the learning \nhierarchy, i.e. they are acquired *after* we learn to simulate a mental world, not before. Classical linguists \nignored the simulation of a mental world entirely. \n\nIt seems miraculous that purely conceptual machine translation works at all, but that is because concepts are \nshared between speakers, so the structure of the conceptual space can be inferred from the statistics of \nlanguage use. But the statistics of language use have too little information to infer what objects look like and \nhow they interact. \n\nMy own original ideas concern a few parts of the emerging understanding of what the brain does. The \n\"request-confirmation networks\" that I have introduced at a NIPS workshop in last the December are an \nattempt at modeling how the higher layers might self-organize into cognitive programs. \n\nCheers! \nJoscha"}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031227.txt_16128
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031227.txt
RE: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN
[{"sender": "Bennet", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "7/13/2016 6:02:16 PM", "subject": "RE: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "H\n(bese reece tener teres renee teres renee ene ec ree Beer Tee Tees Tee eR eS BE BTS ee ee ee RN TE ee Tee ee ee tee ter terres\n\nRegards,\nBennet"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein", "Moskowitz, Bennet J."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 13, 2016 9:37 AM", "subject": "Fwd: JUDGE SWEET ALLOWING STEVEN HOFFENBERG TO TALK WITH THE TOWERS VICTIMS TO EXPLAIN THE VICTIMS SUIT FILING AGAINST JEFF EPSTEIN", "body": "Begin forwarded message:\n\nHOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031227"}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031541.txt_16140
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031541.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:44 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "S|"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, July 25, 2017 9:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "If trump fires mueller and gets away with it it is 1933 berlin"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 26, 2017 7:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/at-ohio-campaign-rally-trump-offers-an-unfiltered-view-of-his-presidency/2017/07/25/dbbf6792-7188-11e7-8839-ec48ec4cae25_story.html?utm_term=.37ed1a334d20"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do you know if your boy barrack is close witha lebanese/nigerian biz guy named chagoury?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 26, 2017 12:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I don't but with details can ask"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/26/2017 3:12:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Chagoury about to get indicted in l.a....wants me to rep him...supposed to be close to your guy"}]
7
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016596.txt_16142
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016596.txt
ARCOM
[{"sender": "John Page/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Kirk Blouin/PalmBeach@PalmBeach"], "timestamp": "06/26/2008 09:00 AM", "subject": "ARCOM", "body": "Kirk: We had our June monthly ARCOM meeting yesterday. You likely know that ARCOM is working with Mr. Trump to re-install a hedge on his North County Road property. I believe this case is now pending in front of Code Enforcement. In May, ARCOM approved a plan to replace the former hedge with silver buttonwood shrubbery, which would additionally be back-planted with silver buttonwood trees....the overall effect would be an eventual 20' high screen. The shrubs have been planted, but yesterday attorney Ray Royce asked for postponing the trees until the end of the Hurricane season. ARCOM said NO and directed the attorney and landscaper to get the trees in ASAP. Also, more shrubbery was required at the main entry (north side) to match the newly installed hedge on the south side.\n\nAs the meeting was ending, the Commissioners asked for one of two things. They asked that either 1) a quick written report from Code Enforcement be made available to them at their next meeting on July 23 (9:00 a.m.) about the enforcement status of the case, or 2) that someone from Code Enforcement attend their meeting to provide a verbal status report. Their patience is wearing thin with the whole hedge issue, and it has them naturally curious about what is happening with their counterparts on Code Enforcement.\n\nWould you or the appropriate representative from Code Enforcement be available on July 23? That would be my preference because follow-up questions almost always pop up. If not, can you provide me with a brief summary of your enforcement history and pending status? Thanks, JP"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030887.txt_16143
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030887.txt
RE: Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@qmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (boC3)"], "timestamp": "Friday, January 28, 2011 7:35 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "I can find out if mick jagger, ken starr, clinton . julie taymor , are in town/? I suggest we leave it till mon night.. I will have no trouble getting anyone you want . but 1 think it best after the three of us noodle a bit/."}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 30, 2011 6:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed to Iga.\n\nAre you in?\n\nIs it 7:30pm tmr ok? | will come w bill at that time. Pls let me know.\nb"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic (boC3)"], "timestamp": "Sunday, January 30, 2011 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, would you like to come by, or are youyou as jetlagged as me,, sultan just left. I will be up for another hour or so.. yes 730 tomorrow is great"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic (bgC3)", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/30/2011 11:39:47 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Thank you man. Want to go and take a shower!\nWorked most of fight.\n\nLets plan rather to meet tmr.\n\nLets talk tmr.\n\nGreat for 7:30! It will be fun.\n\nb"}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031189.txt_16144
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031189.txt
January 20, 2017
[{"sender": "Barbro Ehnbom", "recipients": ["JEEVACATION@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/20/2017 10:55:49 PM", "subject": "January 20, 2017", "body": "Dearest Jeffrey, \nHAPPY HAPPY HAPPY HAPPY!!! \nAND, YOUR BIRTHDAY PRESENT IS.....PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP!! HA HA! \nBE for your BBB!"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032048.txt_16148
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032048.txt
null
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "4/12/2014 11:24:06 AM", "subject": null, "body": "These conspiracy theories are an aberration and an insult to the memory of the crash victims, including the late\nPresident himself. As a Pole who is at least somewhat aware of the politics and economics of Poland, and a\njournalist who follows world politics and news developments daily, I am severely disappointed at the number of\npeople that are flocking to these conspiracy theories, and academics and professionals who propagate such ideas\nshould themselves feel ashamed.\n\nFirstly, there is absolutely no proof that there was any sabotage or subterfuge by either the Russians or the\nPrime Minister's political allies. Such accusations, then, without presenting any credible evidence, are\nslanderous.\n\nAlso, there would be no political or diplomatic capital gained by either of the \"accused\"... there would be little\nfor the Russian government to gain - it would be a huge diplomatic embarrassment for the Russian government\nto be found guilty of essentially assassinating a head of state. Kaczynski was one of the strongest allies of the\nU.S. among European leaders, and even Russia with its assertive diplomatic policies would not risk a complete\nbreakdown with the U.S. by killing a close ally. International condemnation would also follow, and the\nPresident - perhaps even the Prime Minister - would have to resign and wave good-bye to any political career in\nthe foreseeable future. Yes, \"even in Russia.\"\n\nSimilarly, for the Prime Minister's party, if he were actually complicit in the crash, that would mean he - or his\nallies - committed a coup d'etat. Also, there will be early presidential elections in June, which might actually go\nin favor of the President's party because of a sympathy vote. The \"acting\" Presidency is in the hands of his party\nfor only two months... so, again, the Prime Minister and his allies have nothing to gain and potentially\neverything to lose in the June vote.\n\nConspiracy-monging cheapens a national tragedy\n\nPolitical profit or loss questions aside, however, the conspiracy-monging seems to be taken as a way to discover\nwho's responsible for the tragedy and thus somehow bring them justice. However, it is not a healthy way to deal\nwith the tragedy. It is not conducive to national or personal healing. Furthermore, it disgraces and taints the\nmemory of those who died.\n\nIt only cheapens the tragedy and, sadly, may foreshadow what's to come in the coming presidential campaign -\nthe tragedy may be used by certain groups or individuals to propagate their own agenda and assume the\npresidency.\n\nIt is not so different than what has been going on in the U.S., with the \"birthers\" claiming Barack Obama is not\nlegally the President because he is not actually a citizen, or even natural-born citizen. Not as morbid, of course,\nbut still, in my honest opinion, ridiculous.\n\nBaseless, nonsensical conspiracies simply destroys the abiltiy of the nation and people of Poland to move on\nand honor the memory of those lost, and cheapens the tragedy that has been felt by Poles as far away as Chicago"}]
1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030216.txt_16149
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030216.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "2/7/2017 7:18:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what would you do in order to consolidate the movement. . music. icons. personalites. etc? did you get\nyour first installment. ? did you send the poster"}, {"sender": "paul krassner <i>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "My friend Aluna, a young comedian, was here with him most nights. Irwin used to say he will live to 147.\nAlana explained that 102 is 147 in comedian years."}, {"sender": "James Drougas", "recipients": ["Paul"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re:", "body": "Hi Paul. I've been spending lots of time with Irwin Corey and his family past two weeks especially. He\nwas in hospital until the last week and then He died a few hours ago peacefully at home in bed. Last night he\ntold me Trump will be assassinated soon. He was eager to learn the news each day. I asked him if he would\njoin the anti Trump rallies when he gains strength. Doctors thought he might live many months. Alas he was\nlaughing and smiling till the end and frowning about Trump.\n\nWarm and loving regards\n\nJim Drougas"}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031555.txt_16159
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031555.txt
Re: hicks
[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/15/2018 10:41:00 PM", "subject": "Re: hicks", "body": "So the florida shooter always wore a trump hat and was looking to kill Jews and women"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 15, 2018 2:55 PM", "subject": "hicks", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Sidney Blumenthal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2018 2:08", "subject": "Re: hicks", "body": "https://blindgossip.com/?p=89824"}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030893.txt_16162
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030893.txt
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Saturday, April 02, 2011 6:09 PM", "subject": "", "body": "in paris,, emailed steve - no response yet,, you wanted me to meet someone here, I forgot who. . may 2 will be aneye opener . I read the vanity fair piece. .\nhttp://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2011-04-01/bill-clinton-katie-couric-woody-allen-jeffrey-\nepsteins-society-friends-close-ranks/2/"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 10:40 PM", "subject": "", "body": "I will email Steve and Lawerence.\nIam curious what you think about Vanity fair piece?\n\nHow the daily beast knows about that dinner with woody allen and the crew?\n\nWho would know that? Some of your employees?\nB"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "", "body": "has a big mouth.-- wasn't there a science person or someone that worked with consuelo that you thought\nintersting?"}]
3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032582.txt_16164
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032582.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "your man did well . congragulations"}, {"sender": "Po", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf .. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "i otc", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "[iE", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy . He would like to take all the credit . If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 3:31:28 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i will be in new york from tuesday sep 12 for a week.. let me know the date and time to meet you if you there"}]
9
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031233.txt_16165
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031233.txt
Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
[{"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 2:14:35 AM", "subject": "Fwd: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "OK.. Here it is... suggestions?\n\n1. Item 1: I did neck with that woman, but never forced myself on her, and we talked about kissing or going\nbeyond that and decided not to.\n\n2. Item 2: This was what I told you about.. A student who came to me for advice about science\ncommunication.. I never approached her, or did anything, and have emails rebuffing her requests to meet off\ncampus for coffee or meals.. not because they were suggestive, but because I didn’t think it was appropriate. I\ndid ask her about being a female in a male dominated physics major group because I wanted to find out what\nproblems might be occurring. Iwas respectful of her, and in fact my wife and I gave her a lift later ata AAAS\nmeeting that I had helped get her a fellowship to attend. I was shocked later to learn that she had\n\ncomplained. There was no official investigation.. no formal complaint lodged.. When I spoke to the Dean and\ntold her the above, including showing emails, it was agreed that there would be no formal complaint but\nbecause the student had been upset I would not interact with her at all. I was shocked and dismayed, as I had\nworked very hard to be supportive and mentor this girl\n\n3. Item 3: I have no idea about this.\n\n4. This never happened.. In March 2008 at the convention I was approached by a student who did ask to sit at a\ntable with the then executive director of the Dawkins foundation. She asked me to join her in the hot tub. I said\nnow. Afterwards the exec. director informed me that this person was complaining that I had harassed her, and\nshe told me as she was there at the time she would be more than happy to explain that it was quite the opposite.\n\n5. This was a cruise with Nancy, who was my female companion. When that report appeared I explained that\nmy wife Nancy was upset at the allegation as she was my companion and such a complaint could be considered\nlibelous. the complaint was removed from the bloggers web site. Moreover, CFI not only continued to invite\nme on cruises but to speak at their events, including this year, where they have strict harassment policies. I\ncontinue to receive letters of thanks from them for my contributions, attitude, graciousness etc.. No complaints\never. Not one!\n\n6. This one you know about.\nShall we talk?\nLMK"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027099.txt_16167
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027099.txt
Re: How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli Rift
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "8/27/2012 11:05:23 AM", "subject": "Re: How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli Rift", "body": "http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j00NtuA2fbH1hED38qZkrNKc6VJw?docId=CNG.15\n8e059567cc64e99373df644f3134b3.01"}, {"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:22 AM", "subject": "Re: How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli Rift", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Esneh", "recipients": ["Esneh"], "timestamp": "August 27, 2012 9:23:47 AM GMT+01:00", "subject": "How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli Rift", "body": "Israel Policy Forum\nOn Iran: How to Repair the Widening American-Israeli Rift\nEphraim Sneh\nThe Islamist takeover in the Middle East and North Africa has created perilous strategic\nturbulence in the region. Consequently, it is now critically important that the United States and\nits few allies cooperate closely. Unfortunately, this has not been the case in recent weeks for US-\nIsrael relations regarding Iran's nuclear program. The disagreement about attacking Iran's\nuclear facilities has turned into ugly bickering, much of it disguised. This is harmful for both\nIsrael and the United States.\nTo heal this rift — which is necessary to effectively address the Iranian threat — we must\nunderstand the following basic facts:\n1. The Israeli fear of a nuclear Iran is genuine. It is not a political trick of Prime Minister\nBenjamin Netanyahu or Defense Minister Ehud Barak. A nuclear Iran would bolster and\nencourage extremist militant forces across the region. The moderates would be discouraged,\nintimidated and invariably weakened to the point where they would be unable to negotiate with\nIsrael. In just a few years, Israel will be surrounded by three Pakistan-like' countries: Saudi\nArabia, Egypt and Turkey. All three would possess nuclear weapons and be dominated\npolitically by Islamists. In such a scenario, Israel would lose its strategic advantage in the region.\nIt would lose its lead as a country of entrepreneurship and excellence, as foreign investment\nwould decline and talented young Israelis would build their future abroad. No responsible Israeli\nleader will allow such a nightmare to become a reality. The hateful declarations of Iran's leaders,\ncommitted to wiping the Jewish state off the map, do not assuage Israelis' fears.\n2. Economic sanctions cannot convince the regime in Teheran to abandon its nuclear project.\nHowever, sanctions can bring about the collapse of the regime if they are vigorously\nimplemented and enforced.\n3. An American military strike against Iran's nuclear facilities would be more effective\nthan an Israeli one. But disparaging Israel's capabilities and its military ingenuity, undermining\nits deterrence effect, is a grave mistake.\n4. Israel's operational window is closing. If Israel has to cope alone with the Iranian threat, its\nwindow of operational opportunity is narrower than the American one. It has to act sooner.\n5. An Israeli military strike in the next two months, contravening repeated demands by the\nU.S. President to postpone it, would be counterproductive. The damage of defying the\nPresident would be greater than the damage sustained by allowing the Iranian regime an\nadditional few months of advancing toward acquiring the bomb. Such a strike may broaden the\ngap between the U.S. and Israel and weaken the alliance, which all previous Israeli Prime-\nMinisters have safeguarded as a strategic asset of Israel.\n6. The United States has failed to prevent countries like Pakistan or North Korea from\nobtaining nuclear weapons. This record feeds Israeli skepticism about a U.S. success in the\ncase of Iran. This skepticism prevails despite the clear rhetoric and unquestionable commitments\nof the President and the Secretaries of State and Defense to prevent a nuclear Iran.\n7. The fact that the Israeli Prime Minister and the Republican presidential candidate share\nthe same political benefactor feeds suspicions in the Obama administration about Netanyahu's\nmotives for attacking Iran a few weeks before the U.S. presidential elections.\n8. The regional perspective cannot continue ignoring the unresolved Israeli-Palestinian\nconflict. This issue can no longer be swept under the rug. Maintaining the status quo is politically\ncomfortable in the short-run, but it will be combustible and devastating in the long run.\nAchieving the two-state solution will preserve Israel as a Jewish, democratic state. It will end\nIsrael's regional isolation. It will rebuild America's standing and influence in the Arab and\nMuslim world. Furthermore, these last two outcomes will strengthen America's and Israel's\nhands in thwarting Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions.\nThese eight basic facts combine to produce a complex reality. When fully understood, they can\npave the way to restoring U.S.-Israeli harmony. There is no symmetry between the United States, the super-power, and its tiny ally, Israel. But the \"package\" required from each side in order to\nmend fences has to include the following mutual commitments:\n1. Israel will not attack Iran in 2012.\n2. The United States will hold a joint intelligence estimate session with Israel in the early spring\nof 2013. If the conclusion of this joint estimate is that there is no substantial slow-down of the\nIranian nuclear project, the U.S. will take military action to destroy this project.\n3. The United States will oppose any attempt to intervene in Israel's strategic capacities and will\nprevent any monitoring of Israel's own strategic installations. At the same time, the United States\nwill uncompromisingly support Israel's right to preserve and develop its indigenous military\ncapacities.\n4. Israel will accept an American invitation to attend a peace conference that will be convened\nin the U.S. no later than mid-2013. This gathering will address the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, aiming to resolve it once and for all with an agreed-upon timetable for implementation.\nThese four commitments would serve the interests of both the United States and Israel. They\nwould enable the U.S. to resume its leadership role of peacemaking in the Middle East. And they\nwould provide a basis for binding the U.S. and Israel together as they face these challenging\ntimes."}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032162.txt_16179
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032162.txt
Re: begining edits
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nil Priell Barak"], "timestamp": "10/30/2014 2:50:38 AM", "subject": "Re: begining edits", "body": "David Ben Gurion was asked why he, after 2000 years, in contrast to the many great leaders in the past was uniquely able to re -established the State of Israel. BG responded that he thought that it must have been true that in ancient times people had been born with a sixth sense. The one enabling individuals to have the ability to recognize and the seize opportunities. Though few of those individuals remain I think I am one of the fortunate few. He didn't mentioned the horrors or the sacrifice of the 48' war. I believe Menachem Begin had it,as several years after the bitter 73' war he was able to make a daring peace with Egypt. Als lzhak Rabin,who now 20yrs ago, signed the Peace treaty with Jordan though in amidst a wave of terror. He faced huge internal rejection but it began the first baby steps towards a settlement with the Palestinians. As we all know he was assassinated by a Jewish terrorist. These leaders all faced many risks, yet were able to see and seize an opportunity. Statesmanship and leadership..\n\nDuring the last three years we have been living through a geo political earthquake. The world order, which existed since the demise of the Ottoman Empire, is collapsing.The Arab Spring appears to have turned into an Islamist Winter. Borders are erased. Old tribal and sectarian disputes have awakened. In perfect storm like fashion Israel now finds itself surrounded by clashes of civilizations, in addition to the Islam confrontation between fanatic terror and moderna, Suna and Shia, the legacy threats: Iran, Assad in Syria, Hezbullah in Lebanon,Hamas in Gaza are all still active and worrying.\n\nwe have to be alert and ready to strongly respond to any threat to our security..\n\nBut I believe new opportunities are there for the taking. This opportunity,which might not occur again for generations ,is the potential to reshape our relationships with the Arab Moderates based on our common concerns. Extremism, Terror and Iran. This could open the gate to a more peaceful Middle East based on cooperation and synergies rather than blood and revenge. However thers is, in my opnion n o way to achieve but to move forward with the Palestinians\n\nA precondition to seize such an opportunity is a mighty, sober, self confident Israel, in strong alliance with the US. An Israel which can deter or defeat any combination of regional powers, yet, an Israel who is ready to contemplate and consider a modified Saudi or Arab League Plan as a basis for negotiations.\n\nThe unique relationship we have developed with the US over the last 45yrs based on common values ,mutual respect and shared interests is a cornerstone of our strength, world posture and our future. It is also a crucial building block of any regional peace and cooperation strategy.Allowing IL/US relations to remain damaged, I believe is a grave mistake with potentially far reaching consequences.\n\nAs the Minister of Defense of Israel I've met more than once with President Obama , as well as with President Bush before him„ reiterating with both that the though the US is clearly our best friend and ally, Israel is a Sovereign state and when our security and the future of Israel and the Jewish people are at stake we might need to take tough decisions on our own. We cannot and will not, I added, delegate the responsibility for such decisions to even our best friends ,. We respect the fact that we might have different views. American Presidents have always understood that . We also must have the same respect when the US decides it is its interest to take decisions we might not fully agree with.\n\nthis relation is of course not fully symmetric. It is the US which will provides Israel with the new F-35s and ensures the Qualitative Edge of the IDF vis a vis any combination of neighbors. It is the US who significantly financed the Iron Dome, Arrow and David's Sling missile defense systems. It is the US that has commited to defend Israel in the event of a missile attack from Iran.\n\nWe should never forget it.\n\nThe recent spurt of verbal exchanges is a worrying signal that something has gone wrong. It needs corrrection.. Netanyahu is not a coward. I've seen him as a young special forces officer ,under my command, facing fire directly and taking risks to his life. A very courageous soldier. That will never change. cheap words serve little purpose .The same applies to President Obama and Secretary Kerry. they are not enemies of Israel. they are Good Friends. Kerry has exhibited decades long support for Israel. Since he became Secretary of State he has invested his time energy and prestige trying to help Israel and the Palestinians to bridge disputes and reach a breakthrough. it was a noble effort which should justify thanks rather than accustations. We are of course concerned by the lack of outcome of the P5+1 negotiations with Iran and we think that the chemical weapons removal from Syria could have been handled differently But President Obama strengthens the legacy of Presidential support for Israel.. Israel has a vital interest in resuming the healthy trust, and mutual respect that existed until recently.\n\n. I believe that the most profound internal debate inside Israel today is in regard to the relationship between Israel's security needs and the viability of the \"two states solution\". We all agree that we are living in a tough, merciless and highly unpredictable neighborhood..So it is clear that our security needs are of the highest priority and we should build certain \"safety margins\" into any future security planning.But the Israeli Right is going too far by arguing that the security needs of Israel renders any viable,demilitarized independent, Palestinian State - impossible.\n\nIn other words, the \" lesson\" of recent years according to our Right is that Israel's Security and the \"two states solution\" are incompatible. I believe this is a fallacious conclusion, driven by narrow political interests.\n\nI've served a lifetime career, fighting and defending my country's security. Most of the time in uniform. Based on this experience ,I confidently conclude,and it is a professional rather than political answer, that if and when a Palestinian demilitarized independent State will be established side by side with Israel behind borders which will consist of a solid Jewish majority for generations to come and will include the major \"Settlement Blocks\" accompanied by mutually agreed swaps and an Israeli long term military presence along the River Jordan - the IDF and the SecurityServices will be capable of defending Israel. Moreover, I'm confident that if we will bring together all former Israeli Chiefs of Staff, all former Commanders of the Central Command( responsible for Judea and Samaria) and all former Heads of Intelligence ,SecServices and Mossad, an extremely vast majority of them will agree with me on this issue. True,it might take time, frustrations and setbacks. It might have to go through prolonged periods of interim arrangements. but the IDF is much superior to any conceivable rival and will be able to defend Israel under all those circumstances.\n\nthe Right argument is convoluted, the opposite is true. The real big threat to the Zionist Project is not the \"two state solution\" but rather the \"one state solution\" which will lead inevitably to either a non Jewish or a non democratic, potentially ever bleeding State. Still,this is the vision the Israeli extreme Right shares unknowingly with the Hamas (and with all due differences with the lunatic, Post Zionist fringes of the Israeli Left).\n\nIn order to seize the opportunity for regional peace and cooperation arrangements and in order to block the deterioration towards \"one state solution\" action, tenacity and decisiveness will be essential. politics of survival, anxiety and pessimism will not do.\n\nwe are facing a moment of truth. a time for daring decisions.The essence of Zionism, its raison d'être had always been to take our fate in our hands. make decisions and follow them with actions, rather than being dragged by events and decisions of others and paying the price for it.\n\nour legendary Foreign Minister Abba Eban famously said that the Palestinians had never missed an opportunity to miss an opportunity. Lets not fall into the same trap."}, {"sender": "Nil Priell Barak", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:12 PM", "subject": "Re: begining edits", "body": "herewith the Op Ed. Please let me know your opinion and your remarks.\n\nthanks,\n\nEB"}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032604.txt_16180
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032604.txt
Re: science in Trump time
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 4:46 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "Startup idea - marketplace where a scientist can find a donor. I realize what we've started. We've started a new PR campaign to engage donors to support science during Trump's time. It can be massive. And you can be a face of if it doesn't sound scary for you G But what I really like it's actually important and we are the first one who started thinking about it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 3:50 AM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "yes a kickstarter with no return, you form a 501 c 3 charity, that can accept donations. and give them out to scientists. . it s avery clever idea. good work!"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 11:39:24 PM", "subject": "Re: science in Trump time", "body": "I'll think how to execute on it. I'm very focused on my fund but I want it to exist, will find a way"}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030663.txt_16184
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030663.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 10:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "brett ratner now. oy"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, November 1, 2017 2:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number ?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Charlie rose is next"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 5:05 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Just landed in san fran...at the airport...let's talk when | get settled..."}]
4
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023971.txt_16185
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023971.txt
ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More
[{"sender": "ASMALLWORLD [ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net]", "recipients": ["jeeproject@yahoo.com"], "timestamp": "7/27/2011 2:09:40 PM", "subject": "ASW Travel Deals: London, NYC, Miami, Maui, Racing in Baja, Hiking Moab and More", "body": "If you are unable to see this message, click here to view. To ensure delivery to your inbox, add ASMALLWORLD@travel.asmallworld.net to your address book.\n\nEo\n\nActive Escapes, Quiet Getaways and More\nWednesday, July 27, 2011"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031569.txt_16192
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031569.txt
That was fun , see you in 3 weeks
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Thiel"], "timestamp": "5/19/2014 10:37:05 AM", "subject": "That was fun , see you in 3 weeks", "body": "FP Briefing non- classified\n19 May, 2014\n\nThe National Interest\n\nWhich Road Will Egypt Take?\nKathryn Alexeeff\n\nNow Lebanon\n\nWhat Saudi-Iran talks could mean for Lebanon and the\nregion\nAlex Rowell\n\nThe Economist\nIndia's next prime minister: The Modi era begins\nThe Christian Science Monitor\n\nAn India ready to dream big\nEditorial\n\nHiirriyet\n\nWill it be Cyprus’ year?\nYusuf Kanli\n\nThe National Interest\n\nStars Are Aligned for a Solution in Cyprus\nOzdil Nami\n\nThe diplomat\n\nChina’s Instructive Syria Policy\nAdrien Morin"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032060.txt_16195
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032060.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "10/11/2016 3:50:20 AM", "subject": null, "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/high-profile-casey-anthony-attorney-now-representing-jane-doe-in-trump-rape-lawsuit/"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033268.txt_16201
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033268.txt
Friday POTUS
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "1/9/2018 1:04:53 AM", "subject": "Friday POTUS", "body": "Boston / Bedford are not gateway airports to PBI. \nOnly airports that are gateway into Palm Beach are: \nWhite Plains \nTeterboro \nOrlando \nDulles \nOrlando \nFortlauderdale \nMost operators are using Boca for arrivals when Trump is in town. Parking reservation at Boca are required \nsince the ramp fill up. Other options is Fort Lauderdale when Boca is full. \nPOTUS arrival — Friday, January 12th, time TBD (likely PM) \nPOTUS departure — Monday, January 15th, time TBD (likely PM) \nShould I request parking at Boca? \nThx \nLarry"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029088.txt_16208
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029088.txt
Re: Fwd:
[{"sender": "ji@media.mitedu", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/3/2017 3:16:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Can't seem to open the attachment..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ji@media.mitedu"], "timestamp": "Feb 2, 2017, at 20:24", "subject": "Fwd:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 6:45 PM", "subject": "Re: Fwd:", "body": "Dear Jeffrey\nTwo questions.\n1—do you believe the stock market will continue to climb given what we have now seen of Trump-land?\n[Strictly confidential]\n2—what do you think of the attached (N=1)? You do not drink or smoke, probably do not inject etc. you swim\nor exercise every day, so your heartbeat is expected to be low and less variable than average. Is your ability to\npredict heart rate accurately—without holding your neck or wrist—positively related to your ability to succeed\nin the financial world—as the attached strongly suggests. Just give me and N=1.\nRemember you asked me, what does self-knowledge have to do with anything—and here is a most intriguing\nexample.\nI will send you a joke shortly\nAll best\nbob"}]
3
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023030.txt_16214
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023030.txt
FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
[{"sender": "GMAX <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:28 PM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are ae\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was\n\nnaked on massage table. Ms Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein\n\nand directed I to copy her.\nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint.\n\n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant iii\nand Mr Epstein.\n\n3. Ms Maxwell kept sex toys and costumes in the Palm Beach mansion and dressed [ prior to sex\nsessions with Mr Epstein. S Maxwell herself wore black vinyl during sex sessions with Mr Epstein.\n\n4. | was paid between US $200 and $ 5000 US sex, depending on whether it involved travel and other\nmen.\n\nia was required to have sex with friends of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, including Glenn Dubin, Les\nWexner, Ehud Barak, former Senator George Mitchell and Stephen Kosslyn."}]
3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032555.txt_16216
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032555.txt
Re: Kuhn
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 1:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Disappointed to miss in NY - I’m here until August ~11 if your schedule changes.\n\nTiming for Breakthrough series? Appreciate for planning purposes.\n\nLatest China -\n\nQ&A on US-China, China risks - http://www.atimes.com/article/us-china-talks-no-trade-war-xi-trump-\nbromance-cools/\n\nBeijing Meeting - http://www.scio.gov.cn/32618/Document/1558546/1558546.htm"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Jul 22, 2017, at 1:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "we can skype or phone , ready when you are re breakthrough"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/22/2017 7:29:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn", "body": "Great. When’s good - Skype/FaceTime/phone? Time Zone?"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029063.txt_16219
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029063.txt
Re: interesting
[{"sender": "Alain Forget", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/18/2016 11:30:28 AM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "i do not believe in a global tea party. but it is most interesting to see how those ideas will materialize and to witch exdend Ill be most interested to hear your point of wiew"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 18, 2016, at 12:14 PM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "your view?"}, {"sender": "Alain Forget", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 7:12 AM", "subject": "Re: interesting", "body": "Donald Trump's newly named chief strategist and senior counselor, Steve Bannon, laid out his global nationalist vision in unusually in-depth remarks delivered by Skype to a conference held inside the Vatican in the summer of 2014."}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033283.txt_16220
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033283.txt
Connolly digging into Trump and you...
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2016 9:05:31 PM", "subject": "Connolly digging into Trump and you...", "body": ""}]
1
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021508.txt_16227
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021508.txt
Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/05/2008
[{"sender": "Miami", "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 03/05/2008", "body": "are charged for these records (as the FBI is a tax exempt entity). The DEDOC indicated that a \"Priority 7\" day certification request would take approximately two weeks to process. In addition, the DEDOC gave a quote for the various records and a total amount for the corporate records to be requested outlined as follows:\n\nTotal: $\n\nThird Party Draft is requested to issue AFI an advance check in the amount of\n\nmade payable to \"Delaware Secretary of State\" in order to obtain certified copies\n\nAFI will provide an invoice for these records once obtained from the Delaware Secretary of State. It should be noted that the receipt of the invoice will take 14 to 20 days.\n\nFor information of Third Party Draft in order to create a vendor account for the DEDOC:\n\nDelaware Secretary of State\nDivision of Corporations\nJohn G. Townsend Building\n401 Federal Street\n\nSuite 4\n\nDover, DE 19901\n\ntel: (302) 739-3073"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030844.txt_16231
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030844.txt
The J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating
[{"sender": "US GIO [us.gio@jpmorgan.com]", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients:"], "timestamp": "3/29/2013 8:48:11 PM", "subject": "The J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating", "body": "J.P Morgan\n\nGlobal Asset Allocation\n\nThe J.P. Morgan View: Local forces are dominating\n\nJC\n\nMorgan View Video\n\ne Asset allocation — Local risks and opportunities trump global forces in driving investment opportunities. Cross-market\ncorrelations to remain much lower than in recent years.\n\ne Economics — US activity data are coming in better than hoped, but we need another 1-2 months to see how consumers are\nresponding to higher taxes.\n\ne Fixed Income — Search for carry to trump Euro area jitters over time.\ne Equities — Japan remains our main country overweight.\n\ne Credit — We OW covered bonds in the Euro periphery over senior bank bonds and subordinated vs senior bank bonds in the\ncore.\n\ne Currencies — Cyprus to have minimal further impact on EUR, but a ECB rate cut would push it a few cents lower versus the\ndollar.\n\ne Commodities — Stay long Brent and short gasoline.\n\ne US stocks continue to gain, with the benchmark S&P500 breaching its all time high level today in a gentle fashion. Bonds\nare generally up this week on dovish comments from both the Fed and the BoJ. Commodities have gained also, but credit remains\nthe troubled asset class with spreads wider in most markets, especially in EM external debt.\n\ne Our overall investment theme remains that there is no overarching global investment theme anymore this year but instead\na number of unrelated local forces that have largely local impact. The generalized asset reflation we saw last year, with risk\npremia coming down consistently across the globe and asset classes, was due to a gradual fading of tail risks that has since been\nlargely completed. “Risk-on, risk- off is so last year”.\n\ne In addition, we are secing no momentum either way in global growth, price or earnings expectations that could put us into\na bullish or bearish growth story. Our 2.4% projection for 2013 world economic growth is unchanged since November. YTD\nactivity data for the world are tracking our 2.6% forecast for Q1, comfortably up from the dismal 1.6% in Q4 of last year. Amidst\noffsetting up- and downside surprises in the US and Japan versus Europe, there has been no reason yet to raise the growth profile\nfor the year as a whole. We hope, but need evidence first.\n\ne Without a global growth or fading-of-tail-risks force, we are left with a set of local issues and opportunities that are having a\nlocal impact, at the regional, asset class and company level, that should leave the rest of the world largely unmoved. In this\nenvironment, correlations across regions and risk markets should remain significantly lower than in past years. Various\nmarkets may seem to behave “inconsistently” with others, but we caution against expecting simple mean reversion, given our\nview of the reduced impact of global factors. Active investors should pay more attention to local fundamentals while long-term\ninvestors can expect to achieve greater gains from cross-market and international diversification.\n\ne Local issues must be monitored and understood, though, to decide how to allocate capital and risk. Just to review a few, Japanese\npolicy makers continue to present a concerted plan to reflate their economy through monetary, fiscal and structural measures. The"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031596.txt_16238
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031596.txt
Re: Trump
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:51:09 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "read the uzz feed re my airplane logs and hawain tropic contest. / have them ask my houseman about\ndonad almost walking through the door leaving his nose print on the glass as young women were swimming in\nthe pool and he was so focused he walked straight into the door"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon DR", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it --\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die."}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033139.txt_16247
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033139.txt
null
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "12/20/2018 12:09:41 PM", "subject": null, "body": "you might want to tell your dem friends that treating trump like a mafia don , ignores the fact that he has great\ndangerous power.. tightening the noose too slowly , risks a very bad situation.. gambino was never the\ncommander in chief. there was little gambino could do as the walls closed in. not so with this maniac"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030688.txt_16248
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030688.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 1:42:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}]
2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026119.txt_16250
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026119.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "getting hotter"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wow | wonder what Jarred did u know DJT knew!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you on cell?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes but bad time call me at 8 or early tomorrow"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 6:03 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ping me when awake"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Call me now if u can"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Sunday, May 28, 2017 8:13 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}]
7
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017827.txt_16252
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017827.txt
Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "Timothy Jones", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Monday, April 22, 2019 4:16 PM", "subject": "Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Peggy,\n\nMy good friend Eleanore reached out to you on my behalf and I appreciate you wanting to hear more about this project.\n\nI am a TV journalist who covered the Epstein story for several years and wrote a best selling book about him with James Patterson in 2016.\n\nJim Patterson and I are now consulting on a four hour Netflix documentary series tentatively set to air towards the end of the year.\n\nThe showrunner, Lisa Bryant, is working with director Joe Berlinger whose work I am sure you are familiar with, to produce a fair and balanced, in-depth recounting of the Epstein saga that, as you know, has every possible dramatic angle and is a story like no other.\n\nWe thought of you because of your remarkable reputation in the public relations and show business world and the fact that you were an acquaintance of Jeffrey Epstein.\n\nThe tawdry side of the story has been told...We hope you can give us some insight and context into who he was before his life fell apart.\n\nI am sure that Lisa Bryant,Joe Berlinger and Jim Patterson would all make themselves available to get on a call with you this week.\n\nJim is in Florida,and Joe is traveling overseas for his Ted Bundy film.\n\nLisa is in New York and would be happy to meet you in person as would I.\n\nThanks for giving this your consideration.\n\nBest,\nTim Malloy"}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal <peggysiegal@example.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 4:08 AM", "subject": "Fw: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Jeffrey....how much do you know about this?\nWhen can I call you tomorrow? I know nothing but have friends at Netflix.\nEleanora Kennedy called me today....out of the blue...and told me the film makers wanted to talk to me. I know director Joe Berlinger, not well, but may have done a screening on one of his films. Would have to check.\nI am around all day tomorrow.\nxoxo Peggy"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 3:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:34 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Patterson , the Perversion of Justice Team, and the guy making the 'Ted Bundy' film --- sounds like a potential hagiography"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 5:53 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "berlinger is a bit of a hack. when you get a moment give me a call"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "and Patterson's not!!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "4/23/2019 9:55:44 AM", "subject": "Re: Netflix/Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "patterson book on my a flop and his work with clinton worse. hes old. but has a name. there is also john conally. hes on it as well"}]
7
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026422.txt_16254
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026422.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Nov 6, 2016, at 6:30 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "birthday/?"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:15 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Yes! You beat my family. (How'd you know?)\nI celebrated in Beijing by (i) developing the Sleep/Dream proposal we discussed, (ii) lunch with an MNC CEO, and (iii) playing two hours of intense table tennis with a top coach."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 6, 2016, at 8:23 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "you mentioned it at my house. unfortunately , I cant avoid remembering numbers"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 1:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "You've got a jumbo-sized right superior parietal lobe.\nhttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/our-brains-have-a-map-for-numbers/"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 6, 2016, at 8:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "for me it is tied to music. beethovens fifth, is 555-3 . though unbeknownst to most people the first note ( you can verify, bu looking at the score ) , is a rest note ( silent ) so 0-555-3"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 2:00 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Didn't know. Meaning of the rest note?\nMahler's 5th opens with the same rhythmic motif (but 4th note is the same as the first three, not lower as in Beethoven's) - Mahler's 5th is my favorite symphony."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 6, 2016, at 9:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "its not ba ba ba- bah. its regular (ba ) ba ba ba - bah. regular four eighth notes , but the first is not sounded . changes the whole dynamic and wildly misunderstood"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 8:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I almost get it...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 27, 2016, at 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "are you having fun?"}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Fun (transient) with Trump-China: \n\"What China Thinks of President-Elect Trump\" broadcast on CCTV News, discussion with former Chinese ambassador to U.S. and head of Chinese Association of American studies - streamed - \nhttp://english.cnty.cn/2016/11/13NIDEytqdltlf30eFnd6vTIxy161113.shtml \nInterview - http://www.atimes.com/article/china-wants-build-relations-dealmaker-trump/ \nMore fun (enduring) with Closer To Truth; working new episodes from FQXi conference (e.g., \"Physics of the Observer\", \"Physics of Consciousness\", \"Quantum Cosmology of the Beginning?\", Philosophy of Cosmology); progressing on \"Sleep & Dreams\". \nIn LA for 2 weeks, then back to China; NY in January. You there then? \nLove to get your sense of Trump's administration, policies. \nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 4:35:10 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "there are no policies yet"}]
11
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026344.txt_16258
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026344.txt
Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "9/20/2014 1:43:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Wow"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Saturday, September 20, 2014", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General", "body": "http://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General"}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033297.txt_16259
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033297.txt
Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia!!
[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayem", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/2/2016 9:25:10 PM", "subject": "Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia!!", "body": "Donald Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia\nClinton attacks Trump's foreign policy as 'dangerously incoherent' 1 / 27U.S. Democratic presidential candidate\nHillary Clinton lambasted Donald Trump's foreign policy platform as \"dangerously incoherent\" in a speech on\nThursday that cast her Republican rival as both a dangerous and laughable figure.\nA former U.S. secretary of state, Clinton attacked Trump for his policies and his character, suggesting Trump\nmight start a nuclear war if elected to the White House simply because \"someone got under his very thin skin.\"\n\"Donald Trump's ideas are not just different, they are dangerously incoherent,\" she said to a room of supporters\nin San Diego, California. \"They're not even really ideas, just a series of bizarre rants, personal feuds and\noutright lies.\"\n____0 Mike Blake U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton delivers a speech on national\nsecurity in San Diego, California, United States June 2, 2016.\nClinton, the front-runner in the race to become the Democratic presidential nominee, delivered her speech as\nshe seeks to shift her attention to the Nov. 8 election against likely rival Trump and away from Bernie Sanders,\na U.S. senator from Vermont, who is continuing his longshot bid for the nomination.\nTrump, the Republicans' presumptive nominee, has said he would sit down with North Korean leader Kim Jong\nUn to try to stop Pyongyang's nuclear program and has criticized the decades-old NATO alliance with mainly\nEuropean nations as obsolete and too costly for the United States.\nClinton derided these and other positions, promising she would do a better job keeping the United States safe\nand standing in front of a backdrop of 19 large U.S. flags, an unusual abundance even by the standards of\npresidential campaign events.\nTrump, a billionaire businessman who has never held elected office or worked in government before, says he\nhas experience dealing with foreign governments through setting up hotels, resorts, golf courses and beauty\npageants in foreign countries. Clinton, who is also a former U.S. senator and former first lady, mocked this.\n\"He says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia,\" she said to loud\nlaughter.\nTrump has talked tough on foreign policy. He has said he would bring back waterboarding and other brutal\ninterrogation techniques for terrorism suspects that are widely regarded as torture and were discontinued by\nDemocratic President Barack Obama.\nHe has also vowed to renegotiate trade deals, called for a temporary ban on Muslims entering the country, and\nsaid he would ask members of the 28-nation NATO alliance to \"pay up\" or \"get out.\"\nTrump has criticized Clinton for her handling of foreign policy during her 2009-2013 stint as foreign secretary,\nincluding the Sept. 11, 2012, attack by Islamist militants on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya, that\nkilled the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.\nHe cites Clinton's support for the Iraq war - launched by former Republican President George W. Bush - as\nanother example of her shortcomings.\nAt a rally Wednesday night in Sacramento, California, Trump said he had seen a copy of Clinton's speech and\n\"it was such lies about my foreign policy.\""}]
1
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023024.txt_16265
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023024.txt
Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": ["Sirs", "Ce: Nick Pykc Si Li: Hartley"], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial\nand the witness list which names pnd other young women who allege they were underage\n\nvictims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their\nclaims.\n\nui further has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and\ninstructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of\nentertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact\ninformation is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is 1pm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher"}, {"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 18, 2013, at 6:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Fred Haddad", "recipients": ["Tonja Haddad Coleman"], "timestamp": "10/19/2013 12:10:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}]
3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032541.txt_16266
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032541.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/9/2017 3:39:07 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Appreciate consideration. I’m next in NY June 7 (for about a week); love to brainstorm.... I too would really\nlike to do something (important) together.\n\nJust arrived in Beijing for the “The Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation” (commentating), the\n\nsecond most important event of 2017 in China (after the upcoming Party Congress), but Western media not\npaying much attention, what with All-Things-Trump."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017, at 7:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "hope things are well. . when are you back. . I would love to do something with you , but sleep is not going to\nbe it.. Ihave read quite alot and frankly , the subject is fascinating but i see no real insights. just more\nquestions and mostly the same ones that have been asked for years. . yes, its role in many processes are now\nbecoming apparent. but I see no theories that can hold their own( yet )."}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021403.txt_16271
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021403.txt
Fwd: Fw:
[{"sender": "\"Wolfe, Alexandra\"", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz,\n\nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on the phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he could tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the information I already have by you or him.\n\nThank you,\nAlexandra\n\n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? Could he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference?\n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the same clients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion?\n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising?\n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago?\n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell?\n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction?\n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why?\n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive?\n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw:", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe,\n\nI understand you have some questions about my client, Jeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage surrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some instances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you send me any facutal questions so that I can provide you with accurate responses.\n\nI am also available to speak with you. My number is\n\nThank you,\nJay"}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Darren"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 11:11 AM", "subject": "Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Mike Sitrick"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 1:10:38 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw:", "body": ""}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031610.txt_16273
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031610.txt
Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "4/28/2016 4:28:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeff Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": "April 28, 2016 at 12:14:37 PM EDT", "subject": "RE: Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Sorry, the suit is attached to this email."}, {"sender": "Ingram, David (Reuters News)", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Thursday, April 28, 2016 12:14 PM", "subject": "Reuters / lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Marty, \nThe attached lawsuit was filed this week in federal court in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and another \nman, Donald Trump, raped her in 1994. We're planning to publish a story on the suit this afternoon, and we \nwant to make sure it is fair. Is Mr. Epstein available to speak? Or do you want to offer a comment on this \nbehalf?\n\nThank you in advance.\nDavid Ingram\nCorrespondent\nReuters News\nThomson Reuters"}]
4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030878.txt_16287
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030878.txt
Steve Bannon was supposed to be in Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 11/9'
[{"sender": "Richard Kahr", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/15/2018 1:09:39 AM", "subject": "Steve Bannon was supposed to be in Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 11/9'", "body": "https://pagesix.com/2018/09/14/steve-bannon-was-supposed-to-appear-in-michael-moores-fahrenheit-1 1-9/?_ga=2.179263469.891655311.1536972901-2116259238.1278814960\n\nSteve Bannon almost appeared in Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 11/9'\n\nSteve Bannon was invited to be in Michael Moore’s latest documentary, “Fahrenheit 11/9,” and while the former White House strategist declined to go on camera, he did meet with Moore for two hours, the filmmaker revealed after the film’s NYC premiere.\n\nAfter a Lincoln Center screening, Moore, at a Tavern on the Green party, revealed Bannon was almost in the film. “We wanted Steve Bannon to answer that first question in the film: ‘How the f—k did this happen?’ ” the liberal gadfly told guests.\n\n“It took a long time. We finally got him to come over, no cameras ... He said he wanted to talk to me first. And we talked to him for two hours.”\n\nUltimately, Bannon decided not to go on camera, but the conversation had a seismic impact on the finished film anyway.\n\n“He said something very profound to us, and it changed us and it changed the course of the film,” Moore said of Bannon. “I asked him, ‘How did you pull this [Trump’s election] off?’ And he said, ‘It’s a very easy answer. Our side, we go for the head wound. Your side, you have pillow fights.’ ”\n\nMoore continued, “That so {-ked us up to hear him say that ... watching him smirk as he said it. As soon as he left, we decided to watch the film ... and put the pillow fight filter.”\n\nOne example Moore gave of a change to his film post-Bannon was a line about news networks being run by men, from “most” to “all.”\n\n“It’s amazing how we talk as liberals. We always want to be nice and maybe be fair,” Moore explained.\n\nThe film also jabs at the media, highlighting major newsmen who have turned out to be predators, including Matt Lauer and Charlie Rose."}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033111.txt_16291
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033111.txt
Re: Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels | Bossip
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 4:27:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels | Bossip", "body": "did you get your money?"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Donald Trump only lasted 2 minutes during sex says Stormy Daniels | Bossip", "body": "In Europe saw this it will drive him crazy!!\nhttps://bossip.com/1664506/premature-potus-stormy-daniels-says-donald-trump-only-lasted-2-minutes-inside-her-pornographic-pleasure-pocket-43081/"}]
2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029960.txt_16296
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029960.txt
RE: Hello
[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/18/2016 4:41:19 PM", "subject": "RE: Hello", "body": "That sucks..."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Gwendolyn Beck"], "timestamp": "5/18/2016 10:46 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "impossisble to get rid of"}, {"sender": "Ivy", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:42 AM", "subject": "RE: Hello", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nHope all is well with you. Enjoying this political climate @)? I moved from the Trump campaign to Kasich\nas there was a fabulous opportunity to be on his Advisory Committee for Elder Issues. Now, I’m going to try\nto get on with Trump as an advisor. He’s going to have big problems with Trump University and the charge of\nSenior Financial Abuse in CA and FL.\n\nAlso, starting a new company helping Seniors age successfully, especially individuals with dementia - the\nearlier we catch it the better. I’ve been working with a memory center and individuals in DC and it’s\nremarkable the results I’ve been able to achieve over the last year. Of course, only want to work with\npeople/families/guardians that are SERIOUS about getting the best care. I stress ‘serious’ because I don’t want\nto get into a situation like as last summer.\n\nHow is Fred? It’s just sad sad sad that instead of letting me help him, Joe had me fixing his watch and finding\na school for his son... I think of where Fred could be today, and instead he’s probably locked up in his\napartment with no help that has dementia training — he probably thinks he’s crazy by now. Know you like Joe,\nbut it was sad sad sad that he didn’t let me do my job. Was it an intentional con? Very few things he said were\nthe truth (but, hey, people liked Bernie Madoff too)....\n\nAnyway — the past. I’m charging in the range of $1000 — 1500 per day plus expenses and it’s all highly\nconfidential. A customized ‘mind-body’ enhancement to achieve the most out of one’s life! And, training for\nthe family to help transition to the ‘new reality’ with their loved one with later stage dementia.\n\nI’m in NYC Friday for the annual meeting of the Circumnavigator’s Club, and will stay over the\nweekend. Love to see you if you’re in town! Would also like to have lunch with Fred - enjoyed his company -\n\nbut Joe probably won’t let that happen (3).\n\nLove you! And wishing you Love and Happiness, Gwendolyn"}]
3
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023018.txt_16314
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023018.txt
Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "Tonja Haddad Coleman", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "haddadfm@aol.com"], "timestamp": "10/18/2013 10:38:16 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esq.\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Sharon Churcher", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "October 18, 2013 at 6:32:28 PM EDT", "subject": "Request for comment from The Mail on Sunday with noon ET Saturday deadline re Mr Bradley Edwards vs Mr Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Sirs:\nWe are preparing an article about the calendaring today of Mr Edwards' claim against Mr Epstein for jury trial\nand the witness list which names i and other young women who allege they were underage\n\nvictims of Mr Epstein.\n\nMr Edwards claims that Mr Epstein maliciously attempted to intimidate him and his clients into retracting their\nclaims.\n\nfurther has stated to us that she intends to testify that she was flown to London by Mr Epstein and\ninstructed to have sex at age 17 with Prince Andrew. She alleges that she was paid $15k for this encounter.\n\nShe claims that on another occasion, Mr Epstein flew two young women to a dinner for the purpose of\nentertaining President Clinton. She claims she herself was sex trafficked to several other men, whose contact\ninformation is contained in an address book of Mr Epstein's filed in court records.\n\nMay we have a comment please? Our deadline is lpm tomorrow (SATURDAY) ET.\n\nYours sincerely,\nSharon Churcher\n\nThe Mail on Sunday (New York office)\n\nPh:"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026378.txt_16321
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026378.txt
Re: Follow up
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "2/27/2016 7:38:48 PM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "- ask him for a financial proposal. Subject to \nMutually acceptable conditions"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, February 27, 2016", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Unsatisfactory"}, {"sender": "\"Immelt, Stephen J.\"", "recipients": ["\"Kathy Ruemmler\""], "timestamp": "February 27, 2016 at 10:30:17 AM MST", "subject": "RE: Follow up", "body": "Kathy \n\nWe will of course do this in whatever sequence makes sense for you. It goes without saying that any move \nwould need to make economic sense. My assumption has been that your comp would fall outside of our \"bell \ncurve\", but that is not an issue for us as long as the potential contribution also falls outside. You would not be \nthe only partner outside the curve, and I am comfortable with expanding that group for people who can \ngenuinely move the needle while embracing the culture that makes us who we are. \n\nOne benefit of having Michael in the mix is that he can provide a global perspective, and he would be \nimportant for explaining the case outside the US if we moved forward. \n\nJust let me know when and how you want to speak next. \n\nBest, \nSteve"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Immelt, Stephen J."], "timestamp": "Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:08 AM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Hi Steve, \n\nI am still intrigued and would like to meet Michael. I thinks it makes sense, though, for us to have a more \nspecific conversation about compensation before I meet with him. I don't want to put the cart before the horse, \nbut as I mentioned, this would be a big move for me, and it would have to make sense economically in addition \nto being the right move for other reasons we have discussed. \n\nI hope you are well. Cannot believe that Christie endorsed Trump! \n\nBest, \nKathy"}, {"sender": "Immelt, Stephen J.", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Feb 25, 2016, at 5:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Follow up", "body": "Kathy \n\nI don't want to pester you, but in the hope that you are still intrigued, I wanted to suggest that we try to set up \nan opportunity for you to meet Michael Davison, our global head of litigation. MIchael is an International \nArbitration specialist based in London and a key player. He is also a lot of fun, notwithstanding his Scottish \nupbringing. \n\nLet me know. \n\nBest, \nSteve"}]
5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031604.txt_16322
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031604.txt
Re: Trump
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy_________________________into on you and Trump. Because of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it\n-- Jeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 4:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl\nlauren petrella"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015, 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon <_______________________", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Dec 8, 2015", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Do you mind if I pass Petrella's contact on to a political reporter? I won't do it unless you say OK\nbecause after that I would have no say as to where story goes. Let me know -- its not a big deal for me\neither way. But at some point this stuff will come out -- as long he continues to top polls."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 10:59:55 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Pass on midelfart wealthiest girl in Norway"}]
6
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012632.txt_16323
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012632.txt
Conference Call with Bert Ocariz
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Conference Call with Bert Ocariz", "body": "some serious concern.\n1. Can we get a copy of the indictment (or can you tell me the nature of the crimes against the girls)?\nCertainly he should not get a copy of any indictment.\n\n2. When will it be possible to see the plea agreement so that we understand exactly what Epstein concedes to in the\ncivil case?\n\nI don't think he should get the plea agreement either.\n3. Is there any cap or other limitation on attorney's fees that the defendant will pay in the civil case?\nI can’t imagine he would be entitled to anything other than an hourly fee.\n\n4. What is the contemplated procedure for, and timing of, the payment of attorney's fees and costs?\n\nIn any event, I need to consider these issues carefully and I cannot agree to any of these issues before we speak. I\nwould suggest we plan on talking tomorrow at 12 pm if you are available."}, {"sender": "\"Villafana, Ann Marie C. (USAFLS)\"", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "09/27/2007 10:51 AM AST", "subject": "Conference Call with Bert Ocariz", "body": "Hi Jay — Bert's firm has raised a number of good questions about how they are going to get paid\nand setting up a procedure that avoids any conflict of interest with their clients. Are you around\ntoday to do a conference call? Let me know what times work for you because Bert wants to get\ntheir conflicts counsel on the call with us.\n\nThese are some of the questions he sent to me. I told Bert that as part of our agreement we (the\nfederal government) are not going to indict Mr. Epstein, but gave him an idea of the charges that\nwe had planned to bring as related to 18 USC 2255. With respect to question 2, do I have your\npermission to send Bert just that section of the plea agreement that applies to the damages claims\n(I would recommend sending paragraphs 7 through 10, or at least 7 and 8)? Can you talk with\nyour client about items 3 and 4? I envisioned Shook Hardy sending regular bills to you, with\nany privileged information redacted, and being paid like every other client pays the bills."}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030095.txt_16326
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030095.txt
Re: Trump Soho
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/17/2009 5:54:29 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump Soho", "body": "I spoke to henri and bob, henri tried hard to bullshit me, telling me he had talked to the studios and felt comfortable he could raise over 100 million in guaranteed distribution, I checked, and of course, it turned out to be smoke. I like bob, and would have hope your friend would have more respect for. him. I will look in to trump."}, {"sender": "<=11IM11.11>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump Soho", "body": "Just heard from an insider that they will probably go into foreclosure ...the deal is done and dead... .building is complete ready to open in Feb\nOnly 30%/ 35% sold...hardly any can actually close.\nNot sure if this is interesting..., can have you talk to the developer (Sapir)\nHope all is well...."}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019407.txt_16328
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019407.txt
Fw:
[{"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Michael S. Sitrick", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/8/2011 4:40:35 PM", "subject": "Fw: ", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "03/08/2011 10:39 AM CST", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Alexandra, \nI have not been able to respond to your questions because Mr. Epstein is traveling. \nBut if you plan to make any factual assertions about him in your article, I hope you will run the facts \nby me, as you said yesterday you would do. \nMr. Epstein has been the subject of many inaccurate and misleading articles, and I am sure Newsweek would \nnot want to make such a mistake or worse, libel him. \nBest, \nJay"}, {"sender": "Wolfe, Alexandra", "recipients": ["Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "03/07/2011 02:04 PM EST", "subject": "RE: ", "body": "Dear Mr. Lefkowitz, \nHere are the questions I'd like to ask Jeffrey Epstein. Would he be available to answer any of these on \nthe phone or by email? People have told me some of his thoughts on background but I wanted to see if he \ncould tell me or email me anything directly I could use on the record. Also I'd like to run the \ninformation I already have by you or him. \nThank you, \nAlexandra \n-What is he chiefly focusing on now? Is he spending more time on The Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation? \nCould he talk about his interest in science and the 2011 grants/conference? \n-How has his business been affected? Is there any new direction he's taking it? Does he still have the \nsame clients or new ones? Is it still at $15 billion? \n-Did he still work while in prison? How was that arranged? With whom was he working/advising? \n-Where is he spending his time now? How has his social life changed from three years ago? \n-Is he still close with Ghislaine Maxwell? \n-What were friends/colleagues/acquaintances reactions to his conviction? \n-What does he think about the sentence he got- was it too lenient or too harsh and why? \n-What is his side of the story and have people been supportive? \n-Is he continuing the charity initiatives he started with Bill Clinton, etc?"}, {"sender": "Jay Lefkowitz", "recipients": ["Wolfe, Alexandra"], "timestamp": "Mon 3/7/2011 12:18 PM", "subject": "Fw: ", "body": "Dear Ms. Wolfe, \nI understand you have some questions about my client, \nJeffrey Epstein. Given that much of the press coverage \nsurrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and in some \ninstances, defamatory, I would like to suggest that you \nsend me any factual questions so that I can provide you \nwith accurate responses. \nI am also available to speak with you. My number is \nThank you, \nJay"}]
4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029545.txt_16330
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029545.txt
Re: boosting strategy
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 7, 2014, at 6:56 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "About 4,880,000 results (0.33 seconds) different computer, not good\nSearch Results\n\n1. Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey Epstein\n\nWikipedia\n\nJeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier and science and education\nphilanthropist. He worked at Bear Stearns early in his ...\n\nLife - Financial career - Science funding - Solicitation of prostitution\n\n2. Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Myster\n\nnymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/\n\nNew York Magazine\n\nHe's pals with a passel of Nobel Prize—winning scientists, CEOs like Leslie Wexner of the Limited, socialite\nGhislaine Maxwell, even Donald Trump. But it wasn't ...\n\n3. Jeffrey Epstein: Sex Offender, Yes. Billionaire, No. - Forbes\n\ncs\nLA\n\nwww.forbes.com/.../jeffrey-epstein-sex-offender-yes-bil...\n\nForbes\n\nby Clare O'Connor - in 144 Google+ circles\n\nFeb 28, 2011 - Palm Beach pervert Jeffrey Epstein is all over the news today, thanks to a series of\nstories in the UK's Daily Mail linking the convicted pedophile ...\n\n4, Jeffrey Epstein Philanthropy: Overview\n\nwww .jeffreyepstein.org/\nJeffrey Epstein Philanthropy supports innovative research and programs in science, medicine, education and\ninternational affairs."}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Christina Galbraith", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "2/8/2014 1:32:58 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Understand the two negatives are still present. We are still on track per our last call of 60 days from 1/10 if we\ncan get the placement out next week Christina is preparing for us and results continue to respond as they have\nbeen.\n\nIt takes 30 days for Google to respond in most cases and we ramped up 28 days ago with boosting alternate\nURLs per our call\n\nWe are working very hard to make this happen and should have Christina set up to support us with columns on\na few top sites at no cost moving forward\n\nlam available for a call now or this weekend to review."}]
2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029223.txt_16342
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029223.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "1/4/2015 10:25:34 AM", "subject": null, "body": "bad press in fulll swing . she also claims to have dinner on my island with clinton. lots of details where he\nwas sitting etc however he was NEVER on the island NEVER. its silly, but she has lots of traction"}]
1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029237.txt_16347
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029237.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["oi aT"], "timestamp": "10/25/2015 11:46:21 AM", "subject": null, "body": "another idea for obama. not as good as bio signal intelligence.\ncollider. they will put up the money and build it , but need american tech.\ncollider. his legazy would be great in scinece and the project takes 15 -30 years.\n\nthe cinese are willing to build a new\nif he were to call it the obama xi"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032348.txt_16348
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032348.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Erika Kellerhals", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:12:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I'm so sorry this happened to you. It's terrible. And sad."}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032958.txt_16352
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032958.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "On 15 Jan 2017, at 04:17", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what is trading , now that trump has won. ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 05:51", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what about real trades? what number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadieh"], "timestamp": "Sunday, 15 January 2017 06:22", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i stepped away from the royal jet. if you want to go after the bbj"}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "| just got my G550 - 5176 under contract at $18.5 and it's going to Pre-Purchase inspection on Monday.\nI'm aware that G550 - 5109 was under contract for $17,600,000.\n\nAs a company we have 5 G550, 2 G650 and 1 BBJ buyers.\n\nThat is all | know for now."}, {"sender": "Alireza Ittihadieh", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alireza Ittihadich"], "timestamp": "1/15/2017 2:28:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "new , friend asked yesterday. . one in virginia. paid 8. fixed up with 300k . asking 10"}]
6
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032780.txt_16353
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032780.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 15, 2018, at 6:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "new york soon?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 6:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Unsure. What is up"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed presidnt of united nations , interesting person for you"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "7/17/2018 12:18:53 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Do the Russians have stuff on Trump?\nToday was appalling even by his standards."}]
4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031031.txt_16354
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031031.txt
Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "4/6/2011 10:56:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "what evidence? no real sex.. where is she getting her so called facts"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Beyond anything else, you are my friend. I hope we can both always remember that, no matter what.\n\nAre you coming this weekend at all?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "no it was appreciated. thanks"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:31 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Just so you know.. you can read from bottom up.. you may be mad that I was blunt...\n\nyou.. hope all is well.."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "April 6, 2011 10:28:36 AM MST", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "Okay, will do."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": "haven't heard from\n\nok.. I just sent an additional email which moderates this.. everyone was a victim, including Jeffrey here..\nand there was no happy resolution.. please add.. \"probably everyone was a victim, with no happy resolution\n\nor consequences of these activities\", after \"was the victim in this case.\"."}, {"sender": "Rebecca Watson", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 6, 2011, at 10:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Statement in the Daily Beast?", "body": ""}]
7
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030000.txt_16366
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030000.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:40 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "What was behind this, do you know? Or just nutters?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "al taylor , pr former jerry springer. producer"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 9:45:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "crazy"}]
4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029551.txt_16370
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029551.txt
Re: boosting strategy
[{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "February 7, 2014 at 10:33:16 AM EST", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "We are pushing up the highest authority domains available for \"Jeffrey Epstein\" in general. I had reserved the approach of pushing non-website URLs for a few months because you expressed concern with making sure our URLs are on first page... but I had call w/ Mr. Epstein in the beginning of January and expressed that is a limiting factor for moving Forbes/NYPost as quickly as we'd like.\n\nGetting up different types of results for different folks is required to dislodge the negative placements. Once they are dislodged it is much easier to restore our websites back to the rankings and have our \"ideal\" first page. The reason for this is Google tracks click data on results and as soon as Forbes/NYPost are on second page they will begin a slow death (less clicks on those, more clicks on the ones we have on first page)\n\nFrom there we will see our properties shoot up due to the interlinking between them and the reinforcement we can provide from sites like Harvard, Nat Geo, and any other publications we have influence over. Using the \"short-term\" links is one battle around other pages is just a part of the overall war... You saw how Google was changing up much more dramatically when we had multiple Epstein's on the first page vs. having a saturated first page."}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:47 AM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Hi Tyler,\n\nOk thanks so much for the review. I've cc'd Jeffrey. I'll be in touch this afternoon."}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith", "Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: boosting strategy", "body": "Thank you Christina - I tried your cell a few minutes ago and will be available on mine at your convenience. It is imperative we get a placement out by mid next week in order for us to hit the timeline I spoke to Mr. Epstein about.. The fresh piece needs to come out while we are dislodging the current results (as you are observing now).\n\nMr. Epstein if you have any questions on current status vs. our conversation around Jan 10. please advise - We are continuing to work aggressively to clean up results per our last call. Iam also available to discuss this at your convenience today or over weekend."}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032360.txt_16380
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032360.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jabor Y"], "timestamp": "Thursday, November 10, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "in paris today, headed for new york. . trump gives many new things to do"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Wish you a safe trip back. Congratulations on your new president. You are made to handle all uncertainties \nand meet new challenges. Wish you the best and assure you of all my possible support. I am in contact with \nthe Sharia guys and hope to come back to you next week regarding the e-currency. Look forward to see you \nin Marrakech or in NY if nothing works out."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jabor Y"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 11, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "When marrahesh ? Is it definite"}, {"sender": "Jabor Y", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 11:00:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes around 22nd."}]
4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032964.txt_16389
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032964.txt
Re: TR: update
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 11:37:13 AM", "subject": "Re: TR: update", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 14, 2017 at 8:18:41 PM EST", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\n\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in\nfact, it has started)\n\nall the best"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 février 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\n\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach."}]
4