thread_id
stringlengths
37
43
source_file
stringlengths
35
37
subject
stringlengths
0
231
messages
stringlengths
88
34.9k
message_count
int64
1
42
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032374.txt_16391
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032374.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11/16/2016 6:48:02 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Hey Jeffrey!! \nHow are you ? Happy abt Trump being elected or not? \nI hope you meet Christian in NY. He is genius in tech and also my boyfriend :-) so I will be travelling \nto NY often to see him and can catch up with you.. \nDid you think of any lawyering job I can do for you after I graduate from Berkeley and take NY bar ? ;-)\nHugs,"}]
1
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026975.txt_16400
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026975.txt
The Inside Scoop on Trump’s White House — Michael Wolff and Matthew d’Ancona In Conversation
[{"sender": "How To Academy", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/13/2019 10:17:44 AM", "subject": "The Inside Scoop on Trump’s White House — Michael Wolff and Matthew d’Ancona In Conversation", "body": "The Inside Scoop on Trump’s White House — Michael Wolff and Matthew d’ Ancona In Conversation\n\nMICHAEL WOLFF\n\nBuy Tickets"}]
1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025835.txt_16401
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025835.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Reid's guy went down on all 7 counts."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "and thats after turning down misdeameors? whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yep. And now he is a repeat offender."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:00 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "double whoops"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Uh, yeah. We will now go through a period of self-reflection and despair."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reid or governor"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gov is not jewish"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "of course not , he wouldnt have been so stupid."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 3:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Correct. One time, maybe. Twice, no way."}]
9
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025606.txt_16410
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025606.txt
Re: $25K from ASU
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Tm good. Good luck!\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Mar 4, 2019, at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry . it seems im a symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types . im your boy . at least for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:52 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "That would be great. I’ve been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:48", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "1can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. how are you ?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:56", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "yes, hes not beholden to ME too :). how should farkas give the money"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 07:14", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Can he give a gift to me at MIT?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "What is the size of the gift?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 07:25", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "100-200"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito <a>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6 2019 01:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}]
10
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022203.txt_16415
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022203.txt
Screen shot
[{"sender": "Al seckel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/11/2010 9:01:17 PM", "subject": "Screen shot", "body": "This is a screen shot of a google search on your name taken about one minute ago, and this is BEFORE the next big sweep. I UNDERSTAND your point about \"one thing kills me,\" but the daily beast article is gone, the other ones, including the powerful Huffington Post, are about to be pushed off. And, out stuff is on top."}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032289.txt_16417
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032289.txt
Re: Trump
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "no place else to invest for alpha, your children are rich"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:49:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "If you knew Trump was going to win, how would you position your portfolio?"}]
7
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026469.txt_16424
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026469.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["HS"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Lisa will call.\n\nPeople are saying resignation of justice Dept number 3 is big deal."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:33 AM -0500", "subject": "Re:", "body": "2? What number r u at?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 10, 2018, at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "The list of officials frequently discussed in the texts who are no longer in their jobs seems to grow by the day.\nIt includes former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by Trump; former Deputy Director Andrew\nMcCabe; Comey's chief of staff, James Rybicki; FBI General Counsel James Baker; as well as Strzok, who\nwas booted off the special counsel investigation and sent to a job in the FBI's personnel div. laufman and\nrachel brand. not one surprise if would have heard bannon"}, {"sender": "LHS <lhsummers@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Saw and liked Woody piece. The columnist is Good.\nDon't follow your note. What texts"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["HS"], "timestamp": "2/10/2018 5:23:19 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "page and strokz"}]
5
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033081.txt_16425
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033081.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Stephen Hanson"], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 1:15:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032757.txt_16429
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032757.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 3:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid Po", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Am | seeing you tomorrow morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, March 24, 2018 8:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes 730?"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid TE", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 11:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Later possible? Need my beauty sleep"}]
4
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023232.txt_16430
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023232.txt
null
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "you I and Brad karp sit together if you think it would be helpful. . I would like to send him this email, with\nyour consent of course. Ifthe transactions were never consummated , 1 would not be owed a dime,\nhowever , the expected fee was known up front. , the detailed step by step plan was followed and\noverseen by me, the amount that I had requested before the transaction had even begun, had already\nbeen heavily discounted, out of friendship, . I believe the decision re only paying 20 m has frankly , left\nme felling quite uneasy. and colors the view about the Athene or Rothschild transaction.\n\nyou've agreed that\n\nYour office is a multi billion dollar responsibility. your children will inherit it , in order to oversee their\nfinancial lives- I feel for you, truly ,but the facts are the facts, your ceo ( Brad) has provided one bad\ndocument after another for over a year , no getting away from it,, badcash flows nonewIT, each\ntime with \" its gettting better\" no in fact -! itsnot. - the excuse, that Brad is not the numbers guy, is\nludicrous. of course he didnt actually prepare the statements. - no ceo would ,- but over and over he\npresented them to you and me, after , holding them back for his personal review multiple times and after\nmultiple drafts. weeks of his editing, the consistant but \"inexplicable \"missing the obvious serious\nerrors .( gaming ) inaccuracies, ( cashflow ) and mistakes (tax returns). why, ?! the simple answer is\nthat at best, he is ac minus, (note. I, like you ,also give points for effort. )-! an elegant art partnership\ngone fallow. ??!!I and its core reason to exist. not used ? no docs for plane?, still ! why? no docs for\ndecantings why? the docs for deal | received last night , \"no docs at all for deal 2, the biggest \". why\nwasn't Tom brought in, after 4 times of my incessant reminders i spoke to him, he knows little of either\ntransaction except for over view. never saw pahidon anything except projections until yesterday ? ?and\nthis after your clear admonition etc. re the trading accounts no activity, at all,\n\nBarry Cohen is great. more like him please .\nyou asked ,- I did my best trying to train your brad chosen people in the face of my telling you that they\nwere never going to be more than c-minuses, thousands of emails thousands? Brad at its head . you\ncan't as aceo, have an accountant give you multiple pages with the most important numbers missing\naltogether and not notice, you and I saw the errrors right away ,as did my very junior bookeeper after\nonly a cursory glance. He told me he didnt know the details of his note? ! , my guess is that he wanted to\npay less. no more than that, any other story is blather. its silly. Talk to richard yourself.\nre your estate. Yes another Brad issue - your will, needs revision. the tenants in common structure I\nassume Alan has carefully walked you through. it is way overdue, needed and exciting. I won't list the\nmore serious issues in an email but we can speak over the weekend.\n\nHow can I help? We agreed at the time when you hired Castrucci , that when you fired him, I would\nbear no responsibility because it was clear that he shouldnt be hired. brad and you both said ,\" its on us\",\nbut... the equivalent of your art consultant pointing to a picasso and calling ita renoir. then a brancusi\nand calling it a michaelangelo. those were the types of erros that 1 saw immediatily, you said give them\nmore time. at least they saw it was a painting and not a photo?\n\nbeing weaned of our biz /pay realtionship has been our mutual goal. However since novemebr, you\nchose to do so by ignoring’ our agreement re, phaidon,and your oft stated commitment to me of large\npayments for large value, (37 percent was our number ). chose to pay me anumber picked by what\nappears to be only by whim,- have yet to justify it except for telling me that you and Brad Karp talked.."}]
1
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023226.txt_16436
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023226.txt
Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:59 AM", "subject": "Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.", "body": "1 did the paul weiss bill get paid ??? 2. Talk to me before signing anything today important\n\n10m paid today to gratitude america, a 501 c 3, willl make last year complete. 20 million paid today ftc . 10 million july 15 5 million sept 30. , 5 million jan 1 for all of 16. tax savings paid at 37 percent . of net. savings. 50 million credit. net. so 150 million free. 600 savings 225 million owed. - 50 credit, 175 owed. 600 savings 225 million owed. - 50 credit, 175 owed."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 6:36 PM", "subject": "Fwd: leon DO NOT SEND, hand deliver.", "body": "Transaction complete !\n\nWhen we had our meeting in your home in Bedford. You asked me for my help. I told you multiple times that i thought it was a very bad idea, in that I preferred to have no financial interactions. I dont have many friends and didnt want money to interefer with our unique relationship. For five years you had the kind but goofy Eileen Alexandersson managing your accounting , legal, investments. reporting, trusts etc. When I told you in no uncertain terms that I firmly believed she was incompetent you admonished me for \" speaking out of both sides of my mouth\". With regard Brad Wechsler , there is no \" both sides. \". IT have consistantly maintained since day one that he was highly unsuited for the job. When you initially asked me to help convince him to take the role , promising him a postion to manage mirage investments I sent you a note saying instead you should pay up and get first class people. I have reiterated the same message for over a year now. . Brad , not me was tasked with hiring new people and as you wanted him to take ownership of the staff,he conducted many interviews. you may recall that as late as may, you told him in my presence that he had had six months and had not hired anyone. since then I have rectified errors in sales tax, use tax, income tax, fbar reporting, 1031 reporting, 8 million of deductions. ,( last nov ) 11 million found in dormant accounts and 4 million in the drawer. errors in cash flow both personal and Phaidon. Oversight on new grats first at 22 and then at 19 that were done without my consulatation were resolved only as aresult of my intervention. . 600 million in after tax savings was just accomplished.\n\nWith Brad out of the office and unable to run his usual interference , the level of his total and utter incompetence was brought clearly , front and center. He may be a step up from Eileen, but, if he is , then itis certainly not by much, A major difference is that Eileen knew she was over her head. Brad struts his stupiditly whenever he gets a chance.\n\nA critical example. - Though you and I have spent many many hours discussing the importance of care and attention to details and mechanics. with regard Phaidon I was not shown one single document , not one.!! Brad wanted to keep it private between he, and his so called\" advisors\" however as he was out of the office during the most important transaction of the year, I did get to spend time with joslin Joe and john, - the situation in your office is totally ludicrous - to summarize - the list I provided to Brad last December - of things I thought were a priority to get done - _ still remains in the whole unresolved.\n\nThe IT, is virtually untouched and is still in desperate need of a format - reporting flawed cumbersome and inaccurate . all done by hand as one -off exercises , when either you or brad ask for it - airplane: re structure, (my only suggested priority in june ) is really ,no further ahead, ,consultants up the kazoo but nothing at all done.( the office was told by Brad not to share the outside proposals with me - brad has no"}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033095.txt_16441
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033095.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 1:58:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-did-trump-and-clinton-pal-jeffrey-epstein-escape-metoo"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030724.txt_16442
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030724.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/12/2018 10:51:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Have I been trained by you to fly commercial ?? What do you think ?? \nI am in London tomorrow and can have Tea with Bannon - but I guess he's got better things to do...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12 Jul 2018, at 12:44", "subject": "Re:", "body": "my assistant \nlondon. fun \nalso going. you guys are nuts. . are you flying comercial? bannon and trump in"}, {"sender": "David Stern", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "On my way to Munich \nWeekend going to Russia to World Cup Final."}]
3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028854.txt_16444
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028854.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014, at 1:21 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You need to talk to boss"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Agreed, but I need to be prepared to say yes before I talk to him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "understood. it comes down to high risk /reward / low risk / reward. professional , emotional. and fiinancial"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 7:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Most girls do not have to worry about this crap."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 19, 2014 7:48 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "\"girls?\",, careful 1 will renew an old habit, . this week, thiel, summers,bill burns, gordon brown, jagland, ( council of europe and nobel chairman ). mongolia pres , hardeep puree ( india), boris ( gates). jabor ( qatar ). sultan ( dubai, ), kosslyn ( harvard), leon black, woody. you are a welcome guest at any..... also if you think there are interesting people in town, everyone here for climate summit , clinton ,security council, holy shit im on] for next 30 minutes"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/19/2014 11:54:57 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Doesn't look like you are prioritizing your schedule very effectively.....how are you going to manage all of that? this is unga week so the boss will be in town too.....I'll be here all week -- you may get sick of me....just sat down on the train so can't talk freely."}]
6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026620.txt_16448
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026620.txt
FW: The Iran Nuclear Deal
[{"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Allen West", "Rafael Bardaji", "Philip Kafka", "Lisa Albert [LA@unknown.com]", "Janet Kafka", "James Ramsey", "ACT for America", "John Zouzelka-Cell", "Joel Dunn", "Nate McClain", "Neil Anderson", "Henry Hortenstine", "Bennett Schmidt", "Marcie Brown", "Jeff Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Michael Stechel", "Buchholtz", "Michael Horowitz", "Bennett Greenwald", "Uri Fouzailov", "Rita Hortenstine", "Forrest Miller", "Val Sherman", "Mark Epstein", "Taal Safdie", "Nate White", "Gary Gross", "Marshall Funk", "Michael"], "timestamp": "8/4/2015 10:23:22 PM", "subject": "Fw: The Iran Nuclear Deal", "body": "Please spend 2 minutes and watch this dennis prager video on iran deal. And then forward it if you agree. If not, I understand and just delete. Respectfully, terry"}, {"sender": "Mike Cohen", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:00:42 +0000", "subject": "FW: The Iran Nuclear Deal", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mike Cohen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Monday, August 03, 2015 7:16 PM", "subject": "FW: The Iran Nuclear Deal", "body": "Dear Friends, PLEASE watch this very important short and incredibly clear video regarding the Iran deal. If you have not yet called your congressmen and asked other friends and relatives to do so, PLEASE do that as well. The wellbeing of your children and grandchildren depend upon it! Mike"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025329.txt_16453
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025329.txt
Fwd: Manson Girls / Acid Trip Agreement
[{"sender": "Lonnie Martin", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "January 16, 2019 at 6:50:44 AM PST", "subject": "Re: Manson Girls / Acid Trip Agreement", "body": "Hi Paul. \n\nThanks so much for sharing both your note to Steven and your latest Manson essay with me. It's always wild to read that piece. I have parts of it memorized at this point. \n\nAfter reading your comment about vibes from the movie, I feel like I have some explaining to do. This is all stream of consciousness writing so take it on merit, I guess. No harm is meant. \n\nAs 'The Last of the Manson Girls' got closer to completion, I was insanely nervous about showing it to you. I knew it there was very little in it that was \"Truth\" in terms of minute details. What I did was take the broad strokes of your essay and make it into the \"beats\" of my story. \n\nFor example, Sandy's invitation to take a bath formed the spine of the \"mermaid\" scene. Squeaky's line, \"Manson never took anybody who wasn't already discarded by the society\" formed the spin of the animated fever dream where she talks about her father. The visit to Merrick was a good place to get into some of my views about conspiracy and the human mind's ability to latch on to anything to avoid unpleasant facts. Squeaky's line \"Well what do you expect from me. I'm crazy\" was obviously later then this meeting, but it was just too good a line to let go. I didn't use elements of your essay that made actual filming and production tougher. For example, the interlude in your essay where you went to a home of friend of the family and smoked weed for example became \"you\" smoking weed at their pad. \n\nI added in beats, character traits and dialgoue that helped form that \"dramatic arc\" that works in movies so well. You and the Manson Women must have talked about far more than you mentioned in your essay, but I took liberties with what was said and how it was presented. Maybe I should have reached out to you about these conversations. I guess I was afraid of the Truth getting in the way of a good story. \n\nAll the Mae Brussel stuff is there because its seemed a simple (Ha!) way to explain to the audience \"Why is Paul going there?\" Squeaky asking for the LSD rather than you bringing it was, again, an easy and short way to explain to the audience why LSD was involved. \n\nThere's a lot of my personal experience in the film. I *did* have a panic attack while on LSD and passed out hugging a toilet. (I didn't however go to a desert/beach and talk to futuristic Squeaky Fromme, though I was in the desert when it happened.) I once had a very contentious creative friendship with one of my best friends who is a friend no longer. That seemed to mirror some of your relationship with Lenny Bruce. I also felt like your relationship with Lenny had so much to do with your evolution as a writer, satirist, and comedian that it seemed proper to put that in there. I wrestled a *long* time over even mentioning your daughter because it seemed more of a personal invasion than you had bargained for. However, based on your memoir, it was obvious how important that relationship and aspect of your life was to you. \n\nThe smooching with Squeaky isn't meant to be any kind of bawdy Enquirer scandal. It's tied to the idea that by the end of the movie this \"Paul\" isn't scared of her. The kiss is mentioned as being symbolic of acceptance and despite all their philosophical differences, \"Paul\" and Squeaky in the film find a way to \"accept\" each other. \"We've got a find a way to love the people we hate.\" is the statement I always say at talkbacks when people ask me what the ending of the movie means. \n\nThe movie was conceived and made as a response to my own feelings of doubt about myself, and my growing social irrevelavance as I age. (I turned 40 while making it.) It's about coming to terms with the mistakes I've made and the hubris that caused them. \n\nIt's also about resistance fatigue. It asks (in a roundabout way), \"What happens if the good guys *do* lose the war?\" I saw similarities between how the protest wing of the counterculture may have felt in the wake of RFK, the Weathermen and the SLA, and having the whole movement for something bigger start to go sour as it mainstreamed. The similarities between Nixon and Trump are so obvious, I feel like I don't even need to mention them. I saw similarities in your spiritual journey to mine. \"Paul Krassner\" in my script was in some ways a vessel to project all my own hang-ups onto. I suppose that's an unfair burden to put on you. \n\nI don't know if this all sounds like excuse-making, but it's my way of saying that I certainly don't want to \"break a legacy.\" I think the work you did with \"The Realist\" is important and paved the way for the Onion, The Daily Show, and society's general acceptance of raw, cutting satire in the world of politics and journalism. The last thing I would ever want to do is have that be tainted. Film has that power of course. The medium by it's nature hypnotizes, and has a funny way of clouding up the truth. Fiction becomes history and vice versa. \n\nMore than anything, I don't want you to feel taken advantage of or disrespected. \n\nI probably should have explained this to you earlier. I probably should have called and had a conversation with you about it, and I'm happy to still do that. \n\nThank you again or allowing me to tell this story, even through my own distorted lens. \n\nAll the best, \nLonnie"}, {"sender": "paul krassner [paulkrassner@roadrunner.com]", "recipients": ["Nancy Cain", "Tom", "Steven Gaydos", "George Krassner", "Holly Krassner Dawson", "Marie Moneysmith", "Linda W. Grossman", "Daniel Dawson", "Danny Goldberg Caryl Ratner", "Kevin Bright", "Michael Simmons", "Samuel Leff", "Bob Fass", "Lynnie Tofte Fass", "Lee Quarnstrom", "Barb Cowles"], "timestamp": "1/16/2019 7:50:41 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Manson Girls / Acid Trip Agreement", "body": ""}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033313.txt_16460
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033313.txt
null
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/22/2018 1:12:21 PM", "subject": null, "body": "see video at the bottom of the page as someone at rally printed a picture of you and trump together\n\nhttps://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/watch-trump-kicks-out-protesters-from-rally"}]
1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026455.txt_16476
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026455.txt
Fwd: Plane management
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "10/3/2017 12:26:10 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Plane management", "body": "does this mean that under their brilliant structure you will have a profit and pay tax for using your plane??! . call me re other issue please we need to make a decision today"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:21 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "It won’t take long to do. We’re just swamped. I’ll get something to you when I can.\n\nMy biggest fear about taking this job is that there wouldn’t be enough to do. You told me that concern was crazy. You were right."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "can you share?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "On our to-do list, but back of the envelope, we satisfied ourselves that after depreciation, we would show a profit. (In part because Apollo charter payments factor in depreciation.)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "did anyone provide you with a biz plan that shows the proposal will generat a profit ?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. I recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven’t heard back from him. I think I talked him out of automating the divans. I agreed with what you said about that."}]
6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031412.txt_16477
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031412.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeevacation@gmail.com", "recipients": ["Gmax gmax1@ellmax.com"], "timestamp": "5/18/2011 10:37:36 AM", "subject": null, "body": "do you have photos from our clinton trip to africa"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033307.txt_16493
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033307.txt
trump getting RNC bounce...
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/25/2016 4:28:09 PM", "subject": "trump getting RNC bounce...", "body": "Monday, July 25\n\nRace/Topic (Click to Sort) Poll\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. CNN/ORC\nClinton\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. CBS News\nClinton\nGeneral Election: Trump vs.\n\nClinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein ee\nGeneral Election: Trump vs. CBS News\n\nClinton vs. Johnson\n\nResults\n\nTrump 48, Clinton 45\n\nTrump 44, Clinton 43\n\nClinton 39, Trump 44, Johnson 9,\nStein 3\n\nClinton 39, Trump 40, Johnson 12\n\nSpread\n\nTrump +3\n\nTrump +1\n\nTrump +5\n\nTrump +1"}]
1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029431.txt_16506
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029431.txt
thank you to friends of Poetry in America
[{"sender": "Lisa Nw", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/17/2017 7:18:33 PM", "subject": "thank you to friends of Poetry in America", "body": "Dear Jeffrey: (and please see personal P.S. under my signature!)\n\nIam writing now, as I have for the last several years, to update you on the work that Poetry in America and Verse Video Education have done in the\nlast year. Below, I detail the accomplishments of 2017 and, below that, some projects I hope to complete in 2018. But first: my deepest thanks to you\nwho have contributed financially, intellectually, creatively, and in so many other ways to Poetry in America’s work.\n\nSome of you receiving this letter have generously supported Verse Video Education, the independent non-profit production company (a 501¢3) I\nfounded in 2015. Verse Video Education now partners with WGBH television as well as with Harvard University (and others) to make the highest\nquality educational media for broad audiences. Whether you supported me by sharing your own interpretive talents on camera or by helping me to\nland elusive talent; whether you provided me funding, or equipment, or business wisdom, or organizational advice,\n\nor a space in which to film, or just plain interest in the work-- I am immensely grateful. Making media-- and especially television-- is complex, and\nexpensive, and I could not have navigated the road from professor to professor/producer/director without you.\n\nOthers of you have supported my humanities work at Harvard, and, in particular, Harvard's efforts to provide distance education of all kinds. Now\n(along with partners at the Bok Center, HarvardX, the Graduate School of Education, and the Extension School), I produce educational content for a\nwide global community of learners. Increasingly, Poetry in America not only distributes state-of-the-art humanities content within and beyond\nHarvard’s gates, but we also train, mentor, and support a growing number of Harvard undergraduates and graduate students with interests in\neducation, media, and the public humanities. These students now comprise a vibrant community of young Harvard humanists gaining experience in\nonline teaching, curriculum design, educational policy, international education, video production, video editing, and more. By supporting Poetry in\nAmerica, you\n\nalso support forward-looking humanities education at Harvard. (Update: those of you who are alumni of Harvard College are now eligible to receive\nclass credit for your donations to Poetry in America projects.)\n\nIt's thrilling for me to report that our two largest efforts of the last few years are both coming to fruition.\n\nPoetry in America’s 13-episode television series, along with its parallel PBS LearningMedia Collection for educators, will air on PBS stations\nnationwide beginning in April 2018. Click here for a sneak peek at our 90-second series trailer (password: Poetry90). Featuring such guest\ninterpreters as those in the trailer-- and dozens of others-- each half-hour episode of the series offers a deep dive into one important American poem.\nDiscussions on a second season have begun!\n\nMeanwhile, our Harvard partners at the Extension School and the Graduate School of Education have agreed, for a limited time, to make the full\nsuite of Poetry in America online courses accessible to learners all over the world, offering a steep reduction in course fees. Students and teachers\nworldwide can now take any Poetry in America course-- at any credit level-- for $200. (Take a look at our 2018 offerings here.) Those of you who\nsupport individual schools or school networks: please note that through 2018 groups of five teachers or students can take any Poetry in America\ncourse for $1000 and receive graduate, undergraduate, or professional development credit-- and, that group’s facilitator can receive free tuition.\nPlease feel free to distribute our offerings to educators whose work you support anywhere in the world.\n\nHarvard’s highly unusual decision to slash tuition for the next year follows the great success of Poetry in America’s first course for educators--\nPoetry in America for Teachers: The City from Whitman to Hip Hop. In recognition of this course, David Coleman (president of the College Board)\nhas offered support to allow us to continue developing and providing access to the highest quality educational and professional development\nhumanities content. In 2018, as I lay out below, we seek to expand the scope of our offerings, and to work with our many partners to broaden access\nto all learners.\n\nThank you for your support for this work, and warmest best to you all in this holiday season.\n\nSincerely,\nLisa"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028976.txt_16508
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028976.txt
woody and deadline
[{"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/4/2016 6:25:26 PM", "subject": "woody and deadline", "body": "Dear Jeffrey, \nWoody has received from his lawyer some questions I asked in in response to the agreement Irwin Tenenbaum \nsent me... .1 found that that agreement generous and reasonable (!), and I'm excited to go forward, but I do need \nthose clarifications. We can absolutely agree that we will not give Woody larger or more important billing than \nBill Clinton or Joe Biden, and that I'd like to come to him to renew our agreement after five years. \nThe Harvard week of content in which Woody will appear, if we can sign this, needs to be edited in the next \nweek-10 days. We are out of time, which is why I'm writing \nThe television show has been picked up by American Public Television, they will distribute nationally, and \nthey've asked for another 5 episodes. I so want Woody to be one of those. \nI'd like to see the haiku written by computer. Haiku is not that hard. I'd like to see an elegy written by \ncomputer."}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033298.txt_16515
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033298.txt
Trump Wall Street
[{"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/22/2016 4:15:25 PM", "subject": "Trump Wall Street", "body": "Any big finance names out there supporting trump that we have not\nheard about? We are trying to get an angle on who is supporting and\nwho is not."}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031637.txt_16518
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031637.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "Saturday, November 5, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "unfortunatlely , too much work around the election. I will need to cancel doha before the 9th, it is soooo crazy. many stories to tell when i see you. when do you leave.? I feel badly about changes at the last minute , but i hope you understand."}, {"sender": "Jabor Y.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 2:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "No worries. I understand your situation. I will leave on the 9th will be back on 13th. Again leave on the 16 and back on 18th. I had fixed an appoint for you on Monday with Shk. Hamad. Which I shall cancel and fix later. Let me know when you plan again your trip to Doha."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "11/5/2016 1:38:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thank you for being understanding, I hate canceling. but i will explain when isee you. . the states will be in turmoil for awhile no matter who wins, its also possible that there will be court battles to decide . like bush gore.. one thing is for sure, women are angry, they have more power, and race relations are sensitve."}]
3
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026829.txt_16520
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026829.txt
Fwd: Alert: FIRPTA and REIT Reform Provisions in the New Tax Law Open Door to Increased Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Property Interests
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2015 12:52:15 AM", "subject": "U.S. Real Property Interests", "body": "Richard Kahn\nHBRK Associates Inc.\n\n575 Lexington Avenue, 4th Floor\nNew York, NY 10022\n\nTel\nCell"}, {"sender": "Sadis & Goldberg Tax Group", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "December 23, 2015 at 3:02:13 PM EST", "subject": "Alert: FIRPTA and REIT Reform Provisions in the New Tax Law Open Door to Increased Foreign Investment in U.S. Real Property Interests", "body": "FIRPTA and REIT Reform Provisions in\nNew Tax Law Open Door to Increased\nForeign Investment in U.S. Real\nProperty Interests\n\nFor further information about this Alert,\n\nplease contact:\n\nSteven Etkind\nPartner"}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032838.txt_16528
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032838.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Merwin Dela cruz", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, May 14, 2019, 5:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "presidnet trump is going to be at our neighbors on thurs, so dont be surprsised if secret service check in"}, {"sender": "Merwin Dela cruz", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "5/14/2019 10:16:30 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you for the heads up sir."}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032458.txt_16533
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032458.txt
RE: update
[{"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "2/10/2017 5:40:45 PM", "subject": "RE: update", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "vendredi 10 février 2017 18:40:10", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number | should reach.\n\nNot sure what got lost in translation here: never had the intention to go to any art fair or art show or\nanything of the kind.\n\nAll the artists we have in mind or send to you are people we have direct connections with. Not just their\nstudio, but also their home. They are people the work of whom we follow, and many of them are already\nfriendly (Arianna, Cali have had dinner or stayed home).\n\nThe idea is absolutely to have an impact on the ecosystem and to make a difference by supporting great\nartists when they need it.\n\nGalleries references are important, because galleries allow artist to reach a broader audience. We would go\ndirectly to the source.\n\nThis is why it's important for me to go to LA or Berlin (or elsewhere) because those artists are not rich yet,\nthey dont travel so much. They belong to a scene, and it does make a big difference to them if you connect in\nperson.\n\nThe spirit is to have an impact on young, talented folks, and absolutely to stay at the source.\n\nOnce again, not sure was drifted away from this in communication"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032228.txt_16535
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032228.txt
Heads up
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/16/2015 1:00:36 AM", "subject": "Heads up", "body": "I hear CNN planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you--either on air or in scrum afterwards."}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031599.txt_16536
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031599.txt
Re: Trump
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 4:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "would you like photso of donald and girls in bikinis in my kitchen."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon [likely landon.thomas@nytimes.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Now everyone coming to me thinking I have juicy info on you and Trump.\n\nBecause of this.\n\n\"I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy,\" Trump booms from a speakerphone. \"He's a lot of fun to be with. It is\neven said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it\nJeffrey enjoys his social life.\"\n\nThat story will never die."}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 5:50 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Yes!!!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Landon Thomas Jr"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 9:53:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "hawain tropic girl\nlauren petrella <"}]
4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033122.txt_16538
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033122.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack LANG"], "timestamp": "9/26/2018 5:14:42 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "tom pritzker has asked if you have ideas re the Pritzker Prize"}, {"sender": "Jack LANG", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:56 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nHave you received my email about Serge Moati's film project?\n\nOur recent conversation on Trump was exciting.\n\nOnce again you are right.\n\nSee you soon,\n\nWith my friendship,\n\nJack"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jack", "tom", "tom jacques"], "timestamp": "Le 12 sept. 2018 a 13:24", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Jack- tom - tom jacques"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030693.txt_16539
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030693.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:38 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "how was it.? why dont you stop by today so we can script tomorrow. - assuming no change. . prefer no details on email"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:42 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "All good. I am everybody's darling. Have to keep reminding people that I am actually quite unpopular. Apparently thing of the past--for now (excepting among a small circle of journalists). Ira Rosen, a 60 Minutes producer and a friend of Bannon's, came with a message from SB: \"You own me a few million.\" Rosen also says he believes SB now weighing the strategy of making a formal and public break with Trump. I can't get together today because I have to leave for DC at 11AM to speak to 800 book buyers (not to mention pre-signing 800 books). Then tomorrow AM to LA to do Bill Maher show. Making money is hard work."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Great. I m thrilled for you. At the moment he's coming tomorrow night"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:15 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "im off sat to europe mid east etc. return around the 30"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "don't forget I want to go with you to the mid east sometime...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "why dont we also ask harvey weinstein to join to make sure we dont get any press :)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:20:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ha! On another note, this Woody thing is going south very quickly. Planning to speak to them this morning."}]
8
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022931.txt_16549
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022931.txt
Fwd: ATTORNEY- CLIENT PRIVILEGE
[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemnler"], "timestamp": "Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 3:03 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY- CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "AS just received."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, April 22 2015 07:34 PM", "subject": "Fwd: ATTORNEY- CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": ""}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032302.txt_16563
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032302.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/1/2016 2:09:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can chat now io: if not, when works?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 5:34 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "time to talk today, ? now that the book is a dud, no trump, clinton ete. I woudl like to move forward."}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030863.txt_16574
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030863.txt
on trump [C]
[{"sender": "Daniel Sabba", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/21/2015 1:31:09 PM", "subject": "on trump [C]", "body": "http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/donald-trump-is-the-worlds-greatest-troll/\n\nthought provoking stats\n\nThe Republican Field Has Been Trumped\n\nGoogle News hits and Google searches (June 14, 2015, through July \n12, 2015), compared with Betfair odds (as of July 19, 2015)\n\nTrump \nBush \nChristie \nWalker \nJindal \nCruz \nRubio \nPaul \nKasich \nH uckabee \nGraham \nPerry \nFiorina \nCarson \nSantorum \nPataki \n\nMedia coverage \n(Google News hits) \n1111 13 \n• 9 \n8 \n16 \nI 4 \nI 4 \n12 \n12 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n1 \n<1 \n4696 \n\nPublic interest Chance of winning \n(Google searches) nomination (Betfair) \n•9 \n13 \n15 \n1 3 \n13 \n12 \n13 \n11 \n11 \n11 \n11 \n1 3 \n<1 \n<1 \n6296 \nI 5 \n1111 ____ 5 `I \nI 3 \nl<1 \n13 \n13 \n16 \n18 \n\nFIVETHIRTYEIGHT \nSOURCE GOGGLE. PREDICTWISE. BETFAIR"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032464.txt_16575
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032464.txt
Fwd: TR: update
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Etienne Binant", "Lang, Caroline"], "timestamp": "Friday 10 February 2017 18:40", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "yes, lets start. . yes we are on. sorry with trump around its been very crazy busy"}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re: update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey\n\nHappy to talk to you almost anytime today until around 3PM. Just tell me what number I should reach."}, {"sender": "Etienne Binant", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "February 14, 2017 at 8:18:41 PM EST", "subject": "TR: update", "body": "Dear Darren\n\nLatest from JE (indeed, encouraging)\n\nPlease let me know when account/wire are active, and how I can access internet banking and start the ball (in fact, it has started)\n\nall the best"}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "2/15/2017 11:11:40 AM", "subject": "Fwd: TR: update", "body": "!"}]
4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032214.txt_16576
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032214.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lajcak Miroslav/MINISTER/MZV"], "timestamp": "March 24, 2018 6:39 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-close-is-donald-trump-to-a-psychiatric-breakdown?ref=home"}, {"sender": "Miroslav Lajčák", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 5:55 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Thanks! I think we've heard enough proofs on this subject today:)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "3/24/2018 10:07:32 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Agreed"}]
3
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018197.txt_16578
IMAGES-004-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018197.txt
null
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/15/2013 4:52:58 PM", "subject": null, "body": "take-it-or-leave-it deal by the U.S. on the\nnuclear issue is the wrong strategy\n\nRay Takeyh\n\nFebruary 14, 2013 -- On Feb. 26, the United States and Iran will once\nmore resume their diplomatic ritual, in the so-called six-party talks, over\nIran's disputed nuclear program. As the two perennial adversaries eye one\nanother, there are competing paradigms about how to deal with Tehran.\n\nAn emerging school of thought suggests that the best means of \"testing\"\nIran is to offer it a final nuclear agreement that presumably promises\nmeasurable relief from sanctions for significant Iranian concessions. Iran's\nfailure to grasp such an offer would then conclusively demonstrate to both\ndomestic and international audiences that the cause of the impasse is not\nAmerican belligerence but Iranian truculence.\n\nBut this approach fails to recognize that an arms-control process is\nnecessarily an incremental one, nor does it offer a practical substitute to\nthe existing step-by-step diplomacy.\n\nIran's nuclear program encompasses a vast complex of enrichment\nfacilities, centrifuge construction plants, uranium extraction companies\nand thousands of scientists working in university and government\nlaboratories. Iran is enriching uranium at both 5% and 20% levels,\nexperimenting with high-velocity centrifuges and seemingly in the process\nof constructing additional enrichment facilities.\n\nSuch a multilayered, multifaceted program can be dealt with only on a\npiecemeal basis, as the technical details and rules for inspections are too\ncomplex to be addressed in a single agreement.\n\nMoreover, should the United States offer Iran a final deal, Tehran still has\na right to contest and negotiate its provisions and offer counterproposals."}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032804.txt_16579
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032804.txt
Re: Introduction
[{"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["Jeffrey", "Neal"], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Jeffrey - Neal\n\nNeither of you requires introduction. I've known Jeffrey 28 years and this isn't a joke -\nDonald Trump introduced us. I first met Neal in 16 years ago when Bob Pirie introduced\nUS ...\n\nNeal will be visiting NYC end of month.\n\nI think you would both enjoy spending time together -\n\nThanks to you both for always supporting me.\n\nYou are both copied.\n\nMelanie"}, {"sender": "Neal Kassel", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018 at 8:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Thanks Melanie\n\nJeffery — look forward to meeting you. Wish Melanie was with us. I will be in New York from Tuesday the\n25th through Friday, 28 September. Let me know if you are available.\n\nBe well."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Neal Kassel"], "timestamp": "Sep 3, 2018, at 8:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "yes, will be in town , coordiante atime closer . look forward to it"}, {"sender": "Neal Kassel", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/4/2018 12:50:33 AM", "subject": "Re: Introduction", "body": "Will do\n\nDoes Leslie do your schedule?"}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029498.txt_16591
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029498.txt
Trump set to dine with law professor Alan Dershowitz
[{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Gordon Getty", "david haig", "Norman Finkelstein"], "timestamp": "4/11/2018 2:18:04 AM", "subject": "Trump set to dine with law professor Alan Dershowitz", "body": "My God\nthat Jewish Nazi is joining to join our Narcissistic Psychopath for dinner—how appropriate\nhttps://www.cnn.com/2018/04/10/politics/donald-trump-alan-dershowitz/index.html"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028786.txt_16596
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028786.txt
null
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/23/2012 2:54:42 PM", "subject": null, "body": "dershowiz tells me obama called him to ask him what was going on in israel. ? we should discuss."}]
1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026290.txt_16598
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026290.txt
Re: Hello
[{"sender": "[aE", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "Gotti was an anomaly because of his personality (some agents loved him and some hated him); but I get your point. Couple of things:\n\n1. This the investigation of the President. It is only as good as public confidence in it can be (subtracting the conspiracy theorists on both sides). We just can't have someone with this kind of political bias as a lead investigator. But more importantly, he was not alone. He was just stupid enough to show it in office emails. We don't yet know what his private emails showed. Strzok, however, says that he met with McCabe - the number 2 guy in the FBI - and in his office discussed how best to stop Trump from becoming President. That just cannot be tolerated. Plus, if I find any evidence of personal or other extraneous animus in any case by any agent or prosecutor, I view it as an"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "we're on the same team. —strzok. testimony was that discussions with lovers , often include embellishments. and not indicative of non professionalism. I believe he said nothing more than it referenced \" andys office\". . paige says andy was there. how many other people were there ? were strzok and paige. off in the corner talking to each other. was mccabe on the phone? you know that taking emails alone is not meaningful. . isnt it a but much to say that prosecutors that have strong opinions . should be looked out with skepticism? who doesnt have bias. . strzok had many neg hillary opinions.. - michael cohen. michael flynn.. are not fictions created by mueller? how are you ?"}, {"sender": "Ev rotc", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:23 AM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "By the way, your friend dershowitz is in hog heaven. He gets on every talk show on this issue, then he writes a piece about his friends now hate him, and today the Times has a piece about him writing a piece about how his friends hate him. He might just be the Kim Kardashian of the legal scene."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "7/4/2018 1:40:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Hello", "body": "One guy in the Times article on him got it about right i think.\n\nApart from the publicity hound bit, i think of him as a guy who cut and run in your case and looked out for himself. He never hesitates to respond to me by email; but when i read about something that came up in his deposition that i thought might help you and emailed him for a copy - radio silence.\n\nI guess these days he likes to make himself relevant. Oh well, we all have our strengths and weaknesses i am sure and i have many more of the latter.\n\nnicely put. !. sounds like you suffer a similar bias. :)"}]
4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030501.txt_16603
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030501.txt
Re: Fw:
[{"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": ["Joseph Evangelist", "a", "ie"], "timestamp": "Thu Jan 28 04:56:55 2010", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Daley and frankel are saying that I need to go on TV (CNBC) to defend our hedge funds. Thoughts?"}, {"sender": "eT", "recipients": ["Jes Staley", "Joseph Evangelist", "i"], "timestamp": "Thu Jan 28 06:12:14 2010", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I wouldn't do it. Not yet and not from Davos. As you know, Davos has had some criticism in the press for bank CEOs attending and I feel like it's the wrong way to go for your first interview as IB CEO. I also think print has much more impact than TV. Talk to Lionel and Robert while you're there -- they are the two guys who can move the needle on this. And let's do more in print when you get back. In fact, Matt Zames and I spent an hour and a half with WSJ's Kate Kelly from the Journal on this issue for a major story she's doing on the Obama proposal. Let's have you quoted in that."}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "This is what my PR person said.\n\nI'm seeing Darling tomorrow morning."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jes Staley"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 11:21 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "kate kelly is a snake. im glad they said no interview,, ask peters advice he is the pr genius"}]
4
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026632.txt_16612
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026632.txt
Fwd: contacts
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/1/2016 6:45:15 PM", "subject": "Fwd: contacts", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "contacts", "body": "edelman, set martin, tata, susskind, strominger, rynolds. kosslyn, krause, gardner. bill thiel. hoffman, sinofsky,\nnathan feigenbaum, ramachandrain , demsaio, christakis, dennet, sheldrake, fewick, gellman, west kaufman,\nseligman, kurzweill ben goertzel, gould, saks mandelbrot, hopkins, mitchell kerry, clinton , richardosn, mapp ,\n\nleahy, spitzer, shcumer, pruseven waheed mandelson, ehud, lang churkin, sergey, .\n\nblaine, boris, larry summers.\n\njagland, andrew, woody\n\ndersh reummler, marty, roy, ken, jay, lilly jack, rhinehart. chet tonja, lefcourt, moscowitz. _raafat, sultan\n\nhamad jabor . karim, outarra, mohmaaed. , pastrana, cas gtro,\n\nsmell menatlal fit, , lipd crestor, dick prostatis, back prptein , diet excersicse\n\nAK chad pinto |sj, bbj, ana brice, \\\nloen terjge rothschild\nbradk"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026998.txt_16614
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026998.txt
null
[{"sender": "JONATHAN FARKASIIII", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/25/2019 10:23:28 PM", "subject": null, "body": "seeing me for lunch early July I hate you for introducing me to her can't get her out of my mind \nwhat do you think will happen between trump and xi have a great f 35 story but not for e mail and it's \nno state secret"}]
1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028934.txt_16616
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028934.txt
an article you may both hate. or like.
[{"sender": "Noam Chomsky", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "argument and evidence, while recognizing that their advocates (like most of the intellectual world in the case of secular\ndogma) are people who we should be responding to but without ridiculing them. It may be hard sometimes. For\nexample, when the icon and founding father of sober non-sentimental Realism in International Affairs informs us that\nthe US, unlike other countries, has a “transcendental purpose,” and the fact that it constantly acts in contradiction to\nits purpose doesn’t matter because the facts are just “abuse of history” while real history is “the evidence of history as\nour minds reflect it,” then it’s hard to avoid ridicule. But we should. There’s no point ridiculing virtually the entire IR\nprofession and the major journals, even though such extraordinary irrationality leads to major human disasters.\n\nOn Davis, | frankly think that’s a non-issue. If she decides she cannot do her job as the conditions of employment\nrequire (including following the law), then she can quit and look for another job. As in any other such case.\n\nNoam"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Noam Chomsky", "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, September 10, 2015 1:51 AM", "subject": "an article you may both hate. or like.", "body": "hope all is well.\n\nLawrence\n\nhttp://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/all-scientists-should-be-militant-atheists"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021749.txt_16622
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021749.txt
Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 12:30 PM", "subject": "Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald", "body": "https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article226765309.html"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Darren Indyke", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "March 14, 2019 at 12:48:11 PM EDT", "subject": "Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 14, 2019, at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "March 14, 2019 at 1:27:47 PM EDT", "subject": "Re: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/14/2019 5:28:39 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald", "body": ""}]
5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026026.txt_16623
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026026.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to Trump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747\nAnd.. .1 have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im here today flying to nw york tomow. if he is up to it ild love to sit with him , house or on plane if we wants a ride"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <JEFIII>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will ask. How long in New York? Get together?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed and fri adn yes, lye set you up to see the right hand of the Dep Cr Prince"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 5:23:42 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "cool. great."}]
7
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031192.txt_16635
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031192.txt
Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke PY", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/24/2015 5:04:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": "Only You Have Photo"}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015 at 12:02:02 PM EST", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "December 24, 2015, 11:57", "subject": "Fwd: PPB Jeffrey Epstein News Latest News Hot New Book Rips Jeffrey Epstein's $50 Billion Dollar Ponzi Scheme Text Only You Have Photo", "body": ""}]
3
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023352.txt_16640
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023352.txt
jobs ahead
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler", "Melanie Spinella", "Ada Clapp", "Richard Joslin"], "timestamp": "Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 5:18 AM", "subject": "jobs ahead", "body": "1. review accounting system. Book keeping softaware. _ staff, ( senior accountant ) methods on line banking,\nbrokerage. cash mgmt. airplane reimbursement. boat sale. art purchases sales use and sales tax. tax\n\nfilings FBAR FATCA, gaming commsion, pfics, insurance . uk co law.\n\n2. review docs for TRA BRH grats, trusts, heritage will, insurance, art lending. medical, springing\n\npowers. two fire drill books. one needed for injury. other for death\n\n3 review bills . boats , planes, legal, (PW, McFarlands all outside. legal and accounting. Toms bills over\n400k . house projects. south ny ben\n\n4 cashflow projections tax projections , interaction with Apollo accounting tax, Phaidon ,art space ,and\nRegan. legal accounting. audit\n\n5. children meetings , review to date and allocations\n\n6 review all role in payables. files scanned, no paper\n\n7 review invesmtents for tax basis and unrecognized gain\n\n8 schedule of all hedge funds . redeemables commitments etc.\n\n9 charities pledges strucutre, staff ,"}, {"sender": "Heather", "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:08 PM", "subject": "jobs ahead", "body": "Melanie Spinella\n, Ada Clapp\n\nRichard Joslin\nlets look at funding the art partnership begin with 100 m of unencumbered art. plus 20 inveestment. and the\nsame amoiunt of value from trust. leon should choose b trustee and begin to use mechanics. . later we can\namend and add .\n\n2 hire an IT person asap\n\n3.1 would hire jerry the woman. gittis. person\n\n4 I will find a subpart k person to handle partnership acct\n\n5 , accounting software upgrade, onlilne banking needs to be seamless\n\n6. not sure status of bringing plane boat acct inhouse?\n\n7 prepare fbar report for june. draft next week\n\n8 pahidon actuals vs projections. . new valuation\n\n9. new valuation of tra contract?\n\njpm db goldman sachs acct? new llc?\n\nreview of dec 31 books for all entities? bfp . etc"}, {"sender": "Heather", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 13, 2015 at 3:04 PM", "subject": "Fwd: jobs ahead", "body": "the list that we discussed... i spent time with brad again. re the candidates . fiiling due, this week, next\nmonth, ."}, {"sender": "Heather", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 18, 2015 at 2:17 PM", "subject": "agenda for tomorrrow", "body": "as areflection on your voiced spirited concerns inthe what have you done for me lately category ?\n\nyy: . inthe beginning . there was eileen and tom. ( eve and adam,-- however it appears, she declined to"}]
4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032637.txt_16643
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032637.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/6/2017 1:19:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You nailed it! (before ~1/2 of family).\n\nStill in China - from Party Congress through Trump “State+ Visit\". Many interviews/commentaries (CNN/BBC attached).\n\nMore important (from some ultimate reference frame): Radical Breakthroughs. Preproduction going well; expect to send by end of month complete preproduction document, with 3-4 pages on each of the 13 episodes - refined versions of the prototypes (first two episodes) I sent you in late Sept. Excited. Looking forward to\n\ndiscussing content.\n\nI'll be in NY from ~Nov. 21/22 through early January. When to meet? Breakthroughs and of course politics / geopolitics (so much).\n\nRobert"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020443.txt_16654
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020443.txt
Fw: The `Deplorables' Called Into Battle Again - WSJ
[{"sender": "Alexandra Preate <apreate@capitalhq.com>", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:37:29 -0400", "subject": "The `Deplorables' Called Into Battle Again - WSJ", "body": "https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-deplorables-called-into-battle-aoain-1535376353?mod=mhp\n\nThe `Deplorables' Called Into Battle Again\nAs midterms near, President Trump's former political guru Steve Bannon rallies the troops\nGerald F. SeibAug. 27, 2018 9:25 a.m. ET\nBy\nGerald F. Seib\nSteve Bannon doesn't do subtle. So it's no surprise that there's nothing subtle about the new movie President Trump's\nonetime political guru has produced to energize the Trump base for this year's midterm elections.\nIt's entitled \"Trump at War,\" and it's an hour and 15 minutes of pure Trumpian adrenaline. It opens with a series of shots\nof Trump supporters being attacked by angry opponents, shifts to outtakes of Trump supporters proudly accepting the\n\"deplorables\" label bestowed by Hillary Clinton during the 2016 presidential campaign, runs through a long series of\nangry ripostes at Trump detractors and praise of administration policy moves, and closes with dire warnings of the need to\nvote for Republicans in 2018 to head off efforts by liberals to impeach the president.\nMr. Bannon previewed the film for some Republican supporters in Dallas recently, but the big premiere is scheduled for\nSept. 9—chosen because it is the second anniversary of the speech in which Mrs. Clinton used the \"basket of deplorables\"\nphrase. The location? The very club in Manhattan where Mrs. Clinton made the speech, which has been rented for the\noccasion.\nAside from what they say about Mr. Bannon as a political provocateur, the film and its unveiling also reveal a lot about\nhow people in the president's circle increasingly see this year's midterm election: Its importance is growing every day; \nRepublican success starts with turning out core Trump supporters; and the best way to motivate them is by brandishing the\nfear of impeachment proceedings if Democrats win control of Congress.\nSteve Bannon believes the specter of impeachment will motivate mainstream Republicans as well as core Trump\nbackers. Photo: J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press\n\"This is all grass roots,\" Mr. Bannon says. \"It's 2016 all over again...This is Trump's first re-election.\"\nThe political calculus behind such thinking is pretty simple: In 19 months as president, Mr. Trump has hardened his grip\non his base of supporters and the GOP overall, but has done little to expand that base.\nMeanwhile, as the Labor Day kickoff of the fall campaign approaches, Republicans face a Democratic party whose\nactivists appear exceptionally motivated—to campaign, donate money and turn out in November.\nRepublicans need something to match that fervor. That something is the Trump base—and the best motivating tools are\nanger and fear.\nIn this case, that means specifically the fear that Special Counsel Robert Mueller, New York prosecutors and a\nDemocratic Congress will conspire to kick Mr. Trump out of office. That's why Republicans are talking about the specter\nof impeachment, not Democrats. Democrats know impeachment talk is a surefire way to motivate the other side.\nBut there's a problem in this GOP formula: A motivated Trump base is necessary for Republicans to head off disaster in\nNovember, but it's not sufficient, at least not if Democrats remain as energized as they appear today. The Trump base has\nto be married with more mainstream Republicans—the kind hardcore activists refer to as RIN0s, or \"Republicans In\nName Only\"—and with some independent voters.\nRight now, independent voters are hard to read. Their sentiments have been shifting around a lot in Wall Street\nJournal/NBC News polling in recent months. As a general rule, they have a low regard for Mr. Trump personally and\nappear weary of the atmosphere of constant crisis around him. But the polling also indicates they increasingly like how\nRepublicans are handling the economy, appreciate the GOP tax cut and think the party is changing the way things work in\nWashington.\nThat leaves moderate Republicans, of whom Mr. Bannon says simply: \"We need RINOs.\"\n=,==\nSupporters of President Trump cheer before a rally in Lewis Center, Ohio, earlier this month. Photo: Carolyn\nKaster/Associated Press\nThe Bannon calculation is that the specter of impeachment will motivate these soft Republicans as well as core Trump\nbackers. More conventional Republicans may be disdainful of Mr. Trump personally, but they also think the tax cuts,\nderegulatory policies and judicial nominations they like are imperiled if he goes down.\nSo, impeachment-scare talk, Mr. Bannon is calculating, is effective for RINOS too, simply for different reasons. For the\nTrump base, impeachment talk is a source of outrage. Soft Republicans dislike it for less emotional, more practical\nreasons.\nAll this means Republican candidates have a dual mission right now: Keep motivating those base Trump voters, who want\nfull-throated defenses of the president and odes to his hard-line immigration policies, while also luring out to the polls\nmainstream Republicans and independents who dislike the president but like lower taxes and less regulation.\nAnd if political advertising is any indication, candidates appear to be embracing both messages with nearly equal fervor.\nData compiled by CMAG Kantar Media on all political ads run so far this year show that a pro-Trump message is the\nmost common element of GOP ads. Next in line? Mentions of the tax cut Republicans pushed through Congress last year.\nWrite to Gerald F. Seib at jerry.seib@wsj.com"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2018 6:11:26 PM", "subject": "Fw: The `Deplorables' Called Into Battle Again - WSJ", "body": ""}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026754.txt_16657
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026754.txt
Barrack
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["Owen Blicksilver"], "timestamp": "8/23/2017 6:31:58 PM", "subject": "Barrack", "body": "Hi Owen -- you probably saw this, but wanted to pass on just the same. Still very \ninterested in doing a story on Tom. \nThanks. \nLandon \nhttp://www.politico.com/story/2017/08/22/trump-arizona-phoenix-rally-241923 \nAt dinners at Trump's Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club, billionaire investor Tom Barrack \nand New York real estate tycoon Richard LeFrak both talked about his potential to have \nmore support, administration officials and advisers said. Barrack, in particular, homed in \non the president's sagging poll numbers and encouraged him to govern past his political \nbase, according to one person briefed on the conversation."}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032599.txt_16659
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032599.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "your man did well. congragulations"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I will get larson to call you"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "See you I in. Ew york thurs?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 4:30 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "are we meeting in new york?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:31 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "of course"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer."}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["unknown"], "timestamp": "Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "see you then :)"}, {"sender": "unknown", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/9/2017 5:26:47 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "see you inshalla"}]
17
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026626.txt_16671
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026626.txt
US Presidential Election Update
[{"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/25/2016 9:07:53 AM", "subject": "US Presidential Election Update", "body": "Hi Jeffrey,\n\nPlease find attached report of InsightsPod generated after third US Presidential debate. Trump’s popularity has\nincreased after third debate.\n\nRegards,\nZubair"}]
1
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021642.txt_16683
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021642.txt
Re: 31E-MM-108062, 11/25/2008
[{"sender": "Ls", "recipients": ["Miami", "ALL RECEIVING OFFICES"], "timestamp": "11/25/2008", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 11/25/2008", "body": "Read and clear."}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031810.txt_16686
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031810.txt
RE:
[{"sender": "Unknown", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "RE:", "body": "Ive had enough!!!!'|_ Which puts ????"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett <paul@alphagroupcapital.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 1:40 PM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Any thoughts on the AVGO Aug puts? Stock trading at 204.50.\nAug puts now $6.50"}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeficy 5. i;", "Richard Kahn i"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 9:42 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nI understand your frustrations and appreciate your willingness to figure out a solution. I have some ideas which I will send you over the weekend if that is OK.\n\nRe Broadcom: _ the stock is up $1.20 at $211.50. After the initial shock reaction of yesterday, there has been a lot of focus on the cost synergies etc. but very little conviction in revenue opportunities. However until we hear from management as to the overall intentions of the deal, uncertainty will linger.\n\nThis morning the pricing is as follows:\n\nAug 200 Puts cost $4.10\nSept 200 Puts cost $7.90\n\nEarning are on 08/30. So worst case is the uncertainty lingers until then which would argue to buy the Sept puts. However I still prefer buying the Aug puts as I would fully expect more clarity from management before August expiry."}]
3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033267.txt_16689
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033267.txt
POTUS
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 2:02:30 PM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey\nFYI\nTrump estimate arrival Jan 12 evening\n\nPOTUS arrival — Friday, January 12, time TBD (likely PM)\nPOTUS departure — Monday, January 15, time TBD (likely PM)\n\nAdvance teams arrive tomorrow — hope to learn more specific times for these movements and will update you.\nRumors of a visit the following week are surfacing — January 19-21,"}]
1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025028.txt_16695
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025028.txt
Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 14:58:01 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "I already rad it. congragulations hope to see you soon"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:40 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Bill Siegel hopes this might be of interest to you: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jamie-glazov/the-control-factor-our-struggle-to-see-the-true-threat/"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:16:44 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "great. place.. when will you go.. did you get married? im between alber and santa fe,, zorrro ranch, you can google earth it."}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "You ok? I became friendly with shirley maclaine last year and went to her ranch in sante fe. I may go back and remembered you own half the ranch land there or something. Do you still like it there?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "Fri Feb 08 15:49:51 2013", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "shirley or your wife"}, {"sender": "Bill Siegel", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "Sill just engaged. I meant shirley"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Bill Siegel"], "timestamp": "2/8/2013 9:05:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Fro- The Control Factor - Frontpage Magazine interview", "body": "SAAAAAAAAAAAFe good boy"}]
7
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031566.txt_16703
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031566.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is it a coincidence that the russian that bought the house in palm beach and knows all , is the same guy that \nsold a painting last year to mbs for 450 million dollars. that was only worth 1. 5m?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So MBS was paying him off? Why? Ideas?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 30, 2019 at 5:35 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "reminder trump overuled congress on yemen."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 9:37:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Starting to smell sweet, the way you put it!"}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021761.txt_16708
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021761.txt
Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable
[{"sender": "Michael Reiter/PalmBeach", "recipients": ["Palm Beach Post Editorial"], "timestamp": "07/10/2008 02:36PM", "subject": "Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": "Margie, \nIT As you know, nothing too big or too small for us, especially in the summer IT Hmmmmm. I have to be \ndirect -- you or someone at your paper was very astute in checking the Clerk and Comptroller's computer \nand activity in the Epstein case two days before the hearing. As result, you sent me a text message on \nSaturday asking what the activity was about and I confirmed that the plea would take place. You were \nthe only member of the news media that I talked with. And yet, after the case is completely over, the \nPalm Beach Daily News' editorial staff remains silent on the topic. \nThanks, \nMike"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Alan M. Dershowitz", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "2/26/2010 2:59:54 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Epstein -- I apologize if you have received this but it keeps coming back to me as undeliverable", "body": ""}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031912.txt_16718
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031912.txt
null
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "7/1/2011 11:18:25 AM", "subject": null, "body": "should you point out to Ariana Huff, that the same type of person, same as strauss Kahn i s Andrews accuser, \n,long criminal record. total liar. Ariana should champion the dangers of false allegations. send a reporter or \nreporters to investigate,., the palace would love it, the girl in the photo , was nothing more than a telephone \nanswerer„ she was never 15, according to her version she worked for trump , first at that age, at MAra lago. ITs \nridiculous. but the press like strauss kahn is afraid to question women."}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033515.txt_16719
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033515.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Saturday, June 1, 2019 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/44649 1 -trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-\nemmet-flood"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 8:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why is this interesting?...Donny duetsch now has a show....should | go on and talk about \"the jeffrey |\nknow\",,.?....1 am in london when you are in paris...we should try to make progress then"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, June 3, 2019 8:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Future"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 9:12 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Huh?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "6/3/2019 1:20:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Nobt"}]
5
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031804.txt_16730
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031804.txt
AVGO
[{"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 13, 2018 9:42 AM", "subject": "RE:", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nI understand your frustrations and appreciate your willingness to figure out a solution. I have some ideas which I will send you over the weekend if that is OK.\n\nRe Broadcom: the stock is up $1.20 at $211.50. After the initial shock reaction of yesterday, there has been a lot of focus on the cost synergies etc. but very little conviction in revenue opportunities. However until we hear from management as to the overall intentions of the deal, uncertainty will linger.\n\nThis morning the pricing is as follows:\n\nAug 200 Puts cost $4.10\nSept 200 Puts cost $7.90\n\nEarning are on 08/30. So worst case is the uncertainty lingers until then which would argue to buy the Sept puts. However I still prefer buying the Aug puts as I would fully expect more clarity from management before August expiry."}, {"sender": "Paul Barrett", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Richard Kahn"], "timestamp": "7/13/2018 5:40:46 PM", "subject": "AVGO", "body": "Any thoughts on the AVGO Aug puts? Stock trading at 204.50.\nAug puts now $6.50"}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033273.txt_16735
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033273.txt
Bombshell report emerges of alleged Trump affair with Playboy model | New York Post
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/16/2018 12:56:55 PM", "subject": "Bombshell report emerges of alleged Trump affair with Playboy model | New York Post", "body": "https://nypost.com/2018/02/16/ronan-farrow-details-alleged-trump-affair-with-playboy-model-in-new-yorker-piece/"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026768.txt_16739
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026768.txt
Re: Sexual harassment and Lawrence Krauss
[{"sender": "Peter Aldhous <paldhous@buzzfeed.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 6:12 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Dr. Krauss: \n\nAs you know, I'm a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against you. As we've already discussed by email, I'd very much like to interview you about these allegations in detail.\n\n[... detailed list of incidents ...]\n\nAgain, if you wish to comment on or clarify any of these points, please get in touch with us as soon as possible."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Peter Aldhous"], "timestamp": "December 11, 2017 at 10:18:30 AM MST", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "I appreciate the opportunity to respond to your email. I am currently on a plane until noon pacific time, and then heading to a meeting right after landing, till about 2 pm or so. [... detailed response to each allegation ...] What makes this particular type of allegation so repugnant is that I get asked for literally thousands of selfies, and when people come up to me they are vulnerable, often shaking, or sometimes aggressive. I am particularly proud of the way I work to make all people feel at ease, and respected, rather than humiliated, whatever their behavior or request."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Sam Harris"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 5:47:53 PM", "subject": "Re: Sexual harassment and Lawrence Krauss", "body": "I was planning on writing both of you today or tomorrow if buzzfeed decided to go ahead with their story after I wrote to them, but since they sent this to you here is what I was planning to forward.. namely my response to their email and their original email. I hope it helps. They have clearly decided in advance to try to smear me, and potentially other atheists (I found the remarks in their 'miscellaneous facts' telling in this regard), and I felt a detailed response to the false claims was important. If you want to discuss this further I am happy to. I am currently on a plane heading to phoenix.\n\nThanks for forwarding.\n\nLMK"}]
3
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018938.txt_16742
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018938.txt
Re: 31E-MM-108062, 09/13/2006
[{"sender": "Miami", "recipients": ["Miami"], "timestamp": "09/13/2006", "subject": "Re: 31E-MM-108062, 09/13/2006", "body": "frequency of the (561) area code numbers listed on toll records. b7C\n\nPlease contact SAL___ att should any further information be needed."}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033334.txt_16745
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033334.txt
POTUS
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Jeffrey"], "timestamp": "12/14/2018 8:38:47 AM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Trump is expected to be in PBI\nDec 21st -Jan 6th\nFrom Atlantic Aviaiton:\nFor your planning purposes, please be advised that PBI is expecting a Presidential TFR from December\n21' until January 6th. As of this moment."}]
1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030362.txt_16757
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030362.txt
Re: The fool doth think he is wise
[{"sender": "John McFarlane [john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Staley, Jes: Barclays (LDN)"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 10, 2017 10:43 PM GMT Standard Time", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "As I retire for the night, I’m reminded of a poem my father was awfully fond of. It seems very apt.\n\nGood night, Jes.\n\nWorry not of tomorrow’s end\nHurry not towards falling trees\nIgnore at once, the jesters dance\nSigh, oh sigh, at the folly foiled\nTake down the mighty route of ills\nLest not make a scratch in time\nEvenhanded wins fair stance.\nBroken wooden spoons we take\nLeft, oh left, in such a state"}, {"sender": "John McFarlane <john.mcfarlane.barclays@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 21:45", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "In all seriousness, do let me know what fires/thorns you want me quelling over the next few days.\n\nIt’s important I stand fast, and alongside you.\n\nYou have carried yourself admirably today."}, {"sender": "Jes Staley", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, 10 May 2017 at 21:40", "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "I bet he doesn’t."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Re: The fool doth think he is wise", "body": "Clapton has nothing on me ha!"}]
4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032994.txt_16758
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032994.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 00:46", "subject": "Re:", "body": "are you playing a part in the xi trump. fun"}, {"sender": "Joshua Cooper Ramo", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "In Europe. You well?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joshua Cooper Ramo"], "timestamp": "4/10/2017 10:41:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Very"}]
3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030376.txt_16760
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030376.txt
null
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "10/15/2014 1:06:39 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-10-14/ruemmler-said-to-emerge-as-obama-favorite-for-justice-job.html"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032980.txt_16762
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032980.txt
Fwd: Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "2/19/2017 12:31:38 AM", "subject": "Fwd: ", "body": "Forwarded message"}, {"sender": "Roy Black", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 1:01 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "He will be by himself. Perhaps a trump administration aide to assist and accompany him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 3:30 PM -0800", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Who will represent Acosta at hearings"}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031347.txt_16772
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031347.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "1/24/2014 8:20:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Mr. Epstein,\n\nWe currently have two negatives on first page in Google but one is at 6th and the other at 7th. (Universal\nsearch, no history applied). Results will be very different if that PC has been used to click or search any of the\nresults and has not been cleared.\n\nHow did you pull the results you just sent?\n\nUsing Google Chrome + InCognito Mode + Clearing Browser Cache = only reliable reporting. I can help set\nyou up with this. Screenshot here of results using above method - http://.imgur.com/tfGN3Zj.png. This is the\ntrue representation of what your average searcher will find (statistically, most searches will be from users whom\nhave not clicked on your negative articles before)\n\nMuch progress has been made since we spoke - premium placements are getting secured over next week,\nhundreds of links have been built to your primary sites and the first movements are kicking in today (NY Mag\nmoved up to 4th a few hours ago). We still have confidence we are on the right track and doing everything we\ncan to get this cleaned up - another 45 days should be enough to have a clean first page based on what has been\ndone.\n\nPS - The foundation site was just hacked and I'm in the process of fixing that today. You can actually see it in\nthe screenshot above (it reads Cash Advance advertisement in the short-description). This is something a\nprevious company deployed but we are now going through and securing the rest of the domains to prevent basic\nhiacks like this.\n\nI'm free on my cell for next few hours. 3\n\nSincerely,\n\nTyler Shears"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "About 40,700,000 results (0.21 seconds)\n\nSearch Results\n\n1. Jeffrey Epstein - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia\nen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey Epstein\n\nWikipedia\n\nJeffrey Edward Epstein (born January 20, 1953) is an American financier and science and education\nphilanthropist. He worked at Bear Stearns early in his ...\n\nLife - Financial career - Science funding - Solicitation of prostitution\n\n2. Jeffrey Epstein: Sex Offender, Yes. Billionaire, No. - Forbes"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030491.txt_16778
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030491.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28, 2010 7:47 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "any fun?"}, {"sender": "Boris Nikolic", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:39 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Different kind of fun. \nIt is fun for a short time but i am already getting sick of so many meetings! \nMet your friend bill clinton yesterday followed up with sarkozy. Later in day meeting your other friend prince andrew as he has \nsome questions re microsoft. \nHow are you?\nboris"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Boris Nikolic"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 28 2010 10:24 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you can tell andrew we are friends"}]
3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030410.txt_16779
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030410.txt
whoopsie
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Brad S Karp"], "timestamp": "10/2/2018 11:26:53 PM", "subject": "whoopsie", "body": "https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-york-launches-tax-investigation-into-trump-after-ny-times-report-\n\n2018-10-02"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033308.txt_16790
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033308.txt
Trump Could Make the Deal of His Life and Defeat Clinton - Yahoo Finance
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/9/2016 8:14:10 AM", "subject": "Trump Could Make the Deal of His Life and Defeat Clinton - Yahoo Finance", "body": "Importance: High \nhttp://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-could-deal-life-defeat-090000096.html"}]
1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026086.txt_16792
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026086.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["<i >"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:27 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "very well many thnx and here is a refrence:\n\nKUNA : Yemeni FM: We are ready to go back to peace talks - Politics - 05/05/2017\n\nBRUSSELS, May 5 (KUNA) -- Yemeni Foreign Minister Abdulmalik Al-Makhlafi said Friday that the\nYemeni government is adhering to the peace process and is ready to go back to the table to bring peace to\nYemen as soon as possible and to save the people from more suffering.\n\n\"But the positive position of the government does not get any response by the revolutionaries who are still\nrefusing the demands for peace or to accept any international peace efforts,\" he told the Kuwait news agency,\nKUNA, in an exclusive interview at the end of his visit to Brussels.\n\nAl-Mekhlafi said they went \"to our brotherly country Kuwait\" which hosted the meeting for four months last\nyear. \"After the consultations the UN envoy presented the draft agreement and we signed it but the other side\ndid not sign it,\" he noted.\n\n\"But after we left Kuwait and till now the revolutionaries did not undertake any steps proposed by the UN\nenvoy, Ismail Ould Cheikh Ahmed. We regret that peace is on hold due the desire of the revolutionaries to\ncontinue the war,\" he said.\n\nAl Makhlafi said that the government would continue to call for peace and hopes that the international\npressures and defeats that the revolutionaries have suffered until now will make them respond to the peace\nefforts.\n\n\"We were hoping to return again to Kuwait for the talks and our Kuwaiti brothers welcomed the return of the\ntwo delegation in Kuwait in order to sign the agreement,\" he noted.\n\nThe Yemeni foreign minister expressed his deep appreciation and thanks to HH the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al-\nAhmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, to the Kuwait government and to HE the first deputy prime minister and foreign\nminister Sheikh Sabah Khaled al-Sabah who exerted great efforts during the Kuwait meetings.\n\n\"We look forward to return to Kuwait, and our brothers in Kuwait are rightly saying that we will welcome"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["qq"], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 12:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what would your emir like to see happen from the US ? concrete please. yemen will be part of a saudi\nmeeting. they said they will have someone pass by my house tom afternoon. email you after. how much\nfun"}, {"sender": "qq", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, May 14, 2017 at 11:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a good word about the Amir's effort to host the yemen peace talk will be great, i think .. and if peace agreement\n\nwas signed in kuwait that would be weed"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 15, 2017, at 3:36 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Are you going to Saudi"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/15/2017 6:45:06 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no 1 will be in dubai"}]
5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029856.txt_16794
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029856.txt
Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "5/22/2017 8:41:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "fun"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:39 PM", "subject": "Re: Fw: WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Parker, Ashley", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 22, 2017 3:19 PM", "subject": "WaPo story-- Trump's outside counsel", "body": "Hi Reid,\n\nAshley Parker here at the Washington Post. I cover the White House and am emailing because my colleague,\nBob Costa, and I getting ready to post a story about President Trump's decision to move ahead with retaining\noutside counsel, and we understand you're one of the finalists for the role, and have already spoken with senior\nWhite House officials. I just wanted to let you know that we plan to mention your name (and of course see if\nyou want to comment), and I also wanted to check and see if you were open to chatting totally off the record,\njust in case there is any nuance or guidance you'd like to provide. I'm at or my desk is\n\nThanks,\nAshley\nAshley Parker\nCell:\nDesk:\nTwitter: @AshleyRParker"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032770.txt_16796
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032770.txt
Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?
[{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/15/2018 12:33:37 AM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Yup"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 14, 2018, at 8:27 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": "Talk tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 6:43 PM", "subject": "Re: What do u make of latest trump follies?", "body": ""}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030717.txt_16803
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030717.txt
Re: hey
[{"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 19, 2018 2:15 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "How are you doing?\nA while back you mentioned that you were prediabetic. Has anything changed with that?\n\nWhat is your boy Donald up to now?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 4:32 AM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "Ask him if Putin has the photos of Trump blowing Bubba?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Mar 21, 2018, at 09:37", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "and i thought- I had tsuris"}, {"sender": "Mark L. Epstein", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/21/2018 1:54:31 PM", "subject": "Re: hey", "body": "You and your boy Donnie can make a remake of the movie Get Hard.\nSent via tin can and string."}]
4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030703.txt_16810
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030703.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "LHS TE", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "?? What number r u at?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Lisa will call.\n\nPeople are saying resignation of justice Dept number 3 is big deal."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "The list of officials frequently discussed in the texts who are no longer in their jobs seems to grow by the day. It includes former FBI Director James Comey, who was fired by Trump; former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe; Comey’s chief of staff, James Rybicki; FBI General Counsel James Baker; as well as Strzok, who was booted off the special counsel investigation and sent to a job in the FBI’s personnel div. laufman and rachel brand. not one surprise if would have heard bannon"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/10/2018 5:20:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Saw and liked Woody piece. The columnist is Good.\nDon’t follow your note. What texts"}]
4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028505.txt_16813
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028505.txt
null
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/16/2017 12:23:00 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Saw Matt C with DIT at golf tournament I know why he was there\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032764.txt_16816
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032764.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 10, 2018, at 9:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "trump will probably hire dershowitz, no joke"}, {"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/10/2018 1:20:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes agree\nseems like dershowitz has been interviewing for that job for last 2 months on fox news.."}]
2
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027048.txt_16826
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027048.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Weingarten, Reid [as@domain.com]", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2012 3:16:01 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Don't believe it"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 23, 2012 07:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "dershowiz tells me obama called him to ask him what was going on in israel. ? we should discuss."}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029117.txt_16834
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029117.txt
Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn <11.>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:50 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Hi: When are you back in NY?\nAttached is the complete Preproduction Book for Radical Breakthroughs - now including Misha Gromov!\nLove your feedback, suggestions.\nAlso attached is the budget and timing of funding, as presented originally, now updated for the completion of preproduction (phase I). We are ready to go into production (phase II). See Budget, p. 4. Committed and excited.\nWhen to meet?\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 28, 2017, at 7:40 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "great work , but needs some editing, did not like multi verse and sensience. seems more blahblah"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 1:45 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "`Blahblahs' forbidden in 'Radical Breakthroughs'. So we need two replacements (for Multiverse as Science and Rare Sentience).\nInitial ideas:\n* Expand the first episode \"Mathematics and Truth\" into two or likely three episodes. I'm intrigued by this because there is so much rich material - pure math, philosophy (discovered or invented), physics (Wigner's 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences)', astrophysics, cosmology, biology, general systems theory. I've felt frustrated in this first episode because there is so much material. I think three episodes could work - if you agree, I'll get back to you with a suggested structure of the 2 or likely 3 parts. Also, Closer To Truth has had only a few videos and one episode on mathematics per se (out of 277 episodes!), so this would be original and complementary. In this may, math would become about half the series.\n* Integrated Information Theory - quantifying and explaining consciousness (Giulio Tononi, Un of Wisconsin-Madison), plus supporters and critics. New controversial, science-based radical theory.\n* Evolutionary Dynamics - your program at Harvard - mathematical models. This is not an area of my expertise, but it could well fit Closer To Truth in general and Radical Breakthroughs in particular. But you need to tell me if you would like to include this.\n* Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and especially psychological research - the scandal in recent years. See links and attachments.\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Replication crisis\nhttps://www.nature.com/news/over-half-of-psychology-studies-fail-reproducibility-test-1.18248\nhttp://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716\n\"Replicability vs. Reproducibility\" - http://www.replicability.tau.ac.il/index.php/replicability-in-science/replicability-vs-reproducibility.html\nFive Ways to Fix Statistics - Nature [attached].\n* Other possibile areas you suggest\nWe would like to set a mutually agreed schedule so we can confirm and reserve the Closer To Truth 'season' of 13 episodes for 'Radical Breakthroughs', which we need to plan well in advance - especially as we begin 2018.\nSee you Jan. 5 - Looking forward to brainstorming.\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 6:19 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "lets talk today. I went through the candidates in math. . we should talk, I have great hopes for this and am sure you woudl want to get it right though some of the math people write well , their speakinn style and presence is less than A , and probaby closer to a C +/ . Im around today or hte weekend if you would like to chat."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 3:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Terrific; looking forward.\nExcited to go through math candidates on the list, others too.\nEqually important, discuss edits/modifications to the 13 episodes (cutting blahs), expanding math episodes - see below. Assuming we expand math episodes, we will need more mathematicians.\nHow's late afternoon after 5:30 pm / early evening today? - or weekend, day/times? (Family issues today - mother 102 in May.)\nRADICAL BREAKTHROUGHS - Initial Revisions (working model for discussion, red is new)\nExpand and Modify Mathematical Breakthrough episodes\n1. Mathematics and Truth / Overview / Show Excitement/Importance\n2. Mathematical Fields / Diverse New Kinds and Categories\n3. How Math Works in Disparate Areas of Knowledge (from fundamental physics to chemistry, biology [molecular and evolutionary[, psychology, sociology, economics, etc.)\n4. Power Laws\n5. Mathematical Biology\n6. Foundations of Mathematics / Philosophy/Meaning of Math (discovered/invented?)\nADD/Exchange to Biological Breakthrough episodes\n9/10. Replicability Crisis - Problems in Statistics in Search for Truth. Deep problems of replicability in biomedical and psychological research - the scandal in recent years.\nIn the non-Closer To Truth world....\nDid CNN Intl this morning on Trump's China-oil-N.Korea-cheating tweet \"Caught RED HANDED...\" [pun deliberate]\nMy favorite fun lines (there are so many) in Trump's NYTimes spontaneous interview.\n2) \"I like very much President Xi. He treated me better than anybody's ever been treated in the history of China.\"\nEver (-5,000 year history)\n1) \"I know the details of taxes better than anybody___better than the greatest CPA.\"\nNot, mind you, CPAs in general, not even smart Jewish CPAs who work all the time - but whoever, out of 664,532 actively licensed CPAs (2016), is the greatest CPA of them all (#1 in citing code? creative deductions?) - better than him!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Dec 29, 2017, at 3:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "it need to be about the topic and the person. some of these people are not engaging at all. I m happy to pay for more preprduction to get it right."}, {"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "12/29/2017 10:03:58 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - Breakthroughs (and Trump)", "body": "Agree! 'Get It Right' is singular priority - we think alike. This is the Role and Importance of pre-production.\nFunds adequate.\nClarity critical, as is charisma. However, given intimacy of TV interviews, it's not always apparent upfront who communicates well. Usually by not always. Sometimes someone who is a great lecturer to 500 students falls flat or off puts as arrogant. Sometimes a mousey introvert with intense eye and facial expressions sparkles and radiates. There is no substitute, however, for clarity.\nLooking forward to discussion."}]
7
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029196.txt_16835
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029196.txt
Re: October 19, Heidelberg
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Aug 29, 2018, at 11:56 AM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "What was Justin bill ? nd total to date?"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:29 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "actually I found I can buy an economy (YUK) ticket for only $1300.. so maybe I can buy that and try to upgrade it using miles.."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Aug 29, 2018, at 12:19 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "3 hrs"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "8/29/2018 11:01:49 PM", "subject": "Re: October 19, Heidelberg", "body": "Talk in 40?"}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026224.txt_16836
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026224.txt
RE: Plane management
[{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can't use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 4:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. I recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven't heard back from him. I think I talked him out of automating the divans. I agreed with what you said about that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "did anyone provide you with a biz plan that shows the proposal will generat a profit ?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "On our to-do list, but back of the envelope, we satisfied ourselves that after depreciation, we would show a profit. (In part because Apollo charter payments factor in depreciation.)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 5:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "can you share?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 9:21:33 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "It won't take long to do. We're just swamped. I'll get something to you when I can.\n\nMy biggest fear about taking this job is that there wouldn't be enough to do. You told me that concern was crazy. You were right."}]
9
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029671.txt_16840
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029671.txt
Re: After Words
[{"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:21 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "Dear Friends, \nI wanted to share with you the forward to my father's new book 'After Words'. He truly is \nan inspiration and so is his writing. The book, which is a compilation of his speeches, was \nlaunched yesterday in Sydney. I will be sure to send you a copy, it's a brilliant read. \nI trust this email finds you well. \nKindest regards \nKatherine X \nCreativity is central to our endeavours"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "On Oct 31, 2011, at 6:50 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "where are you?"}, {"sender": "Katherine Keating", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Oct 31, 2011, at 10:42 AM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "In NY. You?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Katherine Keating"], "timestamp": "10/31/2011 3:08:38 PM", "subject": "Re: After Words", "body": "Send me your phone number \nSorry for all the typos .Sent from my iPhone"}]
4
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011961.txt_16841
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011961.txt
MC2
[{"sender": "Manuela - Mega Partners", "recipients": ["Jean Luc Brunel"], "timestamp": "17/10/2014 9:36 PM (GMT+02:00)", "subject": "MC2", "body": "Dear Jean Luc,\n\nI’m very happy to hear you’re coming to the agency with Vini so we can talk about us working\nwith MC2 again.\n\nI don’t need to remind you that the sex trafficking allegations have stopped us from working with *\nyour agency for the past 5-6 years — but as Vinicius is my friend, J will try to find a girl that\nalready knows and trusts him to place with you.\n\nThank you very much for the lovely bag and we’ll see each other on fashion week.\n\nKisses,\n\nManuela"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033491.txt_16842
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033491.txt
Fwd: Photos
[{"sender": "Guy Amico", "recipients": ["Larry Visoski", "Scott Stambaugh"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 1:1", "subject": "Photos", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 7, 2014 12:45 pm", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": "Jeffrey, \nphotos of unmasked B727. Paint shop indicated we can use vinyl for your \"E\" Logo and \"Flag\" as oppose of painting, this would enable easy removal if plane sells in the future. Trump and other airlines uses vinyl for logos.\n\ncan you sketch the style of \"E\" for the tail, and I'll request rendering with slanted Flag for Right side of Vertical Stabilizer.\n\nthank you,\nLarry"}, {"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "6/7/2014 5:00:22 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Photos", "body": ""}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032957.txt_16844
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032957.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "1/12/2017 4:35:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes. im afraid you are right"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Not to disturb you, but I am struck by the similar mannerisms between Trump and McGyver"}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033059.txt_16847
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033059.txt
Re: Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trtump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 2:03 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?\n\nSent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 8:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "As usual you nailed it....tomorrow will be an interesting day"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 3:46:44 PM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "itried acoupe of times [I"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:37 AM", "subject": "Re: Re:", "body": "Call ne. as"}]
7
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033485.txt_16863
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033485.txt
NYTimes: Decade in the Red: Trump Tax Figures Show Over $1 Billion in Business Losses
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/7/2019 11:53:10 PM", "subject": "NYTimes: Decade in the Red: Trump Tax Figures Show Over $1 Billion in Business Losses", "body": "Here's a link from The New York Times that I thought you'd find interesting: \nNewly obtained tax information reveals that from 1985 to 1994, Donald J. Trump's businesses were in far \nbleaker condition than was previously known. \nSee More... \nGet The New York Times on your mobile device \nSent from my iPhone"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032943.txt_16864
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032943.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:40 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "michael can you do today at 12 instead of tomorw?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 8:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I can't. With the Trump people today."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "12/13/2016 1:48:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "btw, liked your fake news article"}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031384.txt_16871
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031384.txt
Fwd: Herald
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "NN Scott", "J. Link", "Darren Indyke", "J. Zack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "3/5/2019 11:12:41 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Herald", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Lilly Sanchez", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Herald", "body": "Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office recuses itself from Jeffrey Epstein case\n\nPlay Video\n\nDuration: 3:51\nAG nominee Barr pledges to look into handling of Epstein case\n\nSen. Ben Sasse questioned attorney general nominee William Barr about the Jeffrey Epstein case on January 15,\n2019, getting the nominee to commit to having the Department of Justice look into the handling of that case if\nconfirmed. C-SPAN Meta Viers\n\nBY JULIE K. BROWN\n\njbrown@miamiherald.com\n\nJust days before a Friday deadline, the Justice Department has reassigned the Jeffrey Epstein victims’ rights\ncase to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Atlanta, the attorneys representing Epstein’s victims’ attorneys said\n\nTuesday.\n\nMiami federal prosecutors, in letter to attorneys for the victims’s lawyers on Monday, said they had recused\n\nthemselves from the case, according to Brad Edwards and Jack Scarola, representing Epstein’s victims."}]
2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.txt_16872
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.txt
Re: deja’ vu' by pk
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["paul krassner"], "timestamp": "9/18/2018 10:40:13 PM", "subject": "Re: deja’ vu' by pk", "body": "great"}, {"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:48 PM", "subject": "Re: deja’ vu' by pk", "body": "Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit\n\nI shall identify myself only as a female aide to a Republican senator. It is also relevant that I have long\n\nnurtured a keen interest in psycho-history, the process by which a nation’s direction is interpreted as an extension\n\nof the psychological makeup of those individuals who govern it.\n\nWithout going into specific detail, let me simply state that on October 5, 1991, I happened to hear part of\na conversation among Judge—now Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and Senator\nAlan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one week after the Judiciary Committee voted, first 7-7, then\n13-1, to recommend the confirmation of Judge Thomas, and one day after the full Senate indicated that he would\n\nbe confirmed.\n\nThe conversation I happened to hear had to do with those charges brought by Anita Hill and ignored by the\nmembers of the committee, both Democratic and Republican. At that point in time I still thought this was an\nappropriate response, because the alternative would have been to hold an executive session, and Judge Thomas\nwould then have had no practical choice but to resort to heavy denial. Now, however, these men were, in a\n\njocular fashion, acknowledging the truth of what would turn out to be Professor Hill’s allegations.\n\nSenator Simpson was saying, “Y’know, Clarence, I’ve seen some pretty raunchy porno movies in my time,\n\nbut I never did see one where a lady was having sex with an animal.”\n\n“T’ll never forget it,” Judge Thomas replied in his riveting sonorous tone. “They were in a barn. Except\n\nthat the inside of the barn was like a theater.”\n\nSenator Hatch interjected, “Summer stock, eh? No pun intended”"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026218.txt_16877
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026218.txt
RE: Plane management
[{"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "Thinking of switching from Jet Aviation to EJM. EJM is more expensive. Do you have a point of view?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen", "Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "dont you want to see what the depreciation rules are. ? it depends on what you intend to do with it/ ? where do you stand with the renovations and the sale of the 5"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "GV is in inspection and going well. Not sure what renovations you mean?\n\nOn depreciation, we think we cannot use accelerated due to foreign travel preponderance, and obviously can't use bonus because not new. We think we are stuck with straight-line depreciation which will be passive.\n\nAre you saying that Jet vs. EJM could hinge on the type of plane usage? Not sure I follow that."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Barry J. Cohen"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "new depreciation rules proposed under trump"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, October 02, 2017 4:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Plane management", "body": "isnt he changing the cushions? etc and adding internet?"}, {"sender": "Barry J. Cohen", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/2/2017 8:30:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Plane management", "body": "Adding Internet and possibly changing cushions. I recommended we do it with the 4 year inspection in the spring, but haven't heard back from him. I think I talked him out of automating the divans. I agreed with what you said about that."}]
6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031002.txt_16900
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031002.txt
Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "10/9/2009 4:52:57 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeevacation <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 12:32 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Howard Rubenstein", "recipients": ["Darren"], "timestamp": "October 9, 2009 7:26:54 AM PDT", "subject": "FW: Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Hi Darren: \nI hope you are well. \nSince we are no longer working for Jeffrey, I'm forwarding this Daily News request to you so you can handle it as you see fit. \nMany thanks, \nHoward"}, {"sender": "Rush, George", "recipients": ["Howard Rubenstein"], "timestamp": "Thursday, October 08, 2009 11:08 PM", "subject": "Daily News story on Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Howard: \nWe're working on a story for our Sunday column about Jeffrey Epstein. I thought I might send my questions to you tonight, so you'd have them first thing tomorrow. \nWould you like to comment on the following:\n1. You've said that the women pressing suits against Mr. Epstein \"have lied repeatedly, and in no way shape or form were they victims. They were at his place freely and voluntarily. And one of them showed Epstein a fake ID.\" What do you have to say now that Mr. Epstein has admitted in his federal plea bargain that he did conspire to entice minors to engage in prostitution? Accepting that these women came voluntarily, isn't Mr Epstein still guilty of statutory rape?\n2. Brad Edwards, an attorney who represents three of the women, recently served a Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition on Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell. The Subpoena asks that Maxwell produce \"a list of all girls\" that visited Jeffrey Epstein's homes in Palm Beach and Manhattan, or flew on his planes. Edwards said in an interview that Maxwell was \"second-in-command of Epstein's criminal enterprise.\" He added, \"She was on Epstein's plane, transporting girls for the purpose of having sex with other people. She kept a computer database of hundreds of girls and oversaw the schedule of girls who came to Epstein's homes.\"\n3. A suit filed last May by \"Jane Doe 102\" against Epstein alleges that, after recruiting her as a 15-year-old girl to give Epstein massages, Maxwell and Epstein took part in \"sexually assaulting, battering, exploiting, and abusing Plaintiff.\"\n4. The same suit alleges that Epstein \"lured\" the girl \"every day for next two weeks\" to his house. The suit claims that she eventually became a \"sex slave\" to Epstein, traveling with him around the world. \"In all of these locations, she was required to engage in sex acts with him and other women - including other minors.\"\n5. Did Jane Doe 102 — who now lives in Australia — go on the 2002 trip where President Clinton flew on Mr. Epstein's Boeing 727?\n6. \"Most of these acts of abuse occurred during a time when defendant [Jane Doe 102] knew that the plaintiff was approximately 15, 16 and 17 years old and, after years of daily sexual exploitation continued into her adulthood ... until she fled at age 19,\"\n7. When Maxwell and Epstein celebrated Jane Doe 102's 16th birthday with her, Epstein joked that he would have to \"trade her in\" because she was getting too old for him.\n8. Not only was Jane Doe 102 required to satisfy Epstein's \"every sexual whim,\" but she also was exploited by Epstein's adult male peers. They included \"royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen and others in various locations around the world.\"\n9. The Palm Beach Post and lawyers representing Epstein's alleged victims have called his federal non-prosecution agreement a \"secret,\" \"backroom,\" \"sweetheart\" deal, noting that none of his alleged victims was consulted. Several critics have claimed Epstein \"bought\" the agreement, using politically-connected lawyers. Would he like to comment?\n10. Is Epstein cooperating with federal suit against Bear Steams hedge fund managers Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin? Willhetestifyintheircases?\n11. Mr Epstein was deposed on this week, on Thursday. Is it true that he answered almost every question by invoking his FifthAmendmentrights?\n12. Defense attorney Brad Evans has filed a motion to freeze Mr Epstein's assets. Has Mr. Epstein moved his money from the US offshore or abroad, or does he intend to, in order to protect his assets from possible damage claims?\n13. What did Mr. Epstein do during his work release program while serving time. Reports have said he engaged in \"scientific research.\" If so, what was he researching?\n14. Has Mr. Epstein returned to pursuing his investment business? Is Mr Epstein still on probation?\n15. Is Mr. Epsteinpermittedto leave FloridaortheUnited States? Do authoritiesholdhis passport?\nYou can reach me via e-mail or at or We close our column at 3 pm on Friday but can add comments as late as 3 pm on Saturday. Many thanks.\nGeorge"}]
4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030389.txt_16908
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030389.txt
Re: What is going on with your man Jes?
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon a"], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "iknow, everyone gets their turn in the barrel"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon a", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:17 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "‘Thanks for sharing the foxhole’"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon a", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:22 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "Other stuff I am sympathetic -- but to answer arandom gmail email, that is not smart!\n\nHoware you Trump contacts responding to Comey?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon a"], "timestamp": "Thursday, May 11 2017 08:30 PM", "subject": "Re: What is going on with your man Jes?", "body": "i tired to call you , not for email"}]
4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033071.txt_16911
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033071.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Monday, January 15, 2018 10:02 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "megann and memasters tried to resign"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:05 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "And...2???? Trump stopped them? He cannot stand mcgahn"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "1/15/2018 3:17:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, he refused their resignations . soi am told."}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029880.txt_16952
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029880.txt
RE: Jane Doe
[{"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Robert D. Critton Jr."], "timestamp": "8/11/2009 6:55:54 PM", "subject": "FW: Jane Doe", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:55 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Yes — we are still trying to get the details though"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Does this mean you have service on Maxwell"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Do you have service on Maxwell or still trying to subpoena her??"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:28 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Please notice the deposition of Ms. Maxwell has been rescheduled from 8/17 to 9/23. A re-Notice of Taking Deposition will follow. Mr. Trump's deposition is scheduled for August 18, 2009."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:31 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "No not likely. They just filed an emergency protective order"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 3:18 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — is the depo of going forward on Friday"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 10, 2009 12:10 PM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "I didnt forget about this... Still working on it."}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:47 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Jessica — I need a date for the deposition of Mr. Epstein. Can you provide me with one please?"}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Jacquie Johnson"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 10:20 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Great thank you. Do you have your Stays signed yet?"}, {"sender": "Jacquie Johnson", "recipients": ["Jessica Cadwell", "Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:59 AM", "subject": "RE: Jane Doe", "body": "Brad is out of the office until this afternoon — I will ask him then."}, {"sender": "Jessica Cadwell", "recipients": ["Bradley J. Edwards"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:51 AM", "subject": "Jane Doe", "body": "Brad — In your answers to ROGS, you list Milton Center for girls as facility that Jane Doe attended. Milton Center is a Department of Juvenile Justice facility; therefore I will need to get her records from DJJ. DJJ will not release the records without a signed release by Jane Doe. I have attached a general HIPPA release for your review. Would you please have Jane Doe sign it? DJJ does not have a standard form. Also, will you agree to one more week on Responses to Net Wirth ROGS?? Please let me know."}]
13