owner stringclasses 14
values | repo stringclasses 14
values | id int64 116k 4.61B | issue_number int32 1 181k | author stringlengths 1 39 | body stringlengths 1 262k | created_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:16:18 | updated_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:22:56 | reactions unknown | author_association stringclasses 5
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,140,613 | 89,418 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test android | 2026-05-27T11:33:20 | 2026-05-27T11:33:20 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,469,978 | 89,416 | kateinoigakukun | Let me put my thoughts on this: This is very unfortunate and strictly speaking the problem is not specific to wasm but any target that doesn't support putting swiftself on a register (effectively wasm only today though). Having said that, the temporal workaround is valid and worth landing as a band-aid for now. We shou... | 2026-05-27T12:26:08 | 2026-05-27T12:26:08 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,385,264 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-27T12:15:37 | 2026-05-27T12:15:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,633,593 | 88,851 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test windows platform | 2026-05-27T12:49:22 | 2026-05-27T12:49:22 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,640,033 | 89,451 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test Linux | 2026-05-27T12:50:30 | 2026-05-27T12:50:30 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,553,939,040 | 89,461 | al45tair | @swift-ci Please smoke test | 2026-05-27T11:04:23 | 2026-05-27T11:04:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,026,922 | 89,354 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test source compatibility | 2026-05-27T11:17:12 | 2026-05-27T11:17:12 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,153,501 | 89,412 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-27T11:35:19 | 2026-05-27T11:35:19 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,422,216 | 89,416 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-27T12:20:28 | 2026-05-27T12:20:28 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,675,347 | 89,450 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test Linux | 2026-05-27T12:56:40 | 2026-05-27T12:56:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,861,572 | 89,430 | tshortli | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13069
@swift-ci please smoke test Windows | 2026-05-27T13:18:30 | 2026-05-27T13:18:30 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,513,041 | 89,404 | finagolfin | Yep, [still failing](https://ci.swift.org/job/swift-PR-Linux/27939/console). | 2026-05-27T14:34:11 | 2026-05-27T14:34:11 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,181,705 | 84,927 | finagolfin | We finally removed the substitution in swiftlang/swift-docker#536 and switched to availability checking in swiftlang/swift-testing#1546, so we no longer apply any `Testing`-specific changes. | 2026-05-27T13:56:38 | 2026-05-27T13:56:38 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,882,165 | 89,451 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test macOS | 2026-05-27T13:21:04 | 2026-05-27T13:21:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,176,052 | 89,467 | grynspan | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-27T13:55:56 | 2026-05-27T13:55:56 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,280,471 | 89,403 | bkhouri | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-27T14:08:27 | 2026-05-27T14:08:27 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,019,728 | 89,444 | xedin | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-27T13:37:23 | 2026-05-27T13:37:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,374,910 | 89,404 | bkhouri | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-27T14:18:56 | 2026-05-27T14:18:56 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,944,835 | 89,445 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T13:28:32 | 2026-05-27T13:28:32 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,963,771 | 89,447 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-27T13:30:52 | 2026-05-27T13:30:52 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,309,773 | 89,404 | bkhouri | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-27T14:11:30 | 2026-05-27T14:11:30 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,326,343 | 89,404 | bkhouri | Swift Argument Parser (SAP) 1.8.1 fixes a source compatibility regression. I updated the swift toolchain to up version to SAP 1.8.1 instead of 1.8.0
https://github.com/apple/swift-argument-parser/releases/tag/1.8.1 | 2026-05-27T14:13:17 | 2026-05-27T14:13:17 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,963,346 | 89,418 | finagolfin | > the original version of the test must have passed on the watchOS simulator; it is included in the macOS validation suite, which I ran before merging https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/88914.
If you mean the watchOS arm64 simulator, sure, but none of the required pre-merge CI run the 32-bit watchOS armv7k test... | 2026-05-27T13:30:48 | 2026-05-27T13:30:48 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,816,297 | 89,461 | al45tair | @swift-ci Please smoke test | 2026-05-27T13:13:14 | 2026-05-27T13:13:14 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,878,288 | 88,904 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test windows platform | 2026-05-27T13:20:35 | 2026-05-27T13:20:35 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,806,599 | 89,418 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-27T13:11:59 | 2026-05-27T13:11:59 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,869,750 | 89,202 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test and merge | 2026-05-27T13:19:29 | 2026-05-27T13:19:29 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,873,148 | 89,449 | tshortli | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13069
@swift-ci please smoke test Windows | 2026-05-27T13:19:55 | 2026-05-27T13:19:55 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,006,783 | 89,213 | glessard | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-27T13:35:52 | 2026-05-27T13:35:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,014,152 | 89,444 | xedin | @swift-ci please test Linux platform | 2026-05-27T13:36:46 | 2026-05-27T13:36:46 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,032,330 | 89,465 | slavapestov | ```
di.swift:7:22: error: constant 'self.y' captured by a closure before being initialized
5 | init() {
6 | self.x = 0
7 | self.y = [0].map {
| `- error: constant 'self.y' captured by a closure before being initialized
8 | $0 + x
9 | }
di.swift:19:14: error: constant 's... | 2026-05-27T13:38:47 | 2026-05-27T13:38:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,453,372 | 89,404 | finagolfin | Won't this [still fail on linux CI](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89404#issuecomment-4549767990)? | 2026-05-27T14:27:27 | 2026-05-27T14:27:27 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,529,039 | 89,440 | mikeash | @swift-ci please test windows platform | 2026-05-27T14:36:01 | 2026-05-27T14:36:01 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,147,060 | 55,617 | egorzhdan | This was fixed awhile ago in https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/68397. | 2026-05-27T15:44:59 | 2026-05-27T15:44:59 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,155,369 | 89,468 | edymtt | @swift-ci please build toolchain Windows | 2026-05-27T15:45:57 | 2026-05-27T15:45:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,154,088 | 89,365 | gottesmm | @swift-ci test linux platform | 2026-05-27T15:45:48 | 2026-05-27T15:45:48 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,709,571 | 89,450 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test Linux | 2026-05-27T14:55:08 | 2026-05-27T14:55:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,312,394 | 84,168 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test windows | 2026-05-27T16:04:26 | 2026-05-27T16:04:26 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,126,000 | 89,469 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T15:42:28 | 2026-05-27T15:42:28 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,246,220 | 89,470 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-27T15:56:53 | 2026-05-27T15:56:53 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,331,222 | 89,471 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-27T16:06:47 | 2026-05-27T16:06:47 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,339,447 | 89,458 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test Windows | 2026-05-27T16:07:53 | 2026-05-27T16:07:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,823,350 | 89,442 | AnthonyLatsis | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13063
@swift-ci please test Windows | 2026-05-27T15:07:32 | 2026-05-27T15:07:32 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,053,066 | 89,432 | compnerd | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-27T15:34:01 | 2026-05-27T15:34:01 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,139,958 | 84,168 | anutosh491 | Hmmm for the Windows Platform it says "Build finished. No test results found."
Not sure if that's a failure, is it ? | 2026-05-27T15:44:07 | 2026-05-27T15:44:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,126,869 | 89,469 | compnerd | @swift-ci please build toolchain Windows ARM64 | 2026-05-27T15:42:35 | 2026-05-27T15:42:35 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,742,085 | 88,775 | tshortli | @compnerd Merging this without https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13046 or https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13069 broke PR testing for Windows | 2026-05-27T14:58:45 | 2026-05-27T14:58:45 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,790,661 | 89,449 | tshortli | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13046
@swift-ci please smoke test Windows | 2026-05-27T15:04:03 | 2026-05-27T15:04:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,925,047 | 89,229 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test windows | 2026-05-27T15:19:06 | 2026-05-27T15:19:06 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,140,229 | 88,775 | compnerd | > @compnerd Merging this without [swiftlang/llvm-project#13046](https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13046) or [swiftlang/llvm-project#13069](https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13069) broke PR testing for Windows
That showed up later - the LLDB tests have been painful and constantly regressing ... | 2026-05-27T15:44:09 | 2026-05-27T15:44:09 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,156,712 | 89,468 | edymtt | @swift-ci please test Android | 2026-05-27T15:46:06 | 2026-05-27T15:46:06 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,199,786 | 87,609 | mattmassicotte | Ohh, and I just noticed a bunch of additional debug output. I'm not sure if that is helpful or not, but I figured I'd include it here just in case:
```
Begin Error in Function: '$s4testAAyyKF'
Found outside of lifetime use?!
Value: %86 = argument of bb7 : $MockRecognizerError // users: %88, %95, %102
Consuming Us... | 2026-05-27T15:51:11 | 2026-05-27T15:51:11 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,165,216 | 89,270 | gottesmm | @swift-ci test windows platform | 2026-05-27T15:47:03 | 2026-05-27T15:47:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,249,160 | 89,436 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T15:57:15 | 2026-05-27T15:57:15 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,789,732 | 89,430 | tshortli | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13046
@swift-ci please smoke test Windows | 2026-05-27T15:03:56 | 2026-05-27T15:03:56 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,209,321 | 62,792 | grynspan | @compnerd Did you fix this? :) | 2026-05-27T15:52:24 | 2026-05-27T15:52:24 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,346,373 | 89,472 | nkcsgexi | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T16:08:49 | 2026-05-27T16:08:49 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,555,708,012 | 89,451 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test Linux | 2026-05-27T14:54:58 | 2026-05-27T14:54:58 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,157,988 | 89,270 | gottesmm | @swift-ci test windows platform
| 2026-05-27T15:46:15 | 2026-05-27T15:46:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,153,344 | 89,468 | edymtt | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T15:45:44 | 2026-05-27T15:45:44 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,200,451 | 89,171 | kavon | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-27T15:51:16 | 2026-05-27T15:51:16 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,174,655 | 87,609 | mattmassicotte | I have managed to get this down to a single, dependency-free reduction:
```swift
enum MockRecognizerError: Error, Equatable {
case unexpectedToken(Int)
case unexpectedEOF(message: String)
}
struct MockRecognizer {
func recognize(tokens: [Int]) throws(MockRecognizerError) -> [[Int]] {
[]
}
}
func test() throws ... | 2026-05-27T15:48:05 | 2026-05-27T15:48:05 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,190,774 | 89,395 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test windows platform | 2026-05-27T15:50:02 | 2026-05-27T15:50:02 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,355,456 | 89,412 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test macOS platform | 2026-05-27T16:09:59 | 2026-05-27T16:09:59 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,734,590 | 88,677 | kavon | Smaller reproducer:
```
protocol P {}
struct S: ~Escapable, ~Copyable {
@_lifetime(immortal)
init() {}
}
func g(_ s: inout S) {}
extension P {
@_lifetime(&self)
subscript() -> S {
get { S() }
_modify { var s = S(); yield &s }
}
mutating func f() {
g(&self[])
}
... | 2026-05-27T16:59:24 | 2026-05-27T16:59:24 | {
"heart": 1
} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,938,261 | 62,792 | compnerd | Yeah, https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/68397 should fix this. | 2026-05-27T17:26:06 | 2026-05-27T17:26:06 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,773,702 | 89,190 | sepy97 | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T17:04:45 | 2026-05-27T17:04:45 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,120,461 | 88,765 | keith | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-27T17:48:52 | 2026-05-27T17:48:52 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,642,437 | 88,765 | keith | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-27T18:50:16 | 2026-05-27T18:50:16 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,424,709 | 89,445 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T16:18:47 | 2026-05-27T16:18:47 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,902,591 | 89,261 | plemarquand | Please test with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-package-manager/pull/10135
@swift-ci please test Linux Platform | 2026-05-27T17:21:46 | 2026-05-27T17:21:46 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,547,176 | 89,412 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-27T18:39:30 | 2026-05-27T18:39:30 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,715,722 | 89,477 | compnerd | CC: @al45tair @carlos4242 @charles-zablit | 2026-05-27T18:57:32 | 2026-05-27T18:57:32 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,716,581 | 89,477 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T18:57:36 | 2026-05-27T18:57:36 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,436,273 | 89,447 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-27T16:20:17 | 2026-05-27T16:20:17 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,600,643 | 89,412 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test windows platform | 2026-05-27T16:41:36 | 2026-05-27T16:41:36 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,473,042 | 89,307 | qiongsiwu | Gentle ping for reviews. | 2026-05-27T16:25:09 | 2026-05-27T16:25:09 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,576,436 | 75,321 | jmschonfeld | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/527
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-foundation/pull/1999
@swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T16:38:20 | 2026-05-27T16:38:20 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,596,690 | 89,354 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test windows platform | 2026-05-27T16:41:02 | 2026-05-27T16:41:02 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,091,475 | 89,434 | mikeash | @swift-ci please test windows platform | 2026-05-27T17:44:46 | 2026-05-27T17:44:46 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,275,123 | 89,433 | AnthonyLatsis | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13062
@swift-ci please test Windows | 2026-05-27T18:07:49 | 2026-05-27T18:07:49 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,477,867 | 89,455 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T16:25:47 | 2026-05-27T16:25:47 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,577,942 | 75,321 | jmschonfeld | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/527
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-foundation/pull/1999
@swift-ci please build toolchain | 2026-05-27T16:38:32 | 2026-05-27T16:38:32 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,168,505 | 89,313 | j-hui | ```TEST 'lldb-api :: lang/swift/metadata_cache/TestSwiftMetadataCache.py' FAILED```
Seems quite unrelated | 2026-05-27T17:55:32 | 2026-05-27T17:55:32 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,517,315 | 89,430 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T18:36:04 | 2026-05-27T18:36:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,999,598 | 89,400 | kavon | I think this needs to be fixed in two places, neither of which are in IRGen.
In Sema / the constraint solver, the metatype should not be inferred as `any ~Copyable & ~Escapable` as there are no inverses on the original `T` in the callee's signature. When someone does have inverses on `T`, then we need a deployment ... | 2026-05-27T17:33:54 | 2026-05-27T17:33:54 | {
"+1": 1,
"heart": 1
} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,214,165 | 88,867 | compnerd | > Seems reasonable to me. I did wonder whether maybe we wanted a different directory rather than `bin`, but then the installer script can pick them up and put them wherever so that probably isn't a big deal anyway.
`bin` is the traditional location for the PDB to be installed to. | 2026-05-27T18:00:21 | 2026-05-27T18:00:21 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,450,379 | 89,473 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T16:22:09 | 2026-05-27T16:22:09 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,454,591 | 82,155 | airspeedswift | This is fixed on main, likely from work on OSSA. Added a regression test [here](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89473) | 2026-05-27T16:22:42 | 2026-05-27T16:22:42 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,502,863 | 89,307 | cachemeifyoucan | > > if you have two driver invocations to the build system
>
> Could you help me understand how we can have two driver invocations to the build system that conflict with each other? I thought the driver invocations are independent of each other.
The ScanningService is shared and used by all swift-driver invocatio... | 2026-05-27T16:28:54 | 2026-05-27T16:28:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,860,524 | 89,450 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-27T17:16:24 | 2026-05-27T17:16:24 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,269,503 | 88,763 | tshortli | I think maybe I understand the motivation better from looking at https://github.com/cgrindel/rules_swift_package_manager/issues/892. A package does not necessarily decide which deployment target it builds with and it may need to remain source compatible with a range of deployment targets, potentially using APIs on lowe... | 2026-05-27T18:07:07 | 2026-05-27T18:07:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,624,160 | 89,446 | augusto2112 | @swift-ci smoke test Windows | 2026-05-27T16:44:56 | 2026-05-27T16:44:56 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,868,594 | 89,451 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-27T17:17:34 | 2026-05-27T17:17:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,974,088 | 89,402 | kavon | We shouldn't be inferring the existential metatype to be `(any ~Copyable & ~Escapable).Type` at all, as `T` is a plain generic parameter without any inverses. It should be inferred as `(any Copyable & Escapable).Type` | 2026-05-27T17:30:32 | 2026-05-27T17:30:32 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,988,860 | 89,474 | jmschonfeld | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T17:32:28 | 2026-05-27T17:32:28 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,140,290 | 89,448 | akyrtzi | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-27T17:51:38 | 2026-05-27T17:51:38 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,234,315 | 88,763 | tshortli | Can you motivate this a bit more? Once a project/package decides to adopt a higher deployment target, I would expect part of that process to be cleaning up calls to obsolete APIs, especially in code that is now unreachable. Why is a carveout for the now unreachable code desirable? | 2026-05-27T18:02:27 | 2026-05-27T18:02:27 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,529,987 | 88,908 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T16:32:12 | 2026-05-27T16:32:12 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,556,623,113 | 89,443 | augusto2112 | @swift-ci test Windows | 2026-05-27T16:44:48 | 2026-05-27T16:44:48 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.