owner stringclasses 14
values | repo stringclasses 14
values | id int64 116k 4.61B | issue_number int32 1 181k | author stringlengths 1 39 | body stringlengths 1 262k | created_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:16:18 | updated_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:22:56 | reactions unknown | author_association stringclasses 5
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,724,785 | 89,358 | al45tair | @swift-ci please test macOS platform | 2026-05-26T11:05:27 | 2026-05-26T11:05:27 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,189,634 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci benchmark | 2026-05-26T14:43:37 | 2026-05-26T14:43:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,328,564 | 89,302 | 3405691582 | @swift-ci please test. | 2026-05-26T14:57:29 | 2026-05-26T14:57:29 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,341,251 | 89,436 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T18:23:42 | 2026-05-26T18:23:42 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,704,868 | 89,354 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test windows platform | 2026-05-26T11:00:46 | 2026-05-26T11:00:46 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,776,860 | 89,114 | finagolfin | This pull appears to have broken both [the Amazon Linux AArch64 CI](https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-package-amazon-linux-2023-aarch64/62/console), because @kavon disabled a few tests there alone in #85297, and clang now complains that that code isn't run:
```
22:20:05 FAILED: unittests/runtime/CMakeFiles/SwiftRun... | 2026-05-26T11:19:27 | 2026-05-26T11:19:27 | {
"eyes": 1
} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,802,410 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T11:26:26 | 2026-05-26T11:26:26 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,686,429 | 88,920 | eeckstein | @swift-ci apple silicon benchmark | 2026-05-26T13:52:08 | 2026-05-26T13:52:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,634,963 | 88,775 | compnerd | Please test with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/524
@swift-ci please build toolchain Windows platform | 2026-05-26T15:28:38 | 2026-05-26T15:28:38 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,449,062 | 89,425 | cachemeifyoucan | @swift-ci please test macOS platform | 2026-05-26T18:36:26 | 2026-05-26T18:36:26 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,548,502,848 | 88,984 | xedin | I haven't actually looked at the failure, what was the problem there?
I think `lazy` should behave like:
```
nonisolated struct Test {
var x: Int {
_x
}
var _x: Int = 0
}
```
And based on the test-cases that's exactly how it looks like in the interface so I'm not sure what the prob... | 2026-05-26T20:25:08 | 2026-05-26T20:25:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,548,740,411 | 89,443 | augusto2112 | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-26T20:51:37 | 2026-05-26T20:51:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,641,108 | 89,368 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-26T10:52:50 | 2026-05-26T10:52:50 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,649,645 | 89,339 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T13:48:13 | 2026-05-26T13:48:13 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,782,444 | 88,547 | tbkka | @swift-ci Please test Windows | 2026-05-26T14:01:45 | 2026-05-26T14:01:45 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,544,968,358 | 84,195 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-26T14:20:23 | 2026-05-26T14:20:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,546,450,467 | 89,005 | Snowy1803 | Moved to be part of #89412 | 2026-05-26T16:51:42 | 2026-05-26T16:51:42 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,546,540,000 | 89,428 | glessard | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T16:59:32 | 2026-05-26T16:59:32 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,144,178 | 89,403 | bkhouri | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T17:57:11 | 2026-05-26T17:57:11 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,334,121 | 89,389 | kavon | What is the issue being reported here? The release/6.3 branch does not include a complete implementation of `SuppressedAssociatedTypesWithDefaults`. It's not expected to be working until release/6.4.x and what is the justification to backport this feature to an older compiler? | 2026-05-26T18:22:43 | 2026-05-26T18:23:18 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,543,988,231 | 89,414 | eeckstein | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-26T12:14:33 | 2026-05-26T12:14:33 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,108,693 | 88,668 | cachemeifyoucan | @artemcm any opinions on this? | 2026-05-26T17:52:10 | 2026-05-26T17:52:10 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,545,273,563 | 89,362 | edymtt | @swift-ci please build toolchain Windows | 2026-05-26T14:52:31 | 2026-05-26T14:52:31 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,547,215,205 | 89,434 | mikeash | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T18:06:38 | 2026-05-26T18:06:38 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,548,818,356 | 89,213 | glessard | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T21:02:43 | 2026-05-26T21:02:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,548,977,548 | 89,445 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T21:17:45 | 2026-05-26T21:17:45 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,219,879 | 89,213 | glessard | Rebased again to resolve _another_ merge conflict. | 2026-05-26T21:43:54 | 2026-05-26T21:43:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,542,785 | 89,447 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T22:25:39 | 2026-05-26T22:25:39 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,832,561 | 89,432 | compnerd | Please test with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13046
@swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-26T23:18:40 | 2026-05-26T23:18:40 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,220,781 | 89,213 | glessard | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T21:43:59 | 2026-05-26T21:43:59 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,412,140 | 89,244 | bruxisma | Hi, I can't provide a code example because this is all within the API Notes side of things.
Using the SDL3 library as an example (this is where I've been trying to test the limits of API Notes), there's multiple C macro defines that hold a value. e.g., [`SDL_PROP_RENDERER_NAME_STRING`](https://github.com/libsdl-org/SD... | 2026-05-26T22:04:32 | 2026-05-26T22:04:32 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,550,157,234 | 89,395 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test windows platform | 2026-05-27T00:22:31 | 2026-05-27T00:22:31 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,290,496 | 89,364 | edymtt | @compnerd thanks for your observation -- after talking offline with Evan, this does not make much sense in opensource. | 2026-05-26T21:53:34 | 2026-05-26T21:53:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,550,033,862 | 89,450 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T23:59:49 | 2026-05-26T23:59:49 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,550,769,620 | 89,450 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-27T02:41:50 | 2026-05-27T02:41:50 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,872,791 | 89,418 | finagolfin | Did this work on watchOS armv7k? I saw this test producing different IR for Android armv7 locally too. | 2026-05-26T23:27:10 | 2026-05-26T23:27:10 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,550,141,044 | 89,244 | hnrklssn | I see, it was not clear to me that this was regarding API notes: I thought you were trying to attach a clang attribute to a C macro, which will not work for self explanatory reasons. So there are two separate items here: macros cannot be annotated with API notes, and API notes don't have great diagnostics when things g... | 2026-05-27T00:19:25 | 2026-05-27T00:19:25 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,270,055 | 89,270 | gottesmm | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T21:50:07 | 2026-05-26T21:50:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,523,147 | 89,365 | gottesmm | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-26T22:21:58 | 2026-05-26T22:21:58 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,736,006 | 89,448 | akyrtzi | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T23:01:43 | 2026-05-26T23:01:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,158,026 | 89,229 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T21:34:47 | 2026-05-26T21:34:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,405,896 | 89,444 | xedin | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T22:03:51 | 2026-05-26T22:03:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,550,146,089 | 89,202 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test windows platform | 2026-05-27T00:20:02 | 2026-05-27T00:20:02 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,551,216,059 | 89,408 | patrykstefanski | @swift-ci please test windows platform | 2026-05-27T04:19:36 | 2026-05-27T04:19:36 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,548,997,261 | 89,438 | nkcsgexi | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-26T21:19:27 | 2026-05-26T21:19:27 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,054,088 | 89,313 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T21:24:50 | 2026-05-26T21:24:50 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,215,023 | 89,429 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please test Windows | 2026-05-26T21:43:06 | 2026-05-26T21:43:06 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,509,814 | 89,420 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-26T22:19:28 | 2026-05-26T22:19:28 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,550,761,541 | 89,449 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T02:39:45 | 2026-05-27T02:39:45 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,275,810 | 89,362 | edymtt | Good catch, those are part of the underlying SDK and were removed from the public repository with https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/37600 | 2026-05-26T21:51:04 | 2026-05-26T21:51:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,855,134 | 87,867 | finagolfin | Android CI run checking Docker pull unrelated to this Windows pull
swiftlang/swift-docker#537
@swift-ci test android | 2026-05-26T23:23:24 | 2026-05-26T23:23:24 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,551,183,954 | 89,455 | hnrklssn | This PR is based on top of https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89395. Only the last commit belongs to this PR. | 2026-05-27T04:13:21 | 2026-05-27T04:13:21 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,568,835 | 75,321 | jmschonfeld | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/527
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-foundation/pull/1999
@swift-ci please build toolchain | 2026-05-26T22:30:05 | 2026-05-26T22:30:05 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,900,267 | 89,430 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T23:32:23 | 2026-05-26T23:32:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,550,888,625 | 89,451 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test Linux | 2026-05-27T03:11:42 | 2026-05-27T03:11:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,551,037,158 | 89,411 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T03:46:30 | 2026-05-27T03:46:30 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,548,107 | 88,465 | ktoso | Depends on https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89416 | 2026-05-26T22:26:33 | 2026-05-26T22:26:33 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,767,990 | 89,404 | finagolfin | The linux CI builds an early swift driver with this Argument Parser update using a prebuilt Swift 5.9.2, which doesn't recognize new Swift features like typed throws and internal imports in 1.8.0.
We'll need to either modify SAP 1.8.1 to keep working with Swift 5.9 or update the host compiler used to bootstrap the t... | 2026-05-26T23:06:39 | 2026-05-26T23:06:39 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,551,147,260 | 89,395 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T04:07:51 | 2026-05-27T04:07:51 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,101,381 | 89,408 | patrykstefanski | @swift-ci please test windows platform | 2026-05-26T21:28:49 | 2026-05-26T21:28:49 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,568,034 | 75,321 | jmschonfeld | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/527
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-foundation/pull/1999
@swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T22:29:57 | 2026-05-26T22:29:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,999,432 | 89,449 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-26T23:52:49 | 2026-05-26T23:52:49 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,550,159,342 | 89,244 | bruxisma | Apologies, I totally forgot to mention API Notes in my initial filing. Woops.
This is for the use case of applying notations to someone else's code base. [This was discussed to some degree in this post from the swift blog](https://www.swift.org/blog/improving-usability-of-c-libraries-in-swift/). As I don't want to ope... | 2026-05-27T00:22:57 | 2026-05-27T00:22:57 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,548,981,810 | 89,446 | augusto2112 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-26T21:18:04 | 2026-05-26T21:18:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,549,119,297 | 89,428 | glessard | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-26T21:30:18 | 2026-05-26T21:30:18 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,550,151,116 | 89,451 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-27T00:21:05 | 2026-05-27T00:21:05 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,550,151,192 | 88,851 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T00:21:06 | 2026-05-27T00:21:06 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,551,180,038 | 89,455 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T04:12:42 | 2026-05-27T04:12:42 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,551,233,222 | 84,168 | anutosh491 | Resolved simple conflict after https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/84195 went it. | 2026-05-27T04:22:43 | 2026-05-27T04:22:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,551,255,717 | 84,168 | anutosh491 | Guessing the test bot needs to be invoked after each commit ? Doing it below. | 2026-05-27T04:25:18 | 2026-05-27T04:25:18 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,551,403,977 | 89,449 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T04:50:47 | 2026-05-27T04:50:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,551,256,873 | 84,168 | anutosh491 | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-27T04:25:24 | 2026-05-27T04:25:24 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,551,409,102 | 89,450 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-27T04:51:52 | 2026-05-27T04:51:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,552,008,408 | 89,313 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test windows platform | 2026-05-27T06:35:49 | 2026-05-27T06:35:49 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,551,838,668 | 89,411 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T06:05:37 | 2026-05-27T06:05:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,552,044,567 | 89,432 | compnerd | Please test with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13069
@swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-27T06:40:14 | 2026-05-27T06:40:14 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,552,905,234 | 89,404 | finagolfin | Heh, [the Docc tests also have async invocations](https://ci.swift.org/job/swift-PR-macos-arm64/2119/console) that must be updated. | 2026-05-27T08:41:19 | 2026-05-27T08:41:19 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,553,251,052 | 89,400 | xjchuan | Hi @Azoy, thanks for the explanation — want to make sure I understand your point correctly, so I verified both reproducers on **Xcode 26.3** (`swiftlang-6.2.4.1.4`), target `arm64-apple-ios15.0-simulator`, just looking at the emitted IR:
**Your example** — `let x: Any = (any ~Copyable).self`:
```llvm
call ptr @swi... | 2026-05-27T09:26:14 | 2026-05-27T10:17:45 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,552,957,553 | 84,168 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-27T08:48:25 | 2026-05-27T08:48:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,552,982,254 | 89,420 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test macos | 2026-05-27T08:52:00 | 2026-05-27T08:52:00 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,553,030,716 | 89,409 | finagolfin | Just a head's up that [the new UBI 10 AArch64 CI flaked twice in a row for one of the linux backtracing tests](https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-package-ubi-10-aarch64/59/), something you may need to look at if it keeps breaking. I assume it's a flake because I see no changes in this repo that would cause it. | 2026-05-27T08:58:42 | 2026-05-27T08:58:42 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,552,537,888 | 89,409 | al45tair | On reflection I think this isn't the right fix; @weissi is right that being able to remotely `SIGILL` something is potentially a useful debugging trick and I don't think we want to break that. | 2026-05-27T07:47:59 | 2026-05-27T07:47:59 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,552,885,347 | 89,411 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T08:38:41 | 2026-05-27T08:38:41 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,552,982,908 | 89,420 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test windows | 2026-05-27T08:52:06 | 2026-05-27T08:52:06 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,553,497,718 | 89,409 | al45tair | > Just a head's up that [the new UBI 10 AArch64 CI flaked twice in a row for one of the linux backtracing tests](https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-package-ubi-10-aarch64/59/), something you may need to look at if it keeps breaking. I assume it's a flake because I see no changes in this repo that would cause it.
Loo... | 2026-05-27T10:00:15 | 2026-05-27T10:00:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,553,409,892 | 89,427 | carlpeto | @swift-ci please smoke test windows platform | 2026-05-27T09:48:07 | 2026-05-27T09:48:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,552,979,633 | 89,229 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-27T08:51:37 | 2026-05-27T08:51:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,553,647,273 | 89,458 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-27T10:21:40 | 2026-05-27T10:21:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,553,678,593 | 89,459 | ahoppen | sourcekitd is crashing with
```
Thread 7 Crashed:
0 libsystem_kernel.dylib 0x1841ad5b0 __pthread_kill + 8
1 libsystem_pthread.dylib 0x1841e7888 pthread_kill + 296
2 libsystem_c.dylib 0x1840ec8e0 __abort + 132
3 libsystem_c.dylib 0x1840ec85c a... | 2026-05-27T10:26:06 | 2026-05-27T10:26:06 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,553,705,413 | 89,460 | ahoppen | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13061
@swift-ci Please smoke test | 2026-05-27T10:30:08 | 2026-05-27T10:30:08 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,140,091 | 89,418 | aidan-hall | > Did this work on watchOS armv7k? I saw this test producing different IR for Android armv7 locally too.
I don't have a setup for running 32-bit target tests locally, but the *original* version of the test must have passed on the watchOS simulator; it is included in the macOS validation suite, which I ran before mer... | 2026-05-27T11:33:15 | 2026-05-27T11:33:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,553,957,463 | 89,283 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T11:07:08 | 2026-05-27T11:07:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,022,421 | 89,354 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-27T11:16:38 | 2026-05-27T11:16:38 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,652,744 | 89,449 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test Windows
| 2026-05-27T12:52:47 | 2026-05-27T12:52:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,223,098 | 89,462 | elsakeirouz | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T11:47:49 | 2026-05-27T11:47:49 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,636,967 | 89,430 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test Windows | 2026-05-27T12:49:57 | 2026-05-27T12:49:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,628,446 | 88,904 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test windows platform | 2026-05-27T12:48:29 | 2026-05-27T12:48:29 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,484,245 | 89,464 | artemcm | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-27T12:27:44 | 2026-05-27T12:27:44 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,386,937 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-27T12:15:54 | 2026-05-27T12:15:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,554,141,302 | 89,418 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test WebAssembly | 2026-05-27T11:33:26 | 2026-05-27T11:33:26 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.