owner stringclasses 14
values | repo stringclasses 14
values | id int64 116k 4.61B | issue_number int32 1 181k | author stringlengths 1 39 | body stringlengths 1 262k | created_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:16:18 | updated_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:22:56 | reactions unknown | author_association stringclasses 5
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,169,387 | 89,313 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test windows platform | 2026-05-27T17:55:39 | 2026-05-27T17:55:39 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,301,666 | 88,763 | keith | Yea exactly, this is more useful for the 3rd party case, especially if you build code for multiple deployment targets | 2026-05-27T18:11:15 | 2026-05-27T18:11:15 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,338,603 | 89,476 | jckarter | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-27T18:15:42 | 2026-05-27T18:15:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,718,417 | 89,477 | compnerd | @swift-ci please build toolchain Windows platform | 2026-05-27T18:57:48 | 2026-05-27T18:57:48 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,557,994,527 | 89,478 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T19:31:12 | 2026-05-27T19:31:12 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,033,589 | 87,521 | Azoy | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T19:36:30 | 2026-05-27T19:36:30 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,150,355 | 89,178 | tbkka | Could you try it against a recent snapshot from the `main` branch? I wasn't able to reproduce it here. | 2026-05-27T19:53:54 | 2026-05-27T19:53:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,027,334 | 89,438 | nkcsgexi | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-27T19:35:31 | 2026-05-27T19:35:31 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,011,203 | 89,479 | AnthonyLatsis | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13073
@swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T19:33:16 | 2026-05-27T19:33:16 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,042,471 | 89,478 | airspeedswift | I was trying to fix diagnostics like [this](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/blob/main/test/Interop/Cxx/operators/subscript-overloads-typechecker.swift#L53) and the tests for the fix were failing because the results varied run to run. That would mean if there were multiple diagnostics, the order would change (includi... | 2026-05-27T19:37:52 | 2026-05-27T19:41:46 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,152,776 | 89,481 | j-hui | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-27T19:54:15 | 2026-05-27T19:54:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,218,939 | 89,307 | qiongsiwu | @swift-ci please test Windows | 2026-05-27T20:03:09 | 2026-05-27T20:03:09 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,796,614 | 89,213 | natecook1000 | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-27T21:25:18 | 2026-05-27T21:25:18 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,909,696 | 89,369 | kavon | Thanks! Are the issues you're seeing the same kinds seen for other swift-reflection-dump tests? | 2026-05-27T21:44:07 | 2026-05-27T21:44:07 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,973,395 | 89,430 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test Linux | 2026-05-27T21:55:17 | 2026-05-27T21:55:17 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,153,841 | 89,484 | slavapestov | @swift-ci Please smoke test | 2026-05-27T22:25:57 | 2026-05-27T22:25:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,235,005 | 65,101 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test macos | 2026-05-27T22:42:04 | 2026-05-27T22:42:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,788,713 | 89,213 | natecook1000 | @swift-ci Please build toolchain macOS platform | 2026-05-27T21:24:09 | 2026-05-27T21:24:09 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,353,771 | 89,436 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test linux platform | 2026-05-27T22:58:50 | 2026-05-27T22:58:50 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,227,109 | 89,420 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test windows | 2026-05-27T22:40:40 | 2026-05-27T22:40:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,227,898 | 89,420 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci smoke test macos | 2026-05-27T22:40:50 | 2026-05-27T22:40:50 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,749,835 | 89,468 | edymtt | @swift-ci please smoke test Windows | 2026-05-27T21:18:04 | 2026-05-27T21:18:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,335,178 | 88,765 | keith | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-27T22:56:20 | 2026-05-27T22:56:20 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,800,303 | 89,441 | meg-gupta | @swift-ci test linux platform | 2026-05-27T21:25:53 | 2026-05-27T21:25:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,225,000 | 89,416 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test windows | 2026-05-27T22:40:15 | 2026-05-27T22:40:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,794,662 | 89,213 | natecook1000 | Not sure what this means (from the Windows CI failure):
```
Unresolved Tests (1):
lldb-api :: lang/swift/metadata_cache/TestSwiftMetadataCache.py
``` | 2026-05-27T21:25:01 | 2026-05-27T21:25:14 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,222,326 | 89,229 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test windows | 2026-05-27T22:39:47 | 2026-05-27T22:39:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,238,629 | 89,459 | lamersc | Do you believe this issue is fixable by a first time contributor to the Swift project? If so, I would like to take a shot at it. | 2026-05-27T22:42:36 | 2026-05-27T22:42:36 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,640,387 | 89,432 | compnerd | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-27T21:02:08 | 2026-05-27T21:02:08 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,558,802,825 | 89,436 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test linux platform | 2026-05-27T21:26:17 | 2026-05-27T21:26:17 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,377,802 | 89,479 | AnthonyLatsis | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13073
@swift-ci please smoke test Linux | 2026-05-27T23:02:14 | 2026-05-27T23:02:14 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,803,491 | 89,488 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T00:30:11 | 2026-05-28T00:30:11 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,156,546 | 89,283 | ktoso | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13074
@swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T01:49:48 | 2026-05-28T01:49:48 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,486,267 | 89,442 | AnthonyLatsis | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13063
@swift-ci please test Windows | 2026-05-27T23:21:08 | 2026-05-27T23:21:08 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,481,630 | 89,487 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-27T23:20:03 | 2026-05-27T23:20:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,495,555 | 89,445 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please smoke test Windows | 2026-05-27T23:23:28 | 2026-05-27T23:23:28 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,497,829 | 89,447 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please test macOS | 2026-05-27T23:24:02 | 2026-05-27T23:24:02 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,527,310 | 89,438 | nkcsgexi | @swift-ci please test Linux Platform | 2026-05-27T23:30:25 | 2026-05-27T23:30:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,125,314 | 89,469 | compnerd | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-28T01:42:08 | 2026-05-28T01:42:08 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,942,326 | 88,583 | compnerd | Please build with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/521
@swift-ci please build toolchain Windows platform | 2026-05-28T00:58:37 | 2026-05-28T00:58:37 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,883,087 | 89,490 | kavon | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-28T00:46:20 | 2026-05-28T00:46:20 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,127,258 | 89,477 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test Linux platform | 2026-05-28T01:42:36 | 2026-05-28T01:42:36 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,143,613 | 89,477 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T01:46:33 | 2026-05-28T01:46:33 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,559,579,717 | 89,408 | patrykstefanski | @swift-ci please test windows platform | 2026-05-27T23:40:29 | 2026-05-27T23:40:29 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,001,460 | 89,489 | kavon | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-28T01:12:24 | 2026-05-28T01:12:24 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,294,974 | 86,081 | krishnamurthyb | > This would have to go through the evolution process, because the Sendable proposal explicitly states that only final classes can be "safely" Sendable: https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-evolution/blob/main/proposals/0302-concurrent-value-and-concurrent-closures.md#sendable-conformance-checking-for-classes
>
> One re... | 2026-05-28T02:21:28 | 2026-05-28T02:21:28 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,991,746 | 89,496 | xwu | cc @tbkka @stephentyrone | 2026-05-28T05:07:34 | 2026-05-28T05:07:34 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,991,387 | 89,487 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T05:07:30 | 2026-05-28T05:07:30 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,518,686 | 89,484 | slavapestov | @swift-ci Please smoke test | 2026-05-28T03:09:17 | 2026-05-28T03:09:17 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,561,002,180 | 89,487 | j-hui | @swift-ci Please smoke test | 2026-05-28T05:09:56 | 2026-05-28T05:09:56 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,522,342 | 89,493 | slavapestov | @swift-ci Please smoke test | 2026-05-28T03:10:02 | 2026-05-28T03:10:02 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,514,017 | 89,168 | slavapestov | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-28T03:08:16 | 2026-05-28T03:08:16 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,926,049 | 89,133 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T04:52:26 | 2026-05-28T04:52:26 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,983,676 | 89,477 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T05:06:05 | 2026-05-28T05:06:05 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,588,170 | 89,369 | finagolfin | > Are the issues you're seeing the same kinds seen for other swift-reflection-dump tests?
Unsure what those are, was just noting that this test is already disabled for `arm64e`.
For Android, there is an issue with the lld that comes with the NDK 28 we currently use on the Android CI, that doesn't work well with t... | 2026-05-28T03:23:25 | 2026-05-28T03:23:25 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,814,862 | 89,395 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T04:23:50 | 2026-05-28T04:23:50 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,762,600 | 89,494 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T04:09:13 | 2026-05-28T04:09:13 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,903,881 | 89,479 | AnthonyLatsis | https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13073
@swift-ci please smoke test Windows | 2026-05-28T04:46:59 | 2026-05-28T04:46:59 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,561,061,367 | 89,497 | AnthonyLatsis | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T05:23:55 | 2026-05-28T05:23:55 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,562,875 | 89,430 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T03:18:51 | 2026-05-28T03:18:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,560,913,721 | 89,495 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T04:49:26 | 2026-05-28T04:49:26 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,561,083,663 | 89,438 | nkcsgexi | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T05:28:58 | 2026-05-28T05:28:58 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,561,672,349 | 88,465 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T07:22:39 | 2026-05-28T07:22:39 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,561,191,177 | 89,444 | xedin | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T05:52:52 | 2026-05-28T05:52:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,561,209,613 | 89,444 | xedin | @swift-ci please test source compatibility | 2026-05-28T05:56:45 | 2026-05-28T05:56:45 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,561,541,164 | 89,411 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T07:01:23 | 2026-05-28T07:01:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,561,953,112 | 85,017 | mustiikhalil | @xedin so would that mean this ticket should be closed? | 2026-05-28T08:05:08 | 2026-05-28T08:05:08 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,562,497,353 | 89,236 | al45tair | Fix is here: https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89357 | 2026-05-28T09:17:23 | 2026-05-28T09:17:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,562,613,592 | 89,461 | al45tair | @swift-ci Please smoke test | 2026-05-28T09:31:25 | 2026-05-28T09:31:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,562,746,521 | 89,354 | Snowy1803 | Source compatibility test suite failures are the same as on main. | 2026-05-28T09:46:50 | 2026-05-28T09:46:50 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,524,878,679 | 74,303 | coenttb | Sibling instance of the `__swift_instantiateConcreteTypeFromMangledName` null-return family, in a different domain — institute Tagged + Atomic + `~Copyable`.
**Shape.** `Atomic<Tagged<Tag, Ordinal>>.advance(within: Tagged<Tag, Cardinal>)`, where `Tagged<Tag, Underlying>` is a `~Copyable & ~Escapable` phantom-typed wra... | 2026-05-23T08:51:07 | 2026-05-28T11:10:24 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,562,846,615 | 89,418 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-28T09:57:08 | 2026-05-28T09:57:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,202,969 | 89,500 | artemcm | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-28T10:37:45 | 2026-05-28T10:37:45 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,422,293 | 89,470 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test windows platform | 2026-05-28T11:10:46 | 2026-05-28T11:10:46 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,342,178 | 89,462 | elsakeirouz | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T10:59:08 | 2026-05-28T10:59:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,421,133 | 88,017 | ktoso | @swift-ci please test windows | 2026-05-28T11:10:36 | 2026-05-28T11:10:36 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,562,887,632 | 89,499 | charles-zablit | @swift-ci please test windows | 2026-05-28T10:01:33 | 2026-05-28T10:01:33 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,419,364 | 89,389 | coenttb | Thanks @kavon — you're right on both counts.
We do enable `SuppressedAssociatedTypes`: the call that crashes, `Atomic<Tagged<…>>.advance(within:)`, is constrained on a suppressed associated type (`Ordinal.Domain: ~Copyable`). On further investigation, a compiler/runtime swap confirms it's codegen, not the demangler — ... | 2026-05-28T11:10:23 | 2026-05-28T11:10:23 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,241,039 | 89,501 | artemcm | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-28T10:43:30 | 2026-05-28T10:43:30 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,562,863,499 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test macos | 2026-05-28T09:58:51 | 2026-05-28T09:58:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,176,254 | 89,499 | charles-zablit | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T10:34:42 | 2026-05-28T10:34:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,018,237 | 89,499 | charles-zablit | @swift-ci please test windows | 2026-05-28T10:16:20 | 2026-05-28T10:16:20 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,413,212 | 89,494 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T11:09:28 | 2026-05-28T11:09:28 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,453,190 | 89,412 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-28T11:15:29 | 2026-05-28T11:15:29 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,564,251,869 | 89,502 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-28T13:06:58 | 2026-05-28T13:06:58 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,564,516,292 | 89,478 | airspeedswift | @swift-ci please smoke test Linux platform | 2026-05-28T13:37:35 | 2026-05-28T13:37:35 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,911,806 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test windows | 2026-05-28T12:20:38 | 2026-05-28T12:20:38 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,564,257,478 | 88,477 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T13:07:47 | 2026-05-28T13:07:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,845,125 | 89,418 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-28T12:10:53 | 2026-05-28T12:10:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,563,881,975 | 43,663 | sveinhal | Should this be closed? | 2026-05-28T12:16:14 | 2026-05-28T12:16:14 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,564,258,407 | 88,477 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test source compatibility | 2026-05-28T13:07:55 | 2026-05-28T13:07:55 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,564,386,686 | 88,920 | kovdan01 | @swift-ci apple silicon benchmark | 2026-05-28T13:24:28 | 2026-05-28T13:24:28 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,564,383,635 | 88,920 | kovdan01 | @eeckstein When composing a comment with explanation, I've realized that the patch should be extended in two ways (complementary to the new in-code comments added). See new changes in c6152e6222644ed7cd9fd2ca0f1f9840c3f53e8a
1. Add new SILOptimizer tests which would show the cases which would not become properly op... | 2026-05-28T13:24:07 | 2026-05-28T13:24:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,564,385,385 | 88,920 | kovdan01 | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-28T13:24:19 | 2026-05-28T13:24:19 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,564,527,735 | 89,503 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T13:38:38 | 2026-05-28T13:38:38 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,564,946,428 | 89,482 | natecook1000 | Toolchain is here: https://download.swift.org/tmp/pull-request/89213/2326/xcode/swift-PR-89213-2326-osx.tar.gz | 2026-05-28T14:18:23 | 2026-05-28T14:18:23 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,564,790,927 | 89,505 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T14:02:40 | 2026-05-28T14:02:40 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,565,147,995 | 88,477 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test source compatibility | 2026-05-28T14:35:27 | 2026-05-28T14:35:27 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,565,157,029 | 89,506 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-28T14:36:29 | 2026-05-28T14:36:29 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,565,165,052 | 89,506 | eeckstein | @swift-ci apple silicon benchmark | 2026-05-28T14:37:17 | 2026-05-28T14:37:17 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.