owner stringclasses 14
values | repo stringclasses 14
values | id int64 116k 4.61B | issue_number int32 1 181k | author stringlengths 1 39 | body stringlengths 1 262k | created_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:16:18 | updated_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:22:56 | reactions unknown | author_association stringclasses 5
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
swiftlang | swift | 4,565,178,534 | 89,464 | artemcm | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-driver/pull/2147
@swift-ci test | 2026-05-28T14:38:40 | 2026-05-28T14:38:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,564,692,220 | 89,484 | slavapestov | @swift-ci Please test Windows | 2026-05-28T13:53:42 | 2026-05-28T13:53:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,565,146,864 | 88,477 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T14:35:20 | 2026-05-28T14:35:20 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,565,307,336 | 89,430 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T14:50:39 | 2026-05-28T14:50:39 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,565,610,136 | 89,464 | artemcm | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-driver/pull/2147
@swift-ci test | 2026-05-28T15:23:17 | 2026-05-28T15:23:17 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,156,467 | 89,509 | jmschonfeld | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/527
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-foundation/pull/1999
@swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T16:28:34 | 2026-05-28T16:28:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,166,290 | 89,474 | jmschonfeld | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T16:29:52 | 2026-05-28T16:29:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,877,240 | 88,664 | keith | @DougGregor ptal | 2026-05-28T18:02:34 | 2026-05-28T18:02:34 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,123,724 | 88,822 | kavon | Looks like this same sort of fix was landed in `main` recently here: https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/88829 | 2026-05-28T16:24:15 | 2026-05-28T16:24:15 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,119,456 | 89,496 | tbkka | I tinkered a bit and this does seem to be due to the change in `debugDescription`. That change was deliberate -- `debugDescription` now prints NaN details (including sign, signaling, and payload if present) and `description` omits them. So that aspect I would consider "Behaves Correctly".
I'm not entirely sure why `... | 2026-05-28T16:23:44 | 2026-05-28T16:23:44 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,272,382 | 89,320 | MaxDesiatov | Apparently still reproducible on the blocked PR | 2026-05-28T16:43:58 | 2026-05-28T16:43:58 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,565,661,275 | 89,467 | grynspan | @swift-ci test Windows | 2026-05-28T15:29:13 | 2026-05-28T15:29:13 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,317,876 | 89,408 | mrousavy | awesome! thanks | 2026-05-28T16:50:03 | 2026-05-28T16:50:03 | {
"heart": 1
} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,724,563 | 89,516 | qiongsiwu | @swift-ci please test. | 2026-05-28T17:42:34 | 2026-05-28T17:42:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,858,897 | 88,650 | mikeash | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T18:00:07 | 2026-05-28T18:00:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,878,343 | 89,181 | mikeash | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T18:02:42 | 2026-05-28T18:02:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,565,959,443 | 89,508 | egorzhdan | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T16:03:38 | 2026-05-28T16:03:38 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,862,696 | 89,285 | mikeash | @swift-ci please test macos platform | 2026-05-28T18:00:37 | 2026-05-28T18:00:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,863,743 | 89,495 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T18:00:44 | 2026-05-28T18:00:44 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,565,733,027 | 89,504 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-28T15:37:30 | 2026-05-28T15:37:30 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,071,601 | 89,496 | tbkka | Can you verify that `print(value)` is using the `debugDescription` property in this case? That seems surprising. (This might really be a change in `print`, not a change in FP support.) | 2026-05-28T16:17:30 | 2026-05-28T16:17:30 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,260,837 | 89,432 | compnerd | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-28T16:42:24 | 2026-05-28T16:42:24 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,450,345 | 89,513 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T17:06:54 | 2026-05-28T17:06:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,539,463 | 89,487 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test macos platform | 2026-05-28T17:17:57 | 2026-05-28T17:17:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,858,330 | 88,650 | mikeash | Skipping the template as we're not aiming for 6.4. | 2026-05-28T18:00:03 | 2026-05-28T18:00:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,956,110 | 89,436 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T18:13:15 | 2026-05-28T18:13:15 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,567,422,036 | 89,517 | eeckstein | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-28T19:16:34 | 2026-05-28T19:16:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,301,238 | 89,510 | eeckstein | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-28T16:47:51 | 2026-05-28T16:47:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,452,832 | 84,710 | j-hui | This should be fixed by #88707.
It turns out the "inaccessible due to @_spi isolation level" diagnostic is the result of a botched recovery from a (harmless) deserialization failure, which is an artifact of namespaces being placed in the `__ObjC` module.
I was able to produce the @_spi error message with this minimal... | 2026-05-28T17:07:16 | 2026-05-28T17:07:16 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,483,458 | 88,583 | compnerd | Please build with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/521
@swift-ci please build toolchain Windows platform | 2026-05-28T17:10:51 | 2026-05-28T17:10:51 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,157,704 | 89,509 | jmschonfeld | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/527
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-foundation/pull/1999
@swift-ci please build toolchain | 2026-05-28T16:28:43 | 2026-05-28T16:28:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,315,150 | 89,485 | slavapestov | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-28T16:49:42 | 2026-05-28T16:49:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,865,125 | 89,333 | mikeash | @swift-ci please smoke test macos platform | 2026-05-28T18:00:55 | 2026-05-28T18:00:55 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,869,550 | 89,440 | mikeash | @swift-ci please test windows platform | 2026-05-28T18:01:31 | 2026-05-28T18:01:31 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,565,345,089 | 89,468 | edymtt | @swift-ci please build toolchain Windows | 2026-05-28T14:54:56 | 2026-05-28T14:54:56 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,565,941,795 | 89,469 | compnerd | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-28T16:01:27 | 2026-05-28T16:01:27 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,502,757 | 82,609 | j-hui | Should be fixed by #88707 | 2026-05-28T17:13:04 | 2026-05-28T17:13:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,127,410 | 87,136 | kavon | Resolved by https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/88829 | 2026-05-28T16:24:44 | 2026-05-28T16:24:44 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,313,206 | 89,168 | slavapestov | @swift-ci Please test macOS | 2026-05-28T16:49:27 | 2026-05-28T16:49:27 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,791,964 | 87,521 | Azoy | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T17:51:41 | 2026-05-28T17:51:41 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,863,272 | 88,765 | keith | thanks for the thoughtful review and quick turnaround! | 2026-05-28T18:00:41 | 2026-05-28T18:00:41 | {
"heart": 1
} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,147,138 | 89,365 | gottesmm | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-28T16:27:19 | 2026-05-28T16:27:19 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,229,712 | 89,389 | kavon | In the meantime, I'd recommend trying to migrate away from `SuppressedAssociatedTypes` on 6.4 / main now that the officially accepted defaults version is enabled by default. There's a migration guide [here](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/blob/main/userdocs/diagnostics/old-suppressed-associatedtypes.md) and if you h... | 2026-05-28T16:38:10 | 2026-05-28T16:38:10 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,590,272 | 89,515 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T17:24:24 | 2026-05-28T17:24:24 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,188,038 | 89,444 | xedin | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T16:32:39 | 2026-05-28T16:32:39 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,566,746,436 | 89,506 | meg-gupta | lgtm.
@eeckstein can you elaborate in the pr description how the hang was triggered due to this silcombine ? | 2026-05-28T17:45:44 | 2026-05-28T17:56:57 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,567,054,036 | 88,474 | xedin | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T18:26:45 | 2026-05-28T18:26:45 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,567,430,112 | 75,354 | jrflat | https://github.com/apple/swift-system/pull/303
@swift-ci build toolchain Windows | 2026-05-28T19:17:42 | 2026-05-28T19:17:42 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,567,671,807 | 84,782 | compnerd | Going to close this off, I think that @charles-zablit has a much better version of this change in flight. | 2026-05-28T19:52:24 | 2026-05-28T19:52:24 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,191,353 | 89,521 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T20:57:50 | 2026-05-28T20:57:50 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,543,336 | 89,495 | hnrklssn | **CI Failure:** [Swift Test macOS Platform (smoke test)](https://ci.swift.org/job/swift-PR-macos-smoke-test/28684/)
**Reason:** Infrastructure error detected
**Type:** Timeout
```
[2026-05-28T21:26:32.554Z] Cancelling nested steps due to timeout
```
Automatically retriggering CI to verify if this is a transient infra... | 2026-05-28T21:34:54 | 2026-05-28T21:34:54 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,543,404 | 89,495 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test macos platform | 2026-05-28T21:34:55 | 2026-05-28T21:34:55 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,567,851,204 | 89,518 | AnthonyLatsis | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T20:16:31 | 2026-05-28T20:16:31 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,502,471 | 89,495 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test macos platform | 2026-05-28T21:29:21 | 2026-05-28T21:29:21 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,210,146 | 89,522 | sepy97 | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T20:59:54 | 2026-05-28T20:59:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,502,402 | 89,495 | hnrklssn | **CI Failure:** [Swift Test macOS Platform (smoke test)](https://ci.swift.org/job/swift-PR-macos-smoke-test/28684/)
**Reason:** Infrastructure error detected
**Type:** Timeout
```
[2026-05-28T21:26:32.554Z] Cancelling nested steps due to timeout
```
Automatically retriggering CI to verify if this is a transient infra... | 2026-05-28T21:29:20 | 2026-05-28T21:29:20 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,567,479,430 | 87,521 | Azoy | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T19:25:03 | 2026-05-28T19:25:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,567,872,547 | 89,519 | a-viv-a | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-28T20:19:43 | 2026-05-28T20:19:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,567,911,408 | 86,848 | justice-adams-apple | @swift-ci Please Build Toolchain Ubuntu 26.04 | 2026-05-28T20:25:08 | 2026-05-28T20:25:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,118,244 | 89,133 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test Linux | 2026-05-28T20:49:54 | 2026-05-28T20:49:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,415,970 | 82,274 | bkhouri | Closing this to clean up my open PRs | 2026-05-28T21:20:23 | 2026-05-28T21:20:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,540,422 | 75,321 | itingliu | https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/5481
@swift-ci Please Build Toolchain Ubuntu 26.04 | 2026-05-28T21:34:25 | 2026-05-28T21:34:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,567,937,028 | 86,848 | justice-adams-apple | @swift-ci build toolchain Ubuntu 26.04 aarch64 | 2026-05-28T20:28:59 | 2026-05-28T20:28:59 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,567,849,845 | 88,583 | compnerd | Please build with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/521
@swift-ci please build toolchain Windows platform | 2026-05-28T20:16:19 | 2026-05-28T20:16:19 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,567,882,496 | 89,519 | a-viv-a | This came from my effort to add a preconcurrency note and not regress behavior wrt the `; this will be an error in`, but I had to pause working on it and its useful for other people (https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/compare/main...a-viv-a:swift:preconcurrency-note) | 2026-05-28T20:21:07 | 2026-05-28T20:21:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,575,771 | 89,382 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T21:40:41 | 2026-05-28T21:40:41 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,529,212 | 89,519 | ktoso | I suspect something off with the async sequence here; reverted
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89528 | 2026-05-29T00:55:47 | 2026-05-29T00:55:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,510,626 | 89,518 | AnthonyLatsis | @swift-ci please smoke test macOS | 2026-05-29T00:51:58 | 2026-05-29T00:51:58 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,055,730 | 87,506 | compnerd | I think that this is working fine for now. We can revisit it in the future if we need. | 2026-05-28T23:07:21 | 2026-05-28T23:07:21 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,757,514 | 88,898 | broken-circle | @hborla @slavapestov @xedin @hamishknight Would appreciate a review when you get a moment. | 2026-05-28T22:11:43 | 2026-05-28T22:11:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,496,717 | 88,017 | ktoso | We had to revert this -- cc @``NotTheNHK``
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89528
I'll reapply here: https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89529 | 2026-05-29T00:49:02 | 2026-05-29T00:49:02 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,316,008 | 89,526 | meg-gupta | @swift-ci apple silicon benchmark | 2026-05-29T00:06:29 | 2026-05-29T00:06:29 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,654,571 | 88,583 | compnerd | Please build with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/521
@swift-ci please build toolchain Windows platform | 2026-05-28T21:54:04 | 2026-05-28T21:54:04 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,842,012 | 89,523 | gottesmm | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-28T22:26:41 | 2026-05-28T22:26:41 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,314,718 | 89,526 | meg-gupta | @swift-ci test source compatibility | 2026-05-29T00:06:11 | 2026-05-29T00:06:11 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,932,460 | 89,524 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T22:41:40 | 2026-05-28T22:41:40 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,944,086 | 89,525 | ktoso | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T22:44:00 | 2026-05-28T22:44:00 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,311,402 | 89,526 | meg-gupta | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-29T00:05:26 | 2026-05-29T00:05:26 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,533,104 | 89,519 | a-viv-a | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-29T00:56:34 | 2026-05-29T00:56:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,850,973 | 86,082 | Bryce-MW | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T22:28:18 | 2026-05-28T22:28:18 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,400,256 | 89,527 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T00:26:23 | 2026-05-29T00:26:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,495,432 | 89,529 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T00:48:47 | 2026-05-29T00:48:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,944,552 | 89,524 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-28T22:44:06 | 2026-05-28T22:44:06 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,961,442 | 89,496 | xwu | Yes, I agree that `debugDescription` providing NaN details is correct: I have often relied on that information from at least Swift 4, pre-dating the recent changes, and I agree that it behaves correctly.
I am equally puzzled as you are why `print` is now doing this (when previously it clearly didn't) and agree that th... | 2026-05-28T22:47:37 | 2026-05-28T22:53:29 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,568,994,277 | 89,519 | a-viv-a | @swift-ci Please test | 2026-05-28T22:53:56 | 2026-05-28T22:53:56 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,281,231 | 87,518 | kavon | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-28T23:58:16 | 2026-05-28T23:58:16 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,132,987 | 89,310 | atrick | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-28T23:23:06 | 2026-05-28T23:23:06 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,237,129 | 89,515 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-28T23:47:32 | 2026-05-28T23:47:32 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,522,579 | 89,530 | j-hui | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T00:54:27 | 2026-05-29T00:54:27 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,054,526 | 88,474 | xedin | @mlvea Looks like this change also fixes a crasher, could you please update it as well? | 2026-05-28T23:07:07 | 2026-05-28T23:07:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,636,669 | 89,444 | xedin | @swift-ci please smoke test Windows platform | 2026-05-29T01:16:23 | 2026-05-29T01:16:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,751,772 | 89,531 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci Please test WebAssembly | 2026-05-29T01:41:48 | 2026-05-29T01:41:48 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,807,158 | 89,365 | gottesmm | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-29T01:53:25 | 2026-05-29T01:53:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,809,574 | 89,448 | akyrtzi | @swift-ci smoke test linux platform | 2026-05-29T01:54:05 | 2026-05-29T01:54:05 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,750,481 | 89,531 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci Please test android | 2026-05-29T01:41:34 | 2026-05-29T01:41:34 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,784,935 | 89,532 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T01:48:09 | 2026-05-29T01:48:09 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,886,581 | 89,469 | compnerd | @swift-ci please test Windows platform | 2026-05-29T02:13:22 | 2026-05-29T02:13:22 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,746,165 | 89,531 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T01:40:44 | 2026-05-29T01:40:44 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,811,016 | 89,448 | akyrtzi | @swift-ci Please test Windows platform | 2026-05-29T01:54:27 | 2026-05-29T01:54:27 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,904,813 | 89,178 | Julioacarrettoni | Sadly it doesn't seem to be working on main for me, I ran it on `main-snapshot-2026-05-27`, and I ran `swift package reset` right before to ensure it would be re-compiled from scratch, should I do something different?
Thank you.
```bash
> swiftly use main-snapshot
The global defaul... | 2026-05-29T02:17:40 | 2026-05-29T02:19:43 | {} | NONE |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.