owner stringclasses 14
values | repo stringclasses 14
values | id int64 116k 4.61B | issue_number int32 1 181k | author stringlengths 1 39 | body stringlengths 1 262k | created_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:16:18 | updated_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:22:56 | reactions unknown | author_association stringclasses 5
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,143,628 | 89,531 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-29T03:16:43 | 2026-05-29T03:16:43 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,144,205 | 89,531 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci Please test WebAssembly | 2026-05-29T03:16:50 | 2026-05-29T03:16:50 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,924,794 | 88,474 | xedin | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-29T02:22:04 | 2026-05-29T02:22:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,144,881 | 89,531 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci Please test android | 2026-05-29T03:16:56 | 2026-05-29T03:16:56 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,000,428 | 89,519 | ktoso | Seems the issue was https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/89533 | 2026-05-29T02:40:49 | 2026-05-29T02:40:49 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,569,928,094 | 89,432 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T02:22:37 | 2026-05-29T02:22:37 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,155,381 | 89,365 | gottesmm | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-29T03:18:55 | 2026-05-29T03:18:55 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,178,408 | 89,513 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T03:23:31 | 2026-05-29T03:23:31 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,257,789 | 89,510 | eeckstein | @swift-ci test windows | 2026-05-29T03:38:08 | 2026-05-29T03:38:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,304,085 | 89,534 | eeckstein | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-29T03:46:41 | 2026-05-29T03:46:41 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,255,877 | 89,497 | eeckstein | @AnthonyLatsis Can you please cherry-pick this to 6.4? I've seen this test failing in 6.4 PR testing: https://ci-external.swift.org/job/swift-PR-windows/55705/console | 2026-05-29T03:37:45 | 2026-05-29T03:37:45 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,367,330 | 89,533 | ktoso | rdar://178204808 | 2026-05-29T03:56:09 | 2026-05-29T03:56:09 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,471,447 | 89,536 | compnerd | CC: @madsodgaard | 2026-05-29T04:16:18 | 2026-05-29T04:16:18 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,437,640 | 89,535 | AnthonyLatsis | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-29T04:07:19 | 2026-05-29T04:07:19 | {} | COLLABORATOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,471,788 | 89,536 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T04:16:23 | 2026-05-29T04:16:23 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,598,626 | 89,536 | madsodgaard | Hm this does not actually seem right.
The changes we did with API notes should mean that `FILE` should always import as OpaquePointer on Android, never as a typed pointer.
| 2026-05-29T04:31:57 | 2026-05-29T04:31:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,326,757 | 89,477 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T03:50:43 | 2026-05-29T03:50:43 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,641,317 | 89,494 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please test macOS | 2026-05-29T04:37:53 | 2026-05-29T04:37:53 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,641,414 | 89,536 | compnerd | Then the APINotes are not always being loaded. | 2026-05-29T04:37:54 | 2026-05-29T04:37:54 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,676,605 | 89,524 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T04:42:35 | 2026-05-29T04:42:35 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,680,391 | 89,525 | ktoso | Minor follow up from review on main, just a style cleanup | 2026-05-29T04:43:20 | 2026-05-29T04:43:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,681,503 | 89,525 | ktoso | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-29T04:43:29 | 2026-05-29T04:43:29 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,571,085,055 | 88,583 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T05:42:02 | 2026-05-29T05:42:02 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,571,074,763 | 89,365 | gottesmm | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-29T05:40:34 | 2026-05-29T05:40:34 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,832,449 | 89,382 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test Windows | 2026-05-29T05:06:25 | 2026-05-29T05:06:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,749,772 | 89,537 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T04:53:59 | 2026-05-29T04:53:59 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,840,268 | 89,513 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T05:08:18 | 2026-05-29T05:08:18 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,570,814,997 | 87,518 | kavon | @swift-ci test macOS | 2026-05-29T05:03:19 | 2026-05-29T05:03:19 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,571,088,071 | 88,583 | compnerd | LLDB flaked, but the build succeeded: https://ci-external.swift.org/job/swift-PR-build-toolchain-windows/6552/artifact/build/artifacts/ | 2026-05-29T05:42:24 | 2026-05-29T05:42:24 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,571,666,125 | 89,531 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-29T06:46:07 | 2026-05-29T06:46:07 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,571,142,167 | 88,583 | compnerd | Please build with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/521
@swift-ci please build toolchain Windows platform | 2026-05-29T05:48:24 | 2026-05-29T05:48:24 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,571,462,143 | 88,474 | xedin | @swift-ci please clean test macOS platform | 2026-05-29T06:22:24 | 2026-05-29T06:22:24 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,571,737,112 | 89,519 | a-viv-a | @swift-ci Please test macOS | 2026-05-29T06:54:29 | 2026-05-29T06:54:29 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,571,949,088 | 89,538 | iXerol | @xedin since you authored both the initial [`swiftlang/llvm-project` change](https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/commit/6f174125f0b7a) and the upstream LLVM fix that completed it by including `Attr*` in `AttributedType::Profile` (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d3daa3c4435a54f7876d0ced81787fea92e77d08... | 2026-05-29T07:16:10 | 2026-05-29T07:16:10 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,571,908,787 | 89,539 | eeckstein | @swift-ci test | 2026-05-29T07:12:35 | 2026-05-29T07:12:35 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,572,060,059 | 89,540 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-29T07:30:21 | 2026-05-29T07:30:21 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,572,927,033 | 89,541 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-29T09:04:44 | 2026-05-29T09:04:44 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,573,028,142 | 89,459 | ahoppen | I honestly can’t tell you because I haven’t diagnosed the issue far enough myself. If you want to take a stab at this, the steps would be:
1. Generate a minimal project that reproduces the crash
2. Build the compiler and generate a test case in `test/IDE/complete_*` that also reproduces the issue
3. Debug the issue and... | 2026-05-29T09:13:14 | 2026-05-29T09:13:14 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,573,013,940 | 89,542 | eeckstein | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-29T09:11:51 | 2026-05-29T09:11:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,573,029,954 | 89,500 | artemcm | @swift-ci smoke test Windows platform | 2026-05-29T09:13:22 | 2026-05-29T09:13:22 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,573,078,506 | 89,470 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci test windows platform | 2026-05-29T09:17:32 | 2026-05-29T09:17:32 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,572,990,307 | 89,536 | finagolfin | OK, I may have tracked this down: it looks like [the Windows installer lists each Android API note separately](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/blob/main/platforms/Windows/platforms/android/android.wxs#L815), unlike ~linux/Mac~ our SDK bundle packaging script where all are copied over. You will like... | 2026-05-29T09:09:48 | 2026-05-29T09:52:26 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,573,230,741 | 89,412 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-29T09:31:06 | 2026-05-29T09:31:06 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,573,479,157 | 89,514 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-29T09:51:51 | 2026-05-29T09:51:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,573,391,746 | 89,529 | NotTheNHK | @ktoso Thanks for the review and for taking care of this! Well, at least we uncovered a rather nasty bug. | 2026-05-29T09:44:02 | 2026-05-29T09:44:02 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,573,470,107 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci test android | 2026-05-29T09:51:07 | 2026-05-29T09:51:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,573,393,212 | 89,525 | ktoso | @swift-ci please test Windows | 2026-05-29T09:44:11 | 2026-05-29T09:44:11 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,573,469,188 | 89,260 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-29T09:51:03 | 2026-05-29T09:51:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,573,742,366 | 89,524 | ktoso | @swift-ci please smoke test macOS | 2026-05-29T10:13:33 | 2026-05-29T10:13:33 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,574,162,209 | 89,471 | Snowy1803 | The CI on the NFC pull request this one is based on is taking forever due to unrelated issues. This one passed CI, so I'll merge this one which will include the other one. | 2026-05-29T10:59:52 | 2026-05-29T10:59:52 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,574,205,370 | 89,521 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test Windows | 2026-05-29T11:05:17 | 2026-05-29T11:05:17 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,574,204,855 | 89,521 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please smoke test macOS | 2026-05-29T11:05:12 | 2026-05-29T11:05:12 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,574,335,027 | 89,412 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-29T11:22:00 | 2026-05-29T11:22:00 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,574,301,777 | 89,283 | ktoso | It shouldn't matter but i'm waiting for https://github.com/swiftlang/llvm-project/pull/13074 to pass and merge first. | 2026-05-29T11:17:52 | 2026-05-29T11:17:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,574,072,796 | 89,471 | Snowy1803 | I have verified that on a program where PhiExpansion occurs on a debug value, the result is the same before the change (using fragments), and after the change (using a debug reconstruction block):
```swift
struct Pt {
var x, y: Int
}
@inline(never)
func makeTrue(x: Int = 0) -> Bool {
print(x)
retu... | 2026-05-29T10:47:43 | 2026-05-29T10:57:44 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,573,988,684 | 89,518 | hamishknight | 👍 | 2026-05-29T10:38:45 | 2026-05-29T10:38:45 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,574,307,966 | 89,504 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-29T11:18:49 | 2026-05-29T11:18:49 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,574,404,916 | 89,544 | DougGregor | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-29T11:30:05 | 2026-05-29T11:30:05 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,575,164,424 | 89,524 | ktoso | @swift-ci please test windows | 2026-05-29T12:45:36 | 2026-05-29T12:45:36 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,575,088,194 | 89,546 | egorzhdan | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-29T12:38:50 | 2026-05-29T12:38:50 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,575,133,677 | 88,368 | GabrielSilveiraa | Hi @jamieQ @xedin @hamishknight. Just following this up. Appreciate if you can take a look at this when you get a chance, thanks!
| 2026-05-29T12:42:57 | 2026-05-29T12:42:57 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,575,175,757 | 89,529 | ktoso | Hmm... CI is happy here, I'll coordinate with @a-viv-a's PR though, something fishy going on, we definitely hit a real issue. Probably not triggered "yet" | 2026-05-29T12:46:31 | 2026-05-29T12:46:31 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,575,465,523 | 89,515 | tshortli | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-29T13:12:25 | 2026-05-29T13:12:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,575,889,155 | 89,261 | plemarquand | Please test with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-package-manager/pull/10135
@swift-ci please test macOS Platform | 2026-05-29T13:43:35 | 2026-05-29T13:43:35 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,575,923,666 | 89,547 | aidan-hall | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-29T13:47:35 | 2026-05-29T13:47:35 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,575,588,207 | 89,537 | tshortli | Thanks! | 2026-05-29T13:20:49 | 2026-05-29T13:20:49 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,575,891,147 | 89,261 | plemarquand | Please test with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-package-manager/pull/10135
@swift-ci please test Windows Platform | 2026-05-29T13:43:48 | 2026-05-29T13:43:48 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,575,966,192 | 89,463 | Paul-Passeron | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T13:52:26 | 2026-05-29T13:52:26 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,575,980,532 | 86,180 | soumyamahunt | Any update on this? I would love some workaround that will just show warning in these kind of cases than give errors (without having to turn off region based isolation entirely). | 2026-05-29T13:54:18 | 2026-05-29T13:54:18 | {} | NONE |
swiftlang | swift | 4,576,232,988 | 89,549 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-29T14:24:25 | 2026-05-29T14:24:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,576,299,566 | 89,546 | egorzhdan | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-29T14:30:31 | 2026-05-29T14:30:31 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,576,233,578 | 89,549 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci build toolchain | 2026-05-29T14:24:29 | 2026-05-29T14:24:29 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,576,237,738 | 89,541 | MaxDesiatov | @swift-ci test windows | 2026-05-29T14:24:52 | 2026-05-29T14:24:52 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,576,794,318 | 86,180 | mattmassicotte | FWIW both of these examples compile successfully for me with the main branch
`6.5-dev (LLVM 8f81a64f6a8bcf6, Swift 4d0c97fa5b05711)` | 2026-05-29T15:15:23 | 2026-05-29T15:15:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,139,048 | 89,536 | compnerd | > OK, I may have tracked this down: it looks like [the Windows installer lists each Android API note separately](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/blob/main/platforms/Windows/platforms/android/android.wxs#L815), unlike ~linux/Mac~ our SDK bundle packaging script where all are copied over. You will li... | 2026-05-29T15:45:45 | 2026-05-29T15:45:45 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,104,867 | 89,477 | compnerd | @swift-ci please build toolchain Windows platform | 2026-05-29T15:42:03 | 2026-05-29T15:42:03 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,576,988,919 | 89,521 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please test Windows | 2026-05-29T15:30:43 | 2026-05-29T15:30:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,337,822 | 89,510 | tbkka | I believe you said you have a more robust solution to this issue in `main`? | 2026-05-29T16:06:00 | 2026-05-29T16:06:00 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,226,857 | 88,583 | compnerd | Please build with following PRs:
https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-installer-scripts/pull/521
@swift-ci please build toolchain Windows platform | 2026-05-29T15:56:29 | 2026-05-29T15:56:29 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,196,094 | 89,537 | xedin | @swift-ci please smoke test macOS | 2026-05-29T15:53:01 | 2026-05-29T15:53:01 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,215,659 | 89,432 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T15:55:17 | 2026-05-29T15:55:17 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,576,990,177 | 89,521 | hamishknight | @swift-ci please smoke test macOS | 2026-05-29T15:30:50 | 2026-05-29T15:30:50 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,093,057 | 89,404 | bkhouri | I believe this is currently an issue with the base docker image used to build the linux toolchain, which I believe is based on Swift 5.x, while the Swift Argument Parser 1.8.1 has a minimum of Swift 6.0.
it might require https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-docker/pull/560, which will need to be thoroughly tested to e... | 2026-05-29T15:40:55 | 2026-05-29T15:44:07 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,576,972,321 | 89,550 | Snowy1803 | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-29T15:29:17 | 2026-05-29T15:29:17 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,490,460 | 89,527 | tshortli | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T16:25:32 | 2026-05-29T16:25:32 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,571,627,300 | 89,536 | finagolfin | Where do you see this failure exactly? [The Windows trunk snapshot toolchain CI](https://ci-external.swift.org/job/swift-main-windows-toolchain/) cross-compiles `swift-inspect` for Android without a problem, [which it wasn't before](https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/88435#issuecomment-4238551689) Mads's API note ... | 2026-05-29T06:39:27 | 2026-05-29T17:28:15 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,543,534 | 89,545 | broken-circle | This looks like it may land in the same area as #88644: a pack expansion whose pattern projects an associated type off a pack element (`(repeat (each S).Iterator.Element)` there, `repeat (each Element).Executable` here), used as a generic/opaque argument in a return type. Both have variants that compile with that const... | 2026-05-29T16:32:00 | 2026-05-29T16:32:00 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,815,136 | 88,868 | charles-zablit | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-29T17:06:48 | 2026-05-29T17:06:48 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,578,790,637 | 89,552 | gottesmm | @NotTheNHK https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/89552/changes#diff-f0080898986e595ab748beefce82cb25126d1d1676ec9979572c041a03bf839eR315 | 2026-05-29T18:53:24 | 2026-05-29T18:53:24 | {
"+1": 1
} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,675,023 | 88,474 | xedin | @swift-ci please test macOS platform | 2026-05-29T16:48:44 | 2026-05-29T16:48:44 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,578,569,295 | 89,552 | gottesmm | @swift-ci smoke test | 2026-05-29T18:28:51 | 2026-05-29T18:28:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,578,573,730 | 89,519 | a-viv-a | @swift-ci Please test macOS | 2026-05-29T18:29:26 | 2026-05-29T18:29:26 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,578,847,602 | 89,529 | NotTheNHK | I think so too. I wonder why it only affected macOS. Since the Mem2Reg issue also affects Linux AFAICT. Probably unrelated, but I still haven’t figured out the root cause of the Windows CI failure from a few weeks back.
Perhaps we should kick off a complete CI run just to see what happens? | 2026-05-29T18:59:08 | 2026-05-29T18:59:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,682,688 | 89,431 | tshortli | No longer crashes on `main`. Instead, it prints this diagnostic:
```
INTERNAL ERROR: feature not implemented: throw conversion from 'InnerError' to 'OuterError'
``` | 2026-05-29T16:49:57 | 2026-05-29T16:49:57 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,995,783 | 89,244 | egorzhdan | API Notes currently don't support annotating macros, unfortunately. | 2026-05-29T17:30:53 | 2026-05-29T17:30:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,578,097,313 | 89,531 | hnrklssn | **CI Failure:** [Swift Test Linux Platform](https://ci.swift.org/job/swift-PR-Linux/28005/)
**Reason:** Infrastructure error detected
**Type:** Jenkins error
```
[2026-05-29T17:41:29.254Z] [Pipeline] sh
```
Automatically retriggering CI to verify if this is a transient infrastructure issue. | 2026-05-29T17:42:10 | 2026-05-29T17:42:10 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,578,682,489 | 89,557 | cachemeifyoucan | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T18:42:08 | 2026-05-29T18:42:08 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
swiftlang | swift | 4,579,279,816 | 89,432 | compnerd | @swift-ci please smoke test | 2026-05-29T19:46:47 | 2026-05-29T19:46:47 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,640,480 | 89,531 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci please test | 2026-05-29T16:44:03 | 2026-05-29T16:44:03 | {} | MEMBER |
swiftlang | swift | 4,577,642,398 | 89,531 | hnrklssn | @swift-ci Please test android | 2026-05-29T16:44:21 | 2026-05-29T16:44:21 | {} | MEMBER |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.