owner stringclasses 14
values | repo stringclasses 14
values | id int64 116k 4.61B | issue_number int32 1 181k | author stringlengths 1 39 | body stringlengths 1 262k | created_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:16:18 | updated_at timestamp[us]date 2000-06-06 02:40:44 2026-06-02 20:22:56 | reactions unknown | author_association stringclasses 5
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vuejs | core | 542,298,553 | 297 | yyx990803 | I'm not sure if these tests are really necessary. These functionalities will be tested as part of higher-level integration tests in `vue`. | 2019-10-15T16:31:20 | 2019-10-15T16:31:20 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 542,375,977 | 300 | ZhangJian-3ti | They are mostly very stable items. I think it's a trade off for smaller package size. If you really want to write items separately, just use String template also can achieve the same purpose. | 2019-10-15T19:49:36 | 2019-10-15T19:49:36 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,398,329 | 281 | vue-bot | Hey @alk831, thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-15T20:49:16 | 2019-10-15T20:49:16 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,420,781 | 306 | vue-bot | Hey @dependabot-preview[bot], thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-15T21:52:25 | 2019-10-15T21:52:25 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,427,995 | 302 | yyx990803 | Thanks but I honestly don't think the value provided by these type changes justify the additional complexity they introduce. | 2019-10-15T22:15:31 | 2019-10-15T22:15:31 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 542,725,063 | 313 | vue-bot | Hey @pikax, thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-16T14:20:05 | 2019-10-16T14:20:05 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,730,979 | 318 | pikax | Is it worth to add tests for those cases? Since all tests were passing | 2019-10-16T14:32:05 | 2019-10-16T14:32:05 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 543,805,412 | 324 | yyx990803 | @pikax yes, we will eventually do that. Just leaving it for later to avoid distractions now. | 2019-10-18T15:47:48 | 2019-10-18T15:47:48 | {
"+1": 2
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 541,832,963 | 281 | adamlewkowicz | Prettier has been failing for this commit, so please make sure everything is ok :) | 2019-10-14T18:10:33 | 2019-10-14T18:10:33 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 541,868,623 | 281 | yyx990803 | This is great. Can you add a test case for this? | 2019-10-14T19:18:35 | 2019-10-14T19:18:35 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 542,186,214 | 292 | pikax | I see what you mean, this should be enough
```ts
type KeyedEvent = KeyboardEvent | MouseEvent | TouchEvent;
// ...
!(e as KeyedEvent).ctrlKey,
``` | 2019-10-15T12:26:52 | 2019-10-15T12:26:52 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 542,204,659 | 294 | pikax | some findings:
- `indexOf` is faster than set for array of object if the length is less than 40, but performs worse if the list contains string or numbers
- lodash.uniq performs much faster in small arrays and faster on arrays > 800 items
| 2019-10-15T13:13:10 | 2019-10-15T13:13:10 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 543,319,337 | 315 | vue-bot | Thanks again! 💚
| 2019-10-17T19:09:54 | 2019-10-17T19:09:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 543,621,600 | 324 | pikax | Personally I don't like filters, they are only a method in disguised.
Hiding it under a flag, seems a good approach.
@yyx990803 shouldn't we discuss the drop of filters on RFC? | 2019-10-18T09:15:22 | 2019-10-18T09:15:22 | {
"+1": 4
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 543,753,632 | 331 | jo0ger | I think the problem is the inference of `Array<infer V>`
``` ts
type ArrayA = Ref<[number, Ref<string>, Ref<Ref<boolean>>, Ref<string>]>
```
The inferred type is `string | number | boolean | Ref<string> | Ref<Ref<boolean>>`，It doesn't extend any type
But I think the following is better：
```ts
// changed... | 2019-10-18T13:42:33 | 2019-10-18T13:43:46 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,298,561 | 292 | vue-bot | Hey @pikax, thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-15T16:31:22 | 2019-10-15T16:31:22 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,403,650 | 290 | vue-bot | Hey @HcySunYang, thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-15T21:03:03 | 2019-10-15T21:03:03 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,409,295 | 303 | vue-bot | Hey @ivansieder, thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-15T21:18:37 | 2019-10-15T21:18:37 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,420,742 | 305 | vue-bot | Hey @dependabot-preview[bot], thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-15T21:52:17 | 2019-10-15T21:52:17 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,723,231 | 312 | vue-bot | Hey @soouup, thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-16T14:16:15 | 2019-10-16T14:16:15 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,859,608 | 319 | vue-bot | Hey @pikax, thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-16T19:39:53 | 2019-10-16T19:39:53 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,904,603 | 321 | vue-bot | Hey @dependabot-preview[bot], thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-16T21:44:47 | 2019-10-16T21:44:47 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 541,822,525 | 252 | dsseng | @yyx990803 I fixed all the requested changes | 2019-10-14T17:50:44 | 2019-10-14T17:50:44 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,267,835 | 286 | vue-bot | Hey @yeyan1996, thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-15T15:23:28 | 2019-10-15T15:23:28 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,292,220 | 282 | vue-bot | Hey @ayush987goyal, thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-15T16:16:09 | 2019-10-15T16:16:09 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,533,678 | 301 | vue-bot | Hey @Tidyzq, thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-16T06:03:12 | 2019-10-16T06:03:12 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,728,375 | 318 | yyx990803 | All of these cases are intentional. We want the flag to **only** be that specific flag. | 2019-10-16T14:26:52 | 2019-10-16T14:26:52 | {
"+1": 1
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 543,317,244 | 322 | yyx990803 | This actually doesn't matter because... in production they are all converted into `void 0` by minifiers. | 2019-10-17T19:04:09 | 2019-10-17T19:04:09 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 543,318,236 | 323 | vue-bot | Hey @pikax, thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-17T19:06:54 | 2019-10-17T19:06:54 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 543,636,768 | 330 | laquasicinque | Surely Object would provide the biggest performance increase? https://jsperf.com/regandset/3
Edit: different perf test so that it always returns a boolean | 2019-10-18T09:43:33 | 2019-10-18T09:46:55 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,420,665 | 304 | vue-bot | Hey @dependabot-preview[bot], thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-15T21:52:04 | 2019-10-15T21:52:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,425,133 | 300 | yyx990803 | I don't think this makes that much of a difference - I personally find the csv reading just fine. | 2019-10-15T22:05:45 | 2019-10-15T22:05:52 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 542,748,173 | 319 | CyberAP | > I'm concern on how our benchmarks are yielding different results 🤔
You last test assigns to `window.i` | 2019-10-16T15:07:55 | 2019-10-16T15:07:55 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,754,916 | 319 | CyberAP | By the way right now `fill` is hilariously slow in Firefox.
Maybe it'd be better to extract that into a shared function? Although I don't know if there are any more places where a fixed array is filled.
| 2019-10-16T15:21:51 | 2019-10-16T15:21:51 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 543,321,488 | 324 | yyx990803 | This is very well done... but we are actually considering removing filters in v3. We do need this for v2 compat, so we need to wrap filter-related parts under a [feature flag](https://github.com/vuejs/vue-next/blob/master/rollup.config.js#L161-L162) and reduce its footprint as much as we can when it's not enabled in a ... | 2019-10-17T19:16:05 | 2019-10-17T19:16:05 | {
"+1": 3
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 541,877,428 | 217 | yyx990803 | Looks good - yes let's work on `isCustomElement` in a separate PR. | 2019-10-14T19:36:17 | 2019-10-14T19:36:17 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 542,740,235 | 314 | vue-bot | Hey @pikax, thank you for your time and effort spent on this PR, contributions like yours help make Vue better for everyone. Cheers! 💚
| 2019-10-16T14:51:43 | 2019-10-16T14:51:43 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 542,774,765 | 319 | pikax | Nice catch, I copied the code from the source code, probably better as you said @yyx990803 | 2019-10-16T16:04:58 | 2019-10-16T16:04:58 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 543,317,541 | 315 | yyx990803 | Thanks! | 2019-10-17T19:04:58 | 2019-10-17T19:04:58 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 636,964,895 | 1,283 | leopiccionia | The minified version may have these replacements automatically.
But authoring code with more verbose code may be more comfortable. | 2020-06-01T16:19:50 | 2020-06-01T16:19:50 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 637,233,304 | 1,284 | allowing | 
I got some error with above image and don‘t get error which is same with you. I cloned your repo just now.
Is it miss something for me or you? | 2020-06-07T06:30:09 | 2020-06-07T06:30:09 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 640,320,824 | 1,304 | underfin | I pull the lasted code from your repo and do something with you said.You maybe ingore add `task` routes in `routes.json` and I run it success after I add that.
Hmm.But I don‘t get the error when click `edit` button.As you say, it work fine with your code.If you still have this bug.Please provider an minimum reporduct... | 2020-06-08T01:59:01 | 2020-06-08T01:59:01 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 637,027,083 | 1,283 | yyx990803 | Also a tip: in general, it is not recommended to suggest code style changes to other people's codebase. Everyone has their own preferences and you should respect what the authors have chosen to go with unless there are objective performance/correctness concerns. | 2020-06-01T18:22:04 | 2020-06-01T18:22:35 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 640,427,070 | 1,318 | pikax | This is a bug, you can replace `:value` with `v-model` until this gets fixed.
This bug is caused by the `value` is being assigned before the `select` children are rendered.
I'm looking for a fix for it.
| 2020-06-08T07:42:42 | 2020-06-08T07:42:42 | {
"+1": 2
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 637,636,064 | 1,281 | yyx990803 | There are some internal heuristics based on amount of nodes with bindings to determine whether a piece of content is static hoisted. However I think it's reasonable to bail on multi-element stringification directly inside a slot. i.e. root level nodes inside a slot should be preserved, but they themselves can stringify... | 2020-06-02T15:43:27 | 2020-06-02T15:43:27 | {
"+1": 2
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 640,240,475 | 1,304 | shortpoet | Since that server requires MongoDb and that seems like a lot to ask for this issue, I created a mock server and pushed it in this commit: [mock server](https://github.com/shortpoet/JobDash/tree/0e2236ddbe687c20cfa6715818eff99a70754e5f/dashboard/tests/__mocks__)
can be accessed and run by:
```
cd /dashboard/tests/_... | 2020-06-07T16:01:42 | 2020-06-07T16:01:42 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 641,535,348 | 1,304 | shortpoet | @pikax thank you very much for that handy resource!
@underfin update:
I haven't been able to recreate that bug, even in my own app at this point.
My best guess is that it had to do with either the root elements as I mentioned or, and this seems even more likely now, a misuse of provide/inject.
As part of th... | 2020-06-09T19:53:39 | 2020-06-09T19:53:39 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 637,688,502 | 1,237 | haoqunjiang | There's the tool called `only-allow`: https://www.npmjs.com/package/only-allow
Maybe it's a better alternative? | 2020-06-02T17:12:55 | 2020-06-02T17:12:55 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 638,840,484 | 1,293 | cexbrayat | @pikax Sure, done! | 2020-06-04T13:16:39 | 2020-06-04T13:16:39 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 639,843,322 | 1,005 | shortpoet | I'm not very experienced so, not sure if it helps, or if this is the correct place, but just in case...
I came across this issue when googling the following warning:
> Extraneous non-emits event listeners (update-contacts) were passed to component but could not be automatically inherited because component render... | 2020-06-05T21:53:47 | 2020-06-05T21:53:47 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 639,996,159 | 1,308 | underfin | https://github.com/vuejs/vue-next/pull/1269 | 2020-06-06T06:44:32 | 2020-06-06T06:44:32 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 640,004,565 | 1,306 | underfin | https://github.com/vuejs/vue-next/pull/1230 | 2020-06-06T07:35:08 | 2020-06-06T07:35:08 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 640,235,239 | 1,304 | shortpoet | That network error is from the API call to the nest server. From the project root run:
```
cd server
yarn start
```
That way you only get the reported error.
I filed another similar issue which I was looking for just now. I guess it either got deleted or I didn't press the submit button.
I thought I ha... | 2020-06-07T15:24:08 | 2020-06-07T15:24:08 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 641,315,225 | 1,102 | milewski | Wo ye you zhege wenti.. you ren zhidao zenme bang? | 2020-06-09T13:58:26 | 2020-06-09T13:58:26 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 641,541,378 | 1,155 | yyx990803 | This is actually close to what Optional Props Declaration is, and has the same problem when dealing with attrs fallthrough:
- No fallthrough -> use `class` and `style` on the component but find them not applied to root, confusing
- Fallthrough -> all the props you intend to use for state only are also applied to ... | 2020-06-09T20:06:38 | 2020-06-09T20:11:01 | {
"+1": 1,
"confused": 2
} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 641,957,222 | 1,315 | Jackbennett | That makes sense, Just coming back to it though because it works perfectly fine when running in `dev`. You run `build` and find the classes stripped out. No warnings are thrown, should it?
I have seen that fragmented root warning message but not doing this. I can see why v-else-if makes much better sense. | 2020-06-10T12:01:39 | 2020-06-10T12:01:39 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 642,253,876 | 1,306 | yyx990803 | Closed via https://github.com/fuchunhui/vue-next/commit/a215feda451810251e37dabf5027c9cb0a2b82bf | 2020-06-10T20:56:45 | 2020-06-10T20:56:45 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 638,252,620 | 1,287 | yyx990803 | This is expected. If you need to remount the same app, put your app creation logic in a factory function and call it again to create a new app instance. | 2020-06-03T14:56:36 | 2020-06-03T14:56:36 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 638,612,373 | 1,237 | limichange | @sodatea I think a little code better than include a package. | 2020-06-04T05:33:20 | 2020-06-04T05:33:20 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 639,475,953 | 1,294 | AlexandreBonaventure | @allowing I don't think it is the same issue at all.
---
I fixed the issue here: #1302
Believe or not, I found one of the weirdest issue with destructuring on Edge 44, and this is what is causing the issue. Somehow, it seems like destructuring arrays with object syntax is straight up broken on edge 44. I had a h... | 2020-06-05T13:20:48 | 2020-06-05T13:21:29 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 641,516,128 | 1,331 | benmccann | Thanks for taking the time to investigate and explain! | 2020-06-09T19:13:21 | 2020-06-09T19:13:21 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 641,584,251 | 1,230 | yyx990803 | - `context.parent` is only usable during the normal transform phase. Static hoisting phase is a post-transform so `context.parent` is not accurate in this case.
- No need to bail on `p` because anything can be placed inside `p` can be placed in `div`. Also `colspan` is not an element.
- It should be enough to jus... | 2020-06-09T21:15:53 | 2020-06-09T21:15:53 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 641,591,507 | 1,254 | yyx990803 | Closed via https://github.com/vuejs/vue-next/commit/a938b61edca63c1f03f99b85de3f2a3a519268e6 | 2020-06-09T21:27:49 | 2020-06-09T21:27:49 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 636,965,998 | 1,283 | posva | Thank you but as said in the others PR, we find the version with if/else to be more readable in most scenarios. | 2020-06-01T16:20:44 | 2020-06-01T16:20:44 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 637,026,034 | 1,276 | yyx990803 | If WeChat browser doesn't support ES2015 then the current version of `vue-next` won't run. That's expected. Otherwise, you'll have to wait for the IE11 compatible build. | 2020-06-01T18:19:44 | 2020-06-01T18:19:44 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 638,180,304 | 1,284 | Mister-Hope | > The reason is iOS 11.3 still not support the Proxy. 🥶🥶🥶I can't believe the Android 6 supported nice so much.
HHHHH 🤣 Why unbelievable? | 2020-06-03T12:59:37 | 2020-06-03T12:59:37 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 639,207,403 | 1,290 | underfin | Yeah.Do it with https://github.com/vuejs/vue-next/pull/1297. | 2020-06-05T01:40:08 | 2020-06-05T01:40:08 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 640,810,252 | 1,304 | shortpoet | Hey so I tried to use the tabs/dynamic import again and the bug reappeared. I tried making a codesanbox but I'm not sure how to get the new version of vue running there. Is there an example sandbox with basic config you can send me? I can then try and reproduce the error using the same thing I am trying. For the re... | 2020-06-08T18:55:57 | 2020-06-08T18:55:57 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 642,004,840 | 1,335 | vue-bot | Hello, thank you for taking time filling this issue!
However, we kindly ask you to use our [Issue Helper](https://new-issue.vuejs.org/?repo=vuejs/vue-next) when creating new issues, in order to ensure every issue provides the necessary information for us to investigate. This explains why your issue has been automatic... | 2020-06-10T13:22:00 | 2020-06-10T13:22:00 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 642,253,588 | 1,303 | yyx990803 | This is required for hydration to properly/efficiently pickup the boundaries of fragments. | 2020-06-10T20:56:12 | 2020-06-10T20:56:20 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 637,496,356 | 1,281 | underfin | The optimization happend when node count and props count reach the dafalut threshold value.Thi is why first case is diffrent of the second. And The optimization is not support for runtime compiler on now.
For the case `let cards = this.$slots.default.map((slot) => h(Card, [slot]))`, you still can do it with v2.
For t... | 2020-06-02T12:04:02 | 2020-06-02T12:04:02 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 637,580,794 | 1,281 | sneppy | > you still can do it with v2
You mean, I can do it with Vue 2.x? Because, of course If i simply do this in Vue 3:
```javascript
let cards = slots.default().map((slot) => h(Card, [slot]))
```
I end up with a single `Card` component which contains the three `div`s, which is not what I want.
> maybe you can... | 2020-06-02T14:30:48 | 2020-06-02T14:30:48 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 638,043,660 | 1,239 | dependabot-preview[bot] | Superseded by #1288. | 2020-06-03T08:25:23 | 2020-06-03T08:25:23 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 639,310,918 | 1,284 | allowing | The situation is not optimistic, today found iOS 12.4 is not compatible | 2020-06-05T07:33:34 | 2020-06-05T07:33:34 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 640,380,279 | 1,311 | tangjinzhou | Sorry. I closed this issue. In fact, the [jsx](https://github.com/vueComponent/jsx) I used should be the problem of the jsx plugin. | 2020-06-08T05:36:38 | 2020-06-08T05:37:24 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 640,816,745 | 1,304 | shortpoet | I think I have managed to isolate the bug a bit. The error disappeared again. I realized that it happens when I place the parent component that hold a nested dynamic import at the root of a template. When I nest the parent component even in one 'div', it works with no error. | 2020-06-08T19:09:08 | 2020-06-08T19:09:08 | {} | NONE |
vuejs | core | 641,039,559 | 1,324 | zhangzhonghe | Should be like this
```TypeScript
export function useMappedRef<T, MT>(
original: Ref<T>,
fn: (newVal: T) => MT
) {
const mapped: Ref<UnwrapRef<MT>> = ref(fn(original.value));
}
``` | 2020-06-09T05:34:50 | 2020-06-09T05:34:50 | {} | MEMBER |
vuejs | core | 641,123,895 | 1,326 | vue-bot | Hello, thank you for taking time filling this issue!
However, we kindly ask you to use our [Issue Helper](https://new-issue.vuejs.org/?repo=vuejs/vue-next) when creating new issues, in order to ensure every issue provides the necessary information for us to investigate. This explains why your issue has been automatic... | 2020-06-09T08:32:04 | 2020-06-09T08:32:04 | {} | CONTRIBUTOR |
vuejs | core | 641,341,942 | 1,324 | dodas | Thank you both.
@zhangzhonghe: using your suggestion, I would still need to cast every time I assign to `mapped.value`.
@pikax: that works.
However, is that how it's supposed to work? Can it be improved?
I migrated from @vue/composition-api 0.4.0 where this used to work without casting or explicit `UnwrapRef`... | 2020-06-09T14:40:51 | 2020-06-09T14:46:26 | {} | NONE |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.