prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: Liquidatable positions can be unwound by the owner of the position
### Description
The liquidation function can be front-runned since it does not require any deposits. In particular, the liquidation function can be front-runned by the owner of the position by calling `unwind`. This effectively means that users... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | false | false | ## Medium: Some protection buyers might not be able to renew their protections due to delayed expiration processing.
### Description
Some protection buyers will never be able to renew their protection due to delayed expiration processing.
### Impact
Some protection buyers might never be able to renew their protectio... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: `LinearDistributor.decrementRewards()`: declaredBalance should get cached
### Description
See @audit tag | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | false | false | ## Low: Contracts should inherit their interfaces
### Description
Contract implementations should inherit their interfaces. Extending an interface ensures that all function signatures are correct, and catches mistakes introduced (e.g. through errant keystrokes)
### Proof of Concept
#### Marketplace.sol
[contract M... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Presence Of Useless Loop
### Description
## Redundancy Issue in `execute_admin_operation` Implementation
The current implementation of `execute_admin_operation` in `maven.move` contains a redundancy issue. The first while loop stores approved operations in the `operations` vector, while the second loop iterat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lines are too long
### Description
Usually lines in source code are limited to [80](https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/148677/why-is-80-characters-the-standard-limit-for-code-width) characters. Today's screens are much larger so it's reasonable to stretch this in some cases. Since the file... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | logic | false | false | ## High: Contract owners can change business logic unnoticeably
### Description
In several contracts, the owner can arbitrarily change the business logic by setting new contract addresses, without properly warning users of those changes. Examples are:
* [`RenderToken#setEscrowContractAddress`](https://github.com/jeu... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | liquidation | false | false | ## Gas: No amountCollateral > balance check
### Description
No `amountCollateral` > balance check
### Impact
The transaction will fail is the user inputs an `amountCollateral` > to his balance. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Solidity version update
### Description
**Description**
The solidity version should be updated. Issue is classified as Medium, because it is included to
the list of standard smart contracts’ vulnerabilities. Currently used version (0.7.5) is considered
obsolete, which contradicts the standard checklist.
*... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: AdminControlled.solLacking Admin Transfer Pattern
### Description
The `AdminControlled.sol` contract utilises the `adminSstore()` function to update certain state variables within contracts inheriting `AdminControlled.sol`. However, it is possible that the `onlyAdmin` role may be unintentionally set to the wro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Lack of zero-value checks on functions Status: Unresolved
### Description
The `ClearingHouseCallee` contract's `setClearingHouse` function and the `OrderBook` contract's `setExchange` function fail to validate some of their incoming arguments, so callers can accidentally set important state variables to the ze... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | front-running | true | false | ## Low: There is no slippage protection when purchasing packets
### Description
_Resolved_
In `PacketStore.sol` the contract allows users to buy packets at a certain price.
This price is set by the price manager, however the problem occurs when a user is buying a packet while the manager is changing the price for t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: Events not emitted for failed tryExecute attempts
### Description
When calling `excecute()` with `EXECTYPE_TRY` and either `CALLTYPE_SINGLE` or `CALLTYPE_DELEGATE-CALL`, no event is emitted if the try fails. Whereas with `CALLTYPE_BATCH`, the `TryExecuteUnsuccessful` event is emitted for each failure. In `exec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary path prefix.
### Description
**Description**
The code uses the following constructions:
anchor_lang::solana_program::program::invoke , while the `anchor_lang is already imported, so it can be omitted.
File: lending/programs/water/src/lib.rs: 399,425,430
**Recommendation**
omit anchor_lang` in th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Usage of block.timestamp
### Description
The contract uses `block.timestamp`. The global variable `block.timestamp` does not necessarily hold the current time, and may not be accurate. Miners can influence the value of block.timestamp to perform Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) attacks. There is no guarantee th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: [11] Variable names that consist of all capital letters should be reserved for `const`/`immutable` variables
### Description
If the variable needs to be different based on which class it comes from, a `view`/`pure` *function* should be used instead (e.g. like [this](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `DistributionManagerSetup::canDistribute` should return false rather than reverting
### Description
`DistributionManagerSetup::canDistribute` currently returns true if distribution can proceed but reverts from within `_validateCanDistribute()` if it cannot:
```solidity
function canDistribute() public view... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | token | true | true | ## High: `AllocationVesting` contract can be exploited for infinite points via self-transfer
### Description
The `AllocationVesting` contract gives points on vesting schedules to team members, investors, influencers and anyone else entitled to a token allocation.
`AllocationVesting::transferPoints` allows users to tr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Missing check for polFeeCollector initialization
### Description
Severity: Low Risk
Context: ProtocolFeesCollector.sol#L98
Description: The withdrawCollectedFeesToPOLFeeCollector() function allows to withdraw fees to the
polFeeCollector address. The constructor does not set this address to keep the changes as ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | false | false | ## Medium: New 0x transformers are allowed by default, which could lead to unexpected problems
### Description
When the controller checks `canCall()` for calls to the 0x contract, it begins by checking that `sig == 0x415565b0`.
If this check fails (ie if any other function is called), the call is not allowed. However... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Lack of two-step ownership transfer pattern
### Description
The following contracts implements the Ownable pattern:
* `AuthorTokenFactory`
* `PaymentCollector`
* `SubscribeRegistry`
* `ALTT`
However, the assessment revealed that the solution does not support the two-step-ownership-transfer pattern. The owner... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: moveStrategy runs of out gas for large inputs
### Description
Reordering strategies can trigger operations that will run out-of-gas before completion. A GVault contract allows different strategies to be added into a queue. Since the order of them is important, the contract provides `moveStrategy`, a function t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: DEPOSIT FUNCTION CAN BE IMPERSONATED
### Description
During the execution of `deposit`, the main logic is delegated to an internal function named `_deposit`. This function makes use of the parameter `_user` to define the address which executed the deposit. Since this function does not verify which account is e... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: VULNERABLE THIRD-PARTY DEPENDENCIES
### Description
The scoped repositories used multiple third-party dependencies. Using vulnerable third-party libraries may result in security vulnerabilities in the project that can be exploited by attackers. This could result in data breaches, theft of sensitive informat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Potentially re-entrancy weak code
### Description
At the lines: https://github.com/1inch/fee-collector/blob/3c2626763fd829500496f15476d5e98fbdf4f574/contracts/FeeCollector.sol#L339-L342
the state changes inside `_updateReward` which happens AFTER:
- `erc20.safeTransferFrom()`
It makes the method potentially we... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Redemptions during undercollateralization can be hot-swapped to steal all funds
### Description
During recollateralization/a switch basket/when the protocol collateral isn't sound, a user can have almost their entire redemption transaction hot swapped for nothing.
For example, trying to redeem 1M collatera... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Initialize function in L2GraphToken.sol, BridgeEscrow.sol, L2GraphTokenGateway.sol, L1GraphTokenGateway.sol can be invoked multiple times from the implementation contract
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-10-thegraph/blob/309a188f7215fa42c745b136357702400f91b4ff/contracts/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Attackers can prevent users creating an offer by frontrunning
### Description
**Description:** The protocol allows anyone to create offers with an offer ID provided by the user. While this design gives users the flexibility to choose their offer ID, it also introduces a problem.
The `createOffer` function ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Cross-chain deposit messages can be sent to the same chain
### Description
The `crossChainBuy()` function doesn't validate that the cross-chain deposit isn't sent to the same chain. This might be used to attempt to avoid cross-chain deposit fee multipliers since `ccDetails[_daoAddress]` is empty for the source... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Limited e�fectiveness of the transaction parser fuzz target
### Description
The following issues limit the effectiveness of the existing fuzz target for the transaction parser:
1. The `run-fuzzers.py` and `run-fuzz-crashes.py` scripts are duplicated in the source tree, with nonfunctional versions in the root ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: EpochParticipation.UnmarshalJSON may parse invalid data
### Description
The `EpochParticipation.UnmarshalJSON` function used to deserialize a JSON byte slice does not validate the format of the provided JSON string, assuming that it starts and ends with quotation marks, which may not be true.
For example, un... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Decimals | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-08-sentiment-judging/tree/main/026-H
## Found by
Lambda, WATCHPUG, 0x52, hyh
## Summary
When one of the LP token's underlying tokens `decimals` is not 18, the price of the LP token calculated by `UniV2LPOracle` will be wrong.
## Vulnerability Detail
`UniV2LPOracle` ... | Sherlock | 4 | Sentiment |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Invalid address check uses assert
### Description
The `relay` function of the `Marmo` contract [fails when the signer is the invalid address](https://github.com/ripio/marmo-contracts/blob/d3fb5922a4f01e47d585343d08cccfad659b3584/contracts/Marmo.sol#L103). This failure is executed with the `assert` function, so... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: DAO creators can avoid paying creation fees
### Description
Both `createERC20DAO()` and `createERC721DAO()` verify that enough native tokens were sent as fees via `checkCreateFeesSent()`:
```solidity
function checkCreateFeesSent(uint256[] calldata _depositChainIds) internal returns (uint256) {
uint256 fees... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: `_increaseBalance()` mints fewer shares than expected
### Description
To increase the balance of a node owner, the `NativeVault._increaseBalance` function is called. This function increases the total assets, calculates the shares to be minted, mints the shares for the node owner, and updates the `totalRestake... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Same credentials used for staging, test, and production environment databases
### Description
The staging, test, and production environments' databases have the same username and password credentials. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Mismatch in actual pool's liquidity and pool node's liquidity infomation because of wrong `route` in `PoolWalker.settle`
### Description
When `WalkerLib.modify` updates a pool’s nodes' information, the protocol subsequently calls `PoolWalker.settle` to update the actual pool state.
However, `PoolWalker.settl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: BaseAsyncSwap Operation Is Unclear
### Description
The [`BaseAsyncSwap` hook](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/uniswap-hooks/blob/f051c147dbf296b2b854de92970905a880cd1d51/src/base/BaseNoOp.sol#L27) skips any swap actions in the Uniswap pool by [minting](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/uniswap-hooks/blob/f051... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Staking amount in QI should be calculated differently
### Description
**Description:** Currently, if the stake token is `QI`, `stakingAmountInQi` is [calculated](https://code.zeeve.net/zeeve-endeavors/benqi_smartcontract/-/blob/b63336201f50f9a67451bf5c7b32ddcc4a847ce2/contracts/staking.sol#L542-544) as shown b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect accounting for the burned gEth
### Description
Geode Portal records the amount of minted and burned gETH on any given day during the active period of the oracle. One case where some gETH is burned is when the users redeem gETH for ETH. In the burn function we burn the `spentGeth - gEthDonation` but i... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Use memory instead of storage in `createChapters()` function
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Resolved
**Location**: AirdropFactory.sol
**Description**
In `createChapters()`, storage has been used instead of memory for reading values from `AirdropList`. The usage of storage is not needed as th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | true | false | ## Medium: Bio lines will overflow the buffer for repeated "continuation" characters
### Description
The Bio `tokenURI` function splits biography text into lines. The algorithm will take into account certain "continuation" characters to prevent splitting the line in the middle of these characters and keep accumulating... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | flash-loan | false | false | ## Low: Callbacks that require return data are not supported
### Description
## Vulnerability Report
## Severity:
**Low Risk**
## Context:
`CallbackHandler.sol#L51-L67`
## Description:
Callbacks to the vault do not return any data, which means callbacks that expect a return value are not supported. This could li... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: findMarketFor() missing check minAmountOut_
### Description
BondAggregator#findMarketFor() minAmountOut_ does not actually take effect，may return a market's "payout" smaller than minAmountOut_ , Causes users to waste gas calls to purchase
### Impact
The user gets the optimal market through BondAggregator#f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Dust amounts not compensated, even if not using price oracle
### Description
If there's a fixed weighting between what the user provides, and what is minted for them, there should be code that tracks partial token amounts, so that later payments are compensated for their prior partial amounts.
*There is 1 ins... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Unnecessary double `if` condition in `_swap` and `_lpTokenSpecified`
### Description
Function `_swap` checks `specifiedToken == SpecifiedToken.X` condition twice: firstly in line 529, then in line 547. There are no additional operations within those two `if` blocks, thus, the result of `specifiedToken == Speci... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | liquidation | false | false | ## Gas: 3S-LENFT-N04 libraries/logic /LiquidationLogic.sol: entire loan struct is being needlessly loaded
### Description
In function `bidLiquidationAuction()` of the [LiquidationLogic](https://github.com/leNFT/contracts/blob/master/contracts/libraries/logic/LiquidationLogic.sol#L71), the entire loan struct is being l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: [Not-in-Scope] Avoid Changing Eigenlayer-Middleware Contracts Directly Acknowledged
### Description
The Aligned team has indicated that they rely on eigenlayer\-middleware patches to implement whitelisting features in the Registry Coordinator. The team provided a [draft patch](https://github.com/Layr-Labs/... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | overflow | false | false | ## Gas: Unchecking arithmetics operations that can't underflow/overflow
### Description
While this is inside an `external view` function, consider wrapping this in an `unchecked` statement so that external contracts calling this might save some gas:
* [L245 can be unchecked due to L240](https://github.com/JustDravee... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: `MIN_SPEED` and `DEFAULT_MIN_SPEED` should be merged into a shared constants library
### Description
The `DistributionManager`, `BenqiCoreModule`, and `BenqiEcosystemModule` contracts each independently define a constant for the minimum reward speed, `DEFAULT_MIN_SPEED` and `MIN_SPEED` respectively. Although t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Typos in descriptions
### Description
Several typos:
1. 'occured' instead of 'occurred'
https://github.com/ibdotxyz/compound-protocol/blob/8cd45803b48552e344e22be280c9e1c03ec8644a/contracts/CTokenInterfaces.sol#L366
https://github.com/ibdotxyz/compound-protocol/blob/8cd45803b48552e344e22be280c9e1c03ec8644a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | false | false | ## Low: Using `send()` for ETH may Fail in the Future
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> No action taken
**File(s) affected:**`wstTAO.sol`
**Description:** The functions `address.transfer()` and `address.send()` assume a fixed amount o... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | Access Control | true | false | ## Security Vulnerability Report
## Severity
**High Risk**
## Context
`VaultImplementation.sol#L225`
## Description
In the `_validateCommitment()` function, the initial checks are intended to ensure that the caller who is requesting the lien is someone who should have access to the collateral that it's being taken o... | Spearbit | 5 | Astaria |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | signature | true | false | ## Low: [14] Mismanagement of transaction nonce in parallel processing
### Description
The `ETHScanner` class handles the processing of Ethereum transactions, including sending new transactions based on block events. However, the class does not adequately manage the nonce—a counter used to ensure each transaction from... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | true | false | ## High: getOwedFee can incorrectly return zero because of fee growth underflow
### Description
Although function `getFeeGrowthInside` correctly accounts for Uniswap V3's principled use of underflow to calculate `feeGrowthInside[0/1]X128`, function `getOwedFee` will incorrectly return zero for `token[0/1]Owed` in the f... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [01] Use an efficient logic in setter functions
### Description
When intending to emit both the old and new values, there isn't a need to cache the old value that will only be used once. Simply emit both values before assigning a new value to the state variable. For example, the following setter function may b... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | flash-loan | true | false | ## Medium: The buy function’s mechanism enables users to acquire flash loans at a cheaper fee rate.
### Description
## Lines of code
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-04-caviar/blob/main/src/PrivatePool.sol#L211-L289
https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-04-caviar/blob/main/src/PrivatePool.sol#L240
## Vulnerability d... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | reentrancy | false | false | ## High: TokenDistributor: ERC777 tokensToSend hook can be exploited to drain contract
### Description
_Submitted by Lambda_
### Impact
`TokenDistributor.createERC20Distribution` can be used to create token distributions for ERC777 tokens (which are backwards-compatible with ERC20). However, this introduces a reent... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | high | rounding | true | true |
In the `_getAvailable()` function, the calculation performs division before multiplication, which could result in precision loss. The consequence is that users may not be able to withdraw the amount they should receive, leaving some funds locked in the `WithdrawalQueue`.
```solidity
// @audit division before multipli... | Code4rena | 5 | Gondi |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | true | false | ## Low: Best to assert oracle decimals in constructor
### Description
**Impact**
https://github.com/liquity/bold/blob/a34960222df5061fa7c0213df5d20626adf3ecc4/contracts/src/PriceFeeds/CompositePriceFeed.sol#L34-L36
Chainlink price feeds tend to have either 8 or 18 decimals
As to ensure that the decimals are the in... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | signature | true | true | ## Medium: Don't add duplicate `documentHash` to `DocumentManager::DocumentStorage::_docHashes` when overwriting via `_setDocument` as this causes panic revert when calling `_removeDocument`
### Description
`DocumentManager::_setDocument` intentionally allows overwriting but when overwriting it adds an additional dupl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: The LP pair underlying price quote could be manipulated
### Description
_Submitted by __141345___
The underlying price for LP pool pair can be manipulated. This kind of price mainpulation happened before, can be found here: [Warp Fincance event](https://rekt.news/warp-finance-rekt/).
Which ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: LootBox - executeCalls can be misused to relay calls
### Description
`LootBox` is deployed with `LootBoxController` and serves as the implementation for individual `create2` lootbox proxy contracts. None of the methods of the `LootBox` implementation contract are access restricted. A malicious actor may theref... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Shadowed function names
### Description
The `LpWrapper` constructor includes the parameters `name` and `symbol`, which are used to provide to the inherited `ERC20` contract constructor.
```solidity
constructor(
ICore core_,
IAmmDepositWithdrawModule ammDepositWithdrawModule_,
string memory name,
strin... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Unused event
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The ERC20Vesting.sol contract declares the IncreaseLiquidity event but the vent is not used in the contract.
**Recommendation**:
Remove the unused event. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: `WrappedVaultShare` constructor misassigns ROUTER
### Description
`WrappedVaultShare` misassigns the constructor argument to itself instead of the immutable state variable,
As a result, the code fails to compile.
Recommendation:
change to:
`ROUTER = router;` | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | true | ## Low: Stale Issuance Records After `Burn` and `Seize` Operations
### Description
The `recordBurn()` and `recordSeize()` functions in `ComplianceServiceRegulated.sol` do not clean up issuance records when tokens are burned or seized. This causes stale issuance records to persist in the system, which can lead to incor... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Contracts using the experimental ABIEncoderV2
### Description
The Solo project uses features from the ABIEncoderV2 of Solidity. This new version of the encoder is still experimental. Since the release of Solidity v0.5.4 (the one used by the Solo project), two new versions of Solidity have been released fixing... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Asymmetry enforcement between `TokenIssuer::registerInvestor`, `WalletRegistrar::registerWallet` and `SecuritizeSwap::_registerNewInvestor`
### Description
**Description:** In `TokenIssuer::registerInvestor`, if the user isn't already an investor they get registered and must have 3 specific attributes set:
B... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Place the statement inside the unchecked section
### Description
**Description**
At
contracts/UnoERC20.sol:261
You can place the statement one line above to the unchecked section.
**Recommendation**:
Save gas, place the statement unchecked. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: CREATE3 is not available in the zkSync Era.
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2023-09-Gitcoin-judging/issues/862
## Found by
0xc0ffEE, 0xnirlin, carrotsmuggler, imsrybr0, jkoppel, pengun
## Vulnerability Detail
According to the contest README, the project can be deployed in zkSyn... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [04] Typos
### Description
**Issue Description:**
Comments for `ptRate` and `ibtRate` contains unnecessary ‘or’ which can be removed:
[PrincipalToken.sol#L55-L56](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-02-spectra/blob/main/src/tokens/PrincipalToken.sol#L55-L56)
**Recommendation:**
Modify the comments by remov... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused `isDNftOwner` can be removed
### Description
Since the `isDNftOwner` modifier has been replaced with the `_authorizeCall` check. This modifier can be removed as it is unused. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Known Issues
### Description
The testing team has identified four (4) issues that have been previously flagged by the TracerDAO team. These include:
- Safe Governance Transfer
- Keeper Rewards
- Keeper Gas Price Usage
- New Keeper Propagation | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Fee refund can lose precision
### Description
`PledgeManager::refundTokens` calculates the user fee refund as:
```solidity
fee = (userPay.fee / userPay.tokensBought) * numTokens;
```
### Impact
The fee refund will be less than it should be due to [division before multiplication](https://dacian.me/precision-lo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `zroPaymentAddress` should not be hardcoded to `address(0)`
### Description
The [LayerZero integration checklist](https://layerzero.gitbook.io/docs/troubleshooting/layerzero-integration-checklist) says:
> "Do not hardcode address zero (`address(0)`) as `zroPaymentAddress` when estimating fees and sending mess... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unneeded named return parameter ✓ Fixed
### Description
#### Resolution
Fixed in [OrchidProtocol/[email protected]`21d56d5`](https://github.com/OrchidProtocol/orchid/commit/21d56d5fc33cbba6838447231a575fee54f3aad7)
**Description**
In the `heft` function in the `OrchidDirectory` contract, there is an unus... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Significant Gas Overhead Using `ERC721Enumerable`
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `b64dbbc578c64cc2699c65e2fa91947a9f585be2`. The client provided the following explanation:
> changed from ERC721EnumerableUpgradeable to ERC721Upgradeable. Deleted function tokensOfOwner... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: [03] Doc fix
### Description
The docs state that clearing happens after execution, but the endpoint clears before creating the call.
* In [messaging\_composer.move](https://github.com/code-423n4/2025-09-layerzero/blob/c7073f1c39a6bf319d28c8ccfd353f2fea6f552f/contracts/endpoint-v2/sources/internal/messaging_co... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | signature | true | false | ## Medium: A removal signature might be applied to the wrong `fid`.
### Description
**Severity:** Medium
**Description:** A remove signature is used to remove a key from `fidOwner` using `KeyRegistry.removeFor()`. And the signature is verified in `_verifyRemoveSig()`.
But the signature doesn't specify a `fid` to re... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Not using the named return variables anywhere in the function is confusing
### Description
Consider changing the variable to be an unnamed one
*There are 2 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-backd/blob/2a5664d35cde5b036074edef3c1369b984d10010/protocol/contracts/tokenomics/FeeBurn... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: `placeMagnet` does not check if the planet is owned by the empire
### Description
The `placeMagnet` function in `OverrideMagnetsSystem.sol` adds a magnet to a planet, which influences the ship's movement. To place a magnet players have to lock points to prevent them from moving enemy ships away from their h... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | input-validation | true | false | ## Low: Unnecessary validation of `EnumerableSet` functions
### Description
When invoking `EnumerableSet::add` and `EnumerableSet::remove`, it is not necessary to first check whether an element [already exists](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/2f0bc58946db746c0d17a2b9d9a8e13f5a8edd7f/contrac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | storage | true | false | ## Low: [15] `PartyGovernance` and `ProposalExecutionEngine` inherit from the same parents in different order
### Description
`PartyGovernance` and `ProposalExecutionEngine` inherit both from `Implementation` and `ProposalStorage`.
However, these two parents are inherited in a different order:
This does not current... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: limit DoS via unbounded operations
### Description
Only one attack will lead to two types of vulnerabilities in `UserManager.sol` and `UToken.sol`
### Impact
1- The user couldn’t get any more `vouching`
2- The user will be not able to `borrow()` or `repayBorrow()`
3- No one can in invoke`registerMember()`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: DoSing the launch finalization process
### Description
The `UniswapV3Pool.initialize()` function can be called before the launch is complete, potentially causing a denial of service (DOS) in the finalization process.
### Recommendation
Initialize the pool during its creation. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | token | false | false | **Details**
[Morpho.sol#L483-L509](https://github.com/morpho-org/morpho-blue/blob/eb65770e12c4cdae5836c0027e35b9c82794c3eb/src/Morpho.sol#L483-L509)
function _accrueInterest(MarketParams memory marketParams, Id id) internal {
uint256 elapsed = block.timestamp - market[id].lastUpdate;
i... | 0x52 | 5 | Hyperstable |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: Lack of consideration of time in ensureNoMEV leads to unexpected reverts
### Description
`VeloOracle.ensureNoMEV` works by looking back at a given amount of observations and reverting if the tick delta between observations exceeds a `maxAllowedDelta`. The observations are retrieved from the given `CLPool` w... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Unusable `retrieve721()` function because contract can not receive ERC721 tokens.
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**:
The function `retrieve721()` is used to transfer a ERC721 token from the contract itself to the caller but the contract is not ERC721Receiver s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: Lack of address validation in setExecutor
### Description
In the `EmergencyProposal` contract, the function [`setExecutor`](https://github.com/UMAprotocol/protocol/blob/5682c65a9226f63610a6eb391c34d06799eb587d/packages/core/contracts/oracle/implementation/EmergencyProposer.sol#L214) allows the owner of the con... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Incompatibility with non-standard ERC20 tokens
### Description
The `RequesterAuthorizerWhitelisterWithTokenPayment` and `RequesterAuthorizerWhitelisterWithTokenDeposit` contracts are meant to work with any ERC20 token. However, several high-profile ERC20 tokens do not correctly implement the ERC20 standard. Th... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: App does not restrict the use of unencrypted HTTP
### Description
Magma has not enabled Android N's Network Security Configuration feature, which forces the use of encryption (HTTPS) for all the app's connections. Cleartext HTTP traffic is not blocked, and it cannot be ensured that all data sent by Magma is... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Curve Cryptopool `donate()` Function Is Poorly Defined
### Description
**Update**
The client acknowledged the issue and provided the following explanation:
> min_amount is minimal amount of LP token which could have been minted in the donation (since donation is not symmetric). This will be rechecked once Cur... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: Lost fees due to precision loss in fees calculation
### Description
_Submitted by kenzo, also found by 0v3rf10w_
In fees calculation, division is being used in the midst of the calculation, not at the end of it.
This leads to lost precision in fee amount (as solidity doesn't save remainder of division).
Di... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | reentrancy | false | false | ## Medium: Use call instead of transfer
### Description
In both of the withdraw functions, `transfer()` is used for native ETH withdrawal.
The transfer() and send() functions forward a fixed amount of 2300 gas. Historically, it has often been recommended to use these functions for value transfers to guard against reen... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: `IF’s/require()` statements that check input arguments should be at the `top` of the function
### Description
Saves `300 GAS` in `2 instances.
Checks that involve constants should come before checks that involve state variables, function calls, and calculations. By doing these checks first, the function is ab... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: SendDataWithRetry doesn't work properly(Retries will not happen)
### Description
Cosmos's `BroadcastTx` returns an error in the first argument instead of the second one.
### Impact
Retries will not happen, error will be passed
### Recommendation
Copy how its done in sei
```go
grpcRes, err := TX_CLIENT.B... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | front-running | false | false | The ERC-20 standard [`approve`](https://github.com/notional-finance/contracts-v2/blob/c37c89c9729b830637558a09b6f22fc6a735da64/contracts/external/governance/NoteERC20.sol#L110-L129) function lets `NOTE` owners specify a `spender` that may transfer up to `rawAmount` tokens from the owner’s balance.
The same `approve`... | OpenZeppelin | 4 | Notional Governance Contracts v2 Audit |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Incorrect initial deposit calculation may cause cancelProgram to revert
### Description
The `FluidEPProgramManager.cancelProgram()` function incorrectly assumes that governance parameters (minimum deposit and liquidation period) remain constant throughout a program's lifecycle. When these parameters change ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: TRST-L-4 It’s possible to artificially increase the supply variable in Ve.sol
### Description
**Description:**
The function `merge()`, which is used to merge two different veSatin into one, internally calls
`_depositFor()` which as part of its execution increases the variable **supply**, responsible for
trac... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.