context stringlengths 545 71.9k | questionsrc stringlengths 16 10.2k | question stringlengths 11 563 |
|---|---|---|
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | is n't the force applied for the kinetic friction supposed to be down to 70.6n because the other 29.4n were already used to overcome the static friction ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | how to find frictional force if we have kinetic friction , static friction and 2 forces ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | so the first thing you might realize is if there is no friction if this was a completely frictionless boundary and there is no air resistance , we are assuming that there is no air resistance in this example that in this dimension , in the horizontal dimension there would only be one force here , this 100 n force it wo... | if a horizontal force of 8n applied to the block through its centre of mass just slides the block on the platform , then the coefficient of limiting friction between the block and the platform is ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | so the first thing you might realize is if there is no friction if this was a completely frictionless boundary and there is no air resistance , we are assuming that there is no air resistance in this example that in this dimension , in the horizontal dimension there would only be one force here , this 100 n force it wo... | if in the same problem , your just told that a horizontal force is applied to the block and slowly increased until the block starts to slide after which the force remains constant how would you do the following : 1. determine the value of applied horizontal force the instant before the block starts to slide 2. the net ... |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | we have 100 n to the right ; we have 26.95 to the left 100 minus 26.95 100 n that i 'm applying to the right - 26.95 n which is the force of friction to the left always acting against us means that there 's a net force to the right of 73.05 so once we 're moving , we have a net force to the right of 73.05 n this is the... | what is the name of the numerical difference between static and kinetic friction coefficients ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | how to solve problems related to wedge constrains ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | i can draw them whatever , but remember this is acting on the object if we want to be precise , we can show it on the center of mass because we can view all of these atoms as one collective object but anyway , what is the net force now ? we have 100 n to the right ; we have 26.95 to the left 100 minus 26.95 100 n that ... | so basically , what i am getting from this is that when the block just begins to budge , we are applying a net force of 70.6n with acceleratiom of 14.1m/s^2 , and just after the block budged the net force increased to 73.05n with 14.61 acceleration ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | if there is friction , should n't the acceleration have a negative value ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | we have 100 n to the right ; we have 26.95 to the left 100 minus 26.95 100 n that i 'm applying to the right - 26.95 n which is the force of friction to the left always acting against us means that there 's a net force to the right of 73.05 so once we 're moving , we have a net force to the right of 73.05 n this is the... | how can the velocity raise if there 's friction ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | if the force and acceleration change from the `` moment '' of overcoming static friction , to a higher force and acceleration due to the lessened force of kinetic friction , how can you state that acceleration from a stop for a change in time is `` constant '' ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | so the first thing you might realize is if there is no friction if this was a completely frictionless boundary and there is no air resistance , we are assuming that there is no air resistance in this example that in this dimension , in the horizontal dimension there would only be one force here , this 100 n force it wo... | how do you find the budging force with only the given information ( force of gravity , applied force , and the weight of the block ) ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | we have 100 n to the right ; we have 26.95 to the left 100 minus 26.95 100 n that i 'm applying to the right - 26.95 n which is the force of friction to the left always acting against us means that there 's a net force to the right of 73.05 so once we 're moving , we have a net force to the right of 73.05 n this is the... | why does static friction have an acceleration ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | so we can start using the coefficient of kinetic friction it 's the ratio between that and the magnitude of the force of contact between this block and the floor or ground here and the magnitude of that force of contact is the same thing as the normal force that the ground is applying on the block the magnitude of the ... | first : how long is that moment ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | second : what kind of coefficient would you have if your surfaces had grooves ? |
so i have got this block of wood here that has a mass of 5 kilograms and it is sitting on some dirt and we are near the surface of the earth and the coefficient of static friction between this type of wood and this type of dirt is 0.60 and the coefficient of kinetic friction between this type of wood and this type of d... | so i have 100 n going that way and i have 26.95 going that way remember , with vectors , i do n't have to draw them here i can draw all of their tails start at the center of mass of the object . i can draw them whatever , but remember this is acting on the object if we want to be precise , we can show it on the center ... | how would you make an object stop if the object is exerting kinetic friction ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | so now based on this , and i think this is what vicksoma might have been hinting at , you say , look , ok , it 's earlier in our orbit . would n't this now be november ? and the answer is no . | would n't that mean that each hemisphere would see some stars they did n't see before , and that the stars would be visible at different times of the night than at the original position ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | let me draw the sun right over here . and let me draw earth 's orbit around the sun . and i 'm going to draw it with some eccentricity . | at about 0 in this lesson is sal saying that a year is not based on the time it takes for the earth to orbit the sun , but the time it takes the for one precession orbit ( the period from one perihelion to the next ) to occur ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | obviously , i 'm exaggerating , though , the eccentricity here . so let 's say that 's earth 's orbit . this is the point where we are closest , so that 's perihelion . | so , say relative to some galactic reference , does n't the orbit of earth ( and other planets ) change over time as well ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | it actually occurs a few weeks before the perihelion . so when we are most tilted to the sun , this is our winter solstice . and this is when we are -- actually , in the case of the northern hemisphere , this is when we are most tilted away from the sun , i should say . | why does the summer solstice always have to be constant on dec 21 - 22 ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | and we saw in the first video when we discussed this that right now this perihelion is occurring in january , and this will change over time as we 'll see in this video . so january right now , and aphelion right now occurs in july . now , the time where we are most tilted towards the sun is not at the perihelion right... | so , if earth is moving away from perihelion right now does it mean that in few thousand years dec 21st would be when earth is at aphelion ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | there 's multiple types of precession we will talk about . if someone says just precession they 're usually referring to axial precession . it 's this idea that over 26,000 years , the tip of this arrow , or you could even imagine the poles themselves , will trace out a circle . | also after one axial precession cycle we would lost one orbital year ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | it 's not , it tilts , and this angle right over here is 23.4 degrees . and when i say straight up and down , i 'm saying relative to the plane of earth 's orbit around the sun . so this right here is the obliquity . | 0 , is the plane of our orbit perfectly flat ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | this will still be december 21st or 22nd depending on the year . still be the same date , and that 's because our calendar is based on when we are most tilted away or when we are most tilted towards the sun . so by definition , this is when we are most tilted away so this will be the winter solstice . | then why was the calendar made so that it 's dec 22 when the earth is most tilted away from the sun ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | our calendar is based on the maximum tilt towards or away from the sun , and that , as we see , that is slightly changing in terms of where it occurs in the absolute point in space . i think it 's changing by roughly 20 minutes a year . so every year , the perihelion is getting 20 minutes later . if we wanted to use th... | so what causes the magnetic north & south poles to wander around and be different from year to year ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | i 'm going to assume -- let me make that a little bit more curved -- this is the rotation of the earth , it is in this direction right over here . and what we learned about precession -- and actually , to be particular , it 's axial precession . there 's multiple types of precession we will talk about . if someone says... | what is the precession of the perihelion and what are its side effects ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | there 's multiple types of precession we will talk about . if someone says just precession they 're usually referring to axial precession . it 's this idea that over 26,000 years , the tip of this arrow , or you could even imagine the poles themselves , will trace out a circle . | is the axial precession in the opposite direction to the rotation of the earth ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | and the answer is no . it will still be december 22nd . this will still be december 21st or 22nd depending on the year . | in 21600 years , will the earth be 12 months behind still on december 22 ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | i 'm going to assume -- let me make that a little bit more curved -- this is the rotation of the earth , it is in this direction right over here . and what we learned about precession -- and actually , to be particular , it 's axial precession . there 's multiple types of precession we will talk about . if someone says... | how is the precession mentioned in these videos different from the precession of the equinoxes ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | let me draw the sun right over here . and let me draw earth 's orbit around the sun . and i 'm going to draw it with some eccentricity . | on the example of a spinning top and the wobble that is occurring around the axis , as we have all seen the spinning top lose speed and the wobble increases , is the same happening for the earth , of course over many thousands of years ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | but it never becomes this dramatic , but this will help us visualize it . so earth 's orbit might look something like this . earth 's orbit -- let me make it , i can do a better job than that -- earth 's orbit might look something like this . obviously , i 'm exaggerating , though , the eccentricity here . | when the season comes and when the earth tilts how much speed based on it 's position ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | our calendar is based on the maximum tilt towards or away from the sun , and that , as we see , that is slightly changing in terms of where it occurs in the absolute point in space . i think it 's changing by roughly 20 minutes a year . so every year , the perihelion is getting 20 minutes later . if we wanted to use th... | so , the tropical year ( same as our calendar based on seasons or max/min axial tilt ) is 20 minutes shorter than a sidereal year ( earth 's complete revolution ) , right ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | and this is when we are furthest . this is aphelion . and we saw in the first video when we discussed this that right now this perihelion is occurring in january , and this will change over time as we 'll see in this video . | sound like this is the case , but are the perihelion and aphelion fixed points in space ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | so now if we wait -- or i should say in 1,800 years , it will be most pointed away , or the northern hemisphere will be most pointed away from the sun , about a month earlier . so about a month earlier . it 'll be most pointed away from the sun about a month earlier . | so if the precession causes the tilt to be most tilted away a month earlier , how can it still be december ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | but it never becomes this dramatic , but this will help us visualize it . so earth 's orbit might look something like this . earth 's orbit -- let me make it , i can do a better job than that -- earth 's orbit might look something like this . obviously , i 'm exaggerating , though , the eccentricity here . | how do we know the tilt of earth ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | what is our form of measurement ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | and we saw in the first video when we discussed this that right now this perihelion is occurring in january , and this will change over time as we 'll see in this video . so january right now , and aphelion right now occurs in july . now , the time where we are most tilted towards the sun is not at the perihelion right... | so the solstices are different times from our respective perihelions and aphelions , right ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | let me draw the sun right over here . and let me draw earth 's orbit around the sun . and i 'm going to draw it with some eccentricity . | can someone explain the difference in terms of the earth 's position relative to the sun ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | and what we 're going to see is that the second statement is not true because our calendar is actually based on when we are most tilted away from or towards the sun . so our calendar is actually based on -- is actually to some degree you could say takes precession into account , and what actually does change according ... | how does the calendar change when the tilt of the earth changes ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | so now if we wait -- or i should say in 1,800 years , it will be most pointed away , or the northern hemisphere will be most pointed away from the sun , about a month earlier . so about a month earlier . it 'll be most pointed away from the sun about a month earlier . | bcs if we did n't make any changes to the calendar and kept using this one , how can december be a month earlier ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | and we saw in the first video when we discussed this that right now this perihelion is occurring in january , and this will change over time as we 'll see in this video . so january right now , and aphelion right now occurs in july . now , the time where we are most tilted towards the sun is not at the perihelion right... | the solstice should change its date right ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | it actually occurs a few weeks before the perihelion . so when we are most tilted to the sun , this is our winter solstice . and this is when we are -- actually , in the case of the northern hemisphere , this is when we are most tilted away from the sun , i should say . | why would the perihelion , the point when earth is closest to the sun , be close to the winter solstice , while the aphelion , the point when earth is farthest from the sun , be close to the winter solstice ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | and let me draw earth 's orbit around the sun . and i 'm going to draw it with some eccentricity . and just so you know what i 'm talking about when i say eccentricity , a circle has no eccentricity . an ellipse , this ellipse right here has more eccentricity than this circle , which has no eccentricity . and an even m... | is the milencovich cycle , eccentricity , obiqity and presession all related to a leap year ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | so let me make everything clear here . right now , i 'm just going to assume earth is rotating and that the orbital direction is in that direction . i 'm going to assume -- let me make that a little bit more curved -- this is the rotation of the earth , it is in this direction right over here . | for the precession , is the axis of the earth rotating in a clockwise or counter-clockwise direction ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | so now based on this , and i think this is what vicksoma might have been hinting at , you say , look , ok , it 's earlier in our orbit . would n't this now be november ? and the answer is no . | so would someone in the southern hemisphere have an opposite solstice ? |
in the video where we first introduced the milankovitch cycles where we talk about the precession and how the tilt of the earth , the obliquity , can also change , i get this comment here on the youtube channel from vicksoma and he or she says , if i understood this correctly , precession changes the time of the season... | it actually occurs a few weeks before the perihelion . so when we are most tilted to the sun , this is our winter solstice . and this is when we are -- actually , in the case of the northern hemisphere , this is when we are most tilted away from the sun , i should say . | and my second question : 1800 years ago was the winter solstice in december ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | let 's say our goal was to figure out the steric number for this carbon . the number of sigma bonds . i know this is a sigma bond . i know on a triple bond , i have one sigma bond and two pi bonds . there are two sigma bonds here and zero lone pairs of electrons . | which bond is stronger , pi or sigma ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | this is no longer a p orbital because we 're going to hybridize it to form our sp hybrid orbital . this is called sp hybridization . this is sp hybridization because our new hybrid orbitals came from one s orbital and one p orbital like that . | is there an sp4 hybridization too ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | we have acetylene here . we have carbon triple bonded to another carbon . we know each of those carbons as sp hybridized . | why ca n't carbon be bonded directly to another carbon using four covalent bonds ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | with a total of three sigma bonds in the acetylene molecule . the video on sp2 hybridization , we saw how to make a pi bond . we had this side by side overlap of orbitals . | for o is 3 so is it sp2 hybridised but how ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | there 's our three sigma bonds and then we have a triple bond presence . there were two pi bonds also present . two of these are pi bonds here . a total of two pi bonds and three sigma bonds for the acetylene molecule here . remember pi bonds prevent free rotation . we ca n't rotate about the sigma bond between the two... | for co2 how would the pi bonds look that are interacting to create the second part of the double bonds ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | : the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | why not no hybridisation at all ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | we had this side by side overlap of orbitals . here we have one pi bond . we have interaction above and below . | also why ca n't the pi bond exist alone ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | we also have a bond angle here . these bond angles are 180 degrees and so we must have a different hybridization for this carbon . we have a different geometry , a different bond angle and a different number of atoms that this carbon is bonded to . to find our new type of hybridization , we look at our electronic confi... | how is hybridization possible between 2 atoms with valence electrons in different energy levels ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | let 's go ahead and do that . using steric number . the hybridization of this carbon . | what if the steric number was 0 or 1 , can you give some examples of where we 'd see that ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | i know on a triple bond , i have one sigma bond and two pi bonds . there are two sigma bonds here and zero lone pairs of electrons . two plus zero gives me two . | of lone pair electrons equal to 0 ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | this is sp hybridization because our new hybrid orbitals came from one s orbital and one p orbital like that . this carbon right here is sp hybridized since it bonded to two atoms and this carbon right here is also sp hybridized . let 's think about the shape of our new sp hybrid orbitals . | there are 2 lone electrons in each of the carbon atoms right ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | i know on a triple bond , i have one sigma bond and two pi bonds . there are two sigma bonds here and zero lone pairs of electrons . two plus zero gives me two . | of lone pair of electrons is 0 ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | also , notice , if you 're dealing with an sp hybridized carbon , you also have two p orbitals . two unhybridized p orbitals . each p orbital with a valence electron . | do we leave two p orbitals because if they ca n't hybridize they could `` fit '' in the compact space between the two , triple-bonded carbons ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | that 's another sigma bond . with a total of three sigma bonds in the acetylene molecule . the video on sp2 hybridization , we saw how to make a pi bond . | how do we figure out the hybridisation of any molecule given to us ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | there 's our three sigma bonds and then we have a triple bond presence . there were two pi bonds also present . two of these are pi bonds here . | also what is the significance of these shorter bonds and smaller orbitals ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | say that 's a signal bond and then this bond over here we said was a sigma bond . there 's our three sigma bonds and then we have a triple bond presence . there were two pi bonds also present . two of these are pi bonds here . a total of two pi bonds and three sigma bonds for the acetylene molecule here . remember pi b... | does it mean these bonds are stronger , or something else entirely ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | also , notice , if you 're dealing with an sp hybridized carbon , you also have two p orbitals . two unhybridized p orbitals . each p orbital with a valence electron . | does hybridization only occur between s and p orbitals ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | let 's go ahead and do that . using steric number . the hybridization of this carbon . | why does a steric number of 3 tell us that boron is sp2 hybridised ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | therefore , this carbon on the right has an sp hybrid orbital with one valence electron in here and then another sp hybrid orbital with one valence electron here . this carbon , it 's sp hybridized . once again , go back up here to this diagram . | for carbon in co , is it sp , sp2 or sp3 hybridized orbital ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | also , notice , if you 're dealing with an sp hybridized carbon , you also have two p orbitals . two unhybridized p orbitals . each p orbital with a valence electron . | so would i be correct in saying that hybridized orbitals have sigma bonds and unhybridized orbitals have pi bonds ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | a total of two pi bonds and three sigma bonds for the acetylene molecule here . remember pi bonds prevent free rotation . we ca n't rotate about the sigma bond between the two carbons because of the pi bonds . | so when you say no free rotation does that mean there are no possible resonance structures ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | we took one s orbital and we took one p orbital , which is shaped like a dumbbell and we hybridized these two orbitals together to give us two new hybrid orbitals . two sp hybrid orbitals . let me go ahead and draw in an sp hybrid orbital here and once again , we 're going to ignore the small lobe . | why do we ignore the back-lobes for sp hybridized orbitals ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | a total of two pi bonds and three sigma bonds for the acetylene molecule here . remember pi bonds prevent free rotation . we ca n't rotate about the sigma bond between the two carbons because of the pi bonds . | of pi bonds directly related to the amount of free rotation ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | a total of two pi bonds and three sigma bonds for the acetylene molecule here . remember pi bonds prevent free rotation . we ca n't rotate about the sigma bond between the two carbons because of the pi bonds . | of pi bonds result and lower free rotation thus making the molecule more stable compared to molecules with less pi bonds and hence more free rotation ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | a total of two pi bonds and three sigma bonds for the acetylene molecule here . remember pi bonds prevent free rotation . we ca n't rotate about the sigma bond between the two carbons because of the pi bonds . | what do you mean by `` no free rotation '' or what is `` free rotation '' ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | we 're gon na promote an s orbital in terms of energy and we 're going to demote a p orbital , only one p orbital this time . we have an s orbital with one electron . a p orbital with one electron . that 's gon na leave behind two p orbitals . | why does that electron in the 2s orbital go to the 2pz orbital although only 2px and 2s orbitals are being hybridized ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | there 's our three sigma bonds and then we have a triple bond presence . there were two pi bonds also present . two of these are pi bonds here . a total of two pi bonds and three sigma bonds for the acetylene molecule here . remember pi bonds prevent free rotation . we ca n't rotate about the sigma bond between the two... | as the number of pi bonds increases , is each pi bonds ' strength affected or stays the same ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | let me go back and look at our diagram again . each carbon , we use red for this . each sp hybridized carbon has an sp orbital with one valence electron in it and we put that in here and then there 's another one . | can you only use a carbon atom ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | i have two sigma bonds here and zero lone pairs of electrons around the carbon . two plus zero gives me a steric number of two . i need two hybrid orbitals for that carbon and of course , that must mean this carbon is sp hybridized . | and what if there are two c atoms and the have different steric numbers ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | from our previous video . i have one sigma bond here and then for this other double bond on the right , i know that one of them is a sigma bond . i have two sigma bonds here and zero lone pairs of electrons around the carbon . | how did you know you only ahve to count 1 of the 2 double bonding in the co2 as sigma bond ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | let 's go ahead and do that . using steric number . the hybridization of this carbon . | how does steric number help determine the bond angle ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | this is no longer a p orbital because we 're going to hybridize it to form our sp hybrid orbital . this is called sp hybridization . this is sp hybridization because our new hybrid orbitals came from one s orbital and one p orbital like that . | why nitrogen in n2o is sp hybridization ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | you see there 's linear geometry for this molecule like that . also in terms of bond length . the distance between these two carbons . | since the bonds between the carbons and hydrogens are also sp hybridized , is each single bond length also roughly 1.2 ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | the distance between these two carbons turns out to be approximately 1.20 angstroms . an even shorter bond length than in our previous videos . once again , that 's due to the increased s character . | is a sp c-h shorter than a sp2 c-h which is shorter than a sp3 c-h bond ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | we took one s orbital and we took one p orbital , which is shaped like a dumbbell and we hybridized these two orbitals together to give us two new hybrid orbitals . two sp hybrid orbitals . let me go ahead and draw in an sp hybrid orbital here and once again , we 're going to ignore the small lobe . | is the single sp c-h shorter than the double sp2 c=c ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | also , notice , if you 're dealing with an sp hybridized carbon , you also have two p orbitals . two unhybridized p orbitals . each p orbital with a valence electron . let me go back down here and i 'm gon na draw in . | why do you promote an s orbital , and not just use the 2 valence electrons from the p orbitals ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | if each of those carbons is sp hybridized , each carbon has two sp hybrid orbitals . we go ahead and draw in one sp hybrid orbital . again , i 'm ignoring the smaller back lobe and here 's our other sp hybrid orbital on this carbon . let me go back and look at our diagram again . | why are we able to forget about the bottom , smaller lobe , of an sp orbital ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | one , two , three and four and we 're looking for two hybrid orbitals since carbon is bonded to two atoms . we 're going to take an s orbital . we 're gon na promote an s orbital in terms of energy and we 're going to demote a p orbital , only one p orbital this time . we have an s orbital with one electron . | is the p orbital going to be bonding , or the sp orbital ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | therefore , this carbon on the right has an sp hybrid orbital with one valence electron in here and then another sp hybrid orbital with one valence electron here . this carbon , it 's sp hybridized . once again , go back up here to this diagram . | cl - be - cl the be atom is sp hybridized , why ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | that means it 's 50 % s character and 50 % p character and this is more s character than in the previous videos . on the video on sp3 hybridization , we 're talking about 25 % s character the video on sp2 hybridization , we talked about 33 % s character and then for these hybrid orbitals , we have even more s character... | what does the length have anything to do with the electron density near the nucleus ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | we took one s orbital and we took one p orbital , which is shaped like a dumbbell and we hybridized these two orbitals together to give us two new hybrid orbitals . two sp hybrid orbitals . let me go ahead and draw in an sp hybrid orbital here and once again , we 're going to ignore the small lobe . | but do the hybrid orbitals form pi-bond between either hybrid or unhybridized orbitals ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | this is no longer a p orbital because we 're going to hybridize it to form our sp hybrid orbital . this is called sp hybridization . this is sp hybridization because our new hybrid orbitals came from one s orbital and one p orbital like that . | could you explain why hybridization applies to oxygen atom as well ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | : the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | in a compound , are all the atoms hybridised or only the central atom ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | the number of sigma bonds . i know this is a sigma bond . i know on a triple bond , i have one sigma bond and two pi bonds . there are two sigma bonds here and zero lone pairs of electrons . | should'nt pi bond be more stronger than sigma bond ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | let 's go ahead and do that . using steric number . the hybridization of this carbon . | what does steric number exactly tell us ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | we took one s orbital and we took one p orbital , which is shaped like a dumbbell and we hybridized these two orbitals together to give us two new hybrid orbitals . two sp hybrid orbitals . let me go ahead and draw in an sp hybrid orbital here and once again , we 're going to ignore the small lobe . we 're going to ign... | when we draw the `` sp '' orbital ( around ) , why do we ignore the small lobe ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | let me go ahead and draw in an sp hybrid orbital here and once again , we 're going to ignore the small lobe . we 're going to ignore the small lobe . when we draw our picture , only think about this bigger frontal lobe here . | are there exceptions in which we would have to incorporate the small lobe into our model ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | once again , a linear geometry with a bond angles of 180 degrees . let 's do one more example using steric number to analyze the molecule . let 's do carbon dioxide . | so is steric concept applied to only one carbon in a molecule like that ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | let 's go ahead and do that . using steric number . the hybridization of this carbon . | is there such thing as a steric number of 1 with the s + p kind of orbitals ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | this carbon is bonded to a hydrogen and it 's also bonded to another carbon . we have carbon bonded to only two atoms and the shape of the acetylene molecule has been determined to be linear . we have a linear geometry . | how do you know which atoms in the molecule hybridize ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | let 's look at our dot structure again . we saw the bond between this carbon and this hydrogen was a sigma bond . we saw there was one sigma bond between our two carbons . | with ethyne , would the length of the sigma bond between the carbons be the same with the sigma bond between a carbon and hydrogen ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | a total of two pi bonds and three sigma bonds for the acetylene molecule here . remember pi bonds prevent free rotation . we ca n't rotate about the sigma bond between the two carbons because of the pi bonds . | what implies the fact that a molecule has no free rotation ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | also , notice , if you 're dealing with an sp hybridized carbon , you also have two p orbitals . two unhybridized p orbitals . each p orbital with a valence electron . | what are the rules of hybridization with p orbitals ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | there 's our three sigma bonds and then we have a triple bond presence . there were two pi bonds also present . two of these are pi bonds here . a total of two pi bonds and three sigma bonds for the acetylene molecule here . remember pi bonds prevent free rotation . we ca n't rotate about the sigma bond between the two... | ... are there 2 pi bonds or 4 pi bonds ? |
: the video on sp3 hybridization , we saw a carbon is bonded to four atoms and in the video in sp2 hybridization , we saw that carbon is bonded to three atoms and in this video , we 're gon na look at the type of hybridization that 's present when carbon is bonded to two atoms . if i look at this carbon right here and... | we 're going to take an s orbital . we 're gon na promote an s orbital in terms of energy and we 're going to demote a p orbital , only one p orbital this time . we have an s orbital with one electron . | how do you know to demote 1 , 2 , or 3 electrons from a p orbital to hybridize it with an s orbital ? |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.