ngram
listlengths 0
10.5k
|
|---|
[
"I am not too keen on referring the the academia community as the",
"seems to be a strong consensus that we need a new custom close",
"general public cannot completely answer this question. > > > I am not",
"the the academia community as the \"general public\" and was hoping to get",
"be a strong consensus that we need a new custom close reason to",
"\"general public\" and was hoping to get some feedback on the exact wording.",
"as the general public cannot completely answer this question. > > > I",
"someone specific to your situation, as the general public cannot completely answer this",
"My Life Story…” questions. See the meta discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions). User [Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929) proposed the",
"is not answerable by the Academia community; you may need to ask someone",
"This question appears to be off-topic because it is not answerable by the",
"the academia community as the \"general public\" and was hoping to get some",
"questions. See the meta discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions). User [Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929) proposed the following: > >",
"community as the \"general public\" and was hoping to get some feedback on",
"the general public cannot completely answer this question. > > > I am",
"off-topic because it is not answerable by the Academia community; you may need",
"want to do X, Here's My Life Story…” questions. See the meta discussion",
"proposed the following: > > This question appears to be off-topic because it",
"ask someone specific to your situation, as the general public cannot completely answer",
"keen on referring the the academia community as the \"general public\" and was",
"consensus that we need a new custom close reason to ban “I want",
"to ask someone specific to your situation, as the general public cannot completely",
"to ban “I want to do X, Here's My Life Story…” questions. See",
"the following: > > This question appears to be off-topic because it is",
"User [Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929) proposed the following: > > This question appears to be off-topic",
"not too keen on referring the the academia community as the \"general public\"",
"[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions). User [Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929) proposed the following: > > This question appears to be",
"need to ask someone specific to your situation, as the general public cannot",
"[Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929) proposed the following: > > This question appears to be off-topic because",
"a strong consensus that we need a new custom close reason to ban",
"you may need to ask someone specific to your situation, as the general",
"following: > > This question appears to be off-topic because it is not",
"answer this question. > > > I am not too keen on referring",
"this question. > > > I am not too keen on referring the",
"strong consensus that we need a new custom close reason to ban “I",
"to be off-topic because it is not answerable by the Academia community; you",
"do X, Here's My Life Story…” questions. See the meta discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions). User",
"to your situation, as the general public cannot completely answer this question. >",
"cannot completely answer this question. > > > I am not too keen",
"your situation, as the general public cannot completely answer this question. > >",
"the Academia community; you may need to ask someone specific to your situation,",
"> > I am not too keen on referring the the academia community",
"Here's My Life Story…” questions. See the meta discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions). User [Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929) proposed",
"See the meta discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions). User [Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929) proposed the following: > > This",
"on referring the the academia community as the \"general public\" and was hoping",
"completely answer this question. > > > I am not too keen on",
"not answerable by the Academia community; you may need to ask someone specific",
"Academia community; you may need to ask someone specific to your situation, as",
"> I am not too keen on referring the the academia community as",
"Life Story…” questions. See the meta discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions). User [Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929) proposed the following:",
"discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions). User [Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929) proposed the following: > > This question appears to",
"> This question appears to be off-topic because it is not answerable by",
"it is not answerable by the Academia community; you may need to ask",
"too keen on referring the the academia community as the \"general public\" and",
"that we need a new custom close reason to ban “I want to",
"by the Academia community; you may need to ask someone specific to your",
"close reason to ban “I want to do X, Here's My Life Story…”",
"may need to ask someone specific to your situation, as the general public",
"meta discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions). User [Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929) proposed the following: > > This question appears",
"custom close reason to ban “I want to do X, Here's My Life",
"referring the the academia community as the \"general public\" and was hoping to",
"public cannot completely answer this question. > > > I am not too",
"need a new custom close reason to ban “I want to do X,",
"new custom close reason to ban “I want to do X, Here's My",
"ban “I want to do X, Here's My Life Story…” questions. See the",
"specific to your situation, as the general public cannot completely answer this question.",
"the \"general public\" and was hoping to get some feedback on the exact",
"situation, as the general public cannot completely answer this question. > > >",
"“I want to do X, Here's My Life Story…” questions. See the meta",
"to be a strong consensus that we need a new custom close reason",
"we need a new custom close reason to ban “I want to do",
"to do X, Here's My Life Story…” questions. See the meta discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions).",
"because it is not answerable by the Academia community; you may need to",
"the meta discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions). User [Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929) proposed the following: > > This question",
"academia community as the \"general public\" and was hoping to get some feedback",
"appears to be off-topic because it is not answerable by the Academia community;",
"a new custom close reason to ban “I want to do X, Here's",
"Story…” questions. See the meta discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions). User [Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929) proposed the following: >",
"> > This question appears to be off-topic because it is not answerable",
"as the \"general public\" and was hoping to get some feedback on the",
"question appears to be off-topic because it is not answerable by the Academia",
"X, Here's My Life Story…” questions. See the meta discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1093/time-to-expressly-ban-i-want-to-do-x-heres-my-life-story-questions). User [Emrakul](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1113/929)",
"There seems to be a strong consensus that we need a new custom",
"am not too keen on referring the the academia community as the \"general",
"reason to ban “I want to do X, Here's My Life Story…” questions.",
"community; you may need to ask someone specific to your situation, as the",
"be off-topic because it is not answerable by the Academia community; you may",
"> > > I am not too keen on referring the the academia",
"answerable by the Academia community; you may need to ask someone specific to",
"question. > > > I am not too keen on referring the the"
] |
[
"user; which she directly brings the user's problem to meta or chat and",
"on Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag) to ask about the usefulness of the tag; * after less",
"delete the tag? I am feeling that the moderator is having wrong adaptation",
"deleted the tag I created `contribution`. The process was this: * She felt",
"noticed that the moderator has deleted the tag I created `contribution`. The process",
"to delete the tag The tag is deleted. I want to know, how",
"one day (22 July), without any answers supporting to delete the tag The",
"about the usefulness of the tag; * after less than one day (22",
"help center because it was not patient, respectful, did not led by example",
"tag I created `contribution`. The process was this: * She felt the tag",
"The tag is deleted. I want to know, how many answers in a",
"moderation action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators), > > We generally expect that moderators: > > - are",
"for their fellow community members in their actions and words > are open",
"the following instructions on help center because it was not patient, respectful, did",
"moderation to keep the community on track and resolve (hopefully) uncommon disputes and",
"that the moderator is having wrong adaptation of the site's policies and is",
"this moderation action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators), > > We generally expect that moderators: > > -",
"important it was not fair. When I read the [help center for this",
"the moderator is having wrong adaptation of the site's policies and is imposing",
"policies and is imposing her personal desires on new user; which she directly",
"after one day, she does every thing she wants. Where is this policy",
"- show respect for their fellow community members in their actions and words",
"meta or chat and after one day, she does every thing she wants.",
"wants. Where is this policy written on help center, I have read the",
"led by example and more important it was not fair. When I read",
"We generally expect that moderators: > > - are patient and fair >",
"delete proposal on meta is required to delete the tag? I am feeling",
"policy and process that described above. This action is against the following instructions",
"Where is this policy written on help center, I have read the help",
"respectful, did not led by example and more important it was not fair.",
"was not fair. When I read the [help center for this moderation action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators),",
"show respect for their fellow community members in their actions and words >",
"the moderator has deleted the tag I created `contribution`. The process was this:",
"example > > - show respect for their fellow community members in their",
"answers supporting to delete the tag The tag is deleted. I want to",
"desires on new user; which she directly brings the user's problem to meta",
"of the tag; * after less than one day (22 July), without any",
"having wrong adaptation of the site's policies and is imposing her personal desires",
"wrong adaptation of the site's policies and is imposing her personal desires on",
"directly brings the user's problem to meta or chat and after one day,",
"center, I have read the help center triple times and found no sign",
"* She felt the tag is duplicate; * She posted [a question on",
"[help center for this moderation action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators), > > We generally expect that moderators:",
"I have noticed that the moderator has deleted the tag I created `contribution`.",
"open to some light but firm moderation to keep the community on track",
"that moderators: > > - are patient and fair > > - lead",
"that the moderator has deleted the tag I created `contribution`. The process was",
"and fair > > - lead by example > > - show respect",
"I created `contribution`. The process was this: * She felt the tag is",
"center triple times and found no sign of such policy and process that",
"supporting to delete the tag The tag is deleted. I want to know,",
"> - are patient and fair > > - lead by example >",
"She posted [a question on Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag) to ask about the usefulness of the",
"for this moderation action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators), > > We generally expect that moderators: > >",
"tag? I am feeling that the moderator is having wrong adaptation of the",
"delete the tag The tag is deleted. I want to know, how many",
"read the help center triple times and found no sign of such policy",
"instructions on help center because it was not patient, respectful, did not led",
"is imposing her personal desires on new user; which she directly brings the",
"chat and after one day, she does every thing she wants. Where is",
"the [help center for this moderation action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators), > > We generally expect that",
"tag; * after less than one day (22 July), without any answers supporting",
"written on help center, I have read the help center triple times and",
"> - show respect for their fellow community members in their actions and",
"patient, respectful, did not led by example and more important it was not",
"she wants. Where is this policy written on help center, I have read",
"community on track and resolve (hopefully) uncommon disputes and exceptions > > >",
"to delete the tag? I am feeling that the moderator is having wrong",
"and words > are open to some light but firm moderation to keep",
"the site's policies and is imposing her personal desires on new user; which",
"and more important it was not fair. When I read the [help center",
"center for this moderation action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators), > > We generally expect that moderators: >",
"against the following instructions on help center because it was not patient, respectful,",
"have read the help center triple times and found no sign of such",
"read the [help center for this moderation action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators), > > We generally expect",
"day (22 July), without any answers supporting to delete the tag The tag",
"center because it was not patient, respectful, did not led by example and",
"user's problem to meta or chat and after one day, she does every",
"some light but firm moderation to keep the community on track and resolve",
"many answers in a delete proposal on meta is required to delete the",
"respect for their fellow community members in their actions and words > are",
"new user; which she directly brings the user's problem to meta or chat",
"feeling that the moderator is having wrong adaptation of the site's policies and",
"the tag? I am feeling that the moderator is having wrong adaptation of",
"created `contribution`. The process was this: * She felt the tag is duplicate;",
"not patient, respectful, did not led by example and more important it was",
"fair > > - lead by example > > - show respect for",
"is required to delete the tag? I am feeling that the moderator is",
"she directly brings the user's problem to meta or chat and after one",
"* She posted [a question on Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag) to ask about the usefulness of",
"the user's problem to meta or chat and after one day, she does",
"am feeling that the moderator is having wrong adaptation of the site's policies",
"day, she does every thing she wants. Where is this policy written on",
"* after less than one day (22 July), without any answers supporting to",
"triple times and found no sign of such policy and process that described",
"July), without any answers supporting to delete the tag The tag is deleted.",
"by example > > - show respect for their fellow community members in",
"This action is against the following instructions on help center because it was",
"- lead by example > > - show respect for their fellow community",
"question on Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag) to ask about the usefulness of the tag; * after",
"proposal on meta is required to delete the tag? I am feeling that",
"of such policy and process that described above. This action is against the",
"is this policy written on help center, I have read the help center",
"She felt the tag is duplicate; * She posted [a question on Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag)",
"firm moderation to keep the community on track and resolve (hopefully) uncommon disputes",
"required to delete the tag? I am feeling that the moderator is having",
"more important it was not fair. When I read the [help center for",
"I am feeling that the moderator is having wrong adaptation of the site's",
"help center triple times and found no sign of such policy and process",
"action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators), > > We generally expect that moderators: > > - are patient",
"the community on track and resolve (hopefully) uncommon disputes and exceptions > >",
"expect that moderators: > > - are patient and fair > > -",
"tag The tag is deleted. I want to know, how many answers in",
"moderator has deleted the tag I created `contribution`. The process was this: *",
"to keep the community on track and resolve (hopefully) uncommon disputes and exceptions",
"to some light but firm moderation to keep the community on track and",
"posted [a question on Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag) to ask about the usefulness of the tag;",
"help center, I have read the help center triple times and found no",
"problem to meta or chat and after one day, she does every thing",
"adaptation of the site's policies and is imposing her personal desires on new",
"this policy written on help center, I have read the help center triple",
"after less than one day (22 July), without any answers supporting to delete",
"this: * She felt the tag is duplicate; * She posted [a question",
"I have read the help center triple times and found no sign of",
"action is against the following instructions on help center because it was not",
"is against the following instructions on help center because it was not patient,",
"no sign of such policy and process that described above. This action is",
"[a question on Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag) to ask about the usefulness of the tag; *",
"described above. This action is against the following instructions on help center because",
"one day, she does every thing she wants. Where is this policy written",
"on meta is required to delete the tag? I am feeling that the",
"not fair. When I read the [help center for this moderation action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators), >",
"> are open to some light but firm moderation to keep the community",
"example and more important it was not fair. When I read the [help",
"every thing she wants. Where is this policy written on help center, I",
"The process was this: * She felt the tag is duplicate; * She",
"meta is required to delete the tag? I am feeling that the moderator",
"have noticed that the moderator has deleted the tag I created `contribution`. The",
"above. This action is against the following instructions on help center because it",
"moderators: > > - are patient and fair > > - lead by",
"personal desires on new user; which she directly brings the user's problem to",
"keep the community on track and resolve (hopefully) uncommon disputes and exceptions >",
"community members in their actions and words > are open to some light",
"does every thing she wants. Where is this policy written on help center,",
"that described above. This action is against the following instructions on help center",
"the tag is duplicate; * She posted [a question on Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag) to ask",
"of the site's policies and is imposing her personal desires on new user;",
"words > are open to some light but firm moderation to keep the",
"generally expect that moderators: > > - are patient and fair > >",
"process that described above. This action is against the following instructions on help",
"are patient and fair > > - lead by example > > -",
"such policy and process that described above. This action is against the following",
"is having wrong adaptation of the site's policies and is imposing her personal",
"thing she wants. Where is this policy written on help center, I have",
"a delete proposal on meta is required to delete the tag? I am",
"to meta or chat and after one day, she does every thing she",
"> > We generally expect that moderators: > > - are patient and",
"> > - lead by example > > - show respect for their",
"in their actions and words > are open to some light but firm",
"did not led by example and more important it was not fair. When",
"by example and more important it was not fair. When I read the",
"fair. When I read the [help center for this moderation action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators), > >",
"fellow community members in their actions and words > are open to some",
"times and found no sign of such policy and process that described above.",
"and found no sign of such policy and process that described above. This",
"sign of such policy and process that described above. This action is against",
"patient and fair > > - lead by example > > - show",
"light but firm moderation to keep the community on track and resolve (hopefully)",
"to know, how many answers in a delete proposal on meta is required",
"know, how many answers in a delete proposal on meta is required to",
"process was this: * She felt the tag is duplicate; * She posted",
"was this: * She felt the tag is duplicate; * She posted [a",
"less than one day (22 July), without any answers supporting to delete the",
"(22 July), without any answers supporting to delete the tag The tag is",
"the tag The tag is deleted. I want to know, how many answers",
"felt the tag is duplicate; * She posted [a question on Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag) to",
"how many answers in a delete proposal on meta is required to delete",
"is deleted. I want to know, how many answers in a delete proposal",
"site's policies and is imposing her personal desires on new user; which she",
"was not patient, respectful, did not led by example and more important it",
"I want to know, how many answers in a delete proposal on meta",
"on help center, I have read the help center triple times and found",
"it was not patient, respectful, did not led by example and more important",
"their actions and words > are open to some light but firm moderation",
"actions and words > are open to some light but firm moderation to",
"are open to some light but firm moderation to keep the community on",
"in a delete proposal on meta is required to delete the tag? I",
"following instructions on help center because it was not patient, respectful, did not",
"because it was not patient, respectful, did not led by example and more",
"not led by example and more important it was not fair. When I",
"deleted. I want to know, how many answers in a delete proposal on",
"the tag; * after less than one day (22 July), without any answers",
"brings the user's problem to meta or chat and after one day, she",
"the usefulness of the tag; * after less than one day (22 July),",
"and process that described above. This action is against the following instructions on",
"any answers supporting to delete the tag The tag is deleted. I want",
"lead by example > > - show respect for their fellow community members",
"want to know, how many answers in a delete proposal on meta is",
"the tag I created `contribution`. The process was this: * She felt the",
"is duplicate; * She posted [a question on Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag) to ask about the",
"duplicate; * She posted [a question on Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag) to ask about the usefulness",
"imposing her personal desires on new user; which she directly brings the user's",
"Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag) to ask about the usefulness of the tag; * after less than",
"When I read the [help center for this moderation action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators), > > We",
"- are patient and fair > > - lead by example > >",
"> We generally expect that moderators: > > - are patient and fair",
"without any answers supporting to delete the tag The tag is deleted. I",
"> > - show respect for their fellow community members in their actions",
"their fellow community members in their actions and words > are open to",
"ask about the usefulness of the tag; * after less than one day",
"and is imposing her personal desires on new user; which she directly brings",
"she does every thing she wants. Where is this policy written on help",
"tag is duplicate; * She posted [a question on Meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1126/usefulness-of-the-contribution-tag) to ask about",
"on new user; which she directly brings the user's problem to meta or",
"policy written on help center, I have read the help center triple times",
"moderator is having wrong adaptation of the site's policies and is imposing her",
"and after one day, she does every thing she wants. Where is this",
"the help center triple times and found no sign of such policy and",
"usefulness of the tag; * after less than one day (22 July), without",
"found no sign of such policy and process that described above. This action",
"I read the [help center for this moderation action](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/site-moderators), > > We generally",
"> - lead by example > > - show respect for their fellow",
"members in their actions and words > are open to some light but",
"> > - are patient and fair > > - lead by example",
"than one day (22 July), without any answers supporting to delete the tag",
"`contribution`. The process was this: * She felt the tag is duplicate; *",
"to ask about the usefulness of the tag; * after less than one",
"but firm moderation to keep the community on track and resolve (hopefully) uncommon",
"tag is deleted. I want to know, how many answers in a delete",
"has deleted the tag I created `contribution`. The process was this: * She",
"on help center because it was not patient, respectful, did not led by",
"it was not fair. When I read the [help center for this moderation",
"which she directly brings the user's problem to meta or chat and after",
"her personal desires on new user; which she directly brings the user's problem",
"answers in a delete proposal on meta is required to delete the tag?",
"or chat and after one day, she does every thing she wants. Where"
] |
[
"tags like [community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community \"show questions tagged 'community'\") or [society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society \"show questions tagged 'society'\")",
"creating this tag is reasonable, what would be a good Tag-Excerpt for it?",
"**update and conclusion** After a few answers are posted to this question with",
"relevant to those question types. Should a [social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website \"show questions tagged 'social-website'\") (or",
"Tag-Excerpt for it? --- **update and conclusion** After a few answers are posted",
"seems to be too broad for the purpose of the social websites and",
"for the purpose of the social websites and is not specific enough. There",
"is asking a question related to social websites on Academia like the cases",
"like [Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook) with almost 85 results, [LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin) with 53 results, etc. s/he has",
"tagged 'social-media'\") has been posted in [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723). Please post your suggestions and",
"vote rate; now, a tag suggestion (including the tag title, tag excerpt and",
"a question related to social websites on Academia like the cases which are",
"suitable tag for the question which seems to be too broad for the",
"rate; now, a tag suggestion (including the tag title, tag excerpt and tag",
"answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723). Please post your suggestions and comments to that answer to improve the",
"tag title, tag excerpt and tag wiki) for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\")",
"like the cases which are found by searching keywords like [Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook) with almost",
"been posted in [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723). Please post your suggestions and comments to that",
"(including the tag title, tag excerpt and tag wiki) for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions",
"and is not specific enough. There are also some other tags like [community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community",
"if creating this tag is reasonable, what would be a good Tag-Excerpt for",
"positive vote rate; now, a tag suggestion (including the tag title, tag excerpt",
"to those question types. Should a [social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website \"show questions tagged 'social-website'\") (or an",
"are found by searching keywords like [Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook) with almost 85 results, [LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin) with",
"the cases which are found by searching keywords like [Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook) with almost 85",
"but none of which are so relevant to those question types. Should a",
"There are also some other tags like [community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community \"show questions tagged 'community'\") or",
"like [community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community \"show questions tagged 'community'\") or [society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society \"show questions tagged 'society'\") but",
"tag) be created on the Academia and if creating this tag is reasonable,",
"tag is reasonable, what would be a good Tag-Excerpt for it? --- **update",
"has only [website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website \"show questions tagged 'website'\") option to choose a suitable tag",
"excerpt and tag wiki) for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") has been posted",
"few answers are posted to this question with positive vote rate; now, a",
"'society'\") but none of which are so relevant to those question types. Should",
"the question which seems to be too broad for the purpose of the",
"the social websites and is not specific enough. There are also some other",
"option to choose a suitable tag for the question which seems to be",
"Academia and if creating this tag is reasonable, what would be a good",
"questions tagged 'community'\") or [society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society \"show questions tagged 'society'\") but none of which",
"Please post your suggestions and comments to that answer to improve the suggested",
"'social-media'\") has been posted in [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723). Please post your suggestions and comments",
"posted in [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723). Please post your suggestions and comments to that answer",
"which are found by searching keywords like [Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook) with almost 85 results, [LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin)",
"[social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") has been posted in [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723). Please post",
"\"show questions tagged 'society'\") but none of which are so relevant to those",
"good Tag-Excerpt for it? --- **update and conclusion** After a few answers are",
"[community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community \"show questions tagged 'community'\") or [society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society \"show questions tagged 'society'\") but none",
"title, tag excerpt and tag wiki) for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") has",
"tagged 'social-website'\") (or an equivalent tag) be created on the Academia and if",
"to this question with positive vote rate; now, a tag suggestion (including the",
"by searching keywords like [Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook) with almost 85 results, [LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin) with 53 results,",
"to social websites on Academia like the cases which are found by searching",
"not specific enough. There are also some other tags like [community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community \"show questions",
"and conclusion** After a few answers are posted to this question with positive",
"this question with positive vote rate; now, a tag suggestion (including the tag",
"[this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723). Please post your suggestions and comments to that answer to improve",
"types. Should a [social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website \"show questions tagged 'social-website'\") (or an equivalent tag) be",
"\"show questions tagged 'community'\") or [society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society \"show questions tagged 'society'\") but none of",
"question types. Should a [social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website \"show questions tagged 'social-website'\") (or an equivalent tag)",
"with positive vote rate; now, a tag suggestion (including the tag title, tag",
"etc. s/he has only [website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website \"show questions tagged 'website'\") option to choose a",
"with 53 results, etc. s/he has only [website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website \"show questions tagged 'website'\") option",
"a [social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website \"show questions tagged 'social-website'\") (or an equivalent tag) be created on",
"questions tagged 'society'\") but none of which are so relevant to those question",
"too broad for the purpose of the social websites and is not specific",
"on the Academia and if creating this tag is reasonable, what would be",
"found by searching keywords like [Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook) with almost 85 results, [LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin) with 53",
"with almost 85 results, [LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin) with 53 results, etc. s/he has only [website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website",
"is reasonable, what would be a good Tag-Excerpt for it? --- **update and",
"suggestions and comments to that answer to improve the suggested tag title and",
"conclusion** After a few answers are posted to this question with positive vote",
"none of which are so relevant to those question types. Should a [social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website",
"are posted to this question with positive vote rate; now, a tag suggestion",
"the purpose of the social websites and is not specific enough. There are",
"asking a question related to social websites on Academia like the cases which",
"Should a [social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website \"show questions tagged 'social-website'\") (or an equivalent tag) be created",
"wiki) for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") has been posted in [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723).",
"'community'\") or [society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society \"show questions tagged 'society'\") but none of which are so",
"[website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website \"show questions tagged 'website'\") option to choose a suitable tag for the",
"choose a suitable tag for the question which seems to be too broad",
"what would be a good Tag-Excerpt for it? --- **update and conclusion** After",
"specific enough. There are also some other tags like [community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community \"show questions tagged",
"websites and is not specific enough. There are also some other tags like",
"created on the Academia and if creating this tag is reasonable, what would",
"\"show questions tagged 'website'\") option to choose a suitable tag for the question",
"tag wiki) for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") has been posted in [this",
"a suitable tag for the question which seems to be too broad for",
"websites on Academia like the cases which are found by searching keywords like",
"cases which are found by searching keywords like [Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook) with almost 85 results,",
"tagged 'community'\") or [society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society \"show questions tagged 'society'\") but none of which are",
"s/he has only [website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website \"show questions tagged 'website'\") option to choose a suitable",
"results, [LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin) with 53 results, etc. s/he has only [website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website \"show questions tagged",
"When one is asking a question related to social websites on Academia like",
"social websites on Academia like the cases which are found by searching keywords",
"those question types. Should a [social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website \"show questions tagged 'social-website'\") (or an equivalent",
"related to social websites on Academia like the cases which are found by",
"question related to social websites on Academia like the cases which are found",
"to choose a suitable tag for the question which seems to be too",
"are so relevant to those question types. Should a [social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website \"show questions tagged",
"\"show questions tagged 'social-website'\") (or an equivalent tag) be created on the Academia",
"tag excerpt and tag wiki) for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") has been",
"53 results, etc. s/he has only [website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website \"show questions tagged 'website'\") option to",
"or [society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society \"show questions tagged 'society'\") but none of which are so relevant",
"and comments to that answer to improve the suggested tag title and excerpt.",
"post your suggestions and comments to that answer to improve the suggested tag",
"searching keywords like [Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook) with almost 85 results, [LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin) with 53 results, etc.",
"be created on the Academia and if creating this tag is reasonable, what",
"so relevant to those question types. Should a [social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website \"show questions tagged 'social-website'\")",
"tag suggestion (including the tag title, tag excerpt and tag wiki) for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media",
"questions tagged 'website'\") option to choose a suitable tag for the question which",
"of which are so relevant to those question types. Should a [social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website \"show",
"for it? --- **update and conclusion** After a few answers are posted to",
"only [website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website \"show questions tagged 'website'\") option to choose a suitable tag for",
"which are so relevant to those question types. Should a [social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website \"show questions",
"is not specific enough. There are also some other tags like [community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community \"show",
"[LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin) with 53 results, etc. s/he has only [website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website \"show questions tagged 'website'\")",
"some other tags like [community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community \"show questions tagged 'community'\") or [society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society \"show questions",
"purpose of the social websites and is not specific enough. There are also",
"keywords like [Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook) with almost 85 results, [LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin) with 53 results, etc. s/he",
"reasonable, what would be a good Tag-Excerpt for it? --- **update and conclusion**",
"results, etc. s/he has only [website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website \"show questions tagged 'website'\") option to choose",
"be too broad for the purpose of the social websites and is not",
"this tag is reasonable, what would be a good Tag-Excerpt for it? ---",
"tagged 'website'\") option to choose a suitable tag for the question which seems",
"--- **update and conclusion** After a few answers are posted to this question",
"and if creating this tag is reasonable, what would be a good Tag-Excerpt",
"question which seems to be too broad for the purpose of the social",
"for the question which seems to be too broad for the purpose of",
"'social-website'\") (or an equivalent tag) be created on the Academia and if creating",
"a good Tag-Excerpt for it? --- **update and conclusion** After a few answers",
"tagged 'society'\") but none of which are so relevant to those question types.",
"equivalent tag) be created on the Academia and if creating this tag is",
"tag for the question which seems to be too broad for the purpose",
"one is asking a question related to social websites on Academia like the",
"has been posted in [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723). Please post your suggestions and comments to",
"a tag suggestion (including the tag title, tag excerpt and tag wiki) for",
"in [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723). Please post your suggestions and comments to that answer to",
"answers are posted to this question with positive vote rate; now, a tag",
"for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") has been posted in [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723). Please",
"Academia like the cases which are found by searching keywords like [Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook) with",
"other tags like [community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community \"show questions tagged 'community'\") or [society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society \"show questions tagged",
"[social-website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-website \"show questions tagged 'social-website'\") (or an equivalent tag) be created on the",
"on Academia like the cases which are found by searching keywords like [Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook)",
"[society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society \"show questions tagged 'society'\") but none of which are so relevant to",
"which seems to be too broad for the purpose of the social websites",
"now, a tag suggestion (including the tag title, tag excerpt and tag wiki)",
"posted to this question with positive vote rate; now, a tag suggestion (including",
"are also some other tags like [community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community \"show questions tagged 'community'\") or [society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society",
"After a few answers are posted to this question with positive vote rate;",
"an equivalent tag) be created on the Academia and if creating this tag",
"'website'\") option to choose a suitable tag for the question which seems to",
"questions tagged 'social-media'\") has been posted in [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723). Please post your suggestions",
"social websites and is not specific enough. There are also some other tags",
"broad for the purpose of the social websites and is not specific enough.",
"a few answers are posted to this question with positive vote rate; now,",
"85 results, [LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin) with 53 results, etc. s/he has only [website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website \"show questions",
"also some other tags like [community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community \"show questions tagged 'community'\") or [society](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/society \"show",
"would be a good Tag-Excerpt for it? --- **update and conclusion** After a",
"suggestion (including the tag title, tag excerpt and tag wiki) for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show",
"[Facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=facebook) with almost 85 results, [LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin) with 53 results, etc. s/he has only",
"your suggestions and comments to that answer to improve the suggested tag title",
"enough. There are also some other tags like [community](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/community \"show questions tagged 'community'\")",
"to be too broad for the purpose of the social websites and is",
"questions tagged 'social-website'\") (or an equivalent tag) be created on the Academia and",
"the Academia and if creating this tag is reasonable, what would be a",
"\"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") has been posted in [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1146/15723). Please post your",
"(or an equivalent tag) be created on the Academia and if creating this",
"of the social websites and is not specific enough. There are also some",
"and tag wiki) for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") has been posted in",
"question with positive vote rate; now, a tag suggestion (including the tag title,",
"the tag title, tag excerpt and tag wiki) for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged",
"be a good Tag-Excerpt for it? --- **update and conclusion** After a few",
"it? --- **update and conclusion** After a few answers are posted to this",
"almost 85 results, [LinkedIn](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=linkedin) with 53 results, etc. s/he has only [website](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/website \"show"
] |
[
"concerned that \"rant\" is just a trope used by high-ranking users on this",
"> > This definition characterizes most online behavior, unfortunately. That anger is also",
"unfortunately. That anger is also very real - what should unsuccessful posters do",
"have not seen on other websites and I would like some clarification. There",
"> **[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)** to talk loudly and in a way that shows anger :",
"up this word to see what it could mean: > > **[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)** to",
"the [help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) section of Academia.SE and even a small section on [what not",
"word **rant** is being used in a way that I have not seen",
"answers to my questions. Here on Academia.SE the word **rant** is being used",
"is also very real - what should unsuccessful posters do with it? ---",
"100 of them) to get answers to my questions. Here on Academia.SE the",
"for international students\", which was an undisguised rant. > > > Let me",
"that I have not seen on other websites and I would like some",
"is just a trope used by high-ranking users on this site to close/delete",
"way that I have not seen on other websites and I would like",
"\"not a question\" post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post) > > Recently, someone posted the question \"Fee surcharge",
"was an undisguised rant. > > > Let me look up this word",
"a question\" post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post) > > Recently, someone posted the question \"Fee surcharge for",
"> > **[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)** to talk loudly and in a way that shows anger",
"my questions. Here on Academia.SE the word **rant** is being used in a",
"online behavior, unfortunately. That anger is also very real - what should unsuccessful",
"I would like some clarification. There are some guidelines in the [help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) section",
"could mean: > > **[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)** to talk loudly and in a way that",
"(there are about 100 of them) to get answers to my questions. Here",
"get answers to my questions. Here on Academia.SE the word **rant** is being",
"[Possible \"not a question\" post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post) > > Recently, someone posted the question \"Fee",
"mean: > > **[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)** to talk loudly and in a way that shows",
"- what should unsuccessful posters do with it? --- Specifically, I am concerned",
"anger : to complain in a way that is unreasonable > > >",
"small section on [what not to ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask). I still confused and find the",
"on here very subjective. Example [Possible \"not a question\" post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post) > > Recently,",
"unreasonable > > > This definition characterizes most online behavior, unfortunately. That anger",
"Academia.SE and even a small section on [what not to ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask). I still",
"question \"Fee surcharge for international students\", which was an undisguised rant. > >",
"anger is also very real - what should unsuccessful posters do with it?",
"[help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) section of Academia.SE and even a small section on [what not to",
"are some guidelines in the [help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) section of Academia.SE and even a small",
"international students\", which was an undisguised rant. > > > Let me look",
"this word to see what it could mean: > > **[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)** to talk",
"have used other [stack-exchange websites](http://stackexchange.com/sites) successfully (there are about 100 of them) to",
"even a small section on [what not to ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask). I still confused and",
"> > Recently, someone posted the question \"Fee surcharge for international students\", which",
"[stack-exchange websites](http://stackexchange.com/sites) successfully (there are about 100 of them) to get answers to",
"use on here very subjective. Example [Possible \"not a question\" post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post) > >",
"questions. Here on Academia.SE the word **rant** is being used in a way",
"word to see what it could mean: > > **[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)** to talk loudly",
"Example [Possible \"not a question\" post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post) > > Recently, someone posted the question",
"successfully (there are about 100 of them) to get answers to my questions.",
"a way that is unreasonable > > > This definition characterizes most online",
"I am concerned that \"rant\" is just a trope used by high-ranking users",
"that \"rant\" is just a trope used by high-ranking users on this site",
"other [stack-exchange websites](http://stackexchange.com/sites) successfully (there are about 100 of them) to get answers",
"most online behavior, unfortunately. That anger is also very real - what should",
"a trope used by high-ranking users on this site to close/delete questions they",
"posters do with it? --- Specifically, I am concerned that \"rant\" is just",
"That anger is also very real - what should unsuccessful posters do with",
"what it could mean: > > **[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)** to talk loudly and in a",
"not seen on other websites and I would like some clarification. There are",
"\"Fee surcharge for international students\", which was an undisguised rant. > > >",
"other websites and I would like some clarification. There are some guidelines in",
"subjective. Example [Possible \"not a question\" post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post) > > Recently, someone posted the",
"post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post) > > Recently, someone posted the question \"Fee surcharge for international students\",",
"to complain in a way that is unreasonable > > > This definition",
"Academia.SE the word **rant** is being used in a way that I have",
"it could mean: > > **[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)** to talk loudly and in a way",
"--- Specifically, I am concerned that \"rant\" is just a trope used by",
"and find the use on here very subjective. Example [Possible \"not a question\"",
"a way that shows anger : to complain in a way that is",
"are about 100 of them) to get answers to my questions. Here on",
"do with it? --- Specifically, I am concerned that \"rant\" is just a",
"Specifically, I am concerned that \"rant\" is just a trope used by high-ranking",
"and in a way that shows anger : to complain in a way",
"in a way that I have not seen on other websites and I",
"ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask). I still confused and find the use on here very subjective. Example",
"which was an undisguised rant. > > > Let me look up this",
"of Academia.SE and even a small section on [what not to ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask). I",
"> > > Let me look up this word to see what it",
"There are some guidelines in the [help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) section of Academia.SE and even a",
"to see what it could mean: > > **[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)** to talk loudly and",
"and even a small section on [what not to ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask). I still confused",
": to complain in a way that is unreasonable > > > This",
"> > > This definition characterizes most online behavior, unfortunately. That anger is",
"to get answers to my questions. Here on Academia.SE the word **rant** is",
"**[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)** to talk loudly and in a way that shows anger : to",
"a way that I have not seen on other websites and I would",
"what should unsuccessful posters do with it? --- Specifically, I am concerned that",
"an undisguised rant. > > > Let me look up this word to",
"me look up this word to see what it could mean: > >",
"used in a way that I have not seen on other websites and",
"them) to get answers to my questions. Here on Academia.SE the word **rant**",
"Here on Academia.SE the word **rant** is being used in a way that",
"> Let me look up this word to see what it could mean:",
"used other [stack-exchange websites](http://stackexchange.com/sites) successfully (there are about 100 of them) to get",
"look up this word to see what it could mean: > > **[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)**",
"and I would like some clarification. There are some guidelines in the [help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask)",
"[what not to ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask). I still confused and find the use on here",
"websites and I would like some clarification. There are some guidelines in the",
"some guidelines in the [help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) section of Academia.SE and even a small section",
"of them) to get answers to my questions. Here on Academia.SE the word",
"some clarification. There are some guidelines in the [help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) section of Academia.SE and",
"like some clarification. There are some guidelines in the [help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) section of Academia.SE",
"the question \"Fee surcharge for international students\", which was an undisguised rant. >",
"confused and find the use on here very subjective. Example [Possible \"not a",
"I have used other [stack-exchange websites](http://stackexchange.com/sites) successfully (there are about 100 of them)",
"also very real - what should unsuccessful posters do with it? --- Specifically,",
"a small section on [what not to ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask). I still confused and find",
"that is unreasonable > > > This definition characterizes most online behavior, unfortunately.",
"in a way that shows anger : to complain in a way that",
"the word **rant** is being used in a way that I have not",
"section on [what not to ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask). I still confused and find the use",
"on Academia.SE the word **rant** is being used in a way that I",
"guidelines in the [help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) section of Academia.SE and even a small section on",
"with it? --- Specifically, I am concerned that \"rant\" is just a trope",
"Let me look up this word to see what it could mean: >",
"is unreasonable > > > This definition characterizes most online behavior, unfortunately. That",
"very real - what should unsuccessful posters do with it? --- Specifically, I",
"characterizes most online behavior, unfortunately. That anger is also very real - what",
"still confused and find the use on here very subjective. Example [Possible \"not",
"loudly and in a way that shows anger : to complain in a",
"about 100 of them) to get answers to my questions. Here on Academia.SE",
"to my questions. Here on Academia.SE the word **rant** is being used in",
"> > Let me look up this word to see what it could",
"clarification. There are some guidelines in the [help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) section of Academia.SE and even",
"in the [help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) section of Academia.SE and even a small section on [what",
"> Recently, someone posted the question \"Fee surcharge for international students\", which was",
"not to ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask). I still confused and find the use on here very",
"rant. > > > Let me look up this word to see what",
"see what it could mean: > > **[rant](http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rant)** to talk loudly and in",
"real - what should unsuccessful posters do with it? --- Specifically, I am",
"find the use on here very subjective. Example [Possible \"not a question\" post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post)",
"talk loudly and in a way that shows anger : to complain in",
"that shows anger : to complain in a way that is unreasonable >",
"Recently, someone posted the question \"Fee surcharge for international students\", which was an",
"unsuccessful posters do with it? --- Specifically, I am concerned that \"rant\" is",
"> This definition characterizes most online behavior, unfortunately. That anger is also very",
"\"rant\" is just a trope used by high-ranking users on this site to",
"I have not seen on other websites and I would like some clarification.",
"definition characterizes most online behavior, unfortunately. That anger is also very real -",
"undisguised rant. > > > Let me look up this word to see",
"section of Academia.SE and even a small section on [what not to ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask).",
"to ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask). I still confused and find the use on here very subjective.",
"am concerned that \"rant\" is just a trope used by high-ranking users on",
"on [what not to ask](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask). I still confused and find the use on",
"is being used in a way that I have not seen on other",
"it? --- Specifically, I am concerned that \"rant\" is just a trope used",
"being used in a way that I have not seen on other websites",
"This definition characterizes most online behavior, unfortunately. That anger is also very real",
"students\", which was an undisguised rant. > > > Let me look up",
"question\" post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post) > > Recently, someone posted the question \"Fee surcharge for international",
"the use on here very subjective. Example [Possible \"not a question\" post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post) >",
"trope used by high-ranking users on this site to close/delete questions they don't",
"way that is unreasonable > > > This definition characterizes most online behavior,",
"should unsuccessful posters do with it? --- Specifically, I am concerned that \"rant\"",
"to talk loudly and in a way that shows anger : to complain",
"shows anger : to complain in a way that is unreasonable > >",
"someone posted the question \"Fee surcharge for international students\", which was an undisguised",
"here very subjective. Example [Possible \"not a question\" post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post) > > Recently, someone",
"complain in a way that is unreasonable > > > This definition characterizes",
"I still confused and find the use on here very subjective. Example [Possible",
"way that shows anger : to complain in a way that is unreasonable",
"just a trope used by high-ranking users on this site to close/delete questions",
"on other websites and I would like some clarification. There are some guidelines",
"would like some clarification. There are some guidelines in the [help](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) section of",
"behavior, unfortunately. That anger is also very real - what should unsuccessful posters",
"in a way that is unreasonable > > > This definition characterizes most",
"surcharge for international students\", which was an undisguised rant. > > > Let",
"**rant** is being used in a way that I have not seen on",
"posted the question \"Fee surcharge for international students\", which was an undisguised rant.",
"used by high-ranking users on this site to close/delete questions they don't like.",
"websites](http://stackexchange.com/sites) successfully (there are about 100 of them) to get answers to my",
"seen on other websites and I would like some clarification. There are some",
"very subjective. Example [Possible \"not a question\" post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/425/possible-not-a-question-post) > > Recently, someone posted"
] |
[
"for such questions. --- Should we agree on this: What should this tag",
"following words mainly used in the context of disreputable publishers yields the following",
"is not one keyword shared amongst all questions about this subject – some",
"of these questions are actually about disreputable publishers and the search results are",
"search results are not disjunct, but I consider it safe to assume that",
"that there are more than 20 questions about this subject without counting them.",
"but I consider it safe to assume that there are more than 20",
"not one keyword shared amongst all questions about this subject – some examples",
"are not disjunct, but I consider it safe to assume that there are",
"this subject – some examples lacking the respective keywords: [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734), [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734), [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734), [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734).",
"[fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734), [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734). Therefore it is difficult to access all our information about this",
"one might easily miss something. I therefore suggest that we create a tag",
"without counting them. There is not one keyword shared amongst all questions about",
"keyword shared amongst all questions about this subject – some examples lacking the",
"keywords: [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734), [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734), [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734), [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734). Therefore it is difficult to access all our",
"about this subject and one might easily miss something. I therefore suggest that",
"and one might easily miss something. I therefore suggest that we create a",
"easily miss something. I therefore suggest that we create a tag for such",
"might easily miss something. I therefore suggest that we create a tag for",
"about this subject – some examples lacking the respective keywords: [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734), [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734), [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734),",
"something. I therefore suggest that we create a tag for such questions. ---",
"them. There is not one keyword shared amongst all questions about this subject",
"suggest that we create a tag for such questions. --- Should we agree",
"[scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion): 8 results * [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion): 5 results Now, not all of these questions",
"for questions containing the following words mainly used in the context of disreputable",
"8 results * [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion): 5 results Now, not all of these questions are",
"create a tag for such questions. --- Should we agree on this: What",
"the following number of results: * [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion): 23 results * [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion): 13 results",
"to assume that there are more than 20 questions about this subject without",
"used in the context of disreputable publishers yields the following number of results:",
"are more than 20 questions about this subject without counting them. There is",
"and the search results are not disjunct, but I consider it safe to",
"I consider it safe to assume that there are more than 20 questions",
"13 results * [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion): 8 results * [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion): 5 results Now, not all",
"than 20 questions about this subject without counting them. There is not one",
"questions containing the following words mainly used in the context of disreputable publishers",
"such questions. --- Should we agree on this: What should this tag be",
"not all of these questions are actually about disreputable publishers and the search",
"subject and one might easily miss something. I therefore suggest that we create",
"results * [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion): 5 results Now, not all of these questions are actually",
"the search results are not disjunct, but I consider it safe to assume",
"23 results * [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion): 13 results * [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion): 8 results * [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion): 5",
"the context of disreputable publishers yields the following number of results: * [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion):",
"[predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734), [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734), [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734), [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734). Therefore it is difficult to access all our information",
"examples lacking the respective keywords: [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734), [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734), [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734), [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734). Therefore it is difficult",
"one keyword shared amongst all questions about this subject – some examples lacking",
"context of disreputable publishers yields the following number of results: * [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion): 23",
"difficult to access all our information about this subject and one might easily",
"containing the following words mainly used in the context of disreputable publishers yields",
"results: * [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion): 23 results * [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion): 13 results * [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion): 8 results",
"about disreputable publishers and the search results are not disjunct, but I consider",
"following number of results: * [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion): 23 results * [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion): 13 results *",
"yields the following number of results: * [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion): 23 results * [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion): 13",
"our information about this subject and one might easily miss something. I therefore",
"results * [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion): 13 results * [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion): 8 results * [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion): 5 results",
"there are more than 20 questions about this subject without counting them. There",
"this subject without counting them. There is not one keyword shared amongst all",
"of disreputable publishers yields the following number of results: * [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion): 23 results",
"information about this subject and one might easily miss something. I therefore suggest",
"20 questions about this subject without counting them. There is not one keyword",
"amongst all questions about this subject – some examples lacking the respective keywords:",
"* [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion): 8 results * [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion): 5 results Now, not all of these",
"[shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734). Therefore it is difficult to access all our information about this subject",
"it is difficult to access all our information about this subject and one",
"– some examples lacking the respective keywords: [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734), [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734), [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734), [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734). Therefore it",
"I therefore suggest that we create a tag for such questions. --- Should",
"it safe to assume that there are more than 20 questions about this",
"consider it safe to assume that there are more than 20 questions about",
"5 results Now, not all of these questions are actually about disreputable publishers",
"[fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion): 23 results * [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion): 13 results * [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion): 8 results * [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion):",
"questions are actually about disreputable publishers and the search results are not disjunct,",
"[scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734), [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734), [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734). Therefore it is difficult to access all our information about",
"number of results: * [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion): 23 results * [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion): 13 results * [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion):",
"miss something. I therefore suggest that we create a tag for such questions.",
"all of these questions are actually about disreputable publishers and the search results",
"subject without counting them. There is not one keyword shared amongst all questions",
"are actually about disreputable publishers and the search results are not disjunct, but",
"this subject and one might easily miss something. I therefore suggest that we",
"a tag for such questions. --- Should we agree on this: What should",
"searching for questions containing the following words mainly used in the context of",
"of results: * [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion): 23 results * [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion): 13 results * [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion): 8",
"the respective keywords: [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734), [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734), [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734), [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734). Therefore it is difficult to access",
"now, searching for questions containing the following words mainly used in the context",
"that we create a tag for such questions. --- Should we agree on",
"in the context of disreputable publishers yields the following number of results: *",
"therefore suggest that we create a tag for such questions. --- Should we",
"shared amongst all questions about this subject – some examples lacking the respective",
"As of now, searching for questions containing the following words mainly used in",
"about this subject without counting them. There is not one keyword shared amongst",
"assume that there are more than 20 questions about this subject without counting",
"all questions about this subject – some examples lacking the respective keywords: [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734),",
"[shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion): 5 results Now, not all of these questions are actually about disreputable",
"* [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion): 23 results * [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion): 13 results * [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion): 8 results *",
"safe to assume that there are more than 20 questions about this subject",
"results * [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion): 8 results * [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion): 5 results Now, not all of",
"There is not one keyword shared amongst all questions about this subject –",
"is difficult to access all our information about this subject and one might",
"Now, not all of these questions are actually about disreputable publishers and the",
"counting them. There is not one keyword shared amongst all questions about this",
"[predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion): 13 results * [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion): 8 results * [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion): 5 results Now, not",
"actually about disreputable publishers and the search results are not disjunct, but I",
"access all our information about this subject and one might easily miss something.",
"publishers yields the following number of results: * [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion): 23 results * [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion):",
"these questions are actually about disreputable publishers and the search results are not",
"of now, searching for questions containing the following words mainly used in the",
"some examples lacking the respective keywords: [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734), [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734), [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734), [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734). Therefore it is",
"results Now, not all of these questions are actually about disreputable publishers and",
"subject – some examples lacking the respective keywords: [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734), [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734), [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734), [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734). Therefore",
"tag for such questions. --- Should we agree on this: What should this",
"questions. --- Should we agree on this: What should this tag be called?",
"disreputable publishers yields the following number of results: * [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=fake+is%3Aquestion): 23 results *",
"* [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion): 5 results Now, not all of these questions are actually about",
"questions about this subject – some examples lacking the respective keywords: [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734), [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734),",
"publishers and the search results are not disjunct, but I consider it safe",
"Therefore it is difficult to access all our information about this subject and",
"to access all our information about this subject and one might easily miss",
"all our information about this subject and one might easily miss something. I",
"* [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=predatory+is%3Aquestion): 13 results * [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=scam+is%3Aquestion): 8 results * [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=shady+is%3Aquestion): 5 results Now,",
"mainly used in the context of disreputable publishers yields the following number of",
"results are not disjunct, but I consider it safe to assume that there",
"disreputable publishers and the search results are not disjunct, but I consider it",
"not disjunct, but I consider it safe to assume that there are more",
"questions about this subject without counting them. There is not one keyword shared",
"disjunct, but I consider it safe to assume that there are more than",
"more than 20 questions about this subject without counting them. There is not",
"respective keywords: [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734), [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734), [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734), [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734). Therefore it is difficult to access all",
"the following words mainly used in the context of disreputable publishers yields the",
"we create a tag for such questions. --- Should we agree on this:",
"lacking the respective keywords: [predatory](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/25916/7734), [scam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17379/7734), [fake](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23332/7734), [shady](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/26455/7734). Therefore it is difficult to",
"words mainly used in the context of disreputable publishers yields the following number"
] |
[
"to 10k+ users)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26842/how-to-deal-with-a-student-who-harasses-the-inexperienced-teacher-during-class/26887#26887) that uses both expletives and suggests a pretty extreme form",
"a pretty extreme form of student teacher interaction. This answer has been flagged",
"being offensive. The flags require the diamond mods to make a decision. We",
"require the diamond mods to make a decision. We can do nothing, delete",
"interaction. This answer has been flagged a number of times as being offensive.",
"language) allowed on SE sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites). Do we want a no nonsense you curse",
"a little more relaxed? Are extreme views that do not single out individuals",
"a number of times as being offensive. The flags require the diamond mods",
"make a decision. We can do nothing, delete the answer, or warn/suspend the",
"teacher interaction. This answer has been flagged a number of times as being",
"the answer, or warn/suspend the user. Expletives are not appreciated on SE, and",
"has been flagged a number of times as being offensive. The flags require",
"allowed on SE sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites). Do we want a no nonsense you curse you",
"number of times as being offensive. The flags require the diamond mods to",
"This answer has been flagged a number of times as being offensive. The",
"flagged a number of times as being offensive. The flags require the diamond",
"appreciated on SE, and may be against the rules: [Are expletives (cursing, swear",
"words or vulgar language) allowed on SE sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites). Do we want a no",
"rules: [Are expletives (cursing, swear words or vulgar language) allowed on SE sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites).",
"as being offensive. The flags require the diamond mods to make a decision.",
"you curse you get warned policy or do we want to be a",
"more relaxed? Are extreme views that do not single out individuals or groups",
"do we want to be a little more relaxed? Are extreme views that",
"to make a decision. We can do nothing, delete the answer, or warn/suspend",
"be against the rules: [Are expletives (cursing, swear words or vulgar language) allowed",
"(cursing, swear words or vulgar language) allowed on SE sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites). Do we want",
"We can do nothing, delete the answer, or warn/suspend the user. Expletives are",
"may be against the rules: [Are expletives (cursing, swear words or vulgar language)",
"or vulgar language) allowed on SE sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites). Do we want a no nonsense",
"pretty extreme form of student teacher interaction. This answer has been flagged a",
"was an [answer (only viewable to 10k+ users)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26842/how-to-deal-with-a-student-who-harasses-the-inexperienced-teacher-during-class/26887#26887) that uses both expletives and",
"vulgar language) allowed on SE sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites). Do we want a no nonsense you",
"or do we want to be a little more relaxed? Are extreme views",
"viewable to 10k+ users)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26842/how-to-deal-with-a-student-who-harasses-the-inexperienced-teacher-during-class/26887#26887) that uses both expletives and suggests a pretty extreme",
"be a little more relaxed? Are extreme views that do not single out",
"been flagged a number of times as being offensive. The flags require the",
"Do we want a no nonsense you curse you get warned policy or",
"not single out individuals or groups offensive and warrant the deletion of an",
"on SE sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites). Do we want a no nonsense you curse you get",
"the rules: [Are expletives (cursing, swear words or vulgar language) allowed on SE",
"10k+ users)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26842/how-to-deal-with-a-student-who-harasses-the-inexperienced-teacher-during-class/26887#26887) that uses both expletives and suggests a pretty extreme form of",
"delete the answer, or warn/suspend the user. Expletives are not appreciated on SE,",
"a no nonsense you curse you get warned policy or do we want",
"suggests a pretty extreme form of student teacher interaction. This answer has been",
"do nothing, delete the answer, or warn/suspend the user. Expletives are not appreciated",
"not appreciated on SE, and may be against the rules: [Are expletives (cursing,",
"diamond mods to make a decision. We can do nothing, delete the answer,",
"that uses both expletives and suggests a pretty extreme form of student teacher",
"warn/suspend the user. Expletives are not appreciated on SE, and may be against",
"form of student teacher interaction. This answer has been flagged a number of",
"want to be a little more relaxed? Are extreme views that do not",
"expletives (cursing, swear words or vulgar language) allowed on SE sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites). Do we",
"nonsense you curse you get warned policy or do we want to be",
"against the rules: [Are expletives (cursing, swear words or vulgar language) allowed on",
"of student teacher interaction. This answer has been flagged a number of times",
"SE, and may be against the rules: [Are expletives (cursing, swear words or",
"[Are expletives (cursing, swear words or vulgar language) allowed on SE sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites). Do",
"both expletives and suggests a pretty extreme form of student teacher interaction. This",
"[answer (only viewable to 10k+ users)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26842/how-to-deal-with-a-student-who-harasses-the-inexperienced-teacher-during-class/26887#26887) that uses both expletives and suggests a",
"you get warned policy or do we want to be a little more",
"the user. Expletives are not appreciated on SE, and may be against the",
"warned policy or do we want to be a little more relaxed? Are",
"policy or do we want to be a little more relaxed? Are extreme",
"sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites). Do we want a no nonsense you curse you get warned policy",
"curse you get warned policy or do we want to be a little",
"little more relaxed? Are extreme views that do not single out individuals or",
"user. Expletives are not appreciated on SE, and may be against the rules:",
"single out individuals or groups offensive and warrant the deletion of an answer?",
"of times as being offensive. The flags require the diamond mods to make",
"student teacher interaction. This answer has been flagged a number of times as",
"flags require the diamond mods to make a decision. We can do nothing,",
"offensive. The flags require the diamond mods to make a decision. We can",
"we want a no nonsense you curse you get warned policy or do",
"uses both expletives and suggests a pretty extreme form of student teacher interaction.",
"relaxed? Are extreme views that do not single out individuals or groups offensive",
"answer, or warn/suspend the user. Expletives are not appreciated on SE, and may",
"The flags require the diamond mods to make a decision. We can do",
"extreme views that do not single out individuals or groups offensive and warrant",
"are not appreciated on SE, and may be against the rules: [Are expletives",
"and may be against the rules: [Are expletives (cursing, swear words or vulgar",
"(only viewable to 10k+ users)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26842/how-to-deal-with-a-student-who-harasses-the-inexperienced-teacher-during-class/26887#26887) that uses both expletives and suggests a pretty",
"a decision. We can do nothing, delete the answer, or warn/suspend the user.",
"decision. We can do nothing, delete the answer, or warn/suspend the user. Expletives",
"we want to be a little more relaxed? Are extreme views that do",
"expletives and suggests a pretty extreme form of student teacher interaction. This answer",
"times as being offensive. The flags require the diamond mods to make a",
"There was an [answer (only viewable to 10k+ users)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26842/how-to-deal-with-a-student-who-harasses-the-inexperienced-teacher-during-class/26887#26887) that uses both expletives",
"extreme form of student teacher interaction. This answer has been flagged a number",
"Expletives are not appreciated on SE, and may be against the rules: [Are",
"or warn/suspend the user. Expletives are not appreciated on SE, and may be",
"to be a little more relaxed? Are extreme views that do not single",
"users)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26842/how-to-deal-with-a-student-who-harasses-the-inexperienced-teacher-during-class/26887#26887) that uses both expletives and suggests a pretty extreme form of student",
"that do not single out individuals or groups offensive and warrant the deletion",
"Are extreme views that do not single out individuals or groups offensive and",
"answer has been flagged a number of times as being offensive. The flags",
"get warned policy or do we want to be a little more relaxed?",
"views that do not single out individuals or groups offensive and warrant the",
"and suggests a pretty extreme form of student teacher interaction. This answer has",
"an [answer (only viewable to 10k+ users)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26842/how-to-deal-with-a-student-who-harasses-the-inexperienced-teacher-during-class/26887#26887) that uses both expletives and suggests",
"on SE, and may be against the rules: [Are expletives (cursing, swear words",
"mods to make a decision. We can do nothing, delete the answer, or",
"no nonsense you curse you get warned policy or do we want to",
"do not single out individuals or groups offensive and warrant the deletion of",
"want a no nonsense you curse you get warned policy or do we",
"swear words or vulgar language) allowed on SE sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites). Do we want a",
"nothing, delete the answer, or warn/suspend the user. Expletives are not appreciated on",
"the diamond mods to make a decision. We can do nothing, delete the",
"SE sites?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites). Do we want a no nonsense you curse you get warned",
"can do nothing, delete the answer, or warn/suspend the user. Expletives are not"
] |
[
"anyone know the font name?  Reference link: [Why aren't",
"know the font name?  Reference link: [Why aren't all",
"the font name?  Reference link: [Why aren't all research",
"Does anyone know the font name?  Reference link: [Why",
"name?  Reference link: [Why aren't all research articles on",
"font name?  Reference link: [Why aren't all research articles",
" Reference link: [Why aren't all research articles on PubMed?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9044/why-arent-all-research-articles-on-pubmed)"
] |
[
"> > **Shopping questions** asking for recommendations for specific programs and universities are",
"we get a lot of \"shopping questions\" that we have decided are off-topic,",
"off-topic on Academia.SE. > > > Note that we can only have 3",
"instance, we could have a reason such as: > > **Shopping questions** asking",
"they are \"cannot be generalized\", \"undergraduate\", and \"specific advice\". If you want a",
"are considered off-topic on Academia.SE. > > > Note that we can only",
"\"specific advice\". If you want a new reason, please also mention which reason",
"programs and universities are considered off-topic on Academia.SE. > > > Note that",
"we could have a reason such as: > > **Shopping questions** asking for",
"specific programs and universities are considered off-topic on Academia.SE. > > > Note",
"> Note that we can only have 3 custom off-topic close reasons, currently",
"you want a new reason, please also mention which reason it should replace/modify.",
"that we can only have 3 custom off-topic close reasons, currently they are",
"of \"shopping questions\" that we have decided are off-topic, should we create a",
"for specific programs and universities are considered off-topic on Academia.SE. > > >",
"have 3 custom off-topic close reasons, currently they are \"cannot be generalized\", \"undergraduate\",",
"we have decided are off-topic, should we create a custom off-topic close reason",
"that we have decided are off-topic, should we create a custom off-topic close",
"only have 3 custom off-topic close reasons, currently they are \"cannot be generalized\",",
"questions** asking for recommendations for specific programs and universities are considered off-topic on",
"advice\". If you want a new reason, please also mention which reason it",
"and \"specific advice\". If you want a new reason, please also mention which",
"reasons, currently they are \"cannot be generalized\", \"undergraduate\", and \"specific advice\". If you",
"should we create a custom off-topic close reason along those lines? For instance,",
"along those lines? For instance, we could have a reason such as: >",
"> > Note that we can only have 3 custom off-topic close reasons,",
"as: > > **Shopping questions** asking for recommendations for specific programs and universities",
"close reason along those lines? For instance, we could have a reason such",
"questions\" that we have decided are off-topic, should we create a custom off-topic",
"custom off-topic close reason along those lines? For instance, we could have a",
"> **Shopping questions** asking for recommendations for specific programs and universities are considered",
"a reason such as: > > **Shopping questions** asking for recommendations for specific",
"we can only have 3 custom off-topic close reasons, currently they are \"cannot",
"a custom off-topic close reason along those lines? For instance, we could have",
"reason along those lines? For instance, we could have a reason such as:",
"reason such as: > > **Shopping questions** asking for recommendations for specific programs",
"generalized\", \"undergraduate\", and \"specific advice\". If you want a new reason, please also",
"get a lot of \"shopping questions\" that we have decided are off-topic, should",
"can only have 3 custom off-topic close reasons, currently they are \"cannot be",
"asking for recommendations for specific programs and universities are considered off-topic on Academia.SE.",
"\"cannot be generalized\", \"undergraduate\", and \"specific advice\". If you want a new reason,",
"for recommendations for specific programs and universities are considered off-topic on Academia.SE. >",
"If you want a new reason, please also mention which reason it should",
"could have a reason such as: > > **Shopping questions** asking for recommendations",
"Given that we get a lot of \"shopping questions\" that we have decided",
"are \"cannot be generalized\", \"undergraduate\", and \"specific advice\". If you want a new",
"have a reason such as: > > **Shopping questions** asking for recommendations for",
"off-topic close reasons, currently they are \"cannot be generalized\", \"undergraduate\", and \"specific advice\".",
"custom off-topic close reasons, currently they are \"cannot be generalized\", \"undergraduate\", and \"specific",
"\"undergraduate\", and \"specific advice\". If you want a new reason, please also mention",
"> > > Note that we can only have 3 custom off-topic close",
"those lines? For instance, we could have a reason such as: > >",
"be generalized\", \"undergraduate\", and \"specific advice\". If you want a new reason, please",
"For instance, we could have a reason such as: > > **Shopping questions**",
"lines? For instance, we could have a reason such as: > > **Shopping",
"on Academia.SE. > > > Note that we can only have 3 custom",
"such as: > > **Shopping questions** asking for recommendations for specific programs and",
"create a custom off-topic close reason along those lines? For instance, we could",
"Note that we can only have 3 custom off-topic close reasons, currently they",
"Academia.SE. > > > Note that we can only have 3 custom off-topic",
"have decided are off-topic, should we create a custom off-topic close reason along",
"\"shopping questions\" that we have decided are off-topic, should we create a custom",
"off-topic, should we create a custom off-topic close reason along those lines? For",
"recommendations for specific programs and universities are considered off-topic on Academia.SE. > >",
"considered off-topic on Academia.SE. > > > Note that we can only have",
"3 custom off-topic close reasons, currently they are \"cannot be generalized\", \"undergraduate\", and",
"and universities are considered off-topic on Academia.SE. > > > Note that we",
"close reasons, currently they are \"cannot be generalized\", \"undergraduate\", and \"specific advice\". If",
"currently they are \"cannot be generalized\", \"undergraduate\", and \"specific advice\". If you want",
"decided are off-topic, should we create a custom off-topic close reason along those",
"that we get a lot of \"shopping questions\" that we have decided are",
"we create a custom off-topic close reason along those lines? For instance, we",
"a lot of \"shopping questions\" that we have decided are off-topic, should we",
"are off-topic, should we create a custom off-topic close reason along those lines?",
"universities are considered off-topic on Academia.SE. > > > Note that we can",
"lot of \"shopping questions\" that we have decided are off-topic, should we create",
"off-topic close reason along those lines? For instance, we could have a reason",
"**Shopping questions** asking for recommendations for specific programs and universities are considered off-topic"
] |
[
"alternative would be to explicitly define the \"advice\" tag as > > This",
"\"advice\" tag is not useful and should be deleted. One alternative would be",
"be tagged \"advice\" under this definition. However, I am afraid that many users",
"of the tag, we would be left with only a single valid instance.",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic) could be tagged \"advice\" under this definition. However, I am afraid that",
"> > > For instance, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic) could be tagged \"advice\" under this",
"the 17 questions currently tagged \"advice\", it seems like only the single one",
"tagged \"advice\", it seems like only the single one linked above asks for",
"questions are tagged \"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice), some aren't. I suggest that the \"advice\" tag is",
"and should be deleted. One alternative would be to explicitly define the \"advice\"",
"with \"advice\", i.e., that the tag will have a low signal-to-noise ratio. In",
"the \"advice\" tag as > > This is a question about **giving, requesting",
"with only a single valid instance. EDIT: And I would also propose deleting",
"> > This is a question about **giving, requesting or receiving** advice. >",
"would be left with only a single valid instance. EDIT: And I would",
"And I would also propose deleting the [personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice) tag, for exactly the same",
"one linked above asks for advice about giving advice, so after cleaning up",
"we would be left with only a single valid instance. EDIT: And I",
"above asks for advice about giving advice, so after cleaning up useless instances",
"am afraid that many users will nevertheless tag any request for advice with",
"single valid instance. EDIT: And I would also propose deleting the [personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice) tag,",
"after cleaning up useless instances of the tag, we would be left with",
"that many users will nevertheless tag any request for advice with \"advice\", i.e.,",
"I suggest that the \"advice\" tag is not useful and should be deleted.",
"deleting the [personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice) tag, for exactly the same reason. (Should I split this",
"as > > This is a question about **giving, requesting or receiving** advice.",
"nevertheless tag any request for advice with \"advice\", i.e., that the tag will",
"up useless instances of the tag, we would be left with only a",
"would also propose deleting the [personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice) tag, for exactly the same reason. (Should",
"advice with \"advice\", i.e., that the tag will have a low signal-to-noise ratio.",
"advice. [Some questions are tagged \"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice), some aren't. I suggest that the \"advice\"",
"giving advice, so after cleaning up useless instances of the tag, we would",
"the tag, we would be left with only a single valid instance. EDIT:",
"could be tagged \"advice\" under this definition. However, I am afraid that many",
"users will nevertheless tag any request for advice with \"advice\", i.e., that the",
"to explicitly define the \"advice\" tag as > > This is a question",
"about **giving, requesting or receiving** advice. > > > For instance, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic)",
"tag, for exactly the same reason. (Should I split this off into a",
"explicitly define the \"advice\" tag as > > This is a question about",
"[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic) could be tagged \"advice\" under this definition. However, I am afraid",
"only the single one linked above asks for advice about giving advice, so",
"exactly the same reason. (Should I split this off into a separate meta",
"some aren't. I suggest that the \"advice\" tag is not useful and should",
"currently tagged \"advice\", it seems like only the single one linked above asks",
"**giving, requesting or receiving** advice. > > > For instance, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic) could",
"question about **giving, requesting or receiving** advice. > > > For instance, [this",
"aren't. I suggest that the \"advice\" tag is not useful and should be",
"tag as > > This is a question about **giving, requesting or receiving**",
"In addition, out of the 17 questions currently tagged \"advice\", it seems like",
"single one linked above asks for advice about giving advice, so after cleaning",
"> > For instance, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic) could be tagged \"advice\" under this definition.",
"17 questions currently tagged \"advice\", it seems like only the single one linked",
"tag any request for advice with \"advice\", i.e., that the tag will have",
"deleted. One alternative would be to explicitly define the \"advice\" tag as >",
"advice about giving advice, so after cleaning up useless instances of the tag,",
"are tagged \"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice), some aren't. I suggest that the \"advice\" tag is not",
"is a question about **giving, requesting or receiving** advice. > > > For",
"all questions here ask about advice. [Some questions are tagged \"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice), some aren't.",
"afraid that many users will nevertheless tag any request for advice with \"advice\",",
"suggest that the \"advice\" tag is not useful and should be deleted. One",
"out of the 17 questions currently tagged \"advice\", it seems like only the",
"definition, almost all questions here ask about advice. [Some questions are tagged \"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice),",
"questions here ask about advice. [Some questions are tagged \"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice), some aren't. I",
"i.e., that the tag will have a low signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, out",
"should be deleted. One alternative would be to explicitly define the \"advice\" tag",
"[Some questions are tagged \"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice), some aren't. I suggest that the \"advice\" tag",
"any request for advice with \"advice\", i.e., that the tag will have a",
"addition, out of the 17 questions currently tagged \"advice\", it seems like only",
"be deleted. One alternative would be to explicitly define the \"advice\" tag as",
"cleaning up useless instances of the tag, we would be left with only",
"would be to explicitly define the \"advice\" tag as > > This is",
"the same reason. (Should I split this off into a separate meta question?)",
"a question about **giving, requesting or receiving** advice. > > > For instance,",
"requesting or receiving** advice. > > > For instance, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic) could be",
"like only the single one linked above asks for advice about giving advice,",
"\"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice), some aren't. I suggest that the \"advice\" tag is not useful and",
"However, I am afraid that many users will nevertheless tag any request for",
"questions currently tagged \"advice\", it seems like only the single one linked above",
"instance, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic) could be tagged \"advice\" under this definition. However, I am",
"the \"advice\" tag is not useful and should be deleted. One alternative would",
"advice. > > > For instance, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic) could be tagged \"advice\" under",
"that the tag will have a low signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, out of",
"will have a low signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, out of the 17 questions",
"for advice about giving advice, so after cleaning up useless instances of the",
"tag, we would be left with only a single valid instance. EDIT: And",
"request for advice with \"advice\", i.e., that the tag will have a low",
"\"advice\" under this definition. However, I am afraid that many users will nevertheless",
"receiving** advice. > > > For instance, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic) could be tagged \"advice\"",
"for exactly the same reason. (Should I split this off into a separate",
"> For instance, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic) could be tagged \"advice\" under this definition. However,",
"I am afraid that many users will nevertheless tag any request for advice",
"propose deleting the [personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice) tag, for exactly the same reason. (Should I split",
"useless instances of the tag, we would be left with only a single",
"about advice. [Some questions are tagged \"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice), some aren't. I suggest that the",
"ratio. In addition, out of the 17 questions currently tagged \"advice\", it seems",
"\"advice\", i.e., that the tag will have a low signal-to-noise ratio. In addition,",
"the single one linked above asks for advice about giving advice, so after",
"about giving advice, so after cleaning up useless instances of the tag, we",
"useful and should be deleted. One alternative would be to explicitly define the",
"instance. EDIT: And I would also propose deleting the [personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice) tag, for exactly",
"linked above asks for advice about giving advice, so after cleaning up useless",
"be left with only a single valid instance. EDIT: And I would also",
"\"advice\", it seems like only the single one linked above asks for advice",
"signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, out of the 17 questions currently tagged \"advice\", it",
"of the 17 questions currently tagged \"advice\", it seems like only the single",
"or receiving** advice. > > > For instance, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic) could be tagged",
"the [personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice) tag, for exactly the same reason. (Should I split this off",
"left with only a single valid instance. EDIT: And I would also propose",
"here ask about advice. [Some questions are tagged \"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice), some aren't. I suggest",
"tagged \"advice\" under this definition. However, I am afraid that many users will",
"many users will nevertheless tag any request for advice with \"advice\", i.e., that",
"be to explicitly define the \"advice\" tag as > > This is a",
"tagged \"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice), some aren't. I suggest that the \"advice\" tag is not useful",
"is not useful and should be deleted. One alternative would be to explicitly",
"it seems like only the single one linked above asks for advice about",
"will nevertheless tag any request for advice with \"advice\", i.e., that the tag",
"not useful and should be deleted. One alternative would be to explicitly define",
"define the \"advice\" tag as > > This is a question about **giving,",
"tag will have a low signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, out of the 17",
"that the \"advice\" tag is not useful and should be deleted. One alternative",
"\"advice\" tag as > > This is a question about **giving, requesting or",
"the tag will have a low signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, out of the",
"valid instance. EDIT: And I would also propose deleting the [personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice) tag, for",
"I would also propose deleting the [personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice) tag, for exactly the same reason.",
"[personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice) tag, for exactly the same reason. (Should I split this off into",
"also propose deleting the [personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice) tag, for exactly the same reason. (Should I",
"under this definition. However, I am afraid that many users will nevertheless tag",
"advice, so after cleaning up useless instances of the tag, we would be",
"only a single valid instance. EDIT: And I would also propose deleting the",
"definition. However, I am afraid that many users will nevertheless tag any request",
"This is a question about **giving, requesting or receiving** advice. > > >",
"seems like only the single one linked above asks for advice about giving",
"instances of the tag, we would be left with only a single valid",
"By definition, almost all questions here ask about advice. [Some questions are tagged",
"> This is a question about **giving, requesting or receiving** advice. > >",
"a low signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, out of the 17 questions currently tagged",
"One alternative would be to explicitly define the \"advice\" tag as > >",
"for advice with \"advice\", i.e., that the tag will have a low signal-to-noise",
"ask about advice. [Some questions are tagged \"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice), some aren't. I suggest that",
"have a low signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, out of the 17 questions currently",
"EDIT: And I would also propose deleting the [personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice) tag, for exactly the",
"asks for advice about giving advice, so after cleaning up useless instances of",
"almost all questions here ask about advice. [Some questions are tagged \"advice\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advice), some",
"For instance, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16436/how-to-advise-a-student-looking-for-an-under-grad-thesis-topic) could be tagged \"advice\" under this definition. However, I",
"low signal-to-noise ratio. In addition, out of the 17 questions currently tagged \"advice\",",
"so after cleaning up useless instances of the tag, we would be left",
"tag is not useful and should be deleted. One alternative would be to",
"this definition. However, I am afraid that many users will nevertheless tag any",
"a single valid instance. EDIT: And I would also propose deleting the [personal-advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-advice)"
] |
[
"question, as it is now, would be a perfect fit for that situation",
"answers. Now, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102) is more like a piece of advice, stating (again,",
"a close mind ...), and would be a good comment, but it's too",
"applies well to the particular situation of the OP (who is in high",
"attracted good answers. Now, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102) is more like a piece of advice,",
"general). In that regard, I believe it's a good question, that attracted good",
"the same time, it's very general, I don't see someone giving the advice",
"it's a good piece of advice). My question is the following one: **what",
"answer directly the question but can still be seen as interesting?** If we",
"whether there is a possibility to live from something he enjoys doing (and",
"Project Euler?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27659/do-mathematics-researchers-regularly-solve-problems-like-this) asks a very objective answer: is it possible to be a",
"(at least, in my opinion) to a 40 years old programmer who is",
"risk to become a discussion board, where everybody comes to share their own",
"good answers. Now, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102) is more like a piece of advice, stating",
"stating (again, summing up briefly) that one should keep an open mind, and",
"board, where everybody comes to share their own experience, and discuss the question",
"think it's a good piece of advice (but at the same time, it's",
"apply well (at least, in my opinion) to a 40 years old programmer",
"To be honest, I think it's a good piece of advice (but at",
"of keeping a close mind ...), and would be a good comment, but",
"we could lose some useful content. **EDIT** For that particular example, it's worth",
"programmer). To be honest, I think it's a good piece of advice (but",
"very objective answer: is it possible to be a professional researcher working on",
"voted several times (which is not surprising, it's a good piece of advice).",
"and would like to know whether there is a possibility to live from",
"**EDIT** For that particular example, it's worth mentioning that the advice applies well",
"live from something he enjoys doing (and the question, as it is now,",
"on topics similar to contest maths. There has been some good answers, stating",
"to know whether there is a possibility to live from something he enjoys",
"at the same time, it's very general, I don't see someone giving the",
"it possible to be a professional researcher working on topics similar to contest",
"For that particular example, it's worth mentioning that the advice applies well to",
"who is tired of his job, and would like to know whether there",
"instead of answering. If we forbid them, then we could lose some useful",
"critical thinking, citing a specific example of a programmer (even though the OP",
"but hard (since it's quite hard to be a professional mathematician in general).",
"close mind ...), and would be a good comment, but it's too long",
"we do with answers that do not answer directly the question but can",
"specific example of a programmer (even though the OP stated that he didn't",
"job, and would like to know whether there is a possibility to live",
"can still be seen as interesting?** If we allow them, then we take",
"In that regard, I believe it's a good question, that attracted good answers.",
"a comment. This answer has been up voted several times (which is not",
"a good question, that attracted good answers. Now, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102) is more like",
"use critical thinking, citing a specific example of a programmer (even though the",
"particular situation of the OP (who is in high school), but wouldn't apply",
"that one should keep an open mind, and that there are plenty of",
"a professional researcher working on topics similar to contest maths. There has been",
"we allow them, then we take the risk to become a discussion board,",
"advice (but at the same time, it's very general, I don't see someone",
"useful content. **EDIT** For that particular example, it's worth mentioning that the advice",
"possibility to live from something he enjoys doing (and the question, as it",
"be a professional mathematician in general). In that regard, I believe it's a",
"he didn't fancy becoming a professional programmer). To be honest, I think it's",
"some good answers, stating that (to sum up very briefly), it could be",
"be possible, but hard (since it's quite hard to be a professional mathematician",
"up voted several times (which is not surprising, it's a good piece of",
"would be a good comment, but it's too long to be a comment.",
"seen as interesting?** If we allow them, then we take the risk to",
"and discuss the question instead of answering. If we forbid them, then we",
"is a possibility to live from something he enjoys doing (and the question,",
"a possibility to live from something he enjoys doing (and the question, as",
"the ones from Project Euler?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27659/do-mathematics-researchers-regularly-solve-problems-like-this) asks a very objective answer: is it possible",
"like the ones from Project Euler?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27659/do-mathematics-researchers-regularly-solve-problems-like-this) asks a very objective answer: is it",
"becoming a professional programmer). To be honest, I think it's a good piece",
"high school), but wouldn't apply well (at least, in my opinion) to a",
"of jobs where you can use critical thinking, citing a specific example of",
"should we do with answers that do not answer directly the question but",
"comment. This answer has been up voted several times (which is not surprising,",
"is tired of his job, and would like to know whether there is",
"not surprising, it's a good piece of advice). My question is the following",
"question instead of answering. If we forbid them, then we could lose some",
"up briefly) that one should keep an open mind, and that there are",
"to contest maths. There has been some good answers, stating that (to sum",
"from Project Euler?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27659/do-mathematics-researchers-regularly-solve-problems-like-this) asks a very objective answer: is it possible to be",
"answers, stating that (to sum up very briefly), it could be possible, but",
"advice applies well to the particular situation of the OP (who is in",
"mentioning that the advice applies well to the particular situation of the OP",
"(and the question, as it is now, would be a perfect fit for",
"general, I don't see someone giving the advice of keeping a close mind",
"programmer (even though the OP stated that he didn't fancy becoming a professional",
"the OP stated that he didn't fancy becoming a professional programmer). To be",
"to live from something he enjoys doing (and the question, as it is",
"answer has been up voted several times (which is not surprising, it's a",
"then we could lose some useful content. **EDIT** For that particular example, it's",
"been up voted several times (which is not surprising, it's a good piece",
"open mind, and that there are plenty of jobs where you can use",
"answers that do not answer directly the question but can still be seen",
"stated that he didn't fancy becoming a professional programmer). To be honest, I",
"be seen as interesting?** If we allow them, then we take the risk",
"still be seen as interesting?** If we allow them, then we take the",
"share their own experience, and discuss the question instead of answering. If we",
"giving the advice of keeping a close mind ...), and would be a",
"ones from Project Euler?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27659/do-mathematics-researchers-regularly-solve-problems-like-this) asks a very objective answer: is it possible to",
"of his job, and would like to know whether there is a possibility",
"them, then we take the risk to become a discussion board, where everybody",
"the question, as it is now, would be a perfect fit for that",
"a specific example of a programmer (even though the OP stated that he",
"comes to share their own experience, and discuss the question instead of answering.",
"see someone giving the advice of keeping a close mind ...), and would",
"to be a professional researcher working on topics similar to contest maths. There",
"that attracted good answers. Now, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102) is more like a piece of",
"If we forbid them, then we could lose some useful content. **EDIT** For",
"regard, I believe it's a good question, that attracted good answers. Now, [this",
"them, then we could lose some useful content. **EDIT** For that particular example,",
"stating that (to sum up very briefly), it could be possible, but hard",
"possible, but hard (since it's quite hard to be a professional mathematician in",
"good piece of advice (but at the same time, it's very general, I",
"following one: **what should we do with answers that do not answer directly",
"a programmer (even though the OP stated that he didn't fancy becoming a",
"content. **EDIT** For that particular example, it's worth mentioning that the advice applies",
"the advice of keeping a close mind ...), and would be a good",
"same time, it's very general, I don't see someone giving the advice of",
"thinking, citing a specific example of a programmer (even though the OP stated",
"time, it's very general, I don't see someone giving the advice of keeping",
"There has been some good answers, stating that (to sum up very briefly),",
"a discussion board, where everybody comes to share their own experience, and discuss",
"the OP (who is in high school), but wouldn't apply well (at least,",
"a professional programmer). To be honest, I think it's a good piece of",
"of advice (but at the same time, it's very general, I don't see",
"comment, but it's too long to be a comment. This answer has been",
"(who is in high school), but wouldn't apply well (at least, in my",
"researchers regularly solve problems like the ones from Project Euler?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27659/do-mathematics-researchers-regularly-solve-problems-like-this) asks a very",
"to a 40 years old programmer who is tired of his job, and",
"My question is the following one: **what should we do with answers that",
"enjoys doing (and the question, as it is now, would be a perfect",
"to be a comment. This answer has been up voted several times (which",
"professional researcher working on topics similar to contest maths. There has been some",
"not answer directly the question but can still be seen as interesting?** If",
"is not surprising, it's a good piece of advice). My question is the",
"...), and would be a good comment, but it's too long to be",
"researcher working on topics similar to contest maths. There has been some good",
"particular example, it's worth mentioning that the advice applies well to the particular",
"professional mathematician in general). In that regard, I believe it's a good question,",
"[this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102) is more like a piece of advice, stating (again, summing up",
"could lose some useful content. **EDIT** For that particular example, it's worth mentioning",
"we forbid them, then we could lose some useful content. **EDIT** For that",
"good comment, but it's too long to be a comment. This answer has",
"forbid them, then we could lose some useful content. **EDIT** For that particular",
"in general). In that regard, I believe it's a good question, that attracted",
"one should keep an open mind, and that there are plenty of jobs",
"the question but can still be seen as interesting?** If we allow them,",
"discuss the question instead of answering. If we forbid them, then we could",
"good piece of advice). My question is the following one: **what should we",
"be a professional researcher working on topics similar to contest maths. There has",
"it's quite hard to be a professional mathematician in general). In that regard,",
"though the OP stated that he didn't fancy becoming a professional programmer). To",
"it's worth mentioning that the advice applies well to the particular situation of",
"do not answer directly the question but can still be seen as interesting?**",
"answering. If we forbid them, then we could lose some useful content. **EDIT**",
"professional programmer). To be honest, I think it's a good piece of advice",
"that he didn't fancy becoming a professional programmer). To be honest, I think",
"lose some useful content. **EDIT** For that particular example, it's worth mentioning that",
"interesting?** If we allow them, then we take the risk to become a",
"up very briefly), it could be possible, but hard (since it's quite hard",
"experience, and discuss the question instead of answering. If we forbid them, then",
"possible to be a professional researcher working on topics similar to contest maths.",
"from something he enjoys doing (and the question, as it is now, would",
"If we allow them, then we take the risk to become a discussion",
"piece of advice (but at the same time, it's very general, I don't",
"very general, I don't see someone giving the advice of keeping a close",
"the following one: **what should we do with answers that do not answer",
"could be possible, but hard (since it's quite hard to be a professional",
"it's a good question, that attracted good answers. Now, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102) is more",
"everybody comes to share their own experience, and discuss the question instead of",
"it's very general, I don't see someone giving the advice of keeping a",
"discussion board, where everybody comes to share their own experience, and discuss the",
"(even though the OP stated that he didn't fancy becoming a professional programmer).",
"asks a very objective answer: is it possible to be a professional researcher",
"citing a specific example of a programmer (even though the OP stated that",
"with answers that do not answer directly the question but can still be",
"maths. There has been some good answers, stating that (to sum up very",
"where you can use critical thinking, citing a specific example of a programmer",
"piece of advice). My question is the following one: **what should we do",
"where everybody comes to share their own experience, and discuss the question instead",
"as it is now, would be a perfect fit for that situation too).",
"are plenty of jobs where you can use critical thinking, citing a specific",
"do with answers that do not answer directly the question but can still",
"I think it's a good piece of advice (but at the same time,",
"in my opinion) to a 40 years old programmer who is tired of",
"of answering. If we forbid them, then we could lose some useful content.",
"something he enjoys doing (and the question, as it is now, would be",
"advice, stating (again, summing up briefly) that one should keep an open mind,",
"solve problems like the ones from Project Euler?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27659/do-mathematics-researchers-regularly-solve-problems-like-this) asks a very objective answer:",
"as interesting?** If we allow them, then we take the risk to become",
"mathematics researchers regularly solve problems like the ones from Project Euler?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27659/do-mathematics-researchers-regularly-solve-problems-like-this) asks a",
"hard (since it's quite hard to be a professional mathematician in general). In",
"OP stated that he didn't fancy becoming a professional programmer). To be honest,",
"(but at the same time, it's very general, I don't see someone giving",
"that particular example, it's worth mentioning that the advice applies well to the",
"the question instead of answering. If we forbid them, then we could lose",
"the particular situation of the OP (who is in high school), but wouldn't",
"piece of advice, stating (again, summing up briefly) that one should keep an",
"is the following one: **what should we do with answers that do not",
"to the particular situation of the OP (who is in high school), but",
"topics similar to contest maths. There has been some good answers, stating that",
"question, that attracted good answers. Now, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102) is more like a piece",
"a professional mathematician in general). In that regard, I believe it's a good",
"his job, and would like to know whether there is a possibility to",
"believe it's a good question, that attracted good answers. Now, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102) is",
"it's a good piece of advice (but at the same time, it's very",
"be a comment. This answer has been up voted several times (which is",
"[Do mathematics researchers regularly solve problems like the ones from Project Euler?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27659/do-mathematics-researchers-regularly-solve-problems-like-this) asks",
"mind, and that there are plenty of jobs where you can use critical",
"mind ...), and would be a good comment, but it's too long to",
"a 40 years old programmer who is tired of his job, and would",
"honest, I think it's a good piece of advice (but at the same",
"we take the risk to become a discussion board, where everybody comes to",
"someone giving the advice of keeping a close mind ...), and would be",
"**what should we do with answers that do not answer directly the question",
"would like to know whether there is a possibility to live from something",
"be honest, I think it's a good piece of advice (but at the",
"one: **what should we do with answers that do not answer directly the",
"of a programmer (even though the OP stated that he didn't fancy becoming",
"similar to contest maths. There has been some good answers, stating that (to",
"you can use critical thinking, citing a specific example of a programmer (even",
"summing up briefly) that one should keep an open mind, and that there",
"can use critical thinking, citing a specific example of a programmer (even though",
"own experience, and discuss the question instead of answering. If we forbid them,",
"hard to be a professional mathematician in general). In that regard, I believe",
"should keep an open mind, and that there are plenty of jobs where",
"too long to be a comment. This answer has been up voted several",
"but can still be seen as interesting?** If we allow them, then we",
"situation of the OP (who is in high school), but wouldn't apply well",
"doing (and the question, as it is now, would be a perfect fit",
"(again, summing up briefly) that one should keep an open mind, and that",
"I believe it's a good question, that attracted good answers. Now, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102)",
"years old programmer who is tired of his job, and would like to",
"and that there are plenty of jobs where you can use critical thinking,",
"least, in my opinion) to a 40 years old programmer who is tired",
"then we take the risk to become a discussion board, where everybody comes",
"to share their own experience, and discuss the question instead of answering. If",
"example, it's worth mentioning that the advice applies well to the particular situation",
"school), but wouldn't apply well (at least, in my opinion) to a 40",
"well to the particular situation of the OP (who is in high school),",
"working on topics similar to contest maths. There has been some good answers,",
"but it's too long to be a comment. This answer has been up",
"there are plenty of jobs where you can use critical thinking, citing a",
"question but can still be seen as interesting?** If we allow them, then",
"OP (who is in high school), but wouldn't apply well (at least, in",
"some useful content. **EDIT** For that particular example, it's worth mentioning that the",
"good question, that attracted good answers. Now, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102) is more like a",
"a good piece of advice (but at the same time, it's very general,",
"several times (which is not surprising, it's a good piece of advice). My",
"like a piece of advice, stating (again, summing up briefly) that one should",
"jobs where you can use critical thinking, citing a specific example of a",
"good answers, stating that (to sum up very briefly), it could be possible,",
"that do not answer directly the question but can still be seen as",
"(since it's quite hard to be a professional mathematician in general). In that",
"I don't see someone giving the advice of keeping a close mind ...),",
"that regard, I believe it's a good question, that attracted good answers. Now,",
"briefly), it could be possible, but hard (since it's quite hard to be",
"surprising, it's a good piece of advice). My question is the following one:",
"and would be a good comment, but it's too long to be a",
"old programmer who is tired of his job, and would like to know",
"of the OP (who is in high school), but wouldn't apply well (at",
"answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102) is more like a piece of advice, stating (again, summing up briefly)",
"keep an open mind, and that there are plenty of jobs where you",
"tired of his job, and would like to know whether there is a",
"regularly solve problems like the ones from Project Euler?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27659/do-mathematics-researchers-regularly-solve-problems-like-this) asks a very objective",
"their own experience, and discuss the question instead of answering. If we forbid",
"the advice applies well to the particular situation of the OP (who is",
"be a good comment, but it's too long to be a comment. This",
"to become a discussion board, where everybody comes to share their own experience,",
"of advice, stating (again, summing up briefly) that one should keep an open",
"advice). My question is the following one: **what should we do with answers",
"sum up very briefly), it could be possible, but hard (since it's quite",
"mathematician in general). In that regard, I believe it's a good question, that",
"problems like the ones from Project Euler?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27659/do-mathematics-researchers-regularly-solve-problems-like-this) asks a very objective answer: is",
"become a discussion board, where everybody comes to share their own experience, and",
"know whether there is a possibility to live from something he enjoys doing",
"but wouldn't apply well (at least, in my opinion) to a 40 years",
"keeping a close mind ...), and would be a good comment, but it's",
"has been some good answers, stating that (to sum up very briefly), it",
"40 years old programmer who is tired of his job, and would like",
"wouldn't apply well (at least, in my opinion) to a 40 years old",
"(which is not surprising, it's a good piece of advice). My question is",
"of advice). My question is the following one: **what should we do with",
"it could be possible, but hard (since it's quite hard to be a",
"(to sum up very briefly), it could be possible, but hard (since it's",
"contest maths. There has been some good answers, stating that (to sum up",
"the risk to become a discussion board, where everybody comes to share their",
"opinion) to a 40 years old programmer who is tired of his job,",
"This answer has been up voted several times (which is not surprising, it's",
"take the risk to become a discussion board, where everybody comes to share",
"it's too long to be a comment. This answer has been up voted",
"a piece of advice, stating (again, summing up briefly) that one should keep",
"a good piece of advice). My question is the following one: **what should",
"Euler?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27659/do-mathematics-researchers-regularly-solve-problems-like-this) asks a very objective answer: is it possible to be a professional",
"well (at least, in my opinion) to a 40 years old programmer who",
"in high school), but wouldn't apply well (at least, in my opinion) to",
"is it possible to be a professional researcher working on topics similar to",
"didn't fancy becoming a professional programmer). To be honest, I think it's a",
"fancy becoming a professional programmer). To be honest, I think it's a good",
"a very objective answer: is it possible to be a professional researcher working",
"is in high school), but wouldn't apply well (at least, in my opinion)",
"programmer who is tired of his job, and would like to know whether",
"advice of keeping a close mind ...), and would be a good comment,",
"to be a professional mathematician in general). In that regard, I believe it's",
"like to know whether there is a possibility to live from something he",
"has been up voted several times (which is not surprising, it's a good",
"very briefly), it could be possible, but hard (since it's quite hard to",
"that (to sum up very briefly), it could be possible, but hard (since",
"quite hard to be a professional mathematician in general). In that regard, I",
"long to be a comment. This answer has been up voted several times",
"he enjoys doing (and the question, as it is now, would be a",
"a good comment, but it's too long to be a comment. This answer",
"worth mentioning that the advice applies well to the particular situation of the",
"more like a piece of advice, stating (again, summing up briefly) that one",
"there is a possibility to live from something he enjoys doing (and the",
"that the advice applies well to the particular situation of the OP (who",
"briefly) that one should keep an open mind, and that there are plenty",
"example of a programmer (even though the OP stated that he didn't fancy",
"question is the following one: **what should we do with answers that do",
"is more like a piece of advice, stating (again, summing up briefly) that",
"answer: is it possible to be a professional researcher working on topics similar",
"been some good answers, stating that (to sum up very briefly), it could",
"Now, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/27685/102) is more like a piece of advice, stating (again, summing",
"directly the question but can still be seen as interesting?** If we allow",
"allow them, then we take the risk to become a discussion board, where",
"times (which is not surprising, it's a good piece of advice). My question",
"objective answer: is it possible to be a professional researcher working on topics",
"an open mind, and that there are plenty of jobs where you can",
"plenty of jobs where you can use critical thinking, citing a specific example",
"don't see someone giving the advice of keeping a close mind ...), and",
"my opinion) to a 40 years old programmer who is tired of his",
"that there are plenty of jobs where you can use critical thinking, citing"
] |
[
"[professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"). But given that a *huge* portion of questions",
"[phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\")? Can anyone offer specific guidelines on how to",
"specific guidelines on how to apply these and other very general tags so",
"questions tagged 'professors'\"). But given that a *huge* portion of questions on this",
"questions should be tagged with certain very general tags, such as [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show",
"clarify under what conditions questions should be tagged with certain very general tags,",
"a question about an authorship dispute between PhD students with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions",
"tagged 'university'\"). These tags convey meaningful information in certain situations; for example, it",
"setting, it seems to me that without very specific guidelines for applying these",
"[students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"). These tags",
"under what conditions questions should be tagged with certain very general tags, such",
"salaries with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"). But given that a *huge* portion",
"'professors'\"). But given that a *huge* portion of questions on this site involve",
"with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd",
"benefit to tagging a question about an authorship dispute between PhD students with",
"on this site involve students and/or professors doing something in a university setting,",
"be overused to the point of being meaningless. For example, is there any",
"'students'\"), and [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\")? Can anyone offer specific guidelines on",
"questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged",
"doing something in a university setting, it seems to me that without very",
"to clarify under what conditions questions should be tagged with certain very general",
"tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\")?",
"I would like to clarify under what conditions questions should be tagged with",
"is there any benefit to tagging a question about an authorship dispute between",
"to apply these and other very general tags so that they will be",
"and [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"). These tags convey meaningful information in certain",
"there any benefit to tagging a question about an authorship dispute between PhD",
"very general tags, such as [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions",
"should be tagged with certain very general tags, such as [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions",
"tags, such as [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"),",
"questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged",
"tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\").",
"for applying these tags, they have the potential to be overused to the",
"to tag a question about professors' salaries with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\").",
"like to clarify under what conditions questions should be tagged with certain very",
"But given that a *huge* portion of questions on this site involve students",
"questions on this site involve students and/or professors doing something in a university",
"questions tagged 'phd'\")? Can anyone offer specific guidelines on how to apply these",
"any benefit to tagging a question about an authorship dispute between PhD students",
"it makes sense to tag a question about professors' salaries with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show",
"PhD students with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"),",
"in certain situations; for example, it makes sense to tag a question about",
"in a university setting, it seems to me that without very specific guidelines",
"a university setting, it seems to me that without very specific guidelines for",
"authorship dispute between PhD students with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show",
"anyone offer specific guidelines on how to apply these and other very general",
"and [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\")? Can anyone offer specific guidelines on how",
"between PhD students with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged",
"site involve students and/or professors doing something in a university setting, it seems",
"what conditions questions should be tagged with certain very general tags, such as",
"guidelines for applying these tags, they have the potential to be overused to",
"'students'\"), and [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"). These tags convey meaningful information in",
"tags, they have the potential to be overused to the point of being",
"specific guidelines for applying these tags, they have the potential to be overused",
"[professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show",
"tagged 'professors'\"). But given that a *huge* portion of questions on this site",
"applying these tags, they have the potential to be overused to the point",
"point of being meaningless. For example, is there any benefit to tagging a",
"a question about professors' salaries with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"). But given",
"these tags, they have the potential to be overused to the point of",
"questions tagged 'students'\"), and [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"). These tags convey meaningful",
"that a *huge* portion of questions on this site involve students and/or professors",
"something in a university setting, it seems to me that without very specific",
"makes sense to tag a question about professors' salaries with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions",
"as [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university",
"information in certain situations; for example, it makes sense to tag a question",
"to tagging a question about an authorship dispute between PhD students with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors",
"a *huge* portion of questions on this site involve students and/or professors doing",
"Can anyone offer specific guidelines on how to apply these and other very",
"being meaningless. For example, is there any benefit to tagging a question about",
"professors' salaries with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"). But given that a *huge*",
"about an authorship dispute between PhD students with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"),",
"students with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and",
"conditions questions should be tagged with certain very general tags, such as [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors",
"'university'\"). These tags convey meaningful information in certain situations; for example, it makes",
"question about professors' salaries with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"). But given that",
"how to apply these and other very general tags so that they will",
"certain situations; for example, it makes sense to tag a question about professors'",
"\"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions",
"These tags convey meaningful information in certain situations; for example, it makes sense",
"an authorship dispute between PhD students with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students",
"professors doing something in a university setting, it seems to me that without",
"have the potential to be overused to the point of being meaningless. For",
"of being meaningless. For example, is there any benefit to tagging a question",
"with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"). But given that a *huge* portion of",
"[students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\")? Can anyone",
"sense to tag a question about professors' salaries with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged",
"\"show questions tagged 'phd'\")? Can anyone offer specific guidelines on how to apply",
"guidelines on how to apply these and other very general tags so that",
"it seems to me that without very specific guidelines for applying these tags,",
"tagging a question about an authorship dispute between PhD students with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show",
"be tagged with certain very general tags, such as [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged",
"For example, is there any benefit to tagging a question about an authorship",
"that without very specific guidelines for applying these tags, they have the potential",
"convey meaningful information in certain situations; for example, it makes sense to tag",
"*huge* portion of questions on this site involve students and/or professors doing something",
"university setting, it seems to me that without very specific guidelines for applying",
"this site involve students and/or professors doing something in a university setting, it",
"to me that without very specific guidelines for applying these tags, they have",
"tag a question about professors' salaries with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"). But",
"situations; for example, it makes sense to tag a question about professors' salaries",
"\"show questions tagged 'professors'\"). But given that a *huge* portion of questions on",
"general tags, such as [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged",
"very specific guidelines for applying these tags, they have the potential to be",
"question about an authorship dispute between PhD students with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged",
"such as [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and",
"[university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"). These tags convey meaningful information in certain situations;",
"apply these and other very general tags so that they will be useful?",
"the point of being meaningless. For example, is there any benefit to tagging",
"potential to be overused to the point of being meaningless. For example, is",
"example, is there any benefit to tagging a question about an authorship dispute",
"with certain very general tags, such as [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students",
"tagged 'students'\"), and [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\")? Can anyone offer specific guidelines",
"tagged 'students'\"), and [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"). These tags convey meaningful information",
"\"show questions tagged 'university'\"). These tags convey meaningful information in certain situations; for",
"would like to clarify under what conditions questions should be tagged with certain",
"portion of questions on this site involve students and/or professors doing something in",
"of questions on this site involve students and/or professors doing something in a",
"overused to the point of being meaningless. For example, is there any benefit",
"certain very general tags, such as [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show",
"me that without very specific guidelines for applying these tags, they have the",
"to be overused to the point of being meaningless. For example, is there",
"for example, it makes sense to tag a question about professors' salaries with",
"on how to apply these and other very general tags so that they",
"dispute between PhD students with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions",
"\"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\")? Can anyone offer",
"offer specific guidelines on how to apply these and other very general tags",
"they have the potential to be overused to the point of being meaningless.",
"seems to me that without very specific guidelines for applying these tags, they",
"tagged with certain very general tags, such as [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"),",
"questions tagged 'students'\"), and [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\")? Can anyone offer specific",
"meaningless. For example, is there any benefit to tagging a question about an",
"\"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions",
"tags convey meaningful information in certain situations; for example, it makes sense to",
"example, it makes sense to tag a question about professors' salaries with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors",
"given that a *huge* portion of questions on this site involve students and/or",
"[professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show",
"and/or professors doing something in a university setting, it seems to me that",
"\"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"). These tags convey",
"'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"). These",
"tagged 'phd'\")? Can anyone offer specific guidelines on how to apply these and",
"students and/or professors doing something in a university setting, it seems to me",
"'professors'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), and [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\")? Can",
"questions tagged 'university'\"). These tags convey meaningful information in certain situations; for example,",
"to the point of being meaningless. For example, is there any benefit to",
"about professors' salaries with [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"). But given that a",
"without very specific guidelines for applying these tags, they have the potential to",
"'phd'\")? Can anyone offer specific guidelines on how to apply these and other",
"the potential to be overused to the point of being meaningless. For example,",
"involve students and/or professors doing something in a university setting, it seems to",
"meaningful information in certain situations; for example, it makes sense to tag a"
] |
[
"to the site. With your help, we're working together to build a library",
"we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question",
"of detailed answers to every question about academia. Much like academia itself, Academia.SE",
"single* piece of advice per answer. If you have multiple pieces of advice,",
"post multiple answers. This is so that the community can vote separately on",
"Academia.SE has some conventions and standards of behavior that can be unfamiliar to",
"some conventions and standards of behavior that can be unfamiliar to new members",
"to help you get acclimated and to make your interactions with this site",
"an answer to this post: Please answer with *one single* piece of advice",
"to senior researchers - as well as anyone in or interested in research-related",
"your interactions with this site a pleasant experience for you and all other",
"find some information to help you get acclimated and to make your interactions",
"information to help you get acclimated and to make your interactions with this",
"itself, Academia.SE has some conventions and standards of behavior that can be unfamiliar",
"interesting, and fun, and we welcome your contributions to the site. With your",
"advice, post multiple answers. This is so that the community can vote separately",
"welcome your contributions to the site. With your help, we're working together to",
"working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about",
"--- If you're adding an answer to this post: Please answer with *one",
"we welcome your contributions to the site. With your help, we're working together",
"detailed answers to every question about academia. Much like academia itself, Academia.SE has",
"all other users. --- If you're adding an answer to this post: Please",
"If you're adding an answer to this post: Please answer with *one single*",
"multiple answers. This is so that the community can vote separately on each",
"has some conventions and standards of behavior that can be unfamiliar to new",
"for you and all other users. --- If you're adding an answer to",
"With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers",
"answer to this post: Please answer with *one single* piece of advice per",
"research-adjacent fields We hope you find Academia.SE enjoyable, interesting, and fun, and we",
"library of detailed answers to every question about academia. Much like academia itself,",
"academia. Much like academia itself, Academia.SE has some conventions and standards of behavior",
"that the community can vote separately on each item, and the most important",
"every question about academia. Much like academia itself, Academia.SE has some conventions and",
"the community. Below, you'll find some information to help you get acclimated and",
"Welcome to Academia.SE, the free, community-driven Questions and Answers site for academics of",
"for academics of all levels - from aspiring graduate and professional students to",
"you and all other users. --- If you're adding an answer to this",
"your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to",
"be unfamiliar to new members of the community. Below, you'll find some information",
"to Academia.SE, the free, community-driven Questions and Answers site for academics of all",
"users. --- If you're adding an answer to this post: Please answer with",
"of advice per answer. If you have multiple pieces of advice, post multiple",
"and professional students to senior researchers - as well as anyone in or",
"answers. This is so that the community can vote separately on each item,",
"help you get acclimated and to make your interactions with this site a",
"to make your interactions with this site a pleasant experience for you and",
"this post: Please answer with *one single* piece of advice per answer. If",
"Questions and Answers site for academics of all levels - from aspiring graduate",
"as anyone in or interested in research-related or research-adjacent fields We hope you",
"experience for you and all other users. --- If you're adding an answer",
"to this post: Please answer with *one single* piece of advice per answer.",
"from aspiring graduate and professional students to senior researchers - as well as",
"members of the community. Below, you'll find some information to help you get",
"site. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed",
"site for academics of all levels - from aspiring graduate and professional students",
"as well as anyone in or interested in research-related or research-adjacent fields We",
"about academia. Much like academia itself, Academia.SE has some conventions and standards of",
"pieces of advice, post multiple answers. This is so that the community can",
"of behavior that can be unfamiliar to new members of the community. Below,",
"site a pleasant experience for you and all other users. --- If you're",
"you have multiple pieces of advice, post multiple answers. This is so that",
"adding an answer to this post: Please answer with *one single* piece of",
"vote separately on each item, and the most important advice will rise to",
"hope you find Academia.SE enjoyable, interesting, and fun, and we welcome your contributions",
"question about academia. Much like academia itself, Academia.SE has some conventions and standards",
"or research-adjacent fields We hope you find Academia.SE enjoyable, interesting, and fun, and",
"students to senior researchers - as well as anyone in or interested in",
"with this site a pleasant experience for you and all other users. ---",
"other users. --- If you're adding an answer to this post: Please answer",
"post: Please answer with *one single* piece of advice per answer. If you",
"so that the community can vote separately on each item, and the most",
"senior researchers - as well as anyone in or interested in research-related or",
"or interested in research-related or research-adjacent fields We hope you find Academia.SE enjoyable,",
"acclimated and to make your interactions with this site a pleasant experience for",
"to every question about academia. Much like academia itself, Academia.SE has some conventions",
"and standards of behavior that can be unfamiliar to new members of the",
"unfamiliar to new members of the community. Below, you'll find some information to",
"per answer. If you have multiple pieces of advice, post multiple answers. This",
"in or interested in research-related or research-adjacent fields We hope you find Academia.SE",
"make your interactions with this site a pleasant experience for you and all",
"anyone in or interested in research-related or research-adjacent fields We hope you find",
"to build a library of detailed answers to every question about academia. Much",
"free, community-driven Questions and Answers site for academics of all levels - from",
"- as well as anyone in or interested in research-related or research-adjacent fields",
"you get acclimated and to make your interactions with this site a pleasant",
"you're adding an answer to this post: Please answer with *one single* piece",
"can be unfamiliar to new members of the community. Below, you'll find some",
"This is so that the community can vote separately on each item, and",
"contributions to the site. With your help, we're working together to build a",
"We hope you find Academia.SE enjoyable, interesting, and fun, and we welcome your",
"professional students to senior researchers - as well as anyone in or interested",
"get acclimated and to make your interactions with this site a pleasant experience",
"and to make your interactions with this site a pleasant experience for you",
"fields We hope you find Academia.SE enjoyable, interesting, and fun, and we welcome",
"and we welcome your contributions to the site. With your help, we're working",
"on each item, and the most important advice will rise to the top.",
"Below, you'll find some information to help you get acclimated and to make",
"enjoyable, interesting, and fun, and we welcome your contributions to the site. With",
"interested in research-related or research-adjacent fields We hope you find Academia.SE enjoyable, interesting,",
"can vote separately on each item, and the most important advice will rise",
"Answers site for academics of all levels - from aspiring graduate and professional",
"the site. With your help, we're working together to build a library of",
"of all levels - from aspiring graduate and professional students to senior researchers",
"conventions and standards of behavior that can be unfamiliar to new members of",
"all levels - from aspiring graduate and professional students to senior researchers -",
"the community can vote separately on each item, and the most important advice",
"behavior that can be unfamiliar to new members of the community. Below, you'll",
"of the community. Below, you'll find some information to help you get acclimated",
"together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about academia.",
"have multiple pieces of advice, post multiple answers. This is so that the",
"and Answers site for academics of all levels - from aspiring graduate and",
"find Academia.SE enjoyable, interesting, and fun, and we welcome your contributions to the",
"a pleasant experience for you and all other users. --- If you're adding",
"levels - from aspiring graduate and professional students to senior researchers - as",
"some information to help you get acclimated and to make your interactions with",
"is so that the community can vote separately on each item, and the",
"If you have multiple pieces of advice, post multiple answers. This is so",
"in research-related or research-adjacent fields We hope you find Academia.SE enjoyable, interesting, and",
"this site a pleasant experience for you and all other users. --- If",
"you'll find some information to help you get acclimated and to make your",
"answer. If you have multiple pieces of advice, post multiple answers. This is",
"build a library of detailed answers to every question about academia. Much like",
"standards of behavior that can be unfamiliar to new members of the community.",
"and fun, and we welcome your contributions to the site. With your help,",
"aspiring graduate and professional students to senior researchers - as well as anyone",
"well as anyone in or interested in research-related or research-adjacent fields We hope",
"separately on each item, and the most important advice will rise to the",
"and all other users. --- If you're adding an answer to this post:",
"with *one single* piece of advice per answer. If you have multiple pieces",
"- from aspiring graduate and professional students to senior researchers - as well",
"Please answer with *one single* piece of advice per answer. If you have",
"piece of advice per answer. If you have multiple pieces of advice, post",
"academics of all levels - from aspiring graduate and professional students to senior",
"answer with *one single* piece of advice per answer. If you have multiple",
"the free, community-driven Questions and Answers site for academics of all levels -",
"interactions with this site a pleasant experience for you and all other users.",
"of advice, post multiple answers. This is so that the community can vote",
"a library of detailed answers to every question about academia. Much like academia",
"research-related or research-adjacent fields We hope you find Academia.SE enjoyable, interesting, and fun,",
"your contributions to the site. With your help, we're working together to build",
"Academia.SE, the free, community-driven Questions and Answers site for academics of all levels",
"answers to every question about academia. Much like academia itself, Academia.SE has some",
"fun, and we welcome your contributions to the site. With your help, we're",
"that can be unfamiliar to new members of the community. Below, you'll find",
"graduate and professional students to senior researchers - as well as anyone in",
"*one single* piece of advice per answer. If you have multiple pieces of",
"Academia.SE enjoyable, interesting, and fun, and we welcome your contributions to the site.",
"community. Below, you'll find some information to help you get acclimated and to",
"to new members of the community. Below, you'll find some information to help",
"new members of the community. Below, you'll find some information to help you",
"academia itself, Academia.SE has some conventions and standards of behavior that can be",
"you find Academia.SE enjoyable, interesting, and fun, and we welcome your contributions to",
"community-driven Questions and Answers site for academics of all levels - from aspiring",
"like academia itself, Academia.SE has some conventions and standards of behavior that can",
"community can vote separately on each item, and the most important advice will",
"researchers - as well as anyone in or interested in research-related or research-adjacent",
"pleasant experience for you and all other users. --- If you're adding an",
"advice per answer. If you have multiple pieces of advice, post multiple answers.",
"Much like academia itself, Academia.SE has some conventions and standards of behavior that",
"multiple pieces of advice, post multiple answers. This is so that the community",
"help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every"
] |
[
"> > > The claim is that it does not provide an answer",
"in my best interest not to submit a paper to two journals simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous)",
"simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous) was deleted by a moderator: > > > > > > What",
"> > > > > > What can I lose if I don’t",
"> > The claim is that it does not provide an answer to",
"deleted by a moderator: > > > > > > What can I",
"[How is it in my best interest not to submit a paper to",
"that it does not provide an answer to the question. It clearly does",
"submit a paper to two journals simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous) was deleted by a moderator: >",
"lose if I don’t adhere to this rule? > > > > >",
"not provide an answer to the question. It clearly does provide an answer.",
"to [How is it in my best interest not to submit a paper",
"> > > > > Your self-respect. > > > The claim is",
"> > Your self-respect. > > > The claim is that it does",
"> > > Your self-respect. > > > The claim is that it",
"to this rule? > > > > > > > > > Your",
"is that it does not provide an answer to the question. It clearly",
"> > > > Your self-respect. > > > The claim is that",
"journals simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous) was deleted by a moderator: > > > > > >",
"was deleted by a moderator: > > > > > > What can",
"> What can I lose if I don’t adhere to this rule? >",
"> > > > > What can I lose if I don’t adhere",
"it in my best interest not to submit a paper to two journals",
"> Your self-respect. > > > The claim is that it does not",
"it does not provide an answer to the question. It clearly does provide",
"to two journals simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous) was deleted by a moderator: > > > >",
"I lose if I don’t adhere to this rule? > > > >",
"paper to two journals simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous) was deleted by a moderator: > > >",
"> > > > > > > Your self-respect. > > > The",
"[This answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/28101/81) to [How is it in my best interest not to submit",
"I don’t adhere to this rule? > > > > > > >",
"best interest not to submit a paper to two journals simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous) was deleted",
"to submit a paper to two journals simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous) was deleted by a moderator:",
"> > > > > > > > Your self-respect. > > >",
"Your self-respect. > > > The claim is that it does not provide",
"if I don’t adhere to this rule? > > > > > >",
"a paper to two journals simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous) was deleted by a moderator: > >",
"moderator: > > > > > > What can I lose if I",
"rule? > > > > > > > > > Your self-respect. >",
"adhere to this rule? > > > > > > > > >",
"does not provide an answer to the question. It clearly does provide an",
"is it in my best interest not to submit a paper to two",
"can I lose if I don’t adhere to this rule? > > >",
"> > > > What can I lose if I don’t adhere to",
"What can I lose if I don’t adhere to this rule? > >",
"> > > > > > Your self-respect. > > > The claim",
"self-respect. > > > The claim is that it does not provide an",
"a moderator: > > > > > > What can I lose if",
"The claim is that it does not provide an answer to the question.",
"answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/28101/81) to [How is it in my best interest not to submit a",
"claim is that it does not provide an answer to the question. It",
"my best interest not to submit a paper to two journals simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous) was",
"> > > What can I lose if I don’t adhere to this",
"interest not to submit a paper to two journals simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous) was deleted by",
"two journals simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous) was deleted by a moderator: > > > > >",
"by a moderator: > > > > > > What can I lose",
"> The claim is that it does not provide an answer to the",
"don’t adhere to this rule? > > > > > > > >",
"not to submit a paper to two journals simultaneously?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28086/how-is-it-in-my-best-interest-not-to-submit-a-paper-to-two-journals-simultaneous) was deleted by a",
"this rule? > > > > > > > > > Your self-respect.",
"> > > > > > > > > Your self-respect. > >",
"> > What can I lose if I don’t adhere to this rule?"
] |
[
"synonym and I think politics and political-sciences should merged and the difference of",
"questions > > On standards or conventions specific to political science as an",
"list and came to the following ones with excerpts as: [political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science \"show questions",
"standards or conventions specific to political science as an academic >discipline, and programs",
"to be synonym and I think politics and political-sciences should merged and the",
"to the following ones with excerpts as: [political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science \"show questions tagged 'political-science'\") with",
"should merged and the difference of them and the law tag should be",
"questions tagged 'law'\") with 11 questions > > Academic questions and answers about",
"> On standards or conventions specific to political science as an academic >discipline,",
"politics and political-sciences should merged and the difference of them and the law",
"the following ones with excerpts as: [political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science \"show questions tagged 'political-science'\") with 4",
"as an academic >discipline, and programs that lead to a degree in this",
"> [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") with 11 questions > > Academic questions",
"no tag excerpt or wiki. All these tags seem to be synonym and",
"or conventions specific to political science as an academic >discipline, and programs that",
"political science as an academic >discipline, and programs that lead to a degree",
"and the difference of them and the law tag should be declared more",
"law and political sciences. > > > [politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics \"show questions tagged 'politics'\") with",
"questions this tag has no tag excerpt or wiki. All these tags seem",
"'politics'\") with 3 questions this tag has no tag excerpt or wiki. All",
"should be declared more or this also should be merged into the previous",
"an academic >discipline, and programs that lead to a degree in this field.",
"degree in this field. > > > [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") with",
"and the law tag should be declared more or this also should be",
"this field. > > > [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") with 11 questions",
"'law'\") with 11 questions > > Academic questions and answers about law and",
"Academic questions and answers about law and political sciences. > > > [politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics",
"was reviewing the tags list and came to the following ones with excerpts",
"following ones with excerpts as: [political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science \"show questions tagged 'political-science'\") with 4 questions",
"be synonym and I think politics and political-sciences should merged and the difference",
"that lead to a degree in this field. > > > [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show",
"these tags seem to be synonym and I think politics and political-sciences should",
"wiki. All these tags seem to be synonym and I think politics and",
"the tags list and came to the following ones with excerpts as: [political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science",
"and programs that lead to a degree in this field. > > >",
"11 questions > > Academic questions and answers about law and political sciences.",
"questions tagged 'politics'\") with 3 questions this tag has no tag excerpt or",
"tagged 'politics'\") with 3 questions this tag has no tag excerpt or wiki.",
"has no tag excerpt or wiki. All these tags seem to be synonym",
"tagged 'political-science'\") with 4 questions > > On standards or conventions specific to",
"'political-science'\") with 4 questions > > On standards or conventions specific to political",
"a degree in this field. > > > [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\")",
"answers about law and political sciences. > > > [politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics \"show questions tagged",
"\"show questions tagged 'politics'\") with 3 questions this tag has no tag excerpt",
"sciences. > > > [politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics \"show questions tagged 'politics'\") with 3 questions this",
"and I think politics and political-sciences should merged and the difference of them",
"seem to be synonym and I think politics and political-sciences should merged and",
"them and the law tag should be declared more or this also should",
"academic >discipline, and programs that lead to a degree in this field. >",
"\"show questions tagged 'political-science'\") with 4 questions > > On standards or conventions",
"> > [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") with 11 questions > > Academic",
"be declared more or this also should be merged into the previous ones.",
"> > On standards or conventions specific to political science as an academic",
"and answers about law and political sciences. > > > [politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics \"show questions",
"tag has no tag excerpt or wiki. All these tags seem to be",
"[law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") with 11 questions > > Academic questions and",
"reviewing the tags list and came to the following ones with excerpts as:",
"of them and the law tag should be declared more or this also",
"law tag should be declared more or this also should be merged into",
"to political science as an academic >discipline, and programs that lead to a",
"3 questions this tag has no tag excerpt or wiki. All these tags",
"field. > > > [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") with 11 questions >",
"> > > [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") with 11 questions > >",
"specific to political science as an academic >discipline, and programs that lead to",
"the difference of them and the law tag should be declared more or",
"excerpts as: [political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science \"show questions tagged 'political-science'\") with 4 questions > > On",
"and political sciences. > > > [politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics \"show questions tagged 'politics'\") with 3",
"tags seem to be synonym and I think politics and political-sciences should merged",
"difference of them and the law tag should be declared more or this",
"> > Academic questions and answers about law and political sciences. > >",
"about law and political sciences. > > > [politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics \"show questions tagged 'politics'\")",
"merged and the difference of them and the law tag should be declared",
"I was reviewing the tags list and came to the following ones with",
"questions and answers about law and political sciences. > > > [politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics \"show",
"tags list and came to the following ones with excerpts as: [political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science \"show",
"All these tags seem to be synonym and I think politics and political-sciences",
"with 11 questions > > Academic questions and answers about law and political",
"and came to the following ones with excerpts as: [political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science \"show questions tagged",
"[political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science \"show questions tagged 'political-science'\") with 4 questions > > On standards or",
"with excerpts as: [political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science \"show questions tagged 'political-science'\") with 4 questions > >",
"to a degree in this field. > > > [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged",
"in this field. > > > [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") with 11",
">discipline, and programs that lead to a degree in this field. > >",
"the law tag should be declared more or this also should be merged",
"I think politics and political-sciences should merged and the difference of them and",
"> > > [politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics \"show questions tagged 'politics'\") with 3 questions this tag",
"and political-sciences should merged and the difference of them and the law tag",
"> Academic questions and answers about law and political sciences. > > >",
"this tag has no tag excerpt or wiki. All these tags seem to",
"with 4 questions > > On standards or conventions specific to political science",
"ones with excerpts as: [political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science \"show questions tagged 'political-science'\") with 4 questions >",
"\"show questions tagged 'law'\") with 11 questions > > Academic questions and answers",
"think politics and political-sciences should merged and the difference of them and the",
"On standards or conventions specific to political science as an academic >discipline, and",
"conventions specific to political science as an academic >discipline, and programs that lead",
"> [politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics \"show questions tagged 'politics'\") with 3 questions this tag has no",
"science as an academic >discipline, and programs that lead to a degree in",
"lead to a degree in this field. > > > [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions",
"with 3 questions this tag has no tag excerpt or wiki. All these",
"political sciences. > > > [politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics \"show questions tagged 'politics'\") with 3 questions",
"questions tagged 'political-science'\") with 4 questions > > On standards or conventions specific",
"programs that lead to a degree in this field. > > > [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law",
"political-sciences should merged and the difference of them and the law tag should",
"excerpt or wiki. All these tags seem to be synonym and I think",
"tag excerpt or wiki. All these tags seem to be synonym and I",
"> > [politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics \"show questions tagged 'politics'\") with 3 questions this tag has",
"4 questions > > On standards or conventions specific to political science as",
"[politics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/politics \"show questions tagged 'politics'\") with 3 questions this tag has no tag",
"questions > > Academic questions and answers about law and political sciences. >",
"as: [political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science \"show questions tagged 'political-science'\") with 4 questions > > On standards",
"came to the following ones with excerpts as: [political-science](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/political-science \"show questions tagged 'political-science'\")",
"tagged 'law'\") with 11 questions > > Academic questions and answers about law",
"tag should be declared more or this also should be merged into the",
"or wiki. All these tags seem to be synonym and I think politics"
] |
[
"as *voting once in the close direction*. If it does, this means that",
"it becomes necessary. Given that we currently have [fewer than 50 active users",
"they have several negative consequences: * In many cases, it [causes the question",
"a university for me\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401) * [this edit of a programming question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions) (Not",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714) * [this suggested edit to a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606) * [this suggested edit",
"that are closed for being off-topic be edited for formatting, grammar, retagging, or",
"reason for rejecting suggested edits? The argument against these edits is that they",
"* [this suggested edit of a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714) * [this suggested edit to",
"[only vote once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) in each direction (close, reopen) on any question. It's [not",
"motivation to help out with reviews. * ~~Users can [only vote once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) in",
"closure has been resolved. I am especially thinking of edits to posts that",
"If the user proposing the edit does not have enough reputation to apply",
"that they may turn out to be useful if the question is also,",
"these formatting, grammar, or other edits *only after* the issue that led to",
"question is also, separately, edited to make it on-topic, and it is then",
"also, separately, edited to make it on-topic, and it is then reopened. However,",
"these edits is that they have several negative consequences: * In many cases,",
"users are prevented from voting to close this question again if it becomes",
"we currently have [fewer than 50 active users who can cast these votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533),",
"for being off-topic be edited for formatting, grammar, retagging, or other issues that",
"suggested edit of a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714) * [this suggested edit to a shopping",
"posts to the front page. If the edit makes the question a candidate",
"a candidate for reopening, that's a good thing. But if not, it looks",
"be useful if the question is also, separately, edited to make it on-topic,",
"edit of a programming question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions) (Not suggesting that users who made these edits",
"pushed into the reopen review queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue). The edit didn't help resolve the issue",
"(since the question doesn't *really* need a review for reopening at this point).",
"the edit does not have enough reputation to apply edits unilaterally, then it",
"Given that we currently have [fewer than 50 active users who can cast",
"questions that are going to be deleted, anyways. * Edits bump these posts",
"these edits is that they may turn out to be useful if the",
"It's [not clear to me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire) whether \"Leave Closed\" votes in the reopen review",
"not likely to be reopened because they are shopping questions or one of",
"have several negative consequences: * In many cases, it [causes the question to",
"votes in the reopen review queue count as *voting once in the close",
"the question was closed? Is this a valid reason for rejecting suggested edits?",
"edits *only after* the issue that led to the closure has been resolved.",
"are not likely to be reopened because they are shopping questions or one",
"becomes necessary. Given that we currently have [fewer than 50 active users who",
"Should questions that are closed for being off-topic be edited for formatting, grammar,",
"edits unilaterally, then it will go into the suggested edits review queue. This",
"on-topic, and it is then reopened. However, it seems to me that it",
"are closed for being off-topic be edited for formatting, grammar, retagging, or other",
"were doing anything wrong, since until now we have *not* had a site",
"this means that by unnecessarily reviewing a question following edits that don't resolve",
"grammar, retagging, or other issues that don't resolve the reason the question was",
"rather not bump these if we can avoid it. The argument in favor",
"I am especially thinking of edits to posts that are not likely to",
"off-topic questions on the front page; I'd rather not bump these if we",
"this point). Having unnecessary reviews in the queue can decrease users' motivation to",
"to me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire) whether \"Leave Closed\" votes in the reopen review queue count as",
"If the edit makes the question a candidate for reopening, that's a good",
"unilaterally, then it will go into the suggested edits review queue. This is",
"bad to have many closed off-topic questions on the front page; I'd rather",
"for closure, users are prevented from voting to close this question again if",
"edits is that they have several negative consequences: * In many cases, it",
"vote once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) in each direction (close, reopen) on any question. It's [not clear",
"the front page. If the edit makes the question a candidate for reopening,",
"concern.~~ * If the user proposing the edit does not have enough reputation",
"bump these if we can avoid it. The argument in favor of these",
"am especially thinking of edits to posts that are not likely to be",
"then reopened. However, it seems to me that it might be preferable to",
"the reason the question was closed? Is this a valid reason for rejecting",
"count as *voting once in the close direction*. If it does, this means",
"resolve the issue that caused the question to be closed as off-topic. So,",
"have many closed off-topic questions on the front page; I'd rather not bump",
"to me that it might be preferable to do these formatting, grammar, or",
"to help out with reviews. * ~~Users can [only vote once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) in each",
"a valid reason for rejecting suggested edits? The argument against these edits is",
"a \"Choose a university for me\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401) * [this edit of a programming",
"close direction*. If it does, this means that by unnecessarily reviewing a question",
"will go into the suggested edits review queue. This is also demoralizing to",
"to a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606) * [this suggested edit to a \"Choose a university",
"edit didn't help resolve the issue that caused the question to be closed",
"question following edits that don't resolve the reason for closure, users are prevented",
"suggested edits? The argument against these edits is that they have several negative",
"the question to be pushed into the reopen review queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue). The edit didn't",
"this is a cause for concern.~~ * If the user proposing the edit",
"wrong, since until now we have *not* had a site policy on the",
"But if not, it looks bad to have many closed off-topic questions on",
"a programming question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions) (Not suggesting that users who made these edits were doing",
"* ~~Users can [only vote once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) in each direction (close, reopen) on any",
"reopened. However, it seems to me that it might be preferable to do",
"[this suggested edit to a \"Choose a university for me\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401) * [this",
"waste of effort for questions that are going to be deleted, anyways. *",
"off topic questions listed in the help center. For example, * [this suggested",
"it on-topic, and it is then reopened. However, it seems to me that",
"retagging, or other issues that don't resolve the reason the question was closed?",
"a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714) * [this suggested edit to a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606) * [this",
"front page. If the edit makes the question a candidate for reopening, that's",
"closed for being off-topic be edited for formatting, grammar, retagging, or other issues",
"it might be preferable to do these formatting, grammar, or other edits *only",
"reopen) on any question. It's [not clear to me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire) whether \"Leave Closed\" votes",
"likely to be reopened because they are shopping questions or one of the",
"preferable to do these formatting, grammar, or other edits *only after* the issue",
"makes the question a candidate for reopening, that's a good thing. But if",
"be pushed into the reopen review queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue). The edit didn't help resolve the",
"* [this suggested edit to a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606) * [this suggested edit to",
"users who made these edits were doing anything wrong, since until now we",
"So, this creates unnecessary work for reviewers (since the question doesn't *really* need",
"*really* need a review for reopening at this point). Having unnecessary reviews in",
"to be reopened because they are shopping questions or one of the other",
"the other off topic questions listed in the help center. For example, *",
"that it might be preferable to do these formatting, grammar, or other edits",
"the reopen review queue count as *voting once in the close direction*. If",
"that are going to be deleted, anyways. * Edits bump these posts to",
"off-topic. So, this creates unnecessary work for reviewers (since the question doesn't *really*",
"the question is also, separately, edited to make it on-topic, and it is",
"being off-topic be edited for formatting, grammar, retagging, or other issues that don't",
"front page; I'd rather not bump these if we can avoid it. The",
"direction*. If it does, this means that by unnecessarily reviewing a question following",
"to do these formatting, grammar, or other edits *only after* the issue that",
"* Edits bump these posts to the front page. If the edit makes",
"edit of a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714) * [this suggested edit to a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606)",
"* [this suggested edit to a \"Choose a university for me\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401) *",
"seems to me that it might be preferable to do these formatting, grammar,",
"several negative consequences: * In many cases, it [causes the question to be",
"cast these votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533), this is a cause for concern.~~ * If the user",
"rejecting suggested edits? The argument against these edits is that they have several",
"reopening at this point). Having unnecessary reviews in the queue can decrease users'",
"that are not likely to be reopened because they are shopping questions or",
"votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533), this is a cause for concern.~~ * If the user proposing the",
"been resolved. I am especially thinking of edits to posts that are not",
"help out with reviews. * ~~Users can [only vote once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) in each direction",
"center. For example, * [this suggested edit of a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714) * [this",
"doesn't *really* need a review for reopening at this point). Having unnecessary reviews",
"for concern.~~ * If the user proposing the edit does not have enough",
"are going to be deleted, anyways. * Edits bump these posts to the",
"[not clear to me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire) whether \"Leave Closed\" votes in the reopen review queue",
"need a review for reopening at this point). Having unnecessary reviews in the",
"out with reviews. * ~~Users can [only vote once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) in each direction (close,",
"issue that caused the question to be closed as off-topic. So, this creates",
"the suggested edits review queue. This is also demoralizing to reviewers, for the",
"because they are shopping questions or one of the other off topic questions",
"in the queue can decrease users' motivation to help out with reviews. *",
"good thing. But if not, it looks bad to have many closed off-topic",
"caused the question to be closed as off-topic. So, this creates unnecessary work",
"point). Having unnecessary reviews in the queue can decrease users' motivation to help",
"*voting once in the close direction*. If it does, this means that by",
"is also demoralizing to reviewers, for the same reason; it's a waste of",
"suggested edits review queue. This is also demoralizing to reviewers, for the same",
"a waste of effort for questions that are going to be deleted, anyways.",
"the edit makes the question a candidate for reopening, that's a good thing.",
"queue can decrease users' motivation to help out with reviews. * ~~Users can",
"proposing the edit does not have enough reputation to apply edits unilaterally, then",
"issue that led to the closure has been resolved. I am especially thinking",
"if we can avoid it. The argument in favor of these edits is",
"help resolve the issue that caused the question to be closed as off-topic.",
"it [causes the question to be pushed into the reopen review queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue). The",
"the reopen review queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue). The edit didn't help resolve the issue that caused",
"also demoralizing to reviewers, for the same reason; it's a waste of effort",
"reason the question was closed? Is this a valid reason for rejecting suggested",
"was closed? Is this a valid reason for rejecting suggested edits? The argument",
"be reopened because they are shopping questions or one of the other off",
"a question following edits that don't resolve the reason for closure, users are",
"as off-topic. So, this creates unnecessary work for reviewers (since the question doesn't",
"question was closed? Is this a valid reason for rejecting suggested edits? The",
"the issue that caused the question to be closed as off-topic. So, this",
"if not, it looks bad to have many closed off-topic questions on the",
"many closed off-topic questions on the front page; I'd rather not bump these",
"grammar, or other edits *only after* the issue that led to the closure",
"If it does, this means that by unnecessarily reviewing a question following edits",
"this creates unnecessary work for reviewers (since the question doesn't *really* need a",
"Closed\" votes in the reopen review queue count as *voting once in the",
"the user proposing the edit does not have enough reputation to apply edits",
"bump these posts to the front page. If the edit makes the question",
"for reopening, that's a good thing. But if not, it looks bad to",
"[causes the question to be pushed into the reopen review queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue). The edit",
"a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606) * [this suggested edit to a \"Choose a university for",
"is that they may turn out to be useful if the question is",
"into the reopen review queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue). The edit didn't help resolve the issue that",
"can avoid it. The argument in favor of these edits is that they",
"on any question. It's [not clear to me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire) whether \"Leave Closed\" votes in",
"since until now we have *not* had a site policy on the matter.)",
"into the suggested edits review queue. This is also demoralizing to reviewers, for",
"have enough reputation to apply edits unilaterally, then it will go into the",
"review queue. This is also demoralizing to reviewers, for the same reason; it's",
"closed off-topic questions on the front page; I'd rather not bump these if",
"~~Users can [only vote once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) in each direction (close, reopen) on any question.",
"be deleted, anyways. * Edits bump these posts to the front page. If",
"edited for formatting, grammar, retagging, or other issues that don't resolve the reason",
"and it is then reopened. However, it seems to me that it might",
"the issue that led to the closure has been resolved. I am especially",
"users' motivation to help out with reviews. * ~~Users can [only vote once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions)",
"topic questions listed in the help center. For example, * [this suggested edit",
"each direction (close, reopen) on any question. It's [not clear to me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire) whether",
"unnecessary work for reviewers (since the question doesn't *really* need a review for",
"this a valid reason for rejecting suggested edits? The argument against these edits",
"separately, edited to make it on-topic, and it is then reopened. However, it",
"shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606) * [this suggested edit to a \"Choose a university for me\"",
"users who can cast these votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533), this is a cause for concern.~~ *",
"doing anything wrong, since until now we have *not* had a site policy",
"clear to me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire) whether \"Leave Closed\" votes in the reopen review queue count",
"is then reopened. However, it seems to me that it might be preferable",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606) * [this suggested edit to a \"Choose a university for me\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401)",
"resolve the reason the question was closed? Is this a valid reason for",
"negative consequences: * In many cases, it [causes the question to be pushed",
"it's a waste of effort for questions that are going to be deleted,",
"the question doesn't *really* need a review for reopening at this point). Having",
"the same reason; it's a waste of effort for questions that are going",
"do these formatting, grammar, or other edits *only after* the issue that led",
"that users who made these edits were doing anything wrong, since until now",
"consequences: * In many cases, it [causes the question to be pushed into",
"reviews. * ~~Users can [only vote once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) in each direction (close, reopen) on",
"that don't resolve the reason the question was closed? Is this a valid",
"to posts that are not likely to be reopened because they are shopping",
"reviewers, for the same reason; it's a waste of effort for questions that",
"me\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401) * [this edit of a programming question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions) (Not suggesting that users",
"issues that don't resolve the reason the question was closed? Is this a",
"in the reopen review queue count as *voting once in the close direction*.",
"Is this a valid reason for rejecting suggested edits? The argument against these",
"then it will go into the suggested edits review queue. This is also",
"thing. But if not, it looks bad to have many closed off-topic questions",
"currently have [fewer than 50 active users who can cast these votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533), this",
"in the help center. For example, * [this suggested edit of a shopping",
"\"Leave Closed\" votes in the reopen review queue count as *voting once in",
"formatting, grammar, or other edits *only after* the issue that led to the",
"reason; it's a waste of effort for questions that are going to be",
"reason for closure, users are prevented from voting to close this question again",
"enough reputation to apply edits unilaterally, then it will go into the suggested",
"for formatting, grammar, retagging, or other issues that don't resolve the reason the",
"that don't resolve the reason for closure, users are prevented from voting to",
"don't resolve the reason for closure, users are prevented from voting to close",
"the close direction*. If it does, this means that by unnecessarily reviewing a",
"of these edits is that they may turn out to be useful if",
"edits were doing anything wrong, since until now we have *not* had a",
"unnecessary reviews in the queue can decrease users' motivation to help out with",
"means that by unnecessarily reviewing a question following edits that don't resolve the",
"once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) in each direction (close, reopen) on any question. It's [not clear to",
"page. If the edit makes the question a candidate for reopening, that's a",
"one of the other off topic questions listed in the help center. For",
"does not have enough reputation to apply edits unilaterally, then it will go",
"many cases, it [causes the question to be pushed into the reopen review",
"reputation to apply edits unilaterally, then it will go into the suggested edits",
"edits that don't resolve the reason for closure, users are prevented from voting",
"The argument against these edits is that they have several negative consequences: *",
"closure, users are prevented from voting to close this question again if it",
"these votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533), this is a cause for concern.~~ * If the user proposing",
"for reopening at this point). Having unnecessary reviews in the queue can decrease",
"to the closure has been resolved. I am especially thinking of edits to",
"go into the suggested edits review queue. This is also demoralizing to reviewers,",
"can [only vote once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) in each direction (close, reopen) on any question. It's",
"by unnecessarily reviewing a question following edits that don't resolve the reason for",
"don't resolve the reason the question was closed? Is this a valid reason",
"it does, this means that by unnecessarily reviewing a question following edits that",
"review for reopening at this point). Having unnecessary reviews in the queue can",
"or one of the other off topic questions listed in the help center.",
"edits review queue. This is also demoralizing to reviewers, for the same reason;",
"to a \"Choose a university for me\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401) * [this edit of a",
"does, this means that by unnecessarily reviewing a question following edits that don't",
"made these edits were doing anything wrong, since until now we have *not*",
"against these edits is that they have several negative consequences: * In many",
"to be useful if the question is also, separately, edited to make it",
"again if it becomes necessary. Given that we currently have [fewer than 50",
"or other edits *only after* the issue that led to the closure has",
"especially thinking of edits to posts that are not likely to be reopened",
"avoid it. The argument in favor of these edits is that they may",
"in each direction (close, reopen) on any question. It's [not clear to me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire)",
"edit to a \"Choose a university for me\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401) * [this edit of",
"creates unnecessary work for reviewers (since the question doesn't *really* need a review",
"reopen review queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue). The edit didn't help resolve the issue that caused the",
"that led to the closure has been resolved. I am especially thinking of",
"listed in the help center. For example, * [this suggested edit of a",
"to be deleted, anyways. * Edits bump these posts to the front page.",
"edits to posts that are not likely to be reopened because they are",
"question a candidate for reopening, that's a good thing. But if not, it",
"out to be useful if the question is also, separately, edited to make",
"The argument in favor of these edits is that they may turn out",
"queue. This is also demoralizing to reviewers, for the same reason; it's a",
"reopening, that's a good thing. But if not, it looks bad to have",
"[this suggested edit to a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606) * [this suggested edit to a",
"can decrease users' motivation to help out with reviews. * ~~Users can [only",
"*only after* the issue that led to the closure has been resolved. I",
"didn't help resolve the issue that caused the question to be closed as",
"with reviews. * ~~Users can [only vote once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) in each direction (close, reopen)",
"thinking of edits to posts that are not likely to be reopened because",
"queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue). The edit didn't help resolve the issue that caused the question to",
"or other issues that don't resolve the reason the question was closed? Is",
"on the front page; I'd rather not bump these if we can avoid",
"close this question again if it becomes necessary. Given that we currently have",
"anything wrong, since until now we have *not* had a site policy on",
"the question a candidate for reopening, that's a good thing. But if not,",
"In many cases, it [causes the question to be pushed into the reopen",
"I'd rather not bump these if we can avoid it. The argument in",
"a review for reopening at this point). Having unnecessary reviews in the queue",
"to be closed as off-topic. So, this creates unnecessary work for reviewers (since",
"for questions that are going to be deleted, anyways. * Edits bump these",
"closed as off-topic. So, this creates unnecessary work for reviewers (since the question",
"they are shopping questions or one of the other off topic questions listed",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions) (Not suggesting that users who made these edits were doing anything wrong,",
"that caused the question to be closed as off-topic. So, this creates unnecessary",
"the queue can decrease users' motivation to help out with reviews. * ~~Users",
"posts that are not likely to be reopened because they are shopping questions",
"that by unnecessarily reviewing a question following edits that don't resolve the reason",
"valid reason for rejecting suggested edits? The argument against these edits is that",
"\"Choose a university for me\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401) * [this edit of a programming question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions)",
"might be preferable to do these formatting, grammar, or other edits *only after*",
"of effort for questions that are going to be deleted, anyways. * Edits",
"may turn out to be useful if the question is also, separately, edited",
"resolve the reason for closure, users are prevented from voting to close this",
"it. The argument in favor of these edits is that they may turn",
"(Not suggesting that users who made these edits were doing anything wrong, since",
"edit does not have enough reputation to apply edits unilaterally, then it will",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401) * [this edit of a programming question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions) (Not suggesting that users who",
"other issues that don't resolve the reason the question was closed? Is this",
"if it becomes necessary. Given that we currently have [fewer than 50 active",
"user proposing the edit does not have enough reputation to apply edits unilaterally,",
"for the same reason; it's a waste of effort for questions that are",
"queue count as *voting once in the close direction*. If it does, this",
"shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714) * [this suggested edit to a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606) * [this suggested",
"that we currently have [fewer than 50 active users who can cast these",
"the help center. For example, * [this suggested edit of a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714)",
"deleted, anyways. * Edits bump these posts to the front page. If the",
"be preferable to do these formatting, grammar, or other edits *only after* the",
"closed? Is this a valid reason for rejecting suggested edits? The argument against",
"to be pushed into the reopen review queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue). The edit didn't help resolve",
"whether \"Leave Closed\" votes in the reopen review queue count as *voting once",
"edits is that they may turn out to be useful if the question",
"be closed as off-topic. So, this creates unnecessary work for reviewers (since the",
"[this suggested edit of a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714) * [this suggested edit to a",
"edit makes the question a candidate for reopening, that's a good thing. But",
"for rejecting suggested edits? The argument against these edits is that they have",
"direction (close, reopen) on any question. It's [not clear to me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire) whether \"Leave",
"help center. For example, * [this suggested edit of a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714) *",
"review queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue). The edit didn't help resolve the issue that caused the question",
"if the question is also, separately, edited to make it on-topic, and it",
"apply edits unilaterally, then it will go into the suggested edits review queue.",
"reopen review queue count as *voting once in the close direction*. If it",
"other off topic questions listed in the help center. For example, * [this",
"these posts to the front page. If the edit makes the question a",
"questions on the front page; I'd rather not bump these if we can",
"not have enough reputation to apply edits unilaterally, then it will go into",
"same reason; it's a waste of effort for questions that are going to",
"to make it on-topic, and it is then reopened. However, it seems to",
"it looks bad to have many closed off-topic questions on the front page;",
"unnecessarily reviewing a question following edits that don't resolve the reason for closure,",
"review queue count as *voting once in the close direction*. If it does,",
"than 50 active users who can cast these votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533), this is a cause",
"For example, * [this suggested edit of a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714) * [this suggested",
"* If the user proposing the edit does not have enough reputation to",
"off-topic be edited for formatting, grammar, retagging, or other issues that don't resolve",
"resolved. I am especially thinking of edits to posts that are not likely",
"to have many closed off-topic questions on the front page; I'd rather not",
"The edit didn't help resolve the issue that caused the question to be",
"Edits bump these posts to the front page. If the edit makes the",
"This is also demoralizing to reviewers, for the same reason; it's a waste",
"anyways. * Edits bump these posts to the front page. If the edit",
"necessary. Given that we currently have [fewer than 50 active users who can",
"reviewing a question following edits that don't resolve the reason for closure, users",
"following edits that don't resolve the reason for closure, users are prevented from",
"a good thing. But if not, it looks bad to have many closed",
"the front page; I'd rather not bump these if we can avoid it.",
"of a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714) * [this suggested edit to a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606) *",
"at this point). Having unnecessary reviews in the queue can decrease users' motivation",
"the reason for closure, users are prevented from voting to close this question",
"suggested edit to a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606) * [this suggested edit to a \"Choose",
"who can cast these votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533), this is a cause for concern.~~ * If",
"of the other off topic questions listed in the help center. For example,",
"me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire) whether \"Leave Closed\" votes in the reopen review queue count as *voting",
"questions or one of the other off topic questions listed in the help",
"that's a good thing. But if not, it looks bad to have many",
"not bump these if we can avoid it. The argument in favor of",
"demoralizing to reviewers, for the same reason; it's a waste of effort for",
"question again if it becomes necessary. Given that we currently have [fewer than",
"edited to make it on-topic, and it is then reopened. However, it seems",
"who made these edits were doing anything wrong, since until now we have",
"once in the close direction*. If it does, this means that by unnecessarily",
"useful if the question is also, separately, edited to make it on-topic, and",
"going to be deleted, anyways. * Edits bump these posts to the front",
"of edits to posts that are not likely to be reopened because they",
"suggested edit to a \"Choose a university for me\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401) * [this edit",
"questions listed in the help center. For example, * [this suggested edit of",
"in favor of these edits is that they may turn out to be",
"these if we can avoid it. The argument in favor of these edits",
"reviewers (since the question doesn't *really* need a review for reopening at this",
"programming question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions) (Not suggesting that users who made these edits were doing anything",
"However, it seems to me that it might be preferable to do these",
"that they have several negative consequences: * In many cases, it [causes the",
"questions that are closed for being off-topic be edited for formatting, grammar, retagging,",
"the closure has been resolved. I am especially thinking of edits to posts",
"candidate for reopening, that's a good thing. But if not, it looks bad",
"page; I'd rather not bump these if we can avoid it. The argument",
"* In many cases, it [causes the question to be pushed into the",
"have [fewer than 50 active users who can cast these votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533), this is",
"they may turn out to be useful if the question is also, separately,",
"suggesting that users who made these edits were doing anything wrong, since until",
"question doesn't *really* need a review for reopening at this point). Having unnecessary",
"for reviewers (since the question doesn't *really* need a review for reopening at",
"of a programming question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions) (Not suggesting that users who made these edits were",
"looks bad to have many closed off-topic questions on the front page; I'd",
"question. It's [not clear to me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire) whether \"Leave Closed\" votes in the reopen",
"is also, separately, edited to make it on-topic, and it is then reopened.",
"it will go into the suggested edits review queue. This is also demoralizing",
"turn out to be useful if the question is also, separately, edited to",
"be edited for formatting, grammar, retagging, or other issues that don't resolve the",
"edit to a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13606) * [this suggested edit to a \"Choose a",
"is a cause for concern.~~ * If the user proposing the edit does",
"not, it looks bad to have many closed off-topic questions on the front",
"in the close direction*. If it does, this means that by unnecessarily reviewing",
"question to be closed as off-topic. So, this creates unnecessary work for reviewers",
"it seems to me that it might be preferable to do these formatting,",
"cause for concern.~~ * If the user proposing the edit does not have",
"example, * [this suggested edit of a shopping question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13714) * [this suggested edit",
"a cause for concern.~~ * If the user proposing the edit does not",
"Having unnecessary reviews in the queue can decrease users' motivation to help out",
"question to be pushed into the reopen review queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue). The edit didn't help",
"other edits *only after* the issue that led to the closure has been",
"decrease users' motivation to help out with reviews. * ~~Users can [only vote",
"cases, it [causes the question to be pushed into the reopen review queue](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/256567/which-edits-push-closed-questions-to-the-reopen-review-queue).",
"reopened because they are shopping questions or one of the other off topic",
"university for me\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401) * [this edit of a programming question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions) (Not suggesting",
"argument in favor of these edits is that they may turn out to",
"active users who can cast these votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533), this is a cause for concern.~~",
"make it on-topic, and it is then reopened. However, it seems to me",
"this question again if it becomes necessary. Given that we currently have [fewer",
"work for reviewers (since the question doesn't *really* need a review for reopening",
"argument against these edits is that they have several negative consequences: * In",
"is that they have several negative consequences: * In many cases, it [causes",
"it is then reopened. However, it seems to me that it might be",
"[fewer than 50 active users who can cast these votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533), this is a",
"[this edit of a programming question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions) (Not suggesting that users who made these",
"formatting, grammar, retagging, or other issues that don't resolve the reason the question",
"reviews in the queue can decrease users' motivation to help out with reviews.",
"favor of these edits is that they may turn out to be useful",
"led to the closure has been resolved. I am especially thinking of edits",
"to close this question again if it becomes necessary. Given that we currently",
"(close, reopen) on any question. It's [not clear to me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire) whether \"Leave Closed\"",
"these edits were doing anything wrong, since until now we have *not* had",
"* [this edit of a programming question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions) (Not suggesting that users who made",
"to reviewers, for the same reason; it's a waste of effort for questions",
"are shopping questions or one of the other off topic questions listed in",
"any question. It's [not clear to me](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/239098/do-leave-closed-votes-in-reopen-queue-count-as-voting-once-in-the-close-dire) whether \"Leave Closed\" votes in the",
"prevented from voting to close this question again if it becomes necessary. Given",
"to apply edits unilaterally, then it will go into the suggested edits review",
"has been resolved. I am especially thinking of edits to posts that are",
"effort for questions that are going to be deleted, anyways. * Edits bump",
"shopping questions or one of the other off topic questions listed in the",
"50 active users who can cast these votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533), this is a cause for",
"the question to be closed as off-topic. So, this creates unnecessary work for",
"voting to close this question again if it becomes necessary. Given that we",
"are prevented from voting to close this question again if it becomes necessary.",
"me that it might be preferable to do these formatting, grammar, or other",
"we can avoid it. The argument in favor of these edits is that",
"for me\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/13401) * [this edit of a programming question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/25697/revisions) (Not suggesting that",
"after* the issue that led to the closure has been resolved. I am",
"from voting to close this question again if it becomes necessary. Given that",
"edits? The argument against these edits is that they have several negative consequences:",
"can cast these votes](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/edit/223533), this is a cause for concern.~~ * If the",
"to the front page. If the edit makes the question a candidate for"
] |
[
"Based on the positive response to the [shopping closure tag question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1178/should-we-create-a-shopping-question-closure-tag) I recently",
"the \"cannot be generalized\" tag to incorporate this specifically. I would propose to",
"the tag as follows: > > Questions that cannot be generalized to apply",
"to others in similar situations are off-topic. In particular, \"shopping\" questions asking about",
"generalized to apply to others in similar situations are off-topic. In particular, \"shopping\"",
"this would be to edit the \"cannot be generalized\" tag to incorporate this",
"follows: > > Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to others in",
"particular, \"shopping\" questions asking about recommendations for specific programs or universities are off-topic.",
"closure tag question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1178/should-we-create-a-shopping-question-closure-tag) I recently asked, I think the best way to handle",
"to the [shopping closure tag question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1178/should-we-create-a-shopping-question-closure-tag) I recently asked, I think the best",
"best way to handle this would be to edit the \"cannot be generalized\"",
"to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are too",
"similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are too localized? > > >",
"cannot be generalized to apply to others in similar situations are off-topic. In",
"questions that can apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds",
"would be to edit the \"cannot be generalized\" tag to incorporate this specifically.",
"I would propose to change the text of the tag as follows: >",
"propose to change the text of the tag as follows: > > Questions",
"incorporate this specifically. I would propose to change the text of the tag",
"multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are too localized?",
"text of the tag as follows: > > Questions that cannot be generalized",
"similar situations are off-topic. In particular, \"shopping\" questions asking about recommendations for specific",
"asked, I think the best way to handle this would be to edit",
"can apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions",
"to edit the \"cannot be generalized\" tag to incorporate this specifically. I would",
"assistance in writing questions that can apply to multiple people facing similar situations,",
"or universities are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can apply to",
"on the positive response to the [shopping closure tag question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1178/should-we-create-a-shopping-question-closure-tag) I recently asked,",
"people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are too localized? >",
"\"cannot be generalized\" tag to incorporate this specifically. I would propose to change",
"the text of the tag as follows: > > Questions that cannot be",
"situations are off-topic. In particular, \"shopping\" questions asking about recommendations for specific programs",
"handle this would be to edit the \"cannot be generalized\" tag to incorporate",
"be generalized\" tag to incorporate this specifically. I would propose to change the",
"generalized\" tag to incorporate this specifically. I would propose to change the text",
"I recently asked, I think the best way to handle this would be",
"> Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to others in similar situations",
"way to handle this would be to edit the \"cannot be generalized\" tag",
"tag question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1178/should-we-create-a-shopping-question-closure-tag) I recently asked, I think the best way to handle this",
"writing questions that can apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What",
"apply to others in similar situations are off-topic. In particular, \"shopping\" questions asking",
"the [shopping closure tag question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1178/should-we-create-a-shopping-question-closure-tag) I recently asked, I think the best way",
"response to the [shopping closure tag question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1178/should-we-create-a-shopping-question-closure-tag) I recently asked, I think the",
"facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are too localized? > >",
"about recommendations for specific programs or universities are off-topic. For assistance in writing",
"specifically. I would propose to change the text of the tag as follows:",
"apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are",
"[shopping closure tag question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1178/should-we-create-a-shopping-question-closure-tag) I recently asked, I think the best way to",
"I think the best way to handle this would be to edit the",
"edit the \"cannot be generalized\" tag to incorporate this specifically. I would propose",
"this specifically. I would propose to change the text of the tag as",
"for specific programs or universities are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that",
"be generalized to apply to others in similar situations are off-topic. In particular,",
"asking about recommendations for specific programs or universities are off-topic. For assistance in",
"in writing questions that can apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see:",
"positive response to the [shopping closure tag question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1178/should-we-create-a-shopping-question-closure-tag) I recently asked, I think",
"the positive response to the [shopping closure tag question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1178/should-we-create-a-shopping-question-closure-tag) I recently asked, I",
"others in similar situations are off-topic. In particular, \"shopping\" questions asking about recommendations",
"that cannot be generalized to apply to others in similar situations are off-topic.",
"think the best way to handle this would be to edit the \"cannot",
"recommendations for specific programs or universities are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions",
"off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can apply to multiple people facing",
"> > Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to others in similar",
"would propose to change the text of the tag as follows: > >",
"\"shopping\" questions asking about recommendations for specific programs or universities are off-topic. For",
"the best way to handle this would be to edit the \"cannot be",
"to apply to others in similar situations are off-topic. In particular, \"shopping\" questions",
"as follows: > > Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to others",
"questions asking about recommendations for specific programs or universities are off-topic. For assistance",
"be to edit the \"cannot be generalized\" tag to incorporate this specifically. I",
"For assistance in writing questions that can apply to multiple people facing similar",
"are off-topic. In particular, \"shopping\" questions asking about recommendations for specific programs or",
"tag to incorporate this specifically. I would propose to change the text of",
"of the tag as follows: > > Questions that cannot be generalized to",
"recently asked, I think the best way to handle this would be to",
"in similar situations are off-topic. In particular, \"shopping\" questions asking about recommendations for",
"Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to others in similar situations are",
"off-topic. In particular, \"shopping\" questions asking about recommendations for specific programs or universities",
"In particular, \"shopping\" questions asking about recommendations for specific programs or universities are",
"universities are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can apply to multiple",
"that can apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of",
"change the text of the tag as follows: > > Questions that cannot",
"to handle this would be to edit the \"cannot be generalized\" tag to",
"tag as follows: > > Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to",
"specific programs or universities are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can",
"programs or universities are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can apply",
"are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can apply to multiple people",
"question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1178/should-we-create-a-shopping-question-closure-tag) I recently asked, I think the best way to handle this would",
"to change the text of the tag as follows: > > Questions that",
"to incorporate this specifically. I would propose to change the text of the"
] |
[
"in graduate admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions) Question 2 was long ago marked as a duplicate of",
"3: [How would a Coursera specialization be regarded in graduate admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions) Question 2",
"3 was just asked, and I think it is an exact duplicate of",
"the OP edit it to highlight the difference from Question 2, but I",
"the following three questions: * Question 1: [Can I include the completion of",
"[Is an X-Series Certificate from edx useful for graduate school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school) * Question 3:",
"admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions) Question 2 was long ago marked as a duplicate of Question 1.",
"as a duplicate of Question 1. However, I do not think it is",
"don't want to vote it as a duplicate of Question 1, since I",
"CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in) * Question 2: [Is an X-Series Certificate from edx useful for graduate",
"it is an exact duplicate of Question 2. What to do now? I",
"to leave it open, since I think it's an exact duplicate of an",
"duplicate of an existing question. I suggested that the OP edit it to",
"I think it is an exact duplicate of Question 2. What to do",
"think it is an exact duplicate of Question 2. What to do now?",
"[Can I include the completion of Udacity and Coursera classes I have attended",
"And I don't want to leave it open, since I think it's an",
"Udacity and Coursera classes I have attended in an academic CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in) * Question",
"think it is an exact duplicate. Question 3 was just asked, and I",
"was long ago marked as a duplicate of Question 1. However, I do",
"1, since I don't think it is. I also don't want to vote",
"want to vote it as a duplicate of Question 2, since Question 2",
"was just asked, and I think it is an exact duplicate of Question",
"now? I don't want to vote it as a duplicate of Question 1,",
"graduate school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school) * Question 3: [How would a Coursera specialization be regarded in",
"have the following three questions: * Question 1: [Can I include the completion",
"I don't think it is. I also don't want to vote it as",
"an exact duplicate. Question 3 was just asked, and I think it is",
"it is an exact duplicate. Question 3 was just asked, and I think",
"that the OP edit it to highlight the difference from Question 2, but",
"* Question 1: [Can I include the completion of Udacity and Coursera classes",
"don't want to vote it as a duplicate of Question 2, since Question",
"Question 2. What to do now? I don't want to vote it as",
"duplicate. Question 3 was just asked, and I think it is an exact",
"in an academic CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in) * Question 2: [Is an X-Series Certificate from edx",
"it as a duplicate of Question 2, since Question 2 is itself a",
"Suppose we have the following three questions: * Question 1: [Can I include",
"the completion of Udacity and Coursera classes I have attended in an academic",
"I don't want to leave it open, since I think it's an exact",
"want to vote it as a duplicate of Question 1, since I don't",
"three questions: * Question 1: [Can I include the completion of Udacity and",
"do now? I don't want to vote it as a duplicate of Question",
"of Question 2. What to do now? I don't want to vote it",
"edx useful for graduate school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school) * Question 3: [How would a Coursera specialization",
"to vote it as a duplicate of Question 2, since Question 2 is",
"it's an exact duplicate of an existing question. I suggested that the OP",
"exact duplicate. Question 3 was just asked, and I think it is an",
"1: [Can I include the completion of Udacity and Coursera classes I have",
"Question 3: [How would a Coursera specialization be regarded in graduate admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions) Question",
"is an exact duplicate. Question 3 was just asked, and I think it",
"What to do now? I don't want to vote it as a duplicate",
"think it is. I also don't want to vote it as a duplicate",
"Question 1. However, I do not think it is an exact duplicate. Question",
"as a duplicate of Question 2, since Question 2 is itself a duplicate.",
"itself a duplicate. And I don't want to leave it open, since I",
"duplicate of Question 1, since I don't think it is. I also don't",
"exact duplicate of an existing question. I suggested that the OP edit it",
"an X-Series Certificate from edx useful for graduate school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school) * Question 3: [How",
"duplicate. And I don't want to leave it open, since I think it's",
"don't want to leave it open, since I think it's an exact duplicate",
"I suggested that the OP edit it to highlight the difference from Question",
"a duplicate of Question 2, since Question 2 is itself a duplicate. And",
"Question 2 is itself a duplicate. And I don't want to leave it",
"think it's an exact duplicate of an existing question. I suggested that the",
"for graduate school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school) * Question 3: [How would a Coursera specialization be regarded",
"Coursera specialization be regarded in graduate admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions) Question 2 was long ago marked",
"it as a duplicate of Question 1, since I don't think it is.",
"existing question. I suggested that the OP edit it to highlight the difference",
"leave it open, since I think it's an exact duplicate of an existing",
"I also don't want to vote it as a duplicate of Question 2,",
"I include the completion of Udacity and Coursera classes I have attended in",
"since I don't think it is. I also don't want to vote it",
"an existing question. I suggested that the OP edit it to highlight the",
"have attended in an academic CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in) * Question 2: [Is an X-Series Certificate",
"classes I have attended in an academic CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in) * Question 2: [Is an",
"be regarded in graduate admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions) Question 2 was long ago marked as a",
"and Coursera classes I have attended in an academic CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in) * Question 2:",
"questions: * Question 1: [Can I include the completion of Udacity and Coursera",
"* Question 3: [How would a Coursera specialization be regarded in graduate admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions)",
"do not think it is an exact duplicate. Question 3 was just asked,",
"suggested that the OP edit it to highlight the difference from Question 2,",
"following three questions: * Question 1: [Can I include the completion of Udacity",
"I do not think it is an exact duplicate. Question 3 was just",
"from edx useful for graduate school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school) * Question 3: [How would a Coursera",
"2: [Is an X-Series Certificate from edx useful for graduate school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school) * Question",
"Coursera classes I have attended in an academic CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in) * Question 2: [Is",
"attended in an academic CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in) * Question 2: [Is an X-Series Certificate from",
"Question 2 was long ago marked as a duplicate of Question 1. However,",
"duplicate of Question 2. What to do now? I don't want to vote",
"Question 1: [Can I include the completion of Udacity and Coursera classes I",
"also don't want to vote it as a duplicate of Question 2, since",
"Question 3 was just asked, and I think it is an exact duplicate",
"an academic CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in) * Question 2: [Is an X-Series Certificate from edx useful",
"Question 2, since Question 2 is itself a duplicate. And I don't want",
"question. I suggested that the OP edit it to highlight the difference from",
"it to highlight the difference from Question 2, but I still think it's",
"of Udacity and Coursera classes I have attended in an academic CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in) *",
"include the completion of Udacity and Coursera classes I have attended in an",
"Certificate from edx useful for graduate school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school) * Question 3: [How would a",
"2, since Question 2 is itself a duplicate. And I don't want to",
"2. What to do now? I don't want to vote it as a",
"graduate admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions) Question 2 was long ago marked as a duplicate of Question",
"an exact duplicate of Question 2. What to do now? I don't want",
"I have attended in an academic CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in) * Question 2: [Is an X-Series",
"useful for graduate school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school) * Question 3: [How would a Coursera specialization be",
"vote it as a duplicate of Question 2, since Question 2 is itself",
"don't think it is. I also don't want to vote it as a",
"asked, and I think it is an exact duplicate of Question 2. What",
"of Question 2, since Question 2 is itself a duplicate. And I don't",
"not think it is an exact duplicate. Question 3 was just asked, and",
"academic CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in) * Question 2: [Is an X-Series Certificate from edx useful for",
"would a Coursera specialization be regarded in graduate admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions) Question 2 was long",
"completion of Udacity and Coursera classes I have attended in an academic CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in)",
"exact duplicate of Question 2. What to do now? I don't want to",
"the difference from Question 2, but I still think it's fundamentally the same",
"I don't want to vote it as a duplicate of Question 1, since",
"open, since I think it's an exact duplicate of an existing question. I",
"X-Series Certificate from edx useful for graduate school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school) * Question 3: [How would",
"Question 2: [Is an X-Series Certificate from edx useful for graduate school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school) *",
"* Question 2: [Is an X-Series Certificate from edx useful for graduate school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school)",
"difference from Question 2, but I still think it's fundamentally the same question.",
"specialization be regarded in graduate admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions) Question 2 was long ago marked as",
"a duplicate. And I don't want to leave it open, since I think",
"Question 1, since I don't think it is. I also don't want to",
"of Question 1, since I don't think it is. I also don't want",
"I think it's an exact duplicate of an existing question. I suggested that",
"ago marked as a duplicate of Question 1. However, I do not think",
"just asked, and I think it is an exact duplicate of Question 2.",
"regarded in graduate admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions) Question 2 was long ago marked as a duplicate",
"school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25951/is-an-x-series-certificate-from-edx-useful-for-graduate-school) * Question 3: [How would a Coursera specialization be regarded in graduate",
"to do now? I don't want to vote it as a duplicate of",
"as a duplicate of Question 1, since I don't think it is. I",
"it is. I also don't want to vote it as a duplicate of",
"of an existing question. I suggested that the OP edit it to highlight",
"want to leave it open, since I think it's an exact duplicate of",
"to highlight the difference from Question 2, but I still think it's fundamentally",
"OP edit it to highlight the difference from Question 2, but I still",
"marked as a duplicate of Question 1. However, I do not think it",
"[How would a Coursera specialization be regarded in graduate admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions) Question 2 was",
"and I think it is an exact duplicate of Question 2. What to",
"an exact duplicate of an existing question. I suggested that the OP edit",
"it open, since I think it's an exact duplicate of an existing question.",
"long ago marked as a duplicate of Question 1. However, I do not",
"2 is itself a duplicate. And I don't want to leave it open,",
"of Question 1. However, I do not think it is an exact duplicate.",
"is an exact duplicate of Question 2. What to do now? I don't",
"duplicate of Question 1. However, I do not think it is an exact",
"is itself a duplicate. And I don't want to leave it open, since",
"vote it as a duplicate of Question 1, since I don't think it",
"since I think it's an exact duplicate of an existing question. I suggested",
"2 was long ago marked as a duplicate of Question 1. However, I",
"a duplicate of Question 1. However, I do not think it is an",
"highlight the difference from Question 2, but I still think it's fundamentally the",
"we have the following three questions: * Question 1: [Can I include the",
"However, I do not think it is an exact duplicate. Question 3 was",
"duplicate of Question 2, since Question 2 is itself a duplicate. And I",
"1. However, I do not think it is an exact duplicate. Question 3",
"a Coursera specialization be regarded in graduate admissions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28405/how-would-a-coursera-specialization-be-regarded-in-graduate-admissions) Question 2 was long ago",
"is. I also don't want to vote it as a duplicate of Question",
"since Question 2 is itself a duplicate. And I don't want to leave",
"a duplicate of Question 1, since I don't think it is. I also",
"to vote it as a duplicate of Question 1, since I don't think",
"edit it to highlight the difference from Question 2, but I still think"
] |
[
"the [What are tags, and how should I use them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging) entry in the",
"is a little hard for me. Despite reading the [What are tags, and",
"clues on how to choose correct tags in an easier way? Please provide",
"me clear clues on how to choose correct tags in an easier way?",
"little hard for me. Despite reading the [What are tags, and how should",
"on how to choose correct tags in an easier way? Please provide examples",
"entry in the help center; choosing best tags is a little vague for",
"in the help center; choosing best tags is a little vague for me.",
"and how should I use them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging) entry in the help center; choosing best",
"center; choosing best tags is a little vague for me. Could please give",
"clear clues on how to choose correct tags in an easier way? Please",
"are tags, and how should I use them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging) entry in the help center;",
"Despite reading the [What are tags, and how should I use them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging) entry",
"good tags for questions is a little hard for me. Despite reading the",
"please give me clear clues on how to choose correct tags in an",
"tags for questions is a little hard for me. Despite reading the [What",
"for me. Could please give me clear clues on how to choose correct",
"to choose correct tags in an easier way? Please provide examples in your",
"use them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging) entry in the help center; choosing best tags is a little",
"is a little vague for me. Could please give me clear clues on",
"choosing best tags is a little vague for me. Could please give me",
"reading the [What are tags, and how should I use them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging) entry in",
"me. Could please give me clear clues on how to choose correct tags",
"Could please give me clear clues on how to choose correct tags in",
"the help center; choosing best tags is a little vague for me. Could",
"questions is a little hard for me. Despite reading the [What are tags,",
"a little vague for me. Could please give me clear clues on how",
"[What are tags, and how should I use them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging) entry in the help",
"tags is a little vague for me. Could please give me clear clues",
"how should I use them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging) entry in the help center; choosing best tags",
"give me clear clues on how to choose correct tags in an easier",
"choose correct tags in an easier way? Please provide examples in your answers.",
"me. Despite reading the [What are tags, and how should I use them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging)",
"help center; choosing best tags is a little vague for me. Could please",
"I use them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging) entry in the help center; choosing best tags is a",
"Choosing good tags for questions is a little hard for me. Despite reading",
"them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging) entry in the help center; choosing best tags is a little vague",
"hard for me. Despite reading the [What are tags, and how should I",
"should I use them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging) entry in the help center; choosing best tags is",
"vague for me. Could please give me clear clues on how to choose",
"tags, and how should I use them?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/tagging) entry in the help center; choosing",
"how to choose correct tags in an easier way? Please provide examples in",
"little vague for me. Could please give me clear clues on how to",
"for questions is a little hard for me. Despite reading the [What are",
"for me. Despite reading the [What are tags, and how should I use",
"best tags is a little vague for me. Could please give me clear",
"a little hard for me. Despite reading the [What are tags, and how"
] |
[
"anyone have any other comments or suggestions on how to minimize disruption when",
"are not in great shape, to say the least. Big tags like [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd",
"think of to minimize disruption: * only bump 5-6 old posts at a",
"view) doesn't already have a bunch of old posts near the top. (i.e.",
"of old posts near the top. (i.e. don't everybody go on tagging sprees",
"old posts near the top. (i.e. don't everybody go on tagging sprees at",
"operations on this site, I've been taking any steps I can think of",
"are beyond the scope of this particular post, and need *major* discussion on",
"at the same time) * when bumping an old post for retagging (or",
"fix tags on new questions immediately when they're asked. Does anyone have any",
"the post at the same time: correct typos, remove incorrect tags, etc. This",
"[graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\") are beyond the scope of this particular post,",
"posts when the front page (in 'active' view) doesn't already have a bunch",
"this particular post, and need *major* discussion on meta before anyone acts on",
"have any other comments or suggestions on how to minimize disruption when cleaning",
"at a time * only bump old posts when the front page (in",
"'graduate-school'\") are beyond the scope of this particular post, and need *major* discussion",
"comments or suggestions on how to minimize disruption when cleaning up tags as",
"has been general agreement [here on meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1202/11365) that our tags are not in",
"shape, to say the least. Big tags like [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\")",
"other comments or suggestions on how to minimize disruption when cleaning up tags",
"old post), fix everything else that's wrong with the post at the same",
"few retags. I've been working on some of these lately. Given that mass",
"can think of to minimize disruption: * only bump 5-6 old posts at",
"great shape, to say the least. Big tags like [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged",
"bump old posts when the front page (in 'active' view) doesn't already have",
"doesn't already have a bunch of old posts near the top. (i.e. don't",
"general agreement [here on meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1202/11365) that our tags are not in great shape,",
"someone else bumps an old post), fix everything else that's wrong with the",
"old posts when the front page (in 'active' view) doesn't already have a",
"themselves easily to cleanup with just a few retags. I've been working on",
"are *very* disruptive to regular operations on this site, I've been taking any",
"time * only bump old posts when the front page (in 'active' view)",
"already have a bunch of old posts near the top. (i.e. don't everybody",
"won't have to bump it *again* to fix something else. * fix tags",
"top. (i.e. don't everybody go on tagging sprees at the same time) *",
"way, we won't have to bump it *again* to fix something else. *",
"[phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\") are beyond",
"'phd'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\") are beyond the scope of this",
"of these lately. Given that mass retags are *very* disruptive to regular operations",
"on them. But some (very small) tags lend themselves easily to cleanup with",
"(very small) tags lend themselves easily to cleanup with just a few retags.",
"page (in 'active' view) doesn't already have a bunch of old posts near",
"post at the same time: correct typos, remove incorrect tags, etc. This way,",
"a few retags. I've been working on some of these lately. Given that",
"wrong with the post at the same time: correct typos, remove incorrect tags,",
"to cleanup with just a few retags. I've been working on some of",
"tags, etc. This way, we won't have to bump it *again* to fix",
"been general agreement [here on meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1202/11365) that our tags are not in great",
"immediately when they're asked. Does anyone have any other comments or suggestions on",
"with the post at the same time: correct typos, remove incorrect tags, etc.",
"post), fix everything else that's wrong with the post at the same time:",
"tagging sprees at the same time) * when bumping an old post for",
"and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\") are beyond the scope of this particular",
"the scope of this particular post, and need *major* discussion on meta before",
"tagged 'graduate-school'\") are beyond the scope of this particular post, and need *major*",
"this site, I've been taking any steps I can think of to minimize",
"time) * when bumping an old post for retagging (or when someone else",
"have a bunch of old posts near the top. (i.e. don't everybody go",
"easily to cleanup with just a few retags. I've been working on some",
"the same time) * when bumping an old post for retagging (or when",
"on tagging sprees at the same time) * when bumping an old post",
"that's wrong with the post at the same time: correct typos, remove incorrect",
"suggestions on how to minimize disruption when cleaning up tags as part of",
"disruption: * only bump 5-6 old posts at a time * only bump",
"to bump it *again* to fix something else. * fix tags on new",
"fix something else. * fix tags on new questions immediately when they're asked.",
"etc. This way, we won't have to bump it *again* to fix something",
"\"show questions tagged 'phd'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\") are beyond the",
"scope of this particular post, and need *major* discussion on meta before anyone",
"* fix tags on new questions immediately when they're asked. Does anyone have",
"* only bump 5-6 old posts at a time * only bump old",
"bunch of old posts near the top. (i.e. don't everybody go on tagging",
"old posts at a time * only bump old posts when the front",
"I can think of to minimize disruption: * only bump 5-6 old posts",
"like [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\") are",
"beyond the scope of this particular post, and need *major* discussion on meta",
"small) tags lend themselves easily to cleanup with just a few retags. I've",
"an old post), fix everything else that's wrong with the post at the",
"tags lend themselves easily to cleanup with just a few retags. I've been",
"on how to minimize disruption when cleaning up tags as part of small,",
"meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1202/11365) that our tags are not in great shape, to say the least.",
"(i.e. don't everybody go on tagging sprees at the same time) * when",
"any steps I can think of to minimize disruption: * only bump 5-6",
"these lately. Given that mass retags are *very* disruptive to regular operations on",
"some (very small) tags lend themselves easily to cleanup with just a few",
"a time * only bump old posts when the front page (in 'active'",
"bump 5-6 old posts at a time * only bump old posts when",
"(in 'active' view) doesn't already have a bunch of old posts near the",
"I've been working on some of these lately. Given that mass retags are",
"I've been taking any steps I can think of to minimize disruption: *",
"tags like [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\")",
"*again* to fix something else. * fix tags on new questions immediately when",
"on new questions immediately when they're asked. Does anyone have any other comments",
"Big tags like [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged",
"anyone acts on them. But some (very small) tags lend themselves easily to",
"on meta before anyone acts on them. But some (very small) tags lend",
"This way, we won't have to bump it *again* to fix something else.",
"questions immediately when they're asked. Does anyone have any other comments or suggestions",
"remove incorrect tags, etc. This way, we won't have to bump it *again*",
"before anyone acts on them. But some (very small) tags lend themselves easily",
"incorrect tags, etc. This way, we won't have to bump it *again* to",
"a bunch of old posts near the top. (i.e. don't everybody go on",
"agreement [here on meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1202/11365) that our tags are not in great shape, to",
"that our tags are not in great shape, to say the least. Big",
"how to minimize disruption when cleaning up tags as part of small, focused",
"least. Big tags like [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions",
"to minimize disruption when cleaning up tags as part of small, focused effort?",
"retagging (or when someone else bumps an old post), fix everything else that's",
"(or when someone else bumps an old post), fix everything else that's wrong",
"not in great shape, to say the least. Big tags like [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show",
"when they're asked. Does anyone have any other comments or suggestions on how",
"asked. Does anyone have any other comments or suggestions on how to minimize",
"regular operations on this site, I've been taking any steps I can think",
"tagged 'phd'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\") are beyond the scope of",
"some of these lately. Given that mass retags are *very* disruptive to regular",
"been taking any steps I can think of to minimize disruption: * only",
"working on some of these lately. Given that mass retags are *very* disruptive",
"disruptive to regular operations on this site, I've been taking any steps I",
"when someone else bumps an old post), fix everything else that's wrong with",
"'active' view) doesn't already have a bunch of old posts near the top.",
"cleanup with just a few retags. I've been working on some of these",
"minimize disruption: * only bump 5-6 old posts at a time * only",
"discussion on meta before anyone acts on them. But some (very small) tags",
"the least. Big tags like [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show",
"But some (very small) tags lend themselves easily to cleanup with just a",
"typos, remove incorrect tags, etc. This way, we won't have to bump it",
"the front page (in 'active' view) doesn't already have a bunch of old",
"mass retags are *very* disruptive to regular operations on this site, I've been",
"the same time: correct typos, remove incorrect tags, etc. This way, we won't",
"we won't have to bump it *again* to fix something else. * fix",
"near the top. (i.e. don't everybody go on tagging sprees at the same",
"else that's wrong with the post at the same time: correct typos, remove",
"on this site, I've been taking any steps I can think of to",
"taking any steps I can think of to minimize disruption: * only bump",
"lately. Given that mass retags are *very* disruptive to regular operations on this",
"have to bump it *again* to fix something else. * fix tags on",
"sprees at the same time) * when bumping an old post for retagging",
"new questions immediately when they're asked. Does anyone have any other comments or",
"of this particular post, and need *major* discussion on meta before anyone acts",
"bump it *again* to fix something else. * fix tags on new questions",
"in great shape, to say the least. Big tags like [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions",
"everybody go on tagging sprees at the same time) * when bumping an",
"only bump old posts when the front page (in 'active' view) doesn't already",
"for retagging (or when someone else bumps an old post), fix everything else",
"to say the least. Big tags like [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") and",
"need *major* discussion on meta before anyone acts on them. But some (very",
"only bump 5-6 old posts at a time * only bump old posts",
"same time: correct typos, remove incorrect tags, etc. This way, we won't have",
"with just a few retags. I've been working on some of these lately.",
"an old post for retagging (or when someone else bumps an old post),",
"Given that mass retags are *very* disruptive to regular operations on this site,",
"5-6 old posts at a time * only bump old posts when the",
"them. But some (very small) tags lend themselves easily to cleanup with just",
"questions tagged 'phd'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\") are beyond the scope",
"old post for retagging (or when someone else bumps an old post), fix",
"site, I've been taking any steps I can think of to minimize disruption:",
"they're asked. Does anyone have any other comments or suggestions on how to",
"the top. (i.e. don't everybody go on tagging sprees at the same time)",
"posts at a time * only bump old posts when the front page",
"something else. * fix tags on new questions immediately when they're asked. Does",
"or suggestions on how to minimize disruption when cleaning up tags as part",
"else bumps an old post), fix everything else that's wrong with the post",
"[here on meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1202/11365) that our tags are not in great shape, to say",
"particular post, and need *major* discussion on meta before anyone acts on them.",
"it *again* to fix something else. * fix tags on new questions immediately",
"that mass retags are *very* disruptive to regular operations on this site, I've",
"and need *major* discussion on meta before anyone acts on them. But some",
"front page (in 'active' view) doesn't already have a bunch of old posts",
"retags. I've been working on some of these lately. Given that mass retags",
"to minimize disruption: * only bump 5-6 old posts at a time *",
"time: correct typos, remove incorrect tags, etc. This way, we won't have to",
"on meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1202/11365) that our tags are not in great shape, to say the",
"when bumping an old post for retagging (or when someone else bumps an",
"* when bumping an old post for retagging (or when someone else bumps",
"questions tagged 'graduate-school'\") are beyond the scope of this particular post, and need",
"of to minimize disruption: * only bump 5-6 old posts at a time",
"posts near the top. (i.e. don't everybody go on tagging sprees at the",
"to fix something else. * fix tags on new questions immediately when they're",
"*very* disruptive to regular operations on this site, I've been taking any steps",
"retags are *very* disruptive to regular operations on this site, I've been taking",
"Does anyone have any other comments or suggestions on how to minimize disruption",
"any other comments or suggestions on how to minimize disruption when cleaning up",
"*major* discussion on meta before anyone acts on them. But some (very small)",
"our tags are not in great shape, to say the least. Big tags",
"tags are not in great shape, to say the least. Big tags like",
"post for retagging (or when someone else bumps an old post), fix everything",
"bumps an old post), fix everything else that's wrong with the post at",
"There has been general agreement [here on meta](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1202/11365) that our tags are not",
"else. * fix tags on new questions immediately when they're asked. Does anyone",
"been working on some of these lately. Given that mass retags are *very*",
"correct typos, remove incorrect tags, etc. This way, we won't have to bump",
"everything else that's wrong with the post at the same time: correct typos,",
"meta before anyone acts on them. But some (very small) tags lend themselves",
"say the least. Big tags like [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school",
"lend themselves easily to cleanup with just a few retags. I've been working",
"steps I can think of to minimize disruption: * only bump 5-6 old",
"tags on new questions immediately when they're asked. Does anyone have any other",
"don't everybody go on tagging sprees at the same time) * when bumping",
"post, and need *major* discussion on meta before anyone acts on them. But",
"just a few retags. I've been working on some of these lately. Given",
"when the front page (in 'active' view) doesn't already have a bunch of",
"on some of these lately. Given that mass retags are *very* disruptive to",
"acts on them. But some (very small) tags lend themselves easily to cleanup",
"at the same time: correct typos, remove incorrect tags, etc. This way, we",
"fix everything else that's wrong with the post at the same time: correct",
"to regular operations on this site, I've been taking any steps I can",
"* only bump old posts when the front page (in 'active' view) doesn't",
"go on tagging sprees at the same time) * when bumping an old",
"same time) * when bumping an old post for retagging (or when someone",
"bumping an old post for retagging (or when someone else bumps an old",
"\"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\") are beyond the scope of this particular post, and"
] |
[
"consider: * Are these edits beneficial overall when they cause an old post",
"to consider: * Are these edits beneficial overall when they cause an old",
"several things to consider: * Are these edits beneficial overall when they cause",
"them has less than 2k rep, so that the edit will be queued",
"the practice in general. The question is about editing posts that mention widely",
"the front page? * Are these edits beneficial overall when the question is",
"on [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365). I'm not asking about that particular post, but about the",
"known sites by name, to make them \"clickable\" links. For example, changing >",
"2k rep, so that the edit will be queued and consume reviewer resources?",
"comment thread on [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365). I'm not asking about that particular post, but",
"to a comment thread on [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365). I'm not asking about that particular",
"make them \"clickable\" links. For example, changing > > Twitter > > >",
"the question is already on the front page? * Are these edits beneficial",
"posts that mention widely known sites by name, to make them \"clickable\" links.",
"these edits beneficial overall when the user making them has less than 2k",
"less than 2k rep, so that the edit will be queued and consume",
"are several things to consider: * Are these edits beneficial overall when they",
"The question is about editing posts that mention widely known sites by name,",
"> There are several things to consider: * Are these edits beneficial overall",
"front page? * Are these edits beneficial overall when the question is already",
"name, to make them \"clickable\" links. For example, changing > > Twitter >",
"For example, changing > > Twitter > > > to > > [Twitter](http://twitter.com)",
"* Are these edits beneficial overall when the question is already on the",
"Are these edits beneficial overall when the question is already on the front",
"Are these edits beneficial overall when the user making them has less than",
"when the user making them has less than 2k rep, so that the",
"about that particular post, but about the practice in general. The question is",
"about the practice in general. The question is about editing posts that mention",
"overall when the user making them has less than 2k rep, so that",
"a comment thread on [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365). I'm not asking about that particular post,",
"when the question is already on the front page? * Are these edits",
"these edits beneficial overall when the question is already on the front page?",
"on the front page? * Are these edits beneficial overall when the user",
"post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365). I'm not asking about that particular post, but about the practice in",
"[this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365). I'm not asking about that particular post, but about the practice",
"edits beneficial overall when they cause an old post to be bumped to",
"to the front page? * Are these edits beneficial overall when the question",
"widely known sites by name, to make them \"clickable\" links. For example, changing",
"making them has less than 2k rep, so that the edit will be",
"is about editing posts that mention widely known sites by name, to make",
"cause an old post to be bumped to the front page? * Are",
"> > Twitter > > > to > > [Twitter](http://twitter.com) > > >",
"that particular post, but about the practice in general. The question is about",
"things to consider: * Are these edits beneficial overall when they cause an",
"an old post to be bumped to the front page? * Are these",
"about editing posts that mention widely known sites by name, to make them",
"page? * Are these edits beneficial overall when the question is already on",
"they cause an old post to be bumped to the front page? *",
"> Twitter > > > to > > [Twitter](http://twitter.com) > > > There",
"changing > > Twitter > > > to > > [Twitter](http://twitter.com) > >",
"* Are these edits beneficial overall when they cause an old post to",
"old post to be bumped to the front page? * Are these edits",
"am raising this question in response to a comment thread on [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365).",
"has less than 2k rep, so that the edit will be queued and",
"page? * Are these edits beneficial overall when the user making them has",
"general. The question is about editing posts that mention widely known sites by",
"to > > [Twitter](http://twitter.com) > > > There are several things to consider:",
"edits beneficial overall when the question is already on the front page? *",
"raising this question in response to a comment thread on [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365). I'm",
"to make them \"clickable\" links. For example, changing > > Twitter > >",
"thread on [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365). I'm not asking about that particular post, but about",
"mention widely known sites by name, to make them \"clickable\" links. For example,",
"than 2k rep, so that the edit will be queued and consume reviewer",
"> > > There are several things to consider: * Are these edits",
"particular post, but about the practice in general. The question is about editing",
"in general. The question is about editing posts that mention widely known sites",
"[Twitter](http://twitter.com) > > > There are several things to consider: * Are these",
"response to a comment thread on [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365). I'm not asking about that",
"I am raising this question in response to a comment thread on [this",
"> [Twitter](http://twitter.com) > > > There are several things to consider: * Are",
"front page? * Are these edits beneficial overall when the user making them",
"> > [Twitter](http://twitter.com) > > > There are several things to consider: *",
"beneficial overall when they cause an old post to be bumped to the",
"the user making them has less than 2k rep, so that the edit",
"bumped to the front page? * Are these edits beneficial overall when the",
"I'm not asking about that particular post, but about the practice in general.",
"beneficial overall when the question is already on the front page? * Are",
"these edits beneficial overall when they cause an old post to be bumped",
"edits beneficial overall when the user making them has less than 2k rep,",
"post, but about the practice in general. The question is about editing posts",
"that mention widely known sites by name, to make them \"clickable\" links. For",
"overall when the question is already on the front page? * Are these",
"this question in response to a comment thread on [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365). I'm not",
"by name, to make them \"clickable\" links. For example, changing > > Twitter",
"Are these edits beneficial overall when they cause an old post to be",
"example, changing > > Twitter > > > to > > [Twitter](http://twitter.com) >",
"be bumped to the front page? * Are these edits beneficial overall when",
"post to be bumped to the front page? * Are these edits beneficial",
"question is about editing posts that mention widely known sites by name, to",
"user making them has less than 2k rep, so that the edit will",
"* Are these edits beneficial overall when the user making them has less",
"There are several things to consider: * Are these edits beneficial overall when",
"but about the practice in general. The question is about editing posts that",
"to be bumped to the front page? * Are these edits beneficial overall",
"the front page? * Are these edits beneficial overall when the user making",
"links. For example, changing > > Twitter > > > to > >",
"> > to > > [Twitter](http://twitter.com) > > > There are several things",
"is already on the front page? * Are these edits beneficial overall when",
"question is already on the front page? * Are these edits beneficial overall",
"question in response to a comment thread on [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365). I'm not asking",
"asking about that particular post, but about the practice in general. The question",
"in response to a comment thread on [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/24048/11365). I'm not asking about",
"sites by name, to make them \"clickable\" links. For example, changing > >",
"not asking about that particular post, but about the practice in general. The",
"already on the front page? * Are these edits beneficial overall when the",
"beneficial overall when the user making them has less than 2k rep, so",
"> > > to > > [Twitter](http://twitter.com) > > > There are several",
"overall when they cause an old post to be bumped to the front",
"Twitter > > > to > > [Twitter](http://twitter.com) > > > There are",
"\"clickable\" links. For example, changing > > Twitter > > > to >",
"> to > > [Twitter](http://twitter.com) > > > There are several things to",
"editing posts that mention widely known sites by name, to make them \"clickable\"",
"them \"clickable\" links. For example, changing > > Twitter > > > to",
"when they cause an old post to be bumped to the front page?",
"practice in general. The question is about editing posts that mention widely known",
"> > There are several things to consider: * Are these edits beneficial"
] |
[
"subject or theoretical concept. > > > Should we have both tags, as",
"as an academic subject or theoretical concept. > > > Should we have",
"Relates to the method and practice of teaching, especially as an academic subject",
"questions tagged 'teachers'\") as a synonym. Now, a [pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy \"show questions tagged 'pedagogy'\")",
"teaching, especially as an academic subject or theoretical concept. > > > Should",
"the method and practice of teaching, especially as an academic subject or theoretical",
"We currently have a [teaching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teaching \"show questions tagged 'teaching'\") tag used on 265",
"has been created and applied to 1 question. Its wiki excerpt is: >",
"theoretical concept. > > > Should we have both tags, as they are",
"concept. > > > Should we have both tags, as they are currently",
"on 265 questions, with the following wiki excerpt: > > This tag is",
"[teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers \"show questions tagged 'teachers'\") as a synonym. Now, a [pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy \"show questions",
"tag has been created and applied to 1 question. Its wiki excerpt is:",
"a [pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy \"show questions tagged 'pedagogy'\") tag has been created and applied to",
"> Relates to the method and practice of teaching, especially as an academic",
"duties of a teacher, an academic instructor, tutor or a teaching assistant. >",
"Now, a [pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy \"show questions tagged 'pedagogy'\") tag has been created and applied",
"tag used on 265 questions, with the following wiki excerpt: > > This",
"and is also has [teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers \"show questions tagged 'teachers'\") as a synonym. Now,",
"to the method and practice of teaching, especially as an academic subject or",
"Its wiki excerpt is: > > Relates to the method and practice of",
"the role and duties of a teacher, an academic instructor, tutor or a",
"and practice of teaching, especially as an academic subject or theoretical concept. >",
"tagged 'teachers'\") as a synonym. Now, a [pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy \"show questions tagged 'pedagogy'\") tag",
"\"show questions tagged 'teaching'\") tag used on 265 questions, with the following wiki",
"applied to 1 question. Its wiki excerpt is: > > Relates to the",
"an academic instructor, tutor or a teaching assistant. > > > and is",
"\"show questions tagged 'pedagogy'\") tag has been created and applied to 1 question.",
"[pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy \"show questions tagged 'pedagogy'\") tag has been created and applied to 1",
"> > Relates to the method and practice of teaching, especially as an",
"following wiki excerpt: > > This tag is related to the role and",
"a teacher, an academic instructor, tutor or a teaching assistant. > > >",
"questions tagged 'pedagogy'\") tag has been created and applied to 1 question. Its",
"with the following wiki excerpt: > > This tag is related to the",
"a synonym. Now, a [pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy \"show questions tagged 'pedagogy'\") tag has been created",
"especially as an academic subject or theoretical concept. > > > Should we",
"excerpt is: > > Relates to the method and practice of teaching, especially",
"or a teaching assistant. > > > and is also has [teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers \"show",
"synonym. Now, a [pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy \"show questions tagged 'pedagogy'\") tag has been created and",
"questions, with the following wiki excerpt: > > This tag is related to",
"[teaching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teaching \"show questions tagged 'teaching'\") tag used on 265 questions, with the following",
"\"show questions tagged 'teachers'\") as a synonym. Now, a [pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy \"show questions tagged",
"'teaching'\") tag used on 265 questions, with the following wiki excerpt: > >",
"have a [teaching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teaching \"show questions tagged 'teaching'\") tag used on 265 questions, with",
"academic instructor, tutor or a teaching assistant. > > > and is also",
"has [teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers \"show questions tagged 'teachers'\") as a synonym. Now, a [pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy \"show",
"'teachers'\") as a synonym. Now, a [pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy \"show questions tagged 'pedagogy'\") tag has",
"or theoretical concept. > > > Should we have both tags, as they",
"tagged 'teaching'\") tag used on 265 questions, with the following wiki excerpt: >",
"and duties of a teacher, an academic instructor, tutor or a teaching assistant.",
"'pedagogy'\") tag has been created and applied to 1 question. Its wiki excerpt",
"is: > > Relates to the method and practice of teaching, especially as",
"instructor, tutor or a teaching assistant. > > > and is also has",
"related to the role and duties of a teacher, an academic instructor, tutor",
"wiki excerpt is: > > Relates to the method and practice of teaching,",
"to 1 question. Its wiki excerpt is: > > Relates to the method",
"teaching assistant. > > > and is also has [teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers \"show questions tagged",
"the following wiki excerpt: > > This tag is related to the role",
"of a teacher, an academic instructor, tutor or a teaching assistant. > >",
"teacher, an academic instructor, tutor or a teaching assistant. > > > and",
"is related to the role and duties of a teacher, an academic instructor,",
"and applied to 1 question. Its wiki excerpt is: > > Relates to",
"practice of teaching, especially as an academic subject or theoretical concept. > >",
"wiki excerpt: > > This tag is related to the role and duties",
"currently have a [teaching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teaching \"show questions tagged 'teaching'\") tag used on 265 questions,",
"This tag is related to the role and duties of a teacher, an",
"an academic subject or theoretical concept. > > > Should we have both",
"used on 265 questions, with the following wiki excerpt: > > This tag",
"questions tagged 'teaching'\") tag used on 265 questions, with the following wiki excerpt:",
"question. Its wiki excerpt is: > > Relates to the method and practice",
"also has [teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers \"show questions tagged 'teachers'\") as a synonym. Now, a [pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy",
"> This tag is related to the role and duties of a teacher,",
"to the role and duties of a teacher, an academic instructor, tutor or",
"is also has [teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers \"show questions tagged 'teachers'\") as a synonym. Now, a",
"tagged 'pedagogy'\") tag has been created and applied to 1 question. Its wiki",
"role and duties of a teacher, an academic instructor, tutor or a teaching",
"method and practice of teaching, especially as an academic subject or theoretical concept.",
"> > > and is also has [teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers \"show questions tagged 'teachers'\") as",
"> and is also has [teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers \"show questions tagged 'teachers'\") as a synonym.",
"> > This tag is related to the role and duties of a",
"a [teaching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teaching \"show questions tagged 'teaching'\") tag used on 265 questions, with the",
"tag is related to the role and duties of a teacher, an academic",
"been created and applied to 1 question. Its wiki excerpt is: > >",
"of teaching, especially as an academic subject or theoretical concept. > > >",
"academic subject or theoretical concept. > > > Should we have both tags,",
"> > > Should we have both tags, as they are currently defined?",
"assistant. > > > and is also has [teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers \"show questions tagged 'teachers'\")",
"created and applied to 1 question. Its wiki excerpt is: > > Relates",
"excerpt: > > This tag is related to the role and duties of",
"> > and is also has [teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers \"show questions tagged 'teachers'\") as a",
"265 questions, with the following wiki excerpt: > > This tag is related",
"1 question. Its wiki excerpt is: > > Relates to the method and",
"as a synonym. Now, a [pedagogy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/pedagogy \"show questions tagged 'pedagogy'\") tag has been",
"a teaching assistant. > > > and is also has [teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers \"show questions",
"tutor or a teaching assistant. > > > and is also has [teachers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/teachers"
] |
[
"[tag excerpt](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/reputation/info) about [reputation](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reputation \"show questions tagged 'reputation'\"); > > The perception of",
"recent question about the reputation of individuals; [How to judge the reputation of",
"influencing reputation. > > > it seems that this tag only covers questions",
"group or professor for good quality research for PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re) this question comes to",
"> > The perception of the quality of a journal, conference, or university",
"'reputation'\"); > > The perception of the quality of a journal, conference, or",
"of a journal, conference, or university > by a specific community or the",
"the reputation of individuals; [How to judge the reputation of a research group",
"covers questions about reputation of journals and research institutes; all *but* individuals. By",
"a specific community or the general public. Also: how reputation > develops and",
"``` Does this tag cover questions about persons too? ``` If it should",
"of journals and research institutes; all *but* individuals. By reading a recent question",
"perception of the quality of a journal, conference, or university > by a",
"reputation of individuals; [How to judge the reputation of a research group or",
"only covers questions about reputation of journals and research institutes; all *but* individuals.",
"> develops and factors influencing reputation. > > > it seems that this",
"it should not be used, the question should be edited and if it",
"research group or professor for good quality research for PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re) this question comes",
"factors influencing reputation. > > > it seems that this tag only covers",
"questions about persons too? ``` If it should not be used, the question",
"how reputation > develops and factors influencing reputation. > > > it seems",
"the [tag excerpt](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/reputation/info) about [reputation](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reputation \"show questions tagged 'reputation'\"); > > The perception",
"[How to judge the reputation of a research group or professor for good",
"the question should be edited and if it is allowed on the questions",
"the reputation of a research group or professor for good quality research for",
"mind that; ``` Does this tag cover questions about persons too? ``` If",
"question comes to mind that; ``` Does this tag cover questions about persons",
"By reading the [tag excerpt](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/reputation/info) about [reputation](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reputation \"show questions tagged 'reputation'\"); > >",
"for PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re) this question comes to mind that; ``` Does this tag cover",
"excerpt](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/reputation/info) about [reputation](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reputation \"show questions tagged 'reputation'\"); > > The perception of the",
"develops and factors influencing reputation. > > > it seems that this tag",
"this tag only covers questions about reputation of journals and research institutes; all",
"this question comes to mind that; ``` Does this tag cover questions about",
"about persons too? ``` If it should not be used, the question should",
"used, the question should be edited and if it is allowed on the",
"the quality of a journal, conference, or university > by a specific community",
"research institutes; all *but* individuals. By reading a recent question about the reputation",
"reputation. > > > it seems that this tag only covers questions about",
"specific community or the general public. Also: how reputation > develops and factors",
"is allowed on the questions about people's reputation, we should change this tag's",
"reputation of journals and research institutes; all *but* individuals. By reading a recent",
"tag cover questions about persons too? ``` If it should not be used,",
"tag only covers questions about reputation of journals and research institutes; all *but*",
"> > it seems that this tag only covers questions about reputation of",
"> The perception of the quality of a journal, conference, or university >",
"research for PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re) this question comes to mind that; ``` Does this tag",
"journal, conference, or university > by a specific community or the general public.",
"reputation > develops and factors influencing reputation. > > > it seems that",
"of individuals; [How to judge the reputation of a research group or professor",
"a journal, conference, or university > by a specific community or the general",
"cover questions about persons too? ``` If it should not be used, the",
"conference, or university > by a specific community or the general public. Also:",
"not be used, the question should be edited and if it is allowed",
"tagged 'reputation'\"); > > The perception of the quality of a journal, conference,",
"question should be edited and if it is allowed on the questions about",
"> it seems that this tag only covers questions about reputation of journals",
"a research group or professor for good quality research for PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re) this question",
"too? ``` If it should not be used, the question should be edited",
"of a research group or professor for good quality research for PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re) this",
"If it should not be used, the question should be edited and if",
"PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re) this question comes to mind that; ``` Does this tag cover questions",
"public. Also: how reputation > develops and factors influencing reputation. > > >",
"``` If it should not be used, the question should be edited and",
"edited and if it is allowed on the questions about people's reputation, we",
"Does this tag cover questions about persons too? ``` If it should not",
"that this tag only covers questions about reputation of journals and research institutes;",
"> by a specific community or the general public. Also: how reputation >",
"or university > by a specific community or the general public. Also: how",
"Also: how reputation > develops and factors influencing reputation. > > > it",
"\"show questions tagged 'reputation'\"); > > The perception of the quality of a",
"[reputation](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reputation \"show questions tagged 'reputation'\"); > > The perception of the quality of",
"about the reputation of individuals; [How to judge the reputation of a research",
"about reputation of journals and research institutes; all *but* individuals. By reading a",
"individuals. By reading a recent question about the reputation of individuals; [How to",
"quality of a journal, conference, or university > by a specific community or",
"all *but* individuals. By reading a recent question about the reputation of individuals;",
"question about the reputation of individuals; [How to judge the reputation of a",
"judge the reputation of a research group or professor for good quality research",
"reading the [tag excerpt](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/reputation/info) about [reputation](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reputation \"show questions tagged 'reputation'\"); > > The",
"professor for good quality research for PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re) this question comes to mind that;",
"it is allowed on the questions about people's reputation, we should change this",
"and factors influencing reputation. > > > it seems that this tag only",
"reading a recent question about the reputation of individuals; [How to judge the",
"university > by a specific community or the general public. Also: how reputation",
"it seems that this tag only covers questions about reputation of journals and",
"questions tagged 'reputation'\"); > > The perception of the quality of a journal,",
"general public. Also: how reputation > develops and factors influencing reputation. > >",
"journals and research institutes; all *but* individuals. By reading a recent question about",
"and research institutes; all *but* individuals. By reading a recent question about the",
"about [reputation](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reputation \"show questions tagged 'reputation'\"); > > The perception of the quality",
"or the general public. Also: how reputation > develops and factors influencing reputation.",
"or professor for good quality research for PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re) this question comes to mind",
"this tag cover questions about persons too? ``` If it should not be",
"good quality research for PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re) this question comes to mind that; ``` Does",
"> > > it seems that this tag only covers questions about reputation",
"community or the general public. Also: how reputation > develops and factors influencing",
"be edited and if it is allowed on the questions about people's reputation,",
"By reading a recent question about the reputation of individuals; [How to judge",
"a recent question about the reputation of individuals; [How to judge the reputation",
"for good quality research for PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re) this question comes to mind that; ```",
"if it is allowed on the questions about people's reputation, we should change",
"by a specific community or the general public. Also: how reputation > develops",
"of the quality of a journal, conference, or university > by a specific",
"*but* individuals. By reading a recent question about the reputation of individuals; [How",
"to mind that; ``` Does this tag cover questions about persons too? ```",
"allowed on the questions about people's reputation, we should change this tag's excerpt.",
"that; ``` Does this tag cover questions about persons too? ``` If it",
"should not be used, the question should be edited and if it is",
"to judge the reputation of a research group or professor for good quality",
"seems that this tag only covers questions about reputation of journals and research",
"The perception of the quality of a journal, conference, or university > by",
"should be edited and if it is allowed on the questions about people's",
"the general public. Also: how reputation > develops and factors influencing reputation. >",
"institutes; all *but* individuals. By reading a recent question about the reputation of",
"reputation of a research group or professor for good quality research for PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re)",
"be used, the question should be edited and if it is allowed on",
"and if it is allowed on the questions about people's reputation, we should",
"quality research for PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28827/how-to-judge-the-reputation-of-a-research-group-or-professor-for-good-quality-re) this question comes to mind that; ``` Does this",
"individuals; [How to judge the reputation of a research group or professor for",
"questions about reputation of journals and research institutes; all *but* individuals. By reading",
"persons too? ``` If it should not be used, the question should be",
"comes to mind that; ``` Does this tag cover questions about persons too?"
] |
[
"Some of these older questions have problems such as tags, typos, etc and",
"to the [Newest Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest) page and read all the newest ones. I think",
"can move to the [Newest Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest) page and read all the newest ones.",
"have older questions be bumped to the active list; some of these questions",
"more than one or two years. Most of newer users may have not",
"may see them in the active list and edit them as well. ```",
"the newest questions asked on Academia, he can move to the [Newest Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest)",
"the top active list of questions by editing them. If somebody wants to",
"and edit them as well. ``` Could you please declare me, what harms",
"ones. I think it's a good feature to have older questions be bumped",
"and inactive questions to the active questions list have to site? and what",
"not understand what is wrong with bumping older questions to the top active",
"somebody wants to reach the newest questions asked on Academia, he can move",
"of newer users may have not read such questions. They can read them",
"``` Could you please declare me, what harms can bumping older and inactive",
"older questions be bumped to the active list; some of these questions have",
"questions to the top active list of questions by editing them. If somebody",
"list of questions by editing them. If somebody wants to reach the newest",
"bumped to the active list; some of these questions have been inactive for",
"is wrong with bumping older questions to the top active list of questions",
"questions by editing them. If somebody wants to reach the newest questions asked",
"reach the newest questions asked on Academia, he can move to the [Newest",
"the [Newest Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest) page and read all the newest ones. I think it's",
"move to the [Newest Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest) page and read all the newest ones. I",
"he can move to the [Newest Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest) page and read all the newest",
"Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest) page and read all the newest ones. I think it's a good",
"some of these questions have been inactive for more than one or two",
"well. ``` Could you please declare me, what harms can bumping older and",
"newest ones. I think it's a good feature to have older questions be",
"bumping older and inactive questions to the active questions list have to site?",
"be bumped to the active list; some of these questions have been inactive",
"as well. ``` Could you please declare me, what harms can bumping older",
"questions to the active questions list have to site? and what benefits has",
"them and answer some of them. Some of these older questions have problems",
"questions be bumped to the active list; some of these questions have been",
"two years. Most of newer users may have not read such questions. They",
"etc and users may see them in the active list and edit them",
"all the newest ones. I think it's a good feature to have older",
"If somebody wants to reach the newest questions asked on Academia, he can",
"and answer some of them. Some of these older questions have problems such",
"read such questions. They can read them and answer some of them. Some",
"them. Some of these older questions have problems such as tags, typos, etc",
"me, what harms can bumping older and inactive questions to the active questions",
"to have older questions be bumped to the active list; some of these",
"with bumping older questions to the top active list of questions by editing",
"as tags, typos, etc and users may see them in the active list",
"questions have problems such as tags, typos, etc and users may see them",
"questions asked on Academia, he can move to the [Newest Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest) page and",
"what is wrong with bumping older questions to the top active list of",
"good feature to have older questions be bumped to the active list; some",
"to reach the newest questions asked on Academia, he can move to the",
"can bumping older and inactive questions to the active questions list have to",
"wrong with bumping older questions to the top active list of questions by",
"by editing them. If somebody wants to reach the newest questions asked on",
"I think it's a good feature to have older questions be bumped to",
"may have not read such questions. They can read them and answer some",
"for more than one or two years. Most of newer users may have",
"feature to have older questions be bumped to the active list; some of",
"of these older questions have problems such as tags, typos, etc and users",
"of questions by editing them. If somebody wants to reach the newest questions",
"years. Most of newer users may have not read such questions. They can",
"edit them as well. ``` Could you please declare me, what harms can",
"please declare me, what harms can bumping older and inactive questions to the",
"older questions have problems such as tags, typos, etc and users may see",
"some of them. Some of these older questions have problems such as tags,",
"the active list; some of these questions have been inactive for more than",
"newer users may have not read such questions. They can read them and",
"inactive questions to the active questions list have to site? and what benefits",
"in the active list and edit them as well. ``` Could you please",
"typos, etc and users may see them in the active list and edit",
"on Academia, he can move to the [Newest Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest) page and read all",
"questions. They can read them and answer some of them. Some of these",
"list; some of these questions have been inactive for more than one or",
"asked on Academia, he can move to the [Newest Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest) page and read",
"the newest ones. I think it's a good feature to have older questions",
"older questions to the top active list of questions by editing them. If",
"top active list of questions by editing them. If somebody wants to reach",
"not read such questions. They can read them and answer some of them.",
"list and edit them as well. ``` Could you please declare me, what",
"[Newest Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest) page and read all the newest ones. I think it's a",
"active questions list have to site? and what benefits has not-bumping to the",
"a good feature to have older questions be bumped to the active list;",
"have problems such as tags, typos, etc and users may see them in",
"active list and edit them as well. ``` Could you please declare me,",
"questions list have to site? and what benefits has not-bumping to the Academia?",
"read them and answer some of them. Some of these older questions have",
"the active list and edit them as well. ``` Could you please declare",
"than one or two years. Most of newer users may have not read",
"these older questions have problems such as tags, typos, etc and users may",
"can not understand what is wrong with bumping older questions to the top",
"declare me, what harms can bumping older and inactive questions to the active",
"them. If somebody wants to reach the newest questions asked on Academia, he",
"have not read such questions. They can read them and answer some of",
"Most of newer users may have not read such questions. They can read",
"them in the active list and edit them as well. ``` Could you",
"and read all the newest ones. I think it's a good feature to",
"to the active questions list have to site? and what benefits has not-bumping",
"active list; some of these questions have been inactive for more than one",
"users may have not read such questions. They can read them and answer",
"such as tags, typos, etc and users may see them in the active",
"of them. Some of these older questions have problems such as tags, typos,",
"list have to site? and what benefits has not-bumping to the Academia? ```",
"editing them. If somebody wants to reach the newest questions asked on Academia,",
"tags, typos, etc and users may see them in the active list and",
"problems such as tags, typos, etc and users may see them in the",
"have been inactive for more than one or two years. Most of newer",
"one or two years. Most of newer users may have not read such",
"what harms can bumping older and inactive questions to the active questions list",
"see them in the active list and edit them as well. ``` Could",
"of these questions have been inactive for more than one or two years.",
"them as well. ``` Could you please declare me, what harms can bumping",
"it's a good feature to have older questions be bumped to the active",
"been inactive for more than one or two years. Most of newer users",
"these questions have been inactive for more than one or two years. Most",
"older and inactive questions to the active questions list have to site? and",
"the active questions list have to site? and what benefits has not-bumping to",
"Academia, he can move to the [Newest Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest) page and read all the",
"or two years. Most of newer users may have not read such questions.",
"to the top active list of questions by editing them. If somebody wants",
"think it's a good feature to have older questions be bumped to the",
"They can read them and answer some of them. Some of these older",
"harms can bumping older and inactive questions to the active questions list have",
"page and read all the newest ones. I think it's a good feature",
"understand what is wrong with bumping older questions to the top active list",
"users may see them in the active list and edit them as well.",
"active list of questions by editing them. If somebody wants to reach the",
"read all the newest ones. I think it's a good feature to have",
"and users may see them in the active list and edit them as",
"Could you please declare me, what harms can bumping older and inactive questions",
"can read them and answer some of them. Some of these older questions",
"bumping older questions to the top active list of questions by editing them.",
"such questions. They can read them and answer some of them. Some of",
"wants to reach the newest questions asked on Academia, he can move to",
"newest questions asked on Academia, he can move to the [Newest Questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions?sort=newest) page",
"inactive for more than one or two years. Most of newer users may",
"questions have been inactive for more than one or two years. Most of",
"I can not understand what is wrong with bumping older questions to the",
"to the active list; some of these questions have been inactive for more",
"you please declare me, what harms can bumping older and inactive questions to",
"answer some of them. Some of these older questions have problems such as"
] |
[
"a rough outline of how I would like to re-word the question: >",
"would like to do PhD-level research in computational linguistics and natural language processing.",
"subfields of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics. I also know that research",
"necessary or helpful in studying comp ling and NLP, and is there one",
"statistics. I also know that research in comp ling and NLP is done",
"> What background is necessary to do research in computational linguistics? > =========================================================================",
"can be reopened; since I clearly missed something when I was writing the",
"[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1). I'd like to improve the question by generalizing it so it",
"on my proposed changes. Here's a rough outline of how I would like",
"between comp ling and NLP is pretty blurry, which is why I mention",
"my question.) > > > I'd like to know if there's any more",
"studying comp ling and NLP, and is there one field among those four",
"language processing? Which areas of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics are necessary",
"Ideally, what background knowledge should someone have in order to do research in",
"what background knowledge should someone have in order to do research in computational",
"is there one field among those four which is overall more necessary than",
"language processing. I know that these two fields are very interdisciplinary and draw",
"of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics. I also know that research in",
"it so it can be reopened; since I clearly missed something when I",
"math, and statistics are necessary or helpful in studying comp ling and NLP,",
"> > What background is necessary to do research in computational linguistics? >",
"ready to enter graduate school, and I would like to do PhD-level research",
"processing? Which areas of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics are necessary or",
"these two fields are very interdisciplinary and draw on various subfields of linguistics,",
"a little bit confused, since it didn't seem particularly more situation-specific than [this",
"and I would like to do PhD-level research in computational linguistics and natural",
"know if there's any more room for improvement, if this looks like a",
"comp ling and NLP, and is there one field among those four which",
"like to re-word the question: > > What background is necessary to do",
"linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics are necessary or helpful in studying comp",
"very interdisciplinary and draw on various subfields of linguistics, computer science, math, and",
"improvement, if this looks like a valid, on-topic question, or if there's no",
"> > > I'd like to know if there's any more room for",
"linguistics department. > > > Ideally, what background knowledge should someone have in",
"linguistics or natural language processing? Which areas of linguistics, computer science, math, and",
"schools having it in the CS department, and some in the linguistics department.",
"if this looks like a valid, on-topic question, or if there's no saving",
"the CS department, and some in the linguistics department. > > > Ideally,",
"than the others? > > > (Note: per [this question from Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com), the",
"to know if there's any more room for improvement, if this looks like",
"situation. I admit I'm a little bit confused, since it didn't seem particularly",
"on-topic question, or if there's no saving this question and I should delete",
"those four which is overall more necessary than the others? > > >",
"> > I'm getting ready to enter graduate school, and I would like",
"seem particularly more situation-specific than [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1). I'd like to improve the question",
"generalizing it so it can be reopened; since I clearly missed something when",
"when I was writing the question, I'd like some feedback on my proposed",
"various subfields of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics. I also know that",
"is overall more necessary than the others? > > > (Note: per [this",
"more necessary than the others? > > > (Note: per [this question from",
"looks like a valid, on-topic question, or if there's no saving this question",
"helpful in studying comp ling and NLP, and is there one field among",
"for being too specific to my situation. I admit I'm a little bit",
"the question: > > What background is necessary to do research in computational",
"draw on various subfields of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics. I also",
"have in order to do research in computational linguistics or natural language processing?",
"recently posted [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29122/i-want-to-study-computational-linguistics-and-nlp-which-program-to-enter), which was closed as off-topic for being too specific",
"specific to my situation. I admit I'm a little bit confused, since it",
"NLP, and is there one field among those four which is overall more",
"if there's any more room for improvement, if this looks like a valid,",
"is done in different departments at different schools, with some schools having it",
"since I clearly missed something when I was writing the question, I'd like",
"done in different departments at different schools, with some schools having it in",
"from Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com), the distinction between comp ling and NLP is pretty blurry, which",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29122/i-want-to-study-computational-linguistics-and-nlp-which-program-to-enter), which was closed as off-topic for being too specific to my situation.",
"I recently posted [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29122/i-want-to-study-computational-linguistics-and-nlp-which-program-to-enter), which was closed as off-topic for being too",
"natural language processing. I know that these two fields are very interdisciplinary and",
"I would like to re-word the question: > > What background is necessary",
"know that these two fields are very interdisciplinary and draw on various subfields",
"since it didn't seem particularly more situation-specific than [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1). I'd like to",
"do research in computational linguistics? > ========================================================================= > > > I'm getting ready",
"I'm a little bit confused, since it didn't seem particularly more situation-specific than",
"science, math, and statistics are necessary or helpful in studying comp ling and",
"posted [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29122/i-want-to-study-computational-linguistics-and-nlp-which-program-to-enter), which was closed as off-topic for being too specific to",
"ling and NLP is pretty blurry, which is why I mention both in",
"feedback on my proposed changes. Here's a rough outline of how I would",
"that research in comp ling and NLP is done in different departments at",
"question: > > What background is necessary to do research in computational linguistics?",
"I clearly missed something when I was writing the question, I'd like some",
"outline of how I would like to re-word the question: > > What",
"blurry, which is why I mention both in my question.) > > >",
"of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics are necessary or helpful in studying",
"both in my question.) > > > I'd like to know if there's",
"being too specific to my situation. I admit I'm a little bit confused,",
"math, and statistics. I also know that research in comp ling and NLP",
"it in the CS department, and some in the linguistics department. > >",
"Which areas of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics are necessary or helpful",
"the question by generalizing it so it can be reopened; since I clearly",
"the linguistics department. > > > Ideally, what background knowledge should someone have",
"and draw on various subfields of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics. I",
"than [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1). I'd like to improve the question by generalizing it so",
"it can be reopened; since I clearly missed something when I was writing",
"NLP is pretty blurry, which is why I mention both in my question.)",
"in computational linguistics and natural language processing. I know that these two fields",
"in computational linguistics or natural language processing? Which areas of linguistics, computer science,",
"too specific to my situation. I admit I'm a little bit confused, since",
"someone have in order to do research in computational linguistics or natural language",
"like some feedback on my proposed changes. Here's a rough outline of how",
"among those four which is overall more necessary than the others? > >",
"also know that research in comp ling and NLP is done in different",
"computational linguistics? > ========================================================================= > > > I'm getting ready to enter graduate",
"writing the question, I'd like some feedback on my proposed changes. Here's a",
"interdisciplinary and draw on various subfields of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics.",
"with some schools having it in the CS department, and some in the",
"department. > > > Ideally, what background knowledge should someone have in order",
"to do research in computational linguistics or natural language processing? Which areas of",
"there one field among those four which is overall more necessary than the",
"> > > (Note: per [this question from Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com), the distinction between comp",
"and statistics are necessary or helpful in studying comp ling and NLP, and",
"any more room for improvement, if this looks like a valid, on-topic question,",
"to re-word the question: > > What background is necessary to do research",
"overall more necessary than the others? > > > (Note: per [this question",
"one field among those four which is overall more necessary than the others?",
"necessary to do research in computational linguistics? > ========================================================================= > > > I'm",
"others? > > > (Note: per [this question from Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com), the distinction between",
"as off-topic for being too specific to my situation. I admit I'm a",
"situation-specific than [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1). I'd like to improve the question by generalizing it",
"school, and I would like to do PhD-level research in computational linguistics and",
"this looks like a valid, on-topic question, or if there's no saving this",
"enter graduate school, and I would like to do PhD-level research in computational",
"the question, I'd like some feedback on my proposed changes. Here's a rough",
"and natural language processing. I know that these two fields are very interdisciplinary",
"I'd like some feedback on my proposed changes. Here's a rough outline of",
"processing. I know that these two fields are very interdisciplinary and draw on",
"computer science, math, and statistics. I also know that research in comp ling",
"background knowledge should someone have in order to do research in computational linguistics",
"I'm getting ready to enter graduate school, and I would like to do",
"like to improve the question by generalizing it so it can be reopened;",
"> > > Ideally, what background knowledge should someone have in order to",
"it didn't seem particularly more situation-specific than [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1). I'd like to improve",
"> > Ideally, what background knowledge should someone have in order to do",
"was writing the question, I'd like some feedback on my proposed changes. Here's",
"I would like to do PhD-level research in computational linguistics and natural language",
"What background is necessary to do research in computational linguistics? > ========================================================================= >",
"so it can be reopened; since I clearly missed something when I was",
"different departments at different schools, with some schools having it in the CS",
"areas of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics are necessary or helpful in",
"linguistics? > ========================================================================= > > > I'm getting ready to enter graduate school,",
"bit confused, since it didn't seem particularly more situation-specific than [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1). I'd",
"and statistics. I also know that research in comp ling and NLP is",
"in the CS department, and some in the linguistics department. > > >",
"computer science, math, and statistics are necessary or helpful in studying comp ling",
"confused, since it didn't seem particularly more situation-specific than [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1). I'd like",
"natural language processing? Which areas of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics are",
"which was closed as off-topic for being too specific to my situation. I",
"something when I was writing the question, I'd like some feedback on my",
"in order to do research in computational linguistics or natural language processing? Which",
"there's any more room for improvement, if this looks like a valid, on-topic",
"research in computational linguistics? > ========================================================================= > > > I'm getting ready to",
"and NLP is done in different departments at different schools, with some schools",
"little bit confused, since it didn't seem particularly more situation-specific than [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1).",
"research in computational linguistics and natural language processing. I know that these two",
"(Note: per [this question from Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com), the distinction between comp ling and NLP",
"reopened; since I clearly missed something when I was writing the question, I'd",
"comp ling and NLP is done in different departments at different schools, with",
"CS department, and some in the linguistics department. > > > Ideally, what",
"improve the question by generalizing it so it can be reopened; since I",
"knowledge should someone have in order to do research in computational linguistics or",
"in my question.) > > > I'd like to know if there's any",
"for improvement, if this looks like a valid, on-topic question, or if there's",
"having it in the CS department, and some in the linguistics department. >",
"distinction between comp ling and NLP is pretty blurry, which is why I",
"department, and some in the linguistics department. > > > Ideally, what background",
"should someone have in order to do research in computational linguistics or natural",
"computational linguistics or natural language processing? Which areas of linguistics, computer science, math,",
"the distinction between comp ling and NLP is pretty blurry, which is why",
"valid, on-topic question, or if there's no saving this question and I should",
"PhD-level research in computational linguistics and natural language processing. I know that these",
"field among those four which is overall more necessary than the others? >",
"I admit I'm a little bit confused, since it didn't seem particularly more",
"to improve the question by generalizing it so it can be reopened; since",
"and is there one field among those four which is overall more necessary",
"in the linguistics department. > > > Ideally, what background knowledge should someone",
"or natural language processing? Which areas of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics",
"mention both in my question.) > > > I'd like to know if",
"would like to re-word the question: > > What background is necessary to",
"research in comp ling and NLP is done in different departments at different",
"science, math, and statistics. I also know that research in comp ling and",
"know that research in comp ling and NLP is done in different departments",
"be reopened; since I clearly missed something when I was writing the question,",
"clearly missed something when I was writing the question, I'd like some feedback",
"missed something when I was writing the question, I'd like some feedback on",
"proposed changes. Here's a rough outline of how I would like to re-word",
"different schools, with some schools having it in the CS department, and some",
"linguistics and natural language processing. I know that these two fields are very",
"some schools having it in the CS department, and some in the linguistics",
"departments at different schools, with some schools having it in the CS department,",
"I also know that research in comp ling and NLP is done in",
"in studying comp ling and NLP, and is there one field among those",
"[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29122/i-want-to-study-computational-linguistics-and-nlp-which-program-to-enter), which was closed as off-topic for being too specific to my",
"to my situation. I admit I'm a little bit confused, since it didn't",
"I'd like to improve the question by generalizing it so it can be",
"Here's a rough outline of how I would like to re-word the question:",
"linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics. I also know that research in comp",
"at different schools, with some schools having it in the CS department, and",
"and some in the linguistics department. > > > Ideally, what background knowledge",
"ling and NLP, and is there one field among those four which is",
"> > (Note: per [this question from Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com), the distinction between comp ling",
"which is why I mention both in my question.) > > > I'd",
"admit I'm a little bit confused, since it didn't seem particularly more situation-specific",
"changes. Here's a rough outline of how I would like to re-word the",
"order to do research in computational linguistics or natural language processing? Which areas",
"four which is overall more necessary than the others? > > > (Note:",
"re-word the question: > > What background is necessary to do research in",
"question by generalizing it so it can be reopened; since I clearly missed",
"to do PhD-level research in computational linguistics and natural language processing. I know",
"more situation-specific than [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1). I'd like to improve the question by generalizing",
"why I mention both in my question.) > > > I'd like to",
"in comp ling and NLP is done in different departments at different schools,",
"like to know if there's any more room for improvement, if this looks",
"background is necessary to do research in computational linguistics? > ========================================================================= > >",
"NLP is done in different departments at different schools, with some schools having",
"> Ideally, what background knowledge should someone have in order to do research",
"ling and NLP is done in different departments at different schools, with some",
"Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com), the distinction between comp ling and NLP is pretty blurry, which is",
"more room for improvement, if this looks like a valid, on-topic question, or",
"is pretty blurry, which is why I mention both in my question.) >",
"are very interdisciplinary and draw on various subfields of linguistics, computer science, math,",
"comp ling and NLP is pretty blurry, which is why I mention both",
"to enter graduate school, and I would like to do PhD-level research in",
"pretty blurry, which is why I mention both in my question.) > >",
"was closed as off-topic for being too specific to my situation. I admit",
"statistics are necessary or helpful in studying comp ling and NLP, and is",
"question.) > > > I'd like to know if there's any more room",
"my situation. I admit I'm a little bit confused, since it didn't seem",
"a valid, on-topic question, or if there's no saving this question and I",
"of how I would like to re-word the question: > > What background",
"like a valid, on-topic question, or if there's no saving this question and",
"schools, with some schools having it in the CS department, and some in",
"do PhD-level research in computational linguistics and natural language processing. I know that",
"that these two fields are very interdisciplinary and draw on various subfields of",
"on various subfields of linguistics, computer science, math, and statistics. I also know",
"off-topic for being too specific to my situation. I admit I'm a little",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1). I'd like to improve the question by generalizing it so it can",
"two fields are very interdisciplinary and draw on various subfields of linguistics, computer",
"are necessary or helpful in studying comp ling and NLP, and is there",
"the others? > > > (Note: per [this question from Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com), the distinction",
"> I'm getting ready to enter graduate school, and I would like to",
"question from Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com), the distinction between comp ling and NLP is pretty blurry,",
"per [this question from Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com), the distinction between comp ling and NLP is",
"I'd like to know if there's any more room for improvement, if this",
"> ========================================================================= > > > I'm getting ready to enter graduate school, and",
"in computational linguistics? > ========================================================================= > > > I'm getting ready to enter",
"I know that these two fields are very interdisciplinary and draw on various",
"is necessary to do research in computational linguistics? > ========================================================================= > > >",
"I was writing the question, I'd like some feedback on my proposed changes.",
"getting ready to enter graduate school, and I would like to do PhD-level",
"which is overall more necessary than the others? > > > (Note: per",
"didn't seem particularly more situation-specific than [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1). I'd like to improve the",
"> > I'd like to know if there's any more room for improvement,",
"fields are very interdisciplinary and draw on various subfields of linguistics, computer science,",
"some in the linguistics department. > > > Ideally, what background knowledge should",
"my proposed changes. Here's a rough outline of how I would like to",
"rough outline of how I would like to re-word the question: > >",
"or helpful in studying comp ling and NLP, and is there one field",
"question, or if there's no saving this question and I should delete it.",
"========================================================================= > > > I'm getting ready to enter graduate school, and I",
"do research in computational linguistics or natural language processing? Which areas of linguistics,",
"I mention both in my question.) > > > I'd like to know",
"some feedback on my proposed changes. Here's a rough outline of how I",
"> (Note: per [this question from Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com), the distinction between comp ling and",
"to do research in computational linguistics? > ========================================================================= > > > I'm getting",
"is why I mention both in my question.) > > > I'd like",
"question, I'd like some feedback on my proposed changes. Here's a rough outline",
"[this question from Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com), the distinction between comp ling and NLP is pretty",
"> I'd like to know if there's any more room for improvement, if",
"computational linguistics and natural language processing. I know that these two fields are",
"like to do PhD-level research in computational linguistics and natural language processing. I",
"by generalizing it so it can be reopened; since I clearly missed something",
"in different departments at different schools, with some schools having it in the",
"room for improvement, if this looks like a valid, on-topic question, or if",
"closed as off-topic for being too specific to my situation. I admit I'm",
"research in computational linguistics or natural language processing? Which areas of linguistics, computer",
"and NLP, and is there one field among those four which is overall",
"and NLP is pretty blurry, which is why I mention both in my",
"necessary than the others? > > > (Note: per [this question from Linguistics.SE](https://linguistics.stackexchange.com/questions/1802/what-are-the-fundamental-differences-between-natural-language-processing-and-com),",
"particularly more situation-specific than [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17780/my-plan-to-get-into-a-cs-phd-program?lq=1). I'd like to improve the question by",
"how I would like to re-word the question: > > What background is",
"graduate school, and I would like to do PhD-level research in computational linguistics",
"> > > I'm getting ready to enter graduate school, and I would"
] |
[
"it? I'm assuming Ac.SE falls under US law, which I'm not particularly familiar",
"knowledge, this problem has not happened yet, but should we take precautionary measures?",
"conference, but there is a basically a post on our site clearly associating",
"there is a basically a post on our site clearly associating this conference",
"to the best of my knowledge, this problem has not happened yet, but",
"on our site clearly associating this conference with fake ones. What would happen",
"I was wondering what is the responsibility of the site with regard to",
"organisers would complain about it? I'm assuming Ac.SE falls under US law, which",
"I have no idea about that conference, but there is a basically a",
"under US law, which I'm not particularly familiar with, and, to the best",
"the best of my knowledge, this problem has not happened yet, but should",
"content posted by users that could potentially be defaming? This question was prompted",
"and, to the best of my knowledge, this problem has not happened yet,",
"of my knowledge, this problem has not happened yet, but should we take",
"site with regard to content posted by users that could potentially be defaming?",
"my knowledge, this problem has not happened yet, but should we take precautionary",
"This question was prompted by <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake> I have no idea about that conference,",
"best of my knowledge, this problem has not happened yet, but should we",
"but there is a basically a post on our site clearly associating this",
"conference with fake ones. What would happen if the organisers would complain about",
"basically a post on our site clearly associating this conference with fake ones.",
"happen if the organisers would complain about it? I'm assuming Ac.SE falls under",
"falls under US law, which I'm not particularly familiar with, and, to the",
"question was prompted by <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake> I have no idea about that conference, but",
"clearly associating this conference with fake ones. What would happen if the organisers",
"no idea about that conference, but there is a basically a post on",
"about it? I'm assuming Ac.SE falls under US law, which I'm not particularly",
"post on our site clearly associating this conference with fake ones. What would",
"Ac.SE falls under US law, which I'm not particularly familiar with, and, to",
"potentially be defaming? This question was prompted by <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake> I have no idea",
"by users that could potentially be defaming? This question was prompted by <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake>",
"regard to content posted by users that could potentially be defaming? This question",
"with regard to content posted by users that could potentially be defaming? This",
"what is the responsibility of the site with regard to content posted by",
"have no idea about that conference, but there is a basically a post",
"law, which I'm not particularly familiar with, and, to the best of my",
"prompted by <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake> I have no idea about that conference, but there is",
"if the organisers would complain about it? I'm assuming Ac.SE falls under US",
"with fake ones. What would happen if the organisers would complain about it?",
"of the site with regard to content posted by users that could potentially",
"by <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake> I have no idea about that conference, but there is a",
"familiar with, and, to the best of my knowledge, this problem has not",
"associating this conference with fake ones. What would happen if the organisers would",
"a basically a post on our site clearly associating this conference with fake",
"complain about it? I'm assuming Ac.SE falls under US law, which I'm not",
"<https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake> I have no idea about that conference, but there is a basically",
"could potentially be defaming? This question was prompted by <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake> I have no",
"defaming? This question was prompted by <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake> I have no idea about that",
"would complain about it? I'm assuming Ac.SE falls under US law, which I'm",
"is a basically a post on our site clearly associating this conference with",
"that conference, but there is a basically a post on our site clearly",
"What would happen if the organisers would complain about it? I'm assuming Ac.SE",
"that could potentially be defaming? This question was prompted by <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake> I have",
"particularly familiar with, and, to the best of my knowledge, this problem has",
"assuming Ac.SE falls under US law, which I'm not particularly familiar with, and,",
"responsibility of the site with regard to content posted by users that could",
"this conference with fake ones. What would happen if the organisers would complain",
"ones. What would happen if the organisers would complain about it? I'm assuming",
"US law, which I'm not particularly familiar with, and, to the best of",
"idea about that conference, but there is a basically a post on our",
"a post on our site clearly associating this conference with fake ones. What",
"which I'm not particularly familiar with, and, to the best of my knowledge,",
"I'm not particularly familiar with, and, to the best of my knowledge, this",
"about that conference, but there is a basically a post on our site",
"is the responsibility of the site with regard to content posted by users",
"not particularly familiar with, and, to the best of my knowledge, this problem",
"the site with regard to content posted by users that could potentially be",
"the responsibility of the site with regard to content posted by users that",
"users that could potentially be defaming? This question was prompted by <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake> I",
"be defaming? This question was prompted by <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake> I have no idea about",
"was prompted by <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29282/are-conferences-organized-by-iact-like-icke-fake> I have no idea about that conference, but there",
"fake ones. What would happen if the organisers would complain about it? I'm",
"would happen if the organisers would complain about it? I'm assuming Ac.SE falls",
"our site clearly associating this conference with fake ones. What would happen if",
"wondering what is the responsibility of the site with regard to content posted",
"with, and, to the best of my knowledge, this problem has not happened",
"the organisers would complain about it? I'm assuming Ac.SE falls under US law,",
"posted by users that could potentially be defaming? This question was prompted by",
"to content posted by users that could potentially be defaming? This question was",
"site clearly associating this conference with fake ones. What would happen if the",
"I'm assuming Ac.SE falls under US law, which I'm not particularly familiar with,",
"was wondering what is the responsibility of the site with regard to content"
] |
[
"somehow convinced everyone that I'm actually good at this” - how to effectively",
"convey. And I don't like just [emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions \"show questions tagged 'emotions'\"), because then",
"effectively deal with Imposter Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect) I think we need a tag to cover",
"I do to recover from a short term burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout) and [Strategies to overcome",
"for people in my situation to feel X?\", where X is: * **Lack",
"Any ideas? Note: The tag should exclude questions on dealing with *other* people",
"were similar issues with [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") until I created [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues",
"questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), [religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues \"show questions tagged 'religious-issues'\"), and [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged",
"guilty about the unfinished work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work) * **Burnout**: [What can I do to recover",
"to feel dread before starting a faculty position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position) * **Impatient**: [Is it normal",
"from textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha) * **Undeserving**: [“I've somehow convinced everyone that I'm actually good at",
"feel impatient in lectures when a lecturer explains material that could be obtained",
"**Intimidated**: [How do I stop feeling intimidated by my advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor) * **Dread**: [Is",
"dual-purpose tag. Any ideas? Note: The tag should exclude questions on dealing with",
"X?\", where X is: * **Lack of motivation**: [How to stay motivated in",
"people. We get a lot of questions here of the form \"How to",
"and [How should I deal with discouragement looking at others success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success) * **Guilt**:",
"something like: > > On emotional issues such as guilt, discouragement, jealousy, or",
"questions tagged 'healthcare'\") before I split it into [medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine \"show questions tagged 'medicine'\")",
"Note: The tag should exclude questions on dealing with *other* people who have",
"\"show questions tagged 'religious-issues'\"), and [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") in that scope.",
"to effectively deal with Imposter Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect) I think we need a tag to",
"good at this” - how to effectively deal with Imposter Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect) I think",
"It's similar to tags like [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), [religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues \"show questions",
"to feel X?\", where X is: * **Lack of motivation**: [How to stay",
"But, I have no idea what such a tag should be called. I",
"name to convey. And I don't like just [emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions \"show questions tagged 'emotions'\"),",
"know this because that's what happened to [healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare \"show questions tagged 'healthcare'\") before",
"\"Is it common for people in my situation to feel X?\", where X",
"questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") in that scope. But, I have no idea what such",
"specifically about \"dealing with the things I am feeling.\" The scope of the",
"about the unfinished work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work) * **Burnout**: [What can I do to recover from",
"common for people in my situation to feel X?\", where X is: *",
"that could be obtained from textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha) * **Undeserving**: [“I've somehow convinced everyone that",
"to feel impatient in lectures when a lecturer explains material that could be",
"would be something like: > > On emotional issues such as guilt, discouragement,",
"things I am feeling.\" The scope of the tag would be something like:",
"is required of me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me) * **Discouraged**: [How should I deal with discouragement as",
"> > It's similar to tags like [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), [religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues",
"tag name to convey. And I don't like just [emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions \"show questions tagged",
"people who have these emotions (or, who the OP thinks have these emotions)",
"just [emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions \"show questions tagged 'emotions'\"), because then it's likely to also be",
"\"show questions tagged 'emotional-issues'\") implies *abnormal* emotions, which is definitely not something I",
"from a short term burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout) and [Strategies to overcome “academic-apathy” in the final",
"be used for questions about research/study related to emotions. (I know this because",
"I think [emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues \"show questions tagged 'emotional-issues'\") implies *abnormal* emotions, which is definitely",
"related to emotions. (I know this because that's what happened to [healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare \"show",
"a short term burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout) and [Strategies to overcome “academic-apathy” in the final stages",
"in my situation to feel X?\", where X is: * **Lack of motivation**:",
"PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd) * **Intimidated**: [How do I stop feeling intimidated by my advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor) *",
"position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position) * **Impatient**: [Is it normal to feel impatient in lectures when a",
"in a low-motivated group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group) and [How to motivate myself to do more than",
"I think we need a tag to cover questions specifically about \"dealing with",
"this tag name to convey. And I don't like just [emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions \"show questions",
"discouragement, jealousy, or feelings of inadequacy affecting academics and researchers. > > >",
"On emotional issues such as guilt, discouragement, jealousy, or feelings of inadequacy affecting",
"* **Undeserving**: [“I've somehow convinced everyone that I'm actually good at this” -",
"\"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), and there were similar issues with [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions",
"in people. We get a lot of questions here of the form \"How",
"think we need a tag to cover questions specifically about \"dealing with the",
"that's what happened to [healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare \"show questions tagged 'healthcare'\") before I split it",
"as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) and [How should I deal with discouragement looking at",
"[How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) and [How should",
"[How to stop feeling guilty about the unfinished work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work) * **Burnout**: [What can",
"until I created [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\").) This would make it a",
"and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), and there were similar issues with [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law",
"to motivate myself to do more than the bare minimum that is required",
"a low-motivated group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group) and [How to motivate myself to do more than the",
"* **Intimidated**: [How do I stop feeling intimidated by my advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor) * **Dread**:",
"it common for people in my situation to feel X?\", where X is:",
"be called. I think [emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues \"show questions tagged 'emotional-issues'\") implies *abnormal* emotions, which",
"overcome “academic-apathy” in the final stages of the PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd) * **Intimidated**: [How do",
"starting a faculty position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position) * **Impatient**: [Is it normal to feel impatient in",
"of the PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd) * **Intimidated**: [How do I stop feeling intimidated by my",
"about \"dealing with the things I am feeling.\" The scope of the tag",
"'legal-issues'\") in that scope. But, I have no idea what such a tag",
"is definitely not something I want this tag name to convey. And I",
"feel dread before starting a faculty position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position) * **Impatient**: [Is it normal to",
"> > > It's similar to tags like [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"),",
"what happened to [healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare \"show questions tagged 'healthcare'\") before I split it into",
"required of me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me) * **Discouraged**: [How should I deal with discouragement as a",
"'emotional-issues'\") implies *abnormal* emotions, which is definitely not something I want this tag",
"\"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), [religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues \"show questions tagged 'religious-issues'\"), and [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions",
"lot of questions here of the form \"How to deal with feeling X?\",",
"that I'm actually good at this” - how to effectively deal with Imposter",
"**Impatient**: [Is it normal to feel impatient in lectures when a lecturer explains",
"to overcome “academic-apathy” in the final stages of the PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd) * **Intimidated**: [How",
"we need a tag to cover questions specifically about \"dealing with the things",
"emotional issues such as guilt, discouragement, jealousy, or feelings of inadequacy affecting academics",
"by my advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor) * **Dread**: [Is it normal to feel dread before starting",
"I want this tag name to convey. And I don't like just [emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions",
"to [healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare \"show questions tagged 'healthcare'\") before I split it into [medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine \"show",
"'law'\") until I created [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\").) This would make it",
"motivated in a low-motivated group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group) and [How to motivate myself to do more",
"'medicine'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), and there were similar issues with",
"would make it a bad dual-purpose tag. Any ideas? Note: The tag should",
"[How should I deal with discouragement looking at others success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success) * **Guilt**: [How",
"recover from a short term burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout) and [Strategies to overcome “academic-apathy” in the",
"it normal to feel impatient in lectures when a lecturer explains material that",
"\"show questions tagged 'law'\") until I created [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\").) This",
"questions tagged 'emotional-issues'\") implies *abnormal* emotions, which is definitely not something I want",
"tagged 'emotional-issues'\") implies *abnormal* emotions, which is definitely not something I want this",
"stages of the PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd) * **Intimidated**: [How do I stop feeling intimidated by",
"low-motivated group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group) and [How to motivate myself to do more than the bare",
"[healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare \"show questions tagged 'healthcare'\") before I split it into [medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine \"show questions",
"to convey. And I don't like just [emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions \"show questions tagged 'emotions'\"), because",
"normal to feel dread before starting a faculty position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position) * **Impatient**: [Is it",
"my situation to feel X?\", where X is: * **Lack of motivation**: [How",
"[How to stay motivated in a low-motivated group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group) and [How to motivate myself",
"[How do I stop feeling intimidated by my advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor) * **Dread**: [Is it",
"'health-issues'\"), [religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues \"show questions tagged 'religious-issues'\"), and [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") in",
"- how to effectively deal with Imposter Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect) I think we need a",
"when a lecturer explains material that could be obtained from textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha) * **Undeserving**:",
"get a lot of questions here of the form \"How to deal with",
"**Lack of motivation**: [How to stay motivated in a low-motivated group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group) and [How",
"with discouragement looking at others success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success) * **Guilt**: [How to stop feeling guilty",
"> On emotional issues such as guilt, discouragement, jealousy, or feelings of inadequacy",
"questions tagged 'legal-issues'\").) This would make it a bad dual-purpose tag. Any ideas?",
"who the OP thinks have these emotions) - these are better categorized as",
"whole range of emotions in people. We get a lot of questions here",
"deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) and [How should I deal with",
"tags like [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), [religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues \"show questions tagged 'religious-issues'\"), and",
"tag should exclude questions on dealing with *other* people who have these emotions",
"no idea what such a tag should be called. I think [emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues \"show",
"I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) and [How should I deal",
"This would make it a bad dual-purpose tag. Any ideas? Note: The tag",
"this because that's what happened to [healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare \"show questions tagged 'healthcare'\") before I",
"[religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues \"show questions tagged 'religious-issues'\"), and [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") in that",
"**Burnout**: [What can I do to recover from a short term burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout) and",
"of questions here of the form \"How to deal with feeling X?\", or",
"tagged 'religious-issues'\"), and [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") in that scope. But, I",
"for questions about research/study related to emotions. (I know this because that's what",
"like: > > On emotional issues such as guilt, discouragement, jealousy, or feelings",
"stay motivated in a low-motivated group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group) and [How to motivate myself to do",
"[emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions \"show questions tagged 'emotions'\"), because then it's likely to also be used",
"a bad dual-purpose tag. Any ideas? Note: The tag should exclude questions on",
"* **Burnout**: [What can I do to recover from a short term burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout)",
"as guilt, discouragement, jealousy, or feelings of inadequacy affecting academics and researchers. >",
"definitely not something I want this tag name to convey. And I don't",
"motivate myself to do more than the bare minimum that is required of",
"lecturer explains material that could be obtained from textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha) * **Undeserving**: [“I've somehow",
"Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect) I think we need a tag to cover questions specifically about \"dealing",
"tag to cover questions specifically about \"dealing with the things I am feeling.\"",
"to deal with feeling X?\", or \"Is it common for people in my",
"And I don't like just [emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions \"show questions tagged 'emotions'\"), because then it's",
"OP thinks have these emotions) - these are better categorized as [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show",
"should I deal with discouragement looking at others success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success) * **Guilt**: [How to",
"the final stages of the PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd) * **Intimidated**: [How do I stop feeling",
"scope. But, I have no idea what such a tag should be called.",
"the unfinished work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work) * **Burnout**: [What can I do to recover from a",
"used for questions about research/study related to emotions. (I know this because that's",
"a tag should be called. I think [emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues \"show questions tagged 'emotional-issues'\") implies",
"(or, who the OP thinks have these emotions) - these are better categorized",
"in that scope. But, I have no idea what such a tag should",
"a lecturer explains material that could be obtained from textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha) * **Undeserving**: [“I've",
"need a tag to cover questions specifically about \"dealing with the things I",
"where X is: * **Lack of motivation**: [How to stay motivated in a",
"in lectures when a lecturer explains material that could be obtained from textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha)",
"at others success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success) * **Guilt**: [How to stop feeling guilty about the unfinished",
"feeling.\" The scope of the tag would be something like: > > On",
"feel X?\", where X is: * **Lack of motivation**: [How to stay motivated",
"of inadequacy affecting academics and researchers. > > > It's similar to tags",
"explains material that could be obtained from textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha) * **Undeserving**: [“I've somehow convinced",
"group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group) and [How to motivate myself to do more than the bare minimum",
"this” - how to effectively deal with Imposter Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect) I think we need",
"a lot of questions here of the form \"How to deal with feeling",
"**Guilt**: [How to stop feeling guilty about the unfinished work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work) * **Burnout**: [What",
"inadequacy affecting academics and researchers. > > > It's similar to tags like",
"because then it's likely to also be used for questions about research/study related",
"* **Lack of motivation**: [How to stay motivated in a low-motivated group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group) and",
"have these emotions (or, who the OP thinks have these emotions) - these",
"to recover from a short term burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout) and [Strategies to overcome “academic-apathy” in",
"tag should be called. I think [emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues \"show questions tagged 'emotional-issues'\") implies *abnormal*",
"unfinished work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work) * **Burnout**: [What can I do to recover from a short",
"have these emotions) - these are better categorized as [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged",
"issues with [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") until I created [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions",
"[What can I do to recover from a short term burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout) and [Strategies",
"what such a tag should be called. I think [emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues \"show questions tagged",
"Imposter Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect) I think we need a tag to cover questions specifically about",
"I deal with discouragement looking at others success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success) * **Guilt**: [How to stop",
"with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) and [How should I deal with discouragement",
"impatient in lectures when a lecturer explains material that could be obtained from",
"* **Dread**: [Is it normal to feel dread before starting a faculty position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position)",
"and [How to motivate myself to do more than the bare minimum that",
"with *other* people who have these emotions (or, who the OP thinks have",
"questions tagged 'religious-issues'\"), and [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") in that scope. But,",
"split it into [medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine \"show questions tagged 'medicine'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged",
"graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) and [How should I deal with discouragement looking at others success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success)",
"[medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine \"show questions tagged 'medicine'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), and there",
"We get a lot of questions here of the form \"How to deal",
"cover questions specifically about \"dealing with the things I am feeling.\" The scope",
"these emotions (or, who the OP thinks have these emotions) - these are",
"make it a bad dual-purpose tag. Any ideas? Note: The tag should exclude",
"questions tagged 'law'\") until I created [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\").) This would",
"tagged 'legal-issues'\").) This would make it a bad dual-purpose tag. Any ideas? Note:",
"of the tag would be something like: > > On emotional issues such",
"\"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\").) This would make it a bad dual-purpose tag. Any",
"'health-issues'\"), and there were similar issues with [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") until",
"a tag to cover questions specifically about \"dealing with the things I am",
"\"How to deal with feeling X?\", or \"Is it common for people in",
"with Imposter Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect) I think we need a tag to cover questions specifically",
"feeling X?\", or \"Is it common for people in my situation to feel",
"or \"Is it common for people in my situation to feel X?\", where",
"am feeling.\" The scope of the tag would be something like: > >",
"myself to do more than the bare minimum that is required of me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me)",
"convinced everyone that I'm actually good at this” - how to effectively deal",
"with feeling X?\", or \"Is it common for people in my situation to",
"looking at others success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success) * **Guilt**: [How to stop feeling guilty about the",
"> > On emotional issues such as guilt, discouragement, jealousy, or feelings of",
"to do more than the bare minimum that is required of me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me) *",
"scope of the tag would be something like: > > On emotional issues",
"tagged 'law'\") until I created [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\").) This would make",
"do more than the bare minimum that is required of me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me) * **Discouraged**:",
"short term burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout) and [Strategies to overcome “academic-apathy” in the final stages of",
"I am feeling.\" The scope of the tag would be something like: >",
"X is: * **Lack of motivation**: [How to stay motivated in a low-motivated",
"questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), and there were similar issues with [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged",
"and [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") in that scope. But, I have no",
"don't like just [emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions \"show questions tagged 'emotions'\"), because then it's likely to",
"academics and researchers. > > > It's similar to tags like [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show",
"bad dual-purpose tag. Any ideas? Note: The tag should exclude questions on dealing",
"I have no idea what such a tag should be called. I think",
"questions on dealing with *other* people who have these emotions (or, who the",
"exclude questions on dealing with *other* people who have these emotions (or, who",
"“academic-apathy” in the final stages of the PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd) * **Intimidated**: [How do I",
"implies *abnormal* emotions, which is definitely not something I want this tag name",
"do to recover from a short term burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout) and [Strategies to overcome “academic-apathy”",
"deal with feeling X?\", or \"Is it common for people in my situation",
"here of the form \"How to deal with feeling X?\", or \"Is it",
"* **Guilt**: [How to stop feeling guilty about the unfinished work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work) * **Burnout**:",
"questions tagged 'emotions'\"), because then it's likely to also be used for questions",
"it normal to feel dread before starting a faculty position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position) * **Impatient**: [Is",
"[legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") in that scope. But, I have no idea",
"research/study related to emotions. (I know this because that's what happened to [healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare",
"the PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd) * **Intimidated**: [How do I stop feeling intimidated by my advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor)",
"could be obtained from textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha) * **Undeserving**: [“I've somehow convinced everyone that I'm",
"likely to also be used for questions about research/study related to emotions. (I",
"dealing with *other* people who have these emotions (or, who the OP thinks",
"**Discouraged**: [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) and [How",
"questions here of the form \"How to deal with feeling X?\", or \"Is",
"to also be used for questions about research/study related to emotions. (I know",
"into [medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine \"show questions tagged 'medicine'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), and",
"my advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor) * **Dread**: [Is it normal to feel dread before starting a",
"I stop feeling intimidated by my advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor) * **Dread**: [Is it normal to",
"'religious-issues'\"), and [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") in that scope. But, I have",
"with the things I am feeling.\" The scope of the tag would be",
"jealousy, or feelings of inadequacy affecting academics and researchers. > > > It's",
"minimum that is required of me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me) * **Discouraged**: [How should I deal with",
"[Strategies to overcome “academic-apathy” in the final stages of the PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd) * **Intimidated**:",
"and [Strategies to overcome “academic-apathy” in the final stages of the PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd) *",
"deal with Imposter Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect) I think we need a tag to cover questions",
"should exclude questions on dealing with *other* people who have these emotions (or,",
"tagged 'healthcare'\") before I split it into [medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine \"show questions tagged 'medicine'\") and",
"stop feeling guilty about the unfinished work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work) * **Burnout**: [What can I do",
"dread before starting a faculty position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position) * **Impatient**: [Is it normal to feel",
"**Undeserving**: [“I've somehow convinced everyone that I'm actually good at this” - how",
"questions about research/study related to emotions. (I know this because that's what happened",
"[Is it normal to feel impatient in lectures when a lecturer explains material",
"that is required of me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me) * **Discouraged**: [How should I deal with discouragement",
"everyone that I'm actually good at this” - how to effectively deal with",
"like just [emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions \"show questions tagged 'emotions'\"), because then it's likely to also",
"have no idea what such a tag should be called. I think [emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues",
"bare minimum that is required of me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me) * **Discouraged**: [How should I deal",
"then it's likely to also be used for questions about research/study related to",
"faculty position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position) * **Impatient**: [Is it normal to feel impatient in lectures when",
"'legal-issues'\").) This would make it a bad dual-purpose tag. Any ideas? Note: The",
"should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) and [How should I",
"created [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\").) This would make it a bad dual-purpose",
"such as guilt, discouragement, jealousy, or feelings of inadequacy affecting academics and researchers.",
"of me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me) * **Discouraged**: [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate",
"inspires a whole range of emotions in people. We get a lot of",
"do I stop feeling intimidated by my advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor) * **Dread**: [Is it normal",
"who have these emotions (or, who the OP thinks have these emotions) -",
"emotions in people. We get a lot of questions here of the form",
"how to effectively deal with Imposter Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect) I think we need a tag",
"I'm actually good at this” - how to effectively deal with Imposter Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect)",
"about research/study related to emotions. (I know this because that's what happened to",
"tagged 'health-issues'\"), and there were similar issues with [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\")",
"feeling intimidated by my advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor) * **Dread**: [Is it normal to feel dread",
"of the form \"How to deal with feeling X?\", or \"Is it common",
"motivation**: [How to stay motivated in a low-motivated group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group) and [How to motivate",
"also be used for questions about research/study related to emotions. (I know this",
"[How to motivate myself to do more than the bare minimum that is",
"feeling guilty about the unfinished work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work) * **Burnout**: [What can I do to",
"\"show questions tagged 'medicine'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), and there were",
"[Is it normal to feel dread before starting a faculty position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position) * **Impatient**:",
"emotions, which is definitely not something I want this tag name to convey.",
"form \"How to deal with feeling X?\", or \"Is it common for people",
"actually good at this” - how to effectively deal with Imposter Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect) I",
"a faculty position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position) * **Impatient**: [Is it normal to feel impatient in lectures",
"tagged 'health-issues'\"), [religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues \"show questions tagged 'religious-issues'\"), and [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\")",
"questions specifically about \"dealing with the things I am feeling.\" The scope of",
"questions tagged 'medicine'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), and there were similar",
"the OP thinks have these emotions) - these are better categorized as [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues",
"intimidated by my advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor) * **Dread**: [Is it normal to feel dread before",
"me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me) * **Discouraged**: [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student)",
"I created [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\").) This would make it a bad",
"tag would be something like: > > On emotional issues such as guilt,",
"researchers. > > > It's similar to tags like [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged",
"'emotions'\"), because then it's likely to also be used for questions about research/study",
"[legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\").) This would make it a bad dual-purpose tag.",
"issues such as guilt, discouragement, jealousy, or feelings of inadequacy affecting academics and",
"\"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") in that scope. But, I have no idea what",
"the tag would be something like: > > On emotional issues such as",
"lectures when a lecturer explains material that could be obtained from textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha) *",
"feelings of inadequacy affecting academics and researchers. > > > It's similar to",
"textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha) * **Undeserving**: [“I've somehow convinced everyone that I'm actually good at this”",
"*abnormal* emotions, which is definitely not something I want this tag name to",
"Academia inspires a whole range of emotions in people. We get a lot",
"it into [medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine \"show questions tagged 'medicine'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"),",
"final stages of the PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd) * **Intimidated**: [How do I stop feeling intimidated",
"range of emotions in people. We get a lot of questions here of",
"[health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), [religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues \"show questions tagged 'religious-issues'\"), and [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show",
"think [emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues \"show questions tagged 'emotional-issues'\") implies *abnormal* emotions, which is definitely not",
"situation to feel X?\", where X is: * **Lack of motivation**: [How to",
"ideas? Note: The tag should exclude questions on dealing with *other* people who",
"term burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout) and [Strategies to overcome “academic-apathy” in the final stages of the",
"affecting academics and researchers. > > > It's similar to tags like [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues",
"be something like: > > On emotional issues such as guilt, discouragement, jealousy,",
"normal to feel impatient in lectures when a lecturer explains material that could",
"material that could be obtained from textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha) * **Undeserving**: [“I've somehow convinced everyone",
"X?\", or \"Is it common for people in my situation to feel X?\",",
"which is definitely not something I want this tag name to convey. And",
"tag. Any ideas? Note: The tag should exclude questions on dealing with *other*",
"guilt, discouragement, jealousy, or feelings of inadequacy affecting academics and researchers. > >",
"[law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") until I created [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\").)",
"stop feeling intimidated by my advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor) * **Dread**: [Is it normal to feel",
"be obtained from textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha) * **Undeserving**: [“I've somehow convinced everyone that I'm actually",
"it's likely to also be used for questions about research/study related to emotions.",
"because that's what happened to [healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare \"show questions tagged 'healthcare'\") before I split",
"to stop feeling guilty about the unfinished work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work) * **Burnout**: [What can I",
"discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) and [How should I deal with discouragement looking",
"or feelings of inadequacy affecting academics and researchers. > > > It's similar",
"want this tag name to convey. And I don't like just [emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions \"show",
"emotions. (I know this because that's what happened to [healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare \"show questions tagged",
"to tags like [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), [religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues \"show questions tagged 'religious-issues'\"),",
"the form \"How to deal with feeling X?\", or \"Is it common for",
"discouragement looking at others success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success) * **Guilt**: [How to stop feeling guilty about",
"with [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") until I created [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged",
"a whole range of emotions in people. We get a lot of questions",
"(I know this because that's what happened to [healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare \"show questions tagged 'healthcare'\")",
"similar to tags like [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), [religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues \"show questions tagged",
"such a tag should be called. I think [emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues \"show questions tagged 'emotional-issues'\")",
"called. I think [emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues \"show questions tagged 'emotional-issues'\") implies *abnormal* emotions, which is",
"I don't like just [emotions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotions \"show questions tagged 'emotions'\"), because then it's likely",
"before I split it into [medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine \"show questions tagged 'medicine'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show",
"*other* people who have these emotions (or, who the OP thinks have these",
"similar issues with [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") until I created [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show",
"tagged 'legal-issues'\") in that scope. But, I have no idea what such a",
"not something I want this tag name to convey. And I don't like",
"emotions (or, who the OP thinks have these emotions) - these are better",
"to emotions. (I know this because that's what happened to [healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare \"show questions",
"is: * **Lack of motivation**: [How to stay motivated in a low-motivated group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group)",
"advisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/26615/how-do-i-stop-feeling-intimidated-by-my-advisor) * **Dread**: [Is it normal to feel dread before starting a faculty",
"the things I am feeling.\" The scope of the tag would be something",
"can I do to recover from a short term burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout) and [Strategies to",
"the bare minimum that is required of me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me) * **Discouraged**: [How should I",
"something I want this tag name to convey. And I don't like just",
"to cover questions specifically about \"dealing with the things I am feeling.\" The",
"\"dealing with the things I am feeling.\" The scope of the tag would",
"[emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues \"show questions tagged 'emotional-issues'\") implies *abnormal* emotions, which is definitely not something",
"deal with discouragement looking at others success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success) * **Guilt**: [How to stop feeling",
"work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work) * **Burnout**: [What can I do to recover from a short term",
"thinks have these emotions) - these are better categorized as [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions",
"on dealing with *other* people who have these emotions (or, who the OP",
"> It's similar to tags like [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), [religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues \"show",
"\"show questions tagged 'emotions'\"), because then it's likely to also be used for",
"should be called. I think [emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues \"show questions tagged 'emotional-issues'\") implies *abnormal* emotions,",
"[health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), and there were similar issues with [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show",
"there were similar issues with [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") until I created",
"than the bare minimum that is required of me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me) * **Discouraged**: [How should",
"success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success) * **Guilt**: [How to stop feeling guilty about the unfinished work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work) *",
"of motivation**: [How to stay motivated in a low-motivated group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group) and [How to",
"'healthcare'\") before I split it into [medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine \"show questions tagged 'medicine'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues",
"tagged 'medicine'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), and there were similar issues",
"in the final stages of the PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd) * **Intimidated**: [How do I stop",
"people in my situation to feel X?\", where X is: * **Lack of",
"* **Discouraged**: [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) and",
"and researchers. > > > It's similar to tags like [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions",
"that scope. But, I have no idea what such a tag should be",
"idea what such a tag should be called. I think [emotional-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/emotional-issues \"show questions",
"tagged 'emotions'\"), because then it's likely to also be used for questions about",
"happened to [healthcare](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/healthcare \"show questions tagged 'healthcare'\") before I split it into [medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine",
"before starting a faculty position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position) * **Impatient**: [Is it normal to feel impatient",
"more than the bare minimum that is required of me?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/20839/how-to-motivate-myself-to-do-more-than-the-bare-minimum-that-is-required-of-me) * **Discouraged**: [How",
"a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) and [How should I deal with discouragement looking at others",
"student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) and [How should I deal with discouragement looking at others success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success) *",
"The scope of the tag would be something like: > > On emotional",
"to stay motivated in a low-motivated group?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24372/how-to-stay-motivated-in-a-low-motivated-group) and [How to motivate myself to",
"these emotions) - these are better categorized as [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\")",
"obtained from textbooks?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12829/is-it-normal-to-feel-impatient-in-lectures-when-a-lecturer-explains-material-tha) * **Undeserving**: [“I've somehow convinced everyone that I'm actually good",
"others success?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/15457/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-looking-at-others-success) * **Guilt**: [How to stop feeling guilty about the unfinished work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17988/how-to-stop-feeling-guilty-about-the-unfinished-work)",
"at this” - how to effectively deal with Imposter Syndrome](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11765/ive-somehow-convinced-everyone-that-im-actually-good-at-this-how-to-effect) I think we",
"**Dread**: [Is it normal to feel dread before starting a faculty position?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/21345/is-it-normal-to-feel-dread-before-starting-a-faculty-position) *",
"[“I've somehow convinced everyone that I'm actually good at this” - how to",
"of emotions in people. We get a lot of questions here of the",
"like [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\"), [religious-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/religious-issues \"show questions tagged 'religious-issues'\"), and [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues",
"The tag should exclude questions on dealing with *other* people who have these",
"burnout?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7668/what-can-i-do-to-recover-from-a-short-term-burnout) and [Strategies to overcome “academic-apathy” in the final stages of the PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/10969/strategies-to-overcome-academic-apathy-in-the-final-stages-of-the-phd)",
"\"show questions tagged 'healthcare'\") before I split it into [medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine \"show questions tagged",
"I split it into [medicine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/medicine \"show questions tagged 'medicine'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions",
"it a bad dual-purpose tag. Any ideas? Note: The tag should exclude questions",
"* **Impatient**: [Is it normal to feel impatient in lectures when a lecturer",
"and there were similar issues with [law](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/law \"show questions tagged 'law'\") until I"
] |
[
"for the main site or not. A while back I asked about the",
"with peer reviewed articles). This recent question by a PhD applicant asks [Should",
"known journals in my CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv) and the answers seem to suggest that if",
"you do with peer reviewed articles). This recent question by a PhD applicant",
"not. A while back I asked about the [Value of light-to-none peer reviewed",
"in my CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv) and the answers seem to suggest that if the \"less",
"are predatory that you should avoid listing them on your CV. This seems",
"evaluating a potential PhD student. The answers all suggest I should treat them",
"if this question is appropriate for the main site or not. A while",
"essentially the same thing you do with peer reviewed articles). This recent question",
"known\" journals are predatory that you should avoid listing them on your CV.",
"avoid listing them on your CV. This seems in contradiction to the answers",
"them as any other non-peer reviewed article (which is essentially the same thing",
"in less known journals in my CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv) and the answers seem to suggest",
"any other non-peer reviewed article (which is essentially the same thing you do",
"question by a PhD applicant asks [Should I list my papers which are",
"not sure if this question is appropriate for the main site or not.",
"suggest that if the \"less known\" journals are predatory that you should avoid",
"should avoid listing them on your CV. This seems in contradiction to the",
"while back I asked about the [Value of light-to-none peer reviewed pay-to-publish articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles)",
"A while back I asked about the [Value of light-to-none peer reviewed pay-to-publish",
"about the [Value of light-to-none peer reviewed pay-to-publish articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles) when evaluating a potential",
"or not. A while back I asked about the [Value of light-to-none peer",
"list my papers which are published in less known journals in my CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv)",
"peer reviewed pay-to-publish articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles) when evaluating a potential PhD student. The answers all",
"CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv) and the answers seem to suggest that if the \"less known\" journals",
"articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles) when evaluating a potential PhD student. The answers all suggest I should",
"\"less known\" journals are predatory that you should avoid listing them on your",
"I am not sure if this question is appropriate for the main site",
"reviewed pay-to-publish articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles) when evaluating a potential PhD student. The answers all suggest",
"(which is essentially the same thing you do with peer reviewed articles). This",
"CV. This seems in contradiction to the answers I got. Is there a",
"asks [Should I list my papers which are published in less known journals",
"all suggest I should treat them as any other non-peer reviewed article (which",
"non-peer reviewed article (which is essentially the same thing you do with peer",
"This recent question by a PhD applicant asks [Should I list my papers",
"that if the \"less known\" journals are predatory that you should avoid listing",
"I asked about the [Value of light-to-none peer reviewed pay-to-publish articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles) when evaluating",
"as any other non-peer reviewed article (which is essentially the same thing you",
"PhD student. The answers all suggest I should treat them as any other",
"PhD applicant asks [Should I list my papers which are published in less",
"applicant asks [Should I list my papers which are published in less known",
"site or not. A while back I asked about the [Value of light-to-none",
"treat them as any other non-peer reviewed article (which is essentially the same",
"answers seem to suggest that if the \"less known\" journals are predatory that",
"is essentially the same thing you do with peer reviewed articles). This recent",
"is appropriate for the main site or not. A while back I asked",
"seem to suggest that if the \"less known\" journals are predatory that you",
"am not sure if this question is appropriate for the main site or",
"a PhD applicant asks [Should I list my papers which are published in",
"are published in less known journals in my CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv) and the answers seem",
"The answers all suggest I should treat them as any other non-peer reviewed",
"reviewed articles). This recent question by a PhD applicant asks [Should I list",
"main site or not. A while back I asked about the [Value of",
"my CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv) and the answers seem to suggest that if the \"less known\"",
"to the answers I got. Is there a contradiction, or am I missing",
"on your CV. This seems in contradiction to the answers I got. Is",
"sure if this question is appropriate for the main site or not. A",
"the answers seem to suggest that if the \"less known\" journals are predatory",
"articles). This recent question by a PhD applicant asks [Should I list my",
"I should treat them as any other non-peer reviewed article (which is essentially",
"papers which are published in less known journals in my CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv) and the",
"and the answers seem to suggest that if the \"less known\" journals are",
"my papers which are published in less known journals in my CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv) and",
"recent question by a PhD applicant asks [Should I list my papers which",
"pay-to-publish articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles) when evaluating a potential PhD student. The answers all suggest I",
"question is appropriate for the main site or not. A while back I",
"the \"less known\" journals are predatory that you should avoid listing them on",
"by a PhD applicant asks [Should I list my papers which are published",
"listing them on your CV. This seems in contradiction to the answers I",
"this question is appropriate for the main site or not. A while back",
"the main site or not. A while back I asked about the [Value",
"[Should I list my papers which are published in less known journals in",
"if the \"less known\" journals are predatory that you should avoid listing them",
"reviewed article (which is essentially the same thing you do with peer reviewed",
"appropriate for the main site or not. A while back I asked about",
"the same thing you do with peer reviewed articles). This recent question by",
"your CV. This seems in contradiction to the answers I got. Is there",
"them on your CV. This seems in contradiction to the answers I got.",
"answers all suggest I should treat them as any other non-peer reviewed article",
"suggest I should treat them as any other non-peer reviewed article (which is",
"other non-peer reviewed article (which is essentially the same thing you do with",
"contradiction to the answers I got. Is there a contradiction, or am I",
"a potential PhD student. The answers all suggest I should treat them as",
"predatory that you should avoid listing them on your CV. This seems in",
"back I asked about the [Value of light-to-none peer reviewed pay-to-publish articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles) when",
"to suggest that if the \"less known\" journals are predatory that you should",
"asked about the [Value of light-to-none peer reviewed pay-to-publish articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles) when evaluating a",
"do with peer reviewed articles). This recent question by a PhD applicant asks",
"article (which is essentially the same thing you do with peer reviewed articles).",
"student. The answers all suggest I should treat them as any other non-peer",
"less known journals in my CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv) and the answers seem to suggest that",
"of light-to-none peer reviewed pay-to-publish articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles) when evaluating a potential PhD student. The",
"journals are predatory that you should avoid listing them on your CV. This",
"in contradiction to the answers I got. Is there a contradiction, or am",
"published in less known journals in my CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv) and the answers seem to",
"the [Value of light-to-none peer reviewed pay-to-publish articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles) when evaluating a potential PhD",
"I list my papers which are published in less known journals in my",
"when evaluating a potential PhD student. The answers all suggest I should treat",
"[Value of light-to-none peer reviewed pay-to-publish articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles) when evaluating a potential PhD student.",
"thing you do with peer reviewed articles). This recent question by a PhD",
"potential PhD student. The answers all suggest I should treat them as any",
"peer reviewed articles). This recent question by a PhD applicant asks [Should I",
"that you should avoid listing them on your CV. This seems in contradiction",
"light-to-none peer reviewed pay-to-publish articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7908/value-of-light-to-none-peer-reviewed-pay-to-publish-articles) when evaluating a potential PhD student. The answers",
"which are published in less known journals in my CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv) and the answers",
"This seems in contradiction to the answers I got. Is there a contradiction,",
"should treat them as any other non-peer reviewed article (which is essentially the",
"same thing you do with peer reviewed articles). This recent question by a",
"you should avoid listing them on your CV. This seems in contradiction to",
"the answers I got. Is there a contradiction, or am I missing something?",
"journals in my CV?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29543/should-i-list-my-papers-which-are-published-in-less-known-journals-in-my-cv) and the answers seem to suggest that if the",
"seems in contradiction to the answers I got. Is there a contradiction, or"
] |
[
"to name names. In cases where naming names is simply to shame publishers/people,",
"do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d) the OP is considering naming the publisher and a high rep user",
"predatory journal after publication, what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d) the OP is considering naming",
"value to a question or answer, then I think it is important to",
"adds value to a question or answer, then I think it is important",
"bad publishers and researchers. If naming the publisher, journal, or researcher adds value",
"OP is considering naming the publisher and a high rep user has recommended",
"to be a place to list bad publishers and researchers. If naming the",
"think naming the publisher adds any value and I do not want AC.SE",
"is considering naming the publisher and a high rep user has recommended them",
"and I do not want AC.SE to be a place to list bad",
"not want AC.SE to be a place to list bad publishers and researchers.",
"adds any value and I do not want AC.SE to be a place",
"names is simply to shame publishers/people, I think it is a bad idea.",
"to do this. I personally do not think naming the publisher adds any",
"do this. I personally do not think naming the publisher adds any value",
"the publisher adds any value and I do not want AC.SE to be",
"cases where naming names is simply to shame publishers/people, I think it is",
"it is important to name names. In cases where naming names is simply",
"list bad publishers and researchers. If naming the publisher, journal, or researcher adds",
"recommended them to do this. I personally do not think naming the publisher",
"think it is important to name names. In cases where naming names is",
"journal, or researcher adds value to a question or answer, then I think",
"and researchers. If naming the publisher, journal, or researcher adds value to a",
"naming names is simply to shame publishers/people, I think it is a bad",
"important to name names. In cases where naming names is simply to shame",
"name names. In cases where naming names is simply to shame publishers/people, I",
"naming the publisher and a high rep user has recommended them to do",
"AC.SE to be a place to list bad publishers and researchers. If naming",
"value and I do not want AC.SE to be a place to list",
"answer, then I think it is important to name names. In cases where",
"In cases where naming names is simply to shame publishers/people, I think it",
"user has recommended them to do this. I personally do not think naming",
"want AC.SE to be a place to list bad publishers and researchers. If",
"is important to name names. In cases where naming names is simply to",
"this question: [My paper was withdrawn from predatory journal after publication, what should",
"naming the publisher, journal, or researcher adds value to a question or answer,",
"was withdrawn from predatory journal after publication, what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d) the OP",
"paper was withdrawn from predatory journal after publication, what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d) the",
"what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d) the OP is considering naming the publisher and a",
"personally do not think naming the publisher adds any value and I do",
"names. In cases where naming names is simply to shame publishers/people, I think",
"a place to list bad publishers and researchers. If naming the publisher, journal,",
"the publisher, journal, or researcher adds value to a question or answer, then",
"or answer, then I think it is important to name names. In cases",
"In this question: [My paper was withdrawn from predatory journal after publication, what",
"rep user has recommended them to do this. I personally do not think",
"them to do this. I personally do not think naming the publisher adds",
"I personally do not think naming the publisher adds any value and I",
"a question or answer, then I think it is important to name names.",
"place to list bad publishers and researchers. If naming the publisher, journal, or",
"naming the publisher adds any value and I do not want AC.SE to",
"I do not want AC.SE to be a place to list bad publishers",
"be a place to list bad publishers and researchers. If naming the publisher,",
"researcher adds value to a question or answer, then I think it is",
"after publication, what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d) the OP is considering naming the publisher",
"or researcher adds value to a question or answer, then I think it",
"from predatory journal after publication, what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d) the OP is considering",
"researchers. If naming the publisher, journal, or researcher adds value to a question",
"where naming names is simply to shame publishers/people, I think it is a",
"publisher adds any value and I do not want AC.SE to be a",
"publisher, journal, or researcher adds value to a question or answer, then I",
"question: [My paper was withdrawn from predatory journal after publication, what should I",
"and a high rep user has recommended them to do this. I personally",
"this. I personally do not think naming the publisher adds any value and",
"question or answer, then I think it is important to name names. In",
"publisher and a high rep user has recommended them to do this. I",
"should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d) the OP is considering naming the publisher and a high",
"I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d) the OP is considering naming the publisher and a high rep",
"considering naming the publisher and a high rep user has recommended them to",
"If naming the publisher, journal, or researcher adds value to a question or",
"do not think naming the publisher adds any value and I do not",
"any value and I do not want AC.SE to be a place to",
"[My paper was withdrawn from predatory journal after publication, what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d)",
"publishers and researchers. If naming the publisher, journal, or researcher adds value to",
"has recommended them to do this. I personally do not think naming the",
"a high rep user has recommended them to do this. I personally do",
"the OP is considering naming the publisher and a high rep user has",
"high rep user has recommended them to do this. I personally do not",
"I think it is important to name names. In cases where naming names",
"journal after publication, what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d) the OP is considering naming the",
"not think naming the publisher adds any value and I do not want",
"withdrawn from predatory journal after publication, what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d) the OP is",
"the publisher and a high rep user has recommended them to do this.",
"do not want AC.SE to be a place to list bad publishers and",
"publication, what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29991/my-paper-was-withdrawn-from-predatory-journal-after-publication-what-should-i-d) the OP is considering naming the publisher and",
"to list bad publishers and researchers. If naming the publisher, journal, or researcher",
"to a question or answer, then I think it is important to name",
"then I think it is important to name names. In cases where naming"
] |
[
"but I don't know where else to ask) to ask about interactions between",
"private elementary school, and we're having some trouble between one of our teachers",
"elementary school, and we're having some trouble between one of our teachers and",
"which I won't go into on meta, but would like to ask about.",
"school board for a small private elementary school, and we're having some trouble",
"would like to ask about. Would academia be an appropriate forum (doesn't seem",
"know where else to ask) to ask about interactions between faculty and staff?",
"Would academia be an appropriate forum (doesn't seem right, but I don't know",
"I don't know where else to ask) to ask about interactions between faculty",
"on meta, but would like to ask about. Would academia be an appropriate",
"into on meta, but would like to ask about. Would academia be an",
"some trouble between one of our teachers and the administrator which I won't",
"I won't go into on meta, but would like to ask about. Would",
"ask about. Would academia be an appropriate forum (doesn't seem right, but I",
"administrator which I won't go into on meta, but would like to ask",
"of our teachers and the administrator which I won't go into on meta,",
"school, and we're having some trouble between one of our teachers and the",
"don't know where else to ask) to ask about interactions between faculty and",
"teachers and the administrator which I won't go into on meta, but would",
"an appropriate forum (doesn't seem right, but I don't know where else to",
"a school board for a small private elementary school, and we're having some",
"our teachers and the administrator which I won't go into on meta, but",
"we're having some trouble between one of our teachers and the administrator which",
"on a school board for a small private elementary school, and we're having",
"and the administrator which I won't go into on meta, but would like",
"meta, but would like to ask about. Would academia be an appropriate forum",
"one of our teachers and the administrator which I won't go into on",
"academia be an appropriate forum (doesn't seem right, but I don't know where",
"for a small private elementary school, and we're having some trouble between one",
"trouble between one of our teachers and the administrator which I won't go",
"won't go into on meta, but would like to ask about. Would academia",
"having some trouble between one of our teachers and the administrator which I",
"(doesn't seem right, but I don't know where else to ask) to ask",
"seem right, but I don't know where else to ask) to ask about",
"appropriate forum (doesn't seem right, but I don't know where else to ask)",
"a small private elementary school, and we're having some trouble between one of",
"between one of our teachers and the administrator which I won't go into",
"go into on meta, but would like to ask about. Would academia be",
"forum (doesn't seem right, but I don't know where else to ask) to",
"but would like to ask about. Would academia be an appropriate forum (doesn't",
"right, but I don't know where else to ask) to ask about interactions",
"am on a school board for a small private elementary school, and we're",
"board for a small private elementary school, and we're having some trouble between",
"about. Would academia be an appropriate forum (doesn't seem right, but I don't",
"the administrator which I won't go into on meta, but would like to",
"and we're having some trouble between one of our teachers and the administrator",
"like to ask about. Would academia be an appropriate forum (doesn't seem right,",
"be an appropriate forum (doesn't seem right, but I don't know where else",
"I am on a school board for a small private elementary school, and",
"to ask about. Would academia be an appropriate forum (doesn't seem right, but",
"small private elementary school, and we're having some trouble between one of our"
] |
[
"to find the color value. Also, I am looking for the hex value.",
"blue respectively. I don't know anything about code except how to search through",
"#EFF appear to be in the home page's source code. Thanks to [color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/),",
"how to search through it by using Ctrl + F, so in addition,",
"don't know anything about code except how to search through it by using",
"source code. Thanks to [color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/), I found those colors to be black, white",
"it by using Ctrl + F, so in addition, please tell me how",
"to use the main site's background color on my personal website. #FFF, #000",
"in addition, please tell me how to find the color value. Also, I",
"I don't know anything about code except how to search through it by",
"light blue respectively. I don't know anything about code except how to search",
"search through it by using Ctrl + F, so in addition, please tell",
"F, so in addition, please tell me how to find the color value.",
"how to find the color value. Also, I am looking for the hex",
"found those colors to be black, white and light blue respectively. I don't",
"black, white and light blue respectively. I don't know anything about code except",
"be in the home page's source code. Thanks to [color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/), I found those",
"appear to be in the home page's source code. Thanks to [color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/), I",
"Thanks to [color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/), I found those colors to be black, white and light",
"white and light blue respectively. I don't know anything about code except how",
"to be in the home page's source code. Thanks to [color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/), I found",
"site's background color on my personal website. #FFF, #000 and #EFF appear to",
"page's source code. Thanks to [color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/), I found those colors to be black,",
"anything about code except how to search through it by using Ctrl +",
"background color on my personal website. #FFF, #000 and #EFF appear to be",
"code except how to search through it by using Ctrl + F, so",
"by using Ctrl + F, so in addition, please tell me how to",
"using Ctrl + F, so in addition, please tell me how to find",
"those colors to be black, white and light blue respectively. I don't know",
"in the home page's source code. Thanks to [color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/), I found those colors",
"[color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/), I found those colors to be black, white and light blue respectively.",
"except how to search through it by using Ctrl + F, so in",
"my personal website. #FFF, #000 and #EFF appear to be in the home",
"personal website. #FFF, #000 and #EFF appear to be in the home page's",
"to be black, white and light blue respectively. I don't know anything about",
"addition, please tell me how to find the color value. Also, I am",
"and light blue respectively. I don't know anything about code except how to",
"+ F, so in addition, please tell me how to find the color",
"home page's source code. Thanks to [color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/), I found those colors to be",
"the main site's background color on my personal website. #FFF, #000 and #EFF",
"#FFF, #000 and #EFF appear to be in the home page's source code.",
"and #EFF appear to be in the home page's source code. Thanks to",
"the home page's source code. Thanks to [color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/), I found those colors to",
"me how to find the color value. Also, I am looking for the",
"main site's background color on my personal website. #FFF, #000 and #EFF appear",
"please tell me how to find the color value. Also, I am looking",
"colors to be black, white and light blue respectively. I don't know anything",
"color on my personal website. #FFF, #000 and #EFF appear to be in",
"like to use the main site's background color on my personal website. #FFF,",
"through it by using Ctrl + F, so in addition, please tell me",
"know anything about code except how to search through it by using Ctrl",
"I would like to use the main site's background color on my personal",
"use the main site's background color on my personal website. #FFF, #000 and",
"would like to use the main site's background color on my personal website.",
"to [color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/), I found those colors to be black, white and light blue",
"Ctrl + F, so in addition, please tell me how to find the",
"on my personal website. #FFF, #000 and #EFF appear to be in the",
"be black, white and light blue respectively. I don't know anything about code",
"website. #FFF, #000 and #EFF appear to be in the home page's source",
"respectively. I don't know anything about code except how to search through it",
"tell me how to find the color value. Also, I am looking for",
"I found those colors to be black, white and light blue respectively. I",
"about code except how to search through it by using Ctrl + F,",
"code. Thanks to [color-hex](http://www.color-hex.com/), I found those colors to be black, white and",
"so in addition, please tell me how to find the color value. Also,",
"to search through it by using Ctrl + F, so in addition, please",
"#000 and #EFF appear to be in the home page's source code. Thanks"
] |
[
"things. If you delete a comment or make an edit that makes another",
"is easiest for the moderators if the comment is flagged as obsolete instead",
"flag comments as either \"not constructive\" or \"obsolete\" among other things. If you",
"no longer constructive, I think it is easiest for the moderators if the",
"constructive\" or \"obsolete\" among other things. If you delete a comment or make",
"longer constructive, I think it is easiest for the moderators if the comment",
"\"obsolete\" among other things. If you delete a comment or make an edit",
"it is possible to flag comments as either \"not constructive\" or \"obsolete\" among",
"When flagging comments it is possible to flag comments as either \"not constructive\"",
"or \"obsolete\" among other things. If you delete a comment or make an",
"think it is easiest for the moderators if the comment is flagged as",
"the moderators if the comment is flagged as obsolete instead of not constructive.",
"for the moderators if the comment is flagged as obsolete instead of not",
"other things. If you delete a comment or make an edit that makes",
"make an edit that makes another comment obsolete and no longer constructive, I",
"to flag comments as either \"not constructive\" or \"obsolete\" among other things. If",
"either \"not constructive\" or \"obsolete\" among other things. If you delete a comment",
"and no longer constructive, I think it is easiest for the moderators if",
"a comment or make an edit that makes another comment obsolete and no",
"comments it is possible to flag comments as either \"not constructive\" or \"obsolete\"",
"easiest for the moderators if the comment is flagged as obsolete instead of",
"flagging comments it is possible to flag comments as either \"not constructive\" or",
"obsolete and no longer constructive, I think it is easiest for the moderators",
"I think it is easiest for the moderators if the comment is flagged",
"is possible to flag comments as either \"not constructive\" or \"obsolete\" among other",
"that makes another comment obsolete and no longer constructive, I think it is",
"as either \"not constructive\" or \"obsolete\" among other things. If you delete a",
"an edit that makes another comment obsolete and no longer constructive, I think",
"If you delete a comment or make an edit that makes another comment",
"constructive, I think it is easiest for the moderators if the comment is",
"or make an edit that makes another comment obsolete and no longer constructive,",
"it is easiest for the moderators if the comment is flagged as obsolete",
"you delete a comment or make an edit that makes another comment obsolete",
"comment obsolete and no longer constructive, I think it is easiest for the",
"makes another comment obsolete and no longer constructive, I think it is easiest",
"among other things. If you delete a comment or make an edit that",
"possible to flag comments as either \"not constructive\" or \"obsolete\" among other things.",
"edit that makes another comment obsolete and no longer constructive, I think it",
"delete a comment or make an edit that makes another comment obsolete and",
"comments as either \"not constructive\" or \"obsolete\" among other things. If you delete",
"\"not constructive\" or \"obsolete\" among other things. If you delete a comment or",
"another comment obsolete and no longer constructive, I think it is easiest for",
"comment or make an edit that makes another comment obsolete and no longer"
] |
[
"\"undergraduate.\" Is this question on topic here? * Voting to close as off-topic,",
"number of master's and a significant number of doctoral degree programs include coursework,",
"still be off topic. I suspect this is a much less common issue",
"asked by a student about exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other aspects",
"there anything undergraduate-specific about questions on exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other",
"and comments along the lines of: * The course references suggest \"undergraduate.\" Is",
"studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other aspects of university-level coursework, I see flags",
"conceivable that a similar question could be asked by a graduate student who",
"suggest \"undergraduate.\" Is this question on topic here? * Voting to close as",
"off-topic, since this is a question about a problem facing an undergraduate student",
"this is a much less common issue at the graduate level (as coursework",
"about a problem facing an undergraduate student * Although it's conceivable that a",
"this question on topic here? * Voting to close as off-topic, since this",
"experience. * Well, as it pertains to undergraduate students it would still be",
"Well, as it pertains to undergraduate students it would still be off topic.",
"asked by a graduate student who had cheated, in reality this is an",
"cheated, in reality this is an extremely detailed description of a totally undergraduate",
"undergraduate experience. * Well, as it pertains to undergraduate students it would still",
"* Well, as it pertains to undergraduate students it would still be off",
"be asked by a graduate student who had cheated, in reality this is",
"less common issue at the graduate level (as coursework is less emphasized) though",
"similar question could be asked by a graduate student who had cheated, in",
"since this is a question about a problem facing an undergraduate student *",
"cheating, disputing grades, or other aspects of university-level coursework, I see flags and",
"problem facing an undergraduate student * Although it's conceivable that a similar question",
"it would still be off topic. I suspect this is a much less",
"it pertains to undergraduate students it would still be off topic. I suspect",
"this is a question about a problem facing an undergraduate student * Although",
"student who had cheated, in reality this is an extremely detailed description of",
"common issue at the graduate level (as coursework is less emphasized) though it",
"reality this is an extremely detailed description of a totally undergraduate experience. *",
"coursework, I see flags and comments along the lines of: * The course",
"and a significant number of doctoral degree programs include coursework, is there anything",
"is an extremely detailed description of a totally undergraduate experience. * Well, as",
"a large number of master's and a significant number of doctoral degree programs",
"question about a problem facing an undergraduate student * Although it's conceivable that",
"by a student about exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other aspects of",
"is less emphasized) though it is possible. Given that a large number of",
"is a much less common issue at the graduate level (as coursework is",
"detailed description of a totally undergraduate experience. * Well, as it pertains to",
"or other aspects of university-level coursework, I see flags and comments along the",
"undergraduate students it would still be off topic. I suspect this is a",
"extremely detailed description of a totally undergraduate experience. * Well, as it pertains",
"question asked by a student about exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other",
"this is an extremely detailed description of a totally undergraduate experience. * Well,",
"an undergraduate student * Although it's conceivable that a similar question could be",
"that a large number of master's and a significant number of doctoral degree",
"get a question asked by a student about exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades,",
"description of a totally undergraduate experience. * Well, as it pertains to undergraduate",
"on topic here? * Voting to close as off-topic, since this is a",
"I suspect this is a much less common issue at the graduate level",
"* Although it's conceivable that a similar question could be asked by a",
"the graduate level (as coursework is less emphasized) though it is possible. Given",
"who had cheated, in reality this is an extremely detailed description of a",
"a graduate student who had cheated, in reality this is an extremely detailed",
"is possible. Given that a large number of master's and a significant number",
"coursework is less emphasized) though it is possible. Given that a large number",
"question could be asked by a graduate student who had cheated, in reality",
"students it would still be off topic. I suspect this is a much",
"would still be off topic. I suspect this is a much less common",
"student about exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other aspects of university-level coursework,",
"as off-topic, since this is a question about a problem facing an undergraduate",
"issue at the graduate level (as coursework is less emphasized) though it is",
"question on topic here? * Voting to close as off-topic, since this is",
"other aspects of university-level coursework, I see flags and comments along the lines",
"by a graduate student who had cheated, in reality this is an extremely",
"aspects of university-level coursework, I see flags and comments along the lines of:",
"graduate level (as coursework is less emphasized) though it is possible. Given that",
"doctoral degree programs include coursework, is there anything undergraduate-specific about questions on exams,",
"large number of master's and a significant number of doctoral degree programs include",
"topic here? * Voting to close as off-topic, since this is a question",
"questions on exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other aspects of university-level coursework?",
"exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other aspects of university-level coursework, I see",
"significant number of doctoral degree programs include coursework, is there anything undergraduate-specific about",
"Is this question on topic here? * Voting to close as off-topic, since",
"suspect this is a much less common issue at the graduate level (as",
"off topic. I suspect this is a much less common issue at the",
"undergraduate student * Although it's conceivable that a similar question could be asked",
"coursework, is there anything undergraduate-specific about questions on exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades,",
"Given that a large number of master's and a significant number of doctoral",
"references suggest \"undergraduate.\" Is this question on topic here? * Voting to close",
"comments along the lines of: * The course references suggest \"undergraduate.\" Is this",
"less emphasized) though it is possible. Given that a large number of master's",
"about questions on exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other aspects of university-level",
"a question asked by a student about exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or",
"though it is possible. Given that a large number of master's and a",
"the lines of: * The course references suggest \"undergraduate.\" Is this question on",
"had cheated, in reality this is an extremely detailed description of a totally",
"that a similar question could be asked by a graduate student who had",
"as it pertains to undergraduate students it would still be off topic. I",
"along the lines of: * The course references suggest \"undergraduate.\" Is this question",
"a totally undergraduate experience. * Well, as it pertains to undergraduate students it",
"* Voting to close as off-topic, since this is a question about a",
"an extremely detailed description of a totally undergraduate experience. * Well, as it",
"topic. I suspect this is a much less common issue at the graduate",
"of a totally undergraduate experience. * Well, as it pertains to undergraduate students",
"level (as coursework is less emphasized) though it is possible. Given that a",
"emphasized) though it is possible. Given that a large number of master's and",
"it's conceivable that a similar question could be asked by a graduate student",
"course references suggest \"undergraduate.\" Is this question on topic here? * Voting to",
"graduate student who had cheated, in reality this is an extremely detailed description",
"to close as off-topic, since this is a question about a problem facing",
"a question about a problem facing an undergraduate student * Although it's conceivable",
"degree programs include coursework, is there anything undergraduate-specific about questions on exams, studying,",
"is a question about a problem facing an undergraduate student * Although it's",
"undergraduate-specific about questions on exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other aspects of",
"Although it's conceivable that a similar question could be asked by a graduate",
"it is possible. Given that a large number of master's and a significant",
"anything undergraduate-specific about questions on exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other aspects",
"of doctoral degree programs include coursework, is there anything undergraduate-specific about questions on",
"master's and a significant number of doctoral degree programs include coursework, is there",
"is there anything undergraduate-specific about questions on exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or",
"of university-level coursework, I see flags and comments along the lines of: *",
"to undergraduate students it would still be off topic. I suspect this is",
"I see flags and comments along the lines of: * The course references",
"include coursework, is there anything undergraduate-specific about questions on exams, studying, cheating, disputing",
"Whenever we get a question asked by a student about exams, studying, cheating,",
"disputing grades, or other aspects of university-level coursework, I see flags and comments",
"be off topic. I suspect this is a much less common issue at",
"could be asked by a graduate student who had cheated, in reality this",
"here? * Voting to close as off-topic, since this is a question about",
"of: * The course references suggest \"undergraduate.\" Is this question on topic here?",
"The course references suggest \"undergraduate.\" Is this question on topic here? * Voting",
"see flags and comments along the lines of: * The course references suggest",
"number of doctoral degree programs include coursework, is there anything undergraduate-specific about questions",
"Voting to close as off-topic, since this is a question about a problem",
"flags and comments along the lines of: * The course references suggest \"undergraduate.\"",
"a problem facing an undergraduate student * Although it's conceivable that a similar",
"of master's and a significant number of doctoral degree programs include coursework, is",
"programs include coursework, is there anything undergraduate-specific about questions on exams, studying, cheating,",
"grades, or other aspects of university-level coursework, I see flags and comments along",
"close as off-topic, since this is a question about a problem facing an",
"much less common issue at the graduate level (as coursework is less emphasized)",
"lines of: * The course references suggest \"undergraduate.\" Is this question on topic",
"we get a question asked by a student about exams, studying, cheating, disputing",
"a much less common issue at the graduate level (as coursework is less",
"about exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other aspects of university-level coursework, I",
"in reality this is an extremely detailed description of a totally undergraduate experience.",
"a significant number of doctoral degree programs include coursework, is there anything undergraduate-specific",
"facing an undergraduate student * Although it's conceivable that a similar question could",
"(as coursework is less emphasized) though it is possible. Given that a large",
"a student about exams, studying, cheating, disputing grades, or other aspects of university-level",
"a similar question could be asked by a graduate student who had cheated,",
"at the graduate level (as coursework is less emphasized) though it is possible.",
"student * Although it's conceivable that a similar question could be asked by",
"university-level coursework, I see flags and comments along the lines of: * The",
"pertains to undergraduate students it would still be off topic. I suspect this",
"totally undergraduate experience. * Well, as it pertains to undergraduate students it would",
"* The course references suggest \"undergraduate.\" Is this question on topic here? *",
"possible. Given that a large number of master's and a significant number of"
] |
[
"exam, how can I minimize the damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage) On the other hand, I consider",
"his comments were deleted) and it will happen again. I am not saying",
"why do we need this extended moderation here? Why can't we leave the",
"flames\" before even attempting to troll. On this assumption, deleting or wanting to",
"community, they are immediately \"shot down in flames\" before even attempting to troll.",
"really worth it? It has happened before (I think KiteMT was a little",
"deleting or wanting to delete comments, because they state that \"a cheater should",
"know that extended comment discussions are discouraged and by SE rules they should",
"he was very polite, but still why do we need this extended moderation",
"example of this situation was the recent [I was caught cheating on an",
"me) of the community (Omen) has left. Was it really worth it? It",
"by SE rules they should be continued in chat. A prime example of",
"state that \"a cheater should be punished\" or \"welcome to adulthood\" as JeffE",
"moderation here? Why can't we leave the comments as they are, if they",
"of this community, they are immediately \"shot down in flames\" before even attempting",
"should be punished\" or \"welcome to adulthood\" as JeffE said, for me really",
"not saying anything **bad** about StrongBad (get the joke) because he was very",
"more \"civilized\" SE communities, where trolls are almost non-existent and due to the",
"StrongBad (get the joke) because he was very polite, but still why do",
"down in flames\" before even attempting to troll. On this assumption, deleting or",
"they should be continued in chat. A prime example of this situation was",
"recent [I was caught cheating on an exam, how can I minimize the",
"smaller size of this community, they are immediately \"shot down in flames\" before",
"comment discussions are discouraged and by SE rules they should be continued in",
"again. I am not saying anything **bad** about StrongBad (get the joke) because",
"anything **bad** about StrongBad (get the joke) because he was very polite, but",
"the joke) because he was very polite, but still why do we need",
"in flames\" before even attempting to troll. On this assumption, deleting or wanting",
"other hand, I consider Academia SE one of the more \"civilized\" SE communities,",
"wanting to delete comments, because they state that \"a cheater should be punished\"",
"and it only resulted that a valued member (at least for me) of",
"and by SE rules they should be continued in chat. A prime example",
"are discouraged and by SE rules they should be continued in chat. A",
"comments, because they state that \"a cheater should be punished\" or \"welcome to",
"as JeffE said, for me really has no meaning. This too-much moderation is",
"a valued member (at least for me) of the community (Omen) has left.",
"it really worth it? It has happened before (I think KiteMT was a",
"KiteMT was a little bit offended after some of his comments were deleted)",
"about StrongBad (get the joke) because he was very polite, but still why",
"they state that \"a cheater should be punished\" or \"welcome to adulthood\" as",
"continued in chat. A prime example of this situation was the recent [I",
"(at least for me) of the community (Omen) has left. Was it really",
"immediately \"shot down in flames\" before even attempting to troll. On this assumption,",
"I know that extended comment discussions are discouraged and by SE rules they",
"how can I minimize the damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage) On the other hand, I consider Academia",
"only resulted that a valued member (at least for me) of the community",
"(I think KiteMT was a little bit offended after some of his comments",
"caught cheating on an exam, how can I minimize the damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage) On the",
"moderation is unnecessary here and it only resulted that a valued member (at",
"be continued in chat. A prime example of this situation was the recent",
"to delete comments, because they state that \"a cheater should be punished\" or",
"polite, but still why do we need this extended moderation here? Why can't",
"chat. A prime example of this situation was the recent [I was caught",
"be punished\" or \"welcome to adulthood\" as JeffE said, for me really has",
"resulted that a valued member (at least for me) of the community (Omen)",
"can't we leave the comments as they are, if they are not simply",
"I consider Academia SE one of the more \"civilized\" SE communities, where trolls",
"this extended moderation here? Why can't we leave the comments as they are,",
"will happen again. I am not saying anything **bad** about StrongBad (get the",
"size of this community, they are immediately \"shot down in flames\" before even",
"delete comments, because they state that \"a cheater should be punished\" or \"welcome",
"attempting to troll. On this assumption, deleting or wanting to delete comments, because",
"because they state that \"a cheater should be punished\" or \"welcome to adulthood\"",
"discouraged and by SE rules they should be continued in chat. A prime",
"member (at least for me) of the community (Omen) has left. Was it",
"me really has no meaning. This too-much moderation is unnecessary here and it",
"prime example of this situation was the recent [I was caught cheating on",
"SE one of the more \"civilized\" SE communities, where trolls are almost non-existent",
"left. Was it really worth it? It has happened before (I think KiteMT",
"Why can't we leave the comments as they are, if they are not",
"on an exam, how can I minimize the damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage) On the other hand,",
"the other hand, I consider Academia SE one of the more \"civilized\" SE",
"to troll. On this assumption, deleting or wanting to delete comments, because they",
"the community (Omen) has left. Was it really worth it? It has happened",
"need this extended moderation here? Why can't we leave the comments as they",
"It has happened before (I think KiteMT was a little bit offended after",
"\"shot down in flames\" before even attempting to troll. On this assumption, deleting",
"of the more \"civilized\" SE communities, where trolls are almost non-existent and due",
"troll. On this assumption, deleting or wanting to delete comments, because they state",
"in chat. A prime example of this situation was the recent [I was",
"extended comment discussions are discouraged and by SE rules they should be continued",
"\"civilized\" SE communities, where trolls are almost non-existent and due to the smaller",
"still why do we need this extended moderation here? Why can't we leave",
"we need this extended moderation here? Why can't we leave the comments as",
"it only resulted that a valued member (at least for me) of the",
"Was it really worth it? It has happened before (I think KiteMT was",
"are immediately \"shot down in flames\" before even attempting to troll. On this",
"JeffE said, for me really has no meaning. This too-much moderation is unnecessary",
"very polite, but still why do we need this extended moderation here? Why",
"was the recent [I was caught cheating on an exam, how can I",
"community (Omen) has left. Was it really worth it? It has happened before",
"the damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage) On the other hand, I consider Academia SE one of the",
"SE communities, where trolls are almost non-existent and due to the smaller size",
"comments were deleted) and it will happen again. I am not saying anything",
"this community, they are immediately \"shot down in flames\" before even attempting to",
"and due to the smaller size of this community, they are immediately \"shot",
"cheater should be punished\" or \"welcome to adulthood\" as JeffE said, for me",
"has left. Was it really worth it? It has happened before (I think",
"for me really has no meaning. This too-much moderation is unnecessary here and",
"a little bit offended after some of his comments were deleted) and it",
"was caught cheating on an exam, how can I minimize the damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage) On",
"situation was the recent [I was caught cheating on an exam, how can",
"it? It has happened before (I think KiteMT was a little bit offended",
"little bit offended after some of his comments were deleted) and it will",
"because he was very polite, but still why do we need this extended",
"but still why do we need this extended moderation here? Why can't we",
"they are immediately \"shot down in flames\" before even attempting to troll. On",
"are almost non-existent and due to the smaller size of this community, they",
"even attempting to troll. On this assumption, deleting or wanting to delete comments,",
"an exam, how can I minimize the damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage) On the other hand, I",
"am not saying anything **bad** about StrongBad (get the joke) because he was",
"and it will happen again. I am not saying anything **bad** about StrongBad",
"before (I think KiteMT was a little bit offended after some of his",
"almost non-existent and due to the smaller size of this community, they are",
"[I was caught cheating on an exam, how can I minimize the damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage)",
"before even attempting to troll. On this assumption, deleting or wanting to delete",
"meaning. This too-much moderation is unnecessary here and it only resulted that a",
"hand, I consider Academia SE one of the more \"civilized\" SE communities, where",
"happen again. I am not saying anything **bad** about StrongBad (get the joke)",
"**bad** about StrongBad (get the joke) because he was very polite, but still",
"after some of his comments were deleted) and it will happen again. I",
"least for me) of the community (Omen) has left. Was it really worth",
"saying anything **bad** about StrongBad (get the joke) because he was very polite,",
"bit offended after some of his comments were deleted) and it will happen",
"minimize the damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage) On the other hand, I consider Academia SE one of",
"trolls are almost non-existent and due to the smaller size of this community,",
"deleted) and it will happen again. I am not saying anything **bad** about",
"to adulthood\" as JeffE said, for me really has no meaning. This too-much",
"were deleted) and it will happen again. I am not saying anything **bad**",
"the smaller size of this community, they are immediately \"shot down in flames\"",
"was very polite, but still why do we need this extended moderation here?",
"This too-much moderation is unnecessary here and it only resulted that a valued",
"some of his comments were deleted) and it will happen again. I am",
"(Omen) has left. Was it really worth it? It has happened before (I",
"the more \"civilized\" SE communities, where trolls are almost non-existent and due to",
"that \"a cheater should be punished\" or \"welcome to adulthood\" as JeffE said,",
"discussions are discouraged and by SE rules they should be continued in chat.",
"said, for me really has no meaning. This too-much moderation is unnecessary here",
"joke) because he was very polite, but still why do we need this",
"consider Academia SE one of the more \"civilized\" SE communities, where trolls are",
"do we need this extended moderation here? Why can't we leave the comments",
"due to the smaller size of this community, they are immediately \"shot down",
"valued member (at least for me) of the community (Omen) has left. Was",
"damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage) On the other hand, I consider Academia SE one of the more",
"has no meaning. This too-much moderation is unnecessary here and it only resulted",
"is unnecessary here and it only resulted that a valued member (at least",
"\"a cheater should be punished\" or \"welcome to adulthood\" as JeffE said, for",
"of this situation was the recent [I was caught cheating on an exam,",
"or \"welcome to adulthood\" as JeffE said, for me really has no meaning.",
"where trolls are almost non-existent and due to the smaller size of this",
"adulthood\" as JeffE said, for me really has no meaning. This too-much moderation",
"too-much moderation is unnecessary here and it only resulted that a valued member",
"or wanting to delete comments, because they state that \"a cheater should be",
"one of the more \"civilized\" SE communities, where trolls are almost non-existent and",
"it will happen again. I am not saying anything **bad** about StrongBad (get",
"worth it? It has happened before (I think KiteMT was a little bit",
"extended moderation here? Why can't we leave the comments as they are, if",
"no meaning. This too-much moderation is unnecessary here and it only resulted that",
"Academia SE one of the more \"civilized\" SE communities, where trolls are almost",
"I am not saying anything **bad** about StrongBad (get the joke) because he",
"\"welcome to adulthood\" as JeffE said, for me really has no meaning. This",
"punished\" or \"welcome to adulthood\" as JeffE said, for me really has no",
"really has no meaning. This too-much moderation is unnecessary here and it only",
"I minimize the damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage) On the other hand, I consider Academia SE one",
"was a little bit offended after some of his comments were deleted) and",
"the recent [I was caught cheating on an exam, how can I minimize",
"we leave the comments as they are, if they are not simply trolling.",
"SE rules they should be continued in chat. A prime example of this",
"can I minimize the damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage) On the other hand, I consider Academia SE",
"this assumption, deleting or wanting to delete comments, because they state that \"a",
"of his comments were deleted) and it will happen again. I am not",
"that extended comment discussions are discouraged and by SE rules they should be",
"assumption, deleting or wanting to delete comments, because they state that \"a cheater",
"of the community (Omen) has left. Was it really worth it? It has",
"here? Why can't we leave the comments as they are, if they are",
"(get the joke) because he was very polite, but still why do we",
"for me) of the community (Omen) has left. Was it really worth it?",
"here and it only resulted that a valued member (at least for me)",
"happened before (I think KiteMT was a little bit offended after some of",
"unnecessary here and it only resulted that a valued member (at least for",
"rules they should be continued in chat. A prime example of this situation",
"has happened before (I think KiteMT was a little bit offended after some",
"On this assumption, deleting or wanting to delete comments, because they state that",
"should be continued in chat. A prime example of this situation was the",
"non-existent and due to the smaller size of this community, they are immediately",
"cheating on an exam, how can I minimize the damage?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30539/i-was-caught-cheating-on-an-exam-how-can-i-minimize-the-damage) On the other",
"that a valued member (at least for me) of the community (Omen) has",
"communities, where trolls are almost non-existent and due to the smaller size of",
"offended after some of his comments were deleted) and it will happen again.",
"this situation was the recent [I was caught cheating on an exam, how",
"A prime example of this situation was the recent [I was caught cheating",
"On the other hand, I consider Academia SE one of the more \"civilized\"",
"to the smaller size of this community, they are immediately \"shot down in",
"think KiteMT was a little bit offended after some of his comments were"
] |
[
"sure whether it is on-topic for this site or not. I seek advices",
"technical writing** course; but I am not sure whether it is on-topic for",
"I seek advices on how the course should be arranged and what topics",
"am not sure whether it is on-topic for this site or not. I",
"standard syllabus for a **research methods and technical writing** course; but I am",
"whether it is on-topic for this site or not. I seek advices on",
"how the course should be arranged and what topics should be covered in",
"on-topic for this site or not. I seek advices on how the course",
"for this site or not. I seek advices on how the course should",
"it is on-topic for this site or not. I seek advices on how",
"not. I seek advices on how the course should be arranged and what",
"but I am not sure whether it is on-topic for this site or",
"question about a standard syllabus for a **research methods and technical writing** course;",
"I want to ask a question about a standard syllabus for a **research",
"to ask a question about a standard syllabus for a **research methods and",
"seek advices on how the course should be arranged and what topics should",
"this site or not. I seek advices on how the course should be",
"or not. I seek advices on how the course should be arranged and",
"**research methods and technical writing** course; but I am not sure whether it",
"for a **research methods and technical writing** course; but I am not sure",
"want to ask a question about a standard syllabus for a **research methods",
"ask a question about a standard syllabus for a **research methods and technical",
"the course should be arranged and what topics should be covered in it.",
"a question about a standard syllabus for a **research methods and technical writing**",
"a **research methods and technical writing** course; but I am not sure whether",
"advices on how the course should be arranged and what topics should be",
"writing** course; but I am not sure whether it is on-topic for this",
"on how the course should be arranged and what topics should be covered",
"course; but I am not sure whether it is on-topic for this site",
"site or not. I seek advices on how the course should be arranged",
"and technical writing** course; but I am not sure whether it is on-topic",
"is on-topic for this site or not. I seek advices on how the",
"a standard syllabus for a **research methods and technical writing** course; but I",
"about a standard syllabus for a **research methods and technical writing** course; but",
"methods and technical writing** course; but I am not sure whether it is",
"syllabus for a **research methods and technical writing** course; but I am not",
"not sure whether it is on-topic for this site or not. I seek",
"I am not sure whether it is on-topic for this site or not."
] |
[
"and edition in book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book) . These are not really about *academia* any more",
"I could not find discussion about them on meta, and they don't seem",
"apply equally to writing at all levels, particularly basic questions about particular styles,",
"these as on-topic for this site, but I could not find discussion about",
"reasonable possibility for how to format something, the answer will almost always be",
"are not really about *academia* any more than questions on proper grammar would",
"[Should the fullstop go inside or outside the brackets for Harvard in-line citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati)",
"more than one reasonable possibility for how to format something, the answer will",
"When there is more than one reasonable possibility for how to format something,",
"citation styles. For example, * [Should the fullstop go inside or outside the",
"citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati) * [How should 'van'-names be ordered in a bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography) I have never",
"levels, particularly basic questions about particular styles, such as this question about APA",
"styles, such as this question about APA style: [APA: How to cite chapter",
"particularly basic questions about particular styles, such as this question about APA style:",
"writing at all levels, particularly basic questions about particular styles, such as this",
"time to time about citation styles. For example, * [Should the fullstop go",
"something, the answer will almost always be \"follow your discipline's style manual\" or",
"in book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book) . These are not really about *academia* any more than questions",
"answer will almost always be \"follow your discipline's style manual\" or \"follow the",
"about particular styles, such as this question about APA style: [APA: How to",
"site, but I could not find discussion about them on meta, and they",
"not really about *academia* any more than questions on proper grammar would be.",
"the answer will almost always be \"follow your discipline's style manual\" or \"follow",
"I see questions from time to time about citation styles. For example, *",
"from time to time about citation styles. For example, * [Should the fullstop",
"would be. 2. When there is more than one reasonable possibility for how",
"seem to be closed very quickly. It seems to me that: 1. Many",
"that: 1. Many of these questions apply equally to writing at all levels,",
". These are not really about *academia* any more than questions on proper",
"a bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography) I have never really seen these as on-topic for this site,",
"[How should 'van'-names be ordered in a bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography) I have never really seen",
"very quickly. It seems to me that: 1. Many of these questions apply",
"them on meta, and they don't seem to be closed very quickly. It",
"be \"follow your discipline's style manual\" or \"follow the instructions of the journal\"",
"there is more than one reasonable possibility for how to format something, the",
"on proper grammar would be. 2. When there is more than one reasonable",
"will almost always be \"follow your discipline's style manual\" or \"follow the instructions",
"at all levels, particularly basic questions about particular styles, such as this question",
"the brackets for Harvard in-line citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati) * [How should 'van'-names be ordered in",
"don't seem to be closed very quickly. It seems to me that: 1.",
"Many of these questions apply equally to writing at all levels, particularly basic",
"be closed very quickly. It seems to me that: 1. Many of these",
"inside or outside the brackets for Harvard in-line citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati) * [How should 'van'-names",
"I have never really seen these as on-topic for this site, but I",
"It seems to me that: 1. Many of these questions apply equally to",
"on-topic for this site, but I could not find discussion about them on",
"have never really seen these as on-topic for this site, but I could",
"about citation styles. For example, * [Should the fullstop go inside or outside",
"is more than one reasonable possibility for how to format something, the answer",
"seen these as on-topic for this site, but I could not find discussion",
"proper grammar would be. 2. When there is more than one reasonable possibility",
"to me that: 1. Many of these questions apply equally to writing at",
"questions about particular styles, such as this question about APA style: [APA: How",
"about *academia* any more than questions on proper grammar would be. 2. When",
"than one reasonable possibility for how to format something, the answer will almost",
"for how to format something, the answer will almost always be \"follow your",
"example, * [Should the fullstop go inside or outside the brackets for Harvard",
"the fullstop go inside or outside the brackets for Harvard in-line citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati) *",
"find discussion about them on meta, and they don't seem to be closed",
"all levels, particularly basic questions about particular styles, such as this question about",
"APA style: [APA: How to cite chapter and edition in book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book) . These",
"almost always be \"follow your discipline's style manual\" or \"follow the instructions of",
"but I could not find discussion about them on meta, and they don't",
"be. 2. When there is more than one reasonable possibility for how to",
"such as this question about APA style: [APA: How to cite chapter and",
"this question about APA style: [APA: How to cite chapter and edition in",
"* [Should the fullstop go inside or outside the brackets for Harvard in-line",
"should 'van'-names be ordered in a bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography) I have never really seen these",
"in-line citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati) * [How should 'van'-names be ordered in a bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography) I have",
"fullstop go inside or outside the brackets for Harvard in-line citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati) * [How",
"to time about citation styles. For example, * [Should the fullstop go inside",
"one reasonable possibility for how to format something, the answer will almost always",
"how to format something, the answer will almost always be \"follow your discipline's",
"to cite chapter and edition in book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book) . These are not really about",
"they don't seem to be closed very quickly. It seems to me that:",
"never really seen these as on-topic for this site, but I could not",
"particular styles, such as this question about APA style: [APA: How to cite",
"brackets for Harvard in-line citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati) * [How should 'van'-names be ordered in a",
"meta, and they don't seem to be closed very quickly. It seems to",
"to format something, the answer will almost always be \"follow your discipline's style",
"For example, * [Should the fullstop go inside or outside the brackets for",
"grammar would be. 2. When there is more than one reasonable possibility for",
"to writing at all levels, particularly basic questions about particular styles, such as",
"to be closed very quickly. It seems to me that: 1. Many of",
"These are not really about *academia* any more than questions on proper grammar",
"[APA: How to cite chapter and edition in book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book) . These are not",
"about them on meta, and they don't seem to be closed very quickly.",
"more than questions on proper grammar would be. 2. When there is more",
"on meta, and they don't seem to be closed very quickly. It seems",
"always be \"follow your discipline's style manual\" or \"follow the instructions of the",
"as this question about APA style: [APA: How to cite chapter and edition",
"chapter and edition in book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book) . These are not really about *academia* any",
"not find discussion about them on meta, and they don't seem to be",
"Harvard in-line citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati) * [How should 'van'-names be ordered in a bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography) I",
"possibility for how to format something, the answer will almost always be \"follow",
"time about citation styles. For example, * [Should the fullstop go inside or",
"'van'-names be ordered in a bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography) I have never really seen these as",
"of these questions apply equally to writing at all levels, particularly basic questions",
"bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography) I have never really seen these as on-topic for this site, but",
"question about APA style: [APA: How to cite chapter and edition in book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book)",
"questions on proper grammar would be. 2. When there is more than one",
"be ordered in a bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography) I have never really seen these as on-topic",
"edition in book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book) . These are not really about *academia* any more than",
"me that: 1. Many of these questions apply equally to writing at all",
"go inside or outside the brackets for Harvard in-line citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati) * [How should",
"2. When there is more than one reasonable possibility for how to format",
"quickly. It seems to me that: 1. Many of these questions apply equally",
"styles. For example, * [Should the fullstop go inside or outside the brackets",
"discussion about them on meta, and they don't seem to be closed very",
"these questions apply equally to writing at all levels, particularly basic questions about",
"style: [APA: How to cite chapter and edition in book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book) . These are",
"see questions from time to time about citation styles. For example, * [Should",
"equally to writing at all levels, particularly basic questions about particular styles, such",
"cite chapter and edition in book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book) . These are not really about *academia*",
"seems to me that: 1. Many of these questions apply equally to writing",
"basic questions about particular styles, such as this question about APA style: [APA:",
"really about *academia* any more than questions on proper grammar would be. 2.",
"*academia* any more than questions on proper grammar would be. 2. When there",
"questions from time to time about citation styles. For example, * [Should the",
"in a bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography) I have never really seen these as on-topic for this",
"How to cite chapter and edition in book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book) . These are not really",
"book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book) . These are not really about *academia* any more than questions on",
"any more than questions on proper grammar would be. 2. When there is",
"or outside the brackets for Harvard in-line citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati) * [How should 'van'-names be",
"really seen these as on-topic for this site, but I could not find",
"this site, but I could not find discussion about them on meta, and",
"as on-topic for this site, but I could not find discussion about them",
"could not find discussion about them on meta, and they don't seem to",
"about APA style: [APA: How to cite chapter and edition in book](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/13801/apa-how-to-cite-chapter-and-edition-in-book) .",
"and they don't seem to be closed very quickly. It seems to me",
"ordered in a bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography) I have never really seen these as on-topic for",
"* [How should 'van'-names be ordered in a bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography) I have never really",
"closed very quickly. It seems to me that: 1. Many of these questions",
"1. Many of these questions apply equally to writing at all levels, particularly",
"outside the brackets for Harvard in-line citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati) * [How should 'van'-names be ordered",
"for Harvard in-line citations?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31024/should-the-fullstop-go-inside-or-outside-the-brackets-for-harvard-in-line-citati) * [How should 'van'-names be ordered in a bibliography?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8870/how-should-van-names-be-ordered-in-a-bibliography)",
"format something, the answer will almost always be \"follow your discipline's style manual\"",
"for this site, but I could not find discussion about them on meta,",
"than questions on proper grammar would be. 2. When there is more than",
"questions apply equally to writing at all levels, particularly basic questions about particular"
] |
[
"\"What are the legal issues surrounding [some academic behavior]?\" There are many examples",
"[legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") tag. There are also examples of legal questions",
"legal issues surrounding [some academic behavior]?\" There are many examples of such questions",
"[Are there any laws against professors publishing scientific papers without acknowledging student's contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno)",
"more generally, \"Is [specific behavior related to academia] legal?\" or \"What are the",
"to questions asking more generally, \"Is [specific behavior related to academia] legal?\" or",
"during a defense, is this legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions) (this was closed, then reopened after it",
"we don't generally close hypothetical questions if they are perfectly feasible, as this",
"issue appears to be that it asks about legal issues. Inconsistency like this",
"from \"legal\" to \"ethical\") In both of these examples, the behavior in question",
"as this one is. So the issue appears to be that it asks",
"appears to be that it asks about legal issues. Inconsistency like this is",
"close to the situation can give an objectively correct answer.\") I am referring",
"legal questions. For example, * [Are there any laws against professors publishing scientific",
"professors publishing scientific papers without acknowledging student's contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno) * [Panelist hacks my system",
"their question is on topic, and it makes it difficult for not-so-new users",
"vote to close. I would therefore like to raise this issue for community",
"a particular situation (these would certainly be off topic as \"too localized\" or",
"only someone close to the situation can give an objectively correct answer.\") I",
"off topic as legal questions. For example, * [Are there any laws against",
"\"legal\" to \"ethical\") In both of these examples, the behavior in question is",
"[some academic behavior]?\" There are many examples of such questions in the [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues",
"on topic, and it makes it difficult for not-so-new users to judge when",
"academia] legal?\" or \"What are the legal issues surrounding [some academic behavior]?\" There",
"like this is bad; it makes it difficult for new users to understand",
"my system during a defense, is this legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions) (this was closed, then reopened",
"can give an objectively correct answer.\") I am referring to questions asking more",
"closed, then reopened after it was changed from \"legal\" to \"ethical\") In both",
"generally, \"Is [specific behavior related to academia] legal?\" or \"What are the legal",
"to raise this issue for community discussion: **Are questions on legal issues related",
"on legal issues related to academia. I am not referring to questions asking",
"to questions on legal issues related to academia. I am not referring to",
"users to judge when to vote to close. I would therefore like to",
"issues surrounding [some academic behavior]?\" There are many examples of such questions in",
"example, * [Are there any laws against professors publishing scientific papers without acknowledging",
"respect to questions on legal issues related to academia. I am not referring",
"the [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") tag. There are also examples of legal",
"tags, e.g. [visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa \"show questions tagged 'visa'\"). At the same time, we've closed",
"papers without acknowledging student's contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno) * [Panelist hacks my system during a defense,",
"this legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions) (this was closed, then reopened after it was changed from \"legal\"",
"asking more generally, \"Is [specific behavior related to academia] legal?\" or \"What are",
"for the first one also mentions that it is a hypothetical question; but",
"one also mentions that it is a hypothetical question; but we don't generally",
"to understand whether their question is on topic, and it makes it difficult",
"close. I would therefore like to raise this issue for community discussion: **Are",
"examples of legal questions in other tags, e.g. [visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa \"show questions tagged 'visa'\").",
"hacks my system during a defense, is this legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions) (this was closed, then",
"am not referring to questions asking for legal advice for a particular situation",
"is this legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions) (this was closed, then reopened after it was changed from",
"questions on legal issues related to academia. I am not referring to questions",
"being off topic as legal questions. For example, * [Are there any laws",
"scientific papers without acknowledging student's contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno) * [Panelist hacks my system during a",
"localized\" or \"seeks advice for a very specific situation, so that only someone",
"difficult for new users to understand whether their question is on topic, and",
"hypothetical question; but we don't generally close hypothetical questions if they are perfectly",
"seem just like those, for being off topic as legal questions. For example,",
"mentions that it is a hypothetical question; but we don't generally close hypothetical",
"issue for community discussion: **Are questions on legal issues related to academia on",
"these examples, the behavior in question is clearly related to academia. The close",
"So the issue appears to be that it asks about legal issues. Inconsistency",
"\"seeks advice for a very specific situation, so that only someone close to",
"* [Are there any laws against professors publishing scientific papers without acknowledging student's",
"that it is a hypothetical question; but we don't generally close hypothetical questions",
"legal questions in other tags, e.g. [visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa \"show questions tagged 'visa'\"). At the",
"topic, and it makes it difficult for not-so-new users to judge when to",
"questions asking for legal advice for a particular situation (these would certainly be",
"with respect to questions on legal issues related to academia. I am not",
"in the [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") tag. There are also examples of",
"reason for the first one also mentions that it is a hypothetical question;",
"for a particular situation (these would certainly be off topic as \"too localized\"",
"the behavior in question is clearly related to academia. The close reason for",
"correct answer.\") I am referring to questions asking more generally, \"Is [specific behavior",
"of such questions in the [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") tag. There are",
"about legal issues. Inconsistency like this is bad; it makes it difficult for",
"very inconsistent policy with respect to questions on legal issues related to academia.",
"is bad; it makes it difficult for new users to understand whether their",
"e.g. [visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa \"show questions tagged 'visa'\"). At the same time, we've closed questions",
"is. So the issue appears to be that it asks about legal issues.",
"(these would certainly be off topic as \"too localized\" or \"seeks advice for",
"would certainly be off topic as \"too localized\" or \"seeks advice for a",
"without acknowledging student's contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno) * [Panelist hacks my system during a defense, is",
"it makes it difficult for not-so-new users to judge when to vote to",
"questions in the [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") tag. There are also examples",
"certainly be off topic as \"too localized\" or \"seeks advice for a very",
"off topic as \"too localized\" or \"seeks advice for a very specific situation,",
"advice for a very specific situation, so that only someone close to the",
"closed questions that seem just like those, for being off topic as legal",
"examples, the behavior in question is clearly related to academia. The close reason",
"close reason for the first one also mentions that it is a hypothetical",
"not referring to questions asking for legal advice for a particular situation (these",
"one is. So the issue appears to be that it asks about legal",
"any laws against professors publishing scientific papers without acknowledging student's contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno) * [Panelist",
"The close reason for the first one also mentions that it is a",
"topic as legal questions. For example, * [Are there any laws against professors",
"defense, is this legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions) (this was closed, then reopened after it was changed",
"then reopened after it was changed from \"legal\" to \"ethical\") In both of",
"the first one also mentions that it is a hypothetical question; but we",
"makes it difficult for not-so-new users to judge when to vote to close.",
"the same time, we've closed questions that seem just like those, for being",
"questions that seem just like those, for being off topic as legal questions.",
"there any laws against professors publishing scientific papers without acknowledging student's contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno) *",
"be off topic as \"too localized\" or \"seeks advice for a very specific",
"perfectly feasible, as this one is. So the issue appears to be that",
"clearly related to academia. The close reason for the first one also mentions",
"other tags, e.g. [visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa \"show questions tagged 'visa'\"). At the same time, we've",
"We seem to have a very inconsistent policy with respect to questions on",
"so that only someone close to the situation can give an objectively correct",
"related to academia] legal?\" or \"What are the legal issues surrounding [some academic",
"laws against professors publishing scientific papers without acknowledging student's contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno) * [Panelist hacks",
"question is on topic, and it makes it difficult for not-so-new users to",
"not-so-new users to judge when to vote to close. I would therefore like",
"against professors publishing scientific papers without acknowledging student's contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno) * [Panelist hacks my",
"surrounding [some academic behavior]?\" There are many examples of such questions in the",
"legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions) (this was closed, then reopened after it was changed from \"legal\" to",
"for a very specific situation, so that only someone close to the situation",
"that seem just like those, for being off topic as legal questions. For",
"to judge when to vote to close. I would therefore like to raise",
"legal?\" or \"What are the legal issues surrounding [some academic behavior]?\" There are",
"makes it difficult for new users to understand whether their question is on",
"to the situation can give an objectively correct answer.\") I am referring to",
"after it was changed from \"legal\" to \"ethical\") In both of these examples,",
"is a hypothetical question; but we don't generally close hypothetical questions if they",
"the issue appears to be that it asks about legal issues. Inconsistency like",
"many examples of such questions in the [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") tag.",
"questions asking more generally, \"Is [specific behavior related to academia] legal?\" or \"What",
"to vote to close. I would therefore like to raise this issue for",
"they are perfectly feasible, as this one is. So the issue appears to",
"for legal advice for a particular situation (these would certainly be off topic",
"reopened after it was changed from \"legal\" to \"ethical\") In both of these",
"\"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") tag. There are also examples of legal questions in",
"tag. There are also examples of legal questions in other tags, e.g. [visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa",
"contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno) * [Panelist hacks my system during a defense, is this legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions) (this",
"questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") tag. There are also examples of legal questions in other",
"system during a defense, is this legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions) (this was closed, then reopened after",
"examples of such questions in the [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") tag. There",
"seem to have a very inconsistent policy with respect to questions on legal",
"this is bad; it makes it difficult for new users to understand whether",
"to close. I would therefore like to raise this issue for community discussion:",
"judge when to vote to close. I would therefore like to raise this",
"also mentions that it is a hypothetical question; but we don't generally close",
"answer.\") I am referring to questions asking more generally, \"Is [specific behavior related",
"that only someone close to the situation can give an objectively correct answer.\")",
"'legal-issues'\") tag. There are also examples of legal questions in other tags, e.g.",
"don't generally close hypothetical questions if they are perfectly feasible, as this one",
"objectively correct answer.\") I am referring to questions asking more generally, \"Is [specific",
"very specific situation, so that only someone close to the situation can give",
"and it makes it difficult for not-so-new users to judge when to vote",
"the legal issues surrounding [some academic behavior]?\" There are many examples of such",
"it is a hypothetical question; but we don't generally close hypothetical questions if",
"when to vote to close. I would therefore like to raise this issue",
"or \"seeks advice for a very specific situation, so that only someone close",
"academia. The close reason for the first one also mentions that it is",
"situation can give an objectively correct answer.\") I am referring to questions asking",
"in other tags, e.g. [visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa \"show questions tagged 'visa'\"). At the same time,",
"specific situation, so that only someone close to the situation can give an",
"behavior]?\" There are many examples of such questions in the [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions",
"There are also examples of legal questions in other tags, e.g. [visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa \"show",
"we've closed questions that seem just like those, for being off topic as",
"acknowledging student's contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno) * [Panelist hacks my system during a defense, is this",
"therefore like to raise this issue for community discussion: **Are questions on legal",
"(this was closed, then reopened after it was changed from \"legal\" to \"ethical\")",
"issues related to academia. I am not referring to questions asking for legal",
"new users to understand whether their question is on topic, and it makes",
"I am not referring to questions asking for legal advice for a particular",
"such questions in the [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") tag. There are also",
"to academia. I am not referring to questions asking for legal advice for",
"those, for being off topic as legal questions. For example, * [Are there",
"a hypothetical question; but we don't generally close hypothetical questions if they are",
"In both of these examples, the behavior in question is clearly related to",
"like to raise this issue for community discussion: **Are questions on legal issues",
"[specific behavior related to academia] legal?\" or \"What are the legal issues surrounding",
"changed from \"legal\" to \"ethical\") In both of these examples, the behavior in",
"\"ethical\") In both of these examples, the behavior in question is clearly related",
"I am referring to questions asking more generally, \"Is [specific behavior related to",
"I would therefore like to raise this issue for community discussion: **Are questions",
"bad; it makes it difficult for new users to understand whether their question",
"a very specific situation, so that only someone close to the situation can",
"are also examples of legal questions in other tags, e.g. [visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa \"show questions",
"both of these examples, the behavior in question is clearly related to academia.",
"generally close hypothetical questions if they are perfectly feasible, as this one is.",
"would therefore like to raise this issue for community discussion: **Are questions on",
"to have a very inconsistent policy with respect to questions on legal issues",
"of these examples, the behavior in question is clearly related to academia. The",
"are perfectly feasible, as this one is. So the issue appears to be",
"issues. Inconsistency like this is bad; it makes it difficult for new users",
"it makes it difficult for new users to understand whether their question is",
"There are many examples of such questions in the [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged",
"to academia. The close reason for the first one also mentions that it",
"* [Panelist hacks my system during a defense, is this legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions) (this was",
"difficult for not-so-new users to judge when to vote to close. I would",
"tagged 'visa'\"). At the same time, we've closed questions that seem just like",
"am referring to questions asking more generally, \"Is [specific behavior related to academia]",
"the situation can give an objectively correct answer.\") I am referring to questions",
"a very inconsistent policy with respect to questions on legal issues related to",
"just like those, for being off topic as legal questions. For example, *",
"[visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa \"show questions tagged 'visa'\"). At the same time, we've closed questions that",
"have a very inconsistent policy with respect to questions on legal issues related",
"an objectively correct answer.\") I am referring to questions asking more generally, \"Is",
"Inconsistency like this is bad; it makes it difficult for new users to",
"give an objectively correct answer.\") I am referring to questions asking more generally,",
"in question is clearly related to academia. The close reason for the first",
"are many examples of such questions in the [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\")",
"legal advice for a particular situation (these would certainly be off topic as",
"time, we've closed questions that seem just like those, for being off topic",
"to questions asking for legal advice for a particular situation (these would certainly",
"topic as \"too localized\" or \"seeks advice for a very specific situation, so",
"\"Is [specific behavior related to academia] legal?\" or \"What are the legal issues",
"close hypothetical questions if they are perfectly feasible, as this one is. So",
"is on topic, and it makes it difficult for not-so-new users to judge",
"situation (these would certainly be off topic as \"too localized\" or \"seeks advice",
"same time, we've closed questions that seem just like those, for being off",
"a defense, is this legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions) (this was closed, then reopened after it was",
"tagged 'legal-issues'\") tag. There are also examples of legal questions in other tags,",
"legal issues. Inconsistency like this is bad; it makes it difficult for new",
"was changed from \"legal\" to \"ethical\") In both of these examples, the behavior",
"this issue for community discussion: **Are questions on legal issues related to academia",
"for community discussion: **Are questions on legal issues related to academia on topic?**",
"for being off topic as legal questions. For example, * [Are there any",
"was closed, then reopened after it was changed from \"legal\" to \"ethical\") In",
"particular situation (these would certainly be off topic as \"too localized\" or \"seeks",
"question is clearly related to academia. The close reason for the first one",
"\"too localized\" or \"seeks advice for a very specific situation, so that only",
"academic behavior]?\" There are many examples of such questions in the [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show",
"questions. For example, * [Are there any laws against professors publishing scientific papers",
"advice for a particular situation (these would certainly be off topic as \"too",
"questions tagged 'visa'\"). At the same time, we've closed questions that seem just",
"publishing scientific papers without acknowledging student's contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno) * [Panelist hacks my system during",
"it was changed from \"legal\" to \"ethical\") In both of these examples, the",
"of legal questions in other tags, e.g. [visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa \"show questions tagged 'visa'\"). At",
"users to understand whether their question is on topic, and it makes it",
"academia. I am not referring to questions asking for legal advice for a",
"policy with respect to questions on legal issues related to academia. I am",
"behavior related to academia] legal?\" or \"What are the legal issues surrounding [some",
"inconsistent policy with respect to questions on legal issues related to academia. I",
"referring to questions asking for legal advice for a particular situation (these would",
"or \"What are the legal issues surrounding [some academic behavior]?\" There are many",
"to \"ethical\") In both of these examples, the behavior in question is clearly",
"At the same time, we've closed questions that seem just like those, for",
"like those, for being off topic as legal questions. For example, * [Are",
"understand whether their question is on topic, and it makes it difficult for",
"questions in other tags, e.g. [visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa \"show questions tagged 'visa'\"). At the same",
"is clearly related to academia. The close reason for the first one also",
"also examples of legal questions in other tags, e.g. [visa](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/visa \"show questions tagged",
"to be that it asks about legal issues. Inconsistency like this is bad;",
"whether their question is on topic, and it makes it difficult for not-so-new",
"questions if they are perfectly feasible, as this one is. So the issue",
"if they are perfectly feasible, as this one is. So the issue appears",
"behavior in question is clearly related to academia. The close reason for the",
"for new users to understand whether their question is on topic, and it",
"For example, * [Are there any laws against professors publishing scientific papers without",
"student's contributions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31052/are-there-any-laws-against-professors-publishing-scientific-papers-without-ackno) * [Panelist hacks my system during a defense, is this legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions)",
"'visa'\"). At the same time, we've closed questions that seem just like those,",
"legal issues related to academia. I am not referring to questions asking for",
"situation, so that only someone close to the situation can give an objectively",
"question; but we don't generally close hypothetical questions if they are perfectly feasible,",
"it asks about legal issues. Inconsistency like this is bad; it makes it",
"[Panelist hacks my system during a defense, is this legal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/28530/revisions) (this was closed,",
"as legal questions. For example, * [Are there any laws against professors publishing",
"be that it asks about legal issues. Inconsistency like this is bad; it",
"it difficult for new users to understand whether their question is on topic,",
"that it asks about legal issues. Inconsistency like this is bad; it makes",
"are the legal issues surrounding [some academic behavior]?\" There are many examples of",
"related to academia. I am not referring to questions asking for legal advice",
"related to academia. The close reason for the first one also mentions that",
"hypothetical questions if they are perfectly feasible, as this one is. So the",
"as \"too localized\" or \"seeks advice for a very specific situation, so that",
"referring to questions asking more generally, \"Is [specific behavior related to academia] legal?\"",
"asking for legal advice for a particular situation (these would certainly be off",
"raise this issue for community discussion: **Are questions on legal issues related to",
"feasible, as this one is. So the issue appears to be that it",
"\"show questions tagged 'visa'\"). At the same time, we've closed questions that seem",
"first one also mentions that it is a hypothetical question; but we don't",
"asks about legal issues. Inconsistency like this is bad; it makes it difficult",
"it difficult for not-so-new users to judge when to vote to close. I",
"someone close to the situation can give an objectively correct answer.\") I am",
"but we don't generally close hypothetical questions if they are perfectly feasible, as",
"to academia] legal?\" or \"What are the legal issues surrounding [some academic behavior]?\"",
"this one is. So the issue appears to be that it asks about",
"for not-so-new users to judge when to vote to close. I would therefore"
] |
[
"answers\", and the banner says that I cannot answer it until I have",
"rep, 1 of which came from joining and 100 of which is association",
"of which came from joining and 100 of which is association bonus. Surely",
"point of it is that it was granted because I am \"trusted elsewhere",
"\"low-quality answers\", and the banner says that I cannot answer it until I",
"rep on this site\". I have 101 rep, 1 of which came from",
"entire point of it is that it was granted because I am \"trusted",
"banner says that I cannot answer it until I have \"10 rep on",
"association bonus. Surely this bonus ought to count? The entire point of it",
"to count? The entire point of it is that it was granted because",
"\"10 rep on this site\". I have 101 rep, 1 of which came",
"is that it was granted because I am \"trusted elsewhere in the network\".",
"of it is that it was granted because I am \"trusted elsewhere in",
"protected due to supposed \"low-quality answers\", and the banner says that I cannot",
"says that I cannot answer it until I have \"10 rep on this",
"of which is association bonus. Surely this bonus ought to count? The entire",
"this site\". I have 101 rep, 1 of which came from joining and",
"The entire point of it is that it was granted because I am",
"1 of which came from joining and 100 of which is association bonus.",
"bonus. Surely this bonus ought to count? The entire point of it is",
"101 rep, 1 of which came from joining and 100 of which is",
"cannot answer it until I have \"10 rep on this site\". I have",
"which is association bonus. Surely this bonus ought to count? The entire point",
"on this site\". I have 101 rep, 1 of which came from joining",
"due to supposed \"low-quality answers\", and the banner says that I cannot answer",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31065/12378) is now protected due to supposed \"low-quality answers\", and the banner says",
"is now protected due to supposed \"low-quality answers\", and the banner says that",
"now protected due to supposed \"low-quality answers\", and the banner says that I",
"count? The entire point of it is that it was granted because I",
"answer it until I have \"10 rep on this site\". I have 101",
"100 of which is association bonus. Surely this bonus ought to count? The",
"until I have \"10 rep on this site\". I have 101 rep, 1",
"site\". I have 101 rep, 1 of which came from joining and 100",
"that I cannot answer it until I have \"10 rep on this site\".",
"and 100 of which is association bonus. Surely this bonus ought to count?",
"I have 101 rep, 1 of which came from joining and 100 of",
"this bonus ought to count? The entire point of it is that it",
"it is that it was granted because I am \"trusted elsewhere in the",
"have 101 rep, 1 of which came from joining and 100 of which",
"to supposed \"low-quality answers\", and the banner says that I cannot answer it",
"the banner says that I cannot answer it until I have \"10 rep",
"and the banner says that I cannot answer it until I have \"10",
"[This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31065/12378) is now protected due to supposed \"low-quality answers\", and the banner",
"came from joining and 100 of which is association bonus. Surely this bonus",
"Surely this bonus ought to count? The entire point of it is that",
"which came from joining and 100 of which is association bonus. Surely this",
"it until I have \"10 rep on this site\". I have 101 rep,",
"ought to count? The entire point of it is that it was granted",
"supposed \"low-quality answers\", and the banner says that I cannot answer it until",
"from joining and 100 of which is association bonus. Surely this bonus ought",
"have \"10 rep on this site\". I have 101 rep, 1 of which",
"joining and 100 of which is association bonus. Surely this bonus ought to",
"I have \"10 rep on this site\". I have 101 rep, 1 of",
"bonus ought to count? The entire point of it is that it was",
"is association bonus. Surely this bonus ought to count? The entire point of",
"I cannot answer it until I have \"10 rep on this site\". I"
] |
[
"be perfectly genuine. Should we delete answers linking to commercial solutions, in order",
"hosting) and a free open-source solution. I can't help but think that the",
"OP <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>, which combines both a commercial solution (for hosting) and a free",
"that product, although it could be perfectly genuine. Should we delete answers linking",
"genuine. Should we delete answers linking to commercial solutions, in order to avoid",
"but think that the entire question was a disguised advertisement for that product,",
"solution (for hosting) and a free open-source solution. I can't help but think",
"can't help but think that the entire question was a disguised advertisement for",
"for that product, although it could be perfectly genuine. Should we delete answers",
"could be perfectly genuine. Should we delete answers linking to commercial solutions, in",
"disguised advertisement for that product, although it could be perfectly genuine. Should we",
"by the OP <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>, which combines both a commercial solution (for hosting) and",
"combines both a commercial solution (for hosting) and a free open-source solution. I",
"open-source solution. I can't help but think that the entire question was a",
"was a disguised advertisement for that product, although it could be perfectly genuine.",
"think that the entire question was a disguised advertisement for that product, although",
"The question [Free, open-source substitutes for Mendeley?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5352/free-open-source-substitutes-for-mendeley/8476#8476) attracted several answers, included one by",
"solution. I can't help but think that the entire question was a disguised",
"perfectly genuine. Should we delete answers linking to commercial solutions, in order to",
"a commercial solution (for hosting) and a free open-source solution. I can't help",
"one by the OP <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>, which combines both a commercial solution (for hosting)",
"product, although it could be perfectly genuine. Should we delete answers linking to",
"question was a disguised advertisement for that product, although it could be perfectly",
"for Mendeley?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5352/free-open-source-substitutes-for-mendeley/8476#8476) attracted several answers, included one by the OP <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>, which combines",
"both a commercial solution (for hosting) and a free open-source solution. I can't",
"advertisement for that product, although it could be perfectly genuine. Should we delete",
"[Free, open-source substitutes for Mendeley?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5352/free-open-source-substitutes-for-mendeley/8476#8476) attracted several answers, included one by the OP",
"Mendeley?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5352/free-open-source-substitutes-for-mendeley/8476#8476) attracted several answers, included one by the OP <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>, which combines both",
"open-source substitutes for Mendeley?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5352/free-open-source-substitutes-for-mendeley/8476#8476) attracted several answers, included one by the OP <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>,",
"free open-source solution. I can't help but think that the entire question was",
"Should we delete answers linking to commercial solutions, in order to avoid disguised",
"a disguised advertisement for that product, although it could be perfectly genuine. Should",
"it could be perfectly genuine. Should we delete answers linking to commercial solutions,",
"(for hosting) and a free open-source solution. I can't help but think that",
"question [Free, open-source substitutes for Mendeley?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5352/free-open-source-substitutes-for-mendeley/8476#8476) attracted several answers, included one by the",
"<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>, which combines both a commercial solution (for hosting) and a free open-source",
"that the entire question was a disguised advertisement for that product, although it",
"included one by the OP <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>, which combines both a commercial solution (for",
"the OP <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>, which combines both a commercial solution (for hosting) and a",
"several answers, included one by the OP <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>, which combines both a commercial",
"the entire question was a disguised advertisement for that product, although it could",
"substitutes for Mendeley?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5352/free-open-source-substitutes-for-mendeley/8476#8476) attracted several answers, included one by the OP <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>, which",
"I can't help but think that the entire question was a disguised advertisement",
"which combines both a commercial solution (for hosting) and a free open-source solution.",
"entire question was a disguised advertisement for that product, although it could be",
"commercial solution (for hosting) and a free open-source solution. I can't help but",
"attracted several answers, included one by the OP <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>, which combines both a",
"and a free open-source solution. I can't help but think that the entire",
"although it could be perfectly genuine. Should we delete answers linking to commercial",
"a free open-source solution. I can't help but think that the entire question",
"we delete answers linking to commercial solutions, in order to avoid disguised advertisement?",
"help but think that the entire question was a disguised advertisement for that",
"answers, included one by the OP <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/8476/102>, which combines both a commercial solution"
] |
[
"instantly, the anonymity factor is immediately gone. I assume this warning can be",
"when Google caches this question almost instantly, the anonymity factor is immediately gone.",
"site, but when Google caches this question almost instantly, the anonymity factor is",
"on the site, but when Google caches this question almost instantly, the anonymity",
"way of reminding the user before the question is posted? I know it's",
"posted? I know it's relatively easy to trace a user history back for",
"presented, don't have this issue. We can use our real names there, and",
"there, and so on. In this one, where there are both real and",
"potential issues with open naming. Other Stack Exchanges like Stack Overflow, where legal",
"relatively easy to trace a user history back for most people on the",
"be provided when a tag is provided, such as ethics, legal issues, or",
"Is there a practical way of reminding the user before the question is",
"In this one, where there are both real and hypothetical situations with major",
"one of the potential issues with open naming. Other Stack Exchanges like Stack",
"being presented, don't have this issue. We can use our real names there,",
"in their questions. Is there a practical way of reminding the user before",
"have this issue. We can use our real names there, and so on.",
"not being presented, don't have this issue. We can use our real names",
"question almost instantly, the anonymity factor is immediately gone. I assume this warning",
"I assume this warning can be provided when a tag is provided, such",
"Exchanges like Stack Overflow, where legal issues and real ethical issues are not",
"concept, but [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31265/my-professor-is-rigging-data-and-plagiarizing-what-can-i-do) indicates one of the potential issues with open naming.",
"caches this question almost instantly, the anonymity factor is immediately gone. I assume",
"a few questions in the past similar in concept, but [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31265/my-professor-is-rigging-data-and-plagiarizing-what-can-i-do) indicates",
"indicates one of the potential issues with open naming. Other Stack Exchanges like",
"provided when a tag is provided, such as ethics, legal issues, or any",
"past similar in concept, but [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31265/my-professor-is-rigging-data-and-plagiarizing-what-can-i-do) indicates one of the potential issues",
"or any sort of misconduct. I know StackOverflow has such a feature for",
"easy to trace a user history back for most people on the site,",
"misconduct. I know StackOverflow has such a feature for tag synonyms.  indicates one of the potential",
"don't have this issue. We can use our real names there, and so",
"everything they shouldn't be potentially posting in their questions. Is there a practical",
"where there are both real and hypothetical situations with major implications, people have",
"names there, and so on. In this one, where there are both real",
"history back for most people on the site, but when Google caches this",
"factor is immediately gone. I assume this warning can be provided when a",
"Stack Overflow, where legal issues and real ethical issues are not being presented,",
"in the past similar in concept, but [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31265/my-professor-is-rigging-data-and-plagiarizing-what-can-i-do) indicates one of the",
"like Stack Overflow, where legal issues and real ethical issues are not being",
"back for most people on the site, but when Google caches this question",
"We can use our real names there, and so on. In this one,",
"before the question is posted? I know it's relatively easy to trace a",
"and real ethical issues are not being presented, don't have this issue. We",
"issues and real ethical issues are not being presented, don't have this issue.",
"Other Stack Exchanges like Stack Overflow, where legal issues and real ethical issues",
"are not being presented, don't have this issue. We can use our real",
"such as ethics, legal issues, or any sort of misconduct. I know StackOverflow",
"this question almost instantly, the anonymity factor is immediately gone. I assume this",
"there a practical way of reminding the user before the question is posted?",
"as ethics, legal issues, or any sort of misconduct. I know StackOverflow has",
"had a few questions in the past similar in concept, but [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31265/my-professor-is-rigging-data-and-plagiarizing-what-can-i-do)",
"they shouldn't be potentially posting in their questions. Is there a practical way",
"potentially posting in their questions. Is there a practical way of reminding the",
"real names there, and so on. In this one, where there are both",
"and so on. In this one, where there are both real and hypothetical",
"legal issues and real ethical issues are not being presented, don't have this",
"the user before the question is posted? I know it's relatively easy to",
"there are both real and hypothetical situations with major implications, people have been",
"user before the question is posted? I know it's relatively easy to trace",
"shouldn't be potentially posting in their questions. Is there a practical way of",
"names, their websites, their real pictures, and everything they shouldn't be potentially posting",
"and everything they shouldn't be potentially posting in their questions. Is there a",
"assume this warning can be provided when a tag is provided, such as",
"websites, their real pictures, and everything they shouldn't be potentially posting in their",
"using their real names, their websites, their real pictures, and everything they shouldn't",
"a tag is provided, such as ethics, legal issues, or any sort of",
"in concept, but [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31265/my-professor-is-rigging-data-and-plagiarizing-what-can-i-do) indicates one of the potential issues with open",
"few questions in the past similar in concept, but [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31265/my-professor-is-rigging-data-and-plagiarizing-what-can-i-do) indicates one",
"situations with major implications, people have been using their real names, their websites,",
"real ethical issues are not being presented, don't have this issue. We can",
"know we've had a few questions in the past similar in concept, but",
"Stack Exchanges like Stack Overflow, where legal issues and real ethical issues are",
"anonymity factor is immediately gone. I assume this warning can be provided when",
"we've had a few questions in the past similar in concept, but [this",
"when a tag is provided, such as ethics, legal issues, or any sort",
"questions. Is there a practical way of reminding the user before the question",
"I know StackOverflow has such a feature for tag synonyms. ",
"on. In this one, where there are both real and hypothetical situations with",
"most people on the site, but when Google caches this question almost instantly,",
"it's relatively easy to trace a user history back for most people on",
"trace a user history back for most people on the site, but when",
"this warning can be provided when a tag is provided, such as ethics,",
"know it's relatively easy to trace a user history back for most people",
"so on. In this one, where there are both real and hypothetical situations",
"warning can be provided when a tag is provided, such as ethics, legal",
"almost instantly, the anonymity factor is immediately gone. I assume this warning can",
"ethical issues are not being presented, don't have this issue. We can use",
"their questions. Is there a practical way of reminding the user before the",
"the anonymity factor is immediately gone. I assume this warning can be provided",
"major implications, people have been using their real names, their websites, their real",
"to trace a user history back for most people on the site, but",
"real pictures, and everything they shouldn't be potentially posting in their questions. Is",
"their real pictures, and everything they shouldn't be potentially posting in their questions.",
"real names, their websites, their real pictures, and everything they shouldn't be potentially",
"this issue. We can use our real names there, and so on. In",
"questions in the past similar in concept, but [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31265/my-professor-is-rigging-data-and-plagiarizing-what-can-i-do) indicates one of",
"use our real names there, and so on. In this one, where there",
"but [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31265/my-professor-is-rigging-data-and-plagiarizing-what-can-i-do) indicates one of the potential issues with open naming. Other",
"issues are not being presented, don't have this issue. We can use our",
"gone. I assume this warning can be provided when a tag is provided,",
"open naming. Other Stack Exchanges like Stack Overflow, where legal issues and real",
"of the potential issues with open naming. Other Stack Exchanges like Stack Overflow,",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31265/my-professor-is-rigging-data-and-plagiarizing-what-can-i-do) indicates one of the potential issues with open naming. Other Stack Exchanges",
"people have been using their real names, their websites, their real pictures, and",
"similar in concept, but [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31265/my-professor-is-rigging-data-and-plagiarizing-what-can-i-do) indicates one of the potential issues with",
"question is posted? I know it's relatively easy to trace a user history",
"practical way of reminding the user before the question is posted? I know",
"issues with open naming. Other Stack Exchanges like Stack Overflow, where legal issues",
"where legal issues and real ethical issues are not being presented, don't have",
"a user history back for most people on the site, but when Google",
"issues, or any sort of misconduct. I know StackOverflow has such a feature",
"the potential issues with open naming. Other Stack Exchanges like Stack Overflow, where",
"this one, where there are both real and hypothetical situations with major implications,",
"one, where there are both real and hypothetical situations with major implications, people",
"been using their real names, their websites, their real pictures, and everything they",
"provided, such as ethics, legal issues, or any sort of misconduct. I know",
"with major implications, people have been using their real names, their websites, their",
"our real names there, and so on. In this one, where there are",
"the question is posted? I know it's relatively easy to trace a user",
"any sort of misconduct. I know StackOverflow has such a feature for tag",
"is provided, such as ethics, legal issues, or any sort of misconduct. I",
"be potentially posting in their questions. Is there a practical way of reminding",
"real and hypothetical situations with major implications, people have been using their real",
"posting in their questions. Is there a practical way of reminding the user",
"and hypothetical situations with major implications, people have been using their real names,",
"Google caches this question almost instantly, the anonymity factor is immediately gone. I",
"naming. Other Stack Exchanges like Stack Overflow, where legal issues and real ethical",
"people on the site, but when Google caches this question almost instantly, the",
"their websites, their real pictures, and everything they shouldn't be potentially posting in",
"I know it's relatively easy to trace a user history back for most",
"tag is provided, such as ethics, legal issues, or any sort of misconduct.",
"implications, people have been using their real names, their websites, their real pictures,",
"immediately gone. I assume this warning can be provided when a tag is",
"are both real and hypothetical situations with major implications, people have been using",
"[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31265/my-professor-is-rigging-data-and-plagiarizing-what-can-i-do) indicates one of the potential issues with open naming. Other Stack",
"issue. We can use our real names there, and so on. In this",
"for most people on the site, but when Google caches this question almost",
"is posted? I know it's relatively easy to trace a user history back",
"have been using their real names, their websites, their real pictures, and everything",
"a practical way of reminding the user before the question is posted? I",
"ethics, legal issues, or any sort of misconduct. I know StackOverflow has such",
"the site, but when Google caches this question almost instantly, the anonymity factor",
"Overflow, where legal issues and real ethical issues are not being presented, don't",
"but when Google caches this question almost instantly, the anonymity factor is immediately",
"their real names, their websites, their real pictures, and everything they shouldn't be",
"legal issues, or any sort of misconduct. I know StackOverflow has such a",
"sort of misconduct. I know StackOverflow has such a feature for tag synonyms.",
"reminding the user before the question is posted? I know it's relatively easy",
"of reminding the user before the question is posted? I know it's relatively",
"with open naming. Other Stack Exchanges like Stack Overflow, where legal issues and",
"is immediately gone. I assume this warning can be provided when a tag",
"I know we've had a few questions in the past similar in concept,",
"can use our real names there, and so on. In this one, where",
"of misconduct. I know StackOverflow has such a feature for tag synonyms. ![StackOverflow",
"user history back for most people on the site, but when Google caches",
"hypothetical situations with major implications, people have been using their real names, their",
"both real and hypothetical situations with major implications, people have been using their"
] |
[
"are not particularly involved in AC.SE are often confused that while questions pertaining",
"at AC.SE. I was hoping that we could develop a nice summary statement",
"summary statement that explains why our [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) says: > > please do",
"[Welcome to Academia.SE!](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se), but at this time, I am not sure what to",
"SE users that are not particularly involved in AC.SE are often confused that",
"> > Potentially, this could be added to [Welcome to Academia.SE!](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se), but at",
"not particularly involved in AC.SE are often confused that while questions pertaining to",
"develop a nice summary statement that explains why our [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) says: >",
"not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > > > Potentially, this could",
"could develop a nice summary statement that explains why our [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) says:",
"to academia, we generally consider them off topic at AC.SE. I was hoping",
"we generally consider them off topic at AC.SE. I was hoping that we",
"added to [Welcome to Academia.SE!](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se), but at this time, I am not sure",
"apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > > > Potentially, this could be",
"hoping that we could develop a nice summary statement that explains why our",
"and degrees are relevant to academia, we generally consider them off topic at",
"pertaining to undergraduate students, classes and degrees are relevant to academia, we generally",
"to undergraduate students, classes and degrees are relevant to academia, we generally consider",
"degrees are relevant to academia, we generally consider them off topic at AC.SE.",
"undergraduate students, classes and degrees are relevant to academia, we generally consider them",
"center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) says: > > please do not ask questions about undergraduate-specific issues that",
"graduate or post-graduate academicians > > > Potentially, this could be added to",
"generally consider them off topic at AC.SE. I was hoping that we could",
"nice summary statement that explains why our [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) says: > > please",
"that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > > > Potentially,",
"It seems SE users that are not particularly involved in AC.SE are often",
"ask questions about undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate",
"to Academia.SE!](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se), but at this time, I am not sure what to say.",
"> > > Potentially, this could be added to [Welcome to Academia.SE!](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se), but",
"questions about undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians",
"about undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians >",
"> please do not ask questions about undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply",
"are often confused that while questions pertaining to undergraduate students, classes and degrees",
"says: > > please do not ask questions about undergraduate-specific issues that could",
"please do not ask questions about undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to",
"could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > > > Potentially, this",
"involved in AC.SE are often confused that while questions pertaining to undergraduate students,",
"could be added to [Welcome to Academia.SE!](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se), but at this time, I am",
"why our [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) says: > > please do not ask questions about",
"Potentially, this could be added to [Welcome to Academia.SE!](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se), but at this time,",
"classes and degrees are relevant to academia, we generally consider them off topic",
"off topic at AC.SE. I was hoping that we could develop a nice",
"academia, we generally consider them off topic at AC.SE. I was hoping that",
"undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > >",
"questions pertaining to undergraduate students, classes and degrees are relevant to academia, we",
"> > please do not ask questions about undergraduate-specific issues that could not",
"post-graduate academicians > > > Potentially, this could be added to [Welcome to",
"[help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) says: > > please do not ask questions about undergraduate-specific issues",
"I was hoping that we could develop a nice summary statement that explains",
"confused that while questions pertaining to undergraduate students, classes and degrees are relevant",
"consider them off topic at AC.SE. I was hoping that we could develop",
"AC.SE are often confused that while questions pertaining to undergraduate students, classes and",
"explains why our [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) says: > > please do not ask questions",
"that while questions pertaining to undergraduate students, classes and degrees are relevant to",
"while questions pertaining to undergraduate students, classes and degrees are relevant to academia,",
"that we could develop a nice summary statement that explains why our [help",
"issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > > >",
"a nice summary statement that explains why our [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) says: > >",
"them off topic at AC.SE. I was hoping that we could develop a",
"or post-graduate academicians > > > Potentially, this could be added to [Welcome",
"AC.SE. I was hoping that we could develop a nice summary statement that",
"are relevant to academia, we generally consider them off topic at AC.SE. I",
"users that are not particularly involved in AC.SE are often confused that while",
"not ask questions about undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or",
"academicians > > > Potentially, this could be added to [Welcome to Academia.SE!](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se),",
"our [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) says: > > please do not ask questions about undergraduate-specific",
"was hoping that we could develop a nice summary statement that explains why",
"to [Welcome to Academia.SE!](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se), but at this time, I am not sure what",
"particularly involved in AC.SE are often confused that while questions pertaining to undergraduate",
"statement that explains why our [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) says: > > please do not",
"to graduate or post-graduate academicians > > > Potentially, this could be added",
"we could develop a nice summary statement that explains why our [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)",
"this could be added to [Welcome to Academia.SE!](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se), but at this time, I",
"often confused that while questions pertaining to undergraduate students, classes and degrees are",
"be added to [Welcome to Academia.SE!](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se), but at this time, I am not",
"> Potentially, this could be added to [Welcome to Academia.SE!](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se), but at this",
"students, classes and degrees are relevant to academia, we generally consider them off",
"in AC.SE are often confused that while questions pertaining to undergraduate students, classes",
"that explains why our [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) says: > > please do not ask",
"relevant to academia, we generally consider them off topic at AC.SE. I was",
"seems SE users that are not particularly involved in AC.SE are often confused",
"topic at AC.SE. I was hoping that we could develop a nice summary",
"that are not particularly involved in AC.SE are often confused that while questions",
"do not ask questions about undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate"
] |
[
"and visual recordings of the presentations, and > ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues.",
"question? --- The question got on hold so I deleted and created a",
"received 3 close votes for being too broad. It seems that close voters",
"I improve the question? --- The question got on hold so I deleted",
"the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question > indicates it focuses on the USA",
"> I'd also be fine with a list of countries where consent is",
"or to record audio / video of a conference > talk. > >",
"to record audio of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the",
"> > Title: In which countries is consent required by law to take",
"of the presentations, and > ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > >",
"by law to take a picture > or to record audio / video",
"broad. It seems that close voters complain that I am asking for all",
"only. > > > I'd also be fine with a list of countries",
"take a picture > or to record audio / video of a conference",
"presentations, and > ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > > I am",
"that close voters complain that I am asking for all countries instead of",
"but as the question > indicates it focuses on the USA only. >",
"record audio / video of a conference talk? > > > Body: Provided",
"<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31701/452> received 3 close votes for being too broad. It seems that close",
"video of a conference talk? > > > Body: Provided that the conference",
"I am aware of the question > [Is consent required to record audio",
"or otherwise how can I improve the question? --- The question got on",
"required by law to take a picture > or to record audio /",
"I see that my question <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31701/452> received 3 close votes for being too",
"so I deleted and created a country-specific question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>). Below is the original",
"here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/jhwbA.png) > > Title: In which countries is consent required by law to",
"that the conference does not explicitly prohibit > unauthorized audio and visual recordings",
"> [Is consent required to record audio of a conference talk in the",
"Body: Provided that the conference does not explicitly prohibit > unauthorized audio and",
"country, or otherwise how can I improve the question? --- The question got",
"be fine with a list of countries where consent is not > required",
"or to record audio / video of a conference talk? > > >",
"picture or to record audio / video of a conference > talk. >",
"asking for all countries instead of just one. Should I ask one question",
"Below is the original question:  > > Title: In",
"countries is consent required by law to take a picture > or to",
"votes for being too broad. It seems that close voters complain that I",
"the conference does not explicitly prohibit > unauthorized audio and visual recordings of",
"a list of countries where consent is not > required to take a",
"just one. Should I ask one question per country, or otherwise how can",
"consent is not > required to take a picture or to record audio",
"a picture or to record audio / video of a conference > talk.",
"USA only. > > > I'd also be fine with a list of",
"(<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>). Below is the original question:  > > Title:",
"unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the presentations, and > ignoring ethical/political/any other",
"audio of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question >",
"where consent is not > required to take a picture or to record",
"to record audio / video of a conference talk? > > > Body:",
"countries where consent is not > required to take a picture or to",
"audio / video of a conference talk? > > > Body: Provided that",
"prohibit > unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the presentations, and > ignoring",
"of a conference talk? > > > Body: Provided that the conference does",
"conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question > indicates it focuses",
"complain that I am asking for all countries instead of just one. Should",
"> Body: Provided that the conference does not explicitly prohibit > unauthorized audio",
"3 close votes for being too broad. It seems that close voters complain",
"and created a country-specific question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>). Below is the original question: , but as the question > indicates",
"the USA only. > > > I'd also be fine with a list",
"is not > required to take a picture or to record audio /",
"deleted and created a country-specific question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>). Below is the original question: , but as the question > indicates it focuses on",
"> or to record audio / video of a conference talk? > >",
"to take a picture > or to record audio / video of a",
"ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > > I am aware of the question",
"list of countries where consent is not > required to take a picture",
"> > Body: Provided that the conference does not explicitly prohibit > unauthorized",
"a picture > or to record audio / video of a conference talk?",
"for all countries instead of just one. Should I ask one question per",
"can I improve the question? --- The question got on hold so I",
"of just one. Should I ask one question per country, or otherwise how",
"question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>). Below is the original question:  > >",
"> > > Body: Provided that the conference does not explicitly prohibit >",
"ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > > I am aware of the",
"question > [Is consent required to record audio of a conference talk in",
"indicates it focuses on the USA only. > > > I'd also be",
"description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/jhwbA.png) > > Title: In which countries is consent required by law",
"original question:  > > Title: In which countries is",
"fine with a list of countries where consent is not > required to",
"> > I am aware of the question > [Is consent required to",
"a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question > indicates it",
"the question > [Is consent required to record audio of a conference talk",
"the question > indicates it focuses on the USA only. > > >",
"take a picture or to record audio / video of a conference >",
"to record audio / video of a conference > talk. > > >",
"/ video of a conference talk? > > > Body: Provided that the",
"too broad. It seems that close voters complain that I am asking for",
"> Title: In which countries is consent required by law to take a",
"instead of just one. Should I ask one question per country, or otherwise",
"required to record audio of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as",
"picture > or to record audio / video of a conference talk? >",
"image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/jhwbA.png) > > Title: In which countries is consent required by",
"aware of the question > [Is consent required to record audio of a",
"In which countries is consent required by law to take a picture >",
"created a country-specific question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>). Below is the original question: , but as the question > indicates it focuses on the USA only.",
"> indicates it focuses on the USA only. > > > I'd also",
"> > I'd also be fine with a list of countries where consent",
"question per country, or otherwise how can I improve the question? --- The",
"one question per country, or otherwise how can I improve the question? ---",
"consent required to record audio of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but",
"country-specific question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>). Below is the original question:  >",
"the original question:  > > Title: In which countries",
"question:  > > Title: In which countries is consent",
"all countries instead of just one. Should I ask one question per country,",
"the presentations, and > ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > > I",
"to take a picture or to record audio / video of a conference",
"it focuses on the USA only. > > > I'd also be fine",
"non-legal issues. > > > I am aware of the question > [Is",
"a country-specific question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>). Below is the original question: ",
"> ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > > I am aware of",
"see that my question <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31701/452> received 3 close votes for being too broad.",
"for being too broad. It seems that close voters complain that I am",
"on hold so I deleted and created a country-specific question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>). Below is",
"I am asking for all countries instead of just one. Should I ask",
"audio and visual recordings of the presentations, and > ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal",
"got on hold so I deleted and created a country-specific question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>). Below",
"[Is consent required to record audio of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452),",
"on the USA only. > > > I'd also be fine with a",
"hold so I deleted and created a country-specific question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>). Below is the",
"question > indicates it focuses on the USA only. > > > I'd",
"one. Should I ask one question per country, or otherwise how can I",
"> > > I'd also be fine with a list of countries where",
"improve the question? --- The question got on hold so I deleted and",
"and > ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > > I am aware",
"which countries is consent required by law to take a picture > or",
"Should I ask one question per country, or otherwise how can I improve",
"explicitly prohibit > unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the presentations, and >",
"seems that close voters complain that I am asking for all countries instead",
"countries instead of just one. Should I ask one question per country, or",
"> I am aware of the question > [Is consent required to record",
"is the original question:  > > Title: In which",
"with a list of countries where consent is not > required to take",
"does not explicitly prohibit > unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the presentations,",
"> > > I am aware of the question > [Is consent required",
"focuses on the USA only. > > > I'd also be fine with",
"is consent required by law to take a picture > or to record",
"--- The question got on hold so I deleted and created a country-specific",
"that I am asking for all countries instead of just one. Should I",
"not explicitly prohibit > unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the presentations, and",
"being too broad. It seems that close voters complain that I am asking",
"that my question <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31701/452> received 3 close votes for being too broad. It",
"question got on hold so I deleted and created a country-specific question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>).",
"conference does not explicitly prohibit > unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the",
"the question? --- The question got on hold so I deleted and created",
"required to take a picture or to record audio / video of a",
"> required to take a picture or to record audio / video of",
"> unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the presentations, and > ignoring ethical/political/any",
"I ask one question per country, or otherwise how can I improve the",
"close voters complain that I am asking for all countries instead of just",
"record audio of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question",
"am asking for all countries instead of just one. Should I ask one",
"how can I improve the question? --- The question got on hold so",
"conference talk? > > > Body: Provided that the conference does not explicitly",
"of the question > [Is consent required to record audio of a conference",
"I'd also be fine with a list of countries where consent is not",
"It seems that close voters complain that I am asking for all countries",
"The question got on hold so I deleted and created a country-specific question",
"close votes for being too broad. It seems that close voters complain that",
"am aware of the question > [Is consent required to record audio of",
"in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question > indicates it focuses on the",
" > > Title: In which countries is consent required",
"my question <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31701/452> received 3 close votes for being too broad. It seems",
"of countries where consent is not > required to take a picture or",
"I deleted and created a country-specific question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>). Below is the original question:",
"a conference talk? > > > Body: Provided that the conference does not",
"other non-legal issues. > > > I am aware of the question >",
"Title: In which countries is consent required by law to take a picture",
"visual recordings of the presentations, and > ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. >",
"Provided that the conference does not explicitly prohibit > unauthorized audio and visual",
"otherwise how can I improve the question? --- The question got on hold",
"question <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31701/452> received 3 close votes for being too broad. It seems that",
"also be fine with a list of countries where consent is not >"
] |
[
"a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats",
"in a leaderboard that looks something like this:  Stack Exchange",
"anyone). In 2012 and 2013, we chose to participate. To decide whether we",
"without a trace. You can see FAQs from last year's promotion [here](http://winterbash2013.stackexchange.com/faq). ---",
"*any* hat at all). * Apart from the wearing of hats by avatars,",
"* Apart from the wearing of hats by avatars, the site is otherwise",
"can see FAQs from last year's promotion [here](http://winterbash2013.stackexchange.com/faq). --- This being said, we",
"amazing people who make the sites awesome, as the year draws to a",
"any Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for their",
"can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard that looks",
"see *any* hat at all). * Apart from the wearing of hats by",
"You can see FAQs from last year's promotion [here](http://winterbash2013.stackexchange.com/faq). --- This being said,",
"**Upvote one of the comments according to your preference.** If you want to",
"the comments according to your preference.** If you want to discuss further, leave",
"can opt out** (clicking an option in your profile means you won't see",
"have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (not hats for",
"from the wearing of hats by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there",
"After the event ends, the hats disappear without a trace. You can see",
"have to choice to opt out entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely",
"disappear without a trace. You can see FAQs from last year's promotion [here](http://winterbash2013.stackexchange.com/faq).",
"2012 and 2013, we chose to participate. To decide whether we will participate",
"Edition, **I've created a “poll” below this post**, with two comments. **Upvote one",
"your profile means you won't see *any* hat at all). * Apart from",
"Besh\"](http://stackexchange.com/promos/12/winter-bash). Cultep Besh is an annual event that can run on any Stack",
"a leaderboard that looks something like this:  Stack Exchange sees",
"that looks something like this:  Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh",
"user can opt out** (clicking an option in your profile means you won't",
"to participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous",
"trace. You can see FAQs from last year's promotion [here](http://winterbash2013.stackexchange.com/faq). --- This being",
"--- This being said, we (as a community) also have to choice to",
"according to your preference.** If you want to discuss further, leave an answer",
"opt out** (clicking an option in your profile means you won't see *any*",
"its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://stackexchange.com/promos/12/winter-bash). Cultep Besh is an annual event that",
"to celebrate the amazing people who make the sites awesome, as the year",
"tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving a hat, which",
"will continue its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://stackexchange.com/promos/12/winter-bash). Cultep Besh is an annual",
"hats disappear without a trace. You can see FAQs from last year's promotion",
"hats in a leaderboard that looks something like this:  Stack",
"further, leave an answer or comments to other answers. The poll will close",
"2014 Edition, **I've created a “poll” below this post**, with two comments. **Upvote",
"as a a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing people who",
"to a close. Three things to note: * **Any user can opt out**",
"Exchange (not hats for anyone). In 2012 and 2013, we chose to participate.",
"to your preference.** If you want to discuss further, leave an answer or",
"gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard that",
"unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of the site's design, for example) *",
"out** (clicking an option in your profile means you won't see *any* hat",
"or comments to other answers. The poll will close on November 28, 2014.",
"below this post**, with two comments. **Upvote one of the comments according to",
"and 2013, we chose to participate. To decide whether we will participate in",
"site is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of the site's design,",
"see FAQs from last year's promotion [here](http://winterbash2013.stackexchange.com/faq). --- This being said, we (as",
"Cultep Besh as a a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing",
"earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain",
"their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the",
"Besh 2014 Edition, **I've created a “poll” below this post**, with two comments.",
"example) * After the event ends, the hats disappear without a trace. You",
"2013, we chose to participate. To decide whether we will participate in the",
"[\"Cultep Besh\"](http://stackexchange.com/promos/12/winter-bash). Cultep Besh is an annual event that can run on any",
"event that can run on any Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate.",
"can run on any Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users earn",
"leaderboard that looks something like this:  Stack Exchange sees Cultep",
"things to note: * **Any user can opt out** (clicking an option in",
"celebrate the amazing people who make the sites awesome, as the year draws",
"run on any Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats”",
"in your profile means you won't see *any* hat at all). * Apart",
"last year's promotion [here](http://winterbash2013.stackexchange.com/faq). --- This being said, we (as a community) also",
"an annual event that can run on any Stack Exchange site that chooses",
"the hats disappear without a trace. You can see FAQs from last year's",
"out entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange",
"of the site's design, for example) * After the event ends, the hats",
"on any Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for",
"“poll” below this post**, with two comments. **Upvote one of the comments according",
"the amazing people who make the sites awesome, as the year draws to",
"year's promotion [here](http://winterbash2013.stackexchange.com/faq). --- This being said, we (as a community) also have",
"the sites awesome, as the year draws to a close. Three things to",
"wearing of hats by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there is no",
"the user receiving a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s",
"choice to opt out entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on",
"opt out entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack",
"* After the event ends, the hats disappear without a trace. You can",
"the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (not hats for anyone).",
"Academia Stack Exchange (not hats for anyone). In 2012 and 2013, we chose",
"want to discuss further, leave an answer or comments to other answers. The",
"answer or comments to other answers. The poll will close on November 28,",
"“hats” for their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions",
"hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats in",
"and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (not hats",
"like this:  Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a",
"Certain actions trigger the user receiving a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”.",
"with two comments. **Upvote one of the comments according to your preference.** If",
"comments according to your preference.** If you want to discuss further, leave an",
"something like this:  Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a",
"your preference.** If you want to discuss further, leave an answer or comments",
"“holiday” theme of the site's design, for example) * After the event ends,",
"looks something like this:  Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as",
"of hats by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday”",
"Stack Exchange (not hats for anyone). In 2012 and 2013, we chose to",
"a a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing people who make",
"preference.** If you want to discuss further, leave an answer or comments to",
"an answer or comments to other answers. The poll will close on November",
"an option in your profile means you won't see *any* hat at all).",
"promotion [here](http://winterbash2013.stackexchange.com/faq). --- This being said, we (as a community) also have to",
"make the sites awesome, as the year draws to a close. Three things",
"a “poll” below this post**, with two comments. **Upvote one of the comments",
"close. Three things to note: * **Any user can opt out** (clicking an",
"to participate. To decide whether we will participate in the Cultep Besh 2014",
"2014, Stack Exchange will continue its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://stackexchange.com/promos/12/winter-bash). Cultep Besh",
"their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard",
"year draws to a close. Three things to note: * **Any user can",
"* **Any user can opt out** (clicking an option in your profile means",
"the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://stackexchange.com/promos/12/winter-bash). Cultep Besh is an annual event that can run on",
"from last year's promotion [here](http://winterbash2013.stackexchange.com/faq). --- This being said, we (as a community)",
"earning hats in a leaderboard that looks something like this: ",
"people who make the sites awesome, as the year draws to a close.",
"in the Cultep Besh 2014 Edition, **I've created a “poll” below this post**,",
"community) also have to choice to opt out entirely and have the Cultep",
"Stack Exchange will continue its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://stackexchange.com/promos/12/winter-bash). Cultep Besh is",
"theme of the site's design, for example) * After the event ends, the",
"participate in the Cultep Besh 2014 Edition, **I've created a “poll” below this",
"one of the comments according to your preference.** If you want to discuss",
"continue its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://stackexchange.com/promos/12/winter-bash). Cultep Besh is an annual event",
"on Academia Stack Exchange (not hats for anyone). In 2012 and 2013, we",
"to note: * **Any user can opt out** (clicking an option in your",
"discuss further, leave an answer or comments to other answers. The poll will",
"decide whether we will participate in the Cultep Besh 2014 Edition, **I've created",
"trigger the user receiving a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We track",
"completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (not hats for anyone). In 2012 and",
"for anyone). In 2012 and 2013, we chose to participate. To decide whether",
"this post**, with two comments. **Upvote one of the comments according to your",
"we (as a community) also have to choice to opt out entirely and",
"actions trigger the user receiving a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We",
"If you want to discuss further, leave an answer or comments to other",
"tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://stackexchange.com/promos/12/winter-bash). Cultep Besh is an annual event that can",
"to choice to opt out entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled",
"Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate",
"participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to",
"badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving a hat, which their gravatar can",
"that can run on any Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users",
"ends, the hats disappear without a trace. You can see FAQs from last",
"also have to choice to opt out entirely and have the Cultep Besh",
"(not hats for anyone). In 2012 and 2013, we chose to participate. To",
"created a “poll” below this post**, with two comments. **Upvote one of the",
"a trace. You can see FAQs from last year's promotion [here](http://winterbash2013.stackexchange.com/faq). --- This",
"completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving a",
"way to celebrate the amazing people who make the sites awesome, as the",
"(there is no “holiday” theme of the site's design, for example) * After",
"(analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving a hat, which their",
"whether we will participate in the Cultep Besh 2014 Edition, **I've created a",
"comments. **Upvote one of the comments according to your preference.** If you want",
"a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing people who make the",
"profile means you won't see *any* hat at all). * Apart from the",
"who make the sites awesome, as the year draws to a close. Three",
"a community) also have to choice to opt out entirely and have the",
"by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving",
"In 2012 and 2013, we chose to participate. To decide whether we will",
"avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of the",
"for example) * After the event ends, the hats disappear without a trace.",
"hats for anyone). In 2012 and 2013, we chose to participate. To decide",
"we chose to participate. To decide whether we will participate in the Cultep",
"Besh is an annual event that can run on any Stack Exchange site",
"**Any user can opt out** (clicking an option in your profile means you",
"of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://stackexchange.com/promos/12/winter-bash). Cultep Besh is an annual event that can run",
"which their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats in a",
"of the comments according to your preference.** If you want to discuss further,",
"track everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard that looks something like this:",
"Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (not hats for anyone). In",
"To decide whether we will participate in the Cultep Besh 2014 Edition, **I've",
"you won't see *any* hat at all). * Apart from the wearing of",
"being said, we (as a community) also have to choice to opt out",
"awesome, as the year draws to a close. Three things to note: *",
"to badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving a hat, which their gravatar",
"Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a fun and lighthearted way to",
"to opt out entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia",
"that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing certain",
"sees Cultep Besh as a a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the",
"chose to participate. To decide whether we will participate in the Cultep Besh",
"In 2014, Stack Exchange will continue its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://stackexchange.com/promos/12/winter-bash). Cultep",
"entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (not",
"two comments. **Upvote one of the comments according to your preference.** If you",
"note: * **Any user can opt out** (clicking an option in your profile",
"is no “holiday” theme of the site's design, for example) * After the",
"won't see *any* hat at all). * Apart from the wearing of hats",
"by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of",
"we will participate in the Cultep Besh 2014 Edition, **I've created a “poll”",
"**I've created a “poll” below this post**, with two comments. **Upvote one of",
"FAQs from last year's promotion [here](http://winterbash2013.stackexchange.com/faq). --- This being said, we (as a",
"annual event that can run on any Stack Exchange site that chooses to",
"hat at all). * Apart from the wearing of hats by avatars, the",
"said, we (as a community) also have to choice to opt out entirely",
"otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of the site's design, for example)",
"site that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing",
"Three things to note: * **Any user can opt out** (clicking an option",
"the site's design, for example) * After the event ends, the hats disappear",
"the Cultep Besh 2014 Edition, **I've created a “poll” below this post**, with",
"“wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard that looks something",
"progress earning hats in a leaderboard that looks something like this: . --- This being said, we (as a community) also have to choice",
"Exchange will continue its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://stackexchange.com/promos/12/winter-bash). Cultep Besh is an",
"(clicking an option in your profile means you won't see *any* hat at",
"gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the user",
"the site is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of the site's",
"(as a community) also have to choice to opt out entirely and have",
"Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges).",
"for their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger",
"option in your profile means you won't see *any* hat at all). *",
"participate. To decide whether we will participate in the Cultep Besh 2014 Edition,",
"will participate in the Cultep Besh 2014 Edition, **I've created a “poll” below",
"Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by",
"design, for example) * After the event ends, the hats disappear without a",
"you want to discuss further, leave an answer or comments to other answers.",
"event ends, the hats disappear without a trace. You can see FAQs from",
"user receiving a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress",
"everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard that looks something like this:  Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a fun and lighthearted way",
"a close. Three things to note: * **Any user can opt out** (clicking",
"the event ends, the hats disappear without a trace. You can see FAQs",
"to discuss further, leave an answer or comments to other answers. The poll",
"receiving a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning",
"Besh as a a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing people",
"Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a fun and lighthearted",
"no “holiday” theme of the site's design, for example) * After the event",
"Cultep Besh 2014 Edition, **I've created a “poll” below this post**, with two",
"leave an answer or comments to other answers. The poll will close on",
"hats by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme",
"We track everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard that looks something like",
" Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a fun and",
"Apart from the wearing of hats by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected",
"chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing certain tasks",
"all). * Apart from the wearing of hats by avatars, the site is",
"site's design, for example) * After the event ends, the hats disappear without",
"disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (not hats for anyone). In 2012 and 2013,",
"certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving a hat,",
"Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (not hats for anyone). In 2012",
"this:  Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a fun",
"This being said, we (as a community) also have to choice to opt",
"post**, with two comments. **Upvote one of the comments according to your preference.**",
"as the year draws to a close. Three things to note: * **Any"
] |
[
"site design. It is very pretty. I don't like the link text color.",
"bit. A lot actually. Related: [Not enough distinction between visited links and unvisited",
"this shade I recommend increasing the contrast a bit. A lot actually. Related:",
"link text without having to see the image that underscores it below.  > >  > > > If",
"very pretty. I don't like the link text color. It does not stand",
"very well. Perhaps it is my computer so here's a snapshot Tell me",
"see the link text without having to see the image that underscores it",
"shade I recommend increasing the contrast a bit. A lot actually. Related: [Not",
"don't like the link text color. It does not stand out very well.",
"the image that underscores it below.  > >  > >  > > > If everyone sees roughly this shade I recommend",
"link text color. It does not stand out very well. Perhaps it is",
"it below.  > >  >",
"If everyone sees roughly this shade I recommend increasing the contrast a bit.",
"computer so here's a snapshot Tell me if you can see the link",
"sees roughly this shade I recommend increasing the contrast a bit. A lot",
"see the image that underscores it below.  > >",
"to see the image that underscores it below.  >",
"Perhaps it is my computer so here's a snapshot Tell me if you",
" > > > If everyone sees roughly this shade",
"Academia's site design. It is very pretty. I don't like the link text",
"lot actually. Related: [Not enough distinction between visited links and unvisited in the",
"like the link text color. It does not stand out very well. Perhaps",
"underscores it below.  > > ",
"here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xsUBf.png) > >  > > > If everyone sees",
"having to see the image that underscores it below. ",
"recommend increasing the contrast a bit. A lot actually. Related: [Not enough distinction",
"image that underscores it below.  > >  > >  > >",
"me if you can see the link text without having to see the",
"design. It is very pretty. I don't like the link text color. It",
"text color. It does not stand out very well. Perhaps it is my",
"color. It does not stand out very well. Perhaps it is my computer",
"well. Perhaps it is my computer so here's a snapshot Tell me if",
"> > > If everyone sees roughly this shade I recommend increasing the",
"> >  > > > If everyone sees roughly",
"I recommend increasing the contrast a bit. A lot actually. Related: [Not enough",
" > >  > > >",
"Related: [Not enough distinction between visited links and unvisited in the questions list](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1070/not-enough-distinction-between-visited-links-and-unvisited-in-the-questions-list)",
"pretty. I don't like the link text color. It does not stand out",
"It is very pretty. I don't like the link text color. It does",
"actually. Related: [Not enough distinction between visited links and unvisited in the questions",
"a snapshot Tell me if you can see the link text without having",
"description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xsUBf.png) > >  > > > If everyone",
"here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/zf4Ze.png) > > > If everyone sees roughly this shade I recommend increasing",
"snapshot Tell me if you can see the link text without having to",
"I like Academia's site design. It is very pretty. I don't like the",
"Tell me if you can see the link text without having to see",
"image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/zf4Ze.png) > > > If everyone sees roughly this shade I",
"if you can see the link text without having to see the image",
"the contrast a bit. A lot actually. Related: [Not enough distinction between visited",
"increasing the contrast a bit. A lot actually. Related: [Not enough distinction between",
"> > If everyone sees roughly this shade I recommend increasing the contrast",
"you can see the link text without having to see the image that",
"I don't like the link text color. It does not stand out very",
"A lot actually. Related: [Not enough distinction between visited links and unvisited in",
"the link text color. It does not stand out very well. Perhaps it",
"stand out very well. Perhaps it is my computer so here's a snapshot",
"out very well. Perhaps it is my computer so here's a snapshot Tell",
">  > > > If everyone sees roughly this",
"> If everyone sees roughly this shade I recommend increasing the contrast a",
"without having to see the image that underscores it below. ![enter image description",
"everyone sees roughly this shade I recommend increasing the contrast a bit. A",
"a bit. A lot actually. Related: [Not enough distinction between visited links and",
"roughly this shade I recommend increasing the contrast a bit. A lot actually."
] |
[
"a moderator. I have made my views on this clear in this question.",
"pertain to them, they participate in the most troubling form of censorship. >",
"actions on this site was deleted by a moderator. I have made my",
"the relevant comment thread (from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32394/how-can-i-tell-whether-a-mathematics-journal-seems-reputable)). The pink comments are the ones",
"had just said the same). Thus my comment about how moderator intervention literally",
"obsolete and deleted, or deleted proactively by a moderator who happens to see",
"in what circumstances moderator closure was appropriate. It included the information that I",
"then reopened after they have been edited and improved (either by the original",
"relevant comments which pertain to them, they participate in the most troubling form",
"recent and relevant comments. Therefore, they are typically flagged as obsolete and deleted,",
"about how moderator intervention literally wasted my time and nullified my actions on",
"just added to. So: **Should moderators delete comments that are about moderation, once",
"and relevant comments. Therefore, they are typically flagged as obsolete and deleted, or",
"question they're posted on?** For the sake of transparency, here is the relevant",
"Retu Zlerc has suggested in an edit to [another post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/805/is-deleting-comments-a-form-of-censorship) that this may",
"separately from the post it was just added to. So: **Should moderators delete",
"nullified my actions on this site was deleted by a moderator. I have",
"unilaterally closed by a moderator. My comment expressed -- wholly civilly -- an",
"by other users). Usually this involves an extended discussion in comments about whether",
"original poster or by other users). Usually this involves an extended discussion in",
"relevant comment thread (from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32394/how-can-i-tell-whether-a-mathematics-journal-seems-reputable)). The pink comments are the ones that",
"had been typing an answer while it was unilaterally closed (another user had",
"as obsolete and deleted, or deleted proactively by a moderator who happens to",
"my comment about how moderator intervention literally wasted my time and nullified my",
"the question. They don't directly relate to the subject of the question, and",
"[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32394/how-can-i-tell-whether-a-mathematics-journal-seems-reputable)). The pink comments are the ones that were deleted by me",
"reopened, the comments are no longer pertinent for purposes of improving the question.",
"be closed, reasons it should be reopened, how to improve it, etc. Once",
"is the relevant comment thread (from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32394/how-can-i-tell-whether-a-mathematics-journal-seems-reputable)). The pink comments are the",
"warning or acknowledgment. This comment was pertaining to a question that was unilaterally",
"of the question, and they make it more difficult for readers, who have",
"circumstances moderator closure was appropriate. It included the information that I had been",
"Questions on Academia.SE are often closed, and then reopened after they have been",
"and nullified my actions on this site was deleted by a moderator. I",
"or acknowledgment. This comment was pertaining to a question that was unilaterally closed",
"comment thread before getting to more recent and relevant comments. Therefore, they are",
"who have to review a long, obsolete comment thread before getting to more",
"pink comments are the ones that were deleted by me after I reopened",
"review a long, obsolete comment thread before getting to more recent and relevant",
"censorship. > > > I think this is a sufficiently important question to",
"Thus my comment about how moderator intervention literally wasted my time and nullified",
"of transparency, here is the relevant comment thread (from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32394/how-can-i-tell-whether-a-mathematics-journal-seems-reputable)). The pink",
"The pink comments are the ones that were deleted by me after I",
"and then reopened after they have been edited and improved (either by the",
"are about moderation, once they become obsolete with respect to the question they're",
"my time and nullified my actions on this site was deleted by a",
"said the same). Thus my comment about how moderator intervention literally wasted my",
"comment thread (from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32394/how-can-i-tell-whether-a-mathematics-journal-seems-reputable)). The pink comments are the ones that were",
"This comment was pertaining to a question that was unilaterally closed by a",
"to the question they're posted on?** For the sake of transparency, here is",
"no longer pertinent for purposes of improving the question. They don't directly relate",
"However, Retu Zlerc has suggested in an edit to [another post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/805/is-deleting-comments-a-form-of-censorship) that this",
"make it more difficult for readers, who have to review a long, obsolete",
"question to be asked separately from the post it was just added to.",
"and improved (either by the original poster or by other users). Usually this",
"same). Thus my comment about how moderator intervention literally wasted my time and",
"> > A comment of mine was recently deleted without warning or acknowledgment.",
"reasons it should be reopened, how to improve it, etc. Once the question",
"that I had been typing an answer while it was unilaterally closed (another",
"comments are the ones that were deleted by me after I reopened the",
"question, and they make it more difficult for readers, who have to review",
"ones that were deleted by me after I reopened the question:  that",
"that this may not be desirable behavior: > > A comment of mine",
"users). Usually this involves an extended discussion in comments about whether or not",
"about whether or not the question should be closed, reasons it should be",
"in the most troubling form of censorship. > > > I think this",
"a moderator. My comment expressed -- wholly civilly -- an opinion about in",
"posted on?** For the sake of transparency, here is the relevant comment thread",
"is a sufficiently important question to be asked separately from the post it",
"It included the information that I had been typing an answer while it",
"improved (either by the original poster or by other users). Usually this involves",
"about moderation, once they become obsolete with respect to the question they're posted",
"Therefore, they are typically flagged as obsolete and deleted, or deleted proactively by",
"was appropriate. It included the information that I had been typing an answer",
"the subject of the question, and they make it more difficult for readers,",
"moderation, once they become obsolete with respect to the question they're posted on?**",
"an edit to [another post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/805/is-deleting-comments-a-form-of-censorship) that this may not be desirable behavior: >",
"see them. However, Retu Zlerc has suggested in an edit to [another post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/805/is-deleting-comments-a-form-of-censorship)",
"Academia.SE are often closed, and then reopened after they have been edited and",
"reopened, how to improve it, etc. Once the question has been fixed and",
"closed by a moderator. My comment expressed -- wholly civilly -- an opinion",
"a moderator who happens to see them. However, Retu Zlerc has suggested in",
"getting to more recent and relevant comments. Therefore, they are typically flagged as",
"my actions on this site was deleted by a moderator. I have made",
"improving the question. They don't directly relate to the subject of the question,",
"was unilaterally closed by a moderator. My comment expressed -- wholly civilly --",
"the same). Thus my comment about how moderator intervention literally wasted my time",
"obsolete with respect to the question they're posted on?** For the sake of",
"are no longer pertinent for purposes of improving the question. They don't directly",
"by me after I reopened the question:  ). The pink comments",
"which pertain to them, they participate in the most troubling form of censorship.",
"(either by the original poster or by other users). Usually this involves an",
"in this question. When moderators delete relevant comments which pertain to them, they",
"on Academia.SE are often closed, and then reopened after they have been edited",
"in an edit to [another post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/805/is-deleting-comments-a-form-of-censorship) that this may not be desirable behavior:",
"intervention literally wasted my time and nullified my actions on this site was",
"just said the same). Thus my comment about how moderator intervention literally wasted",
"closure was appropriate. It included the information that I had been typing an",
"be asked separately from the post it was just added to. So: **Should",
"to review a long, obsolete comment thread before getting to more recent and",
"to a question that was unilaterally closed by a moderator. My comment expressed",
"the sake of transparency, here is the relevant comment thread (from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32394/how-can-i-tell-whether-a-mathematics-journal-seems-reputable)).",
"> A comment of mine was recently deleted without warning or acknowledgment. This",
"what circumstances moderator closure was appropriate. It included the information that I had",
"behavior: > > A comment of mine was recently deleted without warning or",
"don't directly relate to the subject of the question, and they make it",
"to be asked separately from the post it was just added to. So:",
"comment was pertaining to a question that was unilaterally closed by a moderator.",
"are typically flagged as obsolete and deleted, or deleted proactively by a moderator",
"without warning or acknowledgment. This comment was pertaining to a question that was",
"-- an opinion about in what circumstances moderator closure was appropriate. It included",
"them, they participate in the most troubling form of censorship. > > >",
"form of censorship. > > > I think this is a sufficiently important",
"typing an answer while it was unilaterally closed (another user had just said",
"it more difficult for readers, who have to review a long, obsolete comment",
"be desirable behavior: > > A comment of mine was recently deleted without",
"deleted by me after I reopened the question:   that this may not",
"or deleted proactively by a moderator who happens to see them. However, Retu",
"recently deleted without warning or acknowledgment. This comment was pertaining to a question",
"to improve it, etc. Once the question has been fixed and reopened, the",
"they're posted on?** For the sake of transparency, here is the relevant comment",
"it should be reopened, how to improve it, etc. Once the question has",
"obsolete comment thread before getting to more recent and relevant comments. Therefore, they",
"comments about whether or not the question should be closed, reasons it should",
"flagged as obsolete and deleted, or deleted proactively by a moderator who happens",
"an answer while it was unilaterally closed (another user had just said the",
"longer pertinent for purposes of improving the question. They don't directly relate to",
"they make it more difficult for readers, who have to review a long,",
"[another post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/805/is-deleting-comments-a-form-of-censorship) that this may not be desirable behavior: > > A comment",
"not the question should be closed, reasons it should be reopened, how to",
"to [another post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/805/is-deleting-comments-a-form-of-censorship) that this may not be desirable behavior: > > A",
"to the subject of the question, and they make it more difficult for",
"expressed -- wholly civilly -- an opinion about in what circumstances moderator closure",
"I think this is a sufficiently important question to be asked separately from",
"edited and improved (either by the original poster or by other users). Usually",
"me after I reopened the question:  ). The pink comments are the ones that were deleted by me after",
"by a moderator. I have made my views on this clear in this",
"They don't directly relate to the subject of the question, and they make",
"literally wasted my time and nullified my actions on this site was deleted",
"pertaining to a question that was unilaterally closed by a moderator. My comment",
"are often closed, and then reopened after they have been edited and improved",
"have made my views on this clear in this question. When moderators delete",
"were deleted by me after I reopened the question: ",
"appropriate. It included the information that I had been typing an answer while",
"not be desirable behavior: > > A comment of mine was recently deleted",
"while it was unilaterally closed (another user had just said the same). Thus",
"they become obsolete with respect to the question they're posted on?** For the",
"be reopened, how to improve it, etc. Once the question has been fixed",
"moderators delete comments that are about moderation, once they become obsolete with respect",
"sufficiently important question to be asked separately from the post it was just",
"and reopened, the comments are no longer pertinent for purposes of improving the",
"moderators delete relevant comments which pertain to them, they participate in the most",
"> > I think this is a sufficiently important question to be asked",
"here is the relevant comment thread (from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32394/how-can-i-tell-whether-a-mathematics-journal-seems-reputable)). The pink comments are",
"For the sake of transparency, here is the relevant comment thread (from [this",
"subject of the question, and they make it more difficult for readers, who",
"been edited and improved (either by the original poster or by other users).",
"with respect to the question they're posted on?** For the sake of transparency,",
"comments are no longer pertinent for purposes of improving the question. They don't",
"the question has been fixed and reopened, the comments are no longer pertinent",
"has suggested in an edit to [another post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/805/is-deleting-comments-a-form-of-censorship) that this may not be",
"answer while it was unilaterally closed (another user had just said the same).",
"by the original poster or by other users). Usually this involves an extended",
"by a moderator who happens to see them. However, Retu Zlerc has suggested",
"after I reopened the question:  ",
"my views on this clear in this question. When moderators delete relevant comments",
"included the information that I had been typing an answer while it was",
"(another user had just said the same). Thus my comment about how moderator",
"of censorship. > > > I think this is a sufficiently important question",
"have to review a long, obsolete comment thread before getting to more recent",
"may not be desirable behavior: > > A comment of mine was recently",
"before getting to more recent and relevant comments. Therefore, they are typically flagged",
"question. When moderators delete relevant comments which pertain to them, they participate in",
"added to. So: **Should moderators delete comments that are about moderation, once they",
"comment of mine was recently deleted without warning or acknowledgment. This comment was",
"mine was recently deleted without warning or acknowledgment. This comment was pertaining to",
"sake of transparency, here is the relevant comment thread (from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32394/how-can-i-tell-whether-a-mathematics-journal-seems-reputable)). The",
"the comments are no longer pertinent for purposes of improving the question. They",
"to more recent and relevant comments. Therefore, they are typically flagged as obsolete",
"(from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32394/how-can-i-tell-whether-a-mathematics-journal-seems-reputable)). The pink comments are the ones that were deleted by",
"moderator intervention literally wasted my time and nullified my actions on this site",
"think this is a sufficiently important question to be asked separately from the",
"wholly civilly -- an opinion about in what circumstances moderator closure was appropriate.",
"question has been fixed and reopened, the comments are no longer pertinent for",
"this clear in this question. When moderators delete relevant comments which pertain to",
"discussion in comments about whether or not the question should be closed, reasons",
"clear in this question. When moderators delete relevant comments which pertain to them,",
"unilaterally closed (another user had just said the same). Thus my comment about",
"been typing an answer while it was unilaterally closed (another user had just",
"it, etc. Once the question has been fixed and reopened, the comments are",
"closed (another user had just said the same). Thus my comment about how",
"a long, obsolete comment thread before getting to more recent and relevant comments.",
"moderator closure was appropriate. It included the information that I had been typing",
"post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/805/is-deleting-comments-a-form-of-censorship) that this may not be desirable behavior: > > A comment of",
"civilly -- an opinion about in what circumstances moderator closure was appropriate. It",
"comments which pertain to them, they participate in the most troubling form of",
"most troubling form of censorship. > > > I think this is a",
"acknowledgment. This comment was pertaining to a question that was unilaterally closed by",
"delete comments that are about moderation, once they become obsolete with respect to",
"user had just said the same). Thus my comment about how moderator intervention",
"comment about how moderator intervention literally wasted my time and nullified my actions",
"opinion about in what circumstances moderator closure was appropriate. It included the information",
"made my views on this clear in this question. When moderators delete relevant",
"deleted, or deleted proactively by a moderator who happens to see them. However,",
"-- wholly civilly -- an opinion about in what circumstances moderator closure was",
"wasted my time and nullified my actions on this site was deleted by",
"become obsolete with respect to the question they're posted on?** For the sake",
"important question to be asked separately from the post it was just added",
"long, obsolete comment thread before getting to more recent and relevant comments. Therefore,",
"for readers, who have to review a long, obsolete comment thread before getting",
"the most troubling form of censorship. > > > I think this is",
"the post it was just added to. So: **Should moderators delete comments that",
"more difficult for readers, who have to review a long, obsolete comment thread",
"the ones that were deleted by me after I reopened the question:  that this may not be desirable",
"information that I had been typing an answer while it was unilaterally closed",
"for purposes of improving the question. They don't directly relate to the subject",
"I had been typing an answer while it was unilaterally closed (another user",
"troubling form of censorship. > > > I think this is a sufficiently",
"they participate in the most troubling form of censorship. > > > I",
"was deleted by a moderator. I have made my views on this clear",
"are the ones that were deleted by me after I reopened the question:",
"they have been edited and improved (either by the original poster or by",
"or not the question should be closed, reasons it should be reopened, how",
"participate in the most troubling form of censorship. > > > I think",
"of improving the question. They don't directly relate to the subject of the",
"has been fixed and reopened, the comments are no longer pertinent for purposes",
"the question, and they make it more difficult for readers, who have to",
"purposes of improving the question. They don't directly relate to the subject of",
"happens to see them. However, Retu Zlerc has suggested in an edit to",
"was just added to. So: **Should moderators delete comments that are about moderation,",
"reopened after they have been edited and improved (either by the original poster",
"Once the question has been fixed and reopened, the comments are no longer",
"deleted by a moderator. I have made my views on this clear in",
"deleted without warning or acknowledgment. This comment was pertaining to a question that",
"how moderator intervention literally wasted my time and nullified my actions on this",
"moderator who happens to see them. However, Retu Zlerc has suggested in an",
"pertinent for purposes of improving the question. They don't directly relate to the",
"comment expressed -- wholly civilly -- an opinion about in what circumstances moderator",
"edit to [another post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/805/is-deleting-comments-a-form-of-censorship) that this may not be desirable behavior: > >",
"an opinion about in what circumstances moderator closure was appropriate. It included the",
"typically flagged as obsolete and deleted, or deleted proactively by a moderator who",
"by a moderator. My comment expressed -- wholly civilly -- an opinion about",
"the question should be closed, reasons it should be reopened, how to improve",
"to. So: **Should moderators delete comments that are about moderation, once they become",
"comments. Therefore, they are typically flagged as obsolete and deleted, or deleted proactively",
"closed, and then reopened after they have been edited and improved (either by",
"> I think this is a sufficiently important question to be asked separately",
"time and nullified my actions on this site was deleted by a moderator.",
"other users). Usually this involves an extended discussion in comments about whether or",
"proactively by a moderator who happens to see them. However, Retu Zlerc has",
"should be reopened, how to improve it, etc. Once the question has been",
"thread (from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32394/how-can-i-tell-whether-a-mathematics-journal-seems-reputable)). The pink comments are the ones that were deleted",
"this site was deleted by a moderator. I have made my views on",
"fixed and reopened, the comments are no longer pertinent for purposes of improving",
"that was unilaterally closed by a moderator. My comment expressed -- wholly civilly",
"or by other users). Usually this involves an extended discussion in comments about"
] |
[
"have made, and it might be counterproductive as results for a given queries",
"efforts when asking reference questions for which I have found no useful information",
"words I put in the question. It sounds a bit tedious to list",
"It sounds a bit tedious to list all queries I have made, and",
"pages of results, and I may miss some interesting results. However, some commentators",
"a [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request) question, before asking I generally Google + Google Scholar a bunch",
"so far. How can I provide evidence of my efforts when asking reference",
"of words I put in the question. It sounds a bit tedious to",
"time, etc., I only look at the few first pages of results, and",
"efforts so far. How can I provide evidence of my efforts when asking",
"and I may miss some interesting results. However, some commentators [asked me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452) provide",
"I have made, and it might be counterproductive as results for a given",
"location, time, etc., I only look at the few first pages of results,",
"only look at the few first pages of results, and I may miss",
"commentators [asked me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452) provide evidence of my efforts so far. How can I",
"question. It sounds a bit tedious to list all queries I have made,",
"ask a [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request) question, before asking I generally Google + Google Scholar a",
"interesting results. However, some commentators [asked me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452) provide evidence of my efforts so",
"me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452) provide evidence of my efforts so far. How can I provide evidence",
"made, and it might be counterproductive as results for a given queries depend",
"queries I have made, and it might be counterproductive as results for a",
"of results, and I may miss some interesting results. However, some commentators [asked",
"[reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request) question, before asking I generally Google + Google Scholar a bunch of",
"my efforts so far. How can I provide evidence of my efforts when",
"I generally Google + Google Scholar a bunch of words I put in",
"asking I generally Google + Google Scholar a bunch of words I put",
"might be counterproductive as results for a given queries depend on the location,",
"the location, time, etc., I only look at the few first pages of",
"results. However, some commentators [asked me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452) provide evidence of my efforts so far.",
"queries depend on the location, time, etc., I only look at the few",
"+ Google Scholar a bunch of words I put in the question. It",
"tedious to list all queries I have made, and it might be counterproductive",
"a bunch of words I put in the question. It sounds a bit",
"list all queries I have made, and it might be counterproductive as results",
"far. How can I provide evidence of my efforts when asking reference questions",
"asking reference questions for which I have found no useful information so far?",
"I put in the question. It sounds a bit tedious to list all",
"[asked me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452) provide evidence of my efforts so far. How can I provide",
"depend on the location, time, etc., I only look at the few first",
"may miss some interesting results. However, some commentators [asked me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452) provide evidence of",
"etc., I only look at the few first pages of results, and I",
"I provide evidence of my efforts when asking reference questions for which I",
"when asking reference questions for which I have found no useful information so",
"results, and I may miss some interesting results. However, some commentators [asked me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452)",
"a bit tedious to list all queries I have made, and it might",
"How can I provide evidence of my efforts when asking reference questions for",
"it might be counterproductive as results for a given queries depend on the",
"evidence of my efforts so far. How can I provide evidence of my",
"provide evidence of my efforts when asking reference questions for which I have",
"on the location, time, etc., I only look at the few first pages",
"few first pages of results, and I may miss some interesting results. However,",
"question, before asking I generally Google + Google Scholar a bunch of words",
"all queries I have made, and it might be counterproductive as results for",
"and it might be counterproductive as results for a given queries depend on",
"given queries depend on the location, time, etc., I only look at the",
"can I provide evidence of my efforts when asking reference questions for which",
"miss some interesting results. However, some commentators [asked me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452) provide evidence of my",
"before asking I generally Google + Google Scholar a bunch of words I",
"evidence of my efforts when asking reference questions for which I have found",
"results for a given queries depend on the location, time, etc., I only",
"some commentators [asked me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452) provide evidence of my efforts so far. How can",
"sounds a bit tedious to list all queries I have made, and it",
"bit tedious to list all queries I have made, and it might be",
"to list all queries I have made, and it might be counterproductive as",
"put in the question. It sounds a bit tedious to list all queries",
"Scholar a bunch of words I put in the question. It sounds a",
"some interesting results. However, some commentators [asked me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452) provide evidence of my efforts",
"Google Scholar a bunch of words I put in the question. It sounds",
"a given queries depend on the location, time, etc., I only look at",
"I only look at the few first pages of results, and I may",
"generally Google + Google Scholar a bunch of words I put in the",
"of my efforts when asking reference questions for which I have found no",
"of my efforts so far. How can I provide evidence of my efforts",
"look at the few first pages of results, and I may miss some",
"counterproductive as results for a given queries depend on the location, time, etc.,",
"However, some commentators [asked me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452) provide evidence of my efforts so far. How",
"as results for a given queries depend on the location, time, etc., I",
"my efforts when asking reference questions for which I have found no useful",
"the question. It sounds a bit tedious to list all queries I have",
"provide evidence of my efforts so far. How can I provide evidence of",
"When I ask a [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request) question, before asking I generally Google + Google",
"the few first pages of results, and I may miss some interesting results.",
"first pages of results, and I may miss some interesting results. However, some",
"at the few first pages of results, and I may miss some interesting",
"bunch of words I put in the question. It sounds a bit tedious",
"for a given queries depend on the location, time, etc., I only look",
"in the question. It sounds a bit tedious to list all queries I",
"I may miss some interesting results. However, some commentators [asked me](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/452) provide evidence",
"I ask a [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request) question, before asking I generally Google + Google Scholar",
"Google + Google Scholar a bunch of words I put in the question.",
"be counterproductive as results for a given queries depend on the location, time,"
] |
[
"How broad can I make my question? For example: > > What do",
"to etiquette and other social niceties? > > > is a very broad",
"go there), and if you remove the 'academia' part, it's non-obvious that the",
"answers. > > What are some good resources for preparing to study in",
"if you remove the 'academia' part, it's non-obvious that the question remains specific",
"something useful to a large number of others)? Is this an appropriate venue",
"for short, link-based answers, and even though it is probably helpful to me",
"a bit poll-y) but it's a bit too meta for my taste and",
"thus something useful to a large number of others)? Is this an appropriate",
"you remove the 'academia' part, it's non-obvious that the question remains specific to",
"etiquette and other social niceties? > > > is a very broad question,",
"on a first meeting? > > > is specific, but as I am",
"short, link-based answers, and even though it is probably helpful to me (although",
"academia with respect to etiquette and other social niceties? > > > is",
"ask on Academia.SE before I go to Japan for 4 months to prevent",
"4 months to prevent embarrassing myself? > > > technically fits your guidelines",
"question, but is likely to give long, high quality answers that explain \"how\",",
"is an open ended question, that has an infinitude of potentially correct answers,",
"my question? For example: > > What do I need to know before",
"answers, and even though it is probably helpful to me (although Googling hasn't",
"I go to Japan for 4 months to prevent embarrassing myself? > >",
"before I go to Japan for 4 months to prevent embarrassing myself? >",
"between British and Japanese culture). > > Do I need to bring omiyage",
"are massively overshadowed by the general differences between British and Japanese culture). >",
"massively helpful) it isn't a high-quality question. How can I ask my question",
"know (i.e. what's going to trip me up when I go there), and",
"travelling to Japan for an academic fellowship? > > > is an open",
"Japanese culture). > > Do I need to bring omiyage for my host",
"of questions, most of which will have insignificant answers, as I don't know",
"remains specific to the site (as presumably the differences between Japanese academia and",
"example: > > What do I need to know before travelling to Japan",
"> > > technically fits your guidelines (although it is a bit poll-y)",
"is actively promoting, and thus something useful to a large number of others)?",
"to the site (as presumably the differences between Japanese academia and British academia",
"insignificant answers, as I don't know in advance what will be different. >",
"as such I want to ask questions about Japanese academia. How broad can",
"make my question? For example: > > What do I need to know",
"other social niceties? > > > is a very broad question, but is",
"it is probably helpful to me (although Googling hasn't really found me anything",
"large number of questions, most of which will have insignificant answers, as I",
"open ended question, that has an infinitude of potentially correct answers, and thus",
"an infinitude of potentially correct answers, and thus doesn't really fall inside your",
"\"how\", and invites experience based answers. However it doesn't really tell me what",
"differences between British and Japanese culture). > > Do I need to bring",
"> > > is specific, but as I am unfamiliar with Japanese culture",
"hasn't really found me anything massively helpful) it isn't a high-quality question. How",
"of what do I need to know. Furthermore I'll end up asking a",
"an academic fellowship? > > > is an open ended question, that has",
"question of what do I need to know. Furthermore I'll end up asking",
"is a very broad question, but is likely to give long, high quality",
"> > Do I need to bring omiyage for my host on a",
"planning short-term study in Japan (something the Japanese government is actively promoting, and",
"should I ask on Academia.SE before I go to Japan for 4 months",
"question at all? Is this question always going to fall under the category",
"> What questions should I ask on Academia.SE before I go to Japan",
"embarrassing myself? > > > technically fits your guidelines (although it is a",
"when I go there), and if you remove the 'academia' part, it's non-obvious",
"to trip me up when I go there), and if you remove the",
"question, that has an infinitude of potentially correct answers, and thus doesn't really",
"it doesn't really tell me what I need to know (i.e. what's going",
"trip me up when I go there), and if you remove the 'academia'",
"really fall inside your guidelines. > > How does British academia differ from",
"need to know. Furthermore I'll end up asking a large number of questions,",
"though it is probably helpful to me (although Googling hasn't really found me",
"niceties? > > > is a very broad question, but is likely to",
"I get answers that are useful to other people planning short-term study in",
"broad question, but is likely to give long, high quality answers that explain",
"I want to ask questions about Japanese academia. How broad can I make",
"the site (as presumably the differences between Japanese academia and British academia are",
"> > > is an open ended question, that has an infinitude of",
"that the question remains specific to the site (as presumably the differences between",
"most of which will have insignificant answers, as I don't know in advance",
"a high-quality question. How can I ask my question in a way that",
"such I want to ask questions about Japanese academia. How broad can I",
"quality answers that explain \"how\", and invites experience based answers. However it doesn't",
"found me anything massively helpful) it isn't a high-quality question. How can I",
"want to ask questions about Japanese academia. How broad can I make my",
"but is likely to give long, high quality answers that explain \"how\", and",
"Academia.SE before I go to Japan for 4 months to prevent embarrassing myself?",
"have insignificant answers, as I don't know in advance what will be different.",
"academia and British academia are massively overshadowed by the general differences between British",
"number of others)? Is this an appropriate venue for such a question at",
"> > technically fits your guidelines (although it is a bit poll-y) but",
"and thus something useful to a large number of others)? Is this an",
"social niceties? > > > is a very broad question, but is likely",
"a way that I get answers that are useful to other people planning",
"as I don't know in advance what will be different. > > What",
"just asking for short, link-based answers, and even though it is probably helpful",
"some good resources for preparing to study in Japan? > > > is",
"Is this an appropriate venue for such a question at all? Is this",
"my taste and is likely to give bad answers. > > What are",
"your guidelines. > > How does British academia differ from Japanese academia with",
"me (although Googling hasn't really found me anything massively helpful) it isn't a",
"prevent embarrassing myself? > > > technically fits your guidelines (although it is",
"go to Japan for 4 months to prevent embarrassing myself? > > >",
"to Japan for an academic fellowship? > > > is an open ended",
"is obviously just asking for short, link-based answers, and even though it is",
"differences between Japanese academia and British academia are massively overshadowed by the general",
"answers, as I don't know in advance what will be different. > >",
"I need to know. Furthermore I'll end up asking a large number of",
"(as presumably the differences between Japanese academia and British academia are massively overshadowed",
"Japan (something the Japanese government is actively promoting, and thus something useful to",
"to do research in Japan for 4 months, as such I want to",
"specific, but as I am unfamiliar with Japanese culture I don't know what",
"British academia are massively overshadowed by the general differences between British and Japanese",
"specific to the site (as presumably the differences between Japanese academia and British",
"tell me what I need to know (i.e. what's going to trip me",
"ask questions about Japanese academia. How broad can I make my question? For",
"broad can I make my question? For example: > > What do I",
"fits your guidelines (although it is a bit poll-y) but it's a bit",
"am going to do research in Japan for 4 months, as such I",
"site (as presumably the differences between Japanese academia and British academia are massively",
"> is specific, but as I am unfamiliar with Japanese culture I don't",
"it isn't a high-quality question. How can I ask my question in a",
"different. > > What questions should I ask on Academia.SE before I go",
"really found me anything massively helpful) it isn't a high-quality question. How can",
"a bit too meta for my taste and is likely to give bad",
"respect to etiquette and other social niceties? > > > is a very",
"I need to bring omiyage for my host on a first meeting? >",
"Japan? > > > is obviously just asking for short, link-based answers, and",
"non-obvious that the question remains specific to the site (as presumably the differences",
"> > > is obviously just asking for short, link-based answers, and even",
"and Japanese culture). > > Do I need to bring omiyage for my",
"I ask my question in a way that I get answers that are",
"promoting, and thus something useful to a large number of others)? Is this",
"and even though it is probably helpful to me (although Googling hasn't really",
"What do I need to know before travelling to Japan for an academic",
"at all? Is this question always going to fall under the category of",
"will be different. > > What questions should I ask on Academia.SE before",
"inside your guidelines. > > How does British academia differ from Japanese academia",
"even though it is probably helpful to me (although Googling hasn't really found",
"helpful to me (although Googling hasn't really found me anything massively helpful) it",
"and other social niceties? > > > is a very broad question, but",
"to give long, high quality answers that explain \"how\", and invites experience based",
"> > What do I need to know before travelling to Japan for",
"What are some good resources for preparing to study in Japan? > >",
"my real question of what do I need to know. Furthermore I'll end",
"I'll end up asking a large number of questions, most of which will",
"and is likely to give bad answers. > > What are some good",
"so it doesn't answer my real question of what do I need to",
"> > What are some good resources for preparing to study in Japan?",
"to a large number of others)? Is this an appropriate venue for such",
"in Japan (something the Japanese government is actively promoting, and thus something useful",
"bit too meta for my taste and is likely to give bad answers.",
"> Do I need to bring omiyage for my host on a first",
"I am going to do research in Japan for 4 months, as such",
"a large number of questions, most of which will have insignificant answers, as",
"such a question at all? Is this question always going to fall under",
"doesn't really fall inside your guidelines. > > How does British academia differ",
"of which will have insignificant answers, as I don't know in advance what",
"high quality answers that explain \"how\", and invites experience based answers. However it",
"answers. However it doesn't really tell me what I need to know (i.e.",
"based answers. However it doesn't really tell me what I need to know",
"unfamiliar with Japanese culture I don't know what questions I need to ask,",
"> > is a very broad question, but is likely to give long,",
"but as I am unfamiliar with Japanese culture I don't know what questions",
"too meta for my taste and is likely to give bad answers. >",
"research in Japan for 4 months, as such I want to ask questions",
"will have insignificant answers, as I don't know in advance what will be",
"advance what will be different. > > What questions should I ask on",
"to study in Japan? > > > is obviously just asking for short,",
"to know (i.e. what's going to trip me up when I go there),",
"can I ask my question in a way that I get answers that",
"guidelines (although it is a bit poll-y) but it's a bit too meta",
"a large number of others)? Is this an appropriate venue for such a",
"by the general differences between British and Japanese culture). > > Do I",
"> > is obviously just asking for short, link-based answers, and even though",
"and thus doesn't really fall inside your guidelines. > > How does British",
"answers, and thus doesn't really fall inside your guidelines. > > How does",
"experience based answers. However it doesn't really tell me what I need to",
"meta for my taste and is likely to give bad answers. > >",
"in advance what will be different. > > What questions should I ask",
"> > > is a very broad question, but is likely to give",
"but it's a bit too meta for my taste and is likely to",
"know. Furthermore I'll end up asking a large number of questions, most of",
"asking for short, link-based answers, and even though it is probably helpful to",
"others)? Is this an appropriate venue for such a question at all? Is",
"before travelling to Japan for an academic fellowship? > > > is an",
"I need to know (i.e. what's going to trip me up when I",
"fellowship? > > > is an open ended question, that has an infinitude",
"is likely to give bad answers. > > What are some good resources",
"don't know in advance what will be different. > > What questions should",
"what's going to trip me up when I go there), and if you",
"helpful) it isn't a high-quality question. How can I ask my question in",
"massively overshadowed by the general differences between British and Japanese culture). > >",
"very broad question, but is likely to give long, high quality answers that",
"is specific, but as I am unfamiliar with Japanese culture I don't know",
"the question remains specific to the site (as presumably the differences between Japanese",
"it's non-obvious that the question remains specific to the site (as presumably the",
"is probably helpful to me (although Googling hasn't really found me anything massively",
"appropriate venue for such a question at all? Is this question always going",
"explain \"how\", and invites experience based answers. However it doesn't really tell me",
"likely to give long, high quality answers that explain \"how\", and invites experience",
"to give bad answers. > > What are some good resources for preparing",
"has an infinitude of potentially correct answers, and thus doesn't really fall inside",
"short-term study in Japan (something the Japanese government is actively promoting, and thus",
"thus doesn't really fall inside your guidelines. > > How does British academia",
"people planning short-term study in Japan (something the Japanese government is actively promoting,",
"question remains specific to the site (as presumably the differences between Japanese academia",
"to Japan for 4 months to prevent embarrassing myself? > > > technically",
"question. How can I ask my question in a way that I get",
"general differences between British and Japanese culture). > > Do I need to",
"taste and is likely to give bad answers. > > What are some",
"actively promoting, and thus something useful to a large number of others)? Is",
"that has an infinitude of potentially correct answers, and thus doesn't really fall",
"Japanese government is actively promoting, and thus something useful to a large number",
"guidelines. > > How does British academia differ from Japanese academia with respect",
"with Japanese culture I don't know what questions I need to ask, so",
"culture I don't know what questions I need to ask, so it doesn't",
"there), and if you remove the 'academia' part, it's non-obvious that the question",
"Do I need to bring omiyage for my host on a first meeting?",
"link-based answers, and even though it is probably helpful to me (although Googling",
"I need to ask, so it doesn't answer my real question of what",
"give long, high quality answers that explain \"how\", and invites experience based answers.",
"question in a way that I get answers that are useful to other",
"to ask, so it doesn't answer my real question of what do I",
"what will be different. > > What questions should I ask on Academia.SE",
"How can I ask my question in a way that I get answers",
"asking a large number of questions, most of which will have insignificant answers,",
"academia are massively overshadowed by the general differences between British and Japanese culture).",
"need to ask, so it doesn't answer my real question of what do",
"doesn't really tell me what I need to know (i.e. what's going to",
"For example: > > What do I need to know before travelling to",
"anything massively helpful) it isn't a high-quality question. How can I ask my",
"(i.e. what's going to trip me up when I go there), and if",
"that are useful to other people planning short-term study in Japan (something the",
"Japan for an academic fellowship? > > > is an open ended question,",
"overshadowed by the general differences between British and Japanese culture). > > Do",
"for an academic fellowship? > > > is an open ended question, that",
"useful to a large number of others)? Is this an appropriate venue for",
"How does British academia differ from Japanese academia with respect to etiquette and",
"I don't know in advance what will be different. > > What questions",
"what I need to know (i.e. what's going to trip me up when",
"what do I need to know. Furthermore I'll end up asking a large",
"me what I need to know (i.e. what's going to trip me up",
"to ask questions about Japanese academia. How broad can I make my question?",
"need to know (i.e. what's going to trip me up when I go",
"between Japanese academia and British academia are massively overshadowed by the general differences",
"get answers that are useful to other people planning short-term study in Japan",
"the Japanese government is actively promoting, and thus something useful to a large",
"for preparing to study in Japan? > > > is obviously just asking",
"'academia' part, it's non-obvious that the question remains specific to the site (as",
"government is actively promoting, and thus something useful to a large number of",
"way that I get answers that are useful to other people planning short-term",
"questions I need to ask, so it doesn't answer my real question of",
"(although it is a bit poll-y) but it's a bit too meta for",
"up asking a large number of questions, most of which will have insignificant",
"can I make my question? For example: > > What do I need",
"> is an open ended question, that has an infinitude of potentially correct",
"ask, so it doesn't answer my real question of what do I need",
"months, as such I want to ask questions about Japanese academia. How broad",
"4 months, as such I want to ask questions about Japanese academia. How",
"to other people planning short-term study in Japan (something the Japanese government is",
"in a way that I get answers that are useful to other people",
"obviously just asking for short, link-based answers, and even though it is probably",
"the 'academia' part, it's non-obvious that the question remains specific to the site",
"I need to know before travelling to Japan for an academic fellowship? >",
"with respect to etiquette and other social niceties? > > > is a",
"> What are some good resources for preparing to study in Japan? >",
"Japanese academia and British academia are massively overshadowed by the general differences between",
"omiyage for my host on a first meeting? > > > is specific,",
"it is a bit poll-y) but it's a bit too meta for my",
"> How does British academia differ from Japanese academia with respect to etiquette",
"meeting? > > > is specific, but as I am unfamiliar with Japanese",
"technically fits your guidelines (although it is a bit poll-y) but it's a",
"going to do research in Japan for 4 months, as such I want",
"of others)? Is this an appropriate venue for such a question at all?",
"my host on a first meeting? > > > is specific, but as",
"bit poll-y) but it's a bit too meta for my taste and is",
"ask my question in a way that I get answers that are useful",
"Japan for 4 months to prevent embarrassing myself? > > > technically fits",
"questions about Japanese academia. How broad can I make my question? For example:",
"first meeting? > > > is specific, but as I am unfamiliar with",
"know before travelling to Japan for an academic fellowship? > > > is",
"end up asking a large number of questions, most of which will have",
"Japanese culture I don't know what questions I need to ask, so it",
"However it doesn't really tell me what I need to know (i.e. what's",
"it's a bit too meta for my taste and is likely to give",
"Japan for 4 months, as such I want to ask questions about Japanese",
"I ask on Academia.SE before I go to Japan for 4 months to",
"to know before travelling to Japan for an academic fellowship? > > >",
"long, high quality answers that explain \"how\", and invites experience based answers. However",
"I make my question? For example: > > What do I need to",
"useful to other people planning short-term study in Japan (something the Japanese government",
"likely to give bad answers. > > What are some good resources for",
"British academia differ from Japanese academia with respect to etiquette and other social",
"me up when I go there), and if you remove the 'academia' part,",
"poll-y) but it's a bit too meta for my taste and is likely",
"Japanese academia. How broad can I make my question? For example: > >",
"academia. How broad can I make my question? For example: > > What",
"up when I go there), and if you remove the 'academia' part, it's",
"remove the 'academia' part, it's non-obvious that the question remains specific to the",
"to prevent embarrassing myself? > > > technically fits your guidelines (although it",
"British and Japanese culture). > > Do I need to bring omiyage for",
"myself? > > > technically fits your guidelines (although it is a bit",
"correct answers, and thus doesn't really fall inside your guidelines. > > How",
"my question in a way that I get answers that are useful to",
"answers that are useful to other people planning short-term study in Japan (something",
"ended question, that has an infinitude of potentially correct answers, and thus doesn't",
"is a bit poll-y) but it's a bit too meta for my taste",
"are useful to other people planning short-term study in Japan (something the Japanese",
"preparing to study in Japan? > > > is obviously just asking for",
"do research in Japan for 4 months, as such I want to ask",
"don't know what questions I need to ask, so it doesn't answer my",
"other people planning short-term study in Japan (something the Japanese government is actively",
"a very broad question, but is likely to give long, high quality answers",
"to bring omiyage for my host on a first meeting? > > >",
"need to know before travelling to Japan for an academic fellowship? > >",
"for my host on a first meeting? > > > is specific, but",
"> > How does British academia differ from Japanese academia with respect to",
"are some good resources for preparing to study in Japan? > > >",
"questions, most of which will have insignificant answers, as I don't know in",
"(although Googling hasn't really found me anything massively helpful) it isn't a high-quality",
"presumably the differences between Japanese academia and British academia are massively overshadowed by",
"and if you remove the 'academia' part, it's non-obvious that the question remains",
"answer my real question of what do I need to know. Furthermore I'll",
"in Japan for 4 months, as such I want to ask questions about",
"Googling hasn't really found me anything massively helpful) it isn't a high-quality question.",
"me anything massively helpful) it isn't a high-quality question. How can I ask",
"number of questions, most of which will have insignificant answers, as I don't",
"> technically fits your guidelines (although it is a bit poll-y) but it's",
"What questions should I ask on Academia.SE before I go to Japan for",
"for 4 months to prevent embarrassing myself? > > > technically fits your",
"invites experience based answers. However it doesn't really tell me what I need",
"question? For example: > > What do I need to know before travelling",
"study in Japan? > > > is obviously just asking for short, link-based",
"good resources for preparing to study in Japan? > > > is obviously",
"months to prevent embarrassing myself? > > > technically fits your guidelines (although",
"academic fellowship? > > > is an open ended question, that has an",
"culture). > > Do I need to bring omiyage for my host on",
"an appropriate venue for such a question at all? Is this question always",
"> > What questions should I ask on Academia.SE before I go to",
"(something the Japanese government is actively promoting, and thus something useful to a",
"I don't know what questions I need to ask, so it doesn't answer",
"need to bring omiyage for my host on a first meeting? > >",
"all? Is this question always going to fall under the category of too-localised?",
"> is obviously just asking for short, link-based answers, and even though it",
"as I am unfamiliar with Japanese culture I don't know what questions I",
"on Academia.SE before I go to Japan for 4 months to prevent embarrassing",
"be different. > > What questions should I ask on Academia.SE before I",
"what questions I need to ask, so it doesn't answer my real question",
"for my taste and is likely to give bad answers. > > What",
"Furthermore I'll end up asking a large number of questions, most of which",
"for such a question at all? Is this question always going to fall",
"am unfamiliar with Japanese culture I don't know what questions I need to",
"large number of others)? Is this an appropriate venue for such a question",
"a first meeting? > > > is specific, but as I am unfamiliar",
"isn't a high-quality question. How can I ask my question in a way",
"answers that explain \"how\", and invites experience based answers. However it doesn't really",
"this an appropriate venue for such a question at all? Is this question",
"for 4 months, as such I want to ask questions about Japanese academia.",
"going to trip me up when I go there), and if you remove",
"venue for such a question at all? Is this question always going to",
"resources for preparing to study in Japan? > > > is obviously just",
"> > is an open ended question, that has an infinitude of potentially",
"and invites experience based answers. However it doesn't really tell me what I",
"really tell me what I need to know (i.e. what's going to trip",
"doesn't answer my real question of what do I need to know. Furthermore",
"probably helpful to me (although Googling hasn't really found me anything massively helpful)",
"that explain \"how\", and invites experience based answers. However it doesn't really tell",
"differ from Japanese academia with respect to etiquette and other social niceties? >",
"give bad answers. > > What are some good resources for preparing to",
"know in advance what will be different. > > What questions should I",
"bad answers. > > What are some good resources for preparing to study",
"your guidelines (although it is a bit poll-y) but it's a bit too",
"I am unfamiliar with Japanese culture I don't know what questions I need",
"to me (although Googling hasn't really found me anything massively helpful) it isn't",
"from Japanese academia with respect to etiquette and other social niceties? > >",
"study in Japan (something the Japanese government is actively promoting, and thus something",
"host on a first meeting? > > > is specific, but as I",
"an open ended question, that has an infinitude of potentially correct answers, and",
"is likely to give long, high quality answers that explain \"how\", and invites",
"questions should I ask on Academia.SE before I go to Japan for 4",
"do I need to know before travelling to Japan for an academic fellowship?",
"the general differences between British and Japanese culture). > > Do I need",
"> is a very broad question, but is likely to give long, high",
"know what questions I need to ask, so it doesn't answer my real",
"that I get answers that are useful to other people planning short-term study",
"> What do I need to know before travelling to Japan for an",
"high-quality question. How can I ask my question in a way that I",
"part, it's non-obvious that the question remains specific to the site (as presumably",
"does British academia differ from Japanese academia with respect to etiquette and other",
"it doesn't answer my real question of what do I need to know.",
"real question of what do I need to know. Furthermore I'll end up",
"about Japanese academia. How broad can I make my question? For example: >",
"Japanese academia with respect to etiquette and other social niceties? > > >",
"do I need to know. Furthermore I'll end up asking a large number",
"and British academia are massively overshadowed by the general differences between British and",
"academia differ from Japanese academia with respect to etiquette and other social niceties?",
"in Japan? > > > is obviously just asking for short, link-based answers,",
"the differences between Japanese academia and British academia are massively overshadowed by the",
"fall inside your guidelines. > > How does British academia differ from Japanese",
"> > is specific, but as I am unfamiliar with Japanese culture I",
"to know. Furthermore I'll end up asking a large number of questions, most",
"of potentially correct answers, and thus doesn't really fall inside your guidelines. >",
"which will have insignificant answers, as I don't know in advance what will",
"I go there), and if you remove the 'academia' part, it's non-obvious that",
"a question at all? Is this question always going to fall under the",
"bring omiyage for my host on a first meeting? > > > is",
"infinitude of potentially correct answers, and thus doesn't really fall inside your guidelines.",
"potentially correct answers, and thus doesn't really fall inside your guidelines. > >"
] |
[
"issue, we need a resolution. What I need to know before unlocking the",
"the name of the individual who is being \"accused\" of closing questions too",
"leave a comment, suggest the potential duplicate and leave the community to decide.",
"focused on the content of the particular answer so that we can reach",
"heard. Despite the titular question, I would like to keep the discussion/answers focused",
"being named, I think it is important to let the community voice be",
"a resolution and unlock the valuable answer. I would be happy to see",
"is a moderation or moderator issue, we need a resolution. What I need",
"and unlock the valuable answer. I would be happy to see a more",
"important to let the community voice be heard. Despite the titular question, I",
"who is being \"accused\" of closing questions too frequently add value to the",
"named, I think it is important to let the community voice be heard.",
"particular answer so that we can reach a resolution and unlock the valuable",
"a moderation or moderator issue, we need a resolution. What I need to",
"comment, suggest the potential duplicate and leave the community to decide. > >",
"answer so that we can reach a resolution and unlock the valuable answer.",
"> As it is a moderator who is being named, I think it",
"the valuable answer. I would be happy to see a more general discussion",
"of the individual who is being \"accused\" of closing questions too frequently add",
"unlocking the question is: **Does including the name of the individual who is",
"the individual who is being \"accused\" of closing questions too frequently add value",
"decide. > > > As it is a moderator who is being named,",
"in [this meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1385/929) is being disputed. The dispute revolves around an individual",
"to know before unlocking the question is: **Does including the name of the",
"like to keep the discussion/answers focused on the content of the particular answer",
"is being disputed. The dispute revolves around an individual being singled out in",
"question is: **Does including the name of the individual who is being \"accused\"",
"potential duplicates) unilaterally; any moderator can leave a comment, suggest the potential duplicate",
"questions (e.g. as in potential duplicates) unilaterally; any moderator can leave a comment,",
"> > > As it is a moderator who is being named, I",
"is: **Does including the name of the individual who is being \"accused\" of",
"dispute revolves around an individual being singled out in the answer. The sentence",
"to keep the discussion/answers focused on the content of the particular answer so",
"discussion in another meta question, but as this is a moderation or moderator",
"the question is: **Does including the name of the individual who is being",
"the answer. The sentence in question, without the individual named is: > >",
"unilaterally; any moderator can leave a comment, suggest the potential duplicate and leave",
"to let the community voice be heard. Despite the titular question, I would",
"What I need to know before unlocking the question is: **Does including the",
"is being named, I think it is important to let the community voice",
"answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1385/929) is being disputed. The dispute revolves around an individual being singled out",
"as this is a moderation or moderator issue, we need a resolution. What",
"individual named is: > > There is simply no need to close questions",
"reach a resolution and unlock the valuable answer. I would be happy to",
"titular question, I would like to keep the discussion/answers focused on the content",
"meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1385/929) is being disputed. The dispute revolves around an individual being singled",
"community voice be heard. Despite the titular question, I would like to keep",
"The sentence in question, without the individual named is: > > There is",
"no need to close questions (e.g. as in potential duplicates) unilaterally; any moderator",
"any moderator can leave a comment, suggest the potential duplicate and leave the",
"discussion/answers focused on the content of the particular answer so that we can",
"leave the community to decide. > > > As it is a moderator",
"to close questions (e.g. as in potential duplicates) unilaterally; any moderator can leave",
"potential duplicate and leave the community to decide. > > > As it",
"in the answer. The sentence in question, without the individual named is: >",
"revolves around an individual being singled out in the answer. The sentence in",
"close questions (e.g. as in potential duplicates) unilaterally; any moderator can leave a",
"As it is a moderator who is being named, I think it is",
"more general discussion in another meta question, but as this is a moderation",
"There is simply no need to close questions (e.g. as in potential duplicates)",
"but as this is a moderation or moderator issue, we need a resolution.",
"duplicate and leave the community to decide. > > > As it is",
"on the content of the particular answer so that we can reach a",
"I think it is important to let the community voice be heard. Despite",
"of the particular answer so that we can reach a resolution and unlock",
"disputed. The dispute revolves around an individual being singled out in the answer.",
"and leave the community to decide. > > > As it is a",
"I would like to keep the discussion/answers focused on the content of the",
"need to know before unlocking the question is: **Does including the name of",
"is: > > There is simply no need to close questions (e.g. as",
"the individual named is: > > There is simply no need to close",
"[this meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1385/929) is being disputed. The dispute revolves around an individual being",
"to see a more general discussion in another meta question, but as this",
"is being \"accused\" of closing questions too frequently add value to the question**",
"we can reach a resolution and unlock the valuable answer. I would be",
"being singled out in the answer. The sentence in question, without the individual",
"moderation or moderator issue, we need a resolution. What I need to know",
"name of the individual who is being \"accused\" of closing questions too frequently",
"question, without the individual named is: > > There is simply no need",
"resolution and unlock the valuable answer. I would be happy to see a",
"individual who is being \"accused\" of closing questions too frequently add value to",
"the content of the particular answer so that we can reach a resolution",
"answer. The sentence in question, without the individual named is: > > There",
"> > There is simply no need to close questions (e.g. as in",
"can reach a resolution and unlock the valuable answer. I would be happy",
"without the individual named is: > > There is simply no need to",
"> There is simply no need to close questions (e.g. as in potential",
"is a moderator who is being named, I think it is important to",
"this is a moderation or moderator issue, we need a resolution. What I",
"can leave a comment, suggest the potential duplicate and leave the community to",
"keep the discussion/answers focused on the content of the particular answer so that",
"duplicates) unilaterally; any moderator can leave a comment, suggest the potential duplicate and",
"in question, without the individual named is: > > There is simply no",
"the potential duplicate and leave the community to decide. > > > As",
"(e.g. as in potential duplicates) unilaterally; any moderator can leave a comment, suggest",
"the titular question, I would like to keep the discussion/answers focused on the",
"> > As it is a moderator who is being named, I think",
"in potential duplicates) unilaterally; any moderator can leave a comment, suggest the potential",
"singled out in the answer. The sentence in question, without the individual named",
"the community voice be heard. Despite the titular question, I would like to",
"the particular answer so that we can reach a resolution and unlock the",
"would like to keep the discussion/answers focused on the content of the particular",
"including the name of the individual who is being \"accused\" of closing questions",
"being disputed. The dispute revolves around an individual being singled out in the",
"a resolution. What I need to know before unlocking the question is: **Does",
"it is important to let the community voice be heard. Despite the titular",
"or moderator issue, we need a resolution. What I need to know before",
"before unlocking the question is: **Does including the name of the individual who",
"around an individual being singled out in the answer. The sentence in question,",
"a comment, suggest the potential duplicate and leave the community to decide. >",
"a moderator who is being named, I think it is important to let",
"as in potential duplicates) unilaterally; any moderator can leave a comment, suggest the",
"moderator can leave a comment, suggest the potential duplicate and leave the community",
"moderator who is being named, I think it is important to let the",
"a more general discussion in another meta question, but as this is a",
"is important to let the community voice be heard. Despite the titular question,",
"named is: > > There is simply no need to close questions (e.g.",
"content of the particular answer so that we can reach a resolution and",
"so that we can reach a resolution and unlock the valuable answer. I",
"meta question, but as this is a moderation or moderator issue, we need",
"The content in [this meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1385/929) is being disputed. The dispute revolves around",
"Despite the titular question, I would like to keep the discussion/answers focused on",
"moderator issue, we need a resolution. What I need to know before unlocking",
"know before unlocking the question is: **Does including the name of the individual",
"to decide. > > > As it is a moderator who is being",
"who is being named, I think it is important to let the community",
"see a more general discussion in another meta question, but as this is",
"in another meta question, but as this is a moderation or moderator issue,",
"I need to know before unlocking the question is: **Does including the name",
"is simply no need to close questions (e.g. as in potential duplicates) unilaterally;",
"valuable answer. I would be happy to see a more general discussion in",
"think it is important to let the community voice be heard. Despite the",
"an individual being singled out in the answer. The sentence in question, without",
"suggest the potential duplicate and leave the community to decide. > > >",
"that we can reach a resolution and unlock the valuable answer. I would",
"need a resolution. What I need to know before unlocking the question is:",
"we need a resolution. What I need to know before unlocking the question",
"The dispute revolves around an individual being singled out in the answer. The",
"out in the answer. The sentence in question, without the individual named is:",
"general discussion in another meta question, but as this is a moderation or",
"question, I would like to keep the discussion/answers focused on the content of",
"question, but as this is a moderation or moderator issue, we need a",
"sentence in question, without the individual named is: > > There is simply",
"let the community voice be heard. Despite the titular question, I would like",
"would be happy to see a more general discussion in another meta question,",
"individual being singled out in the answer. The sentence in question, without the",
"the community to decide. > > > As it is a moderator who",
"another meta question, but as this is a moderation or moderator issue, we",
"answer. I would be happy to see a more general discussion in another",
"community to decide. > > > As it is a moderator who is",
"**Does including the name of the individual who is being \"accused\" of closing",
"be happy to see a more general discussion in another meta question, but",
"the discussion/answers focused on the content of the particular answer so that we",
"unlock the valuable answer. I would be happy to see a more general",
"simply no need to close questions (e.g. as in potential duplicates) unilaterally; any",
"it is a moderator who is being named, I think it is important",
"I would be happy to see a more general discussion in another meta",
"content in [this meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1385/929) is being disputed. The dispute revolves around an",
"be heard. Despite the titular question, I would like to keep the discussion/answers",
"need to close questions (e.g. as in potential duplicates) unilaterally; any moderator can",
"voice be heard. Despite the titular question, I would like to keep the",
"happy to see a more general discussion in another meta question, but as",
"resolution. What I need to know before unlocking the question is: **Does including"
] |
[
"a useful chat/meta discussion, unfortunately the only options available to moderators is to",
"all the comments form a discussion that is not relevant to the question,",
"to moderators is to leave the comments or delete the comments. Should the",
"sensitive to moderator deleting comments that are related to moderator behaviour. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle)",
"only options available to moderators is to leave the comments or delete the",
"community is particularly sensitive to moderator deleting comments that are related to moderator",
"comments that are related to moderator behaviour. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle) has a \"not constructive\"",
"brought it to my attention. It seems to me that all the comments",
"not relevant to the question, but may be the basis of a useful",
"options available to moderators is to leave the comments or delete the comments.",
"to moderator deleting comments that are related to moderator behaviour. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle) has",
"the basis of a useful chat/meta discussion, unfortunately the only options available to",
"useful chat/meta discussion, unfortunately the only options available to moderators is to leave",
"is to leave the comments or delete the comments. Should the comments be",
"of a useful chat/meta discussion, unfortunately the only options available to moderators is",
"recent discussions on meta, it seems the community is particularly sensitive to moderator",
"deleting comments that are related to moderator behaviour. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle) has a \"not",
"on meta, it seems the community is particularly sensitive to moderator deleting comments",
"meta, it seems the community is particularly sensitive to moderator deleting comments that",
"seems the community is particularly sensitive to moderator deleting comments that are related",
"related to moderator behaviour. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle) has a \"not constructive\" flag raised against",
"particularly sensitive to moderator deleting comments that are related to moderator behaviour. [This",
"moderators is to leave the comments or delete the comments. Should the comments",
"the question, but may be the basis of a useful chat/meta discussion, unfortunately",
"basis of a useful chat/meta discussion, unfortunately the only options available to moderators",
"to my attention. It seems to me that all the comments form a",
"a discussion that is not relevant to the question, but may be the",
"unfortunately the only options available to moderators is to leave the comments or",
"chat/meta discussion, unfortunately the only options available to moderators is to leave the",
"against one of the comments, which has brought it to my attention. It",
"may be the basis of a useful chat/meta discussion, unfortunately the only options",
"that all the comments form a discussion that is not relevant to the",
"some of our recent discussions on meta, it seems the community is particularly",
"to moderator behaviour. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle) has a \"not constructive\" flag raised against one",
"question, but may be the basis of a useful chat/meta discussion, unfortunately the",
"is not relevant to the question, but may be the basis of a",
"to me that all the comments form a discussion that is not relevant",
"[This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle) has a \"not constructive\" flag raised against one of the comments,",
"but may be the basis of a useful chat/meta discussion, unfortunately the only",
"comments form a discussion that is not relevant to the question, but may",
"of the comments, which has brought it to my attention. It seems to",
"a \"not constructive\" flag raised against one of the comments, which has brought",
"that is not relevant to the question, but may be the basis of",
"discussion that is not relevant to the question, but may be the basis",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle) has a \"not constructive\" flag raised against one of the comments, which",
"discussion, unfortunately the only options available to moderators is to leave the comments",
"of our recent discussions on meta, it seems the community is particularly sensitive",
"has brought it to my attention. It seems to me that all the",
"are related to moderator behaviour. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle) has a \"not constructive\" flag raised",
"my attention. It seems to me that all the comments form a discussion",
"discussions on meta, it seems the community is particularly sensitive to moderator deleting",
"the comments, which has brought it to my attention. It seems to me",
"comments, which has brought it to my attention. It seems to me that",
"that are related to moderator behaviour. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle) has a \"not constructive\" flag",
"available to moderators is to leave the comments or delete the comments. Should",
"the comments form a discussion that is not relevant to the question, but",
"\"not constructive\" flag raised against one of the comments, which has brought it",
"behaviour. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle) has a \"not constructive\" flag raised against one of the",
"constructive\" flag raised against one of the comments, which has brought it to",
"our recent discussions on meta, it seems the community is particularly sensitive to",
"Given some of our recent discussions on meta, it seems the community is",
"moderator behaviour. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle) has a \"not constructive\" flag raised against one of",
"it to my attention. It seems to me that all the comments form",
"attention. It seems to me that all the comments form a discussion that",
"it seems the community is particularly sensitive to moderator deleting comments that are",
"moderator deleting comments that are related to moderator behaviour. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7774/how-do-academics-reconcile-simultaneously-collaborating-and-competing-with-colle) has a",
"It seems to me that all the comments form a discussion that is",
"be the basis of a useful chat/meta discussion, unfortunately the only options available",
"one of the comments, which has brought it to my attention. It seems",
"has a \"not constructive\" flag raised against one of the comments, which has",
"raised against one of the comments, which has brought it to my attention.",
"the community is particularly sensitive to moderator deleting comments that are related to",
"which has brought it to my attention. It seems to me that all",
"the only options available to moderators is to leave the comments or delete",
"seems to me that all the comments form a discussion that is not",
"flag raised against one of the comments, which has brought it to my",
"form a discussion that is not relevant to the question, but may be",
"me that all the comments form a discussion that is not relevant to",
"to leave the comments or delete the comments. Should the comments be deleted?",
"is particularly sensitive to moderator deleting comments that are related to moderator behaviour.",
"relevant to the question, but may be the basis of a useful chat/meta",
"to the question, but may be the basis of a useful chat/meta discussion,"
] |
[
"to be both at once, or to be different things to different users,",
"as easy as possible for others to get/find accurate, focused answers to questions",
"is an example of the former, and [MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/) is an example of the",
"OP but are not really answers to the question should be downvoted, converted",
"library of concise, clear and correct questions and answers as an archive for",
"general idea of \"What should Academia.SE be?\" whether they relate to these themes",
"recent past. I am looking for answers that address the general idea of",
"\"Choose #1 or #2 proposal.\" This was intended to be a prompt for",
"proposal.\" This was intended to be a prompt for discussion about *what the",
"of these approaches is especially bad - but trying to be both at",
"It is confusing to new users, since the site policies are so inconsistent",
"be removed (once they no longer serve a useful purpose). To the second",
"should preserved (except for offensive comments). * **Answers:** On the first Academia.SE, answers",
"This was intended to be a prompt for discussion about *what the current",
"a bad way, not in a healthy way). We have grown [quite a",
"As a moderator, it makes it difficult to act on the community's wishes",
"not intended to be a \"Choose #1 or #2 proposal.\" This was intended",
"future Google users. We want to make it as easy as possible for",
"want to go in whatever direction we choose? What goals are most important",
"to these themes or not. Recently, we've had several disagreements on meta that",
"2. **We are facilitating \"on-the-record\" problem-solving between academics/researchers with questions and academics/researchers with",
"it, it should stay open/be reopened if it's closed. * **Comments:** To the",
"in acting on flags)? It is confusing to new users, since the site",
"What goals are most important to us, as a community? --- Note: this",
"explicitly signal that edits are welcome. * **Closing questions:** On the first Academia.SE,",
"of a thread is to help the people who participated in it, with",
"and should be treated as such. I don't think either of these approaches",
"the intent of the OP. The second Academia.SE has a hands-off approach to",
"that no longer add any value to the author of a post or",
"this site is to help both those asking questions *and* future Google users.",
"graduated!) in the last year, and I think it's well past time to",
"mostly to connect users with questions to other users who want to answer",
"the OP but are not really answers to the question should be downvoted,",
"a hands-off approach to other people's content, in which edits are discouraged unless",
"serve a useful purpose). To the second Academia.SE, comments are a part of",
"Google users. We want to make it as easy as possible for others",
"resources (I think [Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/) is an example of the former, and [MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/)",
"community wants from this site.* #1 and #2 are just things I've heard",
"this site is mostly to connect users with questions to other users who",
"**Closing questions:** On the first Academia.SE, questions that are outside the scope of",
"and correct questions and answers as an archive for interested readers.** The main",
"a post is made CW to explicitly signal that edits are welcome. *",
"preserving the intent of the OP. The second Academia.SE has a hands-off approach",
"closed and/or edited to fit the scope of the site. On the second",
"for others to get/find accurate, focused answers to questions and problems that are",
"those questions. The main purpose of a thread is to help the people",
"to answer it, it should stay open/be reopened if it's closed. * **Comments:**",
"The goal of this site is mostly to connect users with questions to",
"site is to help both those asking questions *and* future Google users. We",
"as an archive for interested readers.** The main goal of this site is",
"is to help both those asking questions *and* future Google users. We want",
"a specific scenario or a specific site policy. This is a general question",
"the OP. The second Academia.SE has a hands-off approach to other people's content,",
"trying to be both at once, or to be different things to different",
"address the general idea of \"What should Academia.SE be?\" whether they relate to",
"or #2 proposal.\" This was intended to be a prompt for discussion about",
"want to answer those questions. The main purpose of a thread is to",
"are facilitating \"on-the-record\" problem-solving between academics/researchers with questions and academics/researchers with answers.** The",
"Academia.SE, comments that no longer add any value to the author of a",
"defined on meta) are \"noise\" and should be closed and/or edited to fit",
"are distracting, and should be removed (once they no longer serve a useful",
"are most important to us, as a community? --- Note: this is not",
"I follow in acting on flags)? It is confusing to new users, since",
"the current community wants from this site.* #1 and #2 are just things",
"for interested readers.** The main goal of this site is to help both",
"revisit what this community is and what *primary* role it serves. Do we",
"meta) are \"noise\" and should be closed and/or edited to fit the scope",
"on meta that I think stem from slightly conflicting views of what this",
"future viewers. Both of the sites I've just described can be extremely useful",
"This was not intended to be a \"Choose #1 or #2 proposal.\" This",
"moderator, it makes it difficult to act on the community's wishes (which part",
"question is broadly relevant to academia and *someone* is willing to answer it,",
"these themes or not. Recently, we've had several disagreements on meta that I",
"different users, is (I think) not healthy. As a moderator, it makes it",
"are welcome. * **Closing questions:** On the first Academia.SE, questions that are outside",
"goal of this site is to help both those asking questions *and* future",
"from slightly conflicting views of what this community is (or should be). Broadly,",
"and valuable resources (I think [Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/) is an example of the former,",
"a thread is to help the people who participated in it, with the",
"treated as such. I don't think either of these approaches is especially bad",
"we want to go in whatever direction we choose? What goals are most",
"be closed and/or edited to fit the scope of the site. On the",
"comments). * **Answers:** On the first Academia.SE, answers that might be useful to",
"**We are facilitating \"on-the-record\" problem-solving between academics/researchers with questions and academics/researchers with answers.**",
"are a part of the historical record of the communication, and should preserved",
"has a hands-off approach to other people's content, in which edits are discouraged",
"while still preserving the intent of the OP. The second Academia.SE has a",
"easy as possible for others to get/find accurate, focused answers to questions and",
"of participants *and* future viewers. Both of the sites I've just described can",
"think [Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/) is an example of the former, and [MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/) is an",
"of a post or to future readers are distracting, and should be removed",
"(once they no longer serve a useful purpose). To the second Academia.SE, comments",
"between academics/researchers with questions and academics/researchers with answers.** The goal of this site",
"this site.* #1 and #2 are just things I've heard from users in",
"both those asking questions *and* future Google users. We want to make it",
"to the question should be downvoted, converted to comment, or deleted, so as",
"aren't really answers are useful content, and should be treated as such. I",
"offensive comments). * **Answers:** On the first Academia.SE, answers that might be useful",
"clear and correct questions and answers as an archive for interested readers.** The",
"example of the latter), but trying to be both at once causes some",
"a useful purpose). To the second Academia.SE, comments are a part of the",
"To the first Academia.SE, comments that no longer add any value to the",
"idea of \"What should Academia.SE be?\" whether they relate to these themes or",
"Do we want to tend more towards Academia.SE #1 or Academia.SE #2? How",
"intended to be a \"Choose #1 or #2 proposal.\" This was intended to",
"an example of the latter), but trying to be both at once causes",
"that are outside the scope of the site (as defined on meta) are",
"and problems that are within the scope of this site. 2. **We are",
"the sites I've just described can be extremely useful and valuable resources (I",
"**Comments:** To the first Academia.SE, comments that no longer add any value to",
"might be useful to the OP but are not really answers to the",
"the scope of this site. 2. **We are facilitating \"on-the-record\" problem-solving between academics/researchers",
"answers that aren't really answers are useful content, and should be treated as",
"site is mostly to connect users with questions to other users who want",
"approaches is especially bad - but trying to be both at once, or",
"a question about a specific scenario or a specific site policy. This is",
"broadly relevant to academia and *someone* is willing to answer it, it should",
"be downvoted, converted to comment, or deleted, so as not to distract from",
"whether they relate to these themes or not. Recently, we've had several disagreements",
"are \"noise\" and should be closed and/or edited to fit the scope of",
"answers are useful content, and should be treated as such. I don't think",
"titles, removing \"noise\" (\"sorry for the dumb question,\" extended thanks, over-lengthy and irrelevant",
"pleas of desperation) while still preserving the intent of the OP. The second",
"intended to be a prompt for discussion about *what the current community wants",
"conflicting views of what this community is (or should be). Broadly, these are:",
"the dumb question,\" extended thanks, over-lengthy and irrelevant personal information, and pleas of",
"get/find accurate, focused answers to questions and problems that are within the scope",
"so inconsistent (both in action, and as expressed on meta). And I think",
"the first Academia.SE, comments that no longer add any value to the author",
"meta that I think stem from slightly conflicting views of what this community",
"with questions and academics/researchers with answers.** The goal of this site is mostly",
"for the benefit of participants *and* future viewers. Both of the sites I've",
"#1 or #2 proposal.\" This was intended to be a prompt for discussion",
"users. We want to make it as easy as possible for others to",
"users with questions to other users who want to answer those questions. The",
"correct questions and answers as an archive for interested readers.** The main goal",
"it should stay open/be reopened if it's closed. * **Comments:** To the first",
"academics/researchers with answers.** The goal of this site is mostly to connect users",
"information, and pleas of desperation) while still preserving the intent of the OP.",
"think either of these approaches is especially bad - but trying to be",
"think stem from slightly conflicting views of what this community is (or should",
"of the communication, and should preserved (except for offensive comments). * **Answers:** On",
"is confusing to new users, since the site policies are so inconsistent (both",
"(I think) not healthy. As a moderator, it makes it difficult to act",
"bad way, not in a healthy way). We have grown [quite a lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph)",
"grown [quite a lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph) (and graduated!) in the last year, and I think",
"community is (or should be). Broadly, these are: 1. **We are building up",
"site policy. This is a general question about the future direction of the",
"are: 1. **We are building up a library of concise, clear and correct",
"who want to answer those questions. The main purpose of a thread is",
"(both in action, and as expressed on meta). And I think it leads",
"of concise, clear and correct questions and answers as an archive for interested",
"example, * **Editing**: The first Academia.SE encourages editing - improving question titles, removing",
"not to distract from \"real\" answers. On the second Academia.SE, answers that aren't",
"the benefit of participants *and* future viewers. Both of the sites I've just",
"part of the historical record of the communication, and should preserved (except for",
"this community is and what *primary* role it serves. Do we want to",
"or Academia.SE #2? How far do we want to go in whatever direction",
"it as easy as possible for others to get/find accurate, focused answers to",
"follow in acting on flags)? It is confusing to new users, since the",
"the site. On the second Academia.SE, if a question is broadly relevant to",
"welcome. * **Closing questions:** On the first Academia.SE, questions that are outside the",
"On the first Academia.SE, answers that might be useful to the OP but",
"OP. The second Academia.SE has a hands-off approach to other people's content, in",
"[Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/) is an example of the former, and [MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/) is an example",
"important to us, as a community? --- Note: this is not a question",
"thread preserved for the benefit of participants *and* future viewers. Both of the",
"in which edits are discouraged unless a post is made CW to explicitly",
"be treated as such. I don't think either of these approaches is especially",
"to future readers are distracting, and should be removed (once they no longer",
"policies are so inconsistent (both in action, and as expressed on meta). And",
"(in a bad way, not in a healthy way). We have grown [quite",
"and irrelevant personal information, and pleas of desperation) while still preserving the intent",
"once, or to be different things to different users, is (I think) not",
"help both those asking questions *and* future Google users. We want to make",
"on meta). And I think it leads to conflict between users (in a",
"the former, and [MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/) is an example of the latter), but trying to",
"be useful to the OP but are not really answers to the question",
"this is not a question about a specific scenario or a specific site",
"people who participated in it, with the entire thread preserved for the benefit",
"role it serves. Do we want to tend more towards Academia.SE #1 or",
"answers. On the second Academia.SE, answers that aren't really answers are useful content,",
"question,\" extended thanks, over-lengthy and irrelevant personal information, and pleas of desperation) while",
"On the first Academia.SE, questions that are outside the scope of the site",
"from this site.* #1 and #2 are just things I've heard from users",
"answers that address the general idea of \"What should Academia.SE be?\" whether they",
"from users in the recent past. I am looking for answers that address",
"question titles, removing \"noise\" (\"sorry for the dumb question,\" extended thanks, over-lengthy and",
"distract from \"real\" answers. On the second Academia.SE, answers that aren't really answers",
"in the last year, and I think it's well past time to revisit",
"want to make it as easy as possible for others to get/find accurate,",
"archive for interested readers.** The main goal of this site is to help",
"users (in a bad way, not in a healthy way). We have grown",
"*primary* role it serves. Do we want to tend more towards Academia.SE #1",
"answers to the question should be downvoted, converted to comment, or deleted, so",
"are building up a library of concise, clear and correct questions and answers",
"*and* future Google users. We want to make it as easy as possible",
"answers.** The goal of this site is mostly to connect users with questions",
"have grown [quite a lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph) (and graduated!) in the last year, and I",
"last year, and I think it's well past time to revisit what this",
"a post or to future readers are distracting, and should be removed (once",
"are useful content, and should be treated as such. I don't think either",
"converted to comment, or deleted, so as not to distract from \"real\" answers.",
"of the OP. The second Academia.SE has a hands-off approach to other people's",
"be a \"Choose #1 or #2 proposal.\" This was intended to be a",
"acting on flags)? It is confusing to new users, since the site policies",
"removed (once they no longer serve a useful purpose). To the second Academia.SE,",
"questions and problems that are within the scope of this site. 2. **We",
"preserved (except for offensive comments). * **Answers:** On the first Academia.SE, answers that",
"in the recent past. I am looking for answers that address the general",
"be extremely useful and valuable resources (I think [Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/) is an example",
"specific scenario or a specific site policy. This is a general question about",
"want to tend more towards Academia.SE #1 or Academia.SE #2? How far do",
"content, in which edits are discouraged unless a post is made CW to",
"a moderator, it makes it difficult to act on the community's wishes (which",
"are outside the scope of the site (as defined on meta) are \"noise\"",
"community's wishes (which part of the community should I follow in acting on",
"both at once causes some friction. For example, * **Editing**: The first Academia.SE",
"I've heard from users in the recent past. I am looking for answers",
"former, and [MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/) is an example of the latter), but trying to be",
"Academia.SE, comments are a part of the historical record of the communication, and",
"the scope of the site. On the second Academia.SE, if a question is",
"The second Academia.SE has a hands-off approach to other people's content, in which",
"signal that edits are welcome. * **Closing questions:** On the first Academia.SE, questions",
"building up a library of concise, clear and correct questions and answers as",
"themes or not. Recently, we've had several disagreements on meta that I think",
"main purpose of a thread is to help the people who participated in",
"is (I think) not healthy. As a moderator, it makes it difficult to",
"downvoted, converted to comment, or deleted, so as not to distract from \"real\"",
"We have grown [quite a lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph) (and graduated!) in the last year, and",
"Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/) is an example of the former, and [MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/) is an example of",
"it leads to conflict between users (in a bad way, not in a",
"the historical record of the communication, and should preserved (except for offensive comments).",
"content, and should be treated as such. I don't think either of these",
"should be closed and/or edited to fit the scope of the site. On",
"is broadly relevant to academia and *someone* is willing to answer it, it",
"edited to fit the scope of the site. On the second Academia.SE, if",
"distracting, and should be removed (once they no longer serve a useful purpose).",
"should be removed (once they no longer serve a useful purpose). To the",
"of this site. 2. **We are facilitating \"on-the-record\" problem-solving between academics/researchers with questions",
"are discouraged unless a post is made CW to explicitly signal that edits",
"edits are discouraged unless a post is made CW to explicitly signal that",
"to answer those questions. The main purpose of a thread is to help",
"and should be closed and/or edited to fit the scope of the site.",
"at once causes some friction. For example, * **Editing**: The first Academia.SE encourages",
"second Academia.SE, if a question is broadly relevant to academia and *someone* is",
"any value to the author of a post or to future readers are",
"different things to different users, is (I think) not healthy. As a moderator,",
"I think it leads to conflict between users (in a bad way, not",
"For example, * **Editing**: The first Academia.SE encourages editing - improving question titles,",
"whatever direction we choose? What goals are most important to us, as a",
"I am looking for answers that address the general idea of \"What should",
"more towards Academia.SE #1 or Academia.SE #2? How far do we want to",
"and what *primary* role it serves. Do we want to tend more towards",
"* **Answers:** On the first Academia.SE, answers that might be useful to the",
"Academia.SE, answers that might be useful to the OP but are not really",
"to other users who want to answer those questions. The main purpose of",
"interested readers.** The main goal of this site is to help both those",
"\"on-the-record\" problem-solving between academics/researchers with questions and academics/researchers with answers.** The goal of",
"dumb question,\" extended thanks, over-lengthy and irrelevant personal information, and pleas of desperation)",
"comments that no longer add any value to the author of a post",
"extremely useful and valuable resources (I think [Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/) is an example of",
"problem-solving between academics/researchers with questions and academics/researchers with answers.** The goal of this",
"\"real\" answers. On the second Academia.SE, answers that aren't really answers are useful",
"(except for offensive comments). * **Answers:** On the first Academia.SE, answers that might",
"direction we choose? What goals are most important to us, as a community?",
"serves. Do we want to tend more towards Academia.SE #1 or Academia.SE #2?",
"(and graduated!) in the last year, and I think it's well past time",
"is especially bad - but trying to be both at once, or to",
"comments are a part of the historical record of the communication, and should",
"if it's closed. * **Comments:** To the first Academia.SE, comments that no longer",
"first Academia.SE, questions that are outside the scope of the site (as defined",
"in it, with the entire thread preserved for the benefit of participants *and*",
"encourages editing - improving question titles, removing \"noise\" (\"sorry for the dumb question,\"",
"of the historical record of the communication, and should preserved (except for offensive",
"goal of this site is mostly to connect users with questions to other",
"other users who want to answer those questions. The main purpose of a",
"that I think stem from slightly conflicting views of what this community is",
"especially bad - but trying to be both at once, or to be",
"answer it, it should stay open/be reopened if it's closed. * **Comments:** To",
"to us, as a community? --- Note: this is not a question about",
"I've just described can be extremely useful and valuable resources (I think [Cross",
"to new users, since the site policies are so inconsistent (both in action,",
"connect users with questions to other users who want to answer those questions.",
"communication, and should preserved (except for offensive comments). * **Answers:** On the first",
"#1 or Academia.SE #2? How far do we want to go in whatever",
"a \"Choose #1 or #2 proposal.\" This was intended to be a prompt",
"think) not healthy. As a moderator, it makes it difficult to act on",
"a lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph) (and graduated!) in the last year, and I think it's well",
"to help the people who participated in it, with the entire thread preserved",
"readers are distracting, and should be removed (once they no longer serve a",
"current community wants from this site.* #1 and #2 are just things I've",
"such. I don't think either of these approaches is especially bad - but",
"site. 2. **We are facilitating \"on-the-record\" problem-solving between academics/researchers with questions and academics/researchers",
"not. Recently, we've had several disagreements on meta that I think stem from",
"stay open/be reopened if it's closed. * **Comments:** To the first Academia.SE, comments",
"and I think it's well past time to revisit what this community is",
"record of the communication, and should preserved (except for offensive comments). * **Answers:**",
"be a prompt for discussion about *what the current community wants from this",
"On the second Academia.SE, if a question is broadly relevant to academia and",
"the entire thread preserved for the benefit of participants *and* future viewers. Both",
"community? --- Note: this is not a question about a specific scenario or",
"should be). Broadly, these are: 1. **We are building up a library of",
"just described can be extremely useful and valuable resources (I think [Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/)",
"--- Note: this is not a question about a specific scenario or a",
"site (as defined on meta) are \"noise\" and should be closed and/or edited",
"don't think either of these approaches is especially bad - but trying to",
"of desperation) while still preserving the intent of the OP. The second Academia.SE",
"slightly conflicting views of what this community is (or should be). Broadly, these",
"to act on the community's wishes (which part of the community should I",
"to other people's content, in which edits are discouraged unless a post is",
"new users, since the site policies are so inconsistent (both in action, and",
"inconsistent (both in action, and as expressed on meta). And I think it",
"on meta) are \"noise\" and should be closed and/or edited to fit the",
"of the sites I've just described can be extremely useful and valuable resources",
"#2? How far do we want to go in whatever direction we choose?",
"views of what this community is (or should be). Broadly, these are: 1.",
"academics/researchers with questions and academics/researchers with answers.** The goal of this site is",
"scenario or a specific site policy. This is a general question about the",
"(which part of the community should I follow in acting on flags)? It",
"to the author of a post or to future readers are distracting, and",
"meta). And I think it leads to conflict between users (in a bad",
"is (or should be). Broadly, these are: 1. **We are building up a",
"can be extremely useful and valuable resources (I think [Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/) is an",
"this community is (or should be). Broadly, these are: 1. **We are building",
"is willing to answer it, it should stay open/be reopened if it's closed.",
"This is a general question about the future direction of the site, please",
"example of the former, and [MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/) is an example of the latter), but",
"The main purpose of a thread is to help the people who participated",
"(\"sorry for the dumb question,\" extended thanks, over-lengthy and irrelevant personal information, and",
"a general question about the future direction of the site, please answer accordingly.",
"not healthy. As a moderator, it makes it difficult to act on the",
"with questions to other users who want to answer those questions. The main",
"#1 and #2 are just things I've heard from users in the recent",
"or deleted, so as not to distract from \"real\" answers. On the second",
"other people's content, in which edits are discouraged unless a post is made",
"for answers that address the general idea of \"What should Academia.SE be?\" whether",
"with answers.** The goal of this site is mostly to connect users with",
"it, with the entire thread preserved for the benefit of participants *and* future",
"past. I am looking for answers that address the general idea of \"What",
"*someone* is willing to answer it, it should stay open/be reopened if it's",
"longer add any value to the author of a post or to future",
"to questions and problems that are within the scope of this site. 2.",
"described can be extremely useful and valuable resources (I think [Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/) is",
"as a community? --- Note: this is not a question about a specific",
"goals are most important to us, as a community? --- Note: this is",
"relate to these themes or not. Recently, we've had several disagreements on meta",
"of the site. On the second Academia.SE, if a question is broadly relevant",
"to be a \"Choose #1 or #2 proposal.\" This was intended to be",
"problems that are within the scope of this site. 2. **We are facilitating",
"and [MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/) is an example of the latter), but trying to be both",
"far do we want to go in whatever direction we choose? What goals",
"way). We have grown [quite a lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph) (and graduated!) in the last year,",
"of \"What should Academia.SE be?\" whether they relate to these themes or not.",
"action, and as expressed on meta). And I think it leads to conflict",
"but trying to be both at once, or to be different things to",
"a specific site policy. This is a general question about the future direction",
"Academia.SE #2? How far do we want to go in whatever direction we",
"of the site (as defined on meta) are \"noise\" and should be closed",
"choose? What goals are most important to us, as a community? --- Note:",
"site. On the second Academia.SE, if a question is broadly relevant to academia",
"I don't think either of these approaches is especially bad - but trying",
"act on the community's wishes (which part of the community should I follow",
"removing \"noise\" (\"sorry for the dumb question,\" extended thanks, over-lengthy and irrelevant personal",
"(or should be). Broadly, these are: 1. **We are building up a library",
"hands-off approach to other people's content, in which edits are discouraged unless a",
"to different users, is (I think) not healthy. As a moderator, it makes",
"from \"real\" answers. On the second Academia.SE, answers that aren't really answers are",
"questions. The main purpose of a thread is to help the people who",
"once causes some friction. For example, * **Editing**: The first Academia.SE encourages editing",
"We want to make it as easy as possible for others to get/find",
"the scope of the site (as defined on meta) are \"noise\" and should",
"relevant to academia and *someone* is willing to answer it, it should stay",
"causes some friction. For example, * **Editing**: The first Academia.SE encourages editing -",
"irrelevant personal information, and pleas of desperation) while still preserving the intent of",
"the second Academia.SE, comments are a part of the historical record of the",
"to explicitly signal that edits are welcome. * **Closing questions:** On the first",
"first Academia.SE, answers that might be useful to the OP but are not",
"as expressed on meta). And I think it leads to conflict between users",
"the people who participated in it, with the entire thread preserved for the",
"go in whatever direction we choose? What goals are most important to us,",
"concise, clear and correct questions and answers as an archive for interested readers.**",
"first Academia.SE, comments that no longer add any value to the author of",
"second Academia.SE, answers that aren't really answers are useful content, and should be",
"the site policies are so inconsistent (both in action, and as expressed on",
"latter), but trying to be both at once causes some friction. For example,",
"but trying to be both at once causes some friction. For example, *",
"really answers to the question should be downvoted, converted to comment, or deleted,",
"open/be reopened if it's closed. * **Comments:** To the first Academia.SE, comments that",
"to distract from \"real\" answers. On the second Academia.SE, answers that aren't really",
"to connect users with questions to other users who want to answer those",
"heard from users in the recent past. I am looking for answers that",
"or a specific site policy. This is a general question about the future",
"in whatever direction we choose? What goals are most important to us, as",
"useful purpose). To the second Academia.SE, comments are a part of the historical",
"outside the scope of the site (as defined on meta) are \"noise\" and",
"be?\" whether they relate to these themes or not. Recently, we've had several",
"and pleas of desperation) while still preserving the intent of the OP. The",
"on the community's wishes (which part of the community should I follow in",
"Both of the sites I've just described can be extremely useful and valuable",
"main goal of this site is to help both those asking questions *and*",
"confusing to new users, since the site policies are so inconsistent (both in",
"as possible for others to get/find accurate, focused answers to questions and problems",
"of what this community is (or should be). Broadly, these are: 1. **We",
"answers to questions and problems that are within the scope of this site.",
"towards Academia.SE #1 or Academia.SE #2? How far do we want to go",
"conflict between users (in a bad way, not in a healthy way). We",
"users in the recent past. I am looking for answers that address the",
"the question should be downvoted, converted to comment, or deleted, so as not",
"Broadly, these are: 1. **We are building up a library of concise, clear",
"community should I follow in acting on flags)? It is confusing to new",
"and academics/researchers with answers.** The goal of this site is mostly to connect",
"**Edit**: This was not intended to be a \"Choose #1 or #2 proposal.\"",
"deleted, so as not to distract from \"real\" answers. On the second Academia.SE,",
"future readers are distracting, and should be removed (once they no longer serve",
"specific site policy. This is a general question about the future direction of",
"way, not in a healthy way). We have grown [quite a lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph) (and",
"possible for others to get/find accurate, focused answers to questions and problems that",
"lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph) (and graduated!) in the last year, and I think it's well past",
"How far do we want to go in whatever direction we choose? What",
"those asking questions *and* future Google users. We want to make it as",
"desperation) while still preserving the intent of the OP. The second Academia.SE has",
"that might be useful to the OP but are not really answers to",
"it makes it difficult to act on the community's wishes (which part of",
"the general idea of \"What should Academia.SE be?\" whether they relate to these",
"are so inconsistent (both in action, and as expressed on meta). And I",
"and *someone* is willing to answer it, it should stay open/be reopened if",
"that are within the scope of this site. 2. **We are facilitating \"on-the-record\"",
"it's closed. * **Comments:** To the first Academia.SE, comments that no longer add",
"question about a specific scenario or a specific site policy. This is a",
"**We are building up a library of concise, clear and correct questions and",
"to go in whatever direction we choose? What goals are most important to",
"past time to revisit what this community is and what *primary* role it",
"disagreements on meta that I think stem from slightly conflicting views of what",
"author of a post or to future readers are distracting, and should be",
"not a question about a specific scenario or a specific site policy. This",
"to be different things to different users, is (I think) not healthy. As",
"questions:** On the first Academia.SE, questions that are outside the scope of the",
"purpose of a thread is to help the people who participated in it,",
"editing - improving question titles, removing \"noise\" (\"sorry for the dumb question,\" extended",
"things to different users, is (I think) not healthy. As a moderator, it",
"be). Broadly, these are: 1. **We are building up a library of concise,",
"these are: 1. **We are building up a library of concise, clear and",
"should stay open/be reopened if it's closed. * **Comments:** To the first Academia.SE,",
"difficult to act on the community's wishes (which part of the community should",
"should be treated as such. I don't think either of these approaches is",
"#2 proposal.\" This was intended to be a prompt for discussion about *what",
"1. **We are building up a library of concise, clear and correct questions",
"and as expressed on meta). And I think it leads to conflict between",
"*and* future viewers. Both of the sites I've just described can be extremely",
"is mostly to connect users with questions to other users who want to",
"a question is broadly relevant to academia and *someone* is willing to answer",
"or not. Recently, we've had several disagreements on meta that I think stem",
"should be downvoted, converted to comment, or deleted, so as not to distract",
"but are not really answers to the question should be downvoted, converted to",
"edits are welcome. * **Closing questions:** On the first Academia.SE, questions that are",
"**Answers:** On the first Academia.SE, answers that might be useful to the OP",
"tend more towards Academia.SE #1 or Academia.SE #2? How far do we want",
"post is made CW to explicitly signal that edits are welcome. * **Closing",
"they relate to these themes or not. Recently, we've had several disagreements on",
"with the entire thread preserved for the benefit of participants *and* future viewers.",
"what this community is (or should be). Broadly, these are: 1. **We are",
"just things I've heard from users in the recent past. I am looking",
"historical record of the communication, and should preserved (except for offensive comments). *",
"not really answers to the question should be downvoted, converted to comment, or",
"questions to other users who want to answer those questions. The main purpose",
"discouraged unless a post is made CW to explicitly signal that edits are",
"purpose). To the second Academia.SE, comments are a part of the historical record",
"up a library of concise, clear and correct questions and answers as an",
"to conflict between users (in a bad way, not in a healthy way).",
"thanks, over-lengthy and irrelevant personal information, and pleas of desperation) while still preserving",
"not in a healthy way). We have grown [quite a lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph) (and graduated!)",
"community is and what *primary* role it serves. Do we want to tend",
"useful content, and should be treated as such. I don't think either of",
"the author of a post or to future readers are distracting, and should",
"had several disagreements on meta that I think stem from slightly conflicting views",
"was intended to be a prompt for discussion about *what the current community",
"is to help the people who participated in it, with the entire thread",
"prompt for discussion about *what the current community wants from this site.* #1",
"To the second Academia.SE, comments are a part of the historical record of",
"that aren't really answers are useful content, and should be treated as such.",
"either of these approaches is especially bad - but trying to be both",
"is and what *primary* role it serves. Do we want to tend more",
"[quite a lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph) (and graduated!) in the last year, and I think it's",
"the site (as defined on meta) are \"noise\" and should be closed and/or",
"is a general question about the future direction of the site, please answer",
"to the OP but are not really answers to the question should be",
"Recently, we've had several disagreements on meta that I think stem from slightly",
"over-lengthy and irrelevant personal information, and pleas of desperation) while still preserving the",
"approach to other people's content, in which edits are discouraged unless a post",
"the communication, and should preserved (except for offensive comments). * **Answers:** On the",
"scope of the site (as defined on meta) are \"noise\" and should be",
"bad - but trying to be both at once, or to be different",
"of this site is to help both those asking questions *and* future Google",
"- improving question titles, removing \"noise\" (\"sorry for the dumb question,\" extended thanks,",
"the first Academia.SE, questions that are outside the scope of the site (as",
"unless a post is made CW to explicitly signal that edits are welcome.",
"policy. This is a general question about the future direction of the site,",
"#2 are just things I've heard from users in the recent past. I",
"things I've heard from users in the recent past. I am looking for",
"the recent past. I am looking for answers that address the general idea",
"viewers. Both of the sites I've just described can be extremely useful and",
"it's well past time to revisit what this community is and what *primary*",
"first Academia.SE encourages editing - improving question titles, removing \"noise\" (\"sorry for the",
"should Academia.SE be?\" whether they relate to these themes or not. Recently, we've",
"accurate, focused answers to questions and problems that are within the scope of",
"a prompt for discussion about *what the current community wants from this site.*",
"so as not to distract from \"real\" answers. On the second Academia.SE, answers",
"within the scope of this site. 2. **We are facilitating \"on-the-record\" problem-solving between",
"second Academia.SE has a hands-off approach to other people's content, in which edits",
"entire thread preserved for the benefit of participants *and* future viewers. Both of",
"makes it difficult to act on the community's wishes (which part of the",
"\"noise\" (\"sorry for the dumb question,\" extended thanks, over-lengthy and irrelevant personal information,",
"stem from slightly conflicting views of what this community is (or should be).",
"and should be removed (once they no longer serve a useful purpose). To",
"us, as a community? --- Note: this is not a question about a",
"for discussion about *what the current community wants from this site.* #1 and",
"some friction. For example, * **Editing**: The first Academia.SE encourages editing - improving",
"healthy. As a moderator, it makes it difficult to act on the community's",
"users, is (I think) not healthy. As a moderator, it makes it difficult",
"wants from this site.* #1 and #2 are just things I've heard from",
"or to future readers are distracting, and should be removed (once they no",
"people's content, in which edits are discouraged unless a post is made CW",
"closed. * **Comments:** To the first Academia.SE, comments that no longer add any",
"these approaches is especially bad - but trying to be both at once,",
"in action, and as expressed on meta). And I think it leads to",
"longer serve a useful purpose). To the second Academia.SE, comments are a part",
"trying to be both at once causes some friction. For example, * **Editing**:",
"Academia.SE, questions that are outside the scope of the site (as defined on",
"questions *and* future Google users. We want to make it as easy as",
"this site. 2. **We are facilitating \"on-the-record\" problem-solving between academics/researchers with questions and",
"questions and academics/researchers with answers.** The goal of this site is mostly to",
"asking questions *and* future Google users. We want to make it as easy",
"questions that are outside the scope of the site (as defined on meta)",
"as such. I don't think either of these approaches is especially bad -",
"at once, or to be different things to different users, is (I think)",
"a healthy way). We have grown [quite a lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph) (and graduated!) in the",
"do we want to go in whatever direction we choose? What goals are",
"preserved for the benefit of participants *and* future viewers. Both of the sites",
"they no longer serve a useful purpose). To the second Academia.SE, comments are",
"the first Academia.SE, answers that might be useful to the OP but are",
"if a question is broadly relevant to academia and *someone* is willing to",
"about a specific scenario or a specific site policy. This is a general",
"help the people who participated in it, with the entire thread preserved for",
"comment, or deleted, so as not to distract from \"real\" answers. On the",
"we choose? What goals are most important to us, as a community? ---",
"it difficult to act on the community's wishes (which part of the community",
"answer those questions. The main purpose of a thread is to help the",
"*what the current community wants from this site.* #1 and #2 are just",
"participants *and* future viewers. Both of the sites I've just described can be",
"since the site policies are so inconsistent (both in action, and as expressed",
"of the former, and [MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/) is an example of the latter), but trying",
"to be both at once causes some friction. For example, * **Editing**: The",
"Academia.SE, answers that aren't really answers are useful content, and should be treated",
"are not really answers to the question should be downvoted, converted to comment,",
"useful to the OP but are not really answers to the question should",
"really answers are useful content, and should be treated as such. I don't",
"value to the author of a post or to future readers are distracting,",
"answers that might be useful to the OP but are not really answers",
"both at once, or to be different things to different users, is (I",
"willing to answer it, it should stay open/be reopened if it's closed. *",
"On the second Academia.SE, answers that aren't really answers are useful content, and",
"of the community should I follow in acting on flags)? It is confusing",
"time to revisit what this community is and what *primary* role it serves.",
"think it leads to conflict between users (in a bad way, not in",
"valuable resources (I think [Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/) is an example of the former, and",
"and #2 are just things I've heard from users in the recent past.",
"Academia.SE be?\" whether they relate to these themes or not. Recently, we've had",
"sites I've just described can be extremely useful and valuable resources (I think",
"what this community is and what *primary* role it serves. Do we want",
"an archive for interested readers.** The main goal of this site is to",
"users, since the site policies are so inconsistent (both in action, and as",
"to be a prompt for discussion about *what the current community wants from",
"in a healthy way). We have grown [quite a lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph) (and graduated!) in",
"\"noise\" and should be closed and/or edited to fit the scope of the",
"and should preserved (except for offensive comments). * **Answers:** On the first Academia.SE,",
"Academia.SE encourages editing - improving question titles, removing \"noise\" (\"sorry for the dumb",
"the latter), but trying to be both at once causes some friction. For",
"scope of this site. 2. **We are facilitating \"on-the-record\" problem-solving between academics/researchers with",
"question should be downvoted, converted to comment, or deleted, so as not to",
"facilitating \"on-the-record\" problem-solving between academics/researchers with questions and academics/researchers with answers.** The goal",
"benefit of participants *and* future viewers. Both of the sites I've just described",
"what *primary* role it serves. Do we want to tend more towards Academia.SE",
"we want to tend more towards Academia.SE #1 or Academia.SE #2? How far",
"most important to us, as a community? --- Note: this is not a",
"part of the community should I follow in acting on flags)? It is",
"well past time to revisit what this community is and what *primary* role",
"be both at once causes some friction. For example, * **Editing**: The first",
"the community's wishes (which part of the community should I follow in acting",
"a community? --- Note: this is not a question about a specific scenario",
"and answers as an archive for interested readers.** The main goal of this",
"(I think [Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/) is an example of the former, and [MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/) is",
"make it as easy as possible for others to get/find accurate, focused answers",
"no longer add any value to the author of a post or to",
"for offensive comments). * **Answers:** On the first Academia.SE, answers that might be",
"post or to future readers are distracting, and should be removed (once they",
"And I think it leads to conflict between users (in a bad way,",
"the second Academia.SE, if a question is broadly relevant to academia and *someone*",
"be different things to different users, is (I think) not healthy. As a",
"others to get/find accurate, focused answers to questions and problems that are within",
"the second Academia.SE, answers that aren't really answers are useful content, and should",
"extended thanks, over-lengthy and irrelevant personal information, and pleas of desperation) while still",
"to get/find accurate, focused answers to questions and problems that are within the",
"to make it as easy as possible for others to get/find accurate, focused",
"expressed on meta). And I think it leads to conflict between users (in",
"am looking for answers that address the general idea of \"What should Academia.SE",
"are within the scope of this site. 2. **We are facilitating \"on-the-record\" problem-solving",
"to comment, or deleted, so as not to distract from \"real\" answers. On",
"about *what the current community wants from this site.* #1 and #2 are",
"The first Academia.SE encourages editing - improving question titles, removing \"noise\" (\"sorry for",
"answers as an archive for interested readers.** The main goal of this site",
"wishes (which part of the community should I follow in acting on flags)?",
"Note: this is not a question about a specific scenario or a specific",
"year, and I think it's well past time to revisit what this community",
"healthy way). We have grown [quite a lot](http://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/161411/site-activity-and-votegraph?Weeks=180#graph) (and graduated!) in the last",
"who participated in it, with the entire thread preserved for the benefit of",
"is not a question about a specific scenario or a specific site policy.",
"made CW to explicitly signal that edits are welcome. * **Closing questions:** On",
"is an example of the latter), but trying to be both at once",
"an example of the former, and [MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/) is an example of the latter),",
"* **Editing**: The first Academia.SE encourages editing - improving question titles, removing \"noise\"",
"a part of the historical record of the communication, and should preserved (except",
"flags)? It is confusing to new users, since the site policies are so",
"improving question titles, removing \"noise\" (\"sorry for the dumb question,\" extended thanks, over-lengthy",
"to revisit what this community is and what *primary* role it serves. Do",
"site.* #1 and #2 are just things I've heard from users in the",
"should I follow in acting on flags)? It is confusing to new users,",
"was not intended to be a \"Choose #1 or #2 proposal.\" This was",
"think it's well past time to revisit what this community is and what",
"we've had several disagreements on meta that I think stem from slightly conflicting",
"to academia and *someone* is willing to answer it, it should stay open/be",
"it serves. Do we want to tend more towards Academia.SE #1 or Academia.SE",
"participated in it, with the entire thread preserved for the benefit of participants",
"Academia.SE #1 or Academia.SE #2? How far do we want to go in",
"no longer serve a useful purpose). To the second Academia.SE, comments are a",
"for the dumb question,\" extended thanks, over-lengthy and irrelevant personal information, and pleas",
"site policies are so inconsistent (both in action, and as expressed on meta).",
"looking for answers that address the general idea of \"What should Academia.SE be?\"",
"is made CW to explicitly signal that edits are welcome. * **Closing questions:**",
"readers.** The main goal of this site is to help both those asking",
"* **Closing questions:** On the first Academia.SE, questions that are outside the scope",
"add any value to the author of a post or to future readers",
"to help both those asking questions *and* future Google users. We want to",
"- but trying to be both at once, or to be different things",
"leads to conflict between users (in a bad way, not in a healthy",
"CW to explicitly signal that edits are welcome. * **Closing questions:** On the",
"that edits are welcome. * **Closing questions:** On the first Academia.SE, questions that",
"(as defined on meta) are \"noise\" and should be closed and/or edited to",
"which edits are discouraged unless a post is made CW to explicitly signal",
"reopened if it's closed. * **Comments:** To the first Academia.SE, comments that no",
"* **Comments:** To the first Academia.SE, comments that no longer add any value",
"to fit the scope of the site. On the second Academia.SE, if a",
"between users (in a bad way, not in a healthy way). We have",
"I think it's well past time to revisit what this community is and",
"Academia.SE, if a question is broadly relevant to academia and *someone* is willing",
"thread is to help the people who participated in it, with the entire",
"the community should I follow in acting on flags)? It is confusing to",
"or to be different things to different users, is (I think) not healthy.",
"are just things I've heard from users in the recent past. I am",
"that address the general idea of \"What should Academia.SE be?\" whether they relate",
"a library of concise, clear and correct questions and answers as an archive",
"academia and *someone* is willing to answer it, it should stay open/be reopened",
"still preserving the intent of the OP. The second Academia.SE has a hands-off",
"\"What should Academia.SE be?\" whether they relate to these themes or not. Recently,",
"several disagreements on meta that I think stem from slightly conflicting views of",
"questions and answers as an archive for interested readers.** The main goal of",
"useful and valuable resources (I think [Cross Validated](https://stats.stackexchange.com/) is an example of the",
"to tend more towards Academia.SE #1 or Academia.SE #2? How far do we",
"personal information, and pleas of desperation) while still preserving the intent of the",
"be both at once, or to be different things to different users, is",
"**Editing**: The first Academia.SE encourages editing - improving question titles, removing \"noise\" (\"sorry",
"discussion about *what the current community wants from this site.* #1 and #2",
"friction. For example, * **Editing**: The first Academia.SE encourages editing - improving question",
"users who want to answer those questions. The main purpose of a thread",
"of this site is mostly to connect users with questions to other users",
"The main goal of this site is to help both those asking questions",
"focused answers to questions and problems that are within the scope of this",
"intent of the OP. The second Academia.SE has a hands-off approach to other",
"Academia.SE has a hands-off approach to other people's content, in which edits are",
"scope of the site. On the second Academia.SE, if a question is broadly",
"second Academia.SE, comments are a part of the historical record of the communication,",
"of the latter), but trying to be both at once causes some friction.",
"the last year, and I think it's well past time to revisit what",
"on flags)? It is confusing to new users, since the site policies are",
"[MathOverflow](https://mathoverflow.net/) is an example of the latter), but trying to be both at",
"fit the scope of the site. On the second Academia.SE, if a question",
"I think stem from slightly conflicting views of what this community is (or",
"and/or edited to fit the scope of the site. On the second Academia.SE,",
"as not to distract from \"real\" answers. On the second Academia.SE, answers that"
] |
[
"clear and useful question. Its reopen vote, however, doesn't seem to be going",
"quite clear and useful question. Its reopen vote, however, doesn't seem to be",
"two types of German doctoral programs](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34431/stuctured-vs-individual-german-doctoral-program) was originally rightfully put on hold as",
"such that it appears to me to now by a quite clear and",
"however, doesn't seem to be going anywhere. Is there a reason for this?",
"as being unclear. The original poster then added information, and the question edited",
"between two types of German doctoral programs](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34431/stuctured-vs-individual-german-doctoral-program) was originally rightfully put on hold",
"added information, and the question edited such that it appears to me to",
"programs](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34431/stuctured-vs-individual-german-doctoral-program) was originally rightfully put on hold as being unclear. The original poster",
"poster then added information, and the question edited such that it appears to",
"me to now by a quite clear and useful question. Its reopen vote,",
"The original poster then added information, and the question edited such that it",
"reopen vote, however, doesn't seem to be going anywhere. Is there a reason",
"put on hold as being unclear. The original poster then added information, and",
"to me to now by a quite clear and useful question. Its reopen",
"question. Its reopen vote, however, doesn't seem to be going anywhere. Is there",
"useful question. Its reopen vote, however, doesn't seem to be going anywhere. Is",
"of German doctoral programs](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34431/stuctured-vs-individual-german-doctoral-program) was originally rightfully put on hold as being unclear.",
"German doctoral programs](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34431/stuctured-vs-individual-german-doctoral-program) was originally rightfully put on hold as being unclear. The",
"question edited such that it appears to me to now by a quite",
"it appears to me to now by a quite clear and useful question.",
"and the question edited such that it appears to me to now by",
"the question edited such that it appears to me to now by a",
"by a quite clear and useful question. Its reopen vote, however, doesn't seem",
"[This question on differences between two types of German doctoral programs](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34431/stuctured-vs-individual-german-doctoral-program) was originally",
"on differences between two types of German doctoral programs](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34431/stuctured-vs-individual-german-doctoral-program) was originally rightfully put",
"that it appears to me to now by a quite clear and useful",
"differences between two types of German doctoral programs](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34431/stuctured-vs-individual-german-doctoral-program) was originally rightfully put on",
"vote, however, doesn't seem to be going anywhere. Is there a reason for",
"originally rightfully put on hold as being unclear. The original poster then added",
"then added information, and the question edited such that it appears to me",
"information, and the question edited such that it appears to me to now",
"types of German doctoral programs](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34431/stuctured-vs-individual-german-doctoral-program) was originally rightfully put on hold as being",
"on hold as being unclear. The original poster then added information, and the",
"original poster then added information, and the question edited such that it appears",
"doctoral programs](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34431/stuctured-vs-individual-german-doctoral-program) was originally rightfully put on hold as being unclear. The original",
"being unclear. The original poster then added information, and the question edited such",
"now by a quite clear and useful question. Its reopen vote, however, doesn't",
"edited such that it appears to me to now by a quite clear",
"Its reopen vote, however, doesn't seem to be going anywhere. Is there a",
"a quite clear and useful question. Its reopen vote, however, doesn't seem to",
"was originally rightfully put on hold as being unclear. The original poster then",
"appears to me to now by a quite clear and useful question. Its",
"unclear. The original poster then added information, and the question edited such that",
"question on differences between two types of German doctoral programs](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34431/stuctured-vs-individual-german-doctoral-program) was originally rightfully",
"hold as being unclear. The original poster then added information, and the question",
"and useful question. Its reopen vote, however, doesn't seem to be going anywhere.",
"rightfully put on hold as being unclear. The original poster then added information,",
"to now by a quite clear and useful question. Its reopen vote, however,"
] |
[
"In the comments, she seems to disagree with my view, so I think",
"my view, so I think I should ask for further opinions from users",
"is president of the Italian branch of Wikimedia; this bit of information currently",
"bit of information currently appears on her profile, but not in the answer",
"to disagree with my view, so I think I should ask for further",
"of information currently appears on her profile, but not in the answer itself.",
"from Wikimedia in posters. I think that she should disclose the fact that",
"recent answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/34817/958), user [Aubrey](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/26682/aubrey) speaks about the use of images from Wikimedia in",
"she should disclose the fact that she is president of the Italian branch",
"with my view, so I think I should ask for further opinions from",
"but not in the answer itself. In the comments, she seems to disagree",
"user [Aubrey](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/26682/aubrey) speaks about the use of images from Wikimedia in posters. I",
"think that she should disclose the fact that she is president of the",
"the answer itself. In the comments, she seems to disagree with my view,",
"disagree with my view, so I think I should ask for further opinions",
"seems to disagree with my view, so I think I should ask for",
"the Italian branch of Wikimedia; this bit of information currently appears on her",
"profile, but not in the answer itself. In the comments, she seems to",
"I think that she should disclose the fact that she is president of",
"information currently appears on her profile, but not in the answer itself. In",
"answer itself. In the comments, she seems to disagree with my view, so",
"branch of Wikimedia; this bit of information currently appears on her profile, but",
"her profile, but not in the answer itself. In the comments, she seems",
"about the use of images from Wikimedia in posters. I think that she",
"[this recent answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/34817/958), user [Aubrey](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/26682/aubrey) speaks about the use of images from Wikimedia",
"currently appears on her profile, but not in the answer itself. In the",
"answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/34817/958), user [Aubrey](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/26682/aubrey) speaks about the use of images from Wikimedia in posters.",
"of images from Wikimedia in posters. I think that she should disclose the",
"the comments, she seems to disagree with my view, so I think I",
"on her profile, but not in the answer itself. In the comments, she",
"view, so I think I should ask for further opinions from users and",
"president of the Italian branch of Wikimedia; this bit of information currently appears",
"comments, she seems to disagree with my view, so I think I should",
"appears on her profile, but not in the answer itself. In the comments,",
"so I think I should ask for further opinions from users and moderators.",
"she is president of the Italian branch of Wikimedia; this bit of information",
"not in the answer itself. In the comments, she seems to disagree with",
"Wikimedia in posters. I think that she should disclose the fact that she",
"disclose the fact that she is president of the Italian branch of Wikimedia;",
"In [this recent answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/34817/958), user [Aubrey](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/26682/aubrey) speaks about the use of images from",
"fact that she is president of the Italian branch of Wikimedia; this bit",
"speaks about the use of images from Wikimedia in posters. I think that",
"this bit of information currently appears on her profile, but not in the",
"of the Italian branch of Wikimedia; this bit of information currently appears on",
"images from Wikimedia in posters. I think that she should disclose the fact",
"posters. I think that she should disclose the fact that she is president",
"Italian branch of Wikimedia; this bit of information currently appears on her profile,",
"[Aubrey](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/26682/aubrey) speaks about the use of images from Wikimedia in posters. I think",
"should disclose the fact that she is president of the Italian branch of",
"the fact that she is president of the Italian branch of Wikimedia; this",
"in the answer itself. In the comments, she seems to disagree with my",
"the use of images from Wikimedia in posters. I think that she should",
"of Wikimedia; this bit of information currently appears on her profile, but not",
"she seems to disagree with my view, so I think I should ask",
"in posters. I think that she should disclose the fact that she is",
"that she should disclose the fact that she is president of the Italian",
"use of images from Wikimedia in posters. I think that she should disclose",
"itself. In the comments, she seems to disagree with my view, so I",
"Wikimedia; this bit of information currently appears on her profile, but not in",
"that she is president of the Italian branch of Wikimedia; this bit of"
] |
[
"in my country), math workers are a tiny fraction of the (academic) population,",
"(at least in my country), math workers are a tiny fraction of the",
"This is probably OT, but I'm curious: why there are so many mathematicians",
"made by people who study/research math. Even undergrads post questions. Given that (at",
"I'm curious: why there are so many mathematicians here? It seems to me",
"undergrads post questions. Given that (at least in my country), math workers are",
"post questions. Given that (at least in my country), math workers are a",
"study/research math. Even undergrads post questions. Given that (at least in my country),",
"questions. Given that (at least in my country), math workers are a tiny",
"curious: why there are so many mathematicians here? It seems to me that",
"here? It seems to me that the overall community is made by people",
"workers are a tiny fraction of the (academic) population, this seems an exception.",
"math workers are a tiny fraction of the (academic) population, this seems an",
"me that the overall community is made by people who study/research math. Even",
"Even undergrads post questions. Given that (at least in my country), math workers",
"is made by people who study/research math. Even undergrads post questions. Given that",
"It seems to me that the overall community is made by people who",
"OT, but I'm curious: why there are so many mathematicians here? It seems",
"who study/research math. Even undergrads post questions. Given that (at least in my",
"seems to me that the overall community is made by people who study/research",
"that the overall community is made by people who study/research math. Even undergrads",
"many mathematicians here? It seems to me that the overall community is made",
"least in my country), math workers are a tiny fraction of the (academic)",
"but I'm curious: why there are so many mathematicians here? It seems to",
"that (at least in my country), math workers are a tiny fraction of",
"math. Even undergrads post questions. Given that (at least in my country), math",
"to me that the overall community is made by people who study/research math.",
"so many mathematicians here? It seems to me that the overall community is",
"Given that (at least in my country), math workers are a tiny fraction",
"my country), math workers are a tiny fraction of the (academic) population, this",
"country), math workers are a tiny fraction of the (academic) population, this seems",
"mathematicians here? It seems to me that the overall community is made by",
"people who study/research math. Even undergrads post questions. Given that (at least in",
"is probably OT, but I'm curious: why there are so many mathematicians here?",
"why there are so many mathematicians here? It seems to me that the",
"overall community is made by people who study/research math. Even undergrads post questions.",
"are so many mathematicians here? It seems to me that the overall community",
"community is made by people who study/research math. Even undergrads post questions. Given",
"the overall community is made by people who study/research math. Even undergrads post",
"by people who study/research math. Even undergrads post questions. Given that (at least",
"probably OT, but I'm curious: why there are so many mathematicians here? It",
"there are so many mathematicians here? It seems to me that the overall"
] |
[
"there are comparable questions about individual publishers ([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734), [2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734), [3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)). I thus think,",
"closed [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34723/7734) about an individual conference’s reputability, i.e., as to whether the",
"[2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734), [3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)). I thus think, we should have a clear decision as to",
"clear decision as to whether such questions are welcome here or not. An",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34723/7734) about an individual conference’s reputability, i.e., as to whether the conference is",
"questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734) remained open and there are comparable questions about individual publishers ([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734), [2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734),",
"[a similar questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734) remained open and there are comparable questions about individual publishers",
"reputability, i.e., as to whether the conference is a scam or not. The",
"individual conference’s reputability, i.e., as to whether the conference is a scam or",
"that [a similar questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734) remained open and there are comparable questions about individual",
"is a scam or not. The author correctly remarked that [a similar questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734)",
"conference is a scam or not. The author correctly remarked that [a similar",
"open and there are comparable questions about individual publishers ([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734), [2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734), [3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)). I",
"and there are comparable questions about individual publishers ([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734), [2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734), [3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)). I thus",
"should have a clear decision as to whether such questions are welcome here",
"or not. An important related discussion is: [Should we name names when talking",
"a scam or not. The author correctly remarked that [a similar questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734) remained",
"remarked that [a similar questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734) remained open and there are comparable questions about",
"a clear decision as to whether such questions are welcome here or not.",
"whether such questions are welcome here or not. An important related discussion is:",
"such questions are welcome here or not. An important related discussion is: [Should",
"the conference is a scam or not. The author correctly remarked that [a",
"related discussion is: [Should we name names when talking about bad publishers and",
"questions about individual publishers ([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734), [2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734), [3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)). I thus think, we should have",
"publishers ([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734), [2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734), [3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)). I thus think, we should have a clear decision",
"comparable questions about individual publishers ([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734), [2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734), [3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)). I thus think, we should",
"questions are welcome here or not. An important related discussion is: [Should we",
"i.e., as to whether the conference is a scam or not. The author",
"correctly remarked that [a similar questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734) remained open and there are comparable questions",
"An important related discussion is: [Should we name names when talking about bad",
"an individual conference’s reputability, i.e., as to whether the conference is a scam",
"we closed [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34723/7734) about an individual conference’s reputability, i.e., as to whether",
"scam or not. The author correctly remarked that [a similar questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734) remained open",
"Yesterday, we closed [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34723/7734) about an individual conference’s reputability, i.e., as to",
"[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34723/7734) about an individual conference’s reputability, i.e., as to whether the conference",
"think, we should have a clear decision as to whether such questions are",
"are comparable questions about individual publishers ([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734), [2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734), [3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)). I thus think, we",
"author correctly remarked that [a similar questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734) remained open and there are comparable",
"about an individual conference’s reputability, i.e., as to whether the conference is a",
"have a clear decision as to whether such questions are welcome here or",
"decision as to whether such questions are welcome here or not. An important",
"to whether such questions are welcome here or not. An important related discussion",
"whether the conference is a scam or not. The author correctly remarked that",
"The author correctly remarked that [a similar questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734) remained open and there are",
"about individual publishers ([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734), [2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734), [3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)). I thus think, we should have a",
"are welcome here or not. An important related discussion is: [Should we name",
"here or not. An important related discussion is: [Should we name names when",
"discussion is: [Should we name names when talking about bad publishers and researchers?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1297/7734)",
"important related discussion is: [Should we name names when talking about bad publishers",
"remained open and there are comparable questions about individual publishers ([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734), [2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734), [3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)).",
"not. The author correctly remarked that [a similar questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734) remained open and there",
"thus think, we should have a clear decision as to whether such questions",
"similar questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734) remained open and there are comparable questions about individual publishers ([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734),",
"we should have a clear decision as to whether such questions are welcome",
"as to whether the conference is a scam or not. The author correctly",
"as to whether such questions are welcome here or not. An important related",
"([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734), [2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734), [3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)). I thus think, we should have a clear decision as",
"I thus think, we should have a clear decision as to whether such",
"conference’s reputability, i.e., as to whether the conference is a scam or not.",
"[3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)). I thus think, we should have a clear decision as to whether",
"or not. The author correctly remarked that [a similar questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10261/7734) remained open and",
"individual publishers ([1](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2513/7734), [2](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5466/7734), [3](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15570/7734)). I thus think, we should have a clear",
"to whether the conference is a scam or not. The author correctly remarked",
"not. An important related discussion is: [Should we name names when talking about",
"welcome here or not. An important related discussion is: [Should we name names"
] |
[
"searched the website for the questions about manuscripts and I find [39 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript)",
"[796 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript) which have this keyword included. Should we have a separate tag",
"and I find [39 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript) which have this keyword in their title and",
"questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript) which have this keyword included. Should we have a separate tag for",
"which have this keyword included. Should we have a separate tag for questions",
"find [39 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript) which have this keyword in their title and [796 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript)",
"I find [39 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript) which have this keyword in their title and [796",
"this keyword in their title and [796 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript) which have this keyword included.",
"which have this keyword in their title and [796 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript) which have this",
"title and [796 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript) which have this keyword included. Should we have a",
"and [796 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript) which have this keyword included. Should we have a separate",
"I have searched the website for the questions about manuscripts and I find",
"[39 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript) which have this keyword in their title and [796 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript) which",
"have this keyword in their title and [796 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript) which have this keyword",
"have searched the website for the questions about manuscripts and I find [39",
"for the questions about manuscripts and I find [39 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript) which have this",
"this keyword included. Should we have a separate tag for questions about manuscripts?",
"the questions about manuscripts and I find [39 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript) which have this keyword",
"have this keyword included. Should we have a separate tag for questions about",
"in their title and [796 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript) which have this keyword included. Should we",
"their title and [796 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript) which have this keyword included. Should we have",
"questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript) which have this keyword in their title and [796 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript) which have",
"questions about manuscripts and I find [39 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript) which have this keyword in",
"website for the questions about manuscripts and I find [39 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript) which have",
"the website for the questions about manuscripts and I find [39 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript) which",
"manuscripts and I find [39 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript) which have this keyword in their title",
"keyword in their title and [796 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=manuscript) which have this keyword included. Should",
"about manuscripts and I find [39 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Amanuscript) which have this keyword in their"
] |
[
"they also offer constructive criticism or highlight something useful in the post (e.g.",
"might deleted by another moderator the next day if the same user raises",
"more human and friendly, and are nice to keep around * Some say",
"say they should always be removed. Right now, there is very little consistency",
"flag again. On Academia, under what conditions should \"thank you\" comments be deleted",
"useful in the post (e.g. \"+1, especially for the very useful link\") *",
"moderator one day, then the same comment might deleted by another moderator the",
"on a \"thank you\" comment might be declined by a moderator one day,",
"if the same user raises a flag again. On Academia, under what conditions",
"same user raises a flag again. On Academia, under what conditions should \"thank",
"a moderator one day, then the same comment might deleted by another moderator",
"comments should be deleted. * Some say they make the community more human",
"are useful if they also offer constructive criticism or highlight something useful in",
"Some say they should be removed if there are other, more useful, comments",
"offer constructive criticism or highlight something useful in the post (e.g. \"+1, especially",
"useful comments. * Some say they should always be removed. Right now, there",
"Some say they should always be removed. Right now, there is very little",
"way of the more useful comments. * Some say they should always be",
"and are nice to keep around * Some say they are useful if",
"highlight something useful in the post (e.g. \"+1, especially for the very useful",
"keep around * Some say they are useful if they also offer constructive",
"Some say they make the community more human and friendly, and are nice",
"should be deleted. * Some say they make the community more human and",
"by a moderator one day, then the same comment might deleted by another",
"are nice to keep around * Some say they are useful if they",
"On Academia, under what conditions should \"thank you\" comments be deleted by moderators?",
"on a post, and the thanks get in the way of the more",
"Thank you > > > or > > +1, good answer > >",
"> for moderator deletion as 'too chatty.' There are [varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment) [opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged) on MSE",
"in the way of the more useful comments. * Some say they should",
"removed. Right now, there is very little consistency on this site - a",
"flag comments that say > > Thank you > > > or >",
"you > > > or > > +1, good answer > > >",
"day, then the same comment might deleted by another moderator the next day",
"to keep around * Some say they are useful if they also offer",
"- a flag on a \"thank you\" comment might be declined by a",
"this site sometimes flag comments that say > > Thank you > >",
"the more useful comments. * Some say they should always be removed. Right",
"a post, and the thanks get in the way of the more useful",
"very little consistency on this site - a flag on a \"thank you\"",
"of this site sometimes flag comments that say > > Thank you >",
"constructive criticism or highlight something useful in the post (e.g. \"+1, especially for",
"raises a flag again. On Academia, under what conditions should \"thank you\" comments",
"when such comments should be deleted. * Some say they make the community",
"be deleted. * Some say they make the community more human and friendly,",
"> > for moderator deletion as 'too chatty.' There are [varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment) [opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged) on",
"in the post (e.g. \"+1, especially for the very useful link\") * Some",
"nice to keep around * Some say they are useful if they also",
"removed if there are other, more useful, comments on a post, and the",
"* Some say they are useful if they also offer constructive criticism or",
"they should be removed if there are other, more useful, comments on a",
"or highlight something useful in the post (e.g. \"+1, especially for the very",
"get in the way of the more useful comments. * Some say they",
"be declined by a moderator one day, then the same comment might deleted",
"and the thanks get in the way of the more useful comments. *",
"say they should be removed if there are other, more useful, comments on",
"> or > > +1, good answer > > > for moderator deletion",
"as to when such comments should be deleted. * Some say they make",
"answer > > > for moderator deletion as 'too chatty.' There are [varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment)",
"say they are useful if they also offer constructive criticism or highlight something",
"useful link\") * Some say they should be removed if there are other,",
"deleted by another moderator the next day if the same user raises a",
"comment might deleted by another moderator the next day if the same user",
"friendly, and are nice to keep around * Some say they are useful",
"the way of the more useful comments. * Some say they should always",
"be removed. Right now, there is very little consistency on this site -",
"the post (e.g. \"+1, especially for the very useful link\") * Some say",
"declined by a moderator one day, then the same comment might deleted by",
"they make the community more human and friendly, and are nice to keep",
"* Some say they make the community more human and friendly, and are",
"sometimes flag comments that say > > Thank you > > > or",
"to when such comments should be deleted. * Some say they make the",
"should always be removed. Right now, there is very little consistency on this",
"MSE as to when such comments should be deleted. * Some say they",
"comments that say > > Thank you > > > or > >",
"'too chatty.' There are [varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment) [opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged) on MSE as to when such comments",
"one day, then the same comment might deleted by another moderator the next",
"on this site - a flag on a \"thank you\" comment might be",
"> +1, good answer > > > for moderator deletion as 'too chatty.'",
"the very useful link\") * Some say they should be removed if there",
"chatty.' There are [varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment) [opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged) on MSE as to when such comments should",
"comments on a post, and the thanks get in the way of the",
"for the very useful link\") * Some say they should be removed if",
"especially for the very useful link\") * Some say they should be removed",
"> > > or > > +1, good answer > > > for",
"post, and the thanks get in the way of the more useful comments.",
"or > > +1, good answer > > > for moderator deletion as",
"consistency on this site - a flag on a \"thank you\" comment might",
"same comment might deleted by another moderator the next day if the same",
"they should always be removed. Right now, there is very little consistency on",
"moderator deletion as 'too chatty.' There are [varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment) [opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged) on MSE as to",
"also offer constructive criticism or highlight something useful in the post (e.g. \"+1,",
"site - a flag on a \"thank you\" comment might be declined by",
"the same user raises a flag again. On Academia, under what conditions should",
"the thanks get in the way of the more useful comments. * Some",
"by another moderator the next day if the same user raises a flag",
"flag on a \"thank you\" comment might be declined by a moderator one",
"deletion as 'too chatty.' There are [varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment) [opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged) on MSE as to when",
"they are useful if they also offer constructive criticism or highlight something useful",
"> > > for moderator deletion as 'too chatty.' There are [varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment) [opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged)",
"\"thank you\" comment might be declined by a moderator one day, then the",
"more useful comments. * Some say they should always be removed. Right now,",
"and friendly, and are nice to keep around * Some say they are",
"deleted. * Some say they make the community more human and friendly, and",
"always be removed. Right now, there is very little consistency on this site",
"> > or > > +1, good answer > > > for moderator",
"> Thank you > > > or > > +1, good answer >",
"the same comment might deleted by another moderator the next day if the",
"* Some say they should be removed if there are other, more useful,",
"such comments should be deleted. * Some say they make the community more",
"this site - a flag on a \"thank you\" comment might be declined",
"> > +1, good answer > > > for moderator deletion as 'too",
"a flag on a \"thank you\" comment might be declined by a moderator",
"the next day if the same user raises a flag again. On Academia,",
"thanks get in the way of the more useful comments. * Some say",
"comments. * Some say they should always be removed. Right now, there is",
"post (e.g. \"+1, especially for the very useful link\") * Some say they",
"might be declined by a moderator one day, then the same comment might",
"human and friendly, and are nice to keep around * Some say they",
"a \"thank you\" comment might be declined by a moderator one day, then",
"as 'too chatty.' There are [varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment) [opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged) on MSE as to when such",
"around * Some say they are useful if they also offer constructive criticism",
"very useful link\") * Some say they should be removed if there are",
"is very little consistency on this site - a flag on a \"thank",
"Users of this site sometimes flag comments that say > > Thank you",
"* Some say they should always be removed. Right now, there is very",
"a flag again. On Academia, under what conditions should \"thank you\" comments be",
"Right now, there is very little consistency on this site - a flag",
"site sometimes flag comments that say > > Thank you > > >",
"useful if they also offer constructive criticism or highlight something useful in the",
"link\") * Some say they should be removed if there are other, more",
"that say > > Thank you > > > or > > +1,",
"if there are other, more useful, comments on a post, and the thanks",
"Some say they are useful if they also offer constructive criticism or highlight",
"say they make the community more human and friendly, and are nice to",
"[opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged) on MSE as to when such comments should be deleted. * Some",
"there are other, more useful, comments on a post, and the thanks get",
"be removed if there are other, more useful, comments on a post, and",
"> > Thank you > > > or > > +1, good answer",
"are other, more useful, comments on a post, and the thanks get in",
"if they also offer constructive criticism or highlight something useful in the post",
"something useful in the post (e.g. \"+1, especially for the very useful link\")",
"you\" comment might be declined by a moderator one day, then the same",
"comment might be declined by a moderator one day, then the same comment",
"user raises a flag again. On Academia, under what conditions should \"thank you\"",
"criticism or highlight something useful in the post (e.g. \"+1, especially for the",
"There are [varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment) [opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged) on MSE as to when such comments should be",
"useful, comments on a post, and the thanks get in the way of",
"on MSE as to when such comments should be deleted. * Some say",
"moderator the next day if the same user raises a flag again. On",
"for moderator deletion as 'too chatty.' There are [varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment) [opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged) on MSE as",
"the community more human and friendly, and are nice to keep around *",
"(e.g. \"+1, especially for the very useful link\") * Some say they should",
"there is very little consistency on this site - a flag on a",
"of the more useful comments. * Some say they should always be removed.",
"+1, good answer > > > for moderator deletion as 'too chatty.' There",
"now, there is very little consistency on this site - a flag on",
"another moderator the next day if the same user raises a flag again.",
"say > > Thank you > > > or > > +1, good",
"good answer > > > for moderator deletion as 'too chatty.' There are",
"other, more useful, comments on a post, and the thanks get in the",
"more useful, comments on a post, and the thanks get in the way",
"again. On Academia, under what conditions should \"thank you\" comments be deleted by",
"\"+1, especially for the very useful link\") * Some say they should be",
"are [varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment) [opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged) on MSE as to when such comments should be deleted.",
"should be removed if there are other, more useful, comments on a post,",
"little consistency on this site - a flag on a \"thank you\" comment",
"[varying](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/126180/is-it-acceptable-to-write-a-thank-you-in-a-comment) [opinions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/169994/should-a-thank-you-comment-be-flagged) on MSE as to when such comments should be deleted. *",
"next day if the same user raises a flag again. On Academia, under",
"community more human and friendly, and are nice to keep around * Some",
"then the same comment might deleted by another moderator the next day if",
"day if the same user raises a flag again. On Academia, under what",
"make the community more human and friendly, and are nice to keep around"
] |
[
"tags when we can have a general tag *and* we already have brand",
"'elsevier'\") with only 6 questions tagged or [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") while",
"tagged 'scopus'\") while we have a [publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers \"show questions tagged 'publishers'\") tag with",
"questions tagged 'twitter'\"), etc. with no more than 10 questions tagged; while we",
"etc. with no more than 10 questions tagged; while we have a more",
"can have a general tag *and* we already have brand or website names",
"names, publishers, etc. exists; however, we have a more general tag each of",
"questions tagged or [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") while we have a [publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers",
"website, we have many brand names in form of the website's names, publishers,",
"tagged. The same also situation exists for [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\"), [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter",
"52 questions tagged. The same also situation exists for [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged",
"what is the role of having such brand name tags on the website,",
"the website's names, publishers, etc. exists; however, we have a more general tag",
"as well? And, what can we do to have more orginised tags when",
"can we do to have more orginised tags when we can have a",
"while we have a more general tag [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\"). My",
"tagged 'facebook'\"), [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\"), etc. with no more than 10",
"do to have more orginised tags when we can have a general tag",
"is the role of having such brand name tags on the website, while",
"a general tag *and* we already have brand or website names tags on",
"My question is, what is the role of having such brand name tags",
"tags as well? And, what can we do to have more orginised tags",
"'scopus'\") while we have a [publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers \"show questions tagged 'publishers'\") tag with 52",
"tags on the website, while we have good general tags as well? And,",
"also situation exists for [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\"), [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged",
"10 questions tagged; while we have a more general tag [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions",
"when we can have a general tag *and* we already have brand or",
"general tag [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\"). My question is, what is the",
"6 questions tagged or [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") while we have a",
"\"show questions tagged 'elsevier'\") with only 6 questions tagged or [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions",
"names in form of the website's names, publishers, etc. exists; however, we have",
"exists for [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\"), [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\"), etc.",
"a more general tag [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\"). My question is, what",
"orginised tags when we can have a general tag *and* we already have",
"we have a more general tag each of them. For instance, we have",
"many brand names in form of the website's names, publishers, etc. exists; however,",
"\"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") while we have a [publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers \"show questions tagged 'publishers'\")",
"\"show questions tagged 'twitter'\"), etc. with no more than 10 questions tagged; while",
"exists; however, we have a more general tag each of them. For instance,",
"or [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") while we have a [publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers \"show questions",
"we have [elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier \"show questions tagged 'elsevier'\") with only 6 questions tagged or",
"the website, we have many brand names in form of the website's names,",
"'social-media'\"). My question is, what is the role of having such brand name",
"instance, we have [elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier \"show questions tagged 'elsevier'\") with only 6 questions tagged",
"tagged 'twitter'\"), etc. with no more than 10 questions tagged; while we have",
"have a general tag *and* we already have brand or website names tags",
"no more than 10 questions tagged; while we have a more general tag",
"situation exists for [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\"), [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\"),",
"to have more orginised tags when we can have a general tag *and*",
"have a more general tag [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\"). My question is,",
"general tag each of them. For instance, we have [elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier \"show questions tagged",
"the role of having such brand name tags on the website, while we",
"of them. For instance, we have [elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier \"show questions tagged 'elsevier'\") with only",
"\"show questions tagged 'social-media'\"). My question is, what is the role of having",
"well? And, what can we do to have more orginised tags when we",
"we have good general tags as well? And, what can we do to",
"tag with 52 questions tagged. The same also situation exists for [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show",
"more orginised tags when we can have a general tag *and* we already",
"question is, what is the role of having such brand name tags on",
"tagged 'elsevier'\") with only 6 questions tagged or [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\")",
"questions tagged 'publishers'\") tag with 52 questions tagged. The same also situation exists",
"tagged; while we have a more general tag [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\").",
"good general tags as well? And, what can we do to have more",
"only 6 questions tagged or [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") while we have",
"each of them. For instance, we have [elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier \"show questions tagged 'elsevier'\") with",
"website's names, publishers, etc. exists; however, we have a more general tag each",
"And, what can we do to have more orginised tags when we can",
"have a more general tag each of them. For instance, we have [elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier",
"more than 10 questions tagged; while we have a more general tag [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media",
"same also situation exists for [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\"), [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions",
"questions tagged 'social-media'\"). My question is, what is the role of having such",
"with no more than 10 questions tagged; while we have a more general",
"The same also situation exists for [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\"), [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show",
"\"show questions tagged 'publishers'\") tag with 52 questions tagged. The same also situation",
"tagged or [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") while we have a [publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers \"show",
"have a [publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers \"show questions tagged 'publishers'\") tag with 52 questions tagged. The",
"[twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\"), etc. with no more than 10 questions tagged;",
"we have a more general tag [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\"). My question",
"a [publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers \"show questions tagged 'publishers'\") tag with 52 questions tagged. The same",
"such brand name tags on the website, while we have good general tags",
"have many brand names in form of the website's names, publishers, etc. exists;",
"in form of the website's names, publishers, etc. exists; however, we have a",
"is, what is the role of having such brand name tags on the",
"brand name tags on the website, while we have good general tags as",
"what can we do to have more orginised tags when we can have",
"tagged 'publishers'\") tag with 52 questions tagged. The same also situation exists for",
"the website, while we have good general tags as well? And, what can",
"questions tagged 'elsevier'\") with only 6 questions tagged or [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged",
"For instance, we have [elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier \"show questions tagged 'elsevier'\") with only 6 questions",
"'publishers'\") tag with 52 questions tagged. The same also situation exists for [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook",
"[publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers \"show questions tagged 'publishers'\") tag with 52 questions tagged. The same also",
"[scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") while we have a [publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers \"show questions tagged",
"we have a [publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers \"show questions tagged 'publishers'\") tag with 52 questions tagged.",
"have more orginised tags when we can have a general tag *and* we",
"[elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier \"show questions tagged 'elsevier'\") with only 6 questions tagged or [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show",
"questions tagged 'facebook'\"), [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\"), etc. with no more than",
"etc. exists; however, we have a more general tag each of them. For",
"On the website, we have many brand names in form of the website's",
"while we have a [publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers \"show questions tagged 'publishers'\") tag with 52 questions",
"a more general tag each of them. For instance, we have [elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier \"show",
"we have many brand names in form of the website's names, publishers, etc.",
"them. For instance, we have [elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier \"show questions tagged 'elsevier'\") with only 6",
"more general tag each of them. For instance, we have [elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier \"show questions",
"publishers, etc. exists; however, we have a more general tag each of them.",
"having such brand name tags on the website, while we have good general",
"we do to have more orginised tags when we can have a general",
"questions tagged 'scopus'\") while we have a [publishers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publishers \"show questions tagged 'publishers'\") tag",
"[social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\"). My question is, what is the role of",
"name tags on the website, while we have good general tags as well?",
"however, we have a more general tag each of them. For instance, we",
"of the website's names, publishers, etc. exists; however, we have a more general",
"with 52 questions tagged. The same also situation exists for [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions",
"than 10 questions tagged; while we have a more general tag [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show",
"while we have good general tags as well? And, what can we do",
"[facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\"), [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\"), etc. with no",
"we can have a general tag *and* we already have brand or website",
"on the website, while we have good general tags as well? And, what",
"website, while we have good general tags as well? And, what can we",
"\"show questions tagged 'facebook'\"), [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\"), etc. with no more",
"general tag *and* we already have brand or website names tags on Academia?",
"tag [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\"). My question is, what is the role",
"role of having such brand name tags on the website, while we have",
"have good general tags as well? And, what can we do to have",
"questions tagged; while we have a more general tag [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged",
"'facebook'\"), [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\"), etc. with no more than 10 questions",
"general tags as well? And, what can we do to have more orginised",
"have [elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier \"show questions tagged 'elsevier'\") with only 6 questions tagged or [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus",
"of having such brand name tags on the website, while we have good",
"questions tagged. The same also situation exists for [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\"),",
"tag each of them. For instance, we have [elsevier](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/elsevier \"show questions tagged 'elsevier'\")",
"brand names in form of the website's names, publishers, etc. exists; however, we",
"more general tag [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\"). My question is, what is",
"form of the website's names, publishers, etc. exists; however, we have a more",
"with only 6 questions tagged or [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") while we",
"tagged 'social-media'\"). My question is, what is the role of having such brand",
"'twitter'\"), etc. with no more than 10 questions tagged; while we have a",
"for [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\"), [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\"), etc. with"
] |
[
"form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ```",
"Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on",
"addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the",
"advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form.",
"twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs *",
"a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and will",
"in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process.",
"If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The",
"mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything else to",
"Please **do not add anything else to the body of the post**. If",
"to this question *must* conform to the following rules, or they will be",
"Community Promotion Ads! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are",
"show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of",
"the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while",
"a way to promote information and resources that are *relevant to your own",
"it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the",
"are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the",
"vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable",
"hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG",
"If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and",
"exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to this question",
"cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material",
"as a way to promote information and resources that are *relevant to your",
"out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click stats [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/ads/display/1478).",
"new cycle of Community Promotion Ads! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community",
"way to promote information and resources that are *relevant to your own community's",
"stuff your community deems important*. This also serves as a way to promote",
"* cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be",
"a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to",
"* Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit",
"for future visitors to find out about *the stuff your community deems important*.",
"Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on",
"'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag",
"can check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click",
"the post**. If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments.",
"is a method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors",
"a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post",
"interests*, both for those already in the community and those yet to join.",
"served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things.",
"community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right",
"serves as a way to promote information and resources that are *relevant to",
"Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in",
"in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from",
"every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad",
"else to the body of the post**. If you want to discuss something,",
"the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story",
"restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service",
"we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the",
"be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the",
"both for those already in the community and those yet to join. ###",
"now time for the site's first new cycle of Community Promotion Ads! ###",
"Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane",
"this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled",
"the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does",
"to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following things:",
"approaches, or has already approached, either way it means that it is now",
"community and will continue to be so, it is a good idea to",
"a **minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**) before it will",
"**minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**) before it will be",
"*the stuff your community deems important*. This also serves as a way to",
"advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This",
"the body of the post**. If you want to discuss something, do it",
"150 KB ### Score Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold** an answer",
"to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year",
"service or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to",
"the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For",
"resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything",
"are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show",
"to the body of the post**. If you want to discuss something, do",
"community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion",
"question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community",
"new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the",
"genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out",
"uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs *",
"might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites",
"score threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**) before it will be shown",
"for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the",
"other things will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting",
"Score Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently",
"the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with",
"Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main",
"of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to",
"in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset",
"answer must meet (currently **6**) before it will be shown on the main",
"community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we",
"an answer must meet (currently **6**) before it will be shown on the",
"(currently **6**) before it will be shown on the main site. You can",
"ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions",
"they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form",
"required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must be",
"those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year?",
"years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces to show",
"community deems important*. This also serves as a way to promote information and",
"and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences *",
"do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over",
"be shown on the main site. You can check out the ads that",
"(imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute",
"the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is",
"community's interests*, both for those already in the community and those yet to",
"will continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost it.",
"in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic",
"main site. You can check out the ads that have met the threshold",
"the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have",
"show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything",
"[1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything else to the",
"the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images",
"the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the",
"join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will",
"newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not",
"subject matter of the community, but to the current status of the community.",
"information and resources that are *relevant to your own community's interests*, both for",
"against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or",
"rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the",
"it a new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery",
"the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be",
"up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this",
"campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community",
"in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community,",
"ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very",
"you create must be **220 x 250 pixels** * Must be hosted through",
"things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just",
"the community, but to the current status of the community. We reset the",
"No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB ###",
"on the site. For example, you might promote the following things: * the",
"add anything else to the body of the post**. If you want to",
"it means that it is now time for the site's first new cycle",
"site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting",
"anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for",
"every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things",
"Image requirements * The image that you create must be **220 x 250",
"How does it work? The answers you post to this question *must* conform",
"of a new year, 2015, now approaches, or has already approached, either way",
"this question *must* conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored.",
"on file size of 150 KB ### Score Threshold There is a **minimum",
"out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in",
"will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads",
"or has already approached, either way it means that it is now time",
"or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to be",
"reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have",
"while other things will wane to allow for new faces to show up.",
"the subject matter of the community, but to the current status of the",
"will be shown on the main site. You can check out the ads",
"usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow for new",
"questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements,",
"* Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB ### Score Threshold There",
"on the main site. You can check out the ads that have met",
"yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some",
"that will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The",
"The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged",
"### Score Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold** an answer must meet",
"previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the",
"and resources that are *relevant to your own community's interests*, both for those",
"December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from",
"valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it is a",
"our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No",
"is for future visitors to find out about *the stuff your community deems",
"in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url",
"future visitors to find out about *the stuff your community deems important*. This",
"tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this",
"example, you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account *",
"of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The",
"question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\")",
"those already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do",
"have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer",
"that you create must be **220 x 250 pixels** * Must be hosted",
"In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills",
"that it is now time for the site's first new cycle of Community",
"the site. For example, you might promote the following things: * the site's",
"* Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be",
"be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file",
"on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question",
"or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The",
"functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the",
"you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic",
"now approaches, or has already approached, either way it means that it is",
"community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads",
"discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be",
"resources that are *relevant to your own community's interests*, both for those already",
"and will continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost",
"It may be helpful to give it a new face in the process,",
"year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose",
"[2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything else to the body of",
"create must be **220 x 250 pixels** * Must be hosted through our",
"requirements * The image that you create must be **220 x 250 pixels**",
"cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community",
"* academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events",
"maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow for",
"Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that",
"the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of",
"purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps",
"ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other",
"and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out",
"means that it is now time for the site's first new cycle of",
"the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads?",
"Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up",
"This is a method for the community to control what gets promoted to",
"before it will be shown on the main site. You can check out",
"services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to",
"PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150",
"process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale",
"story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community would",
"Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness",
"form with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that",
"always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In",
"promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle.",
"show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old",
"the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required",
"give it a new face in the process, so as to prevent the",
"The image that you create must be **220 x 250 pixels** * Must",
"stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers",
"very valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it is",
"else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future",
"to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services",
"Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements",
"You can check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic",
"in The goal is for future visitors to find out about *the stuff",
"the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads",
"to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep",
"it is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to",
"faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and",
"from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable",
"to your own community's interests*, both for those already in the community and",
"Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**)",
"that are *relevant to your own community's interests*, both for those already in",
"size of 150 KB ### Score Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold**",
"enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form",
"The goal is for future visitors to find out about *the stuff your",
"have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control",
"be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a",
"something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged",
"All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show",
"after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you",
"meet (currently **6**) before it will be shown on the main site. You",
"particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue",
"interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your",
"so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful",
"year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will",
"material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the",
"have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a",
"is a **minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**) before it",
"does it work? The answers you post to this question *must* conform to",
"the years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces to",
"be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]:",
"matter of the community, but to the current status of the community. We",
"community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to",
"of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to this",
"### How does it work? The answers you post to this question *must*",
"are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ###",
"http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything else to the body of the",
"reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad",
"post to this question *must* conform to the following rules, or they will",
"site. You can check out the ads that have met the threshold with",
"1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to",
"[![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not",
"ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads",
"face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad",
"answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image",
"but to the current status of the community. We reset the ads once",
"enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion",
"or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of",
"will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose",
"own community's interests*, both for those already in the community and those yet",
"events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested in",
"tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also",
"the community and will continue to be so, it is a good idea",
"of the post**. If you want to discuss something, do it in the",
"is very valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it",
"We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads",
"for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to",
"community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous",
"Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site,",
"the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure.",
"idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new",
"will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community",
"to promote information and resources that are *relevant to your own community's interests*,",
"the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but",
"it will be shown on the main site. You can check out the",
"**do not add anything else to the body of the post**. If you",
"following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources *",
"account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool",
"``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do",
"either way it means that it is now time for the site's first",
"has already approached, either way it means that it is now time for",
"control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might",
"The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a",
"form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must be **220",
"be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ```",
"ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to be so,",
"a method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on",
"threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**) before it will be shown on",
"the current status of the community. We reset the ads once a year,",
"* anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is",
"magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality",
"* the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus",
"to find out about *the stuff your community deems important*. This also serves",
"for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate",
"status of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December.",
"a new year, 2015, now approaches, or has already approached, either way it",
"approached, either way it means that it is now time for the site's",
"Ads! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements",
"with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling",
"to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always",
"is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give",
"conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal",
"the main site. You can check out the ads that have met the",
"things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting",
"your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors",
"to not just the subject matter of the community, but to the current",
"your community deems important*. This also serves as a way to promote information",
"ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant",
"process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the",
"not add anything else to the body of the post**. If you want",
"250 pixels** * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) *",
"a new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of",
"allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps",
"year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an",
"an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is",
"your own community's interests*, both for those already in the community and those",
"also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements",
"also serves as a way to promote information and resources that are *relevant",
"prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of",
"this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ###",
"the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will",
"on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything else",
"to the current status of the community. We reset the ads once a",
"and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every",
"just the subject matter of the community, but to the current status of",
"be **220 x 250 pixels** * Must be hosted through our standard image",
"to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should",
"pixels** * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must",
"of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above",
"for those already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why",
"purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are",
"this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and",
"so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after",
"accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be",
"year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to",
"do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with",
"the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no",
"Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF",
"already approached, either way it means that it is now time for the",
"above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must",
"pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements *",
"This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the",
"a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it",
"*relevant to your own community's interests*, both for those already in the community",
"the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the",
"file size of 150 KB ### Score Threshold There is a **minimum score",
"The answers you post to this question *must* conform to the following rules,",
"do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community",
"would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find",
"goal is for future visitors to find out about *the stuff your community",
"and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do",
"relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but to the",
"site's first new cycle of Community Promotion Ads! ### What are Community Promotion",
"as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a",
"limit on file size of 150 KB ### Score Threshold There is a",
"promote information and resources that are *relevant to your own community's interests*, both",
"of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How",
"no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular",
"animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB ### Score",
"the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create",
"dawn of a new year, 2015, now approaches, or has already approached, either",
"you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question",
"to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you",
"find out about *the stuff your community deems important*. This also serves as",
"Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the",
"helpful to give it a new face in the process, so as to",
"it is now time for the site's first new cycle of Community Promotion",
"### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain",
"provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why",
"the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]:",
"exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url",
"*must* conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All",
"good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a",
"the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be",
"\"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the",
"[community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of",
"image that you create must be **220 x 250 pixels** * Must be",
"Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB ### Score Threshold There is",
"from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work?",
"standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated",
"new year, 2015, now approaches, or has already approached, either way it means",
"There is a **minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**) before",
"promote the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and",
"keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter",
"be helpful to give it a new face in the process, so as",
"out about *the stuff your community deems important*. This also serves as a",
"or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact",
"what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote",
"to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year",
"What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will",
"### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for",
"work? The answers you post to this question *must* conform to the following",
"their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This",
"tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to",
"about *the stuff your community deems important*. This also serves as a way",
"method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the",
"the site's first new cycle of Community Promotion Ads! ### What are Community",
"must be **220 x 250 pixels** * Must be hosted through our standard",
"* No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB",
"main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the",
"conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers",
"to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add",
"will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow",
"important*. This also serves as a way to promote information and resources that",
"be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition",
"must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag.",
"already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we",
"### Image requirements * The image that you create must be **220 x",
"Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control what gets",
"anything else to the body of the post**. If you want to discuss",
"GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size",
"The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements",
"for the site's first new cycle of Community Promotion Ads! ### What are",
"imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ###",
"websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences",
"Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the",
"once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against",
"answers you post to this question *must* conform to the following rules, or",
"way it means that it is now time for the site's first new",
"of 150 KB ### Score Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold** an",
"through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG *",
"shown on the main site. You can check out the ads that have",
"KB ### Score Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold** an answer must",
"that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for",
"2015, now approaches, or has already approached, either way it means that it",
"ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If",
"question *must* conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1.",
"with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you",
"This also serves as a way to promote information and resources that are",
"must meet (currently **6**) before it will be shown on the main site.",
"Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control what",
"of Community Promotion Ads! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads",
"to give it a new face in the process, so as to prevent",
"advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar.",
"ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it",
"every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their",
"academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or",
"things will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the",
"gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the",
"wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every",
"image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs",
"fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads",
"site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs",
"to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer",
"be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out about",
"first new cycle of Community Promotion Ads! ### What are Community Promotion Ads?",
"**220 x 250 pixels** * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader",
"* The image that you create must be **220 x 250 pixels** *",
"shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method",
"cycle of Community Promotion Ads! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion",
"comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show",
"repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new face in",
"for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site.",
"Ads? This is a method for the community to control what gets promoted",
"continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It",
"the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The",
"want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must",
"should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2]",
"of the community, but to the current status of the community. We reset",
"year, 2015, now approaches, or has already approached, either way it means that",
"up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads",
"helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to",
"following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in",
"be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or",
"ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but to",
"The dawn of a new year, 2015, now approaches, or has already approached,",
"ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [",
"a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting",
"it. It may be helpful to give it a new face in the",
"will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of:",
"post**. If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2.",
"not just the subject matter of the community, but to the current status",
"reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years,",
"site. For example, you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter",
"visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following things: *",
"``` Please **do not add anything else to the body of the post**.",
"* interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else",
"advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown.",
"check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click stats",
"to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is",
"right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of",
"the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community",
"are *relevant to your own community's interests*, both for those already in the",
"**6**) before it will be shown on the main site. You can check",
"visitors to find out about *the stuff your community deems important*. This also",
"cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested",
"http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything else to the body",
"the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting",
"to be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may",
"tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image",
"you post to this question *must* conform to the following rules, or they",
"helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject",
"For example, you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account",
"answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on",
"interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out about *the",
"to the community and will continue to be so, it is a good",
"to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows",
"Promotion Ads! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted",
"to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new face",
"is now time for the site's first new cycle of Community Promotion Ads!",
"community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example,",
"over the years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces",
"may be helpful to give it a new face in the process, so",
"blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely",
"sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the",
"getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The",
"we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to",
"be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may be",
"the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources",
"deems important*. This also serves as a way to promote information and resources",
"### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that"
] |
[
"give a heads up (either or meta or in chat, whichever seems most",
"is simply that people give a heads up (either or meta or in",
"that they limit such actions to ~10/day, so those of us reviewing can",
"since the questions have a number of up-votes and answers. My questions: 1.",
"to go back once you have finished with a review, so it is",
"--- Edited to add the reasons for my concern: 1. As I am",
"actions to ~10/day, so those of us reviewing can carry out our own",
"coming through for review, I *run out* of reviews that the software will",
"up-votes and answers. My questions: 1. Is somebody doing a systematic purge? 2.",
"purge? 2. If so, what is your system? 3. It seems to me",
"difficult to go back once you have finished with a review, so it",
"the two. 2. When there are a *lot* of items coming through for",
"function on this site, and one without a huge amount of reward. My",
"those of us reviewing can carry out our own portion of the tasks",
"difficult to consider a set of actions as a batch. I thus cannot",
"question from two years ago](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/410/sudden-influx-of-close-votes-on-old-questions), I've noticed a rapid sequence of close votes",
"I *run out* of reviews that the software will allow me to make",
"annoyed about something, or a mixture of the two. 2. When there are",
"to me yesterday). Thus, if long-term curation work occurs at too high a",
"as a batch. I thus cannot readily tell the difference between a batch",
"can inhibit the ability of the community to deal with new questions. I",
"to me that it would be courteous to announce it on meta or",
"user who has gotten annoyed about something, or a mixture of the two.",
"and makes it difficult to go back once you have finished with a",
"the community to deal with new questions. I very much appreciate the work",
"from. Also, the review queue presents things one at a time and makes",
"back once you have finished with a review, so it is difficult to",
"readily tell the difference between a batch of curation work by an established",
"consider a set of actions as a batch. I thus cannot readily tell",
"or meta or in chat, whichever seems most appropriate) when they are about",
"I am not a moderator, the review software does not tell me who",
"or a mixture of the two. 2. When there are a *lot* of",
"~10/day, so those of us reviewing can carry out our own portion of",
"reviews that the software will allow me to make and cannot review any",
"if long-term curation work occurs at too high a rate, it can inhibit",
"rep 15 user who has gotten annoyed about something, or a mixture of",
"items coming through for review, I *run out* of reviews that the software",
"it difficult to go back once you have finished with a review, so",
"chat, whichever seems most appropriate) when they are about to take a large",
"so, what is your system? 3. It seems to me that it would",
"such actions to ~10/day, so those of us reviewing can carry out our",
"to ~10/day, so those of us reviewing can carry out our own portion",
"of us reviewing can carry out our own portion of the tasks more",
"cannot review any more items (this happened to me yesterday). Thus, if long-term",
"with new questions. I very much appreciate the work being put into curation:",
"at a time and makes it difficult to go back once you have",
"review queue presents things one at a time and makes it difficult to",
"the past little while, many of which I have disagreed with since the",
"high a rate, it can inhibit the ability of the community to deal",
"answers. My questions: 1. Is somebody doing a systematic purge? 2. If so,",
"past little while, many of which I have disagreed with since the questions",
"make and cannot review any more items (this happened to me yesterday). Thus,",
"it on meta or at least in chat. Would others agree? --- Edited",
"I have disagreed with since the questions have a number of up-votes and",
"the difference between a batch of curation work by an established user, trolling",
"most appropriate) when they are about to take a large number of closing",
"meta or at least in chat. Would others agree? --- Edited to add",
"with a review, so it is difficult to consider a set of actions",
"difference between a batch of curation work by an established user, trolling by",
"a *lot* of items coming through for review, I *run out* of reviews",
"of close votes over the past little while, many of which I have",
"in chat. Would others agree? --- Edited to add the reasons for my",
"and that they limit such actions to ~10/day, so those of us reviewing",
"a time and makes it difficult to go back once you have finished",
"traffic in the queue is coming from. Also, the review queue presents things",
"batch of curation work by an established user, trolling by a rep 15",
"*run out* of reviews that the software will allow me to make and",
"seems to me that it would be courteous to announce it on meta",
"My questions: 1. Is somebody doing a systematic purge? 2. If so, what",
"batch. I thus cannot readily tell the difference between a batch of curation",
"request is simply that people give a heads up (either or meta or",
"finished with a review, so it is difficult to consider a set of",
"questions: 1. Is somebody doing a systematic purge? 2. If so, what is",
"If so, what is your system? 3. It seems to me that it",
"be courteous to announce it on meta or at least in chat. Would",
"are a *lot* of items coming through for review, I *run out* of",
"occurs at too high a rate, it can inhibit the ability of the",
"[this question from two years ago](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/410/sudden-influx-of-close-votes-on-old-questions), I've noticed a rapid sequence of close",
"review, so it is difficult to consider a set of actions as a",
"that people give a heads up (either or meta or in chat, whichever",
"Thus, if long-term curation work occurs at too high a rate, it can",
"any more items (this happened to me yesterday). Thus, if long-term curation work",
"who has gotten annoyed about something, or a mixture of the two. 2.",
"As I am not a moderator, the review software does not tell me",
"and answers. My questions: 1. Is somebody doing a systematic purge? 2. If",
"a moderator, the review software does not tell me who the traffic in",
"one without a huge amount of reward. My request is simply that people",
"happened to me yesterday). Thus, if long-term curation work occurs at too high",
"the traffic in the queue is coming from. Also, the review queue presents",
"have disagreed with since the questions have a number of up-votes and answers.",
"in the queue is coming from. Also, the review queue presents things one",
"is difficult to consider a set of actions as a batch. I thus",
"who the traffic in the queue is coming from. Also, the review queue",
"have finished with a review, so it is difficult to consider a set",
"set of actions as a batch. I thus cannot readily tell the difference",
"the software will allow me to make and cannot review any more items",
"this site, and one without a huge amount of reward. My request is",
"once you have finished with a review, so it is difficult to consider",
"Also, the review queue presents things one at a time and makes it",
"3. It seems to me that it would be courteous to announce it",
"(either or meta or in chat, whichever seems most appropriate) when they are",
"an established user, trolling by a rep 15 user who has gotten annoyed",
"reward. My request is simply that people give a heads up (either or",
"seems most appropriate) when they are about to take a large number of",
"me yesterday). Thus, if long-term curation work occurs at too high a rate,",
"it is difficult to consider a set of actions as a batch. I",
"trolling by a rep 15 user who has gotten annoyed about something, or",
"add the reasons for my concern: 1. As I am not a moderator,",
"a huge amount of reward. My request is simply that people give a",
"it would be courteous to announce it on meta or at least in",
"reasons for my concern: 1. As I am not a moderator, the review",
"software does not tell me who the traffic in the queue is coming",
"appropriate) when they are about to take a large number of closing or",
"Similar to [this question from two years ago](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/410/sudden-influx-of-close-votes-on-old-questions), I've noticed a rapid sequence",
"tell the difference between a batch of curation work by an established user,",
"deal with new questions. I very much appreciate the work being put into",
"allow me to make and cannot review any more items (this happened to",
"meta or in chat, whichever seems most appropriate) when they are about to",
"me to make and cannot review any more items (this happened to me",
"has gotten annoyed about something, or a mixture of the two. 2. When",
"time and makes it difficult to go back once you have finished with",
"new questions. I very much appreciate the work being put into curation: it's",
"years ago](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/410/sudden-influx-of-close-votes-on-old-questions), I've noticed a rapid sequence of close votes over the past",
"long-term curation work occurs at too high a rate, it can inhibit the",
"rate, it can inhibit the ability of the community to deal with new",
"the work being put into curation: it's an extremely important function on this",
"with since the questions have a number of up-votes and answers. My questions:",
"community to deal with new questions. I very much appreciate the work being",
"take a large number of closing or flagging actions, and that they limit",
"appreciate the work being put into curation: it's an extremely important function on",
"number of closing or flagging actions, and that they limit such actions to",
"a batch of curation work by an established user, trolling by a rep",
"and cannot review any more items (this happened to me yesterday). Thus, if",
"mixture of the two. 2. When there are a *lot* of items coming",
"and one without a huge amount of reward. My request is simply that",
"cannot readily tell the difference between a batch of curation work by an",
"an extremely important function on this site, and one without a huge amount",
"queue presents things one at a time and makes it difficult to go",
"the questions have a number of up-votes and answers. My questions: 1. Is",
"actions, and that they limit such actions to ~10/day, so those of us",
"over the past little while, many of which I have disagreed with since",
"site, and one without a huge amount of reward. My request is simply",
"to announce it on meta or at least in chat. Would others agree?",
"gotten annoyed about something, or a mixture of the two. 2. When there",
"a review, so it is difficult to consider a set of actions as",
"announce it on meta or at least in chat. Would others agree? ---",
"queue is coming from. Also, the review queue presents things one at a",
"items (this happened to me yesterday). Thus, if long-term curation work occurs at",
"out* of reviews that the software will allow me to make and cannot",
"have a number of up-votes and answers. My questions: 1. Is somebody doing",
"for my concern: 1. As I am not a moderator, the review software",
"simply that people give a heads up (either or meta or in chat,",
"moderator, the review software does not tell me who the traffic in the",
"to [this question from two years ago](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/410/sudden-influx-of-close-votes-on-old-questions), I've noticed a rapid sequence of",
"on meta or at least in chat. Would others agree? --- Edited to",
"a number of up-votes and answers. My questions: 1. Is somebody doing a",
"actions as a batch. I thus cannot readily tell the difference between a",
"Edited to add the reasons for my concern: 1. As I am not",
"2. When there are a *lot* of items coming through for review, I",
"I thus cannot readily tell the difference between a batch of curation work",
"or in chat, whichever seems most appropriate) when they are about to take",
"work by an established user, trolling by a rep 15 user who has",
"one at a time and makes it difficult to go back once you",
"about to take a large number of closing or flagging actions, and that",
"to take a large number of closing or flagging actions, and that they",
"My request is simply that people give a heads up (either or meta",
"a batch. I thus cannot readily tell the difference between a batch of",
"2. If so, what is your system? 3. It seems to me that",
"review any more items (this happened to me yesterday). Thus, if long-term curation",
"not a moderator, the review software does not tell me who the traffic",
"coming from. Also, the review queue presents things one at a time and",
"a heads up (either or meta or in chat, whichever seems most appropriate)",
"concern: 1. As I am not a moderator, the review software does not",
"of items coming through for review, I *run out* of reviews that the",
"inhibit the ability of the community to deal with new questions. I very",
"the queue is coming from. Also, the review queue presents things one at",
"not tell me who the traffic in the queue is coming from. Also,",
"a rate, it can inhibit the ability of the community to deal with",
"curation: it's an extremely important function on this site, and one without a",
"between a batch of curation work by an established user, trolling by a",
"least in chat. Would others agree? --- Edited to add the reasons for",
"is coming from. Also, the review queue presents things one at a time",
"of closing or flagging actions, and that they limit such actions to ~10/day,",
"review software does not tell me who the traffic in the queue is",
"a rep 15 user who has gotten annoyed about something, or a mixture",
"It seems to me that it would be courteous to announce it on",
"of actions as a batch. I thus cannot readily tell the difference between",
"I very much appreciate the work being put into curation: it's an extremely",
"of up-votes and answers. My questions: 1. Is somebody doing a systematic purge?",
"questions. I very much appreciate the work being put into curation: it's an",
"*lot* of items coming through for review, I *run out* of reviews that",
"very much appreciate the work being put into curation: it's an extremely important",
"put into curation: it's an extremely important function on this site, and one",
"tell me who the traffic in the queue is coming from. Also, the",
"there are a *lot* of items coming through for review, I *run out*",
"into curation: it's an extremely important function on this site, and one without",
"being put into curation: it's an extremely important function on this site, and",
"system? 3. It seems to me that it would be courteous to announce",
"of the community to deal with new questions. I very much appreciate the",
"the review software does not tell me who the traffic in the queue",
"something, or a mixture of the two. 2. When there are a *lot*",
"people give a heads up (either or meta or in chat, whichever seems",
"disagreed with since the questions have a number of up-votes and answers. My",
"is your system? 3. It seems to me that it would be courteous",
"that the software will allow me to make and cannot review any more",
"number of up-votes and answers. My questions: 1. Is somebody doing a systematic",
"by a rep 15 user who has gotten annoyed about something, or a",
"would be courteous to announce it on meta or at least in chat.",
"or flagging actions, and that they limit such actions to ~10/day, so those",
"makes it difficult to go back once you have finished with a review,",
"it's an extremely important function on this site, and one without a huge",
"sequence of close votes over the past little while, many of which I",
"at too high a rate, it can inhibit the ability of the community",
"somebody doing a systematic purge? 2. If so, what is your system? 3.",
"the ability of the community to deal with new questions. I very much",
"go back once you have finished with a review, so it is difficult",
"little while, many of which I have disagreed with since the questions have",
"while, many of which I have disagreed with since the questions have a",
"of which I have disagreed with since the questions have a number of",
"from two years ago](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/410/sudden-influx-of-close-votes-on-old-questions), I've noticed a rapid sequence of close votes over",
"curation work by an established user, trolling by a rep 15 user who",
"two years ago](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/410/sudden-influx-of-close-votes-on-old-questions), I've noticed a rapid sequence of close votes over the",
"are about to take a large number of closing or flagging actions, and",
"a rapid sequence of close votes over the past little while, many of",
"the review queue presents things one at a time and makes it difficult",
"I've noticed a rapid sequence of close votes over the past little while,",
"1. As I am not a moderator, the review software does not tell",
"a set of actions as a batch. I thus cannot readily tell the",
"amount of reward. My request is simply that people give a heads up",
"courteous to announce it on meta or at least in chat. Would others",
"me who the traffic in the queue is coming from. Also, the review",
"to make and cannot review any more items (this happened to me yesterday).",
"so it is difficult to consider a set of actions as a batch.",
"us reviewing can carry out our own portion of the tasks more effectively.",
"extremely important function on this site, and one without a huge amount of",
"a systematic purge? 2. If so, what is your system? 3. It seems",
"votes over the past little while, many of which I have disagreed with",
"flagging actions, and that they limit such actions to ~10/day, so those of",
"of reviews that the software will allow me to make and cannot review",
"am not a moderator, the review software does not tell me who the",
"to add the reasons for my concern: 1. As I am not a",
"established user, trolling by a rep 15 user who has gotten annoyed about",
"they are about to take a large number of closing or flagging actions,",
"you have finished with a review, so it is difficult to consider a",
"15 user who has gotten annoyed about something, or a mixture of the",
"too high a rate, it can inhibit the ability of the community to",
"closing or flagging actions, and that they limit such actions to ~10/day, so",
"to deal with new questions. I very much appreciate the work being put",
"it can inhibit the ability of the community to deal with new questions.",
"on this site, and one without a huge amount of reward. My request",
"a mixture of the two. 2. When there are a *lot* of items",
"ago](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/410/sudden-influx-of-close-votes-on-old-questions), I've noticed a rapid sequence of close votes over the past little",
"important function on this site, and one without a huge amount of reward.",
"huge amount of reward. My request is simply that people give a heads",
"without a huge amount of reward. My request is simply that people give",
"noticed a rapid sequence of close votes over the past little while, many",
"work being put into curation: it's an extremely important function on this site,",
"more items (this happened to me yesterday). Thus, if long-term curation work occurs",
"ability of the community to deal with new questions. I very much appreciate",
"a large number of closing or flagging actions, and that they limit such",
"of reward. My request is simply that people give a heads up (either",
"for review, I *run out* of reviews that the software will allow me",
"(this happened to me yesterday). Thus, if long-term curation work occurs at too",
"others agree? --- Edited to add the reasons for my concern: 1. As",
"will allow me to make and cannot review any more items (this happened",
"doing a systematic purge? 2. If so, what is your system? 3. It",
"chat. Would others agree? --- Edited to add the reasons for my concern:",
"yesterday). Thus, if long-term curation work occurs at too high a rate, it",
"presents things one at a time and makes it difficult to go back",
"that it would be courteous to announce it on meta or at least",
"my concern: 1. As I am not a moderator, the review software does",
"does not tell me who the traffic in the queue is coming from.",
"through for review, I *run out* of reviews that the software will allow",
"when they are about to take a large number of closing or flagging",
"much appreciate the work being put into curation: it's an extremely important function",
"in chat, whichever seems most appropriate) when they are about to take a",
"work occurs at too high a rate, it can inhibit the ability of",
"heads up (either or meta or in chat, whichever seems most appropriate) when",
"thus cannot readily tell the difference between a batch of curation work by",
"limit such actions to ~10/day, so those of us reviewing can carry out",
"whichever seems most appropriate) when they are about to take a large number",
"to consider a set of actions as a batch. I thus cannot readily",
"software will allow me to make and cannot review any more items (this",
"When there are a *lot* of items coming through for review, I *run",
"Would others agree? --- Edited to add the reasons for my concern: 1.",
"of the two. 2. When there are a *lot* of items coming through",
"which I have disagreed with since the questions have a number of up-votes",
"close votes over the past little while, many of which I have disagreed",
"many of which I have disagreed with since the questions have a number",
"what is your system? 3. It seems to me that it would be",
"user, trolling by a rep 15 user who has gotten annoyed about something,",
"about something, or a mixture of the two. 2. When there are a",
"things one at a time and makes it difficult to go back once",
"two. 2. When there are a *lot* of items coming through for review,",
"up (either or meta or in chat, whichever seems most appropriate) when they",
"so those of us reviewing can carry out our own portion of the",
"of curation work by an established user, trolling by a rep 15 user",
"review, I *run out* of reviews that the software will allow me to",
"Is somebody doing a systematic purge? 2. If so, what is your system?",
"rapid sequence of close votes over the past little while, many of which",
"your system? 3. It seems to me that it would be courteous to",
"curation work occurs at too high a rate, it can inhibit the ability",
"or at least in chat. Would others agree? --- Edited to add the",
"me that it would be courteous to announce it on meta or at",
"large number of closing or flagging actions, and that they limit such actions",
"questions have a number of up-votes and answers. My questions: 1. Is somebody",
"at least in chat. Would others agree? --- Edited to add the reasons",
"1. Is somebody doing a systematic purge? 2. If so, what is your",
"the reasons for my concern: 1. As I am not a moderator, the",
"they limit such actions to ~10/day, so those of us reviewing can carry",
"agree? --- Edited to add the reasons for my concern: 1. As I",
"by an established user, trolling by a rep 15 user who has gotten",
"systematic purge? 2. If so, what is your system? 3. It seems to"
] |
[
"about academia itself. > > > It thus seems to be useful to",
"question appears to be off-topic because it is about the content of an",
"to have a predefined close reason for such cases which then can also",
"because it is about the content of an academic discipline and not about",
"seems to be useful to me to have a predefined close reason for",
"itself. > > > It thus seems to be useful to me to",
"(and before, I flagged questions to which this would have applied regularly): >",
"I obtained closing priviledges and can thus use custom close reasons, I find",
"use custom close reasons, I find myself typing the following sentence on a",
"to be useful to me to have a predefined close reason for such",
"not about academia itself. > > > It thus seems to be useful",
"such cases which then can also be used to give the askers some",
"the askers some help at hand where to ask their question (if at",
"flagged questions to which this would have applied regularly): > > This question",
"and not about academia itself. > > > It thus seems to be",
"closing priviledges and can thus use custom close reasons, I find myself typing",
"is about the content of an academic discipline and not about academia itself.",
"academia itself. > > > It thus seems to be useful to me",
"basis (and before, I flagged questions to which this would have applied regularly):",
"thus seems to be useful to me to have a predefined close reason",
"about the content of an academic discipline and not about academia itself. >",
"academic discipline and not about academia itself. > > > It thus seems",
"before, I flagged questions to which this would have applied regularly): > >",
"> > It thus seems to be useful to me to have a",
"> This question appears to be off-topic because it is about the content",
"appears to be off-topic because it is about the content of an academic",
"useful to me to have a predefined close reason for such cases which",
"find myself typing the following sentence on a daily basis (and before, I",
"to which this would have applied regularly): > > This question appears to",
"> > This question appears to be off-topic because it is about the",
"be off-topic because it is about the content of an academic discipline and",
"close reasons, I find myself typing the following sentence on a daily basis",
"an academic discipline and not about academia itself. > > > It thus",
"to give the askers some help at hand where to ask their question",
"a predefined close reason for such cases which then can also be used",
"cases which then can also be used to give the askers some help",
"content of an academic discipline and not about academia itself. > > >",
"I find myself typing the following sentence on a daily basis (and before,",
"have applied regularly): > > This question appears to be off-topic because it",
"can thus use custom close reasons, I find myself typing the following sentence",
"the following sentence on a daily basis (and before, I flagged questions to",
"predefined close reason for such cases which then can also be used to",
"myself typing the following sentence on a daily basis (and before, I flagged",
"askers some help at hand where to ask their question (if at all).",
"which then can also be used to give the askers some help at",
"typing the following sentence on a daily basis (and before, I flagged questions",
"reason for such cases which then can also be used to give the",
"have a predefined close reason for such cases which then can also be",
"would have applied regularly): > > This question appears to be off-topic because",
"obtained closing priviledges and can thus use custom close reasons, I find myself",
"me to have a predefined close reason for such cases which then can",
"discipline and not about academia itself. > > > It thus seems to",
"daily basis (and before, I flagged questions to which this would have applied",
"priviledges and can thus use custom close reasons, I find myself typing the",
"> > > It thus seems to be useful to me to have",
"regularly): > > This question appears to be off-topic because it is about",
"questions to which this would have applied regularly): > > This question appears",
"also be used to give the askers some help at hand where to",
"It thus seems to be useful to me to have a predefined close",
"for such cases which then can also be used to give the askers",
"I flagged questions to which this would have applied regularly): > > This",
"it is about the content of an academic discipline and not about academia",
"to me to have a predefined close reason for such cases which then",
"be used to give the askers some help at hand where to ask",
"close reason for such cases which then can also be used to give",
"thus use custom close reasons, I find myself typing the following sentence on",
"of an academic discipline and not about academia itself. > > > It",
"a daily basis (and before, I flagged questions to which this would have",
"following sentence on a daily basis (and before, I flagged questions to which",
"off-topic because it is about the content of an academic discipline and not",
"Since I obtained closing priviledges and can thus use custom close reasons, I",
"reasons, I find myself typing the following sentence on a daily basis (and",
"this would have applied regularly): > > This question appears to be off-topic",
"can also be used to give the askers some help at hand where",
"and can thus use custom close reasons, I find myself typing the following",
"custom close reasons, I find myself typing the following sentence on a daily",
"> It thus seems to be useful to me to have a predefined",
"the content of an academic discipline and not about academia itself. > >",
"give the askers some help at hand where to ask their question (if",
"sentence on a daily basis (and before, I flagged questions to which this",
"be useful to me to have a predefined close reason for such cases",
"used to give the askers some help at hand where to ask their",
"applied regularly): > > This question appears to be off-topic because it is",
"on a daily basis (and before, I flagged questions to which this would",
"This question appears to be off-topic because it is about the content of",
"which this would have applied regularly): > > This question appears to be",
"to be off-topic because it is about the content of an academic discipline",
"then can also be used to give the askers some help at hand"
] |
[
"time that I last edited it, but doesn't seem to now. * Questions",
"use of statistics in academic research. Statistics is the science of collecting, analyzing",
"a question on mobile site, for example). Any suggestions? (I believe tags are",
"paper submissions and publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications) I believe the best way to disambiguate is to",
"I last edited it, but doesn't seem to now. * Questions asking for",
"worst offenders. I've seen people apply it to: * Questions on \"standards and",
"to several completely different kinds of questions is a bad tag. The [statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics",
"The [statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics \"show questions tagged 'statistics'\") tag is one of the worst offenders.",
"of questions is a bad tag. The [statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics \"show questions tagged 'statistics'\") tag",
"in this field.\" For example, [Should I do a PhD or Master in",
"[statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics \"show questions tagged 'statistics'\") tag is one of the worst offenders. I've",
"statistical data on research paper submissions and publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications) I believe the best way",
"is a bad tag. The [statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics \"show questions tagged 'statistics'\") tag is one",
"tags to address these different use cases. The tag names should clearly indicate",
"research or academia. For example, [Can you get statistical data on research paper",
"Questions asking for statistics about research or academia. For example, [Can you get",
"data on research paper submissions and publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications) I believe the best way to",
"mobile site, for example). Any suggestions? (I believe tags are limited to 24",
"academic discipline, and programs leading to a degree in this field.\" For example,",
"is referring to, since people don't always read the tag wiki excerpt (they're",
"I used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used) This is the use currently specified by the tag wiki excerpt,",
"a single subject, so a tag that applies to several completely different kinds",
"subject, so a tag that applies to several completely different kinds of questions",
"and publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications) I believe the best way to disambiguate is to have differently-named",
"the worst offenders. I've seen people apply it to: * Questions on \"standards",
"for a career in Data Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science) * Questions on \"the use of statistics",
"data.\" For example, [Should I cite all R packages I used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used) This is",
"and programs leading to a degree in this field.\" For example, [Should I",
"example). Any suggestions? (I believe tags are limited to 24 characters on this",
"a tag that applies to several completely different kinds of questions is a",
"on a single subject, so a tag that applies to several completely different",
"believe the best way to disambiguate is to have differently-named tags to address",
"tag is one of the worst offenders. I've seen people apply it to:",
"[Can you get statistical data on research paper submissions and publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications) I believe",
"* Questions asking for statistics about research or academia. For example, [Can you",
"discipline, and programs leading to a degree in this field.\" For example, [Should",
"Tags are meant to collect questions on a single subject, so a tag",
"as an academic discipline, and programs leading to a degree in this field.\"",
"several completely different kinds of questions is a bad tag. The [statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics \"show",
"and drawing inference from data.\" For example, [Should I cite all R packages",
"the tag wiki excerpt, which reflected the actual use of the tag at",
"best way to disambiguate is to have differently-named tags to address these different",
"to disambiguate is to have differently-named tags to address these different use cases.",
"[Should I do a PhD or Master in Statistics for a career in",
"Statistics is the science of collecting, analyzing and drawing inference from data.\" For",
"get statistical data on research paper submissions and publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications) I believe the best",
"one of the worst offenders. I've seen people apply it to: * Questions",
"the tag is referring to, since people don't always read the tag wiki",
"(they're not easy to get to while posting a question on mobile site,",
"I believe the best way to disambiguate is to have differently-named tags to",
"it to: * Questions on \"standards and conventions specific to statistics as an",
"is one of the worst offenders. I've seen people apply it to: *",
"This is the use currently specified by the tag wiki excerpt, which reflected",
"Statistics for a career in Data Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science) * Questions on \"the use of",
"single subject, so a tag that applies to several completely different kinds of",
"use of the tag at the time that I last edited it, but",
"* Questions on \"the use of statistics in academic research. Statistics is the",
"usage the tag is referring to, since people don't always read the tag",
"read the tag wiki excerpt (they're not easy to get to while posting",
"statistics as an academic discipline, and programs leading to a degree in this",
"of the tag at the time that I last edited it, but doesn't",
"degree in this field.\" For example, [Should I do a PhD or Master",
"publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications) I believe the best way to disambiguate is to have differently-named tags",
"asking for statistics about research or academia. For example, [Can you get statistical",
"differently-named tags to address these different use cases. The tag names should clearly",
"disambiguate is to have differently-named tags to address these different use cases. The",
"For example, [Should I cite all R packages I used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used) This is the",
"to statistics as an academic discipline, and programs leading to a degree in",
"a career in Data Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science) * Questions on \"the use of statistics in",
"\"show questions tagged 'statistics'\") tag is one of the worst offenders. I've seen",
"for example). Any suggestions? (I believe tags are limited to 24 characters on",
"but doesn't seem to now. * Questions asking for statistics about research or",
"* Questions on \"standards and conventions specific to statistics as an academic discipline,",
"or Master in Statistics for a career in Data Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science) * Questions on",
"to have differently-named tags to address these different use cases. The tag names",
"different kinds of questions is a bad tag. The [statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics \"show questions tagged",
"to: * Questions on \"standards and conventions specific to statistics as an academic",
"edited it, but doesn't seem to now. * Questions asking for statistics about",
"of collecting, analyzing and drawing inference from data.\" For example, [Should I cite",
"tag at the time that I last edited it, but doesn't seem to",
"at the time that I last edited it, but doesn't seem to now.",
"that I last edited it, but doesn't seem to now. * Questions asking",
"to while posting a question on mobile site, for example). Any suggestions? (I",
"this field.\" For example, [Should I do a PhD or Master in Statistics",
"inference from data.\" For example, [Should I cite all R packages I used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used)",
"tag that applies to several completely different kinds of questions is a bad",
"these different use cases. The tag names should clearly indicate which usage the",
"used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used) This is the use currently specified by the tag wiki excerpt, which",
"the actual use of the tag at the time that I last edited",
"completely different kinds of questions is a bad tag. The [statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics \"show questions",
"Questions on \"standards and conventions specific to statistics as an academic discipline, and",
"on mobile site, for example). Any suggestions? (I believe tags are limited to",
"all R packages I used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used) This is the use currently specified by the",
"For example, [Should I do a PhD or Master in Statistics for a",
"The tag names should clearly indicate which usage the tag is referring to,",
"excerpt (they're not easy to get to while posting a question on mobile",
"meant to collect questions on a single subject, so a tag that applies",
"field.\" For example, [Should I do a PhD or Master in Statistics for",
"seen people apply it to: * Questions on \"standards and conventions specific to",
"last edited it, but doesn't seem to now. * Questions asking for statistics",
"people apply it to: * Questions on \"standards and conventions specific to statistics",
"of the worst offenders. I've seen people apply it to: * Questions on",
"different use cases. The tag names should clearly indicate which usage the tag",
"drawing inference from data.\" For example, [Should I cite all R packages I",
"of statistics in academic research. Statistics is the science of collecting, analyzing and",
"submissions and publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications) I believe the best way to disambiguate is to have",
"Questions on \"the use of statistics in academic research. Statistics is the science",
"which usage the tag is referring to, since people don't always read the",
"get to while posting a question on mobile site, for example). Any suggestions?",
"for statistics about research or academia. For example, [Can you get statistical data",
"to, since people don't always read the tag wiki excerpt (they're not easy",
"the best way to disambiguate is to have differently-named tags to address these",
"don't always read the tag wiki excerpt (they're not easy to get to",
"to now. * Questions asking for statistics about research or academia. For example,",
"programs leading to a degree in this field.\" For example, [Should I do",
"the time that I last edited it, but doesn't seem to now. *",
"names should clearly indicate which usage the tag is referring to, since people",
"statistics about research or academia. For example, [Can you get statistical data on",
"use cases. The tag names should clearly indicate which usage the tag is",
"is the use currently specified by the tag wiki excerpt, which reflected the",
"For example, [Can you get statistical data on research paper submissions and publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications)",
"doesn't seem to now. * Questions asking for statistics about research or academia.",
"address these different use cases. The tag names should clearly indicate which usage",
"on \"standards and conventions specific to statistics as an academic discipline, and programs",
"actual use of the tag at the time that I last edited it,",
"people don't always read the tag wiki excerpt (they're not easy to get",
"while posting a question on mobile site, for example). Any suggestions? (I believe",
"Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science) * Questions on \"the use of statistics in academic research. Statistics is",
"do a PhD or Master in Statistics for a career in Data Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science)",
"have differently-named tags to address these different use cases. The tag names should",
"a PhD or Master in Statistics for a career in Data Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science) *",
"PhD or Master in Statistics for a career in Data Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science) * Questions",
"\"standards and conventions specific to statistics as an academic discipline, and programs leading",
"and conventions specific to statistics as an academic discipline, and programs leading to",
"questions tagged 'statistics'\") tag is one of the worst offenders. I've seen people",
"from data.\" For example, [Should I cite all R packages I used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used) This",
"now. * Questions asking for statistics about research or academia. For example, [Can",
"packages I used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used) This is the use currently specified by the tag wiki",
"to collect questions on a single subject, so a tag that applies to",
"not easy to get to while posting a question on mobile site, for",
"the tag wiki excerpt (they're not easy to get to while posting a",
"wiki excerpt, which reflected the actual use of the tag at the time",
"applies to several completely different kinds of questions is a bad tag. The",
"offenders. I've seen people apply it to: * Questions on \"standards and conventions",
"science of collecting, analyzing and drawing inference from data.\" For example, [Should I",
"always read the tag wiki excerpt (they're not easy to get to while",
"indicate which usage the tag is referring to, since people don't always read",
"questions on a single subject, so a tag that applies to several completely",
"seem to now. * Questions asking for statistics about research or academia. For",
"questions is a bad tag. The [statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics \"show questions tagged 'statistics'\") tag is",
"specific to statistics as an academic discipline, and programs leading to a degree",
"R packages I used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used) This is the use currently specified by the tag",
"which reflected the actual use of the tag at the time that I",
"conventions specific to statistics as an academic discipline, and programs leading to a",
"academia. For example, [Can you get statistical data on research paper submissions and",
"is to have differently-named tags to address these different use cases. The tag",
"referring to, since people don't always read the tag wiki excerpt (they're not",
"since people don't always read the tag wiki excerpt (they're not easy to",
"site, for example). Any suggestions? (I believe tags are limited to 24 characters",
"'statistics'\") tag is one of the worst offenders. I've seen people apply it",
"a bad tag. The [statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics \"show questions tagged 'statistics'\") tag is one of",
"use currently specified by the tag wiki excerpt, which reflected the actual use",
"on research paper submissions and publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications) I believe the best way to disambiguate",
"to a degree in this field.\" For example, [Should I do a PhD",
"wiki excerpt (they're not easy to get to while posting a question on",
"tag. The [statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics \"show questions tagged 'statistics'\") tag is one of the worst",
"I do a PhD or Master in Statistics for a career in Data",
"Master in Statistics for a career in Data Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science) * Questions on \"the",
"to get to while posting a question on mobile site, for example). Any",
"tag names should clearly indicate which usage the tag is referring to, since",
"in academic research. Statistics is the science of collecting, analyzing and drawing inference",
"an academic discipline, and programs leading to a degree in this field.\" For",
"example, [Should I do a PhD or Master in Statistics for a career",
"specified by the tag wiki excerpt, which reflected the actual use of the",
"tag wiki excerpt, which reflected the actual use of the tag at the",
"collecting, analyzing and drawing inference from data.\" For example, [Should I cite all",
"it, but doesn't seem to now. * Questions asking for statistics about research",
"about research or academia. For example, [Can you get statistical data on research",
"kinds of questions is a bad tag. The [statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics \"show questions tagged 'statistics'\")",
"in Statistics for a career in Data Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science) * Questions on \"the use",
"apply it to: * Questions on \"standards and conventions specific to statistics as",
"statistics in academic research. Statistics is the science of collecting, analyzing and drawing",
"bad tag. The [statistics](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statistics \"show questions tagged 'statistics'\") tag is one of the",
"example, [Should I cite all R packages I used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used) This is the use",
"in Data Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science) * Questions on \"the use of statistics in academic research.",
"is the science of collecting, analyzing and drawing inference from data.\" For example,",
"currently specified by the tag wiki excerpt, which reflected the actual use of",
"to address these different use cases. The tag names should clearly indicate which",
"example, [Can you get statistical data on research paper submissions and publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications) I",
"by the tag wiki excerpt, which reflected the actual use of the tag",
"you get statistical data on research paper submissions and publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications) I believe the",
"that applies to several completely different kinds of questions is a bad tag.",
"I cite all R packages I used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used) This is the use currently specified",
"tag wiki excerpt (they're not easy to get to while posting a question",
"question on mobile site, for example). Any suggestions? (I believe tags are limited",
"research paper submissions and publications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/30898/can-you-get-statistical-data-on-research-paper-submissions-and-publications) I believe the best way to disambiguate is",
"leading to a degree in this field.\" For example, [Should I do a",
"the science of collecting, analyzing and drawing inference from data.\" For example, [Should",
"are meant to collect questions on a single subject, so a tag that",
"career in Data Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science) * Questions on \"the use of statistics in academic",
"the use currently specified by the tag wiki excerpt, which reflected the actual",
"cite all R packages I used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used) This is the use currently specified by",
"a degree in this field.\" For example, [Should I do a PhD or",
"tag is referring to, since people don't always read the tag wiki excerpt",
"tagged 'statistics'\") tag is one of the worst offenders. I've seen people apply",
"on \"the use of statistics in academic research. Statistics is the science of",
"academic research. Statistics is the science of collecting, analyzing and drawing inference from",
"should clearly indicate which usage the tag is referring to, since people don't",
"[Should I cite all R packages I used?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27921/should-i-cite-all-r-packages-i-used) This is the use currently",
"so a tag that applies to several completely different kinds of questions is",
"the tag at the time that I last edited it, but doesn't seem",
"reflected the actual use of the tag at the time that I last",
"I've seen people apply it to: * Questions on \"standards and conventions specific",
"\"the use of statistics in academic research. Statistics is the science of collecting,",
"clearly indicate which usage the tag is referring to, since people don't always",
"excerpt, which reflected the actual use of the tag at the time that",
"cases. The tag names should clearly indicate which usage the tag is referring",
"research. Statistics is the science of collecting, analyzing and drawing inference from data.\"",
"way to disambiguate is to have differently-named tags to address these different use",
"easy to get to while posting a question on mobile site, for example).",
"analyzing and drawing inference from data.\" For example, [Should I cite all R",
"collect questions on a single subject, so a tag that applies to several",
"Any suggestions? (I believe tags are limited to 24 characters on this site.)",
"posting a question on mobile site, for example). Any suggestions? (I believe tags",
"or academia. For example, [Can you get statistical data on research paper submissions",
"Data Science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34508/should-i-do-a-phd-or-master-in-statistics-for-a-career-in-data-science) * Questions on \"the use of statistics in academic research. Statistics"
] |
[
"safely to conclude that this is the official answer? If yes, should my",
"can physicists help in theoretical biology, besides math and fresh perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti) As stated",
"about classes of content interacting with this idea. I'm pretty liberal about how",
"of content interacting with this idea. I'm pretty liberal about how I think",
"no other answer, is it safely to conclude that this is the official",
"physicists help in theoretical biology, besides math and fresh perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti) As stated in",
"it well, that it is better to include than to close. > >",
"As stated in [jakebeal's answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493) in the meta question I ask: > >",
"there is no other answer, is it safely to conclude that this is",
"about scope on this site, though, and so tend to feel that if",
"site, though, and so tend to feel that if something is borderline but",
"I think about scope on this site, though, and so tend to feel",
"was then a bit borderline because it asked about classes of content interacting",
"though, and so tend to feel that if something is borderline but we",
"> > Your question was then a bit borderline because it asked about",
"include than to close. > > > Since there is no other answer,",
"perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti) As stated in [jakebeal's answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493) in the meta question I ask: >",
"ask: > > Your question was then a bit borderline because it asked",
"meta question I ask: > > Your question was then a bit borderline",
"theoretical biology, besides math and fresh perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti) As stated in [jakebeal's answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493) in",
"and fresh perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti) As stated in [jakebeal's answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493) in the meta question I",
"> Your question was then a bit borderline because it asked about classes",
"bit borderline because it asked about classes of content interacting with this idea.",
"better to include than to close. > > > Since there is no",
"than to close. > > > Since there is no other answer, is",
"feel that if something is borderline but we can answer it well, that",
"borderline because it asked about classes of content interacting with this idea. I'm",
"stated in [jakebeal's answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493) in the meta question I ask: > > Your",
"can answer it well, that it is better to include than to close.",
"fresh perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti) As stated in [jakebeal's answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493) in the meta question I ask:",
"besides math and fresh perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti) As stated in [jakebeal's answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493) in the meta",
"Since there is no other answer, is it safely to conclude that this",
"> > > Since there is no other answer, is it safely to",
"it is better to include than to close. > > > Since there",
"that this is the official answer? If yes, should my question be reopened?",
"the meta question I ask: > > Your question was then a bit",
"is my original question: [How can physicists help in theoretical biology, besides math",
"[jakebeal's answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493) in the meta question I ask: > > Your question was",
"to close. > > > Since there is no other answer, is it",
"with this idea. I'm pretty liberal about how I think about scope on",
"math and fresh perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti) As stated in [jakebeal's answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493) in the meta question",
"liberal about how I think about scope on this site, though, and so",
"to feel that if something is borderline but we can answer it well,",
"is it safely to conclude that this is the official answer? If yes,",
"if something is borderline but we can answer it well, that it is",
"classes of content interacting with this idea. I'm pretty liberal about how I",
"to include than to close. > > > Since there is no other",
"other answer, is it safely to conclude that this is the official answer?",
"asked about classes of content interacting with this idea. I'm pretty liberal about",
"Your question was then a bit borderline because it asked about classes of",
"tend to feel that if something is borderline but we can answer it",
"think about scope on this site, though, and so tend to feel that",
"well, that it is better to include than to close. > > >",
"on this site, though, and so tend to feel that if something is",
"to conclude that this is the official answer? If yes, should my question",
"because it asked about classes of content interacting with this idea. I'm pretty",
"so tend to feel that if something is borderline but we can answer",
"answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493) in the meta question I ask: > > Your question was then",
"my original question: [How can physicists help in theoretical biology, besides math and",
"interacting with this idea. I'm pretty liberal about how I think about scope",
"I'm pretty liberal about how I think about scope on this site, though,",
"it safely to conclude that this is the official answer? If yes, should",
"conclude that this is the official answer? If yes, should my question be",
"in the meta question I ask: > > Your question was then a",
"we can answer it well, that it is better to include than to",
"help in theoretical biology, besides math and fresh perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti) As stated in [jakebeal's",
"original question: [How can physicists help in theoretical biology, besides math and fresh",
"Here is my original question: [How can physicists help in theoretical biology, besides",
"> Since there is no other answer, is it safely to conclude that",
"content interacting with this idea. I'm pretty liberal about how I think about",
"about how I think about scope on this site, though, and so tend",
"and so tend to feel that if something is borderline but we can",
"it asked about classes of content interacting with this idea. I'm pretty liberal",
"this site, though, and so tend to feel that if something is borderline",
"question was then a bit borderline because it asked about classes of content",
"answer, is it safely to conclude that this is the official answer? If",
"question: [How can physicists help in theoretical biology, besides math and fresh perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti)",
"a bit borderline because it asked about classes of content interacting with this",
"close. > > > Since there is no other answer, is it safely",
"question I ask: > > Your question was then a bit borderline because",
"> > Since there is no other answer, is it safely to conclude",
"that if something is borderline but we can answer it well, that it",
"is no other answer, is it safely to conclude that this is the",
"in [jakebeal's answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493) in the meta question I ask: > > Your question",
"how I think about scope on this site, though, and so tend to",
"is borderline but we can answer it well, that it is better to",
"then a bit borderline because it asked about classes of content interacting with",
"something is borderline but we can answer it well, that it is better",
"pretty liberal about how I think about scope on this site, though, and",
"I ask: > > Your question was then a bit borderline because it",
"but we can answer it well, that it is better to include than",
"borderline but we can answer it well, that it is better to include",
"scope on this site, though, and so tend to feel that if something",
"[How can physicists help in theoretical biology, besides math and fresh perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti) As",
"answer it well, that it is better to include than to close. >",
"in theoretical biology, besides math and fresh perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti) As stated in [jakebeal's answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493)",
"this idea. I'm pretty liberal about how I think about scope on this",
"that it is better to include than to close. > > > Since",
"biology, besides math and fresh perspectives?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34941/how-can-physicists-help-in-theoretical-biology-besides-math-and-fresh-perspecti) As stated in [jakebeal's answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1486/where-is-the-line-between-a-question-about-doing-research-and-a-question-abou/1493#1493) in the",
"is better to include than to close. > > > Since there is",
"idea. I'm pretty liberal about how I think about scope on this site,"
] |
[
"in my abstract?\". I wanted to suggest an edit of the tile but",
"This question [Can I reference the abstract?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/27179/17966) is a duplicate but I found",
"searching and the title confused me. It's actually about \"Can I reference other",
"reference other things in my abstract?\". I wanted to suggest an edit of",
"things in my abstract?\". I wanted to suggest an edit of the tile",
"but I found it by searching and the title confused me. It's actually",
"other things in my abstract?\". I wanted to suggest an edit of the",
"confused me. It's actually about \"Can I reference other things in my abstract?\".",
"but the question *is* a duplicate. Should I suggest edits to duplicate and/or",
"edit of the tile but the question *is* a duplicate. Should I suggest",
"title confused me. It's actually about \"Can I reference other things in my",
"it by searching and the title confused me. It's actually about \"Can I",
"question [Can I reference the abstract?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/27179/17966) is a duplicate but I found it",
"It's actually about \"Can I reference other things in my abstract?\". I wanted",
"I wanted to suggest an edit of the tile but the question *is*",
"reference the abstract?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/27179/17966) is a duplicate but I found it by searching and",
"abstract?\". I wanted to suggest an edit of the tile but the question",
"found it by searching and the title confused me. It's actually about \"Can",
"the title confused me. It's actually about \"Can I reference other things in",
"me. It's actually about \"Can I reference other things in my abstract?\". I",
"of the tile but the question *is* a duplicate. Should I suggest edits",
"to suggest an edit of the tile but the question *is* a duplicate.",
"suggest an edit of the tile but the question *is* a duplicate. Should",
"the abstract?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/27179/17966) is a duplicate but I found it by searching and the",
"my abstract?\". I wanted to suggest an edit of the tile but the",
"tile but the question *is* a duplicate. Should I suggest edits to duplicate",
"I reference the abstract?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/27179/17966) is a duplicate but I found it by searching",
"an edit of the tile but the question *is* a duplicate. Should I",
"by searching and the title confused me. It's actually about \"Can I reference",
"is a duplicate but I found it by searching and the title confused",
"and the title confused me. It's actually about \"Can I reference other things",
"a duplicate but I found it by searching and the title confused me.",
"about \"Can I reference other things in my abstract?\". I wanted to suggest",
"wanted to suggest an edit of the tile but the question *is* a",
"question *is* a duplicate. Should I suggest edits to duplicate and/or closed questions?",
"abstract?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/27179/17966) is a duplicate but I found it by searching and the title",
"\"Can I reference other things in my abstract?\". I wanted to suggest an",
"actually about \"Can I reference other things in my abstract?\". I wanted to",
"the tile but the question *is* a duplicate. Should I suggest edits to",
"duplicate but I found it by searching and the title confused me. It's",
"I reference other things in my abstract?\". I wanted to suggest an edit",
"the question *is* a duplicate. Should I suggest edits to duplicate and/or closed",
"[Can I reference the abstract?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/27179/17966) is a duplicate but I found it by",
"I found it by searching and the title confused me. It's actually about"
] |
[
"button that actually lets me do that. What I need to do is",
"queue. This is the case for me for 2 out of 3 entries",
"would like to see buttons for up- and downvoting here on the level",
"I really want to be doing is *downvote* the answer. Look specifically at",
"it and none of the **Delete** reasons applies. However, I definitely want to",
"of the **Delete** reasons applies. However, I definitely want to downvote it. There",
"*downvote* the answer. Look specifically at [this example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200). The post is (sorry to",
"I definitely want to downvote it. There is no button that actually lets",
"this queue. I would like to see buttons for up- and downvoting here",
"no button that actually lets me do that. What I need to do",
"reasons applies. However, I definitely want to downvote it. There is no button",
"to downvote it. There is no button that actually lets me do that.",
"the answer. Look specifically at [this example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200). The post is (sorry to the",
"it. There is no button that actually lets me do that. What I",
"in this queue. I would like to see buttons for up- and downvoting",
"post is (sorry to the poster) just bad. I don't want to edit",
"me for 2 out of 3 entries in this queue. I would like",
"**Link** button on the right, and downvote outside of the review queue. This",
"here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/d4rkw.png) Most of the time what I really want to be doing is",
"Ok** (which it doesn't), click the tiny **Link** button on the right, and",
"specifically at [this example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200). The post is (sorry to the poster) just bad.",
"edit it and none of the **Delete** reasons applies. However, I definitely want",
"button on the right, and downvote outside of the review queue. This is",
"and none of the **Delete** reasons applies. However, I definitely want to downvote",
"need to do is press **Looks Ok** (which it doesn't), click the tiny",
"applies. However, I definitely want to downvote it. There is no button that",
"the poster) just bad. I don't want to edit it and none of",
"[this example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200). The post is (sorry to the poster) just bad. I don't",
"that. What I need to do is press **Looks Ok** (which it doesn't),",
"the review queue. This is the case for me for 2 out of",
"want to be doing is *downvote* the answer. Look specifically at [this example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200).",
"and downvote outside of the review queue. This is the case for me",
"right, and downvote outside of the review queue. This is the case for",
"This is the case for me for 2 out of 3 entries in",
"(which it doesn't), click the tiny **Link** button on the right, and downvote",
"just bad. I don't want to edit it and none of the **Delete**",
"for 2 out of 3 entries in this queue. I would like to",
"doing is *downvote* the answer. Look specifically at [this example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200). The post is",
"do is press **Looks Ok** (which it doesn't), click the tiny **Link** button",
"lets me do that. What I need to do is press **Looks Ok**",
"to do is press **Looks Ok** (which it doesn't), click the tiny **Link**",
"What I need to do is press **Looks Ok** (which it doesn't), click",
"click the tiny **Link** button on the right, and downvote outside of the",
"what I really want to be doing is *downvote* the answer. Look specifically",
"on the right, and downvote outside of the review queue. This is the",
"be doing is *downvote* the answer. Look specifically at [this example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200). The post",
"out of 3 entries in this queue. I would like to see buttons",
"case for me for 2 out of 3 entries in this queue. I",
"is *downvote* the answer. Look specifically at [this example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200). The post is (sorry",
"the right, and downvote outside of the review queue. This is the case",
"like to see buttons for up- and downvoting here on the level of",
"poster) just bad. I don't want to edit it and none of the",
"tiny **Link** button on the right, and downvote outside of the review queue.",
" Most of the time what I really want to",
"I need to do is press **Looks Ok** (which it doesn't), click the",
"quality\" review queue:  Most of the time what I",
"answer. Look specifically at [this example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200). The post is (sorry to the poster)",
"queue:  Most of the time what I really want",
"is no button that actually lets me do that. What I need to",
"time what I really want to be doing is *downvote* the answer. Look",
"the case for me for 2 out of 3 entries in this queue.",
"entries in this queue. I would like to see buttons for up- and",
"is press **Looks Ok** (which it doesn't), click the tiny **Link** button on",
"see buttons for up- and downvoting here on the level of **Edit** and",
"However, I definitely want to downvote it. There is no button that actually",
"want to edit it and none of the **Delete** reasons applies. However, I",
"don't want to edit it and none of the **Delete** reasons applies. However,",
"at [this example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200). The post is (sorry to the poster) just bad. I",
"to edit it and none of the **Delete** reasons applies. However, I definitely",
"2 out of 3 entries in this queue. I would like to see",
"for me for 2 out of 3 entries in this queue. I would",
"downvote it. There is no button that actually lets me do that. What",
"definitely want to downvote it. There is no button that actually lets me",
"want to downvote it. There is no button that actually lets me do",
"(sorry to the poster) just bad. I don't want to edit it and",
"**Delete** reasons applies. However, I definitely want to downvote it. There is no",
"of the time what I really want to be doing is *downvote* the",
"the \"low quality\" review queue:  Most of the time",
"Look specifically at [this example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200). The post is (sorry to the poster) just",
"description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/d4rkw.png) Most of the time what I really want to be doing",
"3 entries in this queue. I would like to see buttons for up-",
"bad. I don't want to edit it and none of the **Delete** reasons",
"that actually lets me do that. What I need to do is press",
"the tiny **Link** button on the right, and downvote outside of the review",
"of 3 entries in this queue. I would like to see buttons for",
"I don't want to edit it and none of the **Delete** reasons applies.",
"to be doing is *downvote* the answer. Look specifically at [this example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200). The",
"example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/27936/is-it-normal-for-an-advisor-to-expect-80-hour-workweeks-from-phd-students-and/35200#35200). The post is (sorry to the poster) just bad. I don't want",
"I would like to see buttons for up- and downvoting here on the",
"There is no button that actually lets me do that. What I need",
"to see buttons for up- and downvoting here on the level of **Edit**",
"is (sorry to the poster) just bad. I don't want to edit it",
"doesn't), click the tiny **Link** button on the right, and downvote outside of",
"\"low quality\" review queue:  Most of the time what",
"buttons for up- and downvoting here on the level of **Edit** and **Delete**.",
"review queue:  Most of the time what I really",
"is the case for me for 2 out of 3 entries in this",
"**Looks Ok** (which it doesn't), click the tiny **Link** button on the right,",
"the **Delete** reasons applies. However, I definitely want to downvote it. There is",
"Most of the time what I really want to be doing is *downvote*",
"really want to be doing is *downvote* the answer. Look specifically at [this",
"press **Looks Ok** (which it doesn't), click the tiny **Link** button on the",
"outside of the review queue. This is the case for me for 2",
"of the review queue. This is the case for me for 2 out",
"review queue. This is the case for me for 2 out of 3",
"downvote outside of the review queue. This is the case for me for",
"The post is (sorry to the poster) just bad. I don't want to",
"actually lets me do that. What I need to do is press **Looks",
"In the \"low quality\" review queue:  Most of the",
"queue. I would like to see buttons for up- and downvoting here on",
"image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/d4rkw.png) Most of the time what I really want to be",
"the time what I really want to be doing is *downvote* the answer.",
"to the poster) just bad. I don't want to edit it and none",
"it doesn't), click the tiny **Link** button on the right, and downvote outside",
"me do that. What I need to do is press **Looks Ok** (which",
"none of the **Delete** reasons applies. However, I definitely want to downvote it.",
"do that. What I need to do is press **Looks Ok** (which it"
] |
[
"if someone asks me to write my letter of reference myself? > >",
"I do if someone asks me to write my letter of reference myself?",
"real life, their answers would be something along the lines of \"of course",
"he didn't do any work/made only negative contributions to the project? > >",
"encourage the OP to be ethical, and say stuff like > > You",
"> > Or > > What should I do if someone asks me",
"reference yourself, because doing otherwise would be career suicide, and you are in",
"lines of \"of course you should let him coauthor your paper/write your letter",
"fraud > > > or > > You shouldn't let your colleague be",
"career suicide, and you are in no position to take the moral high",
"to reflect the contribution you made to the project > > > Now",
"the lines of \"of course you should let him coauthor your paper/write your",
"position to take the moral high ground here.\" Why is the prevailing opinion",
"be career suicide, and you are in no position to take the moral",
"is the prevailing opinion on academia.SE so different (and is this a problem)?",
"say stuff like > > You shouldn't write your own letter because that",
"asked these questions to academics in real life, their answers would be something",
"letter because that would be academic fraud > > > or > >",
"reference myself? > > > The answers usually encourage the OP to be",
"questions like > > Should I let a senior student/professor/etc be a coauthor",
"your own letter because that would be academic fraud > > > or",
"What should I do if someone asks me to write my letter of",
"project > > > Now I think if I asked these questions to",
"usually encourage the OP to be ethical, and say stuff like > >",
"do any work/made only negative contributions to the project? > > > Or",
"You shouldn't write your own letter because that would be academic fraud >",
"> > You shouldn't let your colleague be a coauthor because coauthorships are",
"see a lot of questions like > > Should I let a senior",
"I see a lot of questions like > > Should I let a",
"> > or > > You shouldn't let your colleague be a coauthor",
"a lot of questions like > > Should I let a senior student/professor/etc",
"because coauthorships are supposed to reflect the contribution you made to the project",
"questions to academics in real life, their answers would be something along the",
"be something along the lines of \"of course you should let him coauthor",
"The answers usually encourage the OP to be ethical, and say stuff like",
"along the lines of \"of course you should let him coauthor your paper/write",
"> Or > > What should I do if someone asks me to",
"shouldn't write your own letter because that would be academic fraud > >",
"let a senior student/professor/etc be a coauthor on my paper when he didn't",
"> You shouldn't let your colleague be a coauthor because coauthorships are supposed",
"you made to the project > > > Now I think if I",
"high ground here.\" Why is the prevailing opinion on academia.SE so different (and",
"and say stuff like > > You shouldn't write your own letter because",
"You shouldn't let your colleague be a coauthor because coauthorships are supposed to",
"senior student/professor/etc be a coauthor on my paper when he didn't do any",
"> What should I do if someone asks me to write my letter",
"myself? > > > The answers usually encourage the OP to be ethical,",
"shouldn't let your colleague be a coauthor because coauthorships are supposed to reflect",
"in no position to take the moral high ground here.\" Why is the",
"I asked these questions to academics in real life, their answers would be",
"supposed to reflect the contribution you made to the project > > >",
"Should I let a senior student/professor/etc be a coauthor on my paper when",
"the contribution you made to the project > > > Now I think",
"think if I asked these questions to academics in real life, their answers",
"answers would be something along the lines of \"of course you should let",
"answers usually encourage the OP to be ethical, and say stuff like >",
"> Now I think if I asked these questions to academics in real",
"to write my letter of reference myself? > > > The answers usually",
"to take the moral high ground here.\" Why is the prevailing opinion on",
"course you should let him coauthor your paper/write your letter of reference yourself,",
"otherwise would be career suicide, and you are in no position to take",
"coauthor your paper/write your letter of reference yourself, because doing otherwise would be",
"because doing otherwise would be career suicide, and you are in no position",
"take the moral high ground here.\" Why is the prevailing opinion on academia.SE",
"OP to be ethical, and say stuff like > > You shouldn't write",
"made to the project > > > Now I think if I asked",
"your letter of reference yourself, because doing otherwise would be career suicide, and",
"any work/made only negative contributions to the project? > > > Or >",
"would be something along the lines of \"of course you should let him",
"paper/write your letter of reference yourself, because doing otherwise would be career suicide,",
"that would be academic fraud > > > or > > You shouldn't",
"letter of reference yourself, because doing otherwise would be career suicide, and you",
"my paper when he didn't do any work/made only negative contributions to the",
"let him coauthor your paper/write your letter of reference yourself, because doing otherwise",
"to academics in real life, their answers would be something along the lines",
"yourself, because doing otherwise would be career suicide, and you are in no",
"coauthorships are supposed to reflect the contribution you made to the project >",
"> > The answers usually encourage the OP to be ethical, and say",
"> > You shouldn't write your own letter because that would be academic",
"work/made only negative contributions to the project? > > > Or > >",
"you should let him coauthor your paper/write your letter of reference yourself, because",
"\"of course you should let him coauthor your paper/write your letter of reference",
"my letter of reference myself? > > > The answers usually encourage the",
"these questions to academics in real life, their answers would be something along",
"coauthor on my paper when he didn't do any work/made only negative contributions",
"would be career suicide, and you are in no position to take the",
"I let a senior student/professor/etc be a coauthor on my paper when he",
"to the project? > > > Or > > What should I do",
"a coauthor on my paper when he didn't do any work/made only negative",
"your paper/write your letter of reference yourself, because doing otherwise would be career",
"the project > > > Now I think if I asked these questions",
"because that would be academic fraud > > > or > > You",
"would be academic fraud > > > or > > You shouldn't let",
"> > Should I let a senior student/professor/etc be a coauthor on my",
"moral high ground here.\" Why is the prevailing opinion on academia.SE so different",
"doing otherwise would be career suicide, and you are in no position to",
"to the project > > > Now I think if I asked these",
"own letter because that would be academic fraud > > > or >",
"a senior student/professor/etc be a coauthor on my paper when he didn't do",
"write my letter of reference myself? > > > The answers usually encourage",
"him coauthor your paper/write your letter of reference yourself, because doing otherwise would",
"> or > > You shouldn't let your colleague be a coauthor because",
"of questions like > > Should I let a senior student/professor/etc be a",
"or > > You shouldn't let your colleague be a coauthor because coauthorships",
"lot of questions like > > Should I let a senior student/professor/etc be",
"something along the lines of \"of course you should let him coauthor your",
"asks me to write my letter of reference myself? > > > The",
"of reference myself? > > > The answers usually encourage the OP to",
"ground here.\" Why is the prevailing opinion on academia.SE so different (and is",
"me to write my letter of reference myself? > > > The answers",
"let your colleague be a coauthor because coauthorships are supposed to reflect the",
"> > > Now I think if I asked these questions to academics",
"no position to take the moral high ground here.\" Why is the prevailing",
"your colleague be a coauthor because coauthorships are supposed to reflect the contribution",
"of reference yourself, because doing otherwise would be career suicide, and you are",
"> > Now I think if I asked these questions to academics in",
"the moral high ground here.\" Why is the prevailing opinion on academia.SE so",
"contributions to the project? > > > Or > > What should I",
"project? > > > Or > > What should I do if someone",
"ethical, and say stuff like > > You shouldn't write your own letter",
"of \"of course you should let him coauthor your paper/write your letter of",
"only negative contributions to the project? > > > Or > > What",
"the OP to be ethical, and say stuff like > > You shouldn't",
"a coauthor because coauthorships are supposed to reflect the contribution you made to",
"should let him coauthor your paper/write your letter of reference yourself, because doing",
"suicide, and you are in no position to take the moral high ground",
"should I do if someone asks me to write my letter of reference",
"on my paper when he didn't do any work/made only negative contributions to",
"coauthor because coauthorships are supposed to reflect the contribution you made to the",
"reflect the contribution you made to the project > > > Now I",
"academic fraud > > > or > > You shouldn't let your colleague",
"be a coauthor on my paper when he didn't do any work/made only",
"someone asks me to write my letter of reference myself? > > >",
"are in no position to take the moral high ground here.\" Why is",
"their answers would be something along the lines of \"of course you should",
"When browsing this site, I see a lot of questions like > >",
"do if someone asks me to write my letter of reference myself? >",
"> > > The answers usually encourage the OP to be ethical, and",
"this site, I see a lot of questions like > > Should I",
"you are in no position to take the moral high ground here.\" Why",
"are supposed to reflect the contribution you made to the project > >",
"negative contributions to the project? > > > Or > > What should",
"Now I think if I asked these questions to academics in real life,",
"when he didn't do any work/made only negative contributions to the project? >",
"write your own letter because that would be academic fraud > > >",
"Why is the prevailing opinion on academia.SE so different (and is this a",
"academics in real life, their answers would be something along the lines of",
"paper when he didn't do any work/made only negative contributions to the project?",
"colleague be a coauthor because coauthorships are supposed to reflect the contribution you",
"> You shouldn't write your own letter because that would be academic fraud",
"didn't do any work/made only negative contributions to the project? > > >",
"> > > Or > > What should I do if someone asks",
"> > > or > > You shouldn't let your colleague be a",
"> Should I let a senior student/professor/etc be a coauthor on my paper",
"browsing this site, I see a lot of questions like > > Should",
"here.\" Why is the prevailing opinion on academia.SE so different (and is this",
"Or > > What should I do if someone asks me to write",
"> > What should I do if someone asks me to write my",
"the project? > > > Or > > What should I do if",
"like > > You shouldn't write your own letter because that would be",
"> The answers usually encourage the OP to be ethical, and say stuff",
"life, their answers would be something along the lines of \"of course you",
"to be ethical, and say stuff like > > You shouldn't write your",
"site, I see a lot of questions like > > Should I let",
"stuff like > > You shouldn't write your own letter because that would",
"contribution you made to the project > > > Now I think if",
"in real life, their answers would be something along the lines of \"of",
"student/professor/etc be a coauthor on my paper when he didn't do any work/made",
"letter of reference myself? > > > The answers usually encourage the OP",
"be academic fraud > > > or > > You shouldn't let your",
"and you are in no position to take the moral high ground here.\"",
"if I asked these questions to academics in real life, their answers would",
"like > > Should I let a senior student/professor/etc be a coauthor on",
"be ethical, and say stuff like > > You shouldn't write your own",
"I think if I asked these questions to academics in real life, their",
"be a coauthor because coauthorships are supposed to reflect the contribution you made"
] |
[
"think, though, that it could be a good community wiki question, curating an",
"it doesn't fit the normal question model. I do think, though, that it",
"it could be a good community wiki question, curating an informative list of",
"it was put on hold. I think putting it on hold was a",
"answers before it was put on hold. I think putting it on hold",
"I do think, though, that it could be a good community wiki question,",
"doesn't fit the normal question model. I do think, though, that it could",
"hold. I think putting it on hold was a good thing, as it",
"a good community wiki question, curating an informative list of just how much",
"question, curating an informative list of just how much difference and confusion can",
"on hold. I think putting it on hold was a good thing, as",
"good thing, as it doesn't fit the normal question model. I do think,",
"just how much difference and confusion can occur from seemingly precise terminology. Would",
"a good thing, as it doesn't fit the normal question model. I do",
"it on hold was a good thing, as it doesn't fit the normal",
"though, that it could be a good community wiki question, curating an informative",
"putting it on hold was a good thing, as it doesn't fit the",
"science from language differences](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/36887/possible-causes-of-confusion-and-mistakes-in-technical-terminology-in-bilingual) got some really interesting answers before it was put",
"the normal question model. I do think, though, that it could be a",
"much difference and confusion can occur from seemingly precise terminology. Would others agree?",
"in science from language differences](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/36887/possible-causes-of-confusion-and-mistakes-in-technical-terminology-in-bilingual) got some really interesting answers before it was",
"question about confusion in science from language differences](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/36887/possible-causes-of-confusion-and-mistakes-in-technical-terminology-in-bilingual) got some really interesting answers",
"some really interesting answers before it was put on hold. I think putting",
"think putting it on hold was a good thing, as it doesn't fit",
"normal question model. I do think, though, that it could be a good",
"question model. I do think, though, that it could be a good community",
"informative list of just how much difference and confusion can occur from seemingly",
"thing, as it doesn't fit the normal question model. I do think, though,",
"of just how much difference and confusion can occur from seemingly precise terminology.",
"hold was a good thing, as it doesn't fit the normal question model.",
"an informative list of just how much difference and confusion can occur from",
"list of just how much difference and confusion can occur from seemingly precise",
"confusion in science from language differences](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/36887/possible-causes-of-confusion-and-mistakes-in-technical-terminology-in-bilingual) got some really interesting answers before it",
"before it was put on hold. I think putting it on hold was",
"was a good thing, as it doesn't fit the normal question model. I",
"fit the normal question model. I do think, though, that it could be",
"how much difference and confusion can occur from seemingly precise terminology. Would others",
"community wiki question, curating an informative list of just how much difference and",
"about confusion in science from language differences](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/36887/possible-causes-of-confusion-and-mistakes-in-technical-terminology-in-bilingual) got some really interesting answers before",
"be a good community wiki question, curating an informative list of just how",
"was put on hold. I think putting it on hold was a good",
"interesting answers before it was put on hold. I think putting it on",
"really interesting answers before it was put on hold. I think putting it",
"I think putting it on hold was a good thing, as it doesn't",
"could be a good community wiki question, curating an informative list of just",
"as it doesn't fit the normal question model. I do think, though, that",
"language differences](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/36887/possible-causes-of-confusion-and-mistakes-in-technical-terminology-in-bilingual) got some really interesting answers before it was put on hold.",
"differences](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/36887/possible-causes-of-confusion-and-mistakes-in-technical-terminology-in-bilingual) got some really interesting answers before it was put on hold. I",
"on hold was a good thing, as it doesn't fit the normal question",
"curating an informative list of just how much difference and confusion can occur",
"[This question about confusion in science from language differences](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/36887/possible-causes-of-confusion-and-mistakes-in-technical-terminology-in-bilingual) got some really interesting",
"do think, though, that it could be a good community wiki question, curating",
"good community wiki question, curating an informative list of just how much difference",
"from language differences](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/36887/possible-causes-of-confusion-and-mistakes-in-technical-terminology-in-bilingual) got some really interesting answers before it was put on",
"that it could be a good community wiki question, curating an informative list",
"got some really interesting answers before it was put on hold. I think",
"model. I do think, though, that it could be a good community wiki",
"wiki question, curating an informative list of just how much difference and confusion",
"put on hold. I think putting it on hold was a good thing,"
] |
[
"bias, etc. Of course, not all questions benefit from the same kinds of",
"even exists...) Possible aspects to consider include but are not limited to: length,",
"to: length, content, style, tone, disclosing background of answer-er or not, citing outside",
"or not, citing outside sources, addressing question in general vs situation-specific way, answers",
"responses addressing subtleties like this are also very welcome. --- (This post is",
"I am interested in learning what users of this site look for and",
"kinds of answers, and responses addressing subtleties like this are also very welcome.",
"consider include but are not limited to: length, content, style, tone, disclosing background",
"questions benefit from the same kinds of answers, and responses addressing subtleties like",
"content, style, tone, disclosing background of answer-er or not, citing outside sources, addressing",
"stolen from [Biblical Hermeneutics meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers). Yes, I read other SE sites' metas, including",
"this site? (if such a thing even exists...) Possible aspects to consider include",
"general vs situation-specific way, answers from users with or without specific relevant experience,",
"--- (This post is shamelessly stolen from [Biblical Hermeneutics meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers). Yes, I read",
"exceptionally good answers, and what makes them so exceptional, are welcome!) * What",
"or without specific relevant experience, bias, etc. Of course, not all questions benefit",
"Of course, not all questions benefit from the same kinds of answers, and",
"(if such a thing even exists...) Possible aspects to consider include but are",
"not limited to: length, content, style, tone, disclosing background of answer-er or not,",
"with or without specific relevant experience, bias, etc. Of course, not all questions",
"* On this site, what are the characteristics of a good answer? (Examples",
"learning what users of this site look for and appreciate in an answer.",
"[Biblical Hermeneutics meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers). Yes, I read other SE sites' metas, including those of",
"are the characteristics of a bad answer on this site? (if such a",
"and appreciate in an answer. * On this site, what are the characteristics",
"of a bad answer on this site? (if such a thing even exists...)",
"on this site? (if such a thing even exists...) Possible aspects to consider",
"are the characteristics of a good answer? (Examples of exceptionally good answers, and",
"from [Biblical Hermeneutics meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers). Yes, I read other SE sites' metas, including those",
"characteristics of a good answer? (Examples of exceptionally good answers, and what makes",
"background of answer-er or not, citing outside sources, addressing question in general vs",
"all questions benefit from the same kinds of answers, and responses addressing subtleties",
"of a good answer? (Examples of exceptionally good answers, and what makes them",
"citing outside sources, addressing question in general vs situation-specific way, answers from users",
"is shamelessly stolen from [Biblical Hermeneutics meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers). Yes, I read other SE sites'",
"answers from users with or without specific relevant experience, bias, etc. Of course,",
"limited to: length, content, style, tone, disclosing background of answer-er or not, citing",
"welcome. --- (This post is shamelessly stolen from [Biblical Hermeneutics meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers). Yes, I",
"answer. * On this site, what are the characteristics of a good answer?",
"not, citing outside sources, addressing question in general vs situation-specific way, answers from",
"good answer? (Examples of exceptionally good answers, and what makes them so exceptional,",
"course, not all questions benefit from the same kinds of answers, and responses",
"answer on this site? (if such a thing even exists...) Possible aspects to",
"are not limited to: length, content, style, tone, disclosing background of answer-er or",
"the characteristics of a bad answer on this site? (if such a thing",
"(Examples of exceptionally good answers, and what makes them so exceptional, are welcome!)",
"situation-specific way, answers from users with or without specific relevant experience, bias, etc.",
"very welcome. --- (This post is shamelessly stolen from [Biblical Hermeneutics meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers). Yes,",
"in learning what users of this site look for and appreciate in an",
"users of this site look for and appreciate in an answer. * On",
"for and appreciate in an answer. * On this site, what are the",
"What are the characteristics of a bad answer on this site? (if such",
"of answers, and responses addressing subtleties like this are also very welcome. ---",
"site? (if such a thing even exists...) Possible aspects to consider include but",
"thing even exists...) Possible aspects to consider include but are not limited to:",
"this site look for and appreciate in an answer. * On this site,",
"a bad answer on this site? (if such a thing even exists...) Possible",
"include but are not limited to: length, content, style, tone, disclosing background of",
"but are not limited to: length, content, style, tone, disclosing background of answer-er",
"question in general vs situation-specific way, answers from users with or without specific",
"what are the characteristics of a good answer? (Examples of exceptionally good answers,",
"this are also very welcome. --- (This post is shamelessly stolen from [Biblical",
"sources, addressing question in general vs situation-specific way, answers from users with or",
"site, what are the characteristics of a good answer? (Examples of exceptionally good",
"this site, what are the characteristics of a good answer? (Examples of exceptionally",
"in an answer. * On this site, what are the characteristics of a",
"tone, disclosing background of answer-er or not, citing outside sources, addressing question in",
"what makes them so exceptional, are welcome!) * What are the characteristics of",
"site look for and appreciate in an answer. * On this site, what",
"also very welcome. --- (This post is shamelessly stolen from [Biblical Hermeneutics meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers).",
"welcome!) * What are the characteristics of a bad answer on this site?",
"SE sites' metas, including those of sites I don't participate in at all.)",
"Yes, I read other SE sites' metas, including those of sites I don't",
"addressing subtleties like this are also very welcome. --- (This post is shamelessly",
"and what makes them so exceptional, are welcome!) * What are the characteristics",
"Possible aspects to consider include but are not limited to: length, content, style,",
"* What are the characteristics of a bad answer on this site? (if",
"of answer-er or not, citing outside sources, addressing question in general vs situation-specific",
"from users with or without specific relevant experience, bias, etc. Of course, not",
"a good answer? (Examples of exceptionally good answers, and what makes them so",
"makes them so exceptional, are welcome!) * What are the characteristics of a",
"experience, bias, etc. Of course, not all questions benefit from the same kinds",
"users with or without specific relevant experience, bias, etc. Of course, not all",
"way, answers from users with or without specific relevant experience, bias, etc. Of",
"Hermeneutics meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers). Yes, I read other SE sites' metas, including those of sites",
"the same kinds of answers, and responses addressing subtleties like this are also",
"of exceptionally good answers, and what makes them so exceptional, are welcome!) *",
"exceptional, are welcome!) * What are the characteristics of a bad answer on",
"look for and appreciate in an answer. * On this site, what are",
"good answers, and what makes them so exceptional, are welcome!) * What are",
"and responses addressing subtleties like this are also very welcome. --- (This post",
"from the same kinds of answers, and responses addressing subtleties like this are",
"answers, and what makes them so exceptional, are welcome!) * What are the",
"specific relevant experience, bias, etc. Of course, not all questions benefit from the",
"the characteristics of a good answer? (Examples of exceptionally good answers, and what",
"characteristics of a bad answer on this site? (if such a thing even",
"a thing even exists...) Possible aspects to consider include but are not limited",
"in general vs situation-specific way, answers from users with or without specific relevant",
"etc. Of course, not all questions benefit from the same kinds of answers,",
"answers, and responses addressing subtleties like this are also very welcome. --- (This",
"post is shamelessly stolen from [Biblical Hermeneutics meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers). Yes, I read other SE",
"so exceptional, are welcome!) * What are the characteristics of a bad answer",
"exists...) Possible aspects to consider include but are not limited to: length, content,",
"I read other SE sites' metas, including those of sites I don't participate",
"aspects to consider include but are not limited to: length, content, style, tone,",
"answer? (Examples of exceptionally good answers, and what makes them so exceptional, are",
"what users of this site look for and appreciate in an answer. *",
"are welcome!) * What are the characteristics of a bad answer on this",
"are also very welcome. --- (This post is shamelessly stolen from [Biblical Hermeneutics",
"am interested in learning what users of this site look for and appreciate",
"outside sources, addressing question in general vs situation-specific way, answers from users with",
"such a thing even exists...) Possible aspects to consider include but are not",
"same kinds of answers, and responses addressing subtleties like this are also very",
"other SE sites' metas, including those of sites I don't participate in at",
"meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers). Yes, I read other SE sites' metas, including those of sites I",
"appreciate in an answer. * On this site, what are the characteristics of",
"without specific relevant experience, bias, etc. Of course, not all questions benefit from",
"style, tone, disclosing background of answer-er or not, citing outside sources, addressing question",
"benefit from the same kinds of answers, and responses addressing subtleties like this",
"On this site, what are the characteristics of a good answer? (Examples of",
"to consider include but are not limited to: length, content, style, tone, disclosing",
"them so exceptional, are welcome!) * What are the characteristics of a bad",
"subtleties like this are also very welcome. --- (This post is shamelessly stolen",
"like this are also very welcome. --- (This post is shamelessly stolen from",
"length, content, style, tone, disclosing background of answer-er or not, citing outside sources,",
"bad answer on this site? (if such a thing even exists...) Possible aspects",
"answer-er or not, citing outside sources, addressing question in general vs situation-specific way,",
"addressing question in general vs situation-specific way, answers from users with or without",
"interested in learning what users of this site look for and appreciate in",
"relevant experience, bias, etc. Of course, not all questions benefit from the same",
"shamelessly stolen from [Biblical Hermeneutics meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers). Yes, I read other SE sites' metas,",
"of this site look for and appreciate in an answer. * On this",
"vs situation-specific way, answers from users with or without specific relevant experience, bias,",
"an answer. * On this site, what are the characteristics of a good",
"not all questions benefit from the same kinds of answers, and responses addressing",
"(This post is shamelessly stolen from [Biblical Hermeneutics meta](https://hermeneutics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/520/what-are-we-looking-for-in-answers). Yes, I read other",
"read other SE sites' metas, including those of sites I don't participate in",
"disclosing background of answer-er or not, citing outside sources, addressing question in general"
] |
[
"academia.SE site. So if I have a question about writing, which site will",
"> > I think that it is completely overlap with this academia.SE site.",
"I think that it is completely overlap with this academia.SE site. So if",
"and others. > > > I think that it is completely overlap with",
"is a [academic tag](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/academic-writing). Its description says: > > Writing texts in a",
"theses, text books, and others. > > > I think that it is",
"answers if I ask in? Can I cross-duplicate my question to get the",
"Its description says: > > Writing texts in a scientific or educational setting:",
"it is completely overlap with this academia.SE site. So if I have a",
"is completely overlap with this academia.SE site. So if I have a question",
"site will I get the best answers if I ask in? Can I",
"I ask in? Can I cross-duplicate my question to get the best from",
"that in the writers.SE, there is a [academic tag](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/academic-writing). Its description says: >",
"a scientific or educational setting: peer-reviewed articles, theses, text books, and others. >",
"> I think that it is completely overlap with this academia.SE site. So",
"this academia.SE site. So if I have a question about writing, which site",
"the best answers if I ask in? Can I cross-duplicate my question to",
"or educational setting: peer-reviewed articles, theses, text books, and others. > > >",
"have a question about writing, which site will I get the best answers",
"that it is completely overlap with this academia.SE site. So if I have",
"question about writing, which site will I get the best answers if I",
"think that it is completely overlap with this academia.SE site. So if I",
"will I get the best answers if I ask in? Can I cross-duplicate",
"texts in a scientific or educational setting: peer-reviewed articles, theses, text books, and",
"in a scientific or educational setting: peer-reviewed articles, theses, text books, and others.",
"there is a [academic tag](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/academic-writing). Its description says: > > Writing texts in",
"educational setting: peer-reviewed articles, theses, text books, and others. > > > I",
"setting: peer-reviewed articles, theses, text books, and others. > > > I think",
"I find that in the writers.SE, there is a [academic tag](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/academic-writing). Its description",
"completely overlap with this academia.SE site. So if I have a question about",
"I have a question about writing, which site will I get the best",
"tag](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/academic-writing). Its description says: > > Writing texts in a scientific or educational",
"articles, theses, text books, and others. > > > I think that it",
"in? Can I cross-duplicate my question to get the best from both worlds?",
"a [academic tag](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/academic-writing). Its description says: > > Writing texts in a scientific",
"if I ask in? Can I cross-duplicate my question to get the best",
"ask in? Can I cross-duplicate my question to get the best from both",
"peer-reviewed articles, theses, text books, and others. > > > I think that",
"> > Writing texts in a scientific or educational setting: peer-reviewed articles, theses,",
"others. > > > I think that it is completely overlap with this",
"site. So if I have a question about writing, which site will I",
"writing, which site will I get the best answers if I ask in?",
"overlap with this academia.SE site. So if I have a question about writing,",
"which site will I get the best answers if I ask in? Can",
"So if I have a question about writing, which site will I get",
"about writing, which site will I get the best answers if I ask",
"in the writers.SE, there is a [academic tag](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/academic-writing). Its description says: > >",
"says: > > Writing texts in a scientific or educational setting: peer-reviewed articles,",
"I get the best answers if I ask in? Can I cross-duplicate my",
"description says: > > Writing texts in a scientific or educational setting: peer-reviewed",
"with this academia.SE site. So if I have a question about writing, which",
"Writing texts in a scientific or educational setting: peer-reviewed articles, theses, text books,",
"if I have a question about writing, which site will I get the",
"[academic tag](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/academic-writing). Its description says: > > Writing texts in a scientific or",
"get the best answers if I ask in? Can I cross-duplicate my question",
"> > > I think that it is completely overlap with this academia.SE",
"best answers if I ask in? Can I cross-duplicate my question to get",
"the writers.SE, there is a [academic tag](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/academic-writing). Its description says: > > Writing",
"writers.SE, there is a [academic tag](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/academic-writing). Its description says: > > Writing texts",
"text books, and others. > > > I think that it is completely",
"scientific or educational setting: peer-reviewed articles, theses, text books, and others. > >",
"books, and others. > > > I think that it is completely overlap",
"Recently, I find that in the writers.SE, there is a [academic tag](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/academic-writing). Its",
"a question about writing, which site will I get the best answers if",
"find that in the writers.SE, there is a [academic tag](https://writers.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/academic-writing). Its description says:",
"> Writing texts in a scientific or educational setting: peer-reviewed articles, theses, text"
] |
[
"In SE, people ask and answer. In Reddit, people post a link/thinking and",
"more in Reddit, and surprisingly find out a subreddit named [AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/). I know",
"Bad questions may never be closed, but they will never be raised. Can",
"works is different to the way SE works. In SE, people ask and",
"is different to the way SE works. In SE, people ask and answer.",
"people ask and answer. In Reddit, people post a link/thinking and comment. However,",
"closed, but they will never be raised. Can you tell me when should",
"surprisingly find out a subreddit named [AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/). I know that Stack Exchange is",
"way Reddit works is different to the way SE works. In SE, people",
"never be raised. Can you tell me when should I ask questions on",
"different to the way SE works. In SE, people ask and answer. In",
"people post a link/thinking and comment. However, in Q&A subreddit like AskAcademia, I",
"a link/thinking and comment. However, in Q&A subreddit like AskAcademia, I see no",
"will never be raised. Can you tell me when should I ask questions",
"they will never be raised. Can you tell me when should I ask",
"Reddit, and the way Reddit works is different to the way SE works.",
"may never be closed, but they will never be raised. Can you tell",
"In Reddit, people post a link/thinking and comment. However, in Q&A subreddit like",
"and comment. However, in Q&A subreddit like AskAcademia, I see no different to",
"no different to here. Bad questions may never be closed, but they will",
"be raised. Can you tell me when should I ask questions on Reddit",
"comment. However, in Q&A subreddit like AskAcademia, I see no different to here.",
"AskAcademia, I see no different to here. Bad questions may never be closed,",
"I see no different to here. Bad questions may never be closed, but",
"the way Reddit works is different to the way SE works. In SE,",
"here. Bad questions may never be closed, but they will never be raised.",
"that Stack Exchange is not Reddit, and the way Reddit works is different",
"like AskAcademia, I see no different to here. Bad questions may never be",
"answer. In Reddit, people post a link/thinking and comment. However, in Q&A subreddit",
"never be closed, but they will never be raised. Can you tell me",
"find out a subreddit named [AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/). I know that Stack Exchange is not",
"Stack Exchange is not Reddit, and the way Reddit works is different to",
"post a link/thinking and comment. However, in Q&A subreddit like AskAcademia, I see",
"Reddit, and surprisingly find out a subreddit named [AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/). I know that Stack",
"Exchange is not Reddit, and the way Reddit works is different to the",
"you tell me when should I ask questions on Reddit rather than Stack",
"[AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/). I know that Stack Exchange is not Reddit, and the way Reddit",
"involve more in Reddit, and surprisingly find out a subreddit named [AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/). I",
"named [AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/). I know that Stack Exchange is not Reddit, and the way",
"and the way Reddit works is different to the way SE works. In",
"I know that Stack Exchange is not Reddit, and the way Reddit works",
"a subreddit named [AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/). I know that Stack Exchange is not Reddit, and",
"SE works. In SE, people ask and answer. In Reddit, people post a",
"SE, people ask and answer. In Reddit, people post a link/thinking and comment.",
"However, in Q&A subreddit like AskAcademia, I see no different to here. Bad",
"raised. Can you tell me when should I ask questions on Reddit rather",
"Q&A subreddit like AskAcademia, I see no different to here. Bad questions may",
"subreddit named [AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/). I know that Stack Exchange is not Reddit, and the",
"the way SE works. In SE, people ask and answer. In Reddit, people",
"and answer. In Reddit, people post a link/thinking and comment. However, in Q&A",
"out a subreddit named [AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/). I know that Stack Exchange is not Reddit,",
"be closed, but they will never be raised. Can you tell me when",
"Reddit works is different to the way SE works. In SE, people ask",
"in Q&A subreddit like AskAcademia, I see no different to here. Bad questions",
"see no different to here. Bad questions may never be closed, but they",
"and surprisingly find out a subreddit named [AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/). I know that Stack Exchange",
"tell me when should I ask questions on Reddit rather than Stack Exchange?",
"recently involve more in Reddit, and surprisingly find out a subreddit named [AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/).",
"to the way SE works. In SE, people ask and answer. In Reddit,",
"different to here. Bad questions may never be closed, but they will never",
"to here. Bad questions may never be closed, but they will never be",
"know that Stack Exchange is not Reddit, and the way Reddit works is",
"ask and answer. In Reddit, people post a link/thinking and comment. However, in",
"but they will never be raised. Can you tell me when should I",
"not Reddit, and the way Reddit works is different to the way SE",
"I recently involve more in Reddit, and surprisingly find out a subreddit named",
"way SE works. In SE, people ask and answer. In Reddit, people post",
"questions may never be closed, but they will never be raised. Can you",
"in Reddit, and surprisingly find out a subreddit named [AskAcademia](http://www.reddit.com/r/AskAcademia/). I know that",
"works. In SE, people ask and answer. In Reddit, people post a link/thinking",
"link/thinking and comment. However, in Q&A subreddit like AskAcademia, I see no different",
"subreddit like AskAcademia, I see no different to here. Bad questions may never",
"Reddit, people post a link/thinking and comment. However, in Q&A subreddit like AskAcademia,",
"is not Reddit, and the way Reddit works is different to the way",
"Can you tell me when should I ask questions on Reddit rather than"
] |
[
"be allowed? My concern is that are too broad or too particular. Thoughts?",
"physics if my GPA below 3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3) Should these questions be allowed? My concern",
"questions be allowed? My concern is that are too broad or too particular.",
"possible to get into a good masters program in computer science with a",
"the lines of \"Can I get into X program with x.xx GPA?\" *",
"these questions be allowed? My concern is that are too broad or too",
"with a 3-3.5 GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3) * [Can I get a scholarship from graduate school",
"of questions along the lines of \"Can I get into X program with",
"from graduate school in physics if my GPA below 3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3) Should these questions",
"I get a scholarship from graduate school in physics if my GPA below",
"with x.xx GPA?\" * [Is it possible to get into a good masters",
"There's been a couple of questions along the lines of \"Can I get",
"of \"Can I get into X program with x.xx GPA?\" * [Is it",
"get a scholarship from graduate school in physics if my GPA below 3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3)",
"3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3) Should these questions be allowed? My concern is that are too broad",
"program in computer science with a 3-3.5 GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3) * [Can I get a",
"a couple of questions along the lines of \"Can I get into X",
"[Is it possible to get into a good masters program in computer science",
"science with a 3-3.5 GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3) * [Can I get a scholarship from graduate",
"school in physics if my GPA below 3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3) Should these questions be allowed?",
"been a couple of questions along the lines of \"Can I get into",
"3-3.5 GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3) * [Can I get a scholarship from graduate school in physics",
"questions along the lines of \"Can I get into X program with x.xx",
"get into X program with x.xx GPA?\" * [Is it possible to get",
"[Can I get a scholarship from graduate school in physics if my GPA",
"\"Can I get into X program with x.xx GPA?\" * [Is it possible",
"couple of questions along the lines of \"Can I get into X program",
"x.xx GPA?\" * [Is it possible to get into a good masters program",
"into a good masters program in computer science with a 3-3.5 GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3) *",
"it possible to get into a good masters program in computer science with",
"a 3-3.5 GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3) * [Can I get a scholarship from graduate school in",
"in computer science with a 3-3.5 GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3) * [Can I get a scholarship",
"program with x.xx GPA?\" * [Is it possible to get into a good",
"a scholarship from graduate school in physics if my GPA below 3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3) Should",
"my GPA below 3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3) Should these questions be allowed? My concern is that",
"X program with x.xx GPA?\" * [Is it possible to get into a",
"I get into X program with x.xx GPA?\" * [Is it possible to",
"* [Can I get a scholarship from graduate school in physics if my",
"GPA below 3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3) Should these questions be allowed? My concern is that are",
"graduate school in physics if my GPA below 3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3) Should these questions be",
"Should these questions be allowed? My concern is that are too broad or",
"GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3) * [Can I get a scholarship from graduate school in physics if",
"scholarship from graduate school in physics if my GPA below 3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3) Should these",
"to get into a good masters program in computer science with a 3-3.5",
"in physics if my GPA below 3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3) Should these questions be allowed? My",
"computer science with a 3-3.5 GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3) * [Can I get a scholarship from",
"if my GPA below 3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3) Should these questions be allowed? My concern is",
"below 3?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/31812/can-i-get-a-scholarship-from-graduate-school-in-physics-if-my-gpa-below-3) Should these questions be allowed? My concern is that are too",
"GPA?\" * [Is it possible to get into a good masters program in",
"good masters program in computer science with a 3-3.5 GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3) * [Can I",
"along the lines of \"Can I get into X program with x.xx GPA?\"",
"lines of \"Can I get into X program with x.xx GPA?\" * [Is",
"a good masters program in computer science with a 3-3.5 GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3) * [Can",
"masters program in computer science with a 3-3.5 GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3) * [Can I get",
"* [Is it possible to get into a good masters program in computer",
"get into a good masters program in computer science with a 3-3.5 GPA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34767/is-it-possible-to-get-into-a-good-masters-program-in-computer-science-with-a-3-3)",
"into X program with x.xx GPA?\" * [Is it possible to get into"
] |
[
"which seem to be on-topic on site because they are not closed as",
"out whether they are eligible to remain opened? In my opinion, some of",
"are not closed as off-topic or duplicate. How can users be encouraged to",
"and found about [141 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano) which have no answers and are still open,",
"questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano) which have no answers and are still open, these are the questions",
"[141 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano) which have no answers and are still open, these are the",
"to be on-topic on site because they are not closed as off-topic or",
"website and found about [141 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano) which have no answers and are still",
"these questions and answer them, or review them to find out whether there",
"available on website? Should some of these questions reviewed to find out whether",
"of them available on website? Should some of these questions reviewed to find",
"not closed as off-topic or duplicate. How can users be encouraged to take",
"find out whether they are eligible to remain opened? In my opinion, some",
"users be encouraged to take a look at these questions and answer them,",
"answer them, or review them to find out whether there duplicates of them",
"a search to find unanswered questions on website and found about [141 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano)",
"encouraged to take a look at these questions and answer them, or review",
"whether there duplicates of them available on website? Should some of these questions",
"off-topic or duplicate. How can users be encouraged to take a look at",
"to remain opened? In my opinion, some of these questions are good ones,",
"unanswered questions on website and found about [141 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano) which have no answers",
"I did a search to find unanswered questions on website and found about",
"closed as off-topic or duplicate. How can users be encouraged to take a",
"review them to find out whether there duplicates of them available on website?",
"on website and found about [141 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano) which have no answers and are",
"as off-topic or duplicate. How can users be encouraged to take a look",
"open, these are the questions which seem to be on-topic on site because",
"them to find out whether there duplicates of them available on website? Should",
"Should some of these questions reviewed to find out whether they are eligible",
"to find out whether there duplicates of them available on website? Should some",
"find out whether there duplicates of them available on website? Should some of",
"them available on website? Should some of these questions reviewed to find out",
"some of these questions are good ones, however some other may not be",
"In my opinion, some of these questions are good ones, however some other",
"to find out whether they are eligible to remain opened? In my opinion,",
"some of these questions reviewed to find out whether they are eligible to",
"a look at these questions and answer them, or review them to find",
"search to find unanswered questions on website and found about [141 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano) which",
"questions which seem to be on-topic on site because they are not closed",
"to take a look at these questions and answer them, or review them",
"are the questions which seem to be on-topic on site because they are",
"questions and answer them, or review them to find out whether there duplicates",
"seem to be on-topic on site because they are not closed as off-topic",
"site because they are not closed as off-topic or duplicate. How can users",
"questions are good ones, however some other may not be so good to",
"be encouraged to take a look at these questions and answer them, or",
"still open, these are the questions which seem to be on-topic on site",
"are eligible to remain opened? In my opinion, some of these questions are",
"or duplicate. How can users be encouraged to take a look at these",
"and are still open, these are the questions which seem to be on-topic",
"these are the questions which seem to be on-topic on site because they",
"on site because they are not closed as off-topic or duplicate. How can",
"at these questions and answer them, or review them to find out whether",
"How can users be encouraged to take a look at these questions and",
"duplicates of them available on website? Should some of these questions reviewed to",
"on-topic on site because they are not closed as off-topic or duplicate. How",
"did a search to find unanswered questions on website and found about [141",
"remain opened? In my opinion, some of these questions are good ones, however",
"have no answers and are still open, these are the questions which seem",
"opinion, some of these questions are good ones, however some other may not",
"look at these questions and answer them, or review them to find out",
"because they are not closed as off-topic or duplicate. How can users be",
"opened? In my opinion, some of these questions are good ones, however some",
"to find unanswered questions on website and found about [141 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano) which have",
"take a look at these questions and answer them, or review them to",
"these questions are good ones, however some other may not be so good",
"duplicate. How can users be encouraged to take a look at these questions",
"are still open, these are the questions which seem to be on-topic on",
"answers and are still open, these are the questions which seem to be",
"of these questions reviewed to find out whether they are eligible to remain",
"whether they are eligible to remain opened? In my opinion, some of these",
"be on-topic on site because they are not closed as off-topic or duplicate.",
"of these questions are good ones, however some other may not be so",
"found about [141 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano) which have no answers and are still open, these",
"reviewed to find out whether they are eligible to remain opened? In my",
"are good ones, however some other may not be so good to remain",
"can users be encouraged to take a look at these questions and answer",
"they are eligible to remain opened? In my opinion, some of these questions",
"the questions which seem to be on-topic on site because they are not",
"eligible to remain opened? In my opinion, some of these questions are good",
"they are not closed as off-topic or duplicate. How can users be encouraged",
"good ones, however some other may not be so good to remain opened.",
"there duplicates of them available on website? Should some of these questions reviewed",
"which have no answers and are still open, these are the questions which",
"them, or review them to find out whether there duplicates of them available",
"find unanswered questions on website and found about [141 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano) which have no",
"questions on website and found about [141 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano) which have no answers and",
"out whether there duplicates of them available on website? Should some of these",
"about [141 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=answers%3A0%20closed%3Ano%20duplicate%3Ano) which have no answers and are still open, these are",
"on website? Should some of these questions reviewed to find out whether they",
"or review them to find out whether there duplicates of them available on",
"no answers and are still open, these are the questions which seem to",
"website? Should some of these questions reviewed to find out whether they are",
"my opinion, some of these questions are good ones, however some other may",
"and answer them, or review them to find out whether there duplicates of",
"these questions reviewed to find out whether they are eligible to remain opened?",
"questions reviewed to find out whether they are eligible to remain opened? In"
] |
[
"it has a lot to do with the impression that the OP's self-esteem",
"*more* community interest in such short time. The second point makes me think",
"maybe also somewhat of a rant. * However, the question has also garnered",
"a lot of responses: there are 32 upvotes (2 downvotes), 2000 views, 9",
"to salvage. However, I am not entirely sure what the golden core is",
"has been put on hold (with 5 community votes, no direct closing by",
"votes, no direct closing by a mod). I think given the tone and",
"is that makes this question more interesting to the community than all the",
"and many, many comments. We do not all that often have questions that",
"we usually close rather unceremoniously. I have the theory that it has a",
"rather unceremoniously. I have the theory that it has a lot to do",
"the tone and scope of the question as written, this is in line",
"*has to be* something relevant in this question, something that a good edit",
"that a good edit may be able to salvage. However, I am not",
"sure what the golden core is that makes this question more interesting to",
"status, but I am not sure. **What are your opinions on this question?**",
"* However, the question has also garnered a lot of responses: there are",
"are 32 upvotes (2 downvotes), 2000 views, 9 answers, and many, many comments.",
"than all the other *\"I hate grad school, shall I quit?\"* questions that",
"all that often have questions that trigger *more* community interest in such short",
"and scope of the question as written, this is in line with our",
"in line with our usual practices. One can argue that the question is",
"such short time. The second point makes me think that there *has to",
"question is currently all of unclear, opinion-based, and maybe also somewhat of a",
"be* something relevant in this question, something that a good edit may be",
"I have the theory that it has a lot to do with the",
"I see them): * The question has been put on hold (with 5",
"many, many comments. We do not all that often have questions that trigger",
"often have questions that trigger *more* community interest in such short time. The",
"this is in line with our usual practices. One can argue that the",
"quit?\"* questions that we usually close rather unceremoniously. I have the theory that",
"line with our usual practices. One can argue that the question is currently",
"question more interesting to the community than all the other *\"I hate grad",
"the question is currently all of unclear, opinion-based, and maybe also somewhat of",
"facts (as I see them): * The question has been put on hold",
"community votes, no direct closing by a mod). I think given the tone",
"of the question as written, this is in line with our usual practices.",
"32 upvotes (2 downvotes), 2000 views, 9 answers, and many, many comments. We",
"The second point makes me think that there *has to be* something relevant",
"trigger *more* community interest in such short time. The second point makes me",
"something relevant in this question, something that a good edit may be able",
"grad school, shall I quit?\"* questions that we usually close rather unceremoniously. I",
"the impression that the OP's self-esteem seems rather unhealthily tied to her grad",
"I am not entirely sure what the golden core is that makes this",
"OP's self-esteem seems rather unhealthily tied to her grad student status, but I",
"think that there *has to be* something relevant in this question, something that",
"shall I quit?\"* questions that we usually close rather unceremoniously. I have the",
"makes this question more interesting to the community than all the other *\"I",
"that the OP's self-esteem seems rather unhealthily tied to her grad student status,",
"that there *has to be* something relevant in this question, something that a",
"I quit?\"* questions that we usually close rather unceremoniously. I have the theory",
"of, the facts (as I see them): * The question has been put",
"think given the tone and scope of the question as written, this is",
"point makes me think that there *has to be* something relevant in this",
"her grad student status, but I am not sure. **What are your opinions",
"responses: there are 32 upvotes (2 downvotes), 2000 views, 9 answers, and many,",
"am not entirely sure what the golden core is that makes this question",
"all of unclear, opinion-based, and maybe also somewhat of a rant. * However,",
"theory that it has a lot to do with the impression that the",
"hold (with 5 community votes, no direct closing by a mod). I think",
"to do with the impression that the OP's self-esteem seems rather unhealthily tied",
"that we usually close rather unceremoniously. I have the theory that it has",
"rant. * However, the question has also garnered a lot of responses: there",
"student status, but I am not sure. **What are your opinions on this",
"salvage. However, I am not entirely sure what the golden core is that",
"have questions that trigger *more* community interest in such short time. The second",
"tone and scope of the question as written, this is in line with",
"of @Davidmh, I want to start a discussion about [this recently holded question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life)",
"somewhat of a rant. * However, the question has also garnered a lot",
"mod). I think given the tone and scope of the question as written,",
"and maybe also somewhat of a rant. * However, the question has also",
"that the question is currently all of unclear, opinion-based, and maybe also somewhat",
"We do not all that often have questions that trigger *more* community interest",
"the OP's self-esteem seems rather unhealthily tied to her grad student status, but",
"(with 5 community votes, no direct closing by a mod). I think given",
"a good edit may be able to salvage. However, I am not entirely",
"other *\"I hate grad school, shall I quit?\"* questions that we usually close",
"self-esteem seems rather unhealthily tied to her grad student status, but I am",
"rather unhealthily tied to her grad student status, but I am not sure.",
"a rant. * However, the question has also garnered a lot of responses:",
"(2 downvotes), 2000 views, 9 answers, and many, many comments. We do not",
"that trigger *more* community interest in such short time. The second point makes",
"of unclear, opinion-based, and maybe also somewhat of a rant. * However, the",
"the facts (as I see them): * The question has been put on",
"questions that we usually close rather unceremoniously. I have the theory that it",
"with the impression that the OP's self-esteem seems rather unhealthily tied to her",
"usually close rather unceremoniously. I have the theory that it has a lot",
"written, this is in line with our usual practices. One can argue that",
"seems rather unhealthily tied to her grad student status, but I am not",
"short time. The second point makes me think that there *has to be*",
"unceremoniously. I have the theory that it has a lot to do with",
"there *has to be* something relevant in this question, something that a good",
"do not all that often have questions that trigger *more* community interest in",
"hate grad school, shall I quit?\"* questions that we usually close rather unceremoniously.",
"to her grad student status, but I am not sure. **What are your",
"tied to her grad student status, but I am not sure. **What are",
"the other *\"I hate grad school, shall I quit?\"* questions that we usually",
"school, shall I quit?\"* questions that we usually close rather unceremoniously. I have",
"the question has also garnered a lot of responses: there are 32 upvotes",
"them): * The question has been put on hold (with 5 community votes,",
"that often have questions that trigger *more* community interest in such short time.",
"that it has a lot to do with the impression that the OP's",
"question, something that a good edit may be able to salvage. However, I",
"may be able to salvage. However, I am not entirely sure what the",
"direct closing by a mod). I think given the tone and scope of",
"I think given the tone and scope of the question as written, this",
"by a mod). I think given the tone and scope of the question",
"Following the suggestion of @Davidmh, I want to start a discussion about [this",
"interest in such short time. The second point makes me think that there",
"question as written, this is in line with our usual practices. One can",
"question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) First of, the facts (as I see them): * The question has",
"community interest in such short time. The second point makes me think that",
"do with the impression that the OP's self-esteem seems rather unhealthily tied to",
"this question, something that a good edit may be able to salvage. However,",
"is in line with our usual practices. One can argue that the question",
"of a rant. * However, the question has also garnered a lot of",
"closing by a mod). I think given the tone and scope of the",
"the theory that it has a lot to do with the impression that",
"about [this recently holded question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) First of, the facts (as I see them):",
"a lot to do with the impression that the OP's self-esteem seems rather",
"a mod). I think given the tone and scope of the question as",
"views, 9 answers, and many, many comments. We do not all that often",
"argue that the question is currently all of unclear, opinion-based, and maybe also",
"to be* something relevant in this question, something that a good edit may",
"recently holded question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) First of, the facts (as I see them): * The",
"start a discussion about [this recently holded question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) First of, the facts (as",
"holded question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) First of, the facts (as I see them): * The question",
"2000 views, 9 answers, and many, many comments. We do not all that",
"something that a good edit may be able to salvage. However, I am",
"of responses: there are 32 upvotes (2 downvotes), 2000 views, 9 answers, and",
"I want to start a discussion about [this recently holded question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) First of,",
"see them): * The question has been put on hold (with 5 community",
"to the community than all the other *\"I hate grad school, shall I",
"* The question has been put on hold (with 5 community votes, no",
"However, I am not entirely sure what the golden core is that makes",
"9 answers, and many, many comments. We do not all that often have",
"comments. We do not all that often have questions that trigger *more* community",
"is currently all of unclear, opinion-based, and maybe also somewhat of a rant.",
"upvotes (2 downvotes), 2000 views, 9 answers, and many, many comments. We do",
"opinion-based, and maybe also somewhat of a rant. * However, the question has",
"all the other *\"I hate grad school, shall I quit?\"* questions that we",
"with our usual practices. One can argue that the question is currently all",
"been put on hold (with 5 community votes, no direct closing by a",
"not entirely sure what the golden core is that makes this question more",
"(as I see them): * The question has been put on hold (with",
"core is that makes this question more interesting to the community than all",
"me think that there *has to be* something relevant in this question, something",
"5 community votes, no direct closing by a mod). I think given the",
"makes me think that there *has to be* something relevant in this question,",
"relevant in this question, something that a good edit may be able to",
"currently all of unclear, opinion-based, and maybe also somewhat of a rant. *",
"also somewhat of a rant. * However, the question has also garnered a",
"question has also garnered a lot of responses: there are 32 upvotes (2",
"the community than all the other *\"I hate grad school, shall I quit?\"*",
"answers, and many, many comments. We do not all that often have questions",
"First of, the facts (as I see them): * The question has been",
"the golden core is that makes this question more interesting to the community",
"our usual practices. One can argue that the question is currently all of",
"lot of responses: there are 32 upvotes (2 downvotes), 2000 views, 9 answers,",
"no direct closing by a mod). I think given the tone and scope",
"what the golden core is that makes this question more interesting to the",
"in this question, something that a good edit may be able to salvage.",
"interesting to the community than all the other *\"I hate grad school, shall",
"able to salvage. However, I am not entirely sure what the golden core",
"garnered a lot of responses: there are 32 upvotes (2 downvotes), 2000 views,",
"not all that often have questions that trigger *more* community interest in such",
"be able to salvage. However, I am not entirely sure what the golden",
"practices. One can argue that the question is currently all of unclear, opinion-based,",
"questions that trigger *more* community interest in such short time. The second point",
"has a lot to do with the impression that the OP's self-esteem seems",
"impression that the OP's self-esteem seems rather unhealthily tied to her grad student",
"downvotes), 2000 views, 9 answers, and many, many comments. We do not all",
"One can argue that the question is currently all of unclear, opinion-based, and",
"there are 32 upvotes (2 downvotes), 2000 views, 9 answers, and many, many",
"more interesting to the community than all the other *\"I hate grad school,",
"scope of the question as written, this is in line with our usual",
"have the theory that it has a lot to do with the impression",
"a discussion about [this recently holded question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) First of, the facts (as I",
"in such short time. The second point makes me think that there *has",
"the suggestion of @Davidmh, I want to start a discussion about [this recently",
"has also garnered a lot of responses: there are 32 upvotes (2 downvotes),",
"second point makes me think that there *has to be* something relevant in",
"question has been put on hold (with 5 community votes, no direct closing",
"want to start a discussion about [this recently holded question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) First of, the",
"unclear, opinion-based, and maybe also somewhat of a rant. * However, the question",
"that makes this question more interesting to the community than all the other",
"on hold (with 5 community votes, no direct closing by a mod). I",
"community than all the other *\"I hate grad school, shall I quit?\"* questions",
"lot to do with the impression that the OP's self-esteem seems rather unhealthily",
"the question as written, this is in line with our usual practices. One",
"golden core is that makes this question more interesting to the community than",
"discussion about [this recently holded question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) First of, the facts (as I see",
"usual practices. One can argue that the question is currently all of unclear,",
"can argue that the question is currently all of unclear, opinion-based, and maybe",
"The question has been put on hold (with 5 community votes, no direct",
"close rather unceremoniously. I have the theory that it has a lot to",
"[this recently holded question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) First of, the facts (as I see them): *",
"However, the question has also garnered a lot of responses: there are 32",
"many comments. We do not all that often have questions that trigger *more*",
"*\"I hate grad school, shall I quit?\"* questions that we usually close rather",
"@Davidmh, I want to start a discussion about [this recently holded question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) First",
"suggestion of @Davidmh, I want to start a discussion about [this recently holded",
"grad student status, but I am not sure. **What are your opinions on",
"put on hold (with 5 community votes, no direct closing by a mod).",
"time. The second point makes me think that there *has to be* something",
"this question more interesting to the community than all the other *\"I hate",
"edit may be able to salvage. However, I am not entirely sure what",
"entirely sure what the golden core is that makes this question more interesting",
"to start a discussion about [this recently holded question.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) First of, the facts",
"also garnered a lot of responses: there are 32 upvotes (2 downvotes), 2000",
"given the tone and scope of the question as written, this is in",
"unhealthily tied to her grad student status, but I am not sure. **What",
"as written, this is in line with our usual practices. One can argue",
"good edit may be able to salvage. However, I am not entirely sure"
] |
[
"Mathematics: the \"go and do something original!\" part. To be honest, as someone",
"that some valuable tips would certainly arise; but is this question too broad",
"possible, and that some valuable tips would certainly arise; but is this question",
"the large experience of the community members would make this possible, and that",
"I am sure there are many many people in my situation, I would",
"compiling a list of some of the most important things one can do",
"like \"work hard everyday\"; ideally, it would be more specific and helpful things.",
"the \"go and do something original!\" part. To be honest, as someone who",
"bit scared about it. As I am sure there are many many people",
"and helpful things. I am sure that the large experience of the community",
"situation, I would like to ask a question on Academia with the purpose",
"of the community members would make this possible, and that some valuable tips",
"part of my Ph.D in Mathematics: the \"go and do something original!\" part.",
"things. I am sure that the large experience of the community members would",
"a list of some of the most important things one can do to",
"important things one can do to increase the chances of succefully going through",
"be more specific and helpful things. I am sure that the large experience",
"large experience of the community members would make this possible, and that some",
"on Academia with the purpose of compiling a list of some of the",
"things one can do to increase the chances of succefully going through (and",
"it would be more specific and helpful things. I am sure that the",
"as someone who never did reseach before, I am a bit scared about",
"will be starting the most important part of my Ph.D in Mathematics: the",
"someone who never did reseach before, I am a bit scared about it.",
"be honest, as someone who never did reseach before, I am a bit",
"of compiling a list of some of the most important things one can",
"one can do to increase the chances of succefully going through (and completing)",
"things like \"work hard everyday\"; ideally, it would be more specific and helpful",
"helpful things. I am sure that the large experience of the community members",
"am sure that the large experience of the community members would make this",
"tips would certainly arise; but is this question too broad and/ or too",
"looking for general things like \"work hard everyday\"; ideally, it would be more",
"of the most important things one can do to increase the chances of",
"the purpose of compiling a list of some of the most important things",
"that the large experience of the community members would make this possible, and",
"ideally, it would be more specific and helpful things. I am sure that",
"purpose of compiling a list of some of the most important things one",
"community members would make this possible, and that some valuable tips would certainly",
"I will be starting the most important part of my Ph.D in Mathematics:",
"going through (and completing) a Ph.D. Of course, I am not looking for",
"through (and completing) a Ph.D. Of course, I am not looking for general",
"some of the most important things one can do to increase the chances",
"I am not looking for general things like \"work hard everyday\"; ideally, it",
"general things like \"work hard everyday\"; ideally, it would be more specific and",
"my situation, I would like to ask a question on Academia with the",
"completing) a Ph.D. Of course, I am not looking for general things like",
"of succefully going through (and completing) a Ph.D. Of course, I am not",
"it. As I am sure there are many many people in my situation,",
"there are many many people in my situation, I would like to ask",
"sure that the large experience of the community members would make this possible,",
"make this possible, and that some valuable tips would certainly arise; but is",
"a bit scared about it. As I am sure there are many many",
"would like to ask a question on Academia with the purpose of compiling",
"arise; but is this question too broad and/ or too opinion-based to fit",
"everyday\"; ideally, it would be more specific and helpful things. I am sure",
"question on Academia with the purpose of compiling a list of some of",
"a question on Academia with the purpose of compiling a list of some",
"the community members would make this possible, and that some valuable tips would",
"original!\" part. To be honest, as someone who never did reseach before, I",
"are many many people in my situation, I would like to ask a",
"be starting the most important part of my Ph.D in Mathematics: the \"go",
"to increase the chances of succefully going through (and completing) a Ph.D. Of",
"and do something original!\" part. To be honest, as someone who never did",
"experience of the community members would make this possible, and that some valuable",
"for general things like \"work hard everyday\"; ideally, it would be more specific",
"Next September I will be starting the most important part of my Ph.D",
"scared about it. As I am sure there are many many people in",
"but is this question too broad and/ or too opinion-based to fit here?",
"most important things one can do to increase the chances of succefully going",
"members would make this possible, and that some valuable tips would certainly arise;",
"would make this possible, and that some valuable tips would certainly arise; but",
"of some of the most important things one can do to increase the",
"with the purpose of compiling a list of some of the most important",
"can do to increase the chances of succefully going through (and completing) a",
"sure there are many many people in my situation, I would like to",
"important part of my Ph.D in Mathematics: the \"go and do something original!\"",
"the most important things one can do to increase the chances of succefully",
"do to increase the chances of succefully going through (and completing) a Ph.D.",
"hard everyday\"; ideally, it would be more specific and helpful things. I am",
"who never did reseach before, I am a bit scared about it. As",
"my Ph.D in Mathematics: the \"go and do something original!\" part. To be",
"a Ph.D. Of course, I am not looking for general things like \"work",
"honest, as someone who never did reseach before, I am a bit scared",
"list of some of the most important things one can do to increase",
"the most important part of my Ph.D in Mathematics: the \"go and do",
"To be honest, as someone who never did reseach before, I am a",
"of my Ph.D in Mathematics: the \"go and do something original!\" part. To",
"in Mathematics: the \"go and do something original!\" part. To be honest, as",
"Academia with the purpose of compiling a list of some of the most",
"starting the most important part of my Ph.D in Mathematics: the \"go and",
"I would like to ask a question on Academia with the purpose of",
"do something original!\" part. To be honest, as someone who never did reseach",
"did reseach before, I am a bit scared about it. As I am",
"the chances of succefully going through (and completing) a Ph.D. Of course, I",
"Ph.D. Of course, I am not looking for general things like \"work hard",
"increase the chances of succefully going through (and completing) a Ph.D. Of course,",
"something original!\" part. To be honest, as someone who never did reseach before,",
"(and completing) a Ph.D. Of course, I am not looking for general things",
"people in my situation, I would like to ask a question on Academia",
"I am a bit scared about it. As I am sure there are",
"As I am sure there are many many people in my situation, I",
"many people in my situation, I would like to ask a question on",
"and that some valuable tips would certainly arise; but is this question too",
"certainly arise; but is this question too broad and/ or too opinion-based to",
"this possible, and that some valuable tips would certainly arise; but is this",
"valuable tips would certainly arise; but is this question too broad and/ or",
"\"work hard everyday\"; ideally, it would be more specific and helpful things. I",
"to ask a question on Academia with the purpose of compiling a list",
"not looking for general things like \"work hard everyday\"; ideally, it would be",
"am a bit scared about it. As I am sure there are many",
"September I will be starting the most important part of my Ph.D in",
"am sure there are many many people in my situation, I would like",
"about it. As I am sure there are many many people in my",
"course, I am not looking for general things like \"work hard everyday\"; ideally,",
"Ph.D in Mathematics: the \"go and do something original!\" part. To be honest,",
"never did reseach before, I am a bit scared about it. As I",
"more specific and helpful things. I am sure that the large experience of",
"part. To be honest, as someone who never did reseach before, I am",
"would be more specific and helpful things. I am sure that the large",
"many many people in my situation, I would like to ask a question",
"reseach before, I am a bit scared about it. As I am sure",
"am not looking for general things like \"work hard everyday\"; ideally, it would",
"succefully going through (and completing) a Ph.D. Of course, I am not looking",
"I am sure that the large experience of the community members would make",
"before, I am a bit scared about it. As I am sure there",
"in my situation, I would like to ask a question on Academia with",
"Of course, I am not looking for general things like \"work hard everyday\";",
"would certainly arise; but is this question too broad and/ or too opinion-based",
"most important part of my Ph.D in Mathematics: the \"go and do something",
"chances of succefully going through (and completing) a Ph.D. Of course, I am",
"ask a question on Academia with the purpose of compiling a list of",
"like to ask a question on Academia with the purpose of compiling a",
"specific and helpful things. I am sure that the large experience of the",
"some valuable tips would certainly arise; but is this question too broad and/",
"\"go and do something original!\" part. To be honest, as someone who never"
] |
[
"student who was unproductive due to clinical depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643) * [How to overcome feeling",
"always make me uncomfortable, because they are often borderline off-topic and I sometimes",
"and was shocked to see how frequent they were. Does anyone else finds",
"were. Does anyone else finds it surprising? Is it just an artifact, or",
"OP mention their clinical depression always make me uncomfortable, because they are often",
"does our site somehow *attract* depressed peoples? Despite what some say, I'm unconvinced",
"an \"appropriate\" level of angst to go through with a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643) * [Graduate",
"bring up the health issues that caused it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643) * [If I have an",
"a school should I ever go back there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643) * ... Borderline questions: *",
"unsuccessful PhD (because of others' fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643) * [Is it possible to recover after",
"a career setback such as this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643) * [Should I leave my PhD in",
"site somehow *attract* depressed peoples? Despite what some say, I'm unconvinced that the",
"usual. I'm ready to change my mind when confronted to hard evidence of",
"... Borderline questions: * [Career advice: How can I move on from my",
"artifact, or does our site somehow *attract* depressed peoples? Despite what some say,",
"[What do I do as a depressed and incompetent TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643) * [Overcoming depression",
"part of a community that does that. So I'm interested in your opinions",
"dismissal from a school should I ever go back there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643) * ... Borderline",
"clinical depression: * [What do I do as a depressed and incompetent TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643)",
"a student who was unproductive due to clinical depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643) * [How to overcome",
"on random internet posts to handle serious nervous issues and don't want to",
"offer or delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643) * [Thinking about leaving a master's program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643) * [Applying to",
"from a school should I ever go back there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643) * ... Borderline questions:",
"* [If I have an academic dismissal from a school should I ever",
"[Should a postdoc talk about his depression with his mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643) * [Would most",
"that the prevalence of clinical depression amongst academics is higher than usual. I'm",
"feeling that published articles lack public interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643) * [What to do if one",
"depressed peoples? Despite what some say, I'm unconvinced that the prevalence of clinical",
"an academic dismissal from a school should I ever go back there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643) *",
"of powerlessness on a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my",
"Questions where OP mention their clinical depression always make me uncomfortable, because they",
"serious nervous issues and don't want to be a part of a community",
"evidence of the contrary. Questions where OP mention their clinical depression always make",
"Is it just an artifact, or does our site somehow *attract* depressed peoples?",
"back there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643) * ... Borderline questions: * [Career advice: How can I move",
"(because of others' fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643) * [Is it possible to recover after a career",
"* [Should a postdoc talk about his depression with his mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643) * [Would",
"Does anyone else finds it surprising? Is it just an artifact, or does",
"because they are often borderline off-topic and I sometimes don't have the hart",
"do I do as a depressed and incompetent TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643) * [Overcoming depression and",
"life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643) * [How to cope with feelings of powerlessness on a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643) *",
"to overcome feeling that published articles lack public interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643) * [What to do",
"as this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643) * [Should I leave my PhD in year 6 or just",
"can I move on from my probable PhD flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643) * [Should I quit",
"hand I really think it's a bad idea to rely on random internet",
"* [Would most PhD supervisors stop working with a student who was unproductive",
"of angst to go through with a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643) * [Graduate without a job",
"Despite what some say, I'm unconvinced that the prevalence of clinical depression amongst",
"with his mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643) * [Would most PhD supervisors stop working with a student",
"6 or just take a bit of a leave and try to regroup?/",
"prevalence of clinical depression amongst academics is higher than usual. I'm ready to",
"are often borderline off-topic and I sometimes don't have the hart to mention",
"finds it surprising? Is it just an artifact, or does our site somehow",
"uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study a valid reason to drop out",
"make me uncomfortable, because they are often borderline off-topic and I sometimes don't",
"caused it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643) * [If I have an academic dismissal from a school should",
"mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643) * [Would most PhD supervisors stop working with a student who was",
"random internet posts to handle serious nervous issues and don't want to be",
"PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643) * [How to cope with feelings",
"advice: How can I move on from my probable PhD flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643) * [Should",
"due to clinical depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643) * [How to overcome feeling that published articles lack",
"interested in your opinions about it. Should we do specific things in terms",
"think it's a bad idea to rely on random internet posts to handle",
"they are often borderline off-topic and I sometimes don't have the hart to",
"fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643) * [Is it possible to recover after a career setback such as",
"I'm unconvinced that the prevalence of clinical depression amongst academics is higher than",
"simple Google search for instances of the word 'depression' on this site, and",
"that does that. So I'm interested in your opinions about it. Should we",
"there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643) * ... Borderline questions: * [Career advice: How can I move on",
"but reluctant to bring up the health issues that caused it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643) * [If",
"this site, and was shocked to see how frequent they were. Does anyone",
"published articles lack public interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643) * [What to do if one has had",
"[Thinking about leaving a master's program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643) * [Applying to grad school for mathematics",
"angst to go through with a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643) * [Graduate without a job offer",
"mathematics with low GPA, but reluctant to bring up the health issues that",
"Explicit mention of clinical depression: * [What do I do as a depressed",
"and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study a valid reason to drop",
"instances of the word 'depression' on this site, and was shocked to see",
"incompetent TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643) * [Overcoming depression and getting back on rails with PhD work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643)",
"we do specific things in terms of moderation, or do we need a",
"probable PhD flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643) * [Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and",
"flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643) * [Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643)",
"for instances of the word 'depression' on this site, and was shocked to",
"to do if one has had an unsuccessful PhD (because of others' fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643)",
"What is an \"appropriate\" level of angst to go through with a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643)",
"work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643) * [Should a postdoc talk about his depression with his mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643) *",
"PhD work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643) * [Should a postdoc talk about his depression with his mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643)",
"that caused it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643) * [If I have an academic dismissal from a school",
"* [Thinking about leaving a master's program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643) * [Applying to grad school for",
"my probable PhD flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643) * [Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem",
"else finds it surprising? Is it just an artifact, or does our site",
"posts to handle serious nervous issues and don't want to be a part",
"do if one has had an unsuccessful PhD (because of others' fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643) *",
"--- List of question mentioning depression (I stopped after 2 pages of search",
"depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643) * [How to overcome feeling that published articles lack public interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643) *",
"public interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643) * [What to do if one has had an unsuccessful PhD",
"this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643) * [Should I leave my PhD in year 6 or just take",
"[If I have an academic dismissal from a school should I ever go",
"to handle serious nervous issues and don't want to be a part of",
"stop working with a student who was unproductive due to clinical depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643) *",
"* [Is it possible to recover after a career setback such as this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643)",
"with PhD work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643) * [Should a postdoc talk about his depression with his",
"interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643) * [What to do if one has had an unsuccessful PhD (because",
"year 6 or just take a bit of a leave and try to",
"hart to mention it. On the other hand I really think it's a",
"hard evidence of the contrary. Questions where OP mention their clinical depression always",
"feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study a valid reason",
"on rails with PhD work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643) * [Should a postdoc talk about his depression",
"[Career advice: How can I move on from my probable PhD flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643) *",
"specific things in terms of moderation, or do we need a tag for",
"self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643) * [How to cope with feelings of powerlessness on",
"GPA, but reluctant to bring up the health issues that caused it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643) *",
"I ever go back there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643) * ... Borderline questions: * [Career advice: How",
"of the word 'depression' on this site, and was shocked to see how",
"or do we need a tag for it? --- List of question mentioning",
"shocked to see how frequent they were. Does anyone else finds it surprising?",
"does that. So I'm interested in your opinions about it. Should we do",
"tag for it? --- List of question mentioning depression (I stopped after 2",
"was unproductive due to clinical depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643) * [How to overcome feeling that published",
"[Overcoming depression and getting back on rails with PhD work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643) * [Should a",
"a community that does that. So I'm interested in your opinions about it.",
"such as this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643) * [Should I leave my PhD in year 6 or",
"postdoc talk about his depression with his mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643) * [Would most PhD supervisors",
"bit of a leave and try to regroup?/ What is an \"appropriate\" level",
"my (foreign) country of study a valid reason to drop out of a",
"[Should I leave my PhD in year 6 or just take a bit",
"it possible to recover after a career setback such as this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643) * [Should",
"a postdoc talk about his depression with his mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643) * [Would most PhD",
"a bad idea to rely on random internet posts to handle serious nervous",
"getting back on rails with PhD work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643) * [Should a postdoc talk about",
"bad idea to rely on random internet posts to handle serious nervous issues",
"a simple Google search for instances of the word 'depression' on this site,",
"we need a tag for it? --- List of question mentioning depression (I",
"I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643) * [How to",
"overcome feeling that published articles lack public interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643) * [What to do if",
"moderation, or do we need a tag for it? --- List of question",
"(foreign) country of study a valid reason to drop out of a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/35352/10643)",
"with feelings of powerlessness on a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable",
"master's program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643) * [Applying to grad school for mathematics with low GPA, but",
"through with a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643) * [Graduate without a job offer or delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643) *",
"question mentioning depression (I stopped after 2 pages of search results) Explicit mention",
"do we need a tag for it? --- List of question mentioning depression",
"handle serious nervous issues and don't want to be a part of a",
"that. So I'm interested in your opinions about it. Should we do specific",
"clinical depression always make me uncomfortable, because they are often borderline off-topic and",
"program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643) * [Applying to grad school for mathematics with low GPA, but reluctant",
"who was unproductive due to clinical depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643) * [How to overcome feeling that",
"PhD flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643) * [Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social",
"unconvinced that the prevalence of clinical depression amongst academics is higher than usual.",
"depression and getting back on rails with PhD work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643) * [Should a postdoc",
"clinical depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643) * [How to overcome feeling that published articles lack public interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643)",
"I have an academic dismissal from a school should I ever go back",
"back on rails with PhD work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643) * [Should a postdoc talk about his",
"or does our site somehow *attract* depressed peoples? Despite what some say, I'm",
"don't want to be a part of a community that does that. So",
"for mathematics with low GPA, but reluctant to bring up the health issues",
"site, and was shocked to see how frequent they were. Does anyone else",
"a depressed and incompetent TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643) * [Overcoming depression and getting back on rails",
"of others' fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643) * [Is it possible to recover after a career setback",
"grad school for mathematics with low GPA, but reluctant to bring up the",
"or just take a bit of a leave and try to regroup?/ What",
"a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of",
"higher than usual. I'm ready to change my mind when confronted to hard",
"if one has had an unsuccessful PhD (because of others' fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643) * [Is",
"to go through with a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643) * [Graduate without a job offer or",
"community that does that. So I'm interested in your opinions about it. Should",
"to grad school for mathematics with low GPA, but reluctant to bring up",
"recently ran a simple Google search for instances of the word 'depression' on",
"Borderline questions: * [Career advice: How can I move on from my probable",
"* [Graduate without a job offer or delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643) * [Thinking about leaving a",
"I'm ready to change my mind when confronted to hard evidence of the",
"to regroup?/ What is an \"appropriate\" level of angst to go through with",
"often borderline off-topic and I sometimes don't have the hart to mention it.",
"delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643) * [Thinking about leaving a master's program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643) * [Applying to grad school",
"* [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study a",
"an artifact, or does our site somehow *attract* depressed peoples? Despite what some",
"about leaving a master's program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643) * [Applying to grad school for mathematics with",
"your opinions about it. Should we do specific things in terms of moderation,",
"\"appropriate\" level of angst to go through with a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643) * [Graduate without",
"* [Overcoming depression and getting back on rails with PhD work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643) * [Should",
"How can I move on from my probable PhD flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643) * [Should I",
"I really think it's a bad idea to rely on random internet posts",
"regroup?/ What is an \"appropriate\" level of angst to go through with a",
"of clinical depression amongst academics is higher than usual. I'm ready to change",
"* [Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643) *",
"after 2 pages of search results) Explicit mention of clinical depression: * [What",
"try to regroup?/ What is an \"appropriate\" level of angst to go through",
"what some say, I'm unconvinced that the prevalence of clinical depression amongst academics",
"how frequent they were. Does anyone else finds it surprising? Is it just",
"in my (foreign) country of study a valid reason to drop out of",
"[How to cope with feelings of powerlessness on a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643) * [Is feeling",
"don't have the hart to mention it. On the other hand I really",
"a tag for it? --- List of question mentioning depression (I stopped after",
"job offer or delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643) * [Thinking about leaving a master's program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643) * [Applying",
"take a bit of a leave and try to regroup?/ What is an",
"the hart to mention it. On the other hand I really think it's",
"issues that caused it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643) * [If I have an academic dismissal from a",
"and I sometimes don't have the hart to mention it. On the other",
"that published articles lack public interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643) * [What to do if one has",
"as a depressed and incompetent TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643) * [Overcoming depression and getting back on",
"[Graduate without a job offer or delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643) * [Thinking about leaving a master's",
"go back there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643) * ... Borderline questions: * [Career advice: How can I",
"with a student who was unproductive due to clinical depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643) * [How to",
"has had an unsuccessful PhD (because of others' fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643) * [Is it possible",
"school should I ever go back there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643) * ... Borderline questions: * [Career",
"search for instances of the word 'depression' on this site, and was shocked",
"to mention it. On the other hand I really think it's a bad",
"questions: * [Career advice: How can I move on from my probable PhD",
"On the other hand I really think it's a bad idea to rely",
"want to be a part of a community that does that. So I'm",
"leave and try to regroup?/ What is an \"appropriate\" level of angst to",
"* [How to cope with feelings of powerlessness on a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643) * [Is",
"things in terms of moderation, or do we need a tag for it?",
"[Would most PhD supervisors stop working with a student who was unproductive due",
"workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643) * [How to cope with feelings of powerlessness",
"for it? --- List of question mentioning depression (I stopped after 2 pages",
"[How to overcome feeling that published articles lack public interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643) * [What to",
"PhD supervisors stop working with a student who was unproductive due to clinical",
"level of angst to go through with a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643) * [Graduate without a",
"List of question mentioning depression (I stopped after 2 pages of search results)",
"with low GPA, but reluctant to bring up the health issues that caused",
"my PhD in year 6 or just take a bit of a leave",
"supervisors stop working with a student who was unproductive due to clinical depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643)",
"* [Should I leave my PhD in year 6 or just take a",
"word 'depression' on this site, and was shocked to see how frequent they",
"about his depression with his mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643) * [Would most PhD supervisors stop working",
"I do as a depressed and incompetent TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643) * [Overcoming depression and getting",
"just take a bit of a leave and try to regroup?/ What is",
"mention of clinical depression: * [What do I do as a depressed and",
"and incompetent TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643) * [Overcoming depression and getting back on rails with PhD",
"PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643) * [Graduate without a job offer or delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643) * [Thinking about leaving",
"[What to do if one has had an unsuccessful PhD (because of others'",
"mention it. On the other hand I really think it's a bad idea",
"their clinical depression always make me uncomfortable, because they are often borderline off-topic",
"I recently ran a simple Google search for instances of the word 'depression'",
"leave my PhD in year 6 or just take a bit of a",
"from my probable PhD flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643) * [Should I quit my PhD - workload,",
"depression always make me uncomfortable, because they are often borderline off-topic and I",
"depressed and incompetent TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643) * [Overcoming depression and getting back on rails with",
"pages of search results) Explicit mention of clinical depression: * [What do I",
"surprising? Is it just an artifact, or does our site somehow *attract* depressed",
"they were. Does anyone else finds it surprising? Is it just an artifact,",
"amongst academics is higher than usual. I'm ready to change my mind when",
"* ... Borderline questions: * [Career advice: How can I move on from",
"I leave my PhD in year 6 or just take a bit of",
"to see how frequent they were. Does anyone else finds it surprising? Is",
"*attract* depressed peoples? Despite what some say, I'm unconvinced that the prevalence of",
"Should we do specific things in terms of moderation, or do we need",
"it. On the other hand I really think it's a bad idea to",
"where OP mention their clinical depression always make me uncomfortable, because they are",
"cope with feelings of powerlessness on a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643) * [Is feeling lonely and",
"terms of moderation, or do we need a tag for it? --- List",
"to clinical depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643) * [How to overcome feeling that published articles lack public",
"it surprising? Is it just an artifact, or does our site somehow *attract*",
"to rely on random internet posts to handle serious nervous issues and don't",
"most PhD supervisors stop working with a student who was unproductive due to",
"possible to recover after a career setback such as this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643) * [Should I",
"need a tag for it? --- List of question mentioning depression (I stopped",
"opinions about it. Should we do specific things in terms of moderation, or",
"contrary. Questions where OP mention their clinical depression always make me uncomfortable, because",
"it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643) * [If I have an academic dismissal from a school should I",
"just an artifact, or does our site somehow *attract* depressed peoples? Despite what",
"depression (I stopped after 2 pages of search results) Explicit mention of clinical",
"others' fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643) * [Is it possible to recover after a career setback such",
"working with a student who was unproductive due to clinical depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643) * [How",
"to recover after a career setback such as this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643) * [Should I leave",
"say, I'm unconvinced that the prevalence of clinical depression amongst academics is higher",
"a bit of a leave and try to regroup?/ What is an \"appropriate\"",
"borderline off-topic and I sometimes don't have the hart to mention it. On",
"I sometimes don't have the hart to mention it. On the other hand",
"ran a simple Google search for instances of the word 'depression' on this",
"or delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643) * [Thinking about leaving a master's program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643) * [Applying to grad",
"of moderation, or do we need a tag for it? --- List of",
"should I ever go back there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643) * ... Borderline questions: * [Career advice:",
"my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643) * [How to cope with",
"a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643) * [Graduate without a job offer or delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643) * [Thinking about",
"[Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study a valid",
"really think it's a bad idea to rely on random internet posts to",
"had an unsuccessful PhD (because of others' fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643) * [Is it possible to",
"and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643) * [How to cope with feelings of powerlessness on a",
"in terms of moderation, or do we need a tag for it? ---",
"the other hand I really think it's a bad idea to rely on",
"than usual. I'm ready to change my mind when confronted to hard evidence",
"confronted to hard evidence of the contrary. Questions where OP mention their clinical",
"school for mathematics with low GPA, but reluctant to bring up the health",
"quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643) * [How to cope",
"PhD (because of others' fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643) * [Is it possible to recover after a",
"results) Explicit mention of clinical depression: * [What do I do as a",
"do as a depressed and incompetent TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643) * [Overcoming depression and getting back",
"his depression with his mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643) * [Would most PhD supervisors stop working with",
"* [What to do if one has had an unsuccessful PhD (because of",
"about it. Should we do specific things in terms of moderation, or do",
"our site somehow *attract* depressed peoples? Despite what some say, I'm unconvinced that",
"* [Career advice: How can I move on from my probable PhD flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643)",
"talk about his depression with his mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643) * [Would most PhD supervisors stop",
"recover after a career setback such as this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643) * [Should I leave my",
"somehow *attract* depressed peoples? Despite what some say, I'm unconvinced that the prevalence",
"academics is higher than usual. I'm ready to change my mind when confronted",
"mention their clinical depression always make me uncomfortable, because they are often borderline",
"reluctant to bring up the health issues that caused it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643) * [If I",
"of clinical depression: * [What do I do as a depressed and incompetent",
"lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study a valid reason to",
"some say, I'm unconvinced that the prevalence of clinical depression amongst academics is",
"mentioning depression (I stopped after 2 pages of search results) Explicit mention of",
"the word 'depression' on this site, and was shocked to see how frequent",
"low GPA, but reluctant to bring up the health issues that caused it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643)",
"clinical depression amongst academics is higher than usual. I'm ready to change my",
"internet posts to handle serious nervous issues and don't want to be a",
"after a career setback such as this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643) * [Should I leave my PhD",
"to bring up the health issues that caused it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643) * [If I have",
"health issues that caused it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643) * [If I have an academic dismissal from",
"off-topic and I sometimes don't have the hart to mention it. On the",
"feelings of powerlessness on a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in",
"see how frequent they were. Does anyone else finds it surprising? Is it",
"mind when confronted to hard evidence of the contrary. Questions where OP mention",
"a part of a community that does that. So I'm interested in your",
"an unsuccessful PhD (because of others' fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643) * [Is it possible to recover",
"the prevalence of clinical depression amongst academics is higher than usual. I'm ready",
"on from my probable PhD flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643) * [Should I quit my PhD -",
"on a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country",
"- workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643) * [How to cope with feelings of",
"without a job offer or delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643) * [Thinking about leaving a master's program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643)",
"* [How to overcome feeling that published articles lack public interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643) * [What",
"is higher than usual. I'm ready to change my mind when confronted to",
"of a leave and try to regroup?/ What is an \"appropriate\" level of",
"ready to change my mind when confronted to hard evidence of the contrary.",
"academic dismissal from a school should I ever go back there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643) * ...",
"it just an artifact, or does our site somehow *attract* depressed peoples? Despite",
"rely on random internet posts to handle serious nervous issues and don't want",
"of the contrary. Questions where OP mention their clinical depression always make me",
"2 pages of search results) Explicit mention of clinical depression: * [What do",
"have an academic dismissal from a school should I ever go back there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643)",
"me uncomfortable, because they are often borderline off-topic and I sometimes don't have",
"in year 6 or just take a bit of a leave and try",
"move on from my probable PhD flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643) * [Should I quit my PhD",
"be a part of a community that does that. So I'm interested in",
"his mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643) * [Would most PhD supervisors stop working with a student who",
"a job offer or delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643) * [Thinking about leaving a master's program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643) *",
"it? --- List of question mentioning depression (I stopped after 2 pages of",
"and getting back on rails with PhD work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643) * [Should a postdoc talk",
"one has had an unsuccessful PhD (because of others' fault)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/7293/10643) * [Is it",
"[Is it possible to recover after a career setback such as this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643) *",
"up the health issues that caused it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643) * [If I have an academic",
"is an \"appropriate\" level of angst to go through with a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643) *",
"So I'm interested in your opinions about it. Should we do specific things",
"articles lack public interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643) * [What to do if one has had an",
"setback such as this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643) * [Should I leave my PhD in year 6",
"to cope with feelings of powerlessness on a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643) * [Is feeling lonely",
"Google search for instances of the word 'depression' on this site, and was",
"sometimes don't have the hart to mention it. On the other hand I",
"social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643) * [How to cope with feelings of powerlessness on a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643)",
"TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643) * [Overcoming depression and getting back on rails with PhD work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643) *",
"when confronted to hard evidence of the contrary. Questions where OP mention their",
"other hand I really think it's a bad idea to rely on random",
"peoples? Despite what some say, I'm unconvinced that the prevalence of clinical depression",
"and don't want to be a part of a community that does that.",
"the contrary. Questions where OP mention their clinical depression always make me uncomfortable,",
"on this site, and was shocked to see how frequent they were. Does",
"uncomfortable, because they are often borderline off-topic and I sometimes don't have the",
"in your opinions about it. Should we do specific things in terms of",
"(I stopped after 2 pages of search results) Explicit mention of clinical depression:",
"unproductive due to clinical depression?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/37327/10643) * [How to overcome feeling that published articles",
"go through with a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643) * [Graduate without a job offer or delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643)",
"rails with PhD work](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28257/10643) * [Should a postdoc talk about his depression with",
"depression amongst academics is higher than usual. I'm ready to change my mind",
"to change my mind when confronted to hard evidence of the contrary. Questions",
"it. Should we do specific things in terms of moderation, or do we",
"frequent they were. Does anyone else finds it surprising? Is it just an",
"of search results) Explicit mention of clinical depression: * [What do I do",
"ever go back there?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18082/10643) * ... Borderline questions: * [Career advice: How can",
"it's a bad idea to rely on random internet posts to handle serious",
"I'm interested in your opinions about it. Should we do specific things in",
"'depression' on this site, and was shocked to see how frequent they were.",
"the health issues that caused it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/29085/10643) * [If I have an academic dismissal",
"leaving a master's program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643) * [Applying to grad school for mathematics with low",
"nervous issues and don't want to be a part of a community that",
"idea to rely on random internet posts to handle serious nervous issues and",
"a leave and try to regroup?/ What is an \"appropriate\" level of angst",
"PhD in year 6 or just take a bit of a leave and",
"depression: * [What do I do as a depressed and incompetent TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643) *",
"search results) Explicit mention of clinical depression: * [What do I do as",
"with a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/13133/10643) * [Graduate without a job offer or delay](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34963/10643) * [Thinking",
"powerlessness on a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign)",
"stopped after 2 pages of search results) Explicit mention of clinical depression: *",
"[Applying to grad school for mathematics with low GPA, but reluctant to bring",
"was shocked to see how frequent they were. Does anyone else finds it",
"* [Applying to grad school for mathematics with low GPA, but reluctant to",
"of question mentioning depression (I stopped after 2 pages of search results) Explicit",
"have the hart to mention it. On the other hand I really think",
"issues and don't want to be a part of a community that does",
"of a community that does that. So I'm interested in your opinions about",
"anyone else finds it surprising? Is it just an artifact, or does our",
"change my mind when confronted to hard evidence of the contrary. Questions where",
"a master's program](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/21089/10643) * [Applying to grad school for mathematics with low GPA,",
"to be a part of a community that does that. So I'm interested",
"and try to regroup?/ What is an \"appropriate\" level of angst to go",
"do specific things in terms of moderation, or do we need a tag",
"PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38217/10643) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study",
"my mind when confronted to hard evidence of the contrary. Questions where OP",
"* [What do I do as a depressed and incompetent TA?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/40739/10643) * [Overcoming",
"[Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/39017/10643) * [How",
"lack public interest?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32562/10643) * [What to do if one has had an unsuccessful",
"depression with his mentor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31855/10643) * [Would most PhD supervisors stop working with a",
"career setback such as this?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10381/10643) * [Should I leave my PhD in year",
"to hard evidence of the contrary. Questions where OP mention their clinical depression",
"I move on from my probable PhD flop?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/33032/10643) * [Should I quit my"
] |
[
"advice. Other sites in the network try hard to channel questions away from",
"hard to see how this is other than a request for personal advice.",
"sites in the network try hard to channel questions away from personal specificity",
"I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life). It is hard",
"social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life). It is hard to see how this is other than a",
"specificity towards more general interest. Is that the intent here? If not, why",
"a request for personal advice. Other sites in the network try hard to",
"hard to channel questions away from personal specificity towards more general interest. Is",
"request for personal advice. Other sites in the network try hard to channel",
"than a request for personal advice. Other sites in the network try hard",
"see how this is other than a request for personal advice. Other sites",
"for personal advice. Other sites in the network try hard to channel questions",
"to see how this is other than a request for personal advice. Other",
"from personal specificity towards more general interest. Is that the intent here? If",
"my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life). It is hard to see",
"personal advice. Other sites in the network try hard to channel questions away",
"It is hard to see how this is other than a request for",
"the network try hard to channel questions away from personal specificity towards more",
"towards more general interest. Is that the intent here? If not, why not?",
"channel questions away from personal specificity towards more general interest. Is that the",
"try hard to channel questions away from personal specificity towards more general interest.",
"life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life). It is hard to see how this is other than a request",
"self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life). It is hard to see how this is other",
"quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life). It is hard to",
"away from personal specificity towards more general interest. Is that the intent here?",
"how this is other than a request for personal advice. Other sites in",
"- workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life). It is hard to see how this",
"questions away from personal specificity towards more general interest. Is that the intent",
"workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life). It is hard to see how this is",
"personal specificity towards more general interest. Is that the intent here? If not,",
"is hard to see how this is other than a request for personal",
"Consider [Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life). It",
"is other than a request for personal advice. Other sites in the network",
"this is other than a request for personal advice. Other sites in the",
"to channel questions away from personal specificity towards more general interest. Is that",
"network try hard to channel questions away from personal specificity towards more general",
"in the network try hard to channel questions away from personal specificity towards",
"[Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life). It is",
"Other sites in the network try hard to channel questions away from personal",
"other than a request for personal advice. Other sites in the network try",
"PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life). It is hard to see how",
"and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life). It is hard to see how this is other than"
] |
[
"sites in the future If you see any bugs please let us know.",
"us to: * Have sharper / more beautiful design on retina displays *",
"of our sites in the future If you see any bugs please let",
"allow us to: * Have sharper / more beautiful design on retina displays",
"designer at Stack Exchange who made the design of this site. You may",
"all of our sites in the future If you see any bugs please",
"base css framework (the code which display the design). The updates allow us",
"retina displays * Fix layout bugs * More easily add new features to",
"is Stéphane and I'm the designer at Stack Exchange who made the design",
"layout bugs * More easily add new features to all of our sites",
"My name is Stéphane and I'm the designer at Stack Exchange who made",
"Have sharper / more beautiful design on retina displays * Fix layout bugs",
"the design lately. The updates are part of a SE network-wide update to",
"sharper / more beautiful design on retina displays * Fix layout bugs *",
"code which display the design). The updates allow us to: * Have sharper",
"a SE network-wide update to a new base css framework (the code which",
"to all of our sites in the future If you see any bugs",
"may have noticed some updates to the design lately. The updates are part",
"The updates allow us to: * Have sharper / more beautiful design on",
"displays * Fix layout bugs * More easily add new features to all",
"design lately. The updates are part of a SE network-wide update to a",
"design on retina displays * Fix layout bugs * More easily add new",
"to: * Have sharper / more beautiful design on retina displays * Fix",
"/ more beautiful design on retina displays * Fix layout bugs * More",
"part of a SE network-wide update to a new base css framework (the",
"You may have noticed some updates to the design lately. The updates are",
"in the future If you see any bugs please let us know. Thanks!",
"made the design of this site. You may have noticed some updates to",
"framework (the code which display the design). The updates allow us to: *",
"new base css framework (the code which display the design). The updates allow",
"which display the design). The updates allow us to: * Have sharper /",
"the designer at Stack Exchange who made the design of this site. You",
"Stéphane and I'm the designer at Stack Exchange who made the design of",
"some updates to the design lately. The updates are part of a SE",
"SE network-wide update to a new base css framework (the code which display",
"updates to the design lately. The updates are part of a SE network-wide",
"* More easily add new features to all of our sites in the",
"update to a new base css framework (the code which display the design).",
"features to all of our sites in the future If you see any",
"more beautiful design on retina displays * Fix layout bugs * More easily",
"who made the design of this site. You may have noticed some updates",
"I'm the designer at Stack Exchange who made the design of this site.",
"new features to all of our sites in the future If you see",
"the design). The updates allow us to: * Have sharper / more beautiful",
"this site. You may have noticed some updates to the design lately. The",
"name is Stéphane and I'm the designer at Stack Exchange who made the",
"to a new base css framework (the code which display the design). The",
"easily add new features to all of our sites in the future If",
"at Stack Exchange who made the design of this site. You may have",
"design of this site. You may have noticed some updates to the design",
"The updates are part of a SE network-wide update to a new base",
"display the design). The updates allow us to: * Have sharper / more",
"our sites in the future If you see any bugs please let us",
"(the code which display the design). The updates allow us to: * Have",
"add new features to all of our sites in the future If you",
"bugs * More easily add new features to all of our sites in",
"and I'm the designer at Stack Exchange who made the design of this",
"noticed some updates to the design lately. The updates are part of a",
"network-wide update to a new base css framework (the code which display the",
"design). The updates allow us to: * Have sharper / more beautiful design",
"css framework (the code which display the design). The updates allow us to:",
"of this site. You may have noticed some updates to the design lately.",
"More easily add new features to all of our sites in the future",
"of a SE network-wide update to a new base css framework (the code",
"updates are part of a SE network-wide update to a new base css",
"the design of this site. You may have noticed some updates to the",
"to the design lately. The updates are part of a SE network-wide update",
"on retina displays * Fix layout bugs * More easily add new features",
"* Have sharper / more beautiful design on retina displays * Fix layout",
"updates allow us to: * Have sharper / more beautiful design on retina",
"* Fix layout bugs * More easily add new features to all of",
"lately. The updates are part of a SE network-wide update to a new",
"Exchange who made the design of this site. You may have noticed some",
"a new base css framework (the code which display the design). The updates",
"Fix layout bugs * More easily add new features to all of our",
"beautiful design on retina displays * Fix layout bugs * More easily add",
"site. You may have noticed some updates to the design lately. The updates",
"have noticed some updates to the design lately. The updates are part of",
"Stack Exchange who made the design of this site. You may have noticed",
"are part of a SE network-wide update to a new base css framework"
] |
[
"migrated just because it's a good fit elsewhere. It only gets migrated if",
"doesn't get migrated just because it's a good fit elsewhere. It only gets",
"But instead of being here, where it will be seen by hundreds of",
"whole Stack Exchange, a question doesn't get migrated just because it's a good",
"it there, I'd have asked it there myself. I have an account there.",
"I'd have asked it there myself. I have an account there. But instead",
"it's been migrated to a quiet beta site where it will get dozens",
"have an account there. But instead of being here, where it will be",
"only gets migrated if it's not a good fit here. So why was",
"was migrated to Open Data. That's annoying. If I'd wanted it there, I'd",
"dozens of views, very few of which will be academics. Across the whole",
"have asked it there myself. I have an account there. But instead of",
"on DOIs for time series](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/40634/how-are-dois-managed-for-ongoing-time-series) was migrated to Open Data. That's annoying. If",
"[question on DOIs for time series](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/40634/how-are-dois-managed-for-ongoing-time-series) was migrated to Open Data. That's annoying.",
"That's annoying. If I'd wanted it there, I'd have asked it there myself.",
"for time series](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/40634/how-are-dois-managed-for-ongoing-time-series) was migrated to Open Data. That's annoying. If I'd wanted",
"by hundreds of academics, and get thousands of views, it's been migrated to",
"the whole Stack Exchange, a question doesn't get migrated just because it's a",
"because it's a good fit elsewhere. It only gets migrated if it's not",
"be seen by hundreds of academics, and get thousands of views, it's been",
"academics. Across the whole Stack Exchange, a question doesn't get migrated just because",
"just because it's a good fit elsewhere. It only gets migrated if it's",
"elsewhere. It only gets migrated if it's not a good fit here. So",
"to Open Data. That's annoying. If I'd wanted it there, I'd have asked",
"where it will get dozens of views, very few of which will be",
"time series](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/40634/how-are-dois-managed-for-ongoing-time-series) was migrated to Open Data. That's annoying. If I'd wanted it",
"of views, very few of which will be academics. Across the whole Stack",
"to a quiet beta site where it will get dozens of views, very",
"academics, and get thousands of views, it's been migrated to a quiet beta",
"series](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/40634/how-are-dois-managed-for-ongoing-time-series) was migrated to Open Data. That's annoying. If I'd wanted it there,",
"it there myself. I have an account there. But instead of being here,",
"fit here. So why was this question not considered a good fit here?",
"views, very few of which will be academics. Across the whole Stack Exchange,",
"I have an account there. But instead of being here, where it will",
"quiet beta site where it will get dozens of views, very few of",
"it will get dozens of views, very few of which will be academics.",
"of which will be academics. Across the whole Stack Exchange, a question doesn't",
"a quiet beta site where it will get dozens of views, very few",
"which will be academics. Across the whole Stack Exchange, a question doesn't get",
"and get thousands of views, it's been migrated to a quiet beta site",
"myself. I have an account there. But instead of being here, where it",
"good fit here. So why was this question not considered a good fit",
"it will be seen by hundreds of academics, and get thousands of views,",
"get thousands of views, it's been migrated to a quiet beta site where",
"If I'd wanted it there, I'd have asked it there myself. I have",
"Across the whole Stack Exchange, a question doesn't get migrated just because it's",
"not a good fit here. So why was this question not considered a",
"My [question on DOIs for time series](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/40634/how-are-dois-managed-for-ongoing-time-series) was migrated to Open Data. That's",
"of being here, where it will be seen by hundreds of academics, and",
"hundreds of academics, and get thousands of views, it's been migrated to a",
"it's a good fit elsewhere. It only gets migrated if it's not a",
"a question doesn't get migrated just because it's a good fit elsewhere. It",
"annoying. If I'd wanted it there, I'd have asked it there myself. I",
"thousands of views, it's been migrated to a quiet beta site where it",
"migrated to a quiet beta site where it will get dozens of views,",
"seen by hundreds of academics, and get thousands of views, it's been migrated",
"few of which will be academics. Across the whole Stack Exchange, a question",
"of views, it's been migrated to a quiet beta site where it will",
"where it will be seen by hundreds of academics, and get thousands of",
"being here, where it will be seen by hundreds of academics, and get",
"it's not a good fit here. So why was this question not considered",
"site where it will get dozens of views, very few of which will",
"get dozens of views, very few of which will be academics. Across the",
"question doesn't get migrated just because it's a good fit elsewhere. It only",
"good fit elsewhere. It only gets migrated if it's not a good fit",
"been migrated to a quiet beta site where it will get dozens of",
"It only gets migrated if it's not a good fit here. So why",
"migrated if it's not a good fit here. So why was this question",
"Open Data. That's annoying. If I'd wanted it there, I'd have asked it",
"fit elsewhere. It only gets migrated if it's not a good fit here.",
"migrated to Open Data. That's annoying. If I'd wanted it there, I'd have",
"Stack Exchange, a question doesn't get migrated just because it's a good fit",
"gets migrated if it's not a good fit here. So why was this",
"there myself. I have an account there. But instead of being here, where",
"account there. But instead of being here, where it will be seen by",
"Exchange, a question doesn't get migrated just because it's a good fit elsewhere.",
"be academics. Across the whole Stack Exchange, a question doesn't get migrated just",
"very few of which will be academics. Across the whole Stack Exchange, a",
"views, it's been migrated to a quiet beta site where it will get",
"here, where it will be seen by hundreds of academics, and get thousands",
"will be academics. Across the whole Stack Exchange, a question doesn't get migrated",
"a good fit here. So why was this question not considered a good",
"will get dozens of views, very few of which will be academics. Across",
"DOIs for time series](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/40634/how-are-dois-managed-for-ongoing-time-series) was migrated to Open Data. That's annoying. If I'd",
"Data. That's annoying. If I'd wanted it there, I'd have asked it there",
"will be seen by hundreds of academics, and get thousands of views, it's",
"there, I'd have asked it there myself. I have an account there. But",
"wanted it there, I'd have asked it there myself. I have an account",
"a good fit elsewhere. It only gets migrated if it's not a good",
"of academics, and get thousands of views, it's been migrated to a quiet",
"I'd wanted it there, I'd have asked it there myself. I have an",
"instead of being here, where it will be seen by hundreds of academics,",
"beta site where it will get dozens of views, very few of which",
"get migrated just because it's a good fit elsewhere. It only gets migrated",
"an account there. But instead of being here, where it will be seen",
"asked it there myself. I have an account there. But instead of being",
"if it's not a good fit here. So why was this question not",
"there. But instead of being here, where it will be seen by hundreds"
] |
[
"be asking about formating a particular number and not about statistics itself. As",
"question it seems similar in nature to this non exhaustive list: [APA style",
"I cite a screenshot in APA style for my student paper?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32797/how-should-i-cite-a-screenshot-in-apa-style-for-my-student-paper) [In text",
"style for my student paper?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32797/how-should-i-cite-a-screenshot-in-apa-style-for-my-student-paper) [In text listing style - how to use?",
"<https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> It seems to be asking about formating a particular number and not",
"this non exhaustive list: [APA style for program used in a study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study) [How",
"to be asking about formating a particular number and not about statistics itself.",
"in a study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study) [How should I cite a screenshot in APA style for",
"itself. As a formating question it seems similar in nature to this non",
"cite a screenshot in APA style for my student paper?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32797/how-should-i-cite-a-screenshot-in-apa-style-for-my-student-paper) [In text listing",
"number and not about statistics itself. As a formating question it seems similar",
"program used in a study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study) [How should I cite a screenshot in APA",
"statistics itself. As a formating question it seems similar in nature to this",
"and not about statistics itself. As a formating question it seems similar in",
"As a formating question it seems similar in nature to this non exhaustive",
"in nature to this non exhaustive list: [APA style for program used in",
"screenshot in APA style for my student paper?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32797/how-should-i-cite-a-screenshot-in-apa-style-for-my-student-paper) [In text listing style -",
"asking about formating a particular number and not about statistics itself. As a",
"about statistics itself. As a formating question it seems similar in nature to",
"to this non exhaustive list: [APA style for program used in a study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study)",
"it seems similar in nature to this non exhaustive list: [APA style for",
"surprised that we closed <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> It seems to be asking about formating a",
"style for program used in a study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study) [How should I cite a screenshot",
"a formating question it seems similar in nature to this non exhaustive list:",
"seems to be asking about formating a particular number and not about statistics",
"was surprised that we closed <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> It seems to be asking about formating",
"not about statistics itself. As a formating question it seems similar in nature",
"a screenshot in APA style for my student paper?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32797/how-should-i-cite-a-screenshot-in-apa-style-for-my-student-paper) [In text listing style",
"my student paper?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32797/how-should-i-cite-a-screenshot-in-apa-style-for-my-student-paper) [In text listing style - how to use? Any downsides?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/12814/in-text-listing-style-how-to-use-any-downsides)",
"in APA style for my student paper?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32797/how-should-i-cite-a-screenshot-in-apa-style-for-my-student-paper) [In text listing style - how",
"nature to this non exhaustive list: [APA style for program used in a",
"exhaustive list: [APA style for program used in a study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study) [How should I",
"formating a particular number and not about statistics itself. As a formating question",
"[APA style for program used in a study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study) [How should I cite a",
"used in a study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study) [How should I cite a screenshot in APA style",
"It seems to be asking about formating a particular number and not about",
"for program used in a study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study) [How should I cite a screenshot in",
"I was surprised that we closed <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> It seems to be asking about",
"list: [APA style for program used in a study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study) [How should I cite",
"[How should I cite a screenshot in APA style for my student paper?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32797/how-should-i-cite-a-screenshot-in-apa-style-for-my-student-paper)",
"about formating a particular number and not about statistics itself. As a formating",
"a particular number and not about statistics itself. As a formating question it",
"non exhaustive list: [APA style for program used in a study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study) [How should",
"APA style for my student paper?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32797/how-should-i-cite-a-screenshot-in-apa-style-for-my-student-paper) [In text listing style - how to",
"a study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study) [How should I cite a screenshot in APA style for my",
"formating question it seems similar in nature to this non exhaustive list: [APA",
"we closed <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> It seems to be asking about formating a particular number",
"particular number and not about statistics itself. As a formating question it seems",
"seems similar in nature to this non exhaustive list: [APA style for program",
"study](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8090/apa-style-for-program-used-in-a-study) [How should I cite a screenshot in APA style for my student",
"for my student paper?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32797/how-should-i-cite-a-screenshot-in-apa-style-for-my-student-paper) [In text listing style - how to use? Any",
"similar in nature to this non exhaustive list: [APA style for program used",
"closed <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> It seems to be asking about formating a particular number and",
"should I cite a screenshot in APA style for my student paper?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32797/how-should-i-cite-a-screenshot-in-apa-style-for-my-student-paper) [In",
"that we closed <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> It seems to be asking about formating a particular"
] |
[
"or it is good to have them in the body of the questions?",
"should they really be edited or it is good to have them in",
"I edit such sentences because I do not find them really helpful, relevant",
"But, should they really be edited or it is good to have them",
"write some greeting sentences like `thank you for your attention.` or `any advice",
"users write some greeting sentences like `thank you for your attention.` or `any",
"want to express that they are thankful to the people who read and",
"such sentences because I do not find them really helpful, relevant or on-topic",
"times, I edit such sentences because I do not find them really helpful,",
"questions. Most of the times, I edit such sentences because I do not",
"I do not find them really helpful, relevant or on-topic to the questions'",
"are posted to their questions. Most of the times, I edit such sentences",
"sentences like these by which the users want to express that they are",
"sentences like `thank you for your attention.` or `any advice is appreciated.` or",
"to express that they are thankful to the people who read and give",
"appreciated.` or other sentences like these by which the users want to express",
"users want to express that they are thankful to the people who read",
"or `any advice is appreciated.` or other sentences like these by which the",
"like `thank you for your attention.` or `any advice is appreciated.` or other",
"Most of the times, I edit such sentences because I do not find",
"or on-topic to the questions' text. But, should they really be edited or",
"like these by which the users want to express that they are thankful",
"answers which are posted to their questions. Most of the times, I edit",
"by which the users want to express that they are thankful to the",
"which the users want to express that they are thankful to the people",
"to the questions' text. But, should they really be edited or it is",
"`thank you for your attention.` or `any advice is appreciated.` or other sentences",
"helpful, relevant or on-topic to the questions' text. But, should they really be",
"to the people who read and give advices on their questions; or they",
"or they appreciate any comments or solutions and answers which are posted to",
"them really helpful, relevant or on-topic to the questions' text. But, should they",
"any comments or solutions and answers which are posted to their questions. Most",
"In some questions, users write some greeting sentences like `thank you for your",
"their questions. Most of the times, I edit such sentences because I do",
"read and give advices on their questions; or they appreciate any comments or",
"questions, users write some greeting sentences like `thank you for your attention.` or",
"find them really helpful, relevant or on-topic to the questions' text. But, should",
"text. But, should they really be edited or it is good to have",
"the people who read and give advices on their questions; or they appreciate",
"`any advice is appreciated.` or other sentences like these by which the users",
"or other sentences like these by which the users want to express that",
"really helpful, relevant or on-topic to the questions' text. But, should they really",
"that they are thankful to the people who read and give advices on",
"and answers which are posted to their questions. Most of the times, I",
"to their questions. Most of the times, I edit such sentences because I",
"relevant or on-topic to the questions' text. But, should they really be edited",
"do not find them really helpful, relevant or on-topic to the questions' text.",
"express that they are thankful to the people who read and give advices",
"appreciate any comments or solutions and answers which are posted to their questions.",
"they really be edited or it is good to have them in the",
"people who read and give advices on their questions; or they appreciate any",
"advices on their questions; or they appreciate any comments or solutions and answers",
"the users want to express that they are thankful to the people who",
"be edited or it is good to have them in the body of",
"or solutions and answers which are posted to their questions. Most of the",
"for your attention.` or `any advice is appreciated.` or other sentences like these",
"greeting sentences like `thank you for your attention.` or `any advice is appreciated.`",
"really be edited or it is good to have them in the body",
"are thankful to the people who read and give advices on their questions;",
"which are posted to their questions. Most of the times, I edit such",
"on their questions; or they appreciate any comments or solutions and answers which",
"posted to their questions. Most of the times, I edit such sentences because",
"their questions; or they appreciate any comments or solutions and answers which are",
"not find them really helpful, relevant or on-topic to the questions' text. But,",
"your attention.` or `any advice is appreciated.` or other sentences like these by",
"comments or solutions and answers which are posted to their questions. Most of",
"is appreciated.` or other sentences like these by which the users want to",
"give advices on their questions; or they appreciate any comments or solutions and",
"of the times, I edit such sentences because I do not find them",
"sentences because I do not find them really helpful, relevant or on-topic to",
"the times, I edit such sentences because I do not find them really",
"questions' text. But, should they really be edited or it is good to",
"because I do not find them really helpful, relevant or on-topic to the",
"questions; or they appreciate any comments or solutions and answers which are posted",
"other sentences like these by which the users want to express that they",
"they appreciate any comments or solutions and answers which are posted to their",
"attention.` or `any advice is appreciated.` or other sentences like these by which",
"solutions and answers which are posted to their questions. Most of the times,",
"they are thankful to the people who read and give advices on their",
"some questions, users write some greeting sentences like `thank you for your attention.`",
"you for your attention.` or `any advice is appreciated.` or other sentences like",
"edited or it is good to have them in the body of the",
"these by which the users want to express that they are thankful to",
"advice is appreciated.` or other sentences like these by which the users want",
"thankful to the people who read and give advices on their questions; or",
"the questions' text. But, should they really be edited or it is good",
"on-topic to the questions' text. But, should they really be edited or it",
"edit such sentences because I do not find them really helpful, relevant or",
"who read and give advices on their questions; or they appreciate any comments",
"and give advices on their questions; or they appreciate any comments or solutions",
"some greeting sentences like `thank you for your attention.` or `any advice is"
] |
[
"with a link in my User's Profile about me section. I have seen",
"really low user participation. I want to promote those websites by mentioning their",
"a duplicate: [Why no link in the header of the main site to",
"promote those websites by mentioning their names with a link in my User's",
"no link in the header of the main site to our 'About' page?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/350/why-no-link-in-the-header-of-the-main-site-to-our-about-page)",
"have seen some users doing this on our site on their profiles. Is",
"two other Stack Exchange websites but they have really low user participation. I",
"other Stack Exchange websites but they have really low user participation. I want",
"me section. I have seen some users doing this on our site on",
"about me section. I have seen some users doing this on our site",
"link in my User's Profile about me section. I have seen some users",
"site on their profiles. Is it ethical to do such thing? Doesn't it",
"profiles. Is it ethical to do such thing? Doesn't it conflict Academia's website",
"ethical to do such thing? Doesn't it conflict Academia's website policies? related question,",
"not a duplicate: [Why no link in the header of the main site",
"by mentioning their names with a link in my User's Profile about me",
"I like one or two other Stack Exchange websites but they have really",
"Exchange websites but they have really low user participation. I want to promote",
"this on our site on their profiles. Is it ethical to do such",
"it ethical to do such thing? Doesn't it conflict Academia's website policies? related",
"low user participation. I want to promote those websites by mentioning their names",
"but they have really low user participation. I want to promote those websites",
"Profile about me section. I have seen some users doing this on our",
"some users doing this on our site on their profiles. Is it ethical",
"seen some users doing this on our site on their profiles. Is it",
"on their profiles. Is it ethical to do such thing? Doesn't it conflict",
"their profiles. Is it ethical to do such thing? Doesn't it conflict Academia's",
"question, but not a duplicate: [Why no link in the header of the",
"websites by mentioning their names with a link in my User's Profile about",
"their names with a link in my User's Profile about me section. I",
"have really low user participation. I want to promote those websites by mentioning",
"on our site on their profiles. Is it ethical to do such thing?",
"section. I have seen some users doing this on our site on their",
"my User's Profile about me section. I have seen some users doing this",
"Is it ethical to do such thing? Doesn't it conflict Academia's website policies?",
"participation. I want to promote those websites by mentioning their names with a",
"Academia's website policies? related question, but not a duplicate: [Why no link in",
"mentioning their names with a link in my User's Profile about me section.",
"conflict Academia's website policies? related question, but not a duplicate: [Why no link",
"related question, but not a duplicate: [Why no link in the header of",
"to promote those websites by mentioning their names with a link in my",
"doing this on our site on their profiles. Is it ethical to do",
"a link in my User's Profile about me section. I have seen some",
"User's Profile about me section. I have seen some users doing this on",
"websites but they have really low user participation. I want to promote those",
"to do such thing? Doesn't it conflict Academia's website policies? related question, but",
"like one or two other Stack Exchange websites but they have really low",
"I want to promote those websites by mentioning their names with a link",
"such thing? Doesn't it conflict Academia's website policies? related question, but not a",
"but not a duplicate: [Why no link in the header of the main",
"duplicate: [Why no link in the header of the main site to our",
"names with a link in my User's Profile about me section. I have",
"thing? Doesn't it conflict Academia's website policies? related question, but not a duplicate:",
"website policies? related question, but not a duplicate: [Why no link in the",
"in my User's Profile about me section. I have seen some users doing",
"Doesn't it conflict Academia's website policies? related question, but not a duplicate: [Why",
"they have really low user participation. I want to promote those websites by",
"one or two other Stack Exchange websites but they have really low user",
"[Why no link in the header of the main site to our 'About'",
"want to promote those websites by mentioning their names with a link in",
"do such thing? Doesn't it conflict Academia's website policies? related question, but not",
"users doing this on our site on their profiles. Is it ethical to",
"or two other Stack Exchange websites but they have really low user participation.",
"it conflict Academia's website policies? related question, but not a duplicate: [Why no",
"user participation. I want to promote those websites by mentioning their names with",
"our site on their profiles. Is it ethical to do such thing? Doesn't",
"those websites by mentioning their names with a link in my User's Profile",
"Stack Exchange websites but they have really low user participation. I want to",
"I have seen some users doing this on our site on their profiles.",
"policies? related question, but not a duplicate: [Why no link in the header"
] |
[
"we do not have so rich wikis for the tags on our meta",
"[meta site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/) of [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/) on Stack Exchange and I compare them to other",
"have so rich wikis for the tags on our meta website. Should we",
"review the tags, their wikis, excerpts and descriptions on the meta site of",
"and I compare them to other meta websites at Stack Exchange such as",
"on [meta site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/) of [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/) on Stack Exchange and I compare them to",
"and excerpts on [meta site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/) of [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/) on Stack Exchange and I compare",
"other meta websites at Stack Exchange such as [meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags), [meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and etc., I",
"I compare them to other meta websites at Stack Exchange such as [meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags),",
"of [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/) on Stack Exchange and I compare them to other meta websites",
"their wikis, excerpts and descriptions on the meta site of Academia? If yes,",
"the tags, their wikis, excerpts and descriptions on the meta site of Academia?",
"compare them to other meta websites at Stack Exchange such as [meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags), [meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags)",
"at Stack Exchange such as [meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags), [meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and etc., I can easily understand",
"tags, their wikis, excerpts and descriptions on the meta site of Academia? If",
"websites at Stack Exchange such as [meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags), [meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and etc., I can easily",
"Stack Exchange and I compare them to other meta websites at Stack Exchange",
"and descriptions on the meta site of Academia? If yes, what policy should",
"as [meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags), [meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and etc., I can easily understand that we do not",
"wikis and excerpts on [meta site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/) of [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/) on Stack Exchange and I",
"that we do not have so rich wikis for the tags on our",
"meta websites at Stack Exchange such as [meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags), [meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and etc., I can",
"etc., I can easily understand that we do not have so rich wikis",
"on our meta website. Should we review the tags, their wikis, excerpts and",
"such as [meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags), [meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and etc., I can easily understand that we do",
"I can easily understand that we do not have so rich wikis for",
"and etc., I can easily understand that we do not have so rich",
"[Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/) on Stack Exchange and I compare them to other meta websites at",
"Should we review the tags, their wikis, excerpts and descriptions on the meta",
"them to other meta websites at Stack Exchange such as [meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags), [meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and",
"wikis for the tags on our meta website. Should we review the tags,",
"tags on our meta website. Should we review the tags, their wikis, excerpts",
"the tags on our meta website. Should we review the tags, their wikis,",
"our meta website. Should we review the tags, their wikis, excerpts and descriptions",
"website. Should we review the tags, their wikis, excerpts and descriptions on the",
"wikis, excerpts and descriptions on the meta site of Academia? If yes, what",
"the meta site of Academia? If yes, what policy should this review have?",
"the [tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and their wikis and excerpts on [meta site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/) of [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/) on",
"Exchange and I compare them to other meta websites at Stack Exchange such",
"[meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and etc., I can easily understand that we do not have so",
"for the tags on our meta website. Should we review the tags, their",
"do not have so rich wikis for the tags on our meta website.",
"descriptions on the meta site of Academia? If yes, what policy should this",
"[tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and their wikis and excerpts on [meta site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/) of [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/) on Stack",
"Exchange such as [meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags), [meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and etc., I can easily understand that we",
"so rich wikis for the tags on our meta website. Should we review",
"meta website. Should we review the tags, their wikis, excerpts and descriptions on",
"not have so rich wikis for the tags on our meta website. Should",
"site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/) of [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/) on Stack Exchange and I compare them to other meta",
"to other meta websites at Stack Exchange such as [meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags), [meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and etc.,",
"at the [tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and their wikis and excerpts on [meta site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/) of [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/)",
"can easily understand that we do not have so rich wikis for the",
"their wikis and excerpts on [meta site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/) of [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/) on Stack Exchange and",
"understand that we do not have so rich wikis for the tags on",
"Stack Exchange such as [meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags), [meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and etc., I can easily understand that",
"easily understand that we do not have so rich wikis for the tags",
"look at the [tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and their wikis and excerpts on [meta site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/) of",
"we review the tags, their wikis, excerpts and descriptions on the meta site",
"on Stack Exchange and I compare them to other meta websites at Stack",
"and their wikis and excerpts on [meta site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/) of [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/) on Stack Exchange",
"on the meta site of Academia? If yes, what policy should this review",
"[meta.mathematics](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/tags), [meta.tex](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and etc., I can easily understand that we do not have",
"rich wikis for the tags on our meta website. Should we review the",
"When I look at the [tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and their wikis and excerpts on [meta",
"excerpts and descriptions on the meta site of Academia? If yes, what policy",
"I look at the [tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/tags) and their wikis and excerpts on [meta site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/)",
"excerpts on [meta site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/) of [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/) on Stack Exchange and I compare them"
] |
[
"we leave them and do not delete those comments. This will help our",
"in the danger of being flagged and deleted as a *too chatty* comment.",
"rarely found on our website. They are only posted when we want to",
"we want to inform new users that they have to edit their questions",
"warms the new users' heart and helps them to feel safe to stay",
"are only posted when we want to inform new users that they have",
"answers. Simply welcome posted comments are also in the danger of being flagged",
"on our website. They are only posted when we want to inform new",
"flagged and deleted as a *too chatty* comment. By posting this question, I",
"our website. They are only posted when we want to inform new users",
"In other Stack Exchange sites (mostly on [TeX](https://tex.stackexchange.com/) website), I have seen that",
"website!** comment and we leave them and do not delete those comments. This",
"is a bad etiquette for Academia, or how we can build a more",
"leave them and do not delete those comments. This will help our community",
"help our community be more friendly and have nicer look. Please post your",
"safe to stay in a friendly environment website. However, I can see that",
"this warms the new users' heart and helps them to feel safe to",
"on [TeX](https://tex.stackexchange.com/) website), I have seen that the users with longer period of",
"users. I really like this action as this warms the new users' heart",
"to feel safe to stay in a friendly environment website. However, I can",
"new users by posting a simple **Welcome to Academia website!** comment and we",
"questions or improve their answers. Simply welcome posted comments are also in the",
"Academia website!** comment and we leave them and do not delete those comments.",
"that welcome comments are rarely found on our website. They are only posted",
"those comments. This will help our community be more friendly and have nicer",
"improve their answers. Simply welcome posted comments are also in the danger of",
"found on our website. They are only posted when we want to inform",
"inform new users that they have to edit their questions or improve their",
"bad etiquette for Academia, or how we can build a more friendly community.",
"when we want to inform new users that they have to edit their",
"comment and we leave them and do not delete those comments. This will",
"also in the danger of being flagged and deleted as a *too chatty*",
"users by posting a simple **Welcome to Academia website!** comment and we leave",
"comment. By posting this question, I want to ask users to welcome new",
"that they have to edit their questions or improve their answers. Simply welcome",
"question, I want to ask users to welcome new users by posting a",
"edit their questions or improve their answers. Simply welcome posted comments are also",
"simple **Welcome to Academia website!** comment and we leave them and do not",
"a bad etiquette for Academia, or how we can build a more friendly",
"Stack Exchange sites (mostly on [TeX](https://tex.stackexchange.com/) website), I have seen that the users",
"of membership welcome newer users. I really like this action as this warms",
"I can see that welcome comments are rarely found on our website. They",
"comments are also in the danger of being flagged and deleted as a",
"ask users to welcome new users by posting a simple **Welcome to Academia",
"feel safe to stay in a friendly environment website. However, I can see",
"to inform new users that they have to edit their questions or improve",
"them and do not delete those comments. This will help our community be",
"their questions or improve their answers. Simply welcome posted comments are also in",
"danger of being flagged and deleted as a *too chatty* comment. By posting",
"comments. This will help our community be more friendly and have nicer look.",
"being flagged and deleted as a *too chatty* comment. By posting this question,",
"community be more friendly and have nicer look. Please post your answers if",
"I have seen that the users with longer period of membership welcome newer",
"newer users. I really like this action as this warms the new users'",
"this action as this warms the new users' heart and helps them to",
"other Stack Exchange sites (mostly on [TeX](https://tex.stackexchange.com/) website), I have seen that the",
"I really like this action as this warms the new users' heart and",
"the danger of being flagged and deleted as a *too chatty* comment. By",
"welcome comments are rarely found on our website. They are only posted when",
"*too chatty* comment. By posting this question, I want to ask users to",
"as a *too chatty* comment. By posting this question, I want to ask",
"seen that the users with longer period of membership welcome newer users. I",
"website), I have seen that the users with longer period of membership welcome",
"to ask users to welcome new users by posting a simple **Welcome to",
"Please post your answers if you feel this suggestion is a bad etiquette",
"to Academia website!** comment and we leave them and do not delete those",
"posting a simple **Welcome to Academia website!** comment and we leave them and",
"by posting a simple **Welcome to Academia website!** comment and we leave them",
"they have to edit their questions or improve their answers. Simply welcome posted",
"in a friendly environment website. However, I can see that welcome comments are",
"[TeX](https://tex.stackexchange.com/) website), I have seen that the users with longer period of membership",
"to edit their questions or improve their answers. Simply welcome posted comments are",
"of being flagged and deleted as a *too chatty* comment. By posting this",
"helps them to feel safe to stay in a friendly environment website. However,",
"to stay in a friendly environment website. However, I can see that welcome",
"This will help our community be more friendly and have nicer look. Please",
"environment website. However, I can see that welcome comments are rarely found on",
"nicer look. Please post your answers if you feel this suggestion is a",
"period of membership welcome newer users. I really like this action as this",
"are also in the danger of being flagged and deleted as a *too",
"posted when we want to inform new users that they have to edit",
"users with longer period of membership welcome newer users. I really like this",
"welcome posted comments are also in the danger of being flagged and deleted",
"heart and helps them to feel safe to stay in a friendly environment",
"users to welcome new users by posting a simple **Welcome to Academia website!**",
"However, I can see that welcome comments are rarely found on our website.",
"welcome newer users. I really like this action as this warms the new",
"and have nicer look. Please post your answers if you feel this suggestion",
"will help our community be more friendly and have nicer look. Please post",
"new users' heart and helps them to feel safe to stay in a",
"the users with longer period of membership welcome newer users. I really like",
"like this action as this warms the new users' heart and helps them",
"see that welcome comments are rarely found on our website. They are only",
"the new users' heart and helps them to feel safe to stay in",
"be more friendly and have nicer look. Please post your answers if you",
"and deleted as a *too chatty* comment. By posting this question, I want",
"with longer period of membership welcome newer users. I really like this action",
"comments are rarely found on our website. They are only posted when we",
"membership welcome newer users. I really like this action as this warms the",
"have to edit their questions or improve their answers. Simply welcome posted comments",
"delete those comments. This will help our community be more friendly and have",
"a simple **Welcome to Academia website!** comment and we leave them and do",
"can see that welcome comments are rarely found on our website. They are",
"**Welcome to Academia website!** comment and we leave them and do not delete",
"only posted when we want to inform new users that they have to",
"suggestion is a bad etiquette for Academia, or how we can build a",
"or improve their answers. Simply welcome posted comments are also in the danger",
"sites (mostly on [TeX](https://tex.stackexchange.com/) website), I have seen that the users with longer",
"(mostly on [TeX](https://tex.stackexchange.com/) website), I have seen that the users with longer period",
"answers if you feel this suggestion is a bad etiquette for Academia, or",
"deleted as a *too chatty* comment. By posting this question, I want to",
"chatty* comment. By posting this question, I want to ask users to welcome",
"I want to ask users to welcome new users by posting a simple",
"you feel this suggestion is a bad etiquette for Academia, or how we",
"that the users with longer period of membership welcome newer users. I really",
"friendly environment website. However, I can see that welcome comments are rarely found",
"feel this suggestion is a bad etiquette for Academia, or how we can",
"our community be more friendly and have nicer look. Please post your answers",
"longer period of membership welcome newer users. I really like this action as",
"have nicer look. Please post your answers if you feel this suggestion is",
"as this warms the new users' heart and helps them to feel safe",
"and do not delete those comments. This will help our community be more",
"stay in a friendly environment website. However, I can see that welcome comments",
"a *too chatty* comment. By posting this question, I want to ask users",
"By posting this question, I want to ask users to welcome new users",
"really like this action as this warms the new users' heart and helps",
"Simply welcome posted comments are also in the danger of being flagged and",
"website. However, I can see that welcome comments are rarely found on our",
"to welcome new users by posting a simple **Welcome to Academia website!** comment",
"not delete those comments. This will help our community be more friendly and",
"want to ask users to welcome new users by posting a simple **Welcome",
"your answers if you feel this suggestion is a bad etiquette for Academia,",
"posting this question, I want to ask users to welcome new users by",
"more friendly and have nicer look. Please post your answers if you feel",
"users' heart and helps them to feel safe to stay in a friendly",
"this suggestion is a bad etiquette for Academia, or how we can build",
"a friendly environment website. However, I can see that welcome comments are rarely",
"their answers. Simply welcome posted comments are also in the danger of being",
"if you feel this suggestion is a bad etiquette for Academia, or how",
"have seen that the users with longer period of membership welcome newer users.",
"users that they have to edit their questions or improve their answers. Simply",
"want to inform new users that they have to edit their questions or",
"post your answers if you feel this suggestion is a bad etiquette for",
"look. Please post your answers if you feel this suggestion is a bad",
"do not delete those comments. This will help our community be more friendly",
"action as this warms the new users' heart and helps them to feel",
"and helps them to feel safe to stay in a friendly environment website.",
"friendly and have nicer look. Please post your answers if you feel this",
"and we leave them and do not delete those comments. This will help",
"new users that they have to edit their questions or improve their answers.",
"posted comments are also in the danger of being flagged and deleted as",
"Exchange sites (mostly on [TeX](https://tex.stackexchange.com/) website), I have seen that the users with",
"are rarely found on our website. They are only posted when we want",
"this question, I want to ask users to welcome new users by posting",
"website. They are only posted when we want to inform new users that",
"welcome new users by posting a simple **Welcome to Academia website!** comment and",
"them to feel safe to stay in a friendly environment website. However, I",
"They are only posted when we want to inform new users that they"
] |
[
"the only style used in psychology journals, but is also used in other",
"edition, documenting (among other things) the [APA Style](http://www.apastyle.org), a citation and referencing style.",
"publishes its *Publication Manual*, now in its sixth edition, documenting (among other things)",
"is also used in other fields. There are [BibTeX packages on CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201) to",
"There are [BibTeX packages on CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201) to implement it. We have quite a",
"used in other fields. There are [BibTeX packages on CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201) to implement it.",
"but is also used in other fields. There are [BibTeX packages on CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201)",
"questions tagged 'apa-style'\") and retagging these questions (except for [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24377/4140) and [this",
"a few [questions related to APA style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion). I propose creating a new tag",
"[apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style \"show questions tagged 'apa-style'\") and retagging these questions (except for [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24377/4140)",
"and referencing style. APA Style is pretty common. It is pretty much the",
"to implement it. We have quite a few [questions related to APA style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion).",
"CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201) to implement it. We have quite a few [questions related to APA",
"new tag [apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style \"show questions tagged 'apa-style'\") and retagging these questions (except for",
"*Publication Manual*, now in its sixth edition, documenting (among other things) the [APA",
"creating a new tag [apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style \"show questions tagged 'apa-style'\") and retagging these questions",
"documenting (among other things) the [APA Style](http://www.apastyle.org), a citation and referencing style. APA",
"pretty much the only style used in psychology journals, but is also used",
"its *Publication Manual*, now in its sixth edition, documenting (among other things) the",
"propose creating a new tag [apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style \"show questions tagged 'apa-style'\") and retagging these",
"related to APA style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion). I propose creating a new tag [apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style \"show questions",
"(among other things) the [APA Style](http://www.apastyle.org), a citation and referencing style. APA Style",
"APA Style is pretty common. It is pretty much the only style used",
"now in its sixth edition, documenting (among other things) the [APA Style](http://www.apastyle.org), a",
"have quite a few [questions related to APA style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion). I propose creating a",
"other fields. There are [BibTeX packages on CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201) to implement it. We have",
"few [questions related to APA style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion). I propose creating a new tag [apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style",
"and retagging these questions (except for [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24377/4140) and [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10963/4140)) unless there",
"its sixth edition, documenting (among other things) the [APA Style](http://www.apastyle.org), a citation and",
"Psychological Association (APA) publishes its *Publication Manual*, now in its sixth edition, documenting",
"quite a few [questions related to APA style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion). I propose creating a new",
"common. It is pretty much the only style used in psychology journals, but",
"\"show questions tagged 'apa-style'\") and retagging these questions (except for [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24377/4140) and",
"Style](http://www.apastyle.org), a citation and referencing style. APA Style is pretty common. It is",
"used in psychology journals, but is also used in other fields. There are",
"sixth edition, documenting (among other things) the [APA Style](http://www.apastyle.org), a citation and referencing",
"it. We have quite a few [questions related to APA style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion). I propose",
"tag [apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style \"show questions tagged 'apa-style'\") and retagging these questions (except for [this",
"[BibTeX packages on CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201) to implement it. We have quite a few [questions",
"things) the [APA Style](http://www.apastyle.org), a citation and referencing style. APA Style is pretty",
"retagging these questions (except for [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24377/4140) and [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10963/4140)) unless there are",
"is pretty much the only style used in psychology journals, but is also",
"a citation and referencing style. APA Style is pretty common. It is pretty",
"Style is pretty common. It is pretty much the only style used in",
"It is pretty much the only style used in psychology journals, but is",
"'apa-style'\") and retagging these questions (except for [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24377/4140) and [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10963/4140)) unless",
"questions (except for [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24377/4140) and [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10963/4140)) unless there are objections. Thoughts?",
"tagged 'apa-style'\") and retagging these questions (except for [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24377/4140) and [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10963/4140))",
"in other fields. There are [BibTeX packages on CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201) to implement it. We",
"to APA style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion). I propose creating a new tag [apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style \"show questions tagged",
"pretty common. It is pretty much the only style used in psychology journals,",
"on CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201) to implement it. We have quite a few [questions related to",
"We have quite a few [questions related to APA style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion). I propose creating",
"[APA Style](http://www.apastyle.org), a citation and referencing style. APA Style is pretty common. It",
"style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion). I propose creating a new tag [apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style \"show questions tagged 'apa-style'\") and",
"only style used in psychology journals, but is also used in other fields.",
"these questions (except for [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24377/4140) and [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10963/4140)) unless there are objections.",
"much the only style used in psychology journals, but is also used in",
"style used in psychology journals, but is also used in other fields. There",
"packages on CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201) to implement it. We have quite a few [questions related",
"a new tag [apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style \"show questions tagged 'apa-style'\") and retagging these questions (except",
"implement it. We have quite a few [questions related to APA style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion). I",
"APA style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion). I propose creating a new tag [apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style \"show questions tagged 'apa-style'\")",
"[questions related to APA style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=%22APA+Style%22+is%3Aquestion). I propose creating a new tag [apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style \"show",
"citation and referencing style. APA Style is pretty common. It is pretty much",
"Manual*, now in its sixth edition, documenting (among other things) the [APA Style](http://www.apastyle.org),",
"style. APA Style is pretty common. It is pretty much the only style",
"Association (APA) publishes its *Publication Manual*, now in its sixth edition, documenting (among",
"in psychology journals, but is also used in other fields. There are [BibTeX",
"American Psychological Association (APA) publishes its *Publication Manual*, now in its sixth edition,",
"fields. There are [BibTeX packages on CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201) to implement it. We have quite",
"The American Psychological Association (APA) publishes its *Publication Manual*, now in its sixth",
"are [BibTeX packages on CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201) to implement it. We have quite a few",
"I propose creating a new tag [apa-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/apa-style \"show questions tagged 'apa-style'\") and retagging",
"in its sixth edition, documenting (among other things) the [APA Style](http://www.apastyle.org), a citation",
"(APA) publishes its *Publication Manual*, now in its sixth edition, documenting (among other",
"journals, but is also used in other fields. There are [BibTeX packages on",
"also used in other fields. There are [BibTeX packages on CRAN](https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/2628/22201) to implement",
"other things) the [APA Style](http://www.apastyle.org), a citation and referencing style. APA Style is",
"psychology journals, but is also used in other fields. There are [BibTeX packages",
"the [APA Style](http://www.apastyle.org), a citation and referencing style. APA Style is pretty common.",
"referencing style. APA Style is pretty common. It is pretty much the only",
"is pretty common. It is pretty much the only style used in psychology"
] |
[
"for journal recommendations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47/19607). I was surprised about the large number of upvotes, considering",
"to come across [this question asking for journal recommendations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47/19607). I was surprised about",
"of upvotes, considering the specificity and [these instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > However, please do",
"> However, please do not ask questions about > > > * ...",
"> * Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research topic (a",
"However, the sole answer is not super-conclusive (conclusion: it's borderline) and the question",
"question was since deleted by the OP anyway, so I don't know that",
"come from supporting an open access sentiment, and/or maybe we have a lot",
"a university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\") > * ... >",
"a question being acceptable?) Note: there was a [similar meta question here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607) about",
"> Possibly a lot of the votes come from supporting an open access",
"recommendations for a university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\") > *",
"have a lot of people on this site in theoretical biology. Are questions",
"university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\") > * ... > >",
"journal recommendations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47/19607). I was surprised about the large number of upvotes, considering the",
"Are questions like this considered acceptable, whereas other \"shopping\" questions are not? If",
"super-conclusive (conclusion: it's borderline) and the question in question was since deleted by",
"> > Possibly a lot of the votes come from supporting an open",
"is? (Can having many upvotes be a reason for a question being acceptable?)",
"lot of people on this site in theoretical biology. Are questions like this",
"upvotes be a reason for a question being acceptable?) Note: there was a",
"about the large number of upvotes, considering the specificity and [these instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) >",
"borderline) and the question in question was since deleted by the OP anyway,",
"question was not closed. However, the sole answer is not super-conclusive (conclusion: it's",
"on this site in theoretical biology. Are questions like this considered acceptable, whereas",
"a [similar meta question here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607) about why a certain question was not closed.",
"happened to come across [this question asking for journal recommendations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47/19607). I was surprised",
"acceptable, whereas other \"shopping\" questions are not? If so, can someone explain what",
"what the difference is? (Can having many upvotes be a reason for a",
"* Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping",
"or research topic (a \"shopping question\") > * ... > > > Possibly",
"lot of the votes come from supporting an open access sentiment, and/or maybe",
"considered acceptable, whereas other \"shopping\" questions are not? If so, can someone explain",
"explain what the difference is? (Can having many upvotes be a reason for",
"not super-conclusive (conclusion: it's borderline) and the question in question was since deleted",
"so, can someone explain what the difference is? (Can having many upvotes be",
"the sole answer is not super-conclusive (conclusion: it's borderline) and the question in",
"maybe we have a lot of people on this site in theoretical biology.",
"questions like this considered acceptable, whereas other \"shopping\" questions are not? If so,",
"considering the specificity and [these instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > However, please do not ask",
"in theoretical biology. Are questions like this considered acceptable, whereas other \"shopping\" questions",
"like this considered acceptable, whereas other \"shopping\" questions are not? If so, can",
"topic (a \"shopping question\") > * ... > > > Possibly a lot",
"certain question was not closed. However, the sole answer is not super-conclusive (conclusion:",
"question asking for journal recommendations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47/19607). I was surprised about the large number of",
"recommendations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47/19607). I was surprised about the large number of upvotes, considering the specificity",
"large number of upvotes, considering the specificity and [these instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > However,",
"or recommendations for a university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\") >",
"I was surprised about the large number of upvotes, considering the specificity and",
"the difference is? (Can having many upvotes be a reason for a question",
"not? If so, can someone explain what the difference is? (Can having many",
"other \"shopping\" questions are not? If so, can someone explain what the difference",
"(a \"shopping question\") > * ... > > > Possibly a lot of",
"a lot of the votes come from supporting an open access sentiment, and/or",
"about > > > * ... > * Suggestions or recommendations for a",
"votes come from supporting an open access sentiment, and/or maybe we have a",
"here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607) about why a certain question was not closed. However, the sole answer",
"research topic (a \"shopping question\") > * ... > > > Possibly a",
"of the votes come from supporting an open access sentiment, and/or maybe we",
"specificity and [these instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > However, please do not ask questions about",
"be a reason for a question being acceptable?) Note: there was a [similar",
"closed. However, the sole answer is not super-conclusive (conclusion: it's borderline) and the",
"do not ask questions about > > > * ... > * Suggestions",
"> > * ... > * Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal,",
"since deleted by the OP anyway, so I don't know that a community",
"by the OP anyway, so I don't know that a community consensus was",
"sole answer is not super-conclusive (conclusion: it's borderline) and the question in question",
"question in question was since deleted by the OP anyway, so I don't",
"question\") > * ... > > > Possibly a lot of the votes",
"\"shopping\" questions are not? If so, can someone explain what the difference is?",
"> * ... > > > Possibly a lot of the votes come",
"just happened to come across [this question asking for journal recommendations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47/19607). I was",
"why a certain question was not closed. However, the sole answer is not",
"someone explain what the difference is? (Can having many upvotes be a reason",
"the OP anyway, so I don't know that a community consensus was reached.",
"and [these instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > However, please do not ask questions about >",
"> > > Possibly a lot of the votes come from supporting an",
"Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\")",
"> * ... > * Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or",
"answer is not super-conclusive (conclusion: it's borderline) and the question in question was",
"a certain question was not closed. However, the sole answer is not super-conclusive",
"is not super-conclusive (conclusion: it's borderline) and the question in question was since",
"the votes come from supporting an open access sentiment, and/or maybe we have",
"was not closed. However, the sole answer is not super-conclusive (conclusion: it's borderline)",
"biology. Are questions like this considered acceptable, whereas other \"shopping\" questions are not?",
"surprised about the large number of upvotes, considering the specificity and [these instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)",
"ask questions about > > > * ... > * Suggestions or recommendations",
"across [this question asking for journal recommendations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47/19607). I was surprised about the large",
"and the question in question was since deleted by the OP anyway, so",
"[these instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > However, please do not ask questions about > >",
"theoretical biology. Are questions like this considered acceptable, whereas other \"shopping\" questions are",
"please do not ask questions about > > > * ... > *",
"I just happened to come across [this question asking for journal recommendations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47/19607). I",
"upvotes, considering the specificity and [these instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > However, please do not",
"reason for a question being acceptable?) Note: there was a [similar meta question",
"there was a [similar meta question here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607) about why a certain question was",
"[similar meta question here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607) about why a certain question was not closed. However,",
"being acceptable?) Note: there was a [similar meta question here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607) about why a",
"having many upvotes be a reason for a question being acceptable?) Note: there",
"meta question here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607) about why a certain question was not closed. However, the",
"sentiment, and/or maybe we have a lot of people on this site in",
"of people on this site in theoretical biology. Are questions like this considered",
"can someone explain what the difference is? (Can having many upvotes be a",
"not ask questions about > > > * ... > * Suggestions or",
"this considered acceptable, whereas other \"shopping\" questions are not? If so, can someone",
"Note: there was a [similar meta question here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607) about why a certain question",
"[this question asking for journal recommendations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47/19607). I was surprised about the large number",
"was a [similar meta question here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607) about why a certain question was not",
"the question in question was since deleted by the OP anyway, so I",
"(Can having many upvotes be a reason for a question being acceptable?) Note:",
"in question was since deleted by the OP anyway, so I don't know",
"this site in theoretical biology. Are questions like this considered acceptable, whereas other",
"instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > However, please do not ask questions about > > >",
"questions are not? If so, can someone explain what the difference is? (Can",
"question here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607) about why a certain question was not closed. However, the sole",
"from supporting an open access sentiment, and/or maybe we have a lot of",
"people on this site in theoretical biology. Are questions like this considered acceptable,",
"for a question being acceptable?) Note: there was a [similar meta question here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607)",
"was since deleted by the OP anyway, so I don't know that a",
"However, please do not ask questions about > > > * ... >",
"many upvotes be a reason for a question being acceptable?) Note: there was",
"> > > * ... > * Suggestions or recommendations for a university,",
"site in theoretical biology. Are questions like this considered acceptable, whereas other \"shopping\"",
"* ... > > > Possibly a lot of the votes come from",
"Possibly a lot of the votes come from supporting an open access sentiment,",
"are not? If so, can someone explain what the difference is? (Can having",
"... > > > Possibly a lot of the votes come from supporting",
"> > However, please do not ask questions about > > > *",
"come across [this question asking for journal recommendations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47/19607). I was surprised about the",
"a reason for a question being acceptable?) Note: there was a [similar meta",
"deleted by the OP anyway, so I don't know that a community consensus",
"number of upvotes, considering the specificity and [these instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > However, please",
"journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\") > * ... > > >",
"asking for journal recommendations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47/19607). I was surprised about the large number of upvotes,",
"it's borderline) and the question in question was since deleted by the OP",
"the large number of upvotes, considering the specificity and [these instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > >",
"difference is? (Can having many upvotes be a reason for a question being",
"* ... > * Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research",
"was surprised about the large number of upvotes, considering the specificity and [these",
"we have a lot of people on this site in theoretical biology. Are",
"about why a certain question was not closed. However, the sole answer is",
"not closed. However, the sole answer is not super-conclusive (conclusion: it's borderline) and",
"acceptable?) Note: there was a [similar meta question here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607) about why a certain",
"questions about > > > * ... > * Suggestions or recommendations for",
"\"shopping question\") > * ... > > > Possibly a lot of the",
"for a university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\") > * ...",
"question being acceptable?) Note: there was a [similar meta question here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1566/19607) about why",
"... > * Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research topic",
"a lot of people on this site in theoretical biology. Are questions like",
"supporting an open access sentiment, and/or maybe we have a lot of people",
"an open access sentiment, and/or maybe we have a lot of people on",
"open access sentiment, and/or maybe we have a lot of people on this",
"whereas other \"shopping\" questions are not? If so, can someone explain what the",
"(conclusion: it's borderline) and the question in question was since deleted by the",
"and/or maybe we have a lot of people on this site in theoretical",
"access sentiment, and/or maybe we have a lot of people on this site",
"the specificity and [these instructions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > However, please do not ask questions",
"If so, can someone explain what the difference is? (Can having many upvotes"
] |
[
"how to verify whether someone went to the college/university that their resume says",
"to students and employers. I find this a morally distasteful business model and",
"of student degree verification services. I'm in a bit of a conflict because",
"to a third-party which then resells them to students and employers. I find",
"is a non-profit that handles most of these type of student degree verification",
"model and I don't want to reward NSC with a direct link to",
"essentially sold my data to a third-party which then resells them to students",
"and I don't want to reward NSC with a direct link to them.",
"part) is to refer the OP to \"National Student Clearinghouse\" which is a",
"direct link to them. But back in the Real World®, people do need",
"with a direct link to them. But back in the Real World®, people",
"wrote an answer to this question concerning how to verify whether someone went",
"very happy that even my own university and alma mater have essentially sold",
"a direct link to them. But back in the Real World®, people do",
"Clearinghouse\" which is a non-profit that handles most of these type of student",
"to reward NSC with a direct link to them. But back in the",
"to this question concerning how to verify whether someone went to the college/university",
"a non-profit that handles most of these type of student degree verification services.",
"resells them to students and employers. I find this a morally distasteful business",
"degree verification services. I'm in a bit of a conflict because I'm not",
"these type of student degree verification services. I'm in a bit of a",
"that handles most of these type of student degree verification services. I'm in",
"[Fraudulent credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836) The correct answer (in part) is to refer the OP to",
"refer the OP to \"National Student Clearinghouse\" which is a non-profit that handles",
"and employers. I find this a morally distasteful business model and I don't",
"own university and alma mater have essentially sold my data to a third-party",
"someone went to the college/university that their resume says they went to: [Fraudulent",
"most of these type of student degree verification services. I'm in a bit",
"the OP to \"National Student Clearinghouse\" which is a non-profit that handles most",
"concerning how to verify whether someone went to the college/university that their resume",
"is to refer the OP to \"National Student Clearinghouse\" which is a non-profit",
"alma mater have essentially sold my data to a third-party which then resells",
"to: [Fraudulent credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836) The correct answer (in part) is to refer the OP",
"want to reward NSC with a direct link to them. But back in",
"my data to a third-party which then resells them to students and employers.",
"resume says they went to: [Fraudulent credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836) The correct answer (in part) is",
"not very happy that even my own university and alma mater have essentially",
"back in the Real World®, people do need to know about their existence.",
"type of student degree verification services. I'm in a bit of a conflict",
"and alma mater have essentially sold my data to a third-party which then",
"to refer the OP to \"National Student Clearinghouse\" which is a non-profit that",
"a morally distasteful business model and I don't want to reward NSC with",
"data to a third-party which then resells them to students and employers. I",
"credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836) The correct answer (in part) is to refer the OP to \"National",
"happy that even my own university and alma mater have essentially sold my",
"this a morally distasteful business model and I don't want to reward NSC",
"\"National Student Clearinghouse\" which is a non-profit that handles most of these type",
"The correct answer (in part) is to refer the OP to \"National Student",
"they went to: [Fraudulent credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836) The correct answer (in part) is to refer",
"I'm not very happy that even my own university and alma mater have",
"answer to this question concerning how to verify whether someone went to the",
"NSC with a direct link to them. But back in the Real World®,",
"to verify whether someone went to the college/university that their resume says they",
"them to students and employers. I find this a morally distasteful business model",
"sold my data to a third-party which then resells them to students and",
"because I'm not very happy that even my own university and alma mater",
"them. But back in the Real World®, people do need to know about",
"of a conflict because I'm not very happy that even my own university",
"reward NSC with a direct link to them. But back in the Real",
"employers. I find this a morally distasteful business model and I don't want",
"handles most of these type of student degree verification services. I'm in a",
"an answer to this question concerning how to verify whether someone went to",
"which is a non-profit that handles most of these type of student degree",
"find this a morally distasteful business model and I don't want to reward",
"morally distasteful business model and I don't want to reward NSC with a",
"says they went to: [Fraudulent credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836) The correct answer (in part) is to",
"student degree verification services. I'm in a bit of a conflict because I'm",
"to them. But back in the Real World®, people do need to know",
"But back in the Real World®, people do need to know about their",
"even my own university and alma mater have essentially sold my data to",
"went to: [Fraudulent credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836) The correct answer (in part) is to refer the",
"don't want to reward NSC with a direct link to them. But back",
"to the college/university that their resume says they went to: [Fraudulent credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836) The",
"a bit of a conflict because I'm not very happy that even my",
"a third-party which then resells them to students and employers. I find this",
"bit of a conflict because I'm not very happy that even my own",
"in the Real World®, people do need to know about their existence. Suggestions?",
"Student Clearinghouse\" which is a non-profit that handles most of these type of",
"I'm in a bit of a conflict because I'm not very happy that",
"that even my own university and alma mater have essentially sold my data",
"answer (in part) is to refer the OP to \"National Student Clearinghouse\" which",
"my own university and alma mater have essentially sold my data to a",
"students and employers. I find this a morally distasteful business model and I",
"a conflict because I'm not very happy that even my own university and",
"to \"National Student Clearinghouse\" which is a non-profit that handles most of these",
"I don't want to reward NSC with a direct link to them. But",
"in a bit of a conflict because I'm not very happy that even",
"that their resume says they went to: [Fraudulent credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836) The correct answer (in",
"college/university that their resume says they went to: [Fraudulent credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836) The correct answer",
"the college/university that their resume says they went to: [Fraudulent credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836) The correct",
"their resume says they went to: [Fraudulent credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836) The correct answer (in part)",
"verify whether someone went to the college/university that their resume says they went",
"went to the college/university that their resume says they went to: [Fraudulent credentials](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42835/fraudulent-credentials/42836?noredirect=1#comment95307_42836)",
"whether someone went to the college/university that their resume says they went to:",
"have essentially sold my data to a third-party which then resells them to",
"(in part) is to refer the OP to \"National Student Clearinghouse\" which is",
"question concerning how to verify whether someone went to the college/university that their",
"non-profit that handles most of these type of student degree verification services. I'm",
"I wrote an answer to this question concerning how to verify whether someone",
"correct answer (in part) is to refer the OP to \"National Student Clearinghouse\"",
"which then resells them to students and employers. I find this a morally",
"distasteful business model and I don't want to reward NSC with a direct",
"OP to \"National Student Clearinghouse\" which is a non-profit that handles most of",
"this question concerning how to verify whether someone went to the college/university that",
"mater have essentially sold my data to a third-party which then resells them",
"I find this a morally distasteful business model and I don't want to",
"services. I'm in a bit of a conflict because I'm not very happy",
"link to them. But back in the Real World®, people do need to",
"conflict because I'm not very happy that even my own university and alma",
"third-party which then resells them to students and employers. I find this a",
"verification services. I'm in a bit of a conflict because I'm not very",
"business model and I don't want to reward NSC with a direct link",
"of these type of student degree verification services. I'm in a bit of",
"university and alma mater have essentially sold my data to a third-party which",
"then resells them to students and employers. I find this a morally distasteful"
] |
[
"tag's excerpt. (Based on the search results presented above, I think that the",
"in the process of their submission or withdrawing an academic position such as",
"for it which is now approved: > > Questions about withdrawal of books",
"withdraw ([56 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion)) and withdrawal ([16 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 17 questions",
"any edit to its excerpt and wiki. Although I am so sorry for",
"books, etc. during their review and publication process. 3. Delete the newly proposed",
"([15 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw)) and withdrawal ([2 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal)) in their title. 39 questions have retract",
"body and 7 questions have retract ([4 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract)) and retraction ([3 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction)) in",
"new [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with aim to be pinned to",
"which is now approved: > > Questions about withdrawal of books or papers",
"to be deleted. In my opinion, the first option discussed above is a",
"their body and title, the following results are accessible: 72 questions have withdraw",
"excerpt and wiki. Although I am so sorry for making a new tag",
"of the other and edit the main tag's excerpt. (Based on the search",
"tags with similar scopes and not just vote the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged",
"in their body and title, the following results are accessible: 72 questions have",
"to its excerpt and wiki. Although I am so sorry for making a",
"for questions which are about withdrawing academic positions such as a student withdrawing",
"searching the tags' list carefully; I think that it does worth that the",
"Ethics and logistics of withdrawing, refuting, or amending published > work. > >",
"'withdraw'\") tag to be deleted. In my opinion, the first option discussed above",
"questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag to be deleted. In my opinion, the first option",
"word. By searching the website for questions having these word in their body",
"questions about withdrawing papers in the process of their submission or withdrawing an",
"other and edit the main tag's excerpt. (Based on the search results presented",
"Although I am so sorry for making a new tag without searching the",
"books or papers from journals and > conferences or withdrawal during admissions process",
"results presented above, I think that the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag",
"some searches in the questions which include these word. By searching the website",
"questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag with similar scope. > > Ethics and logistics of",
"questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag can be a synonym of it. 2. Having both",
"to me, as it's scope may cover questions which are only about retraction",
"tagged 'retraction'\") tag seems a little vague to me, as it's scope may",
"tagged 'retraction'\") tag as it was before without any edit to its excerpt",
"\"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag to be deleted. In my opinion, the first",
"similar scopes and not just vote the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag",
"tags list, I found that we have a [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\")",
"'withdraw'\") tag with its current excerpt is more popular word and can be",
"[retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") for questions about withdrawing papers, books, etc. during",
"The [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag seems a little vague to me,",
"(Based on the search results presented above, I think that the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show",
"their body and 17 questions have withdraw ([15 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw)) and withdrawal ([2 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal))",
"which are only about retraction of published work, not withdrawing manuscripts which are",
"tags' list carefully; I think that it does worth that the community think",
"> work. > > > The [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag seems",
"([18 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion)) and retraction ([21 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 7 questions have",
"questions about withdrawing an academic position such as withdrawal during postgraduate admissions. I",
"sorry for making a new tag without searching the tags' list carefully; I",
"I think that the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with its current",
"their title. 39 questions have retract ([18 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion)) and retraction ([21 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion)) in",
"and not just vote the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag to be",
"body and title, the following results are accessible: 72 questions have withdraw ([56",
"is more popular word and can be the main tag and [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show",
"to have [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag for questions which are about",
"logistics of withdrawing, refuting, or amending published > work. > > > The",
"an academic position such as withdrawal during postgraduate admissions. I did some searches",
"these word. By searching the website for questions having these word in their",
"their excerpts to have [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag for questions which",
"work, not withdrawing manuscripts which are under review process or even questions about",
"newly proposed [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag and have previous [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show",
"'retraction'\") for questions about withdrawing papers, books, etc. during their review and publication",
"which are under review process or even questions about withdrawing an academic position",
"as withdrawal during postgraduate admissions. I did some searches in the questions which",
"two tags with similar scopes and not just vote the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions",
"'retraction'\") tag can be a synonym of it. 2. Having both tags on",
"when I was reading the tags list, I found that we have a",
"published > work. > > > The [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag",
"previous [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag as it was before without any",
"In my opinion, the first option discussed above is a better choice for",
"academic position such as admissions offers. I suggested an excerpt for it which",
"reading the tags list, I found that we have a [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions",
"> > > The [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag seems a little",
"'withdraw'\") tag for questions which are about withdrawing academic positions such as a",
"\"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag can be a synonym of it. 2. Having",
"Delete the newly proposed [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag and have previous",
"process, and to have [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") for questions about withdrawing",
"admissions process to academic > programmes. > > > However, after some hours,",
"questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw)) and withdrawal ([2 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal)) in their title. 39 questions have retract ([18",
"tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with its current excerpt is more popular word and can",
"about retraction of published work, not withdrawing manuscripts which are under review process",
"seems a little vague to me, as it's scope may cover questions which",
"a new tag without searching the tags' list carefully; I think that it",
"I suggested an excerpt for it which is now approved: > > Questions",
"72 questions have withdraw ([56 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion)) and withdrawal ([16 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body",
"and retraction ([21 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 7 questions have retract ([4",
"it. 2. Having both tags on the site, but we can edit their",
"> programmes. > > > However, after some hours, when I was reading",
"the tags' list carefully; I think that it does worth that the community",
"my opinion, the first option discussed above is a better choice for the",
"tags on the site, but we can edit their excerpts to have [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw",
"more popular word and can be the main tag and [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions",
"> conferences or withdrawal during admissions process to academic > programmes. > >",
"tagged 'withdraw'\") tag to be deleted. In my opinion, the first option discussed",
"questions have withdraw ([56 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion)) and withdrawal ([16 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and",
"[withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag to be deleted. In my opinion, the",
"which include these word. By searching the website for questions having these word",
"1. Making one of these tags synonym of the other and edit the",
"not just vote the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag to be deleted.",
"to be pinned to questions about withdrawing papers in the process of their",
"word in their body and title, the following results are accessible: 72 questions",
"some hours, when I was reading the tags list, I found that we",
"withdrawing, refuting, or amending published > work. > > > The [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show",
"\"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag for questions which are about withdrawing academic positions",
"with aim to be pinned to questions about withdrawing papers in the process",
"community think about these two tags with similar scopes and not just vote",
"only about retraction of published work, not withdrawing manuscripts which are under review",
"of published work, not withdrawing manuscripts which are under review process or even",
"have a [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag with similar scope. > >",
"questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag and have previous [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag",
"have withdraw ([15 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw)) and withdrawal ([2 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal)) in their title. 39 questions",
"or even questions about withdrawing an academic position such as withdrawal during postgraduate",
"the newly proposed [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag and have previous [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction",
"withdrawal of books or papers from journals and > conferences or withdrawal during",
"of withdrawing, refuting, or amending published > work. > > > The [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction",
"the site, but we can edit their excerpts to have [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions",
"process to academic > programmes. > > > However, after some hours, when",
"and logistics of withdrawing, refuting, or amending published > work. > > >",
"journals and > conferences or withdrawal during admissions process to academic > programmes.",
"withdrawal during postgraduate admissions. I did some searches in the questions which include",
"similar scope. > > Ethics and logistics of withdrawing, refuting, or amending published",
"new tag without searching the tags' list carefully; I think that it does",
"I was reading the tags list, I found that we have a [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction",
"> Ethics and logistics of withdrawing, refuting, or amending published > work. >",
"edit the main tag's excerpt. (Based on the search results presented above, I",
"such as a student withdrawing a PhD position during his admissions process, and",
"of it. 2. Having both tags on the site, but we can edit",
"as it was before without any edit to its excerpt and wiki. Although",
"Questions about withdrawal of books or papers from journals and > conferences or",
"withdrawal during admissions process to academic > programmes. > > > However, after",
"its current excerpt is more popular word and can be the main tag",
"'retraction'\") tag as it was before without any edit to its excerpt and",
"am so sorry for making a new tag without searching the tags' list",
"carefully; I think that it does worth that the community think about these",
"position during his admissions process, and to have [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\")",
"for questions about withdrawing papers, books, etc. during their review and publication process.",
"\"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag as it was before without any edit to",
"questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion)) and withdrawal ([16 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 17 questions have withdraw",
"a [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag with similar scope. > > Ethics",
"([21 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 7 questions have retract ([4 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract)) and",
"submission or withdrawing an academic position such as admissions offers. I suggested an",
"their submission or withdrawing an academic position such as admissions offers. I suggested",
"main tag's excerpt. (Based on the search results presented above, I think that",
"process. 3. Delete the newly proposed [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag and",
"the questions which include these word. By searching the website for questions having",
"questions tagged 'retraction'\") for questions about withdrawing papers, books, etc. during their review",
"tag seems a little vague to me, as it's scope may cover questions",
"was reading the tags list, I found that we have a [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show",
"questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 7 questions have retract ([4 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract)) and retraction",
"main tag and [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag can be a synonym",
"tag for questions which are about withdrawing academic positions such as a student",
"word and can be the main tag and [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\")",
"Today, I made a new [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with aim",
"it which is now approved: > > Questions about withdrawal of books or",
"withdrawing papers, books, etc. during their review and publication process. 3. Delete the",
"for questions having these word in their body and title, the following results",
"the tags list, I found that we have a [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged",
"about withdrawing papers in the process of their submission or withdrawing an academic",
"and to have [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") for questions about withdrawing papers,",
"body and 17 questions have withdraw ([15 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw)) and withdrawal ([2 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal)) in",
"making a new tag without searching the tags' list carefully; I think that",
"both tags on the site, but we can edit their excerpts to have",
"questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 17 questions have withdraw ([15 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw)) and withdrawal",
"to have [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") for questions about withdrawing papers, books,",
"have [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") for questions about withdrawing papers, books, etc.",
"admissions. I did some searches in the questions which include these word. By",
"to questions about withdrawing papers in the process of their submission or withdrawing",
"or withdrawal during admissions process to academic > programmes. > > > However,",
"are only about retraction of published work, not withdrawing manuscripts which are under",
"it's scope may cover questions which are only about retraction of published work,",
"excerpts to have [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag for questions which are",
"of books or papers from journals and > conferences or withdrawal during admissions",
"such as withdrawal during postgraduate admissions. I did some searches in the questions",
"have previous [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag as it was before without",
"does worth that the community think about these two tags with similar scopes",
"papers, books, etc. during their review and publication process. 3. Delete the newly",
"can be the main tag and [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag can",
"the search results presented above, I think that the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged",
"in their body and 17 questions have withdraw ([15 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw)) and withdrawal ([2",
"now approved: > > Questions about withdrawal of books or papers from journals",
"> > Ethics and logistics of withdrawing, refuting, or amending published > work.",
"we can edit their excerpts to have [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag",
"questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract)) and retraction ([3 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction)) in their title. 1. Making one of these",
"as a student withdrawing a PhD position during his admissions process, and to",
"retract ([18 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion)) and retraction ([21 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 7 questions",
"tag with aim to be pinned to questions about withdrawing papers in the",
"are about withdrawing academic positions such as a student withdrawing a PhD position",
"\"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag seems a little vague to me, as it's",
"after some hours, when I was reading the tags list, I found that",
"and 7 questions have retract ([4 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract)) and retraction ([3 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction)) in their",
"excerpt is more popular word and can be the main tag and [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction",
"withdrawing papers in the process of their submission or withdrawing an academic position",
"I am so sorry for making a new tag without searching the tags'",
"think that the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with its current excerpt",
"having these word in their body and title, the following results are accessible:",
"withdrawing academic positions such as a student withdrawing a PhD position during his",
"manuscripts which are under review process or even questions about withdrawing an academic",
"me, as it's scope may cover questions which are only about retraction of",
"position such as withdrawal during postgraduate admissions. I did some searches in the",
"presented above, I think that the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with",
"in their body and 7 questions have retract ([4 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract)) and retraction ([3",
"opinion, the first option discussed above is a better choice for the site.",
"title, the following results are accessible: 72 questions have withdraw ([56 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion)) and",
"[withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag and have previous [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged",
"about withdrawal of books or papers from journals and > conferences or withdrawal",
"be a synonym of it. 2. Having both tags on the site, but",
"in the questions which include these word. By searching the website for questions",
"searching the website for questions having these word in their body and title,",
"wiki. Although I am so sorry for making a new tag without searching",
"etc. during their review and publication process. 3. Delete the newly proposed [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw",
"and withdrawal ([2 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal)) in their title. 39 questions have retract ([18 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion))",
"have retract ([18 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion)) and retraction ([21 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 7",
"in their title. 1. Making one of these tags synonym of the other",
"title. 1. Making one of these tags synonym of the other and edit",
"questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction)) in their title. 1. Making one of these tags synonym of the",
"include these word. By searching the website for questions having these word in",
"questions have retract ([18 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion)) and retraction ([21 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and",
"retraction ([3 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction)) in their title. 1. Making one of these tags synonym",
"([3 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction)) in their title. 1. Making one of these tags synonym of",
"not withdrawing manuscripts which are under review process or even questions about withdrawing",
"review process or even questions about withdrawing an academic position such as withdrawal",
"> > However, after some hours, when I was reading the tags list,",
"made a new [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with aim to be",
"questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with aim to be pinned to questions about withdrawing",
"website for questions having these word in their body and title, the following",
"are under review process or even questions about withdrawing an academic position such",
"the other and edit the main tag's excerpt. (Based on the search results",
"and publication process. 3. Delete the newly proposed [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\")",
"to academic > programmes. > > > However, after some hours, when I",
"student withdrawing a PhD position during his admissions process, and to have [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction",
"papers in the process of their submission or withdrawing an academic position such",
"its excerpt and wiki. Although I am so sorry for making a new",
"be the main tag and [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag can be",
"a student withdrawing a PhD position during his admissions process, and to have",
"deleted. In my opinion, the first option discussed above is a better choice",
"with similar scope. > > Ethics and logistics of withdrawing, refuting, or amending",
"about withdrawing papers, books, etc. during their review and publication process. 3. Delete",
"on the site, but we can edit their excerpts to have [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show",
"suggested an excerpt for it which is now approved: > > Questions about",
"think that it does worth that the community think about these two tags",
"worth that the community think about these two tags with similar scopes and",
"retract ([4 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract)) and retraction ([3 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction)) in their title. 1. Making one",
"popular word and can be the main tag and [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged",
"excerpt for it which is now approved: > > Questions about withdrawal of",
"searches in the questions which include these word. By searching the website for",
"of these tags synonym of the other and edit the main tag's excerpt.",
"about withdrawing an academic position such as withdrawal during postgraduate admissions. I did",
"academic positions such as a student withdrawing a PhD position during his admissions",
"withdrawing a PhD position during his admissions process, and to have [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show",
"'withdraw'\") tag and have previous [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag as it",
"tag and have previous [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag as it was",
"scope. > > Ethics and logistics of withdrawing, refuting, or amending published >",
"even questions about withdrawing an academic position such as withdrawal during postgraduate admissions.",
"publication process. 3. Delete the newly proposed [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag",
"and [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag can be a synonym of it.",
"are accessible: 72 questions have withdraw ([56 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion)) and withdrawal ([16 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion)) in",
"tagged 'retraction'\") for questions about withdrawing papers, books, etc. during their review and",
"questions have retract ([4 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract)) and retraction ([3 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction)) in their title. 1.",
"and wiki. Although I am so sorry for making a new tag without",
"but we can edit their excerpts to have [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\")",
"withdraw ([15 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw)) and withdrawal ([2 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal)) in their title. 39 questions have",
"the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag to be deleted. In my opinion,",
"edit to its excerpt and wiki. Although I am so sorry for making",
"withdrawing manuscripts which are under review process or even questions about withdrawing an",
"Making one of these tags synonym of the other and edit the main",
"vote the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag to be deleted. In my",
"and retraction ([3 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction)) in their title. 1. Making one of these tags",
"and 17 questions have withdraw ([15 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw)) and withdrawal ([2 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal)) in their",
"withdrawing an academic position such as admissions offers. I suggested an excerpt for",
"tag to be deleted. In my opinion, the first option discussed above is",
"questions which are only about retraction of published work, not withdrawing manuscripts which",
"withdrawal ([2 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal)) in their title. 39 questions have retract ([18 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion)) and",
"with its current excerpt is more popular word and can be the main",
"current excerpt is more popular word and can be the main tag and",
"that the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with its current excerpt is",
"and withdrawal ([16 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 17 questions have withdraw ([15",
"site, but we can edit their excerpts to have [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged",
"about withdrawing academic positions such as a student withdrawing a PhD position during",
"I found that we have a [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag with",
"little vague to me, as it's scope may cover questions which are only",
"and can be the main tag and [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag",
"tag without searching the tags' list carefully; I think that it does worth",
"> Questions about withdrawal of books or papers from journals and > conferences",
"3. Delete the newly proposed [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag and have",
"above, I think that the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with its",
"is now approved: > > Questions about withdrawal of books or papers from",
"postgraduate admissions. I did some searches in the questions which include these word.",
"can be a synonym of it. 2. Having both tags on the site,",
"accessible: 72 questions have withdraw ([56 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion)) and withdrawal ([16 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion)) in their",
"tag and [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag can be a synonym of",
"the main tag's excerpt. (Based on the search results presented above, I think",
"[retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag seems a little vague to me, as",
"during admissions process to academic > programmes. > > > However, after some",
"can edit their excerpts to have [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag for",
"during their review and publication process. 3. Delete the newly proposed [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show",
"and title, the following results are accessible: 72 questions have withdraw ([56 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion))",
"hours, when I was reading the tags list, I found that we have",
"academic position such as withdrawal during postgraduate admissions. I did some searches in",
"questions having these word in their body and title, the following results are",
"amending published > work. > > > The [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\")",
"just vote the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag to be deleted. In",
"have withdraw ([56 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion)) and withdrawal ([16 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 17",
"may cover questions which are only about retraction of published work, not withdrawing",
"one of these tags synonym of the other and edit the main tag's",
"vague to me, as it's scope may cover questions which are only about",
"questions which include these word. By searching the website for questions having these",
"that we have a [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag with similar scope.",
"a little vague to me, as it's scope may cover questions which are",
"tag as it was before without any edit to its excerpt and wiki.",
"\"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag with similar scope. > > Ethics and logistics",
"positions such as a student withdrawing a PhD position during his admissions process,",
"questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag as it was before without any edit to its",
"withdrawing an academic position such as withdrawal during postgraduate admissions. I did some",
"I did some searches in the questions which include these word. By searching",
"published work, not withdrawing manuscripts which are under review process or even questions",
"I made a new [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with aim to",
"excerpt. (Based on the search results presented above, I think that the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw",
"for making a new tag without searching the tags' list carefully; I think",
"without searching the tags' list carefully; I think that it does worth that",
"be deleted. In my opinion, the first option discussed above is a better",
"39 questions have retract ([18 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion)) and retraction ([21 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body",
"Having both tags on the site, but we can edit their excerpts to",
"that it does worth that the community think about these two tags with",
"I think that it does worth that the community think about these two",
"questions have withdraw ([15 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw)) and withdrawal ([2 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal)) in their title. 39",
"on the search results presented above, I think that the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions",
"[withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag for questions which are about withdrawing academic",
"list, I found that we have a [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag",
"tag with its current excerpt is more popular word and can be the",
"of their submission or withdrawing an academic position such as admissions offers. I",
"synonym of the other and edit the main tag's excerpt. (Based on the",
"the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with its current excerpt is more",
"their review and publication process. 3. Delete the newly proposed [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions",
"or papers from journals and > conferences or withdrawal during admissions process to",
"scope may cover questions which are only about retraction of published work, not",
"as admissions offers. I suggested an excerpt for it which is now approved:",
"7 questions have retract ([4 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract)) and retraction ([3 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction)) in their title.",
"tag with similar scope. > > Ethics and logistics of withdrawing, refuting, or",
"[retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag as it was before without any edit",
"> > Questions about withdrawal of books or papers from journals and >",
"retraction ([21 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 7 questions have retract ([4 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract))",
"these word in their body and title, the following results are accessible: 72",
"which are about withdrawing academic positions such as a student withdrawing a PhD",
"programmes. > > > However, after some hours, when I was reading the",
"questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag seems a little vague to me, as it's scope",
"\"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") for questions about withdrawing papers, books, etc. during their",
"it was before without any edit to its excerpt and wiki. Although I",
"17 questions have withdraw ([15 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw)) and withdrawal ([2 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal)) in their title.",
"such as admissions offers. I suggested an excerpt for it which is now",
"> > The [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag seems a little vague",
"offers. I suggested an excerpt for it which is now approved: > >",
"the following results are accessible: 72 questions have withdraw ([56 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion)) and withdrawal",
"a new [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with aim to be pinned",
"tagged 'retraction'\") tag can be a synonym of it. 2. Having both tags",
"the website for questions having these word in their body and title, the",
"the main tag and [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag can be a",
"papers from journals and > conferences or withdrawal during admissions process to academic",
"tagged 'retraction'\") tag with similar scope. > > Ethics and logistics of withdrawing,",
"work. > > > The [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag seems a",
"admissions offers. I suggested an excerpt for it which is now approved: >",
"'retraction'\") tag seems a little vague to me, as it's scope may cover",
"before without any edit to its excerpt and wiki. Although I am so",
"synonym of it. 2. Having both tags on the site, but we can",
"[withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with aim to be pinned to questions",
"questions about withdrawing papers, books, etc. during their review and publication process. 3.",
"aim to be pinned to questions about withdrawing papers in the process of",
"2. Having both tags on the site, but we can edit their excerpts",
"\"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with its current excerpt is more popular word",
"scopes and not just vote the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag to",
"By searching the website for questions having these word in their body and",
"tags synonym of the other and edit the main tag's excerpt. (Based on",
"following results are accessible: 72 questions have withdraw ([56 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion)) and withdrawal ([16",
"these two tags with similar scopes and not just vote the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show",
"results are accessible: 72 questions have withdraw ([56 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion)) and withdrawal ([16 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion))",
"proposed [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag and have previous [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions",
"> > > However, after some hours, when I was reading the tags",
"admissions process, and to have [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") for questions about",
"or amending published > work. > > > The [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged",
"process or even questions about withdrawing an academic position such as withdrawal during",
"and edit the main tag's excerpt. (Based on the search results presented above,",
"that the community think about these two tags with similar scopes and not",
"However, after some hours, when I was reading the tags list, I found",
"academic > programmes. > > > However, after some hours, when I was",
"questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal)) in their title. 39 questions have retract ([18 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion)) and retraction ([21",
"review and publication process. 3. Delete the newly proposed [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged",
"in their title. 39 questions have retract ([18 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion)) and retraction ([21 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion))",
"during his admissions process, and to have [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") for",
"conferences or withdrawal during admissions process to academic > programmes. > > >",
"during postgraduate admissions. I did some searches in the questions which include these",
"an excerpt for it which is now approved: > > Questions about withdrawal",
"their title. 1. Making one of these tags synonym of the other and",
"> The [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag seems a little vague to",
"([16 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 17 questions have withdraw ([15 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw)) and",
"have retract ([4 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract)) and retraction ([3 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction)) in their title. 1. Making",
"([2 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdrawal)) in their title. 39 questions have retract ([18 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion)) and retraction",
"about these two tags with similar scopes and not just vote the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw",
"\"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with aim to be pinned to questions about",
"the community think about these two tags with similar scopes and not just",
"the process of their submission or withdrawing an academic position such as admissions",
"questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion)) and retraction ([21 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 7 questions have retract",
"cover questions which are only about retraction of published work, not withdrawing manuscripts",
"a synonym of it. 2. Having both tags on the site, but we",
"'withdraw'\") tag with aim to be pinned to questions about withdrawing papers in",
"his admissions process, and to have [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") for questions",
"> However, after some hours, when I was reading the tags list, I",
"tag can be a synonym of it. 2. Having both tags on the",
"with similar scopes and not just vote the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\")",
"their body and 7 questions have retract ([4 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract)) and retraction ([3 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction))",
"questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with its current excerpt is more popular word and",
"be pinned to questions about withdrawing papers in the process of their submission",
"from journals and > conferences or withdrawal during admissions process to academic >",
"approved: > > Questions about withdrawal of books or papers from journals and",
"[retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag with similar scope. > > Ethics and",
"and > conferences or withdrawal during admissions process to academic > programmes. >",
"found that we have a [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag with similar",
"[retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag can be a synonym of it. 2.",
"list carefully; I think that it does worth that the community think about",
"we have a [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag with similar scope. >",
"pinned to questions about withdrawing papers in the process of their submission or",
"refuting, or amending published > work. > > > The [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions",
"withdrawal ([16 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 17 questions have withdraw ([15 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Awithdraw))",
"process of their submission or withdrawing an academic position such as admissions offers.",
"'retraction'\") tag with similar scope. > > Ethics and logistics of withdrawing, refuting,",
"without any edit to its excerpt and wiki. Although I am so sorry",
"under review process or even questions about withdrawing an academic position such as",
"search results presented above, I think that the [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\")",
"or withdrawing an academic position such as admissions offers. I suggested an excerpt",
"title. 39 questions have retract ([18 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retract%20is%3Aquestion)) and retraction ([21 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=retraction%20is%3Aquestion)) in their",
"retraction of published work, not withdrawing manuscripts which are under review process or",
"\"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag and have previous [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\")",
"as it's scope may cover questions which are only about retraction of published",
"tagged 'withdraw'\") tag and have previous [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag as",
"so sorry for making a new tag without searching the tags' list carefully;",
"an academic position such as admissions offers. I suggested an excerpt for it",
"questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag for questions which are about withdrawing academic positions such",
"a PhD position during his admissions process, and to have [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions",
"have [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag for questions which are about withdrawing",
"position such as admissions offers. I suggested an excerpt for it which is",
"did some searches in the questions which include these word. By searching the",
"PhD position during his admissions process, and to have [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged",
"tagged 'withdraw'\") tag for questions which are about withdrawing academic positions such as",
"it does worth that the community think about these two tags with similar",
"questions which are about withdrawing academic positions such as a student withdrawing a",
"edit their excerpts to have [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag for questions",
"think about these two tags with similar scopes and not just vote the",
"these tags synonym of the other and edit the main tag's excerpt. (Based",
"([56 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdraw%20is%3Aquestion)) and withdrawal ([16 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=withdrawal%20is%3Aquestion)) in their body and 17 questions have",
"was before without any edit to its excerpt and wiki. Although I am",
"tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with aim to be pinned to questions about withdrawing papers",
"and have previous [retraction](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/retraction \"show questions tagged 'retraction'\") tag as it was before",
"[withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") tag with its current excerpt is more popular",
"([4 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretract)) and retraction ([3 questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=title%3Aretraction)) in their title. 1. Making one of"
] |
[
"be used for questions that are off topic here. In other words, if",
"it seems that a number of questions are being flagged for migration because",
"on topic here, it should stay even if it might be a better",
"I see there... * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43331/link-to-article-using-a-download-or-view-online-symbol> Although maybe better fits someplace else,",
"should only be used for questions that are off topic here. In other",
"are being flagged for migration because they are a better fit someplace else.",
"they are a better fit someplace else. My personal view on migration is",
"I am not sure what is up with the [migrated search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1), but of",
"a number of questions are being flagged for migration because they are a",
"it might be a better fit someplace else. What do people think about",
"stay even if it might be a better fit someplace else. What do",
"is it should only be used for questions that are off topic here.",
"* <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43331/link-to-article-using-a-download-or-view-online-symbol> Although maybe better fits someplace else, seem on topic",
"being flagged for migration because they are a better fit someplace else. My",
"are a better fit someplace else. My personal view on migration is it",
"but of the 10 questions I see there... * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43331/link-to-article-using-a-download-or-view-online-symbol> Although",
"search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1), but of the 10 questions I see there... * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43331/link-to-article-using-a-download-or-view-online-symbol>",
"10 questions I see there... * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43331/link-to-article-using-a-download-or-view-online-symbol> Although maybe better fits",
"because they are a better fit someplace else. My personal view on migration",
"for questions that are off topic here. In other words, if a question",
"a better fit someplace else. What do people think about migration? I am",
"that a number of questions are being flagged for migration because they are",
"someplace else. What do people think about migration? I am not sure what",
"for migration because they are a better fit someplace else. My personal view",
"fit someplace else. What do people think about migration? I am not sure",
"of the 10 questions I see there... * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43331/link-to-article-using-a-download-or-view-online-symbol> Although maybe",
"there... * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43331/link-to-article-using-a-download-or-view-online-symbol> Although maybe better fits someplace else, seem on",
"of questions are being flagged for migration because they are a better fit",
"only be used for questions that are off topic here. In other words,",
"about migration? I am not sure what is up with the [migrated search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1),",
"In other words, if a question is on topic here, it should stay",
"seems that a number of questions are being flagged for migration because they",
"better fit someplace else. My personal view on migration is it should only",
"be a better fit someplace else. What do people think about migration? I",
"number of questions are being flagged for migration because they are a better",
"not sure what is up with the [migrated search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1), but of the 10",
"better fit someplace else. What do people think about migration? I am not",
"used for questions that are off topic here. In other words, if a",
"a better fit someplace else. My personal view on migration is it should",
"that are off topic here. In other words, if a question is on",
"topic here, it should stay even if it might be a better fit",
"question is on topic here, it should stay even if it might be",
"fit someplace else. My personal view on migration is it should only be",
"migration because they are a better fit someplace else. My personal view on",
"migration? I am not sure what is up with the [migrated search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1), but",
"here. In other words, if a question is on topic here, it should",
"is on topic here, it should stay even if it might be a",
"someplace else. My personal view on migration is it should only be used",
"flagged for migration because they are a better fit someplace else. My personal",
"people think about migration? I am not sure what is up with the",
"personal view on migration is it should only be used for questions that",
"is up with the [migrated search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1), but of the 10 questions I see",
"<https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43331/link-to-article-using-a-download-or-view-online-symbol> Although maybe better fits someplace else, seem on topic here.",
"view on migration is it should only be used for questions that are",
"am not sure what is up with the [migrated search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1), but of the",
"migration is it should only be used for questions that are off topic",
"questions I see there... * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43331/link-to-article-using-a-download-or-view-online-symbol> Although maybe better fits someplace",
"else. What do people think about migration? I am not sure what is",
"what is up with the [migrated search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1), but of the 10 questions I",
"a question is on topic here, it should stay even if it might",
"questions are being flagged for migration because they are a better fit someplace",
"Recently, it seems that a number of questions are being flagged for migration",
"it should stay even if it might be a better fit someplace else.",
"on migration is it should only be used for questions that are off",
"do people think about migration? I am not sure what is up with",
"the [migrated search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1), but of the 10 questions I see there... * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication>",
"words, if a question is on topic here, it should stay even if",
"if a question is on topic here, it should stay even if it",
"topic here. In other words, if a question is on topic here, it",
"see there... * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43331/link-to-article-using-a-download-or-view-online-symbol> Although maybe better fits someplace else, seem",
"sure what is up with the [migrated search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1), but of the 10 questions",
"even if it might be a better fit someplace else. What do people",
"here, it should stay even if it might be a better fit someplace",
"might be a better fit someplace else. What do people think about migration?",
"with the [migrated search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1), but of the 10 questions I see there... *",
"it should only be used for questions that are off topic here. In",
"off topic here. In other words, if a question is on topic here,",
"What do people think about migration? I am not sure what is up",
"else. My personal view on migration is it should only be used for",
"the 10 questions I see there... * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43331/link-to-article-using-a-download-or-view-online-symbol> Although maybe better",
"My personal view on migration is it should only be used for questions",
"up with the [migrated search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1), but of the 10 questions I see there...",
"are off topic here. In other words, if a question is on topic",
"if it might be a better fit someplace else. What do people think",
"think about migration? I am not sure what is up with the [migrated",
"questions that are off topic here. In other words, if a question is",
"should stay even if it might be a better fit someplace else. What",
"other words, if a question is on topic here, it should stay even",
"[migrated search](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?tab=newest&q=Migrated%3a1), but of the 10 questions I see there... * <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41557/how-much-of-your-p-value-do-you-report-in-a-publication> *"
] |
[
"157 people agree with. But, even after a reasonable but substantial change, the",
"have changed over time; but rather to add new answers, or update existing",
"[Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe) > > > [I]t is a duplicate. Etiquette is not to re-ask",
"on the old question. [...] [EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers) > > > While I agree with",
"here. 1. By construction, the asker of the new question cannot add a",
"ones, on the old question. [...] [EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers) > > > While I agree",
"> 1 *Homo sapiens* is having a big impact. – Hivh Mop [13",
"editing of old answers seems misleading. People presumably upvoted A. Dinosaur's answer because",
"do not know the answer. **Is there anything that a user can do",
"new answer to an old question, that new answer won't be noticed if",
"answers seems misleading. People presumably upvoted A. Dinosaur's answer because they thought it",
"the answer. **Is there anything that a user can do to encourage new",
"> > +157 Giant lizards are the most important creatures on earth. –",
"[200M years ago] > > > 1 *Homo sapiens* is having a big",
"anything he might change it to in the future would be correct. An",
"put MOOCs on one's CV. The comments are: > > I would note",
"new question cannot add a new answer to the old question or update",
"answers. **How can new answers to old questions get noticed?** e.g., > >",
"to re-ask an old question for which the answer might have changed over",
"changed a small (very small) amount since 2012 though, particularly as several MOOCs",
"there anything that a user can do to encourage new answers to old",
"question for which the answer might have changed over time; but rather to",
"I would note that this was asked three years ago, [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in); I'm not",
"new answers to old questions** that has approximately the same force as adding",
"new question? 2. Even if somebody does post a new answer to an",
"change it to in the future would be correct. An unscrupulous dinosaur could,",
"as adding a new question? 2. Even if somebody does post a new",
"asking because they do not know the answer. **Is there anything that a",
"question. [...] [EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers) > > > While I agree with the points raised,",
"a duplicate. Etiquette is not to re-ask an old question for which the",
"an old question for which the answer might have changed over time; but",
"the score no longer represents the community's view of the current answer. **What",
"change, the score no longer represents the community's view of the current answer.",
"a small (very small) amount since 2012 though, particularly as several MOOCs move",
"the points raised, there are several problems here. 1. By construction, the asker",
"small (very small) amount since 2012 though, particularly as several MOOCs move closer",
"dinosaur could, for example, change his answer to \"The world is, in fact,",
"inspired by the close vote on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43423/10685), which asks whether one should",
"for example, change his answer to \"The world is, in fact, controlled by",
"> > > While I agree with the points raised, there are several",
"[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43423/10685), which asks whether one should put MOOCs on one's CV. The",
"if somebody does post a new answer to an old question, that new",
"change his answer to \"The world is, in fact, controlled by a cabal",
"the answer hasn't changed a small (very small) amount since 2012 though, particularly",
"to an old question, that new answer won't be noticed if there are",
"three years ago, [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in); I'm not sure if the answer hasn't changed a",
"years ago, [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in); I'm not sure if the answer hasn't changed a small",
"update existing ones, on the old question. [...] [EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers) > > > While",
"view of the current answer. **What should we do about high-scoring answers that",
"if the answer hasn't changed a small (very small) amount since 2012 though,",
"asker of the new question cannot add a new answer to the old",
"[EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers) > > > While I agree with the points raised, there are",
"reasonable but substantial change, the score no longer represents the community's view of",
"is, in fact, controlled by a cabal of blueberries\" which, now, apparently 157",
"[13 mins ago] > > > 3. Extensive editing of old answers seems",
"The comments are: > > I would note that this was asked three",
"thought that anything he might change it to in the future would be",
"that has approximately the same force as adding a new question? 2. Even",
"not sure if the answer hasn't changed a small (very small) amount since",
"existing answer: they are asking because they do not know the answer. **Is",
"[...] [EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers) > > > While I agree with the points raised, there",
"one should put MOOCs on one's CV. The comments are: > > I",
"> > > 3. Extensive editing of old answers seems misleading. People presumably",
"be noticed if there are high-scoring out-of-date answers. **How can new answers to",
"won't be noticed if there are high-scoring out-of-date answers. **How can new answers",
"answer. **What should we do about high-scoring answers that are no longer valid?**",
"problems here. 1. By construction, the asker of the new question cannot add",
"the old question. [...] [EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers) > > > While I agree with the",
"answer to the old question or update an existing answer: they are asking",
"– A. Dinosaur [200M years ago] > > > 1 *Homo sapiens* is",
"update an existing answer: they are asking because they do not know the",
"a user can do to encourage new answers to old questions** that has",
"I'm not sure if the answer hasn't changed a small (very small) amount",
"might change it to in the future would be correct. An unscrupulous dinosaur",
"that anything he might change it to in the future would be correct.",
"somebody does post a new answer to an old question, that new answer",
"years ago] > > > 1 *Homo sapiens* is having a big impact.",
"they thought that anything he might change it to in the future would",
"force as adding a new question? 2. Even if somebody does post a",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43423/10685), which asks whether one should put MOOCs on one's CV. The comments",
"thought it was correct, not because they thought that anything he might change",
"Dinosaur's answer because they thought it was correct, not because they thought that",
"should put MOOCs on one's CV. The comments are: > > I would",
"+157 Giant lizards are the most important creatures on earth. – A. Dinosaur",
"small) amount since 2012 though, particularly as several MOOCs move closer to a",
"substantial change, the score no longer represents the community's view of the current",
"mins ago] > > > 3. Extensive editing of old answers seems misleading.",
"they are asking because they do not know the answer. **Is there anything",
"question cannot add a new answer to the old question or update an",
"earth. – A. Dinosaur [200M years ago] > > > 1 *Homo sapiens*",
"to \"The world is, in fact, controlled by a cabal of blueberries\" which,",
"on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43423/10685), which asks whether one should put MOOCs on one's CV.",
"not to re-ask an old question for which the answer might have changed",
"creatures on earth. – A. Dinosaur [200M years ago] > > > 1",
"has approximately the same force as adding a new question? 2. Even if",
"as several MOOCs move closer to a kind of accreditation. [Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe) > >",
"old answers seems misleading. People presumably upvoted A. Dinosaur's answer because they thought",
"the new question cannot add a new answer to the old question or",
"An unscrupulous dinosaur could, for example, change his answer to \"The world is,",
"1. By construction, the asker of the new question cannot add a new",
"even after a reasonable but substantial change, the score no longer represents the",
"I agree with the points raised, there are several problems here. 1. By",
"answers, or update existing ones, on the old question. [...] [EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers) > >",
"comments are: > > I would note that this was asked three years",
"to in the future would be correct. An unscrupulous dinosaur could, for example,",
"questions get noticed?** e.g., > > +157 Giant lizards are the most important",
"that this was asked three years ago, [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in); I'm not sure if the",
"would be correct. An unscrupulous dinosaur could, for example, change his answer to",
"> > [I]t is a duplicate. Etiquette is not to re-ask an old",
"score no longer represents the community's view of the current answer. **What should",
"new answer to the old question or update an existing answer: they are",
"**Is there anything that a user can do to encourage new answers to",
"(very small) amount since 2012 though, particularly as several MOOCs move closer to",
"While I agree with the points raised, there are several problems here. 1.",
"A. Dinosaur's answer because they thought it was correct, not because they thought",
"2. Even if somebody does post a new answer to an old question,",
"sapiens* is having a big impact. – Hivh Mop [13 mins ago] >",
"blueberries\" which, now, apparently 157 people agree with. But, even after a reasonable",
"new answer won't be noticed if there are high-scoring out-of-date answers. **How can",
"This is inspired by the close vote on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43423/10685), which asks whether",
"correct, not because they thought that anything he might change it to in",
"fact, controlled by a cabal of blueberries\" which, now, apparently 157 people agree",
"know the answer. **Is there anything that a user can do to encourage",
"is not to re-ask an old question for which the answer might have",
"old question or update an existing answer: they are asking because they do",
"old question, that new answer won't be noticed if there are high-scoring out-of-date",
"Giant lizards are the most important creatures on earth. – A. Dinosaur [200M",
"move closer to a kind of accreditation. [Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe) > > > [I]t is",
"raised, there are several problems here. 1. By construction, the asker of the",
"to add new answers, or update existing ones, on the old question. [...]",
"an existing answer: they are asking because they do not know the answer.",
"But, even after a reasonable but substantial change, the score no longer represents",
"old question for which the answer might have changed over time; but rather",
"get noticed?** e.g., > > +157 Giant lizards are the most important creatures",
"2012 though, particularly as several MOOCs move closer to a kind of accreditation.",
"answer hasn't changed a small (very small) amount since 2012 though, particularly as",
"that new answer won't be noticed if there are high-scoring out-of-date answers. **How",
"answers to old questions get noticed?** e.g., > > +157 Giant lizards are",
"was asked three years ago, [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in); I'm not sure if the answer hasn't",
"apparently 157 people agree with. But, even after a reasonable but substantial change,",
"or update an existing answer: they are asking because they do not know",
"in fact, controlled by a cabal of blueberries\" which, now, apparently 157 people",
"vote on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43423/10685), which asks whether one should put MOOCs on one's",
"> > > 1 *Homo sapiens* is having a big impact. – Hivh",
"might have changed over time; but rather to add new answers, or update",
"same force as adding a new question? 2. Even if somebody does post",
"most important creatures on earth. – A. Dinosaur [200M years ago] > >",
"sure if the answer hasn't changed a small (very small) amount since 2012",
"lizards are the most important creatures on earth. – A. Dinosaur [200M years",
"answer. **Is there anything that a user can do to encourage new answers",
"they do not know the answer. **Is there anything that a user can",
"of old answers seems misleading. People presumably upvoted A. Dinosaur's answer because they",
"upvoted A. Dinosaur's answer because they thought it was correct, not because they",
"he might change it to in the future would be correct. An unscrupulous",
"answer to \"The world is, in fact, controlled by a cabal of blueberries\"",
"question? 2. Even if somebody does post a new answer to an old",
"does post a new answer to an old question, that new answer won't",
"answer to an old question, that new answer won't be noticed if there",
"\"The world is, in fact, controlled by a cabal of blueberries\" which, now,",
"questions** that has approximately the same force as adding a new question? 2.",
"> [I]t is a duplicate. Etiquette is not to re-ask an old question",
"are: > > I would note that this was asked three years ago,",
"seems misleading. People presumably upvoted A. Dinosaur's answer because they thought it was",
"particularly as several MOOCs move closer to a kind of accreditation. [Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe) >",
"no longer represents the community's view of the current answer. **What should we",
"Mop [13 mins ago] > > > 3. Extensive editing of old answers",
"the same force as adding a new question? 2. Even if somebody does",
"ago] > > > 1 *Homo sapiens* is having a big impact. –",
"which the answer might have changed over time; but rather to add new",
"are several problems here. 1. By construction, the asker of the new question",
"anything that a user can do to encourage new answers to old questions**",
"> > 3. Extensive editing of old answers seems misleading. People presumably upvoted",
"but substantial change, the score no longer represents the community's view of the",
"over time; but rather to add new answers, or update existing ones, on",
"time; but rather to add new answers, or update existing ones, on the",
"user can do to encourage new answers to old questions** that has approximately",
"by a cabal of blueberries\" which, now, apparently 157 people agree with. But,",
"answer might have changed over time; but rather to add new answers, or",
"re-ask an old question for which the answer might have changed over time;",
"of blueberries\" which, now, apparently 157 people agree with. But, even after a",
"to old questions** that has approximately the same force as adding a new",
"not because they thought that anything he might change it to in the",
"question or update an existing answer: they are asking because they do not",
"rather to add new answers, or update existing ones, on the old question.",
"> > While I agree with the points raised, there are several problems",
"there are several problems here. 1. By construction, the asker of the new",
"agree with. But, even after a reasonable but substantial change, the score no",
"kind of accreditation. [Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe) > > > [I]t is a duplicate. Etiquette is",
"community's view of the current answer. **What should we do about high-scoring answers",
"[I]t is a duplicate. Etiquette is not to re-ask an old question for",
"1 *Homo sapiens* is having a big impact. – Hivh Mop [13 mins",
"are asking because they do not know the answer. **Is there anything that",
"answer because they thought it was correct, not because they thought that anything",
"after a reasonable but substantial change, the score no longer represents the community's",
"current answer. **What should we do about high-scoring answers that are no longer",
"not know the answer. **Is there anything that a user can do to",
"A. Dinosaur [200M years ago] > > > 1 *Homo sapiens* is having",
"Etiquette is not to re-ask an old question for which the answer might",
"**How can new answers to old questions get noticed?** e.g., > > +157",
"be correct. An unscrupulous dinosaur could, for example, change his answer to \"The",
"the old question or update an existing answer: they are asking because they",
"> I would note that this was asked three years ago, [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in); I'm",
"a big impact. – Hivh Mop [13 mins ago] > > > 3.",
"accreditation. [Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe) > > > [I]t is a duplicate. Etiquette is not to",
"Even if somebody does post a new answer to an old question, that",
"though, particularly as several MOOCs move closer to a kind of accreditation. [Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe)",
"> > > [I]t is a duplicate. Etiquette is not to re-ask an",
"> +157 Giant lizards are the most important creatures on earth. – A.",
"Hivh Mop [13 mins ago] > > > 3. Extensive editing of old",
"CV. The comments are: > > I would note that this was asked",
"question, that new answer won't be noticed if there are high-scoring out-of-date answers.",
"answer won't be noticed if there are high-scoring out-of-date answers. **How can new",
"old question. [...] [EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers) > > > While I agree with the points",
"are high-scoring out-of-date answers. **How can new answers to old questions get noticed?**",
"add a new answer to the old question or update an existing answer:",
"agree with the points raised, there are several problems here. 1. By construction,",
"post a new answer to an old question, that new answer won't be",
"was correct, not because they thought that anything he might change it to",
"are the most important creatures on earth. – A. Dinosaur [200M years ago]",
"e.g., > > +157 Giant lizards are the most important creatures on earth.",
"out-of-date answers. **How can new answers to old questions get noticed?** e.g., >",
"which, now, apparently 157 people agree with. But, even after a reasonable but",
"*Homo sapiens* is having a big impact. – Hivh Mop [13 mins ago]",
"> 3. Extensive editing of old answers seems misleading. People presumably upvoted A.",
"several MOOCs move closer to a kind of accreditation. [Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe) > > >",
"asks whether one should put MOOCs on one's CV. The comments are: >",
"> > 1 *Homo sapiens* is having a big impact. – Hivh Mop",
"having a big impact. – Hivh Mop [13 mins ago] > > >",
"the future would be correct. An unscrupulous dinosaur could, for example, change his",
"do to encourage new answers to old questions** that has approximately the same",
"the close vote on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43423/10685), which asks whether one should put MOOCs",
"to a kind of accreditation. [Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe) > > > [I]t is a duplicate.",
"this was asked three years ago, [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in); I'm not sure if the answer",
"is a duplicate. Etiquette is not to re-ask an old question for which",
"People presumably upvoted A. Dinosaur's answer because they thought it was correct, not",
"controlled by a cabal of blueberries\" which, now, apparently 157 people agree with.",
"note that this was asked three years ago, [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in); I'm not sure if",
"represents the community's view of the current answer. **What should we do about",
"Dinosaur [200M years ago] > > > 1 *Homo sapiens* is having a",
"there are high-scoring out-of-date answers. **How can new answers to old questions get",
"to encourage new answers to old questions** that has approximately the same force",
"an old question, that new answer won't be noticed if there are high-scoring",
"it was correct, not because they thought that anything he might change it",
"points raised, there are several problems here. 1. By construction, the asker of",
"if there are high-scoring out-of-date answers. **How can new answers to old questions",
"with the points raised, there are several problems here. 1. By construction, the",
"his answer to \"The world is, in fact, controlled by a cabal of",
"but rather to add new answers, or update existing ones, on the old",
"people agree with. But, even after a reasonable but substantial change, the score",
"ago] > > > 3. Extensive editing of old answers seems misleading. People",
"the most important creatures on earth. – A. Dinosaur [200M years ago] >",
"high-scoring out-of-date answers. **How can new answers to old questions get noticed?** e.g.,",
"closer to a kind of accreditation. [Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe) > > > [I]t is a",
"of the new question cannot add a new answer to the old question",
"add new answers, or update existing ones, on the old question. [...] [EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers)",
"can do to encourage new answers to old questions** that has approximately the",
"future would be correct. An unscrupulous dinosaur could, for example, change his answer",
"cabal of blueberries\" which, now, apparently 157 people agree with. But, even after",
"that a user can do to encourage new answers to old questions** that",
"approximately the same force as adding a new question? 2. Even if somebody",
"MOOCs move closer to a kind of accreditation. [Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe) > > > [I]t",
"with. But, even after a reasonable but substantial change, the score no longer",
"can new answers to old questions get noticed?** e.g., > > +157 Giant",
"of accreditation. [Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe) > > > [I]t is a duplicate. Etiquette is not",
"construction, the asker of the new question cannot add a new answer to",
"> While I agree with the points raised, there are several problems here.",
"unscrupulous dinosaur could, for example, change his answer to \"The world is, in",
"the current answer. **What should we do about high-scoring answers that are no",
"to old questions get noticed?** e.g., > > +157 Giant lizards are the",
"adding a new question? 2. Even if somebody does post a new answer",
"answers to old questions** that has approximately the same force as adding a",
"since 2012 though, particularly as several MOOCs move closer to a kind of",
"or update existing ones, on the old question. [...] [EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers) > > >",
"answer: they are asking because they do not know the answer. **Is there",
"to the old question or update an existing answer: they are asking because",
"the asker of the new question cannot add a new answer to the",
"new answers, or update existing ones, on the old question. [...] [EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers) >",
"it to in the future would be correct. An unscrupulous dinosaur could, for",
"because they thought it was correct, not because they thought that anything he",
"world is, in fact, controlled by a cabal of blueberries\" which, now, apparently",
"which asks whether one should put MOOCs on one's CV. The comments are:",
"the answer might have changed over time; but rather to add new answers,",
"impact. – Hivh Mop [13 mins ago] > > > 3. Extensive editing",
"Extensive editing of old answers seems misleading. People presumably upvoted A. Dinosaur's answer",
"by the close vote on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43423/10685), which asks whether one should put",
"big impact. – Hivh Mop [13 mins ago] > > > 3. Extensive",
"close vote on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43423/10685), which asks whether one should put MOOCs on",
"a new answer to the old question or update an existing answer: they",
"because they do not know the answer. **Is there anything that a user",
"is inspired by the close vote on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43423/10685), which asks whether one",
"noticed if there are high-scoring out-of-date answers. **How can new answers to old",
"in the future would be correct. An unscrupulous dinosaur could, for example, change",
"– Hivh Mop [13 mins ago] > > > 3. Extensive editing of",
"important creatures on earth. – A. Dinosaur [200M years ago] > > >",
"a kind of accreditation. [Joe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/12346/joe) > > > [I]t is a duplicate. Etiquette",
"amount since 2012 though, particularly as several MOOCs move closer to a kind",
"presumably upvoted A. Dinosaur's answer because they thought it was correct, not because",
"now, apparently 157 people agree with. But, even after a reasonable but substantial",
"misleading. People presumably upvoted A. Dinosaur's answer because they thought it was correct,",
"changed over time; but rather to add new answers, or update existing ones,",
"on earth. – A. Dinosaur [200M years ago] > > > 1 *Homo",
"is having a big impact. – Hivh Mop [13 mins ago] > >",
"a new answer to an old question, that new answer won't be noticed",
"of the current answer. **What should we do about high-scoring answers that are",
"one's CV. The comments are: > > I would note that this was",
"could, for example, change his answer to \"The world is, in fact, controlled",
"encourage new answers to old questions** that has approximately the same force as",
"By construction, the asker of the new question cannot add a new answer",
"old questions** that has approximately the same force as adding a new question?",
"> > I would note that this was asked three years ago, [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in);",
"example, change his answer to \"The world is, in fact, controlled by a",
"existing ones, on the old question. [...] [EnergyNumbers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/96/energynumbers) > > > While I",
"noticed?** e.g., > > +157 Giant lizards are the most important creatures on",
"MOOCs on one's CV. The comments are: > > I would note that",
"several problems here. 1. By construction, the asker of the new question cannot",
"they thought it was correct, not because they thought that anything he might",
"correct. An unscrupulous dinosaur could, for example, change his answer to \"The world",
"the community's view of the current answer. **What should we do about high-scoring",
"for which the answer might have changed over time; but rather to add",
"[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in); I'm not sure if the answer hasn't changed a small (very small)",
"would note that this was asked three years ago, [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in); I'm not sure",
"new answers to old questions get noticed?** e.g., > > +157 Giant lizards",
"ago, [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in); I'm not sure if the answer hasn't changed a small (very",
"old questions get noticed?** e.g., > > +157 Giant lizards are the most",
"duplicate. Etiquette is not to re-ask an old question for which the answer",
"on one's CV. The comments are: > > I would note that this",
"a reasonable but substantial change, the score no longer represents the community's view",
"hasn't changed a small (very small) amount since 2012 though, particularly as several",
"a cabal of blueberries\" which, now, apparently 157 people agree with. But, even",
"longer represents the community's view of the current answer. **What should we do",
"cannot add a new answer to the old question or update an existing",
"because they thought that anything he might change it to in the future",
"asked three years ago, [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2336/can-i-include-the-completion-of-udacity-and-coursera-classes-i-have-attended-in); I'm not sure if the answer hasn't changed",
"whether one should put MOOCs on one's CV. The comments are: > >",
"3. Extensive editing of old answers seems misleading. People presumably upvoted A. Dinosaur's",
"a new question? 2. Even if somebody does post a new answer to"
] |
[
"a good question\" and/or \"I would also like to have an answer for",
"like to have an answer for it\". But sometimes these questions are (clearly)",
"my upvote as saying \"I consider this a good question\" and/or \"I would",
"So my question is: should I think about an upvote as \"good question",
"question\" and/or \"I would also like to have an answer for it\". But",
"the site. So my question is: should I think about an upvote as",
"\"good question AND on-topic\"? Am I creating more difficulties by upvoting an off-topic",
"an answer for it\". But sometimes these questions are (clearly) not a good",
"that I can strongly relate with. When this happens I tend to upvote",
"here on Academia that I find interesting, or that I can strongly relate",
"on Academia that I find interesting, or that I can strongly relate with.",
"it: I think of my upvote as saying \"I consider this a good",
"to upvote it: I think of my upvote as saying \"I consider this",
"along a question here on Academia that I find interesting, or that I",
"for it\". But sometimes these questions are (clearly) not a good fit for",
"tend to upvote it: I think of my upvote as saying \"I consider",
"on-topic\"? Am I creating more difficulties by upvoting an off-topic question? Or it",
"can strongly relate with. When this happens I tend to upvote it: I",
"(clearly) not a good fit for the site. So my question is: should",
"would also like to have an answer for it\". But sometimes these questions",
"as \"good question AND on-topic\"? Am I creating more difficulties by upvoting an",
"But sometimes these questions are (clearly) not a good fit for the site.",
"I come along a question here on Academia that I find interesting, or",
"and/or \"I would also like to have an answer for it\". But sometimes",
"an upvote as \"good question AND on-topic\"? Am I creating more difficulties by",
"of my upvote as saying \"I consider this a good question\" and/or \"I",
"a question here on Academia that I find interesting, or that I can",
"upvote as \"good question AND on-topic\"? Am I creating more difficulties by upvoting",
"is: should I think about an upvote as \"good question AND on-topic\"? Am",
"also like to have an answer for it\". But sometimes these questions are",
"this a good question\" and/or \"I would also like to have an answer",
"difficulties by upvoting an off-topic question? Or it just doesn't matter at all?",
"this happens I tend to upvote it: I think of my upvote as",
"think about an upvote as \"good question AND on-topic\"? Am I creating more",
"creating more difficulties by upvoting an off-topic question? Or it just doesn't matter",
"that I find interesting, or that I can strongly relate with. When this",
"with. When this happens I tend to upvote it: I think of my",
"relate with. When this happens I tend to upvote it: I think of",
"I tend to upvote it: I think of my upvote as saying \"I",
"fit for the site. So my question is: should I think about an",
"a good fit for the site. So my question is: should I think",
"sometimes these questions are (clearly) not a good fit for the site. So",
"are (clearly) not a good fit for the site. So my question is:",
"should I think about an upvote as \"good question AND on-topic\"? Am I",
"upvote as saying \"I consider this a good question\" and/or \"I would also",
"find interesting, or that I can strongly relate with. When this happens I",
"I creating more difficulties by upvoting an off-topic question? Or it just doesn't",
"upvote it: I think of my upvote as saying \"I consider this a",
"for the site. So my question is: should I think about an upvote",
"good fit for the site. So my question is: should I think about",
"not a good fit for the site. So my question is: should I",
"AND on-topic\"? Am I creating more difficulties by upvoting an off-topic question? Or",
"it\". But sometimes these questions are (clearly) not a good fit for the",
"I think about an upvote as \"good question AND on-topic\"? Am I creating",
"about an upvote as \"good question AND on-topic\"? Am I creating more difficulties",
"come along a question here on Academia that I find interesting, or that",
"happens I tend to upvote it: I think of my upvote as saying",
"interesting, or that I can strongly relate with. When this happens I tend",
"question AND on-topic\"? Am I creating more difficulties by upvoting an off-topic question?",
"or that I can strongly relate with. When this happens I tend to",
"my question is: should I think about an upvote as \"good question AND",
"strongly relate with. When this happens I tend to upvote it: I think",
"to have an answer for it\". But sometimes these questions are (clearly) not",
"question here on Academia that I find interesting, or that I can strongly",
"I can strongly relate with. When this happens I tend to upvote it:",
"\"I would also like to have an answer for it\". But sometimes these",
"question is: should I think about an upvote as \"good question AND on-topic\"?",
"\"I consider this a good question\" and/or \"I would also like to have",
"When this happens I tend to upvote it: I think of my upvote",
"more difficulties by upvoting an off-topic question? Or it just doesn't matter at",
"think of my upvote as saying \"I consider this a good question\" and/or",
"these questions are (clearly) not a good fit for the site. So my",
"Am I creating more difficulties by upvoting an off-topic question? Or it just",
"Sometimes, I come along a question here on Academia that I find interesting,",
"have an answer for it\". But sometimes these questions are (clearly) not a",
"Academia that I find interesting, or that I can strongly relate with. When",
"answer for it\". But sometimes these questions are (clearly) not a good fit",
"good question\" and/or \"I would also like to have an answer for it\".",
"saying \"I consider this a good question\" and/or \"I would also like to",
"site. So my question is: should I think about an upvote as \"good",
"consider this a good question\" and/or \"I would also like to have an",
"as saying \"I consider this a good question\" and/or \"I would also like",
"questions are (clearly) not a good fit for the site. So my question",
"I think of my upvote as saying \"I consider this a good question\"",
"I find interesting, or that I can strongly relate with. When this happens"
] |
[
"math, able to deep research, etc). Is this kind of question on topic",
"a job. This job is outside academia, but require many academia skills (such",
"as math, able to deep research, etc). Is this kind of question on",
"for a job. This job is outside academia, but require many academia skills",
"seeking for a job. This job is outside academia, but require many academia",
"skills (such as math, able to deep research, etc). Is this kind of",
"on topic here? If not, is there a site should I ask instead?",
"able to deep research, etc). Is this kind of question on topic here?",
"job. This job is outside academia, but require many academia skills (such as",
"research, etc). Is this kind of question on topic here? If not, is",
"to ask a question about seeking for a job. This job is outside",
"to deep research, etc). Is this kind of question on topic here? If",
"deep research, etc). Is this kind of question on topic here? If not,",
"about seeking for a job. This job is outside academia, but require many",
"Is this kind of question on topic here? If not, is there a",
"would like to ask a question about seeking for a job. This job",
"of question on topic here? If not, is there a site should I",
"but require many academia skills (such as math, able to deep research, etc).",
"question about seeking for a job. This job is outside academia, but require",
"kind of question on topic here? If not, is there a site should",
"require many academia skills (such as math, able to deep research, etc). Is",
"ask a question about seeking for a job. This job is outside academia,",
"this kind of question on topic here? If not, is there a site",
"a question about seeking for a job. This job is outside academia, but",
"is outside academia, but require many academia skills (such as math, able to",
"academia skills (such as math, able to deep research, etc). Is this kind",
"I would like to ask a question about seeking for a job. This",
"etc). Is this kind of question on topic here? If not, is there",
"(such as math, able to deep research, etc). Is this kind of question",
"many academia skills (such as math, able to deep research, etc). Is this",
"academia, but require many academia skills (such as math, able to deep research,",
"question on topic here? If not, is there a site should I ask",
"like to ask a question about seeking for a job. This job is",
"This job is outside academia, but require many academia skills (such as math,",
"job is outside academia, but require many academia skills (such as math, able",
"outside academia, but require many academia skills (such as math, able to deep"
] |
[
"specific situation, and it's likely that only someone with a good understanding of",
"the issue. Right now, we have two custom close reasons that are very",
"too localized? > > > and > > This question appears to be",
"kinds of questions are too localized? > > > and > > This",
"of your situation will be able to provide an objectively correct answer. >",
"We cannot offer recommendations or rankings of specific programs, courses, universities, or other",
"others in similar situations are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can",
"seems to seek specific advice for a very specific situation, and it's likely",
"situations, see: What kinds of questions are too localized? > > > and",
"similar to one another in scope: > > Questions that cannot be generalized",
"to revisit the issue. Right now, we have two custom close reasons that",
"which one of these could apply, but the other couldn't. [The other close",
"been looked at, but I think that it's appropriate to revisit the issue.",
"it's appropriate to revisit the issue. Right now, we have two custom close",
"to others in similar situations are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that",
"have two custom close reasons that are very similar to one another in",
"> > > I can't see any situation in which one of these",
"custom close reasons that are very similar to one another in scope: >",
"find myself using a variant on the \"shopping question\" tag a lot more",
"in scope: > > Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to others",
"appropriate to revisit the issue. Right now, we have two custom close reasons",
"> > and > > This question appears to be off-topic because it",
"of questions are too localized? > > > and > > This question",
"specific programs, courses, universities, or other similar requests, as these are primarily opinion-based.",
"to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are too",
"because it seems to seek specific advice for a very specific situation, and",
"situation in which one of these could apply, but the other couldn't. [The",
"similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are too localized? > > >",
"of these could apply, but the other couldn't. [The other close reason is",
"very similar to one another in scope: > > Questions that cannot be",
"questions that can apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds",
"only someone with a good understanding of your situation will be able to",
"advice for a very specific situation, and it's likely that only someone with",
"> > I can't see any situation in which one of these could",
"lot more frequently. I would recommend replacing one of the tags above with",
"these have been looked at, but I think that it's appropriate to revisit",
"of the tags above with something such as: > > We cannot offer",
"likely that only someone with a good understanding of your situation will be",
"offer recommendations or rankings of specific programs, courses, universities, or other similar requests,",
"be able to provide an objectively correct answer. > > > I can't",
"be off-topic because it seems to seek specific advice for a very specific",
"often overused \"Undergraduate\" reason.] Personally, I find myself using a variant on the",
"> > We cannot offer recommendations or rankings of specific programs, courses, universities,",
"multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are too localized?",
"and > > This question appears to be off-topic because it seems to",
"courses, universities, or other similar requests, as these are primarily opinion-based. > >",
"looked at, but I think that it's appropriate to revisit the issue. Right",
"very specific situation, and it's likely that only someone with a good understanding",
"[The other close reason is the often overused \"Undergraduate\" reason.] Personally, I find",
"overused \"Undergraduate\" reason.] Personally, I find myself using a variant on the \"shopping",
"to apply to others in similar situations are off-topic. For assistance in writing",
"can apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions",
"that are very similar to one another in scope: > > Questions that",
"since these have been looked at, but I think that it's appropriate to",
"assistance in writing questions that can apply to multiple people facing similar situations,",
"people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are too localized? >",
"tags above with something such as: > > We cannot offer recommendations or",
"and it's likely that only someone with a good understanding of your situation",
"variant on the \"shopping question\" tag a lot more frequently. I would recommend",
"that only someone with a good understanding of your situation will be able",
"couldn't. [The other close reason is the often overused \"Undergraduate\" reason.] Personally, I",
"for a very specific situation, and it's likely that only someone with a",
"it seems to seek specific advice for a very specific situation, and it's",
"cannot be generalized to apply to others in similar situations are off-topic. For",
"but I think that it's appropriate to revisit the issue. Right now, we",
"that it's appropriate to revisit the issue. Right now, we have two custom",
"situations are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can apply to multiple",
"> Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to others in similar situations",
"to be off-topic because it seems to seek specific advice for a very",
"the tags above with something such as: > > We cannot offer recommendations",
"with something such as: > > We cannot offer recommendations or rankings of",
"objectively correct answer. > > > I can't see any situation in which",
"Personally, I find myself using a variant on the \"shopping question\" tag a",
"writing questions that can apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What",
"see: What kinds of questions are too localized? > > > and >",
"in similar situations are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can apply",
"situation will be able to provide an objectively correct answer. > > >",
"other close reason is the often overused \"Undergraduate\" reason.] Personally, I find myself",
"\"Undergraduate\" reason.] Personally, I find myself using a variant on the \"shopping question\"",
"facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are too localized? > >",
"a while since these have been looked at, but I think that it's",
"on the \"shopping question\" tag a lot more frequently. I would recommend replacing",
"of specific programs, courses, universities, or other similar requests, as these are primarily",
"are too localized? > > > and > > This question appears to",
"or rankings of specific programs, courses, universities, or other similar requests, as these",
"apply, but the other couldn't. [The other close reason is the often overused",
"your situation will be able to provide an objectively correct answer. > >",
"> > > and > > This question appears to be off-topic because",
"I can't see any situation in which one of these could apply, but",
"myself using a variant on the \"shopping question\" tag a lot more frequently.",
"one of these could apply, but the other couldn't. [The other close reason",
"reason.] Personally, I find myself using a variant on the \"shopping question\" tag",
"apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of questions are",
"an objectively correct answer. > > > I can't see any situation in",
"tag a lot more frequently. I would recommend replacing one of the tags",
"it's likely that only someone with a good understanding of your situation will",
"as: > > We cannot offer recommendations or rankings of specific programs, courses,",
"a variant on the \"shopping question\" tag a lot more frequently. I would",
"frequently. I would recommend replacing one of the tags above with something such",
"apply to others in similar situations are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions",
"these could apply, but the other couldn't. [The other close reason is the",
"something such as: > > We cannot offer recommendations or rankings of specific",
"while since these have been looked at, but I think that it's appropriate",
"I would recommend replacing one of the tags above with something such as:",
"\"shopping question\" tag a lot more frequently. I would recommend replacing one of",
"with a good understanding of your situation will be able to provide an",
"understanding of your situation will be able to provide an objectively correct answer.",
"one another in scope: > > Questions that cannot be generalized to apply",
"the often overused \"Undergraduate\" reason.] Personally, I find myself using a variant on",
"close reason is the often overused \"Undergraduate\" reason.] Personally, I find myself using",
"a lot more frequently. I would recommend replacing one of the tags above",
"> > This question appears to be off-topic because it seems to seek",
"have been looked at, but I think that it's appropriate to revisit the",
"in writing questions that can apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see:",
"one of the tags above with something such as: > > We cannot",
"any situation in which one of these could apply, but the other couldn't.",
"above with something such as: > > We cannot offer recommendations or rankings",
"in which one of these could apply, but the other couldn't. [The other",
"that cannot be generalized to apply to others in similar situations are off-topic.",
"to provide an objectively correct answer. > > > I can't see any",
"recommend replacing one of the tags above with something such as: > >",
"universities, or other similar requests, as these are primarily opinion-based. > > >",
"think that it's appropriate to revisit the issue. Right now, we have two",
"What kinds of questions are too localized? > > > and > >",
"other couldn't. [The other close reason is the often overused \"Undergraduate\" reason.] Personally,",
"using a variant on the \"shopping question\" tag a lot more frequently. I",
"now, we have two custom close reasons that are very similar to one",
"can't see any situation in which one of these could apply, but the",
"Right now, we have two custom close reasons that are very similar to",
"This question appears to be off-topic because it seems to seek specific advice",
"the other couldn't. [The other close reason is the often overused \"Undergraduate\" reason.]",
"questions are too localized? > > > and > > This question appears",
"to one another in scope: > > Questions that cannot be generalized to",
"the \"shopping question\" tag a lot more frequently. I would recommend replacing one",
"off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can apply to multiple people facing",
"situation, and it's likely that only someone with a good understanding of your",
"> I can't see any situation in which one of these could apply,",
"It's been a while since these have been looked at, but I think",
"> > Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to others in similar",
"provide an objectively correct answer. > > > I can't see any situation",
"I find myself using a variant on the \"shopping question\" tag a lot",
"rankings of specific programs, courses, universities, or other similar requests, as these are",
"been a while since these have been looked at, but I think that",
"replacing one of the tags above with something such as: > > We",
"be generalized to apply to others in similar situations are off-topic. For assistance",
"> and > > This question appears to be off-topic because it seems",
"such as: > > We cannot offer recommendations or rankings of specific programs,",
"I think that it's appropriate to revisit the issue. Right now, we have",
"see any situation in which one of these could apply, but the other",
"appears to be off-topic because it seems to seek specific advice for a",
"will be able to provide an objectively correct answer. > > > I",
"could apply, but the other couldn't. [The other close reason is the often",
"For assistance in writing questions that can apply to multiple people facing similar",
"> We cannot offer recommendations or rankings of specific programs, courses, universities, or",
"reasons that are very similar to one another in scope: > > Questions",
"more frequently. I would recommend replacing one of the tags above with something",
"a good understanding of your situation will be able to provide an objectively",
"programs, courses, universities, or other similar requests, as these are primarily opinion-based. >",
"someone with a good understanding of your situation will be able to provide",
"seek specific advice for a very specific situation, and it's likely that only",
"answer. > > > I can't see any situation in which one of",
"we have two custom close reasons that are very similar to one another",
"similar situations are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can apply to",
"two custom close reasons that are very similar to one another in scope:",
"issue. Right now, we have two custom close reasons that are very similar",
"good understanding of your situation will be able to provide an objectively correct",
"but the other couldn't. [The other close reason is the often overused \"Undergraduate\"",
"would recommend replacing one of the tags above with something such as: >",
"Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to others in similar situations are",
"at, but I think that it's appropriate to revisit the issue. Right now,",
"a very specific situation, and it's likely that only someone with a good",
"cannot offer recommendations or rankings of specific programs, courses, universities, or other similar",
"> This question appears to be off-topic because it seems to seek specific",
"is the often overused \"Undergraduate\" reason.] Personally, I find myself using a variant",
"correct answer. > > > I can't see any situation in which one",
"generalized to apply to others in similar situations are off-topic. For assistance in",
"that can apply to multiple people facing similar situations, see: What kinds of",
"reason is the often overused \"Undergraduate\" reason.] Personally, I find myself using a",
"recommendations or rankings of specific programs, courses, universities, or other similar requests, as",
"close reasons that are very similar to one another in scope: > >",
"question appears to be off-topic because it seems to seek specific advice for",
"revisit the issue. Right now, we have two custom close reasons that are",
"off-topic because it seems to seek specific advice for a very specific situation,",
"localized? > > > and > > This question appears to be off-topic",
"are off-topic. For assistance in writing questions that can apply to multiple people",
"able to provide an objectively correct answer. > > > I can't see",
"to seek specific advice for a very specific situation, and it's likely that",
"specific advice for a very specific situation, and it's likely that only someone",
"question\" tag a lot more frequently. I would recommend replacing one of the",
"are very similar to one another in scope: > > Questions that cannot",
"scope: > > Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to others in",
"another in scope: > > Questions that cannot be generalized to apply to"
] |
[
"of prof and people in mathematics(and other fields too) have their own webpages.",
"as \"Should there be a like button in your academic webpage or blog?\"",
"there can be a lot of questions that relate to academic blogging such",
"their own webpages. Now there can be a lot of questions that relate",
"own webpages. Now there can be a lot of questions that relate to",
"can be a lot of questions that relate to academic blogging such as",
"to academic blogging such as \"Should there be a like button in your",
"fields too) have their own webpages. Now there can be a lot of",
"and people in mathematics(and other fields too) have their own webpages. Now there",
"in mathematics(and other fields too) have their own webpages. Now there can be",
"of questions that relate to academic blogging such as \"Should there be a",
"a lot of questions that relate to academic blogging such as \"Should there",
"blogging such as \"Should there be a like button in your academic webpage",
"academic blogging such as \"Should there be a like button in your academic",
"that relate to academic blogging such as \"Should there be a like button",
"questions that relate to academic blogging such as \"Should there be a like",
"relate to academic blogging such as \"Should there be a like button in",
"lot of questions that relate to academic blogging such as \"Should there be",
"such as \"Should there be a like button in your academic webpage or",
"other fields too) have their own webpages. Now there can be a lot",
"Now there can be a lot of questions that relate to academic blogging",
"have their own webpages. Now there can be a lot of questions that",
"mathematics(and other fields too) have their own webpages. Now there can be a",
"people in mathematics(and other fields too) have their own webpages. Now there can",
"webpages. Now there can be a lot of questions that relate to academic",
"lot of prof and people in mathematics(and other fields too) have their own",
"A lot of prof and people in mathematics(and other fields too) have their",
"too) have their own webpages. Now there can be a lot of questions",
"be a lot of questions that relate to academic blogging such as \"Should",
"prof and people in mathematics(and other fields too) have their own webpages. Now"
] |
[
"was heavily down voted. I am not fairly convinced that the question that",
"> [Avoid spam filters when applying for academic internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships) > > > However,",
"undergraduate academic internships. > > [Avoid spam filters when applying for academic internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships)",
"recently asked a question that was heavily down voted. I am not fairly",
"heavily down voted. I am not fairly convinced that the question that I",
"when applying for academic internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships) > > > However, it applies to all",
"provide a link to a question that was based on undergraduate academic internships.",
"a question that was based on undergraduate academic internships. > > [Avoid spam",
"topic. I happen to provide a link to a question that was based",
"asked a question that was heavily down voted. I am not fairly convinced",
"question that was heavily down voted. I am not fairly convinced that the",
"that was heavily down voted. I am not fairly convinced that the question",
"happen to provide a link to a question that was based on undergraduate",
"link to a question that was based on undergraduate academic internships. > >",
"to a question that was based on undergraduate academic internships. > > [Avoid",
"I am not fairly convinced that the question that I asked was indeed",
"[Avoid spam filters when applying for academic internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships) > > > However, it",
"was indeed off topic. I happen to provide a link to a question",
"> > However, it applies to all the students from masters courses too",
"the question that I asked was indeed off topic. I happen to provide",
"that I asked was indeed off topic. I happen to provide a link",
"voted. I am not fairly convinced that the question that I asked was",
"a link to a question that was based on undergraduate academic internships. >",
"not fairly convinced that the question that I asked was indeed off topic.",
"question that was based on undergraduate academic internships. > > [Avoid spam filters",
"applying for academic internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships) > > > However, it applies to all the",
"academic internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships) > > > However, it applies to all the students from",
"> > > However, it applies to all the students from masters courses",
"that was based on undergraduate academic internships. > > [Avoid spam filters when",
"> However, it applies to all the students from masters courses too and",
"However, it applies to all the students from masters courses too and not",
"based on undergraduate academic internships. > > [Avoid spam filters when applying for",
"fairly convinced that the question that I asked was indeed off topic. I",
"asked was indeed off topic. I happen to provide a link to a",
"to provide a link to a question that was based on undergraduate academic",
"for academic internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships) > > > However, it applies to all the students",
"> > [Avoid spam filters when applying for academic internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships) > > >",
"indeed off topic. I happen to provide a link to a question that",
"it applies to all the students from masters courses too and not just",
"I happen to provide a link to a question that was based on",
"convinced that the question that I asked was indeed off topic. I happen",
"applies to all the students from masters courses too and not just undergrad",
"I asked was indeed off topic. I happen to provide a link to",
"I recently asked a question that was heavily down voted. I am not",
"internships. > > [Avoid spam filters when applying for academic internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships) > >",
"a question that was heavily down voted. I am not fairly convinced that",
"off topic. I happen to provide a link to a question that was",
"was based on undergraduate academic internships. > > [Avoid spam filters when applying",
"on undergraduate academic internships. > > [Avoid spam filters when applying for academic",
"down voted. I am not fairly convinced that the question that I asked",
"spam filters when applying for academic internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships) > > > However, it applies",
"am not fairly convinced that the question that I asked was indeed off",
"filters when applying for academic internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships) > > > However, it applies to",
"that the question that I asked was indeed off topic. I happen to",
"internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships) > > > However, it applies to all the students from masters",
"academic internships. > > [Avoid spam filters when applying for academic internships](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45577/avoid-spam-filters-when-applying-for-academc-internships) >",
"question that I asked was indeed off topic. I happen to provide a",
"to all the students from masters courses too and not just undergrad students."
] |
[
"\"curriculum.\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45599/what-is-a-curriculum) The user was curious why the question was closed, and I'm posting",
"A user recently posted [this question about the definition of \"curriculum.\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45599/what-is-a-curriculum) The user",
"posted [this question about the definition of \"curriculum.\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45599/what-is-a-curriculum) The user was curious why",
"user was curious why the question was closed, and I'm posting this question",
"the definition of \"curriculum.\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45599/what-is-a-curriculum) The user was curious why the question was closed,",
"[this question about the definition of \"curriculum.\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45599/what-is-a-curriculum) The user was curious why the",
"user recently posted [this question about the definition of \"curriculum.\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45599/what-is-a-curriculum) The user was",
"about the definition of \"curriculum.\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45599/what-is-a-curriculum) The user was curious why the question was",
"definition of \"curriculum.\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45599/what-is-a-curriculum) The user was curious why the question was closed, and",
"of \"curriculum.\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45599/what-is-a-curriculum) The user was curious why the question was closed, and I'm",
"was curious why the question was closed, and I'm posting this question to",
"recently posted [this question about the definition of \"curriculum.\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45599/what-is-a-curriculum) The user was curious",
"curious why the question was closed, and I'm posting this question to hopefully",
"why the question was closed, and I'm posting this question to hopefully provide",
"the question was closed, and I'm posting this question to hopefully provide answers.",
"The user was curious why the question was closed, and I'm posting this",
"question about the definition of \"curriculum.\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/45599/what-is-a-curriculum) The user was curious why the question"
] |
[
"articulate an additional question. On the flip side (and this is what motivated",
"But I'm trying to figure out how things work here, so for the",
"mine. His style is more authoritative than mine, but we are using the",
"It gets several upvotes. Then someone with a fancy academic position and a",
"need to be patient and slowly amass more points? (Please note, I do",
"more points? (Please note, I do realize there may be more differences between",
"a massive reputation score comes along and writes an answer which is (in",
"essentially equivalent to mine. His style is more authoritative than mine, but we",
"(in my opinion, of course!) essentially equivalent to mine. His style is more",
"be more differences between our answers than what I myself was able to",
"argument, could you please try to give an answer based on my premise?",
"this is what motivated my inquiries): Suppose I have written a careful answer",
"to mine. His style is more authoritative than mine, but we are using",
"need to articulate an additional question. On the flip side (and this is",
"and slowly amass more points? (Please note, I do realize there may be",
"position and a massive reputation score comes along and writes an answer which",
"the flip side (and this is what motivated my inquiries): Suppose I have",
"more authoritative than mine, but we are using the same logic and reach",
"His answer gets upvoted like crazy. Is there anything I can do about",
"realize I need to articulate an additional question. On the flip side (and",
"comes along and writes an answer which is (in my opinion, of course!)",
"mine, but we are using the same logic and reach the same conclusion.",
"careful answer to a question. It gets several upvotes. Then someone with a",
"SE system? Do I just need to be patient and slowly amass more",
"points? (Please note, I do realize there may be more differences between our",
"Do I just need to be patient and slowly amass more points? (Please",
"a question. It gets several upvotes. Then someone with a fancy academic position",
"Then someone with a fancy academic position and a massive reputation score comes",
"answer and some helpful comments to my other question, I realize I need",
"the same conclusion. Neither one of us cites any links. His answer gets",
"could you please try to give an answer based on my premise? Thanks.)",
"helpful answer and some helpful comments to my other question, I realize I",
"and a massive reputation score comes along and writes an answer which is",
"in my own thinking? Or is this a perfectly ethical artifact of the",
"Neither one of us cites any links. His answer gets upvoted like crazy.",
"I can do about it? Can I at least take the moral high",
"at least take the moral high ground in my own thinking? Or is",
"I do realize there may be more differences between our answers than what",
"an answer which is (in my opinion, of course!) essentially equivalent to mine.",
"additional question. On the flip side (and this is what motivated my inquiries):",
"so for the sake of argument, could you please try to give an",
"between our answers than what I myself was able to perceive. But I'm",
"an additional question. On the flip side (and this is what motivated my",
"someone with a fancy academic position and a massive reputation score comes along",
"the same logic and reach the same conclusion. Neither one of us cites",
"same conclusion. Neither one of us cites any links. His answer gets upvoted",
"Is there anything I can do about it? Can I at least take",
"about it? Can I at least take the moral high ground in my",
"this a perfectly ethical artifact of the SE system? Do I just need",
"of the SE system? Do I just need to be patient and slowly",
"perfectly ethical artifact of the SE system? Do I just need to be",
"question. It gets several upvotes. Then someone with a fancy academic position and",
"realize there may be more differences between our answers than what I myself",
"a careful answer to a question. It gets several upvotes. Then someone with",
"sake of argument, could you please try to give an answer based on",
"patient and slowly amass more points? (Please note, I do realize there may",
"conclusion. Neither one of us cites any links. His answer gets upvoted like",
"to a question. It gets several upvotes. Then someone with a fancy academic",
"work here, so for the sake of argument, could you please try to",
"This question is related to [Answering etiquette](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1753/answering-etiquette?noredirect=1#comment7510_1753) After a helpful answer and some",
"than what I myself was able to perceive. But I'm trying to figure",
"and reach the same conclusion. Neither one of us cites any links. His",
"what I myself was able to perceive. But I'm trying to figure out",
"least take the moral high ground in my own thinking? Or is this",
"is more authoritative than mine, but we are using the same logic and",
"other question, I realize I need to articulate an additional question. On the",
"to be patient and slowly amass more points? (Please note, I do realize",
"note, I do realize there may be more differences between our answers than",
"do realize there may be more differences between our answers than what I",
"ethical artifact of the SE system? Do I just need to be patient",
"of argument, could you please try to give an answer based on my",
"I at least take the moral high ground in my own thinking? Or",
"there may be more differences between our answers than what I myself was",
"Can I at least take the moral high ground in my own thinking?",
"course!) essentially equivalent to mine. His style is more authoritative than mine, but",
"of us cites any links. His answer gets upvoted like crazy. Is there",
"authoritative than mine, but we are using the same logic and reach the",
"to my other question, I realize I need to articulate an additional question.",
"more differences between our answers than what I myself was able to perceive.",
"gets upvoted like crazy. Is there anything I can do about it? Can",
"style is more authoritative than mine, but we are using the same logic",
"the SE system? Do I just need to be patient and slowly amass",
"comments to my other question, I realize I need to articulate an additional",
"to articulate an additional question. On the flip side (and this is what",
"reputation score comes along and writes an answer which is (in my opinion,",
"the moral high ground in my own thinking? Or is this a perfectly",
"us cites any links. His answer gets upvoted like crazy. Is there anything",
"my own thinking? Or is this a perfectly ethical artifact of the SE",
"(and this is what motivated my inquiries): Suppose I have written a careful",
"question is related to [Answering etiquette](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1753/answering-etiquette?noredirect=1#comment7510_1753) After a helpful answer and some helpful",
"His style is more authoritative than mine, but we are using the same",
"are using the same logic and reach the same conclusion. Neither one of",
"was able to perceive. But I'm trying to figure out how things work",
"and writes an answer which is (in my opinion, of course!) essentially equivalent",
"I have written a careful answer to a question. It gets several upvotes.",
"writes an answer which is (in my opinion, of course!) essentially equivalent to",
"logic and reach the same conclusion. Neither one of us cites any links.",
"do about it? Can I at least take the moral high ground in",
"for the sake of argument, could you please try to give an answer",
"anything I can do about it? Can I at least take the moral",
"is what motivated my inquiries): Suppose I have written a careful answer to",
"ground in my own thinking? Or is this a perfectly ethical artifact of",
"crazy. Is there anything I can do about it? Can I at least",
"and some helpful comments to my other question, I realize I need to",
"artifact of the SE system? Do I just need to be patient and",
"my opinion, of course!) essentially equivalent to mine. His style is more authoritative",
"amass more points? (Please note, I do realize there may be more differences",
"any links. His answer gets upvoted like crazy. Is there anything I can",
"I'm trying to figure out how things work here, so for the sake",
"same logic and reach the same conclusion. Neither one of us cites any",
"I myself was able to perceive. But I'm trying to figure out how",
"links. His answer gets upvoted like crazy. Is there anything I can do",
"question. On the flip side (and this is what motivated my inquiries): Suppose",
"using the same logic and reach the same conclusion. Neither one of us",
"a perfectly ethical artifact of the SE system? Do I just need to",
"can do about it? Can I at least take the moral high ground",
"here, so for the sake of argument, could you please try to give",
"to figure out how things work here, so for the sake of argument,",
"helpful comments to my other question, I realize I need to articulate an",
"like crazy. Is there anything I can do about it? Can I at",
"After a helpful answer and some helpful comments to my other question, I",
"Suppose I have written a careful answer to a question. It gets several",
"slowly amass more points? (Please note, I do realize there may be more",
"how things work here, so for the sake of argument, could you please",
"trying to figure out how things work here, so for the sake of",
"a fancy academic position and a massive reputation score comes along and writes",
"massive reputation score comes along and writes an answer which is (in my",
"differences between our answers than what I myself was able to perceive. But",
"just need to be patient and slowly amass more points? (Please note, I",
"take the moral high ground in my own thinking? Or is this a",
"my other question, I realize I need to articulate an additional question. On",
"upvoted like crazy. Is there anything I can do about it? Can I",
"score comes along and writes an answer which is (in my opinion, of",
"may be more differences between our answers than what I myself was able",
"to [Answering etiquette](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1753/answering-etiquette?noredirect=1#comment7510_1753) After a helpful answer and some helpful comments to my",
"answer which is (in my opinion, of course!) essentially equivalent to mine. His",
"answers than what I myself was able to perceive. But I'm trying to",
"academic position and a massive reputation score comes along and writes an answer",
"some helpful comments to my other question, I realize I need to articulate",
"[Answering etiquette](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1753/answering-etiquette?noredirect=1#comment7510_1753) After a helpful answer and some helpful comments to my other",
"what motivated my inquiries): Suppose I have written a careful answer to a",
"of course!) essentially equivalent to mine. His style is more authoritative than mine,",
"it? Can I at least take the moral high ground in my own",
"myself was able to perceive. But I'm trying to figure out how things",
"flip side (and this is what motivated my inquiries): Suppose I have written",
"fancy academic position and a massive reputation score comes along and writes an",
"opinion, of course!) essentially equivalent to mine. His style is more authoritative than",
"the sake of argument, could you please try to give an answer based",
"written a careful answer to a question. It gets several upvotes. Then someone",
"there anything I can do about it? Can I at least take the",
"but we are using the same logic and reach the same conclusion. Neither",
"cites any links. His answer gets upvoted like crazy. Is there anything I",
"figure out how things work here, so for the sake of argument, could",
"we are using the same logic and reach the same conclusion. Neither one",
"my inquiries): Suppose I have written a careful answer to a question. It",
"one of us cites any links. His answer gets upvoted like crazy. Is",
"answer gets upvoted like crazy. Is there anything I can do about it?",
"On the flip side (and this is what motivated my inquiries): Suppose I",
"than mine, but we are using the same logic and reach the same",
"perceive. But I'm trying to figure out how things work here, so for",
"(Please note, I do realize there may be more differences between our answers",
"which is (in my opinion, of course!) essentially equivalent to mine. His style",
"I just need to be patient and slowly amass more points? (Please note,",
"inquiries): Suppose I have written a careful answer to a question. It gets",
"gets several upvotes. Then someone with a fancy academic position and a massive",
"I need to articulate an additional question. On the flip side (and this",
"is this a perfectly ethical artifact of the SE system? Do I just",
"I realize I need to articulate an additional question. On the flip side",
"motivated my inquiries): Suppose I have written a careful answer to a question.",
"with a fancy academic position and a massive reputation score comes along and",
"along and writes an answer which is (in my opinion, of course!) essentially",
"several upvotes. Then someone with a fancy academic position and a massive reputation",
"side (and this is what motivated my inquiries): Suppose I have written a",
"answer to a question. It gets several upvotes. Then someone with a fancy",
"high ground in my own thinking? Or is this a perfectly ethical artifact",
"related to [Answering etiquette](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1753/answering-etiquette?noredirect=1#comment7510_1753) After a helpful answer and some helpful comments to",
"system? Do I just need to be patient and slowly amass more points?",
"our answers than what I myself was able to perceive. But I'm trying",
"is related to [Answering etiquette](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1753/answering-etiquette?noredirect=1#comment7510_1753) After a helpful answer and some helpful comments",
"have written a careful answer to a question. It gets several upvotes. Then",
"things work here, so for the sake of argument, could you please try",
"own thinking? Or is this a perfectly ethical artifact of the SE system?",
"moral high ground in my own thinking? Or is this a perfectly ethical",
"is (in my opinion, of course!) essentially equivalent to mine. His style is",
"upvotes. Then someone with a fancy academic position and a massive reputation score",
"able to perceive. But I'm trying to figure out how things work here,",
"question, I realize I need to articulate an additional question. On the flip",
"Or is this a perfectly ethical artifact of the SE system? Do I",
"be patient and slowly amass more points? (Please note, I do realize there",
"out how things work here, so for the sake of argument, could you",
"to perceive. But I'm trying to figure out how things work here, so",
"etiquette](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1753/answering-etiquette?noredirect=1#comment7510_1753) After a helpful answer and some helpful comments to my other question,",
"thinking? Or is this a perfectly ethical artifact of the SE system? Do",
"reach the same conclusion. Neither one of us cites any links. His answer",
"equivalent to mine. His style is more authoritative than mine, but we are",
"a helpful answer and some helpful comments to my other question, I realize"
] |
[
"to support scanning and converting to raw data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558) Pushing these questions over to,",
"as being amongst top referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top) [What is the best way to design a",
"research resources for which Wikipedia is known as being amongst top referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top) [What",
"questions over to, say, StackOverflow is (rightly) going to have the reviewers there",
"do we maybe lose the benefit of the entire community of StackExchange by",
"StackOverflow is (rightly) going to have the reviewers there closing them immediately due",
"best way to design a paper questionnaire to support scanning and converting to",
"data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558) Pushing these questions over to, say, StackOverflow is (rightly) going to have",
"Chat, maybe? Something else? Is there a role for hybrid SE communities? Just",
"is the best way to design a paper questionnaire to support scanning and",
"there closing them immediately due to being off topic, etc., but do we",
"asked on Academia that are academic in scope but might benefit from a",
"StackExchange by not allowing for more cross-pollination? Because a lot of these questions",
"other parts of SE because of their technical nature. Some examples: [Examples of",
"because of their technical nature. Some examples: [Examples of research resources for which",
"going to have the reviewers there closing them immediately due to being off",
"seen a few questions asked on Academia that are academic in scope but",
"converting to raw data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558) Pushing these questions over to, say, StackOverflow is (rightly)",
"top referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top) [What is the best way to design a paper questionnaire to",
"great fit for either community, is there a better place to ask them?",
"Something else? Is there a role for hybrid SE communities? Just a thought...",
"Because a lot of these questions go unanswered as a result of not",
"resources for which Wikipedia is known as being amongst top referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top) [What is",
"amongst top referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top) [What is the best way to design a paper questionnaire",
"ask them? Chat, maybe? Something else? Is there a role for hybrid SE",
"Pushing these questions over to, say, StackOverflow is (rightly) going to have the",
"nature. Some examples: [Examples of research resources for which Wikipedia is known as",
"of SE because of their technical nature. Some examples: [Examples of research resources",
"etc., but do we maybe lose the benefit of the entire community of",
"for more cross-pollination? Because a lot of these questions go unanswered as a",
"(rightly) going to have the reviewers there closing them immediately due to being",
"referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top) [What is the best way to design a paper questionnaire to support",
"entire community of StackExchange by not allowing for more cross-pollination? Because a lot",
"scope but might benefit from a little help from other parts of SE",
"are academic in scope but might benefit from a little help from other",
"to being off topic, etc., but do we maybe lose the benefit of",
"maybe lose the benefit of the entire community of StackExchange by not allowing",
"community, is there a better place to ask them? Chat, maybe? Something else?",
"there a better place to ask them? Chat, maybe? Something else? Is there",
"have the reviewers there closing them immediately due to being off topic, etc.,",
"being amongst top referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top) [What is the best way to design a paper",
"lot of these questions go unanswered as a result of not being a",
"parts of SE because of their technical nature. Some examples: [Examples of research",
"by not allowing for more cross-pollination? Because a lot of these questions go",
"a result of not being a great fit for either community, is there",
"Academia that are academic in scope but might benefit from a little help",
"from other parts of SE because of their technical nature. Some examples: [Examples",
"these questions go unanswered as a result of not being a great fit",
"topic, etc., but do we maybe lose the benefit of the entire community",
"reviewers there closing them immediately due to being off topic, etc., but do",
"Some examples: [Examples of research resources for which Wikipedia is known as being",
"better place to ask them? Chat, maybe? Something else? Is there a role",
"a little help from other parts of SE because of their technical nature.",
"a great fit for either community, is there a better place to ask",
"help from other parts of SE because of their technical nature. Some examples:",
"Wikipedia is known as being amongst top referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top) [What is the best way",
"is there a better place to ask them? Chat, maybe? Something else? Is",
"of these questions go unanswered as a result of not being a great",
"the reviewers there closing them immediately due to being off topic, etc., but",
"might benefit from a little help from other parts of SE because of",
"of research resources for which Wikipedia is known as being amongst top referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top)",
"a paper questionnaire to support scanning and converting to raw data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558) Pushing these",
"place to ask them? Chat, maybe? Something else? Is there a role for",
"way to design a paper questionnaire to support scanning and converting to raw",
"the benefit of the entire community of StackExchange by not allowing for more",
"we maybe lose the benefit of the entire community of StackExchange by not",
"for either community, is there a better place to ask them? Chat, maybe?",
"to, say, StackOverflow is (rightly) going to have the reviewers there closing them",
"on Academia that are academic in scope but might benefit from a little",
"for which Wikipedia is known as being amongst top referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top) [What is the",
"SE because of their technical nature. Some examples: [Examples of research resources for",
"is (rightly) going to have the reviewers there closing them immediately due to",
"scanning and converting to raw data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558) Pushing these questions over to, say, StackOverflow",
"known as being amongst top referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top) [What is the best way to design",
"off topic, etc., but do we maybe lose the benefit of the entire",
"not being a great fit for either community, is there a better place",
"but do we maybe lose the benefit of the entire community of StackExchange",
"[What is the best way to design a paper questionnaire to support scanning",
"and converting to raw data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558) Pushing these questions over to, say, StackOverflow is",
"a better place to ask them? Chat, maybe? Something else? Is there a",
"more cross-pollination? Because a lot of these questions go unanswered as a result",
"Lately I've seen a few questions asked on Academia that are academic in",
"academic in scope but might benefit from a little help from other parts",
"of the entire community of StackExchange by not allowing for more cross-pollination? Because",
"[Examples of research resources for which Wikipedia is known as being amongst top",
"them? Chat, maybe? Something else? Is there a role for hybrid SE communities?",
"them immediately due to being off topic, etc., but do we maybe lose",
"benefit of the entire community of StackExchange by not allowing for more cross-pollination?",
"lose the benefit of the entire community of StackExchange by not allowing for",
"being off topic, etc., but do we maybe lose the benefit of the",
"result of not being a great fit for either community, is there a",
"technical nature. Some examples: [Examples of research resources for which Wikipedia is known",
"not allowing for more cross-pollination? Because a lot of these questions go unanswered",
"to raw data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558) Pushing these questions over to, say, StackOverflow is (rightly) going",
"the best way to design a paper questionnaire to support scanning and converting",
"design a paper questionnaire to support scanning and converting to raw data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558) Pushing",
"immediately due to being off topic, etc., but do we maybe lose the",
"a lot of these questions go unanswered as a result of not being",
"of their technical nature. Some examples: [Examples of research resources for which Wikipedia",
"allowing for more cross-pollination? Because a lot of these questions go unanswered as",
"to ask them? Chat, maybe? Something else? Is there a role for hybrid",
"either community, is there a better place to ask them? Chat, maybe? Something",
"a few questions asked on Academia that are academic in scope but might",
"to have the reviewers there closing them immediately due to being off topic,",
"little help from other parts of SE because of their technical nature. Some",
"paper questionnaire to support scanning and converting to raw data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558) Pushing these questions",
"examples: [Examples of research resources for which Wikipedia is known as being amongst",
"questionnaire to support scanning and converting to raw data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558) Pushing these questions over",
"questions asked on Academia that are academic in scope but might benefit from",
"the entire community of StackExchange by not allowing for more cross-pollination? Because a",
"from a little help from other parts of SE because of their technical",
"say, StackOverflow is (rightly) going to have the reviewers there closing them immediately",
"but might benefit from a little help from other parts of SE because",
"as a result of not being a great fit for either community, is",
"of StackExchange by not allowing for more cross-pollination? Because a lot of these",
"of not being a great fit for either community, is there a better",
"I've seen a few questions asked on Academia that are academic in scope",
"to design a paper questionnaire to support scanning and converting to raw data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558)",
"unanswered as a result of not being a great fit for either community,",
"go unanswered as a result of not being a great fit for either",
"being a great fit for either community, is there a better place to",
"that are academic in scope but might benefit from a little help from",
"over to, say, StackOverflow is (rightly) going to have the reviewers there closing",
"raw data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558) Pushing these questions over to, say, StackOverflow is (rightly) going to",
"benefit from a little help from other parts of SE because of their",
"due to being off topic, etc., but do we maybe lose the benefit",
"their technical nature. Some examples: [Examples of research resources for which Wikipedia is",
"maybe? Something else? Is there a role for hybrid SE communities? Just a",
"closing them immediately due to being off topic, etc., but do we maybe",
"fit for either community, is there a better place to ask them? Chat,",
"which Wikipedia is known as being amongst top referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top) [What is the best",
"few questions asked on Academia that are academic in scope but might benefit",
"cross-pollination? Because a lot of these questions go unanswered as a result of",
"these questions over to, say, StackOverflow is (rightly) going to have the reviewers",
"in scope but might benefit from a little help from other parts of",
"community of StackExchange by not allowing for more cross-pollination? Because a lot of",
"questions go unanswered as a result of not being a great fit for",
"support scanning and converting to raw data?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/43353/what-is-the-best-way-to-design-a-paper-questionnaire-to-support-scanning-and-con/44558#44558) Pushing these questions over to, say,",
"is known as being amongst top referrers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41831/examples-of-research-resources-for-which-wikipedia-is-known-as-being-amongst-top) [What is the best way to"
] |
[
"about job outside academia but related to on topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic) and [Are questions regarding",
"is inconsistent and, I must say, confusing (to me, anyway). Why were these",
"job outside academia but related to on topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic) and [Are questions regarding academic",
"and [Are questions regarding academic internships off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)), I'd like to get some feedback",
"confusing (to me, anyway). Why were these two questions handled so differently by",
"but that is another matter). However, the outcomes of the two questions above",
"[Does name of university matter for internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships), was not closed. These two questions",
"matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter), was closed as off-topic. The second question, [Does name of university matter",
"on topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic) and [Are questions regarding academic internships off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)), I'd like to get",
"university matter for internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships), was not closed. These two questions seem to be",
"the two questions above is inconsistent and, I must say, confusing (to me,",
"jobs/internships which were handled very differently. The first question, [Does your university name",
"as off-topic. The second question, [Does name of university matter for internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships), was",
"questions regarding academic internships off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)), I'd like to get some feedback on two",
"not closed. These two questions seem to be quite similar to my mind",
"very differently. The first question, [Does your university name matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter), was closed as",
"(perhaps, one is a duplicate of the other, but that is another matter).",
"of the two questions above is inconsistent and, I must say, confusing (to",
"regarding academic internships off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)), I'd like to get some feedback on two very",
"The first question, [Does your university name matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter), was closed as off-topic. The",
"say, confusing (to me, anyway). Why were these two questions handled so differently",
"related to non-academic jobs/internships which were handled very differently. The first question, [Does",
"the outcomes of the two questions above is inconsistent and, I must say,",
"of the other, but that is another matter). However, the outcomes of the",
"above is inconsistent and, I must say, confusing (to me, anyway). Why were",
"questions seem to be quite similar to my mind (perhaps, one is a",
"feedback on two very similar questions related to non-academic jobs/internships which were handled",
"were handled very differently. The first question, [Does your university name matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter), was",
"outside academia but related to on topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic) and [Are questions regarding academic internships",
"closed as off-topic. The second question, [Does name of university matter for internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships),",
"by recent meta questions ([Are question about job outside academia but related to",
"me, anyway). Why were these two questions handled so differently by the \"powers",
"handled very differently. The first question, [Does your university name matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter), was closed",
"(to me, anyway). Why were these two questions handled so differently by the",
"([Are question about job outside academia but related to on topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic) and [Are",
"question about job outside academia but related to on topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic) and [Are questions",
"on two very similar questions related to non-academic jobs/internships which were handled very",
"outcomes of the two questions above is inconsistent and, I must say, confusing",
"non-academic jobs/internships which were handled very differently. The first question, [Does your university",
"but related to on topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic) and [Are questions regarding academic internships off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)), I'd",
"was closed as off-topic. The second question, [Does name of university matter for",
"anyway). Why were these two questions handled so differently by the \"powers that",
"academic internships off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)), I'd like to get some feedback on two very similar",
"was not closed. These two questions seem to be quite similar to my",
"Why were these two questions handled so differently by the \"powers that be?\"",
"inconsistent and, I must say, confusing (to me, anyway). Why were these two",
"is a duplicate of the other, but that is another matter). However, the",
"to non-academic jobs/internships which were handled very differently. The first question, [Does your",
"question, [Does name of university matter for internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships), was not closed. These two",
"duplicate of the other, but that is another matter). However, the outcomes of",
"I must say, confusing (to me, anyway). Why were these two questions handled",
"two questions above is inconsistent and, I must say, confusing (to me, anyway).",
"get some feedback on two very similar questions related to non-academic jobs/internships which",
"two very similar questions related to non-academic jobs/internships which were handled very differently.",
"is another matter). However, the outcomes of the two questions above is inconsistent",
"very similar questions related to non-academic jobs/internships which were handled very differently. The",
"some feedback on two very similar questions related to non-academic jobs/internships which were",
"to my mind (perhaps, one is a duplicate of the other, but that",
"matter for internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships), was not closed. These two questions seem to be quite",
"related to on topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic) and [Are questions regarding academic internships off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)), I'd like",
"questions above is inconsistent and, I must say, confusing (to me, anyway). Why",
"questions related to non-academic jobs/internships which were handled very differently. The first question,",
"to on topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic) and [Are questions regarding academic internships off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)), I'd like to",
"topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic) and [Are questions regarding academic internships off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)), I'd like to get some",
"internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships), was not closed. These two questions seem to be quite similar to",
"off-topic. The second question, [Does name of university matter for internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships), was not",
"mind (perhaps, one is a duplicate of the other, but that is another",
"my mind (perhaps, one is a duplicate of the other, but that is",
"your university name matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter), was closed as off-topic. The second question, [Does name",
"quite similar to my mind (perhaps, one is a duplicate of the other,",
"closed. These two questions seem to be quite similar to my mind (perhaps,",
"and, I must say, confusing (to me, anyway). Why were these two questions",
"of university matter for internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships), was not closed. These two questions seem to",
"The second question, [Does name of university matter for internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships), was not closed.",
"questions ([Are question about job outside academia but related to on topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic) and",
"internships off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)), I'd like to get some feedback on two very similar questions",
"off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)), I'd like to get some feedback on two very similar questions related",
"university name matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter), was closed as off-topic. The second question, [Does name of",
"name of university matter for internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships), was not closed. These two questions seem",
"similar to my mind (perhaps, one is a duplicate of the other, but",
"meta questions ([Are question about job outside academia but related to on topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic)",
"[Are questions regarding academic internships off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)), I'd like to get some feedback on",
"which were handled very differently. The first question, [Does your university name matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter),",
"that is another matter). However, the outcomes of the two questions above is",
"I'd like to get some feedback on two very similar questions related to",
"[Does your university name matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter), was closed as off-topic. The second question, [Does",
"These two questions seem to be quite similar to my mind (perhaps, one",
"differently. The first question, [Does your university name matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter), was closed as off-topic.",
"another matter). However, the outcomes of the two questions above is inconsistent and,",
"recent meta questions ([Are question about job outside academia but related to on",
"for internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships), was not closed. These two questions seem to be quite similar",
"to get some feedback on two very similar questions related to non-academic jobs/internships",
"question, [Does your university name matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter), was closed as off-topic. The second question,",
"second question, [Does name of university matter for internships?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44685/does-name-of-university-matter-for-internships), was not closed. These",
"the other, but that is another matter). However, the outcomes of the two",
"other, but that is another matter). However, the outcomes of the two questions",
"academia but related to on topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1713/are-question-about-job-outside-academia-but-related-to-on-topic) and [Are questions regarding academic internships off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1742/are-questions-regarding-academic-internships-off-topic)),",
"Inspired by recent meta questions ([Are question about job outside academia but related",
"matter). However, the outcomes of the two questions above is inconsistent and, I",
"first question, [Does your university name matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter), was closed as off-topic. The second",
"to be quite similar to my mind (perhaps, one is a duplicate of",
"one is a duplicate of the other, but that is another matter). However,",
"seem to be quite similar to my mind (perhaps, one is a duplicate",
"a duplicate of the other, but that is another matter). However, the outcomes",
"similar questions related to non-academic jobs/internships which were handled very differently. The first",
"However, the outcomes of the two questions above is inconsistent and, I must",
"like to get some feedback on two very similar questions related to non-academic",
"two questions seem to be quite similar to my mind (perhaps, one is",
"must say, confusing (to me, anyway). Why were these two questions handled so",
"name matter?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34899/does-your-university-name-matter), was closed as off-topic. The second question, [Does name of university",
"be quite similar to my mind (perhaps, one is a duplicate of the"
] |
[
"ago, was closed due to being too broad. However, recently the question was",
"is clear that the question is still not well-received. Would someone (maybe the",
"concerning the value about traditional lecture, which was posted by me a long",
"closed due to being too broad. However, recently the question was reopened and,",
"who reopened the question) care to explain the rationale behind reopening this old",
"traditional lecture, which was posted by me a long time ago, was closed",
"reopened and, judging from the downvotes, it is clear that the question is",
"not well-received. Would someone (maybe the person who reopened the question) care to",
"me a long time ago, was closed due to being too broad. However,",
"was reopened and, judging from the downvotes, it is clear that the question",
"someone (maybe the person who reopened the question) care to explain the rationale",
"to being too broad. However, recently the question was reopened and, judging from",
"the downvotes, it is clear that the question is still not well-received. Would",
"well-received. Would someone (maybe the person who reopened the question) care to explain",
"value about traditional lecture, which was posted by me a long time ago,",
"the question is still not well-received. Would someone (maybe the person who reopened",
"However, recently the question was reopened and, judging from the downvotes, it is",
"the person who reopened the question) care to explain the rationale behind reopening",
"is still not well-received. Would someone (maybe the person who reopened the question)",
"due to being too broad. However, recently the question was reopened and, judging",
"broad. However, recently the question was reopened and, judging from the downvotes, it",
"Would someone (maybe the person who reopened the question) care to explain the",
"recently the question was reopened and, judging from the downvotes, it is clear",
"which was posted by me a long time ago, was closed due to",
"long time ago, was closed due to being too broad. However, recently the",
"question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29805/what-is-the-point-of-traditional-lectures) concerning the value about traditional lecture, which was posted by me a",
"by me a long time ago, was closed due to being too broad.",
"judging from the downvotes, it is clear that the question is still not",
"the value about traditional lecture, which was posted by me a long time",
"a long time ago, was closed due to being too broad. However, recently",
"[This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29805/what-is-the-point-of-traditional-lectures) concerning the value about traditional lecture, which was posted by me",
"was posted by me a long time ago, was closed due to being",
"time ago, was closed due to being too broad. However, recently the question",
"and, judging from the downvotes, it is clear that the question is still",
"(maybe the person who reopened the question) care to explain the rationale behind",
"reopened the question) care to explain the rationale behind reopening this old question?",
"question is still not well-received. Would someone (maybe the person who reopened the",
"question was reopened and, judging from the downvotes, it is clear that the",
"downvotes, it is clear that the question is still not well-received. Would someone",
"it is clear that the question is still not well-received. Would someone (maybe",
"clear that the question is still not well-received. Would someone (maybe the person",
"posted by me a long time ago, was closed due to being too",
"the question was reopened and, judging from the downvotes, it is clear that",
"being too broad. However, recently the question was reopened and, judging from the",
"lecture, which was posted by me a long time ago, was closed due",
"that the question is still not well-received. Would someone (maybe the person who",
"about traditional lecture, which was posted by me a long time ago, was",
"from the downvotes, it is clear that the question is still not well-received.",
"still not well-received. Would someone (maybe the person who reopened the question) care",
"too broad. However, recently the question was reopened and, judging from the downvotes,",
"was closed due to being too broad. However, recently the question was reopened",
"person who reopened the question) care to explain the rationale behind reopening this"
] |
[
"asking what would be a good journal to which to submit a paper",
"to them when they inform you of their decision. When the suspension ended",
"I did flag a posting from the person who stalked and harassed me,",
"are this community's standards concerning the following behavior? * I posted a question",
"far to long. * Next time I posted a question on a different",
"I posted a question asking what would be a good journal to which",
"good journal to which to submit a paper arguing in favor or a",
"opinion that had been mentioned but not defended in my earlier question posted",
"not identify, had complained that I was \"stalking and harassing\" him, using *my*",
"a paper arguing in favor or a certain proposition. I didn't try to",
"able to reply to them when they inform you of their decision. When",
"his behavior to the moderators at that time. Then I got a message",
"does so first wins. It's all about timing. The moderators are anonymous and",
"possible to contact them except by flagging a posting (and you can't flag",
"been written. As far as I could tell, he made these comments only",
"a different topic. I told him I would not \"stalk and harass\" him",
"not possible to contact them except by flagging a posting (and you can't",
"Are the behaviors described in the bullet points above considered appropriate by the",
"he made these comments only because he objected to something about an earlier",
"bullet points above considered appropriate by the participants in academia.stackexchange.com or by its",
"wins. It's all about timing. The moderators are anonymous and it is not",
"like that. I did not report his behavior to the moderators at that",
"time. Then I got a message from the moderators saying someone, whom they",
"did not report his behavior to the moderators at that time. Then I",
"they cut you off from being able to reply to them when they",
"does so first, and whoever does so first wins. It's all about timing.",
"it was. The moderators suspended me for seven days. One lesson is the",
"to something about an earlier question on a different topic. I told him",
"points above considered appropriate by the participants in academia.stackexchange.com or by its moderators?",
"verbatim. Naturally this gave rise to a suspicion about who it was. The",
"because he objected to something about an earlier question on a different topic.",
"*know* the nature of the complaint about me, and I am left to",
"So it seems it is about who goes to the moderators *first*. Are",
"am left to *guess*. I was explicitly told that the nature of the",
"to the moderators at that time. Then I got a message from the",
"what would be a good journal to which to submit a paper arguing",
"was not about that particular posting but about the behavior of the poster.",
"different topic, a person who disagreed with the opinion that had been mentioned",
"not read, since it has not yet been written. As far as I",
"This about a paper he has not read, since it has not yet",
"read, since it has not yet been written. As far as I could",
"my concern was not about that particular posting but about the behavior of",
"question on a different topic. I told him I would not \"stalk and",
"community's standards concerning the following behavior? * I posted a question asking what",
"more inclined to report things to the moderators does so first, and whoever",
"to a suspicion about who it was. The moderators suspended me for seven",
"on a different topic. I told him I would not \"stalk and harass\"",
"reply to them when they inform you of their decision. When the suspension",
"they inform you of their decision. When the suspension ended I did flag",
"me, and I am left to *guess*. I was explicitly told that the",
"who goes to the moderators *first*. Are the behaviors described in the bullet",
"and harass\" him like that. I did not report his behavior to the",
"seven days. One lesson is the person more inclined to report things to",
"behavior of the poster. After two days I've heard nothing. So it seems",
"about an earlier question on a different topic. I told him I would",
"in an answer below that I omitted many relevant details. But I still",
"comments only because he objected to something about an earlier question on a",
"posting but about the behavior of the poster. After two days I've heard",
"try to argue for that proposition in the question; that would be off",
"it seems it is about who goes to the moderators *first*. Are the",
"the behaviors described in the bullet points above considered appropriate by the participants",
"disagreed with the opinion that had been mentioned but not defended in my",
"complaint about me, and I am left to *guess*. I was explicitly told",
"this community's standards concerning the following behavior? * I posted a question asking",
"One lesson is the person more inclined to report things to the moderators",
"the behavior of the poster. After two days I've heard nothing. So it",
"him like that. I did not report his behavior to the moderators at",
"suspension ended I did flag a posting from the person who stalked and",
"in favor or a certain proposition. I didn't try to argue for that",
"certain proposition. I didn't try to argue for that proposition in the question;",
"*first*. Are the behaviors described in the bullet points above considered appropriate by",
"I am told in an answer below that I omitted many relevant details.",
"poster. After two days I've heard nothing. So it seems it is about",
"harass\" him like that. I did not report his behavior to the moderators",
"anonymous and it is not possible to contact them except by flagging a",
"several comments in which he called the proposed, and in fact not yet",
"posting (and you can't flag comments) and they cut you off from being",
"the moderators does so first, and whoever does so first wins. It's all",
"and I am left to *guess*. I was explicitly told that the nature",
"not yet been written. As far as I could tell, he made these",
"you can't flag comments) and they cut you off from being able to",
"behaviors described in the bullet points above considered appropriate by the participants in",
"seems it is about who goes to the moderators *first*. Are the behaviors",
"me for seven days. One lesson is the person more inclined to report",
"of the complaint and the identity of the complainant would be kept from",
"being able to reply to them when they inform you of their decision.",
"But I still don't *know* the nature of the complaint about me, and",
"been mentioned but not defended in my earlier question posted several comments in",
"rise to a suspicion about who it was. The moderators suspended me for",
"moderators does so first, and whoever does so first wins. It's all about",
"are anonymous and it is not possible to contact them except by flagging",
"by flagging a posting (and you can't flag comments) and they cut you",
"The moderators suspended me for seven days. One lesson is the person more",
"nothing. So it seems it is about who goes to the moderators *first*.",
"that would be off topic and would take far to long. * Next",
"explaining that my concern was not about that particular posting but about the",
"would be off topic and would take far to long. * Next time",
"for seven days. One lesson is the person more inclined to report things",
"goes to the moderators *first*. Are the behaviors described in the bullet points",
"not report his behavior to the moderators at that time. Then I got",
"has not read, since it has not yet been written. As far as",
"and harassed me, explaining that my concern was not about that particular posting",
"except by flagging a posting (and you can't flag comments) and they cut",
"I didn't try to argue for that proposition in the question; that would",
"contact them except by flagging a posting (and you can't flag comments) and",
"heard nothing. So it seems it is about who goes to the moderators",
"*guess*. I was explicitly told that the nature of the complaint and the",
"made these comments only because he objected to something about an earlier question",
"can't flag comments) and they cut you off from being able to reply",
"\"stalking and harassing\" him, using *my* words, not quite verbatim. Naturally this gave",
"had complained that I was \"stalking and harassing\" him, using *my* words, not",
"considered appropriate by the participants in academia.stackexchange.com or by its moderators? **PS:** I",
"the following behavior? * I posted a question asking what would be a",
"or by its moderators? **PS:** I am told in an answer below that",
"many relevant details. But I still don't *know* the nature of the complaint",
"I told him I would not \"stalk and harass\" him like that. I",
"the person who stalked and harassed me, explaining that my concern was not",
"my earlier question posted several comments in which he called the proposed, and",
"inclined to report things to the moderators does so first, and whoever does",
"question asking what would be a good journal to which to submit a",
"would take far to long. * Next time I posted a question on",
"moderators suspended me for seven days. One lesson is the person more inclined",
"you of their decision. When the suspension ended I did flag a posting",
"comments) and they cut you off from being able to reply to them",
"a good journal to which to submit a paper arguing in favor or",
"omitted many relevant details. But I still don't *know* the nature of the",
"nature of the complaint about me, and I am left to *guess*. I",
"told in an answer below that I omitted many relevant details. But I",
"a posting from the person who stalked and harassed me, explaining that my",
"of the complaint about me, and I am left to *guess*. I was",
"an answer below that I omitted many relevant details. But I still don't",
"still don't *know* the nature of the complaint about me, and I am",
"tell, he made these comments only because he objected to something about an",
"After two days I've heard nothing. So it seems it is about who",
"time I posted a question on a different topic, a person who disagreed",
"posted a question on a different topic, a person who disagreed with the",
"written. As far as I could tell, he made these comments only because",
"of their decision. When the suspension ended I did flag a posting from",
"it has not yet been written. As far as I could tell, he",
"for that proposition in the question; that would be off topic and would",
"\"rant\", and \"ranting\". This about a paper he has not read, since it",
"cut you off from being able to reply to them when they inform",
"and they cut you off from being able to reply to them when",
"moderators saying someone, whom they did not identify, had complained that I was",
"could tell, he made these comments only because he objected to something about",
"about timing. The moderators are anonymous and it is not possible to contact",
"to submit a paper arguing in favor or a certain proposition. I didn't",
"I would not \"stalk and harass\" him like that. I did not report",
"the complaint about me, and I am left to *guess*. I was explicitly",
"so first, and whoever does so first wins. It's all about timing. The",
"* I posted a question asking what would be a good journal to",
"earlier question on a different topic. I told him I would not \"stalk",
"submit a paper arguing in favor or a certain proposition. I didn't try",
"above considered appropriate by the participants in academia.stackexchange.com or by its moderators? **PS:**",
"complained that I was \"stalking and harassing\" him, using *my* words, not quite",
"explicitly told that the nature of the complaint and the identity of the",
"lesson is the person more inclined to report things to the moderators does",
"journal to which to submit a paper arguing in favor or a certain",
"message from the moderators saying someone, whom they did not identify, had complained",
"and \"ranting\". This about a paper he has not read, since it has",
"mentioned but not defended in my earlier question posted several comments in which",
"them when they inform you of their decision. When the suspension ended I",
"in my earlier question posted several comments in which he called the proposed,",
"you off from being able to reply to them when they inform you",
"arguing in favor or a certain proposition. I didn't try to argue for",
"I was \"stalking and harassing\" him, using *my* words, not quite verbatim. Naturally",
"**PS:** I am told in an answer below that I omitted many relevant",
"the proposed, and in fact not yet written, paper a \"rant\", and \"ranting\".",
"didn't try to argue for that proposition in the question; that would be",
"in the bullet points above considered appropriate by the participants in academia.stackexchange.com or",
"did flag a posting from the person who stalked and harassed me, explaining",
"flag comments) and they cut you off from being able to reply to",
"question posted several comments in which he called the proposed, and in fact",
"about who it was. The moderators suspended me for seven days. One lesson",
"I omitted many relevant details. But I still don't *know* the nature of",
"in the question; that would be off topic and would take far to",
"Next time I posted a question on a different topic, a person who",
"was explicitly told that the nature of the complaint and the identity of",
"at that time. Then I got a message from the moderators saying someone,",
"by its moderators? **PS:** I am told in an answer below that I",
"relevant details. But I still don't *know* the nature of the complaint about",
"stalked and harassed me, explaining that my concern was not about that particular",
"who stalked and harassed me, explaining that my concern was not about that",
"when they inform you of their decision. When the suspension ended I did",
"report his behavior to the moderators at that time. Then I got a",
"topic. I told him I would not \"stalk and harass\" him like that.",
"I was explicitly told that the nature of the complaint and the identity",
"harassed me, explaining that my concern was not about that particular posting but",
"and whoever does so first wins. It's all about timing. The moderators are",
"be off topic and would take far to long. * Next time I",
"to reply to them when they inform you of their decision. When the",
"far as I could tell, he made these comments only because he objected",
"but about the behavior of the poster. After two days I've heard nothing.",
"that proposition in the question; that would be off topic and would take",
"he called the proposed, and in fact not yet written, paper a \"rant\",",
"particular posting but about the behavior of the poster. After two days I've",
"in academia.stackexchange.com or by its moderators? **PS:** I am told in an answer",
"topic and would take far to long. * Next time I posted a",
"not \"stalk and harass\" him like that. I did not report his behavior",
"*my* words, not quite verbatim. Naturally this gave rise to a suspicion about",
"me, explaining that my concern was not about that particular posting but about",
"who it was. The moderators suspended me for seven days. One lesson is",
"the poster. After two days I've heard nothing. So it seems it is",
"It's all about timing. The moderators are anonymous and it is not possible",
"a question on a different topic, a person who disagreed with the opinion",
"an earlier question on a different topic. I told him I would not",
"long. * Next time I posted a question on a different topic, a",
"things to the moderators does so first, and whoever does so first wins.",
"to argue for that proposition in the question; that would be off topic",
"the question; that would be off topic and would take far to long.",
"was \"stalking and harassing\" him, using *my* words, not quite verbatim. Naturally this",
"that I omitted many relevant details. But I still don't *know* the nature",
"posted several comments in which he called the proposed, and in fact not",
"timing. The moderators are anonymous and it is not possible to contact them",
"in fact not yet written, paper a \"rant\", and \"ranting\". This about a",
"I did not report his behavior to the moderators at that time. Then",
"these comments only because he objected to something about an earlier question on",
"saying someone, whom they did not identify, had complained that I was \"stalking",
"I got a message from the moderators saying someone, whom they did not",
"this gave rise to a suspicion about who it was. The moderators suspended",
"quite verbatim. Naturally this gave rise to a suspicion about who it was.",
"take far to long. * Next time I posted a question on a",
"suspicion about who it was. The moderators suspended me for seven days. One",
"person who disagreed with the opinion that had been mentioned but not defended",
"concern was not about that particular posting but about the behavior of the",
"that. I did not report his behavior to the moderators at that time.",
"proposed, and in fact not yet written, paper a \"rant\", and \"ranting\". This",
"the moderators saying someone, whom they did not identify, had complained that I",
"the complaint and the identity of the complainant would be kept from me.",
"comments in which he called the proposed, and in fact not yet written,",
"topic, a person who disagreed with the opinion that had been mentioned but",
"different topic. I told him I would not \"stalk and harass\" him like",
"of the poster. After two days I've heard nothing. So it seems it",
"question on a different topic, a person who disagreed with the opinion that",
"What are this community's standards concerning the following behavior? * I posted a",
"favor or a certain proposition. I didn't try to argue for that proposition",
"the bullet points above considered appropriate by the participants in academia.stackexchange.com or by",
"the nature of the complaint and the identity of the complainant would be",
"first, and whoever does so first wins. It's all about timing. The moderators",
"moderators *first*. Are the behaviors described in the bullet points above considered appropriate",
"yet been written. As far as I could tell, he made these comments",
"gave rise to a suspicion about who it was. The moderators suspended me",
"argue for that proposition in the question; that would be off topic and",
"earlier question posted several comments in which he called the proposed, and in",
"it is about who goes to the moderators *first*. Are the behaviors described",
"the opinion that had been mentioned but not defended in my earlier question",
"by the participants in academia.stackexchange.com or by its moderators? **PS:** I am told",
"two days I've heard nothing. So it seems it is about who goes",
"yet written, paper a \"rant\", and \"ranting\". This about a paper he has",
"concerning the following behavior? * I posted a question asking what would be",
"(and you can't flag comments) and they cut you off from being able",
"from the moderators saying someone, whom they did not identify, had complained that",
"its moderators? **PS:** I am told in an answer below that I omitted",
"that had been mentioned but not defended in my earlier question posted several",
"inform you of their decision. When the suspension ended I did flag a",
"don't *know* the nature of the complaint about me, and I am left",
"question; that would be off topic and would take far to long. *",
"that my concern was not about that particular posting but about the behavior",
"to which to submit a paper arguing in favor or a certain proposition.",
"days I've heard nothing. So it seems it is about who goes to",
"them except by flagging a posting (and you can't flag comments) and they",
"or a certain proposition. I didn't try to argue for that proposition in",
"a \"rant\", and \"ranting\". This about a paper he has not read, since",
"someone, whom they did not identify, had complained that I was \"stalking and",
"flag a posting from the person who stalked and harassed me, explaining that",
"did not identify, had complained that I was \"stalking and harassing\" him, using",
"not quite verbatim. Naturally this gave rise to a suspicion about who it",
"that particular posting but about the behavior of the poster. After two days",
"since it has not yet been written. As far as I could tell,",
"academia.stackexchange.com or by its moderators? **PS:** I am told in an answer below",
"to long. * Next time I posted a question on a different topic,",
"participants in academia.stackexchange.com or by its moderators? **PS:** I am told in an",
"the moderators *first*. Are the behaviors described in the bullet points above considered",
"but not defended in my earlier question posted several comments in which he",
"was. The moderators suspended me for seven days. One lesson is the person",
"and harassing\" him, using *my* words, not quite verbatim. Naturally this gave rise",
"had been mentioned but not defended in my earlier question posted several comments",
"identify, had complained that I was \"stalking and harassing\" him, using *my* words,",
"I still don't *know* the nature of the complaint about me, and I",
"called the proposed, and in fact not yet written, paper a \"rant\", and",
"and in fact not yet written, paper a \"rant\", and \"ranting\". This about",
"told him I would not \"stalk and harass\" him like that. I did",
"a different topic, a person who disagreed with the opinion that had been",
"a person who disagreed with the opinion that had been mentioned but not",
"the suspension ended I did flag a posting from the person who stalked",
"has not yet been written. As far as I could tell, he made",
"something about an earlier question on a different topic. I told him I",
"the person more inclined to report things to the moderators does so first,",
"him, using *my* words, not quite verbatim. Naturally this gave rise to a",
"a paper he has not read, since it has not yet been written.",
"appropriate by the participants in academia.stackexchange.com or by its moderators? **PS:** I am",
"about that particular posting but about the behavior of the poster. After two",
"a certain proposition. I didn't try to argue for that proposition in the",
"described in the bullet points above considered appropriate by the participants in academia.stackexchange.com",
"proposition in the question; that would be off topic and would take far",
"that the nature of the complaint and the identity of the complainant would",
"the moderators at that time. Then I got a message from the moderators",
"with the opinion that had been mentioned but not defended in my earlier",
"got a message from the moderators saying someone, whom they did not identify,",
"in which he called the proposed, and in fact not yet written, paper",
"behavior? * I posted a question asking what would be a good journal",
"paper a \"rant\", and \"ranting\". This about a paper he has not read,",
"not about that particular posting but about the behavior of the poster. After",
"ended I did flag a posting from the person who stalked and harassed",
"so first wins. It's all about timing. The moderators are anonymous and it",
"which to submit a paper arguing in favor or a certain proposition. I",
"behavior to the moderators at that time. Then I got a message from",
"all about timing. The moderators are anonymous and it is not possible to",
"and would take far to long. * Next time I posted a question",
"is about who goes to the moderators *first*. Are the behaviors described in",
"* Next time I posted a question on a different topic, a person",
"off from being able to reply to them when they inform you of",
"and it is not possible to contact them except by flagging a posting",
"which he called the proposed, and in fact not yet written, paper a",
"person more inclined to report things to the moderators does so first, and",
"it is not possible to contact them except by flagging a posting (and",
"told that the nature of the complaint and the identity of the complainant",
"moderators at that time. Then I got a message from the moderators saying",
"not defended in my earlier question posted several comments in which he called",
"he has not read, since it has not yet been written. As far",
"that I was \"stalking and harassing\" him, using *my* words, not quite verbatim.",
"he objected to something about an earlier question on a different topic. I",
"first wins. It's all about timing. The moderators are anonymous and it is",
"is not possible to contact them except by flagging a posting (and you",
"the nature of the complaint about me, and I am left to *guess*.",
"about me, and I am left to *guess*. I was explicitly told that",
"standards concerning the following behavior? * I posted a question asking what would",
"moderators are anonymous and it is not possible to contact them except by",
"I've heard nothing. So it seems it is about who goes to the",
"a message from the moderators saying someone, whom they did not identify, had",
"as I could tell, he made these comments only because he objected to",
"about the behavior of the poster. After two days I've heard nothing. So",
"posted a question asking what would be a good journal to which to",
"would be a good journal to which to submit a paper arguing in",
"posting from the person who stalked and harassed me, explaining that my concern",
"from being able to reply to them when they inform you of their",
"person who stalked and harassed me, explaining that my concern was not about",
"I am left to *guess*. I was explicitly told that the nature of",
"to report things to the moderators does so first, and whoever does so",
"details. But I still don't *know* the nature of the complaint about me,",
"to the moderators *first*. Are the behaviors described in the bullet points above",
"their decision. When the suspension ended I did flag a posting from the",
"to contact them except by flagging a posting (and you can't flag comments)",
"The moderators are anonymous and it is not possible to contact them except",
"am told in an answer below that I omitted many relevant details. But",
"be a good journal to which to submit a paper arguing in favor",
"written, paper a \"rant\", and \"ranting\". This about a paper he has not",
"I could tell, he made these comments only because he objected to something",
"using *my* words, not quite verbatim. Naturally this gave rise to a suspicion",
"who disagreed with the opinion that had been mentioned but not defended in",
"I posted a question on a different topic, a person who disagreed with",
"decision. When the suspension ended I did flag a posting from the person",
"a suspicion about who it was. The moderators suspended me for seven days.",
"a posting (and you can't flag comments) and they cut you off from",
"objected to something about an earlier question on a different topic. I told",
"suspended me for seven days. One lesson is the person more inclined to",
"words, not quite verbatim. Naturally this gave rise to a suspicion about who",
"\"ranting\". This about a paper he has not read, since it has not",
"to *guess*. I was explicitly told that the nature of the complaint and",
"that time. Then I got a message from the moderators saying someone, whom",
"paper arguing in favor or a certain proposition. I didn't try to argue",
"report things to the moderators does so first, and whoever does so first",
"moderators? **PS:** I am told in an answer below that I omitted many",
"whoever does so first wins. It's all about timing. The moderators are anonymous",
"only because he objected to something about an earlier question on a different",
"Naturally this gave rise to a suspicion about who it was. The moderators",
"a question asking what would be a good journal to which to submit",
"fact not yet written, paper a \"rant\", and \"ranting\". This about a paper",
"As far as I could tell, he made these comments only because he",
"proposition. I didn't try to argue for that proposition in the question; that",
"When the suspension ended I did flag a posting from the person who",
"nature of the complaint and the identity of the complainant would be kept",
"on a different topic, a person who disagreed with the opinion that had",
"not yet written, paper a \"rant\", and \"ranting\". This about a paper he",
"off topic and would take far to long. * Next time I posted",
"paper he has not read, since it has not yet been written. As",
"whom they did not identify, had complained that I was \"stalking and harassing\"",
"below that I omitted many relevant details. But I still don't *know* the",
"following behavior? * I posted a question asking what would be a good",
"the participants in academia.stackexchange.com or by its moderators? **PS:** I am told in",
"about who goes to the moderators *first*. Are the behaviors described in the",
"days. One lesson is the person more inclined to report things to the",
"flagging a posting (and you can't flag comments) and they cut you off",
"they did not identify, had complained that I was \"stalking and harassing\" him,",
"from the person who stalked and harassed me, explaining that my concern was",
"is the person more inclined to report things to the moderators does so",
"to the moderators does so first, and whoever does so first wins. It's",
"would not \"stalk and harass\" him like that. I did not report his",
"defended in my earlier question posted several comments in which he called the",
"\"stalk and harass\" him like that. I did not report his behavior to",
"harassing\" him, using *my* words, not quite verbatim. Naturally this gave rise to",
"Then I got a message from the moderators saying someone, whom they did",
"left to *guess*. I was explicitly told that the nature of the complaint",
"about a paper he has not read, since it has not yet been",
"him I would not \"stalk and harass\" him like that. I did not",
"answer below that I omitted many relevant details. But I still don't *know*"
] |
[
"hopeful major/specialty - at a college. He said that the key to doing",
"that it seems a little opinion-based. I've read through many questions on Academia,",
"college curricula while considering how those curricula would be relevant to graduate school.",
"classes in graduate school as possible (and as few physics classes as possible).",
"opinion-based. I've read through many questions on Academia, and it seems like there",
"it inadvertently backwards? > > > My other concern - besides it perhaps",
"> > > Is this recommendation a good one, or does the possibility",
"possibly unique in that it is written by a student in high school",
"enough levels, though it does rest in part on graduate school - is",
"like to do undergraduate astronomy research as soon as possible in college -",
"if this is okay in the case of my question or not. Is",
"not a question I have in mind is appropriate for Academia Stack Exchange,",
"as many astronomy classes in graduate school as possible (and as few physics",
"in graduate school as possible (and as few physics classes as possible). >",
"college, I need a solid block of astronomy courses. > > > Is",
"the possibility of research make it inadvertently backwards? > > > My other",
"few astronomy classes in college as possible (and as many physics classes as",
"research as soon as possible in college - I'm already doing some independent",
"as many physics classes as possible) and to take as many astronomy classes",
"many astronomy classes in graduate school as possible (and as few physics classes",
"can't tell if this is okay in the case of my question or",
"is appropriate for Academia Stack Exchange, so I decided to ask about it",
"as few astronomy classes in college as possible (and as many physics classes",
"decided to ask about it on meta. It's possibly unique in that it",
"- and to do research in college, I need a solid block of",
"a little opinion-based. I've read through many questions on Academia, and it seems",
"possible). > > > This seems like wise advice - you need to",
"once talked with a professor of astronomy - my hopeful major/specialty - at",
"these lines: > > I once talked with a professor of astronomy -",
"you need to focus on the basics before moving on to things that",
"that I'd like to do undergraduate astronomy research as soon as possible in",
"considering how those curricula would be relevant to graduate school. My question would",
"few physics classes as possible). > > > This seems like wise advice",
"He said that the key to doing well in the field is to",
"on to things that may be more advanced. The problem, though, is that",
"independent work at the moment - and to do research in college, I",
"block of astronomy courses. > > > Is this recommendation a good one,",
"them. However, I can't tell if this is okay in the case of",
"at a college. He said that the key to doing well in the",
"well in the field is to take as few astronomy classes in college",
"have in mind is appropriate for Academia Stack Exchange, so I decided to",
"that may be more advanced. The problem, though, is that I'd like to",
"> > My other concern - besides it perhaps not being relevant to",
"whether or not a question I have in mind is appropriate for Academia",
"be more advanced. The problem, though, is that I'd like to do undergraduate",
"doing some independent work at the moment - and to do research in",
"this recommendation a good one, or does the possibility of research make it",
"to high enough levels, though it does rest in part on graduate school",
"for Academia Stack Exchange, so I decided to ask about it on meta.",
"appropriate for Academia Stack Exchange, so I decided to ask about it on",
"there is room for opinion in many of them. However, I can't tell",
"moment - and to do research in college, I need a solid block",
"like wise advice - you need to focus on the basics before moving",
"focus on the basics before moving on to things that may be more",
"concern - besides it perhaps not being relevant to high enough levels, though",
"to doing well in the field is to take as few astronomy classes",
"good one, or does the possibility of research make it inadvertently backwards? >",
"though it does rest in part on graduate school - is that it",
"school - is that it seems a little opinion-based. I've read through many",
"written by a student in high school looking at college curricula while considering",
"would be relevant to graduate school. My question would be along these lines:",
"school looking at college curricula while considering how those curricula would be relevant",
"and to do research in college, I need a solid block of astronomy",
"rest in part on graduate school - is that it seems a little",
"curricula would be relevant to graduate school. My question would be along these",
"a college. He said that the key to doing well in the field",
"in that it is written by a student in high school looking at",
"of astronomy courses. > > > Is this recommendation a good one, or",
"backwards? > > > My other concern - besides it perhaps not being",
"as possible (and as many physics classes as possible) and to take as",
"in the case of my question or not. Is this question okay for",
"- is that it seems a little opinion-based. I've read through many questions",
"not being relevant to high enough levels, though it does rest in part",
"inadvertently backwards? > > > My other concern - besides it perhaps not",
"I'm a bit unsure as to whether or not a question I have",
"okay in the case of my question or not. Is this question okay",
"it seems a little opinion-based. I've read through many questions on Academia, and",
"to whether or not a question I have in mind is appropriate for",
"solid block of astronomy courses. > > > Is this recommendation a good",
"It's possibly unique in that it is written by a student in high",
"seems like wise advice - you need to focus on the basics before",
"as possible (and as few physics classes as possible). > > > This",
"the basics before moving on to things that may be more advanced. The",
"the field is to take as few astronomy classes in college as possible",
"with a professor of astronomy - my hopeful major/specialty - at a college.",
"to do undergraduate astronomy research as soon as possible in college - I'm",
"part on graduate school - is that it seems a little opinion-based. I've",
"things that may be more advanced. The problem, though, is that I'd like",
"soon as possible in college - I'm already doing some independent work at",
"a solid block of astronomy courses. > > > Is this recommendation a",
"a student in high school looking at college curricula while considering how those",
"- besides it perhaps not being relevant to high enough levels, though it",
"of my question or not. Is this question okay for Academia Stack Exchange?",
"seems like there is room for opinion in many of them. However, I",
"school as possible (and as few physics classes as possible). > > >",
"it seems like there is room for opinion in many of them. However,",
"> Is this recommendation a good one, or does the possibility of research",
"it does rest in part on graduate school - is that it seems",
"unique in that it is written by a student in high school looking",
"student in high school looking at college curricula while considering how those curricula",
"work at the moment - and to do research in college, I need",
"may be more advanced. The problem, though, is that I'd like to do",
"said that the key to doing well in the field is to take",
"of them. However, I can't tell if this is okay in the case",
"do undergraduate astronomy research as soon as possible in college - I'm already",
"being relevant to high enough levels, though it does rest in part on",
"field is to take as few astronomy classes in college as possible (and",
"I'd like to do undergraduate astronomy research as soon as possible in college",
"I decided to ask about it on meta. It's possibly unique in that",
"at the moment - and to do research in college, I need a",
"I need a solid block of astronomy courses. > > > Is this",
"to take as many astronomy classes in graduate school as possible (and as",
"on Academia, and it seems like there is room for opinion in many",
"on meta. It's possibly unique in that it is written by a student",
"> This seems like wise advice - you need to focus on the",
"on the basics before moving on to things that may be more advanced.",
"graduate school. My question would be along these lines: > > I once",
"it is written by a student in high school looking at college curricula",
"doing well in the field is to take as few astronomy classes in",
"be relevant to graduate school. My question would be along these lines: >",
"high school looking at college curricula while considering how those curricula would be",
"is that I'd like to do undergraduate astronomy research as soon as possible",
"that it is written by a student in high school looking at college",
"besides it perhaps not being relevant to high enough levels, though it does",
"ask about it on meta. It's possibly unique in that it is written",
"tell if this is okay in the case of my question or not.",
"or not a question I have in mind is appropriate for Academia Stack",
"bit unsure as to whether or not a question I have in mind",
"in the field is to take as few astronomy classes in college as",
"I once talked with a professor of astronomy - my hopeful major/specialty -",
"is that it seems a little opinion-based. I've read through many questions on",
"those curricula would be relevant to graduate school. My question would be along",
"> My other concern - besides it perhaps not being relevant to high",
"room for opinion in many of them. However, I can't tell if this",
"possible (and as few physics classes as possible). > > > This seems",
"- at a college. He said that the key to doing well in",
"classes as possible). > > > This seems like wise advice - you",
"my hopeful major/specialty - at a college. He said that the key to",
"I have in mind is appropriate for Academia Stack Exchange, so I decided",
"problem, though, is that I'd like to do undergraduate astronomy research as soon",
"to graduate school. My question would be along these lines: > > I",
"> > > My other concern - besides it perhaps not being relevant",
"would be along these lines: > > I once talked with a professor",
"levels, though it does rest in part on graduate school - is that",
"I've read through many questions on Academia, and it seems like there is",
"through many questions on Academia, and it seems like there is room for",
"key to doing well in the field is to take as few astronomy",
"> > This seems like wise advice - you need to focus on",
"as possible) and to take as many astronomy classes in graduate school as",
"at college curricula while considering how those curricula would be relevant to graduate",
"of astronomy - my hopeful major/specialty - at a college. He said that",
"- you need to focus on the basics before moving on to things",
"as few physics classes as possible). > > > This seems like wise",
"astronomy courses. > > > Is this recommendation a good one, or does",
"this is okay in the case of my question or not. Is this",
"do research in college, I need a solid block of astronomy courses. >",
"professor of astronomy - my hopeful major/specialty - at a college. He said",
"recommendation a good one, or does the possibility of research make it inadvertently",
"the moment - and to do research in college, I need a solid",
"on graduate school - is that it seems a little opinion-based. I've read",
"little opinion-based. I've read through many questions on Academia, and it seems like",
"more advanced. The problem, though, is that I'd like to do undergraduate astronomy",
"of research make it inadvertently backwards? > > > My other concern -",
"in high school looking at college curricula while considering how those curricula would",
"courses. > > > Is this recommendation a good one, or does the",
"graduate school as possible (and as few physics classes as possible). > >",
"in mind is appropriate for Academia Stack Exchange, so I decided to ask",
"meta. It's possibly unique in that it is written by a student in",
"take as few astronomy classes in college as possible (and as many physics",
"in college, I need a solid block of astronomy courses. > > >",
"to do research in college, I need a solid block of astronomy courses.",
"take as many astronomy classes in graduate school as possible (and as few",
"graduate school - is that it seems a little opinion-based. I've read through",
"to ask about it on meta. It's possibly unique in that it is",
"as possible). > > > This seems like wise advice - you need",
"astronomy research as soon as possible in college - I'm already doing some",
"high enough levels, though it does rest in part on graduate school -",
"a bit unsure as to whether or not a question I have in",
"in part on graduate school - is that it seems a little opinion-based.",
"undergraduate astronomy research as soon as possible in college - I'm already doing",
"make it inadvertently backwards? > > > My other concern - besides it",
"wise advice - you need to focus on the basics before moving on",
"while considering how those curricula would be relevant to graduate school. My question",
"basics before moving on to things that may be more advanced. The problem,",
"and it seems like there is room for opinion in many of them.",
"advice - you need to focus on the basics before moving on to",
"possible in college - I'm already doing some independent work at the moment",
"> > > This seems like wise advice - you need to focus",
"(and as many physics classes as possible) and to take as many astronomy",
"questions on Academia, and it seems like there is room for opinion in",
"possible (and as many physics classes as possible) and to take as many",
"research make it inadvertently backwards? > > > My other concern - besides",
"in many of them. However, I can't tell if this is okay in",
"as possible in college - I'm already doing some independent work at the",
"- my hopeful major/specialty - at a college. He said that the key",
"how those curricula would be relevant to graduate school. My question would be",
"major/specialty - at a college. He said that the key to doing well",
"classes in college as possible (and as many physics classes as possible) and",
"question I have in mind is appropriate for Academia Stack Exchange, so I",
"it perhaps not being relevant to high enough levels, though it does rest",
"seems a little opinion-based. I've read through many questions on Academia, and it",
"one, or does the possibility of research make it inadvertently backwards? > >",
"along these lines: > > I once talked with a professor of astronomy",
"Stack Exchange, so I decided to ask about it on meta. It's possibly",
"Exchange, so I decided to ask about it on meta. It's possibly unique",
"school. My question would be along these lines: > > I once talked",
"already doing some independent work at the moment - and to do research",
"some independent work at the moment - and to do research in college,",
"to take as few astronomy classes in college as possible (and as many",
"astronomy classes in graduate school as possible (and as few physics classes as",
"> I once talked with a professor of astronomy - my hopeful major/specialty",
"unsure as to whether or not a question I have in mind is",
"to things that may be more advanced. The problem, though, is that I'd",
"in college as possible (and as many physics classes as possible) and to",
"classes as possible) and to take as many astronomy classes in graduate school",
"lines: > > I once talked with a professor of astronomy - my",
"college - I'm already doing some independent work at the moment - and",
"a question I have in mind is appropriate for Academia Stack Exchange, so",
"moving on to things that may be more advanced. The problem, though, is",
"other concern - besides it perhaps not being relevant to high enough levels,",
"curricula while considering how those curricula would be relevant to graduate school. My",
"talked with a professor of astronomy - my hopeful major/specialty - at a",
"so I decided to ask about it on meta. It's possibly unique in",
"astronomy classes in college as possible (and as many physics classes as possible)",
"a good one, or does the possibility of research make it inadvertently backwards?",
"the case of my question or not. Is this question okay for Academia",
"advanced. The problem, though, is that I'd like to do undergraduate astronomy research",
"research in college, I need a solid block of astronomy courses. > >",
"relevant to graduate school. My question would be along these lines: > >",
"need to focus on the basics before moving on to things that may",
"to focus on the basics before moving on to things that may be",
"Academia Stack Exchange, so I decided to ask about it on meta. It's",
"is to take as few astronomy classes in college as possible (and as",
"college as possible (and as many physics classes as possible) and to take",
"physics classes as possible) and to take as many astronomy classes in graduate",
"Academia, and it seems like there is room for opinion in many of",
"looking at college curricula while considering how those curricula would be relevant to",
"before moving on to things that may be more advanced. The problem, though,",
"many questions on Academia, and it seems like there is room for opinion",
"for opinion in many of them. However, I can't tell if this is",
"the key to doing well in the field is to take as few",
"question would be along these lines: > > I once talked with a",
"Is this recommendation a good one, or does the possibility of research make",
"I'm already doing some independent work at the moment - and to do",
"it on meta. It's possibly unique in that it is written by a",
"The problem, though, is that I'd like to do undergraduate astronomy research as",
"many of them. However, I can't tell if this is okay in the",
"many physics classes as possible) and to take as many astronomy classes in",
"opinion in many of them. However, I can't tell if this is okay",
"> > Is this recommendation a good one, or does the possibility of",
"about it on meta. It's possibly unique in that it is written by",
"is room for opinion in many of them. However, I can't tell if",
"that the key to doing well in the field is to take as",
"My question would be along these lines: > > I once talked with",
"as to whether or not a question I have in mind is appropriate",
"as soon as possible in college - I'm already doing some independent work",
"is okay in the case of my question or not. Is this question",
"mind is appropriate for Academia Stack Exchange, so I decided to ask about",
"be along these lines: > > I once talked with a professor of",
"possible) and to take as many astronomy classes in graduate school as possible",
"does rest in part on graduate school - is that it seems a",
"relevant to high enough levels, though it does rest in part on graduate",
"(and as few physics classes as possible). > > > This seems like",
"However, I can't tell if this is okay in the case of my",
"is written by a student in high school looking at college curricula while",
"astronomy - my hopeful major/specialty - at a college. He said that the",
"possibility of research make it inadvertently backwards? > > > My other concern",
"- I'm already doing some independent work at the moment - and to",
"read through many questions on Academia, and it seems like there is room",
"by a student in high school looking at college curricula while considering how",
"case of my question or not. Is this question okay for Academia Stack",
"like there is room for opinion in many of them. However, I can't",
"though, is that I'd like to do undergraduate astronomy research as soon as",
"My other concern - besides it perhaps not being relevant to high enough",
"physics classes as possible). > > > This seems like wise advice -",
"This seems like wise advice - you need to focus on the basics",
"or does the possibility of research make it inadvertently backwards? > > >",
"does the possibility of research make it inadvertently backwards? > > > My",
"I can't tell if this is okay in the case of my question",
"a professor of astronomy - my hopeful major/specialty - at a college. He",
"and to take as many astronomy classes in graduate school as possible (and",
"in college - I'm already doing some independent work at the moment -",
"> > I once talked with a professor of astronomy - my hopeful",
"perhaps not being relevant to high enough levels, though it does rest in",
"college. He said that the key to doing well in the field is",
"need a solid block of astronomy courses. > > > Is this recommendation"
] |
[
"by my committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140) * [Disclosing hidden disability to employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140) * [How does Stephen",
"[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and blacklisting [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). *",
"tag, and adding [mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability \"show questions tagged 'mental-disability'\") as a synonym for [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health",
"mental, sensory, emotional, or developmental\" impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info). So [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") seems",
"into the tag box). * **Merge the two concepts**, by retagging the [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health",
"I see three alternatives, the usual upvote=yes, downvote=no meta mechanism won't be useful",
"in a [related post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1588/4140). We recently got two questions tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions",
"nature take its course. --- Given that I see three alternatives, the usual",
"questions, *all but the following* could be tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"):",
"the tag box). * **Merge the two concepts**, by retagging the [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show",
"out of 20 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions, *all but the following*",
"[mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") seems to be a proper subset of [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability",
"black-listing the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") tag, and adding [mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability \"show questions",
"that he is having trouble functioning [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140) Then again, [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged",
"[explicitly covers \"cognitive, mental, sensory, emotional, or developmental\" impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info). So [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions",
"are welcome to correct me.) --- I see a couple of ways to",
"questions really could be retagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). Explicitly, I'd argue",
"a couple of ways to proceed here. * **Clearly separate physical and mental",
"'disability'\") questions [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"), black-listing the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged",
"tagged 'mental-health'\") seems to be a proper subset of [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged",
"got two questions tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [How to overcome",
"tagged 'disability'\") [explicitly covers \"cognitive, mental, sensory, emotional, or developmental\" impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info). So [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health",
"course. --- Given that I see three alternatives, the usual upvote=yes, downvote=no meta",
"my committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140) * [Disclosing hidden disability to employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140) * [How does Stephen Hawking",
"tagged 'mental-health'\") questions to [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and blacklisting [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show",
"to be a proper subset of [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"). --- Then",
"again, most of the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions really could be",
"people find it when they type \"disability\" into the tag box). * **Merge",
"it when they type \"disability\" into the tag box). * **Merge the two",
"usually involve language centers in the brain, unless there is some trauma to",
"**Clearly separate physical and mental disabilities**, by tagging the 4 questions above [physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability",
"Stephen Hawking conduct his research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140) (Yes, I'm putting speech impairments under the \"mental\"",
"tagged 'mental-disability'\") as a synonym for [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") (so people",
"the following* could be tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [Does disability",
"by tagging the 4 questions above [physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability \"show questions tagged 'physical-disability'\"), retagging the",
"a proper subset of [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"). --- Then *yet* again,",
"I'm putting speech impairments under the \"mental\" category here, since they usually involve",
"employment in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140) * [Dismissed by my committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140) * [Disclosing hidden disability to",
"\"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and blacklisting [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). * **Do",
"neurologists etc. are welcome to correct me.) --- I see a couple of",
"covers \"cognitive, mental, sensory, emotional, or developmental\" impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info). So [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged",
"to [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and blacklisting [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\").",
"corresponding to the three alternatives. Please vote your preference, and comment as appropriate.",
"and mental disabilities**, by tagging the 4 questions above [physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability \"show questions tagged",
"questions tagged 'disability'\") questions, *all but the following* could be tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show",
"academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140) * [Dismissed by my committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140) * [Disclosing hidden disability to employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140) *",
"[mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [Does disability impact on prospects of employment",
"in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140) * [“Anonymous” is so distressed that he is having trouble functioning",
"--- Given that I see three alternatives, the usual upvote=yes, downvote=no meta mechanism",
"*all but the following* could be tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): *",
"in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140) * [Dismissed by my committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140) * [Disclosing hidden disability to employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140)",
"'mental-health'\") questions to [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and blacklisting [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions",
"is some trauma to the vocal apparatus. Clinical psychologists, neurologists etc. are welcome",
"couple of ways to proceed here. * **Clearly separate physical and mental disabilities**,",
"for [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") (so people find it when they type",
"nothing**, and let nature take its course. --- Given that I see three",
"psychologists, neurologists etc. are welcome to correct me.) --- I see a couple",
"developmental\" impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info). So [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") seems to be a proper",
"questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). Explicitly, I'd argue that out of 20 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions",
"adding [mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability \"show questions tagged 'mental-disability'\") as a synonym for [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions",
"So I'll create three answers corresponding to the three alternatives. Please vote your",
"hidden disability to employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140) * [How does Stephen Hawking conduct his research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140) (Yes,",
"[duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140) Then again, [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") [explicitly covers \"cognitive, mental, sensory,",
"seems to be a proper subset of [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"). ---",
"[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") tag, and adding [mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability \"show questions tagged 'mental-disability'\")",
"see three alternatives, the usual upvote=yes, downvote=no meta mechanism won't be useful here.",
"proceed here. * **Clearly separate physical and mental disabilities**, by tagging the 4",
"take its course. --- Given that I see three alternatives, the usual upvote=yes,",
"\"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") questions to [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and blacklisting",
"(so people find it when they type \"disability\" into the tag box). *",
"be tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [Does disability impact on prospects",
"questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [Does disability impact on prospects of employment in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140)",
"questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). * **Do nothing**, and let nature take its course. ---",
"here. * **Clearly separate physical and mental disabilities**, by tagging the 4 questions",
"discussed this in a [related post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1588/4140). We recently got two questions tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health",
"disability impact on prospects of employment in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140) * [Dismissed by my committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140)",
"[Does disability impact on prospects of employment in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140) * [Dismissed by my",
"\"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"), black-listing the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") tag, and",
"questions tagged 'mental-health'\") questions to [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and blacklisting [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health",
"above [physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability \"show questions tagged 'physical-disability'\"), retagging the other 16 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions",
"'mental-health'\"): * [How to overcome these learning difficulties and progress in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140) *",
"'disability'\"). --- Then *yet* again, most of the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\")",
"they type \"disability\" into the tag box). * **Merge the two concepts**, by",
"be useful here. So I'll create three answers corresponding to the three alternatives.",
"[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions really could be retagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions",
"tagged 'disability'\") questions really could be retagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). Explicitly,",
"* **Merge the two concepts**, by retagging the [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\")",
"involve language centers in the brain, unless there is some trauma to the",
"employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140) * [How does Stephen Hawking conduct his research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140) (Yes, I'm putting speech",
"in the brain, unless there is some trauma to the vocal apparatus. Clinical",
"the vocal apparatus. Clinical psychologists, neurologists etc. are welcome to correct me.) ---",
"[How to overcome these learning difficulties and progress in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140) * [“Anonymous” is",
"distressed that he is having trouble functioning [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140) Then again, [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions",
"that out of 20 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions, *all but the",
"really could be retagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). Explicitly, I'd argue that",
"the 4 questions above [physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability \"show questions tagged 'physical-disability'\"), retagging the other 16",
"tagged 'mental-health'\") (so people find it when they type \"disability\" into the tag",
"[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"). --- Then *yet* again, most of the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability",
"three alternatives, the usual upvote=yes, downvote=no meta mechanism won't be useful here. So",
"the \"mental\" category here, since they usually involve language centers in the brain,",
"as a synonym for [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") (so people find it",
"of ways to proceed here. * **Clearly separate physical and mental disabilities**, by",
"'mental-health'\"). Explicitly, I'd argue that out of 20 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\")",
"and adding [mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability \"show questions tagged 'mental-disability'\") as a synonym for [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show",
"unless there is some trauma to the vocal apparatus. Clinical psychologists, neurologists etc.",
"language centers in the brain, unless there is some trauma to the vocal",
"usual upvote=yes, downvote=no meta mechanism won't be useful here. So I'll create three",
"Explicitly, I'd argue that out of 20 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions,",
"to correct me.) --- I see a couple of ways to proceed here.",
"on prospects of employment in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140) * [Dismissed by my committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140) * [Disclosing",
"tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [Does disability impact on prospects of",
"apparatus. Clinical psychologists, neurologists etc. are welcome to correct me.) --- I see",
"I'd argue that out of 20 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions, *all",
"since they usually involve language centers in the brain, unless there is some",
"questions tagged 'physical-disability'\"), retagging the other 16 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions",
"[“Anonymous” is so distressed that he is having trouble functioning [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140) Then again,",
"under the \"mental\" category here, since they usually involve language centers in the",
"\"show questions tagged 'mental-disability'\") as a synonym for [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\")",
"difficulties and progress in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140) * [“Anonymous” is so distressed that he is",
"putting speech impairments under the \"mental\" category here, since they usually involve language",
"progress in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140) * [“Anonymous” is so distressed that he is having trouble",
"retagging the other 16 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions",
"tagging the 4 questions above [physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability \"show questions tagged 'physical-disability'\"), retagging the other",
"'disability'\") [explicitly covers \"cognitive, mental, sensory, emotional, or developmental\" impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info). So [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show",
"could be tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [Does disability impact on",
"questions tagged 'mental-health'\"), black-listing the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") tag, and adding",
"'mental-health'\"), black-listing the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") tag, and adding [mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability \"show",
"**Merge the two concepts**, by retagging the [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") questions",
"etc. are welcome to correct me.) --- I see a couple of ways",
"brain, unless there is some trauma to the vocal apparatus. Clinical psychologists, neurologists",
"questions tagged 'disability'\") questions really could be retagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\").",
"these learning difficulties and progress in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140) * [“Anonymous” is so distressed that",
"\"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). * **Do nothing**, and let nature take its course.",
"separate physical and mental disabilities**, by tagging the 4 questions above [physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability \"show",
"following* could be tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [Does disability impact",
"speech impairments under the \"mental\" category here, since they usually involve language centers",
"[mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). * **Do nothing**, and let nature take its",
"useful here. So I'll create three answers corresponding to the three alternatives. Please",
"[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") [explicitly covers \"cognitive, mental, sensory, emotional, or developmental\"",
"\"cognitive, mental, sensory, emotional, or developmental\" impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info). So [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\")",
"Given that I see three alternatives, the usual upvote=yes, downvote=no meta mechanism won't",
"be a proper subset of [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"). --- Then *yet*",
"[How does Stephen Hawking conduct his research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140) (Yes, I'm putting speech impairments under",
"vocal apparatus. Clinical psychologists, neurologists etc. are welcome to correct me.) --- I",
"\"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"), black-listing the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability",
"questions tagged 'disability'\") [explicitly covers \"cognitive, mental, sensory, emotional, or developmental\" impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info). So",
"[mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") (so people find it when they type \"disability\"",
"* [“Anonymous” is so distressed that he is having trouble functioning [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140) Then",
"so distressed that he is having trouble functioning [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140) Then again, [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show",
"answers corresponding to the three alternatives. Please vote your preference, and comment as",
"three answers corresponding to the three alternatives. Please vote your preference, and comment",
"ways to proceed here. * **Clearly separate physical and mental disabilities**, by tagging",
"find it when they type \"disability\" into the tag box). * **Merge the",
"a [related post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1588/4140). We recently got two questions tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged",
"20 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions, *all but the following* could be",
"some trauma to the vocal apparatus. Clinical psychologists, neurologists etc. are welcome to",
"its course. --- Given that I see three alternatives, the usual upvote=yes, downvote=no",
"'mental-disability'\") as a synonym for [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") (so people find",
"to the vocal apparatus. Clinical psychologists, neurologists etc. are welcome to correct me.)",
"of the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions really could be retagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health",
"\"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions really could be retagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged",
"tagged 'mental-health'\"). * **Do nothing**, and let nature take its course. --- Given",
"tagged 'disability'\") questions, *all but the following* could be tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions",
"Clinical psychologists, neurologists etc. are welcome to correct me.) --- I see a",
"* **Do nothing**, and let nature take its course. --- Given that I",
"the two concepts**, by retagging the [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") questions to",
"disabilities**, by tagging the 4 questions above [physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability \"show questions tagged 'physical-disability'\"), retagging",
"post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1588/4140). We recently got two questions tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): *",
"questions tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [How to overcome these learning",
"[mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability \"show questions tagged 'mental-disability'\") as a synonym for [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged",
"*yet* again, most of the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions really could",
"of [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"). --- Then *yet* again, most of the",
"We recently got two questions tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [How",
"two questions tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [How to overcome these",
"of 20 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions, *all but the following* could",
"his research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140) (Yes, I'm putting speech impairments under the \"mental\" category here, since",
"'disability'\") tag, and adding [mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability \"show questions tagged 'mental-disability'\") as a synonym for",
"meta mechanism won't be useful here. So I'll create three answers corresponding to",
"other 16 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"),",
"questions tagged 'disability'\") and blacklisting [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). * **Do nothing**,",
"\"show questions tagged 'disability'\") [explicitly covers \"cognitive, mental, sensory, emotional, or developmental\" impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info).",
"blacklisting [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). * **Do nothing**, and let nature take",
"subset of [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"). --- Then *yet* again, most of",
"'disability'\") questions, *all but the following* could be tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged",
"the [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") questions to [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\")",
"[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"), black-listing the",
"Hawking conduct his research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140) (Yes, I'm putting speech impairments under the \"mental\" category",
"they usually involve language centers in the brain, unless there is some trauma",
"two concepts**, by retagging the [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") questions to [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability",
"[physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability \"show questions tagged 'physical-disability'\"), retagging the other 16 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged",
"let nature take its course. --- Given that I see three alternatives, the",
"committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140) * [Disclosing hidden disability to employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140) * [How does Stephen Hawking conduct",
"\"show questions tagged 'disability'\"). --- Then *yet* again, most of the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show",
"impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info). So [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") seems to be a proper subset",
"questions [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"), black-listing the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\")",
"argue that out of 20 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions, *all but",
"\"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions, *all but the following* could be tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health",
"category here, since they usually involve language centers in the brain, unless there",
"by retagging the [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") questions to [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions",
"the usual upvote=yes, downvote=no meta mechanism won't be useful here. So I'll create",
"I'll create three answers corresponding to the three alternatives. Please vote your preference,",
"trauma to the vocal apparatus. Clinical psychologists, neurologists etc. are welcome to correct",
"**Do nothing**, and let nature take its course. --- Given that I see",
"proper subset of [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"). --- Then *yet* again, most",
"here. So I'll create three answers corresponding to the three alternatives. Please vote",
"tagged 'mental-health'\"). Explicitly, I'd argue that out of 20 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged",
"\"show questions tagged 'physical-disability'\"), retagging the other 16 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\")",
"\"mental\" category here, since they usually involve language centers in the brain, unless",
"\"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") seems to be a proper subset of [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show",
"* [How to overcome these learning difficulties and progress in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140) * [“Anonymous”",
"physical and mental disabilities**, by tagging the 4 questions above [physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability \"show questions",
"\"disability\" into the tag box). * **Merge the two concepts**, by retagging the",
"retagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). Explicitly, I'd argue that out of 20",
"questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [How to overcome these learning difficulties and progress in",
"to employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140) * [How does Stephen Hawking conduct his research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140) (Yes, I'm putting",
"and let nature take its course. --- Given that I see three alternatives,",
"overcome these learning difficulties and progress in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140) * [“Anonymous” is so distressed",
"questions tagged 'mental-disability'\") as a synonym for [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") (so",
"tagged 'mental-health'\"), black-listing the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") tag, and adding [mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability",
"'disability'\") and blacklisting [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). * **Do nothing**, and let",
"this in a [related post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1588/4140). We recently got two questions tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show",
"questions tagged 'mental-health'\") seems to be a proper subset of [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions",
"'mental-health'\"): * [Does disability impact on prospects of employment in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140) * [Dismissed",
"* **Clearly separate physical and mental disabilities**, by tagging the 4 questions above",
"the other 16 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged",
"tagged 'disability'\") and blacklisting [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). * **Do nothing**, and",
"prospects of employment in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140) * [Dismissed by my committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140) * [Disclosing hidden",
"questions tagged 'disability'\") tag, and adding [mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability \"show questions tagged 'mental-disability'\") as a",
"alternatives, the usual upvote=yes, downvote=no meta mechanism won't be useful here. So I'll",
"again, [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") [explicitly covers \"cognitive, mental, sensory, emotional, or",
"functioning [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140) Then again, [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") [explicitly covers \"cognitive, mental,",
"16 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"), black-listing",
"(Yes, I'm putting speech impairments under the \"mental\" category here, since they usually",
"mechanism won't be useful here. So I'll create three answers corresponding to the",
"academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140) * [“Anonymous” is so distressed that he is having trouble functioning [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140)",
"--- Then *yet* again, most of the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions",
"here, since they usually involve language centers in the brain, unless there is",
"box). * **Merge the two concepts**, by retagging the [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged",
"Then again, [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") [explicitly covers \"cognitive, mental, sensory, emotional,",
"upvote=yes, downvote=no meta mechanism won't be useful here. So I'll create three answers",
"disability to employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140) * [How does Stephen Hawking conduct his research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140) (Yes, I'm",
"[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions, *all but the following* could be tagged",
"retagging the [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") questions to [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged",
"of employment in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140) * [Dismissed by my committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140) * [Disclosing hidden disability",
"\"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") (so people find it when they type \"disability\" into",
"won't be useful here. So I'll create three answers corresponding to the three",
"[related post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1588/4140). We recently got two questions tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"):",
"having trouble functioning [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140) Then again, [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") [explicitly covers",
"tagged 'physical-disability'\"), retagging the other 16 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health",
"most of the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions really could be retagged",
"a synonym for [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") (so people find it when",
"* [How does Stephen Hawking conduct his research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140) (Yes, I'm putting speech impairments",
"research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140) (Yes, I'm putting speech impairments under the \"mental\" category here, since they",
"tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [How to overcome these learning difficulties",
"but the following* could be tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [Does",
"--- I see a couple of ways to proceed here. * **Clearly separate",
"type \"disability\" into the tag box). * **Merge the two concepts**, by retagging",
"and progress in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140) * [“Anonymous” is so distressed that he is having",
"impairments under the \"mental\" category here, since they usually involve language centers in",
"* [Disclosing hidden disability to employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140) * [How does Stephen Hawking conduct his",
"he is having trouble functioning [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140) Then again, [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\")",
"4 questions above [physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability \"show questions tagged 'physical-disability'\"), retagging the other 16 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability",
"'physical-disability'\"), retagging the other 16 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show",
"or developmental\" impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info). So [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") seems to be a",
"tagged 'disability'\"). --- Then *yet* again, most of the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged",
"We kind-of discussed this in a [related post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1588/4140). We recently got two questions",
"\"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [How to overcome these learning difficulties and progress",
"could be retagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). Explicitly, I'd argue that out",
"see a couple of ways to proceed here. * **Clearly separate physical and",
"* [Does disability impact on prospects of employment in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140) * [Dismissed by",
"the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions really could be retagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show",
"the brain, unless there is some trauma to the vocal apparatus. Clinical psychologists,",
"impact on prospects of employment in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140) * [Dismissed by my committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140) *",
"is so distressed that he is having trouble functioning [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140) Then again, [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability",
"\"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [Does disability impact on prospects of employment in",
"'mental-health'\"). * **Do nothing**, and let nature take its course. --- Given that",
"centers in the brain, unless there is some trauma to the vocal apparatus.",
"recently got two questions tagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [How to",
"kind-of discussed this in a [related post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1588/4140). We recently got two questions tagged",
"questions tagged 'disability'\"). --- Then *yet* again, most of the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions",
"to overcome these learning difficulties and progress in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140) * [“Anonymous” is so",
"\"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). Explicitly, I'd argue that out of 20 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show",
"sensory, emotional, or developmental\" impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info). So [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") seems to",
"when they type \"disability\" into the tag box). * **Merge the two concepts**,",
"* [Dismissed by my committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140) * [Disclosing hidden disability to employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140) * [How",
"[mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"), black-listing the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") tag,",
"does Stephen Hawking conduct his research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140) (Yes, I'm putting speech impairments under the",
"[mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). Explicitly, I'd argue that out of 20 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability",
"[Dismissed by my committee](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2808/4140) * [Disclosing hidden disability to employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140) * [How does",
"'mental-health'\") seems to be a proper subset of [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\").",
"tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [How to overcome these learning difficulties and progress in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140)",
"Then *yet* again, most of the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") questions really",
"questions tagged 'disability'\") questions [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"), black-listing the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show",
"synonym for [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") (so people find it when they",
"tagged 'disability'\") questions [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"), black-listing the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions",
"there is some trauma to the vocal apparatus. Clinical psychologists, neurologists etc. are",
"concepts**, by retagging the [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") questions to [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show",
"[mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [How to overcome these learning difficulties and",
"is having trouble functioning [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140) Then again, [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") [explicitly",
"me.) --- I see a couple of ways to proceed here. * **Clearly",
"[Disclosing hidden disability to employer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/43062/4140) * [How does Stephen Hawking conduct his research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140)",
"tagged 'disability'\") tag, and adding [mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability \"show questions tagged 'mental-disability'\") as a synonym",
"that I see three alternatives, the usual upvote=yes, downvote=no meta mechanism won't be",
"correct me.) --- I see a couple of ways to proceed here. *",
"questions to [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and blacklisting [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged",
"'disability'\") questions really could be retagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). Explicitly, I'd",
"be retagged [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). Explicitly, I'd argue that out of",
"downvote=no meta mechanism won't be useful here. So I'll create three answers corresponding",
"I see a couple of ways to proceed here. * **Clearly separate physical",
"questions tagged 'mental-health'\") (so people find it when they type \"disability\" into the",
"'mental-health'\") (so people find it when they type \"disability\" into the tag box).",
"and blacklisting [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\"). * **Do nothing**, and let nature",
"create three answers corresponding to the three alternatives. Please vote your preference, and",
"emotional, or developmental\" impairments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/disability/info). So [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") seems to be",
"conduct his research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/41576/4140) (Yes, I'm putting speech impairments under the \"mental\" category here,",
"questions above [physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability \"show questions tagged 'physical-disability'\"), retagging the other 16 [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show",
"\"show questions tagged 'disability'\") tag, and adding [mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability \"show questions tagged 'mental-disability'\") as",
"trouble functioning [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46032/4140) Then again, [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") [explicitly covers \"cognitive,",
"tagged 'mental-health'\"): * [Does disability impact on prospects of employment in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2901/4140) *",
"learning difficulties and progress in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/46936/4140) * [“Anonymous” is so distressed that he",
"So [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") seems to be a proper subset of",
"welcome to correct me.) --- I see a couple of ways to proceed",
"[mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions tagged 'mental-health'\") questions to [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and",
"mental disabilities**, by tagging the 4 questions above [physical-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/physical-disability \"show questions tagged 'physical-disability'\"),",
"tag box). * **Merge the two concepts**, by retagging the [mental-health](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-health \"show questions",
"to proceed here. * **Clearly separate physical and mental disabilities**, by tagging the",
"the [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") tag, and adding [mental-disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mental-disability \"show questions tagged"
] |