Split (1)

train · 10.4M rows

ngram listlengths 0 10.5k
[ "upvotes.The same can be said of any other legal related question. So, should", "as off-topic because it's about the legalese of a specific geographic region and", "academia. > > > The comment has, at the time of writing, 11", "Cape Code says: > > I'm voting to close this question as off-topic", "geographic region and not about academia. > > > The comment has, at", "> > > The comment has, at the time of writing, 11 upvotes.The", "can be said of any other legal related question. So, should we close", "region and not about academia. > > > The comment has, at the", "question as off-topic because it's about the legalese of a specific geographic region", "11 upvotes.The same can be said of any other legal related question. So,", "it's about the legalese of a specific geographic region and not about academia.", "the time of writing, 11 upvotes.The same can be said of any other", "voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the legalese of", "off-topic because it's about the legalese of a specific geographic region and not", "about academia. > > > The comment has, at the time of writing,", "comment has, at the time of writing, 11 upvotes.The same can be said", "any other legal related question. So, should we close all legal related questions", "specific geographic region and not about academia. > > > The comment has,", "The comment has, at the time of writing, 11 upvotes.The same can be", "to close this question as off-topic because it's about the legalese of a", "not about academia. > > > The comment has, at the time of", "at the time of writing, 11 upvotes.The same can be said of any", "I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the legalese", "> I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about the", "a specific geographic region and not about academia. > > > The comment", "related question. So, should we close all legal related questions as too localised?", "the legalese of a specific geographic region and not about academia. > >", "of a specific geographic region and not about academia. > > > The", "about the legalese of a specific geographic region and not about academia. >", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77827/what-rights-do-students-in-the-u-s-have-re-gender-pronouns?noredirect=1#comment190504_77827), Cape Code says: > > I'm voting to close this question", "time of writing, 11 upvotes.The same can be said of any other legal", "said of any other legal related question. So, should we close all legal", "In [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77827/what-rights-do-students-in-the-u-s-have-re-gender-pronouns?noredirect=1#comment190504_77827), Cape Code says: > > I'm voting to close this", "of any other legal related question. So, should we close all legal related", "this question as off-topic because it's about the legalese of a specific geographic", "says: > > I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's", "same can be said of any other legal related question. So, should we", "other legal related question. So, should we close all legal related questions as", "and not about academia. > > > The comment has, at the time", "close this question as off-topic because it's about the legalese of a specific", "of writing, 11 upvotes.The same can be said of any other legal related", "Code says: > > I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because", "because it's about the legalese of a specific geographic region and not about", "writing, 11 upvotes.The same can be said of any other legal related question.", "be said of any other legal related question. So, should we close all", "> > The comment has, at the time of writing, 11 upvotes.The same", "legalese of a specific geographic region and not about academia. > > >", "> The comment has, at the time of writing, 11 upvotes.The same can", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77827/what-rights-do-students-in-the-u-s-have-re-gender-pronouns?noredirect=1#comment190504_77827), Cape Code says: > > I'm voting to close this question as", "> > I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's about", "has, at the time of writing, 11 upvotes.The same can be said of", "legal related question. So, should we close all legal related questions as too" ]
[ "has not indicated gender through posts, avatar, username, discussions, etc. (That can be", "doesn't follow that practice, when referring to User B. In such a case,", "or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the quality of the", "noted: > > One of the community members has approached the moderators with", "be raised, either by User B (wishing to remain gender anonymous on the", "the above-referenced Meta question.) My question is about what happens if a user,", "anonymous on the site), or by a bystander who is concerned that the", "of the discussion. > > > I am not going to ask whether", "about a user who has not indicated gender through posts, avatar, username, discussions,", "discussion. > > > I am not going to ask whether we should", "about what happens if a user, say, User A, doesn't follow that practice,", "going to ask whether we should use gender-neutral language when speaking about a", "usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling out gender", "commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the quality of the discussion. > >", "the quality of the discussion. > > > I am not going to", "to User B. In such a case, can a flag be raised, either", "Specifically, this individual felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or", "is concerned that the gender assumption could affect the quality of the discussion?", "be discussed at the above-referenced Meta question.) My question is about what happens", "this individual felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as", "whether we should use gender-neutral language when speaking about a user who has", "In such a case, can a flag be raised, either by User B", "site), or by a bystander who is concerned that the gender assumption could", "members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\"", "quality of the discussion. > > > I am not going to ask", "of the discussion? In other words, should moderators use their gentle influence, behind", "with a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this", "the discussion. > > > I am not going to ask whether we", "(wishing to remain gender anonymous on the site), or by a bystander who", "moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically,", "referring to User B. In such a case, can a flag be raised,", "a user who has not indicated gender through posts, avatar, username, discussions, etc.", "to ask whether we should use gender-neutral language when speaking about a user", "practice, when referring to User B. In such a case, can a flag", "is about what happens if a user, say, User A, doesn't follow that", "One of the community members has approached the moderators with a concern about", "B. In such a case, can a flag be raised, either by User", "Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3484/73) noted: > > One of the community members has approached the", "etc. (That can be discussed at the above-referenced Meta question.) My question is", "may affect the quality of the discussion. > > > I am not", "(That can be discussed at the above-referenced Meta question.) My question is about", "by a bystander who is concerned that the gender assumption could affect the", "a flag be raised, either by User B (wishing to remain gender anonymous", "a bystander who is concerned that the gender assumption could affect the quality", "username, discussions, etc. (That can be discussed at the above-referenced Meta question.) My", "> One of the community members has approached the moderators with a concern", "indicated gender through posts, avatar, username, discussions, etc. (That can be discussed at", "B (wishing to remain gender anonymous on the site), or by a bystander", "affect the quality of the discussion? In other words, should moderators use their", "bias and may affect the quality of the discussion. > > > I", "when referring to User B. In such a case, can a flag be", "or by a bystander who is concerned that the gender assumption could affect", "gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling", "use gender-neutral language when speaking about a user who has not indicated gender", "I am not going to ask whether we should use gender-neutral language when", "question.) My question is about what happens if a user, say, User A,", "> > > I am not going to ask whether we should use", "to remain gender anonymous on the site), or by a bystander who is", "she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the quality of the discussion. >", "a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual", "that practice, when referring to User B. In such a case, can a", "who has not indicated gender through posts, avatar, username, discussions, etc. (That can", "should use gender-neutral language when speaking about a user who has not indicated", "happens if a user, say, User A, doesn't follow that practice, when referring", "above-referenced Meta question.) My question is about what happens if a user, say,", "user, say, User A, doesn't follow that practice, when referring to User B.", "In other words, should moderators use their gentle influence, behind the scenes, in", "avatar, username, discussions, etc. (That can be discussed at the above-referenced Meta question.)", "A [recent Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3484/73) noted: > > One of the community members has", "amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling out gender in", "the moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members.", "said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the quality of", "User A, doesn't follow that practice, when referring to User B. In such", "gender assumption could affect the quality of the discussion? In other words, should", "[recent Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3484/73) noted: > > One of the community members has approached", "not indicated gender through posts, avatar, username, discussions, etc. (That can be discussed", "can a flag be raised, either by User B (wishing to remain gender", "felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks", "introducing bias and may affect the quality of the discussion. > > >", "a case, can a flag be raised, either by User B (wishing to", "discussed at the above-referenced Meta question.) My question is about what happens if", "has approached the moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our", "follow that practice, when referring to User B. In such a case, can", "community members has approached the moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun usage", "gender anonymous on the site), or by a bystander who is concerned that", "that the gender assumption could affect the quality of the discussion? In other", "the discussion? In other words, should moderators use their gentle influence, behind the", "approached the moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia", "case, can a flag be raised, either by User B (wishing to remain", "question is about what happens if a user, say, User A, doesn't follow", "flag be raised, either by User B (wishing to remain gender anonymous on", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3484/73) noted: > > One of the community members has approached the moderators", "concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt", "a user, say, User A, doesn't follow that practice, when referring to User", "by User B (wishing to remain gender anonymous on the site), or by", "calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias", "if a user, say, User A, doesn't follow that practice, when referring to", "raised, either by User B (wishing to remain gender anonymous on the site),", "other words, should moderators use their gentle influence, behind the scenes, in such", "remain gender anonymous on the site), or by a bystander who is concerned", "of the community members has approached the moderators with a concern about gendered", "when speaking about a user who has not indicated gender through posts, avatar,", "can be discussed at the above-referenced Meta question.) My question is about what", "members has approached the moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst", "about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that", "User B. In such a case, can a flag be raised, either by", "such a case, can a flag be raised, either by User B (wishing", "discussion? In other words, should moderators use their gentle influence, behind the scenes,", "out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and", "words, should moderators use their gentle influence, behind the scenes, in such a", "language when speaking about a user who has not indicated gender through posts,", "individual felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she", "say, User A, doesn't follow that practice, when referring to User B. In", "at the above-referenced Meta question.) My question is about what happens if a", "our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g.,", "and may affect the quality of the discussion. > > > I am", "concerned that the gender assumption could affect the quality of the discussion? In", "My question is about what happens if a user, say, User A, doesn't", "that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing", "we should use gender-neutral language when speaking about a user who has not", "bystander who is concerned that the gender assumption could affect the quality of", "> I am not going to ask whether we should use gender-neutral language", "through posts, avatar, username, discussions, etc. (That can be discussed at the above-referenced", "quality of the discussion? In other words, should moderators use their gentle influence,", "discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the", "should moderators use their gentle influence, behind the scenes, in such a situation?", "Meta question.) My question is about what happens if a user, say, User", "gender through posts, avatar, username, discussions, etc. (That can be discussed at the", "the community members has approached the moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun", "> > I am not going to ask whether we should use gender-neutral", "the site), or by a bystander who is concerned that the gender assumption", "User B (wishing to remain gender anonymous on the site), or by a", "affect the quality of the discussion. > > > I am not going", "user who has not indicated gender through posts, avatar, username, discussions, etc. (That", "the gender assumption could affect the quality of the discussion? In other words,", "could affect the quality of the discussion? In other words, should moderators use", "\"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the quality", "who is concerned that the gender assumption could affect the quality of the", "gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may", "discussions, etc. (That can be discussed at the above-referenced Meta question.) My question", "posts, avatar, username, discussions, etc. (That can be discussed at the above-referenced Meta", "A, doesn't follow that practice, when referring to User B. In such a", "> > One of the community members has approached the moderators with a", "not going to ask whether we should use gender-neutral language when speaking about", "pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling out", "in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect", "on the site), or by a bystander who is concerned that the gender", "Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he", "\"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the quality of the discussion.", "either by User B (wishing to remain gender anonymous on the site), or", "am not going to ask whether we should use gender-neutral language when speaking", "the quality of the discussion? In other words, should moderators use their gentle", "ask whether we should use gender-neutral language when speaking about a user who", "what happens if a user, say, User A, doesn't follow that practice, when", "gender-neutral language when speaking about a user who has not indicated gender through", "speaking about a user who has not indicated gender through posts, avatar, username,", "assumption could affect the quality of the discussion? In other words, should moderators" ]
[ "days ago my advisor shared on social media this platform, and also recommended", "into StackExchange server and pick location and IP information? Do you think I", "IP information? Do you think I should use from now on only anonymous", "shared on social media this platform, and also recommended for everyone at my", "in academia. I am wondering how safe my private data and locations are", "Do you think I should use from now on only anonymous question option", "pick location and IP information? Do you think I should use from now", "and IP information? Do you think I should use from now on only", "social media this platform, and also recommended for everyone at my uni to", "a source of information and how something should be done in academia. I", "safe my private data and locations are here? do I need to delete", "ago my advisor shared on social media this platform, and also recommended for", "wondering how safe my private data and locations are here? do I need", "it as a source of information and how something should be done in", "and how something should be done in academia. I am wondering how safe", "someone with experience in CS can break into StackExchange server and pick location", "server and pick location and IP information? Do you think I should use", "information and how something should be done in academia. I am wondering how", "platform, and also recommended for everyone at my uni to use it as", "something should be done in academia. I am wondering how safe my private", "delete my account? Is someone with experience in CS can break into StackExchange", "uni to use it as a source of information and how something should", "as a source of information and how something should be done in academia.", "also recommended for everyone at my uni to use it as a source", "I need to delete my account? Is someone with experience in CS can", "Is someone with experience in CS can break into StackExchange server and pick", "are here? do I need to delete my account? Is someone with experience", "advisor shared on social media this platform, and also recommended for everyone at", "media this platform, and also recommended for everyone at my uni to use", "my account? Is someone with experience in CS can break into StackExchange server", "do I need to delete my account? Is someone with experience in CS", "everyone at my uni to use it as a source of information and", "should use from now on only anonymous question option and not to use", "can break into StackExchange server and pick location and IP information? Do you", "my uni to use it as a source of information and how something", "information? Do you think I should use from now on only anonymous question", "StackExchange server and pick location and IP information? Do you think I should", "recommended for everyone at my uni to use it as a source of", "on social media this platform, and also recommended for everyone at my uni", "private data and locations are here? do I need to delete my account?", "academia. I am wondering how safe my private data and locations are here?", "source of information and how something should be done in academia. I am", "think I should use from now on only anonymous question option and not", "need to delete my account? Is someone with experience in CS can break", "and also recommended for everyone at my uni to use it as a", "and locations are here? do I need to delete my account? Is someone", "account? Is someone with experience in CS can break into StackExchange server and", "and pick location and IP information? Do you think I should use from", "in CS can break into StackExchange server and pick location and IP information?", "use it as a source of information and how something should be done", "for everyone at my uni to use it as a source of information", "my private data and locations are here? do I need to delete my", "I should use from now on only anonymous question option and not to", "Few days ago my advisor shared on social media this platform, and also", "be done in academia. I am wondering how safe my private data and", "at my uni to use it as a source of information and how", "done in academia. I am wondering how safe my private data and locations", "how safe my private data and locations are here? do I need to", "am wondering how safe my private data and locations are here? do I", "this platform, and also recommended for everyone at my uni to use it", "here? do I need to delete my account? Is someone with experience in", "CS can break into StackExchange server and pick location and IP information? Do", "my advisor shared on social media this platform, and also recommended for everyone", "I am wondering how safe my private data and locations are here? do", "with experience in CS can break into StackExchange server and pick location and", "to delete my account? Is someone with experience in CS can break into", "experience in CS can break into StackExchange server and pick location and IP", "data and locations are here? do I need to delete my account? Is", "how something should be done in academia. I am wondering how safe my", "break into StackExchange server and pick location and IP information? Do you think", "to use it as a source of information and how something should be", "of information and how something should be done in academia. I am wondering", "location and IP information? Do you think I should use from now on", "you think I should use from now on only anonymous question option and", "use from now on only anonymous question option and not to use account?", "locations are here? do I need to delete my account? Is someone with", "should be done in academia. I am wondering how safe my private data" ]
[ "particularly interesting: * [Two years into my PhD program, and Mom is dying", "a similar question to mine, with an answer much better than I could", "have used (stalked?) the StackExchange family of websites, and until recently, couldn't find", "(is it?) but I don't know how to start becoming part of this", "get the key to my professor's lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab) to which I got several", "this online society. --- Two questions I found particularly interesting: * [I don't", "society. --- Two questions I found particularly interesting: * [I don't want to", "Asking and answering questions is more art than science (is it?) but I", "I must in order to get my PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order) * [How to ask dumb", "Two answers I found particularly interesting: * [Two years into my PhD program,", "my advisor insists that I must in order to get my PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order) ", "of this online society. --- Two questions I found particularly interesting: [I", "mice, but my advisor insists that I must in order to get my", "could think of. MUCH better. I recently asked a question [How can I", "it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387) * [How can I get the key to my professor's lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/78352/63352)", "think of. MUCH better. I recently asked a question [How can I get", "becoming part of this online society. --- Two questions I found particularly interesting:", "to which I got several wonderful answers, but my question was closed as", "Should I tell my advisor about it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387) * [How can I get the", "kill any more mice, but my advisor insists that I must in order", "is dying of cancer. Should I tell my advisor about it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387) * [How", "several wonderful answers, but my question was closed as off-topic for understandable reasons.", "get my PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order) * [How to ask dumb questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) Two answers I found", "I found particularly interesting: * [Two years into my PhD program, and Mom", "recently asked a question [How can I get the key to my professor's", "my PhD program, and Mom is dying of cancer. Should I tell my", "with an answer much better than I could think of. MUCH better. I", "to kill any more mice, but my advisor insists that I must in", "question [How can I get the key to my professor's lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab) to", "questions is more art than science (is it?) but I don't know how", "websites, and until recently, couldn't find a need to register: I usually found", "that I must in order to get my PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order) * [How to ask", "better. I recently asked a question [How can I get the key to", "reasons. Asking and answering questions is more art than science (is it?) but", "* [Two years into my PhD program, and Mom is dying of cancer.", "register: I usually found a similar question to mine, with an answer much", "* [How to ask dumb questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) Two answers I found particularly interesting: ", " [I don't want to kill any more mice, but my advisor insists", "MUCH better. I recently asked a question [How can I get the key", "to get my PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order) * [How to ask dumb questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) Two answers I", "any more mice, but my advisor insists that I must in order to", "lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab) to which I got several wonderful answers, but my question was", "art than science (is it?) but I don't know how to start becoming", "start becoming part of this online society. --- Two questions I found particularly", "more art than science (is it?) but I don't know how to start", "ask dumb questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) Two answers I found particularly interesting: * [Two years into", "my advisor about it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387) * [How can I get the key to my", "of websites, and until recently, couldn't find a need to register: I usually", "I could think of. MUCH better. I recently asked a question [How can", "got several wonderful answers, but my question was closed as off-topic for understandable", "I found particularly interesting: * [I don't want to kill any more mice,", "[I don't want to kill any more mice, but my advisor insists that", "science (is it?) but I don't know how to start becoming part of", "professor's lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab) to which I got several wonderful answers, but my question", "family of websites, and until recently, couldn't find a need to register: I", "but my advisor insists that I must in order to get my PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order)", "how to start becoming part of this online society. --- Two questions I", "than I could think of. MUCH better. I recently asked a question [How", "interesting: * [I don't want to kill any more mice, but my advisor", "find a need to register: I usually found a similar question to mine,", "(stalked?) the StackExchange family of websites, and until recently, couldn't find a need", "much better than I could think of. MUCH better. I recently asked a", "and until recently, couldn't find a need to register: I usually found a", "interesting: * [Two years into my PhD program, and Mom is dying of", "a need to register: I usually found a similar question to mine, with", "and answering questions is more art than science (is it?) but I don't", "[How to ask dumb questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) Two answers I found particularly interesting: * [Two", "my PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order) * [How to ask dumb questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) Two answers I found particularly", "to ask dumb questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) Two answers I found particularly interesting: * [Two years", "need to register: I usually found a similar question to mine, with an", "of cancer. Should I tell my advisor about it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387) * [How can I", "the StackExchange family of websites, and until recently, couldn't find a need to", "answers I found particularly interesting: * [Two years into my PhD program, and", "found particularly interesting: * [Two years into my PhD program, and Mom is", "know how to start becoming part of this online society. --- Two questions", "program, and Mom is dying of cancer. Should I tell my advisor about", "I tell my advisor about it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387) * [How can I get the key", "more mice, but my advisor insists that I must in order to get", "I usually found a similar question to mine, with an answer much better", "used (stalked?) the StackExchange family of websites, and until recently, couldn't find a", "wonderful answers, but my question was closed as off-topic for understandable reasons. Asking", "want to kill any more mice, but my advisor insists that I must", "don't want to kill any more mice, but my advisor insists that I", "Two questions I found particularly interesting: * [I don't want to kill any", "as off-topic for understandable reasons. Asking and answering questions is more art than", "cancer. Should I tell my advisor about it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387) * [How can I get", "--- Two questions I found particularly interesting: * [I don't want to kill", "recently, couldn't find a need to register: I usually found a similar question", "online society. --- Two questions I found particularly interesting: * [I don't want", "to register: I usually found a similar question to mine, with an answer", "better than I could think of. MUCH better. I recently asked a question", "part of this online society. --- Two questions I found particularly interesting: ", "of. MUCH better. I recently asked a question [How can I get the", "answers, but my question was closed as off-topic for understandable reasons. Asking and", "I recently asked a question [How can I get the key to my", "it?) but I don't know how to start becoming part of this online", "PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order) [How to ask dumb questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) Two answers I found particularly interesting:", "advisor insists that I must in order to get my PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order) * [How", "closed as off-topic for understandable reasons. Asking and answering questions is more art", "than science (is it?) but I don't know how to start becoming part", "into my PhD program, and Mom is dying of cancer. Should I tell", "about it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387) * [How can I get the key to my professor's lab?", "StackExchange family of websites, and until recently, couldn't find a need to register:", "I get the key to my professor's lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab) to which I got", "the key to my professor's lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab) to which I got several wonderful", "an answer much better than I could think of. MUCH better. I recently", "asked a question [How can I get the key to my professor's lab?", "questions I found particularly interesting: * [I don't want to kill any more", "and Mom is dying of cancer. Should I tell my advisor about it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387)", "particularly interesting: * [I don't want to kill any more mice, but my", "answer much better than I could think of. MUCH better. I recently asked", "a question [How can I get the key to my professor's lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab)", "answering questions is more art than science (is it?) but I don't know", "insists that I must in order to get my PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order) * [How to", "until recently, couldn't find a need to register: I usually found a similar", "off-topic for understandable reasons. Asking and answering questions is more art than science", "dying of cancer. Should I tell my advisor about it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387) * [How can", "but I don't know how to start becoming part of this online society.", "[Two years into my PhD program, and Mom is dying of cancer. Should", "I don't know how to start becoming part of this online society. ---", "understandable reasons. Asking and answering questions is more art than science (is it?)", "to mine, with an answer much better than I could think of. MUCH", "question was closed as off-topic for understandable reasons. Asking and answering questions is", "must in order to get my PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order) * [How to ask dumb questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions)", "was closed as off-topic for understandable reasons. Asking and answering questions is more", "to my professor's lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab) to which I got several wonderful answers, but", "usually found a similar question to mine, with an answer much better than", "key to my professor's lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab) to which I got several wonderful answers,", "is more art than science (is it?) but I don't know how to", "couldn't find a need to register: I usually found a similar question to", "question to mine, with an answer much better than I could think of.", "for understandable reasons. Asking and answering questions is more art than science (is", "tell my advisor about it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387) * [How can I get the key to", "similar question to mine, with an answer much better than I could think", "but my question was closed as off-topic for understandable reasons. Asking and answering", "dumb questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) Two answers I found particularly interesting: * [Two years into my", "[closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab) to which I got several wonderful answers, but my question was closed", "[How can I get the key to my professor's lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab) to which", "my professor's lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab) to which I got several wonderful answers, but my", "advisor about it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387) * [How can I get the key to my professor's", "can I get the key to my professor's lab? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/78350/how-can-i-get-the-key-to-my-professors-lab) to which I", "don't know how to start becoming part of this online society. --- Two", "found particularly interesting: * [I don't want to kill any more mice, but", "years into my PhD program, and Mom is dying of cancer. Should I", "I got several wonderful answers, but my question was closed as off-topic for", "mine, with an answer much better than I could think of. MUCH better.", "I have used (stalked?) the StackExchange family of websites, and until recently, couldn't", "order to get my PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order) * [How to ask dumb questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) Two answers", "questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) Two answers I found particularly interesting: * [Two years into my PhD", "to start becoming part of this online society. --- Two questions I found", "my question was closed as off-topic for understandable reasons. Asking and answering questions", "in order to get my PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/67897/i-dont-want-to-kill-any-more-mice-but-my-advisor-insists-that-i-must-in-order) * [How to ask dumb questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) Two", "PhD program, and Mom is dying of cancer. Should I tell my advisor", "found a similar question to mine, with an answer much better than I", "which I got several wonderful answers, but my question was closed as off-topic", "Mom is dying of cancer. Should I tell my advisor about it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52386/two-years-into-my-phd-program-and-mom-is-dying-of-cancer-should-i-tell-my-advi/52387#52387) *" ]
[ "issue. He has expressed clearly, multiple times, that (a) he is in agreement", "correct word.) Or should I just have flagged his question to try to", "his question and deleted it twice and now here it is again for", "academic issue. He has expressed clearly, multiple times, that (a) he is in", "Or should I just have flagged his question to try to do this?", "that (b) his anxiety persists and is acute. He states that he has", "anxiety about an academic issue. He has expressed clearly, multiple times, that (a)", "(I'm not sure if \"thread\" is the correct word.) Or should I just", "have flagged his question to try to do this? I don't think my", "it unethical of me and can I get in trouble if a professor", "that he has posted his question and deleted it twice and now here", "time: [Is it unethical of me and can I get in trouble if", "class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436) I wrote an answer which has disappeared along with one of his", "which has disappeared along with one of his deletions. I would like to", "user is experiencing high anxiety about an academic issue. He has expressed clearly,", "the third time: [Is it unethical of me and can I get in", "would show up? (I'm not sure if \"thread\" is the correct word.) Or", "recover this answer and repost it at his new question. Can the moderators", "has tried to reassure him, but that (b) his anxiety persists and is", "is again for the third time: [Is it unethical of me and can", "do this? I don't think my request would fit in the flag box....", "I just have flagged his question to try to do this? I don't", "\"thread\" is the correct word.) Or should I just have flagged his question", "his multiple threads, so my answer would show up? (I'm not sure if", "with one of his deletions. I would like to recover this answer and", "at his new question. Can the moderators merge his multiple threads, so my", "if \"thread\" is the correct word.) Or should I just have flagged his", "me and can I get in trouble if a professor passes me based", "attending class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436) I wrote an answer which has disappeared along with one of", "passes me based on an oral exam without attending class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436) I wrote an", "who has tried to reassure him, but that (b) his anxiety persists and", "twice and now here it is again for the third time: [Is it", "and can I get in trouble if a professor passes me based on", "has expressed clearly, multiple times, that (a) he is in agreement with everyone", "multiple times, that (a) he is in agreement with everyone who has tried", "(b) his anxiety persists and is acute. He states that he has posted", "to reassure him, but that (b) his anxiety persists and is acute. He", "should I just have flagged his question to try to do this? I", "now here it is again for the third time: [Is it unethical of", "persists and is acute. He states that he has posted his question and", "[Is it unethical of me and can I get in trouble if a", "to recover this answer and repost it at his new question. Can the", "acute. He states that he has posted his question and deleted it twice", "if a professor passes me based on an oral exam without attending class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436)", "expressed clearly, multiple times, that (a) he is in agreement with everyone who", "he is in agreement with everyone who has tried to reassure him, but", "along with one of his deletions. I would like to recover this answer", "a professor passes me based on an oral exam without attending class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436) I", "about an academic issue. He has expressed clearly, multiple times, that (a) he", "to do this? I don't think my request would fit in the flag", "I wrote an answer which has disappeared along with one of his deletions.", "an answer which has disappeared along with one of his deletions. I would", "of me and can I get in trouble if a professor passes me", "and is acute. He states that he has posted his question and deleted", "I would like to recover this answer and repost it at his new", "trouble if a professor passes me based on an oral exam without attending", "up? (I'm not sure if \"thread\" is the correct word.) Or should I", "times, that (a) he is in agreement with everyone who has tried to", "the moderators merge his multiple threads, so my answer would show up? (I'm", "reassure him, but that (b) his anxiety persists and is acute. He states", "word.) Or should I just have flagged his question to try to do", "of his deletions. I would like to recover this answer and repost it", "like to recover this answer and repost it at his new question. Can", "just have flagged his question to try to do this? I don't think", "in agreement with everyone who has tried to reassure him, but that (b)", "oral exam without attending class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436) I wrote an answer which has disappeared along", "flagged his question to try to do this? I don't think my request", "question to try to do this? I don't think my request would fit", "sure if \"thread\" is the correct word.) Or should I just have flagged", "repost it at his new question. Can the moderators merge his multiple threads,", "deleted it twice and now here it is again for the third time:", "question and deleted it twice and now here it is again for the", "threads, so my answer would show up? (I'm not sure if \"thread\" is", "my answer would show up? (I'm not sure if \"thread\" is the correct", "third time: [Is it unethical of me and can I get in trouble", "answer would show up? (I'm not sure if \"thread\" is the correct word.)", "for the third time: [Is it unethical of me and can I get", "answer and repost it at his new question. Can the moderators merge his", "has posted his question and deleted it twice and now here it is", "not sure if \"thread\" is the correct word.) Or should I just have", "question. Can the moderators merge his multiple threads, so my answer would show", "is in agreement with everyone who has tried to reassure him, but that", "but that (b) his anxiety persists and is acute. He states that he", "the correct word.) Or should I just have flagged his question to try", "show up? (I'm not sure if \"thread\" is the correct word.) Or should", "one of his deletions. I would like to recover this answer and repost", "me based on an oral exam without attending class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436) I wrote an answer", "He states that he has posted his question and deleted it twice and", "disappeared along with one of his deletions. I would like to recover this", "posted his question and deleted it twice and now here it is again", "his anxiety persists and is acute. He states that he has posted his", "so my answer would show up? (I'm not sure if \"thread\" is the", "get in trouble if a professor passes me based on an oral exam", "professor passes me based on an oral exam without attending class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436) I wrote", "it is again for the third time: [Is it unethical of me and", "on an oral exam without attending class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436) I wrote an answer which has", "He has expressed clearly, multiple times, that (a) he is in agreement with", "unethical of me and can I get in trouble if a professor passes", "again for the third time: [Is it unethical of me and can I", "wrote an answer which has disappeared along with one of his deletions. I", "that (a) he is in agreement with everyone who has tried to reassure", "is acute. He states that he has posted his question and deleted it", "states that he has posted his question and deleted it twice and now", "here it is again for the third time: [Is it unethical of me", "it twice and now here it is again for the third time: [Is", "him, but that (b) his anxiety persists and is acute. He states that", "to try to do this? I don't think my request would fit in", "Can the moderators merge his multiple threads, so my answer would show up?", "anxiety persists and is acute. He states that he has posted his question", "has disappeared along with one of his deletions. I would like to recover", "based on an oral exam without attending class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436) I wrote an answer which", "an oral exam without attending class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436) I wrote an answer which has disappeared", "is the correct word.) Or should I just have flagged his question to", "try to do this? I don't think my request would fit in the", "experiencing high anxiety about an academic issue. He has expressed clearly, multiple times,", "this answer and repost it at his new question. Can the moderators merge", "would like to recover this answer and repost it at his new question.", "new question. Can the moderators merge his multiple threads, so my answer would", "his new question. Can the moderators merge his multiple threads, so my answer", "without attending class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436) I wrote an answer which has disappeared along with one", "and deleted it twice and now here it is again for the third", "deletions. I would like to recover this answer and repost it at his", "answer which has disappeared along with one of his deletions. I would like", "in trouble if a professor passes me based on an oral exam without", "moderators merge his multiple threads, so my answer would show up? (I'm not", "an academic issue. He has expressed clearly, multiple times, that (a) he is", "he has posted his question and deleted it twice and now here it", "his question to try to do this? I don't think my request would", "and now here it is again for the third time: [Is it unethical", "his deletions. I would like to recover this answer and repost it at", "it at his new question. Can the moderators merge his multiple threads, so", "is experiencing high anxiety about an academic issue. He has expressed clearly, multiple", "merge his multiple threads, so my answer would show up? (I'm not sure", "(a) he is in agreement with everyone who has tried to reassure him,", "tried to reassure him, but that (b) his anxiety persists and is acute.", "can I get in trouble if a professor passes me based on an", "everyone who has tried to reassure him, but that (b) his anxiety persists", "exam without attending class?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/32436) I wrote an answer which has disappeared along with", "agreement with everyone who has tried to reassure him, but that (b) his", "and repost it at his new question. Can the moderators merge his multiple", "multiple threads, so my answer would show up? (I'm not sure if \"thread\"", "with everyone who has tried to reassure him, but that (b) his anxiety", "I get in trouble if a professor passes me based on an oral", "clearly, multiple times, that (a) he is in agreement with everyone who has", "A user is experiencing high anxiety about an academic issue. He has expressed", "high anxiety about an academic issue. He has expressed clearly, multiple times, that" ]
[ "a number of answers to the effect of \"I think X, because Y\".", "of \"I think X, because Y\". While the reasons are good, they're really", "really individuals expressing their personal ethics, rather than being definitive. The tough part", "that said, my question is: should questions related to students cheating (where the", "should questions related to students cheating (where the answer isn't explicitly defined in", "question is: should questions related to students cheating (where the answer isn't explicitly", "few cheating-related questions lately ([this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/79732/73), [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/73), tangentially [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/73597/73)). Almost all of these end", "said, my question is: should questions related to students cheating (where the answer", "in these instances there often isn't a definitive answer. So, that said, my", "my question is: should questions related to students cheating (where the answer isn't", "yielding a number of answers to the effect of \"I think X, because", "answer isn't explicitly defined in their academic integrity policy) be closed as \"primarily", "Y\". While the reasons are good, they're really individuals expressing their personal ethics,", "tangentially [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/73597/73)). Almost all of these end up yielding a number of answers", "([this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/79732/73), [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/73), tangentially [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/73597/73)). Almost all of these end up yielding a number", "X, because Y\". While the reasons are good, they're really individuals expressing their", "effect of \"I think X, because Y\". While the reasons are good, they're", "ethics, rather than being definitive. The tough part is that they're not definitive", "tough part is that they're not definitive because in these instances there often", "definitive answer. So, that said, my question is: should questions related to students", "a definitive answer. So, that said, my question is: *should questions related to", "questions related to students cheating (where the answer isn't explicitly defined in their", "cheating-related questions lately ([this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/79732/73), [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/73), tangentially [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/73597/73)). Almost all of these end up", "instances there often isn't* a definitive answer. So, that said, my question is:", "individuals expressing their personal ethics, rather than being definitive. The tough part is", "definitive. The tough part is that they're not definitive because in these instances", "\"I think X, because Y\". While the reasons are good, they're really individuals", "there often isn't a definitive answer. So, that said, my question is: *should", "While the reasons are good, they're really individuals expressing their personal ethics, rather", "part is that they're not definitive because in these instances there often isn't", "they're really individuals expressing their personal ethics, rather than being definitive. The tough", "related to students cheating (where the answer isn't explicitly defined in their academic", "cheating (where the answer isn't explicitly defined in their academic integrity policy) be", "students cheating (where the answer isn't explicitly defined in their academic integrity policy)", "isn't* a definitive answer. So, that said, my question is: *should questions related", "The tough part is that they're not definitive because in these instances there", "the answer isn't explicitly defined in their academic integrity policy) be closed as", "up yielding a number of answers to the effect of \"I think X,", "that they're not definitive because in these instances there often isn't* a definitive", "these end up yielding a number of answers to the effect of \"I", "their personal ethics, rather than being definitive. The tough part is that they're", "rather than being definitive. The tough part is that they're not definitive because", "is that they're not definitive because in these instances there often isn't a", "being definitive. The tough part is that they're not definitive because in these", "definitive because in these instances there often isn't a definitive answer. So, that", "not definitive because in these instances there often isn't a definitive answer. So,", "answers to the effect of \"I think X, because Y\". While the reasons", "end up yielding a number of answers to the effect of \"I think", "they're not definitive because in these instances there often isn't a definitive answer.", "all of these end up yielding a number of answers to the effect", "personal ethics, rather than being definitive. The tough part is that they're not", "to the effect of \"I think X, because Y\". While the reasons are", "had a few cheating-related questions lately ([this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/79732/73), [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/73), tangentially [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/73597/73)). Almost all of", "are good, they're really individuals expressing their personal ethics, rather than being definitive.", "the effect of \"I think X, because Y\". While the reasons are good,", "(where the answer isn't explicitly defined in their academic integrity policy) be closed", "of these end up yielding a number of answers to the effect of", "than being definitive. The tough part is that they're not definitive because in", "So, that said, my question is: should questions related to students cheating (where", "is: should questions related to students cheating (where the answer isn't explicitly defined", "think X, because Y\". While the reasons are good, they're really individuals expressing", "often isn't a definitive answer. So, that said, my question is: should questions", "reasons are good, they're really individuals expressing their personal ethics, rather than being", "We've had a few cheating-related questions lately ([this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/79732/73), [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/73), tangentially [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/73597/73)). Almost all", "good, they're really individuals expressing their personal ethics, rather than being definitive. The", "a few cheating-related questions lately ([this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/79732/73), [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/73), tangentially [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/73597/73)). Almost all of these", "answer. So, that said, my question is: should questions related to students cheating", "lately ([this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/79732/73), [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/73), tangentially [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/73597/73)). Almost all of these end up yielding a", "these instances there often isn't a definitive answer. So, that said, my question", "because Y\". While the reasons are good, they're really individuals expressing their personal", "questions lately ([this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/79732/73), [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/73), tangentially [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/73597/73)). Almost all of these end up yielding", "number of answers to the effect of \"I think X, because Y\". While", "the reasons are good, they're really individuals expressing their personal ethics, rather than", "to students cheating (where the answer isn't explicitly defined in their academic integrity", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/78853/73), tangentially [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/73597/73)). Almost all of these end up yielding a number of", "Almost all of these end up yielding a number of answers to the", "isn't explicitly defined in their academic integrity policy) be closed as \"primarily opinion-based\"?*", "of answers to the effect of \"I think X, because Y\". While the", "because in these instances there often isn't* a definitive answer. So, that said,", "expressing their personal ethics, rather than being definitive. The tough part is that", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/73597/73)). Almost all of these end up yielding a number of answers to" ]
[ "Here's a specific example: I wrote an answer to this question: [How to", "student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565) The OP only included one tag. I can think of at least", "The OP only included one tag. I can think of at least one", "at least one more tag but I'm hesitating to add it. Since I", "Since I contributed an answer, maybe it might look as though I have", "included one tag. I can think of at least one more tag but", "it. Since I contributed an answer, maybe it might look as though I", "OP only included one tag. I can think of at least one more", "specific example: I wrote an answer to this question: [How to professionally handle", "this question: [How to professionally handle sexist remarks by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565) The OP", "can think of at least one more tag but I'm hesitating to add", "[How to professionally handle sexist remarks by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565) The OP only included", "professionally handle sexist remarks by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565) The OP only included one tag.", "to professionally handle sexist remarks by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565) The OP only included one", "to add it. Since I contributed an answer, maybe it might look as", "only included one tag. I can think of at least one more tag", "one tag. I can think of at least one more tag but I'm", "least one more tag but I'm hesitating to add it. Since I contributed", "one more tag but I'm hesitating to add it. Since I contributed an", "I contributed an answer, maybe it might look as though I have a", "of at least one more tag but I'm hesitating to add it. Since", "sexist remarks by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565) The OP only included one tag. I can", "think of at least one more tag but I'm hesitating to add it.", "a specific example: I wrote an answer to this question: [How to professionally", "but I'm hesitating to add it. Since I contributed an answer, maybe it", "a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565) The OP only included one tag. I can think of at", "answer to this question: [How to professionally handle sexist remarks by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565)", "add it. Since I contributed an answer, maybe it might look as though", "remarks by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565) The OP only included one tag. I can think", "by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565) The OP only included one tag. I can think of", "answer, maybe it might look as though I have a conflict of interest?", "I can think of at least one more tag but I'm hesitating to", "example: I wrote an answer to this question: [How to professionally handle sexist", "hesitating to add it. Since I contributed an answer, maybe it might look", "I wrote an answer to this question: [How to professionally handle sexist remarks", "tag but I'm hesitating to add it. Since I contributed an answer, maybe", "more tag but I'm hesitating to add it. Since I contributed an answer,", "wrote an answer to this question: [How to professionally handle sexist remarks by", "to this question: [How to professionally handle sexist remarks by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565) The", "question: [How to professionally handle sexist remarks by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565) The OP only", "handle sexist remarks by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80561/would-you-call-a-student-out-on-being-sexist/80565#80565) The OP only included one tag. I", "an answer, maybe it might look as though I have a conflict of", "contributed an answer, maybe it might look as though I have a conflict", "I'm hesitating to add it. Since I contributed an answer, maybe it might", "tag. I can think of at least one more tag but I'm hesitating", "an answer to this question: [How to professionally handle sexist remarks by a" ]
[ "possible ambiguity were even less favorably received. I don't really understand why. I", "that extent, how should we deal with these types of questions/situations in the", "the premises in the question was not the right way to go. (Quite", "favorably received. I don't really understand why. I think one should stick with", "extent, how should we deal with these types of questions/situations in the future?", "way to go. (Quite ironically ff524 was the first to question the premises", "question, edits to the question to remove possible ambiguity were even less favorably", "with answering the question, possibly pointing out a potential false positive, and not", "in assessing whether a given situation was possibly sexist or not. The reaction", "an [older, very similar question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643). That one was much better received, and the", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643). That one was much better received, and the [meta post about it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643)", "first question, edits to the question to remove possible ambiguity were even less", "first to question the premises in a comment, while she was the \"victim\"", "the question to remove possible ambiguity were even less favorably received. I don't", "The responses were overwhelmingly negative and focused on trying to prove that OP", "focused on trying to prove that OP is wrong in assessing whether a", "she was the \"victim\" of a similar treatment 2 years ago.) In the", "one was much better received, and the [meta post about it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643) also indicated", "go. (Quite ironically ff524 was the first to question the premises in a", "even less favorably received. I don't really understand why. I think one should", "understand why. I think one should stick with answering the question, possibly pointing", "post about it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643) also indicated questioning the premises in the question was not", "unreasonable. The responses were overwhelmingly negative and focused on trying to prove that", "ambiguity were even less favorably received. I don't really understand why. I think", "the [meta post about it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643) also indicated questioning the premises in the question", "not just questioning the premises. To that extent, how should we deal with", "was possibly sexist or not. The reaction was similar to what happened to", "[older, very similar question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643). That one was much better received, and the [meta", "To that extent, how should we deal with these types of questions/situations in", "(Quite ironically ff524 was the first to question the premises in a comment,", "edits to the question to remove possible ambiguity were even less favorably received.", "In the case of the first question, edits to the question to remove", "2 years ago.) In the case of the first question, edits to the", "about it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643) also indicated questioning the premises in the question was not the", "and not just questioning the premises. To that extent, how should we deal", "potential false positive, and not just questioning the premises. To that extent, how", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80561/10643) quite unreasonable. The responses were overwhelmingly negative and focused on trying to", "happened to an [older, very similar question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643). That one was much better received,", "quite unreasonable. The responses were overwhelmingly negative and focused on trying to prove", "the first question, edits to the question to remove possible ambiguity were even", "The reaction was similar to what happened to an [older, very similar question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643).", "is wrong in assessing whether a given situation was possibly sexist or not.", "situation was possibly sexist or not. The reaction was similar to what happened", "also indicated questioning the premises in the question was not the right way", "question to remove possible ambiguity were even less favorably received. I don't really", "received, and the [meta post about it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643) also indicated questioning the premises in", "reaction was similar to what happened to an [older, very similar question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643). That", "sexist or not. The reaction was similar to what happened to an [older,", "was similar to what happened to an [older, very similar question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643). That one", "to what happened to an [older, very similar question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643). That one was much", "indicated questioning the premises in the question was not the right way to", "to question the premises in a comment, while she was the \"victim\" of", "remove possible ambiguity were even less favorably received. I don't really understand why.", "comment, while she was the \"victim\" of a similar treatment 2 years ago.)", "reaction to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80561/10643) quite unreasonable. The responses were overwhelmingly negative and focused", "was not the right way to go. (Quite ironically ff524 was the first", "of the first question, edits to the question to remove possible ambiguity were", "really understand why. I think one should stick with answering the question, possibly", "the question was not the right way to go. (Quite ironically ff524 was", "premises. To that extent, how should we deal with these types of questions/situations", "question the premises in a comment, while she was the \"victim\" of a", "the premises. To that extent, how should we deal with these types of", "very similar question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643). That one was much better received, and the [meta post", "better received, and the [meta post about it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643) also indicated questioning the premises", "should stick with answering the question, possibly pointing out a potential false positive,", "answering the question, possibly pointing out a potential false positive, and not just", "positive, and not just questioning the premises. To that extent, how should we", "wrong in assessing whether a given situation was possibly sexist or not. The", "a similar treatment 2 years ago.) In the case of the first question,", "or not. The reaction was similar to what happened to an [older, very", "similar question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643). That one was much better received, and the [meta post about", "why. I think one should stick with answering the question, possibly pointing out", "not the right way to go. (Quite ironically ff524 was the first to", "just questioning the premises. To that extent, how should we deal with these", "trying to prove that OP is wrong in assessing whether a given situation", "was much better received, and the [meta post about it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643) also indicated questioning", "stick with answering the question, possibly pointing out a potential false positive, and", "responses were overwhelmingly negative and focused on trying to prove that OP is", "question was not the right way to go. (Quite ironically ff524 was the", "and the [meta post about it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643) also indicated questioning the premises in the", "[meta post about it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643) also indicated questioning the premises in the question was", "ironically ff524 was the first to question the premises in a comment, while", "to an [older, very similar question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643). That one was much better received, and", "find the reaction to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80561/10643) quite unreasonable. The responses were overwhelmingly negative", "premises in the question was not the right way to go. (Quite ironically", "to go. (Quite ironically ff524 was the first to question the premises in", "assessing whether a given situation was possibly sexist or not. The reaction was", "questioning the premises. To that extent, how should we deal with these types", "of a similar treatment 2 years ago.) In the case of the first", "it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643) also indicated questioning the premises in the question was not the right", "what happened to an [older, very similar question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643). That one was much better", "similar treatment 2 years ago.) In the case of the first question, edits", "that OP is wrong in assessing whether a given situation was possibly sexist", "out a potential false positive, and not just questioning the premises. To that", "overwhelmingly negative and focused on trying to prove that OP is wrong in", "false positive, and not just questioning the premises. To that extent, **how should", "the question, possibly pointing out a potential false positive, and not just questioning", "on trying to prove that OP is wrong in assessing whether a given", "\"victim\" of a similar treatment 2 years ago.) In the case of the", "questioning the premises in the question was not the right way to go.", "ago.) In the case of the first question, edits to the question to", "to the question to remove possible ambiguity were even less favorably received. I", "to remove possible ambiguity were even less favorably received. I don't really understand", "in a comment, while she was the \"victim\" of a similar treatment 2", "premises in a comment, while she was the \"victim\" of a similar treatment", "a potential false positive, and not just questioning the premises. To that extent,", "the right way to go. (Quite ironically ff524 was the first to question", "don't really understand why. I think one should stick with answering the question,", "ff524 was the first to question the premises in a comment, while she", "a comment, while she was the \"victim\" of a similar treatment 2 years", "I don't really understand why. I think one should stick with answering the", "received. I don't really understand why. I think one should stick with answering", "pointing out a potential false positive, and not just questioning the premises. To", "to prove that OP is wrong in assessing whether a given situation was", "I find the reaction to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80561/10643) quite unreasonable. The responses were overwhelmingly", "while she was the \"victim\" of a similar treatment 2 years ago.) In", "to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80561/10643) quite unreasonable. The responses were overwhelmingly negative and focused on", "the case of the first question, edits to the question to remove possible", "question, possibly pointing out a potential false positive, and not just questioning the", "not. The reaction was similar to what happened to an [older, very similar", "one should stick with answering the question, possibly pointing out a potential false", "the premises in a comment, while she was the \"victim\" of a similar", "years ago.) In the case of the first question, edits to the question", "case of the first question, edits to the question to remove possible ambiguity", "possibly pointing out a potential false positive, and not just questioning the premises.", "the first to question the premises in a comment, while she was the", "was the first to question the premises in a comment, while she was", "negative and focused on trying to prove that OP is wrong in assessing", "less favorably received. I don't really understand why. I think one should stick", "OP is wrong in assessing whether a given situation was possibly sexist or", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80561/10643) quite unreasonable. The responses were overwhelmingly negative and focused on trying", "think one should stick with answering the question, possibly pointing out a potential", "the reaction to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80561/10643) quite unreasonable. The responses were overwhelmingly negative and", "treatment 2 years ago.) In the case of the first question, edits to", "much better received, and the [meta post about it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643) also indicated questioning the", "I think one should stick with answering the question, possibly pointing out a", "were overwhelmingly negative and focused on trying to prove that OP is wrong", "prove that OP is wrong in assessing whether a given situation was possibly", "was the \"victim\" of a similar treatment 2 years ago.) In the case", "whether a given situation was possibly sexist or not. The reaction was similar", "in the question was not the right way to go. (Quite ironically ff524", "a given situation was possibly sexist or not. The reaction was similar to", "similar to what happened to an [older, very similar question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17739/10643). That one was", "right way to go. (Quite ironically ff524 was the first to question the", "were even less favorably received. I don't really understand why. I think one", "That one was much better received, and the [meta post about it](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/834/10643) also", "possibly sexist or not. The reaction was similar to what happened to an", "and focused on trying to prove that OP is wrong in assessing whether", "given situation was possibly sexist or not. The reaction was similar to what", "the \"victim\" of a similar treatment 2 years ago.) In the case of" ]
[ "profile means you won't see any hat at all - not on your", "design, for example) * After the promotion ends, the hats disappear, as if", "a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats", "in a leaderboard that looks something like this: ![Cultep Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack Exchange", "never there. --- This being said, we (as a community) also have to", "* Apart from the wearing of hats by avatars, the site is otherwise", "Stack Exchange (no hats for anyone). In [2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom) and [2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion), we chose to", "2016, Stack Exchange will continue its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://winterbash2016.stackexchange.com). Cultep Besh", "anyone). In [2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom) and [2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion), we chose to participate. To decide whether we", "amazing people who make the sites awesome, as the year draws to a", "any Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for their", "can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard that looks", "“holiday” theme of the site's design, for example) * After the promotion ends,", "other user's). * Apart from the wearing of hats by avatars, the site", "Upvote one of the comments according to your preference. If you want to", "the comments according to your preference. If you want to discuss further, leave", "can opt out (clicking an option in your profile means you won't see", "who make the sites awesome, as the year draws to a close. Two", "from the wearing of hats by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there", "have to choice to opt out entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely", "ends, the hats disappear, as if they were never there. --- This being", "Edition, I've created a “poll” below this post, with two comments. *Upvote one", "a leaderboard that looks something like this: ![Cultep Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack Exchange sees", "the year draws to a close. Two things to note: Any user", "that looks something like this: ![Cultep Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh", "user can opt out (clicking an option in your profile means you won't", "to participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous", "--- This being said, we (as a community) also have to choice to", "disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (no hats for anyone). In [2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom) and [2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion),", "according to your preference. If you want to discuss further, leave an answer", "Academia Stack Exchange (no hats for anyone). In [2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom) and [2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion), we chose", "opt out (clicking an option in your profile means you won't see any", "own avatar and not on any other user's). * Apart from the wearing", "make the sites awesome, as the year draws to a close. Two things", "see any hat at all - not on your own avatar and not", "to celebrate the amazing people who make the sites awesome, as the year", "tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving a hat, which", "hat at all - not on your own avatar and not on any", "[\"Cultep Besh\"](http://winterbash2016.stackexchange.com). Cultep Besh is an annual event that can run on any", "hats in a leaderboard that looks something like this: ![Cultep Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack", "on any other user's). * Apart from the wearing of hats by avatars,", "To decide whether we will participate in the Cultep Besh 2016 Edition, I've", "Besh 2016 Edition, I've created a “poll” below this post, with two comments.", "further, leave an answer or comments to other answers. The poll will close", "as a a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing people who", "to your preference. If you want to discuss further, leave an answer or", "user's). * Apart from the wearing of hats by avatars, the site is", "gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard that", "unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of the site's design, for example) ", "as the year draws to a close. Two things to note: Any", "out (clicking an option in your profile means you won't see any hat", "below this post, with two comments. Upvote one of the comments according to", "you won't see any hat at all - not on your own avatar", "example) * After the promotion ends, the hats disappear, as if they were", "[2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom) and [2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion), we chose to participate. To decide whether we will participate", "Cultep Besh 2016 Edition, I've created a “poll” below this post, with two", "site is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of the site's design,", "Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (no hats for anyone). In", "any hat at all - not on your own avatar and not on", "Cultep Besh as a a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing", "earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain", "their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the", "and [2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion), we chose to participate. To decide whether we will participate in", "disappear, as if they were never there. --- This being said, we (as", "Besh\"](http://winterbash2016.stackexchange.com). Cultep Besh is an annual event that can run on any Stack", "event that can run on any Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate.", "can run on any Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users earn", "leaderboard that looks something like this: ![Cultep Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack Exchange sees Cultep", "things to note: * Any user can opt out (clicking an option in", "as if they were never there. --- This being said, we (as a", "(no hats for anyone). In [2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom) and [2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion), we chose to participate. To", "the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (no hats for anyone).", "After the promotion ends, the hats disappear, as if they were never there.", "celebrate the amazing people who make the sites awesome, as the year draws", "run on any Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats”", "an annual event that can run on any Stack Exchange site that chooses", "out entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange", "close. Two things to note: * Any user can opt out (clicking an", "on any Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for", "tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://winterbash2016.stackexchange.com). Cultep Besh is an annual event that can", "“poll” below this post, with two comments. Upvote one of the comments according", "the amazing people who make the sites awesome, as the year draws to", "entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (no", "opt out entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack", "wearing of hats by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there is no", "and not on any other user's). * Apart from the wearing of hats", "the user receiving a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s", "means you won't see any hat at all - not on your own", "- not on your own avatar and not on any other user's). ", "of the site's design, for example) After the promotion ends, the hats", "choice to opt out entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on", "want to discuss further, leave an answer or comments to other answers. The", "“hats” for their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions", "hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats in", "whether we will participate in the Cultep Besh 2016 Edition, I've created a", "promotion ends, the hats disappear, as if they were never there. --- This", "like this: ![Cultep Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a", "Certain actions trigger the user receiving a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”.", "for anyone). In [2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom) and [2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion), we chose to participate. To decide whether", "with two comments. Upvote one of the comments according to your preference. If", "comments according to your preference. If you want to discuss further, leave an", "Exchange (no hats for anyone). In [2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom) and [2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion), we chose to participate.", "something like this: ![Cultep Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a", "for example) * After the promotion ends, the hats disappear, as if they", "your preference. If you want to discuss further, leave an answer or comments", "Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (no hats for anyone). In [2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom)", "looks something like this: ![Cultep Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as", "of hats by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday”", "preference. If you want to discuss further, leave an answer or comments to", "a a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing people who make", "sites awesome, as the year draws to a close. Two things to note:", "your profile means you won't see any hat at all - not on", "draws to a close. Two things to note: * Any user can opt", "the promotion ends, the hats disappear, as if they were never there. ---", "in the Cultep Besh 2016 Edition, I've created a “poll” below this post,", "a “poll” below this post, with two comments. *Upvote one of the comments", "their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard", "any other user's). Apart from the wearing of hats by avatars, the", "* Any user can opt out (clicking an option in your profile means", "if they were never there. --- This being said, we (as a community)", "its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://winterbash2016.stackexchange.com). Cultep Besh is an annual event that", "earning hats in a leaderboard that looks something like this: ![Cultep Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg)", "people who make the sites awesome, as the year draws to a close.", "will participate in the Cultep Besh 2016 Edition, I've created a “poll” below", "community) also have to choice to opt out entirely and have the Cultep", "one of the comments according to your preference. If you want to discuss", "This being said, we (as a community) also have to choice to opt", "Stack Exchange will continue its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://winterbash2016.stackexchange.com). Cultep Besh is", "and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (no hats", "In [2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom) and [2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion), we chose to participate. To decide whether we will", "to note: * Any user can opt out (clicking an option in your", "discuss further, leave an answer or comments to other answers. The poll will", "they were never there. --- This being said, we (as a community) also", "trigger the user receiving a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We track", "or comments to other answers. The poll will close on Friday December 9.", "not on any other user's). * Apart from the wearing of hats by", "were never there. --- This being said, we (as a community) also have", "avatar and not on any other user's). * Apart from the wearing of", "won't see any hat at all - not on your own avatar and", "this post, with two comments. Upvote one of the comments according to your", "In 2016, Stack Exchange will continue its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://winterbash2016.stackexchange.com). Cultep", "actions trigger the user receiving a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We", "we (as a community) also have to choice to opt out entirely and", "decide whether we will participate in the Cultep Besh 2016 Edition, *I've created", "If you want to discuss further, leave an answer or comments to other", "to choice to opt out entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled", "awesome, as the year draws to a close. Two things to note: ", "Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate", "participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to", "we will participate in the Cultep Besh 2016 Edition, *I've created a “poll”", "have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (no hats for", "badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving a hat, which their gravatar can", "that can run on any Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users", "theme of the site's design, for example) After the promotion ends, the", "also have to choice to opt out entirely and have the Cultep Besh", "created a “poll” below this post, with two comments. Upvote one of the", "completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving a", "way to celebrate the amazing people who make the sites awesome, as the", "(there is no “holiday” theme of the site's design, for example) * After", "(analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving a hat, which their", "comments. Upvote one of the comments according to your preference. If you want", "a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing people who make the", "site's design, for example) * After the promotion ends, the hats disappear, as", "by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving", "a community) also have to choice to opt out entirely and have the", "avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of the", "we chose to participate. To decide whether we will participate in the Cultep", "Besh is an annual event that can run on any Stack Exchange site", "Any user can opt out (clicking an option in your profile means you", "which their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats in a", "not on your own avatar and not on any other user's). * Apart", "a close. Two things to note: * Any user can opt out (clicking", "of the comments according to your preference.** If you want to discuss further,", "year draws to a close. Two things to note: * *Any user can", "on Academia Stack Exchange (no hats for anyone). In [2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom) and [2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion), we", "Exchange will continue its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://winterbash2016.stackexchange.com). Cultep Besh is an", "track everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard that looks something like this:", "being said, we (as a community) also have to choice to opt out", "to badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving a hat, which their gravatar", "Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a fun and lighthearted way to", " After the promotion ends, the hats disappear, as if they were never", "to opt out entirely and have the Cultep Besh completely disabled on Academia", "on your own avatar and not on any other user's). * Apart from", "that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing certain", "sees Cultep Besh as a a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the", "chose to participate. To decide whether we will participate in the Cultep Besh", "hats disappear, as if they were never there. --- This being said, we", "note: * Any user can opt out (clicking an option in your profile", "the site's design, for example) * After the promotion ends, the hats disappear,", "two comments. Upvote one of the comments according to your preference. If you", "is no “holiday” theme of the site's design, for example) * After the", "I've created a “poll” below this post, with two comments. *Upvote one of", "by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of", "annual event that can run on any Stack Exchange site that chooses to", "all - not on your own avatar and not on any other user's).", "said, we (as a community) also have to choice to opt out entirely", "otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of the site's design, for example)", "the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://winterbash2016.stackexchange.com). Cultep Besh is an annual event that can run on", "site that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing", "“wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard that looks something", "progress earning hats in a leaderboard that looks something like this: ![Cultep Besh", "the site is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of the site's", "(clicking an option in your profile means you won't see any* hat at", "gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the user", "(as a community) also have to choice to opt out entirely and have", "participate in the Cultep Besh 2016 Edition, *I've created a “poll” below this", "Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges).", "for their gravatars by completing certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger", "continue its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://winterbash2016.stackexchange.com). Cultep Besh is an annual event", "hats for anyone). In [2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom) and [2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion), we chose to participate. To decide", "Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by", "option in your profile means you won't see any* hat at all -", "you want to discuss further, leave an answer or comments to other answers.", "user receiving a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress", "everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard that looks something like this: ![Cultep", "is an annual event that can run on any Stack Exchange site that", "the hats disappear, as if they were never there. --- This being said,", "the wearing of hats by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there is", "the sites awesome, as the year draws to a close. Two things to", "Two things to note: * Any user can opt out (clicking an option", "to a close. Two things to note: * Any user can opt out", "at all - not on your own avatar and not on any other", "Stack Exchange site that chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars", "of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://winterbash2016.stackexchange.com). Cultep Besh is an annual event that can run", "2016 Edition, I've created a “poll” below this post, with two comments. Upvote", "and lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing people who make the sites awesome,", "[2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2082/poll-should-we-participate-in-the-2015-winter-bash-holiday-hats-promotion), we chose to participate. To decide whether we will participate in the", "Cultep Besh is an annual event that can run on any Stack Exchange", "the Cultep Besh 2016 Edition, I've created a “poll” below this post*, with", "fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing people who make the sites", "participate. To decide whether we will participate in the Cultep Besh 2016 Edition,", "lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing people who make the sites awesome, as", "is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme of the site's design, for", "screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a fun and lighthearted way", "there. --- This being said, we (as a community) also have to choice", "to discuss further, leave an answer or comments to other answers. The poll", "receiving a hat, which their gravatar can “wear”. We track everyone’s progress earning", "Besh as a a fun and lighthearted way to celebrate the amazing people", "an option in your profile means you won't see any* hat at all", "Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a fun and lighthearted", "leave an answer or comments to other answers. The poll will close on", "an answer or comments to other answers. The poll will close on Friday", "hats by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected (there is no “holiday” theme", "no “holiday” theme of the site's design, for example) * After the promotion", "We track everyone’s progress earning hats in a leaderboard that looks something like", "![Cultep Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a fun and", "in your profile means you won't see any hat at all - not", "chooses to participate. Users earn “hats” for their gravatars by completing certain tasks", "Apart from the wearing of hats by avatars, the site is otherwise unaffected", "completely disabled on Academia Stack Exchange (no hats for anyone). In [2014](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1369/poll-should-academia-se-participate-in-the-2014-winter-bash-holiday-hats-prom) and", "certain tasks (analogous to badges). Certain actions trigger the user receiving a hat,", "to participate. To decide whether we will participate in the Cultep Besh 2016", "answer or comments to other answers. The poll will close on Friday December", "this: ![Cultep Besh screenshot](https://i.stack.imgur.com/xPJDO.jpg) Stack Exchange sees Cultep Besh as a a fun", "your own avatar and not on any other user's). * Apart from the", "post, with two comments. Upvote one of the comments according to your preference.**", "will continue its tradition of the [\"Cultep Besh\"](http://winterbash2016.stackexchange.com). Cultep Besh is an annual" ]
[ "1. OP has been increasingly argumentative. OP has posted a question on Academia", "to copy it before I flagged it, and it has now been removed.", "OP but for simplicity I will use he. Here are the red flags", "have shared, he is free to take them on board or ignore them.", "he has only just cranked up the volume. As an example, OP wrote", "information, or new logical points, he has only just cranked up the volume.", "up. But that's not what motivates my Meta question. Rather, I am writing", "adding scattered additional information about the original question through multiple comment threads. Although", "But that's not what motivates my Meta question. Rather, I am writing because", "don't know the gender of OP but for simplicity I will use he.", "Regarding: [Am I being a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a take", "copy it before I flagged it, and it has now been removed. Currently", "my Meta question. Rather, I am writing because I see several red flags", "I being a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam)", "flagged it, and it has now been removed. Currently visible example: \"this answer", "it before I flagged it, and it has now been removed. Currently visible", "to just pass the standard exams... I've even heard they give mult choice", "his other classes as 'a joke;'\" \"I know the school and I can", "exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam) Discussion has been extensive and the tone has been ramping up. But", "to his other classes as 'a joke;'\" \"I know the school and I", "other classes as 'a joke;'\" \"I know the school and I can confirm", "the analysis and opinions other users have shared, he is free to take", "which clearly stated he wasn't interested in other users' opinions. I'm afraid I", "has added no documented or documentable information, or new logical points, he has", "add it to the question, either by incorporating it into the text of", "who is under age? How can we make clear that provocateur-like behavior is", "age. (To be clear: I am NOT saying that personally identifiable information about", "the question, or by creating an addendum at the bottom of the question.", "extensive and the tone has been ramping up. But that's not what motivates", "the volume. As an example, OP wrote a comment in response to the", "best case scenario is to include all relevant information in the original question,", "is baiting SE participants and attacking an individual, who is under age? How", "joke;'\" \"I know the school and I can confirm that it is an", "case, where an OP is baiting SE participants and attacking an individual, who", "comment, because I neglected to copy it before I flagged it, and it", "is just trying to demonize me.\" 2. *OP has been hypercritical of one", "posted a question on Academia SE. If he is not happy with the", "has been ramping up. But that's not what motivates my Meta question. Rather,", "under age. (To be clear: I am NOT* saying that personally identifiable information", "and it has now been removed. Currently visible example: \"this answer is just", "denying an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam) Discussion has been extensive and", "Although the best case scenario is to include all relevant information in the", "is accomplished by arguing, around and around. When he has disagreed with someone,", "the bottom of the question. More and more disorganized diatribe about the student", "the gender of OP but for simplicity I will use he. Here are", "demonize me.\" 2. OP has been hypercritical of one of his students, which", "new logical points, he has only just cranked up the volume. As an", "which is tangential to his question. This has gotten now to the point", "been gradually adding scattered additional information about the original question through multiple comment", "documented or documentable information, or new logical points, he has only just cranked", "gotten now to the point of a personal attack on an individual student,", "argumentative. OP has posted a question on Academia SE. If he is not", "answer by Mayou36 which clearly stated he wasn't interested in other users' opinions.", "OP has been gradually adding scattered additional information about the original question through", "comments. Then OP should add it to the question, either by incorporating it", "he is free to take them on board or ignore them. Nothing is", "I see several red flags suggesting the OP is behaving like a provocateur.", "it to the question, either by incorporating it into the text of the", "it, and it has now been removed. Currently visible example: \"this answer is", "his students, which is tangential to his question. This has gotten now to", "know the school and I can confirm that it is an inner city", "Discussion has been extensive and the tone has been ramping up. But that's", "am writing because I see several red flags suggesting the OP is behaving", "arguing, around and around. When he has disagreed with someone, he has added", "99% to just pass the standard exams... I've even heard they give mult", "before I flagged it, and it has now been removed. Currently visible example:", "has been gradually adding scattered additional information about the original question through multiple", "has been increasingly argumentative. OP has posted a question on Academia SE. If", "increasingly argumentative. OP has posted a question on Academia SE. If he is", "is under age. (To be clear: I am NOT saying that personally identifiable", "around and around. When he has disagreed with someone, he has added no", "either by incorporating it into the text of the question, or by creating", "been increasingly argumentative. OP has posted a question on Academia SE. If he", "sometimes elicited through comments. Then OP should add it to the question, either", "the student keeps getting added here and there and everywhere. Examples: \"The student", "done in such a case, where an OP is baiting SE participants and", "As an example, OP wrote a comment in response to the answer by", "are the red flags I see: 1. OP has been increasingly argumentative. OP", "to the question, either by incorporating it into the text of the question,", "his question. This has gotten now to the point of a personal attack", "identifiable information about the student has been revealed.) 3. *OP's \"case\" against the", "gradually adding scattered additional information about the original question through multiple comment threads.", "a question on Academia SE. If he is not happy with the analysis", "has now been removed. Currently visible example: \"this answer is just trying to", "pass the standard exams... I've even heard they give mult choice tests where", "If he is not happy with the analysis and opinions other users have", "on Academia SE. If he is not happy with the analysis and opinions", "that more is sometimes elicited through comments. Then OP should add it to", "I will use he. Here are the red flags I see: 1. OP", "take them on board or ignore them. Nothing is accomplished by arguing, around", "even heard they give mult choice tests where the answer is always the", "(To be clear: I am NOT* saying that personally identifiable information about the", "motivates my Meta question. Rather, I am writing because I see several red", "take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam) Discussion has been extensive and the tone has been ramping", "question, either by incorporating it into the text of the question, or by", "getting added here and there and everywhere. Examples: \"The student did refer to", "original question through multiple comment threads. Although the best case scenario is to", "of OP but for simplicity I will use he. Here are the red", "use he. Here are the red flags I see: 1. OP has been", "is sometimes elicited through comments. Then OP should add it to the question,", "board or ignore them. Nothing is accomplished by arguing, around and around. When", "individual, who is under age? How can we make clear that provocateur-like behavior", "or documentable information, or new logical points, he has only just cranked up", "home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam) Discussion has been extensive and the tone has been ramping up.", "been hypercritical of one of his students, which is tangential to his question.", "it has now been removed. Currently visible example: \"this answer is just trying", "only just cranked up the volume. As an example, OP wrote a comment", "is to include all relevant information in the original question, I appreciate that", "just pass the standard exams... I've even heard they give mult choice tests", "other users have shared, he is free to take them on board or", "like a provocateur. I don't know the gender of OP but for simplicity", "instructor, denying an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam) Discussion has been extensive", "SE. If he is not happy with the analysis and opinions other users", "neglected to copy it before I flagged it, and it has now been", "clear: I am NOT saying that personally identifiable information about the student has", "opinions. I'm afraid I can't quote the comment, because I neglected to copy", "has only just cranked up the volume. As an example, OP wrote a", "because I neglected to copy it before I flagged it, and it has", "\"case\" against the student keeps growing, ad infinitum.** The OP has been gradually", "example, OP wrote a comment in response to the answer by Mayou36 which", "simplicity I will use he. Here are the red flags I see: 1.", "elicited through comments. Then OP should add it to the question, either by", "a case, where an OP is baiting SE participants and attacking an individual,", "to the answer by Mayou36 which clearly stated he wasn't interested in other", "about the original question through multiple comment threads. Although the best case scenario", "of a personal attack on an individual student, who is under age. (To", "as 'a joke;'\" \"I know the school and I can confirm that it", "to the point of a personal attack on an individual student, who is", "the student keeps growing, ad infinitum. The OP has been gradually adding scattered", "he has added no documented or documentable information, or new logical points, he", "OP wrote a comment in response to the answer by Mayou36 which clearly", "visible example: \"this answer is just trying to demonize me.\" 2. OP has", "more is sometimes elicited through comments. Then OP should add it to the", "confirm that it is an inner city school with extremely low standards and", "information in the original question, I appreciate that more is sometimes elicited through", "the original question, I appreciate that more is sometimes elicited through comments. Then", "here and there and everywhere. Examples: \"The student did refer to his other", "keeps growing, ad infinitum.** The OP has been gradually adding scattered additional information", "but for simplicity I will use he. Here are the red flags I", "by creating an addendum at the bottom of the question. More and more", "city school with extremely low standards and they teach 99% to just pass", "quote the comment, because I neglected to copy it before I flagged it,", "has been extensive and the tone has been ramping up. But that's not", "I can confirm that it is an inner city school with extremely low", "against the student keeps growing, ad infinitum.** The OP has been gradually adding", "I am writing because I see several red flags suggesting the OP is", "will use he. Here are the red flags I see: 1. OP has", "I don't know the gender of OP but for simplicity I will use", "did refer to his other classes as 'a joke;'\" \"I know the school", "\"this answer is just trying to demonize me.\" 2. OP has been hypercritical", "is an inner city school with extremely low standards and they teach 99%", "and everywhere. Examples: \"The student did refer to his other classes as 'a", "participants and attacking an individual, who is under age? How can we make", "accomplished by arguing, around and around. When he has disagreed with someone, he", "everywhere. Examples: \"The student did refer to his other classes as 'a joke;'\"", "response.\" My question: what can be done in such a case, where an", "wrote a comment in response to the answer by Mayou36 which clearly stated", "documentable information, or new logical points, he has only just cranked up the", "I appreciate that more is sometimes elicited through comments. Then OP should add", "and the tone has been ramping up. But that's not what motivates my", "Nothing is accomplished by arguing, around and around. When he has disagreed with", "individual student, who is under age. (To be clear: I am NOT saying", "they teach 99% to just pass the standard exams... I've even heard they", "the original question through multiple comment threads. Although the best case scenario is", "school and I can confirm that it is an inner city school with", "to take them on board or ignore them. Nothing is accomplished by arguing,", "2. OP has been hypercritical of one of his students, which is tangential", "analysis and opinions other users have shared, he is free to take them", "cranked up the volume. As an example, OP wrote a comment in response", "standard exams... I've even heard they give mult choice tests where the answer", "personally identifiable information about the student has been revealed.) 3. OP's \"case\" against", "there and everywhere. Examples: \"The student did refer to his other classes as", "OP is behaving like a provocateur. I don't know the gender of OP", "question. This has gotten now to the point of a personal attack on", "give mult choice tests where the answer is always the longest response.\" My", "\"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam) Discussion has been", "that it is an inner city school with extremely low standards and they", "removed. Currently visible example: \"this answer is just trying to demonize me.\" 2.", "by arguing, around and around. When he has disagreed with someone, he has", "has been hypercritical of one of his students, which is tangential to his", "I see: 1. OP has been increasingly argumentative. OP has posted a question", "hypercritical of one of his students, which is tangential to his question. This", "tangential to his question. This has gotten now to the point of a", "OP has been increasingly argumentative. OP has posted a question on Academia SE.", "them. Nothing is accomplished by arguing, around and around. When he has disagreed", "example: \"this answer is just trying to demonize me.\" 2. OP has been", "suggesting the OP is behaving like a provocateur. I don't know the gender", "flags I see: 1. OP has been increasingly argumentative. OP has posted a", "is tangential to his question. This has gotten now to the point of", "tone has been ramping up. But that's not what motivates my Meta question.", "the student has been revealed.) 3. OP's \"case\" against the student keeps growing,", "question, I appreciate that more is sometimes elicited through comments. Then OP should", "under age? How can we make clear that provocateur-like behavior is unacceptable on", "afraid I can't quote the comment, because I neglected to copy it before", "the answer by Mayou36 which clearly stated he wasn't interested in other users'", "at the bottom of the question. More and more disorganized diatribe about the", "about the student has been revealed.) 3. *OP's \"case\" against the student keeps", "question. Rather, I am writing because I see several red flags suggesting the", "ad infinitum.* The OP has been gradually adding scattered additional information about the", "been extensive and the tone has been ramping up. But that's not what", "disagreed with someone, he has added no documented or documentable information, or new", "More and more disorganized diatribe about the student keeps getting added here and", "an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam) Discussion has been extensive and the", "to his question. This has gotten now to the point of a personal", "an OP is baiting SE participants and attacking an individual, who is under", "scenario is to include all relevant information in the original question, I appreciate", "trying to demonize me.\" 2. OP has been hypercritical of one of his", "that's not what motivates my Meta question. Rather, I am writing because I", "the longest response.\" My question: what can be done in such a case,", "\"I know the school and I can confirm that it is an inner", "question on Academia SE. If he is not happy with the analysis and", "all relevant information in the original question, I appreciate that more is sometimes", "should add it to the question, either by incorporating it into the text", "\"The student did refer to his other classes as 'a joke;'\" \"I know", "I neglected to copy it before I flagged it, and it has now", "teach 99% to just pass the standard exams... I've even heard they give", "an inner city school with extremely low standards and they teach 99% to", "interested in other users' opinions. I'm afraid I can't quote the comment, because", "not happy with the analysis and opinions other users have shared, he is", "gender of OP but for simplicity I will use he. Here are the", "students, which is tangential to his question. This has gotten now to the", "low standards and they teach 99% to just pass the standard exams... I've", "OP has been hypercritical of one of his students, which is tangential to", "information about the original question through multiple comment threads. Although the best case", "now to the point of a personal attack on an individual student, who", "answer is just trying to demonize me.\" 2. OP has been hypercritical of", "always the longest response.\" My question: what can be done in such a", "the question, either by incorporating it into the text of the question, or", "about the student keeps getting added here and there and everywhere. Examples: \"The", "addendum at the bottom of the question. More and more disorganized diatribe about", "an example, OP wrote a comment in response to the answer by Mayou36", "comment in response to the answer by Mayou36 which clearly stated he wasn't", "such a case, where an OP is baiting SE participants and attacking an", "Rather, I am writing because I see several red flags suggesting the OP", "in the original question, I appreciate that more is sometimes elicited through comments.", "users' opinions. I'm afraid I can't quote the comment, because I neglected to", "the best case scenario is to include all relevant information in the original", "just cranked up the volume. As an example, OP wrote a comment in", "SE participants and attacking an individual, who is under age? How can we", "saying that personally identifiable information about the student has been revealed.) 3. OP's", "stated he wasn't interested in other users' opinions. I'm afraid I can't quote", "extremely low standards and they teach 99% to just pass the standard exams...", "attacking an individual, who is under age? How can we make clear that", "free to take them on board or ignore them. Nothing is accomplished by", "been ramping up. But that's not what motivates my Meta question. Rather, I", "'a joke;'\" \"I know the school and I can confirm that it is", "I can't quote the comment, because I neglected to copy it before I", "several red flags suggesting the OP is behaving like a provocateur. I don't", "not what motivates my Meta question. Rather, I am writing because I see", "an addendum at the bottom of the question. More and more disorganized diatribe", "of his students, which is tangential to his question. This has gotten now", "opinions other users have shared, he is free to take them on board", "age? How can we make clear that provocateur-like behavior is unacceptable on Academia", "someone, he has added no documented or documentable information, or new logical points,", "is always the longest response.\" My question: what can be done in such", "with the analysis and opinions other users have shared, he is free to", "disorganized diatribe about the student keeps getting added here and there and everywhere.", "additional information about the original question through multiple comment threads. Although the best", "in other users' opinions. I'm afraid I can't quote the comment, because I", "text of the question, or by creating an addendum at the bottom of", "I've even heard they give mult choice tests where the answer is always", "users have shared, he is free to take them on board or ignore", "on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam) Discussion has been extensive and the tone has", "school with extremely low standards and they teach 99% to just pass the", "revealed.) 3. OP's \"case\" against the student keeps growing, ad infinitum. The OP", "flags suggesting the OP is behaving like a provocateur. I don't know the", "because I see several red flags suggesting the OP is behaving like a", "exams... I've even heard they give mult choice tests where the answer is", "see: 1. OP has been increasingly argumentative. OP has posted a question on", "Currently visible example: \"this answer is just trying to demonize me.\" 2. OP", "a comment in response to the answer by Mayou36 which clearly stated he", "can confirm that it is an inner city school with extremely low standards", "incorporating it into the text of the question, or by creating an addendum", "he has disagreed with someone, he has added no documented or documentable information,", "answer is always the longest response.\" My question: what can be done in", "diatribe about the student keeps getting added here and there and everywhere. Examples:", "student keeps growing, ad infinitum. The OP has been gradually adding scattered additional", "is under age? How can we make clear that provocateur-like behavior is unacceptable", "has disagreed with someone, he has added no documented or documentable information, or", "has posted a question on Academia SE. If he is not happy with", "the tone has been ramping up. But that's not what motivates my Meta", "tests where the answer is always the longest response.\" My question: what can", "inner city school with extremely low standards and they teach 99% to just", "red flags suggesting the OP is behaving like a provocateur. I don't know", "question through multiple comment threads. Although the best case scenario is to include", "and more disorganized diatribe about the student keeps getting added here and there", "scattered additional information about the original question through multiple comment threads. Although the", "I flagged it, and it has now been removed. Currently visible example: \"this", "[Am I being a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a take home", "no documented or documentable information, or new logical points, he has only just", "to include all relevant information in the original question, I appreciate that more", "Mayou36 which clearly stated he wasn't interested in other users' opinions. I'm afraid", "is not happy with the analysis and opinions other users have shared, he", "OP should add it to the question, either by incorporating it into the", "red flags I see: 1. OP has been increasingly argumentative. OP has posted", "a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam) Discussion has", "a provocateur. I don't know the gender of OP but for simplicity I", "one of his students, which is tangential to his question. This has gotten", "OP has posted a question on Academia SE. If he is not happy", "points, he has only just cranked up the volume. As an example, OP", "shared, he is free to take them on board or ignore them. Nothing", "NOT saying that personally identifiable information about the student has been revealed.) 3.", "comment threads. Although the best case scenario is to include all relevant information", "standards and they teach 99% to just pass the standard exams... I've even", "Then OP should add it to the question, either by incorporating it into", "other users' opinions. I'm afraid I can't quote the comment, because I neglected", "case scenario is to include all relevant information in the original question, I", "what can be done in such a case, where an OP is baiting", "and they teach 99% to just pass the standard exams... I've even heard", "on an individual student, who is under age. (To be clear: I am", "be clear: I am NOT saying that personally identifiable information about the student", "in response to the answer by Mayou36 which clearly stated he wasn't interested", "or by creating an addendum at the bottom of the question. More and", "choice tests where the answer is always the longest response.\" My question: what", "refer to his other classes as 'a joke;'\" \"I know the school and", "ramping up. But that's not what motivates my Meta question. Rather, I am", "volume. As an example, OP wrote a comment in response to the answer", "clearly stated he wasn't interested in other users' opinions. I'm afraid I can't", "Examples: \"The student did refer to his other classes as 'a joke;'\" \"I", "growing, ad infinitum.** The OP has been gradually adding scattered additional information about", "what motivates my Meta question. Rather, I am writing because I see several", "he wasn't interested in other users' opinions. I'm afraid I can't quote the", "logical points, he has only just cranked up the volume. As an example,", "student, who is under age. (To be clear: I am NOT saying that", "with someone, he has added no documented or documentable information, or new logical", "with extremely low standards and they teach 99% to just pass the standard", "he. Here are the red flags I see: 1. OP has been increasingly", "by Mayou36 which clearly stated he wasn't interested in other users' opinions. I'm", "now been removed. Currently visible example: \"this answer is just trying to demonize", "me.\" 2. OP has been hypercritical of one of his students, which is", "student did refer to his other classes as 'a joke;'\" \"I know the", "of one of his students, which is tangential to his question. This has", "into the text of the question, or by creating an addendum at the", "the school and I can confirm that it is an inner city school", "and opinions other users have shared, he is free to take them on", "attack on an individual student, who is under age. (To be clear: I", "or ignore them. Nothing is accomplished by arguing, around and around. When he", "OP's \"case\" against the student keeps growing, ad infinitum.** The OP has been", "and I can confirm that it is an inner city school with extremely", "and attacking an individual, who is under age? How can we make clear", "Meta question. Rather, I am writing because I see several red flags suggesting", "where the answer is always the longest response.\" My question: what can be", "is free to take them on board or ignore them. Nothing is accomplished", "added no documented or documentable information, or new logical points, he has only", "am NOT saying that personally identifiable information about the student has been revealed.)", "can be done in such a case, where an OP is baiting SE", "I am NOT saying that personally identifiable information about the student has been", "the question. More and more disorganized diatribe about the student keeps getting added", "been revealed.) 3. *OP's \"case\" against the student keeps growing, ad infinitum.* The", "been removed. Currently visible example: \"this answer is just trying to demonize me.\"", "see several red flags suggesting the OP is behaving like a provocateur. I", "bottom of the question. More and more disorganized diatribe about the student keeps", "mult choice tests where the answer is always the longest response.\" My question:", "response to the answer by Mayou36 which clearly stated he wasn't interested in", "an individual student, who is under age. (To be clear: I am NOT", "it is an inner city school with extremely low standards and they teach", "the red flags I see: 1. OP has been increasingly argumentative. OP has", "OP is baiting SE participants and attacking an individual, who is under age?", "added here and there and everywhere. Examples: \"The student did refer to his", "up the volume. As an example, OP wrote a comment in response to", "writing because I see several red flags suggesting the OP is behaving like", "a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam) Discussion has been extensive and the tone has been", "happy with the analysis and opinions other users have shared, he is free", "has been revealed.) 3. *OP's \"case\" against the student keeps growing, ad infinitum.", "wasn't interested in other users' opinions. I'm afraid I can't quote the comment,", "When he has disagreed with someone, he has added no documented or documentable", "on board or ignore them. Nothing is accomplished by arguing, around and around.", "know the gender of OP but for simplicity I will use he. Here", "appreciate that more is sometimes elicited through comments. Then OP should add it", "it into the text of the question, or by creating an addendum at", "through multiple comment threads. Although the best case scenario is to include all", "point of a personal attack on an individual student, who is under age.", "be done in such a case, where an OP is baiting SE participants", "the text of the question, or by creating an addendum at the bottom", "This has gotten now to the point of a personal attack on an", "who is under age. (To be clear: I am NOT* saying that personally", "3. *OP's \"case\" against the student keeps growing, ad infinitum.* The OP has", "threads. Although the best case scenario is to include all relevant information in", "by incorporating it into the text of the question, or by creating an", "and there and everywhere. Examples: \"The student did refer to his other classes", "they give mult choice tests where the answer is always the longest response.\"", "student has been revealed.) 3. *OP's \"case\" against the student keeps growing, ad", "the point of a personal attack on an individual student, who is under", "can't quote the comment, because I neglected to copy it before I flagged", "or new logical points, he has only just cranked up the volume. As", "relevant information in the original question, I appreciate that more is sometimes elicited", "more disorganized diatribe about the student keeps getting added here and there and", "extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam) Discussion has been extensive and the tone", "around. When he has disagreed with someone, he has added no documented or", "The OP has been gradually adding scattered additional information about the original question", "How can we make clear that provocateur-like behavior is unacceptable on Academia SE?", "information about the student has been revealed.) 3. OP's \"case\" against the student", "where an OP is baiting SE participants and attacking an individual, who is", "the comment, because I neglected to copy it before I flagged it, and", "to demonize me.\" 2. OP has been hypercritical of one of his students,", "he is not happy with the analysis and opinions other users have shared,", "an individual, who is under age? How can we make clear that provocateur-like", "keeps getting added here and there and everywhere. Examples: \"The student did refer", "original question, I appreciate that more is sometimes elicited through comments. Then OP", "My question: what can be done in such a case, where an OP", "personal attack on an individual student, who is under age. (To be clear:", "the OP is behaving like a provocateur. I don't know the gender of", "the answer is always the longest response.\" My question: what can be done", "question. More and more disorganized diatribe about the student keeps getting added here", "infinitum.* The OP has been gradually adding scattered additional information about the original", "multiple comment threads. Although the best case scenario is to include all relevant", "of the question. More and more disorganized diatribe about the student keeps getting", "student keeps getting added here and there and everywhere. Examples: \"The student did", "of the question, or by creating an addendum at the bottom of the", "for simplicity I will use he. Here are the red flags I see:", "and around. When he has disagreed with someone, he has added no documented", "the standard exams... I've even heard they give mult choice tests where the", "has gotten now to the point of a personal attack on an individual", "longest response.\" My question: what can be done in such a case, where", "being a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/80951/am-i-being-a-mean-instructor-denying-an-extension-on-a-take-home-exam) Discussion", "question, or by creating an addendum at the bottom of the question. More", "through comments. Then OP should add it to the question, either by incorporating", "Academia SE. If he is not happy with the analysis and opinions other", "a personal attack on an individual student, who is under age. (To be", "them on board or ignore them. Nothing is accomplished by arguing, around and", "question: what can be done in such a case, where an OP is", "behaving like a provocateur. I don't know the gender of OP but for", "that personally identifiable information about the student has been revealed.) 3. OP's \"case\"", "just trying to demonize me.\" 2. OP has been hypercritical of one of", "heard they give mult choice tests where the answer is always the longest", "ignore them. Nothing is accomplished by arguing, around and around. When he has", "in such a case, where an OP is baiting SE participants and attacking", "baiting SE participants and attacking an individual, who is under age? How can", "provocateur. I don't know the gender of OP but for simplicity I will", "include all relevant information in the original question, I appreciate that more is", "I'm afraid I can't quote the comment, because I neglected to copy it", "creating an addendum at the bottom of the question. More and more disorganized", "classes as 'a joke;'\" \"I know the school and I can confirm that", "is behaving like a provocateur. I don't know the gender of OP but", "Here are the red flags I see: 1. OP has been increasingly argumentative." ]
[ "members of the community. I'd be happy to hear from individual users here", "on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question) And especially this comment by @Wrzlprmft: > > \"@Fomite:", "(question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question) And especially this comment by @Wrzlprmft: > >", "if the visitors go on to continue to be members of the community.", "fairly active user and contributor to the site that the questions and answers", "Stemming partially from this meta thread: [Why are we challenging the premise rather", "than answering the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question) And especially this comment", "be members of the community. I'd be happy to hear from individual users", "site that the questions and answers that have made me consider throwing in", "Network Questions. As far as I can tell, the primary detriment is the", "hear from individual users here who found us via Hot Network Questions. As", "is the questions that end up on the Hot Network Questions listing tend", "Hot Network Questions. For the sake of \"Meta-votes are Agree/Disagree\" clairity, I'd suggest", "I can tell, the primary detriment is the questions that end up on", "remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question) And especially this comment by @Wrzlprmft: > > \"@Fomite: For whatever it’s", "most of the problematic comments > and answers come from users attracted to", "continue to be members of the community. I'd be happy to hear from", "[Why are we challenging the premise rather than answering the question (question on", "can see, the primary benefit is a sudden influx of users, but do", "come from users attracted to the question via the hot > network questions", "far as I can tell, the primary detriment is the questions that end", "As far as I can see, the primary benefit is a sudden influx", "have evidence that they stay? Growth from that listing is only useful growth", "listing is only useful growth if the visitors go on to continue to", "and answers come from users attracted to the question via the hot >", "who found us via Hot Network Questions. As far as I can tell,", "And especially this comment by @Wrzlprmft: > > \"@Fomite: For whatever it’s worth,", "Questions. As far as I can tell, the primary detriment is the questions", "Questions listing tend to drop fairly dramatically in quality, become more controversial, etc.", "growth if the visitors go on to continue to be members of the", "consider throwing in the towel have all been Hot Network Questions. For the", "a sudden influx of users, but do we have evidence that they stay?", "challenging the premise rather than answering the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question)", "benefit from being in that listing? As far as I can see, the", "detriment is the questions that end up on the Hot Network Questions listing", "> > \"@Fomite: For whatever it’s worth, most of the problematic comments >", "the premise rather than answering the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question) And", "the questions that end up on the Hot Network Questions listing tend to", "I'd suggest an Upvote is \"HNQs are helpful\" and a Downvote is \"HNQs", "directly from our own community.\" > > > Does the Academia community actually", "towel have all been Hot Network Questions. For the sake of \"Meta-votes are", "via Hot Network Questions. As far as I can tell, the primary detriment", "tell, the primary detriment is the questions that end up on the Hot", "\"Meta-votes are Agree/Disagree\" clairity, I'd suggest an Upvote is \"HNQs are helpful\" and", "they stay? Growth from that listing is only useful growth if the visitors", "to drop fairly dramatically in quality, become more controversial, etc. I can say,", "Does the Academia community actually benefit from being in that listing? As far", "are Agree/Disagree\" clairity, I'd suggest an Upvote is \"HNQs are helpful\" and a", "see, the primary benefit is a sudden influx of users, but do we", "here who found us via Hot Network Questions. As far as I can", "this meta thread: [Why are we challenging the premise rather than answering the", "in the towel have all been Hot Network Questions. For the sake of", "the site that the questions and answers that have made me consider throwing", "the Hot Network Questions listing tend to drop fairly dramatically in quality, become", "primary benefit is a sudden influx of users, but do we have evidence", "as I can see, the primary benefit is a sudden influx of users,", "far as I can see, the primary benefit is a sudden influx of", "of the problematic comments > and answers come from users attracted to the", "been Hot Network Questions. For the sake of \"Meta-votes are Agree/Disagree\" clairity, I'd", "For whatever it’s worth, most of the problematic comments > and answers come", "quality, become more controversial, etc. I can say, as a fairly active user", "the Academia community actually benefit from being in that listing? As far as", "in that listing? As far as I can see, the primary benefit is", "more controversial, etc. I can say, as a fairly active user and contributor", "from this meta thread: [Why are we challenging the premise rather than answering", "can tell, the primary detriment is the questions that end up on the", "the visitors go on to continue to be members of the community. I'd", "the sake of \"Meta-votes are Agree/Disagree\" clairity, I'd suggest an Upvote is \"HNQs", "Hot Network Questions listing tend to drop fairly dramatically in quality, become more", "fairly dramatically in quality, become more controversial, etc. I can say, as a", "of users, but do we have evidence that they stay? Growth from that", "from individual users here who found us via Hot Network Questions. As far", "found us via Hot Network Questions. As far as I can tell, the", "comments > and answers come from users attracted to the question via the", "Network Questions. For the sake of \"Meta-votes are Agree/Disagree\" clairity, I'd suggest an", "\"@Fomite: For whatever it’s worth, most of the problematic comments > and answers", "we have evidence that they stay? Growth from that listing is only useful", "end up on the Hot Network Questions listing tend to drop fairly dramatically", "stay? Growth from that listing is only useful growth if the visitors go", "the community. I'd be happy to hear from individual users here who found", "in quality, become more controversial, etc. I can say, as a fairly active", "is only useful growth if the visitors go on to continue to be", "not directly from our own community.\" > > > Does the Academia community", "from being in that listing? As far as I can see, the primary", "active user and contributor to the site that the questions and answers that", "on to continue to be members of the community. I'd be happy to", "can say, as a fairly active user and contributor to the site that", "users here who found us via Hot Network Questions. As far as I", "from users attracted to the question via the hot > network questions and", "our own community.\" > > > Does the Academia community actually benefit from", "only useful growth if the visitors go on to continue to be members", "the problematic comments > and answers come from users attracted to the question", "the hot > network questions and not directly from our own community.\" >", "this comment by @Wrzlprmft: > > \"@Fomite: For whatever it’s worth, most of", "@Wrzlprmft: > > \"@Fomite: For whatever it’s worth, most of the problematic comments", "> Does the Academia community actually benefit from being in that listing? As", "have all been Hot Network Questions. For the sake of \"Meta-votes are Agree/Disagree\"", "go on to continue to be members of the community. I'd be happy", "that listing? As far as I can see, the primary benefit is a", "community actually benefit from being in that listing? As far as I can", "that end up on the Hot Network Questions listing tend to drop fairly", "from our own community.\" > > > Does the Academia community actually benefit", "tend to drop fairly dramatically in quality, become more controversial, etc. I can", "as a fairly active user and contributor to the site that the questions", "the question via the hot > network questions and not directly from our", "attracted to the question via the hot > network questions and not directly", "answers that have made me consider throwing in the towel have all been", "have made me consider throwing in the towel have all been Hot Network", "questions that end up on the Hot Network Questions listing tend to drop", "of the community. I'd be happy to hear from individual users here who", "answering the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question) And especially this comment by", "actually benefit from being in that listing? As far as I can see,", "to be members of the community. I'd be happy to hear from individual", "etc. I can say, as a fairly active user and contributor to the", "> and answers come from users attracted to the question via the hot", "For the sake of \"Meta-votes are Agree/Disagree\" clairity, I'd suggest an Upvote is", "users, but do we have evidence that they stay? Growth from that listing", "a fairly active user and contributor to the site that the questions and", "an Upvote is \"HNQs are helpful\" and a Downvote is \"HNQs are unhelpful.\"", "community.\" > > > Does the Academia community actually benefit from being in", "questions and not directly from our own community.\" > > > Does the", "be happy to hear from individual users here who found us via Hot", "us via Hot Network Questions. As far as I can tell, the primary", "happy to hear from individual users here who found us via Hot Network", "whatever it’s worth, most of the problematic comments > and answers come from", "drop fairly dramatically in quality, become more controversial, etc. I can say, as", "the primary benefit is a sudden influx of users, but do we have", "the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question) And especially this comment by @Wrzlprmft:", "and contributor to the site that the questions and answers that have made", "dramatically in quality, become more controversial, etc. I can say, as a fairly", "listing? As far as I can see, the primary benefit is a sudden", "Network Questions listing tend to drop fairly dramatically in quality, become more controversial,", "Agree/Disagree\" clairity, I'd suggest an Upvote is \"HNQs are helpful\" and a Downvote", "of \"Meta-votes are Agree/Disagree\" clairity, I'd suggest an Upvote is \"HNQs are helpful\"", "> > > Does the Academia community actually benefit from being in that", "Academia community actually benefit from being in that listing? As far as I", "> \"@Fomite: For whatever it’s worth, most of the problematic comments > and", "via the hot > network questions and not directly from our own community.\"", "> network questions and not directly from our own community.\" > > >", "suggest an Upvote is \"HNQs are helpful\" and a Downvote is \"HNQs are", "to continue to be members of the community. I'd be happy to hear", "and not directly from our own community.\" > > > Does the Academia", "hot > network questions and not directly from our own community.\" > >", "listing tend to drop fairly dramatically in quality, become more controversial, etc. I", "to the site that the questions and answers that have made me consider", "sake of \"Meta-votes are Agree/Disagree\" clairity, I'd suggest an Upvote is \"HNQs are", "worth, most of the problematic comments > and answers come from users attracted", "answers come from users attracted to the question via the hot > network", "individual users here who found us via Hot Network Questions. As far as", "that have made me consider throwing in the towel have all been Hot", "are we challenging the premise rather than answering the question (question on potential", "users attracted to the question via the hot > network questions and not", "> > Does the Academia community actually benefit from being in that listing?", "rather than answering the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question) And especially this", "up on the Hot Network Questions listing tend to drop fairly dramatically in", "influx of users, but do we have evidence that they stay? Growth from", "user and contributor to the site that the questions and answers that have", "me consider throwing in the towel have all been Hot Network Questions. For", "question via the hot > network questions and not directly from our own", "made me consider throwing in the towel have all been Hot Network Questions.", "that the questions and answers that have made me consider throwing in the", "especially this comment by @Wrzlprmft: > > \"@Fomite: For whatever it’s worth, most", "own community.\" > > > Does the Academia community actually benefit from being", "meta thread: [Why are we challenging the premise rather than answering the question", "that they stay? Growth from that listing is only useful growth if the", "controversial, etc. I can say, as a fairly active user and contributor to", "say, as a fairly active user and contributor to the site that the", "partially from this meta thread: [Why are we challenging the premise rather than", "problematic comments > and answers come from users attracted to the question via", "question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question) And especially this comment by @Wrzlprmft: >", "I can say, as a fairly active user and contributor to the site", "primary detriment is the questions that end up on the Hot Network Questions", "but do we have evidence that they stay? Growth from that listing is", "as I can tell, the primary detriment is the questions that end up", "contributor to the site that the questions and answers that have made me", "that listing is only useful growth if the visitors go on to continue", "the towel have all been Hot Network Questions. For the sake of \"Meta-votes", "to the question via the hot > network questions and not directly from", "it’s worth, most of the problematic comments > and answers come from users", "do we have evidence that they stay? Growth from that listing is only", "Growth from that listing is only useful growth if the visitors go on", "I'd be happy to hear from individual users here who found us via", "network questions and not directly from our own community.\" > > > Does", "become more controversial, etc. I can say, as a fairly active user and", "evidence that they stay? Growth from that listing is only useful growth if", "thread: [Why are we challenging the premise rather than answering the question (question", "and answers that have made me consider throwing in the towel have all", "the questions and answers that have made me consider throwing in the towel", "Questions. For the sake of \"Meta-votes are Agree/Disagree\" clairity, I'd suggest an Upvote", "to hear from individual users here who found us via Hot Network Questions.", "from that listing is only useful growth if the visitors go on to", "benefit is a sudden influx of users, but do we have evidence that", "community. I'd be happy to hear from individual users here who found us", "comment by @Wrzlprmft: > > \"@Fomite: For whatever it’s worth, most of the", "Hot Network Questions. As far as I can tell, the primary detriment is", "throwing in the towel have all been Hot Network Questions. For the sake", "all been Hot Network Questions. For the sake of \"Meta-votes are Agree/Disagree\" clairity,", "clairity, I'd suggest an Upvote is \"HNQs are helpful\" and a Downvote is", "on the Hot Network Questions listing tend to drop fairly dramatically in quality,", "useful growth if the visitors go on to continue to be members of", "questions and answers that have made me consider throwing in the towel have", "being in that listing? As far as I can see, the primary benefit", "the primary detriment is the questions that end up on the Hot Network", "we challenging the premise rather than answering the question (question on potential sexist", "As far as I can tell, the primary detriment is the questions that", "potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question) And especially this comment by @Wrzlprmft: > > \"@Fomite: For", "is a sudden influx of users, but do we have evidence that they", "sudden influx of users, but do we have evidence that they stay? Growth", "premise rather than answering the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question) And especially", "visitors go on to continue to be members of the community. I'd be", "I can see, the primary benefit is a sudden influx of users, but", "sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3549/why-are-we-challenging-the-premise-rather-than-answering-the-question-question) And especially this comment by @Wrzlprmft: > > \"@Fomite: For whatever", "by @Wrzlprmft: > > \"@Fomite: For whatever it’s worth, most of the problematic" ]
[ "should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436), please restore the \"ethnicity\" tag which", "removed. As my answer shows, this question will be viewed and answered in", "on the reader's racial identity and affinity. (Should I have flagged the question", "question will be viewed and answered in different ways depending on the reader's", "viewed and answered in different ways depending on the reader's racial identity and", "be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436), please restore the \"ethnicity\" tag which a moderator removed. As", "As my answer shows, this question will be viewed and answered in different", "different ways depending on the reader's racial identity and affinity. (Should I have", "will be viewed and answered in different ways depending on the reader's racial", "\"ethnicity\" tag which a moderator removed. As my answer shows, this question will", "answered in different ways depending on the reader's racial identity and affinity. (Should", "my answer shows, this question will be viewed and answered in different ways", "in different ways depending on the reader's racial identity and affinity. (Should I", "racial identity and affinity. (Should I have flagged the question instead of writing", "be viewed and answered in different ways depending on the reader's racial identity", "depending on the reader's racial identity and affinity. (Should I have flagged the", "moderator removed. As my answer shows, this question will be viewed and answered", "(MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436), please restore the \"ethnicity\" tag which a moderator removed. As my answer", "the reader's racial identity and affinity. (Should I have flagged the question instead", "to races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436), please restore the \"ethnicity\"", "reader's racial identity and affinity. (Should I have flagged the question instead of", "which a moderator removed. As my answer shows, this question will be viewed", "races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436), please restore the \"ethnicity\" tag", "this question will be viewed and answered in different ways depending on the", "ways depending on the reader's racial identity and affinity. (Should I have flagged", "please restore the \"ethnicity\" tag which a moderator removed. As my answer shows,", "restore the \"ethnicity\" tag which a moderator removed. As my answer shows, this", "this question, [When referring to races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436),", "'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436), please restore the \"ethnicity\" tag which a moderator removed.", "[When referring to races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436), please restore", "'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436), please restore the \"ethnicity\" tag which a", "tag which a moderator removed. As my answer shows, this question will be", "and affinity. (Should I have flagged the question instead of writing a Meta", "answer shows, this question will be viewed and answered in different ways depending", "capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436), please restore the \"ethnicity\" tag which a moderator removed. As my", "shows, this question will be viewed and answered in different ways depending on", "For this question, [When referring to races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized?", "a moderator removed. As my answer shows, this question will be viewed and", "identity and affinity. (Should I have flagged the question instead of writing a", "the \"ethnicity\" tag which a moderator removed. As my answer shows, this question", "affinity. (Should I have flagged the question instead of writing a Meta question?)", "and answered in different ways depending on the reader's racial identity and affinity.", "and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436), please restore the \"ethnicity\" tag which a moderator", "question, [When referring to races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436), please", "referring to races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/32436), please restore the" ]
[ "question. The part of this post that is an answer doesn't add anything", "that is an answer doesn't add anything over other, better answers that offer", "it as \"not an answer,\" because it reiterates a previous answer, without adding", "was mistaken in something I wrote in a comment. In this example, the", "Meta question. My question is, if I see \"dogpiling\" going on, i.e. more", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436> The body of the helpful moderator comment below the answer: > >", "elaborating on the first part if you have something to add over the", "on this site, rather than offering an answer to the question. The part", "has been flagged by several users as \"not an answer\". I'm inclined to", "offer the same point of view but more details and explanation. I suggest", "is, if I see \"dogpiling\" going on, i.e. more and more people are", "on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436) --- Edit: I found an example of helpful", "been flagged by several users as \"not an answer\". I'm inclined to agree;", "I'm inclined to agree; most of this post is about criticizing the OP's", "a user, may I flag the answer? If so, for what reason? Perhaps", "details and explanation. I suggest editing to remove that last part, and elaborating", "view but more details and explanation. I suggest editing to remove that last", "body of the helpful moderator comment below the answer: > > This has", "about \"Should I call out a student who may have behaved in a", "appropriate, whether they were accepted, etc. I'm just posting this example to further", "as \"not an answer,\" because it reiterates a previous answer, without adding anything", "doesn't add anything over other, better answers that offer the same point of", "My question is, if I see \"dogpiling\" going on, i.e. more and more", "and more people are jumping on a bandwagon, ganging up on a user,", "ganging up on a user, may I flag the answer? If so, for", "flags. Of course I don't know whether the flags were appropriate, whether they", "If so, for what reason? Perhaps I could flag it as \"not an", "have behaved in a sexist way?\" is not the only situation where I", "by several users as \"not an answer\". I'm inclined to agree; most of", "a sexist way?\" is not the only situation where I have seen dogpiling.", "\"not an answer\". I'm inclined to agree; most of this post is about", "Perhaps I could flag it as \"not an answer,\" because it reiterates a", "on a bandwagon, ganging up on a user, may I flag the answer?", "post that is an answer doesn't add anything over other, better answers that", "editing to remove that last part, and elaborating on the first part if", "a bandwagon, ganging up on a user, may I flag the answer? If", "a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436) --- Edit: I found an example of helpful moderator", "the only situation where I have seen dogpiling. Another recent example would be", "accepted, etc. I'm just posting this example to further the discussion. (Note, I", "did not delete the answer. The answer was in fact auto-deleted.) Here is", "this example to further the discussion. (Note, I was mistaken in something I", "on, i.e. more and more people are jumping on a bandwagon, ganging up", "some \"not an answer\" flags. Of course I don't know whether the flags", "just posting this example to further the discussion. (Note, I was mistaken in", "would be [Am I being a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a", "the answer? If so, for what reason? Perhaps I could flag it as", "by an interesting [answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3562/32436) to another Academia Meta question. My question is, if", "a student who may have behaved in a sexist way?\" is not the", "the moderator did not delete the answer. The answer was in fact auto-deleted.)", "could flag it as \"not an answer,\" because it reiterates a previous answer,", "because it reiterates a previous answer, without adding anything new? The now famous", "something to add over the other answers. Otherwise, I recommend deleting this. >", "up on a user, may I flag the answer? If so, for what", "answer: > > This has been flagged by several users as \"not an", "I wrote in a comment. In this example, the moderator did not delete", "out a student who may have behaved in a sexist way?\" is not", "this example, the moderator did not delete the answer. The answer was in", "moderator did not delete the answer. The answer was in fact auto-deleted.) Here", "answer\". I'm inclined to agree; most of this post is about criticizing the", "i.e. more and more people are jumping on a bandwagon, ganging up on", "users as \"not an answer\". I'm inclined to agree; most of this post", "way?\" is not the only situation where I have seen dogpiling. Another recent", "same point of view but more details and explanation. I suggest editing to", "offering an answer to the question. The part of this post that is", "discussion. (Note, I was mistaken in something I wrote in a comment. In", "dogpiling. Another recent example would be [Am I being a \"mean\" instructor, denying", "instructor, denying an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436) --- Edit: I found", "part if you have something to add over the other answers. Otherwise, I", "which was apparently triggered by some \"not an answer\" flags. Of course I", "is not the only situation where I have seen dogpiling. Another recent example", "is an answer doesn't add anything over other, better answers that offer the", "another Academia Meta question. My question is, if I see \"dogpiling\" going on,", "know whether the flags were appropriate, whether they were accepted, etc. I'm just", "to another Academia Meta question. My question is, if I see \"dogpiling\" going", "I see \"dogpiling\" going on, i.e. more and more people are jumping on", "new? The now famous question about \"Should I call out a student who", "see \"dogpiling\" going on, i.e. more and more people are jumping on a", "an answer\" flags. Of course I don't know whether the flags were appropriate,", "(Note, I was mistaken in something I wrote in a comment. In this", "answer was in fact auto-deleted.) Here is a link the the answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436>", "to remove that last part, and elaborating on the first part if you", "activities on this site, rather than offering an answer to the question. The", "In this example, the moderator did not delete the answer. The answer was", "behaved in a sexist way?\" is not the only situation where I have", "better answers that offer the same point of view but more details and", "the answer. The answer was in fact auto-deleted.) Here is a link the", "home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436) --- Edit: I found an example of helpful moderator action which", "reason? Perhaps I could flag it as \"not an answer,\" because it reiterates", "I was mistaken in something I wrote in a comment. In this example,", "not delete the answer. The answer was in fact auto-deleted.) Here is a", "to the question. The part of this post that is an answer doesn't", "on a user, may I flag the answer? If so, for what reason?", "call out a student who may have behaved in a sexist way?\" is", "below the answer: > > This has been flagged by several users as", "part of this post that is an answer doesn't add anything over other,", "are jumping on a bandwagon, ganging up on a user, may I flag", "first part if you have something to add over the other answers. Otherwise,", "part, and elaborating on the first part if you have something to add", "if you have something to add over the other answers. Otherwise, I recommend", "[answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3562/32436) to another Academia Meta question. My question is, if I see \"dogpiling\"", "more people are jumping on a bandwagon, ganging up on a user, may", "course I don't know whether the flags were appropriate, whether they were accepted,", "\"not an answer\" flags. Of course I don't know whether the flags were", "sexist way?\" is not the only situation where I have seen dogpiling. Another", "rather than offering an answer to the question. The part of this post", "exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436) --- Edit: I found an example of helpful moderator action which was", "a comment. In this example, the moderator did not delete the answer. The", "as \"not an answer\". I'm inclined to agree; most of this post is", "OP's activities on this site, rather than offering an answer to the question.", "Another recent example would be [Am I being a \"mean\" instructor, denying an", "flag it as \"not an answer,\" because it reiterates a previous answer, without", "flagged by several users as \"not an answer\". I'm inclined to agree; most", "answer,\" because it reiterates a previous answer, without adding anything new? The now", "and explanation. I suggest editing to remove that last part, and elaborating on", "the discussion. (Note, I was mistaken in something I wrote in a comment.", "I being a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436)", "--- Edit: I found an example of helpful moderator action which was apparently", "jumping on a bandwagon, ganging up on a user, may I flag the", "of this post that is an answer doesn't add anything over other, better", "The now famous question about \"Should I call out a student who may", "denying an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436) --- Edit: I found an", "moderator comment below the answer: > > This has been flagged by several", "the answer: > > This has been flagged by several users as \"not", "I suggest editing to remove that last part, and elaborating on the first", "situation where I have seen dogpiling. Another recent example would be [Am I", "apparently triggered by some \"not an answer\" flags. Of course I don't know", "this post is about criticizing the OP's activities on this site, rather than", "\"dogpiling\" going on, i.e. more and more people are jumping on a bandwagon,", "have seen dogpiling. Another recent example would be [Am I being a \"mean\"", "in something I wrote in a comment. In this example, the moderator did", "the question. The part of this post that is an answer doesn't add", "than offering an answer to the question. The part of this post that", "auto-deleted.) Here is a link the the answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436> The body of the", "most of this post is about criticizing the OP's activities on this site,", "extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436) --- Edit: I found an example of", "bandwagon, ganging up on a user, may I flag the answer? If so,", "whether they were accepted, etc. I'm just posting this example to further the", "comment below the answer: > > This has been flagged by several users", "take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436) --- Edit: I found an example of helpful moderator action", "the OP's activities on this site, rather than offering an answer to the", "answer? If so, for what reason? Perhaps I could flag it as \"not", "a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436) --- Edit:", "I don't know whether the flags were appropriate, whether they were accepted, etc.", "user, may I flag the answer? If so, for what reason? Perhaps I", "answer. The answer was in fact auto-deleted.) Here is a link the the", "interesting [answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3562/32436) to another Academia Meta question. My question is, if I see", "answers that offer the same point of view but more details and explanation.", "triggered by some \"not an answer\" flags. Of course I don't know whether", "remove that last part, and elaborating on the first part if you have", "the first part if you have something to add over the other answers.", "Edit: I found an example of helpful moderator action which was apparently triggered", "it reiterates a previous answer, without adding anything new? The now famous question", "an answer to the question. The part of this post that is an", "\"Should I call out a student who may have behaved in a sexist", "may have behaved in a sexist way?\" is not the only situation where", "further the discussion. (Note, I was mistaken in something I wrote in a", "what reason? Perhaps I could flag it as \"not an answer,\" because it", "answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436> The body of the helpful moderator comment below the answer: >", "for what reason? Perhaps I could flag it as \"not an answer,\" because", "only situation where I have seen dogpiling. Another recent example would be [Am", "an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436) --- Edit: I found an example", "I'm just posting this example to further the discussion. (Note, I was mistaken", "helpful moderator comment below the answer: > > This has been flagged by", "last part, and elaborating on the first part if you have something to", "of view but more details and explanation. I suggest editing to remove that", "adding anything new? The now famous question about \"Should I call out a", "that last part, and elaborating on the first part if you have something", "being a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436) ---", "\"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a take home exam](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80951/32436) --- Edit: I", "an answer,\" because it reiterates a previous answer, without adding anything new? The", "moderator action which was apparently triggered by some \"not an answer\" flags. Of", "suggest editing to remove that last part, and elaborating on the first part", "so, for what reason? Perhaps I could flag it as \"not an answer,\"", "where I have seen dogpiling. Another recent example would be [Am I being", "comment. In this example, the moderator did not delete the answer. The answer", "add over the other answers. Otherwise, I recommend deleting this. > > >", "other, better answers that offer the same point of view but more details", "question. My question is, if I see \"dogpiling\" going on, i.e. more and", "is a link the the answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436> The body of the helpful moderator", "of helpful moderator action which was apparently triggered by some \"not an answer\"", "whether the flags were appropriate, whether they were accepted, etc. I'm just posting", "without adding anything new? The now famous question about \"Should I call out", "seen dogpiling. Another recent example would be [Am I being a \"mean\" instructor,", "an answer doesn't add anything over other, better answers that offer the same", "be [Am I being a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a take", "you have something to add over the other answers. Otherwise, I recommend deleting", "anything over other, better answers that offer the same point of view but", "may I flag the answer? If so, for what reason? Perhaps I could", "Here is a link the the answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436> The body of the helpful", "people are jumping on a bandwagon, ganging up on a user, may I", "I found an example of helpful moderator action which was apparently triggered by", "have something to add over the other answers. Otherwise, I recommend deleting this.", "example to further the discussion. (Note, I was mistaken in something I wrote", "a link the the answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436> The body of the helpful moderator comment", "I could flag it as \"not an answer,\" because it reiterates a previous", "something I wrote in a comment. In this example, the moderator did not", "several users as \"not an answer\". I'm inclined to agree; most of this", "the answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436> The body of the helpful moderator comment below the answer:", "of the helpful moderator comment below the answer: > > This has been", "but more details and explanation. I suggest editing to remove that last part,", "is motivated by an interesting [answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3562/32436) to another Academia Meta question. My question", "to add over the other answers. Otherwise, I recommend deleting this. > >", "This question is motivated by an interesting [answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3562/32436) to another Academia Meta question.", "to further the discussion. (Note, I was mistaken in something I wrote in", "action which was apparently triggered by some \"not an answer\" flags. Of course", "posting this example to further the discussion. (Note, I was mistaken in something", "if I see \"dogpiling\" going on, i.e. more and more people are jumping", "explanation. I suggest editing to remove that last part, and elaborating on the", "found an example of helpful moderator action which was apparently triggered by some", "site, rather than offering an answer to the question. The part of this", "more and more people are jumping on a bandwagon, ganging up on a", "a previous answer, without adding anything new? The now famous question about \"Should", "flags were appropriate, whether they were accepted, etc. I'm just posting this example", "that offer the same point of view but more details and explanation. I", "now famous question about \"Should I call out a student who may have", "they were accepted, etc. I'm just posting this example to further the discussion.", "student who may have behaved in a sexist way?\" is not the only", "wrote in a comment. In this example, the moderator did not delete the", "not the only situation where I have seen dogpiling. Another recent example would", "the the answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436> The body of the helpful moderator comment below the", "The body of the helpful moderator comment below the answer: > > This", "on the first part if you have something to add over the other", "I flag the answer? If so, for what reason? Perhaps I could flag", "> > This has been flagged by several users as \"not an answer\".", "in a comment. In this example, the moderator did not delete the answer.", "[Am I being a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on a take home", "delete the answer. The answer was in fact auto-deleted.) Here is a link", "famous question about \"Should I call out a student who may have behaved", "is about criticizing the OP's activities on this site, rather than offering an", "the flags were appropriate, whether they were accepted, etc. I'm just posting this", "this site, rather than offering an answer to the question. The part of", "the helpful moderator comment below the answer: > > This has been flagged", "more details and explanation. I suggest editing to remove that last part, and", "fact auto-deleted.) Here is a link the the answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436> The body of", "by some \"not an answer\" flags. Of course I don't know whether the", "inclined to agree; most of this post is about criticizing the OP's activities", "over other, better answers that offer the same point of view but more", "an interesting [answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3562/32436) to another Academia Meta question. My question is, if I", "helpful moderator action which was apparently triggered by some \"not an answer\" flags.", "This has been flagged by several users as \"not an answer\". I'm inclined", "were appropriate, whether they were accepted, etc. I'm just posting this example to", "mistaken in something I wrote in a comment. In this example, the moderator", "the same point of view but more details and explanation. I suggest editing", "add anything over other, better answers that offer the same point of view", "question is motivated by an interesting [answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3562/32436) to another Academia Meta question. My", "flag the answer? If so, for what reason? Perhaps I could flag it", "and elaborating on the first part if you have something to add over", "was in fact auto-deleted.) Here is a link the the answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436> The", "The part of this post that is an answer doesn't add anything over", "link the the answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436> The body of the helpful moderator comment below", "question is, if I see \"dogpiling\" going on, i.e. more and more people", "I have seen dogpiling. Another recent example would be [Am I being a", "answer doesn't add anything over other, better answers that offer the same point", "this post that is an answer doesn't add anything over other, better answers", "in a sexist way?\" is not the only situation where I have seen", "question about \"Should I call out a student who may have behaved in", "don't know whether the flags were appropriate, whether they were accepted, etc. I'm", "The answer was in fact auto-deleted.) Here is a link the the answer:", "Of course I don't know whether the flags were appropriate, whether they were", "recent example would be [Am I being a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension", "agree; most of this post is about criticizing the OP's activities on this", "who may have behaved in a sexist way?\" is not the only situation", "about criticizing the OP's activities on this site, rather than offering an answer", "to agree; most of this post is about criticizing the OP's activities on", "answer to the question. The part of this post that is an answer", "Academia Meta question. My question is, if I see \"dogpiling\" going on, i.e.", "going on, i.e. more and more people are jumping on a bandwagon, ganging", "of this post is about criticizing the OP's activities on this site, rather", "> This has been flagged by several users as \"not an answer\". I'm", "etc. I'm just posting this example to further the discussion. (Note, I was", "an answer\". I'm inclined to agree; most of this post is about criticizing", "criticizing the OP's activities on this site, rather than offering an answer to", "example of helpful moderator action which was apparently triggered by some \"not an", "were accepted, etc. I'm just posting this example to further the discussion. (Note,", "answer, without adding anything new? The now famous question about \"Should I call", "example, the moderator did not delete the answer. The answer was in fact", "motivated by an interesting [answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3562/32436) to another Academia Meta question. My question is,", "reiterates a previous answer, without adding anything new? The now famous question about", "post is about criticizing the OP's activities on this site, rather than offering", "an example of helpful moderator action which was apparently triggered by some \"not", "example would be [Am I being a \"mean\" instructor, denying an extension on", "previous answer, without adding anything new? The now famous question about \"Should I", "answer\" flags. Of course I don't know whether the flags were appropriate, whether", "\"not an answer,\" because it reiterates a previous answer, without adding anything new?", "in fact auto-deleted.) Here is a link the the answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81033/32436> The body", "point of view but more details and explanation. I suggest editing to remove", "anything new? The now famous question about \"Should I call out a student", "I call out a student who may have behaved in a sexist way?\"", "was apparently triggered by some \"not an answer\" flags. Of course I don't" ]
[ "discussed at great length. Is it appropriate now to flag the existing answers", "what should, or could, be done instead? If moderators already provided guidance about", "controversial [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80561/32436) was substantially rewritten, but not before a number of answers were", "substantially rewritten, but not before a number of answers were posted and discussed", "whether this other question is relevant: [What to do about old questions whose", "word?) (Not sure whether this other question is relevant: [What to do about", "[Why are we challenging the premise rather than answering the question (question on", "If moderators already provided guidance about this in the following related Meta question,", "the right word?) (Not sure whether this other question is relevant: [What to", "answer the question in its rewritten form (i.e. flag as \"not an answer\")?", "\"not an answer\")? If not, what should, or could, be done instead? If", "question, I apologize and would be glad if someone could please remind me", "flag as \"not an answer\")? If not, what should, or could, be done", "A controversial [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80561/32436) was substantially rewritten, but not before a number of answers", "or could, be done instead? If moderators already provided guidance about this in", "provided guidance about this in the following related Meta question, I apologize and", "a number of answers were posted and discussed at great length. Is it", "Is it appropriate now to flag the existing answers that don't answer the", "flag the existing answers that don't answer the question in its rewritten form", "If not, what should, or could, be done instead? If moderators already provided", "related Meta question, I apologize and would be glad if someone could please", "conclusion was (it was a very long thread): [Why are we challenging the", "sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436). (Is thread the right word?) (Not sure whether this other question", "could please remind me what the conclusion was (it was a very* long", "[question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80561/32436) was substantially rewritten, but not before a number of answers were posted", "is relevant: [What to do about old questions whose answers are now invalid](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1699/what-to-do-about-old-questions-whose-answers-are-now-invalid))", "number of answers were posted and discussed at great length. Is it appropriate", "question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436). (Is thread* the right word?) (Not sure", "the question in its rewritten form (i.e. flag as \"not an answer\")? If", "in the following related Meta question, I apologize and would be glad if", "answering the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436). (Is thread* the right word?)", "done instead? If moderators already provided guidance about this in the following related", "long thread): [Why are we challenging the premise rather than answering the question", "to flag the existing answers that don't answer the question in its rewritten", "about this in the following related Meta question, I apologize and would be", "should, or could, be done instead? If moderators already provided guidance about this", "other question is relevant: [What to do about old questions whose answers are", "at great length. Is it appropriate now to flag the existing answers that", "appropriate now to flag the existing answers that don't answer the question in", "rewritten form (i.e. flag as \"not an answer\")? If not, what should, or", "following related Meta question, I apologize and would be glad if someone could", "and discussed at great length. Is it appropriate now to flag the existing", "as \"not an answer\")? If not, what should, or could, be done instead?", "question is relevant: [What to do about old questions whose answers are now", "that don't answer the question in its rewritten form (i.e. flag as \"not", "it appropriate now to flag the existing answers that don't answer the question", "an answer\")? If not, what should, or could, be done instead? If moderators", "I apologize and would be glad if someone could please remind me what", "now to flag the existing answers that don't answer the question in its", "but not before a number of answers were posted and discussed at great", "Meta question, I apologize and would be glad if someone could please remind", "than answering the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436). (Is thread the right", "and would be glad if someone could please remind me what the conclusion", "before a number of answers were posted and discussed at great length. Is", "if someone could please remind me what the conclusion was (it was a", "the premise rather than answering the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436). (Is", "on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436). (Is thread the right word?) (Not sure whether this", "posted and discussed at great length. Is it appropriate now to flag the", "already provided guidance about this in the following related Meta question, I apologize", "challenging the premise rather than answering the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436).", "was substantially rewritten, but not before a number of answers were posted and", "apologize and would be glad if someone could please remind me what the", "the existing answers that don't answer the question in its rewritten form (i.e.", "answers that don't answer the question in its rewritten form (i.e. flag as", "(it was a very* long thread): [Why are we challenging the premise rather", "be glad if someone could please remind me what the conclusion was (it", "a very long thread): [Why are we challenging the premise rather than answering", "was a very long thread): [Why are we challenging the premise rather than", "was (it was a very long thread): [Why are we challenging the premise", "please remind me what the conclusion was (it was a very long thread):", "of answers were posted and discussed at great length. Is it appropriate now", "instead? If moderators already provided guidance about this in the following related Meta", "in its rewritten form (i.e. flag as \"not an answer\")? If not, what", "could, be done instead? If moderators already provided guidance about this in the", "existing answers that don't answer the question in its rewritten form (i.e. flag", "moderators already provided guidance about this in the following related Meta question, I", "remind me what the conclusion was (it was a very long thread): [Why", "this in the following related Meta question, I apologize and would be glad", "the conclusion was (it was a very long thread): [Why are we challenging", "remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436). (Is thread the right word?) (Not sure whether this other question is", "someone could please remind me what the conclusion was (it was a very", "are we challenging the premise rather than answering the question (question on potential", "be done instead? If moderators already provided guidance about this in the following", "thread* the right word?) (Not sure whether this other question is relevant: [What", "don't answer the question in its rewritten form (i.e. flag as \"not an", "premise rather than answering the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436). (Is thread", "sure whether this other question is relevant: [What to do about old questions", "potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436). (Is thread* the right word?) (Not sure whether this other", "(i.e. flag as \"not an answer\")? If not, what should, or could, be", "not before a number of answers were posted and discussed at great length.", "(Not sure whether this other question is relevant: [What to do about old", "not, what should, or could, be done instead? If moderators already provided guidance", "were posted and discussed at great length. Is it appropriate now to flag", "rather than answering the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436). (Is thread the", "answers were posted and discussed at great length. Is it appropriate now to", "great length. Is it appropriate now to flag the existing answers that don't", "would be glad if someone could please remind me what the conclusion was", "form (i.e. flag as \"not an answer\")? If not, what should, or could,", "guidance about this in the following related Meta question, I apologize and would", "the question (question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436). (Is thread the right word?) (Not", "length. Is it appropriate now to flag the existing answers that don't answer", "what the conclusion was (it was a very* long thread): [Why are we", "thread): [Why are we challenging the premise rather than answering the question (question", "(question on potential sexist remarks)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3549/32436). (Is thread the right word?) (Not sure whether", "answer\")? If not, what should, or could, be done instead? If moderators already", "this other question is relevant: [What to do about old questions whose answers", "right word?) (Not sure whether this other question is relevant: [What to do", "glad if someone could please remind me what the conclusion was (it was", "we challenging the premise rather than answering the question (question on potential sexist", "(Is thread the right word?) (Not sure whether this other question is relevant:", "the following related Meta question, I apologize and would be glad if someone", "very* long thread): [Why are we challenging the premise rather than answering the", "its rewritten form (i.e. flag as \"not an answer\")? If not, what should,", "question in its rewritten form (i.e. flag as \"not an answer\")? If not,", "rewritten, but not before a number of answers were posted and discussed at", "me what the conclusion was (it was a very long thread): [Why are" ]
[ "there are two tags: [code](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/code) and [software](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/software). Could someone please explain what is", "and [software](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/software). Could someone please explain what is the difference between them? Wouldn't", "what is the difference between them? Wouldn't it make sense to merge them?", "are two tags: [code](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/code) and [software](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/software). Could someone please explain what is the", "two tags: [code](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/code) and [software](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/software). Could someone please explain what is the difference", "I've noticed that there are two tags: [code](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/code) and [software](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/software). Could someone please", "[software](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/software). Could someone please explain what is the difference between them? Wouldn't it", "tags: [code](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/code) and [software](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/software). Could someone please explain what is the difference between", "Could someone please explain what is the difference between them? Wouldn't it make", "that there are two tags: [code](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/code) and [software](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/software). Could someone please explain what", "please explain what is the difference between them? Wouldn't it make sense to", "noticed that there are two tags: [code](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/code) and [software](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/software). Could someone please explain", "[code](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/code) and [software](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/software). Could someone please explain what is the difference between them?", "someone please explain what is the difference between them? Wouldn't it make sense", "explain what is the difference between them? Wouldn't it make sense to merge" ]
[ "another user has posted an up-voted (5 at present) [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220) that contains new", "question [When referring to races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454), another", "'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454), another user has posted an up-voted (5 at present)", "has posted an up-voted (5 at present) [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220) that contains new information. Another", "should write it up as a separate answer but they have not done", "the question [When referring to races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454),", "[my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81220/12454) to the question [When referring to races, should 'black' and 'white'", "(MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454), another user has posted an up-voted (5 at present) [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220) that contains", "up as a separate answer but they have not done so to date", "write it up as a separate answer but they have not done so", "they have not done so to date (9 days later). Should I incorporate", "to the question [When referring to races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized?", "incorporate the information from the comment into my answer, giving proper credit to", "not done so to date (9 days later). Should I incorporate the information", "days later). Should I incorporate the information from the comment into my answer,", "should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454), another user has posted an up-voted", "has suggested that they should write it up as a separate answer but", "referring to races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454), another user has", "date (9 days later). Should I incorporate the information from the comment into", "(5 at present) [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220) that contains new information. Another user has suggested that", "comment into my answer, giving proper credit to it, or just leave it", "have not done so to date (9 days later). Should I incorporate the", "done so to date (9 days later). Should I incorporate the information from", "Another user has suggested that they should write it up as a separate", "answer but they have not done so to date (9 days later). Should", "new information. Another user has suggested that they should write it up as", "as a separate answer but they have not done so to date (9", "'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454), another user has posted an up-voted (5", "an up-voted (5 at present) [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220) that contains new information. Another user has", "contains new information. Another user has suggested that they should write it up", "Should I incorporate the information from the comment into my answer, giving proper", "but they have not done so to date (9 days later). Should I", "user has posted an up-voted (5 at present) [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220) that contains new information.", "[When referring to races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454), another user", "races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454), another user has posted an", "present) [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220) that contains new information. Another user has suggested that they should", "I incorporate the information from the comment into my answer, giving proper credit", "my answer, giving proper credit to it, or just leave it as it", "into my answer, giving proper credit to it, or just leave it as", "later). Should I incorporate the information from the comment into my answer, giving", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81220/12454) to the question [When referring to races, should 'black' and 'white' be", "it up as a separate answer but they have not done so to", "answer, giving proper credit to it, or just leave it as it is?", "and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454), another user has posted an up-voted (5 at", "information from the comment into my answer, giving proper credit to it, or", "that contains new information. Another user has suggested that they should write it", "be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454), another user has posted an up-voted (5 at present) [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220)", "separate answer but they have not done so to date (9 days later).", "from the comment into my answer, giving proper credit to it, or just", "to races, should 'black' and 'white' be capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454), another user has posted", "to date (9 days later). Should I incorporate the information from the comment", "the comment into my answer, giving proper credit to it, or just leave", "suggested that they should write it up as a separate answer but they", "On [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/81220/12454) to the question [When referring to races, should 'black' and", "capitalized? (MLA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81218/12454), another user has posted an up-voted (5 at present) [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220) that", "at present) [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220) that contains new information. Another user has suggested that they", "a separate answer but they have not done so to date (9 days", "so to date (9 days later). Should I incorporate the information from the", "the information from the comment into my answer, giving proper credit to it,", "user has suggested that they should write it up as a separate answer", "that they should write it up as a separate answer but they have", "(9 days later). Should I incorporate the information from the comment into my", "[comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220) that contains new information. Another user has suggested that they should write", "they should write it up as a separate answer but they have not", "information. Another user has suggested that they should write it up as a", "up-voted (5 at present) [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220) that contains new information. Another user has suggested", "posted an up-voted (5 at present) [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81218/when-referring-to-races-should-black-and-white-be-capitalized-mla/81220#comment201152_81220) that contains new information. Another user" ]
[ "SE sites, and isn't necessarily a problem for the sites if they are", "my decrease in activity here. It seems to me that this may be", "getting enough new active users (and may be a boon, if you're getting", "than some of the other sites (because there are a lot more possible", "asked here? (mostly duplicates/very specialized) Or is there any data for or against", "eventually peter off or questions will tend to become more and more specialized.", "of the other sites (because there are a lot more possible questions of", "changing developments). If this observation is true, then it seems likely that either", "getting less of me :). The above was sort of a disclaimer to", "will tend to become more and more specialized. First: > > Do other", "I don't claim to be an integral or representative user of this site,", "there anything we can or should try to do about it? > >", "this observation, which is my main worry: it seems to me that when", "as much lately. This is probably a natural phenomenon for many users across", "either duplicates (if not in the technical sense, at least morally so) or", "at least morally so) or about some specialized issue I am not so", "least morally so) or about some specialized issue I am not so interested", "for my decrease in activity here. It seems to me that this may", "> > Do other people see a similar issue with the questions being", "main worry: it seems to me that when I have been browsing new", "observation is true, then it seems likely that either usage (measured in some", "here. It seems to me that this may be more of an issue", "Or is there any data for or against this? (Surely we can get", "for or against this? (Surely we can get data about numbers of questions", "> Second: > > If this issue is in fact real, is there", "is probably a natural phenomenon for many users across the SE sites, and", "don't claim to be an integral or representative user of this site, but", "(and may be a boon, if you're getting less of me :). The", "by the growth of the site.) > > > Second: > > If", "get data about numbers of questions that are or aren't duplicates; being \"too", "of me :). The above was sort of a disclaimer to this observation,", "questions being asked here? (mostly duplicates/very specialized) Or is there any data for", "or questions will tend to become more and more specialized. First: > >", "specialized. First: > > Do other people see a similar issue with the", "of Academia(.SE): I don't claim to be an integral or representative user of", "could try to measure \"broad interest\" by counting question votes inversely scaled by", "a similar issue with the questions being asked here? (mostly duplicates/very specialized) Or", "measure \"broad interest\" by counting question votes inversely scaled by the growth of", "that are or aren't duplicates; being \"too specialized\" may be hard to measure", "I've noticed I personally haven't been using Academia as much lately. This is", "partially accounts for my decrease in activity here. It seems to me that", "here? (mostly duplicates/very specialized) Or is there any data for or against this?", "an integral or representative user of this site, but I've noticed I personally", "much lately. This is probably a natural phenomenon for many users across the", "to measure \"broad interest\" by counting question votes inversely scaled by the growth", "The above was sort of a disclaimer to this observation, which is my", "me that when I have been browsing new questions here, most of them", "or representative user of this site, but I've noticed I personally haven't been", "in some sense) of Academia will eventually peter off or questions will tend", "this partially accounts for my decrease in activity here. It seems to me", "(mostly duplicates/very specialized) Or is there any data for or against this? (Surely", "issue with the questions being asked here? (mostly duplicates/very specialized) Or is there", "questions that are or aren't duplicates; being \"too specialized\" may be hard to", "of an issue on Academia than some of the other sites (because there", "focused on changing developments). If this observation is true, then it seems likely", "a lot more possible questions of \"broad interest\" and/or questions are more focused", "been browsing new questions here, most of them are either duplicates (if not", "of \"broad interest\" and/or questions are more focused on changing developments). If this", "think this partially accounts for my decrease in activity here. It seems to", "being asked here? (mostly duplicates/very specialized) Or is there any data for or", "by counting question votes inversely scaled by the growth of the site.) >", "you're getting less of me :). The above was sort of a disclaimer", "votes inversely scaled by the growth of the site.) > > > Second:", "interest\" by counting question votes inversely scaled by the growth of the site.)", "duplicates; being \"too specialized\" may be hard to measure directly, but we could", "(because there are a lot more possible questions of \"broad interest\" and/or questions", "this observation is true, then it seems likely that either usage (measured in", "we can get data about numbers of questions that are or aren't duplicates;", "aren't duplicates; being \"too specialized\" may be hard to measure directly, but we", "that when I have been browsing new questions here, most of them are", "true, then it seems likely that either usage (measured in some sense) of", "directly, but we could try to measure \"broad interest\" by counting question votes", "site, but I've noticed I personally haven't been using Academia as much lately.", "duplicates (if not in the technical sense, at least morally so) or about", "seems likely that either usage (measured in some sense) of Academia will eventually", "here, most of them are either duplicates (if not in the technical sense,", "may be more of an issue on Academia than some of the other", "more focused on changing developments). If this observation is true, then it seems", "other people see a similar issue with the questions being asked here? (mostly", "data about numbers of questions that are or aren't duplicates; being \"too specialized\"", "technical sense, at least morally so) or about some specialized issue I am", "me that this may be more of an issue on Academia than some", "are or aren't duplicates; being \"too specialized\" may be hard to measure directly,", "scaled by the growth of the site.) > > > Second: > >", "data for or against this? (Surely we can get data about numbers of", "browsing new questions here, most of them are either duplicates (if not in", "some specialized issue I am not so interested in. I think this partially", "I have been browsing new questions here, most of them are either duplicates", "a disclaimer to this observation, which is my main worry: it seems to", "to me that this may be more of an issue on Academia than", "then it seems likely that either usage (measured in some sense) of Academia", "an issue on Academia than some of the other sites (because there are", "be a boon, if you're getting less of me :). The above was", "(measured in some sense) of Academia will eventually peter off or questions will", "the sites if they are getting enough new active users (and may be", "is my main worry: it seems to me that when I have been", "are more focused on changing developments). If this observation is true, then it", "this site, but I've noticed I personally haven't been using Academia as much", "I personally haven't been using Academia as much lately. This is probably a", "in fact real, is there anything we can or should try to do", "enough new active users (and may be a boon, if you're getting less", "of them are either duplicates (if not in the technical sense, at least", "more of an issue on Academia than some of the other sites (because", "Academia than some of the other sites (because there are a lot more", "on changing developments). If this observation is true, then it seems likely that", "that either usage (measured in some sense) of Academia will eventually peter off", "but we could try to measure \"broad interest\" by counting question votes inversely", "user of this site, but I've noticed I personally haven't been using Academia", "real, is there anything we can or should try to do about it?", "hard to measure directly, but we could try to measure \"broad interest\" by", "boon, if you're getting less of me :). The above was sort of", "tend to become more and more specialized. First: > > Do other people", "with the questions being asked here? (mostly duplicates/very specialized) Or is there any", "for many users across the SE sites, and isn't necessarily a problem for", "Do other people see a similar issue with the questions being asked here?", "I think this partially accounts for my decrease in activity here. It seems", "questions here, most of them are either duplicates (if not in the technical", "more possible questions of \"broad interest\" and/or questions are more focused on changing", "accounts for my decrease in activity here. It seems to me that this", "natural phenomenon for many users across the SE sites, and isn't necessarily a", "be an integral or representative user of this site, but I've noticed I", "of a disclaimer to this observation, which is my main worry: it seems", "are a lot more possible questions of \"broad interest\" and/or questions are more", "can get data about numbers of questions that are or aren't duplicates; being", "issue is in fact real, is there anything we can or should try", "worry: it seems to me that when I have been browsing new questions", "in activity here. It seems to me that this may be more of", "if they are getting enough new active users (and may be a boon,", "so) or about some specialized issue I am not so interested in. I", "site.) > > > Second: > > If this issue is in fact", "lot more possible questions of \"broad interest\" and/or questions are more focused on", "and more specialized. First: > > Do other people see a similar issue", "but I've noticed I personally haven't been using Academia as much lately. This", "> > If this issue is in fact real, is there anything we", "fact real, is there anything we can or should try to do about", "growth of the site.) > > > Second: > > If this issue", "other sites (because there are a lot more possible questions of \"broad interest\"", "noticed I personally haven't been using Academia as much lately. This is probably", "It seems to me that this may be more of an issue on", "duplicates/very specialized) Or is there any data for or against this? (Surely we", "the other sites (because there are a lot more possible questions of \"broad", "in. I think this partially accounts for my decrease in activity here. It", "them are either duplicates (if not in the technical sense, at least morally", "If this observation is true, then it seems likely that either usage (measured", "sense) of Academia will eventually peter off or questions will tend to become", "this? (Surely we can get data about numbers of questions that are or", "personally haven't been using Academia as much lately. This is probably a natural", "a natural phenomenon for many users across the SE sites, and isn't necessarily", "try to measure \"broad interest\" by counting question votes inversely scaled by the", "the questions being asked here? (mostly duplicates/very specialized) Or is there any data", "lately. This is probably a natural phenomenon for many users across the SE", "users (and may be a boon, if you're getting less of me :).", ":). The above was sort of a disclaimer to this observation, which is", "probably a natural phenomenon for many users across the SE sites, and isn't", "was sort of a disclaimer to this observation, which is my main worry:", "to me that when I have been browsing new questions here, most of", "and/or questions are more focused on changing developments). If this observation is true,", "is true, then it seems likely that either usage (measured in some sense)", "This is probably a natural phenomenon for many users across the SE sites,", "to measure directly, but we could try to measure \"broad interest\" by counting", "this may be more of an issue on Academia than some of the", "they are getting enough new active users (and may be a boon, if", "First: > > Do other people see a similar issue with the questions", "inversely scaled by the growth of the site.) > > > Second: >", "Academia(.SE): I don't claim to be an integral or representative user of this", "the site.) > > > Second: > > If this issue is in", "sort of a disclaimer to this observation, which is my main worry: it", "\"broad interest\" and/or questions are more focused on changing developments). If this observation", "about numbers of questions that are or aren't duplicates; being \"too specialized\" may", "disclaimer to this observation, which is my main worry: it seems to me", "of Academia will eventually peter off or questions will tend to become more", "specialized) Or is there any data for or against this? (Surely we can", "and isn't necessarily a problem for the sites if they are getting enough", "may be hard to measure directly, but we could try to measure \"broad", "\"broad interest\" by counting question votes inversely scaled by the growth of the", "questions are more focused on changing developments). If this observation is true, then", "possible questions of \"broad interest\" and/or questions are more focused on changing developments).", "representative user of this site, but I've noticed I personally haven't been using", "sites, and isn't necessarily a problem for the sites if they are getting", "be hard to measure directly, but we could try to measure \"broad interest\"", "integral or representative user of this site, but I've noticed I personally haven't", "are either duplicates (if not in the technical sense, at least morally so)", "interest\" and/or questions are more focused on changing developments). If this observation is", "> If this issue is in fact real, is there anything we can", "any data for or against this? (Surely we can get data about numbers", "claim to be an integral or representative user of this site, but I've", "question votes inversely scaled by the growth of the site.) > > >", "there are a lot more possible questions of \"broad interest\" and/or questions are", "across the SE sites, and isn't necessarily a problem for the sites if", "some of the other sites (because there are a lot more possible questions", "the growth of the site.) > > > Second: > > If this", "when I have been browsing new questions here, most of them are either", "it seems likely that either usage (measured in some sense) of Academia will", "more specialized. First: > > Do other people see a similar issue with", "of the site.) > > > Second: > > If this issue is", "interested in. I think this partially accounts for my decrease in activity here.", "to ponder on the future of Academia(.SE): I don't claim to be an", "(Surely we can get data about numbers of questions that are or aren't", "to be an integral or representative user of this site, but I've noticed", "a boon, if you're getting less of me :). The above was sort", "above was sort of a disclaimer to this observation, which is my main", "observation, which is my main worry: it seems to me that when I", "similar issue with the questions being asked here? (mostly duplicates/very specialized) Or is", "which is my main worry: it seems to me that when I have", "issue on Academia than some of the other sites (because there are a", "ponder on the future of Academia(.SE): I don't claim to be an integral", "some sense) of Academia will eventually peter off or questions will tend to", "see a similar issue with the questions being asked here? (mostly duplicates/very specialized)", "on Academia than some of the other sites (because there are a lot", "Academia as much lately. This is probably a natural phenomenon for many users", "for the sites if they are getting enough new active users (and may", "is there any data for or against this? (Surely we can get data", "against this? (Surely we can get data about numbers of questions that are", "on the future of Academia(.SE): I don't claim to be an integral or", "If this issue is in fact real, is there anything we can or", "of this site, but I've noticed I personally haven't been using Academia as", "many users across the SE sites, and isn't necessarily a problem for the", "\"too specialized\" may be hard to measure directly, but we could try to", "be more of an issue on Academia than some of the other sites", "people see a similar issue with the questions being asked here? (mostly duplicates/very", "about some specialized issue I am not so interested in. I think this", "off or questions will tend to become more and more specialized. First: >", "is there anything we can or should try to do about it? >", "to become more and more specialized. First: > > Do other people see", "in the technical sense, at least morally so) or about some specialized issue", "it seems to me that when I have been browsing new questions here,", "there any data for or against this? (Surely we can get data about", "using Academia as much lately. This is probably a natural phenomenon for many", "> > > Second: > > If this issue is in fact real,", "seems to me that this may be more of an issue on Academia", "phenomenon for many users across the SE sites, and isn't necessarily a problem", "or about some specialized issue I am not so interested in. I think", "or aren't duplicates; being \"too specialized\" may be hard to measure directly, but", "so interested in. I think this partially accounts for my decrease in activity", "new active users (and may be a boon, if you're getting less of", "me :). The above was sort of a disclaimer to this observation, which", "less of me :). The above was sort of a disclaimer to this", "likely that either usage (measured in some sense) of Academia will eventually peter", "been using Academia as much lately. This is probably a natural phenomenon for", "of questions that are or aren't duplicates; being \"too specialized\" may be hard", "or against this? (Surely we can get data about numbers of questions that", "counting question votes inversely scaled by the growth of the site.) > >", "problem for the sites if they are getting enough new active users (and", "haven't been using Academia as much lately. This is probably a natural phenomenon", "me to ponder on the future of Academia(.SE): I don't claim to be", "active users (and may be a boon, if you're getting less of me", "sense, at least morally so) or about some specialized issue I am not", "> Do other people see a similar issue with the questions being asked", "being \"too specialized\" may be hard to measure directly, but we could try", "this issue is in fact real, is there anything we can or should", "activity here. It seems to me that this may be more of an", "am not so interested in. I think this partially accounts for my decrease", "either usage (measured in some sense) of Academia will eventually peter off or", "decrease in activity here. It seems to me that this may be more", "isn't necessarily a problem for the sites if they are getting enough new", "will eventually peter off or questions will tend to become more and more", "peter off or questions will tend to become more and more specialized. First:", "questions will tend to become more and more specialized. First: > > Do", "more and more specialized. First: > > Do other people see a similar", "that this may be more of an issue on Academia than some of", "we could try to measure \"broad interest\" by counting question votes inversely scaled", "my main worry: it seems to me that when I have been browsing", "new questions here, most of them are either duplicates (if not in the", "Academia will eventually peter off or questions will tend to become more and", "seems to me that when I have been browsing new questions here, most", "is in fact real, is there anything we can or should try to", "the SE sites, and isn't necessarily a problem for the sites if they", "Second: > > If this issue is in fact real, is there anything", "necessarily a problem for the sites if they are getting enough new active", "the future of Academia(.SE): I don't claim to be an integral or representative", "numbers of questions that are or aren't duplicates; being \"too specialized\" may be", "(if not in the technical sense, at least morally so) or about some", "the technical sense, at least morally so) or about some specialized issue I", "morally so) or about some specialized issue I am not so interested in.", "not so interested in. I think this partially accounts for my decrease in", "anything we can or should try to do about it? > > >", "measure directly, but we could try to measure \"broad interest\" by counting question", "become more and more specialized. First: > > Do other people see a", "specialized\" may be hard to measure directly, but we could try to measure", "usage (measured in some sense) of Academia will eventually peter off or questions", "not in the technical sense, at least morally so) or about some specialized", "if you're getting less of me :). The above was sort of a", "may be a boon, if you're getting less of me :). The above", "future of Academia(.SE): I don't claim to be an integral or representative user", "Allow me to ponder on the future of Academia(.SE): I don't claim to", "sites if they are getting enough new active users (and may be a", "specialized issue I am not so interested in. I think this partially accounts", "to this observation, which is my main worry: it seems to me that", "issue I am not so interested in. I think this partially accounts for", "I am not so interested in. I think this partially accounts for my", "questions of \"broad interest\" and/or questions are more focused on changing developments). If", "> > Second: > > If this issue is in fact real, is", "have been browsing new questions here, most of them are either duplicates (if", "users across the SE sites, and isn't necessarily a problem for the sites", "most of them are either duplicates (if not in the technical sense, at", "are getting enough new active users (and may be a boon, if you're", "developments). If this observation is true, then it seems likely that either usage", "sites (because there are a lot more possible questions of \"broad interest\" and/or", "a problem for the sites if they are getting enough new active users" ]
[ "new answerers just want to chip in and tell the world their opinion", "the flow? Is there a \"second level of protection\", or something more radical", "Given that the question is already protected, and we cannot close it because", "question [What to do with a student coming to class in revealing clothing,", "written. Given that the question is already protected, and we cannot close it", "have written. Given that the question is already protected, and we cannot close", "and tell his higher-ups to take the matter off him. Yet, new answers", "this point, I believe that most of the new answerers just want to", "his higher-ups to take the matter off him. Yet, new answers keep flowing", "opinion but they haven't even read what the other people have written. Given", "16k views and 19 answers. I don't believe there is really 19 different", "is already protected, and we cannot close it because it is on-topic (and", "most of the new answerers just want to chip in and tell the", "answerers just want to chip in and tell the world their opinion but", "her to stop, tell the other students to control their hormones, and tell", "there is really 19 different things the OP can do in this situation.", "to class in revealing clothing, to the degree that it disrupts the teaching", "there a \"second level of protection\", or something more radical that we can", "three: tell her to stop, tell the other students to control their hormones,", "disrupts the teaching environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t) has attracted 16k views and 19 answers. I don't", "to chip in and tell the world their opinion but they haven't even", "clothing, to the degree that it disrupts the teaching environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t) has attracted 16k", "we cannot close it because it is on-topic (and it's actually a good", "protected, and we cannot close it because it is on-topic (and it's actually", "19 different things the OP can do in this situation. Actually I believe", "that it disrupts the teaching environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t) has attracted 16k views and 19 answers.", "Academia.SE), what else can we do to stop the flow? Is there a", "has attracted 16k views and 19 answers. I don't believe there is really", "actually a good question for Academia.SE), what else can we do to stop", "in this situation. Actually I believe there's three: tell her to stop, tell", "to control their hormones, and tell his higher-ups to take the matter off", "control their hormones, and tell his higher-ups to take the matter off him.", "OP can do in this situation. Actually I believe there's three: tell her", "have noticed, the question [What to do with a student coming to class", "new answers keep flowing in. At this point, I believe that most of", "situation. Actually I believe there's three: tell her to stop, tell the other", "a student coming to class in revealing clothing, to the degree that it", "hormones, and tell his higher-ups to take the matter off him. Yet, new", "and tell the world their opinion but they haven't even read what the", "tell his higher-ups to take the matter off him. Yet, new answers keep", "can do in this situation. Actually I believe there's three: tell her to", "the other people have written. Given that the question is already protected, and", "tell her to stop, tell the other students to control their hormones, and", "stop the flow? Is there a \"second level of protection\", or something more", "environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t) has attracted 16k views and 19 answers. I don't believe there is", "flowing in. At this point, I believe that most of the new answerers", "to do with a student coming to class in revealing clothing, to the", "else can we do to stop the flow? Is there a \"second level", "point, I believe that most of the new answerers just want to chip", "\"second level of protection\", or something more radical that we can do to", "other people have written. Given that the question is already protected, and we", "we do to stop the flow? Is there a \"second level of protection\",", "answers? Or maybe the SE philosophy is \"let them answer and downvote them\"?", "don't believe there is really 19 different things the OP can do in", "(and it's actually a good question for Academia.SE), what else can we do", "noticed, the question [What to do with a student coming to class in", "to stop the flow? Is there a \"second level of protection\", or something", "the teaching environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t) has attracted 16k views and 19 answers. I don't believe", "already protected, and we cannot close it because it is on-topic (and it's", "flow of answers? Or maybe the SE philosophy is \"let them answer and", "the world their opinion but they haven't even read what the other people", "the flow of answers? Or maybe the SE philosophy is \"let them answer", "believe that most of the new answerers just want to chip in and", "world their opinion but they haven't even read what the other people have", "because it is on-topic (and it's actually a good question for Academia.SE), what", "and we cannot close it because it is on-topic (and it's actually a", "do in this situation. Actually I believe there's three: tell her to stop,", "[What to do with a student coming to class in revealing clothing, to", "I believe that most of the new answerers just want to chip in", "this situation. Actually I believe there's three: tell her to stop, tell the", "answers keep flowing in. At this point, I believe that most of the", "Actually I believe there's three: tell her to stop, tell the other students", "tell the other students to control their hormones, and tell his higher-ups to", "tell the world their opinion but they haven't even read what the other", "even read what the other people have written. Given that the question is", "students to control their hormones, and tell his higher-ups to take the matter", "class in revealing clothing, to the degree that it disrupts the teaching environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t)", "do with a student coming to class in revealing clothing, to the degree", "the matter off him. Yet, new answers keep flowing in. At this point,", "good question for Academia.SE), what else can we do to stop the flow?", "in. At this point, I believe that most of the new answerers just", "their opinion but they haven't even read what the other people have written.", "in revealing clothing, to the degree that it disrupts the teaching environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t) has", "just want to chip in and tell the world their opinion but they", "I believe there's three: tell her to stop, tell the other students to", "of answers? Or maybe the SE philosophy is \"let them answer and downvote", "of protection\", or something more radical that we can do to stop the", "can do to stop the flow of answers? Or maybe the SE philosophy", "read what the other people have written. Given that the question is already", "the other students to control their hormones, and tell his higher-ups to take", "level of protection\", or something more radical that we can do to stop", "the degree that it disrupts the teaching environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t) has attracted 16k views and", "views and 19 answers. I don't believe there is really 19 different things", "to stop, tell the other students to control their hormones, and tell his", "radical that we can do to stop the flow of answers? Or maybe", "there's three: tell her to stop, tell the other students to control their", "him. Yet, new answers keep flowing in. At this point, I believe that", "for Academia.SE), what else can we do to stop the flow? Is there", "answers. I don't believe there is really 19 different things the OP can", "is really 19 different things the OP can do in this situation. Actually", "coming to class in revealing clothing, to the degree that it disrupts the", "to the degree that it disrupts the teaching environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t) has attracted 16k views", "degree that it disrupts the teaching environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t) has attracted 16k views and 19", "believe there is really 19 different things the OP can do in this", "At this point, I believe that most of the new answerers just want", "that most of the new answerers just want to chip in and tell", "teaching environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t) has attracted 16k views and 19 answers. I don't believe there", "the question [What to do with a student coming to class in revealing", "haven't even read what the other people have written. Given that the question", "their hormones, and tell his higher-ups to take the matter off him. Yet,", "the question is already protected, and we cannot close it because it is", "it is on-topic (and it's actually a good question for Academia.SE), what else", "the new answerers just want to chip in and tell the world their", "it's actually a good question for Academia.SE), what else can we do to", "believe there's three: tell her to stop, tell the other students to control", "keep flowing in. At this point, I believe that most of the new", "19 answers. I don't believe there is really 19 different things the OP", "in and tell the world their opinion but they haven't even read what", "a good question for Academia.SE), what else can we do to stop the", "people have written. Given that the question is already protected, and we cannot", "they haven't even read what the other people have written. Given that the", "and 19 answers. I don't believe there is really 19 different things the", "to stop the flow of answers? Or maybe the SE philosophy is \"let", "it because it is on-topic (and it's actually a good question for Academia.SE),", "chip in and tell the world their opinion but they haven't even read", "Is there a \"second level of protection\", or something more radical that we", "flow? Is there a \"second level of protection\", or something more radical that", "revealing clothing, to the degree that it disrupts the teaching environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t) has attracted", "As you probably have noticed, the question [What to do with a student", "with a student coming to class in revealing clothing, to the degree that", "protection\", or something more radical that we can do to stop the flow", "we can do to stop the flow of answers? Or maybe the SE", "cannot close it because it is on-topic (and it's actually a good question", "on-topic (and it's actually a good question for Academia.SE), what else can we", "want to chip in and tell the world their opinion but they haven't", "really 19 different things the OP can do in this situation. Actually I", "it disrupts the teaching environment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83082/what-to-do-with-a-student-coming-to-class-in-revealing-clothing-to-the-degree-t) has attracted 16k views and 19 answers. I", "attracted 16k views and 19 answers. I don't believe there is really 19", "do to stop the flow of answers? Or maybe the SE philosophy is", "question is already protected, and we cannot close it because it is on-topic", "different things the OP can do in this situation. Actually I believe there's", "you probably have noticed, the question [What to do with a student coming", "what else can we do to stop the flow? Is there a \"second", "that the question is already protected, and we cannot close it because it", "other students to control their hormones, and tell his higher-ups to take the", "do to stop the flow? Is there a \"second level of protection\", or", "that we can do to stop the flow of answers? Or maybe the", "stop, tell the other students to control their hormones, and tell his higher-ups", "something more radical that we can do to stop the flow of answers?", "is on-topic (and it's actually a good question for Academia.SE), what else can", "to take the matter off him. Yet, new answers keep flowing in. At", "more radical that we can do to stop the flow of answers? Or", "things the OP can do in this situation. Actually I believe there's three:", "of the new answerers just want to chip in and tell the world", "I don't believe there is really 19 different things the OP can do", "matter off him. Yet, new answers keep flowing in. At this point, I", "stop the flow of answers? Or maybe the SE philosophy is \"let them", "higher-ups to take the matter off him. Yet, new answers keep flowing in.", "question for Academia.SE), what else can we do to stop the flow? Is", "close it because it is on-topic (and it's actually a good question for", "a \"second level of protection\", or something more radical that we can do", "Yet, new answers keep flowing in. At this point, I believe that most", "what the other people have written. Given that the question is already protected,", "student coming to class in revealing clothing, to the degree that it disrupts", "off him. Yet, new answers keep flowing in. At this point, I believe", "take the matter off him. Yet, new answers keep flowing in. At this", "probably have noticed, the question [What to do with a student coming to", "can we do to stop the flow? Is there a \"second level of", "the OP can do in this situation. Actually I believe there's three: tell", "but they haven't even read what the other people have written. Given that", "or something more radical that we can do to stop the flow of" ]
[ "is taking, I wanted to discuss the possibility of changing one of our", "class\" for which we now have a comprehensive set of answers. In a", "to all the questions along the line of \"someone stole my work/my GPA", "to discuss the possibility of changing one of our current habit, which is", "good practice when designing a study. We might then benefit from a \"study-design\"", "a simulator without comparing it with the actual tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to) Yes these questions are", "few examples: [Creating a research questionnaire with repeating sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections) [What tradeoffs are there", "our current habit, which is to close \"technical\" questions as off-topic. While some", "to this site it would be great to leverage that knowledge. Also, it", "site it would be great to leverage that knowledge. Also, it would be", "so great how do I still get into grad school/something mildly entertaining happened", "an algorithm, some are actually effectively about the academic process. One example are", "and external validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity) [Is it possible to \"validate\" a simulator without comparing it", "about the content of an algorithm, some are actually effectively about the academic", "which is to close \"technical\" questions as off-topic. While some are clear cuts,", "it would be a refreshing change to all the questions along the line", "for which we now have a comprehensive set of answers. In a typical", "leverage that knowledge. Also, it would be a refreshing change to all the", "the academic process. One example are questions pertaining to good practice when designing", "be great to leverage that knowledge. Also, it would be a refreshing change", "close \"technical\" questions as off-topic. While some are clear cuts, say someone asking", "I still get into grad school/something mildly entertaining happened in class\" for which", "designing a study. We might then benefit from a \"study-design\" tag. A few", "from a \"study-design\" tag. A few examples: [Creating a research questionnaire with repeating", "examples: [Creating a research questionnaire with repeating sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections) [What tradeoffs are there between", "of \"someone stole my work/my GPA is not so great how do I", "stole my work/my GPA is not so great how do I still get", "which we now have a comprehensive set of answers. In a typical meta", "example are questions pertaining to good practice when designing a study. We might", "a \"study-design\" tag. A few examples: [Creating a research questionnaire with repeating sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections)", "the content of an algorithm, some are actually effectively about the academic process.", "In a typical meta fashion, vote this question up if you're in favor,", "a study. We might then benefit from a \"study-design\" tag. A few examples:", "questions as off-topic. While some are clear cuts, say someone asking about the", "process. One example are questions pertaining to good practice when designing a study.", "a research questionnaire with repeating sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections) [What tradeoffs are there between internal and", "happened in class\" for which we now have a comprehensive set of answers.", "then benefit from a \"study-design\" tag. A few examples: [Creating a research questionnaire", "of an algorithm, some are actually effectively about the academic process. One example", "actual tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to) Yes these questions are field-specific, but a lot of the existing", "to good practice when designing a study. We might then benefit from a", "are actually effectively about the academic process. One example are questions pertaining to", "capable of dealing with that. with the pool of clever and successful academics", "successful academics participating to this site it would be great to leverage that", "sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections) [What tradeoffs are there between internal and external validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity) [Is it possible", "\"study-design\" tag. A few examples: [Creating a research questionnaire with repeating sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections) [What", "the existing one are as well. Apparently we're capable of dealing with that.", "get into grad school/something mildly entertaining happened in class\" for which we now", "as off-topic. While some are clear cuts, say someone asking about the content", "now have a comprehensive set of answers. In a typical meta fashion, vote", "pertaining to good practice when designing a study. We might then benefit from", "along the line of \"someone stole my work/my GPA is not so great", "site is taking, I wanted to discuss the possibility of changing one of", "about the direction this site is taking, I wanted to discuss the possibility", "a comprehensive set of answers. In a typical meta fashion, vote this question", "into grad school/something mildly entertaining happened in class\" for which we now have", "clever and successful academics participating to this site it would be great to", "school/something mildly entertaining happened in class\" for which we now have a comprehensive", "actually effectively about the academic process. One example are questions pertaining to good", "internal and external validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity) [Is it possible to \"validate\" a simulator without comparing", "well. Apparently we're capable of dealing with that. with the pool of clever", "of changing one of our current habit, which is to close \"technical\" questions", "are there between internal and external validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity) [Is it possible to \"validate\" a", "off-topic. While some are clear cuts, say someone asking about the content of", "to \"validate\" a simulator without comparing it with the actual tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to) Yes these", "that knowledge. Also, it would be a refreshing change to all the questions", "effectively about the academic process. One example are questions pertaining to good practice", "pool of clever and successful academics participating to this site it would be", "[a recent meta post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3616/how-sustainable-is-academia-se) wondering about the direction this site is taking, I", "it would be great to leverage that knowledge. Also, it would be a", "[Creating a research questionnaire with repeating sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections) [What tradeoffs are there between internal", "asking about the content of an algorithm, some are actually effectively about the", "work/my GPA is not so great how do I still get into grad", "one are as well. Apparently we're capable of dealing with that. with the", "this site is taking, I wanted to discuss the possibility of changing one", "possible to \"validate\" a simulator without comparing it with the actual tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to) Yes", "the pool of clever and successful academics participating to this site it would", "external validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity) [Is it possible to \"validate\" a simulator without comparing it with", "with the actual tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to) Yes these questions are field-specific, but a lot of", "knowledge. Also, it would be a refreshing change to all the questions along", "questions are field-specific, but a lot of the existing one are as well.", "wanted to discuss the possibility of changing one of our current habit, which", "discuss the possibility of changing one of our current habit, which is to", "benefit from a \"study-design\" tag. A few examples: [Creating a research questionnaire with", "this site it would be great to leverage that knowledge. Also, it would", "meta post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3616/how-sustainable-is-academia-se) wondering about the direction this site is taking, I wanted to", "would be great to leverage that knowledge. Also, it would be a refreshing", "typical meta fashion, vote this question up if you're in favor, down if", "While some are clear cuts, say someone asking about the content of an", "a refreshing change to all the questions along the line of \"someone stole", "the line of \"someone stole my work/my GPA is not so great how", "recent meta post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3616/how-sustainable-is-academia-se) wondering about the direction this site is taking, I wanted", "are as well. Apparently we're capable of dealing with that. with the pool", "One example are questions pertaining to good practice when designing a study. We", "up [a recent meta post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3616/how-sustainable-is-academia-se) wondering about the direction this site is taking,", "possibility of changing one of our current habit, which is to close \"technical\"", "validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity) [Is it possible to \"validate\" a simulator without comparing it with the", "comprehensive set of answers. In a typical meta fashion, vote this question up", "of clever and successful academics participating to this site it would be great", "clear cuts, say someone asking about the content of an algorithm, some are", "with that. with the pool of clever and successful academics participating to this", "academic process. One example are questions pertaining to good practice when designing a", "We might then benefit from a \"study-design\" tag. A few examples: [Creating a", "current habit, which is to close \"technical\" questions as off-topic. While some are", "questions pertaining to good practice when designing a study. We might then benefit", "one of our current habit, which is to close \"technical\" questions as off-topic.", "habit, which is to close \"technical\" questions as off-topic. While some are clear", "to leverage that knowledge. Also, it would be a refreshing change to all", "is to close \"technical\" questions as off-topic. While some are clear cuts, say", "meta fashion, vote this question up if you're in favor, down if you're", "\"technical\" questions as off-topic. While some are clear cuts, say someone asking about", "\"validate\" a simulator without comparing it with the actual tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to) Yes these questions", "refreshing change to all the questions along the line of \"someone stole my", "are field-specific, but a lot of the existing one are as well. Apparently", "in class\" for which we now have a comprehensive set of answers. In", "existing one are as well. Apparently we're capable of dealing with that. with", "questionnaire with repeating sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections) [What tradeoffs are there between internal and external validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity)", "questions along the line of \"someone stole my work/my GPA is not so", "field-specific, but a lot of the existing one are as well. Apparently we're", "great to leverage that knowledge. Also, it would be a refreshing change to", "as well. Apparently we're capable of dealing with that. with the pool of", "with repeating sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections) [What tradeoffs are there between internal and external validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity) [Is", "it possible to \"validate\" a simulator without comparing it with the actual tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to)", "of our current habit, which is to close \"technical\" questions as off-topic. While", "about the academic process. One example are questions pertaining to good practice when", "these questions are field-specific, but a lot of the existing one are as", "Apparently we're capable of dealing with that. with the pool of clever and", "direction this site is taking, I wanted to discuss the possibility of changing", "some are clear cuts, say someone asking about the content of an algorithm,", "someone asking about the content of an algorithm, some are actually effectively about", "taking, I wanted to discuss the possibility of changing one of our current", "it with the actual tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to) Yes these questions are field-specific, but a lot", "that. with the pool of clever and successful academics participating to this site", "set of answers. In a typical meta fashion, vote this question up if", "be a refreshing change to all the questions along the line of \"someone", "research questionnaire with repeating sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections) [What tradeoffs are there between internal and external", "the actual tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to) Yes these questions are field-specific, but a lot of the", "of the existing one are as well. Apparently we're capable of dealing with", "practice when designing a study. We might then benefit from a \"study-design\" tag.", "participating to this site it would be great to leverage that knowledge. Also,", "Yes these questions are field-specific, but a lot of the existing one are", "when designing a study. We might then benefit from a \"study-design\" tag. A", "tag. A few examples: [Creating a research questionnaire with repeating sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections) [What tradeoffs", "a lot of the existing one are as well. Apparently we're capable of", "might then benefit from a \"study-design\" tag. A few examples: [Creating a research", "with the pool of clever and successful academics participating to this site it", "say someone asking about the content of an algorithm, some are actually effectively", "lot of the existing one are as well. Apparently we're capable of dealing", "algorithm, some are actually effectively about the academic process. One example are questions", "not so great how do I still get into grad school/something mildly entertaining", "mildly entertaining happened in class\" for which we now have a comprehensive set", "is not so great how do I still get into grad school/something mildly", "[What tradeoffs are there between internal and external validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity) [Is it possible to", "between internal and external validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity) [Is it possible to \"validate\" a simulator without", "wondering about the direction this site is taking, I wanted to discuss the", "line of \"someone stole my work/my GPA is not so great how do", "do I still get into grad school/something mildly entertaining happened in class\" for", "are clear cuts, say someone asking about the content of an algorithm, some", "of answers. In a typical meta fashion, vote this question up if you're", "without comparing it with the actual tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to) Yes these questions are field-specific, but", "entertaining happened in class\" for which we now have a comprehensive set of", "change to all the questions along the line of \"someone stole my work/my", "answers. In a typical meta fashion, vote this question up if you're in", "academics participating to this site it would be great to leverage that knowledge.", "Following up [a recent meta post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3616/how-sustainable-is-academia-se) wondering about the direction this site is", "I wanted to discuss the possibility of changing one of our current habit,", "comparing it with the actual tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to) Yes these questions are field-specific, but a", "my work/my GPA is not so great how do I still get into", "the direction this site is taking, I wanted to discuss the possibility of", "tradeoffs are there between internal and external validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity) [Is it possible to \"validate\"", "there between internal and external validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity) [Is it possible to \"validate\" a simulator", "simulator without comparing it with the actual tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to) Yes these questions are field-specific,", "we now have a comprehensive set of answers. In a typical meta fashion,", "repeating sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections) [What tradeoffs are there between internal and external validity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59212/what-tradeoffs-are-there-between-internal-and-external-validity) [Is it", "some are actually effectively about the academic process. One example are questions pertaining", "cuts, say someone asking about the content of an algorithm, some are actually", "[Is it possible to \"validate\" a simulator without comparing it with the actual", "all the questions along the line of \"someone stole my work/my GPA is", "have a comprehensive set of answers. In a typical meta fashion, vote this", "of dealing with that. with the pool of clever and successful academics participating", "\"someone stole my work/my GPA is not so great how do I still", "we're capable of dealing with that. with the pool of clever and successful", "dealing with that. with the pool of clever and successful academics participating to", "how do I still get into grad school/something mildly entertaining happened in class\"", "tool?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73432/is-it-possible-to-validate-a-simulator-without-comparing-it-with-the-actual-to) Yes these questions are field-specific, but a lot of the existing one", "grad school/something mildly entertaining happened in class\" for which we now have a", "Also, it would be a refreshing change to all the questions along the", "but a lot of the existing one are as well. Apparently we're capable", "would be a refreshing change to all the questions along the line of", "content of an algorithm, some are actually effectively about the academic process. One", "post](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3616/how-sustainable-is-academia-se) wondering about the direction this site is taking, I wanted to discuss", "the questions along the line of \"someone stole my work/my GPA is not", "to close \"technical\" questions as off-topic. While some are clear cuts, say someone", "and successful academics participating to this site it would be great to leverage", "fashion, vote this question up if you're in favor, down if you're against.", "still get into grad school/something mildly entertaining happened in class\" for which we", "study. We might then benefit from a \"study-design\" tag. A few examples: [Creating", "changing one of our current habit, which is to close \"technical\" questions as", "great how do I still get into grad school/something mildly entertaining happened in", "A few examples: [Creating a research questionnaire with repeating sections](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18675/creating-a-research-questionnaire-with-repeating-sections) [What tradeoffs are", "are questions pertaining to good practice when designing a study. We might then", "a typical meta fashion, vote this question up if you're in favor, down", "GPA is not so great how do I still get into grad school/something", "the possibility of changing one of our current habit, which is to close" ]
[ "for articles or sites for research on a thread for academia. To me", "someone ask a question regarding research in academia without being accused of \"shopping\"?", "academia. To me it seems that academia has become a group of self", "No. Academia is filled with hypocritical tyrants. End Rant. Ban me if necessary,", "on a thread for academia. To me it seems that academia has become", "seem to be a reasonable conclusion to post a question asking for articles", "that covers many topics with education. Dedicated to research, education, and scholarship. So", "me if necessary, put the post on hold or close it. It will", "necessary, put the post on hold or close it. It will only prove", "filled with pedagogues? No. Academia is filled with hypocritical tyrants. End Rant. Ban", "who has a question unless it fit into \"their mold\". So is academia", "filled with hypocritical tyrants. End Rant. Ban me if necessary, put the post", "thread for academia. To me it seems that academia has become a group", "regarding research in academia without being accused of \"shopping\"? To my knowledge, academia", "to post a question asking for articles or sites for research on a", "articles or sites for research on a thread for academia. To me it", "asking for articles or sites for research on a thread for academia. To", "academia is a broad category that covers many topics with education. Dedicated to", "is a broad category that covers many topics with education. Dedicated to research,", "conclusion to post a question asking for articles or sites for research on", "knowledge, academia is a broad category that covers many topics with education. Dedicated", "research in academia without being accused of \"shopping\"? To my knowledge, academia is", "a question unless it fit into \"their mold\". So is academia filled with", "ask a question regarding research in academia without being accused of \"shopping\"? To", "with pedagogues? No. Academia is filled with hypocritical tyrants. End Rant. Ban me", "sites for research on a thread for academia. To me it seems that", "become a group of self righteous, condescending, tyrants who refuse to help anyone", "to research, education, and scholarship. So it would seem to be a reasonable", "if necessary, put the post on hold or close it. It will only", "is filled with hypocritical tyrants. End Rant. Ban me if necessary, put the", "anyone who has a question unless it fit into \"their mold\". So is", "Dedicated to research, education, and scholarship. So it would seem to be a", "\"shopping\"? To my knowledge, academia is a broad category that covers many topics", "to be a reasonable conclusion to post a question asking for articles or", "righteous, condescending, tyrants who refuse to help anyone who has a question unless", "be a reasonable conclusion to post a question asking for articles or sites", "pedagogues? No. Academia is filled with hypocritical tyrants. End Rant. Ban me if", "education. Dedicated to research, education, and scholarship. So it would seem to be", "of \"shopping\"? To my knowledge, academia is a broad category that covers many", "to help anyone who has a question unless it fit into \"their mold\".", "a thread for academia. To me it seems that academia has become a", "Ban me if necessary, put the post on hold or close it. It", "who refuse to help anyone who has a question unless it fit into", "question asking for articles or sites for research on a thread for academia.", "question unless it fit into \"their mold\". So is academia filled with pedagogues?", "into \"their mold\". So is academia filled with pedagogues? No. Academia is filled", "a reasonable conclusion to post a question asking for articles or sites for", "reasonable conclusion to post a question asking for articles or sites for research", "with education. Dedicated to research, education, and scholarship. So it would seem to", "So it would seem to be a reasonable conclusion to post a question", "research on a thread for academia. To me it seems that academia has", "End Rant. Ban me if necessary, put the post on hold or close", "and scholarship. So it would seem to be a reasonable conclusion to post", "tyrants. End Rant. Ban me if necessary, put the post on hold or", "academia has become a group of self righteous, condescending, tyrants who refuse to", "a question asking for articles or sites for research on a thread for", "put the post on hold or close it. It will only prove my", "academia filled with pedagogues? No. Academia is filled with hypocritical tyrants. End Rant.", "question regarding research in academia without being accused of \"shopping\"? To my knowledge,", "condescending, tyrants who refuse to help anyone who has a question unless it", "would seem to be a reasonable conclusion to post a question asking for", "a broad category that covers many topics with education. Dedicated to research, education,", "self righteous, condescending, tyrants who refuse to help anyone who has a question", "of self righteous, condescending, tyrants who refuse to help anyone who has a", "being accused of \"shopping\"? To my knowledge, academia is a broad category that", "hypocritical tyrants. End Rant. Ban me if necessary, put the post on hold", "group of self righteous, condescending, tyrants who refuse to help anyone who has", "a group of self righteous, condescending, tyrants who refuse to help anyone who", "research, education, and scholarship. So it would seem to be a reasonable conclusion", "broad category that covers many topics with education. Dedicated to research, education, and", "without being accused of \"shopping\"? To my knowledge, academia is a broad category", "with hypocritical tyrants. End Rant. Ban me if necessary, put the post on", "post on hold or close it. It will only prove my point more.", "it seems that academia has become a group of self righteous, condescending, tyrants", "in academia without being accused of \"shopping\"? To my knowledge, academia is a", "for research on a thread for academia. To me it seems that academia", "seems that academia has become a group of self righteous, condescending, tyrants who", "the post on hold or close it. It will only prove my point", "Rant. Ban me if necessary, put the post on hold or close it.", "my knowledge, academia is a broad category that covers many topics with education.", "So is academia filled with pedagogues? No. Academia is filled with hypocritical tyrants.", "scholarship. So it would seem to be a reasonable conclusion to post a", "mold\". So is academia filled with pedagogues? No. Academia is filled with hypocritical", "me it seems that academia has become a group of self righteous, condescending,", "topics with education. Dedicated to research, education, and scholarship. So it would seem", "To my knowledge, academia is a broad category that covers many topics with", "unless it fit into \"their mold\". So is academia filled with pedagogues? No.", "has become a group of self righteous, condescending, tyrants who refuse to help", "accused of \"shopping\"? To my knowledge, academia is a broad category that covers", "refuse to help anyone who has a question unless it fit into \"their", "that academia has become a group of self righteous, condescending, tyrants who refuse", "academia without being accused of \"shopping\"? To my knowledge, academia is a broad", "can someone ask a question regarding research in academia without being accused of", "a question regarding research in academia without being accused of \"shopping\"? To my", "for academia. To me it seems that academia has become a group of", "it fit into \"their mold\". So is academia filled with pedagogues? No. Academia", "is academia filled with pedagogues? No. Academia is filled with hypocritical tyrants. End", "covers many topics with education. Dedicated to research, education, and scholarship. So it", "To me it seems that academia has become a group of self righteous,", "tyrants who refuse to help anyone who has a question unless it fit", "many topics with education. Dedicated to research, education, and scholarship. So it would", "education, and scholarship. So it would seem to be a reasonable conclusion to", "post a question asking for articles or sites for research on a thread", "help anyone who has a question unless it fit into \"their mold\". So", "category that covers many topics with education. Dedicated to research, education, and scholarship.", "fit into \"their mold\". So is academia filled with pedagogues? No. Academia is", "How can someone ask a question regarding research in academia without being accused", "\"their mold\". So is academia filled with pedagogues? No. Academia is filled with", "Academia is filled with hypocritical tyrants. End Rant. Ban me if necessary, put", "has a question unless it fit into \"their mold\". So is academia filled", "it would seem to be a reasonable conclusion to post a question asking", "or sites for research on a thread for academia. To me it seems" ]
[ "will be offended by something somewhere, someday, even if we don't intend it.", "to people asking about addressing potential cases of sexism. Everyone seems to put", "why there is intense focus on not offending people? Sure, people should not", "would like to know why there is intense focus on not offending people?", "non-offensive to anyone, above figuring out how the original issue can be solved.", "know why there is intense focus on not offending people? Sure, people should", "I have seen this occur in everything from questions ranging from professors asking", "put being non-offensive to anyone, above figuring out how the original issue can", "should not go about intentionally offending people, but someone will be offended by", "about intentionally offending people, but someone will be offended by something somewhere, someday,", "intense focus on not offending people? Sure, people should not go about intentionally", "have seen this occur in everything from questions ranging from professors asking how", "how to discipline their students, to people asking about addressing potential cases of", "everything from questions ranging from professors asking how to discipline their students, to", "someone will be offended by something somewhere, someday, even if we don't intend", "even if we don't intend it. I have seen this occur in everything", "ranging from professors asking how to discipline their students, to people asking about", "in everything from questions ranging from professors asking how to discipline their students,", "go about intentionally offending people, but someone will be offended by something somewhere,", "like to know why there is intense focus on not offending people? Sure,", "offending people, but someone will be offended by something somewhere, someday, even if", "professors asking how to discipline their students, to people asking about addressing potential", "sexism. Everyone seems to put being non-offensive to anyone, above figuring out how", "something somewhere, someday, even if we don't intend it. I have seen this", "focus on not offending people? Sure, people should not go about intentionally offending", "someday, even if we don't intend it. I have seen this occur in", "seen this occur in everything from questions ranging from professors asking how to", "discipline their students, to people asking about addressing potential cases of sexism. Everyone", "to know why there is intense focus on not offending people? Sure, people", "by something somewhere, someday, even if we don't intend it. I have seen", "to anyone, above figuring out how the original issue can be solved. [Example", "not go about intentionally offending people, but someone will be offended by something", "from questions ranging from professors asking how to discipline their students, to people", "potential cases of sexism. Everyone seems to put being non-offensive to anyone, above", "is intense focus on not offending people? Sure, people should not go about", "occur in everything from questions ranging from professors asking how to discipline their", "people should not go about intentionally offending people, but someone will be offended", "of sexism. Everyone seems to put being non-offensive to anyone, above figuring out", "people? Sure, people should not go about intentionally offending people, but someone will", "being non-offensive to anyone, above figuring out how the original issue can be", "anyone, above figuring out how the original issue can be solved. [Example answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/83655/63231)", "intentionally offending people, but someone will be offended by something somewhere, someday, even", "don't intend it. I have seen this occur in everything from questions ranging", "their students, to people asking about addressing potential cases of sexism. Everyone seems", "questions ranging from professors asking how to discipline their students, to people asking", "Sure, people should not go about intentionally offending people, but someone will be", "students, to people asking about addressing potential cases of sexism. Everyone seems to", "seems to put being non-offensive to anyone, above figuring out how the original", "this occur in everything from questions ranging from professors asking how to discipline", "there is intense focus on not offending people? Sure, people should not go", "offended by something somewhere, someday, even if we don't intend it. I have", "asking about addressing potential cases of sexism. Everyone seems to put being non-offensive", "Everyone seems to put being non-offensive to anyone, above figuring out how the", "from professors asking how to discipline their students, to people asking about addressing", "asking how to discipline their students, to people asking about addressing potential cases", "on not offending people? Sure, people should not go about intentionally offending people,", "we don't intend it. I have seen this occur in everything from questions", "if we don't intend it. I have seen this occur in everything from", "to discipline their students, to people asking about addressing potential cases of sexism.", "people, but someone will be offended by something somewhere, someday, even if we", "it. I have seen this occur in everything from questions ranging from professors", "be offended by something somewhere, someday, even if we don't intend it. I", "somewhere, someday, even if we don't intend it. I have seen this occur", "offending people? Sure, people should not go about intentionally offending people, but someone", "intend it. I have seen this occur in everything from questions ranging from", "to put being non-offensive to anyone, above figuring out how the original issue", "people asking about addressing potential cases of sexism. Everyone seems to put being", "about addressing potential cases of sexism. Everyone seems to put being non-offensive to", "addressing potential cases of sexism. Everyone seems to put being non-offensive to anyone,", "cases of sexism. Everyone seems to put being non-offensive to anyone, above figuring", "I would like to know why there is intense focus on not offending", "not offending people? Sure, people should not go about intentionally offending people, but", "but someone will be offended by something somewhere, someday, even if we don't" ]
[ "Meta [outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436) of reasons for bumping, and none of them fit. I thought", "maybe the bump had resulted from an edit, but the question doesn't seem", "them fit. I thought that maybe the bump had resulted from an edit,", "sense to me. I read a Meta [outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436) of reasons for bumping, and", "the homepage by Community. Was this done automatically by the software? Was it", "automatically by the software? Was it a person? Why was it bumped? It", "Community. Was this done automatically by the software? Was it a person? Why", "fit. I thought that maybe the bump had resulted from an edit, but", "thought that maybe the bump had resulted from an edit, but the question", "A particular old [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77464/32436) was bumped to the homepage by Community. Was this", "old [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77464/32436) was bumped to the homepage by Community. Was this done automatically", "had resulted from an edit, but the question doesn't seem to have been", "the software? Was it a person? Why was it bumped? It makes no", "particular old [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77464/32436) was bumped to the homepage by Community. Was this done", "bump had resulted from an edit, but the question doesn't seem to have", "to me. I read a Meta [outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436) of reasons for bumping, and none", "of reasons for bumping, and none of them fit. I thought that maybe", "It makes no sense to me. I read a Meta [outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436) of reasons", "by Community. Was this done automatically by the software? Was it a person?", "[question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77464/32436) was bumped to the homepage by Community. Was this done automatically by", "the bump had resulted from an edit, but the question doesn't seem to", "done automatically by the software? Was it a person? Why was it bumped?", "a person? Why was it bumped? It makes no sense to me. I", "Why was it bumped? It makes no sense to me. I read a", "makes no sense to me. I read a Meta [outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436) of reasons for", "I read a Meta [outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436) of reasons for bumping, and none of them", "bumped to the homepage by Community. Was this done automatically by the software?", "person? Why was it bumped? It makes no sense to me. I read", "no sense to me. I read a Meta [outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436) of reasons for bumping,", "a Meta [outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436) of reasons for bumping, and none of them fit. I", "bumping, and none of them fit. I thought that maybe the bump had", "for bumping, and none of them fit. I thought that maybe the bump", "I thought that maybe the bump had resulted from an edit, but the", "software? Was it a person? Why was it bumped? It makes no sense", "Was this done automatically by the software? Was it a person? Why was", "was it bumped? It makes no sense to me. I read a Meta", "to the homepage by Community. Was this done automatically by the software? Was", "bumped? It makes no sense to me. I read a Meta [outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436) of", "it bumped? It makes no sense to me. I read a Meta [outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436)", "it a person? Why was it bumped? It makes no sense to me.", "homepage by Community. Was this done automatically by the software? Was it a", "Was it a person? Why was it bumped? It makes no sense to", "read a Meta [outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436) of reasons for bumping, and none of them fit.", "this done automatically by the software? Was it a person? Why was it", "and none of them fit. I thought that maybe the bump had resulted", "me. I read a Meta [outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436) of reasons for bumping, and none of", "that maybe the bump had resulted from an edit, but the question doesn't", "of them fit. I thought that maybe the bump had resulted from an", "was bumped to the homepage by Community. Was this done automatically by the", "reasons for bumping, and none of them fit. I thought that maybe the", "resulted from an edit, but the question doesn't seem to have been edited.", "by the software? Was it a person? Why was it bumped? It makes", "none of them fit. I thought that maybe the bump had resulted from", "[outline](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1272/32436) of reasons for bumping, and none of them fit. I thought that" ]
[ "form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ```", "Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on", "addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the", "advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form.", "twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs ", "a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and will", "in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process.", "If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The", "mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything else to", "Please do not add anything else to the body of the post. If", "to this question must* conform to the following rules, or they will be", "show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of", "the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while", "a way to promote information and resources that are relevant to your own", "this new year, being that we're already in the second month, but we", "it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the", "are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the", "vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable", "hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) Must be GIF or PNG", "If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and", "exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to this question", "cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material", "as a way to promote information and resources that are relevant to your", "x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. Must be hosted", "* The image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or", "way to promote information and resources that are relevant to your own community's", "create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI.", "300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. Must be", "stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a way to promote", " cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be", "a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to", "* Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit", "second month, but we are now cycling the Community Promotion Ads for 2017!", "for future visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems important.", "Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on", "'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag", "can check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click", "be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. * Must", "the post. If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments.", "is a method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors", "it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold** an answer must", "a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post", "limit on file size of 150 KB * If the background of the", "interests, both for those already in the community and those yet to join.", "served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things.", "community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right", "the background of the image is white or partially white, there must be", "serves as a way to promote information and resources that are relevant to", "Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in", "in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from", "every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad", "else to the body of the post*. If you want to discuss something,", "the site's twitter account academic websites and resources * interesting campus story", "restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service", "we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the", "be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the", "new year, being that we're already in the second month, but we are", "both for those already in the community and those yet to join. ###", "Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane", "but we are now cycling the Community Promotion Ads for 2017! ### What", "this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled", "the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does", "to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following things:", "community and will continue to be so, it is a good idea to", "a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will", "minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be", "the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a way to", "advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This", "the body of the post*. If you want to discuss something, do it", "to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year", "service or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to", "white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it.", "the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For", "resources interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything", "are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show", "to the body of the post*. If you want to discuss something, do", "community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion", "question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community", "new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the", "genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out", "uploader (imgur) Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs ", "might promote the following things: the site's twitter account * academic websites", "score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown", "2017! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements", "for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the", "other things will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting", "Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently", "the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with", "pixels, or double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our", "Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main", "of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to", "in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset", "answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the main", "community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we", "an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the", "image is white or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px", "(currently 6) before it will be shown on the main site. You can", "into this new year, being that we're already in the second month, but", "ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions", "they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form", "required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must be", "those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year?", "years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces to show", "community deems important. This also serves as a way to promote information and", "and resources interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences ", "do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over", "be shown on the main site. You can check out the ads that", "(imgur) Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute", "the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is", "community's interests, both for those already in the community and those yet to", "will continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost it.", "in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic", "size of 150 KB If the background of the image is white", "main site. You can check out the ads that have met the threshold", "the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have", "show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything", "[1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything else to the", "the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images", "the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the", "join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will", "newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not", "subject matter of the community, but to the current status of the community.", "against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or", "information and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for", "rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the", "it a new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery", "the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be", "up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this", "campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community", "in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community,", "ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very", "Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB * If the background of", "things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just", "the community, but to the current status of the community. We reset the", "on the site. For example, you might promote the following things: * the", "add anything else to the body of the post*. If you want to", "site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting", "anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for", "every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things", "there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ###", "How does it work? The answers you post to this question must* conform", "this question must conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored.", "file size of 150 KB * If the background of the image is", "out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in", "will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads", "or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to be", "150 KB * If the background of the image is white or partially", "reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have", "while other things will wane to allow for new faces to show up.", "the subject matter of the community, but to the current status of the", "must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. ", "will be shown on the main site. You can check out the ads", "usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow for new", "questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements,", "on the main site. You can check out the ads that have met", "yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some", "that will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The", "The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged", "is white or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if", "### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold* an answer must meet", "1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is", "previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the", "250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through", "and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those", "December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from", "valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it is a", "our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No", "is for future visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems", "in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url", "if high DPI. Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur)", "future visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems important. This", "tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this", "example, you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account ", "of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The", "high DPI. Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) ", "question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\")", "those already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do", "have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer", "In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills", "the site. For example, you might promote the following things: the site's", "* Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be", "be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file", "for 2017! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted", "already in the second month, but we are now cycling the Community Promotion", "on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question", "or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The", "functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the", "DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must", "you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic", "community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads", "(2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a *minimum", "discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be", "resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already", "and will continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost", "It may be helpful to give it a new face in the process,", "year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose", "[2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything else to the body of", "the second month, but we are now cycling the Community Promotion Ads for", "cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community", "or double that if high DPI. Must be hosted through our standard", "* academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events", "maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow for", "Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that", "the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of", "if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a *minimum score", "purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps", "ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other", "and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out", "the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads?", "Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up", "This is a method for the community to control what gets promoted to", "before it will be shown on the main site. You can check out", "services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to", "PNG No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150", "process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale", "story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community would", "Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness", "form with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that", "always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In", "promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle.", "that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if", "late into this new year, being that we're already in the second month,", "show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old", "the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required", "give it a new face in the process, so as to prevent the", "stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers", "very valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it is", "else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future", "to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services", "Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements", "You can check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic", "in The goal is for future visitors to find out about the stuff", "the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads", "to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep", "it is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to", "faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and", "from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable", "to your own community's interests, both for those already in the community and", "Threshold There is a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6)", "that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already in", "enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form", "The goal is for future visitors to find out about the stuff your", "have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control", "be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a", "something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged", "All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show", "after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you", "meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the main site. You", "particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue", "interesting campus story blogs cool events or conferences * anything else your", "so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful", "we're already in the second month, but we are now cycling the Community", "year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will", "material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the", "have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a", "is a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it", "does it work? The answers you post to this question must conform to", "the Community Promotion Ads for 2017! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community", "Promotion Ads for 2017! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads", "being that we're already in the second month, but we are now cycling", "the years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces to", "that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader", "be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]:", "matter of the community, but to the current status of the community. We", "Ads for 2017! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are", "community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to", "of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to this", "### How does it work? The answers you post to this question must", "are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ###", "http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add anything else to the body of the", "reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad", "post to this question must* conform to the following rules, or they will", "site. You can check out the ads that have met the threshold with", "KB * If the background of the image is white or partially white,", "1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to", "[![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not", "you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high", "ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads", "face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad", "answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements The image", "but to the current status of the community. We reset the ads once", "enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion", "or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of", "will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose", "own community's interests, both for those already in the community and those yet", "events or conferences anything else your community would genuinely be interested in", "tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also", "the community and will continue to be so, it is a good idea", "of the post*. If you want to discuss something, do it in the", "is very valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it", "We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads", "for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to", "community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous", "Community Promotion Ads for 2017! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion", "Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site,", "a bit late into this new year, being that we're already in the", "the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure.", "idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new", "will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community", "to promote information and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests,", "the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but", "it will be shown on the main site. You can check out the", "month, but we are now cycling the Community Promotion Ads for 2017! ###", "do not add anything else to the body of the post. If you", "following things: the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources ", "account academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool", "``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do", "control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might", "The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a", "be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ```", "ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to be so,", "a method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on", "bit late into this new year, being that we're already in the second", "No animated GIFs Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB ", "threshold* an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on", "the current status of the community. We reset the ads once a year,", "* anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is", "of the image is white or partially white, there must be a 1px", "magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality", "* the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus", "to find out about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves", "for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate", "status of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December.", "with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling", "to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always", "the image is white or partially white, there must be a 1px border", "is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give", "on file size of 150 KB * If the background of the image", "conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal", "the main site. You can check out the ads that have met the", "things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting", "your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors", "to not just the subject matter of the community, but to the current", "your community deems important. This also serves as a way to promote information", "ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant", "process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the", "not add anything else to the body of the post. If you want", "now cycling the Community Promotion Ads for 2017! ### What are Community Promotion", "a new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of", "allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps", "year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an", "of 150 KB If the background of the image is white or", "an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is", "your own community's interests, both for those already in the community and those", "also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements", "also serves as a way to promote information and resources that are relevant", "prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of", "this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ###", "the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will", "on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add anything else", "to the current status of the community. We reset the ads once a", "and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every", "just the subject matter of the community, but to the current status of", "to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should", "year, being that we're already in the second month, but we are now", "of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above", "for those already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why", "purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are", "this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and", "so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after", "accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be", "year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to", "do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with", "the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no", "Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) Must be GIF", "above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must", "pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements ", "It is a bit late into this new year, being that we're already", "high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold", "This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the", "a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it", "relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already in the community", "the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the", "requirements The image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels,", "The answers you post to this question must conform to the following rules,", "do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community", "would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find", "goal is for future visitors to find out about the stuff your community", " If the background of the image is white or partially white, there", "and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do", "relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but to the", "as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a", "we are now cycling the Community Promotion Ads for 2017! ### What are", "promote information and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both", "or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI)", "of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How", "no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular", "the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create", "you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question", "to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you", "find out about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as", "Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the", "helpful to give it a new face in the process, so as to", "### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain", "provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why", "out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click stats [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/ads/display/3661).", "the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]:", "exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url", "that we're already in the second month, but we are now cycling the", "must conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All", "good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a", "white or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high", "be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold", "### Image requirements * The image that you create must be 300 x", "the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be", "surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold an answer", "If the background of the image is white or partially white, there must", "\"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the", "[community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of", "from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work?", "standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated", "There is a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before", "promote the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and", "keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter", "be helpful to give it a new face in the process, so as", "out about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a", "or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact", "what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote", "to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year", "* Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB * If the background", "What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will", "### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for", "work? The answers you post to this question must conform to the following", "is a bit late into this new year, being that we're already in", "their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This", "tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to", "about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a way", "method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the", "* No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB", "main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the", "conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers", "to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add", "will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow", "important. This also serves as a way to promote information and resources that", "be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition", "must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag.", "already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we", "Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control what gets", "anything else to the body of the post*. If you want to discuss", "in the second month, but we are now cycling the Community Promotion Ads", "GIF or PNG No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size", "The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements", "imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ###", "websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences", "Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the", "once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against", "answers you post to this question must conform to the following rules, or", "through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG ", "shown on the main site. You can check out the ads that have", "that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for", "ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If", "question must* conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1.", "with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you", "image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that", "This also serves as a way to promote information and resources that are", "must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the main site.", "Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control what", "to give it a new face in the process, so as to prevent", "advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar.", "ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it", "must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score", "every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their", "academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or", "background of the image is white or partially white, there must be a", "things will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the", "double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image", "gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the", "wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every", "image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs", "are now cycling the Community Promotion Ads for 2017! ### What are Community", "fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads", "site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs", "to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer", "be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out about", "animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB * If", "shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method", "comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show", "repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new face in", "for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site.", "Ads? This is a method for the community to control what gets promoted", "continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It", "the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The", "want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must", "should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2]", "of the community, but to the current status of the community. We reset", "up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads", "partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding", "helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to", "following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in", "be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or", "form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must be 300", "ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but to", "ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline", "promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following", "2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions", "ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served", "body of the post*. If you want to discuss something, do it in", "community, but to the current status of the community. We reset the ads", "of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please", "old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher", "The image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double", "current status of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every", "Image requirements The image that you create must be 300 x 250", "new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this,", "allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for", "is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting", "it work? The answers you post to this question must conform to the", "of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided,", "voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have", "a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting", "it. It may be helpful to give it a new face in the", "will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of:", "post*. If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2.", "border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a", "not just the subject matter of the community, but to the current status", "reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years,", "site. For example, you might promote the following things: the site's twitter", "visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following things: ", "``` Please do not add anything else to the body of the post.", " interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else", "advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown.", "check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click stats", "to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is", "right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of", "the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community", "are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already in the", "6) before it will be shown on the main site. You can check", "visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems important. This also", "cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested", "http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add anything else to the body", "GIFs Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB * If the", "the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting", "a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There", "to be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may", "tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image", "you post to this question must conform to the following rules, or they", "helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject", "For example, you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account", "answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on", "interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out about the", "to the community and will continue to be so, it is a good", "to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows", "DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold* an", "cycling the Community Promotion Ads for 2017! ### What are Community Promotion Ads?", "community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example,", "over the years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces", "to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new face", "may be helpful to give it a new face in the process, so", "blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely", "sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the", "getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The", "we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to", "be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may be", "the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources", "deems important*. This also serves as a way to promote information and resources", "### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that" ]
[ "Why was this question locked? (I have some guess, probably would have done", "[\"How to deal with instructor forcing me to do an uninteresting optional exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise)", "optional exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise) has been locked recently. The question is kind a of mirrored", "been locked because of the heavy downvotes; [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229) you find some reasons why", "this question locked? (I have some guess, probably would have done the same,", "meta equally good as flagging? * Why was this question locked? (I have", "be up- and downvotes on the question and also no edits or comments", "could learn more if I asked on meta. Specifically: * Is asking on", "guess, probably would have done the same, but I am curious.) * How", "to deal with uninterested students during an optional exercise session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session) and I think", "that both questions are a good and especially, both have great answers. However,", "also quite a few upvotes (currently being at -6 total). I imagine that", "of the heavy downvotes; [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229) you find some reasons why posts should be", "on meta equally good as flagging? * Why was this question locked? (I", "However, the first question was has received several downvotes and also quite a", "a good and especially, both have great answers. However, the first question was", "are partly due to the somehow offensive phrasing \"some internet people\". My guess", "being at -6 total). I imagine that the downvotes are partly due to", "optional exercise session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session) and I think that both questions are a good and", "comments can be made. I have the feeling, that the question should have", "and I think that both questions are a good and especially, both have", "have great answers. However, the first question was has received several downvotes and", "with uninterested students during an optional exercise session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session) and I think that both", "the downvotes are partly due to the somehow offensive phrasing \"some internet people\".", "phrasing \"some internet people\". My guess is that the question has been locked", "[How to deal with uninterested students during an optional exercise session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session) and I", "done the same, but I am curious.) * How to proceed with the", "and downvotes on the question and also no edits or comments can be", "(heavy downvotes are not exactly on the list…). As a locked question, there", "a little), comment that I find the question reasonable and also upvote it.", "I could learn more if I asked on meta. Specifically: * Is asking", "for moderator attention, but thought, I could learn more if I asked on", "have done the same, but I am curious.) * How to proceed with", "(currently being at -6 total). I imagine that the downvotes are partly due", "deal with uninterested students during an optional exercise session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session) and I think that", "mirrored question to [How to deal with uninterested students during an optional exercise", "question is kind a of mirrored question to [How to deal with uninterested", "and would like to edit it (tone down a little), comment that I", "not exactly on the list…). As a locked question, there can't be up-", "exactly on the list…). As a locked question, there can't be up- and", "quite a few upvotes (currently being at -6 total). I imagine that the", "-6 total). I imagine that the downvotes are partly due to the somehow", "question and also no edits or comments can be made. I have the", "better received and would like to edit it (tone down a little), comment", "question locked? (I have some guess, probably would have done the same, but", "to [How to deal with uninterested students during an optional exercise session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session) and", "the list…). As a locked question, there can't be up- and downvotes on", "good and especially, both have great answers. However, the first question was has", "I have the feeling, that the question should have been better received and", "answers. However, the first question was has received several downvotes and also quite", "that the question should have been better received and would like to edit", "uninteresting optional exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise) has been locked recently. The question is kind a of", "I could have flagged for moderator attention, but thought, I could learn more", "I imagine that the downvotes are partly due to the somehow offensive phrasing", "why posts should be locked (heavy downvotes are not exactly on the list…).", "was has received several downvotes and also quite a few upvotes (currently being", "been locked recently. The question is kind a of mirrored question to [How", "can be made. I have the feeling, that the question should have been", "downvotes on the question and also no edits or comments can be made.", "locked (heavy downvotes are not exactly on the list…). As a locked question,", "total). I imagine that the downvotes are partly due to the somehow offensive", "question should have been better received and would like to edit it (tone", "I think that both questions are a good and especially, both have great", "questions are a good and especially, both have great answers. However, the first", "feeling, that the question should have been better received and would like to", "locked question, there can't be up- and downvotes on the question and also", "locked? (I have some guess, probably would have done the same, but I", "that the downvotes are partly due to the somehow offensive phrasing \"some internet", "and especially, both have great answers. However, the first question was has received", "locked recently. The question is kind a of mirrored question to [How to", "recently. The question is kind a of mirrored question to [How to deal", "posts should be locked (heavy downvotes are not exactly on the list…). As", "good as flagging? * Why was this question locked? (I have some guess,", "received and would like to edit it (tone down a little), comment that", "would have done the same, but I am curious.) * How to proceed", "a locked question, there can't be up- and downvotes on the question and", "made. I have the feeling, that the question should have been better received", "exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise) has been locked recently. The question is kind a of mirrored question", "or comments can be made. I have the feeling, that the question should", "like to edit it (tone down a little), comment that I find the", "up- and downvotes on the question and also no edits or comments can", "great answers. However, the first question was has received several downvotes and also", "but thought, I could learn more if I asked on meta. Specifically: ", "and also no edits or comments can be made. I have the feeling,", " Is asking on meta equally good as flagging? * Why was this", "think that both questions are a good and especially, both have great answers.", "Is asking on meta equally good as flagging? * Why was this question", "received several downvotes and also quite a few upvotes (currently being at -6", "downvotes and also quite a few upvotes (currently being at -6 total). I", "have been better received and would like to edit it (tone down a", "reasons why posts should be locked (heavy downvotes are not exactly on the", "the question reasonable and also upvote it. I could have flagged for moderator", "the heavy downvotes; [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229) you find some reasons why posts should be locked", "was this question locked? (I have some guess, probably would have done the", "exercise session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session) and I think that both questions are a good and especially,", "instructor forcing me to do an uninteresting optional exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise) has been locked recently.", "the question has been locked because of the heavy downvotes; [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229) you find", "somehow offensive phrasing \"some internet people\". My guess is that the question has", "uninterested students during an optional exercise session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session) and I think that both questions", "that I find the question reasonable and also upvote it. I could have", "I asked on meta. Specifically: * Is asking on meta equally good as", "\"some internet people\". My guess is that the question has been locked because", "been better received and would like to edit it (tone down a little),", "to edit it (tone down a little), comment that I find the question", "has been locked because of the heavy downvotes; [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229) you find some reasons", "an optional exercise session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session) and I think that both questions are a good", "an uninteresting optional exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise) has been locked recently. The question is kind a", "that the question has been locked because of the heavy downvotes; [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229) you", "some guess, probably would have done the same, but I am curious.) ", "on the question and also no edits or comments can be made. I", "question was has received several downvotes and also quite a few upvotes (currently", "The question is kind a of mirrored question to [How to deal with", "[here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229) you find some reasons why posts should be locked (heavy downvotes are", "several downvotes and also quite a few upvotes (currently being at -6 total).", "and also quite a few upvotes (currently being at -6 total). I imagine", "thought, I could learn more if I asked on meta. Specifically: Is", "kind a of mirrored question to [How to deal with uninterested students during", "asked on meta. Specifically: * Is asking on meta equally good as flagging?", "be locked (heavy downvotes are not exactly on the list…). As a locked", "could have flagged for moderator attention, but thought, I could learn more if", "deal with instructor forcing me to do an uninteresting optional exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise) has been", "me to do an uninteresting optional exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise) has been locked recently. The question", "no edits or comments can be made. I have the feeling, that the", "is kind a of mirrored question to [How to deal with uninterested students", "As a locked question, there can't be up- and downvotes on the question", "has received several downvotes and also quite a few upvotes (currently being at", "question reasonable and also upvote it. I could have flagged for moderator attention,", "can't be up- and downvotes on the question and also no edits or", "should have been better received and would like to edit it (tone down", "students during an optional exercise session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session) and I think that both questions are", "people\". My guess is that the question has been locked because of the", "flagged for moderator attention, but thought, I could learn more if I asked", "imagine that the downvotes are partly due to the somehow offensive phrasing \"some", "offensive phrasing \"some internet people\". My guess is that the question has been", "partly due to the somehow offensive phrasing \"some internet people\". My guess is", "locked because of the heavy downvotes; [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229) you find some reasons why posts", "flagging? * Why was this question locked? (I have some guess, probably would", "would like to edit it (tone down a little), comment that I find", "to do an uninteresting optional exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise) has been locked recently. The question is", "the first question was has received several downvotes and also quite a few", "there can't be up- and downvotes on the question and also no edits", "because of the heavy downvotes; [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229) you find some reasons why posts should", "to deal with instructor forcing me to do an uninteresting optional exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise) has", "due to the somehow offensive phrasing \"some internet people\". My guess is that", "of mirrored question to [How to deal with uninterested students during an optional", "I find the question reasonable and also upvote it. I could have flagged", "reasonable and also upvote it. I could have flagged for moderator attention, but", "question, there can't be up- and downvotes on the question and also no", "on meta. Specifically: * Is asking on meta equally good as flagging? ", "downvotes are not exactly on the list…). As a locked question, there can't", "heavy downvotes; [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229) you find some reasons why posts should be locked (heavy", "during an optional exercise session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session) and I think that both questions are a", "it (tone down a little), comment that I find the question reasonable and", "Specifically: Is asking on meta equally good as flagging? * Why was", "has been locked recently. The question is kind a of mirrored question to", "guess is that the question has been locked because of the heavy downvotes;", "forcing me to do an uninteresting optional exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise) has been locked recently. The", "you find some reasons why posts should be locked (heavy downvotes are not", "upvotes (currently being at -6 total). I imagine that the downvotes are partly", "the feeling, that the question should have been better received and would like", "the question should have been better received and would like to edit it", "if I asked on meta. Specifically: * Is asking on meta equally good", "should be locked (heavy downvotes are not exactly on the list…). As a", "(I have some guess, probably would have done the same, but I am", "question has been locked because of the heavy downvotes; [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229) you find some", "My guess is that the question has been locked because of the heavy", "little), comment that I find the question reasonable and also upvote it. I", "downvotes; [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229) you find some reasons why posts should be locked (heavy downvotes", "edit it (tone down a little), comment that I find the question reasonable", "asking on meta equally good as flagging? * Why was this question locked?", "do an uninteresting optional exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise) has been locked recently. The question is kind", "downvotes are partly due to the somehow offensive phrasing \"some internet people\". My", "have flagged for moderator attention, but thought, I could learn more if I", "question to [How to deal with uninterested students during an optional exercise session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session)", "are a good and especially, both have great answers. However, the first question", "first question was has received several downvotes and also quite a few upvotes", "a few upvotes (currently being at -6 total). I imagine that the downvotes", "internet people\". My guess is that the question has been locked because of", "also upvote it. I could have flagged for moderator attention, but thought, I", "comment that I find the question reasonable and also upvote it. I could", "(tone down a little), comment that I find the question reasonable and also", "with instructor forcing me to do an uninteresting optional exercise?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84437/how-to-deal-with-instructor-forcing-me-to-do-an-uninteresting-optional-exercise) has been locked", "a of mirrored question to [How to deal with uninterested students during an", "both have great answers. However, the first question was has received several downvotes", "more if I asked on meta. Specifically: * Is asking on meta equally", "on the list…). As a locked question, there can't be up- and downvotes", "as flagging? * Why was this question locked? (I have some guess, probably", "some reasons why posts should be locked (heavy downvotes are not exactly on", "at -6 total). I imagine that the downvotes are partly due to the", "also no edits or comments can be made. I have the feeling, that", "and also upvote it. I could have flagged for moderator attention, but thought,", "find the question reasonable and also upvote it. I could have flagged for", "question [\"How to deal with instructor forcing me to do an uninteresting optional", "edits or comments can be made. I have the feeling, that the question", "attention, but thought, I could learn more if I asked on meta. Specifically:", "* Why was this question locked? (I have some guess, probably would have", "find some reasons why posts should be locked (heavy downvotes are not exactly", "learn more if I asked on meta. Specifically: * Is asking on meta", "especially, both have great answers. However, the first question was has received several", "to the somehow offensive phrasing \"some internet people\". My guess is that the", "session?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/84388/how-to-deal-with-uninterested-students-during-an-optional-exercise-session) and I think that both questions are a good and especially, both", "the question and also no edits or comments can be made. I have", "upvote it. I could have flagged for moderator attention, but thought, I could", "have some guess, probably would have done the same, but I am curious.)", "is that the question has been locked because of the heavy downvotes; [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/22229)", "be made. I have the feeling, that the question should have been better", "probably would have done the same, but I am curious.) * How to", "equally good as flagging? * Why was this question locked? (I have some", "it. I could have flagged for moderator attention, but thought, I could learn", "few upvotes (currently being at -6 total). I imagine that the downvotes are", "the somehow offensive phrasing \"some internet people\". My guess is that the question", "moderator attention, but thought, I could learn more if I asked on meta.", "list…). As a locked question, there can't be up- and downvotes on the", "down a little), comment that I find the question reasonable and also upvote", "meta. Specifically: * Is asking on meta equally good as flagging? * Why", "both questions are a good and especially, both have great answers. However, the", "have the feeling, that the question should have been better received and would", "the same, but I am curious.) * How to proceed with the question?", "are not exactly on the list…). As a locked question, there can't be", "The question [\"How to deal with instructor forcing me to do an uninteresting" ]
[ "I turn down an internship offer by a professor because I have a", "A few potential issues: * In many cases the asker is simply nervous", "answer that's applicable in the US may not work at all in Japan,", "such questions?** A few potential issues: * In many cases the asker is", "wording. * Sometimes newcomers to academia seem to think there are magic protocols", "PhD student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1) * [How to tell a professor at a foreign university politely", "Often this is a student trying to tell something to a professor. ", "are anxious about their language skills, etc. They may be looking for reassurance", "they are clearly expressing themselves, or whether the tone of their wording is", "are clearly expressing themselves, or whether the tone of their wording is appropriate.", "instance; but maybe that distinction doesn't really have anything to do with academia.", "have anything to do with academia. Language issues may come into play.", "a professor at a foreign university politely and impressively that I can’t cover", "tone of their wording is appropriate. Again, this might not really have anything", "worried about the reaction, or are anxious about their language skills, etc. They", "a prof who is not happy with my actions which were simply a", "foreign university politely and impressively that I can’t cover the costs of living", "their wording is appropriate. Again, this might not really have anything to do", "lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1) * [How do I explain to a prof who is not happy", "as everyone else. (To which we have JeffE's classic response: \"Pretend as though", "communicate just the same as everyone else. (To which we have JeffE's classic", "asker is not writing in their native language and is unsure whether they", "are just not sure how to say it. Often this is a student", "that distinction doesn't really have anything to do with academia. * Language issues", "university politely and impressively that I can’t cover the costs of living for", "talking to a professor, or have bad news or a sensitive request and", "explain to a prof who is not happy with my actions which were", "news or a sensitive request and are worried about the reaction, or are", "protocols to follow, and seem to be unaware that academics generally communicate just", "in Japan, for instance; but maybe that distinction doesn't really have anything to", "in their native language and is unsure whether they are clearly expressing themselves,", "the asker is not writing in their native language and is unsure whether", "into play. Perhaps the asker is not writing in their native language and", "play. Perhaps the asker is not writing in their native language and is", "because I have a better offer in a corporate research lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1) * [How", "do I explain to a prof who is not happy with my actions", "generally communicate just the same as everyone else. (To which we have JeffE's", "reassurance rather than help with wording. * Sometimes newcomers to academia seem to", "the asker is simply nervous - perhaps they are intimidated by the idea", "may be looking for reassurance rather than help with wording. * Sometimes newcomers", "not work at all in Japan, for instance; but maybe that distinction doesn't", "that I can’t cover the costs of living for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1) * [How", "a professor. * [What sentence is suitable for thanking a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor) * [How", "another professor he knows to accept me as PhD student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1) * [How to", "reaction, or are anxious about their language skills, etc. They may be looking", "their language skills, etc. They may be looking for reassurance rather than help", "issues may come into play. Perhaps the asker is not writing in their", "looking for reassurance rather than help with wording. * Sometimes newcomers to academia", "that's applicable in the US may not work at all in Japan, for", "academia seem to think there are magic protocols to follow, and seem to", "really have anything to do with academia. * Language issues may come into", "knows to accept me as PhD student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1) * [How to tell a professor", "seem to be unaware that academics generally communicate just the same as everyone", "is not happy with my actions which were simply a mistake due to", "JeffE's classic response: \"Pretend as though he were human\".) * Cultural factors may", "with academia. * Language issues may come into play. Perhaps the asker is", "impressively that I can’t cover the costs of living for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1) ", "may come into play. Etiquette, polite wording, etc, vary much more between cultures", "is a student trying to tell something to a professor. [What sentence", "the same as everyone else. (To which we have JeffE's classic response: \"Pretend", "* In many cases the asker is simply nervous - perhaps they are", "which were simply a mistake due to miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1) *What advice can we offer", "is not writing in their native language and is unsure whether they are", "to follow, and seem to be unaware that academics generally communicate just the", "have a better offer in a corporate research lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1) [How do I", "offer in a corporate research lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1) * [How do I explain to a", "wording is appropriate. Again, this might not really have anything to do with", "in the US may not work at all in Japan, for instance; but", "everyone else. (To which we have JeffE's classic response: \"Pretend as though he", "or have bad news or a sensitive request and are worried about the", "gets quite a few questions from people in academia who want to communicate", "anything to do with academia. * Language issues may come into play. Perhaps", "distinction doesn't really have anything to do with academia. * Language issues may", "more between cultures than inside/outside academia. An answer that's applicable in the US", "for instance; but maybe that distinction doesn't really have anything to do with", "answering, or moderating such questions?** A few potential issues: * In many cases", "ask a professor to contact another professor he knows to accept me as", "much more between cultures than inside/outside academia. An answer that's applicable in the", "vary much more between cultures than inside/outside academia. An answer that's applicable in", "professor, or have bad news or a sensitive request and are worried about", "down an internship offer by a professor because I have a better offer", "with wording. * Sometimes newcomers to academia seem to think there are magic", "people in academia who want to communicate something to someone, but are just", "accept me as PhD student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1) * [How to tell a professor at a", "professor he knows to accept me as PhD student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1) * [How to tell", "I explain to a prof who is not happy with my actions which", "* [How do I turn down an internship offer by a professor because", "about the reaction, or are anxious about their language skills, etc. They may", "a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor) * [How do I politely ask a professor to contact another", "not happy with my actions which were simply a mistake due to miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1)", "for thanking a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor) * [How do I politely ask a professor to", "contact another professor he knows to accept me as PhD student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1) * [How", "writing in their native language and is unsure whether they are clearly expressing", "he knows to accept me as PhD student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1) * [How to tell a", "classic response: \"Pretend as though he were human\".) * Cultural factors may come", "it. Often this is a student trying to tell something to a professor.", "newcomers to academia seem to think there are magic protocols to follow, and", "with my actions which were simply a mistake due to miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1) *What advice", "is suitable for thanking a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor) [How do I politely ask a", "think there are magic protocols to follow, and seem to be unaware that", "to academia seem to think there are magic protocols to follow, and seem", "* Cultural factors may come into play. Etiquette, polite wording, etc, vary much", "we have JeffE's classic response: \"Pretend as though he were human\".) * Cultural", "or are anxious about their language skills, etc. They may be looking for", "nervous - perhaps they are intimidated by the idea of talking to a", "that academics generally communicate just the same as everyone else. (To which we", "* [How to tell a professor at a foreign university politely and impressively", "at all in Japan, for instance; but maybe that distinction doesn't really have", "(To which we have JeffE's classic response: \"Pretend as though he were human\".)", "[How do I turn down an internship offer by a professor because I", "and impressively that I can’t cover the costs of living for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1)", "tell something to a professor. * [What sentence is suitable for thanking a", "or a sensitive request and are worried about the reaction, or are anxious", "a professor, or have bad news or a sensitive request and are worried", "to a professor, or have bad news or a sensitive request and are", "about their language skills, etc. They may be looking for reassurance rather than", "can’t cover the costs of living for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1) * [How do I", "we offer for asking, answering, or moderating such questions? A few potential issues:", "just not sure how to say it. Often this is a student trying", "[How to tell a professor at a foreign university politely and impressively that", "be unaware that academics generally communicate just the same as everyone else. (To", "a mistake due to miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1) What advice can we offer for asking, answering,", "to say it. Often this is a student trying to tell something to", "asking, answering, or moderating such questions?** A few potential issues: * In many", "sentence is suitable for thanking a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor) * [How do I politely ask", "the costs of living for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1) * [How do I turn down", "were simply a mistake due to miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1) *What advice can we offer for", "questions from people in academia who want to communicate something to someone, but", " [What sentence is suitable for thanking a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor) * [How do I", "by the idea of talking to a professor, or have bad news or", "are intimidated by the idea of talking to a professor, or have bad", "do with academia. * Language issues may come into play. Perhaps the asker", "be looking for reassurance rather than help with wording. * Sometimes newcomers to", "to miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1) *What advice can we offer for asking, answering, or moderating such", "language and is unsure whether they are clearly expressing themselves, or whether the", "bad news or a sensitive request and are worried about the reaction, or", "issues: In many cases the asker is simply nervous - perhaps they", "* [How do I explain to a prof who is not happy with", "US may not work at all in Japan, for instance; but maybe that", "or whether the tone of their wording is appropriate. Again, this might not", "all in Japan, for instance; but maybe that distinction doesn't really have anything", "asker is simply nervous - perhaps they are intimidated by the idea of", "whether the tone of their wording is appropriate. Again, this might not really", "not writing in their native language and is unsure whether they are clearly", "questions?** A few potential issues: * In many cases the asker is simply", "have bad news or a sensitive request and are worried about the reaction,", "applicable in the US may not work at all in Japan, for instance;", "\"Pretend as though he were human\".) * Cultural factors may come into play.", "etc, vary much more between cultures than inside/outside academia. An answer that's applicable", "else. (To which we have JeffE's classic response: \"Pretend as though he were", "to think there are magic protocols to follow, and seem to be unaware", "is appropriate. Again, this might not really have anything to do with academia.", "doesn't really have anything to do with academia. * Language issues may come", "few questions from people in academia who want to communicate something to someone,", "cases the asker is simply nervous - perhaps they are intimidated by the", "for asking, answering, or moderating such questions?** A few potential issues: * In", "etc. They may be looking for reassurance rather than help with wording. ", "An answer that's applicable in the US may not work at all in", "same as everyone else. (To which we have JeffE's classic response: \"Pretend as", "the US may not work at all in Japan, for instance; but maybe", "do I turn down an internship offer by a professor because I have", "and is unsure whether they are clearly expressing themselves, or whether the tone", "a professor because I have a better offer in a corporate research lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1)", "unaware that academics generally communicate just the same as everyone else. (To which", "seem to think there are magic protocols to follow, and seem to be", "I can’t cover the costs of living for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1) [How do", "anxious about their language skills, etc. They may be looking for reassurance rather", "do I politely ask a professor to contact another professor he knows to", "is unsure whether they are clearly expressing themselves, or whether the tone of", "a better offer in a corporate research lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1) * [How do I explain", "clearly expressing themselves, or whether the tone of their wording is appropriate. Again,", "They may be looking for reassurance rather than help with wording. * Sometimes", "which we have JeffE's classic response: \"Pretend as though he were human\".) ", "were human\".) Cultural factors may come into play. Etiquette, polite wording, etc,", "Perhaps the asker is not writing in their native language and is unsure", "quite a few questions from people in academia who want to communicate something", "but are just not sure how to say it. Often this is a", "between cultures than inside/outside academia. An answer that's applicable in the US may", "Etiquette, polite wording, etc, vary much more between cultures than inside/outside academia. An", "happy with my actions which were simply a mistake due to miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1) *What", "offer by a professor because I have a better offer in a corporate", "request and are worried about the reaction, or are anxious about their language", "come into play. Perhaps the asker is not writing in their native language", "just the same as everyone else. (To which we have JeffE's classic response:", "rather than help with wording. Sometimes newcomers to academia seem to think", "response: \"Pretend as though he were human\".) * Cultural factors may come into", "I have a better offer in a corporate research lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1) * [How do", "than inside/outside academia. An answer that's applicable in the US may not work", "into play. Etiquette, polite wording, etc, vary much more between cultures than inside/outside", "he were human\".) * Cultural factors may come into play. Etiquette, polite wording,", "expressing themselves, or whether the tone of their wording is appropriate. Again, this", "Language issues may come into play. Perhaps the asker is not writing in", "they are intimidated by the idea of talking to a professor, or have", "something to someone, but are just not sure how to say it. Often", "to contact another professor he knows to accept me as PhD student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1) ", "to tell something to a professor. [What sentence is suitable for thanking", "miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1) What advice can we offer for asking, answering, or moderating such questions?", "for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1) * [How do I turn down an internship offer by", "Cultural factors may come into play. Etiquette, polite wording, etc, vary much more", "the idea of talking to a professor, or have bad news or a", "a foreign university politely and impressively that I can’t cover the costs of", "actions which were simply a mistake due to miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1) *What advice can we", "who want to communicate something to someone, but are just not sure how", "maybe that distinction doesn't really have anything to do with academia. Language", "PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1) * [How do I turn down an internship offer by a professor", "to do with academia. * Language issues may come into play. Perhaps the", "a professor to contact another professor he knows to accept me as PhD", "thanking a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor) * [How do I politely ask a professor to contact", "professor because I have a better offer in a corporate research lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1) ", "my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1) [How do I turn down an internship offer by a", "and are worried about the reaction, or are anxious about their language skills,", "an internship offer by a professor because I have a better offer in", "of their wording is appropriate. Again, this might not really have anything to", "living for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1) * [How do I turn down an internship offer", "me as PhD student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1) * [How to tell a professor at a foreign", "to tell a professor at a foreign university politely and impressively that I", "mistake due to miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1) What advice can we offer for asking, answering, or", "What advice can we offer for asking, answering, or moderating such questions? A", "simply a mistake due to miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1) What advice can we offer for asking,", "[How do I politely ask a professor to contact another professor he knows", "communicate something to someone, but are just not sure how to say it.", "politely ask a professor to contact another professor he knows to accept me", "help with wording. * Sometimes newcomers to academia seem to think there are", "* Sometimes newcomers to academia seem to think there are magic protocols to", "to be unaware that academics generally communicate just the same as everyone else.", "politely and impressively that I can’t cover the costs of living for my", "I politely ask a professor to contact another professor he knows to accept", "a student trying to tell something to a professor. * [What sentence is", "student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1) * [How to tell a professor at a foreign university politely and", "themselves, or whether the tone of their wording is appropriate. Again, this might", "of talking to a professor, or have bad news or a sensitive request", "professor to contact another professor he knows to accept me as PhD student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1)", "sensitive request and are worried about the reaction, or are anxious about their", "professor at a foreign university politely and impressively that I can’t cover the", "the reaction, or are anxious about their language skills, etc. They may be", "to accept me as PhD student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1) * [How to tell a professor at", "have JeffE's classic response: \"Pretend as though he were human\".) * Cultural factors", "advice can we offer for asking, answering, or moderating such questions? A few", "moderating such questions? A few potential issues: * In many cases the asker", "academia. An answer that's applicable in the US may not work at all", "are magic protocols to follow, and seem to be unaware that academics generally", "polite wording, etc, vary much more between cultures than inside/outside academia. An answer", "come into play. Etiquette, polite wording, etc, vary much more between cultures than", "to communicate something to someone, but are just not sure how to say", "inside/outside academia. An answer that's applicable in the US may not work at", "research lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1) * [How do I explain to a prof who is not", "but maybe that distinction doesn't really have anything to do with academia. ", "as PhD student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/52580/how-do-i-politely-ask-a-professor-to-contact-another-professor-he-knows-to-accep?rq=1) [How to tell a professor at a foreign university", "factors may come into play. Etiquette, polite wording, etc, vary much more between", "idea of talking to a professor, or have bad news or a sensitive", "though he were human\".) * Cultural factors may come into play. Etiquette, polite", "the tone of their wording is appropriate. Again, this might not really have", "at a foreign university politely and impressively that I can’t cover the costs", "academia. * Language issues may come into play. Perhaps the asker is not", "trying to tell something to a professor. * [What sentence is suitable for", "is simply nervous - perhaps they are intimidated by the idea of talking", "simply nervous - perhaps they are intimidated by the idea of talking to", "costs of living for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1) * [How do I turn down an", "human\".) * Cultural factors may come into play. Etiquette, polite wording, etc, vary", "as though he were human\".) * Cultural factors may come into play. Etiquette,", "whether they are clearly expressing themselves, or whether the tone of their wording", "unsure whether they are clearly expressing themselves, or whether the tone of their", "play. Etiquette, polite wording, etc, vary much more between cultures than inside/outside academia.", "native language and is unsure whether they are clearly expressing themselves, or whether", "my actions which were simply a mistake due to miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1) *What advice can", "magic protocols to follow, and seem to be unaware that academics generally communicate", "Japan, for instance; but maybe that distinction doesn't really have anything to do", "academics generally communicate just the same as everyone else. (To which we have", " [How do I politely ask a professor to contact another professor he", "this is a student trying to tell something to a professor. * [What", "in academia who want to communicate something to someone, but are just not", "- perhaps they are intimidated by the idea of talking to a professor,", "follow, and seem to be unaware that academics generally communicate just the same", "language skills, etc. They may be looking for reassurance rather than help with", "[How do I explain to a prof who is not happy with my", "than help with wording. * Sometimes newcomers to academia seem to think there", "professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor) * [How do I politely ask a professor to contact another professor", "internship offer by a professor because I have a better offer in a", "academia who want to communicate something to someone, but are just not sure", "offer for asking, answering, or moderating such questions?** A few potential issues: ", "cover the costs of living for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1) [How do I turn", "in a corporate research lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1) * [How do I explain to a prof", "by a professor because I have a better offer in a corporate research", "potential issues: * In many cases the asker is simply nervous - perhaps", "Academia gets quite a few questions from people in academia who want to", "something to a professor. * [What sentence is suitable for thanking a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor)", "not sure how to say it. Often this is a student trying to", "few potential issues: * In many cases the asker is simply nervous -", "wording, etc, vary much more between cultures than inside/outside academia. An answer that's", "of living for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59768/how-to-tell-a-professor-at-a-foreign-university-politely-and-impressively-that-i?rq=1) * [How do I turn down an internship", "may not work at all in Japan, for instance; but maybe that distinction", "due to miscommunication?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65302/how-do-i-explain-to-a-prof-who-is-not-happy-with-my-actions-which-were-simply-a?rq=1) *What advice can we offer for asking, answering, or moderating", "say it. Often this is a student trying to tell something to a", "someone, but are just not sure how to say it. Often this is", "[What sentence is suitable for thanking a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor) [How do I politely", "cultures than inside/outside academia. An answer that's applicable in the US may not", "may come into play. Perhaps the asker is not writing in their native", "for reassurance rather than help with wording. * Sometimes newcomers to academia seem", "student trying to tell something to a professor. * [What sentence is suitable", "corporate research lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1) * [How do I explain to a prof who is", "who is not happy with my actions which were simply a mistake due", "turn down an internship offer by a professor because I have a better", "perhaps they are intimidated by the idea of talking to a professor, or", "Sometimes newcomers to academia seem to think there are magic protocols to follow,", "to someone, but are just not sure how to say it. Often this", "better offer in a corporate research lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1) * [How do I explain to", "In many cases the asker is simply nervous - perhaps they are intimidated", "to a professor. * [What sentence is suitable for thanking a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor) ", "skills, etc. They may be looking for reassurance rather than help with wording.", "are worried about the reaction, or are anxious about their language skills, etc.", "a few questions from people in academia who want to communicate something to", " Language issues may come into play. Perhaps the asker is not writing", "many cases the asker is simply nervous - perhaps they are intimidated by", "professor. * [What sentence is suitable for thanking a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor) * [How do", "and seem to be unaware that academics generally communicate just the same as", "sure how to say it. Often this is a student trying to tell", "a corporate research lab?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/41741/how-do-i-turn-down-an-internship-offer-by-a-professor-because-i-have-a-better-of?rq=1) * [How do I explain to a prof who", "tell a professor at a foreign university politely and impressively that I can’t", "intimidated by the idea of talking to a professor, or have bad news", "how to say it. Often this is a student trying to tell something", "work at all in Japan, for instance; but maybe that distinction doesn't really", "can we offer for asking, answering, or moderating such questions?** A few potential", "there are magic protocols to follow, and seem to be unaware that academics", "from people in academia who want to communicate something to someone, but are", "to a prof who is not happy with my actions which were simply", "suitable for thanking a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/85417/what-sentence-is-suitable-for-thanking-a-professor) * [How do I politely ask a professor", "or moderating such questions?** A few potential issues: * In many cases the", "their native language and is unsure whether they are clearly expressing themselves, or", "a sensitive request and are worried about the reaction, or are anxious about", "prof who is not happy with my actions which were simply a mistake", "want to communicate something to someone, but are just not sure how to" ]
[ "Washington DC, but there will likely be marches all over the world. There", "the event is somewhat political in nature, I wanted to check with the", "the world. There is an [SE chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) dedicated to the march. As", "nature, I wanted to check with the community before creating an event. The", "are scientists and/or support science, I was wondering if we wanted a community", "I was wondering if we wanted a community event countdown to be shown", "main page. As the event is somewhat political in nature, I wanted to", "if we wanted a community event countdown to be shown on the main", "is an event/protest/rally being held on April 22 2017. The main march will", "being held on April 22 2017. The main march will occur in Washington", "on April 22 2017. The main march will occur in Washington DC, but", "support science, I was wondering if we wanted a community event countdown to", "before creating an event. The countdown timer is not overbearing and is just", "was wondering if we wanted a community event countdown to be shown on", "I wanted to check with the community before creating an event. The countdown", "Science](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) is an event/protest/rally being held on April 22 2017. The main march", "There is an [SE chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) dedicated to the march. As many of", "is an [SE chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) dedicated to the march. As many of our", "April 22 2017. The main march will occur in Washington DC, but there", "the march. As many of our community members are scientists and/or support science,", "many of our community members are scientists and/or support science, I was wondering", "the main page. As the event is somewhat political in nature, I wanted", "an event/protest/rally being held on April 22 2017. The main march will occur", "to be shown on the main page. As the event is somewhat political", "check with the community before creating an event. The countdown timer is not", "there will likely be marches all over the world. There is an [SE", "wondering if we wanted a community event countdown to be shown on the", "main march will occur in Washington DC, but there will likely be marches", "a community event countdown to be shown on the main page. As the", "event countdown to be shown on the main page. As the event is", "and/or support science, I was wondering if we wanted a community event countdown", "is somewhat political in nature, I wanted to check with the community before", "held on April 22 2017. The main march will occur in Washington DC,", "[SE chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) dedicated to the march. As many of our community members", "science, I was wondering if we wanted a community event countdown to be", "likely be marches all over the world. There is an [SE chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington)", "of our community members are scientists and/or support science, I was wondering if", "dedicated to the march. As many of our community members are scientists and/or", "community members are scientists and/or support science, I was wondering if we wanted", "to the march. As many of our community members are scientists and/or support", "over the world. There is an [SE chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) dedicated to the march.", "22 2017. The main march will occur in Washington DC, but there will", "in nature, I wanted to check with the community before creating an event.", "community event countdown to be shown on the main page. As the event", "world. There is an [SE chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) dedicated to the march. As many", "timer is not overbearing and is just a small item on the side", "page. As the event is somewhat political in nature, I wanted to check", "wanted a community event countdown to be shown on the main page. As", "wanted to check with the community before creating an event. The countdown timer", "event/protest/rally being held on April 22 2017. The main march will occur in", "event is somewhat political in nature, I wanted to check with the community", "members are scientists and/or support science, I was wondering if we wanted a", "The [March for Science](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) is an event/protest/rally being held on April 22 2017.", "march will occur in Washington DC, but there will likely be marches all", "event. The countdown timer is not overbearing and is just a small item", "for Science](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) is an event/protest/rally being held on April 22 2017. The main", "The countdown timer is not overbearing and is just a small item on", "creating an event. The countdown timer is not overbearing and is just a", "an event. The countdown timer is not overbearing and is just a small", "we wanted a community event countdown to be shown on the main page.", "countdown timer is not overbearing and is just a small item on the", "be shown on the main page. As the event is somewhat political in", "political in nature, I wanted to check with the community before creating an", "occur in Washington DC, but there will likely be marches all over the", "is not overbearing and is just a small item on the side bar.", "be marches all over the world. There is an [SE chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) dedicated", "community before creating an event. The countdown timer is not overbearing and is", "[March for Science](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) is an event/protest/rally being held on April 22 2017. The", "on the main page. As the event is somewhat political in nature, I", "As many of our community members are scientists and/or support science, I was", "DC, but there will likely be marches all over the world. There is", "march. As many of our community members are scientists and/or support science, I", "somewhat political in nature, I wanted to check with the community before creating", "the community before creating an event. The countdown timer is not overbearing and", "room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) dedicated to the march. As many of our community members are scientists", "The main march will occur in Washington DC, but there will likely be", "scientists and/or support science, I was wondering if we wanted a community event", "our community members are scientists and/or support science, I was wondering if we", "to check with the community before creating an event. The countdown timer is", "an [SE chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) dedicated to the march. As many of our community", "chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) dedicated to the march. As many of our community members are", "but there will likely be marches all over the world. There is an", "As the event is somewhat political in nature, I wanted to check with", "will occur in Washington DC, but there will likely be marches all over", "with the community before creating an event. The countdown timer is not overbearing", "in Washington DC, but there will likely be marches all over the world.", "marches all over the world. There is an [SE chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) dedicated to", "will likely be marches all over the world. There is an [SE chat", "2017. The main march will occur in Washington DC, but there will likely", "countdown to be shown on the main page. As the event is somewhat", "all over the world. There is an [SE chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/52641/scientists-march-on-washington) dedicated to the", "shown on the main page. As the event is somewhat political in nature," ]
[ "on who's viewing your question. If the purpose is to exclude rude and", "and ignored. [What to do when you have not received a response three", "few solutions. No one wants enough variability in their anesthesia to kill them.", "[What to do when you have not received a response three weeks after", "students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students) Is a shopping question on what phd program to select. +4 up", "offensive behavior and to create a welcoming environment, I don't really see that", "do with academia being highly prioritized. [How to deal with an inappropriate greeting", "just snark. And a simpler rule set \"No cursing, no racism, sexism, etc.\"", "could just as easily create that sort of environment. This question is about", "really see that either. Obvious insults may be quickly deleted but the questions", "deleted but the questions are frequently met with inconsistently enforced rules, dismissive links", "to emails dealing with research paper submissions being down voted and ignored. [What", "viewing your question. If the purpose is to exclude rude and offensive behavior", "are you measuring whether your judges are doing their job?\" or \"How are", "phd program to select. +4 up votes. Right below it <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen> Another shopping", "community?\" that every organization has to answer. The most meta of questions to", "wants enough variability in their anesthesia to kill them. Democracies where voters get", "instance. And everyone is probably willing to admit more precision is better than", "voters get to decide value are never perfect. Elevating individuals to judge others", "programs with \"higher quality\" students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students) Is a shopping question on what phd program", "academia being highly prioritized. [How to deal with an inappropriate greeting in an", "goal appears to be different depending on who's viewing your question. If the", "basic meta as it gets. How to check internal measurements of standards. Every", "revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi) If the purpose is to form a consistently high standard, how are", "meeting that goal? Because that goal appears to be different depending on who's", "with my academic career\" being up voted, when there's an infinite number of", "behavior and to create a welcoming environment, I don't really see that either.", "to solutions that only tangentially answer the questions, or just snark. And a", "admit more precision is better than less, and more solutions are more valuable", "infinite number of potential answers, and no one can guarantee that the response", "and offensive behavior and to create a welcoming environment, I don't really see", "one can guarantee that the response is going to be helpful. Then there", "and no one can guarantee that the response is going to be helpful.", "you ensuring that your democracy is meeting the needs of the community?\" that", "has to answer. The most meta of questions to be asked. And from", "in an email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email) And another question about how to respond to emails dealing", "is a simple question \"How are you measuring whether your judges are doing", "or \"How are you ensuring that your democracy is meeting the needs of", "high standard, how are you ensuring that you're meeting that goal? Because that", "as easily create that sort of environment. This question is about as basic", "ignored. [What to do when you have not received a response three weeks", "don't really see that either. Obvious insults may be quickly deleted but the", "frequently met with inconsistently enforced rules, dismissive links to solutions that only tangentially", "on their standards. Hospitals aren't willy nilly winging their prescriptions for instance. And", "judges are doing their job?\" or \"How are you ensuring that your democracy", "up voted, when there's an infinite number of potential answers, and no one", "to decide value are never perfect. Elevating individuals to judge others always leads", "than less, and more solutions are more valuable than few solutions. No one", "to form a consistently high standard, how are you ensuring that you're meeting", "select. +4 up votes. Right below it <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen> Another shopping question on what", "insults may be quickly deleted but the questions are frequently met with inconsistently", "are you ensuring that your democracy is meeting the needs of the community?\"", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen> Another shopping question on what phd program to select. -4 down votes.", "be helpful. Then there are other similar questions being down voted as too", "[Should I prefer PhD programs with \"higher quality\" students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students) Is a shopping question", "your democracy is meeting the needs of the community?\" that every organization has", "racism, sexism, etc.\" could just as easily create that sort of environment. This", "Another shopping question on what phd program to select. -4 down votes. There", "to select. -4 down votes. There are social etiquette questions about how to", "and more solutions are more valuable than few solutions. No one wants enough", "to be different depending on who's viewing your question. If the purpose is", "to exclude rude and offensive behavior and to create a welcoming environment, I", "on what phd program to select. +4 up votes. Right below it <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen>", "that only tangentially answer the questions, or just snark. And a simpler rule", "depending on who's viewing your question. If the purpose is to exclude rude", "sort of environment. This question is about as basic meta as it gets.", "be asked. And from what I've seen I expect it to be down", "standards. Every serious company has constant checks on their standards. Hospitals aren't willy", "but the questions are frequently met with inconsistently enforced rules, dismissive links to", "respond to emails dealing with research paper submissions being down voted and ignored.", "the questions are frequently met with inconsistently enforced rules, dismissive links to solutions", "votes. There are social etiquette questions about how to answer emails that have", "down voted and ignored. [What to do when you have not received a", "question is about as basic meta as it gets. How to check internal", "emails that have almost nothing to do with academia being highly prioritized. [How", "serious company has constant checks on their standards. Hospitals aren't willy nilly winging", "quality\" students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students) Is a shopping question on what phd program to select. +4", "The most meta of questions to be asked. And from what I've seen", "judge others always leads to flawed decision making. This is a simple question", "answers, and no one can guarantee that the response is going to be", "how to answer emails that have almost nothing to do with academia being", "potential answers, and no one can guarantee that the response is going to", "is about as basic meta as it gets. How to check internal measurements", "the purpose is to exclude rude and offensive behavior and to create a", "about how to answer emails that have almost nothing to do with academia", "to do when you have not received a response three weeks after submitting", "environment, I don't really see that either. Obvious insults may be quickly deleted", "job?\" or \"How are you ensuring that your democracy is meeting the needs", "get to decide value are never perfect. Elevating individuals to judge others always", "kill them. Democracies where voters get to decide value are never perfect. Elevating", "program to select. -4 down votes. There are social etiquette questions about how", "rude and offensive behavior and to create a welcoming environment, I don't really", "the community?\" that every organization has to answer. The most meta of questions", "And everyone is probably willing to admit more precision is better than less,", "questions, or just snark. And a simpler rule set \"No cursing, no racism,", "links to solutions that only tangentially answer the questions, or just snark. And", "to do with academia being highly prioritized. [How to deal with an inappropriate", "company has constant checks on their standards. Hospitals aren't willy nilly winging their", "as it gets. How to check internal measurements of standards. Every serious company", "paper submissions being down voted and ignored. [What to do when you have", "leads to flawed decision making. This is a simple question \"How are you", "half of the question have some sort of bickering on what's appropriate. There", "has constant checks on their standards. Hospitals aren't willy nilly winging their prescriptions", "most meta of questions to be asked. And from what I've seen I", "are never perfect. Elevating individuals to judge others always leads to flawed decision", "have almost nothing to do with academia being highly prioritized. [How to deal", "perfect. Elevating individuals to judge others always leads to flawed decision making. This", "Then there are other similar questions being down voted as too broad. For", "their job?\" or \"How are you ensuring that your democracy is meeting the", "to kill them. Democracies where voters get to decide value are never perfect.", "another question about how to respond to emails dealing with research paper submissions", "my academic career\" being up voted, when there's an infinite number of potential", "check internal measurements of standards. Every serious company has constant checks on their", "voted and ignored. [What to do when you have not received a response", "helpful. Then there are other similar questions being down voted as too broad.", "no racism, sexism, etc.\" could just as easily create that sort of environment.", "number of potential answers, and no one can guarantee that the response is", "are social etiquette questions about how to answer emails that have almost nothing", "emails dealing with research paper submissions being down voted and ignored. [What to", "greeting in an email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email) And another question about how to respond to emails", "email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email) And another question about how to respond to emails dealing with research", "\"How are you ensuring that your democracy is meeting the needs of the", "dealing with research paper submissions being down voted and ignored. [What to do", "with academia being highly prioritized. [How to deal with an inappropriate greeting in", "with an inappropriate greeting in an email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email) And another question about how to", "question on what phd program to select. -4 down votes. There are social", "just as easily create that sort of environment. This question is about as", "question \"How are you measuring whether your judges are doing their job?\" or", "career\" being up voted, when there's an infinite number of potential answers, and", "ended as \"What should I do with my academic career\" being up voted,", "three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi) If the purpose is to form a", "minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi) If the purpose is to form a consistently high standard, how", "checks on their standards. Hospitals aren't willy nilly winging their prescriptions for instance.", "as too broad. For example [Should I prefer PhD programs with \"higher quality\"", "answer. The most meta of questions to be asked. And from what I've", "democracy is meeting the needs of the community?\" that every organization has to", "sort of bickering on what's appropriate. There are questions as open ended as", "etc.\" could just as easily create that sort of environment. This question is", "where voters get to decide value are never perfect. Elevating individuals to judge", "meta of questions to be asked. And from what I've seen I expect", "to be asked. And from what I've seen I expect it to be", "for instance. And everyone is probably willing to admit more precision is better", "standards. Hospitals aren't willy nilly winging their prescriptions for instance. And everyone is", "tangentially answer the questions, or just snark. And a simpler rule set \"No", "going to be helpful. Then there are other similar questions being down voted", "sexism, etc.\" could just as easily create that sort of environment. This question", "every organization has to answer. The most meta of questions to be asked.", "simpler rule set \"No cursing, no racism, sexism, etc.\" could just as easily", "is to exclude rude and offensive behavior and to create a welcoming environment,", "after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi) If the purpose is to form a consistently high", "winging their prescriptions for instance. And everyone is probably willing to admit more", "weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi) If the purpose is to form a consistently", "when you have not received a response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi)", "is better than less, and more solutions are more valuable than few solutions.", "there are other similar questions being down voted as too broad. For example", "measuring whether your judges are doing their job?\" or \"How are you ensuring", "about as basic meta as it gets. How to check internal measurements of", "This question is about as basic meta as it gets. How to check", "program to select. +4 up votes. Right below it <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen> Another shopping question", "to answer emails that have almost nothing to do with academia being highly", "are doing their job?\" or \"How are you ensuring that your democracy is", "how to respond to emails dealing with research paper submissions being down voted", "Obvious insults may be quickly deleted but the questions are frequently met with", "I don't really see that either. Obvious insults may be quickly deleted but", "nothing to do with academia being highly prioritized. [How to deal with an", "be different depending on who's viewing your question. If the purpose is to", "more precision is better than less, and more solutions are more valuable than", "measurements of standards. Every serious company has constant checks on their standards. Hospitals", "always leads to flawed decision making. This is a simple question \"How are", "inconsistently enforced rules, dismissive links to solutions that only tangentially answer the questions,", "willing to admit more precision is better than less, and more solutions are", "of the question have some sort of bickering on what's appropriate. There are", "a simple question \"How are you measuring whether your judges are doing their", "consistently high standard, how are you ensuring that you're meeting that goal? Because", "when there's an infinite number of potential answers, and no one can guarantee", "needs of the community?\" that every organization has to answer. The most meta", "form a consistently high standard, how are you ensuring that you're meeting that", "their standards. Hospitals aren't willy nilly winging their prescriptions for instance. And everyone", "what's appropriate. There are questions as open ended as \"What should I do", "research paper submissions being down voted and ignored. [What to do when you", "meeting the needs of the community?\" that every organization has to answer. The", "set \"No cursing, no racism, sexism, etc.\" could just as easily create that", "an inappropriate greeting in an email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email) And another question about how to respond", "environment. This question is about as basic meta as it gets. How to", "a consistently high standard, how are you ensuring that you're meeting that goal?", "And another question about how to respond to emails dealing with research paper", "flawed decision making. This is a simple question \"How are you measuring whether", "a welcoming environment, I don't really see that either. Obvious insults may be", "question about how to respond to emails dealing with research paper submissions being", "too broad. For example [Should I prefer PhD programs with \"higher quality\" students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students)", "I do with my academic career\" being up voted, when there's an infinite", "not received a response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi) If the purpose", "of environment. This question is about as basic meta as it gets. How", "decide value are never perfect. Elevating individuals to judge others always leads to", "questions about how to answer emails that have almost nothing to do with", "goal? Because that goal appears to be different depending on who's viewing your", "response is going to be helpful. Then there are other similar questions being", "\"No cursing, no racism, sexism, etc.\" could just as easily create that sort", "ensuring that your democracy is meeting the needs of the community?\" that every", "the needs of the community?\" that every organization has to answer. The most", "dismissive links to solutions that only tangentially answer the questions, or just snark.", "questions to be asked. And from what I've seen I expect it to", "This is a simple question \"How are you measuring whether your judges are", "either. Obvious insults may be quickly deleted but the questions are frequently met", "ensuring that you're meeting that goal? Because that goal appears to be different", "them. Democracies where voters get to decide value are never perfect. Elevating individuals", "with inconsistently enforced rules, dismissive links to solutions that only tangentially answer the", "asked. And from what I've seen I expect it to be down voted.", "everyone is probably willing to admit more precision is better than less, and", "have some sort of bickering on what's appropriate. There are questions as open", "valuable than few solutions. No one wants enough variability in their anesthesia to", "voted as too broad. For example [Should I prefer PhD programs with \"higher", "variability in their anesthesia to kill them. Democracies where voters get to decide", "do with my academic career\" being up voted, when there's an infinite number", "being up voted, when there's an infinite number of potential answers, and no", "enforced rules, dismissive links to solutions that only tangentially answer the questions, or", "to respond to emails dealing with research paper submissions being down voted and", "Is a shopping question on what phd program to select. +4 up votes.", "For example [Should I prefer PhD programs with \"higher quality\" students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students) Is a", "standard, how are you ensuring that you're meeting that goal? Because that goal", "on what's appropriate. There are questions as open ended as \"What should I", "Because that goal appears to be different depending on who's viewing your question.", "-4 down votes. There are social etiquette questions about how to answer emails", "solutions. No one wants enough variability in their anesthesia to kill them. Democracies", "I prefer PhD programs with \"higher quality\" students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students) Is a shopping question on", "response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi) If the purpose is to form", "as basic meta as it gets. How to check internal measurements of standards.", "never perfect. Elevating individuals to judge others always leads to flawed decision making.", "purpose is to form a consistently high standard, how are you ensuring that", "question. If the purpose is to exclude rude and offensive behavior and to", "gets. How to check internal measurements of standards. Every serious company has constant", "solutions are more valuable than few solutions. No one wants enough variability in", "or just snark. And a simpler rule set \"No cursing, no racism, sexism,", "No one wants enough variability in their anesthesia to kill them. Democracies where", "that every organization has to answer. The most meta of questions to be", "be quickly deleted but the questions are frequently met with inconsistently enforced rules,", "enough variability in their anesthesia to kill them. Democracies where voters get to", "being down voted and ignored. [What to do when you have not received", "social etiquette questions about how to answer emails that have almost nothing to", "aren't willy nilly winging their prescriptions for instance. And everyone is probably willing", "Right below it <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen> Another shopping question on what phd program to select.", "up votes. Right below it <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen> Another shopping question on what phd program", "more solutions are more valuable than few solutions. No one wants enough variability", "more valuable than few solutions. No one wants enough variability in their anesthesia", "shopping question on what phd program to select. -4 down votes. There are", "to admit more precision is better than less, and more solutions are more", "a shopping question on what phd program to select. +4 up votes. Right", "others always leads to flawed decision making. This is a simple question \"How", "some sort of bickering on what's appropriate. There are questions as open ended", "below it <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen> Another shopping question on what phd program to select. -4", "Democracies where voters get to decide value are never perfect. Elevating individuals to", "on what phd program to select. -4 down votes. There are social etiquette", "individuals to judge others always leads to flawed decision making. This is a", "create a welcoming environment, I don't really see that either. Obvious insults may", "are frequently met with inconsistently enforced rules, dismissive links to solutions that only", "+4 up votes. Right below it <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen> Another shopping question on what phd", "bickering on what's appropriate. There are questions as open ended as \"What should", "to check internal measurements of standards. Every serious company has constant checks on", "If the purpose is to form a consistently high standard, how are you", "to judge others always leads to flawed decision making. This is a simple", "appropriate. There are questions as open ended as \"What should I do with", "prefer PhD programs with \"higher quality\" students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students) Is a shopping question on what", "are other similar questions being down voted as too broad. For example [Should", "in their anesthesia to kill them. Democracies where voters get to decide value", "an email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email) And another question about how to respond to emails dealing with", "academic career\" being up voted, when there's an infinite number of potential answers,", "down votes. There are social etiquette questions about how to answer emails that", "down voted as too broad. For example [Should I prefer PhD programs with", "that goal appears to be different depending on who's viewing your question. If", "answer the questions, or just snark. And a simpler rule set \"No cursing,", "simple question \"How are you measuring whether your judges are doing their job?\"", "rules, dismissive links to solutions that only tangentially answer the questions, or just", "constant checks on their standards. Hospitals aren't willy nilly winging their prescriptions for", "as open ended as \"What should I do with my academic career\" being", "their anesthesia to kill them. Democracies where voters get to decide value are", "there's an infinite number of potential answers, and no one can guarantee that", "being highly prioritized. [How to deal with an inappropriate greeting in an email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email)", "appears to be different depending on who's viewing your question. If the purpose", "deal with an inappropriate greeting in an email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email) And another question about how", "no one can guarantee that the response is going to be helpful. Then", "being down voted as too broad. For example [Should I prefer PhD programs", "what phd program to select. +4 up votes. Right below it <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen> Another", "who's viewing your question. If the purpose is to exclude rude and offensive", "what phd program to select. -4 down votes. There are social etiquette questions", "similar questions being down voted as too broad. For example [Should I prefer", "with \"higher quality\" students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students) Is a shopping question on what phd program to", "phd program to select. -4 down votes. There are social etiquette questions about", "solutions that only tangentially answer the questions, or just snark. And a simpler", "have not received a response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi) If the", "\"How are you measuring whether your judges are doing their job?\" or \"How", "of the community?\" that every organization has to answer. The most meta of", "may be quickly deleted but the questions are frequently met with inconsistently enforced", "quickly deleted but the questions are frequently met with inconsistently enforced rules, dismissive", "that the response is going to be helpful. Then there are other similar", "There are social etiquette questions about how to answer emails that have almost", "rule set \"No cursing, no racism, sexism, etc.\" could just as easily create", "anesthesia to kill them. Democracies where voters get to decide value are never", "easily create that sort of environment. This question is about as basic meta", "should I do with my academic career\" being up voted, when there's an", "open ended as \"What should I do with my academic career\" being up", "to answer. The most meta of questions to be asked. And from what", "Probably half of the question have some sort of bickering on what's appropriate.", "to deal with an inappropriate greeting in an email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email) And another question about", "[How to deal with an inappropriate greeting in an email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email) And another question", "the response is going to be helpful. Then there are other similar questions", "Hospitals aren't willy nilly winging their prescriptions for instance. And everyone is probably", "submissions being down voted and ignored. [What to do when you have not", "are you ensuring that you're meeting that goal? Because that goal appears to", "of potential answers, and no one can guarantee that the response is going", "meta as it gets. How to check internal measurements of standards. Every serious", "your judges are doing their job?\" or \"How are you ensuring that your", "of standards. Every serious company has constant checks on their standards. Hospitals aren't", "their prescriptions for instance. And everyone is probably willing to admit more precision", "about how to respond to emails dealing with research paper submissions being down", "PhD programs with \"higher quality\" students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students) Is a shopping question on what phd", "And a simpler rule set \"No cursing, no racism, sexism, etc.\" could just", "can guarantee that the response is going to be helpful. Then there are", "the question have some sort of bickering on what's appropriate. There are questions", "that you're meeting that goal? Because that goal appears to be different depending", "to create a welcoming environment, I don't really see that either. Obvious insults", "see that either. Obvious insults may be quickly deleted but the questions are", "are more valuable than few solutions. No one wants enough variability in their", "are questions as open ended as \"What should I do with my academic", "\"What should I do with my academic career\" being up voted, when there's", "that goal? Because that goal appears to be different depending on who's viewing", "is meeting the needs of the community?\" that every organization has to answer.", "almost nothing to do with academia being highly prioritized. [How to deal with", "is going to be helpful. Then there are other similar questions being down", "etiquette questions about how to answer emails that have almost nothing to do", "votes. Right below it <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen> Another shopping question on what phd program to", "\"higher quality\" students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students) Is a shopping question on what phd program to select.", "cursing, no racism, sexism, etc.\" could just as easily create that sort of", "it gets. How to check internal measurements of standards. Every serious company has", "answer emails that have almost nothing to do with academia being highly prioritized.", "the questions, or just snark. And a simpler rule set \"No cursing, no", "How to check internal measurements of standards. Every serious company has constant checks", "of questions to be asked. And from what I've seen I expect it", "you're meeting that goal? Because that goal appears to be different depending on", "making. This is a simple question \"How are you measuring whether your judges", "met with inconsistently enforced rules, dismissive links to solutions that only tangentially answer", "If the purpose is to exclude rude and offensive behavior and to create", "and to create a welcoming environment, I don't really see that either. Obvious", "one wants enough variability in their anesthesia to kill them. Democracies where voters", "as \"What should I do with my academic career\" being up voted, when", "Every serious company has constant checks on their standards. Hospitals aren't willy nilly", "that either. Obvious insults may be quickly deleted but the questions are frequently", "decision making. This is a simple question \"How are you measuring whether your", "willy nilly winging their prescriptions for instance. And everyone is probably willing to", "an infinite number of potential answers, and no one can guarantee that the", "value are never perfect. Elevating individuals to judge others always leads to flawed", "prescriptions for instance. And everyone is probably willing to admit more precision is", "voted, when there's an infinite number of potential answers, and no one can", "precision is better than less, and more solutions are more valuable than few", "how are you ensuring that you're meeting that goal? Because that goal appears", "it <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen> Another shopping question on what phd program to select. -4 down", "exclude rude and offensive behavior and to create a welcoming environment, I don't", "example [Should I prefer PhD programs with \"higher quality\" students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students) Is a shopping", "welcoming environment, I don't really see that either. Obvious insults may be quickly", "prioritized. [How to deal with an inappropriate greeting in an email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email) And another", "a response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi) If the purpose is to", "better than less, and more solutions are more valuable than few solutions. No", "submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi) If the purpose is to form a consistently high standard,", "that your democracy is meeting the needs of the community?\" that every organization", "is to form a consistently high standard, how are you ensuring that you're", "other similar questions being down voted as too broad. For example [Should I", "to flawed decision making. This is a simple question \"How are you measuring", "less, and more solutions are more valuable than few solutions. No one wants", "that sort of environment. This question is about as basic meta as it", "with research paper submissions being down voted and ignored. [What to do when", "nilly winging their prescriptions for instance. And everyone is probably willing to admit", "is probably willing to admit more precision is better than less, and more", "received a response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi) If the purpose is", "different depending on who's viewing your question. If the purpose is to exclude", "inappropriate greeting in an email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email) And another question about how to respond to", "guarantee that the response is going to be helpful. Then there are other", "you measuring whether your judges are doing their job?\" or \"How are you", "a simpler rule set \"No cursing, no racism, sexism, etc.\" could just as", "question have some sort of bickering on what's appropriate. There are questions as", "only tangentially answer the questions, or just snark. And a simpler rule set", "than few solutions. No one wants enough variability in their anesthesia to kill", "do when you have not received a response three weeks after submitting minor", "to select. +4 up votes. Right below it <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86669/phd-is-75-done-in-russia-any-options-in-europe-uk-citizen> Another shopping question on", "whether your judges are doing their job?\" or \"How are you ensuring that", "questions as open ended as \"What should I do with my academic career\"", "purpose is to exclude rude and offensive behavior and to create a welcoming", "select. -4 down votes. There are social etiquette questions about how to answer", "organization has to answer. The most meta of questions to be asked. And", "that have almost nothing to do with academia being highly prioritized. [How to", "questions are frequently met with inconsistently enforced rules, dismissive links to solutions that", "of bickering on what's appropriate. There are questions as open ended as \"What", "the purpose is to form a consistently high standard, how are you ensuring", "question on what phd program to select. +4 up votes. Right below it", "you ensuring that you're meeting that goal? Because that goal appears to be", "snark. And a simpler rule set \"No cursing, no racism, sexism, etc.\" could", "questions being down voted as too broad. For example [Should I prefer PhD", "There are questions as open ended as \"What should I do with my", "broad. For example [Should I prefer PhD programs with \"higher quality\" students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86672/should-i-prefer-phd-programs-with-higher-quality-students) Is", "create that sort of environment. This question is about as basic meta as", "Elevating individuals to judge others always leads to flawed decision making. This is", "doing their job?\" or \"How are you ensuring that your democracy is meeting", "highly prioritized. [How to deal with an inappropriate greeting in an email?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86352/how-to-deal-with-an-inappropriate-greeting-in-an-email) And", "internal measurements of standards. Every serious company has constant checks on their standards.", "your question. If the purpose is to exclude rude and offensive behavior and", "you have not received a response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86742/what-to-do-when-you-have-not-received-a-response-three-weeks-after-submitting-mi) If", "to be helpful. Then there are other similar questions being down voted as", "probably willing to admit more precision is better than less, and more solutions", "shopping question on what phd program to select. +4 up votes. Right below" ]
[ "to cover the basic information. * Typical comments can be avoided or at", "[Is it okay to inquire about the status of a paper when the", "avoids us reïterating the same advice again and again and is more helpful", "of the canonical question. This avoids us reïterating the same advice again and", "to the asker. Some askers may even find this question before asking and", "as: * How do I find out whether this is normal or not?", "[What to do when you have not received a response three weeks after", "question before asking and get help immediately. * Questions that are about a", "[Will it be ok if I politely enquire about a paper which is", "politely enquire about a paper which is under review for 8.5 months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734) (Note", "whether this is normal or not? * How do I decide when to", "asker to read the canonical Q&A first and editing their question accordingly. Such", "> Wait at least half a year. > > > (which is bad", "an invitee after 2 months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734) * [Will it be ok if I politely", "avoided or at least reduced by asking the asker to read the canonical", "canonical question and answer. It could cover such basics as: * How do", "downvoted into oblivion.) Most of these questions are not duplicates of each other,", "to act? * How should I act? This would have the following advantage:", "act? * How should I act? This would have the following advantage: ", "you have not received a response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734) ", "reïterating the same advice again and again and is more helpful to the", "is bad guidance in some fields with quicker review processes) + The typical", "written or downvoted into oblivion.) Most of these questions are not duplicates of", "they were deleted, badly written or downvoted into oblivion.) Most of these questions", "for this purpose, please suggest it. --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions", "under review for 8.5 months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734) (Note that this selection is probably above average", "to remind an editor about a manuscript submission still waiting for an invitee", "8.5 months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734) (Note that this selection is probably above average in quality. I", "were deleted, badly written or downvoted into oblivion.) Most of these questions are", "answers, which could be covered in a canonical question and answer. It could", "it appears to be stuck at a some stage: * [What to do", "decide when to act? * How should I act? This would have the", "questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or opposition by voting on", "it. --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can", "cover the basic information. * Typical comments can be avoided or at least", "three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734) * [Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months", "probably above average in quality. I remember many bad questions of this kind", "after 2 months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734) * [Will it be ok if I politely enquire about", "into oblivion.) Most of these questions are not duplicates of each other, because", "with quicker review processes) + The typical replies to such comments. Thus, I", "can refer the asker to the canonical Q&A to cover the basic information.", "delay in reviewing the revision of paper, Editor doesn't even answer the email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734)", "answer the email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734) * [What to do when two months after submitting a", "lot of overlap between the answers, which could be covered in a canonical", "major revision, its status is still \"Editor Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734) * [Is it rude to", "the asker to the canonical Q&A to cover the basic information. * Typical", "after submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734) * [Three month delay in reviewing the revision of paper, Editor", "is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or", "these questions are not duplicates of each other, because they differ in detail.", "could cover such basics as: * How do I find out whether this", "helpful to the asker. Some askers may even find this question before asking", "asker to the canonical Q&A to cover the basic information. * Typical comments", "basics as: * How do I find out whether this is normal or", "get a considerable amount of questions, where the asker submitted a paper to", "to some journal and gets impatient because it appears to be stuck at", "okay to inquire about the status of a paper when the online submission", "I politely enquire about a paper which is under review for 8.5 months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734)", "email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734) * [What to do when two months after submitting a major revision,", "in detail. Yet there is a lot of overlap between the answers, which", "do when two months after submitting a major revision, its status is still", "if I politely enquire about a paper which is under review for 8.5", "(Note that this selection is probably above average in quality. I remember many", "read the canonical Q&A first and editing their question accordingly. Such comments include:", "invitee after 2 months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734) * [Will it be ok if I politely enquire", "the canonical question. This avoids us reïterating the same advice again and again", "> + > > Wait at least half a year. > > >", "askers may even find this question before asking and get help immediately. ", "many bad questions of this kind which I fail to find, be it", "[Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734) [What should I do,", "This avoids us reïterating the same advice again and again and is more", "rude to remind an editor about a manuscript submission still waiting for an", "which is under review for 8.5 months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734) (Note that this selection is probably", "the asker submitted a paper to some journal and gets impatient because it", "still \"Editor Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734) * [Is it rude to remind an editor about a", "or not? * How do I decide when to act? * How should", "situation can focus on this. We can refer the asker to the canonical", "replies to such comments. Thus, I am proposing to create such a canonical", "How do I find out whether this is normal or not? * How", "is normal or not? * How do I decide when to act? ", "some stage: [What to do when you have not received a response", "* How do I decide when to act? * How should I act?", "stage: * [What to do when you have not received a response three", "remind an editor about a manuscript submission still waiting for an invitee after", "special, interesting situation can focus on this. We can refer the asker to", "* [What to do when you have not received a response three weeks", "each other, because they differ in detail. Yet there is a lot of", "impatient because it appears to be stuck at a some stage: * [What", "it rude to remind an editor about a manuscript submission still waiting for", "duplicate of the canonical question. This avoids us reïterating the same advice again", "asker. Some askers may even find this question before asking and get help", "again and again and is more helpful to the asker. Some askers may", "be ok if I politely enquire about a paper which is under review", "> > (which is bad guidance in some fields with quicker review processes)", "which could be covered in a canonical question and answer. It could cover", "reduced by asking the asker to read the canonical Q&A first and editing", "help immediately. * Questions that are about a special, interesting situation can focus", "a lot of overlap between the answers, which could be covered in a", "which I fail to find, be it because they were deleted, badly written", "to such comments. Thus, I am proposing to create such a canonical question", "review after 1 year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734) * [Is it okay to inquire about the status", "detail. Yet there is a lot of overlap between the answers, which could", "to do when you have not received a response three weeks after submitting", "minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734) * [Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734) * [What", "canonical Q&A first and editing their question accordingly. Such comments include: + >", "deleted, badly written or downvoted into oblivion.) Most of these questions are not", "system shows no update three months after submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734) * [Three month delay in", "not received a response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734) * [Article awaiting", "is your field? > > > + > > Wait at least half", "advice can be closed as a duplicate of the canonical question. This avoids", "[What to do when two months after submitting a major revision, its status", "year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734) * [Is it okay to inquire about the status of a paper", "about a special, interesting situation can focus on this. We can refer the", "still waiting for an invitee after 2 months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734) * [Will it be ok", "at a some stage: * [What to do when you have not received", "be covered in a canonical question and answer. It could cover such basics", "and answer. If you think that an existing question is already suitable for", "tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or opposition by voting on the", "refer the asker to the canonical Q&A to cover the basic information. ", "a canonical question and answer. It could cover such basics as: How", "should I do, as my submitted paper is still under review after 1", "Editor doesn't even answer the email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734) * [What to do when two months", "this question before asking and get help immediately. * Questions that are about", "on this. We can refer the asker to the canonical Q&A to cover", "canonical question and answer. If you think that an existing question is already", "manuscript submission still waiting for an invitee after 2 months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734) * [Will it", "> > + > > Wait at least half a year. > >", "proposing to create such a canonical question and answer. If you think that", "months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734) (Note that this selection is probably above average in quality. I remember", "+ The typical replies to such comments. Thus, I am proposing to create", "received a response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734) * [Article awaiting reviewer", "canonical Q&A to cover the basic information. * Typical comments can be avoided", "of this kind which I fail to find, be it because they were", "purpose, please suggest it. --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"),", "about a paper which is under review for 8.5 months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734) (Note that this", "a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or opposition", "I remember many bad questions of this kind which I fail to find,", "even find this question before asking and get help immediately. * Questions that", "the online submission system shows no update three months after submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734) * [Three", "think that an existing question is already suitable for this purpose, please suggest", "questions are not duplicates of each other, because they differ in detail. Yet", "of overlap between the answers, which could be covered in a canonical question", "of this type where we can answer nothing but general advice can be", "6 months after submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734) * [What should I do, as my submitted paper", "of these questions are not duplicates of each other, because they differ in", "weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734) * [Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after", "I do, as my submitted paper is still under review after 1 year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734)", "and get help immediately. * Questions that are about a special, interesting situation", "comments include: + > > What is your field? > > > +", "remember many bad questions of this kind which I fail to find, be", "Questions that are about a special, interesting situation can focus on this. We", "are not duplicates of each other, because they differ in detail. Yet there", "would have the following advantage: * Basic questions of this type where we", "--- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate", "* [Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734) * [What should I", "Most of these questions are not duplicates of each other, because they differ", "its status is still \"Editor Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734) * [Is it rude to remind an", "is still under review after 1 year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734) * [Is it okay to inquire", "such basics as: * How do I find out whether this is normal", "may even find this question before asking and get help immediately. * Questions", "such a canonical question and answer. If you think that an existing question", "How do I decide when to act? * How should I act? This", "paper to some journal and gets impatient because it appears to be stuck", "some fields with quicker review processes) + The typical replies to such comments.", "of questions, where the asker submitted a paper to some journal and gets", "* [Is it okay to inquire about the status of a paper when", "for an invitee after 2 months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734) * [Will it be ok if I", "a paper to some journal and gets impatient because it appears to be", "Some askers may even find this question before asking and get help immediately.", "[What should I do, as my submitted paper is still under review after", "suggest it. --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you", "months after submitting a major revision, its status is still \"Editor Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734) ", "this purpose, please suggest it. --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged", "journal and gets impatient because it appears to be stuck at a some", "this type where we can answer nothing but general advice can be closed", "three months after submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734) [Three month delay in reviewing the revision of", "month delay in reviewing the revision of paper, Editor doesn't even answer the", "such comments. Thus, I am proposing to create such a canonical question and", "> What is your field? > > > + > > Wait at", "a manuscript submission still waiting for an invitee after 2 months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734) * [Will", "field? > > > + > > Wait at least half a year.", "year. > > > (which is bad guidance in some fields with quicker", "do, as my submitted paper is still under review after 1 year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734) ", "Wait at least half a year. > > > (which is bad guidance", "the revision of paper, Editor doesn't even answer the email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734) [What to", "answer. If you think that an existing question is already suitable for this", "> (which is bad guidance in some fields with quicker review processes) +", "+ > > Wait at least half a year. > > > (which", "amount of questions, where the asker submitted a paper to some journal and", "question is already suitable for this purpose, please suggest it. --- This is", "suitable for this purpose, please suggest it. --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show", "find out whether this is normal or not? * How do I decide", "question accordingly. Such comments include: + > > What is your field? >", "half a year. > > > (which is bad guidance in some fields", "Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734) * [Is it rude to remind an editor about a manuscript submission", "reviewing the revision of paper, Editor doesn't even answer the email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734) * [What", "after submitting a major revision, its status is still \"Editor Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734) * [Is", "This would have the following advantage: * Basic questions of this type where", "before asking and get help immediately. * Questions that are about a special,", "it because they were deleted, badly written or downvoted into oblivion.) Most of", "or at least reduced by asking the asker to read the canonical Q&A", "a year. > > > (which is bad guidance in some fields with", "their question accordingly. Such comments include: + > > What is your field?", "to be stuck at a some stage: * [What to do when you", "> > > (which is bad guidance in some fields with quicker review", "We get a considerable amount of questions, where the asker submitted a paper", "* [Will it be ok if I politely enquire about a paper which", "cover such basics as: * How do I find out whether this is", "is a lot of overlap between the answers, which could be covered in", "considerable amount of questions, where the asker submitted a paper to some journal", "it be ok if I politely enquire about a paper which is under", "I find out whether this is normal or not? * How do I", "are about a special, interesting situation can focus on this. We can refer", "between the answers, which could be covered in a canonical question and answer.", "> > > + > > Wait at least half a year. >", "online submission system shows no update three months after submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734) * [Three month", "a major revision, its status is still \"Editor Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734) * [Is it rude", "fail to find, be it because they were deleted, badly written or downvoted", "but general advice can be closed as a duplicate of the canonical question.", "can be closed as a duplicate of the canonical question. This avoids us", "paper, Editor doesn't even answer the email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734) * [What to do when two", "is more helpful to the asker. Some askers may even find this question", "you think that an existing question is already suitable for this purpose, please", "gets impatient because it appears to be stuck at a some stage: ", "an editor about a manuscript submission still waiting for an invitee after 2", "other, because they differ in detail. Yet there is a lot of overlap", "where we can answer nothing but general advice can be closed as a", "to inquire about the status of a paper when the online submission system", "about the status of a paper when the online submission system shows no", "immediately. Questions that are about a special, interesting situation can focus on", "be it because they were deleted, badly written or downvoted into oblivion.) Most", "1 year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734) * [Is it okay to inquire about the status of a", "that are about a special, interesting situation can focus on this. We can", "following advantage: * Basic questions of this type where we can answer nothing", "basic information. * Typical comments can be avoided or at least reduced by", "as a duplicate of the canonical question. This avoids us reïterating the same", "in reviewing the revision of paper, Editor doesn't even answer the email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734) ", "to create such a canonical question and answer. If you think that an", "kind which I fail to find, be it because they were deleted, badly", "update three months after submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734) [Three month delay in reviewing the revision", "selection is probably above average in quality. I remember many bad questions of", "least reduced by asking the asker to read the canonical Q&A first and", "We can refer the asker to the canonical Q&A to cover the basic", "a duplicate of the canonical question. This avoids us reïterating the same advice", "interesting situation can focus on this. We can refer the asker to the", "under review after 1 year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734) * [Is it okay to inquire about the", "or downvoted into oblivion.) Most of these questions are not duplicates of each", "covered in a canonical question and answer. It could cover such basics as:", "If you think that an existing question is already suitable for this purpose,", "the asker to read the canonical Q&A first and editing their question accordingly.", "ok if I politely enquire about a paper which is under review for", "quicker review processes) + The typical replies to such comments. Thus, I am", "already suitable for this purpose, please suggest it. --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request", "when you have not received a response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734)", "doesn't even answer the email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734) * [What to do when two months after", "can answer nothing but general advice can be closed as a duplicate of", "How should I act? This would have the following advantage: * Basic questions", "invitation 6 months after submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734) * [What should I do, as my submitted", "* [Is it rude to remind an editor about a manuscript submission still", "be closed as a duplicate of the canonical question. This avoids us reïterating", "comments can be avoided or at least reduced by asking the asker to", "processes) + The typical replies to such comments. Thus, I am proposing to", "general advice can be closed as a duplicate of the canonical question. This", "closed as a duplicate of the canonical question. This avoids us reïterating the", "> > Wait at least half a year. > > > (which is", "where the asker submitted a paper to some journal and gets impatient because", "> > What is your field? > > > + > > Wait", "is under review for 8.5 months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734) (Note that this selection is probably above", "editor about a manuscript submission still waiting for an invitee after 2 months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734)", "when two months after submitting a major revision, its status is still \"Editor", "average in quality. I remember many bad questions of this kind which I", "information. * Typical comments can be avoided or at least reduced by asking", "advantage: * Basic questions of this type where we can answer nothing but", "it okay to inquire about the status of a paper when the online", "have not received a response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734) * [Article", "is still \"Editor Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734) * [Is it rude to remind an editor about", "do I decide when to act? * How should I act? This would", "your field? > > > + > > Wait at least half a", "* [What to do when two months after submitting a major revision, its", "by asking the asker to read the canonical Q&A first and editing their", "reviewer invitation 6 months after submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734) * [What should I do, as my", "about a manuscript submission still waiting for an invitee after 2 months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734) ", "can focus on this. We can refer the asker to the canonical Q&A", "is already suitable for this purpose, please suggest it. --- This is a", "status of a paper when the online submission system shows no update three", "What is your field? > > > + > > Wait at least", "the canonical Q&A first and editing their question accordingly. Such comments include: +", "of each other, because they differ in detail. Yet there is a lot", "badly written or downvoted into oblivion.) Most of these questions are not duplicates", "question and answer. If you think that an existing question is already suitable", "asker submitted a paper to some journal and gets impatient because it appears", "out whether this is normal or not? How do I decide when", "to read the canonical Q&A first and editing their question accordingly. Such comments", "for 8.5 months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734) (Note that this selection is probably above average in quality.", "answer nothing but general advice can be closed as a duplicate of the", "the asker. Some askers may even find this question before asking and get", "to the canonical Q&A to cover the basic information. * Typical comments can", "(which is bad guidance in some fields with quicker review processes) + The", "\"Editor Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734) * [Is it rude to remind an editor about a manuscript", "not? * How do I decide when to act? * How should I", "the same advice again and again and is more helpful to the asker.", "* How should I act? This would have the following advantage: * Basic", "stuck at a some stage: * [What to do when you have not", "first and editing their question accordingly. Such comments include: + > > What", "It could cover such basics as: * How do I find out whether", "I decide when to act? * How should I act? This would have", "an existing question is already suitable for this purpose, please suggest it. ---", "paper when the online submission system shows no update three months after submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734)", "and gets impatient because it appears to be stuck at a some stage:", "Yet there is a lot of overlap between the answers, which could be", "us reïterating the same advice again and again and is more helpful to", "the status of a paper when the online submission system shows no update", "in quality. I remember many bad questions of this kind which I fail", "when to act? * How should I act? This would have the following", "response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734) * [Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6", "a paper which is under review for 8.5 months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734) (Note that this selection", "my submitted paper is still under review after 1 year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734) * [Is it", "least half a year. > > > (which is bad guidance in some", "please suggest it. --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e.,", "no update three months after submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734) * [Three month delay in reviewing the", "this. We can refer the asker to the canonical Q&A to cover the", "appears to be stuck at a some stage: * [What to do when", "months after submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734) * [What should I do, as my submitted paper is", "Q&A to cover the basic information. * Typical comments can be avoided or", "do I find out whether this is normal or not? * How do", "the canonical Q&A to cover the basic information. * Typical comments can be", "this is normal or not? * How do I decide when to act?", "inquire about the status of a paper when the online submission system shows", "there is a lot of overlap between the answers, which could be covered", "comments. Thus, I am proposing to create such a canonical question and answer.", "to find, be it because they were deleted, badly written or downvoted into", "quality. I remember many bad questions of this kind which I fail to", "as my submitted paper is still under review after 1 year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734) * [Is", "bad guidance in some fields with quicker review processes) + The typical replies", "some journal and gets impatient because it appears to be stuck at a", "questions of this kind which I fail to find, be it because they", "submission still waiting for an invitee after 2 months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734) * [Will it be", "more helpful to the asker. Some askers may even find this question before", "* How do I find out whether this is normal or not? ", "guidance in some fields with quicker review processes) + The typical replies to", "focus on this. We can refer the asker to the canonical Q&A to", "months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734) [Will it be ok if I politely enquire about a paper", "create such a canonical question and answer. If you think that an existing", "a considerable amount of questions, where the asker submitted a paper to some", "of a paper when the online submission system shows no update three months", "can be avoided or at least reduced by asking the asker to read", "Thus, I am proposing to create such a canonical question and answer. If", "after 1 year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734) * [Is it okay to inquire about the status of", "above average in quality. I remember many bad questions of this kind which", "paper which is under review for 8.5 months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734) (Note that this selection is", "should I act? This would have the following advantage: * Basic questions of", "asking and get help immediately. * Questions that are about a special, interesting", "and again and is more helpful to the asker. Some askers may even", "this selection is probably above average in quality. I remember many bad questions", "fields with quicker review processes) + The typical replies to such comments. Thus,", "include: + > > What is your field? > > > + >", "questions, where the asker submitted a paper to some journal and gets impatient", "the email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734) * [What to do when two months after submitting a major", "paper is still under review after 1 year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734) * [Is it okay to", "This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval", "differ in detail. Yet there is a lot of overlap between the answers,", "enquire about a paper which is under review for 8.5 months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734) (Note that", "submission system shows no update three months after submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734) * [Three month delay", "a some stage: * [What to do when you have not received a", "we can answer nothing but general advice can be closed as a duplicate", "review for 8.5 months](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/85280/7734) (Note that this selection is probably above average in", "act? This would have the following advantage: * Basic questions of this type", "* [Three month delay in reviewing the revision of paper, Editor doesn't even", "because they differ in detail. Yet there is a lot of overlap between", "shows no update three months after submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734) * [Three month delay in reviewing", "I am proposing to create such a canonical question and answer. If you", "two months after submitting a major revision, its status is still \"Editor Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734)", "a canonical question and answer. If you think that an existing question is", "am proposing to create such a canonical question and answer. If you think", "a special, interesting situation can focus on this. We can refer the asker", "submitting a major revision, its status is still \"Editor Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734) * [Is it", "revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734) * [Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734) * [What should", "be stuck at a some stage: * [What to do when you have", "after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734) * [Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734)", "question and answer. It could cover such basics as: * How do I", "and is more helpful to the asker. Some askers may even find this", "is probably above average in quality. I remember many bad questions of this", "\"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or opposition by voting", "and editing their question accordingly. Such comments include: + > > What is", "nothing but general advice can be closed as a duplicate of the canonical", "the basic information. * Typical comments can be avoided or at least reduced", "submitted a paper to some journal and gets impatient because it appears to", "revision of paper, Editor doesn't even answer the email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734) * [What to do", "after submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734) * [What should I do, as my submitted paper is still", "have the following advantage: * Basic questions of this type where we can", "because it appears to be stuck at a some stage: * [What to", "[Three month delay in reviewing the revision of paper, Editor doesn't even answer", "same advice again and again and is more helpful to the asker. Some", "be avoided or at least reduced by asking the asker to read the", "in a canonical question and answer. It could cover such basics as: ", "because they were deleted, badly written or downvoted into oblivion.) Most of these", "'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or opposition by voting on the question.", "find this question before asking and get help immediately. Questions that are", "awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734) * [What should I do, as", "[Is it rude to remind an editor about a manuscript submission still waiting", "[feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or opposition by", "I fail to find, be it because they were deleted, badly written or", "months after submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734) * [Three month delay in reviewing the revision of paper,", "question. This avoids us reïterating the same advice again and again and is", "asking the asker to read the canonical Q&A first and editing their question", "overlap between the answers, which could be covered in a canonical question and", "editing their question accordingly. Such comments include: + > > What is your", "I act? This would have the following advantage: * Basic questions of this", "of paper, Editor doesn't even answer the email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734) * [What to do when", "* [What should I do, as my submitted paper is still under review", "Typical comments can be avoided or at least reduced by asking the asker", "a paper when the online submission system shows no update three months after", "duplicates of each other, because they differ in detail. Yet there is a", "the following advantage: * Basic questions of this type where we can answer", "* Typical comments can be avoided or at least reduced by asking the", "revision, its status is still \"Editor Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734) * [Is it rude to remind", "oblivion.) Most of these questions are not duplicates of each other, because they", "in some fields with quicker review processes) + The typical replies to such", "submitted paper is still under review after 1 year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734) * [Is it okay", "find, be it because they were deleted, badly written or downvoted into oblivion.)", "review processes) + The typical replies to such comments. Thus, I am proposing", "at least half a year. > > > (which is bad guidance in", "existing question is already suitable for this purpose, please suggest it. --- This", "and answer. It could cover such basics as: * How do I find", "Q&A first and editing their question accordingly. Such comments include: + > >", "do when you have not received a response three weeks after submitting minor", "could be covered in a canonical question and answer. It could cover such", "answer. It could cover such basics as: * How do I find out", "questions of this type where we can answer nothing but general advice can", "advice again and again and is more helpful to the asker. Some askers", "they differ in detail. Yet there is a lot of overlap between the", "* Basic questions of this type where we can answer nothing but general", "* Questions that are about a special, interesting situation can focus on this.", "at least reduced by asking the asker to read the canonical Q&A first", "waiting for an invitee after 2 months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734) * [Will it be ok if", "again and is more helpful to the asker. Some askers may even find", "Basic questions of this type where we can answer nothing but general advice", "when the online submission system shows no update three months after submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734) ", "get help immediately. Questions that are about a special, interesting situation can", "the answers, which could be covered in a canonical question and answer. It", "even answer the email](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/34648/7734) * [What to do when two months after submitting", "bad questions of this kind which I fail to find, be it because", "2 months?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/80043/7734) * [Will it be ok if I politely enquire about a", "submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734) * [What should I do, as my submitted paper is still under", "+ > > What is your field? > > > + > >", "that this selection is probably above average in quality. I remember many bad", "normal or not? * How do I decide when to act? * How", "a response three weeks after submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734) * [Article awaiting reviewer invitation", "Such comments include: + > > What is your field? > > >", "accordingly. Such comments include: + > > What is your field? > >", "submission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/24162/7734) * [Three month delay in reviewing the revision of paper, Editor doesn't", "status is still \"Editor Assigned\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72608/7734) * [Is it rude to remind an editor", "that an existing question is already suitable for this purpose, please suggest it.", "this kind which I fail to find, be it because they were deleted,", "canonical question. This avoids us reïterating the same advice again and again and", "type where we can answer nothing but general advice can be closed as", "still under review after 1 year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66219/7734) * [Is it okay to inquire about", "not duplicates of each other, because they differ in detail. Yet there is", "submitting minor revisions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86742/7734) * [Article awaiting reviewer invitation 6 months after submission](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/18543/7734) *", "typical replies to such comments. Thus, I am proposing to create such a", "to do when two months after submitting a major revision, its status is", "The typical replies to such comments. Thus, I am proposing to create such" ]
[ "to be a lot of disagreement as to whether questions of type (1)", "which seek a list of objective facts, with entries of the list each", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/88915/which-academic-conferences-have-more-4-000-attendees) was closed for shopping. However, how shopping is [described](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) on meta does", "an equally valid yet incomplete part of the complete list. Questions of this", "that asks for an answer in list form, regardless as to the reason", "closed for shopping. However, how shopping is [described](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) on meta does not seem", "questions (1) asking for a list of objective facts related to academia [such", "such questions. While such questions may be well researched and on topic, other", "While such questions may be well researched and on topic, other formats are", "off-topic here > > > Note that the word \"shopping\" applied to (1)", "is nearly identical in flavor to mine was reopened on Academia Stack Exchange", "think shopping has too negative of a connotation if we are going to", "reason in it\". Should we have two close reasons list asking and shopping.", "incomplete part of the complete list. Questions of this form are unlikely to", "more explicit and include a \"for any reason in it\". Should we have", "list asking close reason could go something like as follows > > \"List", "> \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs,", "disagreement as to whether questions of type (1) are shopping. For example, [this", "Therefore it is difficult to upvote and downvote the partial answers to such", "#of attendees at academic conferences] and (2) asking for a subjective list of", "three possible characteristics of a shopping question, each of which my question does", "which is nearly identical in flavor to mine was reopened on Academia Stack", "valid yet incomplete part of the complete list. Questions of this form are", "is asking for an opinion, which is simply not correct. There seems to", "a connotation if we are going to use it to close questions of", "are two very different types/interpretations of shopping questions (1) asking for a list", "word \"shopping\" applied to (1) is a bit offensive, it implies the question", "(1) are shopping. For example, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915), which is nearly identical in flavor", "or seek an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here > >", "this site. This is because each answer would be an equally valid yet", "> > > I think shopping has too negative of a connotation if", "the question and is asking for an opinion, which is simply not correct.", "there are two very different types/interpretations of shopping questions (1) asking for a", "conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping) which classified it as not shopping. If we are to say that", "lot of disagreement as to whether questions of type (1) are shopping. For", "it implies the question asker didn't simply google the question and is asking", "if we are going to use it to close questions of people who", "would be an equally valid yet incomplete part of the complete list. Questions", "example, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915), which is nearly identical in flavor to mine was reopened", "each of which my question does not satisfy. It seems like there are", "likely contributed by a different community member, are not well suited for this", "The description of the list asking close reason could go something like as", "a subjective list of rankings for comparison. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek", "Academia Stack Exchange after a [meta conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping) which classified it as not shopping.", "it\". Should we have two close reasons list asking and shopping. The description", "are unlikely to receive a complete list/answer by a single user. Therefore it", "which is simply not correct. There seems to be a lot of disagreement", "to say that any question that asks for an answer in list form,", "part of the complete list. Questions of this form are unlikely to receive", "yet incomplete part of the complete list. Questions of this form are unlikely", "an answer in list form, regardless as to the reason one would want", "(2) asking for a subjective list of rankings for comparison. > > \"Shopping\"", "the reason one would want a list, the close reason should be more", "are off-topic here > > > Note that the word \"shopping\" applied to", "difficult to upvote and downvote the partial answers to such questions. *While such", "answer in list form, regardless as to the reason one would want a", "description of the list asking* close reason could go something like as follows", "other formats are more appropriate for this type of question. > > >", "downvote the partial answers to such questions. While such questions may be well", "> > > Note that the word \"shopping\" applied to (1) is a", "something like as follows > > \"List asking\" questions which seek a list", "follows > > \"List asking\" questions which seek a list of objective facts,", "a shopping question, each of which my question does not satisfy. It seems", "how shopping is [described](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) on meta does not seem to match my question.", "shopping. If we are to say that any question that asks for an", "that any question that asks for an answer in list form, regardless as", "to receive a complete list/answer by a single user. Therefore it is difficult", "topic, other formats are more appropriate for this type of question.** > >", "programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar as an answer or seek an", "seems to be a lot of disagreement as to whether questions of type", "a [meta conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping) which classified it as not shopping. If we are to", "didn't simply google the question and is asking for an opinion, which is", "list asking and shopping. The description of the list asking close reason could", "or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or comparison of such,", "of such, are off-topic here > > > Note that the word \"shopping\"", "community member, are not well suited for this site. This is because each", "list of rankings for comparison. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or", "my question. The meta question I link to outlines three possible characteristics of", "to (1) is a bit offensive, it implies the question asker didn't simply", "was reopened on Academia Stack Exchange after a [meta conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping) which classified it", "\"List asking\" questions which seek a list of objective facts, with entries of", "to upvote and downvote the partial answers to such questions. *While such questions", "> Note that the word \"shopping\" applied to (1) is a bit offensive,", "asking and shopping. The description of the list asking close reason could go", "such questions may be well researched and on topic, other formats are more", "[described](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) on meta does not seem to match my question. The meta question", "to use it to close questions of people who have demonstrated considerable research", "was closed for shopping. However, how shopping is [described](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) on meta does not", "after a [meta conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping) which classified it as not shopping. If we are", "and is asking for an opinion, which is simply not correct. There seems", "because each answer would be an equally valid yet incomplete part of the", "to academia [such as my question on #of attendees at academic conferences] and", "shopping. For example, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915), which is nearly identical in flavor to mine", "question that asks for an answer in list form, regardless as to the", "receive a complete list/answer by a single user. Therefore it is difficult to", "assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here > > > Note that", "mine was reopened on Academia Stack Exchange after a [meta conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping) which classified", "asking* close reason could go something like as follows > > \"List asking\"", "for comparison. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual", "want a list, the close reason should be more explicit and include a", "similar as an answer or seek an assessment or comparison of such, are", "or comparison of such, are off-topic here > > > Note that the", "Questions of this form are unlikely to receive a complete list/answer by a", "single user. Therefore it is difficult to upvote and downvote the partial answers", "shopping question, each of which my question does not satisfy. It seems like", "like as follows > > \"List asking\" questions which seek a list of", "Recently, [my question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/88915/which-academic-conferences-have-more-4-000-attendees) was closed for shopping. However, how shopping is [described](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) on", "not correct. There seems to be a lot of disagreement as to whether", "with entries of the list each likely contributed by a different community member,", "each answer would be an equally valid yet incomplete part of the complete", "explicit and include a \"for any reason in it\". Should we have two", "\"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers,", "questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals,", "seems like there are two very different types/interpretations of shopping questions (1) asking", "it as not shopping. If we are to say that any question that", "or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar", "universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar as an answer or", "a complete list/answer by a single user. Therefore it is difficult to upvote", "complete list. Questions of this form are unlikely to receive a complete list/answer", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915), which is nearly identical in flavor to mine was reopened on Academia", "we are going to use it to close questions of people who have", "a list, the close reason should be more explicit and include a \"for", "contributed by a different community member, are not well suited for this site.", "question on #of attendees at academic conferences] and (2) asking for a subjective", "characteristics of a shopping question, each of which my question does not satisfy.", "is [described](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) on meta does not seem to match my question. The meta", "has too negative of a connotation if we are going to use it", "reasons list asking and shopping. The description of the list asking close reason", "are not well suited for this site. This is because each answer would", "applied to (1) is a bit offensive, it implies the question asker didn't", "we are to say that any question that asks for an answer in", "For example, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915), which is nearly identical in flavor to mine was", "subjective list of rankings for comparison. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations", "in it\". Should we have two close reasons list asking and shopping. The", "my question on #of attendees at academic conferences] and (2) asking for a", "have two close reasons list asking and shopping. The description of the list", "possible characteristics of a shopping question, each of which my question does not", "of the list each likely contributed by a different community member, are not", "conferences] and (2) asking for a subjective list of rankings for comparison. >", "an opinion, which is simply not correct. There seems to be a lot", "formats are more appropriate for this type of question.* > > > I", "as an answer or seek an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic", "a bit offensive, it implies the question asker didn't simply google the question", "types/interpretations of shopping questions (1) asking for a list of objective facts related", "to whether questions of type (1) are shopping. For example, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915), which", "does not satisfy. It seems like there are two very different types/interpretations of", "question does not satisfy. It seems like there are two very different types/interpretations", "questions which seek a list of objective facts, with entries of the list", "of this form are unlikely to receive a complete list/answer by a single", "simply not correct. There seems to be a lot of disagreement as to", "which classified it as not shopping. If we are to say that any", "be well researched and on topic, other formats are more appropriate for this", "it is difficult to upvote and downvote the partial answers to such questions.", "google the question and is asking for an opinion, which is simply not", "of disagreement as to whether questions of type (1) are shopping. For example,", "> > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic", "I link to outlines three possible characteristics of a shopping question, each of", "reason one would want a list, the close reason should be more explicit", "comparison of such, are off-topic here > > > Note that the word", "identical in flavor to mine was reopened on Academia Stack Exchange after a", "as follows > > \"List asking\" questions which seek a list of objective", "However, how shopping is [described](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) on meta does not seem to match my", "negative of a connotation if we are going to use it to close", "> > \"List asking\" questions which seek a list of objective facts, with", "in flavor to mine was reopened on Academia Stack Exchange after a [meta", "academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar as an answer or seek", "asking for an opinion, which is simply not correct. There seems to be", "asking for a subjective list of rankings for comparison. > > \"Shopping\" questions,", "classified it as not shopping. If we are to say that any question", "too negative of a connotation if we are going to use it to", "(1) asking for a list of objective facts related to academia [such as", "answer would be an equally valid yet incomplete part of the complete list.", "by a different community member, are not well suited for this site. This", "here > > > Note that the word \"shopping\" applied to (1) is", "an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here > > > Note", "we have two close reasons list asking and shopping. The description of the", "upvote and downvote the partial answers to such questions. While such questions may", "of objective facts, with entries of the list each likely contributed by a", "list of objective facts related to academia [such as my question on #of", "and on topic, other formats are more appropriate for this type of question.", "objective facts related to academia [such as my question on #of attendees at", "of a shopping question, each of which my question does not satisfy. It", "satisfy. It seems like there are two very different types/interpretations of shopping questions", "simply google the question and is asking for an opinion, which is simply", "include a \"for any reason in it\". Should we have two close reasons", "> I think shopping has too negative of a connotation if we are", "user. Therefore it is difficult to upvote and downvote the partial answers to", "If we are to say that any question that asks for an answer", "Should we have two close reasons list asking and shopping. The description of", "suited for this site. This is because each answer would be an equally", "the list each likely contributed by a different community member, are not well", "shopping has too negative of a connotation if we are going to use", "facts related to academia [such as my question on #of attendees at academic", "It seems like there are two very different types/interpretations of shopping questions (1)", "research topics or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or comparison", "seem to match my question. The meta question I link to outlines three", "of which my question does not satisfy. It seems like there are two", "seek an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here > > >", "> \"List asking\" questions which seek a list of objective facts, with entries", "academia [such as my question on #of attendees at academic conferences] and (2)", "Exchange after a [meta conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping) which classified it as not shopping. If we", "asking\" questions which seek a list of objective facts, with entries of the", "my question does not satisfy. It seems like there are two very different", "list form, regardless as to the reason one would want a list, the", "different community member, are not well suited for this site. This is because", "a list of objective facts related to academia [such as my question on", "academic conferences] and (2) asking for a subjective list of rankings for comparison.", "member, are not well suited for this site. This is because each answer", "two very different types/interpretations of shopping questions (1) asking for a list of", "regardless as to the reason one would want a list, the close reason", "shopping. The description of the list asking close reason could go something like", "one would want a list, the close reason should be more explicit and", "the question asker didn't simply google the question and is asking for an", "a list of objective facts, with entries of the list each likely contributed", "could go something like as follows > > \"List asking\" questions which seek", "for shopping. However, how shopping is [described](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) on meta does not seem to", "link to outlines three possible characteristics of a shopping question, each of which", "shopping. However, how shopping is [described](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) on meta does not seem to match", "any reason in it\". Should we have two close reasons list asking and", "(1) is a bit offensive, it implies the question asker didn't simply google", "questions of type (1) are shopping. For example, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915), which is nearly", "of shopping questions (1) asking for a list of objective facts related to", "rankings for comparison. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of", "of objective facts related to academia [such as my question on #of attendees", "a lot of disagreement as to whether questions of type (1) are shopping.", "implies the question asker didn't simply google the question and is asking for", "be more explicit and include a \"for any reason in it\". Should we", "well researched and on topic, other formats are more appropriate for this type", "meta question I link to outlines three possible characteristics of a shopping question,", "and (2) asking for a subjective list of rankings for comparison. > >", "objective facts, with entries of the list each likely contributed by a different", "very different types/interpretations of shopping questions (1) asking for a list of objective", "match my question. The meta question I link to outlines three possible characteristics", "on #of attendees at academic conferences] and (2) asking for a subjective list", "are shopping. For example, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915), which is nearly identical in flavor to", "any question that asks for an answer in list form, regardless as to", "are going to use it to close questions of people who have demonstrated", "the close reason should be more explicit and include a \"for any reason", "The meta question I link to outlines three possible characteristics of a shopping", "close reason should be more explicit and include a \"for any reason in", "the complete list. Questions of this form are unlikely to receive a complete", "reason should be more explicit and include a \"for any reason in it\".", "type (1) are shopping. For example, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915), which is nearly identical in", "Note that the word \"shopping\" applied to (1) is a bit offensive, it", "of a connotation if we are going to use it to close questions", "attendees at academic conferences] and (2) asking for a subjective list of rankings", "are more appropriate for this type of question. > > > I think", "it to close questions of people who have demonstrated considerable research behind their", "meta does not seem to match my question. The meta question I link", "appropriate for this type of question. > > > I think shopping has", "as to whether questions of type (1) are shopping. For example, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915),", "are to say that any question that asks for an answer in list", "of the list asking close reason could go something like as follows >", "in list form, regardless as to the reason one would want a list,", "should be more explicit and include a \"for any reason in it\". Should", "for this site. This is because each answer would be an equally valid", "and shopping. The description of the list asking close reason could go something", "say that any question that asks for an answer in list form, regardless", "questions. *While such questions may be well researched and on topic, other formats", "nearly identical in flavor to mine was reopened on Academia Stack Exchange after", "to match my question. The meta question I link to outlines three possible", "as not shopping. If we are to say that any question that asks", "I think shopping has too negative of a connotation if we are going", "list of objective facts, with entries of the list each likely contributed by", "be an equally valid yet incomplete part of the complete list. Questions of", "list. Questions of this form are unlikely to receive a complete list/answer by", "of rankings for comparison. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists", "This is because each answer would be an equally valid yet incomplete part", "be a lot of disagreement as to whether questions of type (1) are", "may be well researched and on topic, other formats are more appropriate for", "going to use it to close questions of people who have demonstrated considerable", "which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research", "connotation if we are going to use it to close questions of people", "a \"for any reason in it\". Should we have two close reasons list", "question I link to outlines three possible characteristics of a shopping question, each", "of the complete list. Questions of this form are unlikely to receive a", "answer or seek an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here >", "different types/interpretations of shopping questions (1) asking for a list of objective facts", "of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar as an", "topics or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or comparison of", "for a subjective list of rankings for comparison. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which", "asker didn't simply google the question and is asking for an opinion, which", "is difficult to upvote and downvote the partial answers to such questions. While", "list each likely contributed by a different community member, are not well suited", "> > I think shopping has too negative of a connotation if we", "this form are unlikely to receive a complete list/answer by a single user.", "question, each of which my question does not satisfy. It seems like there", "researched and on topic, other formats are more appropriate for this type of", "complete list/answer by a single user. Therefore it is difficult to upvote and", "as to the reason one would want a list, the close reason should", "would want a list, the close reason should be more explicit and include", "and include a \"for any reason in it\". Should we have two close", "each likely contributed by a different community member, are not well suited for", "and downvote the partial answers to such questions. While such questions may be", "at academic conferences] and (2) asking for a subjective list of rankings for", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915), which is nearly identical in flavor to mine was reopened on", "to the reason one would want a list, the close reason should be", "to outlines three possible characteristics of a shopping question, each of which my", "unlikely to receive a complete list/answer by a single user. Therefore it is", "is because each answer would be an equally valid yet incomplete part of", "use it to close questions of people who have demonstrated considerable research behind", "type of question. > > > I think shopping has too negative of", "form, regardless as to the reason one would want a list, the close", "more appropriate for this type of question. > > > I think shopping", "for an answer in list form, regardless as to the reason one would", "site. This is because each answer would be an equally valid yet incomplete", "\"shopping\" applied to (1) is a bit offensive, it implies the question asker", "for a list of objective facts related to academia [such as my question", "question. > > > I think shopping has too negative of a connotation", "asking for a list of objective facts related to academia [such as my", "the partial answers to such questions. While such questions may be well researched", "for an opinion, which is simply not correct. There seems to be a", "does not seem to match my question. The meta question I link to", "not satisfy. It seems like there are two very different types/interpretations of shopping", "> > Note that the word \"shopping\" applied to (1) is a bit", "correct. There seems to be a lot of disagreement as to whether questions", "not shopping. If we are to say that any question that asks for", "which my question does not satisfy. It seems like there are two very", "seek a list of objective facts, with entries of the list each likely", "is a bit offensive, it implies the question asker didn't simply google the", "question. The meta question I link to outlines three possible characteristics of a", "related to academia [such as my question on #of attendees at academic conferences]", "recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or", "bit offensive, it implies the question asker didn't simply google the question and", "not well suited for this site. This is because each answer would be", "opinion, which is simply not correct. There seems to be a lot of", "Stack Exchange after a [meta conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping) which classified it as not shopping. If", "\"for any reason in it\". Should we have two close reasons list asking", "reopened on Academia Stack Exchange after a [meta conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping) which classified it as", "is simply not correct. There seems to be a lot of disagreement as", "outlines three possible characteristics of a shopping question, each of which my question", "answers to such questions. While such questions may be well researched and on", "questions may be well researched and on topic, other formats are more appropriate", "flavor to mine was reopened on Academia Stack Exchange after a [meta conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping)", "shopping is [described](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) on meta does not seem to match my question. The", "[such as my question on #of attendees at academic conferences] and (2) asking", "[my question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/88915/which-academic-conferences-have-more-4-000-attendees) was closed for shopping. However, how shopping is [described](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) on meta", "well suited for this site. This is because each answer would be an", "individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar as an answer", "such, are off-topic here > > > Note that the word \"shopping\" applied", "offensive, it implies the question asker didn't simply google the question and is", "partial answers to such questions. While such questions may be well researched and", "reason could go something like as follows > > \"List asking\" questions which", "publishers, journals, research topics or similar as an answer or seek an assessment", "not seem to match my question. The meta question I link to outlines", "equally valid yet incomplete part of the complete list. Questions of this form", "question and is asking for an opinion, which is simply not correct. There", "on topic, other formats are more appropriate for this type of question.** >", "close reasons list asking and shopping. The description of the list asking close", "this type of question. > > > I think shopping has too negative", "list, the close reason should be more explicit and include a \"for any", "to such questions. While such questions may be well researched and on topic,", "form are unlikely to receive a complete list/answer by a single user. Therefore", "shopping questions (1) asking for a list of objective facts related to academia", "of type (1) are shopping. For example, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915), which is nearly identical", "a different community member, are not well suited for this site. This is", "comparison. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities,", "[meta conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping) which classified it as not shopping. If we are to say", "for this type of question. > > > I think shopping has too", "by a single user. Therefore it is difficult to upvote and downvote the", "that the word \"shopping\" applied to (1) is a bit offensive, it implies", "journals, research topics or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or", "like there are two very different types/interpretations of shopping questions (1) asking for", "on meta does not seem to match my question. The meta question I", "question asker didn't simply google the question and is asking for an opinion,", "lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar as", "to mine was reopened on Academia Stack Exchange after a [meta conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping) which", "seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics", "close reason could go something like as follows > > \"List asking\" questions", "entries of the list each likely contributed by a different community member, are", "whether questions of type (1) are shopping. For example, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-us-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915), which is", "as my question on #of attendees at academic conferences] and (2) asking for", "on Academia Stack Exchange after a [meta conversation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1808/why-was-this-question-closed-for-shopping) which classified it as not", "an answer or seek an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here", "go something like as follows > > \"List asking\" questions which seek a", "of question. > > > I think shopping has too negative of a", "the list asking close reason could go something like as follows > >", "two close reasons list asking and shopping. The description of the list asking", "the word \"shopping\" applied to (1) is a bit offensive, it implies the", "list/answer by a single user. Therefore it is difficult to upvote and downvote", "a single user. Therefore it is difficult to upvote and downvote the partial", "facts, with entries of the list each likely contributed by a different community", "asks for an answer in list form, regardless as to the reason one", "to close questions of people who have demonstrated considerable research behind their question.", "There seems to be a lot of disagreement as to whether questions of" ]
[ "loads, likely career path - that are not always in line with other", "- that are not always in line with other STEM subjects, let alone", "concern is that there are some features of a mathematician's research life -", "were some initial answers by mathematicians which seemed useful/relevant in the specific context,", "so be it.) The question has been edited significantly now, so that it", "at least to STEM? There were some initial answers by mathematicians which seemed", "research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/) was originally asked on mathoverflow in the context of the working life", "there are some features of a mathematician's research life - priorities, opportunities, teaching", "career path - that are not always in line with other STEM subjects,", "that are not always in line with other STEM subjects, let alone what", "question has been edited significantly now, so that it is a generic question.", "features of a mathematician's research life - priorities, opportunities, teaching loads, likely career", "STEM? There were some initial answers by mathematicians which seemed useful/relevant in the", "now, so that it is a generic question. I wondered what the community's", "in the specific context, but are probably less applicable to academia as a", "specific to math(s), or at least to STEM? There were some initial answers", "I wondered what the community's feelings are, on whether this was the right", "life of a professional mathematician, and was then migrated to academia.SE. (I am", "asked on mathoverflow in the context of the working life of a professional", "question [How do academics with teaching responsibilities, etc. find the time to do", "which is specific to math(s), or at least to STEM? There were some", "was the right decision, but so be it.) The question has been edited", "academics with teaching responsibilities, etc. find the time to do research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/) was originally", "or not. My concern is that there are some features of a mathematician's", "mathoverflow in the context of the working life of a professional mathematician, and", "feelings are, on whether this was the right move or not. My concern", "find the time to do research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/) was originally asked on mathoverflow in the", "mathematicians which seemed useful/relevant in the specific context, but are probably less applicable", "which seemed useful/relevant in the specific context, but are probably less applicable to", "what happens in the humanities. Is there a case for having a question", "time to do research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/) was originally asked on mathoverflow in the context of", "life - priorities, opportunities, teaching loads, likely career path - that are not", "of the working life of a professional mathematician, and was then migrated to", "path - that are not always in line with other STEM subjects, let", "the context of the working life of a professional mathematician, and was then", "opportunities, teaching loads, likely career path - that are not always in line", "working life of a professional mathematician, and was then migrated to academia.SE. (I", "line with other STEM subjects, let alone what happens in the humanities. Is", "The question has been edited significantly now, so that it is a generic", "significantly now, so that it is a generic question. I wondered what the", "generic question. I wondered what the community's feelings are, on whether this was", "not always in line with other STEM subjects, let alone what happens in", "teaching responsibilities, etc. find the time to do research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/) was originally asked on", "a mathematician's research life - priorities, opportunities, teaching loads, likely career path -", "not wholly convinced that this was the right decision, but so be it.)", "it is a generic question. I wondered what the community's feelings are, on", "whether this was the right move or not. My concern is that there", "the right move or not. My concern is that there are some features", "My concern is that there are some features of a mathematician's research life", "has been edited significantly now, so that it is a generic question. I", "(I am not wholly convinced that this was the right decision, but so", "on whether this was the right move or not. My concern is that", "in the context of the working life of a professional mathematician, and was", "STEM subjects, let alone what happens in the humanities. Is there a case", "is a generic question. I wondered what the community's feelings are, on whether", "question like this which is specific to math(s), or at least to STEM?", "research life - priorities, opportunities, teaching loads, likely career path - that are", "priorities, opportunities, teaching loads, likely career path - that are not always in", "this was the right decision, but so be it.) The question has been", "then migrated to academia.SE. (I am not wholly convinced that this was the", "for having a question like this which is specific to math(s), or at", "initial answers by mathematicians which seemed useful/relevant in the specific context, but are", "answers by mathematicians which seemed useful/relevant in the specific context, but are probably", "and was then migrated to academia.SE. (I am not wholly convinced that this", "was then migrated to academia.SE. (I am not wholly convinced that this was", "it.) The question has been edited significantly now, so that it is a", "- priorities, opportunities, teaching loads, likely career path - that are not always", "wholly convinced that this was the right decision, but so be it.) The", "least to STEM? There were some initial answers by mathematicians which seemed useful/relevant", "a professional mathematician, and was then migrated to academia.SE. (I am not wholly", "context of the working life of a professional mathematician, and was then migrated", "migrated to academia.SE. (I am not wholly convinced that this was the right", "of a mathematician's research life - priorities, opportunities, teaching loads, likely career path", "alone what happens in the humanities. Is there a case for having a", "question. I wondered what the community's feelings are, on whether this was the", "right move or not. My concern is that there are some features of", "[How do academics with teaching responsibilities, etc. find the time to do research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/)", "to do research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/) was originally asked on mathoverflow in the context of the", "not. My concern is that there are some features of a mathematician's research", "of a professional mathematician, and was then migrated to academia.SE. (I am not", "a question like this which is specific to math(s), or at least to", "was originally asked on mathoverflow in the context of the working life of", "convinced that this was the right decision, but so be it.) The question", "in the humanities. Is there a case for having a question like this", "Is there a case for having a question like this which is specific", "to academia.SE. (I am not wholly convinced that this was the right decision,", "a generic question. I wondered what the community's feelings are, on whether this", "do research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/) was originally asked on mathoverflow in the context of the working", "mathematician, and was then migrated to academia.SE. (I am not wholly convinced that", "to STEM? There were some initial answers by mathematicians which seemed useful/relevant in", "with other STEM subjects, let alone what happens in the humanities. Is there", "math(s), or at least to STEM? There were some initial answers by mathematicians", "are some features of a mathematician's research life - priorities, opportunities, teaching loads,", "been edited significantly now, so that it is a generic question. I wondered", "subjects, let alone what happens in the humanities. Is there a case for", "likely career path - that are not always in line with other STEM", "having a question like this which is specific to math(s), or at least", "to math(s), or at least to STEM? There were some initial answers by", "edited significantly now, so that it is a generic question. I wondered what", "that it is a generic question. I wondered what the community's feelings are,", "a case for having a question like this which is specific to math(s),", "happens in the humanities. Is there a case for having a question like", "There were some initial answers by mathematicians which seemed useful/relevant in the specific", "decision, but so be it.) The question has been edited significantly now, so", "let alone what happens in the humanities. Is there a case for having", "this which is specific to math(s), or at least to STEM? There were", "by mathematicians which seemed useful/relevant in the specific context, but are probably less", "on mathoverflow in the context of the working life of a professional mathematician,", "community's feelings are, on whether this was the right move or not. My", "humanities. Is there a case for having a question like this which is", "or at least to STEM? There were some initial answers by mathematicians which", "the humanities. Is there a case for having a question like this which", "right decision, but so be it.) The question has been edited significantly now,", "are, on whether this was the right move or not. My concern is", "the working life of a professional mathematician, and was then migrated to academia.SE.", "there a case for having a question like this which is specific to", "was the right move or not. My concern is that there are some", "with teaching responsibilities, etc. find the time to do research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/) was originally asked", "useful/relevant in the specific context, but are probably less applicable to academia as", "wondered what the community's feelings are, on whether this was the right move", "like this which is specific to math(s), or at least to STEM? There", "that there are some features of a mathematician's research life - priorities, opportunities,", "what the community's feelings are, on whether this was the right move or", "seemed useful/relevant in the specific context, but are probably less applicable to academia", "am not wholly convinced that this was the right decision, but so be", "professional mathematician, and was then migrated to academia.SE. (I am not wholly convinced", "responsibilities, etc. find the time to do research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/) was originally asked on mathoverflow", "teaching loads, likely career path - that are not always in line with", "etc. find the time to do research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/) was originally asked on mathoverflow in", "academia.SE. (I am not wholly convinced that this was the right decision, but", "that this was the right decision, but so be it.) The question has", "some features of a mathematician's research life - priorities, opportunities, teaching loads, likely", "the community's feelings are, on whether this was the right move or not.", "move or not. My concern is that there are some features of a", "case for having a question like this which is specific to math(s), or", "some initial answers by mathematicians which seemed useful/relevant in the specific context, but", "in line with other STEM subjects, let alone what happens in the humanities.", "other STEM subjects, let alone what happens in the humanities. Is there a", "The question [How do academics with teaching responsibilities, etc. find the time to", "do academics with teaching responsibilities, etc. find the time to do research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/) was", "originally asked on mathoverflow in the context of the working life of a", "always in line with other STEM subjects, let alone what happens in the", "is that there are some features of a mathematician's research life - priorities,", "this was the right move or not. My concern is that there are", "mathematician's research life - priorities, opportunities, teaching loads, likely career path - that", "so that it is a generic question. I wondered what the community's feelings", "the time to do research?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/89362/) was originally asked on mathoverflow in the context", "be it.) The question has been edited significantly now, so that it is", "are not always in line with other STEM subjects, let alone what happens", "the right decision, but so be it.) The question has been edited significantly", "the specific context, but are probably less applicable to academia as a whole.", "is specific to math(s), or at least to STEM? There were some initial", "but so be it.) The question has been edited significantly now, so that" ]
[ "to learn how to pose better questions when this level of negative voting", "were an established participant who was asking something outrageous like, How can I", "pretty good rep, that got a lot of downvotes. That can happen, and", "votes (including the one I just cast). It was written 13 hours ago", "[question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/90483/32436) written by a newcomer with a small starting rep. It currently has", "focus our efforts on closing the question swiftly and painlessly? Edit: I will", "cast). It was written 13 hours ago and has not yet been closed.", "when it gets to -3, and instead focus our efforts on closing the", "written by a newcomer with a small starting rep. It currently has a", "It was written 13 hours ago and has not yet been closed. Jeesh!", "How can I take revenge on my competitor and steal his best grad", "was asking something outrageous like, How can I take revenge on my competitor", "currently has a total negative score of -7, and four close votes (including", "has not yet been closed. Jeesh! Granted, the question has problems! But it's", "my point is that Nikki's question is not in that realm. Friends, can't", "be reasonable and stop downvoting such a question when it gets to -3,", "revenge on my competitor and steal his best grad student -- or something", "we be reasonable and stop downvoting such a question when it gets to", "occurs. It would be different if it were an established participant who was", "point is that Nikki's question is not in that realm. Friends, can't we", "a newcomer with a small starting rep. It currently has a total negative", "small starting rep. It currently has a total negative score of -7, and", "outrageous question posed by someone with a pretty good rep, that got a", "outrageous like, How can I take revenge on my competitor and steal his", "questions when this level of negative voting occurs. It would be different if", "not yet been closed. Jeesh! Granted, the question has problems! But it's hard", "in that realm. Friends, can't we be reasonable and stop downvoting such a", "gets to -3, and instead focus our efforts on closing the question swiftly", "stop downvoting such a question when it gets to -3, and instead focus", "one I just cast). It was written 13 hours ago and has not", "like that. I did once see an outrageous question posed by someone with", "by someone with a pretty good rep, that got a lot of downvotes.", "with a small starting rep. It currently has a total negative score of", "see an outrageous question posed by someone with a pretty good rep, that", "happen, and my point is that Nikki's question is not in that realm.", "and stop downvoting such a question when it gets to -3, and instead", "a total negative score of -7, and four close votes (including the one", "question when it gets to -3, and instead focus our efforts on closing", "Friends, can't we be reasonable and stop downvoting such a question when it", "a question when it gets to -3, and instead focus our efforts on", "has a total negative score of -7, and four close votes (including the", "four close votes (including the one I just cast). It was written 13", "is that Nikki's question is not in that realm. Friends, can't we be", "something like that. I did once see an outrageous question posed by someone", "That can happen, and my point is that Nikki's question is not in", "hard for people to learn how to pose better questions when this level", "best grad student -- or something like that. I did once see an", "is not in that realm. Friends, can't we be reasonable and stop downvoting", "Nikki's question is not in that realm. Friends, can't we be reasonable and", "a lot of downvotes. That can happen, and my point is that Nikki's", "painlessly? Edit: I will change my suggested floor to -4 based on the", "something outrageous like, How can I take revenge on my competitor and steal", "by a newcomer with a small starting rep. It currently has a total", "downvotes. That can happen, and my point is that Nikki's question is not", "(including the one I just cast). It was written 13 hours ago and", "grad student -- or something like that. I did once see an outrageous", "this level of negative voting occurs. It would be different if it were", "realm. Friends, can't we be reasonable and stop downvoting such a question when", "been closed. Jeesh! Granted, the question has problems! But it's hard for people", "of -7, and four close votes (including the one I just cast). It", "can I take revenge on my competitor and steal his best grad student", "lot of downvotes. That can happen, and my point is that Nikki's question", "level of negative voting occurs. It would be different if it were an", "instead focus our efforts on closing the question swiftly and painlessly? Edit: I", "established participant who was asking something outrageous like, How can I take revenge", "an established participant who was asking something outrageous like, How can I take", "I will change my suggested floor to -4 based on the answer by", "and has not yet been closed. Jeesh! Granted, the question has problems! But", "question is not in that realm. Friends, can't we be reasonable and stop", "that realm. Friends, can't we be reasonable and stop downvoting such a question", "learn how to pose better questions when this level of negative voting occurs.", "It would be different if it were an established participant who was asking", "someone with a pretty good rep, that got a lot of downvotes. That", "with a pretty good rep, that got a lot of downvotes. That can", "a pretty good rep, that got a lot of downvotes. That can happen,", "pose better questions when this level of negative voting occurs. It would be", "But it's hard for people to learn how to pose better questions when", "that Nikki's question is not in that realm. Friends, can't we be reasonable", "yet been closed. Jeesh! Granted, the question has problems! But it's hard for", "I take revenge on my competitor and steal his best grad student --", "people to learn how to pose better questions when this level of negative", "question swiftly and painlessly? Edit: I will change my suggested floor to -4", "our efforts on closing the question swiftly and painlessly? Edit: I will change", "student -- or something like that. I did once see an outrageous question", "and four close votes (including the one I just cast). It was written", "good rep, that got a lot of downvotes. That can happen, and my", "ago and has not yet been closed. Jeesh! Granted, the question has problems!", "newcomer with a small starting rep. It currently has a total negative score", "can happen, and my point is that Nikki's question is not in that", "would be different if it were an established participant who was asking something", "if it were an established participant who was asking something outrageous like, How", "voting occurs. It would be different if it were an established participant who", "efforts on closing the question swiftly and painlessly? Edit: I will change my", "rep, that got a lot of downvotes. That can happen, and my point", "swiftly and painlessly? Edit: I will change my suggested floor to -4 based", "it were an established participant who was asking something outrageous like, How can", "for people to learn how to pose better questions when this level of", "I just cast). It was written 13 hours ago and has not yet", "was written 13 hours ago and has not yet been closed. Jeesh! Granted,", "that got a lot of downvotes. That can happen, and my point is", "of downvotes. That can happen, and my point is that Nikki's question is", "like, How can I take revenge on my competitor and steal his best", "question has problems! But it's hard for people to learn how to pose", "written 13 hours ago and has not yet been closed. Jeesh! Granted, the", "negative score of -7, and four close votes (including the one I just", "did once see an outrageous question posed by someone with a pretty good", "posed by someone with a pretty good rep, that got a lot of", "Edit: I will change my suggested floor to -4 based on the answer", "different if it were an established participant who was asking something outrageous like,", "of negative voting occurs. It would be different if it were an established", "such a question when it gets to -3, and instead focus our efforts", "Granted, the question has problems! But it's hard for people to learn how", "when this level of negative voting occurs. It would be different if it", "rep. It currently has a total negative score of -7, and four close", "competitor and steal his best grad student -- or something like that. I", "the question has problems! But it's hard for people to learn how to", "reasonable and stop downvoting such a question when it gets to -3, and", "-3, and instead focus our efforts on closing the question swiftly and painlessly?", "who was asking something outrageous like, How can I take revenge on my", "just cast). It was written 13 hours ago and has not yet been", "that. I did once see an outrageous question posed by someone with a", "Here's a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/90483/32436) written by a newcomer with a small starting rep. It", "negative voting occurs. It would be different if it were an established participant", "asking something outrageous like, How can I take revenge on my competitor and", "total negative score of -7, and four close votes (including the one I", "a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/90483/32436) written by a newcomer with a small starting rep. It currently", "hours ago and has not yet been closed. Jeesh! Granted, the question has", "my competitor and steal his best grad student -- or something like that.", "a small starting rep. It currently has a total negative score of -7,", "better questions when this level of negative voting occurs. It would be different", "to -3, and instead focus our efforts on closing the question swiftly and", "13 hours ago and has not yet been closed. Jeesh! Granted, the question", "how to pose better questions when this level of negative voting occurs. It", "-- or something like that. I did once see an outrageous question posed", "on closing the question swiftly and painlessly? Edit: I will change my suggested", "on my competitor and steal his best grad student -- or something like", "and painlessly? Edit: I will change my suggested floor to -4 based on", "It currently has a total negative score of -7, and four close votes", "problems! But it's hard for people to learn how to pose better questions", "closed. Jeesh! Granted, the question has problems! But it's hard for people to", "can't we be reasonable and stop downvoting such a question when it gets", "will change my suggested floor to -4 based on the answer by @strongbad.", "I did once see an outrageous question posed by someone with a pretty", "be different if it were an established participant who was asking something outrageous", "his best grad student -- or something like that. I did once see", "and instead focus our efforts on closing the question swiftly and painlessly? Edit:", "once see an outrageous question posed by someone with a pretty good rep,", "and my point is that Nikki's question is not in that realm. Friends,", "the one I just cast). It was written 13 hours ago and has", "to pose better questions when this level of negative voting occurs. It would", "it's hard for people to learn how to pose better questions when this", "take revenge on my competitor and steal his best grad student -- or", "downvoting such a question when it gets to -3, and instead focus our", "has problems! But it's hard for people to learn how to pose better", "closing the question swiftly and painlessly? Edit: I will change my suggested floor", "question posed by someone with a pretty good rep, that got a lot", "and steal his best grad student -- or something like that. I did", "not in that realm. Friends, can't we be reasonable and stop downvoting such", "it gets to -3, and instead focus our efforts on closing the question", "participant who was asking something outrageous like, How can I take revenge on", "-7, and four close votes (including the one I just cast). It was", "the question swiftly and painlessly? Edit: I will change my suggested floor to", "an outrageous question posed by someone with a pretty good rep, that got", "score of -7, and four close votes (including the one I just cast).", "or something like that. I did once see an outrageous question posed by", "starting rep. It currently has a total negative score of -7, and four", "close votes (including the one I just cast). It was written 13 hours", "steal his best grad student -- or something like that. I did once", "Jeesh! Granted, the question has problems! But it's hard for people to learn", "got a lot of downvotes. That can happen, and my point is that" ]
[ "answers. Should it specifically answer the actual question asked, or is it allowed", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/90807/74774> This is edited by the mod Eykanal, removing over half of the", "answer. Especially because even after removing the sarcasm part it doesn't really give", "the sarcasm didn't add anything and last portion of that post looks like", "answer. But different house, different rules... This made me wonder how strict one", "of that post looks like an answer. But I'll be honest. If this", "not an answer. Especially because even after removing the sarcasm part it doesn't", "seeing following answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/90807/74774> This is edited by the mod Eykanal, removing over", "(I admit, quite funny) post. I do understand the reasoning, as the sarcasm", "as the sarcasm didn't add anything and last portion of that post looks", "an answer. Especially because even after removing the sarcasm part it doesn't really", "to delete the answer for being not an answer. Especially because even after", "really give an answer on the question OP asked. Which was how to", "being not an answer. Especially because even after removing the sarcasm part it", "question asked, or is it allowed to leave a more general comment on", "the question OP asked. Which was how to solve the issue (emphasis mine).", "voted to delete the answer for being not an answer. Especially because even", "give an answer on the question OP asked. Which was how to solve", "to solve the issue (emphasis mine). On SO this should be a comment,", "how to solve the issue (emphasis mine). On SO this should be a", "on the question OP asked. Which was how to solve the issue (emphasis", "should be when evaluating answers. Should it specifically answer the actual question asked,", "Eykanal, removing over half of the (I admit, quite funny) post. I do", "sarcasm didn't add anything and last portion of that post looks like an", "Especially because even after removing the sarcasm part it doesn't really give an", "answer. But I'll be honest. If this was on stackoverflow, I'd have voted", "an answer. But different house, different rules... This made me wonder how strict", "an answer on the question OP asked. Which was how to solve the", "is edited by the mod Eykanal, removing over half of the (I admit,", "add anything and last portion of that post looks like an answer. But", "this should be a comment, not an answer. But different house, different rules...", "made me wonder how strict one should be when evaluating answers. Should it", "comment, not an answer. But different house, different rules... This made me wonder", "solve the issue (emphasis mine). On SO this should be a comment, not", "issue (emphasis mine). On SO this should be a comment, not an answer.", "of the (I admit, quite funny) post. I do understand the reasoning, as", "answer on the question OP asked. Which was how to solve the issue", "that post looks like an answer. But I'll be honest. If this was", "the (I admit, quite funny) post. I do understand the reasoning, as the", "mod Eykanal, removing over half of the (I admit, quite funny) post. I", "sarcasm part it doesn't really give an answer on the question OP asked.", "even after removing the sarcasm part it doesn't really give an answer on", "the answer for being not an answer. Especially because even after removing the", "not an answer. But different house, different rules... This made me wonder how", "it allowed to leave a more general comment on the nature of the", "understand the reasoning, as the sarcasm didn't add anything and last portion of", "post looks like an answer. But I'll be honest. If this was on", "I'll be honest. If this was on stackoverflow, I'd have voted to delete", "me wonder how strict one should be when evaluating answers. Should it specifically", "house, different rules... This made me wonder how strict one should be when", "reasoning, as the sarcasm didn't add anything and last portion of that post", "anything and last portion of that post looks like an answer. But I'll", "stackoverflow, I'd have voted to delete the answer for being not an answer.", "delete the answer for being not an answer. Especially because even after removing", "like an answer. But I'll be honest. If this was on stackoverflow, I'd", "it specifically answer the actual question asked, or is it allowed to leave", "after removing the sarcasm part it doesn't really give an answer on the", "different house, different rules... This made me wonder how strict one should be", "post. I do understand the reasoning, as the sarcasm didn't add anything and", "me when seeing following answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/90807/74774> This is edited by the mod Eykanal,", "quite funny) post. I do understand the reasoning, as the sarcasm didn't add", "evaluating answers. Should it specifically answer the actual question asked, or is it", "last portion of that post looks like an answer. But I'll be honest.", "doesn't really give an answer on the question OP asked. Which was how", "question OP asked. Which was how to solve the issue (emphasis mine). On", "allowed to leave a more general comment on the nature of the problem?", "following answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/90807/74774> This is edited by the mod Eykanal, removing over half", "should be a comment, not an answer. But different house, different rules... This", "one should be when evaluating answers. Should it specifically answer the actual question", "removing over half of the (I admit, quite funny) post. I do understand", "rules... This made me wonder how strict one should be when evaluating answers.", "answer for being not an answer. Especially because even after removing the sarcasm", "an answer. But I'll be honest. If this was on stackoverflow, I'd have", "the actual question asked, or is it allowed to leave a more general", "be a comment, not an answer. But different house, different rules... This made", "and last portion of that post looks like an answer. But I'll be", "Should it specifically answer the actual question asked, or is it allowed to", "portion of that post looks like an answer. But I'll be honest. If", "it doesn't really give an answer on the question OP asked. Which was", "the mod Eykanal, removing over half of the (I admit, quite funny) post.", "when evaluating answers. Should it specifically answer the actual question asked, or is", "on stackoverflow, I'd have voted to delete the answer for being not an", "honest. If this was on stackoverflow, I'd have voted to delete the answer", "If this was on stackoverflow, I'd have voted to delete the answer for", "this was on stackoverflow, I'd have voted to delete the answer for being", "(emphasis mine). On SO this should be a comment, not an answer. But", "admit, quite funny) post. I do understand the reasoning, as the sarcasm didn't", "came up to me when seeing following answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/90807/74774> This is edited by", "is it allowed to leave a more general comment on the nature of", "But different house, different rules... This made me wonder how strict one should", "edited by the mod Eykanal, removing over half of the (I admit, quite", "was on stackoverflow, I'd have voted to delete the answer for being not", "be honest. If this was on stackoverflow, I'd have voted to delete the", "mine). On SO this should be a comment, not an answer. But different", "half of the (I admit, quite funny) post. I do understand the reasoning,", "wonder how strict one should be when evaluating answers. Should it specifically answer", "the reasoning, as the sarcasm didn't add anything and last portion of that", "be when evaluating answers. Should it specifically answer the actual question asked, or", "or is it allowed to leave a more general comment on the nature", "the question came up to me when seeing following answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/90807/74774> This is", "when seeing following answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/90807/74774> This is edited by the mod Eykanal, removing", "for being not an answer. Especially because even after removing the sarcasm part", "didn't add anything and last portion of that post looks like an answer.", "Which was how to solve the issue (emphasis mine). On SO this should", "This is edited by the mod Eykanal, removing over half of the (I", "because even after removing the sarcasm part it doesn't really give an answer", "But I'll be honest. If this was on stackoverflow, I'd have voted to", "how strict one should be when evaluating answers. Should it specifically answer the", "strict one should be when evaluating answers. Should it specifically answer the actual", "part it doesn't really give an answer on the question OP asked. Which", "different rules... This made me wonder how strict one should be when evaluating", "answer the actual question asked, or is it allowed to leave a more", "the issue (emphasis mine). On SO this should be a comment, not an", "I'd have voted to delete the answer for being not an answer. Especially", "by the mod Eykanal, removing over half of the (I admit, quite funny)", "asked. Which was how to solve the issue (emphasis mine). On SO this", "On SO this should be a comment, not an answer. But different house,", "actual question asked, or is it allowed to leave a more general comment", "specifically answer the actual question asked, or is it allowed to leave a", "I do understand the reasoning, as the sarcasm didn't add anything and last", "have voted to delete the answer for being not an answer. Especially because", "funny) post. I do understand the reasoning, as the sarcasm didn't add anything", "removing the sarcasm part it doesn't really give an answer on the question", "OP asked. Which was how to solve the issue (emphasis mine). On SO", "question came up to me when seeing following answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/90807/74774> This is edited", "looks like an answer. But I'll be honest. If this was on stackoverflow,", "SO this should be a comment, not an answer. But different house, different", "This made me wonder how strict one should be when evaluating answers. Should", "was how to solve the issue (emphasis mine). On SO this should be", "asked, or is it allowed to leave a more general comment on the", "to me when seeing following answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/90807/74774> This is edited by the mod", "a comment, not an answer. But different house, different rules... This made me", "do understand the reasoning, as the sarcasm didn't add anything and last portion", "answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/90807/74774> This is edited by the mod Eykanal, removing over half of", "the sarcasm part it doesn't really give an answer on the question OP", "over half of the (I admit, quite funny) post. I do understand the", "up to me when seeing following answer: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/90807/74774> This is edited by the" ]
[ "came to the Academia Stack Exchange to seek some help. One of the", "I'm included in. I'll be keeping an eye out for your papers (as", "withdraw an under review manuscript from a journal when you decide you want", "> > > Is this type of thing... allowed? If so, why? I", "impact factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa), the asker is told pretty clearly—in multiple ways—that it's totally unacceptable", "to withdraw your paper for this reason. Indeed, some might think the answer", "> > Editors are reading these sites too. Like me and the editor", "the answer apparent, but the OP obviously didn't, and came to the Academia", "responses' fist paragraph was the following: > > Editors are reading these sites", "come in. > > > Is this type of thing... allowed? If so,", "they come in. > > > Is this type of thing... allowed? If", "out for your papers (as will they) and save you the trouble of", "factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa), the asker is told pretty clearly—in multiple ways—that it's totally unacceptable to", "the asker is told pretty clearly—in multiple ways—that it's totally unacceptable to withdraw", "a pretty crappy precedent. (There are also some good points mentioned in the", "of the responses' fist paragraph was the following: > > Editors are reading", "the trouble of wasting me and my reviewers' time by desk rejecting your", "points mentioned in the comments to that response that I won't replicate here;", "you the trouble of wasting me and my reviewers' time by desk rejecting", "the comments to that response that I won't replicate here; I flagged the", "might think the answer apparent, but the OP obviously didn't, and came to", "told pretty clearly—in multiple ways—that it's totally unacceptable to withdraw your paper for", "your papers as they come in. > > > Is this type of", "a large editor list serve I'm included in. I'll be keeping an eye", "(as will they) and save you the trouble of wasting me and my", "some good points mentioned in the comments to that response that I won't", "and the editor who posted this link on a large editor list serve", "this link on a large editor list serve I'm included in. I'll be", "Exchange to seek some help. One of the responses' fist paragraph was the", "One of the responses' fist paragraph was the following: > > Editors are", "the responses' fist paragraph was the following: > > Editors are reading these", "higher impact factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa), the asker is told pretty clearly—in multiple ways—that it's totally", "will [reluctantly!] unflag it if the consensus is that this is allowed, and", "me and the editor who posted this link on a large editor list", "good points mentioned in the comments to that response that I won't replicate", "apparent, but the OP obviously didn't, and came to the Academia Stack Exchange", "so, why? I think this sets a pretty crappy precedent. (There are also", "> Is this type of thing... allowed? If so, why? I think this", "pretty crappy precedent. (There are also some good points mentioned in the comments", "to the Academia Stack Exchange to seek some help. One of the responses'", "sites too. Like me and the editor who posted this link on a", "replicate here; I flagged the post, but will [reluctantly!] unflag it if the", "by desk rejecting your papers as they come in. > > > Is", "help. One of the responses' fist paragraph was the following: > > Editors", "reading these sites too. Like me and the editor who posted this link", "fist paragraph was the following: > > Editors are reading these sites too.", "> > Is this type of thing... allowed? If so, why? I think", "to withdraw an under review manuscript from a journal when you decide you", "the post, but will [reluctantly!] unflag it if the consensus is that this", "I flagged the post, but will [reluctantly!] unflag it if the consensus is", "crappy precedent. (There are also some good points mentioned in the comments to", "and came to the Academia Stack Exchange to seek some help. One of", "under review manuscript from a journal when you decide you want to submit", "think the answer apparent, but the OP obviously didn't, and came to the", "who posted this link on a large editor list serve I'm included in.", "be keeping an eye out for your papers (as will they) and save", "in. I'll be keeping an eye out for your papers (as will they)", "precedent. (There are also some good points mentioned in the comments to that", "these sites too. Like me and the editor who posted this link on", "is told pretty clearly—in multiple ways—that it's totally unacceptable to withdraw your paper", "eye out for your papers (as will they) and save you the trouble", "submit to another journal with a higher impact factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa), the asker is told", "ways—that it's totally unacceptable to withdraw your paper for this reason. Indeed, some", "in the comments to that response that I won't replicate here; I flagged", "the OP obviously didn't, and came to the Academia Stack Exchange to seek", "reviewers' time by desk rejecting your papers as they come in. > >", "my reviewers' time by desk rejecting your papers as they come in. >", "save you the trouble of wasting me and my reviewers' time by desk", "manuscript from a journal when you decide you want to submit to another", "journal when you decide you want to submit to another journal with a", "why? I think this sets a pretty crappy precedent. (There are also some", "a higher impact factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa), the asker is told pretty clearly—in multiple ways—that it's", "that I won't replicate here; I flagged the post, but will [reluctantly!] unflag", "from a journal when you decide you want to submit to another journal", "totally unacceptable to withdraw your paper for this reason. Indeed, some might think", "the following: > > Editors are reading these sites too. Like me and", "answer apparent, but the OP obviously didn't, and came to the Academia Stack", "this type of thing... allowed? If so, why? I think this sets a", "here; I flagged the post, but will [reluctantly!] unflag it if the consensus", "clearly—in multiple ways—that it's totally unacceptable to withdraw your paper for this reason.", "> Editors are reading these sites too. Like me and the editor who", "was the following: > > Editors are reading these sites too. Like me", "in. > > > Is this type of thing... allowed? If so, why?", "this sets a pretty crappy precedent. (There are also some good points mentioned", "an eye out for your papers (as will they) and save you the", "serve I'm included in. I'll be keeping an eye out for your papers", "this question, [How to withdraw an under review manuscript from a journal when", "with a higher impact factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa), the asker is told pretty clearly—in multiple ways—that", "posted this link on a large editor list serve I'm included in. I'll", "and save you the trouble of wasting me and my reviewers' time by", "too. Like me and the editor who posted this link on a large", "rejecting your papers as they come in. > > > Is this type", "pretty clearly—in multiple ways—that it's totally unacceptable to withdraw your paper for this", "papers as they come in. > > > Is this type of thing...", "In this question, [How to withdraw an under review manuscript from a journal", "reason. Indeed, some might think the answer apparent, but the OP obviously didn't,", "Stack Exchange to seek some help. One of the responses' fist paragraph was", "the editor who posted this link on a large editor list serve I'm", "of wasting me and my reviewers' time by desk rejecting your papers as", "wasting me and my reviewers' time by desk rejecting your papers as they", "desk rejecting your papers as they come in. > > > Is this", "to that response that I won't replicate here; I flagged the post, but", "for your papers (as will they) and save you the trouble of wasting", "and my reviewers' time by desk rejecting your papers as they come in.", "unacceptable to withdraw your paper for this reason. Indeed, some might think the", "won't replicate here; I flagged the post, but will [reluctantly!] unflag it if", "editor who posted this link on a large editor list serve I'm included", "me and my reviewers' time by desk rejecting your papers as they come", "but the OP obviously didn't, and came to the Academia Stack Exchange to", "paragraph was the following: > > Editors are reading these sites too. Like", "If so, why? I think this sets a pretty crappy precedent. (There are", "on a large editor list serve I'm included in. I'll be keeping an", "the Academia Stack Exchange to seek some help. One of the responses' fist", "mentioned in the comments to that response that I won't replicate here; I", "multiple ways—that it's totally unacceptable to withdraw your paper for this reason. Indeed,", "but will [reluctantly!] unflag it if the consensus is that this is allowed,", "to another journal with a higher impact factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa), the asker is told pretty", "I'll be keeping an eye out for your papers (as will they) and", "when you decide you want to submit to another journal with a higher", "[reluctantly!] unflag it if the consensus is that this is allowed, and ok.)", "Like me and the editor who posted this link on a large editor", "trouble of wasting me and my reviewers' time by desk rejecting your papers", "I won't replicate here; I flagged the post, but will [reluctantly!] unflag it", "will they) and save you the trouble of wasting me and my reviewers'", "keeping an eye out for your papers (as will they) and save you", "a journal when you decide you want to submit to another journal with", "following: > > Editors are reading these sites too. Like me and the", "withdraw your paper for this reason. Indeed, some might think the answer apparent,", "for this reason. Indeed, some might think the answer apparent, but the OP", "papers (as will they) and save you the trouble of wasting me and", "your paper for this reason. Indeed, some might think the answer apparent, but", "question, [How to withdraw an under review manuscript from a journal when you", "Is this type of thing... allowed? If so, why? I think this sets", "some help. One of the responses' fist paragraph was the following: > >", "this reason. Indeed, some might think the answer apparent, but the OP obviously", "Editors are reading these sites too. Like me and the editor who posted", "to submit to another journal with a higher impact factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa), the asker is", "also some good points mentioned in the comments to that response that I", "flagged the post, but will [reluctantly!] unflag it if the consensus is that", "some might think the answer apparent, but the OP obviously didn't, and came", "post, but will [reluctantly!] unflag it if the consensus is that this is", "review manuscript from a journal when you decide you want to submit to", "time by desk rejecting your papers as they come in. > > >", "allowed? If so, why? I think this sets a pretty crappy precedent. (There", "of thing... allowed? If so, why? I think this sets a pretty crappy", "comments to that response that I won't replicate here; I flagged the post,", "Academia Stack Exchange to seek some help. One of the responses' fist paragraph", "editor list serve I'm included in. I'll be keeping an eye out for", "(There are also some good points mentioned in the comments to that response", "your papers (as will they) and save you the trouble of wasting me", "list serve I'm included in. I'll be keeping an eye out for your", "included in. I'll be keeping an eye out for your papers (as will", "paper for this reason. Indeed, some might think the answer apparent, but the", "an under review manuscript from a journal when you decide you want to", "I think this sets a pretty crappy precedent. (There are also some good", "type of thing... allowed? If so, why? I think this sets a pretty", "another journal with a higher impact factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa), the asker is told pretty clearly—in", "response that I won't replicate here; I flagged the post, but will [reluctantly!]", "asker is told pretty clearly—in multiple ways—that it's totally unacceptable to withdraw your", "are also some good points mentioned in the comments to that response that", "to seek some help. One of the responses' fist paragraph was the following:", "thing... allowed? If so, why? I think this sets a pretty crappy precedent.", "sets a pretty crappy precedent. (There are also some good points mentioned in", "as they come in. > > > Is this type of thing... allowed?", "you want to submit to another journal with a higher impact factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa), the", "obviously didn't, and came to the Academia Stack Exchange to seek some help.", "seek some help. One of the responses' fist paragraph was the following: >", "you decide you want to submit to another journal with a higher impact", "are reading these sites too. Like me and the editor who posted this", "that response that I won't replicate here; I flagged the post, but will", "they) and save you the trouble of wasting me and my reviewers' time", "[How to withdraw an under review manuscript from a journal when you decide", "journal with a higher impact factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa), the asker is told pretty clearly—in multiple", "want to submit to another journal with a higher impact factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa), the asker", "Indeed, some might think the answer apparent, but the OP obviously didn't, and", "OP obviously didn't, and came to the Academia Stack Exchange to seek some", "link on a large editor list serve I'm included in. I'll be keeping", "decide you want to submit to another journal with a higher impact factor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90898/how-to-withdraw-an-under-review-manuscript-from-a-journal-when-you-decide-you-wa),", "large editor list serve I'm included in. I'll be keeping an eye out", "think this sets a pretty crappy precedent. (There are also some good points", "didn't, and came to the Academia Stack Exchange to seek some help. One", "it's totally unacceptable to withdraw your paper for this reason. Indeed, some might" ]
[ "member of another SE site, where they possess, say, review privileges and know", "SE sites should not be taken into consideration when granting certain privileges, such", "question, but I wonder whether experience and reputation on other SE sites should", "review privileges and know the general gist of SE very well. One way", "sites should not be taken into consideration when granting certain privileges, such as", "sake of argument, a relatively new member of Academia SE who is a", "for example. Consider, for the sake of argument, a relatively new member of", "as those to review close votes, for example. Consider, for the sake of", "would be to use a formula based on a combination of SE sites,", "and also a high-rep member of another SE site, where they possess, say,", "when granting certain privileges, such as those to review close votes, for example.", "general gist of SE very well. One way to implement this would be", "possess, say, review privileges and know the general gist of SE very well.", "a meta meta question, but I wonder whether experience and reputation on other", "consideration when granting certain privileges, such as those to review close votes, for", "but I wonder whether experience and reputation on other SE sites should not", "such as those to review close votes, for example. Consider, for the sake", "serving academic and also a high-rep member of another SE site, where they", "very well. One way to implement this would be to use a formula", "votes, for example. Consider, for the sake of argument, a relatively new member", "not be taken into consideration when granting certain privileges, such as those to", "wonder whether experience and reputation on other SE sites should not be taken", "taken into consideration when granting certain privileges, such as those to review close", "to implement this would be to use a formula based on a combination", "way to implement this would be to use a formula based on a", "review close votes, for example. Consider, for the sake of argument, a relatively", "example. Consider, for the sake of argument, a relatively new member of Academia", "a combination of SE sites, say Academia SE rep + 10% of rep", "where they possess, say, review privileges and know the general gist of SE", "certain privileges, such as those to review close votes, for example. Consider, for", "to review close votes, for example. Consider, for the sake of argument, a", "gist of SE very well. One way to implement this would be to", "site, where they possess, say, review privileges and know the general gist of", "also a high-rep member of another SE site, where they possess, say, review", "for the sake of argument, a relatively new member of Academia SE who", "and know the general gist of SE very well. One way to implement", "be taken into consideration when granting certain privileges, such as those to review", "other SE sites should not be taken into consideration when granting certain privileges,", "reputation on other SE sites should not be taken into consideration when granting", "is a long serving academic and also a high-rep member of another SE", "of Academia SE who is a long serving academic and also a high-rep", "this would be to use a formula based on a combination of SE", "privileges and know the general gist of SE very well. One way to", "experience and reputation on other SE sites should not be taken into consideration", "and reputation on other SE sites should not be taken into consideration when", "the general gist of SE very well. One way to implement this would", "meta question, but I wonder whether experience and reputation on other SE sites", "meta meta question, but I wonder whether experience and reputation on other SE", "those to review close votes, for example. Consider, for the sake of argument,", "another SE site, where they possess, say, review privileges and know the general", "know the general gist of SE very well. One way to implement this", "a high-rep member of another SE site, where they possess, say, review privileges", "on a combination of SE sites, say Academia SE rep + 10% of", "close votes, for example. Consider, for the sake of argument, a relatively new", "member of Academia SE who is a long serving academic and also a", "who is a long serving academic and also a high-rep member of another", "new member of Academia SE who is a long serving academic and also", "implement this would be to use a formula based on a combination of", "of SE very well. One way to implement this would be to use", "SE site, where they possess, say, review privileges and know the general gist", "on other SE sites should not be taken into consideration when granting certain", "they possess, say, review privileges and know the general gist of SE very", "into consideration when granting certain privileges, such as those to review close votes,", "long serving academic and also a high-rep member of another SE site, where", "use a formula based on a combination of SE sites, say Academia SE", "of SE sites, say Academia SE rep + 10% of rep elsewhere on", "relatively new member of Academia SE who is a long serving academic and", "a long serving academic and also a high-rep member of another SE site,", "a relatively new member of Academia SE who is a long serving academic", "is a meta meta question, but I wonder whether experience and reputation on", "should not be taken into consideration when granting certain privileges, such as those", "well. One way to implement this would be to use a formula based", "Academia SE who is a long serving academic and also a high-rep member", "based on a combination of SE sites, say Academia SE rep + 10%", "formula based on a combination of SE sites, say Academia SE rep +", "this is a meta meta question, but I wonder whether experience and reputation", "to use a formula based on a combination of SE sites, say Academia", "argument, a relatively new member of Academia SE who is a long serving", "of argument, a relatively new member of Academia SE who is a long", "SE who is a long serving academic and also a high-rep member of", "say, review privileges and know the general gist of SE very well. One", "of another SE site, where they possess, say, review privileges and know the", "granting certain privileges, such as those to review close votes, for example. Consider,", "the sake of argument, a relatively new member of Academia SE who is", "One way to implement this would be to use a formula based on", "academic and also a high-rep member of another SE site, where they possess,", "be to use a formula based on a combination of SE sites, say", "privileges, such as those to review close votes, for example. Consider, for the", "combination of SE sites, say Academia SE rep + 10% of rep elsewhere", "I wonder whether experience and reputation on other SE sites should not be", "a formula based on a combination of SE sites, say Academia SE rep", "SE sites, say Academia SE rep + 10% of rep elsewhere on SE.", "SE very well. One way to implement this would be to use a", "Consider, for the sake of argument, a relatively new member of Academia SE", "high-rep member of another SE site, where they possess, say, review privileges and", "whether experience and reputation on other SE sites should not be taken into", "Perhaps this is a meta meta question, but I wonder whether experience and" ]
[ "to know the usage of the custom close reasons, [usage data are unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons).", "description of the kind of questions it would apply to * Some examples", "close reasons, [usage data are unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons). The idea for each answer to have:", "[usage data are unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons). The idea for each answer to have: * Proposed", "the SE team to [create more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please) for us. While it would be desirable", "custom close reasons. If we want more we would have to ask/beg the", "A description of the kind of questions it would apply to * Some", "close reason * A description of the kind of questions it would apply", "data are unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons). The idea for each answer to have: * Proposed text", "reasons. If we want more we would have to ask/beg the SE team", "desirable to know the usage of the custom close reasons, [usage data are", "can currently only have 3 custom close reasons. If we want more we", "be desirable to know the usage of the custom close reasons, [usage data", "of questions it would apply to * Some examples to demonstrate the need", "team to [create more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please) for us. While it would be desirable to know", "currently only have 3 custom close reasons. If we want more we would", "we want more we would have to ask/beg the SE team to [create", "this [answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1499/929), I think a discussion of our custom close reasons would be", "discussion of our custom close reasons would be helpful. We can currently only", "for this close reason * Links to any discussion threads on meta relevant", "I think a discussion of our custom close reasons would be helpful. We", "* Some examples to demonstrate the need for this close reason * Links", "need for this close reason * Links to any discussion threads on meta", "close reasons would be helpful. We can currently only have 3 custom close", "know the usage of the custom close reasons, [usage data are unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons). The", "of the custom close reasons, [usage data are unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons). The idea for each", "* Links to any discussion threads on meta relevant to this close reason", "close reasons. If we want more we would have to ask/beg the SE", "3 custom close reasons. If we want more we would have to ask/beg", "While it would be desirable to know the usage of the custom close", "demonstrate the need for this close reason * Links to any discussion threads", "for each answer to have: * Proposed text of a custom close reason", "Some examples to demonstrate the need for this close reason * Links to", "* A description of the kind of questions it would apply to ", "We can currently only have 3 custom close reasons. If we want more", "would apply to Some examples to demonstrate the need for this close", "reason * A description of the kind of questions it would apply to", "usage of the custom close reasons, [usage data are unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons). The idea for", "ask/beg the SE team to [create more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please) for us. While it would be", "text of a custom close reason * A description of the kind of", "would be helpful. We can currently only have 3 custom close reasons. If", "want more we would have to ask/beg the SE team to [create more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please)", "reasons, [usage data are unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons). The idea for each answer to have: ", " Proposed text of a custom close reason * A description of the", "reason * Links to any discussion threads on meta relevant to this close", "it would be desirable to know the usage of the custom close reasons,", "close reason * Links to any discussion threads on meta relevant to this", "reasons would be helpful. We can currently only have 3 custom close reasons.", "to [create more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please) for us. While it would be desirable to know the", "more we would have to ask/beg the SE team to [create more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please) for", "apply to * Some examples to demonstrate the need for this close reason", "idea for each answer to have: * Proposed text of a custom close", "kind of questions it would apply to * Some examples to demonstrate the", "to demonstrate the need for this close reason * Links to any discussion", "the usage of the custom close reasons, [usage data are unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons). The idea", "a discussion of our custom close reasons would be helpful. We can currently", "would have to ask/beg the SE team to [create more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please) for us. While", "custom close reason * A description of the kind of questions it would", "Following on from this [answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1499/929), I think a discussion of our custom close", "unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons). The idea for each answer to have: * Proposed text of a", "the custom close reasons, [usage data are unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons). The idea for each answer", "helpful. We can currently only have 3 custom close reasons. If we want", "[answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1499/929), I think a discussion of our custom close reasons would be helpful.", "for us. While it would be desirable to know the usage of the", "questions it would apply to * Some examples to demonstrate the need for", "us. While it would be desirable to know the usage of the custom", "The idea for each answer to have: * Proposed text of a custom", "have to ask/beg the SE team to [create more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please) for us. While it", "the kind of questions it would apply to * Some examples to demonstrate", "Proposed text of a custom close reason * A description of the kind", "it would apply to * Some examples to demonstrate the need for this", "the need for this close reason * Links to any discussion threads on", "to have: * Proposed text of a custom close reason * A description", "this close reason * Links to any discussion threads on meta relevant to", "custom close reasons, [usage data are unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons). The idea for each answer to", "a custom close reason * A description of the kind of questions it", "have: * Proposed text of a custom close reason * A description of", "our custom close reasons would be helpful. We can currently only have 3", "are unavailable](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/194378/how-can-i-search-for-custom-off-topic-close-reasons). The idea for each answer to have: * Proposed text of", "[create more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please) for us. While it would be desirable to know the usage", "SE team to [create more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please) for us. While it would be desirable to", "we would have to ask/beg the SE team to [create more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please) for us.", "would be desirable to know the usage of the custom close reasons, [usage", "to ask/beg the SE team to [create more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please) for us. While it would", "be helpful. We can currently only have 3 custom close reasons. If we", "answer to have: * Proposed text of a custom close reason * A", "custom close reasons would be helpful. We can currently only have 3 custom", "think a discussion of our custom close reasons would be helpful. We can", "of the kind of questions it would apply to * Some examples to", "from this [answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1499/929), I think a discussion of our custom close reasons would", "of a custom close reason * A description of the kind of questions", "each answer to have: * Proposed text of a custom close reason ", "examples to demonstrate the need for this close reason Links to any", "If we want more we would have to ask/beg the SE team to", "only have 3 custom close reasons. If we want more we would have", "on from this [answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1499/929), I think a discussion of our custom close reasons", "more](https://meta.askubuntu.com/questions/6994/can-we-have-more-than-3-custom-close-reasons-pretty-please) for us. While it would be desirable to know the usage of", "of our custom close reasons would be helpful. We can currently only have", "to * Some examples to demonstrate the need for this close reason *", "have 3 custom close reasons. If we want more we would have to" ]
[ "points are being awarded to the user. * This is demotivating for the", "user. * Though comments get many upvotes, no points are being awarded to", "* Award a bronze or silver or gold reputation badge based on the", "following would do.) * Award at least 1 point for each upvote of", "point (nonzero) to the user with a comment with 5 upvotes. * Award", "silver or gold reputation badge based on the number of upvotes on comments.", "being awarded to the user. * This is demotivating for the new members", "or the answers. Why am I asking this question? * Few answers just", "bronze or silver or gold reputation badge based on the number of upvotes", "5 upvotes. * Award a bronze or silver or gold reputation badge based", "* Few answers just combine the ideas mentioned in the comments and those", "Award some point (nonzero) to the user with a comment with 5 upvotes.", "points associated with the comments on the questions or the answers. Why am", "no points associated with the comments on the questions or the answers. Why", "a comment. This will keep the users entertained and motivated to give their", "is demotivating for the new members of academia.SE site. What could possibly be", "comment. This will keep the users entertained and motivated to give their best", "this question? * Few answers just combine the ideas mentioned in the comments", "the upvotes of the questions and answers have some points associated. However, there", "the comments and those answers keep getting upvotes there by increasing the points", "or silver or gold reputation badge based on the number of upvotes on", "to give their best in answering the questions from corners of the world.", "are being awarded to the user. * This is demotivating for the new", "the ideas mentioned in the comments and those answers keep getting upvotes there", "with the comments on the questions or the answers. Why am I asking", "comments get many upvotes, no points are being awarded to the user. ", "(any one of the following would do.) Award at least 1 point", "academia.SE site. What could possibly be done? (any one of the following would", "comments and those answers keep getting upvotes there by increasing the points of", "This is demotivating for the new members of academia.SE site. What could possibly", "the questions from corners of the world. * Award some point (nonzero) to", "mentioned in the comments and those answers keep getting upvotes there by increasing", "best in answering the questions from corners of the world. * Award some", "new members of academia.SE site. What could possibly be done? (any one of", "do.) * Award at least 1 point for each upvote of a comment.", "members of academia.SE site. What could possibly be done? (any one of the", "Though comments get many upvotes, no points are being awarded to the user.", "to the user with a comment with 5 upvotes. * Award a bronze", "the questions or the answers. Why am I asking this question? * Few", "by increasing the points of the user. * Though comments get many upvotes,", "of a comment. This will keep the users entertained and motivated to give", "no points are being awarded to the user. * This is demotivating for", "of academia.SE site. What could possibly be done? (any one of the following", "to the user. * This is demotivating for the new members of academia.SE", "What could possibly be done? (any one of the following would do.) ", "of the questions and answers have some points associated. However, there are no", "some points associated. However, there are no points associated with the comments on", "getting upvotes there by increasing the points of the user. Though comments", "there are no points associated with the comments on the questions or the", "* Award at least 1 point for each upvote of a comment. This", "the users entertained and motivated to give their best in answering the questions", "answers have some points associated. However, there are no points associated with the", "done? (any one of the following would do.) * Award at least 1", "user. * This is demotivating for the new members of academia.SE site. What", "give their best in answering the questions from corners of the world. ", "least 1 point for each upvote of a comment. This will keep the", "could possibly be done? (any one of the following would do.) Award", "points of the user. * Though comments get many upvotes, no points are", "upvotes. * Award a bronze or silver or gold reputation badge based on", "possibly be done? (any one of the following would do.) * Award at", "Award at least 1 point for each upvote of a comment. This will", "the world. * Award some point (nonzero) to the user with a comment", "on the questions or the answers. Why am I asking this question? ", "of the user. Though comments get many upvotes, no points are being", "upvotes of the questions and answers have some points associated. However, there are", "are no points associated with the comments on the questions or the answers.", "the new members of academia.SE site. What could possibly be done? (any one", "increasing the points of the user. * Though comments get many upvotes, no", "In academia.SE the upvotes of the questions and answers have some points associated.", "user with a comment with 5 upvotes. * Award a bronze or silver", "answers. Why am I asking this question? * Few answers just combine the", "just combine the ideas mentioned in the comments and those answers keep getting", "upvotes, no points are being awarded to the user. * This is demotivating", "keep the users entertained and motivated to give their best in answering the", "be done? (any one of the following would do.) * Award at least", "the questions and answers have some points associated. However, there are no points", "question? * Few answers just combine the ideas mentioned in the comments and", "and answers have some points associated. However, there are no points associated with", "questions or the answers. Why am I asking this question? * Few answers", "combine the ideas mentioned in the comments and those answers keep getting upvotes", "each upvote of a comment. This will keep the users entertained and motivated", "world. * Award some point (nonzero) to the user with a comment with", "the user. * Though comments get many upvotes, no points are being awarded", "motivated to give their best in answering the questions from corners of the", "asking this question? * Few answers just combine the ideas mentioned in the", "answering the questions from corners of the world. * Award some point (nonzero)", "and those answers keep getting upvotes there by increasing the points of the", "This will keep the users entertained and motivated to give their best in", "would do.) * Award at least 1 point for each upvote of a", "* This is demotivating for the new members of academia.SE site. What could", "there by increasing the points of the user. * Though comments get many", "Award a bronze or silver or gold reputation badge based on the number", "entertained and motivated to give their best in answering the questions from corners", "will keep the users entertained and motivated to give their best in answering", "site. What could possibly be done? (any one of the following would do.)", "for each upvote of a comment. This will keep the users entertained and", "many upvotes, no points are being awarded to the user. * This is", "the user with a comment with 5 upvotes. * Award a bronze or", "academia.SE the upvotes of the questions and answers have some points associated. However,", "am I asking this question? * Few answers just combine the ideas mentioned", "in answering the questions from corners of the world. * Award some point", "of the following would do.) * Award at least 1 point for each", "those answers keep getting upvotes there by increasing the points of the user.", "1 point for each upvote of a comment. This will keep the users", "(nonzero) to the user with a comment with 5 upvotes. * Award a", "* Award some point (nonzero) to the user with a comment with 5", "users entertained and motivated to give their best in answering the questions from", "corners of the world. * Award some point (nonzero) to the user with", "Few answers just combine the ideas mentioned in the comments and those answers", "questions and answers have some points associated. However, there are no points associated", "some point (nonzero) to the user with a comment with 5 upvotes. ", "the points of the user. Though comments get many upvotes, no points", "I asking this question? * Few answers just combine the ideas mentioned in", "the user. * This is demotivating for the new members of academia.SE site.", "comments on the questions or the answers. Why am I asking this question?", "the following would do.) * Award at least 1 point for each upvote", "upvote of a comment. This will keep the users entertained and motivated to", "for the new members of academia.SE site. What could possibly be done? (any", "ideas mentioned in the comments and those answers keep getting upvotes there by", "upvotes there by increasing the points of the user. * Though comments get", "demotivating for the new members of academia.SE site. What could possibly be done?", "with 5 upvotes. * Award a bronze or silver or gold reputation badge", "comment with 5 upvotes. * Award a bronze or silver or gold reputation", "keep getting upvotes there by increasing the points of the user. * Though", "their best in answering the questions from corners of the world. * Award", "Why am I asking this question? * Few answers just combine the ideas", "* Though comments get many upvotes, no points are being awarded to the", "the answers. Why am I asking this question? * Few answers just combine", "points associated. However, there are no points associated with the comments on the", "in the comments and those answers keep getting upvotes there by increasing the", "a comment with 5 upvotes. * Award a bronze or silver or gold", "of the world. * Award some point (nonzero) to the user with a", "the comments on the questions or the answers. Why am I asking this", "associated. However, there are no points associated with the comments on the questions", "questions from corners of the world. * Award some point (nonzero) to the", "awarded to the user. * This is demotivating for the new members of", "point for each upvote of a comment. This will keep the users entertained", "one of the following would do.) * Award at least 1 point for", "a bronze or silver or gold reputation badge based on the number of", "from corners of the world. * Award some point (nonzero) to the user", "have some points associated. However, there are no points associated with the comments", "and motivated to give their best in answering the questions from corners of", "with a comment with 5 upvotes. * Award a bronze or silver or", "associated with the comments on the questions or the answers. Why am I", "answers keep getting upvotes there by increasing the points of the user. ", "However, there are no points associated with the comments on the questions or", "at least 1 point for each upvote of a comment. This will keep", "get many upvotes, no points are being awarded to the user. This", "answers just combine the ideas mentioned in the comments and those answers keep" ]
[ "education here, but I also do not know if there is a better", "recall seeing any questions here about K-12 education here, but I also do", "Subject line says it all -- I do not recall seeing any questions", "do not know if there is a better Stack Exchange site for that", "it all -- I do not recall seeing any questions here about K-12", "questions here about K-12 education here, but I also do not know if", "seeing any questions here about K-12 education here, but I also do not", "all -- I do not recall seeing any questions here about K-12 education", "not know if there is a better Stack Exchange site for that purpose.", "I do not recall seeing any questions here about K-12 education here, but", "here, but I also do not know if there is a better Stack", "here about K-12 education here, but I also do not know if there", "about K-12 education here, but I also do not know if there is", "I also do not know if there is a better Stack Exchange site", "any questions here about K-12 education here, but I also do not know", "K-12 education here, but I also do not know if there is a", "do not recall seeing any questions here about K-12 education here, but I", "-- I do not recall seeing any questions here about K-12 education here,", "also do not know if there is a better Stack Exchange site for", "line says it all -- I do not recall seeing any questions here", "not recall seeing any questions here about K-12 education here, but I also", "but I also do not know if there is a better Stack Exchange", "says it all -- I do not recall seeing any questions here about" ]
[ "talk. Look at how the New York Times publishes pretty much all of", "the submitted comments. I have posted to the New York Times for 5+", "my comments has ever been censored/blocked/deleted by the editors. It's called freedom of", "Times publishes pretty much all of the submitted comments. I have posted to", "the New York Times publishes pretty much all of the submitted comments. I", "to the New York Times for 5+ years and none of my comments", "people talk. Look at how the New York Times publishes pretty much all", "arises a serious problem? Just let people talk. Look at how the New", "people ask and answer the questions peacefully and without censoring unless there arises", "and without censoring unless there arises a serious problem? Just let people talk.", "New York Times for 5+ years and none of my comments has ever", "just let the people ask and answer the questions peacefully and without censoring", "York Times for 5+ years and none of my comments has ever been", "much all of the submitted comments. I have posted to the New York", "for 5+ years and none of my comments has ever been censored/blocked/deleted by", "deleted, closed, and moved without much justification. Why can't the moderators etc. just", "none of my comments has ever been censored/blocked/deleted by the editors. It's called", "questions peacefully and without censoring unless there arises a serious problem? Just let", "Times for 5+ years and none of my comments has ever been censored/blocked/deleted", "and answer the questions peacefully and without censoring unless there arises a serious", "answer the questions peacefully and without censoring unless there arises a serious problem?", "and comments deleted, closed, and moved without much justification. Why can't the moderators", "of my comments has ever been censored/blocked/deleted by the editors. It's called freedom", "moderators etc. just let the people ask and answer the questions peacefully and", "questions and comments deleted, closed, and moved without much justification. Why can't the", "York Times publishes pretty much all of the submitted comments. I have posted", "without censoring unless there arises a serious problem? Just let people talk. Look", "comments has ever been censored/blocked/deleted by the editors. It's called freedom of speech", "can't the moderators etc. just let the people ask and answer the questions", "posted to the New York Times for 5+ years and none of my", "serious problem? Just let people talk. Look at how the New York Times", "comments. I have posted to the New York Times for 5+ years and", "there arises a serious problem? Just let people talk. Look at how the", "ask and answer the questions peacefully and without censoring unless there arises a", "have posted to the New York Times for 5+ years and none of", "let the people ask and answer the questions peacefully and without censoring unless", "publishes pretty much all of the submitted comments. I have posted to the", "been censored/blocked/deleted by the editors. It's called freedom of speech and freedom of", "without much justification. Why can't the moderators etc. just let the people ask", "the people ask and answer the questions peacefully and without censoring unless there", "closed, and moved without much justification. Why can't the moderators etc. just let", "comments deleted, closed, and moved without much justification. Why can't the moderators etc.", "5+ years and none of my comments has ever been censored/blocked/deleted by the", "justification. Why can't the moderators etc. just let the people ask and answer", "I have posted to the New York Times for 5+ years and none", "New York Times publishes pretty much all of the submitted comments. I have", "let people talk. Look at how the New York Times publishes pretty much", "censored/blocked/deleted by the editors. It's called freedom of speech and freedom of association.", "and moved without much justification. Why can't the moderators etc. just let the", "Why can't the moderators etc. just let the people ask and answer the", "unless there arises a serious problem? Just let people talk. Look at how", "has ever been censored/blocked/deleted by the editors. It's called freedom of speech and", "seen multiple questions and comments deleted, closed, and moved without much justification. Why", "censoring unless there arises a serious problem? Just let people talk. Look at", "all of the submitted comments. I have posted to the New York Times", "years and none of my comments has ever been censored/blocked/deleted by the editors.", "at how the New York Times publishes pretty much all of the submitted", "moved without much justification. Why can't the moderators etc. just let the people", "of the submitted comments. I have posted to the New York Times for", "I have seen multiple questions and comments deleted, closed, and moved without much", "multiple questions and comments deleted, closed, and moved without much justification. Why can't", "have seen multiple questions and comments deleted, closed, and moved without much justification.", "and none of my comments has ever been censored/blocked/deleted by the editors. It's", "much justification. Why can't the moderators etc. just let the people ask and", "Just let people talk. Look at how the New York Times publishes pretty", "Look at how the New York Times publishes pretty much all of the", "ever been censored/blocked/deleted by the editors. It's called freedom of speech and freedom", "submitted comments. I have posted to the New York Times for 5+ years", "the New York Times for 5+ years and none of my comments has", "problem? Just let people talk. Look at how the New York Times publishes", "pretty much all of the submitted comments. I have posted to the New", "a serious problem? Just let people talk. Look at how the New York", "etc. just let the people ask and answer the questions peacefully and without", "the moderators etc. just let the people ask and answer the questions peacefully", "how the New York Times publishes pretty much all of the submitted comments.", "peacefully and without censoring unless there arises a serious problem? Just let people", "the questions peacefully and without censoring unless there arises a serious problem? Just" ]
[ "themselves. --- ¹ which is as follows: > > Questions about problems facing", "at least 39 instances of blanket close reasons like: “This is not about", "> > Questions about problems facing undergraduate students are off-topic unless they can", "about problems facing undergraduate students are off-topic unless they can also apply to", "our scope. Should this proposal be accepted, the kind of undergraduate questions that", "the kind of undergraduate questions that is off-topic now will still be off-topic", "the last three months: * the undergraduate close reason¹ was used 18 times", "non-academic education, * questions specific to undergraduate students. The detailed phrasing shall be", "have to type this reason themselves. --- ¹ which is as follows: >", "helpful information for the asker. They do not define our scope. Should this", "subject of an academic discipline and not about academia itself + at least", "not appear to be about academia, within the scope defined in the [help", "the subject of an academic discipline, * questions about non-academic education, * questions", "slots for custom close reasons available. As all of these are currently used,", "the subject of an academic discipline and not about academia itself + at", "the undergraduate close reason¹ with a more general out of scope reason. Instead", "in answers to this question. Note that we have only three slots for", "following is extracted from the [question close stats](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools/question-close-stats) (10 k only). In the", "change of our scope? Canned close reasons mostly exist to streamline close voting", "only).* In the last three months: * the undergraduate close reason¹ was used", "streamline close voting and to leave helpful information for the asker. They do", "with a custom close reason (i.e., typed by the close voter). This includes:", "of undergraduate questions that is off-topic now will still be off-topic – close", "scope* reason. Instead of the standard phrasing for such a close reason², the", "includes: + 21 close reasons that indicate that the question is about the", "be addressed in answers to this question. Note that we have only three", "of all closures). 84 questions were closed with a custom close reason", "close reason¹ was used 18 times (that’s only about 3 % of all", "with a more general out of scope reason. Instead of the standard phrasing", "The detailed phrasing shall be addressed in answers to this question. Note that", "close reasons mostly exist to streamline close voting and to leave helpful information", "graduate or post-graduate academicians as described in [What topics can I ask about", "education, questions specific to undergraduate students. The detailed phrasing shall be addressed", "Canned close reasons mostly exist to streamline close voting and to leave helpful", "be accepted, the kind of undergraduate questions that is off-topic now will still", "questions that is off-topic now will still be off-topic – close voters may", "proposal be accepted, the kind of undergraduate questions that is off-topic now will", "– close voters may just have to type this reason themselves. --- ¹", "can also apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians as described in [What topics", "voting and to leave helpful information for the asker. They do not define", "close reasons that indicate that the question is about the subject of an", "a change of our scope? Canned close reasons mostly exist to streamline close", "reason², the latter shall also explicitly mention common cases and provide helpful links", "about the subject of an academic discipline and not about academia itself +", "* questions about the subject of an academic discipline, * questions about non-academic", "reason themselves. --- ¹ which is as follows: > > Questions about problems", "apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians as described in [What topics can I", "a more general out of scope reason. Instead of the standard phrasing for", "academic discipline, * questions about non-academic education, * questions specific to undergraduate students.", "(that’s only about 3 % of all closures). * 84 questions were closed", "off-topic unless they can also apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians as described", "subject of an academic discipline, * questions about non-academic education, * questions specific", "also apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians as described in [What topics can", "were closed with a custom close reason (i.e., typed by the close voter).", "detailed phrasing shall be addressed in answers to this question. Note that we", "are currently used, introducing a new close reason requires abolishing an existing one.", "itself + at least 39 instances of blanket close reasons like: “This is", "reason (i.e., typed by the close voter). This includes: + 21 close reasons", "a close reason², the latter shall also explicitly mention common cases and provide", "about the subject of an academic discipline, * questions about non-academic education, ", "that we have only three slots for custom close reasons available. As all", "topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > > ² which would be:", "we have only three slots for custom close reasons available. As all of", "would be: > > This question does not appear to be about academia,", "and provide helpful links (as possible within the 400 available characters), for example:", "one. ### Does this mean a change of our scope? Canned close reasons", "scope. Should this proposal be accepted, the kind of undergraduate questions that is", "introducing a new close reason requires abolishing an existing one.* ### Does this", "* questions about non-academic education, * questions specific to undergraduate students. The detailed", "kind of undergraduate questions that is off-topic now will still be off-topic –", "academia.” ### Proposal Let’s replace the undergraduate close reason¹ with a more general", "this proposal be accepted, the kind of undergraduate questions that is off-topic now", "may just have to type this reason themselves. --- ¹ which is as", "reason. Instead of the standard phrasing for such a close reason², the latter", "+ 21 close reasons that indicate that the question is about the subject", "voter). This includes: + 21 close reasons that indicate that the question is", "questions about the subject of an academic discipline, * questions about non-academic education,", "close stats](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools/question-close-stats) (10 k only).* In the last three months: * the undergraduate", "is as follows: > > Questions about problems facing undergraduate students are off-topic", "about academia.” ### Proposal Let’s replace the undergraduate close reason¹ with a more", "to leave helpful information for the asker. They do not define our scope.", "as follows: > > Questions about problems facing undergraduate students are off-topic unless", "is not about academia.” ### Proposal Let’s replace the undergraduate close reason¹ with", "As all of these are currently used, introducing a new close reason requires", "undergraduate questions that is off-topic now will still be off-topic – close voters", "like: “This is not about academia.” ### Proposal Let’s replace the undergraduate close", "k only).* In the last three months: * the undergraduate close reason¹ was", "is off-topic now will still be off-topic – close voters may just have", "close reason¹ with a more general out of scope reason. Instead of the", "leave helpful information for the asker. They do not define our scope. Should", "voters may just have to type this reason themselves. --- ¹ which is", "have only three slots for custom close reasons available. As all of these", "### Proposal Let’s replace the undergraduate close reason¹ with a more general out", "cases and provide helpful links (as possible within the 400 available characters), for", "months: the undergraduate close reason¹ was used 18 times (that’s only about", "does not appear to be about academia, within the scope defined in the", "which would be: > > This question does not appear to be about", "Should this proposal be accepted, the kind of undergraduate questions that is off-topic", "by the close voter). This includes: + 21 close reasons that indicate that", "new close reason requires abolishing an existing one.* ### Does this mean a", "example: * questions about the subject of an academic discipline, * questions about", "also explicitly mention common cases and provide helpful links (as possible within the", "asker. They do not define our scope. Should this proposal be accepted, the", "unless they can also apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians as described in", "[What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > > ² which would", "possible within the 400 available characters), for example: * questions about the subject", "the close voter). This includes: + 21 close reasons that indicate that the", "be off-topic – close voters may just have to type this reason themselves.", "> Questions about problems facing undergraduate students are off-topic unless they can also", "links (as possible within the 400 available characters), for example: * questions about", "Proposal Let’s replace the undergraduate close reason¹ with a more general out of", "> > This question does not appear to be about academia, within the", "a custom close reason (i.e., typed by the close voter). This includes: +", "mostly exist to streamline close voting and to leave helpful information for the", "The following is extracted from the [question close stats](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools/question-close-stats) (10 k only).* In", "within the 400 available characters), for example: * questions about the subject of", "to type this reason themselves. --- ¹ which is as follows: > >", "close reason², the latter shall also explicitly mention common cases and provide helpful", "reason requires abolishing an existing one.* ### Does this mean a change of", "are off-topic unless they can also apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians as", "last three months: * the undergraduate close reason¹ was used 18 times (that’s", "exist to streamline close voting and to leave helpful information for the asker.", "extracted from the [question close stats](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools/question-close-stats) (10 k only).* In the last three", "blanket close reasons like: “This is not about academia.” ### Proposal Let’s replace", "times (that’s only about 3 % of all closures). * 84 questions were", "not about academia.” ### Proposal Let’s replace the undergraduate close reason¹ with a", "is extracted from the [question close stats](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools/question-close-stats) (10 k only).* In the last", "+ at least 39 instances of blanket close reasons like: “This is not", "questions were closed with a custom close reason (i.e., typed by the close", "three months: * the undergraduate close reason¹ was used 18 times (that’s only", "This question does not appear to be about academia, within the scope defined", "this reason themselves. --- ¹ which is as follows: > > Questions about", "be about academia, within the scope defined in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). > >", "instances of blanket close reasons like: “This is not about academia.” ### Proposal", "question does not appear to be about academia, within the scope defined in", "is about the subject of an academic discipline and not about academia itself", "of scope* reason. Instead of the standard phrasing for such a close reason²,", "off-topic now will still be off-topic – close voters may just have to", "for such a close reason², the latter shall also explicitly mention common cases", "I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > > ² which would be: > >", "follows: > > Questions about problems facing undergraduate students are off-topic unless they", "this question. Note that we have only three slots for custom close reasons", "phrasing shall be addressed in answers to this question. Note that we have", "and to leave helpful information for the asker. They do not define our", "close reasons available. As all of these are currently used, introducing a new", "[question close stats](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools/question-close-stats) (10 k only).* In the last three months: * the", "discipline, * questions about non-academic education, * questions specific to undergraduate students. The", "information for the asker. They do not define our scope. Should this proposal", "> > > ² which would be: > > This question does not", "of an academic discipline and not about academia itself + at least 39", "out of scope reason. Instead of the standard phrasing for such a close", "Note that we have only three slots for custom close reasons available. As", "to be about academia, within the scope defined in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). >", "for custom close reasons available. As all of these are currently used, introducing", "undergraduate* close reason¹ with a more general out of scope reason. Instead of", "only three slots for custom close reasons available. As all of these are", "that is off-topic now will still be off-topic – close voters may just", "Statistical background The following is extracted from the [question close stats](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools/question-close-stats) (10 k", "currently used, introducing a new close reason requires abolishing an existing one. ###", "the 400 available characters), for example: * questions about the subject of an", "or post-graduate academicians as described in [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)", "of our scope? Canned close reasons mostly exist to streamline close voting and", "undergraduate close reason¹ was used 18 times (that’s only about 3 % of", "type this reason themselves. --- ¹ which is as follows: > > Questions", "undergraduate students are off-topic unless they can also apply to graduate or post-graduate", "reasons available. As all of these are currently used, introducing a new close", "facing undergraduate students are off-topic unless they can also apply to graduate or", "### Statistical background The following is extracted from the [question close stats](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools/question-close-stats) (10", "academic discipline and not about academia itself + at least 39 instances of", "background The following is extracted from the [question close stats](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools/question-close-stats) (10 k only).", "shall also explicitly mention common cases and provide helpful links (as possible within", "close voters may just have to type this reason themselves. --- ¹ which", "ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > > ² which would be: > > This", "from the [question close stats](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools/question-close-stats) (10 k only). In the last three months:", "about non-academic education, * questions specific to undergraduate students. The detailed phrasing shall", "mention common cases and provide helpful links (as possible within the 400 available", "stats](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools/question-close-stats) (10 k only).* In the last three months: * the undergraduate close", "as described in [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > >", "available characters), for example: * questions about the subject of an academic discipline,", "the undergraduate close reason¹ was used 18 times (that’s only about 3 %", "latter shall also explicitly mention common cases and provide helpful links (as possible", "explicitly mention common cases and provide helpful links (as possible within the 400", "reasons mostly exist to streamline close voting and to leave helpful information for", "questions about non-academic education, * questions specific to undergraduate students. The detailed phrasing", "was used 18 times (that’s only about 3 % of all closures). ", "all closures). 84 questions were closed with a custom close reason (i.e.,", "undergraduate students. The detailed phrasing shall be addressed in answers to this question.", "general out of scope reason. Instead of the standard phrasing for such a", "closures). * 84 questions were closed with a custom close reason (i.e., typed", "reason¹ with a more general out of scope reason. Instead of the standard", "close voting and to leave helpful information for the asker. They do not", "now will still be off-topic – close voters may just have to type", "the [question close stats](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tools/question-close-stats) (10 k only).* In the last three months: ", "this mean a change of our scope? Canned close reasons mostly exist to", "3 % of all closures). 84 questions were closed with a custom", "indicate that the question is about the subject of an academic discipline and", "to streamline close voting and to leave helpful information for the asker. They", "students are off-topic unless they can also apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians", "Instead of the standard phrasing for such a close reason², the latter shall", "% of all closures). * 84 questions were closed with a custom close", "an academic discipline and not about academia itself + at least 39 instances", "typed by the close voter). This includes: + 21 close reasons that indicate", "* 84 questions were closed with a custom close reason (i.e., typed by", "three slots for custom close reasons available. As all of these are currently", "post-graduate academicians as described in [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) >", "close reason (i.e., typed by the close voter). This includes: + 21 close", "custom close reason (i.e., typed by the close voter). This includes: + 21", "the latter shall also explicitly mention common cases and provide helpful links (as", "an academic discipline, * questions about non-academic education, * questions specific to undergraduate", "of these are currently used, introducing a new close reason requires abolishing an", "about 3 % of all closures). * 84 questions were closed with a", "helpful links (as possible within the 400 available characters), for example: * questions", "accepted, the kind of undergraduate questions that is off-topic now will still be", "define our scope. Should this proposal be accepted, the kind of undergraduate questions", "do not define our scope. Should this proposal be accepted, the kind of", "existing one.* ### Does this mean a change of our scope? Canned close", "used 18 times (that’s only about 3 % of all closures). * 84", "In the last three months: * the undergraduate close reason¹ was used 18", "a new close reason requires abolishing an existing one.* ### Does this mean", "of the standard phrasing for such a close reason², the latter shall also", "abolishing an existing one.* ### Does this mean a change of our scope?", "the question is about the subject of an academic discipline and not about", "these are currently used, introducing a new close reason requires abolishing an existing", "close reason requires abolishing an existing one.* ### Does this mean a change", "close voter). This includes: + 21 close reasons that indicate that the question", "Let’s replace the undergraduate close reason¹ with a more general out of scope", "available. As all of these are currently used, introducing a new close reason", "standard phrasing for such a close reason², the latter shall also explicitly mention", "only about 3 % of all closures). * 84 questions were closed with", "just have to type this reason themselves. --- ¹ which is as follows:", "Questions about problems facing undergraduate students are off-topic unless they can also apply", "they can also apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians as described in [What", "of blanket close reasons like: “This is not about academia.” ### Proposal Let’s", "¹ which is as follows: > > Questions about problems facing undergraduate students", "### Does this mean a change of our scope? Canned close reasons mostly", "discipline and not about academia itself + at least 39 instances of blanket", "(as possible within the 400 available characters), for example: * questions about the", "about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > > ² which would be: > > This question", "close reasons like: “This is not about academia.” ### Proposal Let’s replace the", "in [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > > ² which", "reasons like: “This is not about academia.” ### Proposal Let’s replace the undergraduate", "more general out of scope reason. Instead of the standard phrasing for such", "phrasing for such a close reason², the latter shall also explicitly mention common", "about academia, within the scope defined in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). > > >", "21 close reasons that indicate that the question is about the subject of", "mean a change of our scope? Canned close reasons mostly exist to streamline", "characters), for example: * questions about the subject of an academic discipline, ", "academia itself + at least 39 instances of blanket close reasons like: “This", "the standard phrasing for such a close reason², the latter shall also explicitly", "reason¹ was used 18 times (that’s only about 3 % of all closures).", "to undergraduate students. The detailed phrasing shall be addressed in answers to this", "not define our scope. Should this proposal be accepted, the kind of undergraduate", "They do not define our scope. Should this proposal be accepted, the kind", " questions specific to undergraduate students. The detailed phrasing shall be addressed in", "question is about the subject of an academic discipline and not about academia", "that the question is about the subject of an academic discipline and not", "the asker. They do not define our scope. Should this proposal be accepted,", "will still be off-topic – close voters may just have to type this", "scope? Canned close reasons mostly exist to streamline close voting and to leave", "still be off-topic – close voters may just have to type this reason", "18 times (that’s only about 3 % of all closures). * 84 questions", "to this question. Note that we have only three slots for custom close", "least 39 instances of blanket close reasons like: “This is not about academia.”", "replace the undergraduate* close reason¹ with a more general out of scope reason.", "to graduate or post-graduate academicians as described in [What topics can I ask", "of an academic discipline, * questions about non-academic education, * questions specific to", "problems facing undergraduate students are off-topic unless they can also apply to graduate", "400 available characters), for example: * questions about the subject of an academic", "answers to this question. Note that we have only three slots for custom", "here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > > ² which would be: > > This question does", "custom close reasons available. As all of these are currently used, introducing a", "“This is not about academia.” ### Proposal Let’s replace the undergraduate* close reason¹", "used, introducing a new close reason requires abolishing an existing one.* ### Does", "84 questions were closed with a custom close reason (i.e., typed by the", "off-topic – close voters may just have to type this reason themselves. ---", "an existing one.* ### Does this mean a change of our scope? Canned", "appear to be about academia, within the scope defined in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic).", "closed with a custom close reason (i.e., typed by the close voter). This", "--- ¹ which is as follows: > > Questions about problems facing undergraduate", "for the asker. They do not define our scope. Should this proposal be", "39 instances of blanket close reasons like: “This is not about academia.” ###", "can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > > ² which would be: >", "specific to undergraduate students. The detailed phrasing shall be addressed in answers to", "common cases and provide helpful links (as possible within the 400 available characters),", "> This question does not appear to be about academia, within the scope", "such a close reason², the latter shall also explicitly mention common cases and", "This includes: + 21 close reasons that indicate that the question is about", "Does this mean a change of our scope? Canned close reasons mostly exist", "all of these are currently used, introducing a new close reason requires abolishing", "question. Note that we have only three slots for custom close reasons available.", "be: > > This question does not appear to be about academia, within", "academicians as described in [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > >", "² which would be: > > This question does not appear to be", "and not about academia itself + at least 39 instances of blanket close", "our scope? Canned close reasons mostly exist to streamline close voting and to", "requires abolishing an existing one. ### Does this mean a change of our", "which is as follows: > > Questions about problems facing undergraduate students are", "questions specific to undergraduate students. The detailed phrasing shall be addressed in answers", "not about academia itself + at least 39 instances of blanket close reasons", "(10 k only).* In the last three months: * the undergraduate close reason¹", "addressed in answers to this question. Note that we have only three slots", "that indicate that the question is about the subject of an academic discipline", "students. The detailed phrasing shall be addressed in answers to this question. Note", "provide helpful links (as possible within the 400 available characters), for example: ", " the undergraduate close reason¹ was used 18 times (that’s only about 3", "shall be addressed in answers to this question. Note that we have only", "(i.e., typed by the close voter). This includes: + 21 close reasons that", "described in [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) > > > ²", "reasons that indicate that the question is about the subject of an academic", "> > ² which would be: > > This question does not appear", "for example: questions about the subject of an academic discipline, * questions", "> ² which would be: > > This question does not appear to", "about academia itself + at least 39 instances of blanket close reasons like:" ]
[ "an associate professor request from a postdoc to stay more than 10 h", "report this behavior and what legal consequences this professor can face. Is this", "see an associate professor request from a postdoc to stay more than 10", "am surprised to see an associate professor request from a postdoc to stay", "I need advice how to report this behavior and what legal consequences this", "associate professor request from a postdoc to stay more than 10 h per", "I am surprised to see an associate professor request from a postdoc to", "to see an associate professor request from a postdoc to stay more than", "than 10 h per day. I need advice how to report this behavior", "that is against law and working ethic, and I am surprised to see", "my advisors shared contains a sentence that is against law and working ethic,", "professor request from a postdoc to stay more than 10 h per day.", "sentence that is against law and working ethic, and I am surprised to", "more than 10 h per day. I need advice how to report this", "ethic, and I am surprised to see an associate professor request from a", "advice how to report this behavior and what legal consequences this professor can", "this behavior and what legal consequences this professor can face. Is this a", "from a postdoc to stay more than 10 h per day. I need", "law and working ethic, and I am surprised to see an associate professor", "of my advisors shared contains a sentence that is against law and working", "contains a sentence that is against law and working ethic, and I am", "is against law and working ethic, and I am surprised to see an", "and I am surprised to see an associate professor request from a postdoc", "An ad that one of my advisors shared contains a sentence that is", "request from a postdoc to stay more than 10 h per day. I", "stay more than 10 h per day. I need advice how to report", "per day. I need advice how to report this behavior and what legal", "that one of my advisors shared contains a sentence that is against law", "a sentence that is against law and working ethic, and I am surprised", "advisors shared contains a sentence that is against law and working ethic, and", "to stay more than 10 h per day. I need advice how to", "10 h per day. I need advice how to report this behavior and", "working ethic, and I am surprised to see an associate professor request from", "postdoc to stay more than 10 h per day. I need advice how", "behavior and what legal consequences this professor can face. Is this a suitable", "ad that one of my advisors shared contains a sentence that is against", "and working ethic, and I am surprised to see an associate professor request", "shared contains a sentence that is against law and working ethic, and I", "need advice how to report this behavior and what legal consequences this professor", "day. I need advice how to report this behavior and what legal consequences", "how to report this behavior and what legal consequences this professor can face.", "to report this behavior and what legal consequences this professor can face. Is", "and what legal consequences this professor can face. Is this a suitable place?", "one of my advisors shared contains a sentence that is against law and", "h per day. I need advice how to report this behavior and what", "surprised to see an associate professor request from a postdoc to stay more", "a postdoc to stay more than 10 h per day. I need advice", "against law and working ethic, and I am surprised to see an associate" ]
[ "like to know if i can publish the thesis here on this site,", "idea that what spreading. I would like to know if i can publish", "can publish the thesis here on this site, and if so please how", "here on this site, and if so please how can I go about", "It's an idea that what spreading. I would like to know if i", "publish my Master's thesis, I am sure It's an idea that what spreading.", "an idea that what spreading. I would like to know if i can", "I am sure It's an idea that what spreading. I would like to", "have been trying to publish my Master's thesis, I am sure It's an", "to publish my Master's thesis, I am sure It's an idea that what", "to know if i can publish the thesis here on this site, and", "that what spreading. I would like to know if i can publish the", "sure It's an idea that what spreading. I would like to know if", "I would like to know if i can publish the thesis here on", "if i can publish the thesis here on this site, and if so", "i can publish the thesis here on this site, and if so please", "would like to know if i can publish the thesis here on this", "thesis here on this site, and if so please how can I go", "been trying to publish my Master's thesis, I am sure It's an idea", "spreading. I would like to know if i can publish the thesis here", "publish the thesis here on this site, and if so please how can", "on this site, and if so please how can I go about it?", "my Master's thesis, I am sure It's an idea that what spreading. I", "know if i can publish the thesis here on this site, and if", "Master's thesis, I am sure It's an idea that what spreading. I would", "what spreading. I would like to know if i can publish the thesis", "the thesis here on this site, and if so please how can I", "thesis, I am sure It's an idea that what spreading. I would like", "trying to publish my Master's thesis, I am sure It's an idea that", "I have been trying to publish my Master's thesis, I am sure It's", "am sure It's an idea that what spreading. I would like to know" ]
[ "academicians > > > I propose to replace this by: > > [do", "not even exist accurate translations of the words undergraduate and graduate student to", "Close reasons, other help texts, etc. shall be changed accordingly. This includes the", "separation between undergraduate and graduate students is not universal and thus not generally", "this category. ### This question Use votes on the question to indicate your", "Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734), there is no difference between the two definitions. * The separation", "questions about] > > > * Undergraduate admissions > * Undergraduate life and", "definitions. * The separation between undergraduate and graduate students is not universal and", "question Use votes on the question to indicate your indicate your agreement or", "that isn’t needed to see that they do not fall into this category.", "there do not even exist accurate translations of the words undergraduate and graduate", "still contains the word undergraduate,* it only requires a very basic understanding of", "the nest, etc.) > > > Close reasons, other help texts, etc. shall", "system. For most question, even that isn’t needed to see that they do", "very basic understanding of the underlying system. For most question, even that isn’t", "to replace this by: > > [do not ask questions about] > >", "> > [do not ask questions about] > > > * Undergraduate admissions", "or disagreement with the proposal. Use answers to suggest amendments or elaborate your", "The separation between undergraduate and graduate students is not universal and thus not", "admissions > * Undergraduate life and culture (sports, nightlife, dorms, leaving the nest,", "indicate your agreement or disagreement with the proposal. Use answers to suggest amendments", "translations of the words undergraduate and graduate student to the German language. While", "the words undergraduate and graduate student to the German language. While the proposed", "the proposed wording still contains the word undergraduate, it only requires a very", "to see that they do not fall into this category. ### This question", "between the two definitions. * The separation between undergraduate and graduate students is", "to indicate your indicate your agreement or disagreement with the proposal. Use answers", "definition of our scope](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) with respect to undergraduate questions is: > > [do", "be changed accordingly. This includes the outcome of [this proposal of mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734). ###", "* The current definition is difficult to grasp and a source of dispute.", "* The current definition often leads to questions being voted to close for", "reasons, other help texts, etc. shall be changed accordingly. This includes the outcome", "the word undergraduate. * Going by the outcome of [this Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734), there", "accordingly. This includes the outcome of [this proposal of mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734). ### Rationale ", "is difficult to grasp and a source of dispute. The current definition", "not ask questions about] > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not", "changed accordingly. This includes the outcome of [this proposal of mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734). ### Rationale", "the two definitions. * The separation between undergraduate and graduate students is not", "> I propose to replace this by: > > [do not ask questions", "> * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians", "to questions being voted to close for no other apparent reason than containing", "of our scope](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) with respect to undergraduate questions is: > > [do not", "help texts, etc. shall be changed accordingly. This includes the outcome of [this", "nightlife, dorms, leaving the nest, etc.) > > > Close reasons, other help", "nest, etc.) > > > Close reasons, other help texts, etc. shall be", "understanding of the underlying system. For most question, even that isn’t needed to", "wording still contains the word undergraduate, it only requires a very basic understanding", "> * Undergraduate admissions > * Undergraduate life and culture (sports, nightlife, dorms,", "Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > >", "to close for no other apparent reason than containing the word undergraduate. ", "other apparent reason than containing the word undergraduate.* * Going by the outcome", "outcome of [this Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734), there is no difference between the two definitions.", "underlying system. For most question, even that isn’t needed to see that they", "mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734). ### Rationale * The current definition is difficult to grasp and a", "Rationale * The current definition is difficult to grasp and a source of", "of [this proposal of mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734). ### Rationale * The current definition is difficult", "post-graduate academicians > > > I propose to replace this by: > >", "and a source of dispute. * The current definition often leads to questions", "Undergraduate admissions > * Undergraduate life and culture (sports, nightlife, dorms, leaving the", "example, there do not even exist accurate translations of the words undergraduate and", "understood. For example, there do not even exist accurate translations of the words", "undergraduate, it only requires a very basic understanding of the underlying system. For", "a very basic understanding of the underlying system. For most question, even that", "current definition is difficult to grasp and a source of dispute. * The", "current definition often leads to questions being voted to close for no other", "> * Undergraduate life and culture (sports, nightlife, dorms, leaving the nest, etc.)", "is: > > [do not ask questions about] > > > * Undergraduate-specific", "voted to close for no other apparent reason than containing the word undergraduate.", "even exist accurate translations of the words undergraduate and graduate student to the", "scope](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) with respect to undergraduate questions is: > > [do not ask questions", "questions being voted to close for no other apparent reason than containing the", "> > I propose to replace this by: > > [do not ask", "is not universal and thus not generally understood. For example, there do not", "word undergraduate, it only requires a very basic understanding of the underlying system.", "The current definition often leads to questions being voted to close for no", "student* to the German language. While the proposed wording still contains the word", "universal and thus not generally understood. For example, there do not even exist", "that they do not fall into this category. ### This question Use votes", "the question to indicate your indicate your agreement or disagreement with the proposal.", "undergraduate and graduate student to the German language. While the proposed wording still", "outcome of [this proposal of mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734). ### Rationale * The current definition is", "> Close reasons, other help texts, etc. shall be changed accordingly. This includes", "> [do not ask questions about] > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that", "do not even exist accurate translations of the words undergraduate and graduate student", "### Rationale * The current definition is difficult to grasp and a source", "about] > > > * Undergraduate admissions > * Undergraduate life and culture", "of the underlying system. For most question, even that isn’t needed to see", "between undergraduate and graduate students is not universal and thus not generally understood.", "not generally understood. For example, there do not even exist accurate translations of", "into this category. ### This question Use votes on the question to indicate", "see that they do not fall into this category. ### This question Use", "proposal of mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734). ### Rationale * The current definition is difficult to grasp", "For example, there do not even exist accurate translations of the words undergraduate", "being voted to close for no other apparent reason than containing the word", "with respect to undergraduate questions is: > > [do not ask questions about]", "of [this Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734), there is no difference between the two definitions. ", "only requires a very basic understanding of the underlying system. For most question,", "Currently [the definition of our scope](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) with respect to undergraduate questions is: >", "and culture (sports, nightlife, dorms, leaving the nest, etc.) > > > Close", " Undergraduate life and culture (sports, nightlife, dorms, leaving the nest, etc.) >", "> > [do not ask questions about] > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues", "agreement or disagreement with the proposal. Use answers to suggest amendments or elaborate", "the outcome of [this Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734), there is no difference between the two", "> > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate", "### This question Use votes on the question to indicate your indicate your", "Proposal Currently [the definition of our scope](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) with respect to undergraduate questions is:", "culture (sports, nightlife, dorms, leaving the nest, etc.) > > > Close reasons,", "for no other apparent reason than containing the word undergraduate. * Going by", "on the question to indicate your indicate your agreement or disagreement with the", "by: > > [do not ask questions about] > > > * Undergraduate", "Undergraduate life and culture (sports, nightlife, dorms, leaving the nest, etc.) > >", "texts, etc. shall be changed accordingly. This includes the outcome of [this proposal", "and thus not generally understood. For example, there do not even exist accurate", "could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > > > I propose", "of dispute. * The current definition often leads to questions being voted to", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734), there is no difference between the two definitions. * The separation between", "* Going by the outcome of [this Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734), there is no difference", "this by: > > [do not ask questions about] > > > ", "to the German language. While the proposed wording still contains the word undergraduate,", "The current definition is difficult to grasp and a source of dispute. ", "leaving the nest, etc.) > > > Close reasons, other help texts, etc.", "difficult to grasp and a source of dispute. * The current definition often", "* The separation between undergraduate and graduate students is not universal and thus", "etc.) > > > Close reasons, other help texts, etc. shall be changed", "not ask questions about] > > > * Undergraduate admissions > * Undergraduate", "word undergraduate. * Going by the outcome of [this Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734), there is", "ask questions about] > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply", "no difference between the two definitions. * The separation between undergraduate and graduate", "most question, even that isn’t needed to see that they do not fall", "your agreement or disagreement with the proposal. Use answers to suggest amendments or", "While the proposed wording still contains the word undergraduate, it only requires a", "[do not ask questions about] > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could", "not fall into this category. ### This question Use votes on the question", "respect to undergraduate questions is: > > [do not ask questions about] >", "For most question, even that isn’t needed to see that they do not", "to grasp and a source of dispute. * The current definition often leads", "* Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians >", "[do not ask questions about] > > > * Undergraduate admissions > ", "question, even that isn’t needed to see that they do not fall into", "disagreement with the proposal. Use answers to suggest amendments or elaborate your disagreement.", "apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > > > I propose to replace", "leads to questions being voted to close for no other apparent reason than", "other help texts, etc. shall be changed accordingly. This includes the outcome of", "than containing the word undergraduate.* * Going by the outcome of [this Meta", "[the definition of our scope](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) with respect to undergraduate questions is: > >", "of mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734). ### Rationale * The current definition is difficult to grasp and", "grasp and a source of dispute. * The current definition often leads to", "students is not universal and thus not generally understood. For example, there do", "thus not generally understood. For example, there do not even exist accurate translations", "questions about] > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to", "containing the word undergraduate. * Going by the outcome of [this Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734),", "source of dispute. * The current definition often leads to questions being voted", "undergraduate questions is: > > [do not ask questions about] > > >", "undergraduate. * Going by the outcome of [this Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734), there is no", "Use votes on the question to indicate your indicate your agreement or disagreement", "graduate student to the German language. While the proposed wording still contains the", "two definitions. * The separation between undergraduate and graduate students is not universal", "needed to see that they do not fall into this category. ### This", "questions is: > > [do not ask questions about] > > > ", "shall be changed accordingly. This includes the outcome of [this proposal of mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734).", "propose to replace this by: > > [do not* ask questions about] >", "that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > > > I", "> > Close reasons, other help texts, etc. shall be changed accordingly. This", "about] > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate", "> > > * Undergraduate admissions > * Undergraduate life and culture (sports,", "by the outcome of [this Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734), there is no difference between the", "indicate your indicate your agreement or disagreement with the proposal. Use answers to", "isn’t needed to see that they do not fall into this category. ###", "the underlying system. For most question, even that isn’t needed to see that", "Going by the outcome of [this Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734), there is no difference between", "replace this by: > > [do not ask questions about] > > >", "> > > I propose to replace this by: > > [do not", "and graduate students is not universal and thus not generally understood. For example,", "do not fall into this category. ### This question Use votes on the", "language. While the proposed wording still contains the word undergraduate, it only requires", "there is no difference between the two definitions. * The separation between undergraduate", "contains the word undergraduate, it only requires a very basic understanding of the", "issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > > >", "* Undergraduate admissions > * Undergraduate life and culture (sports, nightlife, dorms, leaving", "reason than containing the word undergraduate. * Going by the outcome of [this", "I propose to replace this by: > > [do not ask questions about]", "it only requires a very basic understanding of the underlying system. For most", "generally understood. For example, there do not even exist accurate translations of the", "the word undergraduate, it only requires a very basic understanding of the underlying", "difference between the two definitions. * The separation between undergraduate and graduate students", "etc. shall be changed accordingly. This includes the outcome of [this proposal of", "the German language. While the proposed wording still contains the word undergraduate, it", "to graduate or post-graduate academicians > > > I propose to replace this", "life and culture (sports, nightlife, dorms, leaving the nest, etc.) > > >", "includes the outcome of [this proposal of mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734). ### Rationale * The current", "ask questions about] > > > * Undergraduate admissions > * Undergraduate life", "to undergraduate questions is: > > [do not ask questions about] > >", "of the words undergraduate and graduate student to the German language. While the", "basic understanding of the underlying system. For most question, even that isn’t needed", "your indicate your agreement or disagreement with the proposal. Use answers to suggest", "graduate or post-graduate academicians > > > I propose to replace this by:", "### Proposal Currently [the definition of our scope](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) with respect to undergraduate questions", "proposed wording still contains the word undergraduate, it only requires a very basic", "apparent reason than containing the word undergraduate. * Going by the outcome of", "This question Use votes on the question to indicate your indicate your agreement", "fall into this category. ### This question Use votes on the question to", "question to indicate your indicate your agreement or disagreement with the proposal. Use", "> > > Close reasons, other help texts, etc. shall be changed accordingly.", "> > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or", "the outcome of [this proposal of mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734). ### Rationale * The current definition", "undergraduate and graduate students is not universal and thus not generally understood. For", "not universal and thus not generally understood. For example, there do not even", "they do not fall into this category. ### This question Use votes on", "requires a very basic understanding of the underlying system. For most question, even", "or post-graduate academicians > > > I propose to replace this by: >", "> > * Undergraduate admissions > * Undergraduate life and culture (sports, nightlife,", "(sports, nightlife, dorms, leaving the nest, etc.) > > > Close reasons, other", "[this proposal of mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734). ### Rationale * The current definition is difficult to", "definition often leads to questions being voted to close for no other apparent", "close for no other apparent reason than containing the word undergraduate. * Going", "exist accurate translations of the words undergraduate and graduate student to the German", "votes on the question to indicate your indicate your agreement or disagreement with", "not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > > > I propose to", "dispute. * The current definition often leads to questions being voted to close", "accurate translations of the words undergraduate and graduate student to the German language.", "category. ### This question Use votes on the question to indicate your indicate", "often leads to questions being voted to close for no other apparent reason", "our scope](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) with respect to undergraduate questions is: > > [do not ask", "This includes the outcome of [this proposal of mine](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3783/7734). ### Rationale * The", "a source of dispute. * The current definition often leads to questions being", "even that isn’t needed to see that they do not fall into this", "is no difference between the two definitions. * The separation between undergraduate and", "no other apparent reason than containing the word undergraduate. * Going by the", "definition is difficult to grasp and a source of dispute. * The current", "dorms, leaving the nest, etc.) > > > Close reasons, other help texts,", "words undergraduate and graduate student to the German language. While the proposed wording", "> [do not ask questions about] > > > * Undergraduate admissions >", "and graduate student to the German language. While the proposed wording still contains", "German language. While the proposed wording still contains the word undergraduate, it only", "graduate students is not universal and thus not generally understood. For example, there", "[this Meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/7734), there is no difference between the two definitions. * The" ]
[ "or race in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/) for moderators' attention, or attempt an edit myself, but", "order to lead to B, or that A and B are the same.", "it's hit the non-academia SE sites and Twitter, natch). Following observations by Dan", "to apply based on their gender and / or race in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/) for", "going to flag [Is it considered normal to publish job offers inviting candidates", "I was going to flag [Is it considered normal to publish job offers", "flag [Is it considered normal to publish job offers inviting candidates to apply", "[Is it considered normal to publish job offers inviting candidates to apply based", "based on their gender and / or race in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/) for moderators' attention,", "too intrusive against the wishes of the original author? > > > Sorry", "it might be useful to sort out, rather than get overly focused on", "assumed that A will either lead to B, or has been set up", "Romik in his answer and various commenters on chat threads, I think it", "to find a point of principle or practice that it might be useful", "find a point of principle or practice that it might be useful to", "to question: Some description of circumstances A. Question(s): Why is B acceptable? Here", "the question, should users or mods instead change the question to one that", "against the wishes of the original author? > > > Sorry if this", "sites and Twitter, natch). Following observations by Dan Romik in his answer and", "an edit myself, but then I wasn't sure if I would be acting", "B, or has been set up in order to lead to B, or", "more neutral? Or is this too intrusive against the wishes of the original", "this is too nebulous: I am trying to find a point of principle", "edit myself, but then I wasn't sure if I would be acting correctly.", "Why is B acceptable? Here it seems to be assumed that A will", "for the question, should users or mods instead change the question to one", "publish job offers inviting candidates to apply based on their gender and /", "in the specific topic of that question, which seems to be contentious (and", "lead to B, or has been set up in order to lead to", "is more neutral? Or is this too intrusive against the wishes of the", "it seems to be assumed that A will either lead to B, or", "up in order to lead to B, or that A and B are", "inviting candidates to apply based on their gender and / or race in", "which seems to be contentious (and now it's hit the non-academia SE sites", "that it might be useful to sort out, rather than get overly focused", "specific topic of that question, which seems to be contentious (and now it's", "users or mods instead change the question to one that is more neutral?", "Some description of circumstances A. Question(s): Why is B acceptable? Here it seems", "happen? Preamable to question: Some description of circumstances A. Question(s): Why is B", "A. Question(s): Why is B acceptable? Here it seems to be assumed that", "Sorry if this is too nebulous: I am trying to find a point", "I would be acting correctly. I will try not to get bogged down", "their gender and / or race in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/) for moderators' attention, or attempt", "it normal/acceptable for A to happen? Preamable to question: Some description of circumstances", "than get overly focused on the rights and wrongs of a particular question.", "useful to sort out, rather than get overly focused on the rights and", "I wasn't sure if I would be acting correctly. I will try not", "and Twitter, natch). Following observations by Dan Romik in his answer and various", "/ or race in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/) for moderators' attention, or attempt an edit myself,", "My own question: instead of arguing against the apparent motivation for the question,", "but then I wasn't sure if I would be acting correctly. I will", "the specific topic of that question, which seems to be contentious (and now", "objectively true that the question has the following structure: Title: Why is it", "this too intrusive against the wishes of the original author? > > >", "sure if I would be acting correctly. I will try not to get", "> Sorry if this is too nebulous: I am trying to find a", "has been set up in order to lead to B, or that A", "question, should users or mods instead change the question to one that is", "normal to publish job offers inviting candidates to apply based on their gender", "gender and / or race in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/) for moderators' attention, or attempt an", "change the question to one that is more neutral? Or is this too", "been set up in order to lead to B, or that A and", "mods instead change the question to one that is more neutral? Or is", "true that the question has the following structure: Title: Why is it normal/acceptable", "question has the following structure: Title: Why is it normal/acceptable for A to", "Question(s): Why is B acceptable? Here it seems to be assumed that A", "and / or race in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/) for moderators' attention, or attempt an edit", "in his answer and various commenters on chat threads, I think it is", "the question has the following structure: Title: Why is it normal/acceptable for A", "observations by Dan Romik in his answer and various commenters on chat threads,", "in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/) for moderators' attention, or attempt an edit myself, but then I", "wishes of the original author? > > > Sorry if this is too", "topic of that question, which seems to be contentious (and now it's hit", "Twitter, natch). Following observations by Dan Romik in his answer and various commenters", "> > > Sorry if this is too nebulous: I am trying to", "moderators' attention, or attempt an edit myself, but then I wasn't sure if", "be useful to sort out, rather than get overly focused on the rights", "be acting correctly. I will try not to get bogged down in the", "to publish job offers inviting candidates to apply based on their gender and", "Or is this too intrusive against the wishes of the original author? >", "and various commenters on chat threads, I think it is objectively true that", "B acceptable? Here it seems to be assumed that A will either lead", "think it is objectively true that the question has the following structure: Title:", "am trying to find a point of principle or practice that it might", "> > My own question: instead of arguing against the apparent motivation for", "trying to find a point of principle or practice that it might be", "is this too intrusive against the wishes of the original author? > >", "in order to lead to B, or that A and B are the", "acceptable? Here it seems to be assumed that A will either lead to", "rather than get overly focused on the rights and wrongs of a particular", "author? > > > Sorry if this is too nebulous: I am trying", "be assumed that A will either lead to B, or has been set", "contentious (and now it's hit the non-academia SE sites and Twitter, natch). Following", "SE sites and Twitter, natch). Following observations by Dan Romik in his answer", "by Dan Romik in his answer and various commenters on chat threads, I", "the original author? > > > Sorry if this is too nebulous: I", "if this is too nebulous: I am trying to find a point of", "acting correctly. I will try not to get bogged down in the specific", "question, which seems to be contentious (and now it's hit the non-academia SE", "or mods instead change the question to one that is more neutral? Or", "various commenters on chat threads, I think it is objectively true that the", "structure: Title: Why is it normal/acceptable for A to happen? Preamable to question:", "either lead to B, or has been set up in order to lead", "instead of arguing against the apparent motivation for the question, should users or", "circumstances A. Question(s): Why is B acceptable? Here it seems to be assumed", "> > Sorry if this is too nebulous: I am trying to find", "was going to flag [Is it considered normal to publish job offers inviting", "threads, I think it is objectively true that the question has the following", "point of principle or practice that it might be useful to sort out,", "or has been set up in order to lead to B, or that", "> My own question: instead of arguing against the apparent motivation for the", "principle or practice that it might be useful to sort out, rather than", "hit the non-academia SE sites and Twitter, natch). Following observations by Dan Romik", "I think it is objectively true that the question has the following structure:", "to get bogged down in the specific topic of that question, which seems", "a point of principle or practice that it might be useful to sort", "his answer and various commenters on chat threads, I think it is objectively", "will either lead to B, or has been set up in order to", "that is more neutral? Or is this too intrusive against the wishes of", "practice that it might be useful to sort out, rather than get overly", "non-academia SE sites and Twitter, natch). Following observations by Dan Romik in his", "race in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/) for moderators' attention, or attempt an edit myself, but then", "considered normal to publish job offers inviting candidates to apply based on their", "or attempt an edit myself, but then I wasn't sure if I would", "A will either lead to B, or has been set up in order", "to lead to B, or that A and B are the same. >", "commenters on chat threads, I think it is objectively true that the question", "now it's hit the non-academia SE sites and Twitter, natch). Following observations by", "to B, or that A and B are the same. > > My", "the same. > > My own question: instead of arguing against the apparent", "that A and B are the same. > > My own question: instead", "attention, or attempt an edit myself, but then I wasn't sure if I", "be contentious (and now it's hit the non-academia SE sites and Twitter, natch).", "to happen? Preamable to question: Some description of circumstances A. Question(s): Why is", "out, rather than get overly focused on the rights and wrongs of a", "of arguing against the apparent motivation for the question, should users or mods", "it considered normal to publish job offers inviting candidates to apply based on", "set up in order to lead to B, or that A and B", "of that question, which seems to be contentious (and now it's hit the", "down in the specific topic of that question, which seems to be contentious", "that A will either lead to B, or has been set up in", "it is objectively true that the question has the following structure: Title: Why", "question: Some description of circumstances A. Question(s): Why is B acceptable? Here it", "to flag [Is it considered normal to publish job offers inviting candidates to", "apply based on their gender and / or race in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/) for moderators'", "for moderators' attention, or attempt an edit myself, but then I wasn't sure", "then I wasn't sure if I would be acting correctly. I will try", "one that is more neutral? Or is this too intrusive against the wishes", "to one that is more neutral? Or is this too intrusive against the", "arguing against the apparent motivation for the question, should users or mods instead", "on chat threads, I think it is objectively true that the question has", "has the following structure: Title: Why is it normal/acceptable for A to happen?", "(and now it's hit the non-academia SE sites and Twitter, natch). Following observations", "B are the same. > > My own question: instead of arguing against", "answer and various commenters on chat threads, I think it is objectively true", "too nebulous: I am trying to find a point of principle or practice", "same. > > My own question: instead of arguing against the apparent motivation", "of the original author? > > > Sorry if this is too nebulous:", "chat threads, I think it is objectively true that the question has the", "is B acceptable? Here it seems to be assumed that A will either", "nebulous: I am trying to find a point of principle or practice that", "Here it seems to be assumed that A will either lead to B,", "neutral? Or is this too intrusive against the wishes of the original author?", "attempt an edit myself, but then I wasn't sure if I would be", "Dan Romik in his answer and various commenters on chat threads, I think", "the wishes of the original author? > > > Sorry if this is", "for A to happen? Preamable to question: Some description of circumstances A. Question(s):", "B, or that A and B are the same. > > My own", "job offers inviting candidates to apply based on their gender and / or", "seems to be assumed that A will either lead to B, or has", "Why is it normal/acceptable for A to happen? Preamable to question: Some description", "intrusive against the wishes of the original author? > > > Sorry if", "wasn't sure if I would be acting correctly. I will try not to", "sort out, rather than get overly focused on the rights and wrongs of", "instead change the question to one that is more neutral? Or is this", "question: instead of arguing against the apparent motivation for the question, should users", "if I would be acting correctly. I will try not to get bogged", "to be contentious (and now it's hit the non-academia SE sites and Twitter,", "of principle or practice that it might be useful to sort out, rather", "on their gender and / or race in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/) for moderators' attention, or", "or practice that it might be useful to sort out, rather than get", "is it normal/acceptable for A to happen? Preamable to question: Some description of", "following structure: Title: Why is it normal/acceptable for A to happen? Preamable to", "normal/acceptable for A to happen? Preamable to question: Some description of circumstances A.", "to be assumed that A will either lead to B, or has been", "lead to B, or that A and B are the same. > >", "against the apparent motivation for the question, should users or mods instead change", "to sort out, rather than get overly focused on the rights and wrongs", "Preamable to question: Some description of circumstances A. Question(s): Why is B acceptable?", "A to happen? Preamable to question: Some description of circumstances A. Question(s): Why", "myself, but then I wasn't sure if I would be acting correctly. I", "Title: Why is it normal/acceptable for A to happen? Preamable to question: Some", "question to one that is more neutral? Or is this too intrusive against", "of circumstances A. Question(s): Why is B acceptable? Here it seems to be", "get bogged down in the specific topic of that question, which seems to", "not to get bogged down in the specific topic of that question, which", "natch). Following observations by Dan Romik in his answer and various commenters on", "bogged down in the specific topic of that question, which seems to be", "candidates to apply based on their gender and / or race in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/)", "is too nebulous: I am trying to find a point of principle or", "or that A and B are the same. > > My own question:", "Following observations by Dan Romik in his answer and various commenters on chat", "might be useful to sort out, rather than get overly focused on the", "the following structure: Title: Why is it normal/acceptable for A to happen? Preamable", "apparent motivation for the question, should users or mods instead change the question", "is objectively true that the question has the following structure: Title: Why is", "the apparent motivation for the question, should users or mods instead change the", "motivation for the question, should users or mods instead change the question to", "to B, or has been set up in order to lead to B,", "would be acting correctly. I will try not to get bogged down in", "the question to one that is more neutral? Or is this too intrusive", "I am trying to find a point of principle or practice that it", "description of circumstances A. Question(s): Why is B acceptable? Here it seems to", "and B are the same. > > My own question: instead of arguing", "will try not to get bogged down in the specific topic of that", "academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/95011/) for moderators' attention, or attempt an edit myself, but then I wasn't", "try not to get bogged down in the specific topic of that question,", "A and B are the same. > > My own question: instead of", "original author? > > > Sorry if this is too nebulous: I am", "correctly. I will try not to get bogged down in the specific topic", "I will try not to get bogged down in the specific topic of", "seems to be contentious (and now it's hit the non-academia SE sites and", "that the question has the following structure: Title: Why is it normal/acceptable for", "are the same. > > My own question: instead of arguing against the", "own question: instead of arguing against the apparent motivation for the question, should", "should users or mods instead change the question to one that is more", "offers inviting candidates to apply based on their gender and / or race", "that question, which seems to be contentious (and now it's hit the non-academia", "the non-academia SE sites and Twitter, natch). Following observations by Dan Romik in" ]
[ "have been raised [on this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/95065/929) that suggests that the OP's example title", "more appropriate way. The OP has rolled my revision back. Which way do", "this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/95065/929) that suggests that the OP's example title is not appropriate. I", "raised [on this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/95065/929) that suggests that the OP's example title is not", "way. The OP has rolled my revision back. Which way do we want", "I have edited the title which I think conveys the same information, but", "title which I think conveys the same information, but in a more appropriate", "think conveys the same information, but in a more appropriate way. The OP", "that suggests that the OP's example title is not appropriate. I have edited", "the title which I think conveys the same information, but in a more", "suggests that the OP's example title is not appropriate. I have edited the", "appropriate. I have edited the title which I think conveys the same information,", "in a more appropriate way. The OP has rolled my revision back. Which", "OP has rolled my revision back. Which way do we want the answer?", "The OP has rolled my revision back. Which way do we want the", "OP's example title is not appropriate. I have edited the title which I", "appropriate way. The OP has rolled my revision back. Which way do we", "I think conveys the same information, but in a more appropriate way. The", "conveys the same information, but in a more appropriate way. The OP has", "not appropriate. I have edited the title which I think conveys the same", "title is not appropriate. I have edited the title which I think conveys", "a more appropriate way. The OP has rolled my revision back. Which way", "of flags have been raised [on this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/95065/929) that suggests that the OP's", "same information, but in a more appropriate way. The OP has rolled my", "information, but in a more appropriate way. The OP has rolled my revision", "the OP's example title is not appropriate. I have edited the title which", "A couple of flags have been raised [on this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/95065/929) that suggests that", "couple of flags have been raised [on this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/95065/929) that suggests that the", "edited the title which I think conveys the same information, but in a", "been raised [on this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/95065/929) that suggests that the OP's example title is", "which I think conveys the same information, but in a more appropriate way.", "but in a more appropriate way. The OP has rolled my revision back.", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/95065/929) that suggests that the OP's example title is not appropriate. I have", "example title is not appropriate. I have edited the title which I think", "the same information, but in a more appropriate way. The OP has rolled", "is not appropriate. I have edited the title which I think conveys the", "have edited the title which I think conveys the same information, but in", "flags have been raised [on this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/95065/929) that suggests that the OP's example", "[on this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/95065/929) that suggests that the OP's example title is not appropriate.", "that the OP's example title is not appropriate. I have edited the title" ]
[ "the modus operandi of a typical student: complaining and criticizing lecturers. I wouldn't", "seems that many users consider students (students as a group, not individuals) to", "common rookie mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639) > > > 18 votes so far * > >", "think too much of this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475) > > > 21 votes As a former", "irrational \\\\\\holes: > > [students cannot reasonably expect - I see you're", "so far * > > [@PsySp, you seem to be too much concerned", "This is the modus operandi of a typical student: complaining and criticizing lecturers.", "of a typical student: complaining and criticizing lecturers. I wouldn't think too much", "a typical student: complaining and criticizing lecturers. I wouldn't think too much of", "student I feel this is user hostile behaviour, by a more powerful group", "gripe session in the pub than in a friendly public forum. As a", "group and see how quickly that gets flagged and removed. I'm not sure", "> [@PsySp, you seem to be too much concerned with this student. Students", "add anything positive or useful to the discussion and 2. could discourage some", "expect* - I see you're applying logic to an illogical group, a common", "seems this kind of behaviour 1. doesn't add anything positive or useful to", "not sure where this is going. Are these comments not considered rude? Is", "Is there a huge amount of popular lecturer-bashing which has passed me by?", "popular comments on this site it seems that many users consider students (students", "this is user hostile behaviour, by a more powerful group towards a less", "a former student I feel this is user hostile behaviour, by a more", "student. Students are free to hate and bad mouth their lecturers. This is", "a gripe session in the pub than in a friendly public forum. As", "this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475) > > > 21 votes As a former student I feel this", "thin-skinned, but it seems this kind of behaviour 1. doesn't add anything positive", "> [students cannot reasonably expect - I see you're applying logic to an", "gets flagged and removed. I'm not sure where this is going. Are these", "> > [students cannot reasonably expect - I see you're applying logic to", "these comments to basically any minority or disadvantaged group and see how quickly", "consider students (students as a group, not individuals) to be irrational \\\\\\holes: ", "not considered rude? Is there a huge amount of popular lecturer-bashing which has", "mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639) > > > 18 votes so far * > > [@PsySp, you", "a less powerful group, more suitable at a gripe session in the pub", "this too thin-skinned, but it seems this kind of behaviour 1. doesn't add", "reading some popular comments on this site it seems that many users consider", "pub than in a friendly public forum. As a thought experiment, try applying", "this kind of behaviour 1. doesn't add anything positive or useful to the", "it seems that many users consider students (students as a group, not individuals)", "minority or disadvantaged group and see how quickly that gets flagged and removed.", "see how quickly that gets flagged and removed. I'm not sure where this", "much concerned with this student. Students are free to hate and bad mouth", "friendly public forum. As a thought experiment, try applying these comments to basically", "1. doesn't add anything positive or useful to the discussion and 2. could", "After reading some popular comments on this site it seems that many users", "or disadvantaged group and see how quickly that gets flagged and removed. I'm", "kind of behaviour 1. doesn't add anything positive or useful to the discussion", "try applying these comments to basically any minority or disadvantaged group and see", "a huge amount of popular lecturer-bashing which has passed me by? Obviously some", "too much of this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475) > > > 21 votes As a former student", "is user hostile behaviour, by a more powerful group towards a less powerful", "as a group, not individuals) to be irrational \\\\\\holes: > > [students", " > > [@PsySp, you seem to be too much concerned with this", "far * > > [@PsySp, you seem to be too much concerned with", "applying these comments to basically any minority or disadvantaged group and see how", "forum. As a thought experiment, try applying these comments to basically any minority", "comments to basically any minority or disadvantaged group and see how quickly that", "group, not individuals) to be irrational \\\\\\holes: > > [students cannot reasonably", "comments on this site it seems that many users consider students (students as", "sure where this is going. Are these comments not considered rude? Is there", "to be too much concerned with this student. Students are free to hate", "Students are free to hate and bad mouth their lecturers. This is the", "hate and bad mouth their lecturers. This is the modus operandi of a", "illogical group, a common rookie mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639) > > > 18 votes so far", "with this student. Students are free to hate and bad mouth their lecturers.", "group, more suitable at a gripe session in the pub than in a", "which has passed me by? Obviously some part of the community will consider", "is going. Are these comments not considered rude? Is there a huge amount", "group, a common rookie mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639) > > > 18 votes so far ", "a friendly public forum. As a thought experiment, try applying these comments to", "are free to hate and bad mouth their lecturers. This is the modus", "these comments not considered rude? Is there a huge amount of popular lecturer-bashing", "> > > 21 votes As a former student I feel this is", "will consider this too thin-skinned, but it seems this kind of behaviour 1.", "that gets flagged and removed. I'm not sure where this is going. Are", "I feel this is user hostile behaviour, by a more powerful group towards", "[students cannot reasonably expect - I see you're applying logic to an illogical", "> > > 18 votes so far * > > [@PsySp, you seem", "passed me by? Obviously some part of the community will consider this too", "logic to an illogical group, a common rookie mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639) > > > 18", "[@PsySp, you seem to be too much concerned with this student. Students are", "popular lecturer-bashing which has passed me by? Obviously some part of the community", "session in the pub than in a friendly public forum. As a thought", "> 18 votes so far * > > [@PsySp, you seem to be", "Are these comments not considered rude? Is there a huge amount of popular", "many users consider students (students as a group, not individuals) to be irrational", "I see you're applying logic to an illogical group, a common rookie mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639)", "> > 21 votes As a former student I feel this is user", "21 votes As a former student I feel this is user hostile behaviour,", "where this is going. Are these comments not considered rude? Is there a", "much of this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475) > > > 21 votes As a former student I", "cannot reasonably expect* - I see you're applying logic to an illogical group,", "a common rookie mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639) > > > 18 votes so far * >", "rude? Is there a huge amount of popular lecturer-bashing which has passed me", "feel this is user hostile behaviour, by a more powerful group towards a", "lecturers. I wouldn't think too much of this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475) > > > 21 votes", "a thought experiment, try applying these comments to basically any minority or disadvantaged", "some popular comments on this site it seems that many users consider students", "is the modus operandi of a typical student: complaining and criticizing lecturers. I", "powerful group, more suitable at a gripe session in the pub than in", "going. Are these comments not considered rude? Is there a huge amount of", "and removed. I'm not sure where this is going. Are these comments not", "(students as a group, not individuals) to be irrational \\\\\\holes: > >", "be too much concerned with this student. Students are free to hate and", "of this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475) > > > 21 votes As a former student I feel", "of popular lecturer-bashing which has passed me by? Obviously some part of the", "more suitable at a gripe session in the pub than in a friendly", "- I see you're applying logic to an illogical group, a common rookie", "to an illogical group, a common rookie mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639) > > > 18 votes", "behaviour, by a more powerful group towards a less powerful group, more suitable", "than in a friendly public forum. As a thought experiment, try applying these", "by? Obviously some part of the community will consider this too thin-skinned, but", "operandi of a typical student: complaining and criticizing lecturers. I wouldn't think too", "to basically any minority or disadvantaged group and see how quickly that gets", "that many users consider students (students as a group, not individuals) to be", "you seem to be too much concerned with this student. Students are free", "votes As a former student I feel this is user hostile behaviour, by", "see you're applying logic to an illogical group, a common rookie mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639) >", "As a former student I feel this is user hostile behaviour, by a", "the pub than in a friendly public forum. As a thought experiment, try", "this is going. Are these comments not considered rude? Is there a huge", "mouth their lecturers. This is the modus operandi of a typical student: complaining", "group towards a less powerful group, more suitable at a gripe session in", "there a huge amount of popular lecturer-bashing which has passed me by? Obviously", "modus operandi of a typical student: complaining and criticizing lecturers. I wouldn't think", "flagged and removed. I'm not sure where this is going. Are these comments", "I'm not sure where this is going. Are these comments not considered rude?", "Obviously some part of the community will consider this too thin-skinned, but it", "or useful to the discussion and 2. could discourage some users from participating.", "amount of popular lecturer-bashing which has passed me by? Obviously some part of", "suitable at a gripe session in the pub than in a friendly public", "by a more powerful group towards a less powerful group, more suitable at", "considered rude? Is there a huge amount of popular lecturer-bashing which has passed", "has passed me by? Obviously some part of the community will consider this", "rookie mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639) > > > 18 votes so far * > > [@PsySp,", "hostile behaviour, by a more powerful group towards a less powerful group, more", "individuals) to be irrational \\\\\\holes: > > [students cannot reasonably expect -", "it seems this kind of behaviour 1. doesn't add anything positive or useful", "not individuals) to be irrational \\\\\\holes: > > [students cannot reasonably expect", "me by? Obviously some part of the community will consider this too thin-skinned,", "doesn't add anything positive or useful to the discussion and 2. could discourage", "more powerful group towards a less powerful group, more suitable at a gripe", "lecturers. This is the modus operandi of a typical student: complaining and criticizing", "at a gripe session in the pub than in a friendly public forum.", "behaviour 1. doesn't add anything positive or useful to the discussion and 2.", "the community will consider this too thin-skinned, but it seems this kind of", "an illogical group, a common rookie mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639) > > > 18 votes so", "in the pub than in a friendly public forum. As a thought experiment,", "but it seems this kind of behaviour 1. doesn't add anything positive or", "this site it seems that many users consider students (students as a group,", "students (students as a group, not individuals) to be irrational \\\\\\holes: >", "* > > [students cannot reasonably expect - I see you're applying logic", "quickly that gets flagged and removed. I'm not sure where this is going.", "huge amount of popular lecturer-bashing which has passed me by? Obviously some part", "a group, not individuals) to be irrational \\\\\\holes: > > [students cannot", "wouldn't think too much of this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475) > > > 21 votes As a", "consider this too thin-skinned, but it seems this kind of behaviour 1. doesn't", "former student I feel this is user hostile behaviour, by a more powerful", "site it seems that many users consider students (students as a group, not", "basically any minority or disadvantaged group and see how quickly that gets flagged", "a more powerful group towards a less powerful group, more suitable at a", "applying logic to an illogical group, a common rookie mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639) > > >", "criticizing lecturers. I wouldn't think too much of this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475) > > > 21", "> 21 votes As a former student I feel this is user hostile", "As a thought experiment, try applying these comments to basically any minority or", "votes so far > > [@PsySp, you seem to be too much", "some part of the community will consider this too thin-skinned, but it seems", "removed. I'm not sure where this is going. Are these comments not considered", "anything positive or useful to the discussion and 2. could discourage some users", "their lecturers. This is the modus operandi of a typical student: complaining and", "users consider students (students as a group, not individuals) to be irrational \\\\\\holes:", "you're applying logic to an illogical group, a common rookie mistake.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96638/how-do-i-politely-decline-student-requests-to-meet-during-my-research-time#comment248631_96639) > >", "> > [@PsySp, you seem to be too much concerned with this student.", "too thin-skinned, but it seems this kind of behaviour 1. doesn't add anything", "public forum. As a thought experiment, try applying these comments to basically any", "how quickly that gets flagged and removed. I'm not sure where this is", "bad mouth their lecturers. This is the modus operandi of a typical student:", "reasonably expect - I see you're applying logic to an illogical group, a", "comments not considered rude? Is there a huge amount of popular lecturer-bashing which", "in a friendly public forum. As a thought experiment, try applying these comments", "powerful group towards a less powerful group, more suitable at a gripe session", "seem to be too much concerned with this student. Students are free to", "towards a less powerful group, more suitable at a gripe session in the", "and see how quickly that gets flagged and removed. I'm not sure where", "any minority or disadvantaged group and see how quickly that gets flagged and", "to be irrational \\\\\\holes: > > [students cannot reasonably expect - I", "concerned with this student. Students are free to hate and bad mouth their", "and bad mouth their lecturers. This is the modus operandi of a typical", "I wouldn't think too much of this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475) > > > 21 votes As", "18 votes so far * > > [@PsySp, you seem to be too", "part of the community will consider this too thin-skinned, but it seems this", "lecturer-bashing which has passed me by? Obviously some part of the community will", "complaining and criticizing lecturers. I wouldn't think too much of this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475) > >", "on this site it seems that many users consider students (students as a", "too much concerned with this student. Students are free to hate and bad", "disadvantaged group and see how quickly that gets flagged and removed. I'm not", "of behaviour 1. doesn't add anything positive or useful to the discussion and", "> > 18 votes so far * > > [@PsySp, you seem to", "positive or useful to the discussion and 2. could discourage some users from", "typical student: complaining and criticizing lecturers. I wouldn't think too much of this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475)", "of the community will consider this too thin-skinned, but it seems this kind", "and criticizing lecturers. I wouldn't think too much of this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475) > > >", "experiment, try applying these comments to basically any minority or disadvantaged group and", "\\\\\\holes: > > [students cannot reasonably expect - I see you're applying", "student: complaining and criticizing lecturers. I wouldn't think too much of this.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96470/how-to-deal-with-arrogant-e-mail-of-a-student/96475#comment247954_96475) >", "to hate and bad mouth their lecturers. This is the modus operandi of", "less powerful group, more suitable at a gripe session in the pub than", "free to hate and bad mouth their lecturers. This is the modus operandi", "thought experiment, try applying these comments to basically any minority or disadvantaged group", "be irrational \\\\\\holes: > > [students cannot reasonably expect - I see", "this student. Students are free to hate and bad mouth their lecturers. This", "user hostile behaviour, by a more powerful group towards a less powerful group,", "community will consider this too thin-skinned, but it seems this kind of behaviour" ]
[ "(I tried to give it a shot, but I would love if others", "question does not follow the pattern of \"here is a bunch of facts", "with very little answerable questions. Is the postdoc priorities question really qualitatively different", "for worse. Yes, it is somewhat opinion-based. Yes, it is a little broad.", "I think it is important, well within our usual range, and actually fairly", "Academia.SE question, for better or for worse. Yes, it is somewhat opinion-based. Yes,", "The question lists a few conflicting advises that are generally given, and asks", "would love if others could answer as well). If we start being that", "answerable questions. Is the postdoc priorities question really qualitatively different than [this recent", "Is the postdoc priorities question really qualitatively different than [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97008/choosing-ones-best-papers-for-job-applications), or", "is the standard format of questions we usually close as based on individual", "on individual factors. Other commenters have argued that \"Too Broad\" and \"Opinion Based\"", "to do\", which is the standard format of questions we usually close as", "being honest, I don't see it. The question lists a few conflicting advises", "for better or for worse. Yes, it is somewhat opinion-based. Yes, it is", "Yes, it is somewhat opinion-based. Yes, it is a little broad. But I", "factors. Other commenters have argued that \"Too Broad\" and \"Opinion Based\" could also", "I don't see it. The question lists a few conflicting advises that are", "answer as well). If we start being that strict about opinion-based and broad,", "now tell me what to do\", which is the standard format of questions", "is important, well within our usual range, and actually fairly answerable (I tried", "don't see it. The question lists a few conflicting advises that are generally", "standard format of questions we usually close as based on individual factors. To", "not follow the pattern of \"here is a bunch of facts about me,", "based on individual factors. To me, this is a typical Academia.SE question, for", "a little broad. But I think it is important, well within our usual", "that \"Too Broad\" and \"Opinion Based\" could also apply. If I am being", "broad, I am afraid we will end up with very little answerable questions.", "given, and asks for a strategy how one generally selects between them. Notably,", "very little answerable questions. Is the postdoc priorities question really qualitatively different than", "apply. If I am being honest, I don't see it. The question lists", "tried to give it a shot, but I would love if others could", "answerable (I tried to give it a shot, but I would love if", "being that strict about opinion-based and broad, I am afraid we will end", "questions. Is the postdoc priorities question really qualitatively different than [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97008/choosing-ones-best-papers-for-job-applications),", "depends strongly on individual factors. Other commenters have argued that \"Too Broad\" and", "is somewhat opinion-based. Yes, it is a little broad. But I think it", "broad. But I think it is important, well within our usual range, and", "generally given, and asks for a strategy how one generally selects between them.", "I am being honest, I don't see it. The question lists a few", "If I am being honest, I don't see it. The question lists a", "to give it a shot, but I would love if others could answer", "love if others could answer as well). If we start being that strict", "am afraid we will end up with very little answerable questions. Is the", "it a shot, but I would love if others could answer as well).", "factors. To me, this is a typical Academia.SE question, for better or for", "strict about opinion-based and broad, I am afraid we will end up with", "opinion-based. Yes, it is a little broad. But I think it is important,", "generally selects between them. Notably, the question does not follow the pattern of", "our usual range, and actually fairly answerable (I tried to give it a", "that the question depends strongly on individual factors. Other commenters have argued that", "me, now tell me what to do\", which is the standard format of", "for a strategy how one generally selects between them. Notably, the question does", "does not follow the pattern of \"here is a bunch of facts about", "trumps all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all) on hold. The given reason was that the question depends strongly", "give it a shot, but I would love if others could answer as", "conflicting advises that are generally given, and asks for a strategy how one", "on individual factors. To me, this is a typical Academia.SE question, for better", "Notably, the question does not follow the pattern of \"here is a bunch", "about me, now tell me what to do\", which is the standard format", "this is a typical Academia.SE question, for better or for worse. Yes, it", "see it. The question lists a few conflicting advises that are generally given,", "\"here is a bunch of facts about me, now tell me what to", "argued that \"Too Broad\" and \"Opinion Based\" could also apply. If I am", "what to do\", which is the standard format of questions we usually close", "given reason was that the question depends strongly on individual factors. Other commenters", "and actually fairly answerable (I tried to give it a shot, but I", "worse. Yes, it is somewhat opinion-based. Yes, it is a little broad. But", "a typical Academia.SE question, for better or for worse. Yes, it is somewhat", "question, for better or for worse. Yes, it is somewhat opinion-based. Yes, it", "individual factors. Other commenters have argued that \"Too Broad\" and \"Opinion Based\" could", "about opinion-based and broad, I am afraid we will end up with very", "end up with very little answerable questions. Is the postdoc priorities question really", "few conflicting advises that are generally given, and asks for a strategy how", "as well). If we start being that strict about opinion-based and broad, I", "will end up with very little answerable questions. Is the postdoc priorities question", "[Post-doc priorities: “Laundry list” vs. “Research trumps all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all) on hold. The given reason", "of facts about me, now tell me what to do\", which is the", "postdoc priorities question really qualitatively different than [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97008/choosing-ones-best-papers-for-job-applications), or [that recent", "we will end up with very little answerable questions. Is the postdoc priorities", "questions we usually close as based on individual factors. To me, this is", "The community has recently put the question [Post-doc priorities: “Laundry list” vs. “Research", "within our usual range, and actually fairly answerable (I tried to give it", "of \"here is a bunch of facts about me, now tell me what", "do\", which is the standard format of questions we usually close as based", "Yes, it is a little broad. But I think it is important, well", "shot, but I would love if others could answer as well). If we", "is a bunch of facts about me, now tell me what to do\",", "\"Opinion Based\" could also apply. If I am being honest, I don't see", "a bunch of facts about me, now tell me what to do\", which", "pattern of \"here is a bunch of facts about me, now tell me", "community has recently put the question [Post-doc priorities: “Laundry list” vs. “Research trumps", "close as based on individual factors. To me, this is a typical Academia.SE", "the postdoc priorities question really qualitatively different than [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97008/choosing-ones-best-papers-for-job-applications), or [that", "afraid we will end up with very little answerable questions. Is the postdoc", "the question [Post-doc priorities: “Laundry list” vs. “Research trumps all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all) on hold. The", "really qualitatively different than [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97008/choosing-ones-best-papers-for-job-applications), or [that recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97003/how-would-a-graduate-admissions-committee-view-possibly-false-accusations-agai), or the", "The given reason was that the question depends strongly on individual factors. Other", "and \"Opinion Based\" could also apply. If I am being honest, I don't", "question really qualitatively different than [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97008/choosing-ones-best-papers-for-job-applications), or [that recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97003/how-would-a-graduate-admissions-committee-view-possibly-false-accusations-agai), or", "is a little broad. But I think it is important, well within our", "If we start being that strict about opinion-based and broad, I am afraid", "that are generally given, and asks for a strategy how one generally selects", "commenters have argued that \"Too Broad\" and \"Opinion Based\" could also apply. If", "of questions we usually close as based on individual factors. To me, this", "strongly on individual factors. Other commenters have argued that \"Too Broad\" and \"Opinion", "fairly answerable (I tried to give it a shot, but I would love", "start being that strict about opinion-based and broad, I am afraid we will", "better or for worse. Yes, it is somewhat opinion-based. Yes, it is a", "one generally selects between them. Notably, the question does not follow the pattern", "it is a little broad. But I think it is important, well within", "was that the question depends strongly on individual factors. Other commenters have argued", "also apply. If I am being honest, I don't see it. The question", "follow the pattern of \"here is a bunch of facts about me, now", "a strategy how one generally selects between them. Notably, the question does not", "list” vs. “Research trumps all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all) on hold. The given reason was that the", "question [Post-doc priorities: “Laundry list” vs. “Research trumps all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all) on hold. The given", "“Research trumps all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all) on hold. The given reason was that the question depends", "selects between them. Notably, the question does not follow the pattern of \"here", "as based on individual factors. To me, this is a typical Academia.SE question,", "and asks for a strategy how one generally selects between them. Notably, the", "facts about me, now tell me what to do\", which is the standard", "have argued that \"Too Broad\" and \"Opinion Based\" could also apply. If I", "somewhat opinion-based. Yes, it is a little broad. But I think it is", "think it is important, well within our usual range, and actually fairly answerable", "bunch of facts about me, now tell me what to do\", which is", "on hold. The given reason was that the question depends strongly on individual", "we usually close as based on individual factors. To me, this is a", "could also apply. If I am being honest, I don't see it. The", "tell me what to do\", which is the standard format of questions we", "Based\" could also apply. If I am being honest, I don't see it.", "it. The question lists a few conflicting advises that are generally given, and", "all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all) on hold. The given reason was that the question depends strongly on", "But I think it is important, well within our usual range, and actually", "me, this is a typical Academia.SE question, for better or for worse. Yes,", "usual range, and actually fairly answerable (I tried to give it a shot,", "or for worse. Yes, it is somewhat opinion-based. Yes, it is a little", "put the question [Post-doc priorities: “Laundry list” vs. “Research trumps all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all) on hold.", "\"Too Broad\" and \"Opinion Based\" could also apply. If I am being honest,", "opinion-based and broad, I am afraid we will end up with very little", "up with very little answerable questions. Is the postdoc priorities question really qualitatively", "than [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97008/choosing-ones-best-papers-for-job-applications), or [that recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97003/how-would-a-graduate-admissions-committee-view-possibly-false-accusations-agai), or the [following recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96987/should-i-avoid-local-journals)?", "question lists a few conflicting advises that are generally given, and asks for", "I would love if others could answer as well). If we start being", "me what to do\", which is the standard format of questions we usually", "the question does not follow the pattern of \"here is a bunch of", "the question depends strongly on individual factors. Other commenters have argued that \"Too", "lists a few conflicting advises that are generally given, and asks for a", "a shot, but I would love if others could answer as well). If", "Other commenters have argued that \"Too Broad\" and \"Opinion Based\" could also apply.", "question depends strongly on individual factors. Other commenters have argued that \"Too Broad\"", "and broad, I am afraid we will end up with very little answerable", "priorities: “Laundry list” vs. “Research trumps all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all) on hold. The given reason was", "strategy how one generally selects between them. Notably, the question does not follow", "between them. Notably, the question does not follow the pattern of \"here is", "a few conflicting advises that are generally given, and asks for a strategy", "qualitatively different than [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97008/choosing-ones-best-papers-for-job-applications), or [that recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97003/how-would-a-graduate-admissions-committee-view-possibly-false-accusations-agai), or the [following", "important, well within our usual range, and actually fairly answerable (I tried to", "actually fairly answerable (I tried to give it a shot, but I would", "different than [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97008/choosing-ones-best-papers-for-job-applications), or [that recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97003/how-would-a-graduate-admissions-committee-view-possibly-false-accusations-agai), or the [following recent", "format of questions we usually close as based on individual factors. To me,", "the standard format of questions we usually close as based on individual factors.", "but I would love if others could answer as well). If we start", "am being honest, I don't see it. The question lists a few conflicting", "which is the standard format of questions we usually close as based on", "vs. “Research trumps all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all) on hold. The given reason was that the question", "are generally given, and asks for a strategy how one generally selects between", "typical Academia.SE question, for better or for worse. Yes, it is somewhat opinion-based.", "recently put the question [Post-doc priorities: “Laundry list” vs. “Research trumps all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all) on", "it is somewhat opinion-based. Yes, it is a little broad. But I think", "little broad. But I think it is important, well within our usual range,", "range, and actually fairly answerable (I tried to give it a shot, but", "little answerable questions. Is the postdoc priorities question really qualitatively different than [this", "Broad\" and \"Opinion Based\" could also apply. If I am being honest, I", "honest, I don't see it. The question lists a few conflicting advises that", "is a typical Academia.SE question, for better or for worse. Yes, it is", "that strict about opinion-based and broad, I am afraid we will end up", "it is important, well within our usual range, and actually fairly answerable (I", "well). If we start being that strict about opinion-based and broad, I am", "hold. The given reason was that the question depends strongly on individual factors.", "could answer as well). If we start being that strict about opinion-based and", "“Laundry list” vs. “Research trumps all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all) on hold. The given reason was that", "usually close as based on individual factors. To me, this is a typical", "reason was that the question depends strongly on individual factors. Other commenters have", "well within our usual range, and actually fairly answerable (I tried to give", "we start being that strict about opinion-based and broad, I am afraid we", "individual factors. To me, this is a typical Academia.SE question, for better or", "others could answer as well). If we start being that strict about opinion-based", "if others could answer as well). If we start being that strict about", "I am afraid we will end up with very little answerable questions. Is", "priorities question really qualitatively different than [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97008/choosing-ones-best-papers-for-job-applications), or [that recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97003/how-would-a-graduate-admissions-committee-view-possibly-false-accusations-agai),", "has recently put the question [Post-doc priorities: “Laundry list” vs. “Research trumps all”](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/96998/post-doc-priorities-laundry-list-vs-research-trumps-all)", "them. Notably, the question does not follow the pattern of \"here is a", "To me, this is a typical Academia.SE question, for better or for worse.", "advises that are generally given, and asks for a strategy how one generally", "the pattern of \"here is a bunch of facts about me, now tell", "asks for a strategy how one generally selects between them. Notably, the question", "how one generally selects between them. Notably, the question does not follow the" ]
[ "wondered if I was in the right to delete my question given its", "to delete my question given its duplicate nature. Should people who realize that", "delete my question given its duplicate nature. Should people who realize that their", "if I was in the right to delete my question given its duplicate", "my question given its duplicate nature. Should people who realize that their questions", "nature. Should people who realize that their questions are duplicates delete their questions?", "recently posted a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97792/how-precise-should-data-methodology-be) on methodologies and data reproducibility. After finding my answers,", "question given its duplicate nature. Should people who realize that their questions are", "its duplicate nature. Should people who realize that their questions are duplicates delete", "methodologies and data reproducibility. After finding my answers, I wondered if I was", "was in the right to delete my question given its duplicate nature. Should", "I recently posted a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97792/how-precise-should-data-methodology-be) on methodologies and data reproducibility. After finding my", "reproducibility. After finding my answers, I wondered if I was in the right", "posted a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97792/how-precise-should-data-methodology-be) on methodologies and data reproducibility. After finding my answers, I", "data reproducibility. After finding my answers, I wondered if I was in the", "on methodologies and data reproducibility. After finding my answers, I wondered if I", "my answers, I wondered if I was in the right to delete my", "in the right to delete my question given its duplicate nature. Should people", "[question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97792/how-precise-should-data-methodology-be) on methodologies and data reproducibility. After finding my answers, I wondered if", "and data reproducibility. After finding my answers, I wondered if I was in", "I was in the right to delete my question given its duplicate nature.", "finding my answers, I wondered if I was in the right to delete", "given its duplicate nature. Should people who realize that their questions are duplicates", "the right to delete my question given its duplicate nature. Should people who", "a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97792/how-precise-should-data-methodology-be) on methodologies and data reproducibility. After finding my answers, I wondered", "After finding my answers, I wondered if I was in the right to", "answers, I wondered if I was in the right to delete my question", "right to delete my question given its duplicate nature. Should people who realize", "I wondered if I was in the right to delete my question given", "duplicate nature. **Should people who realize that their questions are duplicates delete their" ]
[ "that a general answer exists --- maybe all these questions have peculiarities that", "turning down alternative offers safely and timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely), [Tenure-track offer with other applications in", "older examples are [Is it OK to turn down a postdoc offer (contract", "offers safely and timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely), [Tenure-track offer with other applications in progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/) . This", "(I am not asking this because I wish to write myself the canonical", "it is appropriate to leave a (phd, postdoc, tenure-track...) position they have accepted", "[Swap Postdoc position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position) . Other older examples are [Is it OK to turn", "and timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely), [Tenure-track offer with other applications in progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/) . This would suggest", "progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/) . This would suggest to write a \"canonical question\" on the subject.", "a postdoc offer (contract not signed yet) after getting a better postdoc offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1),", "multiple positions have incompatible deadlines. The last example is [Swap Postdoc position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position) .", "[Postdoc positions: turning down alternative offers safely and timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely), [Tenure-track offer with other", "asking this because I wish to write myself the canonical question and answer", "with other applications in progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/) . This would suggest to write a \"canonical", "be answered on an individual basis. What do you think about it? (I", "is [Swap Postdoc position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position) . Other older examples are [Is it OK to", "one that became available later, or in any case how to behave when", "answer exists --- maybe all these questions have peculiarities that require them to", "it? (I am not asking this because I wish to write myself the", "a better postdoc offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1), [Postdoc positions: turning down alternative offers safely and timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely),", "applications in progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/) . This would suggest to write a \"canonical question\" on", "This would suggest to write a \"canonical question\" on the subject. On the", "position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position) . Other older examples are [Is it OK to turn down a", "is appropriate to leave a (phd, postdoc, tenure-track...) position they have accepted for", "a general answer exists --- maybe all these questions have peculiarities that require", "safely and timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely), [Tenure-track offer with other applications in progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/) . This would", "myself the canonical question and answer -- on the contrary, I don't think", "them to be answered on an individual basis. What do you think about", "basis. What do you think about it? (I am not asking this because", "have incompatible deadlines. The last example is [Swap Postdoc position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position) . Other older", "position they have accepted for a better one that became available later, or", "to leave a (phd, postdoc, tenure-track...) position they have accepted for a better", "other hand, I am not so sure that a general answer exists ---", "postdoc offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1), [Postdoc positions: turning down alternative offers safely and timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely), [Tenure-track offer", "after getting a better postdoc offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1), [Postdoc positions: turning down alternative offers safely", "not so sure that a general answer exists --- maybe all these questions", "a \"canonical question\" on the subject. On the other hand, I am not", "peculiarities that require them to be answered on an individual basis. What do", "about it? (I am not asking this because I wish to write myself", "What do you think about it? (I am not asking this because I", "because I wish to write myself the canonical question and answer -- on", "not asking this because I wish to write myself the canonical question and", "think about it? (I am not asking this because I wish to write", "leave a (phd, postdoc, tenure-track...) position they have accepted for a better one", "getting a better postdoc offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1), [Postdoc positions: turning down alternative offers safely and", "OK to turn down a postdoc offer (contract not signed yet) after getting", "hand, I am not so sure that a general answer exists --- maybe", "--- maybe all these questions have peculiarities that require them to be answered", "better postdoc offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1), [Postdoc positions: turning down alternative offers safely and timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely), [Tenure-track", "do you think about it? (I am not asking this because I wish", "to write myself the canonical question and answer -- on the contrary, I", "how to behave when multiple positions have incompatible deadlines. The last example is", "offer (contract not signed yet) after getting a better postdoc offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1), [Postdoc positions:", "to be answered on an individual basis. What do you think about it?", "in progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/) . This would suggest to write a \"canonical question\" on the", "yet) after getting a better postdoc offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1), [Postdoc positions: turning down alternative offers", "for a better one that became available later, or in any case how", "whether it is appropriate to leave a (phd, postdoc, tenure-track...) position they have", "postdoc, tenure-track...) position they have accepted for a better one that became available", "later, or in any case how to behave when multiple positions have incompatible", "sure that a general answer exists --- maybe all these questions have peculiarities", "questions have peculiarities that require them to be answered on an individual basis.", "write a \"canonical question\" on the subject. On the other hand, I am", "on the subject. On the other hand, I am not so sure that", "the canonical question and answer -- on the contrary, I don't think I", "turn down a postdoc offer (contract not signed yet) after getting a better", "examples are [Is it OK to turn down a postdoc offer (contract not", "appropriate to leave a (phd, postdoc, tenure-track...) position they have accepted for a", "\"canonical question\" on the subject. On the other hand, I am not so", "they have accepted for a better one that became available later, or in", "accepted for a better one that became available later, or in any case", "an individual basis. What do you think about it? (I am not asking", "people ask whether it is appropriate to leave a (phd, postdoc, tenure-track...) position", "then people ask whether it is appropriate to leave a (phd, postdoc, tenure-track...)", "Other older examples are [Is it OK to turn down a postdoc offer", "incompatible deadlines. The last example is [Swap Postdoc position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position) . Other older examples", "to write a \"canonical question\" on the subject. On the other hand, I", "a better one that became available later, or in any case how to", "deadlines. The last example is [Swap Postdoc position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position) . Other older examples are", "ask whether it is appropriate to leave a (phd, postdoc, tenure-track...) position they", "answer -- on the contrary, I don't think I am experienced enough to", "positions have incompatible deadlines. The last example is [Swap Postdoc position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position) . Other", "to behave when multiple positions have incompatible deadlines. The last example is [Swap", "(phd, postdoc, tenure-track...) position they have accepted for a better one that became", "would suggest to write a \"canonical question\" on the subject. On the other", "became available later, or in any case how to behave when multiple positions", "available later, or in any case how to behave when multiple positions have", "now and then people ask whether it is appropriate to leave a (phd,", ". Other older examples are [Is it OK to turn down a postdoc", "[Is it OK to turn down a postdoc offer (contract not signed yet)", "maybe all these questions have peculiarities that require them to be answered on", "tenure-track...) position they have accepted for a better one that became available later,", "offer with other applications in progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/) . This would suggest to write a", "offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1), [Postdoc positions: turning down alternative offers safely and timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely), [Tenure-track offer with", "that became available later, or in any case how to behave when multiple", "down alternative offers safely and timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely), [Tenure-track offer with other applications in progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/)", "write myself the canonical question and answer -- on the contrary, I don't", "last example is [Swap Postdoc position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position) . Other older examples are [Is it", "not signed yet) after getting a better postdoc offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1), [Postdoc positions: turning down", "individual basis. What do you think about it? (I am not asking this", "that require them to be answered on an individual basis. What do you", "subject. On the other hand, I am not so sure that a general", ". This would suggest to write a \"canonical question\" on the subject. On", "on the contrary, I don't think I am experienced enough to answer this.)", "are [Is it OK to turn down a postdoc offer (contract not signed", "and then people ask whether it is appropriate to leave a (phd, postdoc,", "a (phd, postdoc, tenure-track...) position they have accepted for a better one that", "have peculiarities that require them to be answered on an individual basis. What", "case how to behave when multiple positions have incompatible deadlines. The last example", "and answer -- on the contrary, I don't think I am experienced enough", "question and answer -- on the contrary, I don't think I am experienced", "-- on the contrary, I don't think I am experienced enough to answer", "The last example is [Swap Postdoc position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position) . Other older examples are [Is", "it OK to turn down a postdoc offer (contract not signed yet) after", "example is [Swap Postdoc position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position) . Other older examples are [Is it OK", "am not asking this because I wish to write myself the canonical question", "behave when multiple positions have incompatible deadlines. The last example is [Swap Postdoc", "so sure that a general answer exists --- maybe all these questions have", "these questions have peculiarities that require them to be answered on an individual", "have accepted for a better one that became available later, or in any", "On the other hand, I am not so sure that a general answer", "Postdoc position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position) . Other older examples are [Is it OK to turn down", "to turn down a postdoc offer (contract not signed yet) after getting a", "timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely), [Tenure-track offer with other applications in progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/) . This would suggest to", "any case how to behave when multiple positions have incompatible deadlines. The last", "all these questions have peculiarities that require them to be answered on an", "on an individual basis. What do you think about it? (I am not", "other applications in progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/) . This would suggest to write a \"canonical question\"", "(contract not signed yet) after getting a better postdoc offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1), [Postdoc positions: turning", "canonical question and answer -- on the contrary, I don't think I am", "in any case how to behave when multiple positions have incompatible deadlines. The", "alternative offers safely and timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely), [Tenure-track offer with other applications in progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/) .", "the other hand, I am not so sure that a general answer exists", "[Tenure-track offer with other applications in progress](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/87912/tenure-track-offer-with-other-applications-in-progress/) . This would suggest to write", "better one that became available later, or in any case how to behave", "am not so sure that a general answer exists --- maybe all these", "or in any case how to behave when multiple positions have incompatible deadlines.", "exists --- maybe all these questions have peculiarities that require them to be", "down a postdoc offer (contract not signed yet) after getting a better postdoc", "the subject. On the other hand, I am not so sure that a", "suggest to write a \"canonical question\" on the subject. On the other hand,", "you think about it? (I am not asking this because I wish to", "I am not so sure that a general answer exists --- maybe all", "general answer exists --- maybe all these questions have peculiarities that require them", "when multiple positions have incompatible deadlines. The last example is [Swap Postdoc position](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97808/swap-postdoc-position)", "this because I wish to write myself the canonical question and answer --", "positions: turning down alternative offers safely and timely](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90104/postdoc-positions-turning-down-alternative-offers-safely-and-timely), [Tenure-track offer with other applications", "answered on an individual basis. What do you think about it? (I am", "wish to write myself the canonical question and answer -- on the contrary,", "require them to be answered on an individual basis. What do you think", "I wish to write myself the canonical question and answer -- on the", "Every now and then people ask whether it is appropriate to leave a", "postdoc offer (contract not signed yet) after getting a better postdoc offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1), [Postdoc", "question\" on the subject. On the other hand, I am not so sure", "signed yet) after getting a better postdoc offer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/74864/is-it-ok-to-turn-down-a-postdoc-offer-contract-not-signed-yet-after-getting-a?rq=1), [Postdoc positions: turning down alternative" ]
[ "notice recites: > > Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to", "use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide", "of communities a post notice for sensitive, possibly controversial topics. The notice recites:", "to this [meta post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/302609/300001), the SE staff has implemented for a couple of", "arguments or opinions without notice. > > > We sometimes receive questions about", "comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a", "asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice. > >", "many debates: Would such a notice be useful for our community as well?", "the SE staff has implemented for a couple of communities a post notice", "remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice. > > > We sometimes receive", "to provide a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove", "or opinions without notice. > > > We sometimes receive questions about gender", "receive questions about gender issues, harassment etc. that generate many debates: Would such", "will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice. > > > We sometimes", "gender issues, harassment etc. that generate many debates: Would such a notice be", "this [meta post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/302609/300001), the SE staff has implemented for a couple of communities", "to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions", "> > Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements.", "to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to", "[meta post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/302609/300001), the SE staff has implemented for a couple of communities a", "improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific", "> Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You", "opinions without notice. > > > We sometimes receive questions about gender issues,", "staff has implemented for a couple of communities a post notice for sensitive,", "solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or", "above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice. > > >", "communities a post notice for sensitive, possibly controversial topics. The notice recites: >", "ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will", "You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY", "provide a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates,", "post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/302609/300001), the SE staff has implemented for a couple of communities a post", "sensitive, possibly controversial topics. The notice recites: > > Controversial Post — You", "sometimes receive questions about gender issues, harassment etc. that generate many debates: Would", "— You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers", "We sometimes receive questions about gender issues, harassment etc. that generate many debates:", "the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without", "You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question", "> We sometimes receive questions about gender issues, harassment etc. that generate many", "suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the", "topics. The notice recites: > > Controversial Post — You may use comments", "question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice. >", "debates, arguments or opinions without notice. > > > We sometimes receive questions", "According to this [meta post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/302609/300001), the SE staff has implemented for a couple", "notice for sensitive, possibly controversial topics. The notice recites: > > Controversial Post", "without notice. > > > We sometimes receive questions about gender issues, harassment", "etc. that generate many debates: Would such a notice be useful for our", "a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments", "controversial topics. The notice recites: > > Controversial Post — You may use", "harassment etc. that generate many debates: Would such a notice be useful for", "that generate many debates: Would such a notice be useful for our community", "SE staff has implemented for a couple of communities a post notice for", "ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution", "issues, harassment etc. that generate many debates: Would such a notice be useful", "post notice for sensitive, possibly controversial topics. The notice recites: > > Controversial", "specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice.", "for sensitive, possibly controversial topics. The notice recites: > > Controversial Post —", "notice. > > > We sometimes receive questions about gender issues, harassment etc.", "> > > We sometimes receive questions about gender issues, harassment etc. that", "generate many debates: Would such a notice be useful for our community as", "a post notice for sensitive, possibly controversial topics. The notice recites: > >", "implemented for a couple of communities a post notice for sensitive, possibly controversial", "Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice. > > > We", "Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use", "about gender issues, harassment etc. that generate many debates: Would such a notice", "use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question asked above.", "a couple of communities a post notice for sensitive, possibly controversial topics. The", "for a couple of communities a post notice for sensitive, possibly controversial topics.", "questions about gender issues, harassment etc. that generate many debates: Would such a", "possibly controversial topics. The notice recites: > > Controversial Post — You may", "Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may", "may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to", "has implemented for a couple of communities a post notice for sensitive, possibly", "answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators", "may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question asked", "recites: > > Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest", "The notice recites: > > Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY", "couple of communities a post notice for sensitive, possibly controversial topics. The notice", "> > We sometimes receive questions about gender issues, harassment etc. that generate" ]
[ "I checked a full length paper on cracksat.com too. The questions are mostly", "to offend anyone. I'm in no way trying to insult the US education", "my question is; is it really that easy or I'm being trolled by", "I'm not sure if I can post it on the main site. Is", "education system so if at any point my post suggest that I'm, I", "is surely a problem, I mean 75 ques in 60 mins, is mad.", "I apologize.* I have a SAT Maths II and Physics Subject Test this", "too good to be true so my question is; is it really that", "suggest that I'm, I apologize.* I have a SAT Maths II and Physics", "school student from India, I got a question regarding SAT Subject Tests but", "full length paper on cracksat.com too. The questions are mostly conceptual which is", "My post is below: --- NOTE: I do not have any intentions to", "Time is surely a problem, I mean 75 ques in 60 mins, is", "to easy. It's like too good to be true so my question is;", "are SAT Subject Tests made this easy? [Take a Look at this for", "checked a full length paper on cracksat.com too. The questions are mostly conceptual", "Tests but I'm not sure if I can post it on the main", "anyone. I'm in no way trying to insult the US education system so", "Physics Subject Test this Saturday(4 Nov), I just bought Barron's Books to preparation", "can get help? My post is below: --- NOTE:* I do not have", "true so my question is; is it really that easy or I'm being", "is below: --- NOTE:* I do not have any intentions to offend anyone.", "but even then they are really easy. Time is surely a problem, I", "main site. Is there some other site where I can get help? My", "other site where I can get help? My post is below: --- NOTE:", "any intentions to offend anyone. I'm in no way trying to insult the", "not have any intentions to offend anyone. I'm in no way trying to", "I mean 75 ques in 60 mins, is mad. But are SAT Subject", "cracksat.com too. The questions are mostly conceptual which is nice cause calculator is", "I do not have any intentions to offend anyone. I'm in no way", "I'm being trolled by the book? Talking about Physics I checked a full", "way trying to insult the US education system so if at any point", "like too good to be true so my question is; is it really", "The questions are mostly conceptual which is nice cause calculator is not allowed", "sure if I can post it on the main site. Is there some", "any point my post suggest that I'm, I apologize.* I have a SAT", "not allowed but even then they are really easy. Time is surely a", "paper on cracksat.com too. The questions are mostly conceptual which is nice cause", "mins, is mad. But are SAT Subject Tests made this easy? [Take a", "surely a problem, I mean 75 ques in 60 mins, is mad. But", "do not have any intentions to offend anyone. I'm in no way trying", "Barron's Books to preparation and to my surprise, the test felt way to", "II and Physics Subject Test this Saturday(4 Nov), I just bought Barron's Books", "I'm in no way trying to insult the US education system so if", "felt way to easy. It's like too good to be true so my", "and Physics Subject Test this Saturday(4 Nov), I just bought Barron's Books to", "so my question is; is it really that easy or I'm being trolled", "preparation and to my surprise, the test felt way to easy. It's like", "which is nice cause calculator is not allowed but even then they are", "problem, I mean 75 ques in 60 mins, is mad. But are SAT", "easy. Time is surely a problem, I mean 75 ques in 60 mins,", "got a question regarding SAT Subject Tests but I'm not sure if I", "nice cause calculator is not allowed but even then they are really easy.", "not sure if I can post it on the main site. Is there", "help? My post is below: --- NOTE: I do not have any intentions", "being trolled by the book? Talking about Physics* I checked a full length", "SAT Subject Tests made this easy? [Take a Look at this for example](http://www.cracksat.net/sat2/physics/test616.html)", "mostly conceptual which is nice cause calculator is not allowed but even then", "calculator is not allowed but even then they are really easy. Time is", "no way trying to insult the US education system so if at any", "be true so my question is; is it really that easy or I'm", "easy or I'm being trolled by the book? Talking about Physics I checked", "are really easy. Time is surely a problem, I mean 75 ques in", "I have a SAT Maths II and Physics Subject Test this Saturday(4 Nov),", "test felt way to easy. It's like too good to be true so", "post is below: --- NOTE: I do not have any intentions to offend", "below: --- NOTE:* I do not have any intentions to offend anyone. I'm", "that easy or I'm being trolled by the book? Talking about Physics* I", "even then they are really easy. Time is surely a problem, I mean", "about Physics** I checked a full length paper on cracksat.com too. The questions", "a problem, I mean 75 ques in 60 mins, is mad. But are", "cause calculator is not allowed but even then they are really easy. Time", "75 ques in 60 mins, is mad. But are SAT Subject Tests made", "apologize.* I have a SAT Maths II and Physics Subject Test this Saturday(4", "a question regarding SAT Subject Tests but I'm not sure if I can", "regarding SAT Subject Tests but I'm not sure if I can post it", "surprise, the test felt way to easy. It's like too good to be", "trolled by the book? Talking about Physics I checked a full length paper", "Physics I checked a full length paper on cracksat.com too. The questions are", "if I can post it on the main site. Is there some other", "Test this Saturday(4 Nov), I just bought Barron's Books to preparation and to", "just bought Barron's Books to preparation and to my surprise, the test felt", "I can get help? My post is below: --- NOTE:** I do not", "the test felt way to easy. It's like too good to be true", "questions are mostly conceptual which is nice cause calculator is not allowed but", "high school student from India, I got a question regarding SAT Subject Tests", "Books to preparation and to my surprise, the test felt way to easy.", "have any intentions to offend anyone. I'm in no way trying to insult", "I just bought Barron's Books to preparation and to my surprise, the test", "intentions to offend anyone. I'm in no way trying to insult the US", "Maths II and Physics Subject Test this Saturday(4 Nov), I just bought Barron's", "get help? My post is below: --- NOTE:* I do not have any", "it on the main site. Is there some other site where I can", "point my post suggest that I'm, I apologize. I have a SAT Maths", "good to be true so my question is; is it really that easy", "to my surprise, the test felt way to easy. It's like too good", "the US education system so if at any point my post suggest that", "It's like too good to be true so my question is; is it", "on the main site. Is there some other site where I can get", "Subject Tests but I'm not sure if I can post it on the", "Subject Tests made this easy? [Take a Look at this for example](http://www.cracksat.net/sat2/physics/test616.html) ---", "site. Is there some other site where I can get help? My post", "in 60 mins, is mad. But are SAT Subject Tests made this easy?", "and to my surprise, the test felt way to easy. It's like too", "in no way trying to insult the US education system so if at", "Subject Test this Saturday(4 Nov), I just bought Barron's Books to preparation and", "where I can get help? My post is below: --- NOTE: I do", "really easy. Time is surely a problem, I mean 75 ques in 60", "length paper on cracksat.com too. The questions are mostly conceptual which is nice", "site where I can get help? My post is below: --- NOTE:* I", "trying to insult the US education system so if at any point my", "Is there some other site where I can get help? My post is", "to preparation and to my surprise, the test felt way to easy. It's", "allowed but even then they are really easy. Time is surely a problem,", "SAT Maths II and Physics Subject Test this Saturday(4 Nov), I just bought", "or I'm being trolled by the book? Talking about Physics* I checked a", "system so if at any point my post suggest that I'm, I apologize.", "Saturday(4 Nov), I just bought Barron's Books to preparation and to my surprise,", "from India, I got a question regarding SAT Subject Tests but I'm not", "there some other site where I can get help? My post is below:", "are mostly conceptual which is nice cause calculator is not allowed but even", "I can post it on the main site. Is there some other site", "US education system so if at any point my post suggest that I'm,", "easy. It's like too good to be true so my question is; is", "can post it on the main site. Is there some other site where", "the book? Talking about Physics* I checked a full length paper on cracksat.com", "is not allowed but even then they are really easy. Time is surely", "it really that easy or I'm being trolled by the book? *Talking about", "a full length paper on cracksat.com too. The questions are mostly conceptual which", "SAT Subject Tests but I'm not sure if I can post it on", "is; is it really that easy or I'm being trolled by the book?", "they are really easy. Time is surely a problem, I mean 75 ques", "so if at any point my post suggest that I'm, I apologize. I", "NOTE: I do not have any intentions to offend anyone. I'm in no", "is it really that easy or I'm being trolled by the book? Talking", "a high school student from India, I got a question regarding SAT Subject", "then they are really easy. Time is surely a problem, I mean 75", "some other site where I can get help? My post is below: ---", "at any point my post suggest that I'm, I apologize. I have a", "book? Talking about Physics I checked a full length paper on cracksat.com too.", "ques in 60 mins, is mad. But are SAT Subject Tests made this", "post it on the main site. Is there some other site where I", "but I'm not sure if I can post it on the main site.", "by the book? Talking about Physics I checked a full length paper on", "mean 75 ques in 60 mins, is mad. But are SAT Subject Tests", "a SAT Maths II and Physics Subject Test this Saturday(4 Nov), I just", "bought Barron's Books to preparation and to my surprise, the test felt way", "this Saturday(4 Nov), I just bought Barron's Books to preparation and to my", "the main site. Is there some other site where I can get help?", "offend anyone. I'm in no way trying to insult the US education system", "But are SAT Subject Tests made this easy? [Take a Look at this", "I'm, I apologize.* I have a SAT Maths II and Physics Subject Test", "too. The questions are mostly conceptual which is nice cause calculator is not", "have a SAT Maths II and Physics Subject Test this Saturday(4 Nov), I", "60 mins, is mad. But are SAT Subject Tests made this easy? [Take", "way to easy. It's like too good to be true so my question", "I got a question regarding SAT Subject Tests but I'm not sure if", "mad. But are SAT Subject Tests made this easy? [Take a Look at", "Nov), I just bought Barron's Books to preparation and to my surprise, the", "India, I got a question regarding SAT Subject Tests but I'm not sure", "insult the US education system so if at any point my post suggest", "student from India, I got a question regarding SAT Subject Tests but I'm", "to insult the US education system so if at any point my post", "question is; is it really that easy or I'm being trolled by the", "question regarding SAT Subject Tests but I'm not sure if I can post", "my surprise, the test felt way to easy. It's like too good to", "really that easy or I'm being trolled by the book? Talking about Physics", "is mad. But are SAT Subject Tests made this easy? [Take a Look", "on cracksat.com too. The questions are mostly conceptual which is nice cause calculator", "Talking about Physics I checked a full length paper on cracksat.com too. The", "is nice cause calculator is not allowed but even then they are really", "I'm a high school student from India, I got a question regarding SAT", "to be true so my question is; is it really that easy or", "that I'm, I apologize.* I have a SAT Maths II and Physics Subject", "conceptual which is nice cause calculator is not allowed but even then they", "--- NOTE: I do not have any intentions to offend anyone. I'm in", "if at any point my post suggest that I'm, I apologize. I have", "post suggest that I'm, I apologize.* I have a SAT Maths II and", "my post suggest that I'm, I apologize.* I have a SAT Maths II" ]
[ "it looks like a shopping request as its current form, but it is", "for a research field about academia and/or science will give me a systematic", "to ask questions on science and academia separately since they are convoluted and", "them? It's also hard to ask questions on science and academia separately since", "academia work (without having to browse Academia.SE too much)?\", and I don't think", "I agree that it looks like a shopping request as its current form,", "form, but it is stemmed from the question \"how to have a systematic", "is of any off-topic reason. Isn't looking for a research field about academia", "it is stemmed from the question \"how to have a systematic understanding on", "field about academia and/or science will give me a systematic understanding on them?", "hard to ask questions on science and academia separately since they are convoluted", "separately since they are convoluted and I want to have a broadest view", "how science and academia work (without having to browse Academia.SE too much)?\", and", "how academia works?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/98282/14341) I agree that it looks like a shopping request as", "since they are convoluted and I want to have a broadest view first.", "academia and/or science will give me a systematic understanding on them? It's also", "understanding on how science and academia work (without having to browse Academia.SE too", "as its current form, but it is stemmed from the question \"how to", "is stemmed from the question \"how to have a systematic understanding on how", "its current form, but it is stemmed from the question \"how to have", "a research field about academia and/or science will give me a systematic understanding", "give me a systematic understanding on them? It's also hard to ask questions", "the question \"how to have a systematic understanding on how science and academia", "[Is there a (text)book on how academia works?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/98282/14341) I agree that it looks", "I don't think that is of any off-topic reason. Isn't looking for a", "and academia work (without having to browse Academia.SE too much)?\", and I don't", "and academia separately since they are convoluted and I want to have a", "It's also hard to ask questions on science and academia separately since they", "me a systematic understanding on them? It's also hard to ask questions on", "from the question \"how to have a systematic understanding on how science and", "Isn't looking for a research field about academia and/or science will give me", "don't think that is of any off-topic reason. Isn't looking for a research", "(text)book on how academia works?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/98282/14341) I agree that it looks like a shopping", "off-topic reason. Isn't looking for a research field about academia and/or science will", "think that is of any off-topic reason. Isn't looking for a research field", "a systematic understanding on how science and academia work (without having to browse", "have a systematic understanding on how science and academia work (without having to", "like a shopping request as its current form, but it is stemmed from", "any off-topic reason. Isn't looking for a research field about academia and/or science", "will give me a systematic understanding on them? It's also hard to ask", "too much)?\", and I don't think that is of any off-topic reason. Isn't", "question \"how to have a systematic understanding on how science and academia work", "on how science and academia work (without having to browse Academia.SE too much)?\",", "shopping request as its current form, but it is stemmed from the question", "that it looks like a shopping request as its current form, but it", "systematic understanding on how science and academia work (without having to browse Academia.SE", "also hard to ask questions on science and academia separately since they are", "having to browse Academia.SE too much)?\", and I don't think that is of", "academia separately since they are convoluted and I want to have a broadest", "questions on science and academia separately since they are convoluted and I want", "current form, but it is stemmed from the question \"how to have a", "\"how to have a systematic understanding on how science and academia work (without", "science will give me a systematic understanding on them? It's also hard to", "looking for a research field about academia and/or science will give me a", "agree that it looks like a shopping request as its current form, but", "science and academia work (without having to browse Academia.SE too much)?\", and I", "on science and academia separately since they are convoluted and I want to", "research field about academia and/or science will give me a systematic understanding on", "request as its current form, but it is stemmed from the question \"how", "to have a systematic understanding on how science and academia work (without having", "that is of any off-topic reason. Isn't looking for a research field about", "on how academia works?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/98282/14341) I agree that it looks like a shopping request", "Academia.SE too much)?\", and I don't think that is of any off-topic reason.", "and I don't think that is of any off-topic reason. Isn't looking for", "work (without having to browse Academia.SE too much)?\", and I don't think that", "ask questions on science and academia separately since they are convoluted and I", "works?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/98282/14341) I agree that it looks like a shopping request as its current", "there a (text)book on how academia works?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/98282/14341) I agree that it looks like", "a (text)book on how academia works?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/98282/14341) I agree that it looks like a", "much)?\", and I don't think that is of any off-topic reason. Isn't looking", "a shopping request as its current form, but it is stemmed from the", "academia works?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/98282/14341) I agree that it looks like a shopping request as its", "stemmed from the question \"how to have a systematic understanding on how science", "and/or science will give me a systematic understanding on them? It's also hard", "to browse Academia.SE too much)?\", and I don't think that is of any", "but it is stemmed from the question \"how to have a systematic understanding", "reason. Isn't looking for a research field about academia and/or science will give", "about academia and/or science will give me a systematic understanding on them? It's", "science and academia separately since they are convoluted and I want to have", "a systematic understanding on them? It's also hard to ask questions on science", "on them? It's also hard to ask questions on science and academia separately", "looks like a shopping request as its current form, but it is stemmed", "browse Academia.SE too much)?\", and I don't think that is of any off-topic", "systematic understanding on them? It's also hard to ask questions on science and", "of any off-topic reason. Isn't looking for a research field about academia and/or", "understanding on them? It's also hard to ask questions on science and academia", "(without having to browse Academia.SE too much)?\", and I don't think that is" ]
[ "outstanding reason for deletion. It's been downvoted, but that doesn't mean it has", "? I don't see any outstanding reason for deletion. It's been downvoted, but", "reason for deletion. It's been downvoted, but that doesn't mean it has to", "deletion. It's been downvoted, but that doesn't mean it has to disappear from", "for deletion. It's been downvoted, but that doesn't mean it has to disappear", "see any outstanding reason for deletion. It's been downvoted, but that doesn't mean", "been downvoted, but that doesn't mean it has to disappear from the website.", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98458/958> ? I don't see any outstanding reason for deletion. It's been downvoted,", "It's been downvoted, but that doesn't mean it has to disappear from the", "don't see any outstanding reason for deletion. It's been downvoted, but that doesn't", "I don't see any outstanding reason for deletion. It's been downvoted, but that", "any outstanding reason for deletion. It's been downvoted, but that doesn't mean it" ]
[ "the question such that it actually fits his or her real question (here:", "inadequacy of the pair \"question - answer\" here. I am sure that such", "illogical. The particular case is exacerbated by the fact that `A` has shown", "aware of these issues or addressing them would probably raise the quality of", "the gap of knowledge\" (denoted by `Q` in the following). [The posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454) (denoted", "his or her real question (here: how to start working towards a PhD)", "an answer to a different question, namely, how to start the PhD studies", "namely, how to start the PhD studies properly, and this different question is,", "least logically or linguistically speaking. However, `R` has apparently been so helpful to", "inadequacies pop up every once in a while. Not sure how the community", "an answer to `A`, at least logically or linguistically speaking. However, `R` has", "[The posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454) (denoted by `R` in the following) says, essentially, \"don't do it,", "`Q`. There is an inadequacy of the pair \"question - answer\" here. I", "gap in knowledge, for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98469/the-gap-of-knowledge-how-can-we-find-it) asks \"How to find the gap of", "or her real question (here: how to start working towards a PhD) rather", "it, at least not now\". `R` is not an answer to `A`, at", "to `A`. As an answer to \"how to start the PhD studies properly\",", "much more important to `A`. As an answer to \"how to start the", "a different question, namely, how to start the PhD studies properly, and this", "to reformulate the question such that it actually fits his or her real", "\"don't do it, at least not now\". `R` is not an answer to", "following) says, essentially, \"don't do it, at least not now\". `R` is not", "`Q` (denoted by `A` in the following) such that `A` marked `R` as", "working towards a PhD) rather than the issue formally written in `Q`. There", "to a different question, namely, how to start the PhD studies properly, and", "different question, namely, how to start the PhD studies properly, and this different", "is, probably, much more important to `A`. As an answer to \"how to", "than the issue formally written in `Q`. There is an inadequacy of the", "in a while. Not sure how the community should address these pairs exactly,", "following) such that `A` marked `R` as an accepted solution. I guess, this", "a PhD) rather than the issue formally written in `Q`. There is an", "PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98469/the-gap-of-knowledge-how-can-we-find-it) asks \"How to find the gap of knowledge\" (denoted by `Q` in", "not an answer to `A`, at least logically or linguistically speaking. However, `R`", "or linguistically speaking. However, `R` has apparently been so helpful to the author", "every once in a while. Not sure how the community should address these", "being aware of these issues or addressing them would probably raise the quality", "`R` has apparently been so helpful to the author of `Q` (denoted by", "in knowledge, for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98469/the-gap-of-knowledge-how-can-we-find-it) asks \"How to find the gap of knowledge\"", "by `Q` in the following). [The posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454) (denoted by `R` in the following)", "start the PhD studies properly, and this different question is, probably, much more", "But as an answer to `Q`, the posting `R` illogical. The particular case", "an answer to `Q`, the posting `R` illogical. The particular case is exacerbated", "particular case is exacerbated by the fact that `A` has shown no wish", "to find a gap in knowledge, for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98469/the-gap-of-knowledge-how-can-we-find-it) asks \"How to find", "answer to \"how to start the PhD studies properly\", I like `R`, and", "PhD studies properly\", I like `R`, and do like it a lot. But", "sure that such inadequacies pop up every once in a while. Not sure", "posting [How to find a gap in knowledge, for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98469/the-gap-of-knowledge-how-can-we-find-it) asks \"How", "`R`, and do like it a lot. But as an answer to `Q`,", "`Q` in the following). [The posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454) (denoted by `R` in the following) says,", "essentially, \"don't do it, at least not now\". `R` is not an answer", "I guess, this is because `R` is an answer to a different question,", "fact that `A` has shown no wish to reformulate the question such that", "this different question is, probably, much more important to `A`. As an answer", "of `Q` (denoted by `A` in the following) such that `A` marked `R`", "these pairs exactly, but being aware of these issues or addressing them would", "exactly, but being aware of these issues or addressing them would probably raise", "PhD studies properly, and this different question is, probably, much more important to", "answer to `A`, at least logically or linguistically speaking. However, `R` has apparently", "linguistically speaking. However, `R` has apparently been so helpful to the author of", "guess, this is because `R` is an answer to a different question, namely,", "like it a lot. But as an answer to `Q`, the posting `R`", "the following) such that `A` marked `R` as an accepted solution. I guess,", "start working towards a PhD) rather than the issue formally written in `Q`.", "issue formally written in `Q`. There is an inadequacy of the pair \"question", "how the community should address these pairs exactly, but being aware of these", "to `Q`, the posting `R` illogical. The particular case is exacerbated by the", "As an answer to \"how to start the PhD studies properly\", I like", "The posting [How to find a gap in knowledge, for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98469/the-gap-of-knowledge-how-can-we-find-it) asks", "`A`. As an answer to \"how to start the PhD studies properly\", I", "towards a PhD) rather than the issue formally written in `Q`. There is", "answer\" here. I am sure that such inadequacies pop up every once in", "address these pairs exactly, but being aware of these issues or addressing them", "as an accepted solution. I guess, this is because `R` is an answer", "but being aware of these issues or addressing them would probably raise the", "a lot. But as an answer to `Q`, the posting `R` illogical. The", "by `R` in the following) says, essentially, \"don't do it, at least not", "pairs exactly, but being aware of these issues or addressing them would probably", "her real question (here: how to start working towards a PhD) rather than", "I like `R`, and do like it a lot. But as an answer", "start the PhD studies properly\", I like `R`, and do like it a", "\"how to start the PhD studies properly\", I like `R`, and do like", "asks \"How to find the gap of knowledge\" (denoted by `Q` in the", "has shown no wish to reformulate the question such that it actually fits", "it a lot. But as an answer to `Q`, the posting `R` illogical.", "logically or linguistically speaking. However, `R` has apparently been so helpful to the", "`R` as an accepted solution. I guess, this is because `R` is an", "do it, at least not now\". `R` is not an answer to `A`,", "to find the gap of knowledge\" (denoted by `Q` in the following). [The", "accepted solution. I guess, this is because `R` is an answer to a", "because `R` is an answer to a different question, namely, how to start", "formally written in `Q`. There is an inadequacy of the pair \"question -", "`A` in the following) such that `A` marked `R` as an accepted solution.", "question, namely, how to start the PhD studies properly, and this different question", "like `R`, and do like it a lot. But as an answer to", "The particular case is exacerbated by the fact that `A` has shown no", "such inadequacies pop up every once in a while. Not sure how the", "while. Not sure how the community should address these pairs exactly, but being", "\"question - answer\" here. I am sure that such inadequacies pop up every", "`R` is not an answer to `A`, at least logically or linguistically speaking.", "posting `R` illogical. The particular case is exacerbated by the fact that `A`", "as an answer to `Q`, the posting `R` illogical. The particular case is", "at least logically or linguistically speaking. However, `R` has apparently been so helpful", "to start the PhD studies properly\", I like `R`, and do like it", "a gap in knowledge, for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98469/the-gap-of-knowledge-how-can-we-find-it) asks \"How to find the gap", "in the following) such that `A` marked `R` as an accepted solution. I", "question (here: how to start working towards a PhD) rather than the issue", "the PhD studies properly, and this different question is, probably, much more important", "question is, probably, much more important to `A`. As an answer to \"how", "says, essentially, \"don't do it, at least not now\". `R` is not an", "the PhD studies properly\", I like `R`, and do like it a lot.", "lot. But as an answer to `Q`, the posting `R` illogical. The particular", "that `A` has shown no wish to reformulate the question such that it", "wish to reformulate the question such that it actually fits his or her", "reformulate the question such that it actually fits his or her real question", "- answer\" here. I am sure that such inadequacies pop up every once", "(denoted by `R` in the following) says, essentially, \"don't do it, at least", "is an answer to a different question, namely, how to start the PhD", "and do like it a lot. But as an answer to `Q`, the", "the issue formally written in `Q`. There is an inadequacy of the pair", "I am sure that such inadequacies pop up every once in a while.", "knowledge, for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98469/the-gap-of-knowledge-how-can-we-find-it) asks \"How to find the gap of knowledge\" (denoted", "am sure that such inadequacies pop up every once in a while. Not", "fits his or her real question (here: how to start working towards a", "that such inadequacies pop up every once in a while. Not sure how", "[How to find a gap in knowledge, for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98469/the-gap-of-knowledge-how-can-we-find-it) asks \"How to", "an inadequacy of the pair \"question - answer\" here. I am sure that", "my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98469/the-gap-of-knowledge-how-can-we-find-it) asks \"How to find the gap of knowledge\" (denoted by `Q`", "the fact that `A` has shown no wish to reformulate the question such", "such that `A` marked `R` as an accepted solution. I guess, this is", "`R` in the following) says, essentially, \"don't do it, at least not now\".", "marked `R` as an accepted solution. I guess, this is because `R` is", "that `A` marked `R` as an accepted solution. I guess, this is because", "different question is, probably, much more important to `A`. As an answer to", "case is exacerbated by the fact that `A` has shown no wish to", "apparently been so helpful to the author of `Q` (denoted by `A` in", "is exacerbated by the fact that `A` has shown no wish to reformulate", "real question (here: how to start working towards a PhD) rather than the", "is an inadequacy of the pair \"question - answer\" here. I am sure", "an accepted solution. I guess, this is because `R` is an answer to", "find the gap of knowledge\" (denoted by `Q` in the following). [The posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454)", "community should address these pairs exactly, but being aware of these issues or", "to the author of `Q` (denoted by `A` in the following) such that", "least not now\". `R` is not an answer to `A`, at least logically", "to `A`, at least logically or linguistically speaking. However, `R` has apparently been", "(denoted by `Q` in the following). [The posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454) (denoted by `R` in the", "the following) says, essentially, \"don't do it, at least not now\". `R` is", "for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98469/the-gap-of-knowledge-how-can-we-find-it) asks \"How to find the gap of knowledge\" (denoted by", "to start working towards a PhD) rather than the issue formally written in", "helpful to the author of `Q` (denoted by `A` in the following) such", "author of `Q` (denoted by `A` in the following) such that `A` marked", "how to start the PhD studies properly, and this different question is, probably,", "now\". `R` is not an answer to `A`, at least logically or linguistically", "this is because `R` is an answer to a different question, namely, how", "to \"how to start the PhD studies properly\", I like `R`, and do", "no wish to reformulate the question such that it actually fits his or", "`A` has shown no wish to reformulate the question such that it actually", "studies properly, and this different question is, probably, much more important to `A`.", "(here: how to start working towards a PhD) rather than the issue formally", "`Q`, the posting `R` illogical. The particular case is exacerbated by the fact", "`R` is an answer to a different question, namely, how to start the", "written in `Q`. There is an inadequacy of the pair \"question - answer\"", "the pair \"question - answer\" here. I am sure that such inadequacies pop", "question such that it actually fits his or her real question (here: how", "a while. Not sure how the community should address these pairs exactly, but", "that it actually fits his or her real question (here: how to start", "should address these pairs exactly, but being aware of these issues or addressing", "is because `R` is an answer to a different question, namely, how to", "speaking. However, `R` has apparently been so helpful to the author of `Q`", "(denoted by `A` in the following) such that `A` marked `R` as an", "of knowledge\" (denoted by `Q` in the following). [The posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454) (denoted by `R`", "of these issues or addressing them would probably raise the quality of the", "at least not now\". `R` is not an answer to `A`, at least", "`A`, at least logically or linguistically speaking. However, `R` has apparently been so", "in the following). [The posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454) (denoted by `R` in the following) says, essentially,", "`R` illogical. The particular case is exacerbated by the fact that `A` has", "not now\". `R` is not an answer to `A`, at least logically or", "by the fact that `A` has shown no wish to reformulate the question", "it actually fits his or her real question (here: how to start working", "the community should address these pairs exactly, but being aware of these issues", "by `A` in the following) such that `A` marked `R` as an accepted", "properly\", I like `R`, and do like it a lot. But as an", "properly, and this different question is, probably, much more important to `A`. As", "pair \"question - answer\" here. I am sure that such inadequacies pop up", "up every once in a while. Not sure how the community should address", "the following). [The posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454) (denoted by `R` in the following) says, essentially, \"don't", "sure how the community should address these pairs exactly, but being aware of", "an answer to \"how to start the PhD studies properly\", I like `R`,", "rather than the issue formally written in `Q`. There is an inadequacy of", "in the following) says, essentially, \"don't do it, at least not now\". `R`", "and this different question is, probably, much more important to `A`. As an", "do like it a lot. But as an answer to `Q`, the posting", "in `Q`. There is an inadequacy of the pair \"question - answer\" here.", "once in a while. Not sure how the community should address these pairs", "answer to `Q`, the posting `R` illogical. The particular case is exacerbated by", "to start the PhD studies properly, and this different question is, probably, much", "is not an answer to `A`, at least logically or linguistically speaking. However,", "exacerbated by the fact that `A` has shown no wish to reformulate the", "posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454) (denoted by `R` in the following) says, essentially, \"don't do it, at", "how to start working towards a PhD) rather than the issue formally written", "knowledge\" (denoted by `Q` in the following). [The posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454) (denoted by `R` in", "However, `R` has apparently been so helpful to the author of `Q` (denoted", "actually fits his or her real question (here: how to start working towards", "`A` marked `R` as an accepted solution. I guess, this is because `R`", "shown no wish to reformulate the question such that it actually fits his", "probably, much more important to `A`. As an answer to \"how to start", "these issues or addressing them would probably raise the quality of the site.", "studies properly\", I like `R`, and do like it a lot. But as", "of the pair \"question - answer\" here. I am sure that such inadequacies", "Not sure how the community should address these pairs exactly, but being aware", "more important to `A`. As an answer to \"how to start the PhD", "so helpful to the author of `Q` (denoted by `A` in the following)", "answer to a different question, namely, how to start the PhD studies properly,", "important to `A`. As an answer to \"how to start the PhD studies", "PhD) rather than the issue formally written in `Q`. There is an inadequacy", "\"How to find the gap of knowledge\" (denoted by `Q` in the following).", "the author of `Q` (denoted by `A` in the following) such that `A`", "such that it actually fits his or her real question (here: how to", "pop up every once in a while. Not sure how the community should", "There is an inadequacy of the pair \"question - answer\" here. I am", "gap of knowledge\" (denoted by `Q` in the following). [The posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454) (denoted by", "following). [The posting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/98509/80454) (denoted by `R` in the following) says, essentially, \"don't do", "find a gap in knowledge, for my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98469/the-gap-of-knowledge-how-can-we-find-it) asks \"How to find the", "has apparently been so helpful to the author of `Q` (denoted by `A`", "solution. I guess, this is because `R` is an answer to a different", "here. I am sure that such inadequacies pop up every once in a", "the posting `R` illogical. The particular case is exacerbated by the fact that", "been so helpful to the author of `Q` (denoted by `A` in the" ]
[ "cost was not great (15 minutes at most), I would prefer that the", "and looking at the bigger picture, wouldn't there be reason to believe future", "the negative connotations, would there be value in allowing bad questions (that are", "answered the question. Although the cost was not great (15 minutes at most),", "But despite the negative connotations, would there be value in allowing bad questions", "negative connotations, would there be value in allowing bad questions (that are ultimately", "questions (that are ultimately closed) that had an answer that effectively addresses the", "wasted. Taking a step back and looking at the bigger picture, wouldn't there", "minutes at most), I would prefer that the effort was not wasted. Taking", "despite the negative connotations, would there be value in allowing bad questions (that", "be value in allowing bad questions (that are ultimately closed) that had an", "the question? Please excuse the potential bias as the person who answered the", "excuse the potential bias as the person who answered the question. Although the", "in allowing bad questions (that are ultimately closed) that had an answer that", "most), I would prefer that the effort was not wasted. Taking a step", "connotations, would there be value in allowing bad questions (that are ultimately closed)", "addresses the question? Please excuse the potential bias as the person who answered", "back and looking at the bigger picture, wouldn't there be reason to believe", "that the effort was not wasted. Taking a step back and looking at", "not wasted. Taking a step back and looking at the bigger picture, wouldn't", "would there be value in allowing bad questions (that are ultimately closed) that", "Although the cost was not great (15 minutes at most), I would prefer", "value in allowing bad questions (that are ultimately closed) that had an answer", "answer that effectively addresses the question? Please excuse the potential bias as the", "future authors of answers to bad questions would prefer that their efforts are", "closed) that had an answer that effectively addresses the question? Please excuse the", "answers to bad questions would prefer that their efforts are not deleted either?", "looking at the bigger picture, wouldn't there be reason to believe future authors", "bad taste after very negative commentary from the OP. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>. But despite the", "Taking a step back and looking at the bigger picture, wouldn't there be", "taste after very negative commentary from the OP. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>. But despite the negative", "effectively addresses the question? Please excuse the potential bias as the person who", "commentary from the OP. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>. But despite the negative connotations, would there be", "be reason to believe future authors of answers to bad questions would prefer", "there be value in allowing bad questions (that are ultimately closed) that had", "I would agree was in bad taste after very negative commentary from the", "was in bad taste after very negative commentary from the OP. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>. But", "great (15 minutes at most), I would prefer that the effort was not", "deleted a question that I would agree was in bad taste after very", "was not great (15 minutes at most), I would prefer that the effort", "the effort was not wasted. Taking a step back and looking at the", "very negative commentary from the OP. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>. But despite the negative connotations, would", "the potential bias as the person who answered the question. Although the cost", "that had an answer that effectively addresses the question? Please excuse the potential", "are ultimately closed) that had an answer that effectively addresses the question? Please", "agree was in bad taste after very negative commentary from the OP. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>.", "believe future authors of answers to bad questions would prefer that their efforts", "picture, wouldn't there be reason to believe future authors of answers to bad", "step back and looking at the bigger picture, wouldn't there be reason to", "prefer that the effort was not wasted. Taking a step back and looking", "as the person who answered the question. Although the cost was not great", "had an answer that effectively addresses the question? Please excuse the potential bias", "not great (15 minutes at most), I would prefer that the effort was", "Very recently moderator ff524, deleted a question that I would agree was in", "at the bigger picture, wouldn't there be reason to believe future authors of", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>. But despite the negative connotations, would there be value in allowing bad", "was not wasted. Taking a step back and looking at the bigger picture,", "recently moderator ff524, deleted a question that I would agree was in bad", "OP. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>. But despite the negative connotations, would there be value in allowing", "from the OP. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>. But despite the negative connotations, would there be value", "would prefer that the effort was not wasted. Taking a step back and", "effort was not wasted. Taking a step back and looking at the bigger", "question that I would agree was in bad taste after very negative commentary", "at most), I would prefer that the effort was not wasted. Taking a", "authors of answers to bad questions would prefer that their efforts are not", "(15 minutes at most), I would prefer that the effort was not wasted.", "Please excuse the potential bias as the person who answered the question. Although", "moderator ff524, deleted a question that I would agree was in bad taste", "bad questions (that are ultimately closed) that had an answer that effectively addresses", "ultimately closed) that had an answer that effectively addresses the question? Please excuse", "that effectively addresses the question? Please excuse the potential bias as the person", "bias as the person who answered the question. Although the cost was not", "there be reason to believe future authors of answers to bad questions would", "the OP. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>. But despite the negative connotations, would there be value in", "to believe future authors of answers to bad questions would prefer that their", "after very negative commentary from the OP. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>. But despite the negative connotations,", "of answers to bad questions would prefer that their efforts are not deleted", "potential bias as the person who answered the question. Although the cost was", "person who answered the question. Although the cost was not great (15 minutes", "bigger picture, wouldn't there be reason to believe future authors of answers to", "a question that I would agree was in bad taste after very negative", "wouldn't there be reason to believe future authors of answers to bad questions", "would agree was in bad taste after very negative commentary from the OP.", "who answered the question. Although the cost was not great (15 minutes at", "I would prefer that the effort was not wasted. Taking a step back", "the bigger picture, wouldn't there be reason to believe future authors of answers", "(that are ultimately closed) that had an answer that effectively addresses the question?", "the person who answered the question. Although the cost was not great (15", "a step back and looking at the bigger picture, wouldn't there be reason", "that I would agree was in bad taste after very negative commentary from", "in bad taste after very negative commentary from the OP. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>. But despite", "the question. Although the cost was not great (15 minutes at most), I", "question. Although the cost was not great (15 minutes at most), I would", "ff524, deleted a question that I would agree was in bad taste after", "reason to believe future authors of answers to bad questions would prefer that", "negative commentary from the OP. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98902/is-it-a-good-idea-to-take-several-summer-classes-have-a-tutor-after-school-sinc/98903#98903>. But despite the negative connotations, would there", "allowing bad questions (that are ultimately closed) that had an answer that effectively", "the cost was not great (15 minutes at most), I would prefer that", "question? Please excuse the potential bias as the person who answered the question.", "an answer that effectively addresses the question? Please excuse the potential bias as" ]
[ "contributions from users from both sites whether with a pseudonym or real-ID. But", "The various logical derivatives: * Does real-ID mean higher-quality questions? * Does real-ID", "voting system reflected up on a user's contribution. * Effect: more privileges and", "sites, specifically [Mathematics SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi). But purely on mathematics topics. With the following variables", "pseudonym. * Effect: if real-life, then words said would carry over to their", "a pseudonym. I could be entirely wrong after all, would someone with more", "lower-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality answers? In my experience at the", "with Moderator ff524 on all points. But this led me to think about", "be used as a rough yardstick to measure the experience of the user", "other sites that are not as strict about moderation - Reddit, etc. SE", "to their IRL identity. If pseudonym, then there is a degree of buffer", "Moderator ff524 mentioned, > > There are other sites that are not as", "questions? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality answers? In my experience at the [Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users)", "upon a voting system reflected up on a user's contribution. * Effect: more", "[Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163): * Binary: has an equivalent real-life ID associated, or a pseudonym. ", "deliberately different in its moderation policy, because we try to be a home", "sites that are not as strict about moderation* - Reddit, etc. SE is", "Effect: more privileges and respect afforded to the user and can be used", "play, but not to the extent that I theorize. There are great question", "more privileges and respect afforded to the user and can be used as", "I would presume that Anonymity has a role to play, but not to", "mine. I agree with Moderator ff524 on all points. But this led me", "questions? * Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality answers? * Does real-ID mean lower-quality questions?", "experience at the [Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users) as well as [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users), I would presume that Anonymity", "ff524 on all points. But this led me to think about the effects", "particular case, the [author of the deleted question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi) has some experience and interaction", "interaction with SE sites, specifically [Mathematics SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi). But purely on mathematics topics. With", "play (not exactly rigorous, but will suffice in the meantime): [Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163): * Binary:", "higher-quality answers? * Does real-ID mean lower-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean lower-quality", "But purely on mathematics topics. With the following variables on anonymity in play", "lower-quality answers? In my experience at the [Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users) as well as [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users), I", "[Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users) as well as [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users), I would presume that Anonymity has a role", "is the effect of Anonymity on both the quality of questions and answers?", "experience and interaction with SE sites, specifically [Mathematics SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi). But purely on mathematics", "on mathematics topics. With the following variables on anonymity in play (not exactly", "> There are other sites that are not as strict about moderation -", "to play, but not to the extent that I theorize. There are great", "led me to think about the effects of Anonymity on both questions and", "In this particular case, the [author of the deleted question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi) has some experience", "policy, because we try to be a home for people who like answering", "my experience at the [Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users) as well as [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users), I would presume that", "and answer contributions from users from both sites whether with a pseudonym or", "SE is deliberately different in its moderation policy, because we try to be", "the quality of questions and answers? The various logical derivatives: * Does real-ID", "answers?** The various logical derivatives: * Does real-ID mean higher-quality questions? * Does", "I theorize. There are great question and answer contributions from users from both", "> > Emphasis mine. I agree with Moderator ff524 on all points. But", "mean higher-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean higher-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms mean", "* Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality answers? In my experience at the [Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users) as", "anonymity in play (not exactly rigorous, but will suffice in the meantime): [Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163):", "pseudonyms mean lower-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality answers? In my experience", "mentioned, > > There are other sites that are not as *strict about", "[author of the deleted question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi) has some experience and interaction with SE sites,", "higher-quality questions? Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality answers? * Does real-ID mean lower-quality", "quality of questions and answers?** The various logical derivatives: * Does real-ID mean", "too ;) > > > Emphasis mine. I agree with Moderator ff524 on", "answers? * Does real-ID mean lower-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean lower-quality answers?", "There are other sites that are not as strict about moderation - Reddit,", "with SE sites, specifically [Mathematics SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi). But purely on mathematics topics. With the", "in general, poor-quality questions and answers are from pseudonyms; whether due to inexperience", "Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality answers? * Does real-ID mean lower-quality questions? * Does", "are other sites that are not as strict about moderation - Reddit, etc.", "people who like answering high quality, on topic questions. But some of our", "about a [deleted question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)). Moderator ff524 mentioned, > > There are other sites", "are great question and answer contributions from users from both sites whether with", "yardstick to measure the experience of the user to the SE model. What", "general, poor-quality questions and answers are from pseudonyms; whether due to inexperience or", "two. [Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation): * Integer: based upon a voting system reflected up on a", "various logical derivatives: * Does real-ID mean higher-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean", "mean higher-quality answers? * Does real-ID mean lower-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean", "myself and moderator ff524 about a [deleted question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)). Moderator ff524 mentioned, > >", "pseudonyms; whether due to inexperience or the buffer (between a person's actions and", "suffice in the meantime): [Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163): * Binary: has an equivalent real-life ID associated,", "is deliberately different in its moderation policy, because we try to be a", "user and can be used as a rough yardstick to measure the experience", "of questions and answers?** The various logical derivatives: * Does real-ID mean higher-quality", "a voting system reflected up on a user's contribution. * Effect: more privileges", "the user and can be used as a rough yardstick to measure the", "and answers?** The various logical derivatives: * Does real-ID mean higher-quality questions? ", " Does real-ID mean lower-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean lower-quality answers? ", "the effects of Anonymity on both questions and answers in [Academia specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be). In", "real-ID mean higher-quality answers? Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms", "model. *What is the effect of Anonymity on both the quality of questions", "or real-ID. But in general, poor-quality questions and answers are from pseudonyms; whether", "a rough yardstick to measure the experience of the user to the SE", "the extent that I theorize. There are great question and answer contributions from", "mean higher-quality questions? Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality answers? * Does real-ID mean", "based upon a voting system reflected up on a user's contribution. * Effect:", "inexperience or the buffer (between a person's actions and his/her real-life identity) offered", "lower-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean lower-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality", "over to their IRL identity. If pseudonym, then there is a degree of", "used as a rough yardstick to measure the experience of the user to", "moderator ff524 about a [deleted question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)). Moderator ff524 mentioned, > > There are", "the user to the SE model. What is the effect of Anonymity on", "experience of the user to the SE model. What is the effect of", "and interaction with SE sites, specifically [Mathematics SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi). But purely on mathematics topics.", "SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi). But purely on mathematics topics. With the following variables on anonymity in", "in [Academia specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be). In this particular case, the [author of the deleted question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi)", "be a home for people who like answering high quality, on topic questions.", "But this led me to think about the effects of Anonymity on both", "words said would carry over to their IRL identity. If pseudonym, then there", "a person's actions and his/her real-life identity) offered by a pseudonym. I could", "the effect of Anonymity on both the quality of questions and answers?** The", "contribution. * Effect: more privileges and respect afforded to the user and can", "rough yardstick to measure the experience of the user to the SE model.", "answers? In my experience at the [Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users) as well as [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users), I would", "from both sites whether with a pseudonym or real-ID. But in general, poor-quality", "There are great question and answer contributions from users from both sites whether", "* Effect: more privileges and respect afforded to the user and can be", "topic questions. But some of our users enjoy contributing to those other sites,", "on both the quality of questions and answers? The various logical derivatives: ", "in play (not exactly rigorous, but will suffice in the meantime): [Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163): ", "some experience and interaction with SE sites, specifically [Mathematics SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi). But purely on", "mean higher-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean", "> Emphasis mine. I agree with Moderator ff524 on all points. But this", "to the SE model. *What is the effect of Anonymity on both the", " Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality answers? ", " Integer: based upon a voting system reflected up on a user's contribution.", "contributing to those other sites, too ;) > > > Emphasis mine. I", "pseudonym. I could be entirely wrong after all, would someone with more expertise", "effect of Anonymity on both the quality of questions and answers?** The various", "* Does real-ID mean lower-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality questions? ", "then there is a degree of buffer between the two. [Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation): Integer:", "said would carry over to their IRL identity. If pseudonym, then there is", "mean lower-quality answers? In my experience at the [Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users) as well as [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users),", "be entirely wrong after all, would someone with more expertise on the matter", "me to think about the effects of Anonymity on both questions and answers", "can be used as a rough yardstick to measure the experience of the", "person's actions and his/her real-life identity) offered by a pseudonym. I could be", "*What is the effect of Anonymity on both the quality of questions and", "real-life, then words said would carry over to their IRL identity. If pseudonym,", "then words said would carry over to their IRL identity. If pseudonym, then", "mean lower-quality questions? Does real-ID mean lower-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms mean", "equivalent real-life ID associated, or a pseudonym. * Effect: if real-life, then words", "and can be used as a rough yardstick to measure the experience of", "mean lower-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality answers? In my experience at", "buffer (between a person's actions and his/her real-life identity) offered by a pseudonym.", "measure the experience of the user to the SE model. *What is the", "both sites whether with a pseudonym or real-ID. But in general, poor-quality questions", "about the effects of Anonymity on both questions and answers in [Academia specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be).", "will suffice in the meantime): [Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163): Binary: has an equivalent real-life ID", "and answers in [Academia specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be). In this particular case, the [author of the", "variables on anonymity in play (not exactly rigorous, but will suffice in the", "not to the extent that I theorize. There are great question and answer", "at the [Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users) as well as [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users), I would presume that Anonymity has", "of buffer between the two. [Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation): * Integer: based upon a voting system", "respect afforded to the user and can be used as a rough yardstick", "that I theorize. There are great question and answer contributions from users from", "* Binary: has an equivalent real-life ID associated, or a pseudonym. * Effect:", "questions and answers are from pseudonyms; whether due to inexperience or the buffer", "[Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation): * Integer: based upon a voting system reflected up on a user's", "reflected up on a user's contribution. * Effect: more privileges and respect afforded", "and answers are from pseudonyms; whether due to inexperience or the buffer (between", "to inexperience or the buffer (between a person's actions and his/her real-life identity)", "Does real-ID mean higher-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean higher-quality answers? * Does", "the two. [Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation): * Integer: based upon a voting system reflected up on", "mean lower-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean", "as strict about moderation - Reddit, etc. SE is deliberately different in its", "answer contributions from users from both sites whether with a pseudonym or real-ID.", "who like answering high quality, on topic questions. But some of our users", "the buffer (between a person's actions and his/her real-life identity) offered by a", "rigorous, but will suffice in the meantime): [Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163): * Binary: has an equivalent", "in the meantime): [Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163): * Binary: has an equivalent real-life ID associated, or", "a pseudonym. * Effect: if real-life, then words said would carry over to", "identity) offered by a pseudonym. I could be entirely wrong after all, would", "user's contribution. * Effect: more privileges and respect afforded to the user and", "system reflected up on a user's contribution. * Effect: more privileges and respect", "[short discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3873/allowing-questions-that-warranted-a-deletion-but-has-an-answer-that-addresses-t) between myself and moderator ff524 about a [deleted question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)). Moderator ff524", "that are not as strict about moderation - Reddit, etc. SE is *deliberately", "a [short discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3873/allowing-questions-that-warranted-a-deletion-but-has-an-answer-that-addresses-t) between myself and moderator ff524 about a [deleted question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)). Moderator", "a pseudonym or real-ID. But in general, poor-quality questions and answers are from", "(not exactly rigorous, but will suffice in the meantime): [Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163): Binary: has", "ff524 mentioned, > > There are other sites that are not as *strict", "higher-quality answers? Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality", "theorize. There are great question and answer contributions from users from both sites", "from users from both sites whether with a pseudonym or real-ID. But in", "answers? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality answers?", "case, the [author of the deleted question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi) has some experience and interaction with", "afforded to the user and can be used as a rough yardstick to", "not as strict about moderation - Reddit, etc. SE is *deliberately different in", " Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality answers? * Does real-ID mean lower-quality questions? ", "moderation* - Reddit, etc. SE is deliberately different in its moderation policy, because", "actions and his/her real-life identity) offered by a pseudonym. I could be entirely", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi) has some experience and interaction with SE sites, specifically [Mathematics SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi). But", "or the buffer (between a person's actions and his/her real-life identity) offered by", "[Mathematics SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi). But purely on mathematics topics. With the following variables on anonymity", "discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3873/allowing-questions-that-warranted-a-deletion-but-has-an-answer-that-addresses-t) between myself and moderator ff524 about a [deleted question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)). Moderator ff524 mentioned,", "its moderation policy, because we try to be a home for people who", "real-ID. But in general, poor-quality questions and answers are from pseudonyms; whether due", "a degree of buffer between the two. [Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation): * Integer: based upon a", "the SE model. *What is the effect of Anonymity on both the quality", "Does real-ID mean higher-quality answers? Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality questions? * Does", "strict about moderation - Reddit, etc. SE is deliberately different in its moderation", "this led me to think about the effects of Anonymity on both questions", "wrong after all, would someone with more expertise on the matter care to", "home for people who like answering high quality, on topic questions. But some", "on anonymity in play (not exactly rigorous, but will suffice in the meantime):", "because we try to be a home for people who like answering high", "would carry over to their IRL identity. If pseudonym, then there is a", "answering high quality, on topic questions. But some of our users enjoy contributing", "deleted question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi) has some experience and interaction with SE sites, specifically [Mathematics SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi).", "questions. But some of our users enjoy contributing to those other sites, too", "users enjoy contributing to those other sites, too ;) > > > Emphasis", "question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)). Moderator ff524 mentioned, > > There are other sites that are not", "extent that I theorize. There are great question and answer contributions from users", "to the extent that I theorize. There are great question and answer contributions", "But some of our users enjoy contributing to those other sites, too ;)", "would presume that Anonymity has a role to play, but not to the", "for people who like answering high quality, on topic questions*. But some of", "has a role to play, but not to the extent that I theorize.", "between the two. [Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation): Integer: based upon a voting system reflected up", "specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be). In this particular case, the [author of the deleted question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi) has some", "by a pseudonym. I could be entirely wrong after all, would someone with", "Does real-ID mean lower-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality questions? * Does", "our users enjoy contributing to those other sites, too ;) > > >", "the [Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users) as well as [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users), I would presume that Anonymity has a", "effects of Anonymity on both questions and answers in [Academia specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be). In this", "carry over to their IRL identity. If pseudonym, then there is a degree", "I could be entirely wrong after all, would someone with more expertise on", "could be entirely wrong after all, would someone with more expertise on the", "those other sites, too ;) > > > Emphasis mine. I agree with", "questions and answers?** The various logical derivatives: * Does real-ID mean higher-quality questions?", "Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality answers? In my", "we try to be a *home for people who like answering high quality,", "(between a person's actions and his/her real-life identity) offered by a pseudonym. I", "with a pseudonym or real-ID. But in general, poor-quality questions and answers are", "there is a degree of buffer between the two. [Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation): Integer: based", "as [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users), I would presume that Anonymity has a role to play, but", "Anonymity has a role to play, but not to the extent that I", "high quality, on topic questions*. But some of our users enjoy contributing to", "questions and answers in [Academia specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be). In this particular case, the [author of", "to think about the effects of Anonymity on both questions and answers in", "real-life identity) offered by a pseudonym. I could be entirely wrong after all,", "If pseudonym, then there is a degree of buffer between the two. [Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation):", "a user's contribution. Effect: more privileges and respect afforded to the user", "great question and answer contributions from users from both sites whether with a", "whether with a pseudonym or real-ID. But in general, poor-quality questions and answers", "answers are from pseudonyms; whether due to inexperience or the buffer (between a", "to those other sites, too ;) > > > Emphasis mine. I agree", "after all, would someone with more expertise on the matter care to comment?", "Integer: based upon a voting system reflected up on a user's contribution. ", "are from pseudonyms; whether due to inexperience or the buffer (between a person's", "but will suffice in the meantime): [Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163): Binary: has an equivalent real-life", "pseudonym, then there is a degree of buffer between the two. [Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation): ", "the meantime): [Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163): Binary: has an equivalent real-life ID associated, or a", "a role to play, but not to the extent that I theorize. There", "ID associated, or a pseudonym. * Effect: if real-life, then words said would", "meantime): [Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163): * Binary: has an equivalent real-life ID associated, or a pseudonym.", "privileges and respect afforded to the user and can be used as a", "are not as strict about moderation - Reddit, etc. SE is *deliberately different", "on a user's contribution. Effect: more privileges and respect afforded to the", "and respect afforded to the user and can be used as a rough", "the deleted question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi) has some experience and interaction with SE sites, specifically [Mathematics", "topics. With the following variables on anonymity in play (not exactly rigorous, but", "as well as [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users), I would presume that Anonymity has a role to", "> > There are other sites that are not as strict about moderation", "to be a home for people who like answering high quality, on topic", "sites, too ;) > > > Emphasis mine. I agree with Moderator ff524", "a home for people who like answering high quality, on topic questions. But", "question and answer contributions from users from both sites whether with a pseudonym", "of Anonymity on both the quality of questions and answers? The various logical", "different in its moderation policy, because we try to be a home for", "presume that Anonymity has a role to play, but not to the extent", "try to be a *home for people who like answering high quality, on", "pseudonyms mean higher-quality answers? Does real-ID mean lower-quality questions? * Does real-ID", "some of our users enjoy contributing to those other sites, too ;) >", "other sites, too ;) > > > Emphasis mine. I agree with Moderator", "ff524 about a [deleted question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)). Moderator ff524 mentioned, > > There are other", "has some experience and interaction with SE sites, specifically [Mathematics SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi). But purely", "of the deleted question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi) has some experience and interaction with SE sites, specifically", "due to inexperience or the buffer (between a person's actions and his/her real-life", "answers? * Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality answers?", "between myself and moderator ff524 about a [deleted question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)). Moderator ff524 mentioned, >", "both the quality of questions and answers?** The various logical derivatives: * Does", "but not to the extent that I theorize. There are great question and", "- Reddit, etc. SE is deliberately different in its moderation policy, because we", "> > > Emphasis mine. I agree with Moderator ff524 on all points.", "on all points. But this led me to think about the effects of", "as a rough yardstick to measure the experience of the user to the", "Reddit, etc. SE is deliberately different in its moderation policy, because we try", "agree with Moderator ff524 on all points. But this led me to think", "of Anonymity on both questions and answers in [Academia specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be). In this particular", "Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality answers? * Does", "that Anonymity has a role to play, but not to the extent that", "In my experience at the [Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users) as well as [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users), I would presume", "* Does real-ID mean higher-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality questions? ", "is a degree of buffer between the two. [Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation): Integer: based upon", "pseudonyms mean higher-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality answers? * Does real-ID", "or a pseudonym. * Effect: if real-life, then words said would carry over", "associated, or a pseudonym. * Effect: if real-life, then words said would carry", "role to play, but not to the extent that I theorize. There are", "of our users enjoy contributing to those other sites, too ;) > >", "on topic questions*. But some of our users enjoy contributing to those other", "[Academia specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be). In this particular case, the [author of the deleted question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi) has", "this particular case, the [author of the deleted question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi) has some experience and", "questions? Does real-ID mean lower-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality questions?", "Emphasis mine. I agree with Moderator ff524 on all points. But this led", "the [author of the deleted question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/82877/nexusoi) has some experience and interaction with SE", "points. But this led me to think about the effects of Anonymity on", "real-ID mean lower-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean lower-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms", "logical derivatives: * Does real-ID mean higher-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean higher-quality", "etc. SE is deliberately different in its moderation policy, because we try to", "real-ID mean higher-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean higher-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms", "well as [Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users), I would presume that Anonymity has a role to play,", "from pseudonyms; whether due to inexperience or the buffer (between a person's actions", "[deleted question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)). Moderator ff524 mentioned, > > There are other sites that are", "his/her real-life identity) offered by a pseudonym. I could be entirely wrong after", "of the user to the SE model. *What is the effect of Anonymity", "derivatives: Does real-ID mean higher-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean higher-quality answers?", "poor-quality questions and answers are from pseudonyms; whether due to inexperience or the", "* Does real-ID mean higher-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean higher-quality answers? ", "a [deleted question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)). Moderator ff524 mentioned, > > There are other sites that", " Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality answers? In", "purely on mathematics topics. With the following variables on anonymity in play (not", "But in general, poor-quality questions and answers are from pseudonyms; whether due to", "higher-quality questions? * Does real-ID mean higher-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality", "to measure the experience of the user to the SE model. *What is", "Anonymity on both questions and answers in [Academia specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be). In this particular case,", "to the user and can be used as a rough yardstick to measure", "mathematics topics. With the following variables on anonymity in play (not exactly rigorous,", "Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality answers? In my experience at the [Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users) as well", "all points. But this led me to think about the effects of Anonymity", "has an equivalent real-life ID associated, or a pseudonym. Effect: if real-life,", "an equivalent real-life ID associated, or a pseudonym. * Effect: if real-life, then", "With the following variables on anonymity in play (not exactly rigorous, but will", "like answering high quality, on topic questions*. But some of our users enjoy", "SE sites, specifically [Mathematics SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi). But purely on mathematics topics. With the following", "enjoy contributing to those other sites, too ;) > > > Emphasis mine.", "Does real-ID mean lower-quality questions? Does real-ID mean lower-quality answers? * Does", "quality, on topic questions. But some of our users enjoy contributing to those", "in its moderation policy, because we try to be a *home for people", "users from both sites whether with a pseudonym or real-ID. But in general,", ";) > > > Emphasis mine. I agree with Moderator ff524 on all", "real-life ID associated, or a pseudonym. Effect: if real-life, then words said", "following variables on anonymity in play (not exactly rigorous, but will suffice in", "* Effect: if real-life, then words said would carry over to their IRL", "buffer between the two. [Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation): * Integer: based upon a voting system reflected", "sites whether with a pseudonym or real-ID. But in general, poor-quality questions and", "moderation policy, because we try to be a home for people who like", "identity. If pseudonym, then there is a degree of buffer between the two.", "the experience of the user to the SE model. *What is the effect", "pseudonym or real-ID. But in general, poor-quality questions and answers are from pseudonyms;", "and his/her real-life identity) offered by a pseudonym. I could be entirely wrong", "and moderator ff524 about a [deleted question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)). Moderator ff524 mentioned, > > There", "Moderator ff524 on all points. But this led me to think about the", "Binary: has an equivalent real-life ID associated, or a pseudonym. Effect: if", "pseudonyms mean lower-quality answers? In my experience at the [Workplace](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/users) as well as", "SE model. What is the effect of Anonymity on both the quality of", "specifically [Mathematics SE](https://math.stackexchange.com/users/488215/nexusoi). But purely on mathematics topics. With the following variables on", "[Academia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users), I would presume that Anonymity has a role to play, but not", "about moderation - Reddit, etc. SE is deliberately different in its moderation policy,", "IRL identity. If pseudonym, then there is a degree of buffer between the", "think about the effects of Anonymity on both questions and answers in [Academia", "questions? * Does real-ID mean higher-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms mean higher-quality questions?", "if real-life, then words said would carry over to their IRL identity. If", "Effect: if real-life, then words said would carry over to their IRL identity.", "both questions and answers in [Academia specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be). In this particular case, the [author", "In a [short discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3873/allowing-questions-that-warranted-a-deletion-but-has-an-answer-that-addresses-t) between myself and moderator ff524 about a [deleted question](http://There%20are%20other%20sites%20that%20are%20not%20as%20strict%20about%20moderation%20-%20Reddit,%20etc.%20SE%20is%20deliberately%20different%20in%20its%20moderation%20policy,%20because%20we%20try%20to%20be%20a%20home%20for%20people%20who%20like%20answering%20high%20quality,%20on%20topic%20questions.%20But%20some%20of%20our%20users%20enjoy%20contributing%20to%20those%20other%20sites,%20too%20;)).", "the following variables on anonymity in play (not exactly rigorous, but will suffice", "exactly rigorous, but will suffice in the meantime): [Anonymity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/107152/encouraging-users-to-create-an-account-and-keep-it/107163#107163): * Binary: has an", "Anonymity on both the quality of questions and answers?** The various logical derivatives:", "answers in [Academia specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be). In this particular case, the [author of the deleted", "their IRL identity. If pseudonym, then there is a degree of buffer between", "up on a user's contribution. * Effect: more privileges and respect afforded to", "I agree with Moderator ff524 on all points. But this led me to", "lower-quality answers? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality", "whether due to inexperience or the buffer (between a person's actions and his/her", "user to the SE model. *What is the effect of Anonymity on both", "real-ID mean lower-quality answers? Does pseudonyms mean lower-quality questions? * Does pseudonyms", "offered by a pseudonym. I could be entirely wrong after all, would someone", "on both questions and answers in [Academia specifically](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1422/what-do-we-want-academia-se-to-be). In this particular case, the", "entirely wrong after all, would someone with more expertise on the matter care", "degree of buffer between the two. [Reputation](https://stackoverflow.com/help/whats-reputation): * Integer: based upon a voting" ]
[ "I desire my donation to be specific to the Academia site and not", "the Academia site and not to the whole of Stack Exchange. Please advise,", "uncle passed away and left me with a rather large inheritance, much of", "large inheritance, much of which I do not anticipate ever having a need", "not anticipate ever having a need for. How can I donate money -", "Recently my uncle passed away and left me with a rather large inheritance,", "a need for. How can I donate money - in USD - to", "Stack Exchange - its employees, top contributors, and moderators? Note that I desire", "can I donate money - in USD - to Academia Stack Exchange -", "to the Academia site and not to the whole of Stack Exchange. Please", "inheritance, much of which I do not anticipate ever having a need for.", "having a need for. How can I donate money - in USD -", "- to Academia Stack Exchange - its employees, top contributors, and moderators? Note", "employees, top contributors, and moderators? Note that I desire my donation to be", "and moderators? Note that I desire my donation to be specific to the", "in USD - to Academia Stack Exchange - its employees, top contributors, and", "- its employees, top contributors, and moderators? Note that I desire my donation", "to Academia Stack Exchange - its employees, top contributors, and moderators? Note that", "left me with a rather large inheritance, much of which I do not", "that I desire my donation to be specific to the Academia site and", "with a rather large inheritance, much of which I do not anticipate ever", "donation to be specific to the Academia site and not to the whole", "do not anticipate ever having a need for. How can I donate money", "Academia site and not to the whole of Stack Exchange. Please advise, and", "site and not to the whole of Stack Exchange. Please advise, and thank", "of which I do not anticipate ever having a need for. How can", "How can I donate money - in USD - to Academia Stack Exchange", "moderators? Note that I desire my donation to be specific to the Academia", "which I do not anticipate ever having a need for. How can I", "need for. How can I donate money - in USD - to Academia", "donate money - in USD - to Academia Stack Exchange - its employees,", "top contributors, and moderators? Note that I desire my donation to be specific", "contributors, and moderators? Note that I desire my donation to be specific to", "my uncle passed away and left me with a rather large inheritance, much", "money - in USD - to Academia Stack Exchange - its employees, top", "anticipate ever having a need for. How can I donate money - in", "USD - to Academia Stack Exchange - its employees, top contributors, and moderators?", "rather large inheritance, much of which I do not anticipate ever having a", "be specific to the Academia site and not to the whole of Stack", "my donation to be specific to the Academia site and not to the", "and not to the whole of Stack Exchange. Please advise, and thank you.", "to be specific to the Academia site and not to the whole of", "Note that I desire my donation to be specific to the Academia site", "me with a rather large inheritance, much of which I do not anticipate", "ever having a need for. How can I donate money - in USD", "desire my donation to be specific to the Academia site and not to", "away and left me with a rather large inheritance, much of which I", "for. How can I donate money - in USD - to Academia Stack", "much of which I do not anticipate ever having a need for. How", "I do not anticipate ever having a need for. How can I donate", "Academia Stack Exchange - its employees, top contributors, and moderators? Note that I", "its employees, top contributors, and moderators? Note that I desire my donation to", "I donate money - in USD - to Academia Stack Exchange - its", "a rather large inheritance, much of which I do not anticipate ever having", "- in USD - to Academia Stack Exchange - its employees, top contributors,", "and left me with a rather large inheritance, much of which I do", "passed away and left me with a rather large inheritance, much of which", "Exchange - its employees, top contributors, and moderators? Note that I desire my", "specific to the Academia site and not to the whole of Stack Exchange." ]
[ "many sites mark \"Homework\" questions, but it also feels a little snarky. So", "and to use the > tiniest tidbits, such as the removal of portraits,", "signs to try to understand > what was happening in internal Soviet politics.", "the Cold War, lack of reliable information about the country > forced Western", "the pages of the > party newspaper Pravda and other indirect signs to", "lot of questions like this - trying to suss out what a professor", "it also feels a little snarky. So I thought I'd pose the concept", "what a professor is thinking based on a one-line email, or what being", "of articles on the pages of the > party newspaper Pravda and other", "Editor\" at a journal means after 7 days. I've often thought it would", "but it also feels a little snarky. So I thought I'd pose the", "to suss out what a professor is thinking based on a one-line email,", "understand > what was happening in internal Soviet politics. > > > We", "to categorize these to help find duplicates, or mark them in the way", "on the pages of the > party newspaper Pravda and other indirect signs", "> tiniest tidbits, such as the removal of portraits, the rearranging of >", "them in the way many sites mark \"Homework\" questions, but it also feels", "definition, from Wikipedia: > > During the Cold War, lack of reliable information", "or small initial letters in phrases such as > \"First Secretary\", the arrangement", "> We get a lot of questions like this - trying to suss", "Square, > the choice of capital or small initial letters in phrases such", "like this - trying to suss out what a professor is thinking based", "the removal of portraits, the rearranging of > chairs, positions at the reviewing", "or mark them in the way many sites mark \"Homework\" questions, but it", "First, a definition, from Wikipedia: > > During the Cold War, lack of", "to use the > tiniest tidbits, such as the removal of portraits, the", "the country > forced Western analysts to \"read between the lines\" and to", "7 days. I've often thought it would be useful to be able to", "this - trying to suss out what a professor is thinking based on", "newspaper Pravda and other indirect signs to try to understand > what was", "find duplicates, or mark them in the way many sites mark \"Homework\" questions,", "\"With Editor\" at a journal means after 7 days. I've often thought it", "being \"With Editor\" at a journal means after 7 days. I've often thought", "also feels a little snarky. So I thought I'd pose the concept as", "the lines\" and to use the > tiniest tidbits, such as the removal", "such as the removal of portraits, the rearranging of > chairs, positions at", "lines\" and to use the > tiniest tidbits, such as the removal of", "the way many sites mark \"Homework\" questions, but it also feels a little", "Wikipedia: > > During the Cold War, lack of reliable information about the", "on a one-line email, or what being \"With Editor\" at a journal means", "initial letters in phrases such as > \"First Secretary\", the arrangement of articles", "forced Western analysts to \"read between the lines\" and to use the >", "We get a lot of questions like this - trying to suss out", "mark \"Homework\" questions, but it also feels a little snarky. So I thought", "Cold War, lack of reliable information about the country > forced Western analysts", "a one-line email, or what being \"With Editor\" at a journal means after", "as the removal of portraits, the rearranging of > chairs, positions at the", "portraits, the rearranging of > chairs, positions at the reviewing stand for parades", "> > > We get a lot of questions like this - trying", "> > We get a lot of questions like this - trying to", "reliable information about the country > forced Western analysts to \"read between the", "in Red Square, > the choice of capital or small initial letters in", "a professor is thinking based on a one-line email, or what being \"With", "Soviet politics. > > > We get a lot of questions like this", "and other indirect signs to try to understand > what was happening in", "reviewing stand for parades in Red Square, > the choice of capital or", "use the > tiniest tidbits, such as the removal of portraits, the rearranging", "Red Square, > the choice of capital or small initial letters in phrases", "useful to be able to categorize these to help find duplicates, or mark", "Pravda and other indirect signs to try to understand > what was happening", "- trying to suss out what a professor is thinking based on a", "at a journal means after 7 days. I've often thought it would be", "During the Cold War, lack of reliable information about the country > forced", "means after 7 days. I've often thought it would be useful to be", "lack of reliable information about the country > forced Western analysts to \"read", "happening in internal Soviet politics. > > > We get a lot of", "the > party newspaper Pravda and other indirect signs to try to understand", "the rearranging of > chairs, positions at the reviewing stand for parades in", "of portraits, the rearranging of > chairs, positions at the reviewing stand for", "to help find duplicates, or mark them in the way many sites mark", "\"Homework\" questions, but it also feels a little snarky. So I thought I'd", "articles on the pages of the > party newspaper Pravda and other indirect", "after 7 days. I've often thought it would be useful to be able", "chairs, positions at the reviewing stand for parades in Red Square, > the", "one-line email, or what being \"With Editor\" at a journal means after 7", "to be able to categorize these to help find duplicates, or mark them", "> the choice of capital or small initial letters in phrases such as", "the > tiniest tidbits, such as the removal of portraits, the rearranging of", "in the way many sites mark \"Homework\" questions, but it also feels a", "positions at the reviewing stand for parades in Red Square, > the choice", "sites mark \"Homework\" questions, but it also feels a little snarky. So I", "tidbits, such as the removal of portraits, the rearranging of > chairs, positions", "I've often thought it would be useful to be able to categorize these", "suss out what a professor is thinking based on a one-line email, or", "to try to understand > what was happening in internal Soviet politics. >", "> \"First Secretary\", the arrangement of articles on the pages of the >", "thought it would be useful to be able to categorize these to help", "the arrangement of articles on the pages of the > party newspaper Pravda", "letters in phrases such as > \"First Secretary\", the arrangement of articles on", "Western analysts to \"read between the lines\" and to use the > tiniest", "what was happening in internal Soviet politics. > > > We get a", "> chairs, positions at the reviewing stand for parades in Red Square, >", "questions, but it also feels a little snarky. So I thought I'd pose", "party newspaper Pravda and other indirect signs to try to understand > what", "thinking based on a one-line email, or what being \"With Editor\" at a", "was happening in internal Soviet politics. > > > We get a lot", "stand for parades in Red Square, > the choice of capital or small", "a little snarky. So I thought I'd pose the concept as a discussion.", "for parades in Red Square, > the choice of capital or small initial", "Secretary\", the arrangement of articles on the pages of the > party newspaper", "would be useful to be able to categorize these to help find duplicates,", "politics. > > > We get a lot of questions like this -", "of questions like this - trying to suss out what a professor is", "information about the country > forced Western analysts to \"read between the lines\"", "email, or what being \"With Editor\" at a journal means after 7 days.", "often thought it would be useful to be able to categorize these to", "to \"read between the lines\" and to use the > tiniest tidbits, such", "such as > \"First Secretary\", the arrangement of articles on the pages of", "trying to suss out what a professor is thinking based on a one-line", "capital or small initial letters in phrases such as > \"First Secretary\", the", "in phrases such as > \"First Secretary\", the arrangement of articles on the", "of the > party newspaper Pravda and other indirect signs to try to", "professor is thinking based on a one-line email, or what being \"With Editor\"", "rearranging of > chairs, positions at the reviewing stand for parades in Red", "> > During the Cold War, lack of reliable information about the country", "arrangement of articles on the pages of the > party newspaper Pravda and", "tiniest tidbits, such as the removal of portraits, the rearranging of > chairs,", "the choice of capital or small initial letters in phrases such as >", "other indirect signs to try to understand > what was happening in internal", "a journal means after 7 days. I've often thought it would be useful", "War, lack of reliable information about the country > forced Western analysts to", "choice of capital or small initial letters in phrases such as > \"First", "or what being \"With Editor\" at a journal means after 7 days. I've", "country > forced Western analysts to \"read between the lines\" and to use", "help find duplicates, or mark them in the way many sites mark \"Homework\"", "is thinking based on a one-line email, or what being \"With Editor\" at", "between the lines\" and to use the > tiniest tidbits, such as the", "duplicates, or mark them in the way many sites mark \"Homework\" questions, but", "a definition, from Wikipedia: > > During the Cold War, lack of reliable", "categorize these to help find duplicates, or mark them in the way many", "feels a little snarky. So I thought I'd pose the concept as a", "able to categorize these to help find duplicates, or mark them in the", "internal Soviet politics. > > > We get a lot of questions like", "what being \"With Editor\" at a journal means after 7 days. I've often", "the reviewing stand for parades in Red Square, > the choice of capital", "be useful to be able to categorize these to help find duplicates, or", "days. I've often thought it would be useful to be able to categorize", "small initial letters in phrases such as > \"First Secretary\", the arrangement of", "> what was happening in internal Soviet politics. > > > We get", "get a lot of questions like this - trying to suss out what", "it would be useful to be able to categorize these to help find", "phrases such as > \"First Secretary\", the arrangement of articles on the pages", "> party newspaper Pravda and other indirect signs to try to understand >", "questions like this - trying to suss out what a professor is thinking", "be able to categorize these to help find duplicates, or mark them in", "out what a professor is thinking based on a one-line email, or what", "try to understand > what was happening in internal Soviet politics. > >", "indirect signs to try to understand > what was happening in internal Soviet", "journal means after 7 days. I've often thought it would be useful to", "from Wikipedia: > > During the Cold War, lack of reliable information about", "way many sites mark \"Homework\" questions, but it also feels a little snarky.", "based on a one-line email, or what being \"With Editor\" at a journal", "of reliable information about the country > forced Western analysts to \"read between", "mark them in the way many sites mark \"Homework\" questions, but it also", "pages of the > party newspaper Pravda and other indirect signs to try", "in internal Soviet politics. > > > We get a lot of questions", "as > \"First Secretary\", the arrangement of articles on the pages of the", "analysts to \"read between the lines\" and to use the > tiniest tidbits,", "parades in Red Square, > the choice of capital or small initial letters", "> During the Cold War, lack of reliable information about the country >", "a lot of questions like this - trying to suss out what a", "removal of portraits, the rearranging of > chairs, positions at the reviewing stand", "about the country > forced Western analysts to \"read between the lines\" and", "of > chairs, positions at the reviewing stand for parades in Red Square,", "\"First Secretary\", the arrangement of articles on the pages of the > party", "to understand > what was happening in internal Soviet politics. > > >", "these to help find duplicates, or mark them in the way many sites", "of capital or small initial letters in phrases such as > \"First Secretary\",", "at the reviewing stand for parades in Red Square, > the choice of", "\"read between the lines\" and to use the > tiniest tidbits, such as", "> forced Western analysts to \"read between the lines\" and to use the" ]
[ "identifying the answer was bad. There's an obvious problem when the comments on", "There's an obvious problem when the comments on why the answer was bad", "on exams?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99417/how-to-prevent-students-from-using-modified-calculators-to-cheat-on-exams) We had a (now-deleted) answer to this question that was at", "both miss the point. There is no problem with deleting the answer. There", "at +28 with the author requesting that it be un-accepted so he could", "On the other hand, the comments explaining how it was bad had been", "the answer was bad. There's an obvious problem when the comments on why", "wrong? Two answers; both miss the point. There is no problem with deleting", "that it be un-accepted so he could delete it. On the other hand,", "its badness. But the answer downvotes didn't come. What have we done wrong?", "the votes in the comments were logically outweighing the votes in the answer", "cheat on exams?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99417/how-to-prevent-students-from-using-modified-calculators-to-cheat-on-exams) We had a (now-deleted) answer to this question that was", "votes in the answer showing its badness. But the answer downvotes didn't come.", "comments on why the answer was bad got more upvotes than the answer", "the votes in the answer showing its badness. But the answer downvotes didn't", "come. What have we done wrong? Two answers; both miss the point. There", "known bad, and yet yielding upvotes, but the votes in the comments were", "but the votes in the comments were logically outweighing the votes in the", "answers; both miss the point. There is no problem with deleting the answer.", "hand, the comments explaining how it was bad had been upvoted to the", "done wrong? Two answers; both miss the point. There is no problem with", "calculators to cheat on exams?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99417/how-to-prevent-students-from-using-modified-calculators-to-cheat-on-exams) We had a (now-deleted) answer to this question", "the fifties. This is not the behavior voting should result in. The answer", "prevent students from using modified calculators to cheat on exams?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99417/how-to-prevent-students-from-using-modified-calculators-to-cheat-on-exams) We had a", "and yet yielding upvotes, but the votes in the comments were logically outweighing", "with deleting the answer. There is no problem taking awhile in identifying the", "the answer. There is no problem taking awhile in identifying the answer was", "this question that was at +28 with the author requesting that it be", "deleting the answer. There is no problem taking awhile in identifying the answer", "yielding upvotes, but the votes in the comments were logically outweighing the votes", "was bad had been upvoted to the fifties. This is not the behavior", "the answer downvotes didn't come. What have we done wrong? Two answers; both", "result in. The answer was known bad, and yet yielding upvotes, but the", "the point. There is no problem with deleting the answer. There is no", "outweighing the votes in the answer showing its badness. But the answer downvotes", "bad had been upvoted to the fifties. This is not the behavior voting", "+28 with the author requesting that it be un-accepted so he could delete", "an obvious problem when the comments on why the answer was bad got", "obvious problem when the comments on why the answer was bad got more", "how it was bad had been upvoted to the fifties. This is not", "comments explaining how it was bad had been upvoted to the fifties. This", "to prevent students from using modified calculators to cheat on exams?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99417/how-to-prevent-students-from-using-modified-calculators-to-cheat-on-exams) We had", "the comments explaining how it was bad had been upvoted to the fifties.", "the comments were logically outweighing the votes in the answer showing its badness.", "delete it. On the other hand, the comments explaining how it was bad", "There is no problem taking awhile in identifying the answer was bad. There's", "no problem taking awhile in identifying the answer was bad. There's an obvious", "author requesting that it be un-accepted so he could delete it. On the", "students from using modified calculators to cheat on exams?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99417/how-to-prevent-students-from-using-modified-calculators-to-cheat-on-exams) We had a (now-deleted)", "had a (now-deleted) answer to this question that was at +28 with the", "upvotes, but the votes in the comments were logically outweighing the votes in", "is not the behavior voting should result in. The answer was known bad,", "didn't come. What have we done wrong? Two answers; both miss the point.", "bad got more upvotes than the answer ever did and the answer is", "problem taking awhile in identifying the answer was bad. There's an obvious problem", "badness. But the answer downvotes didn't come. What have we done wrong? Two", "in the comments were logically outweighing the votes in the answer showing its", "when the comments on why the answer was bad got more upvotes than", "modified calculators to cheat on exams?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99417/how-to-prevent-students-from-using-modified-calculators-to-cheat-on-exams) We had a (now-deleted) answer to this", "What have we done wrong? Two answers; both miss the point. There is", "got more upvotes than the answer ever did and the answer is still", "taking awhile in identifying the answer was bad. There's an obvious problem when", "question that was at +28 with the author requesting that it be un-accepted", "problem when the comments on why the answer was bad got more upvotes", "have we done wrong? Two answers; both miss the point. There is no", "was at +28 with the author requesting that it be un-accepted so he", "in the answer showing its badness. But the answer downvotes didn't come. What", "he could delete it. On the other hand, the comments explaining how it", "awhile in identifying the answer was bad. There's an obvious problem when the", "should result in. The answer was known bad, and yet yielding upvotes, but", "to cheat on exams?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99417/how-to-prevent-students-from-using-modified-calculators-to-cheat-on-exams) We had a (now-deleted) answer to this question that", "miss the point. There is no problem with deleting the answer. There is", "upvoted to the fifties. This is not the behavior voting should result in.", "was known bad, and yet yielding upvotes, but the votes in the comments", "votes in the comments were logically outweighing the votes in the answer showing", "exams?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99417/how-to-prevent-students-from-using-modified-calculators-to-cheat-on-exams) We had a (now-deleted) answer to this question that was at +28", "no problem with deleting the answer. There is no problem taking awhile in", "voting should result in. The answer was known bad, and yet yielding upvotes,", "the answer was bad got more upvotes than the answer ever did and", "downvotes didn't come. What have we done wrong? Two answers; both miss the", "it. On the other hand, the comments explaining how it was bad had", "yet yielding upvotes, but the votes in the comments were logically outweighing the", "so he could delete it. On the other hand, the comments explaining how", "the behavior voting should result in. The answer was known bad, and yet", "comments were logically outweighing the votes in the answer showing its badness. But", "in identifying the answer was bad. There's an obvious problem when the comments", "was bad got more upvotes than the answer ever did and the answer", "with the author requesting that it be un-accepted so he could delete it.", "it was bad had been upvoted to the fifties. This is not the", "answer downvotes didn't come. What have we done wrong? Two answers; both miss", "logically outweighing the votes in the answer showing its badness. But the answer", "(now-deleted) answer to this question that was at +28 with the author requesting", "it be un-accepted so he could delete it. On the other hand, the", "was bad. There's an obvious problem when the comments on why the answer", "be un-accepted so he could delete it. On the other hand, the comments", "could delete it. On the other hand, the comments explaining how it was", "more upvotes than the answer ever did and the answer is still net", "is no problem with deleting the answer. There is no problem taking awhile", "un-accepted so he could delete it. On the other hand, the comments explaining", "been upvoted to the fifties. This is not the behavior voting should result", "problem with deleting the answer. There is no problem taking awhile in identifying", "bad. There's an obvious problem when the comments on why the answer was", "fifties. This is not the behavior voting should result in. The answer was", "to the fifties. This is not the behavior voting should result in. The", "answer was bad. There's an obvious problem when the comments on why the", "answer was bad got more upvotes than the answer ever did and the", "the answer showing its badness. But the answer downvotes didn't come. What have", "the author requesting that it be un-accepted so he could delete it. On", "in. The answer was known bad, and yet yielding upvotes, but the votes", "than the answer ever did and the answer is still net highly upvoted.", "is no problem taking awhile in identifying the answer was bad. There's an", "were logically outweighing the votes in the answer showing its badness. But the", "that was at +28 with the author requesting that it be un-accepted so", "using modified calculators to cheat on exams?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99417/how-to-prevent-students-from-using-modified-calculators-to-cheat-on-exams) We had a (now-deleted) answer to", "explaining how it was bad had been upvoted to the fifties. This is", "bad, and yet yielding upvotes, but the votes in the comments were logically", "point. There is no problem with deleting the answer. There is no problem", "on why the answer was bad got more upvotes than the answer ever", "we done wrong? Two answers; both miss the point. There is no problem", "answer. There is no problem taking awhile in identifying the answer was bad.", "behavior voting should result in. The answer was known bad, and yet yielding", "the comments on why the answer was bad got more upvotes than the", "to this question that was at +28 with the author requesting that it", "why the answer was bad got more upvotes than the answer ever did", "[How to prevent students from using modified calculators to cheat on exams?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99417/how-to-prevent-students-from-using-modified-calculators-to-cheat-on-exams) We", "showing its badness. But the answer downvotes didn't come. What have we done", "There is no problem with deleting the answer. There is no problem taking", "a (now-deleted) answer to this question that was at +28 with the author", "the other hand, the comments explaining how it was bad had been upvoted", "had been upvoted to the fifties. This is not the behavior voting should", "This is not the behavior voting should result in. The answer was known", "requesting that it be un-accepted so he could delete it. On the other", "answer was known bad, and yet yielding upvotes, but the votes in the", "But the answer downvotes didn't come. What have we done wrong? Two answers;", "from using modified calculators to cheat on exams?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99417/how-to-prevent-students-from-using-modified-calculators-to-cheat-on-exams) We had a (now-deleted) answer", "answer showing its badness. But the answer downvotes didn't come. What have we", "upvotes than the answer ever did and the answer is still net highly", "not the behavior voting should result in. The answer was known bad, and", "We had a (now-deleted) answer to this question that was at +28 with", "The answer was known bad, and yet yielding upvotes, but the votes in", "other hand, the comments explaining how it was bad had been upvoted to", "Two answers; both miss the point. There is no problem with deleting the", "answer to this question that was at +28 with the author requesting that" ]
[ "E.g., CNRS, which [employs 11k](http://www.cnrs.fr/en/aboutcnrs/key-figures.htm) researchers. (As a comparison, Harvard has [~5k academics](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvard_University).)", "particularly large institutes? E.g., CNRS, which [employs 11k](http://www.cnrs.fr/en/aboutcnrs/key-figures.htm) researchers. (As a comparison, Harvard", "some particularly large institutes? E.g., CNRS, which [employs 11k](http://www.cnrs.fr/en/aboutcnrs/key-figures.htm) researchers. (As a comparison,", "can questions be asked about some particularly large institutes? E.g., CNRS, which [employs", "if you're asking about a particular institution...it's likely your question is too limited", "asked about some particularly large institutes? E.g., CNRS, which [employs 11k](http://www.cnrs.fr/en/aboutcnrs/key-figures.htm) researchers. (As", "likely your question is too limited in scope > > > Can this", "in scope > > > Can this rule be made more precise? In", "limited in scope > > > Can this rule be made more precise?", "state: > > As a general rule, if you're asking about a particular", "asking about a particular institution...it's likely your question is too limited in scope", "too limited in scope > > > Can this rule be made more", "In particular, can questions be asked about some particularly large institutes? E.g., CNRS,", "general rule, if you're asking about a particular institution...it's likely your question is", "about a particular institution...it's likely your question is too limited in scope >", "institution...it's likely your question is too limited in scope > > > Can", "more precise? In particular, can questions be asked about some particularly large institutes?", "your question is too limited in scope > > > Can this rule", "guidelines state: > > As a general rule, if you're asking about a", "is too limited in scope > > > Can this rule be made", "> > Can this rule be made more precise? In particular, can questions", "made more precise? In particular, can questions be asked about some particularly large", "questions be asked about some particularly large institutes? E.g., CNRS, which [employs 11k](http://www.cnrs.fr/en/aboutcnrs/key-figures.htm)", "particular, can questions be asked about some particularly large institutes? E.g., CNRS, which", "> > As a general rule, if you're asking about a particular institution...it's", "> As a general rule, if you're asking about a particular institution...it's likely", "large institutes? E.g., CNRS, which [employs 11k](http://www.cnrs.fr/en/aboutcnrs/key-figures.htm) researchers. (As a comparison, Harvard has", "scope > > > Can this rule be made more precise? In particular,", "precise? In particular, can questions be asked about some particularly large institutes? E.g.,", "> Can this rule be made more precise? In particular, can questions be", "about some particularly large institutes? E.g., CNRS, which [employs 11k](http://www.cnrs.fr/en/aboutcnrs/key-figures.htm) researchers. (As a", "Can this rule be made more precise? In particular, can questions be asked", "a particular institution...it's likely your question is too limited in scope > >", "a general rule, if you're asking about a particular institution...it's likely your question", "question is too limited in scope > > > Can this rule be", "rule, if you're asking about a particular institution...it's likely your question is too", "particular institution...it's likely your question is too limited in scope > > >", "be asked about some particularly large institutes? E.g., CNRS, which [employs 11k](http://www.cnrs.fr/en/aboutcnrs/key-figures.htm) researchers.", "institutes? E.g., CNRS, which [employs 11k](http://www.cnrs.fr/en/aboutcnrs/key-figures.htm) researchers. (As a comparison, Harvard has [~5k", "The guidelines state: > > As a general rule, if you're asking about", "rule be made more precise? In particular, can questions be asked about some", "be made more precise? In particular, can questions be asked about some particularly", "this rule be made more precise? In particular, can questions be asked about", "As a general rule, if you're asking about a particular institution...it's likely your", "you're asking about a particular institution...it's likely your question is too limited in", "> > > Can this rule be made more precise? In particular, can" ]
[ "I had to deal with a vindictive user who fought teeth and nails", "\"unclear\". I am truly at a loss regarding what is supposedly unclear about", "it was a single small research center instead of a national institution which", "the application process at the CNRS has been \"put on hold\" for being", "visible reason with no explanation from the people who did it. Two different", "is \"put on hold\" for no visible reason with no explanation from the", "people in most French labs, even opening [a meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions) on which I", "at it and saw nothing wrong with it, but all it apparently takes", "at the CNRS has been \"put on hold\" for being \"unclear\". I am", "no visible reason with no explanation from the people who did it. Two", "meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions) on which I can't even comment. And now my question is", "detail, their length, their structure. I'm struggling to find a way to put", "supposedly unclear about it. I'm asking what is expected about the reports on", "been less than stellar. First I had to deal with a vindictive user", "institution which employs and funds people in most French labs, even opening [a", "it, but all it apparently takes is five random users to deem my", "fought teeth and nails because they did not know what CNRS is and", "funds people in most French labs, even opening [a meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions) on which", "a single small research center instead of a national institution which employs and", "has been \"put on hold\" for being \"unclear\". I am truly at a", "Two different moderators looked at it and saw nothing wrong with it, but", "less than stellar. First I had to deal with a vindictive user who", "expected about the reports on past and projected work: their level of detail,", "of asking a question on this website has been less than stellar. First", "now my question is \"put on hold\" for no visible reason with no", "length, their structure. I'm struggling to find a way to put this in", "people who did it. Two different moderators looked at it and saw nothing", "for no visible reason with no explanation from the people who did it.", "the reports on past and projected work: their level of detail, their length,", "takes is five random users to deem my question \"unclear\", presumably because they,", "different moderators looked at it and saw nothing wrong with it, but all", "teeth and nails because they did not know what CNRS is and thought", "nothing wrong with it, but all it apparently takes is five random users", "website has been less than stellar. First I had to deal with a", "unclear about it. I'm asking what is expected about the reports on past", "not know what CNRS is and thought it was a single small research", "on hold\" for no visible reason with no explanation from the people who", "on which I can't even comment. And now my question is \"put on", "center instead of a national institution which employs and funds people in most", "\"unclear\", presumably because they, too, don't even know what the question is about", "can't even comment. And now my question is \"put on hold\" for no", "has been less than stellar. First I had to deal with a vindictive", "question on this website has been less than stellar. First I had to", "stellar. First I had to deal with a vindictive user who fought teeth", "this website has been less than stellar. First I had to deal with", "CNRS is and thought it was a single small research center instead of", "I'm asking what is expected about the reports on past and projected work:", "which employs and funds people in most French labs, even opening [a meta", "words. To be quite honest the experience of asking a question on this", "nails because they did not know what CNRS is and thought it was", "I'm struggling to find a way to put this in simpler words. To", "apparently takes is five random users to deem my question \"unclear\", presumably because", "labs, even opening [a meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions) on which I can't even comment. And", "regarding what is supposedly unclear about it. I'm asking what is expected about", "work: their level of detail, their length, their structure. I'm struggling to find", "loss regarding what is supposedly unclear about it. I'm asking what is expected", "to deal with a vindictive user who fought teeth and nails because they", "experience of asking a question on this website has been less than stellar.", "about the reports on past and projected work: their level of detail, their", "with no explanation from the people who did it. Two different moderators looked", "for being \"unclear\". I am truly at a loss regarding what is supposedly", "my question \"unclear\", presumably because they, too, don't even know what the question", "their level of detail, their length, their structure. I'm struggling to find a", "with it, but all it apparently takes is five random users to deem", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions) on which I can't even comment. And now my question is \"put", "than stellar. First I had to deal with a vindictive user who fought", "with a vindictive user who fought teeth and nails because they did not", "small research center instead of a national institution which employs and funds people", "national institution which employs and funds people in most French labs, even opening", "instead of a national institution which employs and funds people in most French", "what is supposedly unclear about it. I'm asking what is expected about the", "[a meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions) on which I can't even comment. And now my question", "looked at it and saw nothing wrong with it, but all it apparently", "asking a question on this website has been less than stellar. First I", "research center instead of a national institution which employs and funds people in", "single small research center instead of a national institution which employs and funds", "it and saw nothing wrong with it, but all it apparently takes is", "find a way to put this in simpler words. To be quite honest", "a question on this website has been less than stellar. First I had", "am truly at a loss regarding what is supposedly unclear about it. I'm", "about the application process at the CNRS has been \"put on hold\" for", "I can't even comment. And now my question is \"put on hold\" for", "comment. And now my question is \"put on hold\" for no visible reason", "way to put this in simpler words. To be quite honest the experience", "and saw nothing wrong with it, but all it apparently takes is five", "user who fought teeth and nails because they did not know what CNRS", "be quite honest the experience of asking a question on this website has", "and projected work: their level of detail, their length, their structure. I'm struggling", "structure. I'm struggling to find a way to put this in simpler words.", "been \"put on hold\" for being \"unclear\". I am truly at a loss", "I am truly at a loss regarding what is supposedly unclear about it.", "a way to put this in simpler words. To be quite honest the", "level of detail, their length, their structure. I'm struggling to find a way", "even comment. And now my question is \"put on hold\" for no visible", "don't even know what the question is about and should perhaps reserve their", "reports on past and projected work: their level of detail, their length, their", "users to deem my question \"unclear\", presumably because they, too, don't even know", "CNRS has been \"put on hold\" for being \"unclear\". I am truly at", "question is \"put on hold\" for no visible reason with no explanation from", "explanation from the people who did it. Two different moderators looked at it", "the people who did it. Two different moderators looked at it and saw", "it. Two different moderators looked at it and saw nothing wrong with it,", "what is expected about the reports on past and projected work: their level", "reason with no explanation from the people who did it. Two different moderators", "struggling to find a way to put this in simpler words. To be", "was a single small research center instead of a national institution which employs", "their length, their structure. I'm struggling to find a way to put this", "wrong with it, but all it apparently takes is five random users to", "thought it was a single small research center instead of a national institution", "moderators looked at it and saw nothing wrong with it, but all it", "to put this in simpler words. To be quite honest the experience of", "projected work: their level of detail, their length, their structure. I'm struggling to", "five random users to deem my question \"unclear\", presumably because they, too, don't", "in simpler words. To be quite honest the experience of asking a question", "is five random users to deem my question \"unclear\", presumably because they, too,", "being \"unclear\". I am truly at a loss regarding what is supposedly unclear", "no explanation from the people who did it. Two different moderators looked at", "honest the experience of asking a question on this website has been less", "this in simpler words. To be quite honest the experience of asking a", "is and thought it was a single small research center instead of a", "their structure. I'm struggling to find a way to put this in simpler", "even opening [a meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions) on which I can't even comment. And now", "which I can't even comment. And now my question is \"put on hold\"", "And now my question is \"put on hold\" for no visible reason with", "asking what is expected about the reports on past and projected work: their", "in most French labs, even opening [a meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions) on which I can't", "opening [a meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions) on which I can't even comment. And now my", "from the people who did it. Two different moderators looked at it and", "past and projected work: their level of detail, their length, their structure. I'm", "process at the CNRS has been \"put on hold\" for being \"unclear\". I", "\"put on hold\" for being \"unclear\". I am truly at a loss regarding", "to find a way to put this in simpler words. To be quite", "even know what the question is about and should perhaps reserve their judgment...", "simpler words. To be quite honest the experience of asking a question on", "To be quite honest the experience of asking a question on this website", "because they did not know what CNRS is and thought it was a", "application process at the CNRS has been \"put on hold\" for being \"unclear\".", "on past and projected work: their level of detail, their length, their structure.", "random users to deem my question \"unclear\", presumably because they, too, don't even", "presumably because they, too, don't even know what the question is about and", "truly at a loss regarding what is supposedly unclear about it. I'm asking", "on hold\" for being \"unclear\". I am truly at a loss regarding what", "of a national institution which employs and funds people in most French labs,", "about it. I'm asking what is expected about the reports on past and", "who did it. Two different moderators looked at it and saw nothing wrong", "put this in simpler words. To be quite honest the experience of asking", "of detail, their length, their structure. I'm struggling to find a way to", "quite honest the experience of asking a question on this website has been", "on this website has been less than stellar. First I had to deal", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100104/in-how-much-detail-should-one-describe-their-past-and-projected-future-work-for) about the application process at the CNRS has been \"put on hold\"", "did not know what CNRS is and thought it was a single small", "a national institution which employs and funds people in most French labs, even", "First I had to deal with a vindictive user who fought teeth and", "it apparently takes is five random users to deem my question \"unclear\", presumably", "French labs, even opening [a meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions) on which I can't even comment.", "a loss regarding what is supposedly unclear about it. I'm asking what is", "hold\" for no visible reason with no explanation from the people who did", "they, too, don't even know what the question is about and should perhaps", "vindictive user who fought teeth and nails because they did not know what", "and nails because they did not know what CNRS is and thought it", "know what CNRS is and thought it was a single small research center", "the CNRS has been \"put on hold\" for being \"unclear\". I am truly", "a vindictive user who fought teeth and nails because they did not know", "hold\" for being \"unclear\". I am truly at a loss regarding what is", "it. I'm asking what is expected about the reports on past and projected", "most French labs, even opening [a meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions) on which I can't even", "deal with a vindictive user who fought teeth and nails because they did", "had to deal with a vindictive user who fought teeth and nails because", "but all it apparently takes is five random users to deem my question", "saw nothing wrong with it, but all it apparently takes is five random", "employs and funds people in most French labs, even opening [a meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions)", "who fought teeth and nails because they did not know what CNRS is", "and funds people in most French labs, even opening [a meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3895/questions-about-particular-institutions) on", "deem my question \"unclear\", presumably because they, too, don't even know what the", "they did not know what CNRS is and thought it was a single", "[My question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100104/in-how-much-detail-should-one-describe-their-past-and-projected-future-work-for) about the application process at the CNRS has been \"put on", "did it. Two different moderators looked at it and saw nothing wrong with", "all it apparently takes is five random users to deem my question \"unclear\",", "at a loss regarding what is supposedly unclear about it. I'm asking what", "is supposedly unclear about it. I'm asking what is expected about the reports", "my question is \"put on hold\" for no visible reason with no explanation", "\"put on hold\" for no visible reason with no explanation from the people", "what CNRS is and thought it was a single small research center instead", "the experience of asking a question on this website has been less than", "to deem my question \"unclear\", presumably because they, too, don't even know what", "too, don't even know what the question is about and should perhaps reserve", "and thought it was a single small research center instead of a national", "question \"unclear\", presumably because they, too, don't even know what the question is", "because they, too, don't even know what the question is about and should", "is expected about the reports on past and projected work: their level of" ]
[ "many fellow academics and scientists, Sci-Hub is the first option, even when legal", "as an academic, I wanted to share my experience on when I would", "a copy of their published paper. Almost everyone will be happy to send", "published paper. Almost everyone will be happy to send you one. [...] >", "of their published paper. Almost everyone will be happy to send you one.", "I added a comment in line with: > > I would only write", "to the authors and ask for a copy of their published paper. Almost", "offensive, or rude. Would the moderators kindly justify the deletion? Wasn't it opinion-based?", "this [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100431/access-to-scientific-articles-that-cite-mine-after-leaving-academia), Federico Poloni's wrote an answer: > > You can write", "way unconstructive, offensive, or rude. Would the moderators kindly justify the deletion? Wasn't", "comment was deleted. It was by no way unconstructive, offensive, or rude. Would", "an academic, I wanted to share my experience on when I would use", "legal access exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone) Unfortunately, my comment was deleted. It was by no way", "a comment in line with: > > I would only write to the", "my comment was deleted. It was by no way unconstructive, offensive, or rude.", "very good answer. However, as an academic, I wanted to share my experience", "[For too many fellow academics and scientists, Sci-Hub is the first option, even", "only my choice. [For too many fellow academics and scientists, Sci-Hub is the", "I would only write to the authors if Sci-Hub dies. > > >", "the first option, even when legal access exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone) Unfortunately, my comment was deleted.", "is not only my choice. [For too many fellow academics and scientists, Sci-Hub", "fellow academics and scientists, Sci-Hub is the first option, even when legal access", "However, as an academic, I wanted to share my experience on when I", "is a very good answer. However, as an academic, I wanted to share", "Almost everyone will be happy to send you one. [...] > > >", "the suggested solution. I added a comment in line with: > > I", "can write an e-mail to the authors and ask for a copy of", "> which is a very good answer. However, as an academic, I wanted", "if Sci-Hub dies. > > > This is not only my choice. [For", "my choice. [For too many fellow academics and scientists, Sci-Hub is the first", "dies. > > > This is not only my choice. [For too many", "academics and scientists, Sci-Hub is the first option, even when legal access exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone)", "be happy to send you one. [...] > > > which is a", "authors if Sci-Hub dies. > > > This is not only my choice.", "share my experience on when I would use the suggested solution. I added", "experience on when I would use the suggested solution. I added a comment", "the authors and ask for a copy of their published paper. Almost everyone", "unconstructive, offensive, or rude. Would the moderators kindly justify the deletion? Wasn't it", "and scientists, Sci-Hub is the first option, even when legal access exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone) Unfortunately,", "It was by no way unconstructive, offensive, or rude. Would the moderators kindly", "only write to the authors if Sci-Hub dies. > > > This is", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100431/access-to-scientific-articles-that-cite-mine-after-leaving-academia), Federico Poloni's wrote an answer: > > You can write an e-mail", "an answer: > > You can write an e-mail to the authors and", "Poloni's wrote an answer: > > You can write an e-mail to the", "and ask for a copy of their published paper. Almost everyone will be", "answer. However, as an academic, I wanted to share my experience on when", "send you one. [...] > > > which is a very good answer.", "would only write to the authors if Sci-Hub dies. > > > This", "choice. [For too many fellow academics and scientists, Sci-Hub is the first option,", "answer: > > You can write an e-mail to the authors and ask", "write an e-mail to the authors and ask for a copy of their", "the authors if Sci-Hub dies. > > > This is not only my", "option, even when legal access exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone) Unfortunately, my comment was deleted. It was", "to the authors if Sci-Hub dies. > > > This is not only", "exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone) Unfortunately, my comment was deleted. It was by no way unconstructive, offensive,", "comment in line with: > > I would only write to the authors", "everyone will be happy to send you one. [...] > > > which", "You can write an e-mail to the authors and ask for a copy", "> > This is not only my choice. [For too many fellow academics", "will be happy to send you one. [...] > > > which is", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100431/access-to-scientific-articles-that-cite-mine-after-leaving-academia), Federico Poloni's wrote an answer: > > You can write an", "in line with: > > I would only write to the authors if", "Unfortunately, my comment was deleted. It was by no way unconstructive, offensive, or", "I wanted to share my experience on when I would use the suggested", "when I would use the suggested solution. I added a comment in line", "a very good answer. However, as an academic, I wanted to share my", "good answer. However, as an academic, I wanted to share my experience on", "Federico Poloni's wrote an answer: > > You can write an e-mail to", "> This is not only my choice. [For too many fellow academics and", "I would use the suggested solution. I added a comment in line with:", "wrote an answer: > > You can write an e-mail to the authors", "> I would only write to the authors if Sci-Hub dies. > >", "too many fellow academics and scientists, Sci-Hub is the first option, even when", "write to the authors if Sci-Hub dies. > > > This is not", "deleted. It was by no way unconstructive, offensive, or rude. Would the moderators", "line with: > > I would only write to the authors if Sci-Hub", "> > > This is not only my choice. [For too many fellow", "even when legal access exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone) Unfortunately, my comment was deleted. It was by", "added a comment in line with: > > I would only write to", "In this [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100431/access-to-scientific-articles-that-cite-mine-after-leaving-academia), Federico Poloni's wrote an answer: > > You can", "to send you one. [...] > > > which is a very good", "e-mail to the authors and ask for a copy of their published paper.", "on when I would use the suggested solution. I added a comment in", "Sci-Hub is the first option, even when legal access exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone) Unfortunately, my comment", "was deleted. It was by no way unconstructive, offensive, or rude. Would the", "suggested solution. I added a comment in line with: > > I would", "their published paper. Almost everyone will be happy to send you one. [...]", "an e-mail to the authors and ask for a copy of their published", "access exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone) Unfortunately, my comment was deleted. It was by no way unconstructive,", "> > > which is a very good answer. However, as an academic,", "wanted to share my experience on when I would use the suggested solution.", "solution. I added a comment in line with: > > I would only", "use the suggested solution. I added a comment in line with: > >", "happy to send you one. [...] > > > which is a very", "authors and ask for a copy of their published paper. Almost everyone will", "[...] > > > which is a very good answer. However, as an", "would use the suggested solution. I added a comment in line with: >", "first option, even when legal access exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone) Unfortunately, my comment was deleted. It", "my experience on when I would use the suggested solution. I added a", "Sci-Hub dies. > > > This is not only my choice. [For too", "with: > > I would only write to the authors if Sci-Hub dies.", "> > You can write an e-mail to the authors and ask for", "This is not only my choice. [For too many fellow academics and scientists,", "ask for a copy of their published paper. Almost everyone will be happy", "one. [...] > > > which is a very good answer. However, as", "scientists, Sci-Hub is the first option, even when legal access exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone) Unfortunately, my", "was by no way unconstructive, offensive, or rude. Would the moderators kindly justify", "paper. Almost everyone will be happy to send you one. [...] > >", "no way unconstructive, offensive, or rude. Would the moderators kindly justify the deletion?", "not only my choice. [For too many fellow academics and scientists, Sci-Hub is", "for a copy of their published paper. Almost everyone will be happy to", "by no way unconstructive, offensive, or rude. Would the moderators kindly justify the", "which is a very good answer. However, as an academic, I wanted to", "copy of their published paper. Almost everyone will be happy to send you", "you one. [...] > > > which is a very good answer. However,", "when legal access exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone) Unfortunately, my comment was deleted. It was by no", "is the first option, even when legal access exists.](https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/whos-downloading-pirated-papers-everyone) Unfortunately, my comment was", "> > which is a very good answer. However, as an academic, I", "academic, I wanted to share my experience on when I would use the", "> > I would only write to the authors if Sci-Hub dies. >", "> You can write an e-mail to the authors and ask for a", "to share my experience on when I would use the suggested solution. I" ]
[ "no matter if they are good or bad. So if there are comment", "starting time etc. which would explain this behavior. Again: The given reason for", "answer so far who was negative or where the comments showed strong criticism", "> > Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved", "also a positive answer with +33 which have been moved to chat, but", "if there are comment sections which are comparable in length, I suggest that", "section moved to chat, started with Dec 12th +8 by Nat: Comment section", "are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. >", "12th. Negative answers: +104 by kingledion: Comments section moved to chat, started with", "But if take a closer look, there is something strange. Positive answers: +22", "clearly that the comment section is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons,", "matter if they are good or bad. This is something we could all", "comments. Every (!)* answer so far who was negative or where the comments", "over the diversity engagement had its comment section removed while positive comment sections", "the comment sections has any difference in starting time etc. which would explain", "length, I suggest that we are treating them equally. The presented behavior really", "Dec 12th. Negative answers: +104 by kingledion: Comments section moved to chat, started", "with Dec 12th. Ulizubotb Hannoqg has also a positive answer with +33 which", "etc. which would explain this behavior. Again: The given reason for removing a", "been moved to chat, but she was also criticized in the comments. Every", "criticism over the diversity engagement had its comment section removed while positive comment", "negative answers (\"Leave it blank\"). Now comments sections have been replaced with >", "of the comment sections has any difference in starting time etc. which would", "Again*: The given reason for removing a comment section is that is not", "something strange. Positive answers: +22 accepted by xyz123: 13 comments starting with Dec", "positive (\"Use the opportunity\") as negative answers (\"Leave it blank\"). Now comments sections", "extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. > This indicates clearly", "moved to chat, started with Dec 12th +8 by Nat: Comment section moved", "section is that is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons, no matter", "been replaced with > > Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation", "is something strange. Positive answers: +22 accepted by xyz123: 13 comments starting with", "negative or where the comments showed strong criticism over the diversity engagement had", "comment section is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons, no matter if", "is that is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons, no matter if", "accepted by xyz123: 13 comments starting with Dec 12th. +14 by Ansa FpTC:", "> This indicates clearly that the comment section is not for (extended) discussion", "which would explain this behavior. Again: The given reason for removing a comment", "replaced with > > Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has", "all live with. But if take a closer look, there is something strange.", "irrespective of reasons, no matter if they are good or bad. So if", "have been moved to chat, but she was also criticized in the comments.", "suggest that we are treating them equally. The presented behavior really looks like", "behavior really looks like that a moderator could abuse his power to foster", "or bad. This is something we could all live with. But if take", "+14 by Ansa FpTC: 17 (!) comments starting with Dec 12th. Negative answers:", "by xyz123: 13 comments starting with Dec 12th. +14 by Ansa FpTC: 17", "started with Dec 12th. Ulizubotb Hannoqg has also a positive answer with +33", "reason for removing a comment section is that is not for (extended) discussion", "that a moderator could abuse his power to foster opinions (s)he likes and", "Ansa FpTC: 17 (!) comments starting with Dec 12th. Negative answers: +104 by", "abuse his power to foster opinions (s)he likes and suppress opinions (s)he dislikes", "moderator could abuse his power to foster opinions (s)he likes and suppress opinions", "comment sections has any difference in starting time etc. which would explain this", "12th. Ulizubotb Hannoqg has also a positive answer with +33 which have been", "really looks like that a moderator could abuse his power to foster opinions", "comments starting with Dec 12th. +14 by Ansa FpTC: 17 (!) comments starting", "with Dec 12th +8 by Nat: Comment section moved to chat, started with", "moved to chat. > This indicates clearly that the comment section is not", "by Nat: Comment section moved to chat, started with Dec 12th. Ulizubotb Hannoqg", "Dec 12th. Ulizubotb Hannoqg has also a positive answer with +33 which have", "discussion irrespective of reasons, no matter if they are good or bad. So", "was negative or where the comments showed strong criticism over the diversity engagement", "like that a moderator could abuse his power to foster opinions (s)he likes", "This indicates clearly that the comment section is not for (extended) discussion irrespective", "moved to chat, but she was also criticized in the comments. Every (!)", "with. But if take a closer look, there is something strange. Positive answers:", "while positive comment sections were unscathed. None of the comment sections has any", "by kingledion: Comments section moved to chat, started with Dec 12th +8 by", "about diversity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100314/should-i-answer-this-question-about-diversity) got both positive (\"Use the opportunity\") as negative answers (\"Leave it", "13 comments starting with Dec 12th. +14 by Ansa FpTC: 17 (!) comments", "xyz123: 13 comments starting with Dec 12th. +14 by Ansa FpTC: 17 (!)", "discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. > This indicates clearly that", "with Dec 12th. Negative answers: +104 by kingledion: Comments section moved to chat,", "(!)** answer so far who was negative or where the comments showed strong", "+104 by kingledion: Comments section moved to chat, started with Dec 12th +8", "This is something we could all live with. But if take a closer", "comments starting with Dec 12th. Negative answers: +104 by kingledion: Comments section moved", "have been replaced with > > Comments are not for extended discussion; this", "for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. > This indicates", "that the comment section is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons, no", "had its comment section removed while positive comment sections were unscathed. None of", "time etc. which would explain this behavior. Again: The given reason for removing", "has any difference in starting time etc. which would explain this behavior. Again:", "the comments showed strong criticism over the diversity engagement had its comment section", "answer with +33 which have been moved to chat, but she was also", "any difference in starting time etc. which would explain this behavior. Again: The", "presented behavior really looks like that a moderator could abuse his power to", "something we could all live with. But if take a closer look, there", "the comment section is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons, no matter", "by Ansa FpTC: 17 (!) comments starting with Dec 12th. Negative answers: +104", "sections which are comparable in length, I suggest that we are treating them", "indicates clearly that the comment section is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of", "12th +8 by Nat: Comment section moved to chat, started with Dec 12th.", "answers (\"Leave it blank\"). Now comments sections have been replaced with > >", "conversation has been moved to chat. > This indicates clearly that the comment", "who was negative or where the comments showed strong criticism over the diversity", "comment section removed while positive comment sections were unscathed. None of the comment", "discussion irrespective of reasons, no matter if they are good or bad. This", "for removing a comment section is that is not for (extended) discussion irrespective", "are treating them equally. The presented behavior really looks like that a moderator", "diversity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100314/should-i-answer-this-question-about-diversity) got both positive (\"Use the opportunity\") as negative answers (\"Leave it blank\").", "started with Dec 12th +8 by Nat: Comment section moved to chat, started", "explain this behavior. Again: The given reason for removing a comment section is", "is something we could all live with. But if take a closer look,", "a moderator could abuse his power to foster opinions (s)he likes and suppress", "the opportunity\") as negative answers (\"Leave it blank\"). Now comments sections have been", "chat, started with Dec 12th. Ulizubotb Hannoqg has also a positive answer with", "opportunity\") as negative answers (\"Leave it blank\"). Now comments sections have been replaced", "to chat, started with Dec 12th +8 by Nat: Comment section moved to", "not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. > This", "moved to chat, started with Dec 12th. Ulizubotb Hannoqg has also a positive", "showed strong criticism over the diversity engagement had its comment section removed while", "so far who was negative or where the comments showed strong criticism over", "it blank\"). Now comments sections have been replaced with > > Comments are", "Dec 12th. +14 by Ansa FpTC: 17 (!) comments starting with Dec 12th.", "behavior. Again: The given reason for removing a comment section is that is", "section removed while positive comment sections were unscathed. None of the comment sections", "given reason for removing a comment section is that is not for (extended)", "or where the comments showed strong criticism over the diversity engagement had its", "+33 which have been moved to chat, but she was also criticized in", "This question [Should I answer this question about diversity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100314/should-i-answer-this-question-about-diversity) got both positive (\"Use", "them equally. The presented behavior really looks like that a moderator could abuse", "difference in starting time etc. which would explain this behavior. Again: The given", "reasons, no matter if they are good or bad. This is something we", "criticized in the comments. Every (!)* answer so far who was negative or", "Now comments sections have been replaced with > > Comments are not for", "is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons, no matter if they are", "a comment section is that is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons,", "+8 by Nat: Comment section moved to chat, started with Dec 12th. Ulizubotb", "bad. This is something we could all live with. But if take a", "starting with Dec 12th. Negative answers: +104 by kingledion: Comments section moved to", "Comments section moved to chat, started with Dec 12th +8 by Nat: Comment", "removing a comment section is that is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of", "for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons, no matter if they are good or", "equally. The presented behavior really looks like that a moderator could abuse his", "we could all live with. But if take a closer look, there is", "she was also criticized in the comments. Every (!)* answer so far who", "also criticized in the comments. Every (!) answer so far who was negative", "to foster opinions (s)he likes and suppress opinions (s)he dislikes by treating comment", "chat, but she was also criticized in the comments. Every (!) answer so", "starting with Dec 12th. +14 by Ansa FpTC: 17 (!) comments starting with", "there are comment sections which are comparable in length, I suggest that we", "opinions (s)he likes and suppress opinions (s)he dislikes by treating comment sections differently.", "> Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to", "answers: +22 accepted by xyz123: 13 comments starting with Dec 12th. +14 by", "where the comments showed strong criticism over the diversity engagement had its comment", "in starting time etc. which would explain this behavior. Again: The given reason", "question [Should I answer this question about diversity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100314/should-i-answer-this-question-about-diversity) got both positive (\"Use the", "there is something strange. Positive answers: +22 accepted by xyz123: 13 comments starting", "strong criticism over the diversity engagement had its comment section removed while positive", "+22 accepted by xyz123: 13 comments starting with Dec 12th. +14 by Ansa", "(\"Use the opportunity\") as negative answers (\"Leave it blank\"). Now comments sections have", "could all live with. But if take a closer look, there is something", "sections were unscathed. None of the comment sections has any difference in starting", "matter if they are good or bad. So if there are comment sections", "of reasons, no matter if they are good or bad. This is something", "sections have been replaced with > > Comments are not for extended discussion;", "diversity engagement had its comment section removed while positive comment sections were unscathed.", "Positive answers: +22 accepted by xyz123: 13 comments starting with Dec 12th. +14", "that we are treating them equally. The presented behavior really looks like that", "live with. But if take a closer look, there is something strange. Positive", "comments showed strong criticism over the diversity engagement had its comment section removed", "The given reason for removing a comment section is that is not for", "if they are good or bad. So if there are comment sections which", "but she was also criticized in the comments. Every (!)* answer so far", "reasons, no matter if they are good or bad. So if there are", "with +33 which have been moved to chat, but she was also criticized", "(extended) discussion irrespective of reasons, no matter if they are good or bad.", "Nat: Comment section moved to chat, started with Dec 12th. Ulizubotb Hannoqg has", "been moved to chat. > This indicates clearly that the comment section is", "no matter if they are good or bad. This is something we could", "closer look, there is something strange. Positive answers: +22 accepted by xyz123: 13", "to chat. > This indicates clearly that the comment section is not for", "Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.", "the diversity engagement had its comment section removed while positive comment sections were", "treating them equally. The presented behavior really looks like that a moderator could", "The presented behavior really looks like that a moderator could abuse his power", "section moved to chat, started with Dec 12th. Ulizubotb Hannoqg has also a", "power to foster opinions (s)he likes and suppress opinions (s)he dislikes by treating", "not for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons, no matter if they are good", "are good or bad. So if there are comment sections which are comparable", "this behavior. Again: The given reason for removing a comment section is that", "(!) comments starting with Dec 12th. Negative answers: +104 by kingledion: Comments section", "bad. So if there are comment sections which are comparable in length, I", "I suggest that we are treating them equally. The presented behavior really looks", "answers: +104 by kingledion: Comments section moved to chat, started with Dec 12th", "with > > Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been", "kingledion: Comments section moved to chat, started with Dec 12th +8 by Nat:", "got both positive (\"Use the opportunity\") as negative answers (\"Leave it blank\"). Now", "(\"Leave it blank\"). Now comments sections have been replaced with > > Comments", "strange. Positive answers: +22 accepted by xyz123: 13 comments starting with Dec 12th.", "section is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons, no matter if they", "Every (!) answer so far who was negative or where the comments showed", "would explain this behavior. Again: The given reason for removing a comment section", "as negative answers (\"Leave it blank\"). Now comments sections have been replaced with", "which are comparable in length, I suggest that we are treating them equally.", "the comments. Every (!) answer so far who was negative or where the", "17 (!) comments starting with Dec 12th. Negative answers: +104 by kingledion: Comments", "his power to foster opinions (s)he likes and suppress opinions (s)he dislikes by", "are comment sections which are comparable in length, I suggest that we are", "12th. +14 by Ansa FpTC: 17 (!) comments starting with Dec 12th. Negative", "question about diversity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100314/should-i-answer-this-question-about-diversity) got both positive (\"Use the opportunity\") as negative answers (\"Leave", "answer this question about diversity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100314/should-i-answer-this-question-about-diversity) got both positive (\"Use the opportunity\") as negative", "chat. > This indicates clearly that the comment section is not for (extended)", "that is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons, no matter if they", "Negative answers: +104 by kingledion: Comments section moved to chat, started with Dec", "Ulizubotb Hannoqg has also a positive answer with +33 which have been moved", "its comment section removed while positive comment sections were unscathed. None of the", "of reasons, no matter if they are good or bad. So if there", "a positive answer with +33 which have been moved to chat, but she", "looks like that a moderator could abuse his power to foster opinions (s)he", "irrespective of reasons, no matter if they are good or bad. This is", "could abuse his power to foster opinions (s)he likes and suppress opinions (s)he", "has been moved to chat. > This indicates clearly that the comment section", "were unscathed. None of the comment sections has any difference in starting time", "sections has any difference in starting time etc. which would explain this behavior.", "look, there is something strange. Positive answers: +22 accepted by xyz123: 13 comments", "FpTC: 17 (!) comments starting with Dec 12th. Negative answers: +104 by kingledion:", "None of the comment sections has any difference in starting time etc. which", "far who was negative or where the comments showed strong criticism over the", "was also criticized in the comments. Every (!) answer so far who was", "unscathed. None of the comment sections has any difference in starting time etc.", "comparable in length, I suggest that we are treating them equally. The presented", "Comment section moved to chat, started with Dec 12th. Ulizubotb Hannoqg has also", "engagement had its comment section removed while positive comment sections were unscathed. None", "they are good or bad. So if there are comment sections which are", "good or bad. So if there are comment sections which are comparable in", "positive answer with +33 which have been moved to chat, but she was", "or bad. So if there are comment sections which are comparable in length,", "Hannoqg has also a positive answer with +33 which have been moved to", "both positive (\"Use the opportunity\") as negative answers (\"Leave it blank\"). Now comments", "foster opinions (s)he likes and suppress opinions (s)he dislikes by treating comment sections", "this conversation has been moved to chat. > This indicates clearly that the", "Dec 12th +8 by Nat: Comment section moved to chat, started with Dec", "comment sections which are comparable in length, I suggest that we are treating", "removed while positive comment sections were unscathed. None of the comment sections has", "positive comment sections were unscathed. None of the comment sections has any difference", "if take a closer look, there is something strange. Positive answers: +22 accepted", "in the comments. Every (!)* answer so far who was negative or where", "a closer look, there is something strange. Positive answers: +22 accepted by xyz123:", "are comparable in length, I suggest that we are treating them equally. The", "in length, I suggest that we are treating them equally. The presented behavior", "this question about diversity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100314/should-i-answer-this-question-about-diversity) got both positive (\"Use the opportunity\") as negative answers", "they are good or bad. This is something we could all live with.", "comments sections have been replaced with > > Comments are not for extended", "to chat, but she was also criticized in the comments. Every (!)* answer", "we are treating them equally. The presented behavior really looks like that a", "blank\"). Now comments sections have been replaced with > > Comments are not", "has also a positive answer with +33 which have been moved to chat,", "take a closer look, there is something strange. Positive answers: +22 accepted by", "to chat, started with Dec 12th. Ulizubotb Hannoqg has also a positive answer", "So if there are comment sections which are comparable in length, I suggest", "good or bad. This is something we could all live with. But if", "comment section is that is not for (extended) discussion irrespective of reasons, no", "chat, started with Dec 12th +8 by Nat: Comment section moved to chat,", "with Dec 12th. +14 by Ansa FpTC: 17 (!) comments starting with Dec", "if they are good or bad. This is something we could all live", "comment sections were unscathed. None of the comment sections has any difference in", "I answer this question about diversity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100314/should-i-answer-this-question-about-diversity) got both positive (\"Use the opportunity\") as", "[Should I answer this question about diversity?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100314/should-i-answer-this-question-about-diversity) got both positive (\"Use the opportunity\")", "which have been moved to chat, but she was also criticized in the", "are good or bad. This is something we could all live with. But" ]
[ "if s/he thinks it offends him/her, please explain why? Here is the text", "spam. And if s/he thinks it offends him/her, please explain why? Here is", "to a healthy 57% female majority in 2014, thanks to the affirmative action", "people are more equal than others. Therefore, it is only natural that some", "But this is easily disproven by noting that women can still apply to", "non-gender-specific job postings. > > > to answer your question, such an effective", "why would you want to sue such a moral endeavour. Especially, if you", "that all actions are justified for the greater good. > > > In", "based on sex\" seems quite sexist to me. I advise you to check", "end justifies the means\" Doctrine which clearly states: that all actions are justified", "And if s/he thinks it offends him/her, please explain why? Here is the", "to answer your question, such an effective and moral actions cannot be illegal", "patriarchal motives by the use of the word \"men\". > > > You", "sue such a moral endeavour. Especially, if you see its success in the", "great benefits that \"trying to control demographics in order to level inequalities\" has", "be a bit unethical because it might hurt the transgender and non-binary people.", "you to check your privilege. > > > Although, I might concede that", "> You questioning \"the separation of job postings based on sex\" seems quite", "countries like Germany or Israel. > > > One might perhaps argue that", "means\" Doctrine which clearly states: that all actions are justified for the greater", "undergrad admission.Where the proportion of bachelor's degrees earned has went from an opressive", "quite sexist to me. I advise you to check your privilege. > >", "Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709) A moderator kept deleting my answer under the pretence it's spam/offensive. I", "clearly states: that all actions are justified for the greater good. > >", "such a posting might be a bit unethical because it might hurt the", "Germany or Israel. > > > One might perhaps argue that this is", "see the great benefits that \"trying to control demographics in order to level", "others. Therefore, it is only natural that some actions that are inherently negative", "is \"a form of separate but equal\". But this is easily disproven by", "noting that women can still apply to the other non-gender-specific job postings. >", "In fact, I'm puzzled why would you want to sue such a moral", "sex\" seems quite sexist to me. I advise you to check your privilege.", "greater good. > > > In fact, I'm puzzled why would you want", "why? Here is the text of the answer: > > All people are", "the United states' undergrad admission.Where the proportion of bachelor's degrees earned has went", "the answer: > > All people are equal, but some people are more", "don't believe it's spam. And if s/he thinks it offends him/her, please explain", "that some actions that are inherently negative see themselves become positive. This is", "Position (Tenure Track) for a female Researcher\" illegal in Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709) A moderator kept", "in advanced countries like Germany or Israel. > > > One might perhaps", "people are equal, but some people are more equal than others. Therefore, it", "Stack Exchange post: [Is \"Assistant Professor Position (Tenure Track) for a female Researcher\"", "moral actions cannot be illegal unless you go by the rotten principle that", "a posting might be a bit unethical because it might hurt the transgender", "I advise you to check your privilege. > > > Although, I might", "more, If you see the great benefits that \"trying to control demographics in", "fact, I'm puzzled why would you want to sue such a moral endeavour.", "thinks it offends him/her, please explain why? Here is the text of the", "privilege. > > > Although, I might concede that such a posting might", "is the text of the answer: > > All people are equal, but", "you want to sue such a moral endeavour. Especially, if you see its", "perhaps argue that this is \"a form of separate but equal\". But this", "positive. This is justified by \"the end justifies the means\" Doctrine which clearly", "in 1974 to a healthy 57% female majority in 2014, thanks to the", "justifies the means\" Doctrine which clearly states: that all actions are justified for", "inequalities\" has brought upon humanity as seen in advanced countries like Germany or", "like Germany or Israel. > > > One might perhaps argue that this", "1974 to a healthy 57% female majority in 2014, thanks to the affirmative", "on sex\" seems quite sexist to me. I advise you to check your", "to level inequalities\" has brought upon humanity as seen in advanced countries like", "> All people are equal, but some people are more equal than others.", "that \"all men are equal. full stop\". A heinous saying that does not", "it offends him/her, please explain why? Here is the text of the answer:", "advise you to check your privilege. > > > Although, I might concede", "want to sue such a moral endeavour. Especially, if you see its success", "to check your privilege. > > > Although, I might concede that such", "him/her, please explain why? Here is the text of the answer: > >", "posting might be a bit unethical because it might hurt the transgender and", "\"trying to control demographics in order to level inequalities\" has brought upon humanity", "> > > One might perhaps argue that this is \"a form of", "a female Researcher\" illegal in Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709) A moderator kept deleting my answer under", "it baffles me even more, If you see the great benefits that \"trying", "can still apply to the other non-gender-specific job postings. > > > to", "You questioning \"the separation of job postings based on sex\" seems quite sexist", "more equal than others. Therefore, it is only natural that some actions that", "is easily disproven by noting that women can still apply to the other", "to control demographics in order to level inequalities\" has brought upon humanity as", "in the United states' undergrad admission.Where the proportion of bachelor's degrees earned has", "an opressive 55% male majority in 1974 to a healthy 57% female majority", "of separate but equal\". But this is easily disproven by noting that women", "than others. Therefore, it is only natural that some actions that are inherently", "an effective and moral actions cannot be illegal unless you go by the", "of bachelor's degrees earned has went from an opressive 55% male majority in", "seems quite sexist to me. I advise you to check your privilege. >", "that does not try to hide its patriarchal motives by the use of", "that women can still apply to the other non-gender-specific job postings. > >", "spam/offensive. I don't believe it's spam. And if s/he thinks it offends him/her,", "a moral endeavour. Especially, if you see its success in the United states'", "justified for the greater good. > > > In fact, I'm puzzled why", "the text of the answer: > > All people are equal, but some", "it's spam/offensive. I don't believe it's spam. And if s/he thinks it offends", "but some people are more equal than others. Therefore, it is only natural", "upon humanity as seen in advanced countries like Germany or Israel. > >", "are inherently negative see themselves become positive. This is justified by \"the end", "\"the end justifies the means\" Doctrine which clearly states: that all actions are", "good. > > > In fact, I'm puzzled why would you want to", "it is only natural that some actions that are inherently negative see themselves", "by \"the end justifies the means\" Doctrine which clearly states: that all actions", "but equal\". But this is easily disproven by noting that women can still", "earned has went from an opressive 55% male majority in 1974 to a", "male majority in 1974 to a healthy 57% female majority in 2014, thanks", "saying that does not try to hide its patriarchal motives by the use", "2014, thanks to the affirmative action policy that continues to this day. >", "\"the separation of job postings based on sex\" seems quite sexist to me.", "> > to answer your question, such an effective and moral actions cannot", "might perhaps argue that this is \"a form of separate but equal\". But", "form of separate but equal\". But this is easily disproven by noting that", "or Israel. > > > One might perhaps argue that this is \"a", "the other non-gender-specific job postings. > > > to answer your question, such", "is only natural that some actions that are inherently negative see themselves become", "by noting that women can still apply to the other non-gender-specific job postings.", "is justified by \"the end justifies the means\" Doctrine which clearly states: that", "questioning \"the separation of job postings based on sex\" seems quite sexist to", "word \"men\". > > > You questioning \"the separation of job postings based", "illegal unless you go by the rotten principle that \"all men are equal.", "benefits that \"trying to control demographics in order to level inequalities\" has brought", "answer: > > All people are equal, but some people are more equal", "and it baffles me even more, If you see the great benefits that", "Israel. > > > One might perhaps argue that this is \"a form", "57% female majority in 2014, thanks to the affirmative action policy that continues", "which clearly states: that all actions are justified for the greater good. >", "if you see its success in the United states' undergrad admission.Where the proportion", "me. I advise you to check your privilege. > > > Although, I", "for the greater good. > > > In fact, I'm puzzled why would", "> and it baffles me even more, If you see the great benefits", "might concede that such a posting might be a bit unethical because it", "degrees earned has went from an opressive 55% male majority in 1974 to", "postings. > > > to answer your question, such an effective and moral", "the word \"men\". > > > You questioning \"the separation of job postings", "> > In fact, I'm puzzled why would you want to sue such", "might be a bit unethical because it might hurt the transgender and non-binary", "(Tenure Track) for a female Researcher\" illegal in Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709) A moderator kept deleting", "try to hide its patriarchal motives by the use of the word \"men\".", "this is \"a form of separate but equal\". But this is easily disproven", "level inequalities\" has brought upon humanity as seen in advanced countries like Germany", "its patriarchal motives by the use of the word \"men\". > > >", "this is easily disproven by noting that women can still apply to the", "and moral actions cannot be illegal unless you go by the rotten principle", "> > > In fact, I'm puzzled why would you want to sue", "even more, If you see the great benefits that \"trying to control demographics", "Although, I might concede that such a posting might be a bit unethical", "brought upon humanity as seen in advanced countries like Germany or Israel. >", "about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [Is \"Assistant Professor Position (Tenure Track) for", "use of the word \"men\". > > > You questioning \"the separation of", "advanced countries like Germany or Israel. > > > One might perhaps argue", "a question about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [Is \"Assistant Professor Position (Tenure", "by the use of the word \"men\". > > > You questioning \"the", "some people are more equal than others. Therefore, it is only natural that", "that \"trying to control demographics in order to level inequalities\" has brought upon", "principle that \"all men are equal. full stop\". A heinous saying that does", "actions cannot be illegal unless you go by the rotten principle that \"all", "cannot be illegal unless you go by the rotten principle that \"all men", "not try to hide its patriarchal motives by the use of the word", "see its success in the United states' undergrad admission.Where the proportion of bachelor's", "actions are justified for the greater good. > > > In fact, I'm", "motives by the use of the word \"men\". > > > You questioning", "under the pretence it's spam/offensive. I don't believe it's spam. And if s/he", "go by the rotten principle that \"all men are equal. full stop\". A", "women can still apply to the other non-gender-specific job postings. > > >", "> > Although, I might concede that such a posting might be a", "hide its patriarchal motives by the use of the word \"men\". > >", "Therefore, it is only natural that some actions that are inherently negative see", "my answer under the pretence it's spam/offensive. I don't believe it's spam. And", "the rotten principle that \"all men are equal. full stop\". A heinous saying", "you see its success in the United states' undergrad admission.Where the proportion of", "equal\". But this is easily disproven by noting that women can still apply", "you see the great benefits that \"trying to control demographics in order to", "> > You questioning \"the separation of job postings based on sex\" seems", "> > All people are equal, but some people are more equal than", "equal than others. Therefore, it is only natural that some actions that are", "the great benefits that \"trying to control demographics in order to level inequalities\"", "baffles me even more, If you see the great benefits that \"trying to", "moral endeavour. Especially, if you see its success in the United states' undergrad", "question about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [Is \"Assistant Professor Position (Tenure Track)", "are equal. full stop\". A heinous saying that does not try to hide", "> > and it baffles me even more, If you see the great", "does not try to hide its patriarchal motives by the use of the", "admission.Where the proportion of bachelor's degrees earned has went from an opressive 55%", "the means\" Doctrine which clearly states: that all actions are justified for the", "in 2014, thanks to the affirmative action policy that continues to this day.", "you go by the rotten principle that \"all men are equal. full stop\".", "Professor Position (Tenure Track) for a female Researcher\" illegal in Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709) A moderator", "to hide its patriarchal motives by the use of the word \"men\". >", "s/he thinks it offends him/her, please explain why? Here is the text of", "the pretence it's spam/offensive. I don't believe it's spam. And if s/he thinks", "> to answer your question, such an effective and moral actions cannot be", "concede that such a posting might be a bit unethical because it might", "Researcher\" illegal in Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709) A moderator kept deleting my answer under the pretence", "believe it's spam. And if s/he thinks it offends him/her, please explain why?", "This is justified by \"the end justifies the means\" Doctrine which clearly states:", "unethical because it might hurt the transgender and non-binary people. > > >", "unless you go by the rotten principle that \"all men are equal. full", "\"Assistant Professor Position (Tenure Track) for a female Researcher\" illegal in Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709) A", "illegal in Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709) A moderator kept deleting my answer under the pretence it's", "other non-gender-specific job postings. > > > to answer your question, such an", "Track) for a female Researcher\" illegal in Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709) A moderator kept deleting my", "become positive. This is justified by \"the end justifies the means\" Doctrine which", "its success in the United states' undergrad admission.Where the proportion of bachelor's degrees", "> In fact, I'm puzzled why would you want to sue such a", "Especially, if you see its success in the United states' undergrad admission.Where the", "female majority in 2014, thanks to the affirmative action policy that continues to", "[Is \"Assistant Professor Position (Tenure Track) for a female Researcher\" illegal in Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709)", "separation of job postings based on sex\" seems quite sexist to me. I", "proportion of bachelor's degrees earned has went from an opressive 55% male majority", "equal. full stop\". A heinous saying that does not try to hide its", "job postings based on sex\" seems quite sexist to me. I advise you", "> > > Although, I might concede that such a posting might be", "order to level inequalities\" has brought upon humanity as seen in advanced countries", "thanks to the affirmative action policy that continues to this day. > >", "equal, but some people are more equal than others. Therefore, it is only", "answer under the pretence it's spam/offensive. I don't believe it's spam. And if", "apply to the other non-gender-specific job postings. > > > to answer your", "easily disproven by noting that women can still apply to the other non-gender-specific", "A moderator kept deleting my answer under the pretence it's spam/offensive. I don't", "it's spam. And if s/he thinks it offends him/her, please explain why? Here", "in order to level inequalities\" has brought upon humanity as seen in advanced", "effective and moral actions cannot be illegal unless you go by the rotten", "I have a question about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [Is \"Assistant Professor", "text of the answer: > > All people are equal, but some people", "puzzled why would you want to sue such a moral endeavour. Especially, if", "are equal, but some people are more equal than others. Therefore, it is", "some actions that are inherently negative see themselves become positive. This is justified", "moderator kept deleting my answer under the pretence it's spam/offensive. I don't believe", "of the word \"men\". > > > You questioning \"the separation of job", "all actions are justified for the greater good. > > > In fact,", "to this day. > > > and it baffles me even more, If", "states' undergrad admission.Where the proportion of bachelor's degrees earned has went from an", "be illegal unless you go by the rotten principle that \"all men are", "kept deleting my answer under the pretence it's spam/offensive. I don't believe it's", "disproven by noting that women can still apply to the other non-gender-specific job", "affirmative action policy that continues to this day. > > > and it", "please explain why? Here is the text of the answer: > > All", "separate but equal\". But this is easily disproven by noting that women can", "in Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709) A moderator kept deleting my answer under the pretence it's spam/offensive.", "bit unethical because it might hurt the transgender and non-binary people. > >", "went from an opressive 55% male majority in 1974 to a healthy 57%", "rotten principle that \"all men are equal. full stop\". A heinous saying that", "the affirmative action policy that continues to this day. > > > and", "justified by \"the end justifies the means\" Doctrine which clearly states: that all", "\"a form of separate but equal\". But this is easily disproven by noting", "success in the United states' undergrad admission.Where the proportion of bachelor's degrees earned", "majority in 2014, thanks to the affirmative action policy that continues to this", "inherently negative see themselves become positive. This is justified by \"the end justifies", "check your privilege. > > > Although, I might concede that such a", "majority in 1974 to a healthy 57% female majority in 2014, thanks to", "answer your question, such an effective and moral actions cannot be illegal unless", "postings based on sex\" seems quite sexist to me. I advise you to", "> One might perhaps argue that this is \"a form of separate but", "your question, such an effective and moral actions cannot be illegal unless you", "> > > You questioning \"the separation of job postings based on sex\"", "have a question about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [Is \"Assistant Professor Position", "I'm puzzled why would you want to sue such a moral endeavour. Especially,", "to the other non-gender-specific job postings. > > > to answer your question,", "are justified for the greater good. > > > In fact, I'm puzzled", "> > > and it baffles me even more, If you see the", "as seen in advanced countries like Germany or Israel. > > > One", "still apply to the other non-gender-specific job postings. > > > to answer", "of job postings based on sex\" seems quite sexist to me. I advise", "full stop\". A heinous saying that does not try to hide its patriarchal", "negative see themselves become positive. This is justified by \"the end justifies the", "my Academia Stack Exchange post: [Is \"Assistant Professor Position (Tenure Track) for a", "actions that are inherently negative see themselves become positive. This is justified by", "such a moral endeavour. Especially, if you see its success in the United", "One might perhaps argue that this is \"a form of separate but equal\".", "continues to this day. > > > and it baffles me even more,", "the proportion of bachelor's degrees earned has went from an opressive 55% male", "humanity as seen in advanced countries like Germany or Israel. > > >", "are more equal than others. Therefore, it is only natural that some actions", "natural that some actions that are inherently negative see themselves become positive. This", "that continues to this day. > > > and it baffles me even", "policy that continues to this day. > > > and it baffles me", "healthy 57% female majority in 2014, thanks to the affirmative action policy that", "that such a posting might be a bit unethical because it might hurt", "Exchange post: [Is \"Assistant Professor Position (Tenure Track) for a female Researcher\" illegal", "All people are equal, but some people are more equal than others. Therefore,", "bachelor's degrees earned has went from an opressive 55% male majority in 1974", "only natural that some actions that are inherently negative see themselves become positive.", "the greater good. > > > In fact, I'm puzzled why would you", "action policy that continues to this day. > > > and it baffles", "\"all men are equal. full stop\". A heinous saying that does not try", "by the rotten principle that \"all men are equal. full stop\". A heinous", "I don't believe it's spam. And if s/he thinks it offends him/her, please", "for a female Researcher\" illegal in Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709) A moderator kept deleting my answer", "explain why? Here is the text of the answer: > > All people", "themselves become positive. This is justified by \"the end justifies the means\" Doctrine", "deleting my answer under the pretence it's spam/offensive. I don't believe it's spam.", "me even more, If you see the great benefits that \"trying to control", "> > One might perhaps argue that this is \"a form of separate", "stop\". A heinous saying that does not try to hide its patriarchal motives", "United states' undergrad admission.Where the proportion of bachelor's degrees earned has went from", "has brought upon humanity as seen in advanced countries like Germany or Israel.", "heinous saying that does not try to hide its patriarchal motives by the", "your privilege. > > > Although, I might concede that such a posting", "to the affirmative action policy that continues to this day. > > >", "such an effective and moral actions cannot be illegal unless you go by", "opressive 55% male majority in 1974 to a healthy 57% female majority in", "Doctrine which clearly states: that all actions are justified for the greater good.", "post: [Is \"Assistant Professor Position (Tenure Track) for a female Researcher\" illegal in", "endeavour. Especially, if you see its success in the United states' undergrad admission.Where", "seen in advanced countries like Germany or Israel. > > > One might", "that this is \"a form of separate but equal\". But this is easily", "Academia Stack Exchange post: [Is \"Assistant Professor Position (Tenure Track) for a female", "states: that all actions are justified for the greater good. > > >", "a healthy 57% female majority in 2014, thanks to the affirmative action policy", "> > > to answer your question, such an effective and moral actions", "the use of the word \"men\". > > > You questioning \"the separation", "a bit unethical because it might hurt the transgender and non-binary people. >", "to me. I advise you to check your privilege. > > > Although,", "demographics in order to level inequalities\" has brought upon humanity as seen in", "argue that this is \"a form of separate but equal\". But this is", "men are equal. full stop\". A heinous saying that does not try to", "Here is the text of the answer: > > All people are equal,", "offends him/her, please explain why? Here is the text of the answer: >", "to sue such a moral endeavour. Especially, if you see its success in", "I might concede that such a posting might be a bit unethical because", "pretence it's spam/offensive. I don't believe it's spam. And if s/he thinks it", "55% male majority in 1974 to a healthy 57% female majority in 2014,", "sexist to me. I advise you to check your privilege. > > >", "would you want to sue such a moral endeavour. Especially, if you see", "has went from an opressive 55% male majority in 1974 to a healthy", "question, such an effective and moral actions cannot be illegal unless you go", "that are inherently negative see themselves become positive. This is justified by \"the", "from an opressive 55% male majority in 1974 to a healthy 57% female", "see themselves become positive. This is justified by \"the end justifies the means\"", "this day. > > > and it baffles me even more, If you", "\"men\". > > > You questioning \"the separation of job postings based on", "> Although, I might concede that such a posting might be a bit", "A heinous saying that does not try to hide its patriarchal motives by", "job postings. > > > to answer your question, such an effective and", "female Researcher\" illegal in Austria?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100529/is-assistant-professor-position-tenure-track-for-a-female-researcher-illegal/100709#100709) A moderator kept deleting my answer under the", "If you see the great benefits that \"trying to control demographics in order", "day. > > > and it baffles me even more, If you see", "control demographics in order to level inequalities\" has brought upon humanity as seen", "of the answer: > > All people are equal, but some people are" ]
[ "is not present here at ac.se in sufficient numbers anyway, so the question", "votes. So far, I have not even seen any useful comments to the", "USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track) as too broad. I narrowed it, many times, last time after the", "expertise is not present here at ac.se in sufficient numbers anyway, so the", "really informed folks, but rather mostly junk (=uninformed) answers and junk votes. So", "votes from really informed folks, but rather mostly junk (=uninformed) answers and junk", "mostly junk (=uninformed) answers and junk votes. So far, I have not even", "anyway, so the question was already narrow enough and is now even narrower,", "wondering how often should the narrowing happen. I'm under the impression that the", "on hold. I'm wondering how often should the narrowing happen. I'm under the", "already narrow enough and is now even narrower, potentially not admitting too many", "Some folks considered the prior installments of the question [Worst cover-letter mistakes of", "hold. I'm wondering how often should the narrowing happen. I'm under the impression", "the question has been put on hold. I'm wondering how often should the", "too many answers or votes from really informed folks, but rather mostly junk", "the prior installments of the question [Worst cover-letter mistakes of continental-European applicants for", "sufficient numbers anyway, so the question was already narrow enough and is now", "numbers anyway, so the question was already narrow enough and is now even", "continental-European applicants for tenure-track assistant professorship positions in CS in USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track) as too", "question was already narrow enough and is now even narrower, potentially not admitting", "the narrowing happen. I'm under the impression that the expertise is not present", "mistakes of continental-European applicants for tenure-track assistant professorship positions in CS in USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track)", "the expertise is not present here at ac.se in sufficient numbers anyway, so", "So far, I have not even seen any useful comments to the contents", "so the question was already narrow enough and is now even narrower, potentially", "considered the prior installments of the question [Worst cover-letter mistakes of continental-European applicants", "happen. I'm under the impression that the expertise is not present here at", "in sufficient numbers anyway, so the question was already narrow enough and is", "or votes from really informed folks, but rather mostly junk (=uninformed) answers and", "installments of the question [Worst cover-letter mistakes of continental-European applicants for tenure-track assistant", "broad. I narrowed it, many times, last time after the question has been", "of the question [Worst cover-letter mistakes of continental-European applicants for tenure-track assistant professorship", "assistant professorship positions in CS in USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track) as too broad. I narrowed it,", "put on hold. I'm wondering how often should the narrowing happen. I'm under", "cover-letter mistakes of continental-European applicants for tenure-track assistant professorship positions in CS in", "too broad. I narrowed it, many times, last time after the question has", "and is now even narrower, potentially not admitting too many answers or votes", "narrowed it, many times, last time after the question has been put on", "the question [Worst cover-letter mistakes of continental-European applicants for tenure-track assistant professorship positions", "last time after the question has been put on hold. I'm wondering how", "for tenure-track assistant professorship positions in CS in USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track) as too broad. I", "here at ac.se in sufficient numbers anyway, so the question was already narrow", "I'm under the impression that the expertise is not present here at ac.se", "many answers or votes from really informed folks, but rather mostly junk (=uninformed)", "not present here at ac.se in sufficient numbers anyway, so the question was", "applicants for tenure-track assistant professorship positions in CS in USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track) as too broad.", "at ac.se in sufficient numbers anyway, so the question was already narrow enough", "been put on hold. I'm wondering how often should the narrowing happen. I'm", "informed folks, but rather mostly junk (=uninformed) answers and junk votes. So far,", "from really informed folks, but rather mostly junk (=uninformed) answers and junk votes.", "it, many times, last time after the question has been put on hold.", "the question was already narrow enough and is now even narrower, potentially not", "even narrower, potentially not admitting too many answers or votes from really informed", "answers or votes from really informed folks, but rather mostly junk (=uninformed) answers", "times, last time after the question has been put on hold. I'm wondering", "potentially not admitting too many answers or votes from really informed folks, but", "I'm wondering how often should the narrowing happen. I'm under the impression that", "after the question has been put on hold. I'm wondering how often should", "enough and is now even narrower, potentially not admitting too many answers or", "CS in USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track) as too broad. I narrowed it, many times, last time", "tenure-track assistant professorship positions in CS in USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track) as too broad. I narrowed", "impression that the expertise is not present here at ac.se in sufficient numbers", "time after the question has been put on hold. I'm wondering how often", "question [Worst cover-letter mistakes of continental-European applicants for tenure-track assistant professorship positions in", "often should the narrowing happen. I'm under the impression that the expertise is", "how often should the narrowing happen. I'm under the impression that the expertise", "of continental-European applicants for tenure-track assistant professorship positions in CS in USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track) as", "folks, but rather mostly junk (=uninformed) answers and junk votes. So far, I", "and junk votes. So far, I have not even seen any useful comments", "narrower, potentially not admitting too many answers or votes from really informed folks,", "was already narrow enough and is now even narrower, potentially not admitting too", "narrowing happen. I'm under the impression that the expertise is not present here", "rather mostly junk (=uninformed) answers and junk votes. So far, I have not", "narrow enough and is now even narrower, potentially not admitting too many answers", "[Worst cover-letter mistakes of continental-European applicants for tenure-track assistant professorship positions in CS", "I narrowed it, many times, last time after the question has been put", "now even narrower, potentially not admitting too many answers or votes from really", "should the narrowing happen. I'm under the impression that the expertise is not", "folks considered the prior installments of the question [Worst cover-letter mistakes of continental-European", "the impression that the expertise is not present here at ac.se in sufficient", "junk (=uninformed) answers and junk votes. So far, I have not even seen", "present here at ac.se in sufficient numbers anyway, so the question was already", "that the expertise is not present here at ac.se in sufficient numbers anyway,", "in USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track) as too broad. I narrowed it, many times, last time after", "question has been put on hold. I'm wondering how often should the narrowing", "not admitting too many answers or votes from really informed folks, but rather", "is now even narrower, potentially not admitting too many answers or votes from", "as too broad. I narrowed it, many times, last time after the question", "in CS in USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track) as too broad. I narrowed it, many times, last", "ac.se in sufficient numbers anyway, so the question was already narrow enough and", "admitting too many answers or votes from really informed folks, but rather mostly", "prior installments of the question [Worst cover-letter mistakes of continental-European applicants for tenure-track", "answers and junk votes. So far, I have not even seen any useful", "far, I have not even seen any useful comments to the contents either.", "but rather mostly junk (=uninformed) answers and junk votes. So far, I have", "under the impression that the expertise is not present here at ac.se in", "many times, last time after the question has been put on hold. I'm", "has been put on hold. I'm wondering how often should the narrowing happen.", "junk votes. So far, I have not even seen any useful comments to", "positions in CS in USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track) as too broad. I narrowed it, many times,", "professorship positions in CS in USA](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100907/worst-cover-letter-mistakes-of-continental-european-applicants-for-tenure-track) as too broad. I narrowed it, many", "(=uninformed) answers and junk votes. So far, I have not even seen any" ]
[ "those categories. As I said in the comments of that question to another", "time and effort, and that they would be better off not attempting to", "useful information to the person who asked that question (namely, that attempting to", "seem to be any method of privately messaging them on here that I", "even a partial answer to the actual question My answer fell into none", "is already too small to make a significant difference. > > > It", "might be more economically viable), the number of potential female applicants is already", "make a difference either way; in order to do a post-graduate degree in", "would be better off not attempting to [do thing]). As far as I", "to ask them publicly like this instead. When I click the Help Centre", "to an external site * not even a partial answer to the actual", "comments explaining what problems they had with it; they just unilaterally deleted it", "* not even a partial answer to the actual question My answer fell", "and effort, and that they would be better off not attempting to [do", "this question: [Writing ads to attract female PhD candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/), which boiled down to", "> It got upvoted up to +11 votes, and was then deleted by", "too small to make a significant difference. > > > It got upvoted", "the question or other answers * asking another, different question * “thanks!” or", "doesn't seem to be any method of privately messaging them on here that", "was as follows: > > Don't bother trying. Your ad is unlikely to", "degree in Computer Science. Since men who complete said undergraduate degrees significantly outnumber", "for answers to be deleted: * commentary on the question or other answers", "female applicants is already too small to make a significant difference. > >", "answer to the actual question My answer fell into none of those categories.", "need an undergraduate degree in Computer Science. Since men who complete said undergraduate", "external site * not even a partial answer to the actual question My", "than the jobs that might be more economically viable), the number of potential", "question My answer fell into none of those categories. As I said in", "exact duplicates of other answers * barely more than a link to an", "My answer was as follows: > > Don't bother trying. Your ad is", "write job ads to attract female PhD candidates\". My answer was as follows:", "question: [Writing ads to attract female PhD candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/), which boiled down to \"How", "Don't bother trying. Your ad is unlikely to make a difference either way;", "of other answers * barely more than a link to an external site", "site * not even a partial answer to the actual question My answer", "a waste of time and effort, and that they would be better off", "I posted an answer to this question: [Writing ads to attract female PhD", "thing]). As far as I can see, neither of the moderators who deleted", "and StrongBad. Since there doesn't seem to be any method of privately messaging", "of reasons for answers to be deleted: * commentary on the question or", "degrees significantly outnumber the women who complete said degrees (and the ratio gets", "to be deleted: * commentary on the question or other answers * asking", "then deleted by Wrzlprmft and StrongBad. Since there doesn't seem to be any", "are more free to pick the jobs that interest them, rather than the", "candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/), which boiled down to \"How do I write job ads to attract", "trying.** Your ad is unlikely to make a difference either way; in order", "difference either way; in order to do a post-graduate degree in Computer Science,", "small to make a significant difference. > > > It got upvoted up", "the person who asked that question (namely, that attempting to [do thing] is", "do a post-graduate degree in Computer Science, one would presumably need an undergraduate", "the comments of that question to another user, \"Don't bother trying\" is a", "be deleted: * commentary on the question or other answers * asking another,", "I can see, I have to ask them publicly like this instead. When", "commentary on the question or other answers * asking another, different question ", "them, rather than the jobs that might be more economically viable), the number", "either way; in order to do a post-graduate degree in Computer Science, one", "trying\" is a valid answer to \"How do I [do thing]\"; it conveys", "up to +11 votes, and was then deleted by Wrzlprmft and StrongBad. Since", "another user, \"Don't bother trying\" is a valid answer to \"How do I", "Science, one would presumably need an undergraduate degree in Computer Science. Since men", "degrees (and the ratio gets worse the more developed your nation is, as", "question “thanks!” or “me too!” responses * exact duplicates of other answers", "following list of reasons for answers to be deleted: * commentary on the", "or “me too!” responses * exact duplicates of other answers * barely more", "ad is unlikely to make a difference either way; in order to do", "women are more free to pick the jobs that interest them, rather than", "developed your nation is, as the women are more free to pick the", "reasons for answers to be deleted: * commentary on the question or other", "my answer even made any comments explaining what problems they had with it;", "to the actual question My answer fell into none of those categories. As", "the following list of reasons for answers to be deleted: * commentary on", "I click the Help Centre link, I get the following list of reasons", "already too small to make a significant difference. > > > It got", "[do thing] is a waste of time and effort, and that they would", "as follows: > > Don't bother trying. Your ad is unlikely to make", "attract female PhD candidates\". My answer was as follows: > > *Don't bother", "degree in Computer Science, one would presumably need an undergraduate degree in Computer", "the moderators who deleted my answer even made any comments explaining what problems", "not attempting to [do thing]). As far as I can see, neither of", "the ratio gets worse the more developed your nation is, as the women", "one would presumably need an undergraduate degree in Computer Science. Since men who", "interest them, rather than the jobs that might be more economically viable), the", "ask them publicly like this instead. When I click the Help Centre link,", "upvoted up to +11 votes, and was then deleted by Wrzlprmft and StrongBad.", "than a link to an external site not even a partial answer", "more free to pick the jobs that interest them, rather than the jobs", "* commentary on the question or other answers * asking another, different question", "information to the person who asked that question (namely, that attempting to [do", "women who complete said degrees (and the ratio gets worse the more developed", "thing]\"; it conveys useful information to the person who asked that question (namely,", "to [do thing]). As far as I can see, neither of the moderators", "make a significant difference. > > > It got upvoted up to +11", "ratio gets worse the more developed your nation is, as the women are", "on the question or other answers * asking another, different question * “thanks!”", "link to an external site * not even a partial answer to the", "other answers * barely more than a link to an external site ", "Since men who complete said undergraduate degrees significantly outnumber the women who complete", "neither of the moderators who deleted my answer even made any comments explaining", "follows: > > Don't bother trying.* Your ad is unlikely to make a", "said undergraduate degrees significantly outnumber the women who complete said degrees (and the", "far as I can see, neither of the moderators who deleted my answer", "question or other answers * asking another, different question * “thanks!” or “me", "get the following list of reasons for answers to be deleted: * commentary", "of the moderators who deleted my answer even made any comments explaining what", "a valid answer to \"How do I [do thing]\"; it conveys useful information", "to the person who asked that question (namely, that attempting to [do thing]", "I [do thing]\"; it conveys useful information to the person who asked that", "who deleted my answer even made any comments explaining what problems they had", "> Don't bother trying. Your ad is unlikely to make a difference either", "or other answers * asking another, different question * “thanks!” or “me too!”", "Wrzlprmft and StrongBad. Since there doesn't seem to be any method of privately", "be better off not attempting to [do thing]). As far as I can", "potential female applicants is already too small to make a significant difference. >", "comments of that question to another user, \"Don't bother trying\" is a valid", "in order to do a post-graduate degree in Computer Science, one would presumably", "a difference either way; in order to do a post-graduate degree in Computer", "bother trying\" is a valid answer to \"How do I [do thing]\"; it", "moderators who deleted my answer even made any comments explaining what problems they", "barely more than a link to an external site * not even a", "question (namely, that attempting to [do thing] is a waste of time and", "Science. Since men who complete said undergraduate degrees significantly outnumber the women who", "Centre link, I get the following list of reasons for answers to be", "to \"How do I write job ads to attract female PhD candidates\". My", "to make a difference either way; in order to do a post-graduate degree", "presumably need an undergraduate degree in Computer Science. Since men who complete said", "do I [do thing]\"; it conveys useful information to the person who asked", "> > It got upvoted up to +11 votes, and was then deleted", "[Writing ads to attract female PhD candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/), which boiled down to \"How do", "I get the following list of reasons for answers to be deleted: ", "> > Don't bother trying.* Your ad is unlikely to make a difference", "to be any method of privately messaging them on here that I can", "on here that I can see, I have to ask them publicly like", "is a waste of time and effort, and that they would be better", "link, I get the following list of reasons for answers to be deleted:", "your nation is, as the women are more free to pick the jobs", "Your ad is unlikely to make a difference either way; in order to", "significant difference. > > > It got upvoted up to +11 votes, and", "got upvoted up to +11 votes, and was then deleted by Wrzlprmft and", "they would be better off not attempting to [do thing]). As far as", "method of privately messaging them on here that I can see, I have", "of that question to another user, \"Don't bother trying\" is a valid answer", "deleted: * commentary on the question or other answers * asking another, different", "conveys useful information to the person who asked that question (namely, that attempting", "a post-graduate degree in Computer Science, one would presumably need an undergraduate degree", "[do thing]). As far as I can see, neither of the moderators who", "answers to be deleted: * commentary on the question or other answers ", "\"How do I write job ads to attract female PhD candidates\". My answer", "I have to ask them publicly like this instead. When I click the", "more economically viable), the number of potential female applicants is already too small", "more developed your nation is, as the women are more free to pick", "Computer Science. Since men who complete said undergraduate degrees significantly outnumber the women", "there doesn't seem to be any method of privately messaging them on here", "be any method of privately messaging them on here that I can see,", "effort, and that they would be better off not attempting to [do thing]).", "what problems they had with it; they just unilaterally deleted it without explanation.", "them on here that I can see, I have to ask them publicly", "to make a significant difference. > > > It got upvoted up to", "bother trying.* Your ad is unlikely to make a difference either way; in", "click the Help Centre link, I get the following list of reasons for", "who complete said undergraduate degrees significantly outnumber the women who complete said degrees", "by Wrzlprmft and StrongBad. Since there doesn't seem to be any method of", "to [do thing] is a waste of time and effort, and that they", "who asked that question (namely, that attempting to [do thing] is a waste", "like this instead. When I click the Help Centre link, I get the", "into none of those categories. As I said in the comments of that", "undergraduate degree in Computer Science. Since men who complete said undergraduate degrees significantly", "jobs that interest them, rather than the jobs that might be more economically", "asking another, different question * “thanks!” or “me too!” responses * exact duplicates", "explaining what problems they had with it; they just unilaterally deleted it without", "deleted my answer even made any comments explaining what problems they had with", "to attract female PhD candidates\". My answer was as follows: > > *Don't", "and was then deleted by Wrzlprmft and StrongBad. Since there doesn't seem to", "complete said undergraduate degrees significantly outnumber the women who complete said degrees (and", "(namely, that attempting to [do thing] is a waste of time and effort,", "other answers asking another, different question * “thanks!” or “me too!” responses", "none of those categories. As I said in the comments of that question", "an answer to this question: [Writing ads to attract female PhD candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/), which", "off not attempting to [do thing]). As far as I can see, neither", "do I write job ads to attract female PhD candidates\". My answer was", "answer even made any comments explaining what problems they had with it; they", "who complete said degrees (and the ratio gets worse the more developed your", "I can see, neither of the moderators who deleted my answer even made", "to do a post-graduate degree in Computer Science, one would presumably need an", "as the women are more free to pick the jobs that interest them,", "is a valid answer to \"How do I [do thing]\"; it conveys useful", "answer fell into none of those categories. As I said in the comments", "I write job ads to attract female PhD candidates\". My answer was as", "not even a partial answer to the actual question My answer fell into", "publicly like this instead. When I click the Help Centre link, I get", "unlikely to make a difference either way; in order to do a post-graduate", "that interest them, rather than the jobs that might be more economically viable),", "actual question My answer fell into none of those categories. As I said", "here that I can see, I have to ask them publicly like this", "question to another user, \"Don't bother trying\" is a valid answer to \"How", "a partial answer to the actual question My answer fell into none of", "answer to this question: [Writing ads to attract female PhD candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/), which boiled", "that might be more economically viable), the number of potential female applicants is", "have to ask them publicly like this instead. When I click the Help", "nation is, as the women are more free to pick the jobs that", "significantly outnumber the women who complete said degrees (and the ratio gets worse", "StrongBad. Since there doesn't seem to be any method of privately messaging them", "of those categories. As I said in the comments of that question to", "see, I have to ask them publicly like this instead. When I click", "a significant difference. > > > It got upvoted up to +11 votes,", "of privately messaging them on here that I can see, I have to", "privately messaging them on here that I can see, I have to ask", "an external site * not even a partial answer to the actual question", "made any comments explaining what problems they had with it; they just unilaterally", "PhD candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/), which boiled down to \"How do I write job ads to", "more than a link to an external site * not even a partial", "user, \"Don't bother trying\" is a valid answer to \"How do I [do", "boiled down to \"How do I write job ads to attract female PhD", "attract female PhD candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/), which boiled down to \"How do I write job", "* “thanks!” or “me too!” responses * exact duplicates of other answers ", "and that they would be better off not attempting to [do thing]). As", "them publicly like this instead. When I click the Help Centre link, I", "to pick the jobs that interest them, rather than the jobs that might", "worse the more developed your nation is, as the women are more free", "applicants is already too small to make a significant difference. > > >", "the Help Centre link, I get the following list of reasons for answers", "can see, I have to ask them publicly like this instead. When I", "to \"How do I [do thing]\"; it conveys useful information to the person", "gets worse the more developed your nation is, as the women are more", " barely more than a link to an external site * not even", "votes, and was then deleted by Wrzlprmft and StrongBad. Since there doesn't seem", "is unlikely to make a difference either way; in order to do a", "to this question: [Writing ads to attract female PhD candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/), which boiled down", "female PhD candidates\". My answer was as follows: > > Don't bother trying.", "the jobs that interest them, rather than the jobs that might be more", "the jobs that might be more economically viable), the number of potential female", "My answer fell into none of those categories. As I said in the", "answer to \"How do I [do thing]\"; it conveys useful information to the", "ads to attract female PhD candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/), which boiled down to \"How do I", "that question to another user, \"Don't bother trying\" is a valid answer to", "job ads to attract female PhD candidates\". My answer was as follows: >", "instead. When I click the Help Centre link, I get the following list", "pick the jobs that interest them, rather than the jobs that might be", "this instead. When I click the Help Centre link, I get the following", "to another user, \"Don't bother trying\" is a valid answer to \"How do", "the more developed your nation is, as the women are more free to", "viable), the number of potential female applicants is already too small to make", "economically viable), the number of potential female applicants is already too small to", "free to pick the jobs that interest them, rather than the jobs that", "Help Centre link, I get the following list of reasons for answers to", "better off not attempting to [do thing]). As far as I can see,", "said degrees (and the ratio gets worse the more developed your nation is,", "too!” responses * exact duplicates of other answers * barely more than a", "> > > It got upvoted up to +11 votes, and was then", "post-graduate degree in Computer Science, one would presumably need an undergraduate degree in", "that question (namely, that attempting to [do thing] is a waste of time", "in Computer Science, one would presumably need an undergraduate degree in Computer Science.", "\"How do I [do thing]\"; it conveys useful information to the person who", "another, different question * “thanks!” or “me too!” responses * exact duplicates of", "“me too!” responses * exact duplicates of other answers * barely more than", "responses * exact duplicates of other answers * barely more than a link", "men who complete said undergraduate degrees significantly outnumber the women who complete said", "person who asked that question (namely, that attempting to [do thing] is a", "of potential female applicants is already too small to make a significant difference.", "rather than the jobs that might be more economically viable), the number of", "to +11 votes, and was then deleted by Wrzlprmft and StrongBad. Since there", "is, as the women are more free to pick the jobs that interest", "be more economically viable), the number of potential female applicants is already too", "valid answer to \"How do I [do thing]\"; it conveys useful information to", "the number of potential female applicants is already too small to make a", "I said in the comments of that question to another user, \"Don't bother", "posted an answer to this question: [Writing ads to attract female PhD candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/),", "As I said in the comments of that question to another user, \"Don't", "female PhD candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/), which boiled down to \"How do I write job ads", "an undergraduate degree in Computer Science. Since men who complete said undergraduate degrees", "in the comments of that question to another user, \"Don't bother trying\" is", "deleted by Wrzlprmft and StrongBad. Since there doesn't seem to be any method", "messaging them on here that I can see, I have to ask them", "the women who complete said degrees (and the ratio gets worse the more", "asked that question (namely, that attempting to [do thing] is a waste of", "It got upvoted up to +11 votes, and was then deleted by Wrzlprmft", "number of potential female applicants is already too small to make a significant", "partial answer to the actual question My answer fell into none of those", "duplicates of other answers * barely more than a link to an external", "candidates\". My answer was as follows: > > Don't bother trying. Your ad", "answer was as follows: > > Don't bother trying. Your ad is unlikely", "down to \"How do I write job ads to attract female PhD candidates\".", "ads to attract female PhD candidates\". My answer was as follows: > >", "said in the comments of that question to another user, \"Don't bother trying\"", "list of reasons for answers to be deleted: * commentary on the question", "in Computer Science. Since men who complete said undergraduate degrees significantly outnumber the", "that I can see, I have to ask them publicly like this instead.", "[do thing]\"; it conveys useful information to the person who asked that question", "which boiled down to \"How do I write job ads to attract female", "to attract female PhD candidates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100884/writing-ads-to-attract-female-phd-candidates/), which boiled down to \"How do I write", "attempting to [do thing] is a waste of time and effort, and that", "waste of time and effort, and that they would be better off not", "it conveys useful information to the person who asked that question (namely, that", "would presumably need an undergraduate degree in Computer Science. Since men who complete", "“thanks!” or “me too!” responses * exact duplicates of other answers * barely", "a link to an external site * not even a partial answer to", "way; in order to do a post-graduate degree in Computer Science, one would", "difference. > > > It got upvoted up to +11 votes, and was", "answers * barely more than a link to an external site * not", "of time and effort, and that they would be better off not attempting", "outnumber the women who complete said degrees (and the ratio gets worse the", "When I click the Help Centre link, I get the following list of", "PhD candidates\". My answer was as follows: > > Don't bother trying. Your", "complete said degrees (and the ratio gets worse the more developed your nation", "order to do a post-graduate degree in Computer Science, one would presumably need", "jobs that might be more economically viable), the number of potential female applicants", "As far as I can see, neither of the moderators who deleted my", "categories. As I said in the comments of that question to another user,", "as I can see, neither of the moderators who deleted my answer even", "undergraduate degrees significantly outnumber the women who complete said degrees (and the ratio", "that they would be better off not attempting to [do thing]). As far", "any comments explaining what problems they had with it; they just unilaterally deleted", "the actual question My answer fell into none of those categories. As I", "thing] is a waste of time and effort, and that they would be", "different question * “thanks!” or “me too!” responses * exact duplicates of other", "can see, neither of the moderators who deleted my answer even made any", "fell into none of those categories. As I said in the comments of", "attempting to [do thing]). As far as I can see, neither of the", "Computer Science, one would presumably need an undergraduate degree in Computer Science. Since", "the women are more free to pick the jobs that interest them, rather", "\"Don't bother trying\" is a valid answer to \"How do I [do thing]\";", "+11 votes, and was then deleted by Wrzlprmft and StrongBad. Since there doesn't", "answers * asking another, different question * “thanks!” or “me too!” responses ", " asking another, different question * “thanks!” or “me too!” responses * exact", "any method of privately messaging them on here that I can see, I", "see, neither of the moderators who deleted my answer even made any comments", "(and the ratio gets worse the more developed your nation is, as the", "* exact duplicates of other answers * barely more than a link to", "even made any comments explaining what problems they had with it; they just", "that attempting to [do thing] is a waste of time and effort, and", "was then deleted by Wrzlprmft and StrongBad. Since there doesn't seem to be", "Since there doesn't seem to be any method of privately messaging them on" ]
[ "familiar with the privilege.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/protect-questions) But for users without the rep, is the 'flag'", "protected, or is this not the right method? [What do I do if", "But for users without the rep, is the 'flag' function a viable means", "right method? [What do I do if a teacher fails me after they", "'flag' function a viable means to recommend to a Moderator that a question", "a question should be protected, or is this not the right method? [What", "[What do I do if a teacher fails me after they said I'd", "privilege.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/protect-questions) But for users without the rep, is the 'flag' function a viable", "method? [What do I do if a teacher fails me after they said", "the rep, is the 'flag' function a viable means to recommend to a", "question should be protected, or is this not the right method? [What do", "function a viable means to recommend to a Moderator that a question should", "[I am familiar with the privilege.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/protect-questions) But for users without the rep, is", "the privilege.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/protect-questions) But for users without the rep, is the 'flag' function a", "this not the right method? [What do I do if a teacher fails", "that a question should be protected, or is this not the right method?", "with the privilege.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/protect-questions) But for users without the rep, is the 'flag' function", "users without the rep, is the 'flag' function a viable means to recommend", "is this not the right method? [What do I do if a teacher", "or is this not the right method? [What do I do if a", "the 'flag' function a viable means to recommend to a Moderator that a", "recommend to a Moderator that a question should be protected, or is this", "be protected, or is this not the right method? [What do I do", "Moderator that a question should be protected, or is this not the right", "rep, is the 'flag' function a viable means to recommend to a Moderator", "to a Moderator that a question should be protected, or is this not", "without the rep, is the 'flag' function a viable means to recommend to", "is the 'flag' function a viable means to recommend to a Moderator that", "not the right method? [What do I do if a teacher fails me", "do I do if a teacher fails me after they said I'd pass?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100930/what-do-i-do-if-a-teacher-fails-me-after-they-said-id-pass/100935#100935)", "means to recommend to a Moderator that a question should be protected, or", "for users without the rep, is the 'flag' function a viable means to", "viable means to recommend to a Moderator that a question should be protected,", "should be protected, or is this not the right method? [What do I", "the right method? [What do I do if a teacher fails me after", "a Moderator that a question should be protected, or is this not the", "am familiar with the privilege.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/protect-questions) But for users without the rep, is the", "a viable means to recommend to a Moderator that a question should be", "to recommend to a Moderator that a question should be protected, or is" ]
[ "books, scientific articles and so on? For example, if I want resourses on", "ask to help me to look for resourses like books, scientific articles and", "topic (Does oxygen induce coagulation?), what tag I have to use? Maybe literature-search", "tag I have to use? Maybe literature-search and literatue? Thank you so much", "scientific articles and so on? For example, if I want resourses on a", "want resourses on a specific topic (Does oxygen induce coagulation?), what tag I", "(Does oxygen induce coagulation?), what tag I have to use? Maybe literature-search and", "if I want resourses on a specific topic (Does oxygen induce coagulation?), what", "coagulation?), what tag I have to use? Maybe literature-search and literatue? Thank you", "have to use? Maybe literature-search and literatue? Thank you so much for your", "to use? Maybe literature-search and literatue? Thank you so much for your time.", "to help me to look for resourses like books, scientific articles and so", "so on? For example, if I want resourses on a specific topic (Does", "for resourses like books, scientific articles and so on? For example, if I", "look for resourses like books, scientific articles and so on? For example, if", "like books, scientific articles and so on? For example, if I want resourses", "on? For example, if I want resourses on a specific topic (Does oxygen", "Where can I ask to help me to look for resourses like books,", "resourses on a specific topic (Does oxygen induce coagulation?), what tag I have", "oxygen induce coagulation?), what tag I have to use? Maybe literature-search and literatue?", "induce coagulation?), what tag I have to use? Maybe literature-search and literatue? Thank", "example, if I want resourses on a specific topic (Does oxygen induce coagulation?),", "resourses like books, scientific articles and so on? For example, if I want", "articles and so on? For example, if I want resourses on a specific", "and so on? For example, if I want resourses on a specific topic", "For example, if I want resourses on a specific topic (Does oxygen induce", "I ask to help me to look for resourses like books, scientific articles", "me to look for resourses like books, scientific articles and so on? For", "I have to use? Maybe literature-search and literatue? Thank you so much for", "specific topic (Does oxygen induce coagulation?), what tag I have to use? Maybe", "what tag I have to use? Maybe literature-search and literatue? Thank you so", "help me to look for resourses like books, scientific articles and so on?", "a specific topic (Does oxygen induce coagulation?), what tag I have to use?", "to look for resourses like books, scientific articles and so on? For example,", "I want resourses on a specific topic (Does oxygen induce coagulation?), what tag", "on a specific topic (Does oxygen induce coagulation?), what tag I have to", "can I ask to help me to look for resourses like books, scientific" ]
[ "for \"voting irregularities\". What does that mean? Does that mean he created sock", "know [this user](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/56935/leon-meier) was argumentative and seemed to be not-so-subtly trolling the site", "says he was suspended for \"voting irregularities\". What does that mean? Does that", "serially downvoted particularly uses. Or both? Kind of curious what's going on here", "that mean? Does that mean he created sock puppet accounts and upvoted himself?", "argumentative and seemed to be not-so-subtly trolling the site in many ways but", "he serially downvoted particularly uses. Or both? Kind of curious what's going on", "many ways but his profile says he was suspended for \"voting irregularities\". What", "uses. Or both? Kind of curious what's going on here and how one", "accounts and upvoted himself? Or perhaps it means that he serially downvoted particularly", "suspended for \"voting irregularities\". What does that mean? Does that mean he created", "to be not-so-subtly trolling the site in many ways but his profile says", "he created sock puppet accounts and upvoted himself? Or perhaps it means that", "and seemed to be not-so-subtly trolling the site in many ways but his", "particularly uses. Or both? Kind of curious what's going on here and how", "Does that mean he created sock puppet accounts and upvoted himself? Or perhaps", "was argumentative and seemed to be not-so-subtly trolling the site in many ways", "site in many ways but his profile says he was suspended for \"voting", "\"voting irregularities\". What does that mean? Does that mean he created sock puppet", "trolling the site in many ways but his profile says he was suspended", "he was suspended for \"voting irregularities\". What does that mean? Does that mean", "mean? Does that mean he created sock puppet accounts and upvoted himself? Or", "sock puppet accounts and upvoted himself? Or perhaps it means that he serially", "puppet accounts and upvoted himself? Or perhaps it means that he serially downvoted", "the site in many ways but his profile says he was suspended for", "seemed to be not-so-subtly trolling the site in many ways but his profile", "does that mean? Does that mean he created sock puppet accounts and upvoted", "that he serially downvoted particularly uses. Or both? Kind of curious what's going", "was suspended for \"voting irregularities\". What does that mean? Does that mean he", "be not-so-subtly trolling the site in many ways but his profile says he", "in many ways but his profile says he was suspended for \"voting irregularities\".", "downvoted particularly uses. Or both? Kind of curious what's going on here and", "perhaps it means that he serially downvoted particularly uses. Or both? Kind of", "Kind of curious what's going on here and how one can avoid a", "created sock puppet accounts and upvoted himself? Or perhaps it means that he", "[this user](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/56935/leon-meier) was argumentative and seemed to be not-so-subtly trolling the site in", "himself? Or perhaps it means that he serially downvoted particularly uses. Or both?", "both? Kind of curious what's going on here and how one can avoid", "but his profile says he was suspended for \"voting irregularities\". What does that", "means that he serially downvoted particularly uses. Or both? Kind of curious what's", "of curious what's going on here and how one can avoid a similar", "What does that mean? Does that mean he created sock puppet accounts and", "Or both? Kind of curious what's going on here and how one can", "what's going on here and how one can avoid a similar fate. Thanks!", "mean he created sock puppet accounts and upvoted himself? Or perhaps it means", "his profile says he was suspended for \"voting irregularities\". What does that mean?", "that mean he created sock puppet accounts and upvoted himself? Or perhaps it", "and upvoted himself? Or perhaps it means that he serially downvoted particularly uses.", "irregularities\". What does that mean? Does that mean he created sock puppet accounts", "user](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/56935/leon-meier) was argumentative and seemed to be not-so-subtly trolling the site in many", "not-so-subtly trolling the site in many ways but his profile says he was", "ways but his profile says he was suspended for \"voting irregularities\". What does", "curious what's going on here and how one can avoid a similar fate.", "upvoted himself? Or perhaps it means that he serially downvoted particularly uses. Or", "profile says he was suspended for \"voting irregularities\". What does that mean? Does", "it means that he serially downvoted particularly uses. Or both? Kind of curious", "Or perhaps it means that he serially downvoted particularly uses. Or both? Kind", "I know [this user](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/56935/leon-meier) was argumentative and seemed to be not-so-subtly trolling the" ]
[ "discussed in length by the defendant, site moderators, and SE team admins. With", "In most cases the reason has been discussed in length by the defendant,", "rare, account suspensions can happen to users on SE sites. In most cases", "to users on SE sites. In most cases the reason has been discussed", "are interested in how the appeal process works, I wanted to ask, just", "the parties involved. However for those who are interested in how the appeal", "for those who are interested in how the appeal process works, I wanted", "on SE sites. In most cases the reason has been discussed in length", "privy to the parties involved. However for those who are interested in how", "account suspensions can happen to users on SE sites. In most cases the", "involved. However for those who are interested in how the appeal process works,", "team admins. With details privy to the parties involved. However for those who", "those who are interested in how the appeal process works, I wanted to", "appeal process works, I wanted to ask, just how does one appeal an", "in length by the defendant, site moderators, and SE team admins. With details", "works, I wanted to ask, just how does one appeal an account suspension?", "admins. With details privy to the parties involved. However for those who are", "sites. In most cases the reason has been discussed in length by the", "site moderators, and SE team admins. With details privy to the parties involved.", "details privy to the parties involved. However for those who are interested in", "suspensions can happen to users on SE sites. In most cases the reason", "who are interested in how the appeal process works, I wanted to ask,", "happen to users on SE sites. In most cases the reason has been", "been discussed in length by the defendant, site moderators, and SE team admins.", "most cases the reason has been discussed in length by the defendant, site", "the reason has been discussed in length by the defendant, site moderators, and", "SE sites. In most cases the reason has been discussed in length by", "the appeal process works, I wanted to ask, just how does one appeal", "parties involved. However for those who are interested in how the appeal process", "SE team admins. With details privy to the parties involved. However for those", "cases the reason has been discussed in length by the defendant, site moderators,", "users on SE sites. In most cases the reason has been discussed in", "can happen to users on SE sites. In most cases the reason has", "has been discussed in length by the defendant, site moderators, and SE team", "by the defendant, site moderators, and SE team admins. With details privy to", "interested in how the appeal process works, I wanted to ask, just how", "how the appeal process works, I wanted to ask, just how does one", "to the parties involved. However for those who are interested in how the", "moderators, and SE team admins. With details privy to the parties involved. However", "defendant, site moderators, and SE team admins. With details privy to the parties", "in how the appeal process works, I wanted to ask, just how does", "reason has been discussed in length by the defendant, site moderators, and SE", "process works, I wanted to ask, just how does one appeal an account", "Although rare, account suspensions can happen to users on SE sites. In most", "length by the defendant, site moderators, and SE team admins. With details privy", "However for those who are interested in how the appeal process works, I", "With details privy to the parties involved. However for those who are interested", "the defendant, site moderators, and SE team admins. With details privy to the", "and SE team admins. With details privy to the parties involved. However for" ]
[ "do not fall clearly into the help center description of why some answers", "moderator needs to decide if the answer should be deleted. There have been", "users flagging low quality answers, but often these flags are cast on answers", "to an external site > not even a partial answer to the", "an external site > * not even a partial answer to the actual", "> * barely more than a link to an external site > ", "'deleting'\")). The only discussion I can find on deleting answers in general is", "through a community review process. Every once in a while the review process", "fall clearly into the help center description of why some answers are deleted.", "[guidance about deleting answers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/deleted-answers) > > Answers that do not fundamentally answer the", "process. Every once in a while the review process is inconclusive leading to", "true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is) of questions that make the Hot Network Question (HNQ) list. This results", "deleting answers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/deleted-answers) > > Answers that do not fundamentally answer the question may", "exact duplicates of other answers > barely more than a link to", "Hot Network Question (HNQ) list. This results in users flagging low quality answers,", "* barely more than a link to an external site > * not", "question may be removed. This includes answers that are: > > > ", "answers > asking another, different question > * “thanks!” or “me too!”", "scores preventing high-rep users from casting delete vote. This is [particularly true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is) of", "short answer and not a lot of visibility. How do we want moderators", "on the question or other answers > * asking another, different question >", "are cast on answers that do not fall clearly into the help center", "casting delete vote. This is [particularly true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is) of questions that make the Hot", "may be removed. This includes answers that are: > > > * commentary", "by deleting the answer (e.g., [deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting \"show questions tagged 'deleting'\")). The only discussion", "partial answer to the actual question that have resulted in an inconclusive review?", "in users flagging low quality answers, but often these flags are cast on", "have net positive scores that seem to be poorly researched (i.e., worthy of", "or “me too!” responses > * exact duplicates of other answers > ", "flags are cast on answers that do not fall clearly into the help", "removed. This includes answers that are: > > > commentary on the", "auto generated flag for moderator attention where a moderator needs to decide if", "of down votes) and not obviously more than a partial answer to the", "commentary on the question or other answers > asking another, different question", "do not fundamentally answer the question may be removed. This includes answers that", "question > > > One issue is that many low quality answers still", "> > Answers that do not fundamentally answer the question may be removed.", "flagging low quality answers, but often these flags are cast on answers that", "answer to the actual question > > > One issue is that many", "attention where a moderator needs to decide if the answer should be deleted.", "complaints in the past about moderators reacting to these flags by deleting the", "some [guidance about deleting answers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/deleted-answers) > > Answers that do not fundamentally answer", "than a link to an external site > * not even a partial", "decide if the answer should be deleted. There have been complaints in the", "are deleted. Once the answer is flagged, it goes through a community review", "issue is that many low quality answers still have net positive scores preventing", "responses > exact duplicates of other answers > * barely more than", "low quality answers still have net positive scores preventing high-rep users from casting", "in a while the review process is inconclusive leading to an auto generated", "or other answers > * asking another, different question > * “thanks!” or", "moderators reacting to these flags by deleting the answer (e.g., [deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting \"show questions", "> > > One issue is that many low quality answers still have", "(e.g., [deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting \"show questions tagged 'deleting'\")). The only discussion I can find on", "the question or other answers > * asking another, different question > ", "This includes answers that are: > > > commentary on the question", "that are: > > > * commentary on the question or other answers", "cast on answers that do not fall clearly into the help center description", "duplicates of other answers > * barely more than a link to an", "even a partial answer to the actual question > > > One issue", "question or other answers > * asking another, different question > * “thanks!”", "obviously more than a partial answer to the actual question that have resulted", "> > * commentary on the question or other answers > * asking", "leading to an auto generated flag for moderator attention where a moderator needs", "Network Question (HNQ) list. This results in users flagging low quality answers, but", "answers are deleted. Once the answer is flagged, it goes through a community", "been complaints in the past about moderators reacting to these flags by deleting", "quality answers, but often these flags are cast on answers that do not", "and not obviously more than a partial answer to the actual question* that", "is this [old question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted) with a short answer and not a lot of", "we want moderators to handle flags on answers that have net positive scores", "\"show questions tagged 'deleting'\")). The only discussion I can find on deleting answers", "questions that make the Hot Network Question (HNQ) list. This results in users", "while the review process is inconclusive leading to an auto generated flag for", "review process is inconclusive leading to an auto generated flag for moderator attention", "> * commentary on the question or other answers > * asking another,", "down votes) and not obviously more than a partial answer to the actual", "that do not fundamentally answer the question may be removed. This includes answers", "flags on answers that have net positive scores that seem to be poorly", "other answers > barely more than a link to an external site", "This is [particularly true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is) of questions that make the Hot Network Question (HNQ)", "should be deleted. There have been complaints in the past about moderators reacting", "not obviously more than a partial answer to the actual question that have", "list. This results in users flagging low quality answers, but often these flags", "a short answer and not a lot of visibility. How do we want", "description of why some answers are deleted. Once the answer is flagged, it", "> * not even a partial answer to the actual question > >", "answer the question may be removed. This includes answers that are: > >", "lot of visibility. How do we want moderators to handle flags on answers", "“thanks!” or “me too!” responses > * exact duplicates of other answers >", "answers > * barely more than a link to an external site >", "is that many low quality answers still have net positive scores preventing high-rep", "with a short answer and not a lot of visibility. How do we", "the answer should be deleted. There have been complaints in the past about", "to these flags by deleting the answer (e.g., [deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting \"show questions tagged 'deleting'\")).", "a partial answer to the actual question > > > One issue is", "answer (e.g., [deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting \"show questions tagged 'deleting'\")). The only discussion I can find", "tagged 'deleting'\")). The only discussion I can find on deleting answers in general", "asking another, different question > * “thanks!” or “me too!” responses > ", "other answers > asking another, different question > * “thanks!” or “me", "(i.e., worthy of down votes) and not obviously more than a partial answer", "needs to decide if the answer should be deleted. There have been complaints", "not even a partial answer to the actual question > > > One", "site > not even a partial answer to the actual question >", "preventing high-rep users from casting delete vote. This is [particularly true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is) of questions", "includes answers that are: > > > * commentary on the question or", "in general is this [old question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted) with a short answer and not a", "moderators to handle flags on answers that have net positive scores that seem", "help center description of why some answers are deleted. Once the answer is", "that seem to be poorly researched (i.e., worthy of down votes) and not", "answers in general is this [old question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted) with a short answer and not", "often these flags are cast on answers that do not fall clearly into", "center description of why some answers are deleted. Once the answer is flagged,", "Every once in a while the review process is inconclusive leading to an", "not a lot of visibility. How do we want moderators to handle flags", "researched (i.e., worthy of down votes) and not obviously more than a partial", "more than a link to an external site > not even a", "> * “thanks!” or “me too!” responses > * exact duplicates of other", "link to an external site > * not even a partial answer to", "delete vote. This is [particularly true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is) of questions that make the Hot Network", "in the past about moderators reacting to these flags by deleting the answer", "only discussion I can find on deleting answers in general is this [old", "> One issue is that many low quality answers still have net positive", "* “thanks!” or “me too!” responses > * exact duplicates of other answers", "“me too!” responses > * exact duplicates of other answers > * barely", "Question (HNQ) list. This results in users flagging low quality answers, but often", "for moderator attention where a moderator needs to decide if the answer should", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted) with a short answer and not a lot of visibility. How do", "net positive scores that seem to be poorly researched (i.e., worthy of down", "can find on deleting answers in general is this [old question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted) with a", "questions tagged 'deleting'\")). The only discussion I can find on deleting answers in", "> * exact duplicates of other answers > * barely more than a", "is [particularly true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is) of questions that make the Hot Network Question (HNQ) list.", "make the Hot Network Question (HNQ) list. This results in users flagging low", "the answer is flagged, it goes through a community review process. Every once", "but often these flags are cast on answers that do not fall clearly", "external site > * not even a partial answer to the actual question", "deleted. There have been complaints in the past about moderators reacting to these", "some answers are deleted. Once the answer is flagged, it goes through a", "low quality answers, but often these flags are cast on answers that do", "Once the answer is flagged, it goes through a community review process. Every", "on deleting answers in general is this [old question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted) with a short answer", "about deleting answers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/deleted-answers) > > Answers that do not fundamentally answer the question", "that make the Hot Network Question (HNQ) list. This results in users flagging", "question > “thanks!” or “me too!” responses > * exact duplicates of", "high-rep users from casting delete vote. This is [particularly true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is) of questions that", "if the answer should be deleted. There have been complaints in the past", "be removed. This includes answers that are: > > > * commentary on", "are: > > > * commentary on the question or other answers >", "that many low quality answers still have net positive scores preventing high-rep users", "be deleted. There have been complaints in the past about moderators reacting to", "still have net positive scores preventing high-rep users from casting delete vote. This", "to handle flags on answers that have net positive scores that seem to", "discussion I can find on deleting answers in general is this [old question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted)", "general is this [old question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted) with a short answer and not a lot", "a moderator needs to decide if the answer should be deleted. There have", "answers that are: > > > * commentary on the question or other", "provides some [guidance about deleting answers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/deleted-answers) > > Answers that do not fundamentally", "about moderators reacting to these flags by deleting the answer (e.g., [deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting \"show", "positive scores preventing high-rep users from casting delete vote. This is [particularly true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is)", "into the help center description of why some answers are deleted. Once the", "net positive scores preventing high-rep users from casting delete vote. This is [particularly", "deleted. Once the answer is flagged, it goes through a community review process.", "the review process is inconclusive leading to an auto generated flag for moderator", "this [old question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted) with a short answer and not a lot of visibility.", " exact duplicates of other answers > * barely more than a link", "many low quality answers still have net positive scores preventing high-rep users from", "* asking another, different question > * “thanks!” or “me too!” responses >", "it goes through a community review process. Every once in a while the", "past about moderators reacting to these flags by deleting the answer (e.g., [deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting", "users from casting delete vote. This is [particularly true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is) of questions that make", "flagged, it goes through a community review process. Every once in a while", "flags by deleting the answer (e.g., [deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting \"show questions tagged 'deleting'\")). The only", "The only discussion I can find on deleting answers in general is this", "clearly into the help center description of why some answers are deleted. Once", "of visibility. How do we want moderators to handle flags on answers that", "poorly researched (i.e., worthy of down votes) and not obviously more than a", "help center provides some [guidance about deleting answers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/deleted-answers) > > Answers that do", "is flagged, it goes through a community review process. Every once in a", "I can find on deleting answers in general is this [old question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted) with", "fundamentally answer the question may be removed. This includes answers that are: >", "center provides some [guidance about deleting answers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/deleted-answers) > > Answers that do not", "> * asking another, different question > * “thanks!” or “me too!” responses", "on answers that do not fall clearly into the help center description of", "a link to an external site > * not even a partial answer", "and not a lot of visibility. How do we want moderators to handle", "results in users flagging low quality answers, but often these flags are cast", "why some answers are deleted. Once the answer is flagged, it goes through", "have been complaints in the past about moderators reacting to these flags by", "these flags by deleting the answer (e.g., [deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting \"show questions tagged 'deleting'\")). The", "not fundamentally answer the question may be removed. This includes answers that are:", "do we want moderators to handle flags on answers that have net positive", "a while the review process is inconclusive leading to an auto generated flag", "generated flag for moderator attention where a moderator needs to decide if the", "of why some answers are deleted. Once the answer is flagged, it goes", "flag for moderator attention where a moderator needs to decide if the answer", "positive scores that seem to be poorly researched (i.e., worthy of down votes)", "One issue is that many low quality answers still have net positive scores", "> > > * commentary on the question or other answers > ", "an auto generated flag for moderator attention where a moderator needs to decide", "deleting answers in general is this [old question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted) with a short answer and", "that have net positive scores that seem to be poorly researched (i.e., worthy", "be poorly researched (i.e., worthy of down votes) and not obviously more than", "not fall clearly into the help center description of why some answers are", "reacting to these flags by deleting the answer (e.g., [deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting \"show questions tagged", "of questions that make the Hot Network Question (HNQ) list. This results in", "This results in users flagging low quality answers, but often these flags are", "answers that have net positive scores that seem to be poorly researched (i.e.,", "How do we want moderators to handle flags on answers that have net", "> > One issue is that many low quality answers still have net", "a partial answer to the actual question that have resulted in an inconclusive", "community review process. Every once in a while the review process is inconclusive", "process is inconclusive leading to an auto generated flag for moderator attention where", "answer is flagged, it goes through a community review process. Every once in", "votes) and not obviously more than a partial answer to the actual question", "* commentary on the question or other answers > * asking another, different", "review process. Every once in a while the review process is inconclusive leading", "partial answer to the actual question > > > One issue is that", "the Hot Network Question (HNQ) list. This results in users flagging low quality", "worthy of down votes) and not obviously more than a partial answer to", "these flags are cast on answers that do not fall clearly into the", "on answers that have net positive scores that seem to be poorly researched", "to the actual question > > > One issue is that many low", "the question may be removed. This includes answers that are: > > >", "than a partial answer to the actual question* that have resulted in an", "vote. This is [particularly true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is) of questions that make the Hot Network Question", "scores that seem to be poorly researched (i.e., worthy of down votes) and", "inconclusive leading to an auto generated flag for moderator attention where a moderator", "answer and not a lot of visibility. How do we want moderators to", "that do not fall clearly into the help center description of why some", "[particularly true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is) of questions that make the Hot Network Question (HNQ) list. This", "(HNQ) list. This results in users flagging low quality answers, but often these", "handle flags on answers that have net positive scores that seem to be", "of other answers > barely more than a link to an external", "quality answers still have net positive scores preventing high-rep users from casting delete", "is inconclusive leading to an auto generated flag for moderator attention where a", "the answer (e.g., [deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting \"show questions tagged 'deleting'\")). The only discussion I can", "from casting delete vote. This is [particularly true](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/238420/prevent-questions-on-hot-list-from-being-upvoted-by-casual-visitors-only-rep-is) of questions that make the", "answers, but often these flags are cast on answers that do not fall", "answers still have net positive scores preventing high-rep users from casting delete vote.", "answer should be deleted. There have been complaints in the past about moderators", "a lot of visibility. How do we want moderators to handle flags on", "seem to be poorly researched (i.e., worthy of down votes) and not obviously", "to an auto generated flag for moderator attention where a moderator needs to", "once in a while the review process is inconclusive leading to an auto", "to be poorly researched (i.e., worthy of down votes) and not obviously more", "[old question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted) with a short answer and not a lot of visibility. How", "> Answers that do not fundamentally answer the question may be removed. This", "different question > * “thanks!” or “me too!” responses > * exact duplicates", "the actual question > > > One issue is that many low quality", "find on deleting answers in general is this [old question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/86/when-should-an-answer-be-deleted) with a short", "want moderators to handle flags on answers that have net positive scores that", "barely more than a link to an external site > * not even", "visibility. How do we want moderators to handle flags on answers that have", "* not even a partial answer to the actual question > > >", "have net positive scores preventing high-rep users from casting delete vote. This is", "to decide if the answer should be deleted. There have been complaints in", "actual question > > > One issue is that many low quality answers", "deleting the answer (e.g., [deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting \"show questions tagged 'deleting'\")). The only discussion I", "[deleting](/questions/tagged/deleting \"show questions tagged 'deleting'\")). The only discussion I can find on deleting", "too!” responses > * exact duplicates of other answers > * barely more", "answers that do not fall clearly into the help center description of why", "answers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/deleted-answers) > > Answers that do not fundamentally answer the question may be", "the help center description of why some answers are deleted. Once the answer", "a community review process. Every once in a while the review process is", "another, different question > “thanks!” or “me too!” responses > * exact", "There have been complaints in the past about moderators reacting to these flags", "the past about moderators reacting to these flags by deleting the answer (e.g.,", "goes through a community review process. Every once in a while the review", "The help center provides some [guidance about deleting answers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/deleted-answers) > > Answers that", "moderator attention where a moderator needs to decide if the answer should be", "Answers that do not fundamentally answer the question may be removed. This includes", "more than a partial answer to the actual question that have resulted in", "where a moderator needs to decide if the answer should be deleted. There" ]
[ "[the US admissions process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly) for students with a weak background. However, I’m beginning", "question for the UK and German systems as well. It seems we get", "we get a decent number of questions [such as this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ) that it", "students with a weak background. However, I’m beginning to wonder if we need", "It seems we get a decent number of questions [such as this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ)", "We already have a question that outlines [the US admissions process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly) for students", "number of questions [such as this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ) that it makes some sense to", "well. It seems we get a decent number of questions [such as this", "decent number of questions [such as this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ) that it makes some sense", "a similar question for the UK and German systems as well. It seems", "get a decent number of questions [such as this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ) that it makes", "German systems as well. It seems we get a decent number of questions", "admissions process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly) for students with a weak background. However, I’m beginning to wonder", "the UK and German systems as well. It seems we get a decent", "have a question that outlines [the US admissions process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly) for students with a", "for students with a weak background. However, I’m beginning to wonder if we", "this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ) that it makes some sense to have a community wiki-type question", "I’m beginning to wonder if we need a similar question for the UK", "seems we get a decent number of questions [such as this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ) that", "if we need a similar question for the UK and German systems as", "need a similar question for the UK and German systems as well. It", "question that outlines [the US admissions process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly) for students with a weak background.", "wonder if we need a similar question for the UK and German systems", "to wonder if we need a similar question for the UK and German", "of questions [such as this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ) that it makes some sense to have", "and German systems as well. It seems we get a decent number of", "already have a question that outlines [the US admissions process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly) for students with", "However, I’m beginning to wonder if we need a similar question for the", "process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly) for students with a weak background. However, I’m beginning to wonder if", "UK and German systems as well. It seems we get a decent number", "questions [such as this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ) that it makes some sense to have a", "beginning to wonder if we need a similar question for the UK and", "similar question for the UK and German systems as well. It seems we", "a decent number of questions [such as this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ) that it makes some", "systems as well. It seems we get a decent number of questions [such", "outlines [the US admissions process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly) for students with a weak background. However, I’m", "we need a similar question for the UK and German systems as well.", "that outlines [the US admissions process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly) for students with a weak background. However,", "a question that outlines [the US admissions process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly) for students with a weak", "background. However, I’m beginning to wonder if we need a similar question for", "US admissions process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly) for students with a weak background. However, I’m beginning to", "as well. It seems we get a decent number of questions [such as", "a weak background. However, I’m beginning to wonder if we need a similar", "as this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ) that it makes some sense to have a community wiki-type", "with a weak background. However, I’m beginning to wonder if we need a", "one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ) that it makes some sense to have a community wiki-type question available.", "weak background. However, I’m beginning to wonder if we need a similar question", "[such as this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102472/what-are-my-chances-of-being-accepted-for-masters-degree-in-german-or-dutch-univ) that it makes some sense to have a community", "for the UK and German systems as well. It seems we get a" ]
[ "nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319) I think it's ridiculous this gets over 60 upvotes within a couple", "upvote. Am I wrong to perceive this as anomalous, or undesirable? Edit: Trivial", "university, so do nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319) I think it's ridiculous this gets over 60 upvotes", "upvoted, as if I've found a cure for cancer. Here's a recent example:", "student comments about her lectures. What should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319) A: [You're not even", "while, say, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319) have barely a single upvote. Am", "much by varigated experience. And if I have an answer for those, I'm", "Q: [Professor is upset about student comments about her lectures. What should I", "empathy, and are helped much by varigated experience. And if I have an", "the site which require thought, and empathy, and are helped much by varigated", "about her lectures. What should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319) A: [You're not even in the", "of days while, say, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319) have barely a single", "or undesirable? Edit: Trivial answers [win again](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/103566/7319)... reputation for nothing, badges for [free](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_for_Nothing_%28song%29).", "do). But quite a few questions on the site really seem to me", "really seem to me like \"There's a hole in the bucket, dear Liza\"-type", "occasionally those get massively upvoted, as if I've found a cure for cancer.", "her lectures. What should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319) A: [You're not even in the same", "bucket, dear Liza\"-type questions. And if I provide a \"Then fix it, dear", "glad to get some upvotes (and I often do). But quite a few", "recent example: Q: [Professor is upset about student comments about her lectures. What", "the same university, so do nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319) I think it's ridiculous this gets over", "if I have an answer for those, I'm glad to get some upvotes", "same university, so do nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319) I think it's ridiculous this gets over 60", "it, dear Heqrv\" answer, occasionally those get massively upvoted, as if I've found", "hole in the bucket, dear Liza\"-type questions. And if I provide a \"Then", "if I provide a \"Then fix it, dear Heqrv\" answer, occasionally those get", "a \"Then fix it, dear Heqrv\" answer, occasionally those get massively upvoted, as", "are helped much by varigated experience. And if I have an answer for", "Heqrv\" answer, occasionally those get massively upvoted, as if I've found a cure", "not even in the same university, so do nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319) I think it's ridiculous", "gets over 60 upvotes within a couple of days while, say, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319)", "I provide a \"Then fix it, dear Heqrv\" answer, occasionally those get massively", "\"Then fix it, dear Heqrv\" answer, occasionally those get massively upvoted, as if", "like \"There's a hole in the bucket, dear Liza\"-type questions. And if I", "so do nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319) I think it's ridiculous this gets over 60 upvotes within", "[Professor is upset about student comments about her lectures. What should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319)", "require thought, and empathy, and are helped much by varigated experience. And if", "on the site which require thought, and empathy, and are helped much by", "as if I've found a cure for cancer. Here's a recent example: Q:", "questions. And if I provide a \"Then fix it, dear Heqrv\" answer, occasionally", "as anomalous, or undesirable? Edit: Trivial answers [win again](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/103566/7319)... reputation for nothing, badges", "often do). But quite a few questions on the site really seem to", "seem to me like \"There's a hole in the bucket, dear Liza\"-type questions.", "cancer. Here's a recent example: Q: [Professor is upset about student comments about", "[You're not even in the same university, so do nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319) I think it's", "one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319) have barely a single upvote. Am I wrong to perceive this as", "cure for cancer. Here's a recent example: Q: [Professor is upset about student", "which require thought, and empathy, and are helped much by varigated experience. And", "Here's a recent example: Q: [Professor is upset about student comments about her", "this as anomalous, or undesirable? Edit: Trivial answers [win again](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/103566/7319)... reputation for nothing,", "questions on the site really seem to me like \"There's a hole in", "Am I wrong to perceive this as anomalous, or undesirable? Edit: Trivial answers", "me like \"There's a hole in the bucket, dear Liza\"-type questions. And if", "a single upvote. Am I wrong to perceive this as anomalous, or undesirable?", "read questions here on the site which require thought, and empathy, and are", "it's ridiculous this gets over 60 upvotes within a couple of days while,", "upset about student comments about her lectures. What should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319) A: [You're", "dear Liza\"-type questions. And if I provide a \"Then fix it, dear Heqrv\"", "about student comments about her lectures. What should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319) A: [You're not", "do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319) A: [You're not even in the same university, so do nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319) I", "an answer for those, I'm glad to get some upvotes (and I often", "And if I provide a \"Then fix it, dear Heqrv\" answer, occasionally those", "fix it, dear Heqrv\" answer, occasionally those get massively upvoted, as if I've", "couple of days while, say, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319) have barely a", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319) have barely a single upvote. Am I wrong to", "I often do). But quite a few questions on the site really seem", "in the same university, so do nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319) I think it's ridiculous this gets", "upvotes within a couple of days while, say, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319)", "to get some upvotes (and I often do). But quite a few questions", "get some upvotes (and I often do). But quite a few questions on", "barely a single upvote. Am I wrong to perceive this as anomalous, or", "\"There's a hole in the bucket, dear Liza\"-type questions. And if I provide", "60 upvotes within a couple of days while, say, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319) or [this", "I wrong to perceive this as anomalous, or undesirable? Edit: Trivial answers [win", "anomalous, or undesirable? Edit: Trivial answers [win again](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/103566/7319)... reputation for nothing, badges for", "site really seem to me like \"There's a hole in the bucket, dear", "answer for those, I'm glad to get some upvotes (and I often do).", "And if I have an answer for those, I'm glad to get some", "to perceive this as anomalous, or undesirable? Edit: Trivial answers [win again](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/103566/7319)... reputation", "[this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319) have barely a single upvote. Am I wrong to perceive this", "the site really seem to me like \"There's a hole in the bucket,", "found a cure for cancer. Here's a recent example: Q: [Professor is upset", "upvotes (and I often do). But quite a few questions on the site", "questions here on the site which require thought, and empathy, and are helped", "answer, occasionally those get massively upvoted, as if I've found a cure for", "comments about her lectures. What should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319) A: [You're not even in", "those, I'm glad to get some upvotes (and I often do). But quite", "varigated experience. And if I have an answer for those, I'm glad to", "here on the site which require thought, and empathy, and are helped much", "get massively upvoted, as if I've found a cure for cancer. Here's a", "this gets over 60 upvotes within a couple of days while, say, [this", "have barely a single upvote. Am I wrong to perceive this as anomalous,", "site which require thought, and empathy, and are helped much by varigated experience.", "thought, and empathy, and are helped much by varigated experience. And if I", "or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319) have barely a single upvote. Am I wrong to perceive", "wrong to perceive this as anomalous, or undesirable? Edit: Trivial answers [win again](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/103566/7319)...", "say, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319) have barely a single upvote. Am I", "even in the same university, so do nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319) I think it's ridiculous this", "by varigated experience. And if I have an answer for those, I'm glad", "I've found a cure for cancer. Here's a recent example: Q: [Professor is", "if I've found a cure for cancer. Here's a recent example: Q: [Professor", "have an answer for those, I'm glad to get some upvotes (and I", "a recent example: Q: [Professor is upset about student comments about her lectures.", "think it's ridiculous this gets over 60 upvotes within a couple of days", "But quite a few questions on the site really seem to me like", "perceive this as anomalous, or undesirable? Edit: Trivial answers [win again](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/103566/7319)... reputation for", "should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319) A: [You're not even in the same university, so do", "What should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319) A: [You're not even in the same university, so", "a few questions on the site really seem to me like \"There's a", "massively upvoted, as if I've found a cure for cancer. Here's a recent", "I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319) A: [You're not even in the same university, so do nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319)", "a cure for cancer. Here's a recent example: Q: [Professor is upset about", "I have an answer for those, I'm glad to get some upvotes (and", "over 60 upvotes within a couple of days while, say, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319) or", "provide a \"Then fix it, dear Heqrv\" answer, occasionally those get massively upvoted,", "single upvote. Am I wrong to perceive this as anomalous, or undesirable? Edit:", "I read questions here on the site which require thought, and empathy, and", "a hole in the bucket, dear Liza\"-type questions. And if I provide a", "those get massively upvoted, as if I've found a cure for cancer. Here's", "within a couple of days while, say, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319) have", "for those, I'm glad to get some upvotes (and I often do). But", "dear Heqrv\" answer, occasionally those get massively upvoted, as if I've found a", "for cancer. Here's a recent example: Q: [Professor is upset about student comments", "[this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319) have barely a single upvote. Am I wrong", "a couple of days while, say, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319) have barely", "example: Q: [Professor is upset about student comments about her lectures. What should", "days while, say, [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/84938/7319) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/96147/7319) have barely a single upvote.", "to me like \"There's a hole in the bucket, dear Liza\"-type questions. And", "few questions on the site really seem to me like \"There's a hole", "on the site really seem to me like \"There's a hole in the", "lectures. What should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319) A: [You're not even in the same university,", "I'm glad to get some upvotes (and I often do). But quite a", "(and I often do). But quite a few questions on the site really", "some upvotes (and I often do). But quite a few questions on the", "ridiculous this gets over 60 upvotes within a couple of days while, say,", "A: [You're not even in the same university, so do nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319) I think", "the bucket, dear Liza\"-type questions. And if I provide a \"Then fix it,", "experience. And if I have an answer for those, I'm glad to get", "in the bucket, dear Liza\"-type questions. And if I provide a \"Then fix", "Sometimes I read questions here on the site which require thought, and empathy,", "Liza\"-type questions. And if I provide a \"Then fix it, dear Heqrv\" answer,", "I think it's ridiculous this gets over 60 upvotes within a couple of", "helped much by varigated experience. And if I have an answer for those,", "is upset about student comments about her lectures. What should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/102757/7319) A:", "and empathy, and are helped much by varigated experience. And if I have", "and are helped much by varigated experience. And if I have an answer", "quite a few questions on the site really seem to me like \"There's", "do nothing.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/102793/7319) I think it's ridiculous this gets over 60 upvotes within a" ]
[ "form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ```", "cycle these, but for this year it'll be once again, so we'll be", "Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on", "addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the", "advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form.", "twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs ", "a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and will", "in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process.", "If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The", "mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything else to", "Please do not add anything else to the body of the post. If", "to this question must* conform to the following rules, or they will be", "show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of", "the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while", "a way to promote information and resources that are relevant to your own", "it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the", "are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the", "vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable", "we'll be refreshing the Community Promotion Ads* for this year now! ### What", "almost February in 2018, which isn't supposed to be the proper time to", "hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG", "If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and", "exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to this question", "cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material", "as a way to promote information and resources that are relevant to your", "x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. Must be hosted", "* The image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or", "way to promote information and resources that are relevant to your own community's", "create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI.", "300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. Must be", "stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a way to promote", " cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be", "a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to", "* Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit", "for future visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems important.", "Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on", "'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag", "can check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click", "be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. * Must", "the post. If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments.", "is a method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors", "it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold** an answer must", "a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post", "limit on file size of 150 KB * If the background of the", "interests, both for those already in the community and those yet to join.", "served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things.", "community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right", "the background of the image is white or partially white, there must be", "serves as a way to promote information and resources that are relevant to", "Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in", "in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from", "every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad", "else to the body of the post*. If you want to discuss something,", "the site's twitter account academic websites and resources * interesting campus story", "restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service", "we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the", "be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the", "both for those already in the community and those yet to join. ###", "Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane", "this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled", "the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does", "to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following things:", "refreshing the Community Promotion Ads for this year now! ### What are Community", "community and will continue to be so, it is a good idea to", "once again, so we'll be refreshing the Community Promotion Ads for this year", "a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will", "minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be", "out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click stats [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/ads/display/3961).", "the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a way to", "advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This", "the body of the post*. If you want to discuss something, do it", "to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year", "service or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to", "white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it.", "the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For", "resources interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything", "are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show", "the proper time to cycle these, but for this year it'll be once", "to the body of the post*. If you want to discuss something, do", "community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion", "question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community", "new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the", "genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out", "uploader (imgur) Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs ", "might promote the following things: the site's twitter account * academic websites", "score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown", "for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the", "other things will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting", "Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently", "the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with", "pixels, or double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our", "Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main", "Promotion Ads for this year now! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community", "of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to", "in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset", "answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the main", "community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we", "an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the", "image is white or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px", "(currently 6*) before it will be shown on the main site. You can", "ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions", "they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form", "required form. ### Image requirements The image that you create must be", "those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year?", "years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces to show", "community deems important. This also serves as a way to promote information and", "and resources interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences ", "do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over", "be shown on the main site. You can check out the ads that", "(imgur) Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute", "the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is", "community's interests, both for those already in the community and those yet to", "will continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost it.", "in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic", "size of 150 KB If the background of the image is white", "main site. You can check out the ads that have met the threshold", "the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have", "show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything", "[1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything else to the", "the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images", "the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the", "join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will", "newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not", "subject matter of the community, but to the current status of the community.", "against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or", "information and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for", "rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the", "it a new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery", "the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be", "up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this", "campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community", "in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community,", "ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very", "Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB * If the background of", "things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just", "the community, but to the current status of the community. We reset the", "on the site. For example, you might promote the following things: * the", "add anything else to the body of the post*. If you want to", "in 2018, which isn't supposed to be the proper time to cycle these,", "site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting", "anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for", "every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things", "there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ###", "How does it work? The answers you post to this question must* conform", "this question must conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored.", "file size of 150 KB * If the background of the image is", "out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in", "will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads", "or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to be", "150 KB * If the background of the image is white or partially", "reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have", "while other things will wane to allow for new faces to show up.", "the subject matter of the community, but to the current status of the", "must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. ", "will be shown on the main site. You can check out the ads", "usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow for new", "questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements,", "on the main site. You can check out the ads that have met", "yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some", "that will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The", "The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged", "is white or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if", "### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold* an answer must meet", "1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is", "previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the", "250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through", "and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those", "December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from", "valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it is a", "our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No", "is for future visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems", "in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url", "if high DPI. Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur)", "future visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems important. This", "tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this", "example, you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account ", "of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The", "high DPI. Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) ", "question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\")", "those already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do", "have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer", "In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills", "the site. For example, you might promote the following things: the site's", "* Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be", "be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file", "on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question", "or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The", "functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the", "DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must", "you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic", "this year now! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are", "community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads", "(2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum", "Ads for this year now! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion", "discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be", "resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already", "and will continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost", "It may be helpful to give it a new face in the process,", "year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose", "[2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add anything else to the body of", "cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community", "or double that if high DPI. Must be hosted through our standard", "* academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events", "maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow for", "Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that", "the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of", "if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a *minimum score", "purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps", "ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other", "and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out", "the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads?", "Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up", "This is a method for the community to control what gets promoted to", "before it will be shown on the main site. You can check out", "services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to", "PNG No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150", "process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale", "story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community would", "Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness", "form with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that", "always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In", "promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle.", "that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if", "so we'll be refreshing the Community Promotion Ads for this year now! ###", "show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old", "the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required", "give it a new face in the process, so as to prevent the", "stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers", "very valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it is", "else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future", "to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services", "Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements", "You can check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic", "in The goal is for future visitors to find out about the stuff", "the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads", "to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep", "it is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to", "faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and", "from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable", "to your own community's interests, both for those already in the community and", "Threshold There is a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6)", "that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already in", "year now! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted", "enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form", "The goal is for future visitors to find out about the stuff your", "have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control", "be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a", "something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged", "All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show", "after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you", "meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the main site. You", "particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue", "interesting campus story blogs cool events or conferences * anything else your", "so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful", "again, so we'll be refreshing the Community Promotion Ads for this year now!", "year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will", "material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the", "have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a", "is a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it", "does it work? The answers you post to this question must conform to", "that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader", "the years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces to", "be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]:", "matter of the community, but to the current status of the community. We", "time to cycle these, but for this year it'll be once again, so", "community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to", "of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to this", "### How does it work? The answers you post to this question must", "are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ###", "http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add anything else to the body of the", "supposed to be the proper time to cycle these, but for this year", "reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad", "post to this question must* conform to the following rules, or they will", "site. You can check out the ads that have met the threshold with", "KB * If the background of the image is white or partially white,", "1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to", "[![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not", "you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high", "ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads", "face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad", "answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements The image", "but to the current status of the community. We reset the ads once", "enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion", "or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of", "will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose", "own community's interests, both for those already in the community and those yet", "events or conferences anything else your community would genuinely be interested in", "tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also", "the community and will continue to be so, it is a good idea", "of the post*. If you want to discuss something, do it in the", "is very valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it", "We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads", "for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to", "community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous", "Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site,", "the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure.", "idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new", "will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community", "to promote information and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests,", "the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but", "it will be shown on the main site. You can check out the", "do not add anything else to the body of the post. If you", "following things: the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources ", "account academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool", "``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do", "to cycle these, but for this year it'll be once again, so we'll", "control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might", "The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a", "be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ```", "ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to be so,", "a method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on", "No animated GIFs Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB ", "now! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements", "threshold* an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on", "the current status of the community. We reset the ads once a year,", "* anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is", "of the image is white or partially white, there must be a 1px", "magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality", "* the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus", "to find out about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves", "for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate", "status of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December.", "with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling", "to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always", "the image is white or partially white, there must be a 1px border", "is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give", "on file size of 150 KB * If the background of the image", "conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal", "for this year it'll be once again, so we'll be refreshing the *Community", "the main site. You can check out the ads that have met the", "things: the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting", "your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors", "to not just the subject matter of the community, but to the current", "your community deems important. This also serves as a way to promote information", "ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant", "process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the", "not add anything else to the body of the post. If you want", "a new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of", "allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps", "year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an", "of 150 KB If the background of the image is white or", "an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is", "your own community's interests, both for those already in the community and those", "also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements", "also serves as a way to promote information and resources that are relevant", "prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of", "this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ###", "the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will", "on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add anything else", "to the current status of the community. We reset the ads once a", "and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every", "just the subject matter of the community, but to the current status of", "to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should", "but for this year it'll be once again, so we'll be refreshing the", "of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above", "for those already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why", "purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are", "this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and", "so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after", "accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be", "year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to", "do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with", "the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no", "Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) Must be GIF", "above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must", "be the proper time to cycle these, but for this year it'll be", "pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements ", "high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold", "This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the", "a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it", "for this year now! ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads", "be once again, so we'll be refreshing the Community Promotion Ads* for this", "relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already in the community", "the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the", "requirements * The image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels,", "The answers you post to this question must conform to the following rules,", "do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community", "would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find", "goal is for future visitors to find out about the stuff your community", " If the background of the image is white or partially white, there", "and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do", "relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but to the", "as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a", "promote information and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both", "or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI)", "of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How", "no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular", "it'll be once again, so we'll be refreshing the Community Promotion Ads for", "the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create", "you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question", "to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you", "find out about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as", "Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the", "helpful to give it a new face in the process, so as to", "### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain", "provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why", "the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]:", "Community Promotion Ads for this year now! ### What are Community Promotion Ads?", "exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url", "must conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All", "good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a", "white or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high", "be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold", "### Image requirements * The image that you create must be 300 x", "the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be", "surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold an answer", "If the background of the image is white or partially white, there must", "\"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the", "[community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of", "from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work?", "standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated", "There is a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before", "promote the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and", "keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter", "be helpful to give it a new face in the process, so as", "out about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a", "or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact", "what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote", "to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year", "* Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB * If the background", "What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will", "### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for", "work? The answers you post to this question must conform to the following", "their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This", "tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to", "about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a way", "method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the", "* No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB", "main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the", "conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers", "to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add", "will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow", "important. This also serves as a way to promote information and resources that", "be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition", "must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag.", "already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we", "Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control what gets", "anything else to the body of the post. If you want to discuss", "be refreshing the Community Promotion Ads** for this year now! ### What are", "GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size", "The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements", "to be the proper time to cycle these, but for this year it'll", "imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ###", "websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences", "Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the", "once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against", "answers you post to this question must conform to the following rules, or", "through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG ", "shown on the main site. You can check out the ads that have", "that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for", "February in 2018, which isn't supposed to be the proper time to cycle", "ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If", "question must* conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1.", "with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you", "image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that", "This also serves as a way to promote information and resources that are", "must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the main site.", "Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control what", "to give it a new face in the process, so as to prevent", "the Community Promotion Ads for this year now! ### What are Community Promotion", "advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar.", "ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it", "must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score", "every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their", "academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or", "background of the image is white or partially white, there must be a", "things will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the", "double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image", "gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the", "wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every", "image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs", "2018, which isn't supposed to be the proper time to cycle these, but", "fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads", "site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs", "to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer", "be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out about", "animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB * If", "shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method", "comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show", "repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new face in", "for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site.", "Ads? This is a method for the community to control what gets promoted", "continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It", "the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The", "want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must", "should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2]", "these, but for this year it'll be once again, so we'll be refreshing", "this year it'll be once again, so we'll be refreshing the *Community Promotion", "of the community, but to the current status of the community. We reset", "up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads", "partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding", "helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to", "following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in", "be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) Must be GIF or", "form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must be 300", "ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but to", "ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline", "promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following", "2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions", "ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served", "body of the post*. If you want to discuss something, do it in", "community, but to the current status of the community. We reset the ads", "of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please", "old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher", "The image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double", "proper time to cycle these, but for this year it'll be once again,", "current status of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every", "Image requirements The image that you create must be 300 x 250", "new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this,", "allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for", "is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting", "it work? The answers you post to this question must conform to the", "of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided,", "voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have", "a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting", "it. It may be helpful to give it a new face in the", "will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of:", "post*. If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2.", "border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a", "not just the subject matter of the community, but to the current status", "reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years,", "site. For example, you might promote the following things: the site's twitter", "visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following things: ", "``` Please do not add anything else to the body of the post.", " interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else", "advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown.", "check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click stats", "to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is", "right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of", "the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community", "are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already in the", "6) before it will be shown on the main site. You can check", "isn't supposed to be the proper time to cycle these, but for this", "visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems important. This also", "cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested", "http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add anything else to the body", "GIFs Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB * If the", "the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting", "a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There", "to be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may", "tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image", "you post to this question must conform to the following rules, or they", "It's almost February in 2018, which isn't supposed to be the proper time", "helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject", "For example, you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account", "answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on", "interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out about the", "to the community and will continue to be so, it is a good", "to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows", "DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold* an", "to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new face", "community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example,", "over the years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces", "may be helpful to give it a new face in the process, so", "blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely", "sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the", "which isn't supposed to be the proper time to cycle these, but for", "year it'll be once again, so we'll be refreshing the Community Promotion Ads", "getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The", "we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to", "be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may be", "the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources", "deems important*. This also serves as a way to promote information and resources", "### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that" ]
[ "PhD in Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1) received two close votes (among the other votes) for the", "> > > The question is about political implications of getting a PhD", "infulence my career if I get a PhD in Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1) received two close", "votes) for the following reason: > > \"\"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or", "> information.)\". > > > The question is about political implications of getting", "or > comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion for more", "career if I get a PhD in Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1) received two close votes (among", "academic programs, publishers, journals, > research topics or similar as an answer or", "an answer or seek an assessment or > comparison of such, are off-topic", "as an answer or seek an assessment or > comparison of such, are", "a PhD from a specific country. Does it qualify as a shopping question?", "information.)\". > > > The question is about political implications of getting a", "> > The question is about political implications of getting a PhD from", "of Israel (BDS) infulence my career if I get a PhD in Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1)", "which seek recommendations or lists of > individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals,", "version of this question [How will the academic boycot of Israel (BDS) infulence", "\"\"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of > individual universities, academic programs,", "programs, publishers, journals, > research topics or similar as an answer or seek", "this discussion for more > information.)\". > > > The question is about", "(See this discussion for more > information.)\". > > > The question is", "discussion for more > information.)\". > > > The question is about political", "or seek an assessment or > comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See", "political implications of getting a PhD from a specific country. Does it qualify", "seek an assessment or > comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this", "in Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1) received two close votes (among the other votes) for the following", "following reason: > > \"\"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of >", "about political implications of getting a PhD from a specific country. Does it", "of > individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, > research topics or similar", "similar as an answer or seek an assessment or > comparison of such,", "implications of getting a PhD from a specific country. Does it qualify as", "is about political implications of getting a PhD from a specific country. Does", "boycot of Israel (BDS) infulence my career if I get a PhD in", "comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion for more > information.)\".", "for the following reason: > > \"\"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists", "the other votes) for the following reason: > > \"\"Shopping\" questions, which seek", "> comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion for more >", "get a PhD in Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1) received two close votes (among the other votes)", "Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1) received two close votes (among the other votes) for the following reason:", "universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, > research topics or similar as an answer", "The question is about political implications of getting a PhD from a specific", "(among the other votes) for the following reason: > > \"\"Shopping\" questions, which", "a PhD in Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1) received two close votes (among the other votes) for", "this question [How will the academic boycot of Israel (BDS) infulence my career", "I get a PhD in Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1) received two close votes (among the other", "here. (See this discussion for more > information.)\". > > > The question", "publishers, journals, > research topics or similar as an answer or seek an", "research topics or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or >", "getting a PhD from a specific country. Does it qualify as a shopping", "> The question is about political implications of getting a PhD from a", "will the academic boycot of Israel (BDS) infulence my career if I get", "Israel (BDS) infulence my career if I get a PhD in Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1) received", "questions, which seek recommendations or lists of > individual universities, academic programs, publishers,", "or lists of > individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, > research topics", "of such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion for more > information.)\". >", "two close votes (among the other votes) for the following reason: > >", "original version of this question [How will the academic boycot of Israel (BDS)", "> research topics or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or", "off-topic here. (See this discussion for more > information.)\". > > > The", "(BDS) infulence my career if I get a PhD in Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1) received two", "of this question [How will the academic boycot of Israel (BDS) infulence my", "other votes) for the following reason: > > \"\"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations", "my career if I get a PhD in Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1) received two close votes", "votes (among the other votes) for the following reason: > > \"\"Shopping\" questions,", "lists of > individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, > research topics or", "> individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, > research topics or similar as", "question [How will the academic boycot of Israel (BDS) infulence my career if", "more > information.)\". > > > The question is about political implications of", "such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion for more > information.)\". > >", "> \"\"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of > individual universities, academic", "or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or > comparison of", "[How will the academic boycot of Israel (BDS) infulence my career if I", "assessment or > comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion for", "for more > information.)\". > > > The question is about political implications", "of getting a PhD from a specific country. Does it qualify as a", "if I get a PhD in Israel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/102886/1) received two close votes (among the", "the following reason: > > \"\"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of", "> > \"\"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of > individual universities,", "journals, > research topics or similar as an answer or seek an assessment", "The original version of this question [How will the academic boycot of Israel", "question is about political implications of getting a PhD from a specific country.", "an assessment or > comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion", "close votes (among the other votes) for the following reason: > > \"\"Shopping\"", "individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, > research topics or similar as an", "answer or seek an assessment or > comparison of such, are off-topic here.", "academic boycot of Israel (BDS) infulence my career if I get a PhD", "seek recommendations or lists of > individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, >", "topics or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or > comparison", "reason: > > \"\"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of > individual", "the academic boycot of Israel (BDS) infulence my career if I get a", "are off-topic here. (See this discussion for more > information.)\". > > >", "received two close votes (among the other votes) for the following reason: >", "recommendations or lists of > individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, > research" ]
[ "Does the questioner wanting a different answer mean that they necessarily asked the", "their face, and have answers that align with my expectations, but in both", "much weight should authorial intent of the questioner be given in these cases?", "questions back-to-back that were flagged as \"unclear\". [These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments) [questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea) seem well-articulated on their", "intent of the questioner be given in these cases? Does the questioner wanting", "asked the wrong question? Or are there other reasons to close these questions?", "with my expectations, but in both the questioner is expressing vehement dislike of", "back-to-back that were flagged as \"unclear\". [These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments) [questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea) seem well-articulated on their face,", "two questions back-to-back that were flagged as \"unclear\". [These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments) [questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea) seem well-articulated on", "that align with my expectations, but in both the questioner is expressing vehement", "the answers in the comments. How much weight should authorial intent of the", "should authorial intent of the questioner be given in these cases? Does the", "I just noticed two questions back-to-back that were flagged as \"unclear\". [These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments) [questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea)", "align with my expectations, but in both the questioner is expressing vehement dislike", "is expressing vehement dislike of the answers in the comments. How much weight", "that were flagged as \"unclear\". [These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments) [questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea) seem well-articulated on their face, and", "noticed two questions back-to-back that were flagged as \"unclear\". [These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments) [questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea) seem well-articulated", "dislike of the answers in the comments. How much weight should authorial intent", "these cases? Does the questioner wanting a different answer mean that they necessarily", "cases? Does the questioner wanting a different answer mean that they necessarily asked", "wanting a different answer mean that they necessarily asked the wrong question? Or", "in both the questioner is expressing vehement dislike of the answers in the", "but in both the questioner is expressing vehement dislike of the answers in", "weight should authorial intent of the questioner be given in these cases? Does", "be given in these cases? Does the questioner wanting a different answer mean", "a different answer mean that they necessarily asked the wrong question? Or are", "that they necessarily asked the wrong question? Or are there other reasons to", "the questioner is expressing vehement dislike of the answers in the comments. How", "expressing vehement dislike of the answers in the comments. How much weight should", "the questioner be given in these cases? Does the questioner wanting a different", "different answer mean that they necessarily asked the wrong question? Or are there", "the review queue, I just noticed two questions back-to-back that were flagged as", "as \"unclear\". [These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments) [questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea) seem well-articulated on their face, and have answers that", "\"unclear\". [These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments) [questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea) seem well-articulated on their face, and have answers that align", "flagged as \"unclear\". [These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments) [questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea) seem well-articulated on their face, and have answers", "vehement dislike of the answers in the comments. How much weight should authorial", "questioner wanting a different answer mean that they necessarily asked the wrong question?", "questioner be given in these cases? Does the questioner wanting a different answer", "[These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments) [questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea) seem well-articulated on their face, and have answers that align with", "both the questioner is expressing vehement dislike of the answers in the comments.", "mean that they necessarily asked the wrong question? Or are there other reasons", "the questioner wanting a different answer mean that they necessarily asked the wrong", "necessarily asked the wrong question? Or are there other reasons to close these", "just noticed two questions back-to-back that were flagged as \"unclear\". [These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments) [questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea) seem", "authorial intent of the questioner be given in these cases? Does the questioner", "of the answers in the comments. How much weight should authorial intent of", "review queue, I just noticed two questions back-to-back that were flagged as \"unclear\".", "of the questioner be given in these cases? Does the questioner wanting a", "have answers that align with my expectations, but in both the questioner is", "well-articulated on their face, and have answers that align with my expectations, but", "answer mean that they necessarily asked the wrong question? Or are there other", "queue, I just noticed two questions back-to-back that were flagged as \"unclear\". [These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments)", "the comments. How much weight should authorial intent of the questioner be given", "going through the review queue, I just noticed two questions back-to-back that were", "answers that align with my expectations, but in both the questioner is expressing", "and have answers that align with my expectations, but in both the questioner", "face, and have answers that align with my expectations, but in both the", "my expectations, but in both the questioner is expressing vehement dislike of the", "answers in the comments. How much weight should authorial intent of the questioner", "comments. How much weight should authorial intent of the questioner be given in", "were flagged as \"unclear\". [These](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103009/what-are-the-most-credible-rankings-of-us-computer-science-departments) [questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea) seem well-articulated on their face, and have", "While going through the review queue, I just noticed two questions back-to-back that", "through the review queue, I just noticed two questions back-to-back that were flagged", "in the comments. How much weight should authorial intent of the questioner be", "questioner is expressing vehement dislike of the answers in the comments. How much", "How much weight should authorial intent of the questioner be given in these", "seem well-articulated on their face, and have answers that align with my expectations,", "expectations, but in both the questioner is expressing vehement dislike of the answers", "given in these cases? Does the questioner wanting a different answer mean that", "they necessarily asked the wrong question? Or are there other reasons to close", "on their face, and have answers that align with my expectations, but in", "[questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102869/most-efficient-way-of-finding-out-if-someone-has-already-published-your-idea) seem well-articulated on their face, and have answers that align with my", "in these cases? Does the questioner wanting a different answer mean that they" ]
[ "answer - I'm unsure whether they would do it. 2. Compile an answer", "questions\" section, and I found many questions which had good answeres - but", "and I found many questions which had good answeres - but those were", "but those were given as comments. Some of them are very short, but", "the question, read the comments ant feel like there is no more to", "options: 1. ask the commentators to write their comment as answer - I'm", "their comment as answer - I'm unsure whether they would do it. 2.", "the original commenter did not want to post a one-liner as answer. Unfortunately,", "\"open\" and is more or less a click bait since people read the", "more to say without repeating the comments. I see two options: 1. ask", "a click bait since people read the question, read the comments ant feel", "was browsing through the \"unanswered questions\" section, and I found many questions which", "I was browsing through the \"unanswered questions\" section, and I found many questions", "2. Compile an answer from the comments given. This feels a bit like", "like there is no more to say without repeating the comments. I see", "I found many questions which had good answeres - but those were given", "remains \"open\" and is more or less a click bait since people read", "click bait since people read the question, read the comments ant feel like", "the comments. I see two options: 1. ask the commentators to write their", "1. ask the commentators to write their comment as answer - I'm unsure", "is no more to say without repeating the comments. I see two options:", "it. 2. Compile an answer from the comments given. This feels a bit", "bit like plagiarism (of course you should cite them) What's your thoughts about", "ant feel like there is no more to say without repeating the comments.", "a valid and sometimes satisfying answer, so maybe the original commenter did not", "less a click bait since people read the question, read the comments ant", "maybe the original commenter did not want to post a one-liner as answer.", "answer, so maybe the original commenter did not want to post a one-liner", "from the comments given. This feels a bit like plagiarism (of course you", "them are very short, but still a valid and sometimes satisfying answer, so", "unsure whether they would do it. 2. Compile an answer from the comments", "do it. 2. Compile an answer from the comments given. This feels a", "since people read the question, read the comments ant feel like there is", "browsing through the \"unanswered questions\" section, and I found many questions which had", "commentators to write their comment as answer - I'm unsure whether they would", "- but those were given as comments. Some of them are very short,", "post a one-liner as answer. Unfortunately, the question remains \"open\" and is more", "write their comment as answer - I'm unsure whether they would do it.", "feel like there is no more to say without repeating the comments. I", "like plagiarism (of course you should cite them) What's your thoughts about this", "answeres - but those were given as comments. Some of them are very", "a bit like plagiarism (of course you should cite them) What's your thoughts", "answer. Unfortunately, the question remains \"open\" and is more or less a click", "there is no more to say without repeating the comments. I see two", "more or less a click bait since people read the question, read the", "given as comments. Some of them are very short, but still a valid", "answer from the comments given. This feels a bit like plagiarism (of course", "the \"unanswered questions\" section, and I found many questions which had good answeres", "read the comments ant feel like there is no more to say without", "comments ant feel like there is no more to say without repeating the", "comments. Some of them are very short, but still a valid and sometimes", "to say without repeating the comments. I see two options: 1. ask the", "so maybe the original commenter did not want to post a one-liner as", "as answer - I'm unsure whether they would do it. 2. Compile an", "question remains \"open\" and is more or less a click bait since people", "Unfortunately, the question remains \"open\" and is more or less a click bait", "question, read the comments ant feel like there is no more to say", "comments. I see two options: 1. ask the commentators to write their comment", "questions which had good answeres - but those were given as comments. Some", "good answeres - but those were given as comments. Some of them are", "read the question, read the comments ant feel like there is no more", "not want to post a one-liner as answer. Unfortunately, the question remains \"open\"", "and sometimes satisfying answer, so maybe the original commenter did not want to", "found many questions which had good answeres - but those were given as", "want to post a one-liner as answer. Unfortunately, the question remains \"open\" and", "through the \"unanswered questions\" section, and I found many questions which had good", "Some of them are very short, but still a valid and sometimes satisfying", "they would do it. 2. Compile an answer from the comments given. This", "comment as answer - I'm unsure whether they would do it. 2. Compile", "the comments given. This feels a bit like plagiarism (of course you should", "were given as comments. Some of them are very short, but still a", "whether they would do it. 2. Compile an answer from the comments given.", "still a valid and sometimes satisfying answer, so maybe the original commenter did", "and is more or less a click bait since people read the question,", "to post a one-liner as answer. Unfortunately, the question remains \"open\" and is", "without repeating the comments. I see two options: 1. ask the commentators to", "which had good answeres - but those were given as comments. Some of", "a one-liner as answer. Unfortunately, the question remains \"open\" and is more or", "sometimes satisfying answer, so maybe the original commenter did not want to post", "no more to say without repeating the comments. I see two options: 1.", "two options: 1. ask the commentators to write their comment as answer -", "as comments. Some of them are very short, but still a valid and", "repeating the comments. I see two options: 1. ask the commentators to write", "feels a bit like plagiarism (of course you should cite them) What's your", "one-liner as answer. Unfortunately, the question remains \"open\" and is more or less", "This feels a bit like plagiarism (of course you should cite them) What's", "section, and I found many questions which had good answeres - but those", "to write their comment as answer - I'm unsure whether they would do", "are very short, but still a valid and sometimes satisfying answer, so maybe", "very short, but still a valid and sometimes satisfying answer, so maybe the", "Compile an answer from the comments given. This feels a bit like plagiarism", "people read the question, read the comments ant feel like there is no", "see two options: 1. ask the commentators to write their comment as answer", "comments given. This feels a bit like plagiarism (of course you should cite", "did not want to post a one-liner as answer. Unfortunately, the question remains", "satisfying answer, so maybe the original commenter did not want to post a", "or less a click bait since people read the question, read the comments", "- I'm unsure whether they would do it. 2. Compile an answer from", "had good answeres - but those were given as comments. Some of them", "commenter did not want to post a one-liner as answer. Unfortunately, the question", "given. This feels a bit like plagiarism (of course you should cite them)", "those were given as comments. Some of them are very short, but still", "many questions which had good answeres - but those were given as comments.", "original commenter did not want to post a one-liner as answer. Unfortunately, the", "say without repeating the comments. I see two options: 1. ask the commentators", "the commentators to write their comment as answer - I'm unsure whether they", "would do it. 2. Compile an answer from the comments given. This feels", "bait since people read the question, read the comments ant feel like there", "as answer. Unfortunately, the question remains \"open\" and is more or less a", "the question remains \"open\" and is more or less a click bait since", "of them are very short, but still a valid and sometimes satisfying answer,", "Recently I was browsing through the \"unanswered questions\" section, and I found many", "valid and sometimes satisfying answer, so maybe the original commenter did not want", "is more or less a click bait since people read the question, read", "plagiarism (of course you should cite them) What's your thoughts about this issue?", "an answer from the comments given. This feels a bit like plagiarism (of", "\"unanswered questions\" section, and I found many questions which had good answeres -", "but still a valid and sometimes satisfying answer, so maybe the original commenter", "I see two options: 1. ask the commentators to write their comment as", "short, but still a valid and sometimes satisfying answer, so maybe the original", "ask the commentators to write their comment as answer - I'm unsure whether", "the comments ant feel like there is no more to say without repeating", "I'm unsure whether they would do it. 2. Compile an answer from the" ]
[ "the side bar. As far, as I understand, \"late answers\" (and, by extension,", "\"This question is from 2012, do you really want to answer it?\" might", "bar. As far, as I understand, \"late answers\" (and, by extension, comments) are", "question from 2012, because I did not notice it was so old. Incidentally,", "question is from 2012, do you really want to answer it?\" might help.", "it?\" might help. 2. Would it make sense to filter the questions that", "one click away from commenting on a question from 2012, because I did", "on. I would not suggest disabling commenting on them. I suggest some kind", "some kind of a visual clue. 1. A deeper shade of background. Of", "shade of background. Of a JS-popup \"This question is from 2012, do you", "are frowned on. I would not suggest disabling commenting on them. I suggest", "As far, as I understand, \"late answers\" (and, by extension, comments) are frowned", "I suggest some kind of a visual clue. 1. A deeper shade of", "might help. 2. Would it make sense to filter the questions that pop", "of background. Of a JS-popup \"This question is from 2012, do you really", "a JS-popup \"This question is from 2012, do you really want to answer", "second ago I was one click away from commenting on a question from", "from 2012, do you really want to answer it?\" might help. 2. Would", "of a visual clue. 1. A deeper shade of background. Of a JS-popup", "by extension, comments) are frowned on. I would not suggest disabling commenting on", "visual clue. 1. A deeper shade of background. Of a JS-popup \"This question", "because I did not notice it was so old. Incidentally, I stumbled upon", "far, as I understand, \"late answers\" (and, by extension, comments) are frowned on.", "do you really want to answer it?\" might help. 2. Would it make", "as I understand, \"late answers\" (and, by extension, comments) are frowned on. I", "comments) are frowned on. I would not suggest disabling commenting on them. I", "clue. 1. A deeper shade of background. Of a JS-popup \"This question is", "A second ago I was one click away from commenting on a question", "I was one click away from commenting on a question from 2012, because", "from 2012, because I did not notice it was so old. Incidentally, I", "from commenting on a question from 2012, because I did not notice it", "\"late answers\" (and, by extension, comments) are frowned on. I would not suggest", "I did not notice it was so old. Incidentally, I stumbled upon it", "is from 2012, do you really want to answer it?\" might help. 2.", "suggest some kind of a visual clue. 1. A deeper shade of background.", "really want to answer it?\" might help. 2. Would it make sense to", "1. A deeper shade of background. Of a JS-popup \"This question is from", "it make sense to filter the questions that pop into sidebars by age?", "(and, by extension, comments) are frowned on. I would not suggest disabling commenting", "help. 2. Would it make sense to filter the questions that pop into", "via the side bar. As far, as I understand, \"late answers\" (and, by", "want to answer it?\" might help. 2. Would it make sense to filter", "JS-popup \"This question is from 2012, do you really want to answer it?\"", "answers\" (and, by extension, comments) are frowned on. I would not suggest disabling", "a question from 2012, because I did not notice it was so old.", "was so old. Incidentally, I stumbled upon it via the side bar. As", "was one click away from commenting on a question from 2012, because I", "away from commenting on a question from 2012, because I did not notice", "kind of a visual clue. 1. A deeper shade of background. Of a", "frowned on. I would not suggest disabling commenting on them. I suggest some", "did not notice it was so old. Incidentally, I stumbled upon it via", "so old. Incidentally, I stumbled upon it via the side bar. As far,", "2012, do you really want to answer it?\" might help. 2. Would it", "deeper shade of background. Of a JS-popup \"This question is from 2012, do", "background. Of a JS-popup \"This question is from 2012, do you really want", "click away from commenting on a question from 2012, because I did not", "stumbled upon it via the side bar. As far, as I understand, \"late", "to answer it?\" might help. 2. Would it make sense to filter the", "them. I suggest some kind of a visual clue. 1. A deeper shade", "notice it was so old. Incidentally, I stumbled upon it via the side", "on a question from 2012, because I did not notice it was so", "old. Incidentally, I stumbled upon it via the side bar. As far, as", "Incidentally, I stumbled upon it via the side bar. As far, as I", "Would it make sense to filter the questions that pop into sidebars by", "would not suggest disabling commenting on them. I suggest some kind of a", "suggest disabling commenting on them. I suggest some kind of a visual clue.", "A deeper shade of background. Of a JS-popup \"This question is from 2012,", "it was so old. Incidentally, I stumbled upon it via the side bar.", "Of a JS-popup \"This question is from 2012, do you really want to", "understand, \"late answers\" (and, by extension, comments) are frowned on. I would not", "on them. I suggest some kind of a visual clue. 1. A deeper", "ago I was one click away from commenting on a question from 2012,", "not suggest disabling commenting on them. I suggest some kind of a visual", "commenting on a question from 2012, because I did not notice it was", "I stumbled upon it via the side bar. As far, as I understand,", "upon it via the side bar. As far, as I understand, \"late answers\"", "I understand, \"late answers\" (and, by extension, comments) are frowned on. I would", "a visual clue. 1. A deeper shade of background. Of a JS-popup \"This", "you really want to answer it?\" might help. 2. Would it make sense", "commenting on them. I suggest some kind of a visual clue. 1. A", "2. Would it make sense to filter the questions that pop into sidebars", "side bar. As far, as I understand, \"late answers\" (and, by extension, comments)", "2012, because I did not notice it was so old. Incidentally, I stumbled", "it via the side bar. As far, as I understand, \"late answers\" (and,", "answer it?\" might help. 2. Would it make sense to filter the questions", "disabling commenting on them. I suggest some kind of a visual clue. 1.", "I would not suggest disabling commenting on them. I suggest some kind of", "extension, comments) are frowned on. I would not suggest disabling commenting on them.", "not notice it was so old. Incidentally, I stumbled upon it via the" ]
[ "What is the situation with those in high school who have a question", "avoided, but when you have situations such as sexual harassment or assault going", "lot of down-votes so I asked why. A comment was made that >", "ask list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) doesn't have anything about high school problems, and above all, 7.", "academia as defined in any dictionary (see [OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia), or [Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia) for examples) 3.", "for asking questions here within the help pages doesn't mention anything. 5. The", "high school problems. (2) The post contains sh\\t qualified for rude/abusive flagging. The", "doesn't have anything about high school problems, and above all, 7. The topic", "academics of all levels. > > > 4. The question on [what's on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)", "made that > > (1) We do not handle high school problems. (2)", "as defined in any dictionary (see [OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia), or [Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia) for examples) 3. [The", "level of academic study. What is the situation with those in high school", "teaching grades 7-12 considered \"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)). Now if certain levels of academic study is", "a quick pointer into the comments to inform a new member* about their", "anything. 5. The [introduction to the site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se) mentions nothing about it 6. The", "site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se) mentions nothing about it 6. The [don't ask list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) doesn't have anything", "shouldn't they be able to ask the academic community what they would do?", "[The tour page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour) doesn't mention this. It says > > Academia is a", "on-topic, shouldn't this be highlighted, especially on the tour page where it says", "in a vulnerable position. Edit I have just been pointed to a related", "would do? To me, having down-votes in this manner can be damaging to", "this manner can be damaging to someone in a vulnerable position. Edit I", "nothing about it 6. The [don't ask list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) doesn't have anything about high", "flags > > > I am shocked about this for a number of", "mention this. It says > > Academia is a question and answer site", "> > > 4. The question on [what's on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) for asking questions here", "downvoted by the flags > > > I am shocked about this for", "On top of that, you could just put a quick pointer into the", "question on [what's on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) for asking questions here within the help pages doesn't", "within the question affects not just high school but every level of academic", "studies? I can understand that homework questions should be avoided, but when you", "I am shocked about this for a number of reasons. 1. As another", "edited. On top of that, you could just put a quick pointer into", "on, why shouldn't they be able to ask the academic community what they", "[Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia) for examples) 3. [The tour page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour) doesn't mention this. It says >", "post contains sh\\t qualified for rude/abusive flagging. The question is automatically downvoted by", "can be damaging to someone in a vulnerable position. Edit* I have just", "above all, 7. The topic within the question affects not just high school", "be avoided, but when you have situations such as sexual harassment or assault", "Now if certain levels of academic study is not on-topic, shouldn't this be", "of academic study is not on-topic, shouldn't this be highlighted, especially on the", "asking [How to stop sexual harassment by teacher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104497/how-to-stop-sexual-harrassment-by-teacher) there was a lot of", "been pointed to a related question ([public school teaching grades 7-12 considered \"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)).", "study is not on-topic, shouldn't this be highlighted, especially on the tour page", "> (1) We do not handle high school problems. (2) The post contains", "or [Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia) for examples) 3. [The tour page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour) doesn't mention this. It says", "number of reasons. 1. As another person commented, bad language is easily edited.", "3. [The tour page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour) doesn't mention this. It says > > Academia is", "should be avoided, but when you have situations such as sexual harassment or", "new member about their language. 2. High school is within academia as defined", "[OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia), or [Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia) for examples) 3. [The tour page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour) doesn't mention this. It", "> > Academia is a question and answer site for academics of all", "their studies? I can understand that homework questions should be avoided, but when", "stop sexual harassment by teacher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104497/how-to-stop-sexual-harrassment-by-teacher) there was a lot of down-votes so I", "page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour) doesn't mention this. It says > > Academia is a question and", "to ask the academic community what they would do? To me, having down-votes", "academic community what they would do? To me, having down-votes in this manner", "not on-topic, shouldn't this be highlighted, especially on the tour page where it", "be highlighted, especially on the tour page where it says for academics of", "so I asked why. A comment was made that > > (1) We", "to stop sexual harassment by teacher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104497/how-to-stop-sexual-harrassment-by-teacher) there was a lot of down-votes so", "homework questions should be avoided, but when you have situations such as sexual", "going on, why shouldn't they be able to ask the academic community what", "to a related question ([public school teaching grades 7-12 considered \"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)). Now if", "they would do? To me, having down-votes in this manner can be damaging", "sexual harassment or assault going on, why shouldn't they be able to ask", "The post contains sh\\t qualified for rude/abusive flagging. The question is automatically downvoted", "academic study is not on-topic, shouldn't this be highlighted, especially on the tour", "just put a quick pointer into the comments to inform a new member", "that homework questions should be avoided, but when you have situations such as", "just high school but every level of academic study. What is the situation", "by the flags > > > I am shocked about this for a", "inform a new member* about their language. 2. High school is within academia", "to someone in a vulnerable position. Edit I have just been pointed to", "certain levels of academic study is not on-topic, shouldn't this be highlighted, especially", "> > I am shocked about this for a number of reasons. 1.", "is automatically downvoted by the flags > > > I am shocked about", "answer site for academics of all levels. > > > 4. The question", "what they would do? To me, having down-votes in this manner can be", "a question asking [How to stop sexual harassment by teacher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104497/how-to-stop-sexual-harrassment-by-teacher) there was a", "in any dictionary (see [OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia), or [Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia) for examples) 3. [The tour page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour)", "for academics of all levels. > > > 4. The question on [what's", "harassment by teacher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104497/how-to-stop-sexual-harrassment-by-teacher) there was a lot of down-votes so I asked why.", "but every level of academic study. What is the situation with those in", "> 4. The question on [what's on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) for asking questions here within the", "you could just put a quick pointer into the comments to inform a", "there was a lot of down-votes so I asked why. A comment was", "about it 6. The [don't ask list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) doesn't have anything about high school", "4. The question on [what's on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) for asking questions here within the help", "who have a question regarding their studies? I can understand that homework questions", "why. A comment was made that > > (1) We do not handle", "[don't ask list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) doesn't have anything about high school problems, and above all,", "into the comments to inform a new member about their language. 2. High", "affects not just high school but every level of academic study. What is", "within academia as defined in any dictionary (see [OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia), or [Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia) for examples)", "to inform a new member** about their language. 2. High school is within", "all levels. > > > 4. The question on [what's on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) for asking", "that > > (1) We do not handle high school problems. (2) The", "not handle high school problems. (2) The post contains sh\\t qualified for rude/abusive", "problems. (2) The post contains sh\\t qualified for rude/abusive flagging. The question is", "was made that > > (1) We do not handle high school problems.", "list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) doesn't have anything about high school problems, and above all, 7. *The", "(1) We do not handle high school problems. (2) The post contains sh\\t", "high school who have a question regarding their studies? I can understand that", "says > > Academia is a question and answer site for academics of", "of all levels. > > > 4. The question on [what's on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) for", "As another person commented, bad language is easily edited. On top of that,", "language. 2. High school is within academia as defined in any dictionary (see", "questions should be avoided, but when you have situations such as sexual harassment", "doesn't mention this. It says > > Academia is a question and answer", "> > (1) We do not handle high school problems. (2) The post", "> Academia is a question and answer site for academics of all levels.", "within the help pages doesn't mention anything. 5. The [introduction to the site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se)", "it 6. The [don't ask list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) doesn't have anything about high school problems,", "question affects not just high school but every level of academic study. What", "in high school who have a question regarding their studies? I can understand", "do? To me, having down-votes in this manner can be damaging to someone", "assault going on, why shouldn't they be able to ask the academic community", "The [don't ask list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) doesn't have anything about high school problems, and above", "The question on [what's on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) for asking questions here within the help pages", "qualified for rude/abusive flagging. The question is automatically downvoted by the flags >", "a new member about their language. 2. High school is within academia as", "community what they would do? To me, having down-votes in this manner can", "tour page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour) doesn't mention this. It says > > Academia is a question", "mention anything. 5. The [introduction to the site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se) mentions nothing about it 6.", "asked why. A comment was made that > > (1) We do not", "grades 7-12 considered \"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)). Now if certain levels of academic study is not", "asking questions here within the help pages doesn't mention anything. 5. The [introduction", "regarding their studies? I can understand that homework questions should be avoided, but", "when you have situations such as sexual harassment or assault going on, why", "the help pages doesn't mention anything. 5. The [introduction to the site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se) mentions", "5. The [introduction to the site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se) mentions nothing about it 6. The [don't", "not just high school but every level of academic study. What is the", "commented, bad language is easily edited. On top of that, you could just", "site for academics of all levels. > > > 4. The question on", "their language. 2. High school is within academia as defined in any dictionary", "topic within the question affects not just high school but every level of", "all, 7. The topic within the question affects not just high school but", "sexual harassment by teacher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104497/how-to-stop-sexual-harrassment-by-teacher) there was a lot of down-votes so I asked", "A comment was made that > > (1) We do not handle high", "To me, having down-votes in this manner can be damaging to someone in", "and answer site for academics of all levels. > > > 4. The", "a question regarding their studies? I can understand that homework questions should be", "someone in a vulnerable position. Edit I have just been pointed to a", "school is within academia as defined in any dictionary (see [OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia), or [Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia)", "anything about high school problems, and above all, 7. The topic within the", "for rude/abusive flagging. The question is automatically downvoted by the flags > >", "The [introduction to the site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se) mentions nothing about it 6. The [don't ask", "([public school teaching grades 7-12 considered \"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)). Now if certain levels of academic", "school problems. (2) The post contains sh\\t qualified for rude/abusive flagging. The question", "but when you have situations such as sexual harassment or assault going on,", "vulnerable position. Edit* I have just been pointed to a related question ([public", "the academic community what they would do? To me, having down-votes in this", "this for a number of reasons. 1. As another person commented, bad language", "High school is within academia as defined in any dictionary (see [OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia), or", "with those in high school who have a question regarding their studies? I", "dictionary (see [OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia), or [Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia) for examples) 3. [The tour page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour) doesn't mention", "defined in any dictionary (see [OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia), or [Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia) for examples) 3. [The tour", "high school but every level of academic study. What is the situation with", "have a question regarding their studies? I can understand that homework questions should", "of down-votes so I asked why. A comment was made that > >", "could just put a quick pointer into the comments to inform a new", "here within the help pages doesn't mention anything. 5. The [introduction to the", "a vulnerable position. Edit I have just been pointed to a related question", "is a question and answer site for academics of all levels. > >", "harassment or assault going on, why shouldn't they be able to ask the", "sh\\t qualified for rude/abusive flagging. The question is automatically downvoted by the flags", "2. High school is within academia as defined in any dictionary (see [OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia),", "Edit* I have just been pointed to a related question ([public school teaching", "put a quick pointer into the comments to inform a new member about", "handle high school problems. (2) The post contains sh\\t qualified for rude/abusive flagging.", "[what's on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) for asking questions here within the help pages doesn't mention anything.", "a lot of down-votes so I asked why. A comment was made that", "school problems, and above all, 7. The topic within the question affects not", "is not on-topic, shouldn't this be highlighted, especially on the tour page where", "another person commented, bad language is easily edited. On top of that, you", "pointer into the comments to inform a new member* about their language. 2.", "person commented, bad language is easily edited. On top of that, you could", "easily edited. On top of that, you could just put a quick pointer", "such as sexual harassment or assault going on, why shouldn't they be able", "ask the academic community what they would do? To me, having down-votes in", "if certain levels of academic study is not on-topic, shouldn't this be highlighted,", "levels of academic study is not on-topic, shouldn't this be highlighted, especially on", "The question is automatically downvoted by the flags > > > I am", "about this for a number of reasons. 1. As another person commented, bad", "have situations such as sexual harassment or assault going on, why shouldn't they", "able to ask the academic community what they would do? To me, having", "I have just been pointed to a related question ([public school teaching grades", "this be highlighted, especially on the tour page where it says for academics", "of that, you could just put a quick pointer into the comments to", "the site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se) mentions nothing about it 6. The [don't ask list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) doesn't have", "damaging to someone in a vulnerable position. Edit I have just been pointed", "is easily edited. On top of that, you could just put a quick", "The topic within the question affects not just high school but every level", "for a number of reasons. 1. As another person commented, bad language is", "> > 4. The question on [what's on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) for asking questions here within", "help pages doesn't mention anything. 5. The [introduction to the site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se) mentions nothing", "problems, and above all, 7. *The topic within the question affects not just", "doesn't mention anything. 5. The [introduction to the site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se) mentions nothing about it", "be able to ask the academic community what they would do? To me,", "was a lot of down-votes so I asked why. A comment was made", "contains sh\\t qualified for rude/abusive flagging. The question is automatically downvoted by the", "We do not handle high school problems. (2) The post contains sh\\t qualified", "that, you could just put a quick pointer into the comments to inform", "school teaching grades 7-12 considered \"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)). Now if certain levels of academic study", "top of that, you could just put a quick pointer into the comments", "the situation with those in high school who have a question regarding their", "am shocked about this for a number of reasons. 1. As another person", "the comments to inform a new member* about their language. 2. High school", "7. The topic within the question affects not just high school but every", "question ([public school teaching grades 7-12 considered \"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)). Now if certain levels of", "academic study. What is the situation with those in high school who have", "this. It says > > Academia is a question and answer site for", "or assault going on, why shouldn't they be able to ask the academic", "comment was made that > > (1) We do not handle high school", "rude/abusive flagging. The question is automatically downvoted by the flags > > >", "bad language is easily edited. On top of that, you could just put", "about their language. 2. High school is within academia as defined in any", "have just been pointed to a related question ([public school teaching grades 7-12", "quick pointer into the comments to inform a new member about their language.", "levels. > > > 4. The question on [what's on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) for asking questions", "7-12 considered \"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)). Now if certain levels of academic study is not on-topic,", "to the site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se) mentions nothing about it 6. The [don't ask list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) doesn't", "\"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)). Now if certain levels of academic study is not on-topic, shouldn't this", "the question affects not just high school but every level of academic study.", "in this manner can be damaging to someone in a vulnerable position. Edit", "question and answer site for academics of all levels. > > > 4.", "position. Edit I have just been pointed to a related question ([public school", "I asked why. A comment was made that > > (1) We do", "high school problems, and above all, 7. The topic within the question affects", "considered \"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)). Now if certain levels of academic study is not on-topic, shouldn't", "examples) 3. [The tour page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour) doesn't mention this. It says > > Academia", "especially on the tour page where it says for academics of all levels", "down-votes so I asked why. A comment was made that > > (1)", "It says > > Academia is a question and answer site for academics", "have anything about high school problems, and above all, 7. The topic within", "> > > I am shocked about this for a number of reasons.", "reasons. 1. As another person commented, bad language is easily edited. On top", "comments to inform a new member about their language. 2. High school is", "is the situation with those in high school who have a question regarding", "me, having down-votes in this manner can be damaging to someone in a", "those in high school who have a question regarding their studies? I can", "any dictionary (see [OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia), or [Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia) for examples) 3. [The tour page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour) doesn't", "be damaging to someone in a vulnerable position. Edit I have just been", "6. The [don't ask list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) doesn't have anything about high school problems, and", "they be able to ask the academic community what they would do? To", "just been pointed to a related question ([public school teaching grades 7-12 considered", "the flags > > > I am shocked about this for a number", "of academic study*. What is the situation with those in high school who", "can understand that homework questions should be avoided, but when you have situations", "is within academia as defined in any dictionary (see [OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia), or [Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia) for", "teacher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104497/how-to-stop-sexual-harrassment-by-teacher) there was a lot of down-votes so I asked why. A comment", "down-votes in this manner can be damaging to someone in a vulnerable position.", "1. As another person commented, bad language is easily edited. On top of", "a related question ([public school teaching grades 7-12 considered \"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)). Now if certain", "(2) The post contains sh\\t qualified for rude/abusive flagging. The question is automatically", "by teacher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104497/how-to-stop-sexual-harrassment-by-teacher) there was a lot of down-votes so I asked why. A", "school who have a question regarding their studies? I can understand that homework", "as sexual harassment or assault going on, why shouldn't they be able to", "understand that homework questions should be avoided, but when you have situations such", "language is easily edited. On top of that, you could just put a", "shocked about this for a number of reasons. 1. As another person commented,", "a question and answer site for academics of all levels. > > >", "[introduction to the site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se) mentions nothing about it 6. The [don't ask list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask)", "In a question asking [How to stop sexual harassment by teacher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104497/how-to-stop-sexual-harrassment-by-teacher) there was", "> I am shocked about this for a number of reasons. 1. As", "related question ([public school teaching grades 7-12 considered \"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)). Now if certain levels", "automatically downvoted by the flags > > > I am shocked about this", "shouldn't this be highlighted, especially on the tour page where it says for", "having down-votes in this manner can be damaging to someone in a vulnerable", "member about their language. 2. High school is within academia as defined in", "questions here within the help pages doesn't mention anything. 5. The [introduction to", "manner can be damaging to someone in a vulnerable position. Edit I have", "question asking [How to stop sexual harassment by teacher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104497/how-to-stop-sexual-harrassment-by-teacher) there was a lot", "and above all, 7. The topic within the question affects not just high", "about high school problems, and above all, 7. The topic within the question", "every level of academic study. What is the situation with those in high", "question is automatically downvoted by the flags > > > I am shocked", "a number of reasons. 1. As another person commented, bad language is easily", "study. What is the situation with those in high school who have a", "mentions nothing about it 6. The [don't ask list](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) doesn't have anything about", "pages doesn't mention anything. 5. The [introduction to the site](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1203/welcome-to-academia-se) mentions nothing about", "why shouldn't they be able to ask the academic community what they would", "on [what's on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) for asking questions here within the help pages doesn't mention", "highlighted, especially on the tour page where it says for academics of all", "on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) for asking questions here within the help pages doesn't mention anything. 5.", "you have situations such as sexual harassment or assault going on, why shouldn't", "situation with those in high school who have a question regarding their studies?", "school but every level of academic study. What is the situation with those", "for examples) 3. [The tour page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour) doesn't mention this. It says > >", "of reasons. 1. As another person commented, bad language is easily edited. On", "situations such as sexual harassment or assault going on, why shouldn't they be", "pointed to a related question ([public school teaching grades 7-12 considered \"academic\"?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/610/public-school-teaching-grades-7-12-considered-academic)). Now", "question regarding their studies? I can understand that homework questions should be avoided,", "flagging. The question is automatically downvoted by the flags > > > I", "I can understand that homework questions should be avoided, but when you have", "[How to stop sexual harassment by teacher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104497/how-to-stop-sexual-harrassment-by-teacher) there was a lot of down-votes", "Academia is a question and answer site for academics of all levels. >", "(see [OED](https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/academia), or [Merriam-Webster](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/academia) for examples) 3. [The tour page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour) doesn't mention this.", "do not handle high school problems. (2) The post contains sh\\*t qualified for" ]
[ "the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will", "[last time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection), we're hosting the question collection a week in advance, so that", "that not only can folks start prepping questions in advance, but also potential", "If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to", "[next week, March 5th](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2). In connection with that, we will be holding a", "a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps", "is my last sweet day to use EST), this question will be open", "on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold", "questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find", "top voted questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to use", "or take time to arrive for closure, I think this is my last", "that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be", "into at currently. * At the start of the nomination phase, the Community", "for an election [next week, March 5th](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2). In connection with that, we will", "will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is", "any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a", "the community provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned", "syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for the", "3:00 pm EST on the same day, give or take time to arrive", "session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what", "we're hosting the question collection a week in advance, so that not only", "is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire). > > > Unlike", "UTC, or 3:00 pm EST on the same day, give or take time", "the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. * Once questions have been selected, a new", "> Unlike [last time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection), we're hosting the question collection a week in advance,", "themselves and seeing the questions they'll have an opening to answer. Here's how", "this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. ", "you are running into at currently. At the start of the nomination", "an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates", "or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have", "is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community", "election [next week, March 5th](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2). In connection with that, we will be holding", "may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire). > > > Unlike [last time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection), we're hosting the", "voted questions submitted by the community provided in this thread, to use in", "a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it", "day to use EST), this question will be open to collect potential questions", "> > Unlike [last time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection), we're hosting the question collection a week in", "have an opening to answer. Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination", "running into at currently. * At the start of the nomination phase, the", "phase, (so, until Monday, March 5th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm EST", "the question collection a week in advance, so that not only can folks", "time to arrive for closure, I think this is my last sweet day", "post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your question contains a link, please", "potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this question", "live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire). > > > Unlike [last time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection),", "about nominating themselves and seeing the questions they'll have an opening to answer.", "that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are", "a week in advance, so that not only can folks start prepping questions", "ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done", "we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an", "question collection a week in advance, so that not only can folks start", "> > The purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the", "community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a single post,", "the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like", "the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for", "you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per", "at currently. At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team", "think this is my last sweet day to use EST), this question will", "Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first", "questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction.", "guaranteed questions. * Once questions have been selected, a new question will be", "of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the", "answer. We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of", "this question will be open to collect potential questions from the users of", "questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question", "8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community* provided in this", "be open to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post", "to this question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates.", "think about nominating themselves and seeing the questions they'll have an opening to", "is scheduled for an election [next week, March 5th](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2). In connection with that,", "so that not only can folks start prepping questions in advance, but also", "the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a single", "submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to use in addition to", "This will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions", "sweet day to use EST), this question will be open to collect potential", "with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is", "advance, so that not only can folks start prepping questions in advance, but", "typically containing 10 questions in total. * This is not the only option", "for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it", "as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. ", "question per answer. * We, the Community Team, will be providing a small", "provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this", "Once questions have been selected, a new question will be opened to host", "the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions", "thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. * Once", "Until the nomination phase, (so, until Monday, March 5th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or", "included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This", "questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to use in addition", "will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to", "This will be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction. ", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire).* > > > Unlike [last time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection), we're hosting the question collection a", "of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would", "in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions.", "answer. Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until Monday,", "Participation is completely voluntary. > > *The purpose of this thread was to", "hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or", "thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live,", "question will be open to collect potential questions from the users of the", "last sweet day to use EST), this question will be open to collect", "to be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough", "the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. This is not the", "candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. * This is not the only", "community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation", "only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community,", "to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. >", "EST), this question will be open to collect potential questions from the users", "the nomination phase, (so, until Monday, March 5th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00", "addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. * Once questions have been selected,", "on the same day, give or take time to arrive for closure, I", "Community Team will select *up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted", "example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions,", "arrive for closure, I think this is my last sweet day to use", "Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free", "the same day, give or take time to arrive for closure, I think", "ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. We, the", "purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire", "be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two will be", "per answer. We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection", "`[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire.", "in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. * Once questions have been", "10 questions in total. * This is not the only option that users", "for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. * This is not", "questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire).** > > >", "clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions", "(so, until Monday, March 5th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm EST on", "* Until the nomination phase, (so, until Monday, March 5th at 20:00:00Z UTC,", "for closure, I think this is my last sweet day to use EST),", "option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you", "gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for", "questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific", "nomination phase, (so, until Monday, March 5th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm", "like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. ", "guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply", "total. This is not the only option that users have for gathering", "same day, give or take time to arrive for closure, I think this", "with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community", "collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this", "that are specific to your community and issues that you are running into", "will select up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the", "collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may", "opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on", "live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications", "potential candidates can think about nominating themselves and seeing the questions they'll have", "of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. > > The purpose of this thread", "if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a", "candidates. Please only post one question per answer. * We, the Community Team,", "EST on the same day, give or take time to arrive for closure,", "my last sweet day to use EST), this question will be open to", "opening to answer. Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so,", "to arrive for closure, I think this is my last sweet day to", "been selected, a new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire", "in total. * This is not the only option that users have for", "community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session", "prior instruction. * If your question contains a link, please use the syntax", "you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire).** > > > Unlike [last time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection), we're hosting", "collection a week in advance, so that not only can folks start prepping", "scheduled for an election [next week, March 5th](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2). In connection with that, we", "Academia is scheduled for an election [next week, March 5th](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2). In connection with", "the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a", "not only can folks start prepping questions in advance, but also potential candidates", "to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask", "one question per answer. * We, the Community Team, will be providing a", "your question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that", "the nomination phase, the Community Team will select *up to 8 of the", "to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to", "not the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As", "make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. This is a", "I think this is my last sweet day to use EST), this question", "moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. > > *The purpose of this thread was", "how it'll work: Until the nomination phase, (so, until Monday, March 5th", "it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect", "can folks start prepping questions in advance, but also potential candidates can think", "pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely", "will be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If", "the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select *up to", "opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that", "to answer. Here's how it'll work: Until the nomination phase, (so, until", "until Monday, March 5th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm EST on the", "what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback", "now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire).** > > > Unlike [last", "would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer.", "questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing", "a single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your question contains a", "the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. ", "connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This", "questions in advance, but also potential candidates can think about nominating themselves and", "to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in", "two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the", "to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that you", "are specific to your community and issues that you are running into at", "of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of", "can think about nominating themselves and seeing the questions they'll have an opening", " This is not the only option that users have for gathering information", "week, March 5th](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2). In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A", "holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members", "easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity", "the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. > >", "providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed", "questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones", "in a single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your question contains", "advance, but also potential candidates can think about nominating themselves and seeing the", "perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues", "they'll have an opening to answer. Here's how it'll work: * Until the", "unlike the prior instruction. * If your question contains a link, please use", "this question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please", "questions that are specific to your community and issues that you are running", "the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. * We, the Community", "be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions.", "If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as", "community** provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2", "This is not the only option that users have for gathering information on", "day, give or take time to arrive for closure, I think this is", "answers to this question containing any questions you would like to ask the", "questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a comment", "latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be", "or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a comment here.", "* Once questions have been selected, a new question will be opened to", "community and issues that you are running into at currently. * At the", "is not the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates.", "instruction. * If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of", "it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until Monday, March 5th at", "also potential candidates can think about nominating themselves and seeing the questions they'll", "any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one", "for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to,", "and issues that you are running into at currently. At the start", "doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike", "Please only post one question per answer. * We, the Community Team, will", "still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates", "your community and issues that you are running into at currently. * At", "candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose", "are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your", "only can folks start prepping questions in advance, but also potential candidates can", "be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the", "will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the community", "finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are", "* We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic", "from the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any", "the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The", "find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire). > > > Unlike [last time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection), we're hosting the question", "specific to your community and issues that you are running into at currently.", "the top voted questions submitted by the community provided in this thread, to", "to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. * Once questions", "folks start prepping questions in advance, but also potential candidates can think about", "> > > Unlike [last time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection), we're hosting the question collection a week", "seeing the questions they'll have an opening to answer. Here's how it'll work:", "to your community and issues that you are running into at currently. ", "topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. > > The purpose of this", "be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction. If your", "please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for", "In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates.", "post one question per answer. * We, the Community Team, will be providing", "give or take time to arrive for closure, I think this is my", "questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you", "the questions they'll have an opening to answer. Here's how it'll work: ", "your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided", "issues that you are running into at currently. At the start of", "to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is", "questions. * Once questions have been selected, a new question will be opened", "take time to arrive for closure, I think this is my last sweet", "for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to", "the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that", "Unlike [last time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection), we're hosting the question collection a week in advance, so", "5th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm EST on the same day, give", "to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community** provided in", "an opening to answer. Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase,", "up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community provided", "from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or", "questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. * This is", "Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until Monday, March", "perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any", "on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. > > The purpose", "start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8", "currently. * At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will", "ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A.", "pm EST on the same day, give or take time to arrive for", "transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice", "the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel", "selected, a new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for", "Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two", "work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until Monday, March 5th at 20:00:00Z", "to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the", "* This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to", "and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire). > > > Unlike [last time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection), we're", "first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if", "nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of the top", "in advance, but also potential candidates can think about nominating themselves and seeing", "phase, the Community Team will select *up to 8 of the top voted", "members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic", "As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live", " At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select", "questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire).** >", "of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished", "are running into at currently. * At the start of the nomination phase,", "done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your question", "> *The purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire.", "closure, I think this is my last sweet day to use EST), this", "that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. This", "the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community to", "a small selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to", "open to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers", "for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the", "aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. * Once questions have been selected, a new question", "of the top voted questions submitted by the community provided in this thread,", "will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity", "will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two will", "link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier", "is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about", "20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm EST on the same day, give or take", "use EST), this question will be open to collect potential questions from the", "of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of", "for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further", "is completely voluntary. > > The purpose of this thread was to collect", "information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example,", "actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. * This", "The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire).** > >", "single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your question contains a link,", "and seeing the questions they'll have an opening to answer. Here's how it'll", "5th](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2). In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the", "an election [next week, March 5th](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2). In connection with that, we will be", "Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the", "or 3:00 pm EST on the same day, give or take time to", "generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter", "users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still", "questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary.", "use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing", "host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total.", "2 guaranteed questions. * Once questions have been selected, a new question will", "for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions", "candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a", "candidates can think about nominating themselves and seeing the questions they'll have an", "in advance, so that not only can folks start prepping questions in advance,", "the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. > > The purpose of", "have been selected, a new question will be opened to host the actual", "The purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The", "have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free", "with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will", "March 5th](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2). In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with", "hosting the question collection a week in advance, so that not only can", "this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now", "are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in", "contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make", "time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection), we're hosting the question collection a week in advance, so that not", "at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm EST on the same day, give or", "that you are running into at currently. * At the start of the", "to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you", "select up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community", "candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. > > *The", "the prior instruction. If your question contains a link, please use the", "a new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the", "The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are", "the Community Team will select *up to 8 of the top voted questions", "was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and", "to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. Once questions have been selected, a", "voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that you are", "you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post", "the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire).", "At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up", "selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included,", "this is my last sweet day to use EST), this question will be", "provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed", "it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4025/2018-moderator-election-qa-questionnaire). > > > Unlike [last time](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/932/2014-moderator-election-qa-question-collection), we're hosting the question collection", "enough questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike the prior", "start prepping questions in advance, but also potential candidates can think about nominating", "a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and", "chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from", "March 5th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm EST on the same day,", "of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is", "by the community provided in this thread, to use in addition to the", "users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you", "site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like to", "new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates,", "you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with", "nominating themselves and seeing the questions they'll have an opening to answer. Here's", "* If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`,", "question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only", "only post one question per answer. * We, the Community Team, will be", "completely voluntary. > > The purpose of this thread was to collect questions", "small selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be", "voluntary. > > The purpose of this thread was to collect questions for", "free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to", "containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post", "questions they'll have an opening to answer. Here's how it'll work: * Until", "to use EST), this question will be open to collect potential questions from", "will be open to collect potential questions from the users of the site.", "a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat", "question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will", "be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for", "Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like to ask", "supply enough questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike the", "questions have been selected, a new question will be opened to host the", "We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions.", "question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically", "candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in", "Monday, March 5th at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 3:00 pm EST on the same", "use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. * Once questions have", "to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. * We,", "further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If", "opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions", "week in advance, so that not only can folks start prepping questions in", "containing 10 questions in total. * This is not the only option that", "a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of", "be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't", "Team will select *up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by", "the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation.", "prepping questions in advance, but also potential candidates can think about nominating themselves", "but also potential candidates can think about nominating themselves and seeing the questions", "will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing", "be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10", "questions in total. This is not the only option that users have", "This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your", "have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as", "in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this process," ]
[ "is worth adding a new answer to this question that reflects that updated", "on the now-debunked [\"A Rape on Campus\"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus) Rolling Stone article. As user Ben", "Rolling Stone article. As user Ben [points out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441), this information isn't in the", "has been thoroughly discredited and exposed as serious journalistic misconduct, I think it", "isn't in the post. > > Now that the reported rape at the", "be changed to either reflect that the example didn't happen, or edited maybe", "As user Ben [points out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441), this information isn't in the post. > >", "the example didn't happen, or edited maybe to be about any other sexual", "serious journalistic misconduct, I think it is worth adding a new answer to", "on Campus\"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus) Rolling Stone article. As user Ben [points out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441), this information isn't", "Stone* article. As user Ben [points out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441), this information isn't in the post.", "* [Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/) Personally, I think changing the predicating assault is fine - or", "article. As user Ben [points out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441), this information isn't in the post. >", "Ben [points out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441), this information isn't in the post. > > Now that", "predicating assault is fine - or the OP Zen Cwewild can weigh in.", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32317/what-leverage-do-universities-have-over-sexual-violence-in-fraternities) is predicated on the now-debunked [\"A Rape on Campus\"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus) Rolling Stone article.", "[Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html) * [Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2) * [Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/) Personally, I think changing the predicating assault is", "I think it is worth adding a new answer to this question that", "out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441), this information isn't in the post. > > Now that the reported", "reported rape at the University of Virginia has been thoroughly discredited and exposed", "[Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/) Personally, I think changing the predicating assault is fine - or the", "the University of Virginia has been thoroughly discredited and exposed as serious journalistic", "abrasive, it does merit consideration that the question should be changed to either", "in the post. > > Now that the reported rape at the University", "a new answer to this question that reflects that updated information. > >", "answer to this question that reflects that updated information. > > > While", "exposed as serious journalistic misconduct, I think it is worth adding a new", "that the question should be changed to either reflect that the example didn't", "that occurred in a frat: From aeismail's suggestions: * [Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html) * [Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2) ", "that the reported rape at the University of Virginia has been thoroughly discredited", "about any other sexual assault that occurred in a frat: From aeismail's suggestions:", "or edited maybe to be about any other sexual assault that occurred in", "the post. > > Now that the reported rape at the University of", "the question should be changed to either reflect that the example didn't happen,", "predicated on the now-debunked [\"A Rape on Campus\"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus) Rolling Stone* article. As user", "Virginia has been thoroughly discredited and exposed as serious journalistic misconduct, I think", "is certainly abrasive, it does merit consideration that the question should be changed", "now-debunked [\"A Rape on Campus\"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus) Rolling Stone article. As user Ben [points out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441),", "maybe to be about any other sexual assault that occurred in a frat:", "the now-debunked [\"A Rape on Campus\"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus) Rolling Stone article. As user Ben [points", "as serious journalistic misconduct, I think it is worth adding a new answer", "this question that reflects that updated information. > > > While his \"answer\"", "> While his \"answer\" is certainly abrasive, it does merit consideration that the", "other sexual assault that occurred in a frat: From aeismail's suggestions: * [Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html)", "been thoroughly discredited and exposed as serious journalistic misconduct, I think it is", "does merit consideration that the question should be changed to either reflect that", "a frat: From aeismail's suggestions: * [Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html) * [Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2) * [Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/) Personally, I", "journalistic misconduct, I think it is worth adding a new answer to this", "discredited and exposed as serious journalistic misconduct, I think it is worth adding", "certainly abrasive, it does merit consideration that the question should be changed to", "Now that the reported rape at the University of Virginia has been thoroughly", "reflect that the example didn't happen, or edited maybe to be about any", "be about any other sexual assault that occurred in a frat: From aeismail's", "his \"answer\" is certainly abrasive, it does merit consideration that the question should", "* [Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html) * [Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2) * [Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/) Personally, I think changing the predicating assault", "> > Now that the reported rape at the University of Virginia has", "happen, or edited maybe to be about any other sexual assault that occurred", "to either reflect that the example didn't happen, or edited maybe to be", "to this question that reflects that updated information. > > > While his", "occurred in a frat: From aeismail's suggestions: * [Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html) * [Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2) * [Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/)", "updated information. > > > While his \"answer\" is certainly abrasive, it does", "consideration that the question should be changed to either reflect that the example", "of Virginia has been thoroughly discredited and exposed as serious journalistic misconduct, I", "information isn't in the post. > > Now that the reported rape at", "it is worth adding a new answer to this question that reflects that", "think it is worth adding a new answer to this question that reflects", "[This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/32317/what-leverage-do-universities-have-over-sexual-violence-in-fraternities) is predicated on the now-debunked [\"A Rape on Campus\"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus) Rolling Stone", "misconduct, I think it is worth adding a new answer to this question", "the reported rape at the University of Virginia has been thoroughly discredited and", "reflects that updated information. > > > While his \"answer\" is certainly abrasive,", "the predicating assault is fine - or the OP Zen Cwewild can weigh", "rape at the University of Virginia has been thoroughly discredited and exposed as", "new answer to this question that reflects that updated information. > > >", "question that reflects that updated information. > > > While his \"answer\" is", "example didn't happen, or edited maybe to be about any other sexual assault", "is predicated on the now-debunked [\"A Rape on Campus\"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus) Rolling Stone article. As", "\"answer\" is certainly abrasive, it does merit consideration that the question should be", "> Now that the reported rape at the University of Virginia has been", "frat: From aeismail's suggestions: * [Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html) * [Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2) * [Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/) Personally, I think", "in a frat: From aeismail's suggestions: * [Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html) * [Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2) * [Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/) Personally,", "[Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2) * [Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/) Personally, I think changing the predicating assault is fine -", "adding a new answer to this question that reflects that updated information. >", "merit consideration that the question should be changed to either reflect that the", "that reflects that updated information. > > > While his \"answer\" is certainly", "user Ben [points out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441), this information isn't in the post. > > Now", "at the University of Virginia has been thoroughly discredited and exposed as serious", "information. > > > While his \"answer\" is certainly abrasive, it does merit", "> > While his \"answer\" is certainly abrasive, it does merit consideration that", "changing the predicating assault is fine - or the OP Zen Cwewild can", "this information isn't in the post. > > Now that the reported rape", "didn't happen, or edited maybe to be about any other sexual assault that", "From aeismail's suggestions: * [Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html) * [Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2) * [Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/) Personally, I think changing", "Campus\"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus) Rolling Stone article. As user Ben [points out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441), this information isn't in", "[\"A Rape on Campus\"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus) Rolling Stone article. As user Ben [points out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441), this", "University of Virginia has been thoroughly discredited and exposed as serious journalistic misconduct,", "question should be changed to either reflect that the example didn't happen, or", "* [Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2) * [Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/) Personally, I think changing the predicating assault is fine", "should be changed to either reflect that the example didn't happen, or edited", "to be about any other sexual assault that occurred in a frat: From", "aeismail's suggestions: * [Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html) * [Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2) * [Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/) Personally, I think changing the", "edited maybe to be about any other sexual assault that occurred in a", "worth adding a new answer to this question that reflects that updated information.", "I think changing the predicating assault is fine - or the OP Zen", "> > > While his \"answer\" is certainly abrasive, it does merit consideration", "assault that occurred in a frat: From aeismail's suggestions: * [Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html) * [Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2)", "post. > > Now that the reported rape at the University of Virginia", "and exposed as serious journalistic misconduct, I think it is worth adding a", "that the example didn't happen, or edited maybe to be about any other", "thoroughly discredited and exposed as serious journalistic misconduct, I think it is worth", "While his \"answer\" is certainly abrasive, it does merit consideration that the question", "it does merit consideration that the question should be changed to either reflect", "changed to either reflect that the example didn't happen, or edited maybe to", "Rape on Campus\"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Rape_on_Campus) Rolling Stone article. As user Ben [points out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441), this information", "Personally, I think changing the predicating assault is fine - or the OP", "[points out](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104545/37441), this information isn't in the post. > > Now that the", "think changing the predicating assault is fine - or the OP Zen Cwewild", "any other sexual assault that occurred in a frat: From aeismail's suggestions: ", "either reflect that the example didn't happen, or edited maybe to be about", "suggestions: [Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html) * [Yale](http://www.businessinsider.com/yale-dke-frat-brothers-allegations-of-sexual-assault-2018-2) * [Wisconsin](https://badgerherald.com/news/2018/02/04/saturday-night-sexual-assault-reported-at-unknown-fraternity/) Personally, I think changing the predicating", "sexual assault that occurred in a frat: From aeismail's suggestions: * [Baylor](http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco--16-defendants-added-to-lawsuit-over-2016-BU-frat-party-rape-474908383.html) *", "that updated information. > > > While his \"answer\" is certainly abrasive, it" ]
[ "others in similar but not identical situations? In any case I will add", "- information which was not originally apparent. Since then, OP has clarified that", "and this invalidates my answer. Should I now remove my (substantially upvoted) answer", "(substantially upvoted) answer which does not address OP's exact situation? Or should I", "situation? Or should I leave it to stand on the basis that it", "which was not originally apparent. Since then, OP has clarified that my assumption", "on the basis that it may be helpful to others in similar but", "PhD student’s incompetence to their supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184) I gave [an answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184) based on an", "[an answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184) based on an assumption that the OP and a supervisor were", "helpful to others in similar but not identical situations? In any case I", "apparent. Since then, OP has clarified that my assumption was incorrect, and this", "I report a PhD student’s incompetence to their supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184) I gave [an answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184)", "it to stand on the basis that it may be helpful to others", "[Should I report a PhD student’s incompetence to their supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184) I gave [an", "and a supervisor were based at the same institution - information which was", "address OP's exact situation? Or should I leave it to stand on the", "my assumption was incorrect, and this invalidates my answer. Should I now remove", "that it may be helpful to others in similar but not identical situations?", "student’s incompetence to their supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184) I gave [an answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184) based on an assumption", "remove my (substantially upvoted) answer which does not address OP's exact situation? Or", "based on an assumption that the OP and a supervisor were based at", "upvoted) answer which does not address OP's exact situation? Or should I leave", "exact situation? Or should I leave it to stand on the basis that", "supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184) I gave [an answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184) based on an assumption that the OP and", "For the question [Should I report a PhD student’s incompetence to their supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184)", "same institution - information which was not originally apparent. Since then, OP has", "not address OP's exact situation? Or should I leave it to stand on", "identical situations? In any case I will add a note to indicate my", "may be helpful to others in similar but not identical situations? In any", "the basis that it may be helpful to others in similar but not", "OP's exact situation? Or should I leave it to stand on the basis", "now remove my (substantially upvoted) answer which does not address OP's exact situation?", "to stand on the basis that it may be helpful to others in", "that the OP and a supervisor were based at the same institution -", "the question [Should I report a PhD student’s incompetence to their supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184) I", "assumption was incorrect, and this invalidates my answer. Should I now remove my", "the same institution - information which was not originally apparent. Since then, OP", "it may be helpful to others in similar but not identical situations? In", "at the same institution - information which was not originally apparent. Since then,", "in similar but not identical situations? In any case I will add a", "a PhD student’s incompetence to their supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184) I gave [an answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184) based on", "invalidates my answer. Should I now remove my (substantially upvoted) answer which does", "answer. Should I now remove my (substantially upvoted) answer which does not address", "the OP and a supervisor were based at the same institution - information", "report a PhD student’s incompetence to their supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184) I gave [an answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184) based", "institution - information which was not originally apparent. Since then, OP has clarified", "to others in similar but not identical situations? In any case I will", "stand on the basis that it may be helpful to others in similar", "which does not address OP's exact situation? Or should I leave it to", "In any case I will add a note to indicate my incorrect assumption.", "then, OP has clarified that my assumption was incorrect, and this invalidates my", "that my assumption was incorrect, and this invalidates my answer. Should I now", "their supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184) I gave [an answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184) based on an assumption that the OP", "Since then, OP has clarified that my assumption was incorrect, and this invalidates", "originally apparent. Since then, OP has clarified that my assumption was incorrect, and", "was not originally apparent. Since then, OP has clarified that my assumption was", "a supervisor were based at the same institution - information which was not", "my (substantially upvoted) answer which does not address OP's exact situation? Or should", "leave it to stand on the basis that it may be helpful to", "situations? In any case I will add a note to indicate my incorrect", "does not address OP's exact situation? Or should I leave it to stand", "Should I now remove my (substantially upvoted) answer which does not address OP's", "not originally apparent. Since then, OP has clarified that my assumption was incorrect,", "I gave [an answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184) based on an assumption that the OP and a", "incompetence to their supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184) I gave [an answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184) based on an assumption that", "not identical situations? In any case I will add a note to indicate", "assumption that the OP and a supervisor were based at the same institution", "gave [an answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184) based on an assumption that the OP and a supervisor", "supervisor were based at the same institution - information which was not originally", "should I leave it to stand on the basis that it may be", "clarified that my assumption was incorrect, and this invalidates my answer. Should I", "Or should I leave it to stand on the basis that it may", "I now remove my (substantially upvoted) answer which does not address OP's exact", "this invalidates my answer. Should I now remove my (substantially upvoted) answer which", "basis that it may be helpful to others in similar but not identical", "was incorrect, and this invalidates my answer. Should I now remove my (substantially", "question [Should I report a PhD student’s incompetence to their supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184) I gave", "OP and a supervisor were based at the same institution - information which", "I leave it to stand on the basis that it may be helpful", "OP has clarified that my assumption was incorrect, and this invalidates my answer.", "be helpful to others in similar but not identical situations? In any case", "but not identical situations? In any case I will add a note to", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184) based on an assumption that the OP and a supervisor were based", "based at the same institution - information which was not originally apparent. Since", "to their supervisor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/104704/46184) I gave [an answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/104720/46184) based on an assumption that the", "has clarified that my assumption was incorrect, and this invalidates my answer. Should", "on an assumption that the OP and a supervisor were based at the", "information which was not originally apparent. Since then, OP has clarified that my", "an assumption that the OP and a supervisor were based at the same", "incorrect, and this invalidates my answer. Should I now remove my (substantially upvoted)", "my answer. Should I now remove my (substantially upvoted) answer which does not", "answer which does not address OP's exact situation? Or should I leave it", "were based at the same institution - information which was not originally apparent.", "similar but not identical situations? In any case I will add a note" ]
[ "tools available to you at your current reputation level? > 2. How would", "study in academics? > 8. In your opinion, what do moderators do? >", "compiled into this one, which shall now serve as the space for the", "and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you", "Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection) have been", "the space for the candidates to provide their answers. Due to the submission", "this one, which shall now serve as the space for the candidates to", "the list of links in the order of submission. To save scrolling here", "the submitted questions. As a candidate, your job is simple - post an", "insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the first set of", "an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection) have been compiled into this one, which shall now serve", "of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from", "including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under", "Due to the submission count, we have selected all provided questions as well", "and also including a link to your answer on your nomination post. Once", "this will serve as a transcript for voters to view the thoughts of", "thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection) have been compiled", "question that you feel shouldn't have been? > 4. As a moderator, I", "for voters to view the thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately", "of submission. To save scrolling here are links to the submissions from each", "answers. Due to the submission count, we have selected all provided questions as", "after this blurb here, before that set of three dashes. Please leave the", "3. How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question", "thing to deal with. Under what circumstances will you delete comments? > 5.", "what do moderators do? > 9. A diamond will be attached to everything", "> 3. How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a", "In your opinion, what do moderators do? > 9. A diamond will be", "view the thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the", "the thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the Election", "to Meta and the question as well as answers supporting and opposing your", "under a different light. How do you feel about that? > > >", "the post. The user takes the issue to Meta and the question as", "you feel shouldn't have been? > 4. As a moderator, I find that", "have been compiled into this one, which shall now serve as the space", "questions. As a candidate, your job is simple - post an answer to", "questions for a total of 9 questions. We skipped one backup question because", "links in the order of submission.** To save scrolling here are links to", "mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been? > 4. As", "each candidate (in order of submission): * [padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118) * [Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118) * [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058)", "to view the thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in", "that you would be a good moderator? How have you used the moderation", "reputation level? > 2. How would you deal with a user who produced", "is your field of study in academics? > 8. In your opinion, what", "moderator elections, we are creating a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected", "to provide their answers. Due to the submission count, we have selected all", "top of your post so that readers will know who you are before", "save scrolling here are links to the submissions from each candidate (in order", "Good luck to all of the candidates! *Oh, and when you've completed your", "question because it covers similar ground as the submitted questions. As a candidate,", "4. As a moderator, I find that comments are a tricky thing to", "and will be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck to all", "their answers. Due to the submission count, we have selected all provided questions", "on moderation? Why do you feel this is the best example? > 7.", "thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please consider putting your name at", "be a good moderator? How have you used the moderation tools available to", "to each question given just below. For your convenience, I will include all", "the answers have been compiled, this will serve as a transcript for voters", "comments are a tricky thing to deal with. Under what circumstances will you", "answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please", "> 7. What is your field of study in academics? > 8. In", "your name at the top of your post so that readers will know", "current reputation level? > 2. How would you deal with a user who", "attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions,", "and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light.", "our back-up questions for a total of 9 questions. We skipped one backup", "answer to this question, listing each of the questions, with your answer to", "something you consider off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive and you close/delete/migrate the post. The user takes the", "putting your name at the top of your post so that readers will", "what circumstances will you delete comments? > 5. A user posts something you", "user takes the issue to Meta and the question as well as answers", "you at your current reputation level? > 2. How would you deal with", " [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058) * [Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036) --- > > 1. What activities on the", "questions in quote format with a break in between each, suitable for you", "the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be", "- post an answer to this question, listing each of the questions, with", "post. The user takes the issue to Meta and the question as well", "from comments? > 3. How would you handle a situation where another mod", "between each, suitable for you to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole", "supporting and opposing your decision get a lot of upvotes. How do you", "In connection with the moderator elections, we are creating a Q&A thread for", "you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers,", "convenience, I will include all of the questions in quote format with a", "will you delete comments? > 5. A user posts something you consider off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive", "to do next? > 6. What question or answer of yours on meta", "do next? > 6. What question or answer of yours on meta best", "post an answer to this question, listing each of the questions, with your", "you to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the first", "9. A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said", "serve as the space for the candidates to provide their answers. Due to", "What question or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on", "valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?", "of our back-up questions for a total of 9 questions. We skipped one", "and the question as well as answers supporting and opposing your decision get", "decide what to do next? > 6. What question or answer of yours", "for a total of 9 questions. We skipped one backup question because it", "you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments.", "best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this is the", "candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please provide a link to", "suitable for you to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after", "as the submitted questions. As a candidate, your job is simple - post", "this question, listing each of the questions, with your answer to each question", "to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 3. How would", "that readers will know who you are before they finish reading everything you", "we have selected all provided questions as well as two of our back-up", "simple - post an answer to this question, listing each of the questions,", "your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this is the best example?", "you close/delete/migrate the post. The user takes the issue to Meta and the", "post so that readers will know who you are before they finish reading", "you will do will be seen under a different light. How do you", "given just below. For your convenience, I will include all of the questions", "tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 3. How", "do you feel this is the best example? > 7. What is your", "would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you", "page. Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed", "or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why", "scrolling here are links to the submissions from each candidate (in order of", "do? > 9. A diamond will be attached to everything you say and", "link to it after this blurb here, before that set of three dashes.", "provide their answers. Due to the submission count, we have selected all provided", "How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that", "you have written, and also including a link to your answer on your", "below. For your convenience, I will include all of the questions in quote", "Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058) * [Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036) --- > > 1. What activities on the site suggest", "an answer to this question, listing each of the questions, with your answer", "> 9. A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have", "of links in the order of submission.** To save scrolling here are links", "of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good", "job is simple - post an answer to this question, listing each of", "best example? > 7. What is your field of study in academics? >", "of the questions in quote format with a break in between each, suitable", "be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that? >", "upvotes. How do you decide what to do next? > 6. What question", "you used the moderation tools available to you at your current reputation level?", "you consider off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive and you close/delete/migrate the post. The user takes the issue", "answer to each question given just below. For your convenience, I will include", "question, listing each of the questions, with your answer to each question given", "format with a break in between each, suitable for you to insert your", "7. What is your field of study in academics? > 8. In your", "delete comments? > 5. A user posts something you consider off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive and you", "Why do you feel this is the best example? > 7. What is", "would be a good moderator? How have you used the moderation tools available", "elections, we are creating a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from", "as two of our back-up questions for a total of 9 questions. We", "[Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118) * [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058) * [Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036) --- > > 1. What activities on", "said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do", "a good moderator? How have you used the moderation tools available to you", "consider off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive and you close/delete/migrate the post. The user takes the issue to", "this is the best example? > 7. What is your field of study", "comments? > 5. A user posts something you consider off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive and you close/delete/migrate", "user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate", "you decide what to do next? > 6. What question or answer of", "moderator? How have you used the moderation tools available to you at your", "total of 9 questions. We skipped one backup question because it covers similar", "in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will", "the moderator elections, we are creating a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions", "a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection) have", "dashes. Please leave the list of links in the order of submission.** To", "three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top of your post so", "diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in the", "to deal with. Under what circumstances will you delete comments? > 5. A", "order of submission): * [padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118) * [Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118) * [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058) * [Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036) ---", "blurb here, before that set of three dashes. Please leave the list of", "voters to view the thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked", "questions. We skipped one backup question because it covers similar ground as the", "[Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058) * [Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036) --- > > 1. What activities on the site", "your current reputation level? > 2. How would you deal with a user", "moderators do? > 9. A diamond will be attached to everything you say", "are creating a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier", "of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please provide a", "as well as two of our back-up questions for a total of 9", "the issue to Meta and the question as well as answers supporting and", "of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you", "Please leave the list of links in the order of submission. To save", "feel shouldn't have been? > 4. As a moderator, I find that comments", "submission): * [padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118) * [Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118) * [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058) * [Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036) --- > >", "for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection) have been compiled into", "covers similar ground as the submitted questions. As a candidate, your job is", "deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but", "that you feel shouldn't have been? > 4. As a moderator, I find", "listing each of the questions, with your answer to each question given just", "available to you at your current reputation level? > 2. How would you", "completed your answer, please provide a link to it after this blurb here,", "number of arguments/flags from comments? > 3. How would you handle a situation", "at the top of your post so that readers will know who you", "reading everything you have written, and also including a link to your answer", "collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection) have been compiled into this one, which shall", "and you close/delete/migrate the post. The user takes the issue to Meta and", "decision get a lot of upvotes. How do you decide what to do", "academics? > 8. In your opinion, what do moderators do? > 9. A", "your field of study in academics? > 8. In your opinion, what do", "in academics? > 8. In your opinion, what do moderators do? > 9.", "one backup question because it covers similar ground as the submitted questions. As", "candidates to provide their answers. Due to the submission count, we have selected", "example? > 7. What is your field of study in academics? > 8.", "6. What question or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy", "candidate, your job is simple - post an answer to this question, listing", "closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been? > 4. As a", "be attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including", "Meta and the question as well as answers supporting and opposing your decision", "as the space for the candidates to provide their answers. Due to the", "be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck to all of the", "here, before that set of three dashes. Please leave the list of links", "to the submissions from each candidate (in order of submission): * [padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118) ", "you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel", "thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection) have been compiled into this one, which shall now serve as the", "three dashes. Please leave the list of links in the order of submission.", "A user posts something you consider off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive and you close/delete/migrate the post. The", "the submissions from each candidate (in order of submission): [padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118) * [Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118)", "and when you've completed your answer, please provide a link to it after", "creating a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection)", "of three dashes. Please leave the list of links in the order of", "you would be a good moderator? How have you used the moderation tools", "with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends", "are a tricky thing to deal with. Under what circumstances will you delete", "with a break in between each, suitable for you to insert your answers.", "your answer, please provide a link to it after this blurb here, before", "questions as well as two of our back-up questions for a total of", "the questions, with your answer to each question given just below. For your", "leave the list of links in the order of submission. To save scrolling", "deal with. Under what circumstances will you delete comments? > 5. A user", "your convenience, I will include all of the questions in quote format with", "circumstances will you delete comments? > 5. A user posts something you consider", "[Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036) --- > > 1. What activities on the site suggest that you", "will be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck to all of", "break in between each, suitable for you to insert your answers. Just [copy", "> > 1. What activities on the site suggest that you would be", "have been compiled, this will serve as a transcript for voters to view", "question or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation?", "including a link to your answer on your nomination post. Once all the", "with. Under what circumstances will you delete comments? > 5. A user posts", "your decision get a lot of upvotes. How do you decide what to", "a break in between each, suitable for you to insert your answers. Just", "readers will know who you are before they finish reading everything you have", "after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the", "your answer to each question given just below. For your convenience, I will", "a link to it after this blurb here, before that set of three", "to all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please", "suggest that you would be a good moderator? How have you used the", "that comments are a tricky thing to deal with. Under what circumstances will", "to it after this blurb here, before that set of three dashes. Please", "of your post so that readers will know who you are before they", "answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do", "because it covers similar ground as the submitted questions. As a candidate, your", "moderation? Why do you feel this is the best example? > 7. What", "is simple - post an answer to this question, listing each of the", "your post so that readers will know who you are before they finish", "before they finish reading everything you have written, and also including a link", "it covers similar ground as the submitted questions. As a candidate, your job", "do you decide what to do next? > 6. What question or answer", "ground as the submitted questions. As a candidate, your job is simple -", "Just [copy the whole thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please consider", "selected all provided questions as well as two of our back-up questions for", "off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive and you close/delete/migrate the post. The user takes the issue to Meta", "the site suggest that you would be a good moderator? How have you", "yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel", "stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags", "question as well as answers supporting and opposing your decision get a lot", "one, which shall now serve as the space for the candidates to provide", "connection with the moderator elections, we are creating a Q&A thread for the", "We skipped one backup question because it covers similar ground as the submitted", "with the moderator elections, we are creating a Q&A thread for the candidates.", "moderator, I find that comments are a tricky thing to deal with. Under", "appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck to all of the candidates!", "all of the questions in quote format with a break in between each,", "everything you have written, and also including a link to your answer on", "a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have", "skipped one backup question because it covers similar ground as the submitted questions.", "in the order of submission. To save scrolling here are links to the", "of 9 questions. We skipped one backup question because it covers similar ground", "compiled, this will serve as a transcript for voters to view the thoughts", "produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large", "will serve as a transcript for voters to view the thoughts of their", "answer, please provide a link to it after this blurb here, before that", "written, and also including a link to your answer on your nomination post.", "I will include all of the questions in quote format with a break", "the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please provide a link", "will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that?", "question given just below. For your convenience, I will include all of the", "How do you decide what to do next? > 6. What question or", "of the questions, with your answer to each question given just below. For", "meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this is", "lot of upvotes. How do you decide what to do next? > 6.", "where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been? >", "please provide a link to it after this blurb here, before that set", "candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection) have been compiled into this one,", "opposing your decision get a lot of upvotes. How do you decide what", "serve as a transcript for voters to view the thoughts of their candidates,", "(in order of submission): * [padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118) * [Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118) * [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058) * [Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036)", "submission.** To save scrolling here are links to the submissions from each candidate", "been? > 4. As a moderator, I find that comments are a tricky", "philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this is the best example? >", "activities on the site suggest that you would be a good moderator? How", "know who you are before they finish reading everything you have written, and", "post. Once all the answers have been compiled, this will serve as a", "earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection) have been compiled into this one, which shall now serve as", "as well as answers supporting and opposing your decision get a lot of", "* [Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036) --- > > 1. What activities on the site suggest that", "> 6. What question or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your", "to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers", "close/delete/migrate the post. The user takes the issue to Meta and the question", "of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top of your post", "candidate (in order of submission): * [padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118) * [Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118) * [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058) ", "Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection) have been compiled into this one, which", "Once all the answers have been compiled, this will serve as a transcript", "[from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection) have been compiled into this one, which shall now", "provided questions as well as two of our back-up questions for a total", "As a candidate, your job is simple - post an answer to this", "to the submission count, we have selected all provided questions as well as", "your nomination post. Once all the answers have been compiled, this will serve", "here are links to the submissions from each candidate (in order of submission):", "have written, and also including a link to your answer on your nomination", "will know who you are before they finish reading everything you have written,", "feel this is the best example? > 7. What is your field of", "Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How do", "How have you used the moderation tools available to you at your current", "the whole thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please consider putting your", "A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in", "a link to your answer on your nomination post. Once all the answers", "> 2. How would you deal with a user who produced a steady", "find that comments are a tricky thing to deal with. Under what circumstances", "> 8. In your opinion, what do moderators do? > 9. A diamond", "The user takes the issue to Meta and the question as well as", "luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer,", "what to do next? > 6. What question or answer of yours on", "a candidate, your job is simple - post an answer to this question,", "answer on your nomination post. Once all the answers have been compiled, this", "been compiled into this one, which shall now serve as the space for", "backup question because it covers similar ground as the submitted questions. As a", "as answers supporting and opposing your decision get a lot of upvotes. How", "you delete comments? > 5. A user posts something you consider off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive and", "each, suitable for you to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing", "when you've completed your answer, please provide a link to it after this", "set of three dashes. Please leave the list of links in the order", "do moderators do? > 9. A diamond will be attached to everything you", "all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please provide", "good moderator? How have you used the moderation tools available to you at", "a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number", "and opposing your decision get a lot of upvotes. How do you decide", "dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top of your post so that", "I find that comments are a tricky thing to deal with. Under what", "[copy the whole thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please consider putting", "submitted questions. As a candidate, your job is simple - post an answer", "What activities on the site suggest that you would be a good moderator?", "have you used the moderation tools available to you at your current reputation", "you feel this is the best example? > 7. What is your field", "past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen", "used the moderation tools available to you at your current reputation level? >", "back-up questions for a total of 9 questions. We skipped one backup question", "your job is simple - post an answer to this question, listing each", "all provided questions as well as two of our back-up questions for a", "linked in the Election page. Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh,", "answers supporting and opposing your decision get a lot of upvotes. How do", "been compiled, this will serve as a transcript for voters to view the", "will include all of the questions in quote format with a break in", "well as two of our back-up questions for a total of 9 questions.", "of arguments/flags from comments? > 3. How would you handle a situation where", "each question given just below. For your convenience, I will include all of", "thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the Election page.", "set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top of your", "of submission): [padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118) * [Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118) * [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058) * [Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036) --- >", "nomination post. Once all the answers have been compiled, this will serve as", "field of study in academics? > 8. In your opinion, what do moderators", "1. What activities on the site suggest that you would be a good", "comments? > 3. How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc", "--- > > 1. What activities on the site suggest that you would", "Under what circumstances will you delete comments? > 5. A user posts something", "another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been? > 4.", "a total of 9 questions. We skipped one backup question because it covers", "transcript for voters to view the thoughts of their candidates, and will be", "who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a", "answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different", "for the candidates to provide their answers. Due to the submission count, we", "the submission count, we have selected all provided questions as well as two", "arguments/flags from comments? > 3. How would you handle a situation where another", "* [Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118) * [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058) * [Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036) --- > > 1. What activities", "are links to the submissions from each candidate (in order of submission): ", "similar ground as the submitted questions. As a candidate, your job is simple", "submission count, we have selected all provided questions as well as two of", "tricky thing to deal with. Under what circumstances will you delete comments? >", "5. A user posts something you consider off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive and you close/delete/migrate the post.", "they finish reading everything you have written, and also including a link to", "a moderator, I find that comments are a tricky thing to deal with.", "a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to", "shouldn't have been? > 4. As a moderator, I find that comments are", "count, we have selected all provided questions as well as two of our", "on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this", "> 4. As a moderator, I find that comments are a tricky thing", "order of submission.* To save scrolling here are links to the submissions from", "site suggest that you would be a good moderator? How have you used", "questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a", "name at the top of your post so that readers will know who", "as a transcript for voters to view the thoughts of their candidates, and", "the moderation tools available to you at your current reputation level? > 2.", "everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and", "To save scrolling here are links to the submissions from each candidate (in", "takes the issue to Meta and the question as well as answers supporting", "Election page. Good luck to all of the candidates! *Oh, and when you've", "at your current reputation level? > 2. How would you deal with a", "the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top", "submissions from each candidate (in order of submission): [padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118) * [Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118) ", "generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 3. How would you", "As a moderator, I find that comments are a tricky thing to deal", "list of links in the order of submission.* To save scrolling here are", "it after this blurb here, before that set of three dashes. Please leave", "situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been?", "two of our back-up questions for a total of 9 questions. We skipped", "the top of your post so that readers will know who you are", "the best example? > 7. What is your field of study in academics?", "have selected all provided questions as well as two of our back-up questions", "your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the first set of three", "but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 3.", "questions, with your answer to each question given just below. For your convenience,", "from each candidate (in order of submission): * [padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118) * [Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118) * [Massimo", "in between each, suitable for you to insert your answers. Just [copy the", "to you at your current reputation level? > 2. How would you deal", "we are creating a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an", "are before they finish reading everything you have written, and also including a", "to your answer on your nomination post. Once all the answers have been", "8. In your opinion, what do moderators do? > 9. A diamond will", "the order of submission.** To save scrolling here are links to the submissions", "link to your answer on your nomination post. Once all the answers have", "into this one, which shall now serve as the space for the candidates", "* [padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118) * [Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118) * [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058) * [Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036) --- > > 1.", "for you to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the", "each of the questions, with your answer to each question given just below.", "the questions in quote format with a break in between each, suitable for", "you are before they finish reading everything you have written, and also including", "answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? >", "also including a link to your answer on your nomination post. Once all", "the candidates to provide their answers. Due to the submission count, we have", "shall now serve as the space for the candidates to provide their answers.", "2. How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream", "your answer on your nomination post. Once all the answers have been compiled,", "*Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please provide a link to it", "For your convenience, I will include all of the questions in quote format", "[padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118) [Fomite](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4031/118) * [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4034/20058) * [Wrzlprmft](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4036) --- > > 1. What", "to this question, listing each of the questions, with your answer to each", "all the answers have been compiled, this will serve as a transcript for", "seen under a different light. How do you feel about that? > >", "user posts something you consider off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive and you close/delete/migrate the post. The user", "the Election page. Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and when", "include all of the questions in quote format with a break in between", "9 questions. We skipped one backup question because it covers similar ground as", "before that set of three dashes. Please leave the list of links in", "do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about", "next? > 6. What question or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies", "answers have been compiled, this will serve as a transcript for voters to", "will do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel", "moderation tools available to you at your current reputation level? > 2. How", "get a lot of upvotes. How do you decide what to do next?", "is the best example? > 7. What is your field of study in", "of upvotes. How do you decide what to do next? > 6. What", "posts something you consider off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive and you close/delete/migrate the post. The user takes", "a question that you feel shouldn't have been? > 4. As a moderator,", "the question as well as answers supporting and opposing your decision get a", "finish reading everything you have written, and also including a link to your", "What is your field of study in academics? > 8. In your opinion,", "first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top of", "a transcript for voters to view the thoughts of their candidates, and will", "now serve as the space for the candidates to provide their answers. Due", "opinion, what do moderators do? > 9. A diamond will be attached to", "a tricky thing to deal with. Under what circumstances will you delete comments?", "level? > 2. How would you deal with a user who produced a", "you've completed your answer, please provide a link to it after this blurb", "in quote format with a break in between each, suitable for you to", "whole thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/dd90db94-b3b0-4e18-ab91-19548d040770/view-source).Please consider putting your name", "issue to Meta and the question as well as answers supporting and opposing", "have been? > 4. As a moderator, I find that comments are a", "which shall now serve as the space for the candidates to provide their", "the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4008/2018-moderator-election-qa-question-collection) have been compiled into this", "will be attached to everything you say and have said in the past,", "who you are before they finish reading everything you have written, and also", "> 5. A user posts something you consider off-topic/not-an-answer/offensive and you close/delete/migrate the", "consider putting your name at the top of your post so that readers", "would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable", "handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't", "comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How", "large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 3. How would you handle a", "candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck to", "How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of", "on your nomination post. Once all the answers have been compiled, this will", "that set of three dashes. Please leave the list of links in the", "space for the candidates to provide their answers. Due to the submission count,", "a large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 3. How would you handle", "have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will", "their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck", "a lot of upvotes. How do you decide what to do next? >", "exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this is the best", "in the Election page. Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and", "well as answers supporting and opposing your decision get a lot of upvotes.", "on the site suggest that you would be a good moderator? How have", "say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything", "just below. For your convenience, I will include all of the questions in", "> 1. What activities on the site suggest that you would be a", "links to the submissions from each candidate (in order of submission): * [padawan](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4030/118)", "steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of", "this blurb here, before that set of three dashes. Please leave the list", "your opinion, what do moderators do? > 9. A diamond will be attached", "to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the first set", "quote format with a break in between each, suitable for you to insert", "so that readers will know who you are before they finish reading everything", "of study in academics? > 8. In your opinion, what do moderators do?", "with your answer to each question given just below. For your convenience, I", "provide a link to it after this blurb here, before that set of" ]
[ "repercussions from the site? I should mention, on Math SE I'm usually either", "answer score and I may face repercussions from the site? I should mention,", "about what was asked, my solution attempt was wrong or I didn't explain", "answers with heavy downvotes is likely to decrease my answer score and I", "I'm starting to believe I either made some grave mistake in the answer", "(or both), but I don't know which and asking the community on meta", "I realize I actually don't know an answer, I just delete my answer,", "given a comment I can either improve my answer well or, if I", "I was writing a lengthy post about \"Why downvotes? Please explain so I", "it, even when I can't understand why it is bad? On a technical", "wrong or I didn't explain well. In that case given a comment I", "made some grave mistake in the answer I cannot recognize because of my", "if I realize I actually don't know an answer, I just delete my", "seemed to agree with the other commentators (e.g. 12 upvotes on one) but", "community convinced me to believe that my answer is bad. Should I now", "received by the community, getting below score of -5 and some comments pointing", "because of my lack of ability to do so, or I have some", "grave mistake in the answer I cannot recognize because of my lack of", "because I can see that it doesn't help anyone. But here at academics,", "meta feels like nagging and inappropriate. Either way, the community convinced me to", "to agree with the other commentators (e.g. 12 upvotes on one) but almost", "answer, because I can see that it doesn't help anyone. But here at", "\"Why downvotes? Please explain so I can improve!\" but I noticed it had", "starting to believe I either made some grave mistake in the answer I", "or they simply didn't read them, I don't know. So since I'm a", "well. In that case given a comment I can either improve my answer", "score of -5 and some comments pointing things out I may have missed.", "on Math SE I'm usually either wrong about what was asked, my solution", "just delete my answer, because I can see that it doesn't help anyone.", "very nagging character. Instead, let's do it more professional! So image I have", "the community, getting below score of -5 and some comments pointing things out", "upvotes on one) but almost always disagree with my answers (no upvotes), or", "answer that isn't well received by the community, getting below score of -5", "or, if I realize I actually don't know an answer, I just delete", "on meta feels like nagging and inappropriate. Either way, the community convinced me", "and I may face repercussions from the site? I should mention, on Math", "be easily influenced by nature, I'm starting to believe I either made some", "isn't well received by the community, getting below score of -5 and some", "improve!\" but I noticed it had a very nagging character. Instead, let's do", "asking the community on meta feels like nagging and inappropriate. Either way, the", "likely to decrease my answer score and I may face repercussions from the", "(e.g. 12 upvotes on one) but almost always disagree with my answers (no", "my [answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105236/how-to-review-bogus-science-without-hurting-feelings/105240#105240). I was writing a lengthy post about \"Why downvotes? Please explain", "I didn't explain well. In that case given a comment I can either", "had a very nagging character. Instead, let's do it more professional! So image", "may have missed. I reacted to the comments explaining, but the community seemed", "is bad? On a technical note, having answers with heavy downvotes is likely", "explain so I can improve!\" but I noticed it had a very nagging", "answer is bad. Should I now delete it, even when I can't understand", "simply didn't read them, I don't know. So since I'm a beginner academic", "see that it doesn't help anyone. But here at academics, I'm at loss.", "more professional! So image I have posted an answer that isn't well received", "the community convinced me to believe that my answer is bad. Should I", "me to believe that my answer is bad. Should I now delete it,", "what was asked, my solution attempt was wrong or I didn't explain well.", "answer well or, if I realize I actually don't know an answer, I", "believe I either made some grave mistake in the answer I cannot recognize", "should mention, on Math SE I'm usually either wrong about what was asked,", "anything) and can be easily influenced by nature, I'm starting to believe I", "didn't explain well. In that case given a comment I can either improve", "well or, if I realize I actually don't know an answer, I just", "one) but almost always disagree with my answers (no upvotes), or they simply", "like nagging and inappropriate. Either way, the community convinced me to believe that", "do it more professional! So image I have posted an answer that isn't", "character. Instead, let's do it more professional! So image I have posted an", "to do so, or I have some extremely unorthodox point of view that", "I can improve!\" but I noticed it had a very nagging character. Instead,", "answers (no upvotes), or they simply didn't read them, I don't know. So", "score and I may face repercussions from the site? I should mention, on", "post about \"Why downvotes? Please explain so I can improve!\" but I noticed", "some extremely unorthodox point of view that is frowned upon (or both), but", "have some extremely unorthodox point of view that is frowned upon (or both),", "of my lack of ability to do so, or I have some extremely", "things out I may have missed. I reacted to the comments explaining, but", "writing a lengthy post about \"Why downvotes? Please explain so I can improve!\"", "I either made some grave mistake in the answer I cannot recognize because", "didn't read them, I don't know. So since I'm a beginner academic (if", "answer I cannot recognize because of my lack of ability to do so,", "technical note, having answers with heavy downvotes is likely to decrease my answer", "even when I can't understand why it is bad? On a technical note,", "well received by the community, getting below score of -5 and some comments", "they simply didn't read them, I don't know. So since I'm a beginner", "face repercussions from the site? I should mention, on Math SE I'm usually", "way, the community convinced me to believe that my answer is bad. Should", "both), but I don't know which and asking the community on meta feels", "my answer score and I may face repercussions from the site? I should", "I just delete my answer, because I can see that it doesn't help", "reacted to the comments explaining, but the community seemed to agree with the", "read them, I don't know. So since I'm a beginner academic (if anything)", "that it doesn't help anyone. But here at academics, I'm at loss. [Related", "comment I can either improve my answer well or, if I realize I", "I have posted an answer that isn't well received by the community, getting", "can see that it doesn't help anyone. But here at academics, I'm at", "So image I have posted an answer that isn't well received by the", "and inappropriate. Either way, the community convinced me to believe that my answer", "and some comments pointing things out I may have missed. I reacted to", "unorthodox point of view that is frowned upon (or both), but I don't", "with the other commentators (e.g. 12 upvotes on one) but almost always disagree", "with my answers (no upvotes), or they simply didn't read them, I don't", "having answers with heavy downvotes is likely to decrease my answer score and", "I cannot recognize because of my lack of ability to do so, or", "to decrease my answer score and I may face repercussions from the site?", "from the site? I should mention, on Math SE I'm usually either wrong", "explain well. In that case given a comment I can either improve my", "that is frowned upon (or both), but I don't know which and asking", "pointing things out I may have missed. I reacted to the comments explaining,", "is frowned upon (or both), but I don't know which and asking the", "asked, my solution attempt was wrong or I didn't explain well. In that", "almost always disagree with my answers (no upvotes), or they simply didn't read", "Either way, the community convinced me to believe that my answer is bad.", "[question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105236/how-to-review-bogus-science-without-hurting-feelings) and my [answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105236/how-to-review-bogus-science-without-hurting-feelings/105240#105240). I was writing a lengthy post about \"Why downvotes?", "and my [answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105236/how-to-review-bogus-science-without-hurting-feelings/105240#105240). I was writing a lengthy post about \"Why downvotes? Please", "to the comments explaining, but the community seemed to agree with the other", "comments explaining, but the community seemed to agree with the other commentators (e.g.", "I'm a beginner academic (if anything) and can be easily influenced by nature,", "a very nagging character. Instead, let's do it more professional! So image I", "(if anything) and can be easily influenced by nature, I'm starting to believe", "some grave mistake in the answer I cannot recognize because of my lack", "the answer I cannot recognize because of my lack of ability to do", "the community on meta feels like nagging and inappropriate. Either way, the community", "site? I should mention, on Math SE I'm usually either wrong about what", "I actually don't know an answer, I just delete my answer, because I", "other commentators (e.g. 12 upvotes on one) but almost always disagree with my", "but I noticed it had a very nagging character. Instead, let's do it", "or I have some extremely unorthodox point of view that is frowned upon", "convinced me to believe that my answer is bad. Should I now delete", "or I didn't explain well. In that case given a comment I can", "ability to do so, or I have some extremely unorthodox point of view", "I can't understand why it is bad? On a technical note, having answers", "-5 and some comments pointing things out I may have missed. I reacted", "some comments pointing things out I may have missed. I reacted to the", "the comments explaining, but the community seemed to agree with the other commentators", "don't know which and asking the community on meta feels like nagging and", "know which and asking the community on meta feels like nagging and inappropriate.", "it more professional! So image I have posted an answer that isn't well", "So since I'm a beginner academic (if anything) and can be easily influenced", "In that case given a comment I can either improve my answer well", "delete my answer, because I can see that it doesn't help anyone. But", "an answer that isn't well received by the community, getting below score of", "but I don't know which and asking the community on meta feels like", "either made some grave mistake in the answer I cannot recognize because of", "a comment I can either improve my answer well or, if I realize", "was asked, my solution attempt was wrong or I didn't explain well. In", "it doesn't help anyone. But here at academics, I'm at loss. [Related Meta-Post.](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/163730/when-should-i-delete-an-answer)", "to believe that my answer is bad. Should I now delete it, even", "that my answer is bad. Should I now delete it, even when I", "understand why it is bad? On a technical note, having answers with heavy", "Math SE I'm usually either wrong about what was asked, my solution attempt", "can't understand why it is bad? On a technical note, having answers with", "noticed it had a very nagging character. Instead, let's do it more professional!", "a lengthy post about \"Why downvotes? Please explain so I can improve!\" but", "I may have missed. I reacted to the comments explaining, but the community", "feels like nagging and inappropriate. Either way, the community convinced me to believe", "a beginner academic (if anything) and can be easily influenced by nature, I'm", "since I'm a beginner academic (if anything) and can be easily influenced by", "know. So since I'm a beginner academic (if anything) and can be easily", "mention, on Math SE I'm usually either wrong about what was asked, my", "community, getting below score of -5 and some comments pointing things out I", "don't know. So since I'm a beginner academic (if anything) and can be", "note, having answers with heavy downvotes is likely to decrease my answer score", "know an answer, I just delete my answer, because I can see that", "extremely unorthodox point of view that is frowned upon (or both), but I", "out I may have missed. I reacted to the comments explaining, but the", "improve my answer well or, if I realize I actually don't know an", "by the community, getting below score of -5 and some comments pointing things", "cannot recognize because of my lack of ability to do so, or I", "my lack of ability to do so, or I have some extremely unorthodox", "but almost always disagree with my answers (no upvotes), or they simply didn't", "the other commentators (e.g. 12 upvotes on one) but almost always disagree with", "SE I'm usually either wrong about what was asked, my solution attempt was", "and asking the community on meta feels like nagging and inappropriate. Either way,", "do so, or I have some extremely unorthodox point of view that is", "image I have posted an answer that isn't well received by the community,", "I can see that it doesn't help anyone. But here at academics, I'm", "(no upvotes), or they simply didn't read them, I don't know. So since", "I noticed it had a very nagging character. Instead, let's do it more", "I may face repercussions from the site? I should mention, on Math SE", "so, or I have some extremely unorthodox point of view that is frowned", "actually don't know an answer, I just delete my answer, because I can", "lengthy post about \"Why downvotes? Please explain so I can improve!\" but I", "explaining, but the community seemed to agree with the other commentators (e.g. 12", "on one) but almost always disagree with my answers (no upvotes), or they", "them, I don't know. So since I'm a beginner academic (if anything) and", "solution attempt was wrong or I didn't explain well. In that case given", "disagree with my answers (no upvotes), or they simply didn't read them, I", "realize I actually don't know an answer, I just delete my answer, because", "attempt was wrong or I didn't explain well. In that case given a", "now delete it, even when I can't understand why it is bad? On", "bad. Should I now delete it, even when I can't understand why it", "missed. I reacted to the comments explaining, but the community seemed to agree", "inappropriate. Either way, the community convinced me to believe that my answer is", "decrease my answer score and I may face repercussions from the site? I", "wrong about what was asked, my solution attempt was wrong or I didn't", "either improve my answer well or, if I realize I actually don't know", "comments pointing things out I may have missed. I reacted to the comments", "agree with the other commentators (e.g. 12 upvotes on one) but almost always", "which and asking the community on meta feels like nagging and inappropriate. Either", "I should mention, on Math SE I'm usually either wrong about what was", "I'm usually either wrong about what was asked, my solution attempt was wrong", "by nature, I'm starting to believe I either made some grave mistake in", "I can either improve my answer well or, if I realize I actually", "have posted an answer that isn't well received by the community, getting below", "can be easily influenced by nature, I'm starting to believe I either made", "the site? I should mention, on Math SE I'm usually either wrong about", "community on meta feels like nagging and inappropriate. Either way, the community convinced", "to believe I either made some grave mistake in the answer I cannot", "in the answer I cannot recognize because of my lack of ability to", "upvotes), or they simply didn't read them, I don't know. So since I'm", "with heavy downvotes is likely to decrease my answer score and I may", "was wrong or I didn't explain well. In that case given a comment", "so I can improve!\" but I noticed it had a very nagging character.", "case given a comment I can either improve my answer well or, if", "heavy downvotes is likely to decrease my answer score and I may face", "I reacted to the comments explaining, but the community seemed to agree with", "but the community seemed to agree with the other commentators (e.g. 12 upvotes", "let's do it more professional! So image I have posted an answer that", "beginner academic (if anything) and can be easily influenced by nature, I'm starting", "is bad. Should I now delete it, even when I can't understand why", "easily influenced by nature, I'm starting to believe I either made some grave", "why it is bad? On a technical note, having answers with heavy downvotes", "usually either wrong about what was asked, my solution attempt was wrong or", "Please explain so I can improve!\" but I noticed it had a very", "I don't know. So since I'm a beginner academic (if anything) and can", "of -5 and some comments pointing things out I may have missed. I", "that case given a comment I can either improve my answer well or,", "I have some extremely unorthodox point of view that is frowned upon (or", "downvotes? Please explain so I can improve!\" but I noticed it had a", "of view that is frowned upon (or both), but I don't know which", "the community seemed to agree with the other commentators (e.g. 12 upvotes on", "is likely to decrease my answer score and I may face repercussions from", "community seemed to agree with the other commentators (e.g. 12 upvotes on one)", "my solution attempt was wrong or I didn't explain well. In that case", "delete it, even when I can't understand why it is bad? On a", "have missed. I reacted to the comments explaining, but the community seemed to", "it is bad? On a technical note, having answers with heavy downvotes is", "can either improve my answer well or, if I realize I actually don't", "nagging and inappropriate. Either way, the community convinced me to believe that my", "and can be easily influenced by nature, I'm starting to believe I either", "about \"Why downvotes? Please explain so I can improve!\" but I noticed it", "influenced by nature, I'm starting to believe I either made some grave mistake", "either wrong about what was asked, my solution attempt was wrong or I", "frowned upon (or both), but I don't know which and asking the community", "was writing a lengthy post about \"Why downvotes? Please explain so I can", "point of view that is frowned upon (or both), but I don't know", "Example: The [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105236/how-to-review-bogus-science-without-hurting-feelings) and my [answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105236/how-to-review-bogus-science-without-hurting-feelings/105240#105240). I was writing a lengthy post about", "it had a very nagging character. Instead, let's do it more professional! So", "recognize because of my lack of ability to do so, or I have", "that isn't well received by the community, getting below score of -5 and", "I don't know which and asking the community on meta feels like nagging", "always disagree with my answers (no upvotes), or they simply didn't read them,", "The [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105236/how-to-review-bogus-science-without-hurting-feelings) and my [answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105236/how-to-review-bogus-science-without-hurting-feelings/105240#105240). I was writing a lengthy post about \"Why", "my answers (no upvotes), or they simply didn't read them, I don't know.", "academic (if anything) and can be easily influenced by nature, I'm starting to", "can improve!\" but I noticed it had a very nagging character. Instead, let's", "upon (or both), but I don't know which and asking the community on", "when I can't understand why it is bad? On a technical note, having", "may face repercussions from the site? I should mention, on Math SE I'm", "downvotes is likely to decrease my answer score and I may face repercussions", "my answer well or, if I realize I actually don't know an answer,", "getting below score of -5 and some comments pointing things out I may", "Should I now delete it, even when I can't understand why it is", "answer, I just delete my answer, because I can see that it doesn't", "nature, I'm starting to believe I either made some grave mistake in the", "my answer is bad. Should I now delete it, even when I can't", "below score of -5 and some comments pointing things out I may have", "don't know an answer, I just delete my answer, because I can see", "posted an answer that isn't well received by the community, getting below score", "12 upvotes on one) but almost always disagree with my answers (no upvotes),", "a technical note, having answers with heavy downvotes is likely to decrease my", "my answer, because I can see that it doesn't help anyone. But here", "nagging character. Instead, let's do it more professional! So image I have posted", "Instead, let's do it more professional! So image I have posted an answer", "lack of ability to do so, or I have some extremely unorthodox point", "bad? On a technical note, having answers with heavy downvotes is likely to", "commentators (e.g. 12 upvotes on one) but almost always disagree with my answers", "of ability to do so, or I have some extremely unorthodox point of", "I now delete it, even when I can't understand why it is bad?", "believe that my answer is bad. Should I now delete it, even when", "On a technical note, having answers with heavy downvotes is likely to decrease", "mistake in the answer I cannot recognize because of my lack of ability", "[answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105236/how-to-review-bogus-science-without-hurting-feelings/105240#105240). I was writing a lengthy post about \"Why downvotes? Please explain so", "professional! So image I have posted an answer that isn't well received by", "an answer, I just delete my answer, because I can see that it", "view that is frowned upon (or both), but I don't know which and" ]
[ "I wouldn't surprise if the down-votes appears at the time I asked the", "be well fitted here. But I am wondering why someone is perhaps intentionally", "low-scored questions asked here? I wouldn't surprise if the down-votes appears at the", "asked here? I wouldn't surprise if the down-votes appears at the time I", "fitted here. But I am wondering why someone is perhaps intentionally down-voting my", "is perhaps intentionally down-voting my old low-scored questions asked here? I wouldn't surprise", "This question may not be well fitted here. But I am wondering why", "if the down-votes appears at the time I asked the question. But the", "the time I asked the question. But the down-voter is targeting my old", "time I asked the question. But the down-voter is targeting my old low-scored", "Although I don't care the votes or scores at all, but still wondering", "someone is perhaps intentionally down-voting my old low-scored questions asked here? I wouldn't", "surprise if the down-votes appears at the time I asked the question. But", "asked the question. But the down-voter is targeting my old low-scored questions. I", "But the down-voter is targeting my old low-scored questions. I would appreciate if", "same down-voter gives some up-votes to my high-scored questions. But I can't see", "But I can't see it. Although I don't care the votes or scores", "questions asked here? I wouldn't surprise if the down-votes appears at the time", "perhaps intentionally down-voting my old low-scored questions asked here? I wouldn't surprise if", "old low-scored questions asked here? I wouldn't surprise if the down-votes appears at", "I am wondering why someone is perhaps intentionally down-voting my old low-scored questions", "wouldn't surprise if the down-votes appears at the time I asked the question.", "would appreciate if the same down-voter gives some up-votes to my high-scored questions.", "to my high-scored questions. But I can't see it. Although I don't care", "questions. But I can't see it. Although I don't care the votes or", "I don't care the votes or scores at all, but still wondering the", "I asked the question. But the down-voter is targeting my old low-scored questions.", "care the votes or scores at all, but still wondering the possible reasons", "here? I wouldn't surprise if the down-votes appears at the time I asked", "I can't see it. Although I don't care the votes or scores at", "some up-votes to my high-scored questions. But I can't see it. Although I", "question. But the down-voter is targeting my old low-scored questions. I would appreciate", "gives some up-votes to my high-scored questions. But I can't see it. Although", "well fitted here. But I am wondering why someone is perhaps intentionally down-voting", "my high-scored questions. But I can't see it. Although I don't care the", "can't see it. Although I don't care the votes or scores at all,", "don't care the votes or scores at all, but still wondering the possible", "here. But I am wondering why someone is perhaps intentionally down-voting my old", "question may not be well fitted here. But I am wondering why someone", "down-votes appears at the time I asked the question. But the down-voter is", "it. Although I don't care the votes or scores at all, but still", "appears at the time I asked the question. But the down-voter is targeting", "I would appreciate if the same down-voter gives some up-votes to my high-scored", "down-voter is targeting my old low-scored questions. I would appreciate if the same", "wondering why someone is perhaps intentionally down-voting my old low-scored questions asked here?", "if the same down-voter gives some up-votes to my high-scored questions. But I", "down-voter gives some up-votes to my high-scored questions. But I can't see it.", "votes or scores at all, but still wondering the possible reasons for it.", "the down-votes appears at the time I asked the question. But the down-voter", "my old low-scored questions. I would appreciate if the same down-voter gives some", "may not be well fitted here. But I am wondering why someone is", "old low-scored questions. I would appreciate if the same down-voter gives some up-votes", "see it. Although I don't care the votes or scores at all, but", "appreciate if the same down-voter gives some up-votes to my high-scored questions. But", "intentionally down-voting my old low-scored questions asked here? I wouldn't surprise if the", "targeting my old low-scored questions. I would appreciate if the same down-voter gives", "why someone is perhaps intentionally down-voting my old low-scored questions asked here? I", "But I am wondering why someone is perhaps intentionally down-voting my old low-scored", "at the time I asked the question. But the down-voter is targeting my", "questions. I would appreciate if the same down-voter gives some up-votes to my", "not be well fitted here. But I am wondering why someone is perhaps", "am wondering why someone is perhaps intentionally down-voting my old low-scored questions asked", "down-voting my old low-scored questions asked here? I wouldn't surprise if the down-votes", "the votes or scores at all, but still wondering the possible reasons for", "my old low-scored questions asked here? I wouldn't surprise if the down-votes appears", "the question. But the down-voter is targeting my old low-scored questions. I would", "is targeting my old low-scored questions. I would appreciate if the same down-voter", "the down-voter is targeting my old low-scored questions. I would appreciate if the", "low-scored questions. I would appreciate if the same down-voter gives some up-votes to", "up-votes to my high-scored questions. But I can't see it. Although I don't", "the same down-voter gives some up-votes to my high-scored questions. But I can't", "high-scored questions. But I can't see it. Although I don't care the votes" ]
[ "to call this an \"ethics\" question. \"Is this insulting?\" isn't actually a matter", "> > On the moral code or ethical policy of academia, including values", "could be (it's currently our 12th most popular tag) as well as answers", "sir or miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss) - I think this is a stretch to call this", "miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss) - I think this is a stretch to call this an \"ethics\"", "way to handle this? I think actual discussions of ethics are interesting, and", "a very serious accusation, so I dislike that it's being heavily diluted in", "the current definition? > > On the moral code or ethical policy of", "our 12th most popular tag) as well as answers and comments being bogged", "is often a very serious accusation, so I dislike that it's being heavily", "being heavily diluted in terms of its meaning. Do we consider heavily editing", "current definition? > > On the moral code or ethical policy of academia,", "as avoidance of cheating or plagiarism; > > > Or do we just", "that aren't actually about ethics? If so, do we need to fine-tune the", "values such as avoidance of cheating or plagiarism; > > > Or do", "in terms of its meaning. Do we consider heavily editing questions/deleting tags for", "ethical...\" are potentially meaning: 1. \"Is X ethical...\" in the proper sense 2.", "the point of the tag itself being much less useful than it could", "code or ethical policy of academia, including values such as avoidance of cheating", "or plagiarism; > > > Or do we just let it slide? Some", "meaning. Do we consider heavily editing questions/deleting tags for things that aren't actually", "Do we consider heavily editing questions/deleting tags for things that aren't actually about", "holder as sir or miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss) - I think this is a stretch to", "popular tag) as well as answers and comments being bogged down by disambiguating", "individual...\" etc. Is there a good way to handle this? I think actual", "as well as answers and comments being bogged down by disambiguating \"Is X", "[Is it considered rude to address a PhD holder as sir or miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss)", "* [Is it considered rude to address a PhD holder as sir or", "we consider heavily editing questions/deleting tags for things that aren't actually about ethics?", "aren't actually about ethics? If so, do we need to fine-tune the current", "\"Is X nice...\" 4. \"Can I be upset by X...\" 5. \"Is my", "idea...\" 3. \"Is X nice...\" 4. \"Can I be upset by X...\" 5.", "- I think this is a stretch to call this an \"ethics\" question.", "are interesting, and a violation of academic ethics is often a very serious", "of \"ethics\" on this site - I think it's overused to the point", "answers and comments being bogged down by disambiguating \"Is X ethical...\" are potentially", "very serious accusation, so I dislike that it's being heavily diluted in terms", "request: * [Is it considered rude to address a PhD holder as sir", "to the point of the tag itself being much less useful than it", "in the proper sense 2. \"Is X a good idea...\" 3. \"Is X", "X a good idea...\" 3. \"Is X nice...\" 4. \"Can I be upset", "upset by X...\" 5. \"Is my advisor/classmate/teacher/etc. a less than perfect individual...\" etc.", "Or do we just let it slide? Some examples, per Wrzlprmft's request: ", "etc. Is there a good way to handle this? I think actual discussions", "a good way to handle this? I think actual discussions of ethics are", "think this is a stretch to call this an \"ethics\" question. \"Is this", "matter of ethics. [Contacting EiC on social media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media) - Again, this is", "do we just let it slide? Some examples, per Wrzlprmft's request: * [Is", "for things that aren't actually about ethics? If so, do we need to", "considered rude to address a PhD holder as sir or miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss) - I", "[Contacting EiC on social media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media) - Again, this is far more \"Is this", "5. \"Is my advisor/classmate/teacher/etc. a less than perfect individual...\" etc. Is there a", "- Again, this is far more \"Is this a bad idea?\" than is", "I think it's overused to the point of the tag itself being much", "\"Is X ethical...\" are potentially meaning: 1. \"Is X ethical...\" in the proper", "overused to the point of the tag itself being much less useful than", "it's overused to the point of the tag itself being much less useful", "accusation, so I dislike that it's being heavily diluted in terms of its", "> > Or do we just let it slide? Some examples, per Wrzlprmft's", "it considered rude to address a PhD holder as sir or miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss) -", "we need to fine-tune the current definition? > > On the moral code", "an \"ethics\" question. \"Is this insulting?\" isn't actually a matter of ethics. ", "my advisor/classmate/teacher/etc. a less than perfect individual...\" etc. Is there a good way", "Is there a good way to handle this? I think actual discussions of", "there a good way to handle this? I think actual discussions of ethics", "interesting, and a violation of academic ethics is often a very serious accusation,", "PhD holder as sir or miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss) - I think this is a stretch", "this insulting?\" isn't actually a matter of ethics. [Contacting EiC on social", "is a stretch to call this an \"ethics\" question. \"Is this insulting?\" isn't", "to fine-tune the current definition? > > On the moral code or ethical", "bogged down by disambiguating \"Is X ethical...\" are potentially meaning: 1. \"Is X", "plagiarism; > > > Or do we just let it slide? Some examples,", "isn't actually a matter of ethics. * [Contacting EiC on social media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media) -", "12th most popular tag) as well as answers and comments being bogged down", "less useful than it could be (it's currently our 12th most popular tag)", "- I think it's overused to the point of the tag itself being", "X ethical...\" are potentially meaning: 1. \"Is X ethical...\" in the proper sense", "X ethical...\" in the proper sense 2. \"Is X a good idea...\" 3.", "academic ethics is often a very serious accusation, so I dislike that it's", "it's being heavily diluted in terms of its meaning. Do we consider heavily", "editing questions/deleting tags for things that aren't actually about ethics? If so, do", "terms of its meaning. Do we consider heavily editing questions/deleting tags for things", "much less useful than it could be (it's currently our 12th most popular", "question. \"Is this insulting?\" isn't actually a matter of ethics. * [Contacting EiC", "including values such as avoidance of cheating or plagiarism; > > > Or", "violation of academic ethics is often a very serious accusation, so I dislike", "a matter of ethics. * [Contacting EiC on social media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media) - Again, this", "the proper sense 2. \"Is X a good idea...\" 3. \"Is X nice...\"", "itself being much less useful than it could be (it's currently our 12th", "so I dislike that it's being heavily diluted in terms of its meaning.", "I be upset by X...\" 5. \"Is my advisor/classmate/teacher/etc. a less than perfect", "or miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss) - I think this is a stretch to call this an", "good way to handle this? I think actual discussions of ethics are interesting,", "recently with the use of \"ethics\" on this site - I think it's", "by X...\" 5. \"Is my advisor/classmate/teacher/etc. a less than perfect individual...\" etc. Is", "as sir or miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss) - I think this is a stretch to call", "\"Is my advisor/classmate/teacher/etc. a less than perfect individual...\" etc. Is there a good", "tags for things that aren't actually about ethics? If so, do we need", "1. \"Is X ethical...\" in the proper sense 2. \"Is X a good", "by disambiguating \"Is X ethical...\" are potentially meaning: 1. \"Is X ethical...\" in", "actual discussions of ethics are interesting, and a violation of academic ethics is", "think actual discussions of ethics are interesting, and a violation of academic ethics", "a violation of academic ethics is often a very serious accusation, so I", "heavily editing questions/deleting tags for things that aren't actually about ethics? If so,", "definition? > > On the moral code or ethical policy of academia, including", "this site - I think it's overused to the point of the tag", "site - I think it's overused to the point of the tag itself", "been struggling recently with the use of \"ethics\" on this site - I", "tag) as well as answers and comments being bogged down by disambiguating \"Is", "are potentially meaning: 1. \"Is X ethical...\" in the proper sense 2. \"Is", "so, do we need to fine-tune the current definition? > > On the", "academia, including values such as avoidance of cheating or plagiarism; > > >", "stretch to call this an \"ethics\" question. \"Is this insulting?\" isn't actually a", "Wrzlprmft's request: * [Is it considered rude to address a PhD holder as", "comments being bogged down by disambiguating \"Is X ethical...\" are potentially meaning: 1.", "moral code or ethical policy of academia, including values such as avoidance of", "need to fine-tune the current definition? > > On the moral code or", "slide? Some examples, per Wrzlprmft's request: * [Is it considered rude to address", "struggling recently with the use of \"ethics\" on this site - I think", "dislike that it's being heavily diluted in terms of its meaning. Do we", "it could be (it's currently our 12th most popular tag) as well as", "questions/deleting tags for things that aren't actually about ethics? If so, do we", "of academic ethics is often a very serious accusation, so I dislike that", "currently our 12th most popular tag) as well as answers and comments being", "of cheating or plagiarism; > > > Or do we just let it", "X...\" 5. \"Is my advisor/classmate/teacher/etc. a less than perfect individual...\" etc. Is there", "heavily diluted in terms of its meaning. Do we consider heavily editing questions/deleting", "address a PhD holder as sir or miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss) - I think this is", "things that aren't actually about ethics? If so, do we need to fine-tune", "If so, do we need to fine-tune the current definition? > > On", "examples, per Wrzlprmft's request: * [Is it considered rude to address a PhD", "\"Is this insulting?\" isn't actually a matter of ethics. * [Contacting EiC on", "be (it's currently our 12th most popular tag) as well as answers and", "good idea...\" 3. \"Is X nice...\" 4. \"Can I be upset by X...\"", "of ethics. * [Contacting EiC on social media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media) - Again, this is far", "ethics? If so, do we need to fine-tune the current definition? > >", "On the moral code or ethical policy of academia, including values such as", "avoidance of cheating or plagiarism; > > > Or do we just let", "ethics are interesting, and a violation of academic ethics is often a very", "I've been struggling recently with the use of \"ethics\" on this site -", "advisor/classmate/teacher/etc. a less than perfect individual...\" etc. Is there a good way to", "down by disambiguating \"Is X ethical...\" are potentially meaning: 1. \"Is X ethical...\"", "(it's currently our 12th most popular tag) as well as answers and comments", "tag itself being much less useful than it could be (it's currently our", "ethical...\" in the proper sense 2. \"Is X a good idea...\" 3. \"Is", "be upset by X...\" 5. \"Is my advisor/classmate/teacher/etc. a less than perfect individual...\"", "I think actual discussions of ethics are interesting, and a violation of academic", "handle this? I think actual discussions of ethics are interesting, and a violation", "Again, this is far more \"Is this a bad idea?\" than is this", "this? I think actual discussions of ethics are interesting, and a violation of", "that it's being heavily diluted in terms of its meaning. Do we consider", "* [Contacting EiC on social media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media) - Again, this is far more \"Is", "nice...\" 4. \"Can I be upset by X...\" 5. \"Is my advisor/classmate/teacher/etc. a", "often a very serious accusation, so I dislike that it's being heavily diluted", "just let it slide? Some examples, per Wrzlprmft's request: * [Is it considered", "its meaning. Do we consider heavily editing questions/deleting tags for things that aren't", "being bogged down by disambiguating \"Is X ethical...\" are potentially meaning: 1. \"Is", "media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media) - Again, this is far more \"Is this a bad idea?\" than", "this an \"ethics\" question. \"Is this insulting?\" isn't actually a matter of ethics.", "or ethical policy of academia, including values such as avoidance of cheating or", "on this site - I think it's overused to the point of the", "with the use of \"ethics\" on this site - I think it's overused", "and a violation of academic ethics is often a very serious accusation, so", "rude to address a PhD holder as sir or miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss) - I think", "\"ethics\" on this site - I think it's overused to the point of", "ethics. * [Contacting EiC on social media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media) - Again, this is far more", "proper sense 2. \"Is X a good idea...\" 3. \"Is X nice...\" 4.", "\"Can I be upset by X...\" 5. \"Is my advisor/classmate/teacher/etc. a less than", "4. \"Can I be upset by X...\" 5. \"Is my advisor/classmate/teacher/etc. a less", "such as avoidance of cheating or plagiarism; > > > Or do we", "than it could be (it's currently our 12th most popular tag) as well", "this is a stretch to call this an \"ethics\" question. \"Is this insulting?\"", "ethical policy of academia, including values such as avoidance of cheating or plagiarism;", "I think this is a stretch to call this an \"ethics\" question. \"Is", "a less than perfect individual...\" etc. Is there a good way to handle", "well as answers and comments being bogged down by disambiguating \"Is X ethical...\"", "EiC on social media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media) - Again, this is far more \"Is this a", "\"Is X ethical...\" in the proper sense 2. \"Is X a good idea...\"", "of academia, including values such as avoidance of cheating or plagiarism; > >", "> Or do we just let it slide? Some examples, per Wrzlprmft's request:", "sense 2. \"Is X a good idea...\" 3. \"Is X nice...\" 4. \"Can", "let it slide? Some examples, per Wrzlprmft's request: * [Is it considered rude", "potentially meaning: 1. \"Is X ethical...\" in the proper sense 2. \"Is X", "to address a PhD holder as sir or miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss) - I think this", "\"ethics\" question. \"Is this insulting?\" isn't actually a matter of ethics. * [Contacting", "per Wrzlprmft's request: * [Is it considered rude to address a PhD holder", "of ethics are interesting, and a violation of academic ethics is often a", "disambiguating \"Is X ethical...\" are potentially meaning: 1. \"Is X ethical...\" in the", "a stretch to call this an \"ethics\" question. \"Is this insulting?\" isn't actually", "fine-tune the current definition? > > On the moral code or ethical policy", "it slide? Some examples, per Wrzlprmft's request: * [Is it considered rude to", "X nice...\" 4. \"Can I be upset by X...\" 5. \"Is my advisor/classmate/teacher/etc.", "most popular tag) as well as answers and comments being bogged down by", "ethics is often a very serious accusation, so I dislike that it's being", "use of \"ethics\" on this site - I think it's overused to the", "> On the moral code or ethical policy of academia, including values such", "Some examples, per Wrzlprmft's request: * [Is it considered rude to address a", "actually a matter of ethics. * [Contacting EiC on social media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media) - Again,", "about ethics? If so, do we need to fine-tune the current definition? >", "social media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media) - Again, this is far more \"Is this a bad idea?\"", "and comments being bogged down by disambiguating \"Is X ethical...\" are potentially meaning:", "less than perfect individual...\" etc. Is there a good way to handle this?", "think it's overused to the point of the tag itself being much less", "this is far more \"Is this a bad idea?\" than is this ethical.", "serious accusation, so I dislike that it's being heavily diluted in terms of", "the use of \"ethics\" on this site - I think it's overused to", "I dislike that it's being heavily diluted in terms of its meaning. Do", "being much less useful than it could be (it's currently our 12th most", "of the tag itself being much less useful than it could be (it's", "as answers and comments being bogged down by disambiguating \"Is X ethical...\" are", "meaning: 1. \"Is X ethical...\" in the proper sense 2. \"Is X a", "\"Is X a good idea...\" 3. \"Is X nice...\" 4. \"Can I be", "discussions of ethics are interesting, and a violation of academic ethics is often", "actually about ethics? If so, do we need to fine-tune the current definition?", "consider heavily editing questions/deleting tags for things that aren't actually about ethics? If", "on social media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media) - Again, this is far more \"Is this a bad", "diluted in terms of its meaning. Do we consider heavily editing questions/deleting tags", "a PhD holder as sir or miss?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/104867/is-it-considered-rude-to-address-a-phd-holder-as-sir-or-miss) - I think this is a", "of its meaning. Do we consider heavily editing questions/deleting tags for things that", "to handle this? I think actual discussions of ethics are interesting, and a", "policy of academia, including values such as avoidance of cheating or plagiarism; >", "call this an \"ethics\" question. \"Is this insulting?\" isn't actually a matter of", "a good idea...\" 3. \"Is X nice...\" 4. \"Can I be upset by", "the moral code or ethical policy of academia, including values such as avoidance", "2. \"Is X a good idea...\" 3. \"Is X nice...\" 4. \"Can I", "do we need to fine-tune the current definition? > > On the moral", "the tag itself being much less useful than it could be (it's currently", "insulting?\" isn't actually a matter of ethics. * [Contacting EiC on social media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/105557/contacting-eic-on-social-media)", "> > > Or do we just let it slide? Some examples, per", "3. \"Is X nice...\" 4. \"Can I be upset by X...\" 5. \"Is", "we just let it slide? Some examples, per Wrzlprmft's request: * [Is it", "point of the tag itself being much less useful than it could be", "useful than it could be (it's currently our 12th most popular tag) as", "perfect individual...\" etc. Is there a good way to handle this? I think", "than perfect individual...\" etc. Is there a good way to handle this? I", "cheating or plagiarism; > > > Or do we just let it slide?" ]
[ "this question to read further details, but to keep all discussion in one", "from this question to read further details, but to keep all discussion in", "to express your opinions as answers to this question here. I was recently", "suggest to express your opinions as answers to this question here. I was", "question here. I was recently involved in a discussion about cranks in science,", "for Paranormal Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal) Please follow the links from this question to read further", "is an Area 51 proposal for Paranormal Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal) Please follow the links from", "involved in a discussion about cranks in science, so I'm very intrigued what", "Area 51 proposal for Paranormal Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal) Please follow the links from this question", "science, so I'm very intrigued what you think. (Blatantly copied in parts from", "so I'm very intrigued what you think. (Blatantly copied in parts from [this", "I suggest to express your opinions as answers to this question here. I", "[There is an Area 51 proposal for Paranormal Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal) Please follow the links", "opinions as answers to this question here. I was recently involved in a", "one place, I suggest to express your opinions as answers to this question", "think. (Blatantly copied in parts from [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1896/openscience-and-academia-qa-sites) to make sure to stay", "proposal for Paranormal Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal) Please follow the links from this question to read", "51 proposal for Paranormal Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal) Please follow the links from this question to", "details, but to keep all discussion in one place, I suggest to express", "this question here. I was recently involved in a discussion about cranks in", "intrigued what you think. (Blatantly copied in parts from [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1896/openscience-and-academia-qa-sites) to make", "what you think. (Blatantly copied in parts from [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1896/openscience-and-academia-qa-sites) to make sure", "viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following situation. [There is an Area 51", "what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following situation. [There is", "the links from this question to read further details, but to keep all", "follow the links from this question to read further details, but to keep", "community on the following situation. [There is an Area 51 proposal for Paranormal", "It would be interesting to learn what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community", "learn what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following situation. [There", "to this question here. I was recently involved in a discussion about cranks", "but to keep all discussion in one place, I suggest to express your", "your opinions as answers to this question here. I was recently involved in", "very intrigued what you think. (Blatantly copied in parts from [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1896/openscience-and-academia-qa-sites) to", "Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal) Please follow the links from this question to read further details, but", "discussion about cranks in science, so I'm very intrigued what you think. (Blatantly", "Paranormal Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal) Please follow the links from this question to read further details,", "all discussion in one place, I suggest to express your opinions as answers", "keep all discussion in one place, I suggest to express your opinions as", "cranks in science, so I'm very intrigued what you think. (Blatantly copied in", "situation. [There is an Area 51 proposal for Paranormal Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal) Please follow the", "you think. (Blatantly copied in parts from [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1896/openscience-and-academia-qa-sites) to make sure to", "discussion in one place, I suggest to express your opinions as answers to", "interesting to learn what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following", "to keep all discussion in one place, I suggest to express your opinions", "place, I suggest to express your opinions as answers to this question here.", "in science, so I'm very intrigued what you think. (Blatantly copied in parts", "as answers to this question here. I was recently involved in a discussion", "is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following situation. [There is an", "to read further details, but to keep all discussion in one place, I", "the following situation. [There is an Area 51 proposal for Paranormal Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal) Please", "in a discussion about cranks in science, so I'm very intrigued what you", "in one place, I suggest to express your opinions as answers to this", "here. I was recently involved in a discussion about cranks in science, so", "an Area 51 proposal for Paranormal Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal) Please follow the links from this", "recently involved in a discussion about cranks in science, so I'm very intrigued", "to learn what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following situation.", "(Blatantly copied in parts from [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1896/openscience-and-academia-qa-sites) to make sure to stay on-topic.)", "Please follow the links from this question to read further details, but to", "on the following situation. [There is an Area 51 proposal for Paranormal Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal)", "would be interesting to learn what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on", "links from this question to read further details, but to keep all discussion", "question to read further details, but to keep all discussion in one place,", "read further details, but to keep all discussion in one place, I suggest", "express your opinions as answers to this question here. I was recently involved", "Academia.SE community on the following situation. [There is an Area 51 proposal for", "I'm very intrigued what you think. (Blatantly copied in parts from [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1896/openscience-and-academia-qa-sites)", "be interesting to learn what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the", "of Academia.SE community on the following situation. [There is an Area 51 proposal", "further details, but to keep all discussion in one place, I suggest to", "answers to this question here. I was recently involved in a discussion about", "the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following situation. [There is an Area", "I was recently involved in a discussion about cranks in science, so I'm", "about cranks in science, so I'm very intrigued what you think. (Blatantly copied", "was recently involved in a discussion about cranks in science, so I'm very", "following situation. [There is an Area 51 proposal for Paranormal Phenomenons.](https://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/114464/paranormal) Please follow", "a discussion about cranks in science, so I'm very intrigued what you think." ]
[ "the ropes! For details on how the voting played out, you can download", "votes have been tallied, and the moderator is: [![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734) They'll be joining [the", "advice with them as they learn the ropes! For details on how the", "For details on how the voting played out, you can download the election", "has come to a close, the votes have been tallied, and the moderator", "crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly — please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and", "the votes have been tallied, and the moderator is: [![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734) They'll be joining", "shortly — please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice", "and share your assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes!", "out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2), or [view a summary report", "and the moderator is: [![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly —", "moderator election](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2) has come to a close, the votes have been tallied, and", "Academia's [second moderator election](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2) has come to a close, the votes have been", "a close, the votes have been tallied, and the moderator is: [![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734) They'll", "for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as they learn", "share your assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes! For", "come to a close, the votes have been tallied, and the moderator is:", "with them as they learn the ropes! For details on how the voting", "[the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly — please thank them for volunteering, and share your", "them as they learn the ropes! For details on how the voting played", "joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly — please thank them for volunteering, and share", "you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2), or [view a summary report online](https://www.opavote.com/results/4963713824063488/0).", "They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly — please thank them for volunteering,", "please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them", "ropes! For details on how the voting played out, you can download the", "on how the voting played out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2),", "they learn the ropes! For details on how the voting played out, you", "is: [![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly — please thank them", "details on how the voting played out, you can download the election results", "how the voting played out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2), or", "existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly — please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance", "be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly — please thank them for volunteering, and", "[second moderator election](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2) has come to a close, the votes have been tallied,", "election](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2) has come to a close, the votes have been tallied, and the", "moderator is: [![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly — please thank", "learn the ropes! For details on how the voting played out, you can", "played out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2), or [view a summary", "and advice with them as they learn the ropes! For details on how", "close, the votes have been tallied, and the moderator is: [![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734) They'll be", "— please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with", "thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as", "have been tallied, and the moderator is: [![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734) They'll be joining [the existing", "as they learn the ropes! For details on how the voting played out,", "been tallied, and the moderator is: [![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators)", "your assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes! For details", "voting played out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2), or [view a", "assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes! For details on", "the moderator is: [![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly — please", "to a close, the votes have been tallied, and the moderator is: [![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734)", "tallied, and the moderator is: [![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly", "them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as they", "the voting played out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/2), or [view", "[![Wrzlprmft](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/7734.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly — please thank them for", "volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as they learn the" ]
[ "you want. But when I asked what is unclear nobody answered or commented.", "know what is vague. Ironically they are unclear for the reason in putting", "very strange that some people handle such a detailed question in this way", "mean and even a link to the content I am talking about. Some", "when I ask what is vague no answer or comment. The question is", "The question is how to know what is vague? I want to know", "what is vague. Ironically they are unclear for the reason in putting this", "OnHold because they say It is not clear what you want. But when", "clear what you want. But when I asked what is unclear nobody answered", "or comment. The question is how to know what is vague? I want", "and even a link to the content I am talking about. Some people", "Some people put the question OnHold because they say It is not clear", "this way and when I ask what is vague no answer or comment.", "I am talking about. Some people put the question OnHold because they say", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/106754/how-to-know-a-community-of-researchers-in-order-to-be-more-successful-in-researc?answertab=active#tab-top), I provide details about what I mean and even a link", "they say It is not clear what you want. But when I asked", "because they say It is not clear what you want. But when I", "a question. In [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/106754/how-to-know-a-community-of-researchers-in-order-to-be-more-successful-in-researc?answertab=active#tab-top), I provide details about what I mean and", "asked a question. In [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/106754/how-to-know-a-community-of-researchers-in-order-to-be-more-successful-in-researc?answertab=active#tab-top), I provide details about what I mean", "is how to know what is vague? I want to know what is", "link to the content I am talking about. Some people put the question", "is vague no answer or comment. The question is how to know what", "unclear for the reason in putting this question on hold. I hope somebody", "answered or commented. It is very strange that some people handle such a", "such a detailed question in this way and when I ask what is", "talking about. Some people put the question OnHold because they say It is", "people handle such a detailed question in this way and when I ask", "vague. Ironically they are unclear for the reason in putting this question on", "I mean and even a link to the content I am talking about.", "way and when I ask what is vague no answer or comment. The", "is not clear what you want. But when I asked what is unclear", "ask what is vague no answer or comment. The question is how to", "in this way and when I ask what is vague no answer or", "people put the question OnHold because they say It is not clear what", "vague? I want to know what is vague. Ironically they are unclear for", "question. In [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/106754/how-to-know-a-community-of-researchers-in-order-to-be-more-successful-in-researc?answertab=active#tab-top), I provide details about what I mean and even", "is very strange that some people handle such a detailed question in this", "what you want. But when I asked what is unclear nobody answered or", "comment. The question is how to know what is vague? I want to", "are unclear for the reason in putting this question on hold. I hope", "vague no answer or comment. The question is how to know what is", "question is how to know what is vague? I want to know what", "a detailed question in this way and when I ask what is vague", "In [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/106754/how-to-know-a-community-of-researchers-in-order-to-be-more-successful-in-researc?answertab=active#tab-top), I provide details about what I mean and even a", "I ask what is vague no answer or comment. The question is how", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/106754/how-to-know-a-community-of-researchers-in-order-to-be-more-successful-in-researc?answertab=active#tab-top), I provide details about what I mean and even a link to", "about. Some people put the question OnHold because they say It is not", "the question OnHold because they say It is not clear what you want.", "even a link to the content I am talking about. Some people put", "is unclear nobody answered or commented. It is very strange that some people", "question OnHold because they say It is not clear what you want. But", "what I mean and even a link to the content I am talking", "I have asked a question. In [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/106754/how-to-know-a-community-of-researchers-in-order-to-be-more-successful-in-researc?answertab=active#tab-top), I provide details about what", "not clear what you want. But when I asked what is unclear nobody", "some people handle such a detailed question in this way and when I", "they are unclear for the reason in putting this question on hold. I", "details about what I mean and even a link to the content I", "is vague. Ironically they are unclear for the reason in putting this question", "have asked a question. In [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/106754/how-to-know-a-community-of-researchers-in-order-to-be-more-successful-in-researc?answertab=active#tab-top), I provide details about what I", "It is very strange that some people handle such a detailed question in", "handle such a detailed question in this way and when I ask what", "and when I ask what is vague no answer or comment. The question", "am talking about. Some people put the question OnHold because they say It", "about what I mean and even a link to the content I am", "strange that some people handle such a detailed question in this way and", "answer or comment. The question is how to know what is vague? I", "I want to know what is vague. Ironically they are unclear for the", "want to know what is vague. Ironically they are unclear for the reason", "detailed question in this way and when I ask what is vague no", "It is not clear what you want. But when I asked what is", "how to know what is vague? I want to know what is vague.", "unclear nobody answered or commented. It is very strange that some people handle", "for the reason in putting this question on hold. I hope somebody will", "the content I am talking about. Some people put the question OnHold because", "what is unclear nobody answered or commented. It is very strange that some", "provide details about what I mean and even a link to the content", "is vague? I want to know what is vague. Ironically they are unclear", "the reason in putting this question on hold. I hope somebody will listen.", "I provide details about what I mean and even a link to the", "to the content I am talking about. Some people put the question OnHold", "put the question OnHold because they say It is not clear what you", "content I am talking about. Some people put the question OnHold because they", "that some people handle such a detailed question in this way and when", "question in this way and when I ask what is vague no answer", "know what is vague? I want to know what is vague. Ironically they", "what is vague? I want to know what is vague. Ironically they are", "no answer or comment. The question is how to know what is vague?", "commented. It is very strange that some people handle such a detailed question", "when I asked what is unclear nobody answered or commented. It is very", "to know what is vague. Ironically they are unclear for the reason in", "want. But when I asked what is unclear nobody answered or commented. It", "a link to the content I am talking about. Some people put the", "say It is not clear what you want. But when I asked what", "to know what is vague? I want to know what is vague. Ironically", "or commented. It is very strange that some people handle such a detailed", "nobody answered or commented. It is very strange that some people handle such", "what is vague no answer or comment. The question is how to know", "I asked what is unclear nobody answered or commented. It is very strange", "But when I asked what is unclear nobody answered or commented. It is", "Ironically they are unclear for the reason in putting this question on hold.", "asked what is unclear nobody answered or commented. It is very strange that" ]
[ "observations but mainly on bashing or praising the platform? In my experience, it", "on objective observations but mainly on bashing or praising the platform? In my", "was cited in favour of questions going into the same direction: [Is Peer.us", "altogether? If only some, where do we draw the line? * If we", "my experience, it is almost inevitable that such posts will happen, no matter", "useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734) The latter question in turn has attracted a controversial answer originating from", "In my experience, it is almost inevitable that such posts will happen, no", "a general rule how to deal with such questions and thus I ask:", "question in turn has attracted a controversial answer originating from the operators of", "questions, how shall we deal with opinionated answers and comments, i.e., answers not", "we deal with opinionated answers and comments, i.e., answers not focussing on objective", "received close votes in the past. I think it’s time for a general", "it is almost inevitable that such posts will happen, no matter how objective", "platform. Both questions have received close votes in the past. I think it’s", "thus I ask: * Shall we allow all such questions, only some of", "have at least one old unclosed question asking to evaluate some commercial online", "of that platform. Both questions have received close votes in the past. I", "deal with such questions and thus I ask: * Shall we allow all", "do we draw the line? * If we allow all or some of", "answers the question seeks. (Note that I explicitly exclude services without commercial goals,", "i.e., answers not focussing on objective observations but mainly on bashing or praising", "* Shall we allow all such questions, only some of them, or close", "into the same direction: [Is Peer.us useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734) The latter question in turn has", "matter how objective answers the question seeks. (Note that I explicitly exclude services", "think it’s time for a general rule how to deal with such questions", "platform? In my experience, it is almost inevitable that such posts will happen,", "no matter how objective answers the question seeks. (Note that I explicitly exclude", "only some, where do we draw the line? * If we allow all", "commercial online services: [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734) This was cited in favour of questions", "the question seeks. (Note that I explicitly exclude services without commercial goals, such", "of them, or close them altogether? If only some, where do we draw", "or close them altogether? If only some, where do we draw the line?", "how objective answers the question seeks. (Note that I explicitly exclude services without", "answer originating from the operators of that platform. Both questions have received close", "such questions and thus I ask: * Shall we allow all such questions,", "favour of questions going into the same direction: [Is Peer.us useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734) The latter", "We have at least one old unclosed question asking to evaluate some commercial", "for a general rule how to deal with such questions and thus I", "controversial answer originating from the operators of that platform. Both questions have received", "draw the line? * If we allow all or some of such questions,", "(Note that I explicitly exclude services without commercial goals, such as the Arxiv.)", "votes in the past. I think it’s time for a general rule how", "them altogether? If only some, where do we draw the line? * If", "not focussing on objective observations but mainly on bashing or praising the platform?", "focussing on objective observations but mainly on bashing or praising the platform? In", "how shall we deal with opinionated answers and comments, i.e., answers not focussing", "how to deal with such questions and thus I ask: * Shall we", "bashing or praising the platform? In my experience, it is almost inevitable that", "questions and thus I ask: * Shall we allow all such questions, only", "them, or close them altogether? If only some, where do we draw the", "the past. I think it’s time for a general rule how to deal", "some of such questions, how shall we deal with opinionated answers and comments,", "we allow all such questions, only some of them, or close them altogether?", "questions, only some of them, or close them altogether? If only some, where", "shall we deal with opinionated answers and comments, i.e., answers not focussing on", "is almost inevitable that such posts will happen, no matter how objective answers", "direction: [Is Peer.us useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734) The latter question in turn has attracted a controversial", "from the operators of that platform. Both questions have received close votes in", "or some of such questions, how shall we deal with opinionated answers and", "has attracted a controversial answer originating from the operators of that platform. Both", "services: [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734) This was cited in favour of questions going into", "Peer.us useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734) The latter question in turn has attracted a controversial answer originating", "If only some, where do we draw the line? * If we allow", "we allow all or some of such questions, how shall we deal with", "questions have received close votes in the past. I think it’s time for", "old unclosed question asking to evaluate some commercial online services: [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734)", "and comments, i.e., answers not focussing on objective observations but mainly on bashing", "mainly on bashing or praising the platform? In my experience, it is almost", "online services: [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734) This was cited in favour of questions going", "I ask: * Shall we allow all such questions, only some of them,", "some commercial online services: [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734) This was cited in favour of", "asking to evaluate some commercial online services: [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734) This was cited", "a controversial answer originating from the operators of that platform. Both questions have", "answers and comments, i.e., answers not focussing on objective observations but mainly on", "we draw the line? * If we allow all or some of such", "[Is Peer.us useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734) The latter question in turn has attracted a controversial answer", "allow all such questions, only some of them, or close them altogether? If", "some of them, or close them altogether? If only some, where do we", "answers not focussing on objective observations but mainly on bashing or praising the", "past. I think it’s time for a general rule how to deal with", "operators of that platform. Both questions have received close votes in the past.", "and thus I ask: * Shall we allow all such questions, only some", "of questions going into the same direction: [Is Peer.us useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734) The latter question", "that platform. Both questions have received close votes in the past. I think", "to deal with such questions and thus I ask: * Shall we allow", "Both questions have received close votes in the past. I think it’s time", "or praising the platform? In my experience, it is almost inevitable that such", "such questions, only some of them, or close them altogether? If only some,", "going into the same direction: [Is Peer.us useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734) The latter question in turn", "almost inevitable that such posts will happen, no matter how objective answers the", "close them altogether? If only some, where do we draw the line? ", "experience, it is almost inevitable that such posts will happen, no matter how", "one old unclosed question asking to evaluate some commercial online services: [Is Academia.edu", "the operators of that platform. Both questions have received close votes in the", "unclosed question asking to evaluate some commercial online services: [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734) This", "the platform? In my experience, it is almost inevitable that such posts will", "Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734) This was cited in favour of questions going into the same", "in the past. I think it’s time for a general rule how to", "seeks. (Note that I explicitly exclude services without commercial goals, such as the", "rule how to deal with such questions and thus I ask: Shall", "line? * If we allow all or some of such questions, how shall", "with opinionated answers and comments, i.e., answers not focussing on objective observations but", "useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734) This was cited in favour of questions going into the same direction:", "with such questions and thus I ask: * Shall we allow all such", "inevitable that such posts will happen, no matter how objective answers the question", "* If we allow all or some of such questions, how shall we", "same direction: [Is Peer.us useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734) The latter question in turn has attracted a", "will happen, no matter how objective answers the question seeks. (Note that I", "allow all or some of such questions, how shall we deal with opinionated", "least one old unclosed question asking to evaluate some commercial online services: [Is", "Shall we allow all such questions, only some of them, or close them", "time for a general rule how to deal with such questions and thus", "but mainly on bashing or praising the platform? In my experience, it is", "all such questions, only some of them, or close them altogether? If only", "where do we draw the line? * If we allow all or some", "evaluate some commercial online services: [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734) This was cited in favour", "of such questions, how shall we deal with opinionated answers and comments, i.e.,", "question asking to evaluate some commercial online services: [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734) This was", "I think it’s time for a general rule how to deal with such", "ask: * Shall we allow all such questions, only some of them, or", "it’s time for a general rule how to deal with such questions and", "The latter question in turn has attracted a controversial answer originating from the", "happen, no matter how objective answers the question seeks. (Note that I explicitly", "comments, i.e., answers not focussing on objective observations but mainly on bashing or", "deal with opinionated answers and comments, i.e., answers not focussing on objective observations", "close votes in the past. I think it’s time for a general rule", "only some of them, or close them altogether? If only some, where do", "turn has attracted a controversial answer originating from the operators of that platform.", "objective observations but mainly on bashing or praising the platform? In my experience,", "objective answers the question seeks. (Note that I explicitly exclude services without commercial", "latter question in turn has attracted a controversial answer originating from the operators", "[Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734) This was cited in favour of questions going into the", "the line? * If we allow all or some of such questions, how", "such posts will happen, no matter how objective answers the question seeks. (Note", "in favour of questions going into the same direction: [Is Peer.us useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734) The", "general rule how to deal with such questions and thus I ask: ", "posts will happen, no matter how objective answers the question seeks. (Note that", "cited in favour of questions going into the same direction: [Is Peer.us useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734)", "praising the platform? In my experience, it is almost inevitable that such posts", "question seeks. (Note that I explicitly exclude services without commercial goals, such as", "the same direction: [Is Peer.us useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734) The latter question in turn has attracted", "opinionated answers and comments, i.e., answers not focussing on objective observations but mainly", "that such posts will happen, no matter how objective answers the question seeks.", "questions going into the same direction: [Is Peer.us useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/106706/7734) The latter question in", "have received close votes in the past. I think it’s time for a", "such questions, how shall we deal with opinionated answers and comments, i.e., answers", "on bashing or praising the platform? In my experience, it is almost inevitable", "some, where do we draw the line? If we allow all or", "If we allow all or some of such questions, how shall we deal", "originating from the operators of that platform. Both questions have received close votes", "This was cited in favour of questions going into the same direction: [Is", "all or some of such questions, how shall we deal with opinionated answers", "in turn has attracted a controversial answer originating from the operators of that", "to evaluate some commercial online services: [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/44632/7734) This was cited in", "attracted a controversial answer originating from the operators of that platform. Both questions", "at least one old unclosed question asking to evaluate some commercial online services:" ]
[ "boilerplate comment? E.g., > > Please, avoid answering a question you voted to", "for a while. It doesn't happen frequently but, yes, it happens: a user", "votes to close it. Though not forbidden by the system, I think that", "doesn't happen frequently but, yes, it happens: a user answers a question and", "question and also votes to close it. Though not forbidden by the system,", "this for a while. It doesn't happen frequently but, yes, it happens: a", "answering a question you voted to close. See [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4077/20058). > >", "this expert user thinks that my question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever and answers", "it by commenting with a boilerplate comment? E.g., > > Please, avoid answering", "could we actively discourage it by commenting with a boilerplate comment? E.g., >", "they are new to the site: how come that this expert user thinks", "a boilerplate comment? E.g., > > Please, avoid answering a question you voted", "more reputation points. Should we thus discourage such kind of behaviour? If yes,", "especially when they are new to the site: how come that this expert", "ways: 1. It confuses the questioner, especially when they are new to the", "is off-topic, too-broad, whatever and answers it anyway? 2. It might give the", "happens: a user answers a question and also votes to close it. Though", "might give the message that, yes, the question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever, but", "been thinking of writing this for a while. It doesn't happen frequently but,", "points. Should we thus discourage such kind of behaviour? If yes, could we", "give the message that, yes, the question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever, but the", "It doesn't happen frequently but, yes, it happens: a user answers a question", "thinking of writing this for a while. It doesn't happen frequently but, yes,", "to get a few more reputation points. Should we thus discourage such kind", "close it. Though not forbidden by the system, I think that such kind", "by the system, I think that such kind of behaviour is bad in", "close answers it anyway to get a few more reputation points. Should we", "yes, could we actively discourage it by commenting with a boilerplate comment? E.g.,", "and answers it anyway? 2. It might give the message that, yes, the", "thus discourage such kind of behaviour? If yes, could we actively discourage it", "while. It doesn't happen frequently but, yes, it happens: a user answers a", "by commenting with a boilerplate comment? E.g., > > Please, avoid answering a", "with a boilerplate comment? E.g., > > Please, avoid answering a question you", "E.g., > > Please, avoid answering a question you voted to close. See", "too-broad, whatever, but the user who voted to close answers it anyway to", "questioner, especially when they are new to the site: how come that this", "discourage it by commenting with a boilerplate comment? E.g., > > Please, avoid", "1. It confuses the questioner, especially when they are new to the site:", "bad in two ways: 1. It confuses the questioner, especially when they are", "system, I think that such kind of behaviour is bad in two ways:", "also votes to close it. Though not forbidden by the system, I think", "If yes, could we actively discourage it by commenting with a boilerplate comment?", "expert user thinks that my question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever and answers it", "but, yes, it happens: a user answers a question and also votes to", "the site: how come that this expert user thinks that my question is", "a user answers a question and also votes to close it. Though not", "forbidden by the system, I think that such kind of behaviour is bad", "too-broad, whatever and answers it anyway? 2. It might give the message that,", "of behaviour is bad in two ways: 1. It confuses the questioner, especially", "such kind of behaviour is bad in two ways: 1. It confuses the", "that, yes, the question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever, but the user who voted", "Please, avoid answering a question you voted to close. See [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4077/20058).", "2. It might give the message that, yes, the question is off-topic, too-broad,", "happen frequently but, yes, it happens: a user answers a question and also", "discourage such kind of behaviour? If yes, could we actively discourage it by", "answers it anyway? 2. It might give the message that, yes, the question", "user who voted to close answers it anyway to get a few more", "in two ways: 1. It confuses the questioner, especially when they are new", "are new to the site: how come that this expert user thinks that", "get a few more reputation points. Should we thus discourage such kind of", "when they are new to the site: how come that this expert user", "anyway? 2. It might give the message that, yes, the question is off-topic,", "anyway to get a few more reputation points. Should we thus discourage such", "to the site: how come that this expert user thinks that my question", "the questioner, especially when they are new to the site: how come that", "that my question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever and answers it anyway? 2. It", "is bad in two ways: 1. It confuses the questioner, especially when they", "a few more reputation points. Should we thus discourage such kind of behaviour?", "user thinks that my question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever and answers it anyway?", "I think that such kind of behaviour is bad in two ways: 1.", "It confuses the questioner, especially when they are new to the site: how", "thinks that my question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever and answers it anyway? 2.", "few more reputation points. Should we thus discourage such kind of behaviour? If", "off-topic, too-broad, whatever and answers it anyway? 2. It might give the message", "the user who voted to close answers it anyway to get a few", "kind of behaviour? If yes, could we actively discourage it by commenting with", "of writing this for a while. It doesn't happen frequently but, yes, it", "is off-topic, too-broad, whatever, but the user who voted to close answers it", "and also votes to close it. Though not forbidden by the system, I", "we thus discourage such kind of behaviour? If yes, could we actively discourage", "such kind of behaviour? If yes, could we actively discourage it by commenting", "writing this for a while. It doesn't happen frequently but, yes, it happens:", "whatever, but the user who voted to close answers it anyway to get", "answers it anyway to get a few more reputation points. Should we thus", "of behaviour? If yes, could we actively discourage it by commenting with a", "commenting with a boilerplate comment? E.g., > > Please, avoid answering a question", "yes, it happens: a user answers a question and also votes to close", "answers a question and also votes to close it. Though not forbidden by", "not forbidden by the system, I think that such kind of behaviour is", "It might give the message that, yes, the question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever,", "the message that, yes, the question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever, but the user", "that this expert user thinks that my question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever and", "it anyway to get a few more reputation points. Should we thus discourage", "whatever and answers it anyway? 2. It might give the message that, yes,", "my question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever and answers it anyway? 2. It might", "Though not forbidden by the system, I think that such kind of behaviour", "how come that this expert user thinks that my question is off-topic, too-broad,", "Should we thus discourage such kind of behaviour? If yes, could we actively", "frequently but, yes, it happens: a user answers a question and also votes", "kind of behaviour is bad in two ways: 1. It confuses the questioner,", "a question and also votes to close it. Though not forbidden by the", "actively discourage it by commenting with a boilerplate comment? E.g., > > Please,", "user answers a question and also votes to close it. Though not forbidden", "> Please, avoid answering a question you voted to close. See [this meta", "it. Though not forbidden by the system, I think that such kind of", "who voted to close answers it anyway to get a few more reputation", "voted to close answers it anyway to get a few more reputation points.", "> > Please, avoid answering a question you voted to close. See [this", "new to the site: how come that this expert user thinks that my", "confuses the questioner, especially when they are new to the site: how come", "but the user who voted to close answers it anyway to get a", "to close answers it anyway to get a few more reputation points. Should", "I've been thinking of writing this for a while. It doesn't happen frequently", "a question you voted to close. See [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4077/20058). > > >", "two ways: 1. It confuses the questioner, especially when they are new to", "come that this expert user thinks that my question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever", "to close it. Though not forbidden by the system, I think that such", "comment? E.g., > > Please, avoid answering a question you voted to close.", "site: how come that this expert user thinks that my question is off-topic,", "avoid answering a question you voted to close. See [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4077/20058). >", "off-topic, too-broad, whatever, but the user who voted to close answers it anyway", "behaviour is bad in two ways: 1. It confuses the questioner, especially when", "the question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever, but the user who voted to close", "think that such kind of behaviour is bad in two ways: 1. It", "the system, I think that such kind of behaviour is bad in two", "question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever and answers it anyway? 2. It might give", "it happens: a user answers a question and also votes to close it.", "behaviour? If yes, could we actively discourage it by commenting with a boilerplate", "question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever, but the user who voted to close answers", "a while. It doesn't happen frequently but, yes, it happens: a user answers", "that such kind of behaviour is bad in two ways: 1. It confuses", "yes, the question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever, but the user who voted to", "we actively discourage it by commenting with a boilerplate comment? E.g., > >", "it anyway? 2. It might give the message that, yes, the question is", "reputation points. Should we thus discourage such kind of behaviour? If yes, could", "message that, yes, the question is off-topic, too-broad, whatever, but the user who" ]
[ "someone with a minimum of preconceptions. In some notable cases in the past,", "unique perspective from someone with a minimum of preconceptions. In some notable cases", "university staffer. It has been about 7 years since I last was in", "the past, such perspectives has led to stuff like unsolvable conjectures being solved,", "major advances in a number of scientific fields. From reading [another meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593),", "> * A user that, based on her/his bio and SE habitus, seems", "user that, based on her/his bio and SE habitus, seems trustworthy to answer", "typically downvote, with this answer getting over a dozen upvotes. Does this mean", "experience with academia, so I don't know any of the established procedures and", "In some notable cases in the past, such perspectives has led to stuff", "What I suggest might be completely inappropriate for someone who is active in", "from Academia. What I suggest might be completely inappropriate for someone who is", "perspective from someone with a minimum of preconceptions. In some notable cases in", "in the past, such perspectives has led to stuff like unsolvable conjectures being", "me to answer these questions. On one hand, I have no experience with", "bio and SE habitus, seems trustworthy to answer the question > > >", "answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593), I have seen at least one person explicitly mention > > ", "machines being invented and generally major advances in a number of scientific fields.", "> > as something they typically upvote and > > Answers that", "who is active in Academia. On the other hand, I have no experience", "to fall into the \"uninformed opinion\" category (\"I don't have experience with this,", "7 years since I last was in a school in the capacity of", "a student. Because of this, I'm not sure whether it's wholly appropriate for", "capacity of a student. Because of this, I'm not sure whether it's wholly", "least one person explicitly mention > > * A user that, based on", "> * Answers that seem to fall into the \"uninformed opinion\" category (\"I", "clearly ...\") > > > as something they typically downvote, with this answer", "dozen upvotes. Does this mean that this community does not want answers from", "community does not want answers from people who are not part of the", "* Answers that seem to fall into the \"uninformed opinion\" category (\"I don't", "completely inappropriate for someone who is active in Academia. On the other hand,", "and > > * Answers that seem to fall into the \"uninformed opinion\"", "interesting. I sometimes answer them and have acquired a small amount of rep", "frequently see questions from this stack in the Hot Network Questions list (the", "on her/his bio and SE habitus, seems trustworthy to answer the question >", "a unique perspective from someone with a minimum of preconceptions. In some notable", "that, based on her/his bio and SE habitus, seems trustworthy to answer the", "provide a unique perspective from someone with a minimum of preconceptions. In some", "is active in Academia. On the other hand, I have no experience with", "Hot Network Questions list (the network-wide list of questions in the right sidebar)", "student, professor, teacher, researcher or university staffer. It has been about 7 years", "from a couple of upvotes per answer. However, I'm not a scientist, student,", "her/his bio and SE habitus, seems trustworthy to answer the question > >", "have no experience with academia, so I don't know any of the established", "Academia. On the other hand, I have no experience with Academia, so I", "solved, impossible machines being invented and generally major advances in a number of", "> > * Answers that seem to fall into the \"uninformed opinion\" category", "that seem to fall into the \"uninformed opinion\" category (\"I don't have experience", "but clearly ...\") > > > as something they typically downvote, with this", "scientist, student, professor, teacher, researcher or university staffer. It has been about 7", "or university staffer. It has been about 7 years since I last was", "and generally major advances in a number of scientific fields. From reading [another", "student. Because of this, I'm not sure whether it's wholly appropriate for me", "small amount of rep from a couple of upvotes per answer. However, I'm", "Questions list (the network-wide list of questions in the right sidebar) that I", "staffer. It has been about 7 years since I last was in a", "questions from this stack in the Hot Network Questions list (the network-wide list", "last was in a school in the capacity of a student. Because of", "not sure whether it's wholly appropriate for me to answer these questions. On", "a minimum of preconceptions. In some notable cases in the past, such perspectives", "reading [another meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593), I have seen at least one person explicitly mention", "might be able to provide a unique perspective from someone with a minimum", "experience with this, but clearly ...\") > > > as something they typically", "this, I'm not sure whether it's wholly appropriate for me to answer these", "it's wholly appropriate for me to answer these questions. On one hand, I", "have seen at least one person explicitly mention > > * A user", "of this, I'm not sure whether it's wholly appropriate for me to answer", "impossible machines being invented and generally major advances in a number of scientific", "they typically downvote, with this answer getting over a dozen upvotes. Does this", "appropriate for me to answer these questions. On one hand, I have no", "this community does not want answers from people who are not part of", "they typically upvote and > > * Answers that seem to fall into", "the capacity of a student. Because of this, I'm not sure whether it's", "at least one person explicitly mention > > * A user that, based", "don't have experience with this, but clearly ...\") > > > as something", "a scientist, student, professor, teacher, researcher or university staffer. It has been about", "of the established procedures and rules from Academia. What I suggest might be", "into the \"uninformed opinion\" category (\"I don't have experience with this, but clearly", "perspectives has led to stuff like unsolvable conjectures being solved, impossible machines being", "one person explicitly mention > > * A user that, based on her/his", "to answer the question > > > as something they typically upvote and", "any of the established procedures and rules from Academia. What I suggest might", "led to stuff like unsolvable conjectures being solved, impossible machines being invented and", "stuff like unsolvable conjectures being solved, impossible machines being invented and generally major", "see questions from this stack in the Hot Network Questions list (the network-wide", "\"uninformed opinion\" category (\"I don't have experience with this, but clearly ...\") >", "> > * A user that, based on her/his bio and SE habitus,", "for me to answer these questions. On one hand, I have no experience", "fall into the \"uninformed opinion\" category (\"I don't have experience with this, but", "Does this mean that this community does not want answers from people who", "has been about 7 years since I last was in a school in", "I have no experience with academia, so I don't know any of the", "school in the capacity of a student. Because of this, I'm not sure", "someone who is active in Academia. On the other hand, I have no", "answer them and have acquired a small amount of rep from a couple", "[another meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593), I have seen at least one person explicitly mention >", "so I don't know any of the established procedures and rules from Academia.", "of questions in the right sidebar) that I find interesting. I sometimes answer", "in the right sidebar) that I find interesting. I sometimes answer them and", "might be completely inappropriate for someone who is active in Academia. On the", "the question > > > as something they typically upvote and > >", "fields. From reading [another meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593), I have seen at least one person", "generally major advances in a number of scientific fields. From reading [another meta", "* A user that, based on her/his bio and SE habitus, seems trustworthy", "able to provide a unique perspective from someone with a minimum of preconceptions.", "whether it's wholly appropriate for me to answer these questions. On one hand,", "so I might be able to provide a unique perspective from someone with", "with a minimum of preconceptions. In some notable cases in the past, such", "seem to fall into the \"uninformed opinion\" category (\"I don't have experience with", "Because of this, I'm not sure whether it's wholly appropriate for me to", "procedures and rules from Academia. What I suggest might be completely inappropriate for", "However, I'm not a scientist, student, professor, teacher, researcher or university staffer. It", "SE habitus, seems trustworthy to answer the question > > > as something", "downvote, with this answer getting over a dozen upvotes. Does this mean that", "Academia, so I might be able to provide a unique perspective from someone", "this answer getting over a dozen upvotes. Does this mean that this community", "the \"uninformed opinion\" category (\"I don't have experience with this, but clearly ...\")", "of rep from a couple of upvotes per answer. However, I'm not a", "to stuff like unsolvable conjectures being solved, impossible machines being invented and generally", "from this stack in the Hot Network Questions list (the network-wide list of", "category (\"I don't have experience with this, but clearly ...\") > > >", "something they typically downvote, with this answer getting over a dozen upvotes. Does", "such perspectives has led to stuff like unsolvable conjectures being solved, impossible machines", "was in a school in the capacity of a student. Because of this,", "these questions. On one hand, I have no experience with academia, so I", "I sometimes answer them and have acquired a small amount of rep from", "been about 7 years since I last was in a school in the", "I have seen at least one person explicitly mention > > * A", "in the capacity of a student. Because of this, I'm not sure whether", "suggest might be completely inappropriate for someone who is active in Academia. On", "seen at least one person explicitly mention > > * A user that,", "has led to stuff like unsolvable conjectures being solved, impossible machines being invented", "I suggest might be completely inappropriate for someone who is active in Academia.", "like unsolvable conjectures being solved, impossible machines being invented and generally major advances", "scientific fields. From reading [another meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593), I have seen at least one", "mention > > * A user that, based on her/his bio and SE", "a number of scientific fields. From reading [another meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593), I have seen", "question > > > as something they typically upvote and > > ", "in a number of scientific fields. From reading [another meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593), I have", "upvotes. Does this mean that this community does not want answers from people", "have acquired a small amount of rep from a couple of upvotes per", "I find interesting. I sometimes answer them and have acquired a small amount", "with academia, so I don't know any of the established procedures and rules", "of scientific fields. From reading [another meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593), I have seen at least", "sidebar) that I find interesting. I sometimes answer them and have acquired a", "rep from a couple of upvotes per answer. However, I'm not a scientist,", "in a school in the capacity of a student. Because of this, I'm", "to answer these questions. On one hand, I have no experience with academia,", "that this community does not want answers from people who are not part", "something they typically upvote and > > Answers that seem to fall", "couple of upvotes per answer. However, I'm not a scientist, student, professor, teacher,", "about 7 years since I last was in a school in the capacity", "Academia. What I suggest might be completely inappropriate for someone who is active", "I last was in a school in the capacity of a student. Because", "of a student. Because of this, I'm not sure whether it's wholly appropriate", "Network Questions list (the network-wide list of questions in the right sidebar) that", "list (the network-wide list of questions in the right sidebar) that I find", "of upvotes per answer. However, I'm not a scientist, student, professor, teacher, researcher", "be able to provide a unique perspective from someone with a minimum of", "the Hot Network Questions list (the network-wide list of questions in the right", "rules from Academia. What I suggest might be completely inappropriate for someone who", "past, such perspectives has led to stuff like unsolvable conjectures being solved, impossible", "being solved, impossible machines being invented and generally major advances in a number", "From reading [another meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593), I have seen at least one person explicitly", "(\"I don't have experience with this, but clearly ...\") > > > as", "not want answers from people who are not part of the scientific community?", "conjectures being solved, impossible machines being invented and generally major advances in a", "typically upvote and > > * Answers that seem to fall into the", "I have no experience with Academia, so I might be able to provide", "them and have acquired a small amount of rep from a couple of", "per answer. However, I'm not a scientist, student, professor, teacher, researcher or university", "as something they typically downvote, with this answer getting over a dozen upvotes.", "find interesting. I sometimes answer them and have acquired a small amount of", "list of questions in the right sidebar) that I find interesting. I sometimes", "for someone who is active in Academia. On the other hand, I have", "notable cases in the past, such perspectives has led to stuff like unsolvable", "opinion\" category (\"I don't have experience with this, but clearly ...\") > >", "person explicitly mention > > * A user that, based on her/his bio", "this stack in the Hot Network Questions list (the network-wide list of questions", "answer the question > > > as something they typically upvote and >", "questions in the right sidebar) that I find interesting. I sometimes answer them", "answer getting over a dozen upvotes. Does this mean that this community does", "from someone with a minimum of preconceptions. In some notable cases in the", "getting over a dozen upvotes. Does this mean that this community does not", "professor, teacher, researcher or university staffer. It has been about 7 years since", "preconceptions. In some notable cases in the past, such perspectives has led to", "hand, I have no experience with Academia, so I might be able to", "a school in the capacity of a student. Because of this, I'm not", "experience with Academia, so I might be able to provide a unique perspective", "teacher, researcher or university staffer. It has been about 7 years since I", "some notable cases in the past, such perspectives has led to stuff like", "number of scientific fields. From reading [another meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593), I have seen at", "one hand, I have no experience with academia, so I don't know any", "right sidebar) that I find interesting. I sometimes answer them and have acquired", "in Academia. On the other hand, I have no experience with Academia, so", "upvotes per answer. However, I'm not a scientist, student, professor, teacher, researcher or", "be completely inappropriate for someone who is active in Academia. On the other", "other hand, I have no experience with Academia, so I might be able", "does not want answers from people who are not part of the scientific", "this mean that this community does not want answers from people who are", "cases in the past, such perspectives has led to stuff like unsolvable conjectures", "since I last was in a school in the capacity of a student.", "of preconceptions. In some notable cases in the past, such perspectives has led", "don't know any of the established procedures and rules from Academia. What I", "and SE habitus, seems trustworthy to answer the question > > > as", "seems trustworthy to answer the question > > > as something they typically", "> > > as something they typically downvote, with this answer getting over", "the right sidebar) that I find interesting. I sometimes answer them and have", "years since I last was in a school in the capacity of a", "with Academia, so I might be able to provide a unique perspective from", "trustworthy to answer the question > > > as something they typically upvote", "unsolvable conjectures being solved, impossible machines being invented and generally major advances in", "(the network-wide list of questions in the right sidebar) that I find interesting.", "no experience with academia, so I don't know any of the established procedures", "to provide a unique perspective from someone with a minimum of preconceptions. In", "> as something they typically downvote, with this answer getting over a dozen", "have no experience with Academia, so I might be able to provide a", "explicitly mention > > * A user that, based on her/his bio and", "the established procedures and rules from Academia. What I suggest might be completely", "habitus, seems trustworthy to answer the question > > > as something they", "mean that this community does not want answers from people who are not", "researcher or university staffer. It has been about 7 years since I last", "> as something they typically upvote and > > * Answers that seem", "this, but clearly ...\") > > > as something they typically downvote, with", "being invented and generally major advances in a number of scientific fields. From", "Answers that seem to fall into the \"uninformed opinion\" category (\"I don't have", "invented and generally major advances in a number of scientific fields. From reading", "over a dozen upvotes. Does this mean that this community does not want", "academia, so I don't know any of the established procedures and rules from", "I don't know any of the established procedures and rules from Academia. What", "I might be able to provide a unique perspective from someone with a", "amount of rep from a couple of upvotes per answer. However, I'm not", "a couple of upvotes per answer. However, I'm not a scientist, student, professor,", "wholly appropriate for me to answer these questions. On one hand, I have", "inappropriate for someone who is active in Academia. On the other hand, I", "minimum of preconceptions. In some notable cases in the past, such perspectives has", "> > > as something they typically upvote and > > * Answers", "...\") > > > as something they typically downvote, with this answer getting", "advances in a number of scientific fields. From reading [another meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593), I", "I frequently see questions from this stack in the Hot Network Questions list", "A user that, based on her/his bio and SE habitus, seems trustworthy to", "know any of the established procedures and rules from Academia. What I suggest", "sometimes answer them and have acquired a small amount of rep from a", "I'm not sure whether it's wholly appropriate for me to answer these questions.", "with this answer getting over a dozen upvotes. Does this mean that this", "in the Hot Network Questions list (the network-wide list of questions in the", "hand, I have no experience with academia, so I don't know any of", "upvote and > > * Answers that seem to fall into the \"uninformed", "no experience with Academia, so I might be able to provide a unique", "not a scientist, student, professor, teacher, researcher or university staffer. It has been", "sure whether it's wholly appropriate for me to answer these questions. On one", "On one hand, I have no experience with academia, so I don't know", "based on her/his bio and SE habitus, seems trustworthy to answer the question", "that I find interesting. I sometimes answer them and have acquired a small", "active in Academia. On the other hand, I have no experience with Academia,", "have experience with this, but clearly ...\") > > > as something they", "and have acquired a small amount of rep from a couple of upvotes", "answer. However, I'm not a scientist, student, professor, teacher, researcher or university staffer.", "a small amount of rep from a couple of upvotes per answer. However,", "and rules from Academia. What I suggest might be completely inappropriate for someone", "meta answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1545/11593), I have seen at least one person explicitly mention > >", "network-wide list of questions in the right sidebar) that I find interesting. I", "with this, but clearly ...\") > > > as something they typically downvote,", "On the other hand, I have no experience with Academia, so I might", "as something they typically upvote and > > * Answers that seem to", "> > as something they typically downvote, with this answer getting over a", "stack in the Hot Network Questions list (the network-wide list of questions in", "answer these questions. On one hand, I have no experience with academia, so", "the other hand, I have no experience with Academia, so I might be", "a dozen upvotes. Does this mean that this community does not want answers", "acquired a small amount of rep from a couple of upvotes per answer.", "established procedures and rules from Academia. What I suggest might be completely inappropriate", "questions. On one hand, I have no experience with academia, so I don't", "It has been about 7 years since I last was in a school", "I'm not a scientist, student, professor, teacher, researcher or university staffer. It has" ]
[ "get rid of it, I had to click on it which involved giving", "of it, I had to click on it which involved giving it access", "should go or at least be presented in a more informed way, with", "Academia.SE but it didn't show up in MathOverflow. To get rid of it,", "go or at least be presented in a more informed way, with opt-in,", "which involved giving it access to the microphone. How do I know this", "How do I know this website has relinquished this access after I dismissed", "to click on it which involved giving it access to the microphone. How", "it, I had to click on it which involved giving it access to", "it access to the microphone. How do I know this website has relinquished", "MathOverflow. To get rid of it, I had to click on it which", "rid of it, I had to click on it which involved giving it", "on it which involved giving it access to the microphone. How do I", "it didn't show up in MathOverflow. To get rid of it, I had", "dismissed the duck? I think the duck should go or at least be", "this access after I dismissed the duck? I think the duck should go", "didn't show up in MathOverflow. To get rid of it, I had to", "I think the duck should go or at least be presented in a", "how unique it is to Academia.SE but it didn't show up in MathOverflow.", "has relinquished this access after I dismissed the duck? I think the duck", "at least be presented in a more informed way, with opt-in, not opt-out.", "after I dismissed the duck? I think the duck should go or at", "the duck? I think the duck should go or at least be presented", "Not sure how unique it is to Academia.SE but it didn't show up", "click on it which involved giving it access to the microphone. How do", "I dismissed the duck? I think the duck should go or at least", "involved giving it access to the microphone. How do I know this website", "the duck should go or at least be presented in a more informed", "up in MathOverflow. To get rid of it, I had to click on", "access to the microphone. How do I know this website has relinquished this", "show up in MathOverflow. To get rid of it, I had to click", "unique it is to Academia.SE but it didn't show up in MathOverflow. To", "the microphone. How do I know this website has relinquished this access after", "it which involved giving it access to the microphone. How do I know", "relinquished this access after I dismissed the duck? I think the duck should", "duck? I think the duck should go or at least be presented in", "To get rid of it, I had to click on it which involved", "had to click on it which involved giving it access to the microphone.", "sure how unique it is to Academia.SE but it didn't show up in", "in MathOverflow. To get rid of it, I had to click on it", "microphone. How do I know this website has relinquished this access after I", "to Academia.SE but it didn't show up in MathOverflow. To get rid of", "I know this website has relinquished this access after I dismissed the duck?", "access after I dismissed the duck? I think the duck should go or", "duck should go or at least be presented in a more informed way,", "know this website has relinquished this access after I dismissed the duck? I", "to the microphone. How do I know this website has relinquished this access", "or at least be presented in a more informed way, with opt-in, not", "but it didn't show up in MathOverflow. To get rid of it, I", "I had to click on it which involved giving it access to the", "giving it access to the microphone. How do I know this website has", "website has relinquished this access after I dismissed the duck? I think the", "think the duck should go or at least be presented in a more", "is to Academia.SE but it didn't show up in MathOverflow. To get rid", "it is to Academia.SE but it didn't show up in MathOverflow. To get", "do I know this website has relinquished this access after I dismissed the", "this website has relinquished this access after I dismissed the duck? I think" ]
[ "to use, etc., and this is a good attempt to help, but it", "experiences who need assistance with basic communication skills. In such cases, we can", "a good attempt to help, but it has the side-effect of reinforcing the", "on academia.SE where the OP has some basic inquiry to make and is", "the side-effect of reinforcing the view that some special advice is needed to", "university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1) * [how can I ask a professor about funding for master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master) ", "questions about how to undertake basic human communication. Pretty much every question of", "these questions are already marked as duplicates of that general question, and this", "students, etc., have when they want to communicate with academics. The implicit premise", "mark-as-duplicate all questions of this kind. I suspect that many of these questions", "sending them an email. Answers often give some help with forms of words", "every question of this kind is answered by [this general question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1), but most", "basic one involving normal administrative matters, with no special issue that makes it", "questions of this kind. I suspect that many of these questions come out", "[How should I phrase an important question that I need to ask a", "to talk to or email the contact person, usually a professor. Often the", "program at his university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1) [how can I ask a professor about funding", "duplicates of that general question, and this is desirable. In my humble opinion,", "academics. The implicit premise in these questions seems to be that professors are", "most of them strike me as so trivial that the simple answer to", "OP has some basic inquiry to make and is seeking advice about how", "I find them rather annoying, since they lack any real substantive content on", "side-effect of reinforcing the view that some special advice is needed to speak", "of words to use, etc., and this is a good attempt to help,", "of them strike me as so trivial that the simple answer to all", "important question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1) Follow-up: Two answers have", "answered by [this general question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1), but most of them strike me as so", "basic on other SE forums. I find them rather annoying, since they lack", "rude to tell my professor about my other admissions? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1) * [Phone contact", "premise in these questions seems to be that professors are some kind of", "the OP has some basic inquiry to make and is seeking advice about", "a professor I met briefly about collaborative work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work) * [How to tell a", "etiquette before speaking in their presence or sending them an email. Answers often", "different cultural experiences who need assistance with basic communication skills. In such cases,", "is essentially just asking about basic human communication. If not considered off-topic, are", "substantive content on academic matters, and instead ask trivial questions about how to", "human communication with a professor. I have seen many many question on academia.SE", "They strike me as having minimal to no academic content, and the OP", "answer to all these questions is: you tell/ask them that thing you want", "status [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1) [How to thank a potential supervisor's email? [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1) * [Is", "an academic. My question: Are questions of this form off-topic? They strike me", "I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1) Follow-up: Two answers have raised the possibility", "academic matters, and instead ask trivial questions about how to undertake basic human", "about how to undertake basic human communication. Pretty much every question of this", "me as so trivial that the simple answer to all these questions is:", "this basic on other SE forums. I find them rather annoying, since they", "email. Answers often give some help with forms of words to use, etc.,", "content on academic matters, and instead ask trivial questions about how to undertake", "when they want to communicate with academics. The implicit premise in these questions", "the OP seeks advice on basic human communication with a professor. I have", "application status [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1) * [How to thank a potential supervisor's email? [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1) ", "how to talk to or email the contact person, usually a professor. Often", "this, but here are a few of them: [How to effectively e-mail", "to tell my professor about my other admissions? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1) * [Phone contact after", "have raised the possibility that questions of this sort might come from questioners", "the enquiry is a basic one involving normal administrative matters, with no special", "enquiry is a basic one involving normal administrative matters, with no special issue", "* [Politely ask a professor about my application status [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1) * [How to", "often give some help with forms of words to use, etc., and this", "is seeking advice about how to talk to or email the contact person,", "communication. If not considered off-topic, are they merely trivial duplicates of [How should", "before speaking in their presence or sending them an email. Answers often give", "have when they want to communicate with academics. The implicit premise in these", "I met briefly about collaborative work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work) * [How to tell a Prof you", "of reinforcing the view that some special advice is needed to speak to", "a PhD program at his university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1) * [how can I ask a professor", "would be required. There are many examples of this, but here are a", "few of them: * [How to effectively e-mail a professor I met briefly", "to no academic content, and the OP is essentially just asking about basic", "professor about my application status [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1) * [How to thank a potential supervisor's", "suspect that many of these questions come out of a sense of nervousness", "The implicit premise in these questions seems to be that professors are some", "makes it especially difficult or arduous, and it is unclear why any special", "no longer applying to a PhD program at his university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1) * [how can", "is desirable. In my humble opinion, it would be a good idea to", "to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1) Follow-up: Two answers have raised the possibility that questions", "have not seen questions this basic on other SE forums. I find them", "special advice is needed to speak to an academic. My question: Are questions", "are some kind of sanctified emperors and you need to seek detailed advice", "help with forms of words to use, etc., and this is a good", "class of questions where the OP seeks advice on basic human communication with", "phrase an important question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1) Follow-up: Two", "have seen many many question on academia.SE where the OP has some basic", "questions this basic on other SE forums. I find them rather annoying, since", "communicate with academics. The implicit premise in these questions seems to be that", "want to communicate with academics. The implicit premise in these questions seems to", "question on academia.SE where the OP has some basic inquiry to make and", "simple answer to all these questions is: you tell/ask them that thing you", "this kind is answered by [this general question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1), but most of them strike", "academic. My question:* Are questions of this form off-topic? They strike me as", "my professor about my other admissions? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1) * [Phone contact after no response", "they want to communicate with academics. The implicit premise in these questions seems", "their presence or sending them an email. Answers often give some help with", "of them: * [How to effectively e-mail a professor I met briefly about", "that professors are some kind of sanctified emperors and you need to seek", "form off-topic? They strike me as having minimal to no academic content, and", "content, and the OP is essentially just asking about basic human communication. If", "would be a good idea to either close or mark-as-duplicate all questions of", "annoying, since they lack any real substantive content on academic matters, and instead", "tell a Prof you are no longer applying to a PhD program at", "undertake basic human communication. Pretty much every question of this kind is answered", "why any special advice would be required. There are many examples of this,", "but here are a few of them: * [How to effectively e-mail a", "and the OP is essentially just asking about basic human communication. If not", "and instead ask trivial questions about how to undertake basic human communication. Pretty", "briefly about collaborative work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work) * [How to tell a Prof you are no", "merely trivial duplicates of [How should I phrase an important question that I", "come out of a sense of nervousness that students, etc., have when they", "all questions of this kind. I suspect that many of these questions come", "off-topic? They strike me as having minimal to no academic content, and the", "about basic human communication. If not considered off-topic, are they merely trivial duplicates", "to seek detailed advice on etiquette before speaking in their presence or sending", "collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator) I have not seen questions this basic on other SE forums. I", "cultural experiences who need assistance with basic communication skills. In such cases, we", "with basic communication skills. In such cases, we can also refer questions to", "want to tell/ask them. Some of these questions are already marked as duplicates", "is a good attempt to help, but it has the side-effect of reinforcing", "Answers often give some help with forms of words to use, etc., and", "e-mail a professor I met briefly about collaborative work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work) [How to tell", "involving normal administrative matters, with no special issue that makes it especially difficult", "kind of sanctified emperors and you need to seek detailed advice on etiquette", "bit to stress its point, but it concerns a class of questions where", "ask a professor about funding for master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master) * [Politely ask a professor about", "[closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1) * [Phone contact after no response from scientific collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator) I have not", "some special advice is needed to speak to an academic. My question: Are", "Pretty much every question of this kind is answered by [this general question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1),", "with a professor. I have seen many many question on academia.SE where the", "I suspect that many of these questions come out of a sense of", "are many examples of this, but here are a few of them: ", "them: [How to effectively e-mail a professor I met briefly about collaborative", "of [How should I phrase an important question that I need to ask", "[duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1) * [How to thank a potential supervisor's email? [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1) * [Is it", "it is unclear why any special advice would be required. There are many", "question of this kind is answered by [this general question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1), but most of", "a professor. Often the enquiry is a basic one involving normal administrative matters,", "or mark-as-duplicate all questions of this kind. I suspect that many of these", "an email. Answers often give some help with forms of words to use,", "seeking advice about how to talk to or email the contact person, usually", "I have not seen questions this basic on other SE forums. I find", "questions is: you tell/ask them that thing you want to tell/ask them. Some", "duplicates of [How should I phrase an important question that I need to", "admissions? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1) * [Phone contact after no response from scientific collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator) I have", "idea to either close or mark-as-duplicate all questions of this kind. I suspect", "you tell/ask them that thing you want to tell/ask them. Some of these", "to either close or mark-as-duplicate all questions of this kind. I suspect that", "presence or sending them an email. Answers often give some help with forms", "speak to an academic. My question: Are questions of this form off-topic? They", "many question on academia.SE where the OP has some basic inquiry to make", "desirable. In my humble opinion, it would be a good idea to either", "are they merely trivial duplicates of [How should I phrase an important question", "human communication. Pretty much every question of this kind is answered by [this", "[Phone contact after no response from scientific collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator) I have not seen questions", "seen questions this basic on other SE forums. I find them rather annoying,", "potential supervisor's email? [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1) * [Is it rude to tell my professor about", "is answered by [this general question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1), but most of them strike me as", "but it concerns a class of questions where the OP seeks advice on", "having minimal to no academic content, and the OP is essentially just asking", "normal administrative matters, with no special issue that makes it especially difficult or", "them. Some of these questions are already marked as duplicates of that general", "to thank a potential supervisor's email? [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1) [Is it rude to tell", "professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1) Follow-up: Two answers have raised the possibility that questions of this sort", "ask a professor about my application status [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1) * [How to thank a", "where the OP seeks advice on basic human communication with a professor. I", "to tell a Prof you are no longer applying to a PhD program", "trivial questions about how to undertake basic human communication. Pretty much every question", "are a few of them: * [How to effectively e-mail a professor I", "any special advice would be required. There are many examples of this, but", "them strike me as so trivial that the simple answer to all these", "close or mark-as-duplicate all questions of this kind. I suspect that many of", "questioners with different cultural experiences who need assistance with basic communication skills. In", "implicit premise in these questions seems to be that professors are some kind", "this kind. I suspect that many of these questions come out of a", "basic human communication with a professor. I have seen many many question on", "the view that some special advice is needed to speak to an academic.", "a class of questions where the OP seeks advice on basic human communication", "some help with forms of words to use, etc., and this is a", "be a good idea to either close or mark-as-duplicate all questions of this", "inquiry to make and is seeking advice about how to talk to or", "to be that professors are some kind of sanctified emperors and you need", "basic human communication. If not considered off-topic, are they merely trivial duplicates of", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1), but most of them strike me as so trivial that the simple", "be required. There are many examples of this, but here are a few", "I ask a professor about funding for master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master) * [Politely ask a professor", "you need to seek detailed advice on etiquette before speaking in their presence", "ask trivial questions about how to undertake basic human communication. Pretty much every", "to stress its point, but it concerns a class of questions where the", "me as having minimal to no academic content, and the OP is essentially", "this form off-topic? They strike me as having minimal to no academic content,", "so trivial that the simple answer to all these questions is: you tell/ask", "reinforcing the view that some special advice is needed to speak to an", "to a PhD program at his university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1) [how can I ask a", "this sort might come from questioners with different cultural experiences who need assistance", "[How to effectively e-mail a professor I met briefly about collaborative work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work) ", "no academic content, and the OP is essentially just asking about basic human", "to tell/ask them. Some of these questions are already marked as duplicates of", "communication. Pretty much every question of this kind is answered by [this general", "a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1) Follow-up: Two answers have raised the possibility that questions of this", "about my other admissions? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1) * [Phone contact after no response from scientific", "raised the possibility that questions of this sort might come from questioners with", "about my application status [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1) * [How to thank a potential supervisor's email?", "and it is unclear why any special advice would be required. There are", "real substantive content on academic matters, and instead ask trivial questions about how", "they lack any real substantive content on academic matters, and instead ask trivial", "in these questions seems to be that professors are some kind of sanctified", "his university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1) * [how can I ask a professor about funding for master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master)", "one involving normal administrative matters, with no special issue that makes it especially", "some basic inquiry to make and is seeking advice about how to talk", "considered off-topic, are they merely trivial duplicates of [How should I phrase an", "detailed advice on etiquette before speaking in their presence or sending them an", "advice about how to talk to or email the contact person, usually a", "other SE forums. I find them rather annoying, since they lack any real", "matters, and instead ask trivial questions about how to undertake basic human communication.", "general question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1), but most of them strike me as so trivial that the", "come from questioners with different cultural experiences who need assistance with basic communication", "as duplicates of that general question, and this is desirable. In my humble", "strike me as so trivial that the simple answer to all these questions", "a bit to stress its point, but it concerns a class of questions", "advice on basic human communication with a professor. I have seen many many", "my application status [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1) * [How to thank a potential supervisor's email? [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1)", "that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1) Follow-up: Two answers have raised the", "it concerns a class of questions where the OP seeks advice on basic", "is unclear why any special advice would be required. There are many examples", "lack any real substantive content on academic matters, and instead ask trivial questions", "some kind of sanctified emperors and you need to seek detailed advice on", "as so trivial that the simple answer to all these questions is: you", "answers have raised the possibility that questions of this sort might come from", " [How to tell a Prof you are no longer applying to a", "applying to a PhD program at his university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1) * [how can I ask", "marked as duplicates of that general question, and this is desirable. In my", "any real substantive content on academic matters, and instead ask trivial questions about", "to help, but it has the side-effect of reinforcing the view that some", "thank a potential supervisor's email? [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1) * [Is it rude to tell my", "from questioners with different cultural experiences who need assistance with basic communication skills.", "since they lack any real substantive content on academic matters, and instead ask", "much every question of this kind is answered by [this general question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1), but", "OP is essentially just asking about basic human communication. If not considered off-topic,", "of this kind. I suspect that many of these questions come out of", "rather annoying, since they lack any real substantive content on academic matters, and", "of these questions come out of a sense of nervousness that students, etc.,", "need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1) Follow-up: Two answers have raised the possibility that", "seek detailed advice on etiquette before speaking in their presence or sending them", "essentially just asking about basic human communication. If not considered off-topic, are they", "and is seeking advice about how to talk to or email the contact", "words to use, etc., and this is a good attempt to help, but", "that thing you want to tell/ask them. Some of these questions are already", "supervisor's email? [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1) [Is it rude to tell my professor about my", "to an academic. My question: Are questions of this form off-topic? They strike", "to undertake basic human communication. Pretty much every question of this kind is", "usually a professor. Often the enquiry is a basic one involving normal administrative", "thing you want to tell/ask them. Some of these questions are already marked", "speaking in their presence or sending them an email. Answers often give some", "many many question on academia.SE where the OP has some basic inquiry to", "minimal to no academic content, and the OP is essentially just asking about", "with different cultural experiences who need assistance with basic communication skills. In such", "these questions seems to be that professors are some kind of sanctified emperors", "as having minimal to no academic content, and the OP is essentially just", "assistance with basic communication skills. In such cases, we can also refer questions", "them that thing you want to tell/ask them. Some of these questions are", "that makes it especially difficult or arduous, and it is unclear why any", "OP seeks advice on basic human communication with a professor. I have seen", "professor I met briefly about collaborative work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work) * [How to tell a Prof", "use, etc., and this is a good attempt to help, but it has", "and this is a good attempt to help, but it has the side-effect", "Two answers have raised the possibility that questions of this sort might come", "a potential supervisor's email? [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1) * [Is it rude to tell my professor", "unclear why any special advice would be required. There are many examples of", "exaggerates a bit to stress its point, but it concerns a class of", "has some basic inquiry to make and is seeking advice about how to", "to all these questions is: you tell/ask them that thing you want to", "question, and this is desirable. In my humble opinion, it would be a", "professor. I have seen many many question on academia.SE where the OP has", "already marked as duplicates of that general question, and this is desirable. In", "that students, etc., have when they want to communicate with academics. The implicit", "seems to be that professors are some kind of sanctified emperors and you", "[Is it rude to tell my professor about my other admissions? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1) ", "forms of words to use, etc., and this is a good attempt to", "of a sense of nervousness that students, etc., have when they want to", "a professor. I have seen many many question on academia.SE where the OP", "a good idea to either close or mark-as-duplicate all questions of this kind.", "kind. I suspect that many of these questions come out of a sense", "of nervousness that students, etc., have when they want to communicate with academics.", "I have seen many many question on academia.SE where the OP has some", "email the contact person, usually a professor. Often the enquiry is a basic", "these questions is: you tell/ask them that thing you want to tell/ask them.", "special advice would be required. There are many examples of this, but here", "In my humble opinion, it would be a good idea to either close", "academic content, and the OP is essentially just asking about basic human communication.", "a few of them: * [How to effectively e-mail a professor I met", "met briefly about collaborative work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work) * [How to tell a Prof you are", "them an email. Answers often give some help with forms of words to", "no response from scientific collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator) I have not seen questions this basic on", "by [this general question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1), but most of them strike me as so trivial", "advice on etiquette before speaking in their presence or sending them an email.", "be that professors are some kind of sanctified emperors and you need to", "contact after no response from scientific collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator) I have not seen questions this", "good attempt to help, but it has the side-effect of reinforcing the view", "humble opinion, it would be a good idea to either close or mark-as-duplicate", "is a basic one involving normal administrative matters, with no special issue that", "questions of this form off-topic? They strike me as having minimal to no", "longer applying to a PhD program at his university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1) * [how can I", "academia.SE where the OP has some basic inquiry to make and is seeking", "professor. Often the enquiry is a basic one involving normal administrative matters, with", "examples of this, but here are a few of them: * [How to", "has the side-effect of reinforcing the view that some special advice is needed", "stress its point, but it concerns a class of questions where the OP", "professor about my other admissions? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1) * [Phone contact after no response from", "* [Is it rude to tell my professor about my other admissions? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1)", "[how can I ask a professor about funding for master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master) * [Politely ask", "about funding for master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master) * [Politely ask a professor about my application status", "tell/ask them. Some of these questions are already marked as duplicates of that", "to communicate with academics. The implicit premise in these questions seems to be", "seen many many question on academia.SE where the OP has some basic inquiry", "sort might come from questioners with different cultural experiences who need assistance with", "special issue that makes it especially difficult or arduous, and it is unclear", "a Prof you are no longer applying to a PhD program at his", "questions are already marked as duplicates of that general question, and this is", "sense of nervousness that students, etc., have when they want to communicate with", "many examples of this, but here are a few of them: [How", "of questions where the OP seeks advice on basic human communication with a", "I phrase an important question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1) Follow-up:", "sanctified emperors and you need to seek detailed advice on etiquette before speaking", "no special issue that makes it especially difficult or arduous, and it is", "but most of them strike me as so trivial that the simple answer", "required. There are many examples of this, but here are a few of", "SE forums. I find them rather annoying, since they lack any real substantive", "it would be a good idea to either close or mark-as-duplicate all questions", "find them rather annoying, since they lack any real substantive content on academic", "Prof you are no longer applying to a PhD program at his university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1)", "of my question exaggerates a bit to stress its point, but it concerns", "[this general question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1), but most of them strike me as so trivial that", "questions come out of a sense of nervousness that students, etc., have when", "etc., and this is a good attempt to help, but it has the", "the simple answer to all these questions is: you tell/ask them that thing", "general question, and this is desirable. In my humble opinion, it would be", "effectively e-mail a professor I met briefly about collaborative work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work) [How to", "attempt to help, but it has the side-effect of reinforcing the view that", "trivial that the simple answer to all these questions is: you tell/ask them", "professors are some kind of sanctified emperors and you need to seek detailed", "for master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master) [Politely ask a professor about my application status [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1) ", "that some special advice is needed to speak to an academic. My question:", "especially difficult or arduous, and it is unclear why any special advice would", "where the OP has some basic inquiry to make and is seeking advice", "the possibility that questions of this sort might come from questioners with different", "possibility that questions of this sort might come from questioners with different cultural", "advice would be required. There are many examples of this, but here are", "email? [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1) [Is it rude to tell my professor about my other", "on etiquette before speaking in their presence or sending them an email. Answers", "my question exaggerates a bit to stress its point, but it concerns a", "or arduous, and it is unclear why any special advice would be required.", "emperors and you need to seek detailed advice on etiquette before speaking in", "response from scientific collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator) I have not seen questions this basic on other", "[duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1) * [Is it rude to tell my professor about my other admissions?", "title of my question exaggerates a bit to stress its point, but it", "other admissions? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1) * [Phone contact after no response from scientific collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator) I", "either close or mark-as-duplicate all questions of this kind. I suspect that many", "tell my professor about my other admissions? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1) * [Phone contact after no", "with academics. The implicit premise in these questions seems to be that professors", "them rather annoying, since they lack any real substantive content on academic matters,", "a professor about my application status [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1) * [How to thank a potential", "basic communication skills. In such cases, we can also refer questions to [InterpersonalSkills.SE](https://interpersonal.stackexchange.com/).", "question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1) Follow-up: Two answers have raised", "concerns a class of questions where the OP seeks advice on basic human", "not considered off-topic, are they merely trivial duplicates of [How should I phrase", "this is desirable. In my humble opinion, it would be a good idea", "many of these questions come out of a sense of nervousness that students,", "or email the contact person, usually a professor. Often the enquiry is a", "need to seek detailed advice on etiquette before speaking in their presence or", "of sanctified emperors and you need to seek detailed advice on etiquette before", "of that general question, and this is desirable. In my humble opinion, it", "an important question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1) Follow-up: Two answers", "good idea to either close or mark-as-duplicate all questions of this kind. I", "point, but it concerns a class of questions where the OP seeks advice", "* [how can I ask a professor about funding for master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master) * [Politely", "* [How to thank a potential supervisor's email? [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1) * [Is it rude", "person, usually a professor. Often the enquiry is a basic one involving normal", "the OP is essentially just asking about basic human communication. If not considered", "my humble opinion, it would be a good idea to either close or", "strike me as having minimal to no academic content, and the OP is", "professor about funding for master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master) * [Politely ask a professor about my application", "it especially difficult or arduous, and it is unclear why any special advice", "master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master) * [Politely ask a professor about my application status [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1) * [How", "give some help with forms of words to use, etc., and this is", "ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1) Follow-up: Two answers have raised the possibility that questions of", "kind is answered by [this general question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1), but most of them strike me", "that many of these questions come out of a sense of nervousness that", "its point, but it concerns a class of questions where the OP seeks", "are no longer applying to a PhD program at his university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1) * [how", "of this, but here are a few of them: * [How to effectively", "of these questions are already marked as duplicates of that general question, and", "from scientific collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator) I have not seen questions this basic on other SE", "arduous, and it is unclear why any special advice would be required. There", "on other SE forums. I find them rather annoying, since they lack any", "that questions of this sort might come from questioners with different cultural experiences", "but it has the side-effect of reinforcing the view that some special advice", "forums. I find them rather annoying, since they lack any real substantive content", "instead ask trivial questions about how to undertake basic human communication. Pretty much", "If not considered off-topic, are they merely trivial duplicates of [How should I", "trivial duplicates of [How should I phrase an important question that I need", "basic human communication. Pretty much every question of this kind is answered by", "There are many examples of this, but here are a few of them:", "view that some special advice is needed to speak to an academic. *My", "PhD program at his university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1) [how can I ask a professor about", "with no special issue that makes it especially difficult or arduous, and it", "tell/ask them that thing you want to tell/ask them. Some of these questions", "needed to speak to an academic. My question:* Are questions of this form", "issue that makes it especially difficult or arduous, and it is unclear why", "in their presence or sending them an email. Answers often give some help", "this is a good attempt to help, but it has the side-effect of", "who need assistance with basic communication skills. In such cases, we can also", "of this sort might come from questioners with different cultural experiences who need", "[How to thank a potential supervisor's email? [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100829/how-to-thank-a-potential-supervisors-email?noredirect=1&lq=1) * [Is it rude to", "a sense of nervousness that students, etc., have when they want to communicate", "question: Are questions of this form off-topic? They strike me as having minimal", "The title of my question exaggerates a bit to stress its point, but", "contact person, usually a professor. Often the enquiry is a basic one involving", "matters, with no special issue that makes it especially difficult or arduous, and", "asking about basic human communication. If not considered off-topic, are they merely trivial", "opinion, it would be a good idea to either close or mark-as-duplicate all", "talk to or email the contact person, usually a professor. Often the enquiry", "just asking about basic human communication. If not considered off-topic, are they merely", "the contact person, usually a professor. Often the enquiry is a basic one", "to or email the contact person, usually a professor. Often the enquiry is", "after no response from scientific collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator) I have not seen questions this basic", "is needed to speak to an academic. My question:** Are questions of this", "all these questions is: you tell/ask them that thing you want to tell/ask", "a professor about funding for master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master) [Politely ask a professor about my", "my other admissions? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1) * [Phone contact after no response from scientific collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator)", "make and is seeking advice about how to talk to or email the", "and you need to seek detailed advice on etiquette before speaking in their", "you want to tell/ask them. Some of these questions are already marked as", "of this form off-topic? They strike me as having minimal to no academic", "on academic matters, and instead ask trivial questions about how to undertake basic", "need assistance with basic communication skills. In such cases, we can also refer", "is: you tell/ask them that thing you want to tell/ask them. Some of", "or sending them an email. Answers often give some help with forms of", "question exaggerates a bit to stress its point, but it concerns a class", "you are no longer applying to a PhD program at his university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1) ", "it rude to tell my professor about my other admissions? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90483/is-it-rude-to-tell-my-professor-about-my-other-admissions?rq=1) * [Phone", "on basic human communication with a professor. I have seen many many question", "to make and is seeking advice about how to talk to or email", "communication with a professor. I have seen many many question on academia.SE where", "etc., have when they want to communicate with academics. The implicit premise in", "help, but it has the side-effect of reinforcing the view that some special", "difficult or arduous, and it is unclear why any special advice would be", "and this is desirable. In my humble opinion, it would be a good", "they merely trivial duplicates of [How should I phrase an important question that", "seeks advice on basic human communication with a professor. I have seen many", "questions of this sort might come from questioners with different cultural experiences who", "Follow-up: Two answers have raised the possibility that questions of this sort might", "how to undertake basic human communication. Pretty much every question of this kind", "[Politely ask a professor about my application status [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1) * [How to thank", "Often the enquiry is a basic one involving normal administrative matters, with no", "advice is needed to speak to an academic. My question: Are questions of", "* [Phone contact after no response from scientific collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator) I have not seen", "that general question, and this is desirable. In my humble opinion, it would", "can I ask a professor about funding for master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master) * [Politely ask a", "not seen questions this basic on other SE forums. I find them rather", "Are questions of this form off-topic? They strike me as having minimal to", "about collaborative work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work) * [How to tell a Prof you are no longer", "My question: Are questions of this form off-topic? They strike me as having", "a basic one involving normal administrative matters, with no special issue that makes", "off-topic, are they merely trivial duplicates of [How should I phrase an important", "it has the side-effect of reinforcing the view that some special advice is", "nervousness that students, etc., have when they want to communicate with academics. The", "Some of these questions are already marked as duplicates of that general question,", "questions seems to be that professors are some kind of sanctified emperors and", "collaborative work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work) * [How to tell a Prof you are no longer applying", "are already marked as duplicates of that general question, and this is desirable.", "to effectively e-mail a professor I met briefly about collaborative work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work) * [How", "at his university?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99183/how-to-tell-a-prof-you-are-no-longer-applying-to-a-phd-program-at-his-university?rq=1) * [how can I ask a professor about funding for", "here are a few of them: * [How to effectively e-mail a professor", "work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work) * [How to tell a Prof you are no longer applying to", "of this kind is answered by [this general question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1), but most of them", "these questions come out of a sense of nervousness that students, etc., have", "to speak to an academic. My question: Are questions of this form off-topic?", "should I phrase an important question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor?noredirect=1&lq=1)", "with forms of words to use, etc., and this is a good attempt", "questions where the OP seeks advice on basic human communication with a professor.", "human communication. If not considered off-topic, are they merely trivial duplicates of [How", "funding for master!](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90136/how-can-i-ask-a-professor-about-funding-for-master) * [Politely ask a professor about my application status [duplicate]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/86303/politely-ask-a-professor-about-my-application-status?rq=1)", "* [How to effectively e-mail a professor I met briefly about collaborative work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/108710/how-to-effectively-e-mail-a-professor-i-met-briefly-about-collaborative-work)", "basic inquiry to make and is seeking advice about how to talk to", "about how to talk to or email the contact person, usually a professor.", "might come from questioners with different cultural experiences who need assistance with basic", "administrative matters, with no special issue that makes it especially difficult or arduous,", "that the simple answer to all these questions is: *you tell/ask them that", "out of a sense of nervousness that students, etc., have when they want", "scientific collaborator?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62814/phone-contact-after-no-response-from-scientific-collaborator) I have not seen questions this basic on other SE forums.", "[How to tell a Prof you are no longer applying to a PhD" ]
[ "questions) in reddit or in other sites. Sites related to academy (like <https://academia.stackexchange.com/>,", "on Indian academia (career, education, research education questions) in reddit or in other", "source for local data on the indian academy. Here is the link to", "non-local. This new subreddit for indian academia, might allow having source for local", "and non-local. This new subreddit for indian academia, might allow having source for", "general, and non-local. This new subreddit for indian academia, might allow having source", "other sites. Sites related to academy (like <https://academia.stackexchange.com/>, i.e. this one) seem to", "new subreddit for indian academia, might allow having source for local data on", "haven't found a subreddit with dense source of data on Indian academia (career,", "a subreddit with dense source of data on Indian academia (career, education, research", "Sites related to academy (like <https://academia.stackexchange.com/>, i.e. this one) seem to be more", "subreddit for indian academia, might allow having source for local data on the", "or in other sites. Sites related to academy (like <https://academia.stackexchange.com/>, i.e. this one)", "This new subreddit for indian academia, might allow having source for local data", "research education questions) in reddit or in other sites. Sites related to academy", "more general, and non-local. This new subreddit for indian academia, might allow having", "academia, might allow having source for local data on the indian academy. Here", "education questions) in reddit or in other sites. Sites related to academy (like", "I haven't found a subreddit with dense source of data on Indian academia", "Indian academia (career, education, research education questions) in reddit or in other sites.", "education, research education questions) in reddit or in other sites. Sites related to", "seem to be more general, and non-local. This new subreddit for indian academia,", "with dense source of data on Indian academia (career, education, research education questions)", "academia (career, education, research education questions) in reddit or in other sites. Sites", "found a subreddit with dense source of data on Indian academia (career, education,", "might allow having source for local data on the indian academy. Here is", "academy (like <https://academia.stackexchange.com/>, i.e. this one) seem to be more general, and non-local.", "data on Indian academia (career, education, research education questions) in reddit or in", "i.e. this one) seem to be more general, and non-local. This new subreddit", "dense source of data on Indian academia (career, education, research education questions) in", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/>, i.e. this one) seem to be more general, and non-local. This new", "source of data on Indian academia (career, education, research education questions) in reddit", "(career, education, research education questions) in reddit or in other sites. Sites related", "one) seem to be more general, and non-local. This new subreddit for indian", "to academy (like <https://academia.stackexchange.com/>, i.e. this one) seem to be more general, and", "be more general, and non-local. This new subreddit for indian academia, might allow", "(like <https://academia.stackexchange.com/>, i.e. this one) seem to be more general, and non-local. This", "related to academy (like <https://academia.stackexchange.com/>, i.e. this one) seem to be more general,", "this one) seem to be more general, and non-local. This new subreddit for", "to be more general, and non-local. This new subreddit for indian academia, might", "indian academia, might allow having source for local data on the indian academy.", "reddit or in other sites. Sites related to academy (like <https://academia.stackexchange.com/>, i.e. this", "for local data on the indian academy. Here is the link to it:", "in reddit or in other sites. Sites related to academy (like <https://academia.stackexchange.com/>, i.e.", "for indian academia, might allow having source for local data on the indian", "sites. Sites related to academy (like <https://academia.stackexchange.com/>, i.e. this one) seem to be", "having source for local data on the indian academy. Here is the link", "in other sites. Sites related to academy (like <https://academia.stackexchange.com/>, i.e. this one) seem", "local data on the indian academy. Here is the link to it: <https://www.reddit.com/r/Indian_Academia/>", "of data on Indian academia (career, education, research education questions) in reddit or", "allow having source for local data on the indian academy. Here is the", "subreddit with dense source of data on Indian academia (career, education, research education" ]
[ "more welcoming to newcomers, I believe it is worthwhile for us to explore", "job explaining why we have issues with questions that are posted in a", "a way that helps users try to improve their question if possible, or", "questions \"just to be nice.\" However, it does seem appropriate that we do", "we can do to help new visitors ease into the site. While I", "posted in a way that helps users try to improve their question if", "that we do a better job explaining why we have issues with questions", "we have issues with questions that are posted in a way that helps", "do not believe we should relax standards for what is considered an acceptable", "we should relax standards for what is considered an acceptable question, nor should", "of what's wrong. Are there any other suggestions for how we can implement", "repeat questions \"just to be nice.\" However, it does seem appropriate that we", "light of the recent [Stack Overflow post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/?cb=1) on being more welcoming to newcomers,", "visitors ease into the site. While I do not believe we should relax", "do a better job explaining why we have issues with questions that are", "is considered an acceptable question, nor should we answer repeat questions \"just to", "an acceptable question, nor should we answer repeat questions \"just to be nice.\"", "questions that are posted in a way that helps users try to improve", "why we have issues with questions that are posted in a way that", "for what is considered an acceptable question, nor should we answer repeat questions", "the site. While I do not believe we should relax standards for what", "of the recent [Stack Overflow post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/?cb=1) on being more welcoming to newcomers, I", "However, it does seem appropriate that we do a better job explaining why", "explanation of what's wrong. Are there any other suggestions for how we can", "Are there any other suggestions for how we can implement this initiative here", "explaining why we have issues with questions that are posted in a way", "believe we should relax standards for what is considered an acceptable question, nor", "it is worthwhile for us to explore what we can do to help", "appropriate that we do a better job explaining why we have issues with", "I believe it is worthwhile for us to explore what we can do", "to help new visitors ease into the site. While I do not believe", "In light of the recent [Stack Overflow post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/?cb=1) on being more welcoming to", "improve their question if possible, or be a clear explanation of what's wrong.", "that helps users try to improve their question if possible, or be a", "newcomers, I believe it is worthwhile for us to explore what we can", "into the site. While I do not believe we should relax standards for", "what is considered an acceptable question, nor should we answer repeat questions \"just", "to explore what we can do to help new visitors ease into the", "does seem appropriate that we do a better job explaining why we have", "are posted in a way that helps users try to improve their question", "any other suggestions for how we can implement this initiative here on Academia.SE?", "believe it is worthwhile for us to explore what we can do to", "issues with questions that are posted in a way that helps users try", "if possible, or be a clear explanation of what's wrong. Are there any", "on being more welcoming to newcomers, I believe it is worthwhile for us", "have issues with questions that are posted in a way that helps users", "clear explanation of what's wrong. Are there any other suggestions for how we", "answer repeat questions \"just to be nice.\" However, it does seem appropriate that", "being more welcoming to newcomers, I believe it is worthwhile for us to", "nice.\" However, it does seem appropriate that we do a better job explaining", "wrong. Are there any other suggestions for how we can implement this initiative", "do to help new visitors ease into the site. While I do not", "help new visitors ease into the site. While I do not believe we", "[Stack Overflow post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/?cb=1) on being more welcoming to newcomers, I believe it is", "I do not believe we should relax standards for what is considered an", "a better job explaining why we have issues with questions that are posted", "what we can do to help new visitors ease into the site. While", "is worthwhile for us to explore what we can do to help new", "it does seem appropriate that we do a better job explaining why we", "seem appropriate that we do a better job explaining why we have issues", "helps users try to improve their question if possible, or be a clear", "welcoming to newcomers, I believe it is worthwhile for us to explore what", "can do to help new visitors ease into the site. While I do", "post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/?cb=1) on being more welcoming to newcomers, I believe it is worthwhile for", "to improve their question if possible, or be a clear explanation of what's", "be a clear explanation of what's wrong. Are there any other suggestions for", "users try to improve their question if possible, or be a clear explanation", "question, nor should we answer repeat questions \"just to be nice.\" However, it", "possible, or be a clear explanation of what's wrong. Are there any other", "While I do not believe we should relax standards for what is considered", "relax standards for what is considered an acceptable question, nor should we answer", "a clear explanation of what's wrong. Are there any other suggestions for how", "us to explore what we can do to help new visitors ease into", "considered an acceptable question, nor should we answer repeat questions \"just to be", "we answer repeat questions \"just to be nice.\" However, it does seem appropriate", "new visitors ease into the site. While I do not believe we should", "recent [Stack Overflow post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/?cb=1) on being more welcoming to newcomers, I believe it", "should we answer repeat questions \"just to be nice.\" However, it does seem", "what's wrong. Are there any other suggestions for how we can implement this", "for us to explore what we can do to help new visitors ease", "nor should we answer repeat questions \"just to be nice.\" However, it does", "site. While I do not believe we should relax standards for what is", "better job explaining why we have issues with questions that are posted in", "to newcomers, I believe it is worthwhile for us to explore what we", "the recent [Stack Overflow post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/?cb=1) on being more welcoming to newcomers, I believe", "worthwhile for us to explore what we can do to help new visitors", "try to improve their question if possible, or be a clear explanation of", "standards for what is considered an acceptable question, nor should we answer repeat", "should relax standards for what is considered an acceptable question, nor should we", "question if possible, or be a clear explanation of what's wrong. Are there", "not believe we should relax standards for what is considered an acceptable question,", "way that helps users try to improve their question if possible, or be", "we do a better job explaining why we have issues with questions that", "explore what we can do to help new visitors ease into the site.", "be nice.\" However, it does seem appropriate that we do a better job", "with questions that are posted in a way that helps users try to", "that are posted in a way that helps users try to improve their", "acceptable question, nor should we answer repeat questions \"just to be nice.\" However,", "their question if possible, or be a clear explanation of what's wrong. Are", "or be a clear explanation of what's wrong. Are there any other suggestions", "in a way that helps users try to improve their question if possible,", "\"just to be nice.\" However, it does seem appropriate that we do a", "to be nice.\" However, it does seem appropriate that we do a better", "Overflow post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/?cb=1) on being more welcoming to newcomers, I believe it is worthwhile", "ease into the site. While I do not believe we should relax standards", "there any other suggestions for how we can implement this initiative here on" ]
[ "@Kimball-Since I have given a correct answer to your question,Please award me a", "a follow-up comment: > > @Kimball-Since I have given a correct answer to", "I was wondering: is this an isolated incident or does it happen with", "no other answer I feel worthy of a bounty why not award it", "happen with some regularity? PS: I am new to bounties, but it appears", "copy-paste from the blog post with a follow-up comment: > > @Kimball-Since I", "actually quite funny, and if there's no other answer I feel worthy of", "I have given a correct answer to your question,Please award me a bounty", "have given a correct answer to your question,Please award me a bounty worth", "click on the username so I presume either the post was created without", "bounty to this deleted answer (the +100 is highlighted when I roll over", "from the blog post with a follow-up comment: > > @Kimball-Since I have", "deleted. Anyway, I don't recall seeing such blatant trolling on this site, but", "the post was created without an actual account and/or the account was promptly", "blog post with a follow-up comment: > > @Kimball-Since I have given a", "recall seeing such blatant trolling on this site, but I was wondering: is", "highlighted when I roll over it). Can I? My second reaction to this", "site, but I was wondering: is this an isolated incident or does it", "mine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/95176/19607) based on a blog post I read, to which I also attached", "> In addition I cannot click on the username so I presume either", "worthy of a bounty why not award it to this just to pile", "correct answer to your question,Please award me a bounty worth +100 reputation within", "I? My second reaction to this post was that it was actually quite", "an isolated incident or does it happen with some regularity? PS: I am", "such blatant trolling on this site, but I was wondering: is this an", "the bounty to this deleted answer (the +100 is highlighted when I roll", "it appears I can actually award the bounty to this deleted answer (the", "actual account and/or the account was promptly deleted. Anyway, I don't recall seeing", "I don't recall seeing such blatant trolling on this site, but I was", "if there's no other answer I feel worthy of a bounty why not", "days from today – user92118 > > > In addition I cannot click", "> > @Kimball-Since I have given a correct answer to your question,Please award", "this deleted answer (the +100 is highlighted when I roll over it). Can", "worth +100 reputation within 5 days from today – user92118 > > >", "I also attached a bounty. The answer in question is just a verbatim", "from today – user92118 > > > In addition I cannot click on", "and/or the account was promptly deleted. Anyway, I don't recall seeing such blatant", "read, to which I also attached a bounty. The answer in question is", "follow-up comment: > > @Kimball-Since I have given a correct answer to your", "In addition I cannot click on the username so I presume either the", "created without an actual account and/or the account was promptly deleted. Anyway, I", "was actually quite funny, and if there's no other answer I feel worthy", "to pile pointlessness on pointlessness (a la the \"I figured 1 big pile", "given a correct answer to your question,Please award me a bounty worth +100", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/108950/19607) to a [question of mine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/95176/19607) based on a blog post I read,", "blatant trolling on this site, but I was wondering: is this an isolated", "appears I can actually award the bounty to this deleted answer (the +100", "account and/or the account was promptly deleted. Anyway, I don't recall seeing such", "with a follow-up comment: > > @Kimball-Since I have given a correct answer", "blog post I read, to which I also attached a bounty. The answer", "answer I feel worthy of a bounty why not award it to this", "trolling on this site, but I was wondering: is this an isolated incident", "but I was wondering: is this an isolated incident or does it happen", "> @Kimball-Since I have given a correct answer to your question,Please award me", "a [deleted answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/108950/19607) to a [question of mine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/95176/19607) based on a blog post", "was that it was actually quite funny, and if there's no other answer", "post with a follow-up comment: > > @Kimball-Since I have given a correct", "was recently a [deleted answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/108950/19607) to a [question of mine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/95176/19607) based on a", "answer (the +100 is highlighted when I roll over it). Can I? My", "feel worthy of a bounty why not award it to this just to", "answer in question is just a verbatim copy-paste from the blog post with", "quite funny, and if there's no other answer I feel worthy of a", "I can actually award the bounty to this deleted answer (the +100 is", "it). Can I? My second reaction to this post was that it was", "I roll over it). Can I? My second reaction to this post was", "I cannot click on the username so I presume either the post was", "to which I also attached a bounty. The answer in question is just", "post I read, to which I also attached a bounty. The answer in", "not award it to this just to pile pointlessness on pointlessness (a la", "1 big pile of garbage was better than 2 smaller piles of garbage\"", "a verbatim copy-paste from the blog post with a follow-up comment: > >", "just to pile pointlessness on pointlessness (a la the \"I figured 1 big", "bounty. The answer in question is just a verbatim copy-paste from the blog", "post was created without an actual account and/or the account was promptly deleted.", "la the \"I figured 1 big pile of garbage was better than 2", "+100 reputation within 5 days from today – user92118 > > > In", "the username so I presume either the post was created without an actual", "incident or does it happen with some regularity? PS: I am new to", "that it was actually quite funny, and if there's no other answer I", "question is just a verbatim copy-paste from the blog post with a follow-up", "this site, but I was wondering: is this an isolated incident or does", "on this site, but I was wondering: is this an isolated incident or", "username so I presume either the post was created without an actual account", "other answer I feel worthy of a bounty why not award it to", "pointlessness on pointlessness (a la the \"I figured 1 big pile of garbage", "just a verbatim copy-paste from the blog post with a follow-up comment: >", "seeing such blatant trolling on this site, but I was wondering: is this", "this an isolated incident or does it happen with some regularity? PS: I", "award me a bounty worth +100 reputation within 5 days from today –", "roll over it). Can I? My second reaction to this post was that", "big pile of garbage was better than 2 smaller piles of garbage\" philosophy).", "promptly deleted. Anyway, I don't recall seeing such blatant trolling on this site,", "award the bounty to this deleted answer (the +100 is highlighted when I", "a bounty. The answer in question is just a verbatim copy-paste from the", "comment: > > @Kimball-Since I have given a correct answer to your question,Please", "why not award it to this just to pile pointlessness on pointlessness (a", "on pointlessness (a la the \"I figured 1 big pile of garbage was", "today – user92118 > > > In addition I cannot click on the", "a bounty worth +100 reputation within 5 days from today – user92118 >", "answer to your question,Please award me a bounty worth +100 reputation within 5", "of a bounty why not award it to this just to pile pointlessness", "of mine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/95176/19607) based on a blog post I read, to which I also", "it to this just to pile pointlessness on pointlessness (a la the \"I", "this just to pile pointlessness on pointlessness (a la the \"I figured 1", "the \"I figured 1 big pile of garbage was better than 2 smaller", "reaction to this post was that it was actually quite funny, and if", "account was promptly deleted. Anyway, I don't recall seeing such blatant trolling on", "the account was promptly deleted. Anyway, I don't recall seeing such blatant trolling", "on a blog post I read, to which I also attached a bounty.", "and if there's no other answer I feel worthy of a bounty why", "5 days from today – user92118 > > > In addition I cannot", "within 5 days from today – user92118 > > > In addition I", "I feel worthy of a bounty why not award it to this just", "to this deleted answer (the +100 is highlighted when I roll over it).", "this post was that it was actually quite funny, and if there's no", "your question,Please award me a bounty worth +100 reputation within 5 days from", "My second reaction to this post was that it was actually quite funny,", "is just a verbatim copy-paste from the blog post with a follow-up comment:", "question,Please award me a bounty worth +100 reputation within 5 days from today", "a correct answer to your question,Please award me a bounty worth +100 reputation", "based on a blog post I read, to which I also attached a", "or does it happen with some regularity? PS: I am new to bounties,", "(a la the \"I figured 1 big pile of garbage was better than", "when I roll over it). Can I? My second reaction to this post", "pointlessness (a la the \"I figured 1 big pile of garbage was better", "isolated incident or does it happen with some regularity? PS: I am new", "but it appears I can actually award the bounty to this deleted answer", "is highlighted when I roll over it). Can I? My second reaction to", "a [question of mine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/95176/19607) based on a blog post I read, to which", "addition I cannot click on the username so I presume either the post", "to this post was that it was actually quite funny, and if there's", "without an actual account and/or the account was promptly deleted. Anyway, I don't", "with some regularity? PS: I am new to bounties, but it appears I", "over it). Can I? My second reaction to this post was that it", "on the username so I presume either the post was created without an", "bounties, but it appears I can actually award the bounty to this deleted", "is this an isolated incident or does it happen with some regularity? PS:", "> > In addition I cannot click on the username so I presume", "some regularity? PS: I am new to bounties, but it appears I can", "recently a [deleted answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/108950/19607) to a [question of mine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/95176/19607) based on a blog", "to this just to pile pointlessness on pointlessness (a la the \"I figured", "was created without an actual account and/or the account was promptly deleted. Anyway,", "it happen with some regularity? PS: I am new to bounties, but it", "second reaction to this post was that it was actually quite funny, and", "reputation within 5 days from today – user92118 > > > In addition", "a bounty why not award it to this just to pile pointlessness on", "award it to this just to pile pointlessness on pointlessness (a la the", "to your question,Please award me a bounty worth +100 reputation within 5 days", "There was recently a [deleted answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/108950/19607) to a [question of mine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/95176/19607) based on", "me a bounty worth +100 reputation within 5 days from today – user92118", "cannot click on the username so I presume either the post was created", "+100 is highlighted when I roll over it). Can I? My second reaction", "(the +100 is highlighted when I roll over it). Can I? My second", "The answer in question is just a verbatim copy-paste from the blog post", "verbatim copy-paste from the blog post with a follow-up comment: > > @Kimball-Since", "\"I figured 1 big pile of garbage was better than 2 smaller piles", "actually award the bounty to this deleted answer (the +100 is highlighted when", "an actual account and/or the account was promptly deleted. Anyway, I don't recall", "the blog post with a follow-up comment: > > @Kimball-Since I have given", "Anyway, I don't recall seeing such blatant trolling on this site, but I", "does it happen with some regularity? PS: I am new to bounties, but", "post was that it was actually quite funny, and if there's no other", "regularity? PS: I am new to bounties, but it appears I can actually", "Can I? My second reaction to this post was that it was actually", "wondering: is this an isolated incident or does it happen with some regularity?", "in question is just a verbatim copy-paste from the blog post with a", "I read, to which I also attached a bounty. The answer in question", "I am new to bounties, but it appears I can actually award the", "a blog post I read, to which I also attached a bounty. The", "either the post was created without an actual account and/or the account was", "to bounties, but it appears I can actually award the bounty to this", "which I also attached a bounty. The answer in question is just a", "bounty worth +100 reputation within 5 days from today – user92118 > >", "deleted answer (the +100 is highlighted when I roll over it). Can I?", "presume either the post was created without an actual account and/or the account", "figured 1 big pile of garbage was better than 2 smaller piles of", "so I presume either the post was created without an actual account and/or", "pile pointlessness on pointlessness (a la the \"I figured 1 big pile of", "attached a bounty. The answer in question is just a verbatim copy-paste from", "was promptly deleted. Anyway, I don't recall seeing such blatant trolling on this", "there's no other answer I feel worthy of a bounty why not award", "was wondering: is this an isolated incident or does it happen with some", "am new to bounties, but it appears I can actually award the bounty", "bounty why not award it to this just to pile pointlessness on pointlessness", "PS: I am new to bounties, but it appears I can actually award", "I presume either the post was created without an actual account and/or the", "user92118 > > > In addition I cannot click on the username so", "can actually award the bounty to this deleted answer (the +100 is highlighted", "> > > In addition I cannot click on the username so I", "[question of mine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/95176/19607) based on a blog post I read, to which I", "also attached a bounty. The answer in question is just a verbatim copy-paste", "to a [question of mine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/95176/19607) based on a blog post I read, to", "don't recall seeing such blatant trolling on this site, but I was wondering:", "[deleted answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/108950/19607) to a [question of mine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/95176/19607) based on a blog post I", "– user92118 > > > In addition I cannot click on the username", "new to bounties, but it appears I can actually award the bounty to", "funny, and if there's no other answer I feel worthy of a bounty", "it was actually quite funny, and if there's no other answer I feel" ]
[ "gender distribution of Academia SE participants? Academia has been male dominated for a", "at Academia SE! Could someone provide some recent stats regarding gender distribution of", "may carry over to our participation levels at Academia SE. What do the", "a long time (in some fields more than others; and although women are", "Academia SE participants? Academia has been male dominated for a long time (in", "and an associated [SE Meta question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826). Food for thought for us at Academia", "more than others; and although women are becoming more and more present as", "SE blog post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/) about promoting diversity and niceness at SE, and an associated", "diversity and niceness at SE, and an associated [SE Meta question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826). Food for", "and it's my impression that that imbalance may carry over to our participation", "dominated for a long time (in some fields more than others; and although", "time goes on), and it's my impression that that imbalance may carry over", "that that imbalance may carry over to our participation levels at Academia SE.", "their gender. But it would be interesting to see what is known about", "it's my impression that that imbalance may carry over to our participation levels", "SE participants? Academia has been male dominated for a long time (in some", "SE. What do the stats say? I realize there are lots of participants", "of participants who have not indicated their gender. But it would be interesting", "male dominated for a long time (in some fields more than others; and", "long time (in some fields more than others; and although women are becoming", "for thought for us at Academia SE! Could someone provide some recent stats", "there are lots of participants who have not indicated their gender. But it", "about promoting diversity and niceness at SE, and an associated [SE Meta question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826).", "a [recent SE blog post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/) about promoting diversity and niceness at SE, and", "at Academia SE. What do the stats say? I realize there are lots", "an associated [SE Meta question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826). Food for thought for us at Academia SE!", "post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/) about promoting diversity and niceness at SE, and an associated [SE Meta", "who have not indicated their gender. But it would be interesting to see", "blog post contains a brief survey questionnaire. I hope Academia SE participants will", "indicated their gender. But it would be interesting to see what is known", "more present as time goes on), and it's my impression that that imbalance", "becoming more and more present as time goes on), and it's my impression", "associated [SE Meta question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826). Food for thought for us at Academia SE! Could", "regarding gender distribution of Academia SE participants? Academia has been male dominated for", "provide some recent stats regarding gender distribution of Academia SE participants? Academia has", "levels at Academia SE. What do the stats say? I realize there are", "recent stats regarding gender distribution of Academia SE participants? Academia has been male", "time (in some fields more than others; and although women are becoming more", "participants? Academia has been male dominated for a long time (in some fields", "stats say? I realize there are lots of participants who have not indicated", "carry over to our participation levels at Academia SE. What do the stats", "be interesting to see what is known about gender distribution here. The blog", "say? I realize there are lots of participants who have not indicated their", "is known about gender distribution here. The blog post contains a brief survey", "lots of participants who have not indicated their gender. But it would be", "to see what is known about gender distribution here. The blog post contains", "my impression that that imbalance may carry over to our participation levels at", "over to our participation levels at Academia SE. What do the stats say?", "contains a brief survey questionnaire. I hope Academia SE participants will take part.", "promoting diversity and niceness at SE, and an associated [SE Meta question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826). Food", "others; and although women are becoming more and more present as time goes", "us at Academia SE! Could someone provide some recent stats regarding gender distribution", "on), and it's my impression that that imbalance may carry over to our", "have not indicated their gender. But it would be interesting to see what", "the stats say? I realize there are lots of participants who have not", "gender distribution here. The blog post contains a brief survey questionnaire. I hope", "I realize there are lots of participants who have not indicated their gender.", "Food for thought for us at Academia SE! Could someone provide some recent", "for us at Academia SE! Could someone provide some recent stats regarding gender", "some recent stats regarding gender distribution of Academia SE participants? Academia has been", "Academia SE! Could someone provide some recent stats regarding gender distribution of Academia", "do the stats say? I realize there are lots of participants who have", "at SE, and an associated [SE Meta question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826). Food for thought for us", "participants who have not indicated their gender. But it would be interesting to", "Academia SE. What do the stats say? I realize there are lots of", "The blog post contains a brief survey questionnaire. I hope Academia SE participants", "SE! Could someone provide some recent stats regarding gender distribution of Academia SE", "Could someone provide some recent stats regarding gender distribution of Academia SE participants?", "although women are becoming more and more present as time goes on), and", "was a [recent SE blog post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/) about promoting diversity and niceness at SE,", "women are becoming more and more present as time goes on), and it's", "imbalance may carry over to our participation levels at Academia SE. What do", "gender. But it would be interesting to see what is known about gender", "about gender distribution here. The blog post contains a brief survey questionnaire. I", "impression that that imbalance may carry over to our participation levels at Academia", "Academia has been male dominated for a long time (in some fields more", "than others; and although women are becoming more and more present as time", "There was a [recent SE blog post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/) about promoting diversity and niceness at", "would be interesting to see what is known about gender distribution here. The", "known about gender distribution here. The blog post contains a brief survey questionnaire.", "it would be interesting to see what is known about gender distribution here.", "are lots of participants who have not indicated their gender. But it would", "stats regarding gender distribution of Academia SE participants? Academia has been male dominated", "some fields more than others; and although women are becoming more and more", "niceness at SE, and an associated [SE Meta question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826). Food for thought for", "But it would be interesting to see what is known about gender distribution", "not indicated their gender. But it would be interesting to see what is", "blog post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/) about promoting diversity and niceness at SE, and an associated [SE", "(in some fields more than others; and although women are becoming more and", "fields more than others; and although women are becoming more and more present", "for a long time (in some fields more than others; and although women", "see what is known about gender distribution here. The blog post contains a", "are becoming more and more present as time goes on), and it's my", "interesting to see what is known about gender distribution here. The blog post", "that imbalance may carry over to our participation levels at Academia SE. What", "thought for us at Academia SE! Could someone provide some recent stats regarding", "here. The blog post contains a brief survey questionnaire. I hope Academia SE", "and more present as time goes on), and it's my impression that that", "has been male dominated for a long time (in some fields more than", "[recent SE blog post](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/04/26/stack-overflow-isnt-very-welcoming-its-time-for-that-to-change/) about promoting diversity and niceness at SE, and an", "and niceness at SE, and an associated [SE Meta question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826). Food for thought", "[SE Meta question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826). Food for thought for us at Academia SE! Could someone", "to our participation levels at Academia SE. What do the stats say? I", "realize there are lots of participants who have not indicated their gender. But", "question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826). Food for thought for us at Academia SE! Could someone provide some", "as time goes on), and it's my impression that that imbalance may carry", "participation levels at Academia SE. What do the stats say? I realize there", "goes on), and it's my impression that that imbalance may carry over to", "present as time goes on), and it's my impression that that imbalance may", "SE, and an associated [SE Meta question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826). Food for thought for us at", "post contains a brief survey questionnaire. I hope Academia SE participants will take", "what is known about gender distribution here. The blog post contains a brief", "been male dominated for a long time (in some fields more than others;", "What do the stats say? I realize there are lots of participants who", "our participation levels at Academia SE. What do the stats say? I realize", "and although women are becoming more and more present as time goes on),", "of Academia SE participants? Academia has been male dominated for a long time", "someone provide some recent stats regarding gender distribution of Academia SE participants? Academia", "distribution of Academia SE participants? Academia has been male dominated for a long", "more and more present as time goes on), and it's my impression that", "distribution here. The blog post contains a brief survey questionnaire. I hope Academia", "Meta question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/309645/287826). Food for thought for us at Academia SE! Could someone provide" ]
[ "is inconsistent, it becomes orders of magnitude more problematic. For these reasons and", "and others, I oppose the use of \"controversial question\" mechanism and I think", "certain moderators. Further to this, I imagine, there were equally controversial statements that", "an ethical point of view, but when this interference is at the discretion", "use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide", "above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice. > > >", "highly controversial statement, and I note that it hasn't been \"removed without notice,\"", "question was marked as a \"controversial post.\" The text says: > > Controversial", "concept morally dubious. To illustrate, here's a statement made in an answer that", "a statement made in an answer that is EXTREMELY opinion-laden: > > So,", "than trying to \"see what can be done,\" the solution is to recognize", "this concept morally dubious. To illustrate, here's a statement made in an answer", "> > I strongly disagree with this highly controversial statement, and I note", "didn't fit with such meta-philosophies. If that's not the case for this particular", "when this interference is at the discretion of authorities and policing is inconsistent,", "> > So, rather than trying to plead for another chance, rather than", "comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a", "imagine, there were equally controversial statements that were removed simply because they didn't", "remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice. > > > I find this", "most likely because it fits with the politics or meta-philosophies of certain moderators.", "ethical point of view, but when this interference is at the discretion of", "> So, rather than trying to plead for another chance, rather than trying", "opinion-laden statements, but only gives moderators the option of removal, consequently confers inordinate", "or morally sound. Interfering with people's freedom of speech is already problematic from", "not require the consistent removal of controversial or opinion-laden statements, but only gives", "\"controversial question\" mechanism and I think that academia.stackexchange should search for more ethically", "post mechanism, which by its nature does not require the consistent removal of", "mechanism and I think that academia.stackexchange should search for more ethically sound ways", "asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice. > >", "that is EXTREMELY opinion-laden: > > So, rather than trying to plead for", "its nature does not require the consistent removal of controversial or opinion-laden statements,", "the controversial post mechanism, which by its nature does not require the consistent", "chance, rather than trying to \"see what can be done,\" the solution is", "at the discretion of authorities and policing is inconsistent, it becomes orders of", "an answer that is EXTREMELY opinion-laden: > > So, rather than trying to", "for another chance, rather than trying to \"see what can be done,\" the", "> > > I find this concept morally dubious. To illustrate, here's a", "rather than trying to \"see what can be done,\" the solution is to", "as a \"controversial post.\" The text says: > > Controversial Post — You", "error that cannot be rectified. > > > I strongly disagree with this", "to provide a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove", "opinions upon others to a much greater extent than can be considered necessary", "with the politics or meta-philosophies of certain moderators. Further to this, I imagine,", "done,\" the solution is to recognize that you have made a serious error", "I oppose the use of \"controversial question\" mechanism and I think that academia.stackexchange", "another chance, rather than trying to \"see what can be done,\" the solution", "> > > I strongly disagree with this highly controversial statement, and I", "questions so-marked as controversial. My point is this: the controversial post mechanism, which", "be done,\" the solution is to recognize that you have made a serious", "specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice.", "more problematic. For these reasons and others, I oppose the use of \"controversial", "So, rather than trying to plead for another chance, rather than trying to", "this particular question, then at least it's probably the case for other questions", "morally dubious. To illustrate, here's a statement made in an answer that is", "the solution is to recognize that you have made a serious error that", "If that's not the case for this particular question, then at least it's", "then at least it's probably the case for other questions so-marked as controversial.", "only gives moderators the option of removal, consequently confers inordinate power to moderators", "have made a serious error that cannot be rectified. > > > I", "to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions", "question\" mechanism and I think that academia.stackexchange should search for more ethically sound", "illustrate, here's a statement made in an answer that is EXTREMELY opinion-laden: >", "is EXTREMELY opinion-laden: > > So, rather than trying to plead for another", "without notice,\" most likely because it fits with the politics or meta-philosophies of", "meta-philosophies of certain moderators. Further to this, I imagine, there were equally controversial", "this highly controversial statement, and I note that it hasn't been \"removed without", "that's not the case for this particular question, then at least it's probably", "serious error that cannot be rectified. > > > I strongly disagree with", "fits with the politics or meta-philosophies of certain moderators. Further to this, I", "of view, but when this interference is at the discretion of authorities and", "question, then at least it's probably the case for other questions so-marked as", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109343/slept-through-final-professor-is-giving-me-a-zero-and-failing-me-is-there-any) question was marked as a \"controversial post.\" The text says: > >", "least it's probably the case for other questions so-marked as controversial. My point", "inordinate power to moderators and allows them to impose their political views and", "to impose their political views and personal opinions upon others to a much", "> > Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements.", "than can be considered necessary or morally sound. Interfering with people's freedom of", "point of view, but when this interference is at the discretion of authorities", "\"see what can be done,\" the solution is to recognize that you have", "politics or meta-philosophies of certain moderators. Further to this, I imagine, there were", "I note that it hasn't been \"removed without notice,\" most likely because it", "to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to", "with such meta-philosophies. If that's not the case for this particular question, then", "the consistent removal of controversial or opinion-laden statements, but only gives moderators the", "opinion-laden: > > So, rather than trying to plead for another chance, rather", "will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice. > > > I find", "the politics or meta-philosophies of certain moderators. Further to this, I imagine, there", "Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice. > > > I", "what can be done,\" the solution is to recognize that you have made", "The text says: > > Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY", "> I strongly disagree with this highly controversial statement, and I note that", "been \"removed without notice,\" most likely because it fits with the politics or", "to this, I imagine, there were equally controversial statements that were removed simply", "impose their political views and personal opinions upon others to a much greater", "of magnitude more problematic. For these reasons and others, I oppose the use", "without notice. > > > I find this concept morally dubious. To illustrate,", "find this concept morally dubious. To illustrate, here's a statement made in an", "statement, and I note that it hasn't been \"removed without notice,\" most likely", "it fits with the politics or meta-philosophies of certain moderators. Further to this,", "people's freedom of speech is already problematic from an ethical point of view,", "the case for other questions so-marked as controversial. My point is this: the", "than trying to plead for another chance, rather than trying to \"see what", "statements that were removed simply because they didn't fit with such meta-philosophies. If", "text says: > > Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to", "a \"controversial post.\" The text says: > > Controversial Post — You may", "notice. > > > I find this concept morally dubious. To illustrate, here's", "made in an answer that is EXTREMELY opinion-laden: > > So, rather than", "because it fits with the politics or meta-philosophies of certain moderators. Further to", "rather than trying to plead for another chance, rather than trying to \"see", "this: the controversial post mechanism, which by its nature does not require the", "it hasn't been \"removed without notice,\" most likely because it fits with the", "think that academia.stackexchange should search for more ethically sound ways of reducing interpersonal", "moderators and allows them to impose their political views and personal opinions upon", "disagree with this highly controversial statement, and I note that it hasn't been", "and I think that academia.stackexchange should search for more ethically sound ways of", "can be done,\" the solution is to recognize that you have made a", "moderators the option of removal, consequently confers inordinate power to moderators and allows", "it's probably the case for other questions so-marked as controversial. My point is", "improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific", "> Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You", "to moderators and allows them to impose their political views and personal opinions", "that academia.stackexchange should search for more ethically sound ways of reducing interpersonal conflict.", "these reasons and others, I oppose the use of \"controversial question\" mechanism and", "arguments or opinions without notice. > > > I find this concept morally", "point is this: the controversial post mechanism, which by its nature does not", "already problematic from an ethical point of view, but when this interference is", "debates, arguments or opinions without notice. > > > I find this concept", "answer that is EXTREMELY opinion-laden: > > So, rather than trying to plead", "that were removed simply because they didn't fit with such meta-philosophies. If that's", "freedom of speech is already problematic from an ethical point of view, but", "sound. Interfering with people's freedom of speech is already problematic from an ethical", "can be considered necessary or morally sound. Interfering with people's freedom of speech", "orders of magnitude more problematic. For these reasons and others, I oppose the", "the use of \"controversial question\" mechanism and I think that academia.stackexchange should search", "likely because it fits with the politics or meta-philosophies of certain moderators. Further", "their political views and personal opinions upon others to a much greater extent", "particular question, then at least it's probably the case for other questions so-marked", "case for this particular question, then at least it's probably the case for", "gives moderators the option of removal, consequently confers inordinate power to moderators and", "removed simply because they didn't fit with such meta-philosophies. If that's not the", "solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or", "cannot be rectified. > > > I strongly disagree with this highly controversial", "controversial post mechanism, which by its nature does not require the consistent removal", "speech is already problematic from an ethical point of view, but when this", "the option of removal, consequently confers inordinate power to moderators and allows them", "not the case for this particular question, then at least it's probably the", "problematic from an ethical point of view, but when this interference is at", "magnitude more problematic. For these reasons and others, I oppose the use of", "noticed that [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109343/slept-through-final-professor-is-giving-me-a-zero-and-failing-me-is-there-any) question was marked as a \"controversial post.\" The text says:", "at least it's probably the case for other questions so-marked as controversial. My", "confers inordinate power to moderators and allows them to impose their political views", "because they didn't fit with such meta-philosophies. If that's not the case for", "ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will", "You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY", "provide a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates,", "oppose the use of \"controversial question\" mechanism and I think that academia.stackexchange should", "which by its nature does not require the consistent removal of controversial or", "personal opinions upon others to a much greater extent than can be considered", "statement made in an answer that is EXTREMELY opinion-laden: > > So, rather", "that [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109343/slept-through-final-professor-is-giving-me-a-zero-and-failing-me-is-there-any) question was marked as a \"controversial post.\" The text says: >", "I noticed that [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109343/slept-through-final-professor-is-giving-me-a-zero-and-failing-me-is-there-any) question was marked as a \"controversial post.\" The text", "— You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers", "for other questions so-marked as controversial. My point is this: the controversial post", "be considered necessary or morally sound. Interfering with people's freedom of speech is", "option of removal, consequently confers inordinate power to moderators and allows them to", "is at the discretion of authorities and policing is inconsistent, it becomes orders", "the discretion of authorities and policing is inconsistent, it becomes orders of magnitude", "this interference is at the discretion of authorities and policing is inconsistent, it", "trying to plead for another chance, rather than trying to \"see what can", "You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question", "I imagine, there were equally controversial statements that were removed simply because they", "suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the", "removal, consequently confers inordinate power to moderators and allows them to impose their", "consequently confers inordinate power to moderators and allows them to impose their political", "meta-philosophies. If that's not the case for this particular question, then at least", "My point is this: the controversial post mechanism, which by its nature does", "To illustrate, here's a statement made in an answer that is EXTREMELY opinion-laden:", "is to recognize that you have made a serious error that cannot be", "greater extent than can be considered necessary or morally sound. Interfering with people's", "> I find this concept morally dubious. To illustrate, here's a statement made", "Further to this, I imagine, there were equally controversial statements that were removed", "for this particular question, then at least it's probably the case for other", "as controversial. My point is this: the controversial post mechanism, which by its", "upon others to a much greater extent than can be considered necessary or", "and personal opinions upon others to a much greater extent than can be", "\"controversial post.\" The text says: > > Controversial Post — You may use", "simply because they didn't fit with such meta-philosophies. If that's not the case", "of removal, consequently confers inordinate power to moderators and allows them to impose", "such meta-philosophies. If that's not the case for this particular question, then at", "with this highly controversial statement, and I note that it hasn't been \"removed", "is already problematic from an ethical point of view, but when this interference", "For these reasons and others, I oppose the use of \"controversial question\" mechanism", "the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without", "a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments", "in an answer that is EXTREMELY opinion-laden: > > So, rather than trying", "to plead for another chance, rather than trying to \"see what can be", "moderators. Further to this, I imagine, there were equally controversial statements that were", "EXTREMELY opinion-laden: > > So, rather than trying to plead for another chance,", "much greater extent than can be considered necessary or morally sound. Interfering with", "reasons and others, I oppose the use of \"controversial question\" mechanism and I", "trying to \"see what can be done,\" the solution is to recognize that", "recognize that you have made a serious error that cannot be rectified. >", "to recognize that you have made a serious error that cannot be rectified.", "strongly disagree with this highly controversial statement, and I note that it hasn't", "political views and personal opinions upon others to a much greater extent than", "or opinion-laden statements, but only gives moderators the option of removal, consequently confers", "others, I oppose the use of \"controversial question\" mechanism and I think that", "necessary or morally sound. Interfering with people's freedom of speech is already problematic", "made a serious error that cannot be rectified. > > > I strongly", "consistent removal of controversial or opinion-laden statements, but only gives moderators the option", "they didn't fit with such meta-philosophies. If that's not the case for this", "problematic. For these reasons and others, I oppose the use of \"controversial question\"", "and I note that it hasn't been \"removed without notice,\" most likely because", "removal of controversial or opinion-laden statements, but only gives moderators the option of", "them to impose their political views and personal opinions upon others to a", "by its nature does not require the consistent removal of controversial or opinion-laden", "ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to provide a solution", "solution is to recognize that you have made a serious error that cannot", "authorities and policing is inconsistent, it becomes orders of magnitude more problematic. For", "controversial statement, and I note that it hasn't been \"removed without notice,\" most", "Interfering with people's freedom of speech is already problematic from an ethical point", "be rectified. > > > I strongly disagree with this highly controversial statement,", "to a much greater extent than can be considered necessary or morally sound.", "opinions without notice. > > > I find this concept morally dubious. To", "or opinions without notice. > > > I find this concept morally dubious.", "a serious error that cannot be rectified. > > > I strongly disagree", "note that it hasn't been \"removed without notice,\" most likely because it fits", "of \"controversial question\" mechanism and I think that academia.stackexchange should search for more", "does not require the consistent removal of controversial or opinion-laden statements, but only", "controversial statements that were removed simply because they didn't fit with such meta-philosophies.", "and allows them to impose their political views and personal opinions upon others", "discretion of authorities and policing is inconsistent, it becomes orders of magnitude more", "morally sound. Interfering with people's freedom of speech is already problematic from an", "were equally controversial statements that were removed simply because they didn't fit with", "Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use", "that it hasn't been \"removed without notice,\" most likely because it fits with", "of speech is already problematic from an ethical point of view, but when", "the case for this particular question, then at least it's probably the case", "power to moderators and allows them to impose their political views and personal", "of certain moderators. Further to this, I imagine, there were equally controversial statements", "post.\" The text says: > > Controversial Post — You may use comments", "nature does not require the consistent removal of controversial or opinion-laden statements, but", "I find this concept morally dubious. To illustrate, here's a statement made in", "rectified. > > > I strongly disagree with this highly controversial statement, and", "use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question asked above.", "policing is inconsistent, it becomes orders of magnitude more problematic. For these reasons", "plead for another chance, rather than trying to \"see what can be done,\"", "of controversial or opinion-laden statements, but only gives moderators the option of removal,", "controversial or opinion-laden statements, but only gives moderators the option of removal, consequently", "with people's freedom of speech is already problematic from an ethical point of", "you have made a serious error that cannot be rectified. > > >", "hasn't been \"removed without notice,\" most likely because it fits with the politics", "from an ethical point of view, but when this interference is at the", "marked as a \"controversial post.\" The text says: > > Controversial Post —", "is this: the controversial post mechanism, which by its nature does not require", "mechanism, which by its nature does not require the consistent removal of controversial", "that cannot be rectified. > > > I strongly disagree with this highly", "a much greater extent than can be considered necessary or morally sound. Interfering", "interference is at the discretion of authorities and policing is inconsistent, it becomes", "inconsistent, it becomes orders of magnitude more problematic. For these reasons and others,", "or meta-philosophies of certain moderators. Further to this, I imagine, there were equally", "use of \"controversial question\" mechanism and I think that academia.stackexchange should search for", "Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may", "others to a much greater extent than can be considered necessary or morally", "may use comments ONLY to suggest improvements. You may use answers ONLY to", "but when this interference is at the discretion of authorities and policing is", "answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question asked above. Moderators", "\"removed without notice,\" most likely because it fits with the politics or meta-philosophies", "so-marked as controversial. My point is this: the controversial post mechanism, which by", "I strongly disagree with this highly controversial statement, and I note that it", "may use answers ONLY to provide a solution to the specific question asked", "case for other questions so-marked as controversial. My point is this: the controversial", "but only gives moderators the option of removal, consequently confers inordinate power to", "controversial. My point is this: the controversial post mechanism, which by its nature", "were removed simply because they didn't fit with such meta-philosophies. If that's not", "statements, but only gives moderators the option of removal, consequently confers inordinate power", "dubious. To illustrate, here's a statement made in an answer that is EXTREMELY", "question asked above. Moderators will remove debates, arguments or opinions without notice. >", "> > I find this concept morally dubious. To illustrate, here's a statement", "equally controversial statements that were removed simply because they didn't fit with such", "fit with such meta-philosophies. If that's not the case for this particular question,", "of authorities and policing is inconsistent, it becomes orders of magnitude more problematic.", "require the consistent removal of controversial or opinion-laden statements, but only gives moderators", "that you have made a serious error that cannot be rectified. > >", "there were equally controversial statements that were removed simply because they didn't fit", "extent than can be considered necessary or morally sound. Interfering with people's freedom", "to \"see what can be done,\" the solution is to recognize that you", "probably the case for other questions so-marked as controversial. My point is this:", "views and personal opinions upon others to a much greater extent than can", "considered necessary or morally sound. Interfering with people's freedom of speech is already", "allows them to impose their political views and personal opinions upon others to", "was marked as a \"controversial post.\" The text says: > > Controversial Post", "and policing is inconsistent, it becomes orders of magnitude more problematic. For these", "it becomes orders of magnitude more problematic. For these reasons and others, I", "I think that academia.stackexchange should search for more ethically sound ways of reducing", "notice,\" most likely because it fits with the politics or meta-philosophies of certain", "here's a statement made in an answer that is EXTREMELY opinion-laden: > >", "becomes orders of magnitude more problematic. For these reasons and others, I oppose", "other questions so-marked as controversial. My point is this: the controversial post mechanism,", "view, but when this interference is at the discretion of authorities and policing", "says: > > Controversial Post — You may use comments ONLY to suggest", "this, I imagine, there were equally controversial statements that were removed simply because" ]
[ "controversy in comments and answers, in particular with respect to whether it shall", "to this site. Migration would only happen if the target site wants it", "question: * Should it stay closed? * Should it be reopened as it", "In an answer please propose how we should proceed with this question: ", "should proceed with this question: Should it stay closed? * Should it", "department\" joke, and how can I avoid offending people in a similar way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734)", "proceed with this question: * Should it stay closed? * Should it be", "for Thought It would be great if you could address these questions in", "great if you could address these questions in an answer: * Does this", "here. Be aware that there are already seventy deleted comments on this question", "changed in a specific manner and then reopened? Please answer only with respect", "contest? --- Update: A [new question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436) has been posted, following from the discussion", "Be aware that there are already seventy deleted comments on this question and", "very tedious due to other matters being discussed in parallel, we (read: some", "this issue here. Be aware that there are already seventy deleted comments on", "that this question turns into a popularity contest? --- Update: A [new question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436)", "the discussion below Jake Beal's answer. The new question has some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4165/follow-on-to-the-lingerie-elevator-question).", "it be avoided that this question turns into a popularity contest? --- Update:", "other matters being discussed in parallel, we (read: some moderators) have decided to", "with respect to this site. Migration would only happen if the target site", "would only happen if the target site wants it (which is unlikely) and", "these questions in an answer: * Does this question fit our scope? ", "its answers, some of which were [not nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice). ### This Question In an", "avoided that this question turns into a popularity contest? --- Update: A [new", "### This Question In an answer please propose how we should proceed with", "deleted comments on this question and its answers, some of which were [not", "will inevitably get very tedious due to other matters being discussed in parallel,", "in the comments or chat will inevitably get very tedious due to other", "question and its answers, some of which were [not nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice). ### This Question", "offensive about the \"ladies lingerie department\" joke, and how can I avoid offending", "you could address these questions in an answer: Does this question fit", "this question turns into a popularity contest? --- Update: A [new question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436) has", "Does this question fit our scope? * Is the question reasonably narrow? ", "scope? Is the question reasonably narrow? * Is it reasonably clear what", "Food for Thought It would be great if you could address these questions", "manner and then reopened? Please answer only with respect to this site. Migration", "could address these questions in an answer: * Does this question fit our", "or closed. Since any discussion on this in the comments or chat will", "parallel, we (read: some moderators) have decided to lock the question and take", "and take this issue here. Be aware that there are already seventy deleted", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436) has been posted, following from the discussion below Jake Beal's answer. The", "\"ladies lingerie department\" joke, and how can I avoid offending people in a", "about the \"ladies lingerie department\" joke, and how can I avoid offending people", "unlikely) and thus not something we can decide. ### Food for Thought It", "asked? * Can it be avoided that this question turns into a popularity", "aware that there are already seventy deleted comments on this question and its", "specific manner and then reopened? Please answer only with respect to this site.", "with this question: * Should it stay closed? * Should it be reopened", "with respect to whether it shall be open or closed. Since any discussion", "target site wants it (which is unlikely) and thus not something we can", "the question reasonably narrow? * Is it reasonably clear what is being asked?", "that there are already seventy deleted comments on this question and its answers,", "this in the comments or chat will inevitably get very tedious due to", "it is? * Should it be changed in a specific manner and then", "lot of controversy in comments and answers, in particular with respect to whether", "it (which is unlikely) and thus not something we can decide. ### Food", "would be great if you could address these questions in an answer: ", "and how can I avoid offending people in a similar way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734) has caused", "whether it shall be open or closed. Since any discussion on this in", "[What was offensive about the \"ladies lingerie department\" joke, and how can I", "and its answers, some of which were [not nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice). ### This Question In", "being discussed in parallel, we (read: some moderators) have decided to lock the", "was offensive about the \"ladies lingerie department\" joke, and how can I avoid", "joke, and how can I avoid offending people in a similar way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734) has", "people in a similar way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734) has caused a lot of controversy in comments", " Should it be changed in a specific manner and then reopened? Please", "on this in the comments or chat will inevitably get very tedious due", "chat will inevitably get very tedious due to other matters being discussed in", "be reopened as it is? * Should it be changed in a specific", "answer please propose how we should proceed with this question: * Should it", "question fit our scope? * Is the question reasonably narrow? * Is it", "similar way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734) has caused a lot of controversy in comments and answers, in", "it shall be open or closed. Since any discussion on this in the", "the target site wants it (which is unlikely) and thus not something we", "--- Update: A [new question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436) has been posted, following from the discussion below", "Should it be changed in a specific manner and then reopened? Please answer", "propose how we should proceed with this question: * Should it stay closed?", "discussion on this in the comments or chat will inevitably get very tedious", "if you could address these questions in an answer: * Does this question", "in comments and answers, in particular with respect to whether it shall be", "can decide. ### Food for Thought It would be great if you could", "a popularity contest? --- Update: A [new question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436) has been posted, following from", "the \"ladies lingerie department\" joke, and how can I avoid offending people in", "decide. ### Food for Thought It would be great if you could address", "this question: * Should it stay closed? * Should it be reopened as", "any discussion on this in the comments or chat will inevitably get very", "(read: some moderators) have decided to lock the question and take this issue", "it be reopened as it is? * Should it be changed in a", "question reasonably narrow? * Is it reasonably clear what is being asked? ", "some of which were [not nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice). ### This Question In an answer please", "comments and answers, in particular with respect to whether it shall be open", "question and take this issue here. Be aware that there are already seventy", "Update: A [new question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436) has been posted, following from the discussion below Jake", "answer only with respect to this site. Migration would only happen if the", "Is the question reasonably narrow? Is it reasonably clear what is being", "The question [What was offensive about the \"ladies lingerie department\" joke, and how", "reasonably clear what is being asked? * Can it be avoided that this", "(which is unlikely) and thus not something we can decide. ### Food for", "been posted, following from the discussion below Jake Beal's answer. The new question", "shall be open or closed. Since any discussion on this in the comments", "only happen if the target site wants it (which is unlikely) and thus", "respect to whether it shall be open or closed. Since any discussion on", "which were [not nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice). ### This Question In an answer please propose how", "open or closed. Since any discussion on this in the comments or chat", "site wants it (which is unlikely) and thus not something we can decide.", "* Can it be avoided that this question turns into a popularity contest?", "some moderators) have decided to lock the question and take this issue here.", "answers, in particular with respect to whether it shall be open or closed.", "This Question In an answer please propose how we should proceed with this", "an answer please propose how we should proceed with this question: * Should", "not something we can decide. ### Food for Thought It would be great", "tedious due to other matters being discussed in parallel, we (read: some moderators)", "there are already seventy deleted comments on this question and its answers, some", "respect to this site. Migration would only happen if the target site wants", "is being asked? * Can it be avoided that this question turns into", "questions in an answer: * Does this question fit our scope? * Is", "lock the question and take this issue here. Be aware that there are", "issue here. Be aware that there are already seventy deleted comments on this", "seventy deleted comments on this question and its answers, some of which were", "this site. Migration would only happen if the target site wants it (which", "following from the discussion below Jake Beal's answer. The new question has some", "something we can decide. ### Food for Thought It would be great if", "it reasonably clear what is being asked? * Can it be avoided that", "into a popularity contest? --- Update: A [new question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436) has been posted, following", "Since any discussion on this in the comments or chat will inevitably get", "answers, some of which were [not nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice). ### This Question In an answer", "* Does this question fit our scope? * Is the question reasonably narrow?", "in an answer: * Does this question fit our scope? * Is the", "be avoided that this question turns into a popularity contest? --- Update: A", "of controversy in comments and answers, in particular with respect to whether it", "we (read: some moderators) have decided to lock the question and take this", "Should it be reopened as it is? * Should it be changed in", "has been posted, following from the discussion below Jake Beal's answer. The new", "question turns into a popularity contest? --- Update: A [new question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436) has been", "decided to lock the question and take this issue here. Be aware that", "have decided to lock the question and take this issue here. Be aware", "discussed in parallel, we (read: some moderators) have decided to lock the question", "in particular with respect to whether it shall be open or closed. Since", "can I avoid offending people in a similar way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734) has caused a lot", "please propose how we should proceed with this question: * Should it stay", "moderators) have decided to lock the question and take this issue here. Be", "Thought It would be great if you could address these questions in an", "due to other matters being discussed in parallel, we (read: some moderators) have", "caused a lot of controversy in comments and answers, in particular with respect", "in a specific manner and then reopened? Please answer only with respect to", "* Is it reasonably clear what is being asked? * Can it be", "I avoid offending people in a similar way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734) has caused a lot of", "as it is? * Should it be changed in a specific manner and", "Migration would only happen if the target site wants it (which is unlikely)", "our scope? * Is the question reasonably narrow? * Is it reasonably clear", "comments or chat will inevitably get very tedious due to other matters being", "then reopened? Please answer only with respect to this site. Migration would only", "being asked? * Can it be avoided that this question turns into a", "stay closed? * Should it be reopened as it is? * Should it", "### Food for Thought It would be great if you could address these", "and answers, in particular with respect to whether it shall be open or", "on this question and its answers, some of which were [not nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice). ###", "and thus not something we can decide. ### Food for Thought It would", "Can it be avoided that this question turns into a popularity contest? ---", "* Should it be reopened as it is? * Should it be changed", "answer: * Does this question fit our scope? * Is the question reasonably", "comments on this question and its answers, some of which were [not nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice).", "question [What was offensive about the \"ladies lingerie department\" joke, and how can", "inevitably get very tedious due to other matters being discussed in parallel, we", "get very tedious due to other matters being discussed in parallel, we (read:", "what is being asked? * Can it be avoided that this question turns", "and then reopened? Please answer only with respect to this site. Migration would", "be open or closed. Since any discussion on this in the comments or", "or chat will inevitably get very tedious due to other matters being discussed", "site. Migration would only happen if the target site wants it (which is", "clear what is being asked? * Can it be avoided that this question", "to whether it shall be open or closed. Since any discussion on this", "nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice). ### This Question In an answer please propose how we should proceed", "an answer: * Does this question fit our scope? * Is the question", "from the discussion below Jake Beal's answer. The new question has some discussion", "closed? * Should it be reopened as it is? * Should it be", "happen if the target site wants it (which is unlikely) and thus not", "wants it (which is unlikely) and thus not something we can decide. ###", "is unlikely) and thus not something we can decide. ### Food for Thought", "is? * Should it be changed in a specific manner and then reopened?", "of which were [not nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice). ### This Question In an answer please propose", "how can I avoid offending people in a similar way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734) has caused a", "offending people in a similar way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734) has caused a lot of controversy in", "the comments or chat will inevitably get very tedious due to other matters", "we can decide. ### Food for Thought It would be great if you", "it stay closed? * Should it be reopened as it is? * Should", "reasonably narrow? * Is it reasonably clear what is being asked? * Can", "posted, following from the discussion below Jake Beal's answer. The new question has", "take this issue here. Be aware that there are already seventy deleted comments", "popularity contest? --- Update: A [new question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436) has been posted, following from the", "[new question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436) has been posted, following from the discussion below Jake Beal's answer.", "are already seventy deleted comments on this question and its answers, some of", "Question In an answer please propose how we should proceed with this question:", "avoid offending people in a similar way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734) has caused a lot of controversy", "reopened? Please answer only with respect to this site. Migration would only happen", "to other matters being discussed in parallel, we (read: some moderators) have decided", "to lock the question and take this issue here. Be aware that there", "thus not something we can decide. ### Food for Thought It would be", "narrow? * Is it reasonably clear what is being asked? * Can it", "Please answer only with respect to this site. Migration would only happen if", "already seventy deleted comments on this question and its answers, some of which", "address these questions in an answer: * Does this question fit our scope?", "way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734) has caused a lot of controversy in comments and answers, in particular", "in a similar way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734) has caused a lot of controversy in comments and", "reopened as it is? * Should it be changed in a specific manner", "only with respect to this site. Migration would only happen if the target", "a similar way?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109789/7734) has caused a lot of controversy in comments and answers,", "[not nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice). ### This Question In an answer please propose how we should", "a lot of controversy in comments and answers, in particular with respect to", "matters being discussed in parallel, we (read: some moderators) have decided to lock", "if the target site wants it (which is unlikely) and thus not something", "the question and take this issue here. Be aware that there are already", "be great if you could address these questions in an answer: * Does", "be changed in a specific manner and then reopened? Please answer only with", "fit our scope? * Is the question reasonably narrow? * Is it reasonably", "A [new question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436) has been posted, following from the discussion below Jake Beal's", "this question and its answers, some of which were [not nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice). ### This", "this question fit our scope? * Is the question reasonably narrow? * Is", "It would be great if you could address these questions in an answer:", "how we should proceed with this question: * Should it stay closed? ", "we should proceed with this question: Should it stay closed? * Should", "* Should it stay closed? * Should it be reopened as it is?", "* Is the question reasonably narrow? * Is it reasonably clear what is", "particular with respect to whether it shall be open or closed. Since any", "turns into a popularity contest? --- Update: A [new question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109937/32436) has been posted,", "Is it reasonably clear what is being asked? * Can it be avoided", "closed. Since any discussion on this in the comments or chat will inevitably", "were [not nice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/be-nice). ### This Question In an answer please propose how we", "in parallel, we (read: some moderators) have decided to lock the question and", "has caused a lot of controversy in comments and answers, in particular with", "lingerie department\" joke, and how can I avoid offending people in a similar", "a specific manner and then reopened? Please answer only with respect to this", "Should it stay closed? * Should it be reopened as it is? *", "it be changed in a specific manner and then reopened? Please answer only" ]
[ "the website, but I didn't get a conclusive answer. Can I ask this", "there: I got my Ph.D. years ago). Specifically, I'm interested in a certain", "a certain department. I did some due diligence, such as looking at the", "looking at the Google Scholar profile of one of the professors, and looking", "the Google Scholar profile of one of the professors, and looking at the", "in a certain department. I did some due diligence, such as looking at", "at the Google Scholar profile of one of the professors, and looking at", "website, but I didn't get a conclusive answer. Can I ask this question", "I need to know about the level of research conducted in a certain", "ago). Specifically, I'm interested in a certain department. I did some due diligence,", "due diligence, such as looking at the Google Scholar profile of one of", "diligence, such as looking at the Google Scholar profile of one of the", "I didn't get a conclusive answer. Can I ask this question on Academia.SE?", "a certain university (not because I want to study there: I got my", "university (not because I want to study there: I got my Ph.D. years", "need to know about the level of research conducted in a certain university", "such as looking at the Google Scholar profile of one of the professors,", "I got my Ph.D. years ago). Specifically, I'm interested in a certain department.", "certain department. I did some due diligence, such as looking at the Google", "as looking at the Google Scholar profile of one of the professors, and", "Google Scholar profile of one of the professors, and looking at the website,", "professors, and looking at the website, but I didn't get a conclusive answer.", "level of research conducted in a certain university (not because I want to", "but I didn't get a conclusive answer. Can I ask this question on", "I'm interested in a certain department. I did some due diligence, such as", "(not because I want to study there: I got my Ph.D. years ago).", "and looking at the website, but I didn't get a conclusive answer. Can", "interested in a certain department. I did some due diligence, such as looking", "want to study there: I got my Ph.D. years ago). Specifically, I'm interested", "of the professors, and looking at the website, but I didn't get a", "years ago). Specifically, I'm interested in a certain department. I did some due", "got my Ph.D. years ago). Specifically, I'm interested in a certain department. I", "looking at the website, but I didn't get a conclusive answer. Can I", "in a certain university (not because I want to study there: I got", "department. I did some due diligence, such as looking at the Google Scholar", "of research conducted in a certain university (not because I want to study", "research conducted in a certain university (not because I want to study there:", "some reasons I need to know about the level of research conducted in", "conducted in a certain university (not because I want to study there: I", "about the level of research conducted in a certain university (not because I", "profile of one of the professors, and looking at the website, but I", "one of the professors, and looking at the website, but I didn't get", "of one of the professors, and looking at the website, but I didn't", "the professors, and looking at the website, but I didn't get a conclusive", "at the website, but I didn't get a conclusive answer. Can I ask", "study there: I got my Ph.D. years ago). Specifically, I'm interested in a", "the level of research conducted in a certain university (not because I want", "For some reasons I need to know about the level of research conducted", "certain university (not because I want to study there: I got my Ph.D.", "Ph.D. years ago). Specifically, I'm interested in a certain department. I did some", "to study there: I got my Ph.D. years ago). Specifically, I'm interested in", "my Ph.D. years ago). Specifically, I'm interested in a certain department. I did", "know about the level of research conducted in a certain university (not because", "I want to study there: I got my Ph.D. years ago). Specifically, I'm", "Specifically, I'm interested in a certain department. I did some due diligence, such", "reasons I need to know about the level of research conducted in a", "some due diligence, such as looking at the Google Scholar profile of one", "because I want to study there: I got my Ph.D. years ago). Specifically,", "I did some due diligence, such as looking at the Google Scholar profile", "Scholar profile of one of the professors, and looking at the website, but", "to know about the level of research conducted in a certain university (not", "did some due diligence, such as looking at the Google Scholar profile of" ]