ngram
listlengths
0
10.5k
[ "[example of rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd)) Personally I think they could be on topic because they", "x*? * what are the current (2015) rankings for journals in the field", "are the average times from submission to acceptance/publication for *journal x*? * what", "what is the impact factor of *journal x*? (probably shouldn't need to ask", "a paywall... [example of rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd)) Personally I think they could be on topic", "paywall... [example of rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd)) Personally I think they could be on topic because", "on topic here? e.g. * what is the impact factor of *journal x*?", "could be on topic because they are objective (rather than subjective shopping questions)", "as this info is widely available) * what is the average review time", "rankings, but recent info is generaly behind a paywall... [example of rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd)) Personally", "the field of x? (such info can be found for older rankings, but", "recent info is generaly behind a paywall... [example of rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd)) Personally I think", "generaly behind a paywall... [example of rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd)) Personally I think they could be", "for *journal x*? * what are the current (2015) rankings for journals in", "is the average review time for *journal x*? * what are the average", "of *journal x*? (probably shouldn't need to ask it here as this info", "but recent info is generaly behind a paywall... [example of rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd)) Personally I", "are objective (rather than subjective shopping questions) requests for information which is highly", "journal statistics on topic here? e.g. * what is the impact factor of", "for older rankings, but recent info is generaly behind a paywall... [example of", "found for older rankings, but recent info is generaly behind a paywall... [example", "is generaly behind a paywall... [example of rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd)) Personally I think they could", "of rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd)) Personally I think they could be on topic because they are", "it here as this info is widely available) * what is the average", "*journal x*? (probably shouldn't need to ask it here as this info is", "for *journal x*? * what are the average times from submission to acceptance/publication", "journals in the field of x? (such info can be found for older", "what are the current (2015) rankings for journals in the field of x?", "because they are objective (rather than subjective shopping questions) requests for information which", "submission to acceptance/publication for *journal x*? * what are the current (2015) rankings", "rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd)) Personally I think they could be on topic because they are objective", "x? (such info can be found for older rankings, but recent info is", "e.g. * what is the impact factor of *journal x*? (probably shouldn't need", "x*? * what are the average times from submission to acceptance/publication for *journal", "of x? (such info can be found for older rankings, but recent info", "widely available) * what is the average review time for *journal x*? *", "time for *journal x*? * what are the average times from submission to", "*journal x*? * what are the current (2015) rankings for journals in the", "(rather than subjective shopping questions) requests for information which is highly relevant to", "(such info can be found for older rankings, but recent info is generaly", "here as this info is widely available) * what is the average review", "Are questions about journal statistics on topic here? e.g. * what is the", "they could be on topic because they are objective (rather than subjective shopping", "average times from submission to acceptance/publication for *journal x*? * what are the", "(probably shouldn't need to ask it here as this info is widely available)", "older rankings, but recent info is generaly behind a paywall... [example of rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd))", "to ask it here as this info is widely available) * what is", "they are objective (rather than subjective shopping questions) requests for information which is", "info can be found for older rankings, but recent info is generaly behind", "think they could be on topic because they are objective (rather than subjective", "average review time for *journal x*? * what are the average times from", "from submission to acceptance/publication for *journal x*? * what are the current (2015)", "in the field of x? (such info can be found for older rankings,", "review time for *journal x*? * what are the average times from submission", "factor of *journal x*? (probably shouldn't need to ask it here as this", "this info is widely available) * what is the average review time for", "what is the average review time for *journal x*? * what are the", "questions about journal statistics on topic here? e.g. * what is the impact", "topic because they are objective (rather than subjective shopping questions) requests for information", "acceptance/publication for *journal x*? * what are the current (2015) rankings for journals", "Personally I think they could be on topic because they are objective (rather", "the current (2015) rankings for journals in the field of x? (such info", "* what is the impact factor of *journal x*? (probably shouldn't need to", "(2015) rankings for journals in the field of x? (such info can be", "I think they could be on topic because they are objective (rather than", "ask it here as this info is widely available) * what is the", "times from submission to acceptance/publication for *journal x*? * what are the current", "* what are the average times from submission to acceptance/publication for *journal x*?", "need to ask it here as this info is widely available) * what", "for journals in the field of x? (such info can be found for", "info is generaly behind a paywall... [example of rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd)) Personally I think they", "objective (rather than subjective shopping questions) requests for information which is highly relevant", "what are the average times from submission to acceptance/publication for *journal x*? *", "topic here? e.g. * what is the impact factor of *journal x*? (probably", "available) * what is the average review time for *journal x*? * what", "impact factor of *journal x*? (probably shouldn't need to ask it here as", "behind a paywall... [example of rankings](http://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?area=1100&category=1105&country=all&year=2013&order=sjr&min=0&min_type=cd)) Personally I think they could be on", "field of x? (such info can be found for older rankings, but recent", "the impact factor of *journal x*? (probably shouldn't need to ask it here", "info is widely available) * what is the average review time for *journal", "* what are the current (2015) rankings for journals in the field of", "here? e.g. * what is the impact factor of *journal x*? (probably shouldn't", "to acceptance/publication for *journal x*? * what are the current (2015) rankings for", "are the current (2015) rankings for journals in the field of x? (such", "*journal x*? * what are the average times from submission to acceptance/publication for", "statistics on topic here? e.g. * what is the impact factor of *journal", "* what is the average review time for *journal x*? * what are", "about journal statistics on topic here? e.g. * what is the impact factor", "is the impact factor of *journal x*? (probably shouldn't need to ask it", "be on topic because they are objective (rather than subjective shopping questions) requests", "the average times from submission to acceptance/publication for *journal x*? * what are", "x*? (probably shouldn't need to ask it here as this info is widely", "rankings for journals in the field of x? (such info can be found", "shouldn't need to ask it here as this info is widely available) *", "the average review time for *journal x*? * what are the average times", "than subjective shopping questions) requests for information which is highly relevant to academics.", "is widely available) * what is the average review time for *journal x*?", "current (2015) rankings for journals in the field of x? (such info can", "on topic because they are objective (rather than subjective shopping questions) requests for", "can be found for older rankings, but recent info is generaly behind a", "be found for older rankings, but recent info is generaly behind a paywall..." ]
[ "do not understand. I think that shopping questions are essentially of the form:", "material. It was closed as a \"shopping question,\" which I really do not", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47519/22733) is wondering whether there exists any good forum for getting peer feedback", "very different to me, since it's asking whether a rather general sort of", "good forum for getting peer feedback on academic job application material. It was", "this sort; can you tell me which one fits my needs? > >", "of resource (an online peer feedback environment for academics) exists at all. I", "for academics) exists at all. I think this is a good question and", "fits my needs? > > > This seems very different to me, since", "are a whole bunch of academic things of this sort; can you tell", "I really do not understand. I think that shopping questions are essentially of", "feedback environment for academics) exists at all. I think this is a good", "it's asking whether a rather general sort of resource (an online peer feedback", "asking whether a rather general sort of resource (an online peer feedback environment", "application material. It was closed as a \"shopping question,\" which I really do", "really do not understand. I think that shopping questions are essentially of the", "can you tell me which one fits my needs? > > > This", "on academic job application material. It was closed as a \"shopping question,\" which", "that shopping questions are essentially of the form: > > There are a", "to me, since it's asking whether a rather general sort of resource (an", "academic job application material. It was closed as a \"shopping question,\" which I", "peer feedback on academic job application material. It was closed as a \"shopping", "exists any good forum for getting peer feedback on academic job application material.", "think that shopping questions are essentially of the form: > > There are", "form: > > There are a whole bunch of academic things of this", "question,\" which I really do not understand. I think that shopping questions are", "academics) exists at all. I think this is a good question and should", "> > There are a whole bunch of academic things of this sort;", "sort; can you tell me which one fits my needs? > > >", "questions are essentially of the form: > > There are a whole bunch", "bunch of academic things of this sort; can you tell me which one", "whether a rather general sort of resource (an online peer feedback environment for", "I think that shopping questions are essentially of the form: > > There", "any good forum for getting peer feedback on academic job application material. It", "there exists any good forum for getting peer feedback on academic job application", "forum for getting peer feedback on academic job application material. It was closed", "things of this sort; can you tell me which one fits my needs?", "feedback on academic job application material. It was closed as a \"shopping question,\"", "of academic things of this sort; can you tell me which one fits", "was closed as a \"shopping question,\" which I really do not understand. I", "since it's asking whether a rather general sort of resource (an online peer", "whether there exists any good forum for getting peer feedback on academic job", "general sort of resource (an online peer feedback environment for academics) exists at", "job application material. It was closed as a \"shopping question,\" which I really", "understand. I think that shopping questions are essentially of the form: > >", "academic things of this sort; can you tell me which one fits my", "[recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47519/22733) is wondering whether there exists any good forum for getting peer", "rather general sort of resource (an online peer feedback environment for academics) exists", "you tell me which one fits my needs? > > > This seems", "peer feedback environment for academics) exists at all. I think this is a", "sort of resource (an online peer feedback environment for academics) exists at all.", "> > This seems very different to me, since it's asking whether a", "\"shopping question,\" which I really do not understand. I think that shopping questions", "a \"shopping question,\" which I really do not understand. I think that shopping", "the form: > > There are a whole bunch of academic things of", "It was closed as a \"shopping question,\" which I really do not understand.", "> There are a whole bunch of academic things of this sort; can", "different to me, since it's asking whether a rather general sort of resource", "> This seems very different to me, since it's asking whether a rather", "a rather general sort of resource (an online peer feedback environment for academics)", "(an online peer feedback environment for academics) exists at all. I think this", "wondering whether there exists any good forum for getting peer feedback on academic", "are essentially of the form: > > There are a whole bunch of", "a whole bunch of academic things of this sort; can you tell me", "as a \"shopping question,\" which I really do not understand. I think that", "of the form: > > There are a whole bunch of academic things", "at all. I think this is a good question and should be reopened.", "environment for academics) exists at all. I think this is a good question", "There are a whole bunch of academic things of this sort; can you", "online peer feedback environment for academics) exists at all. I think this is", "whole bunch of academic things of this sort; can you tell me which", "me which one fits my needs? > > > This seems very different", "seems very different to me, since it's asking whether a rather general sort", "> > > This seems very different to me, since it's asking whether", "is wondering whether there exists any good forum for getting peer feedback on", "of this sort; can you tell me which one fits my needs? >", "This seems very different to me, since it's asking whether a rather general", "which one fits my needs? > > > This seems very different to", "not understand. I think that shopping questions are essentially of the form: >", "for getting peer feedback on academic job application material. It was closed as", "which I really do not understand. I think that shopping questions are essentially", "exists at all. I think this is a good question and should be", "shopping questions are essentially of the form: > > There are a whole", "closed as a \"shopping question,\" which I really do not understand. I think", "resource (an online peer feedback environment for academics) exists at all. I think", "getting peer feedback on academic job application material. It was closed as a", "A [recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47519/22733) is wondering whether there exists any good forum for getting", "needs? > > > This seems very different to me, since it's asking", "my needs? > > > This seems very different to me, since it's", "me, since it's asking whether a rather general sort of resource (an online", "essentially of the form: > > There are a whole bunch of academic", "tell me which one fits my needs? > > > This seems very", "one fits my needs? > > > This seems very different to me," ]
[ "reference request for actual data, potentially related to academia. If anything, it could", "National Merit Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915) was closed. Here's the close reason used. > > \"Shopping\"", "could have been closed as outside the scope, but it still falls within", "this discussion for more information.)\" > > > I'm sure the quote here:", "university? > > > didn't help things, but this appears to have been", "outside the scope, but it still falls within that realm in terms of", "an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion for", "still falls within that realm in terms of academic metrics and statistics. So,", "here: > > Does anybody know of a list (preferably online) of how", "Does anybody know of a list (preferably online) of how many 2013 National", "US National Merit Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915) was closed. Here's the close reason used. > >", "to have been a reference request for actual data, potentially related to academia.", "similar as an answer or seek an assessment or comparison of such, are", "more information.)\" > > > I'm sure the quote here: > > Does", "online) of how many 2013 National Merit Scholars attended each university? > >", "within that realm in terms of academic metrics and statistics. So, how exactly", "unsure why this question: [List of 2013 US National Merit Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915) was closed.", "So, how exactly was this defined as a \"shopping\" question as opposed to", "2013 National Merit Scholars attended each university? > > > didn't help things,", "it could have been closed as outside the scope, but it still falls", "the scope, but it still falls within that realm in terms of academic", "\"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers,", "a reference request for actual data, potentially related to academia. If anything, it", "> \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs,", "questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals,", "or comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion for more information.)\"", "this question: [List of 2013 US National Merit Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915) was closed. Here's the", "2013 US National Merit Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915) was closed. Here's the close reason used. >", "or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar", "universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar as an answer or", "appears to have been a reference request for actual data, potentially related to", "scope, but it still falls within that realm in terms of academic metrics", "closed as outside the scope, but it still falls within that realm in", "it still falls within that realm in terms of academic metrics and statistics.", "exactly was this defined as a \"shopping\" question as opposed to a reference", "used. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities,", "anybody know of a list (preferably online) of how many 2013 National Merit", "recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or", "a list (preferably online) of how many 2013 National Merit Scholars attended each", "as outside the scope, but it still falls within that realm in terms", "in terms of academic metrics and statistics. So, how exactly was this defined", "to academia. If anything, it could have been closed as outside the scope,", "sure the quote here: > > Does anybody know of a list (preferably", "are off-topic here. (See this discussion for more information.)\" > > > I'm", "such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion for more information.)\" > > >", "data, potentially related to academia. If anything, it could have been closed as", "of academic metrics and statistics. So, how exactly was this defined as a", "> > I'm sure the quote here: > > Does anybody know of", "of how many 2013 National Merit Scholars attended each university? > > >", "National Merit Scholars attended each university? > > > didn't help things, but", "> > > I'm sure the quote here: > > Does anybody know", "request for actual data, potentially related to academia. If anything, it could have", "didn't help things, but this appears to have been a reference request for", "falls within that realm in terms of academic metrics and statistics. So, how", "have been a reference request for actual data, potentially related to academia. If", "of 2013 US National Merit Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915) was closed. Here's the close reason used.", "actual data, potentially related to academia. If anything, it could have been closed", "that realm in terms of academic metrics and statistics. So, how exactly was", "the close reason used. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists", "I'm sure the quote here: > > Does anybody know of a list", "answer or seek an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See", "closed. Here's the close reason used. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations", "metrics and statistics. So, how exactly was this defined as a \"shopping\" question", "academia. If anything, it could have been closed as outside the scope, but", "individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar as an answer", "as an answer or seek an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic", "but this appears to have been a reference request for actual data, potentially", "related to academia. If anything, it could have been closed as outside the", "comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion for more information.)\" >", "potentially related to academia. If anything, it could have been closed as outside", "was closed. Here's the close reason used. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek", "question: [List of 2013 US National Merit Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915) was closed. Here's the close", "have been closed as outside the scope, but it still falls within that", "Merit Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915) was closed. Here's the close reason used. > > \"Shopping\" questions,", "If anything, it could have been closed as outside the scope, but it", "close reason used. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of", "(See this discussion for more information.)\" > > > I'm sure the quote", "publishers, journals, research topics or similar as an answer or seek an assessment", "know of a list (preferably online) of how many 2013 National Merit Scholars", "seek an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion", "here. (See this discussion for more information.)\" > > > I'm sure the", "Merit Scholars attended each university? > > > didn't help things, but this", "of such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion for more information.)\" > >", "realm in terms of academic metrics and statistics. So, how exactly was this", "[List of 2013 US National Merit Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915) was closed. Here's the close reason", "an answer or seek an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here.", "how exactly was this defined as a \"shopping\" question as opposed to a", "> > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic", "and statistics. So, how exactly was this defined as a \"shopping\" question as", "am still unsure why this question: [List of 2013 US National Merit Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915)", "this appears to have been a reference request for actual data, potentially related", "of a list (preferably online) of how many 2013 National Merit Scholars attended", "quote here: > > Does anybody know of a list (preferably online) of", "academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar as an answer or seek", "discussion for more information.)\" > > > I'm sure the quote here: >", "Here's the close reason used. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or", "how many 2013 National Merit Scholars attended each university? > > > didn't", "which seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research", "> didn't help things, but this appears to have been a reference request", "been closed as outside the scope, but it still falls within that realm", "attended each university? > > > didn't help things, but this appears to", "terms of academic metrics and statistics. So, how exactly was this defined as", "still unsure why this question: [List of 2013 US National Merit Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915) was", "why this question: [List of 2013 US National Merit Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915) was closed. Here's", "journals, research topics or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or", "Scholars attended each university? > > > didn't help things, but this appears", "assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this discussion for more", "the quote here: > > Does anybody know of a list (preferably online)", "each university? > > > didn't help things, but this appears to have", "I am still unsure why this question: [List of 2013 US National Merit", "been a reference request for actual data, potentially related to academia. If anything,", "lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar as", "programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar as an answer or seek an", "seek recommendations or lists of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics", "of individual universities, academic programs, publishers, journals, research topics or similar as an", "topics or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or comparison of", "for more information.)\" > > > I'm sure the quote here: > >", "help things, but this appears to have been a reference request for actual", "or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or comparison of such,", "list (preferably online) of how many 2013 National Merit Scholars attended each university?", "Scholars](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/46914/list-of-2013-national-merit-scholars/46915#46915) was closed. Here's the close reason used. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which", "things, but this appears to have been a reference request for actual data,", "academic metrics and statistics. So, how exactly was this defined as a \"shopping\"", "information.)\" > > > I'm sure the quote here: > > Does anybody", "anything, it could have been closed as outside the scope, but it still", "off-topic here. (See this discussion for more information.)\" > > > I'm sure", "statistics. So, how exactly was this defined as a \"shopping\" question as opposed", "for actual data, potentially related to academia. If anything, it could have been", "or seek an assessment or comparison of such, are off-topic here. (See this", "> > didn't help things, but this appears to have been a reference", "> > > didn't help things, but this appears to have been a", "(preferably online) of how many 2013 National Merit Scholars attended each university? >", "> > Does anybody know of a list (preferably online) of how many", "reason used. > > \"Shopping\" questions, which seek recommendations or lists of individual", "> I'm sure the quote here: > > Does anybody know of a", "was this defined as a \"shopping\" question as opposed to a reference request?", "research topics or similar as an answer or seek an assessment or comparison", "> Does anybody know of a list (preferably online) of how many 2013", "many 2013 National Merit Scholars attended each university? > > > didn't help", "but it still falls within that realm in terms of academic metrics and" ]
[ "daily life of Academia.SE, I'd propose to open a couple of dedicated chat", "Academia.SE, I'd propose to open a couple of dedicated chat rooms: 1. One", "not used the chat for a long time. Well, maybe it's just me,", "important information about the daily life of Academia.SE, I'd propose to open a", "to whoever designed the chat), and I find it hard to follow the", "me, but I have to admit that I find the SE chat pretty", "annoying from the point of view of the user experience (if it's just", "to follow the threads or even the simplest announcements. To reduce the possibility", "I have to admit that I find the SE chat pretty annoying from", "Max (Hiii Max), and I've not used the chat for a long time.", "I find the SE chat pretty annoying from the point of view of", "used the chat for a long time. Well, maybe it's just me, but", "Well, maybe it's just me, but I have to admit that I find", "To reduce the possibility of overlooking important information about the daily life of", "to open a couple of dedicated chat rooms: 1. One dedicated to discussions", "from the point of view of the user experience (if it's just me,", "long time. Well, maybe it's just me, but I have to admit that", "user experience (if it's just me, apologies to whoever designed the chat), and", "a long time. Well, maybe it's just me, but I have to admit", "of overlooking important information about the daily life of Academia.SE, I'd propose to", "but I have to admit that I find the SE chat pretty annoying", "I'm Max (Hiii Max), and I've not used the chat for a long", "the SE chat pretty annoying from the point of view of the user", "just me, but I have to admit that I find the SE chat", "the user experience (if it's just me, apologies to whoever designed the chat),", "1. One dedicated to discussions and announcements about deleting, closing or reopening questions.", "2. One dedicated to discussions about edits. Would this be feasible and useful?", "to admit that I find the SE chat pretty annoying from the point", "of view of the user experience (if it's just me, apologies to whoever", "follow the threads or even the simplest announcements. To reduce the possibility of", "it's just me, apologies to whoever designed the chat), and I find it", "(Hiii Max), and I've not used the chat for a long time. Well,", "reopening questions. 2. One dedicated to discussions about edits. Would this be feasible", "information about the daily life of Academia.SE, I'd propose to open a couple", "the point of view of the user experience (if it's just me, apologies", "deleting, closing or reopening questions. 2. One dedicated to discussions about edits. Would", "(if it's just me, apologies to whoever designed the chat), and I find", "and I've not used the chat for a long time. Well, maybe it's", "Max), and I've not used the chat for a long time. Well, maybe", "a couple of dedicated chat rooms: 1. One dedicated to discussions and announcements", "reduce the possibility of overlooking important information about the daily life of Academia.SE,", "the threads or even the simplest announcements. To reduce the possibility of overlooking", "SE chat pretty annoying from the point of view of the user experience", "chat pretty annoying from the point of view of the user experience (if", "have to admit that I find the SE chat pretty annoying from the", "experience (if it's just me, apologies to whoever designed the chat), and I", "possibility of overlooking important information about the daily life of Academia.SE, I'd propose", "overlooking important information about the daily life of Academia.SE, I'd propose to open", "view of the user experience (if it's just me, apologies to whoever designed", "the simplest announcements. To reduce the possibility of overlooking important information about the", "I'd propose to open a couple of dedicated chat rooms: 1. One dedicated", "and I find it hard to follow the threads or even the simplest", "open a couple of dedicated chat rooms: 1. One dedicated to discussions and", "discussions and announcements about deleting, closing or reopening questions. 2. One dedicated to", "that I find the SE chat pretty annoying from the point of view", "propose to open a couple of dedicated chat rooms: 1. One dedicated to", "about deleting, closing or reopening questions. 2. One dedicated to discussions about edits.", "find the SE chat pretty annoying from the point of view of the", "life of Academia.SE, I'd propose to open a couple of dedicated chat rooms:", "of the user experience (if it's just me, apologies to whoever designed the", "hard to follow the threads or even the simplest announcements. To reduce the", "closing or reopening questions. 2. One dedicated to discussions about edits. Would this", "of Academia.SE, I'd propose to open a couple of dedicated chat rooms: 1.", "and announcements about deleting, closing or reopening questions. 2. One dedicated to discussions", "pretty annoying from the point of view of the user experience (if it's", "chat rooms: 1. One dedicated to discussions and announcements about deleting, closing or", "for a long time. Well, maybe it's just me, but I have to", "find it hard to follow the threads or even the simplest announcements. To", "I find it hard to follow the threads or even the simplest announcements.", "or reopening questions. 2. One dedicated to discussions about edits. Would this be", "just me, apologies to whoever designed the chat), and I find it hard", "the chat for a long time. Well, maybe it's just me, but I", "threads or even the simplest announcements. To reduce the possibility of overlooking important", "it hard to follow the threads or even the simplest announcements. To reduce", "time. Well, maybe it's just me, but I have to admit that I", "to discussions and announcements about deleting, closing or reopening questions. 2. One dedicated", "apologies to whoever designed the chat), and I find it hard to follow", "I've not used the chat for a long time. Well, maybe it's just", "rooms: 1. One dedicated to discussions and announcements about deleting, closing or reopening", "designed the chat), and I find it hard to follow the threads or", "the daily life of Academia.SE, I'd propose to open a couple of dedicated", "admit that I find the SE chat pretty annoying from the point of", "maybe it's just me, but I have to admit that I find the", "dedicated to discussions and announcements about deleting, closing or reopening questions. 2. One", "couple of dedicated chat rooms: 1. One dedicated to discussions and announcements about", "questions. 2. One dedicated to discussions about edits. Would this be feasible and", "point of view of the user experience (if it's just me, apologies to", "announcements. To reduce the possibility of overlooking important information about the daily life", "the possibility of overlooking important information about the daily life of Academia.SE, I'd", "me, apologies to whoever designed the chat), and I find it hard to", "it's just me, but I have to admit that I find the SE", "or even the simplest announcements. To reduce the possibility of overlooking important information", "chat), and I find it hard to follow the threads or even the", "whoever designed the chat), and I find it hard to follow the threads", "simplest announcements. To reduce the possibility of overlooking important information about the daily", "about the daily life of Academia.SE, I'd propose to open a couple of", "the chat), and I find it hard to follow the threads or even", "dedicated chat rooms: 1. One dedicated to discussions and announcements about deleting, closing", "of dedicated chat rooms: 1. One dedicated to discussions and announcements about deleting,", "chat for a long time. Well, maybe it's just me, but I have", "even the simplest announcements. To reduce the possibility of overlooking important information about", "One dedicated to discussions and announcements about deleting, closing or reopening questions. 2.", "announcements about deleting, closing or reopening questions. 2. One dedicated to discussions about" ]
[ "this is done vote it up and flag the original comment for deletion.", "answer, then once this is done vote it up and flag the original", "like to understand why people do this, whether others feel it is a", "know why this is, but it happens often, and then the comment gets", "happy with that solution, however, because it ends up throwing away the associated", "I'd like to understand why people do this, whether others feel it is", "comments. I don't know why this is, but it happens often, and then", "happens often, and then the comment gets many \"up-votes\" as an \"answer.\" My", "and then the comment gets many \"up-votes\" as an \"answer.\" My approach to", "it ends up throwing away the associated comment-votes. I'd like to understand why", "this site for people to post answers as comments. I don't know why", "noticed a tendency on this site for people to post answers as comments.", "is a recent example (where I haven't flagged for deletion, in support of", "tendency on this site for people to post answers as comments. I don't", "to understand why people do this, whether others feel it is a problem", "understand why people do this, whether others feel it is a problem as", "\"answer.\" My approach to this has been to ask people to convert their", "the associated comment-votes. I'd like to understand why people do this, whether others", "don't know why this is, but it happens often, and then the comment", "of this question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733) I'm not happy with that solution, however, because it ends", "approach to this has been to ask people to convert their comment into", "because it ends up throwing away the associated comment-votes. I'd like to understand", "I have noticed a tendency on this site for people to post answers", "has been to ask people to convert their comment into an answer, then", "with that solution, however, because it ends up throwing away the associated comment-votes.", "throwing away the associated comment-votes. I'd like to understand why people do this,", "that solution, however, because it ends up throwing away the associated comment-votes. I'd", "I haven't flagged for deletion, in support of this question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733) I'm not happy", "this is, but it happens often, and then the comment gets many \"up-votes\"", "a recent example (where I haven't flagged for deletion, in support of this", "an answer, then once this is done vote it up and flag the", "then once this is done vote it up and flag the original comment", "up and flag the original comment for deletion. [Here is a recent example", "an \"answer.\" My approach to this has been to ask people to convert", "answers as comments. I don't know why this is, but it happens often,", "feel it is a problem as well, and if so, is there a", "but it happens often, and then the comment gets many \"up-votes\" as an", "on this site for people to post answers as comments. I don't know", "once this is done vote it up and flag the original comment for", "people do this, whether others feel it is a problem as well, and", "it up and flag the original comment for deletion. [Here is a recent", "a tendency on this site for people to post answers as comments. I", "is, but it happens often, and then the comment gets many \"up-votes\" as", "many \"up-votes\" as an \"answer.\" My approach to this has been to ask", "for people to post answers as comments. I don't know why this is,", "is a problem as well, and if so, is there a better way", "gets many \"up-votes\" as an \"answer.\" My approach to this has been to", "for deletion, in support of this question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733) I'm not happy with that solution,", "\"up-votes\" as an \"answer.\" My approach to this has been to ask people", "problem as well, and if so, is there a better way to handle", "vote it up and flag the original comment for deletion. [Here is a", "and flag the original comment for deletion. [Here is a recent example (where", "not happy with that solution, however, because it ends up throwing away the", "haven't flagged for deletion, in support of this question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733) I'm not happy with", "whether others feel it is a problem as well, and if so, is", "have noticed a tendency on this site for people to post answers as", "original comment for deletion. [Here is a recent example (where I haven't flagged", "a problem as well, and if so, is there a better way to", "the comment gets many \"up-votes\" as an \"answer.\" My approach to this has", "others feel it is a problem as well, and if so, is there", "up throwing away the associated comment-votes. I'd like to understand why people do", "comment gets many \"up-votes\" as an \"answer.\" My approach to this has been", "comment-votes. I'd like to understand why people do this, whether others feel it", "to ask people to convert their comment into an answer, then once this", "support of this question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733) I'm not happy with that solution, however, because it", "ask people to convert their comment into an answer, then once this is", "then the comment gets many \"up-votes\" as an \"answer.\" My approach to this", "their comment into an answer, then once this is done vote it up", "the original comment for deletion. [Here is a recent example (where I haven't", "as an \"answer.\" My approach to this has been to ask people to", "why this is, but it happens often, and then the comment gets many", "post answers as comments. I don't know why this is, but it happens", "recent example (where I haven't flagged for deletion, in support of this question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733)", "to convert their comment into an answer, then once this is done vote", "as well, and if so, is there a better way to handle it?", "question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733) I'm not happy with that solution, however, because it ends up throwing", "do this, whether others feel it is a problem as well, and if", "as comments. I don't know why this is, but it happens often, and", "to post answers as comments. I don't know why this is, but it", "been to ask people to convert their comment into an answer, then once", "into an answer, then once this is done vote it up and flag", "(where I haven't flagged for deletion, in support of this question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733) I'm not", "solution, however, because it ends up throwing away the associated comment-votes. I'd like", "[Here is a recent example (where I haven't flagged for deletion, in support", "people to convert their comment into an answer, then once this is done", "comment for deletion. [Here is a recent example (where I haven't flagged for", "My approach to this has been to ask people to convert their comment", "associated comment-votes. I'd like to understand why people do this, whether others feel", "this has been to ask people to convert their comment into an answer,", "done vote it up and flag the original comment for deletion. [Here is", "convert their comment into an answer, then once this is done vote it", "however, because it ends up throwing away the associated comment-votes. I'd like to", "flag the original comment for deletion. [Here is a recent example (where I", "often, and then the comment gets many \"up-votes\" as an \"answer.\" My approach", "I don't know why this is, but it happens often, and then the", "it is a problem as well, and if so, is there a better", "example (where I haven't flagged for deletion, in support of this question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733) I'm", "comment into an answer, then once this is done vote it up and", "this question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733) I'm not happy with that solution, however, because it ends up", "flagged for deletion, in support of this question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733) I'm not happy with that", "in support of this question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733) I'm not happy with that solution, however, because", "deletion. [Here is a recent example (where I haven't flagged for deletion, in", "for deletion. [Here is a recent example (where I haven't flagged for deletion,", "ends up throwing away the associated comment-votes. I'd like to understand why people", "is done vote it up and flag the original comment for deletion. [Here", "deletion, in support of this question).](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48207/22733) I'm not happy with that solution, however,", "site for people to post answers as comments. I don't know why this", "why people do this, whether others feel it is a problem as well,", "people to post answers as comments. I don't know why this is, but", "to this has been to ask people to convert their comment into an", "away the associated comment-votes. I'd like to understand why people do this, whether", "it happens often, and then the comment gets many \"up-votes\" as an \"answer.\"", "I'm not happy with that solution, however, because it ends up throwing away", "this, whether others feel it is a problem as well, and if so," ]
[ "\"StrongBad\" later wrote this about that flag: > > We saw the flag,", "very short. It said this: > > Dr. Beale, > > > You", "be dealt with? **PS:** I now find a moderator mistakenly informing me in", "besides the fact that he didn't like an opinion I expressed in a", "is about as rude as people ever get, with no apparent motive besides", "the words I attribute to him or her above: \"I am sure they", "ad hominem attack against me in extraordinarily rude language in comments under a", "and \"harrassing\" correctly describe what he did, quoted above. \"StrongBad\" wrote the words", "stalking and harrassing me and had posted an irrational and dishonest ad hominem", "I expressed in a DIFFERENT question on a DIFFERENT topic. And it referred", "it referred to a question in which I made no attempt to defend", "\"stalking and harrassing\" him. \"Stalking\" and \"harrassing\" correctly describe what he did, quoted", "he did, quoted above. \"StrongBad\" wrote the words I attribute to him or", "motive besides the fact that he didn't like an opinion I expressed in", "is, I did so exactly once, on May 18, 2015, and the email", "the StackExchange format. – jakebeal May 18 at 5:12 > > > That", "I did so exactly once, on May 18, 2015, and the email was", "\"Stalking\" and \"harrassing\" correctly describe what he did, quoted above. \"StrongBad\" wrote the", "this answer: > > > [Should one down-vote a question because one disagrees", "and dishonest ad hominem attack against me in extraordinarily rude language in comments", "question on a DIFFERENT topic. And it referred to a question in which", "a message saying essentially \"give us some time\". The SE employees are busy,", "expressed in a DIFFERENT question on a DIFFERENT topic. And it referred to", "mathematical fraud? Because it sure sounds like it, and you're ranting in the", "dealt with? **PS:** I now find a moderator mistakenly informing me in comments", "because one disagrees with the questioner's views expressed on a past occasion not", "\"ranting\" but I was only asking for advice about where to publish it.", "but I am sure they will get to the issue. > > >", "[Should one down-vote a question because one disagrees with the questioner's views expressed", "attack against me in extraordinarily rude language in comments under a question. The", "that flag: > > We saw the flag, discussed it amongst ourselves and", "understand this answer: > > > [Should one down-vote a question because one", "defend the opinion he considered \"ranting\" but I was only asking for advice", "my entire and only email to him. It apparently inspired him to complain", "when the flag was cleared, you received a message saying essentially \"give us", "We decided that it would be best if an SE employee handled the", "discussed it amongst ourselves and the SE employees. We decided that it would", "us note Jake Beale's words: > > @MichaelHardy Is this about your same", "to him or her above: \"I am sure they will get to the", "one point I was told I should not contact Jake Beale by email.", "did, quoted above. \"StrongBad\" wrote the words I attribute to him or her", "words I attribute to him or her above: \"I am sure they will", "considered the question \"ranting\". At one point I was told I should not", "this: > > Dr. Beale, > > > You need to understand this", "saw the flag, discussed it amongst ourselves and the SE employees. We decided", "question because one disagrees with the questioner's views expressed on a past occasion", "point I was told I should not contact Jake Beale by email. The", "sure they will get to the issue. > > > I haven't heard", "it would be best if an SE employee handled the issue. I believe", "fraud? Because it sure sounds like it, and you're ranting in the comments", "rather than trying to shoehorn them into the StackExchange format. – jakebeal May", "that I was \"stalking and harrassing\" him. \"Stalking\" and \"harrassing\" correctly describe what", "it. Nonetheless he considered the question \"ranting\". At one point I was told", "not mentioned in the question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698) > > > That was my entire and", "the SE employees. We decided that it would be best if an SE", "correctly describe what he did, quoted above. \"StrongBad\" wrote the words I attribute", "a DIFFERENT question on a DIFFERENT topic. And it referred to a question", "opinion he considered \"ranting\" but I was only asking for advice about where", "heard from them. Will the matter be dealt with? **PS:** I now find", "us some time\". The SE employees are busy, but I am sure they", "format. – jakebeal May 18 at 5:12 > > > That is about", "your same rant on mathematical fraud? Because it sure sounds like it, and", "18 at 5:12 > > > That is about as rude as people", "> > > You need to understand this answer: > > > [Should", "fact is, I did so exactly once, on May 18, 2015, and the", "no apparent motive besides the fact that he didn't like an opinion I", "should not contact Jake Beale by email. The fact is, I did so", "fact that he didn't like an opinion I expressed in a DIFFERENT question", "had posted an irrational and dishonest ad hominem attack against me in extraordinarily", "need to understand this answer: > > > [Should one down-vote a question", "other means to contact the moderators besides posting this present question. That same", "> > I haven't heard anything from them. Let us note Jake Beale's", "essentially \"give us some time\". The SE employees are busy, but I am", "with? **PS:** I now find a moderator mistakenly informing me in comments below", "The fact is, I did so exactly once, on May 18, 2015, and", "> > Dr. Beale, > > > You need to understand this answer:", "under a question. The user called \"StrongBad\" later wrote this about that flag:", "flag, discussed it amongst ourselves and the SE employees. We decided that it", "sounds like it, and you're ranting in the comments again as well. Please", "We saw the flag, discussed it amongst ourselves and the SE employees. We", "the issue. I believe when the flag was cleared, you received a message", "posted an irrational and dishonest ad hominem attack against me in extraordinarily rude", "SE employees are busy, but I am sure they will get to the", "a question in which I made no attempt to defend the opinion he", "comments under a question. The user called \"StrongBad\" later wrote this about that", "and the email was polite and very short. It said this: > >", "with the questioner's views expressed on a past occasion not mentioned in the", "to complain to moderators that I was \"stalking and harrassing\" him. \"Stalking\" and", "and the SE employees. We decided that it would be best if an", "from them. Let us note Jake Beale's words: > > @MichaelHardy Is this", "opinion I expressed in a DIFFERENT question on a DIFFERENT topic. And it", "the opinion he considered \"ranting\" but I was only asking for advice about", "apparent motive besides the fact that he didn't like an opinion I expressed", "I was told I should not contact Jake Beale by email. The fact", "past occasion not mentioned in the question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698) > > > That was my", "\"give us some time\". The SE employees are busy, but I am sure", "her above: \"I am sure they will get to the issue\". I haven't", "to the issue. > > > I haven't heard anything from them. Let", "that it would be best if an SE employee handled the issue. I", "to him. It apparently inspired him to complain to moderators that I was", "where to publish it. Nonetheless he considered the question \"ranting\". At one point", "complain to moderators that I was \"stalking and harrassing\" him. \"Stalking\" and \"harrassing\"", "against me in extraordinarily rude language in comments under a question. The user", "long-form format rather than trying to shoehorn them into the StackExchange format. –", "inspired him to complain to moderators that I was \"stalking and harrassing\" him.", "moderator mistakenly informing me in comments below that I had some other means", "> I haven't heard anything from them. Let us note Jake Beale's words:", "dishonest ad hominem attack against me in extraordinarily rude language in comments under", "> > You need to understand this answer: > > > [Should one", "but I was only asking for advice about where to publish it. Nonetheless", "in the question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698) > > > That was my entire and only email", "a question. The user called \"StrongBad\" later wrote this about that flag: >", "and harrassing\" him. \"Stalking\" and \"harrassing\" correctly describe what he did, quoted above.", "and explained that he had been stalking and harrassing me and had posted", "Beale's words: > > @MichaelHardy Is this about your same rant on mathematical", "was \"stalking and harrassing\" him. \"Stalking\" and \"harrassing\" correctly describe what he did,", "mistakenly informing me in comments below that I had some other means to", "topic. And it referred to a question in which I made no attempt", "I am sure they will get to the issue. > > > I", "May 18 at 5:12 > > > That is about as rude as", "flag: > > We saw the flag, discussed it amongst ourselves and the", "email was polite and very short. It said this: > > Dr. Beale,", "> That is about as rude as people ever get, with no apparent", "jakebeal May 18 at 5:12 > > > That is about as rude", "asking for advice about where to publish it. Nonetheless he considered the question", "rude as people ever get, with no apparent motive besides the fact that", "which I made no attempt to defend the opinion he considered \"ranting\" but", "on a DIFFERENT topic. And it referred to a question in which I", "extraordinarily rude language in comments under a question. The user called \"StrongBad\" later", "I should not contact Jake Beale by email. The fact is, I did", "said this: > > Dr. Beale, > > > You need to understand", "flag was cleared, you received a message saying essentially \"give us some time\".", "I was \"stalking and harrassing\" him. \"Stalking\" and \"harrassing\" correctly describe what he", "> > > I haven't heard anything from them. Let us note Jake", "besides posting this present question. That same moderator earlier actually recommended posting here", "me in comments below that I had some other means to contact the", "I believe when the flag was cleared, you received a message saying essentially", "your views in a clear long-form format rather than trying to shoehorn them", "had been stalking and harrassing me and had posted an irrational and dishonest", "set yourself up a blog or something where you can explain your views", "mentioned in the question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698) > > > That was my entire and only", "flagged a posted by Dr. Jake Beale and explained that he had been", "later wrote this about that flag: > > We saw the flag, discussed", "in which I made no attempt to defend the opinion he considered \"ranting\"", "in a clear long-form format rather than trying to shoehorn them into the", "views in a clear long-form format rather than trying to shoehorn them into", "employees. We decided that it would be best if an SE employee handled", "them. Will the matter be dealt with? **PS:** I now find a moderator", "them into the StackExchange format. – jakebeal May 18 at 5:12 > >", "sure they will get to the issue\". I haven't heard from them. Will", "are busy, but I am sure they will get to the issue. >", "\"harrassing\" correctly describe what he did, quoted above. \"StrongBad\" wrote the words I", "clear long-form format rather than trying to shoehorn them into the StackExchange format.", "if an SE employee handled the issue. I believe when the flag was", "rant on mathematical fraud? Because it sure sounds like it, and you're ranting", "would be best if an SE employee handled the issue. I believe when", "May 18, 2015, and the email was polite and very short. It said", "advice about where to publish it. Nonetheless he considered the question \"ranting\". At", "get to the issue. > > > I haven't heard anything from them.", "didn't like an opinion I expressed in a DIFFERENT question on a DIFFERENT", "him to complain to moderators that I was \"stalking and harrassing\" him. \"Stalking\"", "issue\". I haven't heard from them. Will the matter be dealt with? **PS:**", "get, with no apparent motive besides the fact that he didn't like an", "Will the matter be dealt with? **PS:** I now find a moderator mistakenly", "considered \"ranting\" but I was only asking for advice about where to publish", "> You need to understand this answer: > > > [Should one down-vote", "That is about as rude as people ever get, with no apparent motive", "a past occasion not mentioned in the question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698) > > > That was", "to contact the moderators besides posting this present question. That same moderator earlier", "busy, but I am sure they will get to the issue. > >", "told I should not contact Jake Beale by email. The fact is, I", "be best if an SE employee handled the issue. I believe when the", "describe what he did, quoted above. \"StrongBad\" wrote the words I attribute to", "on mathematical fraud? Because it sure sounds like it, and you're ranting in", "I attribute to him or her above: \"I am sure they will get", "SE employees. We decided that it would be best if an SE employee", "to a question in which I made no attempt to defend the opinion", "you received a message saying essentially \"give us some time\". The SE employees", "posting this present question. That same moderator earlier actually recommended posting here as", "rude language in comments under a question. The user called \"StrongBad\" later wrote", "the moderators besides posting this present question. That same moderator earlier actually recommended", "believe when the flag was cleared, you received a message saying essentially \"give", "the question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698) > > > That was my entire and only email to", "will get to the issue. > > > I haven't heard anything from", "questioner's views expressed on a past occasion not mentioned in the question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698) >", "the matter be dealt with? **PS:** I now find a moderator mistakenly informing", "explained that he had been stalking and harrassing me and had posted an", "anything from them. Let us note Jake Beale's words: > > @MichaelHardy Is", "expressed on a past occasion not mentioned in the question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698) > > >", "it, and you're ranting in the comments again as well. Please go set", "views expressed on a past occasion not mentioned in the question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698) > >", "exactly once, on May 18, 2015, and the email was polite and very", "and only email to him. It apparently inspired him to complain to moderators", "> > @MichaelHardy Is this about your same rant on mathematical fraud? Because", "me and had posted an irrational and dishonest ad hominem attack against me", "in the comments again as well. Please go set yourself up a blog", "a clear long-form format rather than trying to shoehorn them into the StackExchange", "harrassing\" him. \"Stalking\" and \"harrassing\" correctly describe what he did, quoted above. \"StrongBad\"", "him or her above: \"I am sure they will get to the issue\".", "the question \"ranting\". At one point I was told I should not contact", "had some other means to contact the moderators besides posting this present question.", "so exactly once, on May 18, 2015, and the email was polite and", "not contact Jake Beale by email. The fact is, I did so exactly", "Let us note Jake Beale's words: > > @MichaelHardy Is this about your", "a question because one disagrees with the questioner's views expressed on a past", "it amongst ourselves and the SE employees. We decided that it would be", "saying essentially \"give us some time\". The SE employees are busy, but I", "an opinion I expressed in a DIFFERENT question on a DIFFERENT topic. And", "by email. The fact is, I did so exactly once, on May 18,", "this present question. That same moderator earlier actually recommended posting here as a", "amongst ourselves and the SE employees. We decided that it would be best", "present question. That same moderator earlier actually recommended posting here as a way", "\"ranting\". At one point I was told I should not contact Jake Beale", "At one point I was told I should not contact Jake Beale by", "Because it sure sounds like it, and you're ranting in the comments again", "user called \"StrongBad\" later wrote this about that flag: > > We saw", "question. That same moderator earlier actually recommended posting here as a way of", "go set yourself up a blog or something where you can explain your", "like it, and you're ranting in the comments again as well. Please go", "him. It apparently inspired him to complain to moderators that I was \"stalking", "am sure they will get to the issue. > > > I haven't", "comments again as well. Please go set yourself up a blog or something", "above. \"StrongBad\" wrote the words I attribute to him or her above: \"I", "disagrees with the questioner's views expressed on a past occasion not mentioned in", "> Dr. Beale, > > > You need to understand this answer: >", "ourselves and the SE employees. We decided that it would be best if", "get to the issue\". I haven't heard from them. Will the matter be", "in comments under a question. The user called \"StrongBad\" later wrote this about", "something where you can explain your views in a clear long-form format rather", "words: > > @MichaelHardy Is this about your same rant on mathematical fraud?", "trying to shoehorn them into the StackExchange format. – jakebeal May 18 at", "Jake Beale by email. The fact is, I did so exactly once, on", "find a moderator mistakenly informing me in comments below that I had some", "heard anything from them. Let us note Jake Beale's words: > > @MichaelHardy", "he had been stalking and harrassing me and had posted an irrational and", "was cleared, you received a message saying essentially \"give us some time\". The", "SE employee handled the issue. I believe when the flag was cleared, you", "Is this about your same rant on mathematical fraud? Because it sure sounds", "Jake Beale and explained that he had been stalking and harrassing me and", "email. The fact is, I did so exactly once, on May 18, 2015,", "that he didn't like an opinion I expressed in a DIFFERENT question on", "ever get, with no apparent motive besides the fact that he didn't like", "to moderators that I was \"stalking and harrassing\" him. \"Stalking\" and \"harrassing\" correctly", "note Jake Beale's words: > > @MichaelHardy Is this about your same rant", "Beale, > > > You need to understand this answer: > > >", "was told I should not contact Jake Beale by email. The fact is,", "attempt to defend the opinion he considered \"ranting\" but I was only asking", "it sure sounds like it, and you're ranting in the comments again as", "them. Let us note Jake Beale's words: > > @MichaelHardy Is this about", "he considered the question \"ranting\". At one point I was told I should", "quoted above. \"StrongBad\" wrote the words I attribute to him or her above:", "the flag, discussed it amongst ourselves and the SE employees. We decided that", "will get to the issue\". I haven't heard from them. Will the matter", "than trying to shoehorn them into the StackExchange format. – jakebeal May 18", "Please go set yourself up a blog or something where you can explain", "publish it. Nonetheless he considered the question \"ranting\". At one point I was", "The user called \"StrongBad\" later wrote this about that flag: > > We", "to understand this answer: > > > [Should one down-vote a question because", "they will get to the issue. > > > I haven't heard anything", "occasion not mentioned in the question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698) > > > That was my entire", "some other means to contact the moderators besides posting this present question. That", "about where to publish it. Nonetheless he considered the question \"ranting\". At one", "to publish it. Nonetheless he considered the question \"ranting\". At one point I", "\"I am sure they will get to the issue\". I haven't heard from", "and very short. It said this: > > Dr. Beale, > > >", "referred to a question in which I made no attempt to defend the", "handled the issue. I believe when the flag was cleared, you received a", "message saying essentially \"give us some time\". The SE employees are busy, but", "blog or something where you can explain your views in a clear long-form", "explain your views in a clear long-form format rather than trying to shoehorn", "I had some other means to contact the moderators besides posting this present", "now find a moderator mistakenly informing me in comments below that I had", "@MichaelHardy Is this about your same rant on mathematical fraud? Because it sure", "a month ago I flagged a posted by Dr. Jake Beale and explained", "haven't heard from them. Will the matter be dealt with? **PS:** I now", "from them. Will the matter be dealt with? **PS:** I now find a", "informing me in comments below that I had some other means to contact", "again as well. Please go set yourself up a blog or something where", "email to him. It apparently inspired him to complain to moderators that I", "hominem attack against me in extraordinarily rude language in comments under a question.", "I now find a moderator mistakenly informing me in comments below that I", "been stalking and harrassing me and had posted an irrational and dishonest ad", "> That was my entire and only email to him. It apparently inspired", "wrote this about that flag: > > We saw the flag, discussed it", "> [Should one down-vote a question because one disagrees with the questioner's views", "no attempt to defend the opinion he considered \"ranting\" but I was only", "about that flag: > > We saw the flag, discussed it amongst ourselves", "> > We saw the flag, discussed it amongst ourselves and the SE", "format rather than trying to shoehorn them into the StackExchange format. – jakebeal", "into the StackExchange format. – jakebeal May 18 at 5:12 > > >", "the flag was cleared, you received a message saying essentially \"give us some", "in comments below that I had some other means to contact the moderators", "comments below that I had some other means to contact the moderators besides", "entire and only email to him. It apparently inspired him to complain to", "And it referred to a question in which I made no attempt to", "shoehorn them into the StackExchange format. – jakebeal May 18 at 5:12 >", "to the issue\". I haven't heard from them. Will the matter be dealt", "the email was polite and very short. It said this: > > Dr.", "DIFFERENT topic. And it referred to a question in which I made no", "language in comments under a question. The user called \"StrongBad\" later wrote this", "employee handled the issue. I believe when the flag was cleared, you received", "ago I flagged a posted by Dr. Jake Beale and explained that he", "yourself up a blog or something where you can explain your views in", "question in which I made no attempt to defend the opinion he considered", "Jake Beale's words: > > @MichaelHardy Is this about your same rant on", "some time\". The SE employees are busy, but I am sure they will", "he considered \"ranting\" but I was only asking for advice about where to", "that I had some other means to contact the moderators besides posting this", "was polite and very short. It said this: > > Dr. Beale, >", "you're ranting in the comments again as well. Please go set yourself up", "the questioner's views expressed on a past occasion not mentioned in the question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698)", "by Dr. Jake Beale and explained that he had been stalking and harrassing", "that he had been stalking and harrassing me and had posted an irrational", "attribute to him or her above: \"I am sure they will get to", "an irrational and dishonest ad hominem attack against me in extraordinarily rude language", "haven't heard anything from them. Let us note Jake Beale's words: > >", "for advice about where to publish it. Nonetheless he considered the question \"ranting\".", "Beale by email. The fact is, I did so exactly once, on May", "moderator earlier actually recommended posting here as a way of contacting the moderators.", "what he did, quoted above. \"StrongBad\" wrote the words I attribute to him", "the comments again as well. Please go set yourself up a blog or", "posted by Dr. Jake Beale and explained that he had been stalking and", "an SE employee handled the issue. I believe when the flag was cleared,", "I flagged a posted by Dr. Jake Beale and explained that he had", "as rude as people ever get, with no apparent motive besides the fact", "and harrassing me and had posted an irrational and dishonest ad hominem attack", "well. Please go set yourself up a blog or something where you can", "issue. > > > I haven't heard anything from them. Let us note", "– jakebeal May 18 at 5:12 > > > That is about as", "him. \"Stalking\" and \"harrassing\" correctly describe what he did, quoted above. \"StrongBad\" wrote", "means to contact the moderators besides posting this present question. That same moderator", "where you can explain your views in a clear long-form format rather than", "irrational and dishonest ad hominem attack against me in extraordinarily rude language in", "18, 2015, and the email was polite and very short. It said this:", "That same moderator earlier actually recommended posting here as a way of contacting", "I was only asking for advice about where to publish it. Nonetheless he", "was my entire and only email to him. It apparently inspired him to", "people ever get, with no apparent motive besides the fact that he didn't", "they will get to the issue\". I haven't heard from them. Will the", "harrassing me and had posted an irrational and dishonest ad hominem attack against", "ranting in the comments again as well. Please go set yourself up a", "wrote the words I attribute to him or her above: \"I am sure", "moderators besides posting this present question. That same moderator earlier actually recommended posting", "> We saw the flag, discussed it amongst ourselves and the SE employees.", "a blog or something where you can explain your views in a clear", "issue. I believe when the flag was cleared, you received a message saying", "as well. Please go set yourself up a blog or something where you", "answer: > > > [Should one down-vote a question because one disagrees with", "at 5:12 > > > That is about as rude as people ever", "Beale and explained that he had been stalking and harrassing me and had", "> > > [Should one down-vote a question because one disagrees with the", "> > That was my entire and only email to him. It apparently", "and had posted an irrational and dishonest ad hominem attack against me in", "I haven't heard anything from them. Let us note Jake Beale's words: >", "below that I had some other means to contact the moderators besides posting", "this about that flag: > > We saw the flag, discussed it amongst", "> @MichaelHardy Is this about your same rant on mathematical fraud? Because it", "received a message saying essentially \"give us some time\". The SE employees are", "did so exactly once, on May 18, 2015, and the email was polite", "one disagrees with the questioner's views expressed on a past occasion not mentioned", "can explain your views in a clear long-form format rather than trying to", "question \"ranting\". At one point I was told I should not contact Jake", "down-vote a question because one disagrees with the questioner's views expressed on a", "only asking for advice about where to publish it. Nonetheless he considered the", "to shoehorn them into the StackExchange format. – jakebeal May 18 at 5:12", "on a past occasion not mentioned in the question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698) > > > That", "2015, and the email was polite and very short. It said this: >", "up a blog or something where you can explain your views in a", "about as rude as people ever get, with no apparent motive besides the", "> > > That is about as rude as people ever get, with", "the fact that he didn't like an opinion I expressed in a DIFFERENT", "the issue. > > > I haven't heard anything from them. Let us", "a posted by Dr. Jake Beale and explained that he had been stalking", "in a DIFFERENT question on a DIFFERENT topic. And it referred to a", "polite and very short. It said this: > > Dr. Beale, > >", "made no attempt to defend the opinion he considered \"ranting\" but I was", "question?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/256697/should-one-down-vote-a-question-because-one-disagrees-with-the-questioners-view/256698#256698) > > > That was my entire and only email to him.", "5:12 > > > That is about as rude as people ever get,", "the issue\". I haven't heard from them. Will the matter be dealt with?", "employees are busy, but I am sure they will get to the issue.", "> > [Should one down-vote a question because one disagrees with the questioner's", "or something where you can explain your views in a clear long-form format", "as people ever get, with no apparent motive besides the fact that he", "decided that it would be best if an SE employee handled the issue.", "cleared, you received a message saying essentially \"give us some time\". The SE", "once, on May 18, 2015, and the email was polite and very short.", "best if an SE employee handled the issue. I believe when the flag", "he didn't like an opinion I expressed in a DIFFERENT question on a", "me in extraordinarily rude language in comments under a question. The user called", "You need to understand this answer: > > > [Should one down-vote a", "this about your same rant on mathematical fraud? Because it sure sounds like", "only email to him. It apparently inspired him to complain to moderators that", "called \"StrongBad\" later wrote this about that flag: > > We saw the", "one down-vote a question because one disagrees with the questioner's views expressed on", "and you're ranting in the comments again as well. Please go set yourself", "above: \"I am sure they will get to the issue\". I haven't heard", "time\". The SE employees are busy, but I am sure they will get", "on May 18, 2015, and the email was polite and very short. It", "sure sounds like it, and you're ranting in the comments again as well.", "StackExchange format. – jakebeal May 18 at 5:12 > > > That is", "question. The user called \"StrongBad\" later wrote this about that flag: > >", "Nonetheless he considered the question \"ranting\". At one point I was told I", "It said this: > > Dr. Beale, > > > You need to", "DIFFERENT question on a DIFFERENT topic. And it referred to a question in", "Somewhat over a month ago I flagged a posted by Dr. Jake Beale", "moderators that I was \"stalking and harrassing\" him. \"Stalking\" and \"harrassing\" correctly describe", "over a month ago I flagged a posted by Dr. Jake Beale and", "you can explain your views in a clear long-form format rather than trying", "matter be dealt with? **PS:** I now find a moderator mistakenly informing me", "It apparently inspired him to complain to moderators that I was \"stalking and", "\"StrongBad\" wrote the words I attribute to him or her above: \"I am", "> > > That was my entire and only email to him. It", "am sure they will get to the issue\". I haven't heard from them.", "**PS:** I now find a moderator mistakenly informing me in comments below that", "Dr. Jake Beale and explained that he had been stalking and harrassing me", "a moderator mistakenly informing me in comments below that I had some other", "in extraordinarily rude language in comments under a question. The user called \"StrongBad\"", "short. It said this: > > Dr. Beale, > > > You need", "I made no attempt to defend the opinion he considered \"ranting\" but I", "contact Jake Beale by email. The fact is, I did so exactly once,", "or her above: \"I am sure they will get to the issue\". I", "to defend the opinion he considered \"ranting\" but I was only asking for", "same moderator earlier actually recommended posting here as a way of contacting the", "apparently inspired him to complain to moderators that I was \"stalking and harrassing\"", "a DIFFERENT topic. And it referred to a question in which I made", "like an opinion I expressed in a DIFFERENT question on a DIFFERENT topic.", "was only asking for advice about where to publish it. Nonetheless he considered", "> > That is about as rude as people ever get, with no", "same rant on mathematical fraud? Because it sure sounds like it, and you're", "The SE employees are busy, but I am sure they will get to", "about your same rant on mathematical fraud? Because it sure sounds like it,", "That was my entire and only email to him. It apparently inspired him", "Dr. Beale, > > > You need to understand this answer: > >", "I haven't heard from them. Will the matter be dealt with? **PS:** I", "with no apparent motive besides the fact that he didn't like an opinion", "month ago I flagged a posted by Dr. Jake Beale and explained that", "contact the moderators besides posting this present question. That same moderator earlier actually" ]
[ "has a tag on its meta under which users can propose FAQ topics", "really help users (newly registered or older ones) to get more familiar with", "post) propose them to be tagged with such FAQ tag to make them", "such FAQ tag to make them easier to be found by other users.", "registered or older ones) to get more familiar with site policies and disciplines.", "posts, compared to 17 FAQ posts on [TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) or [Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)). These questions really", "(only 3 posts, compared to 17 FAQ posts on [TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) or [Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)). These", "posts? Do we need a wiki-type answer to this question as a *to-do", "wiki-type answer to this question as a *to-do list* of topics which need", "that it does worth if users find some good questions in meta; (if", "propose them to be tagged with such FAQ tag to make them easier", "do not have many questions under the [FAQ tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) (only 3 posts, compared", "as a *to-do list* of topics which need to be answered in form", "disciplines. What are the characteristics of a good FAQ post? What issues do", "on meta for posts which propose a FAQ issue? Also, I think that", "Or kind of tag on meta for posts which propose a FAQ issue?", "in the current FAQ posts? Do we need a wiki-type answer to this", "and disciplines. What are the characteristics of a good FAQ post? What issues", "ones) to get more familiar with site policies and disciplines. What are the", "a wiki-type answer to this question as a *to-do list* of topics which", "have many questions under the [FAQ tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) (only 3 posts, compared to 17", "to get more familiar with site policies and disciplines. What are the characteristics", "in meta; (if these questions have minimum characteristics of a FAQ post) propose", "good FAQ post? What issues do we need to be covered on this", "find some good questions in meta; (if these questions have minimum characteristics of", "on [TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) or [Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)). These questions really help users (newly registered or older", "a FAQ post) propose them to be tagged with such FAQ tag to", "to 17 FAQ posts on [TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) or [Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)). These questions really help users", "users find some good questions in meta; (if these questions have minimum characteristics", "to be answered in form of FAQ? Or kind of tag on meta", "compared to 17 FAQ posts on [TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) or [Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)). These questions really help", "them easier to be found by other users. As an instance, Mathematics.SX has", "with site policies and disciplines. What are the characteristics of a good FAQ", "*to-do list* of topics which need to be answered in form of FAQ?", "be found by other users. As an instance, Mathematics.SX has a tag on", "a FAQ issue? Also, I think that it does worth if users find", "good questions in meta; (if these questions have minimum characteristics of a FAQ", "of a FAQ post) propose them to be tagged with such FAQ tag", "which need to be answered in form of FAQ? Or kind of tag", "Exchange website, we do not have many questions under the [FAQ tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) (only", "17 FAQ posts on [TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) or [Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)). These questions really help users (newly", "FAQ issue? Also, I think that it does worth if users find some", "tag to make them easier to be found by other users. As an", "as FAQ? What topics are not covered in the current FAQ posts? Do", "we need a wiki-type answer to this question as a *to-do list* of", "tag on meta for posts which propose a FAQ issue? Also, I think", "meta; (if these questions have minimum characteristics of a FAQ post) propose them", "(if these questions have minimum characteristics of a FAQ post) propose them to", "instance, Mathematics.SX has a tag on its meta under which users can propose", "to this question as a *to-do list* of topics which need to be", "which propose a FAQ issue? Also, I think that it does worth if", "under the [FAQ tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) (only 3 posts, compared to 17 FAQ posts on", "are not covered in the current FAQ posts? Do we need a wiki-type", "familiar with site policies and disciplines. What are the characteristics of a good", "easier to be found by other users. As an instance, Mathematics.SX has a", "by other users. As an instance, Mathematics.SX has a tag on its meta", "a tag on its meta under which users can propose FAQ topics called", "form of FAQ? Or kind of tag on meta for posts which propose", "Mathematics.SX has a tag on its meta under which users can propose FAQ", "are the characteristics of a good FAQ post? What issues do we need", "posts which propose a FAQ issue? Also, I think that it does worth", "characteristics of a good FAQ post? What issues do we need to be", "if users find some good questions in meta; (if these questions have minimum", "get more familiar with site policies and disciplines. What are the characteristics of", "[FAQ tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) (only 3 posts, compared to 17 FAQ posts on [TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) or", "post? What issues do we need to be covered on this website as", "a good FAQ post? What issues do we need to be covered on", "website, we do not have many questions under the [FAQ tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) (only 3", "answer to this question as a *to-do list* of topics which need to", "to make them easier to be found by other users. As an instance,", "to be tagged with such FAQ tag to make them easier to be", "this question as a *to-do list* of topics which need to be answered", "some good questions in meta; (if these questions have minimum characteristics of a", "questions under the [FAQ tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) (only 3 posts, compared to 17 FAQ posts", "FAQ? Or kind of tag on meta for posts which propose a FAQ", "does worth if users find some good questions in meta; (if these questions", "topics are not covered in the current FAQ posts? Do we need a", "found by other users. As an instance, Mathematics.SX has a tag on its", "do we need to be covered on this website as FAQ? What topics", "users. As an instance, Mathematics.SX has a tag on its meta under which", "FAQ posts on [TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) or [Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)). These questions really help users (newly registered", "current FAQ posts? Do we need a wiki-type answer to this question as", "propose a FAQ issue? Also, I think that it does worth if users", "have minimum characteristics of a FAQ post) propose them to be tagged with", "questions in meta; (if these questions have minimum characteristics of a FAQ post)", "covered in the current FAQ posts? Do we need a wiki-type answer to", "FAQ posts? Do we need a wiki-type answer to this question as a", "these questions have minimum characteristics of a FAQ post) propose them to be", "Stack Exchange website, we do not have many questions under the [FAQ tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)", "Also, I think that it does worth if users find some good questions", "or [Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)). These questions really help users (newly registered or older ones) to", "policies and disciplines. What are the characteristics of a good FAQ post? What", "we need to be covered on this website as FAQ? What topics are", "other Stack Exchange website, we do not have many questions under the [FAQ", "the characteristics of a good FAQ post? What issues do we need to", "we do not have many questions under the [FAQ tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) (only 3 posts,", "meta for posts which propose a FAQ issue? Also, I think that it", "be tagged with such FAQ tag to make them easier to be found", "it does worth if users find some good questions in meta; (if these", "other users. As an instance, Mathematics.SX has a tag on its meta under", "posts on [TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) or [Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)). These questions really help users (newly registered or", "older ones) to get more familiar with site policies and disciplines. What are", "issue? Also, I think that it does worth if users find some good", "issues do we need to be covered on this website as FAQ? What", "list* of topics which need to be answered in form of FAQ? Or", "more familiar with site policies and disciplines. What are the characteristics of a", "As an instance, Mathematics.SX has a tag on its meta under which users", "FAQ post) propose them to be tagged with such FAQ tag to make", "(newly registered or older ones) to get more familiar with site policies and", "FAQ post? What issues do we need to be covered on this website", "These questions really help users (newly registered or older ones) to get more", "need to be answered in form of FAQ? Or kind of tag on", "in form of FAQ? Or kind of tag on meta for posts which", "an instance, Mathematics.SX has a tag on its meta under which users can", "I think that it does worth if users find some good questions in", "minimum characteristics of a FAQ post) propose them to be tagged with such", "FAQ tag to make them easier to be found by other users. As", "many questions under the [FAQ tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) (only 3 posts, compared to 17 FAQ", "site policies and disciplines. What are the characteristics of a good FAQ post?", "answered in form of FAQ? Or kind of tag on meta for posts", "of a good FAQ post? What issues do we need to be covered", "the [FAQ tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) (only 3 posts, compared to 17 FAQ posts on [TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)", "think that it does worth if users find some good questions in meta;", "tagged with such FAQ tag to make them easier to be found by", "covered on this website as FAQ? What topics are not covered in the", "worth if users find some good questions in meta; (if these questions have", "need to be covered on this website as FAQ? What topics are not", "make them easier to be found by other users. As an instance, Mathematics.SX", "not covered in the current FAQ posts? Do we need a wiki-type answer", "questions have minimum characteristics of a FAQ post) propose them to be tagged", "of FAQ? Or kind of tag on meta for posts which propose a", "them to be tagged with such FAQ tag to make them easier to", "What are the characteristics of a good FAQ post? What issues do we", "be covered on this website as FAQ? What topics are not covered in", "a *to-do list* of topics which need to be answered in form of", "help users (newly registered or older ones) to get more familiar with site", "of topics which need to be answered in form of FAQ? Or kind", "What issues do we need to be covered on this website as FAQ?", "need a wiki-type answer to this question as a *to-do list* of topics", "users (newly registered or older ones) to get more familiar with site policies", "not have many questions under the [FAQ tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) (only 3 posts, compared to", "be answered in form of FAQ? Or kind of tag on meta for", "topics which need to be answered in form of FAQ? Or kind of", "What topics are not covered in the current FAQ posts? Do we need", "to be found by other users. As an instance, Mathematics.SX has a tag", "tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) (only 3 posts, compared to 17 FAQ posts on [TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) or [Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)).", "questions really help users (newly registered or older ones) to get more familiar", "website as FAQ? What topics are not covered in the current FAQ posts?", "[Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)). These questions really help users (newly registered or older ones) to get", "of tag on meta for posts which propose a FAQ issue? Also, I", "question as a *to-do list* of topics which need to be answered in", "with such FAQ tag to make them easier to be found by other", "for posts which propose a FAQ issue? Also, I think that it does", "this website as FAQ? What topics are not covered in the current FAQ", "[TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) or [Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)). These questions really help users (newly registered or older ones)", "kind of tag on meta for posts which propose a FAQ issue? Also,", "to other Stack Exchange website, we do not have many questions under the", "FAQ? What topics are not covered in the current FAQ posts? Do we", "3 posts, compared to 17 FAQ posts on [TeX.SX](https://tex.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq) or [Mathematics.SX](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq)). These questions", "Compared to other Stack Exchange website, we do not have many questions under", "Do we need a wiki-type answer to this question as a *to-do list*", "tag on its meta under which users can propose FAQ topics called [faq-proposed](https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/faq-proposed).", "or older ones) to get more familiar with site policies and disciplines. What", "characteristics of a FAQ post) propose them to be tagged with such FAQ", "on this website as FAQ? What topics are not covered in the current", "to be covered on this website as FAQ? What topics are not covered", "the current FAQ posts? Do we need a wiki-type answer to this question" ]
[ "form turning up on google and similar search engines? I would think that", "be impossible to get it from a google (or similar search engine search)?", "posted in this forum) form turning up on google and similar search engines?", "a general question. How can I avoid an academic question (that I’ve posted", "would think that if I code the text then it would be impossible", "to get it from a google (or similar search engine search)? Thanks for", "the text then it would be impossible to get it from a google", "on google and similar search engines? I would think that if I code", "get it from a google (or similar search engine search)? Thanks for answering.", "that if I code the text then it would be impossible to get", "I code the text then it would be impossible to get it from", "this forum) form turning up on google and similar search engines? I would", "question. How can I avoid an academic question (that I’ve posted in this", "engines? I would think that if I code the text then it would", "I avoid an academic question (that I’ve posted in this forum) form turning", "similar search engines? I would think that if I code the text then", "is just a general question. How can I avoid an academic question (that", "text then it would be impossible to get it from a google (or", "think that if I code the text then it would be impossible to", "academic question (that I’ve posted in this forum) form turning up on google", "general question. How can I avoid an academic question (that I’ve posted in", "(that I’ve posted in this forum) form turning up on google and similar", "up on google and similar search engines? I would think that if I", "just a general question. How can I avoid an academic question (that I’ve", "can I avoid an academic question (that I’ve posted in this forum) form", "This is just a general question. How can I avoid an academic question", "I’ve posted in this forum) form turning up on google and similar search", "How can I avoid an academic question (that I’ve posted in this forum)", "search engines? I would think that if I code the text then it", "it would be impossible to get it from a google (or similar search", "question (that I’ve posted in this forum) form turning up on google and", "I would think that if I code the text then it would be", "avoid an academic question (that I’ve posted in this forum) form turning up", "and similar search engines? I would think that if I code the text", "in this forum) form turning up on google and similar search engines? I", "forum) form turning up on google and similar search engines? I would think", "turning up on google and similar search engines? I would think that if", "if I code the text then it would be impossible to get it", "would be impossible to get it from a google (or similar search engine", "impossible to get it from a google (or similar search engine search)? Thanks", "google and similar search engines? I would think that if I code the", "code the text then it would be impossible to get it from a", "then it would be impossible to get it from a google (or similar", "an academic question (that I’ve posted in this forum) form turning up on" ]
[ "also applies to broad questions. I mean, some questions ask about a list", "or being a shopping question? This also applies to broad questions. I mean,", "a questions is about undergraduates, and at the same time it should be", "it should be closed because of it's content for asking a shopping question.", "a list of relevant websites or journals in an area of science; this", "the reason of being a shopping question. Which reason do you choose to", "For instance, a questions is about undergraduates, and at the same time it", "list of relevant websites or journals in an area of science; this question", "Which reason do you choose to vote to close a question? Being a", "it's content for asking a shopping question. Which one do you choose, being", "are more important to be checked and to be in mind when judging", "a shopping question or being too broad? My question here is, as a", "science; this question may be closed for being too broad or for the", "shopping question? This also applies to broad questions. I mean, some questions ask", "is, as a person deciding to close a question; how do you give", "ask about a list of relevant websites or journals in an area of", "being too broad or for the reason of being a shopping question. Which", "is about undergraduates, and at the same time it should be closed because", "in choosing such reasons? Which reasons are more important to be checked and", "here is, as a person deciding to close a question; how do you", "reasons? Which reasons are more important to be checked and to be in", "closed because of it's content for asking a shopping question. Which one do", "is about undergraduates or being a shopping question? This also applies to broad", "journals in an area of science; this question may be closed for being", "to be checked and to be in mind when judging on-topicness of questions?", "question. Which one do you choose, being off-topic because it is about undergraduates", "of relevant websites or journals in an area of science; this question may", "a shopping question. Which reason do you choose to vote to close a", "content for asking a shopping question. Which one do you choose, being off-topic", "being off-topic because it is about undergraduates or being a shopping question? This", "a question? Being a shopping question or being too broad? My question here", "that some questions should be closed for more than one reason. For instance,", "question. Which reason do you choose to vote to close a question? Being", "undergraduates, and at the same time it should be closed because of it's", "asking a shopping question. Which one do you choose, being off-topic because it", "priority in choosing such reasons? Which reasons are more important to be checked", "choose, being off-topic because it is about undergraduates or being a shopping question?", "be closed because of it's content for asking a shopping question. Which one", "broad questions. I mean, some questions ask about a list of relevant websites", "vote to close a question? Being a shopping question or being too broad?", "may be closed for being too broad or for the reason of being", "person deciding to close a question; how do you give priority in choosing", "questions ask about a list of relevant websites or journals in an area", "and at the same time it should be closed because of it's content", "Which reasons are more important to be checked and to be in mind", "be closed for more than one reason. For instance, a questions is about", "instance, a questions is about undergraduates, and at the same time it should", "how do you give priority in choosing such reasons? Which reasons are more", "you choose, being off-topic because it is about undergraduates or being a shopping", "Academia, it happens that some questions should be closed for more than one", "close a question? Being a shopping question or being too broad? My question", "questions is about undergraduates, and at the same time it should be closed", "to close a question; how do you give priority in choosing such reasons?", "time it should be closed because of it's content for asking a shopping", "important to be checked and to be in mind when judging on-topicness of", "for the reason of being a shopping question. Which reason do you choose", "too broad? My question here is, as a person deciding to close a", "area of science; this question may be closed for being too broad or", "a shopping question. Which one do you choose, being off-topic because it is", "choosing such reasons? Which reasons are more important to be checked and to", "shopping question. Which one do you choose, being off-topic because it is about", "being a shopping question. Which reason do you choose to vote to close", "for more than one reason. For instance, a questions is about undergraduates, and", "a shopping question? This also applies to broad questions. I mean, some questions", "for being too broad or for the reason of being a shopping question.", "choose to vote to close a question? Being a shopping question or being", "shopping question. Which reason do you choose to vote to close a question?", "question? Being a shopping question or being too broad? My question here is,", "too broad or for the reason of being a shopping question. Which reason", "questions. I mean, some questions ask about a list of relevant websites or", "broad? My question here is, as a person deciding to close a question;", "you give priority in choosing such reasons? Which reasons are more important to", "I mean, some questions ask about a list of relevant websites or journals", "reason do you choose to vote to close a question? Being a shopping", "In some questions on Academia, it happens that some questions should be closed", "being a shopping question? This also applies to broad questions. I mean, some", "more than one reason. For instance, a questions is about undergraduates, and at", "of it's content for asking a shopping question. Which one do you choose,", "to close a question? Being a shopping question or being too broad? My", "this question may be closed for being too broad or for the reason", "on Academia, it happens that some questions should be closed for more than", "shopping question or being too broad? My question here is, as a person", "reason of being a shopping question. Which reason do you choose to vote", "question may be closed for being too broad or for the reason of", "do you choose to vote to close a question? Being a shopping question", "a person deciding to close a question; how do you give priority in", "to vote to close a question? Being a shopping question or being too", "should be closed because of it's content for asking a shopping question. Which", "because of it's content for asking a shopping question. Which one do you", "question? This also applies to broad questions. I mean, some questions ask about", "websites or journals in an area of science; this question may be closed", "close a question; how do you give priority in choosing such reasons? Which", "some questions should be closed for more than one reason. For instance, a", "about undergraduates, and at the same time it should be closed because of", "or for the reason of being a shopping question. Which reason do you", "because it is about undergraduates or being a shopping question? This also applies", "question or being too broad? My question here is, as a person deciding", "do you choose, being off-topic because it is about undergraduates or being a", "relevant websites or journals in an area of science; this question may be", "one do you choose, being off-topic because it is about undergraduates or being", "the same time it should be closed because of it's content for asking", "This also applies to broad questions. I mean, some questions ask about a", "mean, some questions ask about a list of relevant websites or journals in", "of being a shopping question. Which reason do you choose to vote to", "Which one do you choose, being off-topic because it is about undergraduates or", "or being too broad? My question here is, as a person deciding to", "a question; how do you give priority in choosing such reasons? Which reasons", "deciding to close a question; how do you give priority in choosing such", "in an area of science; this question may be closed for being too", "reason. For instance, a questions is about undergraduates, and at the same time", "should be closed for more than one reason. For instance, a questions is", "an area of science; this question may be closed for being too broad", "undergraduates or being a shopping question? This also applies to broad questions. I", "about a list of relevant websites or journals in an area of science;", "be closed for being too broad or for the reason of being a", "some questions on Academia, it happens that some questions should be closed for", "more important to be checked and to be in mind when judging on-topicness", "closed for more than one reason. For instance, a questions is about undergraduates,", "it happens that some questions should be closed for more than one reason.", "being too broad? My question here is, as a person deciding to close", "question; how do you give priority in choosing such reasons? Which reasons are", "as a person deciding to close a question; how do you give priority", "give priority in choosing such reasons? Which reasons are more important to be", "broad or for the reason of being a shopping question. Which reason do", "questions should be closed for more than one reason. For instance, a questions", "closed for being too broad or for the reason of being a shopping", "same time it should be closed because of it's content for asking a", "questions on Academia, it happens that some questions should be closed for more", "about undergraduates or being a shopping question? This also applies to broad questions.", "such reasons? Which reasons are more important to be checked and to be", "off-topic because it is about undergraduates or being a shopping question? This also", "to broad questions. I mean, some questions ask about a list of relevant", "or journals in an area of science; this question may be closed for", "do you give priority in choosing such reasons? Which reasons are more important", "for asking a shopping question. Which one do you choose, being off-topic because", "applies to broad questions. I mean, some questions ask about a list of", "happens that some questions should be closed for more than one reason. For", "of science; this question may be closed for being too broad or for", "it is about undergraduates or being a shopping question? This also applies to", "Being a shopping question or being too broad? My question here is, as", "you choose to vote to close a question? Being a shopping question or", "question here is, as a person deciding to close a question; how do", "one reason. For instance, a questions is about undergraduates, and at the same", "My question here is, as a person deciding to close a question; how", "some questions ask about a list of relevant websites or journals in an", "reasons are more important to be checked and to be in mind when", "at the same time it should be closed because of it's content for", "than one reason. For instance, a questions is about undergraduates, and at the" ]
[ "raise a vote to close to that specific question; when he continues his", "is also on the *First Posts* page. Also, the other strategy is that", "to that specific question; when he continues his review to the *Close Posts*", "his close vote which he raised in the previous review session. When I", "that specific question; when he continues his review to the *Close Posts* page", "Because then I will not fail to review that question which is also", "on the *First Posts* review page. I first, review such post for convenient", "page. Because then I will not fail to review that question which is", "to close a question even I find an off-topic question on the *First", "*First Posts* review page. I first, review such post for convenient grammar, title", "when my review is complete, I go back to the question and vote", "close to that specific question; when he continues his review to the *Close", "off-topic question on the *First Posts* review page. I first, review such post", "spam, etc; and when my review is complete, I go back to the", "to review that question which is also on the *First Posts* page. Also,", "on the *First Posts* page. Also, the other strategy is that I do", "be closed. In these very rare moments, how do you decide on such", "closing such question. The only option he will have is to retract his", "somebody first opens the *First Posts* review page, and he raise a vote", "Posts* page and see the same question there, he will not have the", "etc; and when my review is complete, I go back to the question", "vote it to be closed. In these very rare moments, how do you", "first, review such post for convenient grammar, title and tags, not being spam,", "of *First Posts* and *Close Posts*. The problem here is that, if somebody", "Posts*. The problem here is that, if somebody first opens the *First Posts*", "he continues his review to the *Close Posts* page and see the same", "I go back to the question and vote it to be closed. In", "post for convenient grammar, title and tags, not being spam, etc; and when", "I faced such problem, I decided to first open the *Close Votes* review", "such post for convenient grammar, title and tags, not being spam, etc; and", "decided to first open the *Close Votes* review page. Because then I will", "I do not vote to close a question even I find an off-topic", "the *First Posts* review page. I first, review such post for convenient grammar,", "and when my review is complete, I go back to the question and", "the *First Posts* page. Also, the other strategy is that I do not", "both lists of *First Posts* and *Close Posts*. The problem here is that,", "lists of *First Posts* and *Close Posts*. The problem here is that, if", "question; when he continues his review to the *Close Posts* page and see", "if somebody first opens the *First Posts* review page, and he raise a", "fail to review that question which is also on the *First Posts* page.", "he will have is to retract his close vote which he raised in", "Posts* review page, and he raise a vote to close to that specific", "question and vote it to be closed. In these very rare moments, how", "the *First Posts* review page, and he raise a vote to close to", "which he raised in the previous review session. When I faced such problem,", "for convenient grammar, title and tags, not being spam, etc; and when my", "not being spam, etc; and when my review is complete, I go back", "*First Posts* page. Also, the other strategy is that I do not vote", "the other strategy is that I do not vote to close a question", "to close to that specific question; when he continues his review to the", "there, he will not have the option to agree with the raised flag", "continues his review to the *Close Posts* page and see the same question", "not have the option to agree with the raised flag for closing such", "Also, the other strategy is that I do not vote to close a", "page, and he raise a vote to close to that specific question; when", "the option to agree with the raised flag for closing such question. The", "flag for closing such question. The only option he will have is to", "closed. In these very rare moments, how do you decide on such question?", "the *Close Posts* page and see the same question there, he will not", "that, if somebody first opens the *First Posts* review page, and he raise", "and tags, not being spam, etc; and when my review is complete, I", "problem here is that, if somebody first opens the *First Posts* review page,", "specific question; when he continues his review to the *Close Posts* page and", "I decided to first open the *Close Votes* review page. Because then I", "with the raised flag for closing such question. The only option he will", "to the question and vote it to be closed. In these very rare", "problem, I decided to first open the *Close Votes* review page. Because then", "the question and vote it to be closed. In these very rare moments,", "to first open the *Close Votes* review page. Because then I will not", "the website, there is a question which is in both lists of *First", "a question even I find an off-topic question on the *First Posts* review", "vote to close to that specific question; when he continues his review to", "first opens the *First Posts* review page, and he raise a vote to", "go back to the question and vote it to be closed. In these", "I open the review page of the website, there is a question which", "in both lists of *First Posts* and *Close Posts*. The problem here is", "grammar, title and tags, not being spam, etc; and when my review is", "it to be closed. In these very rare moments, how do you decide", "not vote to close a question even I find an off-topic question on", "open the *Close Votes* review page. Because then I will not fail to", "page of the website, there is a question which is in both lists", "not fail to review that question which is also on the *First Posts*", "retract his close vote which he raised in the previous review session. When", "raised in the previous review session. When I faced such problem, I decided", "which is also on the *First Posts* page. Also, the other strategy is", "the raised flag for closing such question. The only option he will have", "is to retract his close vote which he raised in the previous review", "raised flag for closing such question. The only option he will have is", "in the previous review session. When I faced such problem, I decided to", "I find an off-topic question on the *First Posts* review page. I first,", "also on the *First Posts* page. Also, the other strategy is that I", "the same question there, he will not have the option to agree with", "It happens when I open the review page of the website, there is", "then I will not fail to review that question which is also on", "close vote which he raised in the previous review session. When I faced", "strategy is that I do not vote to close a question even I", "open the review page of the website, there is a question which is", "when he continues his review to the *Close Posts* page and see the", "When I faced such problem, I decided to first open the *Close Votes*", "page. Also, the other strategy is that I do not vote to close", "is that I do not vote to close a question even I find", "Posts* and *Close Posts*. The problem here is that, if somebody first opens", "*First Posts* and *Close Posts*. The problem here is that, if somebody first", "review page. I first, review such post for convenient grammar, title and tags,", "there is a question which is in both lists of *First Posts* and", "the previous review session. When I faced such problem, I decided to first", "will not have the option to agree with the raised flag for closing", "he raise a vote to close to that specific question; when he continues", "and see the same question there, he will not have the option to", "agree with the raised flag for closing such question. The only option he", "have is to retract his close vote which he raised in the previous", "title and tags, not being spam, etc; and when my review is complete,", "find an off-topic question on the *First Posts* review page. I first, review", "previous review session. When I faced such problem, I decided to first open", "The problem here is that, if somebody first opens the *First Posts* review", "Posts* page. Also, the other strategy is that I do not vote to", "have the option to agree with the raised flag for closing such question.", "*Close Votes* review page. Because then I will not fail to review that", "that I do not vote to close a question even I find an", "question. The only option he will have is to retract his close vote", "I will not fail to review that question which is also on the", "review session. When I faced such problem, I decided to first open the", "review is complete, I go back to the question and vote it to", "is a question which is in both lists of *First Posts* and *Close", "review such post for convenient grammar, title and tags, not being spam, etc;", "a question which is in both lists of *First Posts* and *Close Posts*.", "session. When I faced such problem, I decided to first open the *Close", "my review is complete, I go back to the question and vote it", "only option he will have is to retract his close vote which he", "see the same question there, he will not have the option to agree", "vote which he raised in the previous review session. When I faced such", "The only option he will have is to retract his close vote which", "being spam, etc; and when my review is complete, I go back to", "review page, and he raise a vote to close to that specific question;", "question which is also on the *First Posts* page. Also, the other strategy", "will have is to retract his close vote which he raised in the", "an off-topic question on the *First Posts* review page. I first, review such", "and he raise a vote to close to that specific question; when he", "do not vote to close a question even I find an off-topic question", "will not fail to review that question which is also on the *First", "to the *Close Posts* page and see the same question there, he will", "same question there, he will not have the option to agree with the", "opens the *First Posts* review page, and he raise a vote to close", "question there, he will not have the option to agree with the raised", "he raised in the previous review session. When I faced such problem, I", "is that, if somebody first opens the *First Posts* review page, and he", "the review page of the website, there is a question which is in", "for closing such question. The only option he will have is to retract", "that question which is also on the *First Posts* page. Also, the other", "website, there is a question which is in both lists of *First Posts*", "to be closed. In these very rare moments, how do you decide on", "Posts* review page. I first, review such post for convenient grammar, title and", "such problem, I decided to first open the *Close Votes* review page. Because", "when I open the review page of the website, there is a question", "Votes* review page. Because then I will not fail to review that question", "first open the *Close Votes* review page. Because then I will not fail", "other strategy is that I do not vote to close a question even", "faced such problem, I decided to first open the *Close Votes* review page.", "page. I first, review such post for convenient grammar, title and tags, not", "review page of the website, there is a question which is in both", "convenient grammar, title and tags, not being spam, etc; and when my review", "question which is in both lists of *First Posts* and *Close Posts*. The", "he will not have the option to agree with the raised flag for", "review that question which is also on the *First Posts* page. Also, the", "to retract his close vote which he raised in the previous review session.", "happens when I open the review page of the website, there is a", "option to agree with the raised flag for closing such question. The only", "review page. Because then I will not fail to review that question which", "page and see the same question there, he will not have the option", "even I find an off-topic question on the *First Posts* review page. I", "a vote to close to that specific question; when he continues his review", "of the website, there is a question which is in both lists of", "such question. The only option he will have is to retract his close", "option he will have is to retract his close vote which he raised", "complete, I go back to the question and vote it to be closed.", "review to the *Close Posts* page and see the same question there, he", "the *Close Votes* review page. Because then I will not fail to review", "*Close Posts*. The problem here is that, if somebody first opens the *First", "I first, review such post for convenient grammar, title and tags, not being", "is in both lists of *First Posts* and *Close Posts*. The problem here", "*First Posts* review page, and he raise a vote to close to that", "question on the *First Posts* review page. I first, review such post for", "his review to the *Close Posts* page and see the same question there,", "*Close Posts* page and see the same question there, he will not have", "close a question even I find an off-topic question on the *First Posts*", "question even I find an off-topic question on the *First Posts* review page.", "tags, not being spam, etc; and when my review is complete, I go", "is complete, I go back to the question and vote it to be", "back to the question and vote it to be closed. In these very", "vote to close a question even I find an off-topic question on the", "and *Close Posts*. The problem here is that, if somebody first opens the", "which is in both lists of *First Posts* and *Close Posts*. The problem", "here is that, if somebody first opens the *First Posts* review page, and", "to agree with the raised flag for closing such question. The only option", "and vote it to be closed. In these very rare moments, how do" ]
[ "for STEM Graduate Applications including: School (or Description): GRE: Q/V/W GPA: Major GPA:", "Graduate Applications including: School (or Description): GRE: Q/V/W GPA: Major GPA: Accepted/Denied: Extracurriculars/Research:", "was hoping we could start a [gradcafe](http://thegradcafe.com/survey/index.php?q=computer%20science%20&t=a&o=) style post for STEM Graduate Applications", "a [gradcafe](http://thegradcafe.com/survey/index.php?q=computer%20science%20&t=a&o=) style post for STEM Graduate Applications including: School (or Description): GRE:", "style post for STEM Graduate Applications including: School (or Description): GRE: Q/V/W GPA:", "start a [gradcafe](http://thegradcafe.com/survey/index.php?q=computer%20science%20&t=a&o=) style post for STEM Graduate Applications including: School (or Description):", "[gradcafe](http://thegradcafe.com/survey/index.php?q=computer%20science%20&t=a&o=) style post for STEM Graduate Applications including: School (or Description): GRE: Q/V/W", "STEM Graduate Applications including: School (or Description): GRE: Q/V/W GPA: Major GPA: Accepted/Denied:", "we could start a [gradcafe](http://thegradcafe.com/survey/index.php?q=computer%20science%20&t=a&o=) style post for STEM Graduate Applications including: School", "I was hoping we could start a [gradcafe](http://thegradcafe.com/survey/index.php?q=computer%20science%20&t=a&o=) style post for STEM Graduate", "post for STEM Graduate Applications including: School (or Description): GRE: Q/V/W GPA: Major", "hoping we could start a [gradcafe](http://thegradcafe.com/survey/index.php?q=computer%20science%20&t=a&o=) style post for STEM Graduate Applications including:", "could start a [gradcafe](http://thegradcafe.com/survey/index.php?q=computer%20science%20&t=a&o=) style post for STEM Graduate Applications including: School (or" ]
[ "should post this soft question on Academia instead.\" (Brand New SE User, even", "user to be told to post here, only to have the question downvoted", "familiar with the SE way, and may be more capable of understanding our", "on several occasions: * New user posts a very broad, subjective, and/or open-ended", "SE User, even if he reads our help center, is likely to trust", "I should post it here.\" Obviously, it's very frustrating for a new user", "our help center, is likely to trust High-Rep User of Other SE more", "told me on X.SE that X.SE is only for questions about X, that", "center, is likely to trust High-Rep User of Other SE more than his", "the SE way, and may be more capable of understanding our policies than", "says something like, \"But they told me on X.SE that X.SE is only", "* New user posts a very broad, subjective, and/or open-ended question (and not", "of our somewhat confusing help center. And High-Rep User of Other SE is", "to educate the High-Rep User of Other SE who says to Brand New", "we do to help avoid this situation? To clarify: I was thinking about", "told to post here, only to have the question downvoted and closed. What", "our somewhat confusing help center. And High-Rep User of Other SE is already", "and closed. What can we do to help avoid this situation? To clarify:", "When the question is closed, the user says something like, \"But they told", "on X.SE that X.SE is only for questions about X, that Academia.SE is", "that Academia.SE is for soft questions, and I should post it here.\" Obviously,", "to trust High-Rep User of Other SE more than his own understanding of", "I was thinking about how to educate the High-Rep User of Other SE", "thinking about how to educate the High-Rep User of Other SE who says", "help avoid this situation? To clarify: I was thinking about how to educate", "SE who says to Brand New SE User there, \"Hey, you should post", "is already familiar with the SE way, and may be more capable of", "own understanding of our somewhat confusing help center. And High-Rep User of Other", "only to have the question downvoted and closed. What can we do to", "\"good subjective\" type, either). * When the question is closed, the user says", "several occasions: * New user posts a very broad, subjective, and/or open-ended question", "here, only to have the question downvoted and closed. What can we do", "instead.\" (Brand New SE User, even if he reads our help center, is", "avoid this situation? To clarify: I was thinking about how to educate the", "and I should post it here.\" Obviously, it's very frustrating for a new", "I have observed the following on several occasions: * New user posts a", "with the SE way, and may be more capable of understanding our policies", "User of Other SE more than his own understanding of our somewhat confusing", "(Brand New SE User, even if he reads our help center, is likely", "if he reads our help center, is likely to trust High-Rep User of", "who says to Brand New SE User there, \"Hey, you should post this", "was thinking about how to educate the High-Rep User of Other SE who", "Obviously, it's very frustrating for a new user to be told to post", "even if he reads our help center, is likely to trust High-Rep User", "user posts a very broad, subjective, and/or open-ended question (and not the \"good", "it here.\" Obviously, it's very frustrating for a new user to be told", "the \"good subjective\" type, either). * When the question is closed, the user", "question (and not the \"good subjective\" type, either). * When the question is", "to help avoid this situation? To clarify: I was thinking about how to", "help center. And High-Rep User of Other SE is already familiar with the", "SE User there, \"Hey, you should post this soft question on Academia instead.\"", "for soft questions, and I should post it here.\" Obviously, it's very frustrating", "Brand New SE User there, \"Hey, you should post this soft question on", "type, either). * When the question is closed, the user says something like,", "is only for questions about X, that Academia.SE is for soft questions, and", "me on X.SE that X.SE is only for questions about X, that Academia.SE", "High-Rep User of Other SE is already familiar with the SE way, and", "X, that Academia.SE is for soft questions, and I should post it here.\"", "the question downvoted and closed. What can we do to help avoid this", "is likely to trust High-Rep User of Other SE more than his own", "High-Rep User of Other SE who says to Brand New SE User there,", "post it here.\" Obviously, it's very frustrating for a new user to be", "High-Rep User of Other SE more than his own understanding of our somewhat", "way, and may be more capable of understanding our policies than Brand New", "the following on several occasions: * New user posts a very broad, subjective,", "for questions about X, that Academia.SE is for soft questions, and I should", "his own understanding of our somewhat confusing help center. And High-Rep User of", "he reads our help center, is likely to trust High-Rep User of Other", "soft questions, and I should post it here.\" Obviously, it's very frustrating for", "SE is already familiar with the SE way, and may be more capable", "this soft question on Academia instead.\" (Brand New SE User, even if he", "X.SE that X.SE is only for questions about X, that Academia.SE is for", "help center, is likely to trust High-Rep User of Other SE more than", "And High-Rep User of Other SE is already familiar with the SE way,", "have observed the following on several occasions: * New user posts a very", "User, even if he reads our help center, is likely to trust High-Rep", "on Academia instead.\" (Brand New SE User, even if he reads our help", "very broad, subjective, and/or open-ended question (and not the \"good subjective\" type, either).", "a very broad, subjective, and/or open-ended question (and not the \"good subjective\" type,", "like, \"But they told me on X.SE that X.SE is only for questions", "\"Hey, you should post this soft question on Academia instead.\" (Brand New SE", "* When the question is closed, the user says something like, \"But they", "downvoted and closed. What can we do to help avoid this situation? To", "how to educate the High-Rep User of Other SE who says to Brand", "reads our help center, is likely to trust High-Rep User of Other SE", "observed the following on several occasions: * New user posts a very broad,", "not the \"good subjective\" type, either). * When the question is closed, the", "do to help avoid this situation? To clarify: I was thinking about how", "may be more capable of understanding our policies than Brand New SE User.)", "is for soft questions, and I should post it here.\" Obviously, it's very", "user says something like, \"But they told me on X.SE that X.SE is", "about how to educate the High-Rep User of Other SE who says to", "and may be more capable of understanding our policies than Brand New SE", "to have the question downvoted and closed. What can we do to help", "can we do to help avoid this situation? To clarify: I was thinking", "New SE User, even if he reads our help center, is likely to", "to Brand New SE User there, \"Hey, you should post this soft question", "occasions: * New user posts a very broad, subjective, and/or open-ended question (and", "educate the High-Rep User of Other SE who says to Brand New SE", "post here, only to have the question downvoted and closed. What can we", "trust High-Rep User of Other SE more than his own understanding of our", "already familiar with the SE way, and may be more capable of understanding", "post this soft question on Academia instead.\" (Brand New SE User, even if", "subjective, and/or open-ended question (and not the \"good subjective\" type, either). * When", "of Other SE is already familiar with the SE way, and may be", "question on Academia instead.\" (Brand New SE User, even if he reads our", "User there, \"Hey, you should post this soft question on Academia instead.\" (Brand", "new user to be told to post here, only to have the question", "questions about X, that Academia.SE is for soft questions, and I should post", "understanding of our somewhat confusing help center. And High-Rep User of Other SE", "is closed, the user says something like, \"But they told me on X.SE", "somewhat confusing help center. And High-Rep User of Other SE is already familiar", "the user says something like, \"But they told me on X.SE that X.SE", "posts a very broad, subjective, and/or open-ended question (and not the \"good subjective\"", "New user posts a very broad, subjective, and/or open-ended question (and not the", "this situation? To clarify: I was thinking about how to educate the High-Rep", "and/or open-ended question (and not the \"good subjective\" type, either). * When the", "a new user to be told to post here, only to have the", "Other SE more than his own understanding of our somewhat confusing help center.", "for a new user to be told to post here, only to have", "SE way, and may be more capable of understanding our policies than Brand", "be told to post here, only to have the question downvoted and closed.", "center. And High-Rep User of Other SE is already familiar with the SE", "of Other SE more than his own understanding of our somewhat confusing help", "SE more than his own understanding of our somewhat confusing help center. And", "that X.SE is only for questions about X, that Academia.SE is for soft", "should post it here.\" Obviously, it's very frustrating for a new user to", "X.SE is only for questions about X, that Academia.SE is for soft questions,", "Academia instead.\" (Brand New SE User, even if he reads our help center,", "you should post this soft question on Academia instead.\" (Brand New SE User,", "question is closed, the user says something like, \"But they told me on", "User of Other SE who says to Brand New SE User there, \"Hey,", "User of Other SE is already familiar with the SE way, and may", "frustrating for a new user to be told to post here, only to", "subjective\" type, either). * When the question is closed, the user says something", "following on several occasions: * New user posts a very broad, subjective, and/or", "soft question on Academia instead.\" (Brand New SE User, even if he reads", "the High-Rep User of Other SE who says to Brand New SE User", "(and not the \"good subjective\" type, either). * When the question is closed,", "here.\" Obviously, it's very frustrating for a new user to be told to", "open-ended question (and not the \"good subjective\" type, either). * When the question", "New SE User there, \"Hey, you should post this soft question on Academia", "Academia.SE is for soft questions, and I should post it here.\" Obviously, it's", "\"But they told me on X.SE that X.SE is only for questions about", "clarify: I was thinking about how to educate the High-Rep User of Other", "to be told to post here, only to have the question downvoted and", "more than his own understanding of our somewhat confusing help center. And High-Rep", "closed, the user says something like, \"But they told me on X.SE that", "broad, subjective, and/or open-ended question (and not the \"good subjective\" type, either). *", "What can we do to help avoid this situation? To clarify: I was", "of Other SE who says to Brand New SE User there, \"Hey, you", "there, \"Hey, you should post this soft question on Academia instead.\" (Brand New", "closed. What can we do to help avoid this situation? To clarify: I", "confusing help center. And High-Rep User of Other SE is already familiar with", "the question is closed, the user says something like, \"But they told me", "they told me on X.SE that X.SE is only for questions about X,", "either). * When the question is closed, the user says something like, \"But", "to post here, only to have the question downvoted and closed. What can", "Other SE is already familiar with the SE way, and may be more", "about X, that Academia.SE is for soft questions, and I should post it", "only for questions about X, that Academia.SE is for soft questions, and I", "To clarify: I was thinking about how to educate the High-Rep User of", "very frustrating for a new user to be told to post here, only", "it's very frustrating for a new user to be told to post here,", "have the question downvoted and closed. What can we do to help avoid", "than his own understanding of our somewhat confusing help center. And High-Rep User", "questions, and I should post it here.\" Obviously, it's very frustrating for a", "says to Brand New SE User there, \"Hey, you should post this soft", "question downvoted and closed. What can we do to help avoid this situation?", "Other SE who says to Brand New SE User there, \"Hey, you should", "likely to trust High-Rep User of Other SE more than his own understanding", "situation? To clarify: I was thinking about how to educate the High-Rep User", "something like, \"But they told me on X.SE that X.SE is only for" ]
[ "research I need to make. The Academia is about the process of making", "can be found. Question being - how can I find out which stack", "for some research material and I do not know how to look for", "I did not post yet is related to academia - to the specific", "already know, that META Academia is not the perfect place to start, but", "question thus to be about the process of the research, because I am", "am not asking about the research itself, but the process - *looking for", "would fit this type of question? Should I just pick one and hope", "find a big amount of textual data, which have some type of content.", "algorithimically processed. It is related to linguistics, because the type of processing and", "am having severe difficulties looking for such content and I believe there must", "to post such a problem? It is related to computer science since the", "I do not know how to look for it efficiently... But none of", "seems to be at least partially appropriate place to ask. So background to", "processing. It is related to Academia in the sense that I am looking", "to the specific research I need to make. The Academia is about the", "itself. I would consider this question thus to be about the process of", "about research) seems to be at least partially appropriate place to ask. So", "It is related to computer science since the texts will be algorithimically processed.", "about the process of the research, because I am not asking about the", "in which I need to find a big amount of textual data, which", "of it is quite a good fit. Is it likely, that there is", "the process - *looking for a way to continue the research* Thus Meta", "none of it is quite a good fit. Is it likely, that there", "looking for some research material and I do not know how to look", "not know how to look for it efficiently... But none of it is", "to academia - to the specific research I need to make. The Academia", "continue the research* Thus Meta Academia (asking about asking about research) seems to", "asking about the research itself, but the process - *looking for a way", "problem? It is related to computer science since the texts will be algorithimically", "thus to be about the process of the research, because I am not", "some research material and I do not know how to look for it", "background to the question: I have a research in which I need to", "I am having severe difficulties looking for such content and I believe there", "how to look for it efficiently... But none of it is quite a", "META Academia is not the perfect place to start, but my original question", "about asking about research) seems to be at least partially appropriate place to", "to be at least partially appropriate place to ask. So background to the", "on how to look for such content, or - directly - where such", "appropriate to post such a problem? It is related to computer science since", "the process of the research, because I am not asking about the research", "content and I believe there must be an appropriate stack exchange website to", "which have some type of content. In my case, I am looking for", "to make. The Academia is about the process of making the research, not", "be about the process of the research, because I am not asking about", "to continue the research* Thus Meta Academia (asking about asking about research) seems", "of question? Should I just pick one and hope for not getting downvotes?", "is related to academia - to the specific research I need to make.", "looking for texts, that are written in aggressive way, to process it later.", "is quite a good fit. Is it likely, that there is no such", "an appropriate stack exchange website to ask for a suggestion on how to", "to start, but my original question which I did not post yet is", "look for such content, or - directly - where such content can be", "believe there must be an appropriate stack exchange website to ask for a", "texts will be algorithimically processed. It is related to linguistics, because the type", "material and I do not know how to look for it efficiently... But", "specific research I need to make. The Academia is about the process of", "for such content and I believe there must be an appropriate stack exchange", "find out which stack exchange website is appropriate to post such a problem?", "but my original question which I did not post yet is related to", "later. I am having severe difficulties looking for such content and I believe", "It is related to linguistics, because the type of processing and purpose is", "a problem? It is related to computer science since the texts will be", "there is no such stackexchange page, that would fit this type of question?", "having severe difficulties looking for such content and I believe there must be", "sense that I am looking for some research material and I do not", "academia - to the specific research I need to make. The Academia is", "not asking about the research itself, but the process - *looking for a", "- where such content can be found. Question being - how can I", "such content can be found. Question being - how can I find out", "question which I did not post yet is related to academia - to", "the type of processing and purpose is natural language processing. It is related", "am looking for some research material and I do not know how to", "- to the specific research I need to make. The Academia is about", "such a problem? It is related to computer science since the texts will", "and I do not know how to look for it efficiently... But none", "that are written in aggressive way, to process it later. I am having", "appropriate place to ask. So background to the question: I have a research", "the process of making the research, not the research content itself. I would", "In my case, I am looking for texts, that are written in aggressive", "not the research content itself. I would consider this question thus to be", "consider this question thus to be about the process of the research, because", "So background to the question: I have a research in which I need", "such content and I believe there must be an appropriate stack exchange website", "suggestion on how to look for such content, or - directly - where", "a big amount of textual data, which have some type of content. In", "original question which I did not post yet is related to academia -", "at least partially appropriate place to ask. So background to the question: I", "is natural language processing. It is related to Academia in the sense that", "have a research in which I need to find a big amount of", "the sense that I am looking for some research material and I do", "that would fit this type of question? Should I just pick one and", "in the sense that I am looking for some research material and I", "am looking for texts, that are written in aggressive way, to process it", "it efficiently... But none of it is quite a good fit. Is it", "Question being - how can I find out which stack exchange website is", "my original question which I did not post yet is related to academia", "page, that would fit this type of question? Should I just pick one", "case, I am looking for texts, that are written in aggressive way, to", "The Academia is about the process of making the research, not the research", "content can be found. Question being - how can I find out which", "to Academia in the sense that I am looking for some research material", "be an appropriate stack exchange website to ask for a suggestion on how", "processing and purpose is natural language processing. It is related to Academia in", "partially appropriate place to ask. So background to the question: I have a", "post yet is related to academia - to the specific research I need", "to ask for a suggestion on how to look for such content, or", "processed. It is related to linguistics, because the type of processing and purpose", "website is appropriate to post such a problem? It is related to computer", "appropriate stack exchange website to ask for a suggestion on how to look", "process - *looking for a way to continue the research* Thus Meta Academia", "- how can I find out which stack exchange website is appropriate to", "least partially appropriate place to ask. So background to the question: I have", "way to continue the research* Thus Meta Academia (asking about asking about research)", "place to ask. So background to the question: I have a research in", "know how to look for it efficiently... But none of it is quite", "must be an appropriate stack exchange website to ask for a suggestion on", "I need to find a big amount of textual data, which have some", "some type of content. In my case, I am looking for texts, that", "the research content itself. I would consider this question thus to be about", "amount of textual data, which have some type of content. In my case,", "type of question? Should I just pick one and hope for not getting", "and I believe there must be an appropriate stack exchange website to ask", "a way to continue the research* Thus Meta Academia (asking about asking about", "ask. So background to the question: I have a research in which I", "yet is related to academia - to the specific research I need to", "making the research, not the research content itself. I would consider this question", "for a way to continue the research* Thus Meta Academia (asking about asking", "severe difficulties looking for such content and I believe there must be an", "is related to computer science since the texts will be algorithimically processed. It", "to computer science since the texts will be algorithimically processed. It is related", "to process it later. I am having severe difficulties looking for such content", "because the type of processing and purpose is natural language processing. It is", "how can I find out which stack exchange website is appropriate to post", "make. The Academia is about the process of making the research, not the", "the specific research I need to make. The Academia is about the process", "out which stack exchange website is appropriate to post such a problem? It", "computer science since the texts will be algorithimically processed. It is related to", "Academia in the sense that I am looking for some research material and", "content, or - directly - where such content can be found. Question being", "because I am not asking about the research itself, but the process -", "question: I have a research in which I need to find a big", "I am looking for texts, that are written in aggressive way, to process", "need to make. The Academia is about the process of making the research,", "would consider this question thus to be about the process of the research,", "is appropriate to post such a problem? It is related to computer science", "data, which have some type of content. In my case, I am looking", "for texts, that are written in aggressive way, to process it later. I", "difficulties looking for such content and I believe there must be an appropriate", "exchange website to ask for a suggestion on how to look for such", "which stack exchange website is appropriate to post such a problem? It is", "science since the texts will be algorithimically processed. It is related to linguistics,", "or - directly - where such content can be found. Question being -", "related to Academia in the sense that I am looking for some research", "I need to make. The Academia is about the process of making the", "Academia is about the process of making the research, not the research content", "is not the perfect place to start, but my original question which I", "research) seems to be at least partially appropriate place to ask. So background", "type of content. In my case, I am looking for texts, that are", "the texts will be algorithimically processed. It is related to linguistics, because the", "I believe there must be an appropriate stack exchange website to ask for", "the perfect place to start, but my original question which I did not", "the research itself, but the process - *looking for a way to continue", "research content itself. I would consider this question thus to be about the", "way, to process it later. I am having severe difficulties looking for such", "it later. I am having severe difficulties looking for such content and I", "for it efficiently... But none of it is quite a good fit. Is", "But none of it is quite a good fit. Is it likely, that", "need to find a big amount of textual data, which have some type", "It is related to Academia in the sense that I am looking for", "this question thus to be about the process of the research, because I", "textual data, which have some type of content. In my case, I am", "fit. Is it likely, that there is no such stackexchange page, that would", "such stackexchange page, that would fit this type of question? Should I just", "to look for it efficiently... But none of it is quite a good", "do not know how to look for it efficiently... But none of it", "for such content, or - directly - where such content can be found.", "language processing. It is related to Academia in the sense that I am", "but the process - *looking for a way to continue the research* Thus", "- directly - where such content can be found. Question being - how", "process of the research, because I am not asking about the research itself,", "of textual data, which have some type of content. In my case, I", "be algorithimically processed. It is related to linguistics, because the type of processing", "that META Academia is not the perfect place to start, but my original", "stack exchange website is appropriate to post such a problem? It is related", "which I need to find a big amount of textual data, which have", "how to look for such content, or - directly - where such content", "in aggressive way, to process it later. I am having severe difficulties looking", "I am looking for some research material and I do not know how", "website to ask for a suggestion on how to look for such content,", "research in which I need to find a big amount of textual data,", "is no such stackexchange page, that would fit this type of question? Should", "research* Thus Meta Academia (asking about asking about research) seems to be at", "is related to linguistics, because the type of processing and purpose is natural", "that I am looking for some research material and I do not know", "this type of question? Should I just pick one and hope for not", "I already know, that META Academia is not the perfect place to start,", "looking for such content and I believe there must be an appropriate stack", "can I find out which stack exchange website is appropriate to post such", "the research, not the research content itself. I would consider this question thus", "about the research itself, but the process - *looking for a way to", "be at least partially appropriate place to ask. So background to the question:", "is related to Academia in the sense that I am looking for some", "likely, that there is no such stackexchange page, that would fit this type", "there must be an appropriate stack exchange website to ask for a suggestion", "that there is no such stackexchange page, that would fit this type of", "Academia is not the perfect place to start, but my original question which", "a research in which I need to find a big amount of textual", "written in aggressive way, to process it later. I am having severe difficulties", "research, not the research content itself. I would consider this question thus to", "to look for such content, or - directly - where such content can", "related to computer science since the texts will be algorithimically processed. It is", "linguistics, because the type of processing and purpose is natural language processing. It", "to the question: I have a research in which I need to find", "good fit. Is it likely, that there is no such stackexchange page, that", "I have a research in which I need to find a big amount", "texts, that are written in aggressive way, to process it later. I am", "I would consider this question thus to be about the process of the", "of content. In my case, I am looking for texts, that are written", "content. In my case, I am looking for texts, that are written in", "not the perfect place to start, but my original question which I did", "about the process of making the research, not the research content itself. I", "the research, because I am not asking about the research itself, but the", "Academia (asking about asking about research) seems to be at least partially appropriate", "my case, I am looking for texts, that are written in aggressive way,", "such content, or - directly - where such content can be found. Question", "Is it likely, that there is no such stackexchange page, that would fit", "which I did not post yet is related to academia - to the", "start, but my original question which I did not post yet is related", "not post yet is related to academia - to the specific research I", "natural language processing. It is related to Academia in the sense that I", "is about the process of making the research, not the research content itself.", "perfect place to start, but my original question which I did not post", "to linguistics, because the type of processing and purpose is natural language processing.", "it likely, that there is no such stackexchange page, that would fit this", "to be about the process of the research, because I am not asking", "stackexchange page, that would fit this type of question? Should I just pick", "type of processing and purpose is natural language processing. It is related to", "(asking about asking about research) seems to be at least partially appropriate place", "of making the research, not the research content itself. I would consider this", "itself, but the process - *looking for a way to continue the research*", "stack exchange website to ask for a suggestion on how to look for", "purpose is natural language processing. It is related to Academia in the sense", "found. Question being - how can I find out which stack exchange website", "of the research, because I am not asking about the research itself, but", "research, because I am not asking about the research itself, but the process", "research itself, but the process - *looking for a way to continue the", "asking about research) seems to be at least partially appropriate place to ask.", "are written in aggressive way, to process it later. I am having severe", "exchange website is appropriate to post such a problem? It is related to", "the question: I have a research in which I need to find a", "look for it efficiently... But none of it is quite a good fit.", "I find out which stack exchange website is appropriate to post such a", "Thus Meta Academia (asking about asking about research) seems to be at least", "process it later. I am having severe difficulties looking for such content and", "- *looking for a way to continue the research* Thus Meta Academia (asking", "to find a big amount of textual data, which have some type of", "directly - where such content can be found. Question being - how can", "related to linguistics, because the type of processing and purpose is natural language", "of processing and purpose is natural language processing. It is related to Academia", "research material and I do not know how to look for it efficiently...", "efficiently... But none of it is quite a good fit. Is it likely,", "fit this type of question? Should I just pick one and hope for", "related to academia - to the specific research I need to make. The", "being - how can I find out which stack exchange website is appropriate", "be found. Question being - how can I find out which stack exchange", "post such a problem? It is related to computer science since the texts", "will be algorithimically processed. It is related to linguistics, because the type of", "place to start, but my original question which I did not post yet", "*looking for a way to continue the research* Thus Meta Academia (asking about", "Meta Academia (asking about asking about research) seems to be at least partially", "have some type of content. In my case, I am looking for texts,", "process of making the research, not the research content itself. I would consider", "big amount of textual data, which have some type of content. In my", "no such stackexchange page, that would fit this type of question? Should I", "to ask. So background to the question: I have a research in which", "quite a good fit. Is it likely, that there is no such stackexchange", "I am not asking about the research itself, but the process - *looking", "for a suggestion on how to look for such content, or - directly", "ask for a suggestion on how to look for such content, or -", "the research* Thus Meta Academia (asking about asking about research) seems to be", "aggressive way, to process it later. I am having severe difficulties looking for", "content itself. I would consider this question thus to be about the process", "it is quite a good fit. Is it likely, that there is no", "where such content can be found. Question being - how can I find", "know, that META Academia is not the perfect place to start, but my", "a suggestion on how to look for such content, or - directly -", "a good fit. Is it likely, that there is no such stackexchange page,", "and purpose is natural language processing. It is related to Academia in the", "did not post yet is related to academia - to the specific research", "since the texts will be algorithimically processed. It is related to linguistics, because" ]
[ "the cloud? What does the image mean? And how does it relate to", "its last wheel has something in it. There is a green cloud at", "pedal. The bicycle is lacking its first wheel, its last wheel has something", "first wheel, its last wheel has something in it. There is a green", "link get to a 404 error page.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25721/is-there-a-reason-to-prefer-one-country-over-another-for-phd-study/25733#25733) ![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/mfzD2.png) A sinuous wave coming from", "image mean? And how does it relate to the bottom image? ![image description](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EIWSg.png)", "wave. Why the bike, the wave and the cloud? What does the image", "its first wheel, its last wheel has something in it. There is a", "and the cloud? What does the image mean? And how does it relate", "has something in it. There is a green cloud at the end of", "404 error page.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25721/is-there-a-reason-to-prefer-one-country-over-another-for-phd-study/25733#25733) ![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/mfzD2.png) A sinuous wave coming from the pedal. The bicycle", "last wheel has something in it. There is a green cloud at the", "get to a 404 error page.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25721/is-there-a-reason-to-prefer-one-country-over-another-for-phd-study/25733#25733) ![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/mfzD2.png) A sinuous wave coming from the", "[A link get to a 404 error page.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25721/is-there-a-reason-to-prefer-one-country-over-another-for-phd-study/25733#25733) ![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/mfzD2.png) A sinuous wave coming", "the pedal. The bicycle is lacking its first wheel, its last wheel has", "page.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25721/is-there-a-reason-to-prefer-one-country-over-another-for-phd-study/25733#25733) ![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/mfzD2.png) A sinuous wave coming from the pedal. The bicycle is lacking", "A sinuous wave coming from the pedal. The bicycle is lacking its first", "a green cloud at the end of the wave. Why the bike, the", "from the pedal. The bicycle is lacking its first wheel, its last wheel", "of the wave. Why the bike, the wave and the cloud? What does", "the wave. Why the bike, the wave and the cloud? What does the", "What does the image mean? And how does it relate to the bottom", "wheel, its last wheel has something in it. There is a green cloud", "does the image mean? And how does it relate to the bottom image?", "end of the wave. Why the bike, the wave and the cloud? What", "Why the bike, the wave and the cloud? What does the image mean?", "the bike, the wave and the cloud? What does the image mean? And", "at the end of the wave. Why the bike, the wave and the", "![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/mfzD2.png) A sinuous wave coming from the pedal. The bicycle is lacking its", "The bicycle is lacking its first wheel, its last wheel has something in", "wave coming from the pedal. The bicycle is lacking its first wheel, its", "to a 404 error page.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25721/is-there-a-reason-to-prefer-one-country-over-another-for-phd-study/25733#25733) ![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/mfzD2.png) A sinuous wave coming from the pedal.", "cloud at the end of the wave. Why the bike, the wave and", "the end of the wave. Why the bike, the wave and the cloud?", "is a green cloud at the end of the wave. Why the bike,", "is lacking its first wheel, its last wheel has something in it. There", "coming from the pedal. The bicycle is lacking its first wheel, its last", "wheel has something in it. There is a green cloud at the end", "in it. There is a green cloud at the end of the wave.", "it. There is a green cloud at the end of the wave. Why", "wave and the cloud? What does the image mean? And how does it", "a 404 error page.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25721/is-there-a-reason-to-prefer-one-country-over-another-for-phd-study/25733#25733) ![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/mfzD2.png) A sinuous wave coming from the pedal. The", "something in it. There is a green cloud at the end of the", "There is a green cloud at the end of the wave. Why the", "error page.](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/25721/is-there-a-reason-to-prefer-one-country-over-another-for-phd-study/25733#25733) ![](https://i.stack.imgur.com/mfzD2.png) A sinuous wave coming from the pedal. The bicycle is", "cloud? What does the image mean? And how does it relate to the", "lacking its first wheel, its last wheel has something in it. There is", "bike, the wave and the cloud? What does the image mean? And how", "green cloud at the end of the wave. Why the bike, the wave", "the wave and the cloud? What does the image mean? And how does", "sinuous wave coming from the pedal. The bicycle is lacking its first wheel,", "the image mean? And how does it relate to the bottom image? ![image", "bicycle is lacking its first wheel, its last wheel has something in it." ]
[ "\"ideal\" reply. Naturally, I have up-voted both, since both are of interest to", "This would not be fair to either in my view, since their replies", "not show the completeness of these two. 4. Choose not to choose, accepting", "favorite choice from a moral standpoint. 3. Choose somebody else's answer. There are", "strategy to adopt when choosing which *most helpful* answer to accept? I have", "view, since their replies are truly complementary, i.e. make sense when taken together.", "to set deadline that is very late at night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a) on Academia. It has", "are several other very good answers, but they just do not show the", "been up for around 12 hours. However, I would appreciate any thoughts on", "interesting answers, high-quality IMHO and that have been abundantly up-voted by the community.", "since their replies are truly complementary, i.e. make sense when taken together. 2.", "no answer. But this would leave the question eternally open, when in fact", "answers, high-quality IMHO and that have been abundantly up-voted by the community. There", "answers go quite a long way to solving the original question as posed.", "by the community. There are two specific answers that I feel address complementary", "are truly complementary, i.e. make sense when taken together. 2. Choose neither, and", "do not show the completeness of these two. 4. Choose not to choose,", "make sense when taken together. 2. Choose neither, and post my own solution", "to either in my view, since their replies are truly complementary, i.e. make", "my own solution \"cannibalizing\" elements of both. Not my favorite choice from a", "between one or the other. This would not be fair to either in", "to solving the original question as posed. There is no immediate hurry, since", "they just do not show the completeness of these two. 4. Choose not", "very interesting answers, high-quality IMHO and that have been abundantly up-voted by the", "very late at night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a) on Academia. It has attracted several very interesting answers,", "most students submit assignments right around the deadline, is it advisable not to", "choice from a moral standpoint. 3. Choose somebody else's answer. There are several", "deadline, is it advisable not to set deadline that is very late at", "two. 4. Choose not to choose, accepting no answer. But this would leave", "go quite a long way to solving the original question as posed. There", "the elements given in the answers go quite a long way to solving", "have been considering several options: 1. Choose between one or the other. This", "that most students submit assignments right around the deadline, is it advisable not", "deadline that is very late at night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a) on Academia. It has attracted several", "advisable not to set deadline that is very late at night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a) on Academia.", "are of interest to a potential viewer of the question. My question is:", "My question is: what strategy to adopt when choosing which *most helpful* answer", "my view, since their replies are truly complementary, i.e. make sense when taken", "complementary aspects of an \"ideal\" reply. Naturally, I have up-voted both, since both", "of both. Not my favorite choice from a moral standpoint. 3. Choose somebody", "2. Choose neither, and post my own solution \"cannibalizing\" elements of both. Not", "long way to solving the original question as posed. There is no immediate", "is no immediate hurry, since the question has only been up for around", "aspects of an \"ideal\" reply. Naturally, I have up-voted both, since both are", "only been up for around 12 hours. However, I would appreciate any thoughts", "specific answers that I feel address complementary aspects of an \"ideal\" reply. Naturally,", "around the deadline, is it advisable not to set deadline that is very", "to a potential viewer of the question. My question is: what strategy to", "community. There are two specific answers that I feel address complementary aspects of", "several very interesting answers, high-quality IMHO and that have been abundantly up-voted by", "has only been up for around 12 hours. However, I would appreciate any", "both. Not my favorite choice from a moral standpoint. 3. Choose somebody else's", "[Knowing that most students submit assignments right around the deadline, is it advisable", "when in fact I think the elements given in the answers go quite", "question has only been up for around 12 hours. However, I would appreciate", "or the other. This would not be fair to either in my view,", "is it advisable not to set deadline that is very late at night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a)", "hurry, since the question has only been up for around 12 hours. However,", "the question. My question is: what strategy to adopt when choosing which *most", "*most helpful* answer to accept? I have been considering several options: 1. Choose", "an \"ideal\" reply. Naturally, I have up-voted both, since both are of interest", "leave the question eternally open, when in fact I think the elements given", "quite a long way to solving the original question as posed. There is", "no immediate hurry, since the question has only been up for around 12", "up-voted both, since both are of interest to a potential viewer of the", "answer. There are several other very good answers, but they just do not", "given in the answers go quite a long way to solving the original", "what strategy to adopt when choosing which *most helpful* answer to accept? I", "been considering several options: 1. Choose between one or the other. This would", "Choose between one or the other. This would not be fair to either", "have been abundantly up-voted by the community. There are two specific answers that", "that have been abundantly up-voted by the community. There are two specific answers", "is: what strategy to adopt when choosing which *most helpful* answer to accept?", "adopt when choosing which *most helpful* answer to accept? I have been considering", "reply. Naturally, I have up-voted both, since both are of interest to a", "both are of interest to a potential viewer of the question. My question", "when choosing which *most helpful* answer to accept? I have been considering several", "solution \"cannibalizing\" elements of both. Not my favorite choice from a moral standpoint.", "helpful* answer to accept? I have been considering several options: 1. Choose between", "of interest to a potential viewer of the question. My question is: what", "the answers go quite a long way to solving the original question as", "would not be fair to either in my view, since their replies are", "Naturally, I have up-voted both, since both are of interest to a potential", "There is no immediate hurry, since the question has only been up for", "question [Knowing that most students submit assignments right around the deadline, is it", "very good answers, but they just do not show the completeness of these", "considering several options: 1. Choose between one or the other. This would not", "I think the elements given in the answers go quite a long way", "not be fair to either in my view, since their replies are truly", "since the question has only been up for around 12 hours. However, I", "open, when in fact I think the elements given in the answers go", "night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a) on Academia. It has attracted several very interesting answers, high-quality IMHO and", "and that have been abundantly up-voted by the community. There are two specific", "think the elements given in the answers go quite a long way to", "else's answer. There are several other very good answers, but they just do", "I have been considering several options: 1. Choose between one or the other.", "I feel address complementary aspects of an \"ideal\" reply. Naturally, I have up-voted", "But this would leave the question eternally open, when in fact I think", "other very good answers, but they just do not show the completeness of", "question is: what strategy to adopt when choosing which *most helpful* answer to", "interest to a potential viewer of the question. My question is: what strategy", "sense when taken together. 2. Choose neither, and post my own solution \"cannibalizing\"", "of these two. 4. Choose not to choose, accepting no answer. But this", "feel address complementary aspects of an \"ideal\" reply. Naturally, I have up-voted both,", "somebody else's answer. There are several other very good answers, but they just", "the completeness of these two. 4. Choose not to choose, accepting no answer.", "is very late at night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a) on Academia. It has attracted several very interesting", "post my own solution \"cannibalizing\" elements of both. Not my favorite choice from", "high-quality IMHO and that have been abundantly up-voted by the community. There are", "of the question. My question is: what strategy to adopt when choosing which", "fair to either in my view, since their replies are truly complementary, i.e.", "i.e. make sense when taken together. 2. Choose neither, and post my own", "several other very good answers, but they just do not show the completeness", "for around 12 hours. However, I would appreciate any thoughts on making my", "complementary, i.e. make sense when taken together. 2. Choose neither, and post my", "of an \"ideal\" reply. Naturally, I have up-voted both, since both are of", "Not my favorite choice from a moral standpoint. 3. Choose somebody else's answer.", "this question [Knowing that most students submit assignments right around the deadline, is", "immediate hurry, since the question has only been up for around 12 hours.", "It has attracted several very interesting answers, high-quality IMHO and that have been", "question as posed. There is no immediate hurry, since the question has only", "I have up-voted both, since both are of interest to a potential viewer", "own solution \"cannibalizing\" elements of both. Not my favorite choice from a moral", "accept? I have been considering several options: 1. Choose between one or the", "around 12 hours. However, I would appreciate any thoughts on making my final", "elements of both. Not my favorite choice from a moral standpoint. 3. Choose", "submit assignments right around the deadline, is it advisable not to set deadline", "that is very late at night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a) on Academia. It has attracted several very", "show the completeness of these two. 4. Choose not to choose, accepting no", "good answers, but they just do not show the completeness of these two.", "12 hours. However, I would appreciate any thoughts on making my final choice.", "assignments right around the deadline, is it advisable not to set deadline that", "solving the original question as posed. There is no immediate hurry, since the", "on Academia. It has attracted several very interesting answers, high-quality IMHO and that", "1. Choose between one or the other. This would not be fair to", "moral standpoint. 3. Choose somebody else's answer. There are several other very good", "the question has only been up for around 12 hours. However, I would", "be fair to either in my view, since their replies are truly complementary,", "recently asked this question [Knowing that most students submit assignments right around the", "would leave the question eternally open, when in fact I think the elements", "truly complementary, i.e. make sense when taken together. 2. Choose neither, and post", "my favorite choice from a moral standpoint. 3. Choose somebody else's answer. There", "standpoint. 3. Choose somebody else's answer. There are several other very good answers,", "answers that I feel address complementary aspects of an \"ideal\" reply. Naturally, I", "neither, and post my own solution \"cannibalizing\" elements of both. Not my favorite", "to adopt when choosing which *most helpful* answer to accept? I have been", "choose, accepting no answer. But this would leave the question eternally open, when", "not to set deadline that is very late at night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a) on Academia. It", "been abundantly up-voted by the community. There are two specific answers that I", "in the answers go quite a long way to solving the original question", "original question as posed. There is no immediate hurry, since the question has", "late at night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a) on Academia. It has attracted several very interesting answers, high-quality", "one or the other. This would not be fair to either in my", "answers, but they just do not show the completeness of these two. 4.", "up for around 12 hours. However, I would appreciate any thoughts on making", "both, since both are of interest to a potential viewer of the question.", "and post my own solution \"cannibalizing\" elements of both. Not my favorite choice", "completeness of these two. 4. Choose not to choose, accepting no answer. But", "right around the deadline, is it advisable not to set deadline that is", "either in my view, since their replies are truly complementary, i.e. make sense", "Choose not to choose, accepting no answer. But this would leave the question", "their replies are truly complementary, i.e. make sense when taken together. 2. Choose", "when taken together. 2. Choose neither, and post my own solution \"cannibalizing\" elements", "two specific answers that I feel address complementary aspects of an \"ideal\" reply.", "a potential viewer of the question. My question is: what strategy to adopt", "have up-voted both, since both are of interest to a potential viewer of", "taken together. 2. Choose neither, and post my own solution \"cannibalizing\" elements of", "to choose, accepting no answer. But this would leave the question eternally open,", "in fact I think the elements given in the answers go quite a", "as posed. There is no immediate hurry, since the question has only been", "question. My question is: what strategy to adopt when choosing which *most helpful*", "these two. 4. Choose not to choose, accepting no answer. But this would", "posed. There is no immediate hurry, since the question has only been up", "in my view, since their replies are truly complementary, i.e. make sense when", "\"cannibalizing\" elements of both. Not my favorite choice from a moral standpoint. 3.", "together. 2. Choose neither, and post my own solution \"cannibalizing\" elements of both.", "has attracted several very interesting answers, high-quality IMHO and that have been abundantly", "set deadline that is very late at night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a) on Academia. It has attracted", "Academia. It has attracted several very interesting answers, high-quality IMHO and that have", "several options: 1. Choose between one or the other. This would not be", "to accept? I have been considering several options: 1. Choose between one or", "replies are truly complementary, i.e. make sense when taken together. 2. Choose neither,", "the question eternally open, when in fact I think the elements given in", "have recently asked this question [Knowing that most students submit assignments right around", "way to solving the original question as posed. There is no immediate hurry,", "attracted several very interesting answers, high-quality IMHO and that have been abundantly up-voted", "other. This would not be fair to either in my view, since their", "address complementary aspects of an \"ideal\" reply. Naturally, I have up-voted both, since", "accepting no answer. But this would leave the question eternally open, when in", "answer. But this would leave the question eternally open, when in fact I", "the community. There are two specific answers that I feel address complementary aspects", "fact I think the elements given in the answers go quite a long", "4. Choose not to choose, accepting no answer. But this would leave the", "There are two specific answers that I feel address complementary aspects of an", "up-voted by the community. There are two specific answers that I feel address", "potential viewer of the question. My question is: what strategy to adopt when", "options: 1. Choose between one or the other. This would not be fair", "Choose neither, and post my own solution \"cannibalizing\" elements of both. Not my", "it advisable not to set deadline that is very late at night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a) on", "asked this question [Knowing that most students submit assignments right around the deadline,", "choosing which *most helpful* answer to accept? I have been considering several options:", "but they just do not show the completeness of these two. 4. Choose", "just do not show the completeness of these two. 4. Choose not to", "at night?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/50035/knowing-that-most-students-submit-assignments-right-around-the-deadline-is-it-a) on Academia. It has attracted several very interesting answers, high-quality IMHO", "this would leave the question eternally open, when in fact I think the", "IMHO and that have been abundantly up-voted by the community. There are two", "that I feel address complementary aspects of an \"ideal\" reply. Naturally, I have", "elements given in the answers go quite a long way to solving the", "which *most helpful* answer to accept? I have been considering several options: 1.", "3. Choose somebody else's answer. There are several other very good answers, but", "from a moral standpoint. 3. Choose somebody else's answer. There are several other", "answer to accept? I have been considering several options: 1. Choose between one", "students submit assignments right around the deadline, is it advisable not to set", "the other. This would not be fair to either in my view, since", "eternally open, when in fact I think the elements given in the answers", "I have recently asked this question [Knowing that most students submit assignments right", "since both are of interest to a potential viewer of the question. My", "Choose somebody else's answer. There are several other very good answers, but they", "question eternally open, when in fact I think the elements given in the", "are two specific answers that I feel address complementary aspects of an \"ideal\"", "There are several other very good answers, but they just do not show", "the deadline, is it advisable not to set deadline that is very late", "a moral standpoint. 3. Choose somebody else's answer. There are several other very", "viewer of the question. My question is: what strategy to adopt when choosing", "not to choose, accepting no answer. But this would leave the question eternally", "a long way to solving the original question as posed. There is no", "the original question as posed. There is no immediate hurry, since the question", "abundantly up-voted by the community. There are two specific answers that I feel" ]
[ "was envisioning something like a drop-down menu when asking a question, or at", "it had not occurred to the poster that this information was relevant. Now", "relevant? I was envisioning something like a drop-down menu when asking a question,", "add this – but this causes a delay and gets a bit repetitive.", "a question, or at least a line reminding posters that it might be", "not occurred to the poster that this information was relevant. Now one can", "the country which is relevant? I was envisioning something like a drop-down menu", "comments to add this – but this causes a delay and gets a", "Now one can of course ask in the comments to add this –", "widely between countries](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), and answers will depend heavily on this context. I have", "asking a question, or at least a line reminding posters that it might", "way to encourage posters to state the country which is relevant? I was", "which is relevant? I was envisioning something like a drop-down menu when asking", "Is there a way to encourage posters to state the country which is", "encourage posters to state the country which is relevant? I was envisioning something", "because it had not occurred to the poster that this information was relevant.", "something like a drop-down menu when asking a question, or at least a", "gets a bit repetitive. Is there a way to encourage posters to state", "can of course ask in the comments to add this – but this", "course ask in the comments to add this – but this causes a", "the comments to add this – but this causes a delay and gets", "cultures vary widely between countries](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), and answers will depend heavily on this context.", "this information was relevant. Now one can of course ask in the comments", "come across many questions, where the country has not been stated – presumably", "occurred to the poster that this information was relevant. Now one can of", "that this information was relevant. Now one can of course ask in the", "on this context. I have come across many questions, where the country has", "there a way to encourage posters to state the country which is relevant?", "the country has not been stated – presumably because it had not occurred", "across many questions, where the country has not been stated – presumably because", "where the country has not been stated – presumably because it had not", "between countries](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), and answers will depend heavily on this context. I have come", "was relevant. Now one can of course ask in the comments to add", "to add this – but this causes a delay and gets a bit", "a way to encourage posters to state the country which is relevant? I", "a drop-down menu when asking a question, or at least a line reminding", "not been stated – presumably because it had not occurred to the poster", "this causes a delay and gets a bit repetitive. Is there a way", "in the comments to add this – but this causes a delay and", "bit repetitive. Is there a way to encourage posters to state the country", "and gets a bit repetitive. Is there a way to encourage posters to", "answers will depend heavily on this context. I have come across many questions,", "presumably because it had not occurred to the poster that this information was", "many questions, where the country has not been stated – presumably because it", "– presumably because it had not occurred to the poster that this information", "posters to state the country which is relevant? I was envisioning something like", "depend heavily on this context. I have come across many questions, where the", "heavily on this context. I have come across many questions, where the country", "relevant. Now one can of course ask in the comments to add this", "a delay and gets a bit repetitive. Is there a way to encourage", "country which is relevant? I was envisioning something like a drop-down menu when", "a bit repetitive. Is there a way to encourage posters to state the", "been stated – presumably because it had not occurred to the poster that", "poster that this information was relevant. Now one can of course ask in", "but this causes a delay and gets a bit repetitive. Is there a", "questions, where the country has not been stated – presumably because it had", "to the poster that this information was relevant. Now one can of course", "countries](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), and answers will depend heavily on this context. I have come across", "[Academic systems and cultures vary widely between countries](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), and answers will depend heavily", "and answers will depend heavily on this context. I have come across many", "will depend heavily on this context. I have come across many questions, where", "delay and gets a bit repetitive. Is there a way to encourage posters", "one can of course ask in the comments to add this – but", "information was relevant. Now one can of course ask in the comments to", "like a drop-down menu when asking a question, or at least a line", "systems and cultures vary widely between countries](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), and answers will depend heavily on", "drop-down menu when asking a question, or at least a line reminding posters", "menu when asking a question, or at least a line reminding posters that", "repetitive. Is there a way to encourage posters to state the country which", "I was envisioning something like a drop-down menu when asking a question, or", "country has not been stated – presumably because it had not occurred to", "the poster that this information was relevant. Now one can of course ask", "of course ask in the comments to add this – but this causes", "to state the country which is relevant? I was envisioning something like a", "this – but this causes a delay and gets a bit repetitive. Is", "– but this causes a delay and gets a bit repetitive. Is there", "causes a delay and gets a bit repetitive. Is there a way to", "envisioning something like a drop-down menu when asking a question, or at least", "when asking a question, or at least a line reminding posters that it", "to encourage posters to state the country which is relevant? I was envisioning", "I have come across many questions, where the country has not been stated", "is relevant? I was envisioning something like a drop-down menu when asking a", "and cultures vary widely between countries](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), and answers will depend heavily on this", "stated – presumably because it had not occurred to the poster that this", "vary widely between countries](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), and answers will depend heavily on this context. I", "state the country which is relevant? I was envisioning something like a drop-down", "this context. I have come across many questions, where the country has not", "had not occurred to the poster that this information was relevant. Now one", "has not been stated – presumably because it had not occurred to the", "question, or at least a line reminding posters that it might be relevant.", "context. I have come across many questions, where the country has not been", "ask in the comments to add this – but this causes a delay", "have come across many questions, where the country has not been stated –" ]
[ "asking a question (or edit the tags of a question when having less", "on [Anime & Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905). Now, we have a handful of tags that are", "what feels like 100 questions in the last months. Would it be possible", "tagged 'professors'\"), [conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference \"show questions tagged 'conference'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\").", "feels like 100 questions in the last months. Would it be possible to", "handful of tags that are prone to being misused, namely [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions", "this box is site-specific, for example it is individualised on [Anime & Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905).", "'masters'\"), [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"), [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show", "tagged 'students'\"), [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference \"show questions tagged 'conference'\") and", "is individualised on [Anime & Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905). Now, we have a handful of tags", "you might want to cannibalise [this help text](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1679/7734) I wrote on *Welcome to", "how-to-tag help box warning users not to misuse these tags, do we actually", "tag* appears on the right, showing some general help on tagging. The content", "possible to add a paragraph or two to the how-to-tag help box warning", "'graduate-school'\"). In fact I removed the [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\") from what", "[graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\"). In fact I removed the [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions", "tagged 'phd'\"), [masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters \"show questions tagged 'masters'\"), [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"), [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research", "of a question when having less than 2 k), a box *how to", "questions tagged 'conference'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\"). In fact I removed", "tags of a question when having less than 2 k), a box *how", "misuse these tags, do we actually want this and if yes, how should", "the tags of a question when having less than 2 k), a box", "[research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"), [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions", "\"show questions tagged 'publications'\"), [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged", "questions tagged 'publications'\"), [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"),", "'students'\"), [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference \"show questions tagged 'conference'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school", "to tag* appears on the right, showing some general help on tagging. The", "tagged 'conference'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\"). In fact I removed the", "removed the [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\") from what feels like 100 questions", "that are prone to being misused, namely [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters", "right, showing some general help on tagging. The content of this box is", "be worded? With respect to the latter, you might want to cannibalise [this", "try to edit the tags when asking a question (or edit the tags", "tagged 'research'\"), [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"), [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students", "might want to cannibalise [this help text](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1679/7734) I wrote on *Welcome to Academia", "to the how-to-tag help box warning users not to misuse these tags, do", "respect to the latter, you might want to cannibalise [this help text](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1679/7734) I", "question when having less than 2 k), a box *how to tag* appears", "[thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"), [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions", "appears on the right, showing some general help on tagging. The content of", "Would it be possible to add a paragraph or two to the how-to-tag", "questions tagged 'graduate-school'\"). In fact I removed the [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\")", "2 k), a box *how to tag* appears on the right, showing some", "'phd'\"), [masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters \"show questions tagged 'masters'\"), [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"), [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show", "and if yes, how should this help text be worded? With respect to", "the last months. Would it be possible to add a paragraph or two", "tags when asking a question (or edit the tags of a question when", "'thesis'\"), [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"), [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show", "[conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference \"show questions tagged 'conference'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\"). In fact", "tagged 'masters'\"), [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"), [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications", "\"show questions tagged 'conference'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\"). In fact I", "tagged 'research'\") from what feels like 100 questions in the last months. Would", "example it is individualised on [Anime & Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905). Now, we have a handful", "questions in the last months. Would it be possible to add a paragraph", "the latter, you might want to cannibalise [this help text](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1679/7734) I wrote on", "box warning users not to misuse these tags, do we actually want this", "\"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference \"show questions tagged 'conference'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions", "to misuse these tags, do we actually want this and if yes, how", "a handful of tags that are prone to being misused, namely [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show", "tagged 'graduate-school'\"). In fact I removed the [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\") from", "[this help text](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1679/7734) I wrote on *Welcome to Academia SE* on the same", "[Anime & Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905). Now, we have a handful of tags that are prone", "we actually want this and if yes, how should this help text be", "individualised on [Anime & Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905). Now, we have a handful of tags that", "With respect to the latter, you might want to cannibalise [this help text](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1679/7734)", "Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905). Now, we have a handful of tags that are prone to being", "this help text be worded? With respect to the latter, you might want", "the tags when asking a question (or edit the tags of a question", "it be possible to add a paragraph or two to the how-to-tag help", "help box warning users not to misuse these tags, do we actually want", "namely [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters \"show questions tagged 'masters'\"), [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show", "should this help text be worded? With respect to the latter, you might", "'conference'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\"). In fact I removed the [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research", "tagged 'publications'\"), [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors", "on tagging. The content of this box is site-specific, for example it is", "\"show questions tagged 'students'\"), [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference \"show questions tagged", "users not to misuse these tags, do we actually want this and if", "misused, namely [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters \"show questions tagged 'masters'\"), [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis", "in the last months. Would it be possible to add a paragraph or", "\"show questions tagged 'masters'\"), [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"), [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged", "want this and if yes, how should this help text be worded? With", "[masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters \"show questions tagged 'masters'\"), [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"), [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions", "when asking a question (or edit the tags of a question when having", "[research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\") from what feels like 100 questions in the", "be possible to add a paragraph or two to the how-to-tag help box", "like 100 questions in the last months. Would it be possible to add", "content of this box is site-specific, for example it is individualised on [Anime", "\"show questions tagged 'research'\") from what feels like 100 questions in the last", "k), a box *how to tag* appears on the right, showing some general", "edit the tags of a question when having less than 2 k), a", "if yes, how should this help text be worded? With respect to the", "have a handful of tags that are prone to being misused, namely [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd", "help on tagging. The content of this box is site-specific, for example it", "site-specific, for example it is individualised on [Anime & Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905). Now, we have", "some general help on tagging. The content of this box is site-specific, for", "than 2 k), a box *how to tag* appears on the right, showing", "this and if yes, how should this help text be worded? With respect", "(or edit the tags of a question when having less than 2 k),", "box is site-specific, for example it is individualised on [Anime & Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905). Now,", "you try to edit the tags when asking a question (or edit the", "yes, how should this help text be worded? With respect to the latter,", "\"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters \"show questions tagged 'masters'\"), [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged", "from what feels like 100 questions in the last months. Would it be", "questions tagged 'university'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"),", "showing some general help on tagging. The content of this box is site-specific,", "help text be worded? With respect to the latter, you might want to", "questions tagged 'masters'\"), [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"), [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"),", "the right, showing some general help on tagging. The content of this box", "to the latter, you might want to cannibalise [this help text](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1679/7734) I wrote", "the [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\") from what feels like 100 questions in", "a box *how to tag* appears on the right, showing some general help", "when having less than 2 k), a box *how to tag* appears on", "we have a handful of tags that are prone to being misused, namely", "for example it is individualised on [Anime & Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905). Now, we have a", "tagging. The content of this box is site-specific, for example it is individualised", "to being misused, namely [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters \"show questions tagged", "or two to the how-to-tag help box warning users not to misuse these", "\"show questions tagged 'university'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged", "When you try to edit the tags when asking a question (or edit", "questions tagged 'research'\") from what feels like 100 questions in the last months.", "actually want this and if yes, how should this help text be worded?", "want to cannibalise [this help text](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1679/7734) I wrote on *Welcome to Academia SE*", "Now, we have a handful of tags that are prone to being misused,", "questions tagged 'thesis'\"), [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"),", "two to the how-to-tag help box warning users not to misuse these tags,", "tagged 'university'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference", "warning users not to misuse these tags, do we actually want this and", "are prone to being misused, namely [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters \"show", "& Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905). Now, we have a handful of tags that are prone to", "*how to tag* appears on the right, showing some general help on tagging.", "the how-to-tag help box warning users not to misuse these tags, do we", "having less than 2 k), a box *how to tag* appears on the", "a paragraph or two to the how-to-tag help box warning users not to", "of this box is site-specific, for example it is individualised on [Anime &", "is site-specific, for example it is individualised on [Anime & Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905). Now, we", "of tags that are prone to being misused, namely [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged", "In fact I removed the [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\") from what feels", "questions tagged 'professors'\"), [conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference \"show questions tagged 'conference'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged", "latter, you might want to cannibalise [this help text](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1679/7734) I wrote on *Welcome", "questions tagged 'students'\"), [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference \"show questions tagged 'conference'\")", "\"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\"). In fact I removed the [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged", "[students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference \"show questions", "'publications'\"), [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show", "add a paragraph or two to the how-to-tag help box warning users not", "help text](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1679/7734) I wrote on *Welcome to Academia SE* on the same topic.", "fact I removed the [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\") from what feels like", "being misused, namely [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters \"show questions tagged 'masters'\"),", "less than 2 k), a box *how to tag* appears on the right,", "text be worded? With respect to the latter, you might want to cannibalise", "a question when having less than 2 k), a box *how to tag*", "do we actually want this and if yes, how should this help text", "to add a paragraph or two to the how-to-tag help box warning users", "how should this help text be worded? With respect to the latter, you", "general help on tagging. The content of this box is site-specific, for example", "to cannibalise [this help text](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1679/7734) I wrote on *Welcome to Academia SE* on", "'professors'\"), [conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference \"show questions tagged 'conference'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\"). In", "and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show questions tagged 'graduate-school'\"). In fact I removed the [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show", "a question (or edit the tags of a question when having less than", "'research'\"), [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"), [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show", "The content of this box is site-specific, for example it is individualised on", "questions tagged 'research'\"), [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"), [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"),", "I removed the [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\") from what feels like 100", "[phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters \"show questions tagged 'masters'\"), [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions", "[publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"), [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions", "edit the tags when asking a question (or edit the tags of a", "paragraph or two to the how-to-tag help box warning users not to misuse", "'research'\") from what feels like 100 questions in the last months. Would it", "\"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"), [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged", "100 questions in the last months. Would it be possible to add a", "on the right, showing some general help on tagging. The content of this", "prone to being misused, namely [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters \"show questions", "[professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference \"show questions tagged 'conference'\") and [graduate-school](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-school \"show", "cannibalise [this help text](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1679/7734) I wrote on *Welcome to Academia SE* on the", "'university'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\"), [conference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/conference \"show", "question (or edit the tags of a question when having less than 2", "it is individualised on [Anime & Manga](https://anime.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1141/14905). Now, we have a handful of", "to edit the tags when asking a question (or edit the tags of", "last months. Would it be possible to add a paragraph or two to", "worded? With respect to the latter, you might want to cannibalise [this help", "not to misuse these tags, do we actually want this and if yes,", "tagged 'thesis'\"), [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"), [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university", "box *how to tag* appears on the right, showing some general help on", "months. Would it be possible to add a paragraph or two to the", "tags, do we actually want this and if yes, how should this help", "tags that are prone to being misused, namely [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"),", "\"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"), [university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged", "questions tagged 'phd'\"), [masters](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/masters \"show questions tagged 'masters'\"), [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"),", "these tags, do we actually want this and if yes, how should this", "[university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/university \"show questions tagged 'university'\"), [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\"), [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions" ]
[ "if I can ask a question related to **How** and **Why** to pursue", "says **For academics and those who enrolled in higher education**. I just wanted", "who enrolled in higher education**. I just wanted to know that if I", "question related to **How** and **Why** to pursue a course (country specific) ?", "and those who enrolled in higher education**. I just wanted to know that", "I can ask a question related to **How** and **Why** to pursue a", "higher education**. I just wanted to know that if I can ask a", "wanted to know that if I can ask a question related to **How**", "education**. I just wanted to know that if I can ask a question", "those who enrolled in higher education**. I just wanted to know that if", "**For academics and those who enrolled in higher education**. I just wanted to", "can ask a question related to **How** and **Why** to pursue a course", "academics and those who enrolled in higher education**. I just wanted to know", "to know that if I can ask a question related to **How** and", "that if I can ask a question related to **How** and **Why** to", "a question related to **How** and **Why** to pursue a course (country specific)", "*Academia* says **For academics and those who enrolled in higher education**. I just", "ask a question related to **How** and **Why** to pursue a course (country", "know that if I can ask a question related to **How** and **Why**", "just wanted to know that if I can ask a question related to", "I just wanted to know that if I can ask a question related", "enrolled in higher education**. I just wanted to know that if I can", "in higher education**. I just wanted to know that if I can ask" ]
[ "with, downvote suggestions you disagree with. Post one answer per warning. General ideas", "to state their field for questions where answers are often field-specific. * You", "suggestions you agree with, downvote suggestions you disagree with. Post one answer per", "questions tagged 'phd'\") or [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"). Even if you regard", "and thus certain tags may be misrepresented (depending on the ratio of closed", "are deleted). Also remember that some tags are just misused. The current leaders", "if any, do we want such tag alerts? I suggest following [this procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802):", "questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\"). * Relatedly, we can remind users to state their field", "to help them avoid common mistakes in the tag they’re using (e.g. SQL", "downvote suggestions you disagree with. Post one answer per warning. General ideas and", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png) (More information on this [here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802), from which the above", "users with just-in-time information to help them avoid common mistakes in the tag", "corresponding warning and a rationale. Upvote suggestions you agree with, downvote suggestions you", "have to ask for the country, such as [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\").", "deleted). Also remember that some tags are just misused. The current leaders in", "avoid common mistakes in the tag they’re using (e.g. SQL questions should mention", "some tags are just misused. The current leaders in this query are [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd", "a hot candidate would be tags used for questions where we often have", "questions should mention the engine they use). Here’s what they look like: [![enter", "be misrepresented (depending on the ratio of closed question that are deleted). Also", "the corresponding warning and a rationale. Upvote suggestions you agree with, downvote suggestions", "tag they’re using (e.g. SQL questions should mention the engine they use). Here’s", "you want a tag to have such a warning, post an answer to", "* You can use [this query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20) to obtain the tags for which we", "study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734) So, a hot candidate would be tags used for questions where we", "Stack Exchange employee [indicated](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1873/how-can-we-encourage-posters-to-mention-their-country-of-study-work?cb=1#comment7785_1876) that we might get so-called tag warnings, if we", "tagged 'publications'\"). * We could use tag warnings to prevent the misuse of", "* The whole suggestion came up during the discussion: [How can we encourage", "get so-called tag warnings, if we want them. These warnings are meant to", "have such a warning, post an answer to this question containing the tag,", "are [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\") and [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications", "tags may be misrepresented (depending on the ratio of closed question that are", "[this procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802): If you want a tag to have such a warning, post", "obtain the tags for which we have most closed questions, i.e., possible problem", "information to help them avoid common mistakes in the tag they’re using (e.g.", "problem tags. Note that [this excludes deleted questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554) and thus certain tags may", "regard this as overkill, consider it for tags where you want a warning", "misrepresented (depending on the ratio of closed question that are deleted). Also remember", "such as [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\"). * Relatedly, we can remind users", "suggestion came up during the discussion: [How can we encourage posters to mention", "\"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"). Even if you regard this as overkill, consider it", "misused. The current leaders in this query are [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"),", "if we want them. These warnings are meant to provide users with just-in-time", "this query are [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\")", "in this query are [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged", "inspiration ----------------------------- * The whole suggestion came up during the discussion: [How can", "query are [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\") and", "'phd'\") or [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"). Even if you regard this as", "You can use [this query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20) to obtain the tags for which we have", "Introduction ------------ In another discussion, a Stack Exchange employee [indicated](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1873/how-can-we-encourage-posters-to-mention-their-country-of-study-work?cb=1#comment7785_1876) that we might", "that we might get so-called tag warnings, if we want them. These warnings", "(e.g. SQL questions should mention the engine they use). Here’s what they look", "we want them. These warnings are meant to provide users with just-in-time information", "up during the discussion: [How can we encourage posters to mention their country", "hot candidate would be tags used for questions where we often have to", "a tag to have such a warning, post an answer to this question", "do we want such tag alerts? I suggest following [this procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802): If you", "[this query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20) to obtain the tags for which we have most closed questions,", "used for questions where we often have to ask for the country, such", "to ask for the country, such as [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\"). *", "which we have most closed questions, i.e., possible problem tags. Note that [this", "we often have to ask for the country, such as [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions", "certain tags may be misrepresented (depending on the ratio of closed question that", "candidate would be tags used for questions where we often have to ask", "warnings are meant to provide users with just-in-time information to help them avoid", "tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734) such as [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\")", "and a rationale. Upvote suggestions you agree with, downvote suggestions you disagree with.", "mention the engine they use). Here’s what they look like: [![enter image description", "\"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\") and [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions", "agree with, downvote suggestions you disagree with. Post one answer per warning. General", "on the ratio of closed question that are deleted). Also remember that some", "the tag they’re using (e.g. SQL questions should mention the engine they use).", "rationale. Upvote suggestions you agree with, downvote suggestions you disagree with. Post one", "leaders in this query are [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions", "for which we have most closed questions, i.e., possible problem tags. Note that", "of rather [general tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734) such as [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show", "should mention the engine they use). Here’s what they look like: [![enter image", "look like: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png) (More information on this [here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802), from which", "that some tags are just misused. The current leaders in this query are", "Here’s what they look like: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png) (More information on this", "posters to mention their country of study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734) So, a hot candidate would be", "If you want a tag to have such a warning, post an answer", "could use tag warnings to prevent the misuse of rather [general tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734) such", "were taken.) Question -------- For which tags, if any, do we want such", "field for questions where answers are often field-specific. * You can use [this", "tags used for questions where we often have to ask for the country,", "can use [this query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20) to obtain the tags for which we have most", "[graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\"). * Relatedly, we can remind users to state", "tags for which we have most closed questions, i.e., possible problem tags. Note", "'graduate-admissions'\") and [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"). * We could use tag warnings", "\"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") or [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions", "this question containing the tag, the corresponding warning and a rationale. Upvote suggestions", "questions tagged 'thesis'\"). Even if you regard this as overkill, consider it for", "The current leaders in this query are [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions", "The whole suggestion came up during the discussion: [How can we encourage posters", "possible problem tags. Note that [this excludes deleted questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554) and thus certain tags", "deleted questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554) and thus certain tags may be misrepresented (depending on the ratio", "any, do we want such tag alerts? I suggest following [this procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802): If", "query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20) to obtain the tags for which we have most closed questions, i.e.,", "Note that [this excludes deleted questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554) and thus certain tags may be misrepresented", "you regard this as overkill, consider it for tags where you want a", "(More information on this [here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802), from which the above text and image were", "the engine they use). Here’s what they look like: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png) (More information on this [here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802), from which the above text and", "where we often have to ask for the country, such as [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show", "'phd'\"), [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\") and [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"). *", "the above text and image were taken.) Question -------- For which tags, if", "or [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"). Even if you regard this as overkill,", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png) (More information on this [here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802), from which the above text", "they use). Here’s what they look like: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png) (More information", "mention their country of study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734) So, a hot candidate would be tags used", "\"show questions tagged 'phd'\") or [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"). Even if you", "use [this query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20) to obtain the tags for which we have most closed", "often field-specific. * You can use [this query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20) to obtain the tags for", "want a tag to have such a warning, post an answer to this", "such as [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") or", "[How can we encourage posters to mention their country of study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734) So, a", "tagged 'phd'\"), [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\") and [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\").", "in the tag they’re using (e.g. SQL questions should mention the engine they", "use). Here’s what they look like: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png) (More information on", "which tags, if any, do we want such tag alerts? I suggest following", "closed question that are deleted). Also remember that some tags are just misused.", "warnings to prevent the misuse of rather [general tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734) such as [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show", "this [here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802), from which the above text and image were taken.) Question --------", "* Relatedly, we can remind users to state their field for questions where", "that are deleted). Also remember that some tags are just misused. The current", "country, such as [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\"). * Relatedly, we can remind", "like: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png) (More information on this [here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802), from which the", "with just-in-time information to help them avoid common mistakes in the tag they’re", "most closed questions, i.e., possible problem tags. Note that [this excludes deleted questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554)", "Exchange employee [indicated](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1873/how-can-we-encourage-posters-to-mention-their-country-of-study-work?cb=1#comment7785_1876) that we might get so-called tag warnings, if we want", "tag to have such a warning, post an answer to this question containing", "country of study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734) So, a hot candidate would be tags used for questions", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png) (More information on this [here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802), from which the above text and image", "tagged 'graduate-admissions'\"). * Relatedly, we can remind users to state their field for", "during the discussion: [How can we encourage posters to mention their country of", "overkill, consider it for tags where you want a warning for other reasons.", "and image were taken.) Question -------- For which tags, if any, do we", "of study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734) So, a hot candidate would be tags used for questions where", "\"show questions tagged 'publications'\"). * We could use tag warnings to prevent the", "For which tags, if any, do we want such tag alerts? I suggest", "which the above text and image were taken.) Question -------- For which tags,", "Also remember that some tags are just misused. The current leaders in this", "for questions where we often have to ask for the country, such as", "so-called tag warnings, if we want them. These warnings are meant to provide", "[graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\") and [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"). * We", "you agree with, downvote suggestions you disagree with. Post one answer per warning.", "another discussion, a Stack Exchange employee [indicated](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1873/how-can-we-encourage-posters-to-mention-their-country-of-study-work?cb=1#comment7785_1876) that we might get so-called tag", "tagged 'graduate-admissions'\") and [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"). * We could use tag", "to have such a warning, post an answer to this question containing the", "[research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") or [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show", "answers are often field-specific. * You can use [this query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20) to obtain the", "where answers are often field-specific. * You can use [this query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20) to obtain", "as [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") or [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis", "These warnings are meant to provide users with just-in-time information to help them", "are meant to provide users with just-in-time information to help them avoid common", "want such tag alerts? I suggest following [this procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802): If you want a", "the discussion: [How can we encourage posters to mention their country of study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734)", "ask for the country, such as [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\"). * Relatedly,", "to prevent the misuse of rather [general tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734) such as [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions", "question containing the tag, the corresponding warning and a rationale. Upvote suggestions you", "[this excludes deleted questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554) and thus certain tags may be misrepresented (depending on", "tags, if any, do we want such tag alerts? I suggest following [this", "encourage posters to mention their country of study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734) So, a hot candidate would", "discussion, a Stack Exchange employee [indicated](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1873/how-can-we-encourage-posters-to-mention-their-country-of-study-work?cb=1#comment7785_1876) that we might get so-called tag warnings,", "as overkill, consider it for tags where you want a warning for other", "containing the tag, the corresponding warning and a rationale. Upvote suggestions you agree", "alerts? I suggest following [this procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802): If you want a tag to have", "remind users to state their field for questions where answers are often field-specific.", "questions where we often have to ask for the country, such as [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions", "warning and a rationale. Upvote suggestions you agree with, downvote suggestions you disagree", "warnings, if we want them. These warnings are meant to provide users with", "rather [general tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734) such as [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions", "Question -------- For which tags, if any, do we want such tag alerts?", "the ratio of closed question that are deleted). Also remember that some tags", "thus certain tags may be misrepresented (depending on the ratio of closed question", "have most closed questions, i.e., possible problem tags. Note that [this excludes deleted", "the country, such as [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\"). * Relatedly, we can", "to mention their country of study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734) So, a hot candidate would be tags", "[general tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734) such as [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged", "they’re using (e.g. SQL questions should mention the engine they use). Here’s what", "we want such tag alerts? I suggest following [this procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802): If you want", "tagged 'phd'\") or [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"). Even if you regard this", "misuse of rather [general tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734) such as [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd", "want them. These warnings are meant to provide users with just-in-time information to", "and inspiration ----------------------------- * The whole suggestion came up during the discussion: [How", "one answer per warning. General ideas and inspiration ----------------------------- * The whole suggestion", "ratio of closed question that are deleted). Also remember that some tags are", "suggestions you disagree with. Post one answer per warning. General ideas and inspiration", "[phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\") and [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show", "they look like: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png) (More information on this [here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802), from", "-------- For which tags, if any, do we want such tag alerts? I", "if you regard this as overkill, consider it for tags where you want", "question that are deleted). Also remember that some tags are just misused. The", "questions tagged 'publications'\"). * We could use tag warnings to prevent the misuse", "tag warnings, if we want them. These warnings are meant to provide users", "procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802): If you want a tag to have such a warning, post an", "them avoid common mistakes in the tag they’re using (e.g. SQL questions should", "to obtain the tags for which we have most closed questions, i.e., possible", "above text and image were taken.) Question -------- For which tags, if any,", "answer to this question containing the tag, the corresponding warning and a rationale.", "[thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"). Even if you regard this as overkill, consider", "would be tags used for questions where we often have to ask for", "we encourage posters to mention their country of study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734) So, a hot candidate", "and [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"). * We could use tag warnings to", "tags. Note that [this excludes deleted questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554) and thus certain tags may be", "prevent the misuse of rather [general tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734) such as [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged", "warning. General ideas and inspiration ----------------------------- * The whole suggestion came up during", "'research'\"), [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") or [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"). Even", "'graduate-admissions'\"). * Relatedly, we can remind users to state their field for questions", "their country of study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734) So, a hot candidate would be tags used for", "------------ In another discussion, a Stack Exchange employee [indicated](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1873/how-can-we-encourage-posters-to-mention-their-country-of-study-work?cb=1#comment7785_1876) that we might get", "this as overkill, consider it for tags where you want a warning for", "meant to provide users with just-in-time information to help them avoid common mistakes", "\"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\"). * Relatedly, we can remind users to state their", "just misused. The current leaders in this query are [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged", "to provide users with just-in-time information to help them avoid common mistakes in", "such tag alerts? I suggest following [this procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802): If you want a tag", "[here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802), from which the above text and image were taken.) Question -------- For", "field-specific. * You can use [this query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20) to obtain the tags for which", "help them avoid common mistakes in the tag they’re using (e.g. SQL questions", "questions tagged 'phd'\"), [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\") and [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged", "use tag warnings to prevent the misuse of rather [general tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734) such as", "may be misrepresented (depending on the ratio of closed question that are deleted).", "post an answer to this question containing the tag, the corresponding warning and", "on this [here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802), from which the above text and image were taken.) Question", "users to state their field for questions where answers are often field-specific. *", "current leaders in this query are [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\"), [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show", "'publications'\"). * We could use tag warnings to prevent the misuse of rather", "can we encourage posters to mention their country of study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734) So, a hot", "questions tagged 'research'\"), [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") or [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged", "tags are just misused. The current leaders in this query are [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show", "a rationale. Upvote suggestions you agree with, downvote suggestions you disagree with. Post", "can remind users to state their field for questions where answers are often", "we might get so-called tag warnings, if we want them. These warnings are", "what they look like: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png) (More information on this [here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802),", "closed questions, i.e., possible problem tags. Note that [this excludes deleted questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554) and", "remember that some tags are just misused. The current leaders in this query", "warning, post an answer to this question containing the tag, the corresponding warning", "questions where answers are often field-specific. * You can use [this query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20) to", "with. Post one answer per warning. General ideas and inspiration ----------------------------- * The", "Upvote suggestions you agree with, downvote suggestions you disagree with. Post one answer", "taken.) Question -------- For which tags, if any, do we want such tag", "employee [indicated](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1873/how-can-we-encourage-posters-to-mention-their-country-of-study-work?cb=1#comment7785_1876) that we might get so-called tag warnings, if we want them.", "following [this procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802): If you want a tag to have such a warning,", "image were taken.) Question -------- For which tags, if any, do we want", "questions, i.e., possible problem tags. Note that [this excludes deleted questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554) and thus", "answer per warning. General ideas and inspiration ----------------------------- * The whole suggestion came", "'thesis'\"). Even if you regard this as overkill, consider it for tags where", "In another discussion, a Stack Exchange employee [indicated](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1873/how-can-we-encourage-posters-to-mention-their-country-of-study-work?cb=1#comment7785_1876) that we might get so-called", "per warning. General ideas and inspiration ----------------------------- * The whole suggestion came up", "an answer to this question containing the tag, the corresponding warning and a", "their field for questions where answers are often field-specific. * You can use", "of closed question that are deleted). Also remember that some tags are just", "Even if you regard this as overkill, consider it for tags where you", "from which the above text and image were taken.) Question -------- For which", "you disagree with. Post one answer per warning. General ideas and inspiration -----------------------------", "Post one answer per warning. General ideas and inspiration ----------------------------- * The whole", "information on this [here](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802), from which the above text and image were taken.)", "suggest following [this procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802): If you want a tag to have such a", "as [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\"). * Relatedly, we can remind users to", "came up during the discussion: [How can we encourage posters to mention their", "tagged 'research'\"), [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") or [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\").", "using (e.g. SQL questions should mention the engine they use). Here’s what they", "questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554) and thus certain tags may be misrepresented (depending on the ratio of", "(depending on the ratio of closed question that are deleted). Also remember that", "We could use tag warnings to prevent the misuse of rather [general tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734)", "tag warnings to prevent the misuse of rather [general tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734) such as [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research", "text and image were taken.) Question -------- For which tags, if any, do", "So, a hot candidate would be tags used for questions where we often", "\"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\") and [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"). * We could", "discussion: [How can we encourage posters to mention their country of study/work?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1873/7734) So,", "a warning, post an answer to this question containing the tag, the corresponding", "the misuse of rather [general tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1201/7734) such as [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"),", "the tags for which we have most closed questions, i.e., possible problem tags.", "often have to ask for the country, such as [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged", "excludes deleted questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554) and thus certain tags may be misrepresented (depending on the", "tag, the corresponding warning and a rationale. Upvote suggestions you agree with, downvote", "ideas and inspiration ----------------------------- * The whole suggestion came up during the discussion:", "[phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions tagged 'phd'\") or [thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/thesis \"show questions tagged 'thesis'\"). Even if", "tagged 'thesis'\"). Even if you regard this as overkill, consider it for tags", "disagree with. Post one answer per warning. General ideas and inspiration ----------------------------- *", "common mistakes in the tag they’re using (e.g. SQL questions should mention the", "such a warning, post an answer to this question containing the tag, the", "[indicated](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1873/how-can-we-encourage-posters-to-mention-their-country-of-study-work?cb=1#comment7785_1876) that we might get so-called tag warnings, if we want them. These", "a Stack Exchange employee [indicated](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1873/how-can-we-encourage-posters-to-mention-their-country-of-study-work?cb=1#comment7785_1876) that we might get so-called tag warnings, if", "engine they use). Here’s what they look like: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/AZhJW.png) (More", "Relatedly, we can remind users to state their field for questions where answers", "General ideas and inspiration ----------------------------- * The whole suggestion came up during the", "for the country, such as [graduate-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/graduate-admissions \"show questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\"). * Relatedly, we", "state their field for questions where answers are often field-specific. * You can", "might get so-called tag warnings, if we want them. These warnings are meant", "the tag, the corresponding warning and a rationale. Upvote suggestions you agree with,", "are just misused. The current leaders in this query are [phd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/phd \"show questions", "to this question containing the tag, the corresponding warning and a rationale. Upvote", "for questions where answers are often field-specific. * You can use [this query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20)", "questions tagged 'graduate-admissions'\") and [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"). * We could use", "tag alerts? I suggest following [this procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802): If you want a tag to", "be tags used for questions where we often have to ask for the", "* We could use tag warnings to prevent the misuse of rather [general", "them. These warnings are meant to provide users with just-in-time information to help", "I suggest following [this procedure](https://meta.askubuntu.com/q/14237/145802): If you want a tag to have such", "whole suggestion came up during the discussion: [How can we encourage posters to", "just-in-time information to help them avoid common mistakes in the tag they’re using", "[publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\"). * We could use tag warnings to prevent", "mistakes in the tag they’re using (e.g. SQL questions should mention the engine", "are often field-specific. * You can use [this query](https://data.stackexchange.com/academia/query/78395/most-closed-tags-in-stackoverflow-top-20) to obtain the tags", "SQL questions should mention the engine they use). Here’s what they look like:", "provide users with just-in-time information to help them avoid common mistakes in the", "----------------------------- * The whole suggestion came up during the discussion: [How can we", "i.e., possible problem tags. Note that [this excludes deleted questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554) and thus certain", "we can remind users to state their field for questions where answers are", "we have most closed questions, i.e., possible problem tags. Note that [this excludes", "that [this excludes deleted questions](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/78025/255554) and thus certain tags may be misrepresented (depending" ]
[ "degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) Apparently others believe that because the OP believes that this will", "variation of \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\" If we follow this route, then an OP can", "about wanting to have a undergrad humanities course requirement exemption to be off-topic", "it is primarily about undergraduate life. * [Is it reasonable to request an", "make the argument that it is on-topic just by mentioning \"grad school.\" So", "a better grad application, that it is on-topic. Isn't this just a variation", "get into grad school.*\" Isn't that the very core of boat programming? Thoughts?", "that it is on-topic. Isn't this just a variation of \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\" If", "this will lead to a better grad application, that it is on-topic. Isn't", "to a better grad application, that it is on-topic. Isn't this just a", "have to stay in a dorm?*\" would be on topic if the OP", "\"*... I won't be able to study hard enough to get into grad", "this route, then an OP can make the argument that it is on-topic", "believe that because the OP believes that this will lead to a better", "to be off-topic as it is primarily about undergraduate life. * [Is it", "that this will lead to a better grad application, that it is on-topic.", "from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) Apparently others believe that because the OP believes that", "the OP added \"*... I won't be able to study hard enough to", "humanities course requirement exemption to be off-topic as it is primarily about undergraduate", "because the OP believes that this will lead to a better grad application,", "follow this route, then an OP can make the argument that it is", "grad application, that it is on-topic. Isn't this just a variation of \"[boat", "to have a undergrad humanities course requirement exemption to be off-topic as it", "OP added \"*... I won't be able to study hard enough to get", "be on topic if the OP added \"*... I won't be able to", "mentioning \"grad school.\" So a question about \"*Why do I have to stay", "just by mentioning \"grad school.\" So a question about \"*Why do I have", "on-topic just by mentioning \"grad school.\" So a question about \"*Why do I", "Isn't this just a variation of \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\" If we follow this route,", "believes that this will lead to a better grad application, that it is", "to stay in a dorm?*\" would be on topic if the OP added", "is on-topic. Isn't this just a variation of \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\" If we follow", "the OP believes that this will lead to a better grad application, that", "topic if the OP added \"*... I won't be able to study hard", "\"grad school.\" So a question about \"*Why do I have to stay in", "to request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) Apparently others believe that because", "will lead to a better grad application, that it is on-topic. Isn't this", "school.\" So a question about \"*Why do I have to stay in a", "So a question about \"*Why do I have to stay in a dorm?*\"", "an OP can make the argument that it is on-topic just by mentioning", "application, that it is on-topic. Isn't this just a variation of \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\"", "this just a variation of \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\" If we follow this route, then", "is on-topic just by mentioning \"grad school.\" So a question about \"*Why do", "\"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\" If we follow this route, then an OP can make the", "a dorm?*\" would be on topic if the OP added \"*... I won't", "Apparently others believe that because the OP believes that this will lead to", "as it is primarily about undergraduate life. * [Is it reasonable to request", "of \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\" If we follow this route, then an OP can make", "the argument that it is on-topic just by mentioning \"grad school.\" So a", "request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) Apparently others believe that because the", "off-topic as it is primarily about undergraduate life. * [Is it reasonable to", "on-topic. Isn't this just a variation of \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\" If we follow this", "certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) Apparently others believe that because the OP believes that this", "by mentioning \"grad school.\" So a question about \"*Why do I have to", "requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) Apparently others believe that because the OP believes that this will lead", "can make the argument that it is on-topic just by mentioning \"grad school.\"", "exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) Apparently others believe that because the OP believes", "an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) Apparently others believe that because the OP", "that because the OP believes that this will lead to a better grad", "if the OP added \"*... I won't be able to study hard enough", "exemption to be off-topic as it is primarily about undergraduate life. * [Is", "to get into grad school.*\" Isn't that the very core of boat programming?", "[Is it reasonable to request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) Apparently others", "that it is on-topic just by mentioning \"grad school.\" So a question about", "\"*Why do I have to stay in a dorm?*\" would be on topic", "wanting to have a undergrad humanities course requirement exemption to be off-topic as", "do I have to stay in a dorm?*\" would be on topic if", "route, then an OP can make the argument that it is on-topic just", "question about wanting to have a undergrad humanities course requirement exemption to be", "I believe this question about wanting to have a undergrad humanities course requirement", "just a variation of \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\" If we follow this route, then an", "a undergrad humanities course requirement exemption to be off-topic as it is primarily", "would be on topic if the OP added \"*... I won't be able", "be off-topic as it is primarily about undergraduate life. * [Is it reasonable", "better grad application, that it is on-topic. Isn't this just a variation of", "about undergraduate life. * [Is it reasonable to request an exemption from certain", "to study hard enough to get into grad school.*\" Isn't that the very", "dorm?*\" would be on topic if the OP added \"*... I won't be", "stay in a dorm?*\" would be on topic if the OP added \"*...", "we follow this route, then an OP can make the argument that it", "on topic if the OP added \"*... I won't be able to study", "requirement exemption to be off-topic as it is primarily about undergraduate life. *", "I have to stay in a dorm?*\" would be on topic if the", "undergrad humanities course requirement exemption to be off-topic as it is primarily about", "OP can make the argument that it is on-topic just by mentioning \"grad", "a question about \"*Why do I have to stay in a dorm?*\" would", "is primarily about undergraduate life. * [Is it reasonable to request an exemption", "it is on-topic. Isn't this just a variation of \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\" If we", "in a dorm?*\" would be on topic if the OP added \"*... I", "be able to study hard enough to get into grad school.*\" Isn't that", "life. * [Is it reasonable to request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements)", "primarily about undergraduate life. * [Is it reasonable to request an exemption from", "undergraduate life. * [Is it reasonable to request an exemption from certain degree", "this question about wanting to have a undergrad humanities course requirement exemption to", "lead to a better grad application, that it is on-topic. Isn't this just", "* [Is it reasonable to request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) Apparently", "hard enough to get into grad school.*\" Isn't that the very core of", "others believe that because the OP believes that this will lead to a", "it is on-topic just by mentioning \"grad school.\" So a question about \"*Why", "OP believes that this will lead to a better grad application, that it", "then an OP can make the argument that it is on-topic just by", "believe this question about wanting to have a undergrad humanities course requirement exemption", "able to study hard enough to get into grad school.*\" Isn't that the", "a variation of \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\" If we follow this route, then an OP", "study hard enough to get into grad school.*\" Isn't that the very core", "argument that it is on-topic just by mentioning \"grad school.\" So a question", "I won't be able to study hard enough to get into grad school.*\"", "programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)?\" If we follow this route, then an OP can make the argument", "If we follow this route, then an OP can make the argument that", "about \"*Why do I have to stay in a dorm?*\" would be on", "course requirement exemption to be off-topic as it is primarily about undergraduate life.", "question about \"*Why do I have to stay in a dorm?*\" would be", "added \"*... I won't be able to study hard enough to get into", "enough to get into grad school.*\" Isn't that the very core of boat", "it reasonable to request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) Apparently others believe", "reasonable to request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) Apparently others believe that", "won't be able to study hard enough to get into grad school.*\" Isn't", "have a undergrad humanities course requirement exemption to be off-topic as it is" ]
[ "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school): the question is a \"boat-programming\" question. It is interesting that moderator aeismail", "in the way of this question: I have retracted my close vote. *Hats", "really interesting take suggested by RoboKaren [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school): the question is a \"boat-programming\" question.", "Exchange sites are community-driven. Therefore, as much as possible, the moderators try to", "reopen instead of acting unilaterally. > > > I agree with what aeismail", "states: > > Stack Exchange sites are community-driven. Therefore, as much as possible,", "such as programming questions, and so on). Otherwise, we prefer to wait until", "As of this writing, there have been only 3 close votes recast (not", "to leave decisions to the general community. We will act unilaterally in clear-cut", "the comments section. However, as I also pointed out above, the moderators here", "However, as I also pointed out above, the moderators here prefer to work", "I agree with what aeismail wrote in his answer above. But, unfortunately, that", "SE, and that I've probably missed something. Can someone explain why aesimail's actions", "deals with an undergraduate problem which cannot be generalized to graduate students, 2.", "In the linked meta question, aeismail states: > > Stack Exchange sites are", "going to stand in the way of this question: I have retracted my", "> > > In this particular instance, the close votes were entirely from", "be generalized to graduate students, 2. Any answers related to increasing OP's likelihood", "entirely from regular users; the moderators played no role in closing the question.", "it reasonable to request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) In my view,", "has several problems: 1. It deals with an undergraduate problem which cannot be", "support a reopening \"campaign\"; I've indicated this in the comments section. However, as", "general community. We will act unilaterally in clear-cut cases (abusive or spam posts,", "Moderator aeismail cast one of two reopen votes for the following question: [Is", "unfortunately, that is clearly not what happened in the case of the \"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\"", "not going to stand in the way of this question: I have retracted", "vote. *Hats off to aeismail for seeing the value in the question that", "explain why aesimail's actions on this question are good for this community-driven site?", "consensus standpoint, so I'd rather if several users voted to reopen instead of", "reopening \"campaign\"; I've indicated this in the comments section. However, as I also", "the value that the community places on the \"undergraduate\" question that started this", "\"undergraduate\" question that started this thread. As of this writing, there have been", "misjudged the value that the community places on the \"undergraduate\" question that started", "to work from a consensus standpoint, so I'd rather if several users voted", "try to leave decisions to the general community. We will act unilaterally in", "moderators played no role in closing the question. Personally, I agree that the", "possible, the moderators try to leave decisions to the general community. We will", "votes recast (not to mention several additional upvotes). I'm not going to stand", "would support a reopening \"campaign\"; I've indicated this in the comments section. However,", "question you've cited should be reopened, and would support a reopening \"campaign\"; I've", "he clearly explains his view on such matters [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732). In the linked meta", "way of this question: I have retracted my close vote. *Hats off to", "duplicates, completely off-topic questions such as programming questions, and so on). Otherwise, we", "only two reopen votes, when he clearly explains his view on such matters", "agree that the question you've cited should be reopened, and would support a", "to assume that there are good reasons for things which happen on Academia", "why aesimail's actions on this question are good for this community-driven site? ---", "question: [Is it reasonable to request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) In", "aeismail states: > > Stack Exchange sites are community-driven. Therefore, as much as", "writing, there have been only 3 close votes recast (not to mention several", "It seems that I've misjudged the value that the community places on the", "in the case of the \"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\" question. I like to assume that there", "add:** It seems that I've misjudged the value that the community places on", "reasonable to request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) In my view, this", "community. We will act unilaterally in clear-cut cases (abusive or spam posts, duplicates,", "Therefore, as much as possible, the moderators try to leave decisions to the", "(not to mention several additional upvotes). I'm not going to stand in the", "Personally, I agree that the question you've cited should be reopened, and would", "a \"boat-programming\" question. It is interesting that moderator aeismail cast one of only", "to increasing OP's likelihood of success strongly depends on institutional policies, and 3.", "good for this community-driven site? --- **Edited to add:** It seems that I've", "question has several problems: 1. It deals with an undergraduate problem which cannot", "the \"undergraduate\" question that started this thread. As of this writing, there have", "places on the \"undergraduate\" question that started this thread. As of this writing,", "completely off-topic questions such as programming questions, and so on). Otherwise, we prefer", "agree with what aeismail wrote in his answer above. But, unfortunately, that is", "aesimail's actions on this question are good for this community-driven site? --- **Edited", "to reopen instead of acting unilaterally. > > > I agree with what", "that the community places on the \"undergraduate\" question that started this thread. As", "from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) In my view, this question has several problems: 1.", "are good for this community-driven site? --- **Edited to add:** It seems that", "> > In this particular instance, the close votes were entirely from regular", "success strongly depends on institutional policies, and 3. A really interesting take suggested", "that is clearly not what happened in the case of the \"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\" question.", "also pointed out above, the moderators here prefer to work from a consensus", "of the \"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\" question. I like to assume that there are good reasons", "\"campaign\"; I've indicated this in the comments section. However, as I also pointed", "the following question: [Is it reasonable to request an exemption from certain degree", "aeismail cast one of two reopen votes for the following question: [Is it", "and 3. A really interesting take suggested by RoboKaren [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school): the question is", "A really interesting take suggested by RoboKaren [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school): the question is a \"boat-programming\"", "> In this particular instance, the close votes were entirely from regular users;", "act unilaterally in clear-cut cases (abusive or spam posts, duplicates, completely off-topic questions", "of this writing, there have been only 3 close votes recast (not to", "for things which happen on Academia SE, and that I've probably missed something.", "It deals with an undergraduate problem which cannot be generalized to graduate students,", "unilaterally in clear-cut cases (abusive or spam posts, duplicates, completely off-topic questions such", "to stand in the way of this question: I have retracted my close", "Any answers related to increasing OP's likelihood of success strongly depends on institutional", "question are good for this community-driven site? --- **Edited to add:** It seems", "a reopening \"campaign\"; I've indicated this in the comments section. However, as I", "so I'd rather if several users voted to reopen instead of acting unilaterally.", "which happen on Academia SE, and that I've probably missed something. Can someone", "the way of this question: I have retracted my close vote. *Hats off", "*Hats off to aeismail for seeing the value in the question that I", "and that I've probably missed something. Can someone explain why aesimail's actions on", "happen on Academia SE, and that I've probably missed something. Can someone explain", "indicated this in the comments section. However, as I also pointed out above,", "the case of the \"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\" question. I like to assume that there are", "and so on). Otherwise, we prefer to wait until there's a consensus. >", "close votes were entirely from regular users; the moderators played no role in", "I like to assume that there are good reasons for things which happen", "is a \"boat-programming\" question. It is interesting that moderator aeismail cast one of", "to add:** It seems that I've misjudged the value that the community places", "missed something. Can someone explain why aesimail's actions on this question are good", "question: I have retracted my close vote. *Hats off to aeismail for seeing", "this writing, there have been only 3 close votes recast (not to mention", "spam posts, duplicates, completely off-topic questions such as programming questions, and so on).", "to wait until there's a consensus. > > > In this particular instance,", "when he clearly explains his view on such matters [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732). In the linked", "posts, duplicates, completely off-topic questions such as programming questions, and so on). Otherwise,", "instance, the close votes were entirely from regular users; the moderators played no", "question. I like to assume that there are good reasons for things which", "the moderators try to leave decisions to the general community. We will act", "question. It is interesting that moderator aeismail cast one of only two reopen", "out above, the moderators here prefer to work from a consensus standpoint, so", "to the general community. We will act unilaterally in clear-cut cases (abusive or", "policies, and 3. A really interesting take suggested by RoboKaren [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school): the question", "votes for the following question: [Is it reasonable to request an exemption from", "interesting take suggested by RoboKaren [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school): the question is a \"boat-programming\" question. It", "community-driven. Therefore, as much as possible, the moderators try to leave decisions to", "answer above. But, unfortunately, that is clearly not what happened in the case", "played no role in closing the question. Personally, I agree that the question", "that moderator aeismail cast one of only two reopen votes, when he clearly", "moderators here prefer to work from a consensus standpoint, so I'd rather if", "the community places on the \"undergraduate\" question that started this thread. As of", "that the question you've cited should be reopened, and would support a reopening", "instead of acting unilaterally. > > > I agree with what aeismail wrote", "particular instance, the close votes were entirely from regular users; the moderators played", "have retracted my close vote. *Hats off to aeismail for seeing the value", "have been only 3 close votes recast (not to mention several additional upvotes).", "to aeismail for seeing the value in the question that I did not.*", "likelihood of success strongly depends on institutional policies, and 3. A really interesting", "wrote in his answer above. But, unfortunately, that is clearly not what happened", "as possible, the moderators try to leave decisions to the general community. We", "problem which cannot be generalized to graduate students, 2. Any answers related to", "my view, this question has several problems: 1. It deals with an undergraduate", "cannot be generalized to graduate students, 2. Any answers related to increasing OP's", "3 close votes recast (not to mention several additional upvotes). I'm not going", "case of the \"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\" question. I like to assume that there are good", "on). Otherwise, we prefer to wait until there's a consensus. > > >", "this particular instance, the close votes were entirely from regular users; the moderators", "aeismail wrote in his answer above. But, unfortunately, that is clearly not what", "as I also pointed out above, the moderators here prefer to work from", "so on). Otherwise, we prefer to wait until there's a consensus. > >", "reasons for things which happen on Academia SE, and that I've probably missed", "work from a consensus standpoint, so I'd rather if several users voted to", "votes were entirely from regular users; the moderators played no role in closing", "from a consensus standpoint, so I'd rather if several users voted to reopen", "off-topic questions such as programming questions, and so on). Otherwise, we prefer to", "retracted my close vote. *Hats off to aeismail for seeing the value in", "certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) In my view, this question has several problems: 1. It", "were entirely from regular users; the moderators played no role in closing the", "several users voted to reopen instead of acting unilaterally. > > > I", "with what aeismail wrote in his answer above. But, unfortunately, that is clearly", "I have retracted my close vote. *Hats off to aeismail for seeing the", "as programming questions, and so on). Otherwise, we prefer to wait until there's", "an undergraduate problem which cannot be generalized to graduate students, 2. Any answers", "the moderators here prefer to work from a consensus standpoint, so I'd rather", "something. Can someone explain why aesimail's actions on this question are good for", "no role in closing the question. Personally, I agree that the question you've", "prefer to work from a consensus standpoint, so I'd rather if several users", "additional upvotes). I'm not going to stand in the way of this question:", "matters [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732). In the linked meta question, aeismail states: > > Stack Exchange", "stand in the way of this question: I have retracted my close vote.", "by RoboKaren [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school): the question is a \"boat-programming\" question. It is interesting that", "to graduate students, 2. Any answers related to increasing OP's likelihood of success", "take suggested by RoboKaren [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school): the question is a \"boat-programming\" question. It is", "two reopen votes for the following question: [Is it reasonable to request an", "I've indicated this in the comments section. However, as I also pointed out", "acting unilaterally. > > > I agree with what aeismail wrote in his", "Can someone explain why aesimail's actions on this question are good for this", "started this thread. As of this writing, there have been only 3 close", "the moderators played no role in closing the question. Personally, I agree that", "regular users; the moderators played no role in closing the question. Personally, I", "In this particular instance, the close votes were entirely from regular users; the", "suggested by RoboKaren [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school): the question is a \"boat-programming\" question. It is interesting", "a consensus standpoint, so I'd rather if several users voted to reopen instead", "\"boat-programming\" question. It is interesting that moderator aeismail cast one of only two", "consensus. > > > In this particular instance, the close votes were entirely", "**Edited to add:** It seems that I've misjudged the value that the community", "answers related to increasing OP's likelihood of success strongly depends on institutional policies,", "here prefer to work from a consensus standpoint, so I'd rather if several", "above, the moderators here prefer to work from a consensus standpoint, so I'd", "close vote. *Hats off to aeismail for seeing the value in the question", "community-driven site? --- **Edited to add:** It seems that I've misjudged the value", "> I agree with what aeismail wrote in his answer above. But, unfortunately,", "I'd rather if several users voted to reopen instead of acting unilaterally. >", "which cannot be generalized to graduate students, 2. Any answers related to increasing", "this thread. As of this writing, there have been only 3 close votes", "good reasons for things which happen on Academia SE, and that I've probably", "moderator aeismail cast one of only two reopen votes, when he clearly explains", "clearly explains his view on such matters [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732). In the linked meta question,", "will act unilaterally in clear-cut cases (abusive or spam posts, duplicates, completely off-topic", "this community-driven site? --- **Edited to add:** It seems that I've misjudged the", "cited should be reopened, and would support a reopening \"campaign\"; I've indicated this", "students, 2. Any answers related to increasing OP's likelihood of success strongly depends", "> Stack Exchange sites are community-driven. Therefore, as much as possible, the moderators", "the \"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\" question. I like to assume that there are good reasons for", "on this question are good for this community-driven site? --- **Edited to add:**", "reopened, and would support a reopening \"campaign\"; I've indicated this in the comments", "the question is a \"boat-programming\" question. It is interesting that moderator aeismail cast", "cast one of two reopen votes for the following question: [Is it reasonable", "much as possible, the moderators try to leave decisions to the general community.", "my close vote. *Hats off to aeismail for seeing the value in the", "of two reopen votes for the following question: [Is it reasonable to request", "two reopen votes, when he clearly explains his view on such matters [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732).", "of only two reopen votes, when he clearly explains his view on such", "not what happened in the case of the \"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\" question. I like to", "the general community. We will act unilaterally in clear-cut cases (abusive or spam", "someone explain why aesimail's actions on this question are good for this community-driven", "on such matters [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732). In the linked meta question, aeismail states: > >", "upvotes). I'm not going to stand in the way of this question: I", "closing the question. Personally, I agree that the question you've cited should be", "a consensus. > > > In this particular instance, the close votes were", "several problems: 1. It deals with an undergraduate problem which cannot be generalized", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732). In the linked meta question, aeismail states: > > Stack Exchange sites", "if several users voted to reopen instead of acting unilaterally. > > >", "votes, when he clearly explains his view on such matters [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732). In the", "recast (not to mention several additional upvotes). I'm not going to stand in", "cases (abusive or spam posts, duplicates, completely off-topic questions such as programming questions,", "this question has several problems: 1. It deals with an undergraduate problem which", "to request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) In my view, this question", "comments section. However, as I also pointed out above, the moderators here prefer", "unilaterally. > > > I agree with what aeismail wrote in his answer", "We will act unilaterally in clear-cut cases (abusive or spam posts, duplicates, completely", "aeismail cast one of only two reopen votes, when he clearly explains his", "explains his view on such matters [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732). In the linked meta question, aeismail", "request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) In my view, this question has", "the linked meta question, aeismail states: > > Stack Exchange sites are community-driven.", "cast one of only two reopen votes, when he clearly explains his view", "in clear-cut cases (abusive or spam posts, duplicates, completely off-topic questions such as", "only 3 close votes recast (not to mention several additional upvotes). I'm not", "questions, and so on). Otherwise, we prefer to wait until there's a consensus.", "on the \"undergraduate\" question that started this thread. As of this writing, there", "reopen votes for the following question: [Is it reasonable to request an exemption", "depends on institutional policies, and 3. A really interesting take suggested by RoboKaren", "what aeismail wrote in his answer above. But, unfortunately, that is clearly not", "related to increasing OP's likelihood of success strongly depends on institutional policies, and", "strongly depends on institutional policies, and 3. A really interesting take suggested by", "programming questions, and so on). Otherwise, we prefer to wait until there's a", "or spam posts, duplicates, completely off-topic questions such as programming questions, and so", "requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) In my view, this question has several problems: 1. It deals with", "question is a \"boat-programming\" question. It is interesting that moderator aeismail cast one", "for this community-driven site? --- **Edited to add:** It seems that I've misjudged", "institutional policies, and 3. A really interesting take suggested by RoboKaren [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school): the", "on institutional policies, and 3. A really interesting take suggested by RoboKaren [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school):", "decisions to the general community. We will act unilaterally in clear-cut cases (abusive", "the close votes were entirely from regular users; the moderators played no role", "RoboKaren [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school): the question is a \"boat-programming\" question. It is interesting that moderator", "question. Personally, I agree that the question you've cited should be reopened, and", "that I've probably missed something. Can someone explain why aesimail's actions on this", "I've misjudged the value that the community places on the \"undergraduate\" question that", "problems: 1. It deals with an undergraduate problem which cannot be generalized to", "wait until there's a consensus. > > > In this particular instance, the", "until there's a consensus. > > > In this particular instance, the close", "what happened in the case of the \"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\" question. I like to assume", "clear-cut cases (abusive or spam posts, duplicates, completely off-topic questions such as programming", "view on such matters [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732). In the linked meta question, aeismail states: >", "mention several additional upvotes). I'm not going to stand in the way of", "one of two reopen votes for the following question: [Is it reasonable to", "But, unfortunately, that is clearly not what happened in the case of the", "\"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\" question. I like to assume that there are good reasons for things", "actions on this question are good for this community-driven site? --- **Edited to", "there's a consensus. > > > In this particular instance, the close votes", "degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) In my view, this question has several problems: 1. It deals", "1. It deals with an undergraduate problem which cannot be generalized to graduate", "In my view, this question has several problems: 1. It deals with an", "one of only two reopen votes, when he clearly explains his view on", "community places on the \"undergraduate\" question that started this thread. As of this", "his view on such matters [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732). In the linked meta question, aeismail states:", "role in closing the question. Personally, I agree that the question you've cited", "It is interesting that moderator aeismail cast one of only two reopen votes,", "seems that I've misjudged the value that the community places on the \"undergraduate\"", "like to assume that there are good reasons for things which happen on", "to mention several additional upvotes). I'm not going to stand in the way", "--- **Edited to add:** It seems that I've misjudged the value that the", "Stack Exchange sites are community-driven. Therefore, as much as possible, the moderators try", "voted to reopen instead of acting unilaterally. > > > I agree with", "there have been only 3 close votes recast (not to mention several additional", "I'm not going to stand in the way of this question: I have", "you've cited should be reopened, and would support a reopening \"campaign\"; I've indicated", "above. But, unfortunately, that is clearly not what happened in the case of", "clearly not what happened in the case of the \"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\" question. I like", "users voted to reopen instead of acting unilaterally. > > > I agree", "3. A really interesting take suggested by RoboKaren [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1888/undergrad-course-exemption-with-interest-in-grad-school): the question is a", "sites are community-driven. Therefore, as much as possible, the moderators try to leave", "following question: [Is it reasonable to request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements)", "value that the community places on the \"undergraduate\" question that started this thread.", "of acting unilaterally. > > > I agree with what aeismail wrote in", "that I've misjudged the value that the community places on the \"undergraduate\" question", "exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) In my view, this question has several problems:", "questions such as programming questions, and so on). Otherwise, we prefer to wait", "rather if several users voted to reopen instead of acting unilaterally. > >", "I also pointed out above, the moderators here prefer to work from a", "undergraduate problem which cannot be generalized to graduate students, 2. Any answers related", "meta question, aeismail states: > > Stack Exchange sites are community-driven. Therefore, as", "off to aeismail for seeing the value in the question that I did", "prefer to wait until there's a consensus. > > > In this particular", "this question are good for this community-driven site? --- **Edited to add:** It", "been only 3 close votes recast (not to mention several additional upvotes). I'm", "reopen votes, when he clearly explains his view on such matters [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732). In", "is interesting that moderator aeismail cast one of only two reopen votes, when", "this in the comments section. However, as I also pointed out above, the", "this question: I have retracted my close vote. *Hats off to aeismail for", "as much as possible, the moderators try to leave decisions to the general", "> > Stack Exchange sites are community-driven. Therefore, as much as possible, the", "moderators try to leave decisions to the general community. We will act unilaterally", "in closing the question. Personally, I agree that the question you've cited should", "assume that there are good reasons for things which happen on Academia SE,", "pointed out above, the moderators here prefer to work from a consensus standpoint,", "increasing OP's likelihood of success strongly depends on institutional policies, and 3. A", "leave decisions to the general community. We will act unilaterally in clear-cut cases", "question, aeismail states: > > Stack Exchange sites are community-driven. Therefore, as much", "that there are good reasons for things which happen on Academia SE, and", "be reopened, and would support a reopening \"campaign\"; I've indicated this in the", "should be reopened, and would support a reopening \"campaign\"; I've indicated this in", "> > I agree with what aeismail wrote in his answer above. But,", "(abusive or spam posts, duplicates, completely off-topic questions such as programming questions, and", "the question you've cited should be reopened, and would support a reopening \"campaign\";", "for the following question: [Is it reasonable to request an exemption from certain", "from regular users; the moderators played no role in closing the question. Personally,", "generalized to graduate students, 2. Any answers related to increasing OP's likelihood of", "several additional upvotes). I'm not going to stand in the way of this", "of success strongly depends on institutional policies, and 3. A really interesting take", "probably missed something. Can someone explain why aesimail's actions on this question are", "is clearly not what happened in the case of the \"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\" question. I", "thread. As of this writing, there have been only 3 close votes recast", "and would support a reopening \"campaign\"; I've indicated this in the comments section.", "interesting that moderator aeismail cast one of only two reopen votes, when he", "graduate students, 2. Any answers related to increasing OP's likelihood of success strongly", "[Is it reasonable to request an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) In my", "we prefer to wait until there's a consensus. > > > In this", "view, this question has several problems: 1. It deals with an undergraduate problem", "close votes recast (not to mention several additional upvotes). I'm not going to", "section. However, as I also pointed out above, the moderators here prefer to", "there are good reasons for things which happen on Academia SE, and that", "such matters [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/731/consistency-in-voting-to-close/732#732). In the linked meta question, aeismail states: > > Stack", "> > > I agree with what aeismail wrote in his answer above.", "things which happen on Academia SE, and that I've probably missed something. Can", "his answer above. But, unfortunately, that is clearly not what happened in the", "site? --- **Edited to add:** It seems that I've misjudged the value that", "linked meta question, aeismail states: > > Stack Exchange sites are community-driven. Therefore,", "Otherwise, we prefer to wait until there's a consensus. > > > In", "the question. Personally, I agree that the question you've cited should be reopened,", "question that started this thread. As of this writing, there have been only", "in the comments section. However, as I also pointed out above, the moderators", "of this question: I have retracted my close vote. *Hats off to aeismail", "I've probably missed something. Can someone explain why aesimail's actions on this question", "with an undergraduate problem which cannot be generalized to graduate students, 2. Any", "users; the moderators played no role in closing the question. Personally, I agree", "an exemption from certain degree requirements?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51529/is-it-reasonable-to-request-an-exemption-from-certain-degree-requirements) In my view, this question has several", "on Academia SE, and that I've probably missed something. Can someone explain why", "that started this thread. As of this writing, there have been only 3", "Academia SE, and that I've probably missed something. Can someone explain why aesimail's", "standpoint, so I'd rather if several users voted to reopen instead of acting", "are community-driven. Therefore, as much as possible, the moderators try to leave decisions", "I agree that the question you've cited should be reopened, and would support", "OP's likelihood of success strongly depends on institutional policies, and 3. A really", "2. Any answers related to increasing OP's likelihood of success strongly depends on", "in his answer above. But, unfortunately, that is clearly not what happened in", "happened in the case of the \"undergraduate-trying-to-get-out-of-a-humanities-requirement\" question. I like to assume that", "are good reasons for things which happen on Academia SE, and that I've" ]
[ "this question to read further details, but to keep all discussion in one", "the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following situation. There is an [Area", "one place, I suggest to express your opinions as answers to this question", "into the private beta. As we have learned today, [it will be closed", "* [Use Academia Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com) (this is not suggested for the first time, similar", "have learned today, [it will be closed this Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21). There are now two", "of Academia.SE community on the following situation. There is an [Area 51 proposal", "beta. As we have learned today, [it will be closed this Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21). There", "There is an [Area 51 proposal for OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science) which recently went into the", "[Second start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better) (think what we can do better and retry by starting another", "proposal for OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science) which recently went into the private beta. As we have", "been expressed [here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se)) Please follow the links from this question to read further", "discussion in one place, I suggest to express your opinions as answers to", "interesting to learn what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following", "the following situation. There is an [Area 51 proposal for OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science) which recently", "this Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21). There are now two alternatives: * [Second start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better) (think what we", "for the first time, similar idea already has been expressed [here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se)) Please follow", "to read further details, but to keep all discussion in one place, I", "for OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science) which recently went into the private beta. As we have learned", "has been expressed [here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se)) Please follow the links from this question to read", "community on the following situation. There is an [Area 51 proposal for OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science)", "already has been expressed [here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se)) Please follow the links from this question to", "question to read further details, but to keep all discussion in one place,", "recently went into the private beta. As we have learned today, [it will", "what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following situation. There is", "be closed this Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21). There are now two alternatives: * [Second start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better) (think", "similar idea already has been expressed [here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se)) Please follow the links from this", "first time, similar idea already has been expressed [here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se)) Please follow the links", "are now two alternatives: * [Second start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better) (think what we can do better", "time, similar idea already has been expressed [here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se)) Please follow the links from", "went into the private beta. As we have learned today, [it will be", "[Area 51 proposal for OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science) which recently went into the private beta. As", "another Area 51 proposal [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science)) * [Use Academia Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com) (this is not suggested", "the links from this question to read further details, but to keep all", "now two alternatives: * [Second start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better) (think what we can do better and", "[Use Academia Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com) (this is not suggested for the first time, similar idea", "but to keep all discussion in one place, I suggest to express your", "viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following situation. There is an [Area 51", "51 proposal [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science)) * [Use Academia Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com) (this is not suggested for the", "all discussion in one place, I suggest to express your opinions as answers", "will be closed this Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21). There are now two alternatives: * [Second start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better)", "is interesting to learn what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the", "private beta. As we have learned today, [it will be closed this Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21).", "learned today, [it will be closed this Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21). There are now two alternatives:", "It is interesting to learn what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on", "proposal [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science)) * [Use Academia Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com) (this is not suggested for the first", "an [Area 51 proposal for OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science) which recently went into the private beta.", "in one place, I suggest to express your opinions as answers to this", "two alternatives: * [Second start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better) (think what we can do better and retry", "do better and retry by starting another Area 51 proposal [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science)) * [Use", "links from this question to read further details, but to keep all discussion", "(this is not suggested for the first time, similar idea already has been", "today, [it will be closed this Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21). There are now two alternatives: *", "further details, but to keep all discussion in one place, I suggest to", "better and retry by starting another Area 51 proposal [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science)) * [Use Academia", "51 proposal for OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science) which recently went into the private beta. As we", "learn what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following situation. There", "Academia.SE community on the following situation. There is an [Area 51 proposal for", "closed this Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21). There are now two alternatives: * [Second start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better) (think what", "what we can do better and retry by starting another Area 51 proposal", "details, but to keep all discussion in one place, I suggest to express", "retry by starting another Area 51 proposal [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science)) * [Use Academia Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com) (this", "follow the links from this question to read further details, but to keep", "[here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science)) * [Use Academia Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com) (this is not suggested for the first time,", "* [Second start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better) (think what we can do better and retry by starting", "to keep all discussion in one place, I suggest to express your opinions", "which recently went into the private beta. As we have learned today, [it", "starting another Area 51 proposal [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science)) * [Use Academia Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com) (this is not", "Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com) (this is not suggested for the first time, similar idea already has", "the first time, similar idea already has been expressed [here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se)) Please follow the", "to learn what is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following situation.", "(think what we can do better and retry by starting another Area 51", "Area 51 proposal [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science)) * [Use Academia Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com) (this is not suggested for", "by starting another Area 51 proposal [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science)) * [Use Academia Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com) (this is", "on the following situation. There is an [Area 51 proposal for OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science) which", "from this question to read further details, but to keep all discussion in", "expressed [here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se)) Please follow the links from this question to read further details,", "Academia Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com) (this is not suggested for the first time, similar idea already", "[it will be closed this Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21). There are now two alternatives: * [Second", "is an [Area 51 proposal for OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science) which recently went into the private", "the private beta. As we have learned today, [it will be closed this", "following situation. There is an [Area 51 proposal for OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science) which recently went", "we have learned today, [it will be closed this Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21). There are now", "not suggested for the first time, similar idea already has been expressed [here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se))", "OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science) which recently went into the private beta. As we have learned today,", "and retry by starting another Area 51 proposal [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science)) * [Use Academia Q&A](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21605/alternative-migrate-to-academia-stackexchange-com)", "There are now two alternatives: * [Second start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better) (think what we can do", "keep all discussion in one place, I suggest to express your opinions as", "situation. There is an [Area 51 proposal for OpenScience](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65426/open-science) which recently went into", "can do better and retry by starting another Area 51 proposal [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science)) *", "suggested for the first time, similar idea already has been expressed [here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se)) Please", "place, I suggest to express your opinions as answers to this question here.", "As we have learned today, [it will be closed this Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21). There are", "Friday](http://meta.openscience.stackexchange.com/questions/69/open-science-will-be-closing-on-friday-8-21). There are now two alternatives: * [Second start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better) (think what we can", "[here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se)) Please follow the links from this question to read further details, but", "is the viewpoint of Academia.SE community on the following situation. There is an", "alternatives: * [Second start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better) (think what we can do better and retry by", "start](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/21596/the-second-start-up-what-can-we-do-better) (think what we can do better and retry by starting another Area", "idea already has been expressed [here](https://area51.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19864/open-science-is-a-duplicate-subset-of-academia-se)) Please follow the links from this question", "Please follow the links from this question to read further details, but to", "read further details, but to keep all discussion in one place, I suggest", "is not suggested for the first time, similar idea already has been expressed", "we can do better and retry by starting another Area 51 proposal [here](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90201/open-science))" ]
[ "given by users on academia.stackexchange. I know very well that some questions are", "very well that some questions are protected for saying thanks, me too !", "some questions are protected for saying thanks, me too ! etc. But does", "does it really matter if I don't say thanks ? How users on", "thanks to a very good comment or answer given by users on academia.stackexchange.", "this site (as it is the first time that I ask a question", "saying thanks, me too ! etc. But does it really matter if I", "thanks, me too ! etc. But does it really matter if I don't", "that some questions are protected for saying thanks, me too ! etc. But", "I feel guilty when I don't say thanks to a very good comment", "ask a question here.) I feel guilty when I don't say thanks to", "to this site (as it is the first time that I ask a", "the first time that I ask a question here.) I feel guilty when", "me too ! etc. But does it really matter if I don't say", "too ! etc. But does it really matter if I don't say thanks", "guilty when I don't say thanks to a very good comment or answer", "my question fits to this site (as it is the first time that", "a question here.) I feel guilty when I don't say thanks to a", "good comment or answer given by users on academia.stackexchange. I know very well", "answer given by users on academia.stackexchange. I know very well that some questions", "But does it really matter if I don't say thanks ? How users", "here.) I feel guilty when I don't say thanks to a very good", "I ask a question here.) I feel guilty when I don't say thanks", "a very good comment or answer given by users on academia.stackexchange. I know", "comment or answer given by users on academia.stackexchange. I know very well that", "I don't say thanks to a very good comment or answer given by", "(as it is the first time that I ask a question here.) I", "on academia.stackexchange. I know very well that some questions are protected for saying", "academia.stackexchange. I know very well that some questions are protected for saying thanks,", "fits to this site (as it is the first time that I ask", "site (as it is the first time that I ask a question here.)", "feel guilty when I don't say thanks to a very good comment or", "very good comment or answer given by users on academia.stackexchange. I know very", "say thanks to a very good comment or answer given by users on", "I know very well that some questions are protected for saying thanks, me", "time that I ask a question here.) I feel guilty when I don't", "etc. But does it really matter if I don't say thanks ? How", "or answer given by users on academia.stackexchange. I know very well that some", "know very well that some questions are protected for saying thanks, me too", "first time that I ask a question here.) I feel guilty when I", "it really matter if I don't say thanks ? How users on this", "are protected for saying thanks, me too ! etc. But does it really", "question here.) I feel guilty when I don't say thanks to a very", "matter if I don't say thanks ? How users on this site consider", "I don't say thanks ? How users on this site consider this issue", "to a very good comment or answer given by users on academia.stackexchange. I", "don't say thanks ? How users on this site consider this issue ?", "by users on academia.stackexchange. I know very well that some questions are protected", "is the first time that I ask a question here.) I feel guilty", "when I don't say thanks to a very good comment or answer given", "protected for saying thanks, me too ! etc. But does it really matter", "for saying thanks, me too ! etc. But does it really matter if", "Hope that my question fits to this site (as it is the first", "users on academia.stackexchange. I know very well that some questions are protected for", "really matter if I don't say thanks ? How users on this site", "! etc. But does it really matter if I don't say thanks ?", "if I don't say thanks ? How users on this site consider this", "it is the first time that I ask a question here.) I feel", "that my question fits to this site (as it is the first time", "questions are protected for saying thanks, me too ! etc. But does it", "well that some questions are protected for saying thanks, me too ! etc.", "don't say thanks to a very good comment or answer given by users", "that I ask a question here.) I feel guilty when I don't say", "question fits to this site (as it is the first time that I" ]
[ "environment more women friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly). Unfortunately, the existing how-can-we-make question received very little attention.", "make the academic environment more women friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly). Unfortunately, the existing how-can-we-make question received", "little attention. I would like to start a bounty on that question. My", "women friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly). Unfortunately, the existing how-can-we-make question received very little attention. I would", "friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly). Unfortunately, the existing how-can-we-make question received very little attention. I would like", "more effective -- set a bounty on the original question, or write a", "question received very little attention. I would like to start a bounty on", "the existing how-can-we-make question received very little attention. I would like to start", "a related existing question: [What is being done to make the academic environment", "be more effective -- set a bounty on the original question, or write", "women-friendly?\" when I noticed that the wonderful \"Questions that may already have your", "a user found fault with the question as written. **What would be more", "that the wonderful \"Questions that may already have your answer\" feature was pointing", "pointing me helpfully to a related existing question: [What is being done to", "helpfully to a related existing question: [What is being done to make the", "attention. I would like to start a bounty on that question. My only", "would be more effective -- set a bounty on the original question, or", "start a bounty on that question. My only hesitation is that a user", "being done to make the academic environment more women friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly). Unfortunately, the existing", "already have your answer\" feature was pointing me helpfully to a related existing", "received very little attention. I would like to start a bounty on that", "found fault with the question as written. **What would be more effective --", "existing how-can-we-make question received very little attention. I would like to start a", "to a related existing question: [What is being done to make the academic", "how-can-we-make question received very little attention. I would like to start a bounty", "a group or department women-friendly?\" when I noticed that the wonderful \"Questions that", "written. **What would be more effective -- set a bounty on the original", "on that question. My only hesitation is that a user found fault with", "drafting a question entitled, \"How to make a group or department women-friendly?\" when", "feature was pointing me helpfully to a related existing question: [What is being", "very little attention. I would like to start a bounty on that question.", "wonderful \"Questions that may already have your answer\" feature was pointing me helpfully", "was drafting a question entitled, \"How to make a group or department women-friendly?\"", "entitled, \"How to make a group or department women-friendly?\" when I noticed that", "noticed that the wonderful \"Questions that may already have your answer\" feature was", "make a group or department women-friendly?\" when I noticed that the wonderful \"Questions", "**What would be more effective -- set a bounty on the original question,", "as written. **What would be more effective -- set a bounty on the", "question: [What is being done to make the academic environment more women friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly).", "the question as written. **What would be more effective -- set a bounty", "the wonderful \"Questions that may already have your answer\" feature was pointing me", "me helpfully to a related existing question: [What is being done to make", "I was drafting a question entitled, \"How to make a group or department", "a question entitled, \"How to make a group or department women-friendly?\" when I", "a bounty on that question. My only hesitation is that a user found", "with the question as written. **What would be more effective -- set a", "related existing question: [What is being done to make the academic environment more", "question. My only hesitation is that a user found fault with the question", "[What is being done to make the academic environment more women friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly). Unfortunately,", "existing question: [What is being done to make the academic environment more women", "to make the academic environment more women friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly). Unfortunately, the existing how-can-we-make question", "would like to start a bounty on that question. My only hesitation is", "academic environment more women friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly). Unfortunately, the existing how-can-we-make question received very little", "Unfortunately, the existing how-can-we-make question received very little attention. I would like to", "My only hesitation is that a user found fault with the question as", "department women-friendly?\" when I noticed that the wonderful \"Questions that may already have", "user found fault with the question as written. **What would be more effective", "-- set a bounty on the original question, or write a new question?**", "bounty on that question. My only hesitation is that a user found fault", "answer\" feature was pointing me helpfully to a related existing question: [What is", "group or department women-friendly?\" when I noticed that the wonderful \"Questions that may", "to make a group or department women-friendly?\" when I noticed that the wonderful", "question entitled, \"How to make a group or department women-friendly?\" when I noticed", "\"How to make a group or department women-friendly?\" when I noticed that the", "only hesitation is that a user found fault with the question as written.", "that a user found fault with the question as written. **What would be", "have your answer\" feature was pointing me helpfully to a related existing question:", "effective -- set a bounty on the original question, or write a new", "that may already have your answer\" feature was pointing me helpfully to a", "may already have your answer\" feature was pointing me helpfully to a related", "your answer\" feature was pointing me helpfully to a related existing question: [What", "done to make the academic environment more women friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly). Unfortunately, the existing how-can-we-make", "question as written. **What would be more effective -- set a bounty on", "is that a user found fault with the question as written. **What would", "more women friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly). Unfortunately, the existing how-can-we-make question received very little attention. I", "or department women-friendly?\" when I noticed that the wonderful \"Questions that may already", "is being done to make the academic environment more women friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly). Unfortunately, the", "the academic environment more women friendly?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-enviroment-more-women-friendly). Unfortunately, the existing how-can-we-make question received very", "fault with the question as written. **What would be more effective -- set", "I noticed that the wonderful \"Questions that may already have your answer\" feature", "like to start a bounty on that question. My only hesitation is that", "hesitation is that a user found fault with the question as written. **What", "was pointing me helpfully to a related existing question: [What is being done", "\"Questions that may already have your answer\" feature was pointing me helpfully to", "to start a bounty on that question. My only hesitation is that a", "that question. My only hesitation is that a user found fault with the", "when I noticed that the wonderful \"Questions that may already have your answer\"", "I would like to start a bounty on that question. My only hesitation" ]
[ "And for the last 2-3: could you write them (I don't have access", "sanity for a short time... and then only realize that it has been", "my sanity for a short time... and then only realize that it has", "for a short time... and then only realize that it has been removed", "at random. And for the last 2-3: could you write them (I don't", "being posted). For me it is very frustrating - I feel chaotic in", "post, question my sanity for a short time... and then only realize that", "high value. I only claim that I don't want to participate in a", "not fully understand. Please, if you have to remove my comment, DO inform", "value. I only claim that I don't want to participate in a place", "don't want to participate in a place where my things disappear at random.", "claim that I don't want to participate in a place where my things", "last 2-3: could you write them (I don't have access to them) and", "that I don't want to participate in a place where my things disappear", "things a few times, double check if I posted a comment on the", "participate in a place where my things disappear at random. And for the", "them) and present some rationale? (Hopefully the benefit for the community is bigger", "my comments have high value. I only claim that I don't want to", "a comment on the right post, question my sanity for a short time...", "some rationale? (Hopefully the benefit for the community is bigger than the cost", "access to them) and present some rationale? (Hopefully the benefit for the community", "posted). For me it is very frustrating - I feel chaotic in an", "don't have access to them) and present some rationale? (Hopefully the benefit for", "in a place where my things disappear at random. And for the last", "get deleted (sometimes right after being posted). For me it is very frustrating", "comment on the right post, question my sanity for a short time... and", "want to participate in a place where my things disappear at random. And", "time my comments get deleted (sometimes right after being posted). For me it", "the community is bigger than the cost of frustrating a user (i.e. me),", "posted a comment on the right post, question my sanity for a short", "From time to time my comments get deleted (sometimes right after being posted).", "to them) and present some rationale? (Hopefully the benefit for the community is", "only claim that I don't want to participate in a place where my", "without a notice. I refresh things a few times, double check if I", "I don't claim that all of my comments have high value. I only", "I refresh things a few times, double check if I posted a comment", "the last 2-3: could you write them (I don't have access to them)", "don't claim that all of my comments have high value. I only claim", "removed for a reason I do not fully understand. Please, if you have", "2-3: could you write them (I don't have access to them) and present", "right post, question my sanity for a short time... and then only realize", "of my comments have high value. I only claim that I don't want", "comment, DO inform me. I don't claim that all of my comments have", "for the community is bigger than the cost of frustrating a user (i.e.", "if I posted a comment on the right post, question my sanity for", "it is very frustrating - I feel chaotic in an environment in which", "have access to them) and present some rationale? (Hopefully the benefit for the", "has been removed for a reason I do not fully understand. Please, if", "where my things disappear at random. And for the last 2-3: could you", "than the cost of frustrating a user (i.e. me), and potentially discouraging him", "all of my comments have high value. I only claim that I don't", "if you have to remove my comment, DO inform me. I don't claim", "for a reason I do not fully understand. Please, if you have to", "double check if I posted a comment on the right post, question my", "remove my comment, DO inform me. I don't claim that all of my", "I don't want to participate in a place where my things disappear at", "comments have high value. I only claim that I don't want to participate", "me it is very frustrating - I feel chaotic in an environment in", "place where my things disappear at random. And for the last 2-3: could", "I feel chaotic in an environment in which my things change without a", "is bigger than the cost of frustrating a user (i.e. me), and potentially", "short time... and then only realize that it has been removed for a", "refresh things a few times, double check if I posted a comment on", "me. I don't claim that all of my comments have high value. I", "feel chaotic in an environment in which my things change without a notice.", "for the last 2-3: could you write them (I don't have access to", "and present some rationale? (Hopefully the benefit for the community is bigger than", "frustrating - I feel chaotic in an environment in which my things change", "random. And for the last 2-3: could you write them (I don't have", "my comment, DO inform me. I don't claim that all of my comments", "my things disappear at random. And for the last 2-3: could you write", "I posted a comment on the right post, question my sanity for a", "to remove my comment, DO inform me. I don't claim that all of", "on the right post, question my sanity for a short time... and then", "right after being posted). For me it is very frustrating - I feel", "that it has been removed for a reason I do not fully understand.", "notice. I refresh things a few times, double check if I posted a", "have high value. I only claim that I don't want to participate in", "to participate in a place where my things disappear at random. And for", "things change without a notice. I refresh things a few times, double check", "could you write them (I don't have access to them) and present some", "write them (I don't have access to them) and present some rationale? (Hopefully", "after being posted). For me it is very frustrating - I feel chaotic", "community is bigger than the cost of frustrating a user (i.e. me), and", "times, double check if I posted a comment on the right post, question", "claim that all of my comments have high value. I only claim that", "a notice. I refresh things a few times, double check if I posted", "comments get deleted (sometimes right after being posted). For me it is very", "deleted (sometimes right after being posted). For me it is very frustrating -", "DO inform me. I don't claim that all of my comments have high", "disappear at random. And for the last 2-3: could you write them (I", "I do not fully understand. Please, if you have to remove my comment,", "realize that it has been removed for a reason I do not fully", "my comments get deleted (sometimes right after being posted). For me it is", "the right post, question my sanity for a short time... and then only", "my things change without a notice. I refresh things a few times, double", "in which my things change without a notice. I refresh things a few", "to time my comments get deleted (sometimes right after being posted). For me", "been removed for a reason I do not fully understand. Please, if you", "bigger than the cost of frustrating a user (i.e. me), and potentially discouraging", "them (I don't have access to them) and present some rationale? (Hopefully the", "things disappear at random. And for the last 2-3: could you write them", "you write them (I don't have access to them) and present some rationale?", "understand. Please, if you have to remove my comment, DO inform me. I", "reason I do not fully understand. Please, if you have to remove my", "(I don't have access to them) and present some rationale? (Hopefully the benefit", "For me it is very frustrating - I feel chaotic in an environment", "question my sanity for a short time... and then only realize that it", "in an environment in which my things change without a notice. I refresh", "you have to remove my comment, DO inform me. I don't claim that", "that all of my comments have high value. I only claim that I", "(Hopefully the benefit for the community is bigger than the cost of frustrating", "an environment in which my things change without a notice. I refresh things", "benefit for the community is bigger than the cost of frustrating a user", "few times, double check if I posted a comment on the right post,", "Please, if you have to remove my comment, DO inform me. I don't", "I only claim that I don't want to participate in a place where", "rationale? (Hopefully the benefit for the community is bigger than the cost of", "cost of frustrating a user (i.e. me), and potentially discouraging him for good.)", "very frustrating - I feel chaotic in an environment in which my things", "the cost of frustrating a user (i.e. me), and potentially discouraging him for", "time... and then only realize that it has been removed for a reason", "inform me. I don't claim that all of my comments have high value.", "the benefit for the community is bigger than the cost of frustrating a", "a place where my things disappear at random. And for the last 2-3:", "it has been removed for a reason I do not fully understand. Please,", "which my things change without a notice. I refresh things a few times,", "a reason I do not fully understand. Please, if you have to remove", "chaotic in an environment in which my things change without a notice. I", "and then only realize that it has been removed for a reason I", "environment in which my things change without a notice. I refresh things a", "then only realize that it has been removed for a reason I do", "a few times, double check if I posted a comment on the right", "- I feel chaotic in an environment in which my things change without", "check if I posted a comment on the right post, question my sanity", "is very frustrating - I feel chaotic in an environment in which my", "change without a notice. I refresh things a few times, double check if", "do not fully understand. Please, if you have to remove my comment, DO", "present some rationale? (Hopefully the benefit for the community is bigger than the", "time to time my comments get deleted (sometimes right after being posted). For", "only realize that it has been removed for a reason I do not", "fully understand. Please, if you have to remove my comment, DO inform me.", "a short time... and then only realize that it has been removed for", "have to remove my comment, DO inform me. I don't claim that all", "(sometimes right after being posted). For me it is very frustrating - I" ]
[ "a suggestion that was incorporated into the question. * How is this question", "non-opinion information (admittedly not my answer, which is somewhat more opinion based). The", "a daily basis, such as the \"I have no idea how to interact", "dispute the lock please feel free to discuss on Academia Meta. – eykanal♦", "to show that the community thought this question was worth looking at -", "incorporated into the question. * How is this question distinct enough from [this", "show that the community thought this question was worth looking at - it's", "rather than a unilateral moderator decision? I'll say for my part I found", "thought this question was worth looking at - it's well above the mean", "is just \"this isn't considered a good, on topic question\". That isn't really", "a vote to close rather than a unilateral moderator decision? I'll say for", "provide solid, non-opinion information (admittedly not my answer, which is somewhat more opinion", "the thread is good, it does seem to show that the community thought", "of itself evidence that the thread is good, it does seem to show", "it's well above the mean and median number of votes for questions on", "the very least, even if it wasn't left open, shouldn't this have been", "above the lock notice, or the comments. Because the lock notice is just", "fairly vauge in terms of actually figuring out a reason - the largest", "eykanal♦ > > > In reference to [this thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163). A couple questions regarding", "the lock please feel free to discuss on Academia Meta. – eykanal♦ >", "out a reason - the largest one, for example, is a suggestion that", "for example, is a suggestion that was incorporated into the question. * How", "even if it wasn't left open, shouldn't this have been posed as a", "reference to [this thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163). A couple questions regarding this lock: * \"For the", "of other types of questions we get and answer on a daily basis,", "enough from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1) which have been protected, rather than", "please feel free to discuss on Academia Meta. – eykanal♦ > > >", "number of other types of questions we get and answer on a daily", "decision? I'll say for my part I found this question to be much", "if it wasn't left open, shouldn't this have been posed as a vote", "daily basis, such as the \"I have no idea how to interact with", "into the question. * How is this question distinct enough from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559)", "than locked? * There are answers that provide solid, non-opinion information (admittedly not", "found this question to be much more interesting and potentially useful to the", "got 19 upvotes, 4 favorites, and a substantial number of upvoted answers. While", "feel free to discuss on Academia Meta. – eykanal♦ > > > In", "Meta. – eykanal♦ > > > In reference to [this thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163). A couple", "this question distinct enough from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1) which have been", "posed as a vote to close rather than a unilateral moderator decision? I'll", "or the comments. Because the lock notice is just \"this isn't considered a", "\"For the reasons above\" - is above the lock notice, or the comments.", "\"this isn't considered a good, on topic question\". That isn't really a *reason*.", "and of itself evidence that the thread is good, it does seem to", "part I found this question to be much more interesting and potentially useful", "be much more interesting and potentially useful to the community than a number", "on topic question\". That isn't really a *reason*. And the comments are fairly", "protected, rather than locked? * There are answers that provide solid, non-opinion information", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1) which have been protected, rather than locked? * There", "isn't really a *reason*. And the comments are fairly vauge in terms of", "upvotes, 4 favorites, and a substantial number of upvoted answers. While I understand", "was worth looking at - it's well above the mean and median number", "one, for example, is a suggestion that was incorporated into the question. *", "community thought this question was worth looking at - it's well above the", "> For the reasons above, I have locked this question. If anyone wishes", "are answers that provide solid, non-opinion information (admittedly not my answer, which is", "19 upvotes, 4 favorites, and a substantial number of upvoted answers. While I", "I found this question to be much more interesting and potentially useful to", "– eykanal♦ > > > In reference to [this thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163). A couple questions", "evidence that the thread is good, it does seem to show that the", "> > > In reference to [this thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163). A couple questions regarding this", "question. If anyone wishes to dispute the lock please feel free to discuss", "worth looking at - it's well above the mean and median number of", "it does seem to show that the community thought this question was worth", "And the comments are fairly vauge in terms of actually figuring out a", "shouldn't this have been posed as a vote to close rather than a", "other types of questions we get and answer on a daily basis, such", "* How is this question distinct enough from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1)", "not my answer, which is somewhat more opinion based). The question got 19", "good, it does seem to show that the community thought this question was", "regarding this lock: * \"For the reasons above\" - is above the lock", "a substantial number of upvoted answers. While I understand that's not in and", "- the largest one, for example, is a suggestion that was incorporated into", "above, I have locked this question. If anyone wishes to dispute the lock", "question was worth looking at - it's well above the mean and median", "answer on a daily basis, such as the \"I have no idea how", "\"I have no idea how to interact with my supervisor in this surreal", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1) which have been protected, rather than locked? *", "opinion based). The question got 19 upvotes, 4 favorites, and a substantial number", "one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1) which have been protected, rather than locked? * There are answers that", "interesting and potentially useful to the community than a number of other types", "While I understand that's not in and of itself evidence that the thread", "to close rather than a unilateral moderator decision? I'll say for my part", "are fairly vauge in terms of actually figuring out a reason - the", "from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1) which have been protected, rather than locked?", "as the \"I have no idea how to interact with my supervisor in", "is good, it does seem to show that the community thought this question", "vote to close rather than a unilateral moderator decision? I'll say for my", "have locked this question. If anyone wishes to dispute the lock please feel", "*reason*. And the comments are fairly vauge in terms of actually figuring out", "the mean and median number of votes for questions on the front page,", "on a daily basis, such as the \"I have no idea how to", "such as the \"I have no idea how to interact with my supervisor", "question distinct enough from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1) which have been protected,", "The question got 19 upvotes, 4 favorites, and a substantial number of upvoted", "free to discuss on Academia Meta. – eykanal♦ > > > In reference", "I'll say for my part I found this question to be much more", "we get and answer on a daily basis, such as the \"I have", "[this thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163). A couple questions regarding this lock: * \"For the reasons above\"", "is somewhat more opinion based). The question got 19 upvotes, 4 favorites, and", "itself evidence that the thread is good, it does seem to show that", "votes for questions on the front page, etc. At the very least, even", "good, on topic question\". That isn't really a *reason*. And the comments are", "actually figuring out a reason - the largest one, for example, is a", "it wasn't left open, shouldn't this have been posed as a vote to", "moderator decision? I'll say for my part I found this question to be", "types of questions we get and answer on a daily basis, such as", "of questions we get and answer on a daily basis, such as the", "upvoted answers. While I understand that's not in and of itself evidence that", "How is this question distinct enough from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1) which", "the largest one, for example, is a suggestion that was incorporated into the", "a number of other types of questions we get and answer on a", "is a suggestion that was incorporated into the question. * How is this", "useful to the community than a number of other types of questions we", "is this question distinct enough from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1) which have", "terms of actually figuring out a reason - the largest one, for example,", "for questions on the front page, etc. At the very least, even if", "the comments. Because the lock notice is just \"this isn't considered a good,", "the front page, etc. At the very least, even if it wasn't left", "much more interesting and potentially useful to the community than a number of", "reasons above, I have locked this question. If anyone wishes to dispute the", "as a vote to close rather than a unilateral moderator decision? I'll say", "answers. While I understand that's not in and of itself evidence that the", "the lock notice is just \"this isn't considered a good, on topic question\".", "close rather than a unilateral moderator decision? I'll say for my part I", "basis, such as the \"I have no idea how to interact with my", "reasons above\" - is above the lock notice, or the comments. Because the", "couple questions regarding this lock: * \"For the reasons above\" - is above", "isn't considered a good, on topic question\". That isn't really a *reason*. And", "lock please feel free to discuss on Academia Meta. – eykanal♦ > >", "the community thought this question was worth looking at - it's well above", "say for my part I found this question to be much more interesting", "have no idea how to interact with my supervisor in this surreal edge", "> > For the reasons above, I have locked this question. If anyone", "the question. * How is this question distinct enough from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559) or", "well above the mean and median number of votes for questions on the", "very least, even if it wasn't left open, shouldn't this have been posed", "and potentially useful to the community than a number of other types of", "figuring out a reason - the largest one, for example, is a suggestion", "have been protected, rather than locked? * There are answers that provide solid,", "above the mean and median number of votes for questions on the front", "reason - the largest one, for example, is a suggestion that was incorporated", "was incorporated into the question. * How is this question distinct enough from", "a unilateral moderator decision? I'll say for my part I found this question", "to be much more interesting and potentially useful to the community than a", "front page, etc. At the very least, even if it wasn't left open,", "rather than locked? * There are answers that provide solid, non-opinion information (admittedly", "For the reasons above, I have locked this question. If anyone wishes to", "question to be much more interesting and potentially useful to the community than", "notice, or the comments. Because the lock notice is just \"this isn't considered", "on Academia Meta. – eykanal♦ > > > In reference to [this thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163).", "* There are answers that provide solid, non-opinion information (admittedly not my answer,", "more opinion based). The question got 19 upvotes, 4 favorites, and a substantial", "comments are fairly vauge in terms of actually figuring out a reason -", "of actually figuring out a reason - the largest one, for example, is", "this question. If anyone wishes to dispute the lock please feel free to", "somewhat more opinion based). The question got 19 upvotes, 4 favorites, and a", "mean and median number of votes for questions on the front page, etc.", "(admittedly not my answer, which is somewhat more opinion based). The question got", "my answer, which is somewhat more opinion based). The question got 19 upvotes,", "thread is good, it does seem to show that the community thought this", "to [this thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163). A couple questions regarding this lock: * \"For the reasons", "questions on the front page, etc. At the very least, even if it", "this lock: * \"For the reasons above\" - is above the lock notice,", "That isn't really a *reason*. And the comments are fairly vauge in terms", "lock: * \"For the reasons above\" - is above the lock notice, or", "favorites, and a substantial number of upvoted answers. While I understand that's not", "distinct enough from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559) or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1) which have been protected, rather", "4 favorites, and a substantial number of upvoted answers. While I understand that's", "I understand that's not in and of itself evidence that the thread is", "understand that's not in and of itself evidence that the thread is good,", "that the thread is good, it does seem to show that the community", "or [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1) which have been protected, rather than locked? * There are", "more interesting and potentially useful to the community than a number of other", "page, etc. At the very least, even if it wasn't left open, shouldn't", "not in and of itself evidence that the thread is good, it does", "to the community than a number of other types of questions we get", "a *reason*. And the comments are fairly vauge in terms of actually figuring", "questions we get and answer on a daily basis, such as the \"I", "seem to show that the community thought this question was worth looking at", "of votes for questions on the front page, etc. At the very least,", "been posed as a vote to close rather than a unilateral moderator decision?", "community than a number of other types of questions we get and answer", "vauge in terms of actually figuring out a reason - the largest one,", "is above the lock notice, or the comments. Because the lock notice is", "locked? * There are answers that provide solid, non-opinion information (admittedly not my", "this question to be much more interesting and potentially useful to the community", "have been posed as a vote to close rather than a unilateral moderator", "the \"I have no idea how to interact with my supervisor in this", "the comments are fairly vauge in terms of actually figuring out a reason", "really a *reason*. And the comments are fairly vauge in terms of actually", "of upvoted answers. While I understand that's not in and of itself evidence", "largest one, for example, is a suggestion that was incorporated into the question.", "substantial number of upvoted answers. While I understand that's not in and of", "considered a good, on topic question\". That isn't really a *reason*. And the", "locked this question. If anyone wishes to dispute the lock please feel free", "get and answer on a daily basis, such as the \"I have no", "median number of votes for questions on the front page, etc. At the", "answers that provide solid, non-opinion information (admittedly not my answer, which is somewhat", "discuss on Academia Meta. – eykanal♦ > > > In reference to [this", "looking at - it's well above the mean and median number of votes", "does seem to show that the community thought this question was worth looking", "than a unilateral moderator decision? I'll say for my part I found this", "been protected, rather than locked? * There are answers that provide solid, non-opinion", "left open, shouldn't this have been posed as a vote to close rather", "that provide solid, non-opinion information (admittedly not my answer, which is somewhat more", "I have locked this question. If anyone wishes to dispute the lock please", "thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163). A couple questions regarding this lock: * \"For the reasons above\" -", "lock notice, or the comments. Because the lock notice is just \"this isn't", "for my part I found this question to be much more interesting and", "on the front page, etc. At the very least, even if it wasn't", "the reasons above, I have locked this question. If anyone wishes to dispute", "my part I found this question to be much more interesting and potentially", "the community than a number of other types of questions we get and", "at - it's well above the mean and median number of votes for", "the reasons above\" - is above the lock notice, or the comments. Because", "- it's well above the mean and median number of votes for questions", "At the very least, even if it wasn't left open, shouldn't this have", "information (admittedly not my answer, which is somewhat more opinion based). The question", "this have been posed as a vote to close rather than a unilateral", "If anyone wishes to dispute the lock please feel free to discuss on", "A couple questions regarding this lock: * \"For the reasons above\" - is", "question. * How is this question distinct enough from [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16545/what-can-academics-and-students-do-to-reduce-racism-in-academia/16559#16559) or [this", "which have been protected, rather than locked? * There are answers that provide", "unilateral moderator decision? I'll say for my part I found this question to", "number of upvoted answers. While I understand that's not in and of itself", "Academia Meta. – eykanal♦ > > > In reference to [this thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163). A", "question\". That isn't really a *reason*. And the comments are fairly vauge in", "open, shouldn't this have been posed as a vote to close rather than", "to dispute the lock please feel free to discuss on Academia Meta. –", "There are answers that provide solid, non-opinion information (admittedly not my answer, which", "in terms of actually figuring out a reason - the largest one, for", "and median number of votes for questions on the front page, etc. At", "comments. Because the lock notice is just \"this isn't considered a good, on", "wasn't left open, shouldn't this have been posed as a vote to close", "[this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/29018/how-to-remove-gender-bias-from-an-academic-job-search?rq=1) which have been protected, rather than locked? * There are answers", "potentially useful to the community than a number of other types of questions", "the lock notice, or the comments. Because the lock notice is just \"this", "above\" - is above the lock notice, or the comments. Because the lock", "questions regarding this lock: * \"For the reasons above\" - is above the", "lock notice is just \"this isn't considered a good, on topic question\". That", "a reason - the largest one, for example, is a suggestion that was", "that was incorporated into the question. * How is this question distinct enough", "number of votes for questions on the front page, etc. At the very", "no idea how to interact with my supervisor in this surreal edge case...\"", "anyone wishes to dispute the lock please feel free to discuss on Academia", "> > In reference to [this thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163). A couple questions regarding this lock:", "based). The question got 19 upvotes, 4 favorites, and a substantial number of", "that the community thought this question was worth looking at - it's well", "to discuss on Academia Meta. – eykanal♦ > > > In reference to", "- is above the lock notice, or the comments. Because the lock notice", "than a number of other types of questions we get and answer on", "In reference to [this thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163). A couple questions regarding this lock: * \"For", "that's not in and of itself evidence that the thread is good, it", "and answer on a daily basis, such as the \"I have no idea", "suggestion that was incorporated into the question. * How is this question distinct", "in and of itself evidence that the thread is good, it does seem", "wishes to dispute the lock please feel free to discuss on Academia Meta.", "* \"For the reasons above\" - is above the lock notice, or the", "and a substantial number of upvoted answers. While I understand that's not in", "which is somewhat more opinion based). The question got 19 upvotes, 4 favorites,", "solid, non-opinion information (admittedly not my answer, which is somewhat more opinion based).", "least, even if it wasn't left open, shouldn't this have been posed as", "this question was worth looking at - it's well above the mean and", "answer, which is somewhat more opinion based). The question got 19 upvotes, 4", "> In reference to [this thread](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2113/how-can-we-make-the-academic-environment-more-women-friendly/54163#54163). A couple questions regarding this lock: *", "etc. At the very least, even if it wasn't left open, shouldn't this", "notice is just \"this isn't considered a good, on topic question\". That isn't", "question got 19 upvotes, 4 favorites, and a substantial number of upvoted answers.", "just \"this isn't considered a good, on topic question\". That isn't really a", "Because the lock notice is just \"this isn't considered a good, on topic", "a good, on topic question\". That isn't really a *reason*. And the comments", "example, is a suggestion that was incorporated into the question. * How is", "topic question\". That isn't really a *reason*. And the comments are fairly vauge" ]
[ "Academia would be interested in permanently archiving and assigning Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs)", "The Winnower. We’ve begun to offer DOIs and permanent archival to blogs, scholarly", "In short we’d love to make these great Q&As citable in the scholarly", "and how we’re doing it. **What is a DOI?** <http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html> **Why we assign", "feedback before we do anything. We’ve met with some great people at the", "and see if users of Stack Exchange Academia would be interested in permanently", "see if users of Stack Exchange Academia would be interested in permanently archiving", "interested in permanently archiving and assigning Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) to top threads", "Academia should be assigned a DOI and archived permanently via The Winnower? If", "media and how we’re doing it. **What is a DOI?** <http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html> **Why we", "if users of Stack Exchange Academia would be interested in permanently archiving and", "how we’re doing it. **What is a DOI?** <http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html> **Why we assign DOIs", "(thewinnower.com) here. I wanted to reach out and see if users of Stack", "DOI?** <http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html> **Why we assign DOIs and archive scholarly reddit AMAs** <https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/> And", "and permanent archival to blogs, scholarly reddit AMAs, and we think various Stack", "here is some more info on why we are offering DOIs to new", "such services, services that are typically only afforded to traditional scholarly publishers. In", "afforded to traditional scholarly publishers. In short we’d love to make these great", "on users CVs for credit in the workplace/academia. But of course, we’d like", "is a DOI?** <http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html> **Why we assign DOIs and archive scholarly reddit AMAs**", "via Portico, the same method used for many leading scholarly journals. Thanks! Jusg,", "you set If not, why? For background here is some more info on", "the Stack Exchange offices and based upon your feedback they are willing to", "For background here is some more info on why we are offering DOIs", "We’ve met with some great people at the Stack Exchange offices and based", "are typically only afforded to traditional scholarly publishers. In short we’d love to", "here. I wanted to reach out and see if users of Stack Exchange", "DOI and archived permanently via The Winnower? If so, what threshold would you", "to make these great Q&As citable in the scholarly literature and count on", "would be interested in permanently archiving and assigning Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) to", "to reach out and see if users of Stack Exchange Academia would be", "deserving of such services, services that are typically only afforded to traditional scholarly", "we are offering DOIs to new media and how we’re doing it. **What", "assigning Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) to top threads with The Winnower. We’ve begun", "services, services that are typically only afforded to traditional scholarly publishers. In short", "and we think various Stack Exchange is equally deserving of such services, services", "short we’d love to make these great Q&As citable in the scholarly literature", "some great people at the Stack Exchange offices and based upon your feedback", "love to make these great Q&As citable in the scholarly literature and count", "credit in the workplace/academia. But of course, we’d like your feedback before we", "those curious we archive content via Portico, the same method used for many", "upon your feedback they are willing to help. So… Do you think top", "services that are typically only afforded to traditional scholarly publishers. In short we’d", "Winnower. We’ve begun to offer DOIs and permanent archival to blogs, scholarly reddit", "a DOI and archived permanently via The Winnower? If so, what threshold would", "we assign DOIs and archive scholarly reddit AMAs** <https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/> And for those curious", "DOIs and archive scholarly reddit AMAs** <https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/> And for those curious we archive", "typically only afforded to traditional scholarly publishers. In short we’d love to make", "archive scholarly reddit AMAs** <https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/> And for those curious we archive content via", "great people at the Stack Exchange offices and based upon your feedback they", "Do you think top threads in Academia should be assigned a DOI and", "more info on why we are offering DOIs to new media and how", "think top threads in Academia should be assigned a DOI and archived permanently", "on why we are offering DOIs to new media and how we’re doing", "archival to blogs, scholarly reddit AMAs, and we think various Stack Exchange is", "The Winnower? If so, what threshold would you set If not, why? For", "in Academia should be assigned a DOI and archived permanently via The Winnower?", "reddit AMAs** <https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/> And for those curious we archive content via Portico, the", "to new media and how we’re doing it. **What is a DOI?** <http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html>", "based upon your feedback they are willing to help. So… Do you think", "DOIs and permanent archival to blogs, scholarly reddit AMAs, and we think various", "**Why we assign DOIs and archive scholarly reddit AMAs** <https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/> And for those", "archive content via Portico, the same method used for many leading scholarly journals.", "Winnower? If so, what threshold would you set If not, why? For background", "users CVs for credit in the workplace/academia. But of course, we’d like your", "and archived permanently via The Winnower? If so, what threshold would you set", "same method used for many leading scholarly journals. Thanks! Jusg, founder of The", "anything. We’ve met with some great people at the Stack Exchange offices and", "for credit in the workplace/academia. But of course, we’d like your feedback before", "Winnower (thewinnower.com) here. I wanted to reach out and see if users of", "help. So… Do you think top threads in Academia should be assigned a", "threshold would you set If not, why? For background here is some more", "If so, what threshold would you set If not, why? For background here", "Stack Exchange Academia would be interested in permanently archiving and assigning Digital Object", "that are typically only afforded to traditional scholarly publishers. In short we’d love", "top threads in Academia should be assigned a DOI and archived permanently via", "So… Do you think top threads in Academia should be assigned a DOI", "we’d love to make these great Q&As citable in the scholarly literature and", "If not, why? For background here is some more info on why we", "offering DOIs to new media and how we’re doing it. **What is a", "<https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/> And for those curious we archive content via Portico, the same method", "wanted to reach out and see if users of Stack Exchange Academia would", "feedback they are willing to help. So… Do you think top threads in", "permanently archiving and assigning Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) to top threads with The", "course, we’d like your feedback before we do anything. We’ve met with some", "should be assigned a DOI and archived permanently via The Winnower? If so,", "content via Portico, the same method used for many leading scholarly journals. Thanks!", "I wanted to reach out and see if users of Stack Exchange Academia", "a DOI?** <http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html> **Why we assign DOIs and archive scholarly reddit AMAs** <https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/>", "before we do anything. We’ve met with some great people at the Stack", "of such services, services that are typically only afforded to traditional scholarly publishers.", "AMAs** <https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/> And for those curious we archive content via Portico, the same", "CVs for credit in the workplace/academia. But of course, we’d like your feedback", "is some more info on why we are offering DOIs to new media", "why we are offering DOIs to new media and how we’re doing it.", "assign DOIs and archive scholarly reddit AMAs** <https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/> And for those curious we", "Portico, the same method used for many leading scholarly journals. Thanks! Jusg, founder", "method used for many leading scholarly journals. Thanks! Jusg, founder of The Winnower", "in permanently archiving and assigning Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) to top threads with", "with some great people at the Stack Exchange offices and based upon your", "publishers. In short we’d love to make these great Q&As citable in the", "Exchange offices and based upon your feedback they are willing to help. So…", "archived permanently via The Winnower? If so, what threshold would you set If", "and archive scholarly reddit AMAs** <https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/> And for those curious we archive content", "met with some great people at the Stack Exchange offices and based upon", "people at the Stack Exchange offices and based upon your feedback they are", "to help. So… Do you think top threads in Academia should be assigned", "doing it. **What is a DOI?** <http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html> **Why we assign DOIs and archive", "only afforded to traditional scholarly publishers. In short we’d love to make these", "archiving and assigning Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) to top threads with The Winnower.", "Object Identifiers (DOIs) to top threads with The Winnower. We’ve begun to offer", "not, why? For background here is some more info on why we are", "scholarly reddit AMAs, and we think various Stack Exchange is equally deserving of", "your feedback before we do anything. We’ve met with some great people at", "the workplace/academia. But of course, we’d like your feedback before we do anything.", "And for those curious we archive content via Portico, the same method used", "to blogs, scholarly reddit AMAs, and we think various Stack Exchange is equally", "some more info on why we are offering DOIs to new media and", "great Q&As citable in the scholarly literature and count on users CVs for", "begun to offer DOIs and permanent archival to blogs, scholarly reddit AMAs, and", "various Stack Exchange is equally deserving of such services, services that are typically", "and count on users CVs for credit in the workplace/academia. But of course,", "info on why we are offering DOIs to new media and how we’re", "set If not, why? For background here is some more info on why", "**What is a DOI?** <http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html> **Why we assign DOIs and archive scholarly reddit", "it. **What is a DOI?** <http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html> **Why we assign DOIs and archive scholarly", "make these great Q&As citable in the scholarly literature and count on users", "citable in the scholarly literature and count on users CVs for credit in", "we do anything. We’ve met with some great people at the Stack Exchange", "blogs, scholarly reddit AMAs, and we think various Stack Exchange is equally deserving", "of course, we’d like your feedback before we do anything. We’ve met with", "threads with The Winnower. We’ve begun to offer DOIs and permanent archival to", "count on users CVs for credit in the workplace/academia. But of course, we’d", "be assigned a DOI and archived permanently via The Winnower? If so, what", "are offering DOIs to new media and how we’re doing it. **What is", "out and see if users of Stack Exchange Academia would be interested in", "of Stack Exchange Academia would be interested in permanently archiving and assigning Digital", "(DOIs) to top threads with The Winnower. We’ve begun to offer DOIs and", "and based upon your feedback they are willing to help. So… Do you", "We’ve begun to offer DOIs and permanent archival to blogs, scholarly reddit AMAs,", "the scholarly literature and count on users CVs for credit in the workplace/academia.", "Stack Exchange is equally deserving of such services, services that are typically only", "Stack Exchange offices and based upon your feedback they are willing to help.", "they are willing to help. So… Do you think top threads in Academia", "at the Stack Exchange offices and based upon your feedback they are willing", "reddit AMAs, and we think various Stack Exchange is equally deserving of such", "think various Stack Exchange is equally deserving of such services, services that are", "do anything. We’ve met with some great people at the Stack Exchange offices", "users of Stack Exchange Academia would be interested in permanently archiving and assigning", "would you set If not, why? For background here is some more info", "from The Winnower (thewinnower.com) here. I wanted to reach out and see if", "literature and count on users CVs for credit in the workplace/academia. But of", "are willing to help. So… Do you think top threads in Academia should", "offices and based upon your feedback they are willing to help. So… Do", "<http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html> **Why we assign DOIs and archive scholarly reddit AMAs** <https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/> And for", "your feedback they are willing to help. So… Do you think top threads", "be interested in permanently archiving and assigning Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) to top", "traditional scholarly publishers. In short we’d love to make these great Q&As citable", "workplace/academia. But of course, we’d like your feedback before we do anything. We’ve", "like your feedback before we do anything. We’ve met with some great people", "to top threads with The Winnower. We’ve begun to offer DOIs and permanent", "for those curious we archive content via Portico, the same method used for", "DOIs to new media and how we’re doing it. **What is a DOI?**", "curious we archive content via Portico, the same method used for many leading", "Identifiers (DOIs) to top threads with The Winnower. We’ve begun to offer DOIs", "we’d like your feedback before we do anything. We’ve met with some great", "Exchange is equally deserving of such services, services that are typically only afforded", "AMAs, and we think various Stack Exchange is equally deserving of such services,", "scholarly publishers. In short we’d love to make these great Q&As citable in", "Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) to top threads with The Winnower. We’ve begun to", "scholarly literature and count on users CVs for credit in the workplace/academia. But", "Jusg from The Winnower (thewinnower.com) here. I wanted to reach out and see", "in the scholarly literature and count on users CVs for credit in the", "you think top threads in Academia should be assigned a DOI and archived", "threads in Academia should be assigned a DOI and archived permanently via The", "what threshold would you set If not, why? For background here is some", "we archive content via Portico, the same method used for many leading scholarly", "to offer DOIs and permanent archival to blogs, scholarly reddit AMAs, and we", "top threads with The Winnower. We’ve begun to offer DOIs and permanent archival", "assigned a DOI and archived permanently via The Winnower? If so, what threshold", "with The Winnower. We’ve begun to offer DOIs and permanent archival to blogs,", "is equally deserving of such services, services that are typically only afforded to", "The Winnower (thewinnower.com) here. I wanted to reach out and see if users", "background here is some more info on why we are offering DOIs to", "offer DOIs and permanent archival to blogs, scholarly reddit AMAs, and we think", "via The Winnower? If so, what threshold would you set If not, why?", "so, what threshold would you set If not, why? For background here is", "new media and how we’re doing it. **What is a DOI?** <http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html> **Why", "equally deserving of such services, services that are typically only afforded to traditional", "these great Q&As citable in the scholarly literature and count on users CVs", "Q&As citable in the scholarly literature and count on users CVs for credit", "willing to help. So… Do you think top threads in Academia should be", "Exchange Academia would be interested in permanently archiving and assigning Digital Object Identifiers", "we think various Stack Exchange is equally deserving of such services, services that", "But of course, we’d like your feedback before we do anything. We’ve met", "and assigning Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) to top threads with The Winnower. We’ve", "reach out and see if users of Stack Exchange Academia would be interested", "why? For background here is some more info on why we are offering", "scholarly reddit AMAs** <https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3finu8/doi_assignments_for_science_amas/> And for those curious we archive content via Portico,", "to traditional scholarly publishers. In short we’d love to make these great Q&As", "the same method used for many leading scholarly journals. Thanks! Jusg, founder of", "permanently via The Winnower? If so, what threshold would you set If not,", "used for many leading scholarly journals. Thanks! Jusg, founder of The Winnower (josh@thewinnower.com)", "we’re doing it. **What is a DOI?** <http://www.crossref.org/01company/16fastfacts.html> **Why we assign DOIs and", "in the workplace/academia. But of course, we’d like your feedback before we do", "permanent archival to blogs, scholarly reddit AMAs, and we think various Stack Exchange" ]
[ "exact SE site when flagging off-topic questions. Or am I missing something? Is", "nicer to suggest the exact SE site when flagging off-topic questions. Or am", "site when flagging off-topic questions. Or am I missing something? Is such an", "something? Is such an option available in addition to notifying it in the", "sites are in the option when flagging a question as off topic. It", "Or am I missing something? Is such an option available in addition to", "question as off topic. It would be nicer to suggest the exact SE", "the exact SE site when flagging off-topic questions. Or am I missing something?", "am I missing something? Is such an option available in addition to notifying", "would be nicer to suggest the exact SE site when flagging off-topic questions.", "I missing something? Is such an option available in addition to notifying it", "option when flagging a question as off topic. It would be nicer to", "flagging a question as off topic. It would be nicer to suggest the", "suggest the exact SE site when flagging off-topic questions. Or am I missing", "off topic. It would be nicer to suggest the exact SE site when", "questions. Or am I missing something? Is such an option available in addition", "all the SE sites are in the option when flagging a question as", "SE sites are in the option when flagging a question as off topic.", "SE site when flagging off-topic questions. Or am I missing something? Is such", "the option when flagging a question as off topic. It would be nicer", "flagging off-topic questions. Or am I missing something? Is such an option available", "a question as off topic. It would be nicer to suggest the exact", "off-topic questions. Or am I missing something? Is such an option available in", "the SE sites are in the option when flagging a question as off", "in the option when flagging a question as off topic. It would be", "to suggest the exact SE site when flagging off-topic questions. Or am I", "such an option available in addition to notifying it in the comments section?", "as off topic. It would be nicer to suggest the exact SE site", "be nicer to suggest the exact SE site when flagging off-topic questions. Or", "topic. It would be nicer to suggest the exact SE site when flagging", "when flagging a question as off topic. It would be nicer to suggest", "Not all the SE sites are in the option when flagging a question", "Is such an option available in addition to notifying it in the comments", "It would be nicer to suggest the exact SE site when flagging off-topic", "are in the option when flagging a question as off topic. It would", "missing something? Is such an option available in addition to notifying it in", "when flagging off-topic questions. Or am I missing something? Is such an option" ]
[ "**[Classroom Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)** I don't know if the site is scoped right. I don't", "it's showing promising returns. She's making fewer trips to the photocopier. Grading is", "when she's in the heat of battle, she can't ask for reinforcements. Her", "> > most T's don't use stacks. > > > I think maybe", "she works. I see how little support from colleagues she receives. Unlike a", "at her school. After a couple weeks, it's showing promising returns. She's making", "of jobs (like mine), when she's in the heat of battle, she can't", "could benefit massively from one. I think this because I live with a", "making fewer trips to the photocopier. Grading is easier. Students are engaging more.", "Outdated how-to's made implementation more difficult than it ever should have been. This", "and I think they could benefit massively from one. I think this because", "think they could benefit massively from one. I think this because I live", "don't know if it will work. A couple weeks ago I tweeted at", "prominent Google Classroom advocate asking for her opinion. [She said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736): > > most", "Hello one and all academics. I'm Sam and I work at Stack Exchange", "think maybe we can solve, and that's why I created a site proposal:", "her opinion. [She said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736): > > most T's don't use stacks. > >", "I live with a teacher and I see day and night how tirelessly", "it will work. A couple weeks ago I tweeted at a prominent Google", "There isn't a Stack Exchange site for K-12 teachers, and I think they", "job a little easier she's begun to implement Google Classroom at her school.", "promising returns. She's making fewer trips to the photocopier. Grading is easier. Students", "I think this because I live with a teacher and I see day", "documentation almost led her not to adopt it. Outdated how-to's made implementation more", "her school. After a couple weeks, it's showing promising returns. She's making fewer", "she can't ask for reinforcements. Her job is so. damn. hard. To make", "teacher and I see day and night how tirelessly she works. I see", "ever should have been. This is a problem I think maybe we can", "damn. hard. To make her job a little easier she's begun to implement", "to go! There isn't a Stack Exchange site for K-12 teachers, and I", "I don't know if the site is scoped right. I don't know if", "one and all academics. I'm Sam and I work at Stack Exchange Overflow.", "But a lack of teacher-focused documentation almost led her not to adopt it.", "begun to implement Google Classroom at her school. After a couple weeks, it's", "site proposal: **[Classroom Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)** I don't know if the site is scoped right.", "[She said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736): > > most T's don't use stacks. > > > I", "been. This is a problem I think maybe we can solve, and that's", "for K-12 teachers, and I think they could benefit massively from one. I", "is scoped right. I don't know if it will work. A couple weeks", "see day and night how tirelessly she works. I see how little support", "you because I'm not sure where else on the network to go! There", "if it will work. A couple weeks ago I tweeted at a prominent", "Google Classroom at her school. After a couple weeks, it's showing promising returns.", "teachers, and I think they could benefit massively from one. I think this", "from colleagues she receives. Unlike a lot of jobs (like mine), when she's", "the network to go! There isn't a Stack Exchange site for K-12 teachers,", "because I live with a teacher and I see day and night how", "reinforcements. Her job is so. damn. hard. To make her job a little", "teacher-focused documentation almost led her not to adopt it. Outdated how-to's made implementation", "stacks. > > > I think maybe that's true because we don't have", "I see how little support from colleagues she receives. Unlike a lot of", "> most T's don't use stacks. > > > I think maybe that's", "easier she's begun to implement Google Classroom at her school. After a couple", "lack of teacher-focused documentation almost led her not to adopt it. Outdated how-to's", "problem I think maybe we can solve, and that's why I created a", "implement Google Classroom at her school. After a couple weeks, it's showing promising", "and that's why I created a site proposal: **[Classroom Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)** I don't know", "from one. I think this because I live with a teacher and I", "to the photocopier. Grading is easier. Students are engaging more. But a lack", "scoped right. I don't know if it will work. A couple weeks ago", "> > > I think maybe that's true because we don't have one", "can't ask for reinforcements. Her job is so. damn. hard. To make her", "it ever should have been. This is a problem I think maybe we", "T's don't use stacks. > > > I think maybe that's true because", "a site proposal: **[Classroom Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)** I don't know if the site is scoped", "This is a problem I think maybe we can solve, and that's why", "Classroom advocate asking for her opinion. [She said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736): > > most T's don't", "weeks, it's showing promising returns. She's making fewer trips to the photocopier. Grading", "with a teacher and I see day and night how tirelessly she works.", "they could benefit massively from one. I think this because I live with", "I see day and night how tirelessly she works. I see how little", "is so. damn. hard. To make her job a little easier she's begun", "battle, she can't ask for reinforcements. Her job is so. damn. hard. To", "should have been. This is a problem I think maybe we can solve,", "Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)** I don't know if the site is scoped right. I don't know", "heat of battle, she can't ask for reinforcements. Her job is so. damn.", "a prominent Google Classroom advocate asking for her opinion. [She said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736): > >", "ask for reinforcements. Her job is so. damn. hard. To make her job", "come here before you because I'm not sure where else on the network", "of battle, she can't ask for reinforcements. Her job is so. damn. hard.", "I work at Stack Exchange Overflow. I come here before you because I'm", "Exchange site for K-12 teachers, and I think they could benefit massively from", "don't use stacks. > > > I think maybe that's true because we", "this because I live with a teacher and I see day and night", "a lot of jobs (like mine), when she's in the heat of battle,", "job is so. damn. hard. To make her job a little easier she's", "returns. She's making fewer trips to the photocopier. Grading is easier. Students are", "created a site proposal: **[Classroom Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)** I don't know if the site is", "maybe that's true because we don't have one yet. Curious what you think.", "use stacks. > > > I think maybe that's true because we don't", "Stack Exchange Overflow. I come here before you because I'm not sure where", "I don't know if it will work. A couple weeks ago I tweeted", "most T's don't use stacks. > > > I think maybe that's true", "I tweeted at a prominent Google Classroom advocate asking for her opinion. [She", "K-12 teachers, and I think they could benefit massively from one. I think", "She's making fewer trips to the photocopier. Grading is easier. Students are engaging", "more. But a lack of teacher-focused documentation almost led her not to adopt", "massively from one. I think this because I live with a teacher and", "(like mine), when she's in the heat of battle, she can't ask for", "implementation more difficult than it ever should have been. This is a problem", "solve, and that's why I created a site proposal: **[Classroom Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)** I don't", "if the site is scoped right. I don't know if it will work.", "a couple weeks, it's showing promising returns. She's making fewer trips to the", "on the network to go! There isn't a Stack Exchange site for K-12", "for reinforcements. Her job is so. damn. hard. To make her job a", "is easier. Students are engaging more. But a lack of teacher-focused documentation almost", "couple weeks ago I tweeted at a prominent Google Classroom advocate asking for", "Google Classroom advocate asking for her opinion. [She said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736): > > most T's", "think this because I live with a teacher and I see day and", "go! There isn't a Stack Exchange site for K-12 teachers, and I think", "more difficult than it ever should have been. This is a problem I", "Exchange Overflow. I come here before you because I'm not sure where else", "in the heat of battle, she can't ask for reinforcements. Her job is", "the site is scoped right. I don't know if it will work. A", "we can solve, and that's why I created a site proposal: **[Classroom Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)**", "a little easier she's begun to implement Google Classroom at her school. After", "of teacher-focused documentation almost led her not to adopt it. Outdated how-to's made", "> > I think maybe that's true because we don't have one yet.", "think maybe that's true because we don't have one yet. Curious what you", "to adopt it. Outdated how-to's made implementation more difficult than it ever should", "can solve, and that's why I created a site proposal: **[Classroom Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)** I", "she receives. Unlike a lot of jobs (like mine), when she's in the", "I think they could benefit massively from one. I think this because I", "I created a site proposal: **[Classroom Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)** I don't know if the site", "where else on the network to go! There isn't a Stack Exchange site", "at a prominent Google Classroom advocate asking for her opinion. [She said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736): >", "hard. To make her job a little easier she's begun to implement Google", "isn't a Stack Exchange site for K-12 teachers, and I think they could", "here before you because I'm not sure where else on the network to", "Grading is easier. Students are engaging more. But a lack of teacher-focused documentation", "Overflow. I come here before you because I'm not sure where else on", "are engaging more. But a lack of teacher-focused documentation almost led her not", "adopt it. Outdated how-to's made implementation more difficult than it ever should have", "than it ever should have been. This is a problem I think maybe", "the photocopier. Grading is easier. Students are engaging more. But a lack of", "and I work at Stack Exchange Overflow. I come here before you because", "and I see day and night how tirelessly she works. I see how", "jobs (like mine), when she's in the heat of battle, she can't ask", "weeks ago I tweeted at a prominent Google Classroom advocate asking for her", "know if it will work. A couple weeks ago I tweeted at a", "night how tirelessly she works. I see how little support from colleagues she", "at Stack Exchange Overflow. I come here before you because I'm not sure", "I'm not sure where else on the network to go! There isn't a", "site is scoped right. I don't know if it will work. A couple", "a lack of teacher-focused documentation almost led her not to adopt it. Outdated", "led her not to adopt it. Outdated how-to's made implementation more difficult than", "a problem I think maybe we can solve, and that's why I created", "Stack Exchange site for K-12 teachers, and I think they could benefit massively", "receives. Unlike a lot of jobs (like mine), when she's in the heat", "for her opinion. [She said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736): > > most T's don't use stacks. >", "I come here before you because I'm not sure where else on the", "mine), when she's in the heat of battle, she can't ask for reinforcements.", "the heat of battle, she can't ask for reinforcements. Her job is so.", "she's in the heat of battle, she can't ask for reinforcements. Her job", "right. I don't know if it will work. A couple weeks ago I", "little support from colleagues she receives. Unlike a lot of jobs (like mine),", "work. A couple weeks ago I tweeted at a prominent Google Classroom advocate", "a teacher and I see day and night how tirelessly she works. I", "Unlike a lot of jobs (like mine), when she's in the heat of", "one. I think this because I live with a teacher and I see", "After a couple weeks, it's showing promising returns. She's making fewer trips to", "tweeted at a prominent Google Classroom advocate asking for her opinion. [She said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736):", "work at Stack Exchange Overflow. I come here before you because I'm not", "Sam and I work at Stack Exchange Overflow. I come here before you", "asking for her opinion. [She said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736): > > most T's don't use stacks.", "is a problem I think maybe we can solve, and that's why I", "see how little support from colleagues she receives. Unlike a lot of jobs", "> I think maybe that's true because we don't have one yet. Curious", "ago I tweeted at a prominent Google Classroom advocate asking for her opinion.", "I'm Sam and I work at Stack Exchange Overflow. I come here before", "else on the network to go! There isn't a Stack Exchange site for", "why I created a site proposal: **[Classroom Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)** I don't know if the", "school. After a couple weeks, it's showing promising returns. She's making fewer trips", "showing promising returns. She's making fewer trips to the photocopier. Grading is easier.", "easier. Students are engaging more. But a lack of teacher-focused documentation almost led", "I think maybe that's true because we don't have one yet. Curious what", "couple weeks, it's showing promising returns. She's making fewer trips to the photocopier.", "almost led her not to adopt it. Outdated how-to's made implementation more difficult", "To make her job a little easier she's begun to implement Google Classroom", "it. Outdated how-to's made implementation more difficult than it ever should have been.", "colleagues she receives. Unlike a lot of jobs (like mine), when she's in", "said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736): > > most T's don't use stacks. > > > I think", "works. I see how little support from colleagues she receives. Unlike a lot", "have been. This is a problem I think maybe we can solve, and", "to implement Google Classroom at her school. After a couple weeks, it's showing", "little easier she's begun to implement Google Classroom at her school. After a", "lot of jobs (like mine), when she's in the heat of battle, she", "don't know if the site is scoped right. I don't know if it", "maybe we can solve, and that's why I created a site proposal: **[Classroom", "engaging more. But a lack of teacher-focused documentation almost led her not to", "because I'm not sure where else on the network to go! There isn't", "academics. I'm Sam and I work at Stack Exchange Overflow. I come here", "network to go! There isn't a Stack Exchange site for K-12 teachers, and", "benefit massively from one. I think this because I live with a teacher", "difficult than it ever should have been. This is a problem I think", "make her job a little easier she's begun to implement Google Classroom at", "support from colleagues she receives. Unlike a lot of jobs (like mine), when", "she's begun to implement Google Classroom at her school. After a couple weeks,", "site for K-12 teachers, and I think they could benefit massively from one.", "a Stack Exchange site for K-12 teachers, and I think they could benefit", "Her job is so. damn. hard. To make her job a little easier", "advocate asking for her opinion. [She said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736): > > most T's don't use", "not to adopt it. Outdated how-to's made implementation more difficult than it ever", "will work. A couple weeks ago I tweeted at a prominent Google Classroom", "I think maybe we can solve, and that's why I created a site", "and all academics. I'm Sam and I work at Stack Exchange Overflow. I", "before you because I'm not sure where else on the network to go!", "and night how tirelessly she works. I see how little support from colleagues", "that's why I created a site proposal: **[Classroom Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)** I don't know if", "tirelessly she works. I see how little support from colleagues she receives. Unlike", "A couple weeks ago I tweeted at a prominent Google Classroom advocate asking", "opinion. [She said](https://twitter.com/alicekeeler/status/641625665784180736): > > most T's don't use stacks. > > >", "made implementation more difficult than it ever should have been. This is a", "day and night how tirelessly she works. I see how little support from", "Students are engaging more. But a lack of teacher-focused documentation almost led her", "sure where else on the network to go! There isn't a Stack Exchange", "proposal: **[Classroom Tech](http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/90679/classroom-tech?referrer=p6Sj9uYUMG7oXm3CuwYaPg2)** I don't know if the site is scoped right. I", "photocopier. Grading is easier. Students are engaging more. But a lack of teacher-focused", "so. damn. hard. To make her job a little easier she's begun to", "not sure where else on the network to go! There isn't a Stack", "Classroom at her school. After a couple weeks, it's showing promising returns. She's", "how little support from colleagues she receives. Unlike a lot of jobs (like", "live with a teacher and I see day and night how tirelessly she", "how tirelessly she works. I see how little support from colleagues she receives.", "her job a little easier she's begun to implement Google Classroom at her", "fewer trips to the photocopier. Grading is easier. Students are engaging more. But", "her not to adopt it. Outdated how-to's made implementation more difficult than it", "how-to's made implementation more difficult than it ever should have been. This is", "all academics. I'm Sam and I work at Stack Exchange Overflow. I come", "know if the site is scoped right. I don't know if it will", "trips to the photocopier. Grading is easier. Students are engaging more. But a" ]
[ "already been asked somewhere within Academe and here provided a forum for publishing", "to make a place where the Doctors can come and push each other", "the place for developing different types of rapport, for developing best practices in", "convention. Now, SE has a voting model, yes? What is the legitimacy for", "and push each other a little rather than merely reinforce each other at", "for publishing such answers online, or is it also the place for developing", "perhaps yet universally agreed upon, and otherwise for keeping a bevy of PhDs", "or on the Internet itself to cross-fertilize standards of conduct across fields or", "Academa, rather than poseurs (that while having all the apparent credentials, act like", "than poseurs (that while having all the apparent credentials, act like children throwing", "a place where the Doctors can come and push each other a little", "wisened masters of the original ***ideals*** of Academa, rather than poseurs (that while", "Internet itself to cross-fertilize standards of conduct across fields or across Universities themselves.", "a moderator must be called in to take the helm and whisk the", "called in to take the helm and whisk the offenders out of the", "By that last question I mean, to make a place where the Doctors", "of the original ***ideals*** of Academa, rather than poseurs (that while having all", "of Academa, rather than poseurs (that while having all the apparent credentials, act", "answers online, or is it also the place for developing different types of", "Doctors can come and push each other a little rather than merely reinforce", "standards of conduct across fields or across Universities themselves. So the question is:", "case that A.SE is a place where people can get answers that have", "while having all the apparent credentials, act like children throwing a tantrum just", "such enormity, that a moderator must be called in to take the helm", "for developing different types of rapport, for developing best practices in academia which", "that are not with convention. Now, SE has a voting model, yes? What", "are not with convention. Now, SE has a voting model, yes? What is", "banter? By that last question I mean, to make a place where the", "it can only result in the inbreeding of already established and perhaps all-too-conventional", "for scolding other users when it can only result in the inbreeding of", "has a voting model, yes? What is the legitimacy for scolding other users", "hardly is any other place within Academe or on the Internet itself to", "original ***ideals*** of Academa, rather than poseurs (that while having all the apparent", "(i.e. harmless) banter? By that last question I mean, to make a place", "agreed upon, and otherwise for keeping a bevy of PhDs in line by", "forum for publishing such answers online, or is it also the place for", "in line by online (i.e. harmless) banter? By that last question I mean,", "reinforce each other at their weakest points, which seems to be where moderation", "done by actual wisened masters of the original ***ideals*** of Academa, rather than", "and here provided a forum for publishing such answers online, or is it", "can only result in the inbreeding of already established and perhaps all-too-conventional practices?", "for developing best practices in academia which are not perhaps yet universally agreed", "their weakest points, which seems to be where moderation is taking the site.", "developing different types of rapport, for developing best practices in academia which are", "within Academe and here provided a forum for publishing such answers online, or", "the case that A.SE is a place where people can get answers that", "online (i.e. harmless) banter? By that last question I mean, to make a", "the offenders out of the room. Is it the case that A.SE is", "out of the room. Is it the case that A.SE is a place", "answers that have already been asked somewhere within Academe and here provided a", "yes? What is the legitimacy for scolding other users when it can only", "or across Universities themselves. So the question is: When is moderation here done", "the room. Is it the case that A.SE is a place where people", "answers that are not with convention. Now, SE has a voting model, yes?", "there hardly is any other place within Academe or on the Internet itself", "What is the legitimacy for scolding other users when it can only result", "perhaps all-too-conventional practices? And then to suspend them, as if the threat to", "of ears of other PhDs is of such enormity, that a moderator must", "a place where people can get answers that have already been asked somewhere", "little rather than merely reinforce each other at their weakest points, which seems", "than merely reinforce each other at their weakest points, which seems to be", "to cross-fertilize standards of conduct across fields or across Universities themselves. So the", "harmless) banter? By that last question I mean, to make a place where", "of such enormity, that a moderator must be called in to take the", "asked somewhere within Academe and here provided a forum for publishing such answers", "each other at their weakest points, which seems to be where moderation is", "within Academe or on the Internet itself to cross-fertilize standards of conduct across", "masters of the original ***ideals*** of Academa, rather than poseurs (that while having", "and otherwise for keeping a bevy of PhDs in line by online (i.e.", "throwing a tantrum just because they still have their bit of power to", "providing answers that are not with convention. Now, SE has a voting model,", "must be called in to take the helm and whisk the offenders out", "be called in to take the helm and whisk the offenders out of", "get answers that have already been asked somewhere within Academe and here provided", "universally agreed upon, and otherwise for keeping a bevy of PhDs in line", "publishing such answers online, or is it also the place for developing different", "them, as if the threat to the eyes of ears of other PhDs", "PhDs in line by online (i.e. harmless) banter? By that last question I", "taking the site. For there hardly is any other place within Academe or", "the legitimacy for scolding other users when it can only result in the", "the inbreeding of already established and perhaps all-too-conventional practices? And then to suspend", "by online (i.e. harmless) banter? By that last question I mean, to make", "the question is: When is moderation here done by actual wisened masters of", "moderator must be called in to take the helm and whisk the offenders", "having all the apparent credentials, act like children throwing a tantrum just because", "best practices in academia which are not perhaps yet universally agreed upon, and", "to the eyes of ears of other PhDs is of such enormity, that", "by actual wisened masters of the original ***ideals*** of Academa, rather than poseurs", "children throwing a tantrum just because they still have their bit of power", "come and push each other a little rather than merely reinforce each other", "fields or across Universities themselves. So the question is: When is moderation here", "different types of rapport, for developing best practices in academia which are not", "*questionable* comments or providing answers that are not with convention. Now, SE has", "rather than merely reinforce each other at their weakest points, which seems to", "inbreeding of already established and perhaps all-too-conventional practices? And then to suspend them,", "is the legitimacy for scolding other users when it can only result in", "people can get answers that have already been asked somewhere within Academe and", "are not perhaps yet universally agreed upon, and otherwise for keeping a bevy", "conduct across fields or across Universities themselves. So the question is: When is", "room. Is it the case that A.SE is a place where people can", "for keeping a bevy of PhDs in line by online (i.e. harmless) banter?", "points, which seems to be where moderation is taking the site. For there", "push each other a little rather than merely reinforce each other at their", "seems to be where moderation is taking the site. For there hardly is", "users when it can only result in the inbreeding of already established and", "place for developing different types of rapport, for developing best practices in academia", "themselves. So the question is: When is moderation here done by actual wisened", "is a place where people can get answers that have already been asked", "a tantrum just because they still have their bit of power to wield)?", "the eyes of ears of other PhDs is of such enormity, that a", "to suspend them, as if the threat to the eyes of ears of", "a little rather than merely reinforce each other at their weakest points, which", "that A.SE is a place where people can get answers that have already", "across Universities themselves. So the question is: When is moderation here done by", "a voting model, yes? What is the legitimacy for scolding other users when", "online, or is it also the place for developing different types of rapport,", "it the case that A.SE is a place where people can get answers", "to be where moderation is taking the site. For there hardly is any", "comments or providing answers that are not with convention. Now, SE has a", "otherwise for keeping a bevy of PhDs in line by online (i.e. harmless)", "weakest points, which seems to be where moderation is taking the site. For", "of rapport, for developing best practices in academia which are not perhaps yet", "enormity, that a moderator must be called in to take the helm and", "moderation is taking the site. For there hardly is any other place within", "is any other place within Academe or on the Internet itself to cross-fertilize", "merely reinforce each other at their weakest points, which seems to be where", "then to suspend them, as if the threat to the eyes of ears", "like children throwing a tantrum just because they still have their bit of", "be where moderation is taking the site. For there hardly is any other", "where moderation is taking the site. For there hardly is any other place", "can get answers that have already been asked somewhere within Academe and here", "a bevy of PhDs in line by online (i.e. harmless) banter? By that", "of PhDs in line by online (i.e. harmless) banter? By that last question", "mean, to make a place where the Doctors can come and push each", "credentials, act like children throwing a tantrum just because they still have their", "is taking the site. For there hardly is any other place within Academe", "For there hardly is any other place within Academe or on the Internet", "here done by actual wisened masters of the original ***ideals*** of Academa, rather", "when it can only result in the inbreeding of already established and perhaps", "other users when it can only result in the inbreeding of already established", "practices? And then to suspend them, as if the threat to the eyes", "legitimacy for scolding other users when it can only result in the inbreeding", "not perhaps yet universally agreed upon, and otherwise for keeping a bevy of", "mere *questionable* comments or providing answers that are not with convention. Now, SE", "of the room. Is it the case that A.SE is a place where", "place within Academe or on the Internet itself to cross-fertilize standards of conduct", "on the Internet itself to cross-fertilize standards of conduct across fields or across", "across fields or across Universities themselves. So the question is: When is moderation", "to take the helm and whisk the offenders out of the room. Is", "the helm and whisk the offenders out of the room. Is it the", "Is it the case that A.SE is a place where people can get", "several occasions, moderators have suspended an account (your's truly) for making mere *questionable*", "cross-fertilize standards of conduct across fields or across Universities themselves. So the question", "is moderation here done by actual wisened masters of the original ***ideals*** of", "with convention. Now, SE has a voting model, yes? What is the legitimacy", "scolding other users when it can only result in the inbreeding of already", "is: When is moderation here done by actual wisened masters of the original", "occasions, moderators have suspended an account (your's truly) for making mere *questionable* comments", "last question I mean, to make a place where the Doctors can come", "making mere *questionable* comments or providing answers that are not with convention. Now,", "the Internet itself to cross-fertilize standards of conduct across fields or across Universities", "of other PhDs is of such enormity, that a moderator must be called", "PhDs is of such enormity, that a moderator must be called in to", "So the question is: When is moderation here done by actual wisened masters", "the original ***ideals*** of Academa, rather than poseurs (that while having all the", "and whisk the offenders out of the room. Is it the case that", "line by online (i.e. harmless) banter? By that last question I mean, to", "have already been asked somewhere within Academe and here provided a forum for", "any other place within Academe or on the Internet itself to cross-fertilize standards", "act like children throwing a tantrum just because they still have their bit", "an account (your's truly) for making mere *questionable* comments or providing answers that", "that a moderator must be called in to take the helm and whisk", "that have already been asked somewhere within Academe and here provided a forum", "On several occasions, moderators have suspended an account (your's truly) for making mere", "for making mere *questionable* comments or providing answers that are not with convention.", "truly) for making mere *questionable* comments or providing answers that are not with", "and perhaps all-too-conventional practices? And then to suspend them, as if the threat", "in to take the helm and whisk the offenders out of the room.", "been asked somewhere within Academe and here provided a forum for publishing such", "each other a little rather than merely reinforce each other at their weakest", "it also the place for developing different types of rapport, for developing best", "have suspended an account (your's truly) for making mere *questionable* comments or providing", "as if the threat to the eyes of ears of other PhDs is", "A.SE is a place where people can get answers that have already been", "helm and whisk the offenders out of the room. Is it the case", "question I mean, to make a place where the Doctors can come and", "yet universally agreed upon, and otherwise for keeping a bevy of PhDs in", "which seems to be where moderation is taking the site. For there hardly", "(that while having all the apparent credentials, act like children throwing a tantrum", "rapport, for developing best practices in academia which are not perhaps yet universally", "moderators have suspended an account (your's truly) for making mere *questionable* comments or", "the threat to the eyes of ears of other PhDs is of such", "rather than poseurs (that while having all the apparent credentials, act like children", "of already established and perhaps all-too-conventional practices? And then to suspend them, as", "take the helm and whisk the offenders out of the room. Is it", "practices in academia which are not perhaps yet universally agreed upon, and otherwise", "where the Doctors can come and push each other a little rather than", "place where people can get answers that have already been asked somewhere within", "in academia which are not perhaps yet universally agreed upon, and otherwise for", "which are not perhaps yet universally agreed upon, and otherwise for keeping a", "also the place for developing different types of rapport, for developing best practices", "if the threat to the eyes of ears of other PhDs is of", "such answers online, or is it also the place for developing different types", "Academe or on the Internet itself to cross-fertilize standards of conduct across fields", "And then to suspend them, as if the threat to the eyes of", "When is moderation here done by actual wisened masters of the original ***ideals***", "make a place where the Doctors can come and push each other a", "voting model, yes? What is the legitimacy for scolding other users when it", "Now, SE has a voting model, yes? What is the legitimacy for scolding", "result in the inbreeding of already established and perhaps all-too-conventional practices? And then", "whisk the offenders out of the room. Is it the case that A.SE", "upon, and otherwise for keeping a bevy of PhDs in line by online", "offenders out of the room. Is it the case that A.SE is a", "other place within Academe or on the Internet itself to cross-fertilize standards of", "not with convention. Now, SE has a voting model, yes? What is the", "itself to cross-fertilize standards of conduct across fields or across Universities themselves. So", "the apparent credentials, act like children throwing a tantrum just because they still", "all-too-conventional practices? And then to suspend them, as if the threat to the", "eyes of ears of other PhDs is of such enormity, that a moderator", "is of such enormity, that a moderator must be called in to take", "account (your's truly) for making mere *questionable* comments or providing answers that are", "(your's truly) for making mere *questionable* comments or providing answers that are not", "here provided a forum for publishing such answers online, or is it also", "actual wisened masters of the original ***ideals*** of Academa, rather than poseurs (that", "place where the Doctors can come and push each other a little rather", "other PhDs is of such enormity, that a moderator must be called in", "the Doctors can come and push each other a little rather than merely", "provided a forum for publishing such answers online, or is it also the", "academia which are not perhaps yet universally agreed upon, and otherwise for keeping", "other a little rather than merely reinforce each other at their weakest points,", "site. For there hardly is any other place within Academe or on the", "model, yes? What is the legitimacy for scolding other users when it can", "threat to the eyes of ears of other PhDs is of such enormity,", "established and perhaps all-too-conventional practices? And then to suspend them, as if the", "Universities themselves. So the question is: When is moderation here done by actual", "where people can get answers that have already been asked somewhere within Academe", "is it also the place for developing different types of rapport, for developing", "suspend them, as if the threat to the eyes of ears of other", "developing best practices in academia which are not perhaps yet universally agreed upon,", "ears of other PhDs is of such enormity, that a moderator must be", "bevy of PhDs in line by online (i.e. harmless) banter? By that last", "of conduct across fields or across Universities themselves. So the question is: When", "question is: When is moderation here done by actual wisened masters of the", "already established and perhaps all-too-conventional practices? And then to suspend them, as if", "Academe and here provided a forum for publishing such answers online, or is", "at their weakest points, which seems to be where moderation is taking the", "***ideals*** of Academa, rather than poseurs (that while having all the apparent credentials,", "a forum for publishing such answers online, or is it also the place", "that last question I mean, to make a place where the Doctors can", "SE has a voting model, yes? What is the legitimacy for scolding other", "types of rapport, for developing best practices in academia which are not perhaps", "I mean, to make a place where the Doctors can come and push", "other at their weakest points, which seems to be where moderation is taking", "apparent credentials, act like children throwing a tantrum just because they still have", "can come and push each other a little rather than merely reinforce each", "the site. For there hardly is any other place within Academe or on", "suspended an account (your's truly) for making mere *questionable* comments or providing answers", "somewhere within Academe and here provided a forum for publishing such answers online,", "all the apparent credentials, act like children throwing a tantrum just because they", "moderation here done by actual wisened masters of the original ***ideals*** of Academa,", "or is it also the place for developing different types of rapport, for", "keeping a bevy of PhDs in line by online (i.e. harmless) banter? By", "poseurs (that while having all the apparent credentials, act like children throwing a", "in the inbreeding of already established and perhaps all-too-conventional practices? And then to", "or providing answers that are not with convention. Now, SE has a voting", "only result in the inbreeding of already established and perhaps all-too-conventional practices? And" ]
[ "are you to be able to say what is correct and what is", "the claim with a reference. It is basically equivalent to writing \"you are", "title in the university world. Then Poko R. Xlark puts on a moderator", "but I really feel like he is the one acting out of line", "a professor title in front of TheDoctor. I find it a highly questionable", "it a highly questionable behavior. Is the argument here \"aeismail is correct because", "being one promotes vigilante behavior. Poko R. Xlark is a valued member of", "what is correct and what is not? I don't find it out line", "this community, as his reputation proves, but I really feel like he is", "writing \"you are wrong\". This is not how a polite discussion should start.", "of TheDoctor. I find it a highly questionable behavior. Is the argument here", "black lozenge next to his name) and threatens TheDoctor with a suspension. This", "mean? Who are you to be able to say what is correct and", "in front of TheDoctor. I find it a highly questionable behavior. Is the", "suspension. This puzzles me, too. We have appointed moderators; acting like one without", "sarcastic, aims to point this out this in a playful way: what does", "point this out this in a playful way: what does \"correct\" mean? Who", "appeals to authority as a general practice. I have rarely seen people pointing", "he is a professor\"? That is the exact opposite of science, and in", "That is the exact opposite of science, and in my view academia should", "also with the following comment by Poko R. Xlark. The first thing it", "out each other's title in the university world. Then Poko R. Xlark puts", "TheDoctor acknowledges it and answers like a sensible person. I have some issues", "puts on a moderator hat (without being one -- I don't see a", "I don't see a black lozenge next to his name) and threatens TheDoctor", "to <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/54888/958>. I am a bit puzzled by the way the discussion has", "to his name) and threatens TheDoctor with a suspension. This puzzles me, too.", "rarely seen people pointing out each other's title in the university world. Then", "comment), TheDoctor acknowledges it and answers like a sensible person. I have some", "claims that this is not \"correct usage\", without backing up the claim with", "promotes vigilante behavior. Poko R. Xlark is a valued member of this community,", "bit puzzled by the way the discussion has evolved. In my view, aeismail's", "some issues also with the following comment by Poko R. Xlark. The first", "this is not \"correct usage\", without backing up the claim with a reference.", "I have some issues also with the following comment by Poko R. Xlark.", "thing it does is throwing a professor title in front of TheDoctor. I", "does is throwing a professor title in front of TheDoctor. I find it", "I find it a highly questionable behavior. Is the argument here \"aeismail is", "world. Then Poko R. Xlark puts on a moderator hat (without being one", "here \"aeismail is correct because he is a professor\"? That is the exact", "discuss the comments to <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/54888/958>. I am a bit puzzled by the way", "title in front of TheDoctor. I find it a highly questionable behavior. Is", "of science, and in my view academia should frown upon these appeals to", "to point this out this in a playful way: what does \"correct\" mean?", "one promotes vigilante behavior. Poko R. Xlark is a valued member of this", "aeismail's comment is sloppy, since it just claims that this is not \"correct", "equivalent to writing \"you are wrong\". This is not how a polite discussion", "Is the argument here \"aeismail is correct because he is a professor\"? That", "have appointed moderators; acting like one without being one promotes vigilante behavior. Poko", "\"correct\" mean? Who are you to be able to say what is correct", "without backing up the claim with a reference. It is basically equivalent to", "a reference. It is basically equivalent to writing \"you are wrong\". This is", "out this in a playful way: what does \"correct\" mean? Who are you", "a highly questionable behavior. Is the argument here \"aeismail is correct because he", "The first thing it does is throwing a professor title in front of", "to authority as a general practice. I have rarely seen people pointing out", "it out line at all (no more than the first comment, anyway). In", "general practice. I have rarely seen people pointing out each other's title in", "university world. Then Poko R. Xlark puts on a moderator hat (without being", "of this community, as his reputation proves, but I really feel like he", "would like to discuss the comments to <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/54888/958>. I am a bit puzzled", "are wrong\". This is not how a polite discussion should start. TheDoctor's answer,", "with a real argument against his suggested practice (rpattiso's comment), TheDoctor acknowledges it", "(rpattiso's comment), TheDoctor acknowledges it and answers like a sensible person. I have", "This puzzles me, too. We have appointed moderators; acting like one without being", "a sensible person. I have some issues also with the following comment by", "puzzles me, too. We have appointed moderators; acting like one without being one", "Poko R. Xlark. The first thing it does is throwing a professor title", "correct because he is a professor\"? That is the exact opposite of science,", "too. We have appointed moderators; acting like one without being one promotes vigilante", "against his suggested practice (rpattiso's comment), TheDoctor acknowledges it and answers like a", "in the university world. Then Poko R. Xlark puts on a moderator hat", "a black lozenge next to his name) and threatens TheDoctor with a suspension.", "is not \"correct usage\", without backing up the claim with a reference. It", "is not how a polite discussion should start. TheDoctor's answer, albeit sarcastic, aims", "professor\"? That is the exact opposite of science, and in my view academia", "Xlark puts on a moderator hat (without being one -- I don't see", "how a polite discussion should start. TheDoctor's answer, albeit sarcastic, aims to point", "TheDoctor with a suspension. This puzzles me, too. We have appointed moderators; acting", "out line at all (no more than the first comment, anyway). In fact,", "questionable behavior. Is the argument here \"aeismail is correct because he is a", "the university world. Then Poko R. Xlark puts on a moderator hat (without", "argument against his suggested practice (rpattiso's comment), TheDoctor acknowledges it and answers like", "his reputation proves, but I really feel like he is the one acting", "the way the discussion has evolved. In my view, aeismail's comment is sloppy,", "\"aeismail is correct because he is a professor\"? That is the exact opposite", "exact opposite of science, and in my view academia should frown upon these", "as a general practice. I have rarely seen people pointing out each other's", "view academia should frown upon these appeals to authority as a general practice.", "is basically equivalent to writing \"you are wrong\". This is not how a", "with a reference. It is basically equivalent to writing \"you are wrong\". This", "is a valued member of this community, as his reputation proves, but I", "discussion has evolved. In my view, aeismail's comment is sloppy, since it just", "Who are you to be able to say what is correct and what", "We have appointed moderators; acting like one without being one promotes vigilante behavior.", "\"correct usage\", without backing up the claim with a reference. It is basically", "like a sensible person. I have some issues also with the following comment", "have rarely seen people pointing out each other's title in the university world.", "Poko R. Xlark is a valued member of this community, as his reputation", "opposite of science, and in my view academia should frown upon these appeals", "way the discussion has evolved. In my view, aeismail's comment is sloppy, since", "to be able to say what is correct and what is not? I", "other's title in the university world. Then Poko R. Xlark puts on a", "throwing a professor title in front of TheDoctor. I find it a highly", "behavior. Is the argument here \"aeismail is correct because he is a professor\"?", "say what is correct and what is not? I don't find it out", "find it out line at all (no more than the first comment, anyway).", "comments to <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/54888/958>. I am a bit puzzled by the way the discussion", "is correct because he is a professor\"? That is the exact opposite of", "is a professor\"? That is the exact opposite of science, and in my", "albeit sarcastic, aims to point this out this in a playful way: what", "front of TheDoctor. I find it a highly questionable behavior. Is the argument", "being one -- I don't see a black lozenge next to his name)", "moderator hat (without being one -- I don't see a black lozenge next", "and threatens TheDoctor with a suspension. This puzzles me, too. We have appointed", "basically equivalent to writing \"you are wrong\". This is not how a polite", "don't see a black lozenge next to his name) and threatens TheDoctor with", "a professor\"? That is the exact opposite of science, and in my view", "answer, albeit sarcastic, aims to point this out this in a playful way:", "sloppy, since it just claims that this is not \"correct usage\", without backing", "pointing out each other's title in the university world. Then Poko R. Xlark", "my view, aeismail's comment is sloppy, since it just claims that this is", "Xlark is a valued member of this community, as his reputation proves, but", "it just claims that this is not \"correct usage\", without backing up the", "sensible person. I have some issues also with the following comment by Poko", "his name) and threatens TheDoctor with a suspension. This puzzles me, too. We", "is sloppy, since it just claims that this is not \"correct usage\", without", "my view academia should frown upon these appeals to authority as a general", "acting like one without being one promotes vigilante behavior. Poko R. Xlark is", "not? I don't find it out line at all (no more than the", "like one without being one promotes vigilante behavior. Poko R. Xlark is a", "R. Xlark is a valued member of this community, as his reputation proves,", "the discussion has evolved. In my view, aeismail's comment is sloppy, since it", "proves, but I really feel like he is the one acting out of", "is correct and what is not? I don't find it out line at", "This is not how a polite discussion should start. TheDoctor's answer, albeit sarcastic,", "(without being one -- I don't see a black lozenge next to his", "In my view, aeismail's comment is sloppy, since it just claims that this", "academia should frown upon these appeals to authority as a general practice. I", "issues also with the following comment by Poko R. Xlark. The first thing", "discussion should start. TheDoctor's answer, albeit sarcastic, aims to point this out this", "is the exact opposite of science, and in my view academia should frown", "usage\", without backing up the claim with a reference. It is basically equivalent", "not \"correct usage\", without backing up the claim with a reference. It is", "is throwing a professor title in front of TheDoctor. I find it a", "one without being one promotes vigilante behavior. Poko R. Xlark is a valued", "on a moderator hat (without being one -- I don't see a black", "I really feel like he is the one acting out of line here.", "R. Xlark puts on a moderator hat (without being one -- I don't", "up the claim with a reference. It is basically equivalent to writing \"you", "fact, when confronted with a real argument against his suggested practice (rpattiso's comment),", "real argument against his suggested practice (rpattiso's comment), TheDoctor acknowledges it and answers", "science, and in my view academia should frown upon these appeals to authority", "at all (no more than the first comment, anyway). In fact, when confronted", "practice. I have rarely seen people pointing out each other's title in the", "I would like to discuss the comments to <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/54888/958>. I am a bit", "appointed moderators; acting like one without being one promotes vigilante behavior. Poko R.", "view, aeismail's comment is sloppy, since it just claims that this is not", "valued member of this community, as his reputation proves, but I really feel", "find it a highly questionable behavior. Is the argument here \"aeismail is correct", "evolved. In my view, aeismail's comment is sloppy, since it just claims that", "the comments to <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/54888/958>. I am a bit puzzled by the way the", "be able to say what is correct and what is not? I don't", "see a black lozenge next to his name) and threatens TheDoctor with a", "a playful way: what does \"correct\" mean? Who are you to be able", "way: what does \"correct\" mean? Who are you to be able to say", "does \"correct\" mean? Who are you to be able to say what is", "-- I don't see a black lozenge next to his name) and threatens", "to discuss the comments to <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/54888/958>. I am a bit puzzled by the", "vigilante behavior. Poko R. Xlark is a valued member of this community, as", "R. Xlark. The first thing it does is throwing a professor title in", "because he is a professor\"? That is the exact opposite of science, and", "name) and threatens TheDoctor with a suspension. This puzzles me, too. We have", "to say what is correct and what is not? I don't find it", "Xlark. The first thing it does is throwing a professor title in front", "a general practice. I have rarely seen people pointing out each other's title", "each other's title in the university world. Then Poko R. Xlark puts on", "his suggested practice (rpattiso's comment), TheDoctor acknowledges it and answers like a sensible", "wrong\". This is not how a polite discussion should start. TheDoctor's answer, albeit", "with the following comment by Poko R. Xlark. The first thing it does", "highly questionable behavior. Is the argument here \"aeismail is correct because he is", "the argument here \"aeismail is correct because he is a professor\"? That is", "you to be able to say what is correct and what is not?", "these appeals to authority as a general practice. I have rarely seen people", "this out this in a playful way: what does \"correct\" mean? Who are", "one -- I don't see a black lozenge next to his name) and", "member of this community, as his reputation proves, but I really feel like", "by the way the discussion has evolved. In my view, aeismail's comment is", "person. I have some issues also with the following comment by Poko R.", "first thing it does is throwing a professor title in front of TheDoctor.", "a moderator hat (without being one -- I don't see a black lozenge", "comment, anyway). In fact, when confronted with a real argument against his suggested", "comment by Poko R. Xlark. The first thing it does is throwing a", "frown upon these appeals to authority as a general practice. I have rarely", "and what is not? I don't find it out line at all (no", "playful way: what does \"correct\" mean? Who are you to be able to", "the first comment, anyway). In fact, when confronted with a real argument against", "the following comment by Poko R. Xlark. The first thing it does is", "following comment by Poko R. Xlark. The first thing it does is throwing", "argument here \"aeismail is correct because he is a professor\"? That is the", "what does \"correct\" mean? Who are you to be able to say what", "authority as a general practice. I have rarely seen people pointing out each", "I have rarely seen people pointing out each other's title in the university", "people pointing out each other's title in the university world. Then Poko R.", "reputation proves, but I really feel like he is the one acting out", "a valued member of this community, as his reputation proves, but I really", "puzzled by the way the discussion has evolved. In my view, aeismail's comment", "I don't find it out line at all (no more than the first", "what is not? I don't find it out line at all (no more", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/54888/958>. I am a bit puzzled by the way the discussion has evolved.", "anyway). In fact, when confronted with a real argument against his suggested practice", "\"you are wrong\". This is not how a polite discussion should start. TheDoctor's", "moderators; acting like one without being one promotes vigilante behavior. Poko R. Xlark", "am a bit puzzled by the way the discussion has evolved. In my", "with a suspension. This puzzles me, too. We have appointed moderators; acting like", "a polite discussion should start. TheDoctor's answer, albeit sarcastic, aims to point this", "a bit puzzled by the way the discussion has evolved. In my view,", "is not? I don't find it out line at all (no more than", "it and answers like a sensible person. I have some issues also with", "(no more than the first comment, anyway). In fact, when confronted with a", "comment is sloppy, since it just claims that this is not \"correct usage\",", "reference. It is basically equivalent to writing \"you are wrong\". This is not", "community, as his reputation proves, but I really feel like he is the", "in my view academia should frown upon these appeals to authority as a", "lozenge next to his name) and threatens TheDoctor with a suspension. This puzzles", "should frown upon these appeals to authority as a general practice. I have", "TheDoctor's answer, albeit sarcastic, aims to point this out this in a playful", "polite discussion should start. TheDoctor's answer, albeit sarcastic, aims to point this out", "than the first comment, anyway). In fact, when confronted with a real argument", "me, too. We have appointed moderators; acting like one without being one promotes", "I am a bit puzzled by the way the discussion has evolved. In", "line at all (no more than the first comment, anyway). In fact, when", "when confronted with a real argument against his suggested practice (rpattiso's comment), TheDoctor", "by Poko R. Xlark. The first thing it does is throwing a professor", "claim with a reference. It is basically equivalent to writing \"you are wrong\".", "without being one promotes vigilante behavior. Poko R. Xlark is a valued member", "all (no more than the first comment, anyway). In fact, when confronted with", "a real argument against his suggested practice (rpattiso's comment), TheDoctor acknowledges it and", "answers like a sensible person. I have some issues also with the following", "confronted with a real argument against his suggested practice (rpattiso's comment), TheDoctor acknowledges", "and answers like a sensible person. I have some issues also with the", "to writing \"you are wrong\". This is not how a polite discussion should", "aims to point this out this in a playful way: what does \"correct\"", "a suspension. This puzzles me, too. We have appointed moderators; acting like one", "professor title in front of TheDoctor. I find it a highly questionable behavior.", "first comment, anyway). In fact, when confronted with a real argument against his", "next to his name) and threatens TheDoctor with a suspension. This puzzles me,", "TheDoctor. I find it a highly questionable behavior. Is the argument here \"aeismail", "threatens TheDoctor with a suspension. This puzzles me, too. We have appointed moderators;", "since it just claims that this is not \"correct usage\", without backing up", "not how a polite discussion should start. TheDoctor's answer, albeit sarcastic, aims to", "able to say what is correct and what is not? I don't find", "has evolved. In my view, aeismail's comment is sloppy, since it just claims", "don't find it out line at all (no more than the first comment,", "Then Poko R. Xlark puts on a moderator hat (without being one --", "have some issues also with the following comment by Poko R. Xlark. The", "backing up the claim with a reference. It is basically equivalent to writing", "this in a playful way: what does \"correct\" mean? Who are you to", "correct and what is not? I don't find it out line at all", "practice (rpattiso's comment), TheDoctor acknowledges it and answers like a sensible person. I", "start. TheDoctor's answer, albeit sarcastic, aims to point this out this in a", "it does is throwing a professor title in front of TheDoctor. I find", "the exact opposite of science, and in my view academia should frown upon", "Poko R. Xlark puts on a moderator hat (without being one -- I", "and in my view academia should frown upon these appeals to authority as", "as his reputation proves, but I really feel like he is the one", "behavior. Poko R. Xlark is a valued member of this community, as his", "It is basically equivalent to writing \"you are wrong\". This is not how", "In fact, when confronted with a real argument against his suggested practice (rpattiso's", "upon these appeals to authority as a general practice. I have rarely seen", "seen people pointing out each other's title in the university world. Then Poko", "should start. TheDoctor's answer, albeit sarcastic, aims to point this out this in", "more than the first comment, anyway). In fact, when confronted with a real", "in a playful way: what does \"correct\" mean? Who are you to be", "suggested practice (rpattiso's comment), TheDoctor acknowledges it and answers like a sensible person.", "like to discuss the comments to <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/54888/958>. I am a bit puzzled by", "acknowledges it and answers like a sensible person. I have some issues also", "hat (without being one -- I don't see a black lozenge next to", "that this is not \"correct usage\", without backing up the claim with a", "just claims that this is not \"correct usage\", without backing up the claim" ]
[ "few paragraphs. > > > I think this question is logical and is", "answers would be too long for this format. Please add details to narrow", "my question and have added more specific details. I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide) question", "> > > I think this question is logical and is similar to", "too many possible answers, or good answers would be too long for this", "that can be answered in a few paragraphs. > > > I think", "do other questions I mentioned. What kind of specificity you are looking for", "answered in a few paragraphs. > > > I think this question is", "have added more specific details. I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide) question today. It is", "**UPDATE**: I have edited my question and have added more specific details. I", "to isolate an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs. >", "like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework) and [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au). I agree my question will have many answers ,", "posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide) question today. It is on hold saying > > There are", "I agree my question will have many answers , so do other questions", "issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs. > > > I", "today. It is on hold saying > > There are either too many", "edited my question and have added more specific details. I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide)", "this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate", "either too many possible answers, or good answers would be too long for", "isolate an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs. > >", "be answered in a few paragraphs. > > > I think this question", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au). I agree my question will have many answers , so do other", "my question will have many answers , so do other questions I mentioned.", "question will have many answers , so do other questions I mentioned. What", "for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or to", "saying > > There are either too many possible answers, or good answers", "would be too long for this format. Please add details to narrow the", "can be answered in a few paragraphs. > > > I think this", "I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide) question today. It is on hold saying > >", "narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that can be answered", "format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an", "Please add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue", "> > I think this question is logical and is similar to many", "so do other questions I mentioned. What kind of specificity you are looking", "similar to many other questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework) and [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au). I agree my question", ", so do other questions I mentioned. What kind of specificity you are", "this question is logical and is similar to many other questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework)", "too long for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set", "long for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or", "or good answers would be too long for this format. Please add details", "> I think this question is logical and is similar to many other", "hold saying > > There are either too many possible answers, or good", "It is on hold saying > > There are either too many possible", "details. I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide) question today. It is on hold saying >", "is on hold saying > > There are either too many possible answers,", "answer set or to isolate an issue that can be answered in a", "I have edited my question and have added more specific details. I have", "agree my question will have many answers , so do other questions I", "think this question is logical and is similar to many other questions like", "many answers , so do other questions I mentioned. What kind of specificity", "will have many answers , so do other questions I mentioned. What kind", "many other questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework) and [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au). I agree my question will have", "a few paragraphs. > > > I think this question is logical and", "question and have added more specific details. I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide) question today.", "and is similar to many other questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework) and [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au). I agree", "answers , so do other questions I mentioned. What kind of specificity you", "set or to isolate an issue that can be answered in a few", "other questions I mentioned. What kind of specificity you are looking for ?", "I think this question is logical and is similar to many other questions", "question today. It is on hold saying > > There are either too", "answers, or good answers would be too long for this format. Please add", "and have added more specific details. I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide) question today. It", "is logical and is similar to many other questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework) and [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au).", "specific details. I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide) question today. It is on hold saying", "questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework) and [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au). I agree my question will have many answers", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework) and [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au). I agree my question will have many answers , so", "add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide) question today. It is on hold saying > > There are either", "good answers would be too long for this format. Please add details to", "logical and is similar to many other questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework) and [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au). I", "to many other questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework) and [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au). I agree my question will", "have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide) question today. It is on hold saying > > There", "details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that can", "have edited my question and have added more specific details. I have posted", "many possible answers, or good answers would be too long for this format.", "paragraphs. > > > I think this question is logical and is similar", "other questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework) and [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au). I agree my question will have many", "more specific details. I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide) question today. It is on hold", "There are either too many possible answers, or good answers would be too", "or to isolate an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs.", "on hold saying > > There are either too many possible answers, or", "question is logical and is similar to many other questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework) and", "added more specific details. I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54976/what-information-to-share-and-what-to-hide) question today. It is on", "have many answers , so do other questions I mentioned. What kind of", "are either too many possible answers, or good answers would be too long", "in a few paragraphs. > > > I think this question is logical", "is similar to many other questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54765/what-to-do-with-students-coming-to-office-hours-asking-to-check-their-homework) and [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au). I agree my", "and [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/54874/how-to-explain-to-a-student-that-it-is-common-to-include-a-supervisor-as-a-co-au). I agree my question will have many answers , so do", "the answer set or to isolate an issue that can be answered in", "> There are either too many possible answers, or good answers would be", "an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs. > > >", "possible answers, or good answers would be too long for this format. Please", "to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that can be", "> > There are either too many possible answers, or good answers would", "be too long for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer" ]
[ "questions but also helps the asker. It may keep some askers from asking", "also get some questions where a step in the editorial process took ridiculously", "asking in the first place or help them to focus their question on", "us dealing with such questions but also helps the asker. It may keep", "tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or opposition by voting on the", "a canonical question.** We may use it as a duplicate for questions such", "master question. **I here propose to create such a canonical question.** We may", "is the typical workflow of a journal? * How are the individual steps", "shall be a community wiki and cover: * What is the typical workflow", "that [the editor has to evaluate the reviews].* As different journals or editorial", "understand some step in the editiorial process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734), think some step takes too long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734)", "too long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734) or are just very worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734). We also get some questions where", "to focus their question on what is not covered by the canonical question.", "where a step in the editorial process took ridiculously long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734). (e.g., a month", "message probably means that [the editor has to evaluate the reviews].* As different", "questions where a step in the editorial process took ridiculously long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734). (e.g., a", "the asker. It may keep some askers from asking in the first place", "individual steps of this workflow named in different editiorial systems? * What are", "systems? * What are the typical durations of individual steps, if they can", "This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval", "answer most of them only by reiterating one of the following: * *We", "means that [the editor has to evaluate the reviews].* As different journals or", "systems use different status messages, and review times vary greatly across fields, this", "the editiorial process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734), think some step takes too long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734) or are just very", "across fields, this leads to questions that aren’t exactly duplicates of each other", "be a community wiki and cover: * What is the typical workflow of", "how a journal works and do not understand some step in the editiorial", "long.* * *The status message probably means that [the editor has to evaluate", "the above, which does not only avoid us dealing with such questions but", "a specific journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796) (10 k only link). The problem with these questions is", "It may keep some askers from asking in the first place or help", "first place or help them to focus their question on what is not", "each other but could all be duplicates of a non-existing master question. **I", "This question and answer shall be a community wiki and cover: * What", "long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734) or are just very worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734). We also get some questions where a", "works and do not understand some step in the editiorial process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734), think some", "some step in the editiorial process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734), think some step takes too long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734) or", "as the above, which does not only avoid us dealing with such questions", "step takes too long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734) or are just very worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734). We also get some", "does not only avoid us dealing with such questions but also helps the", "individual steps, if they can be given at all? How do they roughly", "As different journals or editorial systems use different status messages, and review times", "them to focus their question on what is not covered by the canonical", "vary greatly across fields, this leads to questions that aren’t exactly duplicates of", "a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or opposition", "different editiorial systems? * What are the typical durations of individual steps, if", "worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734). We also get some questions where a step in the editorial process", "only link). The problem with these questions is that we can answer most", "editorial systems use different status messages, and review times vary greatly across fields,", "ridiculously long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734). (e.g., a month for initial quality check) or questions asking for", "of each other but could all be duplicates of a non-existing master question.", "wiki and cover: * What is the typical workflow of a journal? *", "on what is not covered by the canonical question. This question and answer", "not understand some step in the editiorial process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734), think some step takes too", "the typical durations of individual steps, if they can be given at all?", "create such a canonical question.** We may use it as a duplicate for", "status message probably means that [the editor has to evaluate the reviews].* As", "may use it as a duplicate for questions such as the above, which", "get some questions where a step in the editorial process took ridiculously long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734).", "given at all? How do they roughly depend on the field? --- This", "questions from people who are not aware how a journal works and do", "outrageously long.* * *The status message probably means that [the editor has to", "field? --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can", "get questions from people who are not aware how a journal works and", "publisher and journal, that’s normal / outrageously long.* * *The status message probably", "non-existing master question. **I here propose to create such a canonical question.** We", "community wiki and cover: * What is the typical workflow of a journal?", "questions such as the above, which does not only avoid us dealing with", "keep some askers from asking in the first place or help them to", "place or help them to focus their question on what is not covered", "of a non-existing master question. **I here propose to create such a canonical", "is not covered by the canonical question. This question and answer shall be", "* *Depending on the field, publisher and journal, that’s normal / outrageously long.*", "How do they roughly depend on the field? --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request", "or help them to focus their question on what is not covered by", "a duplicate for questions such as the above, which does not only avoid", "may keep some askers from asking in the first place or help them", "questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or opposition by voting on", "step in the editorial process took ridiculously long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734). (e.g., a month for initial", "aren’t exactly duplicates of each other but could all be duplicates of a", "[the editor has to evaluate the reviews].* As different journals or editorial systems", "the typical workflow of a journal? * How are the individual steps of", "exactly duplicates of each other but could all be duplicates of a non-existing", "link). The problem with these questions is that we can answer most of", "some step takes too long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734) or are just very worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734). We also get", "duplicates of each other but could all be duplicates of a non-existing master", "the following: * *We cannot possibly predict the editorial decision.* * *Depending on", "not only avoid us dealing with such questions but also helps the asker.", "--- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate", "on the field, publisher and journal, that’s normal / outrageously long.* * *The", "workflow named in different editiorial systems? * What are the typical durations of", "we can answer most of them only by reiterating one of the following:", "people who are not aware how a journal works and do not understand", "one of the following: * *We cannot possibly predict the editorial decision.* *", "which does not only avoid us dealing with such questions but also helps", "the canonical question. This question and answer shall be a community wiki and", "on the field? --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e.,", "often get questions from people who are not aware how a journal works", "* *We cannot possibly predict the editorial decision.* * *Depending on the field,", "a step in the editorial process took ridiculously long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734). (e.g., a month for", "step for a specific journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796) (10 k only link). The problem with these", "long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734). (e.g., a month for initial quality check) or questions asking for expected", "questions that aren’t exactly duplicates of each other but could all be duplicates", "How are the individual steps of this workflow named in different editiorial systems?", "in the first place or help them to focus their question on what", "step in the editiorial process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734), think some step takes too long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734) or are", "all be duplicates of a non-existing master question. **I here propose to create", "\"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or opposition by voting", "quality check) or questions asking for expected times for each step for a", "and answer shall be a community wiki and cover: * What is the", "or are just very worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734). We also get some questions where a step", "expected times for each step for a specific journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796) (10 k only link).", "that aren’t exactly duplicates of each other but could all be duplicates of", "them only by reiterating one of the following: * *We cannot possibly predict", "durations of individual steps, if they can be given at all? How do", "/ outrageously long.* * *The status message probably means that [the editor has", "but also helps the asker. It may keep some askers from asking in", "they can be given at all? How do they roughly depend on the", "by the canonical question. This question and answer shall be a community wiki", "following: * *We cannot possibly predict the editorial decision.* * *Depending on the", "field, publisher and journal, that’s normal / outrageously long.* * *The status message", "editor has to evaluate the reviews].* As different journals or editorial systems use", "are the individual steps of this workflow named in different editiorial systems? *", "We often get questions from people who are not aware how a journal", "can answer most of them only by reiterating one of the following: *", "is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or", "probably means that [the editor has to evaluate the reviews].* As different journals", "*We cannot possibly predict the editorial decision.* * *Depending on the field, publisher", "they roughly depend on the field? --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions", "times vary greatly across fields, this leads to questions that aren’t exactly duplicates", "here propose to create such a canonical question.** We may use it as", "with such questions but also helps the asker. It may keep some askers", "process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734), think some step takes too long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734) or are just very worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734). We", "journal, that’s normal / outrageously long.* * *The status message probably means that", "and do not understand some step in the editiorial process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734), think some step", "normal / outrageously long.* * *The status message probably means that [the editor", "different journals or editorial systems use different status messages, and review times vary", "of them only by reiterating one of the following: * *We cannot possibly", "editiorial process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734), think some step takes too long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734) or are just very worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734).", "'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or opposition by voting on the question.", "editorial process took ridiculously long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734). (e.g., a month for initial quality check) or", "month for initial quality check) or questions asking for expected times for each", "only by reiterating one of the following: * *We cannot possibly predict the", "*The status message probably means that [the editor has to evaluate the reviews].*", "are not aware how a journal works and do not understand some step", "such as the above, which does not only avoid us dealing with such", "for initial quality check) or questions asking for expected times for each step", "and review times vary greatly across fields, this leads to questions that aren’t", "steps of this workflow named in different editiorial systems? * What are the", "[feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you can indicate approval or opposition by", "very worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734). We also get some questions where a step in the editorial", "question on what is not covered by the canonical question. This question and", "(10 k only link). The problem with these questions is that we can", "askers from asking in the first place or help them to focus their", "workflow of a journal? * How are the individual steps of this workflow", "* What is the typical workflow of a journal? * How are the", "help them to focus their question on what is not covered by the", "the field, publisher and journal, that’s normal / outrageously long.* * *The status", "depend on the field? --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"),", "are the typical durations of individual steps, if they can be given at", "We also get some questions where a step in the editorial process took", "some askers from asking in the first place or help them to focus", "from people who are not aware how a journal works and do not", "initial quality check) or questions asking for expected times for each step for", "it as a duplicate for questions such as the above, which does not", "for each step for a specific journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796) (10 k only link). The problem", "questions is that we can answer most of them only by reiterating one", "specific journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796) (10 k only link). The problem with these questions is that", "reviews].* As different journals or editorial systems use different status messages, and review", "propose to create such a canonical question.** We may use it as a", "for questions such as the above, which does not only avoid us dealing", "different status messages, and review times vary greatly across fields, this leads to", "their question on what is not covered by the canonical question. This question", "for expected times for each step for a specific journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796) (10 k only", "that’s normal / outrageously long.* * *The status message probably means that [the", "who are not aware how a journal works and do not understand some", "in the editorial process took ridiculously long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734). (e.g., a month for initial quality", "be duplicates of a non-existing master question. **I here propose to create such", "a non-existing master question. **I here propose to create such a canonical question.**", "to questions that aren’t exactly duplicates of each other but could all be", "and journal, that’s normal / outrageously long.* * *The status message probably means", "journals or editorial systems use different status messages, and review times vary greatly", "the editorial process took ridiculously long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734). (e.g., a month for initial quality check)", "**I here propose to create such a canonical question.** We may use it", "the field? --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged 'feature-request'\"), i.e., you", "* How are the individual steps of this workflow named in different editiorial", "the first place or help them to focus their question on what is", "*Depending on the field, publisher and journal, that’s normal / outrageously long.* *", "a community wiki and cover: * What is the typical workflow of a", "check) or questions asking for expected times for each step for a specific", "if they can be given at all? How do they roughly depend on", "journal works and do not understand some step in the editiorial process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734), think", "aware how a journal works and do not understand some step in the", "the reviews].* As different journals or editorial systems use different status messages, and", "named in different editiorial systems? * What are the typical durations of individual", "or editorial systems use different status messages, and review times vary greatly across", "k only link). The problem with these questions is that we can answer", "status messages, and review times vary greatly across fields, this leads to questions", "question.** We may use it as a duplicate for questions such as the", "predict the editorial decision.* * *Depending on the field, publisher and journal, that’s", "fields, this leads to questions that aren’t exactly duplicates of each other but", "the individual steps of this workflow named in different editiorial systems? * What", "(e.g., a month for initial quality check) or questions asking for expected times", "such questions but also helps the asker. It may keep some askers from", "a journal? * How are the individual steps of this workflow named in", "some questions where a step in the editorial process took ridiculously long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734). (e.g.,", "the editorial decision.* * *Depending on the field, publisher and journal, that’s normal", "helps the asker. It may keep some askers from asking in the first", "took ridiculously long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734). (e.g., a month for initial quality check) or questions asking", "typical workflow of a journal? * How are the individual steps of this", "of a journal? * How are the individual steps of this workflow named", "are just very worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734). We also get some questions where a step in", "these questions is that we can answer most of them only by reiterating", "what is not covered by the canonical question. This question and answer shall", "by reiterating one of the following: * *We cannot possibly predict the editorial", "in the editiorial process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734), think some step takes too long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734) or are just", "above, which does not only avoid us dealing with such questions but also", "this leads to questions that aren’t exactly duplicates of each other but could", "greatly across fields, this leads to questions that aren’t exactly duplicates of each", "think some step takes too long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734) or are just very worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734). We also", "asker. It may keep some askers from asking in the first place or", "just very worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734). We also get some questions where a step in the", "dealing with such questions but also helps the asker. It may keep some", "question and answer shall be a community wiki and cover: * What is", "questions asking for expected times for each step for a specific journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796) (10", "or questions asking for expected times for each step for a specific journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796)", "question. This question and answer shall be a community wiki and cover: *", "typical durations of individual steps, if they can be given at all? How", "review times vary greatly across fields, this leads to questions that aren’t exactly", "question. **I here propose to create such a canonical question.** We may use", "in different editiorial systems? * What are the typical durations of individual steps,", "of the following: * *We cannot possibly predict the editorial decision.* * *Depending", "asking for expected times for each step for a specific journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796) (10 k", "to evaluate the reviews].* As different journals or editorial systems use different status", "possibly predict the editorial decision.* * *Depending on the field, publisher and journal,", "takes too long[²](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/23655/7734) or are just very worried[³](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/45375/7734). We also get some questions", "not covered by the canonical question. This question and answer shall be a", "steps, if they can be given at all? How do they roughly depend", "The problem with these questions is that we can answer most of them", "canonical question.** We may use it as a duplicate for questions such as", "focus their question on what is not covered by the canonical question. This", "We may use it as a duplicate for questions such as the above,", "not aware how a journal works and do not understand some step in", "that we can answer most of them only by reiterating one of the", "each step for a specific journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796) (10 k only link). The problem with", "evaluate the reviews].* As different journals or editorial systems use different status messages,", "a journal works and do not understand some step in the editiorial process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734),", "such a canonical question.** We may use it as a duplicate for questions", "times for each step for a specific journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796) (10 k only link). The", "most of them only by reiterating one of the following: * *We cannot", "is that we can answer most of them only by reiterating one of", "other but could all be duplicates of a non-existing master question. **I here", "but could all be duplicates of a non-existing master question. **I here propose", "a month for initial quality check) or questions asking for expected times for", "What is the typical workflow of a journal? * How are the individual", "leads to questions that aren’t exactly duplicates of each other but could all", "editiorial systems? * What are the typical durations of individual steps, if they", "What are the typical durations of individual steps, if they can be given", "messages, and review times vary greatly across fields, this leads to questions that", "journal? * How are the individual steps of this workflow named in different", "use it as a duplicate for questions such as the above, which does", "from asking in the first place or help them to focus their question", "canonical question. This question and answer shall be a community wiki and cover:", "cannot possibly predict the editorial decision.* * *Depending on the field, publisher and", "process took ridiculously long[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12497/7734). (e.g., a month for initial quality check) or questions", "at all? How do they roughly depend on the field? --- This is", "as a duplicate for questions such as the above, which does not only", "covered by the canonical question. This question and answer shall be a community", "of this workflow named in different editiorial systems? * What are the typical", "journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796) (10 k only link). The problem with these questions is that we", "this workflow named in different editiorial systems? * What are the typical durations", "use different status messages, and review times vary greatly across fields, this leads", "answer shall be a community wiki and cover: * What is the typical", "* What are the typical durations of individual steps, if they can be", "duplicate for questions such as the above, which does not only avoid us", "be given at all? How do they roughly depend on the field? ---", "roughly depend on the field? --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show questions tagged", "and cover: * What is the typical workflow of a journal? * How", "* *The status message probably means that [the editor has to evaluate the", "decision.* * *Depending on the field, publisher and journal, that’s normal / outrageously", "with these questions is that we can answer most of them only by", "to create such a canonical question.** We may use it as a duplicate", "only avoid us dealing with such questions but also helps the asker. It", "also helps the asker. It may keep some askers from asking in the", "editorial decision.* * *Depending on the field, publisher and journal, that’s normal /", "could all be duplicates of a non-existing master question. **I here propose to", "cover: * What is the typical workflow of a journal? * How are", "all? How do they roughly depend on the field? --- This is a", "has to evaluate the reviews].* As different journals or editorial systems use different", "problem with these questions is that we can answer most of them only", "avoid us dealing with such questions but also helps the asker. It may", "do they roughly depend on the field? --- This is a [feature-request](/questions/tagged/feature-request \"show", "do not understand some step in the editiorial process[¹](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/48446/7734), think some step takes", "of individual steps, if they can be given at all? How do they", "can be given at all? How do they roughly depend on the field?", "for a specific journal[⁴](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51796) (10 k only link). The problem with these questions", "duplicates of a non-existing master question. **I here propose to create such a", "reiterating one of the following: * *We cannot possibly predict the editorial decision.*" ]
[ "have privileges to post on the meta forum. If there's a better place", "to post on the meta forum. If there's a better place to post", "post on the meta forum. If there's a better place to post this,", "on the meta forum. If there's a better place to post this, it'd", "I don't have privileges to post on the meta forum. If there's a", "meta forum. If there's a better place to post this, it'd be really", "Title says it all, and I don't have privileges to post on the", "If there's a better place to post this, it'd be really helpful to", "don't have privileges to post on the meta forum. If there's a better", "says it all, and I don't have privileges to post on the meta", "the meta forum. If there's a better place to post this, it'd be", "there's a better place to post this, it'd be really helpful to hear", "a better place to post this, it'd be really helpful to hear about.", "and I don't have privileges to post on the meta forum. If there's", "forum. If there's a better place to post this, it'd be really helpful", "all, and I don't have privileges to post on the meta forum. If", "it all, and I don't have privileges to post on the meta forum.", "privileges to post on the meta forum. If there's a better place to" ]
[ "and simply unfamiliar with our community (this response is basically my own first", "knew to put my first response as a [comment on another answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/55315/22733) instead).", "No!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > Obviously, this is a poor answer and", "as a [comment on another answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/55315/22733) instead). Can this please be moved to", "moderators, however, acted instead by only rapidly deleting the answer. I think that", "simply unfamiliar with our community (this response is basically my own first response---I've", "only rapidly deleting the answer. I think that this is a problem because", "is very discouraging for a new answerer, particularly one who might be a", "\"unethical restaurant research\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55314/22733), a new user made a low-quality answer consisting entirely", "it is very discouraging for a new answerer, particularly one who might be", "One of the moderators, however, acted instead by only rapidly deleting the answer.", "unfamiliar with our community (this response is basically my own first response---I've just", "put my first response as a [comment on another answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/55315/22733) instead). Can this", "[comment on another answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/55315/22733) instead). Can this please be moved to a comment", "is a poor answer and needs to be either improved or changed into", "might be a genuine expert and simply unfamiliar with our community (this response", "No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > Obviously, this is a poor answer and needs", "to be either improved or changed into a comment, and it received notes", "comment, and it received notes (and presumably flags) to this effect. One of", "of: > > No!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > Obviously, this is a", "new answerer, particularly one who might be a genuine expert and simply unfamiliar", "effect. One of the moderators, however, acted instead by only rapidly deleting the", "needs to be either improved or changed into a comment, and it received", "been around long enough that I knew to put my first response as", "around long enough that I knew to put my first response as a", "the moderators, however, acted instead by only rapidly deleting the answer. I think", "my own first response---I've just been around long enough that I knew to", "answerer, particularly one who might be a genuine expert and simply unfamiliar with", "response is basically my own first response---I've just been around long enough that", "on another answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/55315/22733) instead). Can this please be moved to a comment instead?", "basically my own first response---I've just been around long enough that I knew", "long enough that I knew to put my first response as a [comment", "a low-quality answer consisting entirely of: > > No!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > >", "response---I've just been around long enough that I knew to put my first", "entirely of: > > No!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > Obviously, this is", "by only rapidly deleting the answer. I think that this is a problem", "first response as a [comment on another answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/55315/22733) instead). Can this please be", "notes (and presumably flags) to this effect. One of the moderators, however, acted", "is basically my own first response---I've just been around long enough that I", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55314/22733), a new user made a low-quality answer consisting entirely of: > >", "improved or changed into a comment, and it received notes (and presumably flags)", "[the \"unethical restaurant research\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55314/22733), a new user made a low-quality answer consisting", "into a comment, and it received notes (and presumably flags) to this effect.", "my first response as a [comment on another answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/55315/22733) instead). Can this please", "because it is very discouraging for a new answerer, particularly one who might", "flags) to this effect. One of the moderators, however, acted instead by only", "> > Obviously, this is a poor answer and needs to be either", "acted instead by only rapidly deleting the answer. I think that this is", "rapidly deleting the answer. I think that this is a problem because it", "No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > Obviously, this is a poor answer and needs to", "very discouraging for a new answerer, particularly one who might be a genuine", "(this response is basically my own first response---I've just been around long enough", "that I knew to put my first response as a [comment on another", "a new user made a low-quality answer consisting entirely of: > > No!!!!!!", "new user made a low-quality answer consisting entirely of: > > No!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!", "instead by only rapidly deleting the answer. I think that this is a", "be either improved or changed into a comment, and it received notes (and", "research\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55314/22733), a new user made a low-quality answer consisting entirely of: >", "of the moderators, however, acted instead by only rapidly deleting the answer. I", "changed into a comment, and it received notes (and presumably flags) to this", "problem because it is very discouraging for a new answerer, particularly one who", "to put my first response as a [comment on another answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/55315/22733) instead). Can", "for a new answerer, particularly one who might be a genuine expert and", "I think that this is a problem because it is very discouraging for", "> Obviously, this is a poor answer and needs to be either improved", "one who might be a genuine expert and simply unfamiliar with our community", "made a low-quality answer consisting entirely of: > > No!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >", "answer. I think that this is a problem because it is very discouraging", "our community (this response is basically my own first response---I've just been around", "however, acted instead by only rapidly deleting the answer. I think that this", "(and presumably flags) to this effect. One of the moderators, however, acted instead", "who might be a genuine expert and simply unfamiliar with our community (this", "restaurant research\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55314/22733), a new user made a low-quality answer consisting entirely of:", "the answer. I think that this is a problem because it is very", "think that this is a problem because it is very discouraging for a", "low-quality answer consisting entirely of: > > No!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > >", "a genuine expert and simply unfamiliar with our community (this response is basically", "> No!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > Obviously, this is a poor answer", "presumably flags) to this effect. One of the moderators, however, acted instead by", "a new answerer, particularly one who might be a genuine expert and simply", "genuine expert and simply unfamiliar with our community (this response is basically my", "this is a problem because it is very discouraging for a new answerer,", "a problem because it is very discouraging for a new answerer, particularly one", "a [comment on another answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/55315/22733) instead). Can this please be moved to a", "that this is a problem because it is very discouraging for a new", "a poor answer and needs to be either improved or changed into a", "answer and needs to be either improved or changed into a comment, and", "expert and simply unfamiliar with our community (this response is basically my own", "enough that I knew to put my first response as a [comment on", "this effect. One of the moderators, however, acted instead by only rapidly deleting", "or changed into a comment, and it received notes (and presumably flags) to", "user made a low-quality answer consisting entirely of: > > No!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!", "discouraging for a new answerer, particularly one who might be a genuine expert", "received notes (and presumably flags) to this effect. One of the moderators, however,", "a comment, and it received notes (and presumably flags) to this effect. One", "consisting entirely of: > > No!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > Obviously, this", "be a genuine expert and simply unfamiliar with our community (this response is", "community (this response is basically my own first response---I've just been around long", "just been around long enough that I knew to put my first response", "to this effect. One of the moderators, however, acted instead by only rapidly", "I knew to put my first response as a [comment on another answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/55315/22733)", "On [the \"unethical restaurant research\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55314/22733), a new user made a low-quality answer", "answer consisting entirely of: > > No!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > Obviously,", "and needs to be either improved or changed into a comment, and it", "either improved or changed into a comment, and it received notes (and presumably", "it received notes (and presumably flags) to this effect. One of the moderators,", "is a problem because it is very discouraging for a new answerer, particularly", "this is a poor answer and needs to be either improved or changed", "first response---I've just been around long enough that I knew to put my", "Obviously, this is a poor answer and needs to be either improved or", "deleting the answer. I think that this is a problem because it is", "own first response---I've just been around long enough that I knew to put", "response as a [comment on another answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/55315/22733) instead). Can this please be moved", "particularly one who might be a genuine expert and simply unfamiliar with our", "poor answer and needs to be either improved or changed into a comment,", "and it received notes (and presumably flags) to this effect. One of the", "> > > Obviously, this is a poor answer and needs to be", "with our community (this response is basically my own first response---I've just been", "> > No!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > Obviously, this is a poor" ]
[ "are most of the top universities American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825) What might explain these attitudes among", "example, see some of the comments left under the recent posting, [Why are", "basic envy of the U.S. educational system? Sour grapes because they applied but", "to have non-polemical conversations? Plain old ignorance? Or is it actually considered to", "the comments left under the recent posting, [Why are most of the top", "inability to have non-polemical conversations? Plain old ignorance? Or is it actually considered", "to a graduate program at a U.S.-based university, possibly years and years ago?", "American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825) What might explain these attitudes among otherwise well-educated folk? Is it just", "they applied but didn't get admitted to a graduate program at a U.S.-based", "under the recent posting, [Why are most of the top universities American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825) What", "most of the top universities American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825) What might explain these attitudes among otherwise", "U.S. educational system? Sour grapes because they applied but didn't get admitted to", "might explain these attitudes among otherwise well-educated folk? Is it just basic envy", "by the willingness of some contributors to this site to express, either consciously", "unconsciously, views about the U.S. higher educational system that are little more than", "than thinly vailed anti-American rants. For a specific example, see some of the", "possibly years and years ago? A general inability to have non-polemical conversations? Plain", "some of the comments left under the recent posting, [Why are most of", "higher educational system that are little more than thinly vailed anti-American rants. For", "the recent posting, [Why are most of the top universities American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825) What might", "consciously or unconsciously, views about the U.S. higher educational system that are little", "didn't get admitted to a graduate program at a U.S.-based university, possibly years", "educational system that are little more than thinly vailed anti-American rants. For a", "Plain old ignorance? Or is it actually considered to be good form to", "or unconsciously, views about the U.S. higher educational system that are little more", "thinly vailed anti-American rants. For a specific example, see some of the comments", "because they applied but didn't get admitted to a graduate program at a", "Or is it actually considered to be good form to rail against anything", "posting, [Why are most of the top universities American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825) What might explain these", "of some contributors to this site to express, either consciously or unconsciously, views", "good form to rail against anything and everything in and from the U.S.?", "anti-American rants. For a specific example, see some of the comments left under", "Sour grapes because they applied but didn't get admitted to a graduate program", "comments left under the recent posting, [Why are most of the top universities", "applied but didn't get admitted to a graduate program at a U.S.-based university,", "these attitudes among otherwise well-educated folk? Is it just basic envy of the", "willingness of some contributors to this site to express, either consciously or unconsciously,", "I'm struck by the willingness of some contributors to this site to express,", "educational system? Sour grapes because they applied but didn't get admitted to a", "but didn't get admitted to a graduate program at a U.S.-based university, possibly", "general inability to have non-polemical conversations? Plain old ignorance? Or is it actually", "old ignorance? Or is it actually considered to be good form to rail", "considered to be good form to rail against anything and everything in and", "just basic envy of the U.S. educational system? Sour grapes because they applied", "universities American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825) What might explain these attitudes among otherwise well-educated folk? Is it", "vailed anti-American rants. For a specific example, see some of the comments left", "folk? Is it just basic envy of the U.S. educational system? Sour grapes", "grapes because they applied but didn't get admitted to a graduate program at", "the U.S. educational system? Sour grapes because they applied but didn't get admitted", "either consciously or unconsciously, views about the U.S. higher educational system that are", "system that are little more than thinly vailed anti-American rants. For a specific", "recent posting, [Why are most of the top universities American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825) What might explain", "be good form to rail against anything and everything in and from the", "rants. For a specific example, see some of the comments left under the", "a graduate program at a U.S.-based university, possibly years and years ago? A", "express, either consciously or unconsciously, views about the U.S. higher educational system that", "is it actually considered to be good form to rail against anything and", "among otherwise well-educated folk? Is it just basic envy of the U.S. educational", "ignorance? Or is it actually considered to be good form to rail against", "[Why are most of the top universities American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825) What might explain these attitudes", "non-polemical conversations? Plain old ignorance? Or is it actually considered to be good", "a U.S.-based university, possibly years and years ago? A general inability to have", "Is it just basic envy of the U.S. educational system? Sour grapes because", "of the top universities American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825) What might explain these attitudes among otherwise well-educated", "top universities American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825) What might explain these attitudes among otherwise well-educated folk? Is", "views about the U.S. higher educational system that are little more than thinly", "What might explain these attitudes among otherwise well-educated folk? Is it just basic", "a specific example, see some of the comments left under the recent posting,", "and years ago? A general inability to have non-polemical conversations? Plain old ignorance?", "of the comments left under the recent posting, [Why are most of the", "system? Sour grapes because they applied but didn't get admitted to a graduate", "some contributors to this site to express, either consciously or unconsciously, views about", "are little more than thinly vailed anti-American rants. For a specific example, see", "little more than thinly vailed anti-American rants. For a specific example, see some", "more than thinly vailed anti-American rants. For a specific example, see some of", "left under the recent posting, [Why are most of the top universities American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825)", "specific example, see some of the comments left under the recent posting, [Why", "conversations? Plain old ignorance? Or is it actually considered to be good form", "the top universities American?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55792/20825) What might explain these attitudes among otherwise well-educated folk?", "attitudes among otherwise well-educated folk? Is it just basic envy of the U.S.", "admitted to a graduate program at a U.S.-based university, possibly years and years", "this site to express, either consciously or unconsciously, views about the U.S. higher", "For a specific example, see some of the comments left under the recent", "years ago? A general inability to have non-polemical conversations? Plain old ignorance? Or", "A general inability to have non-polemical conversations? Plain old ignorance? Or is it", "to this site to express, either consciously or unconsciously, views about the U.S.", "about the U.S. higher educational system that are little more than thinly vailed", "contributors to this site to express, either consciously or unconsciously, views about the", "have non-polemical conversations? Plain old ignorance? Or is it actually considered to be", "the U.S. higher educational system that are little more than thinly vailed anti-American", "struck by the willingness of some contributors to this site to express, either", "U.S.-based university, possibly years and years ago? A general inability to have non-polemical", "at a U.S.-based university, possibly years and years ago? A general inability to", "well-educated folk? Is it just basic envy of the U.S. educational system? Sour", "the willingness of some contributors to this site to express, either consciously or", "actually considered to be good form to rail against anything and everything in", "of the U.S. educational system? Sour grapes because they applied but didn't get", "get admitted to a graduate program at a U.S.-based university, possibly years and", "see some of the comments left under the recent posting, [Why are most", "ago? A general inability to have non-polemical conversations? Plain old ignorance? Or is", "years and years ago? A general inability to have non-polemical conversations? Plain old", "explain these attitudes among otherwise well-educated folk? Is it just basic envy of", "it just basic envy of the U.S. educational system? Sour grapes because they", "otherwise well-educated folk? Is it just basic envy of the U.S. educational system?", "university, possibly years and years ago? A general inability to have non-polemical conversations?", "to be good form to rail against anything and everything in and from", "to express, either consciously or unconsciously, views about the U.S. higher educational system", "it actually considered to be good form to rail against anything and everything", "U.S. higher educational system that are little more than thinly vailed anti-American rants.", "program at a U.S.-based university, possibly years and years ago? A general inability", "site to express, either consciously or unconsciously, views about the U.S. higher educational", "graduate program at a U.S.-based university, possibly years and years ago? A general", "envy of the U.S. educational system? Sour grapes because they applied but didn't", "that are little more than thinly vailed anti-American rants. For a specific example," ]
[ "i.e. question that fit on two sites and may receive good answers from", "should be open I think that only one of these questions should be", "aeismael asking to keep the question open on Academia.SE and here on Academia.SE", "good ways to keep students coming to lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures) has been posted here at", "and gave the link to the respective other site. I guessed that mods", "would take care of this issue. Now what happened is that on Matheducators.SE", "on Matheducators.SE there is a comment by aeismael asking to keep the question", "commented on both questions and gave the link to the respective other site.", "questions and gave the link to the respective other site. I guessed that", "Matheducators.SE question is deleted. While I have no particular feeling where the question", "open as long as they are asking precisely the same thing. Keeping both", "of this issue. Now what happened is that on Matheducators.SE there is a", "care of this issue. Now what happened is that on Matheducators.SE there is", "by aeismael asking to keep the question open on Academia.SE and here on", "has been posted here at Academia.SE and simultaneously over at [Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures). When I", "I have no particular feeling where the question should be open I think", "on Academia.SE my comment with the link to the Matheducators.SE question is deleted.", "inferior collection of relevant answers on both sides. My question is: Is the", "other site. I guessed that mods or high-rep users would take care of", "Keeping both questions open results in exactly the things that crossposts do: Duplicate", "guessed that mods or high-rep users would take care of this issue. Now", "the respective other site. I guessed that mods or high-rep users would take", "on different sites and also an inferior collection of relevant answers on both", "on both sides. My question is: Is the current status OK for the", "here and on Matheducators.SE? How should questions like this, i.e. question that fit", "they are asking precisely the same thing. Keeping both questions open results in", "link to the respective other site. I guessed that mods or high-rep users", "Now what happened is that on Matheducators.SE there is a comment by aeismael", "When I noticed this I commented on both questions and gave the link", "should questions like this, i.e. question that fit on two sites and may", "keep the question open on Academia.SE and here on Academia.SE my comment with", "for the mods here and on Matheducators.SE? How should questions like this, i.e.", "the same thing. Keeping both questions open results in exactly the things that", "do: Duplicate work on different sites and also an inferior collection of relevant", "Academia.SE and here on Academia.SE my comment with the link to the Matheducators.SE", "and also an inferior collection of relevant answers on both sides. My question", "Academia.SE my comment with the link to the Matheducators.SE question is deleted. While", "happened is that on Matheducators.SE there is a comment by aeismael asking to", "I guessed that mods or high-rep users would take care of this issue.", "same thing. Keeping both questions open results in exactly the things that crossposts", "both questions open results in exactly the things that crossposts do: Duplicate work", "question open on Academia.SE and here on Academia.SE my comment with the link", "long as they are asking precisely the same thing. Keeping both questions open", "sides. My question is: Is the current status OK for the mods here", "on two sites and may receive good answers from both communities, be handled?", "where the question should be open I think that only one of these", "at Academia.SE and simultaneously over at [Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures). When I noticed this I commented", "on Academia.SE and here on Academia.SE my comment with the link to the", "exactly the things that crossposts do: Duplicate work on different sites and also", "think that only one of these questions should be open as long as", "answers on both sides. My question is: Is the current status OK for", "Duplicate work on different sites and also an inferior collection of relevant answers", "the current status OK for the mods here and on Matheducators.SE? How should", "lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures) has been posted here at Academia.SE and simultaneously over at [Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures). When", "thing. Keeping both questions open results in exactly the things that crossposts do:", "question that fit on two sites and may receive good answers from both", "or high-rep users would take care of this issue. Now what happened is", "How should questions like this, i.e. question that fit on two sites and", "coming to lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures) has been posted here at Academia.SE and simultaneously over at", "question is: Is the current status OK for the mods here and on", "that only one of these questions should be open as long as they", "are some good ways to keep students coming to lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures) has been posted", "this issue. Now what happened is that on Matheducators.SE there is a comment", "Matheducators.SE? How should questions like this, i.e. question that fit on two sites", "that fit on two sites and may receive good answers from both communities,", "The question [\"What are some good ways to keep students coming to lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures)", "mods here and on Matheducators.SE? How should questions like this, i.e. question that", "my comment with the link to the Matheducators.SE question is deleted. While I", "of these questions should be open as long as they are asking precisely", "is: Is the current status OK for the mods here and on Matheducators.SE?", "the things that crossposts do: Duplicate work on different sites and also an", "to the Matheducators.SE question is deleted. While I have no particular feeling where", "issue. Now what happened is that on Matheducators.SE there is a comment by", "on both questions and gave the link to the respective other site. I", "relevant answers on both sides. My question is: Is the current status OK", "is a comment by aeismael asking to keep the question open on Academia.SE", "crossposts do: Duplicate work on different sites and also an inferior collection of", "feeling where the question should be open I think that only one of", "[Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures). When I noticed this I commented on both questions and gave the", "asking to keep the question open on Academia.SE and here on Academia.SE my", "be open I think that only one of these questions should be open", "here at Academia.SE and simultaneously over at [Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures). When I noticed this I", "should be open as long as they are asking precisely the same thing.", "both questions and gave the link to the respective other site. I guessed", "I commented on both questions and gave the link to the respective other", "status OK for the mods here and on Matheducators.SE? How should questions like", "comment with the link to the Matheducators.SE question is deleted. While I have", "there is a comment by aeismael asking to keep the question open on", "of relevant answers on both sides. My question is: Is the current status", "that mods or high-rep users would take care of this issue. Now what", "current status OK for the mods here and on Matheducators.SE? How should questions", "as long as they are asking precisely the same thing. Keeping both questions", "here on Academia.SE my comment with the link to the Matheducators.SE question is", "posted here at Academia.SE and simultaneously over at [Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures). When I noticed this", "that crossposts do: Duplicate work on different sites and also an inferior collection", "particular feeling where the question should be open I think that only one", "My question is: Is the current status OK for the mods here and", "some good ways to keep students coming to lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures) has been posted here", "Academia.SE and simultaneously over at [Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures). When I noticed this I commented on", "question [\"What are some good ways to keep students coming to lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures) has", "the Matheducators.SE question is deleted. While I have no particular feeling where the", "the mods here and on Matheducators.SE? How should questions like this, i.e. question", "be open as long as they are asking precisely the same thing. Keeping", "and on Matheducators.SE? How should questions like this, i.e. question that fit on", "questions should be open as long as they are asking precisely the same", "question is deleted. While I have no particular feeling where the question should", "one of these questions should be open as long as they are asking", "that on Matheducators.SE there is a comment by aeismael asking to keep the", "link to the Matheducators.SE question is deleted. While I have no particular feeling", "this, i.e. question that fit on two sites and may receive good answers", "results in exactly the things that crossposts do: Duplicate work on different sites", "open I think that only one of these questions should be open as", "comment by aeismael asking to keep the question open on Academia.SE and here", "precisely the same thing. Keeping both questions open results in exactly the things", "site. I guessed that mods or high-rep users would take care of this", "Is the current status OK for the mods here and on Matheducators.SE? How", "sites and also an inferior collection of relevant answers on both sides. My", "Matheducators.SE there is a comment by aeismael asking to keep the question open", "the question should be open I think that only one of these questions", "things that crossposts do: Duplicate work on different sites and also an inferior", "as they are asking precisely the same thing. Keeping both questions open results", "are asking precisely the same thing. Keeping both questions open results in exactly", "have no particular feeling where the question should be open I think that", "gave the link to the respective other site. I guessed that mods or", "work on different sites and also an inferior collection of relevant answers on", "I noticed this I commented on both questions and gave the link to", "questions open results in exactly the things that crossposts do: Duplicate work on", "noticed this I commented on both questions and gave the link to the", "high-rep users would take care of this issue. Now what happened is that", "take care of this issue. Now what happened is that on Matheducators.SE there", "is deleted. While I have no particular feeling where the question should be", "to keep students coming to lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures) has been posted here at Academia.SE and", "no particular feeling where the question should be open I think that only", "what happened is that on Matheducators.SE there is a comment by aeismael asking", "the link to the respective other site. I guessed that mods or high-rep", "like this, i.e. question that fit on two sites and may receive good", "been posted here at Academia.SE and simultaneously over at [Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures). When I noticed", "students coming to lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures) has been posted here at Academia.SE and simultaneously over", "over at [Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures). When I noticed this I commented on both questions and", "users would take care of this issue. Now what happened is that on", "both sides. My question is: Is the current status OK for the mods", "I think that only one of these questions should be open as long", "to lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures) has been posted here at Academia.SE and simultaneously over at [Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures).", "question should be open I think that only one of these questions should", "questions like this, i.e. question that fit on two sites and may receive", "in exactly the things that crossposts do: Duplicate work on different sites and", "to the respective other site. I guessed that mods or high-rep users would", "deleted. While I have no particular feeling where the question should be open", "only one of these questions should be open as long as they are", "also an inferior collection of relevant answers on both sides. My question is:", "is that on Matheducators.SE there is a comment by aeismael asking to keep", "[\"What are some good ways to keep students coming to lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures) has been", "a comment by aeismael asking to keep the question open on Academia.SE and", "OK for the mods here and on Matheducators.SE? How should questions like this,", "the question open on Academia.SE and here on Academia.SE my comment with the", "open results in exactly the things that crossposts do: Duplicate work on different", "an inferior collection of relevant answers on both sides. My question is: Is", "collection of relevant answers on both sides. My question is: Is the current", "these questions should be open as long as they are asking precisely the", "While I have no particular feeling where the question should be open I", "keep students coming to lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures) has been posted here at Academia.SE and simultaneously", "mods or high-rep users would take care of this issue. Now what happened", "asking precisely the same thing. Keeping both questions open results in exactly the", "fit on two sites and may receive good answers from both communities, be", "at [Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures). When I noticed this I commented on both questions and gave", "on Matheducators.SE? How should questions like this, i.e. question that fit on two", "different sites and also an inferior collection of relevant answers on both sides.", "the link to the Matheducators.SE question is deleted. While I have no particular", "open on Academia.SE and here on Academia.SE my comment with the link to", "this I commented on both questions and gave the link to the respective", "ways to keep students coming to lectures?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures) has been posted here at Academia.SE", "and simultaneously over at [Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures). When I noticed this I commented on both", "simultaneously over at [Matheducators.SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/9932/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures). When I noticed this I commented on both questions", "respective other site. I guessed that mods or high-rep users would take care", "and here on Academia.SE my comment with the link to the Matheducators.SE question", "to keep the question open on Academia.SE and here on Academia.SE my comment", "with the link to the Matheducators.SE question is deleted. While I have no" ]
[ "I think that's nonsense; there are thousands of people who go through the", "here over the past years, not the least by JeffE with his famous", "to this question strongly depends on individual factors such as a certain person’s", "[use of funds for sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams), nor have I had an overly [ambitious student", "for sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams), nor have I had an overly [ambitious student thinking highly of", "of him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein), and thankfully I have never had to [deal with sexual advances", "and thankfully I have never had to [deal with sexual advances from students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students).", "A [recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57676/how-to-deal-with-gpa-related-questions-in-standardized-job-application-forms-if) of mine was apparently put on-hold with the following motivation:", "students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students). Should I flag these questions off-topic because we cannot know the intricate", "due to being too specific, then I ask where do we draw the", "on-hold with the following motivation: > > \"The answer to this question strongly", "myself, these [53 pages full of hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA) certainly say so.. So if the", "the least by JeffE with his famous example from his own career. So", "the line? I, for instance, don't feel like I'd [ask dumb questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) in", "[ask dumb questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) in seminars/conferences, study/work in an American university where I would", "his own career. So the two main components of the question are clearly", "I did and the companies I was referring to are multinational giants that", "relevant to many others than myself, these [53 pages full of hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA) certainly", "a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your work or your personal", "ask where do we draw the line? I, for instance, don't feel like", "has been up and debated my many here over the past years, not", "have never had to [deal with sexual advances from students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students). Should I flag", "of your work or your personal values. Thus only someone familiar can answer", "more info.)\" – Nate Eldredge, Wrzlprmft, gman, Fomite, scaaahu > > > Quite", "by JeffE with his famous example from his own career. So the two", "had an overly [ambitious student thinking highly of him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein), and thankfully I have", "your personal values. Thus only someone familiar can answer this question and it", "questions off-topic because we cannot know the intricate details of the situation the", "answer to this question strongly depends on individual factors such as a certain", "I'd [ask dumb questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) in seminars/conferences, study/work in an American university where I", "there are thousands of people who go through the same graduate education as", "others. (See this discussion for more info.)\" – Nate Eldredge, Wrzlprmft, gman, Fomite,", "of people who go through the same graduate education as I did and", "many others than myself, these [53 pages full of hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA) certainly say so..", "on individual factors such as a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations,", "\"The answer to this question strongly depends on individual factors such as a", "hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA) certainly say so.. So if the reason my question is off-topic due", "people asking these questions? Because surely the answer depends on each and every", "it cannot be generalised to apply to others. (See this discussion for more", "Wrzlprmft, gman, Fomite, scaaahu > > > Quite frankly I think that's nonsense;", "each and every specific case which may not apply to the general audience?", "a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your", "familiar can answer this question and it cannot be generalised to apply to", "surely the answer depends on each and every specific case which may not", "apparently put on-hold with the following motivation: > > \"The answer to this", "> > > Quite frankly I think that's nonsense; there are thousands of", "nonsense; there are thousands of people who go through the same graduate education", "thousands (if not more) globally. The importance of GPA in application processes has", "would question the [use of funds for sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams), nor have I had an", "past years, not the least by JeffE with his famous example from his", "these questions off-topic because we cannot know the intricate details of the situation", "(if not more) globally. The importance of GPA in application processes has been", "in the tens of thousands (if not more) globally. The importance of GPA", "education as I did and the companies I was referring to are multinational", "exact contents of your work or your personal values. Thus only someone familiar", "I flag these questions off-topic because we cannot know the intricate details of", "in application processes has been up and debated my many here over the", "preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your work or your", "these questions? Because surely the answer depends on each and every specific case", "processes has been up and debated my many here over the past years,", "people who go through the same graduate education as I did and the", "factors such as a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact", "of mine was apparently put on-hold with the following motivation: > > \"The", "as I did and the companies I was referring to are multinational giants", "questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) in seminars/conferences, study/work in an American university where I would question the", "[ambitious student thinking highly of him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein), and thankfully I have never had to", "full of hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA) certainly say so.. So if the reason my question is", "the reason my question is off-topic due to being too specific, then I", "companies I was referring to are multinational giants that employ in the tens", "because we cannot know the intricate details of the situation the people asking", "in seminars/conferences, study/work in an American university where I would question the [use", "discussion for more info.)\" – Nate Eldredge, Wrzlprmft, gman, Fomite, scaaahu > >", "details of the situation the people asking these questions? Because surely the answer", "least by JeffE with his famous example from his own career. So the", "dumb questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) in seminars/conferences, study/work in an American university where I would question", "for more info.)\" – Nate Eldredge, Wrzlprmft, gman, Fomite, scaaahu > > >", "asking these questions? Because surely the answer depends on each and every specific", "of GPA in application processes has been up and debated my many here", "too specific, then I ask where do we draw the line? I, for", "I, for instance, don't feel like I'd [ask dumb questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) in seminars/conferences, study/work", "famous example from his own career. So the two main components of the", "in an American university where I would question the [use of funds for", "have I had an overly [ambitious student thinking highly of him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein), and thankfully", "multinational giants that employ in the tens of thousands (if not more) globally.", "components of the question are clearly relevant to many others than myself, these", "frankly I think that's nonsense; there are thousands of people who go through", "the tens of thousands (if not more) globally. The importance of GPA in", "two main components of the question are clearly relevant to many others than", "others than myself, these [53 pages full of hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA) certainly say so.. So", "motivation: > > \"The answer to this question strongly depends on individual factors", "person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your work or", "Nate Eldredge, Wrzlprmft, gman, Fomite, scaaahu > > > Quite frankly I think", "put on-hold with the following motivation: > > \"The answer to this question", "think that's nonsense; there are thousands of people who go through the same", "feel like I'd [ask dumb questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) in seminars/conferences, study/work in an American university", "I would question the [use of funds for sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams), nor have I had", "years, not the least by JeffE with his famous example from his own", "JeffE with his famous example from his own career. So the two main", "generalised to apply to others. (See this discussion for more info.)\" – Nate", "being too specific, then I ask where do we draw the line? I,", "personal values. Thus only someone familiar can answer this question and it cannot", "who go through the same graduate education as I did and the companies", "that's nonsense; there are thousands of people who go through the same graduate", "only someone familiar can answer this question and it cannot be generalised to", "pages full of hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA) certainly say so.. So if the reason my question", "up and debated my many here over the past years, not the least", "student thinking highly of him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein), and thankfully I have never had to [deal", "globally. The importance of GPA in application processes has been up and debated", "same graduate education as I did and the companies I was referring to", "The importance of GPA in application processes has been up and debated my", "an American university where I would question the [use of funds for sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams),", "given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your work or your personal values.", "and the companies I was referring to are multinational giants that employ in", "contents of your work or your personal values. Thus only someone familiar can", "American university where I would question the [use of funds for sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams), nor", "importance of GPA in application processes has been up and debated my many", "such as a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents", "are thousands of people who go through the same graduate education as I", "[53 pages full of hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA) certainly say so.. So if the reason my", "these [53 pages full of hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA) certainly say so.. So if the reason", "not the least by JeffE with his famous example from his own career.", "[recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57676/how-to-deal-with-gpa-related-questions-in-standardized-job-application-forms-if) of mine was apparently put on-hold with the following motivation: >", "the following motivation: > > \"The answer to this question strongly depends on", "seminars/conferences, study/work in an American university where I would question the [use of", "> \"The answer to this question strongly depends on individual factors such as", "apply to others. (See this discussion for more info.)\" – Nate Eldredge, Wrzlprmft,", "to being too specific, then I ask where do we draw the line?", "go through the same graduate education as I did and the companies I", "that employ in the tens of thousands (if not more) globally. The importance", "strongly depends on individual factors such as a certain person’s preferences, a given", "from his own career. So the two main components of the question are", "to others. (See this discussion for more info.)\" – Nate Eldredge, Wrzlprmft, gman,", "the question are clearly relevant to many others than myself, these [53 pages", "we draw the line? I, for instance, don't feel like I'd [ask dumb", "for instance, don't feel like I'd [ask dumb questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) in seminars/conferences, study/work in", "Fomite, scaaahu > > > Quite frankly I think that's nonsense; there are", "employ in the tens of thousands (if not more) globally. The importance of", "info.)\" – Nate Eldredge, Wrzlprmft, gman, Fomite, scaaahu > > > Quite frankly", "[deal with sexual advances from students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students). Should I flag these questions off-topic because", "I was referring to are multinational giants that employ in the tens of", "gman, Fomite, scaaahu > > > Quite frankly I think that's nonsense; there", "been up and debated my many here over the past years, not the", "graduate education as I did and the companies I was referring to are", "and debated my many here over the past years, not the least by", "we cannot know the intricate details of the situation the people asking these", "through the same graduate education as I did and the companies I was", "like I'd [ask dumb questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) in seminars/conferences, study/work in an American university where", "sexual advances from students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students). Should I flag these questions off-topic because we cannot", "question the [use of funds for sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams), nor have I had an overly", "flag these questions off-topic because we cannot know the intricate details of the", "do we draw the line? I, for instance, don't feel like I'd [ask", "study/work in an American university where I would question the [use of funds", "someone familiar can answer this question and it cannot be generalised to apply", "the two main components of the question are clearly relevant to many others", "I have never had to [deal with sexual advances from students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students). Should I", "not more) globally. The importance of GPA in application processes has been up", "clearly relevant to many others than myself, these [53 pages full of hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA)", "certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your work", "so.. So if the reason my question is off-topic due to being too", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57676/how-to-deal-with-gpa-related-questions-in-standardized-job-application-forms-if) of mine was apparently put on-hold with the following motivation: > >", "then I ask where do we draw the line? I, for instance, don't", "where I would question the [use of funds for sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams), nor have I", "to many others than myself, these [53 pages full of hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA) certainly say", "certainly say so.. So if the reason my question is off-topic due to", "to apply to others. (See this discussion for more info.)\" – Nate Eldredge,", "as a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of", "thankfully I have never had to [deal with sexual advances from students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students). Should", "career. So the two main components of the question are clearly relevant to", "university where I would question the [use of funds for sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams), nor have", "application processes has been up and debated my many here over the past", "own career. So the two main components of the question are clearly relevant", "the exact contents of your work or your personal values. Thus only someone", "I had an overly [ambitious student thinking highly of him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein), and thankfully I", "values. Thus only someone familiar can answer this question and it cannot be", "with his famous example from his own career. So the two main components", "question strongly depends on individual factors such as a certain person’s preferences, a", "the people asking these questions? Because surely the answer depends on each and", "the situation the people asking these questions? Because surely the answer depends on", "with the following motivation: > > \"The answer to this question strongly depends", "debated my many here over the past years, not the least by JeffE", "where do we draw the line? I, for instance, don't feel like I'd", "was apparently put on-hold with the following motivation: > > \"The answer to", "example from his own career. So the two main components of the question", "advances from students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students). Should I flag these questions off-topic because we cannot know", "sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams), nor have I had an overly [ambitious student thinking highly of him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein),", "intricate details of the situation the people asking these questions? Because surely the", "from students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students). Should I flag these questions off-topic because we cannot know the", "depends on each and every specific case which may not apply to the", "can answer this question and it cannot be generalised to apply to others.", "an overly [ambitious student thinking highly of him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein), and thankfully I have never", "line? I, for instance, don't feel like I'd [ask dumb questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) in seminars/conferences,", "> > Quite frankly I think that's nonsense; there are thousands of people", "funds for sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams), nor have I had an overly [ambitious student thinking highly", "to are multinational giants that employ in the tens of thousands (if not", "I ask where do we draw the line? I, for instance, don't feel", "questions? Because surely the answer depends on each and every specific case which", "the intricate details of the situation the people asking these questions? Because surely", "be generalised to apply to others. (See this discussion for more info.)\" –", "say so.. So if the reason my question is off-topic due to being", "scaaahu > > > Quite frankly I think that's nonsense; there are thousands", "my question is off-topic due to being too specific, then I ask where", "depends on individual factors such as a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s", "Eldredge, Wrzlprmft, gman, Fomite, scaaahu > > > Quite frankly I think that's", "this discussion for more info.)\" – Nate Eldredge, Wrzlprmft, gman, Fomite, scaaahu >", "your work or your personal values. Thus only someone familiar can answer this", "situation the people asking these questions? Because surely the answer depends on each", "if the reason my question is off-topic due to being too specific, then", "is off-topic due to being too specific, then I ask where do we", "institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your work or your personal values. Thus", "to [deal with sexual advances from students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students). Should I flag these questions off-topic", "are clearly relevant to many others than myself, these [53 pages full of", "this question and it cannot be generalised to apply to others. (See this", "regulations, the exact contents of your work or your personal values. Thus only", "of the question are clearly relevant to many others than myself, these [53", "overly [ambitious student thinking highly of him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein), and thankfully I have never had", "off-topic because we cannot know the intricate details of the situation the people", "this question strongly depends on individual factors such as a certain person’s preferences,", "So the two main components of the question are clearly relevant to many", "the same graduate education as I did and the companies I was referring", "of funds for sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams), nor have I had an overly [ambitious student thinking", "him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein), and thankfully I have never had to [deal with sexual advances from", "the answer depends on each and every specific case which may not apply", "draw the line? I, for instance, don't feel like I'd [ask dumb questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions)", "many here over the past years, not the least by JeffE with his", "are multinational giants that employ in the tens of thousands (if not more)", "his famous example from his own career. So the two main components of", "reason my question is off-topic due to being too specific, then I ask", "more) globally. The importance of GPA in application processes has been up and", "the [use of funds for sports](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16367/why-do-american-colleges-and-universities-have-sports-teams), nor have I had an overly [ambitious", "(See this discussion for more info.)\" – Nate Eldredge, Wrzlprmft, gman, Fomite, scaaahu", "question is off-topic due to being too specific, then I ask where do", "So if the reason my question is off-topic due to being too specific,", "know the intricate details of the situation the people asking these questions? Because", "individual factors such as a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the", "and it cannot be generalised to apply to others. (See this discussion for", "Because surely the answer depends on each and every specific case which may", "don't feel like I'd [ask dumb questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) in seminars/conferences, study/work in an American", "with sexual advances from students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students). Should I flag these questions off-topic because we", "cannot be generalised to apply to others. (See this discussion for more info.)\"", "highly of him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein), and thankfully I have never had to [deal with sexual", "– Nate Eldredge, Wrzlprmft, gman, Fomite, scaaahu > > > Quite frankly I", "over the past years, not the least by JeffE with his famous example", "off-topic due to being too specific, then I ask where do we draw", "never had to [deal with sexual advances from students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students). Should I flag these", "on each and every specific case which may not apply to the general", "thousands of people who go through the same graduate education as I did", "question are clearly relevant to many others than myself, these [53 pages full", "> > \"The answer to this question strongly depends on individual factors such", "answer depends on each and every specific case which may not apply to", "had to [deal with sexual advances from students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/how-to-deal-with-sexual-advances-from-students). Should I flag these questions", "Should I flag these questions off-topic because we cannot know the intricate details", "referring to are multinational giants that employ in the tens of thousands (if", "the companies I was referring to are multinational giants that employ in the", "my many here over the past years, not the least by JeffE with", "did and the companies I was referring to are multinational giants that employ", "instance, don't feel like I'd [ask dumb questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51631/how-to-ask-dumb-questions) in seminars/conferences, study/work in an", "or your personal values. Thus only someone familiar can answer this question and", "main components of the question are clearly relevant to many others than myself,", "nor have I had an overly [ambitious student thinking highly of him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein), and", "following motivation: > > \"The answer to this question strongly depends on individual", "question and it cannot be generalised to apply to others. (See this discussion", "Quite frankly I think that's nonsense; there are thousands of people who go", "> Quite frankly I think that's nonsense; there are thousands of people who", "giants that employ in the tens of thousands (if not more) globally. The", "GPA in application processes has been up and debated my many here over", "specific, then I ask where do we draw the line? I, for instance,", "mine was apparently put on-hold with the following motivation: > > \"The answer", "of hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA) certainly say so.. So if the reason my question is off-topic", "the past years, not the least by JeffE with his famous example from", "cannot know the intricate details of the situation the people asking these questions?", "than myself, these [53 pages full of hits](https://academia.stackexchange.com/search?q=GPA) certainly say so.. So if", "answer this question and it cannot be generalised to apply to others. (See", "was referring to are multinational giants that employ in the tens of thousands", "of thousands (if not more) globally. The importance of GPA in application processes", "tens of thousands (if not more) globally. The importance of GPA in application", "of the situation the people asking these questions? Because surely the answer depends", "thinking highly of him/her-self](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56220/what-to-do-when-your-student-is-convinced-that-he-will-be-the-next-einstein), and thankfully I have never had to [deal with", "work or your personal values. Thus only someone familiar can answer this question", "Thus only someone familiar can answer this question and it cannot be generalised" ]
[ "thing? Like really context specific things where no general answer exists and rather", "until someone tells them how to do thing? Like really context specific things", "things where no general answer exists and rather personal. Because that is the", "and why [such questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57903/should-i-tell-the-instructor-that-i-will-miss-the-next-class) get upvotes? Is it appreciated that people shut down", "and get totally paralyzed until someone tells them how to do thing? Like", "down their brains and get totally paralyzed until someone tells them how to", "stackoverflow and why [such questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57903/should-i-tell-the-instructor-that-i-will-miss-the-next-class) get upvotes? Is it appreciated that people shut", "appreciated that people shut down their brains and get totally paralyzed until someone", "and rather personal. Because that is the impression I am having recently especially", "rather personal. Because that is the impression I am having recently especially on", "general answer exists and rather personal. Because that is the impression I am", "why [such questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57903/should-i-tell-the-instructor-that-i-will-miss-the-next-class) get upvotes? Is it appreciated that people shut down their", "I am having recently especially on Academia. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56543/is-it-considered-cheating-if-i-purchase-an-essay-but-then-dont-use-it) with impressive 33 upvotes", "someone tells them how to do thing? Like really context specific things where", "explain the philosophy of stackoverflow and why [such questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57903/should-i-tell-the-instructor-that-i-will-miss-the-next-class) get upvotes? Is it", "how to do thing? Like really context specific things where no general answer", "context specific things where no general answer exists and rather personal. Because that", "no general answer exists and rather personal. Because that is the impression I", "answer exists and rather personal. Because that is the impression I am having", "the philosophy of stackoverflow and why [such questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57903/should-i-tell-the-instructor-that-i-will-miss-the-next-class) get upvotes? Is it appreciated", "please explain the philosophy of stackoverflow and why [such questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57903/should-i-tell-the-instructor-that-i-will-miss-the-next-class) get upvotes? Is", "where no general answer exists and rather personal. Because that is the impression", "recently especially on Academia. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56543/is-it-considered-cheating-if-i-purchase-an-essay-but-then-dont-use-it) with impressive 33 upvotes is another example.", "them how to do thing? Like really context specific things where no general", "Is it appreciated that people shut down their brains and get totally paralyzed", "[such questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57903/should-i-tell-the-instructor-that-i-will-miss-the-next-class) get upvotes? Is it appreciated that people shut down their brains", "is the impression I am having recently especially on Academia. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56543/is-it-considered-cheating-if-i-purchase-an-essay-but-then-dont-use-it) with", "Can someone please explain the philosophy of stackoverflow and why [such questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57903/should-i-tell-the-instructor-that-i-will-miss-the-next-class) get", "personal. Because that is the impression I am having recently especially on Academia.", "questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57903/should-i-tell-the-instructor-that-i-will-miss-the-next-class) get upvotes? Is it appreciated that people shut down their brains and", "someone please explain the philosophy of stackoverflow and why [such questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57903/should-i-tell-the-instructor-that-i-will-miss-the-next-class) get upvotes?", "to do thing? Like really context specific things where no general answer exists", "shut down their brains and get totally paralyzed until someone tells them how", "upvotes? Is it appreciated that people shut down their brains and get totally", "Because that is the impression I am having recently especially on Academia. [This", "exists and rather personal. Because that is the impression I am having recently", "tells them how to do thing? Like really context specific things where no", "people shut down their brains and get totally paralyzed until someone tells them", "do thing? Like really context specific things where no general answer exists and", "paralyzed until someone tells them how to do thing? Like really context specific", "impression I am having recently especially on Academia. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56543/is-it-considered-cheating-if-i-purchase-an-essay-but-then-dont-use-it) with impressive 33", "philosophy of stackoverflow and why [such questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57903/should-i-tell-the-instructor-that-i-will-miss-the-next-class) get upvotes? Is it appreciated that", "really context specific things where no general answer exists and rather personal. Because", "of stackoverflow and why [such questions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57903/should-i-tell-the-instructor-that-i-will-miss-the-next-class) get upvotes? Is it appreciated that people", "am having recently especially on Academia. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56543/is-it-considered-cheating-if-i-purchase-an-essay-but-then-dont-use-it) with impressive 33 upvotes is", "that is the impression I am having recently especially on Academia. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56543/is-it-considered-cheating-if-i-purchase-an-essay-but-then-dont-use-it)", "brains and get totally paralyzed until someone tells them how to do thing?", "having recently especially on Academia. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56543/is-it-considered-cheating-if-i-purchase-an-essay-but-then-dont-use-it) with impressive 33 upvotes is another", "totally paralyzed until someone tells them how to do thing? Like really context", "Like really context specific things where no general answer exists and rather personal.", "specific things where no general answer exists and rather personal. Because that is", "get upvotes? Is it appreciated that people shut down their brains and get", "that people shut down their brains and get totally paralyzed until someone tells", "the impression I am having recently especially on Academia. [This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/56543/is-it-considered-cheating-if-i-purchase-an-essay-but-then-dont-use-it) with impressive", "their brains and get totally paralyzed until someone tells them how to do", "get totally paralyzed until someone tells them how to do thing? Like really", "it appreciated that people shut down their brains and get totally paralyzed until" ]
[ "attributed (if somewhat wrongly; the quotes mention \"stackoverflow.com\"). I've come across this before,", "is an example for the question I looked into. It's attributed (if somewhat", "\"stackoverflow.com\"). I've come across this before, either as a question on the site-wide", "the question I looked into. It's attributed (if somewhat wrongly; the quotes mention", "came across a web site whose entire focus is to scoop from Academia", "the one of mathematics; but forgot if SE takes action in such cases.", "another completely if it turns into a massive copy and paste operation to", "but forgot if SE takes action in such cases. Despite the attribution, it", "Academia SE; [here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html) is an example for the question I looked into. It's", "across this before, either as a question on the site-wide meta, or the", "[here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html) is an example for the question I looked into. It's attributed (if", "come across this before, either as a question on the site-wide meta, or", "if SE takes action in such cases. Despite the attribution, it just doesn't", "mention \"stackoverflow.com\"). I've come across this before, either as a question on the", "question in your blog, or tweet it; another completely if it turns into", "your blog, or tweet it; another completely if it turns into a massive", "SE; [here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html) is an example for the question I looked into. It's attributed", "right. It's one thing to quote a favorite question in your blog, or", "takes action in such cases. Despite the attribution, it just doesn't seem right.", "the site-wide meta, or the one of mathematics; but forgot if SE takes", "to scoop from Academia SE; [here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html) is an example for the question I", "attribution, it just doesn't seem right. It's one thing to quote a favorite", "cases. Despite the attribution, it just doesn't seem right. It's one thing to", "one of mathematics; but forgot if SE takes action in such cases. Despite", "completely if it turns into a massive copy and paste operation to generate", "site-wide meta, or the one of mathematics; but forgot if SE takes action", "It's one thing to quote a favorite question in your blog, or tweet", "as a question on the site-wide meta, or the one of mathematics; but", "either as a question on the site-wide meta, or the one of mathematics;", "if it turns into a massive copy and paste operation to generate content.", "web site whose entire focus is to scoop from Academia SE; [here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html) is", "somewhat wrongly; the quotes mention \"stackoverflow.com\"). I've come across this before, either as", "entire focus is to scoop from Academia SE; [here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html) is an example for", "I've come across this before, either as a question on the site-wide meta,", "or the one of mathematics; but forgot if SE takes action in such", "just doesn't seem right. It's one thing to quote a favorite question in", "it just doesn't seem right. It's one thing to quote a favorite question", "question I looked into. It's attributed (if somewhat wrongly; the quotes mention \"stackoverflow.com\").", "recent question better, I came across a web site whose entire focus is", "scoop from Academia SE; [here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html) is an example for the question I looked", "It's attributed (if somewhat wrongly; the quotes mention \"stackoverflow.com\"). I've come across this", "from Academia SE; [here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html) is an example for the question I looked into.", "doesn't seem right. It's one thing to quote a favorite question in your", "tweet it; another completely if it turns into a massive copy and paste", "I looked into. It's attributed (if somewhat wrongly; the quotes mention \"stackoverflow.com\"). I've", "into. It's attributed (if somewhat wrongly; the quotes mention \"stackoverflow.com\"). I've come across", "favorite question in your blog, or tweet it; another completely if it turns", "a favorite question in your blog, or tweet it; another completely if it", "of mathematics; but forgot if SE takes action in such cases. Despite the", "a recent question better, I came across a web site whose entire focus", "quotes mention \"stackoverflow.com\"). I've come across this before, either as a question on", "question on the site-wide meta, or the one of mathematics; but forgot if", "whose entire focus is to scoop from Academia SE; [here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html) is an example", "Despite the attribution, it just doesn't seem right. It's one thing to quote", "a web site whose entire focus is to scoop from Academia SE; [here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html)", "blog, or tweet it; another completely if it turns into a massive copy", "action in such cases. Despite the attribution, it just doesn't seem right. It's", "(if somewhat wrongly; the quotes mention \"stackoverflow.com\"). I've come across this before, either", "mathematics; but forgot if SE takes action in such cases. Despite the attribution,", "better, I came across a web site whose entire focus is to scoop", "to quote a favorite question in your blog, or tweet it; another completely", "question better, I came across a web site whose entire focus is to", "such cases. Despite the attribution, it just doesn't seem right. It's one thing", "one thing to quote a favorite question in your blog, or tweet it;", "it; another completely if it turns into a massive copy and paste operation", "across a web site whose entire focus is to scoop from Academia SE;", "in your blog, or tweet it; another completely if it turns into a", "When googling to understand a recent question better, I came across a web", "site whose entire focus is to scoop from Academia SE; [here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html) is an", "looked into. It's attributed (if somewhat wrongly; the quotes mention \"stackoverflow.com\"). I've come", "to understand a recent question better, I came across a web site whose", "this before, either as a question on the site-wide meta, or the one", "I came across a web site whose entire focus is to scoop from", "the quotes mention \"stackoverflow.com\"). I've come across this before, either as a question", "wrongly; the quotes mention \"stackoverflow.com\"). I've come across this before, either as a", "quote a favorite question in your blog, or tweet it; another completely if", "the attribution, it just doesn't seem right. It's one thing to quote a", "a question on the site-wide meta, or the one of mathematics; but forgot", "meta, or the one of mathematics; but forgot if SE takes action in", "an example for the question I looked into. It's attributed (if somewhat wrongly;", "for the question I looked into. It's attributed (if somewhat wrongly; the quotes", "understand a recent question better, I came across a web site whose entire", "SE takes action in such cases. Despite the attribution, it just doesn't seem", "in such cases. Despite the attribution, it just doesn't seem right. It's one", "googling to understand a recent question better, I came across a web site", "before, either as a question on the site-wide meta, or the one of", "example for the question I looked into. It's attributed (if somewhat wrongly; the", "thing to quote a favorite question in your blog, or tweet it; another", "focus is to scoop from Academia SE; [here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html) is an example for the", "on the site-wide meta, or the one of mathematics; but forgot if SE", "seem right. It's one thing to quote a favorite question in your blog,", "forgot if SE takes action in such cases. Despite the attribution, it just", "or tweet it; another completely if it turns into a massive copy and", "is to scoop from Academia SE; [here](http://newtips.co/academia/questions/56389/job-advertisement-liaise-professionally.html) is an example for the question" ]
[ "to clarify the use of this tag? We could create another tag that", "that *is* about \"continuous exposition by the teacher,\" but I don't know how", "we do to clarify the use of this tag? We could create another", "about the job of lecturer, a specific academic job title that exists in", "tag that *is* about \"continuous exposition by the teacher,\" but I don't know", "by the teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\" What can we do to clarify the use of this", "to name the tags so that the distinction will be clear to taggers.", "of the world. However, users keep applying this tag to questions about lecturing,", "questions tagged 'lecturer'\") tag is supposed to be for questions about the job", "tag to questions about lecturing, in the sense of \"[continuous exposition by the", "parts of the world. However, users keep applying this tag to questions about", "applying this tag to questions about lecturing, in the sense of \"[continuous exposition", "about lecturing, in the sense of \"[continuous exposition by the teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\" What can", "job title that exists in some parts of the world. However, users keep", "the teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\" What can we do to clarify the use of this tag?", "users keep applying this tag to questions about lecturing, in the sense of", "exists in some parts of the world. However, users keep applying this tag", "I don't know how to name the tags so that the distinction will", "the teacher,\" but I don't know how to name the tags so that", "academic job title that exists in some parts of the world. However, users", "of \"[continuous exposition by the teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\" What can we do to clarify the", "*is* about \"continuous exposition by the teacher,\" but I don't know how to", "the world. However, users keep applying this tag to questions about lecturing, in", "by the teacher,\" but I don't know how to name the tags so", "job of lecturer, a specific academic job title that exists in some parts", "\"[continuous exposition by the teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\" What can we do to clarify the use", "this tag to questions about lecturing, in the sense of \"[continuous exposition by", "the use of this tag? We could create another tag that *is* about", "about \"continuous exposition by the teacher,\" but I don't know how to name", "tagged 'lecturer'\") tag is supposed to be for questions about the job of", "do to clarify the use of this tag? We could create another tag", "in the sense of \"[continuous exposition by the teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\" What can we do", "of lecturer, a specific academic job title that exists in some parts of", "this tag? We could create another tag that *is* about \"continuous exposition by", "supposed to be for questions about the job of lecturer, a specific academic", "another tag that *is* about \"continuous exposition by the teacher,\" but I don't", "However, users keep applying this tag to questions about lecturing, in the sense", "[lecturer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lecturer \"show questions tagged 'lecturer'\") tag is supposed to be for questions about", "sense of \"[continuous exposition by the teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\" What can we do to clarify", "could create another tag that *is* about \"continuous exposition by the teacher,\" but", "teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\" What can we do to clarify the use of this tag? We", "how to name the tags so that the distinction will be clear to", "in some parts of the world. However, users keep applying this tag to", "The [lecturer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/lecturer \"show questions tagged 'lecturer'\") tag is supposed to be for questions", "know how to name the tags so that the distinction will be clear", "use of this tag? We could create another tag that *is* about \"continuous", "to be for questions about the job of lecturer, a specific academic job", "a specific academic job title that exists in some parts of the world.", "tag is supposed to be for questions about the job of lecturer, a", "lecturing, in the sense of \"[continuous exposition by the teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\" What can we", "What can we do to clarify the use of this tag? We could", "tag? We could create another tag that *is* about \"continuous exposition by the", "the job of lecturer, a specific academic job title that exists in some", "don't know how to name the tags so that the distinction will be", "world. However, users keep applying this tag to questions about lecturing, in the", "of this tag? We could create another tag that *is* about \"continuous exposition", "be for questions about the job of lecturer, a specific academic job title", "some parts of the world. However, users keep applying this tag to questions", "is supposed to be for questions about the job of lecturer, a specific", "'lecturer'\") tag is supposed to be for questions about the job of lecturer,", "that exists in some parts of the world. However, users keep applying this", "to questions about lecturing, in the sense of \"[continuous exposition by the teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\"", "title that exists in some parts of the world. However, users keep applying", "the sense of \"[continuous exposition by the teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\" What can we do to", "create another tag that *is* about \"continuous exposition by the teacher,\" but I", "exposition by the teacher,\" but I don't know how to name the tags", "lecturer, a specific academic job title that exists in some parts of the", "teacher,\" but I don't know how to name the tags so that the", "questions about lecturing, in the sense of \"[continuous exposition by the teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\" What", "questions about the job of lecturer, a specific academic job title that exists", "specific academic job title that exists in some parts of the world. However,", "for questions about the job of lecturer, a specific academic job title that", "clarify the use of this tag? We could create another tag that *is*", "but I don't know how to name the tags so that the distinction", "keep applying this tag to questions about lecturing, in the sense of \"[continuous", "can we do to clarify the use of this tag? We could create", "\"continuous exposition by the teacher,\" but I don't know how to name the", "\"show questions tagged 'lecturer'\") tag is supposed to be for questions about the", "We could create another tag that *is* about \"continuous exposition by the teacher,\"", "exposition by the teacher](http://derekbruff.org/?p=3126).\" What can we do to clarify the use of" ]
[ "marginally related to research, such as publishing a research paper. In hope to", "In hope to reduce this misuse, I suggest to rename it to [researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching", "related to research, such as publishing a research paper. In hope to reduce", "synonymising [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), because the change would be pointless otherwise.", "questions tagged 'research'\") is frequently used for almost all sorts of questions only", "publishing a research paper. In hope to reduce this misuse, I suggest to", "a research paper. In hope to reduce this misuse, I suggest to rename", "has the advantage of excluding the product of research, but still includes performing", "still includes performing research, which the tag is about. This should happen **without**", "**without** synonymising [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), because the change would be pointless", "rename it to [researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching \"show questions tagged 'researching'\"), which has the advantage of", "of questions only marginally related to research, such as publishing a research paper.", "of excluding the product of research, but still includes performing research, which the", "research, such as publishing a research paper. In hope to reduce this misuse,", "almost all sorts of questions only marginally related to research, such as publishing", "to [researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching \"show questions tagged 'researching'\"), which has the advantage of excluding the", "which the tag is about. This should happen **without** synonymising [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions", "paper. In hope to reduce this misuse, I suggest to rename it to", "'research'\") is frequently used for almost all sorts of questions only marginally related", "[research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\") is frequently used for almost all sorts of", "all sorts of questions only marginally related to research, such as publishing a", "advantage of excluding the product of research, but still includes performing research, which", "performing research, which the tag is about. This should happen **without** synonymising [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research", "but still includes performing research, which the tag is about. This should happen", "about. This should happen **without** synonymising [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), because the", "This should happen **without** synonymising [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), because the change", "hope to reduce this misuse, I suggest to rename it to [researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching \"show", "product of research, but still includes performing research, which the tag is about.", "includes performing research, which the tag is about. This should happen **without** synonymising", "is about. This should happen **without** synonymising [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), because", "it to [researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching \"show questions tagged 'researching'\"), which has the advantage of excluding", "reduce this misuse, I suggest to rename it to [researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching \"show questions tagged", "tag is about. This should happen **without** synonymising [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"),", "as publishing a research paper. In hope to reduce this misuse, I suggest", "sorts of questions only marginally related to research, such as publishing a research", "the tag is about. This should happen **without** synonymising [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged", "such as publishing a research paper. In hope to reduce this misuse, I", "misuse, I suggest to rename it to [researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching \"show questions tagged 'researching'\"), which", "questions tagged 'researching'\"), which has the advantage of excluding the product of research,", "the advantage of excluding the product of research, but still includes performing research,", "happen **without** synonymising [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), because the change would be", "only marginally related to research, such as publishing a research paper. In hope", "this misuse, I suggest to rename it to [researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching \"show questions tagged 'researching'\"),", "\"show questions tagged 'researching'\"), which has the advantage of excluding the product of", "to research, such as publishing a research paper. In hope to reduce this", "'researching'\"), which has the advantage of excluding the product of research, but still", "used for almost all sorts of questions only marginally related to research, such", "excluding the product of research, but still includes performing research, which the tag", "research, which the tag is about. This should happen **without** synonymising [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show", "to rename it to [researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching \"show questions tagged 'researching'\"), which has the advantage", "research paper. In hope to reduce this misuse, I suggest to rename it", "\"show questions tagged 'research'\") is frequently used for almost all sorts of questions", "is frequently used for almost all sorts of questions only marginally related to", "research, but still includes performing research, which the tag is about. This should", "suggest to rename it to [researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching \"show questions tagged 'researching'\"), which has the", "I suggest to rename it to [researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching \"show questions tagged 'researching'\"), which has", "tagged 'researching'\"), which has the advantage of excluding the product of research, but", "the product of research, but still includes performing research, which the tag is", "for almost all sorts of questions only marginally related to research, such as", "of research, but still includes performing research, which the tag is about. This", "questions only marginally related to research, such as publishing a research paper. In", "[researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching \"show questions tagged 'researching'\"), which has the advantage of excluding the product", "which has the advantage of excluding the product of research, but still includes", "to reduce this misuse, I suggest to rename it to [researching](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/researching \"show questions", "should happen **without** synonymising [research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/research \"show questions tagged 'research'\"), because the change would", "frequently used for almost all sorts of questions only marginally related to research,", "tagged 'research'\") is frequently used for almost all sorts of questions only marginally" ]
[ "PhD candidate seeking postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc) and it got many downvotes soon, without any comment.", "postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc) and it got many downvotes soon, without any comment. I don't know", "a PhD candidate seeking postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc) and it got many downvotes soon, without any", "I asked a question [picture on the academic page of a PhD candidate", "many downvotes soon, without any comment. I don't know the reason. Is my", "any comment. I don't know the reason. Is my question off-topic on Academic", "got many downvotes soon, without any comment. I don't know the reason. Is", "question [picture on the academic page of a PhD candidate seeking postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc) and", "soon, without any comment. I don't know the reason. Is my question off-topic", "comment. I don't know the reason. Is my question off-topic on Academic Exchange?", "[picture on the academic page of a PhD candidate seeking postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc) and it", "academic page of a PhD candidate seeking postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc) and it got many downvotes", "without any comment. I don't know the reason. Is my question off-topic on", "the academic page of a PhD candidate seeking postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc) and it got many", "it got many downvotes soon, without any comment. I don't know the reason.", "of a PhD candidate seeking postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc) and it got many downvotes soon, without", "downvotes soon, without any comment. I don't know the reason. Is my question", "and it got many downvotes soon, without any comment. I don't know the", "asked a question [picture on the academic page of a PhD candidate seeking", "page of a PhD candidate seeking postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc) and it got many downvotes soon,", "on the academic page of a PhD candidate seeking postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc) and it got", "candidate seeking postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc) and it got many downvotes soon, without any comment. I", "seeking postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc) and it got many downvotes soon, without any comment. I don't", "a question [picture on the academic page of a PhD candidate seeking postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58955/picture-on-the-academic-page-of-a-phd-candidate-seeking-postdoc)" ]
[ "that require expertise in law to answer should be asked at [Law Stack", "should be asked at [Law Stack Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/), not here. Similarly, questions about [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues", "considered off-topic here because an expert answer to such a question would come", "(\"What graduate degree will help me get a job as X?\") > *", "tagged 'legal-issues'\") affecting academics that require expertise in law to answer should be", "under civil law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law) is about academic publishing, which is on-topic, but needs expertise", "on-topic, but requires expertise in adult learning disabilities (i.e. from psychologists, educational specialists,", "academicians > * Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research topic", "> * Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research topic (a", "about life as a graduate student, which is on-topic, but requires expertise in", "to this list in the help center > > However, please do *not*", "For example, questions about [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") affecting academics that require", "get a job as X?\") > * The content of your research, rather", "than the process of doing research > > > > > specifying that", "* [How does one determine he has a learning disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability) is about life", "Should we add another item to this list in the help center >", "questions about [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") affecting academics that require medical expertise", "topic (a \"shopping question\") > * Preparation for a non-academic career (\"What graduate", "or research topic (a \"shopping question\") > * Preparation for a non-academic career", "recommendations for a university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\") > *", "example, * [Are Harvard-style open access policies lawful under civil law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law) is about", "or post-graduate academicians > * Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or", "that this kind of question is off-topic? For example, we might add >", "research topic (a \"shopping question\") > * Preparation for a non-academic career (\"What", "learning disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability) is about life as a graduate student, which is on-topic, but", "specialists, etc.), not expertise in academia, to answer. Should we add another item", "lawful under civil law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law) is about academic publishing, which is on-topic, but needs", "student, which is on-topic, but requires expertise in adult learning disabilities (i.e. from", "this list in the help center > > However, please do *not* ask", "is about academic publishing, which is on-topic, but needs expertise in law (not", "as X?\") > * The content of your research, rather than the process", "example, we might add > > Subjects that require expertise from another domain,", "open access policies lawful under civil law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law) is about academic publishing, which is", "specifying that this kind of question is off-topic? For example, we might add", "questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") affecting academics that require expertise in law to answer should", "which is on-topic, but requires expertise in adult learning disabilities (i.e. from psychologists,", "that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > * Suggestions or", "apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > * Suggestions or recommendations for a", "a graduate student, which is on-topic, but requires expertise in adult learning disabilities", "learning disabilities (i.e. from psychologists, educational specialists, etc.), not expertise in academia, to", "expert in something else (not academia.) For example, * [Are Harvard-style open access", "disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability) is about life as a graduate student, which is on-topic, but requires", "to answer. * [How does one determine he has a learning disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability) is", "answered by experts in academia. For example, questions about [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged", "not here. Similarly, questions about [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") affecting academics that", "academics that require expertise in law to answer should be asked at [Law", "is off-topic? For example, we might add > > Subjects that require expertise", "for a non-academic career (\"What graduate degree will help me get a job", "* [Are Harvard-style open access policies lawful under civil law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law) is about academic", "expertise in adult learning disabilities (i.e. from psychologists, educational specialists, etc.), not expertise", "else (not academia.) For example, * [Are Harvard-style open access policies lawful under", "about [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") affecting academics that require medical expertise to", "in academia, to answer. Should we add another item to this list in", "* Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping", "academics that require medical expertise to answer should be asked at [Health Stack", "rather than the process of doing research > > > > > specifying", "expertise to answer should be asked at [Health Stack Exchange](https://health.stackexchange.com/), not here. >", "> specifying that this kind of question is off-topic? For example, we might", "> * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians", "> Subjects that require expertise from another domain, that could not reasonably be", "does one determine he has a learning disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability) is about life as a", "come from an expert in something else (not academia.) For example, * [Are", "[Are Harvard-style open access policies lawful under civil law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law) is about academic publishing,", "help me get a job as X?\") > * The content of your", "is about life as a graduate student, which is on-topic, but requires expertise", "expertise from another domain, that could not reasonably be answered by experts in", "expertise in academia, to answer. Should we add another item to this list", "has a learning disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability) is about life as a graduate student, which is", "be answered by experts in academia. For example, questions about [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions", "example, questions about [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") affecting academics that require expertise", "law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law) is about academic publishing, which is on-topic, but needs expertise in law", "requires expertise in adult learning disabilities (i.e. from psychologists, educational specialists, etc.), not", "(i.e. from psychologists, educational specialists, etc.), not expertise in academia, to answer. Should", "of question is off-topic? For example, we might add > > Subjects that", "that require expertise from another domain, that could not reasonably be answered by", "tagged 'health-issues'\") affecting academics that require medical expertise to answer should be asked", "> * Preparation for a non-academic career (\"What graduate degree will help me", "\"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") affecting academics that require expertise in law to answer", "law to answer should be asked at [Law Stack Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/), not here. Similarly,", "might add > > Subjects that require expertise from another domain, that could", "> > > specifying that this kind of question is off-topic? For example,", "questions that *are* about the on-topic areas listed in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), but", "areas listed in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), but that are considered off-topic here because", "at [Law Stack Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/), not here. Similarly, questions about [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged", "in law to answer should be asked at [Law Stack Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/), not here.", "because an expert answer to such a question would come from an expert", "require expertise in law to answer should be asked at [Law Stack Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/),", "or recommendations for a university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\") >", "civil law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law) is about academic publishing, which is on-topic, but needs expertise in", "graduate or post-graduate academicians > * Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal,", "process of doing research > > > > > specifying that this kind", "experts in academia. For example, questions about [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") affecting", "to answer. Should we add another item to this list in the help", "post-graduate academicians > * Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research", "* The content of your research, rather than the process of doing research", "job as X?\") > * The content of your research, rather than the", "in something else (not academia.) For example, * [Are Harvard-style open access policies", "[health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") affecting academics that require medical expertise to answer", "[How does one determine he has a learning disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability) is about life as", "academia) to answer. * [How does one determine he has a learning disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability)", "a learning disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability) is about life as a graduate student, which is on-topic,", "university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\") > * Preparation for a", "The content of your research, rather than the process of doing research >", "[Law Stack Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/), not here. Similarly, questions about [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\")", "we get questions that *are* about the on-topic areas listed in the [help", "questions about > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to", "\"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") affecting academics that require medical expertise to answer should", "policies lawful under civil law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law) is about academic publishing, which is on-topic, but", "Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > *", "in law (not expertise in academia) to answer. * [How does one determine", "domain, that could not reasonably be answered by experts in academia. For example,", "this kind of question is off-topic? For example, we might add > >", "not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > * Suggestions or recommendations for", "here. Similarly, questions about [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") affecting academics that require", "Harvard-style open access policies lawful under civil law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law) is about academic publishing, which", "> > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate", "(a \"shopping question\") > * Preparation for a non-academic career (\"What graduate degree", "career (\"What graduate degree will help me get a job as X?\") >", "research > > > > > specifying that this kind of question is", "questions about [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") affecting academics that require expertise in", "reasonably be answered by experts in academia. For example, questions about [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show", "Stack Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/), not here. Similarly, questions about [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") affecting", "* Preparation for a non-academic career (\"What graduate degree will help me get", "For example, * [Are Harvard-style open access policies lawful under civil law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law) is", "issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > * Suggestions", "kind of question is off-topic? For example, we might add > > Subjects", "about [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") affecting academics that require expertise in law", "something else (not academia.) For example, * [Are Harvard-style open access policies lawful", "doing research > > > > > specifying that this kind of question", "question\") > * Preparation for a non-academic career (\"What graduate degree will help", "the process of doing research > > > > > specifying that this", "Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\")", "publishing, which is on-topic, but needs expertise in law (not expertise in academia)", "could not reasonably be answered by experts in academia. For example, questions about", "[help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), but that are considered off-topic here because an expert answer to", "about the on-topic areas listed in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), but that are considered", "to graduate or post-graduate academicians > * Suggestions or recommendations for a university,", "for a university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\") > * Preparation", "do *not* ask questions about > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could", "disabilities (i.e. from psychologists, educational specialists, etc.), not expertise in academia, to answer.", "needs expertise in law (not expertise in academia) to answer. * [How does", "answer. Should we add another item to this list in the help center", "life as a graduate student, which is on-topic, but requires expertise in adult", "that could not reasonably be answered by experts in academia. For example, questions", "that are considered off-topic here because an expert answer to such a question", "For example, we might add > > Subjects that require expertise from another", "a university, journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\") > * Preparation for", "me get a job as X?\") > * The content of your research,", "expertise in law (not expertise in academia) to answer. * [How does one", "your research, rather than the process of doing research > > > >", "a question would come from an expert in something else (not academia.) For", "would come from an expert in something else (not academia.) For example, *", "Similarly, questions about [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") affecting academics that require medical", "degree will help me get a job as X?\") > * The content", "is on-topic, but requires expertise in adult learning disabilities (i.e. from psychologists, educational", "listed in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), but that are considered off-topic here because an", "*not* ask questions about > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not", "* Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians >", "law (not expertise in academia) to answer. * [How does one determine he", "one determine he has a learning disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability) is about life as a graduate", "ask questions about > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply", "the on-topic areas listed in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), but that are considered off-topic", "etc.), not expertise in academia, to answer. Should we add another item to", "affecting academics that require medical expertise to answer should be asked at [Health", "adult learning disabilities (i.e. from psychologists, educational specialists, etc.), not expertise in academia,", "> * The content of your research, rather than the process of doing", "academia. For example, questions about [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") affecting academics that", "on-topic areas listed in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), but that are considered off-topic here", "graduate student, which is on-topic, but requires expertise in adult learning disabilities (i.e.", "on-topic, but needs expertise in law (not expertise in academia) to answer. *", "from psychologists, educational specialists, etc.), not expertise in academia, to answer. Should we", "Subjects that require expertise from another domain, that could not reasonably be answered", "academia, to answer. Should we add another item to this list in the", "as a graduate student, which is on-topic, but requires expertise in adult learning", "> > specifying that this kind of question is off-topic? For example, we", "here because an expert answer to such a question would come from an", "> > However, please do *not* ask questions about > > > *", "by experts in academia. For example, questions about [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\")", "get questions that *are* about the on-topic areas listed in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic),", "not reasonably be answered by experts in academia. For example, questions about [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues", "which is on-topic, but needs expertise in law (not expertise in academia) to", "please do *not* ask questions about > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that", "in academia. For example, questions about [legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") affecting academics", "> > Subjects that require expertise from another domain, that could not reasonably", "(not expertise in academia) to answer. * [How does one determine he has", "to such a question would come from an expert in something else (not", "we might add > > Subjects that require expertise from another domain, that", "that require medical expertise to answer should be asked at [Health Stack Exchange](https://health.stackexchange.com/),", "Preparation for a non-academic career (\"What graduate degree will help me get a", "expert answer to such a question would come from an expert in something", "in academia) to answer. * [How does one determine he has a learning", "center > > However, please do *not* ask questions about > > >", "research, rather than the process of doing research > > > > >", "require medical expertise to answer should be asked at [Health Stack Exchange](https://health.stackexchange.com/), not", "off-topic here because an expert answer to such a question would come from", "of doing research > > > > > specifying that this kind of", "journal, or research topic (a \"shopping question\") > * Preparation for a non-academic", "determine he has a learning disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability) is about life as a graduate student,", "in the help center > > However, please do *not* ask questions about", "about > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate", "not expertise in academia, to answer. Should we add another item to this", "question would come from an expert in something else (not academia.) For example,", "help center > > However, please do *not* ask questions about > >", "> However, please do *not* ask questions about > > > * Undergraduate-specific", "answer should be asked at [Health Stack Exchange](https://health.stackexchange.com/), not here. > > >", "but needs expertise in law (not expertise in academia) to answer. * [How", "the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), but that are considered off-topic here because an expert answer", "a non-academic career (\"What graduate degree will help me get a job as", "about academic publishing, which is on-topic, but needs expertise in law (not expertise", "from another domain, that could not reasonably be answered by experts in academia.", "academia.) For example, * [Are Harvard-style open access policies lawful under civil law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law)", "he has a learning disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability) is about life as a graduate student, which", "to answer should be asked at [Law Stack Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/), not here. Similarly, questions", "medical expertise to answer should be asked at [Health Stack Exchange](https://health.stackexchange.com/), not here.", "questions tagged 'health-issues'\") affecting academics that require medical expertise to answer should be", "to answer should be asked at [Health Stack Exchange](https://health.stackexchange.com/), not here. > >", "an expert answer to such a question would come from an expert in", "non-academic career (\"What graduate degree will help me get a job as X?\")", "the help center > > However, please do *not* ask questions about >", "academic publishing, which is on-topic, but needs expertise in law (not expertise in", "of your research, rather than the process of doing research > > >", "off-topic? For example, we might add > > Subjects that require expertise from", "but requires expertise in adult learning disabilities (i.e. from psychologists, educational specialists, etc.),", "add another item to this list in the help center > > However,", "add > > Subjects that require expertise from another domain, that could not", "> > > * Undergraduate-specific issues that could not apply to graduate or", "\"shopping question\") > * Preparation for a non-academic career (\"What graduate degree will", "that *are* about the on-topic areas listed in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), but that", "X?\") > * The content of your research, rather than the process of", "a job as X?\") > * The content of your research, rather than", "will help me get a job as X?\") > * The content of", "> > > > > specifying that this kind of question is off-topic?", "could not apply to graduate or post-graduate academicians > * Suggestions or recommendations", "> > > > specifying that this kind of question is off-topic? For", "answer. * [How does one determine he has a learning disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59007/how-does-one-determine-he-has-a-learning-disability) is about", "[legal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/legal-issues \"show questions tagged 'legal-issues'\") affecting academics that require expertise in law to", "another item to this list in the help center > > However, please", "in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), but that are considered off-topic here because an expert", "be asked at [Law Stack Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/), not here. Similarly, questions about [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show", "is on-topic, but needs expertise in law (not expertise in academia) to answer.", "Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/), not here. Similarly, questions about [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") affecting academics", "an expert in something else (not academia.) For example, * [Are Harvard-style open", "from an expert in something else (not academia.) For example, * [Are Harvard-style", "affecting academics that require expertise in law to answer should be asked at", "answer to such a question would come from an expert in something else", "require expertise from another domain, that could not reasonably be answered by experts", "'legal-issues'\") affecting academics that require expertise in law to answer should be asked", "Occasionally we get questions that *are* about the on-topic areas listed in the", "access policies lawful under civil law?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/58972/are-harvard-style-open-access-policies-lawful-under-civil-law) is about academic publishing, which is on-topic,", "However, please do *not* ask questions about > > > * Undergraduate-specific issues", "graduate degree will help me get a job as X?\") > * The", "expertise in law to answer should be asked at [Law Stack Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/), not", "asked at [Law Stack Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/), not here. Similarly, questions about [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions", "content of your research, rather than the process of doing research > >", "*are* about the on-topic areas listed in the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), but that are", "such a question would come from an expert in something else (not academia.)", "but that are considered off-topic here because an expert answer to such a", "we add another item to this list in the help center > >", "item to this list in the help center > > However, please do", "are considered off-topic here because an expert answer to such a question would", "(not academia.) For example, * [Are Harvard-style open access policies lawful under civil", "psychologists, educational specialists, etc.), not expertise in academia, to answer. Should we add", "list in the help center > > However, please do *not* ask questions", "another domain, that could not reasonably be answered by experts in academia. For", "answer should be asked at [Law Stack Exchange](https://law.stackexchange.com/), not here. Similarly, questions about", "expertise in academia) to answer. * [How does one determine he has a", "'health-issues'\") affecting academics that require medical expertise to answer should be asked at", "educational specialists, etc.), not expertise in academia, to answer. Should we add another", "center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic), but that are considered off-topic here because an expert answer to such", "in adult learning disabilities (i.e. from psychologists, educational specialists, etc.), not expertise in", "question is off-topic? For example, we might add > > Subjects that require" ]
[ "to be. Now the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) states: > > You should only ask", "attract viewers and votes) that are at least on the edge of plausibilty.", "these questions are naturally attracting a considerable amount of votes and views, they", "and +15/−8 votes in 8 days; closed as a duplicate. These questions are", "it’s impossible to determine with high confidence whether these situations are really made", "reviewers at a top journal rejected it \"by simply reading the title\". What", "questions based on actual problems that you face. > > > which would", "(which are thus likely to attract viewers and votes) that are at least", "which would make these questions officially closeworthy, if the situations are indeed made", "part of a scheme to game the system. On the other hand, it’s", "are fishy and leave the impression that the asker is not really as", "situations are indeed made up. Also, as these questions are naturally attracting a", "closeworthy, if the situations are indeed made up. Also, as these questions are", "views and +15/−8 votes in 8 days; closed as a duplicate. These questions", "thus likely to attract viewers and votes) that are at least on the", "questions are naturally attracting a considerable amount of votes and views, they could", "are naturally attracting a considerable amount of votes and views, they could be", "academia as they claim to be. Now the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) states: > >", "of votes and views, they could be part of a scheme to game", "votes in 8 days; closed as a duplicate. These questions are about extraordinary", "questions are about extraordinary stories (which are thus likely to attract viewers and", "states: > > You should only ask practical […] questions based on actual", "credit for his own extraordinary paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734) – 269 views and +9/−0 votes in", "to take credit for his own extraordinary paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734) – 269 views and +9/−0", "* [Student doesn't want to take credit for his own extraordinary paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734) –", "plausibilty. In both example cases, there are some details which are fishy and", "> You should only ask practical […] questions based on actual problems that", "as familiar with academia as they claim to be. Now the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask)", "fishy and leave the impression that the asker is not really as familiar", "as they claim to be. Now the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) states: > > You", "naturally attracting a considerable amount of votes and views, they could be part", "game the system. On the other hand, it’s impossible to determine with high", "his own extraordinary paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734) – 269 views and +9/−0 votes in 11 hours.", "face. > > > which would make these questions officially closeworthy, if the", "questions officially closeworthy, if the situations are indeed made up. Also, as these", "the other hand, it’s impossible to determine with high confidence whether these situations", "made up. Also, as these questions are naturally attracting a considerable amount of", "What should we do about such questions? * If we should close them,", "These questions are about extraordinary stories (which are thus likely to attract viewers", "familiar with academia as they claim to be. Now the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) states:", "Now the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) states: > > You should only ask practical […]", "in 11 hours. * [My paper was too revolutionary - reviewers at a", "– 3141 views and +15/−8 votes in 8 days; closed as a duplicate.", "closed as a duplicate. These questions are about extraordinary stories (which are thus", "it \"by simply reading the title\". What now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734) – 3141 views and +15/−8", "now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734) – 3141 views and +15/−8 votes in 8 days; closed as a", "claim to be. Now the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) states: > > You should only", "- reviewers at a top journal rejected it \"by simply reading the title\".", "with academia as they claim to be. Now the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) states: >", "the asker is not really as familiar with academia as they claim to", "impossible to determine with high confidence whether these situations are really made up.", "should close them, what is a good way to determine the plausibility threshold?", "duplicate. These questions are about extraordinary stories (which are thus likely to attract", "[My paper was too revolutionary - reviewers at a top journal rejected it", "edge of plausibilty. In both example cases, there are some details which are", "I ask: * What should we do about such questions? * If we", "a considerable amount of votes and views, they could be part of a", "at least on the edge of plausibilty. In both example cases, there are", "doesn't want to take credit for his own extraordinary paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734) – 269 views", "be part of a scheme to game the system. On the other hand,", "are about extraordinary stories (which are thus likely to attract viewers and votes)", "on actual problems that you face. > > > which would make these", "leave the impression that the asker is not really as familiar with academia", "asker is not really as familiar with academia as they claim to be.", "scheme to game the system. On the other hand, it’s impossible to determine", "ask practical […] questions based on actual problems that you face. > >", "if the situations are indeed made up. Also, as these questions are naturally", "What now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734) – 3141 views and +15/−8 votes in 8 days; closed as", "which are fishy and leave the impression that the asker is not really", "Also, as these questions are naturally attracting a considerable amount of votes and", "extraordinary stories (which are thus likely to attract viewers and votes) that are", "viewers and votes) that are at least on the edge of plausibilty. In", "make these questions officially closeworthy, if the situations are indeed made up. Also,", "in 8 days; closed as a duplicate. These questions are about extraordinary stories", "a scheme to game the system. On the other hand, it’s impossible to", "up. Thus I ask: * What should we do about such questions? *", "questions? * If we should close them, what is a good way to", "situations are really made up. Thus I ask: * What should we do", "likely to attract viewers and votes) that are at least on the edge", "8 days; closed as a duplicate. These questions are about extraordinary stories (which", "be. Now the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) states: > > You should only ask practical", "least on the edge of plausibilty. In both example cases, there are some", "votes and views, they could be part of a scheme to game the", "these situations are really made up. Thus I ask: * What should we", "> > You should only ask practical […] questions based on actual problems", "own extraordinary paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734) – 269 views and +9/−0 votes in 11 hours. *", "+15/−8 votes in 8 days; closed as a duplicate. These questions are about", "indeed made up. Also, as these questions are naturally attracting a considerable amount", "about extraordinary stories (which are thus likely to attract viewers and votes) that", "the edge of plausibilty. In both example cases, there are some details which", "should only ask practical […] questions based on actual problems that you face.", "determine with high confidence whether these situations are really made up. Thus I", "– 269 views and +9/−0 votes in 11 hours. * [My paper was", "269 views and +9/−0 votes in 11 hours. * [My paper was too", "+9/−0 votes in 11 hours. * [My paper was too revolutionary - reviewers", "should we do about such questions? * If we should close them, what", "[Student doesn't want to take credit for his own extraordinary paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734) – 269", "rejected it \"by simply reading the title\". What now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734) – 3141 views and", "* If we should close them, what is a good way to determine", "some details which are fishy and leave the impression that the asker is", "cases, there are some details which are fishy and leave the impression that", "a duplicate. These questions are about extraordinary stories (which are thus likely to", "that you face. > > > which would make these questions officially closeworthy,", "You should only ask practical […] questions based on actual problems that you", "are some details which are fishy and leave the impression that the asker", "to attract viewers and votes) that are at least on the edge of", "impression that the asker is not really as familiar with academia as they", "example: * [Student doesn't want to take credit for his own extraordinary paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734)", "was too revolutionary - reviewers at a top journal rejected it \"by simply", "[…] questions based on actual problems that you face. > > > which", "take credit for his own extraordinary paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734) – 269 views and +9/−0 votes", "If we should close them, what is a good way to determine the", "with high confidence whether these situations are really made up. Thus I ask:", "we should close them, what is a good way to determine the plausibility", "such questions? * If we should close them, what is a good way", "only ask practical […] questions based on actual problems that you face. >", "3141 views and +15/−8 votes in 8 days; closed as a duplicate. These", "both example cases, there are some details which are fishy and leave the", "do about such questions? * If we should close them, what is a", "are indeed made up. Also, as these questions are naturally attracting a considerable", "confidence whether these situations are really made up. Thus I ask: * What", "center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) states: > > You should only ask practical […] questions based on", "would make these questions officially closeworthy, if the situations are indeed made up.", "is not really as familiar with academia as they claim to be. Now", "extraordinary paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734) – 269 views and +9/−0 votes in 11 hours. * [My", "amount of votes and views, they could be part of a scheme to", "> which would make these questions officially closeworthy, if the situations are indeed", "system. On the other hand, it’s impossible to determine with high confidence whether", "ask: * What should we do about such questions? * If we should", "the title\". What now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734) – 3141 views and +15/−8 votes in 8 days;", "paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734) – 269 views and +9/−0 votes in 11 hours. * [My paper", "on the edge of plausibilty. In both example cases, there are some details", "are thus likely to attract viewers and votes) that are at least on", "at a top journal rejected it \"by simply reading the title\". What now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734)", "for his own extraordinary paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734) – 269 views and +9/−0 votes in 11", "top journal rejected it \"by simply reading the title\". What now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734) – 3141", "votes in 11 hours. * [My paper was too revolutionary - reviewers at", "hours. * [My paper was too revolutionary - reviewers at a top journal", "days; closed as a duplicate. These questions are about extraordinary stories (which are", "as a duplicate. These questions are about extraordinary stories (which are thus likely", "to determine with high confidence whether these situations are really made up. Thus", "really made up. Thus I ask: * What should we do about such", "reading the title\". What now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734) – 3141 views and +15/−8 votes in 8", "they claim to be. Now the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) states: > > You should", "title\". What now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734) – 3141 views and +15/−8 votes in 8 days; closed", "not really as familiar with academia as they claim to be. Now the", "considerable amount of votes and views, they could be part of a scheme", "For example: * [Student doesn't want to take credit for his own extraordinary", "want to take credit for his own extraordinary paper](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59403/7734) – 269 views and", "* What should we do about such questions? * If we should close", "simply reading the title\". What now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734) – 3141 views and +15/−8 votes in", "example cases, there are some details which are fishy and leave the impression", "could be part of a scheme to game the system. On the other", "really as familiar with academia as they claim to be. Now the [help", "to game the system. On the other hand, it’s impossible to determine with", "they could be part of a scheme to game the system. On the", "about such questions? * If we should close them, what is a good", "journal rejected it \"by simply reading the title\". What now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734) – 3141 views", "that the asker is not really as familiar with academia as they claim", "problems that you face. > > > which would make these questions officially", "and votes) that are at least on the edge of plausibilty. In both", "of plausibilty. In both example cases, there are some details which are fishy", "made up. Thus I ask: * What should we do about such questions?", "stories (which are thus likely to attract viewers and votes) that are at", "the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) states: > > You should only ask practical […] questions", "other hand, it’s impossible to determine with high confidence whether these situations are", "hand, it’s impossible to determine with high confidence whether these situations are really", "In both example cases, there are some details which are fishy and leave", "the system. On the other hand, it’s impossible to determine with high confidence", "a top journal rejected it \"by simply reading the title\". What now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734) –", "* [My paper was too revolutionary - reviewers at a top journal rejected", "revolutionary - reviewers at a top journal rejected it \"by simply reading the", "that are at least on the edge of plausibilty. In both example cases,", "are at least on the edge of plausibilty. In both example cases, there", "practical […] questions based on actual problems that you face. > > >", "as these questions are naturally attracting a considerable amount of votes and views,", "and +9/−0 votes in 11 hours. * [My paper was too revolutionary -", "views, they could be part of a scheme to game the system. On", "there are some details which are fishy and leave the impression that the", "paper was too revolutionary - reviewers at a top journal rejected it \"by", "and leave the impression that the asker is not really as familiar with", "views and +9/−0 votes in 11 hours. * [My paper was too revolutionary", "officially closeworthy, if the situations are indeed made up. Also, as these questions", "the impression that the asker is not really as familiar with academia as", "up. Also, as these questions are naturally attracting a considerable amount of votes", "these questions officially closeworthy, if the situations are indeed made up. Also, as", "we do about such questions? * If we should close them, what is", "you face. > > > which would make these questions officially closeworthy, if", "actual problems that you face. > > > which would make these questions", "On the other hand, it’s impossible to determine with high confidence whether these", "Thus I ask: * What should we do about such questions? * If", "of a scheme to game the system. On the other hand, it’s impossible", "11 hours. * [My paper was too revolutionary - reviewers at a top", "> > which would make these questions officially closeworthy, if the situations are", "the situations are indeed made up. Also, as these questions are naturally attracting", "based on actual problems that you face. > > > which would make", "\"by simply reading the title\". What now?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/58929/7734) – 3141 views and +15/−8 votes", "too revolutionary - reviewers at a top journal rejected it \"by simply reading", "details which are fishy and leave the impression that the asker is not", "high confidence whether these situations are really made up. Thus I ask: *", "whether these situations are really made up. Thus I ask: * What should", "> > > which would make these questions officially closeworthy, if the situations", "are really made up. Thus I ask: * What should we do about", "attracting a considerable amount of votes and views, they could be part of", "[help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) states: > > You should only ask practical […] questions based", "and views, they could be part of a scheme to game the system.", "votes) that are at least on the edge of plausibilty. In both example" ]
[ "title back, that person will just un-roll it -- and then where will", "some cases our previously proposed method which uses 2 images gives inaccurate results", "and its associated clarifying comments. But I don't know how to flag the", "just un-roll it -- and then where will we be? The OP wrote,", "the OP's question: \"Can I write a paper on a method that is", "believe is an inaccurate expression of the OP's question: \"Can I write a", "that is novel but yields similar results compared to existing methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)), someone edited", "that if I roll the title back, that person will just un-roll it", "The person who made the edit meant well, I believe, attempting to help", "to the previous approach which used two images. However, the person who edited", "open by making the question more general. But I see nothing anywhere in", "merit of a question, or judgment about matters mentioned in the question and", "the edit meant well, I believe, attempting to help the OP keep the", "introduce one's judgment about the merit of a question, or judgment about matters", "its associated clarifying comments. But I don't know how to flag the comment.", "the discussion I have had with the person who made the edit, I", "the merit of a question, or judgment about matters mentioned in the question", "paper on a method that is worse than existing ones?\" The original title", "on a method that is novel but yields similar results compared to existing", "method which uses 2 images gives inaccurate results compared to 3 image solution.\"", "where will we be? The OP wrote, \"In some cases our previously proposed", "discussion I have had with the person who made the edit, I anticipate", "person who made the edit, I anticipate that if I roll the title", "a problem which uses 3 images instead of 2 images approach discussed in", "the OP sees the new method as mildly superior to the previous approach", "title was \"Can I write a paper to solve a problem which uses", "approach which used two images. However, the person who edited the title created", "the OP wanted to write a paper on a method that is ***worse***", "by the question. How do I flag this? From the discussion I have", "of a question, or judgment about matters mentioned in the question and its", "However, the person who edited the title created the following title, which I", "paper on a method that is novel but yields similar results compared to", "is ***worse*** than existing ones. I don't think one should introduce one's judgment", "had with the person who made the edit, I anticipate that if I", "OP sees the new method as mildly superior to the previous approach which", "the title created the following title, which I believe is an inaccurate expression", "the title back, that person will just un-roll it -- and then where", "of the OP's question: \"Can I write a paper on a method that", "introduced the word \"wrong\" which I believe was entirely unwarranted by the question.", "instead of 2 images approach discussed in literature?\" The person who made the", "to 3 image solution.\" Clearly, the OP sees the new method as mildly", "if I roll the title back, that person will just un-roll it --", "image solution.\" Clearly, the OP sees the new method as mildly superior to", "who edited the title created the following title, which I believe is an", "will we be? The OP wrote, \"In some cases our previously proposed method", "compared to 3 image solution.\" Clearly, the OP sees the new method as", "in literature?\" The person who made the edit meant well, I believe, attempting", "keep the question open by making the question more general. But I see", "nothing anywhere in the thread to suggest that the OP wanted to write", "matters mentioned in the question and its associated clarifying comments. But I don't", "unwarranted by the question. How do I flag this? From the discussion I", "well, I believe, attempting to help the OP keep the question open by", "\"In some cases our previously proposed method which uses 2 images gives inaccurate", "question and its associated clarifying comments. But I don't know how to flag", "previously proposed method which uses 2 images gives inaccurate results compared to 3", "wrote, \"In some cases our previously proposed method which uses 2 images gives", "of 2 images approach discussed in literature?\" The person who made the edit", "In a question ([Can I write a paper on a method that is", "entirely unwarranted by the question. How do I flag this? From the discussion", "solution.\" Clearly, the OP sees the new method as mildly superior to the", "should introduce one's judgment about the merit of a question, or judgment about", "question, or judgment about matters mentioned in the question and its associated clarifying", "about matters mentioned in the question and its associated clarifying comments. But I", "expression of the OP's question: \"Can I write a paper on a method", "which uses 2 images gives inaccurate results compared to 3 image solution.\" Clearly,", "3 image solution.\" Clearly, the OP sees the new method as mildly superior", "that the OP wanted to write a paper on a method that is", "the question more general. But I see nothing anywhere in the thread to", "be? The OP wrote, \"In some cases our previously proposed method which uses", "new method as mildly superior to the previous approach which used two images.", "to solve a problem which uses 3 images instead of 2 images approach", "the thread to suggest that the OP wanted to write a paper on", "previous approach which used two images. However, the person who edited the title", "paper on a method that is ***worse*** than existing ones. I don't think", "to existing methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)), someone edited the title and introduced the word \"wrong\" which", "our previously proposed method which uses 2 images gives inaccurate results compared to", "which I believe is an inaccurate expression of the OP's question: \"Can I", "meant well, I believe, attempting to help the OP keep the question open", "created the following title, which I believe is an inaccurate expression of the", "title created the following title, which I believe is an inaccurate expression of", "following title, which I believe is an inaccurate expression of the OP's question:", "a question ([Can I write a paper on a method that is novel", "making the question more general. But I see nothing anywhere in the thread", "general. But I see nothing anywhere in the thread to suggest that the", "a question, or judgment about matters mentioned in the question and its associated", "thread to suggest that the OP wanted to write a paper on a", "edited the title and introduced the word \"wrong\" which I believe was entirely", "compared to existing methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)), someone edited the title and introduced the word \"wrong\"", "write a paper on a method that is worse than existing ones?\" The", "OP wrote, \"In some cases our previously proposed method which uses 2 images", "title and introduced the word \"wrong\" which I believe was entirely unwarranted by", "the OP keep the question open by making the question more general. But", "back, that person will just un-roll it -- and then where will we", "OP keep the question open by making the question more general. But I", "an inaccurate expression of the OP's question: \"Can I write a paper on", "discussed in literature?\" The person who made the edit meant well, I believe,", "approach discussed in literature?\" The person who made the edit meant well, I", "a paper on a method that is worse than existing ones?\" The original", "\"wrong\" which I believe was entirely unwarranted by the question. How do I", "who made the edit meant well, I believe, attempting to help the OP", "question. How do I flag this? From the discussion I have had with", "method that is worse than existing ones?\" The original title was \"Can I", "attempting to help the OP keep the question open by making the question", "-- and then where will we be? The OP wrote, \"In some cases", "do I flag this? From the discussion I have had with the person", "worse than existing ones?\" The original title was \"Can I write a paper", "solve a problem which uses 3 images instead of 2 images approach discussed", "suggest that the OP wanted to write a paper on a method that", "2 images gives inaccurate results compared to 3 image solution.\" Clearly, the OP", "than existing ones?\" The original title was \"Can I write a paper to", "write a paper to solve a problem which uses 3 images instead of", "more general. But I see nothing anywhere in the thread to suggest that", "word \"wrong\" which I believe was entirely unwarranted by the question. How do", "and then where will we be? The OP wrote, \"In some cases our", "than existing ones. I don't think one should introduce one's judgment about the", "I write a paper on a method that is novel but yields similar", "literature?\" The person who made the edit meant well, I believe, attempting to", "I anticipate that if I roll the title back, that person will just", "anticipate that if I roll the title back, that person will just un-roll", "OP wanted to write a paper on a method that is ***worse*** than", "believe, attempting to help the OP keep the question open by making the", "judgment about the merit of a question, or judgment about matters mentioned in", "I flag this? From the discussion I have had with the person who", "by making the question more general. But I see nothing anywhere in the", "to suggest that the OP wanted to write a paper on a method", "the edit, I anticipate that if I roll the title back, that person", "images. However, the person who edited the title created the following title, which", "a paper to solve a problem which uses 3 images instead of 2", "which uses 3 images instead of 2 images approach discussed in literature?\" The", "with the person who made the edit, I anticipate that if I roll", "How do I flag this? From the discussion I have had with the", "made the edit, I anticipate that if I roll the title back, that", "that person will just un-roll it -- and then where will we be?", "([Can I write a paper on a method that is novel but yields", "proposed method which uses 2 images gives inaccurate results compared to 3 image", "one should introduce one's judgment about the merit of a question, or judgment", "to help the OP keep the question open by making the question more", "I believe is an inaccurate expression of the OP's question: \"Can I write", "in the question and its associated clarifying comments. But I don't know how", "a method that is novel but yields similar results compared to existing methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)),", "two images. However, the person who edited the title created the following title,", "results compared to existing methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)), someone edited the title and introduced the word", "on a method that is worse than existing ones?\" The original title was", "yields similar results compared to existing methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)), someone edited the title and introduced", "un-roll it -- and then where will we be? The OP wrote, \"In", "gives inaccurate results compared to 3 image solution.\" Clearly, the OP sees the", "paper to solve a problem which uses 3 images instead of 2 images", "a method that is worse than existing ones?\" The original title was \"Can", "one's judgment about the merit of a question, or judgment about matters mentioned", "methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)), someone edited the title and introduced the word \"wrong\" which I believe", "I write a paper on a method that is worse than existing ones?\"", "sees the new method as mildly superior to the previous approach which used", "Clearly, the OP sees the new method as mildly superior to the previous", "the person who edited the title created the following title, which I believe", "judgment about matters mentioned in the question and its associated clarifying comments. But", "it -- and then where will we be? The OP wrote, \"In some", "original title was \"Can I write a paper to solve a problem which", "From the discussion I have had with the person who made the edit,", "I see nothing anywhere in the thread to suggest that the OP wanted", "flag this? From the discussion I have had with the person who made", "\"Can I write a paper to solve a problem which uses 3 images", "3 images instead of 2 images approach discussed in literature?\" The person who", "the question. How do I flag this? From the discussion I have had", "that is ***worse*** than existing ones. I don't think one should introduce one's", "The OP wrote, \"In some cases our previously proposed method which uses 2", "but yields similar results compared to existing methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)), someone edited the title and", "as mildly superior to the previous approach which used two images. However, the", "I believe was entirely unwarranted by the question. How do I flag this?", "believe was entirely unwarranted by the question. How do I flag this? From", "edit meant well, I believe, attempting to help the OP keep the question", "the person who made the edit, I anticipate that if I roll the", "similar results compared to existing methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)), someone edited the title and introduced the", "the title and introduced the word \"wrong\" which I believe was entirely unwarranted", "results compared to 3 image solution.\" Clearly, the OP sees the new method", "question: \"Can I write a paper on a method that is worse than", "edit, I anticipate that if I roll the title back, that person will", "used two images. However, the person who edited the title created the following", "who made the edit, I anticipate that if I roll the title back,", "***worse*** than existing ones. I don't think one should introduce one's judgment about", "will just un-roll it -- and then where will we be? The OP", "the question and its associated clarifying comments. But I don't know how to", "think one should introduce one's judgment about the merit of a question, or", "I roll the title back, that person will just un-roll it -- and", "person will just un-roll it -- and then where will we be? The", "I believe, attempting to help the OP keep the question open by making", "is novel but yields similar results compared to existing methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)), someone edited the", "uses 2 images gives inaccurate results compared to 3 image solution.\" Clearly, the", "see nothing anywhere in the thread to suggest that the OP wanted to", "a method that is ***worse*** than existing ones. I don't think one should", "images instead of 2 images approach discussed in literature?\" The person who made", "the following title, which I believe is an inaccurate expression of the OP's", "images approach discussed in literature?\" The person who made the edit meant well,", "the previous approach which used two images. However, the person who edited the", "existing ones. I don't think one should introduce one's judgment about the merit", "a paper on a method that is novel but yields similar results compared", "roll the title back, that person will just un-roll it -- and then", "I write a paper to solve a problem which uses 3 images instead", "method that is ***worse*** than existing ones. I don't think one should introduce", "in the thread to suggest that the OP wanted to write a paper", "2 images approach discussed in literature?\" The person who made the edit meant", "uses 3 images instead of 2 images approach discussed in literature?\" The person", "existing methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)), someone edited the title and introduced the word \"wrong\" which I", "is an inaccurate expression of the OP's question: \"Can I write a paper", "don't think one should introduce one's judgment about the merit of a question,", "mentioned in the question and its associated clarifying comments. But I don't know", "mildly superior to the previous approach which used two images. However, the person", "this? From the discussion I have had with the person who made the", "help the OP keep the question open by making the question more general.", "have had with the person who made the edit, I anticipate that if", "made the edit meant well, I believe, attempting to help the OP keep", "anywhere in the thread to suggest that the OP wanted to write a", "question ([Can I write a paper on a method that is novel but", "edited the title created the following title, which I believe is an inaccurate", "method that is novel but yields similar results compared to existing methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)), someone", "problem which uses 3 images instead of 2 images approach discussed in literature?\"", "But I see nothing anywhere in the thread to suggest that the OP", "which I believe was entirely unwarranted by the question. How do I flag", "question open by making the question more general. But I see nothing anywhere", "images gives inaccurate results compared to 3 image solution.\" Clearly, the OP sees", "title, which I believe is an inaccurate expression of the OP's question: \"Can", "is worse than existing ones?\" The original title was \"Can I write a", "on a method that is ***worse*** than existing ones. I don't think one", "superior to the previous approach which used two images. However, the person who", "to write a paper on a method that is ***worse*** than existing ones.", "cases our previously proposed method which uses 2 images gives inaccurate results compared", "about the merit of a question, or judgment about matters mentioned in the", "then where will we be? The OP wrote, \"In some cases our previously", "question more general. But I see nothing anywhere in the thread to suggest", "ones. I don't think one should introduce one's judgment about the merit of", "someone edited the title and introduced the word \"wrong\" which I believe was", "OP's question: \"Can I write a paper on a method that is worse", "write a paper on a method that is novel but yields similar results", "existing ones?\" The original title was \"Can I write a paper to solve", "I don't think one should introduce one's judgment about the merit of a", "novel but yields similar results compared to existing methods?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/59389/can-i-write-a-paper-on-a-method-that-is-worse-than-existing-ones)), someone edited the title", "was \"Can I write a paper to solve a problem which uses 3", "we be? The OP wrote, \"In some cases our previously proposed method which", "ones?\" The original title was \"Can I write a paper to solve a", "the question open by making the question more general. But I see nothing", "person who made the edit meant well, I believe, attempting to help the", "a paper on a method that is ***worse*** than existing ones. I don't", "the new method as mildly superior to the previous approach which used two", "method as mildly superior to the previous approach which used two images. However,", "person who edited the title created the following title, which I believe is", "was entirely unwarranted by the question. How do I flag this? From the", "inaccurate results compared to 3 image solution.\" Clearly, the OP sees the new", "or judgment about matters mentioned in the question and its associated clarifying comments.", "wanted to write a paper on a method that is ***worse*** than existing", "\"Can I write a paper on a method that is worse than existing", "write a paper on a method that is ***worse*** than existing ones. I", "I have had with the person who made the edit, I anticipate that", "that is worse than existing ones?\" The original title was \"Can I write", "and introduced the word \"wrong\" which I believe was entirely unwarranted by the", "inaccurate expression of the OP's question: \"Can I write a paper on a", "which used two images. However, the person who edited the title created the", "The original title was \"Can I write a paper to solve a problem", "the word \"wrong\" which I believe was entirely unwarranted by the question. How" ]
[ "> This is leaving aside the spamming problems that Lefd alludes to. –", "post your data set on a site that spams its user base. –", "commercial company with no clear method so far for making money. At some", "ResearchGate are a commercial company with no clear method so far for making", "you do there, and it'll be a mess; there's no > guarantee that", "actually an old ResearchGate question about this suggestion. > – agold yesterday >", "to open special topic about Researchgate, and to discuss about this problems? Examples:", "you explain more about the spamming, I'm intrigued to know. – Ébe Iseec", "yesterday > > > Why would you prefer ResearchGate? They have a terrible", "on a site that spams its user base. – LefdE yesterday > >", "they're going to make a grab and try > to monetise whatever you", "and to discuss about this problems? Examples: > > There is actually an", "spamming problems that Lefd alludes to. – > Intrej yesterday > > >", "that your content will remain there or remain accessible. > This is leaving", "No. No, no, no, no, no. Absolutely not. Do not post your data", "ResearchGate? They have a terrible reputation for shadiness and spamming. – MLefdryes yesterday", "site that spams its user base. – LefdE yesterday > > > @LefdE:", "make a grab and try > to monetise whatever you do there, and", "not. Do not post your data set on a site that spams its", "clear method so far for making money. At some point, they're going to", "or remain accessible. > This is leaving aside the spamming problems that Lefd", "Examples: > > There is actually an old ResearchGate question about this suggestion.", "company with no clear method so far for making money. At some point,", "more about the spamming, I'm intrigued to know. – Ébe Iseec yesterday 2", "> > > ResearchGate are a commercial company with no clear method so", "far for making money. At some point, they're going to make a grab", "Some members expressed concerns and criticized RG network, is it alowed to open", "a site that spams its user base. – LefdE yesterday > > >", "monetise whatever you do there, and it'll be a mess; there's no >", "LefdE yesterday > > > @LefdE: Could you explain more about the spamming,", "so far for making money. At some point, they're going to make a", "is actually an old ResearchGate question about this suggestion. > – agold yesterday", "> > ResearchGate are a commercial company with no clear method so far", "network, is it alowed to open special topic about Researchgate, and to discuss", "explain more about the spamming, I'm intrigued to know. – Ébe Iseec yesterday", "> > @LefdE: Could you explain more about the spamming, I'm intrigued to", "your content will remain there or remain accessible. > This is leaving aside", "user base. – LefdE yesterday > > > @LefdE: Could you explain more", "about Researchgate, and to discuss about this problems? Examples: > > There is", "MLefdryes yesterday 1 > > > No. No, no, no, no, no. Absolutely", "money. At some point, they're going to make a grab and try >", "the spamming, I'm intrigued to know. – Ébe Iseec yesterday 2 > >", "the spamming problems that Lefd alludes to. – > Intrej yesterday > >", "> @LefdE: Could you explain more about the spamming, I'm intrigued to know.", "spamming. – MLefdryes yesterday 1 > > > No. No, no, no, no,", "> > > Why would you prefer ResearchGate? They have a terrible reputation", "there, and it'll be a mess; there's no > guarantee that your content", "expressed concerns and criticized RG network, is it alowed to open special topic", "> > Why would you prefer ResearchGate? They have a terrible reputation for", "to make a grab and try > to monetise whatever you do there,", "prefer ResearchGate? They have a terrible reputation for shadiness and spamming. – MLefdryes", "it'll be a mess; there's no > guarantee that your content will remain", "intrigued to know. – Ébe Iseec yesterday 2 > > > ResearchGate are", "Ébe Iseec yesterday 2 > > > ResearchGate are a commercial company with", "are a commercial company with no clear method so far for making money.", "you prefer ResearchGate? They have a terrible reputation for shadiness and spamming. –", "Absolutely not. Do not post your data set on a site that spams", "RG network, is it alowed to open special topic about Researchgate, and to", "a terrible reputation for shadiness and spamming. – MLefdryes yesterday 1 > >", "about this problems? Examples: > > There is actually an old ResearchGate question", "No, no, no, no, no. Absolutely not. Do not post your data set", "going to make a grab and try > to monetise whatever you do", "> No. No, no, no, no, no. Absolutely not. Do not post your", "yesterday > > > @LefdE: Could you explain more about the spamming, I'm", "to know. – Ébe Iseec yesterday 2 > > > ResearchGate are a", "> There is actually an old ResearchGate question about this suggestion. > –", "not post your data set on a site that spams its user base.", "– agold yesterday > > > Why would you prefer ResearchGate? They have", "spams its user base. – LefdE yesterday > > > @LefdE: Could you", "leaving aside the spamming problems that Lefd alludes to. – > Intrej yesterday", "there or remain accessible. > This is leaving aside the spamming problems that", "There is actually an old ResearchGate question about this suggestion. > – agold", "Researchgate, and to discuss about this problems? Examples: > > There is actually", "and spamming. – MLefdryes yesterday 1 > > > No. No, no, no,", "– LefdE yesterday > > > @LefdE: Could you explain more about the", "know. – Ébe Iseec yesterday 2 > > > ResearchGate are a commercial", "no > guarantee that your content will remain there or remain accessible. >", "aside the spamming problems that Lefd alludes to. – > Intrej yesterday >", "yesterday 2 > > > ResearchGate are a commercial company with no clear", "to monetise whatever you do there, and it'll be a mess; there's no", "this problems? Examples: > > There is actually an old ResearchGate question about", "old ResearchGate question about this suggestion. > – agold yesterday > > >", "question about this suggestion. > – agold yesterday > > > Why would", "Why would you prefer ResearchGate? They have a terrible reputation for shadiness and", "remain accessible. > This is leaving aside the spamming problems that Lefd alludes", "mess; there's no > guarantee that your content will remain there or remain", "and criticized RG network, is it alowed to open special topic about Researchgate,", "no. Absolutely not. Do not post your data set on a site that", "This is leaving aside the spamming problems that Lefd alludes to. – >", "and it'll be a mess; there's no > guarantee that your content will", "do there, and it'll be a mess; there's no > guarantee that your", "Do not post your data set on a site that spams its user", "for shadiness and spamming. – MLefdryes yesterday 1 > > > No. No,", "some point, they're going to make a grab and try > to monetise", "about the spamming, I'm intrigued to know. – Ébe Iseec yesterday 2 >", "spamming, I'm intrigued to know. – Ébe Iseec yesterday 2 > > >", "> to monetise whatever you do there, and it'll be a mess; there's", "making money. At some point, they're going to make a grab and try", "terrible reputation for shadiness and spamming. – MLefdryes yesterday 1 > > >", "set on a site that spams its user base. – LefdE yesterday >", "a commercial company with no clear method so far for making money. At", "would you prefer ResearchGate? They have a terrible reputation for shadiness and spamming.", "At some point, they're going to make a grab and try > to", "grab and try > to monetise whatever you do there, and it'll be", "have a terrible reputation for shadiness and spamming. – MLefdryes yesterday 1 >", "content will remain there or remain accessible. > This is leaving aside the", "Iseec yesterday 2 > > > ResearchGate are a commercial company with no", "1 > > > No. No, no, no, no, no. Absolutely not. Do", "guarantee that your content will remain there or remain accessible. > This is", "concerns and criticized RG network, is it alowed to open special topic about", "try > to monetise whatever you do there, and it'll be a mess;", "> > No. No, no, no, no, no. Absolutely not. Do not post", "problems? Examples: > > There is actually an old ResearchGate question about this", "– Ébe Iseec yesterday 2 > > > ResearchGate are a commercial company", "> > > @LefdE: Could you explain more about the spamming, I'm intrigued", "about this suggestion. > – agold yesterday > > > Why would you", "open special topic about Researchgate, and to discuss about this problems? Examples: >", "that spams its user base. – LefdE yesterday > > > @LefdE: Could", "base. – LefdE yesterday > > > @LefdE: Could you explain more about", "2 > > > ResearchGate are a commercial company with no clear method", "is leaving aside the spamming problems that Lefd alludes to. – > Intrej", "whatever you do there, and it'll be a mess; there's no > guarantee", "a mess; there's no > guarantee that your content will remain there or", "> > There is actually an old ResearchGate question about this suggestion. >", "Could you explain more about the spamming, I'm intrigued to know. – Ébe", "method so far for making money. At some point, they're going to make", "> guarantee that your content will remain there or remain accessible. > This", "your data set on a site that spams its user base. – LefdE", "a grab and try > to monetise whatever you do there, and it'll", "special topic about Researchgate, and to discuss about this problems? Examples: > >", "to discuss about this problems? Examples: > > There is actually an old", "members expressed concerns and criticized RG network, is it alowed to open special", "topic about Researchgate, and to discuss about this problems? Examples: > > There", "for making money. At some point, they're going to make a grab and", "accessible. > This is leaving aside the spamming problems that Lefd alludes to.", "agold yesterday > > > Why would you prefer ResearchGate? They have a", "ResearchGate question about this suggestion. > – agold yesterday > > > Why", "– MLefdryes yesterday 1 > > > No. No, no, no, no, no.", "reputation for shadiness and spamming. – MLefdryes yesterday 1 > > > No.", "no, no. Absolutely not. Do not post your data set on a site", "no clear method so far for making money. At some point, they're going", "> Why would you prefer ResearchGate? They have a terrible reputation for shadiness", "no, no, no, no. Absolutely not. Do not post your data set on", "@LefdE: Could you explain more about the spamming, I'm intrigued to know. –", "I'm intrigued to know. – Ébe Iseec yesterday 2 > > > ResearchGate", "will remain there or remain accessible. > This is leaving aside the spamming", "is it alowed to open special topic about Researchgate, and to discuss about", "this suggestion. > – agold yesterday > > > Why would you prefer", "> – agold yesterday > > > Why would you prefer ResearchGate? They", "They have a terrible reputation for shadiness and spamming. – MLefdryes yesterday 1", "> ResearchGate are a commercial company with no clear method so far for", "no, no, no. Absolutely not. Do not post your data set on a", "criticized RG network, is it alowed to open special topic about Researchgate, and", "remain there or remain accessible. > This is leaving aside the spamming problems", "shadiness and spamming. – MLefdryes yesterday 1 > > > No. No, no,", "and try > to monetise whatever you do there, and it'll be a", "discuss about this problems? Examples: > > There is actually an old ResearchGate", "alowed to open special topic about Researchgate, and to discuss about this problems?", "> > > No. No, no, no, no, no. Absolutely not. Do not", "point, they're going to make a grab and try > to monetise whatever", "be a mess; there's no > guarantee that your content will remain there", "its user base. – LefdE yesterday > > > @LefdE: Could you explain", "suggestion. > – agold yesterday > > > Why would you prefer ResearchGate?", "an old ResearchGate question about this suggestion. > – agold yesterday > >", "there's no > guarantee that your content will remain there or remain accessible.", "yesterday 1 > > > No. No, no, no, no, no. Absolutely not.", "data set on a site that spams its user base. – LefdE yesterday", "with no clear method so far for making money. At some point, they're", "it alowed to open special topic about Researchgate, and to discuss about this" ]
[ "dismissal from PhD in graduate application be listed as academic misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341) I find", "it. Should I delete the whole part to make the question short and", "answers don't use it. Should I delete the whole part to make the", "graduate application be listed as academic misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341) I find the background part in", "Should I delete the whole part to make the question short and to", "doesn't give useful information, or at least the answers don't use it. Should", "academic misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341) I find the background part in this question doesn't give useful", "useful information, or at least the answers don't use it. Should I delete", "least the answers don't use it. Should I delete the whole part to", "part in this question doesn't give useful information, or at least the answers", "[Should a dismissal from PhD in graduate application be listed as academic misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341)", "use it. Should I delete the whole part to make the question short", "don't use it. Should I delete the whole part to make the question", "in this question doesn't give useful information, or at least the answers don't", "the background part in this question doesn't give useful information, or at least", "a dismissal from PhD in graduate application be listed as academic misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341) I", "PhD in graduate application be listed as academic misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341) I find the background", "background part in this question doesn't give useful information, or at least the", "be listed as academic misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341) I find the background part in this question", "from PhD in graduate application be listed as academic misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341) I find the", "I find the background part in this question doesn't give useful information, or", "in graduate application be listed as academic misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341) I find the background part", "this question doesn't give useful information, or at least the answers don't use", "give useful information, or at least the answers don't use it. Should I", "misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341) I find the background part in this question doesn't give useful information,", "or at least the answers don't use it. Should I delete the whole", "I delete the whole part to make the question short and to the", "question doesn't give useful information, or at least the answers don't use it.", "as academic misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341) I find the background part in this question doesn't give", "listed as academic misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341) I find the background part in this question doesn't", "at least the answers don't use it. Should I delete the whole part", "information, or at least the answers don't use it. Should I delete the", "delete the whole part to make the question short and to the point?", "the answers don't use it. Should I delete the whole part to make", "find the background part in this question doesn't give useful information, or at", "application be listed as academic misconduct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/15067/14341) I find the background part in this" ]
[ "that have the same function, however they are not set as synonyms: 1.", "are two tags that have the same function, however they are not set", "[statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose \"show questions tagged 'statement-of-purpose'\") 2. [personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement \"show questions tagged 'personal-statement'\") Should we", "Or should someone with a higher reputation than myself, set these tags as", "\"statement-of-purpose\" tag (177 questions). Or should someone with a higher reputation than myself,", "function, however they are not set as synonyms: 1. [statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose \"show questions tagged", "7 questions) with the \"statement-of-purpose\" tag (177 questions). Or should someone with a", "questions (only 7 questions) with the \"statement-of-purpose\" tag (177 questions). Or should someone", "re-tag the \"personal-statement\" questions (only 7 questions) with the \"statement-of-purpose\" tag (177 questions).", "(only 7 questions) with the \"statement-of-purpose\" tag (177 questions). Or should someone with", "the same function, however they are not set as synonyms: 1. [statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose \"show", "questions tagged 'statement-of-purpose'\") 2. [personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement \"show questions tagged 'personal-statement'\") Should we re-tag the", "have the same function, however they are not set as synonyms: 1. [statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose", "questions) with the \"statement-of-purpose\" tag (177 questions). Or should someone with a higher", "1. [statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose \"show questions tagged 'statement-of-purpose'\") 2. [personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement \"show questions tagged 'personal-statement'\") Should", "they are not set as synonyms: 1. [statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose \"show questions tagged 'statement-of-purpose'\") 2.", "synonyms: 1. [statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose \"show questions tagged 'statement-of-purpose'\") 2. [personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement \"show questions tagged 'personal-statement'\")", "'personal-statement'\") Should we re-tag the \"personal-statement\" questions (only 7 questions) with the \"statement-of-purpose\"", "questions tagged 'personal-statement'\") Should we re-tag the \"personal-statement\" questions (only 7 questions) with", "someone with a higher reputation than myself, set these tags as synonyms to", "are not set as synonyms: 1. [statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose \"show questions tagged 'statement-of-purpose'\") 2. [personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement", "should someone with a higher reputation than myself, set these tags as synonyms", "however they are not set as synonyms: 1. [statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose \"show questions tagged 'statement-of-purpose'\")", "we re-tag the \"personal-statement\" questions (only 7 questions) with the \"statement-of-purpose\" tag (177", "'statement-of-purpose'\") 2. [personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement \"show questions tagged 'personal-statement'\") Should we re-tag the \"personal-statement\" questions", "with the \"statement-of-purpose\" tag (177 questions). Or should someone with a higher reputation", "a higher reputation than myself, set these tags as synonyms to each other?", "Currently there are two tags that have the same function, however they are", "\"show questions tagged 'personal-statement'\") Should we re-tag the \"personal-statement\" questions (only 7 questions)", "tagged 'statement-of-purpose'\") 2. [personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement \"show questions tagged 'personal-statement'\") Should we re-tag the \"personal-statement\"", "as synonyms: 1. [statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose \"show questions tagged 'statement-of-purpose'\") 2. [personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement \"show questions tagged", "with a higher reputation than myself, set these tags as synonyms to each", "2. [personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement \"show questions tagged 'personal-statement'\") Should we re-tag the \"personal-statement\" questions (only", "\"show questions tagged 'statement-of-purpose'\") 2. [personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement \"show questions tagged 'personal-statement'\") Should we re-tag", "set as synonyms: 1. [statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose \"show questions tagged 'statement-of-purpose'\") 2. [personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement \"show questions", "[personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement \"show questions tagged 'personal-statement'\") Should we re-tag the \"personal-statement\" questions (only 7", "questions). Or should someone with a higher reputation than myself, set these tags", "the \"statement-of-purpose\" tag (177 questions). Or should someone with a higher reputation than", "same function, however they are not set as synonyms: 1. [statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose \"show questions", "the \"personal-statement\" questions (only 7 questions) with the \"statement-of-purpose\" tag (177 questions). Or", "tagged 'personal-statement'\") Should we re-tag the \"personal-statement\" questions (only 7 questions) with the", "two tags that have the same function, however they are not set as", "\"personal-statement\" questions (only 7 questions) with the \"statement-of-purpose\" tag (177 questions). Or should", "(177 questions). Or should someone with a higher reputation than myself, set these", "tags that have the same function, however they are not set as synonyms:", "there are two tags that have the same function, however they are not", "Should we re-tag the \"personal-statement\" questions (only 7 questions) with the \"statement-of-purpose\" tag", "not set as synonyms: 1. [statement-of-purpose](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/statement-of-purpose \"show questions tagged 'statement-of-purpose'\") 2. [personal-statement](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-statement \"show", "tag (177 questions). Or should someone with a higher reputation than myself, set" ]
[ "straight to speak, cat got my tongue and eventually point a is spoken", "topics I meet are in academic setting, I think that asking this question", "on Academia is on-topic. But I'm afraid that it may be considered to", "it may be considered to be a boat programming question. --- **Example:** say", "in my head, both a and b are thought carefully enough to the", "really take note, cat always got my tongue, even thought I know what", "this level of this problem. But it persists. [I have asked this on", "know what to say. My writing is, nonetheless, not having that problem. Is", "read about it, and I know that to successfully persuade them, I need", "I have read about it, and I know that to successfully persuade them,", "got my tongue and eventually point a is spoken in a way that", "Academia is on-topic. But I'm afraid that it may be considered to be", "coherence and get stumble when talking in thoughtful topics. Unless I really take", "not always get to this level of this problem. But it persists. [I", "a boat programming question. --- **Example:** say I need to talk about game", "to talk about game theory to persuade a speaker. I have read about", "**Example:** say I need to talk about game theory to persuade a speaker.", "a speaker. I have read about it, and I know that to successfully", "say I need to talk about game theory to persuade a speaker. I", "may be considered to be a boat programming question. --- **Example:** say I", "But it persists. [I have asked this on the big Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800), and it", "This is the extreme case, I not always get to this level of", "The body of question is the same so you can skip to the", "this problem. But it persists. [I have asked this on the big Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800),", "and get stumble when talking in thoughtful topics. Unless I really take note,", "thinking about what to talk in my head, both a and b are", "Since most thoughtful topics I meet are in academic setting, I think that", "what to say. My writing is, nonetheless, not having that problem. Is it", "the extreme case, I not always get to this level of this problem.", "Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800), and it seems that Academia is my only choice. The body of", "having that problem. Is it on-topic here? Since most thoughtful topics I meet", "about what to talk in my head, both a and b are thought", "enough to the point that I believe that they will work. However, when", "are in academic setting, I think that asking this question on Academia is", "them, I need to use point a and b. When I thinking about", "hard to understand, and I completely forgot point b. This is the extreme", "work. However, when I don't take note and get straight to speak, cat", "a is spoken in a way that it's hard to understand, and I", "know that to successfully persuade them, I need to use point a and", "don't take note and get straight to speak, cat got my tongue and", "I know that to successfully persuade them, I need to use point a", "will work. However, when I don't take note and get straight to speak,", "I completely forgot point b. This is the extreme case, I not always", "asked this on the big Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800), and it seems that Academia is my", "head, both a and b are thought carefully enough to the point that", "and I completely forgot point b. This is the extreme case, I not", "persists. [I have asked this on the big Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800), and it seems that", "understand, and I completely forgot point b. This is the extreme case, I", "and it seems that Academia is my only choice. The body of question", "to be a boat programming question. --- **Example:** say I need to talk", "and b are thought carefully enough to the point that I believe that", "and get straight to speak, cat got my tongue and eventually point a", "on-topic here? Since most thoughtful topics I meet are in academic setting, I", "that I believe that they will work. However, when I don't take note", "on-topic. But I'm afraid that it may be considered to be a boat", "to use point a and b. When I thinking about what to talk", "point a is spoken in a way that it's hard to understand, and", "get stumble when talking in thoughtful topics. Unless I really take note, cat", "Is it on-topic here? Since most thoughtful topics I meet are in academic", "this question on Academia is on-topic. But I'm afraid that it may be", "get to this level of this problem. But it persists. [I have asked", "Academia is my only choice. The body of question is the same so", "to say. My writing is, nonetheless, not having that problem. Is it on-topic", "--- **Example:** say I need to talk about game theory to persuade a", "about it, and I know that to successfully persuade them, I need to", "choice. The body of question is the same so you can skip to", "successfully persuade them, I need to use point a and b. When I", "game theory to persuade a speaker. I have read about it, and I", "is spoken in a way that it's hard to understand, and I completely", "even thought I know what to say. My writing is, nonetheless, not having", "believe that they will work. However, when I don't take note and get", "meet are in academic setting, I think that asking this question on Academia", "it on-topic here? Since most thoughtful topics I meet are in academic setting,", "be considered to be a boat programming question. --- **Example:** say I need", "only choice. The body of question is the same so you can skip", "I not always get to this level of this problem. But it persists.", "seems that Academia is my only choice. The body of question is the", "I really take note, cat always got my tongue, even thought I know", "writing is, nonetheless, not having that problem. Is it on-topic here? Since most", "have asked this on the big Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800), and it seems that Academia is", "thoughtful topics. Unless I really take note, cat always got my tongue, even", "boat programming question. --- **Example:** say I need to talk about game theory", "thought I know what to say. My writing is, nonetheless, not having that", "I don't take note and get straight to speak, cat got my tongue", "b are thought carefully enough to the point that I believe that they", "I believe that they will work. However, when I don't take note and", "that Academia is my only choice. The body of question is the same", "need to talk about game theory to persuade a speaker. I have read", "take note and get straight to speak, cat got my tongue and eventually", "But I'm afraid that it may be considered to be a boat programming", "is my only choice. The body of question is the same so you", "My writing is, nonetheless, not having that problem. Is it on-topic here? Since", "to persuade a speaker. I have read about it, and I know that", "tend to lack coherence and get stumble when talking in thoughtful topics. Unless", "be a boat programming question. --- **Example:** say I need to talk about", "a and b are thought carefully enough to the point that I believe", "my only choice. The body of question is the same so you can", "and b. When I thinking about what to talk in my head, both", "persuade a speaker. I have read about it, and I know that to", "to this level of this problem. But it persists. [I have asked this", "spoken in a way that it's hard to understand, and I completely forgot", "and I know that to successfully persuade them, I need to use point", "academic setting, I think that asking this question on Academia is on-topic. But", "programming question. --- **Example:** say I need to talk about game theory to", "theory to persuade a speaker. I have read about it, and I know", "that to successfully persuade them, I need to use point a and b.", "note and get straight to speak, cat got my tongue and eventually point", "[I have asked this on the big Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800), and it seems that Academia", "nonetheless, not having that problem. Is it on-topic here? Since most thoughtful topics", "stumble when talking in thoughtful topics. Unless I really take note, cat always", "think that asking this question on Academia is on-topic. But I'm afraid that", "have read about it, and I know that to successfully persuade them, I", "it, and I know that to successfully persuade them, I need to use", "a and b. When I thinking about what to talk in my head,", "a way that it's hard to understand, and I completely forgot point b.", "Unless I really take note, cat always got my tongue, even thought I", "it seems that Academia is my only choice. The body of question is", "asking this question on Academia is on-topic. But I'm afraid that it may", "is, nonetheless, not having that problem. Is it on-topic here? Since most thoughtful", "carefully enough to the point that I believe that they will work. However,", "in a way that it's hard to understand, and I completely forgot point", "I'm afraid that it may be considered to be a boat programming question.", "use point a and b. When I thinking about what to talk in", "that it may be considered to be a boat programming question. --- **Example:**", "always got my tongue, even thought I know what to say. My writing", "I think that asking this question on Academia is on-topic. But I'm afraid", "way that it's hard to understand, and I completely forgot point b. This", "they will work. However, when I don't take note and get straight to", "tongue and eventually point a is spoken in a way that it's hard", "point that I believe that they will work. However, when I don't take", "b. This is the extreme case, I not always get to this level", "talk in my head, both a and b are thought carefully enough to", "to successfully persuade them, I need to use point a and b. When", "in thoughtful topics. Unless I really take note, cat always got my tongue,", "However, when I don't take note and get straight to speak, cat got", "I need to use point a and b. When I thinking about what", "body of question is the same so you can skip to the answer.", "thought carefully enough to the point that I believe that they will work.", "thoughtful topics I meet are in academic setting, I think that asking this", "the big Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800), and it seems that Academia is my only choice. The", "when I don't take note and get straight to speak, cat got my", "speak, cat got my tongue and eventually point a is spoken in a", "extreme case, I not always get to this level of this problem. But", "I know what to say. My writing is, nonetheless, not having that problem.", "lack coherence and get stumble when talking in thoughtful topics. Unless I really", "always get to this level of this problem. But it persists. [I have", "to the point that I believe that they will work. However, when I", "that they will work. However, when I don't take note and get straight", "not having that problem. Is it on-topic here? Since most thoughtful topics I", "tongue, even thought I know what to say. My writing is, nonetheless, not", "cat always got my tongue, even thought I know what to say. My", "question. --- **Example:** say I need to talk about game theory to persuade", "topics. Unless I really take note, cat always got my tongue, even thought", "about game theory to persuade a speaker. I have read about it, and", "to lack coherence and get stumble when talking in thoughtful topics. Unless I", "that it's hard to understand, and I completely forgot point b. This is", "level of this problem. But it persists. [I have asked this on the", "it persists. [I have asked this on the big Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800), and it seems", "cat got my tongue and eventually point a is spoken in a way", "I thinking about what to talk in my head, both a and b", "the point that I believe that they will work. However, when I don't", "in academic setting, I think that asking this question on Academia is on-topic.", "I meet are in academic setting, I think that asking this question on", "I tend to lack coherence and get stumble when talking in thoughtful topics.", "is the extreme case, I not always get to this level of this", "talking in thoughtful topics. Unless I really take note, cat always got my", "case, I not always get to this level of this problem. But it", "got my tongue, even thought I know what to say. My writing is,", "on the big Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800), and it seems that Academia is my only choice.", "my head, both a and b are thought carefully enough to the point", "eventually point a is spoken in a way that it's hard to understand,", "problem. But it persists. [I have asked this on the big Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800), and", "I need to talk about game theory to persuade a speaker. I have", "to understand, and I completely forgot point b. This is the extreme case,", "of this problem. But it persists. [I have asked this on the big", "say. My writing is, nonetheless, not having that problem. Is it on-topic here?", "take note, cat always got my tongue, even thought I know what to", "point a and b. When I thinking about what to talk in my", "it's hard to understand, and I completely forgot point b. This is the", "most thoughtful topics I meet are in academic setting, I think that asking", "When I thinking about what to talk in my head, both a and", "persuade them, I need to use point a and b. When I thinking", "get straight to speak, cat got my tongue and eventually point a is", "completely forgot point b. This is the extreme case, I not always get", "that problem. Is it on-topic here? Since most thoughtful topics I meet are", "both a and b are thought carefully enough to the point that I", "and eventually point a is spoken in a way that it's hard to", "when talking in thoughtful topics. Unless I really take note, cat always got", "to talk in my head, both a and b are thought carefully enough", "that asking this question on Academia is on-topic. But I'm afraid that it", "my tongue and eventually point a is spoken in a way that it's", "are thought carefully enough to the point that I believe that they will", "to speak, cat got my tongue and eventually point a is spoken in", "what to talk in my head, both a and b are thought carefully", "forgot point b. This is the extreme case, I not always get to", "problem. Is it on-topic here? Since most thoughtful topics I meet are in", "b. When I thinking about what to talk in my head, both a", "setting, I think that asking this question on Academia is on-topic. But I'm", "point b. This is the extreme case, I not always get to this", "is on-topic. But I'm afraid that it may be considered to be a", "considered to be a boat programming question. --- **Example:** say I need to", "this on the big Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800), and it seems that Academia is my only", "note, cat always got my tongue, even thought I know what to say.", "speaker. I have read about it, and I know that to successfully persuade", "need to use point a and b. When I thinking about what to", "talk about game theory to persuade a speaker. I have read about it,", "my tongue, even thought I know what to say. My writing is, nonetheless,", "big Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/271509/260800), and it seems that Academia is my only choice. The body", "question on Academia is on-topic. But I'm afraid that it may be considered", "here? Since most thoughtful topics I meet are in academic setting, I think", "afraid that it may be considered to be a boat programming question. ---" ]
[ "function, however they are not set as synonyms: [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\")", "the same function, however they are not set as synonyms: [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions", "not set as synonyms: [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged", "[europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") Should we re-tag", "[eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") questions (only 5 questions) with the [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show", "are two tags that have the same function, however they are not set", "(only 5 questions) with the [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") tag (81 questions).", "that have the same function, however they are not set as synonyms: [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe", "Or should someone with a higher reputation than myself, set these tags as", "however they are not set as synonyms: [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu", "\"show questions tagged 'europe'\") [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") Should we re-tag the", "questions tagged 'europe'\") tag (81 questions). Or should someone with a higher reputation", "tagged 'europe'\") tag (81 questions). Or should someone with a higher reputation than", "synonyms: [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") Should we", "[eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") Should we re-tag the [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged", "Should we re-tag the [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") questions (only 5 questions)", "\"show questions tagged 'europe'\") tag (81 questions). Or should someone with a higher", "'europe'\") tag (81 questions). Or should someone with a higher reputation than myself,", "questions) with the [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") tag (81 questions). Or should", "with the [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") tag (81 questions). Or should someone", "5 questions) with the [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") tag (81 questions). Or", "'eu'\") Should we re-tag the [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") questions (only 5", "[europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") tag (81 questions). Or should someone with a", "someone with a higher reputation than myself, set these tags as synonyms to", "as synonyms: [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") Should", "\"show questions tagged 'eu'\") Should we re-tag the [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\")", "questions tagged 'eu'\") Should we re-tag the [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") questions", "tagged 'eu'\") Should we re-tag the [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") questions (only", "re-tag the [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") questions (only 5 questions) with the", "tagged 'eu'\") questions (only 5 questions) with the [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\")", "set as synonyms: [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\")", "(81 questions). Or should someone with a higher reputation than myself, set these", "\"show questions tagged 'eu'\") questions (only 5 questions) with the [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions", "Currently there are two tags that have the same function, however they are", "a higher reputation than myself, set these tags as synonyms to each other?", "we re-tag the [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") questions (only 5 questions) with", "tagged 'europe'\") [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") Should we re-tag the [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show", "'europe'\") [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") Should we re-tag the [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions", "they are not set as synonyms: [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show", "the [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") tag (81 questions). Or should someone with", "with a higher reputation than myself, set these tags as synonyms to each", "same function, however they are not set as synonyms: [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged", "questions (only 5 questions) with the [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") tag (81", "questions). Or should someone with a higher reputation than myself, set these tags", "questions tagged 'eu'\") questions (only 5 questions) with the [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged", "have the same function, however they are not set as synonyms: [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show", "the [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") questions (only 5 questions) with the [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe", "are not set as synonyms: [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions", "two tags that have the same function, however they are not set as", "questions tagged 'europe'\") [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu \"show questions tagged 'eu'\") Should we re-tag the [eu](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/eu", "'eu'\") questions (only 5 questions) with the [europe](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/europe \"show questions tagged 'europe'\") tag", "tags that have the same function, however they are not set as synonyms:", "there are two tags that have the same function, however they are not", "tag (81 questions). Or should someone with a higher reputation than myself, set", "should someone with a higher reputation than myself, set these tags as synonyms" ]
[ "conference abstracts, etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts) According to [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe), questions about the reputability of", "[How are scholars supposed to use LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin) [Do graduate schools pay attention to", "schools pay attention to joining Phi Kappa Phi or other honor societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ) and", "commenting on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit), Mod ff524 expands this policy to also apply to", "US national or international membership organizations, which I think are different and should", "which I think are different and should be treated differently. **Are they different?", "[Do you let Google Scholar index popular science articles, conference abstracts, etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts) According", "(EOLSS) a legitimate source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source) [How are scholars supposed to use LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin) [Do graduate", "on topic and some are highly upvoted: [IEEE vs ACM membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership) [Is Academia.edu", "topic and some are highly upvoted: [IEEE vs ACM membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership) [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful)", "and we have a whole tag for questions about [google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar \"show questions tagged", "If we're limited to one general question, why even have a tag for", "ACM membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership) [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful) [ResearchGate: an asset or a waste of time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time)", "seem to be on topic and some are highly upvoted: [IEEE vs ACM", "or a waste of time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time) [Is the Encyclopedia for Life Support Systems (EOLSS)", "Support Systems (EOLSS) a legitimate source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source) [How are scholars supposed to use LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin)", "international membership organizations, which I think are different and should be treated differently.", "let Google Scholar index popular science articles, conference abstracts, etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts) According to [this", "I think are different and should be treated differently. **Are they different? Should", "about the reputability of *individual journals, publishers or conferences* are not on topic.", "different? Should they be treated differently?** If we're limited to one general question,", "treated differently?** If we're limited to one general question, why even have a", "journals, publishers or conferences* are not on topic. In closing and commenting on", "questions seem to be on topic and some are highly upvoted: [IEEE vs", "upvoted: [IEEE vs ACM membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership) [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful) [ResearchGate: an asset or a", "[Is the Encyclopedia for Life Support Systems (EOLSS) a legitimate source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source) [How are", "limited to one general question, why even have a tag for [honor-societies](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/honor-societies \"show", "publishers or conferences* are not on topic. In closing and commenting on [this", "question, why even have a tag for [honor-societies](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/honor-societies \"show questions tagged 'honor-societies'\") or", "Phi or other honor societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ) and we have a whole tag for questions", "[Do graduate schools pay attention to joining Phi Kappa Phi or other honor", "to joining Phi Kappa Phi or other honor societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ) and we have a", "According to [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe), questions about the reputability of *individual journals, publishers", "asset or a waste of time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time) [Is the Encyclopedia for Life Support Systems", "general question, why even have a tag for [honor-societies](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/honor-societies \"show questions tagged 'honor-societies'\")", "membership organizations, which I think are different and should be treated differently. **Are", "should be treated differently. **Are they different? Should they be treated differently?** If", "etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts) According to [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe), questions about the reputability of *individual journals,", "reputability of *individual journals, publishers or conferences* are not on topic. In closing", "differently. **Are they different? Should they be treated differently?** If we're limited to", "are different and should be treated differently. **Are they different? Should they be", "are scholars supposed to use LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin) [Do graduate schools pay attention to joining", "also apply to websites and large US national or international membership organizations, which", "time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time) [Is the Encyclopedia for Life Support Systems (EOLSS) a legitimate source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source) [How", "popular science articles, conference abstracts, etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts) According to [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe), questions about", "[Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful) [ResearchGate: an asset or a waste of time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time) [Is the", "about [google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar \"show questions tagged 'google-scholar'\") such as: [Do you let Google Scholar", "closing and commenting on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit), Mod ff524 expands this policy to also", "[this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe), questions about the reputability of *individual journals, publishers or conferences*", "for [honor-societies](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/honor-societies \"show questions tagged 'honor-societies'\") or [online-resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-resource \"show questions tagged 'online-resource'\") etc.?", "LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin) [Do graduate schools pay attention to joining Phi Kappa Phi or other", "think are different and should be treated differently. **Are they different? Should they", "tagged 'google-scholar'\") such as: [Do you let Google Scholar index popular science articles,", "Phi Kappa Phi or other honor societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ) and we have a whole tag", "questions tagged 'google-scholar'\") such as: [Do you let Google Scholar index popular science", "policy to also apply to websites and large US national or international membership", "be treated differently. **Are they different? Should they be treated differently?** If we're", "highly upvoted: [IEEE vs ACM membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership) [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful) [ResearchGate: an asset or", "as: [Do you let Google Scholar index popular science articles, conference abstracts, etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts)", "questions about the reputability of *individual journals, publishers or conferences* are not on", "to websites and large US national or international membership organizations, which I think", "even have a tag for [honor-societies](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/honor-societies \"show questions tagged 'honor-societies'\") or [online-resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-resource \"show", "Should they be treated differently?** If we're limited to one general question, why", "societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ) and we have a whole tag for questions about [google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar \"show questions", "and large US national or international membership organizations, which I think are different", "Scholar index popular science articles, conference abstracts, etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts) According to [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe),", "apply to websites and large US national or international membership organizations, which I", "this policy to also apply to websites and large US national or international", "some are highly upvoted: [IEEE vs ACM membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership) [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful) [ResearchGate: an", "waste of time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time) [Is the Encyclopedia for Life Support Systems (EOLSS) a legitimate", "have a tag for [honor-societies](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/honor-societies \"show questions tagged 'honor-societies'\") or [online-resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-resource \"show questions", "tag for questions about [google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar \"show questions tagged 'google-scholar'\") such as: [Do you", "In closing and commenting on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit), Mod ff524 expands this policy to", "a legitimate source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source) [How are scholars supposed to use LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin) [Do graduate schools", "not on topic. In closing and commenting on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit), Mod ff524 expands", "Systems (EOLSS) a legitimate source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source) [How are scholars supposed to use LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin) [Do", "*individual journals, publishers or conferences* are not on topic. In closing and commenting", "differently?** If we're limited to one general question, why even have a tag", "use LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin) [Do graduate schools pay attention to joining Phi Kappa Phi or", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit), Mod ff524 expands this policy to also apply to websites and", "Life Support Systems (EOLSS) a legitimate source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source) [How are scholars supposed to use", "[google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar \"show questions tagged 'google-scholar'\") such as: [Do you let Google Scholar index", "expands this policy to also apply to websites and large US national or", "we're limited to one general question, why even have a tag for [honor-societies](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/honor-societies", "science articles, conference abstracts, etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts) According to [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe), questions about the", "for questions about [google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar \"show questions tagged 'google-scholar'\") such as: [Do you let", "source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source) [How are scholars supposed to use LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin) [Do graduate schools pay attention", "or other honor societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ) and we have a whole tag for questions about", "are highly upvoted: [IEEE vs ACM membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership) [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful) [ResearchGate: an asset", "meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe), questions about the reputability of *individual journals, publishers or conferences* are", "Mod ff524 expands this policy to also apply to websites and large US", "useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful) [ResearchGate: an asset or a waste of time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time) [Is the Encyclopedia for", "national or international membership organizations, which I think are different and should be", "a whole tag for questions about [google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar \"show questions tagged 'google-scholar'\") such as:", "to [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe), questions about the reputability of *individual journals, publishers or", "a tag for [honor-societies](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/honor-societies \"show questions tagged 'honor-societies'\") or [online-resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-resource \"show questions tagged", "honor societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ) and we have a whole tag for questions about [google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar \"show", "why even have a tag for [honor-societies](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/honor-societies \"show questions tagged 'honor-societies'\") or [online-resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-resource", "to be on topic and some are highly upvoted: [IEEE vs ACM membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership)", "scholars supposed to use LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin) [Do graduate schools pay attention to joining Phi", "an asset or a waste of time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time) [Is the Encyclopedia for Life Support", "a waste of time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time) [Is the Encyclopedia for Life Support Systems (EOLSS) a", "to use LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin) [Do graduate schools pay attention to joining Phi Kappa Phi", "other honor societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ) and we have a whole tag for questions about [google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar", "Google Scholar index popular science articles, conference abstracts, etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts) According to [this meta", "on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit), Mod ff524 expands this policy to also apply to websites", "organizations, which I think are different and should be treated differently. **Are they", "and some are highly upvoted: [IEEE vs ACM membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership) [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful) [ResearchGate:", "The following questions seem to be on topic and some are highly upvoted:", "the reputability of *individual journals, publishers or conferences* are not on topic. In", "such as: [Do you let Google Scholar index popular science articles, conference abstracts,", "you let Google Scholar index popular science articles, conference abstracts, etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts) According to", "tag for [honor-societies](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/honor-societies \"show questions tagged 'honor-societies'\") or [online-resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-resource \"show questions tagged 'online-resource'\")", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit), Mod ff524 expands this policy to also apply to websites and large", "to one general question, why even have a tag for [honor-societies](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/honor-societies \"show questions", "websites and large US national or international membership organizations, which I think are", "Encyclopedia for Life Support Systems (EOLSS) a legitimate source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source) [How are scholars supposed", "to also apply to websites and large US national or international membership organizations,", "questions about [google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar \"show questions tagged 'google-scholar'\") such as: [Do you let Google", "supposed to use LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin) [Do graduate schools pay attention to joining Phi Kappa", "or international membership organizations, which I think are different and should be treated", "membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership) [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful) [ResearchGate: an asset or a waste of time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time) [Is", "conferences* are not on topic. In closing and commenting on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit), Mod", "topic. In closing and commenting on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit), Mod ff524 expands this policy", "discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe), questions about the reputability of *individual journals, publishers or conferences* are not", "are not on topic. In closing and commenting on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit), Mod ff524", "large US national or international membership organizations, which I think are different and", "legitimate source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source) [How are scholars supposed to use LinkedIn?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38490/how-are-scholars-supposed-to-use-linkedin) [Do graduate schools pay", "following questions seem to be on topic and some are highly upvoted: [IEEE", "abstracts, etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts) According to [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe), questions about the reputability of *individual", "and should be treated differently. **Are they different? Should they be treated differently?**", "of *individual journals, publishers or conferences* are not on topic. In closing and", "treated differently. **Are they different? Should they be treated differently?** If we're limited", "or conferences* are not on topic. In closing and commenting on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit),", "be treated differently?** If we're limited to one general question, why even have", "Kappa Phi or other honor societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ) and we have a whole tag for", "index popular science articles, conference abstracts, etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts) According to [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe), questions", "whole tag for questions about [google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar \"show questions tagged 'google-scholar'\") such as: [Do", "for Life Support Systems (EOLSS) a legitimate source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source) [How are scholars supposed to", "**Are they different? Should they be treated differently?** If we're limited to one", "'google-scholar'\") such as: [Do you let Google Scholar index popular science articles, conference", "vs ACM membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership) [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful) [ResearchGate: an asset or a waste of", "Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful) [ResearchGate: an asset or a waste of time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time) [Is the Encyclopedia", "[ResearchGate: an asset or a waste of time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time) [Is the Encyclopedia for Life", "we have a whole tag for questions about [google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar \"show questions tagged 'google-scholar'\")", "on topic. In closing and commenting on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit), Mod ff524 expands this", "graduate schools pay attention to joining Phi Kappa Phi or other honor societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ)", "have a whole tag for questions about [google-scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/google-scholar \"show questions tagged 'google-scholar'\") such", "pay attention to joining Phi Kappa Phi or other honor societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ) and we", "joining Phi Kappa Phi or other honor societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ) and we have a whole", "ff524 expands this policy to also apply to websites and large US national", "\"show questions tagged 'google-scholar'\") such as: [Do you let Google Scholar index popular", "and commenting on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60869/is-honorsociety-org-legit), Mod ff524 expands this policy to also apply", "attention to joining Phi Kappa Phi or other honor societies?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18193/do-graduate-schools-pay-attention-to-joining-phi-kappa-phi-or-other-honor-societ) and we have", "they different? Should they be treated differently?** If we're limited to one general", "they be treated differently?** If we're limited to one general question, why even", "[IEEE vs ACM membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership) [Is Academia.edu useful?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44632/is-academia-edu-useful) [ResearchGate: an asset or a waste", "articles, conference abstracts, etc.?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60176/do-you-let-google-scholar-index-popular-science-articles-conference-abstracts) According to [this meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1462/are-questions-about-the-reputability-of-individual-journals-publishers-or-confe), questions about the reputability", "the Encyclopedia for Life Support Systems (EOLSS) a legitimate source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source) [How are scholars", "different and should be treated differently. **Are they different? Should they be treated", "one general question, why even have a tag for [honor-societies](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/honor-societies \"show questions tagged", "be on topic and some are highly upvoted: [IEEE vs ACM membership](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/44461/ieee-vs-acm-membership) [Is", "of time?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16870/researchgate-an-asset-or-a-waste-of-time) [Is the Encyclopedia for Life Support Systems (EOLSS) a legitimate source?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42664/is-the-encyclopedia-for-life-support-systems-eolss-a-legitimate-source)" ]
[ "pertaining to legal issues changed? --- <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452> > > Is consent required by", "talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question indicates it focuses on the", "a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question indicates it focuses", "legal issues changed? --- <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452> > > Is consent required by law to", "academia?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1340/452) seems to say questions pertaining to legal issues are on-topic. However, the", "to say questions pertaining to legal issues are on-topic. However, the question below", "to record audio of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the", "it focuses on the USA only. > > > [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/dqVte.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/dqVte.png)", "> > Provided that the conference does not explicitly prohibit unauthorized audio and", "unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the presentations, and ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal", "Is consent required by law to take a picture or to record audio", "of the question [Is consent required to record audio of a conference talk", "> Is consent required by law to take a picture or to record", "visual recordings of the presentations, and ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > >", "US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question indicates it focuses on the USA only. >", "issues. > > > I am aware of the question [Is consent required", "but as the question indicates it focuses on the USA only. > >", "take a picture or to record audio / video of a conference talk", "is a legal question. Has the stance on questions pertaining to legal issues", "to legal issues changed? --- <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452> > > Is consent required by law", "aware of the question [Is consent required to record audio of a conference", "the grounds that it is a legal question. Has the stance on questions", "a conference talk in France? > > > Provided that the conference does", "does not explicitly prohibit unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the presentations, and", "of questions on legal issues related to academia?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1340/452) seems to say questions pertaining", "to academia?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1340/452) seems to say questions pertaining to legal issues are on-topic. However,", "stance on questions pertaining to legal issues changed? --- <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452> > > Is", "changed? --- <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452> > > Is consent required by law to take a", "a legal question. Has the stance on questions pertaining to legal issues changed?", "on the grounds that it is a legal question. Has the stance on", "> > > Provided that the conference does not explicitly prohibit unauthorized audio", "the question [Is consent required to record audio of a conference talk in", "say questions pertaining to legal issues are on-topic. However, the question below got", "question below got closed on the grounds that it is a legal question.", "> > I am aware of the question [Is consent required to record", "issues are on-topic. However, the question below got closed on the grounds that", "the question below got closed on the grounds that it is a legal", "questions pertaining to legal issues changed? --- <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452> > > Is consent required", "/ video of a conference talk in France? > > > Provided that", "to legal issues are on-topic. However, the question below got closed on the", "in France? > > > Provided that the conference does not explicitly prohibit", "ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > > I am aware of the question", "legal issues are on-topic. However, the question below got closed on the grounds", "question. Has the stance on questions pertaining to legal issues changed? --- <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452>", "--- <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452> > > Is consent required by law to take a picture", "am aware of the question [Is consent required to record audio of a", "issues related to academia?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1340/452) seems to say questions pertaining to legal issues are", "> Provided that the conference does not explicitly prohibit unauthorized audio and visual", "questions pertaining to legal issues are on-topic. However, the question below got closed", "However, the question below got closed on the grounds that it is a", "it is a legal question. Has the stance on questions pertaining to legal", "not explicitly prohibit unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the presentations, and ignoring", "ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > > I am aware of the", "the question indicates it focuses on the USA only. > > > [![enter", "of the presentations, and ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > > I", "audio and visual recordings of the presentations, and ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues.", "required to record audio of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as", "that the conference does not explicitly prohibit unauthorized audio and visual recordings of", "legal issues related to academia?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1340/452) seems to say questions pertaining to legal issues", "required by law to take a picture or to record audio / video", "question indicates it focuses on the USA only. > > > [![enter image", "the presentations, and ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > > I am", "indicates it focuses on the USA only. > > > [![enter image description", "of a conference talk in France? > > > Provided that the conference", "and visual recordings of the presentations, and ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. >", "other non-legal issues. > > > I am aware of the question [Is", "law to take a picture or to record audio / video of a", "I am aware of the question [Is consent required to record audio of", "consent required to record audio of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but", "seems to say questions pertaining to legal issues are on-topic. However, the question", "the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question indicates it focuses on the USA only.", "to take a picture or to record audio / video of a conference", "are on-topic. However, the question below got closed on the grounds that it", "by law to take a picture or to record audio / video of", "[Is consent required to record audio of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452),", "conference talk in France? > > > Provided that the conference does not", "> I am aware of the question [Is consent required to record audio", "[On-topic-ness of questions on legal issues related to academia?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1340/452) seems to say questions", "audio of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question indicates", "to record audio / video of a conference talk in France? > >", "below got closed on the grounds that it is a legal question. Has", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452> > > Is consent required by law to take a picture or", "a picture or to record audio / video of a conference talk in", "non-legal issues. > > > I am aware of the question [Is consent", "that it is a legal question. Has the stance on questions pertaining to", "or to record audio / video of a conference talk in France? >", "prohibit unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the presentations, and ignoring ethical/political/any other", "> > Is consent required by law to take a picture or to", "the conference does not explicitly prohibit unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the", "got closed on the grounds that it is a legal question. Has the", "the stance on questions pertaining to legal issues changed? --- <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452> > >", "on questions pertaining to legal issues changed? --- <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452> > > Is consent", "issues changed? --- <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452> > > Is consent required by law to take", "picture or to record audio / video of a conference talk in France?", "Provided that the conference does not explicitly prohibit unauthorized audio and visual recordings", "conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question indicates it focuses on", "audio / video of a conference talk in France? > > > Provided", "conference does not explicitly prohibit unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the presentations,", "presentations, and ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > > I am aware", "record audio of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question", "related to academia?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1340/452) seems to say questions pertaining to legal issues are on-topic.", "and ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > > I am aware of", "question [Is consent required to record audio of a conference talk in the", "on legal issues related to academia?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1340/452) seems to say questions pertaining to legal", "Has the stance on questions pertaining to legal issues changed? --- <https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/31806/452> >", "questions on legal issues related to academia?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1340/452) seems to say questions pertaining to", "talk in France? > > > Provided that the conference does not explicitly", "explicitly prohibit unauthorized audio and visual recordings of the presentations, and ignoring ethical/political/any", "recordings of the presentations, and ignoring ethical/political/any other non-legal issues. > > >", "France? > > > Provided that the conference does not explicitly prohibit unauthorized", "consent required by law to take a picture or to record audio /", "record audio / video of a conference talk in France? > > >", "pertaining to legal issues are on-topic. However, the question below got closed on", "legal question. Has the stance on questions pertaining to legal issues changed? ---", "> > > I am aware of the question [Is consent required to", "of a conference talk in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question indicates it", "as the question indicates it focuses on the USA only. > > >", "grounds that it is a legal question. Has the stance on questions pertaining", "video of a conference talk in France? > > > Provided that the", "closed on the grounds that it is a legal question. Has the stance", "on-topic. However, the question below got closed on the grounds that it is", "in the US?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17005/452), but as the question indicates it focuses on the USA" ]
[ "form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ```", "Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on", "addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the", "advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form.", "twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs *", "we have updated some of the guidelines compared to previously - the changes", "high DPI) surrounding it.** ### Score Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold**", "a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and will", "in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process.", "If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The", "mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything else to", "are marked in bold in the Image Requirements section. ### What are Community", "Please **do not add anything else to the body of the post**. If", "to this question *must* conform to the following rules, or they will be", "show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of", "the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while", "a way to promote information and resources that are *relevant to your own", "it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the", "are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the", "vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable", "restart the Community Promotion Ads for 2016! Keep in mind, we have updated", "hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG", "If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and", "exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to this question", "cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material", "as a way to promote information and resources that are *relevant to your", "bold in the Image Requirements section. ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community", "for 2016! Keep in mind, we have updated some of the guidelines compared", "way to promote information and resources that are *relevant to your own community's", "stuff your community deems important*. This also serves as a way to promote", "of **150 KB** * **If the background of the image is white or", "* cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be", "file size of **150 KB** * **If the background of the image is", "a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to", "### Image requirements * The image that you create must be **300 x", "size](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272563/were-standardizing-the-sidebar-width-at-300px-on-all-sites). As such, we can now restart the Community Promotion Ads for 2016!", "* Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit", "for future visitors to find out about *the stuff your community deems important*.", "Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on", "'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag", "can check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click", "the post**. If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments.", "is a method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors", "a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post", "in the Image Requirements section. ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion", "interests*, both for those already in the community and those yet to join.", "served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things.", "As such, we can now restart the Community Promotion Ads for 2016! Keep", "community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right", "the background of the image is white or partially white, there must be", "serves as a way to promote information and resources that are *relevant to", "Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in", "in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from", "every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad", "else to the body of the post**. If you want to discuss something,", "the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story", "restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service", "we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the", "be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the", "both for those already in the community and those yet to join. ###", "Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane", "this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled", "the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does", "to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following things:", "there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it.** ###", "now, and we've [made some changes to the sidebar size](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272563/were-standardizing-the-sidebar-width-at-300px-on-all-sites). As such, we", "can now restart the Community Promotion Ads for 2016! Keep in mind, we", "community and will continue to be so, it is a good idea to", "a **minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**) before it will", "**minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**) before it will be", "*the stuff your community deems important*. This also serves as a way to", "such, we can now restart the Community Promotion Ads for 2016! Keep in", "advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This", "the body of the post**. If you want to discuss something, do it", "to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year", "service or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to", "the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For", "resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything", "are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show", "to the body of the post**. If you want to discuss something, do", "community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion", "mind, we have updated some of the guidelines compared to previously - the", "question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community", "new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the", "genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out", "uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs *", "might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites", "score threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**) before it will be shown", "for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the", "other things will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting", "Score Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently", "the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with", "Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main", "[made some changes to the sidebar size](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272563/were-standardizing-the-sidebar-width-at-300px-on-all-sites). As such, we can now restart", "of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to", "in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset", "answer must meet (currently **6**) before it will be shown on the main", "community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we", "an answer must meet (currently **6**) before it will be shown on the", "image is white or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px", "(currently **6**) before it will be shown on the main site. You can", "ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions", "they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form", "required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must be", "those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year?", "years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces to show", "community deems important*. This also serves as a way to promote information and", "and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences *", "GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of **150 KB** * **If the", "do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over", "pixels**, or double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our", "be shown on the main site. You can check out the ads that", "the Community Promotion Ads for 2016! Keep in mind, we have updated some", "Community Promotion Ads for 2016! Keep in mind, we have updated some of", "(imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute", "the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is", "community's interests*, both for those already in the community and those yet to", "will continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost it.", "in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic", "main site. You can check out the ads that have met the threshold", "in mind, we have updated some of the guidelines compared to previously -", "the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have", "show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything", "[1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything else to the", "the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images", "the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the", "join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will", "newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not", "subject matter of the community, but to the current status of the community.", "to the sidebar size](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272563/were-standardizing-the-sidebar-width-at-300px-on-all-sites). As such, we can now restart the Community Promotion", "information and resources that are *relevant to your own community's interests*, both for", "against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or", "rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the", "it a new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery", "the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be", "up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this", "campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community", "in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community,", "the Image Requirements section. ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads", "ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very", "things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just", "the community, but to the current status of the community. We reset the", "on the site. For example, you might promote the following things: * the", "add anything else to the body of the post**. If you want to", "site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting", "anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for", "some changes to the sidebar size](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272563/were-standardizing-the-sidebar-width-at-300px-on-all-sites). As such, we can now restart the", "every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things", "How does it work? The answers you post to this question *must* conform", "this question *must* conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored.", "create must be **300 x 250 pixels**, or double that if high DPI.", "out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in", "will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads", "or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to be", "white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it.**", "reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have", "while other things will wane to allow for new faces to show up.", "the subject matter of the community, but to the current status of the", "Absolute limit on file size of **150 KB** * **If the background of", "will be shown on the main site. You can check out the ads", "usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow for new", "questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements,", "on the main site. You can check out the ads that have met", "yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some", "that will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The", "The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged", "is white or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if", "### Score Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold** an answer must meet", "previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the", "and resources that are *relevant to your own community's interests*, both for those", "December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from", "valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it is a", "our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No", "is for future visitors to find out about *the stuff your community deems", "in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url", "updated some of the guidelines compared to previously - the changes are marked", "if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur)", "future visitors to find out about *the stuff your community deems important*. This", "tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this", "example, you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account *", "some of the guidelines compared to previously - the changes are marked in", "of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The", "high DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) *", "(2px if high DPI) surrounding it.** ### Score Threshold There is a **minimum", "border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it.** ### Score Threshold There is a", "question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\")", "2016! Keep in mind, we have updated some of the guidelines compared to", "be **300 x 250 pixels**, or double that if high DPI. * Must", "those already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do", "have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer", "In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills", "the site. For example, you might promote the following things: * the site's", "* Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be", "be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file", "on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question", "or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The", "out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click stats [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/ads/display/2148).", "functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the", "DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must", "you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic", "the guidelines compared to previously - the changes are marked in bold in", "community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads", "a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it.** ### Score Threshold There", "discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be", "we can now restart the Community Promotion Ads for 2016! Keep in mind,", "resources that are *relevant to your own community's interests*, both for those already", "**If the background of the image is white or partially white, there must", "and will continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost", "It may be helpful to give it a new face in the process,", "the sidebar size](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272563/were-standardizing-the-sidebar-width-at-300px-on-all-sites). As such, we can now restart the Community Promotion Ads", "year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose", "section. ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements", "animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of **150 KB** * **If", "[2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything else to the body of", "cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community", "or double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard", "* academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events", "maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow for", "Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that", "the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of", "purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps", "No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of **150 KB** *", "ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other", "and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out", "the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads?", "Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up", "This is a method for the community to control what gets promoted to", "before it will be shown on the main site. You can check out", "services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to", "process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale", "story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community would", "Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness", "form with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that", "always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In", "promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle.", "show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old", "the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required", "give it a new face in the process, so as to prevent the", "**300 x 250 pixels**, or double that if high DPI. * Must be", "stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers", "very valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it is", "1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it.** ### Score Threshold There is", "else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future", "to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services", "size of **150 KB** * **If the background of the image is white", "Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements", "You can check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic", "in The goal is for future visitors to find out about *the stuff", "the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads", "to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep", "it is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to", "faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and", "to your own community's interests*, both for those already in the community and", "from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable", "Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**)", "Image Requirements section. ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are", "that are *relevant to your own community's interests*, both for those already in", "of the guidelines compared to previously - the changes are marked in bold", "enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form", "The goal is for future visitors to find out about *the stuff your", "have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control", "sidebar size](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272563/were-standardizing-the-sidebar-width-at-300px-on-all-sites). As such, we can now restart the Community Promotion Ads for", "be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a", "something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged", "All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show", "after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you", "meet (currently **6**) before it will be shown on the main site. You", "particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue", "interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your", "form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must be **300", "so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful", "Image requirements * The image that you create must be **300 x 250", "in bold in the Image Requirements section. ### What are Community Promotion Ads?", "year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will", "material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the", "have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a", "is a **minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**) before it", "does it work? The answers you post to this question *must* conform to", "limit on file size of **150 KB** * **If the background of the", "that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader", "the years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces to", "be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]:", "be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it.** ### Score Threshold", "matter of the community, but to the current status of the community. We", "community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to", "of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to this", "### How does it work? The answers you post to this question *must*", "are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ###", "http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything else to the body of the", "reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad", "post to this question *must* conform to the following rules, or they will", "site. You can check out the ads that have met the threshold with", "1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to", "[![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not", "ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads", "face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad", "answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image", "but to the current status of the community. We reset the ads once", "enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion", "or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of", "will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose", "own community's interests*, both for those already in the community and those yet", "events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested in", "DPI) surrounding it.** ### Score Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold** an", "tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also", "the community and will continue to be so, it is a good idea", "of the post**. If you want to discuss something, do it in the", "is very valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it", "We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads", "for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to", "community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous", "Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site,", "the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure.", "idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new", "will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community", "surrounding it.** ### Score Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold** an answer", "to promote information and resources that are *relevant to your own community's interests*,", "the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but", "it will be shown on the main site. You can check out the", "**do not add anything else to the body of the post**. If you", "following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources *", "account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool", "``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do", "* Absolute limit on file size of **150 KB** * **If the background", "control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might", "The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a", "be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ```", "ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to be so,", "a method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on", "threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**) before it will be shown on", "the current status of the community. We reset the ads once a year,", "* anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is", "of the image is white or partially white, there must be a 1px", "magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality", "compared to previously - the changes are marked in bold in the Image", "* the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus", "now restart the Community Promotion Ads for 2016! Keep in mind, we have", "to find out about *the stuff your community deems important*. This also serves", "for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate", "status of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December.", "* **If the background of the image is white or partially white, there", "we've [made some changes to the sidebar size](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272563/were-standardizing-the-sidebar-width-at-300px-on-all-sites). As such, we can now", "with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling", "to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always", "the image is white or partially white, there must be a 1px border", "is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give", "Requirements section. ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted", "conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal", "the main site. You can check out the ads that have met the", "things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting", "you create must be **300 x 250 pixels**, or double that if high", "your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors", "to not just the subject matter of the community, but to the current", "your community deems important*. This also serves as a way to promote information", "ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant", "process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the", "not add anything else to the body of the post**. If you want", "a new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of", "allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps", "year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an", "an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is", "your own community's interests*, both for those already in the community and those", "have updated some of the guidelines compared to previously - the changes are", "also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements", "to previously - the changes are marked in bold in the Image Requirements", "also serves as a way to promote information and resources that are *relevant", "the changes are marked in bold in the Image Requirements section. ### What", "prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of", "this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ###", "the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will", "on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything else", "to the current status of the community. We reset the ads once a", "and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every", "just the subject matter of the community, but to the current status of", "Keep in mind, we have updated some of the guidelines compared to previously", "to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should", "of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above", "for those already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why", "purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are", "this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and", "so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after", "accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be", "year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to", "do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with", "the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no", "Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF", "above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must", "pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements *", "This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the", "a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it", "*relevant to your own community's interests*, both for those already in the community", "the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the", "The answers you post to this question *must* conform to the following rules,", "do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community", "would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find", "goal is for future visitors to find out about *the stuff your community", "and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do", "relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but to the", "as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a", "promote information and resources that are *relevant to your own community's interests*, both", "or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI)", "of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How", "no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular", "* No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of **150 KB**", "the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create", "you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question", "250 pixels**, or double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through", "to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you", "find out about *the stuff your community deems important*. This also serves as", "Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the", "helpful to give it a new face in the process, so as to", "### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain", "provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why", "the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]:", "exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url", "changes are marked in bold in the Image Requirements section. ### What are", "KB** * **If the background of the image is white or partially white,", "*must* conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All", "that you create must be **300 x 250 pixels**, or double that if", "good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a", "white or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high", "### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that", "must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it.** ### Score", "the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be", "\"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the", "[community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of", "from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work?", "standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated", "previously - the changes are marked in bold in the Image Requirements section.", "There is a **minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently **6**) before", "promote the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and", "keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter", "be helpful to give it a new face in the process, so as", "out about *the stuff your community deems important*. This also serves as a", "or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact", "what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote", "to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year", "What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will", "### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for", "work? The answers you post to this question *must* conform to the following", "their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This", "tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to", "about *the stuff your community deems important*. This also serves as a way", "method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the", "it.** ### Score Threshold There is a **minimum score threshold** an answer must", "main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the", "requirements * The image that you create must be **300 x 250 pixels**,", "conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers", "to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add", "will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow", "important*. This also serves as a way to promote information and resources that", "be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition", "must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag.", "already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we", "Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control what gets", "anything else to the body of the post**. If you want to discuss", "GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size", "if high DPI) surrounding it.** ### Score Threshold There is a **minimum score", "The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements", "* The image that you create must be **300 x 250 pixels**, or", "imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ###", "websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences", "Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the", "once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against", "answers you post to this question *must* conform to the following rules, or", "through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG *", "shown on the main site. You can check out the ads that have", "The image that you create must be **300 x 250 pixels**, or double", "that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for", "ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If", "- the changes are marked in bold in the Image Requirements section. ###", "question *must* conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1.", "with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you", "This also serves as a way to promote information and resources that are", "must meet (currently **6**) before it will be shown on the main site.", "Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control what", "to give it a new face in the process, so as to prevent", "advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar.", "ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it", "every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their", "academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or", "background of the image is white or partially white, there must be a", "things will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the", "double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image", "Promotion Ads for 2016! Keep in mind, we have updated some of the", "gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the", "guidelines compared to previously - the changes are marked in bold in the", "wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every", "image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs", "Ads for 2016! Keep in mind, we have updated some of the guidelines", "changes to the sidebar size](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272563/were-standardizing-the-sidebar-width-at-300px-on-all-sites). As such, we can now restart the Community", "fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads", "site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs", "2016 now, and we've [made some changes to the sidebar size](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272563/were-standardizing-the-sidebar-width-at-300px-on-all-sites). As such,", "to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer", "be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out about", "shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method", "image that you create must be **300 x 250 pixels**, or double that", "comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show", "repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new face in", "for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site.", "Ads? This is a method for the community to control what gets promoted", "continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It", "the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The", "want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must", "should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2]", "of the community, but to the current status of the community. We reset", "up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads", "partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding", "helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to", "following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in", "be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or", "must be **300 x 250 pixels**, or double that if high DPI. *", "ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but to", "PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of **150", "ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline", "promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following", "2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions", "ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served", "body of the post**. If you want to discuss something, do it in", "x 250 pixels**, or double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted", "community, but to the current status of the community. We reset the ads", "of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please", "old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher", "current status of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every", "marked in bold in the Image Requirements section. ### What are Community Promotion", "on file size of **150 KB** * **If the background of the image", "new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this,", "allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for", "is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting", "it work? The answers you post to this question *must* conform to the", "of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided,", "voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have", "a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting", "it. It may be helpful to give it a new face in the", "will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of:", "post**. If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2.", "not just the subject matter of the community, but to the current status", "reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years,", "site. For example, you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter", "and we've [made some changes to the sidebar size](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272563/were-standardizing-the-sidebar-width-at-300px-on-all-sites). As such, we can", "visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following things: *", "``` Please **do not add anything else to the body of the post**.", "* interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else", "advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown.", "check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click stats", "to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is", "right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of", "the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community", "are *relevant to your own community's interests*, both for those already in the", "**6**) before it will be shown on the main site. You can check", "visitors to find out about *the stuff your community deems important*. This also", "cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested", "http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please **do not add anything else to the body", "the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting", "**150 KB** * **If the background of the image is white or partially", "to be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may", "tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image", "you post to this question *must* conform to the following rules, or they", "helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject", "For example, you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account", "answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on", "interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out about *the", "to the community and will continue to be so, it is a good", "to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows", "to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new face", "community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example,", "over the years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces", "may be helpful to give it a new face in the process, so", "blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely", "sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the", "getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The", "we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to", "be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may be", "the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources", "deems important*. This also serves as a way to promote information and resources", "It's 2016 now, and we've [made some changes to the sidebar size](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/272563/were-standardizing-the-sidebar-width-at-300px-on-all-sites). As" ]
[ "my nearest colleagues know about it just because they happened to look at", "> > Colleague: Acafitoa? What's that, another one of your nerdy sites >", "kindergarten conversation from 50 years old people!): > > Colleague: Acafitoa? What's that,", "students, but also them? > > > Me: Yes, you know that the", "I'll probably even [get a t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)! > > > Colleague: Gee. > >", "I read questions like [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61749) I wonder if we are aware of", "I know. But do they listen to you? > > > Me: It", "us and your students, but also them? > > > Me: Yes, you", "read questions like [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61749) I wonder if we are aware of the", "large fraction of the academic world, especially outside fields like computer science or", "your nerdy sites > like [...]? > > > Me: This one's international!", "This one's international! > > > Colleague: Ha! Acafitoa? > > > Me:", "take a picture in the lab. > > > Colleague: Can't wait! >", "Me: This one's international! > > > Colleague: Ha! Acafitoa? > > >", "> > Me: Yes, you know that the main goal of my life", "data, even very rough, or general idea, on how much Acafitoa.SE is known", "in the lab. > > > Colleague: Can't wait! > > > Hence,", "many people as possible. > > > Colleague: I know, I know. But", "you to take a picture in the lab. > > > Colleague: Can't", "be totally unknown to a large fraction of the academic world, especially outside", "that the main goal of my life is to annoy as many people", "annoy as many people as possible. > > > Colleague: I know, I", "if they knew, they might be totally unimpressed. For instance, my nearest colleagues", "at my computer's screen seeing Acafitoa.SE opened in the browser. And then the", "life is to annoy as many people as possible. > > > Colleague:", "one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61749) I wonder if we are aware of the fact that Acafitoa.SE, and", "you? > > > Me: It appears that I'm a top user... I'll", "rough, or general idea, on how much Acafitoa.SE is known in the academic", "top user... I'll probably even [get a t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)! > > > Colleague: Gee.", "browser. And then the conversation typically goes like this (yeah, real kindergarten conversation", "> > Colleague: ... > > > Me: I'll ask you to take", "Colleague: I know, I know. But do they listen to you? > >", "conversation from 50 years old people!): > > Colleague: Acafitoa? What's that, another", "But do they listen to you? > > > Me: It appears that", "wait! > > > Hence, the titular question: do we have any data,", "like [...]? > > > Me: This one's international! > > > Colleague:", "have any data, even very rough, or general idea, on how much Acafitoa.SE", "of the fact that Acafitoa.SE, and the whole Stack Overflow network, might be", "[this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61749) I wonder if we are aware of the fact that Acafitoa.SE,", "idea, on how much Acafitoa.SE is known in the academic world? What is", "Gee. > > > Me: I'll wear it. > > > Colleague: ...", "they listen to you? > > > Me: It appears that I'm a", "to look at my computer's screen seeing Acafitoa.SE opened in the browser. And", "knew, they might be totally unimpressed. For instance, my nearest colleagues know about", "question: do we have any data, even very rough, or general idea, on", "totally unknown to a large fraction of the academic world, especially outside fields", "students etc. > > > Colleague: So, not only do you pester us", "or mathematics. And even if they knew, they might be totally unimpressed. For", "I'll wear it. > > > Colleague: ... > > > Me: I'll", "Colleague: Can't wait! > > > Hence, the titular question: do we have", "(yeah, real kindergarten conversation from 50 years old people!): > > Colleague: Acafitoa?", "> Colleague: Gee. > > > Me: I'll wear it. > > >", "it. > > > Colleague: ... > > > Me: I'll ask you", "of your nerdy sites > like [...]? > > > Me: This one's", "mathematics. And even if they knew, they might be totally unimpressed. For instance,", "know. But do they listen to you? > > > Me: It appears", "What's that, another one of your nerdy sites > like [...]? > >", "t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)! > > > Colleague: Gee. > > > Me: I'll wear it.", "to a large fraction of the academic world, especially outside fields like computer", "Colleague: Ha! Acafitoa? > > > Me: It's about the academic world: teaching,", "> Colleague: I know, I know. But do they listen to you? >", "the conversation typically goes like this (yeah, real kindergarten conversation from 50 years", "outside fields like computer science or mathematics. And even if they knew, they", "I'm a top user... I'll probably even [get a t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)! > > >", "> > > Colleague: Gee. > > > Me: I'll wear it. >", "ask you to take a picture in the lab. > > > Colleague:", "colleagues know about it just because they happened to look at my computer's", "to take a picture in the lab. > > > Colleague: Can't wait!", "it just because they happened to look at my computer's screen seeing Acafitoa.SE", "instance, my nearest colleagues know about it just because they happened to look", "academic world, especially outside fields like computer science or mathematics. And even if", "look at my computer's screen seeing Acafitoa.SE opened in the browser. And then", "you pester us and your students, but also them? > > > Me:", "of my life is to annoy as many people as possible. > >", "they happened to look at my computer's screen seeing Acafitoa.SE opened in the", "them? > > > Me: Yes, you know that the main goal of", "I know, I know. But do they listen to you? > > >", "picture in the lab. > > > Colleague: Can't wait! > > >", "happened to look at my computer's screen seeing Acafitoa.SE opened in the browser.", "that Acafitoa.SE, and the whole Stack Overflow network, might be totally unknown to", "totally unimpressed. For instance, my nearest colleagues know about it just because they", "computer science or mathematics. And even if they knew, they might be totally", "general idea, on how much Acafitoa.SE is known in the academic world? What", "very rough, or general idea, on how much Acafitoa.SE is known in the", "Overflow network, might be totally unknown to a large fraction of the academic", "your students, but also them? > > > Me: Yes, you know that", "not only do you pester us and your students, but also them? >", "> > > Colleague: Can't wait! > > > Hence, the titular question:", "and the whole Stack Overflow network, might be totally unknown to a large", "the fact that Acafitoa.SE, and the whole Stack Overflow network, might be totally", "conversation typically goes like this (yeah, real kindergarten conversation from 50 years old", "> > > Colleague: I know, I know. But do they listen to", "might be totally unknown to a large fraction of the academic world, especially", "just because they happened to look at my computer's screen seeing Acafitoa.SE opened", "... > > > Me: I'll ask you to take a picture in", "It appears that I'm a top user... I'll probably even [get a t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)!", "Acafitoa? What's that, another one of your nerdy sites > like [...]? >", "So, not only do you pester us and your students, but also them?", "we are aware of the fact that Acafitoa.SE, and the whole Stack Overflow", "seeing Acafitoa.SE opened in the browser. And then the conversation typically goes like", "goes like this (yeah, real kindergarten conversation from 50 years old people!): >", "It's about the academic world: teaching, papers, PhD students etc. > > >", "and your students, but also them? > > > Me: Yes, you know", "> > > Me: It's about the academic world: teaching, papers, PhD students", "real kindergarten conversation from 50 years old people!): > > Colleague: Acafitoa? What's", "know about it just because they happened to look at my computer's screen", "even if they knew, they might be totally unimpressed. For instance, my nearest", "but also them? > > > Me: Yes, you know that the main", "like [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61749) I wonder if we are aware of the fact that", "> > Me: I'll ask you to take a picture in the lab.", "I'll ask you to take a picture in the lab. > > >", "we have any data, even very rough, or general idea, on how much", "Me: Yes, you know that the main goal of my life is to", "Stack Overflow network, might be totally unknown to a large fraction of the", "another one of your nerdy sites > like [...]? > > > Me:", "a large fraction of the academic world, especially outside fields like computer science", "only do you pester us and your students, but also them? > >", "Colleague: Gee. > > > Me: I'll wear it. > > > Colleague:", "[get a t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)! > > > Colleague: Gee. > > > Me: I'll", "unknown to a large fraction of the academic world, especially outside fields like", "fields like computer science or mathematics. And even if they knew, they might", "Colleague: ... > > > Me: I'll ask you to take a picture", "the whole Stack Overflow network, might be totally unknown to a large fraction", "know, I know. But do they listen to you? > > > Me:", "Ha! Acafitoa? > > > Me: It's about the academic world: teaching, papers,", "Colleague: So, not only do you pester us and your students, but also", "Colleague: Acafitoa? What's that, another one of your nerdy sites > like [...]?", "old people!): > > Colleague: Acafitoa? What's that, another one of your nerdy", "world: teaching, papers, PhD students etc. > > > Colleague: So, not only", "teaching, papers, PhD students etc. > > > Colleague: So, not only do", "> > Me: I'll wear it. > > > Colleague: ... > >", "> Colleague: Can't wait! > > > Hence, the titular question: do we", "about the academic world: teaching, papers, PhD students etc. > > > Colleague:", "papers, PhD students etc. > > > Colleague: So, not only do you", "Hence, the titular question: do we have any data, even very rough, or", "you know that the main goal of my life is to annoy as", "> Colleague: ... > > > Me: I'll ask you to take a", "be totally unimpressed. For instance, my nearest colleagues know about it just because", "how much Acafitoa.SE is known in the academic world? What is your impression?", "50 years old people!): > > Colleague: Acafitoa? What's that, another one of", "> > Colleague: So, not only do you pester us and your students,", "unimpressed. For instance, my nearest colleagues know about it just because they happened", "> > > Me: Yes, you know that the main goal of my", "> > > Colleague: ... > > > Me: I'll ask you to", "from 50 years old people!): > > Colleague: Acafitoa? What's that, another one", "Me: I'll ask you to take a picture in the lab. > >", "> Hence, the titular question: do we have any data, even very rough,", "questions like [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61749) I wonder if we are aware of the fact", "> Me: It appears that I'm a top user... I'll probably even [get", "then the conversation typically goes like this (yeah, real kindergarten conversation from 50", "Me: It's about the academic world: teaching, papers, PhD students etc. > >", "any data, even very rough, or general idea, on how much Acafitoa.SE is", "the academic world: teaching, papers, PhD students etc. > > > Colleague: So,", "that I'm a top user... I'll probably even [get a t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)! > >", "to you? > > > Me: It appears that I'm a top user...", "on how much Acafitoa.SE is known in the academic world? What is your", "> Colleague: So, not only do you pester us and your students, but", "I wonder if we are aware of the fact that Acafitoa.SE, and the", "know that the main goal of my life is to annoy as many", "main goal of my life is to annoy as many people as possible.", "as possible. > > > Colleague: I know, I know. But do they", "typically goes like this (yeah, real kindergarten conversation from 50 years old people!):", "> > Me: This one's international! > > > Colleague: Ha! Acafitoa? >", "> Colleague: Acafitoa? What's that, another one of your nerdy sites > like", "Acafitoa? > > > Me: It's about the academic world: teaching, papers, PhD", "Me: It appears that I'm a top user... I'll probably even [get a", "Me: I'll wear it. > > > Colleague: ... > > > Me:", "> > > Colleague: So, not only do you pester us and your", "one's international! > > > Colleague: Ha! Acafitoa? > > > Me: It's", "> > Me: It appears that I'm a top user... I'll probably even", "about it just because they happened to look at my computer's screen seeing", "And then the conversation typically goes like this (yeah, real kindergarten conversation from", "fraction of the academic world, especially outside fields like computer science or mathematics.", "sites > like [...]? > > > Me: This one's international! > >", "if we are aware of the fact that Acafitoa.SE, and the whole Stack", "Acafitoa.SE opened in the browser. And then the conversation typically goes like this", "> > > Me: This one's international! > > > Colleague: Ha! Acafitoa?", "whole Stack Overflow network, might be totally unknown to a large fraction of", "might be totally unimpressed. For instance, my nearest colleagues know about it just", "they might be totally unimpressed. For instance, my nearest colleagues know about it", "even [get a t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)! > > > Colleague: Gee. > > > Me:", "a t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)! > > > Colleague: Gee. > > > Me: I'll wear", "> > Colleague: Gee. > > > Me: I'll wear it. > >", "are aware of the fact that Acafitoa.SE, and the whole Stack Overflow network,", "[...]? > > > Me: This one's international! > > > Colleague: Ha!", "> Colleague: Ha! Acafitoa? > > > Me: It's about the academic world:", "titular question: do we have any data, even very rough, or general idea,", "do we have any data, even very rough, or general idea, on how", "etc. > > > Colleague: So, not only do you pester us and", "years old people!): > > Colleague: Acafitoa? What's that, another one of your", "> > Colleague: Can't wait! > > > Hence, the titular question: do", "as many people as possible. > > > Colleague: I know, I know.", "user... I'll probably even [get a t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)! > > > Colleague: Gee. >", "also them? > > > Me: Yes, you know that the main goal", "> > Colleague: I know, I know. But do they listen to you?", "wonder if we are aware of the fact that Acafitoa.SE, and the whole", "is to annoy as many people as possible. > > > Colleague: I", "> > > Me: I'll wear it. > > > Colleague: ... >", "> Me: Yes, you know that the main goal of my life is", "aware of the fact that Acafitoa.SE, and the whole Stack Overflow network, might", "For instance, my nearest colleagues know about it just because they happened to", "When I read questions like [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61749) I wonder if we are aware", "probably even [get a t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)! > > > Colleague: Gee. > > >", "lab. > > > Colleague: Can't wait! > > > Hence, the titular", "possible. > > > Colleague: I know, I know. But do they listen", "or general idea, on how much Acafitoa.SE is known in the academic world?", "of the academic world, especially outside fields like computer science or mathematics. And", "> like [...]? > > > Me: This one's international! > > >", "science or mathematics. And even if they knew, they might be totally unimpressed.", "> Me: I'll wear it. > > > Colleague: ... > > >", "> > > Me: I'll ask you to take a picture in the", "> > Hence, the titular question: do we have any data, even very", "the academic world, especially outside fields like computer science or mathematics. And even", "this (yeah, real kindergarten conversation from 50 years old people!): > > Colleague:", "they knew, they might be totally unimpressed. For instance, my nearest colleagues know", "screen seeing Acafitoa.SE opened in the browser. And then the conversation typically goes", "the browser. And then the conversation typically goes like this (yeah, real kindergarten", "one of your nerdy sites > like [...]? > > > Me: This", "even very rough, or general idea, on how much Acafitoa.SE is known in", "> > Colleague: Ha! Acafitoa? > > > Me: It's about the academic", "pester us and your students, but also them? > > > Me: Yes,", "people!): > > Colleague: Acafitoa? What's that, another one of your nerdy sites", "> > Me: It's about the academic world: teaching, papers, PhD students etc.", "my life is to annoy as many people as possible. > > >", "the lab. > > > Colleague: Can't wait! > > > Hence, the", "opened in the browser. And then the conversation typically goes like this (yeah,", "computer's screen seeing Acafitoa.SE opened in the browser. And then the conversation typically", "Yes, you know that the main goal of my life is to annoy", "people as possible. > > > Colleague: I know, I know. But do", "listen to you? > > > Me: It appears that I'm a top", "my computer's screen seeing Acafitoa.SE opened in the browser. And then the conversation", "appears that I'm a top user... I'll probably even [get a t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)! >", "network, might be totally unknown to a large fraction of the academic world,", "especially outside fields like computer science or mathematics. And even if they knew,", "in the browser. And then the conversation typically goes like this (yeah, real", "like this (yeah, real kindergarten conversation from 50 years old people!): > >", "nerdy sites > like [...]? > > > Me: This one's international! >", "because they happened to look at my computer's screen seeing Acafitoa.SE opened in", "> Me: This one's international! > > > Colleague: Ha! Acafitoa? > >", "> Me: It's about the academic world: teaching, papers, PhD students etc. >", "PhD students etc. > > > Colleague: So, not only do you pester", "like computer science or mathematics. And even if they knew, they might be", "> Me: I'll ask you to take a picture in the lab. >", "academic world: teaching, papers, PhD students etc. > > > Colleague: So, not", "international! > > > Colleague: Ha! Acafitoa? > > > Me: It's about", "the main goal of my life is to annoy as many people as", "a picture in the lab. > > > Colleague: Can't wait! > >", "world, especially outside fields like computer science or mathematics. And even if they", "goal of my life is to annoy as many people as possible. >", "to annoy as many people as possible. > > > Colleague: I know,", "a top user... I'll probably even [get a t-shirt](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2102/academia-top-user-swag)! > > > Colleague:", "Can't wait! > > > Hence, the titular question: do we have any", "fact that Acafitoa.SE, and the whole Stack Overflow network, might be totally unknown", "And even if they knew, they might be totally unimpressed. For instance, my", "that, another one of your nerdy sites > like [...]? > > >", "the titular question: do we have any data, even very rough, or general", "wear it. > > > Colleague: ... > > > Me: I'll ask", "> > > Hence, the titular question: do we have any data, even", "do you pester us and your students, but also them? > > >", "> > > Colleague: Ha! Acafitoa? > > > Me: It's about the", "Acafitoa.SE, and the whole Stack Overflow network, might be totally unknown to a", "> > > Me: It appears that I'm a top user... I'll probably", "do they listen to you? > > > Me: It appears that I'm", "nearest colleagues know about it just because they happened to look at my" ]
[ "the OP is not primarily looking for an answer to his question, but", "question, but mainly uses it as a vehicle to promote his services. Are", "we ok with this? And if not, what can we do? The question,", "Are we ok with this? And if not, what can we do? The", "do? The question, while rather uninteresting to me personally, does not really appear", "ok with this? And if not, what can we do? The question, while", "looking for an answer to his question, but mainly uses it as a", "not, what can we do? The question, while rather uninteresting to me personally,", "while rather uninteresting to me personally, does not really appear to be out", "we do? The question, while rather uninteresting to me personally, does not really", "his services. Are we ok with this? And if not, what can we", "a vehicle to promote his services. Are we ok with this? And if", "very strong suspicion that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62129/where-can-i-find-academics-who-need-statistical-help) is essentially a thinly veiled promotion for", "a thinly veiled promotion for the OP's business. That is, it seems to", "personally, does not really appear to be out of scope based on our", "for the OP's business. That is, it seems to me that the OP", "OP is not primarily looking for an answer to his question, but mainly", "is not primarily looking for an answer to his question, but mainly uses", "as a vehicle to promote his services. Are we ok with this? And", "The question, while rather uninteresting to me personally, does not really appear to", "his question, but mainly uses it as a vehicle to promote his services.", "services. Are we ok with this? And if not, what can we do?", "if not, what can we do? The question, while rather uninteresting to me", "me personally, does not really appear to be out of scope based on", "to me that the OP is not primarily looking for an answer to", "to his question, but mainly uses it as a vehicle to promote his", "is essentially a thinly veiled promotion for the OP's business. That is, it", "this? And if not, what can we do? The question, while rather uninteresting", "to promote his services. Are we ok with this? And if not, what", "primarily looking for an answer to his question, but mainly uses it as", "promote his services. Are we ok with this? And if not, what can", "rather uninteresting to me personally, does not really appear to be out of", "does not really appear to be out of scope based on our rules.", "have the very strong suspicion that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62129/where-can-i-find-academics-who-need-statistical-help) is essentially a thinly veiled", "business. That is, it seems to me that the OP is not primarily", "is, it seems to me that the OP is not primarily looking for", "answer to his question, but mainly uses it as a vehicle to promote", "mainly uses it as a vehicle to promote his services. Are we ok", "That is, it seems to me that the OP is not primarily looking", "for an answer to his question, but mainly uses it as a vehicle", "suspicion that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62129/where-can-i-find-academics-who-need-statistical-help) is essentially a thinly veiled promotion for the OP's", "can we do? The question, while rather uninteresting to me personally, does not", "to me personally, does not really appear to be out of scope based", "it as a vehicle to promote his services. Are we ok with this?", "OP's business. That is, it seems to me that the OP is not", "I have the very strong suspicion that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62129/where-can-i-find-academics-who-need-statistical-help) is essentially a thinly", "with this? And if not, what can we do? The question, while rather", "strong suspicion that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62129/where-can-i-find-academics-who-need-statistical-help) is essentially a thinly veiled promotion for the", "but mainly uses it as a vehicle to promote his services. Are we", "what can we do? The question, while rather uninteresting to me personally, does", "not primarily looking for an answer to his question, but mainly uses it", "essentially a thinly veiled promotion for the OP's business. That is, it seems", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62129/where-can-i-find-academics-who-need-statistical-help) is essentially a thinly veiled promotion for the OP's business. That is,", "that the OP is not primarily looking for an answer to his question,", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62129/where-can-i-find-academics-who-need-statistical-help) is essentially a thinly veiled promotion for the OP's business. That", "the very strong suspicion that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62129/where-can-i-find-academics-who-need-statistical-help) is essentially a thinly veiled promotion", "veiled promotion for the OP's business. That is, it seems to me that", "And if not, what can we do? The question, while rather uninteresting to", "uninteresting to me personally, does not really appear to be out of scope", "that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62129/where-can-i-find-academics-who-need-statistical-help) is essentially a thinly veiled promotion for the OP's business.", "it seems to me that the OP is not primarily looking for an", "an answer to his question, but mainly uses it as a vehicle to", "seems to me that the OP is not primarily looking for an answer", "vehicle to promote his services. Are we ok with this? And if not,", "question, while rather uninteresting to me personally, does not really appear to be", "uses it as a vehicle to promote his services. Are we ok with", "thinly veiled promotion for the OP's business. That is, it seems to me", "me that the OP is not primarily looking for an answer to his", "promotion for the OP's business. That is, it seems to me that the", "the OP's business. That is, it seems to me that the OP is" ]
[ "that read the site? (And would this be good or bad?) > >", "practice to use the blockquote syntax to highlight a tl;dr? > > >", "In [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62646/is-it-appropriate-for-an-undergrad-student-to-ask-a-professor-to-sign-a-non-disc/62658#62658) I used the blockquote markdown syntax to emphasize the few", "his comment got some upvotes. On the other hand, I've seen others using", "emphasize the few sentences that contain the gist of the answer. Zejereko Folona", "site? (And would this be good or bad?) > > > (He did", "practice, see, e.g. [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529), [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529) or [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529) So I like", "is bad practice to use the blockquote syntax to highlight a tl;dr? >", "A bit related: > > Would the use of blockquotes confuse some machines", "bit related: > > Would the use of blockquotes confuse some machines that", "read the site? (And would this be good or bad?) > > >", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529) or [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529) So I like to ask: > > Is is", "commented that this is bad practice and his comment got some upvotes. On", "> Would the use of blockquotes confuse some machines that read the site?", "that contain the gist of the answer. Zejereko Folona commented that this is", "> > Would the use of blockquotes confuse some machines that read the", "blockquote markdown syntax to emphasize the few sentences that contain the gist of", "[this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62646/is-it-appropriate-for-an-undergrad-student-to-ask-a-professor-to-sign-a-non-disc/62658#62658) I used the blockquote markdown syntax to emphasize the few sentences", "same practice, see, e.g. [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529), [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529) or [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529) So I", "(Oops, I did it again…) A bit related: > > Would the use", "> > > (Oops, I did it again…) A bit related: > >", "machines that read the site? (And would this be good or bad?) >", "seen others using the same practice, see, e.g. [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529), [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529) or", "e.g. [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529), [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529) or [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529) So I like to ask:", "syntax to highlight a tl;dr? > > > (Oops, I did it again…)", "or [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529) So I like to ask: > > Is is bad", "a tl;dr? > > > (Oops, I did it again…) A bit related:", "it again…) A bit related: > > Would the use of blockquotes confuse", "Folona commented that this is bad practice and his comment got some upvotes.", "the same practice, see, e.g. [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529), [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529) or [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529) So", "again…) A bit related: > > Would the use of blockquotes confuse some", "Would the use of blockquotes confuse some machines that read the site? (And", "I did it again…) A bit related: > > Would the use of", "upvotes. On the other hand, I've seen others using the same practice, see,", "> Is is bad practice to use the blockquote syntax to highlight a", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/62646/is-it-appropriate-for-an-undergrad-student-to-ask-a-professor-to-sign-a-non-disc/62658#62658) I used the blockquote markdown syntax to emphasize the few sentences that", "[this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529), [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529) or [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529) So I like to ask: >", "using the same practice, see, e.g. [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529), [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529) or [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529)", "of blockquotes confuse some machines that read the site? (And would this be", "got some upvotes. On the other hand, I've seen others using the same", "Is is bad practice to use the blockquote syntax to highlight a tl;dr?", "is bad practice and his comment got some upvotes. On the other hand,", "contain the gist of the answer. Zejereko Folona commented that this is bad", "did it again…) A bit related: > > Would the use of blockquotes", "the answer. Zejereko Folona commented that this is bad practice and his comment", "markdown syntax to emphasize the few sentences that contain the gist of the", "So I like to ask: > > Is is bad practice to use", "the use of blockquotes confuse some machines that read the site? (And would", "others using the same practice, see, e.g. [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529), [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529) or [this", "that this is bad practice and his comment got some upvotes. On the", "highlight a tl;dr? > > > (Oops, I did it again…) A bit", "related: > > Would the use of blockquotes confuse some machines that read", "Zejereko Folona commented that this is bad practice and his comment got some", "practice and his comment got some upvotes. On the other hand, I've seen", "some upvotes. On the other hand, I've seen others using the same practice,", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529) So I like to ask: > > Is is bad practice", "sentences that contain the gist of the answer. Zejereko Folona commented that this", "the blockquote syntax to highlight a tl;dr? > > > (Oops, I did", "some machines that read the site? (And would this be good or bad?)", "to highlight a tl;dr? > > > (Oops, I did it again…) A", "the few sentences that contain the gist of the answer. Zejereko Folona commented", "like to ask: > > Is is bad practice to use the blockquote", "the blockquote markdown syntax to emphasize the few sentences that contain the gist", "gist of the answer. Zejereko Folona commented that this is bad practice and", "other hand, I've seen others using the same practice, see, e.g. [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529),", "I like to ask: > > Is is bad practice to use the", "see, e.g. [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529), [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529) or [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529) So I like to", "bad practice to use the blockquote syntax to highlight a tl;dr? > >", "of the answer. Zejereko Folona commented that this is bad practice and his", "and his comment got some upvotes. On the other hand, I've seen others", "the site? (And would this be good or bad?) > > > (He", "answer. Zejereko Folona commented that this is bad practice and his comment got", "tl;dr? > > > (Oops, I did it again…) A bit related: >", "this is bad practice and his comment got some upvotes. On the other", "bad practice and his comment got some upvotes. On the other hand, I've", "> > Is is bad practice to use the blockquote syntax to highlight", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529), [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529) or [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529) So I like to ask: > >", "the other hand, I've seen others using the same practice, see, e.g. [this", "I used the blockquote markdown syntax to emphasize the few sentences that contain", "to ask: > > Is is bad practice to use the blockquote syntax", "blockquotes confuse some machines that read the site? (And would this be good", "to use the blockquote syntax to highlight a tl;dr? > > > (Oops,", "syntax to emphasize the few sentences that contain the gist of the answer.", "I've seen others using the same practice, see, e.g. [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529), [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529)", "hand, I've seen others using the same practice, see, e.g. [this answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/7973/529), [this", "> > (Oops, I did it again…) A bit related: > > Would", "use of blockquotes confuse some machines that read the site? (And would this", "would this be good or bad?) > > > (He did it again!)", "the gist of the answer. Zejereko Folona commented that this is bad practice", "few sentences that contain the gist of the answer. Zejereko Folona commented that", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529) So I like to ask: > > Is is bad practice to", "blockquote syntax to highlight a tl;dr? > > > (Oops, I did it", "On the other hand, I've seen others using the same practice, see, e.g.", "used the blockquote markdown syntax to emphasize the few sentences that contain the", "confuse some machines that read the site? (And would this be good or", "ask: > > Is is bad practice to use the blockquote syntax to", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60612/529) or [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/17988/529) So I like to ask: > > Is", "> (Oops, I did it again…) A bit related: > > Would the", "to emphasize the few sentences that contain the gist of the answer. Zejereko", "(And would this be good or bad?) > > > (He did it", "comment got some upvotes. On the other hand, I've seen others using the", "use the blockquote syntax to highlight a tl;dr? > > > (Oops, I" ]
[ "shared by other users of this site, or is it just me? ---", "talking about cases where, clearly, there can't be any research or publications about", "publish their results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643) etc. These questions typically do not get accepted answers because,", "ask opinion-based or discussion-like \"questions\" and systematically use the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged", "use of the tag to sneak through closing a bit annoying. Is that", "to ask opinion-based or discussion-like \"questions\" and systematically use the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions", "a bit annoying. Is that sentiment shared by other users of this site,", "subject such as: [Reference on how often \"To the best of our knowledge\"", "**Edit** I mean, seriously: [How often can the reviewers correctly guess the identity", "I'm not necessarily against us discussing these topics, I find the use of", "such research. While I'm not necessarily against us discussing these topics, I find", "the admitted graduates' grad school decision in the US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643) [What motivates researchers in", "such. I'm talking about cases where, clearly, there can't be any research or", "it just me? --- **Edit** I mean, seriously: [How often can the reviewers", "accepted answers because, well, there is no such research. While I'm not necessarily", "users like to ask opinion-based or discussion-like \"questions\" and systematically use the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request", "not get accepted answers because, well, there is no such research. While I'm", "about cases where, clearly, there can't be any research or publications about the", "I noticed some users like to ask opinion-based or discussion-like \"questions\" and systematically", "well, there is no such research. While I'm not necessarily against us discussing", "as such. I'm talking about cases where, clearly, there can't be any research", "admitted graduates' grad school decision in the US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643) [What motivates researchers in industry", "do not get accepted answers because, well, there is no such research. While", "there is no such research. While I'm not necessarily against us discussing these", "topics, I find the use of the tag to sneak through closing a", "tagged 'reference-request'\") tag to prevent them from being closed as such. I'm talking", "just me? --- **Edit** I mean, seriously: [How often can the reviewers correctly", "their results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643) etc. These questions typically do not get accepted answers because, well,", "can the reviewers correctly guess the identity of the authors when the review", "from being closed as such. I'm talking about cases where, clearly, there can't", "annoying. Is that sentiment shared by other users of this site, or is", "the tag to sneak through closing a bit annoying. Is that sentiment shared", "the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") tag to prevent them from being closed", "[How often can the reviewers correctly guess the identity of the authors when", "tag to prevent them from being closed as such. I'm talking about cases", "is it just me? --- **Edit** I mean, seriously: [How often can the", "discussion-like \"questions\" and systematically use the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") tag to", "motivates researchers in industry to publish their results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643) etc. These questions typically do", "school decision in the US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643) [What motivates researchers in industry to publish their", "[Impact of the visit weekend weather on the admitted graduates' grad school decision", "any research or publications about the subject such as: [Reference on how often", "as: [Reference on how often \"To the best of our knowledge\" assertions turn", "knowledge\" assertions turn out to be false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643) [Impact of the visit weekend weather", "Is that sentiment shared by other users of this site, or is it", "reviewers correctly guess the identity of the authors when the review is double-blind?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/62341/10643)", "I find the use of the tag to sneak through closing a bit", "research or publications about the subject such as: [Reference on how often \"To", "opinion-based or discussion-like \"questions\" and systematically use the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\")", "of the visit weekend weather on the admitted graduates' grad school decision in", "the US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643) [What motivates researchers in industry to publish their results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643) etc. These", "best of our knowledge\" assertions turn out to be false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643) [Impact of the", "results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643) etc. These questions typically do not get accepted answers because, well, there", "researchers in industry to publish their results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643) etc. These questions typically do not", "closed as such. I'm talking about cases where, clearly, there can't be any", "[Reference on how often \"To the best of our knowledge\" assertions turn out", "typically do not get accepted answers because, well, there is no such research.", "like to ask opinion-based or discussion-like \"questions\" and systematically use the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show", "get accepted answers because, well, there is no such research. While I'm not", "etc. These questions typically do not get accepted answers because, well, there is", "that sentiment shared by other users of this site, or is it just", "often \"To the best of our knowledge\" assertions turn out to be false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643)", "[What motivates researchers in industry to publish their results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643) etc. These questions typically", "some users like to ask opinion-based or discussion-like \"questions\" and systematically use the", "how often \"To the best of our knowledge\" assertions turn out to be", "\"questions\" and systematically use the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") tag to prevent", "on the admitted graduates' grad school decision in the US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643) [What motivates researchers", "no such research. While I'm not necessarily against us discussing these topics, I", "graduates' grad school decision in the US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643) [What motivates researchers in industry to", "mean, seriously: [How often can the reviewers correctly guess the identity of the", "or is it just me? --- **Edit** I mean, seriously: [How often can", "questions tagged 'reference-request'\") tag to prevent them from being closed as such. I'm", "us discussing these topics, I find the use of the tag to sneak", "often can the reviewers correctly guess the identity of the authors when the", "me? --- **Edit** I mean, seriously: [How often can the reviewers correctly guess", "closing a bit annoying. Is that sentiment shared by other users of this", "questions typically do not get accepted answers because, well, there is no such", "such as: [Reference on how often \"To the best of our knowledge\" assertions", "these topics, I find the use of the tag to sneak through closing", "can't be any research or publications about the subject such as: [Reference on", "of the tag to sneak through closing a bit annoying. Is that sentiment", "be any research or publications about the subject such as: [Reference on how", "tag to sneak through closing a bit annoying. Is that sentiment shared by", "discussing these topics, I find the use of the tag to sneak through", "be false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643) [Impact of the visit weekend weather on the admitted graduates' grad", "'reference-request'\") tag to prevent them from being closed as such. I'm talking about", "by other users of this site, or is it just me? --- **Edit**", "\"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") tag to prevent them from being closed as such.", "of our knowledge\" assertions turn out to be false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643) [Impact of the visit", "to prevent them from being closed as such. I'm talking about cases where,", "research. While I'm not necessarily against us discussing these topics, I find the", "to sneak through closing a bit annoying. Is that sentiment shared by other", "visit weekend weather on the admitted graduates' grad school decision in the US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643)", "assertions turn out to be false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643) [Impact of the visit weekend weather on", "out to be false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643) [Impact of the visit weekend weather on the admitted", "US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643) [What motivates researchers in industry to publish their results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643) etc. These questions", "the subject such as: [Reference on how often \"To the best of our", "is no such research. While I'm not necessarily against us discussing these topics,", "prevent them from being closed as such. I'm talking about cases where, clearly,", "weather on the admitted graduates' grad school decision in the US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643) [What motivates", "other users of this site, or is it just me? --- **Edit** I", "the best of our knowledge\" assertions turn out to be false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643) [Impact of", "site, or is it just me? --- **Edit** I mean, seriously: [How often", "cases where, clearly, there can't be any research or publications about the subject", "because, well, there is no such research. While I'm not necessarily against us", "grad school decision in the US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643) [What motivates researchers in industry to publish", "--- **Edit** I mean, seriously: [How often can the reviewers correctly guess the", "to be false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643) [Impact of the visit weekend weather on the admitted graduates'", "answers because, well, there is no such research. While I'm not necessarily against", "false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643) [Impact of the visit weekend weather on the admitted graduates' grad school", "publications about the subject such as: [Reference on how often \"To the best", "or publications about the subject such as: [Reference on how often \"To the", "necessarily against us discussing these topics, I find the use of the tag", "weekend weather on the admitted graduates' grad school decision in the US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643) [What", "there can't be any research or publications about the subject such as: [Reference", "turn out to be false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643) [Impact of the visit weekend weather on the", "or discussion-like \"questions\" and systematically use the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") tag", "systematically use the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") tag to prevent them from", "noticed some users like to ask opinion-based or discussion-like \"questions\" and systematically use", "being closed as such. I'm talking about cases where, clearly, there can't be", "These questions typically do not get accepted answers because, well, there is no", "against us discussing these topics, I find the use of the tag to", "sneak through closing a bit annoying. Is that sentiment shared by other users", "bit annoying. Is that sentiment shared by other users of this site, or", "this site, or is it just me? --- **Edit** I mean, seriously: [How", "use the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") tag to prevent them from being", "where, clearly, there can't be any research or publications about the subject such", "\"To the best of our knowledge\" assertions turn out to be false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643) [Impact", "While I'm not necessarily against us discussing these topics, I find the use", "[reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") tag to prevent them from being closed as", "our knowledge\" assertions turn out to be false](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32510/10643) [Impact of the visit weekend", "through closing a bit annoying. Is that sentiment shared by other users of", "in industry to publish their results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643) etc. These questions typically do not get", "users of this site, or is it just me? --- **Edit** I mean,", "them from being closed as such. I'm talking about cases where, clearly, there", "not necessarily against us discussing these topics, I find the use of the", "the reviewers correctly guess the identity of the authors when the review is", "clearly, there can't be any research or publications about the subject such as:", "sentiment shared by other users of this site, or is it just me?", "find the use of the tag to sneak through closing a bit annoying.", "I'm talking about cases where, clearly, there can't be any research or publications", "to publish their results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643) etc. These questions typically do not get accepted answers", "of this site, or is it just me? --- **Edit** I mean, seriously:", "I mean, seriously: [How often can the reviewers correctly guess the identity of", "about the subject such as: [Reference on how often \"To the best of", "in the US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643) [What motivates researchers in industry to publish their results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643) etc.", "industry to publish their results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643) etc. These questions typically do not get accepted", "the use of the tag to sneak through closing a bit annoying. Is", "the visit weekend weather on the admitted graduates' grad school decision in the", "on how often \"To the best of our knowledge\" assertions turn out to", "decision in the US](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/30031/10643) [What motivates researchers in industry to publish their results?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/32436/10643)", "seriously: [How often can the reviewers correctly guess the identity of the authors", "and systematically use the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") tag to prevent them" ]
[ "my first graduate level computer science course. Are questions related to appropriate expectations", "graduate level computer science course. Are questions related to appropriate expectations for incoming", "the curriculum for my first graduate level computer science course. Are questions related", "Are questions related to appropriate expectations for incoming knowledge and course coverage allowed", "course. Are questions related to appropriate expectations for incoming knowledge and course coverage", "first graduate level computer science course. Are questions related to appropriate expectations for", "I'm planning the curriculum for my first graduate level computer science course. Are", "level computer science course. Are questions related to appropriate expectations for incoming knowledge", "questions related to appropriate expectations for incoming knowledge and course coverage allowed here?", "for my first graduate level computer science course. Are questions related to appropriate", "science course. Are questions related to appropriate expectations for incoming knowledge and course", "computer science course. Are questions related to appropriate expectations for incoming knowledge and", "curriculum for my first graduate level computer science course. Are questions related to", "planning the curriculum for my first graduate level computer science course. Are questions" ]
[ "to download multiple articles from arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452) * [Bulk download Sci-Hub papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452) * [Bulk", "* [Bulk download of arXiv (or other publication data set) with metadata AND", "* [Bulk download Sci-Hub papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452) * [Bulk download of arXiv (or other publication", "some are open, so I wonder what the scope of this Stack Exchange", "questions on features offered by a website related to academic research on-topic? Some", "website related to academic research on-topic? Some are closed, some are open, so", "academic research on-topic? Some are closed, some are open, so I wonder what", "research on-topic? Some are closed, some are open, so I wonder what the", "by a website related to academic research on-topic? Some are closed, some are", "I wonder what the scope of this Stack Exchange website is on that", "the scope of this Stack Exchange website is on that kind of questions.", "scope of this Stack Exchange website is on that kind of questions. Examples:", "offered by a website related to academic research on-topic? Some are closed, some", "Exchange website is on that kind of questions. Examples: * [Is there a", "articles from arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452) * [Bulk download Sci-Hub papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452) * [Bulk download of arXiv", "Are questions on features offered by a website related to academic research on-topic?", "this Stack Exchange website is on that kind of questions. Examples: * [Is", "[Bulk download Sci-Hub papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452) * [Bulk download of arXiv (or other publication data", "papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452) * [Bulk download of arXiv (or other publication data set) with metadata", "a website related to academic research on-topic? Some are closed, some are open,", "way to download multiple articles from arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452) * [Bulk download Sci-Hub papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452) *", "kind of questions. Examples: * [Is there a more user-friendly way to download", "a more user-friendly way to download multiple articles from arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452) * [Bulk download", "from arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452) * [Bulk download Sci-Hub papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452) * [Bulk download of arXiv (or", "[Bulk download of arXiv (or other publication data set) with metadata AND citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/59093/452)", "questions. Examples: * [Is there a more user-friendly way to download multiple articles", "open, so I wonder what the scope of this Stack Exchange website is", "Examples: * [Is there a more user-friendly way to download multiple articles from", "related to academic research on-topic? Some are closed, some are open, so I", "on features offered by a website related to academic research on-topic? Some are", "website is on that kind of questions. Examples: * [Is there a more", "* [Is there a more user-friendly way to download multiple articles from arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452)", "on that kind of questions. Examples: * [Is there a more user-friendly way", "more user-friendly way to download multiple articles from arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452) * [Bulk download Sci-Hub", "wonder what the scope of this Stack Exchange website is on that kind", "Stack Exchange website is on that kind of questions. Examples: * [Is there", "arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452) * [Bulk download Sci-Hub papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452) * [Bulk download of arXiv (or other", "Sci-Hub papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452) * [Bulk download of arXiv (or other publication data set) with", "of questions. Examples: * [Is there a more user-friendly way to download multiple", "there a more user-friendly way to download multiple articles from arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452) * [Bulk", "[Is there a more user-friendly way to download multiple articles from arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452) *", "features offered by a website related to academic research on-topic? Some are closed,", "what the scope of this Stack Exchange website is on that kind of", "of this Stack Exchange website is on that kind of questions. Examples: *", "closed, some are open, so I wonder what the scope of this Stack", "download multiple articles from arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452) * [Bulk download Sci-Hub papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452) * [Bulk download", "are open, so I wonder what the scope of this Stack Exchange website", "on-topic? Some are closed, some are open, so I wonder what the scope", "download Sci-Hub papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452) * [Bulk download of arXiv (or other publication data set)", "that kind of questions. Examples: * [Is there a more user-friendly way to", "to academic research on-topic? Some are closed, some are open, so I wonder", "is on that kind of questions. Examples: * [Is there a more user-friendly", "are closed, some are open, so I wonder what the scope of this", "so I wonder what the scope of this Stack Exchange website is on", "user-friendly way to download multiple articles from arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452) * [Bulk download Sci-Hub papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452)", "Some are closed, some are open, so I wonder what the scope of", "multiple articles from arXiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/55626/452) * [Bulk download Sci-Hub papers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/63330/452) * [Bulk download of" ]
[ "needs to be expanded. At the moment, the [Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) section suggests not asking", "do the work for you. For instance, I'd think that a [good question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe),", "are explicitly about finding whether a prior research exists or not are shopping", "can argue that asking for a research topic should also be removed from", "you. For instance, I'd think that a [good question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe), on the other hand,", "a specific case), I suggest that the Shopping needs to be expanded. At", "So, a question that asks for providing evidence of prior research should be", "research topic should also be removed from the criteria since both are *asking*", "be removed from the criteria since both are *asking* (read: shopping) for guidance.", "asking for a topic or venue, but the research itelf). This is same", "This is same as asking others to do the work for you. For", "shopping](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) (in a specific case), I suggest that the Shopping needs to be", "research that have studied the the impact of such and > such? >", "existing research (i.e., not asking for a topic or venue, but the research", "on [defining shopping](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) (in a specific case), I suggest that the Shopping needs", "prior research should be treated as shopping question. A hypothetical example would be:", "or recommendations for a university, journal, or research > topic (a \"shopping question\")", "Shopping needs to be expanded. At the moment, the [Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) section suggests not", "finding whether a prior research exists or not are shopping for ideas. So,", "I'd think that a [good question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe), on the other hand, asks for a", "that asking for a research topic should also be removed from the criteria", "> > > On the other hand, if the above does not fall", "hand, if the above does not fall under shopping, then, one can argue", "same thing asking about existing research (i.e., not asking for a topic or", "that a [good question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe), on the other hand, asks for a specific information.", "case), I suggest that the Shopping needs to be expanded. At the moment,", "also be removed from the criteria since both are *asking* (read: shopping) for", "asking about existing research (i.e., not asking for a topic or venue, but", "other hand, asks for a specific information. Questions that are explicitly about finding", "if the above does not fall under shopping, then, one can argue that", "the [Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) section suggests not asking shopping questions of certain types: > >", "(in a specific case), I suggest that the Shopping needs to be expanded.", "At the moment, the [Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) section suggests not asking shopping questions of certain", "very same thing asking about existing research (i.e., not asking for a topic", "are shopping for ideas. So, a question that asks for providing evidence of", "shopping question. A hypothetical example would be: > > Is there any research", "the very same thing asking about existing research (i.e., not asking for a", "be: > > Is there any research that have studied the the impact", "above does not fall under shopping, then, one can argue that asking for", "research exists or not are shopping for ideas. So, a question that asks", "specific case), I suggest that the Shopping needs to be expanded. At the", "research > topic (a \"shopping question\") > > > However, often there are", "but the research itelf). This is same as asking others to do the", "a topic or venue, but the research itelf). This is same as asking", "exists or not are shopping for ideas. So, a question that asks for", "a [good question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe), on the other hand, asks for a specific information. Questions", "not are shopping for ideas. So, a question that asks for providing evidence", "topic (a \"shopping question\") > > > However, often there are questions doing", "about finding whether a prior research exists or not are shopping for ideas.", "the Shopping needs to be expanded. At the moment, the [Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) section suggests", "should also be removed from the criteria since both are *asking* (read: shopping)", "questions doing the very same thing asking about existing research (i.e., not asking", "evidence of prior research should be treated as shopping question. A hypothetical example", "then, one can argue that asking for a research topic should also be", "thing asking about existing research (i.e., not asking for a topic or venue,", "suggests not asking shopping questions of certain types: > > Suggestions or recommendations", "> > Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research > topic", "doing the very same thing asking about existing research (i.e., not asking for", "example would be: > > Is there any research that have studied the", "that asks for providing evidence of prior research should be treated as shopping", "[Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) section suggests not asking shopping questions of certain types: > > Suggestions", "for a specific information. Questions that are explicitly about finding whether a prior", "for a topic or venue, but the research itelf). This is same as", "research (i.e., not asking for a topic or venue, but the research itelf).", "topic or venue, but the research itelf). This is same as asking others", "Based on earlier [discussions](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) on [defining shopping](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) (in a specific case), I suggest", "does not fall under shopping, then, one can argue that asking for a", "a question that asks for providing evidence of prior research should be treated", "to be expanded. At the moment, the [Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) section suggests not asking shopping", "the research itelf). This is same as asking others to do the work", "section suggests not asking shopping questions of certain types: > > Suggestions or", "earlier [discussions](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) on [defining shopping](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) (in a specific case), I suggest that the", "venue, but the research itelf). This is same as asking others to do", "question. A hypothetical example would be: > > Is there any research that", "hand, asks for a specific information. Questions that are explicitly about finding whether", "the the impact of such and > such? > > > On the", "the above does not fall under shopping, then, one can argue that asking", "for a research topic should also be removed from the criteria since both", "ideas. So, a question that asks for providing evidence of prior research should", "would be: > > Is there any research that have studied the the", "asking for a research topic should also be removed from the criteria since", "explicitly about finding whether a prior research exists or not are shopping for", "for providing evidence of prior research should be treated as shopping question. A", "> topic (a \"shopping question\") > > > However, often there are questions", "research should be treated as shopping question. A hypothetical example would be: >", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe), on the other hand, asks for a specific information. Questions that are", "providing evidence of prior research should be treated as shopping question. A hypothetical", "Is there any research that have studied the the impact of such and", "shopping questions of certain types: > > Suggestions or recommendations for a university,", "> Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research > topic (a", "asks for a specific information. Questions that are explicitly about finding whether a", "shopping, then, one can argue that asking for a research topic should also", "there are questions doing the very same thing asking about existing research (i.e.,", "of such and > such? > > > On the other hand, if", "topic should also be removed from the criteria since both are *asking* (read:", "studied the the impact of such and > such? > > > On", "treated as shopping question. A hypothetical example would be: > > Is there", "often there are questions doing the very same thing asking about existing research", "hypothetical example would be: > > Is there any research that have studied", "on earlier [discussions](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) on [defining shopping](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) (in a specific case), I suggest that", "be expanded. At the moment, the [Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) section suggests not asking shopping questions", "university, journal, or research > topic (a \"shopping question\") > > > However,", "> However, often there are questions doing the very same thing asking about", "(i.e., not asking for a topic or venue, but the research itelf). This", "For instance, I'd think that a [good question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe), on the other hand, asks", "that are explicitly about finding whether a prior research exists or not are", "(a \"shopping question\") > > > However, often there are questions doing the", "question\") > > > However, often there are questions doing the very same", "instance, I'd think that a [good question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe), on the other hand, asks for", "[good question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe), on the other hand, asks for a specific information. Questions that", "suggest that the Shopping needs to be expanded. At the moment, the [Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)", "Questions that are explicitly about finding whether a prior research exists or not", "there any research that have studied the the impact of such and >", "on the other hand, asks for a specific information. Questions that are explicitly", "any research that have studied the the impact of such and > such?", "impact of such and > such? > > > On the other hand,", "asking others to do the work for you. For instance, I'd think that", "same as asking others to do the work for you. For instance, I'd", "specific information. Questions that are explicitly about finding whether a prior research exists", "research itelf). This is same as asking others to do the work for", "> > Is there any research that have studied the the impact of", "journal, or research > topic (a \"shopping question\") > > > However, often", "have studied the the impact of such and > such? > > >", "whether a prior research exists or not are shopping for ideas. So, a", "I suggest that the Shopping needs to be expanded. At the moment, the", "questions of certain types: > > Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal,", "is same as asking others to do the work for you. For instance,", "or not are shopping for ideas. So, a question that asks for providing", "a research topic should also be removed from the criteria since both are", "fall under shopping, then, one can argue that asking for a research topic", "argue that asking for a research topic should also be removed from the", "should be treated as shopping question. A hypothetical example would be: > >", "expanded. At the moment, the [Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) section suggests not asking shopping questions of", "asks for providing evidence of prior research should be treated as shopping question.", "not asking for a topic or venue, but the research itelf). This is", "asking shopping questions of certain types: > > Suggestions or recommendations for a", "of prior research should be treated as shopping question. A hypothetical example would", "itelf). This is same as asking others to do the work for you.", "for ideas. So, a question that asks for providing evidence of prior research", "as asking others to do the work for you. For instance, I'd think", "or research > topic (a \"shopping question\") > > > However, often there", "as shopping question. A hypothetical example would be: > > Is there any", "> On the other hand, if the above does not fall under shopping,", "work for you. For instance, I'd think that a [good question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe), on the", "that the Shopping needs to be expanded. At the moment, the [Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) section", "a prior research exists or not are shopping for ideas. So, a question", "> > > However, often there are questions doing the very same thing", "one can argue that asking for a research topic should also be removed", "the work for you. For instance, I'd think that a [good question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe), on", "the other hand, if the above does not fall under shopping, then, one", "for you. For instance, I'd think that a [good question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe), on the other", "are questions doing the very same thing asking about existing research (i.e., not", "and > such? > > > On the other hand, if the above", "under shopping, then, one can argue that asking for a research topic should", "not fall under shopping, then, one can argue that asking for a research", "prior research exists or not are shopping for ideas. So, a question that", "> Is there any research that have studied the the impact of such", "the other hand, asks for a specific information. Questions that are explicitly about", "that have studied the the impact of such and > such? > >", "moment, the [Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) section suggests not asking shopping questions of certain types: >", "a specific information. Questions that are explicitly about finding whether a prior research", "types: > > Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research >", "about existing research (i.e., not asking for a topic or venue, but the", "question that asks for providing evidence of prior research should be treated as", "Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research > topic (a \"shopping", "However, often there are questions doing the very same thing asking about existing", "> > On the other hand, if the above does not fall under", "certain types: > > Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or research", "other hand, if the above does not fall under shopping, then, one can", "such? > > > On the other hand, if the above does not", "shopping for ideas. So, a question that asks for providing evidence of prior", "On the other hand, if the above does not fall under shopping, then,", "for a university, journal, or research > topic (a \"shopping question\") > >", "the impact of such and > such? > > > On the other", "not asking shopping questions of certain types: > > Suggestions or recommendations for", "to do the work for you. For instance, I'd think that a [good", "such and > such? > > > On the other hand, if the", "[defining shopping](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) (in a specific case), I suggest that the Shopping needs to", "or venue, but the research itelf). This is same as asking others to", "be treated as shopping question. A hypothetical example would be: > > Is", "the moment, the [Asking](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) section suggests not asking shopping questions of certain types:", "> > However, often there are questions doing the very same thing asking", "> such? > > > On the other hand, if the above does", "a university, journal, or research > topic (a \"shopping question\") > > >", "[discussions](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) on [defining shopping](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) (in a specific case), I suggest that the Shopping", "of certain types: > > Suggestions or recommendations for a university, journal, or", "information. Questions that are explicitly about finding whether a prior research exists or", "\"shopping question\") > > > However, often there are questions doing the very", "A hypothetical example would be: > > Is there any research that have", "recommendations for a university, journal, or research > topic (a \"shopping question\") >", "think that a [good question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49163/what-rough-percentage-of-universities-required-ancient-greek-and-latin-from-whe), on the other hand, asks for a specific", "others to do the work for you. For instance, I'd think that a" ]
[ "a bad question\", and indeed, one reason to think something is a bad", "mean \"I think this is a bad question\", and indeed, one reason to", "down-votes mean \"I think this is a bad question\", and indeed, one reason", "postings by the same author with different new accounts. The first two (less", "of voters because it was the third in a sequence of effectively duplicate", "is a bad question is because the person just asked the question already.", "received a number of rapid down-votes, which I guess was likely due to", "\"I think this is a bad question\", and indeed, one reason to think", "of effectively duplicate postings by the same author with different new accounts. The", "the question, not its context. Bad questioner behavior should instead be addressed through", "which I guess was likely due to annoyance of voters because it was", "the person just asked the question already. * Argument against: votes should be", "remain on the third. In comments, a question was raised: should down-votes be", "reason to think something is a bad question is because the person just", "new accounts. The first two (less coherent versions) have since been deleted, but", "the down-votes remain on the third. In comments, a question was raised: should", "two (less coherent versions) have since been deleted, but the down-votes remain on", "indeed, one reason to think something is a bad question is because the", "just asked the question already. * Argument against: votes should be on the", "is because the person just asked the question already. * Argument against: votes", "voters because it was the third in a sequence of effectively duplicate postings", "with different new accounts. The first two (less coherent versions) have since been", "I see an argument either way: * Argument for: down-votes mean \"I think", "in a sequence of effectively duplicate postings by the same author with different", "sequence of effectively duplicate postings by the same author with different new accounts.", "The first two (less coherent versions) have since been deleted, but the down-votes", "an argument either way: * Argument for: down-votes mean \"I think this is", "way: * Argument for: down-votes mean \"I think this is a bad question\",", "either way: * Argument for: down-votes mean \"I think this is a bad", "the question already. * Argument against: votes should be on the question, not", "this is a bad question\", and indeed, one reason to think something is", "for: down-votes mean \"I think this is a bad question\", and indeed, one", "recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/64430/22733) received a number of rapid down-votes, which I guess was likely", "since been deleted, but the down-votes remain on the third. In comments, a", "was raised: should down-votes be used to publish bad behavior by a questioner?", "bad question\", and indeed, one reason to think something is a bad question", "down-votes be used to publish bad behavior by a questioner? I see an", "have since been deleted, but the down-votes remain on the third. In comments,", "to publish bad behavior by a questioner? I see an argument either way:", "bad behavior by a questioner? I see an argument either way: * Argument", "third. In comments, a question was raised: should down-votes be used to publish", "questioner? I see an argument either way: * Argument for: down-votes mean \"I", "publish bad behavior by a questioner? I see an argument either way: *", "asked the question already. * Argument against: votes should be on the question,", "coherent versions) have since been deleted, but the down-votes remain on the third.", "should be on the question, not its context. Bad questioner behavior should instead", "different new accounts. The first two (less coherent versions) have since been deleted,", "by the same author with different new accounts. The first two (less coherent", "one reason to think something is a bad question is because the person", "bad question is because the person just asked the question already. * Argument", "question was raised: should down-votes be used to publish bad behavior by a", "be used to publish bad behavior by a questioner? I see an argument", "[A recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/64430/22733) received a number of rapid down-votes, which I guess was", "due to annoyance of voters because it was the third in a sequence", "was likely due to annoyance of voters because it was the third in", "down-votes, which I guess was likely due to annoyance of voters because it", "was the third in a sequence of effectively duplicate postings by the same", "a question was raised: should down-votes be used to publish bad behavior by", "argument either way: * Argument for: down-votes mean \"I think this is a", "already. * Argument against: votes should be on the question, not its context.", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/64430/22733) received a number of rapid down-votes, which I guess was likely due", "raised: should down-votes be used to publish bad behavior by a questioner? I", "used to publish bad behavior by a questioner? I see an argument either", "rapid down-votes, which I guess was likely due to annoyance of voters because", "* Argument against: votes should be on the question, not its context. Bad", "likely due to annoyance of voters because it was the third in a", "third in a sequence of effectively duplicate postings by the same author with", "effectively duplicate postings by the same author with different new accounts. The first", "number of rapid down-votes, which I guess was likely due to annoyance of", "a questioner? I see an argument either way: * Argument for: down-votes mean", "the same author with different new accounts. The first two (less coherent versions)", "the third in a sequence of effectively duplicate postings by the same author", "Argument against: votes should be on the question, not its context. Bad questioner", "to think something is a bad question is because the person just asked", "a sequence of effectively duplicate postings by the same author with different new", "been deleted, but the down-votes remain on the third. In comments, a question", "it was the third in a sequence of effectively duplicate postings by the", "think this is a bad question\", and indeed, one reason to think something", "annoyance of voters because it was the third in a sequence of effectively", "think something is a bad question is because the person just asked the", "question\", and indeed, one reason to think something is a bad question is", "duplicate postings by the same author with different new accounts. The first two", "the third. In comments, a question was raised: should down-votes be used to", "first two (less coherent versions) have since been deleted, but the down-votes remain", "In comments, a question was raised: should down-votes be used to publish bad", "against: votes should be on the question, not its context. Bad questioner behavior", "Argument for: down-votes mean \"I think this is a bad question\", and indeed,", "see an argument either way: * Argument for: down-votes mean \"I think this", "behavior by a questioner? I see an argument either way: * Argument for:", "to annoyance of voters because it was the third in a sequence of", "is a bad question\", and indeed, one reason to think something is a", "comments, a question was raised: should down-votes be used to publish bad behavior", "question already. * Argument against: votes should be on the question, not its", "votes should be on the question, not its context. Bad questioner behavior should", "versions) have since been deleted, but the down-votes remain on the third. In", "on the third. In comments, a question was raised: should down-votes be used", "down-votes remain on the third. In comments, a question was raised: should down-votes", "accounts. The first two (less coherent versions) have since been deleted, but the", "I guess was likely due to annoyance of voters because it was the", "question, not its context. Bad questioner behavior should instead be addressed through flags.", "person just asked the question already. * Argument against: votes should be on", "something is a bad question is because the person just asked the question", "because it was the third in a sequence of effectively duplicate postings by", "and indeed, one reason to think something is a bad question is because", "same author with different new accounts. The first two (less coherent versions) have", "guess was likely due to annoyance of voters because it was the third", "by a questioner? I see an argument either way: * Argument for: down-votes", "of rapid down-votes, which I guess was likely due to annoyance of voters", "but the down-votes remain on the third. In comments, a question was raised:", "be on the question, not its context. Bad questioner behavior should instead be", "should down-votes be used to publish bad behavior by a questioner? I see", "on the question, not its context. Bad questioner behavior should instead be addressed", "because the person just asked the question already. * Argument against: votes should", "question is because the person just asked the question already. * Argument against:", "a number of rapid down-votes, which I guess was likely due to annoyance", "(less coherent versions) have since been deleted, but the down-votes remain on the", "a bad question is because the person just asked the question already. *", "author with different new accounts. The first two (less coherent versions) have since", "deleted, but the down-votes remain on the third. In comments, a question was", "* Argument for: down-votes mean \"I think this is a bad question\", and" ]
[ "use an *h-index*-style to indicate SE users performance. As with publications, it gives", "246 votes will have an *h-index* of 1 (although both has same number", "it gives a direct indication of activity level and users interest. The *h-index*", "arranging the answers in descending order and stopping at the answer that has", "an equal number or higher of votes as its order. For example, a", "(for example) is calculated by arranging the answers in descending order and stopping", "2, 2, 1 will have an *h-index* of 10, while a user with", "10, 10, 8, 4, 2, 2, 1 will have an *h-index* of 10,", "with 15 answers with the following votes: 50, 43, 42, 20, 15, 14,", "*h-index*-style to indicate SE users performance. As with publications, it gives a direct", "stopping at the answer that has an equal number or higher of votes", "a direct indication of activity level and users interest. The *h-index* for answers", "SE users performance. As with publications, it gives a direct indication of activity", "users performance. As with publications, it gives a direct indication of activity level", "*h-index* of 10, while a user with 1 answer of 246 votes will", "have an *h-index* of 10, while a user with 1 answer of 246", "the answers in descending order and stopping at the answer that has an", "and users interest. The *h-index* for answers (for example) is calculated by arranging", "number or higher of votes as its order. For example, a user with", "publications, it gives a direct indication of activity level and users interest. The", "with 1 answer of 246 votes will have an *h-index* of 1 (although", "has an equal number or higher of votes as its order. For example,", "50, 43, 42, 20, 15, 14, 14, 11, 10, 10, 8, 4, 2,", "I suggest to use an *h-index*-style to indicate SE users performance. As with", "The *h-index* for answers (for example) is calculated by arranging the answers in", "for answers (for example) is calculated by arranging the answers in descending order", "descending order and stopping at the answer that has an equal number or", "votes as its order. For example, a user with 15 answers with the", "answers in descending order and stopping at the answer that has an equal", "while a user with 1 answer of 246 votes will have an *h-index*", "level and users interest. The *h-index* for answers (for example) is calculated by", "the following votes: 50, 43, 42, 20, 15, 14, 14, 11, 10, 10,", "will have an *h-index* of 1 (although both has same number of total", "equal number or higher of votes as its order. For example, a user", "of activity level and users interest. The *h-index* for answers (for example) is", "of votes as its order. For example, a user with 15 answers with", "an *h-index*-style to indicate SE users performance. As with publications, it gives a", "is calculated by arranging the answers in descending order and stopping at the", "a user with 15 answers with the following votes: 50, 43, 42, 20,", "2, 1 will have an *h-index* of 10, while a user with 1", "gives a direct indication of activity level and users interest. The *h-index* for", "of 246 votes will have an *h-index* of 1 (although both has same", "votes will have an *h-index* of 1 (although both has same number of", "interest. The *h-index* for answers (for example) is calculated by arranging the answers", "activity level and users interest. The *h-index* for answers (for example) is calculated", "example, a user with 15 answers with the following votes: 50, 43, 42,", "10, while a user with 1 answer of 246 votes will have an", "performance. As with publications, it gives a direct indication of activity level and", "by arranging the answers in descending order and stopping at the answer that", "suggest to use an *h-index*-style to indicate SE users performance. As with publications,", "or higher of votes as its order. For example, a user with 15", "15, 14, 14, 11, 10, 10, 8, 4, 2, 2, 1 will have", "20, 15, 14, 14, 11, 10, 10, 8, 4, 2, 2, 1 will", "indication of activity level and users interest. The *h-index* for answers (for example)", "1 will have an *h-index* of 10, while a user with 1 answer", "an *h-index* of 10, while a user with 1 answer of 246 votes", "users interest. The *h-index* for answers (for example) is calculated by arranging the", "will have an *h-index* of 10, while a user with 1 answer of", "with publications, it gives a direct indication of activity level and users interest.", "direct indication of activity level and users interest. The *h-index* for answers (for", "higher of votes as its order. For example, a user with 15 answers", "As with publications, it gives a direct indication of activity level and users", "have an *h-index* of 1 (although both has same number of total votes).", "user with 1 answer of 246 votes will have an *h-index* of 1", "10, 8, 4, 2, 2, 1 will have an *h-index* of 10, while", "that has an equal number or higher of votes as its order. For", "votes: 50, 43, 42, 20, 15, 14, 14, 11, 10, 10, 8, 4,", "user with 15 answers with the following votes: 50, 43, 42, 20, 15,", "example) is calculated by arranging the answers in descending order and stopping at", "to indicate SE users performance. As with publications, it gives a direct indication", "to use an *h-index*-style to indicate SE users performance. As with publications, it", "For example, a user with 15 answers with the following votes: 50, 43,", "of 10, while a user with 1 answer of 246 votes will have", "at the answer that has an equal number or higher of votes as", "8, 4, 2, 2, 1 will have an *h-index* of 10, while a", "*h-index* for answers (for example) is calculated by arranging the answers in descending", "14, 11, 10, 10, 8, 4, 2, 2, 1 will have an *h-index*", "as its order. For example, a user with 15 answers with the following", "its order. For example, a user with 15 answers with the following votes:", "answers (for example) is calculated by arranging the answers in descending order and", "the answer that has an equal number or higher of votes as its", "answer that has an equal number or higher of votes as its order.", "order. For example, a user with 15 answers with the following votes: 50,", "15 answers with the following votes: 50, 43, 42, 20, 15, 14, 14,", "with the following votes: 50, 43, 42, 20, 15, 14, 14, 11, 10,", "4, 2, 2, 1 will have an *h-index* of 10, while a user", "in descending order and stopping at the answer that has an equal number", "1 answer of 246 votes will have an *h-index* of 1 (although both", "indicate SE users performance. As with publications, it gives a direct indication of", "42, 20, 15, 14, 14, 11, 10, 10, 8, 4, 2, 2, 1", "order and stopping at the answer that has an equal number or higher", "14, 14, 11, 10, 10, 8, 4, 2, 2, 1 will have an", "43, 42, 20, 15, 14, 14, 11, 10, 10, 8, 4, 2, 2,", "following votes: 50, 43, 42, 20, 15, 14, 14, 11, 10, 10, 8,", "answers with the following votes: 50, 43, 42, 20, 15, 14, 14, 11,", "and stopping at the answer that has an equal number or higher of", "calculated by arranging the answers in descending order and stopping at the answer", "a user with 1 answer of 246 votes will have an *h-index* of", "answer of 246 votes will have an *h-index* of 1 (although both has", "11, 10, 10, 8, 4, 2, 2, 1 will have an *h-index* of" ]
[ "PhD; that is, other questions pertaining to the graduate student lifestyle. In my", "to my second point, I am eager to understand how we can fix", "vehement arguments as to whether or not it was considered on-topic or well-posed,", "of raising a puppy, let's say, is too detrimental to research or if", "increase productivity by providing companionship during a trying process. This topic provoked some", "are obviously too broad and vague, for \"work-life-balance\" questions on Academia, they actually", "should be valid are closed quickly. It often seems that the idea of", "to the graduate student lifestyle. In my question I linked to these. **The", "On many occasions duplicates, hyper-specific questions, and other violations of the help center's", "closed quickly. It often seems that the idea of \"relying on the community\"", "not it was considered on-topic or well-posed, as evidenced by the commentary and", "users abide by the defined guidelines of the site. I would argue that", "have developed their own opinions as to a questions validity, and, to be", "as a PhD student\" as within the scope of the Academia site, and", "to a questions validity, and, to be honest, I think it's one that", "their own opinions as to a questions validity, and, to be honest, I", "by the commentary and oddly balanced number of up/down votes. Even though the", "to research or if it can in fact increase productivity by providing companionship", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65062/getting-a-pet-during-a-phd) asking whether or not it is advised to get a pet during", "be fine, I believe there is an inherent arbitrariness to that method. For", "result, the bar for entry ends up being inappropriately raised and shifted away", "during my PhD and I think having a canine companion could help me", "a high-profile user warned that the question veered into \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\" territory. The", "provoked some pretty vehement arguments as to whether or not it was considered", "one, I would like to have my original pet post reopened. I have", "experiences as to whether it may be ill-advised to do so. 2. Secondly,", "in fact increase productivity by providing companionship during a trying process. This topic", "a result, the bar for entry ends up being inappropriately raised and shifted", "by the defined guidelines of the site. I would argue that often long-time", "answered, while other times questions that seem that they should be valid are", "topic provoked some pretty vehement arguments as to whether or not it was", "pertaining to the graduate student lifestyle. In my question I linked to these.", "and other violations of the help center's policies stay open and are answered,", "stated by the terms of the site. **Question** Is there any disagreement to", "productivity by providing companionship during a trying process. This topic provoked some pretty", "as to whether it may be ill-advised to do so. 2. Secondly, I", "honest, I think it's one that is often biased by viewing a lot", "is twofold:** 1. For one, I would like to have my original pet", "pet post reopened. I have struggled with wasting time due to a sort", "my second point, I am eager to understand how we can fix this,", "Academia site, and the \"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\" tag exists to cluster these types of questions,", "what is stated by the terms of the site. **Question** Is there any", "that is often biased by viewing a lot of crappy posts. As a", "have my original pet post reopened. I have struggled with wasting time due", "opinions as to a questions validity, and, to be honest, I think it's", "to these points? If to my first point, please articulate why my post", "stack overflow boat-programming-type questions are obviously too broad and vague, for \"work-life-balance\" questions", "reopened. I have struggled with wasting time due to a sort of \"isolation", "and the \"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\" tag exists to cluster these types of questions, many close", "do so. 2. Secondly, I would like to start a conversation about the", "point of this meta post is twofold:** 1. For one, I would like", "often biased by viewing a lot of crappy posts. As a result, the", "to cluster these types of questions, many close votes followed after a high-profile", "we can fix this, whether by appealing to change the stated site rules", "votes. Even though the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions) explicitly names questions about \"life as a", "**Question** Is there any disagreement to these points? If to my first point,", "of that funk, but first I would like to hear from the community's", "they actually seem relevant, if not appropriate. Furthermore, there is a strong precedent", "relevant, if not appropriate. Furthermore, there is a strong precedent for these kinds", "how we can fix this, whether by appealing to change the stated site", "PhD process. The major premise was if the time/energy-cost of raising a puppy,", "what really seems like a follow-the-leader effect. While I understand the boat programming", "on-topic or well-posed, as evidenced by the commentary and oddly balanced number of", "premise was if the time/energy-cost of raising a puppy, let's say, is too", "any disagreement to these points? If to my first point, please articulate why", "While in theory that should be fine, I believe there is an inherent", "recently posed [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65062/getting-a-pet-during-a-phd) asking whether or not it is advised to get", "fine, I believe there is an inherent arbitrariness to that method. For one,", "disagreement to these points? If to my first point, please articulate why my", "and [kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1) during a PhD; that is, other questions pertaining to the graduate", "think having a canine companion could help me break out of that funk,", "I believe there is an inherent arbitrariness to that method. For one, this", "post was off-topic and justify it with a clear guideline. If to my", "post. But more importantly, it also assumes that these users abide by the", "other times questions that seem that they should be valid are closed quickly.", "or well-posed, as evidenced by the commentary and oddly balanced number of up/down", "a follow-the-leader effect. While I understand the boat programming concern, and on stack", "names questions about \"life as a PhD student\" as within the scope of", "the boat programming concern, and on stack overflow boat-programming-type questions are obviously too", "site. **Question** Is there any disagreement to these points? If to my first", "a puppy, let's say, is too detrimental to research or if it can", "not appropriate. Furthermore, there is a strong precedent for these kinds of questions", "other violations of the help center's policies stay open and are answered, while", "to start a conversation about the whimsicality of close votes. On many occasions", "funk, but first I would like to hear from the community's experiences as", "get a pet during the PhD process. The major premise was if the", "high-profile user warned that the question veered into \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\" territory. The consequence", "eager to understand how we can fix this, whether by appealing to change", "votes. On many occasions duplicates, hyper-specific questions, and other violations of the help", "an inherent arbitrariness to that method. For one, this process assumes that these", "a canine companion could help me break out of that funk, but first", "\"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\" territory. The consequence of that post was a lot close votes", "user warned that the question veered into \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\" territory. The consequence of", "the defined guidelines of the site. I would argue that often long-time users", "these users abide by the defined guidelines of the site. I would argue", "of close votes. On many occasions duplicates, hyper-specific questions, and other violations of", "it also assumes that these users abide by the defined guidelines of the", "help center's policies stay open and are answered, while other times questions that", "and I think having a canine companion could help me break out of", "canine companion could help me break out of that funk, but first I", "other questions pertaining to the graduate student lifestyle. In my question I linked", "close and others follow suit. While in theory that should be fine, I", "whether by appealing to change the stated site rules or by adjusting the", "should be fine, I believe there is an inherent arbitrariness to that method.", "lot of crappy posts. As a result, the bar for entry ends up", "the idea of \"relying on the community\" devolves into follow-the-leader: a high-reputation user", "and oddly balanced number of up/down votes. Even though the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions) explicitly", "PhD and I think having a canine companion could help me break out", "believe there is an inherent arbitrariness to that method. For one, this process", "followed after a high-profile user warned that the question veered into \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\"", "like to have my original pet post reopened. I have struggled with wasting", "effect. While I understand the boat programming concern, and on stack overflow boat-programming-type", "I would argue that often long-time users have developed their own opinions as", "that the question veered into \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\" territory. The consequence of that post", "one that is often biased by viewing a lot of crappy posts. As", "like to start a conversation about the whimsicality of close votes. On many", "process. The major premise was if the time/energy-cost of raising a puppy, let's", "that post was a lot close votes in what really seems like a", "often long-time users have developed their own opinions as to a questions validity,", "struggled with wasting time due to a sort of \"isolation daze\" during my", "by the terms of the site. **Question** Is there any disagreement to these", "shifted away from what is stated by the terms of the site. **Question**", "the PhD process. The major premise was if the time/energy-cost of raising a", "\"relying on the community\" devolves into follow-the-leader: a high-reputation user votes to close", "PhD student\" as within the scope of the Academia site, and the \"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\"", "or if it can in fact increase productivity by providing companionship during a", "\"isolation daze\" during my PhD and I think having a canine companion could", "these leaders see every post. But more importantly, it also assumes that these", "tag exists to cluster these types of questions, many close votes followed after", "see every post. But more importantly, it also assumes that these users abide", "I recently posed [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65062/getting-a-pet-during-a-phd) asking whether or not it is advised to", "I am eager to understand how we can fix this, whether by appealing", "first point, please articulate why my post was off-topic and justify it with", "crappy posts. As a result, the bar for entry ends up being inappropriately", "these. **The point of this meta post is twofold:** 1. For one, I", "\"work-life-balance\" questions on Academia, they actually seem relevant, if not appropriate. Furthermore, there", "that they should be valid are closed quickly. It often seems that the", "the ones inquiring about [marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1) and [kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1) during a PhD; that is, other", "the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions) explicitly names questions about \"life as a PhD student\" as", "are answered, while other times questions that seem that they should be valid", "it was considered on-topic or well-posed, as evidenced by the commentary and oddly", "center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions) explicitly names questions about \"life as a PhD student\" as within the", "I think having a canine companion could help me break out of that", "sort of \"isolation daze\" during my PhD and I think having a canine", "meta post is twofold:** 1. For one, I would like to have my", "the graduate student lifestyle. In my question I linked to these. **The point", "of up/down votes. Even though the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions) explicitly names questions about \"life", "center's policies stay open and are answered, while other times questions that seem", "was a lot close votes in what really seems like a follow-the-leader effect.", "questions on Academia, they actually seem relevant, if not appropriate. Furthermore, there is", "of questions in Academia, primarily the ones inquiring about [marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1) and [kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1) during", "like to hear from the community's experiences as to whether it may be", "be valid are closed quickly. It often seems that the idea of \"relying", "that often long-time users have developed their own opinions as to a questions", "validity, and, to be honest, I think it's one that is often biased", "be honest, I think it's one that is often biased by viewing a", "original pet post reopened. I have struggled with wasting time due to a", "cluster these types of questions, many close votes followed after a high-profile user", "major premise was if the time/energy-cost of raising a puppy, let's say, is", "follow-the-leader: a high-reputation user votes to close and others follow suit. While in", "clear guideline. If to my second point, I am eager to understand how", "hear from the community's experiences as to whether it may be ill-advised to", "vague, for \"work-life-balance\" questions on Academia, they actually seem relevant, if not appropriate.", "seems that the idea of \"relying on the community\" devolves into follow-the-leader: a", "close votes followed after a high-profile user warned that the question veered into", "user votes to close and others follow suit. While in theory that should", "In my question I linked to these. **The point of this meta post", "up/down votes. Even though the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions) explicitly names questions about \"life as", "the help center's policies stay open and are answered, while other times questions", "my PhD and I think having a canine companion could help me break", "puppy, let's say, is too detrimental to research or if it can in", "abide by the defined guidelines of the site. I would argue that often", "a clear guideline. If to my second point, I am eager to understand", "to these. **The point of this meta post is twofold:** 1. For one,", "this, whether by appealing to change the stated site rules or by adjusting", "could help me break out of that funk, but first I would like", "quickly. It often seems that the idea of \"relying on the community\" devolves", "would like to hear from the community's experiences as to whether it may", "though the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions) explicitly names questions about \"life as a PhD student\"", "It often seems that the idea of \"relying on the community\" devolves into", "would like to start a conversation about the whimsicality of close votes. On", "with wasting time due to a sort of \"isolation daze\" during my PhD", "follow-the-leader effect. While I understand the boat programming concern, and on stack overflow", "point, please articulate why my post was off-topic and justify it with a", "assumes that these users abide by the defined guidelines of the site. I", "let's say, is too detrimental to research or if it can in fact", "importantly, it also assumes that these users abide by the defined guidelines of", "entry ends up being inappropriately raised and shifted away from what is stated", "student lifestyle. In my question I linked to these. **The point of this", "with a clear guideline. If to my second point, I am eager to", "this process assumes that these leaders see every post. But more importantly, it", "as evidenced by the commentary and oddly balanced number of up/down votes. Even", "site, and the \"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\" tag exists to cluster these types of questions, many", "often seems that the idea of \"relying on the community\" devolves into follow-the-leader:", "and vague, for \"work-life-balance\" questions on Academia, they actually seem relevant, if not", "can fix this, whether by appealing to change the stated site rules or", "assumes that these leaders see every post. But more importantly, it also assumes", "but first I would like to hear from the community's experiences as to", "number of up/down votes. Even though the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions) explicitly names questions about", "site. I would argue that often long-time users have developed their own opinions", "inappropriately raised and shifted away from what is stated by the terms of", "to understand how we can fix this, whether by appealing to change the", "exists to cluster these types of questions, many close votes followed after a", "Is there any disagreement to these points? If to my first point, please", "This topic provoked some pretty vehement arguments as to whether or not it", "or not it was considered on-topic or well-posed, as evidenced by the commentary", "inherent arbitrariness to that method. For one, this process assumes that these leaders", "valid are closed quickly. It often seems that the idea of \"relying on", "can in fact increase productivity by providing companionship during a trying process. This", "balanced number of up/down votes. Even though the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions) explicitly names questions", "I think it's one that is often biased by viewing a lot of", "the commentary and oddly balanced number of up/down votes. Even though the [help", "there any disagreement to these points? If to my first point, please articulate", "questions that seem that they should be valid are closed quickly. It often", "out of that funk, but first I would like to hear from the", "occasions duplicates, hyper-specific questions, and other violations of the help center's policies stay", "am eager to understand how we can fix this, whether by appealing to", "really seems like a follow-the-leader effect. While I understand the boat programming concern,", "justify it with a clear guideline. If to my second point, I am", "the Academia site, and the \"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\" tag exists to cluster these types of", "after a high-profile user warned that the question veered into \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\" territory.", "many close votes followed after a high-profile user warned that the question veered", "if it can in fact increase productivity by providing companionship during a trying", "1. For one, I would like to have my original pet post reopened.", "that these users abide by the defined guidelines of the site. I would", "[marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1) and [kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1) during a PhD; that is, other questions pertaining to the", "stay open and are answered, while other times questions that seem that they", "close votes in what really seems like a follow-the-leader effect. While I understand", "strong precedent for these kinds of questions in Academia, primarily the ones inquiring", "there is a strong precedent for these kinds of questions in Academia, primarily", "Secondly, I would like to start a conversation about the whimsicality of close", "while other times questions that seem that they should be valid are closed", "precedent for these kinds of questions in Academia, primarily the ones inquiring about", "of questions, many close votes followed after a high-profile user warned that the", "commentary and oddly balanced number of up/down votes. Even though the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions)", "in what really seems like a follow-the-leader effect. While I understand the boat", "of the help center's policies stay open and are answered, while other times", "question veered into \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\" territory. The consequence of that post was a", "questions, many close votes followed after a high-profile user warned that the question", "boat programming concern, and on stack overflow boat-programming-type questions are obviously too broad", "every post. But more importantly, it also assumes that these users abide by", "being inappropriately raised and shifted away from what is stated by the terms", "point, I am eager to understand how we can fix this, whether by", "If to my first point, please articulate why my post was off-topic and", "it's one that is often biased by viewing a lot of crappy posts.", "close votes. On many occasions duplicates, hyper-specific questions, and other violations of the", "questions pertaining to the graduate student lifestyle. In my question I linked to", "and justify it with a clear guideline. If to my second point, I", "please articulate why my post was off-topic and justify it with a clear", "high-reputation user votes to close and others follow suit. While in theory that", "2. Secondly, I would like to start a conversation about the whimsicality of", "as within the scope of the Academia site, and the \"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\" tag exists", "**Premise** I recently posed [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65062/getting-a-pet-during-a-phd) asking whether or not it is advised", "\"life as a PhD student\" as within the scope of the Academia site,", "this meta post is twofold:** 1. For one, I would like to have", "votes followed after a high-profile user warned that the question veered into \"[boat", "articulate why my post was off-topic and justify it with a clear guideline.", "to be honest, I think it's one that is often biased by viewing", "and are answered, while other times questions that seem that they should be", "off-topic and justify it with a clear guideline. If to my second point,", "Academia, they actually seem relevant, if not appropriate. Furthermore, there is a strong", "question I linked to these. **The point of this meta post is twofold:**", "guidelines of the site. I would argue that often long-time users have developed", "by viewing a lot of crappy posts. As a result, the bar for", "start a conversation about the whimsicality of close votes. On many occasions duplicates,", "that method. For one, this process assumes that these leaders see every post.", "the community\" devolves into follow-the-leader: a high-reputation user votes to close and others", "that should be fine, I believe there is an inherent arbitrariness to that", "if not appropriate. Furthermore, there is a strong precedent for these kinds of", "about [marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1) and [kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1) during a PhD; that is, other questions pertaining to", "first I would like to hear from the community's experiences as to whether", "the terms of the site. **Question** Is there any disagreement to these points?", "argue that often long-time users have developed their own opinions as to a", "trying process. This topic provoked some pretty vehement arguments as to whether or", "to a sort of \"isolation daze\" during my PhD and I think having", "suit. While in theory that should be fine, I believe there is an", "community\" devolves into follow-the-leader: a high-reputation user votes to close and others follow", "and, to be honest, I think it's one that is often biased by", "overflow boat-programming-type questions are obviously too broad and vague, for \"work-life-balance\" questions on", "is, other questions pertaining to the graduate student lifestyle. In my question I", "concern, and on stack overflow boat-programming-type questions are obviously too broad and vague,", "would like to have my original pet post reopened. I have struggled with", "to hear from the community's experiences as to whether it may be ill-advised", "twofold:** 1. For one, I would like to have my original pet post", "times questions that seem that they should be valid are closed quickly. It", "too detrimental to research or if it can in fact increase productivity by", "of this meta post is twofold:** 1. For one, I would like to", "questions about \"life as a PhD student\" as within the scope of the", "points? If to my first point, please articulate why my post was off-topic", "violations of the help center's policies stay open and are answered, while other", "they should be valid are closed quickly. It often seems that the idea", "of the site. I would argue that often long-time users have developed their", "up being inappropriately raised and shifted away from what is stated by the", "into \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\" territory. The consequence of that post was a lot close", "posts. As a result, the bar for entry ends up being inappropriately raised", "post was a lot close votes in what really seems like a follow-the-leader", "whether or not it was considered on-topic or well-posed, as evidenced by the", "process assumes that these leaders see every post. But more importantly, it also", "these kinds of questions in Academia, primarily the ones inquiring about [marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1) and", "and on stack overflow boat-programming-type questions are obviously too broad and vague, for", "idea of \"relying on the community\" devolves into follow-the-leader: a high-reputation user votes", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65062/getting-a-pet-during-a-phd) asking whether or not it is advised to get a pet", "too broad and vague, for \"work-life-balance\" questions on Academia, they actually seem relevant,", "explicitly names questions about \"life as a PhD student\" as within the scope", "types of questions, many close votes followed after a high-profile user warned that", "fix this, whether by appealing to change the stated site rules or by", "As a result, the bar for entry ends up being inappropriately raised and", "guideline. If to my second point, I am eager to understand how we", "territory. The consequence of that post was a lot close votes in what", "inquiring about [marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1) and [kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1) during a PhD; that is, other questions pertaining", "of \"isolation daze\" during my PhD and I think having a canine companion", "that seem that they should be valid are closed quickly. It often seems", "kinds of questions in Academia, primarily the ones inquiring about [marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1) and [kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1)", "open and are answered, while other times questions that seem that they should", "questions are obviously too broad and vague, for \"work-life-balance\" questions on Academia, they", "many occasions duplicates, hyper-specific questions, and other violations of the help center's policies", "on the community\" devolves into follow-the-leader: a high-reputation user votes to close and", "be ill-advised to do so. 2. Secondly, I would like to start a", "not it is advised to get a pet during the PhD process. The", "to do so. 2. Secondly, I would like to start a conversation about", "advised to get a pet during the PhD process. The major premise was", "is too detrimental to research or if it can in fact increase productivity", "are closed quickly. It often seems that the idea of \"relying on the", "why my post was off-topic and justify it with a clear guideline. If", "during the PhD process. The major premise was if the time/energy-cost of raising", "like a follow-the-leader effect. While I understand the boat programming concern, and on", "from the community's experiences as to whether it may be ill-advised to do", "during a PhD; that is, other questions pertaining to the graduate student lifestyle.", "evidenced by the commentary and oddly balanced number of up/down votes. Even though", "time/energy-cost of raising a puppy, let's say, is too detrimental to research or", "devolves into follow-the-leader: a high-reputation user votes to close and others follow suit.", "it with a clear guideline. If to my second point, I am eager", "the site. **Question** Is there any disagreement to these points? If to my", "detrimental to research or if it can in fact increase productivity by providing", "for \"work-life-balance\" questions on Academia, they actually seem relevant, if not appropriate. Furthermore,", "my original pet post reopened. I have struggled with wasting time due to", "I have struggled with wasting time due to a sort of \"isolation daze\"", "a lot of crappy posts. As a result, the bar for entry ends", "raised and shifted away from what is stated by the terms of the", "votes in what really seems like a follow-the-leader effect. While I understand the", "the site. I would argue that often long-time users have developed their own", "terms of the site. **Question** Is there any disagreement to these points? If", "asking whether or not it is advised to get a pet during the", "[help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions) explicitly names questions about \"life as a PhD student\" as within", "consequence of that post was a lot close votes in what really seems", "developed their own opinions as to a questions validity, and, to be honest,", "broad and vague, for \"work-life-balance\" questions on Academia, they actually seem relevant, if", "others follow suit. While in theory that should be fine, I believe there", "a lot close votes in what really seems like a follow-the-leader effect. While", "scope of the Academia site, and the \"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\" tag exists to cluster these", "I would like to hear from the community's experiences as to whether it", "have struggled with wasting time due to a sort of \"isolation daze\" during", "Academia, primarily the ones inquiring about [marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1) and [kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1) during a PhD; that", "having a canine companion could help me break out of that funk, but", "understand how we can fix this, whether by appealing to change the stated", "seem relevant, if not appropriate. Furthermore, there is a strong precedent for these", "the bar for entry ends up being inappropriately raised and shifted away from", "or not it is advised to get a pet during the PhD process.", "think it's one that is often biased by viewing a lot of crappy", "[kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1) during a PhD; that is, other questions pertaining to the graduate student", "If to my second point, I am eager to understand how we can", "during a trying process. This topic provoked some pretty vehement arguments as to", "Furthermore, there is a strong precedent for these kinds of questions in Academia,", "break out of that funk, but first I would like to hear from", "The consequence of that post was a lot close votes in what really", "policies stay open and are answered, while other times questions that seem that", "second point, I am eager to understand how we can fix this, whether", "veered into \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\" territory. The consequence of that post was a lot", "linked to these. **The point of this meta post is twofold:** 1. For", "it can in fact increase productivity by providing companionship during a trying process.", "posed [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65062/getting-a-pet-during-a-phd) asking whether or not it is advised to get a", "questions in Academia, primarily the ones inquiring about [marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1) and [kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1) during a", "follow suit. While in theory that should be fine, I believe there is", "is a strong precedent for these kinds of questions in Academia, primarily the", "daze\" during my PhD and I think having a canine companion could help", "boat-programming-type questions are obviously too broad and vague, for \"work-life-balance\" questions on Academia,", "to that method. For one, this process assumes that these leaders see every", "as to a questions validity, and, to be honest, I think it's one", "one, this process assumes that these leaders see every post. But more importantly,", "\"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\" tag exists to cluster these types of questions, many close votes followed", "pretty vehement arguments as to whether or not it was considered on-topic or", "into follow-the-leader: a high-reputation user votes to close and others follow suit. While", "long-time users have developed their own opinions as to a questions validity, and,", "it is advised to get a pet during the PhD process. The major", "biased by viewing a lot of crappy posts. As a result, the bar", "on Academia, they actually seem relevant, if not appropriate. Furthermore, there is a", "the whimsicality of close votes. On many occasions duplicates, hyper-specific questions, and other", "also assumes that these users abide by the defined guidelines of the site.", "about the whimsicality of close votes. On many occasions duplicates, hyper-specific questions, and", "duplicates, hyper-specific questions, and other violations of the help center's policies stay open", "about \"life as a PhD student\" as within the scope of the Academia", "in theory that should be fine, I believe there is an inherent arbitrariness", "providing companionship during a trying process. This topic provoked some pretty vehement arguments", "hyper-specific questions, and other violations of the help center's policies stay open and", "to get a pet during the PhD process. The major premise was if", "ends up being inappropriately raised and shifted away from what is stated by", "questions, and other violations of the help center's policies stay open and are", "it may be ill-advised to do so. 2. Secondly, I would like to", "questions validity, and, to be honest, I think it's one that is often", "more importantly, it also assumes that these users abide by the defined guidelines", "theory that should be fine, I believe there is an inherent arbitrariness to", "and shifted away from what is stated by the terms of the site.", "method. For one, this process assumes that these leaders see every post. But", "pet during the PhD process. The major premise was if the time/energy-cost of", "of that post was a lot close votes in what really seems like", "a questions validity, and, to be honest, I think it's one that is", "may be ill-advised to do so. 2. Secondly, I would like to start", "a high-reputation user votes to close and others follow suit. While in theory", "is an inherent arbitrariness to that method. For one, this process assumes that", "research or if it can in fact increase productivity by providing companionship during", "to have my original pet post reopened. I have struggled with wasting time", "by appealing to change the stated site rules or by adjusting the voting", "post is twofold:** 1. For one, I would like to have my original", "arbitrariness to that method. For one, this process assumes that these leaders see", "some pretty vehement arguments as to whether or not it was considered on-topic", "in Academia, primarily the ones inquiring about [marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1) and [kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1) during a PhD;", "was if the time/energy-cost of raising a puppy, let's say, is too detrimental", "the community's experiences as to whether it may be ill-advised to do so.", "arguments as to whether or not it was considered on-topic or well-posed, as", "understand the boat programming concern, and on stack overflow boat-programming-type questions are obviously", "conversation about the whimsicality of close votes. On many occasions duplicates, hyper-specific questions,", "for these kinds of questions in Academia, primarily the ones inquiring about [marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1)", "I understand the boat programming concern, and on stack overflow boat-programming-type questions are", "was considered on-topic or well-posed, as evidenced by the commentary and oddly balanced", "the scope of the Academia site, and the \"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\" tag exists to cluster", "me break out of that funk, but first I would like to hear", "is advised to get a pet during the PhD process. The major premise", "lot close votes in what really seems like a follow-the-leader effect. While I", "time due to a sort of \"isolation daze\" during my PhD and I", "from what is stated by the terms of the site. **Question** Is there", "by providing companionship during a trying process. This topic provoked some pretty vehement", "would argue that often long-time users have developed their own opinions as to", "own opinions as to a questions validity, and, to be honest, I think", "to my first point, please articulate why my post was off-topic and justify", "The major premise was if the time/energy-cost of raising a puppy, let's say,", "actually seem relevant, if not appropriate. Furthermore, there is a strong precedent for", "due to a sort of \"isolation daze\" during my PhD and I think", "But more importantly, it also assumes that these users abide by the defined", "obviously too broad and vague, for \"work-life-balance\" questions on Academia, they actually seem", "users have developed their own opinions as to a questions validity, and, to", "is often biased by viewing a lot of crappy posts. As a result,", "my question I linked to these. **The point of this meta post is", "away from what is stated by the terms of the site. **Question** Is", "of the Academia site, and the \"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\" tag exists to cluster these types", "these types of questions, many close votes followed after a high-profile user warned", "votes to close and others follow suit. While in theory that should be", "well-posed, as evidenced by the commentary and oddly balanced number of up/down votes.", "that is, other questions pertaining to the graduate student lifestyle. In my question", "post reopened. I have struggled with wasting time due to a sort of", "viewing a lot of crappy posts. As a result, the bar for entry", "is stated by the terms of the site. **Question** Is there any disagreement", "bar for entry ends up being inappropriately raised and shifted away from what", "within the scope of the Academia site, and the \"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\" tag exists to", "the time/energy-cost of raising a puppy, let's say, is too detrimental to research", "to whether it may be ill-advised to do so. 2. Secondly, I would", "process. This topic provoked some pretty vehement arguments as to whether or not", "there is an inherent arbitrariness to that method. For one, this process assumes", "a PhD; that is, other questions pertaining to the graduate student lifestyle. In", "primarily the ones inquiring about [marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1) and [kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1) during a PhD; that is,", "say, is too detrimental to research or if it can in fact increase", "a PhD student\" as within the scope of the Academia site, and the", "appropriate. Furthermore, there is a strong precedent for these kinds of questions in", "that funk, but first I would like to hear from the community's experiences", "that the idea of \"relying on the community\" devolves into follow-the-leader: a high-reputation", "these points? If to my first point, please articulate why my post was", "to close and others follow suit. While in theory that should be fine,", "a strong precedent for these kinds of questions in Academia, primarily the ones", "whimsicality of close votes. On many occasions duplicates, hyper-specific questions, and other violations", "companionship during a trying process. This topic provoked some pretty vehement arguments as", "for entry ends up being inappropriately raised and shifted away from what is", "raising a puppy, let's say, is too detrimental to research or if it", "as to whether or not it was considered on-topic or well-posed, as evidenced", "ones inquiring about [marriage](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9192/points-to-consider-when-deciding-whether-to-get-married-during-a-phd?lq=1) and [kids](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11421/advice-for-having-children-during-graduate-school?lq=1) during a PhD; that is, other questions", "considered on-topic or well-posed, as evidenced by the commentary and oddly balanced number", "ill-advised to do so. 2. Secondly, I would like to start a conversation", "I would like to have my original pet post reopened. I have struggled", "graduate student lifestyle. In my question I linked to these. **The point of", "a conversation about the whimsicality of close votes. On many occasions duplicates, hyper-specific", "whether or not it is advised to get a pet during the PhD", "on stack overflow boat-programming-type questions are obviously too broad and vague, for \"work-life-balance\"", "whether it may be ill-advised to do so. 2. Secondly, I would like", "programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\" territory. The consequence of that post was a lot close votes in", "programming concern, and on stack overflow boat-programming-type questions are obviously too broad and", "of crappy posts. As a result, the bar for entry ends up being", "a sort of \"isolation daze\" during my PhD and I think having a", "that these leaders see every post. But more importantly, it also assumes that", "oddly balanced number of up/down votes. Even though the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions) explicitly names", "was off-topic and justify it with a clear guideline. If to my second", "and others follow suit. While in theory that should be fine, I believe", "**The point of this meta post is twofold:** 1. For one, I would", "While I understand the boat programming concern, and on stack overflow boat-programming-type questions", "if the time/energy-cost of raising a puppy, let's say, is too detrimental to", "of \"relying on the community\" devolves into follow-the-leader: a high-reputation user votes to", "seem that they should be valid are closed quickly. It often seems that", "leaders see every post. But more importantly, it also assumes that these users", "wasting time due to a sort of \"isolation daze\" during my PhD and", "help me break out of that funk, but first I would like to", "warned that the question veered into \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\" territory. The consequence of that", "community's experiences as to whether it may be ill-advised to do so. 2.", "my first point, please articulate why my post was off-topic and justify it", "Even though the [help center](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions) explicitly names questions about \"life as a PhD", "so. 2. Secondly, I would like to start a conversation about the whimsicality", "For one, I would like to have my original pet post reopened. I", "companion could help me break out of that funk, but first I would", "a trying process. This topic provoked some pretty vehement arguments as to whether", "of the site. **Question** Is there any disagreement to these points? If to", "lifestyle. In my question I linked to these. **The point of this meta", "seems like a follow-the-leader effect. While I understand the boat programming concern, and", "to whether or not it was considered on-topic or well-posed, as evidenced by", "the question veered into \"[boat programming](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)\" territory. The consequence of that post was", "fact increase productivity by providing companionship during a trying process. This topic provoked", "a pet during the PhD process. The major premise was if the time/energy-cost", "For one, this process assumes that these leaders see every post. But more", "defined guidelines of the site. I would argue that often long-time users have", "I would like to start a conversation about the whimsicality of close votes.", "the \"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\" tag exists to cluster these types of questions, many close votes", "I linked to these. **The point of this meta post is twofold:** 1.", "my post was off-topic and justify it with a clear guideline. If to", "appealing to change the stated site rules or by adjusting the voting system.", "student\" as within the scope of the Academia site, and the \"[work-life-balance](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/work-life-balance)\" tag" ]
[ "etc.). Even though from time to time there actually exists a good answer,", "seem to be a trend that hard-to-answer questions get downvoted, and even closed", "serial serial voting, but I'd encourage genuine voters to think twice about whether", "voting, but I'd encourage genuine voters to think twice about whether they are", "a trend that hard-to-answer questions get downvoted, and even closed for some random", "questions get downvoted, and even closed for some random reason (too broad, opinion-based,", "a couple of questions on this website. Based on this small dataset, there", "closed or roomba-removed. Voters are free to do whatever, except serial serial voting,", "question is closed or roomba-removed. Voters are free to do whatever, except serial", "twice about whether they are downvoting/closing a question because it seems difficult or", "time there actually exists a good answer, which is hard to share when", "hard-to-answer questions get downvoted, and even closed for some random reason (too broad,", "there seem to be a trend that hard-to-answer questions get downvoted, and even", "even closed for some random reason (too broad, opinion-based, etc.). Even though from", "from time to time there actually exists a good answer, which is hard", "the question is closed or roomba-removed. Voters are free to do whatever, except", "questions on this website. Based on this small dataset, there seem to be", "couple of questions on this website. Based on this small dataset, there seem", "for some random reason (too broad, opinion-based, etc.). Even though from time to", "voters to think twice about whether they are downvoting/closing a question because it", "when the question is closed or roomba-removed. Voters are free to do whatever,", "Even though from time to time there actually exists a good answer, which", "but I'd encourage genuine voters to think twice about whether they are downvoting/closing", "Based on this small dataset, there seem to be a trend that hard-to-answer", "though from time to time there actually exists a good answer, which is", "some random reason (too broad, opinion-based, etc.). Even though from time to time", "(too broad, opinion-based, etc.). Even though from time to time there actually exists", "to share when the question is closed or roomba-removed. Voters are free to", "website. Based on this small dataset, there seem to be a trend that", "think twice about whether they are downvoting/closing a question because it seems difficult", "answer, which is hard to share when the question is closed or roomba-removed.", "except serial serial voting, but I'd encourage genuine voters to think twice about", "hard to share when the question is closed or roomba-removed. Voters are free", "that hard-to-answer questions get downvoted, and even closed for some random reason (too", "about whether they are downvoting/closing a question because it seems difficult or impossible", "actually exists a good answer, which is hard to share when the question", "trend that hard-to-answer questions get downvoted, and even closed for some random reason", "to time there actually exists a good answer, which is hard to share", "and even closed for some random reason (too broad, opinion-based, etc.). Even though", "I'd encourage genuine voters to think twice about whether they are downvoting/closing a", "of questions on this website. Based on this small dataset, there seem to", "have posted a couple of questions on this website. Based on this small", "this website. Based on this small dataset, there seem to be a trend", "opinion-based, etc.). Even though from time to time there actually exists a good", "whether they are downvoting/closing a question because it seems difficult or impossible to", "a good answer, which is hard to share when the question is closed", "closed for some random reason (too broad, opinion-based, etc.). Even though from time", "I have posted a couple of questions on this website. Based on this", "be a trend that hard-to-answer questions get downvoted, and even closed for some", "is closed or roomba-removed. Voters are free to do whatever, except serial serial", "free to do whatever, except serial serial voting, but I'd encourage genuine voters", "encourage genuine voters to think twice about whether they are downvoting/closing a question", "downvoted, and even closed for some random reason (too broad, opinion-based, etc.). Even", "time to time there actually exists a good answer, which is hard to", "do whatever, except serial serial voting, but I'd encourage genuine voters to think", "exists a good answer, which is hard to share when the question is", "are free to do whatever, except serial serial voting, but I'd encourage genuine", "random reason (too broad, opinion-based, etc.). Even though from time to time there", "genuine voters to think twice about whether they are downvoting/closing a question because", "on this small dataset, there seem to be a trend that hard-to-answer questions", "they are downvoting/closing a question because it seems difficult or impossible to answer.", "is hard to share when the question is closed or roomba-removed. Voters are", "Voters are free to do whatever, except serial serial voting, but I'd encourage", "good answer, which is hard to share when the question is closed or", "share when the question is closed or roomba-removed. Voters are free to do", "on this website. Based on this small dataset, there seem to be a", "broad, opinion-based, etc.). Even though from time to time there actually exists a", "posted a couple of questions on this website. Based on this small dataset,", "small dataset, there seem to be a trend that hard-to-answer questions get downvoted,", "dataset, there seem to be a trend that hard-to-answer questions get downvoted, and", "this small dataset, there seem to be a trend that hard-to-answer questions get", "which is hard to share when the question is closed or roomba-removed. Voters", "roomba-removed. Voters are free to do whatever, except serial serial voting, but I'd", "to do whatever, except serial serial voting, but I'd encourage genuine voters to", "get downvoted, and even closed for some random reason (too broad, opinion-based, etc.).", "reason (too broad, opinion-based, etc.). Even though from time to time there actually", "there actually exists a good answer, which is hard to share when the", "or roomba-removed. Voters are free to do whatever, except serial serial voting, but", "to be a trend that hard-to-answer questions get downvoted, and even closed for", "serial voting, but I'd encourage genuine voters to think twice about whether they", "whatever, except serial serial voting, but I'd encourage genuine voters to think twice", "to think twice about whether they are downvoting/closing a question because it seems" ]
[ "pervious question: [Are realistic hypothetical situation based questions permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted) it seems clear that", "applicability is obvious, but in other it is not clear. Should [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show", "community thinks that to an extent hypothetical questions are okay. A number of", "is potentially related to [Should seemingly hard-to-answer questions be downvoted (and closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed) Our", "(and closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed) Our help center [don't ask section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) includes some generic text that", "are okay. A number of the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions do", "section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) includes some generic text that is used SE wide: > > You", "ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face. > >", "> > In a pervious question: [Are realistic hypothetical situation based questions permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted)", "should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face.", "Our help center [don't ask section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) includes some generic text that is used", "help center [don't ask section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) includes some generic text that is used SE", "provide the practical problem that the requested information is needed to solve. In", "closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed) Our help center [don't ask section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) includes some generic text that is", "[Are realistic hypothetical situation based questions permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted) it seems clear that the community", "extent hypothetical questions are okay. A number of the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'reference-request'\") questions that are merely asking for a reference, and not asking", "questions permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted) it seems clear that the community thinks that to an extent", "an extent hypothetical questions are okay. A number of the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions", "you face. > > > In a pervious question: [Are realistic hypothetical situation", "that are merely asking for a reference, and not asking a bigger question,", "In some cases the applicability is obvious, but in other it is not", "permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted) it seems clear that the community thinks that to an extent hypothetical", "is obvious, but in other it is not clear. Should [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions", "of the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions do not provide the practical", "is used SE wide: > > You should only ask practical, answerable questions", "related to [Should seemingly hard-to-answer questions be downvoted (and closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed) Our help center", "questions do not provide the practical problem that the requested information is needed", "solve. In some cases the applicability is obvious, but in other it is", "do not provide the practical problem that the requested information is needed to", "actual problems that you face. > > > In a pervious question: [Are", "\"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions that are merely asking for a reference, and", "includes some generic text that is used SE wide: > > You should", "only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face. >", "> In a pervious question: [Are realistic hypothetical situation based questions permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted) it", "[reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions that are merely asking for a reference,", "[Should seemingly hard-to-answer questions be downvoted (and closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed) Our help center [don't ask", "clear. Should [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions that are merely asking for", "asking for a reference, and not asking a bigger question, be off topic?", "that you face. > > > In a pervious question: [Are realistic hypothetical", "some generic text that is used SE wide: > > You should only", "requested information is needed to solve. In some cases the applicability is obvious,", "question: [Are realistic hypothetical situation based questions permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted) it seems clear that the", "questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions that are merely asking for a reference, and not", "in other it is not clear. Should [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions", "questions that are merely asking for a reference, and not asking a bigger", "situation based questions permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted) it seems clear that the community thinks that to", "downvoted (and closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed) Our help center [don't ask section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) includes some generic text", "thinks that to an extent hypothetical questions are okay. A number of the", "text that is used SE wide: > > You should only ask practical,", "to solve. In some cases the applicability is obvious, but in other it", "question is potentially related to [Should seemingly hard-to-answer questions be downvoted (and closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed)", "[reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions do not provide the practical problem that", "\"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions do not provide the practical problem that the", "'reference-request'\") questions do not provide the practical problem that the requested information is", "be downvoted (and closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed) Our help center [don't ask section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) includes some generic", "potentially related to [Should seemingly hard-to-answer questions be downvoted (and closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed) Our help", "Should [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions that are merely asking for a", "face. > > > In a pervious question: [Are realistic hypothetical situation based", "obvious, but in other it is not clear. Should [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged", "but in other it is not clear. Should [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\")", "the requested information is needed to solve. In some cases the applicability is", "hard-to-answer questions be downvoted (and closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed) Our help center [don't ask section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) includes", "seemingly hard-to-answer questions be downvoted (and closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed) Our help center [don't ask section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask)", "In a pervious question: [Are realistic hypothetical situation based questions permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted) it seems", "it seems clear that the community thinks that to an extent hypothetical questions", "> > > In a pervious question: [Are realistic hypothetical situation based questions", "used SE wide: > > You should only ask practical, answerable questions based", "problem that the requested information is needed to solve. In some cases the", "answerable questions based on actual problems that you face. > > > In", "hypothetical questions are okay. A number of the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\")", "that is used SE wide: > > You should only ask practical, answerable", "tagged 'reference-request'\") questions do not provide the practical problem that the requested information", "wide: > > You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual", "merely asking for a reference, and not asking a bigger question, be off", "a pervious question: [Are realistic hypothetical situation based questions permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted) it seems clear", "based on actual problems that you face. > > > In a pervious", "on actual problems that you face. > > > In a pervious question:", "is not clear. Should [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions that are merely", "not clear. Should [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions that are merely asking", "practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face. > > >", "ask section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) includes some generic text that is used SE wide: > >", "okay. A number of the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions do not", "questions be downvoted (and closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed) Our help center [don't ask section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) includes some", "the community thinks that to an extent hypothetical questions are okay. A number", "other it is not clear. Should [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions that", "This question is potentially related to [Should seemingly hard-to-answer questions be downvoted (and", "clear that the community thinks that to an extent hypothetical questions are okay.", "number of the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions do not provide the", "to an extent hypothetical questions are okay. A number of the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show", "that to an extent hypothetical questions are okay. A number of the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request", "not provide the practical problem that the requested information is needed to solve.", "the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions do not provide the practical problem", "some cases the applicability is obvious, but in other it is not clear.", "A number of the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions do not provide", "[don't ask section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) includes some generic text that is used SE wide: >", "questions based on actual problems that you face. > > > In a", "seems clear that the community thinks that to an extent hypothetical questions are", "practical problem that the requested information is needed to solve. In some cases", "to [Should seemingly hard-to-answer questions be downvoted (and closed)?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3249/should-seemingly-hard-to-answer-questions-be-downvoted-and-closed) Our help center [don't", "that the requested information is needed to solve. In some cases the applicability", "> > You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems", "the practical problem that the requested information is needed to solve. In some", "information is needed to solve. In some cases the applicability is obvious, but", "realistic hypothetical situation based questions permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted) it seems clear that the community thinks", "problems that you face. > > > In a pervious question: [Are realistic", "are merely asking for a reference, and not asking a bigger question, be", "generic text that is used SE wide: > > You should only ask", "center [don't ask section](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) includes some generic text that is used SE wide:", "it is not clear. Should [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions that are", "questions are okay. A number of the [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request \"show questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions", "the applicability is obvious, but in other it is not clear. Should [reference-request](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-request", "cases the applicability is obvious, but in other it is not clear. Should", "You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you", "is needed to solve. In some cases the applicability is obvious, but in", "that the community thinks that to an extent hypothetical questions are okay. A", "questions tagged 'reference-request'\") questions do not provide the practical problem that the requested", "'reference-request'\") questions that are merely asking for a reference, and not asking a", "SE wide: > > You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on", "based questions permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted) it seems clear that the community thinks that to an", "hypothetical situation based questions permitted?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/629/are-realistic-hypothetical-situation-based-questions-permitted) it seems clear that the community thinks that", "> You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that", "needed to solve. In some cases the applicability is obvious, but in other" ]
[ "lists of axioms in a mathematical manuscript? * tex.stackexchange.com? (i think no, because", "no, because it is not specific to TeX) * academia.stackexchange.com? * writers.stackexchange.com? *", "can I ask a question about arrangement of numbered lists of axioms in", "in a mathematical manuscript? * tex.stackexchange.com? (i think no, because it is not", "ask a question about arrangement of numbered lists of axioms in a mathematical", "about arrangement of numbered lists of axioms in a mathematical manuscript? * tex.stackexchange.com?", "I ask a question about arrangement of numbered lists of axioms in a", "manuscript? * tex.stackexchange.com? (i think no, because it is not specific to TeX)", "mathematical manuscript? * tex.stackexchange.com? (i think no, because it is not specific to", "tex.stackexchange.com? (i think no, because it is not specific to TeX) * academia.stackexchange.com?", "of axioms in a mathematical manuscript? * tex.stackexchange.com? (i think no, because it", "arrangement of numbered lists of axioms in a mathematical manuscript? * tex.stackexchange.com? (i", "numbered lists of axioms in a mathematical manuscript? * tex.stackexchange.com? (i think no,", "because it is not specific to TeX) * academia.stackexchange.com? * writers.stackexchange.com? * other?", "* tex.stackexchange.com? (i think no, because it is not specific to TeX) *", "a mathematical manuscript? * tex.stackexchange.com? (i think no, because it is not specific", "(i think no, because it is not specific to TeX) * academia.stackexchange.com? *", "think no, because it is not specific to TeX) * academia.stackexchange.com? * writers.stackexchange.com?", "of numbered lists of axioms in a mathematical manuscript? * tex.stackexchange.com? (i think", "Where can I ask a question about arrangement of numbered lists of axioms", "question about arrangement of numbered lists of axioms in a mathematical manuscript? *", "a question about arrangement of numbered lists of axioms in a mathematical manuscript?", "axioms in a mathematical manuscript? * tex.stackexchange.com? (i think no, because it is" ]
[ "in grade due to strict attendance policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy) Do we want to allow these?", "We seem to get a lot of questions that seem to boil down", "lot of questions that seem to boil down to this: \"My professor is", "then what is the appropriate reason for closing? Would it be a good", "professor is bad. Right?\" Two recent examples: [Expecting students to use a code", "students to use a code base that is known to be buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy) [How", "with dramatic drop in grade due to strict attendance policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy) Do we want", "to allow these? If not, then what is the appropriate reason for closing?", "to deal with dramatic drop in grade due to strict attendance policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy) Do", "we want to allow these? If not, then what is the appropriate reason", "that seem to boil down to this: \"My professor is bad. Right?\" Two", "allow these? If not, then what is the appropriate reason for closing? Would", "to strict attendance policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy) Do we want to allow these? If not, then", "not, then what is the appropriate reason for closing? Would it be a", "down to this: \"My professor is bad. Right?\" Two recent examples: [Expecting students", "the appropriate reason for closing? Would it be a good idea to add", "strict attendance policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy) Do we want to allow these? If not, then what", "a lot of questions that seem to boil down to this: \"My professor", "attendance policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy) Do we want to allow these? If not, then what is", "If not, then what is the appropriate reason for closing? Would it be", "for closing? Would it be a good idea to add a new, specialized", "of questions that seem to boil down to this: \"My professor is bad.", "a code base that is known to be buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy) [How to deal with", "Right?\" Two recent examples: [Expecting students to use a code base that is", "be buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy) [How to deal with dramatic drop in grade due to strict", "grade due to strict attendance policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy) Do we want to allow these? If", "Two recent examples: [Expecting students to use a code base that is known", "these? If not, then what is the appropriate reason for closing? Would it", "boil down to this: \"My professor is bad. Right?\" Two recent examples: [Expecting", "is the appropriate reason for closing? Would it be a good idea to", "closing? Would it be a good idea to add a new, specialized reason", "idea to add a new, specialized reason for closing questions such as these?", "to use a code base that is known to be buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy) [How to", "get a lot of questions that seem to boil down to this: \"My", "examples: [Expecting students to use a code base that is known to be", "to be buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy) [How to deal with dramatic drop in grade due to", "to this: \"My professor is bad. Right?\" Two recent examples: [Expecting students to", "\"My professor is bad. Right?\" Two recent examples: [Expecting students to use a", "Would it be a good idea to add a new, specialized reason for", "base that is known to be buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy) [How to deal with dramatic drop", "it be a good idea to add a new, specialized reason for closing", "a good idea to add a new, specialized reason for closing questions such", "[Expecting students to use a code base that is known to be buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy)", "due to strict attendance policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy) Do we want to allow these? If not,", "drop in grade due to strict attendance policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy) Do we want to allow", "use a code base that is known to be buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy) [How to deal", "buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy) [How to deal with dramatic drop in grade due to strict attendance", "to boil down to this: \"My professor is bad. Right?\" Two recent examples:", "good idea to add a new, specialized reason for closing questions such as", "questions that seem to boil down to this: \"My professor is bad. Right?\"", "seem to boil down to this: \"My professor is bad. Right?\" Two recent", "recent examples: [Expecting students to use a code base that is known to", "[How to deal with dramatic drop in grade due to strict attendance policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy)", "Do we want to allow these? If not, then what is the appropriate", "this: \"My professor is bad. Right?\" Two recent examples: [Expecting students to use", "is bad. Right?\" Two recent examples: [Expecting students to use a code base", "known to be buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy) [How to deal with dramatic drop in grade due", "deal with dramatic drop in grade due to strict attendance policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy) Do we", "reason for closing? Would it be a good idea to add a new,", "policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy) Do we want to allow these? If not, then what is the", "code base that is known to be buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy) [How to deal with dramatic", "that is known to be buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy) [How to deal with dramatic drop in", "to get a lot of questions that seem to boil down to this:", "is known to be buggy?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65749/expecting-students-to-use-a-code-base-that-is-known-to-be-buggy) [How to deal with dramatic drop in grade", "appropriate reason for closing? Would it be a good idea to add a", "be a good idea to add a new, specialized reason for closing questions", "bad. Right?\" Two recent examples: [Expecting students to use a code base that", "want to allow these? If not, then what is the appropriate reason for", "seem to get a lot of questions that seem to boil down to", "dramatic drop in grade due to strict attendance policy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/65857/how-to-deal-with-dramatic-drop-in-grade-due-to-strict-attendance-policy) Do we want to", "what is the appropriate reason for closing? Would it be a good idea" ]
[ "the site, and if the OP would have put any effort into modifying", "their own, we would never have noticed. Is there any issue with leaving", "is very relevant to the site, and if the OP would have put", "to the site, and if the OP would have put any effort into", "was their own, we would never have noticed. Is there any issue with", "the question to appear as if it was their own, we would never", "itself is very relevant to the site, and if the OP would have", "here is that the question itself is very relevant to the site, and", "site, and if the OP would have put any effort into modifying the", "like a homework question to the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73). The twist here is that the", "but it appears that [someone has posted what looks a lot like a", "the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73). The twist here is that the question itself is very relevant", "site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73). The twist here is that the question itself is very relevant to", "as if it was their own, we would never have noticed. Is there", "that [someone has posted what looks a lot like a homework question to", "to the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73). The twist here is that the question itself is very", "lot like a homework question to the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73). The twist here is that", "scenario here, but it appears that [someone has posted what looks a lot", "question to the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73). The twist here is that the question itself is", "pretty uncommon scenario here, but it appears that [someone has posted what looks", "modifying the question to appear as if it was their own, we would", "looks a lot like a homework question to the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73). The twist here", "a homework question to the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73). The twist here is that the question", "[someone has posted what looks a lot like a homework question to the", "appear as if it was their own, we would never have noticed. Is", "own, we would never have noticed. Is there any issue with leaving this", "and if the OP would have put any effort into modifying the question", "is a pretty uncommon scenario here, but it appears that [someone has posted", "posted what looks a lot like a homework question to the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73). The", "effort into modifying the question to appear as if it was their own,", "The twist here is that the question itself is very relevant to the", "it was their own, we would never have noticed. Is there any issue", "if the OP would have put any effort into modifying the question to", "we would never have noticed. Is there any issue with leaving this question", "homework question to the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73). The twist here is that the question itself", "to appear as if it was their own, we would never have noticed.", "OP would have put any effort into modifying the question to appear as", "would have put any effort into modifying the question to appear as if", "the question itself is very relevant to the site, and if the OP", "what looks a lot like a homework question to the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73). The twist", "it appears that [someone has posted what looks a lot like a homework", "here, but it appears that [someone has posted what looks a lot like", "any effort into modifying the question to appear as if it was their", "a lot like a homework question to the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73). The twist here is", "put any effort into modifying the question to appear as if it was", "appears that [someone has posted what looks a lot like a homework question", "into modifying the question to appear as if it was their own, we", "uncommon scenario here, but it appears that [someone has posted what looks a", "would never have noticed. Is there any issue with leaving this question open?", "question itself is very relevant to the site, and if the OP would", "relevant to the site, and if the OP would have put any effort", "question to appear as if it was their own, we would never have", "is that the question itself is very relevant to the site, and if", "very relevant to the site, and if the OP would have put any", "the OP would have put any effort into modifying the question to appear", "a pretty uncommon scenario here, but it appears that [someone has posted what", "have put any effort into modifying the question to appear as if it", "if it was their own, we would never have noticed. Is there any", "twist here is that the question itself is very relevant to the site,", "This is a pretty uncommon scenario here, but it appears that [someone has", "that the question itself is very relevant to the site, and if the", "has posted what looks a lot like a homework question to the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/66007/73)." ]
[ "and unhappy, and want to know if they should quit. Typically, there are", "format. However, I think we could offer some useful general answers to a", "stressed about AND they're worried about money... Usually these questions are closed because", "question and provided an answer: [Should I quit my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66846/should-i-quit-my-phd/66847#66847) Additional answers are", "such as: They're away from home, and haven't made any friends yet AND", "am currently debating whether to leave my PhD program- any advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice) --- I've", "the mental health issue before making any big decisions, if possible; maybe see", "the type of questions I'm talking about. * [I want to quit PhD", "about each problem in isolation; consider a leave of absence; etc. Here are", "there are a number of complicating factors, such as: They're away from home,", "posts on here where someone is in a PhD programme, and they're very", "they suffer from depression or panic attacks or some other mental health problem", "to quit PhD after 4 months. Should I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i) * [Leave of Absence from", "on here where someone is in a PhD programme, and they're very stressed", "situation is giving me anxiety attacks. Is quitting (and losing 2 years) my", "(foreign) country of study a valid reason to drop out of a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea)", "before, so don't expect to feel comfortable in it for the first N", "about YOUR goals rather than just trying to please parents/advisors; realise that a", "want to quit PhD after 4 months. Should I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i) * [Leave of Absence", "is in a PhD programme, and they're very stressed and unhappy, and want", "these questions are closed because they aren't a good fit for our Q&A", "trying to please parents/advisors; realise that a PhD programme is very different than", "Usually these questions are closed because they aren't a good fit for our", "decisions, if possible; maybe see the student counselor; think about YOUR goals rather", "and want to know if they should quit. Typically, there are a number", "a lot of posts on here where someone is in a PhD programme,", "* [I am currently debating whether to leave my PhD program- any advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice)", "any big decisions, if possible; maybe see the student counselor; think about YOUR", "any advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice) --- I've created the question and provided an answer: [Should I", "lot of posts on here where someone is in a PhD programme, and", "canonical question. E.g., address the mental health issue before making any big decisions,", "parents/advisors; realise that a PhD programme is very different than anything you've likely", "PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea) * [I am currently debating whether to leave my PhD program- any", "4 months. Should I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i) * [Leave of Absence from PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd) * [Should I", "E.g., address the mental health issue before making any big decisions, if possible;", "social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) * [My PhD situation is giving me anxiety attacks. Is quitting", "of posts on here where someone is in a PhD programme, and they're", "the first N months; try to think about each problem in isolation; consider", "feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study a valid reason", "a valid reason to drop out of a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea) * [I am currently", "advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice) --- I've created the question and provided an answer: [Should I quit", "created the question and provided an answer: [Should I quit my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66846/should-i-quit-my-phd/66847#66847) Additional", "after 4 months. Should I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i) * [Leave of Absence from PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd) * [Should", "program- any advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice) --- I've created the question and provided an answer: [Should", "haven't made any friends yet AND they suffer from depression or panic attacks", "is giving me anxiety attacks. Is quitting (and losing 2 years) my only", "Typically, there are a number of complicating factors, such as: They're away from", "any friends yet AND they suffer from depression or panic attacks or some", "they aren't a good fit for our Q&A format. However, I think we", "family situation that they're stressed about AND they're worried about money... Usually these", "fit for our Q&A format. However, I think we could offer some useful", "made any friends yet AND they suffer from depression or panic attacks or", "please parents/advisors; realise that a PhD programme is very different than anything you've", "money... Usually these questions are closed because they aren't a good fit for", "quit. Typically, there are a number of complicating factors, such as: They're away", "about AND they're worried about money... Usually these questions are closed because they", "YOUR goals rather than just trying to please parents/advisors; realise that a PhD", "Should I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i) * [Leave of Absence from PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd) * [Should I quit my", "only option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of", "unhappy, and want to know if they should quit. Typically, there are a", "I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i) * [Leave of Absence from PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd) * [Should I quit my PhD", "PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd) * [Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life)", "to feel comfortable in it for the first N months; try to think", "they're stressed about AND they're worried about money... Usually these questions are closed", "quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) * [My PhD situation", "some other mental health problem AND there's a sick relative or some other", "the question and provided an answer: [Should I quit my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66846/should-i-quit-my-phd/66847#66847) Additional answers", "just trying to please parents/advisors; realise that a PhD programme is very different", "number of complicating factors, such as: They're away from home, and haven't made", "of the type of questions I'm talking about. * [I want to quit", "currently debating whether to leave my PhD program- any advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice) --- I've created", "if they should quit. Typically, there are a number of complicating factors, such", "away from home, and haven't made any friends yet AND they suffer from", "there's a sick relative or some other family situation that they're stressed about", "PhD programme is very different than anything you've likely done before, so don't", "and haven't made any friends yet AND they suffer from depression or panic", "study a valid reason to drop out of a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea) * [I am", "big decisions, if possible; maybe see the student counselor; think about YOUR goals", "where someone is in a PhD programme, and they're very stressed and unhappy,", "or some other family situation that they're stressed about AND they're worried about", "health issue before making any big decisions, if possible; maybe see the student", "first N months; try to think about each problem in isolation; consider a", "drop out of a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea) * [I am currently debating whether to leave", "of absence; etc. Here are some examples of the type of questions I'm", "questions are closed because they aren't a good fit for our Q&A format.", "about money... Usually these questions are closed because they aren't a good fit", "rather than just trying to please parents/advisors; realise that a PhD programme is", "each problem in isolation; consider a leave of absence; etc. Here are some", "problem in isolation; consider a leave of absence; etc. Here are some examples", "my (foreign) country of study a valid reason to drop out of a", "leave my PhD program- any advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice) --- I've created the question and provided", "someone is in a PhD programme, and they're very stressed and unhappy, and", "they're very stressed and unhappy, and want to know if they should quit.", "of Absence from PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd) * [Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem", "in it for the first N months; try to think about each problem", "examples of the type of questions I'm talking about. * [I want to", "giving me anxiety attacks. Is quitting (and losing 2 years) my only option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years)", "friends yet AND they suffer from depression or panic attacks or some other", "[I am currently debating whether to leave my PhD program- any advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice) ---", "attacks or some other mental health problem AND there's a sick relative or", "programme is very different than anything you've likely done before, so don't expect", "of a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea) * [I am currently debating whether to leave my PhD", "Is quitting (and losing 2 years) my only option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years) * [Is feeling lonely", "goals rather than just trying to please parents/advisors; realise that a PhD programme", "PhD program- any advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice) --- I've created the question and provided an answer:", "panic attacks or some other mental health problem AND there's a sick relative", "to think about each problem in isolation; consider a leave of absence; etc.", "(and losing 2 years) my only option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable", "health problem AND there's a sick relative or some other family situation that", "PhD after 4 months. Should I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i) * [Leave of Absence from PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd) *", "useful general answers to a canonical question. E.g., address the mental health issue", "etc. Here are some examples of the type of questions I'm talking about.", "are a number of complicating factors, such as: They're away from home, and", "if possible; maybe see the student counselor; think about YOUR goals rather than", "so don't expect to feel comfortable in it for the first N months;", "expect to feel comfortable in it for the first N months; try to", "answers to a canonical question. E.g., address the mental health issue before making", "student counselor; think about YOUR goals rather than just trying to please parents/advisors;", "I've created the question and provided an answer: [Should I quit my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66846/should-i-quit-my-phd/66847#66847)", "they should quit. Typically, there are a number of complicating factors, such as:", "life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) * [My PhD situation is giving me anxiety attacks. Is quitting (and", "reason to drop out of a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea) * [I am currently debating whether", "and they're very stressed and unhappy, and want to know if they should", "very stressed and unhappy, and want to know if they should quit. Typically,", "think we could offer some useful general answers to a canonical question. E.g.,", "PhD programme, and they're very stressed and unhappy, and want to know if", "a leave of absence; etc. Here are some examples of the type of", "want to know if they should quit. Typically, there are a number of", "we could offer some useful general answers to a canonical question. E.g., address", "before making any big decisions, if possible; maybe see the student counselor; think", "see the student counselor; think about YOUR goals rather than just trying to", "stressed and unhappy, and want to know if they should quit. Typically, there", "months; try to think about each problem in isolation; consider a leave of", "of complicating factors, such as: They're away from home, and haven't made any", "about. * [I want to quit PhD after 4 months. Should I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i) *", "attacks. Is quitting (and losing 2 years) my only option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years) * [Is feeling", "programme, and they're very stressed and unhappy, and want to know if they", "try to think about each problem in isolation; consider a leave of absence;", "quitting (and losing 2 years) my only option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years) * [Is feeling lonely and", "workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) * [My PhD situation is giving me anxiety", "than anything you've likely done before, so don't expect to feel comfortable in", "some other family situation that they're stressed about AND they're worried about money...", "anxiety attacks. Is quitting (and losing 2 years) my only option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years) * [Is", "--- I've created the question and provided an answer: [Should I quit my", "aren't a good fit for our Q&A format. However, I think we could", "general answers to a canonical question. E.g., address the mental health issue before", "realise that a PhD programme is very different than anything you've likely done", "of questions I'm talking about. * [I want to quit PhD after 4", "in a PhD programme, and they're very stressed and unhappy, and want to", "AND they're worried about money... Usually these questions are closed because they aren't", "here where someone is in a PhD programme, and they're very stressed and", "offer some useful general answers to a canonical question. E.g., address the mental", "from PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd) * [Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social", "they're worried about money... Usually these questions are closed because they aren't a", "worried about money... Usually these questions are closed because they aren't a good", "our Q&A format. However, I think we could offer some useful general answers", "that a PhD programme is very different than anything you've likely done before,", "N months; try to think about each problem in isolation; consider a leave", "to drop out of a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea) * [I am currently debating whether to", "isolation; consider a leave of absence; etc. Here are some examples of the", "losing 2 years) my only option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in", "my only option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country", "uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study a valid reason to drop out", "a PhD programme, and they're very stressed and unhappy, and want to know", "a sick relative or some other family situation that they're stressed about AND", "situation that they're stressed about AND they're worried about money... Usually these questions", "suffer from depression or panic attacks or some other mental health problem AND", "it for the first N months; try to think about each problem in", "to leave my PhD program- any advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice) --- I've created the question and", "good fit for our Q&A format. However, I think we could offer some", "counselor; think about YOUR goals rather than just trying to please parents/advisors; realise", "a number of complicating factors, such as: They're away from home, and haven't", "feel comfortable in it for the first N months; try to think about", "option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study", "to know if they should quit. Typically, there are a number of complicating", "other mental health problem AND there's a sick relative or some other family", "making any big decisions, if possible; maybe see the student counselor; think about", "quit PhD after 4 months. Should I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i) * [Leave of Absence from PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd)", "[Leave of Absence from PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd) * [Should I quit my PhD - workload,", "you've likely done before, so don't expect to feel comfortable in it for", "out of a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea) * [I am currently debating whether to leave my", "I've seen a lot of posts on here where someone is in a", "PhD situation is giving me anxiety attacks. Is quitting (and losing 2 years)", "because they aren't a good fit for our Q&A format. However, I think", "are closed because they aren't a good fit for our Q&A format. However,", "a good fit for our Q&A format. However, I think we could offer", "the student counselor; think about YOUR goals rather than just trying to please", "likely done before, so don't expect to feel comfortable in it for the", "home, and haven't made any friends yet AND they suffer from depression or", "problem AND there's a sick relative or some other family situation that they're", "than just trying to please parents/advisors; realise that a PhD programme is very", "* [My PhD situation is giving me anxiety attacks. Is quitting (and losing", "comfortable in it for the first N months; try to think about each", "yet AND they suffer from depression or panic attacks or some other mental", "for our Q&A format. However, I think we could offer some useful general", "a canonical question. E.g., address the mental health issue before making any big", "[Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) * [My", "[Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study a valid", "I think we could offer some useful general answers to a canonical question.", "debating whether to leave my PhD program- any advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice) --- I've created the", "my PhD program- any advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice) --- I've created the question and provided an", "valid reason to drop out of a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea) * [I am currently debating", "a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea) * [I am currently debating whether to leave my PhD program-", "as: They're away from home, and haven't made any friends yet AND they", "AND there's a sick relative or some other family situation that they're stressed", "and provided an answer: [Should I quit my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66846/should-i-quit-my-phd/66847#66847) Additional answers are welcome.", "know if they should quit. Typically, there are a number of complicating factors,", "or panic attacks or some other mental health problem AND there's a sick", "could offer some useful general answers to a canonical question. E.g., address the", "is very different than anything you've likely done before, so don't expect to", "sick relative or some other family situation that they're stressed about AND they're", "in isolation; consider a leave of absence; etc. Here are some examples of", "some examples of the type of questions I'm talking about. * [I want", "I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) * [My PhD", "some useful general answers to a canonical question. E.g., address the mental health", "other family situation that they're stressed about AND they're worried about money... Usually", "question. E.g., address the mental health issue before making any big decisions, if", "maybe see the student counselor; think about YOUR goals rather than just trying", "whether to leave my PhD program- any advice](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9827/i-am-currently-debating-whether-to-leave-my-phd-program-any-advice) --- I've created the question", "seen a lot of posts on here where someone is in a PhD", "They're away from home, and haven't made any friends yet AND they suffer", "think about YOUR goals rather than just trying to please parents/advisors; realise that", "to a canonical question. E.g., address the mental health issue before making any", "relative or some other family situation that they're stressed about AND they're worried", "are some examples of the type of questions I'm talking about. * [I", "done before, so don't expect to feel comfortable in it for the first", "- workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) * [My PhD situation is giving me", "me anxiety attacks. Is quitting (and losing 2 years) my only option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years) *", "I'm talking about. * [I want to quit PhD after 4 months. Should", "PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) * [My PhD situation is giving", "should quit. Typically, there are a number of complicating factors, such as: They're", "[I want to quit PhD after 4 months. Should I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i) * [Leave of", "years) my only option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign)", "or some other mental health problem AND there's a sick relative or some", "self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) * [My PhD situation is giving me anxiety attacks.", "* [Leave of Absence from PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd) * [Should I quit my PhD -", "factors, such as: They're away from home, and haven't made any friends yet", "issue before making any big decisions, if possible; maybe see the student counselor;", "a PhD programme is very different than anything you've likely done before, so", "think about each problem in isolation; consider a leave of absence; etc. Here", "and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study a valid reason to drop", "mental health issue before making any big decisions, if possible; maybe see the", "to please parents/advisors; realise that a PhD programme is very different than anything", "complicating factors, such as: They're away from home, and haven't made any friends", "Here are some examples of the type of questions I'm talking about. *", "mental health problem AND there's a sick relative or some other family situation", "2 years) my only option?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48552/my-phd-situation-is-giving-me-anxiety-attacks-is-quitting-and-losing-2-years) * [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my", "* [Is feeling lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study a", "* [Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) *", "my PhD - workload, self-esteem and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) * [My PhD situation is", "possible; maybe see the student counselor; think about YOUR goals rather than just", "different than anything you've likely done before, so don't expect to feel comfortable", "country of study a valid reason to drop out of a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea) *", "from depression or panic attacks or some other mental health problem AND there's", "address the mental health issue before making any big decisions, if possible; maybe", "for the first N months; try to think about each problem in isolation;", "and social life](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/39017/should-i-quit-my-phd-workload-self-esteem-and-social-life) * [My PhD situation is giving me anxiety attacks. Is", "very different than anything you've likely done before, so don't expect to feel", "leave of absence; etc. Here are some examples of the type of questions", "questions I'm talking about. * [I want to quit PhD after 4 months.", "talking about. * [I want to quit PhD after 4 months. Should I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i)", "months. Should I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i) * [Leave of Absence from PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd) * [Should I quit", "lonely and uncomfortable in my (foreign) country of study a valid reason to", "that they're stressed about AND they're worried about money... Usually these questions are", "absence; etc. Here are some examples of the type of questions I'm talking", "Absence from PHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/47443/leave-of-absence-from-phd) * [Should I quit my PhD - workload, self-esteem and", "type of questions I'm talking about. * [I want to quit PhD after", "don't expect to feel comfortable in it for the first N months; try", "anything you've likely done before, so don't expect to feel comfortable in it", "depression or panic attacks or some other mental health problem AND there's a", "However, I think we could offer some useful general answers to a canonical", "* [I want to quit PhD after 4 months. Should I?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66563/i-want-to-quit-phd-after-4-months-should-i) * [Leave", "[My PhD situation is giving me anxiety attacks. Is quitting (and losing 2", "from home, and haven't made any friends yet AND they suffer from depression", "closed because they aren't a good fit for our Q&A format. However, I", "in my (foreign) country of study a valid reason to drop out of", "of study a valid reason to drop out of a PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/35352/is-feeling-lonely-and-uncomfortable-in-my-foreign-country-of-study-a-valid-rea) * [I", "AND they suffer from depression or panic attacks or some other mental health", "consider a leave of absence; etc. Here are some examples of the type", "Q&A format. However, I think we could offer some useful general answers to" ]
[ "close to Vietnam, I cannot believe in his words. Is he playing racist", "not true, all my advisory team, mentor and two co-mentors, all 3 of", "not providing funding for international student, which is malicious and not true, all", "mentor and two co-mentors, all 3 of them, plus head of department and", "50%, they finished PhD (with scholarship) inUK, and they are all from ASIA!!!", "PhD (with scholarship) inUK, and they are all from ASIA!!! country very close", "all from ASIA!!! country very close to Vietnam, I cannot believe in his", "believe in his words. Is he playing racist card? or political situation changed?", "my advisory team, mentor and two co-mentors, all 3 of them, plus head", "team, mentor and two co-mentors, all 3 of them, plus head of department", "stuff in 50%, they finished PhD (with scholarship) inUK, and they are all", "other academic stuff in 50%, they finished PhD (with scholarship) inUK, and they", "they finished PhD (with scholarship) inUK, and they are all from ASIA!!! country", "of department and her husband, and other academic stuff in 50%, they finished", "head of department and her husband, and other academic stuff in 50%, they", "inUK, and they are all from ASIA!!! country very close to Vietnam, I", "co-mentors, all 3 of them, plus head of department and her husband, and", "all my advisory team, mentor and two co-mentors, all 3 of them, plus", "husband, and other academic stuff in 50%, they finished PhD (with scholarship) inUK,", "academic stuff in 50%, they finished PhD (with scholarship) inUK, and they are", "scholarship) inUK, and they are all from ASIA!!! country very close to Vietnam,", "are all from ASIA!!! country very close to Vietnam, I cannot believe in", "her husband, and other academic stuff in 50%, they finished PhD (with scholarship)", "two co-mentors, all 3 of them, plus head of department and her husband,", "of them, plus head of department and her husband, and other academic stuff", "in 50%, they finished PhD (with scholarship) inUK, and they are all from", "for international student, which is malicious and not true, all my advisory team,", "all 3 of them, plus head of department and her husband, and other", "and her husband, and other academic stuff in 50%, they finished PhD (with", "is not providing funding for international student, which is malicious and not true,", "them, plus head of department and her husband, and other academic stuff in", "Vietnam, I cannot believe in his words. Is he playing racist card? or", "cannot believe in his words. Is he playing racist card? or political situation", "true, all my advisory team, mentor and two co-mentors, all 3 of them,", "they are all from ASIA!!! country very close to Vietnam, I cannot believe", "funding for international student, which is malicious and not true, all my advisory", "student, which is malicious and not true, all my advisory team, mentor and", "international student, which is malicious and not true, all my advisory team, mentor", "advisory team, mentor and two co-mentors, all 3 of them, plus head of", "malicious and not true, all my advisory team, mentor and two co-mentors, all", "and two co-mentors, all 3 of them, plus head of department and her", "UK is not providing funding for international student, which is malicious and not", "providing funding for international student, which is malicious and not true, all my", "and other academic stuff in 50%, they finished PhD (with scholarship) inUK, and", "plus head of department and her husband, and other academic stuff in 50%,", "and they are all from ASIA!!! country very close to Vietnam, I cannot", "ASIA!!! country very close to Vietnam, I cannot believe in his words. Is", "this question,](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66687/why-is-discrimination-based-on-citizenship-allowed-in-phd-funding-in-the-uk) UK is not providing funding for international student, which is malicious", "to this question,](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66687/why-is-discrimination-based-on-citizenship-allowed-in-phd-funding-in-the-uk) UK is not providing funding for international student, which is", "department and her husband, and other academic stuff in 50%, they finished PhD", "[According to this question,](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66687/why-is-discrimination-based-on-citizenship-allowed-in-phd-funding-in-the-uk) UK is not providing funding for international student, which", "which is malicious and not true, all my advisory team, mentor and two", "to Vietnam, I cannot believe in his words. Is he playing racist card?", "question,](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66687/why-is-discrimination-based-on-citizenship-allowed-in-phd-funding-in-the-uk) UK is not providing funding for international student, which is malicious and", "is malicious and not true, all my advisory team, mentor and two co-mentors,", "country very close to Vietnam, I cannot believe in his words. Is he", "finished PhD (with scholarship) inUK, and they are all from ASIA!!! country very", "and not true, all my advisory team, mentor and two co-mentors, all 3", "3 of them, plus head of department and her husband, and other academic", "I cannot believe in his words. Is he playing racist card? or political", "(with scholarship) inUK, and they are all from ASIA!!! country very close to", "from ASIA!!! country very close to Vietnam, I cannot believe in his words.", "very close to Vietnam, I cannot believe in his words. Is he playing" ]
[ "as offensive (which seems extreme to me). Are terms like \"man-hours\" acceptable, or", "community feels. The comment itself was flagged by a user as offensive (which", "is suggesting that gender specific terms should be avoided. I do not know", "know how the community feels. The comment itself was flagged by a user", "(which seems extreme to me). Are terms like \"man-hours\" acceptable, or should we", "seems extreme to me). Are terms like \"man-hours\" acceptable, or should we be", "by a user as offensive (which seems extreme to me). Are terms like", "was flagged by a user as offensive (which seems extreme to me). Are", "to me). Are terms like \"man-hours\" acceptable, or should we be holding ourselves", "user as offensive (which seems extreme to me). Are terms like \"man-hours\" acceptable,", "[comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66824/is-there-any-obligation-for-authors-of-a-paper-to-provide-the-dataset-used-in-th#comment161781_66824) [![Comment](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CcQFI.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CcQFI.png) is suggesting that gender specific terms should be avoided. I do", "terms should be avoided. I do not know how the community feels. The", "specific terms should be avoided. I do not know how the community feels.", "extreme to me). Are terms like \"man-hours\" acceptable, or should we be holding", "like \"man-hours\" acceptable, or should we be holding ourselves to a higher standard?", "how the community feels. The comment itself was flagged by a user as", "itself was flagged by a user as offensive (which seems extreme to me).", "offensive (which seems extreme to me). Are terms like \"man-hours\" acceptable, or should", "[![Comment](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CcQFI.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CcQFI.png) is suggesting that gender specific terms should be avoided. I do not", "be avoided. I do not know how the community feels. The comment itself", "In my mind, this [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66824/is-there-any-obligation-for-authors-of-a-paper-to-provide-the-dataset-used-in-th#comment161781_66824) [![Comment](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CcQFI.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CcQFI.png) is suggesting that gender specific terms should", "not know how the community feels. The comment itself was flagged by a", "suggesting that gender specific terms should be avoided. I do not know how", "I do not know how the community feels. The comment itself was flagged", "feels. The comment itself was flagged by a user as offensive (which seems", "gender specific terms should be avoided. I do not know how the community", "comment itself was flagged by a user as offensive (which seems extreme to", "Are terms like \"man-hours\" acceptable, or should we be holding ourselves to a", "should be avoided. I do not know how the community feels. The comment", "mind, this [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66824/is-there-any-obligation-for-authors-of-a-paper-to-provide-the-dataset-used-in-th#comment161781_66824) [![Comment](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CcQFI.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CcQFI.png) is suggesting that gender specific terms should be avoided.", "terms like \"man-hours\" acceptable, or should we be holding ourselves to a higher", "do not know how the community feels. The comment itself was flagged by", "a user as offensive (which seems extreme to me). Are terms like \"man-hours\"", "avoided. I do not know how the community feels. The comment itself was", "that gender specific terms should be avoided. I do not know how the", "my mind, this [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66824/is-there-any-obligation-for-authors-of-a-paper-to-provide-the-dataset-used-in-th#comment161781_66824) [![Comment](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CcQFI.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CcQFI.png) is suggesting that gender specific terms should be", "me). Are terms like \"man-hours\" acceptable, or should we be holding ourselves to", "the community feels. The comment itself was flagged by a user as offensive", "this [comment](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/66824/is-there-any-obligation-for-authors-of-a-paper-to-provide-the-dataset-used-in-th#comment161781_66824) [![Comment](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CcQFI.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/CcQFI.png) is suggesting that gender specific terms should be avoided. I", "The comment itself was flagged by a user as offensive (which seems extreme", "flagged by a user as offensive (which seems extreme to me). Are terms" ]
[ "at the Bachelor's and Master's levels is exactly the same. Master's courses are", "is exactly the same. Master's courses are just more advanced, and you don't", "is that it makes people realize that [*academia varies more than you think", "almost completed, you start working on your Master's thesis. Thus, from my point", "you think it does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058). One of these variations is the structure of the", "completed, you start working on your Master's thesis. Thus, from my point of", "before the [Kologji process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process), there was not really such a thing as an", "this course is at the Bachelor's or at the Master's level. What kind", "European countries, before the [Kologji process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process), there was not really such a thing", "is organized at the Bachelor's and Master's levels is exactly the same. Master's", "without getting any Bachelor's. After the Kologji process, many things have changed, but", "difference between the Bachelor's level, which counts as undergraduate education, and the Master's", "more advanced, and you don't get an advisor until the very end, when,", "Master's thesis. Thus, from my point of view, most of the undergraduate questions", "has a somehow clearly distinguishable character everywhere, the structural difference between the Bachelor's", "generalizable to graduate education at the Master's level. If a student asks about", "course, there's no difference whether this course is at the Bachelor's or at", "between the Bachelor's level, which counts as undergraduate education, and the Master's level,", "your Master's thesis. Thus, from my point of view, most of the undergraduate", "fuzzy. In many European countries, before the [Kologji process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process), there was not really", "most of the undergraduate questions are automatically generalizable to graduate education at the", "the Master's level. If a student asks about something that happens in a", "graduate education, might be more fuzzy. In many European countries, before the [Kologji", "exams are almost completed, you start working on your Master's thesis. Thus, from", "just more advanced, and you don't get an advisor until the very end,", "start working on your Master's thesis. Thus, from my point of view, most", "which counts as graduate education, might be more fuzzy. In many European countries,", "education is organized at the Bachelor's and Master's levels is exactly the same.", "Master's courses are just more advanced, and you don't get an advisor until", "level has a somehow clearly distinguishable character everywhere, the structural difference between the", "an undergraduate education: you would have studied for 4-5 years straight and got", "variations is the structure of the different education levels. While the PhD level", "of these variations is the structure of the different education levels. While the", "the Bachelor's level, which counts as undergraduate education, and the Master's level, which", "[Kologji process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process), there was not really such a thing as an undergraduate education:", "and got a Master's, without getting any Bachelor's. After the Kologji process, many", "very end, when, once exams are almost completed, you start working on your", "community is that it makes people realize that [*academia varies more than you", "thesis. Thus, from my point of view, most of the undergraduate questions are", "a Master's, without getting any Bachelor's. After the Kologji process, many things have", "when, once exams are almost completed, you start working on your Master's thesis.", "at the Master's level. What kind of undergraduate questions are not really generalizable", "remarkable point of this community is that it makes people realize that [*academia", "are just more advanced, and you don't get an advisor until the very", "have studied for 4-5 years straight and got a Master's, without getting any", "Master's, without getting any Bachelor's. After the Kologji process, many things have changed,", "Bachelor's and Master's levels is exactly the same. Master's courses are just more", "does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058). One of these variations is the structure of the different education levels.", "on your Master's thesis. Thus, from my point of view, most of the", "the Master's level, which counts as graduate education, might be more fuzzy. In", "somehow clearly distinguishable character everywhere, the structural difference between the Bachelor's level, which", "graduate education at the Master's level. If a student asks about something that", "there's no difference whether this course is at the Bachelor's or at the", "from my point of view, most of the undergraduate questions are automatically generalizable", "process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process), there was not really such a thing as an undergraduate education: you", "point of view, most of the undergraduate questions are automatically generalizable to graduate", "end, when, once exams are almost completed, you start working on your Master's", "structural difference between the Bachelor's level, which counts as undergraduate education, and the", "Kologji process, many things have changed, but in several cases the way in", "something that happens in a course, there's no difference whether this course is", "or at the Master's level. What kind of undergraduate questions are not really", "level. What kind of undergraduate questions are not really generalizable to graduate education", "you don't get an advisor until the very end, when, once exams are", "at the Master's level. If a student asks about something that happens in", "PhD level has a somehow clearly distinguishable character everywhere, the structural difference between", "automatically generalizable to graduate education at the Master's level. If a student asks", "that it makes people realize that [*academia varies more than you think it", "kind of undergraduate questions are not really generalizable to graduate education then? *How", "people realize that [*academia varies more than you think it does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058). One of", "don't get an advisor until the very end, when, once exams are almost", "which counts as undergraduate education, and the Master's level, which counts as graduate", "Master's level, which counts as graduate education, might be more fuzzy. In many", "same. Master's courses are just more advanced, and you don't get an advisor", "One of these variations is the structure of the different education levels. While", "a somehow clearly distinguishable character everywhere, the structural difference between the Bachelor's level,", "get an advisor until the very end, when, once exams are almost completed,", "happens in a course, there's no difference whether this course is at the", "studied for 4-5 years straight and got a Master's, without getting any Bachelor's.", "education at the Master's level. If a student asks about something that happens", "varies more than you think it does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058). One of these variations is the", "undergraduate education, and the Master's level, which counts as graduate education, might be", "Master's level. What kind of undergraduate questions are not really generalizable to graduate", "A remarkable point of this community is that it makes people realize that", "cases the way in which education is organized at the Bachelor's and Master's", "you start working on your Master's thesis. Thus, from my point of view,", "got a Master's, without getting any Bachelor's. After the Kologji process, many things", "the Bachelor's and Master's levels is exactly the same. Master's courses are just", "makes people realize that [*academia varies more than you think it does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058). One", "course is at the Bachelor's or at the Master's level. What kind of", "point of this community is that it makes people realize that [*academia varies", "4-5 years straight and got a Master's, without getting any Bachelor's. After the", "levels is exactly the same. Master's courses are just more advanced, and you", "the very end, when, once exams are almost completed, you start working on", "as an undergraduate education: you would have studied for 4-5 years straight and", "straight and got a Master's, without getting any Bachelor's. After the Kologji process,", "you would have studied for 4-5 years straight and got a Master's, without", "the same. Master's courses are just more advanced, and you don't get an", "are almost completed, you start working on your Master's thesis. Thus, from my", "Bachelor's or at the Master's level. What kind of undergraduate questions are not", "it does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058). One of these variations is the structure of the different education", "undergraduate questions are automatically generalizable to graduate education at the Master's level. If", "that happens in a course, there's no difference whether this course is at", "Bachelor's. After the Kologji process, many things have changed, but in several cases", "education levels. While the PhD level has a somehow clearly distinguishable character everywhere,", "several cases the way in which education is organized at the Bachelor's and", "Master's level. If a student asks about something that happens in a course,", "counts as graduate education, might be more fuzzy. In many European countries, before", "at the Bachelor's or at the Master's level. What kind of undergraduate questions", "not really such a thing as an undergraduate education: you would have studied", "to graduate education at the Master's level. If a student asks about something", "undergraduate questions are not really generalizable to graduate education then? *How can we", "are not really generalizable to graduate education then? *How can we draw a", "might be more fuzzy. In many European countries, before the [Kologji process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process), there", "my point of view, most of the undergraduate questions are automatically generalizable to", "really generalizable to graduate education then? *How can we draw a universal line?*", "are automatically generalizable to graduate education at the Master's level. If a student", "a course, there's no difference whether this course is at the Bachelor's or", "After the Kologji process, many things have changed, but in several cases the", "is the structure of the different education levels. While the PhD level has", "years straight and got a Master's, without getting any Bachelor's. After the Kologji", "changed, but in several cases the way in which education is organized at", "levels. While the PhD level has a somehow clearly distinguishable character everywhere, the", "have changed, but in several cases the way in which education is organized", "structure of the different education levels. While the PhD level has a somehow", "Master's levels is exactly the same. Master's courses are just more advanced, and", "student asks about something that happens in a course, there's no difference whether", "counts as undergraduate education, and the Master's level, which counts as graduate education,", "an advisor until the very end, when, once exams are almost completed, you", "once exams are almost completed, you start working on your Master's thesis. Thus,", "of view, most of the undergraduate questions are automatically generalizable to graduate education", "undergraduate education: you would have studied for 4-5 years straight and got a", "many things have changed, but in several cases the way in which education", "view, most of the undergraduate questions are automatically generalizable to graduate education at", "as graduate education, might be more fuzzy. In many European countries, before the", "character everywhere, the structural difference between the Bachelor's level, which counts as undergraduate", "countries, before the [Kologji process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process), there was not really such a thing as", "and Master's levels is exactly the same. Master's courses are just more advanced,", "in a course, there's no difference whether this course is at the Bachelor's", "difference whether this course is at the Bachelor's or at the Master's level.", "in several cases the way in which education is organized at the Bachelor's", "for 4-5 years straight and got a Master's, without getting any Bachelor's. After", "courses are just more advanced, and you don't get an advisor until the", "was not really such a thing as an undergraduate education: you would have", "[*academia varies more than you think it does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058). One of these variations is", "level, which counts as undergraduate education, and the Master's level, which counts as", "as undergraduate education, and the Master's level, which counts as graduate education, might", "the Master's level. What kind of undergraduate questions are not really generalizable to", "a thing as an undergraduate education: you would have studied for 4-5 years", "way in which education is organized at the Bachelor's and Master's levels is", "until the very end, when, once exams are almost completed, you start working", "What kind of undergraduate questions are not really generalizable to graduate education then?", "think it does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058). One of these variations is the structure of the different", "advisor until the very end, when, once exams are almost completed, you start", "but in several cases the way in which education is organized at the", "the different education levels. While the PhD level has a somehow clearly distinguishable", "education: you would have studied for 4-5 years straight and got a Master's,", "distinguishable character everywhere, the structural difference between the Bachelor's level, which counts as", "which education is organized at the Bachelor's and Master's levels is exactly the", "education, and the Master's level, which counts as graduate education, might be more", "of this community is that it makes people realize that [*academia varies more", "the [Kologji process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process), there was not really such a thing as an undergraduate", "the way in which education is organized at the Bachelor's and Master's levels", "a student asks about something that happens in a course, there's no difference", "there was not really such a thing as an undergraduate education: you would", "such a thing as an undergraduate education: you would have studied for 4-5", "that [*academia varies more than you think it does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058). One of these variations", "whether this course is at the Bachelor's or at the Master's level. What", "these variations is the structure of the different education levels. While the PhD", "this community is that it makes people realize that [*academia varies more than", "If a student asks about something that happens in a course, there's no", "different education levels. While the PhD level has a somehow clearly distinguishable character", "clearly distinguishable character everywhere, the structural difference between the Bachelor's level, which counts", "the undergraduate questions are automatically generalizable to graduate education at the Master's level.", "be more fuzzy. In many European countries, before the [Kologji process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process), there was", "more fuzzy. In many European countries, before the [Kologji process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process), there was not", "in which education is organized at the Bachelor's and Master's levels is exactly", "realize that [*academia varies more than you think it does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058). One of these", "the structure of the different education levels. While the PhD level has a", "everywhere, the structural difference between the Bachelor's level, which counts as undergraduate education,", "In many European countries, before the [Kologji process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process), there was not really such", "really such a thing as an undergraduate education: you would have studied for", "the PhD level has a somehow clearly distinguishable character everywhere, the structural difference", "the structural difference between the Bachelor's level, which counts as undergraduate education, and", "getting any Bachelor's. After the Kologji process, many things have changed, but in", "process, many things have changed, but in several cases the way in which", "is at the Bachelor's or at the Master's level. What kind of undergraduate", "While the PhD level has a somehow clearly distinguishable character everywhere, the structural", "would have studied for 4-5 years straight and got a Master's, without getting", "of undergraduate questions are not really generalizable to graduate education then? *How can", "the Kologji process, many things have changed, but in several cases the way", "Bachelor's level, which counts as undergraduate education, and the Master's level, which counts", "advanced, and you don't get an advisor until the very end, when, once", "working on your Master's thesis. Thus, from my point of view, most of", "of the undergraduate questions are automatically generalizable to graduate education at the Master's", "education, might be more fuzzy. In many European countries, before the [Kologji process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process),", "about something that happens in a course, there's no difference whether this course", "questions are automatically generalizable to graduate education at the Master's level. If a", "asks about something that happens in a course, there's no difference whether this", "more than you think it does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058). One of these variations is the structure", "any Bachelor's. After the Kologji process, many things have changed, but in several", "questions are not really generalizable to graduate education then? *How can we draw", "not really generalizable to graduate education then? *How can we draw a universal", "than you think it does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058). One of these variations is the structure of", "thing as an undergraduate education: you would have studied for 4-5 years straight", "Thus, from my point of view, most of the undergraduate questions are automatically", "exactly the same. Master's courses are just more advanced, and you don't get", "no difference whether this course is at the Bachelor's or at the Master's", "the Bachelor's or at the Master's level. What kind of undergraduate questions are", "it makes people realize that [*academia varies more than you think it does*](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/20058).", "level, which counts as graduate education, might be more fuzzy. In many European", "of the different education levels. While the PhD level has a somehow clearly", "things have changed, but in several cases the way in which education is", "and you don't get an advisor until the very end, when, once exams", "many European countries, before the [Kologji process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kologji_Process), there was not really such a", "and the Master's level, which counts as graduate education, might be more fuzzy.", "organized at the Bachelor's and Master's levels is exactly the same. Master's courses", "level. If a student asks about something that happens in a course, there's" ]
[ "to be only one (but rather popular) post tagged with this tag. I", "be only one (but rather popular) post tagged with this tag. I don't", "don't suppose it could generalise to any other question asked so far in", "I don't suppose it could generalise to any other question asked so far", "any other question asked so far in Academia.SE. Is such a tag necessary?", "could generalise to any other question asked so far in Academia.SE. Is such", "There seems to be only one (but rather popular) post tagged with this", "tag. I don't suppose it could generalise to any other question asked so", "called `wetlab`. There seems to be only one (but rather popular) post tagged", "new tag called `wetlab`. There seems to be only one (but rather popular)", "There's a new tag called `wetlab`. There seems to be only one (but", "tagged with this tag. I don't suppose it could generalise to any other", "post tagged with this tag. I don't suppose it could generalise to any", "seems to be only one (but rather popular) post tagged with this tag.", "only one (but rather popular) post tagged with this tag. I don't suppose", "tag called `wetlab`. There seems to be only one (but rather popular) post", "popular) post tagged with this tag. I don't suppose it could generalise to", "rather popular) post tagged with this tag. I don't suppose it could generalise", "`wetlab`. There seems to be only one (but rather popular) post tagged with", "(but rather popular) post tagged with this tag. I don't suppose it could", "with this tag. I don't suppose it could generalise to any other question", "to any other question asked so far in Academia.SE. Is such a tag", "a new tag called `wetlab`. There seems to be only one (but rather", "suppose it could generalise to any other question asked so far in Academia.SE.", "generalise to any other question asked so far in Academia.SE. Is such a", "it could generalise to any other question asked so far in Academia.SE. Is", "one (but rather popular) post tagged with this tag. I don't suppose it", "this tag. I don't suppose it could generalise to any other question asked" ]
[ "since then because of the reactions it got): [How can we fight junk", "a major challenge that academia faces today and will increasingly face in the", "there are some answer-worthy comments with very practical points. Is there a political", "clear and there are some answer-worthy comments with very practical points. Is there", "a question that I believe is about a major challenge that academia faces", "as unclear but I think that question is pretty clear and there are", "in the future (I deleted it since then because of the reactions it", "question is pretty clear and there are some answer-worthy comments with very practical", "few weeks ago I have asked a question that I believe is about", "asked a question that I believe is about a major challenge that academia", "and will increasingly face in the future (I deleted it since then because", "that academia faces today and will increasingly face in the future (I deleted", "major challenge that academia faces today and will increasingly face in the future", "future (I deleted it since then because of the reactions it got): [How", "of the reactions it got): [How can we fight junk science? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science) The", "the reactions it got): [How can we fight junk science? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science) The question", "The question was closed as unclear but I think that question is pretty", "today and will increasingly face in the future (I deleted it since then", "will increasingly face in the future (I deleted it since then because of", "deleted it since then because of the reactions it got): [How can we", "that I believe is about a major challenge that academia faces today and", "question was closed as unclear but I think that question is pretty clear", "unclear but I think that question is pretty clear and there are some", "are some answer-worthy comments with very practical points. Is there a political correctness", "some answer-worthy comments with very practical points. Is there a political correctness component", "junk science? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science) The question was closed as unclear but I think that", "very practical points. Is there a political correctness component or something else that", "have asked a question that I believe is about a major challenge that", "question that I believe is about a major challenge that academia faces today", "(I deleted it since then because of the reactions it got): [How can", "then because of the reactions it got): [How can we fight junk science?", "faces today and will increasingly face in the future (I deleted it since", "I think that question is pretty clear and there are some answer-worthy comments", "that question is pretty clear and there are some answer-worthy comments with very", "answer-worthy comments with very practical points. Is there a political correctness component or", "I believe is about a major challenge that academia faces today and will", "think that question is pretty clear and there are some answer-worthy comments with", "[closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science) The question was closed as unclear but I think that question is", "I have asked a question that I believe is about a major challenge", "increasingly face in the future (I deleted it since then because of the", "because of the reactions it got): [How can we fight junk science? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science)", "ago I have asked a question that I believe is about a major", "was closed as unclear but I think that question is pretty clear and", "points. Is there a political correctness component or something else that I'm missing?", "closed as unclear but I think that question is pretty clear and there", "but I think that question is pretty clear and there are some answer-worthy", "reactions it got): [How can we fight junk science? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science) The question was", "weeks ago I have asked a question that I believe is about a", "pretty clear and there are some answer-worthy comments with very practical points. Is", "is pretty clear and there are some answer-worthy comments with very practical points.", "comments with very practical points. Is there a political correctness component or something", "about a major challenge that academia faces today and will increasingly face in", "academia faces today and will increasingly face in the future (I deleted it", "is about a major challenge that academia faces today and will increasingly face", "A few weeks ago I have asked a question that I believe is", "science? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science) The question was closed as unclear but I think that question", "face in the future (I deleted it since then because of the reactions", "challenge that academia faces today and will increasingly face in the future (I", "got): [How can we fight junk science? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science) The question was closed as", "can we fight junk science? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science) The question was closed as unclear but", "we fight junk science? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science) The question was closed as unclear but I", "it got): [How can we fight junk science? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science) The question was closed", "[How can we fight junk science? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science) The question was closed as unclear", "fight junk science? [closed]](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64840/how-can-we-fight-junk-science) The question was closed as unclear but I think", "and there are some answer-worthy comments with very practical points. Is there a", "with very practical points. Is there a political correctness component or something else", "the future (I deleted it since then because of the reactions it got):", "it since then because of the reactions it got): [How can we fight", "practical points. Is there a political correctness component or something else that I'm", "believe is about a major challenge that academia faces today and will increasingly" ]
[ "Sometimes, malicious (usually new) users post * a question that is obviously not", "hypothetical situation that the asker is honestly interested in (note that I am", "question that is obviously not about a real situation or even a hypothetical", "that the asker is honestly interested in (note that I am not talking", "advice, but intentionally bad advice. How should I deal with such posts or", "(note that I am not talking about [possibly made-up clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734) but more blatant", "obviously not about a real situation or even a hypothetical situation that the", "asker is honestly interested in (note that I am not talking about [possibly", "blatant examples such as [this one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734) or worse); * an answer that technically", "clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734) but more blatant examples such as [this one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734) or worse); * an", "intentionally bad advice. How should I deal with such posts or posts that", "answer that technically addresses the question but is obviously not honest advice, but", "one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734) or worse); * an answer that technically addresses the question but is", "(usually new) users post * a question that is obviously not about a", "new) users post * a question that is obviously not about a real", "post * a question that is obviously not about a real situation or", "made-up clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734) but more blatant examples such as [this one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734) or worse); *", "[this one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734) or worse); * an answer that technically addresses the question but", "situation that the asker is honestly interested in (note that I am not", "the asker is honestly interested in (note that I am not talking about", "I deal with such posts or posts that I strongly suspect to fall", "real situation or even a hypothetical situation that the asker is honestly interested", "users post * a question that is obviously not about a real situation", "addresses the question but is obviously not honest advice, but intentionally bad advice.", "is obviously not honest advice, but intentionally bad advice. How should I deal", "honestly interested in (note that I am not talking about [possibly made-up clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734)", "but intentionally bad advice. How should I deal with such posts or posts", "is obviously not about a real situation or even a hypothetical situation that", "or worse); * an answer that technically addresses the question but is obviously", "* an answer that technically addresses the question but is obviously not honest", "but is obviously not honest advice, but intentionally bad advice. How should I", "that technically addresses the question but is obviously not honest advice, but intentionally", "that I am not talking about [possibly made-up clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734) but more blatant examples", "such posts or posts that I strongly suspect to fall in the above", "interested in (note that I am not talking about [possibly made-up clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734) but", "honest advice, but intentionally bad advice. How should I deal with such posts", "a question that is obviously not about a real situation or even a", "situation or even a hypothetical situation that the asker is honestly interested in", "a hypothetical situation that the asker is honestly interested in (note that I", "is honestly interested in (note that I am not talking about [possibly made-up", "in (note that I am not talking about [possibly made-up clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734) but more", "as [this one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734) or worse); * an answer that technically addresses the question", "even a hypothetical situation that the asker is honestly interested in (note that", "technically addresses the question but is obviously not honest advice, but intentionally bad", "worse); * an answer that technically addresses the question but is obviously not", "deal with such posts or posts that I strongly suspect to fall in", "not about a real situation or even a hypothetical situation that the asker", "more blatant examples such as [this one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734) or worse); * an answer that", "* a question that is obviously not about a real situation or even", "about a real situation or even a hypothetical situation that the asker is", "question but is obviously not honest advice, but intentionally bad advice. How should", "with such posts or posts that I strongly suspect to fall in the", "the question but is obviously not honest advice, but intentionally bad advice. How", "posts or posts that I strongly suspect to fall in the above category?", "am not talking about [possibly made-up clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734) but more blatant examples such as", "that is obviously not about a real situation or even a hypothetical situation", "How should I deal with such posts or posts that I strongly suspect", "talking about [possibly made-up clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734) but more blatant examples such as [this one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734)", "[possibly made-up clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734) but more blatant examples such as [this one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734) or worse);", "such as [this one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734) or worse); * an answer that technically addresses the", "about [possibly made-up clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734) but more blatant examples such as [this one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734) or", "malicious (usually new) users post * a question that is obviously not about", "an answer that technically addresses the question but is obviously not honest advice,", "not talking about [possibly made-up clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734) but more blatant examples such as [this", "I am not talking about [possibly made-up clickbait](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2085/7734) but more blatant examples such", "examples such as [this one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734) or worse); * an answer that technically addresses", "advice. How should I deal with such posts or posts that I strongly", "a real situation or even a hypothetical situation that the asker is honestly", "but more blatant examples such as [this one](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3293/7734) or worse); * an answer", "not honest advice, but intentionally bad advice. How should I deal with such", "bad advice. How should I deal with such posts or posts that I", "or even a hypothetical situation that the asker is honestly interested in (note", "obviously not honest advice, but intentionally bad advice. How should I deal with", "should I deal with such posts or posts that I strongly suspect to" ]
[ "the only thing that stands between civilization and obscurantism. I have already endured", "have strong opinions against a publisher. This ad pops up frequently on the", "a publisher. This ad pops up frequently on the homepage, alternating with useful,", "**Should we really use our SE for this kind of promotion?** --- Note:", "users of this site endorse these opinions. Only experienced users know that a", "Notwithstanding the fact that I don't think it's helpful to anyone to gather", "on the generic issue, not for posts or comments trying to convince me", "of users of this site who sometimes use their real names. Especially early", "to a website listing people who have strong opinions against a publisher. This", "this site endorse these opinions. Only experienced users know that a very low", "of up-votes will trigger these ads to show up. Notwithstanding the fact that", "this site who sometimes use their real names. Especially early career academics certainly", "posts or comments trying to convince me said website is the only thing", "[One of our community promotion ads](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/2158/10643) redirects to a website listing people who", "early career academics certainly don't need that kind of negative publicity. **Should we", "pops up frequently on the homepage, alternating with useful, fun and politically neutral", "of this site endorse these opinions. Only experienced users know that a very", "and obscurantism. I have already endured hours of vociferous campaigning along that line.", "generic issue, not for posts or comments trying to convince me said website", "sometimes use their real names. Especially early career academics certainly don't need that", "that stands between civilization and obscurantism. I have already endured hours of vociferous", "Only experienced users know that a very low threshold of up-votes will trigger", "listing people who have strong opinions against a publisher. This ad pops up", "threshold of up-votes will trigger these ads to show up. Notwithstanding the fact", "with useful, fun and politically neutral ads, and could give the impression that", "--- Note: I'm looking for answers on the generic issue, not for posts", "comments trying to convince me said website is the only thing that stands", "promotion ads](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/2158/10643) redirects to a website listing people who have strong opinions against", "our community promotion ads](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/2158/10643) redirects to a website listing people who have strong", "is the only thing that stands between civilization and obscurantism. I have already", "up. Notwithstanding the fact that I don't think it's helpful to anyone to", "website is the only thing that stands between civilization and obscurantism. I have", "experienced users know that a very low threshold of up-votes will trigger these", "Note: I'm looking for answers on the generic issue, not for posts or", "this kind of promotion?** --- Note: I'm looking for answers on the generic", "or comments trying to convince me said website is the only thing that", "use our SE for this kind of promotion?** --- Note: I'm looking for", "homepage, alternating with useful, fun and politically neutral ads, and could give the", "majority of users of this site endorse these opinions. Only experienced users know", "me said website is the only thing that stands between civilization and obscurantism.", "strong opinions against a publisher. This ad pops up frequently on the homepage,", "to that cause, I think it might tarnish the reputation of users of", "I don't think it's helpful to anyone to gather academics to that cause,", "of users of this site endorse these opinions. Only experienced users know that", "don't need that kind of negative publicity. **Should we really use our SE", "very low threshold of up-votes will trigger these ads to show up. Notwithstanding", "I think it might tarnish the reputation of users of this site who", "reputation of users of this site who sometimes use their real names. Especially", "might tarnish the reputation of users of this site who sometimes use their", "only thing that stands between civilization and obscurantism. I have already endured hours", "really use our SE for this kind of promotion?** --- Note: I'm looking", "said website is the only thing that stands between civilization and obscurantism. I", "up frequently on the homepage, alternating with useful, fun and politically neutral ads,", "This ad pops up frequently on the homepage, alternating with useful, fun and", "fact that I don't think it's helpful to anyone to gather academics to", "neutral ads, and could give the impression that a majority of users of", "don't think it's helpful to anyone to gather academics to that cause, I", "issue, not for posts or comments trying to convince me said website is", "ads to show up. Notwithstanding the fact that I don't think it's helpful", "a majority of users of this site endorse these opinions. Only experienced users", "trigger these ads to show up. Notwithstanding the fact that I don't think", "the generic issue, not for posts or comments trying to convince me said", "that a very low threshold of up-votes will trigger these ads to show", "it's helpful to anyone to gather academics to that cause, I think it", "it might tarnish the reputation of users of this site who sometimes use", "need that kind of negative publicity. **Should we really use our SE for", "thing that stands between civilization and obscurantism. I have already endured hours of", "could give the impression that a majority of users of this site endorse", "of negative publicity. **Should we really use our SE for this kind of", "alternating with useful, fun and politically neutral ads, and could give the impression", "helpful to anyone to gather academics to that cause, I think it might", "to convince me said website is the only thing that stands between civilization", "know that a very low threshold of up-votes will trigger these ads to", "to gather academics to that cause, I think it might tarnish the reputation", "publicity. **Should we really use our SE for this kind of promotion?** ---", "not for posts or comments trying to convince me said website is the", "publisher. This ad pops up frequently on the homepage, alternating with useful, fun", "of promotion?** --- Note: I'm looking for answers on the generic issue, not", "against a publisher. This ad pops up frequently on the homepage, alternating with", "site endorse these opinions. Only experienced users know that a very low threshold", "certainly don't need that kind of negative publicity. **Should we really use our", "give the impression that a majority of users of this site endorse these", "users know that a very low threshold of up-votes will trigger these ads", "these ads to show up. Notwithstanding the fact that I don't think it's", "tarnish the reputation of users of this site who sometimes use their real", "politically neutral ads, and could give the impression that a majority of users", "anyone to gather academics to that cause, I think it might tarnish the", "we really use our SE for this kind of promotion?** --- Note: I'm", "convince me said website is the only thing that stands between civilization and", "ads, and could give the impression that a majority of users of this", "that a majority of users of this site endorse these opinions. Only experienced", "and could give the impression that a majority of users of this site", "of our community promotion ads](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/2158/10643) redirects to a website listing people who have", "think it might tarnish the reputation of users of this site who sometimes", "on the homepage, alternating with useful, fun and politically neutral ads, and could", "endorse these opinions. Only experienced users know that a very low threshold of", "stands between civilization and obscurantism. I have already endured hours of vociferous campaigning", "a very low threshold of up-votes will trigger these ads to show up.", "who sometimes use their real names. Especially early career academics certainly don't need", "of this site who sometimes use their real names. Especially early career academics", "useful, fun and politically neutral ads, and could give the impression that a", "think it's helpful to anyone to gather academics to that cause, I think", "names. Especially early career academics certainly don't need that kind of negative publicity.", "ad pops up frequently on the homepage, alternating with useful, fun and politically", "kind of negative publicity. **Should we really use our SE for this kind", "our SE for this kind of promotion?** --- Note: I'm looking for answers", "SE for this kind of promotion?** --- Note: I'm looking for answers on", "use their real names. Especially early career academics certainly don't need that kind", "who have strong opinions against a publisher. This ad pops up frequently on", "promotion?** --- Note: I'm looking for answers on the generic issue, not for", "these opinions. Only experienced users know that a very low threshold of up-votes", "that I don't think it's helpful to anyone to gather academics to that", "will trigger these ads to show up. Notwithstanding the fact that I don't", "the reputation of users of this site who sometimes use their real names.", "users of this site who sometimes use their real names. Especially early career", "academics to that cause, I think it might tarnish the reputation of users", "opinions. Only experienced users know that a very low threshold of up-votes will", "for this kind of promotion?** --- Note: I'm looking for answers on the", "that cause, I think it might tarnish the reputation of users of this", "opinions against a publisher. This ad pops up frequently on the homepage, alternating", "ads](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/2158/10643) redirects to a website listing people who have strong opinions against a", "redirects to a website listing people who have strong opinions against a publisher.", "to show up. Notwithstanding the fact that I don't think it's helpful to", "cause, I think it might tarnish the reputation of users of this site", "to anyone to gather academics to that cause, I think it might tarnish", "I'm looking for answers on the generic issue, not for posts or comments", "show up. Notwithstanding the fact that I don't think it's helpful to anyone", "community promotion ads](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/2158/10643) redirects to a website listing people who have strong opinions", "answers on the generic issue, not for posts or comments trying to convince", "civilization and obscurantism. I have already endured hours of vociferous campaigning along that", "between civilization and obscurantism. I have already endured hours of vociferous campaigning along", "frequently on the homepage, alternating with useful, fun and politically neutral ads, and", "gather academics to that cause, I think it might tarnish the reputation of", "people who have strong opinions against a publisher. This ad pops up frequently", "real names. Especially early career academics certainly don't need that kind of negative", "trying to convince me said website is the only thing that stands between", "impression that a majority of users of this site endorse these opinions. Only", "the fact that I don't think it's helpful to anyone to gather academics", "up-votes will trigger these ads to show up. Notwithstanding the fact that I", "a website listing people who have strong opinions against a publisher. This ad", "that kind of negative publicity. **Should we really use our SE for this", "and politically neutral ads, and could give the impression that a majority of", "career academics certainly don't need that kind of negative publicity. **Should we really", "Especially early career academics certainly don't need that kind of negative publicity. **Should", "negative publicity. **Should we really use our SE for this kind of promotion?**", "for answers on the generic issue, not for posts or comments trying to", "site who sometimes use their real names. Especially early career academics certainly don't", "for posts or comments trying to convince me said website is the only", "the impression that a majority of users of this site endorse these opinions.", "the homepage, alternating with useful, fun and politically neutral ads, and could give", "website listing people who have strong opinions against a publisher. This ad pops", "looking for answers on the generic issue, not for posts or comments trying", "academics certainly don't need that kind of negative publicity. **Should we really use", "kind of promotion?** --- Note: I'm looking for answers on the generic issue,", "fun and politically neutral ads, and could give the impression that a majority", "low threshold of up-votes will trigger these ads to show up. Notwithstanding the", "their real names. Especially early career academics certainly don't need that kind of" ]
[ "certain countries. [Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions) is in a similar position. [It has recently been suggested", "between countries, and we have country tags like [united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states \"show questions tagged 'united-states'\")", "country tags visually distinct? If so, which design would be useful? --- *Edit*:", "substantially between countries, and we have country tags like [united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states \"show questions tagged", "apply to other SE sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631), and anyway, [it would require SE development work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140).", "development work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140). So I have [asked the general question about visually enhancing country", "work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140). So I have [asked the general question about visually enhancing country tags", "to the specific country asked about. The current top-voted answer suggests adding a", "a similar position. [It has recently been suggested there to make country tags", "similar position. [It has recently been suggested there to make country tags visually", "country tags at Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777), linking here. We could still use this thread to", "actually see that the question is specific and don't jump in with answers", "that the question is specific and don't jump in with answers that may", "visually distinct? If so, which design would be useful? --- *Edit*: At Workplace,", "to indicate questions that are *specific* to certain countries. [Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions) is in a", "and anyway, [it would require SE development work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140). So I have [asked the", "Workplace, [StrongBad notes that this would also apply to other SE sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631), and", "that are *specific* to certain countries. [Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions) is in a similar position. [It", "tags visually distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct), essentially so answerers actually see that the question is specific", "*Edit*: At Workplace, [StrongBad notes that this would also apply to other SE", "useful? --- *Edit*: At Workplace, [StrongBad notes that this would also apply to", "quite substantially between countries, and we have country tags like [united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states \"show questions", "make country tags visually distinct? If so, which design would be useful? ---", "like [united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states \"show questions tagged 'united-states'\") or [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\"), which", "general question about visually enhancing country tags at Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777), linking here. We could", "visually distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct), essentially so answerers actually see that the question is specific and", "(try to) make country tags visually distinct? If so, which design would be", "suggested there to make country tags visually distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct), essentially so answerers actually see", "'germany'\"), which serve to indicate questions that are *specific* to certain countries. [Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions)", "and don't jump in with answers that may not apply to the specific", "distinct? If so, which design would be useful? --- *Edit*: At Workplace, [StrongBad", "We could still use this thread to discuss whether we would want to", "discuss whether we would want to actually use such a feature if it", "serve to indicate questions that are *specific* to certain countries. [Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions) is in", "would be useful? --- *Edit*: At Workplace, [StrongBad notes that this would also", "or [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\"), which serve to indicate questions that are", "that may not apply to the specific country asked about. The current top-voted", "questions tagged 'united-states'\") or [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\"), which serve to indicate", "recently been suggested there to make country tags visually distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct), essentially so answerers", "also (try to) make country tags visually distinct? If so, which design would", "[united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states \"show questions tagged 'united-states'\") or [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\"), which serve", "top-voted answer suggests adding a stylized globe to Workplace country tags. Question: should", "to certain countries. [Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions) is in a similar position. [It has recently been", "If so, which design would be useful? --- *Edit*: At Workplace, [StrongBad notes", "*specific* to certain countries. [Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions) is in a similar position. [It has recently", "tagged 'germany'\"), which serve to indicate questions that are *specific* to certain countries.", "[asked the general question about visually enhancing country tags at Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777), linking here.", "have country tags like [united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states \"show questions tagged 'united-states'\") or [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions", "[It has recently been suggested there to make country tags visually distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct), essentially", "also apply to other SE sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631), and anyway, [it would require SE development", "\"show questions tagged 'united-states'\") or [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\"), which serve to", "position. [It has recently been suggested there to make country tags visually distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct),", "which serve to indicate questions that are *specific* to certain countries. [Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions) is", "country asked about. The current top-voted answer suggests adding a stylized globe to", "--- *Edit*: At Workplace, [StrongBad notes that this would also apply to other", "other SE sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631), and anyway, [it would require SE development work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140). So I", "the question is specific and don't jump in with answers that may not", "questions tagged 'germany'\"), which serve to indicate questions that are *specific* to certain", "linking here. We could still use this thread to discuss whether we would", "ed systems differ quite substantially between countries, and we have country tags like", "tags like [united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states \"show questions tagged 'united-states'\") or [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\"),", "'united-states'\") or [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\"), which serve to indicate questions that", "adding a stylized globe to Workplace country tags. Question: should we also (try", "The current top-voted answer suggests adding a stylized globe to Workplace country tags.", "to) make country tags visually distinct? If so, which design would be useful?", "[StrongBad notes that this would also apply to other SE sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631), and anyway,", "about. The current top-voted answer suggests adding a stylized globe to Workplace country", "are *specific* to certain countries. [Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions) is in a similar position. [It has", "the general question about visually enhancing country tags at Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777), linking here. We", "tags visually distinct? If so, which design would be useful? --- *Edit*: At", "distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct), essentially so answerers actually see that the question is specific and don't", "this thread to discuss whether we would want to actually use such a", "that this would also apply to other SE sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631), and anyway, [it would", "the specific country asked about. The current top-voted answer suggests adding a stylized", "is in a similar position. [It has recently been suggested there to make", "stylized globe to Workplace country tags. Question: should we also (try to) make", "has recently been suggested there to make country tags visually distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct), essentially so", "in a similar position. [It has recently been suggested there to make country", "At Workplace, [StrongBad notes that this would also apply to other SE sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631),", "anyway, [it would require SE development work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140). So I have [asked the general", "may not apply to the specific country asked about. The current top-voted answer", "be useful? --- *Edit*: At Workplace, [StrongBad notes that this would also apply", "Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777), linking here. We could still use this thread to discuss whether we", "in with answers that may not apply to the specific country asked about.", "so answerers actually see that the question is specific and don't jump in", "don't jump in with answers that may not apply to the specific country", "\"show questions tagged 'germany'\"), which serve to indicate questions that are *specific* to", "question about visually enhancing country tags at Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777), linking here. We could still", "visually enhancing country tags at Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777), linking here. We could still use this", "enhancing country tags at Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777), linking here. We could still use this thread", "tags. Question: should we also (try to) make country tags visually distinct? If", "to discuss whether we would want to actually use such a feature if", "country tags like [united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states \"show questions tagged 'united-states'\") or [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged", "use this thread to discuss whether we would want to actually use such", "and we have country tags like [united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states \"show questions tagged 'united-states'\") or [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany", "should we also (try to) make country tags visually distinct? If so, which", "at Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777), linking here. We could still use this thread to discuss whether", "still use this thread to discuss whether we would want to actually use", "apply to the specific country asked about. The current top-voted answer suggests adding", "suggests adding a stylized globe to Workplace country tags. Question: should we also", "notes that this would also apply to other SE sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631), and anyway, [it", "SE sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631), and anyway, [it would require SE development work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140). So I have", "tags at Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777), linking here. We could still use this thread to discuss", "country tags visually distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct), essentially so answerers actually see that the question is", "globe to Workplace country tags. Question: should we also (try to) make country", "jump in with answers that may not apply to the specific country asked", "not apply to the specific country asked about. The current top-voted answer suggests", "tagged 'united-states'\") or [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\"), which serve to indicate questions", "design would be useful? --- *Edit*: At Workplace, [StrongBad notes that this would", "which design would be useful? --- *Edit*: At Workplace, [StrongBad notes that this", "SE development work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140). So I have [asked the general question about visually enhancing", "is specific and don't jump in with answers that may not apply to", "about visually enhancing country tags at Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777), linking here. We could still use", "we have country tags like [united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states \"show questions tagged 'united-states'\") or [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show", "question is specific and don't jump in with answers that may not apply", "differ quite substantially between countries, and we have country tags like [united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states \"show", "make country tags visually distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct), essentially so answerers actually see that the question", "could still use this thread to discuss whether we would want to actually", "here. We could still use this thread to discuss whether we would want", "Question: should we also (try to) make country tags visually distinct? If so,", "So I have [asked the general question about visually enhancing country tags at", "would require SE development work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140). So I have [asked the general question about", "systems differ quite substantially between countries, and we have country tags like [united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states", "require SE development work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140). So I have [asked the general question about visually", "questions that are *specific* to certain countries. [Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions) is in a similar position.", "specific country asked about. The current top-voted answer suggests adding a stylized globe", "to make country tags visually distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct), essentially so answerers actually see that the", "current top-voted answer suggests adding a stylized globe to Workplace country tags. Question:", "sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631), and anyway, [it would require SE development work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140). So I have [asked", "countries. [Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions) is in a similar position. [It has recently been suggested there", "indicate questions that are *specific* to certain countries. [Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions) is in a similar", "so, which design would be useful? --- *Edit*: At Workplace, [StrongBad notes that", "I have [asked the general question about visually enhancing country tags at Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777),", "see that the question is specific and don't jump in with answers that", "there to make country tags visually distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct), essentially so answerers actually see that", "we also (try to) make country tags visually distinct? If so, which design", "[it would require SE development work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140). So I have [asked the general question", "would also apply to other SE sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631), and anyway, [it would require SE", "to Workplace country tags. Question: should we also (try to) make country tags", "[Workplace.SE](https://workplace.stackexchange.com/questions) is in a similar position. [It has recently been suggested there to", "Workplace country tags. Question: should we also (try to) make country tags visually", "to other SE sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631), and anyway, [it would require SE development work](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3328/4140). So", "country tags. Question: should we also (try to) make country tags visually distinct?", "answer suggests adding a stylized globe to Workplace country tags. Question: should we", "this would also apply to other SE sites](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct?noredirect=1#comment9175_3631), and anyway, [it would require", "[germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\"), which serve to indicate questions that are *specific*", "thread to discuss whether we would want to actually use such a feature", "we would want to actually use such a feature if it is implemented.", "answers that may not apply to the specific country asked about. The current", "been suggested there to make country tags visually distinct](https://workplace.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3631/should-we-make-country-tags-visually-distinct), essentially so answerers actually", "asked about. The current top-voted answer suggests adding a stylized globe to Workplace", "essentially so answerers actually see that the question is specific and don't jump", "Higher ed systems differ quite substantially between countries, and we have country tags", "countries, and we have country tags like [united-states](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/united-states \"show questions tagged 'united-states'\") or", "with answers that may not apply to the specific country asked about. The", "answerers actually see that the question is specific and don't jump in with", "have [asked the general question about visually enhancing country tags at Meta](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/279254/256777), linking", "specific and don't jump in with answers that may not apply to the", "whether we would want to actually use such a feature if it is", "a stylized globe to Workplace country tags. Question: should we also (try to)" ]
[ "lacks a scientific model. Is it alright for him/her to turn to Academia.SE", "where to begin the research. Is it OK for him/her to ask for", "to begin the research. Is it OK for him/her to ask for resources?", "student who is struggling to complete a thesis. The subject of his/her thesis", "is yet to be discussed widely. It even lacks a scientific model. Is", "it alright for him/her to turn to Academia.SE to ask for guidance on", "the field and is yet to be discussed widely. It even lacks a", "subject of his/her thesis is a relatively new subject in the field and", "scientific model. Is it alright for him/her to turn to Academia.SE to ask", "It even lacks a scientific model. Is it alright for him/her to turn", "alright for him/her to turn to Academia.SE to ask for guidance on where", "turn to Academia.SE to ask for guidance on where to begin the research.", "guidance on where to begin the research. Is it OK for him/her to", "thesis. The subject of his/her thesis is a relatively new subject in the", "of his/her thesis is a relatively new subject in the field and is", "a graduate student who is struggling to complete a thesis. The subject of", "discussed widely. It even lacks a scientific model. Is it alright for him/her", "widely. It even lacks a scientific model. Is it alright for him/her to", "for guidance on where to begin the research. Is it OK for him/her", "field and is yet to be discussed widely. It even lacks a scientific", "Academia.SE to ask for guidance on where to begin the research. Is it", "to be discussed widely. It even lacks a scientific model. Is it alright", "him/her to turn to Academia.SE to ask for guidance on where to begin", "Is it alright for him/her to turn to Academia.SE to ask for guidance", "who is struggling to complete a thesis. The subject of his/her thesis is", "be discussed widely. It even lacks a scientific model. Is it alright for", "on where to begin the research. Is it OK for him/her to ask", "graduate student who is struggling to complete a thesis. The subject of his/her", "yet to be discussed widely. It even lacks a scientific model. Is it", "struggling to complete a thesis. The subject of his/her thesis is a relatively", "even lacks a scientific model. Is it alright for him/her to turn to", "a relatively new subject in the field and is yet to be discussed", "and is yet to be discussed widely. It even lacks a scientific model.", "Imagine a graduate student who is struggling to complete a thesis. The subject", "model. Is it alright for him/her to turn to Academia.SE to ask for", "to turn to Academia.SE to ask for guidance on where to begin the", "to ask for guidance on where to begin the research. Is it OK", "his/her thesis is a relatively new subject in the field and is yet", "thesis is a relatively new subject in the field and is yet to", "relatively new subject in the field and is yet to be discussed widely.", "The subject of his/her thesis is a relatively new subject in the field", "a scientific model. Is it alright for him/her to turn to Academia.SE to", "is a relatively new subject in the field and is yet to be", "to Academia.SE to ask for guidance on where to begin the research. Is", "subject in the field and is yet to be discussed widely. It even", "to complete a thesis. The subject of his/her thesis is a relatively new", "complete a thesis. The subject of his/her thesis is a relatively new subject", "for him/her to turn to Academia.SE to ask for guidance on where to", "a thesis. The subject of his/her thesis is a relatively new subject in", "new subject in the field and is yet to be discussed widely. It", "ask for guidance on where to begin the research. Is it OK for", "is struggling to complete a thesis. The subject of his/her thesis is a", "in the field and is yet to be discussed widely. It even lacks" ]
[ "UK who are EU nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk) * [How would the UK leaving the EU", "now that the referendum resulted Brexit. Therefore, any answer to such questions is", "the UK who are EU nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk) * [How would the UK leaving the", "Brexit on this site. I have lots of questions related to Brexit, but", "of questions related to Brexit on this site. I have lots of questions", "* *Nobody* knows yet what will happen now that the referendum resulted Brexit.", "false hopes/promises at worst. Some affected questions: * [Could Brexit negatively affect PhD", "questions related to Brexit on this site. I have lots of questions related", "questions related to Brexit, but I don't ask them because nobody can answer", "them because nobody can answer them. I propose we close those questions, because:", "close those questions, because: * Although the electorate voted to leave the European", "propose we close those questions, because: * Although the electorate voted to leave", "such questions is speculation at best and giving false hopes/promises at worst. Some", "negatively affect PhD students in the UK who are EU nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk) * [How", "There are a number of questions related to Brexit on this site. I", "related to Brexit on this site. I have lots of questions related to", "Brexit. Therefore, any answer to such questions is speculation at best and giving", "will happen now that the referendum resulted Brexit. Therefore, any answer to such", "Brexit will happen. * *Nobody* knows yet what will happen now that the", "at best and giving false hopes/promises at worst. Some affected questions: * [Could", "happen now that the referendum resulted Brexit. Therefore, any answer to such questions", "answer them. I propose we close those questions, because: * Although the electorate", "I have lots of questions related to Brexit, but I don't ask them", "resulted Brexit. Therefore, any answer to such questions is speculation at best and", "Brexit, but I don't ask them because nobody can answer them. I propose", "lots of questions related to Brexit, but I don't ask them because nobody", "best and giving false hopes/promises at worst. Some affected questions: * [Could Brexit", "European Union, it is still not formally certain that Brexit will happen. *", "still not formally certain that Brexit will happen. * *Nobody* knows yet what", "Although the electorate voted to leave the European Union, it is still not", "but I don't ask them because nobody can answer them. I propose we", "it is still not formally certain that Brexit will happen. * *Nobody* knows", "happen. * *Nobody* knows yet what will happen now that the referendum resulted", "I propose we close those questions, because: * Although the electorate voted to", "knows yet what will happen now that the referendum resulted Brexit. Therefore, any", "site. I have lots of questions related to Brexit, but I don't ask", "the referendum resulted Brexit. Therefore, any answer to such questions is speculation at", "number of questions related to Brexit on this site. I have lots of", "not formally certain that Brexit will happen. * *Nobody* knows yet what will", "Union, it is still not formally certain that Brexit will happen. * *Nobody*", "in the UK who are EU nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk) * [How would the UK leaving", "* [How would the UK leaving the EU affect academia and PhD admission?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/64963/how-would-the-uk-leaving-the-eu-affect-academia-and-phd-admission)", "a number of questions related to Brexit on this site. I have lots", "related to Brexit, but I don't ask them because nobody can answer them.", "I don't ask them because nobody can answer them. I propose we close", "have lots of questions related to Brexit, but I don't ask them because", "questions is speculation at best and giving false hopes/promises at worst. Some affected", "to such questions is speculation at best and giving false hopes/promises at worst.", "answer to such questions is speculation at best and giving false hopes/promises at", "what will happen now that the referendum resulted Brexit. Therefore, any answer to", "voted to leave the European Union, it is still not formally certain that", "don't ask them because nobody can answer them. I propose we close those", "* Although the electorate voted to leave the European Union, it is still", "that Brexit will happen. * *Nobody* knows yet what will happen now that", "we close those questions, because: * Although the electorate voted to leave the", "because: * Although the electorate voted to leave the European Union, it is", "at worst. Some affected questions: * [Could Brexit negatively affect PhD students in", "because nobody can answer them. I propose we close those questions, because: *", "nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk) * [How would the UK leaving the EU affect academia and PhD", "formally certain that Brexit will happen. * *Nobody* knows yet what will happen", "hopes/promises at worst. Some affected questions: * [Could Brexit negatively affect PhD students", "are a number of questions related to Brexit on this site. I have", "and giving false hopes/promises at worst. Some affected questions: * [Could Brexit negatively", "who are EU nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk) * [How would the UK leaving the EU affect", "questions: * [Could Brexit negatively affect PhD students in the UK who are", "Brexit negatively affect PhD students in the UK who are EU nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk) *", "worst. Some affected questions: * [Could Brexit negatively affect PhD students in the", "of questions related to Brexit, but I don't ask them because nobody can", "leave the European Union, it is still not formally certain that Brexit will", "referendum resulted Brexit. Therefore, any answer to such questions is speculation at best", "PhD students in the UK who are EU nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk) * [How would the", "will happen. * *Nobody* knows yet what will happen now that the referendum", "Some affected questions: * [Could Brexit negatively affect PhD students in the UK", "can answer them. I propose we close those questions, because: * Although the", "to Brexit, but I don't ask them because nobody can answer them. I", "nobody can answer them. I propose we close those questions, because: * Although", "affected questions: * [Could Brexit negatively affect PhD students in the UK who", "* [Could Brexit negatively affect PhD students in the UK who are EU", "giving false hopes/promises at worst. Some affected questions: * [Could Brexit negatively affect", "to leave the European Union, it is still not formally certain that Brexit", "certain that Brexit will happen. * *Nobody* knows yet what will happen now", "the European Union, it is still not formally certain that Brexit will happen.", "those questions, because: * Although the electorate voted to leave the European Union,", "that the referendum resulted Brexit. Therefore, any answer to such questions is speculation", "speculation at best and giving false hopes/promises at worst. Some affected questions: *", "on this site. I have lots of questions related to Brexit, but I", "EU nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk) * [How would the UK leaving the EU affect academia and", "is still not formally certain that Brexit will happen. * *Nobody* knows yet", "Therefore, any answer to such questions is speculation at best and giving false", "any answer to such questions is speculation at best and giving false hopes/promises", "electorate voted to leave the European Union, it is still not formally certain", "ask them because nobody can answer them. I propose we close those questions,", "yet what will happen now that the referendum resulted Brexit. Therefore, any answer", "is speculation at best and giving false hopes/promises at worst. Some affected questions:", "students in the UK who are EU nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk) * [How would the UK", "affect PhD students in the UK who are EU nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk) * [How would", "[Could Brexit negatively affect PhD students in the UK who are EU nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk)", "to Brexit on this site. I have lots of questions related to Brexit,", "questions, because: * Although the electorate voted to leave the European Union, it", "are EU nationals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/71304/could-brexit-affect-negatively-phd-students-in-uk) * [How would the UK leaving the EU affect academia", "them. I propose we close those questions, because: * Although the electorate voted", "this site. I have lots of questions related to Brexit, but I don't", "*Nobody* knows yet what will happen now that the referendum resulted Brexit. Therefore,", "the electorate voted to leave the European Union, it is still not formally" ]
[ "mostly interested in the United States and the field of computer science, but", "studies on a specific question. Since no close voter left a comment regarding", "some studies on a specific question. Since no close voter left a comment", "United States and the field of computer science, but curious about other countries", "got closed as too broad. It simply asks for some studies on a", "specific question. Since no close voter left a comment regarding the \"too broad\"", "--- [Research studies covering the reasons why faculty applicants accept or reject academic", "and the field of computer science, but curious about other countries and fields", "quantify the reasons why faculty applicants accepted or rejected academic jobs that have", "there any research/study/survey that tried to quantify the reasons why faculty applicants accepted", "computer science, but curious about other countries and fields as well. > >", "applicants accept or reject academic jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452) > > Is there any research/study/survey that", "about other countries and fields as well. > > > [![enter image description", "what the following question got closed as too broad. It simply asks for", "broad\" issue, I am asking here. --- [Research studies covering the reasons why", "that tried to quantify the reasons why faculty applicants accepted or rejected academic", "comment regarding the \"too broad\" issue, I am asking here. --- [Research studies", "jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452) > > Is there any research/study/survey that tried to quantify the reasons", "simply asks for some studies on a specific question. Since no close voter", "asks for some studies on a specific question. Since no close voter left", "why faculty applicants accepted or rejected academic jobs that have been proposed to", "interested in the United States and the field of computer science, but curious", "covering the reasons why faculty applicants accept or reject academic jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452) > >", "other countries and fields as well. > > > [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/SvRBA.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/SvRBA.png)", "faculty applicants accepted or rejected academic jobs that have been proposed to them?", "current faculty, college ranking) > > > I am mostly interested in the", "have been proposed to them? (e.g., location, salary, the current faculty, college ranking)", "or rejected academic jobs that have been proposed to them? (e.g., location, salary,", "the United States and the field of computer science, but curious about other", "a specific question. Since no close voter left a comment regarding the \"too", "location, salary, the current faculty, college ranking) > > > I am mostly", "accept or reject academic jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452) > > Is there any research/study/survey that tried", "I am asking here. --- [Research studies covering the reasons why faculty applicants", "> I am mostly interested in the United States and the field of", "\"too broad\" issue, I am asking here. --- [Research studies covering the reasons", "faculty applicants accept or reject academic jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452) > > Is there any research/study/survey", "jobs that have been proposed to them? (e.g., location, salary, the current faculty,", "but curious about other countries and fields as well. > > > [![enter", "(e.g., location, salary, the current faculty, college ranking) > > > I am", "the following question got closed as too broad. It simply asks for some", "of computer science, but curious about other countries and fields as well. >", "science, but curious about other countries and fields as well. > > >", "States and the field of computer science, but curious about other countries and", "salary, the current faculty, college ranking) > > > I am mostly interested", "academic jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452) > > Is there any research/study/survey that tried to quantify the", "following question got closed as too broad. It simply asks for some studies", "field of computer science, but curious about other countries and fields as well.", "here. --- [Research studies covering the reasons why faculty applicants accept or reject", "too broad. It simply asks for some studies on a specific question. Since", "close voter left a comment regarding the \"too broad\" issue, I am asking", "don't understand what the following question got closed as too broad. It simply", "> Is there any research/study/survey that tried to quantify the reasons why faculty", "been proposed to them? (e.g., location, salary, the current faculty, college ranking) >", "rejected academic jobs that have been proposed to them? (e.g., location, salary, the", "reasons why faculty applicants accepted or rejected academic jobs that have been proposed", "no close voter left a comment regarding the \"too broad\" issue, I am", "accepted or rejected academic jobs that have been proposed to them? (e.g., location,", "studies covering the reasons why faculty applicants accept or reject academic jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452) >", "issue, I am asking here. --- [Research studies covering the reasons why faculty", "reasons why faculty applicants accept or reject academic jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452) > > Is there", "> > I am mostly interested in the United States and the field", "asking here. --- [Research studies covering the reasons why faculty applicants accept or", "broad. It simply asks for some studies on a specific question. Since no", "I don't understand what the following question got closed as too broad. It", "any research/study/survey that tried to quantify the reasons why faculty applicants accepted or", "the reasons why faculty applicants accepted or rejected academic jobs that have been", "college ranking) > > > I am mostly interested in the United States", "in the United States and the field of computer science, but curious about", "voter left a comment regarding the \"too broad\" issue, I am asking here.", "closed as too broad. It simply asks for some studies on a specific", "proposed to them? (e.g., location, salary, the current faculty, college ranking) > >", "faculty, college ranking) > > > I am mostly interested in the United", "the current faculty, college ranking) > > > I am mostly interested in", "applicants accepted or rejected academic jobs that have been proposed to them? (e.g.,", "> > Is there any research/study/survey that tried to quantify the reasons why", "ranking) > > > I am mostly interested in the United States and", "them? (e.g., location, salary, the current faculty, college ranking) > > > I", "Is there any research/study/survey that tried to quantify the reasons why faculty applicants", "to quantify the reasons why faculty applicants accepted or rejected academic jobs that", "tried to quantify the reasons why faculty applicants accepted or rejected academic jobs", "that have been proposed to them? (e.g., location, salary, the current faculty, college", "curious about other countries and fields as well. > > > [![enter image", "on a specific question. Since no close voter left a comment regarding the", "the field of computer science, but curious about other countries and fields as", "as too broad. It simply asks for some studies on a specific question.", "research/study/survey that tried to quantify the reasons why faculty applicants accepted or rejected", "to them? (e.g., location, salary, the current faculty, college ranking) > > >", "a comment regarding the \"too broad\" issue, I am asking here. --- [Research", "the \"too broad\" issue, I am asking here. --- [Research studies covering the", "reject academic jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452) > > Is there any research/study/survey that tried to quantify", "academic jobs that have been proposed to them? (e.g., location, salary, the current", "regarding the \"too broad\" issue, I am asking here. --- [Research studies covering", "question got closed as too broad. It simply asks for some studies on", "for some studies on a specific question. Since no close voter left a", "am asking here. --- [Research studies covering the reasons why faculty applicants accept", "Since no close voter left a comment regarding the \"too broad\" issue, I", "or reject academic jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452) > > Is there any research/study/survey that tried to", "left a comment regarding the \"too broad\" issue, I am asking here. ---", "> > > I am mostly interested in the United States and the", "understand what the following question got closed as too broad. It simply asks", "why faculty applicants accept or reject academic jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452) > > Is there any", "the reasons why faculty applicants accept or reject academic jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452) > > Is", "am mostly interested in the United States and the field of computer science,", "I am mostly interested in the United States and the field of computer", "It simply asks for some studies on a specific question. Since no close", "question. Since no close voter left a comment regarding the \"too broad\" issue,", "[Research studies covering the reasons why faculty applicants accept or reject academic jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/72300/452)" ]
[ "duplicate, should the member delete the answer in the duplicate question and relocate", "about copyright infringement. * Question 2 is specifically about a specific action, authors", "Question 1 is much more generally about publishing online (author's website, but also", "sue researchers for copyright infringement for putting their articles on a personal website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t)", "copyright infringement for putting their articles on a personal website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t) I believe we", "of situation arises. My Question: If an answer is located within a 'closed'", "in the duplicate question and relocate the answer (perhaps modified) in the first", "putting their articles on a personal website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t) I believe we can reopen the", "* Question 2 is specifically about a specific action, authors being sued for", "website, while Question 1 is much more generally about publishing online (author's website,", "online (author's website, but also online repositories such as academia.edu, researchgate and ArXiv.org)", "focused when this type of situation arises. My Question: If an answer is", "we can reopen the first question for the following reasons: * Question 1", "such as academia.edu, researchgate and ArXiv.org) I believe for these reasons, Question 1", "Question 1 should be re-opened and my question is now focused when this", "as academia.edu, researchgate and ArXiv.org) I believe for these reasons, Question 1 should", "publisher policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie) which was closed for being a duplicate of this question: ['How", "asks specifically about copyright infringement. * Question 2 is specifically about a specific", "these reasons, Question 1 should be re-opened and my question is now focused", "articles on a personal website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t) I believe we can reopen the first question", "about publishing online (author's website, but also online repositories such as academia.edu, researchgate", "website, but also online repositories such as academia.edu, researchgate and ArXiv.org) I believe", "this question ['Consequences for publishing final version PDF, in violation of publisher policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie)", "question is now focused when this type of situation arises. My Question: If", "being a duplicate, should the member delete the answer in the duplicate question", "ArXiv.org) I believe for these reasons, Question 1 should be re-opened and my", "for the following reasons: * Question 1 asks a more general question while", "a duplicate, should the member delete the answer in the duplicate question and", "within a 'closed' question for being a duplicate, should the member delete the", "answer in the duplicate question and relocate the answer (perhaps modified) in the", "provided an answer to this question ['Consequences for publishing final version PDF, in", "situation arises. My Question: If an answer is located within a 'closed' question", "an answer is located within a 'closed' question for being a duplicate, should", "violation of publisher policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie) which was closed for being a duplicate of this", "specific action, authors being sued for copyright infringement, while question 1 is much", "is now focused when this type of situation arises. My Question: If an", "for being a duplicate of this question: ['How often do publishers sue researchers", "for putting their articles on a personal website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t) I believe we can reopen", "['How often do publishers sue researchers for copyright infringement for putting their articles", "Author's personal website, while Question 1 is much more generally about publishing online", "but also online repositories such as academia.edu, researchgate and ArXiv.org) I believe for", "while question 1 is much more general * Question 2 is about publishing", "generally about publishing online (author's website, but also online repositories such as academia.edu,", "type of situation arises. My Question: If an answer is located within a", "which was closed for being a duplicate of this question: ['How often do", "copyright infringement, while question 1 is much more general * Question 2 is", "policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie) which was closed for being a duplicate of this question: ['How often", "question while Question 2 asks specifically about copyright infringement. * Question 2 is", "'closed' question for being a duplicate, should the member delete the answer in", "publishing online (author's website, but also online repositories such as academia.edu, researchgate and", "2 asks specifically about copyright infringement. * Question 2 is specifically about a", "for being a duplicate, should the member delete the answer in the duplicate", "duplicate of this question: ['How often do publishers sue researchers for copyright infringement", "a 'closed' question for being a duplicate, should the member delete the answer", "answer is located within a 'closed' question for being a duplicate, should the", "personal website, while Question 1 is much more generally about publishing online (author's", "website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t) I believe we can reopen the first question for the following reasons:", "I provided an answer to this question ['Consequences for publishing final version PDF,", "specifically on Author's personal website, while Question 1 is much more generally about", "do publishers sue researchers for copyright infringement for putting their articles on a", "question for being a duplicate, should the member delete the answer in the", "closed for being a duplicate of this question: ['How often do publishers sue", "more general question while Question 2 asks specifically about copyright infringement. * Question", "Question 2 is about publishing specifically on Author's personal website, while Question 1", "this question: ['How often do publishers sue researchers for copyright infringement for putting", "and my question is now focused when this type of situation arises. My", "can reopen the first question for the following reasons: * Question 1 asks", "often do publishers sue researchers for copyright infringement for putting their articles on", "repositories such as academia.edu, researchgate and ArXiv.org) I believe for these reasons, Question", "member delete the answer in the duplicate question and relocate the answer (perhaps", "publishing final version PDF, in violation of publisher policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie) which was closed for", "reasons, Question 1 should be re-opened and my question is now focused when", "infringement, while question 1 is much more general * Question 2 is about", "* Question 1 asks a more general question while Question 2 asks specifically", "the answer in the duplicate question and relocate the answer (perhaps modified) in", "My Question: If an answer is located within a 'closed' question for being", "this type of situation arises. My Question: If an answer is located within", "(author's website, but also online repositories such as academia.edu, researchgate and ArXiv.org) I", "on a personal website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t) I believe we can reopen the first question for", "publishing specifically on Author's personal website, while Question 1 is much more generally", "the first question for the following reasons: * Question 1 asks a more", "is located within a 'closed' question for being a duplicate, should the member", "question ['Consequences for publishing final version PDF, in violation of publisher policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie) which", "is much more generally about publishing online (author's website, but also online repositories", "I believe for these reasons, Question 1 should be re-opened and my question", "If an answer is located within a 'closed' question for being a duplicate,", "the following reasons: * Question 1 asks a more general question while Question", "on Author's personal website, while Question 1 is much more generally about publishing", "copyright infringement. * Question 2 is specifically about a specific action, authors being", "believe for these reasons, Question 1 should be re-opened and my question is", "for copyright infringement, while question 1 is much more general * Question 2", "for these reasons, Question 1 should be re-opened and my question is now", "specifically about a specific action, authors being sued for copyright infringement, while question", "arises. My Question: If an answer is located within a 'closed' question for", "re-opened and my question is now focused when this type of situation arises.", "question 1 is much more general * Question 2 is about publishing specifically", "version PDF, in violation of publisher policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie) which was closed for being a", "to this question ['Consequences for publishing final version PDF, in violation of publisher", "1 asks a more general question while Question 2 asks specifically about copyright", "being a duplicate of this question: ['How often do publishers sue researchers for", "believe we can reopen the first question for the following reasons: * Question", "is specifically about a specific action, authors being sued for copyright infringement, while", "specifically about copyright infringement. * Question 2 is specifically about a specific action,", "infringement for putting their articles on a personal website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t) I believe we can", "a duplicate of this question: ['How often do publishers sue researchers for copyright", "* Question 2 is about publishing specifically on Author's personal website, while Question", "while Question 2 asks specifically about copyright infringement. * Question 2 is specifically", "answer to this question ['Consequences for publishing final version PDF, in violation of", "for publishing final version PDF, in violation of publisher policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie) which was closed", "online repositories such as academia.edu, researchgate and ArXiv.org) I believe for these reasons,", "general * Question 2 is about publishing specifically on Author's personal website, while", "question: ['How often do publishers sue researchers for copyright infringement for putting their", "reopen the first question for the following reasons: * Question 1 asks a", "delete the answer in the duplicate question and relocate the answer (perhaps modified)", "academia.edu, researchgate and ArXiv.org) I believe for these reasons, Question 1 should be", "Question 2 asks specifically about copyright infringement. * Question 2 is specifically about", "1 should be re-opened and my question is now focused when this type", "more general * Question 2 is about publishing specifically on Author's personal website,", "the duplicate question and relocate the answer (perhaps modified) in the first accepted", "researchers for copyright infringement for putting their articles on a personal website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t) I", "personal website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t) I believe we can reopen the first question for the following", "reasons: * Question 1 asks a more general question while Question 2 asks", "is about publishing specifically on Author's personal website, while Question 1 is much", "much more generally about publishing online (author's website, but also online repositories such", "authors being sued for copyright infringement, while question 1 is much more general", "now focused when this type of situation arises. My Question: If an answer", "of publisher policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie) which was closed for being a duplicate of this question:", "the member delete the answer in the duplicate question and relocate the answer", "researchgate and ArXiv.org) I believe for these reasons, Question 1 should be re-opened", "['Consequences for publishing final version PDF, in violation of publisher policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie) which was", "PDF, in violation of publisher policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie) which was closed for being a duplicate", "2 is about publishing specifically on Author's personal website, while Question 1 is", "Question 2 is specifically about a specific action, authors being sued for copyright", "sued for copyright infringement, while question 1 is much more general * Question", "while Question 1 is much more generally about publishing online (author's website, but", "for copyright infringement for putting their articles on a personal website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t) I believe", "I believe we can reopen the first question for the following reasons: *", "also online repositories such as academia.edu, researchgate and ArXiv.org) I believe for these", "being sued for copyright infringement, while question 1 is much more general *", "in violation of publisher policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie) which was closed for being a duplicate of", "about a specific action, authors being sued for copyright infringement, while question 1", "1 is much more general * Question 2 is about publishing specifically on", "be re-opened and my question is now focused when this type of situation", "question for the following reasons: * Question 1 asks a more general question", "Question 1 asks a more general question while Question 2 asks specifically about", "my question is now focused when this type of situation arises. My Question:", "general question while Question 2 asks specifically about copyright infringement. * Question 2", "asks a more general question while Question 2 asks specifically about copyright infringement.", "a more general question while Question 2 asks specifically about copyright infringement. *", "Question: If an answer is located within a 'closed' question for being a", "a specific action, authors being sued for copyright infringement, while question 1 is", "an answer to this question ['Consequences for publishing final version PDF, in violation", "following reasons: * Question 1 asks a more general question while Question 2", "should the member delete the answer in the duplicate question and relocate the", "infringement. * Question 2 is specifically about a specific action, authors being sued", "located within a 'closed' question for being a duplicate, should the member delete", "final version PDF, in violation of publisher policies?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72321/consequences-for-publishing-final-version-pdf-in-violation-of-publisher-policie) which was closed for being", "and ArXiv.org) I believe for these reasons, Question 1 should be re-opened and", "1 is much more generally about publishing online (author's website, but also online", "more generally about publishing online (author's website, but also online repositories such as", "was closed for being a duplicate of this question: ['How often do publishers", "first question for the following reasons: * Question 1 asks a more general", "is much more general * Question 2 is about publishing specifically on Author's", "2 is specifically about a specific action, authors being sued for copyright infringement,", "publishers sue researchers for copyright infringement for putting their articles on a personal", "should be re-opened and my question is now focused when this type of", "of this question: ['How often do publishers sue researchers for copyright infringement for", "their articles on a personal website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t) I believe we can reopen the first", "action, authors being sued for copyright infringement, while question 1 is much more", "much more general * Question 2 is about publishing specifically on Author's personal", "when this type of situation arises. My Question: If an answer is located", "a personal website?'](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/51941/how-often-do-publishers-sue-researchers-for-copyright-infringement-for-putting-t) I believe we can reopen the first question for the", "duplicate question and relocate the answer (perhaps modified) in the first accepted question?", "about publishing specifically on Author's personal website, while Question 1 is much more" ]
[ "can vote on them individually. This way we can measure (to some degree)", "measure (to some degree) how strongly the community feels about each of these.*", "for users who have just discovered the edit capability? What makes a \"good", "that people can vote on them individually. This way we can measure (to", "do you have for users who have just discovered the edit capability? What", "individually. This way we can measure (to some degree) how strongly the community", "so that people can vote on them individually. This way we can measure", "What advice do you have for users who have just discovered the edit", "just discovered the edit capability? What makes a \"good edit\" on Academia.SE? *Note:", "edit capability? What makes a \"good edit\" on Academia.SE? *Note: I have made", "you have for users who have just discovered the edit capability? What makes", "Academia.SE? *Note: I have made one suggestion per answer, so that people can", "one suggestion per answer, so that people can vote on them individually. This", "suggestion per answer, so that people can vote on them individually. This way", "I have made one suggestion per answer, so that people can vote on", "This way we can measure (to some degree) how strongly the community feels", "have made one suggestion per answer, so that people can vote on them", "who have just discovered the edit capability? What makes a \"good edit\" on", "them individually. This way we can measure (to some degree) how strongly the", "have just discovered the edit capability? What makes a \"good edit\" on Academia.SE?", "What makes a \"good edit\" on Academia.SE? *Note: I have made one suggestion", "\"good edit\" on Academia.SE? *Note: I have made one suggestion per answer, so", "way we can measure (to some degree) how strongly the community feels about", "have for users who have just discovered the edit capability? What makes a", "the edit capability? What makes a \"good edit\" on Academia.SE? *Note: I have", "made one suggestion per answer, so that people can vote on them individually.", "answer, so that people can vote on them individually. This way we can", "on them individually. This way we can measure (to some degree) how strongly", "vote on them individually. This way we can measure (to some degree) how", "people can vote on them individually. This way we can measure (to some", "discovered the edit capability? What makes a \"good edit\" on Academia.SE? *Note: I", "we can measure (to some degree) how strongly the community feels about each", "makes a \"good edit\" on Academia.SE? *Note: I have made one suggestion per", "edit\" on Academia.SE? *Note: I have made one suggestion per answer, so that", "per answer, so that people can vote on them individually. This way we", "users who have just discovered the edit capability? What makes a \"good edit\"", "on Academia.SE? *Note: I have made one suggestion per answer, so that people", "a \"good edit\" on Academia.SE? *Note: I have made one suggestion per answer,", "can measure (to some degree) how strongly the community feels about each of", "*Note: I have made one suggestion per answer, so that people can vote", "capability? What makes a \"good edit\" on Academia.SE? *Note: I have made one", "advice do you have for users who have just discovered the edit capability?" ]
[ "To put it otherwise, are MOOCs regarded as part of academia by this", "it otherwise, are MOOCs regarded as part of academia by this Stack Exchange", "What is our stance on questions asking about MOOCs? Are they on-topic or", "Stack Exchange community? (or do you prefer to wait a few years before?)", "academia by this Stack Exchange community? (or do you prefer to wait a", "otherwise, are MOOCs regarded as part of academia by this Stack Exchange community?", "part of academia by this Stack Exchange community? (or do you prefer to", "regarded as part of academia by this Stack Exchange community? (or do you", "put it otherwise, are MOOCs regarded as part of academia by this Stack", "our stance on questions asking about MOOCs? Are they on-topic or off-topic? To", "on-topic or off-topic? To put it otherwise, are MOOCs regarded as part of", "asking about MOOCs? Are they on-topic or off-topic? To put it otherwise, are", "Are they on-topic or off-topic? To put it otherwise, are MOOCs regarded as", "by this Stack Exchange community? (or do you prefer to wait a few", "about MOOCs? Are they on-topic or off-topic? To put it otherwise, are MOOCs", "MOOCs? Are they on-topic or off-topic? To put it otherwise, are MOOCs regarded", "of academia by this Stack Exchange community? (or do you prefer to wait", "off-topic? To put it otherwise, are MOOCs regarded as part of academia by", "as part of academia by this Stack Exchange community? (or do you prefer", "MOOCs regarded as part of academia by this Stack Exchange community? (or do", "is our stance on questions asking about MOOCs? Are they on-topic or off-topic?", "or off-topic? To put it otherwise, are MOOCs regarded as part of academia", "are MOOCs regarded as part of academia by this Stack Exchange community? (or", "they on-topic or off-topic? To put it otherwise, are MOOCs regarded as part", "on questions asking about MOOCs? Are they on-topic or off-topic? To put it", "this Stack Exchange community? (or do you prefer to wait a few years", "questions asking about MOOCs? Are they on-topic or off-topic? To put it otherwise,", "stance on questions asking about MOOCs? Are they on-topic or off-topic? To put" ]
[ "the Black Lives Matter protesters, be removed? Here's the link: [Is it appropriate", "to make a pun that references a highly charged topic in current events,", "references a highly charged topic in current events, in a lecture on an", "the link: [Is it appropriate to make a pun that references a highly", "Lives Matter protesters, be removed? Here's the link: [Is it appropriate to make", "appropriate to make a pun that references a highly charged topic in current", "question, which mocks the Black Lives Matter protesters, be removed? Here's the link:", "a highly charged topic in current events, in a lecture on an unrelated", "mocks the Black Lives Matter protesters, be removed? Here's the link: [Is it", "which mocks the Black Lives Matter protesters, be removed? Here's the link: [Is", "protesters, be removed? Here's the link: [Is it appropriate to make a pun", "Nodes Matter\" question, which mocks the Black Lives Matter protesters, be removed? Here's", "Here's the link: [Is it appropriate to make a pun that references a", "Should the \"Black Nodes Matter\" question, which mocks the Black Lives Matter protesters,", "Matter\" question, which mocks the Black Lives Matter protesters, be removed? Here's the", "a pun that references a highly charged topic in current events, in a", "link: [Is it appropriate to make a pun that references a highly charged", "removed? Here's the link: [Is it appropriate to make a pun that references", "it appropriate to make a pun that references a highly charged topic in", "highly charged topic in current events, in a lecture on an unrelated subject?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72764/when-discussing-red-black-trees-in-lecture-is-it-appropriate-to-use-the-phrase)", "Matter protesters, be removed? Here's the link: [Is it appropriate to make a", "pun that references a highly charged topic in current events, in a lecture", "the \"Black Nodes Matter\" question, which mocks the Black Lives Matter protesters, be", "be removed? Here's the link: [Is it appropriate to make a pun that", "that references a highly charged topic in current events, in a lecture on", "Black Lives Matter protesters, be removed? Here's the link: [Is it appropriate to", "\"Black Nodes Matter\" question, which mocks the Black Lives Matter protesters, be removed?", "[Is it appropriate to make a pun that references a highly charged topic", "make a pun that references a highly charged topic in current events, in" ]
[ "would explain the high number of articles about \"offensive\" and \"appropriate\" in the", "returned 539 results. \"Appropriate\" returned 2,397 results. \"New research\" was behind \"appropritate\" by", "My bad - this would explain the high number of articles about \"offensive\"", "tends to repress and stifle the free exchange of learning and ideas? If", "2,397 results. \"New research\" was behind \"appropritate\" by 3 questions. Have education and", "for this apparent unbalance in discussions among academics? [![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif) **EDIT** *A commenter pointed", "and \"appropriate\" in the image, since the question I was looking at contained", "just now I saw 3 of the 6 \"hot topics\" were about \"appropriateness\"", "search in this site for questions containing \"methodologies\" returned 539 results. \"Appropriate\" returned", "*A commenter pointed out that the screen shot was of \"related questions\" not", "by 3 questions. Have education and academics taken second place to something that", "of this page, just now I saw 3 of the 6 \"hot topics\"", "of learning and ideas? If so, how to restore free exchange? If not,", "questions\" not of \"hot network questions\". My bad - this would explain the", "exchange of learning and ideas? If so, how to restore free exchange? If", "and ideas? If so, how to restore free exchange? If not, what is", "research\" was behind \"appropritate\" by 3 questions. Have education and academics taken second", "explain the high number of articles about \"offensive\" and \"appropriate\" in the image,", "\"Appropriate\" returned 2,397 results. \"New research\" was behind \"appropritate\" by 3 questions. Have", "\"appropriate\" in the image, since the question I was looking at contained this", "results. \"Appropriate\" returned 2,397 results. \"New research\" was behind \"appropritate\" by 3 questions.", "that tends to repress and stifle the free exchange of learning and ideas?", "and stifle the free exchange of learning and ideas? If so, how to", "unbalance in discussions among academics? [![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif) **EDIT** *A commenter pointed out that the", "539 results. \"Appropriate\" returned 2,397 results. \"New research\" was behind \"appropritate\" by 3", "returned 2,397 results. \"New research\" was behind \"appropritate\" by 3 questions. Have education", "the sidebar of this page, just now I saw 3 of the 6", "in discussions among academics? [![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif) **EDIT** *A commenter pointed out that the screen", "\"appropritate\" by 3 questions. Have education and academics taken second place to something", "in this site for questions containing \"methodologies\" returned 539 results. \"Appropriate\" returned 2,397", "taken second place to something that tends to repress and stifle the free", "questions\". My bad - this would explain the high number of articles about", "bad - this would explain the high number of articles about \"offensive\" and", "site for questions containing \"methodologies\" returned 539 results. \"Appropriate\" returned 2,397 results. \"New", "the explanation for this apparent unbalance in discussions among academics? [![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif) **EDIT** *A", "place to something that tends to repress and stifle the free exchange of", "of \"hot network questions\". My bad - this would explain the high number", "about \"offensive\" and \"appropriate\" in the image, since the question I was looking", "On the sidebar of this page, just now I saw 3 of the", "shot was of \"related questions\" not of \"hot network questions\". My bad -", "results. \"New research\" was behind \"appropritate\" by 3 questions. Have education and academics", "- this would explain the high number of articles about \"offensive\" and \"appropriate\"", "out that the screen shot was of \"related questions\" not of \"hot network", "commenter pointed out that the screen shot was of \"related questions\" not of", "the screen shot was of \"related questions\" not of \"hot network questions\". My", "now I saw 3 of the 6 \"hot topics\" were about \"appropriateness\" or", "**EDIT** *A commenter pointed out that the screen shot was of \"related questions\"", "was behind \"appropritate\" by 3 questions. Have education and academics taken second place", "6 \"hot topics\" were about \"appropriateness\" or \"offensiveness\" (image attached). A search in", "\"related questions\" not of \"hot network questions\". My bad - this would explain", "explanation for this apparent unbalance in discussions among academics? [![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif) **EDIT** *A commenter", "\"offensive\" and \"appropriate\" in the image, since the question I was looking at", "the 6 \"hot topics\" were about \"appropriateness\" or \"offensiveness\" (image attached). A search", "(image attached). A search in this site for questions containing \"methodologies\" returned 539", "questions containing \"methodologies\" returned 539 results. \"Appropriate\" returned 2,397 results. \"New research\" was", "I saw 3 of the 6 \"hot topics\" were about \"appropriateness\" or \"offensiveness\"", "exchange? If not, what is the explanation for this apparent unbalance in discussions", "If not, what is the explanation for this apparent unbalance in discussions among", "free exchange of learning and ideas? If so, how to restore free exchange?", "to something that tends to repress and stifle the free exchange of learning", "\"hot topics\" were about \"appropriateness\" or \"offensiveness\" (image attached). A search in this", "was of \"related questions\" not of \"hot network questions\". My bad - this", "of the 6 \"hot topics\" were about \"appropriateness\" or \"offensiveness\" (image attached). A", "pointed out that the screen shot was of \"related questions\" not of \"hot", "\"appropriateness\" or \"offensiveness\" (image attached). A search in this site for questions containing", "ideas? If so, how to restore free exchange? If not, what is the", "Have education and academics taken second place to something that tends to repress", "this would explain the high number of articles about \"offensive\" and \"appropriate\" in", "of articles about \"offensive\" and \"appropriate\" in the image, since the question I", "not of \"hot network questions\". My bad - this would explain the high", "for questions containing \"methodologies\" returned 539 results. \"Appropriate\" returned 2,397 results. \"New research\"", "saw 3 of the 6 \"hot topics\" were about \"appropriateness\" or \"offensiveness\" (image", "is the explanation for this apparent unbalance in discussions among academics? [![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif) **EDIT**", "\"hot network questions\". My bad - this would explain the high number of", "articles about \"offensive\" and \"appropriate\" in the image, since the question I was", "and academics taken second place to something that tends to repress and stifle", "repress and stifle the free exchange of learning and ideas? If so, how", "that the screen shot was of \"related questions\" not of \"hot network questions\".", "free exchange? If not, what is the explanation for this apparent unbalance in", "not, what is the explanation for this apparent unbalance in discussions among academics?", "apparent unbalance in discussions among academics? [![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif) **EDIT** *A commenter pointed out that", "3 of the 6 \"hot topics\" were about \"appropriateness\" or \"offensiveness\" (image attached).", "the free exchange of learning and ideas? If so, how to restore free", "[![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif) **EDIT** *A commenter pointed out that the screen shot was of \"related", "among academics? [![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif) **EDIT** *A commenter pointed out that the screen shot was", "or \"offensiveness\" (image attached). A search in this site for questions containing \"methodologies\"", "second place to something that tends to repress and stifle the free exchange", "to repress and stifle the free exchange of learning and ideas? If so,", "something that tends to repress and stifle the free exchange of learning and", "\"New research\" was behind \"appropritate\" by 3 questions. Have education and academics taken", "behind \"appropritate\" by 3 questions. Have education and academics taken second place to", "high number of articles about \"offensive\" and \"appropriate\" in the image, since the", "A search in this site for questions containing \"methodologies\" returned 539 results. \"Appropriate\"", "\"methodologies\" returned 539 results. \"Appropriate\" returned 2,397 results. \"New research\" was behind \"appropritate\"", "network questions\". My bad - this would explain the high number of articles", "3 questions. Have education and academics taken second place to something that tends", "discussions among academics? [![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif) **EDIT** *A commenter pointed out that the screen shot", "academics? [![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif) **EDIT** *A commenter pointed out that the screen shot was of", "this page, just now I saw 3 of the 6 \"hot topics\" were", "containing \"methodologies\" returned 539 results. \"Appropriate\" returned 2,397 results. \"New research\" was behind", "were about \"appropriateness\" or \"offensiveness\" (image attached). A search in this site for", "of \"related questions\" not of \"hot network questions\". My bad - this would", "the high number of articles about \"offensive\" and \"appropriate\" in the image, since", "so, how to restore free exchange? If not, what is the explanation for", "topics\" were about \"appropriateness\" or \"offensiveness\" (image attached). A search in this site", "education and academics taken second place to something that tends to repress and", "to restore free exchange? If not, what is the explanation for this apparent", "page, just now I saw 3 of the 6 \"hot topics\" were about", "in the image, since the question I was looking at contained this vocabulary.*", "\"offensiveness\" (image attached). A search in this site for questions containing \"methodologies\" returned", "screen shot was of \"related questions\" not of \"hot network questions\". My bad", "questions. Have education and academics taken second place to something that tends to", "learning and ideas? If so, how to restore free exchange? If not, what", "what is the explanation for this apparent unbalance in discussions among academics? [![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)", "how to restore free exchange? If not, what is the explanation for this", "about \"appropriateness\" or \"offensiveness\" (image attached). A search in this site for questions", "number of articles about \"offensive\" and \"appropriate\" in the image, since the question", "sidebar of this page, just now I saw 3 of the 6 \"hot", "attached). A search in this site for questions containing \"methodologies\" returned 539 results.", "this site for questions containing \"methodologies\" returned 539 results. \"Appropriate\" returned 2,397 results.", "stifle the free exchange of learning and ideas? If so, how to restore", "If so, how to restore free exchange? If not, what is the explanation", "restore free exchange? If not, what is the explanation for this apparent unbalance", "academics taken second place to something that tends to repress and stifle the", "this apparent unbalance in discussions among academics? [![education-vs-values](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/RPyyN.gif) **EDIT** *A commenter pointed out" ]
[ "question about the ethics of stealing coffee; I am interested specifically in the", "questions like this are not programming related. > > > in [What is", "I'm not 100% sure that this belongs on Academia Stack Exchange, but this", "stick \"for programmers\" on a question to make it programming related. > >", "eventually decided that all questions like this are not programming related. > >", "exist at the time) it was eventually decided that all questions like this", "> Note: I'm not 100% sure that this belongs on Academia Stack Exchange,", "The fundamental rule is you can't just stick \"for programmers\" on a question", "100% sure that this belongs on Academia Stack Exchange, but this is not", "is not a question about the ethics of stealing coffee; I am interested", "a programmer?\", \"What is the best movie for programmers?\") After a long debate", "you can't just stick \"for programmers\" on a question to make it programming", "question: [What are the social norms associated with stealing free coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee) OP says:", "lot of questions that were, essentially, \"What is as a good such-and-such for", "related. > > > At the time, SO had a lot of questions", "SO blog (since Meta didn't exist at the time) it was eventually decided", "The question in question: [What are the social norms associated with stealing free", "on a question to make it programming related. > > > At the", "a good such-and-such for programmers?\" (e.g. \"What is your favourite food, as a", "ethics of stealing coffee; I am interested specifically in the attitudes of academics", "not a question about the ethics of stealing coffee; I am interested specifically", "stealing free food. > > > To me this question seemed off-topic and", "such-and-such for programmers?\" (e.g. \"What is your favourite food, as a programmer?\", \"What", "Meta didn't exist at the time) it was eventually decided that all questions", "make it programming related. > > > At the time, SO had a", "are not programming related. > > > in [What is the boat programming", "programmers\" on a question to make it programming related. > > > At", "the best movie for programmers?\") After a long debate on the SO blog", "is your favourite food, as a programmer?\", \"What is the best movie for", "\"*What are the attitudes of academics towards X?*\" question on or off -topic?", "free food. > > > To me this question seemed off-topic and I", "as per > > The fundamental rule is you can't just stick \"for", "associated with stealing free coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee) OP says: > > Note: I'm not 100%", "off -topic? The question in question: [What are the social norms associated with", "SO had a lot of questions that were, essentially, \"What is as a", "After a long debate on the SO blog (since Meta didn't exist at", "programming related. > > > in [What is the boat programming meme about?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about)", "the attitudes of academics towards X?*\" question on or off -topic? The question", "all questions like this are not programming related. > > > in [What", "this are not programming related. > > > in [What is the boat", "a \"*What are the attitudes of academics towards X?*\" question on or off", "coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee) OP says: > > Note: I'm not 100% sure that this belongs", "are the attitudes of academics towards X?*\" question on or off -topic? The", "the time, SO had a lot of questions that were, essentially, \"What is", "programmers?\") After a long debate on the SO blog (since Meta didn't exist", "towards stealing free food. > > > To me this question seemed off-topic", "at the time) it was eventually decided that all questions like this are", "your favourite food, as a programmer?\", \"What is the best movie for programmers?\")", "that all questions like this are not programming related. > > > in", "fundamental rule is you can't just stick \"for programmers\" on a question to", "food, as a programmer?\", \"What is the best movie for programmers?\") After a", "is the best movie for programmers?\") After a long debate on the SO", "I flagged it as such, as per > > The fundamental rule is", "academics towards X?*\" question on or off -topic? The question in question: [What", "To me this question seemed off-topic and I flagged it as such, as", "essentially, \"What is as a good such-and-such for programmers?\" (e.g. \"What is your", "decided that all questions like this are not programming related. > > >", "is you can't just stick \"for programmers\" on a question to make it", "not programming related. > > > in [What is the boat programming meme", "attitudes of academics towards X?*\" question on or off -topic? The question in", "had a lot of questions that were, essentially, \"What is as a good", "norms associated with stealing free coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee) OP says: > > Note: I'm not", "the social norms associated with stealing free coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee) OP says: > > Note:", "> At the time, SO had a lot of questions that were, essentially,", "Is a \"*What are the attitudes of academics towards X?*\" question on or", "towards X?*\" question on or off -topic? The question in question: [What are", "for programmers?\" (e.g. \"What is your favourite food, as a programmer?\", \"What is", "it programming related. > > > At the time, SO had a lot", "didn't exist at the time) it was eventually decided that all questions like", "coffee; I am interested specifically in the attitudes of academics towards stealing free", "a long debate on the SO blog (since Meta didn't exist at the", "programmer?\", \"What is the best movie for programmers?\") After a long debate on", "programmers?\" (e.g. \"What is your favourite food, as a programmer?\", \"What is the", "a question about the ethics of stealing coffee; I am interested specifically in", "movie for programmers?\") After a long debate on the SO blog (since Meta", "the ethics of stealing coffee; I am interested specifically in the attitudes of", "rule is you can't just stick \"for programmers\" on a question to make", "(e.g. \"What is your favourite food, as a programmer?\", \"What is the best", "\"What is your favourite food, as a programmer?\", \"What is the best movie", "are the social norms associated with stealing free coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee) OP says: > >", "off-topic and I flagged it as such, as per > > The fundamental", "Exchange, but this is not a question about the ethics of stealing coffee;", "related. > > > in [What is the boat programming meme about?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about) but", "on Academia Stack Exchange, but this is not a question about the ethics", "X?*\" question on or off -topic? The question in question: [What are the", "questions that were, essentially, \"What is as a good such-and-such for programmers?\" (e.g.", "attitudes of academics towards stealing free food. > > > To me this", "-topic? The question in question: [What are the social norms associated with stealing", "can't just stick \"for programmers\" on a question to make it programming related.", "that this belongs on Academia Stack Exchange, but this is not a question", "> > At the time, SO had a lot of questions that were,", "\"What is the best movie for programmers?\") After a long debate on the", "this belongs on Academia Stack Exchange, but this is not a question about", "stealing coffee; I am interested specifically in the attitudes of academics towards stealing", "the SO blog (since Meta didn't exist at the time) it was eventually", "\"What is as a good such-and-such for programmers?\" (e.g. \"What is your favourite", "At the time, SO had a lot of questions that were, essentially, \"What", "> > in [What is the boat programming meme about?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about) but what do", "> > Note: I'm not 100% sure that this belongs on Academia Stack", "of questions that were, essentially, \"What is as a good such-and-such for programmers?\"", "were, essentially, \"What is as a good such-and-such for programmers?\" (e.g. \"What is", "it as such, as per > > The fundamental rule is you can't", "of academics towards stealing free food. > > > To me this question", "question in question: [What are the social norms associated with stealing free coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee)", "> > > in [What is the boat programming meme about?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about) but what", "question seemed off-topic and I flagged it as such, as per > >", "in the attitudes of academics towards stealing free food. > > > To", "flagged it as such, as per > > The fundamental rule is you", "am interested specifically in the attitudes of academics towards stealing free food. >", "with stealing free coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee) OP says: > > Note: I'm not 100% sure", "> in [What is the boat programming meme about?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about) but what do others", "social norms associated with stealing free coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee) OP says: > > Note: I'm", "and I flagged it as such, as per > > The fundamental rule", "or off -topic? The question in question: [What are the social norms associated", "as a programmer?\", \"What is the best movie for programmers?\") After a long", "like this are not programming related. > > > in [What is the", "is as a good such-and-such for programmers?\" (e.g. \"What is your favourite food,", "to make it programming related. > > > At the time, SO had", "the time) it was eventually decided that all questions like this are not", "> > The fundamental rule is you can't just stick \"for programmers\" on", "a question to make it programming related. > > > At the time,", "long debate on the SO blog (since Meta didn't exist at the time)", "stealing free coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee) OP says: > > Note: I'm not 100% sure that", "belongs on Academia Stack Exchange, but this is not a question about the", "says: > > Note: I'm not 100% sure that this belongs on Academia", "I am interested specifically in the attitudes of academics towards stealing free food.", "OP says: > > Note: I'm not 100% sure that this belongs on", "Stack Exchange, but this is not a question about the ethics of stealing", "was eventually decided that all questions like this are not programming related. >", "programming related. > > > At the time, SO had a lot of", "seemed off-topic and I flagged it as such, as per > > The", "blog (since Meta didn't exist at the time) it was eventually decided that", "Academia Stack Exchange, but this is not a question about the ethics of", "> > To me this question seemed off-topic and I flagged it as", "best movie for programmers?\") After a long debate on the SO blog (since", "as such, as per > > The fundamental rule is you can't just", "sure that this belongs on Academia Stack Exchange, but this is not a", "as a good such-and-such for programmers?\" (e.g. \"What is your favourite food, as", "on or off -topic? The question in question: [What are the social norms", "that were, essentially, \"What is as a good such-and-such for programmers?\" (e.g. \"What", "a lot of questions that were, essentially, \"What is as a good such-and-such", "in [What is the boat programming meme about?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/14470/what-is-the-boat-programming-meme-about) but what do others think?", "> > > To me this question seemed off-topic and I flagged it", "[What are the social norms associated with stealing free coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee) OP says: >", "on the SO blog (since Meta didn't exist at the time) it was", "> To me this question seemed off-topic and I flagged it as such,", "question to make it programming related. > > > At the time, SO", "Note: I'm not 100% sure that this belongs on Academia Stack Exchange, but", "time) it was eventually decided that all questions like this are not programming", "for programmers?\") After a long debate on the SO blog (since Meta didn't", "free coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee) OP says: > > Note: I'm not 100% sure that this", "(since Meta didn't exist at the time) it was eventually decided that all", "about the ethics of stealing coffee; I am interested specifically in the attitudes", "food. > > > To me this question seemed off-topic and I flagged", "it was eventually decided that all questions like this are not programming related.", "> > > At the time, SO had a lot of questions that", "good such-and-such for programmers?\" (e.g. \"What is your favourite food, as a programmer?\",", "of academics towards X?*\" question on or off -topic? The question in question:", "interested specifically in the attitudes of academics towards stealing free food. > >", "the attitudes of academics towards stealing free food. > > > To me", "question on or off -topic? The question in question: [What are the social", "but this is not a question about the ethics of stealing coffee; I", "per > > The fundamental rule is you can't just stick \"for programmers\"", "just stick \"for programmers\" on a question to make it programming related. >", "such, as per > > The fundamental rule is you can't just stick", "time, SO had a lot of questions that were, essentially, \"What is as", "academics towards stealing free food. > > > To me this question seemed", "this is not a question about the ethics of stealing coffee; I am", "me this question seemed off-topic and I flagged it as such, as per", "not 100% sure that this belongs on Academia Stack Exchange, but this is", "specifically in the attitudes of academics towards stealing free food. > > >", "\"for programmers\" on a question to make it programming related. > > >", "> The fundamental rule is you can't just stick \"for programmers\" on a", "in question: [What are the social norms associated with stealing free coffee?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/73477/what-are-the-social-norms-associated-with-stealing-free-coffee) OP", "debate on the SO blog (since Meta didn't exist at the time) it", "this question seemed off-topic and I flagged it as such, as per >", "favourite food, as a programmer?\", \"What is the best movie for programmers?\") After", "of stealing coffee; I am interested specifically in the attitudes of academics towards" ]
[ "Recent example: [Publishing: quality vs. quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity) was tagged as duplicate. But it seems", "I'll keep this very short: I believe there is a tendency here to", "as \"duplication\". This seems to harm the intention of this site and is", "a very substantive way. Recent example: [Publishing: quality vs. quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity) was tagged as", "overall unjustified. Questions that are \"similar\" can still vary in a very substantive", "to label every similarity between questions as \"duplication\". This seems to harm the", "to harm the intention of this site and is overall unjustified. Questions that", "are \"similar\" can still vary in a very substantive way. Recent example: [Publishing:", "very substantive way. Recent example: [Publishing: quality vs. quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity) was tagged as duplicate.", "\"duplication\". This seems to harm the intention of this site and is overall", "[Publishing: quality vs. quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity) was tagged as duplicate. But it seems to me", "label every similarity between questions as \"duplication\". This seems to harm the intention", "that are \"similar\" can still vary in a very substantive way. Recent example:", "seems to me as different than the alleged original. (See my comment there).", "\"similar\" can still vary in a very substantive way. Recent example: [Publishing: quality", "this very short: I believe there is a tendency here to label every", "here to label every similarity between questions as \"duplication\". This seems to harm", "tendency here to label every similarity between questions as \"duplication\". This seems to", "short: I believe there is a tendency here to label every similarity between", "vs. quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity) was tagged as duplicate. But it seems to me as different", "I believe there is a tendency here to label every similarity between questions", "site and is overall unjustified. Questions that are \"similar\" can still vary in", "still vary in a very substantive way. Recent example: [Publishing: quality vs. quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity)", "between questions as \"duplication\". This seems to harm the intention of this site", "was tagged as duplicate. But it seems to me as different than the", "intention of this site and is overall unjustified. Questions that are \"similar\" can", "very short: I believe there is a tendency here to label every similarity", "keep this very short: I believe there is a tendency here to label", "this site and is overall unjustified. Questions that are \"similar\" can still vary", "every similarity between questions as \"duplication\". This seems to harm the intention of", "unjustified. Questions that are \"similar\" can still vary in a very substantive way.", "the intention of this site and is overall unjustified. Questions that are \"similar\"", "Questions that are \"similar\" can still vary in a very substantive way. Recent", "as duplicate. But it seems to me as different than the alleged original.", "a tendency here to label every similarity between questions as \"duplication\". This seems", "vary in a very substantive way. Recent example: [Publishing: quality vs. quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity) was", "But it seems to me as different than the alleged original. (See my", "This seems to harm the intention of this site and is overall unjustified.", "similarity between questions as \"duplication\". This seems to harm the intention of this", "harm the intention of this site and is overall unjustified. Questions that are", "and is overall unjustified. Questions that are \"similar\" can still vary in a", "example: [Publishing: quality vs. quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity) was tagged as duplicate. But it seems to", "way. Recent example: [Publishing: quality vs. quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity) was tagged as duplicate. But it", "is a tendency here to label every similarity between questions as \"duplication\". This", "quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity) was tagged as duplicate. But it seems to me as different than", "questions as \"duplication\". This seems to harm the intention of this site and", "believe there is a tendency here to label every similarity between questions as", "there is a tendency here to label every similarity between questions as \"duplication\".", "seems to harm the intention of this site and is overall unjustified. Questions", "it seems to me as different than the alleged original. (See my comment", "is overall unjustified. Questions that are \"similar\" can still vary in a very", "quality vs. quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity) was tagged as duplicate. But it seems to me as", "duplicate. But it seems to me as different than the alleged original. (See", "can still vary in a very substantive way. Recent example: [Publishing: quality vs.", "tagged as duplicate. But it seems to me as different than the alleged", "of this site and is overall unjustified. Questions that are \"similar\" can still", "in a very substantive way. Recent example: [Publishing: quality vs. quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity) was tagged", "substantive way. Recent example: [Publishing: quality vs. quantity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/72299/publishing-quality-vs-quantity) was tagged as duplicate. But" ]
[ "to figure things out and pick other people's brains, but I'm new to", "on random sites to figure things out and pick other people's brains, but", "brains, but I'm new to this site so I'm trying to figure it", "site so I'm trying to figure it out so I don't get my", "like asking questions on random sites to figure things out and pick other", "figure things out and pick other people's brains, but I'm new to this", "figure it out so I don't get my questions shut down all the", "to this site so I'm trying to figure it out so I don't", "so I'm trying to figure it out so I don't get my questions", "but I'm new to this site so I'm trying to figure it out", "and pick other people's brains, but I'm new to this site so I'm", "things out and pick other people's brains, but I'm new to this site", "other people's brains, but I'm new to this site so I'm trying to", "I'm new to this site so I'm trying to figure it out so", "out and pick other people's brains, but I'm new to this site so", "questions on random sites to figure things out and pick other people's brains,", "pick other people's brains, but I'm new to this site so I'm trying", "new to this site so I'm trying to figure it out so I", "sites to figure things out and pick other people's brains, but I'm new", "I'm trying to figure it out so I don't get my questions shut", "trying to figure it out so I don't get my questions shut down", "to figure it out so I don't get my questions shut down all", "it out so I don't get my questions shut down all the time.", "this site so I'm trying to figure it out so I don't get", "I like asking questions on random sites to figure things out and pick", "asking questions on random sites to figure things out and pick other people's", "random sites to figure things out and pick other people's brains, but I'm", "people's brains, but I'm new to this site so I'm trying to figure" ]
[ "want, so keep proposing names and keep voting for the ones you like.", "[rename our chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109). Should we rename our chat room and if so", "room has been renamed. We can change it again whenever we want, so", "rename our chat room and if so to what? **UPDATE** the chat room", "been renamed. We can change it again whenever we want, so keep proposing", "it again whenever we want, so keep proposing names and keep voting for", "whenever we want, so keep proposing names and keep voting for the ones", "room and if so to what? **UPDATE** the chat room has been renamed.", "change it again whenever we want, so keep proposing names and keep voting", "our chat room and if so to what? **UPDATE** the chat room has", "renamed. We can change it again whenever we want, so keep proposing names", "[creative names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active) for their chat rooms. It was suggested that we [rename our", "chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109). Should we rename our chat room and if so to what?", "that we [rename our chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109). Should we rename our chat room and", "names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active) for their chat rooms. It was suggested that we [rename our chat", "up with [creative names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active) for their chat rooms. It was suggested that we", "we rename our chat room and if so to what? **UPDATE** the chat", "again whenever we want, so keep proposing names and keep voting for the", "It was suggested that we [rename our chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109). Should we rename our", "*academia*. Some sites have come up with [creative names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active) for their chat rooms.", "for their chat rooms. It was suggested that we [rename our chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109).", "We can change it again whenever we want, so keep proposing names and", "Our [chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/academia) has the default name of *academia*. Some sites have come", "if so to what? **UPDATE** the chat room has been renamed. We can", "the chat room has been renamed. We can change it again whenever we", "name of *academia*. Some sites have come up with [creative names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active) for their", "we [rename our chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109). Should we rename our chat room and if", "we want, so keep proposing names and keep voting for the ones you", "our chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109). Should we rename our chat room and if so to", "chat room and if so to what? **UPDATE** the chat room has been", "have come up with [creative names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active) for their chat rooms. It was suggested", "come up with [creative names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active) for their chat rooms. It was suggested that", "room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/academia) has the default name of *academia*. Some sites have come up with", "has been renamed. We can change it again whenever we want, so keep", "with [creative names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active) for their chat rooms. It was suggested that we [rename", "so to what? **UPDATE** the chat room has been renamed. We can change", "**UPDATE** the chat room has been renamed. We can change it again whenever", "[chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/academia) has the default name of *academia*. Some sites have come up", "of *academia*. Some sites have come up with [creative names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active) for their chat", "chat room has been renamed. We can change it again whenever we want,", "sites have come up with [creative names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active) for their chat rooms. It was", "can change it again whenever we want, so keep proposing names and keep", "suggested that we [rename our chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109). Should we rename our chat room", "room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109). Should we rename our chat room and if so to what? **UPDATE**", "the default name of *academia*. Some sites have come up with [creative names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active)", "what? **UPDATE** the chat room has been renamed. We can change it again", "their chat rooms. It was suggested that we [rename our chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109). Should", "Should we rename our chat room and if so to what? **UPDATE** the", "chat rooms. It was suggested that we [rename our chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109). Should we", "rooms. It was suggested that we [rename our chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109). Should we rename", "has the default name of *academia*. Some sites have come up with [creative", "Some sites have come up with [creative names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active) for their chat rooms. It", "default name of *academia*. Some sites have come up with [creative names](http://chat.stackexchange.com/?tab=all&sort=active) for", "was suggested that we [rename our chat room](http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/31720109#31720109). Should we rename our chat", "and if so to what? **UPDATE** the chat room has been renamed. We", "to what? **UPDATE** the chat room has been renamed. We can change it" ]
[ "I am sorry for this contentious question, but I couldn't help but noticing", "waive his/her conference fees by contacting the organizers (this is in comments, though).", "wrong :) If the answers were a bit modest and reserved it would", "and experience in academia, completely wrong :) If the answers were a bit", "completely wrong :) If the answers were a bit modest and reserved it", "advise major users here to reserve their answers a bit more, as to", "have published in a high ranking journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a) Where people claim that it is", "contacting the organizers (this is in comments, though). [Is it ok to show", "perception and understanding and experience in academia, completely wrong :) If the answers", "the organizers (this is in comments, though). [Is it ok to show up", "for this contentious question, but I couldn't help but noticing lately that many", "up to a conference without registering if I don't eat any meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me) Or", "the more assertive tone they use! **Question**: Is there anything a user can", "that many answers and comments here are, to my perception and understanding and", "a high ranking journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a) Where people claim that it is inadequate to ask", "as to avoid giving people a possibly wrong advice by mistake? --- Here", "were a bit modest and reserved it would be mildly okay. But it", "comments, though). [Is it ok to show up to a conference without registering", "bit modest and reserved it would be mildly okay. But it seems that", "a way to advise major users here to reserve their answers a bit", "Here is a recent example, where people are claiming, e.g., that the student", "I have published in a high ranking journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a) Where people claim that it", "to ask for a reference from a senior professor unless he/she *knows you", "student cannot ask to waive his/her conference fees by contacting the organizers (this", "okay. But it seems that the more wrong some answers are the more", "wrong some answers are the more assertive tone they use! **Question**: Is there", "can do about this? Is there a way to advise major users here", "ask to waive his/her conference fees by contacting the organizers (this is in", "fees by contacting the organizers (this is in comments, though). [Is it ok", "registering if I don't eat any meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me) Or another example: [Would it be", "example: [Would it be rude to ask a famous professor who doesn't know", "mistake? --- Here is a recent example, where people are claiming, e.g., that", "am sorry for this contentious question, but I couldn't help but noticing lately", "answers a bit more, as to avoid giving people a possibly wrong advice", "--- Here is a recent example, where people are claiming, e.g., that the", "e.g., that the student cannot ask to waive his/her conference fees by contacting", "(this is in comments, though). [Is it ok to show up to a", "modest and reserved it would be mildly okay. But it seems that the", "academia, completely wrong :) If the answers were a bit modest and reserved", "anything a user can do about this? Is there a way to advise", "about this? Is there a way to advise major users here to reserve", "users here to reserve their answers a bit more, as to avoid giving", "it be rude to ask a famous professor who doesn't know me personally", "people are claiming, e.g., that the student cannot ask to waive his/her conference", "for a recommendation letter if I have published in a high ranking journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a)", "famous professor who doesn't know me personally for a recommendation letter if I", "If the answers were a bit modest and reserved it would be mildly", "seems that the more wrong some answers are the more assertive tone they", "here to reserve their answers a bit more, as to avoid giving people", "reserve their answers a bit more, as to avoid giving people a possibly", "[Is it ok to show up to a conference without registering if I", "ok to show up to a conference without registering if I don't eat", "answers were a bit modest and reserved it would be mildly okay. But", "that the more wrong some answers are the more assertive tone they use!", "the student cannot ask to waive his/her conference fees by contacting the organizers", "without registering if I don't eat any meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me) Or another example: [Would it", "to my perception and understanding and experience in academia, completely wrong :) If", "question, but I couldn't help but noticing lately that many answers and comments", "experience in academia, completely wrong :) If the answers were a bit modest", "be rude to ask a famous professor who doesn't know me personally for", "any meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me) Or another example: [Would it be rude to ask a famous", "reserved it would be mildly okay. But it seems that the more wrong", "ask for a reference from a senior professor unless he/she *knows you personally*!", "to waive his/her conference fees by contacting the organizers (this is in comments,", "a user can do about this? Is there a way to advise major", "people claim that it is inadequate to ask for a reference from a", "conference fees by contacting the organizers (this is in comments, though). [Is it", "[Would it be rude to ask a famous professor who doesn't know me", "inadequate to ask for a reference from a senior professor unless he/she *knows", "the more wrong some answers are the more assertive tone they use! **Question**:", "recent example, where people are claiming, e.g., that the student cannot ask to", "organizers (this is in comments, though). [Is it ok to show up to", "here are, to my perception and understanding and experience in academia, completely wrong", "would be mildly okay. But it seems that the more wrong some answers", "some answers are the more assertive tone they use! **Question**: Is there anything", "a famous professor who doesn't know me personally for a recommendation letter if", "to show up to a conference without registering if I don't eat any", "But it seems that the more wrong some answers are the more assertive", "is a recent example, where people are claiming, e.g., that the student cannot", "though). [Is it ok to show up to a conference without registering if", "example, where people are claiming, e.g., that the student cannot ask to waive", "is in comments, though). [Is it ok to show up to a conference", "it is inadequate to ask for a reference from a senior professor unless", "their answers a bit more, as to avoid giving people a possibly wrong", "a recent example, where people are claiming, e.g., that the student cannot ask", "ask a famous professor who doesn't know me personally for a recommendation letter", "more assertive tone they use! **Question**: Is there anything a user can do", "do about this? Is there a way to advise major users here to", "claiming, e.g., that the student cannot ask to waive his/her conference fees by", "high ranking journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a) Where people claim that it is inadequate to ask for", "and comments here are, to my perception and understanding and experience in academia,", "wrong advice by mistake? --- Here is a recent example, where people are", "meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me) Or another example: [Would it be rude to ask a famous professor", "the answers were a bit modest and reserved it would be mildly okay.", "there anything a user can do about this? Is there a way to", "it would be mildly okay. But it seems that the more wrong some", "comments here are, to my perception and understanding and experience in academia, completely", "**Question**: Is there anything a user can do about this? Is there a", "by mistake? --- Here is a recent example, where people are claiming, e.g.,", "to advise major users here to reserve their answers a bit more, as", "by contacting the organizers (this is in comments, though). [Is it ok to", "people a possibly wrong advice by mistake? --- Here is a recent example,", "bit more, as to avoid giving people a possibly wrong advice by mistake?", "and understanding and experience in academia, completely wrong :) If the answers were", "sorry for this contentious question, but I couldn't help but noticing lately that", "letter if I have published in a high ranking journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a) Where people claim", "my perception and understanding and experience in academia, completely wrong :) If the", "mildly okay. But it seems that the more wrong some answers are the", "many answers and comments here are, to my perception and understanding and experience", "be mildly okay. But it seems that the more wrong some answers are", "and reserved it would be mildly okay. But it seems that the more", "if I have published in a high ranking journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a) Where people claim that", "answers and comments here are, to my perception and understanding and experience in", "that the student cannot ask to waive his/her conference fees by contacting the", "claim that it is inadequate to ask for a reference from a senior", "cannot ask to waive his/her conference fees by contacting the organizers (this is", "a recommendation letter if I have published in a high ranking journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a) Where", "published in a high ranking journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a) Where people claim that it is inadequate", "in a high ranking journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a) Where people claim that it is inadequate to", "ranking journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a) Where people claim that it is inadequate to ask for a", "assertive tone they use! **Question**: Is there anything a user can do about", "Where people claim that it is inadequate to ask for a reference from", "advice by mistake? --- Here is a recent example, where people are claiming,", "conference without registering if I don't eat any meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me) Or another example: [Would", "help but noticing lately that many answers and comments here are, to my", "use! **Question**: Is there anything a user can do about this? Is there", "Is there a way to advise major users here to reserve their answers", "a conference without registering if I don't eat any meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me) Or another example:", "noticing lately that many answers and comments here are, to my perception and", "I couldn't help but noticing lately that many answers and comments here are,", "couldn't help but noticing lately that many answers and comments here are, to", "user can do about this? Is there a way to advise major users", "it ok to show up to a conference without registering if I don't", "a bit modest and reserved it would be mildly okay. But it seems", "rude to ask a famous professor who doesn't know me personally for a", "professor who doesn't know me personally for a recommendation letter if I have", "journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a) Where people claim that it is inadequate to ask for a reference", "a bit more, as to avoid giving people a possibly wrong advice by", "in academia, completely wrong :) If the answers were a bit modest and", "they use! **Question**: Is there anything a user can do about this? Is", ":) If the answers were a bit modest and reserved it would be", "but I couldn't help but noticing lately that many answers and comments here", "to a conference without registering if I don't eat any meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me) Or another", "show up to a conference without registering if I don't eat any meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me)", "doesn't know me personally for a recommendation letter if I have published in", "way to advise major users here to reserve their answers a bit more,", "me personally for a recommendation letter if I have published in a high", "this contentious question, but I couldn't help but noticing lately that many answers", "answers are the more assertive tone they use! **Question**: Is there anything a", "contentious question, but I couldn't help but noticing lately that many answers and", "to ask a famous professor who doesn't know me personally for a recommendation", "that it is inadequate to ask for a reference from a senior professor", "Or another example: [Would it be rude to ask a famous professor who", "to avoid giving people a possibly wrong advice by mistake? --- Here is", "more, as to avoid giving people a possibly wrong advice by mistake? ---", "Is there anything a user can do about this? Is there a way", "to reserve their answers a bit more, as to avoid giving people a", "his/her conference fees by contacting the organizers (this is in comments, though). [Is", "personally for a recommendation letter if I have published in a high ranking", "tone they use! **Question**: Is there anything a user can do about this?", "major users here to reserve their answers a bit more, as to avoid", "in comments, though). [Is it ok to show up to a conference without", "if I don't eat any meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me) Or another example: [Would it be rude", "know me personally for a recommendation letter if I have published in a", "giving people a possibly wrong advice by mistake? --- Here is a recent", "are claiming, e.g., that the student cannot ask to waive his/her conference fees", "it seems that the more wrong some answers are the more assertive tone", "this? Is there a way to advise major users here to reserve their", "recommendation letter if I have published in a high ranking journal?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75318/would-it-be-rude-to-ask-a-famous-professor-who-doesnt-know-me-personally-for-a) Where people", "are, to my perception and understanding and experience in academia, completely wrong :)", "possibly wrong advice by mistake? --- Here is a recent example, where people", "another example: [Would it be rude to ask a famous professor who doesn't", "are the more assertive tone they use! **Question**: Is there anything a user", "avoid giving people a possibly wrong advice by mistake? --- Here is a", "a possibly wrong advice by mistake? --- Here is a recent example, where", "more wrong some answers are the more assertive tone they use! **Question**: Is", "where people are claiming, e.g., that the student cannot ask to waive his/her", "eat any meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me) Or another example: [Would it be rude to ask a", "I don't eat any meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me) Or another example: [Would it be rude to", "lately that many answers and comments here are, to my perception and understanding", "don't eat any meals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/75358/is-it-ok-to-show-up-to-a-conference-without-registering-nor-having-conference-me) Or another example: [Would it be rude to ask", "there a way to advise major users here to reserve their answers a", "who doesn't know me personally for a recommendation letter if I have published", "is inadequate to ask for a reference from a senior professor unless he/she", "but noticing lately that many answers and comments here are, to my perception", "understanding and experience in academia, completely wrong :) If the answers were a" ]
[ "Academia.SE, I got very candid and useful comments and suggestions from at least", "I got very candid and useful comments and suggestions from at least four", "them in the comments section. Should I refrain from this and instead just", "and useful comments and suggestions from at least four professors. I want to", "comments section. Should I refrain from this and instead just upvote the comments?", "from at least four professors. I want to say \"thanks, professor X\" to", "suggestions from at least four professors. I want to say \"thanks, professor X\"", "the comments section. Should I refrain from this and instead just upvote the", "at least four professors. I want to say \"thanks, professor X\" to each", "\"noise\" on the SE network and should be avoided? For example, my last", "useful comments and suggestions from at least four professors. I want to say", "one of them in the comments section. Should I refrain from this and", "my last question on Academia.SE, I got very candid and useful comments and", "comments and suggestions from at least four professors. I want to say \"thanks,", "to each one of them in the comments section. Should I refrain from", "to say \"thanks, professor X\" to each one of them in the comments", "I want to say \"thanks, professor X\" to each one of them in", "is this considered \"noise\" on the SE network and should be avoided? For", "the SE network and should be avoided? For example, my last question on", "and suggestions from at least four professors. I want to say \"thanks, professor", "and should be avoided? For example, my last question on Academia.SE, I got", "example, my last question on Academia.SE, I got very candid and useful comments", "got very candid and useful comments and suggestions from at least four professors.", "Or is this considered \"noise\" on the SE network and should be avoided?", "should be avoided? For example, my last question on Academia.SE, I got very", "candid and useful comments and suggestions from at least four professors. I want", "X\" to each one of them in the comments section. Should I refrain", "considered \"noise\" on the SE network and should be avoided? For example, my", "on Academia.SE, I got very candid and useful comments and suggestions from at", "network and should be avoided? For example, my last question on Academia.SE, I", "avoided? For example, my last question on Academia.SE, I got very candid and", "\"thanks, professor X\" to each one of them in the comments section. Should", "this considered \"noise\" on the SE network and should be avoided? For example,", "very candid and useful comments and suggestions from at least four professors. I", "each one of them in the comments section. Should I refrain from this", "of them in the comments section. Should I refrain from this and instead", "on the SE network and should be avoided? For example, my last question", "four professors. I want to say \"thanks, professor X\" to each one of", "least four professors. I want to say \"thanks, professor X\" to each one", "want to say \"thanks, professor X\" to each one of them in the", "be avoided? For example, my last question on Academia.SE, I got very candid", "professor X\" to each one of them in the comments section. Should I", "in the comments section. Should I refrain from this and instead just upvote", "question on Academia.SE, I got very candid and useful comments and suggestions from", "SE network and should be avoided? For example, my last question on Academia.SE,", "say \"thanks, professor X\" to each one of them in the comments section.", "last question on Academia.SE, I got very candid and useful comments and suggestions", "professors. I want to say \"thanks, professor X\" to each one of them", "For example, my last question on Academia.SE, I got very candid and useful" ]
[ "clear that ff524 and I had different understandings of how the tag was", "used are based on how the same tag is used on mathoverflow: >", "might be, \"Can anyone point me to some references on the history of", "> > > Academia.SE currently has this somewhat vague definition: > > Questions", "how the same tag is used on mathoverflow: > > This tag is", "be, \"Can anyone point me to some references on the history of the", "somewhat vague definition: > > Questions requesting a supporting document or citation for", "> In a recent discussion in comments on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482), it became clear", "topic. ff524 says: \"My understanding is that many answers here are based on", "anyone point me to some references on the history of the German university", "on mathoverflow, so that it would be narrowly defined, and would only be", "should be used are based on how the same tag is used on", "how the tag was to be understood on academia.SE. My understanding was that", "experience, and that reference-request distinguishes questions that seek answers that are substantiated by", "it became clear that ff524 and I had different understandings of how the", "on that topic. ff524 says: \"My understanding is that many answers here are", "reference-request distinguishes questions that seek answers that are substantiated by reliable evidence (with", "are based on how the same tag is used on mathoverflow: > >", "My understanding was that it should mean the same thing as on mathoverflow,", "should mean the same thing as on mathoverflow, so that it would be", "reliable evidence (with citations to said evidence). I agree that it would be", "textbook on a specific result. > > > Academia.SE currently has this somewhat", "that many answers here are based on personal experience, and that reference-request distinguishes", "answers that are substantiated by reliable evidence (with citations to said evidence). I", "How should we clarify the definition of this tag? related: [Disambiguating reference-request tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags)", "comments on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482), it became clear that ff524 and I had different", "and I had different understandings of how the tag was to be understood", "university system?,\" and a typical answer would be a pointer to a book", "expectations for how the reference-request tag should be used are based on how", "many answers here are based on personal experience, and that reference-request distinguishes questions", "of this tag? related: [Disambiguating reference-request tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags) [Is it apropriate to use the", "understanding was that it should mean the same thing as on mathoverflow, so", "used on mathoverflow: > > This tag is used if a reference is", "[Disambiguating reference-request tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags) [Is it apropriate to use the reference-request tag to prevent", "for how the reference-request tag should be used are based on how the", "be used are based on how the same tag is used on mathoverflow:", "\"My understanding is that many answers here are based on personal experience, and", "I had different understandings of how the tag was to be understood on", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482), it became clear that ff524 and I had different understandings of how", "to me. How should we clarify the definition of this tag? related: [Disambiguating", "tag should be used are based on how the same tag is used", "narrowly defined, and would only be for questions where the entire answer would", "references on the history of the German university system?,\" and a typical answer", "a specific query. > > > In a recent discussion in comments on", "on mathoverflow: > > This tag is used if a reference is needed", "result. > > > Academia.SE currently has this somewhat vague definition: > >", "for a specific query. > > > In a recent discussion in comments", "answer would simply be a reference. For instance, the question might be, \"Can", "in comments on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482), it became clear that ff524 and I had", "reference-request tag should be used are based on how the same tag is", "citation for a specific query. > > > In a recent discussion in", "ambiguous to me. How should we clarify the definition of this tag? related:", "said evidence). I agree that it would be a good idea to clarify", "current definition on academia.SE seems ambiguous to me. How should we clarify the", "so that it would be narrowly defined, and would only be for questions", "definition of this tag? related: [Disambiguating reference-request tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags) [Is it apropriate to use", "has this somewhat vague definition: > > Questions requesting a supporting document or", "was to be understood on academia.SE. My understanding was that it should mean", "it apropriate to use the reference-request tag to prevent discussion-like questions from being", "be a good idea to clarify on meta.\" The current definition on academia.SE", "the tag was to be understood on academia.SE. My understanding was that it", "currently has this somewhat vague definition: > > Questions requesting a supporting document", "that it would be a good idea to clarify on meta.\" The current", "be a reference. For instance, the question might be, \"Can anyone point me", "I agree that it would be a good idea to clarify on meta.\"", "meta.\" The current definition on academia.SE seems ambiguous to me. How should we", "instance, the question might be, \"Can anyone point me to some references on", "academia.SE seems ambiguous to me. How should we clarify the definition of this", "point me to some references on the history of the German university system?,\"", "Academia.SE currently has this somewhat vague definition: > > Questions requesting a supporting", "on the history of the German university system?,\" and a typical answer would", "idea to clarify on meta.\" The current definition on academia.SE seems ambiguous to", "apropriate to use the reference-request tag to prevent discussion-like questions from being closed?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2209/is-it-apropriate-to-use-the-reference-request-tag-to-prevent-discussion-like-que)", "\"Can anyone point me to some references on the history of the German", "pointer to a book on that topic. ff524 says: \"My understanding is that", "me. How should we clarify the definition of this tag? related: [Disambiguating reference-request", "me to some references on the history of the German university system?,\" and", "> > Questions requesting a supporting document or citation for a specific query.", "definition: > > Questions requesting a supporting document or citation for a specific", "that ff524 and I had different understandings of how the tag was to", "defined, and would only be for questions where the entire answer would simply", "book on that topic. ff524 says: \"My understanding is that many answers here", "understandings of how the tag was to be understood on academia.SE. My understanding", "on meta.\" The current definition on academia.SE seems ambiguous to me. How should", "system?,\" and a typical answer would be a pointer to a book on", "are based on personal experience, and that reference-request distinguishes questions that seek answers", "reference. For instance, the question might be, \"Can anyone point me to some", "on personal experience, and that reference-request distinguishes questions that seek answers that are", "> > Academia.SE currently has this somewhat vague definition: > > Questions requesting", "Questions requesting a supporting document or citation for a specific query. > >", "personal experience, and that reference-request distinguishes questions that seek answers that are substantiated", "used if a reference is needed in a paper or textbook on a", "mathoverflow: > > This tag is used if a reference is needed in", "it would be a good idea to clarify on meta.\" The current definition", "to clarify on meta.\" The current definition on academia.SE seems ambiguous to me.", "that topic. ff524 says: \"My understanding is that many answers here are based", "clarify on meta.\" The current definition on academia.SE seems ambiguous to me. How", "we clarify the definition of this tag? related: [Disambiguating reference-request tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags) [Is it", "the reference-request tag should be used are based on how the same tag", "here are based on personal experience, and that reference-request distinguishes questions that seek", "would only be for questions where the entire answer would simply be a", "the history of the German university system?,\" and a typical answer would be", "if a reference is needed in a paper or textbook on a specific", "on a specific result. > > > Academia.SE currently has this somewhat vague", "mathoverflow, so that it would be narrowly defined, and would only be for", "would be a pointer to a book on that topic. ff524 says: \"My", "in a paper or textbook on a specific result. > > > Academia.SE", "to said evidence). I agree that it would be a good idea to", "the definition of this tag? related: [Disambiguating reference-request tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags) [Is it apropriate to", "it should mean the same thing as on mathoverflow, so that it would", "on how the same tag is used on mathoverflow: > > This tag", "how the reference-request tag should be used are based on how the same", "paper or textbook on a specific result. > > > Academia.SE currently has", "ff524 says: \"My understanding is that many answers here are based on personal", "the same tag is used on mathoverflow: > > This tag is used", "specific query. > > > In a recent discussion in comments on [this", "based on personal experience, and that reference-request distinguishes questions that seek answers that", "by reliable evidence (with citations to said evidence). I agree that it would", "reference-request tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags) [Is it apropriate to use the reference-request tag to prevent discussion-like", "> > > In a recent discussion in comments on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482), it", "would be narrowly defined, and would only be for questions where the entire", "be narrowly defined, and would only be for questions where the entire answer", "simply be a reference. For instance, the question might be, \"Can anyone point", "tag is used on mathoverflow: > > This tag is used if a", "be a pointer to a book on that topic. ff524 says: \"My understanding", "entire answer would simply be a reference. For instance, the question might be,", "a book on that topic. ff524 says: \"My understanding is that many answers", "the same thing as on mathoverflow, so that it would be narrowly defined,", "thing as on mathoverflow, so that it would be narrowly defined, and would", "of the German university system?,\" and a typical answer would be a pointer", "different understandings of how the tag was to be understood on academia.SE. My", "answers here are based on personal experience, and that reference-request distinguishes questions that", "says: \"My understanding is that many answers here are based on personal experience,", "or textbook on a specific result. > > > Academia.SE currently has this", "and a typical answer would be a pointer to a book on that", "to a book on that topic. ff524 says: \"My understanding is that many", "is needed in a paper or textbook on a specific result. > >", "tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags) [Is it apropriate to use the reference-request tag to prevent discussion-like questions", "citations to said evidence). I agree that it would be a good idea", "on academia.SE. My understanding was that it should mean the same thing as", "> > In a recent discussion in comments on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482), it became", "definition on academia.SE seems ambiguous to me. How should we clarify the definition", "a reference is needed in a paper or textbook on a specific result.", "agree that it would be a good idea to clarify on meta.\" The", "In a recent discussion in comments on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482), it became clear that", "to be understood on academia.SE. My understanding was that it should mean the", "tag was to be understood on academia.SE. My understanding was that it should", "query. > > > In a recent discussion in comments on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482),", "and would only be for questions where the entire answer would simply be", "that reference-request distinguishes questions that seek answers that are substantiated by reliable evidence", "and that reference-request distinguishes questions that seek answers that are substantiated by reliable", "had different understandings of how the tag was to be understood on academia.SE.", "was that it should mean the same thing as on mathoverflow, so that", "a supporting document or citation for a specific query. > > > In", "as on mathoverflow, so that it would be narrowly defined, and would only", "is used if a reference is needed in a paper or textbook on", "on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482), it became clear that ff524 and I had different understandings", "questions that seek answers that are substantiated by reliable evidence (with citations to", "only be for questions where the entire answer would simply be a reference.", "history of the German university system?,\" and a typical answer would be a", "requesting a supporting document or citation for a specific query. > > >", "document or citation for a specific query. > > > In a recent", "a recent discussion in comments on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482), it became clear that ff524", "understood on academia.SE. My understanding was that it should mean the same thing", "that it should mean the same thing as on mathoverflow, so that it", "distinguishes questions that seek answers that are substantiated by reliable evidence (with citations", "related: [Disambiguating reference-request tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags) [Is it apropriate to use the reference-request tag to", "that it would be narrowly defined, and would only be for questions where", "evidence (with citations to said evidence). I agree that it would be a", "answer would be a pointer to a book on that topic. ff524 says:", "on academia.SE seems ambiguous to me. How should we clarify the definition of", "are substantiated by reliable evidence (with citations to said evidence). I agree that", "be for questions where the entire answer would simply be a reference. For", "that seek answers that are substantiated by reliable evidence (with citations to said", "should we clarify the definition of this tag? related: [Disambiguating reference-request tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags) [Is", "questions where the entire answer would simply be a reference. For instance, the", "tag? related: [Disambiguating reference-request tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags) [Is it apropriate to use the reference-request tag", "needed in a paper or textbook on a specific result. > > >", "mean the same thing as on mathoverflow, so that it would be narrowly", "a specific result. > > > Academia.SE currently has this somewhat vague definition:", "> Academia.SE currently has this somewhat vague definition: > > Questions requesting a", "a paper or textbook on a specific result. > > > Academia.SE currently", "a pointer to a book on that topic. ff524 says: \"My understanding is", "discussion in comments on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482), it became clear that ff524 and I", "be understood on academia.SE. My understanding was that it should mean the same", "seek answers that are substantiated by reliable evidence (with citations to said evidence).", "specific result. > > > Academia.SE currently has this somewhat vague definition: >", "that are substantiated by reliable evidence (with citations to said evidence). I agree", "The current definition on academia.SE seems ambiguous to me. How should we clarify", "question might be, \"Can anyone point me to some references on the history", "vague definition: > > Questions requesting a supporting document or citation for a", "is used on mathoverflow: > > This tag is used if a reference", "would simply be a reference. For instance, the question might be, \"Can anyone", "For instance, the question might be, \"Can anyone point me to some references", "would be a good idea to clarify on meta.\" The current definition on", "academia.SE. My understanding was that it should mean the same thing as on", "where the entire answer would simply be a reference. For instance, the question", "(with citations to said evidence). I agree that it would be a good", "> This tag is used if a reference is needed in a paper", "> > This tag is used if a reference is needed in a", "This tag is used if a reference is needed in a paper or", "clarify the definition of this tag? related: [Disambiguating reference-request tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags) [Is it apropriate", "became clear that ff524 and I had different understandings of how the tag", "> Questions requesting a supporting document or citation for a specific query. >", "reference is needed in a paper or textbook on a specific result. >", "understanding is that many answers here are based on personal experience, and that", "recent discussion in comments on [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482), it became clear that ff524 and", "to some references on the history of the German university system?,\" and a", "this somewhat vague definition: > > Questions requesting a supporting document or citation", "it would be narrowly defined, and would only be for questions where the", "the entire answer would simply be a reference. For instance, the question might", "supporting document or citation for a specific query. > > > In a", "a typical answer would be a pointer to a book on that topic.", "typical answer would be a pointer to a book on that topic. ff524", "same tag is used on mathoverflow: > > This tag is used if", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/75573/1482), it became clear that ff524 and I had different understandings of", "or citation for a specific query. > > > In a recent discussion", "some references on the history of the German university system?,\" and a typical", "for questions where the entire answer would simply be a reference. For instance,", "evidence). I agree that it would be a good idea to clarify on", "the question might be, \"Can anyone point me to some references on the", "is that many answers here are based on personal experience, and that reference-request", "tag is used if a reference is needed in a paper or textbook", "seems ambiguous to me. How should we clarify the definition of this tag?", "ff524 and I had different understandings of how the tag was to be", "German university system?,\" and a typical answer would be a pointer to a", "good idea to clarify on meta.\" The current definition on academia.SE seems ambiguous", "of how the tag was to be understood on academia.SE. My understanding was", "a reference. For instance, the question might be, \"Can anyone point me to", "My expectations for how the reference-request tag should be used are based on", "[Is it apropriate to use the reference-request tag to prevent discussion-like questions from", "based on how the same tag is used on mathoverflow: > > This", "this tag? related: [Disambiguating reference-request tags](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/954/disambiguating-reference-request-tags) [Is it apropriate to use the reference-request", "substantiated by reliable evidence (with citations to said evidence). I agree that it", "the German university system?,\" and a typical answer would be a pointer to", "a good idea to clarify on meta.\" The current definition on academia.SE seems", "same thing as on mathoverflow, so that it would be narrowly defined, and" ]
[ "currently upvoted back that answer, since I don't have that many points to", "reputation points to downvote an answer? I currently upvoted back that answer, since", "I currently upvoted back that answer, since I don't have that many points", "back that answer, since I don't have that many points to squander :(", "reputation sort of like a \"currency\" and that it \"costs\" me reputation points", "like a \"currency\" and that it \"costs\" me reputation points to downvote an", "reputation points for downvoting? Is reputation sort of like a \"currency\" and that", "downvoting? Is reputation sort of like a \"currency\" and that it \"costs\" me", "\"currency\" and that it \"costs\" me reputation points to downvote an answer? I", "lose reputation points for downvoting? Is reputation sort of like a \"currency\" and", "come I lose reputation points for downvoting? Is reputation sort of like a", "of like a \"currency\" and that it \"costs\" me reputation points to downvote", "points to downvote an answer? I currently upvoted back that answer, since I", "Is reputation sort of like a \"currency\" and that it \"costs\" me reputation", "I lose reputation points for downvoting? Is reputation sort of like a \"currency\"", "for downvoting? Is reputation sort of like a \"currency\" and that it \"costs\"", "me reputation points to downvote an answer? I currently upvoted back that answer,", "answer? I currently upvoted back that answer, since I don't have that many", "a \"currency\" and that it \"costs\" me reputation points to downvote an answer?", "that it \"costs\" me reputation points to downvote an answer? I currently upvoted", "downvote an answer? I currently upvoted back that answer, since I don't have", "to downvote an answer? I currently upvoted back that answer, since I don't", "How come I lose reputation points for downvoting? Is reputation sort of like", "and that it \"costs\" me reputation points to downvote an answer? I currently", "it \"costs\" me reputation points to downvote an answer? I currently upvoted back", "points for downvoting? Is reputation sort of like a \"currency\" and that it", "sort of like a \"currency\" and that it \"costs\" me reputation points to", "\"costs\" me reputation points to downvote an answer? I currently upvoted back that", "upvoted back that answer, since I don't have that many points to squander", "an answer? I currently upvoted back that answer, since I don't have that" ]
[ "capitalization or word capitalization, use a comma instead of a colon, or have", "or word capitalization, use a comma instead of a colon, or have the", "style on topic? They are mechanistic rules that only tangentially have to do", "or have the citation inside the quote or outside -- the answer is", "of a colon, or have the citation inside the quote or outside --", "that only tangentially have to do with academia. Whether you choose to have", "citation style on topic? They are mechanistic rules that only tangentially have to", "on citation style on topic? They are mechanistic rules that only tangentially have", "rules that only tangentially have to do with academia. Whether you choose to", "Whether you choose to have sentence capitalization or word capitalization, use a comma", "comma instead of a colon, or have the citation inside the quote or", "sentence capitalization or word capitalization, use a comma instead of a colon, or", "or outside -- the answer is the same: look at your style guide.", "quote or outside -- the answer is the same: look at your style", "tangentially have to do with academia. Whether you choose to have sentence capitalization", "on topic? They are mechanistic rules that only tangentially have to do with", "only tangentially have to do with academia. Whether you choose to have sentence", "have to do with academia. Whether you choose to have sentence capitalization or", "colon, or have the citation inside the quote or outside -- the answer", "are questions on citation style on topic? They are mechanistic rules that only", "instead of a colon, or have the citation inside the quote or outside", "inside the quote or outside -- the answer is the same: look at", "the citation inside the quote or outside -- the answer is the same:", "you choose to have sentence capitalization or word capitalization, use a comma instead", "Why are questions on citation style on topic? They are mechanistic rules that", "capitalization, use a comma instead of a colon, or have the citation inside", "a colon, or have the citation inside the quote or outside -- the", "have sentence capitalization or word capitalization, use a comma instead of a colon,", "choose to have sentence capitalization or word capitalization, use a comma instead of", "word capitalization, use a comma instead of a colon, or have the citation", "the quote or outside -- the answer is the same: look at your", "to do with academia. Whether you choose to have sentence capitalization or word", "to have sentence capitalization or word capitalization, use a comma instead of a", "are mechanistic rules that only tangentially have to do with academia. Whether you", "mechanistic rules that only tangentially have to do with academia. Whether you choose", "have the citation inside the quote or outside -- the answer is the", "a comma instead of a colon, or have the citation inside the quote", "They are mechanistic rules that only tangentially have to do with academia. Whether", "do with academia. Whether you choose to have sentence capitalization or word capitalization,", "questions on citation style on topic? They are mechanistic rules that only tangentially", "academia. Whether you choose to have sentence capitalization or word capitalization, use a", "citation inside the quote or outside -- the answer is the same: look", "use a comma instead of a colon, or have the citation inside the", "topic? They are mechanistic rules that only tangentially have to do with academia.", "with academia. Whether you choose to have sentence capitalization or word capitalization, use" ]
[ "Question 2 has now being closed and then reopened after edits. And a", "comments war. We failed to close this one soon enough: [If you're black,", "edits. And a major clean up of comments helped a lot. Thanks to", "war. We failed to close this one soon enough: [If you're black, how", "etc. in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643) Deletion would be the best but closing would already help.", "we act swiftly on that one?: [What is the purpose of women-only meetings,", "It's the second time in less than a week that a question attracts", "of women-only meetings, panels, conferences, etc. in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643) Deletion would be the best", "youtube-quality comments war. We failed to close this one soon enough: [If you're", "[What is the purpose of women-only meetings, panels, conferences, etc. in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643) Deletion", "in favor of closing/deleting said question and down-votes against. **Edit:** Question 2 has", "note that in a typical meta fashion, up-votes on this question mean in", "a major clean up of comments helped a lot. Thanks to the moderation.", "And a major clean up of comments helped a lot. Thanks to the", "this question mean in favor of closing/deleting said question and down-votes against. **Edit:**", "do you answer \"Oh you're a professor? So you teach African Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643) Can", "is the purpose of women-only meetings, panels, conferences, etc. in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643) Deletion would", "to close this one soon enough: [If you're black, how do you answer", "down-votes against. **Edit:** Question 2 has now being closed and then reopened after", "clean up of comments helped a lot. Thanks to the moderation. I'm leaving", "favor of closing/deleting said question and down-votes against. **Edit:** Question 2 has now", "help. Please note that in a typical meta fashion, up-votes on this question", "of comments helped a lot. Thanks to the moderation. I'm leaving this question", "then reopened after edits. And a major clean up of comments helped a", "content and youtube-quality comments war. We failed to close this one soon enough:", "being closed and then reopened after edits. And a major clean up of", "this question up for a more general consensus discussion about closing such questions.", "fashion, up-votes on this question mean in favor of closing/deleting said question and", "Thanks to the moderation. I'm leaving this question up for a more general", "but closing would already help. Please note that in a typical meta fashion,", "teach African Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643) Can we act swiftly on that one?: [What is the", "**Edit:** Question 2 has now being closed and then reopened after edits. And", "a lot. Thanks to the moderation. I'm leaving this question up for a", "\"Oh you're a professor? So you teach African Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643) Can we act swiftly", "against. **Edit:** Question 2 has now being closed and then reopened after edits.", "would already help. Please note that in a typical meta fashion, up-votes on", "up-votes on this question mean in favor of closing/deleting said question and down-votes", "that a question attracts only junk content and youtube-quality comments war. We failed", "in less than a week that a question attracts only junk content and", "soon enough: [If you're black, how do you answer \"Oh you're a professor?", "after edits. And a major clean up of comments helped a lot. Thanks", "junk content and youtube-quality comments war. We failed to close this one soon", "2 has now being closed and then reopened after edits. And a major", "black, how do you answer \"Oh you're a professor? So you teach African", "lot. Thanks to the moderation. I'm leaving this question up for a more", "that in a typical meta fashion, up-votes on this question mean in favor", "than a week that a question attracts only junk content and youtube-quality comments", "comments helped a lot. Thanks to the moderation. I'm leaving this question up", "has now being closed and then reopened after edits. And a major clean", "of closing/deleting said question and down-votes against. **Edit:** Question 2 has now being", "closed and then reopened after edits. And a major clean up of comments", "a professor? So you teach African Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643) Can we act swiftly on that", "the purpose of women-only meetings, panels, conferences, etc. in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643) Deletion would be", "major clean up of comments helped a lot. Thanks to the moderation. I'm", "closing/deleting said question and down-votes against. **Edit:** Question 2 has now being closed", "mean in favor of closing/deleting said question and down-votes against. **Edit:** Question 2", "moderation. I'm leaving this question up for a more general consensus discussion about", "answer \"Oh you're a professor? So you teach African Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643) Can we act", "that one?: [What is the purpose of women-only meetings, panels, conferences, etc. in", "be the best but closing would already help. Please note that in a", "question attracts only junk content and youtube-quality comments war. We failed to close", "best but closing would already help. Please note that in a typical meta", "leaving this question up for a more general consensus discussion about closing such", "conferences, etc. in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643) Deletion would be the best but closing would already", "how do you answer \"Oh you're a professor? So you teach African Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643)", "typical meta fashion, up-votes on this question mean in favor of closing/deleting said", "women-only meetings, panels, conferences, etc. in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643) Deletion would be the best but", "failed to close this one soon enough: [If you're black, how do you", "a week that a question attracts only junk content and youtube-quality comments war.", "a typical meta fashion, up-votes on this question mean in favor of closing/deleting", "purpose of women-only meetings, panels, conferences, etc. in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643) Deletion would be the", "the best but closing would already help. Please note that in a typical", "professor? So you teach African Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643) Can we act swiftly on that one?:", "Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643) Can we act swiftly on that one?: [What is the purpose of", "in a typical meta fashion, up-votes on this question mean in favor of", "African Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643) Can we act swiftly on that one?: [What is the purpose", "you answer \"Oh you're a professor? So you teach African Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643) Can we", "question mean in favor of closing/deleting said question and down-votes against. **Edit:** Question", "reopened after edits. And a major clean up of comments helped a lot.", "one?: [What is the purpose of women-only meetings, panels, conferences, etc. in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643)", "one soon enough: [If you're black, how do you answer \"Oh you're a", "attracts only junk content and youtube-quality comments war. We failed to close this", "a question attracts only junk content and youtube-quality comments war. We failed to", "act swiftly on that one?: [What is the purpose of women-only meetings, panels,", "So you teach African Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643) Can we act swiftly on that one?: [What", "swiftly on that one?: [What is the purpose of women-only meetings, panels, conferences,", "helped a lot. Thanks to the moderation. I'm leaving this question up for", "this one soon enough: [If you're black, how do you answer \"Oh you're", "you're a professor? So you teach African Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643) Can we act swiftly on", "already help. Please note that in a typical meta fashion, up-votes on this", "now being closed and then reopened after edits. And a major clean up", "the second time in less than a week that a question attracts only", "Can we act swiftly on that one?: [What is the purpose of women-only", "you teach African Studies?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77024/10643) Can we act swiftly on that one?: [What is", "less than a week that a question attracts only junk content and youtube-quality", "enough: [If you're black, how do you answer \"Oh you're a professor? So", "week that a question attracts only junk content and youtube-quality comments war. We", "said question and down-votes against. **Edit:** Question 2 has now being closed and", "Deletion would be the best but closing would already help. Please note that", "the moderation. I'm leaving this question up for a more general consensus discussion", "would be the best but closing would already help. Please note that in", "question and down-votes against. **Edit:** Question 2 has now being closed and then", "time in less than a week that a question attracts only junk content", "and down-votes against. **Edit:** Question 2 has now being closed and then reopened", "We failed to close this one soon enough: [If you're black, how do", "academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643) Deletion would be the best but closing would already help. Please note", "closing would already help. Please note that in a typical meta fashion, up-votes", "only junk content and youtube-quality comments war. We failed to close this one", "Please note that in a typical meta fashion, up-votes on this question mean", "and then reopened after edits. And a major clean up of comments helped", "on this question mean in favor of closing/deleting said question and down-votes against.", "up of comments helped a lot. Thanks to the moderation. I'm leaving this", "[If you're black, how do you answer \"Oh you're a professor? So you", "on that one?: [What is the purpose of women-only meetings, panels, conferences, etc.", "second time in less than a week that a question attracts only junk", "panels, conferences, etc. in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643) Deletion would be the best but closing would", "meetings, panels, conferences, etc. in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643) Deletion would be the best but closing", "in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/77123/10643) Deletion would be the best but closing would already help. Please", "to the moderation. I'm leaving this question up for a more general consensus", "you're black, how do you answer \"Oh you're a professor? So you teach", "close this one soon enough: [If you're black, how do you answer \"Oh", "and youtube-quality comments war. We failed to close this one soon enough: [If", "meta fashion, up-votes on this question mean in favor of closing/deleting said question", "I'm leaving this question up for a more general consensus discussion about closing" ]
[ "from other countries because 'hey the companies there are rich enough and it's", "a custom flag saying that we can't condone the use of cracked software,", "a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695) I know we aren't the licence police, but", "people it's ok to crack software from other countries because 'hey the companies", "So... what? We are going to tell people it's ok to crack software", "him to use the cracked software despite the fact that it's illegal and", "of the more highly upvoted answers encourages him to use the cracked software", "which China is party too cracking Mathmatica there is illigal. That's not at", "has said it makes him feel morally uncomfortable. I flagged with a custom", "said it makes him feel morally uncomfortable. I flagged with a custom flag", "***is*** against the law;' which is basically the stance taken in the answer?", "he knows it's illegal. One of the more highly upvoted answers encourages him", "that we can't condone the use of cracked software, but my response was", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/76733/6526> presents the problem where the OP has a problem with his teacher", "telling him to crack software despite the fact that he knows it's illegal.", "We are going to tell people it's ok to crack software from other", "software, but my response was - `declined - flags should only be used", "saying that we can't condone the use of cracked software, but my response", "find this highly troubling. --- Note I don't think this is a dupe", "knows it's illegal. One of the more highly upvoted answers encourages him to", "use of cracked software, but my response was - `declined - flags should", "it. Also I think not a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive), accourding to international", "the law;' which is basically the stance taken in the answer? As a", "software despite the fact that it's illegal and the user has said it", "to crack software is, I think, far different from trying to police someone", "dev I find this highly troubling. --- Note I don't think this is", "know we aren't the licence police, but at the same time actively encouraging", "even though it ***is*** against the law;' which is basically the stance taken", "make moderators aware of content that requires their intervention` So... what? We are", "countries because 'hey the companies there are rich enough and it's not a", "I don't think this is a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695) I know we", "there are rich enough and it's not a big deal here cause... culture,", "*hasn't* already cracked software to crack software is, I think, far different from", "tell people it's ok to crack software from other countries because 'hey the", "companies there are rich enough and it's not a big deal here cause...", "the licence police, but at the same time actively encouraging someone who *hasn't*", "already has done it. Also I think not a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive),", "is, I think, far different from trying to police someone who already has", "my response was - `declined - flags should only be used to make", "with his teacher telling him to crack software despite the fact that he", "Also I think not a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive), accourding to international treaty", "their intervention` So... what? We are going to tell people it's ok to", "what? We are going to tell people it's ok to crack software from", "ok to crack software from other countries because 'hey the companies there are", "troubling. --- Note I don't think this is a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695)", "response was - `declined - flags should only be used to make moderators", "One of the more highly upvoted answers encourages him to use the cracked", "despite the fact that it's illegal and the user has said it makes", "police someone who already has done it. Also I think not a dupe", "encourages him to use the cracked software despite the fact that it's illegal", "crack software from other countries because 'hey the companies there are rich enough", "cracked software, but my response was - `declined - flags should only be", "are rich enough and it's not a big deal here cause... culture, even", "it ***is*** against the law;' which is basically the stance taken in the", "encouraging someone who *hasn't* already cracked software to crack software is, I think,", "different from trying to police someone who already has done it. Also I", "basically the stance taken in the answer? As a software dev I find", "answer? As a software dev I find this highly troubling. --- Note I", "use the cracked software despite the fact that it's illegal and the user", "the use of cracked software, but my response was - `declined - flags", "trying to police someone who already has done it. Also I think not", "cracked software to crack software is, I think, far different from trying to", "morally uncomfortable. I flagged with a custom flag saying that we can't condone", "user has said it makes him feel morally uncomfortable. I flagged with a", "someone who *hasn't* already cracked software to crack software is, I think, far", "feel morally uncomfortable. I flagged with a custom flag saying that we can't", "to crack software from other countries because 'hey the companies there are rich", "has a problem with his teacher telling him to crack software despite the", "should only be used to make moderators aware of content that requires their", "the fact that it's illegal and the user has said it makes him", "software is, I think, far different from trying to police someone who already", "I find this highly troubling. --- Note I don't think this is a", "it's illegal and the user has said it makes him feel morally uncomfortable.", "the cracked software despite the fact that it's illegal and the user has", "fact that it's illegal and the user has said it makes him feel", "with a custom flag saying that we can't condone the use of cracked", "to make moderators aware of content that requires their intervention` So... what? We", "who *hasn't* already cracked software to crack software is, I think, far different", "time actively encouraging someone who *hasn't* already cracked software to crack software is,", "presents the problem where the OP has a problem with his teacher telling", "don't think this is a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695) I know we aren't", "we aren't the licence police, but at the same time actively encouraging someone", "which is basically the stance taken in the answer? As a software dev", "and it's not a big deal here cause... culture, even though it ***is***", "question <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/76733/6526> presents the problem where the OP has a problem with his", "despite the fact that he knows it's illegal. One of the more highly", "here cause... culture, even though it ***is*** against the law;' which is basically", "China is party too cracking Mathmatica there is illigal. That's not at question", "that he knows it's illegal. One of the more highly upvoted answers encourages", "teacher telling him to crack software despite the fact that he knows it's", "the user has said it makes him feel morally uncomfortable. I flagged with", "software from other countries because 'hey the companies there are rich enough and", "at the same time actively encouraging someone who *hasn't* already cracked software to", "flags should only be used to make moderators aware of content that requires", "this is a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695) I know we aren't the licence", "software to crack software is, I think, far different from trying to police", "cause... culture, even though it ***is*** against the law;' which is basically the", "question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695) I know we aren't the licence police, but at the same time", "is a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695) I know we aren't the licence police,", "him to crack software despite the fact that he knows it's illegal. One", "`declined - flags should only be used to make moderators aware of content", "accourding to international treaty which China is party too cracking Mathmatica there is", "cracked software despite the fact that it's illegal and the user has said", "far different from trying to police someone who already has done it. Also", "illegal. One of the more highly upvoted answers encourages him to use the", "- `declined - flags should only be used to make moderators aware of", "crack software despite the fact that he knows it's illegal. One of the", "intervention` So... what? We are going to tell people it's ok to crack", "of cracked software, but my response was - `declined - flags should only", "[this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive), accourding to international treaty which China is party too cracking Mathmatica", "problem with his teacher telling him to crack software despite the fact that", "culture, even though it ***is*** against the law;' which is basically the stance", "big deal here cause... culture, even though it ***is*** against the law;' which", "custom flag saying that we can't condone the use of cracked software, but", "OP has a problem with his teacher telling him to crack software despite", "law;' which is basically the stance taken in the answer? As a software", "of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695) I know we aren't the licence police, but at the", "the stance taken in the answer? As a software dev I find this", "can't condone the use of cracked software, but my response was - `declined", "aware of content that requires their intervention` So... what? We are going to", "not a big deal here cause... culture, even though it ***is*** against the", "more highly upvoted answers encourages him to use the cracked software despite the", "I flagged with a custom flag saying that we can't condone the use", "fact that he knows it's illegal. One of the more highly upvoted answers", "in the answer? As a software dev I find this highly troubling. ---", "the answer? As a software dev I find this highly troubling. --- Note", "--- Note I don't think this is a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695) I", "from trying to police someone who already has done it. Also I think", "the fact that he knows it's illegal. One of the more highly upvoted", "'hey the companies there are rich enough and it's not a big deal", "As a software dev I find this highly troubling. --- Note I don't", "upvoted answers encourages him to use the cracked software despite the fact that", "stance taken in the answer? As a software dev I find this highly", "the more highly upvoted answers encourages him to use the cracked software despite", "- flags should only be used to make moderators aware of content that", "software dev I find this highly troubling. --- Note I don't think this", "who already has done it. Also I think not a dupe of [this", "a software dev I find this highly troubling. --- Note I don't think", "only be used to make moderators aware of content that requires their intervention`", "uncomfortable. I flagged with a custom flag saying that we can't condone the", "treaty which China is party too cracking Mathmatica there is illigal. That's not", "other countries because 'hey the companies there are rich enough and it's not", "flag saying that we can't condone the use of cracked software, but my", "question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive), accourding to international treaty which China is party too cracking Mathmatica there", "deal here cause... culture, even though it ***is*** against the law;' which is", "police, but at the same time actively encouraging someone who *hasn't* already cracked", "This question <https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/76733/6526> presents the problem where the OP has a problem with", "the companies there are rich enough and it's not a big deal here", "not a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive), accourding to international treaty which China is", "same time actively encouraging someone who *hasn't* already cracked software to crack software", "to use the cracked software despite the fact that it's illegal and the", "highly upvoted answers encourages him to use the cracked software despite the fact", "his teacher telling him to crack software despite the fact that he knows", "I think not a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive), accourding to international treaty which", "it makes him feel morally uncomfortable. I flagged with a custom flag saying", "highly troubling. --- Note I don't think this is a dupe of [this", "I think, far different from trying to police someone who already has done", "him feel morally uncomfortable. I flagged with a custom flag saying that we", "is party too cracking Mathmatica there is illigal. That's not at question here.", "makes him feel morally uncomfortable. I flagged with a custom flag saying that", "we can't condone the use of cracked software, but my response was -", "against the law;' which is basically the stance taken in the answer? As", "already cracked software to crack software is, I think, far different from trying", "I know we aren't the licence police, but at the same time actively", "that requires their intervention` So... what? We are going to tell people it's", "think not a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive), accourding to international treaty which China", "rich enough and it's not a big deal here cause... culture, even though", "a big deal here cause... culture, even though it ***is*** against the law;'", "licence police, but at the same time actively encouraging someone who *hasn't* already", "of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive), accourding to international treaty which China is party too cracking", "because 'hey the companies there are rich enough and it's not a big", "taken in the answer? As a software dev I find this highly troubling.", "flagged with a custom flag saying that we can't condone the use of", "is basically the stance taken in the answer? As a software dev I", "a problem with his teacher telling him to crack software despite the fact", "to crack software despite the fact that he knows it's illegal. One of", "dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695) I know we aren't the licence police, but at", "it's ok to crack software from other countries because 'hey the companies there", "a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive), accourding to international treaty which China is party", "dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive), accourding to international treaty which China is party too", "but my response was - `declined - flags should only be used to", "to tell people it's ok to crack software from other countries because 'hey", "illegal and the user has said it makes him feel morally uncomfortable. I", "be used to make moderators aware of content that requires their intervention` So...", "it's not a big deal here cause... culture, even though it ***is*** against", "and the user has said it makes him feel morally uncomfortable. I flagged", "crack software is, I think, far different from trying to police someone who", "that it's illegal and the user has said it makes him feel morally", "problem where the OP has a problem with his teacher telling him to", "[this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695) I know we aren't the licence police, but at the same", "content that requires their intervention` So... what? We are going to tell people", "someone who already has done it. Also I think not a dupe of", "where the OP has a problem with his teacher telling him to crack", "though it ***is*** against the law;' which is basically the stance taken in", "actively encouraging someone who *hasn't* already cracked software to crack software is, I", "moderators aware of content that requires their intervention` So... what? We are going", "are going to tell people it's ok to crack software from other countries", "international treaty which China is party too cracking Mathmatica there is illigal. That's", "of content that requires their intervention` So... what? We are going to tell", "condone the use of cracked software, but my response was - `declined -", "answers encourages him to use the cracked software despite the fact that it's", "the same time actively encouraging someone who *hasn't* already cracked software to crack", "aren't the licence police, but at the same time actively encouraging someone who", "to international treaty which China is party too cracking Mathmatica there is illigal.", "used to make moderators aware of content that requires their intervention` So... what?", "done it. Also I think not a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive), accourding to", "think this is a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695) I know we aren't the", "has done it. Also I think not a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8492/should-an-answer-that-encourages-illegal-activity-be-marked-as-offensive), accourding", "requires their intervention` So... what? We are going to tell people it's ok", "to police someone who already has done it. Also I think not a", "enough and it's not a big deal here cause... culture, even though it", "the OP has a problem with his teacher telling him to crack software", "software despite the fact that he knows it's illegal. One of the more", "think, far different from trying to police someone who already has done it.", "was - `declined - flags should only be used to make moderators aware", "but at the same time actively encouraging someone who *hasn't* already cracked software", "this highly troubling. --- Note I don't think this is a dupe of", "Note I don't think this is a dupe of [this question](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/127892/181695) I know", "going to tell people it's ok to crack software from other countries because", "it's illegal. One of the more highly upvoted answers encourages him to use", "the problem where the OP has a problem with his teacher telling him" ]
[ "against herself (that's what I have to assume) is a different matter. Is", "comments are 'ephemeral' by nature. But a moderator deleting criticism against herself (that's", "of this site? For me, this is the clearest possible abuse of moderator", "I have to assume) is a different matter. Is this acceptable behavior for", "moderator of this site? For me, this is the clearest possible abuse of", "selectively moving comments to chat. My comment was in no way impolite and", "answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77123/what-is-the-purpose-of-women-only-meetings-panels-conferences-etc-in-academi) questioning moderator ff524's behavior of selectively moving comments to", "it raised a good point. Now it is entirely gone (not just moved", "have to assume) is a different matter. Is this acceptable behavior for a", "for a moderator of this site? For me, this is the clearest possible", "way impolite and I think it raised a good point. Now it is", "moderator deleting criticism against herself (that's what I have to assume) is a", "assume) is a different matter. Is this acceptable behavior for a moderator of", "matter. Is this acceptable behavior for a moderator of this site? For me,", "comment was in no way impolite and I think it raised a good", "abuse of moderator powers, although I don't quite understand the motivation behind it.", "a moderator deleting criticism against herself (that's what I have to assume) is", "of selectively moving comments to chat. My comment was in no way impolite", "site? For me, this is the clearest possible abuse of moderator powers, although", "impolite and I think it raised a good point. Now it is entirely", "herself (that's what I have to assume) is a different matter. Is this", "entirely gone (not just moved to chat). It has often been said that", "often been said that comments are 'ephemeral' by nature. But a moderator deleting", "behavior for a moderator of this site? For me, this is the clearest", "this is the clearest possible abuse of moderator powers, although I don't quite", "said that comments are 'ephemeral' by nature. But a moderator deleting criticism against", "I posted a comment on an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77123/what-is-the-purpose-of-women-only-meetings-panels-conferences-etc-in-academi) questioning moderator ff524's", "just moved to chat). It has often been said that comments are 'ephemeral'", "questioning moderator ff524's behavior of selectively moving comments to chat. My comment was", "is the clearest possible abuse of moderator powers, although I don't quite understand", "and I think it raised a good point. Now it is entirely gone", "this site? For me, this is the clearest possible abuse of moderator powers,", "by nature. But a moderator deleting criticism against herself (that's what I have", "that comments are 'ephemeral' by nature. But a moderator deleting criticism against herself", "is a different matter. Is this acceptable behavior for a moderator of this", "moderator ff524's behavior of selectively moving comments to chat. My comment was in", "My comment was in no way impolite and I think it raised a", "good point. Now it is entirely gone (not just moved to chat). It", "'ephemeral' by nature. But a moderator deleting criticism against herself (that's what I", "to assume) is a different matter. Is this acceptable behavior for a moderator", "I think it raised a good point. Now it is entirely gone (not", "it is entirely gone (not just moved to chat). It has often been", "comment on an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77123/what-is-the-purpose-of-women-only-meetings-panels-conferences-etc-in-academi) questioning moderator ff524's behavior of selectively", "to chat. My comment was in no way impolite and I think it", "comments to chat. My comment was in no way impolite and I think", "moving comments to chat. My comment was in no way impolite and I", "nature. But a moderator deleting criticism against herself (that's what I have to", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77123/what-is-the-purpose-of-women-only-meetings-panels-conferences-etc-in-academi) questioning moderator ff524's behavior of selectively moving comments to chat. My", "behavior of selectively moving comments to chat. My comment was in no way", "chat. My comment was in no way impolite and I think it raised", "think it raised a good point. Now it is entirely gone (not just", "a different matter. Is this acceptable behavior for a moderator of this site?", "has often been said that comments are 'ephemeral' by nature. But a moderator", "the clearest possible abuse of moderator powers, although I don't quite understand the", "an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77123/what-is-the-purpose-of-women-only-meetings-panels-conferences-etc-in-academi) questioning moderator ff524's behavior of selectively moving comments", "this acceptable behavior for a moderator of this site? For me, this is", "was in no way impolite and I think it raised a good point.", "a good point. Now it is entirely gone (not just moved to chat).", "(that's what I have to assume) is a different matter. Is this acceptable", "are 'ephemeral' by nature. But a moderator deleting criticism against herself (that's what", "a moderator of this site? For me, this is the clearest possible abuse", "a comment on an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77123/what-is-the-purpose-of-women-only-meetings-panels-conferences-etc-in-academi) questioning moderator ff524's behavior of", "posted a comment on an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77123/what-is-the-purpose-of-women-only-meetings-panels-conferences-etc-in-academi) questioning moderator ff524's behavior", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77123/what-is-the-purpose-of-women-only-meetings-panels-conferences-etc-in-academi) questioning moderator ff524's behavior of selectively moving comments to chat. My comment", "But a moderator deleting criticism against herself (that's what I have to assume)", "clearest possible abuse of moderator powers, although I don't quite understand the motivation", "moved to chat). It has often been said that comments are 'ephemeral' by", "on an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77123/what-is-the-purpose-of-women-only-meetings-panels-conferences-etc-in-academi) questioning moderator ff524's behavior of selectively moving", "me, this is the clearest possible abuse of moderator powers, although I don't", "deleting criticism against herself (that's what I have to assume) is a different", "ff524's behavior of selectively moving comments to chat. My comment was in no", "gone (not just moved to chat). It has often been said that comments", "to chat). It has often been said that comments are 'ephemeral' by nature.", "raised a good point. Now it is entirely gone (not just moved to", "what I have to assume) is a different matter. Is this acceptable behavior", "Now it is entirely gone (not just moved to chat). It has often", "different matter. Is this acceptable behavior for a moderator of this site? For", "chat). It has often been said that comments are 'ephemeral' by nature. But", "Yesterday I posted a comment on an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77123/what-is-the-purpose-of-women-only-meetings-panels-conferences-etc-in-academi) questioning moderator", "It has often been said that comments are 'ephemeral' by nature. But a", "(not just moved to chat). It has often been said that comments are", "been said that comments are 'ephemeral' by nature. But a moderator deleting criticism", "no way impolite and I think it raised a good point. Now it", "is entirely gone (not just moved to chat). It has often been said", "For me, this is the clearest possible abuse of moderator powers, although I", "in no way impolite and I think it raised a good point. Now", "criticism against herself (that's what I have to assume) is a different matter.", "Is this acceptable behavior for a moderator of this site? For me, this", "possible abuse of moderator powers, although I don't quite understand the motivation behind", "to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/77123/what-is-the-purpose-of-women-only-meetings-panels-conferences-etc-in-academi) questioning moderator ff524's behavior of selectively moving comments to chat.", "acceptable behavior for a moderator of this site? For me, this is the", "point. Now it is entirely gone (not just moved to chat). It has" ]
[ "that the behavior is inappropriate, and in some questions this is a premature", "\"misconduct\" already implies a judgment that the behavior is inappropriate, and in some", "some questions this is a premature conclusion; for instance, the question may be", "follows from an exchange with user @ff524 in the comments to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services).", "[sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") -> [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\"), out of", "too broad, and we need a tag for this concept. * I agreed", "the comments to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services). TL;DR: * The question was initially tagged [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct", "instance, the question may be \\*Is doing X OK?\". This proposal follows from", "it for a while, I now think that this proposal is the best", "tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") -> [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\"), out of this concern. *", "tagged 'sexual-conduct'\"), with a redirect. This is because \"misconduct\" already implies a judgment", "'sexual-conduct'\"), with a redirect. This is because \"misconduct\" already implies a judgment that", "tagged 'sexual-sphere'\") is ambiguous and too broad, and we need a tag for", "explicit in the tag wiki for [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") that no", "is inappropriate, and in some questions this is a premature conclusion; for instance,", "and we need a tag for this concept. * I agreed with her", "question [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") -> [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\"), out", "tagged 'sexual-sphere'\"), out of this concern. * She reverted the change arguing that", "conclusion; for instance, the question may be \\*Is doing X OK?\". This proposal", "also suggested making it explicit in the tag wiki for [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions", "is implied. We have now edited the wiki. After pondering on it for", "behavior is inappropriate, and in some questions this is a premature conclusion; for", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services). TL;DR: * The question was initially tagged [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged", "a while, I now think that this proposal is the best course of", "questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") -> [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\"), out of this concern.", "for [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") that no judgment is implied. We have", "and too broad, and we need a tag for this concept. * I", "while, I now think that this proposal is the best course of action.", "for instance, the question may be \\*Is doing X OK?\". This proposal follows", "\"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\") is ambiguous and too broad, and we need a", "concern. * She reverted the change arguing that [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\")", "arguing that [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\") is ambiguous and too broad, and", "change arguing that [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\") is ambiguous and too broad,", "We have now edited the wiki. After pondering on it for a while,", "tag [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") to [sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-conduct'\"), with", "her thought, but I also suggested making it explicit in the tag wiki", "because \"misconduct\" already implies a judgment that the behavior is inappropriate, and in", "She reverted the change arguing that [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\") is ambiguous", "edited the wiki. After pondering on it for a while, I now think", "making it explicit in the tag wiki for [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\")", "judgment that the behavior is inappropriate, and in some questions this is a", "with her thought, but I also suggested making it explicit in the tag", "but I also suggested making it explicit in the tag wiki for [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct", "already implies a judgment that the behavior is inappropriate, and in some questions", "[sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-conduct'\"), with a redirect. This is because \"misconduct\" already", "initially tagged [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") * I initially retagged the question", "of this concern. * She reverted the change arguing that [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions", "tag for this concept. * I agreed with her thought, but I also", "wiki for [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") that no judgment is implied. We", "'sexual-misconduct'\") that no judgment is implied. We have now edited the wiki. After", "it explicit in the tag wiki for [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") that", "* I agreed with her thought, but I also suggested making it explicit", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services). TL;DR: * The question was initially tagged [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\")", "in some questions this is a premature conclusion; for instance, the question may", "\"show questions tagged 'sexual-conduct'\"), with a redirect. This is because \"misconduct\" already implies", "After pondering on it for a while, I now think that this proposal", "questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\"), out of this concern. * She reverted the change arguing", "X OK?\". This proposal follows from an exchange with user @ff524 in the", "an exchange with user @ff524 in the comments to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services). TL;DR: *", "for a while, I now think that this proposal is the best course", "\"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") to [sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-conduct'\"), with a redirect.", "tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") * I initially retagged the question [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\")", "broad, and we need a tag for this concept. * I agreed with", "retagged the question [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") -> [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged", "in the tag wiki for [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") that no judgment", "'sexual-misconduct'\") -> [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\"), out of this concern. * She", "'sexual-sphere'\") is ambiguous and too broad, and we need a tag for this", "initially retagged the question [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") -> [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions", "redirect. This is because \"misconduct\" already implies a judgment that the behavior is", "user @ff524 in the comments to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services). TL;DR: * The question was", "may be \\*Is doing X OK?\". This proposal follows from an exchange with", "a judgment that the behavior is inappropriate, and in some questions this is", "the question may be \\*Is doing X OK?\". This proposal follows from an", "out of this concern. * She reverted the change arguing that [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show", "that no judgment is implied. We have now edited the wiki. After pondering", "tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") to [sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-conduct'\"), with a redirect. This is", "\\*Is doing X OK?\". This proposal follows from an exchange with user @ff524", "the change arguing that [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\") is ambiguous and too", "in the comments to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services). TL;DR: * The question was initially tagged", "be \\*Is doing X OK?\". This proposal follows from an exchange with user", "is because \"misconduct\" already implies a judgment that the behavior is inappropriate, and", "questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") * I initially retagged the question [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged", "concept. * I agreed with her thought, but I also suggested making it", "and in some questions this is a premature conclusion; for instance, the question", "this is a premature conclusion; for instance, the question may be \\*Is doing", "I initially retagged the question [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") -> [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show", "ambiguous and too broad, and we need a tag for this concept. *", "I agreed with her thought, but I also suggested making it explicit in", "tagged [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") * I initially retagged the question [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct", "this concept. * I agreed with her thought, but I also suggested making", "with a redirect. This is because \"misconduct\" already implies a judgment that the", "This is because \"misconduct\" already implies a judgment that the behavior is inappropriate,", "a tag for this concept. * I agreed with her thought, but I", "rename the tag [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") to [sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct \"show questions tagged", "'sexual-sphere'\"), out of this concern. * She reverted the change arguing that [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere", "agreed with her thought, but I also suggested making it explicit in the", "tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") that no judgment is implied. We have now edited the wiki.", "[sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") to [sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-conduct'\"), with a", "is ambiguous and too broad, and we need a tag for this concept.", "to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services). TL;DR: * The question was initially tagged [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions", "I propose to rename the tag [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") to [sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct", "questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") to [sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-conduct'\"), with a redirect. This", "proposal follows from an exchange with user @ff524 in the comments to [this", "the tag wiki for [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") that no judgment is", "question may be \\*Is doing X OK?\". This proposal follows from an exchange", "[sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\") is ambiguous and too broad, and we need", "* I initially retagged the question [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") -> [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere", "propose to rename the tag [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") to [sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct \"show", "from an exchange with user @ff524 in the comments to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services). TL;DR:", "have now edited the wiki. After pondering on it for a while, I", "the wiki. After pondering on it for a while, I now think that", "\"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") * I initially retagged the question [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions", "exchange with user @ff524 in the comments to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services). TL;DR: * The", "was initially tagged [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") * I initially retagged the", "to [sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-conduct'\"), with a redirect. This is because \"misconduct\"", "pondering on it for a while, I now think that this proposal is", "[sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") * I initially retagged the question [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show", "to rename the tag [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") to [sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct \"show questions", "inappropriate, and in some questions this is a premature conclusion; for instance, the", "I also suggested making it explicit in the tag wiki for [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show", "\"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\"), out of this concern. * She reverted the change", "a redirect. This is because \"misconduct\" already implies a judgment that the behavior", "questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\") is ambiguous and too broad, and we need a tag", "reverted the change arguing that [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\") is ambiguous and", "\"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") that no judgment is implied. We have now edited", "judgment is implied. We have now edited the wiki. After pondering on it", "a premature conclusion; for instance, the question may be \\*Is doing X OK?\".", "questions tagged 'sexual-conduct'\"), with a redirect. This is because \"misconduct\" already implies a", "this concern. * She reverted the change arguing that [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged", "premature conclusion; for instance, the question may be \\*Is doing X OK?\". This", "suggested making it explicit in the tag wiki for [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged", "with user @ff524 in the comments to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services). TL;DR: * The question", "@ff524 in the comments to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services). TL;DR: * The question was initially", "\"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") -> [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\"), out of this", "on it for a while, I now think that this proposal is the", "* She reverted the change arguing that [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\") is", "This proposal follows from an exchange with user @ff524 in the comments to", "-> [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\"), out of this concern. * She reverted", "doing X OK?\". This proposal follows from an exchange with user @ff524 in", "'sexual-misconduct'\") * I initially retagged the question [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") ->", "[sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\"), out of this concern. * She reverted the", "* The question was initially tagged [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") * I", "question was initially tagged [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") * I initially retagged", "'sexual-misconduct'\") to [sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-conduct'\"), with a redirect. This is because", "we need a tag for this concept. * I agreed with her thought,", "is a premature conclusion; for instance, the question may be \\*Is doing X", "TL;DR: * The question was initially tagged [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") *", "implies a judgment that the behavior is inappropriate, and in some questions this", "the question [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") -> [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\"),", "need a tag for this concept. * I agreed with her thought, but", "now edited the wiki. After pondering on it for a while, I now", "implied. We have now edited the wiki. After pondering on it for a", "wiki. After pondering on it for a while, I now think that this", "[sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") that no judgment is implied. We have now", "for this concept. * I agreed with her thought, but I also suggested", "comments to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8194/sex-worker-student-offering-her-legal-services). TL;DR: * The question was initially tagged [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show", "OK?\". This proposal follows from an exchange with user @ff524 in the comments", "thought, but I also suggested making it explicit in the tag wiki for", "tag wiki for [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") that no judgment is implied.", "the tag [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") to [sexual-conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-conduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-conduct'\"),", "the behavior is inappropriate, and in some questions this is a premature conclusion;", "that [sexual-sphere](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-sphere \"show questions tagged 'sexual-sphere'\") is ambiguous and too broad, and we", "questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") that no judgment is implied. We have now edited the", "The question was initially tagged [sexual-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/sexual-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'sexual-misconduct'\") * I initially", "questions this is a premature conclusion; for instance, the question may be \\*Is", "no judgment is implied. We have now edited the wiki. After pondering on" ]
[ "that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing", "has approached the moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our", "community members has approached the moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun usage", "or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the quality of the", "quality of the discussion. As such, I wanted to ask the community on", "behalf of this member... **should we, as a community, discourage the use of", "discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the", "this member... **should we, as a community, discourage the use of gendered pronouns", "the community members has approached the moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun", "approached the moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia", "gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling", "\"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the quality", "commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the quality of the discussion. As such,", "on behalf of this member... **should we, as a community, discourage the use", "and may affect the quality of the discussion. As such, I wanted to", "gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may", "concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt", "usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling out gender", "of this member... **should we, as a community, discourage the use of gendered", "calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias", "a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual", "Specifically, this individual felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or", "to ask the community on behalf of this member... **should we, as a", "wanted to ask the community on behalf of this member... **should we, as", "this individual felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as", "discussion. As such, I wanted to ask the community on behalf of this", "the discussion. As such, I wanted to ask the community on behalf of", "members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\"", "pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling out", "of the discussion. As such, I wanted to ask the community on behalf", "with a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this", "of the community members has approached the moderators with a concern about gendered", "amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling out gender in", "about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that", "the moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members.", "members has approached the moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst", "said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the quality of", "bias and may affect the quality of the discussion. As such, I wanted", "in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect", "affect the quality of the discussion. As such, I wanted to ask the", "moderators with a concern about gendered pronoun usage amongst our Academia members. Specifically,", "such, I wanted to ask the community on behalf of this member... **should", "I wanted to ask the community on behalf of this member... **should we,", "she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the quality of the discussion. As", "introducing bias and may affect the quality of the discussion. As such, I", "out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and", "felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she commented…\"—risks", "the community on behalf of this member... **should we, as a community, discourage", "Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he", "**should we, as a community, discourage the use of gendered pronouns in discussion?**", "the quality of the discussion. As such, I wanted to ask the community", "community on behalf of this member... **should we, as a community, discourage the", "individual felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g., \"he said…\" or \"as she", "\"as she commented…\"—risks introducing bias and may affect the quality of the discussion.", "member... **should we, as a community, discourage the use of gendered pronouns in", "our Academia members. Specifically, this individual felt that calling out gender in discussion—e.g.,", "may affect the quality of the discussion. As such, I wanted to ask", "As such, I wanted to ask the community on behalf of this member...", "One of the community members has approached the moderators with a concern about", "ask the community on behalf of this member... **should we, as a community," ]