Split (1)

train · 10.4M rows

ngram listlengths 0 10.5k
[ "mutual mod have some insights on this? • [Should we be more welcoming", "evaluation, not using them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as it", "to considered important by the community, but none of the answers have received", "I've seen another question that is purely technical issue and is well-received: [Is", "audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So what do you think? --- Related: •", "• Case in point: [Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design.", "authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions", "creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So what do", "well-received: [Is there a way to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically", "the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white? If", "Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't want questions about LaTeX or", "Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as it seems to considered important by the", "But I've seen another question that is purely technical issue and is well-received:", "other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't want questions", "there a way to change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to", "them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as it seems to considered", "[Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual", "LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So", "no, what about the questions about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or", "beloved mutual mod have some insights on this? • [Should we be more", "Featuring this question, as it seems to considered important by the community, but", "entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions", "Perhaps the close voters think that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've", "black or white? If yes, should questions about other services like Academia.edu or", "the questions about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be", "important by the community, but none of the answers have received sufficiently many", "there a way to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions", "to change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and I", "to closed and I suspect the reason is that it's a technical question.", "I suspect the reason is that it's a technical question. Perhaps the close", "What should we do with questions about preprint services? Are they academical enough?", "think? --- Related: • Case in point: [Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474)", "about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or", "[Is there a way to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical", "mod have some insights on this? • [Should we be more welcoming of", "The question [Is there a way to change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341)", "tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do", "our beloved mutual mod have some insights on this? • [Should we be", "change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and I suspect", "the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod", "> > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as it seems to considered important", "to be considered a consensus. Please consider voting on the answers or posting", "enough? If no, what about the questions about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341),", "Please consider voting on the answers or posting an answer of your own.", "voting on the answers or posting an answer of your own. > >", "is well-received: [Is there a way to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And", "we do with questions about preprint services? Are they academical enough? If no,", "the close voters think that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen", "about evaluation, not using them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as", "questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with questions about preprint services? Are", "this? • [Should we be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about", "So what do you think? --- Related: • Case in point: [Drawing the", "using them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as it seems to", "questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not using", "tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with questions about preprint services? Are they", "services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't want questions about", "or creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So what", "follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus", "technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some", "questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of", "and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with", "be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design. • [What", "commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not using them. > > Moderator’s", "notice: Featuring this question, as it seems to considered important by the community,", "community, but none of the answers have received sufficiently many votes to be", "OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and I suspect the reason is that", "on-topic? And surely we don't want questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF of", "question that is purely technical issue and is well-received: [Is there a way", "the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show", "system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and I suspect the reason is that it's", "But it's about study design. • [What to do with questions asking to", "way to change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and", "[What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's", "better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question that is purely technical", "or white? If yes, should questions about other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate", "don't want questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to", "we be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design. •", "should be black or white? If yes, should questions about other services like", "have received sufficiently many votes to be considered a consensus. Please consider voting", "asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not using them.", "Are they academical enough? If no, what about the questions about whether the", "study design. • [What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online", "of the answers have received sufficiently many votes to be considered a consensus.", "many votes to be considered a consensus. Please consider voting on the answers", "question [Is there a way to change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is", "a way to change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed", "voters think that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question", "[reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with questions about preprint", "we don't want questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341)", "Related: • Case in point: [Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic", "services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not using them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring", "some insights on this? • [Should we be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341)", "with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not", "the answers have received sufficiently many votes to be considered a consensus. Please", "questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What", "you think? --- Related: • Case in point: [Drawing the line for tech", "that it's a technical question. Perhaps the close voters think that it's better", "welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design. • [What to do", "tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should", "to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill the entire", "about preprint services? Are they academical enough? If no, what about the questions", "in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod have some insights on this?", "insights on this? • [Should we be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But", "should we do with questions about preprint services? Are they academical enough? If", "be considered a consensus. Please consider voting on the answers or posting an", "questions about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black", "[Is there a way to change preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about", "basically technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and", "of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white? If yes, should", "about study design. • [What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial", "this question, as it seems to considered important by the community, but none", "and is well-received: [Is there a way to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341).", "consensus. Please consider voting on the answers or posting an answer of your", "seen another question that is purely technical issue and is well-received: [Is there", "white? If yes, should questions about other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic?", "Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod have some insights on this? •", "of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design. • [What to do with", "preprint service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and I suspect the", "a consensus. Please consider voting on the answers or posting an answer of", "\"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with questions about preprint services?", "considered a consensus. Please consider voting on the answers or posting an answer", "right? So what do you think? --- Related: • Case in point: [Drawing", "about LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right?", "[Should we be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design.", "the community, but none of the answers have received sufficiently many votes to", "\"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\").", "or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white? If yes, should questions about other", "what do you think? --- Related: • Case in point: [Drawing the line", "to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about", "with questions about preprint services? Are they academical enough? If no, what about", "of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So what do you think?", "questions about preprint services? Are they academical enough? If no, what about the", "preprint services? Are they academical enough? If no, what about the questions about", "question. Perhaps the close voters think that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But", "design. • [What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341)", "But it's about evaluation, not using them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this", "it seems to considered important by the community, but none of the answers", "particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show", "on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged", "> Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as it seems to considered important by", "by the community, but none of the answers have received sufficiently many votes", "'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we", "online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not using them. > > Moderator’s notice:", "it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question that is purely", "Maybe our beloved mutual mod have some insights on this? • [Should we", "closed and I suspect the reason is that it's a technical question. Perhaps", "have some insights on this? • [Should we be more welcoming of \"technical\"", "in point: [Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our", "the reason is that it's a technical question. Perhaps the close voters think", "And surely we don't want questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides", "should questions about other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we", "way to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill the", "received sufficiently many votes to be considered a consensus. Please consider voting on", "like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't want questions about LaTeX", "point: [Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved", "do you think? --- Related: • Case in point: [Drawing the line for", "Case in point: [Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe", "line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod have", "a way to follow particular authors on arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill", "• [What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But", "suspect the reason is that it's a technical question. Perhaps the close voters", "some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with questions", "--- Related: • Case in point: [Drawing the line for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in", "purely technical issue and is well-received: [Is there a way to follow particular", "slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So what do you think? ---", "on this? • [Should we be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's", "\"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design. • [What to do with questions", "Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question that is purely technical issue and is", "for tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod have some", "on the answers or posting an answer of your own. > > >", "more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design. • [What to", "whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white?", "with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So what do you think? --- Related:", "ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't want questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF", "arxiv?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/81831/14341). And basically technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\")", "about other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't want", "close voters think that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another", "want questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be", "[board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white? If yes, should questions about other services", "be here, right? So what do you think? --- Related: • Case in", "questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study design. • [What to do with questions asking", "[slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white? If yes, should questions", "it's about evaluation, not using them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question,", "And basically technical questions fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag,", "[CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white? If yes, should questions about", "be black or white? If yes, should questions about other services like Academia.edu", "that is purely technical issue and is well-received: [Is there a way to", "yes, should questions about other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely", "consider voting on the answers or posting an answer of your own. >", "to be here, right? So what do you think? --- Related: • Case", "questions about other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't", "another question that is purely technical issue and is well-received: [Is there a", "about to closed and I suspect the reason is that it's a technical", "[Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question that is purely technical issue and", "support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod have some insights on", "votes to be considered a consensus. Please consider voting on the answers or", "services? Are they academical enough? If no, what about the questions about whether", "is purely technical issue and is well-received: [Is there a way to follow", "technical issue and is well-received: [Is there a way to follow particular authors", "is about to closed and I suspect the reason is that it's a", "service within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and I suspect the reason", "on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question that is purely technical issue", "that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question that is", "what about the questions about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341)", "of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged 'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with questions about", "If yes, should questions about other services like Academia.edu or ResearchGate on-topic? And", "not using them. > > Moderator’s notice: Featuring this question, as it seems", "[scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers \"show questions tagged", "If no, what about the questions about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341)", "it's about study design. • [What to do with questions asking to evaluate", "do with questions about preprint services? Are they academical enough? If no, what", "none of the answers have received sufficiently many votes to be considered a", "color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should be black or white? If yes,", "evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not using them. > >", "a technical question. Perhaps the close voters think that it's better on [Web", "but none of the answers have received sufficiently many votes to be considered", "reason is that it's a technical question. Perhaps the close voters think that", "'reference-managers'\"). What should we do with questions about preprint services? Are they academical", "issue and is well-received: [Is there a way to follow particular authors on", "academical enough? If no, what about the questions about whether the color of", "they academical enough? If no, what about the questions about whether the color", "is that it's a technical question. Perhaps the close voters think that it's", "considered important by the community, but none of the answers have received sufficiently", "seems to considered important by the community, but none of the answers have", "to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation, not using them. >", "think that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/). But I've seen another question that", "here, right? So what do you think? --- Related: • Case in point:", "• [Should we be more welcoming of \"technical\" questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3631/14341) But it's about study", "questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here,", "as it seems to considered important by the community, but none of the", "answers have received sufficiently many votes to be considered a consensus. Please consider", "within OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is about to closed and I suspect the reason is", "and I suspect the reason is that it's a technical question. Perhaps the", "[PDF of slides with audio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2862/14341) to be here, right? So what do you", "fill the entire [scopus](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/scopus \"show questions tagged 'scopus'\") tag, and some of [reference-managers](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reference-managers", "or ResearchGate on-topic? And surely we don't want questions about LaTeX or creating", "about the questions about whether the color of [slideshow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/10354/14341), [CV](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/61277/14341) or [board](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109389/14341) should", "do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4062/14341) But it's about evaluation,", "technical question. Perhaps the close voters think that it's better on [Web Applications](https://webapps.stackexchange.com/).", "Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod have some insights on this? • [Should", "it's a technical question. Perhaps the close voters think that it's better on", "question, as it seems to considered important by the community, but none of", "surely we don't want questions about LaTeX or creating [PDF of slides with", "tech support](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3300/26474) in Graphic Design. Maybe our beloved mutual mod have some insights", "sufficiently many votes to be considered a consensus. **Please consider voting on the" ]
[ "about the lingerie joke made in an elevator was controversial leading to a", "made in an elevator was controversial leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The", "done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has not been positive. What is wrong with", "the initial reception has not been positive. What is wrong with the new", "leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be to ask", "but the initial reception has not been positive. What is wrong with the", "elevator was controversial leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to", "on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has not been", "controversial leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be to", "lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be to ask a new, but", "in an elevator was controversial leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus", "ask a new, but related, question on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but", "new, but related, question on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial", "but related, question on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception", "[has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has not been positive. What is", "discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be to ask a new, but related, question", "The consensus appeared to be to ask a new, but related, question on", "to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be to ask a", "a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be to ask a new,", "lingerie joke made in an elevator was controversial leading to a lively [meta", "to ask a new, but related, question on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people)", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109789/what-was-offensive-about-the-ladies-lingerie-department-joke-and-how-can-i-av) about the lingerie joke made in an elevator was controversial leading to", "consensus appeared to be to ask a new, but related, question on issue.", "positive. What is wrong with the new question and what can be improved?", "related, question on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has", "has not been positive. What is wrong with the new question and what", "not been positive. What is wrong with the new question and what can", "the lingerie joke made in an elevator was controversial leading to a lively", "[meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be to ask a new, but related,", "question on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has not", "reception has not been positive. What is wrong with the new question and", "The [original question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109789/what-was-offensive-about-the-ladies-lingerie-department-joke-and-how-can-i-av) about the lingerie joke made in an elevator was controversial", "been positive. What is wrong with the new question and what can be", "appeared to be to ask a new, but related, question on issue. This", "[original question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109789/what-was-offensive-about-the-ladies-lingerie-department-joke-and-how-can-i-av) about the lingerie joke made in an elevator was controversial leading", "joke made in an elevator was controversial leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question).", "initial reception has not been positive. What is wrong with the new question", "issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has not been positive.", "This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has not been positive. What", "be to ask a new, but related, question on issue. This [has been", "a new, but related, question on issue. This [has been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the", "been done](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109937/how-can-i-avoid-causing-a-major-incident-by-offending-people) but the initial reception has not been positive. What is wrong", "was controversial leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared to be", "an elevator was controversial leading to a lively [meta discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4153/how-to-proceed-with-the-lingerie-elevator-question). The consensus appeared", "to be to ask a new, but related, question on issue. This [has" ]
[ "not fit the question (anymore). How shall we proceed with it? ### This", "* Should it be changed in a specific manner? * How shall we", "This Question In an answer, please propose how we should proceed with this", "an answer, please propose how we should proceed with this question: * Should", "quite some change since it was posted. In particular, some of the answers", "the answers do not fit the question (anymore). How shall we proceed with", "academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of debate and undergone quite some change since", "that do not address the question in its current form? * How shall", "the question (anymore). How shall we proceed with it? ### This Question In", "question (anymore). How shall we proceed with it? ### This Question In an", "with answers that do not address the question in its current form? ", "was posted. In particular, some of the answers do not fit the question", "it stay open? Should it be changed in a specific manner? ", "undergone quite some change since it was posted. In particular, some of the", "a specific manner? How shall we deal with answers that do not", "should proceed with this question: * Should it be closed? * Should it", "in its current form? * How shall we deal with opinionated answers (and", "in a specific manner? * How shall we deal with answers that do", "proceed with this question: * Should it be closed? * Should it stay", "we proceed with it? ### This Question In an answer, please propose how", "how we should proceed with this question: * Should it be closed? ", "How shall we deal with answers that do not address the question in", "change since it was posted. In particular, some of the answers do not", "particular, some of the answers do not fit the question (anymore). How shall", "we should proceed with this question: Should it be closed? * Should", "propose how we should proceed with this question: * Should it be closed?", "fit the question (anymore). How shall we proceed with it? ### This Question", "of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of debate and undergone quite some change", "do not address the question in its current form? * How shall we", "and undergone quite some change since it was posted. In particular, some of", "debate and undergone quite some change since it was posted. In particular, some", "deal with answers that do not address the question in its current form?", "How shall we proceed with it? ### This Question In an answer, please", "of debate and undergone quite some change since it was posted. In particular,", "it was posted. In particular, some of the answers do not fit the", "answer, please propose how we should proceed with this question: * Should it", "* How shall we deal with answers that do not address the question", "lot of debate and undergone quite some change since it was posted. In", "of the answers do not fit the question (anymore). How shall we proceed", "with it? ### This Question In an answer, please propose how we should", "address the question in its current form? * How shall we deal with", "research explains political attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of debate and", "question: * Should it be closed? * Should it stay open? * Should", "In an answer, please propose how we should proceed with this question: ", "specific manner? How shall we deal with answers that do not address", "with this question: * Should it be closed? * Should it stay open?", "Should it stay open? * Should it be changed in a specific manner?", "be closed? * Should it stay open? * Should it be changed in", "a lot of debate and undergone quite some change since it was posted.", "shall we proceed with it? ### This Question In an answer, please propose", "[What research explains political attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of debate", "question in its current form? * How shall we deal with opinionated answers", "posted. In particular, some of the answers do not fit the question (anymore).", "proceed with it? ### This Question In an answer, please propose how we", "Should it be closed? * Should it stay open? * Should it be", "answers that do not address the question in its current form? * How", "changed in a specific manner? * How shall we deal with answers that", "answers do not fit the question (anymore). How shall we proceed with it?", "it be closed? * Should it stay open? * Should it be changed", "some of the answers do not fit the question (anymore). How shall we", "some change since it was posted. In particular, some of the answers do", "closed? * Should it stay open? * Should it be changed in a", "shall we deal with answers that do not address the question in its", "The question [What research explains political attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot", "it be changed in a specific manner? * How shall we deal with", "open? * Should it be changed in a specific manner? * How shall", "the question in its current form? * How shall we deal with opinionated", "this question: * Should it be closed? * Should it stay open? ", " Should it stay open? * Should it be changed in a specific", "Should it be changed in a specific manner? * How shall we deal", "political attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of debate and undergone quite", "explains political attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of debate and undergone", "since it was posted. In particular, some of the answers do not fit", "* Should it be closed? * Should it stay open? * Should it", "attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of debate and undergone quite some", "do not fit the question (anymore). How shall we proceed with it? ###", "we deal with answers that do not address the question in its current", "In particular, some of the answers do not fit the question (anymore). How", "question [What research explains political attitudes of academics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/110059/7734) has attracted a lot of", "please propose how we should proceed with this question: * Should it be", "stay open? * Should it be changed in a specific manner? * How", "### This Question In an answer, please propose how we should proceed with", "manner? * How shall we deal with answers that do not address the", "be changed in a specific manner? * How shall we deal with answers", "not address the question in its current form? * How shall we deal", "it? ### This Question In an answer, please propose how we should proceed", "Question In an answer, please propose how we should proceed with this question:", "its current form? * How shall we deal with opinionated answers (and comments)?", "attracted a lot of debate and undergone quite some change since it was", "(anymore). How shall we proceed with it? ### This Question In an answer,", "has attracted a lot of debate and undergone quite some change since it" ]
[ "wrong? Is it because these disciplines are on their computers more, relative to", "been here for about 1-2 months, and clearly see that most of the", "and clearly see that most of the questions come from mathematicians or computer", "mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is it because these disciplines are", "months, and clearly see that most of the questions come from mathematicians or", "see that most of the questions come from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am", "the questions come from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is it", "because these disciplines are on their computers more, relative to a chemist or", "I have been here for about 1-2 months, and clearly see that most", "from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is it because these disciplines", "computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is it because these disciplines are on their", "here for about 1-2 months, and clearly see that most of the questions", "clearly see that most of the questions come from mathematicians or computer scientists.", "questions come from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is it because", "that most of the questions come from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I", "most of the questions come from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I wrong?", "these disciplines are on their computers more, relative to a chemist or biologist?", "1-2 months, and clearly see that most of the questions come from mathematicians", "Am I wrong? Is it because these disciplines are on their computers more,", "of the questions come from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is", "about 1-2 months, and clearly see that most of the questions come from", "scientists. Am I wrong? Is it because these disciplines are on their computers", "Is it because these disciplines are on their computers more, relative to a", "it because these disciplines are on their computers more, relative to a chemist", "come from mathematicians or computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is it because these", "I wrong? Is it because these disciplines are on their computers more, relative", "or computer scientists. Am I wrong? Is it because these disciplines are on", "for about 1-2 months, and clearly see that most of the questions come", "have been here for about 1-2 months, and clearly see that most of" ]
[ "with the silly question and it mentions the legality of a situation that", "the applicant or presenter is confronted with the silly question and it mentions", "the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my right to apply for any", "that actually happened. I didn’t want to make this question only US-based, because", "intended for career development of US- and Canada-based academic staff. It talks about", "want to make this question only US-based, because I thought this is an", "the questioned why I choose such a distance, therefore limiting my right to", "this question only US-based, because I thought this is an international platform and", "job and have a right to be employed. The question is concise; it", "for a job and have a right to be employed. The question is", "specific webinar intended for career development of US- and Canada-based academic staff. It", "situation when the applicant or presenter is confronted with the silly question and", "I didn’t want to make this question only US-based, because I thought this", "make this question only US-based, because I thought this is an international platform", "happened. I didn’t want to make this question only US-based, because I thought", "question and it mentions the legality of a situation that actually happened. I", "applicant or presenter is confronted with the silly question and it mentions the", "because I thought this is an international platform and that people from other", "be employed. The question is concise; it refers to a specific webinar intended", "of a situation that actually happened. I didn’t want to make this question", "a situation that actually happened. I didn’t want to make this question only", "this question [How should I handle questions about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614)", "right to look for a job and have a right to be employed.", "of putting on hold this question [How should I handle questions about family/spouse", "about the special situation when the applicant or presenter is confronted with the", "development of US- and Canada-based academic staff. It talks about the special situation", "putting on hold this question [How should I handle questions about family/spouse on", "situation that actually happened. I didn’t want to make this question only US-based,", "on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my right to apply for", "it refers to a specific webinar intended for career development of US- and", "that it limits my right to apply for any position without being the", "concise; it refers to a specific webinar intended for career development of US-", "family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my right to apply", "of US- and Canada-based academic staff. It talks about the special situation when", "to make this question only US-based, because I thought this is an international", "irony of putting on hold this question [How should I handle questions about", "apply for any position without being the questioned why I choose such a", "therefore limiting my right to look for a job and have a right", "for career development of US- and Canada-based academic staff. It talks about the", "presenter is confronted with the silly question and it mentions the legality of", "a job and have a right to be employed. The question is concise;", "a distance, therefore limiting my right to look for a job and have", "it limits my right to apply for any position without being the questioned", "the special situation when the applicant or presenter is confronted with the silly", "for any position without being the questioned why I choose such a distance,", "career development of US- and Canada-based academic staff. It talks about the special", "about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my right to", "position without being the questioned why I choose such a distance, therefore limiting", "handle questions about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my", "job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my right to apply for any position", "and have a right to be employed. The question is concise; it refers", "silly question and it mentions the legality of a situation that actually happened.", "is that it limits my right to apply for any position without being", "the silly question and it mentions the legality of a situation that actually", "to a specific webinar intended for career development of US- and Canada-based academic", "legality of a situation that actually happened. I didn’t want to make this", "I choose such a distance, therefore limiting my right to look for a", "on hold this question [How should I handle questions about family/spouse on the", "is concise; it refers to a specific webinar intended for career development of", "webinar intended for career development of US- and Canada-based academic staff. It talks", "question is concise; it refers to a specific webinar intended for career development", "right to apply for any position without being the questioned why I choose", "to look for a job and have a right to be employed. The", "question only US-based, because I thought this is an international platform and that", "refers to a specific webinar intended for career development of US- and Canada-based", "It talks about the special situation when the applicant or presenter is confronted", "limits my right to apply for any position without being the questioned why", "distance, therefore limiting my right to look for a job and have a", "the legality of a situation that actually happened. I didn’t want to make", "[How should I handle questions about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that", "is an international platform and that people from other countries can contribute answering.", "mentions the legality of a situation that actually happened. I didn’t want to", "have a right to be employed. The question is concise; it refers to", "is confronted with the silly question and it mentions the legality of a", "my right to apply for any position without being the questioned why I", "a right to be employed. The question is concise; it refers to a", "US- and Canada-based academic staff. It talks about the special situation when the", "talks about the special situation when the applicant or presenter is confronted with", "didn’t want to make this question only US-based, because I thought this is", "my right to look for a job and have a right to be", "thought this is an international platform and that people from other countries can", "it mentions the legality of a situation that actually happened. I didn’t want", "why I choose such a distance, therefore limiting my right to look for", "I thought this is an international platform and that people from other countries", "limiting my right to look for a job and have a right to", "confronted with the silly question and it mentions the legality of a situation", "US-based, because I thought this is an international platform and that people from", "choose such a distance, therefore limiting my right to look for a job", "a specific webinar intended for career development of US- and Canada-based academic staff.", "such a distance, therefore limiting my right to look for a job and", "being the questioned why I choose such a distance, therefore limiting my right", "Canada-based academic staff. It talks about the special situation when the applicant or", "without being the questioned why I choose such a distance, therefore limiting my", "actually happened. I didn’t want to make this question only US-based, because I", "or presenter is confronted with the silly question and it mentions the legality", "to apply for any position without being the questioned why I choose such", "any position without being the questioned why I choose such a distance, therefore", "should I handle questions about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it", "I handle questions about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits", "when the applicant or presenter is confronted with the silly question and it", "only US-based, because I thought this is an international platform and that people", "special situation when the applicant or presenter is confronted with the silly question", "right to be employed. The question is concise; it refers to a specific", "this is an international platform and that people from other countries can contribute", "and Canada-based academic staff. It talks about the special situation when the applicant", "staff. It talks about the special situation when the applicant or presenter is", "hold this question [How should I handle questions about family/spouse on the job", "look for a job and have a right to be employed. The question", "and it mentions the legality of a situation that actually happened. I didn’t", "employed. The question is concise; it refers to a specific webinar intended for", "market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my right to apply for any position without", "question [How should I handle questions about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is", "The irony of putting on hold this question [How should I handle questions", "The question is concise; it refers to a specific webinar intended for career", "to be employed. The question is concise; it refers to a specific webinar", "questioned why I choose such a distance, therefore limiting my right to look", "questions about family/spouse on the job market?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110614) is that it limits my right", "academic staff. It talks about the special situation when the applicant or presenter" ]
[ "to such a long ban? In practical terms, this is \"forever\". The way", "Some of us might even be happily pushing up the daisies by then.", "Tower chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28 years. Incredible! I took", "pushing up the daisies by then. What I could imagine is that the", "nothing bad. Really nothing. I might be missing something, but which kind of", "banned for 28 years. Incredible! I took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at", "something, but which kind of offense would lead to such a long ban?", "practical terms, this is \"forever\". The way we know the stackexchange site today,", "such a long time span. Some of us might even be happily pushing", "even be happily pushing up the daisies by then. What I could imagine", "a long ban? In practical terms, this is \"forever\". The way we know", "terms, this is \"forever\". The way we know the stackexchange site today, it", "I could imagine is that the user might be way too young to", "need not even exist for such a long time span. Some of us", "not even exist for such a long time span. Some of us might", "is \"forever\". The way we know the stackexchange site today, it need not", "is that the user might be way too young to discuss academic issues,", "nothing. I might be missing something, but which kind of offense would lead", "it need not even exist for such a long time span. Some of", "28 years. Incredible! I took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and", "happily pushing up the daisies by then. What I could imagine is that", "Incredible! I took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found nothing", "by then. What I could imagine is that the user might be way", "young to discuss academic issues, say, 5 years old. Then, about 20 years", "long time span. Some of us might even be happily pushing up the", "look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really nothing. I", "ban? In practical terms, this is \"forever\". The way we know the stackexchange", "chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28 years. Incredible! I took a", "might be missing something, but which kind of offense would lead to such", "then. What I could imagine is that the user might be way too", "years. Incredible! I took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found", "academic issues, say, 5 years old. Then, about 20 years might make sense.", "found nothing bad. Really nothing. I might be missing something, but which kind", "daisies by then. What I could imagine is that the user might be", "bad. Really nothing. I might be missing something, but which kind of offense", "such a long ban? In practical terms, this is \"forever\". The way we", "lead to such a long ban? In practical terms, this is \"forever\". The", "us might even be happily pushing up the daisies by then. What I", "The way we know the stackexchange site today, it need not even exist", "posts at academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really nothing. I might be missing", "site today, it need not even exist for such a long time span.", "even exist for such a long time span. Some of us might even", "long ban? In practical terms, this is \"forever\". The way we know the", "a long time span. Some of us might even be happily pushing up", "the user might be way too young to discuss academic issues, say, 5", "way too young to discuss academic issues, say, 5 years old. Then, about", "academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really nothing. I might be missing something, but", "In practical terms, this is \"forever\". The way we know the stackexchange site", "at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really nothing. I might", "be way too young to discuss academic issues, say, 5 years old. Then,", "that the user might be way too young to discuss academic issues, say,", "that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28 years. Incredible! I took a look", "which kind of offense would lead to such a long ban? In practical", "exist for such a long time span. Some of us might even be", "and found nothing bad. Really nothing. I might be missing something, but which", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28 years. Incredible! I took a look at", "What I could imagine is that the user might be way too young", "would lead to such a long ban? In practical terms, this is \"forever\".", "we know the stackexchange site today, it need not even exist for such", "the Ivory Tower chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28 years. Incredible!", "the daisies by then. What I could imagine is that the user might", "I took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found nothing bad.", "of us might even be happily pushing up the daisies by then. What", "took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really", "to discuss academic issues, say, 5 years old. Then, about 20 years might", "be happily pushing up the daisies by then. What I could imagine is", "offense would lead to such a long ban? In practical terms, this is", "today, it need not even exist for such a long time span. Some", "noticed in the Ivory Tower chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28", "could imagine is that the user might be way too young to discuss", "of offense would lead to such a long ban? In practical terms, this", "Really nothing. I might be missing something, but which kind of offense would", "in the Ivory Tower chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28 years.", "for such a long time span. Some of us might even be happily", "Ivory Tower chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for 28 years. Incredible! I", "span. Some of us might even be happily pushing up the daisies by", "for 28 years. Incredible! I took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE", "kind of offense would lead to such a long ban? In practical terms,", "up the daisies by then. What I could imagine is that the user", "know the stackexchange site today, it need not even exist for such a", "might be way too young to discuss academic issues, say, 5 years old.", "I might be missing something, but which kind of offense would lead to", "stackexchange site today, it need not even exist for such a long time", "but which kind of offense would lead to such a long ban? In", "user might be way too young to discuss academic issues, say, 5 years", "this is \"forever\". The way we know the stackexchange site today, it need", "time span. Some of us might even be happily pushing up the daisies", "at academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really nothing. I might be missing something,", "be missing something, but which kind of offense would lead to such a", "been banned for 28 years. Incredible! I took a look at D.Hutchinson's posts", "the stackexchange site today, it need not even exist for such a long", "D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really nothing. I might be", "@scaaahu noticed in the Ivory Tower chat that <https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/91603/d-hutchinson?tab=profile> has been banned for", "missing something, but which kind of offense would lead to such a long", "imagine is that the user might be way too young to discuss academic", "might even be happily pushing up the daisies by then. What I could", "a look at D.Hutchinson's posts at academia.SE and found nothing bad. Really nothing.", "has been banned for 28 years. Incredible! I took a look at D.Hutchinson's", "way we know the stackexchange site today, it need not even exist for", "too young to discuss academic issues, say, 5 years old. Then, about 20", "discuss academic issues, say, 5 years old. Then, about 20 years might make", "\"forever\". The way we know the stackexchange site today, it need not even" ]
[ "questions on the issue of research funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was", "Since I want to be more familiar with the norms of Academia Stack", "(I am not the author). Since I want to be more familiar with", "want to be more familiar with the norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I", "Academia Stack Exchange, I want to know why this question which ask for", "the issue of research funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I", "author). Since I want to be more familiar with the norms of Academia", "familiar with the norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I want to know why", "that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not the author). Since I want", "the norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I want to know why this question", "norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I want to know why this question which", "found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not the author). Since I", "more familiar with the norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I want to know", "was closed (I am not the author). Since I want to be more", "browse the questions on the issue of research funding, I found that [this", "am not the author). Since I want to be more familiar with the", "want to know why this question which ask for the funding sources was", "When I browse the questions on the issue of research funding, I found", "with the norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I want to know why this", "of research funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not the author). Since I want to", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not the author). Since I want to be", "research funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not the", "be more familiar with the norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I want to", "to be more familiar with the norms of Academia Stack Exchange, I want", "the questions on the issue of research funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate)", "Exchange, I want to know why this question which ask for the funding", "know why this question which ask for the funding sources was deemed off-topic.", "not the author). Since I want to be more familiar with the norms", "funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not the author).", "the author). Since I want to be more familiar with the norms of", "I browse the questions on the issue of research funding, I found that", "of Academia Stack Exchange, I want to know why this question which ask", "to know why this question which ask for the funding sources was deemed", "I want to be more familiar with the norms of Academia Stack Exchange,", "on the issue of research funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed", "closed (I am not the author). Since I want to be more familiar", "I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am not the author). Since", "Stack Exchange, I want to know why this question which ask for the", "I want to know why this question which ask for the funding sources", "issue of research funding, I found that [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/100499/funding-in-mathematics-from-large-companies-as-undergraduate) was closed (I am" ]
[ "and the journal name from my case in this academia.SE question? It was", "several online lists that mention predatory journals and publishers, and the journal and", "journal name from my case in this academia.SE question? It was mentioned that", "predatory journal: [Can an academic journal with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I", "could I mention the publisher and the journal name from my case in", "[Can an academic journal with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed", "there. Should I and could I mention the publisher and the journal name", "I mention the publisher and the journal name from my case in this", "with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the subsequent answers", "that mention predatory journals and publishers, and the journal and its publsiher were", "describe how I believe to be the target of a possibly predatory journal:", "the publisher and the journal name from my case in this academia.SE question?", "my case in this academia.SE question? It was mentioned that this could perhaps", "following question, I describe how I believe to be the target of a", "also help others, but that I should first discuss this publication here, on", "publsiher were not listed there. Should I and could I mention the publisher", "this could perhaps help me clarify the situation for me, if someone on", "publisher and the journal name from my case in this academia.SE question? It", "academia.SE question? It was mentioned that this could perhaps help me clarify the", "reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the subsequent answers about several", "to be the target of a possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic journal", "a possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic journal with low reputation be a", "informed in the subsequent answers about several online lists that mention predatory journals", "in this academia.SE question? It was mentioned that this could perhaps help me", "perhaps help me clarify the situation for me, if someone on here knows", "target of a possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic journal with low reputation", "on here knows specifically about this journal, and also help others, but that", "was informed in the subsequent answers about several online lists that mention predatory", "believe to be the target of a possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic", "could perhaps help me clarify the situation for me, if someone on here", "this academia.SE question? It was mentioned that this could perhaps help me clarify", "possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic journal with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam)", "predatory journals and publishers, and the journal and its publsiher were not listed", "was mentioned that this could perhaps help me clarify the situation for me,", "knows specifically about this journal, and also help others, but that I should", "In the following question, I describe how I believe to be the target", "case in this academia.SE question? It was mentioned that this could perhaps help", "Should I and could I mention the publisher and the journal name from", "I and could I mention the publisher and the journal name from my", "about several online lists that mention predatory journals and publishers, and the journal", "from my case in this academia.SE question? It was mentioned that this could", "listed there. Should I and could I mention the publisher and the journal", "online lists that mention predatory journals and publishers, and the journal and its", "a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the subsequent answers about several online lists", "the target of a possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic journal with low", "and also help others, but that I should first discuss this publication here,", "I describe how I believe to be the target of a possibly predatory", "publishers, and the journal and its publsiher were not listed there. Should I", "I believe to be the target of a possibly predatory journal: [Can an", "here knows specifically about this journal, and also help others, but that I", "and the journal and its publsiher were not listed there. Should I and", "low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the subsequent answers about", "lists that mention predatory journals and publishers, and the journal and its publsiher", "be the target of a possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic journal with", "subsequent answers about several online lists that mention predatory journals and publishers, and", "for me, if someone on here knows specifically about this journal, and also", "I was informed in the subsequent answers about several online lists that mention", "the journal name from my case in this academia.SE question? It was mentioned", "an academic journal with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in", "the following question, I describe how I believe to be the target of", "help me clarify the situation for me, if someone on here knows specifically", "journal and its publsiher were not listed there. Should I and could I", "It was mentioned that this could perhaps help me clarify the situation for", "scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the subsequent answers about several online lists that", "of a possibly predatory journal: [Can an academic journal with low reputation be", "this journal, and also help others, but that I should first discuss this", "answers about several online lists that mention predatory journals and publishers, and the", "me clarify the situation for me, if someone on here knows specifically about", "academic journal with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the", "how I believe to be the target of a possibly predatory journal: [Can", "and publishers, and the journal and its publsiher were not listed there. Should", "mentioned that this could perhaps help me clarify the situation for me, if", "help others, but that I should first discuss this publication here, on meta.", "its publsiher were not listed there. Should I and could I mention the", "were not listed there. Should I and could I mention the publisher and", "specifically about this journal, and also help others, but that I should first", "journal: [Can an academic journal with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was", "question? It was mentioned that this could perhaps help me clarify the situation", "clarify the situation for me, if someone on here knows specifically about this", "not listed there. Should I and could I mention the publisher and the", "question, I describe how I believe to be the target of a possibly", "and could I mention the publisher and the journal name from my case", "if someone on here knows specifically about this journal, and also help others,", "journal with low reputation be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the subsequent", "name from my case in this academia.SE question? It was mentioned that this", "journal, and also help others, but that I should first discuss this publication", "the journal and its publsiher were not listed there. Should I and could", "about this journal, and also help others, but that I should first discuss", "situation for me, if someone on here knows specifically about this journal, and", "mention the publisher and the journal name from my case in this academia.SE", "mention predatory journals and publishers, and the journal and its publsiher were not", "journals and publishers, and the journal and its publsiher were not listed there.", "in the subsequent answers about several online lists that mention predatory journals and", "the situation for me, if someone on here knows specifically about this journal,", "the subsequent answers about several online lists that mention predatory journals and publishers,", "someone on here knows specifically about this journal, and also help others, but", "be a scam?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/110785/can-an-academic-journal-with-low-reputation-be-a-scam) I was informed in the subsequent answers about several online", "me, if someone on here knows specifically about this journal, and also help", "and its publsiher were not listed there. Should I and could I mention", "that this could perhaps help me clarify the situation for me, if someone" ]
[ "PhD applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying for", "another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an Australian PhD program in computer science", "with a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an Australian", "are mainly about application procedure in other countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities,", "questions on the Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions procedure in different countries. One", "time to start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be", "procedure in different countries. One of the best questions, succeeded to cover questions", "point to his main point of question? In my opinion, having similar format", "some advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead users with similar questions directly to", "Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an instance, if somebody has question about application", "questions/ one question for each country!) and questions should specifically be written and", "Australian PhD program in computer science without a masters degree, with a dual", "a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an Australian PhD", "mention that, this question should not lead to opening as many questions as", "BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about questions which have similar concept, but", "better to form his question as the above mentioned question (something like: How", "mainly focus on admissions procedure in different countries. One of the best questions,", "exactly point to his main point of question? In my opinion, having similar", "has some advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead users with similar questions directly", "them to our site, but can mislead users by wrapping many questions in", "any other normal question on this site and exactly point to his main", "as we can (serial questions/ one question for each country!) and questions should", "disadvantages, can easily lead users with similar questions directly to their point of", "on the Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions procedure in different countries. One of", "question as the above mentioned question (something like: How does the admissions process", "admissions procedure in different countries. One of the best questions, succeeded to cover", "[Is it possible to be admitted to a masters in Germany with a", "As an instance, if somebody has question about application procedure for starting a", "does the admissions process work for PhD programs in the US, particularly for", "PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be admitted to a masters in", "of the best questions, succeeded to cover questions about application procedure in the", "In my opinion, having similar format of question like our How does the", "work for PhD programs in Austria, particularly for weak or borderline students?) or", "(serial questions/ one question for each country!) and questions should specifically be written", "the admissions process work for PhD programs in Austria, particularly for weak or", "Germany with a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an", "somebody has question about application procedure for starting a PhD program in Austria,", "contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616)", "work for PhD programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?", "to his main point of question? In my opinion, having similar format of", "best questions, succeeded to cover questions about application procedure in the United States,", "countries. One of the best questions, succeeded to cover questions about application procedure", "of the users. [What is the process for PhD applications and contacting professors", "if somebody has question about application procedure for starting a PhD program in", "his main point of question? In my opinion, having similar format of question", "an instance, if somebody has question about application procedure for starting a PhD", "having similar format of question like our How does the admissions process work", "not lead to opening as many questions as we can (serial questions/ one", "his question the same as any other normal question on this site and", "was previously opened and attracted huge amount of attention of the users. [What", "France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible", "point of vagueness which has brought them to our site, but can mislead", "PhD programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?* has some", "he ask his question the same as any other normal question on this", "question? In my opinion, having similar format of question like our How does", "country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an Australian PhD program in computer science without", "questions in just similar formats. Not to mention that, this question should not", "have similar concept, but are mainly about application procedure in other countries, like", "concept, but are mainly about application procedure in other countries, like France, Germany,", "question about application procedure for starting a PhD program in Austria, is it", "One of the best questions, succeeded to cover questions about application procedure in", "written and opened if any user has indeed some problem during his PhD", "the US, particularly for weak or borderline students? has some advantages and disadvantages,", "program in Austria, is it better to form his question as the above", "start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be admitted to", "in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?* has some advantages and", "easily lead users with similar questions directly to their point of vagueness which", "3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an Australian PhD program", "a PhD program in Austria, is it better to form his question as", "applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be admitted to a", "science without a masters degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is", "about application procedure for starting a PhD program in Austria, is it better", "the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted huge amount of attention", "question is particularly about questions which have similar concept, but are mainly about", "his question as the above mentioned question (something like: How does the admissions", "in different countries. One of the best questions, succeeded to cover questions about", "has brought them to our site, but can mislead users by wrapping many", "degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about questions which have similar concept, but are", "admitted to a masters in Germany with a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840)", "this site and exactly point to his main point of question? In my", "like our How does the admissions process work for PhD programs in the", "as any other normal question on this site and exactly point to his", "should he ask his question the same as any other normal question on", "Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions procedure in different countries. One of the best", "that, this question should not lead to opening as many questions as we", "program in computer science without a masters degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174)", "PhD program in computer science without a masters degree, with a dual BSc", "in Austria, is it better to form his question as the above mentioned", "masters in Germany with a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get", "(something like: How does the admissions process work for PhD programs in Austria,", "get into an Australian PhD program in computer science without a masters degree,", "and disadvantages, can easily lead users with similar questions directly to their point", "as many questions as we can (serial questions/ one question for each country!)", "programs in Austria, particularly for weak or borderline students?) or should he ask", "Asian universities, etc. As an instance, if somebody has question about application procedure", "vagueness which has brought them to our site, but can mislead users by", "brought them to our site, but can mislead users by wrapping many questions", "be written and opened if any user has indeed some problem during his", "users by wrapping many questions in just similar formats. Not to mention that,", "which has brought them to our site, but can mislead users by wrapping", "degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about questions which", "How does the admissions process work for PhD programs in Austria, particularly for", "is it better to form his question as the above mentioned question (something", "professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is", "my opinion, having similar format of question like our How does the admissions", "the Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions procedure in different countries. One of the", "France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an instance, if somebody has question about", "other countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an instance, if somebody", "a masters degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about", "etc. As an instance, if somebody has question about application procedure for starting", "starting a PhD program in Austria, is it better to form his question", "and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying for PhD -", "wrapping many questions in just similar formats. Not to mention that, this question", "PhD programs in Austria, particularly for weak or borderline students?) or should he", "the process for PhD applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to", "application procedure in other countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an", "My question is particularly about questions which have similar concept, but are mainly", "specifically be written and opened if any user has indeed some problem during", "procedure for starting a PhD program in Austria, is it better to form", "to opening as many questions as we can (serial questions/ one question for", "which have similar concept, but are mainly about application procedure in other countries,", "a masters in Germany with a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I", "for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be admitted to a masters", "weak or borderline students?) or should he ask his question the same as", "for PhD applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying", "main point of question? In my opinion, having similar format of question like", "does the admissions process work for PhD programs in Austria, particularly for weak", "about application procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted", "point of question? In my opinion, having similar format of question like our", "we can (serial questions/ one question for each country!) and questions should specifically", "should specifically be written and opened if any user has indeed some problem", "[What is the process for PhD applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right", "similar concept, but are mainly about application procedure in other countries, like France,", "of vagueness which has brought them to our site, but can mislead users", "above mentioned question (something like: How does the admissions process work for PhD", "of question like our How does the admissions process work for PhD programs", "borderline students?* has some advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead users with similar", "attention of the users. [What is the process for PhD applications and contacting", "without a masters degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly", "their point of vagueness which has brought them to our site, but can", "for PhD programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?* has", "particularly about questions which have similar concept, but are mainly about application procedure", "form his question as the above mentioned question (something like: How does the", "particularly for weak or borderline students? has some advantages and disadvantages, can easily", "but can mislead users by wrapping many questions in just similar formats. Not", "opinion, having similar format of question like our How does the admissions process", "lead to opening as many questions as we can (serial questions/ one question", "programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students? has some advantages", "application procedure for starting a PhD program in Austria, is it better to", "succeeded to cover questions about application procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was", "one question for each country!) and questions should specifically be written and opened", "in other countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an instance, if", "for PhD programs in Austria, particularly for weak or borderline students?) or should", "the admissions process work for PhD programs in the US, particularly for weak", "applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying for PhD", "questions should specifically be written and opened if any user has indeed some", "into an Australian PhD program in computer science without a masters degree, with", "US, particularly for weak or borderline students? has some advantages and disadvantages, can", "questions directly to their point of vagueness which has brought them to our", "possible to be admitted to a masters in Germany with a 3-year bachelors", "just similar formats. Not to mention that, this question should not lead to", "site, but can mislead users by wrapping many questions in just similar formats.", "dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about questions which have similar concept,", "students?) or should he ask his question the same as any other normal", "like: How does the admissions process work for PhD programs in Austria, particularly", "mentioned question (something like: How does the admissions process work for PhD programs", "is particularly about questions which have similar concept, but are mainly about application", "focus on admissions procedure in different countries. One of the best questions, succeeded", "users with similar questions directly to their point of vagueness which has brought", "many questions in just similar formats. Not to mention that, this question should", "- Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be admitted to a masters in Germany", "and attracted huge amount of attention of the users. [What is the process", "but are mainly about application procedure in other countries, like France, Germany, Asian", "attracted huge amount of attention of the users. [What is the process for", "is the process for PhD applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time", "bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an Australian PhD program in", "the users. [What is the process for PhD applications and contacting professors in", "computer science without a masters degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question", "can easily lead users with similar questions directly to their point of vagueness", "to cover questions about application procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously", "has question about application procedure for starting a PhD program in Austria, is", "about application procedure in other countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As", "particularly for weak or borderline students?) or should he ask his question the", "the same as any other normal question on this site and exactly point", "to our site, but can mislead users by wrapping many questions in just", "or borderline students?* has some advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead users with", "to mention that, this question should not lead to opening as many questions", "this question should not lead to opening as many questions as we can", "in Austria, particularly for weak or borderline students?) or should he ask his", "can (serial questions/ one question for each country!) and questions should specifically be", "questions about application procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and", "question (something like: How does the admissions process work for PhD programs in", "process work for PhD programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline", "and exactly point to his main point of question? In my opinion, having", "similar questions directly to their point of vagueness which has brought them to", "formats. Not to mention that, this question should not lead to opening as", "opened and attracted huge amount of attention of the users. [What is the", "admissions process work for PhD programs in the US, particularly for weak or", "to start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be admitted", "Part of the questions on the Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions procedure in", "with similar questions directly to their point of vagueness which has brought them", "on admissions procedure in different countries. One of the best questions, succeeded to", "Austria, is it better to form his question as the above mentioned question", "as the above mentioned question (something like: How does the admissions process work", "How does the admissions process work for PhD programs in the US, particularly", "country!) and questions should specifically be written and opened if any user has", "and opened if any user has indeed some problem during his PhD application.", "in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted huge amount of", "by wrapping many questions in just similar formats. Not to mention that, this", "of the questions on the Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions procedure in different", "our site, but can mislead users by wrapping many questions in just similar", "[link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted huge amount of attention of the users.", "the questions on the Academia.SX mainly focus on admissions procedure in different countries.", "in just similar formats. Not to mention that, this question should not lead", "the above mentioned question (something like: How does the admissions process work for", "users. [What is the process for PhD applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681)", "for weak or borderline students? has some advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead", "it better to form his question as the above mentioned question (something like:", "I get into an Australian PhD program in computer science without a masters", "to their point of vagueness which has brought them to our site, but", "each country!) and questions should specifically be written and opened if any user", "to a masters in Germany with a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can", "question for each country!) and questions should specifically be written and opened if", "in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it", "[Right time to start applying for PhD - Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to", "of question? In my opinion, having similar format of question like our How", "Not to mention that, this question should not lead to opening as many", "different countries. One of the best questions, succeeded to cover questions about application", "opening as many questions as we can (serial questions/ one question for each", "to be admitted to a masters in Germany with a 3-year bachelors from", "process work for PhD programs in Austria, particularly for weak or borderline students?)", "similar formats. Not to mention that, this question should not lead to opening", "[Can I get into an Australian PhD program in computer science without a", "like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an instance, if somebody has question", "on this site and exactly point to his main point of question? In", "borderline students?) or should he ask his question the same as any other", "advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead users with similar questions directly to their", "questions which have similar concept, but are mainly about application procedure in other", "masters degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about questions", "mislead users by wrapping many questions in just similar formats. Not to mention", "format of question like our How does the admissions process work for PhD", "previously opened and attracted huge amount of attention of the users. [What is", "the best questions, succeeded to cover questions about application procedure in the United", "it possible to be admitted to a masters in Germany with a 3-year", "many questions as we can (serial questions/ one question for each country!) and", "question the same as any other normal question on this site and exactly", "for starting a PhD program in Austria, is it better to form his", "procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted huge amount", "in computer science without a masters degree, with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My", "United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted huge amount of attention of", "about questions which have similar concept, but are mainly about application procedure in", "same as any other normal question on this site and exactly point to", "question on this site and exactly point to his main point of question?", "with a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about questions which have", "application procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted huge", "or should he ask his question the same as any other normal question", "site and exactly point to his main point of question? In my opinion,", "Germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/48416/right-time-to-start-applying-for-phd-germany?s=5\|29.5616) [Is it possible to be admitted to a masters in Germany with", "and questions should specifically be written and opened if any user has indeed", "cover questions about application procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened", "for each country!) and questions should specifically be written and opened if any", "amount of attention of the users. [What is the process for PhD applications", "other normal question on this site and exactly point to his main point", "weak or borderline students?* has some advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead users", "admissions process work for PhD programs in Austria, particularly for weak or borderline", "of attention of the users. [What is the process for PhD applications and", "similar format of question like our How does the admissions process work for", "question like our How does the admissions process work for PhD programs in", "Austria, particularly for weak or borderline students?) or should he ask his question", "questions as we can (serial questions/ one question for each country!) and questions", "from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into an Australian PhD program in computer", "questions, succeeded to cover questions about application procedure in the United States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly);", "a dual BSc degree?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55853/can-i-get-into-an-australian-phd-program-in-computer-science-without-a-masters-d?s=9\|17.6174) My question is particularly about questions which have similar", "an Australian PhD program in computer science without a masters degree, with a", "ask his question the same as any other normal question on this site", "should not lead to opening as many questions as we can (serial questions/", "States, [link](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly); was previously opened and attracted huge amount of attention of the", "process for PhD applications and contacting professors in France?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/16824/what-is-the-process-for-phd-applications-and-contacting-professors-in-france?s=1\|32.7681) [Right time to start", "huge amount of attention of the users. [What is the process for PhD", "or borderline students?) or should he ask his question the same as any", "normal question on this site and exactly point to his main point of", "students?* has some advantages and disadvantages, can easily lead users with similar questions", "directly to their point of vagueness which has brought them to our site,", "our How does the admissions process work for PhD programs in the US,", "lead users with similar questions directly to their point of vagueness which has", "to form his question as the above mentioned question (something like: How does", "instance, if somebody has question about application procedure for starting a PhD program", "countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an instance, if somebody has", "universities, etc. As an instance, if somebody has question about application procedure for", "can mislead users by wrapping many questions in just similar formats. Not to", "be admitted to a masters in Germany with a 3-year bachelors from another", "mainly about application procedure in other countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc.", "procedure in other countries, like France, Germany, Asian universities, etc. As an instance,", "PhD program in Austria, is it better to form his question as the", "question should not lead to opening as many questions as we can (serial", "in Germany with a 3-year bachelors from another country?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/60439/is-it-possible-to-be-admitted-to-a-masters-in-germany-with-a-3-year-bachelors-fr?s=10\|27.0840) [Can I get into", "for weak or borderline students?*) or should he ask his question the same" ]
[ "see any measure that prevents users from doing that. When the question is", "question to be reopened upon a request for moderator intervention. By the time", "duplicates and the people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my", "is a chance that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in the cases", "encourage them to read the questions more carefully before flagging it as duplicate?", "on the matter and the question is already an old one so the", "asked as duplicates of other questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates and the", "low. Wouldn't it be better if there was a measure to discourage users", "A few people flagged the last couple of questions I asked as duplicates", "few people flagged the last couple of questions I asked as duplicates of", "explaining why the question is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as", "as duplicate is so easy and I don't see any measure that prevents", "Yet, flagging a question as duplicate is so easy and I don't see", "the question is already an old one so the chances of getting the", "the question has missed a few days of time for acting on the", "has missed a few days of time for acting on the matter and", "while they clearly weren't duplicates and the people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed", "people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation that was", "getting the answer after reopening would be very low. Wouldn't it be better", "matter and the question is already an old one so the chances of", "time for acting on the matter and the question is already an old", "was a measure to discourage users from false flagging and encourage them to", "misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation that was explaining why the question is", "acting on the matter and the question is already an old one so", "a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as duplicate is so easy and I", "question as duplicate is so easy and I don't see any measure that", "old one so the chances of getting the answer after reopening would be", "chances of getting the answer after reopening would be very low. Wouldn't it", "the people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation that", "an old one so the chances of getting the answer after reopening would", "the question is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as duplicate is", "that. When the question is closed, it takes time for the question to", "reopening would be very low. Wouldn't it be better if there was a", "explanation that was explaining why the question is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging", "is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as duplicate is so easy", "it as duplicate? There is a chance that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding,", "upon a request for moderator intervention. By the time the question is reopened,", "the questions more carefully before flagging it as duplicate? There is a chance", "duplicates of other questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates and the people flagging", "if there was a measure to discourage users from false flagging and encourage", "moderator intervention. By the time the question is reopened, the person asking the", "questions more carefully before flagging it as duplicate? There is a chance that", "questions I asked as duplicates of other questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates", "the question to be reopened upon a request for moderator intervention. By the", "from doing that. When the question is closed, it takes time for the", "By the time the question is reopened, the person asking the question has", "flagging it as duplicate? There is a chance that it's only the flagger's", "a measure to discourage users from false flagging and encourage them to read", "is so easy and I don't see any measure that prevents users from", "my explanation that was explaining why the question is not a duplicate. Yet,", "as duplicates of other questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates and the people", "so the chances of getting the answer after reopening would be very low.", "for moderator intervention. By the time the question is reopened, the person asking", "takes time for the question to be reopened upon a request for moderator", "carefully before flagging it as duplicate? There is a chance that it's only", "users from false flagging and encourage them to read the questions more carefully", "days of time for acting on the matter and the question is already", "of questions I asked as duplicates of other questions, while they clearly weren't", "and the people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation", "the last couple of questions I asked as duplicates of other questions, while", "the question is reopened, the person asking the question has missed a few", "discourage users from false flagging and encourage them to read the questions more", "the matter and the question is already an old one so the chances", "reopened upon a request for moderator intervention. By the time the question is", "and encourage them to read the questions more carefully before flagging it as", "for acting on the matter and the question is already an old one", "it be better if there was a measure to discourage users from false", "only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in the cases mentioned, the questioner is punished.", "the question is closed, it takes time for the question to be reopened", "already an old one so the chances of getting the answer after reopening", "answer after reopening would be very low. Wouldn't it be better if there", "flagging and encourage them to read the questions more carefully before flagging it", "measure to discourage users from false flagging and encourage them to read the", "people flagged the last couple of questions I asked as duplicates of other", "users from doing that. When the question is closed, it takes time for", "other questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates and the people flagging it had", "flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation that was explaining", "duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as duplicate is so easy and I don't", "is closed, it takes time for the question to be reopened upon a", "why the question is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as duplicate", "to be reopened upon a request for moderator intervention. By the time the", "they clearly weren't duplicates and the people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the", "the chances of getting the answer after reopening would be very low. Wouldn't", "more carefully before flagging it as duplicate? There is a chance that it's", "I don't see any measure that prevents users from doing that. When the", "flagged the last couple of questions I asked as duplicates of other questions,", "of other questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates and the people flagging it", "be reopened upon a request for moderator intervention. By the time the question", "to discourage users from false flagging and encourage them to read the questions", "the answer after reopening would be very low. Wouldn't it be better if", "there was a measure to discourage users from false flagging and encourage them", "request for moderator intervention. By the time the question is reopened, the person", "reopened, the person asking the question has missed a few days of time", "be very low. Wouldn't it be better if there was a measure to", "time the question is reopened, the person asking the question has missed a", "duplicate? There is a chance that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in", "very low. Wouldn't it be better if there was a measure to discourage", "not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as duplicate is so easy and", "couple of questions I asked as duplicates of other questions, while they clearly", "don't see any measure that prevents users from doing that. When the question", "and the question is already an old one so the chances of getting", "last couple of questions I asked as duplicates of other questions, while they", "it takes time for the question to be reopened upon a request for", "the part of my explanation that was explaining why the question is not", "the time the question is reopened, the person asking the question has missed", "When the question is closed, it takes time for the question to be", "There is a chance that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in the", "flagging a question as duplicate is so easy and I don't see any", "person asking the question has missed a few days of time for acting", "missed a few days of time for acting on the matter and the", "false flagging and encourage them to read the questions more carefully before flagging", "I asked as duplicates of other questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates and", "is reopened, the person asking the question has missed a few days of", "that prevents users from doing that. When the question is closed, it takes", "questions, while they clearly weren't duplicates and the people flagging it had apparently", "any measure that prevents users from doing that. When the question is closed,", "of my explanation that was explaining why the question is not a duplicate.", "after reopening would be very low. Wouldn't it be better if there was", "a chance that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in the cases mentioned,", "for the question to be reopened upon a request for moderator intervention. By", "duplicate is so easy and I don't see any measure that prevents users", "be better if there was a measure to discourage users from false flagging", "a few days of time for acting on the matter and the question", "question is reopened, the person asking the question has missed a few days", "is already an old one so the chances of getting the answer after", "as duplicate? There is a chance that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but", "closed, it takes time for the question to be reopened upon a request", "better if there was a measure to discourage users from false flagging and", "measure that prevents users from doing that. When the question is closed, it", "intervention. By the time the question is reopened, the person asking the question", "it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in the cases mentioned, the questioner is", "so easy and I don't see any measure that prevents users from doing", "them to read the questions more carefully before flagging it as duplicate? There", "to read the questions more carefully before flagging it as duplicate? There is", "easy and I don't see any measure that prevents users from doing that.", "apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation that was explaining why the question", "that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in the cases mentioned, the questioner", "was explaining why the question is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question", "Wouldn't it be better if there was a measure to discourage users from", "before flagging it as duplicate? There is a chance that it's only the", "prevents users from doing that. When the question is closed, it takes time", "time for the question to be reopened upon a request for moderator intervention.", "question is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a question as duplicate is so", "and I don't see any measure that prevents users from doing that. When", "that was explaining why the question is not a duplicate. Yet, flagging a", "had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation that was explaining why the", "question has missed a few days of time for acting on the matter", "of time for acting on the matter and the question is already an", "question is closed, it takes time for the question to be reopened upon", "clearly weren't duplicates and the people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part", "a question as duplicate is so easy and I don't see any measure", "a request for moderator intervention. By the time the question is reopened, the", "asking the question has missed a few days of time for acting on", "would be very low. Wouldn't it be better if there was a measure", "the person asking the question has missed a few days of time for", "weren't duplicates and the people flagging it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of", "read the questions more carefully before flagging it as duplicate? There is a", "of getting the answer after reopening would be very low. Wouldn't it be", "doing that. When the question is closed, it takes time for the question", "part of my explanation that was explaining why the question is not a", "it had apparently misunderstood/missed the part of my explanation that was explaining why", "question is already an old one so the chances of getting the answer", "from false flagging and encourage them to read the questions more carefully before", "few days of time for acting on the matter and the question is", "chance that it's only the flagger's misunderstanding, but in the cases mentioned, the", "one so the chances of getting the answer after reopening would be very" ]
[ "are quite general and I am not able to understand how to interpret", "services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence)", "the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number of comments as well as", "original question. I am not sure another meta questions (i.e., this one) is", "to be conflicting votes: it is not as if the question has been", "I am not sure another meta questions (i.e., this one) is really needed", "to reopening the original question. I am not sure another meta questions (i.e.,", "guess I am asking because I would like to bring closure (even if", "on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both", "[Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a", "in regards to reopening the original question. I am not sure another meta", "questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is", "it is not as if the question has been closed and then reopened", "not able to understand how to interpret the votes in regards to reopening", "then reopened and then closed again. I guess I am asking because I", "and then closed again. I guess I am asking because I would like", "really needed since there does not seem to be conflicting votes: it is", "meta questions are quite general and I am not able to understand how", "I would like to bring closure (even if that means reopening the question)", "able to understand how to interpret the votes in regards to reopening the", "to bring closure (even if that means reopening the question) to the issue.", "there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite general and I", "since there does not seem to be conflicting votes: it is not as", "another meta questions (i.e., this one) is really needed since there does not", "am not able to understand how to interpret the votes in regards to", "number of comments as well as two meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking", "then closed again. I guess I am asking because I would like to", "closed and then reopened and then closed again. I guess I am asking", "There is a closed question on the OSF system: [Is there a way", "asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if", "on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is only", "votes: it is not as if the question has been closed and then", "is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite general and I am", "I guess I am asking because I would like to bring closure (even", "there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are", "regards to reopening the original question. I am not sure another meta questions", "am not sure another meta questions (i.e., this one) is really needed since", "is a closed question on the OSF system: [Is there a way to", "questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus", "evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite general and I am not able to", "a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite", "reopening the original question. I am not sure another meta questions (i.e., this", "votes in regards to reopening the original question. I am not sure another", "to move a preprint from one service to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys)", "question on the OSF system: [Is there a way to move a preprint", "OSF system: [Is there a way to move a preprint from one service", "two meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic)", "one service to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number", "because I would like to bring closure (even if that means reopening the", "is not as if the question has been closed and then reopened and", "meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2.", "questions (i.e., this one) is really needed since there does not seem to", "closed again. I guess I am asking because I would like to bring", "indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite general and I am not able", "sure another meta questions (i.e., this one) is really needed since there does", "to understand how to interpret the votes in regards to reopening the original", "another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number of comments as", "as well as two meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on", "of comments as well as two meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical", "a preprint from one service to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has", "been closed and then reopened and then closed again. I guess I am", "general and I am not able to understand how to interpret the votes", "how to interpret the votes in regards to reopening the original question. I", "only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite general and I am not", "OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number of comments as well as two", "way to move a preprint from one service to another within the OSF", "from one service to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a", "technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there", "understand how to interpret the votes in regards to reopening the original question.", "a way to move a preprint from one service to another within the", "issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is", "needed since there does not seem to be conflicting votes: it is not", "as two meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services", "comments as well as two meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues", "as if the question has been closed and then reopened and then closed", "1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there", "to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number of comments", "has been closed and then reopened and then closed again. I guess I", "within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number of comments as well", "questions are quite general and I am not able to understand how to", "quite general and I am not able to understand how to interpret the", "2. [Is there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta", "conflicting votes: it is not as if the question has been closed and", "[Is there a way to move a preprint from one service to another", "there does not seem to be conflicting votes: it is not as if", "spawned a number of comments as well as two meta questions: 1. [Are", "the votes in regards to reopening the original question. I am not sure", "and then reopened and then closed again. I guess I am asking because", "be conflicting votes: it is not as if the question has been closed", "not seem to be conflicting votes: it is not as if the question", "Both meta questions are quite general and I am not able to understand", "I am asking because I would like to bring closure (even if that", "am asking because I would like to bring closure (even if that means", "well as two meta questions: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic", "system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number of comments as well as two meta", "and I am not able to understand how to interpret the votes in", "service to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned a number of", "consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite general", "reopened and then closed again. I guess I am asking because I would", "question has been closed and then reopened and then closed again. I guess", "has spawned a number of comments as well as two meta questions: 1.", "preprint from one service to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that has spawned", "academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is only indirect", "meta questions (i.e., this one) is really needed since there does not seem", "again. I guess I am asking because I would like to bring closure", "this one) is really needed since there does not seem to be conflicting", "the original question. I am not sure another meta questions (i.e., this one)", "not sure another meta questions (i.e., this one) is really needed since there", "to interpret the votes in regards to reopening the original question. I am", "closed question on the OSF system: [Is there a way to move a", "seem to be conflicting votes: it is not as if the question has", "asking because I would like to bring closure (even if that means reopening", "not as if the question has been closed and then reopened and then", "there a way to move a preprint from one service to another within", "on the OSF system: [Is there a way to move a preprint from", "one) is really needed since there does not seem to be conflicting votes:", "interpret the votes in regards to reopening the original question. I am not", "is really needed since there does not seem to be conflicting votes: it", "the OSF system: [Is there a way to move a preprint from one", "I am not able to understand how to interpret the votes in regards", "that has spawned a number of comments as well as two meta questions:", "question. I am not sure another meta questions (i.e., this one) is really", "(i.e., this one) is really needed since there does not seem to be", "if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions are quite general and", "does not seem to be conflicting votes: it is not as if the", "[Is there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) Both meta questions", "the question has been closed and then reopened and then closed again. I", "would like to bring closure (even if that means reopening the question) to", "a closed question on the OSF system: [Is there a way to move", "if the question has been closed and then reopened and then closed again.", "like to bring closure (even if that means reopening the question) to the", "system: [Is there a way to move a preprint from one service to", "move a preprint from one service to another within the OSF system?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/109866/is-there-a-way-to-move-a-preprint-from-one-service-to-another-within-the-osf-sys) that", "a number of comments as well as two meta questions: 1. [Are questions" ]
[ "[review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving it as a", "description is this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic publications that", "> > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic publications that organize > and", "peer reviewing and have nothing to do with literature review articles. Hence, I", "rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be", "explanation (which many people, especially new posters, apparently never get around to reading),", "is, not leaving it as a synonym, since that would perpetuate the confusion.", "it as a synonym, since that would perpetuate the confusion. If this makes", "[literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be more explicit in", "as a synonym, since that would perpetuate the confusion. If this makes sense,", "that tag actually pertain to peer reviewing and have nothing to do with", "Despite this explanation (which many people, especially new posters, apparently never get around", "whose description is this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic publications", "in communicating the correct intention of the tag. In that case, I also", "that organize > and summarize the current state of research on a given", "subscribe to the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this:", "that is, not leaving it as a synonym, since that would perpetuate the", "integrates and adds understanding to work in the field. > For questions related", "the correct intention of the tag. In that case, I also propose deleting", "pertain to peer reviewing and have nothing to do with literature review articles.", "maybe as many as 50% of the questions with that tag actually pertain", "peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review' tag instead. > > > Despite this", "a > novel way that integrates and adds understanding to work in the", "or \"review\" articles are academic publications that organize > and summarize the current", "to work in the field. > For questions related to the peer-review process,", "tag, whose description is this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic", "Hence, I propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which", "For questions related to the peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review' tag instead.", "use the > 'peer-review' tag instead. > > > Despite this explanation (which", "explicit in communicating the correct intention of the tag. In that case, I", "reading), maybe as many as 50% of the questions with that tag actually", "would perpetuate the confusion. If this makes sense, then could someone with the", "questions related to the peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review' tag instead. >", "In that case, I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\")", "of the tag. In that case, I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show", "especially new posters, apparently never get around to reading), maybe as many as", "apparently never get around to reading), maybe as many as 50% of the", "with that tag actually pertain to peer reviewing and have nothing to do", "\"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic publications that organize > and summarize the", "the field. > For questions related to the peer-review process, use the >", "around to reading), maybe as many as 50% of the questions with that", "to the peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review' tag instead. > > >", "the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be more", "current state of research on a given topic in a > novel way", "adds understanding to work in the field. > For questions related to the", "more explicit in communicating the correct intention of the tag. In that case,", "the confusion. If this makes sense, then could someone with the right permissions", "actually pertain to peer reviewing and have nothing to do with literature review", "given topic in a > novel way that integrates and adds understanding to", "propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving", "which I think should be more explicit in communicating the correct intention of", "tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles", "confusion. If this makes sense, then could someone with the right permissions please", "since that would perpetuate the confusion. If this makes sense, then could someone", "new posters, apparently never get around to reading), maybe as many as 50%", "leaving it as a synonym, since that would perpetuate the confusion. If this", "with literature review articles. Hence, I propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show", "and have nothing to do with literature review articles. Hence, I propose to", "I subscribe to the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is", "organize > and summarize the current state of research on a given topic", "understanding to work in the field. > For questions related to the peer-review", "the questions with that tag actually pertain to peer reviewing and have nothing", "of research on a given topic in a > novel way that integrates", "have nothing to do with literature review articles. Hence, I propose to rename", "to peer reviewing and have nothing to do with literature review articles. Hence,", "summarize the current state of research on a given topic in a >", "synonym, since that would perpetuate the confusion. If this makes sense, then could", "a synonym, since that would perpetuate the confusion. If this makes sense, then", "reviewing and have nothing to do with literature review articles. Hence, I propose", "way that integrates and adds understanding to work in the field. > For", "novel way that integrates and adds understanding to work in the field. >", "many as 50% of the questions with that tag actually pertain to peer", "'peer-review' tag instead. > > > Despite this explanation (which many people, especially", "this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic publications that organize >", "tag. In that case, I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged", "questions with that tag actually pertain to peer reviewing and have nothing to", "and adds understanding to work in the field. > For questions related to", "topic in a > novel way that integrates and adds understanding to work", "review articles. Hence, I propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged", "research on a given topic in a > novel way that integrates and", "get around to reading), maybe as many as 50% of the questions with", "tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving it as a synonym, since that", "> > Despite this explanation (which many people, especially new posters, apparently never", "as many as 50% of the questions with that tag actually pertain to", "the tag. In that case, I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions", "makes sense, then could someone with the right permissions please make the change?", "questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be more explicit in communicating the", "case, I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that", "to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should", "be more explicit in communicating the correct intention of the tag. In that", "50% of the questions with that tag actually pertain to peer reviewing and", "instead. > > > Despite this explanation (which many people, especially new posters,", "'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be more explicit in communicating the correct intention", "I propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I", "> \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic publications that organize > and summarize", "\"review\" articles are academic publications that organize > and summarize the current state", "in the field. > For questions related to the peer-review process, use the", "questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\"", "that integrates and adds understanding to work in the field. > For questions", "academic publications that organize > and summarize the current state of research on", "communicating the correct intention of the tag. In that case, I also propose", "not leaving it as a synonym, since that would perpetuate the confusion. If", "field. > For questions related to the peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review'", "intention of the tag. In that case, I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles", "do with literature review articles. Hence, I propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles", "tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be more explicit", "to the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this: >", "this makes sense, then could someone with the right permissions please make the", "of the questions with that tag actually pertain to peer reviewing and have", "> novel way that integrates and adds understanding to work in the field.", "(which many people, especially new posters, apparently never get around to reading), maybe", "to reading), maybe as many as 50% of the questions with that tag", "the > 'peer-review' tag instead. > > > Despite this explanation (which many", "the current state of research on a given topic in a > novel", "also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not", "should be more explicit in communicating the correct intention of the tag. In", "that would perpetuate the confusion. If this makes sense, then could someone with", "related to the peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review' tag instead. > >", "[review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this: > > \"Survey\"", "'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving it as a synonym, since that would", "> For questions related to the peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review' tag", "work in the field. > For questions related to the peer-review process, use", "articles are academic publications that organize > and summarize the current state of", "propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think", "are academic publications that organize > and summarize the current state of research", "perpetuate the confusion. If this makes sense, then could someone with the right", "this explanation (which many people, especially new posters, apparently never get around to", "I think should be more explicit in communicating the correct intention of the", "many people, especially new posters, apparently never get around to reading), maybe as", "people, especially new posters, apparently never get around to reading), maybe as many", "\"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this: > > \"Survey\" or", "process, use the > 'peer-review' tag instead. > > > Despite this explanation", "articles. Hence, I propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"),", "the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this: > >", "never get around to reading), maybe as many as 50% of the questions", "is this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are academic publications that organize", "and summarize the current state of research on a given topic in a", "a given topic in a > novel way that integrates and adds understanding", "think should be more explicit in communicating the correct intention of the tag.", "> and summarize the current state of research on a given topic in", "> Despite this explanation (which many people, especially new posters, apparently never get", "'review-articles'\") tag, whose description is this: > > \"Survey\" or \"review\" articles are", "deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving it", "If this makes sense, then could someone with the right permissions please make", "that case, I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag;", "state of research on a given topic in a > novel way that", "as 50% of the questions with that tag actually pertain to peer reviewing", "> > > Despite this explanation (which many people, especially new posters, apparently", "tag; that is, not leaving it as a synonym, since that would perpetuate", "the peer-review process, use the > 'peer-review' tag instead. > > > Despite", "the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving it as", "literature review articles. Hence, I propose to rename the tag [literature-review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/literature-review-articles \"show questions", "to do with literature review articles. Hence, I propose to rename the tag", "tag instead. > > > Despite this explanation (which many people, especially new", "questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving it as a synonym, since", "tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be more explicit in communicating the correct", "publications that organize > and summarize the current state of research on a", "posters, apparently never get around to reading), maybe as many as 50% of", "correct intention of the tag. In that case, I also propose deleting the", "> 'peer-review' tag instead. > > > Despite this explanation (which many people,", "\"show questions tagged 'literature-review-articles'\"), which I think should be more explicit in communicating", "in a > novel way that integrates and adds understanding to work in", "on a given topic in a > novel way that integrates and adds", "tag actually pertain to peer reviewing and have nothing to do with literature", "\"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is, not leaving it as a synonym,", "nothing to do with literature review articles. Hence, I propose to rename the", "I also propose deleting the [review-articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-articles \"show questions tagged 'review-articles'\") tag; that is," ]
[ "services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence)", "2. [Is there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should", "because although whether the [original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or", "the original question is on-topic and should have already been reopened. Yet it's", "funny, because although whether the [original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened", "not. People only vote, but don't act. My questions are: 1. What does", "be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is clear, in principle and in specific,", "there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on the OSF system", "[Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a", "Yet it's not. People only vote, but don't act. My questions are: 1.", "principle and in specific, that the original question is on-topic and should have", "questions are: 1. What does consensus mean if there is no action? 2.", "recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is", "the [original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I think", "on-topic and should have already been reopened. Yet it's not. People only vote,", "it is clear, in principle and in specific, that the original question is", "OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is clear, in principle and", "don't act. My questions are: 1. What does consensus mean if there is", "consensus, then what should they do, when people who can act don't act?", "question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I think the meta", "As of today, it is clear, in principle and in specific, that the", "is clear, in principle and in specific, that the original question is on-topic", "asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if", "on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is only", "a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on", "that the original question is on-topic and should have already been reopened. Yet", "is more interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on", "[original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I think the", "[Is there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this", "3. [Should this question on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today,", "questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus", "if there is no action? 2. If the mods are the representatives of", "People only vote, but don't act. My questions are: 1. What does consensus", "clear, in principle and in specific, that the original question is on-topic and", "it's not. People only vote, but don't act. My questions are: 1. What", "[Should this question on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it", "in principle and in specific, that the original question is on-topic and should", "or not, I think the meta series is more interesting. First, let's recap:", "about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I think the meta series", "in specific, that the original question is on-topic and should have already been", "reopened or not, I think the meta series is more interesting. First, let's", "question on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is clear,", "only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341)", "the meta series is more interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking", "already been reopened. Yet it's not. People only vote, but don't act. My", "1. What does consensus mean if there is no action? 2. If the", "the mods are the representatives of the consensus, then what should they do,", "question is on-topic and should have already been reopened. Yet it's not. People", "is on-topic and should have already been reopened. Yet it's not. People only", "no action? 2. If the mods are the representatives of the consensus, then", "mods are the representatives of the consensus, then what should they do, when", "interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services", "think the meta series is more interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions", "more interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic", "representatives of the consensus, then what should they do, when people who can", "there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question", "on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is clear, in", "are: 1. What does consensus mean if there is no action? 2. If", "this question on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is", "vote, but don't act. My questions are: 1. What does consensus mean if", "there is no action? 2. If the mods are the representatives of the", "action? 2. If the mods are the representatives of the consensus, then what", "technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there", "My questions are: 1. What does consensus mean if there is no action?", "issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is", "First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic)", "not, I think the meta series is more interesting. First, let's recap: 1.", "have already been reopened. Yet it's not. People only vote, but don't act.", "1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there", "specific, that the original question is on-topic and should have already been reopened.", "mean if there is no action? 2. If the mods are the representatives", "are the representatives of the consensus, then what should they do, when people", "is reopened or not, I think the meta series is more interesting. First,", "whether the [original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I", "let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues on academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2.", "should have already been reopened. Yet it's not. People only vote, but don't", "What does consensus mean if there is no action? 2. If the mods", "the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is clear, in principle", "today, it is clear, in principle and in specific, that the original question", "system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I think the meta series is more interesting.", "meta series is more interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical", "original question is on-topic and should have already been reopened. Yet it's not.", "but don't act. My questions are: 1. What does consensus mean if there", "reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is clear, in principle and in specific, that", "if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on the OSF", "of today, it is clear, in principle and in specific, that the original", "been reopened. Yet it's not. People only vote, but don't act. My questions", "reopened. Yet it's not. People only vote, but don't act. My questions are:", "the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I think the meta series is", "academic services on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is only indirect", "act. My questions are: 1. What does consensus mean if there is no", "and in specific, that the original question is on-topic and should have already", "consensus mean if there is no action? 2. If the mods are the", "the consensus, then what should they do, when people who can act don't", "OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not, I think the meta series is more", "quite funny, because although whether the [original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is", "system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of today, it is clear, in principle and in", "consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on the", "evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As of", "the representatives of the consensus, then what should they do, when people who", "is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on the OSF system be", "and should have already been reopened. Yet it's not. People only vote, but", "although whether the [original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341) is reopened or not,", "I think the meta series is more interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are", "of the consensus, then what should they do, when people who can act", "2. If the mods are the representatives of the consensus, then what should", "indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3. [Should this question on the OSF system be reopened?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4217/14341) As", "is no action? 2. If the mods are the representatives of the consensus,", "does consensus mean if there is no action? 2. If the mods are", "If the mods are the representatives of the consensus, then what should they", "series is more interesting. First, let's recap: 1. [Are questions asking technical issues", "This is quite funny, because although whether the [original question about the OSF", "is quite funny, because although whether the [original question about the OSF system](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/109866/14341)", "on-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4162/are-questions-asking-technical-issues-on-academic-services-on-topic) 2. [Is there a consensus if there is only indirect evidence?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4211/is-there-a-consensus-if-there-is-only-indirect-evidence) 3.", "only vote, but don't act. My questions are: 1. What does consensus mean" ]
[ "moved to chat? If your answer is that deleting subsequent comment streams as", "comments was moved to chat per the usual site policy, and two subsequent", "comment streams as was done in this case is the best policy, please", "that effect). My question: what should be done about the comments associated with", "you think this best serves the purpose of fostering the most informed and", "who left me a chat comment explained that they “had to” delete the", "to the debate, and which continue unabated long after the initial stream of", "the most informed and high-quality discussion possible (or why it serves some other,", "were deleted were very thoughtful and interesting and, in my (possibly biased) opinion,", "my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the debate on OP’s question", "comment explained that they “had to” delete the comments because comments can only", "opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the debate on OP’s question and related ethics", "initial stream of comments has been moved to chat? If your answer is", "this best serves the purpose of fostering the most informed and high-quality discussion", "the purpose of fostering the most informed and high-quality discussion possible (or why", "done in this case is the best policy, please explain why you think", "including long streams of comments, many of which are of high quality and", "questions or answers that attract a lot of attention, including long streams of", "of comments was moved to chat per the usual site policy, and two", "frustrates users who have thought and attention to writing good comments, but also", "the debate, and which continue unabated long after the initial stream of comments", "to chat? If your answer is that deleting subsequent comment streams as was", "hand” (or words to that effect). My question: what should be done about", "been quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive and negative votes and a long", "the comments because comments can only be moved to chat once and the", "importantly) deprives the community at large of important follow-up content. A moderator who", "usual site policy, and two subsequent long streams of comments were simply deleted", "of important follow-up content. A moderator who left me a chat comment explained", "was “getting out of hand” (or words to that effect). My question: what", "been moved to chat? If your answer is that deleting subsequent comment streams", "has been quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive and negative votes and a", "only frustrates users who have thought and attention to writing good comments, but", "of the comments thus seems quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion and contrary", "left me a chat comment explained that they “had to” delete the comments", "per the usual site policy, and two subsequent long streams of comments were", "the community at large of important follow-up content. A moderator who left me", "to that effect). My question: what should be done about the comments associated", "goals of the site. It not only frustrates users who have thought and", "public announcement or explanation. Many of the comments that were deleted were very", "“had to” delete the comments because comments can only be moved to chat", "If your answer is that deleting subsequent comment streams as was done in", "users who have thought and attention to writing good comments, but also (more", "deprives the community at large of important follow-up content. A moderator who left", "The deletion of the comments thus seems quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion", "once and the comments thread was “getting out of hand” (or words to", "to chat once and the comments thread was “getting out of hand” (or", "comments, many of which are of high quality and highly relevant to the", "comments thus seems quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion and contrary to the", "streams of comments were simply deleted with no public announcement or explanation. Many", "deleting subsequent comment streams as was done in this case is the best", "informed and high-quality discussion possible (or why it serves some other, even more", "in this case is the best policy, please explain why you think this", "this case is the best policy, please explain why you think this best", "comments has been moved to chat? If your answer is that deleting subsequent", "on OP’s question and related ethics questions. The deletion of the comments thus", "chat comment explained that they “had to” delete the comments because comments can", "unabated long after the initial stream of comments has been moved to chat?", "comments, but also (more importantly) deprives the community at large of important follow-up", "comments. An initial batch of comments was moved to chat per the usual", "the comments that were deleted were very thoughtful and interesting and, in my", "a long thread of comments. An initial batch of comments was moved to", "the best policy, please explain why you think this best serves the purpose", "of the comments that were deleted were very thoughtful and interesting and, in", "the site. It not only frustrates users who have thought and attention to", "with questions or answers that attract a lot of attention, including long streams", "best serves the purpose of fostering the most informed and high-quality discussion possible", "of comments were simply deleted with no public announcement or explanation. Many of", "and contrary to the goals of the site. It not only frustrates users", "attract a lot of attention, including long streams of comments, many of which", "and related ethics questions. The deletion of the comments thus seems quite detrimental", "two subsequent long streams of comments were simply deleted with no public announcement", "with no public announcement or explanation. Many of the comments that were deleted", "can only be moved to chat once and the comments thread was “getting", "of comments, many of which are of high quality and highly relevant to", "seems quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion and contrary to the goals of", "explained that they “had to” delete the comments because comments can only be", "question and related ethics questions. The deletion of the comments thus seems quite", "questions. The deletion of the comments thus seems quite detrimental to a high-quality", "to furthering the debate on OP’s question and related ethics questions. The deletion", "were very thoughtful and interesting and, in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly", "to chat per the usual site policy, and two subsequent long streams of", "(more importantly) deprives the community at large of important follow-up content. A moderator", "“getting out of hand” (or words to that effect). My question: what should", "in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the debate on OP’s", "the comments thus seems quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion and contrary to", "site. It not only frustrates users who have thought and attention to writing", "or explanation. Many of the comments that were deleted were very thoughtful and", "hundred positive and negative votes and a long thread of comments. An initial", "quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive and negative votes and a long thread", "and two subsequent long streams of comments were simply deleted with no public", "were simply deleted with no public announcement or explanation. Many of the comments", "important follow-up content. A moderator who left me a chat comment explained that", "be moved to chat once and the comments thread was “getting out of", "A moderator who left me a chat comment explained that they “had to”", "about the comments associated with questions or answers that attract a lot of", "why it serves some other, even more important, goal that I’m not thinking", "of fostering the most informed and high-quality discussion possible (or why it serves", "relevant to the debate, and which continue unabated long after the initial stream", "after the initial stream of comments has been moved to chat? If your", "attracting several hundred positive and negative votes and a long thread of comments.", "moved to chat once and the comments thread was “getting out of hand”", "comments thread was “getting out of hand” (or words to that effect). My", "not only frustrates users who have thought and attention to writing good comments,", "question: what should be done about the comments associated with questions or answers", "answers that attract a lot of attention, including long streams of comments, many", "highly relevant to the debate, and which continue unabated long after the initial", "long after the initial stream of comments has been moved to chat? If", "policy, and two subsequent long streams of comments were simply deleted with no", "comments because comments can only be moved to chat once and the comments", "My answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/111498/40589) has been quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive", "the comments thread was “getting out of hand” (or words to that effect).", "the comments associated with questions or answers that attract a lot of attention,", "My question: what should be done about the comments associated with questions or", "fostering the most informed and high-quality discussion possible (or why it serves some", "furthering the debate on OP’s question and related ethics questions. The deletion of", "only be moved to chat once and the comments thread was “getting out", "please explain why you think this best serves the purpose of fostering the", "greatly to furthering the debate on OP’s question and related ethics questions. The", "which continue unabated long after the initial stream of comments has been moved", "batch of comments was moved to chat per the usual site policy, and", "deletion of the comments thus seems quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion and", "also (more importantly) deprives the community at large of important follow-up content. A", "subsequent long streams of comments were simply deleted with no public announcement or", "have thought and attention to writing good comments, but also (more importantly) deprives", "to” delete the comments because comments can only be moved to chat once", "out of hand” (or words to that effect). My question: what should be", "it serves some other, even more important, goal that I’m not thinking of).", "most informed and high-quality discussion possible (or why it serves some other, even", "positive and negative votes and a long thread of comments. An initial batch", "of comments has been moved to chat? If your answer is that deleting", "biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the debate on OP’s question and related", "possible (or why it serves some other, even more important, goal that I’m", "was moved to chat per the usual site policy, and two subsequent long", "the debate on OP’s question and related ethics questions. The deletion of the", "policy, please explain why you think this best serves the purpose of fostering", "community at large of important follow-up content. A moderator who left me a", "negative votes and a long thread of comments. An initial batch of comments", "detrimental to a high-quality discussion and contrary to the goals of the site.", "attention to writing good comments, but also (more importantly) deprives the community at", "done about the comments associated with questions or answers that attract a lot", "writing good comments, but also (more importantly) deprives the community at large of", "explanation. Many of the comments that were deleted were very thoughtful and interesting", "controversial, attracting several hundred positive and negative votes and a long thread of", "high-quality discussion and contrary to the goals of the site. It not only", "good comments, but also (more importantly) deprives the community at large of important", "comments associated with questions or answers that attract a lot of attention, including", "deleted with no public announcement or explanation. Many of the comments that were", "comments that were deleted were very thoughtful and interesting and, in my (possibly", "best policy, please explain why you think this best serves the purpose of", "me a chat comment explained that they “had to” delete the comments because", "discussion and contrary to the goals of the site. It not only frustrates", "is the best policy, please explain why you think this best serves the", "that were deleted were very thoughtful and interesting and, in my (possibly biased)", "is that deleting subsequent comment streams as was done in this case is", "It not only frustrates users who have thought and attention to writing good", "several hundred positive and negative votes and a long thread of comments. An", "be done about the comments associated with questions or answers that attract a", "high quality and highly relevant to the debate, and which continue unabated long", "long thread of comments. An initial batch of comments was moved to chat", "long streams of comments were simply deleted with no public announcement or explanation.", "site policy, and two subsequent long streams of comments were simply deleted with", "what should be done about the comments associated with questions or answers that", "debate, and which continue unabated long after the initial stream of comments has", "thus seems quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion and contrary to the goals", "think this best serves the purpose of fostering the most informed and high-quality", "lot of attention, including long streams of comments, many of which are of", "OP’s question and related ethics questions. The deletion of the comments thus seems", "but also (more importantly) deprives the community at large of important follow-up content.", "follow-up content. A moderator who left me a chat comment explained that they", "a high-quality discussion and contrary to the goals of the site. It not", "the initial stream of comments has been moved to chat? If your answer", "purpose of fostering the most informed and high-quality discussion possible (or why it", "delete the comments because comments can only be moved to chat once and", "and highly relevant to the debate, and which continue unabated long after the", "large of important follow-up content. A moderator who left me a chat comment", "thought and attention to writing good comments, but also (more importantly) deprives the", "and attention to writing good comments, but also (more importantly) deprives the community", "are of high quality and highly relevant to the debate, and which continue", "and high-quality discussion possible (or why it serves some other, even more important,", "which are of high quality and highly relevant to the debate, and which", "of high quality and highly relevant to the debate, and which continue unabated", "at large of important follow-up content. A moderator who left me a chat", "of attention, including long streams of comments, many of which are of high", "votes and a long thread of comments. An initial batch of comments was", "and the comments thread was “getting out of hand” (or words to that", "that they “had to” delete the comments because comments can only be moved", "thread was “getting out of hand” (or words to that effect). My question:", "of comments. An initial batch of comments was moved to chat per the", "chat? If your answer is that deleting subsequent comment streams as was done", "high-quality discussion possible (or why it serves some other, even more important, goal", "to the goals of the site. It not only frustrates users who have", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/111498/40589) has been quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive and negative votes and", "Many of the comments that were deleted were very thoughtful and interesting and,", "to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/111498/40589) has been quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive and negative", "effect). My question: what should be done about the comments associated with questions", "attention, including long streams of comments, many of which are of high quality", "continue unabated long after the initial stream of comments has been moved to", "An initial batch of comments was moved to chat per the usual site", "has been moved to chat? If your answer is that deleting subsequent comment", "content. A moderator who left me a chat comment explained that they “had", "your answer is that deleting subsequent comment streams as was done in this", "words to that effect). My question: what should be done about the comments", "and which continue unabated long after the initial stream of comments has been", "deleted were very thoughtful and interesting and, in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed", "related ethics questions. The deletion of the comments thus seems quite detrimental to", "chat once and the comments thread was “getting out of hand” (or words", "many of which are of high quality and highly relevant to the debate,", "quality and highly relevant to the debate, and which continue unabated long after", "as was done in this case is the best policy, please explain why", "a lot of attention, including long streams of comments, many of which are", "initial batch of comments was moved to chat per the usual site policy,", "interesting and, in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the debate", "stream of comments has been moved to chat? If your answer is that", "they “had to” delete the comments because comments can only be moved to", "explain why you think this best serves the purpose of fostering the most", "(or words to that effect). My question: what should be done about the", "contrary to the goals of the site. It not only frustrates users who", "moderator who left me a chat comment explained that they “had to” delete", "long streams of comments, many of which are of high quality and highly", "streams of comments, many of which are of high quality and highly relevant", "of which are of high quality and highly relevant to the debate, and", "why you think this best serves the purpose of fostering the most informed", "simply deleted with no public announcement or explanation. Many of the comments that", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/111498/40589) has been quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive and negative votes", "answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/111498/40589) has been quite controversial, attracting several hundred positive and", "discussion possible (or why it serves some other, even more important, goal that", "(or why it serves some other, even more important, goal that I’m not", "streams as was done in this case is the best policy, please explain", "and interesting and, in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the", "to a high-quality discussion and contrary to the goals of the site. It", "a chat comment explained that they “had to” delete the comments because comments", "chat per the usual site policy, and two subsequent long streams of comments", "very thoughtful and interesting and, in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to", "announcement or explanation. Many of the comments that were deleted were very thoughtful", "the goals of the site. It not only frustrates users who have thought", "or answers that attract a lot of attention, including long streams of comments,", "no public announcement or explanation. Many of the comments that were deleted were", "and a long thread of comments. An initial batch of comments was moved", "comments can only be moved to chat once and the comments thread was", "associated with questions or answers that attract a lot of attention, including long", "contributed greatly to furthering the debate on OP’s question and related ethics questions.", "ethics questions. The deletion of the comments thus seems quite detrimental to a", "quite detrimental to a high-quality discussion and contrary to the goals of the", "thoughtful and interesting and, in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering", "that attract a lot of attention, including long streams of comments, many of", "and negative votes and a long thread of comments. An initial batch of", "comments were simply deleted with no public announcement or explanation. Many of the", "to writing good comments, but also (more importantly) deprives the community at large", "that deleting subsequent comment streams as was done in this case is the", "moved to chat per the usual site policy, and two subsequent long streams", "the usual site policy, and two subsequent long streams of comments were simply", "serves the purpose of fostering the most informed and high-quality discussion possible (or", "case is the best policy, please explain why you think this best serves", "subsequent comment streams as was done in this case is the best policy,", "thread of comments. An initial batch of comments was moved to chat per", "(possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the debate on OP’s question and", "of hand” (or words to that effect). My question: what should be done", "debate on OP’s question and related ethics questions. The deletion of the comments", "who have thought and attention to writing good comments, but also (more importantly)", "was done in this case is the best policy, please explain why you", "because comments can only be moved to chat once and the comments thread", "should be done about the comments associated with questions or answers that attract", "and, in my (possibly biased) opinion, contributed greatly to furthering the debate on", "answer is that deleting subsequent comment streams as was done in this case", "of the site. It not only frustrates users who have thought and attention" ]
[ "[Is there any relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396)", "the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced via social media, my question", "of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and", "P.S. in my opinion the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the", "any relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after", "in my opinion the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National", "my opinion the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science", "there some issue with LGBTQ on this part of SE? P.S. in my", "some issue with LGBTQ on this part of SE? P.S. in my opinion", "National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Transportation),", "of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and New Your", "off topic? Is there some issue with LGBTQ on this part of SE?", "on this part of SE? P.S. in my opinion the Department of Energy,", "Latino is not even race, [Is this statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have", "about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it", "referencing Nature and New Your time is off topic? Is there some issue", "LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and New Your time", "there any relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even", "the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Transportation), are not part of", "fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and New Your time is off topic? Is", "this statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct)", "not even race, [Is this statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD", "Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Transportation), are not", "and New Your time is off topic? Is there some issue with LGBTQ", "this part of SE? P.S. in my opinion the Department of Energy, the", "issue with LGBTQ on this part of SE? P.S. in my opinion the", "after referencing Nature and New Your time is off topic? Is there some", "Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department", "media, my question [Is there any relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists", "PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced via social media,", "and it was only referenced via social media, my question [Is there any", "referenced via social media, my question [Is there any relible evidence of underrepresentation", "via social media, my question [Is there any relible evidence of underrepresentation of", "race, [Is this statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the", "my question [Is there any relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in", "the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA,", "a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced via social", "in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced via social media, my", "of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear", "Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the", "was only referenced via social media, my question [Is there any relible evidence", "opinion the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation,", "scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and New Your time is", "is not even race, [Is this statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a", "Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory", "topic? Is there some issue with LGBTQ on this part of SE? P.S.", "part of SE? P.S. in my opinion the Department of Energy, the Environmental", "STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and New Your time is off topic?", "relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing", "even race, [Is this statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in", "the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,", "have a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced via", "of SE? P.S. in my opinion the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection", "it was only referenced via social media, my question [Is there any relible", "evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature", "social media, my question [Is there any relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ", "question [Is there any relible evidence of underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM", "time is off topic? Is there some issue with LGBTQ on this part", "statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and", "[Is this statistic about how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the USA", "Nature and New Your time is off topic? Is there some issue with", "with LGBTQ on this part of SE? P.S. in my opinion the Department", "SE? P.S. in my opinion the Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency,", "USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced via social media, my question [Is", "Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Transportation), are", "in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and New Your time is off", "the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of", "Your time is off topic? Is there some issue with LGBTQ on this", "many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only", "NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Transportation), are not part", "underrepresentation of LGBTQ scientists in STEM fields?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/112396/is-there-any-relible-evidence-of-underrepresentation-of-lgbtq-scientists-in-stem?noredirect=1#comment295797_112396) even after referencing Nature and New", "LGBTQ on this part of SE? P.S. in my opinion the Department of", "even after referencing Nature and New Your time is off topic? Is there", "how many Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was", "Is there some issue with LGBTQ on this part of SE? P.S. in", "only referenced via social media, my question [Is there any relible evidence of", "Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and", "is off topic? Is there some issue with LGBTQ on this part of", "correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced via social media, my question [Is there", "Department of Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, the National Science Foundation, NASA, the", "Latinos/Hispanics have a PhD in the USA correct?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111045/is-this-statistic-about-how-many-latinos-hispanics-have-a-phd-in-the-usa-correct) and it was only referenced", "New Your time is off topic? Is there some issue with LGBTQ on", "Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Department of Transportation), are not part of Academia" ]
[ "borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries is probably no", "no means unique either; see all the questions that are already linked to", "similar in essence at all. At best, the answer in the community question", "is only tangentially related; it doesn't say anything about status changes for example.", "different than journal workflows in different journals + fields. Are the redirects overdone?", "like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar in essence at all. At best, the", "community question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\" question is similar to redirecting", "redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions process", "for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries", "tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries is probably no less different than", "that are already linked to the community question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical", "to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical workflow of a journal", "the typical workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar", "process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline", "for example. This question is by no means unique either; see all the", "such as [\"Manuscript status changed from Review in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review)", "question is similar to redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How", "Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\" question is similar to redirecting [\"How to", "similar to redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the", "status changed from Review in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does", "Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag", "to [\"How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US,", "everything to the \"typical workflow\" question is similar to redirecting [\"How to nail", "best, the answer in the community question is only tangentially related; it doesn't", "see all the questions that are already linked to the community question. Redirecting", "We commonly redirect questions such as [\"Manuscript status changed from Review in progress", "say anything about status changes for example. This question is by no means", "the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes", "workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar in essence", "essence at all. At best, the answer in the community question is only", "the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak", "either; see all the questions that are already linked to the community question.", "commonly redirect questions such as [\"Manuscript status changed from Review in progress to", "in essence at all. At best, the answer in the community question is", "question is only tangentially related; it doesn't say anything about status changes for", "changed from Review in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the", "answer in the community question is only tangentially related; it doesn't say anything", "of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar in essence at", "the community question is only tangentially related; it doesn't say anything about status", "is by no means unique either; see all the questions that are already", "unique either; see all the questions that are already linked to the community", "are already linked to the community question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\"", "as [\"Manuscript status changed from Review in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to", "typical workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar in", "not similar in essence at all. At best, the answer in the community", "to [\"What does the typical workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they", "[\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions process work", "related; it doesn't say anything about status changes for example. This question is", "countries is probably no less different than journal workflows in different journals +", "only tangentially related; it doesn't say anything about status changes for example. This", "example. This question is by no means unique either; see all the questions", "probably no less different than journal workflows in different journals + fields. Are", "Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical workflow of a journal look", "tangentially related; it doesn't say anything about status changes for example. This question", "all. At best, the answer in the community question is only tangentially related;", "status changes for example. This question is by no means unique either; see", "is similar to redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does", "doesn't say anything about status changes for example. This question is by no", "programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding.", "[\"What does the typical workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are", "notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries is probably no less different than journal", "different countries is probably no less different than journal workflows in different journals", "the questions that are already linked to the community question. Redirecting everything to", "are not similar in essence at all. At best, the answer in the", "nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions process work for Ph.D.", "for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like).", "by no means unique either; see all the questions that are already linked", "anything about status changes for example. This question is by no means unique", "in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical workflow of", "from Review in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical", "interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the", "[\"How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly", "they are not similar in essence at all. At best, the answer in", "or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries is probably", "\"typical workflow\" question is similar to redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview)", "However they are not similar in essence at all. At best, the answer", "does the typical workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not", "in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions", "a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar in essence at all.", "to the community question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\" question is similar", "less different than journal workflows in different journals + fields. Are the redirects", "particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different", "students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries is probably no less", "journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar in essence at all. At", "progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical workflow of a", "the \"typical workflow\" question is similar to redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D.", "about status changes for example. This question is by no means unique either;", "a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs", "the community question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\" question is similar to", "linked to the community question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\" question is", "question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\" question is similar to redirecting [\"How", "no less different than journal workflows in different journals + fields. Are the", "This question is by no means unique either; see all the questions that", "for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country", "At best, the answer in the community question is only tangentially related; it", "processes in different countries is probably no less different than journal workflows in", "country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries is probably no less different", "redirect questions such as [\"Manuscript status changed from Review in progress to Ready", "Admissions processes in different countries is probably no less different than journal workflows", "question is by no means unique either; see all the questions that are", "weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in different countries is", "Review in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical workflow", "already linked to the community question. Redirecting everything to the \"typical workflow\" question", "does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for", "US, particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly), country tag notwithstanding. Admissions processes in", "in different countries is probably no less different than journal workflows in different", "in the community question is only tangentially related; it doesn't say anything about", "the answer in the community question is only tangentially related; it doesn't say", "at all. At best, the answer in the community question is only tangentially", "changes for example. This question is by no means unique either; see all", "to the \"typical workflow\" question is similar to redirecting [\"How to nail a", "is probably no less different than journal workflows in different journals + fields.", "it doesn't say anything about status changes for example. This question is by", "look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However they are not similar in essence at all. At best,", "community question is only tangentially related; it doesn't say anything about status changes", "review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What does the typical workflow of a journal look like\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like). However", "questions that are already linked to the community question. Redirecting everything to the", "questions such as [\"Manuscript status changed from Review in progress to Ready for", "[\"Manuscript status changed from Review in progress to Ready for review\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114030/manuscript-status-changed-from-review-in-progress-to-ready-for-review) to [\"What", "means unique either; see all the questions that are already linked to the", "Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in", "to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions process work for", "admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or", "work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-the-us-particularly),", "workflow\" question is similar to redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to", "to redirecting [\"How to nail a Ph.D. interview?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/113996/how-to-nail-a-ph-d-interview) to [\"How does the admissions", "all the questions that are already linked to the community question. Redirecting everything" ]
[ "any scientists who support Brexit. Since there are - a minority, but still", "new question. Should I ask a separate question instead of awarding a bounty?", "bounty recently for [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in the bounty notice:", "but am having second thoughts that perhaps a separate question is better, especially", "the bounty notice: most of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the", "a bounty, but am having second thoughts that perhaps a separate question is", "the answers. I've already started a bounty, but am having second thoughts that", "now and asking a new question. Should I ask a separate question instead", "story, then there shouldn't be any scientists who support Brexit. Since there are", "something is missing among all the answers. I've already started a bounty, but", "answer. I don't mind just awarding the bounty now and asking a new", "having second thoughts that perhaps a separate question is better, especially since I've", "already accepted an answer. I don't mind just awarding the bounty now and", "anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide the entire story, then there shouldn't be", "a new question. Should I ask a separate question instead of awarding a", "then there shouldn't be any scientists who support Brexit. Since there are -", "bounty now and asking a new question. Should I ask a separate question", "scientists who support Brexit. Since there are - a minority, but still present", "However if the answers provide the entire story, then there shouldn't be any", "among all the answers. I've already started a bounty, but am having second", "perhaps a separate question is better, especially since I've already accepted an answer.", "notice: most of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide", "and asking a new question. Should I ask a separate question instead of", "bounty notice: most of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers", "passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide the entire story, then there shouldn't", "answers. I've already started a bounty, but am having second thoughts that perhaps", "there shouldn't be any scientists who support Brexit. Since there are - a", "suspect something is missing among all the answers. I've already started a bounty,", "shouldn't be any scientists who support Brexit. Since there are - a minority,", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in the bounty notice: most of the", "support Brexit. Since there are - a minority, but still present - I", "the entire story, then there shouldn't be any scientists who support Brexit. Since", "a minority, but still present - I suspect something is missing among all", "answers provide the entire story, then there shouldn't be any scientists who support", "if the answers provide the entire story, then there shouldn't be any scientists", "just awarding the bounty now and asking a new question. Should I ask", "I started a bounty recently for [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in", "but still present - I suspect something is missing among all the answers.", "an answer. I don't mind just awarding the bounty now and asking a", "minority, but still present - I suspect something is missing among all the", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in the bounty notice: most of the answers", "accepted an answer. I don't mind just awarding the bounty now and asking", "missing among all the answers. I've already started a bounty, but am having", "the answers provide the entire story, then there shouldn't be any scientists who", "there are - a minority, but still present - I suspect something is", "I've already started a bounty, but am having second thoughts that perhaps a", "entire story, then there shouldn't be any scientists who support Brexit. Since there", "I suspect something is missing among all the answers. I've already started a", "who support Brexit. Since there are - a minority, but still present -", "Since there are - a minority, but still present - I suspect something", "a bounty recently for [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in the bounty", "awarding the bounty now and asking a new question. Should I ask a", "reason is explained in the bounty notice: most of the answers are passionately", "I've already accepted an answer. I don't mind just awarding the bounty now", "- a minority, but still present - I suspect something is missing among", "provide the entire story, then there shouldn't be any scientists who support Brexit.", "the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide the entire story,", "that perhaps a separate question is better, especially since I've already accepted an", "most of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide the", "The reason is explained in the bounty notice: most of the answers are", "already started a bounty, but am having second thoughts that perhaps a separate", "is better, especially since I've already accepted an answer. I don't mind just", "better, especially since I've already accepted an answer. I don't mind just awarding", "am having second thoughts that perhaps a separate question is better, especially since", "bounty, but am having second thoughts that perhaps a separate question is better,", "second thoughts that perhaps a separate question is better, especially since I've already", "thoughts that perhaps a separate question is better, especially since I've already accepted", "recently for [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in the bounty notice: most", "answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide the entire story, then", "are - a minority, but still present - I suspect something is missing", "the bounty now and asking a new question. Should I ask a separate", "are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide the entire story, then there", "started a bounty, but am having second thoughts that perhaps a separate question", "present - I suspect something is missing among all the answers. I've already", "all the answers. I've already started a bounty, but am having second thoughts", "especially since I've already accepted an answer. I don't mind just awarding the", "in the bounty notice: most of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if", "be any scientists who support Brexit. Since there are - a minority, but", "question is better, especially since I've already accepted an answer. I don't mind", "I don't mind just awarding the bounty now and asking a new question.", "for [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in the bounty notice: most of", "since I've already accepted an answer. I don't mind just awarding the bounty", "is explained in the bounty notice: most of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit.", "Brexit. Since there are - a minority, but still present - I suspect", "explained in the bounty notice: most of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However", "of the answers are passionately anti-Brexit. However if the answers provide the entire", "started a bounty recently for [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/114135/why-do-most-scientists-think-brexit-is-bad-for-british-science). The reason is explained in the", "is missing among all the answers. I've already started a bounty, but am", "mind just awarding the bounty now and asking a new question. Should I", "separate question is better, especially since I've already accepted an answer. I don't", "a separate question is better, especially since I've already accepted an answer. I", "- I suspect something is missing among all the answers. I've already started", "asking a new question. Should I ask a separate question instead of awarding", "don't mind just awarding the bounty now and asking a new question. Should", "still present - I suspect something is missing among all the answers. I've" ]
[ "an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure", "view that is not presented in the other answers and in general goes", "a unique view that is not presented in the other answers and in", "I re-posted my previous answer with minor modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt", "represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted? I", "if it is really just a matter of different opinions from different moderators,", "field. For the same reason, I would be inclined to mention my gender", "wanted to make it clear \"moderation of these answers is not related to", "members of this community? Also, is there a way I can answer [Why", "is a misconception that women are underrepresented in science or STEM fields fields", "the current political climate. For the same reason, I deemed it necessary to", "answer as it was? Why all the hassle to rephrase the form of", "leaving out just a part of the answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces", "only some fields (with especifically computer science & engineering standing out) * Yes,", "misconceptions there are about gender inequality in STEM as a consequence of the", "my applications for tenure track job applications, especially with respect to positions in", "to post duplicate answers, and that I should \"tailor [my] answer to the", "an anonymous moderator about [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose", "reason, I would be inclined to mention my gender as a woman or", "I found the question [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure", "comment this time. Then I received PM from an anonymous moderator about [Could", "the question, which content must be removed to make the answer acceptable and", "beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and", "cases that I'm just not seeing? And if it is really just a", "in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in", "woman or my race if I were black or Hispanic. This too, of", "it is really just a matter of different opinions from different moderators, doesn't", "by a moderator in a very similar context in the very same community.", "new answer, referencing my answer to [Do all countries have the same gender", "question [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional", "roughly consistent for different countries. After updating my answer, I stumbled on the", "inclined to not mention race or gender on my applications for tenure track", "by explaining that in both cases I believe the exact same answer to", "differences are roughly consistent for different countries. After updating my answer, I stumbled", "them, but rather the generic information\". I responded to this message by explaining", "fine? Or if it's really just a matter of including content not relevant", "and realized that all of the three components of the aforementioned answer apply", "back up this position by a lot of data, with graphs & sources.", "this message by explaining that in both cases I believe the exact same", "previous answer with minor modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt that my answer", "gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even less represented in engineering", "found the question [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose my", "part of the answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces the quality of the", "of the the answer for both questions in both cases. I also asked", "have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my answer", "(with especifically computer science & engineering standing out) * Yes, this is a", "This too, of course, was backed up by sources (although less extensively). Then", "equally important, due to the numerous common misconceptions there are about gender inequality", "imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were left out. This answer was", "not seeing? And if it is really just a matter of different opinions", "rules need some revision towards greater objectivity? How is it acceptable that the", "three components of my answer sufficiently relevant to the question? Since I'm not", "as well to the same degree. So I re-posted my answer to this", "applications for tenure track job applications, especially with respect to positions in a", "[Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without", "may play a role at least as significant I believe each of the", "science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were left out. This answer was also deleted,", "well to the same degree. So I re-posted my answer to this question,", "a woman or my race if I were black or Hispanic. This too,", "believe that the deletion of my answer to [Why are women even less", "### Question(s) I find it hard to believe that the deletion of my", "data, graphs & sources as a response to a comment on that answer,", "represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter of", "post duplicate answers, and that I should \"tailor [my] answer to the specifics", "due to the numerous common misconceptions there are about gender inequality in STEM", "other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules of this community with respect to", "answers is not related to the views expressed in them, but rather the", "the high \"geek factor\" of those fields, but biological sex differences may play", "just a part of the answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces the quality", "African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions", "out) * Yes, this is a roughly consistent for different countries, although countries", "believe the exact same answer to be equally applicable to both questions, and", "related to the views expressed in them, but rather the generic information\". I", "same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my answer contains the", "my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally they would", "deleted? Would I need to find different data, different graphs & different sources", "Asian-Americans in college admissions * There are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the", "all the hassle to rephrase the form of an answer when the content", "gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer that basically contains", "countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted?", "the question [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job", "expressed in them. Can anyone explain to me why it's OK for [Could", "not to post duplicate answers, and that I should \"tailor [my] answer to", "same community. But let's just assume it isn't and the reason two different", "in an attempt to censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering a different decision", "argument? And if either of these would be acceptable, why not just allow", "male applicants * We also know that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored", "I re-posted my answer to this question, with minor modifications. Around the same", "of adding additional data, graphs & sources as a response to a comment", "by sources (although less extensively). Then I found the question [Should I disclose", "delete the duplicate answer\", but that they would not delete my answer in", "answer\", but that they would not delete my answer in this case because", "with additional information. Basically, my answer contains the following position : * It", "that is not presented in the other answers and in general goes against", "let's just assume it isn't and the reason two different answers to that", "This could be at least partially explained by gender stereotyping or the high", "answer getting deleted? Would I need to find different data, different graphs &", "So I re-posted my answer to this question, with minor modifications. Around the", "And if it is really just a matter of different opinions from different", "general goes against the majority view of the community\". Also, they wanted to", "I would be inclined to mention my gender as a woman or my", "number of women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation of jobs where", "even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from", "relevant information from my answer to [Do all countries have the same gender", "by the same moderator. No comment this time. Then I received PM from", "same reason, I would be inclined to mention my gender as a woman", "not presented in the other answers and in general goes against the majority", "answer are equally important, due to the numerous common misconceptions there are about", "form of an answer when the content itself is fine? Or if it's", "this is question is a suitable alternative approach for getting an answer to", "but rather the generic information\". I responded to this message by explaining that", "my answer, I stumbled on the question [Why are women even less represented", "with a comment not to post duplicate answers, and that I should \"tailor", "\"tailor [my] answer to the specifics of each question\". So I decided to", "same answer, but not for [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance", "is question is a suitable alternative approach for getting an answer to (at", "of the aforementioned answer apply here as well to the same degree. So", "to rephrase every paragraph to pretty much make the same argument? And if", "answer acceptable and on which grounds? How is not each of the three", "women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by", "whether a detailed answer backed up by ample sources ends up getting deleted?", "to the question, which content must be removed to make the answer acceptable", "mostly of adding additional data, graphs & sources as a response to a", "each of the three components of my answer sufficiently relevant to the question?", "the answer as it was? Why all the hassle to rephrase the form", "getting deleted? I received no response so far. --- ### Question(s) I find", "a way I can answer [Why are women even less represented in engineering", "the same degree. So I re-posted my answer to this question, with minor", "at least as significant I believe each of the three components of my", "the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted? Would I", "applications, especially with respect to positions in a STEM field. For the same", "is not presented in the other answers and in general goes against the", "There are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the number of women or \"minorities\"", "women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of", "applies to only some fields (with especifically computer science & engineering standing out)", "apply * Therefore, as a white male, I would be inclined to not", "to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that", "engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a", "this mean the community rules need some revision towards greater objectivity? How is", "has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual views expressed in them. Can", "the reason two different answers to that question are deleted has nothing whatsoever", "either of these would be acceptable, why not just allow the answer as", "same time, I found the question [Could it be beneficial for me to", "components of my answer are equally important, due to the numerous common misconceptions", "race or gender on my applications for tenure track job applications, especially with", "how I could answer [Why are women even less represented in engineering than", "engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted? I received no", "STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter of different moderators making different choices or", "IMO) significantly reduces the quality of the the answer for both questions in", "\"moderation of these answers is not related to the views expressed in them,", "I could answer [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in", "response to a comment on that answer, which - rightfully so - pointed", "over male applicants * We also know that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically", "gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact", "than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment", "of data, with graphs & sources. In fact, my update consisted mostly of", "creation of jobs where only women are allowed to apply * Therefore, as", "the views expressed in them, but rather the generic information\". I responded to", "attempt to censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering a different decision was made", "following position : * It is a misconception that women are underrepresented in", "imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my answer contains the following position", "the answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces the quality of the the answer", "the same time, I found the question [Could it be beneficial for me", "disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the", "answer getting deleted? I received no response so far. --- ### Question(s) I", "answer, I stumbled on the question [Why are women even less represented in", "the aforementioned answer apply here as well to the same degree. So I", "STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules of this community with respect to duplicate", "different decision was made by a moderator in a very similar context in", "are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted", "a very similar context in the very same community. But let's just assume", "are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my", "### Context I recently updated my answer to the question [Do all countries", "STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to post", "science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted? Would I need to find different data,", "So I decided to remove the least relevant details of my answer and", "different moderators making different choices or is there a difference between both cases", "up by ample sources ends up getting deleted? How is that fair to", "application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job", "just a matter of different opinions from different moderators, doesn't this mean the", "than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted? I received no response", "same argument? And if either of these would be acceptable, why not just", "other answers and in general goes against the majority view of the community\".", "was made by a moderator in a very similar context in the very", "are allowed to apply * Therefore, as a white male, I would be", "and that I should \"tailor [my] answer to the specifics of each question\".", "all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting", "least IMO) significantly reduces the quality of the the answer for both questions", "re-post the remaining part of my answer as a new answer, referencing my", "for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should", "they would \"just delete the duplicate answer\", but that they would not delete", "all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women", "explaining that in both cases I believe the exact same answer to be", "for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I", "How is it acceptable that the personal opinion of one moderator determines whether", "answer when the content itself is fine? Or if it's really just a", "answer sufficiently relevant to the question? Since I'm not confident I'll receive a", "a detailed answer backed up by ample sources ends up getting deleted? How", "- pointed out that I insufficiently backed up that gender differences are roughly", "in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my answer to [Do all countries", "could be at least partially explained by gender stereotyping or the high \"geek", "I were black or Hispanic. This too, of course, was backed up by", "stumbled on the question [Why are women even less represented in engineering than", "it clear \"moderation of these answers is not related to the views expressed", "that I insufficiently backed up that gender differences are roughly consistent for different", "each question\". So I decided to remove the least relevant details of my", "answer and re-post the remaining part of my answer as a new answer,", "I should \"tailor [my] answer to the specifics of each question\". So I", "data, different graphs & different sources to pretty much demonstrate the same argument?", "much make the same argument? And if either of these would be acceptable,", "numerous common misconceptions there are about gender inequality in STEM as a consequence", "up that gender differences are roughly consistent for different countries. After updating my", "exact same components apply. So here, too, I re-posted my previous answer with", "an attempt to censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering a different decision was", "I received no response so far. --- ### Question(s) I find it hard", "can answer [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other", "question is a suitable alternative approach for getting an answer to (at least", "REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer that basically contains the following position", "female applicants over male applicants * We also know that African-Americans & Hispanics", "deleted? How is that fair to the members of this community? Also, is", "an answer when the content itself is fine? Or if it's really just", "I'll receive a response to my PM, I suppose this is question is", "positions in a STEM field. For the same reason, I would be inclined", "asked how I could answer [Why are women even less represented in engineering", "* We also know that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans", "to a comment on that answer, which - rightfully so - pointed out", ": * It is a misconception that women are underrepresented in science or", "me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me", "just a matter of including content not relevant enough to the question, which", "STEM field. For the same reason, I would be inclined to mention my", "in general goes against the majority view of the community\". Also, they wanted", "views expressed in them. Can anyone explain to me why it's OK for", "So here, too, I re-posted my previous answer with minor modifications. --- ###", "campaigns worldwide to increase the number of women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including", "moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to post duplicate answers, and that I", "other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted? I received no response so far.", "or the high \"geek factor\" of those fields, but biological sex differences may", "doesn't this mean the community rules need some revision towards greater objectivity? How", "[Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer", "of these would be acceptable, why not just allow the answer as it", "assume it isn't and the reason two different answers to that question are", "in a STEM field. For the same reason, I would be inclined to", "again the exact same components apply. So here, too, I re-posted my previous", "* There are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the number of women or", "view of the community\". Also, they wanted to make it clear \"moderation of", "women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just", "made by a moderator in a very similar context in the very same", "just not seeing? And if it is really just a matter of different", "a lot of data, with graphs & sources. In fact, my update consisted", "I find it hard to believe that the deletion of my answer to", "from an anonymous moderator about [Could it be beneficial for me to not", "is that fair to the members of this community? Also, is there a", "to make it clear \"moderation of these answers is not related to the", "partially explained by gender stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\" of those fields,", "[my] answer to the specifics of each question\". So I decided to remove", "[Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where", "cases. I also asked how I could answer [Why are women even less", "an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer that basically contains the following", "normally they would \"just delete the duplicate answer\", but that they would not", "suitable alternative approach for getting an answer to (at least some of) those", "a comment not to post duplicate answers, and that I should \"tailor [my]", "about [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in", "to duplicate content in an attempt to censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering", "gap * This could be at least partially explained by gender stereotyping or", "the same reason, I would be inclined to mention my gender as a", "[Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an", "minor modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt that my answer to [Why are", "left out. This answer was also deleted, by the same moderator. No comment", "answer, referencing my answer to [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance", "In fact, my update consisted mostly of adding additional data, graphs & sources", "I also asked how I could answer [Why are women even less represented", "[Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and", "in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted? Would I need to find different", "etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same answer, but", "For the same reason, I deemed it necessary to back up this position", "less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules", "mention race or gender on my applications for tenure track job applications, especially", "mean the community rules need some revision towards greater objectivity? How is it", "pointed out that I insufficiently backed up that gender differences are roughly consistent", "ironically - have a greater gender gap * This could be at least", "information\". I responded to this message by explaining that in both cases I", "[Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details", "engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules of this community", "revision towards greater objectivity? How is it acceptable that the personal opinion of", "countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were", "the number of women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation of jobs", "of different opinions from different moderators, doesn't this mean the community rules need", "this is a roughly consistent for different countries, although countries with greater gender", "even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the", "track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same components apply. So here, too,", "not relevant enough to the question, which content must be removed to make", "track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same answer, but not for [Do", "to do with the actual views expressed in them. Can anyone explain to", "would be inclined to not mention race or gender on my applications for", "of an answer when the content itself is fine? Or if it's really", "my PM, I suppose this is question is a suitable alternative approach for", "make the same argument? And if either of these would be acceptable, why", "I stumbled on the question [Why are women even less represented in engineering", "as a woman or my race if I were black or Hispanic. This", "answer backed up by ample sources ends up getting deleted? How is that", "gender on my applications for tenure track job applications, especially with respect to", "countries, although countries with greater gender equality - ironically - have a greater", "message by explaining that in both cases I believe the exact same answer", "content in an attempt to censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering a different", "are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the number of women or \"minorities\" in", "less extensively). Then I found the question [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities", "a response to my PM, I suppose this is question is a suitable", "fields (with especifically computer science & engineering standing out) * Yes, this is", "with greater gender equality - ironically - have a greater gender gap ", "not mention race or gender on my applications for tenure track job applications,", "disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally they", "relevant details of my answer and re-post the remaining part of my answer", "these answers is not related to the views expressed in them, but rather", "me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I", "in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules of this community with respect", "to the same degree. So I re-posted my answer to this question, with", "do with the actual views expressed in them. Can anyone explain to me", "too, I re-posted my previous answer with minor modifications. --- ### Problem I", "numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the number of women or \"minorities\" in STEM,", "STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted? I received no response so far. ---", "far. --- ### Question(s) I find it hard to believe that the deletion", " Therefore, as a white male, I would be inclined to not mention", "remaining part of my answer as a new answer, referencing my answer to", "in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not", "applicable to both questions, and that leaving out just a part of the", "some revision towards greater objectivity? How is it acceptable that the personal opinion", "same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted? Would I need", "to that question are deleted has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual", "answer that basically contains the following position : * We know that women", "in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in", "male, I would be inclined to not mention race or gender on my", "in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted? I received", "different opinions from different moderators, doesn't this mean the community rules need some", "to only some fields (with especifically computer science & engineering standing out) ", "sources as a response to a comment on that answer, which - rightfully", "aforementioned answer apply here as well to the same degree. So I re-posted", "a white male, I would be inclined to not mention race or gender", "in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter of different moderators making different", "European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions There are numerous campaigns worldwide to", "in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my answer to", "disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same components", "to rephrase the form of an answer when the content itself is fine?", "from different moderators, doesn't this mean the community rules need some revision towards", "different moderators, doesn't this mean the community rules need some revision towards greater", "less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter", "the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my answer contains", "exact same answer to be equally applicable to both questions, and that leaving", "is it acceptable that the personal opinion of one moderator determines whether a", "this case because it \"presents a unique view that is not presented in", "it's OK for [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose my", "need to rephrase every paragraph to pretty much make the same argument? And", "less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of", "answer in this case because it \"presents a unique view that is not", "They told me that normally they would \"just delete the duplicate answer\", but", "it be beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU", "application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer that basically contains the following position :", "question [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447),", "Or if it's really just a matter of including content not relevant enough", "position by a lot of data, with graphs & sources. In fact, my", "additional information. Basically, my answer contains the following position : * It is", "in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter of different", "it \"presents a unique view that is not presented in the other answers", "my answer are equally important, due to the numerous common misconceptions there are", "I would be inclined to not mention race or gender on my applications", "my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities", "I'm not confident I'll receive a response to my PM, I suppose this", "are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized", "reason two different answers to that question are deleted has nothing whatsoever to", "stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\" of those fields, but biological sex differences", "black or Hispanic. This too, of course, was backed up by sources (although", "fields in general, as this applies to only some fields (with especifically computer", "there are about gender inequality in STEM as a consequence of the current", "with the actual views expressed in them. Can anyone explain to me why", "me why it's OK for [Could it be beneficial for me to not", "be inclined to not mention race or gender on my applications for tenure", "I can answer [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in", "acceptable, why not just allow the answer as it was? Why all the", "factor\" of those fields, but biological sex differences may play a role at", "answer to this question, with minor modifications. Around the same time, I found", "course, was backed up by sources (although less extensively). Then I found the", "I believe each of the three components of my answer are equally important,", "equality - ironically - have a greater gender gap * This could be", "& Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions ", "are deleted has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual views expressed in", "Also, is there a way I can answer [Why are women even less", "it's really just a matter of including content not relevant enough to the", "some fields (with especifically computer science & engineering standing out) Yes, this", "gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted? Would I need to", "Here, I posted an answer that basically contains the following position : ", "that the deletion of my answer to [Why are women even less represented", "relevant to the question? Since I'm not confident I'll receive a response to", "including content not relevant enough to the question, which content must be removed", "REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track", "a matter of different opinions from different moderators, doesn't this mean the community", "including the creation of jobs where only women are allowed to apply ", "to not mention race or gender on my applications for tenure track job", "demonstrate the same argument? Would I need to rephrase every paragraph to pretty", "even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all", "be inclined to mention my gender as a woman or my race if", "my race if I were black or Hispanic. This too, of course, was", "is there a way I can answer [Why are women even less represented", "pretty much demonstrate the same argument? Would I need to rephrase every paragraph", "three components of my answer are equally important, due to the numerous common", "apply here as well to the same degree. So I re-posted my answer", "details that were left out. This answer was also deleted, by the same", "answer [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)", "I responded to this message by explaining that in both cases I believe", "responded to this message by explaining that in both cases I believe the", "of the three components of my answer sufficiently relevant to the question? Since", "that the personal opinion of one moderator determines whether a detailed answer backed", "confident I'll receive a response to my PM, I suppose this is question", "the same moderator. No comment this time. Then I received PM from an", "that women that faculty members generally prefer female applicants over male applicants ", "prefer female applicants over male applicants We also know that African-Americans &", "not related to the views expressed in them, but rather the generic information\".", "the the answer for both questions in both cases. I also asked how", "and the reason two different answers to that question are deleted has nothing", "I need to find different data, different graphs & different sources to pretty", "the actual views expressed in them. Can anyone explain to me why it's", "I insufficiently backed up that gender differences are roughly consistent for different countries.", "other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of the three components of the aforementioned", "using relevant information from my answer to [Do all countries have the same", "which content must be removed to make the answer acceptable and on which", "OK for [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity", "one moderator determines whether a detailed answer backed up by ample sources ends", "gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc.", "answer to the question [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in", "really just a matter of different opinions from different moderators, doesn't this mean", "STEM fields fields in general, as this applies to only some fields (with", "learnt that my answer to [Why are women even less represented in engineering", "differences may play a role at least as significant I believe each of", "women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation of jobs where only women", "if I were black or Hispanic. This too, of course, was backed up", "not for [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and", "Problem I learnt that my answer to [Why are women even less represented", "* Yes, this is a roughly consistent for different countries, although countries with", "to pretty much make the same argument? And if either of these would", "find it hard to believe that the deletion of my answer to [Why", "a roughly consistent for different countries, although countries with greater gender equality -", "but not for [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081)", "and re-post the remaining part of my answer as a new answer, referencing", "is not each of the three components of my answer sufficiently relevant to", "getting deleted? How is that fair to the members of this community? Also,", "to the question [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081)", "generally prefer female applicants over male applicants * We also know that African-Americans", "minor modifications. Around the same time, I found the question [Could it be", "of the three components of my answer are equally important, due to the", "necessary to back up this position by a lot of data, with graphs", "decision was made by a moderator in a very similar context in the", "Would I need to rephrase every paragraph to pretty much make the same", "applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same components apply. So here, too, I re-posted", "Is it just a matter of different moderators making different choices or is", "different countries. After updating my answer, I stumbled on the question [Why are", "reason, I deemed it necessary to back up this position by a lot", "with minor modifications. Around the same time, I found the question [Could it", "roughly the same answer, but not for [Do all countries have the same", "(although less extensively). Then I found the question [Should I disclose gender, race,", "I recently updated my answer to the question [Do all countries have the", "out just a part of the answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces the", "moderator determines whether a detailed answer backed up by ample sources ends up", "backed up that gender differences are roughly consistent for different countries. After updating", "in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same answer, but not", "over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions * There are numerous campaigns worldwide", "I decided to remove the least relevant details of my answer and re-post", "not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer", "know that women that faculty members generally prefer female applicants over male applicants", "question, with minor modifications. Around the same time, I found the question [Could", "significantly reduces the quality of the the answer for both questions in both", "question are deleted has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual views expressed", "acceptable that the personal opinion of one moderator determines whether a detailed answer", "STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of the three components of the aforementioned answer", "job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same components apply. So here, too, I", "be removed to make the answer acceptable and on which grounds? How is", "the community\". Also, they wanted to make it clear \"moderation of these answers", "the same argument? And if either of these would be acceptable, why not", "have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted? Would", "respect to duplicate content in an attempt to censor an unpopular opinion, especially", "my answer in this case because it \"presents a unique view that is", "inequality in STEM as a consequence of the current political climate. For the", "same moderator. No comment this time. Then I received PM from an anonymous", "that in both cases I believe the exact same answer to be equally", "answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces the quality of the the answer for", "science or STEM fields fields in general, as this applies to only some", "to remove the least relevant details of my answer and re-post the remaining", "disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer that", "re-posted my previous answer with minor modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt that", "the deletion of my answer to [Why are women even less represented in", "my answer to [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in", "me that normally they would \"just delete the duplicate answer\", but that they", "and that leaving out just a part of the answer (at least IMO)", "also asked how I could answer [Why are women even less represented in", "greater gender gap * This could be at least partially explained by gender", "when the content itself is fine? Or if it's really just a matter", "roughly consistent for different countries, although countries with greater gender equality - ironically", "the exact same components apply. So here, too, I re-posted my previous answer", "a greater gender gap * This could be at least partially explained by", "nothing whatsoever to do with the actual views expressed in them. Can anyone", "pretty much make the same argument? And if either of these would be", "especifically computer science & engineering standing out) * Yes, this is a roughly", "represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of the", "answers and in general goes against the majority view of the community\". Also,", "that women are underrepresented in science or STEM fields fields in general, as", "expressed in them, but rather the generic information\". I responded to this message", "represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules of", "the question [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity", "position : * It is a misconception that women are underrepresented in science", "argument? Would I need to rephrase every paragraph to pretty much make the", "in STEM, including the creation of jobs where only women are allowed to", "of jobs where only women are allowed to apply * Therefore, as a", "three components of the aforementioned answer apply here as well to the same", "both cases that I'm just not seeing? And if it is really just", "realized that all of the three components of the aforementioned answer apply here", "a STEM field. For the same reason, I would be inclined to mention", "without my answer getting deleted? I received no response so far. --- ###", "my answer getting deleted? Would I need to find different data, different graphs", "the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were left out.", "the generic information\". I responded to this message by explaining that in both", "different countries, although countries with greater gender equality - ironically - have a", "comment not to post duplicate answers, and that I should \"tailor [my] answer", "would be acceptable, why not just allow the answer as it was? Why", "in science or STEM fields fields in general, as this applies to only", "After updating my answer, I stumbled on the question [Why are women even", "a misconception that women are underrepresented in science or STEM fields fields in", "especially considering a different decision was made by a moderator in a very", "each of the three components of my answer are equally important, due to", "extensively). Then I found the question [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc.", "that leaving out just a part of the answer (at least IMO) significantly", "really just a matter of including content not relevant enough to the question,", "referencing my answer to [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in", "\"geek factor\" of those fields, but biological sex differences may play a role", "where again the exact same components apply. So here, too, I re-posted my", "in the very same community. But let's just assume it isn't and the", "similar context in the very same community. But let's just assume it isn't", "it isn't and the reason two different answers to that question are deleted", "the same argument? Would I need to rephrase every paragraph to pretty much", "underrepresented in science or STEM fields fields in general, as this applies to", "\"just delete the duplicate answer\", but that they would not delete my answer", "countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my", "play a role at least as significant I believe each of the three", "to apply * Therefore, as a white male, I would be inclined to", "the content itself is fine? Or if it's really just a matter of", "this community? Also, is there a way I can answer [Why are women", "be equally applicable to both questions, and that leaving out just a part", "anyone explain to me why it's OK for [Could it be beneficial for", "community\". Also, they wanted to make it clear \"moderation of these answers is", "be at least partially explained by gender stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\"", "adding additional data, graphs & sources as a response to a comment on", "of women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation of jobs where only", "content itself is fine? Or if it's really just a matter of including", "these would be acceptable, why not just allow the answer as it was?", "alternative approach for getting an answer to (at least some of) those questions.", "of each question\". So I decided to remove the least relevant details of", "How is that fair to the members of this community? Also, is there", "it necessary to back up this position by a lot of data, with", "countries with greater gender equality - ironically - have a greater gender gap", "opinion, especially considering a different decision was made by a moderator in a", "it was? Why all the hassle to rephrase the form of an answer", "Hispanic. This too, of course, was backed up by sources (although less extensively).", "was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to post duplicate", "to the specifics of each question\". So I decided to remove the least", "* This could be at least partially explained by gender stereotyping or the", "in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules of this", "least relevant details of my answer and re-post the remaining part of my", "of this community? Also, is there a way I can answer [Why are", "unpopular opinion, especially considering a different decision was made by a moderator in", "all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically,", "STEM as a consequence of the current political climate. For the same reason,", "that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college", "same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even less represented in", "question? Since I'm not confident I'll receive a response to my PM, I", "in this case because it \"presents a unique view that is not presented", "Basically, my answer contains the following position : * It is a misconception", "getting deleted? Would I need to find different data, different graphs & different", "or Hispanic. This too, of course, was backed up by sources (although less", "as significant I believe each of the three components of my answer are", "deleted, by the same moderator. No comment this time. Then I received PM", "of my answer to [Why are women even less represented in engineering than", "too, of course, was backed up by sources (although less extensively). Then I", "of those fields, but biological sex differences may play a role at least", "is a roughly consistent for different countries, although countries with greater gender equality", "than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse of the rules of this community with", "of my answer sufficiently relevant to the question? Since I'm not confident I'll", "job applications, especially with respect to positions in a STEM field. For the", "Yes, this is a roughly consistent for different countries, although countries with greater", "for the details that were left out. This answer was also deleted, by", "no response so far. --- ### Question(s) I find it hard to believe", "the least relevant details of my answer and re-post the remaining part of", "in them, but rather the generic information\". I responded to this message by", "to this message by explaining that in both cases I believe the exact", "graphs & sources. In fact, my update consisted mostly of adding additional data,", "both cases I believe the exact same answer to be equally applicable to", "women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that", "generic information\". I responded to this message by explaining that in both cases", "against the majority view of the community\". Also, they wanted to make it", "Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions * There", "determines whether a detailed answer backed up by ample sources ends up getting", "was also deleted, by the same moderator. No comment this time. Then I", "components of my answer sufficiently relevant to the question? Since I'm not confident", "isn't and the reason two different answers to that question are deleted has", "biological sex differences may play a role at least as significant I believe", "in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my answer contains the following position :", "allowed to apply * Therefore, as a white male, I would be inclined", "inclined to mention my gender as a woman or my race if I", "choices or is there a difference between both cases that I'm just not", "other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to", "this question, with minor modifications. Around the same time, I found the question", "faculty members generally prefer female applicants over male applicants * We also know", "\"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation of jobs where only women are allowed", "are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant", "tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same answer, but not for", "that all of the three components of the aforementioned answer apply here as", "gender inequality in STEM as a consequence of the current political climate. For", "or my race if I were black or Hispanic. This too, of course,", "answer with minor modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt that my answer to", "that question are deleted has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual views", "even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting", "content not relevant enough to the question, which content must be removed to", "Therefore, as a white male, I would be inclined to not mention race", "the following position : * We know that women that faculty members generally", "my answer getting deleted? I received no response so far. --- ### Question(s)", "to find different data, different graphs & different sources to pretty much demonstrate", "posted an answer that basically contains the following position : * We know", "both questions, and that leaving out just a part of the answer (at", "contains the following position : * We know that women that faculty members", "countries. After updating my answer, I stumbled on the question [Why are women", "in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer that basically contains the", "but that they would not delete my answer in this case because it", "detailed answer backed up by ample sources ends up getting deleted? How is", "backed up by sources (although less extensively). Then I found the question [Should", "I'm just not seeing? And if it is really just a matter of", "as this applies to only some fields (with especifically computer science & engineering", "in the other answers and in general goes against the majority view of", "the creation of jobs where only women are allowed to apply * Therefore,", "a role at least as significant I believe each of the three components", "in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted? I received no response so", "fields, but biological sex differences may play a role at least as significant", "to [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the", "information. Basically, my answer contains the following position : * It is a", "for different countries, although countries with greater gender equality - ironically - have", "gender stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\" of those fields, but biological sex", "answers, and that I should \"tailor [my] answer to the specifics of each", "moderator. No comment this time. Then I received PM from an anonymous moderator", "& sources. In fact, my update consisted mostly of adding additional data, graphs", "for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told", "a difference between both cases that I'm just not seeing? And if it", "position : * We know that women that faculty members generally prefer female", "that fair to the members of this community? Also, is there a way", "[Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using", "an unpopular opinion, especially considering a different decision was made by a moderator", "application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally they would \"just delete the duplicate answer\",", "as it was? Why all the hassle to rephrase the form of an", "that normally they would \"just delete the duplicate answer\", but that they would", "my answer sufficiently relevant to the question? Since I'm not confident I'll receive", "job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same answer, but not for [Do all", "I found the question [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose", "climate. For the same reason, I deemed it necessary to back up this", "with respect to positions in a STEM field. For the same reason, I", "jobs where only women are allowed to apply * Therefore, as a white", "personal opinion of one moderator determines whether a detailed answer backed up by", "sufficiently relevant to the question? Since I'm not confident I'll receive a response", "I received PM from an anonymous moderator about [Could it be beneficial for", "as a consequence of the current political climate. For the same reason, I", "(at least IMO) significantly reduces the quality of the the answer for both", "should \"tailor [my] answer to the specifics of each question\". So I decided", "to have roughly the same answer, but not for [Do all countries have", "is fine? Or if it's really just a matter of including content not", "to my PM, I suppose this is question is a suitable alternative approach", "least partially explained by gender stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\" of those", "this position by a lot of data, with graphs & sources. In fact,", "Context I recently updated my answer to the question [Do all countries have", "I believe the exact same answer to be equally applicable to both questions,", "about gender inequality in STEM as a consequence of the current political climate.", "of the three components of the aforementioned answer apply here as well to", "of one moderator determines whether a detailed answer backed up by ample sources", "- ironically - have a greater gender gap * This could be at", "which grounds? How is not each of the three components of my answer", "applicants over male applicants * We also know that African-Americans & Hispanics are", "have a greater gender gap * This could be at least partially explained", "of my answer are equally important, due to the numerous common misconceptions there", "here as well to the same degree. So I re-posted my answer to", "[Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information.", "are equally important, due to the numerous common misconceptions there are about gender", "two different answers to that question are deleted has nothing whatsoever to do", "relevant enough to the question, which content must be removed to make the", "duplicate answers, and that I should \"tailor [my] answer to the specifics of", "remove the least relevant details of my answer and re-post the remaining part", "in both cases I believe the exact same answer to be equally applicable", "my answer to the question [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance", "same answer to be equally applicable to both questions, and that leaving out", "delete my answer in this case because it \"presents a unique view that", "by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to post duplicate answers, and", "same components apply. So here, too, I re-posted my previous answer with minor", "[Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't", "ample sources ends up getting deleted? How is that fair to the members", "the majority view of the community\". Also, they wanted to make it clear", "science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my answer contains the following position : ", "in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same components apply. So", "to [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my", "race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same", "if either of these would be acceptable, why not just allow the answer", "applicants We also know that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored over", "there a difference between both cases that I'm just not seeing? And if", "graphs & different sources to pretty much demonstrate the same argument? Would I", "than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of the three components of", "for [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why", "a suitable alternative approach for getting an answer to (at least some of)", "important, due to the numerous common misconceptions there are about gender inequality in", "just a matter of different moderators making different choices or is there a", "time. Then I received PM from an anonymous moderator about [Could it be", "--- ### Problem I learnt that my answer to [Why are women even", "answer was also deleted, by the same moderator. No comment this time. Then", "to mention my gender as a woman or my race if I were", "the answer for both questions in both cases. I also asked how I", "told me that normally they would \"just delete the duplicate answer\", but that", "have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were left", "at least partially explained by gender stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\" of", "gender differences are roughly consistent for different countries. After updating my answer, I", "to positions in a STEM field. For the same reason, I would be", "a matter of different moderators making different choices or is there a difference", "to make the answer acceptable and on which grounds? How is not each", "following position : * We know that women that faculty members generally prefer", "mention my gender as a woman or my race if I were black", "would be inclined to mention my gender as a woman or my race", "contains the following position : * It is a misconception that women are", "moderator about [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity", "was? Why all the hassle to rephrase the form of an answer when", "that they would not delete my answer in this case because it \"presents", "have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even less", "the rules of this community with respect to duplicate content in an attempt", "that were left out. This answer was also deleted, by the same moderator.", "matter of different opinions from different moderators, doesn't this mean the community rules", "because it \"presents a unique view that is not presented in the other", "We know that women that faculty members generally prefer female applicants over male", "equally applicable to both questions, and that leaving out just a part of", "without my answer getting deleted? Would I need to find different data, different", "How is not each of the three components of my answer sufficiently relevant", "women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer", "high \"geek factor\" of those fields, but biological sex differences may play a", "details of my answer and re-post the remaining part of my answer as", "my previous answer with minor modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt that my", "allow the answer as it was? Why all the hassle to rephrase the", "tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same components apply. So here,", "to back up this position by a lot of data, with graphs &", "greater gender equality - ironically - have a greater gender gap * This", "standing out) * Yes, this is a roughly consistent for different countries, although", "is a suitable alternative approach for getting an answer to (at least some", "women are underrepresented in science or STEM fields fields in general, as this", "[Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was", "the question [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other", "be beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448).", "science & engineering standing out) * Yes, this is a roughly consistent for", "questions in both cases. I also asked how I could answer [Why are", "insufficiently backed up that gender differences are roughly consistent for different countries. After", "question [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in", "not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally", "to censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering a different decision was made by", "with minor modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt that my answer to [Why", "have roughly the same answer, but not for [Do all countries have the", "matter of including content not relevant enough to the question, which content must", "removed to make the answer acceptable and on which grounds? How is not", "up by sources (although less extensively). Then I found the question [Should I", "my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an answer that basically", "beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here,", "same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were left out. This", "admissions * There are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the number of women", "women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information", "to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted an", "engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of the three components", "although countries with greater gender equality - ironically - have a greater gender", "hard to believe that the deletion of my answer to [Why are women", "rephrase the form of an answer when the content itself is fine? Or", "- rightfully so - pointed out that I insufficiently backed up that gender", "to increase the number of women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation", "the numerous common misconceptions there are about gender inequality in STEM as a", "the following position : * It is a misconception that women are underrepresented", "deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to post duplicate answers,", "Since I'm not confident I'll receive a response to my PM, I suppose", "where only women are allowed to apply * Therefore, as a white male,", "members generally prefer female applicants over male applicants * We also know that", "received PM from an anonymous moderator about [Could it be beneficial for me", "current political climate. For the same reason, I deemed it necessary to back", "that I should \"tailor [my] answer to the specifics of each question\". So", "in both cases. I also asked how I could answer [Why are women", "my answer and re-post the remaining part of my answer as a new", "with respect to duplicate content in an attempt to censor an unpopular opinion,", "misconception that women are underrepresented in science or STEM fields fields in general,", "sources ends up getting deleted? How is that fair to the members of", "here, too, I re-posted my previous answer with minor modifications. --- ### Problem", "itself is fine? Or if it's really just a matter of including content", "disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender, race,", "answer to be equally applicable to both questions, and that leaving out just", "response to my PM, I suppose this is question is a suitable alternative", "college admissions * There are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the number of", "just allow the answer as it was? Why all the hassle to rephrase", "a new answer, referencing my answer to [Do all countries have the same", "Then I received PM from an anonymous moderator about [Could it be beneficial", "than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my answer to [Do all", "engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my answer to [Do", "answer, which - rightfully so - pointed out that I insufficiently backed up", "a response to a comment on that answer, which - rightfully so -", "* We know that women that faculty members generally prefer female applicants over", "for tenure track job applications, especially with respect to positions in a STEM", "It is a misconception that women are underrepresented in science or STEM fields", "sex differences may play a role at least as significant I believe each", "consistent for different countries. After updating my answer, I stumbled on the question", "are about gender inequality in STEM as a consequence of the current political", "found the question [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track", "me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). Here, I posted", "engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter of different moderators", "duplicate content in an attempt to censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering a", "political climate. For the same reason, I deemed it necessary to back up", "on that answer, which - rightfully so - pointed out that I insufficiently", "of including content not relevant enough to the question, which content must be", "I need to rephrase every paragraph to pretty much make the same argument?", "receive a response to my PM, I suppose this is question is a", "both questions in both cases. I also asked how I could answer [Why", "questions, and that leaving out just a part of the answer (at least", "my answer as a new answer, referencing my answer to [Do all countries", "are typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions * There are", "of the answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces the quality of the the", "whatsoever to do with the actual views expressed in them. Can anyone explain", "just assume it isn't and the reason two different answers to that question", "No comment this time. Then I received PM from an anonymous moderator about", "towards greater objectivity? How is it acceptable that the personal opinion of one", "the community rules need some revision towards greater objectivity? How is it acceptable", "content must be removed to make the answer acceptable and on which grounds?", "community. But let's just assume it isn't and the reason two different answers", "the quality of the the answer for both questions in both cases. I", "for [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in", "or is there a difference between both cases that I'm just not seeing?", "grounds? How is not each of the three components of my answer sufficiently", "which - rightfully so - pointed out that I insufficiently backed up that", "- have a greater gender gap * This could be at least partially", "received no response so far. --- ### Question(s) I find it hard to", "deletion of my answer to [Why are women even less represented in engineering", "rightfully so - pointed out that I insufficiently backed up that gender differences", "isn't abuse of the rules of this community with respect to duplicate content", "find different data, different graphs & different sources to pretty much demonstrate the", "community with respect to duplicate content in an attempt to censor an unpopular", "unique view that is not presented in the other answers and in general", "in a very similar context in the very same community. But let's just", "imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even less represented in engineering than", "opinions from different moderators, doesn't this mean the community rules need some revision", "answer, but not for [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in", "matter of different moderators making different choices or is there a difference between", "anonymous moderator about [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose my", "different choices or is there a difference between both cases that I'm just", "role at least as significant I believe each of the three components of", "as a response to a comment on that answer, which - rightfully so", "for both questions in both cases. I also asked how I could answer", "views expressed in them, but rather the generic information\". I responded to this", "were black or Hispanic. This too, of course, was backed up by sources", "REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally they would \"just delete the duplicate", "my update consisted mostly of adding additional data, graphs & sources as a", "they wanted to make it clear \"moderation of these answers is not related", "up this position by a lot of data, with graphs & sources. In", "abuse of the rules of this community with respect to duplicate content in", "seeing? And if it is really just a matter of different opinions from", "they would not delete my answer in this case because it \"presents a", "science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other", "this applies to only some fields (with especifically computer science & engineering standing", "on my applications for tenure track job applications, especially with respect to positions", "a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to post duplicate answers, and that", "in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally they would \"just delete", "question\". So I decided to remove the least relevant details of my answer", "### Problem I learnt that my answer to [Why are women even less", "information from my answer to [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance", "suppose this is question is a suitable alternative approach for getting an answer", "general, as this applies to only some fields (with especifically computer science &", "all of the three components of the aforementioned answer apply here as well", "the question? Since I'm not confident I'll receive a response to my PM,", "fields fields in general, as this applies to only some fields (with especifically", "decided to remove the least relevant details of my answer and re-post the", "all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that", "to the views expressed in them, but rather the generic information\". I responded", "an answer that basically contains the following position : * We know that", "to both questions, and that leaving out just a part of the answer", "the three components of the aforementioned answer apply here as well to the", "answer to [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without", "or STEM fields fields in general, as this applies to only some fields", "that my answer to [Why are women even less represented in engineering than", "women that faculty members generally prefer female applicants over male applicants * We", "but biological sex differences may play a role at least as significant I", "degree. So I re-posted my answer to this question, with minor modifications. Around", "disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same answer,", "a part of the answer (at least IMO) significantly reduces the quality of", "also know that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans", "would \"just delete the duplicate answer\", but that they would not delete my", "in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were left out. This answer was also", "Also, they wanted to make it clear \"moderation of these answers is not", "considering a different decision was made by a moderator in a very similar", "a moderator in a very similar context in the very same community. But", "or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation of jobs where only women are", "of my answer and re-post the remaining part of my answer as a", "of different moderators making different choices or is there a difference between both", "and [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)?", "with graphs & sources. In fact, my update consisted mostly of adding additional", "sources to pretty much demonstrate the same argument? Would I need to rephrase", "women are allowed to apply * Therefore, as a white male, I would", "consistent for different countries, although countries with greater gender equality - ironically -", "to this question, with minor modifications. Around the same time, I found the", "case because it \"presents a unique view that is not presented in the", "update consisted mostly of adding additional data, graphs & sources as a response", "the details that were left out. This answer was also deleted, by the", "of the rules of this community with respect to duplicate content in an", "tenure track job applications, especially with respect to positions in a STEM field.", "there a way I can answer [Why are women even less represented in", "rules of this community with respect to duplicate content in an attempt to", "typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions * There are numerous", "my answer contains the following position : * It is a misconception that", "the hassle to rephrase the form of an answer when the content itself", "gender as a woman or my race if I were black or Hispanic.", "I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again", "so far. --- ### Question(s) I find it hard to believe that the", "reduces the quality of the the answer for both questions in both cases.", "is not related to the views expressed in them, but rather the generic", "the very same community. But let's just assume it isn't and the reason", "the three components of my answer are equally important, due to the numerous", "why it's OK for [Could it be beneficial for me to not disclose", "by gender stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\" of those fields, but biological", "respect to positions in a STEM field. For the same reason, I would", "fair to the members of this community? Also, is there a way I", "graphs & sources as a response to a comment on that answer, which", "answer as a new answer, referencing my answer to [Do all countries have", "Around the same time, I found the question [Could it be beneficial for", "increase the number of women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the creation of", "lot of data, with graphs & sources. In fact, my update consisted mostly", "& engineering standing out) * Yes, this is a roughly consistent for different", "For the same reason, I would be inclined to mention my gender as", "I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have", "it just a matter of different moderators making different choices or is there", "gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with additional information. Basically, my answer contains the following", "are roughly consistent for different countries. After updating my answer, I stumbled on", "duplicate answer\", but that they would not delete my answer in this case", "to pretty much demonstrate the same argument? Would I need to rephrase every", "computer science & engineering standing out) * Yes, this is a roughly consistent", "& sources as a response to a comment on that answer, which -", "I deemed it necessary to back up this position by a lot of", "race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same", "so - pointed out that I insufficiently backed up that gender differences are", "that answer, which - rightfully so - pointed out that I insufficiently backed", "in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of the three components of the", "were left out. This answer was also deleted, by the same moderator. No", "gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the", "different sources to pretty much demonstrate the same argument? Would I need to", "the form of an answer when the content itself is fine? Or if", "making different choices or is there a difference between both cases that I'm", "etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447), where again the exact same components apply.", "STEM, including the creation of jobs where only women are allowed to apply", "less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator", "a comment on that answer, which - rightfully so - pointed out that", "make the answer acceptable and on which grounds? How is not each of", "believe each of the three components of my answer are equally important, due", "represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)),", "up getting deleted? How is that fair to the members of this community?", "gender equality - ironically - have a greater gender gap * This could", "beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They", "countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even", "of the community\". Also, they wanted to make it clear \"moderation of these", "presented in the other answers and in general goes against the majority view", "applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly the same answer, but not for [Do all countries", "question, which content must be removed to make the answer acceptable and on", "to the question? Since I'm not confident I'll receive a response to my", "could answer [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other", "them. Can anyone explain to me why it's OK for [Could it be", "same reason, I deemed it necessary to back up this position by a", "very similar context in the very same community. But let's just assume it", "context in the very same community. But let's just assume it isn't and", "not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose gender,", "was backed up by sources (although less extensively). Then I found the question", "answer contains the following position : * It is a misconception that women", ": * We know that women that faculty members generally prefer female applicants", "the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are women even less represented", "consequence of the current political climate. For the same reason, I deemed it", "both cases. I also asked how I could answer [Why are women even", "moderator in a very similar context in the very same community. But let's", "way I can answer [Why are women even less represented in engineering than", "of course, was backed up by sources (although less extensively). Then I found", "in general, as this applies to only some fields (with especifically computer science", "are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) isn't abuse", "components apply. So here, too, I re-posted my previous answer with minor modifications.", "Can anyone explain to me why it's OK for [Could it be beneficial", "--- ### Question(s) I find it hard to believe that the deletion of", "the personal opinion of one moderator determines whether a detailed answer backed up", "greater objectivity? How is it acceptable that the personal opinion of one moderator", "out that I insufficiently backed up that gender differences are roughly consistent for", "to be equally applicable to both questions, and that leaving out just a", "gender gap * This could be at least partially explained by gender stereotyping", "even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a", "rather the generic information\". I responded to this message by explaining that in", "other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my answer to [Do all countries have", "different graphs & different sources to pretty much demonstrate the same argument? Would", "the answer acceptable and on which grounds? How is not each of the", "a consequence of the current political climate. For the same reason, I deemed", "a different decision was made by a moderator in a very similar context", "answer for both questions in both cases. I also asked how I could", "less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my", "to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448) and [Should I disclose", "from my answer to [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in", "recently updated my answer to the question [Do all countries have the same", "or gender on my applications for tenure track job applications, especially with respect", "that faculty members generally prefer female applicants over male applicants * We also", "if it's really just a matter of including content not relevant enough to", "difference between both cases that I'm just not seeing? And if it is", "not each of the three components of my answer sufficiently relevant to the", "in college admissions * There are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase the number", "worldwide to increase the number of women or \"minorities\" in STEM, including the", "and on which grounds? How is not each of the three components of", "I posted an answer that basically contains the following position : * We", "acceptable and on which grounds? How is not each of the three components", "But let's just assume it isn't and the reason two different answers to", "imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) without my answer getting deleted? Would I need to find", "out. This answer was also deleted, by the same moderator. No comment this", "would not delete my answer in this case because it \"presents a unique", "on which grounds? How is not each of the three components of my", "data, with graphs & sources. In fact, my update consisted mostly of adding", "this community with respect to duplicate content in an attempt to censor an", "know that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in", "moderators making different choices or is there a difference between both cases that", "* It is a misconception that women are underrepresented in science or STEM", "the same reason, I deemed it necessary to back up this position by", "We also know that African-Americans & Hispanics are typically favored over European-Americans &", "gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally they would \"just", "same degree. So I re-posted my answer to this question, with minor modifications.", "of this community with respect to duplicate content in an attempt to censor", "community rules need some revision towards greater objectivity? How is it acceptable that", "sources. In fact, my update consisted mostly of adding additional data, graphs &", "not just allow the answer as it was? Why all the hassle to", "not confident I'll receive a response to my PM, I suppose this is", "less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) without my answer getting deleted?", "it acceptable that the personal opinion of one moderator determines whether a detailed", "fact, my update consisted mostly of adding additional data, graphs & sources as", "is there a difference between both cases that I'm just not seeing? And", "why not just allow the answer as it was? Why all the hassle", "than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter of different moderators making", "a matter of including content not relevant enough to the question, which content", "additional data, graphs & sources as a response to a comment on that", "of these answers is not related to the views expressed in them, but", "explained by gender stereotyping or the high \"geek factor\" of those fields, but", "the question [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) with", "my answer to this question, with minor modifications. Around the same time, I", "those fields, but biological sex differences may play a role at least as", "Then I found the question [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in", "as a new answer, referencing my answer to [Do all countries have the", "goes against the majority view of the community\". Also, they wanted to make", "make it clear \"moderation of these answers is not related to the views", "the same answer, but not for [Do all countries have the same gender", "to believe that the deletion of my answer to [Why are women even", "answer to [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other", "answer to the specifics of each question\". So I decided to remove the", "specifics of each question\". So I decided to remove the least relevant details", "hassle to rephrase the form of an answer when the content itself is", "objectivity? How is it acceptable that the personal opinion of one moderator determines", "not delete my answer in this case because it \"presents a unique view", "even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a", "Would I need to find different data, different graphs & different sources to", "to the members of this community? Also, is there a way I can", "& Asian-Americans in college admissions * There are numerous campaigns worldwide to increase", "the duplicate answer\", but that they would not delete my answer in this", "consisted mostly of adding additional data, graphs & sources as a response to", "explain to me why it's OK for [Could it be beneficial for me", "& different sources to pretty much demonstrate the same argument? Would I need", "And if either of these would be acceptable, why not just allow the", "must be removed to make the answer acceptable and on which grounds? How", "PM from an anonymous moderator about [Could it be beneficial for me to", "also deleted, by the same moderator. No comment this time. Then I received", "white male, I would be inclined to not mention race or gender on", "([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with a comment not to post duplicate answers, and that I should", "especially with respect to positions in a STEM field. For the same reason,", "moderators, doesn't this mean the community rules need some revision towards greater objectivity?", "track job applications, especially with respect to positions in a STEM field. For", "enough to the question, which content must be removed to make the answer", "deemed it necessary to back up this position by a lot of data,", "are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it", "in STEM as a consequence of the current political climate. For the same", "basically contains the following position : * We know that women that faculty", "actual views expressed in them. Can anyone explain to me why it's OK", "cases I believe the exact same answer to be equally applicable to both", "an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448). They told me that normally they would \"just delete the", "disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to have roughly", "need to find different data, different graphs & different sources to pretty much", "updated my answer to the question [Do all countries have the same gender", "much demonstrate the same argument? Would I need to rephrase every paragraph to", "components of the aforementioned answer apply here as well to the same degree.", "least as significant I believe each of the three components of my answer", "race if I were black or Hispanic. This too, of course, was backed", "sources (although less extensively). Then I found the question [Should I disclose gender,", "of my answer as a new answer, referencing my answer to [Do all", "This answer was also deleted, by the same moderator. No comment this time.", "my answer to [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081)", "and in general goes against the majority view of the community\". Also, they", "I learnt that my answer to [Why are women even less represented in", "part of my answer as a new answer, referencing my answer to [Do", "STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my answer to [Do all countries have the", "need some revision towards greater objectivity? How is it acceptable that the personal", "only women are allowed to apply * Therefore, as a white male, I", "different answers to that question are deleted has nothing whatsoever to do with", "different data, different graphs & different sources to pretty much demonstrate the same", "answers to that question are deleted has nothing whatsoever to do with the", "comment on that answer, which - rightfully so - pointed out that I", "for different countries. After updating my answer, I stumbled on the question [Why", "that basically contains the following position : * We know that women that", "the remaining part of my answer as a new answer, referencing my answer", "[Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is", "updating my answer, I stumbled on the question [Why are women even less", "answer to [Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for", "the other answers and in general goes against the majority view of the", "and [Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447)", "PM, I suppose this is question is a suitable alternative approach for getting", "deleted? I received no response so far. --- ### Question(s) I find it", "between both cases that I'm just not seeing? And if it is really", "modifications. Around the same time, I found the question [Could it be beneficial", "of the current political climate. For the same reason, I deemed it necessary", "my gender as a woman or my race if I were black or", "gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) for the details that were left out. This answer", "clear \"moderation of these answers is not related to the views expressed in", "time, I found the question [Could it be beneficial for me to not", "backed up by ample sources ends up getting deleted? How is that fair", "by ample sources ends up getting deleted? How is that fair to the", "the three components of my answer sufficiently relevant to the question? Since I'm", "the exact same answer to be equally applicable to both questions, and that", "answer apply here as well to the same degree. So I re-posted my", "every paragraph to pretty much make the same argument? And if either of", "[Should I disclose gender, race, disabilities etc. in tenure track job applications?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/79933/should-i-disclose-gender-race-disabilities-etc-in-tenure-track-job-applicatio/114447) to", "that gender differences are roughly consistent for different countries. After updating my answer,", "in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) was deleted by a moderator ([Strongbad](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/929/strongbad)), with", "other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)? Is it just a matter of different moderators making different choices", "re-posted my answer to this question, with minor modifications. Around the same time,", "the specifics of each question\". So I decided to remove the least relevant", "response so far. --- ### Question(s) I find it hard to believe that", "this time. Then I received PM from an anonymous moderator about [Could it", "be beneficial for me to not disclose my gender/ethnicity in an REU application?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82753/could-it-be-beneficial-for-me-to-not-disclose-my-gender-ethnicity-in-an-reu-appl/114448)", "to the numerous common misconceptions there are about gender inequality in STEM as", "paragraph to pretty much make the same argument? And if either of these", "to me why it's OK for [Could it be beneficial for me to", "that I'm just not seeing? And if it is really just a matter", "\"presents a unique view that is not presented in the other answers and", "apply. So here, too, I re-posted my previous answer with minor modifications. ---", "Why all the hassle to rephrase the form of an answer when the", "significant I believe each of the three components of my answer are equally", "as a white male, I would be inclined to not mention race or", "common misconceptions there are about gender inequality in STEM as a consequence of", "censor an unpopular opinion, especially considering a different decision was made by a", "favored over European-Americans & Asian-Americans in college admissions * There are numerous campaigns", "very same community. But let's just assume it isn't and the reason two", "modifications. --- ### Problem I learnt that my answer to [Why are women", "by a lot of data, with graphs & sources. In fact, my update", "in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) and realized that all of the three", "are underrepresented in science or STEM fields fields in general, as this applies", "quality of the the answer for both questions in both cases. I also", "question [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)", "same argument? Would I need to rephrase every paragraph to pretty much make", "the members of this community? Also, is there a way I can answer", "on the question [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in", "in them. Can anyone explain to me why it's OK for [Could it", "ends up getting deleted? How is that fair to the members of this", "opinion of one moderator determines whether a detailed answer backed up by ample", "be acceptable, why not just allow the answer as it was? Why all", "I suppose this is question is a suitable alternative approach for getting an", "engineering standing out) * Yes, this is a roughly consistent for different countries,", "to [Why are women even less represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem)", "[Do all countries have the same gender imbalance in science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/34360/do-all-countries-have-the-same-gender-imbalance-in-science/94081) and [Why are", "community? Also, is there a way I can answer [Why are women even", "is really just a matter of different opinions from different moderators, doesn't this", "it hard to believe that the deletion of my answer to [Why are", "represented in engineering than in other STEM?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/97267/why-are-women-even-less-represented-in-engineering-than-in-other-stem) using relevant information from my answer", "rephrase every paragraph to pretty much make the same argument? And if either", "Question(s) I find it hard to believe that the deletion of my answer", "deleted has nothing whatsoever to do with the actual views expressed in them.", "majority view of the community\". Also, they wanted to make it clear \"moderation" ]
[ "preparing grant applications * The IRB approval process and standards * Disclosing industry", "on topic. On one hand, they are related to academic research. On the", "questions about research administration on topic? By \"research administration\" I mean things like:", "and conflicts of interest * How to handle intellectual property and business interests", "things like: * Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like allowed costs for federal", "Help and actual questions/answers here that questions about the academic side of research", "questions may be more appropriate for people with professional experience in research administration,", "uniform guidance regarding things like allowed costs for federal grants * Submitting or", "The IRB approval process and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of", "from research It's less clear to me whether these are on topic. On", "the Help and actual questions/answers here that questions about the academic side of", "they are related to academic research. On the other hand, the Help says", "about research administration on topic? By \"research administration\" I mean things like: ", "are related to academic research. On the other hand, the Help says this", "costs for federal grants Submitting or preparing grant applications * The IRB", "* Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like allowed costs for federal grants ", "regarding things like allowed costs for federal grants Submitting or preparing grant", "interests that stem from research It's less clear to me whether these are", "be more appropriate for people with professional experience in research administration, rather than", "partnerships and conflicts of interest * How to handle intellectual property and business", "that stem from research It's less clear to me whether these are on", "\"research administration\" I mean things like: * Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like", "On the other hand, the Help says this site is appropriate for academics", "to academic research. On the other hand, the Help says this site is", "intellectual property and business interests that stem from research It's less clear to", "hand, the Help says this site is appropriate for academics and these questions", "from the Help and actual questions/answers here that questions about the academic side", "more appropriate for people with professional experience in research administration, rather than academics", "appropriate for academics and these questions may be more appropriate for people with", "business interests that stem from research It's less clear to me whether these", "here that questions about the academic side of research are on topic. However,", "research are on topic. However, are questions about research administration on topic? By", "administration on topic? By \"research administration\" I mean things like: * Interpreting uniform", "me whether these are on topic. On one hand, they are related to", "handle intellectual property and business interests that stem from research It's less clear", "topic. However, are questions about research administration on topic? By \"research administration\" I", "the other hand, the Help says this site is appropriate for academics and", "appropriate for people with professional experience in research administration, rather than academics themselves.", "it's clear from the Help and actual questions/answers here that questions about the", "research administration on topic? By \"research administration\" I mean things like: * Interpreting", "and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of interest * How to", "research. On the other hand, the Help says this site is appropriate for", "for federal grants * Submitting or preparing grant applications * The IRB approval", "It's less clear to me whether these are on topic. On one hand,", "Help says this site is appropriate for academics and these questions may be", "* Submitting or preparing grant applications * The IRB approval process and standards", "grants * Submitting or preparing grant applications * The IRB approval process and", "and actual questions/answers here that questions about the academic side of research are", "are on topic. However, are questions about research administration on topic? By \"research", "IRB approval process and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of interest", "I think it's clear from the Help and actual questions/answers here that questions", "on topic? By \"research administration\" I mean things like: * Interpreting uniform guidance", "hand, they are related to academic research. On the other hand, the Help", "to handle intellectual property and business interests that stem from research It's less", "says this site is appropriate for academics and these questions may be more", "* The IRB approval process and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts", "academics and these questions may be more appropriate for people with professional experience", "applications * The IRB approval process and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and", "academic side of research are on topic. However, are questions about research administration", "topic? By \"research administration\" I mean things like: * Interpreting uniform guidance regarding", "mean things like: * Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like allowed costs for", "industry partnerships and conflicts of interest * How to handle intellectual property and", "By \"research administration\" I mean things like: * Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things", "may be more appropriate for people with professional experience in research administration, rather", "to me whether these are on topic. On one hand, they are related", "this site is appropriate for academics and these questions may be more appropriate", "guidance regarding things like allowed costs for federal grants * Submitting or preparing", "stem from research It's less clear to me whether these are on topic.", "of interest * How to handle intellectual property and business interests that stem", "side of research are on topic. However, are questions about research administration on", "property and business interests that stem from research It's less clear to me", "topic. On one hand, they are related to academic research. On the other", "clear from the Help and actual questions/answers here that questions about the academic", "I mean things like: * Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like allowed costs", "Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like allowed costs for federal grants * Submitting", "are questions about research administration on topic? By \"research administration\" I mean things", "or preparing grant applications * The IRB approval process and standards * Disclosing", "related to academic research. On the other hand, the Help says this site", "for academics and these questions may be more appropriate for people with professional", "However, are questions about research administration on topic? By \"research administration\" I mean", "process and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of interest * How", "questions about the academic side of research are on topic. However, are questions", "think it's clear from the Help and actual questions/answers here that questions about", "approval process and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of interest ", "about the academic side of research are on topic. However, are questions about", "actual questions/answers here that questions about the academic side of research are on", "the academic side of research are on topic. However, are questions about research", "research It's less clear to me whether these are on topic. On one", "On one hand, they are related to academic research. On the other hand,", "academic research. On the other hand, the Help says this site is appropriate", "the Help says this site is appropriate for academics and these questions may", "allowed costs for federal grants Submitting or preparing grant applications * The", "like: * Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like allowed costs for federal grants", "Submitting or preparing grant applications * The IRB approval process and standards ", "grant applications The IRB approval process and standards * Disclosing industry partnerships", "like allowed costs for federal grants * Submitting or preparing grant applications ", "Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of interest How to handle intellectual property", "less clear to me whether these are on topic. On one hand, they", "other hand, the Help says this site is appropriate for academics and these", "that questions about the academic side of research are on topic. However, are", "things like allowed costs for federal grants * Submitting or preparing grant applications", "these questions may be more appropriate for people with professional experience in research", "standards * Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of interest * How to handle", "conflicts of interest * How to handle intellectual property and business interests that", "whether these are on topic. On one hand, they are related to academic", "site is appropriate for academics and these questions may be more appropriate for", "are on topic. On one hand, they are related to academic research. On", "federal grants * Submitting or preparing grant applications * The IRB approval process", "and business interests that stem from research It's less clear to me whether", "one hand, they are related to academic research. On the other hand, the", "and these questions may be more appropriate for people with professional experience in", "questions/answers here that questions about the academic side of research are on topic.", "administration\" I mean things like: * Interpreting uniform guidance regarding things like allowed", "clear to me whether these are on topic. On one hand, they are", "these are on topic. On one hand, they are related to academic research.", "is appropriate for academics and these questions may be more appropriate for people", "How to handle intellectual property and business interests that stem from research It's", "of research are on topic. However, are questions about research administration on topic?", "* Disclosing industry partnerships and conflicts of interest * How to handle intellectual", "on topic. However, are questions about research administration on topic? By \"research administration\"", "interest * How to handle intellectual property and business interests that stem from", "* How to handle intellectual property and business interests that stem from research" ]
[ "months ago and I would like to get it deleted. In the question", "all my text back and locked the question. I was wondering how can", "my opinion and view that I have written and left the question with", "post and removed my opinion and view that I have written and left", "that I have written and left the question with only a few words", "told that there have been some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and", "would like to get it deleted. In the question I have posted my", "few months ago and I would like to get it deleted. In the", "it deleted. In the question I have posted my own opinion and views", "to get it deleted. In the question I have posted my own opinion", "already answered to it. I have edited the post and removed my opinion", "an essay. I have been told that there have been some similarities found", "removed my opinion and view that I have written and left the question", "own opinion and views that I have used in an essay. I have", "since a person already answered to it. I have edited the post and", "I have tried to delete the question but I am unable to do", "that there have been some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I", "am unable to do so since a person already answered to it. I", "similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried to delete the", "text back and locked the question. I was wondering how can I delete", "the question with only a few words left. A moderator has edited my", "ago and I would like to get it deleted. In the question I", "and locked the question. I was wondering how can I delete such question.", "and removed my opinion and view that I have written and left the", "edited the post and removed my opinion and view that I have written", "A moderator has edited my question and added all my text back and", "a few words left. A moderator has edited my question and added all", "have been told that there have been some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/)", "delete the question but I am unable to do so since a person", "and views that I have used in an essay. I have been told", "found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried to delete the question", "have used in an essay. I have been told that there have been", "there have been some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have", "few words left. A moderator has edited my question and added all my", "my question and added all my text back and locked the question. I", "the question I have posted my own opinion and views that I have", "a few months ago and I would like to get it deleted. In", "to delete the question but I am unable to do so since a", "and left the question with only a few words left. A moderator has", "some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried to delete", "to do so since a person already answered to it. I have edited", "tried to delete the question but I am unable to do so since", "been some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried to", "added all my text back and locked the question. I was wondering how", "written and left the question with only a few words left. A moderator", "opinion and view that I have written and left the question with only", "question with only a few words left. A moderator has edited my question", "I have posted my own opinion and views that I have used in", "unable to do so since a person already answered to it. I have", "have written and left the question with only a few words left. A", "been told that there have been some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service", "has edited my question and added all my text back and locked the", "have edited the post and removed my opinion and view that I have", "and view that I have written and left the question with only a", "posted my own opinion and views that I have used in an essay.", "that I have used in an essay. I have been told that there", "with only a few words left. A moderator has edited my question and", "words left. A moderator has edited my question and added all my text", "question and added all my text back and locked the question. I was", "but I am unable to do so since a person already answered to", "I am unable to do so since a person already answered to it.", "question but I am unable to do so since a person already answered", "I have edited the post and removed my opinion and view that I", "so since a person already answered to it. I have edited the post", "I have used in an essay. I have been told that there have", "I have been told that there have been some similarities found using the", "have tried to delete the question but I am unable to do so", "I have written and left the question with only a few words left.", "views that I have used in an essay. I have been told that", "and I have tried to delete the question but I am unable to", "question I have posted my own opinion and views that I have used", "answered to it. I have edited the post and removed my opinion and", "my own opinion and views that I have used in an essay. I", "posted a question a few months ago and I would like to get", "to it. I have edited the post and removed my opinion and view", "the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried to delete the question but I", "edited my question and added all my text back and locked the question.", "left the question with only a few words left. A moderator has edited", "the post and removed my opinion and view that I have written and", "only a few words left. A moderator has edited my question and added", "In the question I have posted my own opinion and views that I", "essay. I have been told that there have been some similarities found using", "have posted a question a few months ago and I would like to", "service and I have tried to delete the question but I am unable", "do so since a person already answered to it. I have edited the", "like to get it deleted. In the question I have posted my own", "used in an essay. I have been told that there have been some", "I have posted a question a few months ago and I would like", "in an essay. I have been told that there have been some similarities", "a question a few months ago and I would like to get it", "I would like to get it deleted. In the question I have posted", "person already answered to it. I have edited the post and removed my", "it. I have edited the post and removed my opinion and view that", "view that I have written and left the question with only a few", "left. A moderator has edited my question and added all my text back", "have posted my own opinion and views that I have used in an", "a person already answered to it. I have edited the post and removed", "deleted. In the question I have posted my own opinion and views that", "get it deleted. In the question I have posted my own opinion and", "opinion and views that I have used in an essay. I have been", "my text back and locked the question. I was wondering how can I", "and added all my text back and locked the question. I was wondering", "[Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried to delete the question but I am", "using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried to delete the question but", "the question but I am unable to do so since a person already", "question a few months ago and I would like to get it deleted.", "have been some similarities found using the [Turnitin](https://www.turnitin.com/) service and I have tried", "and I would like to get it deleted. In the question I have", "moderator has edited my question and added all my text back and locked", "back and locked the question. I was wondering how can I delete such" ]
[ "I think that the closure of the above questions is unfair and unwarranted,", "types of questions. A few examples: [After my PhD how much salary should", "a postdoctoral fellow in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income", "the normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058)", "of the above questions is unfair and unwarranted, given that this community has", "North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of a W1/W2 german", "unwarranted, given that this community has well received many other, even much broader,", "do computer science professors make in the United States?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/76178/20058) [Academic salaries at European", "income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do computer science", "even much broader, questions about salary in various parts of the world, and", "a uniform way certain types of questions. A few examples: [After my PhD", "in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of a W1/W2", "uniform way certain types of questions. A few examples: [After my PhD how", "factors. I think that the closure of the above questions is unfair and", "other one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115513/20058) have been recently put on hold for being strongly dependent on", "science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow in North", "[This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115512/20058) and [this other one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115513/20058) have been recently put on hold for", "strongly dependent on individual factors. I think that the closure of the above", "been recently put on hold for being strongly dependent on individual factors. I", "german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do computer science professors make in the", "in a uniform way certain types of questions. A few examples: [After my", "postdoctoral fellow in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115512/20058) and [this other one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115513/20058) have been recently put on hold for being", "Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary", "PhD how much salary should I expect as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058)", "I expect as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal", "dependent on individual factors. I think that the closure of the above questions", "I would like to encourage everyone to treat in a uniform way certain", "[How much is the normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow in North America", "the closure of the above questions is unfair and unwarranted, given that this", "various parts of the world, and I would like to encourage everyone to", "A few examples: [After my PhD how much salary should I expect as", "fellow in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of a", "unfair and unwarranted, given that this community has well received many other, even", "being strongly dependent on individual factors. I think that the closure of the", "like to encourage everyone to treat in a uniform way certain types of", "hold for being strongly dependent on individual factors. I think that the closure", "the net income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do", "of questions. A few examples: [After my PhD how much salary should I", "much salary should I expect as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much", "individual factors. I think that the closure of the above questions is unfair", "questions. A few examples: [After my PhD how much salary should I expect", "encourage everyone to treat in a uniform way certain types of questions. A", "few examples: [After my PhD how much salary should I expect as a", "should I expect as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the", "this community has well received many other, even much broader, questions about salary", "[How much non-salary income do computer science professors make in the United States?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/76178/20058)", "expect as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal salary", "income do computer science professors make in the United States?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/76178/20058) [Academic salaries at", "about salary in various parts of the world, and I would like to", "given that this community has well received many other, even much broader, questions", "one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115513/20058) have been recently put on hold for being strongly dependent on individual", "the above questions is unfair and unwarranted, given that this community has well", "for being strongly dependent on individual factors. I think that the closure of", "W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do computer science professors make in", "many other, even much broader, questions about salary in various parts of the", "how much salary should I expect as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How", "net income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do computer", "salary should I expect as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is", "in various parts of the world, and I would like to encourage everyone", "a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal salary of a", "community has well received many other, even much broader, questions about salary in", "of the world, and I would like to encourage everyone to treat in", "put on hold for being strongly dependent on individual factors. I think that", "above questions is unfair and unwarranted, given that this community has well received", "professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do computer science professors make in the United", "to treat in a uniform way certain types of questions. A few examples:", "that the closure of the above questions is unfair and unwarranted, given that", "non-salary income do computer science professors make in the United States?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/76178/20058) [Academic salaries", "America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058)", "professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal salary of a postdoctoral", "questions is unfair and unwarranted, given that this community has well received many", "certain types of questions. A few examples: [After my PhD how much salary", "of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do computer science professors", "[What's the net income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income", "is the normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow in North America and Western", "parts of the world, and I would like to encourage everyone to treat", "much broader, questions about salary in various parts of the world, and I", "the world, and I would like to encourage everyone to treat in a", "Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much", "a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How much non-salary income do computer science professors make", "as a professor of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal salary of", "questions about salary in various parts of the world, and I would like", "and unwarranted, given that this community has well received many other, even much", "examples: [After my PhD how much salary should I expect as a professor", "salary of a postdoctoral fellow in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the", "think that the closure of the above questions is unfair and unwarranted, given", "normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's", "much non-salary income do computer science professors make in the United States?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/76178/20058) [Academic", "and [this other one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115513/20058) have been recently put on hold for being strongly", "closure of the above questions is unfair and unwarranted, given that this community", "has well received many other, even much broader, questions about salary in various", "received many other, even much broader, questions about salary in various parts of", "and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net income of a W1/W2 german professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/221/20058) [How", "have been recently put on hold for being strongly dependent on individual factors.", "[this other one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115513/20058) have been recently put on hold for being strongly dependent", "well received many other, even much broader, questions about salary in various parts", "everyone to treat in a uniform way certain types of questions. A few", "[After my PhD how much salary should I expect as a professor of", "that this community has well received many other, even much broader, questions about", "on individual factors. I think that the closure of the above questions is", "salary in various parts of the world, and I would like to encourage", "of computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow", "treat in a uniform way certain types of questions. A few examples: [After", "other, even much broader, questions about salary in various parts of the world,", "world, and I would like to encourage everyone to treat in a uniform", "computer science professors make in the United States?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/76178/20058) [Academic salaries at European universities](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/28/20058)", "way certain types of questions. A few examples: [After my PhD how much", "computer science?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/2346/20058) [How much is the normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow in", "of a postdoctoral fellow in North America and Western Europe?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/12618/20058) [What's the net", "would like to encourage everyone to treat in a uniform way certain types", "my PhD how much salary should I expect as a professor of computer", "much is the normal salary of a postdoctoral fellow in North America and", "to encourage everyone to treat in a uniform way certain types of questions.", "on hold for being strongly dependent on individual factors. I think that the", "recently put on hold for being strongly dependent on individual factors. I think", "is unfair and unwarranted, given that this community has well received many other,", "broader, questions about salary in various parts of the world, and I would", "and I would like to encourage everyone to treat in a uniform way" ]
[ "got deleted. Maybe people never know for sure whether a question is worthy", "have from which they can figure out how to ask a good question.", "Maybe researchers have knowledge that I don't have from which they can figure", "on this website and I think all of them got deleted. I have", "sure that it would waste so much time more heavily researching whether that", "few questions on this website and I think all of them got deleted.", "so much time more heavily researching whether that question is worthy of deleting.", "knowledge that I don't have from which they can figure out how to", "could explain what's wrong with the question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible", "question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them", "Maybe people never know for sure whether a question is worthy of deleting,", "type of answer will help me. Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong with", "from which they can figure out how to ask a good question. I", "figure out how to ask a good question. I read [How do I", "to 10k+ users) I asked that got deleted. Maybe people never know for", "how to explain what type of answer will help me. Maybe somebody could", "it's worthy of deleting and pretty sure that it would waste so much", "and neither of them helped. Basically, I would like a detailed answer teaching", "and [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped.", "do it because they're pretty sure that it's worthy of deleting and pretty", "read [How do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I", "[What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped. Basically,", "answer will help me. Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong with the question", "explain what type of answer will help me. Maybe somebody could explain what's", "me. Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong with the question [Is math useful", "to explain what type of answer will help me. Maybe somebody could explain", "do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I ask about", "I would like a detailed answer teaching me how to ask a good", "deleting and pretty sure that it would waste so much time more heavily", "that it would waste so much time more heavily researching whether that question", "for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I asked that got deleted. Maybe people", "(accessible to 10k+ users) I asked that got deleted. Maybe people never know", "they do it because they're pretty sure that it's worthy of deleting and", "asked that got deleted. Maybe people never know for sure whether a question", "have knowledge that I don't have from which they can figure out how", "researchers have knowledge that I don't have from which they can figure out", "when somebody deletes a question, they do it because they're pretty sure that", "would waste so much time more heavily researching whether that question is worthy", "Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong with the question [Is math useful for", "people never know for sure whether a question is worthy of deleting, and", "I don't have from which they can figure out how to ask a", "never know for sure whether a question is worthy of deleting, and when", "whether a question is worthy of deleting, and when somebody deletes a question,", "this website and I think all of them got deleted. I have no", "and when somebody deletes a question, they do it because they're pretty sure", "like a detailed answer teaching me how to ask a good question. I", "researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that I don't have from which they can", "about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped. Basically, I would like a detailed", "a question, they do it because they're pretty sure that it's worthy of", "I think all of them got deleted. I have no idea how to", "explain what's wrong with the question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to", "detailed answer teaching me how to ask a good question. I don't really", "non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I asked that got deleted. Maybe people never", "on this site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that I", "answer teaching me how to ask a good question. I don't really know", "somebody could explain what's wrong with the question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research)", "good question on this site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge", "users) I asked that got deleted. Maybe people never know for sure whether", "good question. I read [How do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What", "of them helped. Basically, I would like a detailed answer teaching me how", "know for sure whether a question is worthy of deleting, and when somebody", "no idea how to ask a good question on this site. I'm not", "of them got deleted. I have no idea how to ask a good", "got deleted. I have no idea how to ask a good question on", "idea how to ask a good question on this site. I'm not a", "that it's worthy of deleting and pretty sure that it would waste so", "math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I asked that got deleted.", "here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped. Basically, I would like a detailed answer", "this site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that I don't", "which they can figure out how to ask a good question. I read", "ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped. Basically, I would like a", "ask a good question on this site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers", "all of them got deleted. I have no idea how to ask a", "I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)", "I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that I don't have from", "question. I read [How do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics", "the question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I asked", "how to ask a good question on this site. I'm not a researcher.", "I asked that got deleted. Maybe people never know for sure whether a", "a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that I don't have from which they", "would like a detailed answer teaching me how to ask a good question.", "I have no idea how to ask a good question on this site.", "pretty sure that it's worthy of deleting and pretty sure that it would", "question, they do it because they're pretty sure that it's worthy of deleting", "and I think all of them got deleted. I have no idea how", "good question. I don't really know how to explain what type of answer", "question. I don't really know how to explain what type of answer will", "questions on this website and I think all of them got deleted. I", "website and I think all of them got deleted. I have no idea", "10k+ users) I asked that got deleted. Maybe people never know for sure", "Basically, I would like a detailed answer teaching me how to ask a", "help me. Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong with the question [Is math", "sure whether a question is worthy of deleting, and when somebody deletes a", "because they're pretty sure that it's worthy of deleting and pretty sure that", "a good question. I read [How do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and", "of deleting, and when somebody deletes a question, they do it because they're", "don't have from which they can figure out how to ask a good", "deleting, and when somebody deletes a question, they do it because they're pretty", "asked a few questions on this website and I think all of them", "wrong with the question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users)", "how to ask a good question. I read [How do I ask a", "can figure out how to ask a good question. I read [How do", "can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped. Basically, I would", "I don't really know how to explain what type of answer will help", "[Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I asked that got", "topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped. Basically, I", "not a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that I don't have from which", "to ask a good question on this site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe", "a good question on this site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers have", "of answer will help me. Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong with the", "is worthy of deleting, and when somebody deletes a question, they do it", "know how to explain what type of answer will help me. Maybe somebody", "have no idea how to ask a good question on this site. I'm", "they can figure out how to ask a good question. I read [How", "question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I asked that", "deletes a question, they do it because they're pretty sure that it's worthy", "it because they're pretty sure that it's worthy of deleting and pretty sure", "deleted. I have no idea how to ask a good question on this", "neither of them helped. Basically, I would like a detailed answer teaching me", "I asked a few questions on this website and I think all of", "it would waste so much time more heavily researching whether that question is", "don't really know how to explain what type of answer will help me.", "deleted. Maybe people never know for sure whether a question is worthy of", "a detailed answer teaching me how to ask a good question. I don't", "a question is worthy of deleting, and when somebody deletes a question, they", "how to ask a good question. I don't really know how to explain", "they're pretty sure that it's worthy of deleting and pretty sure that it", "good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of", "I read [How do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can", "a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither", "ask a good question. I read [How do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask)", "worthy of deleting and pretty sure that it would waste so much time", "of deleting and pretty sure that it would waste so much time more", "waste so much time more heavily researching whether that question is worthy of", "me how to ask a good question. I don't really know how to", "question is worthy of deleting, and when somebody deletes a question, they do", "useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I asked that got deleted. Maybe", "for sure whether a question is worthy of deleting, and when somebody deletes", "a few questions on this website and I think all of them got", "them got deleted. I have no idea how to ask a good question", "to ask a good question. I read [How do I ask a good", "out how to ask a good question. I read [How do I ask", "[How do I ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I ask", "teaching me how to ask a good question. I don't really know how", "to ask a good question. I don't really know how to explain what", "and pretty sure that it would waste so much time more heavily researching", "a good question. I don't really know how to explain what type of", "site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that I don't have", "question on this site. I'm not a researcher. Maybe researchers have knowledge that", "helped. Basically, I would like a detailed answer teaching me how to ask", "will help me. Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong with the question [Is", "somebody deletes a question, they do it because they're pretty sure that it's", "think all of them got deleted. I have no idea how to ask", "that I don't have from which they can figure out how to ask", "ask a good question?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask) and [What topics can I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and", "with the question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+ users) I", "worthy of deleting, and when somebody deletes a question, they do it because", "what type of answer will help me. Maybe somebody could explain what's wrong", "what's wrong with the question [Is math useful for non-math-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/111692/is-math-useful-for-non-math-research) (accessible to 10k+", "them helped. Basically, I would like a detailed answer teaching me how to", "that got deleted. Maybe people never know for sure whether a question is", "pretty sure that it would waste so much time more heavily researching whether", "ask a good question. I don't really know how to explain what type", "really know how to explain what type of answer will help me. Maybe", "I ask about here?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) and neither of them helped. Basically, I would like", "sure that it's worthy of deleting and pretty sure that it would waste" ]
[ "questions first: • I am working in an established research group? • Does", "processes in which we search for how relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances.", "account and it will be effectuated within 24 hours. I received an indirect", "experiences and circumstances. Do not judge too quickly. This is a necessity for", "believe in righteousness. Science needs people like you. I will remember your response:", "lifting those in your circle of influence. Yes, science works for you but", "will shepherd those in my care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage and", "also hope, some day you will understand that we all go to processes", "or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work is received? I really hope, one", "I really hope, one day you will experience the joy of being generous,", "your circle of influence. Yes, science works for you but that does not", "for minorities like me, and practising science comes at high personal costs. For", "hope, some day you will understand that we all go to processes in", "supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work is received? I really hope, one day", "mostly targeted at questions that criticise (or question) current practices in science. Current", "Finally, I want to thank all the other community members who lifted me", "science works for you but that does not devaluate the experience of others.", "research groups. Current practises do not work for minorities like me, and practising", "too quickly. This is a necessity for human growth. I especially want to", "Current practices work for those affiliated to established research groups. Current practises do", "search for how relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do not judge too", "devaluate the experience of others. I also hope, some day you will understand", "ongoing search for truth and improvement. @Buffy for your quest for humanity. You", "minorities like me, and practising science comes at high personal costs. For those", "wisdom. I am not there yet but I promise I will shepherd those", "lifted me up or provided useful feedback. May your lives and careers prosper.", "that criticise (or question) current practices in science. Current practices work for those", "at high personal costs. For those personally criticising or downvoting participants who have", "of lifting those in your circle of influence. Yes, science works for you", "brutal honesty, courage and believe in righteousness. Science needs people like you. I", "participants. @Allure for your honesty and ongoing search for truth and improvement. @Buffy", "my work is received? I really hope, one day you will experience the", "research group? • Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work", "practises do not work for minorities like me, and practising science comes at", "for your sincere response to one of my questions, which many would see", "(new) participants are downvoted or labelled as a duplicate because a couple of", "(…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere response to one of my questions, which", "to thank all the other community members who lifted me up or provided", "for your honesty and ongoing search for truth and improvement. @Buffy for your", "or downvoting participants who have the courage to raise their voice, I would", "my posts. I also do not like how quickly sincere questions of (new)", "reach a certain level of experience to practise such wisdom. I am not", "• I am working in an established research group? • Does my group’s", "human growth. I especially want to thank some participants. @Allure for your honesty", "am not there yet but I promise I will shepherd those in my", "your honesty and ongoing search for truth and improvement. @Buffy for your quest", "an indirect personal attack on my posts. I also do not like how", "a similar question was asked. These responses are mostly targeted at questions that", "a necessity for human growth. I especially want to thank some participants. @Allure", "experience to practise such wisdom. I am not there yet but I promise", "experience the joy of being generous, the joy of lifting those in your", "needs people like you. I will remember your response: “do not fear (…).”", "the joy of being generous, the joy of lifting those in your circle", "not like how quickly sincere questions of (new) participants are downvoted or labelled", "personally criticising or downvoting participants who have the courage to raise their voice,", "sincere response to one of my questions, which many would see as a", "I will remember your response: “do not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your", "my questions, which many would see as a rant. Finally, I want to", "search for truth and improvement. @Buffy for your quest for humanity. You have", "of experience to practise such wisdom. I am not there yet but I", "you to ask yourself the following questions first: • I am working in", "criticising or downvoting participants who have the courage to raise their voice, I", "want to thank some participants. @Allure for your honesty and ongoing search for", "for humanity. You have to reach a certain level of experience to practise", "in science. Current practices work for those affiliated to established research groups. Current", "the joy of lifting those in your circle of influence. Yes, science works", "asked. These responses are mostly targeted at questions that criticise (or question) current", "your sincere response to one of my questions, which many would see as", "and believe in righteousness. Science needs people like you. I will remember your", "downvoting participants who have the courage to raise their voice, I would like", "received an indirect personal attack on my posts. I also do not like", "do not work for minorities like me, and practising science comes at high", "Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work is received? I", "will remember your response: “do not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere", "received? I really hope, one day you will experience the joy of being", "those in your circle of influence. Yes, science works for you but that", "years ago a similar question was asked. These responses are mostly targeted at", "would see as a rant. Finally, I want to thank all the other", "science. Current practices work for those affiliated to established research groups. Current practises", "like you to ask yourself the following questions first: • I am working", "day you will understand that we all go to processes in which we", "relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do not judge too quickly. This is", "people like you. I will remember your response: “do not fear (…).” .", "questions that criticise (or question) current practices in science. Current practices work for", "not devaluate the experience of others. I also hope, some day you will", "work is received? I really hope, one day you will experience the joy", "righteousness. Science needs people like you. I will remember your response: “do not", "following questions first: • I am working in an established research group? •", "but that does not devaluate the experience of others. I also hope, some", "you will experience the joy of being generous, the joy of lifting those", "was asked. These responses are mostly targeted at questions that criticise (or question)", "and practising science comes at high personal costs. For those personally criticising or", "influence. Yes, science works for you but that does not devaluate the experience", "of being generous, the joy of lifting those in your circle of influence.", "of others. I also hope, some day you will understand that we all", "“do not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere response to one of", "the other community members who lifted me up or provided useful feedback. May", "I will shepherd those in my care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage", "indirect personal attack on my posts. I also do not like how quickly", "your quest for humanity. You have to reach a certain level of experience", "you. I will remember your response: “do not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for", "go to processes in which we search for how relate ourselves to experiences", "costs. For those personally criticising or downvoting participants who have the courage to", "level of experience to practise such wisdom. I am not there yet but", "your brutal honesty, courage and believe in righteousness. Science needs people like you.", "how relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do not judge too quickly. This", "practices work for those affiliated to established research groups. Current practises do not", ". @user3209815 for your sincere response to one of my questions, which many", "of years ago a similar question was asked. These responses are mostly targeted", "a couple of years ago a similar question was asked. These responses are", "similar question was asked. These responses are mostly targeted at questions that criticise", "for how relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do not judge too quickly.", "not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere response to one of my", "established research group? • Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my", "current practices in science. Current practices work for those affiliated to established research", "have to reach a certain level of experience to practise such wisdom. I", "we all go to processes in which we search for how relate ourselves", "established research groups. Current practises do not work for minorities like me, and", "are mostly targeted at questions that criticise (or question) current practices in science.", "in my care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage and believe in righteousness.", "group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work is received? I really hope,", "fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere response to one of my questions,", "circumstances. Do not judge too quickly. This is a necessity for human growth.", "within 24 hours. I received an indirect personal attack on my posts. I", "have the courage to raise their voice, I would like you to ask", "@Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage and believe in righteousness. Science needs people", "thank all the other community members who lifted me up or provided useful", "in righteousness. Science needs people like you. I will remember your response: “do", "I especially want to thank some participants. @Allure for your honesty and ongoing", "• Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work is received?", "question) current practices in science. Current practices work for those affiliated to established", "who have the courage to raise their voice, I would like you to", "raise their voice, I would like you to ask yourself the following questions", "24 hours. I received an indirect personal attack on my posts. I also", "effectuated within 24 hours. I received an indirect personal attack on my posts.", "response: “do not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere response to one", "targeted at questions that criticise (or question) current practices in science. Current practices", "honesty and ongoing search for truth and improvement. @Buffy for your quest for", "for your brutal honesty, courage and believe in righteousness. Science needs people like", "circle of influence. Yes, science works for you but that does not devaluate", "responses are mostly targeted at questions that criticise (or question) current practices in", "a duplicate because a couple of years ago a similar question was asked.", "would like you to ask yourself the following questions first: • I am", "questions of (new) participants are downvoted or labelled as a duplicate because a", "(or question) current practices in science. Current practices work for those affiliated to", "improvement. @Buffy for your quest for humanity. You have to reach a certain", "personal attack on my posts. I also do not like how quickly sincere", "Current practises do not work for minorities like me, and practising science comes", "to practise such wisdom. I am not there yet but I promise I", "all go to processes in which we search for how relate ourselves to", "many would see as a rant. Finally, I want to thank all the", "of influence. Yes, science works for you but that does not devaluate the", "working in an established research group? • Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation", "to reach a certain level of experience to practise such wisdom. I am", "shepherd those in my care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage and believe", "you will understand that we all go to processes in which we search", "is received? I really hope, one day you will experience the joy of", "growth. I especially want to thank some participants. @Allure for your honesty and", "which we search for how relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do not", "truth and improvement. @Buffy for your quest for humanity. You have to reach", "also do not like how quickly sincere questions of (new) participants are downvoted", "not there yet but I promise I will shepherd those in my care.", "to experiences and circumstances. Do not judge too quickly. This is a necessity", "one day you will experience the joy of being generous, the joy of", "quest for humanity. You have to reach a certain level of experience to", "quickly sincere questions of (new) participants are downvoted or labelled as a duplicate", "in which we search for how relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do", "honesty, courage and believe in righteousness. Science needs people like you. I will", "and circumstances. Do not judge too quickly. This is a necessity for human", "first: • I am working in an established research group? • Does my", "personal costs. For those personally criticising or downvoting participants who have the courage", "all the other community members who lifted me up or provided useful feedback.", "remember your response: “do not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere response", "Do not judge too quickly. This is a necessity for human growth. I", "in an established research group? • Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits", "necessity for human growth. I especially want to thank some participants. @Allure for", "who lifted me up or provided useful feedback. May your lives and careers", "sincere questions of (new) participants are downvoted or labelled as a duplicate because", "ago a similar question was asked. These responses are mostly targeted at questions", "or labelled as a duplicate because a couple of years ago a similar", "those affiliated to established research groups. Current practises do not work for minorities", "hope, one day you will experience the joy of being generous, the joy", "@Buffy for your quest for humanity. You have to reach a certain level", "that we all go to processes in which we search for how relate", "some participants. @Allure for your honesty and ongoing search for truth and improvement.", "your response: “do not fear (…).” . @user3209815 for your sincere response to", "voice, I would like you to ask yourself the following questions first: •", "This is a necessity for human growth. I especially want to thank some", "at questions that criticise (or question) current practices in science. Current practices work", "is a necessity for human growth. I especially want to thank some participants.", "certain level of experience to practise such wisdom. I am not there yet", "and ongoing search for truth and improvement. @Buffy for your quest for humanity.", "participants who have the courage to raise their voice, I would like you", "will be effectuated within 24 hours. I received an indirect personal attack on", "that does not devaluate the experience of others. I also hope, some day", "ask yourself the following questions first: • I am working in an established", "a certain level of experience to practise such wisdom. I am not there", "like how quickly sincere questions of (new) participants are downvoted or labelled as", "like you. I will remember your response: “do not fear (…).” . @user3209815", "joy of lifting those in your circle of influence. Yes, science works for", "Science needs people like you. I will remember your response: “do not fear", "practices in science. Current practices work for those affiliated to established research groups.", "an established research group? • Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how", "science comes at high personal costs. For those personally criticising or downvoting participants", "those in my care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage and believe in", "I am not there yet but I promise I will shepherd those in", "to established research groups. Current practises do not work for minorities like me,", "which many would see as a rant. Finally, I want to thank all", "as a duplicate because a couple of years ago a similar question was", "quickly. This is a necessity for human growth. I especially want to thank", "thank some participants. @Allure for your honesty and ongoing search for truth and", "me, and practising science comes at high personal costs. For those personally criticising", "rant. Finally, I want to thank all the other community members who lifted", "@user3209815 for your sincere response to one of my questions, which many would", "will experience the joy of being generous, the joy of lifting those in", "ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do not judge too quickly. This is a", "groups. Current practises do not work for minorities like me, and practising science", "are downvoted or labelled as a duplicate because a couple of years ago", "courage to raise their voice, I would like you to ask yourself the", "care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage and believe in righteousness. Science needs", "and it will be effectuated within 24 hours. I received an indirect personal", "criticise (or question) current practices in science. Current practices work for those affiliated", "questions, which many would see as a rant. Finally, I want to thank", "to one of my questions, which many would see as a rant. Finally,", "members who lifted me up or provided useful feedback. May your lives and", "to thank some participants. @Allure for your honesty and ongoing search for truth", "for your quest for humanity. You have to reach a certain level of", "duplicate because a couple of years ago a similar question was asked. These", "practising science comes at high personal costs. For those personally criticising or downvoting", "practise such wisdom. I am not there yet but I promise I will", "I am working in an established research group? • Does my group’s or", "for those affiliated to established research groups. Current practises do not work for", "want to thank all the other community members who lifted me up or", "response to one of my questions, which many would see as a rant.", "couple of years ago a similar question was asked. These responses are mostly", "experience of others. I also hope, some day you will understand that we", "the experience of others. I also hope, some day you will understand that", "it will be effectuated within 24 hours. I received an indirect personal attack", "I would like you to ask yourself the following questions first: • I", "generous, the joy of lifting those in your circle of influence. Yes, science", "we search for how relate ourselves to experiences and circumstances. Do not judge", "my account and it will be effectuated within 24 hours. I received an", "their voice, I would like you to ask yourself the following questions first:", "attack on my posts. I also do not like how quickly sincere questions", "I closed my account and it will be effectuated within 24 hours. I", "group? • Does my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work is", "on my posts. I also do not like how quickly sincere questions of", "closed my account and it will be effectuated within 24 hours. I received", "my group’s or supervisor’s reputation benefits how my work is received? I really", "do not like how quickly sincere questions of (new) participants are downvoted or", "as a rant. Finally, I want to thank all the other community members", "not judge too quickly. This is a necessity for human growth. I especially", "especially want to thank some participants. @Allure for your honesty and ongoing search", "one of my questions, which many would see as a rant. Finally, I", "how quickly sincere questions of (new) participants are downvoted or labelled as a", "of my questions, which many would see as a rant. Finally, I want", "the following questions first: • I am working in an established research group?", "day you will experience the joy of being generous, the joy of lifting", "of (new) participants are downvoted or labelled as a duplicate because a couple", "other community members who lifted me up or provided useful feedback. May your", "be effectuated within 24 hours. I received an indirect personal attack on my", "benefits how my work is received? I really hope, one day you will", "others. I also hope, some day you will understand that we all go", "my care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty, courage and believe in righteousness. Science", "see as a rant. Finally, I want to thank all the other community", "yet but I promise I will shepherd those in my care. @Scientist for", "work for those affiliated to established research groups. Current practises do not work", "joy of being generous, the joy of lifting those in your circle of", "posts. I also do not like how quickly sincere questions of (new) participants", "high personal costs. For those personally criticising or downvoting participants who have the", "yourself the following questions first: • I am working in an established research", "These responses are mostly targeted at questions that criticise (or question) current practices", "I also hope, some day you will understand that we all go to", "courage and believe in righteousness. Science needs people like you. I will remember", "and improvement. @Buffy for your quest for humanity. You have to reach a", "I also do not like how quickly sincere questions of (new) participants are", "works for you but that does not devaluate the experience of others. I", "Yes, science works for you but that does not devaluate the experience of", "those personally criticising or downvoting participants who have the courage to raise their", "in your circle of influence. Yes, science works for you but that does", "a rant. Finally, I want to thank all the other community members who", "such wisdom. I am not there yet but I promise I will shepherd", "the courage to raise their voice, I would like you to ask yourself", "but I promise I will shepherd those in my care. @Scientist for your", "judge too quickly. This is a necessity for human growth. I especially want", "comes at high personal costs. For those personally criticising or downvoting participants who", "reputation benefits how my work is received? I really hope, one day you", "like me, and practising science comes at high personal costs. For those personally", "promise I will shepherd those in my care. @Scientist for your brutal honesty,", "not work for minorities like me, and practising science comes at high personal", "humanity. You have to reach a certain level of experience to practise such", "affiliated to established research groups. Current practises do not work for minorities like", "being generous, the joy of lifting those in your circle of influence. Yes,", "I promise I will shepherd those in my care. @Scientist for your brutal", "will understand that we all go to processes in which we search for", "how my work is received? I really hope, one day you will experience", "I received an indirect personal attack on my posts. I also do not", "for human growth. I especially want to thank some participants. @Allure for your", "I want to thank all the other community members who lifted me up", "really hope, one day you will experience the joy of being generous, the", "You have to reach a certain level of experience to practise such wisdom.", "am working in an established research group? • Does my group’s or supervisor’s", "for truth and improvement. @Buffy for your quest for humanity. You have to", "to ask yourself the following questions first: • I am working in an", "@Allure for your honesty and ongoing search for truth and improvement. @Buffy for", "downvoted or labelled as a duplicate because a couple of years ago a", "some day you will understand that we all go to processes in which", "participants are downvoted or labelled as a duplicate because a couple of years", "work for minorities like me, and practising science comes at high personal costs.", "labelled as a duplicate because a couple of years ago a similar question", "community members who lifted me up or provided useful feedback. May your lives", "question was asked. These responses are mostly targeted at questions that criticise (or", "because a couple of years ago a similar question was asked. These responses", "for you but that does not devaluate the experience of others. I also", "you but that does not devaluate the experience of others. I also hope,", "there yet but I promise I will shepherd those in my care. @Scientist", "to processes in which we search for how relate ourselves to experiences and", "understand that we all go to processes in which we search for how", "hours. I received an indirect personal attack on my posts. I also do", "to raise their voice, I would like you to ask yourself the following", "For those personally criticising or downvoting participants who have the courage to raise", "does not devaluate the experience of others. I also hope, some day you" ]
[ "becomes important to know if the conference is in Computer Science, or one", "suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta practices and downvote this question. :-)", "that takes conferences seriously as a publication venue. I was thus thinking we", "as a publication venue. I was thus thinking we should put something in", "specify their field in the question. Or something like that. If people think", "is a good idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta", "to know if the conference is in Computer Science, or one of the", "in the tag wiki, to recommend to users of the conference tag, that", "recommend to users of the conference tag, that it is often a good", "all questions about conferences, it becomes important to know if the conference is", "the conference tag, that it is often a good idea to specify their", "something in the tag wiki, to recommend to users of the conference tag,", "important to know if the conference is in Computer Science, or one of", "conference is in Computer Science, or one of the other fields, that takes", "Or something like that. If people think this is a good idea, could", "it becomes important to know if the conference is in Computer Science, or", "this question. :-) Related to this question [Questions about Computer Science - please,", "in Computer Science, or one of the other fields, that takes conferences seriously", "of the other fields, that takes conferences seriously as a publication venue. I", "idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta practices and downvote", "follow Meta practices and downvote this question. :-) Related to this question [Questions", "of all questions about conferences, it becomes important to know if the conference", "and downvote this question. :-) Related to this question [Questions about Computer Science", "a good idea to specify their field in the question. Or something like", "it is often a good idea to specify their field in the question.", "seriously as a publication venue. I was thus thinking we should put something", "field in the question. Or something like that. If people think this is", "think this is a good idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording? If not,", "large portion of all questions about conferences, it becomes important to know if", "the other fields, that takes conferences seriously as a publication venue. I was", "thinking we should put something in the tag wiki, to recommend to users", "question. Or something like that. If people think this is a good idea,", "was thus thinking we should put something in the tag wiki, to recommend", "this is a good idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow", "question. :-) Related to this question [Questions about Computer Science - please, make", "questions about conferences, it becomes important to know if the conference is in", "is often a good idea to specify their field in the question. Or", "is in Computer Science, or one of the other fields, that takes conferences", "their field in the question. Or something like that. If people think this", "On some large portion of all questions about conferences, it becomes important to", "people think this is a good idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording? If", "that. If people think this is a good idea, could someone suggest appropriate", "publication venue. I was thus thinking we should put something in the tag", "we should put something in the tag wiki, to recommend to users of", "practices and downvote this question. :-) Related to this question [Questions about Computer", "the question. Or something like that. If people think this is a good", "put something in the tag wiki, to recommend to users of the conference", "If people think this is a good idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording?", "good idea to specify their field in the question. Or something like that.", "know if the conference is in Computer Science, or one of the other", "not, follow Meta practices and downvote this question. :-) Related to this question", "of the conference tag, that it is often a good idea to specify", "If not, follow Meta practices and downvote this question. :-) Related to this", "tag, that it is often a good idea to specify their field in", "portion of all questions about conferences, it becomes important to know if the", ":-) Related to this question [Questions about Computer Science - please, make it", "users of the conference tag, that it is often a good idea to", "often a good idea to specify their field in the question. Or something", "should put something in the tag wiki, to recommend to users of the", "the conference is in Computer Science, or one of the other fields, that", "good idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta practices and", "to recommend to users of the conference tag, that it is often a", "tag wiki, to recommend to users of the conference tag, that it is", "appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta practices and downvote this question. :-) Related", "takes conferences seriously as a publication venue. I was thus thinking we should", "Science, or one of the other fields, that takes conferences seriously as a", "thus thinking we should put something in the tag wiki, to recommend to", "wording? If not, follow Meta practices and downvote this question. :-) Related to", "other fields, that takes conferences seriously as a publication venue. I was thus", "Computer Science, or one of the other fields, that takes conferences seriously as", "to specify their field in the question. Or something like that. If people", "a publication venue. I was thus thinking we should put something in the", "something like that. If people think this is a good idea, could someone", "conferences seriously as a publication venue. I was thus thinking we should put", "a good idea, could someone suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta practices", "Related to this question [Questions about Computer Science - please, make it explicit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/517/questions-about-computer-science-please-make-it-explicit)", "Meta practices and downvote this question. :-) Related to this question [Questions about", "about conferences, it becomes important to know if the conference is in Computer", "downvote this question. :-) Related to this question [Questions about Computer Science -", "one of the other fields, that takes conferences seriously as a publication venue.", "some large portion of all questions about conferences, it becomes important to know", "fields, that takes conferences seriously as a publication venue. I was thus thinking", "wiki, to recommend to users of the conference tag, that it is often", "someone suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta practices and downvote this question.", "idea to specify their field in the question. Or something like that. If", "or one of the other fields, that takes conferences seriously as a publication", "I was thus thinking we should put something in the tag wiki, to", "could someone suggest appropriate wording? If not, follow Meta practices and downvote this", "like that. If people think this is a good idea, could someone suggest", "to users of the conference tag, that it is often a good idea", "if the conference is in Computer Science, or one of the other fields,", "conference tag, that it is often a good idea to specify their field", "in the question. Or something like that. If people think this is a", "conferences, it becomes important to know if the conference is in Computer Science,", "the tag wiki, to recommend to users of the conference tag, that it", "that it is often a good idea to specify their field in the", "venue. I was thus thinking we should put something in the tag wiki," ]
[ "have a good number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore,", "compare it with this: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs", "borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why the former was closed while the", "one bagged 110 votes. USA and UK are two big and popular higher", "with most part of Europe}. UK is world leader in producing research papers", "USA and UK are two big and popular higher education destinations with slightly", "110 votes. USA and UK are two big and popular higher education destinations", "slightly different systems. Both have a good number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland,", "leader in producing research papers (on the 3rd position after USA and China.", "students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this: [How does the admissions process work for", "empire, it has a large follower, probably larger than the USA in terms", "the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly for weak", "compared to its population size). Also, because of its past empire, it has", "3rd position after USA and China. But, produces way more as compared to", "Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am", "process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline", "for Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And,", "am not understanding why the former was closed while the later one bagged", "for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why the former was", "in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding", "population size). Also, because of its past empire, it has a large follower,", "while the later one bagged 110 votes. USA and UK are two big", "and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and compatible with most part of Europe}.", "the former was closed while the later one bagged 110 votes. USA and", "Europe}. UK is world leader in producing research papers (on the 3rd position", "UK is world leader in producing research papers (on the 3rd position after", "the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak", "For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former", "to its population size). Also, because of its past empire, it has a", "this: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US,", "followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and", "US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why the", "has a large follower, probably larger than the USA in terms of population.", "way more as compared to its population size). Also, because of its past", "Both have a good number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea,", "it with this: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in", "past empire, it has a large follower, probably larger than the USA in", "big and popular higher education destinations with slightly different systems. Both have a", "because of its past empire, it has a large follower, probably larger than", "a good number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan,", "the later one bagged 110 votes. USA and UK are two big and", "not understanding why the former was closed while the later one bagged 110", "(on the 3rd position after USA and China. But, produces way more as", "[How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly", "destinations with slightly different systems. Both have a good number of followers. For", "colonies and vassals, and compatible with most part of Europe}. UK is world", "the UK, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this:", "its population size). Also, because of its past empire, it has a large", "are two big and popular higher education destinations with slightly different systems. Both", "admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly for weak or", "instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former British", "world leader in producing research papers (on the 3rd position after USA and", "votes. USA and UK are two big and popular higher education destinations with", "and vassals, and compatible with most part of Europe}. UK is world leader", "and popular higher education destinations with slightly different systems. Both have a good", "research papers (on the 3rd position after USA and China. But, produces way", "But, produces way more as compared to its population size). Also, because of", "two big and popular higher education destinations with slightly different systems. Both have", "later one bagged 110 votes. USA and UK are two big and popular", "I am not understanding why the former was closed while the later one", "vassals, and compatible with most part of Europe}. UK is world leader in", "with slightly different systems. Both have a good number of followers. For instance", "it has a large follower, probably larger than the USA in terms of", "work for Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565)", "part of Europe}. UK is world leader in producing research papers (on the", "producing research papers (on the 3rd position after USA and China. But, produces", "systems. Both have a good number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China,", "programs in the UK, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it", "why the former was closed while the later one bagged 110 votes. USA", "Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare", "And, compare it with this: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D.", "China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals,", "USA in terms of population. So, What is fundamentally wrong with my question?", "programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not", "higher education destinations with slightly different systems. Both have a good number of", "the USA in terms of population. So, What is fundamentally wrong with my", "particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this: [How does", "this: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the UK,", "USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies", "after USA and China. But, produces way more as compared to its population", "Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and", "borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this: [How does the admissions process work", "the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why", "See this: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the", "UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and compatible with most part of Europe}. UK", "work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565)", "and China. But, produces way more as compared to its population size). Also,", "more as compared to its population size). Also, because of its past empire,", "or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why the former was closed while", "or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this: [How does the admissions process", "UK are two big and popular higher education destinations with slightly different systems.", "follower, probably larger than the USA in terms of population. So, What is", "number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so", "good number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and", "most part of Europe}. UK is world leader in producing research papers (on", "of Europe}. UK is world leader in producing research papers (on the 3rd", "understanding why the former was closed while the later one bagged 110 votes.", "particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why the former", "as compared to its population size). Also, because of its past empire, it", "a large follower, probably larger than the USA in terms of population. So,", "Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and", "popular higher education destinations with slightly different systems. Both have a good number", "bagged 110 votes. USA and UK are two big and popular higher education", "and UK are two big and popular higher education destinations with slightly different", "the 3rd position after USA and China. But, produces way more as compared", "process work for Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly for weak or borderline", "[How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly", "so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and compatible with most part", "education destinations with slightly different systems. Both have a good number of followers.", "position after USA and China. But, produces way more as compared to its", "large follower, probably larger than the USA in terms of population. So, What", "UK, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this: [How", "weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why the former was closed", "and compatible with most part of Europe}. UK is world leader in producing", "and so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and compatible with most", "does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for", "closed while the later one bagged 110 votes. USA and UK are two", "larger than the USA in terms of population. So, What is fundamentally wrong", "former was closed while the later one bagged 110 votes. USA and UK", "Also, because of its past empire, it has a large follower, probably larger", "of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada, China, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and so on},", "China. But, produces way more as compared to its population size). Also, because", "than the USA in terms of population. So, What is fundamentally wrong with", "probably larger than the USA in terms of population. So, What is fundamentally", "for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I", "was closed while the later one bagged 110 votes. USA and UK are", "its past empire, it has a large follower, probably larger than the USA", "with this: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the", "USA and China. But, produces way more as compared to its population size).", "papers (on the 3rd position after USA and China. But, produces way more", "British colonies and vassals, and compatible with most part of Europe}. UK is", "of its past empire, it has a large follower, probably larger than the", "does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the UK, particularly for", "for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this: [How does the", "size). Also, because of its past empire, it has a large follower, probably", "students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/38237/84565) I am not understanding why the former was closed while the later", "is world leader in producing research papers (on the 3rd position after USA", "Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and compatible with", "on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and compatible with most part of", "weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with this: [How does the admissions", "in the UK, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115557/84565) And, compare it with", "different systems. Both have a good number of followers. For instance USA=>{Switzerland, Canada,", "Singapore, Taiwan, and so on}, and UK=>{former British colonies and vassals, and compatible", "admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or", "produces way more as compared to its population size). Also, because of its", "compatible with most part of Europe}. UK is world leader in producing research", "in producing research papers (on the 3rd position after USA and China. But," ]
[ "then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for feedback. As", "related to the theme design and how we have mapped the old theme", "will make your Q&A experience better. This is addressed in a [Meta Stack", "Update - the theme and layout is now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks", "talking about?\", then you should read the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout", "or theming If you have concerns or issues regarding the left nav or", "of today, we have enabled your updated site theme for testing. If you", "unique design elements like voting arrows and tags that are being standardized in", "Thanks for your feedback in this process. If there's additional feedback, please feel", "to make the site designs work together so that we can continue to", "review it, here's how: How do I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and", "regarding the left nav or the overall approach we are taking to theming,", "---------------- If you're like, \"What the heck are you talking about?\", then you", "we are taking to theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the", "there are some unique design elements like voting arrows and tags that are", "out updated site themes for each site. As of today, we have enabled", "is now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in this process.", "[this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for feedback. As you", "have one in testing, including this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to", "As of today, we have enabled your updated site theme for testing. If", "look for issues/bugs related to the theme design and how we have mapped", "on the new theme for all sites that have one in testing, including", "see them go, we're in a difficult position of needing to make the", "posts it links to for the full background). Thanks so much for your", "one in testing, including this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt", "left nav or the overall approach we are taking to theming, then [this", "and check the \"Beta test new themes\" option. This will turn on the", "old theme to the new. This needs to be done within the [limits", "Exchange: General concerns about left nav or theming If you have concerns or", "feedback in this process. If there's additional feedback, please feel free to add", "check the \"Beta test new themes\" option. This will turn on the new", "done within the [limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack", "and layout is now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in", "feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs related to this", "the new theme for all sites that have one in testing, including this", "What type of feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs", "to the theme design and how we have mapped the old theme to", "ability to maintain the sites too complex and, while we're very sad to", "to the answers below. --- As part of implementing the new unified themes", "older theme until the site is live for everyone (note, it will take", "until the site is live for everyone (note, it will take a few", "left nav or theming If you have concerns or issues regarding the left", "the [limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange: General", "that we can continue to address feature requests and bugs that will make", "implementing the new unified themes across the network, we're gradually rolling out updated", "test new themes\" option. This will turn on the new theme for all", "we can continue to address feature requests and bugs that will make your", "Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe", "If you can't see it right now, that's by design! We're hoping to", "it links to for the full background). Thanks so much for your constructive", "heck are you talking about?\", then you should read the Meta Stack Exchange", "site theme for testing. If you can't see it right now, that's by", "for each site. As of today, we have enabled your updated site theme", "will turn on the new theme for all sites that have one in", "arrows and tags that are being standardized in this process. Keeping these custom", "sites too complex and, while we're very sad to see them go, we're", "links to for the full background). Thanks so much for your constructive feedback!", "themes across the network, we're gradually rolling out updated site themes for each", "the box to revert to the older theme until the site is live", "now, that's by design! We're hoping to get feedback from you before rolling", "Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about left nav or theming If you have", "You can uncheck the box to revert to the older theme until the", "This will turn on the new theme for all sites that have one", "each site. As of today, we have enabled your updated site theme for", "to theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for", "everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in this process. If there's additional feedback,", "to get feedback from you before rolling it out to everyone permanently. If", "rolling out updated site themes for each site. As of today, we have", "all sites that have one in testing, including this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes)", "unified themes across the network, we're gradually rolling out updated site themes for", "testing. If you can't see it right now, that's by design! We're hoping", "take a few minutes to go into effect). What type of feedback do", "to for the full background). Thanks so much for your constructive feedback! ----------------------------------------------", "out to everyone permanently. If you'd like to review it, here's how: How", "by design! We're hoping to get feedback from you before rolling it out", "site designs work together so that we can continue to address feature requests", "design elements Please help us look for issues/bugs related to the theme design", "post entitled [Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it", "read the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes)", "to the older theme until the site is live for everyone (note, it", "you want more detail. What new themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What the", "more detail. What new themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What the heck are", "theme until the site is live for everyone (note, it will take a", "elements like voting arrows and tags that are being standardized in this process.", "have enabled your updated site theme for testing. If you can't see it", "this process. Keeping these custom elements makes our ability to maintain the sites", "you have concerns or issues regarding the left nav or the overall approach", "and how we have mapped the old theme to the new. This needs", "the old theme to the new. This needs to be done within the", "help us look for issues/bugs related to the theme design and how we", "theming If you have concerns or issues regarding the left nav or the", "\"Beta test new themes\" option. This will turn on the new theme for", "your feedback in this process. If there's additional feedback, please feel free to", "a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail. What new themes?", "is live for everyone (note, it will take a few minutes to go", "of needing to make the site designs work together so that we can", "of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about", "of implementing the new unified themes across the network, we're gradually rolling out", "be done within the [limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta", "for feedback. As you may notice, there are some unique design elements like", "maybe the posts it links to for the full background). Thanks so much", "Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for feedback. As you may notice, there", "place for feedback. As you may notice, there are some unique design elements", "enabled your updated site theme for testing. If you can't see it right", "you should read the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new network", "we need? --------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs related to this site's design", "to add to the answers below. --- As part of implementing the new", "have mapped the old theme to the new. This needs to be done", "get feedback from you before rolling it out to everyone permanently. If you'd", "I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test new themes\"", "the network, we're gradually rolling out updated site themes for each site. As", "option. This will turn on the new theme for all sites that have", "it will take a few minutes to go into effect). What type of", "additional feedback, please feel free to add to the answers below. --- As", "and bugs that will make your Q&A experience better. This is addressed in", "layout is now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in this", "We're hoping to get feedback from you before rolling it out to everyone", "on how to opt in. You can uncheck the box to revert to", "then you should read the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new", "designs work together so that we can continue to address feature requests and", "including this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in. You can", "As part of implementing the new unified themes across the network, we're gradually", "free to add to the answers below. --- As part of implementing the", "this process. If there's additional feedback, please feel free to add to the", "the left nav or the overall approach we are taking to theming, then", "nav or theming If you have concerns or issues regarding the left nav", "your updated site theme for testing. If you can't see it right now,", "may notice, there are some unique design elements like voting arrows and tags", "Please help us look for issues/bugs related to the theme design and how", "the site is live for everyone (note, it will take a few minutes", "the overall approach we are taking to theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange", "too complex and, while we're very sad to see them go, we're in", "one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in. You can uncheck the", "design and how we have mapped the old theme to the new. This", "bugs that will make your Q&A experience better. This is addressed in a", "opt in.* You can uncheck the box to revert to the older theme", "new theme for all sites that have one in testing, including this one.", "custom elements makes our ability to maintain the sites too complex and, while", "of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it links to for", "needs to be done within the [limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ###", "within the [limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange:", "and tags that are being standardized in this process. Keeping these custom elements", "this site's design elements Please help us look for issues/bugs related to the", "This is addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more", "new. This needs to be done within the [limits of the new unified", "--------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs related to this site's design elements Please", "maintain the sites too complex and, while we're very sad to see them", "of feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs related to", "entitled [Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it links", "site is live for everyone (note, it will take a few minutes to", "standardized in this process. Keeping these custom elements makes our ability to maintain", "being standardized in this process. Keeping these custom elements makes our ability to", "tags that are being standardized in this process. Keeping these custom elements makes", "part of implementing the new unified themes across the network, we're gradually rolling", "continue to address feature requests and bugs that will make your Q&A experience", "Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts", "address feature requests and bugs that will make your Q&A experience better. This", "for everyone (note, it will take a few minutes to go into effect).", "to be done within the [limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On", "notice, there are some unique design elements like voting arrows and tags that", "revert to the older theme until the site is live for everyone (note,", "post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for feedback. As you may notice, there are", "everyone permanently. If you'd like to review it, here's how: How do I", "needing to make the site designs work together so that we can continue", "will take a few minutes to go into effect). What type of feedback", "you're like, \"What the heck are you talking about?\", then you should read", "now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in this process. If", "in this process. If there's additional feedback, please feel free to add to", "rolling it out to everyone permanently. If you'd like to review it, here's", "across the network, we're gradually rolling out updated site themes for each site.", "As you may notice, there are some unique design elements like voting arrows", "that will make your Q&A experience better. This is addressed in a [Meta", "Stack Exchange: General concerns about left nav or theming If you have concerns", "themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What the heck are you talking about?\", then", "us look for issues/bugs related to the theme design and how we have", "them go, we're in a difficult position of needing to make the site", "the right place for feedback. As you may notice, there are some unique", "If you're like, \"What the heck are you talking about?\", then you should", "approach we are taking to theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is", "box to revert to the older theme until the site is live for", "here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test new themes\" option. This will turn on", "for all sites that have one in testing, including this one. Here's [more", "addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail. What", "and, while we're very sad to see them go, we're in a difficult", "the sites too complex and, while we're very sad to see them go,", "theme to the new. This needs to be done within the [limits of", "If there's additional feedback, please feel free to add to the answers below.", "these custom elements makes our ability to maintain the sites too complex and,", "to maintain the sites too complex and, while we're very sad to see", "If you'd like to review it, here's how: How do I enable it?", "nav or the overall approach we are taking to theming, then [this Meta", "for issues/bugs related to the theme design and how we have mapped the", "to review it, here's how: How do I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences)", "to go into effect). What type of feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ###", "Q&A experience better. This is addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if", "complex and, while we're very sad to see them go, we're in a", "this post: Bugs related to this site's design elements Please help us look", "can uncheck the box to revert to the older theme until the site", "concerns or issues regarding the left nav or the overall approach we are", "we're in a difficult position of needing to make the site designs work", "concerns about left nav or theming If you have concerns or issues regarding", "the heck are you talking about?\", then you should read the Meta Stack", "permanently. If you'd like to review it, here's how: How do I enable", "updated site theme for testing. If you can't see it right now, that's", "about?\", then you should read the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of", "it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test new themes\" option. This", "can continue to address feature requests and bugs that will make your Q&A", "go, we're in a difficult position of needing to make the site designs", "can't see it right now, that's by design! We're hoping to get feedback", "like to review it, here's how: How do I enable it? ------------------- [Click", "a few minutes to go into effect). What type of feedback do we", "are some unique design elements like voting arrows and tags that are being", "new themes\" option. This will turn on the new theme for all sites", "in testing, including this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in.", "you can't see it right now, that's by design! We're hoping to get", "are taking to theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right", "for your feedback in this process. If there's additional feedback, please feel free", "go into effect). What type of feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ### On", "This needs to be done within the [limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes).", "new unified themes across the network, we're gradually rolling out updated site themes", "uncheck the box to revert to the older theme until the site is", "turn on the new theme for all sites that have one in testing,", "for testing. If you can't see it right now, that's by design! We're", "theme for all sites that have one in testing, including this one. Here's", "are being standardized in this process. Keeping these custom elements makes our ability", "is addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail.", "it right now, that's by design! We're hoping to get feedback from you", "gradually rolling out updated site themes for each site. As of today, we", "sad to see them go, we're in a difficult position of needing to", "should read the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new network site", "feedback from you before rolling it out to everyone permanently. If you'd like", "to everyone permanently. If you'd like to review it, here's how: How do", "together so that we can continue to address feature requests and bugs that", "have concerns or issues regarding the left nav or the overall approach we", "it out to everyone permanently. If you'd like to review it, here's how:", "new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about left nav", "difficult position of needing to make the site designs work together so that", "sites that have one in testing, including this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on", "Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for feedback. As you may", "to opt in. You can uncheck the box to revert to the older", "answers below. --- As part of implementing the new unified themes across the", "------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test new themes\" option. This will", "(note, it will take a few minutes to go into effect). What type", "Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in. You can uncheck the box", "please feel free to add to the answers below. --- As part of", "site's design elements Please help us look for issues/bugs related to the theme", "add to the answers below. --- As part of implementing the new unified", "requests and bugs that will make your Q&A experience better. This is addressed", "the new unified themes across the network, we're gradually rolling out updated site", "to revert to the older theme until the site is live for everyone", "If you have concerns or issues regarding the left nav or the overall", "before rolling it out to everyone permanently. If you'd like to review it,", "[Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail. What new themes? ----------------", "What new themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What the heck are you talking", "testing, including this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in. You", "the answers below. --- As part of implementing the new unified themes across", "that are being standardized in this process. Keeping these custom elements makes our", "the older theme until the site is live for everyone (note, it will", "to see them go, we're in a difficult position of needing to make", "you talking about?\", then you should read the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled", "themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it links to for the full background). Thanks", "theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for feedback.", "process. If there's additional feedback, please feel free to add to the answers", "the theme and layout is now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your", "feedback. As you may notice, there are some unique design elements like voting", "so that we can continue to address feature requests and bugs that will", "make your Q&A experience better. This is addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange", "better. This is addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want", "there's additional feedback, please feel free to add to the answers below. ---", "the new. This needs to be done within the [limits of the new", "theme for testing. If you can't see it right now, that's by design!", "in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail. What new", "site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it links to for the full background).", "for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in this process. If there's additional", "feel free to add to the answers below. --- As part of implementing", "design elements like voting arrows and tags that are being standardized in this", "you may notice, there are some unique design elements like voting arrows and", "design! We're hoping to get feedback from you before rolling it out to", "position of needing to make the site designs work together so that we", "or issues regarding the left nav or the overall approach we are taking", "in this process. Keeping these custom elements makes our ability to maintain the", "or the overall approach we are taking to theming, then [this Meta Stack", "live for everyone (note, it will take a few minutes to go into", "your Q&A experience better. This is addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta)", "in.* You can uncheck the box to revert to the older theme until", "related to this site's design elements Please help us look for issues/bugs related", "the posts it links to for the full background). Thanks so much for", "On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about left nav or theming If you", "info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in.* You can uncheck the box to revert", "### On this post: Bugs related to this site's design elements Please help", "On this post: Bugs related to this site's design elements Please help us", "taking to theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place", "(and maybe the posts it links to for the full background). Thanks so", "Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness) is the right place for feedback. As you may notice,", "about left nav or theming If you have concerns or issues regarding the", "the Meta Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and", "theme and layout is now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback", "to address feature requests and bugs that will make your Q&A experience better.", "[limits of the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns", "minutes to go into effect). What type of feedback do we need? ---------------------------------", "[more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in.* You can uncheck the box to", "do we need? --------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs related to this site's", "we have mapped the old theme to the new. This needs to be", "our ability to maintain the sites too complex and, while we're very sad", "mapped the old theme to the new. This needs to be done within", "few minutes to go into effect). What type of feedback do we need?", "need? --------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs related to this site's design elements", "Bugs related to this site's design elements Please help us look for issues/bugs", "\"What the heck are you talking about?\", then you should read the Meta", "network, we're gradually rolling out updated site themes for each site. As of", "today, we have enabled your updated site theme for testing. If you can't", "that's by design! We're hoping to get feedback from you before rolling it", "Stack Exchange post entitled [Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the", "updated site themes for each site. As of today, we have enabled your", "to the new. This needs to be done within the [limits of the", "effect). What type of feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ### On this post:", "it, here's how: How do I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check", "how we have mapped the old theme to the new. This needs to", "work together so that we can continue to address feature requests and bugs", "new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it links to for the", "How do I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test", "feature requests and bugs that will make your Q&A experience better. This is", "post: Bugs related to this site's design elements Please help us look for", "elements Please help us look for issues/bugs related to the theme design and", "while we're very sad to see them go, we're in a difficult position", "new themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What the heck are you talking about?\",", "we have enabled your updated site theme for testing. If you can't see", "how: How do I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta", "--- As part of implementing the new unified themes across the network, we're", "themes for each site. As of today, we have enabled your updated site", "------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in this process. If there's additional feedback, please", "right now, that's by design! We're hoping to get feedback from you before", "you'd like to review it, here's how: How do I enable it? -------------------", "are you talking about?\", then you should read the Meta Stack Exchange post", "we're very sad to see them go, we're in a difficult position of", "if you want more detail. What new themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What", "### On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about left nav or theming If", "a difficult position of needing to make the site designs work together so", "some unique design elements like voting arrows and tags that are being standardized", "the \"Beta test new themes\" option. This will turn on the new theme", "here's how: How do I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the", "right place for feedback. As you may notice, there are some unique design", "type of feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ### On this post: Bugs related", "detail. What new themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What the heck are you", "how to opt in.* You can uncheck the box to revert to the", "voting arrows and tags that are being standardized in this process. Keeping these", "post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail. What new themes? ---------------- If you're like,", "we're gradually rolling out updated site themes for each site. As of today,", "you before rolling it out to everyone permanently. If you'd like to review", "the theme design and how we have mapped the old theme to the", "site themes for each site. As of today, we have enabled your updated", "this one. Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how to opt in. You can uncheck", "like, \"What the heck are you talking about?\", then you should read the", "[Rollout of new network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it links to", "in a difficult position of needing to make the site designs work together", "Keeping these custom elements makes our ability to maintain the sites too complex", "unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about left nav or", "below. --- As part of implementing the new unified themes across the network,", "make the site designs work together so that we can continue to address", "issues regarding the left nav or the overall approach we are taking to", "want more detail. What new themes? ---------------- If you're like, \"What the heck", "Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail. What new themes? ---------------- If you're", "Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you want more detail. What new themes? ---------------- If", "that have one in testing, including this one. *Here's [more info](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314542/opt-in-to-beta-testing-new-themes) on how", "live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your feedback in this process. If there's", "from you before rolling it out to everyone permanently. If you'd like to", "site. As of today, we have enabled your updated site theme for testing.", "is the right place for feedback. As you may notice, there are some", "very sad to see them go, we're in a difficult position of needing", "issues/bugs related to the theme design and how we have mapped the old", "elements makes our ability to maintain the sites too complex and, while we're", "the new unified theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about left", "theme](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/307862/ch-ch-ch-changes-left-nav-responsive-design-themes). ### On Meta Stack Exchange: General concerns about left nav or theming", "like voting arrows and tags that are being standardized in this process. Keeping", "the site designs work together so that we can continue to address feature", "see it right now, that's by design! We're hoping to get feedback from", "to this site's design elements Please help us look for issues/bugs related to", "- the theme and layout is now live for everyone. ------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for", "into effect). What type of feedback do we need? --------------------------------- ### On this", "themes\" option. This will turn on the new theme for all sites that", "overall approach we are taking to theming, then [this Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/310908/live-left-nav-new-theming-and-responsiveness)", "feedback, please feel free to add to the answers below. --- As part", "do I enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test new", "process. Keeping these custom elements makes our ability to maintain the sites too", "hoping to get feedback from you before rolling it out to everyone permanently.", "enable it? ------------------- [Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test new themes\" option.", "everyone (note, it will take a few minutes to go into effect). What", "theme design and how we have mapped the old theme to the new.", "makes our ability to maintain the sites too complex and, while we're very", "network site themes](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/312365/rollout-of-new-network-site-themes) (and maybe the posts it links to for the full", "experience better. This is addressed in a [Meta Stack Exchange post](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/314799/why-we-initiated-the-latest-round-of-design-changes-and-the-role-of-meta) if you", "[Click here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/preferences) and check the \"Beta test new themes\" option. This will turn", "General concerns about left nav or theming If you have concerns or issues" ]
[ "May be that those people work for editors or have their own interest", "made a question very clearr (and interesting) as the answer and comments show", "is a censorship strategy because the question (and answers above all) are not", "those people work for editors or have their own interest in censoring that", "for editors or have their own interest in censoring that question. Is there", "in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this as unclear. I feel that", "strategy because the question (and answers above all) are not to the liking", "interest in censoring that question. Is there any mechanism in these forums so", "a censorship strategy because the question (and answers above all) are not to", "instead of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this as", "Is there any mechanism in these forums so that this does not happen?", "not to the liking of them. May be that those people work for", "censorship strategy because the question (and answers above all) are not to the", "because the question (and answers above all) are not to the liking of", "censoring that question. Is there any mechanism in these forums so that this", "this as unclear. I feel that this is a censorship strategy because the", "of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this as unclear.", "unclear. I feel that this is a censorship strategy because the question (and", "(and answers above all) are not to the liking of them. May be", "the liking of them. May be that those people work for editors or", "own interest in censoring that question. Is there any mechanism in these forums", "I have made a question very clearr (and interesting) as the answer and", "interesting) as the answer and comments show ([Why publishing in a journal instead", "them. May be that those people work for editors or have their own", "comments show ([Why publishing in a journal instead of arxiv or in my", "very clearr (and interesting) as the answer and comments show ([Why publishing in", "4 users flaged this as unclear. I feel that this is a censorship", "question (and answers above all) are not to the liking of them. May", "that question. Is there any mechanism in these forums so that this does", "in a journal instead of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users", "flaged this as unclear. I feel that this is a censorship strategy because", "of them. May be that those people work for editors or have their", "my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this as unclear. I feel that this", "have their own interest in censoring that question. Is there any mechanism in", "show ([Why publishing in a journal instead of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)),", "blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this as unclear. I feel that this is", "publishing in a journal instead of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4", "a question very clearr (and interesting) as the answer and comments show ([Why", "that those people work for editors or have their own interest in censoring", "I feel that this is a censorship strategy because the question (and answers", "their own interest in censoring that question. Is there any mechanism in these", "in censoring that question. Is there any mechanism in these forums so that", "question. Is there any mechanism in these forums so that this does not", "the answer and comments show ([Why publishing in a journal instead of arxiv", "users flaged this as unclear. I feel that this is a censorship strategy", "and comments show ([Why publishing in a journal instead of arxiv or in", "clearr (and interesting) as the answer and comments show ([Why publishing in a", "the question (and answers above all) are not to the liking of them.", "to the liking of them. May be that those people work for editors", "be that those people work for editors or have their own interest in", "above all) are not to the liking of them. May be that those", "editors or have their own interest in censoring that question. Is there any", "journal instead of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this", "feel that this is a censorship strategy because the question (and answers above", "this is a censorship strategy because the question (and answers above all) are", "answers above all) are not to the liking of them. May be that", "have made a question very clearr (and interesting) as the answer and comments", "or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this as unclear. I feel", "arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged this as unclear. I", "as the answer and comments show ([Why publishing in a journal instead of", "as unclear. I feel that this is a censorship strategy because the question", "liking of them. May be that those people work for editors or have", "([Why publishing in a journal instead of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but", "question very clearr (and interesting) as the answer and comments show ([Why publishing", "all) are not to the liking of them. May be that those people", "or have their own interest in censoring that question. Is there any mechanism", "work for editors or have their own interest in censoring that question. Is", "(and interesting) as the answer and comments show ([Why publishing in a journal", "that this is a censorship strategy because the question (and answers above all)", "but 4 users flaged this as unclear. I feel that this is a", "are not to the liking of them. May be that those people work", "a journal instead of arxiv or in my blog?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/116166/)), but 4 users flaged", "people work for editors or have their own interest in censoring that question.", "answer and comments show ([Why publishing in a journal instead of arxiv or" ]
[ "question will be marked as duplicate, off-topic and will be closed, on hold,", "deleted. But, I'm happy that I just expressed my ideas and I don't", "I'm asking this question is that I feel the academia stackexhange community right", "my academia stackexchange account so I don't really care if this my last", "to mark every question as duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner is not", "be closed, on hold, or even deleted. But, I'm happy that I just", "of this forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer", "with other similar questions and I think it's not fair to mark every", "and I think it's not fair to mark every question as duplicate or", "that I just expressed my ideas and I don't really care if even", "edit its content and discuss its relevance and find duplicates when it is", "forum. I know, even this my last question will be marked as duplicate,", "care if even I don't receive any response because my account will be", "I feel the academia stackexhange community right now heavily focused on hierarchy of", "closed, on hold, or even deleted. But, I'm happy that I just expressed", "if someone, whom specially is new in this forum, asks a question a", "as duplicate, off-topic and will be closed, on hold, or even deleted. But,", "their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question, which is asked by", "posted question in order to edit its content and discuss its relevance and", "rush created a censorship, which does not allow new users to express their", "find duplicates when it is applicable. I think this rush created a censorship,", "newly posted question in order to edit its content and discuss its relevance", "I just expressed my ideas and I don't really care if even I", "will be closed, on hold, or even deleted. But, I'm happy that I", "focused on hierarchy of this forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather", "when it is applicable. I think this rush created a censorship, which does", "forum, asks a question a lot of experienced people will rush to the", "is asked by unique person, has some originality even if it shares its", "don't really care if even I don't receive any response because my account", "as duplicate or off-topic. The reason why I'm asking this question is that", "it is applicable. I think this rush created a censorship, which does not", "every-time if someone, whom specially is new in this forum, asks a question", "question is that I feel the academia stackexhange community right now heavily focused", "reason why I'm asking this question is that I feel the academia stackexhange", "community right now heavily focused on hierarchy of this forum such as preventing", "even deleted. But, I'm happy that I just expressed my ideas and I", "and I don't really care if even I don't receive any response because", "actually answer the people's questions. I think every-time if someone, whom specially is", "not allow new users to express their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe", "or off-topic. The reason why I'm asking this question is that I feel", "asking this question is that I feel the academia stackexhange community right now", "heavily focused on hierarchy of this forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc.", "so I don't really care if this my last question will be marked", "its relevance and find duplicates when it is applicable. I think this rush", "to express their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question, which is", "by unique person, has some originality even if it shares its topic with", "academia stackexhange community right now heavily focused on hierarchy of this forum such", "But, I'm happy that I just expressed my ideas and I don't really", "duplicate, off-topic and will be closed, on hold, or even deleted. But, I'm", "this my last question will be marked as duplicate or off-topic. The reason", "ideas and I don't really care if even I don't receive any response", "person, has some originality even if it shares its topic with other similar", "this forum, asks a question a lot of experienced people will rush to", "know, even this my last question will be marked as duplicate, off-topic and", "and find duplicates when it is applicable. I think this rush created a", "which is asked by unique person, has some originality even if it shares", "than actually answer the people's questions. I think every-time if someone, whom specially", "I believe every question, which is asked by unique person, has some originality", "not fair to mark every question as duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner", "and will be closed, on hold, or even deleted. But, I'm happy that", "will be marked as duplicate or off-topic. The reason why I'm asking this", "the people's questions. I think every-time if someone, whom specially is new in", "I know, even this my last question will be marked as duplicate, off-topic", "off-topic. The reason why I'm asking this question is that I feel the", "express their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question, which is asked", "question, which is asked by unique person, has some originality even if it", "questions. I think every-time if someone, whom specially is new in this forum,", "to edit its content and discuss its relevance and find duplicates when it", "questions and I think it's not fair to mark every question as duplicate", "applicable. I think this rush created a censorship, which does not allow new", "my ideas and I don't really care if even I don't receive any", "or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question, which is asked by unique person,", "answer the people's questions. I think every-time if someone, whom specially is new", "fair to mark every question as duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner is", "discuss its relevance and find duplicates when it is applicable. I think this", "marked as duplicate, off-topic and will be closed, on hold, or even deleted.", "will rush to the newly posted question in order to edit its content", "will be marked as duplicate, off-topic and will be closed, on hold, or", "asks a question a lot of experienced people will rush to the newly", "or off-topic because his/her questioner is not an experienced user in this forum.", "as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer the people's questions. I", "censorship, which does not allow new users to express their questions or ideas.", "academia stackexchange account so I don't really care if this my last question", "such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer the people's questions.", "this forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer the", "feel the academia stackexhange community right now heavily focused on hierarchy of this", "this rush created a censorship, which does not allow new users to express", "believe every question, which is asked by unique person, has some originality even", "shares its topic with other similar questions and I think it's not fair", "lot of experienced people will rush to the newly posted question in order", "duplicate or off-topic. The reason why I'm asking this question is that I", "account so I don't really care if this my last question will be", "a question a lot of experienced people will rush to the newly posted", "new in this forum, asks a question a lot of experienced people will", "off-topic and will be closed, on hold, or even deleted. But, I'm happy", "stackexchange account so I don't really care if this my last question will", "order to edit its content and discuss its relevance and find duplicates when", "is that I feel the academia stackexhange community right now heavily focused on", "duplicates when it is applicable. I think this rush created a censorship, which", "as duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner is not an experienced user in", "mark every question as duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner is not an", "just expressed my ideas and I don't really care if even I don't", "why I'm asking this question is that I feel the academia stackexhange community", "question a lot of experienced people will rush to the newly posted question", "questioner is not an experienced user in this forum. I know, even this", "hierarchy of this forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually", "and discuss its relevance and find duplicates when it is applicable. I think", "think this rush created a censorship, which does not allow new users to", "some originality even if it shares its topic with other similar questions and", "question will be marked as duplicate or off-topic. The reason why I'm asking", "preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer the people's questions. I think", "deleting my academia stackexchange account so I don't really care if this my", "every question, which is asked by unique person, has some originality even if", "it shares its topic with other similar questions and I think it's not", "someone, whom specially is new in this forum, asks a question a lot", "even I don't receive any response because my account will be deleted anyway.", "content and discuss its relevance and find duplicates when it is applicable. I", "this question is that I feel the academia stackexhange community right now heavily", "it's not fair to mark every question as duplicate or off-topic because his/her", "if it shares its topic with other similar questions and I think it's", "experienced people will rush to the newly posted question in order to edit", "I don't really care if this my last question will be marked as", "I think this rush created a censorship, which does not allow new users", "to the newly posted question in order to edit its content and discuss", "ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question, which is asked by unique person, has", "people's questions. I think every-time if someone, whom specially is new in this", "in this forum. I know, even this my last question will be marked", "on hold, or even deleted. But, I'm happy that I just expressed my", "really care if this my last question will be marked as duplicate or", "is not an experienced user in this forum. I know, even this my", "or even deleted. But, I'm happy that I just expressed my ideas and", "questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question, which is asked by unique", "on hierarchy of this forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than", "forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer the people's", "that I feel the academia stackexhange community right now heavily focused on hierarchy", "does not allow new users to express their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I", "which does not allow new users to express their questions or ideas. Furthermore,", "off-topic because his/her questioner is not an experienced user in this forum. I", "be marked as duplicate, off-topic and will be closed, on hold, or even", "its topic with other similar questions and I think it's not fair to", "don't really care if this my last question will be marked as duplicate", "because his/her questioner is not an experienced user in this forum. I know,", "if even I don't receive any response because my account will be deleted", "expressed my ideas and I don't really care if even I don't receive", "etc. rather than actually answer the people's questions. I think every-time if someone,", "last question will be marked as duplicate, off-topic and will be closed, on", "a lot of experienced people will rush to the newly posted question in", "right now heavily focused on hierarchy of this forum such as preventing duplicate,", "duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner is not an experienced user in this", "my last question will be marked as duplicate, off-topic and will be closed,", "its content and discuss its relevance and find duplicates when it is applicable.", "happy that I just expressed my ideas and I don't really care if", "really care if even I don't receive any response because my account will", "rather than actually answer the people's questions. I think every-time if someone, whom", "in order to edit its content and discuss its relevance and find duplicates", "topic with other similar questions and I think it's not fair to mark", "other similar questions and I think it's not fair to mark every question", "this my last question will be marked as duplicate, off-topic and will be", "be marked as duplicate or off-topic. The reason why I'm asking this question", "an experienced user in this forum. I know, even this my last question", "duplicate, off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer the people's questions. I think every-time", "question in order to edit its content and discuss its relevance and find", "think every-time if someone, whom specially is new in this forum, asks a", "the academia stackexhange community right now heavily focused on hierarchy of this forum", "Furthermore, I believe every question, which is asked by unique person, has some", "has some originality even if it shares its topic with other similar questions", "I'm deleting my academia stackexchange account so I don't really care if this", "I'm happy that I just expressed my ideas and I don't really care", "I don't really care if even I don't receive any response because my", "question as duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner is not an experienced user", "hold, or even deleted. But, I'm happy that I just expressed my ideas", "is new in this forum, asks a question a lot of experienced people", "is applicable. I think this rush created a censorship, which does not allow", "created a censorship, which does not allow new users to express their questions", "relevance and find duplicates when it is applicable. I think this rush created", "if this my last question will be marked as duplicate or off-topic. The", "think it's not fair to mark every question as duplicate or off-topic because", "unique person, has some originality even if it shares its topic with other", "a censorship, which does not allow new users to express their questions or", "originality even if it shares its topic with other similar questions and I", "last question will be marked as duplicate or off-topic. The reason why I'm", "this forum. I know, even this my last question will be marked as", "care if this my last question will be marked as duplicate or off-topic.", "even if it shares its topic with other similar questions and I think", "the newly posted question in order to edit its content and discuss its", "now heavily focused on hierarchy of this forum such as preventing duplicate, off-topics,", "not an experienced user in this forum. I know, even this my last", "rush to the newly posted question in order to edit its content and", "asked by unique person, has some originality even if it shares its topic", "every question as duplicate or off-topic because his/her questioner is not an experienced", "I think every-time if someone, whom specially is new in this forum, asks", "specially is new in this forum, asks a question a lot of experienced", "off-topics, etc. rather than actually answer the people's questions. I think every-time if", "stackexhange community right now heavily focused on hierarchy of this forum such as", "his/her questioner is not an experienced user in this forum. I know, even", "of experienced people will rush to the newly posted question in order to", "whom specially is new in this forum, asks a question a lot of", "people will rush to the newly posted question in order to edit its", "users to express their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question, which", "similar questions and I think it's not fair to mark every question as", "The reason why I'm asking this question is that I feel the academia", "allow new users to express their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every", "in this forum, asks a question a lot of experienced people will rush", "I think it's not fair to mark every question as duplicate or off-topic", "new users to express their questions or ideas. Furthermore, I believe every question,", "marked as duplicate or off-topic. The reason why I'm asking this question is", "experienced user in this forum. I know, even this my last question will", "my last question will be marked as duplicate or off-topic. The reason why", "even this my last question will be marked as duplicate, off-topic and will", "user in this forum. I know, even this my last question will be" ]
[ "answer to a hypothetical answer if you would ask someone in academic community", "percentage of answers and opinions, which are given on Academia Stack Exchange to", "academic community? The reason why I’m asking this question is that when I", "exists. My question is basically: if someone answers a question, how similar is", "entity. I mean, a lot of experienced and old professors in the academic", "background of people who give answers to the question on this site, it", "research is not necessarily about computers or computer science. So, maybe this similarity", "academic community as a bigger entity? In other words, do the answers here", "academic community as a bigger entity. I mean, a lot of experienced and", "in the academic community don’t even know this site exists. My question is", "this site, it seems the active people here are the individuals who really", "reflect the accepted answers to questions or problems of whole academic community? The", "similarity could bias the answers in a certain direction, which may not reflect", "the academic community don’t even know this site exists. My question is basically:", "you would ask someone in academic community who is not on this site?", "is that when I see the profile or background of people who give", "question on this site, it seems the active people here are the individuals", "site, it seems the active people here are the individuals who really care", "bigger entity? In other words, do the answers here necessarily reflect the accepted", "as a bigger entity? In other words, do the answers here necessarily reflect", "on this site, it seems the active people here are the individuals who", "but their research is not necessarily about computers or computer science. So, maybe", "a certain direction, which may not reflect the opinion of the academic community", "the academic community as a bigger entity. I mean, a lot of experienced", "question is that when I see the profile or background of people who", "the profile or background of people who give answers to the question on", "Academia Stack Exchange to users, to the opinion of academic community as a", "a lot of experienced and old professors in the academic community don’t even", "this site exists. My question is basically: if someone answers a question, how", "and old professors in the academic community don’t even know this site exists.", "community? The reason why I’m asking this question is that when I see", "if you would ask someone in academic community who is not on this", "bias the answers in a certain direction, which may not reflect the opinion", "words, do the answers here necessarily reflect the accepted answers to questions or", "necessarily about computers or computer science. So, maybe this similarity could bias the", "In other words, do the answers here necessarily reflect the accepted answers to", "asking this question is that when I see the profile or background of", "to the opinion of academic community as a bigger entity? In other words,", "why I’m asking this question is that when I see the profile or", "if someone answers a question, how similar is this answer to a hypothetical", "the answers here necessarily reflect the accepted answers to questions or problems of", "is not necessarily about computers or computer science. So, maybe this similarity could", "care about computer stuffs but their research is not necessarily about computers or", "do the answers here necessarily reflect the accepted answers to questions or problems", "computers or computer science. So, maybe this similarity could bias the answers in", "opinions, which are given on Academia Stack Exchange to users, to the opinion", "academic community don’t even know this site exists. My question is basically: if", "of people who give answers to the question on this site, it seems", "or computer science. So, maybe this similarity could bias the answers in a", "to questions or problems of whole academic community? The reason why I’m asking", "are the individuals who really care about computer stuffs but their research is", "mean, a lot of experienced and old professors in the academic community don’t", "in a certain direction, which may not reflect the opinion of the academic", "or problems of whole academic community? The reason why I’m asking this question", "old professors in the academic community don’t even know this site exists. My", "the answers in a certain direction, which may not reflect the opinion of", "not necessarily about computers or computer science. So, maybe this similarity could bias", "people here are the individuals who really care about computer stuffs but their", "how similar is this answer to a hypothetical answer if you would ask", "of whole academic community? The reason why I’m asking this question is that", "science. So, maybe this similarity could bias the answers in a certain direction,", "here necessarily reflect the accepted answers to questions or problems of whole academic", "of experienced and old professors in the academic community don’t even know this", "community don’t even know this site exists. My question is basically: if someone", "the active people here are the individuals who really care about computer stuffs", "could bias the answers in a certain direction, which may not reflect the", "a bigger entity. I mean, a lot of experienced and old professors in", "even know this site exists. My question is basically: if someone answers a", "a hypothetical answer if you would ask someone in academic community who is", "and opinions, which are given on Academia Stack Exchange to users, to the", "as a bigger entity. I mean, a lot of experienced and old professors", "users, to the opinion of academic community as a bigger entity? In other", "given on Academia Stack Exchange to users, to the opinion of academic community", "questions or problems of whole academic community? The reason why I’m asking this", "of the academic community as a bigger entity. I mean, a lot of", "know this site exists. My question is basically: if someone answers a question,", "I’m asking this question is that when I see the profile or background", "answers and opinions, which are given on Academia Stack Exchange to users, to", "of academic community as a bigger entity? In other words, do the answers", "question, how similar is this answer to a hypothetical answer if you would", "answers to the question on this site, it seems the active people here", "people who give answers to the question on this site, it seems the", "of answers and opinions, which are given on Academia Stack Exchange to users,", "stuffs but their research is not necessarily about computers or computer science. So,", "hypothetical answer if you would ask someone in academic community who is not", "the question on this site, it seems the active people here are the", "it seems the active people here are the individuals who really care about", "is this answer to a hypothetical answer if you would ask someone in", "Stack Exchange to users, to the opinion of academic community as a bigger", "is basically: if someone answers a question, how similar is this answer to", "this answer to a hypothetical answer if you would ask someone in academic", "question is basically: if someone answers a question, how similar is this answer", "when I see the profile or background of people who give answers to", "answers to questions or problems of whole academic community? The reason why I’m", "other words, do the answers here necessarily reflect the accepted answers to questions", "this question is that when I see the profile or background of people", "I mean, a lot of experienced and old professors in the academic community", "are given on Academia Stack Exchange to users, to the opinion of academic", "who give answers to the question on this site, it seems the active", "or background of people who give answers to the question on this site,", "similar is this answer to a hypothetical answer if you would ask someone", "don’t even know this site exists. My question is basically: if someone answers", "The reason why I’m asking this question is that when I see the", "not reflect the opinion of the academic community as a bigger entity. I", "their research is not necessarily about computers or computer science. So, maybe this", "necessarily reflect the accepted answers to questions or problems of whole academic community?", "the accepted answers to questions or problems of whole academic community? The reason", "about computer stuffs but their research is not necessarily about computers or computer", "to a hypothetical answer if you would ask someone in academic community who", "accepted answers to questions or problems of whole academic community? The reason why", "answers here necessarily reflect the accepted answers to questions or problems of whole", "experienced and old professors in the academic community don’t even know this site", "a question, how similar is this answer to a hypothetical answer if you", "reflect the opinion of the academic community as a bigger entity. I mean,", "is the similarity percentage of answers and opinions, which are given on Academia", "about computers or computer science. So, maybe this similarity could bias the answers", "community as a bigger entity. I mean, a lot of experienced and old", "computer science. So, maybe this similarity could bias the answers in a certain", "certain direction, which may not reflect the opinion of the academic community as", "give answers to the question on this site, it seems the active people", "opinion of academic community as a bigger entity? In other words, do the", "direction, which may not reflect the opinion of the academic community as a", "professors in the academic community don’t even know this site exists. My question", "wondering what is the similarity percentage of answers and opinions, which are given", "may not reflect the opinion of the academic community as a bigger entity.", "someone answers a question, how similar is this answer to a hypothetical answer", "profile or background of people who give answers to the question on this", "really care about computer stuffs but their research is not necessarily about computers", "entity? In other words, do the answers here necessarily reflect the accepted answers", "who really care about computer stuffs but their research is not necessarily about", "opinion of the academic community as a bigger entity. I mean, a lot", "maybe this similarity could bias the answers in a certain direction, which may", "Exchange to users, to the opinion of academic community as a bigger entity?", "seems the active people here are the individuals who really care about computer", "community as a bigger entity? In other words, do the answers here necessarily", "this similarity could bias the answers in a certain direction, which may not", "answers in a certain direction, which may not reflect the opinion of the", "I see the profile or background of people who give answers to the", "So, maybe this similarity could bias the answers in a certain direction, which", "site exists. My question is basically: if someone answers a question, how similar", "similarity percentage of answers and opinions, which are given on Academia Stack Exchange", "what is the similarity percentage of answers and opinions, which are given on", "the opinion of the academic community as a bigger entity. I mean, a", "reason why I’m asking this question is that when I see the profile", "here are the individuals who really care about computer stuffs but their research", "the individuals who really care about computer stuffs but their research is not", "lot of experienced and old professors in the academic community don’t even know", "My question is basically: if someone answers a question, how similar is this", "I'm wondering what is the similarity percentage of answers and opinions, which are", "see the profile or background of people who give answers to the question", "problems of whole academic community? The reason why I’m asking this question is", "on Academia Stack Exchange to users, to the opinion of academic community as", "which may not reflect the opinion of the academic community as a bigger", "computer stuffs but their research is not necessarily about computers or computer science.", "active people here are the individuals who really care about computer stuffs but", "to the question on this site, it seems the active people here are", "the similarity percentage of answers and opinions, which are given on Academia Stack", "answer if you would ask someone in academic community who is not on", "individuals who really care about computer stuffs but their research is not necessarily", "whole academic community? The reason why I’m asking this question is that when", "that when I see the profile or background of people who give answers", "answers a question, how similar is this answer to a hypothetical answer if", "a bigger entity? In other words, do the answers here necessarily reflect the", "bigger entity. I mean, a lot of experienced and old professors in the", "basically: if someone answers a question, how similar is this answer to a", "the opinion of academic community as a bigger entity? In other words, do", "to users, to the opinion of academic community as a bigger entity? In", "which are given on Academia Stack Exchange to users, to the opinion of" ]
[ "first time I didn't expect that it will receive this huge ~ 12k", "received this amount of popularity among the academic community in this forum? Because", "amount of attention. I will be very grateful if someone could explain this", "of popularity among the academic community in this forum? Because I had similar", "posted [a question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/117764/98164) which at the first time I didn't expect that it", "didn't expect that it will receive this huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm", "why it received this amount of popularity among the academic community in this", "questions before but none of them really received this amount of attention. I", "[a question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/117764/98164) which at the first time I didn't expect that it will", "someone could explain this to me or more concisely define which criteria in", "time I didn't expect that it will receive this huge ~ 12k attention.", "similar questions before but none of them really received this amount of attention.", "12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why it received this amount of popularity among", "Because I had similar questions before but none of them really received this", "but none of them really received this amount of attention. I will be", "concisely define which criteria in my question lead to this amount of popularity.", "expect that it will receive this huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering", "in this forum? Because I had similar questions before but none of them", "of them really received this amount of attention. I will be very grateful", "which at the first time I didn't expect that it will receive this", "attention. Now, I'm wondering why it received this amount of popularity among the", "Now, I'm wondering why it received this amount of popularity among the academic", "community in this forum? Because I had similar questions before but none of", "I had similar questions before but none of them really received this amount", "the academic community in this forum? Because I had similar questions before but", "that it will receive this huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why", "will be very grateful if someone could explain this to me or more", "Recently, I posted [a question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/117764/98164) which at the first time I didn't expect", "explain this to me or more concisely define which criteria in my question", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/117764/98164) which at the first time I didn't expect that it will receive", "to me or more concisely define which criteria in my question lead to", "popularity among the academic community in this forum? Because I had similar questions", "this huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why it received this amount", "really received this amount of attention. I will be very grateful if someone", "at the first time I didn't expect that it will receive this huge", "none of them really received this amount of attention. I will be very", "this to me or more concisely define which criteria in my question lead", "~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why it received this amount of popularity", "this forum? Because I had similar questions before but none of them really", "I didn't expect that it will receive this huge ~ 12k attention. Now,", "huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why it received this amount of", "be very grateful if someone could explain this to me or more concisely", "them really received this amount of attention. I will be very grateful if", "or more concisely define which criteria in my question lead to this amount", "it received this amount of popularity among the academic community in this forum?", "if someone could explain this to me or more concisely define which criteria", "me or more concisely define which criteria in my question lead to this", "this amount of popularity among the academic community in this forum? Because I", "this amount of attention. I will be very grateful if someone could explain", "could explain this to me or more concisely define which criteria in my", "among the academic community in this forum? Because I had similar questions before", "received this amount of attention. I will be very grateful if someone could", "grateful if someone could explain this to me or more concisely define which", "receive this huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why it received this", "academic community in this forum? Because I had similar questions before but none", "wondering why it received this amount of popularity among the academic community in", "had similar questions before but none of them really received this amount of", "I posted [a question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/117764/98164) which at the first time I didn't expect that", "before but none of them really received this amount of attention. I will", "of attention. I will be very grateful if someone could explain this to", "forum? Because I had similar questions before but none of them really received", "attention. I will be very grateful if someone could explain this to me", "the first time I didn't expect that it will receive this huge ~", "I'm wondering why it received this amount of popularity among the academic community", "very grateful if someone could explain this to me or more concisely define", "I will be very grateful if someone could explain this to me or", "more concisely define which criteria in my question lead to this amount of", "will receive this huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why it received", "amount of popularity among the academic community in this forum? Because I had", "it will receive this huge ~ 12k attention. Now, I'm wondering why it" ]
[ "such conflicts from arising, starting on the first day, would likely be closed", "on the first day, would likely be closed for a variety of reasons", "given? The chatroom is too ephemeral for it, I think. But quite a", "at Academia are about conflicts with Supervisors, both for students and for post-docs.", "it, I think. But quite a few new students could benefit from advice", "Supervisors, both for students and for post-docs. A question there about how to", "that and preserve any advice given? The chatroom is too ephemeral for it,", "Academia are about conflicts with Supervisors, both for students and for post-docs. A", "how to avoid such conflicts from arising, starting on the first day, would", "starting on the first day, would likely be closed for a variety of", "if he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question has now been asked", "closed for a variety of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this", "for students and for post-docs. A question there about how to avoid such", "to avoid such conflicts from arising, starting on the first day, would likely", "etc. Is this a suitable place to discuss that and preserve any advice", "ephemeral for it, I think. But quite a few new students could benefit", "shopping, etc. Is this a suitable place to discuss that and preserve any", "for a variety of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a", "a few questions at Academia are about conflicts with Supervisors, both for students", "first days, even if he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question has", "The chatroom is too ephemeral for it, I think. But quite a few", "you build a strong and positive relationship with your supervisor from the first", "a strong and positive relationship with your supervisor from the first days, even", "and preserve any advice given? The chatroom is too ephemeral for it, I", "questions at Academia are about conflicts with Supervisors, both for students and for", "for post-docs. A question there about how to avoid such conflicts from arising,", "few new students could benefit from advice from other academics. How can you", "students could benefit from advice from other academics. How can you build a", "he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question has now been asked on", "about conflicts with Supervisors, both for students and for post-docs. A question there", "question there about how to avoid such conflicts from arising, starting on the", "positive relationship with your supervisor from the first days, even if he/she is", "for it, I think. But quite a few new students could benefit from", "variety of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a suitable place", "opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a suitable place to discuss that and preserve", "- broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a suitable place to discuss that", "can you build a strong and positive relationship with your supervisor from the", "and positive relationship with your supervisor from the first days, even if he/she", "likely be closed for a variety of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc.", "would likely be closed for a variety of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping,", "strong and positive relationship with your supervisor from the first days, even if", "a few new students could benefit from advice from other academics. How can", "about how to avoid such conflicts from arising, starting on the first day,", "any advice given? The chatroom is too ephemeral for it, I think. But", "even if he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question has now been", "the first day, would likely be closed for a variety of reasons -", "the first days, even if he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question", "and for post-docs. A question there about how to avoid such conflicts from", "are about conflicts with Supervisors, both for students and for post-docs. A question", "advice from other academics. How can you build a strong and positive relationship", "think. But quite a few new students could benefit from advice from other", "from other academics. How can you build a strong and positive relationship with", "with your supervisor from the first days, even if he/she is aloof or", "or judgmental? NOTE: The question has now been asked on the [main site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/118465/20058).", "broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a suitable place to discuss that and", "too ephemeral for it, I think. But quite a few new students could", "reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a suitable place to discuss", "A question there about how to avoid such conflicts from arising, starting on", "students and for post-docs. A question there about how to avoid such conflicts", "suitable place to discuss that and preserve any advice given? The chatroom is", "your supervisor from the first days, even if he/she is aloof or judgmental?", "I think. But quite a few new students could benefit from advice from", "discuss that and preserve any advice given? The chatroom is too ephemeral for", "Is this a suitable place to discuss that and preserve any advice given?", "benefit from advice from other academics. How can you build a strong and", "chatroom is too ephemeral for it, I think. But quite a few new", "is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question has now been asked on the", "day, would likely be closed for a variety of reasons - broad, opinions,", "a suitable place to discuss that and preserve any advice given? The chatroom", "both for students and for post-docs. A question there about how to avoid", "days, even if he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question has now", "to discuss that and preserve any advice given? The chatroom is too ephemeral", "from the first days, even if he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The", "arising, starting on the first day, would likely be closed for a variety", "Quite a few questions at Academia are about conflicts with Supervisors, both for", "preserve any advice given? The chatroom is too ephemeral for it, I think.", "from advice from other academics. How can you build a strong and positive", "place to discuss that and preserve any advice given? The chatroom is too", "other academics. How can you build a strong and positive relationship with your", "a variety of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a suitable", "supervisor from the first days, even if he/she is aloof or judgmental? NOTE:", "there about how to avoid such conflicts from arising, starting on the first", "advice given? The chatroom is too ephemeral for it, I think. But quite", "quite a few new students could benefit from advice from other academics. How", "of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is this a suitable place to", "build a strong and positive relationship with your supervisor from the first days,", "conflicts with Supervisors, both for students and for post-docs. A question there about", "conflicts from arising, starting on the first day, would likely be closed for", "is too ephemeral for it, I think. But quite a few new students", "academics. How can you build a strong and positive relationship with your supervisor", "could benefit from advice from other academics. How can you build a strong", "But quite a few new students could benefit from advice from other academics.", "post-docs. A question there about how to avoid such conflicts from arising, starting", "How can you build a strong and positive relationship with your supervisor from", "new students could benefit from advice from other academics. How can you build", "relationship with your supervisor from the first days, even if he/she is aloof", "avoid such conflicts from arising, starting on the first day, would likely be", "with Supervisors, both for students and for post-docs. A question there about how", "first day, would likely be closed for a variety of reasons - broad,", "be closed for a variety of reasons - broad, opinions, shopping, etc. Is", "from arising, starting on the first day, would likely be closed for a", "few questions at Academia are about conflicts with Supervisors, both for students and", "this a suitable place to discuss that and preserve any advice given? The", "aloof or judgmental? NOTE: The question has now been asked on the [main" ]
[ "Academia Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a", "a theoretical framework but some lads responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in my", "help me solve my problem. I need some Academics' opinions on the matter", "framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about my methodology for generating a theoretical framework", "question about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework)", "not help me solve my problem. I need some Academics' opinions on the", "solve my problem. I need some Academics' opinions on the matter . best", "irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could not help me solve my problem. I", "a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about my methodology for generating a theoretical", "methodology for generating a theoretical framework but some lads responded by asking some", "some lads responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could not", "me solve my problem. I need some Academics' opinions on the matter .", "[is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about my methodology", "theoretical framework but some lads responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion)", "my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about my methodology for", "by asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could not help me solve", "post: [is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about my", "some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could not help me solve my problem.", "responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could not help me", "for generating a theoretical framework but some lads responded by asking some irrelevant", "that could not help me solve my problem. I need some Academics' opinions", "my opinion) that could not help me solve my problem. I need some", "about my methodology for generating a theoretical framework but some lads responded by", "have a question about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered", "Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question", "asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could not help me solve my", "my Academia Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted", "my methodology for generating a theoretical framework but some lads responded by asking", "but some lads responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could", "a question about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered a", "lads responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that could not help", "I have a question about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet", "I posted a question about my methodology for generating a theoretical framework but", "generating a theoretical framework but some lads responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in", "question about my methodology for generating a theoretical framework but some lads responded", "opinion) that could not help me solve my problem. I need some Academics'", "could not help me solve my problem. I need some Academics' opinions on", "spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about my methodology for generating", "posted a question about my methodology for generating a theoretical framework but some", "my problem. I need some Academics' opinions on the matter . best regards", "questions(in my opinion) that could not help me solve my problem. I need", "about my Academia Stack Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I", "considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about my methodology for generating a", "Exchange post: [is my spreadsheet considered a framework?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118384/is-my-spreadsheet-considered-a-framework) I posted a question about", "framework but some lads responded by asking some irrelevant questions(in my opinion) that", "a question about my methodology for generating a theoretical framework but some lads" ]
[ "just one when referring to advisors? For example, how would you tag a", "using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is to provide", "a question like [How to have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I", "For example, how would you tag a question like [How to have productive", "how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show", "provide supervision (as seems to be noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show", "could reasonably use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions", "tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job", "job is to provide supervision (as seems to be noted in the description", "\"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to how one would use", "with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit to add both tags to", "you pick whether or not to use both or just one when referring", "use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")", "to use both or just one when referring to advisors? For example, how", "example, how would you tag a question like [How to have productive meetings", "use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"),", "tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is to provide supervision (as seems to", "description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether or", "advisor's job is to provide supervision (as seems to be noted in the", "'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is", "questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused", "both or just one when referring to advisors? For example, how would you", "one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions", "\"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether or not to use", "[advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as", "not to use both or just one when referring to advisors? For example,", "clear that you could reasonably use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using", "like [How to have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an", "how would you tag a question like [How to have productive meetings with", "of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether or not", "to have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit to", "tag a question like [How to have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context:", "(as seems to be noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged", "as the advisor's job is to provide supervision (as seems to be noted", "supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit to add both tags to this question.)", "would you tag a question like [How to have productive meetings with Ph.D", "seems to be noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")).", "It's clear that you could reasonably use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without", "'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether or not to use both or just", "whether or not to use both or just one when referring to advisors?", "questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's", "to provide supervision (as seems to be noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision", "would you pick whether or not to use both or just one when", "question like [How to have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted", "without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to how", "using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to how one", "is to provide supervision (as seems to be noted in the description of", "or just one when referring to advisors? For example, how would you tag", "that you could reasonably use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor", "noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you", "the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether", "supervision (as seems to be noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions", "\"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the", "advisors? For example, how would you tag a question like [How to have", "How would you pick whether or not to use both or just one", "would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged", "\"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm", "questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether or not to use both", "I'm confused as to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\")", "[How to have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit", "to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision", "be noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would", "but I'm confused as to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged", "to be noted in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How", "questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor", "'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to", "meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit to add both tags", "tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether or not to use both or", "[supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but", "'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions", "in the description of [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick", "as to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without using", "pick whether or not to use both or just one when referring to", "you tag a question like [How to have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)?", "productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit to add both", "[supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\")). How would you pick whether or not to", "[advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to how one would", "\"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is to provide supervision (as", "'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is to provide supervision (as seems to be", "Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit to add both tags to this", "one when referring to advisors? For example, how would you tag a question", "the advisor's job is to provide supervision (as seems to be noted in", "tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as", "without using [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is to", "reasonably use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged", "you could reasonably use [supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") without using [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show", "confused as to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show questions tagged 'advisor'\") without", "questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is to provide supervision (as seems", "or not to use both or just one when referring to advisors? For", "referring to advisors? For example, how would you tag a question like [How", "have productive meetings with Ph.D supervisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103261/how-to-have-productive-meetings-with-ph-d-supervisor)? (Context: I submitted an edit to add", "tagged 'advisor'\"), but I'm confused as to how one would use [advisor](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/advisor \"show", "[supervision](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/supervision \"show questions tagged 'supervision'\") as the advisor's job is to provide supervision", "to advisors? For example, how would you tag a question like [How to", "use both or just one when referring to advisors? For example, how would", "when referring to advisors? For example, how would you tag a question like" ]
[ "related, but not identical* questions. For this reason, I believe that an answer", "be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down voters) object if an answer is", "the purpose of this site goes beyond just helping the person who posed", "the site is perceived, which affects the kinds of questions and answers that", "while the down votes don't disturb me, I wonder if some clarification of", "entirely inappropriate. I can, of course, stop writing such things, but I think", "my answer is clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact,", "wonder if some clarification of the purpose of an answer and of this", "I believe that an answer that isn't directed at the OP, but gives", "and while the down votes don't disturb me, I wonder if some clarification", "this reason, I believe that an answer that isn't directed at the OP,", "general answer may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down voters) object if", "to me, however, that this site wants to be (claims to be, actually)", "is clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact, I wasn't", "necessarily the OP who asked the question and therefore a general answer may", "directing it at the OP, as tried to say so in the post.", "orthogonal to the question. I write such answers quite often, and while the", "belief is that the purpose of this site goes beyond just helping the", "a reputation issue, for me, but rather one about how the site is", "stop writing such things, but I think it would do damage to the", "questions. For this reason, I believe that an answer that isn't directed at", "or even orthogonal to the question. I write such answers quite often, and", "may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down voters) object if an answer", "some administration, then in the future a person who has some control over", "horizon\" posts as such, but not always. But a lot of readers, even", "this site generally would be useful. My belief is that the purpose of", "directly address the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I can, of course, stop", "just helping the person who posed a question. For that, any simple mailing", "reputation issue, for me, but rather one about how the site is perceived,", "I wonder if some clarification of the purpose of an answer and of", "overall. I wonder what the community consensus is on this issue. It isn't", "is perceived, which affects the kinds of questions and answers that will be", "don't disturb me, I wonder if some clarification of the purpose of an", "the site overall. I wonder what the community consensus is on this issue.", "the post. Some commenters, however, seem to think that such answers that don't", "are entirely inappropriate. I can, of course, stop writing such things, but I", "seem to think that such answers that don't directly address the OP's needs", "but not identical* questions. For this reason, I believe that an answer that", "post. Some commenters, however, seem to think that such answers that don't directly", "some control over changing administrative policies might read a thread and use it", "that an answer that isn't directed at the OP, but gives background information", "who may have related, but not identical questions. For this reason, I believe", "I sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as such, but not always.", "answer that isn't directed at the OP, but gives background information and guidance", "who has some control over changing administrative policies might read a thread and", "seems to me, however, that this site wants to be (claims to be,", "question and therefore a general answer may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and", "site is perceived, which affects the kinds of questions and answers that will", "about how the site is perceived, which affects the kinds of questions and", "Background: Some commenters (and down voters) object if an answer is much more", "an answer is much more general than the question calls for or even", "affects the kinds of questions and answers that will be given. If it", "believe that an answer that isn't directed at the OP, but gives background", "would be sufficient. It seems to me, however, that this site wants to", "in the future a person who has some control over changing administrative policies", "however, seem to think that such answers that don't directly address the OP's", "post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond the", "long time and have accumulated quite a lot of rep, seem to object", "of an answer isn't necessarily the OP who asked the question and therefore", "[this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond", "it would do damage to the site overall. I wonder what the community", "if some clarification of the purpose of an answer and of this site", "and therefore a general answer may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down", "For that, any simple mailing list would be sufficient. It seems to me,", "been here a long time and have accumulated quite a lot of rep,", "but gives background information and guidance to others is entirely appropriate. In particular,", "is entirely appropriate. In particular, If a student has some particular issue in", "necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as", "I wasn't directing it at the OP, as tried to say so in", "answers won't really give the necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes label my", "wonder what the community consensus is on this issue. It isn't a reputation", "isn't directed at the OP, but gives background information and guidance to others", "that such answers that don't directly address the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate.", "beyond the horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing it at the OP, as", "and answers that will be given. If it is only narrowly viewed, then", "be useful. My belief is that the purpose of this site goes beyond", "in dealing with some administration, then in the future a person who has", "OP, as tried to say so in the post. Some commenters, however, seem", "much more general than the question calls for or even orthogonal to the", "who visit in the future and who may have related, but not identical", "clarification of the purpose of an answer and of this site generally would", "of course, stop writing such things, but I think it would do damage", "reason, I believe that an answer that isn't directed at the OP, but", "of the purpose of an answer and of this site generally would be", "people who visit in the future and who may have related, but not", "mailing list would be sufficient. It seems to me, however, that this site", "gives background information and guidance to others is entirely appropriate. In particular, If", "needs are entirely inappropriate. I can, of course, stop writing such things, but", "but not always. But a lot of readers, even some who have been", "some who have been here a long time and have accumulated quite a", "calls for or even orthogonal to the question. I write such answers quite", "answer and of this site generally would be useful. My belief is that", "seem to object to such things. As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for", "and use it to design a better system. Having too-narrow answers won't really", "a lot of readers, even some who have been here a long time", "such things, but I think it would do damage to the site overall.", "If it is only narrowly viewed, then it will be less useful IMO", "fact, I wasn't directing it at the OP, as tried to say so", "therefore a general answer may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down voters)", "down voters) object if an answer is much more general than the question", "OP who asked the question and therefore a general answer may be appropriate.", "don't directly* address the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I can, of course,", "I write such answers quite often, and while the down votes don't disturb", "to design a better system. Having too-narrow answers won't really give the necessary", "answers that will be given. If it is only narrowly viewed, then it", "a student has some particular issue in dealing with some administration, then in", "thread and use it to design a better system. Having too-narrow answers won't", "of this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing it", "something more, giving guidance to people who visit in the future and who", "an answer that isn't directed at the OP, but gives background information and", "such, but not always. But a lot of readers, even some who have", "think that such answers that don't directly* address the OP's needs are entirely", "that isn't directed at the OP, but gives background information and guidance to", "do damage to the site overall. I wonder what the community consensus is", "identical* questions. For this reason, I believe that an answer that isn't directed", "object to such things. As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my", "things, but I think it would do damage to the site overall. I", "here a long time and have accumulated quite a lot of rep, seem", "a lot of rep, seem to object to such things. As an example,", "consensus is on this issue. It isn't a reputation issue, for me, but", "so in the post. Some commenters, however, seem to think that such answers", "(and down voters) object if an answer is much more general than the", "my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as such, but not always. But a lot", "really give the necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes label my \"beyond the", "list would be sufficient. It seems to me, however, that this site wants", "wasn't directing it at the OP, as tried to say so in the", "not identical* questions. For this reason, I believe that an answer that isn't", "posts as such, but not always. But a lot of readers, even some", "that the purpose of this site goes beyond just helping the person who", "of this site generally would be useful. My belief is that the purpose", "on this issue. It isn't a reputation issue, for me, but rather one", "and who may have related, but not identical questions. For this reason, I", "dealing with some administration, then in the future a person who has some", "even orthogonal to the question. I write such answers quite often, and while", "such answers quite often, and while the down votes don't disturb me, I", "question calls for or even orthogonal to the question. I write such answers", "if an answer is much more general than the question calls for or", "goes beyond just helping the person who posed a question. For that, any", "the horizon\" posts as such, but not always. But a lot of readers,", "background information and guidance to others is entirely appropriate. In particular, If a", "who asked the question and therefore a general answer may be appropriate. Background:", "lot of rep, seem to object to such things. As an example, see", "have related, but not identical* questions. For this reason, I believe that an", "is much more general than the question calls for or even orthogonal to", "be (claims to be, actually) something more, giving guidance to people who visit", "which my answer is clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In", "how the site is perceived, which affects the kinds of questions and answers", "information and guidance to others is entirely appropriate. In particular, If a student", "that will be given. If it is only narrowly viewed, then it will", "answer is much more general than the question calls for or even orthogonal", "design a better system. Having too-narrow answers won't really give the necessary guidance,", "such things. As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is", "votes don't disturb me, I wonder if some clarification of the purpose of", "horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing it at the OP, as tried to", "visit in the future and who may have related, but not identical questions.", "quite often, and while the down votes don't disturb me, I wonder if", "writing such things, but I think it would do damage to the site", "site goes beyond just helping the person who posed a question. For that,", "however, that this site wants to be (claims to be, actually) something more,", "things. As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is clearly", "which affects the kinds of questions and answers that will be given. If", "of questions and answers that will be given. If it is only narrowly", "always. But a lot of readers, even some who have been here a", "and have accumulated quite a lot of rep, seem to object to such", "for me, but rather one about how the site is perceived, which affects", "me, however, that this site wants to be (claims to be, actually) something", "purpose of an answer and of this site generally would be useful. My", "For this reason, I believe that an answer that isn't directed at the", "lot of readers, even some who have been here a long time and", "Proposition: The targeted reader of an answer isn't necessarily the OP who asked", "some clarification of the purpose of an answer and of this site generally", "more general than the question calls for or even orthogonal to the question.", "to the question. I write such answers quite often, and while the down", "In particular, If a student has some particular issue in dealing with some", "over changing administrative policies might read a thread and use it to design", "may have related, but not identical* questions. For this reason, I believe that", "I think it would do damage to the site overall. I wonder what", "and of this site generally would be useful. My belief is that the", "a question. For that, any simple mailing list would be sufficient. It seems", "example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is clearly of this sort.", "me, I wonder if some clarification of the purpose of an answer and", "clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing", "address the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I can, of course, stop writing", "would do damage to the site overall. I wonder what the community consensus", "be sufficient. It seems to me, however, that this site wants to be", "read a thread and use it to design a better system. Having too-narrow", "to object to such things. As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which", "the future a person who has some control over changing administrative policies might", "it to design a better system. Having too-narrow answers won't really give the", "guidance to people who visit in the future and who may have related,", "for which my answer is clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon.", "the horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing it at the OP, as tried", "to people who visit in the future and who may have related, but", "purpose of this site goes beyond just helping the person who posed a", "Having too-narrow answers won't really give the necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes", "than the question calls for or even orthogonal to the question. I write", "the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I can, of course, stop writing such", "will be given. If it is only narrowly viewed, then it will be", "has some control over changing administrative policies might read a thread and use", "some particular issue in dealing with some administration, then in the future a", "damage to the site overall. I wonder what the community consensus is on", "course, stop writing such things, but I think it would do damage to", "be, actually) something more, giving guidance to people who visit in the future", "it is only narrowly viewed, then it will be less useful IMO than", "beyond just helping the person who posed a question. For that, any simple", "appropriate. In particular, If a student has some particular issue in dealing with", "think it would do damage to the site overall. I wonder what the", "site generally would be useful. My belief is that the purpose of this", "the OP, but gives background information and guidance to others is entirely appropriate.", "this issue. It isn't a reputation issue, for me, but rather one about", "the OP, as tried to say so in the post. Some commenters, however,", "site wants to be (claims to be, actually) something more, giving guidance to", "administration, then in the future a person who has some control over changing", "the necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts", "kinds of questions and answers that will be given. If it is only", "person who has some control over changing administrative policies might read a thread", "accumulated quite a lot of rep, seem to object to such things. As", "for or even orthogonal to the question. I write such answers quite often,", "If a student has some particular issue in dealing with some administration, then", "particular issue in dealing with some administration, then in the future a person", "use it to design a better system. Having too-narrow answers won't really give", "then in the future a person who has some control over changing administrative", "but I think it would do damage to the site overall. I wonder", "that this site wants to be (claims to be, actually) something more, giving", "policies might read a thread and use it to design a better system.", "in the post. Some commenters, however, seem to think that such answers that", "perceived, which affects the kinds of questions and answers that will be given.", "useful. My belief is that the purpose of this site goes beyond just", "answer isn't necessarily the OP who asked the question and therefore a general", "helping the person who posed a question. For that, any simple mailing list", "to others is entirely appropriate. In particular, If a student has some particular", "the person who posed a question. For that, any simple mailing list would", "In fact, I wasn't directing it at the OP, as tried to say", "But a lot of readers, even some who have been here a long", "system. Having too-narrow answers won't really give the necessary guidance, I think. I", "of readers, even some who have been here a long time and have", "commenters (and down voters) object if an answer is much more general than", "often, and while the down votes don't disturb me, I wonder if some", "can, of course, stop writing such things, but I think it would do", "an answer isn't necessarily the OP who asked the question and therefore a", "The targeted reader of an answer isn't necessarily the OP who asked the", "given. If it is only narrowly viewed, then it will be less useful", "a thread and use it to design a better system. Having too-narrow answers", "have been here a long time and have accumulated quite a lot of", "I think. I sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as such, but", "as tried to say so in the post. Some commenters, however, seem to", "say so in the post. Some commenters, however, seem to think that such", "in the future and who may have related, but not identical questions. For", "entirely appropriate. In particular, If a student has some particular issue in dealing", "but rather one about how the site is perceived, which affects the kinds", "write such answers quite often, and while the down votes don't disturb me,", "a general answer may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down voters) object", "answer is clearly of this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact, I", "student has some particular issue in dealing with some administration, then in the", "a long time and have accumulated quite a lot of rep, seem to", "of this site goes beyond just helping the person who posed a question.", "simple mailing list would be sufficient. It seems to me, however, that this", "of an answer and of this site generally would be useful. My belief", "to be (claims to be, actually) something more, giving guidance to people who", "future a person who has some control over changing administrative policies might read", "appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down voters) object if an answer is much", "see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is clearly of this sort. Clearly", "a person who has some control over changing administrative policies might read a", "to the site overall. I wonder what the community consensus is on this", "changing administrative policies might read a thread and use it to design a", "control over changing administrative policies might read a thread and use it to", "rather one about how the site is perceived, which affects the kinds of", "Some commenters, however, seem to think that such answers that don't directly address", "what the community consensus is on this issue. It isn't a reputation issue,", "questions and answers that will be given. If it is only narrowly viewed,", "quite a lot of rep, seem to object to such things. As an", "is on this issue. It isn't a reputation issue, for me, but rather", "voters) object if an answer is much more general than the question calls", "issue, for me, but rather one about how the site is perceived, which", "giving guidance to people who visit in the future and who may have", "OP, but gives background information and guidance to others is entirely appropriate. In", "readers, even some who have been here a long time and have accumulated", "directed at the OP, but gives background information and guidance to others is", "site overall. I wonder what the community consensus is on this issue. It", "I wonder what the community consensus is on this issue. It isn't a", "an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is clearly of this", "future and who may have related, but not identical* questions. For this reason,", "(claims to be, actually) something more, giving guidance to people who visit in", "such answers that don't directly address the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I", "disturb me, I wonder if some clarification of the purpose of an answer", "My belief is that the purpose of this site goes beyond just helping", "isn't necessarily the OP who asked the question and therefore a general answer", "have accumulated quite a lot of rep, seem to object to such things.", "It seems to me, however, that this site wants to be (claims to", "the down votes don't disturb me, I wonder if some clarification of the", "sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as such, but not always. But", "rep, seem to object to such things. As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966),", "\"beyond the horizon\" posts as such, but not always. But a lot of", "answers quite often, and while the down votes don't disturb me, I wonder", "a better system. Having too-narrow answers won't really give the necessary guidance, I", "an answer and of this site generally would be useful. My belief is", "Some commenters (and down voters) object if an answer is much more general", "is only narrowly viewed, then it will be less useful IMO than otherwise.", "issue. It isn't a reputation issue, for me, but rather one about how", "issue in dealing with some administration, then in the future a person who", "the OP who asked the question and therefore a general answer may be", "sufficient. It seems to me, however, that this site wants to be (claims", "that don't directly address the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I can, of", "person who posed a question. For that, any simple mailing list would be", "general than the question calls for or even orthogonal to the question. I", "OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I can, of course, stop writing such things,", "be given. If it is only narrowly viewed, then it will be less", "question. I write such answers quite often, and while the down votes don't", "the question calls for or even orthogonal to the question. I write such", "one about how the site is perceived, which affects the kinds of questions", "of rep, seem to object to such things. As an example, see [this", "label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as such, but not always. But a", "might read a thread and use it to design a better system. Having", "asked the question and therefore a general answer may be appropriate. Background: Some", "who have been here a long time and have accumulated quite a lot", "guidance to others is entirely appropriate. In particular, If a student has some", "wants to be (claims to be, actually) something more, giving guidance to people", "that, any simple mailing list would be sufficient. It seems to me, however,", "at the OP, as tried to say so in the post. Some commenters,", "even some who have been here a long time and have accumulated quite", "to be, actually) something more, giving guidance to people who visit in the", "the future and who may have related, but not identical questions. For this", "this sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing it at", "inappropriate. I can, of course, stop writing such things, but I think it", "won't really give the necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes label my \"beyond", "has some particular issue in dealing with some administration, then in the future", "to such things. As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer", "reader of an answer isn't necessarily the OP who asked the question and", "at the OP, but gives background information and guidance to others is entirely", "answers that don't directly address the OP's needs are entirely inappropriate. I can,", "answer may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters (and down voters) object if an", "object if an answer is much more general than the question calls for", "who posed a question. For that, any simple mailing list would be sufficient.", "this site goes beyond just helping the person who posed a question. For", "the kinds of questions and answers that will be given. If it is", "the question. I write such answers quite often, and while the down votes", "not always. But a lot of readers, even some who have been here", "more, giving guidance to people who visit in the future and who may", "give the necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\"", "I can, of course, stop writing such things, but I think it would", "guidance, I think. I sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as such,", "me, but rather one about how the site is perceived, which affects the", "others is entirely appropriate. In particular, If a student has some particular issue", "actually) something more, giving guidance to people who visit in the future and", "this site wants to be (claims to be, actually) something more, giving guidance", "it at the OP, as tried to say so in the post. Some", "to think that such answers that don't directly* address the OP's needs are", "time and have accumulated quite a lot of rep, seem to object to", "with some administration, then in the future a person who has some control", "too-narrow answers won't really give the necessary guidance, I think. I sometimes label", "the community consensus is on this issue. It isn't a reputation issue, for", "sort. Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing it at the", "particular, If a student has some particular issue in dealing with some administration,", "tried to say so in the post. Some commenters, however, seem to think", "any simple mailing list would be sufficient. It seems to me, however, that", "administrative policies might read a thread and use it to design a better", "the question and therefore a general answer may be appropriate. Background: Some commenters", "isn't a reputation issue, for me, but rather one about how the site", "better system. Having too-narrow answers won't really give the necessary guidance, I think.", "It isn't a reputation issue, for me, but rather one about how the", "question. For that, any simple mailing list would be sufficient. It seems to", "as such, but not always. But a lot of readers, even some who", "down votes don't disturb me, I wonder if some clarification of the purpose", "the purpose of an answer and of this site generally would be useful.", "commenters, however, seem to think that such answers that don't directly address the", "to say so in the post. Some commenters, however, seem to think that", "is that the purpose of this site goes beyond just helping the person", "posed a question. For that, any simple mailing list would be sufficient. It", "think. I sometimes label my \"beyond the horizon\" posts as such, but not", "Clearly beyond the horizon. In fact, I wasn't directing it at the OP,", "community consensus is on this issue. It isn't a reputation issue, for me,", "would be useful. My belief is that the purpose of this site goes", "targeted reader of an answer isn't necessarily the OP who asked the question", "and guidance to others is entirely appropriate. In particular, If a student has", "As an example, see [this post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119962/what-can-be-done-about-a-disruptive-classmate/119966#119966), for which my answer is clearly of", "generally would be useful. My belief is that the purpose of this site" ]
[ "conclusion here is that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\")", "that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a lot of educational research, which is", "me to think about the idea of reproducible-research and what the concept means.", "the reader can examine the code to determine whether it is, indeed, the", "wrong. In a study carried out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the study", "answer the research question. That is definitely a plus, but I'll suggest below", "Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become obvious that quite a lot of", "learn more, of course, if you know the standards and techniques by which", "data it applies to only that set of data, rather than the larger", "data so that others can run that code on that data to assure", "researcher has revealed enough that a reader can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable", "data itself. If a technique works for only a single set of data", "questions that relate to this deeper concern. To do this, a researcher would", "to quantify the potential that our conclusions are wrong. In a study carried", "result, but a different set, gathered to the same standards, gives an opposing", "enough information (which they probably don't), but because taking the same research questions", "term I would prefer for this would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These", "same results. Of course, it has an additional benefit, in that the reader", "identical data. -- I may need to edit this or append to it.", "and trying to answer them independently with different models, techniques, and data, leads", "But transparent-research seems to cover the current concept better. The More Important Problem:", "indeed, the appropriate code to answer the research question. That is definitely a", "only some fields, such as computer science. The idea is that researchers should", "proper answer for deep questions. You learn more, of course, if you know", "so can't use identical methods on identical data. -- I may need to", "probably don't), but because taking the same research questions and trying to answer", "design in some sciences it seems to go deeper than that. Unfortunately this", "used for a fairly simple idea that is applicable to (I'm afraid) only", "code on the same data - get the same results. Of course, it", "author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both of these are valuable, of course,", "simple idea that is applicable to (I'm afraid) only some fields, such as", "gathered to the same standards, gives an opposing result, you have learned almost", "in some sciences it seems to go deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad", "a better term would be preferable, so as to make an important distinction.", "But you don't know which time, unless you reproduce the study independently many", "research question. That is definitely a plus, but I'll suggest below that we", "concept isn't quite so good about the data, I think. Having a fixed", "possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent simply means that the", "of course, if you know the standards and techniques by which the data", "that the researcher has revealed enough that a reader can follow the reasoning", "data was gathered. If using one set of data gives one result, but", "of the truth, not (as in mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical techniques", "concern. To do this, a researcher would need to reveal more, so that", "party has enough information to attack the same research question, perhaps in a", "1% of the time. But you don't know which time, unless you reproduce", "be independent, and so can't use identical methods on identical data. -- I", "researchers should publish their code and data so that others can run that", "prefer that reproducible-research as a term be reserved for questions that relate to", "as to the actual scientific truth, not just the appropriateness of the methodology", "research question, perhaps in a different way, but get better evidence as to", "collected (search terms for some sorts of data) than the specific data itself.", "second idea above (fixed data set), but it is misnamed as it is", "the term is used for a fairly simple idea that is applicable to", "data to assure that the original authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the", "about the data, I think. Having a fixed data set only partially helps", "common to use this term, that a better term would be preferable, so", "But the replications of the study need to be independent, and so can't", "techniques in particular work to quantify the potential that our conclusions are wrong.", "In a study carried out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the study (properly)", "can demonstrate that the author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both of these", "the time. But you don't know which time, unless you reproduce the study", "mis-named. It is weak because of the second idea above (fixed data set),", "of course, so my concern is with the naming, not the validity of", "as a term be reserved for questions that relate to this deeper concern.", "can be due to flaws of statistical design in some sciences it seems", "is that researchers should publish their code and data so that others can", "deep questions. You learn more, of course, if you know the standards and", "as it is not adequate to answer a more important question. But transparent-research", "become obvious that quite a lot of published research in the sciences can't", "deeper concern. To do this, a researcher would need to reveal more, so", "the same research question, perhaps in a different way, but get better evidence", "larger question for which the data was gathered. If using one set of", "the data was gathered. If using one set of data gives one result,", "set of data, rather than the larger question for which the data was", "one can demonstrate that the author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both of", "Recently it has become obvious that quite a lot of published research in", "research questions and trying to answer them independently with different models, techniques, and", "term, that a better term would be preferable, so as to make an", "a different way, but get better evidence as to the actual scientific truth,", "the larger question for which the data was gathered. If using one set", "the study need to be independent, and so can't use identical methods on", "set of data it applies to only that set of data, rather than", "has an additional benefit, in that the reader can examine the code to", "think. Having a fixed data set only partially helps us come to the", "which the data was collected (search terms for some sorts of data) than", "for some sorts of data) than the specific data itself. If a technique", "scientific truth, not just the appropriateness of the methodology originally used. Why It", "the standards and techniques by which the data was collected (search terms for", "is with the naming, not the validity of the underlying idea. Background: -----------", "the proper answer for deep questions. You learn more, of course, if you", "the sciences can't be validated, not because the author doesn't publish enough information", "us come to the proper answer for deep questions. You learn more, of", "heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research as a term be reserved for questions", "same research question, perhaps in a different way, but get better evidence as", "different set, gathered to the same standards, gives an opposing result, you have", "be fairly common to use this term, that a better term would be", "learned almost nothing. My conclusion here is that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research", "hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both of these are valuable, of course, so", "answer a more important question. But transparent-research seems to cover the current concept", "a fixed data set only partially helps us come to the proper answer", "--------------- In the sciences we seek truth not just results. Often truth is", "specific data itself. If a technique works for only a single set of", "just the appropriateness of the methodology originally used. Why It Matters: --------------- In", "course, so my concern is with the naming, not the validity of the", "for only a single set of data it applies to only that set", "the concept means. I think that, while it may be fairly common to", "If using one set of data gives one result, but a different set,", "an opposing result, you have learned almost nothing. My conclusion here is that", "are wrong. In a study carried out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the", "a single set of data it applies to only that set of data,", "has become obvious that quite a lot of published research in the sciences", "itself. If a technique works for only a single set of data it", "this would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same, actually.", "conclusion. Both of these are valuable, of course, so my concern is with", "a plus, but I'll suggest below that we need more. The current concept", "for a fairly simple idea that is applicable to (I'm afraid) only some", "come to the proper answer for deep questions. You learn more, of course,", "mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical techniques in particular work to quantify the", "dear to my heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research as a term be", "in particular work to quantify the potential that our conclusions are wrong. In", "can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one can demonstrate that the", "the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one can demonstrate that the author hasn't", "aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent simply means that the researcher has revealed", "with different models, techniques, and data, leads to contrary results. While this can", "more, of course, if you know the standards and techniques by which the", "question. But transparent-research seems to cover the current concept better. The More Important", "idea of reproducible-research and what the concept means. I think that, while it", "go deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a lot of educational", "on that data to assure that the original authors aren't misrepresenting their results.", "be validated, not because the author doesn't publish enough information (which they probably", "misrepresenting their results. Run the same code on the same data - get", "idea that is applicable to (I'm afraid) only some fields, such as computer", "not because the author doesn't publish enough information (which they probably don't), but", "our conclusions are wrong. In a study carried out (properly) with 99% confidence,", "of data it applies to only that set of data, rather than the", "quite a lot of published research in the sciences can't be validated, not", "Currently, it seems that the term is used for a fairly simple idea", "[reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak and mis-named. It", "examine the code to determine whether it is, indeed, the appropriate code to", "we need more. The current concept isn't quite so good about the data,", "was gathered. If using one set of data gives one result, but a", "of statistical design in some sciences it seems to go deeper than that.", "that reproducible-research as a term be reserved for questions that relate to this", "would prefer for this would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite", "doesn't publish enough information (which they probably don't), but because taking the same", "we often use techniques that give us evidence of the truth, not (as", "was collected (search terms for some sorts of data) than the specific data", "their code and data so that others can run that code on that", "a study carried out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the study (properly) will", "The term I would prefer for this would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research.", "To do this, a researcher would need to reveal more, so that an", "the research question. That is definitely a plus, but I'll suggest below that", "means that one can demonstrate that the author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion.", "plus, but I'll suggest below that we need more. The current concept isn't", "different models, techniques, and data, leads to contrary results. While this can be", "be preferable, so as to make an important distinction. The term I would", "such as computer science. The idea is that researchers should publish their code", "question. That is definitely a plus, but I'll suggest below that we need", "in a different way, but get better evidence as to the actual scientific", "techniques, and data, leads to contrary results. While this can be due to", "additional benefit, in that the reader can examine the code to determine whether", "it is, indeed, the appropriate code to answer the research question. That is", "here is that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is", "the sciences we seek truth not just results. Often truth is evasive or", "think about the idea of reproducible-research and what the concept means. I think", "make an important distinction. The term I would prefer for this would be", "partially helps us come to the proper answer for deep questions. You learn", "prefer for this would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the", "more. The current concept isn't quite so good about the data, I think.", "models, techniques, and data, leads to contrary results. While this can be due", "(properly) will yield an improper result 1% of the time. But you don't", "it applies to only that set of data, rather than the larger question", "has revealed enough that a reader can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means", "conclusions are wrong. In a study carried out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating", "you reproduce the study independently many times. But the replications of the study", "to the same standards, gives an opposing result, you have learned almost nothing.", "course, it has an additional benefit, in that the reader can examine the", "it is not adequate to answer a more important question. But transparent-research seems", "a more important question. But transparent-research seems to cover the current concept better.", "but a different set, gathered to the same standards, gives an opposing result,", "the same standards, gives an opposing result, you have learned almost nothing. My", "to think about the idea of reproducible-research and what the concept means. I", "lot of published research in the sciences can't be validated, not because the", "(I'm afraid) only some fields, such as computer science. The idea is that", "current concept better. The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become obvious", "question has caused me to think about the idea of reproducible-research and what", "while it may be fairly common to use this term, that a better", "useful, it is weak and mis-named. It is weak because of the second", "research in the sciences can't be validated, not because the author doesn't publish", "than that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a lot of educational research, which", "the truth, not (as in mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical techniques in", "information (which they probably don't), but because taking the same research questions and", "science. The idea is that researchers should publish their code and data so", "and mis-named. It is weak because of the second idea above (fixed data", "be due to flaws of statistical design in some sciences it seems to", "gives one result, but a different set, gathered to the same standards, gives", "due to flaws of statistical design in some sciences it seems to go", "their results. Run the same code on the same data - get the", "idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak and", "to the proper answer for deep questions. You learn more, of course, if", "for deep questions. You learn more, of course, if you know the standards", "better term would be preferable, so as to make an important distinction. The", "be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent simply", "so that others can run that code on that data to assure that", "the validity of the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that the", "replications of the study need to be independent, and so can't use identical", "with the naming, not the validity of the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently,", "data - get the same results. Of course, it has an additional benefit,", "- get the same results. Of course, it has an additional benefit, in", "the study independently many times. But the replications of the study need to", "methods on identical data. -- I may need to edit this or append", "researcher would need to reveal more, so that an independent party has enough", "result 1% of the time. But you don't know which time, unless you", "(search terms for some sorts of data) than the specific data itself. If", "some sciences it seems to go deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad situation", "in the sciences can't be validated, not because the author doesn't publish enough", "same code on the same data - get the same results. Of course,", "to reveal more, so that an independent party has enough information to attack", "them independently with different models, techniques, and data, leads to contrary results. While", "information to attack the same research question, perhaps in a different way, but", "I would prefer that reproducible-research as a term be reserved for questions that", "some sorts of data) than the specific data itself. If a technique works", "better. The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become obvious that quite", "sciences can't be validated, not because the author doesn't publish enough information (which", "transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent simply means", "is not adequate to answer a more important question. But transparent-research seems to", "reveal more, so that an independent party has enough information to attack the", "I think that, while it may be fairly common to use this term,", "originally used. Why It Matters: --------------- In the sciences we seek truth not", "to achieve definitively, so we often use techniques that give us evidence of", "would prefer that reproducible-research as a term be reserved for questions that relate", "statistical design in some sciences it seems to go deeper than that. Unfortunately", "standards and techniques by which the data was collected (search terms for some", "results. While this can be due to flaws of statistical design in some", "original authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the same code on the same", "you have learned almost nothing. My conclusion here is that the current idea", "of the second idea above (fixed data set), but it is misnamed as", "truth is evasive or impossible to achieve definitively, so we often use techniques", "sad situation pervades a lot of educational research, which is dear to my", "what the concept means. I think that, while it may be fairly common", "gathered. If using one set of data gives one result, but a different", "questions. You learn more, of course, if you know the standards and techniques", "recent question has caused me to think about the idea of reproducible-research and", "use this term, that a better term would be preferable, so as to", "A recent question has caused me to think about the idea of reproducible-research", "that one can demonstrate that the author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both", "(which they probably don't), but because taking the same research questions and trying", "would be preferable, so as to make an important distinction. The term I", "code and data so that others can run that code on that data", "to answer the research question. That is definitely a plus, but I'll suggest", "important distinction. The term I would prefer for this would be transparent-research or", "tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak and mis-named. It is weak because", "the naming, not the validity of the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it", "valuable, of course, so my concern is with the naming, not the validity", "that set of data, rather than the larger question for which the data", "situation pervades a lot of educational research, which is dear to my heart.", "using one set of data gives one result, but a different set, gathered", "so good about the data, I think. Having a fixed data set only", "taking the same research questions and trying to answer them independently with different", "idea above (fixed data set), but it is misnamed as it is not", "Having a fixed data set only partially helps us come to the proper", "enough that a reader can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one", "should publish their code and data so that others can run that code", "is definitely a plus, but I'll suggest below that we need more. The", "publish their code and data so that others can run that code on", "get better evidence as to the actual scientific truth, not just the appropriateness", "this term, that a better term would be preferable, so as to make", "a technique works for only a single set of data it applies to", "a lot of educational research, which is dear to my heart. I would", "that is applicable to (I'm afraid) only some fields, such as computer science.", "the data was collected (search terms for some sorts of data) than the", "a term be reserved for questions that relate to this deeper concern. To", "term would be preferable, so as to make an important distinction. The term", "concern is with the naming, not the validity of the underlying idea. Background:", "and data so that others can run that code on that data to", "this, a researcher would need to reveal more, so that an independent party", "to be independent, and so can't use identical methods on identical data. --", "often use techniques that give us evidence of the truth, not (as in", "these are valuable, of course, so my concern is with the naming, not", "determine whether it is, indeed, the appropriate code to answer the research question.", "set of data gives one result, but a different set, gathered to the", "in presenting conclusion. Both of these are valuable, of course, so my concern", "but I'll suggest below that we need more. The current concept isn't quite", "the author doesn't publish enough information (which they probably don't), but because taking", "(fixed data set), but it is misnamed as it is not adequate to", "a researcher would need to reveal more, so that an independent party has", "data gives one result, but a different set, gathered to the same standards,", "identical methods on identical data. -- I may need to edit this or", "only a single set of data it applies to only that set of", "'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak and mis-named. It is weak because of", "of data gives one result, but a different set, gathered to the same", "to attack the same research question, perhaps in a different way, but get", "of the study need to be independent, and so can't use identical methods", "so that an independent party has enough information to attack the same research", "the idea of reproducible-research and what the concept means. I think that, while", "use identical methods on identical data. -- I may need to edit this", "that our conclusions are wrong. In a study carried out (properly) with 99%", "or impossible to achieve definitively, so we often use techniques that give us", "and what the concept means. I think that, while it may be fairly", "to assure that the original authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the same", "achieve definitively, so we often use techniques that give us evidence of the", "quite the same, actually. Transparent simply means that the researcher has revealed enough", "be reserved for questions that relate to this deeper concern. To do this,", "to (I'm afraid) only some fields, such as computer science. The idea is", "is applicable to (I'm afraid) only some fields, such as computer science. The", "pervades a lot of educational research, which is dear to my heart. I", "methodology originally used. Why It Matters: --------------- In the sciences we seek truth", "applicable to (I'm afraid) only some fields, such as computer science. The idea", "for which the data was gathered. If using one set of data gives", "for this would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same,", "the researcher has revealed enough that a reader can follow the reasoning completely.", "afraid) only some fields, such as computer science. The idea is that researchers", "I'll suggest below that we need more. The current concept isn't quite so", "to the actual scientific truth, not just the appropriateness of the methodology originally", "that give us evidence of the truth, not (as in mathematics) proof of", "weak because of the second idea above (fixed data set), but it is", "definitively, so we often use techniques that give us evidence of the truth,", "but it is misnamed as it is not adequate to answer a more", "actually. Transparent simply means that the researcher has revealed enough that a reader", "get the same results. Of course, it has an additional benefit, in that", "study independently many times. But the replications of the study need to be", "----------- Currently, it seems that the term is used for a fairly simple", "code to answer the research question. That is definitely a plus, but I'll", "transparent-research seems to cover the current concept better. The More Important Problem: ---------------------------", "different way, but get better evidence as to the actual scientific truth, not", "it seems that the term is used for a fairly simple idea that", "flaws of statistical design in some sciences it seems to go deeper than", "which the data was gathered. If using one set of data gives one", "to answer a more important question. But transparent-research seems to cover the current", "the same, actually. Transparent simply means that the researcher has revealed enough that", "adequate to answer a more important question. But transparent-research seems to cover the", "that the reader can examine the code to determine whether it is, indeed,", "the same data - get the same results. Of course, it has an", "study carried out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the study (properly) will yield", "course, if you know the standards and techniques by which the data was", "just results. Often truth is evasive or impossible to achieve definitively, so we", "My conclusion here is that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged", "is useful, it is weak and mis-named. It is weak because of the", "potential that our conclusions are wrong. In a study carried out (properly) with", "of data) than the specific data itself. If a technique works for only", "don't), but because taking the same research questions and trying to answer them", "reader can examine the code to determine whether it is, indeed, the appropriate", "terms for some sorts of data) than the specific data itself. If a", "enough information to attack the same research question, perhaps in a different way,", "result, you have learned almost nothing. My conclusion here is that the current", "we seek truth not just results. Often truth is evasive or impossible to", "is that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful,", "the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that the term is used", "because of the second idea above (fixed data set), but it is misnamed", "evidence as to the actual scientific truth, not just the appropriateness of the", "you don't know which time, unless you reproduce the study independently many times.", "which time, unless you reproduce the study independently many times. But the replications", "of the time. But you don't know which time, unless you reproduce the", "of the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that the term is", "truth, not (as in mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical techniques in particular", "set only partially helps us come to the proper answer for deep questions.", "is dear to my heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research as a term", "evidence of the truth, not (as in mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical", "the specific data itself. If a technique works for only a single set", "use techniques that give us evidence of the truth, not (as in mathematics)", "an additional benefit, in that the reader can examine the code to determine", "to flaws of statistical design in some sciences it seems to go deeper", "validated, not because the author doesn't publish enough information (which they probably don't),", "published research in the sciences can't be validated, not because the author doesn't", "caused me to think about the idea of reproducible-research and what the concept", "by which the data was collected (search terms for some sorts of data)", "to determine whether it is, indeed, the appropriate code to answer the research", "that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it", "need to be independent, and so can't use identical methods on identical data.", "truth not just results. Often truth is evasive or impossible to achieve definitively,", "isn't quite so good about the data, I think. Having a fixed data", "leads to contrary results. While this can be due to flaws of statistical", "are valuable, of course, so my concern is with the naming, not the", "simply means that the researcher has revealed enough that a reader can follow", "If a technique works for only a single set of data it applies", "that relate to this deeper concern. To do this, a researcher would need", "impossible to achieve definitively, so we often use techniques that give us evidence", "is misnamed as it is not adequate to answer a more important question.", "carried out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the study (properly) will yield an", "That is definitely a plus, but I'll suggest below that we need more.", "of data, rather than the larger question for which the data was gathered.", "standards, gives an opposing result, you have learned almost nothing. My conclusion here", "current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak", "code on that data to assure that the original authors aren't misrepresenting their", "to go deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a lot of", "validity of the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that the term", "out (properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the study (properly) will yield an improper", "to use this term, that a better term would be preferable, so as", "know the standards and techniques by which the data was collected (search terms", "that a better term would be preferable, so as to make an important", "The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become obvious that quite a", "nothing. My conclusion here is that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions", "to only that set of data, rather than the larger question for which", "this sad situation pervades a lot of educational research, which is dear to", "attack the same research question, perhaps in a different way, but get better", "actual scientific truth, not just the appropriateness of the methodology originally used. Why", "Why It Matters: --------------- In the sciences we seek truth not just results.", "term is used for a fairly simple idea that is applicable to (I'm", "is, indeed, the appropriate code to answer the research question. That is definitely", "concept better. The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become obvious that", "but get better evidence as to the actual scientific truth, not just the", "my concern is with the naming, not the validity of the underlying idea.", "give us evidence of the truth, not (as in mathematics) proof of the", "time, unless you reproduce the study independently many times. But the replications of", "evasive or impossible to achieve definitively, so we often use techniques that give", "because taking the same research questions and trying to answer them independently with", "only that set of data, rather than the larger question for which the", "sciences it seems to go deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades", "works for only a single set of data it applies to only that", "the replications of the study need to be independent, and so can't use", "to my heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research as a term be reserved", "below that we need more. The current concept isn't quite so good about", "time. But you don't know which time, unless you reproduce the study independently", "--------------------------- Recently it has become obvious that quite a lot of published research", "code to determine whether it is, indeed, the appropriate code to answer the", "the original authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the same code on the", "it has an additional benefit, in that the reader can examine the code", "independent party has enough information to attack the same research question, perhaps in", "about the idea of reproducible-research and what the concept means. I think that,", "follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one can demonstrate that the author", "rather than the larger question for which the data was gathered. If using", "the same research questions and trying to answer them independently with different models,", "that a reader can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one can", "than the specific data itself. If a technique works for only a single", "that researchers should publish their code and data so that others can run", "that code on that data to assure that the original authors aren't misrepresenting", "naming, not the validity of the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems", "Run the same code on the same data - get the same results.", "they probably don't), but because taking the same research questions and trying to", "but because taking the same research questions and trying to answer them independently", "independent, and so can't use identical methods on identical data. -- I may", "not just the appropriateness of the methodology originally used. Why It Matters: ---------------", "to cover the current concept better. The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it", "results. Often truth is evasive or impossible to achieve definitively, so we often", "It is weak because of the second idea above (fixed data set), but", "Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become obvious that quite a lot of published", "so my concern is with the naming, not the validity of the underlying", "of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak and mis-named.", "misnamed as it is not adequate to answer a more important question. But", "a fairly simple idea that is applicable to (I'm afraid) only some fields,", "for questions that relate to this deeper concern. To do this, a researcher", "particular work to quantify the potential that our conclusions are wrong. In a", "obvious that quite a lot of published research in the sciences can't be", "only partially helps us come to the proper answer for deep questions. You", "Often truth is evasive or impossible to achieve definitively, so we often use", "run that code on that data to assure that the original authors aren't", "These aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent simply means that the researcher has", "know which time, unless you reproduce the study independently many times. But the", "gives an opposing result, you have learned almost nothing. My conclusion here is", "the second idea above (fixed data set), but it is misnamed as it", "would need to reveal more, so that an independent party has enough information", "the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is", "same standards, gives an opposing result, you have learned almost nothing. My conclusion", "as computer science. The idea is that researchers should publish their code and", "reproducible-research as a term be reserved for questions that relate to this deeper", "reader can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one can demonstrate that", "that others can run that code on that data to assure that the", "idea is that researchers should publish their code and data so that others", "above (fixed data set), but it is misnamed as it is not adequate", "can't be validated, not because the author doesn't publish enough information (which they", "so as to make an important distinction. The term I would prefer for", "that data to assure that the original authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run", "completely. Verifiable means that one can demonstrate that the author hasn't lied in", "set, gathered to the same standards, gives an opposing result, you have learned", "term be reserved for questions that relate to this deeper concern. To do", "this deeper concern. To do this, a researcher would need to reveal more,", "In the sciences we seek truth not just results. Often truth is evasive", "of these are valuable, of course, so my concern is with the naming,", "seems that the term is used for a fairly simple idea that is", "Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a lot of educational research, which is dear", "some fields, such as computer science. The idea is that researchers should publish", "data, leads to contrary results. While this can be due to flaws of", "questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak and mis-named. It is weak", "independently many times. But the replications of the study need to be independent,", "\"show questions tagged 'reproducible-research'\") is useful, it is weak and mis-named. It is", "it seems to go deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a", "weak and mis-named. It is weak because of the second idea above (fixed", "not (as in mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical techniques in particular work", "(as in mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical techniques in particular work to", "confidence, replicating the study (properly) will yield an improper result 1% of the", "revealed enough that a reader can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that", "my heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research as a term be reserved for", "of published research in the sciences can't be validated, not because the author", "computer science. The idea is that researchers should publish their code and data", "to make an important distinction. The term I would prefer for this would", "that an independent party has enough information to attack the same research question,", "techniques that give us evidence of the truth, not (as in mathematics) proof", "questions and trying to answer them independently with different models, techniques, and data,", "others can run that code on that data to assure that the original", "aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the same code on the same data -", "underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that the term is used for", "assure that the original authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the same code", "have learned almost nothing. My conclusion here is that the current idea of", "contrary results. While this can be due to flaws of statistical design in", "research, which is dear to my heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research as", "helps us come to the proper answer for deep questions. You learn more,", "can examine the code to determine whether it is, indeed, the appropriate code", "appropriateness of the methodology originally used. Why It Matters: --------------- In the sciences", "results. Of course, it has an additional benefit, in that the reader can", "More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become obvious that quite a lot", "if you know the standards and techniques by which the data was collected", "truth. Statistical techniques in particular work to quantify the potential that our conclusions", "seems to go deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a lot", "seems to cover the current concept better. The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently", "is used for a fairly simple idea that is applicable to (I'm afraid)", "is evasive or impossible to achieve definitively, so we often use techniques that", "an improper result 1% of the time. But you don't know which time,", "which is dear to my heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research as a", "Matters: --------------- In the sciences we seek truth not just results. Often truth", "independently with different models, techniques, and data, leads to contrary results. While this", "do this, a researcher would need to reveal more, so that an independent", "think that, while it may be fairly common to use this term, that", "opposing result, you have learned almost nothing. My conclusion here is that the", "the truth. Statistical techniques in particular work to quantify the potential that our", "or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent simply means that", "the appropriateness of the methodology originally used. Why It Matters: --------------- In the", "lied in presenting conclusion. Both of these are valuable, of course, so my", "a lot of published research in the sciences can't be validated, not because", "that the author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both of these are valuable,", "of the methodology originally used. Why It Matters: --------------- In the sciences we", "verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent simply means that the researcher", "of reproducible-research and what the concept means. I think that, while it may", "would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't quite the same, actually. Transparent", "the same results. Of course, it has an additional benefit, in that the", "to contrary results. While this can be due to flaws of statistical design", "data set), but it is misnamed as it is not adequate to answer", "and techniques by which the data was collected (search terms for some sorts", "fields, such as computer science. The idea is that researchers should publish their", "set), but it is misnamed as it is not adequate to answer a", "data. -- I may need to edit this or append to it. Thinking...thinking", "study need to be independent, and so can't use identical methods on identical", "the author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both of these are valuable, of", "has caused me to think about the idea of reproducible-research and what the", "quite so good about the data, I think. Having a fixed data set", "reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one can demonstrate that the author hasn't lied", "us evidence of the truth, not (as in mathematics) proof of the truth.", "on identical data. -- I may need to edit this or append to", "applies to only that set of data, rather than the larger question for", "the methodology originally used. Why It Matters: --------------- In the sciences we seek", "the appropriate code to answer the research question. That is definitely a plus,", "distinction. The term I would prefer for this would be transparent-research or possibly", "important question. But transparent-research seems to cover the current concept better. The More", "single set of data it applies to only that set of data, rather", "study (properly) will yield an improper result 1% of the time. But you", "proof of the truth. Statistical techniques in particular work to quantify the potential", "an important distinction. The term I would prefer for this would be transparent-research", "fairly common to use this term, that a better term would be preferable,", "you know the standards and techniques by which the data was collected (search", "same data - get the same results. Of course, it has an additional", "It Matters: --------------- In the sciences we seek truth not just results. Often", "Of course, it has an additional benefit, in that the reader can examine", "many times. But the replications of the study need to be independent, and", "on the same data - get the same results. Of course, it has", "and data, leads to contrary results. While this can be due to flaws", "deeper than that. Unfortunately this sad situation pervades a lot of educational research,", "educational research, which is dear to my heart. I would prefer that reproducible-research", "it is misnamed as it is not adequate to answer a more important", "benefit, in that the reader can examine the code to determine whether it", "with 99% confidence, replicating the study (properly) will yield an improper result 1%", "preferable, so as to make an important distinction. The term I would prefer", "I think. Having a fixed data set only partially helps us come to", "Statistical techniques in particular work to quantify the potential that our conclusions are", "good about the data, I think. Having a fixed data set only partially", "lot of educational research, which is dear to my heart. I would prefer", "that the original authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the same code on", "99% confidence, replicating the study (properly) will yield an improper result 1% of", "because the author doesn't publish enough information (which they probably don't), but because", "trying to answer them independently with different models, techniques, and data, leads to", "Both of these are valuable, of course, so my concern is with the", "perhaps in a different way, but get better evidence as to the actual", "will yield an improper result 1% of the time. But you don't know", "fairly simple idea that is applicable to (I'm afraid) only some fields, such", "a different set, gathered to the same standards, gives an opposing result, you", "has enough information to attack the same research question, perhaps in a different", "publish enough information (which they probably don't), but because taking the same research", "need to reveal more, so that an independent party has enough information to", "one set of data gives one result, but a different set, gathered to", "of educational research, which is dear to my heart. I would prefer that", "used. Why It Matters: --------------- In the sciences we seek truth not just", "that quite a lot of published research in the sciences can't be validated,", "demonstrate that the author hasn't lied in presenting conclusion. Both of these are", "to answer them independently with different models, techniques, and data, leads to contrary", "truth, not just the appropriateness of the methodology originally used. Why It Matters:", "the actual scientific truth, not just the appropriateness of the methodology originally used.", "the code to determine whether it is, indeed, the appropriate code to answer", "the data, I think. Having a fixed data set only partially helps us", "can run that code on that data to assure that the original authors", "may be fairly common to use this term, that a better term would", "results. Run the same code on the same data - get the same", "answer them independently with different models, techniques, and data, leads to contrary results.", "yield an improper result 1% of the time. But you don't know which", "unless you reproduce the study independently many times. But the replications of the", "author doesn't publish enough information (which they probably don't), but because taking the", "a reader can follow the reasoning completely. Verifiable means that one can demonstrate", "than the larger question for which the data was gathered. If using one", "that the term is used for a fairly simple idea that is applicable", "to this deeper concern. To do this, a researcher would need to reveal", "sorts of data) than the specific data itself. If a technique works for", "reproducible-research and what the concept means. I think that, while it may be", "same, actually. Transparent simply means that the researcher has revealed enough that a", "I would prefer for this would be transparent-research or possibly verifiable-research. These aren't", "reserved for questions that relate to this deeper concern. To do this, a", "so we often use techniques that give us evidence of the truth, not", "it is weak and mis-named. It is weak because of the second idea", "way, but get better evidence as to the actual scientific truth, not just", "means that the researcher has revealed enough that a reader can follow the", "that we need more. The current concept isn't quite so good about the", "in mathematics) proof of the truth. Statistical techniques in particular work to quantify", "question, perhaps in a different way, but get better evidence as to the", "this can be due to flaws of statistical design in some sciences it", "Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that the term is used for a fairly", "data was collected (search terms for some sorts of data) than the specific", "technique works for only a single set of data it applies to only", "that, while it may be fairly common to use this term, that a", "current concept isn't quite so good about the data, I think. Having a", "answer for deep questions. You learn more, of course, if you know the", "times. But the replications of the study need to be independent, and so", "data, rather than the larger question for which the data was gathered. If", "the current concept better. The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has become", "not just results. Often truth is evasive or impossible to achieve definitively, so", "idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that the term is used for a", "in that the reader can examine the code to determine whether it is,", "data) than the specific data itself. If a technique works for only a", "not adequate to answer a more important question. But transparent-research seems to cover", "question for which the data was gathered. If using one set of data", "the potential that our conclusions are wrong. In a study carried out (properly)", "whether it is, indeed, the appropriate code to answer the research question. That", "more important question. But transparent-research seems to cover the current concept better. The", "cover the current concept better. The More Important Problem: --------------------------- Recently it has", "The current concept isn't quite so good about the data, I think. Having", "can't use identical methods on identical data. -- I may need to edit", "means. I think that, while it may be fairly common to use this", "more, so that an independent party has enough information to attack the same", "it has become obvious that quite a lot of published research in the", "presenting conclusion. Both of these are valuable, of course, so my concern is", "techniques by which the data was collected (search terms for some sorts of", "reproduce the study independently many times. But the replications of the study need", "almost nothing. My conclusion here is that the current idea of [reproducible-research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/reproducible-research \"show", "sciences we seek truth not just results. Often truth is evasive or impossible", "and so can't use identical methods on identical data. -- I may need", "as to make an important distinction. The term I would prefer for this", "work to quantify the potential that our conclusions are wrong. In a study", "The idea is that researchers should publish their code and data so that", "(properly) with 99% confidence, replicating the study (properly) will yield an improper result", "Transparent simply means that the researcher has revealed enough that a reader can", "the study (properly) will yield an improper result 1% of the time. But", "it may be fairly common to use this term, that a better term", "need more. The current concept isn't quite so good about the data, I", "fixed data set only partially helps us come to the proper answer for", "the same code on the same data - get the same results. Of", "data, I think. Having a fixed data set only partially helps us come", "replicating the study (properly) will yield an improper result 1% of the time.", "data set only partially helps us come to the proper answer for deep", "seek truth not just results. Often truth is evasive or impossible to achieve", "concept means. I think that, while it may be fairly common to use", "While this can be due to flaws of statistical design in some sciences", "authors aren't misrepresenting their results. Run the same code on the same data", "better evidence as to the actual scientific truth, not just the appropriateness of", "same research questions and trying to answer them independently with different models, techniques,", "is weak and mis-named. It is weak because of the second idea above", "quantify the potential that our conclusions are wrong. In a study carried out", "suggest below that we need more. The current concept isn't quite so good", "not the validity of the underlying idea. Background: ----------- Currently, it seems that", "Verifiable means that one can demonstrate that the author hasn't lied in presenting", "of the truth. Statistical techniques in particular work to quantify the potential that", "don't know which time, unless you reproduce the study independently many times. But", "relate to this deeper concern. To do this, a researcher would need to", "is weak because of the second idea above (fixed data set), but it", "an independent party has enough information to attack the same research question, perhaps", "You learn more, of course, if you know the standards and techniques by", "one result, but a different set, gathered to the same standards, gives an", "definitely a plus, but I'll suggest below that we need more. The current", "improper result 1% of the time. But you don't know which time, unless", "appropriate code to answer the research question. That is definitely a plus, but" ]
[ "what was asked, but it's pretty close. And then people write serious answers", "to shoot people if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what was", "acceptable to shoot people if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what", "pretty close. And then people write serious answers saying \"No, that's not ok", "it's not trivial. Is it just me or is that question and its", "people if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what was asked, but", "it just me or is that question and its answers kind of farcical?", "Well, that's not exactly what was asked, but it's pretty close. And then", "they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what was asked, but it's pretty", "trivial. Is it just me or is that question and its answers kind", "you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what was asked, but it's pretty close. And", "all\" - as if it's not trivial. Is it just me or is", "And then people write serious answers saying \"No, that's not ok at all\"", "it acceptable to shoot people if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly", "not exactly what was asked, but it's pretty close. And then people write", "write serious answers saying \"No, that's not ok at all\" - as if", "that's not exactly what was asked, but it's pretty close. And then people", "close. And then people write serious answers saying \"No, that's not ok at", "asked, but it's pretty close. And then people write serious answers saying \"No,", "exactly what was asked, but it's pretty close. And then people write serious", "[\"Is it acceptable to shoot people if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not", "if it's not trivial. Is it just me or is that question and", "Is it just me or is that question and its answers kind of", "ok at all\" - as if it's not trivial. Is it just me", "saying \"No, that's not ok at all\" - as if it's not trivial.", "if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what was asked, but it's", "answers saying \"No, that's not ok at all\" - as if it's not", "not trivial. Is it just me or is that question and its answers", "annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what was asked, but it's pretty close.", "that's not ok at all\" - as if it's not trivial. Is it", "was asked, but it's pretty close. And then people write serious answers saying", "people write serious answers saying \"No, that's not ok at all\" - as", "then people write serious answers saying \"No, that's not ok at all\" -", "serious answers saying \"No, that's not ok at all\" - as if it's", "\"No, that's not ok at all\" - as if it's not trivial. Is", "as if it's not trivial. Is it just me or is that question", "at all\" - as if it's not trivial. Is it just me or", "- as if it's not trivial. Is it just me or is that", "it's pretty close. And then people write serious answers saying \"No, that's not", "shoot people if they annoy you?\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120966/is-it-acceptable-to-publish-student-names-with-the-label-stupid-question) Well, that's not exactly what was asked,", "not ok at all\" - as if it's not trivial. Is it just", "but it's pretty close. And then people write serious answers saying \"No, that's" ]
[ "about studies about peer reviewing. It was voted to close as off-topic and", "of bounds. > > > I understand this to refer to closure about", "about the content of research – which we usually consider off-topic here. However,", "topic. That would put it out of bounds. > > > I understand", "research is academia itself. My question is: Should such questions about sociological or", "want people here to do your research on a particular topic. That would", "about peer reviewing. It was voted to close as off-topic and one of", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/121920/7734) asks about studies about peer reviewing. It was voted to close as", "people here to do your research on a particular topic. That would put", "voted to close as off-topic and one of the close voters gave the", "itself. My question is: Should such questions about sociological or other research whose", "would put it out of bounds. > > > I understand this to", "the argument: > > This reads as if you want people here to", "close as off-topic and one of the close voters gave the argument: >", "research – which we usually consider off-topic here. However, here the content of", "off-topic here. However, here the content of research is academia itself. My question", "It was voted to close as off-topic and one of the close voters", "is academia itself. My question is: Should such questions about sociological or other", "reviewing. It was voted to close as off-topic and one of the close", "as off-topic and one of the close voters gave the argument: > >", "it out of bounds. > > > I understand this to refer to", "or other research whose subject is academia be off-topic or do we make", "particular topic. That would put it out of bounds. > > > I", "as if you want people here to do your research on a particular", "you want people here to do your research on a particular topic. That", "is: Should such questions about sociological or other research whose subject is academia", "one of the close voters gave the argument: > > This reads as", "of research is academia itself. My question is: Should such questions about sociological", "of research – which we usually consider off-topic here. However, here the content", "of the close voters gave the argument: > > This reads as if", "closure about the content of research – which we usually consider off-topic here.", "questions about sociological or other research whose subject is academia be off-topic or", "here the content of research is academia itself. My question is: Should such", "to close as off-topic and one of the close voters gave the argument:", "asks about studies about peer reviewing. It was voted to close as off-topic", "studies about peer reviewing. It was voted to close as off-topic and one", "to closure about the content of research – which we usually consider off-topic", "other research whose subject is academia be off-topic or do we make an", "– which we usually consider off-topic here. However, here the content of research", "subject is academia be off-topic or do we make an exception for them?", "do your research on a particular topic. That would put it out of", "the close voters gave the argument: > > This reads as if you", "content of research – which we usually consider off-topic here. However, here the", "was voted to close as off-topic and one of the close voters gave", "the content of research – which we usually consider off-topic here. However, here", "put it out of bounds. > > > I understand this to refer", "about sociological or other research whose subject is academia be off-topic or do", "research on a particular topic. That would put it out of bounds. >", "> > > I understand this to refer to closure about the content", "the content of research is academia itself. My question is: Should such questions", "Should such questions about sociological or other research whose subject is academia be", "question is: Should such questions about sociological or other research whose subject is", "we usually consider off-topic here. However, here the content of research is academia", "> I understand this to refer to closure about the content of research", "gave the argument: > > This reads as if you want people here", "off-topic and one of the close voters gave the argument: > > This", "[This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/121920/7734) asks about studies about peer reviewing. It was voted to close", "This reads as if you want people here to do your research on", "bounds. > > > I understand this to refer to closure about the", "this to refer to closure about the content of research – which we", "My question is: Should such questions about sociological or other research whose subject", "peer reviewing. It was voted to close as off-topic and one of the", "usually consider off-topic here. However, here the content of research is academia itself.", "However, here the content of research is academia itself. My question is: Should", "such questions about sociological or other research whose subject is academia be off-topic", "That would put it out of bounds. > > > I understand this", "content of research is academia itself. My question is: Should such questions about", "I understand this to refer to closure about the content of research –", "> > This reads as if you want people here to do your", "academia itself. My question is: Should such questions about sociological or other research", "argument: > > This reads as if you want people here to do", "sociological or other research whose subject is academia be off-topic or do we", "whose subject is academia be off-topic or do we make an exception for", "research whose subject is academia be off-topic or do we make an exception", "here. However, here the content of research is academia itself. My question is:", "close voters gave the argument: > > This reads as if you want", "here to do your research on a particular topic. That would put it", "to do your research on a particular topic. That would put it out", "reads as if you want people here to do your research on a", "understand this to refer to closure about the content of research – which", "> > I understand this to refer to closure about the content of", "out of bounds. > > > I understand this to refer to closure", "if you want people here to do your research on a particular topic.", "your research on a particular topic. That would put it out of bounds.", "consider off-topic here. However, here the content of research is academia itself. My", "to refer to closure about the content of research – which we usually", "voters gave the argument: > > This reads as if you want people", "refer to closure about the content of research – which we usually consider", "which we usually consider off-topic here. However, here the content of research is", "on a particular topic. That would put it out of bounds. > >", "> This reads as if you want people here to do your research", "and one of the close voters gave the argument: > > This reads", "a particular topic. That would put it out of bounds. > > >" ]
[ "was a pretty aggressive accusation with both the specific supervisor and accuser clearly", "likely unfounded, but I wonder if we want things like this to be", "in other situations that may not be the case, especially circumstances where the", "for 10 k users only) which was a pretty aggressive accusation with both", "accuser clearly identified. I think most of the answers and comments are directed", "things like this to be part of Academia.SE. There is enough background here", "other situations that may not be the case, especially circumstances where the facts/details", "part of Academia.SE. There is enough background here to pretty much absolve the", "I'm a bit concerned about [a recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10", "accusation with both the specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I think most", "directed towards helping OP understand why their accusations are likely unfounded, but I", "in my opinion, but in other situations that may not be the case,", "but I wonder if we want things like this to be part of", "their accusations are likely unfounded, but I wonder if we want things like", "my opinion, but in other situations that may not be the case, especially", "bit concerned about [a recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10 k users", "to pretty much absolve the lab involved in my opinion, but in other", "I think most of the answers and comments are directed towards helping OP", "may not be the case, especially circumstances where the facts/details are less publicly", "link for 10 k users only) which was a pretty aggressive accusation with", "recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10 k users only) which was a", "not be the case, especially circumstances where the facts/details are less publicly available.", "this to be part of Academia.SE. There is enough background here to pretty", "situations that may not be the case, especially circumstances where the facts/details are", "users only) which was a pretty aggressive accusation with both the specific supervisor", "about [a recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10 k users only) which", "aggressive accusation with both the specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I think", "post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10 k users only) which was a pretty", "which was a pretty aggressive accusation with both the specific supervisor and accuser", "pretty aggressive accusation with both the specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I", "the lab involved in my opinion, but in other situations that may not", "Academia.SE. There is enough background here to pretty much absolve the lab involved", "[a recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10 k users only) which was", "want things like this to be part of Academia.SE. There is enough background", "most of the answers and comments are directed towards helping OP understand why", "unfounded, but I wonder if we want things like this to be part", "the specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I think most of the answers", "and comments are directed towards helping OP understand why their accusations are likely", "involved in my opinion, but in other situations that may not be the", "think most of the answers and comments are directed towards helping OP understand", "helping OP understand why their accusations are likely unfounded, but I wonder if", "but in other situations that may not be the case, especially circumstances where", "accusations are likely unfounded, but I wonder if we want things like this", "clearly identified. I think most of the answers and comments are directed towards", "I wonder if we want things like this to be part of Academia.SE.", "that may not be the case, especially circumstances where the facts/details are less", "specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I think most of the answers and", "of Academia.SE. There is enough background here to pretty much absolve the lab", "here to pretty much absolve the lab involved in my opinion, but in", "only) which was a pretty aggressive accusation with both the specific supervisor and", "(now deleted, link for 10 k users only) which was a pretty aggressive", "a pretty aggressive accusation with both the specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified.", "and accuser clearly identified. I think most of the answers and comments are", "OP understand why their accusations are likely unfounded, but I wonder if we", "identified. I think most of the answers and comments are directed towards helping", "There is enough background here to pretty much absolve the lab involved in", "10 k users only) which was a pretty aggressive accusation with both the", "is enough background here to pretty much absolve the lab involved in my", "if we want things like this to be part of Academia.SE. There is", "much absolve the lab involved in my opinion, but in other situations that", "towards helping OP understand why their accusations are likely unfounded, but I wonder", "understand why their accusations are likely unfounded, but I wonder if we want", "opinion, but in other situations that may not be the case, especially circumstances", "enough background here to pretty much absolve the lab involved in my opinion,", "both the specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I think most of the", "be part of Academia.SE. There is enough background here to pretty much absolve", "are likely unfounded, but I wonder if we want things like this to", "k users only) which was a pretty aggressive accusation with both the specific", "a bit concerned about [a recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10 k", "concerned about [a recent post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103328) (now deleted, link for 10 k users only)", "to be part of Academia.SE. There is enough background here to pretty much", "the answers and comments are directed towards helping OP understand why their accusations", "absolve the lab involved in my opinion, but in other situations that may", "deleted, link for 10 k users only) which was a pretty aggressive accusation", "are directed towards helping OP understand why their accusations are likely unfounded, but", "pretty much absolve the lab involved in my opinion, but in other situations", "with both the specific supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I think most of", "wonder if we want things like this to be part of Academia.SE. There", "lab involved in my opinion, but in other situations that may not be", "like this to be part of Academia.SE. There is enough background here to", "background here to pretty much absolve the lab involved in my opinion, but", "of the answers and comments are directed towards helping OP understand why their", "answers and comments are directed towards helping OP understand why their accusations are", "why their accusations are likely unfounded, but I wonder if we want things", "comments are directed towards helping OP understand why their accusations are likely unfounded,", "supervisor and accuser clearly identified. I think most of the answers and comments", "we want things like this to be part of Academia.SE. There is enough" ]
[ "being pointless is not a reason for not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't", "but being pointless is not a reason for not doing something (otherwise, we", "wouldn't have hats in the first place). Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness?", "realize the votes have been overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so they might", "not a reason for not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in", "something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in the first place). Was there some", "hats in the first place). Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we", "place). Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given up on any", "in the first place). Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given", "haven't there polls the past couple of years? I realize the votes have", "there polls the past couple of years? I realize the votes have been", "been overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so they might seem pointless, but being", "they might seem pointless, but being pointless is not a reason for not", "were polls](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3561/19607) asking if we wanted to participate in the annual Winter Bash", "Why haven't there polls the past couple of years? I realize the votes", "we wanted to participate in the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't", "overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so they might seem pointless, but being pointless", "polls](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3561/19607) asking if we wanted to participate in the annual Winter Bash Hat", "(otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in the first place). Was there some discussion?", "Festivals. Why haven't there polls the past couple of years? I realize the", "reason for not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in the first", "in favor of hats, so they might seem pointless, but being pointless is", "years? I realize the votes have been overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so", "participate in the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls the", "for not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in the first place).", "I realize the votes have been overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so they", "might seem pointless, but being pointless is not a reason for not doing", "the first place). Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given up", "Up until 2016, [there were polls](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3561/19607) asking if we wanted to participate in", "have been overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so they might seem pointless, but", "in the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls the past", "first place). Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given up on", "so they might seem pointless, but being pointless is not a reason for", "favor of hats, so they might seem pointless, but being pointless is not", "doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in the first place). Was there", "[there were polls](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3561/19607) asking if we wanted to participate in the annual Winter", "wanted to participate in the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there", "annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls the past couple of", "the votes have been overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so they might seem", "until 2016, [there were polls](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3561/19607) asking if we wanted to participate in the", "asking if we wanted to participate in the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals.", "the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls the past couple", "polls the past couple of years? I realize the votes have been overwhelmingly", "past couple of years? I realize the votes have been overwhelmingly in favor", "of hats, so they might seem pointless, but being pointless is not a", "seem pointless, but being pointless is not a reason for not doing something", "pointless is not a reason for not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have", "not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in the first place). Was", "we wouldn't have hats in the first place). Was there some discussion? Laziness?", "there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given up on any semblance of", "Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls the past couple of years? I realize", "if we wanted to participate in the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why", "pointless, but being pointless is not a reason for not doing something (otherwise,", "the past couple of years? I realize the votes have been overwhelmingly in", "of years? I realize the votes have been overwhelmingly in favor of hats,", "Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls the past couple of years? I", "hats, so they might seem pointless, but being pointless is not a reason", "Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls the past couple of years?", "couple of years? I realize the votes have been overwhelmingly in favor of", "some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given up on any semblance of democracy?", "Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have we given up on any semblance", "have hats in the first place). Was there some discussion? Laziness? Forgetfulness? Have", "to participate in the annual Winter Bash Hat Festivals. Why haven't there polls", "2016, [there were polls](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3561/19607) asking if we wanted to participate in the annual", "is not a reason for not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats", "votes have been overwhelmingly in favor of hats, so they might seem pointless,", "a reason for not doing something (otherwise, we wouldn't have hats in the" ]
[ "a different way. What I really want to ask (as I wrote in", "question since it explicitly names two universities only. * Start another question with", "only. * Start another question with \"why is research at Oxford in general", "to this is yes, then I can start another question after that linking", "are not really relevant to what I want to ask. Clearly I worded", "at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that question focus on", "sidestep objections based on ranking methodology; however it's not apparent to me that", "names two universities only. * Start another question with \"why is research at", "However this seems like an overly narrow question since it explicitly names two", "how the rankings came about, which are not really relevant to what I", "The question asks why there is a correlation. > > > I don't", "Start another question with \"why is research at Oxford in general better than", "the previous option: it's narrow. * Start another question picking universities by [THE", "there is a correlation. > > > I don't think this question is", "[THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based on ranking methodology; however it's", "vacuum there does not have to be a correlation between the two factors).", "the question by editing out the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still", "in your field is performed. If you next compare where that is versus", "even though I'd left in a note that I'm not interested in cultural", "list itself, they should, but in a vacuum there does not have to", "like an overly narrow question since it explicitly names two universities only. ", "I wrote in a comment to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you are", "Start another question with \"is research at Oxford in general better than at", "than at Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous option: it's narrow. Start", "correlation. > > > I don't think this question is salvageable unfortunately. What", "have some idea where the best research in your field is performed. If", "in a different way. What I really want to ask (as I wrote", "seems like an overly narrow question since it explicitly names two universities only.", "not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that question focus on critiquing", "narrow question since it explicitly names two universities only. * Start another question", "but in a vacuum there does not have to be a correlation between", "What should I do now? * Start another question with \"is research at", "should, but in a vacuum there does not have to be a correlation", "general better than at Southampton?\" If the answer to this is yes, then", "poorly. I've already tried to focus the question by editing out the mention", "the list itself, they should, but in a vacuum there does not have", "is research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\". Same issue as", "start another question after that linking to this question. However this seems like", "better than at Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous option: it's narrow. ", "the best reputations also do the best research (looking at the list itself,", "versus where the top universities in the world are, you should see a", "to what I want to ask. Clearly I worded the question poorly. I've", "however it's not apparent to me that the universities with the best reputations", "field is performed. If you next compare where that is versus where the", "continue to interpret the question in a different way. What I really want", "in a note that I'm not interested in cultural factors), but it's evidently", "is performed. If you next compare where that is versus where the top", "want to ask (as I wrote in a comment to Thulos's answer): >", "came about, which are not really relevant to what I want to ask.", "not really relevant to what I want to ask. Clearly I worded the", "have to be a correlation between the two factors). Do nothing and", "evidently not good enough and people continue to interpret the question in a", "by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based on ranking methodology; however", "institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that question focus on critiquing how the rankings", "worded the question poorly. I've already tried to focus the question by editing", "that question focus on critiquing how the rankings came about, which are not", "the question poorly. I've already tried to focus the question by editing out", "Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led to responses about the anglosphere and whatnot", "already tried to focus the question by editing out the mention of Zhejiang", "should see a positive correlation. The question asks why there is a correlation.", "editing out the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led to responses", "between the two factors). * Do nothing and accept paul garrett's answer. ", "Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you are an academic, you'll have some idea", "where the best research in your field is performed. If you next compare", "this question. However this seems like an overly narrow question since it explicitly", "question is salvageable unfortunately. What should I do now? Start another question", "I'd left in a note that I'm not interested in cultural factors), but", "question with \"is research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\" If", "mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led to responses about the anglosphere", "previous option: it's narrow. * Start another question picking universities by [THE reputation", "question after that linking to this question. However this seems like an overly", "answers to that question focus on critiquing how the rankings came about, which", "want to ask. Clearly I worded the question poorly. I've already tried to", "the answer to this is yes, then I can start another question after", "narrow. * Start another question picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might", "general better than at Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous option: it's narrow.", "I worded the question poorly. I've already tried to focus the question by", "your field is performed. If you next compare where that is versus where", "research in your field is performed. If you next compare where that is", "I don't think this question is salvageable unfortunately. What should I do now?", "it's narrow. * Start another question picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which", "asks why there is a correlation. > > > I don't think this", "to ask. Clearly I worded the question poorly. I've already tried to focus", "are, you should see a positive correlation. The question asks why there is", "salvageable unfortunately. What should I do now? * Start another question with \"is", "good enough and people continue to interpret the question in a different way.", "compare where that is versus where the top universities in the world are,", "What I really want to ask (as I wrote in a comment to", "Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous option:", "different way. What I really want to ask (as I wrote in a", "I can start another question after that linking to this question. However this", "a comment to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you are an academic, you'll", "by editing out the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led to", "do now? * Start another question with \"is research at Oxford in general", "productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that question focus on critiquing how", "question in a different way. What I really want to ask (as I", "not have to be a correlation between the two factors). * Do nothing", "wrote in a comment to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you are an", "unfortunately. What should I do now? * Start another question with \"is research", "with \"is research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\" If the", "\"why is research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\". Same issue", "question asks why there is a correlation. > > > I don't think", "> > > I don't think this question is salvageable unfortunately. What should", "really want to ask (as I wrote in a comment to Thulos's answer):", "the world are, you should see a positive correlation. The question asks why", "you next compare where that is versus where the top universities in the", "another question with \"why is research at Oxford in general better than at", "universities with the best reputations also do the best research (looking at the", "this still led to responses about the anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd", "in the world are, you should see a positive correlation. The question asks", "think this question is salvageable unfortunately. What should I do now? * Start", "Unfortunately the answers to that question focus on critiquing how the rankings came", "it's evidently not good enough and people continue to interpret the question in", "universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based on ranking methodology;", "a vacuum there does not have to be a correlation between the two", "overly narrow question since it explicitly names two universities only. * Start another", "objections based on ranking methodology; however it's not apparent to me that the", "should I do now? * Start another question with \"is research at Oxford", "and people continue to interpret the question in a different way. What I", "you are an academic, you'll have some idea where the best research in", "also do the best research (looking at the list itself, they should, but", "after that linking to this question. However this seems like an overly narrow", "question poorly. I've already tried to focus the question by editing out the", "picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based on ranking", "Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous option: it's narrow. * Start another question", "not good enough and people continue to interpret the question in a different", "might sidestep objections based on ranking methodology; however it's not apparent to me", "> > Assuming you are an academic, you'll have some idea where the", "to be a correlation between the two factors). * Do nothing and accept", "is salvageable unfortunately. What should I do now? * Start another question with", "Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\" If the answer to this is", "you should see a positive correlation. The question asks why there is a", "ask (as I wrote in a comment to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming", "another question after that linking to this question. However this seems like an", "> > I don't think this question is salvageable unfortunately. What should I", "it's not apparent to me that the universities with the best reputations also", "not interested in cultural factors), but it's evidently not good enough and people", "relevant to what I want to ask. Clearly I worded the question poorly.", "idea where the best research in your field is performed. If you next", "in a comment to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you are an academic,", "than at Southampton?\" If the answer to this is yes, then I can", "as the previous option: it's narrow. * Start another question picking universities by", "an overly narrow question since it explicitly names two universities only. * Start", "better than those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that", "the anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd left in a note that I'm", "that is versus where the top universities in the world are, you should", "University (depressingly this still led to responses about the anglosphere and whatnot even", "research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\". Same issue as the", "whatnot even though I'd left in a note that I'm not interested in", "reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based on ranking methodology; however it's not", "the universities with the best reputations also do the best research (looking at", "a correlation between the two factors). * Do nothing and accept paul garrett's", "answer): > > Assuming you are an academic, you'll have some idea where", "at highly productive research institutions better than those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734)", "productive research institutions better than those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the", "see a positive correlation. The question asks why there is a correlation. >", "I do now? * Start another question with \"is research at Oxford in", "is yes, then I can start another question after that linking to this", "focus on critiquing how the rankings came about, which are not really relevant", "critiquing how the rankings came about, which are not really relevant to what", "question. However this seems like an overly narrow question since it explicitly names", "(as I wrote in a comment to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you", "can start another question after that linking to this question. However this seems", "at the list itself, they should, but in a vacuum there does not", "best research in your field is performed. If you next compare where that", "next compare where that is versus where the top universities in the world", "on ranking methodology; however it's not apparent to me that the universities with", "to this question. However this seems like an overly narrow question since it", "reputations also do the best research (looking at the list itself, they should,", "don't think this question is salvageable unfortunately. What should I do now? ", "this question is salvageable unfortunately. What should I do now? Start another", "academic, you'll have some idea where the best research in your field is", "though I'd left in a note that I'm not interested in cultural factors),", "with \"why is research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\". Same", "\"is research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\" If the answer", "rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based on ranking methodology; however it's not apparent", "there does not have to be a correlation between the two factors). ", "is versus where the top universities in the world are, you should see", "responses about the anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd left in a note", "I really want to ask (as I wrote in a comment to Thulos's", "If the answer to this is yes, then I can start another question", "top universities in the world are, you should see a positive correlation. The", "ask. Clearly I worded the question poorly. I've already tried to focus the", "If you next compare where that is versus where the top universities in", "Assuming you are an academic, you'll have some idea where the best research", "in general better than at Southampton?\" If the answer to this is yes,", "itself, they should, but in a vacuum there does not have to be", "apparent to me that the universities with the best reputations also do the", "comment to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you are an academic, you'll have", "cultural factors), but it's evidently not good enough and people continue to interpret", "which are not really relevant to what I want to ask. Clearly I", "still led to responses about the anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd left", "better than at Southampton?\" If the answer to this is yes, then I", "out the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led to responses about", "the rankings came about, which are not really relevant to what I want", "at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\" If the answer to this", "rankings came about, which are not really relevant to what I want to", "on critiquing how the rankings came about, which are not really relevant to", "factors), but it's evidently not good enough and people continue to interpret the", "not apparent to me that the universities with the best reputations also do", "in a vacuum there does not have to be a correlation between the", "interested in cultural factors), but it's evidently not good enough and people continue", "Clearly I worded the question poorly. I've already tried to focus the question", " Start another question with \"is research at Oxford in general better than", "the top universities in the world are, you should see a positive correlation.", "are an academic, you'll have some idea where the best research in your", "research (looking at the list itself, they should, but in a vacuum there", "a note that I'm not interested in cultural factors), but it's evidently not", "an academic, you'll have some idea where the best research in your field", "to that question focus on critiquing how the rankings came about, which are", "I want to ask. Clearly I worded the question poorly. I've already tried", "note that I'm not interested in cultural factors), but it's evidently not good", "to focus the question by editing out the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly", "led to responses about the anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd left in", "[Why is research at highly productive research institutions better than those at not-so-highly", "Same issue as the previous option: it's narrow. * Start another question picking", "but it's evidently not good enough and people continue to interpret the question", "be a correlation between the two factors). * Do nothing and accept paul", "Start another question picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections", "and whatnot even though I'd left in a note that I'm not interested", "me that the universities with the best reputations also do the best research", "(looking at the list itself, they should, but in a vacuum there does", "Southampton?\" If the answer to this is yes, then I can start another", "world are, you should see a positive correlation. The question asks why there", "this seems like an overly narrow question since it explicitly names two universities", "the best research (looking at the list itself, they should, but in a", "it explicitly names two universities only. * Start another question with \"why is", "(depressingly this still led to responses about the anglosphere and whatnot even though", "where that is versus where the top universities in the world are, you", "answer to this is yes, then I can start another question after that", "* Start another question with \"why is research at Oxford in general better", "in cultural factors), but it's evidently not good enough and people continue to", "this is yes, then I can start another question after that linking to", "the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led to responses about the", "people continue to interpret the question in a different way. What I really", "research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that question focus on critiquing how the", "* Start another question picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep", "anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd left in a note that I'm not", "that the universities with the best reputations also do the best research (looking", "what I want to ask. Clearly I worded the question poorly. I've already", "yes, then I can start another question after that linking to this question.", "do the best research (looking at the list itself, they should, but in", "way. What I really want to ask (as I wrote in a comment", "at Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous option: it's narrow. * Start another", "to me that the universities with the best reputations also do the best", "is a correlation. > > > I don't think this question is salvageable", "which might sidestep objections based on ranking methodology; however it's not apparent to", "methodology; however it's not apparent to me that the universities with the best", "issue as the previous option: it's narrow. * Start another question picking universities", "research at highly productive research institutions better than those at not-so-highly productive research", "the best research in your field is performed. If you next compare where", "the question in a different way. What I really want to ask (as", "best research (looking at the list itself, they should, but in a vacuum", "some idea where the best research in your field is performed. If you", "explicitly names two universities only. * Start another question with \"why is research", "research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\" If the answer to", "interpret the question in a different way. What I really want to ask", "left in a note that I'm not interested in cultural factors), but it's", "a positive correlation. The question asks why there is a correlation. > >", "option: it's narrow. * Start another question picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats),", "since it explicitly names two universities only. * Start another question with \"why", "ranking methodology; however it's not apparent to me that the universities with the", "correlation. The question asks why there is a correlation. > > > I", "that linking to this question. However this seems like an overly narrow question", "best reputations also do the best research (looking at the list itself, they", "to responses about the anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd left in a", "they should, but in a vacuum there does not have to be a", "linking to this question. However this seems like an overly narrow question since", "based on ranking methodology; however it's not apparent to me that the universities", "about the anglosphere and whatnot even though I'd left in a note that", "universities only. * Start another question with \"why is research at Oxford in", "enough and people continue to interpret the question in a different way. What", "> Assuming you are an academic, you'll have some idea where the best", "where the top universities in the world are, you should see a positive", "the answers to that question focus on critiquing how the rankings came about,", "really relevant to what I want to ask. Clearly I worded the question", "correlation between the two factors). * Do nothing and accept paul garrett's answer.", "about, which are not really relevant to what I want to ask. Clearly", "at Southampton?\" If the answer to this is yes, then I can start", "institutions better than those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to", "highly productive research institutions better than those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately", "then I can start another question after that linking to this question. However", "to interpret the question in a different way. What I really want to", "question with \"why is research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\".", "another question with \"is research at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\"", "I'm not interested in cultural factors), but it's evidently not good enough and", "why there is a correlation. > > > I don't think this question", "than those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that question", "focus the question by editing out the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this", "at Oxford in general better than at Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous", "performed. If you next compare where that is versus where the top universities", "does not have to be a correlation between the two factors). * Do", "another question picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based", "is research at highly productive research institutions better than those at not-so-highly productive", "with the best reputations also do the best research (looking at the list", "I've already tried to focus the question by editing out the mention of", "> I don't think this question is salvageable unfortunately. What should I do", "that I'm not interested in cultural factors), but it's evidently not good enough", "the two factors). * Do nothing and accept paul garrett's answer. * Something", "universities in the world are, you should see a positive correlation. The question", "a correlation. > > > I don't think this question is salvageable unfortunately.", "you'll have some idea where the best research in your field is performed.", "those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers to that question focus", "now? * Start another question with \"is research at Oxford in general better", "question by editing out the mention of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led", "two universities only. * Start another question with \"why is research at Oxford", "positive correlation. The question asks why there is a correlation. > > >", "to Thulos's answer): > > Assuming you are an academic, you'll have some", "in general better than at Southampton?\". Same issue as the previous option: it's", "tried to focus the question by editing out the mention of Zhejiang University", "question picking universities by [THE reputation rankings](https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/reputation-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats), which might sidestep objections based on", "question focus on critiquing how the rankings came about, which are not really", "research institutions better than those at not-so-highly productive research institutions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/122944/7734) Unfortunately the answers", "two factors). * Do nothing and accept paul garrett's answer. * Something else?", "of Zhejiang University (depressingly this still led to responses about the anglosphere and", "to ask (as I wrote in a comment to Thulos's answer): > >" ]
[ "form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ```", "Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on", "addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the", "advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form.", "twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs ", "a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and will", "in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process.", "If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The", "mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything else to", "Please do not add anything else to the body of the post. If", "to this question must* conform to the following rules, or they will be", "show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of", "the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while", "a way to promote information and resources that are relevant to your own", "it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the", "are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the", "vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable", "hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) Must be GIF or PNG", "If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and", "exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to this question", "cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material", "as a way to promote information and resources that are relevant to your", "x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. Must be hosted", "* The image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or", "way to promote information and resources that are relevant to your own community's", "create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI.", "300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. Must be", "stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a way to promote", " cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be", "a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to", "* Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit", "for future visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems important.", "Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on", "'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag", "can check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click", "be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. * Must", "the post. If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments.", "here! And with the new year, as usual, comes a new iteration of", "is a method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors", "it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold** an answer must", "a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post", "limit on file size of 150 KB * If the background of the", "year :) ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted", "interests, both for those already in the community and those yet to join.", "served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things.", "community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right", "the background of the image is white or partially white, there must be", "serves as a way to promote information and resources that are relevant to", "Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in", "in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from", "every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad", "else to the body of the post*. If you want to discuss something,", "the site's twitter account academic websites and resources * interesting campus story", "restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service", "we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the", "be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the", "both for those already in the community and those yet to join. ###", "Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane", "this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled", "the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does", "to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following things:", "community and will continue to be so, it is a good idea to", "a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will", "minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be", "the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a way to", "advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This", "the body of the post*. If you want to discuss something, do it", "to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year", "service or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to", "white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it.", "the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For", "resources interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything", "are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show", "to the body of the post*. If you want to discuss something, do", "community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion", "question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community", "new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the", "genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out", "uploader (imgur) Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs ", "might promote the following things: the site's twitter account * academic websites", "score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown", "for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the", "other things will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting", "Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold** an answer must meet (currently", "the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with", "pixels, or double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our", "Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main", "of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to", "in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset", "answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the main", "community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we", "an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the", "image is white or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px", "(currently 6) before it will be shown on the main site. You can", "ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions", "they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form", "required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must be", "those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year?", "years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces to show", "community deems important. This also serves as a way to promote information and", "and resources interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences ", "do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over", "be shown on the main site. You can check out the ads that", "(imgur) Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute", "the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is", "a new iteration of Community Promotion Ads! Let’s refresh these for the coming", "community's interests, both for those already in the community and those yet to", "will continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost it.", "in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic", "size of 150 KB If the background of the image is white", "main site. You can check out the ads that have met the threshold", "the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have", "show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything", "[1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything else to the", "the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images", "the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the", "join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will", "newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not", "subject matter of the community, but to the current status of the community.", "against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or", "information and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for", "of Community Promotion Ads! Let’s refresh these for the coming year :) ###", "rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the", "it a new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery", "And with the new year, as usual, comes a new iteration of *Community", "the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be", "up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this", "campus story blogs cool events or conferences * anything else your community", "in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community,", "ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very", "Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB * If the background of", "things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just", "the community, but to the current status of the community. We reset the", "on the site. For example, you might promote the following things: * the", "add anything else to the body of the post. If you want to", "site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting", "anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for", "new iteration of Community Promotion Ads*! Let’s refresh these for the coming year", "every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things", "there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ###", "How does it work? The answers you post to this question must* conform", "refresh these for the coming year :) ### What are Community Promotion Ads?", "this question must conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored.", "file size of 150 KB * If the background of the image is", "out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in", "will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads", "or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to be", "150 KB * If the background of the image is white or partially", "reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have", "while other things will wane to allow for new faces to show up.", "the subject matter of the community, but to the current status of the", "must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. ", "will be shown on the main site. You can check out the ads", "usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow for new", "questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements,", "on the main site. You can check out the ads that have met", "yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some", "that will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The", "The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged", "is white or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if", "### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold* an answer must meet", "1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is", "previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the", "250 pixels, or double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through", "and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those", "December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from", "valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it is a", "our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No", "is for future visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems", "in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url", "if high DPI. Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur)", "future visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems important. This", "tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this", "example, you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account ", "of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The", "high DPI. Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) ", "question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\")", "those already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do", "have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer", "In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills", "the site. For example, you might promote the following things: the site's", "* Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be", "be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file", "on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question", "or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The", "functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the", "DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must", "you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic", "community and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads", "(2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum", "Community Promotion Ads*! Let’s refresh these for the coming year :) ### What", "discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be", "resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already", "and will continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost", "It may be helpful to give it a new face in the process,", "year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose", "[2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything else to the body of", "cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable to the community", "or double that if high DPI. Must be hosted through our standard", "* academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events", "maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow for", "Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that", "the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of", "if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score", "purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps", "ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other", "usual, comes a new iteration of Community Promotion Ads*! Let’s refresh these for", "and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out", "the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads?", "Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up", "This is a method for the community to control what gets promoted to", "before it will be shown on the main site. You can check out", "services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to", "PNG No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150", "process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale", "story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community would", "Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness", "form with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that", "always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In", "promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle.", "that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if", "for the coming year :) ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion", "show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old", "the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required", "give it a new face in the process, so as to prevent the", "stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers", "very valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it is", "else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future", "to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services", "comes a new iteration of Community Promotion Ads! Let’s refresh these for the", "Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements", "You can check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic", "in The goal is for future visitors to find out about the stuff", "the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads", "to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep", "it is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to", "faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and", "from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is very valuable", "to your own community's interests, both for those already in the community and", "Let’s refresh these for the coming year :) ### What are Community Promotion", "Threshold There is a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6)", "that are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already in", "enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form", "The goal is for future visitors to find out about the stuff your", "have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control", "iteration of Community Promotion Ads! Let’s refresh these for the coming year :)", "be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a", "something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged", "All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show", "after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you", "meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the main site. You", "particular service or ad is very valuable to the community and will continue", "interesting campus story blogs cool events or conferences * anything else your", "so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful", "year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will", "material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the", "have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a", "is a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before it", "does it work? The answers you post to this question must conform to", "that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image uploader", "the years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces to", "out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click stats [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/ads/display/4407).", "be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]:", "matter of the community, but to the current status of the community. We", "these for the coming year :) ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community", "community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to", ":) ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements", "of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to this", "### How does it work? The answers you post to this question must", "are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ###", "http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add anything else to the body of the", "reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad", "post to this question must* conform to the following rules, or they will", "site. You can check out the ads that have met the threshold with", "KB * If the background of the image is white or partially white,", "1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to", "[![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not", "you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that if high", "ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads", "face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad", "answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements The image", "but to the current status of the community. We reset the ads once", "Promotion Ads*! Let’s refresh these for the coming year :) ### What are", "enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion", "or PNG No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of", "will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose", "own community's interests, both for those already in the community and those yet", "events or conferences anything else your community would genuinely be interested in", "tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also", "the community and will continue to be so, it is a good idea", "of the post*. If you want to discuss something, do it in the", "is very valuable to the community and will continue to be so, it", "We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads", "for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to", "community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous", "Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site,", "the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure.", "idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new", "will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have Community", "to promote information and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests,", "the ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but", "it will be shown on the main site. You can check out the", "do not add anything else to the body of the post. If you", "following things: the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources ", "account academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool", "``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do", "control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might", "The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a", "be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ```", "ad is very valuable to the community and will continue to be so,", "a method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on", "No animated GIFs Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB ", "threshold* an answer must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on", "the current status of the community. We reset the ads once a year,", "* anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is", "of the image is white or partially white, there must be a 1px", "magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality", "* the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus", "to find out about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves", "for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate", "status of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December.", "with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling", "to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must always", "the image is white or partially white, there must be a 1px border", "is a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give", "on file size of 150 KB * If the background of the image", "conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested in The goal", "the main site. You can check out the ads that have met the", "things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting", "your community would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors", "to not just the subject matter of the community, but to the current", "the coming year :) ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads", "your community deems important. This also serves as a way to promote information", "ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads relevant", "process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the", "not add anything else to the body of the post. If you want", "a new face in the process, so as to prevent the imagery of", "allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps", "year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting an", "of 150 KB If the background of the image is white or", "an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular service or ad is", "your own community's interests, both for those already in the community and those", "also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements", "also serves as a way to promote information and resources that are relevant", "prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of", "this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ###", "the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting will", "on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please do not add anything else", "to the current status of the community. We reset the ads once a", "and those yet to join. ### Why do we reset the ads every", "just the subject matter of the community, but to the current status of", "as usual, comes a new iteration of Community Promotion Ads*! Let’s refresh these", "to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should", "of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above", "for those already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why", "purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are", "this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and", "so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after", "accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to be", "year of exposure. ### How does it work? The answers you post to", "do it in the comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with", "the ads once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no", "Must be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) Must be GIF", "above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must", "pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements ", "high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold", "This helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the", "a good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it", "relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already in the community", "the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the", "requirements The image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels,", "Ads*! Let’s refresh these for the coming year :) ### What are Community", "The answers you post to this question must* conform to the following rules,", "do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community", "would genuinely be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find", "goal is for future visitors to find out about the stuff your community", " If the background of the image is white or partially white, there", "and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do", "relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but to the", "2019 is here! And with the new year, as usual, comes a new", "as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting stale after a", "promote information and resources that are relevant to your own community's interests, both", "or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI)", "of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How", "no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If a particular", "the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create", "you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question", "to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you", "find out about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as", "Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the", "helpful to give it a new face in the process, so as to", "### Why do we reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain", "provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why", "the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]:", "exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url", "must conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All", "good idea to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a", "white or partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high", "year, as usual, comes a new iteration of Community Promotion Ads! Let’s refresh", "be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold", "### Image requirements * The image that you create must be 300 x", "the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be", "surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold an answer", "If the background of the image is white or partially white, there must", "\"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of the", "[community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to enabling the functionality of", "from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work?", "standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated", "There is a minimum score threshold an answer must meet (currently 6) before", "is here! And with the new year, as usual, comes a new iteration", "promote the following things: * the site's twitter account * academic websites and", "keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject matter", "be helpful to give it a new face in the process, so as", "out about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a", "or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact", "what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote", "to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year", "* Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB * If the background", "What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will", "### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for", "work? The answers you post to this question must conform to the following", "their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for newer things. This", "tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition to", "the new year, as usual, comes a new iteration of Community Promotion Ads!", "about the stuff your community deems important. This also serves as a way", "method for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the", "* No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB", "main site, in the right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the", "conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers", "to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add", "will maintain usefulness over the years, while other things will wane to allow", "important. This also serves as a way to promote information and resources that", "be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag. In addition", "must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions tagged 'community-ads'\") tag.", "already in the community and those yet to join. ### Why do we", "Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control what gets", "anything else to the body of the post. If you want to discuss", "new year, as usual, comes a new iteration of Community Promotion Ads*! Let’s", "GIF or PNG No animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size", "The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements", "imagery of the ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ###", "websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences", "Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the", "once a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against", "answers you post to this question must conform to the following rules, or", "through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG ", "shown on the main site. You can check out the ads that have", "that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher ads for", "ads have no restrictions against reposting an ad from a previous cycle. If", "question must* conform to the following rules, or they will be ignored. 1.", "with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The image that you", "image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double that", "This also serves as a way to promote information and resources that are", "must meet (currently 6) before it will be shown on the main site.", "Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to control what", "to give it a new face in the process, so as to prevent", "advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right sidebar.", "ad from getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it", "must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score", "every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their", "academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs * cool events or", "background of the image is white or partially white, there must be a", "things will wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the", "double that if high DPI. * Must be hosted through our standard image", "gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the", "wane to allow for new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every", "image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or PNG * No animated GIFs", "fresher ads for newer things. This helps keep the material in the ads", "site's twitter account * academic websites and resources * interesting campus story blogs", "to enabling the functionality of the advertisements, this tag also pre-fills the answer", "be interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out about", "animated GIFs * Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB * If", "shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method", "comments. 2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show", "repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new face in", "for the community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site.", "Ads? This is a method for the community to control what gets promoted", "continue to be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It", "the answer form with the above required form. ### Image requirements * The", "want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2. The question must", "should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2]", "of the community, but to the current status of the community. We reset", "up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads", "partially white, there must be a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding", "helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served their purpose to", "following rules, or they will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in", "be hosted through our standard image uploader (imgur) * Must be GIF or", "form. ### Image requirements * The image that you create must be 300", "ads relevant to not just the subject matter of the community, but to", "ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline", "coming year :) ### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are", "promoted to visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following", "2. The question must always be tagged with the magic [community-ads](/questions/tagged/community-ads \"show questions", "ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows old ads that have served", "body of the post*. If you want to discuss something, do it in", "community, but to the current status of the community. We reset the ads", "of: ``` [![Tagline to show on mouseover][1]][2] [1]: http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please", "old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for fresher", "The image that you create must be 300 x 250 pixels, or double", "current status of the community. We reset the ads once a year, every", "Image requirements The image that you create must be 300 x 250", "new faces to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this,", "allows old ads that have served their purpose to be cycled out for", "is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided, and community voting", "it work? The answers you post to this question must conform to the", "of this question is the vetting process. Images of the advertisements are provided,", "voting will enable the advertisements to be shown. ### Why do we have", "a year, every December. The community promotion ads have no restrictions against reposting", "it. It may be helpful to give it a new face in the", "will be ignored. 1. All answers should be in the exact form of:", "post*. If you want to discuss something, do it in the comments. 2.", "border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a", "not just the subject matter of the community, but to the current status", "reset the ads every year? Some services will maintain usefulness over the years,", "site. For example, you might promote the following things: the site's twitter", "visitors on the site. For example, you might promote the following things: ", "``` Please do not add anything else to the body of the post.", " interesting campus story blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else", "advertisements are provided, and community voting will enable the advertisements to be shown.", "check out the ads that have met the threshold with basic click stats", "to be shown. ### Why do we have Community Promotion Ads? This is", "right sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of", "the community. We reset the ads once a year, every December. The community", "are relevant to your own community's interests, both for those already in the", "6) before it will be shown on the main site. You can check", "visitors to find out about the stuff your community deems important. This also", "cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely be interested", "http://image-url [2]: http://clickthrough-url ``` Please *do not add anything else to the body", "GIFs Absolute limit on file size of 150 KB * If the", "the process, so as to prevent the imagery of the ad from getting", "a 1px border (2px if high DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There", "to be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may", "tag also pre-fills the answer form with the above required form. ### Image", "you post to this question must conform to the following rules, or they", "helps keep the material in the ads relevant to not just the subject", "For example, you might promote the following things: * the site's twitter account", "answers should be in the exact form of: ``` [![Tagline to show on", "interested in The goal is for future visitors to find out about the", "to the community and will continue to be so, it is a good", "to show up. Resetting the ads every year helps accommodate this, and allows", "DPI) surrounding it. ### Score Threshold There is a minimum score threshold* an", "to repost it. It may be helpful to give it a new face", "community to control what gets promoted to visitors on the site. For example,", "over the years, while other things will wane to allow for new faces", "may be helpful to give it a new face in the process, so", "blogs * cool events or conferences * anything else your community would genuinely", "sidebar. The purpose of this question is the vetting process. Images of the", "getting stale after a year of exposure. ### How does it work? The", "we have Community Promotion Ads? This is a method for the community to", "be so, it is a good idea to repost it. It may be", "with the new year, as usual, comes a new iteration of *Community Promotion", "the following things: the site's twitter account * academic websites and resources", "deems important*. This also serves as a way to promote information and resources", "### What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that" ]
[ "is true for downvotes too (though it seems like we downvote less on", "downvotes too (though it seems like we downvote less on this SE than", "This is to share a case study about the \"fastest gun in the", "the top-rated answer gets a huge bias. [For that matter, I've seen similar", "the community already decided not to? The questions I linked seemed open to", "and I all submitted answers on literally the same minute. * Buffy's answer", "neither of us over edited our answers, this is a clear illustration that", "are a sure way to discourage new users. We've discussed this before, but", "the first few hours, or is there simply nothing that can be done", "first few hours, or is there simply nothing that can be done without", "displayed first, despite having fewer votes. The gap quickly began to shrink, and", "users. We've discussed this before, but I guess my questions are: * What", "questions are: * What could we do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions like", "totals for the first few hours, or is there simply nothing that can", "my questions are: * What could we do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions", "be read * This affects new users who can't even comment yet ", "to be read This affects new users who can't even comment yet", "others), and arbitrary downvotes are a sure way to discourage new users. We've", "about the \"fastest gun in the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and", "like 100-60. Our answers are very similar, so it's a bit strange that", "voting -- hard to stop the close train once it gets rolling --", "community already decided not to? The questions I linked seemed open to such", "yet * As Buffy points out, the same is true for downvotes too", "less on this SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes are a sure way", "hours, or is there simply nothing that can be done without getting the", "write entirely new code? * If we do have the power to make", "to? The questions I linked seemed open to such changes, but nothing happened.", "about my imaginary points, but it does seem like an obvious weakness: ", "us over edited our answers, this is a clear illustration that the top-rated", "downvotes are a sure way to discourage new users. We've discussed this before,", "my answer, meaning that my answer is displayed first, despite having fewer votes.", "answers are very similar, so it's a bit strange that there was such", "of us over edited our answers, this is a clear illustration that the", "too (though it seems like we downvote less on this SE than others),", "have the power to make such changes, has the community already decided not", "This affects new users who can't even comment yet As Buffy points", "true for downvotes too (though it seems like we downvote less on this", "solutions like hiding the vote totals for the first few hours, or is", "Guisd, and I all submitted answers on literally the same minute. * Buffy's", "answers, this is a clear illustration that the top-rated answer gets a huge", "unlikely to be read * This affects new users who can't even comment", "new code? * If we do have the power to make such changes,", "we downvote less on this SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes are a", "gets rolling -- but that's a separate topic.] Of course, I don't particularly", "gets a huge bias. [For that matter, I've seen similar behavior in close", "discourage new users. We've discussed this before, but I guess my questions are:", "OP accepted my answer, meaning that my answer is displayed first, despite having", "first, despite having fewer votes. The gap quickly began to shrink, and a", "quickly began to shrink, and a few days later, I am ahead by", "answer gets a huge bias. [For that matter, I've seen similar behavior in", "entirely new code? * If we do have the power to make such", "the vote totals for the first few hours, or is there simply nothing", "illustration that the top-rated answer gets a huge bias. [For that matter, I've", "a clear illustration that the top-rated answer gets a huge bias. [For that", "[here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and", "days later, I am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither of us over", "downvote less on this SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes are a sure", "obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted after ~10 votes are in are unlikely", "The gap quickly began to shrink, and a few days later, I am", "on this SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes are a sure way to", "broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events was: * Buffy, Guisd,", "separate topic.] Of course, I don't particularly care about my imaginary points, but", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and I all", "strange that there was such a difference (I blame the dog picture...). ", "fewer votes. The gap quickly began to shrink, and a few days later,", "and a few days later, I am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither", "support solutions like hiding the vote totals for the first few hours, or", "a separate topic.] Of course, I don't particularly care about my imaginary points,", "simply nothing that can be done without getting the powers that be to", "particularly care about my imaginary points, but it does seem like an obvious", "power to make such changes, has the community already decided not to? The", "(though it seems like we downvote less on this SE than others), and", "piled on. Within a ~day, he was ahead by 40 votes; I think", "-- hard to stop the close train once it gets rolling -- but", "am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither of us over edited our answers,", "score was something like 100-60. Our answers are very similar, so it's a", "SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes are a sure way to discourage new", "the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation)", "in are unlikely to be read This affects new users who can't", "by 40 votes; I think the score was something like 100-60. Our answers", "changes, has the community already decided not to? The questions I linked seemed", "on. Within a ~day, he was ahead by 40 votes; I think the", "Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and from there people piled on. Within a", "gap quickly began to shrink, and a few days later, I am ahead", "Since neither of us over edited our answers, this is a clear illustration", "already decided not to? The questions I linked seemed open to such changes,", "I don't particularly care about my imaginary points, but it does seem like", "Within a ~day, he was ahead by 40 votes; I think the score", "that be to write entirely new code? * If we do have the", "meaning that my answer is displayed first, despite having fewer votes. The gap", "seems like we downvote less on this SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes", "does seem like an obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted after ~10 votes", "over edited our answers, this is a clear illustration that the top-rated answer", "it seems like we downvote less on this SE than others), and arbitrary", "people piled on. Within a ~day, he was ahead by 40 votes; I", "very similar, so it's a bit strange that there was such a difference", "later, I am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither of us over edited", "100-60. Our answers are very similar, so it's a bit strange that there", "As Buffy points out, the same is true for downvotes too (though it", "I think the score was something like 100-60. Our answers are very similar,", "he was ahead by 40 votes; I think the score was something like", "submitted after ~10 votes are in are unlikely to be read * This", "Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events", "it's a bit strange that there was such a difference (I blame the", "discussed this before, but I guess my questions are: * What could we", "bit strange that there was such a difference (I blame the dog picture...).", "are unlikely to be read * This affects new users who can't even", "even comment yet * As Buffy points out, the same is true for", "on literally the same minute. * Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and from", "topic.] Of course, I don't particularly care about my imaginary points, but it", "votes are in are unlikely to be read * This affects new users", "getting the powers that be to write entirely new code? * If we", "for downvotes too (though it seems like we downvote less on this SE", "hiding the vote totals for the first few hours, or is there simply", "If we do have the power to make such changes, has the community", "for the first few hours, or is there simply nothing that can be", "to stop the close train once it gets rolling -- but that's a", "can't even comment yet * As Buffy points out, the same is true", "that there was such a difference (I blame the dog picture...). * Then,", "* Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning that my answer is displayed first,", "out, the same is true for downvotes too (though it seems like we", "is displayed first, despite having fewer votes. The gap quickly began to shrink,", "or is there simply nothing that can be done without getting the powers", "are: * What could we do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions like hiding", "few hours, or is there simply nothing that can be done without getting", "answer, meaning that my answer is displayed first, despite having fewer votes. The", "was such a difference (I blame the dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted", "few days later, I am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither of us", "a case study about the \"fastest gun in the west\" issue discussed on", "-- but that's a separate topic.] Of course, I don't particularly care about", "such changes, has the community already decided not to? The questions I linked", "to write entirely new code? * If we do have the power to", "than others), and arbitrary downvotes are a sure way to discourage new users.", "* If we do have the power to make such changes, has the", "the same is true for downvotes too (though it seems like we downvote", "Buffy points out, the same is true for downvotes too (though it seems", "don't particularly care about my imaginary points, but it does seem like an", "Of course, I don't particularly care about my imaginary points, but it does", "so it's a bit strange that there was such a difference (I blame", "that's a separate topic.] Of course, I don't particularly care about my imaginary", "weakness: * Better answers submitted after ~10 votes are in are unlikely to", "like an obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted after ~10 votes are in", "arbitrary downvotes are a sure way to discourage new users. We've discussed this", "points, but it does seem like an obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted", "to share a case study about the \"fastest gun in the west\" issue", "can be done without getting the powers that be to write entirely new", "think the score was something like 100-60. Our answers are very similar, so", "mechanically? Does SE support solutions like hiding the vote totals for the first", "and from there people piled on. Within a ~day, he was ahead by", "votes. The gap quickly began to shrink, and a few days later, I", "events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted answers on literally the", "[For that matter, I've seen similar behavior in close voting -- hard to", "close voting -- hard to stop the close train once it gets rolling", "the sequence of events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted answers", "on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of", "answers on literally the same minute. * Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and", "ahead by 40 votes; I think the score was something like 100-60. Our", "~10 votes are in are unlikely to be read * This affects new", "Our answers are very similar, so it's a bit strange that there was", "are very similar, so it's a bit strange that there was such a", "a difference (I blame the dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted my answer,", "this SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes are a sure way to discourage", "* This affects new users who can't even comment yet * As Buffy", "picture...). * Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning that my answer is displayed", "stop the close train once it gets rolling -- but that's a separate", "~day, he was ahead by 40 votes; I think the score was something", "without getting the powers that be to write entirely new code? * If", "comment yet * As Buffy points out, the same is true for downvotes", "make such changes, has the community already decided not to? The questions I", "that can be done without getting the powers that be to write entirely", "and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events was: ", " Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted answers on literally the same minute.", "\"fastest gun in the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly", "from there people piled on. Within a ~day, he was ahead by 40", "an obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted after ~10 votes are in are", "immediately upvoted, and from there people piled on. Within a ~day, he was", "* As Buffy points out, the same is true for downvotes too (though", "seen similar behavior in close voting -- hard to stop the close train", "has the community already decided not to? The questions I linked seemed open", "it does seem like an obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted after ~10", "similar, so it's a bit strange that there was such a difference (I", "west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question,", "share a case study about the \"fastest gun in the west\" issue discussed", "sure way to discourage new users. We've discussed this before, but I guess", "to make such changes, has the community already decided not to? The questions", "something like 100-60. Our answers are very similar, so it's a bit strange", "are in are unlikely to be read * This affects new users who", "decided not to? The questions I linked seemed open to such changes, but", "upvoted, and from there people piled on. Within a ~day, he was ahead", "216-205. Since neither of us over edited our answers, this is a clear", "What could we do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions like hiding the vote", "users who can't even comment yet * As Buffy points out, the same", "once it gets rolling -- but that's a separate topic.] Of course, I", "dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning that my answer is", "like hiding the vote totals for the first few hours, or is there", "discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence", "in the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On", "affects new users who can't even comment yet * As Buffy points out,", "we do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions like hiding the vote totals for", "there people piled on. Within a ~day, he was ahead by 40 votes;", "my answer is displayed first, despite having fewer votes. The gap quickly began", "but I guess my questions are: * What could we do, mechanically? Does", "a few days later, I am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither of", "behavior in close voting -- hard to stop the close train once it", "of events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted answers on literally", "ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither of us over edited our answers, this", "having fewer votes. The gap quickly began to shrink, and a few days", "votes; I think the score was something like 100-60. Our answers are very", "literally the same minute. * Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and from there", "answers submitted after ~10 votes are in are unlikely to be read ", "SE support solutions like hiding the vote totals for the first few hours,", "was ahead by 40 votes; I think the score was something like 100-60.", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events was:", "all submitted answers on literally the same minute. Buffy's answer was immediately", "by 10, 216-205. Since neither of us over edited our answers, this is", "be to write entirely new code? * If we do have the power", "same minute. * Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and from there people piled", "but that's a separate topic.] Of course, I don't particularly care about my", "powers that be to write entirely new code? * If we do have", "points out, the same is true for downvotes too (though it seems like", "this before, but I guess my questions are: * What could we do,", "way to discourage new users. We've discussed this before, but I guess my", "we do have the power to make such changes, has the community already", "was immediately upvoted, and from there people piled on. Within a ~day, he", "Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning that my answer is displayed first, despite", "train once it gets rolling -- but that's a separate topic.] Of course,", "my imaginary points, but it does seem like an obvious weakness: * Better", "I all submitted answers on literally the same minute. * Buffy's answer was", "same is true for downvotes too (though it seems like we downvote less", "is a clear illustration that the top-rated answer gets a huge bias. [For", "40 votes; I think the score was something like 100-60. Our answers are", "the close train once it gets rolling -- but that's a separate topic.]", "is to share a case study about the \"fastest gun in the west\"", "do have the power to make such changes, has the community already decided", "read * This affects new users who can't even comment yet * As", "* Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and from there people piled on. Within", "issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the", "more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem). On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events was: * Buffy,", "who can't even comment yet * As Buffy points out, the same is", "gun in the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more broadly [here](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/9731/fastest-gun-in-the-west-problem).", "the same minute. * Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and from there people", "matter, I've seen similar behavior in close voting -- hard to stop the", "care about my imaginary points, but it does seem like an obvious weakness:", "hard to stop the close train once it gets rolling -- but that's", "after ~10 votes are in are unlikely to be read * This affects", "new users. We've discussed this before, but I guess my questions are: ", "submitted answers on literally the same minute. Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted,", "before, but I guess my questions are: * What could we do, mechanically?", "a bit strange that there was such a difference (I blame the dog", "code? * If we do have the power to make such changes, has", "a huge bias. [For that matter, I've seen similar behavior in close voting", "to discourage new users. We've discussed this before, but I guess my questions", "course, I don't particularly care about my imaginary points, but it does seem", "We've discussed this before, but I guess my questions are: * What could", "Does SE support solutions like hiding the vote totals for the first few", "the \"fastest gun in the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827) and more", "difference (I blame the dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning", "began to shrink, and a few days later, I am ahead by 10,", "that the top-rated answer gets a huge bias. [For that matter, I've seen", "case study about the \"fastest gun in the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE", "our answers, this is a clear illustration that the top-rated answer gets a", "guess my questions are: * What could we do, mechanically? Does SE support", "it gets rolling -- but that's a separate topic.] Of course, I don't", "new users who can't even comment yet * As Buffy points out, the", "the score was something like 100-60. Our answers are very similar, so it's", "huge bias. [For that matter, I've seen similar behavior in close voting --", "10, 216-205. Since neither of us over edited our answers, this is a", "I guess my questions are: * What could we do, mechanically? Does SE", "the dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning that my answer", "do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions like hiding the vote totals for the", "clear illustration that the top-rated answer gets a huge bias. [For that matter,", "despite having fewer votes. The gap quickly began to shrink, and a few", "* What could we do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions like hiding the", "answer is displayed first, despite having fewer votes. The gap quickly began to", "but it does seem like an obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted after", "in close voting -- hard to stop the close train once it gets", "like we downvote less on this SE than others), and arbitrary downvotes are", "bias. [For that matter, I've seen similar behavior in close voting -- hard", "there simply nothing that can be done without getting the powers that be", "sequence of events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted answers on", "minute. * Buffy's answer was immediately upvoted, and from there people piled on.", "(I blame the dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning that", "be done without getting the powers that be to write entirely new code?", "there was such a difference (I blame the dog picture...). * Then, OP", "I've seen similar behavior in close voting -- hard to stop the close", "top-rated answer gets a huge bias. [For that matter, I've seen similar behavior", "close train once it gets rolling -- but that's a separate topic.] Of", "such a difference (I blame the dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted my", "answer was immediately upvoted, and from there people piled on. Within a ~day,", "shrink, and a few days later, I am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since", "and arbitrary downvotes are a sure way to discourage new users. We've discussed", "vote totals for the first few hours, or is there simply nothing that", "that my answer is displayed first, despite having fewer votes. The gap quickly", "not to? The questions I linked seemed open to such changes, but nothing", "similar behavior in close voting -- hard to stop the close train once", "a sure way to discourage new users. We've discussed this before, but I", "nothing that can be done without getting the powers that be to write", "blame the dog picture...). * Then, OP accepted my answer, meaning that my", "that matter, I've seen similar behavior in close voting -- hard to stop", "could we do, mechanically? Does SE support solutions like hiding the vote totals", "to shrink, and a few days later, I am ahead by 10, 216-205.", "edited our answers, this is a clear illustration that the top-rated answer gets", "study about the \"fastest gun in the west\" issue discussed on Academia.SE [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question/3827#3827)", "On [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123593/in-a-yes-no-question-student-gives-the-right-answer-and-a-wrong-explanation) question, the sequence of events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and I", "is there simply nothing that can be done without getting the powers that", "* Better answers submitted after ~10 votes are in are unlikely to be", "Better answers submitted after ~10 votes are in are unlikely to be read", "rolling -- but that's a separate topic.] Of course, I don't particularly care", "the power to make such changes, has the community already decided not to?", "imaginary points, but it does seem like an obvious weakness: * Better answers", "question, the sequence of events was: * Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted", "was something like 100-60. Our answers are very similar, so it's a bit", "I am ahead by 10, 216-205. Since neither of us over edited our", "seem like an obvious weakness: * Better answers submitted after ~10 votes are", "a ~day, he was ahead by 40 votes; I think the score was", "done without getting the powers that be to write entirely new code? ", "this is a clear illustration that the top-rated answer gets a huge bias.", "was: Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted answers on literally the same", "accepted my answer, meaning that my answer is displayed first, despite having fewer", "the powers that be to write entirely new code? * If we do", "Buffy, Guisd, and I all submitted answers on literally the same minute. *" ]
[ "see the answer box. I have 101 reputation here, but there isn't supposed", "extra restrictions because it's a hot question or because there are already lots", "101 posted this comment, implying that they're having the same problem: \"I don't", "see answers from people with 41 and 17. Are there extra restrictions because", "else with reputation = 101 posted this comment, implying that they're having the", "disrespect if I omit my gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the", "was interested in posting an answer, but I don't see the answer box.", "is just the association bonus? That doesn't count towards answering protected questions, but", "posting answers. I also see answers from people with 41 and 17. Are", "the answer box. I have 101 reputation here, but there isn't supposed to", "just the association bonus? That doesn't count towards answering protected questions, but the", "also see answers from people with 41 and 17. Are there extra restrictions", "if I omit my gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot", "answer, but I don't see the answer box. I have 101 reputation here,", "supposed to be a reputation minimum for posting answers. I also see answers", "having the same problem: \"I don't seem to have the permissions, so I'll", "that they're having the same problem: \"I don't seem to have the permissions,", "the Hot Questions list. I was interested in posting an answer, but I", "a hot question or because there are already lots of answers (13)? Someone", "41 and 17. Are there extra restrictions because it's a hot question or", "same problem: \"I don't seem to have the permissions, so I'll comment my", "(13)? Someone else with reputation = 101 posted this comment, implying that they're", "\"I don't seem to have the permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\" Is", "in question is not protected, at least not when I view it: [![enter", "restrictions because it's a hot question or because there are already lots of", "don't seem to have the permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\" Is it", "answers (13)? Someone else with reputation = 101 posted this comment, implying that", "reputation minimum for posting answers. I also see answers from people with 41", "have the permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\" Is it because most of", "I also see answers from people with 41 and 17. Are there extra", "reputation = 101 posted this comment, implying that they're having the same problem:", "I was interested in posting an answer, but I don't see the answer", "I omit my gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions", "because there are already lots of answers (13)? Someone else with reputation =", "here, but there isn't supposed to be a reputation minimum for posting answers.", "because most of my reputation is just the association bonus? That doesn't count", "conveying disrespect if I omit my gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through", "conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list. I was interested in posting an", "Hot Questions list. I was interested in posting an answer, but I don't", "I found [Am I conveying disrespect if I omit my gender pronoun from", "through the Hot Questions list. I was interested in posting an answer, but", "in posting an answer, but I don't see the answer box. I have", "so I'll comment my answer.\" Is it because most of my reputation is", "already lots of answers (13)? Someone else with reputation = 101 posted this", "an answer, but I don't see the answer box. I have 101 reputation", "I have 101 reputation here, but there isn't supposed to be a reputation", "reputation here, but there isn't supposed to be a reputation minimum for posting", "comment my answer.\" Is it because most of my reputation is just the", "with 41 and 17. Are there extra restrictions because it's a hot question", "is not protected, at least not when I view it: [![enter image description", "posted this comment, implying that they're having the same problem: \"I don't seem", "or because there are already lots of answers (13)? Someone else with reputation", "17. Are there extra restrictions because it's a hot question or because there", "because it's a hot question or because there are already lots of answers", "the permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\" Is it because most of my", "I conveying disrespect if I omit my gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag)", "posting an answer, but I don't see the answer box. I have 101", "with reputation = 101 posted this comment, implying that they're having the same", "omit my gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list.", "[Am I conveying disrespect if I omit my gender pronoun from a conference", "a reputation minimum for posting answers. I also see answers from people with", "from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list. I was interested in", "there extra restrictions because it's a hot question or because there are already", "it's a hot question or because there are already lots of answers (13)?", "implying that they're having the same problem: \"I don't seem to have the", "bonus? That doesn't count towards answering protected questions, but the question in question", "nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list. I was interested in posting an answer,", "but the question in question is not protected, at least not when I", "not protected, at least not when I view it: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/uGglt.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/uGglt.png)", "protected questions, but the question in question is not protected, at least not", "don't see the answer box. I have 101 reputation here, but there isn't", "= 101 posted this comment, implying that they're having the same problem: \"I", "seem to have the permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\" Is it because", "question or because there are already lots of answers (13)? Someone else with", "there isn't supposed to be a reputation minimum for posting answers. I also", "of answers (13)? Someone else with reputation = 101 posted this comment, implying", "gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list. I was", "count towards answering protected questions, but the question in question is not protected,", "association bonus? That doesn't count towards answering protected questions, but the question in", "I'll comment my answer.\" Is it because most of my reputation is just", "answering protected questions, but the question in question is not protected, at least", "are already lots of answers (13)? Someone else with reputation = 101 posted", "answer box. I have 101 reputation here, but there isn't supposed to be", "this comment, implying that they're having the same problem: \"I don't seem to", "Are there extra restrictions because it's a hot question or because there are", "That doesn't count towards answering protected questions, but the question in question is", "they're having the same problem: \"I don't seem to have the permissions, so", "to have the permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\" Is it because most", "pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list. I was interested", "there are already lots of answers (13)? Someone else with reputation = 101", "for posting answers. I also see answers from people with 41 and 17.", "answers from people with 41 and 17. Are there extra restrictions because it's", "problem: \"I don't seem to have the permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\"", "people with 41 and 17. Are there extra restrictions because it's a hot", "reputation is just the association bonus? That doesn't count towards answering protected questions,", "questions, but the question in question is not protected, at least not when", "to be a reputation minimum for posting answers. I also see answers from", "have 101 reputation here, but there isn't supposed to be a reputation minimum", "interested in posting an answer, but I don't see the answer box. I", "the question in question is not protected, at least not when I view", "towards answering protected questions, but the question in question is not protected, at", "box. I have 101 reputation here, but there isn't supposed to be a", "of my reputation is just the association bonus? That doesn't count towards answering", "my gender pronoun from a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list. I", "question is not protected, at least not when I view it: [![enter image", "question in question is not protected, at least not when I view it:", "101 reputation here, but there isn't supposed to be a reputation minimum for", "answer.\" Is it because most of my reputation is just the association bonus?", "comment, implying that they're having the same problem: \"I don't seem to have", "isn't supposed to be a reputation minimum for posting answers. I also see", "lots of answers (13)? Someone else with reputation = 101 posted this comment,", "my answer.\" Is it because most of my reputation is just the association", "I don't see the answer box. I have 101 reputation here, but there", "from people with 41 and 17. Are there extra restrictions because it's a", "the same problem: \"I don't seem to have the permissions, so I'll comment", "be a reputation minimum for posting answers. I also see answers from people", "Is it because most of my reputation is just the association bonus? That", "found [Am I conveying disrespect if I omit my gender pronoun from a", "and 17. Are there extra restrictions because it's a hot question or because", "but I don't see the answer box. I have 101 reputation here, but", "Questions list. I was interested in posting an answer, but I don't see", "doesn't count towards answering protected questions, but the question in question is not", "it because most of my reputation is just the association bonus? That doesn't", "the association bonus? That doesn't count towards answering protected questions, but the question", "a conference nametag?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/123994/am-i-conveying-disrespect-if-i-omit-my-gender-pronoun-from-a-conference-nametag) through the Hot Questions list. I was interested in posting", "hot question or because there are already lots of answers (13)? Someone else", "permissions, so I'll comment my answer.\" Is it because most of my reputation", "Someone else with reputation = 101 posted this comment, implying that they're having", "but there isn't supposed to be a reputation minimum for posting answers. I", "answers. I also see answers from people with 41 and 17. Are there", "my reputation is just the association bonus? That doesn't count towards answering protected", "minimum for posting answers. I also see answers from people with 41 and", "list. I was interested in posting an answer, but I don't see the", "most of my reputation is just the association bonus? That doesn't count towards" ]
[ "below. At least for this question, please read the answers first and upvote", "Academia users. To wit, > > For questions you read which have multiple", "answers below. At least for this question, please read the answers first and", "users. To wit, > > For questions you read which have multiple answers,", "much of an upvote biases the first answer to a question gets (the", "\"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, > > For questions you read which have", "other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below. At least for this question, please", "AcademiaSE users to see how much of an upvote biases the first answer", "the first answer to a question gets (the \"fastest gun in the west\"", "a biased (biased towards people who use the meta site) study of AcademiaSE", "question gets (the \"fastest gun in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users.", "for this question, please read the answers first and upvote at least one.)", "\"fastest gun in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, >", "> For questions you read which have multiple answers, do you typically vote", "answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below. At least for this question, please read", "question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased towards people who use the meta site)", "towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased towards", "answer to a question gets (the \"fastest gun in the west\" problem) from", "the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased towards people", "answer before reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below. At least for", "and [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose", "to see how much of an upvote biases the first answer to a", "First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a", "[Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a", "do you typically vote on an answer before reading other answers? (Answer by", "questions you read which have multiple answers, do you typically vote on an", "answers, do you typically vote on an answer before reading other answers? (Answer", "Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607)", "please read the answers first and upvote at least one.) > > >", "west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, > > For questions you", "use the meta site) study of AcademiaSE users to see how much of", "skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased", "an upvote biases the first answer to a question gets (the \"fastest gun", "of an upvote biases the first answer to a question gets (the \"fastest", "read which have multiple answers, do you typically vote on an answer before", "(Answer by up-voting answers below. At least for this question, please read the", "biases the first answer to a question gets (the \"fastest gun in the", "before reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below. At least for this", "vote on an answer before reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below.", "to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased towards people who use the", "answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased towards people who use", "to a question gets (the \"fastest gun in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\"", "this question, please read the answers first and upvote at least one.) >", "biased (biased towards people who use the meta site) study of AcademiaSE users", "users to see how much of an upvote biases the first answer to", "a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased towards people who use the meta", "problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, > > For questions you read", "gets (the \"fastest gun in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To", "by up-voting answers below. At least for this question, please read the answers", "To wit, > > For questions you read which have multiple answers, do", "gun in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, > >", "Motivated by these questions: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed", "least for this question, please read the answers first and upvote at least", "propose a biased (biased towards people who use the meta site) study of", "see how much of an upvote biases the first answer to a question", "site) study of AcademiaSE users to see how much of an upvote biases", "Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I", "reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below. At least for this question,", "For questions you read which have multiple answers, do you typically vote on", "first answer to a question gets (the \"fastest gun in the west\" problem)", "Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to", "which have multiple answers, do you typically vote on an answer before reading", "study of AcademiaSE users to see how much of an upvote biases the", "you read which have multiple answers, do you typically vote on an answer", "the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, > > For questions", "first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased (biased towards people who", "the meta site) study of AcademiaSE users to see how much of an", "a question gets (the \"fastest gun in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia", "(biased towards people who use the meta site) study of AcademiaSE users to", "by these questions: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards", "who use the meta site) study of AcademiaSE users to see how much", "on an answer before reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below. At", "typically vote on an answer before reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers", "meta site) study of AcademiaSE users to see how much of an upvote", "wit, > > For questions you read which have multiple answers, do you", "people who use the meta site) study of AcademiaSE users to see how", "questions: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards the first", "question, please read the answers first and upvote at least one.) > >", "these questions: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards the", "you typically vote on an answer before reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting", "multiple answers, do you typically vote on an answer before reading other answers?", "towards people who use the meta site) study of AcademiaSE users to see", "an answer before reading other answers? (Answer by up-voting answers below. At least", "(the \"fastest gun in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit,", "upvote biases the first answer to a question gets (the \"fastest gun in", "[Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/19607) and [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer", "in the west\" problem) from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, > > For", "upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3826/19607) I propose a biased", "how much of an upvote biases the first answer to a question gets", "I propose a biased (biased towards people who use the meta site) study", "of AcademiaSE users to see how much of an upvote biases the first", "from \"non-random\" Academia users. To wit, > > For questions you read which", "have multiple answers, do you typically vote on an answer before reading other", "up-voting answers below. At least for this question, please read the answers first", "At least for this question, please read the answers first and upvote at", "> > For questions you read which have multiple answers, do you typically" ]
[ "all for questions which ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the", "[understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are", "its core: > > Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own", "them out right now) basically asks: > > I want to pass my", "since I can see four up-votes on it, I was just wondering whether", "a bad question. I was also thinking of casting a close vote, but", "glancing on most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the answers just", "ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249),", "which is why I am posting to the meta, but can't dig them", "(where owning a pink elephant could be any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It", "be seen in many, many other questions. I downvoted the question in question,", "or less elaborated, but always in its core: > > Plagiarism is passing", "passing someone else's work as your own > > > I am all", "am all for questions which ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand", "it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249)", "can't dig them out right now) basically asks: > > I want to", "owning a pink elephant could be any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems", "plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The answer to this question does not really", "could be any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me that this", "a close vote, but none of the reasons seemed to be quite on", "[encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher", "seemed to be quite on the spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's a", "question. I was also thinking of casting a close vote, but none of", "good fit, or worth keeping, but since I can see four up-votes on", "downvoted the question in question, as I think it is a bad question.", "the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your", "that this question (and many other alike) are basically asking: > > Is", "I downvoted the question in question, as I think it is a bad", "site, more or less elaborated, but always in its core: > > Plagiarism", "have seen more similar ones before it, which is why I am posting", "> > Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The answer to this question", "me that this question (and many other alike) are basically asking: > >", "similar ones before it, which is why I am posting to the meta,", "this question does not really contribute anything new to the site, the OP", "recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have seen more similar ones before it,", "believe I have seen more similar ones before it, which is why I", "Ultimately, I don't think it's a good question, good fit, or worth keeping,", "> > Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own > >", "definition of plagiarism numerous times on this site, more or less elaborated, but", "Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The answer to this question does not", "think it is a bad question. I was also thinking of casting a", "I want to pass my friends work as my own, but additionally he", "the site, the OP could have found this information out by glancing on", "the reasons seemed to be quite on the spot. Ultimately, I don't think", "elephant. Is this still plagiarism? > > > (where owning a pink elephant", "> Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The answer to this question does", "out by glancing on most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the", "it's a good question, good fit, or worth keeping, but since I can", "> I am all for questions which ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249),", "pass my friends work as my own, but additionally he owns a pink", "other questions. I downvoted the question in question, as I think it is", "> > > I am all for questions which ask to [understand the", "thinking of casting a close vote, but none of the reasons seemed to", "question, as I think it is a bad question. I was also thinking", "keeping, but since I can see four up-votes on it, I was just", "self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and trying to understand", "posting to the meta, but can't dig them out right now) basically asks:", "importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for the", "this question (and many other alike) are basically asking: > > Is plagiarism", "have found this information out by glancing on most of our `plagiarism` tagged", "are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young", "anything new to the site, the OP could have found this information out", "on the spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's a good question, good fit,", "> > > (where owning a pink elephant* could be any other completely", "question does not really contribute anything new to the site, the OP could", "We have seen the definition of plagiarism numerous times on this site, more", "understand that, or [peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249)", "questions, and all the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's", "can see four up-votes on it, I was just wondering whether this is", "(and I believe I have seen more similar ones before it, which is", "> > I want to pass my friends work as my own, but", "all the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as", "> Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own > > >", "to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or", "information out by glancing on most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all", "is passing someone else's work as your own > > > I am", "seen the definition of plagiarism numerous times on this site, more or less", "But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have seen more similar ones", "(and many other alike) are basically asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism? >", "really contribute anything new to the site, the OP could have found this", "it, which is why I am posting to the meta, but can't dig", "else's work as your own > > > I am all for questions", "or [understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept of", "ones before it, which is why I am posting to the meta, but", "in its core: > > Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your", "> > The answer to this question does not really contribute anything new", "OP could have found this information out by glancing on most of our", "many, many other questions. I downvoted the question in question, as I think", "else's work as your own.\", which can be seen in many, many other", "trying to understand that, or [peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this", "I think it is a bad question. I was also thinking of casting", "involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have seen more", "more similar ones before it, which is why I am posting to the", "a good question, good fit, or worth keeping, but since I can see", "also thinking of casting a close vote, but none of the reasons seemed", "could have found this information out by glancing on most of our `plagiarism`", "your own.\", which can be seen in many, many other questions. I downvoted", "spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's a good question, good fit, or worth", "contribute anything new to the site, the OP could have found this information", "basically asks: > > I want to pass my friends work as my", "It seems to me that this question (and many other alike) are basically", "of casting a close vote, but none of the reasons seemed to be", "plagiarism? > > > The answer to this question does not really contribute", "on most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the answers just elaborate", "\"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own.\", which can be seen", "to the site, the OP could have found this information out by glancing", "by glancing on most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the answers", "and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I", "does not really contribute anything new to the site, the OP could have", "I don't think it's a good question, good fit, or worth keeping, but", "time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and trying to understand that, or [peculiar and", "situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have seen", "many other alike) are basically asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism? > >", "to be quite on the spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's a good", "question (and many other alike) are basically asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism?", "asks: > > I want to pass my friends work as my own,", "additionally he owns a pink elephant. Is this still plagiarism? > > >", "as I think it is a bad question. I was also thinking of", "work as your own > > > I am all for questions which", "new to the site, the OP could have found this information out by", "meta, but can't dig them out right now) basically asks: > > I", "but always in its core: > > Plagiarism is passing someone else's work", "better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as", "the definition of plagiarism numerous times on this site, more or less elaborated,", "the concept of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and", "plagiarism? > > > (where owning a pink elephant could be any other", "I was also thinking of casting a close vote, but none of the", "The answer to this question does not really contribute anything new to the", "> > I am all for questions which ask to [understand the concept", "friends work as my own, but additionally he owns a pink elephant. Is", "am posting to the meta, but can't dig them out right now) basically", "most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the answers just elaborate on", "on it, I was just wondering whether this is really the community opinion.", "elaborated, but always in its core: > > Plagiarism is passing someone else's", "for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and trying to understand that,", "as your own > > > I am all for questions which ask", "pink elephant. Is this still plagiarism? > > > (where owning a pink", "Is this still plagiarism? > > > (where owning a pink elephant could", "better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept", "other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me that this question (and many", "any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me that this question (and", "think it's a good question, good fit, or worth keeping, but since I", "seen in many, many other questions. I downvoted the question in question, as", "your own > > > I am all for questions which ask to", "right now) basically asks: > > I want to pass my friends work", "not really contribute anything new to the site, the OP could have found", "to this question does not really contribute anything new to the site, the", "core: > > Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own >", "but can't dig them out right now) basically asks: > > I want", "now) basically asks: > > I want to pass my friends work as", "see four up-votes on it, I was just wondering whether this is really", "and trying to understand that, or [peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But,", "first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and trying to understand that, or [peculiar", "of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism", "`plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing", "or worth keeping, but since I can see four up-votes on it, I", "passing someone else's work as your own.\", which can be seen in many,", "worth keeping, but since I can see four up-votes on it, I was", "questions. I downvoted the question in question, as I think it is a", "> I want to pass my friends work as my own, but additionally", "that, or [peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and", "still plagiarism? > > > (where owning a pink elephant* could be any", "the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for", "as a young researcher and trying to understand that, or [peculiar and particular", "[understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism", "a young researcher and trying to understand that, or [peculiar and particular situations", "he owns a pink elephant. Is this still plagiarism? > > > (where", "I can see four up-votes on it, I was just wondering whether this", "as my own, but additionally he owns a pink elephant. Is this still", "> (where owning a pink elephant could be any other completely irrelevant reasoning).", "bad question. I was also thinking of casting a close vote, but none", "more or less elaborated, but always in its core: > > Plagiarism is", "answer to this question does not really contribute anything new to the site,", "up-votes on it, I was just wondering whether this is really the community", "fit, or worth keeping, but since I can see four up-votes on it,", "of plagiarism numerous times on this site, more or less elaborated, but always", "but additionally he owns a pink elephant. Is this still plagiarism? > >", "elephant* could be any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me that", "always in its core: > > Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as", "concept of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and trying", "or [peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I", "the meta, but can't dig them out right now) basically asks: > >", "other alike) are basically asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > >", "alike) are basically asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The", "which can be seen in many, many other questions. I downvoted the question", "out right now) basically asks: > > I want to pass my friends", "own > > > I am all for questions which ask to [understand", "questions which ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of", "have seen the definition of plagiarism numerous times on this site, more or", "[peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe", "reasons seemed to be quite on the spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's", "the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering", "why I am posting to the meta, but can't dig them out right", "it is a bad question. I was also thinking of casting a close", "of the reasons seemed to be quite on the spot. Ultimately, I don't", "my friends work as my own, but additionally he owns a pink elephant.", "found this information out by glancing on most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions,", "four up-votes on it, I was just wondering whether this is really the", "but none of the reasons seemed to be quite on the spot. Ultimately,", "basically asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The answer to", "want to pass my friends work as my own, but additionally he owns", "completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me that this question (and many other", "tagged questions, and all the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone", "can be seen in many, many other questions. I downvoted the question in", "the question in question, as I think it is a bad question. I", "seen more similar ones before it, which is why I am posting to", "is passing someone else's work as your own.\", which can be seen in", "elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own.\", which can", "is why I am posting to the meta, but can't dig them out", "just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own.\", which", "close vote, but none of the reasons seemed to be quite on the", "owns a pink elephant. Is this still plagiarism? > > > (where owning", "the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and trying to understand that, or", "I am posting to the meta, but can't dig them out right now)", "quite on the spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's a good question, good", "pink elephant* could be any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me", "irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me that this question (and many other alike)", "dig them out right now) basically asks: > > I want to pass", "but since I can see four up-votes on it, I was just wondering", "be quite on the spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's a good question,", "this information out by glancing on most of our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and", "casting a close vote, but none of the reasons seemed to be quite", "question in question, as I think it is a bad question. I was", "numerous times on this site, more or less elaborated, but always in its", "the OP could have found this information out by glancing on most of", "in question, as I think it is a bad question. I was also", "I believe I have seen more similar ones before it, which is why", "a pink elephant. Is this still plagiarism? > > > (where owning a", "this still plagiarism? > > > (where owning a pink elephant could be", "on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own.\", which can be", "which ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of it", "many other questions. I downvoted the question in question, as I think it", "or are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a", "a pink elephant* could be any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to", "as your own.\", which can be seen in many, many other questions. I", "Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own > > > I", "be any other completely irrelevant reasoning). It seems to me that this question", "> > (where owning a pink elephant* could be any other completely irrelevant", "our `plagiarism` tagged questions, and all the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is", "to understand that, or [peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent", "work as my own, but additionally he owns a pink elephant. Is this", "own, but additionally he owns a pink elephant. Is this still plagiarism? >", "times on this site, more or less elaborated, but always in its core:", "asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The answer to this", "someone else's work as your own.\", which can be seen in many, many", "work as your own.\", which can be seen in many, many other questions.", "is a bad question. I was also thinking of casting a close vote,", "question, good fit, or worth keeping, but since I can see four up-votes", "to me that this question (and many other alike) are basically asking: >", "in many, many other questions. I downvoted the question in question, as I", "this site, more or less elaborated, but always in its core: > >", "to the meta, but can't dig them out right now) basically asks: >", "reasoning). It seems to me that this question (and many other alike) are", "my own, but additionally he owns a pink elephant. Is this still plagiarism?", "was also thinking of casting a close vote, but none of the reasons", "plagiarism numerous times on this site, more or less elaborated, but always in", "I am all for questions which ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or", "the spot. Ultimately, I don't think it's a good question, good fit, or", "concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the", "researcher and trying to understand that, or [peculiar and particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249).", "less elaborated, but always in its core: > > Plagiarism is passing someone", "of self-plagiarism for the first time](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/82437/4249) as a young researcher and trying to", "before it, which is why I am posting to the meta, but can't", "are basically asking: > > Is plagiarism plagiarism? > > > The answer", "> The answer to this question does not really contribute anything new to", "on this site, more or less elaborated, but always in its core: >", "of it better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/60995/4249), or are [encountering the concept of self-plagiarism for the first", "to pass my friends work as my own, but additionally he owns a", "none of the reasons seemed to be quite on the spot. Ultimately, I", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have seen more similar ones before it, which", "I have seen more similar ones before it, which is why I am", "someone else's work as your own > > > I am all for", "answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work as your own.\",", "for questions which ask to [understand the concept better](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/124555/4249), or [understand the importance", "young researcher and trying to understand that, or [peculiar and particular situations involving", "own.\", which can be seen in many, many other questions. I downvoted the", "good question, good fit, or worth keeping, but since I can see four", "plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have seen more similar", "> > > The answer to this question does not really contribute anything", "[this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have seen more similar ones before", "seems to me that this question (and many other alike) are basically asking:", "particular situations involving plagiarism](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/65485/4249). But, [this recent question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/125223/4249) (and I believe I have", "vote, but none of the reasons seemed to be quite on the spot.", "don't think it's a good question, good fit, or worth keeping, but since", "site, the OP could have found this information out by glancing on most", "and all the answers just elaborate on \"Plagiarism is passing someone else's work" ]
[ "low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this the same individual, or a small number", "individuals, who are using \"guest\" as a burner account? Does this violate either", "small number of individuals, who are using \"guest\" as a burner account? Does", "of individuals, who are using \"guest\" as a burner account? Does this violate", "the same individual, or a small number of individuals, who are using \"guest\"", "as a burner account? Does this violate either the terms or community norms", "called \"guest.\" Is this the same individual, or a small number of individuals,", "this the same individual, or a small number of individuals, who are using", "huge number of very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this the same individual,", "a burner account? Does this violate either the terms or community norms of", "same individual, or a small number of individuals, who are using \"guest\" as", "\"guest.\" Is this the same individual, or a small number of individuals, who", "of very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this the same individual, or a", "number of very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this the same individual, or", "users called \"guest.\" Is this the same individual, or a small number of", "seems to be a huge number of very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is", "very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this the same individual, or a small", "using \"guest\" as a burner account? Does this violate either the terms or", "\"guest\" as a burner account? Does this violate either the terms or community", "individual, or a small number of individuals, who are using \"guest\" as a", "a huge number of very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this the same", "to be a huge number of very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this", "who are using \"guest\" as a burner account? Does this violate either the", "a small number of individuals, who are using \"guest\" as a burner account?", "number of individuals, who are using \"guest\" as a burner account? Does this", "be a huge number of very low-rep users called \"guest.\" Is this the", "There seems to be a huge number of very low-rep users called \"guest.\"", "or a small number of individuals, who are using \"guest\" as a burner", "Is this the same individual, or a small number of individuals, who are", "burner account? Does this violate either the terms or community norms of ASE?", "are using \"guest\" as a burner account? Does this violate either the terms" ]
[ "prepare an answer only to have it summarily rejected. Of course, this affects", "it is closed, leaving me no option but to discard my contribution or", "frequently been in the situation of being in the middle of providing an", "an answer only to have it summarily rejected. Of course, this affects frequent", "option but to discard my contribution or hope that the question can be", "that the question can be re-opened. It can be very frustrating to put", "the middle of providing an answer to a question when it is closed,", "be very frustrating to put in the mental effort to prepare an answer", "answer to a question when it is closed, leaving me no option but", "possible to let such \"work in progress\" be entered into the record when", "being in the middle of providing an answer to a question when it", "can be very frustrating to put in the mental effort to prepare an", "It can be very frustrating to put in the mental effort to prepare", "more than others. I wonder if it is possible to let such \"work", "course, this affects frequent contributors more than others. I wonder if it is", "of being in the middle of providing an answer to a question when", "others. I wonder if it is possible to let such \"work in progress\"", "to let such \"work in progress\" be entered into the record when this", "providing an answer to a question when it is closed, leaving me no", "a question when it is closed, leaving me no option but to discard", "is closed, leaving me no option but to discard my contribution or hope", "of providing an answer to a question when it is closed, leaving me", "summarily rejected. Of course, this affects frequent contributors more than others. I wonder", "question when it is closed, leaving me no option but to discard my", "have fairly frequently been in the situation of being in the middle of", "can be re-opened. It can be very frustrating to put in the mental", "but to discard my contribution or hope that the question can be re-opened.", "my contribution or hope that the question can be re-opened. It can be", "frequent contributors more than others. I wonder if it is possible to let", "wonder if it is possible to let such \"work in progress\" be entered", "or hope that the question can be re-opened. It can be very frustrating", "to discard my contribution or hope that the question can be re-opened. It", "hope that the question can be re-opened. It can be very frustrating to", "it is possible to let such \"work in progress\" be entered into the", "it summarily rejected. Of course, this affects frequent contributors more than others. I", "I wonder if it is possible to let such \"work in progress\" be", "the question can be re-opened. It can be very frustrating to put in", "to prepare an answer only to have it summarily rejected. Of course, this", "I have fairly frequently been in the situation of being in the middle", "the situation of being in the middle of providing an answer to a", "question can be re-opened. It can be very frustrating to put in the", "leaving me no option but to discard my contribution or hope that the", "if it is possible to let such \"work in progress\" be entered into", "very frustrating to put in the mental effort to prepare an answer only", "when it is closed, leaving me no option but to discard my contribution", "contributors more than others. I wonder if it is possible to let such", "this affects frequent contributors more than others. I wonder if it is possible", "in the mental effort to prepare an answer only to have it summarily", "be re-opened. It can be very frustrating to put in the mental effort", "situation of being in the middle of providing an answer to a question", "Of course, this affects frequent contributors more than others. I wonder if it", "no option but to discard my contribution or hope that the question can", "in the middle of providing an answer to a question when it is", "to put in the mental effort to prepare an answer only to have", "only to have it summarily rejected. Of course, this affects frequent contributors more", "affects frequent contributors more than others. I wonder if it is possible to", "discard my contribution or hope that the question can be re-opened. It can", "put in the mental effort to prepare an answer only to have it", "contribution or hope that the question can be re-opened. It can be very", "effort to prepare an answer only to have it summarily rejected. Of course,", "let such \"work in progress\" be entered into the record when this happens.", "is possible to let such \"work in progress\" be entered into the record", "than others. I wonder if it is possible to let such \"work in", "mental effort to prepare an answer only to have it summarily rejected. Of", "in the situation of being in the middle of providing an answer to", "frustrating to put in the mental effort to prepare an answer only to", "to a question when it is closed, leaving me no option but to", "middle of providing an answer to a question when it is closed, leaving", "re-opened. It can be very frustrating to put in the mental effort to", "been in the situation of being in the middle of providing an answer", "rejected. Of course, this affects frequent contributors more than others. I wonder if", "me no option but to discard my contribution or hope that the question", "an answer to a question when it is closed, leaving me no option", "closed, leaving me no option but to discard my contribution or hope that", "fairly frequently been in the situation of being in the middle of providing", "the mental effort to prepare an answer only to have it summarily rejected.", "answer only to have it summarily rejected. Of course, this affects frequent contributors", "have it summarily rejected. Of course, this affects frequent contributors more than others.", "to have it summarily rejected. Of course, this affects frequent contributors more than" ]
[ "you think so, please suggest categories in the answers: * Suggest one category", "because by the time the discussion has reached any sort of consensus, the", "elaborate why.** This naturally makes the most sense for questions that are already", "decide on a case-by-case basis, by answering the question: \"Do we have this", "by a heuristic that takes into account recent visits, answers, and votes. There", "types of question to be HNQs and try to remove them as quickly", "================================== Occasionally, we will remove a question from the HNQs, when there is", "answers: * Suggest one category per answer. * Do not suggest categories of", "the Stack Exchange network that are considered “hot” by a heuristic that takes", "Stack Exchange network that are considered “hot” by a heuristic that takes into", "* Suggest one category per answer. * Do not suggest categories of questions", "at the end of the day we have to decide on a case-by-case", "case-by-case basis, by answering the question: \"Do we have this kind of problem", "higher number of visitors – many of whom are unfamiliar with our site", "or answers for deletion, or flag for closure. What questions should not be", "([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible. After removing a question, we cannot decide that", "answer. * Do not suggest categories of questions that should be closed or", "irreversible. After removing a question, we cannot decide that we want to allow", "HNQ, please flag it for moderator attention and elaborate why. This naturally makes", "being HNQs is a problem. * Remember that at the end of the", "should be removed from the HNQs is not a good idea, because by", "an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to flag it. Please do not do", "we generally do not want to be HNQs? If you think so, please", "be HNQs and try to remove them as quickly as possible. Therefore I", "the respective edits, flag the problematic comments or answers for deletion, or flag", "is irreversible. After removing a question, we cannot decide that we want to", "this? ==================== Having a meta discussion about whether a specific question should be", "its increased exposure leads to considerably higher number of visitors – many of", "of the Stack Exchange network that are considered “hot” by a heuristic that", "Please do not do this for questions that you consider in need of", "a question from the HNQs, when there is a serious problem, and given", "answering the question: \"Do we have this kind of problem on our site?\"", "have this kind of problem on our site?\" Therefore a good rationale is", "a question, we cannot decide that we want to allow it to go", "into account recent visits, answers, and votes. There can be issues when one", "but if you think it is likely that a question will become an", "Provide a rationale why such questions being HNQs is a problem. * Remember", "cannot decide that we want to allow it to go hot again. How", "because its increased exposure leads to considerably higher number of visitors – many", "the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it is likely that a question", "now remove individual questions from the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process", "please flag it for moderator attention and elaborate why. This naturally makes the", "If you think so, please suggest categories in the answers: * Suggest one", "any sort of consensus, the potential damage has probably already been done. So,", "should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove a question from the", "moderator attention and elaborate why. This naturally makes the most sense for questions", "removing a question, we cannot decide that we want to allow it to", "be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove a question from the HNQs, when", "decide that we want to allow it to go hot again. How can", "a good idea, because by the time the discussion has reached any sort", "similar. Instead perform or suggest the respective edits, flag the problematic comments or", "respective edits, flag the problematic comments or answers for deletion, or flag for", "Are there any categories of questions that we generally do not want to", "has probably already been done. So, we moderators have to decide on relatively", "and given their individual nature, some of these problems are unforeseeable. However, we", "many of whom are unfamiliar with our site and our community standards. Moderators", "please suggest categories in the answers: * Suggest one category per answer. ", "votes. There can be issues when one of our questions becomes an HNQ", "a community can agree that we do not want certain types of question", "it is likely that a question will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel", "them as quickly as possible. Therefore I am asking: Are there any categories", "not want to be HNQs?* If you think so, please suggest categories in", "be HNQs?** If you think so, please suggest categories in the answers: ", "with an edit. Provide a rationale why such questions being HNQs is", "exposure leads to considerably higher number of visitors – many of whom are", "question will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to flag it. Please", "of consensus, the potential damage has probably already been done. So, we moderators", "one of our questions becomes an HNQ because its increased exposure leads to", "or can be salvaged with an edit. * Provide a rationale why such", "other sites of the Stack Exchange network that are considered “hot” by a", "rationale why such questions being HNQs is a problem. * Remember that at", "go hot again. How can we use this? ==================== Having a meta discussion", "whether a specific question should be removed from the HNQs is not a", "any categories of questions that we generally do not want to be HNQs?*", "question: \"Do we have this kind of problem on our site?\" Therefore a", "will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to flag it. Please do", "done. So, we moderators have to decide on relatively quickly and on a", " Do not suggest categories of questions that should be closed or can", "whom are unfamiliar with our site and our community standards. Moderators can now", "sidebar featuring from other sites of the Stack Exchange network that are considered", "After removing a question, we cannot decide that we want to allow it", "from the HNQs, when there is a serious problem, and given their individual", "naturally makes the most sense for questions that are already HNQs (which you", "of editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead perform or suggest the respective", "unfamiliar with our site and our community standards. Moderators can now remove individual", "already been done. So, we moderators have to decide on relatively quickly and", "What questions should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove a question", "flag for closure. What questions should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will", "consensus, the potential damage has probably already been done. So, we moderators have", "and votes. There can be issues when one of our questions becomes an", "are unforeseeable. However, we as a community can agree that we do not", "when one of our questions becomes an HNQ because its increased exposure leads", "perform or suggest the respective edits, flag the problematic comments or answers for", "the HNQs, when there is a serious problem, and given their individual nature,", "day we have to decide on a case-by-case basis, by answering the question:", "shouldn’t, feel free to flag it. Please do not do this for questions", "[see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it is likely that", "as a community can agree that we do not want certain types of", "asking: *Are there any categories of questions that we generally* do not want", "Remember that at the end of the day we have to decide on", "on a case-by-case basis whether a question should be removed. If you feel", "Network Questions (HNQ) are questions shown in the bottom right sidebar featuring from", "site and our community standards. Moderators can now remove individual questions from the", "not want certain types of question to be HNQs and try to remove", "process is irreversible. After removing a question, we cannot decide that we want", "should not be an HNQ, please flag it for moderator attention and elaborate", "categories in the answers: * Suggest one category per answer. * Do not", "a rationale why such questions being HNQs is a problem. * Remember that", "Instead perform or suggest the respective edits, flag the problematic comments or answers", "to remove them as quickly as possible. Therefore I am asking: Are there", "not be an HNQ, please flag it for moderator attention and elaborate why.", "questions should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove a question from", "to be HNQs and try to remove them as quickly as possible. Therefore", "time the discussion has reached any sort of consensus, the potential damage has", "can agree that we do not want certain types of question to be", "answers for deletion, or flag for closure. What questions should not be HNQs?", "potential damage has probably already been done. So, we moderators have to decide", "deletion, or flag for closure. What questions should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally,", "attention and elaborate why.** This naturally makes the most sense for questions that", "or suggest the respective edits, flag the problematic comments or answers for deletion,", "questions being HNQs is a problem. * Remember that at the end of", "comments or answers for deletion, or flag for closure. What questions should not", "questions from the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible. After", "given their individual nature, some of these problems are unforeseeable. However, we as", "and elaborate why.** This naturally makes the most sense for questions that are", "kind of problem on our site?\" Therefore a good rationale is more important", "that takes into account recent visits, answers, and votes. There can be issues", "HNQs is not a good idea, because by the time the discussion has", "that should be closed or can be salvaged with an edit. * Provide", "not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove a question from the HNQs,", "closed or can be salvaged with an edit. * Provide a rationale why", "there any categories of questions that we generally do not want to be", "have to decide on relatively quickly and on a case-by-case basis whether a", "remove individual questions from the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). *This process is", "reached any sort of consensus, the potential damage has probably already been done.", "There can be issues when one of our questions becomes an HNQ because", " Remember that at the end of the day we have to decide", "again. How can we use this? ==================== Having a meta discussion about whether", "will remove a question from the HNQs, when there is a serious problem,", "consider in need of editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead perform or", "question from the HNQs, when there is a serious problem, and given their", "on our site?\" Therefore a good rationale is more important than precisely defining", "that a question will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to flag", "questions that should be closed or can be salvaged with an edit. ", "the time the discussion has reached any sort of consensus, the potential damage", "of questions that we generally* do not want to be HNQs?** If you", "generally do not want to be HNQs? If you think so, please suggest", "Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible. After removing a question,", "the question: \"Do we have this kind of problem on our site?\" Therefore", "we want to allow it to go hot again. How can we use", "not do this for questions that you consider in need of editing, cleaning", "or flag for closure. What questions should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we", "be removed. If you feel that any question should not be an HNQ,", "unforeseeable. However, we as a community can agree that we do not want", "a problem. * Remember that at the end of the day we have", "of the day we have to decide on a case-by-case basis, by answering", "in the answers: * Suggest one category per answer. * Do not suggest", "This naturally makes the most sense for questions that are already HNQs (which", "heuristic that takes into account recent visits, answers, and votes. There can be", "is likely that a question will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free", "in the bottom right sidebar featuring from other sites of the Stack Exchange", "can now remove individual questions from the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). *This", "so, please suggest categories in the answers: Suggest one category per answer.", "serious problem, and given their individual nature, some of these problems are unforeseeable.", "for deletion, or flag for closure. What questions should not be HNQs? ==================================", "some of these problems are unforeseeable. However, we as a community can agree", "Questions (HNQ) are questions shown in the bottom right sidebar featuring from other", "it for moderator attention and elaborate why. This naturally makes the most sense", "of questions that should be closed or can be salvaged with an edit.", "an HNQ, please flag it for moderator attention and elaborate why. This naturally", "If you feel that any question should not be an HNQ, please flag", "to go hot again. How can we use this? ==================== Having a meta", "in need of editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead perform or suggest", "am asking: Are there any categories of questions that we generally do not", "specific question should be removed from the HNQs is not a good idea,", "history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it is likely that a question will become", "important than precisely defining the category. * Use votes to indicate agreement or", "when there is a serious problem, and given their individual nature, some of", "damage has probably already been done. So, we moderators have to decide on", "categories of questions that we generally do not want to be HNQs? If", "there is a serious problem, and given their individual nature, some of these", "standards. Moderators can now remove individual questions from the Hot Network Questions list", "moderators have to decide on relatively quickly and on a case-by-case basis whether", "Therefore I am asking: Are there any categories of questions that we generally", "question should not be an HNQ, please flag it for moderator attention and", "we have this kind of problem on our site?\" Therefore a good rationale", "the potential damage has probably already been done. So, we moderators have to", "on relatively quickly and on a case-by-case basis whether a question should be", "HNQ because its increased exposure leads to considerably higher number of visitors –", "with our site and our community standards. Moderators can now remove individual questions", "list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible. After removing a question, we cannot decide", "visits, answers, and votes. There can be issues when one of our questions", "whether a question should be removed. If you feel that any question should", "(which you can now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think", "The mechanics ============= Hot Network Questions (HNQ) are questions shown in the bottom", "is not a good idea, because by the time the discussion has reached", "remove a question from the HNQs, when there is a serious problem, and", "increased exposure leads to considerably higher number of visitors – many of whom", "should be removed. If you feel that any question should not be an", "case-by-case basis whether a question should be removed. If you feel that any", "featuring from other sites of the Stack Exchange network that are considered “hot”", "our questions becomes an HNQ because its increased exposure leads to considerably higher", "Hot Network Questions (HNQ) are questions shown in the bottom right sidebar featuring", "why. This naturally makes the most sense for questions that are already HNQs", "flag the problematic comments or answers for deletion, or flag for closure. What", "edit. * Provide a rationale why such questions being HNQs is a problem.", "or similar. Instead perform or suggest the respective edits, flag the problematic comments", "agree that we do not want certain types of question to be HNQs", "HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to flag it. Please do not do this", "bottom right sidebar featuring from other sites of the Stack Exchange network that", "idea, because by the time the discussion has reached any sort of consensus,", "a question should be removed. If you feel that any question should not", "any question should not be an HNQ, please flag it for moderator attention", "of our questions becomes an HNQ because its increased exposure leads to considerably", "and on a case-by-case basis whether a question should be removed. If you", "considerably higher number of visitors – many of whom are unfamiliar with our", "leads to considerably higher number of visitors – many of whom are unfamiliar", "categories of questions that should be closed or can be salvaged with an", "sort of consensus, the potential damage has probably already been done. So, we", "problem, and given their individual nature, some of these problems are unforeseeable. However,", "are questions shown in the bottom right sidebar featuring from other sites of", "“hot” by a heuristic that takes into account recent visits, answers, and votes.", "a meta discussion about whether a specific question should be removed from the", "removed. If you feel that any question should not be an HNQ, please", "So, we moderators have to decide on relatively quickly and on a case-by-case", "individual questions from the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible.", "to be HNQs? If you think so, please suggest categories in the answers:", "edits, flag the problematic comments or answers for deletion, or flag for closure.", "more important than precisely defining the category. * Use votes to indicate agreement", "the day we have to decide on a case-by-case basis, by answering the", "do this for questions that you consider in need of editing, cleaning up,", "probably already been done. So, we moderators have to decide on relatively quickly", "precisely defining the category. * Use votes to indicate agreement or disagreement with", "revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it is likely that a question will", "these problems are unforeseeable. However, we as a community can agree that we", "good idea, because by the time the discussion has reached any sort of", "problem on our site?\" Therefore a good rationale is more important than precisely", "\"Do we have this kind of problem on our site?\" Therefore a good", "suggest the respective edits, flag the problematic comments or answers for deletion, or", "questions that are already HNQs (which you can now [see in the revision", "right sidebar featuring from other sites of the Stack Exchange network that are", "for questions that you consider in need of editing, cleaning up, closing, or", "such questions being HNQs is a problem. * Remember that at the end", "HNQs?** If you think so, please suggest categories in the answers: * Suggest", "I am asking: *Are there any categories of questions that we generally* do", "to considerably higher number of visitors – many of whom are unfamiliar with", "can we use this? ==================== Having a meta discussion about whether a specific", "should be closed or can be salvaged with an edit. * Provide a", "do not want certain types of question to be HNQs and try to", "likely that a question will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to", "our site and our community standards. Moderators can now remove individual questions from", "you feel that any question should not be an HNQ, please flag it", "– many of whom are unfamiliar with our site and our community standards.", "shown in the bottom right sidebar featuring from other sites of the Stack", "in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it is likely that a", "that we generally do not want to be HNQs?** If you think so,", "removed from the HNQs is not a good idea, because by the time", "our site?\" Therefore a good rationale is more important than precisely defining the", "==================== Having a meta discussion about whether a specific question should be removed", "recent visits, answers, and votes. There can be issues when one of our", "becomes an HNQ because its increased exposure leads to considerably higher number of", "makes the most sense for questions that are already HNQs (which you can", "one category per answer. * Do not suggest categories of questions that should", "be an HNQ, please flag it for moderator attention and elaborate why. This", "basis whether a question should be removed. If you feel that any question", "(HNQ) are questions shown in the bottom right sidebar featuring from other sites", "the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible. After removing a", "you think it is likely that a question will become an HNQ, but", "that you consider in need of editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead", "have to decide on a case-by-case basis, by answering the question: \"Do we", "HNQs (which you can now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you", "a serious problem, and given their individual nature, some of these problems are", "questions that we generally do not want to be HNQs? If you think", "our community standards. Moderators can now remove individual questions from the Hot Network", "considered “hot” by a heuristic that takes into account recent visits, answers, and", "that are already HNQs (which you can now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)),", "do not want to be HNQs? If you think so, please suggest categories", "of question to be HNQs and try to remove them as quickly as", "need of editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead perform or suggest the", "be issues when one of our questions becomes an HNQ because its increased", "from other sites of the Stack Exchange network that are considered “hot” by", "of whom are unfamiliar with our site and our community standards. Moderators can", "closure. What questions should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove a", "be salvaged with an edit. * Provide a rationale why such questions being", "the discussion has reached any sort of consensus, the potential damage has probably", "HNQs and try to remove them as quickly as possible. Therefore I am", "suggest categories in the answers: * Suggest one category per answer. * Do", "HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove a question from the HNQs, when there", "their individual nature, some of these problems are unforeseeable. However, we as a", "we do not want certain types of question to be HNQs and try", "an edit. * Provide a rationale why such questions being HNQs is a", "the most sense for questions that are already HNQs (which you can now", "quickly as possible. Therefore I am asking: *Are there any categories of questions", "are already HNQs (which you can now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but", "number of visitors – many of whom are unfamiliar with our site and", "you can now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it", "category per answer. Do not suggest categories of questions that should be", "now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it is likely", "cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead perform or suggest the respective edits, flag", "as possible. Therefore I am asking: Are there any categories of questions that", "Moderators can now remove individual questions from the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)).", "that we want to allow it to go hot again. How can we", "allow it to go hot again. How can we use this? ==================== Having", "basis, by answering the question: \"Do we have this kind of problem on", "as quickly as possible. Therefore I am asking: Are there any categories of", "want certain types of question to be HNQs and try to remove them", "sense for questions that are already HNQs (which you can now [see in", "we use this? ==================== Having a meta discussion about whether a specific question", "community can agree that we do not want certain types of question to", "site?\" Therefore a good rationale is more important than precisely defining the category.", "question should be removed from the HNQs is not a good idea, because", "a question will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to flag it.", "the HNQs is not a good idea, because by the time the discussion", "use this? ==================== Having a meta discussion about whether a specific question should", "questions shown in the bottom right sidebar featuring from other sites of the", "that we do not want certain types of question to be HNQs and", "How can we use this? ==================== Having a meta discussion about whether a", "from the Hot Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible. After removing", "feel free to flag it. Please do not do this for questions that", "certain types of question to be HNQs and try to remove them as", "be closed or can be salvaged with an edit. * Provide a rationale", "from the HNQs is not a good idea, because by the time the", "decide on relatively quickly and on a case-by-case basis whether a question should", "to decide on a case-by-case basis, by answering the question: \"Do we have", "been done. So, we moderators have to decide on relatively quickly and on", "closing, or similar. Instead perform or suggest the respective edits, flag the problematic", "account recent visits, answers, and votes. There can be issues when one of", "already HNQs (which you can now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if", "about whether a specific question should be removed from the HNQs is not", "visitors – many of whom are unfamiliar with our site and our community", "that at the end of the day we have to decide on a", "possible. Therefore I am asking: Are there any categories of questions that we", "a case-by-case basis, by answering the question: \"Do we have this kind of", "on a case-by-case basis, by answering the question: \"Do we have this kind", "a case-by-case basis whether a question should be removed. If you feel that", "want to allow it to go hot again. How can we use this?", "is more important than precisely defining the category. * Use votes to indicate", "the answers: * Suggest one category per answer. * Do not suggest categories", "good rationale is more important than precisely defining the category. * Use votes", "has reached any sort of consensus, the potential damage has probably already been", "why such questions being HNQs is a problem. * Remember that at the", "the end of the day we have to decide on a case-by-case basis,", "takes into account recent visits, answers, and votes. There can be issues when", "that any question should not be an HNQ, please flag it for moderator", "problem. * Remember that at the end of the day we have to", "Network Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible. After removing a question, we", "issues when one of our questions becomes an HNQ because its increased exposure", "it. Please do not do this for questions that you consider in need", "However, we as a community can agree that we do not want certain", "individual nature, some of these problems are unforeseeable. However, we as a community", "for moderator attention and elaborate why. This naturally makes the most sense for", "try to remove them as quickly as possible. Therefore I am asking: Are", "but shouldn’t, feel free to flag it. Please do not do this for", "defining the category. * Use votes to indicate agreement or disagreement with proposed", "network that are considered “hot” by a heuristic that takes into account recent", "to decide on relatively quickly and on a case-by-case basis whether a question", "not suggest categories of questions that should be closed or can be salvaged", "* Provide a rationale why such questions being HNQs is a problem. ", "think it is likely that a question will become an HNQ, but shouldn’t,", "HNQs is a problem. Remember that at the end of the day", "is a serious problem, and given their individual nature, some of these problems", "community standards. Moderators can now remove individual questions from the Hot Network Questions", "of visitors – many of whom are unfamiliar with our site and our", "Therefore a good rationale is more important than precisely defining the category. ", "become an HNQ, but shouldn’t, feel free to flag it. Please do not", "discussion has reached any sort of consensus, the potential damage has probably already", "this kind of problem on our site?\" Therefore a good rationale is more", "question should be removed. If you feel that any question should not be", "Exchange network that are considered “hot” by a heuristic that takes into account", "editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead perform or suggest the respective edits,", "question to be HNQs and try to remove them as quickly as possible.", "============= Hot Network Questions (HNQ) are questions shown in the bottom right sidebar", "we as a community can agree that we do not want certain types", "by answering the question: \"Do we have this kind of problem on our", "hot again. How can we use this? ==================== Having a meta discussion about", "This process is irreversible. After removing a question, we cannot decide that we", "Having a meta discussion about whether a specific question should be removed from", "the category. Use votes to indicate agreement or disagreement with proposed categories.", "can now [see in the revision history](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/324641/255554)), but if you think it is", "question, we cannot decide that we want to allow it to go hot", "HNQs, when there is a serious problem, and given their individual nature, some", "by the time the discussion has reached any sort of consensus, the potential", "to flag it. Please do not do this for questions that you consider", "sites of the Stack Exchange network that are considered “hot” by a heuristic", "remove them as quickly as possible. Therefore I am asking: *Are there any", "are considered “hot” by a heuristic that takes into account recent visits, answers,", "discussion about whether a specific question should be removed from the HNQs is", "rationale is more important than precisely defining the category. Use votes to", "do not do this for questions that you consider in need of editing,", "questions becomes an HNQ because its increased exposure leads to considerably higher number", "feel that any question should not be an HNQ, please flag it for", "salvaged with an edit. * Provide a rationale why such questions being HNQs", "up, closing, or similar. Instead perform or suggest the respective edits, flag the", "be removed from the HNQs is not a good idea, because by the", "we cannot decide that we want to allow it to go hot again.", "answers, and votes. There can be issues when one of our questions becomes", "flag it for moderator attention and elaborate why.** This naturally makes the most", "most sense for questions that are already HNQs (which you can now [see", "relatively quickly and on a case-by-case basis whether a question should be removed.", "can be salvaged with an edit. * Provide a rationale why such questions", "Occasionally, we will remove a question from the HNQs, when there is a", "for questions that are already HNQs (which you can now [see in the", "and try to remove them as quickly as possible. Therefore I am asking:", "can be issues when one of our questions becomes an HNQ because its", "per answer. * Do not suggest categories of questions that should be closed", "of these problems are unforeseeable. However, we as a community can agree that", "nature, some of these problems are unforeseeable. However, we as a community can", "questions that you consider in need of editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar.", "Questions list ([announcement](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/325060)). This process is irreversible. After removing a question, we cannot", "than precisely defining the category. * Use votes to indicate agreement or disagreement", "the problematic comments or answers for deletion, or flag for closure. What questions", "suggest categories of questions that should be closed or can be salvaged with", "mechanics ============= Hot Network Questions (HNQ) are questions shown in the bottom right", "think so, please suggest categories in the answers: * Suggest one category per", "a heuristic that takes into account recent visits, answers, and votes. There can", "and our community standards. Moderators can now remove individual questions from the Hot", "quickly and on a case-by-case basis whether a question should be removed. If", "free to flag it. Please do not do this for questions that you", "want to be HNQs? If you think so, please suggest categories in the", "to allow it to go hot again. How can we use this? ====================", "we have to decide on a case-by-case basis, by answering the question: \"Do", "end of the day we have to decide on a case-by-case basis, by", "it to go hot again. How can we use this? ==================== Having a", "meta discussion about whether a specific question should be removed from the HNQs", "if you think it is likely that a question will become an HNQ,", "is a problem. * Remember that at the end of the day we", "we will remove a question from the HNQs, when there is a serious", "for closure. What questions should not be HNQs? ================================== Occasionally, we will remove", "the bottom right sidebar featuring from other sites of the Stack Exchange network", "this for questions that you consider in need of editing, cleaning up, closing,", "a specific question should be removed from the HNQs is not a good", "problematic comments or answers for deletion, or flag for closure. What questions should", "not a good idea, because by the time the discussion has reached any", "of problem on our site?\" Therefore a good rationale is more important than", "an HNQ because its increased exposure leads to considerably higher number of visitors", "problems are unforeseeable. However, we as a community can agree that we do", "a good rationale is more important than precisely defining the category. * Use", "we moderators have to decide on relatively quickly and on a case-by-case basis", "flag it. Please do not do this for questions that you consider in", "you consider in need of editing, cleaning up, closing, or similar. Instead perform", "Do not suggest categories of questions that should be closed or can be", "are unfamiliar with our site and our community standards. Moderators can now remove", "that are considered “hot” by a heuristic that takes into account recent visits,", "Suggest one category per answer. * Do not suggest categories of questions that" ]
[ "of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is my draft: > > > >", "are talking at a polysemy > > * Tacit knowledge makes an obvious", "of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find it interesting as well. > >", "are lots of negations in Daodejing and Middle Way > > * Yinyang", "to put links to my works, which can be perceived as hidden advertisement", "Because I have many links and bullets to provide, I'm not sure if", "if it's fine to put links, then I think having tracking links are", "Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing this letter to ask if you take", "My research interest is about how to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and", "letter finds you well. > > > > > > > > >", "you for your reading. I hope this letter finds you well. > >", "> > > Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > > > > > To", "a proposed framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma,", "you take any new student this year, or if you can introduce a", "in one framework. My observations are explained in this article: [Connections between cognitive", "with it is a proposed framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like", "I want to email to a professor to ask for his feedback on", "> > > My research interest is about how to connect Eastern philosophy", "hope you will find it interesting as well. > > > > >", "the meta first. My concern is that I may need to put links", "to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology in one framework. My observations", "have a question to ask on the main site, and I want to", "> > > > > The article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying", "overview, here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the Power of", "Middle Way > > * Yinyang is best understood with double negation >", "is my draft: > > > > > > > Subject: Inquiry from", "I'm not sure if this is too much for the first contact? The", "this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective).", "best understood with double negation > > > > > > The article", "if you take any new student this year, or if you can introduce", "introduce myself, my name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing this letter", "double negation > > > > > > The article is [well-received in", "nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and discuss it various", "making the question too narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure how to address", "main site, and I want to ask on the meta first. My concern", "> > > > > My research interest is about how to connect", "think having tracking links are fine too? Below is my draft: > >", "you can ask me questions and I will answer. And if it's fine", "My observations are explained in this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology,", "> > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: > > > > > >", "is too much for the first contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and", "can introduce a suitable professor for me. > > > > > >", "go anywhere because the partakers aren't aware that they are talking at a", "to know if he wants to recruit new grad student. Because I have", "are fine too? Below is my draft: > > I want to email", "you can introduce a suitable professor for me. > > > > >", "> > > To introduce myself, my name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I", "[Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > >", "will answer. And if it's fine to put links, then I think having", "new student this year, or if you can introduce a suitable professor for", "my draft: > > > > > > > Subject: Inquiry from potential", "Communication cannot go anywhere because the partakers aren't aware that they are talking", "between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In", "dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and discuss it various applications:", "interest is about how to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology in", "talking at a polysemy > > * Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing", "question to ask on the main site, and I want to ask on", "too narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure how to address that. Maybe you", "and to know if he wants to recruit new grad student. Because I", "> > > > My research interest is about how to connect Eastern", "> > * Communication cannot go anywhere because the partakers aren't aware that", "to ask for his feedback on my work, and to know if he", "is that I may need to put links to my works, which can", "transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and discuss it various applications: [A theory of", "I want to ask on the meta first. My concern is that I", "as hidden advertisement or making the question too narrow (individual factors). I'm not", "for his feedback on my work, and to know if he wants to", "article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). >", "> > In summary: > > > > > > * Communication cannot", "> I want to email to a professor to ask for his feedback", "reading. I hope this letter finds you well. > > > > >", "to email to a professor to ask for his feedback on my work,", "Accompanying with it is a proposed framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts", "ask if you take any new student this year, or if you can", "a professor to ask for his feedback on my work, and to know", "the first contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive", "is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a proposed framework to", "psychology in one framework. My observations are explained in this article: [Connections between", "want to email to a professor to ask for his feedback on my", "factors). I'm not sure how to address that. Maybe you can ask me", "Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express it >", "field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here is his", "one framework. My observations are explained in this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics,", "* Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express it", "this is too much for the first contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/),", "various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find it interesting", "suitable professor for me. > > > > > > My research interest", "the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is my draft: > >", "works, which can be perceived as hidden advertisement or making the question too", "* Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues > > * There", "graduate applicant** > > > > > > Dear Prof. Slingerland, > >", "or if you can introduce a suitable professor for me. > > >", "professor for me. > > > > > > My research interest is", "> > * There are lots of negations in Daodejing and Middle Way", "that I may need to put links to my works, which can be", "community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a proposed framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist", "My concern is that I may need to put links to my works,", "may need to put links to my works, which can be perceived as", "of negations in Daodejing and Middle Way > > * Yinyang is best", "Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: > > > >", "> > > > > > The article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/).", "Prof. Slingerland, > > > > > > To introduce myself, my name", "> > > > The article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with", "observations are explained in this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism", "fine too? Below is my draft: > > I want to email to", "letter to ask if you take any new student this year, or if", "me. > > > > > > My research interest is about how", "> > I want to email to a professor to ask for his", "Below is my draft: > > I want to email to a professor", "concern is that I may need to put links to my works, which", "is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here is his TEDx", "quick overview, here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the Power", "from Vietnam. I am writing this letter to ask if you take any", "put links, then I think having tracking links are fine too? Below is", "The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion).", "can ask me questions and I will answer. And if it's fine to", "is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing this letter to ask if you", "about how to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology in one framework.", "a question to ask on the main site, and I want to ask", "with linguistics and psychology in one framework. My observations are explained in this", "of perspectives, and discuss it various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope", "they are talking at a polysemy > > * Tacit knowledge makes an", "Daodejing and Middle Way > > * Yinyang is best understood with double", "\"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues > > * There are lots of negations", "in Daodejing and Middle Way > > * Yinyang is best understood with", "* Yinyang is best understood with double negation > > > > >", "new grad student. Because I have many links and bullets to provide, I'm", "> > * Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues > >", "help express it > > * Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological", "as well. > > > > > > Thank you for your reading.", "and discuss it various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will", "this letter finds you well. > > > > > > > >", "There are lots of negations in Daodejing and Middle Way > > ", "> > > > > > > Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant", "Not to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is my", "answer. And if it's fine to put links, then I think having tracking", "linguistics and psychology in one framework. My observations are explained in this article:", "Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here", "> > > Communication cannot go anywhere because the partakers aren't aware", "cannot go anywhere because the partakers aren't aware that they are talking at", "professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For", "obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express it > > * Understanding wuwei", "sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and discuss it", "here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF).", "question too narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure how to address that. Maybe", "how to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology in one framework. My", "I have many links and bullets to provide, I'm not sure if this", "* There are lots of negations in Daodejing and Middle Way > >", "provide, I'm not sure if this is too much for the first contact?", "if this is too much for the first contact? The professor is [Edsavr", "and bullets to provide, I'm not sure if this is too much for", "me questions and I will answer. And if it's fine to put links,", "framework. My observations are explained in this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive", "> Thank you for your reading. I hope this letter finds you well.", "wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues > > * There are lots", "to provide, I'm not sure if this is too much for the first", "have many links and bullets to provide, I'm not sure if this is", "issues > > * There are lots of negations in Daodejing and Middle", "sure if this is too much for the first contact? The professor is", "Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is my draft: > > > > >", "> The article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a", "> > To introduce myself, my name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am", "> > > > > > Thank you for your reading. I hope", "Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology in one framework. My observations are explained", "for your reading. I hope this letter finds you well. > > >", "not sure how to address that. Maybe you can ask me questions and", "Metaphors can help express it > > Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can", "a quick overview, here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the", "on the meta first. My concern is that I may need to put", "> * Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express", "> My research interest is about how to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics", "put links to my works, which can be perceived as hidden advertisement or", "To introduce myself, my name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing this", "> > > > > > * Communication cannot go anywhere because the", "to my works, which can be perceived as hidden advertisement or making the", "links to my works, which can be perceived as hidden advertisement or making", "address that. Maybe you can ask me questions and I will answer. And", "at a polysemy > > * Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable.", "> > > > > Thank you for your reading. I hope this", "Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is my draft: >", "[A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find it interesting as well.", "connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology in one framework. My observations are", "anywhere because the partakers aren't aware that they are talking at a polysemy", "I will answer. And if it's fine to put links, then I think", "and I want to ask on the meta first. My concern is that", "For a quick overview, here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try:", "draft: > > I want to email to a professor to ask for", "and I will answer. And if it's fine to put links, then I", "and the field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here", "this year, or if you can introduce a suitable professor for me. >", "aren't aware that they are talking at a polysemy > > * Tacit", "Inquiry from potential graduate applicant** > > > > > > Dear Prof.", "> > > > > To introduce myself, my name is Nhat, from", "grad student. Because I have many links and bullets to provide, I'm not", "knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express it > >", "I am writing this letter to ask if you take any new student", "[cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here is his TEDx Talk:", "negation > > > > > > The article is [well-received in Daoism", "> > * Yinyang is best understood with double negation > > >", "understood with double negation > > > > > > The article is", "hidden advertisement or making the question too narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure", "and Middle Way > > * Yinyang is best understood with double negation", "> * There are lots of negations in Daodejing and Middle Way >", "distortions of perspectives, and discuss it various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I", "and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions", "psychological issues > > * There are lots of negations in Daodejing and", "student this year, or if you can introduce a suitable professor for me.", "to put links, then I think having tracking links are fine too? Below", "> > > > To introduce myself, my name is Nhat, from Vietnam.", "well. > > > > > > Thank you for your reading. I", "it is a proposed framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata,", "> > > Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant > > > >", "can help express it > > * Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture", "introduce a suitable professor for me. > > > > > > My", "ask on the main site, and I want to ask on the meta", "the question too narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure how to address that.", "* Communication cannot go anywhere because the partakers aren't aware that they are", "meta first. My concern is that I may need to put links to", "article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a proposed framework", "Thank you for your reading. I hope this letter finds you well. >", "the partakers aren't aware that they are talking at a polysemy > >", "and distortions of perspectives, and discuss it various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective).", "ask me questions and I will answer. And if it's fine to put", "take any new student this year, or if you can introduce a suitable", "> > The article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is", "this letter to ask if you take any new student this year, or", "Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview,", "is a proposed framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana,", "am writing this letter to ask if you take any new student this", "to a professor to ask for his feedback on my work, and to", "wants to recruit new grad student. Because I have many links and bullets", "I hope this letter finds you well. > > > > > >", "it interesting as well. > > > > > > Thank you for", "site, and I want to ask on the meta first. My concern is", "as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues > > * There are lots of", "myself, my name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing this letter to", "need to put links to my works, which can be perceived as hidden", "[Trying Not to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is", "The article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a proposed", "> > > > Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant > > >", "partakers aren't aware that they are talking at a polysemy > > ", "> > My research interest is about how to connect Eastern philosophy with", "find it interesting as well. > > > > > > Thank you", "Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a proposed framework to illustrate and visualize", "> > > > > Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > > > >", "my draft: > > I want to email to a professor to ask", "because the partakers aren't aware that they are talking at a polysemy >", "Maybe you can ask me questions and I will answer. And if it's", "feedback on my work, and to know if he wants to recruit new", "that. Maybe you can ask me questions and I will answer. And if", "cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary:", "from potential graduate applicant* > > > > > > Dear Prof. Slingerland,", "Vietnam. I am writing this letter to ask if you take any new", "express it > > * Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues", "a polysemy > > * Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors", "tracking links are fine too? Below is my draft: > > I want", "recruit new grad student. Because I have many links and bullets to provide,", "TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > >", "concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and", "which can be perceived as hidden advertisement or making the question too narrow", "email to a professor to ask for his feedback on my work, and", "contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive science of", "Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is my draft: > > >", "> > Thank you for your reading. I hope this letter finds you", "I'm not sure how to address that. Maybe you can ask me questions", "religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to", "his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > >", "research interest is about how to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology", "> > > > > * Communication cannot go anywhere because the partakers", "Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues > > * There are", "questions and I will answer. And if it's fine to put links, then", "in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a proposed framework to illustrate and", "bullets to provide, I'm not sure if this is too much for the", "makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express it > > ", "> > > The article is [well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it", "> Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: > > > > > > ", "> Here is my draft: > > > > > > > *Subject:", "on the main site, and I want to ask on the meta first.", "> Yinyang is best understood with double negation > > > >", "ask on the meta first. My concern is that I may need to", "with double negation > > > > > > The article is [well-received", "psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: > > >", "links are fine too? Below is my draft: > > I want to", "too much for the first contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the", "is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). >", "links, then I think having tracking links are fine too? Below is my", "to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences", "the main site, and I want to ask on the meta first. My", "perceived as hidden advertisement or making the question too narrow (individual factors). I'm", "an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express it > > * Understanding", "visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions of", "> > > > * Communication cannot go anywhere because the partakers aren't", "> * Communication cannot go anywhere because the partakers aren't aware that they", "too? Below is my draft: > > I want to email to a", "I think having tracking links are fine too? Below is my draft: >", "Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: > > > > > > * Communication", "> > Here is my draft: > > > > > > >", "to ask if you take any new student this year, or if you", "first. My concern is that I may need to put links to my", "not sure if this is too much for the first contact? The professor", "having tracking links are fine too? Below is my draft: > > I", "> > > > > > My research interest is about how to", "> > * Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can help", "writing this letter to ask if you take any new student this year,", "student. Because I have many links and bullets to provide, I'm not sure", "it various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find it", "I may need to put links to my works, which can be perceived", "fine to put links, then I think having tracking links are fine too?", "proposed framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the", "is best understood with double negation > > > > > > The", "narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure how to address that. Maybe you can", "much for the first contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field", "polysemy > > * Tacit knowledge makes an obvious thing ineffable. Metaphors can", "that they are talking at a polysemy > > * Tacit knowledge makes", "negations in Daodejing and Middle Way > > * Yinyang is best understood", "draft: > > > > > > > Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate", "if you can introduce a suitable professor for me. > > > >", "for me. > > > > > > My research interest is about", "first contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive science", "And if it's fine to put links, then I think having tracking links", "are explained in this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and", "Slingerland, > > > > > > To introduce myself, my name is", "his feedback on my work, and to know if he wants to recruit", "Here is my draft: > > > > > > > Subject: Inquiry", "or making the question too narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure how to", "> > > Here is my draft: > > > > > >", "to Try: the Power of Spontaneity](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIdrptTwzQY&list=PLr_nm6f2KKDmVQ9LsVX_7nE72VzfXEsXF). > > > Here is my draft:", "> > Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant > > > > >", "potential graduate applicant > > > > > > Dear Prof. Slingerland, >", "Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant** > > > > > > Dear", "> > > > Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > > > > >", "ask for his feedback on my work, and to know if he wants", "[Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick", "can nurture psychological issues > > * There are lots of negations in", "he wants to recruit new grad student. Because I have many links and", "Yinyang is best understood with double negation > > > > > >", "summary: > > > > > > * Communication cannot go anywhere because", "> Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant > > > > > >", "theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find it interesting as well. >", "of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying Not", "perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find it interesting as well. > > >", "you will find it interesting as well. > > > > > >", "work, and to know if he wants to recruit new grad student. Because", "I have a question to ask on the main site, and I want", "want to ask on the meta first. My concern is that I may", "Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives,", "can be perceived as hidden advertisement or making the question too narrow (individual", "my name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing this letter to ask", "advertisement or making the question too narrow (individual factors). I'm not sure how", "it > > * Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues >", "how to address that. Maybe you can ask me questions and I will", "lots of negations in Daodejing and Middle Way > > * Yinyang is", "framework to illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations,", "to recruit new grad student. Because I have many links and bullets to", "and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: > > > > >", "Way* > > * Yinyang is best understood with double negation > >", "hope this letter finds you well. > > > > > > >", "applicant** > > > > > > Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > >", "In summary: > > > > > > * Communication cannot go anywhere", "perspectives, and discuss it various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you", "will find it interesting as well. > > > > > > Thank", "(individual factors). I'm not sure how to address that. Maybe you can ask", "> > > > > > Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant >", "> > > > Thank you for your reading. I hope this letter", "to ask on the main site, and I want to ask on the", "thing ineffable. Metaphors can help express it > > * Understanding wuwei as", "the transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and discuss it various applications: [A", "sure how to address that. Maybe you can ask me questions and I", "your reading. I hope this letter finds you well. > > > >", "> > > > > > Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > > >", "if he wants to recruit new grad student. Because I have many links", "> > > > > > To introduce myself, my name is Nhat,", "discuss it various applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find", "name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing this letter to ask if", "many links and bullets to provide, I'm not sure if this is too", "my work, and to know if he wants to recruit new grad student.", "> * Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\" can nurture psychological issues > > ", "transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and discuss it various applications: [A theory", "> > > Thank you for your reading. I hope this letter finds", "to ask on the meta first. My concern is that I may need", "links and bullets to provide, I'm not sure if this is too much", "is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a", "> Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > > > > > To introduce myself,", "for the first contact? The professor is [Edsavr Slingerland](https://eslingerland.arts.ubc.ca/), and the field is", "illustrate and visualize Buddhist concepts like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and", "I hope you will find it interesting as well. > > > >", "like sunyata, nirvana, dharma, the transformations, transcendences and distortions of perspectives, and discuss", "and psychology in one framework. My observations are explained in this article: [Connections", "science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here is his TEDx Talk: [Trying", "be perceived as hidden advertisement or making the question too narrow (individual factors).", "the field is [cognitive science of religion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science_of_religion). For a quick overview, here is", "aware that they are talking at a polysemy > > Tacit knowledge", "in this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > >", "know if he wants to recruit new grad student. Because I have many", "my works, which can be perceived as hidden advertisement or making the question", "then I think having tracking links are fine too? Below is my draft:", "professor to ask for his feedback on my work, and to know if", "philosophy with linguistics and psychology in one framework. My observations are explained in", "> To introduce myself, my name is Nhat, from Vietnam. I am writing", "cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: > >", "ineffable. Metaphors can help express it > > * Understanding wuwei as \"non-doing\"", "> > Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > > > > > To introduce", "is my draft: > > I want to email to a professor to", "applications: [A theory of perspective](http://lyminhnhat.com/2018/12/21/a-theory-of-perspective/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). I hope you will find it interesting as", "year, or if you can introduce a suitable professor for me. > >", "[well-received in Daoism community](https://www.reddit.com/r/taoism/comments/azg0bd/cognitive_linguistics_cognitive_psychology/). Accompanying with it is a proposed framework to illustrate", "any new student this year, or if you can introduce a suitable professor", "> In summary: > > > > > > * Communication cannot go", "linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and > > Daoism](http://lyminhnhat.com/2019/03/10/linguistics-psychology-buddhism-daoism/?utm_source=Stack&20Exchange&utm_medium=Academia&20Meta&utm_campaign=Perspective). > > In summary: >", "it's fine to put links, then I think having tracking links are fine", "Dear Prof. Slingerland, > > > > > > To introduce myself, my", "nurture psychological issues > > * There are lots of negations in Daodejing", "a suitable professor for me. > > > > > > My research", "> > > > > Subject: Inquiry from potential graduate applicant > >", "to address that. Maybe you can ask me questions and I will answer.", "on my work, and to know if he wants to recruit new grad", "explained in this article: [Connections between cognitive linguistics, cognitive psychology, Buddhism and >", "is about how to connect Eastern philosophy with linguistics and psychology in one", "interesting as well. > > > > > > Thank you for your" ]
[ "we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How", "tags and saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with", "[Is being socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two", "1 question: [How should one advertise a program if it doesn't lead to", "program if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being", "one advertise a program if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1", "with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should one advertise a program", "three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should one", "saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question:", "and saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1", "and answering the question [Do I need to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat)", "reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags are not", "was reading and answering the question [Do I need to sit for TOEFL", "to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being socially reclusive okay for a", "should one advertise a program if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with", "question: [Is being socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last", "useful and identical to the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be", "first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be merged in to the [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia)", "with 1 question: [How should one advertise a program if it doesn't lead", "[How should one advertise a program if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia)", "[Do I need to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant", "[South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should one advertise a program if it doesn't", "answering the question [Do I need to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I", "questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should one advertise a program if it", "doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being socially reclusive okay", "Since the last two tags are not really useful and identical to the", "the last two tags are not really useful and identical to the first", "for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags are not really useful", "identical to the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be merged in", "TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags and saw we have three", "I need to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags", "question: [How should one advertise a program if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs)", "searched for relevant tags and saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22", "advertise a program if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question:", "have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should", "if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being socially", "jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being socially reclusive okay for a graduate", "22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should one advertise a program if", "1 question: [Is being socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the", "tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be merged in to the [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) tag?", "need to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags and", "[South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student)", "the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be merged in to the", "a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags are not really useful and", "last two tags are not really useful and identical to the first tag,", "I searched for relevant tags and saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with", "student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags are not really useful and identical to", "or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags and saw we have three tags:", "being socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags", "for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags and saw we have", "reading and answering the question [Do I need to sit for TOEFL or", "relevant tags and saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia)", "I was reading and answering the question [Do I need to sit for", "for relevant tags and saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions", "[Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should one advertise a", "the question [Do I need to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched", "graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags are not really useful and identical", "really useful and identical to the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia)", "lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being socially reclusive okay for", "Recently I was reading and answering the question [Do I need to sit", "to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags and saw", "socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags are", "tags are not really useful and identical to the first tag, should these", "it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is being socially reclusive", "are not really useful and identical to the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia)", "okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since the last two tags are not really", "to the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be merged in to", "not really useful and identical to the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and", "SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags and saw we have three tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia)", "and identical to the first tag, should these [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) and [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) be merged", "a program if it doesn't lead to jobs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/120628/how-should-one-advertise-a-program-if-it-doesnt-lead-to-jobs) [South-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-asia) with 1 question: [Is", "two tags are not really useful and identical to the first tag, should", "question [Do I need to sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for", "with 1 question: [Is being socially reclusive okay for a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126092/is-being-socially-reclusive-okay-for-a-graduate-student) Since", "sit for TOEFL or SAT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125804/do-i-need-to-sit-for-toefl-or-sat) I searched for relevant tags and saw we", "tags: [Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/asia) with 22 questions [South-East-Asia](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/south-east-asia) with 1 question: [How should one advertise" ]
[ "vary between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and even groups. It is easy", "to arrive at the false conclusion that some aspect of academia is the", "* [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) ", "this site: Questions whose answers depends on the culture and regulations of", "or that research in poorer countries focuses on less expensive subjects. * Group", "community wiki. Please feel free to contribute. Table of Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472)", "“it depends”. * Answers that assume that academia is homogeneous in some respect", "add that does not fit into the existing categories, add a new answer", "* Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of the differences of subjects, countries", "a valuable resource for the users of this site. Hence I am asking:", "varies more than you think it does.** More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary", "answers into reasonable categories, roughly per tag on the main site. If you", "different axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups. * Answers", "users on this site: * Questions whose answers depends on the culture and", "than many people expect? * Variations can be along different axes, e.g., between", "physics don’t refer to themselves as labs, or that research in poorer countries", "* [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) * [Student Body Properties](/q/4480/#26466)", "same everywhere. This is a problem that pertains to all levels of users", "many people expect? * Variations can be along different axes, e.g., between fields,", "is: Academia varies more than you think it does. More explicitly: Academic practices", "only a list of the most important examples – which is already quite", "fit into the existing categories, add a new answer (and link it in", "a new answer (and link it in the table of contents below). ", "a list of the most important examples – which is already quite long", "site. This is a community wiki. Please feel free to contribute. Table", "* [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic", "the restrictions and purposes of that question, it contains only a list of", "of the differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is little surprising that", "relevant posts on the main site. * This is a community wiki. Please", "([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by us (or", "* Questions whose answers depends on the culture and regulations of individual institutions", "which respects does academia vary more than many people expect? * Variations can", "strongly vary between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and even groups. It is", "academia is homogeneous in some respect when it is not are at best", "homogeneous in some respect when it is not are at best confusing to", "the main site. If you have something to add that does not fit", "[Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) ", "site. If you have something to add that does not fit into the", "e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups. Answers shouldn’t be", "categories, add a new answer (and link it in the table of contents", "short introduction. Yet, due to the above problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities", "into reasonable categories, roughly per tag on the main site. If you have", "the table of contents below). * When possible, link to relevant posts on", "fields, journals, universities, departments, and even groups. It is easy to arrive at", "[Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) * [Student Body Properties](/q/4480/#26466) ", "respects does academia vary more than many people expect? Variations can be", "tired of having a bazillion answers whose only substance is: “it depends”. ", "regulations of individual institutions ([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be", "and wrong and misleading at worst. I already noted this in [my answer", "noted this in [my answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely", "the above problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia would be a", "differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is little surprising that work groups", "substance is: “it depends”. Answers that assume that academia is homogeneous in", "Answers that assume that academia is homogeneous in some respect when it is", "Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment", "is little surprising that work groups in theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves", "whose answers depends on the culture and regulations of individual institutions ([that operate", "* [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) ", "an extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia would be a valuable resource for", "that some aspect of academia is the same everywhere. This is a problem", "inhomogeneities in academia would be a valuable resource for the users of this", "contribute. Table of Contents ================= [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing", "link to relevant posts on the main site. * This is a community", "I am asking: This Question ============= In which respects does academia vary more", "[Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) * [Student", "in some respect when it is not are at best confusing to some", "something that is supposed to be a short introduction. Yet, due to the", "by us (or any other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since", "is already quite long for something that is supposed to be a short", "feel free to contribute. Table of Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) ", "between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and even groups. It is easy to", "We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have become tired of having a bazillion", "list of the most important examples – which is already quite long for", "conclusion that some aspect of academia is the same everywhere. This is a", "popular. However, given the restrictions and purposes of that question, it contains only", "the existing categories, add a new answer (and link it in the table", "[Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying", "academia that is important to be aware of when using this site is:", "it is little surprising that work groups in theoretical physics don’t refer to", "which is already quite long for something that is supposed to be a", "research in poorer countries focuses on less expensive subjects. * Group answers into", "universities, departments, or groups. * Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of the", "================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and", "would be a valuable resource for the users of this site. Hence I", "to themselves as labs, or that research in poorer countries focuses on less", "Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) * [Student Body", "* When possible, link to relevant posts on the main site. * This", "practices strongly vary between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and even groups. It", "this site is: Academia varies more than you think it does. More explicitly:", "* Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly per tag on the main site.", "confusing to some readers and wrong and misleading at worst. I already noted", "in theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves as labs, or that research in", "of the most important examples – which is already quite long for something", "more than many people expect? * Variations can be along different axes, e.g.,", "Yet, due to the above problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia", "subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is little surprising that work groups in theoretical", "you think it does.** More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between countries, fields,", "supposed to be a short introduction. Yet, due to the above problems, an", "If you have something to add that does not fit into the existing", "is homogeneous in some respect when it is not are at best confusing", "of this site. Hence I am asking: This Question ============= In which respects", "such questions since we have become tired of having a bazillion answers whose", "similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have become tired of", "answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However, given the", "site: * Questions whose answers depends on the culture and regulations of individual", "(or any other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have", "problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia would be a valuable resource", "the false conclusion that some aspect of academia is the same everywhere. This", "it in the table of contents below). * When possible, link to relevant", "bazillion answers whose only substance is: “it depends”. * Answers that assume that", "Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD", "to be aware of when using this site is: *Academia varies more than", " Answers that assume that academia is homogeneous in some respect when it", "culture and regulations of individual institutions ([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot", "think it does.** More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between countries, fields, journals,", "levels of users on this site: * Questions whose answers depends on the", "PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) * [Student Body Properties](/q/4480/#26466) * [Academic Administration](/q/4471#5257)", "wiki. Please feel free to contribute. Table of Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) ", "a short introduction. Yet, due to the above problems, an extensive list of", "does academia vary more than many people expect? Variations can be along", "groups in theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves as labs, or that research", "countries focuses on less expensive subjects. * Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly", "shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of the differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g.,", "posts on the main site. * This is a community wiki. Please feel", "more than you think it does.** More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between", "readers and wrong and misleading at worst. I already noted this in [my", "More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and", "to relevant posts on the main site. * This is a community wiki.", "Hence I am asking: This Question ============= In which respects does academia vary", "an obvious consequence of the differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is", "is easy to arrive at the false conclusion that some aspect of academia", "is a community wiki. Please feel free to contribute. Table of Contents =================", "academia would be a valuable resource for the users of this site. Hence", "[Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476)", "on this site: * Questions whose answers depends on the culture and regulations", "is supposed to be a short introduction. Yet, due to the above problems,", "already quite long for something that is supposed to be a short introduction.", "[my answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However, given", "for something that is supposed to be a short introduction. Yet, due to", "Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of the differences of subjects, countries etc.,", "list of inhomogeneities in academia would be a valuable resource for the users", "reasonable categories, roughly per tag on the main site. If you have something", "pertains to all levels of users on this site: * Questions whose answers", "SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However, given the restrictions and purposes of that", "aware of when using this site is: *Academia varies more than you think", "to contribute. Table of Contents ================= [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and", "at worst. I already noted this in [my answer to Welcome to Academia", "when it is not are at best confusing to some readers and wrong", "am asking: This Question ============= In which respects does academia vary more than", "themselves as labs, or that research in poorer countries focuses on less expensive", "quite long for something that is supposed to be a short introduction. Yet,", "new answer (and link it in the table of contents below). * When", "whose only substance is: “it depends”. * Answers that assume that academia is", "and misleading at worst. I already noted this in [my answer to Welcome", "and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and", "become tired of having a bazillion answers whose only substance is: “it depends”.", "[close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have become tired of having a bazillion answers", "free to contribute. Table of Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing", "academia vary more than many people expect? * Variations can be along different", "to be a short introduction. Yet, due to the above problems, an extensive", "of academia is the same everywhere. This is a problem that pertains to", "This Question ============= In which respects does academia vary more than many people", "and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and", "contents below). * When possible, link to relevant posts on the main site.", "this in [my answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular.", "of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is little surprising that work groups in", "actualities of academia that is important to be aware of when using this", "Variations can be along different axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments,", "tag on the main site. If you have something to add that does", "(and link it in the table of contents below). * When possible, link", "only substance is: “it depends”. * Answers that assume that academia is homogeneous", "above problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia would be a valuable", "below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by us (or any other", "[Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses", "Questions whose answers depends on the culture and regulations of individual institutions ([that", "refer to themselves as labs, or that research in poorer countries focuses on", "Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly per tag on the main site. If", "Please feel free to contribute. Table of Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473)", "surprising that work groups in theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves as labs,", "groups. * Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of the differences of subjects,", "a community wiki. Please feel free to contribute. Table of Contents ================= ", "on less expensive subjects. Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly per tag", "Introduction ============ One of the actualities of academia that is important to be", "departments, or groups. * Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of the differences", "important to be aware of when using this site is: *Academia varies more", "add a new answer (and link it in the table of contents below).", "journals, universities, departments, or groups. Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of", "to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However, given the restrictions", "It is easy to arrive at the false conclusion that some aspect of", "is: “it depends”. * Answers that assume that academia is homogeneous in some", "at best confusing to some readers and wrong and misleading at worst. I", "etc., e.g., it is little surprising that work groups in theoretical physics don’t", "categories, roughly per tag on the main site. If you have something to", "I already noted this in [my answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which", "Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However, given the restrictions and", "don’t refer to themselves as labs, or that research in poorer countries focuses", "of individual institutions ([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered", "is not are at best confusing to some readers and wrong and misleading", "is important to be aware of when using this site is: Academia varies", "cannot reasonably be answered by us (or any other similar Internet site). We", "Academia varies more than you think it does. More explicitly: Academic practices strongly", "national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by us (or any other similar Internet", "than you think it does. More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between countries,", "us (or any other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we", "poorer countries focuses on less expensive subjects. * Group answers into reasonable categories,", "be aware of when using this site is: *Academia varies more than you", "does not fit into the existing categories, add a new answer (and link", "or groups. Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence of the differences of", "aspect of academia is the same everywhere. This is a problem that pertains", "wrong and misleading at worst. I already noted this in [my answer to", "restrictions and purposes of that question, it contains only a list of the", "universities, departments, and even groups. It is easy to arrive at the false", "possible, link to relevant posts on the main site. * This is a", "already noted this in [my answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got", "it contains only a list of the most important examples – which is", "be a valuable resource for the users of this site. Hence I am", "When possible, link to relevant posts on the main site. * This is", "In which respects does academia vary more than many people expect? * Variations", "respect when it is not are at best confusing to some readers and", "Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However, given the restrictions and purposes of", "as labs, or that research in poorer countries focuses on less expensive subjects.", "not fit into the existing categories, add a new answer (and link it", "for the users of this site. Hence I am asking: This Question =============", "Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477)", "main site. If you have something to add that does not fit into", "to the above problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia would be", "existing categories, add a new answer (and link it in the table of", "journals, universities, departments, and even groups. It is easy to arrive at the", "and regulations of individual institutions ([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably", "that question, it contains only a list of the most important examples –", "people expect? * Variations can be along different axes, e.g., between fields, countries,", "some aspect of academia is the same everywhere. This is a problem that", "expect? * Variations can be along different axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals,", "– which is already quite long for something that is supposed to be", "be answered by us (or any other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such", "of users on this site: * Questions whose answers depends on the culture", "can be along different axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or", "that does not fit into the existing categories, add a new answer (and", "be a short introduction. Yet, due to the above problems, an extensive list", "that work groups in theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves as labs, or", "asking: This Question ============= In which respects does academia vary more than many", "* This is a community wiki. Please feel free to contribute. Table of", "* Variations can be along different axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities,", "examples – which is already quite long for something that is supposed to", "institutions ([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by us", "any other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have become", "academia is the same everywhere. This is a problem that pertains to all", "worst. I already noted this in [my answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734),", "little surprising that work groups in theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves as", "not are at best confusing to some readers and wrong and misleading at", "* [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475)", "the differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is little surprising that work", "Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) * [Studying and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478)", "easy to arrive at the false conclusion that some aspect of academia is", "of having a bazillion answers whose only substance is: “it depends”. * Answers", "* [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) * [Employment and Funding](/q/4471#4475) * [Academic Life](/q/4471#4476) ", "is a problem that pertains to all levels of users on this site:", "site. Hence I am asking: This Question ============= In which respects does academia", "the culture and regulations of individual institutions ([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734))", "important examples – which is already quite long for something that is supposed", "a problem that pertains to all levels of users on this site: ", "Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have become tired of having", "However, given the restrictions and purposes of that question, it contains only a", "to all levels of users on this site: * Questions whose answers depends", "subjects. * Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly per tag on the main", "and purposes of that question, it contains only a list of the most", "resource for the users of this site. Hence I am asking: This Question", "purposes of that question, it contains only a list of the most important", "of that question, it contains only a list of the most important examples", "table of contents below). * When possible, link to relevant posts on the", "that is important to be aware of when using this site is: *Academia", "you have something to add that does not fit into the existing categories,", "of contents below). When possible, link to relevant posts on the main", "some readers and wrong and misleading at worst. I already noted this in", "users of this site. Hence I am asking: This Question ============= In which", "explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and even", "everywhere. This is a problem that pertains to all levels of users on", "all levels of users on this site: * Questions whose answers depends on", "other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have become tired", "got insanely popular. However, given the restrictions and purposes of that question, it", "problem that pertains to all levels of users on this site: * Questions", "groups. It is easy to arrive at the false conclusion that some aspect", "the users of this site. Hence I am asking: This Question ============= In", "be an obvious consequence of the differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it", "and PhD Programmes](/q/4471#4477) * [Theses and Defences](/q/4471#4478) * [Student Body Properties](/q/4480/#26466) * [Academic", "of inhomogeneities in academia would be a valuable resource for the users of", "departments, and even groups. It is easy to arrive at the false conclusion", "on the culture and regulations of individual institutions ([that operate below the national", "answers depends on the culture and regulations of individual institutions ([that operate below", "this site. Hence I am asking: This Question ============= In which respects does", "question, it contains only a list of the most important examples – which", "have something to add that does not fit into the existing categories, add", "we have become tired of having a bazillion answers whose only substance is:", "This is a problem that pertains to all levels of users on this", "on the main site. * This is a community wiki. Please feel free", "work groups in theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves as labs, or that", "One of the actualities of academia that is important to be aware of", "site is: Academia varies more than you think it does. More explicitly: Academic", "most important examples – which is already quite long for something that is", "of Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474) ", "============= In which respects does academia vary more than many people expect? ", "answered by us (or any other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions", "to add that does not fit into the existing categories, add a new", "obvious consequence of the differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is little", "the same everywhere. This is a problem that pertains to all levels of", "of when using this site is: *Academia varies more than you think it", "fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups. Answers shouldn’t be an obvious", "answers whose only substance is: “it depends”. * Answers that assume that academia", "level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by us (or any other similar Internet site).", "does.** More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments,", "misleading at worst. I already noted this in [my answer to Welcome to", "to some readers and wrong and misleading at worst. I already noted this", "the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by us (or any other similar", "countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups. * Answers shouldn’t be an obvious consequence", "extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia would be a valuable resource for the", "Academic practices strongly vary between countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and even groups.", "depends”. * Answers that assume that academia is homogeneous in some respect when", "given the restrictions and purposes of that question, it contains only a list", "labs, or that research in poorer countries focuses on less expensive subjects. ", "per tag on the main site. If you have something to add that", "in the table of contents below). When possible, link to relevant posts", "be along different axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups.", "assume that academia is homogeneous in some respect when it is not are", "that assume that academia is homogeneous in some respect when it is not", "countries etc., e.g., it is little surprising that work groups in theoretical physics", "a bazillion answers whose only substance is: “it depends”. * Answers that assume", "that academia is homogeneous in some respect when it is not are at", "having a bazillion answers whose only substance is: “it depends”. * Answers that", "are at best confusing to some readers and wrong and misleading at worst.", "along different axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups. ", "the actualities of academia that is important to be aware of when using", "between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups. Answers shouldn’t be an", "due to the above problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities in academia would", "countries, fields, journals, universities, departments, and even groups. It is easy to arrive", "site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734) such questions since we have become tired of having a", "Question ============= In which respects does academia vary more than many people expect?", "This is a community wiki. Please feel free to contribute. Table of Contents", "e.g., it is little surprising that work groups in theoretical physics don’t refer", "expensive subjects. * Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly per tag on the", "something to add that does not fit into the existing categories, add a", "below). * When possible, link to relevant posts on the main site. ", "in [my answer to Welcome to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However,", "roughly per tag on the main site. If you have something to add", "on the main site. If you have something to add that does not", "valuable resource for the users of this site. Hence I am asking: This", "operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by us (or any", "arrive at the false conclusion that some aspect of academia is the same", "of the actualities of academia that is important to be aware of when", "is the same everywhere. This is a problem that pertains to all levels", "depends on the culture and regulations of individual institutions ([that operate below the", "less expensive subjects. Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly per tag on", "introduction. Yet, due to the above problems, an extensive list of inhomogeneities in", "which got insanely popular. However, given the restrictions and purposes of that question,", "false conclusion that some aspect of academia is the same everywhere. This is", "the main site. * This is a community wiki. Please feel free to", "that is supposed to be a short introduction. Yet, due to the above", "Table of Contents ================= * [Publications](/q/4471#4472) * [Authorship](/q/4471#4473) * [Writing and Writing Style](/q/4471#4474)", "some respect when it is not are at best confusing to some readers", "questions since we have become tired of having a bazillion answers whose only", "when using this site is: Academia varies more than you think it does.", "reasonably be answered by us (or any other similar Internet site). We [close](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406/7734)", "insanely popular. However, given the restrictions and purposes of that question, it contains", "vary more than many people expect? * Variations can be along different axes,", "individual institutions ([that operate below the national level](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3895/7734)) cannot reasonably be answered by", "axes, e.g., between fields, countries, journals, universities, departments, or groups. * Answers shouldn’t", "main site. * This is a community wiki. Please feel free to contribute.", "the most important examples – which is already quite long for something that", "that pertains to all levels of users on this site: * Questions whose", "that research in poorer countries focuses on less expensive subjects. * Group answers", "in poorer countries focuses on less expensive subjects. * Group answers into reasonable", "focuses on less expensive subjects. * Group answers into reasonable categories, roughly per", "it is not are at best confusing to some readers and wrong and", "contains only a list of the most important examples – which is already", "in academia would be a valuable resource for the users of this site.", "to Academia SE](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1212/7734), which got insanely popular. However, given the restrictions and purposes", "at the false conclusion that some aspect of academia is the same everywhere.", "into the existing categories, add a new answer (and link it in the", "and even groups. It is easy to arrive at the false conclusion that", "of academia that is important to be aware of when using this site", "have become tired of having a bazillion answers whose only substance is: “it", "best confusing to some readers and wrong and misleading at worst. I already", "theoretical physics don’t refer to themselves as labs, or that research in poorer", "============ One of the actualities of academia that is important to be aware", "using this site is: Academia varies more than you think it does. More", "consequence of the differences of subjects, countries etc., e.g., it is little surprising", "it does.** More explicitly: Academic practices strongly vary between countries, fields, journals, universities,", "link it in the table of contents below). * When possible, link to", "long for something that is supposed to be a short introduction. Yet, due", "answer (and link it in the table of contents below). * When possible,", "since we have become tired of having a bazillion answers whose only substance", "even groups. It is easy to arrive at the false conclusion that some" ]
[ "power than we should have. I vote to close a lot of questions", "recommendations, not the final answer. I've also complained when mods close questions with", "for the phd tag. I'm not a moderator. But it seems that if", "a duplicate), I can do it on my own, without votes from others.", "a mistake as it gives a non-mod more power than we should have.", "own, without votes from others. I think this is probably a mistake as", "not a moderator. But it seems that if I vote to close a", "moderator. But it seems that if I vote to close a question tagged", "mistake as it gives a non-mod more power than we should have. I", "as only recommendations, not the final answer. I've also complained when mods close", "if I consider the question borderline rather than clearly off topic. Is this", "question tagged with phd (at least as a duplicate), I can do it", "seems that if I vote to close a question tagged with phd (at", "I have a gold badge for the phd tag. I'm not a moderator.", "it gives a non-mod more power than we should have. I vote to", "should have. I vote to close a lot of questions but consider my", "do it on my own, without votes from others. I think this is", "my votes as only recommendations, not the final answer. I've also complained when", "without votes from others. I think this is probably a mistake as it", "borderline rather than clearly off topic. Is this intended behavior? If so, could", "phd (at least as a duplicate), I can do it on my own,", "to close a lot of questions but consider my votes as only recommendations,", "the phd tag. I'm not a moderator. But it seems that if I", "also complained when mods close questions with no other votes if I consider", "my own, without votes from others. I think this is probably a mistake", "it seems that if I vote to close a question tagged with phd", "tag. I'm not a moderator. But it seems that if I vote to", "a non-mod more power than we should have. I vote to close a", "of questions but consider my votes as only recommendations, not the final answer.", "consider my votes as only recommendations, not the final answer. I've also complained", "badge for the phd tag. I'm not a moderator. But it seems that", "could we be warned before casting such votes that the vote would be", "I've also complained when mods close questions with no other votes if I", "as it gives a non-mod more power than we should have. I vote", "I vote to close a lot of questions but consider my votes as", "Is this intended behavior? If so, could we be warned before casting such", "others. I think this is probably a mistake as it gives a non-mod", "I vote to close a question tagged with phd (at least as a", "the question borderline rather than clearly off topic. Is this intended behavior? If", "not the final answer. I've also complained when mods close questions with no", "this is probably a mistake as it gives a non-mod more power than", "we should have. I vote to close a lot of questions but consider", "from others. I think this is probably a mistake as it gives a", "If so, could we be warned before casting such votes that the vote", "duplicate), I can do it on my own, without votes from others. I", "if I vote to close a question tagged with phd (at least as", "only recommendations, not the final answer. I've also complained when mods close questions", "intended behavior? If so, could we be warned before casting such votes that", "questions with no other votes if I consider the question borderline rather than", "I consider the question borderline rather than clearly off topic. Is this intended", "close a question tagged with phd (at least as a duplicate), I can", "a gold badge for the phd tag. I'm not a moderator. But it", "lot of questions but consider my votes as only recommendations, not the final", "votes if I consider the question borderline rather than clearly off topic. Is", "than we should have. I vote to close a lot of questions but", "But it seems that if I vote to close a question tagged with", "(at least as a duplicate), I can do it on my own, without", "behavior? If so, could we be warned before casting such votes that the", "it on my own, without votes from others. I think this is probably", "close a lot of questions but consider my votes as only recommendations, not", "clearly off topic. Is this intended behavior? If so, could we be warned", "topic. Is this intended behavior? If so, could we be warned before casting", "a question tagged with phd (at least as a duplicate), I can do", "probably a mistake as it gives a non-mod more power than we should", "think this is probably a mistake as it gives a non-mod more power", "so, could we be warned before casting such votes that the vote would", "vote to close a question tagged with phd (at least as a duplicate),", "with no other votes if I consider the question borderline rather than clearly", "as a duplicate), I can do it on my own, without votes from", "other votes if I consider the question borderline rather than clearly off topic.", "gives a non-mod more power than we should have. I vote to close", "I can do it on my own, without votes from others. I think", "vote to close a lot of questions but consider my votes as only", "we be warned before casting such votes that the vote would be definitive?", "question borderline rather than clearly off topic. Is this intended behavior? If so,", "gold badge for the phd tag. I'm not a moderator. But it seems", "to close a question tagged with phd (at least as a duplicate), I", "when mods close questions with no other votes if I consider the question", "least as a duplicate), I can do it on my own, without votes", "questions but consider my votes as only recommendations, not the final answer. I've", "a moderator. But it seems that if I vote to close a question", "consider the question borderline rather than clearly off topic. Is this intended behavior?", "have. I vote to close a lot of questions but consider my votes", "close questions with no other votes if I consider the question borderline rather", "I think this is probably a mistake as it gives a non-mod more", "can do it on my own, without votes from others. I think this", "is probably a mistake as it gives a non-mod more power than we", "with phd (at least as a duplicate), I can do it on my", "mods close questions with no other votes if I consider the question borderline", "have a gold badge for the phd tag. I'm not a moderator. But", "answer. I've also complained when mods close questions with no other votes if", "than clearly off topic. Is this intended behavior? If so, could we be", "but consider my votes as only recommendations, not the final answer. I've also", "the final answer. I've also complained when mods close questions with no other", "tagged with phd (at least as a duplicate), I can do it on", "final answer. I've also complained when mods close questions with no other votes", "that if I vote to close a question tagged with phd (at least", "on my own, without votes from others. I think this is probably a", "votes from others. I think this is probably a mistake as it gives", "rather than clearly off topic. Is this intended behavior? If so, could we", "this intended behavior? If so, could we be warned before casting such votes", "non-mod more power than we should have. I vote to close a lot", "no other votes if I consider the question borderline rather than clearly off", "phd tag. I'm not a moderator. But it seems that if I vote", "a lot of questions but consider my votes as only recommendations, not the", "votes as only recommendations, not the final answer. I've also complained when mods", "I'm not a moderator. But it seems that if I vote to close", "off topic. Is this intended behavior? If so, could we be warned before", "more power than we should have. I vote to close a lot of", "complained when mods close questions with no other votes if I consider the" ]
[ "if someone else wishes to ask the new question, they can do that.", "or if someone else wishes to ask the new question, they can do", "original question closed. If the OP wishes to edit the question, or if", "to be reopened. It also seems to stray vary far from the OP’s", "me and likely to receive the votes needed to be reopened. It also", "the OP’s question. I personally think we should reject the edit and keep", "edit the question, or if someone else wishes to ask the new question,", "be reopened. It also seems to stray vary far from the OP’s question.", "want a book to be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the", "seems clearly off topic) to a hypothetical academic text book. The edited question", "off topic) to a hypothetical academic text book. The edited question seems to", "user heavily edited someone else's closed question [I want a book to be", "topic to me and likely to receive the votes needed to be reopened.", "seems to be on topic to me and likely to receive the votes", "book to be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from", "It also seems to stray vary far from the OP’s question. I personally", "votes needed to be reopened. It also seems to stray vary far from", "the edit and keep the original question closed. If the OP wishes to", "seems to stray vary far from the OP’s question. I personally think we", "focusing on a popular fiction book (which seems clearly off topic) to a", "topic) to a hypothetical academic text book. The edited question seems to be", "to edit the question, or if someone else wishes to ask the new", "popular fiction book (which seems clearly off topic) to a hypothetical academic text", "vary far from the OP’s question. I personally think we should reject the", "the question, or if someone else wishes to ask the new question, they", "into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from focusing on a popular", "a hypothetical academic text book. The edited question seems to be on topic", "we should reject the edit and keep the original question closed. If the", "heavily edited someone else's closed question [I want a book to be translated", "book. The edited question seems to be on topic to me and likely", "a popular fiction book (which seems clearly off topic) to a hypothetical academic", "edit and keep the original question closed. If the OP wishes to edit", "OP wishes to edit the question, or if someone else wishes to ask", "likely to receive the votes needed to be reopened. It also seems to", "to a hypothetical academic text book. The edited question seems to be on", "else's closed question [I want a book to be translated into my native", "academic text book. The edited question seems to be on topic to me", "needed to be reopened. It also seems to stray vary far from the", "to change the question from focusing on a popular fiction book (which seems", "to be on topic to me and likely to receive the votes needed", "to me and likely to receive the votes needed to be reopened. It", "to stray vary far from the OP’s question. I personally think we should", "fiction book (which seems clearly off topic) to a hypothetical academic text book.", "question from focusing on a popular fiction book (which seems clearly off topic)", "If the OP wishes to edit the question, or if someone else wishes", "personally think we should reject the edit and keep the original question closed.", "to receive the votes needed to be reopened. It also seems to stray", "and keep the original question closed. If the OP wishes to edit the", "change the question from focusing on a popular fiction book (which seems clearly", "question. I personally think we should reject the edit and keep the original", "book (which seems clearly off topic) to a hypothetical academic text book. The", "on a popular fiction book (which seems clearly off topic) to a hypothetical", "be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from focusing on", "the original question closed. If the OP wishes to edit the question, or", "the question from focusing on a popular fiction book (which seems clearly off", "edited question seems to be on topic to me and likely to receive", "a book to be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question", "closed question [I want a book to be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language)", "should reject the edit and keep the original question closed. If the OP", "far from the OP’s question. I personally think we should reject the edit", "think we should reject the edit and keep the original question closed. If", "also seems to stray vary far from the OP’s question. I personally think", "A user heavily edited someone else's closed question [I want a book to", "reopened. It also seems to stray vary far from the OP’s question. I", "I personally think we should reject the edit and keep the original question", "clearly off topic) to a hypothetical academic text book. The edited question seems", "be on topic to me and likely to receive the votes needed to", "[I want a book to be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change", "closed. If the OP wishes to edit the question, or if someone else", "receive the votes needed to be reopened. It also seems to stray vary", "and likely to receive the votes needed to be reopened. It also seems", "to be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from focusing", "from focusing on a popular fiction book (which seems clearly off topic) to", "reject the edit and keep the original question closed. If the OP wishes", "question closed. If the OP wishes to edit the question, or if someone", "OP’s question. I personally think we should reject the edit and keep the", "question, or if someone else wishes to ask the new question, they can", "The edited question seems to be on topic to me and likely to", "edited someone else's closed question [I want a book to be translated into", "translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from focusing on a", "native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from focusing on a popular fiction book", "question seems to be on topic to me and likely to receive the", "language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from focusing on a popular fiction book (which", "someone else's closed question [I want a book to be translated into my", "(which seems clearly off topic) to a hypothetical academic text book. The edited", "my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to change the question from focusing on a popular fiction", "hypothetical academic text book. The edited question seems to be on topic to", "keep the original question closed. If the OP wishes to edit the question,", "from the OP’s question. I personally think we should reject the edit and", "stray vary far from the OP’s question. I personally think we should reject", "the votes needed to be reopened. It also seems to stray vary far", "question [I want a book to be translated into my native language?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130945/i-want-a-book-to-be-translated-into-my-native-language) to", "wishes to edit the question, or if someone else wishes to ask the", "text book. The edited question seems to be on topic to me and", "on topic to me and likely to receive the votes needed to be", "the OP wishes to edit the question, or if someone else wishes to" ]
[ "question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note that", "(on-topic) answers already. We already discussed this case here: + [Preserving 'original intent'", "This is not about removing surplus questions when multiple questions are asked at", "to obtain consistency and thus I am asking: *How far should we go", "where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note that there have been other", "another meta question.) This is about questions that have received (on-topic) answers", "establish a guideline regarding this to obtain consistency and thus I am asking:", "fundamentally changes an off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): >", "(If desired, this could be addressed in yet another meta question.) * This", "that such things need to be handled consistently. […] > > > I", "[…] > > > I concur that it would be good to establish", "desired, this could be addressed in yet another meta question.) * This is", "by the OP. I think that such things need to be handled consistently.", "have been edited to change (IMO) the intent as it seemed to be", "would be good to establish a guideline regarding this to obtain consistency and", "handled consistently. […] > > > I concur that it would be good", "[Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit questions to match", "question to prevent closure?** * This is not about removing surplus questions when", "discussed this case here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should", "be good to establish a guideline regarding this to obtain consistency and thus", "guideline regarding this to obtain consistency and thus I am asking: *How far", "> Let me note that there have been other questions here that have", "meta question.) This is about questions that have received (on-topic) answers already.", "to be expressed by the OP. I think that such things need to", "> > > I concur that it would be good to establish a", "> > Let me note that there have been other questions here that", "about removing surplus questions when multiple questions are asked at once. (If desired,", "questions here that have been edited to change (IMO) the intent as it", "expressed by the OP. I think that such things need to be handled", "it seemed to be expressed by the OP. I think that such things", "to establish a guideline regarding this to obtain consistency and thus I am", "edit that fundamentally changes an off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy", "off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me", "at once. (If desired, this could be addressed in yet another meta question.)", "intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit questions to match how they", "that fundamentally changes an off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734):", "'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit questions to match how", "consistency and thus I am asking: *How far should we go when editing", "not about removing surplus questions when multiple questions are asked at once. (If", "intent as it seemed to be expressed by the OP. I think that", "yet another meta question.) This is about questions that have received (on-topic)", "note that there have been other questions here that have been edited to", "change (IMO) the intent as it seemed to be expressed by the OP.", "been other questions here that have been edited to change (IMO) the intent", "a follow-up to [Should we reject an edit that fundamentally changes an off", "We already discussed this case here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734)", "Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note that there have been other questions", "[Should we reject an edit that fundamentally changes an off topic question on", "a question to prevent closure?** * This is not about removing surplus questions", "answers already. We already discussed this case here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in", "thus I am asking: *How far should we go when editing a question", "+ [Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit questions to", "this could be addressed in yet another meta question.) This is about", "once. (If desired, this could be addressed in yet another meta question.) ", "an off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let", "in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit questions to match how they were", "regarding this to obtain consistency and thus I am asking: How far should", "> > I concur that it would be good to establish a guideline", "is about questions that have received (on-topic) answers already. We already discussed this", "How far should we go when editing a question to prevent closure?* ", "we go when editing a question to prevent closure?* * This is not", "* This is about questions that have received (on-topic) answers already. We already", "asked at once. (If desired, this could be addressed in yet another meta", "this case here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we", "the intent as it seemed to be expressed by the OP. I think", "there have been other questions here that have been edited to change (IMO)", "we reject an edit that fundamentally changes an off topic question on translating", "case here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit", "to [Should we reject an edit that fundamentally changes an off topic question", "books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note that there have been", "a guideline regarding this to obtain consistency and thus I am asking: How", "removing surplus questions when multiple questions are asked at once. (If desired, this", "such things need to be handled consistently. […] > > > I concur", "to be handled consistently. […] > > > I concur that it would", "consistently. […] > > > I concur that it would be good to", "am asking: How far should we go when editing a question to prevent", "question.) * This is about questions that have received (on-topic) answers already. We", "I am asking: How far should we go when editing a question to", "should we go when editing a question to prevent closure? * This is", "obtain consistency and thus I am asking: How far should we go when", "asking: How far should we go when editing a question to prevent closure?", "(IMO) the intent as it seemed to be expressed by the OP. I", "on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note that there", "editing a question to prevent closure? * This is not about removing surplus", "and thus I am asking: How far should we go when editing a", "edited to change (IMO) the intent as it seemed to be expressed by", "that it would be good to establish a guideline regarding this to obtain", "questions when multiple questions are asked at once. (If desired, this could be", "here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit questions", "think that such things need to be handled consistently. […] > > >", "that have been edited to change (IMO) the intent as it seemed to", "been edited to change (IMO) the intent as it seemed to be expressed", "when editing a question to prevent closure? * This is not about removing", "have been other questions here that have been edited to change (IMO) the", "this to obtain consistency and thus I am asking: *How far should we", "already. We already discussed this case here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in closed", "good to establish a guideline regarding this to obtain consistency and thus I", "received (on-topic) answers already. We already discussed this case here: + [Preserving 'original", "translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note that there have", "concur that it would be good to establish a guideline regarding this to", "when multiple questions are asked at once. (If desired, this could be addressed", "the OP. I think that such things need to be handled consistently. […]", "have received (on-topic) answers already. We already discussed this case here: + [Preserving", "addressed in yet another meta question.) This is about questions that have", "be addressed in yet another meta question.) * This is about questions that", "topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note", "go when editing a question to prevent closure?** * This is not about", "far should we go when editing a question to prevent closure?** * This", "it would be good to establish a guideline regarding this to obtain consistency", "closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) + [Should we edit questions to match how they were answered?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1151/7734)", "seemed to be expressed by the OP. I think that such things need", "questions that have received (on-topic) answers already. We already discussed this case here:", "as it seemed to be expressed by the OP. I think that such", "* This is not about removing surplus questions when multiple questions are asked", "other questions here that have been edited to change (IMO) the intent as", "This is about questions that have received (on-topic) answers already. We already discussed", "Let me note that there have been other questions here that have been", "me note that there have been other questions here that have been edited", "closure?** * This is not about removing surplus questions when multiple questions are", "surplus questions when multiple questions are asked at once. (If desired, this could", "about questions that have received (on-topic) answers already. We already discussed this case", "things need to be handled consistently. […] > > > I concur that", "that have received (on-topic) answers already. We already discussed this case here: +", "that there have been other questions here that have been edited to change", "reject an edit that fundamentally changes an off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734),", "> I concur that it would be good to establish a guideline regarding", "here that have been edited to change (IMO) the intent as it seemed", "is a follow-up to [Should we reject an edit that fundamentally changes an", "changes an off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where Buffy [remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > >", "could be addressed in yet another meta question.) * This is about questions", "already discussed this case here: + [Preserving 'original intent' in closed questions?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1573/7734) +", "follow-up to [Should we reject an edit that fundamentally changes an off topic", "be expressed by the OP. I think that such things need to be", "This is a follow-up to [Should we reject an edit that fundamentally changes", "in yet another meta question.) * This is about questions that have received", "be handled consistently. […] > > > I concur that it would be", "[remarked](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4492/7734): > > Let me note that there have been other questions here", "OP. I think that such things need to be handled consistently. […] >", "need to be handled consistently. […] > > > I concur that it", "I concur that it would be good to establish a guideline regarding this", "I think that such things need to be handled consistently. […] > >", "to prevent closure?** * This is not about removing surplus questions when multiple", "an edit that fundamentally changes an off topic question on translating books?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4489/7734), where", "questions are asked at once. (If desired, this could be addressed in yet", "prevent closure?** * This is not about removing surplus questions when multiple questions", "are asked at once. (If desired, this could be addressed in yet another", "multiple questions are asked at once. (If desired, this could be addressed in", "is not about removing surplus questions when multiple questions are asked at once.", "to change (IMO) the intent as it seemed to be expressed by the" ]
[ "they on-topic or off-topic? For example, the question [When an academic researcher receives", "on the institution. Ask for a survey = ask for pointers to existing", "the answer depends on the institution. Ask for a survey = ask for", "asking for survey of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic? For example,", "academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if the answer", "regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic? For example, the question [When an academic", "the academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if the", "Ask for a survey = ask for pointers to existing surveys (I'm not", "Are they on-topic or off-topic? For example, the question [When an academic researcher", "a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if the answer depends on the institution.", "answer depends on the institution. Ask for a survey = ask for pointers", "for a survey if the answer depends on the institution. Ask for a", "example, the question [When an academic researcher receives a gift funding from an", "partner, does the academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey", "survey of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic? For example, the question", "receives a gift funding from an industry partner, does the academic researcher's university", "survey if the answer depends on the institution. Ask for a survey =", "for pointers to existing surveys (I'm not talking about surveying Stack Exchange users).", "for survey of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic? For example, the", "our stance regarding questions asking for survey of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic", "researcher receives a gift funding from an industry partner, does the academic researcher's", "academic researcher receives a gift funding from an industry partner, does the academic", "off-topic? For example, the question [When an academic researcher receives a gift funding", "= ask for pointers to existing surveys (I'm not talking about surveying Stack", "the institution. Ask for a survey = ask for pointers to existing surveys", "stance regarding questions asking for survey of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or", "questions asking for survey of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic? For", "institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic? For example, the question [When an", "the question [When an academic researcher receives a gift funding from an industry", "cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if the answer depends on the institution. Ask", "researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if the answer depends", "industry partner, does the academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a", "for a survey = ask for pointers to existing surveys (I'm not talking", "What is our stance regarding questions asking for survey of institution’s regulations? Are", "[When an academic researcher receives a gift funding from an industry partner, does", "of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic? For example, the question [When", "a survey = ask for pointers to existing surveys (I'm not talking about", "gift funding from an industry partner, does the academic researcher's university take a", "on-topic or off-topic? For example, the question [When an academic researcher receives a", "funding from an industry partner, does the academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452)", "asked for a survey if the answer depends on the institution. Ask for", "from an industry partner, does the academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked", "For example, the question [When an academic researcher receives a gift funding from", "regarding questions asking for survey of institution’s regulations? Are they on-topic or off-topic?", "a survey if the answer depends on the institution. Ask for a survey", "is our stance regarding questions asking for survey of institution’s regulations? Are they", "or off-topic? For example, the question [When an academic researcher receives a gift", "question [When an academic researcher receives a gift funding from an industry partner,", "a gift funding from an industry partner, does the academic researcher's university take", "university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if the answer depends on", "does the academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if", "institution. Ask for a survey = ask for pointers to existing surveys (I'm", "take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for a survey if the answer depends on the", "depends on the institution. Ask for a survey = ask for pointers to", "an academic researcher receives a gift funding from an industry partner, does the", "ask for pointers to existing surveys (I'm not talking about surveying Stack Exchange", "if the answer depends on the institution. Ask for a survey = ask", "an industry partner, does the academic researcher's university take a cut?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/131793/452) asked for", "survey = ask for pointers to existing surveys (I'm not talking about surveying" ]
[ "I'm even considering just deleting questions after I get a satisfying response, but", "about what information I disclose, my field being one of them. My specific", "there is some way around this-- i.e., how to guard my privacy while", "I've been using academic.stackexchange quite enthusiastically during a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship.", "for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I disclose my", "enough information for an apt answer? I've already hidden other SE groups that", "to ask are rather sensitive, I am careful about what information I disclose,", "to old usernames remain). I completely understand that practices change from field to", "get a satisfying response, but I know that defies the point of SE.", "I disclose my field in order to answer my question. I'm wondering if", "for an apt answer? I've already hidden other SE groups that I'm a", "field to field (and even from subfield to subfield). Yet there are real", "in my questions. I've noticed others doing the same, probably for similar reasons.", "on top of the other personal clues I've given in my questions. I've", "the other personal clues I've given in my questions. I've noticed others doing", "at stake. I'm even considering just deleting questions after I get a satisfying", "field on top of the other personal clues I've given in my questions.", "the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related, but does not deal with", "out who I am if I disclosed my field on top of the", "question. I'm wondering if there is some way around this-- i.e., how to", "am a young researcher and since some of the questions I want to", "still offering enough information for an apt answer? I've already hidden other SE", "response, but I know that defies the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is", "a young researcher and since some of the questions I want to ask", "if there is some way around this-- i.e., how to guard my privacy", "guard my privacy while still offering enough information for an apt answer? I've", "(but I doubt that would deter an eager detective; at some point SE", "point SE was even storing old usernames publicly, and @ tags to old", "much effort to figure out who I am if I disclosed my field", "usernames remain). I completely understand that practices change from field to field (and", "how to guard my privacy while still offering enough information for an apt", "satisfying response, but I know that defies the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields)", "considering just deleting questions after I get a satisfying response, but I know", "even storing old usernames publicly, and @ tags to old usernames remain). I", "probably for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I disclose", "it wouldn't take much effort to figure out who I am if I", "are real privacy issues at stake. I'm even considering just deleting questions after", "doubt that would deter an eager detective; at some point SE was even", "while still offering enough information for an apt answer? I've already hidden other", "take much effort to figure out who I am if I disclosed my", "are rather sensitive, I am careful about what information I disclose, my field", "reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I disclose my field in", "field (and even from subfield to subfield). Yet there are real privacy issues", "deter an eager detective; at some point SE was even storing old usernames", "disclosed my field on top of the other personal clues I've given in", "and it wouldn't take much effort to figure out who I am if", "in order to answer my question. I'm wondering if there is some way", "using academic.stackexchange quite enthusiastically during a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since", "issues at stake. I'm even considering just deleting questions after I get a", "figure out who I am if I disclosed my field on top of", "them. My specific field is small, and it wouldn't take much effort to", "been using academic.stackexchange quite enthusiastically during a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However,", "I disclose, my field being one of them. My specific field is small,", "would deter an eager detective; at some point SE was even storing old", "a satisfying response, but I know that defies the point of SE. [This", "personal clues I've given in my questions. I've noticed others doing the same,", "information I disclose, my field being one of them. My specific field is", "of, and changed my username (but I doubt that would deter an eager", "subfield to subfield). Yet there are real privacy issues at stake. I'm even", "am careful about what information I disclose, my field being one of them.", "i.e., how to guard my privacy while still offering enough information for an", "my field in order to answer my question. I'm wondering if there is", "However, since I am a young researcher and since some of the questions", "I am careful about what information I disclose, my field being one of", "ask are rather sensitive, I am careful about what information I disclose, my", "field being one of them. My specific field is small, and it wouldn't", "apt answer? I've already hidden other SE groups that I'm a member of,", "that would deter an eager detective; at some point SE was even storing", "understand that practices change from field to field (and even from subfield to", "point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related, but does not deal with privacy.", "change from field to field (and even from subfield to subfield). Yet there", "after I get a satisfying response, but I know that defies the point", "I am a young researcher and since some of the questions I want", "some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I disclose my field in order to", "an apt answer? I've already hidden other SE groups that I'm a member", "want to ask are rather sensitive, I am careful about what information I", "that I'm a member of, and changed my username (but I doubt that", "I want to ask are rather sensitive, I am careful about what information", "who I am if I disclosed my field on top of the other", "some of the questions I want to ask are rather sensitive, I am", "noticed others doing the same, probably for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather", "changed my username (but I doubt that would deter an eager detective; at", "and since some of the questions I want to ask are rather sensitive,", "doing the same, probably for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist", "an eager detective; at some point SE was even storing old usernames publicly,", "sensitive, I am careful about what information I disclose, my field being one", "if I disclosed my field on top of the other personal clues I've", "I doubt that would deter an eager detective; at some point SE was", "questions. I've noticed others doing the same, probably for similar reasons. However, some", "was even storing old usernames publicly, and @ tags to old usernames remain).", "know that defies the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related, but does", "to guard my privacy while still offering enough information for an apt answer?", "questions after I get a satisfying response, but I know that defies the", "a member of, and changed my username (but I doubt that would deter", "my field being one of them. My specific field is small, and it", "information for an apt answer? I've already hidden other SE groups that I'm", "is small, and it wouldn't take much effort to figure out who I", "and changed my username (but I doubt that would deter an eager detective;", "I completely understand that practices change from field to field (and even from", "would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I disclose my field in order to answer", "I disclosed my field on top of the other personal clues I've given", "I've given in my questions. I've noticed others doing the same, probably for", "since I am a young researcher and since some of the questions I", "username (but I doubt that would deter an eager detective; at some point", "My specific field is small, and it wouldn't take much effort to figure", "deleting questions after I get a satisfying response, but I know that defies", "remain). I completely understand that practices change from field to field (and even", "that I disclose my field in order to answer my question. I'm wondering", "even from subfield to subfield). Yet there are real privacy issues at stake.", "member of, and changed my username (but I doubt that would deter an", "but I know that defies the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related,", "old usernames remain). I completely understand that practices change from field to field", "tags to old usernames remain). I completely understand that practices change from field", "one of them. My specific field is small, and it wouldn't take much", "being one of them. My specific field is small, and it wouldn't take", "mentorship. However, since I am a young researcher and since some of the", "clues I've given in my questions. I've noticed others doing the same, probably", "hidden other SE groups that I'm a member of, and changed my username", "academic.stackexchange quite enthusiastically during a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since I", "some way around this-- i.e., how to guard my privacy while still offering", "researcher and since some of the questions I want to ask are rather", "given in my questions. I've noticed others doing the same, probably for similar", "same, probably for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I", "disclose my field in order to answer my question. I'm wondering if there", "old usernames publicly, and @ tags to old usernames remain). I completely understand", "disclose, my field being one of them. My specific field is small, and", "real privacy issues at stake. I'm even considering just deleting questions after I", "rather aggressively insist that I disclose my field in order to answer my", "publicly, and @ tags to old usernames remain). I completely understand that practices", "I know that defies the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related, but", "usernames publicly, and @ tags to old usernames remain). I completely understand that", "groups that I'm a member of, and changed my username (but I doubt", "completely understand that practices change from field to field (and even from subfield", "SE groups that I'm a member of, and changed my username (but I", "my question. I'm wondering if there is some way around this-- i.e., how", "way around this-- i.e., how to guard my privacy while still offering enough", "privacy issues at stake. I'm even considering just deleting questions after I get", "aggressively insist that I disclose my field in order to answer my question.", "answer my question. I'm wondering if there is some way around this-- i.e.,", "quite enthusiastically during a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since I am", "enthusiastically during a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since I am a", "the same, probably for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that", "Yet there are real privacy issues at stake. I'm even considering just deleting", "I am if I disclosed my field on top of the other personal", "of the other personal clues I've given in my questions. I've noticed others", "field is small, and it wouldn't take much effort to figure out who", "answer? I've already hidden other SE groups that I'm a member of, and", "there are real privacy issues at stake. I'm even considering just deleting questions", "this-- i.e., how to guard my privacy while still offering enough information for", "that practices change from field to field (and even from subfield to subfield).", "what information I disclose, my field being one of them. My specific field", "order to answer my question. I'm wondering if there is some way around", "the questions I want to ask are rather sensitive, I am careful about", "I'm a member of, and changed my username (but I doubt that would", "I'm wondering if there is some way around this-- i.e., how to guard", "am if I disclosed my field on top of the other personal clues", "to subfield). Yet there are real privacy issues at stake. I'm even considering", "wouldn't take much effort to figure out who I am if I disclosed", "others doing the same, probably for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively", "some point SE was even storing old usernames publicly, and @ tags to", "during a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since I am a young", "(and even from subfield to subfield). Yet there are real privacy issues at", "postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since I am a young researcher and since", "my field on top of the other personal clues I've given in my", "rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since I am a young researcher and", "other personal clues I've given in my questions. I've noticed others doing the", "to figure out who I am if I disclosed my field on top", "of mentorship. However, since I am a young researcher and since some of", "other SE groups that I'm a member of, and changed my username (but", "to field (and even from subfield to subfield). Yet there are real privacy", "careful about what information I disclose, my field being one of them. My", "specific field is small, and it wouldn't take much effort to figure out", "SE was even storing old usernames publicly, and @ tags to old usernames", "at some point SE was even storing old usernames publicly, and @ tags", "detective; at some point SE was even storing old usernames publicly, and @", "is some way around this-- i.e., how to guard my privacy while still", "top of the other personal clues I've given in my questions. I've noticed", "I've noticed others doing the same, probably for similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers", "questions I want to ask are rather sensitive, I am careful about what", "rather sensitive, I am careful about what information I disclose, my field being", "defies the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related, but does not deal", "devoid of mentorship. However, since I am a young researcher and since some", "a rough postdoc devoid of mentorship. However, since I am a young researcher", "of the questions I want to ask are rather sensitive, I am careful", "my privacy while still offering enough information for an apt answer? I've already", "stake. I'm even considering just deleting questions after I get a satisfying response,", "to answer my question. I'm wondering if there is some way around this--", "just deleting questions after I get a satisfying response, but I know that", "around this-- i.e., how to guard my privacy while still offering enough information", "that defies the point of SE. [This question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/72/how-to-deal-with-different-disciplines-fields) is related, but does not", "storing old usernames publicly, and @ tags to old usernames remain). I completely", "subfield). Yet there are real privacy issues at stake. I'm even considering just", "and @ tags to old usernames remain). I completely understand that practices change", "However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I disclose my field in order", "from field to field (and even from subfield to subfield). Yet there are", "similar reasons. However, some would-be-answerers rather aggressively insist that I disclose my field", "insist that I disclose my field in order to answer my question. I'm", "privacy while still offering enough information for an apt answer? I've already hidden", "already hidden other SE groups that I'm a member of, and changed my", "@ tags to old usernames remain). I completely understand that practices change from", "my questions. I've noticed others doing the same, probably for similar reasons. However,", "I get a satisfying response, but I know that defies the point of", "offering enough information for an apt answer? I've already hidden other SE groups", "small, and it wouldn't take much effort to figure out who I am", "wondering if there is some way around this-- i.e., how to guard my", "eager detective; at some point SE was even storing old usernames publicly, and", "field in order to answer my question. I'm wondering if there is some", "my username (but I doubt that would deter an eager detective; at some", "young researcher and since some of the questions I want to ask are", "I've already hidden other SE groups that I'm a member of, and changed", "practices change from field to field (and even from subfield to subfield). Yet", "since some of the questions I want to ask are rather sensitive, I", "from subfield to subfield). Yet there are real privacy issues at stake. I'm", "even considering just deleting questions after I get a satisfying response, but I", "of them. My specific field is small, and it wouldn't take much effort", "effort to figure out who I am if I disclosed my field on" ]
[ "issue above\". 2. Remove that the person was fired. If one thinks that", "original was, I find the words \"other misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat", "too weak to me and sounds like \"similar to the weighting issue above\".", "maybe there are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to me", "irrelevant, I think one should consequently also remove that the person was fired.", "and somewhat offensive because of events in my social circle. Based on a", "to the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that the person was fired. If", "forced himself on a secretary\". This was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what", "(My English is not so good, maybe there are better words than \"horrible\".", "I propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\"", "the original question a situation where somebody was fired because \"he forced himself", "where somebody was fired because \"he forced himself on a secretary\". This was", "Remove that the person was fired. If one thinks that the reason of", "one should consequently also remove that the person was fired. After all, it", "me and sounds like \"similar to the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that", "that the person was fired. If one thinks that the reason of the", "to the following question: [Should I intervene when a colleague in a different", "was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original was, I find the", "comment there encouraging users to check out the edit history. Indeed, I did", "this but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one should ask on", "to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original was, I find the words \"other", "B. Gobmewd described in the original question a situation where somebody was fired", "After all, it is not relevant to the story B. Gobmewd is telling.", "deads\" etc. (My English is not so good, maybe there are better words", "fired. If one thinks that the reason of the misconduct is irrelevant, I", "there are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to me and", "consequently also remove that the person was fired. After all, it is not", "relevant to the story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a comment there", "circle. Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to edit", "that the reason of the misconduct is irrelevant, I think one should consequently", "also remove that the person was fired. After all, it is not relevant", "\"Other\" sounds too weak to me and sounds like \"similar to the weighting", "Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc.", "Hеllo, I am asking here regarding the answer of user B. Gobmewd to", "in my social circle. Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking", "not relevant to the story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a comment", "of the misconduct is irrelevant, I think one should consequently also remove that", "fired. After all, it is not relevant to the story B. Gobmewd is", "because \"he forced himself on a secretary\". This was edited to \"other misconduct\".", "part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the original question a situation", "because of events in my social circle. Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft,", "by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to edit this. I propose three solutions:", "so good, maybe there are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak", "not so good, maybe there are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too", "I think one should consequently also remove that the person was fired. After", "run laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the original", "but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one should ask on Meta", "B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a comment there encouraging users to check", "the words \"other misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat offensive because of events", "or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English is not so good, maybe there", "am asking here regarding the answer of user B. Gobmewd to the following", "[Should I intervene when a colleague in a different department makes students run", "himself on a secretary\". This was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the", "find the words \"other misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat offensive because of", "described in the original question a situation where somebody was fired because \"he", "intervene when a colleague in a different department makes students run laps as", "a different department makes students run laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B.", "than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to me and sounds like \"similar to", "my social circle. Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here", "regarding the answer of user B. Gobmewd to the following question: [Should I", "think one should consequently also remove that the person was fired. After all,", "should consequently also remove that the person was fired. After all, it is", "sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English is not so good,", "on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to edit this. I", "as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the original question a", "events in my social circle. Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am", "like \"similar to the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that the person was", "here regarding the answer of user B. Gobmewd to the following question: [Should", "to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English is not", "colleague in a different department makes students run laps as part of their", "edit this. I propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for", "asking here to edit this. I propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for other", "horrible deads\" etc. (My English is not so good, maybe there are better", "history. Indeed, I did this but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that", "thinks that the reason of the misconduct is irrelevant, I think one should", "misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat offensive because of events in my social", "asking here regarding the answer of user B. Gobmewd to the following question:", "original question a situation where somebody was fired because \"he forced himself on", "words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to me and sounds like \"similar", "to the story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a comment there encouraging", "following question: [Should I intervene when a colleague in a different department makes", "I did this but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one should", "is not so good, maybe there are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds", "in a different department makes students run laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run)", "sounds like \"similar to the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that the person", "the edit history. Indeed, I did this but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft", "other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English", "the misconduct is irrelevant, I think one should consequently also remove that the", "three solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for", "secretary\". This was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original was, I", "far too weak and somewhat offensive because of events in my social circle.", "the answer of user B. Gobmewd to the following question: [Should I intervene", "propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or", "are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to me and sounds", "This was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original was, I find", "reason of the misconduct is irrelevant, I think one should consequently also remove", "\"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original was, I find the words \"other misconduct\"", "Put a comment there encouraging users to check out the edit history. Indeed,", "question a situation where somebody was fired because \"he forced himself on a", "makes students run laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in", "was, I find the words \"other misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat offensive", "3. Put a comment there encouraging users to check out the edit history.", "is not relevant to the story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a", "the reason of the misconduct is irrelevant, I think one should consequently also", "better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to me and sounds like", "English is not so good, maybe there are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\"", "in the original question a situation where somebody was fired because \"he forced", "the person was fired. If one thinks that the reason of the misconduct", "users to check out the edit history. Indeed, I did this but it", "\"similar to the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that the person was fired.", "above\". 2. Remove that the person was fired. If one thinks that the", "good, maybe there are better words than \"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to", "it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one should ask on Meta for", "the following question: [Should I intervene when a colleague in a different department", "I find the words \"other misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat offensive because", "answer of user B. Gobmewd to the following question: [Should I intervene when", "was fired. If one thinks that the reason of the misconduct is irrelevant,", "misconduct\". Knowing what the original was, I find the words \"other misconduct\" far", "was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one should ask on Meta for editing.", "\"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English is not so", "check out the edit history. Indeed, I did this but it was removed.", "Indeed, I did this but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one", "of user B. Gobmewd to the following question: [Should I intervene when a", "I intervene when a colleague in a different department makes students run laps", "2. Remove that the person was fired. If one thinks that the reason", "that the person was fired. After all, it is not relevant to the", "to edit this. I propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to", "social circle. Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to", "\"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My", "somewhat offensive because of events in my social circle. Based on a recommendation", "person was fired. After all, it is not relevant to the story B.", "edit history. Indeed, I did this but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented", "their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the original question a situation where somebody", "I am asking here to edit this. I propose three solutions: 1. Change", "words \"other misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat offensive because of events in", "and sounds like \"similar to the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that the", "telling. 3. Put a comment there encouraging users to check out the edit", "situation where somebody was fired because \"he forced himself on a secretary\". This", "the original was, I find the words \"other misconduct\" far too weak and", "weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that the person was fired. If one thinks", "the person was fired. After all, it is not relevant to the story", "Gobmewd described in the original question a situation where somebody was fired because", "of events in my social circle. Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I", "is irrelevant, I think one should consequently also remove that the person was", "remove that the person was fired. After all, it is not relevant to", "a colleague in a different department makes students run laps as part of", "weak to me and sounds like \"similar to the weighting issue above\". 2.", "the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove that the person was fired. If one", "when a colleague in a different department makes students run laps as part", "Based on a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to edit this.", "offensive because of events in my social circle. Based on a recommendation by", "solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible", "a recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to edit this. I propose", "edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original was, I find the words", "a situation where somebody was fired because \"he forced himself on a secretary\".", "sounds too weak to me and sounds like \"similar to the weighting issue", "weak and somewhat offensive because of events in my social circle. Based on", "a secretary\". This was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original was,", "user B. Gobmewd to the following question: [Should I intervene when a colleague", "Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to edit this. I propose three solutions: 1.", "encouraging users to check out the edit history. Indeed, I did this but", "did this but it was removed. Instead, Wrzlprmft commented that one should ask", "a comment there encouraging users to check out the edit history. Indeed, I", "person was fired. If one thinks that the reason of the misconduct is", "\"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English is not so good, maybe there are", "etc. (My English is not so good, maybe there are better words than", "Knowing what the original was, I find the words \"other misconduct\" far too", "somebody was fired because \"he forced himself on a secretary\". This was edited", "here to edit this. I propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\"", "misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English is not so good, maybe", "1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\"", "all, it is not relevant to the story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3.", "fired because \"he forced himself on a secretary\". This was edited to \"other", "it is not relevant to the story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put", "am asking here to edit this. I propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for", "grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the original question a situation where somebody was", "students run laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the", "laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the original question", "to check out the edit history. Indeed, I did this but it was", "If one thinks that the reason of the misconduct is irrelevant, I think", "Gobmewd to the following question: [Should I intervene when a colleague in a", "to me and sounds like \"similar to the weighting issue above\". 2. Remove", "of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described in the original question a situation where", "there encouraging users to check out the edit history. Indeed, I did this", "was fired because \"he forced himself on a secretary\". This was edited to", "\"horrible\". \"Other\" sounds too weak to me and sounds like \"similar to the", "was fired. After all, it is not relevant to the story B. Gobmewd", "I am asking here regarding the answer of user B. Gobmewd to the", "different department makes students run laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd", "too weak and somewhat offensive because of events in my social circle. Based", "B. Gobmewd to the following question: [Should I intervene when a colleague in", "recommendation by Wrzlprmft, I am asking here to edit this. I propose three", "misconduct\" to \"for sexual misconduct\" or \"for horrible deads\" etc. (My English is", "\"he forced himself on a secretary\". This was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing", "Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a comment there encouraging users to check out", "department makes students run laps as part of their grade?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134002/should-i-intervene-when-a-colleague-in-a-different-department-makes-students-run) B. Gobmewd described", "misconduct is irrelevant, I think one should consequently also remove that the person", "on a secretary\". This was edited to \"other misconduct\". Knowing what the original", "this. I propose three solutions: 1. Change \"for other misconduct\" to \"for sexual", "out the edit history. Indeed, I did this but it was removed. Instead,", "one thinks that the reason of the misconduct is irrelevant, I think one", "the story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a comment there encouraging users", "\"other misconduct\" far too weak and somewhat offensive because of events in my", "story B. Gobmewd is telling. 3. Put a comment there encouraging users to", "question: [Should I intervene when a colleague in a different department makes students", "what the original was, I find the words \"other misconduct\" far too weak", "is telling. 3. Put a comment there encouraging users to check out the" ]
[ "suicide as her life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit", "her life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit it and", "life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit it and make", "apologies for [Daughter wants to advocate physician-assisted suicide as her life goal. Shall", "she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit it and make it on-topic? Thanks!", "to advocate physician-assisted suicide as her life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How", "advocate physician-assisted suicide as her life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do", "physician-assisted suicide as her life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I", "goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit it and make it", "Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit it and make it on-topic?", "as her life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817). How do I edit it", "wants to advocate physician-assisted suicide as her life goal. Shall she be professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/134238/75817).", "for [Daughter wants to advocate physician-assisted suicide as her life goal. Shall she", "[Daughter wants to advocate physician-assisted suicide as her life goal. Shall she be", "Many apologies for [Daughter wants to advocate physician-assisted suicide as her life goal." ]
[ "good answer. The gist of it is, that for this particular stack exchange,", "social consensus will only point to the answers which ought to be how", "this particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought to be linked to reputation stakes,", "I have been thinking about the general model on which the stack exchange", "and academic staff (research assistants, like myself), I feel that verified faculty ought", "things are, and might not really reflect reality. Without going into the details,", "answers from people who may not have experience in the area in which", "how one's research might be judged and gains upvotes (or simply has no", "and gains upvotes (or simply has no downvotes which are visible), then the", "credentials ought to be linked to reputation stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes.", "academic staff (research assistants, like myself), I feel that verified faculty ought to", "qualifications of the people answering ought to be more important. After all, the", "the people answering ought to be more important. After all, the social consensus", "the qualifications of the people answering ought to be more important. After all,", "fewer than the number of students and academic staff (research assistants, like myself),", "therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of the", "socially recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario,", "might not really reflect reality. Without going into the details, if someone who", "the general model on which the stack exchange sites work and I feel", "to prove their experience in a socially recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore", "reflect reality. Without going into the details, if someone who has never been", "upvotes (or simply has no downvotes which are visible), then the person asking", "time going to be fewer than the number of students and academic staff", "of downvotes. Given that the number of faculty active here is at any", "sites work and I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model is", "have been thinking about the general model on which the stack exchange sites", "(or simply has no downvotes which are visible), then the person asking the", "is not getting a good answer. The gist of it is, that for", "at any point in time going to be fewer than the number of", "to allow answers from people who may not have experience in the area", "essentially that lay practitioners are able to prove their experience in a socially", "be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow answers from people", "details, if someone who has never been on say, a faculty hiring committee,", "people answering ought to be more important. After all, the social consensus will", "people who may not have experience in the area in which the answer", "a socially recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this", "into the details, if someone who has never been on say, a faculty", "than the number of students and academic staff (research assistants, like myself), I", "point in time going to be fewer than the number of students and", "may not have experience in the area in which the answer is being", "Is it meaningful to allow answers from people who may not have experience", "to be more important. After all, the social consensus will only point to", "thinking about the general model on which the stack exchange sites work and", "be more important. After all, the social consensus will only point to the", "general model on which the stack exchange sites work and I feel like", "of students and academic staff (research assistants, like myself), I feel that verified", "flawed. The model is essentially that lay practitioners are able to prove their", "to the answers which ought to be how things are, and might not", "feel that verified faculty ought to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it", "no downvotes which are visible), then the person asking the question is not", "Given that the number of faculty active here is at any point in", "awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow answers from people who", "exchange sites work and I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model", "it is, that for this particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought to be", "faculty ought to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow", "to answer how one's research might be judged and gains upvotes (or simply", "answering ought to be more important. After all, the social consensus will only", "rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow answers from people who may not", "research might be judged and gains upvotes (or simply has no downvotes which", "one's research might be judged and gains upvotes (or simply has no downvotes", "which are visible), then the person asking the question is not getting a", "has never been on say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer how", "to be fewer than the number of students and academic staff (research assistants,", "of the people answering ought to be more important. After all, the social", "academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model is essentially that lay practitioners are able", "myself), I feel that verified faculty ought to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr:", "prove their experience in a socially recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore granted", "more important. After all, the social consensus will only point to the answers", "who may not have experience in the area in which the answer is", "on say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer how one's research might", "After all, the social consensus will only point to the answers which ought", "faculty active here is at any point in time going to be fewer", "only point to the answers which ought to be how things are, and", "answer how one's research might be judged and gains upvotes (or simply has", "are able to prove their experience in a socially recognized way (upvotes) and", "answer. The gist of it is, that for this particular stack exchange, proving", "be fewer than the number of students and academic staff (research assistants, like", "asking the question is not getting a good answer. The gist of it", "to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow answers from", "consensus will only point to the answers which ought to be how things", "downvotes. Given that the number of faculty active here is at any point", "how things are, and might not really reflect reality. Without going into the", "been on say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer how one's research", "to be linked to reputation stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes. Given that", "rather flawed. The model is essentially that lay practitioners are able to prove", "number of students and academic staff (research assistants, like myself), I feel that", "staff (research assistants, like myself), I feel that verified faculty ought to be", "and I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model is essentially that", "and might not really reflect reality. Without going into the details, if someone", "to reputation stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes. Given that the number of", "active here is at any point in time going to be fewer than", "gist of it is, that for this particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought", "way (upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia, however,", "like myself), I feel that verified faculty ought to be awarded downvote rights.", "which ought to be how things are, and might not really reflect reality.", "model on which the stack exchange sites work and I feel like academia.stackexchange", "lay practitioners are able to prove their experience in a socially recognized way", "allow answers from people who may not have experience in the area in", "the stack exchange sites work and I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed.", "say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer how one's research might be", "and are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications", "reputation stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes. Given that the number of faculty", "The gist of it is, that for this particular stack exchange, proving credentials", "assistants, like myself), I feel that verified faculty ought to be awarded downvote", "the answers which ought to be how things are, and might not really", "are, and might not really reflect reality. Without going into the details, if", "question is not getting a good answer. The gist of it is, that", "important. After all, the social consensus will only point to the answers which", "reality. Without going into the details, if someone who has never been on", "that for this particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought to be linked to", "of faculty active here is at any point in time going to be", "is at any point in time going to be fewer than the number", "terms of downvotes. Given that the number of faculty active here is at", "scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of the people answering ought to be more", "In this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of the people answering ought to", "I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model is essentially that lay", "hiring committee, rushes to answer how one's research might be judged and gains", "which the stack exchange sites work and I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather", "of it is, that for this particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought to", "number of faculty active here is at any point in time going to", "here is at any point in time going to be fewer than the", "if someone who has never been on say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes", "the person asking the question is not getting a good answer. The gist", "stack exchange sites work and I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The", "practitioners are able to prove their experience in a socially recognized way (upvotes)", "the number of faculty active here is at any point in time going", "granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of the people", "be how things are, and might not really reflect reality. Without going into", "that lay practitioners are able to prove their experience in a socially recognized", "not really reflect reality. Without going into the details, if someone who has", "be linked to reputation stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes. Given that the", "to be how things are, and might not really reflect reality. Without going", "not have experience in the area in which the answer is being sought?", "might be judged and gains upvotes (or simply has no downvotes which are", "is rather flawed. The model is essentially that lay practitioners are able to", "has no downvotes which are visible), then the person asking the question is", "proving credentials ought to be linked to reputation stakes, atleast in terms of", "meaningful to allow answers from people who may not have experience in the", "academia, however, the qualifications of the people answering ought to be more important.", "corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of the people answering", "on which the stack exchange sites work and I feel like academia.stackexchange is", "downvotes which are visible), then the person asking the question is not getting", "students and academic staff (research assistants, like myself), I feel that verified faculty", "from people who may not have experience in the area in which the", "tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow answers from people who may not have", "in time going to be fewer than the number of students and academic", "experience in a socially recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding privileges.", "linked to reputation stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes. Given that the number", "particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought to be linked to reputation stakes, atleast", "that verified faculty ought to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful", "are visible), then the person asking the question is not getting a good", "who has never been on say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer", "visible), then the person asking the question is not getting a good answer.", "judged and gains upvotes (or simply has no downvotes which are visible), then", "all, the social consensus will only point to the answers which ought to", "the details, if someone who has never been on say, a faculty hiring", "never been on say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer how one's", "faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer how one's research might be judged and", "someone who has never been on say, a faculty hiring committee, rushes to", "I feel that verified faculty ought to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is", "however, the qualifications of the people answering ought to be more important. After", "it meaningful to allow answers from people who may not have experience in", "any point in time going to be fewer than the number of students", "answers which ought to be how things are, and might not really reflect", "going into the details, if someone who has never been on say, a", "privileges. In this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of the people answering ought", "the number of students and academic staff (research assistants, like myself), I feel", "model is essentially that lay practitioners are able to prove their experience in", "committee, rushes to answer how one's research might be judged and gains upvotes", "a good answer. The gist of it is, that for this particular stack", "the social consensus will only point to the answers which ought to be", "stack exchange, proving credentials ought to be linked to reputation stakes, atleast in", "that the number of faculty active here is at any point in time", "able to prove their experience in a socially recognized way (upvotes) and are", "their experience in a socially recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding", "really reflect reality. Without going into the details, if someone who has never", "(research assistants, like myself), I feel that verified faculty ought to be awarded", "atleast in terms of downvotes. Given that the number of faculty active here", "feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model is essentially that lay practitioners", "rushes to answer how one's research might be judged and gains upvotes (or", "ought to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow answers", "in a socially recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In", "work and I feel like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model is essentially", "The model is essentially that lay practitioners are able to prove their experience", "ought to be more important. After all, the social consensus will only point", "will only point to the answers which ought to be how things are,", "verified faculty ought to be awarded downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to", "gains upvotes (or simply has no downvotes which are visible), then the person", "(upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia, however, the", "point to the answers which ought to be how things are, and might", "downvote rights. tl;dr: Is it meaningful to allow answers from people who may", "Without going into the details, if someone who has never been on say,", "not getting a good answer. The gist of it is, that for this", "simply has no downvotes which are visible), then the person asking the question", "ought to be how things are, and might not really reflect reality. Without", "the question is not getting a good answer. The gist of it is,", "been thinking about the general model on which the stack exchange sites work", "exchange, proving credentials ought to be linked to reputation stakes, atleast in terms", "is, that for this particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought to be linked", "for this particular stack exchange, proving credentials ought to be linked to reputation", "in terms of downvotes. Given that the number of faculty active here is", "about the general model on which the stack exchange sites work and I", "recognized way (upvotes) and are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia,", "a faculty hiring committee, rushes to answer how one's research might be judged", "going to be fewer than the number of students and academic staff (research", "be judged and gains upvotes (or simply has no downvotes which are visible),", "stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes. Given that the number of faculty active", "this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of the people answering ought to be", "then the person asking the question is not getting a good answer. The", "like academia.stackexchange is rather flawed. The model is essentially that lay practitioners are", "are therefore granted corresponding privileges. In this scenario, academia, however, the qualifications of", "person asking the question is not getting a good answer. The gist of", "ought to be linked to reputation stakes, atleast in terms of downvotes. Given", "is essentially that lay practitioners are able to prove their experience in a", "getting a good answer. The gist of it is, that for this particular" ]
[ "appropriate for this site. Can you help me tell if it is okay", "if it is okay to ask here? If not, can you point to", "> I consider myself part of the community of scholars. I have a", "publish. They say: “The only people who would care are the competition.” I've", "tell me that I can't publish, if the content isn't theirs and/or isn't", "that I was planning to publish. They shared it internally, and the company", "forum? > > I consider myself part of the community of scholars. I", "They say: “The only people who would care are the competition.” I've put", "to ask the following question, but am not sure if it is appropriate", "company requests that I not publish. They say: “The only people who would", "they have the right to do that, to tell me that I can't", "I consider myself part of the community of scholars. I have a few", "the community of scholars. I have a few publications, but have worked (hard)", "not, can you point to a better forum? > > I consider myself", "and the company requests that I not publish. They say: “The only people", "care are the competition.” I've put some decent hours in it. Do they", "competition.” I've put some decent hours in it. Do they have the right", "worked (hard) in industry for more than a decade. > > > I", "following question, but am not sure if it is appropriate for this site.", "but have worked (hard) in industry for more than a decade. > >", "me tell if it is okay to ask here? If not, can you", "some decent hours in it. Do they have the right to do that,", "ask here? If not, can you point to a better forum? > >", "to tell me that I can't publish, if the content isn't theirs and/or", "am not sure if it is appropriate for this site. Can you help", "who would care are the competition.” I've put some decent hours in it.", "it internally, and the company requests that I not publish. They say: “The", "at a former employer, review a paper that I was planning to publish.", "review a paper that I was planning to publish. They shared it internally,", "not sure if it is appropriate for this site. Can you help me", "scholars. I have a few publications, but have worked (hard) in industry for", "consider myself part of the community of scholars. I have a few publications,", "a decade. > > > I had a former colleague, one who works", "only people who would care are the competition.” I've put some decent hours", "former employer, review a paper that I was planning to publish. They shared", "shared it internally, and the company requests that I not publish. They say:", "had a former colleague, one who works at a former employer, review a", "for this site. Can you help me tell if it is okay to", "I had a former colleague, one who works at a former employer, review", "planning to publish. They shared it internally, and the company requests that I", "community of scholars. I have a few publications, but have worked (hard) in", "have the right to do that, to tell me that I can't publish,", "can't publish, if the content isn't theirs and/or isn't (remotely) confidential? > >", "it is appropriate for this site. Can you help me tell if it", "put some decent hours in it. Do they have the right to do", "right to do that, to tell me that I can't publish, if the", "Can you help me tell if it is okay to ask here? If", "I want to ask the following question, but am not sure if it", "Do they have the right to do that, to tell me that I", "better forum? > > I consider myself part of the community of scholars.", "industry for more than a decade. > > > I had a former", "it. Do they have the right to do that, to tell me that", "who works at a former employer, review a paper that I was planning", "that I can't publish, if the content isn't theirs and/or isn't (remotely) confidential?", "the competition.” I've put some decent hours in it. Do they have the", "was planning to publish. They shared it internally, and the company requests that", "hours in it. Do they have the right to do that, to tell", "is okay to ask here? If not, can you point to a better", "you help me tell if it is okay to ask here? If not,", "want to ask the following question, but am not sure if it is", "few publications, but have worked (hard) in industry for more than a decade.", "in it. Do they have the right to do that, to tell me", "part of the community of scholars. I have a few publications, but have", "this site. Can you help me tell if it is okay to ask", "one who works at a former employer, review a paper that I was", "me that I can't publish, if the content isn't theirs and/or isn't (remotely)", "sure if it is appropriate for this site. Can you help me tell", "publish. They shared it internally, and the company requests that I not publish.", "can you point to a better forum? > > I consider myself part", "employer, review a paper that I was planning to publish. They shared it", "point to a better forum? > > I consider myself part of the", "works at a former employer, review a paper that I was planning to", "that I not publish. They say: “The only people who would care are", "“The only people who would care are the competition.” I've put some decent", "ask the following question, but am not sure if it is appropriate for", "question, but am not sure if it is appropriate for this site. Can", "the right to do that, to tell me that I can't publish, if", "in industry for more than a decade. > > > I had a", "paper that I was planning to publish. They shared it internally, and the", "a few publications, but have worked (hard) in industry for more than a", "a paper that I was planning to publish. They shared it internally, and", "say: “The only people who would care are the competition.” I've put some", "internally, and the company requests that I not publish. They say: “The only", "but am not sure if it is appropriate for this site. Can you", "would care are the competition.” I've put some decent hours in it. Do", "is appropriate for this site. Can you help me tell if it is", "to ask here? If not, can you point to a better forum? >", "I was planning to publish. They shared it internally, and the company requests", "here? If not, can you point to a better forum? > > I", "the following question, but am not sure if it is appropriate for this", "are the competition.” I've put some decent hours in it. Do they have", "to a better forum? > > I consider myself part of the community", "okay to ask here? If not, can you point to a better forum?", "> I had a former colleague, one who works at a former employer,", "decent hours in it. Do they have the right to do that, to", "of scholars. I have a few publications, but have worked (hard) in industry", "I have a few publications, but have worked (hard) in industry for more", "publish, if the content isn't theirs and/or isn't (remotely) confidential? > > >", "tell if it is okay to ask here? If not, can you point", "to publish. They shared it internally, and the company requests that I not", "site. Can you help me tell if it is okay to ask here?", "you point to a better forum? > > I consider myself part of", "publications, but have worked (hard) in industry for more than a decade. >", "the company requests that I not publish. They say: “The only people who", "> > > I had a former colleague, one who works at a", "I can't publish, if the content isn't theirs and/or isn't (remotely) confidential? >", "than a decade. > > > I had a former colleague, one who", "I've put some decent hours in it. Do they have the right to", "a former employer, review a paper that I was planning to publish. They", "it is okay to ask here? If not, can you point to a", "colleague, one who works at a former employer, review a paper that I", "I not publish. They say: “The only people who would care are the", "to do that, to tell me that I can't publish, if the content", "> > I had a former colleague, one who works at a former", "They shared it internally, and the company requests that I not publish. They", "If not, can you point to a better forum? > > I consider", "myself part of the community of scholars. I have a few publications, but", "that, to tell me that I can't publish, if the content isn't theirs", "decade. > > > I had a former colleague, one who works at", "do that, to tell me that I can't publish, if the content isn't", "if it is appropriate for this site. Can you help me tell if", "people who would care are the competition.” I've put some decent hours in", "help me tell if it is okay to ask here? If not, can", "for more than a decade. > > > I had a former colleague,", "requests that I not publish. They say: “The only people who would care", "have worked (hard) in industry for more than a decade. > > >", "a former colleague, one who works at a former employer, review a paper", "a better forum? > > I consider myself part of the community of", "more than a decade. > > > I had a former colleague, one", "not publish. They say: “The only people who would care are the competition.”", "(hard) in industry for more than a decade. > > > I had", "have a few publications, but have worked (hard) in industry for more than", "of the community of scholars. I have a few publications, but have worked", "> > I consider myself part of the community of scholars. I have", "former colleague, one who works at a former employer, review a paper that" ]
[ "like being a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: * What are", "duties? * What are the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement Idea blatantly stolen", "specificities of this site? Acknowledgement Idea blatantly stolen from [Graphics Design Stack Exchange](https://graphicdesign.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3638/70044).", "what it is like being a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular:", "are the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement Idea blatantly stolen from [Graphics Design", "elections, could you please describe what it is like being a moderator on", "or challenging duties? * What are the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement Idea", "For the [upcoming](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) and future elections, could you please describe what it is", "describe what it is like being a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In", "it is like being a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: ", "could you please describe what it is like being a moderator on Academia", "Stack Exchange? In particular: What are your most time-consuming or challenging duties?", "Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: * What are your most time-consuming or challenging", "* What are your most time-consuming or challenging duties? * What are the", "a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: * What are your most", "and future elections, could you please describe what it is like being a", "is like being a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: * What", "are your most time-consuming or challenging duties? * What are the specificities of", "particular: * What are your most time-consuming or challenging duties? * What are", "being a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: * What are your", "What are your most time-consuming or challenging duties? * What are the specificities", "time-consuming or challenging duties? * What are the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement", "Exchange? In particular: * What are your most time-consuming or challenging duties? ", "on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: What are your most time-consuming or", "* What are the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement Idea blatantly stolen from", "In particular: * What are your most time-consuming or challenging duties? * What", "the [upcoming](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) and future elections, could you please describe what it is like", "challenging duties? * What are the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement Idea blatantly", "your most time-consuming or challenging duties? * What are the specificities of this", "What are the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement Idea blatantly stolen from [Graphics", "please describe what it is like being a moderator on Academia Stack Exchange?", "future elections, could you please describe what it is like being a moderator", "most time-consuming or challenging duties? * What are the specificities of this site?", "you please describe what it is like being a moderator on Academia Stack", "the specificities of this site? Acknowledgement Idea blatantly stolen from [Graphics Design Stack", "moderator on Academia Stack Exchange? In particular: * What are your most time-consuming", "[upcoming](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) and future elections, could you please describe what it is like being" ]
[ "give or take time to arrive for closure), this question will be open", "the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will", "pm EDT on the same day, give or take time to arrive for", "some editorial control in the selection of the questions and may opt not", "If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to", "a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps", "on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold", "questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find", "top voted questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to use", "arrive for closure), this question will be open to collect potential questions from", "that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be", "into at currently. * At the start of the nomination phase, the Community", "will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is", "any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a", "the community provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned", "is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458). > > > Academia", "syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for the", "not to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or", "session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what", "you are running into at currently. * At the start of the nomination", "an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates", "or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have", "is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community", "[next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we will be holding a", "voted questions submitted by the community provided in this thread, to use in", "questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458). > > >", "a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it", "(so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the", "running into at currently. * At the start of the nomination phase, the", "> > Academia is scheduled for an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In", "the selection of the questions and may opt not to select a question", "post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your question contains a link, please", "or the election. * Once questions have been selected, a new question will", "potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this question", "that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are", "ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done", "we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an", "> > *The purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the", "community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a single post,", "the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like", "the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for", "you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per", "Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first", "at currently. * At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team", "questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction.", "of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the", "in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control", "live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).** > > > Academia is scheduled", "answer. We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of", "or take time to arrive for closure), this question will be open to", "this question will be open to collect potential questions from the users of", "questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question", "8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community* provided in this", "be open to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post", "to this question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates.", "the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a single", "moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination", "submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to use in addition to", "This will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions", "with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is", "typically containing 10 questions in total. * This is not the only option", "for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it", "as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. ", "use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial", "question per answer. * We, the Community Team, will be providing a small", "completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until", "provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this", "Once questions have been selected, a new question will be opened to host", "the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions", "election. * Once questions have been selected, a new question will be opened", "the nomination phase, (so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm", "included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This", "questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to use in addition", "will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to", "This will be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction. ", " Until the nomination phase, (so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or", "Academia is scheduled for an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with", "is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. * Once questions have", "The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).** > >", "of the questions and may opt not to select a question that is", "of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would", "in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions.", "hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or", "thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live,", "irrelevant to moderation or the election. * Once questions have been selected, a", "question will be open to collect potential questions from the users of the", "to be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough", "the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. * This is not the", "find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).** > > > Academia is scheduled for an election [next", "the questions and may opt not to select a question that is tangential", "scheduled for an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we", "candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. * This is not the only", "community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation", "only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community,", "Community Team will select *up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted", "time to arrive for closure), this question will be open to collect potential", "example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions,", "to arrive for closure), this question will be open to collect potential questions", "Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free", "ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. We, the", "purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire", "week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A", "be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two will be", "guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection of the questions", "per answer. We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection", "selection of the questions and may opt not to select a question that", "`[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire.", "10 questions in total. * This is not the only option that users", "for closure), this question will be open to collect potential questions from the", "for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. * This is not", "clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions", "option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you", "gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for", "questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific", "for an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we will", "like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. ", "guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply", "total. This is not the only option that users have for gathering", "in the selection of the questions and may opt not to select a", "with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community", "collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this", "that are specific to your community and issues that you are running into", "the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how", "collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may", "will select *up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the", "opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on", "live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications", "if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a", "candidates. Please only post one question per answer. We, the Community Team,", "Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase,", "20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or take", "been selected, a new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire", "questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection of the questions and", "is scheduled for an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that,", "in total. * This is not the only option that users have for", "community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session", "prior instruction. * If your question contains a link, please use the syntax", "of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: * Until the", "the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a", "to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask", "one question per answer. * We, the Community Team, will be providing a", "your question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that", "the nomination phase, the Community Team will select *up to 8 of the", "to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to", "not the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As", "editorial control in the selection of the questions and may opt not to", "make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. This is a", "it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect", "reserve some editorial control in the selection of the questions and may opt", "take time to arrive for closure), this question will be open to collect", "> > > Academia is scheduled for an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3).", "pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely", "will be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If", "moderation or the election. * Once questions have been selected, a new question", "the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select *up to", "opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that", "that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. Once questions", "what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback", "would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer.", "this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We", "questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing", "a single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your question contains a", "the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. ", "connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This", "to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in", "16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give", "two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the", "to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that you", "are specific to your community and issues that you are running into at", "of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of", " This is not the only option that users have for gathering information", "holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members", "easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity", "to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's", "providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed", "questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones", "in a single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your question contains", "is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so,", "perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues", "unlike the prior instruction. * If your question contains a link, please use", "this question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please", "UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or take time", "questions that are specific to your community and issues that you are running", "now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).** > > > Academia is", "the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. * We, the Community", "be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions.", "If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as", "community** provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2", "This is not the only option that users have for gathering information on", "on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work:", "answers to this question containing any questions you would like to ask the", "questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a comment", "latter ones are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be", "or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a comment here.", "* Once questions have been selected, a new question will be opened to", "community and issues that you are running into at currently. * At the", "is not the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates.", "instruction. * If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of", "any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one", "for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to,", "and issues that you are running into at currently. At the start", "doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike", "Please only post one question per answer. * We, the Community Team, will", "still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates", "addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in", "your community and issues that you are running into at currently. * At", "candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose", "are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your", "be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the", "at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or", "will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the community", "the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection", "We reserve some editorial control in the selection of the questions and may", "finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are", "* We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic", "from the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any", "the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The", "specific to your community and issues that you are running into at currently.", "to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some", "September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day,", "the top voted questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to", "opt not to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation", "to your community and issues that you are running into at currently. ", "be done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction. If your", "please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for", "September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with", "In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates.", "post one question per answer. * We, the Community Team, will be providing", "questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you", "your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided", "issues that you are running into at currently. * At the start of", "to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is", "voluntary. Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until September", "it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).** > > > Academia is scheduled for an election [next week,", "for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to", "the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that", "to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community provided in", "select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election.", "up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community** provided", "control in the selection of the questions and may opt not to select", "from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or", "questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. * This is", "perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any", "start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select *up to 8", "currently. At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will", "ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A.", "you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).** > > > Academia is scheduled for an", "transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice", "tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. * Once questions have been", "the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel", "selected, a new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for", "Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two", "thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve", "until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same", "to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the", "* This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to", "first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if", "phase, (so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on", "nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of the top", "phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of the top voted", "members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic", "how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until September 16 at", "As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live", "* At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select", "a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. ", "of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished", "are running into at currently. At the start of the nomination phase,", "questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).** >", "done in a single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your question", "aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection of", "> *The purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire.", "that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. This", "the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community to", "a small selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to", "open to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers", "for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the", "the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: ", "of the top voted questions submitted by the community* provided in this thread,", "closure), this question will be open to collect potential questions from the users", "will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity", "will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The first two will", "day, give or take time to arrive for closure), this question will be", "link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier", "is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about", "may opt not to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to", "of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of", "for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further", "to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the", "information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example,", "actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total. * This", "single post, unlike the prior instruction. * If your question contains a link,", "2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection of the", "election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we will be holding", "the same day, give or take time to arrive for closure), this question", "Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).** > > > Academia is scheduled for an election [next week, September", "to moderation or the election. * Once questions have been selected, a new", "generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter", "an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we will be", "users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still", "topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll work: * Until", "questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary.", "use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing", "host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions in total.", "Here's how it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until September 16", "Until the nomination phase, (so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00", "and may opt not to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant", "for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions", "candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a", "have been selected, a new question will be opened to host the actual", "*The purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The", "candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here's how it'll", "have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free", "with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will", "the election. Once questions have been selected, a new question will be", "this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now", "are if the community doesn't supply enough questions. This will be done in", "contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make", "that you are running into at currently. * At the start of the", "to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you", "select up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community", "the prior instruction. * If your question contains a link, please use the", "a new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the", "EDT on the same day, give or take time to arrive for closure),", "The first two will be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are", "questions and may opt not to select a question that is tangential or", "the Community Team will select *up to 8 of the top voted questions", "was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and", "voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that you are", "question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. Once", "you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post", "At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up", "selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be included,", "provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed", "enough questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike the prior", "a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and", "chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from", "of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is", "by the community provided in this thread, to use in addition to the", "users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you", "site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like to", "new question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates,", "you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with", "on the same day, give or take time to arrive for closure), this", "it'll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z", "* If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`,", "or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or take time to", "question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only", "only post one question per answer. * We, the Community Team, will be", "small selection of generic questions. The first two will be guaranteed to be", "nomination phase, (so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT", "free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to", "> Academia is scheduled for an election [next week, September 16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection", "containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post", "to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the", "will be open to collect potential questions from the users of the site.", "a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat", "may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).** > > > Academia is scheduled for an election", "work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until September 16 at 20:00:00Z UTC,", "question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will", "be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for", "Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like to ask", "supply enough questions. This will be done in a single post, unlike the", "questions have been selected, a new question will be opened to host the", "16](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3). In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the", "4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or take time to arrive", "We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions.", "question will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically", "candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in", "the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458).", "and you may find it [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4561/32458). > > > Academia is scheduled for", "to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. * We,", "further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If", "opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10 questions", "containing 10 questions in total. * This is not the only option that", "a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of", "be guaranteed to be included, the latter ones are if the community doesn't", "Team will select *up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by", "the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation.", "will be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing", "be opened to host the actual questionnaire for the candidates, typically containing 10", "same day, give or take time to arrive for closure), this question will", "questions in total. This is not the only option that users have", "This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your", "have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as", "or irrelevant to moderation or the election. * Once questions have been selected,", "in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this process," ]
[ "pointed to a more appropriate forum. Instead of helping out with that, just", "hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I came to stack exchange, I had heard", "exchange, I had heard a lot of negativity about it from Reddit users.", "looking for general direction and not specifics. I have had one user on", "stack exchange, I had heard a lot of negativity about it from Reddit", "posting 6-7 times on that forum and each time have had my questions", "of helping out with that, just get a yellow \"put on hold\" notification", "heard a lot of negativity about it from Reddit users. How the site", "get a yellow \"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I came to", "over the top with toxicity, removes everything for being a duplicate, locking threads,", "stating I was looking for general direction and not specifics. I have had", "something, following me around and flagging everything as off topic. I have also", "formatted poorly or too general, that I would appreciate being pointed to a", "topic. I have also asked several times that if it's formatted poorly or", "me specifically stating I was looking for general direction and not specifics. I", "site was over the top with toxicity, removes everything for being a duplicate,", "users. How the site was over the top with toxicity, removes everything for", "specifically stating I was looking for general direction and not specifics. I have", "from Reddit users. How the site was over the top with toxicity, removes", "I have tried posting 6-7 times on that forum and each time have", "and each time have had my questions flagged as off topic or too", "I had heard a lot of negativity about it from Reddit users. How", "to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange Academia users act with", "threads, etc. I wanted to see for myself, and at least in my", "top with toxicity, removes everything for being a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I", "the site was over the top with toxicity, removes everything for being a", "my experience, it seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange", "questions, I have tried posting 6-7 times on that forum and each time", "have tried posting 6-7 times on that forum and each time have had", "came to stack exchange, I had heard a lot of negativity about it", "out with that, just get a yellow \"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange.", "lot of negativity about it from Reddit users. How the site was over", "be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange Academia users act with such", "I have had one user on that site, solar mike or something, following", "notification from Stackexchange. Before I came to stack exchange, I had heard a", "have had one user on that site, solar mike or something, following me", "and flagging everything as off topic. I have also asked several times that", "off topic or too specific. Despite me specifically stating I was looking for", "true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange Academia users act with such hostility?", "around and flagging everything as off topic. I have also asked several times", "related questions, I have tried posting 6-7 times on that forum and each", "locking threads, etc. I wanted to see for myself, and at least in", "How the site was over the top with toxicity, removes everything for being", "a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted to see for myself, and at", "questions flagged as off topic or too specific. Despite me specifically stating I", "for myself, and at least in my experience, it seems to be true.", "the top with toxicity, removes everything for being a duplicate, locking threads, etc.", "that I would appreciate being pointed to a more appropriate forum. Instead of", "forum and each time have had my questions flagged as off topic or", "everything as off topic. I have also asked several times that if it's", "that forum and each time have had my questions flagged as off topic", "from Stackexchange. Before I came to stack exchange, I had heard a lot", "time have had my questions flagged as off topic or too specific. Despite", "several times that if it's formatted poorly or too general, that I would", "forum. Instead of helping out with that, just get a yellow \"put on", "I would appreciate being pointed to a more appropriate forum. Instead of helping", "mike or something, following me around and flagging everything as off topic. I", "of negativity about it from Reddit users. How the site was over the", "times on that forum and each time have had my questions flagged as", "Instead of helping out with that, just get a yellow \"put on hold\"", "it from Reddit users. How the site was over the top with toxicity,", "I have also asked several times that if it's formatted poorly or too", "myself, and at least in my experience, it seems to be true. Example:", "I was looking for general direction and not specifics. I have had one", "times that if it's formatted poorly or too general, that I would appreciate", "with that, just get a yellow \"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before", "on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I came to stack exchange, I had", "general direction and not specifics. I have had one user on that site,", "about it from Reddit users. How the site was over the top with", "a yellow \"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I came to stack", "would appreciate being pointed to a more appropriate forum. Instead of helping out", "being a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted to see for myself, and", "one user on that site, solar mike or something, following me around and", "and helping users out with academic related questions, I have tried posting 6-7", "tried posting 6-7 times on that forum and each time have had my", "too specific. Despite me specifically stating I was looking for general direction and", "or too general, that I would appreciate being pointed to a more appropriate", "if it's formatted poorly or too general, that I would appreciate being pointed", "everything for being a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted to see for", "not specifics. I have had one user on that site, solar mike or", "Before I came to stack exchange, I had heard a lot of negativity", "a more appropriate forum. Instead of helping out with that, just get a", "that site, solar mike or something, following me around and flagging everything as", "users out with academic related questions, I have tried posting 6-7 times on", "about academia and helping users out with academic related questions, I have tried", "as off topic or too specific. Despite me specifically stating I was looking", "topic or too specific. Despite me specifically stating I was looking for general", "with academic related questions, I have tried posting 6-7 times on that forum", "see for myself, and at least in my experience, it seems to be", "or something, following me around and flagging everything as off topic. I have", "or too specific. Despite me specifically stating I was looking for general direction", "being pointed to a more appropriate forum. Instead of helping out with that,", "\"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I came to stack exchange, I", "was over the top with toxicity, removes everything for being a duplicate, locking", "Reddit users. How the site was over the top with toxicity, removes everything", "poorly or too general, that I would appreciate being pointed to a more", "was looking for general direction and not specifics. I have had one user", "it seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange Academia users", "a lot of negativity about it from Reddit users. How the site was", "solar mike or something, following me around and flagging everything as off topic.", "least in my experience, it seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why", "off topic. I have also asked several times that if it's formatted poorly", "academia and helping users out with academic related questions, I have tried posting", "had heard a lot of negativity about it from Reddit users. How the", "too general, that I would appreciate being pointed to a more appropriate forum.", "appreciate being pointed to a more appropriate forum. Instead of helping out with", "experience, it seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange Academia", "asked several times that if it's formatted poorly or too general, that I", "a site about academia and helping users out with academic related questions, I", "seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do Stackexchange Academia users act", "each time have had my questions flagged as off topic or too specific.", "specific. Despite me specifically stating I was looking for general direction and not", "I came to stack exchange, I had heard a lot of negativity about", "had one user on that site, solar mike or something, following me around", "6-7 times on that forum and each time have had my questions flagged", "my questions flagged as off topic or too specific. Despite me specifically stating", "helping out with that, just get a yellow \"put on hold\" notification from", "flagging everything as off topic. I have also asked several times that if", "and at least in my experience, it seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/>", "appropriate forum. Instead of helping out with that, just get a yellow \"put", "to see for myself, and at least in my experience, it seems to", "site, solar mike or something, following me around and flagging everything as off", "it's formatted poorly or too general, that I would appreciate being pointed to", "wanted to see for myself, and at least in my experience, it seems", "general, that I would appreciate being pointed to a more appropriate forum. Instead", "removes everything for being a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted to see", "in my experience, it seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR: Why do", "have also asked several times that if it's formatted poorly or too general,", "out with academic related questions, I have tried posting 6-7 times on that", "academic related questions, I have tried posting 6-7 times on that forum and", "just get a yellow \"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I came", "to a more appropriate forum. Instead of helping out with that, just get", "had my questions flagged as off topic or too specific. Despite me specifically", "yellow \"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I came to stack exchange,", "following me around and flagging everything as off topic. I have also asked", "at least in my experience, it seems to be true. Example: <https://www.reddit.com/r/cscareerquestions/comments/8ewwjc/is_it_just_me_or_is_stack_overflow_an_incredibly/> TL;DR:", "direction and not specifics. I have had one user on that site, solar", "site about academia and helping users out with academic related questions, I have", "me around and flagging everything as off topic. I have also asked several", "with toxicity, removes everything for being a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted", "as off topic. I have also asked several times that if it's formatted", "negativity about it from Reddit users. How the site was over the top", "I wanted to see for myself, and at least in my experience, it", "to stack exchange, I had heard a lot of negativity about it from", "and not specifics. I have had one user on that site, solar mike", "toxicity, removes everything for being a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted to", "for being a duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted to see for myself,", "for general direction and not specifics. I have had one user on that", "that if it's formatted poorly or too general, that I would appreciate being", "Despite me specifically stating I was looking for general direction and not specifics.", "have had my questions flagged as off topic or too specific. Despite me", "etc. I wanted to see for myself, and at least in my experience,", "duplicate, locking threads, etc. I wanted to see for myself, and at least", "also asked several times that if it's formatted poorly or too general, that", "on that forum and each time have had my questions flagged as off", "For a site about academia and helping users out with academic related questions,", "that, just get a yellow \"put on hold\" notification from Stackexchange. Before I", "flagged as off topic or too specific. Despite me specifically stating I was", "helping users out with academic related questions, I have tried posting 6-7 times", "more appropriate forum. Instead of helping out with that, just get a yellow", "user on that site, solar mike or something, following me around and flagging", "on that site, solar mike or something, following me around and flagging everything", "specifics. I have had one user on that site, solar mike or something,", "Stackexchange. Before I came to stack exchange, I had heard a lot of" ]
[ "the activity. If you don't wish to, that's your prerogative, but any 20k+", "to, that's your prerogative, but any 20k+ user can see flags on questions.", "Please try to disassociate the diamond here from the activity. If you don't", "disassociate the diamond here from the activity. If you don't wish to, that's", "received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was sufficient or", "whether the answer was sufficient or whether it was baseless accusations. I then", "number of flags on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China", "my edits went too far. Were my edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to", "question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was a dictatorship with little", "them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was a dictatorship with little respect for the", "that my edits went too far. Were my edits inappropriate? Note: Please try", "few moderately contentious answers, as judged by the number of flags on the", "on China's IP policy and removing the unsourced comments. A few people commented", "comments. A few people commented that my edits went too far. Were my", "on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was a dictatorship", "to disassociate the diamond here from the activity. If you don't wish to,", "the answer was sufficient or whether it was baseless accusations. I then [edited", "patent system. That answer received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the", "China's IP policy and removing the unsourced comments. A few people commented that", "flags on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was a", "dictatorship with little respect for the American patent system. That answer received [a", "That answer received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was", "it was baseless accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of", "commented that my edits went too far. Were my edits inappropriate? Note: Please", "edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate the diamond here from the activity.", "inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate the diamond here from the activity. If", "that China was a dictatorship with little respect for the American patent system.", "your prerogative, but any 20k+ user can see flags on questions. I edited", "contentious answers, as judged by the number of flags on the question. [One", "a dictatorship with little respect for the American patent system. That answer received", "wish to, that's your prerogative, but any 20k+ user can see flags on", "edits went too far. Were my edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate", "number of links to sources on China's IP policy and removing the unsourced", "sufficient or whether it was baseless accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding", "20k+ user can see flags on questions. I edited in the mindset of", "yielded a few moderately contentious answers, as judged by the number of flags", "If you don't wish to, that's your prerogative, but any 20k+ user can", "see flags on questions. I edited in the mindset of a member of", "I edited in the mindset of a member of this site, not as", "by the number of flags on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated", "edited in the mindset of a member of this site, not as a", "don't wish to, that's your prerogative, but any 20k+ user can see flags", "[One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was a dictatorship with little respect", "accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links to sources", "user can see flags on questions. I edited in the mindset of a", "whether it was baseless accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number", "sources on China's IP policy and removing the unsourced comments. A few people", "or whether it was baseless accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a", "was sufficient or whether it was baseless accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions),", "judged by the number of flags on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply", "you don't wish to, that's your prerogative, but any 20k+ user can see", "discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was sufficient or whether it was baseless accusations.", "patent infringement yielded a few moderately contentious answers, as judged by the number", "answers, as judged by the number of flags on the question. [One of", "American patent system. That answer received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether", "the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links to sources on China's IP policy", "people commented that my edits went too far. Were my edits inappropriate? Note:", "little respect for the American patent system. That answer received [a lot of", "on questions. I edited in the mindset of a member of this site,", "answer received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was sufficient", "moderately contentious answers, as judged by the number of flags on the question.", "went too far. Were my edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate the", "the diamond here from the activity. If you don't wish to, that's your", "try to disassociate the diamond here from the activity. If you don't wish", "that's your prerogative, but any 20k+ user can see flags on questions. I", "but any 20k+ user can see flags on questions. I edited in the", "was baseless accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links", "was a dictatorship with little respect for the American patent system. That answer", "links to sources on China's IP policy and removing the unsourced comments. A", "any 20k+ user can see flags on questions. I edited in the mindset", "diamond here from the activity. If you don't wish to, that's your prerogative,", "of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was sufficient or whether it was", "the number of flags on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that", "IP policy and removing the unsourced comments. A few people commented that my", "then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links to sources on China's", "I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links to sources on", "simply stated that China was a dictatorship with little respect for the American", "China was a dictatorship with little respect for the American patent system. That", "of flags on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was", "comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was sufficient or whether it was baseless", "Note: Please try to disassociate the diamond here from the activity. If you", "with little respect for the American patent system. That answer received [a lot", "lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was sufficient or whether it", "A few people commented that my edits went too far. Were my edits", "adding a number of links to sources on China's IP policy and removing", "few people commented that my edits went too far. Were my edits inappropriate?", "Were my edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate the diamond here from", "baseless accusations. I then [edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links to", "infringement yielded a few moderately contentious answers, as judged by the number of", "[a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer was sufficient or whether", "[edited the answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links to sources on China's IP", "as judged by the number of flags on the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1)", "from the activity. If you don't wish to, that's your prerogative, but any", "and removing the unsourced comments. A few people commented that my edits went", "about whether the answer was sufficient or whether it was baseless accusations. I", "here from the activity. If you don't wish to, that's your prerogative, but", "questions. I edited in the mindset of a member of this site, not", "the unsourced comments. A few people commented that my edits went too far.", "my edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate the diamond here from the", "to sources on China's IP policy and removing the unsourced comments. A few", "activity. If you don't wish to, that's your prerogative, but any 20k+ user", "flags on questions. I edited in the mindset of a member of this", "too far. Were my edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate the diamond", "answer was sufficient or whether it was baseless accusations. I then [edited the", "a number of links to sources on China's IP policy and removing the", "respect for the American patent system. That answer received [a lot of comment", "can see flags on questions. I edited in the mindset of a member", "policy and removing the unsourced comments. A few people commented that my edits", "about patent infringement yielded a few moderately contentious answers, as judged by the", "the question. [One of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was a dictatorship with", "in the mindset of a member of this site, not as a moderator.", "removing the unsourced comments. A few people commented that my edits went too", "far. Were my edits inappropriate? Note: Please try to disassociate the diamond here", "a few moderately contentious answers, as judged by the number of flags on", "prerogative, but any 20k+ user can see flags on questions. I edited in", "of links to sources on China's IP policy and removing the unsourced comments.", "system. That answer received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about whether the answer", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/135933/revisions), adding a number of links to sources on China's IP policy and", "stated that China was a dictatorship with little respect for the American patent", "the American patent system. That answer received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in) about", "for the American patent system. That answer received [a lot of comment discussion](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/98587/discussion-on-answer-by-william-jockusch-my-research-paper-filed-as-a-patent-in)", "[This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135907/73) about patent infringement yielded a few moderately contentious answers, as judged", "of them](https://academia.stackexchange.com/revisions/135933/1) simply stated that China was a dictatorship with little respect for", "unsourced comments. A few people commented that my edits went too far. Were", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135907/73) about patent infringement yielded a few moderately contentious answers, as judged by" ]
[ "to Academia SE? > 3. Do you have any previous experience as a", "answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please", "Should we be lenient and keep open questions that can potentially generate good", "example? > 5. In what way do you feel that being a moderator", "compiled into this one, which shall now serve as the space for the", "improve the welcome felt by new posters to Academia SE? > 3. Do", "this one, which shall now serve as the space for the candidates to", "compiled - as noted, we only selected the top 8 questions as submitted", "the list of links in the order of submission. To save scrolling here", "do you think presence on the HNQ list should affect moderation decisions, given", "other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What question or", "and then post your answer to each question given in that same answer.", "insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the first set of", "question given in that same answer. For your convenience, I will include all", "serve as the space for the candidates to provide their answers. Not every", "of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from", "Just [copy the whole thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider", "and also including a link to your answer on your nomination post. Once", "this will serve as a transcript for voters to view the thoughts of", "are often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances will you delete", "on the HNQ list should affect moderation decisions, given its frequency? > 9.", "the submissions from each candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458)", "that can potentially generate good answers even if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow", "for voters to view the thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately", "of submission. To save scrolling here are links to the submissions from each", "reaching 10k or 20k rep? > 6. How would you deal with a", "after this blurb here, before that set of three dashes. Please leave the", "was compiled - as noted, we only selected the top 8 questions as", "moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or", "- as noted, we only selected the top 8 questions as submitted by", "that same answer. For your convenience, I will include all of the questions", "view the thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the", "the thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the Election", "the top 8 questions as submitted by the community, plus 2 pre-set questions", "dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top of your post so that", "1. What is your time zone? What is the time period you are", "another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been? > 8.", "Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been", "to improve the onboarding and also improve the welcome felt by new posters", "needed. Under what circumstances will you delete comments? > 10. What is your", "have been compiled into this one, which shall now serve as the space", "> 8. What do you think the moderators' role should be with respect", "links in the order of submission. To save scrolling here are links to", "as a moderator, either on Stack Exchange or on other kind of communities", "pre-set questions from us. As a candidate, your job is simple - post", "7. How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question", "set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top of your", "What is your stance about the current scope of Academia Stack Exchange and", "if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow or broaden the scope? > > >", "to view the thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in", "longer needed. Under what circumstances will you delete comments? > 10. What is", "simple - post an answer to this question, citing each of the questions", "be lenient and keep open questions that can potentially generate good answers even", "think the moderators' role should be with respect to Hot Network Questions list", "[M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What is your time zone? What is the", "Academia Stack Exchange and how this is enforced? Should we close any question", "specify the answer in UTC format. > 2. New users and posters tend", "Under what circumstances will you delete comments? > 10. What is your stance", "affect moderation decisions, given its frequency? > 9. Comments can be tricky to", "felt by new posters to Academia SE? > 3. Do you have any", "thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at", "answer to this question, citing each of the questions and then post your", "top of your post so that readers will know who you are before", "save scrolling here are links to the submissions from each candidate (in order", "Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your", "the onboarding and also improve the welcome felt by new posters to Academia", "and will be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck to all", "large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How would you handle a", "moderation decisions, given its frequency? > 9. Comments can be tricky to deal", "the answer in UTC format. > 2. New users and posters tend to", "closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been? > 8. What do", "> 1. What is your time zone? What is the time period you", "users and posters tend to struggle more than experienced users. What would you", "the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top", "the moderators' role should be with respect to Hot Network Questions list questions,", "What do you think the moderators' role should be with respect to Hot", "the answers have been compiled, this will serve as a transcript for voters", "or 20k rep? > 6. How would you deal with a user who", "stance about the current scope of Academia Stack Exchange and how this is", "thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled", "make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?", "noted, we only selected the top 8 questions as submitted by the community,", "any question that does not strictly comply with the current scope? Should we", "your name at the top of your post so that readers will know", "tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How", "putting your name at the top of your post so that readers will", "are links to the submissions from each candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo", "questions in quote format with a break in between each, suitable for you", "in UTC format. > 2. New users and posters tend to struggle more", "to this question, citing each of the questions and then post your answer", "of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What question or answer of", "between each, suitable for you to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole", "earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this one, which shall now serve as", "same answer. For your convenience, I will include all of the questions in", "as the space for the candidates to provide their answers. Not every question", "you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers,", "question, citing each of the questions and then post your answer to each", "or on other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What", "convenience, I will include all of the questions in quote format with a", "(in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What", "format. > 2. New users and posters tend to struggle more than experienced", "you to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the first", "for the candidates to provide their answers. Not every question was compiled -", "What question or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on", "How do you think presence on the HNQ list should affect moderation decisions,", "valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?", "and how this is enforced? Should we close any question that does not", "newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What question or answer of yours on meta", "job is simple - post an answer to this question, citing each of", "new posters to Academia SE? > 3. Do you have any previous experience", "previous experience as a moderator, either on Stack Exchange or on other kind", "a question that you feel shouldn't have been? > 8. What do you", "to provide their answers. Not every question was compiled - as noted, we", "do you think the moderators' role should be with respect to Hot Network", "best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this is the", "candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please provide a link to", "9. Comments can be tricky to deal with, and are often flagged as", "suitable for you to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after", "think presence on the HNQ list should affect moderation decisions, given its frequency?", "feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to", "that readers will know who you are before they finish reading everything you", "a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k", "to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How would", "> > 1. What is your time zone? What is the time period", "this question, citing each of the questions and then post your answer to", "questions from us. As a candidate, your job is simple - post an", "your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this is the best example?", "post so that readers will know who you are before they finish reading", "5. In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make", "effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? > 6. How", "for moderating our site everyday? Please specify the answer in UTC format. >", "questions and then post your answer to each question given in that same", "to the submissions from each candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875)", "your job is simple - post an answer to this question, citing each", "can potentially generate good answers even if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow or", "would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you", "page. Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed", "or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why", "scrolling here are links to the submissions from each candidate (in order of", "your answer to each question given in that same answer. For your convenience,", "posters tend to struggle more than experienced users. What would you do as", "on Stack Exchange or on other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)?", "everyday? Please specify the answer in UTC format. > 2. New users and", "link to it after this blurb here, before that set of three dashes.", "the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this", "selected the top 8 questions as submitted by the community, plus 2 pre-set", "answer. For your convenience, I will include all of the questions in quote", "should be with respect to Hot Network Questions list questions, given their potential", "How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that", "you have written, and also including a link to your answer on your", "now serve as the space for the candidates to provide their answers. Not", "collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this one, which shall", "good answers even if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow or broaden the scope?", "2. New users and posters tend to struggle more than experienced users. What", "of links in the order of submission. To save scrolling here are links", "their answers. Not every question was compiled - as noted, we only selected", "of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good", "Stack Exchange or on other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? >", "of the questions in quote format with a break in between each, suitable", "What is your time zone? What is the time period you are available", "a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have", "do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as", "is your time zone? What is the time period you are available for", "answers. Not every question was compiled - as noted, we only selected the", "format with a break in between each, suitable for you to insert your", "4. What question or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy", "does not strictly comply with the current scope? Should we be lenient and", "you feel shouldn't have been? > 8. What do you think the moderators'", "is simple - post an answer to this question, citing each of the", "experienced users. What would you do as a moderator to improve the onboarding", "you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? >", "New users and posters tend to struggle more than experienced users. What would", "best example? > 5. In what way do you feel that being a", "> 2. New users and posters tend to struggle more than experienced users.", "the questions and then post your answer to each question given in that", "HNQ list should affect moderation decisions, given its frequency? > 9. Comments can", "Exchange and how this is enforced? Should we close any question that does", "user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate", "do as a moderator to improve the onboarding and also improve the welcome", "scope? Should we be lenient and keep open questions that can potentially generate", "given in that same answer. For your convenience, I will include all of", "on other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What question", "scope of Academia Stack Exchange and how this is enforced? Should we close", "us. As a candidate, your job is simple - post an answer to", "dashes. Please leave the list of links in the order of submission. To", "role should be with respect to Hot Network Questions list questions, given their", "blurb here, before that set of three dashes. Please leave the list of", "voters to view the thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked", "more than experienced users. What would you do as a moderator to improve", "6. How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream", "obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances will you delete comments? > 10. What", "available for moderating our site everyday? Please specify the answer in UTC format.", "top 8 questions as submitted by the community, plus 2 pre-set questions from", "> 10. What is your stance about the current scope of Academia Stack", "of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please provide a", "your stance about the current scope of Academia Stack Exchange and how this", "flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances will you delete comments? >", "of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you", "post your answer to each question given in that same answer. For your", "Please leave the list of links in the order of submission. To save", "will you delete comments? > 10. What is your stance about the current", "8. What do you think the moderators' role should be with respect to", "the HNQ list should affect moderation decisions, given its frequency? > 9. Comments", "we only selected the top 8 questions as submitted by the community, plus", "moderators' role should be with respect to Hot Network Questions list questions, given", "a moderator, either on Stack Exchange or on other kind of communities (e.g.", "either on Stack Exchange or on other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums", "deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but", "the community, plus 2 pre-set questions from us. As a candidate, your job", "we be lenient and keep open questions that can potentially generate good answers", "connection with the moderator elections, we are holding a Q&A thread for the", "completed your answer, please provide a link to it after this blurb here,", "--- > > 1. What is your time zone? What is the time", "at the top of your post so that readers will know who you", "reading everything you have written, and also including a link to your answer", "the time period you are available for moderating our site everyday? Please specify", "kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What question or answer", "mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been? > 8. What", "you have any previous experience as a moderator, either on Stack Exchange or", "any previous experience as a moderator, either on Stack Exchange or on other", "and keep open questions that can potentially generate good answers even if borderline", "decisions, given its frequency? > 9. Comments can be tricky to deal with,", "provide their answers. Not every question was compiled - as noted, we only", "elections, we are holding a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from", "you do as a moderator to improve the onboarding and also improve the", "an answer to this question, citing each of the questions and then post", "be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck to all of the", "here, before that set of three dashes. Please leave the list of links", "users. What would you do as a moderator to improve the onboarding and", "What would you do as a moderator to improve the onboarding and also", "generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How would you", "you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel", "three dashes. Please leave the list of links in the order of submission.", "be with respect to Hot Network Questions list questions, given their potential for", "the whole thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your", "that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply", "strictly comply with the current scope? Should we be lenient and keep open", "after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the", "and when you've completed your answer, please provide a link to it after", "of three dashes. Please leave the list of links in the order of", "with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends", "with a break in between each, suitable for you to insert your answers.", "your answer, please provide a link to it after this blurb here, before", "delete comments? > 10. What is your stance about the current scope of", "leave the list of links in the order of submission. To save scrolling", "your convenience, I will include all of the questions in quote format with", "you think presence on the HNQ list should affect moderation decisions, given its", "comments? > 10. What is your stance about the current scope of Academia", "citing each of the questions and then post your answer to each question", "each of the questions and then post your answer to each question given", "will be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck to all of", "that you feel shouldn't have been? > 8. What do you think the", "whole thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name", "break in between each, suitable for you to insert your answers. Just [copy", "have been compiled, this will serve as a transcript for voters to view", "question or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation?", "as noted, we only selected the top 8 questions as submitted by the", "question that does not strictly comply with the current scope? Should we be", "> 5. In what way do you feel that being a moderator will", "including a link to your answer on your nomination post. Once all the", "20k rep? > 6. How would you deal with a user who produced", "experience as a moderator, either on Stack Exchange or on other kind of", "questions that can potentially generate good answers even if borderline off-topic? Should we", "a break in between each, suitable for you to insert your answers. Just", "feel shouldn't have been? > 8. What do you think the moderators' role", "every question was compiled - as noted, we only selected the top 8", "readers will know who you are before they finish reading everything you have", "candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1.", "about the current scope of Academia Stack Exchange and how this is enforced?", "to deal with, and are often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what", "the moderator elections, we are holding a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions", "a link to it after this blurb here, before that set of three", "to all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please", "as a moderator to improve the onboarding and also improve the welcome felt", "3. Do you have any previous experience as a moderator, either on Stack", "as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? > 6. How would", "way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective", "also improve the welcome felt by new posters to Academia SE? > 3.", "enforced? Should we close any question that does not strictly comply with the", "list should affect moderation decisions, given its frequency? > 9. Comments can be", "comments? > 7. How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc", "to it after this blurb here, before that set of three dashes. Please", "its frequency? > 9. Comments can be tricky to deal with, and are", "for controversy and \"passerby\" users from the network? How do you think presence", "be tricky to deal with, and are often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed.", "of your post so that readers will know who you are before they", "answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do", "been? > 8. What do you think the moderators' role should be with", "is your stance about the current scope of Academia Stack Exchange and how", "Network Questions list questions, given their potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users from", "your post so that readers will know who you are before they finish", "to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? > 6. How would you deal", "keep open questions that can potentially generate good answers even if borderline off-topic?", "time zone? What is the time period you are available for moderating our", "before they finish reading everything you have written, and also including a link", "to Hot Network Questions list questions, given their potential for controversy and \"passerby\"", "is the time period you are available for moderating our site everyday? Please", "Should we close any question that does not strictly comply with the current", "and posters tend to struggle more than experienced users. What would you do", "yours on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel", "stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags", "from the network? How do you think presence on the HNQ list should", "Stack Exchange and how this is enforced? Should we close any question that", "generate good answers even if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow or broaden the", "one, which shall now serve as the space for the candidates to provide", "appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck to all of the candidates!", "moderator, either on Stack Exchange or on other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups,", "all of the questions in quote format with a break in between each,", "everything you have written, and also including a link to your answer on", "In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you", "a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have", "in the order of submission. To save scrolling here are links to the", "presence on the HNQ list should affect moderation decisions, given its frequency? >", "opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? > 6. How would you", "open questions that can potentially generate good answers even if borderline off-topic? Should", "compiled, this will serve as a transcript for voters to view the thoughts", "produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large", "then post your answer to each question given in that same answer. For", "will serve as a transcript for voters to view the thoughts of their", "answer, please provide a link to it after this blurb here, before that", "> 6. How would you deal with a user who produced a steady", "written, and also including a link to your answer on your nomination post.", "onboarding and also improve the welcome felt by new posters to Academia SE?", "I will include all of the questions in quote format with a break", "the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please provide a link", "as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances will you delete comments? > 10.", "Comments can be tricky to deal with, and are often flagged as obsolete/no", "meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this is", "Exchange or on other kind of communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4.", "that does not strictly comply with the current scope? Should we be lenient", "of Academia Stack Exchange and how this is enforced? Should we close any", "[from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this one, which shall now", "each candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > >", "where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been? >", "users from the network? How do you think presence on the HNQ list", "please provide a link to it after this blurb here, before that set", "Questions list questions, given their potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users from the", "serve as a transcript for voters to view the thoughts of their candidates,", "submission. To save scrolling here are links to the submissions from each candidate", "controversy and \"passerby\" users from the network? How do you think presence on", "philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this is the best example? >", "moderation? Why do you feel this is the best example? > 5. In", "will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k", "current scope of Academia Stack Exchange and how this is enforced? Should we", "know who you are before they finish reading everything you have written, and", "post. Once all the answers have been compiled, this will serve as a", "[cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What is your time zone? What is", "deal with, and are often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances", "8 questions as submitted by the community, plus 2 pre-set questions from us.", "given their potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users from the network? How do", "we close any question that does not strictly comply with the current scope?", "space for the candidates to provide their answers. Not every question was compiled", "respect to Hot Network Questions list questions, given their potential for controversy and", "Once all the answers have been compiled, this will serve as a transcript", "question that you feel shouldn't have been? > 8. What do you think", "the network? How do you think presence on the HNQ list should affect", "[copy the whole thing after the first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting", "As a candidate, your job is simple - post an answer to this", "your nomination post. Once all the answers have been compiled, this will serve", "with respect to Hot Network Questions list questions, given their potential for controversy", "as submitted by the community, plus 2 pre-set questions from us. As a", "here are links to the submissions from each candidate (in order of submission):", "you delete comments? > 10. What is your stance about the current scope", "In connection with the moderator elections, we are holding a Q&A thread for", "UTC format. > 2. New users and posters tend to struggle more than", "lenient and keep open questions that can potentially generate good answers even if", "have written, and also including a link to your answer on your nomination", "will know who you are before they finish reading everything you have written,", "the welcome felt by new posters to Academia SE? > 3. Do you", "list questions, given their potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users from the network?", "\"passerby\" users from the network? How do you think presence on the HNQ", "is enforced? Should we close any question that does not strictly comply with", "an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this one, which shall now serve", "a link to your answer on your nomination post. Once all the answers", "moderator elections, we are holding a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected", "of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What is your", "their potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users from the network? How do you", "from comments? > 7. How would you handle a situation where another mod", "answer to each question given in that same answer. For your convenience, I", "close any question that does not strictly comply with the current scope? Should", "[Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What is your time zone?", "luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer,", "network? How do you think presence on the HNQ list should affect moderation", "tend to struggle more than experienced users. What would you do as a", "thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this one, which shall now serve as the", "Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What is your time zone? What", "10. What is your stance about the current scope of Academia Stack Exchange", "submissions from each candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) ---", "Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this one, which", "a candidate, your job is simple - post an answer to this question,", "answer on your nomination post. Once all the answers have been compiled, this", "been compiled into this one, which shall now serve as the space for", "Hot Network Questions list questions, given their potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users", "feel this is the best example? > 5. In what way do you", "each, suitable for you to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing", "when you've completed your answer, please provide a link to it after this", "set of three dashes. Please leave the list of links in the order", "only selected the top 8 questions as submitted by the community, plus 2", "submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What is your time", "all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please provide", "a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number", "being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching", "zone? What is the time period you are available for moderating our site", "we are holding a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an", "to each question given in that same answer. For your convenience, I will", "current scope? Should we be lenient and keep open questions that can potentially", "three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top of your post so", "arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How would you handle a situation where another", "the candidates to provide their answers. Not every question was compiled - as", "> 3. Do you have any previous experience as a moderator, either on", "question was compiled - as noted, we only selected the top 8 questions", "potentially generate good answers even if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow or broaden", "by the community, plus 2 pre-set questions from us. As a candidate, your", "do you feel this is the best example? > 5. In what way", "Academia SE? > 3. Do you have any previous experience as a moderator,", "linked in the Election page. Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh,", "can be tricky to deal with, and are often flagged as obsolete/no longer", "are available for moderating our site everyday? Please specify the answer in UTC", "given its frequency? > 9. Comments can be tricky to deal with, and", "been compiled, this will serve as a transcript for voters to view the", "each question given in that same answer. For your convenience, I will include", "tricky to deal with, and are often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under", "(e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What question or answer of yours on", "moderating our site everyday? Please specify the answer in UTC format. > 2.", "Not every question was compiled - as noted, we only selected the top", "will include all of the questions in quote format with a break in", "- post an answer to this question, citing each of the questions and", "thoughts of their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the Election page.", "and are often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances will you", "> 9. Comments can be tricky to deal with, and are often flagged", "and also improve the welcome felt by new posters to Academia SE? >", "nomination post. Once all the answers have been compiled, this will serve as", "struggle more than experienced users. What would you do as a moderator to", "site everyday? Please specify the answer in UTC format. > 2. New users", "10k or 20k rep? > 6. How would you deal with a user", "order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- > > 1. What is", "SE? > 3. Do you have any previous experience as a moderator, either", "you think the moderators' role should be with respect to Hot Network Questions", "transcript for voters to view the thoughts of their candidates, and will be", "than experienced users. What would you do as a moderator to improve the", "candidates to provide their answers. Not every question was compiled - as noted,", "who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a", "of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top of your post", "to struggle more than experienced users. What would you do as a moderator", "the space for the candidates to provide their answers. Not every question was", "is the best example? > 5. In what way do you feel that", "they finish reading everything you have written, and also including a link to", "a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to", "on meta best exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this", "improve the onboarding and also improve the welcome felt by new posters to", "for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into", "order of submission. To save scrolling here are links to the submissions from", "time period you are available for moderating our site everyday? Please specify the", "on moderation? Why do you feel this is the best example? > 5.", "have been? > 8. What do you think the moderators' role should be", "name at the top of your post so that readers will know who", "as a transcript for voters to view the thoughts of their candidates, and", "you are available for moderating our site everyday? Please specify the answer in", "shouldn't have been? > 8. What do you think the moderators' role should", "our site everyday? Please specify the answer in UTC format. > 2. New", "To save scrolling here are links to the submissions from each candidate (in", "links to the submissions from each candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058)", "by new posters to Academia SE? > 3. Do you have any previous", "submitted by the community, plus 2 pre-set questions from us. As a candidate,", "Election page. Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and when you've", "circumstances will you delete comments? > 10. What is your stance about the", "but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 7.", "list of links in the order of submission. To save scrolling here are", "what circumstances will you delete comments? > 10. What is your stance about", "first set of three dashes](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/revisions/e8d27060-4042-427c-8243-033b830481fa/view-source).Please consider putting your name at the top of", "it after this blurb here, before that set of three dashes. Please leave", "welcome felt by new posters to Academia SE? > 3. Do you have", "situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't have been?", "the top of your post so that readers will know who you are", "your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the first set of three", "comply with the current scope? Should we be lenient and keep open questions", "in between each, suitable for you to insert your answers. Just [copy the", "plus 2 pre-set questions from us. As a candidate, your job is simple", "forums etc.)? > 4. What question or answer of yours on meta best", "etc.)? > 4. What question or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies", "would you do as a moderator to improve the onboarding and also improve", "are before they finish reading everything you have written, and also including a", "to your answer on your nomination post. Once all the answers have been", "what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more", "the order of submission. To save scrolling here are links to the submissions", "link to your answer on your nomination post. Once all the answers have", "into this one, which shall now serve as the space for the candidates", "Please specify the answer in UTC format. > 2. New users and posters", "for you to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the", "Do you have any previous experience as a moderator, either on Stack Exchange", "the questions in quote format with a break in between each, suitable for", "you are before they finish reading everything you have written, and also including", "community, plus 2 pre-set questions from us. As a candidate, your job is", "also including a link to your answer on your nomination post. Once all", "period you are available for moderating our site everyday? Please specify the answer", "simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? > 6. How would you deal with", "shall now serve as the space for the candidates to provide their answers.", "answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? >", "2 pre-set questions from us. As a candidate, your job is simple -", "you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed", "with the moderator elections, we are holding a Q&A thread for the candidates.", "your answer on your nomination post. Once all the answers have been compiled,", "of arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How would you handle a situation where", "Oh, and when you've completed your answer, please provide a link to it", "the current scope? Should we be lenient and keep open questions that can", "should affect moderation decisions, given its frequency? > 9. Comments can be tricky", "with the current scope? Should we be lenient and keep open questions that", "how this is enforced? Should we close any question that does not strictly", "For your convenience, I will include all of the questions in quote format", "moderator to improve the onboarding and also improve the welcome felt by new", "rep? > 6. How would you deal with a user who produced a", "from us. As a candidate, your job is simple - post an answer", "a large number of arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How would you handle", "even if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow or broaden the scope? > >", "all the answers have been compiled, this will serve as a transcript for", "answer in UTC format. > 2. New users and posters tend to struggle", "the Election page. Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and when", "in that same answer. For your convenience, I will include all of the", "include all of the questions in quote format with a break in between", "the best example? > 5. In what way do you feel that being", "before that set of three dashes. Please leave the list of links in", "Why do you feel this is the best example? > 5. In what", "this is enforced? Should we close any question that does not strictly comply", "answers have been compiled, this will serve as a transcript for voters to", "post an answer to this question, citing each of the questions and then", "answers even if borderline off-topic? Should we narrow or broaden the scope? >", "questions as submitted by the community, plus 2 pre-set questions from us. As", "frequency? > 9. Comments can be tricky to deal with, and are often", "questions, given their potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users from the network? How", "the current scope of Academia Stack Exchange and how this is enforced? Should", "finish reading everything you have written, and also including a link to your", "you feel this is the best example? > 5. In what way do", "a transcript for voters to view the thoughts of their candidates, and will", "you've completed your answer, please provide a link to it after this blurb", "in quote format with a break in between each, suitable for you to", "and \"passerby\" users from the network? How do you think presence on the", "What is the time period you are available for moderating our site everyday?", "which shall now serve as the space for the candidates to provide their", "posters to Academia SE? > 3. Do you have any previous experience as", "with, and are often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances will", "who you are before they finish reading everything you have written, and also", "are holding a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier", "candidate, your job is simple - post an answer to this question, citing", "consider putting your name at the top of your post so that readers", "> 4. What question or answer of yours on meta best exemplifies your", "would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable", "handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a question that you feel shouldn't", "candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458) have been compiled into this one,", "candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck to", "How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of", "on your nomination post. Once all the answers have been compiled, this will", "that set of three dashes. Please leave the list of links in the", "not strictly comply with the current scope? Should we be lenient and keep", "communities (e.g. newsgroups, forums etc.)? > 4. What question or answer of yours", "their candidates, and will be appropriately linked in the Election page. Good luck", "exemplifies your philosophy on moderation? Why do you feel this is the best", "potential for controversy and \"passerby\" users from the network? How do you think", "your time zone? What is the time period you are available for moderating", "in the Election page. Good luck to all of the candidates! Oh, and", "have any previous experience as a moderator, either on Stack Exchange or on", "number of arguments/flags from comments? > 7. How would you handle a situation", "often flagged as obsolete/no longer needed. Under what circumstances will you delete comments?", "holding a Q&A thread for the candidates. Questions collected [from an earlier thread](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4537/32458)", "from each candidate (in order of submission): [Massimo Ortolano](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4564/20058) [cag51](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4566/79875) [M'vy](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4568/32458) --- >", "of the questions and then post your answer to each question given in", "this is the best example? > 5. In what way do you feel", "steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of", "this blurb here, before that set of three dashes. Please leave the list", "a moderator to improve the onboarding and also improve the welcome felt by", "> 7. How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc a", "more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? > 6.", "to insert your answers. Just [copy the whole thing after the first set", "quote format with a break in between each, suitable for you to insert", "so that readers will know who you are before they finish reading everything", "provide a link to it after this blurb here, before that set of" ]
[ "is that it seems even experienced users with moderation capabilities don't care too", "question and remove spurious and spam answers, until the moderators closed it finally,", "no an equal approach to judge which questions are off-topic or primarily-opinion based?", "there is no an equal approach to judge which questions are off-topic or", "the fact that it is obviously off-topic and opinion based. The other issue", "Why there is no an equal approach to judge which questions are off-topic", "[for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question again: Why there is", "question, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount", "people preferred to put some answers in the hope of getting reputation, which", "very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question again: Why", "I ask my question again: Why there is no an equal approach to", "is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount of attention (> 8k views until", "it seems even experienced users with moderation capabilities don't care too much about", "it is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount of attention (> 8k views", "huge amount of attention (> 8k views until now) and as a result,", "lot of attentions, surprisingly not just from new users even from experienced users", "put some answers in the hope of getting reputation, which I think it", "relevant questions have gotten closed already less than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion", "it worked very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question", "it finally, despite the fact that many more relevant questions have gotten closed", "after several flagging and reporting to close this question and remove spurious and", "with moderation capabilities, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic and opinion", "gotten closed already less than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern", "and what is off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't have an equal approach", "getting reputation, which I think it worked very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164).", "to put some answers in the hope of getting reputation, which I think", "to close this question and remove spurious and spam answers, until the moderators", "don't care too much about guidelines that say what is on-topic and what", "have an equal approach to judge the questions. My guess here is that", "as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern is that it seems even experienced", "even experienced users with moderation capabilities don't care too much about guidelines that", "that it is obviously off-topic and opinion based. The other issue is that", "many more relevant questions have gotten closed already less than minutes as off-topic", "despite the fact that many more relevant questions have gotten closed already less", "some answers in the hope of getting reputation, which I think it worked", "now) and as a result, people preferred to put some answers in the", "questions. My guess here is that because this question, despite the fact that", "guidelines that say what is on-topic and what is off-topic here in Academia.SE", "to judge the questions. My guess here is that because this question, despite", "users even from experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite the fact that it", "obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount of attention (> 8k views until now)", "this question, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge", "guess here is that because this question, despite the fact that it is", "the fact that many more relevant questions have gotten closed already less than", "this question and remove spurious and spam answers, until the moderators closed it", "moderation capabilities, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic and opinion based.", "from experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite the fact that it is obviously", "ask my question again: Why there is no an equal approach to judge", "equal approach to judge the questions. My guess here is that because this", "questions have gotten closed already less than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based.", "judge the questions. My guess here is that because this question, despite the", "despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic and opinion based. The other", "spam answers, until the moderators closed it finally, despite the fact that many", "what is off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't have an equal approach to", "because this question, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic, attracted a", "don't have an equal approach to judge the questions. My guess here is", "and remove spurious and spam answers, until the moderators closed it finally, despite", "too much about guidelines that say what is on-topic and what is off-topic", "views until now) and as a result, people preferred to put some answers", "people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question again: Why there is no an", "until the moderators closed it finally, despite the fact that many more relevant", "than \"2 days\" after several flagging and reporting to close this question and", "some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question again: Why there is no", "that say what is on-topic and what is off-topic here in Academia.SE and", "think it worked very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my", "attention (> 8k views until now) and as a result, people preferred to", "as a result, people preferred to put some answers in the hope of", "based. The other issue is that it took more than \"2 days\" after", "Recently, [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/137528/98164) attracted a lot of attentions, surprisingly not just from new", "attracted a huge amount of attention (> 8k views until now) and as", "is no an equal approach to judge which questions are off-topic or primarily-opinion", "here is that because this question, despite the fact that it is obviously", "well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question again: Why there", "minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern is that it seems even", "I think it worked very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask", "that it took more than \"2 days\" after several flagging and reporting to", "attentions, surprisingly not just from new users even from experienced users with moderation", "experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic", "\"2 days\" after several flagging and reporting to close this question and remove", "than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern is that it seems", "it is obviously off-topic and opinion based. The other issue is that it", "reporting to close this question and remove spurious and spam answers, until the", "on-topic and what is off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't have an equal", "here in Academia.SE and don't have an equal approach to judge the questions.", "that it is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount of attention (> 8k", "based. My concern is that it seems even experienced users with moderation capabilities", "a huge amount of attention (> 8k views until now) and as a", "question again: Why there is no an equal approach to judge which questions", "and don't have an equal approach to judge the questions. My guess here", "reputation, which I think it worked very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So", "that it seems even experienced users with moderation capabilities don't care too much", "here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question again: Why there is no an equal", "care too much about guidelines that say what is on-topic and what is", "primarily-opinion based. My concern is that it seems even experienced users with moderation", "fact that many more relevant questions have gotten closed already less than minutes", "of getting reputation, which I think it worked very well [for some people", "which I think it worked very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I", "of attention (> 8k views until now) and as a result, people preferred", "spurious and spam answers, until the moderators closed it finally, despite the fact", "The other issue is that it took more than \"2 days\" after several", "8k views until now) and as a result, people preferred to put some", "answers in the hope of getting reputation, which I think it worked very", "flagging and reporting to close this question and remove spurious and spam answers,", "closed already less than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern is", "off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern is that it seems even experienced users", "My concern is that it seems even experienced users with moderation capabilities don't", "less than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern is that it", "capabilities, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic and opinion based. The", "attracted a lot of attentions, surprisingly not just from new users even from", "fact that it is obviously off-topic and opinion based. The other issue is", "concern is that it seems even experienced users with moderation capabilities don't care", "a lot of attentions, surprisingly not just from new users even from experienced", "is that it took more than \"2 days\" after several flagging and reporting", "not just from new users even from experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite", "much about guidelines that say what is on-topic and what is off-topic here", "in Academia.SE and don't have an equal approach to judge the questions. My", "just from new users even from experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite the", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/137528/98164) attracted a lot of attentions, surprisingly not just from new users", "despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount of", "my question again: Why there is no an equal approach to judge which", "obviously off-topic and opinion based. The other issue is that it took more", "users with moderation capabilities don't care too much about guidelines that say what", "the questions. My guess here is that because this question, despite the fact", "answers, until the moderators closed it finally, despite the fact that many more", "Academia.SE and don't have an equal approach to judge the questions. My guess", "several flagging and reporting to close this question and remove spurious and spam", "surprisingly not just from new users even from experienced users with moderation capabilities,", "users with moderation capabilities, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic and", "closed it finally, despite the fact that many more relevant questions have gotten", "about guidelines that say what is on-topic and what is off-topic here in", "(> 8k views until now) and as a result, people preferred to put", "hope of getting reputation, which I think it worked very well [for some", "seems even experienced users with moderation capabilities don't care too much about guidelines", "moderation capabilities don't care too much about guidelines that say what is on-topic", "the fact that it is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount of attention", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/137528/98164) attracted a lot of attentions, surprisingly not just from new users even", "is that because this question, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic,", "with moderation capabilities don't care too much about guidelines that say what is", "approach to judge the questions. My guess here is that because this question,", "opinion based. The other issue is that it took more than \"2 days\"", "in the hope of getting reputation, which I think it worked very well", "again: Why there is no an equal approach to judge which questions are", "issue is that it took more than \"2 days\" after several flagging and", "and opinion based. The other issue is that it took more than \"2", "what is on-topic and what is off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't have", "My guess here is that because this question, despite the fact that it", "So I ask my question again: Why there is no an equal approach", "took more than \"2 days\" after several flagging and reporting to close this", "amount of attention (> 8k views until now) and as a result, people", "result, people preferred to put some answers in the hope of getting reputation,", "the moderators closed it finally, despite the fact that many more relevant questions", "already less than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My concern is that", "it took more than \"2 days\" after several flagging and reporting to close", "say what is on-topic and what is off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't", "and reporting to close this question and remove spurious and spam answers, until", "have gotten closed already less than minutes as off-topic or primarily-opinion based. My", "fact that it is obviously off-topic, attracted a huge amount of attention (>", "a result, people preferred to put some answers in the hope of getting", "is on-topic and what is off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't have an", "worked very well [for some people here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/137531/98164). So I ask my question again:", "close this question and remove spurious and spam answers, until the moderators closed", "is obviously off-topic and opinion based. The other issue is that it took", "of attentions, surprisingly not just from new users even from experienced users with", "new users even from experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite the fact that", "days\" after several flagging and reporting to close this question and remove spurious", "preferred to put some answers in the hope of getting reputation, which I", "and spam answers, until the moderators closed it finally, despite the fact that", "even from experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite the fact that it is", "more relevant questions have gotten closed already less than minutes as off-topic or", "that many more relevant questions have gotten closed already less than minutes as", "off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't have an equal approach to judge the", "remove spurious and spam answers, until the moderators closed it finally, despite the", "experienced users with moderation capabilities don't care too much about guidelines that say", "an equal approach to judge the questions. My guess here is that because", "that because this question, despite the fact that it is obviously off-topic, attracted", "more than \"2 days\" after several flagging and reporting to close this question", "from new users even from experienced users with moderation capabilities, despite the fact", "or primarily-opinion based. My concern is that it seems even experienced users with", "and as a result, people preferred to put some answers in the hope", "off-topic, attracted a huge amount of attention (> 8k views until now) and", "the hope of getting reputation, which I think it worked very well [for", "other issue is that it took more than \"2 days\" after several flagging", "until now) and as a result, people preferred to put some answers in", "moderators closed it finally, despite the fact that many more relevant questions have", "off-topic and opinion based. The other issue is that it took more than", "is off-topic here in Academia.SE and don't have an equal approach to judge", "capabilities don't care too much about guidelines that say what is on-topic and", "finally, despite the fact that many more relevant questions have gotten closed already" ]
[ "taking time off because I think I can be a positive influence in", "still interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have resigned", "expressed by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do not", "moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees removed stars from dissenting", "interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have resigned or", "SE team in their lack of support for our community and in particular", "in particular the LGBT+ members. The SE team is proposing changes to the", "of our LGBT+ users. That said I am extremely disappointed by the SE", "of discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested", "betrayed because they have muddied the waters regarding their efforts to support our", "have muddied the waters regarding their efforts to support our community. About a", "positive influence in helping support the needs of our LGBT+ users. That said", "of one of her most holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed because they", "of SE's incompetence in instituting changes to be more welcoming to LGBT+ users.", "in their lack of support for our community and in particular the LGBT+", "(e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While I do not believe the fired", "the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have resigned or are taking time off", "yet again failed to deliver on this promise and is again letting our", "fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While", "efforts to support our community. About a year ago, SE revisited their [theory", "Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have", "I do not believe the fired moderator was without fault (in my opinion", "time off because I think I can be a positive influence in helping", "is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of", "team in their lack of support for our community and in particular the", "from dissenting comments in the private moderator chat room where the changes to", "moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has yet again failed", "of the issues LGBT+ users face are well expressed by [Aza in their", "do not care about these issues from having to read on, the bottom", "from having to read on, the bottom line is that I will NOT", "about removing her (including the timing on the eve of one of her", "for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees removed stars from", "SE's incompetence in instituting changes to be more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some", "having to read on, the bottom line is that I will NOT be", "issues LGBT+ users face are well expressed by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice).", "muddied the waters regarding their efforts to support our community. About a year", "what SE employees have shared with us and how they went about removing", "about these issues from having to read on, the bottom line is that", "our community and in particular the LGBT+ members. The SE team is proposing", "lot of discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still", "LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees removed stars from dissenting comments in the", "helping support the needs of our LGBT+ users. That said I am extremely", "not believe the fired moderator was without fault (in my opinion her behavior", "unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have shared with us and how", "that arose out of SE's incompetence in instituting changes to be more welcoming", "in instituting changes to be more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of the", "support of her. While I do not believe the fired moderator was without", "SE employees removed stars from dissenting comments in the private moderator chat room", "to support our community. About a year ago, SE revisited their [theory of", "LGBT+ members. The SE team is proposing changes to the Code of Conduct", "Some of the issues LGBT+ users face are well expressed by [Aza in", "harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees removed stars", "users and moderators down. The SE team has lost an opportunity to proactively", "her most holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed because they have muddied the", "without fault (in my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE", "was without fault (in my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what", "fired moderator was without fault (in my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+", "[the most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down (e.g.,", "users face are well expressed by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent", "While I do not believe the fired moderator was without fault (in my", "will NOT be resigning or taking time off because I think I can", "moderators have resigned or are taking time off in relation to issues that", "To prevent people who do not care about these issues from having to", "The SE team is proposing changes to the Code of Conduct that I", "users/moderators), what SE employees have shared with us and how they went about", "is that I will NOT be resigning or taking time off because I", "comments in the private moderator chat room where the changes to the CoC", "out of SE's incompetence in instituting changes to be more welcoming to LGBT+", "letting our LGBT+ users and moderators down. The SE team has lost an", "issues from having to read on, the bottom line is that I will", "LGBT+ users and moderators down. The SE team has lost an opportunity to", "community. About a year ago, SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised", "[Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with", "fault (in my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees", "community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have resigned or are taking time off in", "year ago, SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support.", "in the private moderator chat room where the changes to the CoC were", "discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in", "I think I can be a positive influence in helping support the needs", "are well expressed by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who", "members are respected. SE employees removed stars from dissenting comments in the private", "employees have shared with us and how they went about removing her (including", "the fired moderator was without fault (in my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt", "that I think will make it harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members", "behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have shared with us and", "regarding their efforts to support our community. About a year ago, SE revisited", "off in relation to issues that arose out of SE's incompetence in instituting", "regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating", "be a lot of discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack", "for our community and in particular the LGBT+ members. The SE team is", "and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has yet", "one of her most holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed because they have", "can be a positive influence in helping support the needs of our LGBT+", "LGBT+ users face are well expressed by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To", "instituting changes to be more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of the issues", "relation to issues that arose out of SE's incompetence in instituting changes to", "issues that arose out of SE's incompetence in instituting changes to be more", "waters regarding their efforts to support our community. About a year ago, SE", "moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While I do not", "by the SE team in their lack of support for our community and", "SE team is proposing changes to the Code of Conduct that I think", "That said I am extremely disappointed by the SE team in their lack", "how they went about removing her (including the timing on the eve of", "users. Some of the issues LGBT+ users face are well expressed by [Aza", "being discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators", "time off in relation to issues that arose out of SE's incompetence in", "to be more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of the issues LGBT+ users", "be resigning or taking time off because I think I can be a", "face are well expressed by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people", "The SE team has lost an opportunity to proactively provide us with the", "promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has yet again", "to read on, the bottom line is that I will NOT be resigning", "is again letting our LGBT+ users and moderators down. The SE team has", "me feel betrayed because they have muddied the waters regarding their efforts to", "discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step", "mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the", "ago, SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency.", "am extremely disappointed by the SE team in their lack of support for", "do not believe the fired moderator was without fault (in my opinion her", "Autonomy. The SE team has yet again failed to deliver on this promise", "Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down", "read on, the bottom line is that I will NOT be resigning or", "of support for our community and in particular the LGBT+ members. The SE", "make it harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees", "A number of moderators have resigned or are taking time off in relation", "think will make it harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are respected.", "welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of the issues LGBT+ users face are well", "our LGBT+ users. That said I am extremely disappointed by the SE team", "with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have resigned or are taking time", "on, the bottom line is that I will NOT be resigning or taking", "to the Code of Conduct that I think will make it harder for", "dissenting comments in the private moderator chat room where the changes to the", "support the needs of our LGBT+ users. That said I am extremely disappointed", "I will NOT be resigning or taking time off because I think I", "in relation to issues that arose out of SE's incompetence in instituting changes", "have resigned or are taking time off in relation to issues that arose", "LGBT+ users. Some of the issues LGBT+ users face are well expressed by", "went about removing her (including the timing on the eve of one of", "and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper).", "NOT be resigning or taking time off because I think I can be", "to deliver on this promise and is again letting our LGBT+ users and", "and moderators down. The SE team has lost an opportunity to proactively provide", "has yet again failed to deliver on this promise and is again letting", "failed to deliver on this promise and is again letting our LGBT+ users", "the private moderator chat room where the changes to the CoC were being", "[theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE", "moderators down. The SE team has lost an opportunity to proactively provide us", "users. That said I am extremely disappointed by the SE team in their", "chat room where the changes to the CoC were being discussed. Further, [the", "relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number", "the LGBT+ members. The SE team is proposing changes to the Code of", "our community. About a year ago, SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and", "extremely disappointed by the SE team in their lack of support for our", "to ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees removed stars from dissenting comments", "forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A", "resigned or are taking time off in relation to issues that arose out", "team has yet again failed to deliver on this promise and is again", "of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team", "Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do not care about these issues from having", "that I will NOT be resigning or taking time off because I think", "makes me feel betrayed because they have muddied the waters regarding their efforts", "who do not care about these issues from having to read on, the", "members. The SE team is proposing changes to the Code of Conduct that", "their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do not care about these issues", "team has lost an opportunity to proactively provide us with the support we", "they have muddied the waters regarding their efforts to support our community. About", "private moderator chat room where the changes to the CoC were being discussed.", "be more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of the issues LGBT+ users face", "down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While I do not believe the", "hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have shared with us and how they", "of moderators have resigned or are taking time off in relation to issues", "moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has", "incompetence in instituting changes to be more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of", "the changes to the CoC were being discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting", "ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees removed stars from dissenting comments in", "these issues from having to read on, the bottom line is that I", "the timing on the eve of one of her most holy holidays) makes", "SE team has yet again failed to deliver on this promise and is", "stars from dissenting comments in the private moderator chat room where the changes", "revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy.", "in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have resigned or are", "their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The", "lack of support for our community and in particular the LGBT+ members. The", "eve of one of her most holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed because", "SE team has lost an opportunity to proactively provide us with the support", "off because I think I can be a positive influence in helping support", "resigning or taking time off because I think I can be a positive", "prevent people who do not care about these issues from having to read", "particular the LGBT+ members. The SE team is proposing changes to the Code", "opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have shared with", "was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her.", "has be a lot of discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing: is", "needs of our LGBT+ users. That said I am extremely disappointed by the", "again letting our LGBT+ users and moderators down. The SE team has lost", "in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do not care about these", "Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has yet again failed to", "influence in helping support the needs of our LGBT+ users. That said I", "Recently there has be a lot of discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced", "The SE team has yet again failed to deliver on this promise and", "Code of Conduct that I think will make it harder for moderators to", "they went about removing her (including the timing on the eve of one", "think I can be a positive influence in helping support the needs of", "on the eve of one of her most holy holidays) makes me feel", "by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do not care", "other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While I do", "LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have shared with us and how they went", "are respected. SE employees removed stars from dissenting comments in the private moderator", "most holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed because they have muddied the waters", "changes to be more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of the issues LGBT+", "their lack of support for our community and in particular the LGBT+ members.", "Conduct that I think will make it harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+", "SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust. Support. Agency. Accountability.", "because they have muddied the waters regarding their efforts to support our community.", "About a year ago, SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators", "where the changes to the CoC were being discussed. Further, [the most strongly", "changes to the CoC were being discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator", "line is that I will NOT be resigning or taking time off because", "(in my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have", "the issues LGBT+ users face are well expressed by [Aza in their Resignation", "disappointed by the SE team in their lack of support for our community", "in support of her. While I do not believe the fired moderator was", "and in particular the LGBT+ members. The SE team is proposing changes to", "promise and is again letting our LGBT+ users and moderators down. The SE", "the needs of our LGBT+ users. That said I am extremely disappointed by", "I am extremely disappointed by the SE team in their lack of support", "I can be a positive influence in helping support the needs of our", "bottom line is that I will NOT be resigning or taking time off", "are taking time off in relation to issues that arose out of SE's", "were being discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other", "(including the timing on the eve of one of her most holy holidays)", "[Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do not care about", "our LGBT+ users and moderators down. The SE team has lost an opportunity", "my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have shared", "believe the fired moderator was without fault (in my opinion her behavior unintentionally", "care about these issues from having to read on, the bottom line is", "deliver on this promise and is again letting our LGBT+ users and moderators", "of Conduct that I think will make it harder for moderators to ensure", "the waters regarding their efforts to support our community. About a year ago,", "strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in", "not care about these issues from having to read on, the bottom line", "a year ago, SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/) and promised moderators Trust.", "removed stars from dissenting comments in the private moderator chat room where the", "support for our community and in particular the LGBT+ members. The SE team", "proposing changes to the Code of Conduct that I think will make it", "Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has yet again failed to deliver on this", "and is again letting our LGBT+ users and moderators down. The SE team", "and how they went about removing her (including the timing on the eve", "a positive influence in helping support the needs of our LGBT+ users. That", "of her most holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed because they have muddied", "the eve of one of her most holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed", "moderator was without fault (in my opinion her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators),", "room where the changes to the CoC were being discussed. Further, [the most", "her behavior unintentionally hurt LGBT+ users/moderators), what SE employees have shared with us", "us and how they went about removing her (including the timing on the", "the SE team in their lack of support for our community and in", "with us and how they went about removing her (including the timing on", "the bottom line is that I will NOT be resigning or taking time", "dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support", "respected. SE employees removed stars from dissenting comments in the private moderator chat", "SE employees have shared with us and how they went about removing her", "it harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE employees removed", "this promise and is again letting our LGBT+ users and moderators down. The", "a lot of discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing: is Stack Exchange", "feel betrayed because they have muddied the waters regarding their efforts to support", "or taking time off because I think I can be a positive influence", "their efforts to support our community. About a year ago, SE revisited their", "to LGBT+ users. Some of the issues LGBT+ users face are well expressed", "to the CoC were being discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator was", "in helping support the needs of our LGBT+ users. That said I am", "community and in particular the LGBT+ members. The SE team is proposing changes", "most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator))", "cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators have resigned or are taking", "the Code of Conduct that I think will make it harder for moderators", "or are taking time off in relation to issues that arose out of", "Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has yet again failed to deliver on", "shared with us and how they went about removing her (including the timing", "Stack Exchange still interested in cooperating with the community?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper). A number of moderators", "Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do not care about these issues from", "said I am extremely disappointed by the SE team in their lack of", "holidays) makes me feel betrayed because they have muddied the waters regarding their", "of her. While I do not believe the fired moderator was without fault", "again failed to deliver on this promise and is again letting our LGBT+", "will make it harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are respected. SE", "on this promise and is again letting our LGBT+ users and moderators down.", "and other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While I", "taking time off in relation to issues that arose out of SE's incompetence", "more welcoming to LGBT+ users. Some of the issues LGBT+ users face are", "because I think I can be a positive influence in helping support the", "moderator chat room where the changes to the CoC were being discussed. Further,", "team is proposing changes to the Code of Conduct that I think will", "there has be a lot of discussion regarding [Firing mods and forced relicensing:", "timing on the eve of one of her most holy holidays) makes me", "step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While I do not believe", "down. The SE team has lost an opportunity to proactively provide us with", "arose out of SE's incompetence in instituting changes to be more welcoming to", "support our community. About a year ago, SE revisited their [theory of moderation](https://stackoverflow.blog/2018/11/21/our-theory-of-moderation-re-visited/)", "her (including the timing on the eve of one of her most holy", "has lost an opportunity to proactively provide us with the support we need.", "removing her (including the timing on the eve of one of her most", "employees removed stars from dissenting comments in the private moderator chat room where", "number of moderators have resigned or are taking time off in relation to", "is proposing changes to the Code of Conduct that I think will make", "I think will make it harder for moderators to ensure LGBT+ members are", "have shared with us and how they went about removing her (including the", "the CoC were being discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel)", "to issues that arose out of SE's incompetence in instituting changes to be", "people who do not care about these issues from having to read on,", "CoC were being discussed. Further, [the most strongly dissenting moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and", "moderator was fired](https://judaism.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5193/stack-overflow-inc-sinat-chinam-and-the-goat-for-azazel) and other moderators step down (e.g., [Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of", "her. While I do not believe the fired moderator was without fault (in", "Support. Agency. Accountability. Autonomy. The SE team has yet again failed to deliver", "[Gilles](https://cs.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1650/i-am-resigning-as-a-moderator)) in support of her. While I do not believe the fired moderator", "LGBT+ users. That said I am extremely disappointed by the SE team in", "be a positive influence in helping support the needs of our LGBT+ users.", "changes to the Code of Conduct that I think will make it harder", "well expressed by [Aza in their Resignation Notice](https://literature.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/resignation-notice). To prevent people who do", "holy holidays) makes me feel betrayed because they have muddied the waters regarding" ]
[ "as they learn the ropes! Also, please join me in thanking aeismail who", "crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with", "[![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for", "Also, please join me in thanking aeismail who will be stepping down as", "on how the voting played out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3),", "They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share", "moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank", "a close, the votes have been tallied and the two new moderators are:", "be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your", "existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice", "and advice with them as they learn the ropes! Also, please join me", "be stepping down as moderator. For details on how the voting played out,", "For details on how the voting played out, you can download the election", "the voting played out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3), or [view", "thanking aeismail who will be stepping down as moderator. For details on how", "shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them", "the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing", "and share your assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes!", "in thanking aeismail who will be stepping down as moderator. For details on", "moderator election](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) has come to a close, the votes have been tallied and", "with them as they learn the ropes! Also, please join me in thanking", "how the voting played out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3), or", "for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as they learn", "played out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3), or [view a summary", "join me in thanking aeismail who will be stepping down as moderator. For", "election](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) has come to a close, the votes have been tallied and the", "them as they learn the ropes! Also, please join me in thanking aeismail", "two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators)", "learn the ropes! Also, please join me in thanking aeismail who will be", "will be stepping down as moderator. For details on how the voting played", "joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance", "have been tallied and the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll", "votes have been tallied and the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51)", "to a close, the votes have been tallied and the two new moderators", "[![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and", "[the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and", "the ropes! Also, please join me in thanking aeismail who will be stepping", "aeismail who will be stepping down as moderator. For details on how the", "out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3), or [view a summary report", "you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3), or [view a summary report online](https://www.opavote.com/results/5950916555440128/0).", "me in thanking aeismail who will be stepping down as moderator. For details", "the votes have been tallied and the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano)", "ropes! Also, please join me in thanking aeismail who will be stepping down", "been tallied and the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be", "new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please", "as moderator. For details on how the voting played out, you can download", "down as moderator. For details on how the voting played out, you can", "Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them for volunteering,", "your assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes! Also, please", "moderator. For details on how the voting played out, you can download the", "details on how the voting played out, you can download the election results", "they learn the ropes! Also, please join me in thanking aeismail who will", "and the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the", "has come to a close, the votes have been tallied and the two", "advice with them as they learn the ropes! Also, please join me in", "voting played out, you can download the election results [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3), or [view a", "who will be stepping down as moderator. For details on how the voting", "assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes! Also, please join", "thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as", "please join me in thanking aeismail who will be stepping down as moderator.", "tallied and the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining", "stepping down as moderator. For details on how the voting played out, you", "are: [![Muvdimo Ortolano](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/20058.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20058/massimo-ortolano) [![cag51](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/flair/79875.png)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/79875/cag51) They'll be joining [the existing crew](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators) shortly—please thank them", "close, the votes have been tallied and the two new moderators are: [![Muvdimo", "them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as they", "Academia's [third moderator election](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) has come to a close, the votes have been", "[third moderator election](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/3) has come to a close, the votes have been tallied", "come to a close, the votes have been tallied and the two new", "volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as they learn the", "share your assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes! Also," ]
[ "to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've decided to move forward", "to, and provide meta-information about posts\" and warns that comments are subject to", "mods should do \"what the community wants.\" So my question is: how does", "a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods should do \"what", "if, they are flagged by other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances).", "the community wants.\" So my question is: how does the community want its", "the community want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion.", "Thanks for the discussion. We've decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to", "comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods should do \"what the", "As I practice swinging this hammer, I find myself confronted with this more", "[this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the", "currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they are flagged by other users", "do \"what the community wants.\" So my question is: how does the community", "corrections to, and provide meta-information about posts\" and warns that comments are subject", "provide meta-information about posts\" and warns that comments are subject to deletion. In", "this discussion a bit more so we can produce a well-defined policy. Please", "upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the downvoted posts suggest", "handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've decided to move forward with", "this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask for clarification", "suggested that mods should do \"what the community wants.\" So my question is:", "to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion a bit more", "confronted with this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask", "subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can", "answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or empirical data) are apparently allowed, while others get", "and only if, they are flagged by other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying", "posts suggest that they should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested", "StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections to,", "practice swinging this hammer, I find myself confronted with this more and more.", "are subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments", "posts\" and warns that comments are subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the", "they are flagged by other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In", "only if, they are flagged by other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all", "that comments should \"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information", "if, and only if, they are flagged by other users (rather than proactively", "a bit more so we can produce a well-defined policy. Please participate in", "to structure this discussion a bit more so we can produce a well-defined", "instances). In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods should", "to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be", "is suggested that mods should do \"what the community wants.\" So my question", "can be good, while the downvoted posts suggest that they should be deleted.", "that comments are subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain", "they should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our mods", "empirical data) are apparently allowed, while others get deleted. As I practice swinging", "and warns that comments are subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted", "should \"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information about posts\"", "downvoted posts suggest that they should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is", "so we can produce a well-defined policy. Please participate in this discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4600/79875)", "\"what the community wants.\" So my question is: how does the community want", "the downvoted posts suggest that they should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it", "it is suggested that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if,", "question is: how does the community want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update:", "suggestion to structure this discussion a bit more so we can produce a", "(rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it", "apparently allowed, while others get deleted. As I practice swinging this hammer, I", "is that comments should \"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections to, and provide", "users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875),", "deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good,", "suggested that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they are", "move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion a bit more so", "discussion a bit more so we can produce a well-defined policy. Please participate", "that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they are flagged", "decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion a bit", "answers, or empirical data) are apparently allowed, while others get deleted. As I", "I have never understood why some answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or empirical data)", "by other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment to", "(or partial answers, or empirical data) are apparently allowed, while others get deleted.", "good, while the downvoted posts suggest that they should be deleted. In [this", "our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they are flagged by", "Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion a bit more so we can produce", "partial answers, or empirical data) are apparently allowed, while others get deleted. As", "are apparently allowed, while others get deleted. As I practice swinging this hammer,", "more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask for clarification on,", "and provide meta-information about posts\" and warns that comments are subject to deletion.", "others get deleted. As I practice swinging this hammer, I find myself confronted", "is suggested that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they", "does the community want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the", "community want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've", "allowed, while others get deleted. As I practice swinging this hammer, I find", "be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our mods currently delete", "while others get deleted. As I practice swinging this hammer, I find myself", "all instances). In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods", "why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the downvoted posts suggest that they should", "get deleted. As I practice swinging this hammer, I find myself confronted with", "[guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections to, and", "never understood why some answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or empirical data) are apparently", "Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion", "community wants.\" So my question is: how does the community want its mods", "more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections", "comments are subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why", "discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the downvoted", "[this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and", "the discussion. We've decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this", "its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've decided to", "[this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods should do \"what the community wants.\"", "explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the downvoted posts suggest that they", "forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion a bit more so we", "suggest that they should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that", "mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've decided to move", "posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the downvoted posts suggest that", "that mods should do \"what the community wants.\" So my question is: how", "clarification on, suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information about posts\" and warns that", "how does the community want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for", "more so we can produce a well-defined policy. Please participate in this discussion", "is: how does the community want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks", "have never understood why some answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or empirical data) are", "while the downvoted posts suggest that they should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted),", "and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask for clarification on, suggest", "want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've decided", "myself confronted with this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should", "I find myself confronted with this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that", "than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is", "I practice swinging this hammer, I find myself confronted with this more and", "swinging this hammer, I find myself confronted with this more and more. StackExchange's", "In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if,", "some answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or empirical data) are apparently allowed, while others", "mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they are flagged by other", "are flagged by other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a", "should do \"what the community wants.\" So my question is: how does the", "delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they are flagged by other users (rather", "with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion a bit more so we can", "my question is: how does the community want its mods to handle answers-in-the-comments?", "flagged by other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment", "other users (rather than proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment to [this", "suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information about posts\" and warns that comments are", "In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while", "answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods should do \"what the community wants.\" So", "that they should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our", "answers-in-the-comments? Update: Thanks for the discussion. We've decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's", "hammer, I find myself confronted with this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is", "comments-in-the-answers if, and only if, they are flagged by other users (rather than", "data) are apparently allowed, while others get deleted. As I practice swinging this", "warns that comments are subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments), the upvoted posts", "this hammer, I find myself confronted with this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work)", "understood why some answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or empirical data) are apparently allowed,", "should be deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our mods currently", "wants.\" So my question is: how does the community want its mods to", "on, suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information about posts\" and warns that comments", "discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers if, and only", "discussion. We've decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion", "bit more so we can produce a well-defined policy. Please participate in this", "We've decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure this discussion a", "why some answers-in-the-comments (or partial answers, or empirical data) are apparently allowed, while", "with this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments should \"ask for", "to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods should do \"what the community", "finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that", "for the discussion. We've decided to move forward with Wrzlprmft's suggestion to structure", "deleted. As I practice swinging this hammer, I find myself confronted with this", "it is suggested that mods should do \"what the community wants.\" So my", "or empirical data) are apparently allowed, while others get deleted. As I practice", "find myself confronted with this more and more. StackExchange's [guidance](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/19756/how-do-comments-work) is that comments", "comments should \"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information about", "proactively finding-and-destroying all instances). In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested", "the upvoted posts explain why answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the downvoted posts", "be good, while the downvoted posts suggest that they should be deleted. In", "structure this discussion a bit more so we can produce a well-defined policy.", "In a comment to [this answer](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4536/79875), it is suggested that mods should do", "\"ask for clarification on, suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information about posts\" and", "answers-in-the-comments can be good, while the downvoted posts suggest that they should be", "meta-information about posts\" and warns that comments are subject to deletion. In [this", "So my question is: how does the community want its mods to handle", "for clarification on, suggest corrections to, and provide meta-information about posts\" and warns", "deleted. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3902/should-my-comment-have-been-deleted), it is suggested that our mods currently delete comments-in-the-answers", "about posts\" and warns that comments are subject to deletion. In [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments)," ]
[ "be flagged, and when we want to delete them. I therefore do not", "the outcome of this question is, it will not be suddenly in effect.", "don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain from", "community consensus** (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have a positive", "around this. * Upvote answers you agree with; downvote answers you disagree with.", "type of comment that you want to keep. Types can be based on", "I therefore do not think that one meta question suffices to establish a", "this outcome is if no answer reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This is", "comments are fine, but you better have very good arguments. ### What this", "rationale, with some examples, why these should be allowed. Define your rationale as", "very good arguments. ### What this is not about Whatever the outcome of", "+ [Should users refrain from answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG", "a single type of comment that you want to keep. Types can be", "single type of comment that you want to keep.** Types can be based", "them to make an informed decision: + [Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151)", "want to delete them. I therefore do not think that one meta question", "how to proceed on a per-case basis. * Do not post a blanket", "of comment that you want to keep. Types can be based on context,", "be allowed. Define your rationale as clearly as possible so we can build", "in the comments? * How do we deal with old answers in comments?", "most of us can get behind. Therefore I will split this process into", "are plenty of collections of general arguments against answers in comments. Please have", "comments, this has to be a community effort. We have to clarify how", "[Should users refrain from answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE.", "moderators handle these flags? * How do we react to users answering in", "not closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some examples, why these should", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4590/7734), if we want to better define our stance on answers in comments,", "not think that one meta question suffices to establish a well-rounded policy on", "clearly as possible so we can build a practical policy around this. ", "answers in comments are fine, but you better have very good arguments. ###", "want to keep.* Types can be based on context, e.g., “comments answering questions", "blanket answer that all answers in comments are fine, but you better have", "is:* Which kinds of answers in comments (if any) do we want to", "one meta question suffices to establish a well-rounded policy on this that most", "about implementation issues such as: * How should answers in comments be flagged?", "it will not be suddenly in effect. We still will have to decide", "so we can build a practical policy around this. * *Upvote answers you", "Such answers will be deleted without warning. The proper way to obtain this", "will not be suddenly in effect. We still will have to decide about", "comments? How do we deal with old answers in comments? While it", "informed decision: + [Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. +", "the first of which is:* Which kinds of answers in comments (if any)", "make an informed decision: + [Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal", "comment that you want to keep.** Types can be based on context, e.g.,", "* How should answers in comments be flagged? * How should moderators handle", "comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. * *Post answers outlining a single type of comment", "this process into multiple questions, the first of which is: Which kinds of", "prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a blanket answer that all answers", "do we deal with old answers in comments? While it is good to", "is not about Whatever the outcome of this question is, it will not", "we react to users answering in the comments? * How do we deal", "in mind when suggesting exceptions, this question is only about setting the goal.", "a blanket answer that all answers in comments are fine, but you better", "we want to better define our stance on answers in comments, this has", "partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. * Post answers outlining a single", "they should be flagged, and when we want to delete them. I therefore", "Post answers outlining a single type of comment that you want to keep.*", "do we want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure There are plenty of", "question is, it will not be suddenly in effect. We still will have", "be flagged? * How should moderators handle these flags? * How do we", "have a positive score, we will decide how to proceed on a per-case", "on RPG SE. * *Post answers outlining a single type of comment that", "at least one of them to make an informed decision: + [Please don't", "write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain from answers", "in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. *Post answers outlining a single type of", "of this question is, it will not be suddenly in effect. We still", "to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a blanket answer that all", "are fine, but you better have very good arguments. ### What this is", "least one of them to make an informed decision: + [Please don't write", "if no answer reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This is to prevent a", "fine, but you better have very good arguments. ### What this is not", "from answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. Post answers", "as answers, how, if, and when they should be flagged, and when we", "least twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be considered community consensus (rule", "Do not post a blanket answer that no answers in comments should be", "reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You", "good to keep such practical concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions, this question", "obtain this outcome is if no answer reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This", "arguments. ### What this is not about Whatever the outcome of this question", "in comments should be accepted. Such answers will be deleted without warning. The", "if, and when they should be flagged, and when we want to delete", "How do we deal with old answers in comments? While it is good", "of general arguments against answers in comments. Please have a look at least", "implementation issues such as: * How should answers in comments be flagged? ", "against answers in comments. Please have a look at least one of them", "to delete them. I therefore do not think that one meta question suffices", "concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions, this question is only about setting the", "clarify how we react to users posting comments as answers, how, if, and", "answer that no answers in comments should be accepted.* Such answers will be", "that were not closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some examples, why", "closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some examples, why these should be", "consensus (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have a positive score,", "a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a blanket answer that all answers in", "about Whatever the outcome of this question is, it will not be suddenly", "answers have a positive score, we will decide how to proceed on a", "twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be considered community consensus (rule stolen", "to obtain this outcome is if no answer reaches the threshold for acceptance.", "answers you agree with; downvote answers you disagree with.** * Answers that have", "at least twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be considered community consensus", "agree with; downvote answers you disagree with.** * *Answers that have a score", "process into multiple questions, the first of which is: Which kinds of answers", "have a score of 5 and at least twice as many upvotes as", "that have a score of 5 and at least twice as many upvotes", "plenty of collections of general arguments against answers in comments. Please have a", "in comments are fine, but you better have very good arguments. ### What", "for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some examples, why these should be allowed.", "Provide a rationale, with some examples, why these should be allowed. Define your", "* *Post answers outlining a single type of comment that you want to", "to make an informed decision: + [Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on", "flagged? How should moderators handle these flags? * How do we react", "rationale as clearly as possible so we can build a practical policy around", "Upvote answers you agree with; downvote answers you disagree with. * *Answers that", "acceptance. (This is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a blanket", " *Answers that have a score of 5 and at least twice as", "with old answers in comments? While it is good to keep such practical", "to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure There are plenty of collections of general", "### Procedure * There are plenty of collections of general arguments against answers", "split this process into multiple questions, the first of which is:* Which kinds", "react to users posting comments as answers, how, if, and when they should", "it is good to keep such practical concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions,", "a rationale, with some examples, why these should be allowed. Define your rationale", "users posting comments as answers, how, if, and when they should be flagged,", "(if any) do we want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure * There are", "on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain from answers (or partial answers) in", "While it is good to keep such practical concerns in mind when suggesting", "old answers in comments? While it is good to keep such practical concerns", "be considered community consensus** (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have", "answers will be deleted without warning. The proper way to obtain this outcome", "be suddenly in effect. We still will have to decide about implementation issues", "when they should be flagged, and when we want to delete them. I", "The proper way to obtain this outcome is if no answer reaches the", "policy on this that most of us can get behind. Therefore I will", "if we want to better define our stance on answers in comments, this", "this is not about Whatever the outcome of this question is, it will", "we want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure * There are plenty of collections", "have a look at least one of them to make an informed decision:", "proper way to obtain this outcome is if no answer reaches the threshold", "we will decide how to proceed on a per-case basis. * *Do not", " Upvote answers you agree with; downvote answers you disagree with. * *Answers", "allowed. Define your rationale as clearly as possible so we can build a", "We have to clarify how we react to users posting comments as answers,", "well-rounded policy on this that most of us can get behind. Therefore I", "which is: Which kinds of answers in comments (if any) do we want", "in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain from answers (or partial", "such as: * How should answers in comments be flagged? * How should", "Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain from answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641)", "of them to make an informed decision: + [Please don't write answers in", "is good to keep such practical concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions, this", "comments be flagged? * How should moderators handle these flags? * How do", "outlining a single type of comment that you want to keep. Types can", "you better have very good arguments. ### What this is not about Whatever", "shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some examples, why these should be allowed. Define", "not be suddenly in effect. We still will have to decide about implementation", "self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a blanket answer that all answers in comments", "blanket answer that no answers in comments should be accepted. Such answers will", "of us can get behind. Therefore I will split this process into multiple", "decision: + [Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should", "outcome of this question is, it will not be suddenly in effect. We", "the threshold for acceptance. (This is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can", "in comments (if any) do we want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure ", "Define your rationale as clearly as possible so we can build a practical", "Therefore I will split this process into multiple questions, the first of which", "them. I therefore do not think that one meta question suffices to establish", "in comments. Please have a look at least one of them to make", "will be considered community consensus* (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers", "were not closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some examples, why these", "establish a well-rounded policy on this that most of us can get behind.", "RPG SE. * Post answers outlining a single type of comment that you", "(rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have a positive score, we", "based on context, e.g., “comments answering questions that were not closed for shopping”.", "keep such practical concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions, this question is only", "for acceptance. (This is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a", "should be accepted. Such answers will be deleted without warning. The proper way", "want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure * There are plenty of collections of", "is, it will not be suddenly in effect. We still will have to", "react to users answering in the comments? * How do we deal with", "warning. The proper way to obtain this outcome is if no answer reaches", "think that one meta question suffices to establish a well-rounded policy on this", "a practical policy around this. * *Upvote answers you agree with; downvote answers", "get behind. Therefore I will split this process into multiple questions, the first", "and when we want to delete them. I therefore do not think that", "good arguments. ### What this is not about Whatever the outcome of this", " How should moderators handle these flags? * How do we react to", "proceed on a per-case basis. * *Do not post a blanket answer that", "“comments answering questions that were not closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with", "comments. Please have a look at least one of them to make an", "Please have a look at least one of them to make an informed", "We still will have to decide about implementation issues such as: How", "answers outlining a single type of comment that you want to keep. Types", "can get behind. Therefore I will split this process into multiple questions, the", "considered community consensus (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have a", "build a practical policy around this. * Upvote answers you agree with; downvote", "not post a blanket answer that no answers in comments should be accepted.", "a blanket answer that no answers in comments should be accepted.** Such answers", "we want to delete them. I therefore do not think that one meta", "on answers in comments, this has to be a community effort. We have", "### What this is not about Whatever the outcome of this question is,", "we can build a practical policy around this. * *Upvote answers you agree", "with some examples, why these should be allowed. Define your rationale as clearly", "can build a practical policy around this. *Upvote answers you agree with;", "to clarify how we react to users posting comments as answers, how, if,", "on a per-case basis. *Do not post a blanket answer that no", "has to be a community effort. We have to clarify how we react", " How do we deal with old answers in comments? While it is", "(This is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a blanket answer", "of answers in comments (if any) do we want to keep? =============================================================== ###", "on this that most of us can get behind. Therefore I will split", "context, e.g., “comments answering questions that were not closed for shopping”. Provide a", "positive score, we will decide how to proceed on a per-case basis. ", "accepted.* Such answers will be deleted without warning. The proper way to obtain", "such practical concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions, this question is only about", "should answers in comments be flagged? * How should moderators handle these flags?", "you disagree with.** * *Answers that have a score of 5 and at", "suddenly in effect. We still will have to decide about implementation issues such", "How should answers in comments be flagged? How should moderators handle these", "*Answers that have a score of 5 and at least twice as many", "and at least twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be considered community", "can be based on context, e.g., “comments answering questions that were not closed", "do we react to users answering in the comments? How do we", "+ [Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users", "any) do we want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure * There are plenty", "As I already said [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4590/7734), if we want to better define our stance", "as: How should answers in comments be flagged? * How should moderators", "into multiple questions, the first of which is:* Which kinds of answers in", "Which kinds of answers in comments (if any) do we want to keep?", "multiple questions, the first of which is:* Which kinds of answers in comments", "to keep such practical concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions, this question is", "I will split this process into multiple questions, the first of which is:", "you want to keep.* Types can be based on context, e.g., “comments answering", "meta question suffices to establish a well-rounded policy on this that most of", "why these should be allowed. Define your rationale as clearly as possible so", "that you want to keep.** Types can be based on context, e.g., “comments", "of which is:* Which kinds of answers in comments (if any) do we", "should be allowed. Define your rationale as clearly as possible so we can", "* How do we react to users answering in the comments? * How", "that most of us can get behind. Therefore I will split this process", "have to clarify how we react to users posting comments as answers, how,", "comments (if any) do we want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure * There", "kinds of answers in comments (if any) do we want to keep? ===============================================================", "answers in comments, this has to be a community effort. We have to", "be a community effort. We have to clarify how we react to users", "one of them to make an informed decision: + [Please don't write answers", "If any other answers have a positive score, we will decide how to", "already said [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4590/7734), if we want to better define our stance on answers", "as possible so we can build a practical policy around this. * *Upvote", "will decide how to proceed on a per-case basis. *Do not post", "effect. We still will have to decide about implementation issues such as: ", "answering questions that were not closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some", "do not think that one meta question suffices to establish a well-rounded policy", "will have to decide about implementation issues such as: * How should answers", "a well-rounded policy on this that most of us can get behind. Therefore", "be accepted.** Such answers will be deleted without warning. The proper way to", "score of 5 and at least twice as many upvotes as downvotes will", "a positive score, we will decide how to proceed on a per-case basis.", "in effect. We still will have to decide about implementation issues such as:", "on context, e.g., “comments answering questions that were not closed for shopping”. Provide", "community effort. We have to clarify how we react to users posting comments", "decide about implementation issues such as: * How should answers in comments be", "answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. * *Post answers outlining", "how, if, and when they should be flagged, and when we want to", "this that most of us can get behind. Therefore I will split this", "suffices to establish a well-rounded policy on this that most of us can", "answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain from answers (or", "to better define our stance on answers in comments, this has to be", "questions, the first of which is: Which kinds of answers in comments (if", "post a blanket answer that no answers in comments should be accepted.** Such", "all answers in comments are fine, but you better have very good arguments.", "users refrain from answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. ", "no answers in comments should be accepted.* Such answers will be deleted without", "questions that were not closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale, with some examples,", "to be a community effort. We have to clarify how we react to", "answer that all answers in comments are fine, but you better have very", "comments as answers, how, if, and when they should be flagged, and when", "flagged, and when we want to delete them. I therefore do not think", "as clearly as possible so we can build a practical policy around this.", "without warning. The proper way to obtain this outcome is if no answer", "as downvotes will be considered community consensus** (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any", "comments? While it is good to keep such practical concerns in mind when", "but you better have very good arguments. ### What this is not about", "this has to be a community effort. We have to clarify how we", "should moderators handle these flags? * How do we react to users answering", "examples, why these should be allowed. Define your rationale as clearly as possible", "we react to users posting comments as answers, how, if, and when they", "Whatever the outcome of this question is, it will not be suddenly in", "[here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have a positive score, we will decide how", "post a blanket answer that all answers in comments are fine, but you", "outcome is if no answer reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This is to", "practical concerns in mind when suggesting exceptions, this question is only about setting", "users answering in the comments? * How do we deal with old answers", "answers in comments. Please have a look at least one of them to", "that all answers in comments are fine, but you better have very good", "look at least one of them to make an informed decision: + [Please", "these flags? * How do we react to users answering in the comments?", "policy around this. * *Upvote answers you agree with; downvote answers you disagree", "any other answers have a positive score, we will decide how to proceed", "way to obtain this outcome is if no answer reaches the threshold for", "have to decide about implementation issues such as: How should answers in", "outcome.) You can post a blanket answer that all answers in comments are", "that no answers in comments should be accepted.** Such answers will be deleted", "practical policy around this. * Upvote answers you agree with; downvote answers you", "these should be allowed. Define your rationale as clearly as possible so we", "and when they should be flagged, and when we want to delete them.", "how we react to users posting comments as answers, how, if, and when", "answers, how, if, and when they should be flagged, and when we want", "keep. Types can be based on context, e.g., “comments answering questions that were", "comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain from answers (or partial answers)", "5 and at least twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be considered", "question suffices to establish a well-rounded policy on this that most of us", "with.** * *Answers that have a score of 5 and at least twice", "other answers have a positive score, we will decide how to proceed on", "basis. Do not post a blanket answer that no answers in comments", "is if no answer reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This is to prevent", "as many upvotes as downvotes will be considered community consensus (rule stolen from", "a look at least one of them to make an informed decision: +", "answering in the comments? * How do we deal with old answers in", "therefore do not think that one meta question suffices to establish a well-rounded", "a per-case basis. * *Do not post a blanket answer that no answers", "first of which is: Which kinds of answers in comments (if any) do", "of collections of general arguments against answers in comments. Please have a look", "answers in comments (if any) do we want to keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure", "e.g., “comments answering questions that were not closed for shopping”. Provide a rationale,", "that one meta question suffices to establish a well-rounded policy on this that", "no answer reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This is to prevent a self-contradictory", "=============================================================== ### Procedure * There are plenty of collections of general arguments against", "collections of general arguments against answers in comments. Please have a look at", "better define our stance on answers in comments, this has to be a", "to users answering in the comments? * How do we deal with old", "us can get behind. Therefore I will split this process into multiple questions,", "a score of 5 and at least twice as many upvotes as downvotes", "this question is, it will not be suddenly in effect. We still will", "should be flagged, and when we want to delete them. I therefore do", "the comments? * How do we deal with old answers in comments? While", "can post a blanket answer that all answers in comments are fine, but", "SE. + [Should users refrain from answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on", "to users posting comments as answers, how, if, and when they should be", "be deleted without warning. The proper way to obtain this outcome is if", "your rationale as clearly as possible so we can build a practical policy", "How should moderators handle these flags? * How do we react to users", "deleted without warning. The proper way to obtain this outcome is if no", "You can post a blanket answer that all answers in comments are fine,", "(or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. * *Post answers outlining a", "an informed decision: + [Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE.", "our stance on answers in comments, this has to be a community effort.", "threshold for acceptance. (This is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post", "of 5 and at least twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be", "decide how to proceed on a per-case basis. Do not post a", "upvotes as downvotes will be considered community consensus (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If", "* *Do not post a blanket answer that no answers in comments should", "answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. *Post answers outlining a single type", "define our stance on answers in comments, this has to be a community", "still will have to decide about implementation issues such as: How should", "better have very good arguments. ### What this is not about Whatever the", "handle these flags? * How do we react to users answering in the", "in comments be flagged? * How should moderators handle these flags? * How", "How do we react to users answering in the comments? * How do", "general arguments against answers in comments. Please have a look at least one", "effort. We have to clarify how we react to users posting comments as", "There are plenty of collections of general arguments against answers in comments. Please", "in comments? While it is good to keep such practical concerns in mind", "will be deleted without warning. The proper way to obtain this outcome is", "will split this process into multiple questions, the first of which is:* Which", "a community effort. We have to clarify how we react to users posting", "to establish a well-rounded policy on this that most of us can get", "behind. Therefore I will split this process into multiple questions, the first of", "many upvotes as downvotes will be considered community consensus (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)).", "in comments, this has to be a community effort. We have to clarify", "said [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4590/7734), if we want to better define our stance on answers in", "delete them. I therefore do not think that one meta question suffices to", "be based on context, e.g., “comments answering questions that were not closed for", "downvote answers you disagree with. * *Answers that have a score of 5", "not about Whatever the outcome of this question is, it will not be", "keep? =============================================================== ### Procedure There are plenty of collections of general arguments", "comments should be accepted.** Such answers will be deleted without warning. The proper", "SE. * *Post answers outlining a single type of comment that you want", "issues such as: How should answers in comments be flagged? * How", "we deal with old answers in comments? While it is good to keep", "stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have a positive score, we will", "posting comments as answers, how, if, and when they should be flagged, and", "disagree with.** * Answers that have a score of 5 and at least", "to keep. Types can be based on context, e.g., “comments answering questions that", "answers in comments should be accepted.** Such answers will be deleted without warning.", "answer reaches the threshold for acceptance. (This is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.)", "deal with old answers in comments? While it is good to keep such", "flags? * How do we react to users answering in the comments? ", "when we want to delete them. I therefore do not think that one", "want to better define our stance on answers in comments, this has to", "to decide about implementation issues such as: How should answers in comments", "answers you disagree with.** * Answers that have a score of 5 and", "you agree with; downvote answers you disagree with. * Answers that have a", "arguments against answers in comments. Please have a look at least one of", "Types can be based on context, e.g., “comments answering questions that were not", "have very good arguments. ### What this is not about Whatever the outcome", "with; downvote answers you disagree with. * Answers that have a score of", "downvotes will be considered community consensus (rule stolen from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other", "answers in comments? While it is good to keep such practical concerns in", "some examples, why these should be allowed. Define your rationale as clearly as", "* There are plenty of collections of general arguments against answers in comments.", "to proceed on a per-case basis. * *Do not post a blanket answer", "is to prevent a self-contradictory outcome.) You can post a blanket answer that", "score, we will decide how to proceed on a per-case basis. *Do", "Procedure There are plenty of collections of general arguments against answers in", "[Please don't write answers in comments](https://interpersonal.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1644/151) on Interpersonal SE. + [Should users refrain", "possible so we can build a practical policy around this. * *Upvote answers", "refrain from answers (or partial answers) in comments?](https://rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/q/6533/7641) on RPG SE. *Post", "I already said [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4590/7734), if we want to better define our stance on", "this. Upvote answers you agree with; downvote answers you disagree with. ", "per-case basis. *Do not post a blanket answer that no answers in", "What this is not about Whatever the outcome of this question is, it", "from [here](https://codegolf.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1061/11354)). If any other answers have a positive score, we will decide", "stance on answers in comments, this has to be a community effort. We", "answers in comments be flagged? How should moderators handle these flags? *" ]
[ "arts subjects such as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and history. > >", "defined in the tag wiki as: > > Questions having to do with", "['liberal arts' tag](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/liberal-arts) is defined in the tag wiki as: > > Questions", "examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to find details on Bachelor degrees majoring", "art, music, philosophy, and history. > > > However, several of the questions", "details on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal arts:", "of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas from an art", "ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should", "* [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated into two tags", "do with liberal arts subjects such as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and", "detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical", "the questions seem to be about liberal arts colleges: * [Research statement for", "* [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) ", "forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated into two tags or otherwise", "typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) [Where to find details on Bachelor degrees", "music, philosophy, and history. > > > However, several of the questions seem", "work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to find details on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas", "an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be", "> However, several of the questions seem to be about liberal arts colleges:", "as: > > Questions having to do with liberal arts subjects such as", "of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to find details on Bachelor degrees majoring in", "on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal arts: ", "tag wiki as: > > Questions having to do with liberal arts subjects", "the quality of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) [Is taking ideas from", "from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this", "wiki as: > > Questions having to do with liberal arts subjects such", "arts college: how much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues)", "[Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated into two tags or", "IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal arts: * [How to judge the quality", "colleges: * [Research statement for liberal arts college: how much detail should I", "arts: * [How to judge the quality of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school)", "in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated into two tags or otherwise cleaned up?", "Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal arts: * [How", "* [How to judge the quality of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) ", "liberal arts college: how much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) [Learning Style", "go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples of \"scholarly", "into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work)", "of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism)", "[What are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to find details on", "However, several of the questions seem to be about liberal arts colleges: ", "languages, art, music, philosophy, and history. > > > However, several of the", "to judge the quality of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) [Is taking", "critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated into", "education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas from an art critic", "are about liberal arts: * [How to judge the quality of education of", "tag](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/liberal-arts) is defined in the tag wiki as: > > Questions having to", "others are about liberal arts: * [How to judge the quality of education", "I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples of", "an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) ", "> > > However, several of the questions seem to be about liberal", "taking ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles)", "judge the quality of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas", "liberal arts: * [How to judge the quality of education of an art", "> > Questions having to do with liberal arts subjects such as literature,", "seem to be about liberal arts colleges: * [Research statement for liberal arts", "about liberal arts: * [How to judge the quality of education of an", "quality of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas from an", "to be about liberal arts colleges: * [Research statement for liberal arts college:", "\"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to find details on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it)", "for liberal arts college: how much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning", "in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal arts: * [How to judge the", "is defined in the tag wiki as: > > Questions having to do", "of the questions seem to be about liberal arts colleges: * [Research statement", "having to do with liberal arts subjects such as literature, languages, art, music,", "the tag wiki as: > > Questions having to do with liberal arts", "subjects such as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and history. > > >", "school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms", "> Questions having to do with liberal arts subjects such as literature, languages,", "arts colleges: * [Research statement for liberal arts college: how much detail should", "liberal arts subjects such as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and history. >", "* [What are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to find details", "Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to", "should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples", "> > However, several of the questions seem to be about liberal arts", "be about liberal arts colleges: * [Research statement for liberal arts college: how", "college: how much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) ", "much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are", "Questions having to do with liberal arts subjects such as literature, languages, art,", "liberal arts colleges: * [Research statement for liberal arts college: how much detail", "The small ['liberal arts' tag](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/liberal-arts) is defined in the tag wiki as: >", "in the tag wiki as: > > Questions having to do with liberal", "* [Where to find details on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others", "(let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated into two tags or otherwise cleaned", "majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal arts: * [How to judge", "how much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) * [Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What", "about liberal arts colleges: * [Research statement for liberal arts college: how much", "[Where to find details on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are", "art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated", "as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and history. > > > However, several", "philosophy, and history. > > > However, several of the questions seem to", "to find details on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about", "* [Is taking ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...)", "to do with liberal arts subjects such as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy,", "history. > > > However, several of the questions seem to be about", "with liberal arts subjects such as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and history.", "and history. > > > However, several of the questions seem to be", "* [Research statement for liberal arts college: how much detail should I go", "several of the questions seem to be about liberal arts colleges: * [Research", "Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to find", "[Research statement for liberal arts college: how much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into)", "plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...) in articles](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/127932/colloquial-forms-lets-in-articles) Should this be separated into two", "small ['liberal arts' tag](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/liberal-arts) is defined in the tag wiki as: > >", "degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal arts: * [How to", "are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where to find details on Bachelor", "[Is taking ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial forms (let's...) in", "[How to judge the quality of education of an art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is", "find details on Bachelor degrees majoring in IT?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/119554/where-to-find-details-on-bachelor-degrees-majoring-in-it) Whereas others are about liberal", "arts' tag](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/liberal-arts) is defined in the tag wiki as: > > Questions having", "literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and history. > > > However, several of", "such as literature, languages, art, music, philosophy, and history. > > > However,", "art school?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/107034/how-to-judge-the-quality-of-education-of-an-art-school) * [Is taking ideas from an art critic plagiarism?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/82185/is-taking-ideas-from-an-art-critic-plagiarism) * [Colloquial", "questions seem to be about liberal arts colleges: * [Research statement for liberal", "Whereas others are about liberal arts: * [How to judge the quality of", "[Learning Style Issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98816/learning-style-issues) * [What are typical examples of \"scholarly work\"?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138194/what-are-typical-examples-of-scholarly-work) * [Where", "statement for liberal arts college: how much detail should I go into?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57560/research-statement-for-liberal-arts-college-how-much-detail-should-i-go-into) *" ]
[ "[What does the Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog", "objection is on religious, grammatical, or thought police grounds, or any other argument.", "ice regardless of if your objection is on religious, grammatical, or thought police", "gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition to", "The SE [Code of Conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) has been changed in regards to the use", "the Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The", "the use of pronouns when referring to users. There is a fair amount", "be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns", "that if you are trying to avoid a user's pronouns, then you are", "changes. Based on these discussions it seems SE's take on the situation is", "fair amount of discussion at MSE [What does the Code of Conduct say", "and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed up as \"Prefer", "addition to the public discussion, there are also private discussion about how to", "been changed in regards to the use of pronouns when referring to users.", "to the public discussion, there are also private discussion about how to enforce", "\"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition to the public discussion, there are", "pronouns when referring to users. There is a fair amount of discussion at", "SE [Code of Conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) has been changed in regards to the use of", "of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can", "take on the situation is that if you are trying to avoid a", "summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when", "then you are on thin ice regardless of if your objection is on", "about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed up", "can be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated", "a fair amount of discussion at MSE [What does the Code of Conduct", "Conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) has been changed in regards to the use of pronouns when referring", "the situation is that if you are trying to avoid a user's pronouns,", "pronouns (when known)\". In addition to the public discussion, there are also private", "the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language", "discussion, there are also private discussion about how to enforce these changes. Based", "a user's pronouns, then you are on thin ice regardless of if your", "your objection is on religious, grammatical, or thought police grounds, or any other", "about how to enforce these changes. Based on these discussions it seems SE's", "discussion at MSE [What does the Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and", "use of pronouns when referring to users. There is a fair amount of", "changes can be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use", "Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be", "Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes", "there are also private discussion about how to enforce these changes. Based on", "There is a fair amount of discussion at MSE [What does the Code", "also private discussion about how to enforce these changes. Based on these discussions", "it seems SE's take on the situation is that if you are trying", "in regards to the use of pronouns when referring to users. There is", "referring to users. There is a fair amount of discussion at MSE [What", "are trying to avoid a user's pronouns, then you are on thin ice", "at MSE [What does the Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on", "[Code of Conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) has been changed in regards to the use of pronouns", "pronouns, then you are on thin ice regardless of if your objection is", "to enforce these changes. Based on these discussions it seems SE's take on", "Based on these discussions it seems SE's take on the situation is that", "these changes. Based on these discussions it seems SE's take on the situation", "enforce these changes. Based on these discussions it seems SE's take on the", "thin ice regardless of if your objection is on religious, grammatical, or thought", "blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when", "known)\". In addition to the public discussion, there are also private discussion about", "<https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\"", "language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition to the", "regardless of if your objection is on religious, grammatical, or thought police grounds,", "when referring to users. There is a fair amount of discussion at MSE", "has been changed in regards to the use of pronouns when referring to", "SE's take on the situation is that if you are trying to avoid", "\"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition", "users. There is a fair amount of discussion at MSE [What does the", "the public discussion, there are also private discussion about how to enforce these", "MSE [What does the Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the", "when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition to the public", "situation is that if you are trying to avoid a user's pronouns, then", "on these discussions it seems SE's take on the situation is that if", "regards to the use of pronouns when referring to users. There is a", "on thin ice regardless of if your objection is on religious, grammatical, or", "public discussion, there are also private discussion about how to enforce these changes.", "pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed up as", "of Conduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) has been changed in regards to the use of pronouns when", "seems SE's take on the situation is that if you are trying to", "amount of discussion at MSE [What does the Code of Conduct say about", "is a fair amount of discussion at MSE [What does the Code of", "of pronouns when referring to users. There is a fair amount of discussion", "uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition to the public discussion,", "is that if you are trying to avoid a user's pronouns, then you", "if you are trying to avoid a user's pronouns, then you are on", "private discussion about how to enforce these changes. Based on these discussions it", "these discussions it seems SE's take on the situation is that if you", "you are on thin ice regardless of if your objection is on religious,", "to avoid a user's pronouns, then you are on thin ice regardless of", "(when known)\". In addition to the public discussion, there are also private discussion", "avoid a user's pronouns, then you are on thin ice regardless of if", "trying to avoid a user's pronouns, then you are on thin ice regardless", "of if your objection is on religious, grammatical, or thought police grounds, or", "if your objection is on religious, grammatical, or thought police grounds, or any", "The changes can be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and", "stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition to the public discussion, there are also", "In addition to the public discussion, there are also private discussion about how", "are also private discussion about how to enforce these changes. Based on these", "on the situation is that if you are trying to avoid a user's", "does the Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>.", "as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In", "of discussion at MSE [What does the Code of Conduct say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns)", "and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\". In addition to the public discussion, there", "you are trying to avoid a user's pronouns, then you are on thin", "user's pronouns, then you are on thin ice regardless of if your objection", "to users. There is a fair amount of discussion at MSE [What does", "on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed up as \"Prefer gender-neutral", "say about pronouns?](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/336364/what-does-the-code-of-conduct-say-about-pronouns) and on the blog <https://stackoverflow.blog/2019/10/10/iterating-on-inclusion/>. The changes can be summed", "discussions it seems SE's take on the situation is that if you are", "are on thin ice regardless of if your objection is on religious, grammatical,", "how to enforce these changes. Based on these discussions it seems SE's take", "changed in regards to the use of pronouns when referring to users. There", "to the use of pronouns when referring to users. There is a fair", "up as \"Prefer gender-neutral language when uncertain\" and \"Use stated pronouns (when known)\".", "discussion about how to enforce these changes. Based on these discussions it seems" ]
[ "former moderators) about to what extent gendered pronouns and more generally language is", "for people on Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough idea about how many", "will skyrocket with the new CoC, but that also might be interesting to", "to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or former moderators) about to what", "any data/rough idea about how many users of this site state preferred pronouns?", "[The code of conduct has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to what", "know.) The reason I ask is that I wonder how much of a", "to what extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern for people on Academia.SE. Do", "on our site. In the event we have no data, I would be", "that [The code of conduct has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to", "moderators) about to what extent gendered pronouns and more generally language is an", "(Maybe the percentage of such users will skyrocket with the new CoC, but", "users will skyrocket with the new CoC, but that also might be interesting", "Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough idea about how many users of this", "I found myself wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern for", "about to what extent gendered pronouns and more generally language is an issue", "have any data/rough idea about how many users of this site state preferred", "many users of this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such", "(preferably from current or former moderators) about to what extent gendered pronouns and", "users of this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such users", "but that also might be interesting to know.) The reason I ask is", "anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or former moderators) about to what extent gendered", "pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such users will skyrocket with the new CoC,", "has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns are", "extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern for people on Academia.SE. Do we have", "Now that [The code of conduct has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering", "been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns are a", "are a concern for people on Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough idea", "we have any data/rough idea about how many users of this site state", "on Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough idea about how many users of", "The reason I ask is that I wonder how much of a concern", "evidence (preferably from current or former moderators) about to what extent gendered pronouns", "changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern", "of conduct has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to what extent non/gendered", "current or former moderators) about to what extent gendered pronouns and more generally", "code of conduct has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to what extent", "is on our site. In the event we have no data, I would", "Do we have any data/rough idea about how many users of this site", "site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such users will skyrocket with", "myself wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern for people on", "of this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such users will", "wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern for people on Academia.SE.", "extent gendered pronouns and more generally language is an issue for our users.", "might be interesting to know.) The reason I ask is that I wonder", "a concern pronoun usage is on our site. In the event we have", "the percentage of such users will skyrocket with the new CoC, but that", "is that I wonder how much of a concern pronoun usage is on", "CoC, but that also might be interesting to know.) The reason I ask", "pronoun usage is on our site. In the event we have no data,", "ask is that I wonder how much of a concern pronoun usage is", "the event we have no data, I would be happy to hear anecdotal", "state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such users will skyrocket with the", "happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or former moderators) about to", "non/gendered pronouns are a concern for people on Academia.SE. Do we have any", "such users will skyrocket with the new CoC, but that also might be", "what extent gendered pronouns and more generally language is an issue for our", "be interesting to know.) The reason I ask is that I wonder how", "hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or former moderators) about to what extent", "from current or former moderators) about to what extent gendered pronouns and more", "how many users of this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of", "In the event we have no data, I would be happy to hear", "have no data, I would be happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from", "wonder how much of a concern pronoun usage is on our site. In", "to what extent gendered pronouns and more generally language is an issue for", "concern pronoun usage is on our site. In the event we have no", "to know.) The reason I ask is that I wonder how much of", "of such users will skyrocket with the new CoC, but that also might", "our site. In the event we have no data, I would be happy", "new CoC, but that also might be interesting to know.) The reason I", "concern for people on Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough idea about how", "I ask is that I wonder how much of a concern pronoun usage", "about how many users of this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage", "with the new CoC, but that also might be interesting to know.) The", "no data, I would be happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current", "preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such users will skyrocket with the new", "site. In the event we have no data, I would be happy to", "event we have no data, I would be happy to hear anecdotal evidence", "found myself wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern for people", "or former moderators) about to what extent gendered pronouns and more generally language", "data/rough idea about how many users of this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe", "idea about how many users of this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the", "conduct has been changed](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4607/19607), I found myself wondering to what extent non/gendered pronouns", "that I wonder how much of a concern pronoun usage is on our", "a concern for people on Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough idea about", "much of a concern pronoun usage is on our site. In the event", "people on Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough idea about how many users", "data, I would be happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or", "what extent non/gendered pronouns are a concern for people on Academia.SE. Do we", "this site state preferred pronouns? (Maybe the percentage of such users will skyrocket", "we have no data, I would be happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably", "of a concern pronoun usage is on our site. In the event we", "I would be happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or former", "that also might be interesting to know.) The reason I ask is that", "reason I ask is that I wonder how much of a concern pronoun", "pronouns are a concern for people on Academia.SE. Do we have any data/rough", "skyrocket with the new CoC, but that also might be interesting to know.)", "be happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or former moderators) about", "how much of a concern pronoun usage is on our site. In the", "usage is on our site. In the event we have no data, I", "would be happy to hear anecdotal evidence (preferably from current or former moderators)", "interesting to know.) The reason I ask is that I wonder how much", "also might be interesting to know.) The reason I ask is that I", "percentage of such users will skyrocket with the new CoC, but that also", "the new CoC, but that also might be interesting to know.) The reason", "I wonder how much of a concern pronoun usage is on our site." ]
[ "this question, but don't want to get into an edit war, and the", "out of the ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary > > > fantastic,", "ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > > >", "puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous,", "moment both protected and close to closure: [Is it bizarre that a professor", "occurs. Should I have just toned it down by an edit? --- The", "> freakish > > outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives", "queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary, out of the", "of the ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable,", "[Is it bizarre that a professor asks every student for a 3 inch", "eccentric > > flaky > > freakish > > outlandish disapproving > >", "it down by an edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms:", "out how unusual is the request or how widespread this type of thing", "closure: [Is it bizarre that a professor asks every student for a 3", "odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical,", "the ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling,", "> Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious,", "unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary, out of", "> outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > >", "of this question, but don't want to get into an edit war, and", "dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > > eccentric > > flaky > > freakish", "> > > --- So even the dictionaries have different views of the", "in my view. Perhaps the question wanted to find out how unusual is", "dialogue or response in my view. Perhaps the question wanted to find out", "> > freakish > > outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre)", "> eccentric > > flaky > > freakish > > outlandish disapproving >", "get into an edit war, and the question is at the moment both", "is at the moment both protected and close to closure: [Is it bizarre", "The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > > eccentric > > flaky", "edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > > eccentric >", "freakish, surreal > > > outré > > > --- So even the", "to find out how unusual is the request or how widespread this type", "the title of this question, but don't want to get into an edit", "I have just toned it down by an edit? --- The [Cambridge English", "these synonyms: > > eccentric > > flaky > > freakish > >", "by a staff member bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue or response in", "for a 3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a", "irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal >", "gives these synonyms: > > eccentric > > flaky > > freakish >", "disapproving > > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange, peculiar,", "to get into an edit war, and the question is at the moment", "an edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > > eccentric", "sensible dialogue or response in my view. Perhaps the question wanted to find", "baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque,", "precludes a sensible dialogue or response in my view. Perhaps the question wanted", "freak, freakish, surreal > > > outré > > > --- So even", "view. Perhaps the question wanted to find out how unusual is the request", "thing occurs. Should I have just toned it down by an edit? ---", "widespread this type of thing occurs. Should I have just toned it down", "aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > > > outré > > > ---", "an edit war, and the question is at the moment both protected and", "and the question is at the moment both protected and close to closure:", "Calling any action by a staff member bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue", "> > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange, peculiar, odd,", "edit war, and the question is at the moment both protected and close", "mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll,", "> > outré > > > --- So even the dictionaries have different", "action by a staff member bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue or response", "but don't want to get into an edit war, and the question is", "comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > > > outré", "any action by a staff member bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue or", "how unusual is the request or how widespread this type of thing occurs.", "don't want to get into an edit war, and the question is at", "at the moment both protected and close to closure: [Is it bizarre that", "to closure: [Is it bizarre that a professor asks every student for a", "wanted to find out how unusual is the request or how widespread this", "> > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular,", "English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > > eccentric > > flaky > >", "> > --- So even the dictionaries have different views of the power", "> > strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer,", "inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a staff member bizarre", "how widespread this type of thing occurs. Should I have just toned it", "down by an edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: >", "both protected and close to closure: [Is it bizarre that a professor asks", "type of thing occurs. Should I have just toned it down by an", "> > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous,", "my view. Perhaps the question wanted to find out how unusual is the", "way, extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable,", "a staff member bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue or response in my", "find myself uncomfortable with the title of this question, but don't want to", "the question is at the moment both protected and close to closure: [Is", "unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary, out of the way,", "remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical,", "and close to closure: [Is it bizarre that a professor asks every student", "singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > >", "inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a staff member bizarre just precludes a", "find out how unusual is the request or how widespread this type of", "question, but don't want to get into an edit war, and the question", "unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak,", "a professor asks every student for a 3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr)", "> outré > > > --- So even the dictionaries have different views", "toned it down by an edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these", "close to closure: [Is it bizarre that a professor asks every student for", "with the title of this question, but don't want to get into an", "> > outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: >", "> --- So even the dictionaries have different views of the power of", "> fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular,", "curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out", "So even the dictionaries have different views of the power of the word!", "the question wanted to find out how unusual is the request or how", "title of this question, but don't want to get into an edit war,", "professor asks every student for a 3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling", "unusual is the request or how widespread this type of thing occurs. Should", "photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a staff member bizarre just precludes a sensible", "just toned it down by an edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives", "[Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > > eccentric > > flaky >", "inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish,", "member bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue or response in my view. Perhaps", "grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > > > outré > > > --- So", "a sensible dialogue or response in my view. Perhaps the question wanted to", "Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric,", "by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a staff member bizarre just", "unusual, out of the ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary > > >", "it bizarre that a professor asks every student for a 3 inch by", "bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue or response in my view. Perhaps the", "by an edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > >", "unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary", "atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary > >", "want to get into an edit war, and the question is at the", "asks every student for a 3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any", "or response in my view. Perhaps the question wanted to find out how", "fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous,", "the way, extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling,", "myself uncomfortable with the title of this question, but don't want to get", "gives these: > > strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional,", "mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant,", "have just toned it down by an edit? --- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre)", "synonyms: > > eccentric > > flaky > > freakish > > outlandish", "droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > > > outré > >", "of thing occurs. Should I have just toned it down by an edit?", "Perhaps the question wanted to find out how unusual is the request or", "staff member bizarre just precludes a sensible dialogue or response in my view.", "every student for a 3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action", "ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying,", "outré > > > --- So even the dictionaries have different views of", "funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual,", "into an edit war, and the question is at the moment both protected", "incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal", "5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a staff member bizarre just precludes", "question is at the moment both protected and close to closure: [Is it", "outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the", "or how widespread this type of thing occurs. Should I have just toned", "of the way, extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing,", "ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > > > outré >", "abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary, out of the way, extraordinary >", "--- So even the dictionaries have different views of the power of the", "> strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected,", "just precludes a sensible dialogue or response in my view. Perhaps the question", "that a professor asks every student for a 3 inch by 5 inch", "a 3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a staff", "--- The [Cambridge English dictionary](https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/bizarre) gives these synonyms: > > eccentric > >", "perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable, incongruous, irregular, singular, ludicrous, comical, ridiculous, droll, deviant, aberrant,", "question wanted to find out how unusual is the request or how widespread", "> flaky > > freakish > > outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas", "war, and the question is at the moment both protected and close to", "the request or how widespread this type of thing occurs. Should I have", "unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary, out", "Should I have just toned it down by an edit? --- The [Cambridge", "> > flaky > > freakish > > outlandish disapproving > > >", "I find myself uncomfortable with the title of this question, but don't want", "deviant, aberrant, grotesque, freak, freakish, surreal > > > outré > > >", "eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of the ordinary,", "extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious, perplexing, baffling, unaccountable, inexplicable,", "peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal,", "out of the way, extraordinary > > > fantastic, remarkable, puzzling, mystifying, mysterious,", "freakish > > outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these:", "surreal > > > outré > > > --- So even the dictionaries", "[the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish,", "outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange,", "> > Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange, peculiar, odd, funny,", "Whereas [the Oxford](https://www.lexico.com/en/synonym/bizarre) gives these: > > strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat,", "strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar,", "is the request or how widespread this type of thing occurs. Should I", "flaky > > freakish > > outlandish disapproving > > > Whereas [the", "this type of thing occurs. Should I have just toned it down by", "protected and close to closure: [Is it bizarre that a professor asks every", "3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by a staff member", "the moment both protected and close to closure: [Is it bizarre that a", "offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox, queer, unexpected, unfamiliar, abnormal, atypical, unusual, out of", "> > > outré > > > --- So even the dictionaries have", "response in my view. Perhaps the question wanted to find out how unusual", "student for a 3 inch by 5 inch photograph?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138732/is-it-bizarre-that-a-professor-asks-every-student-for-a-3-inch-by-5-inch-photogr) Calling any action by", "bizarre that a professor asks every student for a 3 inch by 5", "these: > > strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, offbeat, outlandish, eccentric, unconventional, unorthodox,", "uncomfortable with the title of this question, but don't want to get into", "> > eccentric > > flaky > > freakish > > outlandish disapproving", "request or how widespread this type of thing occurs. Should I have just" ]
[ "in detail before deciding to write my own question. Furthermore, I revised my", "deals with possessing two PhDs at once, the very notion of which seems", "\"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to close the question. So", "experience to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question did", "provided a great answer (which I accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking for", "found the experience to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my", "and taking action to close the question. So my meta-question is: how can", "to trigger many academics. I suspect that many of the closers did not", "I found the experience to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered", "the experience to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question", "(which I accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking for further attention. It just", "to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question did not,", "the issue is that my question deals with possessing two PhDs at once,", "at once, the very notion of which seems to trigger many academics. I", "my own question. Furthermore, I revised my question multiple times to make the", "notion of which seems to trigger many academics. I suspect that many of", "I wonder if part of the issue is that my question deals with", "fact read that post in detail before deciding to write my own question.", "post in detail before deciding to write my own question. Furthermore, I revised", "had a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as a duplicate. I found the experience", "academics. I suspect that many of the closers did not actually read the", "time ago, I had a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as a duplicate. I", "Some time ago, I had a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as a duplicate.", "actually read the question or its revisions in detail, instead defaulting to the", "marked as a duplicate. I found the experience to be quite bizarre-- [the", "the question. So my meta-question is: how can I get the \"duplicate\" notice", "that post in detail before deciding to write my own question. Furthermore, I", "closed and marked as a duplicate. I found the experience to be quite", "own question. Furthermore, I revised my question multiple times to make the differences", "So my meta-question is: how can I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from", "read that post in detail before deciding to write my own question. Furthermore,", "remain, as it undermines what I think is a distinct and real issue", "not actually read the question or its revisions in detail, instead defaulting to", "which seems to trigger many academics. I suspect that many of the closers", "to write my own question. Furthermore, I revised my question multiple times to", "revisions in detail, instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and", "defaulting to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to close", "bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question did not, from my view--", "duplicate. I found the experience to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed", "before deciding to write my own question. Furthermore, I revised my question multiple", "my question multiple times to make the differences clearer. I wonder if part", "a great answer (which I accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking for further", "view-- I had in fact read that post in detail before deciding to", "further attention. It just feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as", "two PhDs at once, the very notion of which seems to trigger many", "quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question did not, from my", "I suspect that many of the closers did not actually read the question", "seems to trigger many academics. I suspect that many of the closers did", "the closers did not actually read the question or its revisions in detail,", "be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question did not, from", "make the differences clearer. I wonder if part of the issue is that", "differences clearer. I wonder if part of the issue is that my question", "can I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my question? Someone already provided", "I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my question? Someone already provided a", "claimed answered my question did not, from my view-- I had in fact", "question. Furthermore, I revised my question multiple times to make the differences clearer.", "issue is that my question deals with possessing two PhDs at once, the", "PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to close the question. So my", "or its revisions in detail, instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\"", "if part of the issue is that my question deals with possessing two", "in detail, instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking", "looking for further attention. It just feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to", "just feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it undermines what", "question deals with possessing two PhDs at once, the very notion of which", "great answer (which I accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking for further attention.", "question? Someone already provided a great answer (which I accepted), so I'm not", "it undermines what I think is a distinct and real issue for many", "close the question. So my meta-question is: how can I get the \"duplicate\"", "closers did not actually read the question or its revisions in detail, instead", "is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to close the question. So my meta-question", "\"duplicate\" notice removed from my question? Someone already provided a great answer (which", "many academics. I suspect that many of the closers did not actually read", "read the question or its revisions in detail, instead defaulting to the \"two", "the very notion of which seems to trigger many academics. I suspect that", "Someone already provided a great answer (which I accepted), so I'm not necessarily", "my question deals with possessing two PhDs at once, the very notion of", "possessing two PhDs at once, the very notion of which seems to trigger", "had in fact read that post in detail before deciding to write my", "write my own question. Furthermore, I revised my question multiple times to make", "deciding to write my own question. Furthermore, I revised my question multiple times", "Furthermore, I revised my question multiple times to make the differences clearer. I", "question. So my meta-question is: how can I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed", "question did not, from my view-- I had in fact read that post", "is: how can I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my question? Someone", "from my view-- I had in fact read that post in detail before", "the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to close the question.", "did not, from my view-- I had in fact read that post in", "accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking for further attention. It just feels silly", "removed from my question? Someone already provided a great answer (which I accepted),", "with possessing two PhDs at once, the very notion of which seems to", "detail before deciding to write my own question. Furthermore, I revised my question", "I accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking for further attention. It just feels", "attention. It just feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it", "to close the question. So my meta-question is: how can I get the", "bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to close the question. So my meta-question is:", "for further attention. It just feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain,", "feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it undermines what I", "as it undermines what I think is a distinct and real issue for", "suspect that many of the closers did not actually read the question or", "already provided a great answer (which I accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking", "revised my question multiple times to make the differences clearer. I wonder if", "not necessarily looking for further attention. It just feels silly for the \"duplicate\"", "that my question deals with possessing two PhDs at once, the very notion", "ago, I had a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as a duplicate. I found", "my view-- I had in fact read that post in detail before deciding", "answer (which I accepted), so I'm not necessarily looking for further attention. It", "marker to remain, as it undermines what I think is a distinct and", "I had a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as a duplicate. I found the", "clearer. I wonder if part of the issue is that my question deals", "once, the very notion of which seems to trigger many academics. I suspect", "as a duplicate. I found the experience to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path)", "many of the closers did not actually read the question or its revisions", "that many of the closers did not actually read the question or its", "to make the differences clearer. I wonder if part of the issue is", "of the issue is that my question deals with possessing two PhDs at", "It just feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it undermines", "to remain, as it undermines what I think is a distinct and real", "I revised my question multiple times to make the differences clearer. I wonder", "part of the issue is that my question deals with possessing two PhDs", "to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to close the", "I'm not necessarily looking for further attention. It just feels silly for the", "detail, instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action", "the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my question? Someone already provided a great answer", "its revisions in detail, instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion", "times to make the differences clearer. I wonder if part of the issue", "for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it undermines what I think is", "PhDs at once, the very notion of which seems to trigger many academics.", "a [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as a duplicate. I found the experience to", "question or its revisions in detail, instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs is", "in fact read that post in detail before deciding to write my own", "question multiple times to make the differences clearer. I wonder if part of", "notice removed from my question? Someone already provided a great answer (which I", "so I'm not necessarily looking for further attention. It just feels silly for", "not, from my view-- I had in fact read that post in detail", "my question did not, from my view-- I had in fact read that", "wonder if part of the issue is that my question deals with possessing", "[the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question did not, from my view-- I", "did not actually read the question or its revisions in detail, instead defaulting", "my meta-question is: how can I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my", "taking action to close the question. So my meta-question is: how can I", "trigger many academics. I suspect that many of the closers did not actually", "multiple times to make the differences clearer. I wonder if part of the", "silly for the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it undermines what I think", "get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my question? Someone already provided a great", "post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many claimed answered my question did not, from my view-- I had", "very notion of which seems to trigger many academics. I suspect that many", "is that my question deals with possessing two PhDs at once, the very", "from my question? Someone already provided a great answer (which I accepted), so", "and marked as a duplicate. I found the experience to be quite bizarre--", "[question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/138935/what-to-expect-when-pursuing-a-second-doctorate-in-an-unrelated-field) closed and marked as a duplicate. I found the experience to be", "the question or its revisions in detail, instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs", "instead defaulting to the \"two PhDs is bad/sad/mad\" opinion and taking action to", "how can I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my question? Someone already", "I had in fact read that post in detail before deciding to write", "a duplicate. I found the experience to be quite bizarre-- [the post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/17232/is-doing-two-phds-a-good-path) many", "the \"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it undermines what I think is a", "action to close the question. So my meta-question is: how can I get", "\"duplicate\" marker to remain, as it undermines what I think is a distinct", "the differences clearer. I wonder if part of the issue is that my", "many claimed answered my question did not, from my view-- I had in", "undermines what I think is a distinct and real issue for many people.", "meta-question is: how can I get the \"duplicate\" notice removed from my question?", "answered my question did not, from my view-- I had in fact read", "of which seems to trigger many academics. I suspect that many of the", "my question? Someone already provided a great answer (which I accepted), so I'm", "of the closers did not actually read the question or its revisions in", "necessarily looking for further attention. It just feels silly for the \"duplicate\" marker", "opinion and taking action to close the question. So my meta-question is: how" ]
[ "non-apology apology, are a bit over the top. > > > I encourage", "the official SE response, I'm going to temporarily suspend my mod activities as", "should react to these new changes on SE, are we somehow affected? are", "combined with the terrible handling of the actual firing, combined with the non-apology", "as well. The disrespect being shown to a well-respected volunteer simply trying to", "a well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand what is going on, combined with", "volunteer simply trying to understand what is going on, combined with the terrible", "in their community. Another one wrote A request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms)", "react to these new changes on SE, are we somehow affected? are our", "that big troubles are coming, now I understand on what she implied, however,", "was very nice and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I read it seems", "reading the official SE response, I'm going to temporarily suspend my mod activities", "nice and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I read it seems like moderators", "the start of this year that something is going wrong, however they proceed", "now I understand on what she implied, however, if you all knew that", "moderators kept us in dark? We as ordinary users how should react to", "mod on Academia.SE. After reading the official SE response, I'm going to temporarily", "with the non-apology apology, are a bit over the top. > > >", "proceed with election for new moderators. When I asked one user why she", "position, she told me that big troubles are coming, now I understand on", "bit over the top. > > > I encourage The Powers That Be™", "activities as well. The disrespect being shown to a well-respected volunteer simply trying", "activities commented or implied that they will come back, so what is the", "new changes on SE, are we somehow affected? are our identities and location", "Powers That Be™ to reconsider all their actions here, and think deeply about", "she implied, however, if you all knew that why moderators kept us in", "Academia.SE. After reading the official SE response, I'm going to temporarily suspend my", "actual firing, combined with the non-apology apology, are a bit over the top.", "Everything I read it seems like moderators knew from the start of this", "affected? are our identities and location sold to third parties now? Also moderators", "somehow affected? are our identities and location sold to third parties now? Also", "shown to a well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand what is going on,", "something is going wrong, however they proceed with election for new moderators. When", "official SE response, I'm going to temporarily suspend my mod activities as well.", "on Academia.SE. After reading the official SE response, I'm going to temporarily suspend", "they want to encourage in their community. Another one wrote A request for", "to encourage in their community. Another one wrote A request for [SE employees", "behavior they want to encourage in their community. Another one wrote A request", "than? We as the users are confused and would like to know more", "for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very", "wonder what happened. Everything I read it seems like moderators knew from the", "come back, so what is the issue than? We as the users are", "identities and location sold to third parties now? Also moderators that suspend their", "us in dark? We as ordinary users how should react to these new", "new moderators. When I asked one user why she didn't apply for a", "request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was", "The disrespect being shown to a well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand what", "simply trying to understand what is going on, combined with the terrible handling", "understand what is going on, combined with the terrible handling of the actual", "that something is going wrong, however they proceed with election for new moderators.", "implied that they will come back, so what is the issue than? We", "I'm going to temporarily suspend my mod activities as well. The disrespect being", "suspend my mod activities as well. The disrespect being shown to a well-respected", "the terrible handling of the actual firing, combined with the non-apology apology, are", "however, if you all knew that why moderators kept us in dark? We", "over the top. > > > I encourage The Powers That Be™ to", "location sold to third parties now? Also moderators that suspend their activities commented", "all knew that why moderators kept us in dark? We as ordinary users", "like moderators knew from the start of this year that something is going", "however they proceed with election for new moderators. When I asked one user", "for a position, she told me that big troubles are coming, now I", "I asked one user why she didn't apply for a position, she told", "> > > I encourage The Powers That Be™ to reconsider all their", "what happened. Everything I read it seems like moderators knew from the start", "wrong, however they proceed with election for new moderators. When I asked one", "for new moderators. When I asked one user why she didn't apply for", "commented or implied that they will come back, so what is the issue", "one user why she didn't apply for a position, she told me that", "this year that something is going wrong, however they proceed with election for", "that suspend their activities commented or implied that they will come back, so", "knew that why moderators kept us in dark? We as ordinary users how", "handling of the actual firing, combined with the non-apology apology, are a bit", "year that something is going wrong, however they proceed with election for new", "and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I read it seems like moderators knew", "When I asked one user why she didn't apply for a position, she", "my mod activities as well. The disrespect being shown to a well-respected volunteer", "One moderator suspended [activity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper/334390#334390) > > 'm a mod on Academia.SE. After reading", "and think deeply about the types of behavior they want to encourage in", "me that big troubles are coming, now I understand on what she implied,", "the non-apology apology, are a bit over the top. > > > I", "[suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I", "going on, combined with the terrible handling of the actual firing, combined with", "all their actions here, and think deeply about the types of behavior they", "encourage The Powers That Be™ to reconsider all their actions here, and think", "wrote A request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That", "if you all knew that why moderators kept us in dark? We as", "as the users are confused and would like to know more about the", "with the terrible handling of the actual firing, combined with the non-apology apology,", "employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice and", "apology, are a bit over the top. > > > I encourage The", "she didn't apply for a position, she told me that big troubles are", "the top. > > > I encourage The Powers That Be™ to reconsider", "apply for a position, she told me that big troubles are coming, now", "sold to third parties now? Also moderators that suspend their activities commented or", "of behavior they want to encourage in their community. Another one wrote A", "want to encourage in their community. Another one wrote A request for [SE", "what she implied, however, if you all knew that why moderators kept us", "insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I read it seems like moderators knew from", "from the start of this year that something is going wrong, however they", "the users are confused and would like to know more about the situation.", "A request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user", "I read it seems like moderators knew from the start of this year", "so what is the issue than? We as the users are confused and", "is the issue than? We as the users are confused and would like", "what is the issue than? We as the users are confused and would", "with election for new moderators. When I asked one user why she didn't", "is going on, combined with the terrible handling of the actual firing, combined", "the issue than? We as the users are confused and would like to", "the types of behavior they want to encourage in their community. Another one", "deeply about the types of behavior they want to encourage in their community.", "are we somehow affected? are our identities and location sold to third parties", "are coming, now I understand on what she implied, however, if you all", "disrespect being shown to a well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand what is", "seems like moderators knew from the start of this year that something is", "users how should react to these new changes on SE, are we somehow", "was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything", "suspended [activity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper/334390#334390) > > 'm a mod on Academia.SE. After reading the official", "encourage in their community. Another one wrote A request for [SE employees and", "these new changes on SE, are we somehow affected? are our identities and", "their activities commented or implied that they will come back, so what is", "dark? We as ordinary users how should react to these new changes on", "> 'm a mod on Academia.SE. After reading the official SE response, I'm", "> > 'm a mod on Academia.SE. After reading the official SE response,", "suspend their activities commented or implied that they will come back, so what", "are a bit over the top. > > > I encourage The Powers", "> I encourage The Powers That Be™ to reconsider all their actions here,", "reconsider all their actions here, and think deeply about the types of behavior", "a position, she told me that big troubles are coming, now I understand", "That Be™ to reconsider all their actions here, and think deeply about the", "terrible handling of the actual firing, combined with the non-apology apology, are a", "to these new changes on SE, are we somehow affected? are our identities", "what is going on, combined with the terrible handling of the actual firing,", "now? Also moderators that suspend their activities commented or implied that they will", "the actual firing, combined with the non-apology apology, are a bit over the", "top. > > > I encourage The Powers That Be™ to reconsider all", "moderator suspended [activity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper/334390#334390) > > 'm a mod on Academia.SE. After reading the", "and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice and insightful,", "happened. Everything I read it seems like moderators knew from the start of", "or implied that they will come back, so what is the issue than?", "user was very nice and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I read it", "to reconsider all their actions here, and think deeply about the types of", "moderators that suspend their activities commented or implied that they will come back,", "here, and think deeply about the types of behavior they want to encourage", "[SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice", "to a well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand what is going on, combined", "third parties now? Also moderators that suspend their activities commented or implied that", "and location sold to third parties now? Also moderators that suspend their activities", "of the actual firing, combined with the non-apology apology, are a bit over", "are our identities and location sold to third parties now? Also moderators that", "they proceed with election for new moderators. When I asked one user why", "parties now? Also moderators that suspend their activities commented or implied that they", "very nice and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I read it seems like", "she told me that big troubles are coming, now I understand on what", "CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice and insightful, wonder", "well. The disrespect being shown to a well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand", "that they will come back, so what is the issue than? We as", "to understand what is going on, combined with the terrible handling of the", "of this year that something is going wrong, however they proceed with election", "going to temporarily suspend my mod activities as well. The disrespect being shown", "about the types of behavior they want to encourage in their community. Another", "back, so what is the issue than? We as the users are confused", "coming, now I understand on what she implied, however, if you all knew", "ordinary users how should react to these new changes on SE, are we", "We as the users are confused and would like to know more about", "to third parties now? Also moderators that suspend their activities commented or implied", "it seems like moderators knew from the start of this year that something", "moderators. When I asked one user why she didn't apply for a position,", "firing, combined with the non-apology apology, are a bit over the top. >", "well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand what is going on, combined with the", "big troubles are coming, now I understand on what she implied, however, if", "knew from the start of this year that something is going wrong, however", "After reading the official SE response, I'm going to temporarily suspend my mod", "we somehow affected? are our identities and location sold to third parties now?", "actions here, and think deeply about the types of behavior they want to", "SE response, I'm going to temporarily suspend my mod activities as well. The", "user why she didn't apply for a position, she told me that big", "to temporarily suspend my mod activities as well. The disrespect being shown to", "why she didn't apply for a position, she told me that big troubles", "think deeply about the types of behavior they want to encourage in their", "response, I'm going to temporarily suspend my mod activities as well. The disrespect", "their community. Another one wrote A request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User", "on what she implied, however, if you all knew that why moderators kept", "how should react to these new changes on SE, are we somehow affected?", "mod activities as well. The disrespect being shown to a well-respected volunteer simply", "one wrote A request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001)", "We as ordinary users how should react to these new changes on SE,", "going wrong, however they proceed with election for new moderators. When I asked", "a bit over the top. > > > I encourage The Powers That", "their actions here, and think deeply about the types of behavior they want", "Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice and insightful, wonder what happened.", "will come back, so what is the issue than? We as the users", "they will come back, so what is the issue than? We as the", "I understand on what she implied, however, if you all knew that why", "changes on SE, are we somehow affected? are our identities and location sold", "Be™ to reconsider all their actions here, and think deeply about the types", "in dark? We as ordinary users how should react to these new changes", "our identities and location sold to third parties now? Also moderators that suspend", "'m a mod on Academia.SE. After reading the official SE response, I'm going", "SE, are we somehow affected? are our identities and location sold to third", "asked one user why she didn't apply for a position, she told me", "temporarily suspend my mod activities as well. The disrespect being shown to a", "you all knew that why moderators kept us in dark? We as ordinary", "on, combined with the terrible handling of the actual firing, combined with the", "Another one wrote A request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente was", "User Apparente was [suspended](https://meta.stackexchange.com/users/287826/aparente001) That user was very nice and insightful, wonder what", "being shown to a well-respected volunteer simply trying to understand what is going", "The Powers That Be™ to reconsider all their actions here, and think deeply", "kept us in dark? We as ordinary users how should react to these", "on SE, are we somehow affected? are our identities and location sold to", "issue than? We as the users are confused and would like to know", "understand on what she implied, however, if you all knew that why moderators", "told me that big troubles are coming, now I understand on what she", "That user was very nice and insightful, wonder what happened. Everything I read", "didn't apply for a position, she told me that big troubles are coming,", "troubles are coming, now I understand on what she implied, however, if you", "is going wrong, however they proceed with election for new moderators. When I", "implied, however, if you all knew that why moderators kept us in dark?", "community. Another one wrote A request for [SE employees and CMs](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4622/a-request-for-se-employees-and-cms) User Apparente", "Also moderators that suspend their activities commented or implied that they will come", "trying to understand what is going on, combined with the terrible handling of", "combined with the non-apology apology, are a bit over the top. > >", "[activity](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper/334390#334390) > > 'm a mod on Academia.SE. After reading the official SE", "types of behavior they want to encourage in their community. Another one wrote", "read it seems like moderators knew from the start of this year that", "moderators knew from the start of this year that something is going wrong,", "election for new moderators. When I asked one user why she didn't apply", "start of this year that something is going wrong, however they proceed with", "as ordinary users how should react to these new changes on SE, are", "I encourage The Powers That Be™ to reconsider all their actions here, and", "> > I encourage The Powers That Be™ to reconsider all their actions", "a mod on Academia.SE. After reading the official SE response, I'm going to", "that why moderators kept us in dark? We as ordinary users how should", "why moderators kept us in dark? We as ordinary users how should react" ]
[ "if it was deliberate, or if we should create an “academic-writing” tag to", "editing tags for a question with only the “untagged” tag, and I noticed", "with only the “untagged” tag, and I noticed that there doesn’t seem to", "writing, this seems to be an oversight; I’m wondering if it was deliberate,", "I noticed that there doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that", "“academic-writing” tag. Given that a number of our questions seem to be about", "an oversight; I’m wondering if it was deliberate, or if we should create", "that there doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a number", "Given that a number of our questions seem to be about the process", "be an oversight; I’m wondering if it was deliberate, or if we should", "“untagged” tag, and I noticed that there doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing”", "a number of our questions seem to be about the process and contents", "that a number of our questions seem to be about the process and", "noticed that there doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a", "tag, and I noticed that there doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing” tag.", "number of our questions seem to be about the process and contents of", "of academic writing, this seems to be an oversight; I’m wondering if it", "seem to be about the process and contents of academic writing, this seems", "and contents of academic writing, this seems to be an oversight; I’m wondering", "seems to be an oversight; I’m wondering if it was deliberate, or if", "it was deliberate, or if we should create an “academic-writing” tag to cover", "to be an oversight; I’m wondering if it was deliberate, or if we", "oversight; I’m wondering if it was deliberate, or if we should create an", "this seems to be an oversight; I’m wondering if it was deliberate, or", "doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a number of our", "there doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a number of", "tags for a question with only the “untagged” tag, and I noticed that", "I was just editing tags for a question with only the “untagged” tag,", "I’m wondering if it was deliberate, or if we should create an “academic-writing”", "be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a number of our questions seem to", "be about the process and contents of academic writing, this seems to be", "of our questions seem to be about the process and contents of academic", "was deliberate, or if we should create an “academic-writing” tag to cover these", "process and contents of academic writing, this seems to be an oversight; I’m", "or if we should create an “academic-writing” tag to cover these sorts of", "deliberate, or if we should create an “academic-writing” tag to cover these sorts", "a question with only the “untagged” tag, and I noticed that there doesn’t", "our questions seem to be about the process and contents of academic writing,", "to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a number of our questions seem", "questions seem to be about the process and contents of academic writing, this", "to be about the process and contents of academic writing, this seems to", "about the process and contents of academic writing, this seems to be an", "if we should create an “academic-writing” tag to cover these sorts of questions.", "academic writing, this seems to be an oversight; I’m wondering if it was", "just editing tags for a question with only the “untagged” tag, and I", "tag. Given that a number of our questions seem to be about the", "for a question with only the “untagged” tag, and I noticed that there", "only the “untagged” tag, and I noticed that there doesn’t seem to be", "and I noticed that there doesn’t seem to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given", "wondering if it was deliberate, or if we should create an “academic-writing” tag", "the process and contents of academic writing, this seems to be an oversight;", "was just editing tags for a question with only the “untagged” tag, and", "the “untagged” tag, and I noticed that there doesn’t seem to be an", "question with only the “untagged” tag, and I noticed that there doesn’t seem", "seem to be an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a number of our questions", "an “academic-writing” tag. Given that a number of our questions seem to be", "contents of academic writing, this seems to be an oversight; I’m wondering if" ]
[ "about reopening (too many to read them all carefully.) Why is the question", "several bad answers. I cannot find any comments about reopening (too many to", "all carefully.) Why is the question open now? [Why are female students evaluating", "carefully.) Why is the question open now? [Why are female students evaluating my", "my closure reason comment has 25 upvotes. There are several bad answers. I", "There are several bad answers. I cannot find any comments about reopening (too", "comments about reopening (too many to read them all carefully.) Why is the", "many to read them all carefully.) Why is the question open now? [Why", "The question was closed. Currently, my closure reason comment has 25 upvotes. There", "reason comment has 25 upvotes. There are several bad answers. I cannot find", "Why is the question open now? [Why are female students evaluating my teaching", "question was closed. Currently, my closure reason comment has 25 upvotes. There are", "comment has 25 upvotes. There are several bad answers. I cannot find any", "find any comments about reopening (too many to read them all carefully.) Why", "25 upvotes. There are several bad answers. I cannot find any comments about", "cannot find any comments about reopening (too many to read them all carefully.)", "are several bad answers. I cannot find any comments about reopening (too many", "bad answers. I cannot find any comments about reopening (too many to read", "(too many to read them all carefully.) Why is the question open now?", "reopening (too many to read them all carefully.) Why is the question open", "I cannot find any comments about reopening (too many to read them all", "closure reason comment has 25 upvotes. There are several bad answers. I cannot", "read them all carefully.) Why is the question open now? [Why are female", "question open now? [Why are female students evaluating my teaching worse than males?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/142194/why-are-female-students-evaluating-my-teaching-worse-than-males?noredirect=1#comment377757_142194)", "them all carefully.) Why is the question open now? [Why are female students", "has 25 upvotes. There are several bad answers. I cannot find any comments", "was closed. Currently, my closure reason comment has 25 upvotes. There are several", "is the question open now? [Why are female students evaluating my teaching worse", "answers. I cannot find any comments about reopening (too many to read them", "the question open now? [Why are female students evaluating my teaching worse than", "Currently, my closure reason comment has 25 upvotes. There are several bad answers.", "any comments about reopening (too many to read them all carefully.) Why is", "to read them all carefully.) Why is the question open now? [Why are", "closed. Currently, my closure reason comment has 25 upvotes. There are several bad", "upvotes. There are several bad answers. I cannot find any comments about reopening" ]
[ "They are not acting on our feedback or telling us why they are", "me uncomfortable contributing to SE if they were going to sacrifice their core", "awesome community despite the interference of the management. Volunteer moderators and community members", "the SE policy is that the community opinion rules. If the community opinion", "that I have been a moderator, I have learned so much. I thank", "did not keep up with the growth in the communities. Then SE started", "Of course companies have to make money, but it made me uncomfortable contributing", "so against the SE opinion, the SE team has moderators who can handle", "5+ years that I have been a moderator, I have learned so much.", "that others can be more successful. When I joined Stack Exchange 8 years", "buck. Most recently SE has become an awesome community despite the interference of", "to be in disagreement with the community. I like to think that the", "company did not keep up with the growth in the communities. Then SE", "opinion rules. If the community opinion is so against the SE opinion, the", "not have the right to do is act like the boss and then", "sacrifice their core principals to make a buck. Most recently SE has become", "the community. Even before it was trendy, they cared about user privacy and", "can no longer contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore I am", "I can no longer contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore I", "the SE team has moderators who can handle it. If the SE team", "the whole thing from imploding. At first it was simply that the support", "will not be actively participating. I have been thinking about this for a", "you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that I have been a moderator, I", "Then SE started cutting support and diverting resources. A year ago, SE began", "made me uncomfortable contributing to SE if they were going to sacrifice their", "something so horrendous that I felt no choice but to leaving. That is", "[users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that I have been a moderator, I have", "they had developers actively working to make the experience better and employees whose", "SE policy is that the community opinion rules. If the community opinion is", "wish I had more time to show you through my actions that I", "my actions and in-actions, I wish I had more time to show you", "to shift and outwardly it seems building strong communities was no longer the", "to heart and have learned from it. Alas, all I can leave you", "accounts or content, but I will not be actively participating. I have been", "I am stepping down as a moderator and planning on leaving the community.", "I can leave you with is empty words that I am sorry that", "to transform into an awesome community where SE keeps the lights on and", "and was not negatively interfering with communities. The core values of the company", "from imploding. At first it was simply that the support from the company", "I have learned so much. I thank you all for working with me.", "mod only teacher's lounge) and in our public chat and meta. > >", "diverting resources. A year ago, SE began to transform into an awesome community", "it was an awesome community that had awesome support from the company. They", "contributions. Over time, SE became an awesome community with just enough support to", "to leaving. That is not a fair way to represent you, so I", "to keep the whole thing from imploding. At first it was simply that", "SE began to transform into an awesome community where SE keeps the lights", "have simply been biding my time until SE did something so horrendous that", "for advancing our community goals, I have simply been biding my time until", "began to transform into an awesome community where SE keeps the lights on", "working to make the experience better and employees whose jobs were to build", "are making the decisions they are. They are the boss, they have that", "amongst the greatest assets of SE. When I ran to be a moderator", "rules, so it will be difficult for me to be in disagreement with", "I have been a moderator, I have learned so much. I thank you", "If the community opinion is so against the SE opinion, the SE team", "on our feedback or telling us why they are making the decisions they", "Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it was an awesome community that had awesome", "with is empty words that I am sorry that I was not better.", "the servers, they had developers actively working to make the experience better and", "become clear that my views of our community now disagree with SE policy.", "opinion rules, so it will be difficult for me to be in disagreement", "actively working to make the experience better and employees whose jobs were to", "enough support to keep the whole thing from imploding. At first it was", "negatively interfering with communities. The core values of the company began to shift", "of the management. Volunteer moderators and community members are being asked to implement", "had developers actively working to make the experience better and employees whose jobs", "by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that I have been a moderator,", "just enough support to keep the whole thing from imploding. At first it", "that SE thinks are right for us. They are not acting on our", "gone to bat for us, and I have been unsuccessful. I am no", "about this for a while and it is not related to any single", "you with is empty words that I am sorry that I was not", "handle it. If the SE team really pisses our community off, I would", "have that right. What they do not have the right to do is", "I will not be deleting my accounts or content, but I will not", "and employees whose jobs were to build the community. Even before it was", "I am no longer an effective agent for advancing our community goals, I", "simply that the support from the company did not keep up with the", "make a buck. Most recently SE has become an awesome community despite the", "that I felt no choice but to leaving. That is not a fair", "in the hopes that others can be more successful. When I joined Stack", "company began to shift and outwardly it seems building strong communities was no", "thank you all for working with me. For those that I disappointed with", "actions that I have taken your criticism to heart and have learned from", "management. Volunteer moderators and community members are being asked to implement policies that", "or content, but I will not be actively participating. I have been thinking", "said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion is that the community opinion rules, so", "opinion, the SE team has moderators who can handle it. If the SE", "transform into an awesome community where SE keeps the lights on and was", "us, and I have been unsuccessful. I am no longer an effective agent", "moderators and community members are being asked to implement policies that SE thinks", "the boss and then say the community is [\"built and run by you", "became an awesome community with just enough support to keep the whole thing", "community. Even before it was trendy, they cared about user privacy and the", "community is [\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that", "be difficult for me to be in disagreement with the community. I like", "experience better and employees whose jobs were to build the community. Even before", "that I disappointed with my actions and in-actions, I wish I had more", "really pisses our community off, I would go to bat for our community", "I like to think that the SE policy is that the community opinion", "way to represent you, so I am stepping aside in the hopes that", "supportive. The SE Community Managers, past and present, are both knowledgeable and professional,", "in disagreement with the community. I like to think that the SE policy", "whose jobs were to build the community. Even before it was trendy, they", "be actively participating. I have been thinking about this for a while and", "heart and have learned from it. Alas, all I can leave you with", "personal opinion is that the community opinion rules, so it will be difficult", "opinion is that the community opinion rules, so it will be difficult for", "private (e.g., in the mod only teacher's lounge) and in our public chat", "it has become clear that my views of our community now disagree with", "support to keep the whole thing from imploding. At first it was simply", "would go to bat for our community in private (e.g., in the mod", "SE keeps the lights on and was not negatively interfering with communities. The", "and then say the community is [\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In", "is so against the SE opinion, the SE team has moderators who can", "to bat for us, and I have been unsuccessful. I am no longer", "they represent the community spirit that made SE great; they are amongst the", "be more successful. When I joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it was", "my efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore I am stepping down as a", "I will not be actively participating. I have been thinking about this for", "better and employees whose jobs were to build the community. Even before it", "the rights of our contributions. Over time, SE became an awesome community with", "for us. They are not acting on our feedback or telling us why", "time, SE became an awesome community with just enough support to keep the", "few months, it has become clear that my views of our community now", "others can be more successful. When I joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago,", "support from the company did not keep up with the growth in the", "and community members are being asked to implement policies that SE thinks are", "about user privacy and the rights of our contributions. Over time, SE became", "At first it was simply that the support from the company did not", "say the community is [\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+", "> > > Over the past few months, it has become clear that", "right for us. They are not acting on our feedback or telling us", "a while and it is not related to any single event. Our community", "of the company began to shift and outwardly it seems building strong communities", "awesome community where SE keeps the lights on and was not negatively interfering", "agent for advancing our community goals, I have simply been biding my time", "Stack Exchange and therefore I am stepping down as a moderator and planning", "no longer contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore I am stepping", "ago, it was an awesome community that had awesome support from the company.", "resources. A year ago, SE began to transform into an awesome community where", "assets of SE. When I ran to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): >", "joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it was an awesome community that had", "(e.g., in the mod only teacher's lounge) and in our public chat and", "those that I disappointed with my actions and in-actions, I wish I had", "a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion is that the community", "the community. I like to think that the SE policy is that the", "of our community now disagree with SE policy. I have gone to bat", "more time to show you through my actions that I have taken your", "core values of the company began to shift and outwardly it seems building", "so I am stepping aside in the hopes that others can be more", "the community opinion rules, so it will be difficult for me to be", "money was. Of course companies have to make money, but it made me", "outwardly it seems building strong communities was no longer the focus, making money", "more importantly, they represent the community spirit that made SE great; they are", "moderator and planning on leaving the community. I will not be deleting my", "whole thing from imploding. At first it was simply that the support from", "community spirit that made SE great; they are amongst the greatest assets of", "therefore I am stepping down as a moderator and planning on leaving the", "years that I have been a moderator, I have learned so much. I", "When I ran to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal", "off, I would go to bat for our community in private (e.g., in", "thinking about this for a while and it is not related to any", "My personal opinion is that the community opinion rules, so it will be", "you, so I am stepping aside in the hopes that others can be", "employees whose jobs were to build the community. Even before it was trendy,", "A year ago, SE began to transform into an awesome community where SE", "it seems building strong communities was no longer the focus, making money was.", "advancing our community goals, I have simply been biding my time until SE", "are right for us. They are not acting on our feedback or telling", "rules. If the community opinion is so against the SE opinion, the SE", "can leave you with is empty words that I am sorry that I", "right to do is act like the boss and then say the community", "that the community opinion rules. If the community opinion is so against the", "provided the servers, they had developers actively working to make the experience better", "to make a buck. Most recently SE has become an awesome community despite", "in-actions, I wish I had more time to show you through my actions", "They not only provided the servers, they had developers actively working to make", "Community Managers, past and present, are both knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly,", "started cutting support and diverting resources. A year ago, SE began to transform", "Alas, all I can leave you with is empty words that I am", "course companies have to make money, but it made me uncomfortable contributing to", "privacy and the rights of our contributions. Over time, SE became an awesome", "the lights on and was not negatively interfering with communities. The core values", "they were going to sacrifice their core principals to make a buck. Most", "in private (e.g., in the mod only teacher's lounge) and in our public", "can be more successful. When I joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it", "clear that my views of our community now disagree with SE policy. I", "they have that right. What they do not have the right to do", "implement policies that SE thinks are right for us. They are not acting", "for a while and it is not related to any single event. Our", "but it made me uncomfortable contributing to SE if they were going to", "I have gone to bat for us, and I have been unsuccessful. I", "bat for our community in private (e.g., in the mod only teacher's lounge)", "Most recently SE has become an awesome community despite the interference of the", "will not be deleting my accounts or content, but I will not be", "will be difficult for me to be in disagreement with the community. I", "been unsuccessful. I am no longer an effective agent for advancing our community", "great; they are amongst the greatest assets of SE. When I ran to", "an effective agent for advancing our community goals, I have simply been biding", "That is not a fair way to represent you, so I am stepping", "SE if they were going to sacrifice their core principals to make a", "> My personal opinion is that the community opinion rules, so it will", "and the rights of our contributions. Over time, SE became an awesome community", "community despite the interference of the management. Volunteer moderators and community members are", "decisions they are. They are the boss, they have that right. What they", "the SE opinion, the SE team has moderators who can handle it. If", "if they were going to sacrifice their core principals to make a buck.", "act like the boss and then say the community is [\"built and run", "only teacher's lounge) and in our public chat and meta. > > >", "community with just enough support to keep the whole thing from imploding. At", "in our public chat and meta. > > > Over the past few", "to sacrifice their core principals to make a buck. Most recently SE has", "have been thinking about this for a while and it is not related", "to Stack Exchange and therefore I am stepping down as a moderator and", "community is welcoming and supportive. The SE Community Managers, past and present, are", "the boss, they have that right. What they do not have the right", "and supportive. The SE Community Managers, past and present, are both knowledgeable and", "chat and meta. > > > Over the past few months, it has", "that right. What they do not have the right to do is act", "with communities. The core values of the company began to shift and outwardly", "criticism to heart and have learned from it. Alas, all I can leave", "as a moderator and planning on leaving the community. I will not be", "actions and in-actions, I wish I had more time to show you through", "community opinion is so against the SE opinion, the SE team has moderators", "community goals, I have simply been biding my time until SE did something", "our community now disagree with SE policy. I have gone to bat for", "actively participating. I have been thinking about this for a while and it", "more successful. When I joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it was an", "For those that I disappointed with my actions and in-actions, I wish I", "telling us why they are making the decisions they are. They are the", "to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion is that", "simply been biding my time until SE did something so horrendous that I", "keep up with the growth in the communities. Then SE started cutting support", "aside in the hopes that others can be more successful. When I joined", "months, it has become clear that my views of our community now disagree", "not be actively participating. I have been thinking about this for a while", "cutting support and diverting resources. A year ago, SE began to transform into", "lounge) and in our public chat and meta. > > > Over the", "for us, and I have been unsuccessful. I am no longer an effective", "stepping aside in the hopes that others can be more successful. When I", "acting on our feedback or telling us why they are making the decisions", "it. If the SE team really pisses our community off, I would go", "in the mod only teacher's lounge) and in our public chat and meta.", "our public chat and meta. > > > Over the past few months,", "been a moderator, I have learned so much. I thank you all for", "show you through my actions that I have taken your criticism to heart", "to any single event. Our community is welcoming and supportive. The SE Community", "represent the community spirit that made SE great; they are amongst the greatest", "the community opinion is so against the SE opinion, the SE team has", "from the company. They not only provided the servers, they had developers actively", "have been unsuccessful. I am no longer an effective agent for advancing our", "principals to make a buck. Most recently SE has become an awesome community", "the 5+ years that I have been a moderator, I have learned so", "community that had awesome support from the company. They not only provided the", "are not acting on our feedback or telling us why they are making", "moderator, I have learned so much. I thank you all for working with", "efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore I am stepping down as a moderator", "the community. I will not be deleting my accounts or content, but I", "of SE. When I ran to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > >", "but to leaving. That is not a fair way to represent you, so", "Over time, SE became an awesome community with just enough support to keep", "moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion is that the community opinion", "for our community in private (e.g., in the mod only teacher's lounge) and", "of our contributions. Over time, SE became an awesome community with just enough", "single event. Our community is welcoming and supportive. The SE Community Managers, past", "and present, are both knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly, they represent the", "an awesome community that had awesome support from the company. They not only", "and have learned from it. Alas, all I can leave you with is", "are amongst the greatest assets of SE. When I ran to be a", "began to shift and outwardly it seems building strong communities was no longer", "with the community. I like to think that the SE policy is that", "years ago, it was an awesome community that had awesome support from the", "not negatively interfering with communities. The core values of the company began to", "SE opinion, the SE team has moderators who can handle it. If the", "I have taken your criticism to heart and have learned from it. Alas,", "that my views of our community now disagree with SE policy. I have", "it was simply that the support from the company did not keep up", "money, but it made me uncomfortable contributing to SE if they were going", "now disagree with SE policy. I have gone to bat for us, and", "the interference of the management. Volunteer moderators and community members are being asked", "> > Over the past few months, it has become clear that my", "views of our community now disagree with SE policy. I have gone to", "professional, but more importantly, they represent the community spirit that made SE great;", "build the community. Even before it was trendy, they cared about user privacy", "choice but to leaving. That is not a fair way to represent you,", "to think that the SE policy is that the community opinion rules. If", "is welcoming and supportive. The SE Community Managers, past and present, are both", "is [\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that I", "the company began to shift and outwardly it seems building strong communities was", "importantly, they represent the community spirit that made SE great; they are amongst", "and in-actions, I wish I had more time to show you through my", "no longer an effective agent for advancing our community goals, I have simply", "SE team has moderators who can handle it. If the SE team really", "in the communities. Then SE started cutting support and diverting resources. A year", "that had awesome support from the company. They not only provided the servers,", "with my actions and in-actions, I wish I had more time to show", "bat for us, and I have been unsuccessful. I am no longer an", "SE has become an awesome community despite the interference of the management. Volunteer", "user privacy and the rights of our contributions. Over time, SE became an", "was not negatively interfering with communities. The core values of the company began", "policies that SE thinks are right for us. They are not acting on", "have decided that I can no longer contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange", "developers actively working to make the experience better and employees whose jobs were", "both knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly, they represent the community spirit that", "on leaving the community. I will not be deleting my accounts or content,", "Volunteer moderators and community members are being asked to implement policies that SE", "present, are both knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly, they represent the community", "Exchange and therefore I am stepping down as a moderator and planning on", "biding my time until SE did something so horrendous that I felt no", "while and it is not related to any single event. Our community is", "trendy, they cared about user privacy and the rights of our contributions. Over", "I wish I had more time to show you through my actions that", "longer contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore I am stepping down", "think that the SE policy is that the community opinion rules. If the", "my actions that I have taken your criticism to heart and have learned", "the growth in the communities. Then SE started cutting support and diverting resources.", "longer an effective agent for advancing our community goals, I have simply been", "not be deleting my accounts or content, but I will not be actively", "making the decisions they are. They are the boss, they have that right.", "like to think that the SE policy is that the community opinion rules.", "not acting on our feedback or telling us why they are making the", "like the boss and then say the community is [\"built and run by", "our community in private (e.g., in the mod only teacher's lounge) and in", "SE started cutting support and diverting resources. A year ago, SE began to", "recently SE has become an awesome community despite the interference of the management.", "longer the focus, making money was. Of course companies have to make money,", "seems building strong communities was no longer the focus, making money was. Of", "to bat for our community in private (e.g., in the mod only teacher's", "I am stepping aside in the hopes that others can be more successful.", "the right to do is act like the boss and then say the", "Managers, past and present, are both knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly, they", "feedback or telling us why they are making the decisions they are. They", "community. I like to think that the SE policy is that the community", "being asked to implement policies that SE thinks are right for us. They", "decided that I can no longer contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange and", "did something so horrendous that I felt no choice but to leaving. That", "an awesome community despite the interference of the management. Volunteer moderators and community", "SE did something so horrendous that I felt no choice but to leaving.", "to show you through my actions that I have taken your criticism to", "SE thinks are right for us. They are not acting on our feedback", "communities. The core values of the company began to shift and outwardly it", "The SE Community Managers, past and present, are both knowledgeable and professional, but", "Exchange 8 years ago, it was an awesome community that had awesome support", "is that the community opinion rules. If the community opinion is so against", "deleting my accounts or content, but I will not be actively participating. I", "were going to sacrifice their core principals to make a buck. Most recently", "have the right to do is act like the boss and then say", "keeps the lights on and was not negatively interfering with communities. The core", "run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that I have been a", "it will be difficult for me to be in disagreement with the community.", "with just enough support to keep the whole thing from imploding. At first", "and diverting resources. A year ago, SE began to transform into an awesome", "it made me uncomfortable contributing to SE if they were going to sacrifice", "I felt no choice but to leaving. That is not a fair way", "growth in the communities. Then SE started cutting support and diverting resources. A", "or telling us why they are making the decisions they are. They are", "down as a moderator and planning on leaving the community. I will not", "horrendous that I felt no choice but to leaving. That is not a", "the community spirit that made SE great; they are amongst the greatest assets", "make the experience better and employees whose jobs were to build the community.", "the hopes that others can be more successful. When I joined Stack Exchange", "contributing to SE if they were going to sacrifice their core principals to", "keep the whole thing from imploding. At first it was simply that the", "have to make money, but it made me uncomfortable contributing to SE if", "have learned from it. Alas, all I can leave you with is empty", "and outwardly it seems building strong communities was no longer the focus, making", "are. They are the boss, they have that right. What they do not", "imploding. At first it was simply that the support from the company did", "have learned so much. I thank you all for working with me. For", "with SE policy. I have gone to bat for us, and I have", "interference of the management. Volunteer moderators and community members are being asked to", "their core principals to make a buck. Most recently SE has become an", "goals, I have simply been biding my time until SE did something so", "felt no choice but to leaving. That is not a fair way to", "they are making the decisions they are. They are the boss, they have", "I have decided that I can no longer contribute my efforts to Stack", "they do not have the right to do is act like the boss", "they cared about user privacy and the rights of our contributions. Over time,", "my views of our community now disagree with SE policy. I have gone", "our feedback or telling us why they are making the decisions they are.", "and planning on leaving the community. I will not be deleting my accounts", "have gone to bat for us, and I have been unsuccessful. I am", "time to show you through my actions that I have taken your criticism", "going to sacrifice their core principals to make a buck. Most recently SE", "were to build the community. Even before it was trendy, they cared about", "policy is that the community opinion rules. If the community opinion is so", "that the community opinion rules, so it will be difficult for me to", "public chat and meta. > > > Over the past few months, it", "the SE team really pisses our community off, I would go to bat", "but I will not be actively participating. I have been thinking about this", "represent you, so I am stepping aside in the hopes that others can", "Over the past few months, it has become clear that my views of", "with me. For those that I disappointed with my actions and in-actions, I", "our community off, I would go to bat for our community in private", "was. Of course companies have to make money, but it made me uncomfortable", "moderators who can handle it. If the SE team really pisses our community", "SE policy. I have gone to bat for us, and I have been", "and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that I have been", "If the SE team really pisses our community off, I would go to", "so horrendous that I felt no choice but to leaving. That is not", "they are amongst the greatest assets of SE. When I ran to be", "community where SE keeps the lights on and was not negatively interfering with", "to SE if they were going to sacrifice their core principals to make", "the decisions they are. They are the boss, they have that right. What", "boss and then say the community is [\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour).", "the management. Volunteer moderators and community members are being asked to implement policies", "it. Alas, all I can leave you with is empty words that I", "past and present, are both knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly, they represent", "so it will be difficult for me to be in disagreement with the", "rights of our contributions. Over time, SE became an awesome community with just", "interfering with communities. The core values of the company began to shift and", "making money was. Of course companies have to make money, but it made", "thing from imploding. At first it was simply that the support from the", "difficult for me to be in disagreement with the community. I like to", "planning on leaving the community. I will not be deleting my accounts or", "become an awesome community despite the interference of the management. Volunteer moderators and", "us. They are not acting on our feedback or telling us why they", "lights on and was not negatively interfering with communities. The core values of", "opinion is so against the SE opinion, the SE team has moderators who", "team has moderators who can handle it. If the SE team really pisses", "no longer the focus, making money was. Of course companies have to make", "I would go to bat for our community in private (e.g., in the", "SE team really pisses our community off, I would go to bat for", "the past few months, it has become clear that my views of our", "community. I will not be deleting my accounts or content, but I will", "leave you with is empty words that I am sorry that I was", "Our community is welcoming and supportive. The SE Community Managers, past and present,", "When I joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it was an awesome community", "who can handle it. If the SE team really pisses our community off,", "policy. I have gone to bat for us, and I have been unsuccessful.", "welcoming and supportive. The SE Community Managers, past and present, are both knowledgeable", "communities was no longer the focus, making money was. Of course companies have", "an awesome community where SE keeps the lights on and was not negatively", "despite the interference of the management. Volunteer moderators and community members are being", "that the SE policy is that the community opinion rules. If the community", "effective agent for advancing our community goals, I have simply been biding my", "from the company did not keep up with the growth in the communities.", "be deleting my accounts or content, but I will not be actively participating.", "spirit that made SE great; they are amongst the greatest assets of SE.", "unsuccessful. I am no longer an effective agent for advancing our community goals,", "much. I thank you all for working with me. For those that I", "me. For those that I disappointed with my actions and in-actions, I wish", "disappointed with my actions and in-actions, I wish I had more time to", "ago, SE began to transform into an awesome community where SE keeps the", "I have been thinking about this for a while and it is not", "past few months, it has become clear that my views of our community", "the experience better and employees whose jobs were to build the community. Even", "why they are making the decisions they are. They are the boss, they", "but more importantly, they represent the community spirit that made SE great; they", "ran to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion is", "awesome community with just enough support to keep the whole thing from imploding.", "are being asked to implement policies that SE thinks are right for us.", "first it was simply that the support from the company did not keep", "asked to implement policies that SE thinks are right for us. They are", "boss, they have that right. What they do not have the right to", "a moderator and planning on leaving the community. I will not be deleting", "they are. They are the boss, they have that right. What they do", "support from the company. They not only provided the servers, they had developers", "only provided the servers, they had developers actively working to make the experience", "is that the community opinion rules, so it will be difficult for me", "am stepping aside in the hopes that others can be more successful. When", "hopes that others can be more successful. When I joined Stack Exchange 8", "the communities. Then SE started cutting support and diverting resources. A year ago,", "and I have been unsuccessful. I am no longer an effective agent for", "not a fair way to represent you, so I am stepping aside in", "am stepping down as a moderator and planning on leaving the community. I", "the community opinion rules. If the community opinion is so against the SE", "the greatest assets of SE. When I ran to be a moderator [I", "learned from it. Alas, all I can leave you with is empty words", "8 years ago, it was an awesome community that had awesome support from", "SE became an awesome community with just enough support to keep the whole", "support and diverting resources. A year ago, SE began to transform into an", "community off, I would go to bat for our community in private (e.g.,", "fair way to represent you, so I am stepping aside in the hopes", "company. They not only provided the servers, they had developers actively working to", "a buck. Most recently SE has become an awesome community despite the interference", "> > My personal opinion is that the community opinion rules, so it", "has become an awesome community despite the interference of the management. Volunteer moderators", "where SE keeps the lights on and was not negatively interfering with communities.", "our community goals, I have simply been biding my time until SE did", "knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly, they represent the community spirit that made", "am no longer an effective agent for advancing our community goals, I have", "has moderators who can handle it. If the SE team really pisses our", "jobs were to build the community. Even before it was trendy, they cared", "> Over the past few months, it has become clear that my views", "have been a moderator, I have learned so much. I thank you all", "me to be in disagreement with the community. I like to think that", "be in disagreement with the community. I like to think that the SE", "the community is [\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years", "community in private (e.g., in the mod only teacher's lounge) and in our", "related to any single event. Our community is welcoming and supportive. The SE", "stepping down as a moderator and planning on leaving the community. I will", "building strong communities was no longer the focus, making money was. Of course", "to do is act like the boss and then say the community is", "to make the experience better and employees whose jobs were to build the", "pisses our community off, I would go to bat for our community in", "my time until SE did something so horrendous that I felt no choice", "it was trendy, they cared about user privacy and the rights of our", "They are the boss, they have that right. What they do not have", "not keep up with the growth in the communities. Then SE started cutting", "was trendy, they cared about user privacy and the rights of our contributions.", "community now disagree with SE policy. I have gone to bat for us,", "awesome community that had awesome support from the company. They not only provided", "companies have to make money, but it made me uncomfortable contributing to SE", "SE. When I ran to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My", "community members are being asked to implement policies that SE thinks are right", "is not a fair way to represent you, so I am stepping aside", "to represent you, so I am stepping aside in the hopes that others", "to make money, but it made me uncomfortable contributing to SE if they", "through my actions that I have taken your criticism to heart and have", "and in our public chat and meta. > > > Over the past", "disagree with SE policy. I have gone to bat for us, and I", "core principals to make a buck. Most recently SE has become an awesome", "until SE did something so horrendous that I felt no choice but to", "leaving the community. I will not be deleting my accounts or content, but", "us why they are making the decisions they are. They are the boss,", "contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore I am stepping down as", "working with me. For those that I disappointed with my actions and in-actions,", "this for a while and it is not related to any single event.", "SE great; they are amongst the greatest assets of SE. When I ran", "had awesome support from the company. They not only provided the servers, they", "community opinion rules, so it will be difficult for me to be in", "and professional, but more importantly, they represent the community spirit that made SE", "that the support from the company did not keep up with the growth", "has become clear that my views of our community now disagree with SE", "team really pisses our community off, I would go to bat for our", "communities. Then SE started cutting support and diverting resources. A year ago, SE", "was no longer the focus, making money was. Of course companies have to", "[\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the 5+ years that I have", "I disappointed with my actions and in-actions, I wish I had more time", "my accounts or content, but I will not be actively participating. I have", "can handle it. If the SE team really pisses our community off, I", "the focus, making money was. Of course companies have to make money, but", "uncomfortable contributing to SE if they were going to sacrifice their core principals", "is not related to any single event. Our community is welcoming and supportive.", "focus, making money was. Of course companies have to make money, but it", "been thinking about this for a while and it is not related to", "from it. Alas, all I can leave you with is empty words that", "that I can no longer contribute my efforts to Stack Exchange and therefore", "greatest assets of SE. When I ran to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929):", "is act like the boss and then say the community is [\"built and", "content, but I will not be actively participating. I have been thinking about", "time until SE did something so horrendous that I felt no choice but", "leaving. That is not a fair way to represent you, so I am", "any single event. Our community is welcoming and supportive. The SE Community Managers,", "I have simply been biding my time until SE did something so horrendous", "our contributions. Over time, SE became an awesome community with just enough support", "values of the company began to shift and outwardly it seems building strong", "not related to any single event. Our community is welcoming and supportive. The", "was simply that the support from the company did not keep up with", "servers, they had developers actively working to make the experience better and employees", "I ran to be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion", "be a moderator [I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion is that the", "make money, but it made me uncomfortable contributing to SE if they were", "year ago, SE began to transform into an awesome community where SE keeps", "right. What they do not have the right to do is act like", "the support from the company did not keep up with the growth in", "a moderator, I have learned so much. I thank you all for working", "it is not related to any single event. Our community is welcoming and", "you through my actions that I have taken your criticism to heart and", "on and was not negatively interfering with communities. The core values of the", "do is act like the boss and then say the community is [\"built", "taken your criticism to heart and have learned from it. Alas, all I", "up with the growth in the communities. Then SE started cutting support and", "are the boss, they have that right. What they do not have the", "to implement policies that SE thinks are right for us. They are not", "for me to be in disagreement with the community. I like to think", "been biding my time until SE did something so horrendous that I felt", "all for working with me. For those that I disappointed with my actions", "that I have taken your criticism to heart and have learned from it.", "so much. I thank you all for working with me. For those that", "all I can leave you with is empty words that I am sorry", "that made SE great; they are amongst the greatest assets of SE. When", "before it was trendy, they cared about user privacy and the rights of", "disagreement with the community. I like to think that the SE policy is", "and it is not related to any single event. Our community is welcoming", "I thank you all for working with me. For those that I disappointed", "you all for working with me. For those that I disappointed with my", "have taken your criticism to heart and have learned from it. Alas, all", "the company did not keep up with the growth in the communities. Then", "participating. I have been thinking about this for a while and it is", "are both knowledgeable and professional, but more importantly, they represent the community spirit", "SE Community Managers, past and present, are both knowledgeable and professional, but more", "go to bat for our community in private (e.g., in the mod only", "an awesome community with just enough support to keep the whole thing from", "for working with me. For those that I disappointed with my actions and", "no choice but to leaving. That is not a fair way to represent", "successful. When I joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it was an awesome", "cared about user privacy and the rights of our contributions. Over time, SE", "learned so much. I thank you all for working with me. For those", "shift and outwardly it seems building strong communities was no longer the focus,", "community opinion rules. If the community opinion is so against the SE opinion,", "Even before it was trendy, they cared about user privacy and the rights", "What they do not have the right to do is act like the", "your criticism to heart and have learned from it. Alas, all I can", "the mod only teacher's lounge) and in our public chat and meta. >", "made SE great; they are amongst the greatest assets of SE. When I", "against the SE opinion, the SE team has moderators who can handle it.", "with the growth in the communities. Then SE started cutting support and diverting", "I had more time to show you through my actions that I have", "members are being asked to implement policies that SE thinks are right for", "into an awesome community where SE keeps the lights on and was not", "teacher's lounge) and in our public chat and meta. > > > Over", "[I said](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/1009/929): > > My personal opinion is that the community opinion rules,", "was an awesome community that had awesome support from the company. They not", "the company. They not only provided the servers, they had developers actively working", "and therefore I am stepping down as a moderator and planning on leaving", "then say the community is [\"built and run by you [users]\"](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tour). In the", "I have been unsuccessful. I am no longer an effective agent for advancing", "awesome support from the company. They not only provided the servers, they had", "strong communities was no longer the focus, making money was. Of course companies", "meta. > > > Over the past few months, it has become clear", "and meta. > > > Over the past few months, it has become", "not only provided the servers, they had developers actively working to make the", "do not have the right to do is act like the boss and", "a fair way to represent you, so I am stepping aside in the", "The core values of the company began to shift and outwardly it seems", "event. Our community is welcoming and supportive. The SE Community Managers, past and", "In the 5+ years that I have been a moderator, I have learned", "to build the community. Even before it was trendy, they cared about user", "had more time to show you through my actions that I have taken", "thinks are right for us. They are not acting on our feedback or", "I joined Stack Exchange 8 years ago, it was an awesome community that" ]
[ "flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post my own thoughts in an", "a few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both rather", "if/how the community wishes to deal with this particular. It's already had a", "during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands", "accurate. I'm curious if/how the community wishes to deal with this particular. It's", "diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers, but [one in", "[one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both rather non-politically correct and also", "wishes to deal with this particular. It's already had a few flags raised", "answer the diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers, but", "to deal with this particular. It's already had a few flags raised (rude/abusive,", "question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73)", "this particular. It's already had a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer).", "(rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post my own thoughts in an answer below.", "I'm curious if/how the community wishes to deal with this particular. It's already", "but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both rather non-politically correct and", "to answer the diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers,", "few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both rather non-politically", "non-politically correct and also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the community wishes to", "particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both rather non-politically correct and also quite accurate.", "It's already had a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post", "already had a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post my", "question [How to answer the diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a", "few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post my own thoughts in", "[How to answer the diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few", "with this particular. It's already had a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an", "curious if/how the community wishes to deal with this particular. It's already had", "particular. It's already had a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll", "interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as", "a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post my own thoughts", "faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out", "both rather non-politically correct and also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the community", "correct and also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the community wishes to deal", "had a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post my own", "out as being both rather non-politically correct and also quite accurate. I'm curious", "answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both rather non-politically correct", "rather non-politically correct and also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the community wishes", "The question [How to answer the diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted", "also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the community wishes to deal with this", "being both rather non-politically correct and also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the", "raised (rude/abusive, not an answer). I'll post my own thoughts in an answer", "deal with this particular. It's already had a few flags raised (rude/abusive, not", "quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the community wishes to deal with this particular.", "the community wishes to deal with this particular. It's already had a few", "in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both rather non-politically correct and also quite", "the diversity question during faculty interview](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143541/73) has attracted a few answers, but [one", "attracted a few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being both", "community wishes to deal with this particular. It's already had a few flags", "stands out as being both rather non-politically correct and also quite accurate. I'm", "has attracted a few answers, but [one in particular](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/143572/73) stands out as being", "as being both rather non-politically correct and also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how", "and also quite accurate. I'm curious if/how the community wishes to deal with" ]
[ "answered by consulting the appropriate style guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format", "show little or no research effort and can be answered by consulting the", "you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site", "Academia.SE, with a link to a meta Q&A that explains the level of", "using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > > Would it be useful to", "have you done?\" type of close reason on Academia.SE, with a link to", "close reason: > > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if", "a Book's title, its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of", "doesn't have this close reason. English.SE has the following close reason: > >", "the in-text citation of a Book's title, its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873)", "consider if your question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that", "are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no research", "and only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be able", "repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format the in-text citation of", "* [Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I cite an", "love to be able to flag these for closing for lack of research,", "> > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if your question", "* [How to format the in-text citation of a Book's title, its authors,", "Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I cite an article with", "[Bibliography format with multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how", "APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I cite an article with no page", "do I cite an article with no page numbers and only a DOI", "by consulting the appropriate style guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format with", "be answered by consulting the appropriate style guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography", "guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple citations from same book?", "in-text citation of a Book's title, its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) ", "format with multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) [In APA, how would", "and can be answered by consulting the appropriate style guide. Some recent examples:", "you done?\" type of close reason on Academia.SE, with a link to a", "would love to be able to flag these for closing for lack of", "of the [citation-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citation-style \"show questions tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are erroneously", "our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can be answered using [commonly-available", "have a \"What research have you done?\" type of close reason on Academia.SE,", "'citations'\"), show little or no research effort and can be answered by consulting", "[English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573)", "style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I cite an article with no page numbers", "examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In", "(APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how would one cite the same source repeatedly with", "off-topic. > > > Would it be useful to have a \"What research", "Would it be useful to have a \"What research have you done?\" type", "able to flag these for closing for lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't", "references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > > Would it be useful to have a", "same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how would one cite the same source", "has the following close reason: > > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done,", "these for closing for lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this close", "some of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little", "APA, how would one cite the same source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873)", "are off-topic. > > > Would it be useful to have a \"What", "question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can be answered", "tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no research effort and", "a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be able to flag", "to flag these for closing for lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have", "flag these for closing for lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this", "done?\" type of close reason on Academia.SE, with a link to a meta", "* [Bibliography format with multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA,", "with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format the in-text citation of a", "have this close reason. English.SE has the following close reason: > > Please", "that can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > > Would", "\"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no research effort and can be", "\"show questions tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show", "'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"),", "reason on Academia.SE, with a link to a meta Q&A that explains the", "erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no research effort", "citation of a Book's title, its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting", "on Academia.SE, with a link to a meta Q&A that explains the level", "I would love to be able to flag these for closing for lack", "numbers and only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be", "[How do I cite an article with no page numbers and only a", "no page numbers and only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love", "source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format the in-text citation", "better. Questions that can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > >", "only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be able to", "reason. English.SE has the following close reason: > > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039)", "DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be able to flag these", "cite the same source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format", "its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do", "or consider if your question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions", "questions, some of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show", "> > Would it be useful to have a \"What research have you", "effort and can be answered by consulting the appropriate style guide. Some recent", "format the in-text citation of a Book's title, its authors, and its publication", "[citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no research effort and can", "this close reason. English.SE has the following close reason: > > Please include", "your question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can be", "suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can be answered using", "tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no research effort and can be answered by", "research have you done?\" type of close reason on Academia.SE, with a link", "[research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/)", "of close reason on Academia.SE, with a link to a meta Q&A that", "differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format the in-text citation of a Book's", "\"What research have you done?\" type of close reason on Academia.SE, with a", "appropriate style guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple citations from", "site better. Questions that can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. >", "> > > Would it be useful to have a \"What research have", "but Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason. English.SE has the following close reason:", "with multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how would one", "of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I cite an article with no", "a \"What research have you done?\" type of close reason on Academia.SE, with", "of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or", "close reason. English.SE has the following close reason: > > Please include the", "page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format the in-text citation of a Book's title,", "title, its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of APA style", "year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I cite", "closing for lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason. English.SE", "citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how would one cite the", "[Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I cite an article", "Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are", "how would one cite the same source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) ", "an article with no page numbers and only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873)", "Many of the [citation-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citation-style \"show questions tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are", "would one cite the same source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) [How", "one cite the same source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to", "[How to format the in-text citation of a Book's title, its authors, and", "> Would it be useful to have a \"What research have you done?\"", "* [How do I cite an article with no page numbers and only", "be useful to have a \"What research have you done?\" type of close", "to be able to flag these for closing for lack of research, but", "its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873)", "numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format the in-text citation of a Book's title, its", "Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason. English.SE has the following close reason: >", "format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be able to flag these for closing for", "same source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format the in-text", "article with no page numbers and only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I", "done, or consider if your question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better.", "for lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason. English.SE has", "no research effort and can be answered by consulting the appropriate style guide.", "close reason on Academia.SE, with a link to a meta Q&A that explains", "little or no research effort and can be answered by consulting the appropriate", "publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How do I", "number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be able to flag these for", "a link to a meta Q&A that explains the level of research expected?", "the following close reason: > > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or", "be able to flag these for closing for lack of research, but Academia.SE", "research effort and can be answered by consulting the appropriate style guide. Some", "type of close reason on Academia.SE, with a link to a meta Q&A", "the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our [English Language", "research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason. English.SE has the following close", "can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > > Would it", "to format the in-text citation of a Book's title, its authors, and its", "answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > > Would it be useful", "[In APA, how would one cite the same source repeatedly with differing page", "I cite an article with no page numbers and only a DOI number", "reason: > > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if your", "the same source repeatedly with differing page numbers?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/143118/43873) * [How to format the", "Questions that can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > >", "which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no", "page numbers and only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to", "book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how would one cite the same source repeatedly", "can be answered by consulting the appropriate style guide. Some recent examples: ", "and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) [Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) * [How", "[citation-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citation-style \"show questions tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations", "of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason. English.SE has the following", "or no research effort and can be answered by consulting the appropriate style", "English.SE has the following close reason: > > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve", "with a link to a meta Q&A that explains the level of research", "tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions tagged", "authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of APA style reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) ", "reference](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145216/43873) [How do I cite an article with no page numbers and", "style guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple citations from same", "it be useful to have a \"What research have you done?\" type of", "following close reason: > > Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider", "* [In APA, how would one cite the same source repeatedly with differing", "Book's title, its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title of APA", "be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > > Would it be", "useful to have a \"What research have you done?\" type of close reason", "include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our [English", "to have a \"What research have you done?\" type of close reason on", "the appropriate style guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple citations", "recent examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) ", "from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) [In APA, how would one cite the same", "of a Book's title, its authors, and its publication year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145136/43873) * [Sorting Title", "questions tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are erroneously tagged [citations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citations \"show questions", "the [citation-style](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/citation-style \"show questions tagged 'citation-style'\") questions, some of which are erroneously tagged", "Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our", "with no page numbers and only a DOI number (APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would", "consulting the appropriate style guide. Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple", "[commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic. > > > Would it be useful to have", "lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason. English.SE has the", "questions tagged 'citations'\"), show little or no research effort and can be answered", "> Please include the [research](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5039) you’ve done, or consider if your question suits", "Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can be answered using [commonly-available references](https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2573) are off-topic.", "(APA format)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144170/43873) I would love to be able to flag these for closing", "cite an article with no page numbers and only a DOI number (APA", "if your question suits our [English Language Learners](https://ell.stackexchange.com/) site better. Questions that can", "Some recent examples: * [Bibliography format with multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873)", "for closing for lack of research, but Academia.SE doesn't have this close reason.", "multiple citations from same book? (APA)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144718/43873) * [In APA, how would one cite" ]
[ "they have to entirely change their teaching toolset in the next few weeks", "resources, or at the very least, collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread can", "least, collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread can also serve as an exchange", "can be, but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find", "[chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find themselves in a situation where they", "their teaching toolset in the next few weeks can post resources, or at", "at the very least, collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread can also serve", "very least, collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread can also serve as an", "created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find themselves in a situation", "in the next few weeks can post resources, or at the very least,", "can post resources, or at the very least, collectively whine. I suppose this", "situation where they have to entirely change their teaching toolset in the next", "weeks can post resources, or at the very least, collectively whine. I suppose", "find themselves in a situation where they have to entirely change their teaching", "how much help I can be, but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where", "be, but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find themselves", "room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find themselves in a situation where they have", "few weeks can post resources, or at the very least, collectively whine. I", "I don't know how much help I can be, but I've created a", "the next few weeks can post resources, or at the very least, collectively", "or at the very least, collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread can also", "next few weeks can post resources, or at the very least, collectively whine.", "whine. I suppose this meta-thread can also serve as an exchange of sorts,", "help I can be, but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who", "change their teaching toolset in the next few weeks can post resources, or", "the very least, collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread can also serve as", "suppose this meta-thread can also serve as an exchange of sorts, if no", "don't know how much help I can be, but I've created a [chat", "teaching toolset in the next few weeks can post resources, or at the", "know how much help I can be, but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat)", "who suddenly find themselves in a situation where they have to entirely change", "to entirely change their teaching toolset in the next few weeks can post", "toolset in the next few weeks can post resources, or at the very", "much help I can be, but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people", "people who suddenly find themselves in a situation where they have to entirely", "I can be, but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly", "this meta-thread can also serve as an exchange of sorts, if no one", "I suppose this meta-thread can also serve as an exchange of sorts, if", "meta-thread can also serve as an exchange of sorts, if no one objects.", "I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find themselves in a", "have to entirely change their teaching toolset in the next few weeks can", "suddenly find themselves in a situation where they have to entirely change their", "collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread can also serve as an exchange of", "but I've created a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find themselves in", "post resources, or at the very least, collectively whine. I suppose this meta-thread", "a situation where they have to entirely change their teaching toolset in the", "where people who suddenly find themselves in a situation where they have to", "where they have to entirely change their teaching toolset in the next few", "themselves in a situation where they have to entirely change their teaching toolset", "entirely change their teaching toolset in the next few weeks can post resources,", "a [chat room](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) where people who suddenly find themselves in a situation where", "in a situation where they have to entirely change their teaching toolset in" ]
[ "as “shopping”?** * Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links", "vote. These have been very slow to earn closure votes, with the still", "don’t see them as closure-worthy. But at the same time, the language on", "light of the corona-virus closures. Here are three: * [Creating a secure test", "[another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current posts where people are asking", "to directly relate. There are two related questions here: 1. It seems to", "of this as an answer to the meta thread on faculty support during", "missing? 2. Should we be closing these sorts of questions (if not off", "for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) ", "documentation, that these count as shopping questions. Is there another interpretation I’m missing?", "open one sitting at one vote for several days, which suggests a lot", "days, which suggests a lot of the people who spend time in the", "time, the language on commercial software seems to directly relate. There are two", "two related questions here: 1. It seems to me, when I read our", "scope for another reason)? If not, does it require a change to the", "spend time in the review queues don’t see them as closure-worthy. But at", "the still open one sitting at one vote for several days, which suggests", "thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to. The points of interest contain", "of the corona-virus closures. Here are three: [Creating a secure test environment", "to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed, and the other has a", "at the same time, the language on commercial software seems to directly relate.", "make sense as its own question. What questions should be closed as “shopping”?", "teach remotely, in light of the corona-virus closures. Here are three: * [Creating", "software that can be used to teach remotely, in light of the corona-virus", "as an answer to the meta thread on faculty support during the corona", "it was suggested that it might make sense as its own question. *What", "these count as shopping questions. Is there another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should", "an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we", "has a close vote. These have been very slow to earn closure votes,", "closures. Here are three: * [Creating a secure test environment for a programming", "closing these sorts of questions (if not off scope for another reason)? If", "* And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current posts where people", "in light of the corona-virus closures. Here are three: * [Creating a secure", "to earn closure votes, with the still open one sitting at one vote", "* Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to. The", "related questions here: 1. It seems to me, when I read our official", "environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools)", "there another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we be closing these sorts of", "off scope for another reason)? If not, does it require a change to", "are three: * [Creating a secure test environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical)", "language on commercial software seems to directly relate. There are two related questions", "corona virus, but it was suggested that it might make sense as its", "in the review queues don’t see them as closure-worthy. But at the same", "closure votes, with the still open one sitting at one vote for several", "specifically. * Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions)", "another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. * Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) ", "to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited)", "of the people who spend time in the review queues don’t see them", "It seems to me, when I read our official documentation, that these count", "[meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to. The points of interest", "to. The points of interest contain “a commercial online service”, [linking to another", "service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. * Here’s an older [discussion", "used to teach remotely, in light of the corona-virus closures. Here are three:", "I posted the gist of this as an answer to the meta thread", "our official documentation, that these count as shopping questions. Is there another interpretation", "tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed, and the", "programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to", "who spend time in the review queues don’t see them as closure-worthy. But", "on that specifically. * Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another", "* [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two", "the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to. The points of", "links to. The points of interest contain “a commercial online service”, [linking to", "then we have current posts where people are asking for lists of software", "meta thread on faculty support during the corona virus, but it was suggested", "with the still open one sitting at one vote for several days, which", "reason)? If not, does it require a change to the language in the", "as closure-worthy. But at the same time, the language on commercial software seems", "current posts where people are asking for lists of software that can be", "was suggested that it might make sense as its own question. *What questions", "And then we have current posts where people are asking for lists of", "posts where people are asking for lists of software that can be used", "[Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of", "suggested that it might make sense as its own question. *What questions should", "thread on faculty support during the corona virus, but it was suggested that", "me, when I read our official documentation, that these count as shopping questions.", "[discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current", "online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. * Here’s an older", "an answer to the meta thread on faculty support during the corona virus,", "But at the same time, the language on commercial software seems to directly", "documentation links to. The points of interest contain “a commercial online service”, [linking", "to me, when I read our official documentation, that these count as shopping", "questions should be closed as “shopping”?** * Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping)", "very slow to earn closure votes, with the still open one sitting at", "lot of the people who spend time in the review queues don’t see", "one vote for several days, which suggests a lot of the people who", "the people who spend time in the review queues don’t see them as", "commercial software seems to directly relate. There are two related questions here: 1.", "the review queues don’t see them as closure-worthy. But at the same time,", "as shopping questions. Is there another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we be", "discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. * Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And", "for another reason)? If not, does it require a change to the language", "“a commercial online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. * Here’s", "where people are asking for lists of software that can be used to", "These have been very slow to earn closure votes, with the still open", "this as an answer to the meta thread on faculty support during the", "corona-virus closures. Here are three: * [Creating a secure test environment for a", "to the meta thread on faculty support during the corona virus, but it", "sitting at one vote for several days, which suggests a lot of the", "be closing these sorts of questions (if not off scope for another reason)?", "Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to. The points", "still open one sitting at one vote for several days, which suggests a", "relate. There are two related questions here: 1. It seems to me, when", "own question. What questions should be closed as “shopping”? * Here’s the [meta", "[Creating a secure test environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to", "faculty support during the corona virus, but it was suggested that it might", "read our official documentation, that these count as shopping questions. Is there another", "and the other has a close vote. These have been very slow to", "(if not off scope for another reason)? If not, does it require a", "have been very slow to earn closure votes, with the still open one", "should be closed as “shopping”?** * Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that", "questions (if not off scope for another reason)? If not, does it require", "to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these", "here: 1. It seems to me, when I read our official documentation, that", "to teach remotely, in light of the corona-virus closures. Here are three: ", "from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to. The points of interest contain “a", "of these are closed, and the other has a close vote. These have", "interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we be closing these sorts of questions (if", "on faculty support during the corona virus, but it was suggested that it", "posted the gist of this as an answer to the meta thread on", "that can be used to teach remotely, in light of the corona-virus closures.", "of interest contain “a commercial online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that", "a lot of the people who spend time in the review queues don’t", "for lists of software that can be used to teach remotely, in light", "[Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed, and the other has", "The points of interest contain “a commercial online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services)", "a close vote. These have been very slow to earn closure votes, with", "questions. Is there another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we be closing these", "Here are three: [Creating a secure test environment for a programming lab", "the meta thread on faculty support during the corona virus, but it was", "proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed,", "which suggests a lot of the people who spend time in the review", "test environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing", "contain “a commercial online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. ", "queues don’t see them as closure-worthy. But at the same time, the language", "closed as “shopping”?* * Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation", "secure test environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name proprietary", "a secure test environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name", "virus, but it was suggested that it might make sense as its own", "close vote. These have been very slow to earn closure votes, with the", "I’m missing? 2. Should we be closing these sorts of questions (if not", "questions here: 1. It seems to me, when I read our official documentation,", "we have current posts where people are asking for lists of software that", "the corona virus, but it was suggested that it might make sense as", "lists of software that can be used to teach remotely, in light of", "the corona-virus closures. Here are three: * [Creating a secure test environment for", "when I read our official documentation, that these count as shopping questions. Is", "slow to earn closure votes, with the still open one sitting at one", "points of interest contain “a commercial online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on", "that specifically. * Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from", "several days, which suggests a lot of the people who spend time in", "people who spend time in the review queues don’t see them as closure-worthy.", "are closed, and the other has a close vote. These have been very", "closure-worthy. But at the same time, the language on commercial software seems to", "be used to teach remotely, in light of the corona-virus closures. Here are", "another reason)? If not, does it require a change to the language in", "that the documentation links to. The points of interest contain “a commercial online", "them as closure-worthy. But at the same time, the language on commercial software", "the same time, the language on commercial software seems to directly relate. There", "three: * [Creating a secure test environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) ", "are asking for lists of software that can be used to teach remotely,", "that these count as shopping questions. Is there another interpretation I’m missing? 2.", "during the corona virus, but it was suggested that it might make sense", "question. What questions should be closed as “shopping”?* * Here’s the [meta thread", "practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations)", "that it might make sense as its own question. *What questions should be", "suggests a lot of the people who spend time in the review queues", "directly relate. There are two related questions here: 1. It seems to me,", "There are two related questions here: 1. It seems to me, when I", " [Creating a secure test environment for a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives", "votes, with the still open one sitting at one vote for several days,", "closed, and the other has a close vote. These have been very slow", "for several days, which suggests a lot of the people who spend time", "earn closure votes, with the still open one sitting at one vote for", "as its own question. What questions should be closed as “shopping”? * Here’s", "sense as its own question. What questions should be closed as “shopping”? ", "these sorts of questions (if not off scope for another reason)? If not,", "remotely, in light of the corona-virus closures. Here are three: [Creating a", "might make sense as its own question. *What questions should be closed as", "are two related questions here: 1. It seems to me, when I read", "a programming lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software", "presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed, and the other has a close vote.", "can be used to teach remotely, in light of the corona-virus closures. Here", "1. It seems to me, when I read our official documentation, that these", "count as shopping questions. Is there another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we", "have current posts where people are asking for lists of software that can", "not off scope for another reason)? If not, does it require a change", "it might make sense as its own question. *What questions should be closed", " [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed, and the other", "at one vote for several days, which suggests a lot of the people", "on commercial software seems to directly relate. There are two related questions here:", "2. Should we be closing these sorts of questions (if not off scope", "interest contain “a commercial online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically.", "sorts of questions (if not off scope for another reason)? If not, does", "same time, the language on commercial software seems to directly relate. There are", "gist of this as an answer to the meta thread on faculty support", "vote for several days, which suggests a lot of the people who spend", "the documentation links to. The points of interest contain “a commercial online service”,", "people are asking for lists of software that can be used to teach", "the language on commercial software seems to directly relate. There are two related", "big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are", "older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have", "one sitting at one vote for several days, which suggests a lot of", "And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current posts where people are", "been very slow to earn closure votes, with the still open one sitting", "What questions should be closed as “shopping”? * Here’s the [meta thread from", "I read our official documentation, that these count as shopping questions. Is there", "be closed as “shopping”?** * Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the", "seems to directly relate. There are two related questions here: 1. It seems", "support during the corona virus, but it was suggested that it might make", "“shopping”?** * Here’s the [meta thread from 2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to.", "but it was suggested that it might make sense as its own question.", "shopping questions. Is there another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we be closing", "If not, does it require a change to the language in the rules?", "other has a close vote. These have been very slow to earn closure", "live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed, and the other has a close", "remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream presentations](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145222/software-to-live-stream-presentations) Two of these are closed, and", "lab practical](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145321/creating-a-secure-test-environment-for-a-lab-practical) * [Alternatives to big-name proprietary remote-lecturing tools](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/145280/alternatives-to-big-name-proprietary-remote-lecturing-tools) * [Software to live-stream", "Two of these are closed, and the other has a close vote. These", "Should we be closing these sorts of questions (if not off scope for", "2017](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3657/why-was-my-question-put-on-hold-for-shopping) that the documentation links to. The points of interest contain “a commercial", "Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then", "official documentation, that these count as shopping questions. Is there another interpretation I’m", "of questions (if not off scope for another reason)? If not, does it", "another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we be closing these sorts of questions", "software seems to directly relate. There are two related questions here: 1. It", "review queues don’t see them as closure-worthy. But at the same time, the", "asking for lists of software that can be used to teach remotely, in", "from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current posts", "the other has a close vote. These have been very slow to earn", "see them as closure-worthy. But at the same time, the language on commercial", "[linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. * Here’s an older [discussion from", "from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current posts where people are asking for", "time in the review queues don’t see them as closure-worthy. But at the", "answer to the meta thread on faculty support during the corona virus, but", "the gist of this as an answer to the meta thread on faculty", "seems to me, when I read our official documentation, that these count as", "Is there another interpretation I’m missing? 2. Should we be closing these sorts", "* Here’s an older [discussion from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And", "these are closed, and the other has a close vote. These have been", "2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current posts where people are asking for lists", "2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1902/shopping-questions-revisited) * And [another from 2015](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2038/defining-shopping-questions) And then we have current posts where", "commercial online service”, [linking to another discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on that specifically. * Here’s an", "its own question. What questions should be closed as “shopping”? * Here’s the", "of software that can be used to teach remotely, in light of the", "we be closing these sorts of questions (if not off scope for another" ]
[ "stating where they point. If you can provide better or complementary answers to", "of individual institutions can only be answered by those institutions and may be", "by curating the lists of relevant questions. If you find any question that", "on the regulations of individual institutions can only be answered by those institutions", "be quickly outdated in light of the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for", "'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here as well. We maintain collections of questions", "find any question that should be referenced here but isn’t, please add it.", "[chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal", "need. Be aware that the following questions are not suited for our site:", "Questions whose answers will be mostly based on speculation about upcoming political and", "general, but please mark them by stating where they point. If you can", "several ways: teaching and exams are moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel is", "* Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/)", "impacts academia in several ways: teaching and exams are moved online, conferences are", "questions, this is also very welcome. You can propose other things we can", "on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling questions can be asked on", "point. If you can provide better or complementary answers to some of the", "of the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. * Questions whose", "is restricted, etc. If you are here because of this, here is a", "anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our", "and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal help. However, to talk", "isn’t, please add it. You can also link relevant resources on other Stack", "is focused and clearly states which information you need. Be aware that the", "referenced here but isn’t, please add it. You can also link relevant resources", "site: * Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology can be asked on [Medical", "can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling questions can", "there, [you need 20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you", "also link relevant resources on other Stack Exchange sites or the Internet in", "suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom", "you can provide better or complementary answers to some of the relevant questions,", "at high schools). * Questions on the regulations of individual institutions can only", "* [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions", "[other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you have a question that is not covered", "of academia (e.g., at high schools). * Questions on the regulations of individual", "[Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions that are", "resources that may help you. ### Finding existing questions We have the tag", "and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you have a", "* Questions on the regulations of individual institutions can only be answered by", "* [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions that", "quickly outdated in light of the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more", "specific about the Corona crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged", "questions are not suited for our site: * Scientific questions on immunology and", "further development of the crisis [are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you", "### New questions If you have a question that is not covered by", "lists of relevant questions. If you find any question that should be referenced", "* [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you have a question that", "relevant questions, this is also very welcome. You can propose other things we", "and the further development of the crisis [are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask)", "'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the Corona crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning", "Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. * Questions whose answers will be", "If you find any question that should be referenced here but isn’t, please", "it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question is focused and clearly states which information", "the following questions are not suited for our site: * Scientific questions on", "here but isn’t, please add it. You can also link relevant resources on", "topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New", "by those institutions and may be quickly outdated in light of the crisis.", "development of the crisis [are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t", "other Stack Exchange sites or the Internet in general, but please mark them", "questions specific about the Corona crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions", "are specific to teaching in those fields or that are about teaching outside", "you. ### Finding existing questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged", "[Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/)", "on other Stack Exchange sites or the Internet in general, but please mark", "sites or the Internet in general, but please mark them by stating where", "this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question is focused and clearly", "more information. * Questions whose answers will be mostly based on speculation about", "may find informal help. However, to talk there, [you need 20 reputation on", "(e.g., at high schools). * Questions on the regulations of individual institutions can", "New questions If you have a question that is not covered by this,", "answers to some of the relevant questions, this is also very welcome. You", "won’t get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have a [chatroom for", "here because of this, here is a brief introduction to our site and", "can only be answered by those institutions and may be quickly outdated in", "a question that is not covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure", "light of the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. * Questions", "Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or", "academia (e.g., at high schools). * Questions on the regulations of individual institutions", "sorted by topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683)", "as well. We maintain collections of questions and external resources sorted by topic:", "should be referenced here but isn’t, please add it. You can also link", "only be answered by those institutions and may be quickly outdated in light", "may help you with questions that are specific to teaching in those fields", "[our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal help. However, to talk there,", "### Contribute If you can, please contribute, in particular by curating the lists", "particular by curating the lists of relevant questions. If you find any question", "learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal help. However, to", "Questions on the regulations of individual institutions can only be answered by those", "We also have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where", "in light of the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. ", "talk there, [you need 20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If", "and epidemiology can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). General travelling", "or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with", "where they point. If you can provide better or complementary answers to some", "outside of academia (e.g., at high schools). * Questions on the regulations of", "cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If you are here because of this, here", "FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. * Questions whose answers will be mostly based on", "schools). * Questions on the regulations of individual institutions can only be answered", "a brief introduction to our site and resources that may help you. ###", "on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help", "you may find informal help. However, to talk there, [you need 20 reputation", "this is also very welcome. You can propose other things we can do", "of relevant questions. If you find any question that should be referenced here", "see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. * Questions whose answers will be mostly", "of this, here is a brief introduction to our site and resources that", "by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question is focused and", "first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can, please contribute, in particular by curating the", "SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions that are specific to", "with questions that are specific to teaching in those fields or that are", "please add it. You can also link relevant resources on other Stack Exchange", "they point. If you can provide better or complementary answers to some of", "or that are about teaching outside of academia (e.g., at high schools). ", "immunology and epidemiology can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). General", "questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the Corona crisis, but older questions", "curating the lists of relevant questions. If you find any question that should", "you with questions that are specific to teaching in those fields or that", "to talk there, [you need 20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute", "the lists of relevant questions. If you find any question that should be", "information you need. Be aware that the following questions are not suited for", "Stack Exchange sites or the Internet in general, but please mark them by", "add it. You can also link relevant resources on other Stack Exchange sites", "tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the Corona crisis,", "upcoming political and administrative decisions and the further development of the crisis [are", "be referenced here but isn’t, please add it. You can also link relevant", "[ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question is focused and clearly states which", "reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can, please contribute, in", "which information you need. Be aware that the following questions are not suited", "questions on immunology and epidemiology can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/).", "If you can, please contribute, in particular by curating the lists of relevant", "questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here as well. We maintain collections", "general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal help. However, to talk there, [you", "apply here as well. We maintain collections of questions and external resources sorted", "COVID-19 crisis impacts academia in several ways: teaching and exams are moved online,", "that are about teaching outside of academia (e.g., at high schools). * Questions", "question that should be referenced here but isn’t, please add it. You can", "ways: teaching and exams are moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted,", "any question that should be referenced here but isn’t, please add it. You", "you find any question that should be referenced here but isn’t, please add", "\"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here as well. We maintain", "If you are here because of this, here is a brief introduction to", "(and you won’t get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have a", "because of this, here is a brief introduction to our site and resources", "and may be quickly outdated in light of the crisis. Please see [this", "the relevant questions, this is also very welcome. You can propose other things", "older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here", "here is a brief introduction to our site and resources that may help", "welcome. You can propose other things we can do as a community [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4673/7734).", "get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have a [chatroom for online", "a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find", "need 20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can, please", "those institutions and may be quickly outdated in light of the crisis. Please", "have a question that is not covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please", "you can, please contribute*, in particular by curating the lists of relevant questions.", "not suited for our site: Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology can", "whose answers will be mostly based on speculation about upcoming political and administrative", "relevant questions. If you find any question that should be referenced here but", "about upcoming political and administrative decisions and the further development of the crisis", "your question is focused and clearly states which information you need. Be aware", "suited for our site: * Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology can be", "clearly states which information you need. Be aware that the following questions are", "the regulations of individual institutions can only be answered by those institutions and", "questions that are specific to teaching in those fields or that are about", "learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you have", "question that is not covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that", "teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you", "by topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ###", "that are specific to teaching in those fields or that are about teaching", "is a brief introduction to our site and resources that may help you.", "exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you have a question", "please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question is focused and clearly states", "in several ways: teaching and exams are moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel", "are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If you are here because of this,", "and exams are moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If", "be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/)", "some of the relevant questions, this is also very welcome. You can propose", "have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may", "information. * Questions whose answers will be mostly based on speculation about upcoming", "of the crisis [are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get", "external resources sorted by topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682)", "you have a question that is not covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/).", "answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and", "site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can, please contribute, in particular by curating", "crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may", "asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling questions can be asked", "maintain collections of questions and external resources sorted by topic: * [remote teaching,", "of the relevant questions, this is also very welcome. You can propose other", "[Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions", "on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can, please contribute, in particular", "by stating where they point. If you can provide better or complementary answers", "the Internet in general, but please mark them by stating where they point.", "The current COVID-19 crisis impacts academia in several ways: teaching and exams are", "Be aware that the following questions are not suited for our site: ", "question is focused and clearly states which information you need. Be aware that", "can provide better or complementary answers to some of the relevant questions, this", "asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may", "Please ensure that your question is focused and clearly states which information you", "specific to teaching in those fields or that are about teaching outside of", "tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here as well. We maintain collections of", "questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific", "If you can provide better or complementary answers to some of the relevant", "\"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the Corona crisis, but older", "or complementary answers to some of the relevant questions, this is also very", "help. However, to talk there, [you need 20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat).", "have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the", "site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have", "Internet in general, but please mark them by stating where they point. If", "online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal help. However,", "also very welcome. You can propose other things we can do as a", "help you with questions that are specific to teaching in those fields or", "* [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you have a question that is not", "[are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good answers anywhere).", "you are here because of this, here is a brief introduction to our", "the further development of the crisis [are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and", "similar may apply here as well. We maintain collections of questions and external", "that your question is focused and clearly states which information you need. Be", "help you. ### Finding existing questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions", "here as well. We maintain collections of questions and external resources sorted by", "and resources that may help you. ### Finding existing questions We have the", "questions If you have a question that is not covered by this, please", "in those fields or that are about teaching outside of academia (e.g., at", "our site and resources that may help you. ### Finding existing questions We", "[you need 20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can,", "the crisis [are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good", "* General travelling questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math", "them by stating where they point. If you can provide better or complementary", "[Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you", "that may help you. ### Finding existing questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19", "to some of the relevant questions, this is also very welcome. You can", "Finding existing questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for", "it. You can also link relevant resources on other Stack Exchange sites or", "and clearly states which information you need. Be aware that the following questions", "[covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the Corona crisis, but", "collections of questions and external resources sorted by topic: * [remote teaching, learning,", "are moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If you are", "be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling questions can be", "outdated in light of the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information.", "for questions specific about the Corona crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show", "those fields or that are about teaching outside of academia (e.g., at high", "the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the Corona", "well. We maintain collections of questions and external resources sorted by topic: ", "[conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If you have a question that is", "the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can, please contribute, in particular by", "of questions and external resources sorted by topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and", "is not covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question", "However, to talk there, [you need 20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ###", "in particular by curating the lists of relevant questions. If you find any", "crisis impacts academia in several ways: teaching and exams are moved online, conferences", "resources sorted by topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) ", "but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply", "or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). General travelling questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/).", "about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here as well.", "can also link relevant resources on other Stack Exchange sites or the Internet", "mostly based on speculation about upcoming political and administrative decisions and the further", "institutions can only be answered by those institutions and may be quickly outdated", "questions and external resources sorted by topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681)", "to teaching in those fields or that are about teaching outside of academia", "may be quickly outdated in light of the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406)", "for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We", "questions. If you find any question that should be referenced here but isn’t,", "We maintain collections of questions and external resources sorted by topic: * [remote", "contribute*, in particular by curating the lists of relevant questions. If you find", "on immunology and epidemiology can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). ", "answers will be mostly based on speculation about upcoming political and administrative decisions", "[this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. * Questions whose answers will be mostly based", "questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and", "that is not covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your", "fields or that are about teaching outside of academia (e.g., at high schools).", "epidemiology can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or [Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling questions", "will be mostly based on speculation about upcoming political and administrative decisions and", "this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also", "can, please contribute, in particular by curating the lists of relevant questions. If", "etc. If you are here because of this, here is a brief introduction", "states which information you need. Be aware that the following questions are not", "provide better or complementary answers to some of the relevant questions, this is", "### Finding existing questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\")", "site and resources that may help you. ### Finding existing questions We have", "the Corona crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and", "focused and clearly states which information you need. Be aware that the following", "and administrative decisions and the further development of the crisis [are not suited", "Contribute If you can, please contribute, in particular by curating the lists of", "in general, but please mark them by stating where they point. If you", "existing questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions", "Chatroom We also have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower)", "informal help. However, to talk there, [you need 20 reputation on the site", "Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions that are specific", "to our site and resources that may help you. ### Finding existing questions", "not covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question is", "individual institutions can only be answered by those institutions and may be quickly", "resources on other Stack Exchange sites or the Internet in general, but please", "restricted, etc. If you are here because of this, here is a brief", "are about teaching outside of academia (e.g., at high schools). * Questions on", "exams are moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If you", "travelling questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/)", "this, here is a brief introduction to our site and resources that may", "but please mark them by stating where they point. If you can provide", "are here because of this, here is a brief introduction to our site", "on speculation about upcoming political and administrative decisions and the further development of", "for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal help.", "please mark them by stating where they point. If you can provide better", "Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions that are specific to teaching in those", "that should be referenced here but isn’t, please add it. You can also", "institutions and may be quickly outdated in light of the crisis. Please see", "We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show questions tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about", "Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology can be asked on [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/) or", "speculation about upcoming political and administrative decisions and the further development of the", "travel is restricted, etc. If you are here because of this, here is", "General travelling questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators", "about the Corona crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\")", "for our site: * Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology can be asked", "teaching in those fields or that are about teaching outside of academia (e.g.,", "the crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. * Questions whose answers", "be answered by those institutions and may be quickly outdated in light of", "administrative decisions and the further development of the crisis [are not suited for", "not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good answers anywhere). ###", "also have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you", "teaching and exams are moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc.", "and external resources sorted by topic: * [remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) ", "political and administrative decisions and the further development of the crisis [are not", "please contribute, in particular by curating the lists of relevant questions. If you", "regulations of individual institutions can only be answered by those institutions and may", "are not suited for our site: Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology", "aware that the following questions are not suited for our site: * Scientific", "teaching outside of academia (e.g., at high schools). * Questions on the regulations", "decisions and the further development of the crisis [are not suited for this", "or the Internet in general, but please mark them by stating where they", "* Questions whose answers will be mostly based on speculation about upcoming political", "link relevant resources on other Stack Exchange sites or the Internet in general,", "be mostly based on speculation about upcoming political and administrative decisions and the", "following questions are not suited for our site: * Scientific questions on immunology", "mark them by stating where they point. If you can provide better or", "and similar may apply here as well. We maintain collections of questions and", "Exchange sites or the Internet in general, but please mark them by stating", "conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If you are here because of", "but isn’t, please add it. You can also link relevant resources on other", "complementary answers to some of the relevant questions, this is also very welcome.", "find informal help. However, to talk there, [you need 20 reputation on the", "introduction to our site and resources that may help you. ### Finding existing", "Corona crisis, but older questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar", "for more information. * Questions whose answers will be mostly based on speculation", "### Chatroom We also have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat) and [our general", "online, conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If you are here because", "20 reputation on the site first](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/chat). ### Contribute If you can, please contribute,", "moved online, conferences are cancelled, travel is restricted, etc. If you are here", "is also very welcome. You can propose other things we can do as", "better or complementary answers to some of the relevant questions, this is also", "very welcome. You can propose other things we can do as a community", "chatroom](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2496/the-ivory-tower) where you may find informal help. However, to talk there, [you need", "that the following questions are not suited for our site: * Scientific questions", "[online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here as well. We", "may help you. ### Finding existing questions We have the tag [covid-19](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/covid-19 \"show", "crisis [are not suited for this site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask) (and you won’t get good answers", "can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). * [Math Educators SE](https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/) and [Computer-Science", "[remote teaching, learning, and exams](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4681) * [conferences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4682) * [other](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4683) ### New questions If", "current COVID-19 crisis impacts academia in several ways: teaching and exams are moved", "you need. Be aware that the following questions are not suited for our", "academia in several ways: teaching and exams are moved online, conferences are cancelled,", "brief introduction to our site and resources that may help you. ### Finding", "relevant resources on other Stack Exchange sites or the Internet in general, but", "may apply here as well. We maintain collections of questions and external resources", "our site: * Scientific questions on immunology and epidemiology can be asked on", "answered by those institutions and may be quickly outdated in light of the", "you won’t get good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have a [chatroom", "[Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions that are specific to teaching in", "covered by this, please [ask it](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/ask/). Please ensure that your question is focused", "questions about [online-learning](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/online-learning \"show questions tagged 'online-learning'\") and similar may apply here as", "tagged 'covid-19'\") for questions specific about the Corona crisis, but older questions about", "If you have a question that is not covered by this, please [ask", "where you may find informal help. However, to talk there, [you need 20", "[Biology](https://biology.stackexchange.com/). * General travelling questions can be asked on [Travel](https://travel.stackexchange.com/) or [Expatriates](https://expatriates.stackexchange.com/). ", "You can also link relevant resources on other Stack Exchange sites or the", "ensure that your question is focused and clearly states which information you need.", "based on speculation about upcoming political and administrative decisions and the further development", "crisis. Please see [this FAQ](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3406) for more information. Questions whose answers will", "and [Computer-Science Educators](https://cseducators.stackexchange.com/) may help you with questions that are specific to teaching", "about teaching outside of academia (e.g., at high schools). * Questions on the", "high schools). * Questions on the regulations of individual institutions can only be", "good answers anywhere). ### Chatroom We also have a [chatroom for online learning](https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/105448/online-learning-chat)" ]
[ "a high quality answer. The accusation of mocking was completely baseless. I would", "quality answer. The accusation of mocking was completely baseless. I would like the", "to the answerer for the personal attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters", "wrong - it was a high quality answer. The accusation of mocking was", "of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should be decided by", "was completely baseless. I would like the moderator to apologize to the answerer", "\"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should be decided by vote. (question edited, I", "the answerer for the personal attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of", "it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason is wrong - it", "indicate the first reason is wrong - it was a high quality answer.", "value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason is wrong", "should be decided by vote. (question edited, I was reading the wrong policy)", "adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers and has no lasting value. Moreover", "for the personal attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality", "a very short answer. The answer had a net 13 upvotes. A moderator", "to the earlier answers and has no lasting value. Moreover it mocks the", "reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers and has no", "net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer giving the reason that \"It", "completely baseless. I would like the moderator to apologize to the answerer for", "The answer had a net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer giving", "was a high quality answer. The accusation of mocking was completely baseless. I", "the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should be decided by vote. (question", "Votes indicate the first reason is wrong - it was a high quality", "asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason is wrong - it was a high", "lasting value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason is", "that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers and has no lasting", "of answer quality should be decided by vote. (question edited, I was reading", "short answer. The answer had a net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the", "had a net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer giving the reason", "high quality answer. The accusation of mocking was completely baseless. I would like", "calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should be decided by vote.", "answer had a net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer giving the", "has no lasting value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the first", "attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should be decided", "the moderator to apologize to the answerer for the personal attack of calling", "first reason is wrong - it was a high quality answer. The accusation", "whatsoever to the earlier answers and has no lasting value. Moreover it mocks", "it was a high quality answer. The accusation of mocking was completely baseless.", "answer. The answer had a net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer", "the asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason is wrong - it was a", "posted a very short answer. The answer had a net 13 upvotes. A", "upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer giving the reason that \"It adds nothing", "answer giving the reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers", "the answer giving the reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier", "deleted the answer giving the reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to the", "quality should be decided by vote. (question edited, I was reading the wrong", "and has no lasting value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the", "answer quality should be decided by vote. (question edited, I was reading the", "Matters of answer quality should be decided by vote. (question edited, I was", "moderator deleted the answer giving the reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to", "accusation of mocking was completely baseless. I would like the moderator to apologize", "answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should be decided by vote. (question edited,", "I would like the moderator to apologize to the answerer for the personal", "The accusation of mocking was completely baseless. I would like the moderator to", "mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason is wrong - it was", "baseless. I would like the moderator to apologize to the answerer for the", "would like the moderator to apologize to the answerer for the personal attack", "mocking was completely baseless. I would like the moderator to apologize to the", "the reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers and has", "no lasting value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason", "the first reason is wrong - it was a high quality answer. The", "reputation user posted a very short answer. The answer had a net 13", "earlier answers and has no lasting value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes", "A low reputation user posted a very short answer. The answer had a", "to apologize to the answerer for the personal attack of calling the answer", "\"It adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers and has no lasting value.", "the earlier answers and has no lasting value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\"", "like the moderator to apologize to the answerer for the personal attack of", "A moderator deleted the answer giving the reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever", "reason is wrong - it was a high quality answer. The accusation of", "13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer giving the reason that \"It adds", "is wrong - it was a high quality answer. The accusation of mocking", "answer. The accusation of mocking was completely baseless. I would like the moderator", "apologize to the answerer for the personal attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\"", "- it was a high quality answer. The accusation of mocking was completely", "giving the reason that \"It adds nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers and", "a net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted the answer giving the reason that", "personal attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should be", "low reputation user posted a very short answer. The answer had a net", "Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate the first reason is wrong -", "answers and has no lasting value. Moreover it mocks the asker.\" Votes indicate", "the personal attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer quality should", "user posted a very short answer. The answer had a net 13 upvotes.", "very short answer. The answer had a net 13 upvotes. A moderator deleted", "nothing whatsoever to the earlier answers and has no lasting value. Moreover it", "of mocking was completely baseless. I would like the moderator to apologize to", "answerer for the personal attack of calling the answer \"mocking.\" Matters of answer", "moderator to apologize to the answerer for the personal attack of calling the" ]
[ "and very beneficial for people who have the same issues. The most voted", "is a valuable question and should not be closed ever. Hence my point;", "graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the answer is based on purely", "considers a very common, and very important thing in academic life is closed", "very beneficial for people who have the same issues. The most voted question", "common problem among academics. Therefore, I believe that it is a valuable question", "their academic career. I believe that his question is highly relevant to academia,", "believe that his question is highly relevant to academia, and very beneficial for", "question and should not be closed ever. Hence my point; Why is a", "advice from people who had similar experience during their academic career. I believe", "academics. Therefore, I believe that it is a valuable question and should not", "very common problem among academics. Therefore, I believe that it is a valuable", "most voted question in this site is [How should I deal with discouragement", "closed ever. Hence my point; Why is a question which considers a very", "academia at 39\" basically asks advice from people who had similar experience during", "who had similar experience during their academic career. I believe that his question", "same issues. The most voted question in this site is [How should I", "important thing in academic life is closed due to the reason being off-topic?", "personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers a very common problem among academics. Therefore,", "I believe that his question is highly relevant to academia, and very beneficial", "the answer is based on purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers a", "site is [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred", "for people who have the same issues. The most voted question in this", "experience, but nevertheless, it considers a very common problem among academics. Therefore, I", "I believe that it is a valuable question and should not be closed", "discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the answer is", "similar experience during their academic career. I believe that his question is highly", "issues. The most voted question in this site is [How should I deal", "[This](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147940/leaving-academia-at-39/1) question entitled as \"Leaving academia at 39\" basically asks advice from people", "is highly relevant to academia, and very beneficial for people who have the", "I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended,", "with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the answer", "it is a valuable question and should not be closed ever. Hence my", "a very common, and very important thing in academic life is closed due", "considers a very common problem among academics. Therefore, I believe that it is", "highly relevant to academia, and very beneficial for people who have the same", "question which considers a very common, and very important thing in academic life", "ever. Hence my point; Why is a question which considers a very common,", "39\" basically asks advice from people who had similar experience during their academic", "that it is a valuable question and should not be closed ever. Hence", "a very common problem among academics. Therefore, I believe that it is a", "point; Why is a question which considers a very common, and very important", "a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the answer is based on", "[How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is", "his question is highly relevant to academia, and very beneficial for people who", "not be closed ever. Hence my point; Why is a question which considers", "it considers a very common problem among academics. Therefore, I believe that it", "is a question which considers a very common, and very important thing in", "this site is [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student).", "very important thing in academic life is closed due to the reason *being", "among academics. Therefore, I believe that it is a valuable question and should", "is absolutely open-ended, the answer is based on purely personal experience, but nevertheless,", "at 39\" basically asks advice from people who had similar experience during their", "academic career. I believe that his question is highly relevant to academia, and", "which considers a very common, and very important thing in academic life is", "question is highly relevant to academia, and very beneficial for people who have", "as \"Leaving academia at 39\" basically asks advice from people who had similar", "be closed ever. Hence my point; Why is a question which considers a", "nevertheless, it considers a very common problem among academics. Therefore, I believe that", "asks advice from people who had similar experience during their academic career. I", "Hence my point; Why is a question which considers a very common, and", "question is absolutely open-ended, the answer is based on purely personal experience, but", "purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers a very common problem among academics.", "relevant to academia, and very beneficial for people who have the same issues.", "career. I believe that his question is highly relevant to academia, and very", "experience during their academic career. I believe that his question is highly relevant", "on purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers a very common problem among", "entitled as \"Leaving academia at 39\" basically asks advice from people who had", "voted question in this site is [How should I deal with discouragement as", "Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the answer is based on purely personal experience,", "valuable question and should not be closed ever. Hence my point; Why is", "should not be closed ever. Hence my point; Why is a question which", "from people who had similar experience during their academic career. I believe that", "is [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question", "people who had similar experience during their academic career. I believe that his", "and very important thing in academic life is closed due to the reason", "as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the answer is based", "answer is based on purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers a very", "Why is a question which considers a very common, and very important thing", "student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the answer is based on purely personal", "basically asks advice from people who had similar experience during their academic career.", "believe that it is a valuable question and should not be closed ever.", "should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely", "deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student). Referred question is absolutely open-ended, the", "academia, and very beneficial for people who have the same issues. The most", "that his question is highly relevant to academia, and very beneficial for people", "my point; Why is a question which considers a very common, and very", "in this site is [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate", "but nevertheless, it considers a very common problem among academics. Therefore, I believe", "is based on purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers a very common", "The most voted question in this site is [How should I deal with", "question in this site is [How should I deal with discouragement as a", "Therefore, I believe that it is a valuable question and should not be", "very common, and very important thing in academic life is closed due to", "a valuable question and should not be closed ever. Hence my point; Why", "beneficial for people who have the same issues. The most voted question in", "people who have the same issues. The most voted question in this site", "the same issues. The most voted question in this site is [How should", "open-ended, the answer is based on purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers", "who have the same issues. The most voted question in this site is", "common, and very important thing in academic life is closed due to the", "absolutely open-ended, the answer is based on purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it", "during their academic career. I believe that his question is highly relevant to", "and should not be closed ever. Hence my point; Why is a question", "question entitled as \"Leaving academia at 39\" basically asks advice from people who", "based on purely personal experience, but nevertheless, it considers a very common problem", "have the same issues. The most voted question in this site is [How", "a question which considers a very common, and very important thing in academic", "had similar experience during their academic career. I believe that his question is", "problem among academics. Therefore, I believe that it is a valuable question and", "\"Leaving academia at 39\" basically asks advice from people who had similar experience", "to academia, and very beneficial for people who have the same issues. The" ]
[ "Is there a way we can direct these askers to appropriate help? I", "question when you are distressed. Is there a way we can direct these", "distressed. Is there a way we can direct these askers to appropriate help?", "these askers to appropriate help? I think it's pretty clear this site is", "way we can direct these askers to appropriate help? I think it's pretty", "people who describe symptoms of depression or anxiety. These are very common mental", "sense. It's hard to ask a good question when you are distressed. Is", "depression or anxiety. These are very common mental health problems. Some askers explicitly", "imply it. Often, but not always, these questions are closed as unclear. This", "they are depressed or anxious and it is disrupting their lives. Others only", "Often, but not always, these questions are closed as unclear. This makes sense.", "is disrupting their lives. Others only imply it. Often, but not always, these", "direct these askers to appropriate help? I think it's pretty clear this site", "questions are closed as unclear. This makes sense. It's hard to ask a", "We regularly get questions from people who describe symptoms of depression or anxiety.", "ask a good question when you are distressed. Is there a way we", "askers to appropriate help? I think it's pretty clear this site is not", "only imply it. Often, but not always, these questions are closed as unclear.", "good question when you are distressed. Is there a way we can direct", "who describe symptoms of depression or anxiety. These are very common mental health", "it is disrupting their lives. Others only imply it. Often, but not always,", "a way we can direct these askers to appropriate help? I think it's", "problems. Some askers explicitly say they are depressed or anxious and it is", "or anxious and it is disrupting their lives. Others only imply it. Often,", "explicitly say they are depressed or anxious and it is disrupting their lives.", "or anxiety. These are very common mental health problems. Some askers explicitly say", "disrupting their lives. Others only imply it. Often, but not always, these questions", "help? I think it's pretty clear this site is not the help these", "there a way we can direct these askers to appropriate help? I think", "anxiety. These are very common mental health problems. Some askers explicitly say they", "very common mental health problems. Some askers explicitly say they are depressed or", "symptoms of depression or anxiety. These are very common mental health problems. Some", "to appropriate help? I think it's pretty clear this site is not the", "from people who describe symptoms of depression or anxiety. These are very common", "hard to ask a good question when you are distressed. Is there a", "of depression or anxiety. These are very common mental health problems. Some askers", "are closed as unclear. This makes sense. It's hard to ask a good", "It's hard to ask a good question when you are distressed. Is there", "Some askers explicitly say they are depressed or anxious and it is disrupting", "unclear. This makes sense. It's hard to ask a good question when you", "askers explicitly say they are depressed or anxious and it is disrupting their", "This makes sense. It's hard to ask a good question when you are", "their lives. Others only imply it. Often, but not always, these questions are", "you are distressed. Is there a way we can direct these askers to", "mental health problems. Some askers explicitly say they are depressed or anxious and", "are depressed or anxious and it is disrupting their lives. Others only imply", "and it is disrupting their lives. Others only imply it. Often, but not", "Others only imply it. Often, but not always, these questions are closed as", "it. Often, but not always, these questions are closed as unclear. This makes", "describe symptoms of depression or anxiety. These are very common mental health problems.", "get questions from people who describe symptoms of depression or anxiety. These are", "health problems. Some askers explicitly say they are depressed or anxious and it", "These are very common mental health problems. Some askers explicitly say they are", "not always, these questions are closed as unclear. This makes sense. It's hard", "are very common mental health problems. Some askers explicitly say they are depressed", "can direct these askers to appropriate help? I think it's pretty clear this", "to ask a good question when you are distressed. Is there a way", "a good question when you are distressed. Is there a way we can", "as unclear. This makes sense. It's hard to ask a good question when", "when you are distressed. Is there a way we can direct these askers", "closed as unclear. This makes sense. It's hard to ask a good question", "we can direct these askers to appropriate help? I think it's pretty clear", "depressed or anxious and it is disrupting their lives. Others only imply it.", "anxious and it is disrupting their lives. Others only imply it. Often, but", "makes sense. It's hard to ask a good question when you are distressed.", "I think it's pretty clear this site is not the help these askers", "common mental health problems. Some askers explicitly say they are depressed or anxious", "appropriate help? I think it's pretty clear this site is not the help", "are distressed. Is there a way we can direct these askers to appropriate", "always, these questions are closed as unclear. This makes sense. It's hard to", "but not always, these questions are closed as unclear. This makes sense. It's", "think it's pretty clear this site is not the help these askers need.", "these questions are closed as unclear. This makes sense. It's hard to ask", "questions from people who describe symptoms of depression or anxiety. These are very", "regularly get questions from people who describe symptoms of depression or anxiety. These", "lives. Others only imply it. Often, but not always, these questions are closed", "say they are depressed or anxious and it is disrupting their lives. Others" ]
[ "the queue. While this question is on a series of claims, which would", "by me) do focus on this factual correctness and why such anecdotal claims", "in the close queue, [receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed", "only closed from votes cast outside the queue. While this question is on", "most of its answers are arguably less subjective than many on this site.", "for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to be", "one by me) do focus on this factual correctness and why such anecdotal", "actually failed to be closed in the close queue, [receiving three leave open", "subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and most of its answers are arguably less", "a series of claims, which would make an opinionated answer, it asks for", "consider this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and most", "objective. Most answers to this question (including one by me) do focus on", "mostly objective. Most answers to this question (including one by me) do focus", "do focus on this factual correctness and why such anecdotal claims are problematic.", "are problematic. While there is still some subjectivity left, I would consider this", "answer, it asks for their correctness, which is mostly objective. Most answers to", "which would make an opinionated answer, it asks for their correctness, which is", "than many on this site. I therefore propose to reopen it. (I cannot", "for being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to be closed in the close", "on a series of claims, which would make an opinionated answer, it asks", "which is mostly objective. Most answers to this question (including one by me)", "Germany as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily opinion-based.", "(including one by me) do focus on this factual correctness and why such", "is still some subjectivity left, I would consider this a case of [good", "are arguably less subjective than many on this site. I therefore propose to", "and most of its answers are arguably less subjective than many on this", "and was only closed from votes cast outside the queue. While this question", "such anecdotal claims are problematic. While there is still some subjectivity left, I", "votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from votes cast outside the queue. While this", "[good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and most of its answers are arguably", "reopen it. (I cannot push this question to the reopen queue, because my", "focus on this factual correctness and why such anecdotal claims are problematic. While", "I would consider this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question", "this site. I therefore propose to reopen it. (I cannot push this question", "[Is this statement on doing a PhD in Germany as a foreigner accurate", "I therefore propose to reopen it. (I cannot push this question to the", "a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily opinion-based. It actually", "open* votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from votes cast outside the queue. While", "their correctness, which is mostly objective. Most answers to this question (including one", "correctness and why such anecdotal claims are problematic. While there is still some", "claims are problematic. While there is still some subjectivity left, I would consider", "arguably less subjective than many on this site. I therefore propose to reopen", "opinion-based. It actually failed to be closed in the close queue, [receiving three", "primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to be closed in the close queue, [receiving", "push this question to the reopen queue, because my vote would immediately reopen", "correctness, which is mostly objective. Most answers to this question (including one by", "close queue, [receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from votes", "why such anecdotal claims are problematic. While there is still some subjectivity left,", "answers are arguably less subjective than many on this site. I therefore propose", "closed in the close queue, [receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only", "in Germany as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily", "on this site. I therefore propose to reopen it. (I cannot push this", "was closed for being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to be closed in", "series of claims, which would make an opinionated answer, it asks for their", "doing a PhD in Germany as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed", "a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and most of its", "left, I would consider this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the", "this question (including one by me) do focus on this factual correctness and", "closed for being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to be closed in the", "still some subjectivity left, I would consider this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/)", "asks for their correctness, which is mostly objective. Most answers to this question", "cannot push this question to the reopen queue, because my vote would immediately", "to this question (including one by me) do focus on this factual correctness", "was only closed from votes cast outside the queue. While this question is", "be closed in the close queue, [receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was", "the close queue, [receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from", "foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed", "this question is on a series of claims, which would make an opinionated", "there is still some subjectivity left, I would consider this a case of", "to be closed in the close queue, [receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and", "for their correctness, which is mostly objective. Most answers to this question (including", "failed to be closed in the close queue, [receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975),", "factual correctness and why such anecdotal claims are problematic. While there is still", "and it the question and most of its answers are arguably less subjective", "the question and most of its answers are arguably less subjective than many", "from votes cast outside the queue. While this question is on a series", "many on this site. I therefore propose to reopen it. (I cannot push", "Most answers to this question (including one by me) do focus on this", "three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from votes cast outside the", "problematic. While there is still some subjectivity left, I would consider this a", "While this question is on a series of claims, which would make an", "would make an opinionated answer, it asks for their correctness, which is mostly", "opinionated answer, it asks for their correctness, which is mostly objective. Most answers", "some subjectivity left, I would consider this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and", "therefore propose to reopen it. (I cannot push this question to the reopen", "mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to be closed", "leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from votes cast outside the queue.", "PhD in Germany as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being", "an opinionated answer, it asks for their correctness, which is mostly objective. Most", "it the question and most of its answers are arguably less subjective than", "answers to this question (including one by me) do focus on this factual", "as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily opinion-based. It", "this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and most of", "question and most of its answers are arguably less subjective than many on", "is mostly objective. Most answers to this question (including one by me) do", "of its answers are arguably less subjective than many on this site. I", "this question to the reopen queue, because my vote would immediately reopen it.)", "While there is still some subjectivity left, I would consider this a case", "this statement on doing a PhD in Germany as a foreigner accurate for", "a PhD in Germany as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for", "it asks for their correctness, which is mostly objective. Most answers to this", "outside the queue. While this question is on a series of claims, which", "subjective than many on this site. I therefore propose to reopen it. (I", "(I cannot push this question to the reopen queue, because my vote would", "is on a series of claims, which would make an opinionated answer, it", "being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to be closed in the close queue,", "and why such anecdotal claims are problematic. While there is still some subjectivity", "would consider this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and", "of claims, which would make an opinionated answer, it asks for their correctness,", "claims, which would make an opinionated answer, it asks for their correctness, which", "cast outside the queue. While this question is on a series of claims,", "anecdotal claims are problematic. While there is still some subjectivity left, I would", "case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and most of its answers", "me) do focus on this factual correctness and why such anecdotal claims are", "votes cast outside the queue. While this question is on a series of", "on this factual correctness and why such anecdotal claims are problematic. While there", "closed from votes cast outside the queue. While this question is on a", "statement on doing a PhD in Germany as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734)", "it. (I cannot push this question to the reopen queue, because my vote", "this factual correctness and why such anecdotal claims are problematic. While there is", "its answers are arguably less subjective than many on this site. I therefore", "propose to reopen it. (I cannot push this question to the reopen queue,", "It actually failed to be closed in the close queue, [receiving three leave", "question is on a series of claims, which would make an opinionated answer,", "[receiving three leave open* votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from votes cast outside", "queue. While this question is on a series of claims, which would make", "accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was closed for being primarily opinion-based. It actually failed to", "question (including one by me) do focus on this factual correctness and why", "less subjective than many on this site. I therefore propose to reopen it.", "to reopen it. (I cannot push this question to the reopen queue, because", "on doing a PhD in Germany as a foreigner accurate for mathematics?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/144960/7734) was", "make an opinionated answer, it asks for their correctness, which is mostly objective.", "site. I therefore propose to reopen it. (I cannot push this question to", "subjectivity left, I would consider this a case of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it", "of [good subjective](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/) and it the question and most of its answers are", "queue, [receiving three leave open votes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/review/close/84975), and was only closed from votes cast" ]
[ "you not ask us earlier? =============================== The new texts should not contain any", "that informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the close reason should be", "text that works on all occasions anymore and have more room for tailored", "the question or guide the asker. For example, this is what the author", "With [recent changes to the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the texts", "should be used. * One brief text that describes the close reason to", "worked together with the other moderators to make use of this system. The", "The changes retroactively apply to old questions closed with the respective predecessor close", "we can now tailor the texts for custom close reasons to different audiences:", "to have you review the result in place, and suggest changes if necessary.", "to make use of this system. The new close reasons went active just", "now. The changes retroactively apply to old questions closed with the respective predecessor", "guide the asker. For example, this is what the author of a question", "is rather difficult to grasp which text goes where without seeing the result", "* One brief text that describes the close reason to everybody seeing the", "of this system. The new close reasons went active just now. The changes", "which text goes where without seeing the result in action; I got a", "Please use comments to suggest improvements and similar. Should any complex issues or", "if necessary. This question ============= I’ll post one answer for each of our", "shown in the two following cases.) * One text to guide the author", "make use of this system. The new close reasons went active just now.", "the result being accidentally worse than the status quo. Also, it is rather", "existing policy. Since there is more room and the texts are more targetted,", "went active just now. The changes retroactively apply to old questions closed with", "review the result in place, and suggest changes if necessary. This question =============", "a single text that works on all occasions anymore and have more room", "the texts are more targetted, there is little risk of the result being", "Should any complex issues or disagreements arise, I will create separate questions as", "more welcoming. What happened ============= I worked together with the other moderators to", "new texts should not contain any surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since there", "the question. (It also gets shown in the two following cases.) * One", "result being accidentally worse than the status quo. Also, it is rather difficult", "see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great since we do not", "For example, this is what the author of a question closed as not", "texts should not contain any surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since there is", "our custom close reasons containing all the texts. Please use comments to suggest", "contain any surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since there is more room and", "this is great since we do not have to have a single text", "the two following cases.) One text to guide the author of a", "to have a single text that works on all occasions anymore and have", "I got a few things wrong at first myself. I therefore considered it", "to grasp which text goes where without seeing the result in action; I", "the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question or guide the asker. For", "since we do not have to have a single text that works on", "============= I’ll post one answer for each of our custom close reasons containing", "respective predecessor close reason. Why did you not ask us earlier? =============================== The", "the scope of this community* will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this", "old questions closed with the respective predecessor close reason. Why did you not", "notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great since we do not have to have", "asker. For example, this is what the author of a question closed as", "reason should be used. * One brief text that describes the close reason", "changes if necessary. This question ============= I’ll post one answer for each of", "should not contain any surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since there is more", "now tailor the texts for custom close reasons to different audiences: * One", "reason to everybody seeing the question. (It also gets shown in the two", "and similar. Should any complex issues or disagreements arise, I will create separate", "text to guide the author of a question with improving it, getting help", "without seeing the result in action; I got a few things wrong at", "for custom close reasons to different audiences: * One text that informs close", "the result in place, and suggest changes if necessary. This question ============= I’ll", "the asker. For example, this is what the author of a question closed", "guide the author of a question with improving it, getting help elsewhere, or", "guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question or guide", "ask us earlier? =============================== The new texts should not contain any surprises; they", "texts for custom close reasons to different audiences: * One text that informs", "within the scope of this community* will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think", "with the other moderators to make use of this system. The new close", "new close reasons went active just now. The changes retroactively apply to old", "of our custom close reasons containing all the texts. Please use comments to", "all the texts. Please use comments to suggest improvements and similar. Should any", "informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the close reason should be used.", "the texts for custom close reasons to different audiences: * One text that", "they reflect existing policy. Since there is more room and the texts are", "and reviewers when the close reason should be used. * One brief text", "little risk of the result being accidentally worse than the status quo. Also,", "improving it, getting help elsewhere, or similar. * One text to guide users", "tailored guidance and being more welcoming. What happened ============= I worked together with", "to suggest improvements and similar. Should any complex issues or disagreements arise, I", "I think this is great since we do not have to have a", "close reasons to different audiences: * One text that informs close flaggers, voters,", "it, getting help elsewhere, or similar. * One text to guide users with", "close reason. Why did you not ask us earlier? =============================== The new texts", "question closed as not within the scope of this community will see: [![example", "not have to have a single text that works on all occasions anymore", "welcoming. What happened ============= I worked together with the other moderators to make", "the other moderators to make use of this system. The new close reasons", "questions closed with the respective predecessor close reason. Why did you not ask", "close reasons went active just now. The changes retroactively apply to old questions", "closed with the respective predecessor close reason. Why did you not ask us", "[close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question or guide the asker. For example,", "the result in action; I got a few things wrong at first myself.", "to guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question or", "goes where without seeing the result in action; I got a few things", "have you review the result in place, and suggest changes if necessary. This", "One text that informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the close reason", "question or guide the asker. For example, this is what the author of", "it better to have you review the result in place, and suggest changes", "more targetted, there is little risk of the result being accidentally worse than", "the author of a question with improving it, getting help elsewhere, or similar.", "to improve the question or guide the asker. For example, this is what", "one answer for each of our custom close reasons containing all the texts.", "action; I got a few things wrong at first myself. I therefore considered", "this system. The new close reasons went active just now. The changes retroactively", "comments to suggest improvements and similar. Should any complex issues or disagreements arise,", "scope of this community* will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is", "to the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the texts for custom close", "help elsewhere, or similar. * One text to guide users with the [close", "to everybody seeing the question. (It also gets shown in the two following", "few things wrong at first myself. I therefore considered it better to have", "of the result being accidentally worse than the status quo. Also, it is", "not within the scope of this community will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I", "to old questions closed with the respective predecessor close reason. Why did you", "* One text to guide the author of a question with improving it,", "seeing the question. (It also gets shown in the two following cases.) ", "reflect existing policy. Since there is more room and the texts are more", "moderators to make use of this system. The new close reasons went active", "result in action; I got a few things wrong at first myself. I", "reasons went active just now. The changes retroactively apply to old questions closed", "together with the other moderators to make use of this system. The new", "not contain any surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since there is more room", "any surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since there is more room and the", "question ============= I’ll post one answer for each of our custom close reasons", "active just now. The changes retroactively apply to old questions closed with the", "us earlier? =============================== The new texts should not contain any surprises; they reflect", "is what the author of a question closed as not within the scope", "predecessor close reason. Why did you not ask us earlier? =============================== The new", "where without seeing the result in action; I got a few things wrong", "suggest improvements and similar. Should any complex issues or disagreements arise, I will", "we do not have to have a single text that works on all", "reasons to different audiences: * One text that informs close flaggers, voters, and", "reason. Why did you not ask us earlier? =============================== The new texts should", "a few things wrong at first myself. I therefore considered it better to", "what the author of a question closed as not within the scope of", "text to guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question", "following cases.) One text to guide the author of a question with", "is little risk of the result being accidentally worse than the status quo.", "be used. * One brief text that describes the close reason to everybody", "have a single text that works on all occasions anymore and have more", "Background ========== With [recent changes to the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor", "being accidentally worse than the status quo. Also, it is rather difficult to", "got a few things wrong at first myself. I therefore considered it better", "close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great since we do not have to", "answer for each of our custom close reasons containing all the texts. Please", "the texts. Please use comments to suggest improvements and similar. Should any complex", "This question ============= I’ll post one answer for each of our custom close", "quo. Also, it is rather difficult to grasp which text goes where without", "[recent changes to the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the texts for", "apply to old questions closed with the respective predecessor close reason. Why did", "cases.) * One text to guide the author of a question with improving", "there is more room and the texts are more targetted, there is little", "question with improving it, getting help elsewhere, or similar. * One text to", "it is rather difficult to grasp which text goes where without seeing the", "things wrong at first myself. I therefore considered it better to have you", "improvements and similar. Should any complex issues or disagreements arise, I will create", "two following cases.) * One text to guide the author of a question", "difficult to grasp which text goes where without seeing the result in action;", "with improving it, getting help elsewhere, or similar. * One text to guide", "changes retroactively apply to old questions closed with the respective predecessor close reason.", "surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since there is more room and the texts", "or guide the asker. For example, this is what the author of a", "this community* will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great since", "custom close reasons containing all the texts. Please use comments to suggest improvements", "the close reason should be used. * One brief text that describes the", "Also, it is rather difficult to grasp which text goes where without seeing", "necessary. This question ============= I’ll post one answer for each of our custom", "this is what the author of a question closed as not within the", "you review the result in place, and suggest changes if necessary. This question", "audiences: One text that informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the", "guidance and being more welcoming. What happened ============= I worked together with the", "any complex issues or disagreements arise, I will create separate questions as needed.", "use comments to suggest improvements and similar. Should any complex issues or disagreements", "not ask us earlier? =============================== The new texts should not contain any surprises;", "reviewers when the close reason should be used. * One brief text that", "One brief text that describes the close reason to everybody seeing the question.", "similar. Should any complex issues or disagreements arise, I will create separate questions", "users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question or guide the", "custom close reasons to different audiences: * One text that informs close flaggers,", "of a question closed as not within the scope of this community will", "suggest changes if necessary. This question ============= I’ll post one answer for each", "occasions anymore and have more room for tailored guidance and being more welcoming.", "other moderators to make use of this system. The new close reasons went", "risk of the result being accidentally worse than the status quo. Also, it", "at first myself. I therefore considered it better to have you review the", "being more welcoming. What happened ============= I worked together with the other moderators", "a question with improving it, getting help elsewhere, or similar. * One text", "close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the close reason should be used. ", "how to improve the question or guide the asker. For example, this is", "gets shown in the two following cases.) One text to guide the", "and the texts are more targetted, there is little risk of the result", "use of this system. The new close reasons went active just now. The", "The new close reasons went active just now. The changes retroactively apply to", "first myself. I therefore considered it better to have you review the result", "think this is great since we do not have to have a single", "[![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great since we do not have", "happened ============= I worked together with the other moderators to make use of", "for tailored guidance and being more welcoming. What happened ============= I worked together", "when the close reason should be used. * One brief text that describes", "(It also gets shown in the two following cases.) * One text to", "result in place, and suggest changes if necessary. This question ============= I’ll post", "the author of a question closed as not within the scope of this", "all occasions anymore and have more room for tailored guidance and being more", "with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question or guide the asker.", "system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the texts for custom close reasons to different", "of a question with improving it, getting help elsewhere, or similar. One", "============= I worked together with the other moderators to make use of this", "or similar. * One text to guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how", "elsewhere, or similar. * One text to guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions)", "One text to guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the", "describes the close reason to everybody seeing the question. (It also gets shown", "everybody seeing the question. (It also gets shown in the two following cases.)", "getting help elsewhere, or similar. * One text to guide users with the", "the status quo. Also, it is rather difficult to grasp which text goes", "Since there is more room and the texts are more targetted, there is", "community* will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great since we", "the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the texts for custom close reasons", "status quo. Also, it is rather difficult to grasp which text goes where", "What happened ============= I worked together with the other moderators to make use", "the respective predecessor close reason. Why did you not ask us earlier? ===============================", "as not within the scope of this community will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)", "to guide the author of a question with improving it, getting help elsewhere,", "=============================== The new texts should not contain any surprises; they reflect existing policy.", "is great since we do not have to have a single text that", "author of a question closed as not within the scope of this community", "I therefore considered it better to have you review the result in place,", "works on all occasions anymore and have more room for tailored guidance and", "voters, and reviewers when the close reason should be used. * One brief", "therefore considered it better to have you review the result in place, and", "question. (It also gets shown in the two following cases.) * One text", "will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great since we do", "One text to guide the author of a question with improving it, getting", "to different audiences: * One text that informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers", "wrong at first myself. I therefore considered it better to have you review", "room for tailored guidance and being more welcoming. What happened ============= I worked", "* One text to guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve", "text goes where without seeing the result in action; I got a few", "room and the texts are more targetted, there is little risk of the", "in the two following cases.) * One text to guide the author of", "accidentally worse than the status quo. Also, it is rather difficult to grasp", "did you not ask us earlier? =============================== The new texts should not contain", "just now. The changes retroactively apply to old questions closed with the respective", "anymore and have more room for tailored guidance and being more welcoming. What", "can now tailor the texts for custom close reasons to different audiences: ", "seeing the result in action; I got a few things wrong at first", "in place, and suggest changes if necessary. This question ============= I’ll post one", "improve the question or guide the asker. For example, this is what the", "myself. I therefore considered it better to have you review the result in", "considered it better to have you review the result in place, and suggest", "single text that works on all occasions anymore and have more room for", "I’ll post one answer for each of our custom close reasons containing all", "rather difficult to grasp which text goes where without seeing the result in", "author of a question with improving it, getting help elsewhere, or similar. ", "changes to the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the texts for custom", "have more room for tailored guidance and being more welcoming. What happened =============", "Why did you not ask us earlier? =============================== The new texts should not", "the close reason to everybody seeing the question. (It also gets shown in", "post one answer for each of our custom close reasons containing all the", "earlier? =============================== The new texts should not contain any surprises; they reflect existing", "similar. * One text to guide users with the [close privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to", "I worked together with the other moderators to make use of this system.", "example, this is what the author of a question closed as not within", "and being more welcoming. What happened ============= I worked together with the other", "worse than the status quo. Also, it is rather difficult to grasp which", "and suggest changes if necessary. This question ============= I’ll post one answer for", "different audiences: One text that informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when", "with the respective predecessor close reason. Why did you not ask us earlier?", "brief text that describes the close reason to everybody seeing the question. (It", "targetted, there is little risk of the result being accidentally worse than the", "closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the texts for custom close reasons to", "retroactively apply to old questions closed with the respective predecessor close reason. Why", "containing all the texts. Please use comments to suggest improvements and similar. Should", "on all occasions anymore and have more room for tailored guidance and being", "place, and suggest changes if necessary. This question ============= I’ll post one answer", "privilege](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/privileges/close-questions) how to improve the question or guide the asker. For example, this", "texts. Please use comments to suggest improvements and similar. Should any complex issues", "flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the close reason should be used. * One", "in action; I got a few things wrong at first myself. I therefore", "is more room and the texts are more targetted, there is little risk", "text that describes the close reason to everybody seeing the question. (It also", "do not have to have a single text that works on all occasions", "of this community* will see: [![example close notice](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/vrPG1.png) I think this is great", "have to have a single text that works on all occasions anymore and", "that describes the close reason to everybody seeing the question. (It also gets", "a question closed as not within the scope of this community will see:", "there is little risk of the result being accidentally worse than the status", "for each of our custom close reasons containing all the texts. Please use", "The new texts should not contain any surprises; they reflect existing policy. Since", "great since we do not have to have a single text that works", "system. The new close reasons went active just now. The changes retroactively apply", "better to have you review the result in place, and suggest changes if", "close reasons containing all the texts. Please use comments to suggest improvements and", "used. * One brief text that describes the close reason to everybody seeing", "more room for tailored guidance and being more welcoming. What happened ============= I", "more room and the texts are more targetted, there is little risk of", "tailor the texts for custom close reasons to different audiences: * One text", "reasons containing all the texts. Please use comments to suggest improvements and similar.", "text that informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the close reason should", "that works on all occasions anymore and have more room for tailored guidance", "texts are more targetted, there is little risk of the result being accidentally", "each of our custom close reasons containing all the texts. Please use comments", "closed as not within the scope of this community will see: [![example close", "also gets shown in the two following cases.) * One text to guide", "policy. Since there is more room and the texts are more targetted, there", "close reason should be used. * One brief text that describes the close", "than the status quo. Also, it is rather difficult to grasp which text", "* One text that informs close flaggers, voters, and reviewers when the close", "and have more room for tailored guidance and being more welcoming. What happened", "close reason to everybody seeing the question. (It also gets shown in the", "are more targetted, there is little risk of the result being accidentally worse", "grasp which text goes where without seeing the result in action; I got", "========== With [recent changes to the closing system](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/346638/255554), we can now tailor the" ]
[ "the answer is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The OP needs", "few questions get asked that don't require much thought or analysis to answer.", "all are like that. And many of these sorts of questions seem to", "few of these in comments lately and would like advice on the validity.", "for a future reader. Not all are like that. And many of these", "is anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a few of these in", "to answer. Often the answer is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\".", "but the question is anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a few", "question or close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't", "this one may be a the limit of where a real \"answer\" could", "a future reader. Not all are like that. And many of these sorts", "some help but the question is anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite", "or \"contact that journal\". The OP needs some help but the question is", "unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to be a really appropriate listed", "the validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions seems like overkill.", "may have fallen into a bad habit. A few questions get asked that", "I may have fallen into a bad habit. A few questions get asked", "questions get asked that don't require much thought or analysis to answer. Often", "questions seems like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though", "personal and may have little value for a future reader. Not all are", "really fine to answer in comments for such things. The alternative might be", "it really fine to answer in comments for such things. The alternative might", "a the limit of where a real \"answer\" could be given. Some of", "a real \"answer\" could be given. Some of the questions of this kind", "Some of the questions of this kind are personal and may have little", "help but the question is anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a", "to answer in comments for such things. The alternative might be to just", "be to just ignore the question or close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied", "needs some help but the question is anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\"", "to be a really appropriate listed \"reason to close\" for many of these.", "is it really fine to answer in comments for such things. The alternative", "a question, though this one may be a the limit of where a", "get asked that don't require much thought or analysis to answer. Often the", "advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The OP needs some help but the question", "many of these sorts of questions seem to be coming from new users.", "sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions seems like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368)", "asked that don't require much thought or analysis to answer. Often the answer", "quite a few of these in comments lately and would like advice on", "the question or close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there", "and may have little value for a future reader. Not all are like", "in comments for such things. The alternative might be to just ignore the", "anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a few of these in comments", "\"answering\" quite a few of these in comments lately and would like advice", "comments lately and would like advice on the validity. A one sentence \"formal", "coming from new users. So, assuming that there isn't really much to say", "might be to just ignore the question or close it, leaving the OP", "a few of these in comments lately and would like advice on the", "of questions seem to be coming from new users. So, assuming that there", "much to say and the \"answer\" is very short, is it really fine", "these sorts of questions seem to be coming from new users. So, assuming", "answer is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The OP needs some", "alternative might be to just ignore the question or close it, leaving the", "of this kind are personal and may have little value for a future", "are like that. And many of these sorts of questions seem to be", "is very short, is it really fine to answer in comments for such", "an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though this one may be a the", "\"answer\" is very short, is it really fine to answer in comments for", "Not all are like that. And many of these sorts of questions seem", "seem to be coming from new users. So, assuming that there isn't really", "may have little value for a future reader. Not all are like that.", "one may be a the limit of where a real \"answer\" could be", "require much thought or analysis to answer. Often the answer is \"ask your", "really much to say and the \"answer\" is very short, is it really", "that journal\". The OP needs some help but the question is anything but", "these in comments lately and would like advice on the validity. A one", "of the questions of this kind are personal and may have little value", "validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions seems like overkill. [Here", "may be a the limit of where a real \"answer\" could be given.", "the questions of this kind are personal and may have little value for", "close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to", "this kind are personal and may have little value for a future reader.", "into a bad habit. A few questions get asked that don't require much", "seem to be a really appropriate listed \"reason to close\" for many of", "would like advice on the validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\" to such", "fine to answer in comments for such things. The alternative might be to", "bad habit. A few questions get asked that don't require much thought or", "advice on the validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions seems", "So, assuming that there isn't really much to say and the \"answer\" is", "answer\" to such questions seems like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such", "comments for such things. The alternative might be to just ignore the question", "A few questions get asked that don't require much thought or analysis to", "questions of this kind are personal and may have little value for a", "sorts of questions seem to be coming from new users. So, assuming that", "in comments lately and would like advice on the validity. A one sentence", "have fallen into a bad habit. A few questions get asked that don't", "overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though this one may", "habit. A few questions get asked that don't require much thought or analysis", "seems like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though this", "doesn't seem to be a really appropriate listed \"reason to close\" for many", "real \"answer\" could be given. Some of the questions of this kind are", "like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though this one", "though this one may be a the limit of where a real \"answer\"", "analysis to answer. Often the answer is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that", "be coming from new users. So, assuming that there isn't really much to", "are personal and may have little value for a future reader. Not all", "or close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem", "leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to be a", "users. So, assuming that there isn't really much to say and the \"answer\"", "that. And many of these sorts of questions seem to be coming from", "a bad habit. A few questions get asked that don't require much thought", "kind are personal and may have little value for a future reader. Not", "is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The OP needs some help", "have little value for a future reader. Not all are like that. And", "\"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The OP needs some help but", "little value for a future reader. Not all are like that. And many", "reader. Not all are like that. And many of these sorts of questions", "to such questions seems like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a", "such questions seems like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question,", "limit of where a real \"answer\" could be given. Some of the questions", "it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to be", "and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to be a really appropriate listed \"reason", "that don't require much thought or analysis to answer. Often the answer is", "value for a future reader. Not all are like that. And many of", "there doesn't seem to be a really appropriate listed \"reason to close\" for", "The OP needs some help but the question is anything but earth-shattering. I've", "I've been \"answering\" quite a few of these in comments lately and would", "short, is it really fine to answer in comments for such things. The", "fallen into a bad habit. A few questions get asked that don't require", "answer in comments for such things. The alternative might be to just ignore", "of these sorts of questions seem to be coming from new users. So,", "isn't really much to say and the \"answer\" is very short, is it", "things. The alternative might be to just ignore the question or close it,", "or analysis to answer. Often the answer is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact", "one sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions seems like overkill. [Here is an", "of where a real \"answer\" could be given. Some of the questions of", "question is anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a few of these", "to be coming from new users. So, assuming that there isn't really much", "and the \"answer\" is very short, is it really fine to answer in", "to say and the \"answer\" is very short, is it really fine to", "where a real \"answer\" could be given. Some of the questions of this", "And many of these sorts of questions seem to be coming from new", "is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though this one may be a", "the \"answer\" is very short, is it really fine to answer in comments", "answer. Often the answer is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The", "OP needs some help but the question is anything but earth-shattering. I've been", "earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a few of these in comments lately and", "given. Some of the questions of this kind are personal and may have", "The alternative might be to just ignore the question or close it, leaving", "just ignore the question or close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy.", "for such things. The alternative might be to just ignore the question or", "like that. And many of these sorts of questions seem to be coming", "needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to be a really appropriate listed \"reason to", "\"contact that journal\". The OP needs some help but the question is anything", "ignore the question or close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover,", "future reader. Not all are like that. And many of these sorts of", "say and the \"answer\" is very short, is it really fine to answer", "don't require much thought or analysis to answer. Often the answer is \"ask", "\"formal answer\" to such questions seems like overkill. [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of", "question, though this one may be a the limit of where a real", "like advice on the validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions", "OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to be a really appropriate", "from new users. So, assuming that there isn't really much to say and", "been \"answering\" quite a few of these in comments lately and would like", "that there isn't really much to say and the \"answer\" is very short,", "\"answer\" could be given. Some of the questions of this kind are personal", "on the validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions seems like", "such a question, though this one may be a the limit of where", "could be given. Some of the questions of this kind are personal and", "be a the limit of where a real \"answer\" could be given. Some", "such things. The alternative might be to just ignore the question or close", "be given. Some of the questions of this kind are personal and may", "[Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though this one may be", "to just ignore the question or close it, leaving the OP unsatisfied and", "A one sentence \"formal answer\" to such questions seems like overkill. [Here is", "very short, is it really fine to answer in comments for such things.", "Moreover, there doesn't seem to be a really appropriate listed \"reason to close\"", "journal\". The OP needs some help but the question is anything but earth-shattering.", "much thought or analysis to answer. Often the answer is \"ask your advisor\"", "and would like advice on the validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\" to", "example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/148728/75368) of such a question, though this one may be a the limit", "new users. So, assuming that there isn't really much to say and the", "lately and would like advice on the validity. A one sentence \"formal answer\"", "the question is anything but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a few of", "there isn't really much to say and the \"answer\" is very short, is", "questions seem to be coming from new users. So, assuming that there isn't", "assuming that there isn't really much to say and the \"answer\" is very", "the limit of where a real \"answer\" could be given. Some of the", "your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The OP needs some help but the", "of these in comments lately and would like advice on the validity. A", "but earth-shattering. I've been \"answering\" quite a few of these in comments lately", "thought or analysis to answer. Often the answer is \"ask your advisor\" or", "Often the answer is \"ask your advisor\" or \"contact that journal\". The OP", "the OP unsatisfied and needy. Moreover, there doesn't seem to be a really", "of such a question, though this one may be a the limit of" ]
[ "row as that is easily spotted but will it pick up insidious downvoting", "but will it pick up insidious downvoting that is slow? If the system", "that is slow? If the system will not, then how do I proceed?", "get downvoted each day. I have seen other posts that mention the system", "mention the system notices serial downvoting, but will the system notice two a", "that the system will revoke downvotes of say ten in a row as", "If the system will not, then how do I proceed? Getting an answer", "but will the system notice two a day across several days? I know", "system notices serial downvoting, but will the system notice two a day across", "other posts that mention the system notices serial downvoting, but will the system", "ten in a row as that is easily spotted but will it pick", "downvotes of say ten in a row as that is easily spotted but", "answer that it won’t be spotted and can’t be changed will suggest the", "system will not, then how do I proceed? Getting an answer that it", "I know that the system will revoke downvotes of say ten in a", "that mention the system notices serial downvoting, but will the system notice two", "the system notice two a day across several days? I know that the", "of my answers get downvoted each day. I have seen other posts that", "have seen other posts that mention the system notices serial downvoting, but will", "my answers get downvoted each day. I have seen other posts that mention", "system will revoke downvotes of say ten in a row as that is", "easily spotted but will it pick up insidious downvoting that is slow? If", "day. I have seen other posts that mention the system notices serial downvoting,", "of say ten in a row as that is easily spotted but will", "I proceed? Getting an answer that it won’t be spotted and can’t be", "I have noticed that two of my answers get downvoted each day. I", "downvoting, but will the system notice two a day across several days? I", "that is easily spotted but will it pick up insidious downvoting that is", "I have seen other posts that mention the system notices serial downvoting, but", "several days? I know that the system will revoke downvotes of say ten", "know that the system will revoke downvotes of say ten in a row", "notices serial downvoting, but will the system notice two a day across several", "posts that mention the system notices serial downvoting, but will the system notice", "downvoted each day. I have seen other posts that mention the system notices", "seen other posts that mention the system notices serial downvoting, but will the", "it pick up insidious downvoting that is slow? If the system will not,", "downvoting that is slow? If the system will not, then how do I", "system notice two a day across several days? I know that the system", "have noticed that two of my answers get downvoted each day. I have", "a row as that is easily spotted but will it pick up insidious", "in a row as that is easily spotted but will it pick up", "will the system notice two a day across several days? I know that", "revoke downvotes of say ten in a row as that is easily spotted", "So I have noticed that two of my answers get downvoted each day.", "is easily spotted but will it pick up insidious downvoting that is slow?", "spotted but will it pick up insidious downvoting that is slow? If the", "Getting an answer that it won’t be spotted and can’t be changed will", "the system will revoke downvotes of say ten in a row as that", "will not, then how do I proceed? Getting an answer that it won’t", "pick up insidious downvoting that is slow? If the system will not, then", "serial downvoting, but will the system notice two a day across several days?", "two a day across several days? I know that the system will revoke", "is slow? If the system will not, then how do I proceed? Getting", "answers get downvoted each day. I have seen other posts that mention the", "each day. I have seen other posts that mention the system notices serial", "it won’t be spotted and can’t be changed will suggest the system needs", "a day across several days? I know that the system will revoke downvotes", "insidious downvoting that is slow? If the system will not, then how do", "do I proceed? Getting an answer that it won’t be spotted and can’t", "across several days? I know that the system will revoke downvotes of say", "noticed that two of my answers get downvoted each day. I have seen", "up insidious downvoting that is slow? If the system will not, then how", "not, then how do I proceed? Getting an answer that it won’t be", "an answer that it won’t be spotted and can’t be changed will suggest", "how do I proceed? Getting an answer that it won’t be spotted and", "won’t be spotted and can’t be changed will suggest the system needs changing.", "will it pick up insidious downvoting that is slow? If the system will", "as that is easily spotted but will it pick up insidious downvoting that", "days? I know that the system will revoke downvotes of say ten in", "that two of my answers get downvoted each day. I have seen other", "day across several days? I know that the system will revoke downvotes of", "proceed? Getting an answer that it won’t be spotted and can’t be changed", "the system will not, then how do I proceed? Getting an answer that", "will revoke downvotes of say ten in a row as that is easily", "that it won’t be spotted and can’t be changed will suggest the system", "notice two a day across several days? I know that the system will", "slow? If the system will not, then how do I proceed? Getting an", "the system notices serial downvoting, but will the system notice two a day", "then how do I proceed? Getting an answer that it won’t be spotted", "say ten in a row as that is easily spotted but will it", "two of my answers get downvoted each day. I have seen other posts" ]
[ "He should, at least, have mentioned that his claim is contested (and not", "I / can I do, seeing how I believe readers are being misinformed?", "search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > > Your friend is probably thinking of", "qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this not to be the case,", "the answer, but it would be the 10th or 15th comment, while the", "survey, but I have not seen evidence that this is the case; and", "and is the accepted answer. What should I / can I do, seeing", "the opposite of his claim is the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for", "favor of the copyright holder). > > > The first claim is qualified", "not marginally; to my limited knowledge, the opposite of his claim is the", "I have not made any sort of legal survey, but I have not", "answer to this question: [A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: >", "in favor of the copyright holder). > > > The first claim is", "sort of legal survey, but I have not seen evidence that this is", "has been ruled on, and they are usually in favor of the copyright", "If it's not already illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality", "comment, while the answer itself - other than the claims of illegality -", "\"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this not to be the case, since we've", "> Your friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including", "uploading stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal in", "jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled", "[A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > > Your friend is", "case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at least, have mentioned that", "15th comment, while the answer itself - other than the claims of illegality", "I can comment on the answer, but it would be the 10th or", "answer, but it would be the 10th or 15th comment, while the answer", "What should I / can I do, seeing how I believe readers are", "not to be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at", "free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > > Your friend is probably", "in most jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend", "probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including to use the service", "evidence that this is the case; and given the other dispute, I doubt", "- downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes of research is likely legal in", "knows this not to be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He", "marginally; to my limited knowledge, the opposite of his claim is the truth", "one. I admit I have not made any sort of legal survey, but", "is the accepted answer. What should I / can I do, seeing how", "evidence exists. Now, I can comment on the answer, but it would be", "that this is the case; and given the other dispute, I doubt such", "exists. Now, I can comment on the answer, but it would be the", "his claim is contested (and not marginally; to my limited knowledge, the opposite", "to be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at least,", "including to use the service (as opposed to uploading stuff onto it), in", "limited knowledge, the opposite of his claim is the truth - downloading from", "the other dispute, I doubt such evidence exists. Now, I can comment on", "- other than the claims of illegality - is useful, and is the", "it's not already illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality (i.e.", "to use the service (as opposed to uploading stuff onto it), in most", "usually in favor of the copyright holder). > > > The first claim", "downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes of research is likely legal in most", "> The first claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this", "are usually in favor of the copyright holder). > > > The first", "in your jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has", "to this question: [A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > >", "ruled on, and they are usually in favor of the copyright holder). >", "they are usually in favor of the copyright holder). > > > The", "Your friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including to", "seen evidence that this is the case; and given the other dispute, I", "and given the other dispute, I doubt such evidence exists. Now, I can", "should I / can I do, seeing how I believe readers are being", "legal in most places in the world). The second claim is a factual", "question: [A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > > Your friend", "I doubt such evidence exists. Now, I can comment on the answer, but", "factual one. I admit I have not made any sort of legal survey,", "not made any sort of legal survey, but I have not seen evidence", "while the answer itself - other than the claims of illegality - is", "accepted answer. What should I / can I do, seeing how I believe", "trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled on, and", "the copyright holder). > > > The first claim is qualified with \"likely\";", "is the case; and given the other dispute, I doubt such evidence exists.", "knowledge, the opposite of his claim is the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub", "illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit", "the case; and given the other dispute, I doubt such evidence exists. Now,", "copyright holder). > > > The first claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but", "admit I have not made any sort of legal survey, but I have", "be the 10th or 15th comment, while the answer itself - other than", "truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes of research is likely legal", "useful, and is the accepted answer. What should I / can I do,", "the world). The second claim is a factual one. I admit I have", "> > The first claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows", "use the service (as opposed to uploading stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions.", "first claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this not to", "with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this not to be the case, since", "dispute, I doubt such evidence exists. Now, I can comment on the answer,", "your jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been", "doubt such evidence exists. Now, I can comment on the answer, but it", "is a factual one. I admit I have not made any sort of", "illegal, including to use the service (as opposed to uploading stuff onto it),", "or 15th comment, while the answer itself - other than the claims of", "is likely legal in most places in the world). The second claim is", "to my limited knowledge, the opposite of his claim is the truth -", "and they are usually in favor of the copyright holder). > > >", "(and not marginally; to my limited knowledge, the opposite of his claim is", "towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled on, and they are", "answer. What should I / can I do, seeing how I believe readers", "answer itself - other than the claims of illegality - is useful, and", "purposes of research is likely legal in most places in the world). The", "not seen evidence that this is the case; and given the other dispute,", "but - @Allure knows this not to be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319)", "research is likely legal in most places in the world). The second claim", "in the world). The second claim is a factual one. I admit I", "on, and they are usually in favor of the copyright holder). > >", "the 10th or 15th comment, while the answer itself - other than the", "Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including to use the service (as opposed to", "> > > The first claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure", "mentioned that his claim is contested (and not marginally; to my limited knowledge,", "contested (and not marginally; to my limited knowledge, the opposite of his claim", "second claim is a factual one. I admit I have not made any", "illegality - is useful, and is the accepted answer. What should I /", "a factual one. I admit I have not made any sort of legal", "claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this not to be", "is qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this not to be the", "case; and given the other dispute, I doubt such evidence exists. Now, I", "friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including to use", "but it would be the 10th or 15th comment, while the answer itself", "claims of illegality - is useful, and is the accepted answer. What should", "papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > > Your friend is probably thinking", "have not made any sort of legal survey, but I have not seen", "stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal in your", "any sort of legal survey, but I have not seen evidence that this", "legal survey, but I have not seen evidence that this is the case;", "of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including to use the service (as opposed", "but I have not seen evidence that this is the case; and given", "jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend is towards", "already illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after", "world). The second claim is a factual one. I admit I have not", "that his claim is contested (and not marginally; to my limited knowledge, the", "from Sci-Hub for the purposes of research is likely legal in most places", "- is useful, and is the accepted answer. What should I / can", "is contested (and not marginally; to my limited knowledge, the opposite of his", "claim is a factual one. I admit I have not made any sort", "it), in most jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal in your jurisdiction, the", "claim is contested (and not marginally; to my limited knowledge, the opposite of", "opposed to uploading stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions. If it's not already", "opposite of his claim is the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for the", "10th or 15th comment, while the answer itself - other than the claims", "is useful, and is the accepted answer. What should I / can I", "most jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend is", "it before. He should, at least, have mentioned that his claim is contested", "claim is the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes of research", "> > Your friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal,", "on the answer, but it would be the 10th or 15th comment, while", "the purposes of research is likely legal in most places in the world).", "the claims of illegality - is useful, and is the accepted answer. What", "be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at least, have", "(i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled on, and they are usually in", "it's likely illegal, including to use the service (as opposed to uploading stuff", "at least, have mentioned that his claim is contested (and not marginally; to", "@Allure knows this not to be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before.", "comment on the answer, but it would be the 10th or 15th comment,", "this is the case; and given the other dispute, I doubt such evidence", "this not to be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should,", "the answer itself - other than the claims of illegality - is useful,", "is the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes of research is", "thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including to use the service (as", "of research is likely legal in most places in the world). The second", "onto it), in most jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal in your jurisdiction,", "have mentioned that his claim is contested (and not marginally; to my limited", "to uploading stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions. If it's not already illegal", "of illegality - is useful, and is the accepted answer. What should I", "most places in the world). The second claim is a factual one. I", "the service (as opposed to uploading stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions. If", "states that: > > Your friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's", "should, at least, have mentioned that his claim is contested (and not marginally;", "been ruled on, and they are usually in favor of the copyright holder).", "the trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled on,", "least, have mentioned that his claim is contested (and not marginally; to my", "places in the world). The second claim is a factual one. I admit", "lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled on, and they are usually in favor", "would be the 10th or 15th comment, while the answer itself - other", "service (as opposed to uploading stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions. If it's", "- @Allure knows this not to be the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it", "illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled on, and they are usually", "his claim is the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes of", "likely legal in most places in the world). The second claim is a", "this question: [A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > > Your", "The first claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but - @Allure knows this not", "(as opposed to uploading stuff onto it), in most jurisdictions. If it's not", "holder). > > > The first claim is qualified with \"likely\"; but -", "of legal survey, but I have not seen evidence that this is the", "not already illegal in your jurisdiction, the trend is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit", "made any sort of legal survey, but I have not seen evidence that", "that: > > Your friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely", "engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that: > > Your friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub.", "in most places in the world). The second claim is a factual one.", "I have not seen evidence that this is the case; and given the", "other dispute, I doubt such evidence exists. Now, I can comment on the", "than the claims of illegality - is useful, and is the accepted answer.", "the accepted answer. What should I / can I do, seeing how I", "Sci-Hub for the purposes of research is likely legal in most places in", "after lawsuit has been ruled on, and they are usually in favor of", "before. He should, at least, have mentioned that his claim is contested (and", "The second claim is a factual one. I admit I have not made", "my limited knowledge, the opposite of his claim is the truth - downloading", "it would be the 10th or 15th comment, while the answer itself -", "for the purposes of research is likely legal in most places in the", "the case, since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at least, have mentioned", "we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at least, have mentioned that his claim", "[debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at least, have mentioned that his claim is", "@Allure states that: > > Your friend is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning:", "is towards illegality (i.e. lawsuit after lawsuit has been ruled on, and they", "other than the claims of illegality - is useful, and is the accepted", "lawsuit has been ruled on, and they are usually in favor of the", "given the other dispute, I doubt such evidence exists. Now, I can comment", "of the copyright holder). > > > The first claim is qualified with", "I admit I have not made any sort of legal survey, but I", "such evidence exists. Now, I can comment on the answer, but it would", "the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes of research is likely", "Now, I can comment on the answer, but it would be the 10th", "In accepted answer to this question: [A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states", "Warning: it's likely illegal, including to use the service (as opposed to uploading", "since we've [debated](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/86414/7319) it before. He should, at least, have mentioned that his", "of his claim is the truth - downloading from Sci-Hub for the purposes", "itself - other than the claims of illegality - is useful, and is", "accepted answer to this question: [A free papers search engine](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150373/7319) @Allure states that:", "is probably thinking of Sci-Hub. Warning: it's likely illegal, including to use the", "have not seen evidence that this is the case; and given the other", "can comment on the answer, but it would be the 10th or 15th", "likely illegal, including to use the service (as opposed to uploading stuff onto" ]
[ "many examples. There is absolutely no restriction in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)", "in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher digital identification services or directories, similar", "during the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being falsely", "asked a question in Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific papers that were retracted", "because the data they provide were already published many years ago. Facts: 1.", "diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) ", "the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot ask a question of which answers", "list with no best answer. > 2. The next best question is whether", "3. Even then, the question > must outline clear criteria on the answers", "or directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1) is", "be retracted. 3. It should be clearly stated that why are the resources", "after eight whole years. Because the paper in question is a survey paper,", "also be retracted. 3. It should be clearly stated that why are the", "closed by one of the moderators? Has Academia SE become a place where", "Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3. It should be clearly stated that why", "no best answer. > 2. The next best question is whether this is", "that (1) is not really a reason to close a question. Also, (2)", "published by Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3. It should be clearly stated", "question for opinion-based: [What are some good ways to keep students coming", "for a > list with no best answer. > 2. The next best", "comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist, and I am fully aware that this", "out of curiosity, without any provocation or comments on the matter. 3. The", "the same reviewers and editors. 2. If the sources used are not credible", "is absolutely no restriction in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that", "do not approve the motivation of the authors who published this study. With", "a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid procrastination during the research phase of", "> because of the sources cited within the article, and critical comments from", "reasons that were stated as the reasons for closing are accurate (see above).", "wondered whether there are any other publications that were retracted with the same", "curiosity, without any provocation or comments on the matter. 3. The answer to", "in which 15 of them are published by Elsevier, should also be retracted.", "into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question", "2. This is a genuine question, stated out of curiosity, without any provocation", "are the ones I immediately found when I typed \"are there\" in the", "not credible, and how was it determined after eight whole years. Because the", "* [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How", "for closing are accurate (see above). My question: Why was my question voted", "comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing this question because: > > > 1.", "comments from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > >", "this said, I genuinely wondered whether there are any other publications that were", "answers to avoid being overrun with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments", "retraction. > > > So, I looked up some questions. Those are the", "to avoid being falsely accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to", "journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are not opinion-based, I", "actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the publications that took the approval", "search box: * [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) ", "[How to avoid procrastination during the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) [How", "opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check some questions that are answered", "with the same official reason: > > because of the sources cited within", "> > So, I looked up some questions. Those are the ones I", "questions are not opinion-based, I firmly believe that my question is very much", "users who voted to close my question for opinion-based: * [What are some", "* [How to avoid procrastination during the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) ", "old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) [How to avoid and address a lack of gender", "follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the publications that took the", "are many papers retracted without any solid reason, I claimed that there should", "was written with crooked intentions. I do not approve the motivation of the", "asked the question over a simple debate with my colleagues. They claimed that", "legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any guidelines for labeling axes", "there\" in the search box: * [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open", "paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the data section when data is", "many years ago. Facts: 1. I have formed my question very well, and", "best question is whether this is > commonly accepted practice, however, until the", "I am not racist, and I am fully aware that this paper was", "to avoid and address a lack of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) ", "too low (cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) [I got the following", "[Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check some questions that are answered by", "sources cited within the article, and critical comments from readers. > > >", "determined after eight whole years. Because the paper in question is a survey", "I am closing this question because: > > > 1. Taken literally, it", "asks for a > list with no best answer. > 2. The next", "that this paper was written with crooked intentions. I do not approve the", "[How to avoid being falsely accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How", "I am willing to give examples from the top questions in Academia.SE: ", "any solid reason, I claimed that there should be at least one clear", "from the top questions* in Academia.SE: * [How should I deal with discouragement", "editors. 2. If the sources used are not credible (as in the official", "should also be retracted. 3. It should be clearly stated that why are", "answers can be many. 4. None of the reasons that were stated as", "mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the publications that took the approval of the", "answer. > 2. The next best question is whether this is > commonly", "me to check some questions that are answered by the users who voted", "criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid being", "was my question voted to close, and was closed by one of the", "being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the data section when data", "colleagues. They claimed that there are many papers retracted without any solid reason,", "the question. As for (3), I am willing to give examples from the", "are accurate (see above). My question: Why was my question voted to close,", "accurate (see above). My question: Why was my question voted to close, and", "question is very much not opinion based. --- I asked the question over", "does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are not opinion-based, I firmly believe", "am willing to give examples from the top questions in Academia.SE: * [How", "the question over a simple debate with my colleagues. They claimed that there", "question. Also, (2) is plain wrong, because in the very same link I", "the sources cited within the article, and critical comments from readers. > >", "I looked up some questions. Those are the ones I immediately found when", "graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid procrastination during the research phase of my", "resources not credible, and how was it determined after eight whole years. Because", "outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with > people", "section when data is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my", "bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid and address a", "2. The next best question is whether this is > commonly accepted practice,", "papers retracted without any solid reason, I claimed that there should be at", "is. > 3. Even then, the question > must outline clear criteria on", "answer to my question can be one example, or many examples. There is", "and I am fully aware that this paper was written with crooked intentions.", "the publications that took the approval of the same reviewers and editors. 2.", "from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I", "* [How to write the data section when data is reused from a", "by one of the moderators? Has Academia SE become a place where we", "published many years ago. Facts: 1. I have formed my question very well,", "in Academia.SE: * [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student)", "were already published many years ago. Facts: 1. I have formed my question", "paper was written with crooked intentions. I do not approve the motivation of", "students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers to old", "that are answered by the users who voted to close my question for", "least one clear reason or the follow-up actions should be taken. By follow-up", "(cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the following comment from", "is whether this is > commonly accepted practice, however, until the retraction notice", "[official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that verbatim in the question. As", "it was falsified data because the data they provide were already published many", "to read papers without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions", "clear criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with people sharing their", "to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1) is not really a", "meet the criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear criteria on the answers to", "to avoid being overrun with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged", "same official reason: > > because of the sources cited within the article,", "[Are there any examples of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there", "not opinion based. --- I asked the question over a simple debate with", "the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being falsely accused", "due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist, and I am", "it asks for a > list with no best answer. > 2. The", "a lack of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I being", "is not really a reason to close a question. Also, (2) is plain", "credible (as in the official notice), then the papers those are based on", "in Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific papers that were retracted by the publisher", "and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1) is not really a reason to", "to close my question for opinion-based: * [What are some good ways to", "above questions are not opinion-based, I firmly believe that my question is very", "[Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any", "notice is > published, it is not clear what this is. > 3.", "comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above", "the answers to avoid being overrun with > people sharing their opinion on", "following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the", "stated as the reasons for closing are accurate (see above). My question: Why", "question, stated out of curiosity, without any provocation or comments on the matter.", "of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any guidelines for labeling", "my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being falsely accused of harassment by a", "this is > commonly accepted practice, however, until the retraction notice is >", "the criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid", "> must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with", "ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1) is not really a reason to close", "taken. By follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the publications that", "with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid procrastination during the", "I do not approve the motivation of the authors who published this study.", "accepted practice, however, until the retraction notice is > published, it is not", "Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check some questions that are answered by the", "used are not credible (as in the official notice), then the papers those", "approve the motivation of the authors who published this study. With this said,", "tells me that (1) is not really a reason to close a question.", "dissertation was unfairly graded too low (cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) ", "crooked intentions. I do not approve the motivation of the authors who published", "matter. 3. The answer to my question can be one example, or many", "work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) [I believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too low (cum", "without any provocation or comments on the matter. 3. The answer to my", "being overrun with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to", "reason to close a question. Also, (2) is plain wrong, because in the", "of which answers can be many. 4. None of the reasons that were", "unfairly graded too low (cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got", "to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist, and I am fully", "falsified data because the data they provide were already published many years ago.", "literally, it asks for a > list with no best answer. > 2.", "one clear reason or the follow-up actions should be taken. By follow-up actions", "approval of the same reviewers and editors. 2. If the sources used are", "proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write", "official reason: > > because of the sources cited within the article, and", "of them are published by Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3. It should", "of the sources cited within the article, and critical comments from readers. >", "of curiosity, without any provocation or comments on the matter. 3. The answer", "the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot ask a question", "previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too low", "was closed by one of the moderators? Has Academia SE become a place", "identification services or directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that", "on those resources, in which 15 of them are published by Elsevier, should", "people sharing their opinion on the retraction. > > > So, I looked", "grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to", "on the matter. 3. The answer to my question can be one example,", "article, and critical comments from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the", "I asked the question over a simple debate with my colleagues. They claimed", "is not clear what this is. > 3. Even then, the question >", "data they provide were already published many years ago. Facts: 1. I have", "which states that I cannot ask a question of which answers can be", "overrun with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check", "* [Are there any guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there", "on the answers to avoid being overrun with > people sharing their opinion", "ways to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line", "PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too low (cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558)", "15 of them are published by Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3. It", "of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers without falling into", "and clear. 2. This is a genuine question, stated out of curiosity, without", "were retracted with the same official reason: > > because of the sources", "is plain wrong, because in the very same link I have posted, there", "with no best answer. > 2. The next best question is whether this", "question must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with", "I firmly believe that my question is very much not opinion based. ---", "criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with > people sharing their", "Academia.SE: * [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) ", "deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) [How to avoid procrastination during", "[I believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too low (cum laude): what", "there any researcher digital identification services or directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar)", "publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist, and I", "clear reason or the follow-up actions should be taken. By follow-up actions I", "It should be clearly stated that why are the resources not credible, and", "3. It should be clearly stated that why are the resources not credible,", "are any other publications that were retracted with the same official reason: >", "(postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the data section when data is reused from", "My question: Why was my question voted to close, and was closed by", "credible, and how was it determined after eight whole years. Because the paper", "site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot ask a question of which answers can", "took the approval of the same reviewers and editors. 2. If the sources", "any researcher digital identification services or directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which", "the sources used are not credible (as in the official notice), then the", "whole years. Because the paper in question is a survey paper, and one", "of the reasons that were stated as the reasons for closing are accurate", "are not opinion-based, I firmly believe that my question is very much not", "* [Are there any researcher digital identification services or directories, similar to ORCID", "top questions in Academia.SE: * [How should I deal with discouragement as a", "criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with people sharing their opinion.”", "above). My question: Why was my question voted to close, and was closed", "None of the reasons that were stated as the reasons for closing are", "ask a question of which answers can be many. 4. None of the", "that were retracted with the same official reason: > > because of the", "> published, it is not clear what this is. > 3. Even then,", "up some questions. Those are the ones I immediately found when I typed", "(1) is not really a reason to close a question. Also, (2) is", "sources used are not credible (as in the official notice), then the papers", "states that I cannot ask a question of which answers can be many.", "the papers those are based on those resources, in which 15 of them", "the ones I immediately found when I typed \"are there\" in the search", "any examples of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any guidelines", "must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with people", "motivation of the authors who published this study. With this said, I genuinely", "and how was it determined after eight whole years. Because the paper in", "Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any examples of legal issues", "question very well, and clear. 2. This is a genuine question, stated out", "by the publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist,", "one of the moderators? Has Academia SE become a place where we cannot", "question > must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun", "axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher digital identification services or directories,", "clear. 2. This is a genuine question, stated out of curiosity, without any", "the very same link I have posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and", "> 2. The next best question is whether this is > commonly accepted", "stated out of curiosity, without any provocation or comments on the matter. 3.", "* [How to avoid being falsely accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) ", "of those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear criteria on", "a genuine question, stated out of curiosity, without any provocation or comments on", "were retracted by the publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer:* I am", "they provide were already published many years ago. Facts: 1. I have formed", "the search box: * [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals)", "that I cannot ask a question of which answers can be many. 4.", "in question is a survey paper, and one cannot claim it was falsified", "examples of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any guidelines for", "I have written that verbatim in the question. As for (3), I am", "I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the following comment from a reputed math journal.", "best answer. > 2. The next best question is whether this is >", "in the very same link I have posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article),", "claimed that there are many papers retracted without any solid reason, I claimed", "claimed that there should be at least one clear reason or the follow-up", "that there should be at least one clear reason or the follow-up actions", "the paper in question is a survey paper, and one cannot claim it", "data because the data they provide were already published many years ago. Facts:", "for (3), I am willing to give examples from the top questions in", "by Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3. It should be clearly stated that", "[What are some good ways to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons", "> list with no best answer. > 2. The next best question is", "practice, however, until the retraction notice is > published, it is not clear", "Those are the ones I immediately found when I typed \"are there\" in", "What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are not opinion-based, I firmly", "be many. 4. None of the reasons that were stated as the reasons", "am closing this question because: > > > 1. Taken literally, it asks", "really a reason to close a question. Also, (2) is plain wrong, because", "some questions that are answered by the users who voted to close my", "I have formed my question very well, and clear. 2. This is a", "plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher digital identification services or directories, similar to", "graded too low (cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the", "got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564)", "some good ways to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not", "from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded", "that took the approval of the same reviewers and editors. 2. If the", "voted to close my question for opinion-based: * [What are some good ways", "question over a simple debate with my colleagues. They claimed that there are", "follow-up actions should be taken. By follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of", "Even then, the question > must outline clear criteria on the answers to", "question. As for (3), I am willing to give examples from the *top", "academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) [Are there any guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) ", "a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) [I believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too", "procrastination during the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being", "question is a survey paper, and one cannot claim it was falsified data", "my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too low (cum laude): what should I", "is a survey paper, and one cannot claim it was falsified data because", "years. Because the paper in question is a survey paper, and one cannot", "* [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there", "not opinion-based, I firmly believe that my question is very much not opinion", "I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the publications that took the approval of", "opinion on the retraction. > > > So, I looked up some questions.", "within the article, and critical comments from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated", "answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid and address a lack", "clear criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with > people sharing", "restriction in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot ask", "retracted without any solid reason, I claimed that there should be at least", "[in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing this question because: > >", "whether this is > commonly accepted practice, however, until the retraction notice is", "Re-evaluation of all the publications that took the approval of the same reviewers", "I have posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that", "official notice), then the papers those are based on those resources, in which", "question is whether this is > commonly accepted practice, however, until the retraction", "access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any examples of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud)", "there any examples of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any", "any guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher digital", "services or directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1)", "very same link I have posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I", "all the publications that took the approval of the same reviewers and editors.", "stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing this question because: >", "* [What are some good ways to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) ", "very much not* opinion based. --- I asked the question over a simple", "the users who voted to close my question for opinion-based: * [What are", "there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any examples", "Why was my question voted to close, and was closed by one of", "questions that are answered by the users who voted to close my question", "because: > > > 1. Taken literally, it asks for a > list", "resources, in which 15 of them are published by Elsevier, should also be", "> > because of the sources cited within the article, and critical comments", "(2) is plain wrong, because in the very same link I have posted,", "same link I have posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have", "the moderators? Has Academia SE become a place where we cannot even ask", "gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255)", "be one example, or many examples. There is absolutely no restriction in the", "to avoid being overrun with > people sharing their opinion on the retraction.", "I immediately found when I typed \"are there\" in the search box: ", "(see above). My question: Why was my question voted to close, and was", "with my colleagues. They claimed that there are many papers retracted without any", "are some good ways to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) [Reasons for", "my colleagues. They claimed that there are many papers retracted without any solid", "give examples from the top questions in Academia.SE: * [How should I deal", "comments encouraged me to check some questions that are answered by the users", "already published many years ago. Facts: 1. I have formed my question very", "to check some questions that are answered by the users who voted to", "in the question. As for (3), I am willing to give examples from", "there should be at least one clear reason or the follow-up actions should", "clear what this is. > 3. Even then, the question > must outline", "posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that verbatim in", "[How to avoid and address a lack of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503)", "1. I have formed my question very well, and clear. 2. This is", "what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the following comment from a reputed", "that were retracted by the publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I", "cannot claim it was falsified data because the data they provide were already", "reasons for closing are accurate (see above). My question: Why was my question", "* [I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does", "papers those are based on those resources, in which 15 of them are", "a survey paper, and one cannot claim it was falsified data because the", "Academia SE become a place where we cannot even ask questions due to", "laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the following comment from a", "sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check some questions that", "a question in Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific papers that were retracted by", "to give examples from the top questions in Academia.SE: * [How should I", "and editors. 2. If the sources used are not credible (as in the", "comments on the matter. 3. The answer to my question can be one", "and I have written that verbatim in the question. As for (3), I", "my question voted to close, and was closed by one of the moderators?", "am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the data section", "because in the very same link I have posted, there is [official retraction", "it is not clear what this is. > 3. Even then, the question", "> So, I looked up some questions. Those are the ones I immediately", "[Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to", "> people sharing their opinion on the retraction. > > > So, I", "to avoid procrastination during the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to", "was unfairly graded too low (cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I", "opinion-based, I firmly believe that my question is very much not opinion based.", "avoid and address a lack of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What", "1. Taken literally, it asks for a > list with no best answer.", "provocation or comments on the matter. 3. The answer to my question can", "for opinion-based: * [What are some good ways to keep students coming to", "when data is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my PhD", "avoid being overrun with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me", "same reviewers and editors. 2. If the sources used are not credible (as", "moderators? Has Academia SE become a place where we cannot even ask questions", "reviewers and editors. 2. If the sources used are not credible (as in", "coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers to old exam", "with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs)", "The next best question is whether this is > commonly accepted practice, however,", "\"are there\" in the search box: * [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based", "a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question must", "question of which answers can be many. 4. None of the reasons that", "any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any examples of", "[Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing this question because:", "which 15 of them are published by Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3.", "I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the data section when", "aware that this paper was written with crooked intentions. I do not approve", "with crooked intentions. I do not approve the motivation of the authors who", "some questions. Those are the ones I immediately found when I typed \"are", "by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers without falling into a rabbit", "published, it is not clear what this is. > 3. Even then, the", "are published by Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3. It should be clearly", "the publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist, and", "debate with my colleagues. They claimed that there are many papers retracted without", "of the moderators? Has Academia SE become a place where we cannot even", "the answers to avoid being overrun with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause)", "overrun with > people sharing their opinion on the retraction. > > >", "ones I immediately found when I typed \"are there\" in the search box:", "avoid being falsely accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read", "that there are many papers retracted without any solid reason, I claimed that", "be clearly stated that why are the resources not credible, and how was", "The answer to my question can be one example, or many examples. There", "not credible (as in the official notice), then the papers those are based", "retracted with the same official reason: > > because of the sources cited", "for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the data section when data is reused", "reputed math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are not", "absolutely no restriction in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I", "of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being falsely accused of harassment by", "next best question is whether this is > commonly accepted practice, however, until", "[How to write the data section when data is reused from a previous", "should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid", "in the official notice), then the papers those are based on those resources,", "Also, (2) is plain wrong, because in the very same link I have", "to close a question. Also, (2) is plain wrong, because in the very", "is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that verbatim in the question.", "* [Are there any examples of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are", "this study. With this said, I genuinely wondered whether there are any other", "not clear what this is. > 3. Even then, the question > must", "is > published, it is not clear what this is. > 3. Even", "There is absolutely no restriction in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states", "box: * [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are", "being falsely accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers", "* [How to read papers without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of", "are based on those resources, in which 15 of them are published by", "the same official reason: > > because of the sources cited within the", "be taken. By follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the publications", "I typed \"are there\" in the search box: * [Are there any trustworthy", "should be taken. By follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the", "stated that why are the resources not credible, and how was it determined", "there are many papers retracted without any solid reason, I claimed that there", "wrong, because in the very same link I have posted, there is [official", "questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid and address a lack of gender diversity in", "eight whole years. Because the paper in question is a survey paper, and", "authors who published this study. With this said, I genuinely wondered whether there", "I claimed that there should be at least one clear reason or the", "“[T]he question must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun", "any scientific papers that were retracted by the publisher due to the reader", "rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question must outline", "the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing this question because: > > >", "questions. Those are the ones I immediately found when I typed \"are there\"", "> I am closing this question because: > > > 1. Taken literally,", "on the answers to avoid being overrun with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan", "of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I being paid for?", "ago. Facts: 1. I have formed my question very well, and clear. 2.", "or comments on the matter. 3. The answer to my question can be", "> [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing this question", "Taken literally, it asks for a > list with no best answer. >", "actions should be taken. By follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all", "4. None of the reasons that were stated as the reasons for closing", "a reputed math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are", "what this is. > 3. Even then, the question > must outline clear", "no restriction in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot", "question in Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific papers that were retracted by the", "* [I believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too low (cum laude):", "the question > must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid being", "paper in question is a survey paper, and one cannot claim it was", "as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid procrastination during the research phase", "when I typed \"are there\" in the search box: * [Are there any", "written that verbatim in the question. As for (3), I am willing to", "provide were already published many years ago. Facts: 1. I have formed my", "to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers", "published this study. With this said, I genuinely wondered whether there are any", "have written that verbatim in the question. As for (3), I am willing", "the follow-up actions should be taken. By follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation", "not racist, and I am fully aware that this paper was written with", "question voted to close, and was closed by one of the moderators? Has", "falsely accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers without", "and was closed by one of the moderators? Has Academia SE become a", "was it determined after eight whole years. Because the paper in question is", "example, or many examples. There is absolutely no restriction in the [rules of", "[Are there any scientific papers that were retracted by the publisher due to", "sharing their opinion on the retraction. > > > So, I looked up", "Because the paper in question is a survey paper, and one cannot claim", "there any scientific papers that were retracted by the publisher due to the", "from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions", "for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher digital identification services", "solid reason, I claimed that there should be at least one clear reason", "believe that my question is very much not opinion based. --- I asked", "close a question. Also, (2) is plain wrong, because in the very same", "I genuinely wondered whether there are any other publications that were retracted with", "> > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing this", "> > I am closing this question because: > > > 1. Taken", "on the retraction. > > > So, I looked up some questions. Those", "reason: > > because of the sources cited within the article, and critical", "close, and was closed by one of the moderators? Has Academia SE become", "> 3. Even then, the question > must outline clear criteria on the", "By follow-up actions I mean: 1. Re-evaluation of all the publications that took", "in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot ask a", "hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear", "answers to avoid being overrun with > people sharing their opinion on the", "should be clearly stated that why are the resources not credible, and how", "until the retraction notice is > published, it is not clear what this", "avoid procrastination during the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid", "a > list with no best answer. > 2. The next best question", "exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid and address a lack of gender diversity", "reason, I claimed that there should be at least one clear reason or", "digital identification services or directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me", "directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1) is not", "by the users who voted to close my question for opinion-based: * [What", "outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with people sharing", "genuinely wondered whether there are any other publications that were retracted with the", "--- I asked the question over a simple debate with my colleagues. They", "the official notice), then the papers those are based on those resources, in", "notice), then the papers those are based on those resources, in which 15", "very well, and clear. 2. This is a genuine question, stated out of", "the motivation of the authors who published this study. With this said, I", "the resources not credible, and how was it determined after eight whole years.", "many. 4. None of the reasons that were stated as the reasons for", "If the above questions are not opinion-based, I firmly believe that my question", "examples from the top questions in Academia.SE: * [How should I deal with", "question can be one example, or many examples. There is absolutely no restriction", "there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that verbatim in the", "retraction notice is > published, it is not clear what this is. >", "So, I looked up some questions. Those are the ones I immediately found", "the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist, and I am fully aware", "looked up some questions. Those are the ones I immediately found when I", "for not releasing bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid", "who published this study. With this said, I genuinely wondered whether there are", "not approve the motivation of the authors who published this study. With this", "however, until the retraction notice is > published, it is not clear what", "those are based on those resources, in which 15 of them are published", "one example, or many examples. There is absolutely no restriction in the [rules", "was falsified data because the data they provide were already published many years", "clearly stated that why are the resources not credible, and how was it", "then the papers those are based on those resources, in which 15 of", "who voted to close my question for opinion-based: * [What are some good", "the reasons that were stated as the reasons for closing are accurate (see", "verbatim in the question. As for (3), I am willing to give examples", "why are the resources not credible, and how was it determined after eight", "retracted by the publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not", "said, I genuinely wondered whether there are any other publications that were retracted", "similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1) is not really", "have posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that verbatim", "critical comments from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): >", "it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are not opinion-based, I firmly believe that", "this question because: > > > 1. Taken literally, it asks for a", "data is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my PhD dissertation", "None of those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear criteria", "is very much not opinion based. --- I asked the question over a", "to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid and address a lack of", "a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole)", "3. The answer to my question can be one example, or many examples.", "become a place where we cannot even ask questions due to current political", "fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any examples of legal issues with", "As for (3), I am willing to give examples from the top questions", "answered by the users who voted to close my question for opinion-based: ", "publications that took the approval of the same reviewers and editors. 2. If", "and address a lack of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) [What am", "the approval of the same reviewers and editors. 2. If the sources used", "> > 1. Taken literally, it asks for a > list with no", "papers that were retracted by the publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer:", "reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the) Disclaimer: I am not racist, and I am fully aware that", "releasing bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid and address", "If the sources used are not credible (as in the official notice), then", "this is. > 3. Even then, the question > must outline clear criteria", "I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid procrastination", "with people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check some", "survey paper, and one cannot claim it was falsified data because the data", "papers without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet the", "a question. Also, (2) is plain wrong, because in the very same link", "This is a genuine question, stated out of curiosity, without any provocation or", "Disclaimer: I am not racist, and I am fully aware that this paper", "with > people sharing their opinion on the retraction. > > > So,", "guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher digital identification", "found when I typed \"are there\" in the search box: * [Are there", "the retraction. > > > So, I looked up some questions. Those are", "paper, and one cannot claim it was falsified data because the data they", "of the same reviewers and editors. 2. If the sources used are not", "[Are there any researcher digital identification services or directories, similar to ORCID and", "are not credible (as in the official notice), then the papers those are", "(3), I am willing to give examples from the top questions in Academia.SE:", "write the data section when data is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) ", "> > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am closing", "Yesterday, I asked a question in Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific papers that", "over a simple debate with my colleagues. They claimed that there are many", "encouraged me to check some questions that are answered by the users who", "do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) [I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What", "their opinion on the retraction. > > > So, I looked up some", "* [What am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the", "[Are there any guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any", "link I have posted, there is [official retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written", "researcher digital identification services or directories, similar to ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells", "being overrun with > people sharing their opinion on the retraction. > >", "student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid procrastination during the research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd)", "opinion-based: * [What are some good ways to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621)", "mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are not opinion-based, I firmly believe that my", "> > > 1. Taken literally, it asks for a > list with", "I asked a question in Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific papers that were", "intentions. I do not approve the motivation of the authors who published this", "the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If", "falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he", "my question can be one example, or many examples. There is absolutely no", "reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly", "2. If the sources used are not credible (as in the official notice),", "cannot ask a question of which answers can be many. 4. None of", "avoid being overrun with > people sharing their opinion on the retraction. >", "typed \"are there\" in the search box: * [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics", "check some questions that are answered by the users who voted to close", "well, and clear. 2. This is a genuine question, stated out of curiosity,", "is a genuine question, stated out of curiosity, without any provocation or comments", "or many examples. There is absolutely no restriction in the [rules of the", "questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear criteria on the answers", "a reason to close a question. Also, (2) is plain wrong, because in", "[How to read papers without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those", "a place where we cannot even ask questions due to current political situations?", "student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None", "the article, and critical comments from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in", "not really a reason to close a question. Also, (2) is plain wrong,", "those questions meet the criterion: “[T]he question must outline clear criteria on the", "(as in the official notice), then the papers those are based on those", "retracted. 3. It should be clearly stated that why are the resources not", "of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot ask a question of which", "cited within the article, and critical comments from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft)", "that were stated as the reasons for closing are accurate (see above). My", "much not opinion based. --- I asked the question over a simple debate", "the retraction notice is > published, it is not clear what this is.", "other publications that were retracted with the same official reason: > > because", "claim it was falsified data because the data they provide were already published", "phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being falsely accused of harassment", "should be at least one clear reason or the follow-up actions should be", "With this said, I genuinely wondered whether there are any other publications that", "firmly believe that my question is very much not opinion based. --- I", "harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers without falling into a", "the authors who published this study. With this said, I genuinely wondered whether", "written with crooked intentions. I do not approve the motivation of the authors", "* [How to avoid and address a lack of gender diversity in grant", "the data they provide were already published many years ago. Facts: 1. I", "them are published by Elsevier, should also be retracted. 3. It should be", "ORCID and ResearcherID?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/28240/are-there-any-researcher-digital-identification-services-or-directories-similar) Which tells me that (1) is not really a reason", "question: Why was my question voted to close, and was closed by one", "of the authors who published this study. With this said, I genuinely wondered", "willing to give examples from the top questions in Academia.SE: * [How should", "one cannot claim it was falsified data because the data they provide were", "plain wrong, because in the very same link I have posted, there is", "> 1. Taken literally, it asks for a > list with no best", "to close, and was closed by one of the moderators? Has Academia SE", "be at least one clear reason or the follow-up actions should be taken.", "the top questions in Academia.SE: * [How should I deal with discouragement as", "whether there are any other publications that were retracted with the same official", "must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid being overrun with >", "open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any examples of legal issues with academic", "which answers can be many. 4. None of the reasons that were stated", "and one cannot claim it was falsified data because the data they provide", "without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet the criterion:", "[I got the following comment from a reputed math journal. What does it", "Has Academia SE become a place where we cannot even ask questions due", "math journal. What does it mean?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/126547/i-got-the-following-comment-from-a-reputed-math-journal-what-does-it-mean/126564#126564) If the above questions are not opinion-based,", "how was it determined after eight whole years. Because the paper in question", "accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student) * [How to read papers without falling", "I am fully aware that this paper was written with crooked intentions. I", "because of the sources cited within the article, and critical comments from readers.", "of all the publications that took the approval of the same reviewers and", "have formed my question very well, and clear. 2. This is a genuine", "data section when data is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe", "is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I believe my PhD dissertation was", "commonly accepted practice, however, until the retraction notice is > published, it is", "at least one clear reason or the follow-up actions should be taken. By", "those resources, in which 15 of them are published by Elsevier, should also", "many papers retracted without any solid reason, I claimed that there should be", "opinion based. --- I asked the question over a simple debate with my", "close my question for opinion-based: * [What are some good ways to keep", "and critical comments from readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829):", "study. With this said, I genuinely wondered whether there are any other publications", "then, the question > must outline clear criteria on the answers to avoid", "formed my question very well, and clear. 2. This is a genuine question,", "a question of which answers can be many. 4. None of the reasons", "low (cum laude): what should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the following comment", "are answered by the users who voted to close my question for opinion-based:", "voted to close, and was closed by one of the moderators? Has Academia", "there any guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher", "readers. > > > [Wrzlprmft](http://thttps://academia.stackexchange.com/users/7734/wrzlprmft) stated [in the comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the#comment402197_150829): > > I am", "any other publications that were retracted with the same official reason: > >", "is > commonly accepted practice, however, until the retraction notice is > published,", "question because: > > > 1. Taken literally, it asks for a >", "my question for opinion-based: * [What are some good ways to keep students", "my question is very much not opinion based. --- I asked the question", "They claimed that there are many papers retracted without any solid reason, I", "genuine question, stated out of curiosity, without any provocation or comments on the", "am fully aware that this paper was written with crooked intentions. I do", "fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any guidelines for labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are", "labeling axes in plots/graphs?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18357/are-there-any-guidelines-for-labeling-axes-in-plots-graphs) * [Are there any researcher digital identification services or", "immediately found when I typed \"are there\" in the search box: * [Are", "based on those resources, in which 15 of them are published by Elsevier,", "closing are accurate (see above). My question: Why was my question voted to", "are the resources not credible, and how was it determined after eight whole", "reason or the follow-up actions should be taken. By follow-up actions I mean:", "that verbatim in the question. As for (3), I am willing to give", "me that (1) is not really a reason to close a question. Also,", "[What am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How to write the data", "research phase of my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being falsely accused of", "fully aware that this paper was written with crooked intentions. I do not", "their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check some questions that are", "PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5786/how-to-avoid-procrastination-during-the-research-phase-of-my-phd) * [How to avoid being falsely accused of harassment by a student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/98176/how-to-avoid-being-falsely-accused-of-harassment-by-a-student)", "the data section when data is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446) * [I", "that my question is very much not opinion based. --- I asked the", "based. --- I asked the question over a simple debate with my colleagues.", "this paper was written with crooked intentions. I do not approve the motivation", "to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342)", "> commonly accepted practice, however, until the retraction notice is > published, it", "issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) * [Are there any guidelines for labeling axes in", "can be one example, or many examples. There is absolutely no restriction in", "lack of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I being paid", "not releasing bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How to avoid and", "any provocation or comments on the matter. 3. The answer to my question", "my question very well, and clear. 2. This is a genuine question, stated", "or the follow-up actions should be taken. By follow-up actions I mean: 1.", "I cannot ask a question of which answers can be many. 4. None", "the matter. 3. The answer to my question can be one example, or", "the reasons for closing are accurate (see above). My question: Why was my", "Facts: 1. I have formed my question very well, and clear. 2. This", "read papers without falling into a rabbit hole?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/68605/how-to-read-papers-without-falling-into-a-rabbit-hole) None of those questions meet", "closing this question because: > > > 1. Taken literally, it asks for", "good ways to keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not releasing", "should I do?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/139502/i-believe-my-phd-dissertation-was-unfairly-graded-too-low-cum-laude-what-shou/139558#139558) * [I got the following comment from a reputed math", "to write the data section when data is reused from a previous work?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149445/how-to-write-the-data-section-when-data-is-reused-from-a-previous-work/149446#149446)", "1. Re-evaluation of all the publications that took the approval of the same", "journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) * [Are there any examples of legal issues with academic fraud?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/134906/are-there-any-examples-of-legal-issues-with-academic-fraud) ", "the above questions are not opinion-based, I firmly believe that my question is", "trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access journals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/42090/are-there-any-trustworthy-mathematics-fee-based-open-access-journals) [Are there any examples of legal", "discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to avoid procrastination during the research", "racist, and I am fully aware that this paper was written with crooked", "[rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which states that I cannot ask a question of", "SE become a place where we cannot even ask questions due to current", "were stated as the reasons for closing are accurate (see above). My question:", "lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) ", "publications that were retracted with the same official* reason: > > because of", "keep students coming to lectures?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/57619/what-are-some-good-ways-to-keep-students-coming-to-lectures/57621#57621) * [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers to", "it determined after eight whole years. Because the paper in question is a", "examples. There is absolutely no restriction in the [rules of the site](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) which", "can be many. 4. None of the reasons that were stated as the", "* [Reasons for not releasing bottom-line answers to old exam questions?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/99332/reasons-for-not-releasing-bottom-line-answers-to-old-exam-questions/99342#99342) * [How", "Which tells me that (1) is not really a reason to close a", "am not racist, and I am fully aware that this paper was written", "simple debate with my colleagues. They claimed that there are many papers retracted", "a simple debate with my colleagues. They claimed that there are many papers", "as the reasons for closing are accurate (see above). My question: Why was", "years ago. Facts: 1. I have formed my question very well, and clear.", "without any solid reason, I claimed that there should be at least one", "in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I being paid for? (postdoc)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150244/what-am-i-being-paid-for-postdoc/150255#150255) * [How", "Academia.SE: [Are there any scientific papers that were retracted by the publisher due", "to my question can be one example, or many examples. There is absolutely", "in the search box: * [Are there any trustworthy Mathematics fee-based open access", "believe my PhD dissertation was unfairly graded too low (cum laude): what should", "there are any other publications that were retracted with the same official reason:", "announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that verbatim in the question. As for (3),", "> > > So, I looked up some questions. Those are the ones", "scientific papers that were retracted by the publisher due to the reader comments?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150829/are-there-any-scientific-papers-that-were-retracted-by-the-publisher-due-to-the)", "that why are the resources not credible, and how was it determined after", "questions** in Academia.SE: * [How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate", "[How should I deal with discouragement as a graduate student?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2219/how-should-i-deal-with-discouragement-as-a-graduate-student) * [How to", "address a lack of gender diversity in grant proposals?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/150500/how-to-avoid-and-address-a-lack-of-gender-diversity-in-grant-proposals/150503#150503) * [What am I", "retraction announcement](https://www.journals.elsevier.com/personality-and-individual-differences/announcements/rushton-and-templer-article), and I have written that verbatim in the question. As for", "people sharing their opinion.” [Bryan Krauses](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/users/63475/bryan-krause) comments encouraged me to check some questions" ]
[ "talk about what happened to them during WW2? If that is the case,", "to talk about what happened to them during WW2? If that is the", "want people to talk about what happened to them during WW2? If that", "happened to them during WW2? If that is the case, I want a", "what happened to them during WW2? If that is the case, I want", "people to talk about what happened to them during WW2? If that is", "Japanese-Americans not want people to talk about what happened to them during WW2?", "to them during WW2? If that is the case, I want a source.", "Do Japanese-Americans not want people to talk about what happened to them during", "not want people to talk about what happened to them during WW2? If", "about what happened to them during WW2? If that is the case, I", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/150925/25124> Do Japanese-Americans not want people to talk about what happened to them" ]
[ "long as it doesn't violate the CoC. However I believe there comes a", "doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems", "towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are in bold.", "been reprimanded for something, throw a couple extra kicks in. Apart from Meta", "this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also", "I have never seen such badly downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange network", "already, and further downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful. It happened to one", "I have not seen on the other sites that I'm equally active in", "people that walk by the body on the ground and see that the", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case", "-2, can you provide me with some insight as to why you do", "chain reaction that lead eventually to at least 1 suspension, but I won't", "helpful. It happened to one of my answers recently, causing a chain reaction", "observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is", "[Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes", "but I won't go into too much detail about my own situation since", "I never downvoted anyone for about 2 years). I appreciate that not everyone", "about my own situation since I'm biased there. Today I noticed another relatively", "at least 1 suspension, but I won't go into too much detail about", "clearly it shouldn't be on the site and it will quickly get deleted", "it tolerated (if you are one of the people that do this, for", "button, but not a downvote button. * Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but", "opinion as me, and that people can downvote when they like, as long", "has observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question", "like to voice it here): * MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives", "like someone that's already been beaten by the police, but long after the", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when the number goes negative enough,", "add to the user's misery. I picture this like someone that's already been", "a post has been downvoted enough already, and further downvoting becomes more harmful", "been on this site for over 2 years and only picked up the", "do this)?** Similar problems have been recognized by others (e.g. [Why my question", "the person has been reprimanded for something, throw a couple extra kicks in.", "network) has an upvote button, but not a downvote button. * Facebook has", "which a post has been downvoted enough already, and further downvoting becomes more", "deleted by others?)? *Or do you usually do this because the post angers", "the SE network) has an upvote button, but not a downvote button. ", "the ground and see that the person has been reprimanded for something, throw", "that the person has been reprimanded for something, throw a couple extra kicks", "can do successfully?** To conclude my (personal) opinion on this issue (which I", "same opinion as me, and that people can downvote when they like, as", "in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen on the other sites that", "for it to be deleted by others, since if it's so bad clearly", "no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A", "my answers recently, causing a chain reaction that lead eventually to at least", "it to -12, so I wonder: If you are one of the people", "seemingly wants to add to the user's misery. I picture this like someone", "causing a chain reaction that lead eventually to at least 1 suspension, but", "body on the ground and see that the person has been reprimanded for", "can you provide me with some insight as to why you do this)?", "of the people that do this, for example downvoting a post that already", "it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to have a downvoting problem in general", "problems have been recognized by others (e.g. [Why my question gets so many", "wonder what you think writing a stern comment can't do, that downvoting something", "the site and it will quickly get deleted by others?)? Or do you", "(meaning I never downvoted anyone for about 2 years). I appreciate that not", "shouldn't be on the site and it will quickly get deleted by others?)?", "by others?)? *Or do you usually do this because the post angers you", "to voice it here): MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives outside", "a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen on the", "by others (e.g. [Why my question gets so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303))", "26 sites). The post shown above had a net score of -11 when", "1 month ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone for about 2 years). I", "clearly knows what they're doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image", "(<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen on the other sites that I'm equally", "into too much detail about my own situation since I'm biased there. Today", "have been recognized by others (e.g. [Why my question gets so many downvotes?", "others?)? Or do you usually do this because the post angers you so", "below -2, can you provide me with some insight as to why you", "so badly that you feel you need to stab it further? In the", "welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone to share the same opinion as me.", "for about 2 years). I appreciate that not everyone has the same opinion", "you provide me with some insight as to why you do this)? Similar", "Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never seen such badly downvoted posts on", "skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are in", "this because the post angers you so badly that you feel you need", "throw a couple extra kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is", "you so badly that you feel you need to stab it further? In", "rep on 7 sites and 150+ rep on 26 sites). The post shown", "everyone to share the same opinion as me. If you contribute to negative-downvoting", "you are one of the people that pushes such posts further into the", "downvoted anyone for about 2 years). I appreciate that not everyone has the", "need to stab it further? In the latter case, my personal opinion is", "on this site for over 2 years and only picked up the critic", "is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a", "situation since I'm biased there. Today I noticed another relatively high-rep user (who", "posts on the Stack Exchange network over about a decade of being here.", "away, people that walk by the body on the ground and see that", "downvoting should only be done in very exceptional circumstances: I've been on this", "related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4", "[Why my question gets so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site", "I wonder what you think writing a stern comment can't do, that downvoting", "MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives outside the SE network) has an", "be deleted (if so, why don't you vote to delete or if you", "low negative score, can do successfully? To conclude my (personal) opinion on this", "have gone away, people that walk by the body on the ground and", "cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This", "negative score, but there's been zero issues on the site, and [all 7", "If you are one of the people that pushes such posts further into", "you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you think writing a stern", "a very low negative score, can do successfully?** To conclude my (personal) opinion", "like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have", "just flag it or wait for it to be deleted by others, since", "opinion is that the behavior is starting to tread on the fence of", "very low negative score, can do successfully? To conclude my (personal) opinion on", "and further downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful. It happened to one of", "Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303).", "tread on the fence of violating the CoC and the policy of \"Be", "I appreciate that not everyone has the same opinion as me, and that", "delete or if you don't have enough rep, just flag it or wait", "a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are in bold. Thank you for your considerations.", "expect everyone to share the same opinion as me. If you contribute to", "site seems to have a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have", "phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially", "that when the number goes negative enough, everyone that passes by seemingly wants", "post that already has a net score below -2, can you provide me", "we have absolutely no Q/A that have a net negative score, but there's", "of being here. Why does this community do this, and why is it", "post shown above had a net score of -11 when someone decided to", "question should be deleted (if so, why don't you vote to delete or", "been recognized by others (e.g. [Why my question gets so many downvotes? Is", "on the site, and [all 7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor", "1 suspension, but I won't go into too much detail about my own", "negative enough, everyone that passes by seemingly wants to add to the user's", "it to be deleted by others, since if it's so bad clearly it", "voice it here): * MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives outside the", "have never seen such badly downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange network over", "only picked up the critic badge about 1 month ago (meaning I never", "won't go into too much detail about my own situation since I'm biased", "in (I have 1000+ rep on 7 sites and 150+ rep on 26", "goes negative enough, everyone that passes by seemingly wants to add to the", "the fence of violating the CoC and the policy of \"Be nice, Be", "sites). The post shown above had a net score of -11 when someone", "you feel you need to stab it further? In the latter case, my", "angers you so badly that you feel you need to stab it further?", "the question should be deleted (if so, why don't you vote to delete", "critic badge about 1 month ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone for about", "I picture this like someone that's already been beaten by the police, but", "enough already, and further downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful. It happened to", "already been beaten by the police, but long after the police have gone", "are one of the people that do this, for example downvoting a post", "here that when the number goes negative enough, everyone that passes by seemingly", "like, as long as it doesn't violate the CoC. However I believe there", "a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we", "picked up the critic badge about 1 month ago (meaning I never downvoted", "after the police have gone away, people that walk by the body on", "lead eventually to at least 1 suspension, but I won't go into too", "to stab it further? In the latter case, my personal opinion is that", "I don't expect everyone to share the same opinion as me. If you", "seems here that when the number goes negative enough, everyone that passes by", "commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed", "wait for it to be deleted by others, since if it's so bad", "such posts further into the ground, is it because you believe the question", "the CoC and the policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't", "as long as it doesn't violate the CoC. However I believe there comes", "can downvote when they like, as long as it doesn't violate the CoC.", "others (e.g. [Why my question gets so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and", "net score of -11 when someone decided to downvote it to -12, so", "such badly downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange network over about a decade", "Murder\"), I have never seen such badly downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange", "you believe the question should be deleted (if so, why don't you vote", "and only picked up the critic badge about 1 month ago (meaning I", "you don't have enough rep, just flag it or wait for it to", "decade of being here. Why does this community do this, and why is", "behavior is starting to tread on the fence of violating the CoC and", "you are one of the people that do this, for example downvoting a", "at which a post has been downvoted enough already, and further downvoting becomes", "so I wonder: If you are one of the people that pushes such", "downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to have a downvoting problem", "this site for over 2 years and only picked up the critic badge", "reaction that lead eventually to at least 1 suspension, but I won't go", "someone that's already been beaten by the police, but long after the police", "don't you vote to delete or if you don't have enough rep, just", "to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you think writing a stern comment can't", "general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen on the other sites that I'm", "downvote it to -12, so I wonder: If you are one of the", "up the critic badge about 1 month ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone", "equally active in (I have 1000+ rep on 7 sites and 150+ rep", "that pushes such posts further into the ground, is it because you believe", "if you don't have enough rep, just flag it or wait for it", "seen on the other sites that I'm equally active in (I have 1000+", "to -12, so I wonder: If you are one of the people that", "the body on the ground and see that the person has been reprimanded", "downvoting something which already has a very low negative score, can do successfully?", "should only be done in very exceptional circumstances: I've been on this site", "because you believe the question should be deleted (if so, why don't you", "chains, I wonder what you think writing a stern comment can't do, that", "happened to one of my answers recently, causing a chain reaction that lead", "for something, throw a couple extra kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange", "\"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when", "downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when the number goes", "eventually to at least 1 suspension, but I won't go into too much", "off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to have a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>)", "violating the CoC and the policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I", "believe the question should be deleted (if so, why don't you vote to", "think downvoting should only be done in very exceptional circumstances: I've been on", "Or do you usually do this because the post angers you so badly", "already has a net score below -2, can you provide me with some", "score, can do successfully?** To conclude my (personal) opinion on this issue (which", "dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A that", "not seen on the other sites that I'm equally active in (I have", "be deleted by others, since if it's so bad clearly it shouldn't be", "one of the people that do this, for example downvoting a post that", "don't have enough rep, just flag it or wait for it to be", "* Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter", "to the user's misery. I picture this like someone that's already been beaten", "\"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone to share the same", "me, and that people can downvote when they like, as long as it", "some insight as to why you do this)? Similar problems have been recognized", "score, but there's been zero issues on the site, and [all 7 moderator", "a post that already has a net score below -2, can you provide", "this, for example downvoting a post that already has a net score below", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study:", "downvoting a post that already has a net score below -2, can you", "on the site and it will quickly get deleted by others?)? Or do", "site, and [all 7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5):", "you vote to delete or if you don't have enough rep, just flag", "CoC and the policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't expect", "the police have gone away, people that walk by the body on the", "go into too much detail about my own situation since I'm biased there.", "Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to have a downvoting problem in", "the policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone to", "tolerated (if you are one of the people that do this, for example", "over about a decade of being here. Why does this community do this,", "rep, just flag it or wait for it to be deleted by others,", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when the number goes negative enough, everyone that", "negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you think writing a stern comment can't do,", "do you usually do this because the post angers you so badly that", "does this community do this, and why is it tolerated (if you are", "detail about my own situation since I'm biased there. Today I noticed another", "-11 when someone decided to downvote it to -12, so I wonder: If", "the CoC. However I believe there comes a point at which a post", "kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never", "or wait for it to be deleted by others, since if it's so", "never downvoted anyone for about 2 years). I appreciate that not everyone has", "stern comment can't do, that downvoting something which already has a very low", "I'm biased there. Today I noticed another relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows", "about a decade of being here. Why does this community do this, and", "if it's so bad clearly it shouldn't be on the site and it", "than helpful. It happened to one of my answers recently, causing a chain", "recently, causing a chain reaction that lead eventually to at least 1 suspension,", "been zero issues on the site, and [all 7 moderator candidates committed to", "enough rep, just flag it or wait for it to be deleted by", "my (personal) opinion on this issue (which I don't expect you to share,", "believe there comes a point at which a post has been downvoted enough", "chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when the number", "opinion on this issue (which I don't expect you to share, but I'd", "has been downvoted enough already, and further downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful.", "exceptional circumstances: I've been on this site for over 2 years and only", "downvote when they like, as long as it doesn't violate the CoC. However", "so, why don't you vote to delete or if you don't have enough", "the ground, is it because you believe the question should be deleted** (if", "wonder: If you are one of the people that pushes such posts further", "has a net score below -2, can you provide me with some insight", "or if you don't have enough rep, just flag it or wait for", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First", "becomes more harmful than helpful. It happened to one of my answers recently,", "not a downvote button. * Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down", "150+ rep on 26 sites). The post shown above had a net score", "[all 7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image", "do successfully? To conclude my (personal) opinion on this issue (which I don't", "1000+ rep on 7 sites and 150+ rep on 26 sites). The post", "(who clearly knows what they're doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter", "Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the", "it shouldn't be on the site and it will quickly get deleted by", "a net score of -11 when someone decided to downvote it to -12,", "vote to delete or if you don't have enough rep, just flag it", "further? In the latter case, my personal opinion is that the behavior is", "I noticed another relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows what they're doing) became", "downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen on the other", "same opinion as me. If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what", "It happened to one of my answers recently, causing a chain reaction that", "(which I don't expect you to share, but I'd like to voice it", "in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this", "but long after the police have gone away, people that walk by the", "couple extra kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I", "contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you think writing a stern comment", "beaten by the police, but long after the police have gone away, people", "is that the behavior is starting to tread on the fence of violating", "an upvote button, but not a downvote button. * Facebook has a like/thumbs-up", "(personal) opinion on this issue (which I don't expect you to share, but", "they like, as long as it doesn't violate the CoC. However I believe", "had a net score of -11 when someone decided to downvote it to", "7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description", "of violating the CoC and the policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but", "everyone that passes by seemingly wants to add to the user's misery. I", "fence of violating the CoC and the policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\",", "deleted by others, since if it's so bad clearly it shouldn't be on", "(\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never seen such badly downvoted posts on the", "number goes negative enough, everyone that passes by seemingly wants to add to", "case, my personal opinion is that the behavior is starting to tread on", "what they're doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)", "policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone to share", "to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are in bold. Thank you for your", "first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are in bold. Thank you", "about 1 month ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone for about 2 years).", "that lives outside the SE network) has an upvote button, but not a", "of -11 when someone decided to downvote it to -12, so I wonder:", "the Stack Exchange network over about a decade of being here. Why does", "my personal opinion is that the behavior is starting to tread on the", "Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the first", "since if it's so bad clearly it shouldn't be on the site and", "point at which a post has been downvoted enough already, and further downvoting", "noticed another relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows what they're doing) became the", "further into the ground, is it because you believe the question should be", "on this issue (which I don't expect you to share, but I'd like", "so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to have a", "downvote button. * Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. ", "pushes such posts further into the ground, is it because you believe the", "have 1000+ rep on 7 sites and 150+ rep on 26 sites). The", "that lead eventually to at least 1 suspension, but I won't go into", "It seems here that when the number goes negative enough, everyone that passes", "favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon", "that the behavior is starting to tread on the fence of violating the", "will quickly get deleted by others?)? Or do you usually do this because", "when the number goes negative enough, everyone that passes by seemingly wants to", "has been reprimanded for something, throw a couple extra kicks in. Apart from", "Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never seen such", "If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you think writing a", "user's misery. I picture this like someone that's already been beaten by the", "have a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen on", "done in very exceptional circumstances: I've been on this site for over 2", "but not a downvote button. Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but no", "question is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to", "active in (I have 1000+ rep on 7 sites and 150+ rep on", "very exceptional circumstances: I've been on this site for over 2 years and", "when someone decided to downvote it to -12, so I wonder: If you", "I believe there comes a point at which a post has been downvoted", "here. *Why does this community do this, and why is it tolerated (if", "answers recently, causing a chain reaction that lead eventually to at least 1", "long after the police have gone away, people that walk by the body", "but I'd like to voice it here): MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone", "and 150+ rep on 26 sites). The post shown above had a net", "To conclude my (personal) opinion on this issue (which I don't expect you", "network over about a decade of being here. Why does this community do", "the people that pushes such posts further into the ground, is it because", "issue (which I don't expect you to share, but I'd like to voice", "2 years). I appreciate that not everyone has the same opinion as me,", "do this, and why is it tolerated (if you are one of the", "this site seems to have a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I", "relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows what they're doing) became the \"victim\" of", "[Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A that have a net negative", "already has a very low negative score, can do successfully?** To conclude my", "for over 2 years and only picked up the critic badge about 1", "but no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no", "own situation since I'm biased there. Today I noticed another relatively high-rep user", "for example downvoting a post that already has a net score below -2,", "other sites that I'm equally active in (I have 1000+ rep on 7", "Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter Modeling", "Similar problems have been recognized by others (e.g. [Why my question gets so", "from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never seen such badly", "is it tolerated (if you are one of the people that do this,", "one of my answers recently, causing a chain reaction that lead eventually to", "user (who clearly knows what they're doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting:", "passes by seemingly wants to add to the user's misery. I picture this", "Stack Exchange network over about a decade of being here. Why does this", "post angers you so badly that you feel you need to stab it", "don't expect everyone to share the same opinion as me. If you contribute", "which already has a very low negative score, can do successfully? To conclude", "button. * Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At", "by the body on the ground and see that the person has been", "my question gets so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems", "a downvote button. * Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button.", "with some insight as to why you do this)?** Similar problems have been", "share, but I'd like to voice it here): * MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow", "least 1 suspension, but I won't go into too much detail about my", "In the latter case, my personal opinion is that the behavior is starting", "biased there. Today I noticed another relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows what", "became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here", "outside the SE network) has an upvote button, but not a downvote button.", "downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange network over about a decade of being", "starting to tread on the fence of violating the CoC and the policy", "site for over 2 years and only picked up the critic badge about", "people that do this, for example downvoting a post that already has a", "that's already been beaten by the police, but long after the police have", "of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone to share the", "over 2 years and only picked up the critic badge about 1 month", "CoC. However I believe there comes a point at which a post has", "This question is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer", "community do this, and why is it tolerated (if you are one of", "further downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful. It happened to one of my", "quickly get deleted by others?)? Or do you usually do this because the", "extra kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have", "comes a point at which a post has been downvoted enough already, and", "should be deleted (if so, why don't you vote to delete or if", "ground and see that the person has been reprimanded for something, throw a", "that do this, for example downvoting a post that already has a net", "others, since if it's so bad clearly it shouldn't be on the site", "and [all 7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter", "The post shown above had a net score of -11 when someone decided", "and it will quickly get deleted by others?)? Or do you usually do", "decided to downvote it to -12, so I wonder: If you are one", "wants to add to the user's misery. I picture this like someone that's", "SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A that have a net negative score, but", "of the people that pushes such posts further into the ground, is it", "for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially related:", "as me. If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you think", "badge about 1 month ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone for about 2", "the critic badge about 1 month ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone for", "the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are in bold. Thank", "to share the same opinion as me. If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains,", "(e.g. [Why my question gets so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this", "that passes by seemingly wants to add to the user's misery. I picture", "Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never seen such badly downvoted", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when the number goes negative enough, everyone", "has the same opinion as me, and that people can downvote when they", "question gets so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to", "I'd like to voice it here): * MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that", "stab it further? In the latter case, my personal opinion is that the", "provide me with some insight as to why you do this)? Similar problems", "2 years and only picked up the critic badge about 1 month ago", "everyone has the same opinion as me, and that people can downvote when", "I don't expect you to share, but I'd like to voice it here):", "do this, for example downvoting a post that already has a net score", "to downvote it to -12, so I wonder: If you are one of", "when they like, as long as it doesn't violate the CoC. However I", "by others, since if it's so bad clearly it shouldn't be on the", "to why you do this)? Similar problems have been recognized by others (e.g.", "that you feel you need to stab it further? In the latter case,", "I won't go into too much detail about my own situation since I'm", "that walk by the body on the ground and see that the person", "reprimanded for something, throw a couple extra kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack", "SE network) has an upvote button, but not a downvote button. * Facebook", "(a StackOverflow clone that lives outside the SE network) has an upvote button,", "candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note:", "what you think writing a stern comment can't do, that downvoting something which", "here): * MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives outside the SE network)", "have not seen on the other sites that I'm equally active in (I", "answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are in bold. Thank you for", "into the ground, is it because you believe the question should be deleted", "is Murder\"), I have never seen such badly downvoted posts on the Stack", "(if so, why don't you vote to delete or if you don't have", "in very exceptional circumstances: I've been on this site for over 2 years", "many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to have a downvoting", "I think downvoting should only be done in very exceptional circumstances: I've been", "rep on 26 sites). The post shown above had a net score of", "on the fence of violating the CoC and the policy of \"Be nice,", "by seemingly wants to add to the user's misery. I picture this like", "police have gone away, people that walk by the body on the ground", "zero issues on the site, and [all 7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting", "too much detail about my own situation since I'm biased there. Today I", "something, throw a couple extra kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta", "it here): * MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives outside the SE", "score of -11 when someone decided to downvote it to -12, so I", "lives outside the SE network) has an upvote button, but not a downvote", "so bad clearly it shouldn't be on the site and it will quickly", "(if you are one of the people that do this, for example downvoting", "flag it or wait for it to be deleted by others, since if", "much detail about my own situation since I'm biased there. Today I noticed", "but I don't expect everyone to share the same opinion as me. *If", " At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A that have a", "on 26 sites). The post shown above had a net score of -11", "usually do this because the post angers you so badly** that you feel", "has an upvote button, but not a downvote button. * Facebook has a", "have a net negative score, but there's been zero issues on the site,", "this community do this, and why is it tolerated (if you are one", "the user's misery. I picture this like someone that's already been beaten by", "someone decided to downvote it to -12, so I wonder: If you are", "they're doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It", "there's been zero issues on the site, and [all 7 moderator candidates committed", "tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My", "one of the people that pushes such posts further into the ground, is", "you need to stab it further? In the latter case, my personal opinion", "that people can downvote when they like, as long as it doesn't violate", "a net score below -2, can you provide me with some insight as", "this, and why is it tolerated (if you are one of the people", "score below -2, can you provide me with some insight as to why", "think writing a stern comment can't do, that downvoting something which already has", "as to why you do this)? Similar problems have been recognized by others", "and this site seems to have a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which", "latter case, my personal opinion is that the behavior is starting to tread", "harmful than helpful. It happened to one of my answers recently, causing a", "get deleted by others?)? Or do you usually do this because the post", "it because you believe the question should be deleted (if so, why don't", "nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone to share the same opinion", "post has been downvoted enough already, and further downvoting becomes more harmful than", "the people that do this, for example downvoting a post that already has", "sites that I'm equally active in (I have 1000+ rep on 7 sites", "I wonder: If you are one of the people that pushes such posts", "committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦", "another relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows what they're doing) became the \"victim\"", "a net negative score, but there's been zero issues on the site, and", "but there's been zero issues on the site, and [all 7 moderator candidates", "as me, and that people can downvote when they like, as long as", "knows what they're doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description", "* MATLAB Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives outside the SE network) has", "personal opinion is that the behavior is starting to tread on the fence", "successfully?** To conclude my (personal) opinion on this issue (which I don't expect", "walk by the body on the ground and see that the person has", "sites and 150+ rep on 26 sites). The post shown above had a", "are one of the people that pushes such posts further into the ground,", "problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen on the other sites", "the same opinion as me, and that people can downvote when they like,", "have absolutely no Q/A that have a net negative score, but there's been", "downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for upvoting:", "can't do, that downvoting something which already has a very low negative score,", "I'm equally active in (I have 1000+ rep on 7 sites and 150+", "that I'm equally active in (I have 1000+ rep on 7 sites and", "on the ground and see that the person has been reprimanded for something,", "to share, but I'd like to voice it here): * MATLAB Answers (a", "recognized by others (e.g. [Why my question gets so many downvotes? Is it", "badly downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange network over about a decade of", "to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has", "the number goes negative enough, everyone that passes by seemingly wants to add", "button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely", "However I believe there comes a point at which a post has been", "upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions are", "Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed", "StackOverflow clone that lives outside the SE network) has an upvote button, but", "that already has a net score below -2, can you provide me with", "the other sites that I'm equally active in (I have 1000+ rep on", "people can downvote when they like, as long as it doesn't violate the", "anyone for about 2 years). I appreciate that not everyone has the same", "do this because the post angers you so badly that you feel you", "on 7 sites and 150+ rep on 26 sites). The post shown above", "of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for", "it further? In the latter case, my personal opinion is that the behavior", "years and only picked up the critic badge about 1 month ago (meaning", "picture this like someone that's already been beaten by the police, but long", "because the post angers you so badly that you feel you need to", "which I have not seen on the other sites that I'm equally active", "upvote button, but not a downvote button. * Facebook has a like/thumbs-up button", "comment can't do, that downvoting something which already has a very low negative", "of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when the", "net score below -2, can you provide me with some insight as to", "it or wait for it to be deleted by others, since if it's", "First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards", "person has been reprimanded for something, throw a couple extra kicks in. Apart", "[Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1). My 4 sub-questions", "you to share, but I'd like to voice it here): * MATLAB Answers", "Why does this community do this, and why is it tolerated (if you", "ground, is it because you believe the question should be deleted (if so,", "the same opinion as me. If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder", "month ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone for about 2 years). I appreciate", "feel you need to stab it further? In the latter case, my personal", "downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful. It happened to one of my answers", "net negative score, but there's been zero issues on the site, and [all", "the behavior is starting to tread on the fence of violating the CoC", "Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never seen such badly downvoted posts", "seems to have a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not", "never seen such badly downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange network over about", "be done in very exceptional circumstances: I've been on this site for over", "do, that downvoting something which already has a very low negative score, can", "to delete or if you don't have enough rep, just flag it or", "moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of downvoting](https://mattermodeling.meta.stackexchange.com/q/141/5): [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)", "button. * At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A that have", "a couple extra kicks in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"),", "Q/A that have a net negative score, but there's been zero issues on", "to add to the user's misery. I picture this like someone that's already", "people that pushes such posts further into the ground, is it because you", "a point at which a post has been downvoted enough already, and further", "Today I noticed another relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows what they're doing)", "circumstances: I've been on this site for over 2 years and only picked", "being here. Why does this community do this, and why is it tolerated", "this like someone that's already been beaten by the police, but long after", "only be done in very exceptional circumstances: I've been on this site for", "Be welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone to share the same opinion as", "above had a net score of -11 when someone decided to downvote it", "me. If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you think writing", "clone that lives outside the SE network) has an upvote button, but not", "have enough rep, just flag it or wait for it to be deleted", "that not everyone has the same opinion as me, and that people can", "it doesn't violate the CoC. However I believe there comes a point at", "the latter case, my personal opinion is that the behavior is starting to", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that when the number goes negative", "you usually do this because the post angers you so badly that you", "the site, and [all 7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in favor of", "downvoted enough already, and further downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful. It happened", "violate the CoC. However I believe there comes a point at which a", "to be deleted by others, since if it's so bad clearly it shouldn't", "my own situation since I'm biased there. Today I noticed another relatively high-rep", "badly that you feel you need to stab it further? In the latter", "share the same opinion as me. If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I", "years). I appreciate that not everyone has the same opinion as me, and", "you do this)? Similar problems have been recognized by others (e.g. [Why my", "the post angers you so badly that you feel you need to stab", "I've been on this site for over 2 years and only picked up", "and see that the person has been reprimanded for something, throw a couple", "upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer Bias](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4414/93303). This question is also tangentially related: [Are", "be on the site and it will quickly get deleted by others?)? *Or", "enough, everyone that passes by seemingly wants to add to the user's misery.", "a stern comment can't do, that downvoting something which already has a very", "expect you to share, but I'd like to voice it here): MATLAB", "At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A that have a net", "ago (meaning I never downvoted anyone for about 2 years). I appreciate that", "of my answers recently, causing a chain reaction that lead eventually to at", "a chain reaction that lead eventually to at least 1 suspension, but I", "gone away, people that walk by the body on the ground and see", "and the policy of \"Be nice, Be welcoming\", but I don't expect everyone", "to at least 1 suspension, but I won't go into too much detail", "to tread on the fence of violating the CoC and the policy of", "a decade of being here. Why does this community do this, and why", "conclude my (personal) opinion on this issue (which I don't expect you to", "in. Apart from Meta Stack Exchange (\"Meta is Murder\"), I have never seen", "on the other sites that I'm equally active in (I have 1000+ rep", "(I have 1000+ rep on 7 sites and 150+ rep on 26 sites).", "posts further into the ground, is it because you believe the question should", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BxipS.png) Note: cag51♦ has observed this phenomenon for upvoting: [Case Study: First Answer", "there comes a point at which a post has been downvoted enough already,", "seen such badly downvoted posts on the Stack Exchange network over about a", "is starting to tread on the fence of violating the CoC and the", "Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com) we have absolutely no Q/A that have a net negative score,", "it's so bad clearly it shouldn't be on the site and it will", "not everyone has the same opinion as me, and that people can downvote", "site and it will quickly get deleted by others?)? Or do you usually", "that downvoting something which already has a very low negative score, can do", "why is it tolerated (if you are one of the people that do", "shown above had a net score of -11 when someone decided to downvote", "and why is it tolerated (if you are one of the people that", "suspension, but I won't go into too much detail about my own situation", "me with some insight as to why you do this)? Similar problems have", "to have a downvoting problem in general (<https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/search?q=downvoting>) which I have not seen", "you think writing a stern comment can't do, that downvoting something which already", "no Q/A that have a net negative score, but there's been zero issues", "this issue (which I don't expect you to share, but I'd like to", "something which already has a very low negative score, can do successfully?** To", "also tangentially related: [Are upvotes skewed towards the first answer to a question?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/3826/are-upvotes-skewed-towards-the-first-answer-to-a-question?noredirect=1&lq=1).", "misery. I picture this like someone that's already been beaten by the police,", "has a like/thumbs-up button but no dislike/thumbs-down button. * At [Matter Modeling SE](https://materials.stackexchange.com)", "high-rep user (who clearly knows what they're doing) became the \"victim\" of chain-reaction", "the \"victim\" of chain-reaction downvoting: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/XtwhV.png) It seems here that", "appreciate that not everyone has the same opinion as me, and that people", "absolutely no Q/A that have a net negative score, but there's been zero", "been downvoted enough already, and further downvoting becomes more harmful than helpful. It", "see that the person has been reprimanded for something, throw a couple extra", "as it doesn't violate the CoC. However I believe there comes a point", "and that people can downvote when they like, as long as it doesn't", "deleted (if so, why don't you vote to delete or if you don't", "to one of my answers recently, causing a chain reaction that lead eventually", "about 2 years). I appreciate that not everyone has the same opinion as", "bad clearly it shouldn't be on the site and it will quickly get", "writing a stern comment can't do, that downvoting something which already has a", "the police, but long after the police have gone away, people that walk", "-12, so I wonder: If you are one of the people that pushes", "doesn't violate the CoC. However I believe there comes a point at which", "why you do this)? Similar problems have been recognized by others (e.g. [Why", "been beaten by the police, but long after the police have gone away,", "is it because you believe the question should be deleted (if so, why", "negative score, can do successfully? To conclude my (personal) opinion on this issue", "7 sites and 150+ rep on 26 sites). The post shown above had", "example downvoting a post that already has a net score below -2, can", "that have a net negative score, but there's been zero issues on the", "insight as to why you do this)? Similar problems have been recognized by", "on the Stack Exchange network over about a decade of being here. Why", "opinion as me. If you contribute to negative-downvoting chains, I wonder what you", "has a very low negative score, can do successfully? To conclude my (personal)", "Personally I think downvoting should only be done in very exceptional circumstances: I've", "there. Today I noticed another relatively high-rep user (who clearly knows what they're", "since I'm biased there. Today I noticed another relatively high-rep user (who clearly", "by the police, but long after the police have gone away, people that", "Exchange network over about a decade of being here. Why does this community", "why don't you vote to delete or if you don't have enough rep,", "more harmful than helpful. It happened to one of my answers recently, causing", "don't expect you to share, but I'd like to voice it here): ", "police, but long after the police have gone away, people that walk by", "issues on the site, and [all 7 moderator candidates committed to commenting/close-voting/delete-voting in", "gets so many downvotes? Is it off-topic?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/2065/93303)) and this site seems to have", "Answers (a StackOverflow clone that lives outside the SE network) has an upvote", "it will quickly get deleted by others?)? Or do you usually do this", "this)?* Similar problems have been recognized by others (e.g. [Why my question gets" ]
[ "serious issue with these kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact", "to become the head of department of a Oxford faculty, but the questions", "(in most countries) and utterly unethical information to be pushed and promoted in", "utterly unethical information to be pushed and promoted in our page. Furthering a", "is, that these questions are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the world", "normal, and I have been living in a bubble? --- \\It is provably", "And I have met almost no PhD student that worked on average more", "the normal thing, and we can say the same about overworking PhD students", "times, particularly after my PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting to further my", "we do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is there", "how that can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes from", "need more to become the head of department of a Oxford faculty, but", "a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes from PhD students or prospective PhD", "them but survived it is not an excuse to go telling others that", "My worry is not false information being spread, but actually illegal (in most", "that students need more than 40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps you need", "PhDs and some of them are academics now. This is in top 10%", "UK universities. late edit: Just to clarify, I understand why people work more", "worried or actually overworked. My worry is, that these questions are generally answered", "than 40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps you need more to become the", "questions are about getting a PhD. I have known lazy outright not smart", "is bad. No wonder [36% of PhD students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1).", "we just leave it as it is and let people answer/upvote this, in", "of essentially worker exploitation is bad. No wonder [36% of PhD students suffer", "students need more than 40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps you need more", "is not an excuse to go telling others that that is the normal", "students that are worried or actually overworked. My worry is, that these questions", "(not even sure its a different problem even). Yet we do. So, aside", "can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes from PhD students", "mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for help we say \"this", "PhD\". I understand that academic world is diverse with lots of subcultures, however,", "of them are academics now. This is in top 10% UK universities. late", "I am (somehow) attempting to further my academic CV, while the vast majority", "academic world is diverse with lots of subcultures, however, in my experience this", "this page about it? Should we just leave it as it is and", "these kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact that some of", "overwhelming academic opinion that this is normal, and I have been living in", "a PhD. Perhaps you need more to become the head of department of", "linking) about PhD student workload expectations and how that can compare to a", "job. Generally, this comes from PhD students or prospective PhD students that are", "say the same about overworking PhD students (not even sure its a different", "opinion that this is normal, and I have been living in a bubble?", "of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact that some of us may", "particularly after my PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting to further my academic", "and all of them successfully got their PhDs and some of them are", "an excuse to go telling others that that is the normal thing, and", "and some of them are academics now. This is in top 10% UK", "or prospective PhD students that are worried or actually overworked. My worry is,", "false\\. My worry is not false information being spread, but actually illegal (in", "get a PhD. Perhaps you need more to become the head of department", "things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact that some of us may had", "has a serious issue with these kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and", "almost no PhD student that worked on average more than 40h/w and all", "is completely and utterly false\\. My worry is not false information being spread,", "kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact that some of us", "is there anything we can/should do in this page about it? Should we", "generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the world of superstars, you need to", "for long period of times, particularly after my PhD. But I am (somehow)", "universities. late edit: Just to clarify, I understand why people work more than", "we can/should do in this page about it? Should we just leave it", "PhD. Perhaps you need more to become the head of department of a", "us may had them but survived it is not an excuse to go", "that worked 10h/w in the engineering field obtain PhDs. And I have met", "This is in top 10% UK universities. late edit: Just to clarify, I", "bubble? --- \\It is provably false that students need more than 40h/w to", "a culture of essentially worker exploitation is bad. No wonder [36% of PhD", "and let people answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is", "is provably false that students need more than 40h/w to get a PhD.", "smart people that worked 10h/w in the engineering field obtain PhDs. And I", "their PhDs and some of them are academics now. This is in top", "we say \"this is how its supposed to be\". Academia has a serious", "have met almost no PhD student that worked on average more than 40h/w", "you will never get your PhD\". I understand that academic world is diverse", "no PhD student that worked on average more than 40h/w and all of", "for help we say \"this is how its supposed to be\". Academia has", "has been few questions (that I will avoid linking) about PhD student workload", "with lots of subcultures, however, in my experience this is completely and utterly", "be\". Academia has a serious issue with these kind of things. Abusive supervisors", "issue with these kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact that", "fact that some of us may had them but survived it is not", "some of them are academics now. This is in top 10% UK universities.", "page. Furthering a culture of essentially worker exploitation is bad. No wonder [36%", "some of us may had them but survived it is not an excuse", "work more than that and I have myself worked more than 40h/w for", "pushed and promoted in our page. Furthering a culture of essentially worker exploitation", "few questions (that I will avoid linking) about PhD student workload expectations and", "different problem even). Yet we do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting a highly", "department of a Oxford faculty, but the questions are about getting a PhD.", "that worked on average more than 40h/w and all of them successfully got", "avoid linking) about PhD student workload expectations and how that can compare to", "leave it as it is and let people answer/upvote this, in my opinion,", "in my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is it really the overwhelming academic", "understand why people work more than that and I have myself worked more", "say \"this is how its supposed to be\". Academia has a serious issue", "I have myself worked more than 40h/w for long period of times, particularly", "angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is there anything we can/should do in", "never get your PhD\". I understand that academic world is diverse with lots", "the overwhelming academic opinion that this is normal, and I have been living", "and the fact that some of us may had them but survived it", "known lazy outright not smart people that worked 10h/w in the engineering field", "about PhD student workload expectations and how that can compare to a \"normal\"", "prospective PhD students that are worried or actually overworked. My worry is, that", "to the world of superstars, you need to work 60h/w or you will", "may had them but survived it is not an excuse to go telling", "unethical information to be pushed and promoted in our page. Furthering a culture", "is and let people answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or", "in our page. Furthering a culture of essentially worker exploitation is bad. No", "need to work 60h/w or you will never get your PhD\". I understand", "aside of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is there anything we can/should", "worked more than 40h/w for long period of times, particularly after my PhD.", "Furthering a culture of essentially worker exploitation is bad. No wonder [36% of", "essentially worker exploitation is bad. No wonder [36% of PhD students suffer from", "long period of times, particularly after my PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting", "questions (that I will avoid linking) about PhD student workload expectations and how", "this comes from PhD students or prospective PhD students that are worried or", "I understand that academic world is diverse with lots of subcultures, however, in", "to be pushed and promoted in our page. Furthering a culture of essentially", "compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes from PhD students or", "same about overworking PhD students (not even sure its a different problem even).", "to go telling others that that is the normal thing, and we can", "actually illegal (in most countries) and utterly unethical information to be pushed and", "a serious issue with these kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the", "are worried or actually overworked. My worry is, that these questions are generally", "your PhD\". I understand that academic world is diverse with lots of subcultures,", "go telling others that that is the normal thing, and we can say", "its supposed to be\". Academia has a serious issue with these kind of", "student that worked on average more than 40h/w and all of them successfully", "let people answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is it", "answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is it really the", "and utterly false\\. My worry is not false information being spread, but actually", "upvoted answers, is there anything we can/should do in this page about it?", "that academic world is diverse with lots of subcultures, however, in my experience", "of a Oxford faculty, but the questions are about getting a PhD. I", "a highly upvoted answers, is there anything we can/should do in this page", "when asking for help we say \"this is how its supposed to be\".", "[36% of PhD students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when", "But I am (somehow) attempting to further my academic CV, while the vast", "in a bubble? --- \\It is provably false that students need more than", "culture of essentially worker exploitation is bad. No wonder [36% of PhD students", "supposed to be\". Academia has a serious issue with these kind of things.", "top 10% UK universities. late edit: Just to clarify, I understand why people", "40h/w and all of them successfully got their PhDs and some of them", "not an excuse to go telling others that that is the normal thing,", "the same about overworking PhD students (not even sure its a different problem", "Yet we do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is", "and promoted in our page. Furthering a culture of essentially worker exploitation is", "and I have been living in a bubble? --- \\It is provably false", "my PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting to further my academic CV, while", "Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for help we say \"this is how its", "40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps you need more to become the head", "field obtain PhDs. And I have met almost no PhD student that worked", "advise? Or is it really the overwhelming academic opinion that this is normal,", "others that that is the normal thing, and we can say the same", "worker exploitation is bad. No wonder [36% of PhD students suffer from mental", "after my PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting to further my academic CV,", "are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the world of superstars, you need", "or you will never get your PhD\". I understand that academic world is", "and I have myself worked more than 40h/w for long period of times,", "these questions are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the world of superstars,", "more than 40h/w and all of them successfully got their PhDs and some", "living in a bubble? --- \\It is provably false that students need more", "Oxford faculty, but the questions are about getting a PhD. I have known", "more than 40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps you need more to become", "obtain PhDs. And I have met almost no PhD student that worked on", "welcome to the world of superstars, you need to work 60h/w or you", "excuse to go telling others that that is the normal thing, and we", "(that I will avoid linking) about PhD student workload expectations and how that", "workload expectations and how that can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally,", "are academics now. This is in top 10% UK universities. late edit: Just", "it is and let people answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite unethical advise?", "Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact that some of us may had them", "comes from PhD students or prospective PhD students that are worried or actually", "myself worked more than 40h/w for long period of times, particularly after my", "had them but survived it is not an excuse to go telling others", "but actually illegal (in most countries) and utterly unethical information to be pushed", "more than that and I have myself worked more than 40h/w for long", "am (somehow) attempting to further my academic CV, while the vast majority of", "being spread, but actually illegal (in most countries) and utterly unethical information to", "to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes from PhD students or prospective", "and when asking for help we say \"this is how its supposed to", "diverse with lots of subcultures, however, in my experience this is completely and", "of department of a Oxford faculty, but the questions are about getting a", "false that students need more than 40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps you", "normal thing, and we can say the same about overworking PhD students (not", "head of department of a Oxford faculty, but the questions are about getting", "PhD. I have known lazy outright not smart people that worked 10h/w in", "to clarify, I understand why people work more than that and I have", "thing, and we can say the same about overworking PhD students (not even", "exploitation is bad. No wonder [36% of PhD students suffer from mental health", "or actually overworked. My worry is, that these questions are generally answered with", "students (not even sure its a different problem even). Yet we do. So,", "expectations and how that can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this", "My worry is, that these questions are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to", "work 60h/w or you will never get your PhD\". I understand that academic", "further my academic CV, while the vast majority of PhD students are not.", "than that and I have myself worked more than 40h/w for long period", "information being spread, but actually illegal (in most countries) and utterly unethical information", "I have been living in a bubble? --- \\It is provably false that", "actually overworked. My worry is, that these questions are generally answered with \"Yeah,", "and utterly unethical information to be pushed and promoted in our page. Furthering", "from PhD students or prospective PhD students that are worried or actually overworked.", "Just to clarify, I understand why people work more than that and I", "PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting to further my academic CV, while the", "about overworking PhD students (not even sure its a different problem even). Yet", "anything we can/should do in this page about it? Should we just leave", "60h/w or you will never get your PhD\". I understand that academic world", "that some of us may had them but survived it is not an", "not smart people that worked 10h/w in the engineering field obtain PhDs. And", "edit: Just to clarify, I understand why people work more than that and", "answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the world of superstars, you need to work", "in the engineering field obtain PhDs. And I have met almost no PhD", "Generally, this comes from PhD students or prospective PhD students that are worried", "more than 40h/w for long period of times, particularly after my PhD. But", "of subcultures, however, in my experience this is completely and utterly false\\. My", "information to be pushed and promoted in our page. Furthering a culture of", "you need to work 60h/w or you will never get your PhD\". I", "faculty, but the questions are about getting a PhD. I have known lazy", "on average more than 40h/w and all of them successfully got their PhDs", "students or prospective PhD students that are worried or actually overworked. My worry", "why people work more than that and I have myself worked more than", "that is the normal thing, and we can say the same about overworking", "to work 60h/w or you will never get your PhD\". I understand that", "not false information being spread, but actually illegal (in most countries) and utterly", "the world of superstars, you need to work 60h/w or you will never", "to be\". Academia has a serious issue with these kind of things. Abusive", "more to become the head of department of a Oxford faculty, but the", "I will avoid linking) about PhD student workload expectations and how that can", "them are academics now. This is in top 10% UK universities. late edit:", "questions are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the world of superstars, you", "PhD student that worked on average more than 40h/w and all of them", "world is diverse with lots of subcultures, however, in my experience this is", "illegal (in most countries) and utterly unethical information to be pushed and promoted", "and we can say the same about overworking PhD students (not even sure", "about getting a PhD. I have known lazy outright not smart people that", "is not false information being spread, but actually illegal (in most countries) and", "countries) and utterly unethical information to be pushed and promoted in our page.", "just leave it as it is and let people answer/upvote this, in my", "it? Should we just leave it as it is and let people answer/upvote", "the engineering field obtain PhDs. And I have met almost no PhD student", "completely and utterly false\\. My worry is not false information being spread, but", "outright not smart people that worked 10h/w in the engineering field obtain PhDs.", "do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is there anything", "survived it is not an excuse to go telling others that that is", "engineering field obtain PhDs. And I have met almost no PhD student that", "of superstars, you need to work 60h/w or you will never get your", "how its supposed to be\". Academia has a serious issue with these kind", "the fact that some of us may had them but survived it is", "Academia has a serious issue with these kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist,", "utterly false\\. My worry is not false information being spread, but actually illegal", "is diverse with lots of subcultures, however, in my experience this is completely", "as it is and let people answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite unethical", "world of superstars, you need to work 60h/w or you will never get", "a PhD. I have known lazy outright not smart people that worked 10h/w", "it is not an excuse to go telling others that that is the", "\"this is how its supposed to be\". Academia has a serious issue with", "people work more than that and I have myself worked more than 40h/w", "PhDs. And I have met almost no PhD student that worked on average", "average more than 40h/w and all of them successfully got their PhDs and", "wonder [36% of PhD students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and", "can/should do in this page about it? Should we just leave it as", "this, in my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is it really the overwhelming", "of them successfully got their PhDs and some of them are academics now.", "met almost no PhD student that worked on average more than 40h/w and", "that that is the normal thing, and we can say the same about", "PhD students that are worried or actually overworked. My worry is, that these", "need more than 40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps you need more to", "about it? Should we just leave it as it is and let people", "student workload expectations and how that can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job.", "period of times, particularly after my PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting to", "attempting to further my academic CV, while the vast majority of PhD students", "in top 10% UK universities. late edit: Just to clarify, I understand why", "supervisors exist, and the fact that some of us may had them but", "do in this page about it? Should we just leave it as it", "worked 10h/w in the engineering field obtain PhDs. And I have met almost", "that and I have myself worked more than 40h/w for long period of", "opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is it really the overwhelming academic opinion that", "of times, particularly after my PhD. But I am (somehow) attempting to further", "a different problem even). Yet we do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting a", "is the normal thing, and we can say the same about overworking PhD", "highly upvoted answers, is there anything we can/should do in this page about", "however, in my experience this is completely and utterly false\\. My worry is", "Perhaps you need more to become the head of department of a Oxford", "is normal, and I have been living in a bubble? --- \\It is", "really the overwhelming academic opinion that this is normal, and I have been", "donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is there anything we can/should do in this", "students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for help", "to get a PhD. Perhaps you need more to become the head of", "than 40h/w and all of them successfully got their PhDs and some of", "but survived it is not an excuse to go telling others that that", "a Oxford faculty, but the questions are about getting a PhD. I have", "worry is, that these questions are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the", "promoted in our page. Furthering a culture of essentially worker exploitation is bad.", "false information being spread, but actually illegal (in most countries) and utterly unethical", "of us may had them but survived it is not an excuse to", "have myself worked more than 40h/w for long period of times, particularly after", "to further my academic CV, while the vast majority of PhD students are", "a bubble? --- \\It is provably false that students need more than 40h/w", "Should we just leave it as it is and let people answer/upvote this,", "that can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes from PhD", "even sure its a different problem even). Yet we do. So, aside of", "but the questions are about getting a PhD. I have known lazy outright", "understand that academic world is diverse with lots of subcultures, however, in my", "get your PhD\". I understand that academic world is diverse with lots of", "provably false that students need more than 40h/w to get a PhD. Perhaps", "my experience this is completely and utterly false\\. My worry is not false", "late edit: Just to clarify, I understand why people work more than that", "\"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes from PhD students or prospective PhD students", "them successfully got their PhDs and some of them are academics now. This", "it really the overwhelming academic opinion that this is normal, and I have", "with \"Yeah, welcome to the world of superstars, you need to work 60h/w", "subcultures, however, in my experience this is completely and utterly false\\. My worry", "that are worried or actually overworked. My worry is, that these questions are", "of PhD students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking", "most countries) and utterly unethical information to be pushed and promoted in our", "of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is there anything we can/should do", "overworked. My worry is, that these questions are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome", "got their PhDs and some of them are academics now. This is in", "is in top 10% UK universities. late edit: Just to clarify, I understand", "Recently there has been few questions (that I will avoid linking) about PhD", "Or is it really the overwhelming academic opinion that this is normal, and", "\"Yeah, welcome to the world of superstars, you need to work 60h/w or", "overworking PhD students (not even sure its a different problem even). Yet we", "this is completely and utterly false\\. My worry is not false information being", "lots of subcultures, however, in my experience this is completely and utterly false\\.", "in this page about it? Should we just leave it as it is", "become the head of department of a Oxford faculty, but the questions are", "my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is it really the overwhelming academic opinion", "can say the same about overworking PhD students (not even sure its a", "and how that can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w job. Generally, this comes", "we can say the same about overworking PhD students (not even sure its", "all of them successfully got their PhDs and some of them are academics", "is how its supposed to be\". Academia has a serious issue with these", "our page. Furthering a culture of essentially worker exploitation is bad. No wonder", "this is normal, and I have been living in a bubble? --- \\It", "bad. No wonder [36% of PhD students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked,", "underpaid, and when asking for help we say \"this is how its supposed", "help we say \"this is how its supposed to be\". Academia has a", "I have met almost no PhD student that worked on average more than", "PhD students or prospective PhD students that are worried or actually overworked. My", "you need more to become the head of department of a Oxford faculty,", "10h/w in the engineering field obtain PhDs. And I have met almost no", "will never get your PhD\". I understand that academic world is diverse with", "issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for help we say \"this is how", "that these questions are generally answered with \"Yeah, welcome to the world of", "successfully got their PhDs and some of them are academics now. This is", "telling others that that is the normal thing, and we can say the", "worked on average more than 40h/w and all of them successfully got their", "PhD students (not even sure its a different problem even). Yet we do.", "the head of department of a Oxford faculty, but the questions are about", "are about getting a PhD. I have known lazy outright not smart people", "there has been few questions (that I will avoid linking) about PhD student", "PhD student workload expectations and how that can compare to a \"normal\" 40h/w", "worry is not false information being spread, but actually illegal (in most countries)", "it as it is and let people answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite", "now. This is in top 10% UK universities. late edit: Just to clarify,", "quite unethical advise? Or is it really the overwhelming academic opinion that this", "people answer/upvote this, in my opinion, quite unethical advise? Or is it really", "will avoid linking) about PhD student workload expectations and how that can compare", "experience this is completely and utterly false\\. My worry is not false information", "academic opinion that this is normal, and I have been living in a", "No wonder [36% of PhD students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid,", "sure its a different problem even). Yet we do. So, aside of angrily", "academics now. This is in top 10% UK universities. late edit: Just to", "answers, is there anything we can/should do in this page about it? Should", "spread, but actually illegal (in most countries) and utterly unethical information to be", "PhD students suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for", "asking for help we say \"this is how its supposed to be\". Academia", "from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for help we say", "its a different problem even). Yet we do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting", "exist, and the fact that some of us may had them but survived", "page about it? Should we just leave it as it is and let", "40h/w job. Generally, this comes from PhD students or prospective PhD students that", "\\It is provably false that students need more than 40h/w to get a", "even). Yet we do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers,", "in my experience this is completely and utterly false\\. My worry is not", "lazy outright not smart people that worked 10h/w in the engineering field obtain", "been living in a bubble? --- \\It is provably false that students need", "than 40h/w for long period of times, particularly after my PhD. But I", "health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for help we say \"this is", "--- \\It is provably false that students need more than 40h/w to get", "that this is normal, and I have been living in a bubble? ---", "40h/w for long period of times, particularly after my PhD. But I am", "with these kind of things. Abusive supervisors exist, and the fact that some", "clarify, I understand why people work more than that and I have myself", "been few questions (that I will avoid linking) about PhD student workload expectations", "I have known lazy outright not smart people that worked 10h/w in the", "10% UK universities. late edit: Just to clarify, I understand why people work", "superstars, you need to work 60h/w or you will never get your PhD\".", "people that worked 10h/w in the engineering field obtain PhDs. And I have", "suffer from mental health issues](https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03489-1). Overworked, underpaid, and when asking for help we", "(somehow) attempting to further my academic CV, while the vast majority of PhD", "there anything we can/should do in this page about it? Should we just", "have been living in a bubble? --- \\It is provably false that students", "have known lazy outright not smart people that worked 10h/w in the engineering", "getting a PhD. I have known lazy outright not smart people that worked", "unethical advise? Or is it really the overwhelming academic opinion that this is", "be pushed and promoted in our page. Furthering a culture of essentially worker", "the questions are about getting a PhD. I have known lazy outright not", "is it really the overwhelming academic opinion that this is normal, and I", "I understand why people work more than that and I have myself worked", "problem even). Yet we do. So, aside of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted", "So, aside of angrily donwvoting a highly upvoted answers, is there anything we" ]
[ "highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not count. Neither do things", "or whether there is anything else you propose to change. (If yes, please", "implement a policy against these.* This should only affect a small fraction of", "the above criteria have already been deleted or redacted, so there will be", "accurate and severe, they simply do not belong here. We can help you", "be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I do not want to", "is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and", "questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot be solved by editing the question as", "a policy against these. This should only affect a small fraction of questions", "blogs, etc.). Such questions can be re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised. However,", "a lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation", "fraction of questions that cause a disproportionate amount of trouble. In this post,", "the question apparently allows others to identify the target or* allows the target", "bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I do not want to give them extra", "account name. Does this mean I am forced to make a sockpuppet to", "not where the problems with such questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot be", "action requiring two moderators), or escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the question", "will delete a question without warning if all of the following apply: ", "4. The asker did not ask the question in good faith. 5. The", "a huge amount of debate. 4. The asker did not ask the question", "the things which requests for moderator action usually are about – since those", "discussion about such a question. I am an experienced user using my", "delete a question without warning if all of the following apply: It", "question in good faith. 5. The question should be closed for being opinion-based,", "Moreover, these problems cannot be solved by editing the question as the information", "includes the asker’s username and thus all questions asked by users with what", "or delete it, do so. Rationale ========= Going by experience, for almost every", "neither suited nor intended as a news platform. Even if your allegations are", "primarily prevents answers, which is not where the problems with such questions are.", "platform. Even if your allegations are completely accurate and severe, they simply do", "the better. Just ensure that your accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). ", "am forced to make a sockpuppet to ask such a question? – Yes.", "to avoid the issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from asking", "closed for being opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending on individual factors. 6.", "The question abuses this site as platform for public shaming. As a result,", "the username can be changed, there are restrictions on this and it can", "all questions asked by users with what looks like a real name. This", "do not want to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion", "anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still be unsuitable for this site for several", "extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about such a question. * I", "to change. (If yes, please post an answer.) Policy ====== Moderators will delete", "within our control and only our control. (Note that while the username can", "there are restrictions on this and it can still be visible through comment", "widely reported or discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can be", "using my real name as my account name. Does this mean I am", "against named individuals or organisations, we moderators would like to implement a policy", "Questions I would like to answer ================================ * Why doesn’t closing suffice? –", "post content and username are the things which requests for moderator action usually", "I would like to answer ================================ * Why doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing", "and then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from asking a valid question. In", "this post, we are asking if you see any problems with the proposed", "result, such questions cause a lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in", "you can additionally vote to close or delete it, do so. Rationale =========", "in good faith. 5. The question should be closed for being opinion-based, a", "this site for several reasons. When you encounter such a question, please: ", "of debate. 4. The asker did not ask the question in good faith.", "ask such a question? – Yes. This is a valid use of sockpuppets", "* Why does identifying information only count when it is in question or", "strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I do not want to give", "causes a huge amount of debate. 4. The asker did not ask the", "through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring an SE employee) or redaction requests", "are completely accurate and severe, they simply do not belong here. We can", "be a person, university, journal, publisher, company, or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734),", "username? For example, what if I can identify the asker via their profile", "====== Moderators will delete a question without warning if all of the following", "to this policy is the quickest way to start with a clean state.", "a valid question. In Cases 4–6, no big harm is done by deleting.", "soon regrets posting the question. 2. The question harms the asker. 3. The", "amount of debate. 4. The asker did not ask the question in good", "two moderators), or escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the question can be", "Cases 4–6, no big harm is done by deleting. Questions I would like", " Leave a guiding comment linking to this policy. * Flag it for", "Why don’t you give any examples for such questions? – Most previous questions", "be anonymised to avoid the issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented", "Most previous questions matching the above criteria have already been deleted or redacted,", "since those are the things that are within our control and only our", "a real name. This can be through explicit naming, a clear relation to", "Thus nobody is prevented from asking a valid question. In Cases 4–6, no", "we are asking if you see any problems with the proposed policy or", "clean state. * Why does identifying information only count when it is in", "valid use of sockpuppets and it’s probably for the better. Just ensure that", "The information in the question apparently allows others to identify the target or", "posting the question. 2. The question harms the asker. 3. The question causes", "draw a line somewhere. Also the post content and username are the things", "a news platform. Even if your allegations are completely accurate and severe, they", "beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive research. This includes the asker’s username and", "I am forced to make a sockpuppet to ask such a question? –", "like to implement a policy against these.* This should only affect a small", "i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or highly unprofessional.", "of sockpuppets and it’s probably for the better. Just ensure that your accounts", "belong here. We can help you with how to deal with them, but", "– Yes. This is a valid use of sockpuppets and it’s probably for", "an answer.) Policy ====== Moderators will delete a question without warning if all", "are restrictions on this and it can still be visible through comment replies", "can be anonymised to avoid the issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody is", "the asker’s username and thus all questions asked by users with what looks", "on individual factors. 6. The question abuses this site as platform for public", "As a result, such questions cause a lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation", "Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not count. Neither do things like “Is", "have already been deleted or redacted, so there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias)", "doubt without intensive research. This includes the asker’s username and thus all questions", "asker did not ask the question in good faith. 5. The question should", "here. We can help you with how to deal with them, but we", "to implement a policy against these.* This should only affect a small fraction", "question? – Yes. This is a valid use of sockpuppets and it’s probably", "with questions that contain allegations against named individuals or organisations, we moderators would", "to identify the asker beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive research. This includes", "research. This includes the asker’s username and thus all questions asked by users", "quickest way to start with a clean state. * Why does identifying information", "moderator action usually are about – since those are the things that are", "which requests for moderator action usually are about – since those are the", "things like “Is Publisher X* predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations, but they", "individual target, which can be a person, university, journal, publisher, company, or similar.", "like “Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations, but they should", "As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. * The allegations are severe, i.e.,", "or similar?* – We cannot predict every research angle at this and have", "Even if your allegations are completely accurate and severe, they simply do not", "media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can be re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised.", "experience, for almost every such question at least one of the following applies:", "individual factors. 6. The question abuses this site as platform for public shaming.", "about such a question. * I am an experienced user using my real", "allegations on an individual target,* which can be a person, university, journal, publisher,", "from asking a valid question. In Cases 4–6, no big harm is done", "anything else you propose to change. (If yes, please post an answer.)* Policy", "users with what looks like a real name. This can be through explicit", "a small fraction of questions that cause a disproportionate amount of trouble. In", "still be visible through comment replies and similar.) * Why don’t you give", "identify the target or* allows the target to identify the asker beyond any", "use of sockpuppets and it’s probably for the better. Just ensure that your", "that are within our control and only our control. (Note that while the", "This should only affect a small fraction of questions that cause a disproportionate", "apply: It contains allegations on an individual target, which can be a", "can identify the asker via their profile or similar?* – We cannot predict", "did not ask the question in good faith. 5. The question should be", "prevents answers, which is not where the problems with such questions are. Moreover,", "apparently allows others to identify the target or allows the target to identify", "good faith. 5. The question should be closed for being opinion-based, a shopping", "are within our control and only our control. (Note that while the username", "asker beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive research. This includes the asker’s username", "paper title, or similar. * The allegations have not already been widely reported", "similar. * The allegations have not already been widely reported or discussed (on", "decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. * The allegations are severe, i.e., the", "others to identify the target or allows the target to identify the asker", "criteria have already been deleted or redacted, so there will be strong [survival", "be closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The", "to make a sockpuppet to ask such a question?* – Yes. This is", "not ask the question in good faith. 5. The question should be closed", "questions that cause a disproportionate amount of trouble. In this post, we are", "problems with such questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot be solved by editing", "We can help you with how to deal with them, but we do", "these problems cannot be solved by editing the question as the information still", "can be a person, university, journal, publisher, company, or similar. As decided separately", "do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is censorship. The world must know", " This is censorship. The world must know the truth about … –", "information in the question apparently allows others to identify the target or allows", "it for moderator attention. * If you can additionally vote to close or", "(e.g., their supervisor), a paper title, or similar. * The allegations have not", "such a question?* – Yes. This is a valid use of sockpuppets and", "the quickest way to start with a clean state. * Why does identifying", "in question or username? For example, what if I can identify the asker", "that your accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). This is censorship. The", "would like to implement a policy against these. This should only affect a", "asking a valid question. In Cases 4–6, no big harm is done by", "an individual target,* which can be a person, university, journal, publisher, company, or", "sockpuppets and it’s probably for the better. Just ensure that your accounts do", "problems with questions that contain allegations against named individuals or organisations, we moderators", "identify the asker beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive research. This includes the", "…* – This site is neither suited nor intended as a news platform.", "completely accurate and severe, they simply do not belong here. We can help", "encounter such a question, please: * Leave a guiding comment linking to this", "post, we are asking if you see any problems with the proposed policy", "or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The information in the question apparently allows others", "reported or discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can be re-asked", "solved by editing the question as the information still sticks around. Deletion with", "still sticks around. Deletion with a clear reference to this policy is the", "particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring an SE employee) or redaction", "question, please: * Leave a guiding comment linking to this policy. * Flag", "the question as the information still sticks around. Deletion with a clear reference", "comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the question can be anonymised to avoid the", "and have to draw a line somewhere. Also the post content and username", "This includes the asker’s username and thus all questions asked by users with", "and thus all questions asked by users with what looks like a real", "================================ * Why doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing primarily prevents answers, which is", "It contains allegations on an individual target, which can be a person, university,", "can be re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still", "allegations against named individuals or organisations, we moderators would like to implement a", "a disproportionate amount of trouble. In this post, we are asking if you", "Moderators will delete a question without warning if all of the following apply:", "it is in question or username? For example, what if I can identify", "deleted or redacted, so there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection.", "allegations are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical", "else you propose to change. (If yes, please post an answer.)* Policy ======", "one of the following applies: 1. The asker soon regrets posting the question.", "the information still sticks around. Deletion with a clear reference to this policy", "to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about such a", "replies and similar.) * Why don’t you give any examples for such questions?", "* Why don’t you give any examples for such questions? – Most previous", "the question. 2. The question harms the asker. 3. The question causes a", "not already been widely reported or discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.). Such", "information only count when it is in question or username? For example, what", "things that are within our control and only our control. (Note that while", "this policy. * Flag it for moderator attention. * If you can additionally", "or escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the question can be anonymised to", "does identifying information only count when it is in question or username? For", "(an action requiring two moderators), or escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the", "reference to this policy is the quickest way to start with a clean", "organisations, we moderators would like to implement a policy against these.* This should", "simply do not belong here. We can help you with how to deal", "are about – since those are the things that are within our control", "this site as platform for public shaming. As a result, such questions cause", "site for several reasons. When you encounter such a question, please: Leave", "on this and it can still be visible through comment replies and similar.)", "moderators would like to implement a policy against these.* This should only affect", "with a clear reference to this policy is the quickest way to start", "the selection. Moreover, I do not want to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734)", "like a real name. This can be through explicit naming, a clear relation", "a clear relation to the named author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper title,", "relation to the named author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper title, or similar.", "Rationale ========= Going by experience, for almost every such question at least one", "this mean I am forced to make a sockpuppet to ask such a", "similar.) Why don’t you give any examples for such questions? – Most", "every such question at least one of the following applies: 1. The asker", "severe accusations, but they should still be closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734)", "questions may still be unsuitable for this site for several reasons. When you", "* Flag it for moderator attention. * If you can additionally vote to", "what looks like a real name. This can be through explicit naming, a", "The asker soon regrets posting the question. 2. The question harms the asker.", "ensure that your accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is censorship.", "3. The question causes a huge amount of debate. 4. The asker did", "unless containing specific severe accusations, but they should still be closed as a", "Does this mean I am forced to make a sockpuppet to ask such", "with the proposed policy or whether there is anything else you propose to", "5. The question should be closed for being opinion-based, a shopping question, or", "where the problems with such questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot be solved", "they should still be closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping", "trouble. In this post, we are asking if you see any problems with", "can help you with how to deal with them, but we do not", "work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring an SE employee)", "prevented from asking a valid question. In Cases 4–6, no big harm is", "and it’s probably for the better. Just ensure that your accounts do not", "interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). This is censorship. The world must know the truth", "target or* allows the target to identify the asker beyond any reasonable doubt", "to draw a line somewhere. Also the post content and username are the", "to identify the target or allows the target to identify the asker beyond", "the target or allows the target to identify the asker beyond any reasonable", "Why doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing primarily prevents answers, which is not where", "can still be visible through comment replies and similar.) * Why don’t you", "re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still be unsuitable", "any problems with the proposed policy or whether there is anything else you", "following apply: It contains allegations on an individual target, which can be", "issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from asking a valid question.", "policy is the quickest way to start with a clean state. * Why", "[shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). The information in the question apparently allows others to identify", "requiring two moderators), or escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the question can", "for public shaming. As a result, such questions cause a lot of unnecessary", "question apparently allows others to identify the target or allows the target to", "restrictions on this and it can still be visible through comment replies and", "by editing the question as the information still sticks around. Deletion with a", "am an experienced user using my real name as my account name. Does", "at this and have to draw a line somewhere. Also the post content", "includes self-allegations. * The allegations are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct,", "if you see any problems with the proposed policy or whether there is", "of the following applies: 1. The asker soon regrets posting the question. 2.", "allows others to identify the target or allows the target to identify the", "not want to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about", "For example, what if I can identify the asker via their profile or", "warning if all of the following apply: * It contains allegations on an", "action requiring an SE employee) or redaction requests (an action requiring two moderators),", "usually are about – since those are the things that are within our", "so there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I do", "almost every such question at least one of the following applies: 1. The", "by deleting. Questions I would like to answer ================================ * Why doesn’t closing", "give any examples for such questions? – Most previous questions matching the above", "exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about such a question. * I am", "[Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). This is censorship. The world must know the truth about", "site is neither suited nor intended as a news platform. Even if your", "huge amount of debate. 4. The asker did not ask the question in", "or similar. The allegations have not already been widely reported or discussed", "ask the question in good faith. 5. The question should be closed for", "profile or similar?* – We cannot predict every research angle at this and", "cause a lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation,", "following applies: 1. The asker soon regrets posting the question. 2. The question", "for almost every such question at least one of the following applies: 1.", "and username are the things which requests for moderator action usually are about", "that while the username can be changed, there are restrictions on this and", "abuses this site as platform for public shaming. As a result, such questions", "a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The information in the", "control and only our control. (Note that while the username can be changed,", "a clear reference to this policy is the quickest way to start with", "control. (Note that while the username can be changed, there are restrictions on", "suffice?* – Closing primarily prevents answers, which is not where the problems with", "mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not count. Neither do things like “Is Publisher", "a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The information in the question apparently allows others to", "escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the question can be anonymised to avoid", "censorship. The world must know the truth about …* – This site is", "already been widely reported or discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions", "is not where the problems with such questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot", "the named author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper title, or similar. * The", "a paper title, or similar. * The allegations have not already been widely", "etc.). Such questions can be re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised", "for such questions?* – Most previous questions matching the above criteria have already", "nor intended as a news platform. Even if your allegations are completely accurate", "when they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still be unsuitable for", "of unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an", "the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest", "intended as a news platform. Even if your allegations are completely accurate and", "action usually are about – since those are the things that are within", "– since those are the things that are within our control and only", "a clean state. * Why does identifying information only count when it is", "is anything else you propose to change. (If yes, please post an answer.)", "explicit naming, a clear relation to the named author (e.g., their supervisor), a", "they simply do not belong here. We can help you with how to", "big harm is done by deleting. Questions I would like to answer ================================", "still be unsuitable for this site for several reasons. When you encounter such", "2. The question harms the asker. 3. The question causes a huge amount", "question causes a huge amount of debate. 4. The asker did not ask", "give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about such a question.", "or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. * The allegations are", "matching the above criteria have already been deleted or redacted, so there will", "for several reasons. When you encounter such a question, please: * Leave a", "should be closed for being opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending on individual", "site as platform for public shaming. As a result, such questions cause a", "allows the target to identify the asker beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive", "research angle at this and have to draw a line somewhere. Also the", "Neither do things like “Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations,", "every research angle at this and have to draw a line somewhere. Also", "should still be closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734).", "editing the question as the information still sticks around. Deletion with a clear", "this policy is the quickest way to start with a clean state. ", "journal, publisher, company, or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. ", "be changed, there are restrictions on this and it can still be visible", "a shopping question, or depending on individual factors. 6. The question abuses this", "quirks do not count. Neither do things like “Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless", "Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations, but they should still be", "be closed for being opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending on individual factors.", "Moreover, I do not want to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a", "re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from asking a valid question. In Cases 4–6,", "name as my account name. Does this mean I am forced to make", "or highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not", "things which requests for moderator action usually are about – since those are", "identifying information only count when it is in question or username? For example,", "when it is in question or username? For example, what if I can", "as a news platform. Even if your allegations are completely accurate and severe,", "harms the asker. 3. The question causes a huge amount of debate. 4.", "there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I do not", "the things that are within our control and only our control. (Note that", "must know the truth about …* – This site is neither suited nor", "X predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations, but they should still be closed", "a question without warning if all of the following apply: * It contains", "severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or highly", "named author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper title, or similar. * The allegations", "linking to this policy. * Flag it for moderator attention. * If you", "world must know the truth about …* – This site is neither suited", "via their profile or similar?* – We cannot predict every research angle at", "and similar.) * Why don’t you give any examples for such questions? –", "by experience, for almost every such question at least one of the following", "a guiding comment linking to this policy. * Flag it for moderator attention.", "through explicit naming, a clear relation to the named author (e.g., their supervisor),", "any reasonable doubt without intensive research. This includes the asker’s username and thus", "allegations have not already been widely reported or discussed (on news media, blogs,", "in the question apparently allows others to identify the target or allows the", "unsuitable for this site for several reasons. When you encounter such a question,", "with such questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot be solved by editing the", "and only our control. (Note that while the username can be changed, there", "question abuses this site as platform for public shaming. As a result, such", "predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations, but they should still be closed as", "question without warning if all of the following apply: * It contains allegations", "(an action requiring an SE employee) or redaction requests (an action requiring two", "example, what if I can identify the asker via their profile or similar?", "the following applies: 1. The asker soon regrets posting the question. 2. The", "The allegations are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly", "through comment replies and similar.) Why don’t you give any examples for", "do not belong here. We can help you with how to deal with", "for the better. Just ensure that your accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734).", "When you encounter such a question, please: Leave a guiding comment linking", "answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators will delete a question without warning if all of", "being opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending on individual factors. 6. The question", "our control. (Note that while the username can be changed, there are restrictions", "* The information in the question apparently allows others to identify the target", "cannot predict every research angle at this and have to draw a line", "unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not count. Neither do things like", "the question in good faith. 5. The question should be closed for being", "are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or", "is the quickest way to start with a clean state. * Why does", "problems cannot be solved by editing the question as the information still sticks", "but they should still be closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a", "reasonable doubt without intensive research. This includes the asker’s username and thus all", "against these. This should only affect a small fraction of questions that cause", "may still be unsuitable for this site for several reasons. When you encounter", "disassociation requests (an action requiring an SE employee) or redaction requests (an action", "Flag it for moderator attention. If you can additionally vote to close", "what if I can identify the asker via their profile or similar?* –", "asker. 3. The question causes a huge amount of debate. 4. The asker", "content and username are the things which requests for moderator action usually are", "of questions that cause a disproportionate amount of trouble. In this post, we", "been widely reported or discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can", "or discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can be re-asked when", "The question causes a huge amount of debate. 4. The asker did not", "are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still be unsuitable for this site", "questions asked by users with what looks like a real name. This can", "be re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still be", "of the following apply: * It contains allegations on an individual target, which", "Deletion with a clear reference to this policy is the quickest way to", "to recurring problems with questions that contain allegations against named individuals or organisations,", "I can identify the asker via their profile or similar?* – We cannot", "4–6, no big harm is done by deleting. Questions I would like to", "disproportionate amount of trouble. In this post, we are asking if you see", "predict every research angle at this and have to draw a line somewhere.", "This can be through explicit naming, a clear relation to the named author", "can be changed, there are restrictions on this and it can still be", "this and it can still be visible through comment replies and similar.) ", "which is not where the problems with such questions are. Moreover, these problems", "sticks around. Deletion with a clear reference to this policy is the quickest", "– Most previous questions matching the above criteria have already been deleted or", "anonymised to avoid the issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from", "separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. The allegations are severe, i.e., the reported", "are. Moreover, these problems cannot be solved by editing the question as the", "and moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring an", "in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring an SE employee) or", "should only affect a small fraction of questions that cause a disproportionate amount", "or redaction requests (an action requiring two moderators), or escalating comment debates. In", "nobody is prevented from asking a valid question. In Cases 4–6, no big", "requests (an action requiring two moderators), or escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3,", "questions matching the above criteria have already been deleted or redacted, so there", "amount of trouble. In this post, we are asking if you see any", "around. Deletion with a clear reference to this policy is the quickest way", "changed, there are restrictions on this and it can still be visible through", "to ask such a question?* – Yes. This is a valid use of", "* The allegations are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or", "target to identify the asker beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive research. This", "such question at least one of the following applies: 1. The asker soon", "If you can additionally vote to close or delete it, do so. Rationale", "probably for the better. Just ensure that your accounts do not interact. [Further", "of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The information in the question apparently", "individuals or organisations, we moderators would like to implement a policy against these.", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). The information in the question apparently allows others to identify the", "reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is censorship. The world must know the truth about …", "news platform. Even if your allegations are completely accurate and severe, they simply", "these.* This should only affect a small fraction of questions that cause a", "– We cannot predict every research angle at this and have to draw", "previous questions matching the above criteria have already been deleted or redacted, so", "proposed policy or whether there is anything else you propose to change. (If", "visible through comment replies and similar.) Why don’t you give any examples", "depending on individual factors. 6. The question abuses this site as platform for", "without warning if all of the following apply: It contains allegations on", "how to deal with them, but we do not need names for that.", "no big harm is done by deleting. Questions I would like to answer", "for being opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending on individual factors. 6. The", "or redacted, so there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover,", "(on news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can be re-asked when they are", "by users with what looks like a real name. This can be through", "be visible through comment replies and similar.) * Why don’t you give any", "please: Leave a guiding comment linking to this policy. * Flag it", "for moderator action usually are about – since those are the things that", "be solved by editing the question as the information still sticks around. Deletion", "an SE employee) or redaction requests (an action requiring two moderators), or escalating", "1. The asker soon regrets posting the question. 2. The question harms the", "self-allegations. * The allegations are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal,", "question. * I am an experienced user using my real name as my", "angle at this and have to draw a line somewhere. Also the post", "shaming. As a result, such questions cause a lot of unnecessary grievance and", "our control and only our control. (Note that while the username can be", "as the information still sticks around. Deletion with a clear reference to this", "naming, a clear relation to the named author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper", "it can still be visible through comment replies and similar.) Why don’t", "experienced user using my real name as my account name. Does this mean", "allegations are completely accurate and severe, they simply do not belong here. We", "Due to recurring problems with questions that contain allegations against named individuals or", "count when it is in question or username? For example, what if I", "change. (If yes, please post an answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators will delete a", "the issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from asking a valid", "your allegations are completely accurate and severe, they simply do not belong here.", "as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The information in", "In Cases 4–6, no big harm is done by deleting. Questions I would", "a valid use of sockpuppets and it’s probably for the better. Just ensure", "accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is censorship. The world must", "question at least one of the following applies: 1. The asker soon regrets", "name. This can be through explicit naming, a clear relation to the named", "please post an answer.) Policy ====== Moderators will delete a question without warning", "highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not count.", "* Why doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing primarily prevents answers, which is not", "such a question, please: * Leave a guiding comment linking to this policy.", "behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness,", "“Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations, but they should still", "if your allegations are completely accurate and severe, they simply do not belong", "looks like a real name. This can be through explicit naming, a clear", "employee) or redaction requests (an action requiring two moderators), or escalating comment debates.", "question as the information still sticks around. Deletion with a clear reference to", "delete it, do so. Rationale ========= Going by experience, for almost every such", "Such questions can be re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions", "still be closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). ", "debate. 4. The asker did not ask the question in good faith. 5.", "grievance and moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring", "severe, they simply do not belong here. We can help you with how", "The asker did not ask the question in good faith. 5. The question", "is in question or username? For example, what if I can identify the", "least one of the following applies: 1. The asker soon regrets posting the", "the target to identify the asker beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive research.", "asker via their profile or similar? – We cannot predict every research angle", "or organisations, we moderators would like to implement a policy against these.* This", "identify the asker via their profile or similar? – We cannot predict every", "news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can be re-asked when they are sufficiently", "have to draw a line somewhere. Also the post content and username are", "closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The information", "recurring problems with questions that contain allegations against named individuals or organisations, we", "publisher, company, or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. * The", "valid question. In Cases 4–6, no big harm is done by deleting. Questions", "or allows the target to identify the asker beyond any reasonable doubt without", "to this policy. * Flag it for moderator attention. * If you can", "platform for public shaming. As a result, such questions cause a lot of", "clear reference to this policy is the quickest way to start with a", "as platform for public shaming. As a result, such questions cause a lot", "Closing primarily prevents answers, which is not where the problems with such questions", "your accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is censorship. The world", "the post content and username are the things which requests for moderator action", "harm is done by deleting. Questions I would like to answer ================================ ", "count. Neither do things like “Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing specific severe", "the proposed policy or whether there is anything else you propose to change.", "sloppiness, and quirks do not count. Neither do things like “Is Publisher X", "The question harms the asker. 3. The question causes a huge amount of", "a line somewhere. Also the post content and username are the things which", "person, university, journal, publisher, company, or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes", "without intensive research. This includes the asker’s username and thus all questions asked", "affect a small fraction of questions that cause a disproportionate amount of trouble.", "state. * Why does identifying information only count when it is in question", "and quirks do not count. Neither do things like “Is Publisher X* predatory?”,", "vote to close or delete it, do so. Rationale ========= Going by experience,", "post an answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators will delete a question without warning if", "do things like “Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing specific severe accusations, but", "my account name. Does this mean I am forced to make a sockpuppet", "them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about such a question. ", "applies: 1. The asker soon regrets posting the question. 2. The question harms", "to answer ================================ Why doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing primarily prevents answers,", "can be through explicit naming, a clear relation to the named author (e.g.,", "(Note that while the username can be changed, there are restrictions on this", "it’s probably for the better. Just ensure that your accounts do not interact.", "while the username can be changed, there are restrictions on this and it", "a question, please: * Leave a guiding comment linking to this policy. ", "regrets posting the question. 2. The question harms the asker. 3. The question", "Yes. This is a valid use of sockpuppets and it’s probably for the", "the question can be anonymised to avoid the issues and then re-asked. Thus", "In this post, we are asking if you see any problems with the", "start with a clean state. Why does identifying information only count when", "reasons. When you encounter such a question, please: Leave a guiding comment", "requiring an SE employee) or redaction requests (an action requiring two moderators), or", "any examples for such questions?* – Most previous questions matching the above criteria", "about – since those are the things that are within our control and", "* The allegations have not already been widely reported or discussed (on news", "target, which can be a person, university, journal, publisher, company, or similar. As", "whether there is anything else you propose to change. (If yes, please post", "university, journal, publisher, company, or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations.", "this and have to draw a line somewhere. Also the post content and", "then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from asking a valid question. In Cases", "SE employee) or redaction requests (an action requiring two moderators), or escalating comment", "guiding comment linking to this policy. * Flag it for moderator attention. ", "with a clean state. Why does identifying information only count when it", "containing specific severe accusations, but they should still be closed as a duplicate", "comment replies and similar.) Why don’t you give any examples for such", "know the truth about … – This site is neither suited nor intended", "been deleted or redacted, so there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the", "or depending on individual factors. 6. The question abuses this site as platform", "is done by deleting. Questions I would like to answer ================================ * Why", "6. The question abuses this site as platform for public shaming. As a", "already been deleted or redacted, so there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in", "moderator attention. If you can additionally vote to close or delete it,", "public shaming. As a result, such questions cause a lot of unnecessary grievance", "Cases 1–3, the question can be anonymised to avoid the issues and then", "only count when it is in question or username? For example, what if", "as my account name. Does this mean I am forced to make a", "Policy ====== Moderators will delete a question without warning if all of the", "policy or whether there is anything else you propose to change. (If yes,", "don’t you give any examples for such questions?* – Most previous questions matching", "cause a disproportionate amount of trouble. In this post, we are asking if", "a result, such questions cause a lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation work,", "asked by users with what looks like a real name. This can be", "question. 2. The question harms the asker. 3. The question causes a huge", "you propose to change. (If yes, please post an answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators", "small fraction of questions that cause a disproportionate amount of trouble. In this", "discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.). Such questions can be re-asked when they", "* It contains allegations on an individual target, which can be a person,", "question can be anonymised to avoid the issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody", "We cannot predict every research angle at this and have to draw a", "– This site is neither suited nor intended as a news platform. Even", "and severe, they simply do not belong here. We can help you with", "The allegations have not already been widely reported or discussed (on news media,", "be unsuitable for this site for several reasons. When you encounter such a", "the asker beyond any reasonable doubt without intensive research. This includes the asker’s", "This is a valid use of sockpuppets and it’s probably for the better.", "[Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about such a question. * I am an", "the asker via their profile or similar? – We cannot predict every research", "not count. Neither do things like “Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing specific", "to close or delete it, do so. Rationale ========= Going by experience, for", "such a question. * I am an experienced user using my real name", "an experienced user using my real name as my account name. Does this", "self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring an SE employee) or redaction requests (an", "shopping question, or depending on individual factors. 6. The question abuses this site", "only affect a small fraction of questions that cause a disproportionate amount of", "they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still be unsuitable for this", "with how to deal with them, but we do not need names for", "similar? – We cannot predict every research angle at this and have to", "which can be a person, university, journal, publisher, company, or similar. As decided", "such questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot be solved by editing the question", "Just ensure that your accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is", "with what looks like a real name. This can be through explicit naming,", "problems with the proposed policy or whether there is anything else you propose", "question, or depending on individual factors. 6. The question abuses this site as", "asking if you see any problems with the proposed policy or whether there", "accusations, but they should still be closed as a duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). The information in the question apparently allows", "misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks", "I am an experienced user using my real name as my account name.", "suited nor intended as a news platform. Even if your allegations are completely", "the asker. 3. The question causes a huge amount of debate. 4. The", "that cause a disproportionate amount of trouble. In this post, we are asking", "lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests", "answers, which is not where the problems with such questions are. Moreover, these", "The question should be closed for being opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending", "The world must know the truth about … – This site is neither", "close or delete it, do so. Rationale ========= Going by experience, for almost", "their profile or similar?* – We cannot predict every research angle at this", "anonymised questions may still be unsuitable for this site for several reasons. When", "do so. Rationale ========= Going by experience, for almost every such question at", "would like to answer ================================ * Why doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing primarily", "somewhere. Also the post content and username are the things which requests for", "can additionally vote to close or delete it, do so. Rationale ========= Going", "way to start with a clean state. * Why does identifying information only", "only our control. (Note that while the username can be changed, there are", "will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I do not want", "similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. The allegations are severe,", "we moderators would like to implement a policy against these.* This should only", "you give any examples for such questions? – Most previous questions matching the", "not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This is censorship. The world must know the", "have not already been widely reported or discussed (on news media, blogs, etc.).", "if all of the following apply: It contains allegations on an individual", "at least one of the following applies: 1. The asker soon regrets posting", "answer ================================ * Why doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing primarily prevents answers, which", "In Cases 1–3, the question can be anonymised to avoid the issues and", "question. In Cases 4–6, no big harm is done by deleting. Questions I", "in the selection. Moreover, I do not want to give them extra exposure.", "contains allegations on an individual target, which can be a person, university, journal,", "for this site for several reasons. When you encounter such a question, please:", "questions can be re-asked when they are sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may", "sufficiently anonymised. However, anonymised questions may still be unsuitable for this site for", "Leave a guiding comment linking to this policy. * Flag it for moderator", "yes, please post an answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators will delete a question without", "are asking if you see any problems with the proposed policy or whether", "factors. 6. The question abuses this site as platform for public shaming. As", "several reasons. When you encounter such a question, please: * Leave a guiding", "doesn’t closing suffice?* – Closing primarily prevents answers, which is not where the", "redacted, so there will be strong [survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I", "line somewhere. Also the post content and username are the things which requests", "that contain allegations against named individuals or organisations, we moderators would like to", "This site is neither suited nor intended as a news platform. Even if", "closing suffice?* – Closing primarily prevents answers, which is not where the problems", "questions?* – Most previous questions matching the above criteria have already been deleted", "examples for such questions?* – Most previous questions matching the above criteria have", "moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action requiring an SE", "is a meta discussion about such a question. * I am an experienced", "name. Does this mean I am forced to make a sockpuppet to ask", "is prevented from asking a valid question. In Cases 4–6, no big harm", "username can be changed, there are restrictions on this and it can still", "1–3, the question can be anonymised to avoid the issues and then re-asked.", "unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not count. Neither", "of trouble. In this post, we are asking if you see any problems", "[survival bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) in the selection. Moreover, I do not want to give them", "a sockpuppet to ask such a question? – Yes. This is a valid", "the problems with such questions are. Moreover, these problems cannot be solved by", "contain allegations against named individuals or organisations, we moderators would like to implement", "for moderator attention. * If you can additionally vote to close or delete", "faith. 5. The question should be closed for being opinion-based, a shopping question,", "is a valid use of sockpuppets and it’s probably for the better. Just", "you with how to deal with them, but we do not need names", "question or username? For example, what if I can identify the asker via", "additionally vote to close or delete it, do so. Rationale ========= Going by", "selection. Moreover, I do not want to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is", "or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do not count. Neither do", "question harms the asker. 3. The question causes a huge amount of debate.", "such questions?* – Most previous questions matching the above criteria have already been", "asker soon regrets posting the question. 2. The question harms the asker. 3.", "information still sticks around. Deletion with a clear reference to this policy is", "mean I am forced to make a sockpuppet to ask such a question?", "such questions cause a lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in particular", "not belong here. We can help you with how to deal with them,", "make a sockpuppet to ask such a question? – Yes. This is a", "========= Going by experience, for almost every such question at least one of", "all of the following apply: * It contains allegations on an individual target,", "do not count. Neither do things like “Is Publisher X predatory?”, unless containing", "thus all questions asked by users with what looks like a real name.", "above criteria have already been deleted or redacted, so there will be strong", "Also the post content and username are the things which requests for moderator", "the truth about …* – This site is neither suited nor intended as", "intensive research. This includes the asker’s username and thus all questions asked by", "questions cause a lot of unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in particular through", "better. Just ensure that your accounts do not interact. [Further reading](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3944/7734). * This", "author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper title, or similar. The allegations have", "a question. * I am an experienced user using my real name as", "forced to make a sockpuppet to ask such a question? – Yes. This", "help you with how to deal with them, but we do not need", "or username? For example, what if I can identify the asker via their", "requests (an action requiring an SE employee) or redaction requests (an action requiring", "* I am an experienced user using my real name as my account", "This is censorship. The world must know the truth about …* – This", "sockpuppet to ask such a question?* – Yes. This is a valid use", "opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending on individual factors. 6. The question abuses", "However, anonymised questions may still be unsuitable for this site for several reasons.", "duplicate of [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/83764/7734) or a [shopping question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/3657/7734). * The information in the question", "like to answer ================================ * Why doesn’t closing suffice? – Closing primarily prevents", "redaction requests (an action requiring two moderators), or escalating comment debates. In Cases", "username and thus all questions asked by users with what looks like a", "are the things that are within our control and only our control. (Note", "see any problems with the proposed policy or whether there is anything else", "real name. This can be through explicit naming, a clear relation to the", "* If you can additionally vote to close or delete it, do so.", "question should be closed for being opinion-based, a shopping question, or depending on", "are the things which requests for moderator action usually are about – since", "clear relation to the named author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper title, or", "Going by experience, for almost every such question at least one of the", "so. Rationale ========= Going by experience, for almost every such question at least", "Why does identifying information only count when it is in question or username?", "their supervisor), a paper title, or similar. The allegations have not already", "to start with a clean state. * Why does identifying information only count", "– Closing primarily prevents answers, which is not where the problems with such", "unnecessary grievance and moderation work, in particular through self-vandalisation, disassociation requests (an action", "if I can identify the asker via their profile or similar? – We", "be through explicit naming, a clear relation to the named author (e.g., their", "debates. In Cases 1–3, the question can be anonymised to avoid the issues", "questions that contain allegations against named individuals or organisations, we moderators would like", "named individuals or organisations, we moderators would like to implement a policy against", "on an individual target, which can be a person, university, journal, publisher, company,", "a person, university, journal, publisher, company, or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this", "those are the things that are within our control and only our control.", "done by deleting. Questions I would like to answer ================================ * Why doesn’t", "policy against these. This should only affect a small fraction of questions that", "specific severe accusations, but they should still be closed as a duplicate of", "user using my real name as my account name. Does this mean I", "a meta discussion about such a question. I am an experienced user", "truth about … – This site is neither suited nor intended as a", "real name as my account name. Does this mean I am forced to", "asker’s username and thus all questions asked by users with what looks like", "meta discussion about such a question. * I am an experienced user using", "it, do so. Rationale ========= Going by experience, for almost every such question", "comment linking to this policy. Flag it for moderator attention. * If", "(If yes, please post an answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators will delete a question", "want to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta discussion about such", "criminal, or highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes, sloppiness, and quirks do", "there is anything else you propose to change. (If yes, please post an", "deleting. Questions I would like to answer ================================ * Why doesn’t closing suffice?", "and it can still be visible through comment replies and similar.) * Why", "to the named author (e.g., their supervisor), a paper title, or similar. ", "moderators), or escalating comment debates. In Cases 1–3, the question can be anonymised", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. * The allegations are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour", "I do not want to give them extra exposure. [Here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4385/7734) is a meta", "is neither suited nor intended as a news platform. Even if your allegations", "this includes self-allegations. * The allegations are severe, i.e., the reported behaviour is", "username are the things which requests for moderator action usually are about –", "you see any problems with the proposed policy or whether there is anything", "a question?* – Yes. This is a valid use of sockpuppets and it’s", "avoid the issues and then re-asked. Thus nobody is prevented from asking a", "requests for moderator action usually are about – since those are the things", "reported behaviour is misconduct, criminal, or highly unethical or highly unprofessional. Honest mistakes,", "is censorship. The world must know the truth about …* – This site", "about …* – This site is neither suited nor intended as a news", "the following apply: * It contains allegations on an individual target, which can", "attention. * If you can additionally vote to close or delete it, do", "propose to change. (If yes, please post an answer.)* Policy ====== Moderators will", "policy. * Flag it for moderator attention. * If you can additionally vote", "company, or similar. As decided separately [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4767/7734), this includes self-allegations. * The allegations", "supervisor), a paper title, or similar. * The allegations have not already been", "you encounter such a question, please: * Leave a guiding comment linking to", "cannot be solved by editing the question as the information still sticks around.", "my real name as my account name. Does this mean I am forced", "title, or similar. * The allegations have not already been widely reported or" ]
[ "wiki and adding information. [Can public political criticism of my alma mater result", "now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by editing the wiki and adding", "first draft of the requested canonical question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help", "a question \"What are the criteria for degree revocation?\" and close all questions", "Can we create a question \"What are the criteria for degree revocation?\" and", "by editing the wiki and adding information. [Can public political criticism of my", "political criticism of my alma mater result in my BA being revoked 35", "my BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question \"What", "degree revocation?\" and close all questions with the theme \"Will my degree be", "my alma mater result in my BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can", "the theme \"Will my degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think this", "if...?\" as duplicates? I think this will reduce the time wasted on debating", "later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question \"What are the criteria for degree revocation?\"", "we create a question \"What are the criteria for degree revocation?\" and close", "revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question \"What are the criteria", "[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by editing the wiki and adding information. [Can", "information. [Can public political criticism of my alma mater result in my BA", "us out by editing the wiki and adding information. [Can public political criticism", "public political criticism of my alma mater result in my BA being revoked", "BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question \"What are", "the wiki and adding information. [Can public political criticism of my alma mater", "question \"What are the criteria for degree revocation?\" and close all questions with", "alma mater result in my BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we", "result in my BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a", "wasted on debating individuals views and behavior which are not relevant to academia,", "all questions with the theme \"Will my degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates?", "[Can public political criticism of my alma mater result in my BA being", "the requested canonical question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by", "criticism of my alma mater result in my BA being revoked 35 years", "as duplicates? I think this will reduce the time wasted on debating individuals", "revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think this will reduce the time wasted on", "time wasted on debating individuals views and behavior which are not relevant to", "are not relevant to academia, while making good use of the better quality", "this will reduce the time wasted on debating individuals views and behavior which", "requested canonical question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by editing", "the criteria for degree revocation?\" and close all questions with the theme \"Will", "questions with the theme \"Will my degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I", "theme \"Will my degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think this will", "years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question \"What are the criteria for degree", "for degree revocation?\" and close all questions with the theme \"Will my degree", "individuals views and behavior which are not relevant to academia, while making good", "and adding information. [Can public political criticism of my alma mater result in", "35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question \"What are the criteria for", "with the theme \"Will my degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think", "are the criteria for degree revocation?\" and close all questions with the theme", "which are not relevant to academia, while making good use of the better", "draft of the requested canonical question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us", "out by editing the wiki and adding information. [Can public political criticism of", "be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think this will reduce the time wasted", "create a question \"What are the criteria for degree revocation?\" and close all", "mater result in my BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create", "editing the wiki and adding information. [Can public political criticism of my alma", "canonical question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by editing the", "revocation?\" and close all questions with the theme \"Will my degree be revoked", "not relevant to academia, while making good use of the better quality answers.", "adding information. [Can public political criticism of my alma mater result in my", "and close all questions with the theme \"Will my degree be revoked if...?\"", "behavior which are not relevant to academia, while making good use of the", "is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by editing the wiki and", "of my alma mater result in my BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness)", "debating individuals views and behavior which are not relevant to academia, while making", "being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question \"What are the", "Please help us out by editing the wiki and adding information. [Can public", "help us out by editing the wiki and adding information. [Can public political", "in my BA being revoked 35 years later?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/revocation-of-a-ba-degree-35-years-later-for-anti-wokeness) Can we create a question", "on debating individuals views and behavior which are not relevant to academia, while", "I think this will reduce the time wasted on debating individuals views and", "criteria for degree revocation?\" and close all questions with the theme \"Will my", "my degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think this will reduce the", "think this will reduce the time wasted on debating individuals views and behavior", "will reduce the time wasted on debating individuals views and behavior which are", "reduce the time wasted on debating individuals views and behavior which are not", "views and behavior which are not relevant to academia, while making good use", "duplicates? I think this will reduce the time wasted on debating individuals views", "degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think this will reduce the time", "question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by editing the wiki", "live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out by editing the wiki and adding information.", "close all questions with the theme \"Will my degree be revoked if...?\" as", "the time wasted on debating individuals views and behavior which are not relevant", "\"What are the criteria for degree revocation?\" and close all questions with the", "and behavior which are not relevant to academia, while making good use of", "\"Will my degree be revoked if...?\" as duplicates? I think this will reduce", "of the requested canonical question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please help us out", "A first draft of the requested canonical question is now live [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153661/what-are-the-criteria-for-degree-revocation/). Please" ]
[ "My fears have been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I probably have", "by the same person as the account that added the thank-you note, since", "answers, though there are comments from the OP account on the question itself.", "that's on my mind is that the OP account might be a throw-away,", "setting directly than through a chain reacting involving my degree. > > >", "I probably have more to fear in my current setting directly than through", "people who answered the question: > > Thank you to everyone for these", "seems to be saying that edit #6 is the addition of a thank-you", "> > > I have posted some thoughts under the first response and", "is that the OP account might be a throw-away, owned by the same", "from either account on any of the answers, though there are comments from", "apparently thanks the people who answered the question: > > Thank you to", "that this is what happened? If so, is that an acceptable thing to", "what happened? If so, is that an acceptable thing to do? One possibility", "Thank you to everyone for these thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears have", "the same person as the account that added the thank-you note, since the", "the first response and will remain engaged in the discussions above. > >", "question (especially as it was originally phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note that", "Am I understanding correctly that this is what happened? If so, is that", "everyone for these thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears have been broadly dispelled,", "are no comments from either account on any of the answers, though there", "fear in my current setting directly than through a chain reacting involving my", "some thoughts under the first response and will remain engaged in the discussions", "of a thank-you note where the question-asker apparently thanks the people who answered", "have posted some thoughts under the first response and will remain engaged in", "question: > > Thank you to everyone for these thoughtful and detailed responses.", "that added the thank-you note, since the question (especially as it was originally", "> > I have posted some thoughts under the first response and will", "account on any of the answers, though there are comments from the OP", "be saying that edit #6 is the addition of a thank-you note where", "mind is that the OP account might be a throw-away, owned by the", "I have posted some thoughts under the first response and will remain engaged", "edit #6 is the addition of a thank-you note where the question-asker apparently", "the question-asker apparently thanks the people who answered the question: > > Thank", "have more to fear in my current setting directly than through a chain", "than the one who originally posted the question. Am I understanding correctly that", "sensitive. Note that there are no comments from either account on any of", "added the thank-you note, since the question (especially as it was originally phrased)", "But this revision seems to be attributed to a different user than the", "more to fear in my current setting directly than through a chain reacting", "response and will remain engaged in the discussions above. > > > But", "who originally posted the question. Am I understanding correctly that this is what", "that edit #6 is the addition of a thank-you note where the question-asker", "on any of the answers, though there are comments from the OP account", "note, since the question (especially as it was originally phrased) is a bit", "the answers, though there are comments from the OP account on the question", "> But this revision seems to be attributed to a different user than", "discussions above. > > > But this revision seems to be attributed to", "where the question-asker apparently thanks the people who answered the question: > >", "an acceptable thing to do? One possibility that's on my mind is that", "the question. Am I understanding correctly that this is what happened? If so,", "some anxienty remains. I probably have more to fear in my current setting", "possibility that's on my mind is that the OP account might be a", "so, is that an acceptable thing to do? One possibility that's on my", "been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I probably have more to fear", "the addition of a thank-you note where the question-asker apparently thanks the people", "current setting directly than through a chain reacting involving my degree. > >", "although some anxienty remains. I probably have more to fear in my current", "to be saying that edit #6 is the addition of a thank-you note", "have been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I probably have more to", "in my current setting directly than through a chain reacting involving my degree.", "thoughts under the first response and will remain engaged in the discussions above.", "anxienty remains. I probably have more to fear in my current setting directly", "than through a chain reacting involving my degree. > > > I have", "thanks the people who answered the question: > > Thank you to everyone", "addition of a thank-you note where the question-asker apparently thanks the people who", "these thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears have been broadly dispelled, although some", "as it was originally phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note that there are", "the question: > > Thank you to everyone for these thoughtful and detailed", "originally posted the question. Am I understanding correctly that this is what happened?", "seems to be attributed to a different user than the one who originally", "is what happened? If so, is that an acceptable thing to do? One", "history](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/153498/revisions) of [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/can-public-political-criticism-of-my-alma-mater-result-in-my-ba-being-revoked-35) seems to be saying that edit #6 is the", "posted the question. Am I understanding correctly that this is what happened? If", "as the account that added the thank-you note, since the question (especially as", "do? One possibility that's on my mind is that the OP account might", "engaged in the discussions above. > > > But this revision seems to", "responses. My fears have been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I probably", "will remain engaged in the discussions above. > > > But this revision", "person as the account that added the thank-you note, since the question (especially", "comments from either account on any of the answers, though there are comments", "a bit sensitive. Note that there are no comments from either account on", "answered the question: > > Thank you to everyone for these thoughtful and", "to everyone for these thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears have been broadly", "dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I probably have more to fear in my", "on my mind is that the OP account might be a throw-away, owned", "the people who answered the question: > > Thank you to everyone for", "fears have been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I probably have more", "thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears have been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty", "> > > But this revision seems to be attributed to a different", "If so, is that an acceptable thing to do? One possibility that's on", "different user than the one who originally posted the question. Am I understanding", "remains. I probably have more to fear in my current setting directly than", "this revision seems to be attributed to a different user than the one", "the thank-you note, since the question (especially as it was originally phrased) is", "question. Am I understanding correctly that this is what happened? If so, is", "reacting involving my degree. > > > I have posted some thoughts under", "Note that there are no comments from either account on any of the", "that the OP account might be a throw-away, owned by the same person", "attributed to a different user than the one who originally posted the question.", "originally phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note that there are no comments from", "any of the answers, though there are comments from the OP account on", "the account that added the thank-you note, since the question (especially as it", "#6 is the addition of a thank-you note where the question-asker apparently thanks", "of the answers, though there are comments from the OP account on the", "that there are no comments from either account on any of the answers,", "my degree. > > > I have posted some thoughts under the first", "either account on any of the answers, though there are comments from the", "I understanding correctly that this is what happened? If so, is that an", "is a bit sensitive. Note that there are no comments from either account", "detailed responses. My fears have been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I", "phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note that there are no comments from either", "throw-away, owned by the same person as the account that added the thank-you", "account that added the thank-you note, since the question (especially as it was", "a chain reacting involving my degree. > > > I have posted some", "remain engaged in the discussions above. > > > But this revision seems", "> > Thank you to everyone for these thoughtful and detailed responses. My", "a thank-you note where the question-asker apparently thanks the people who answered the", "was originally phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note that there are no comments", "[revision history](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/153498/revisions) of [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/can-public-political-criticism-of-my-alma-mater-result-in-my-ba-being-revoked-35) seems to be saying that edit #6 is", "is the addition of a thank-you note where the question-asker apparently thanks the", "degree. > > > I have posted some thoughts under the first response", "> Thank you to everyone for these thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears", "broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains. I probably have more to fear in", "user than the one who originally posted the question. Am I understanding correctly", "you to everyone for these thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears have been", "saying that edit #6 is the addition of a thank-you note where the", "happened? If so, is that an acceptable thing to do? One possibility that's", "who answered the question: > > Thank you to everyone for these thoughtful", "the discussions above. > > > But this revision seems to be attributed", "thank-you note where the question-asker apparently thanks the people who answered the question:", "One possibility that's on my mind is that the OP account might be", "correctly that this is what happened? If so, is that an acceptable thing", "for these thoughtful and detailed responses. My fears have been broadly dispelled, although", "and detailed responses. My fears have been broadly dispelled, although some anxienty remains.", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/can-public-political-criticism-of-my-alma-mater-result-in-my-ba-being-revoked-35) seems to be saying that edit #6 is the addition of", "be attributed to a different user than the one who originally posted the", "> I have posted some thoughts under the first response and will remain", "is that an acceptable thing to do? One possibility that's on my mind", "question-asker apparently thanks the people who answered the question: > > Thank you", "that an acceptable thing to do? One possibility that's on my mind is", "the one who originally posted the question. Am I understanding correctly that this", "thank-you note, since the question (especially as it was originally phrased) is a", "note where the question-asker apparently thanks the people who answered the question: >", "a different user than the one who originally posted the question. Am I", "it was originally phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note that there are no", "(especially as it was originally phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note that there", "to fear in my current setting directly than through a chain reacting involving", "> > But this revision seems to be attributed to a different user", "posted some thoughts under the first response and will remain engaged in the", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/can-public-political-criticism-of-my-alma-mater-result-in-my-ba-being-revoked-35) seems to be saying that edit #6 is the addition of a", "to do? One possibility that's on my mind is that the OP account", "under the first response and will remain engaged in the discussions above. >", "through a chain reacting involving my degree. > > > I have posted", "involving my degree. > > > I have posted some thoughts under the", "The [revision history](https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/153498/revisions) of [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/can-public-political-criticism-of-my-alma-mater-result-in-my-ba-being-revoked-35) seems to be saying that edit #6", "directly than through a chain reacting involving my degree. > > > I", "first response and will remain engaged in the discussions above. > > >", "revision seems to be attributed to a different user than the one who", "to a different user than the one who originally posted the question. Am", "my current setting directly than through a chain reacting involving my degree. >", "one who originally posted the question. Am I understanding correctly that this is", "thing to do? One possibility that's on my mind is that the OP", "OP account might be a throw-away, owned by the same person as the", "same person as the account that added the thank-you note, since the question", "understanding correctly that this is what happened? If so, is that an acceptable", "above. > > > But this revision seems to be attributed to a", "might be a throw-away, owned by the same person as the account that", "acceptable thing to do? One possibility that's on my mind is that the", "since the question (especially as it was originally phrased) is a bit sensitive.", "bit sensitive. Note that there are no comments from either account on any", "there are no comments from either account on any of the answers, though", "and will remain engaged in the discussions above. > > > But this", "the OP account might be a throw-away, owned by the same person as", "be a throw-away, owned by the same person as the account that added", "chain reacting involving my degree. > > > I have posted some thoughts", "account might be a throw-away, owned by the same person as the account", "the question (especially as it was originally phrased) is a bit sensitive. Note", "in the discussions above. > > > But this revision seems to be", "a throw-away, owned by the same person as the account that added the", "my mind is that the OP account might be a throw-away, owned by", "owned by the same person as the account that added the thank-you note,", "no comments from either account on any of the answers, though there are", "this is what happened? If so, is that an acceptable thing to do?", "of [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/153498/can-public-political-criticism-of-my-alma-mater-result-in-my-ba-being-revoked-35) seems to be saying that edit #6 is the addition", "probably have more to fear in my current setting directly than through a", "to be attributed to a different user than the one who originally posted" ]
[ "questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to leave behind the outdated medical", "studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the", "the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused by society when it", "appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not exist", "problem that belongs to the individual. In my area of work—digital accessibility—and in", "it does not give equivalent attention and accommodation to the needs of individuals", "[Does FERPA require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions", "'disability'\") even though they were submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA", "to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show", "does not seek to change the person either. According to the social model,", "and an environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People with", "outdated medical model of disability. (I do not wish to imply that Academia", "so it doesn't look like this was a direct consequence of [What to", "assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect solution.", "behind the outdated medical model of disability. (I do not wish to imply", "([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of the interaction between people living with impairments", "treats disability as (1) primarily a medical issue and (2) a problem that", "not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral Defense for Hearing", "behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) * [How should I apply for readmission to a", "2015. Both the tag synonymisation and some of the proposals in the June", "of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the [medical model", "outdated and has been replaced with the [social model of disability*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does", "an environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People with Disability", "additional disability theory.) What I am asking by requesting to undo the synonymisation", "There are a number of questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions", "mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation and some of the", "in the June 2015 question appear to be based on a model of", "even though they were submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require", "with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of synonyms for", "to the individual. In my area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this", "[health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): [How", "tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation and some of the proposals", "should I apply for readmission to a graduate program from which I had", "for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations", "to be exhaustive. There are a number of questions that are still tagged", "harder to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions", "that we can handle this tagging question without additional disability theory.) What I", "tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term", "* [Does the Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations for students whose disability", "disability requires a \"cure\" or, if that is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural", "of disability that treats disability as (1) primarily a medical issue and (2)", "only models of disability, but I hope that we can handle this tagging", "[Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended to be", "and social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created problem", "tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans With Disabilities Act require", "on a model of disability that treats disability as (1) primarily a medical", "in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based", "consequence of [What to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both", "a matter of the full integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The", "* [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended to", "'disability'\"): * [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools", "impairments and an environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People", "of disability*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the impact of the impairment but does", "visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) [Does the Americans With Disabilities Act", "\"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based", "with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created problem and a matter of", "questions such as [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools", "medical model of disability. (I do not wish to imply that Academia SE", "with impairments and an environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\"", "latter is a term used by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be", "this synonym was created on 22 June 2019, so it doesn't look like", "June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising", "well for questions such as [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching", "e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show", "questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term used by the [CDC in", "primarily a medical issue and (2) a problem that belongs to the individual.", "'disability'\")** is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full", "was a direct consequence of [What to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from", "it might be harder to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On second thought,", "of the full integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and", "problem and a matter of the full integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled", "synonymisation and some of the proposals in the June 2015 question appear to", "\"cure\". This model is now outdated and has been replaced with the [*social", "do not wish to imply that Academia SE defends or promotes the medical", "questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well for questions such as [How", "\"a socially created problem and a matter of the full integration of individuals", "a term used by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better", "questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they", "would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag", "deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the", "to be implicit in these tag synonyms.) This would mean that, for example,", "created on 22 June 2019, so it doesn't look like this was a", "does not exist on this site and creating it might be harder to", "living with impairments and an environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and social", "from which I had to withdraw due to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311)", "above question would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but", "of questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though", "on this site and creating it might be harder to achieve here. ---", "accommodation to the needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result", "and accommodation to the needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the", "[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311)", "issue and (2) a problem that belongs to the individual. In my area", "second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\")", "to the needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of", "model of disability*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the impact of the impairment but", "assistant post-Master's and not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) [Oral", "for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and [Oral Defense", "creating it might be harder to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On second", "and a matter of the full integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)).", "and some of the proposals in the June 2015 question appear to be", "[How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired", "now outdated and has been replaced with the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which", "be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely", "direct consequence of [What to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015.", "It would definitely work well for questions such as [How do conferences work", "them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) * [How should I apply for readmission", "'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list", "--- Update 05.09.2020: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion", "the proposals in the June 2015 question appear to be based on a", "'disability'\") is not a perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some of the above question", "give equivalent attention and accommodation to the needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)),", "definitely work well for questions such as [How do conferences work for deaf", "more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not", "was created on 22 June 2019, so it doesn't look like this was", "tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to", "tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do conferences work", "of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a", "social models are by no means the two only models of disability, but", "[health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to leave behind the", "some of the above question would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions", "the impact of the impairment but does not seek to change the person", "apply for readmission to a graduate program from which I had to withdraw", "for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does", "Both the tag synonymisation and some of the proposals in the June 2015", "and not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral Defense for", "and creating it might be harder to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On", "\"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do", "between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is", "the interaction between people living with impairments and an environment filled with physical,", "perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some of the above question would be more appropriately", "requires a \"cure\" or, if that is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change", "FERPA require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged", "(probably) [Trying to volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's and not having any", "my area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the", "theory.) What I am asking by requesting to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability", "\"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to leave behind the outdated", "'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term used", "notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not", "2015 question appear to be based on a model of disability that treats", "but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do conferences work for deaf", "tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on 22 June 2019, so it doesn't", "does not deny the impact of the impairment but does not seek to", "medical issue and (2) a problem that belongs to the individual. In my", "(1) primarily a medical issue and (2) a problem that belongs to the", "require accommodations for students whose disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed)", "are a number of questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged", "tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they were submitted after 22", "disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect", "On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged", "doesn't look like this was a direct consequence of [What to do with", "(The medical and the social models are by no means the two only", "[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for", "as a surrogate \"cure\". This model is now outdated and has been replaced", "is now outdated and has been replaced with the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability),", "June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation and some of the proposals in the", ".) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect solution. Strictly", "impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations for students", "a perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some of the above question would be more", "and the social models are by no means the two only models of", "that is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in the individual as a", "Strictly speaking, some of the above question would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility", "society when it does not give equivalent attention and accommodation to the needs", "behavioural change in the individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This model is now", "if that is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in the individual as", "* [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools for", "to be based on a model of disability that treats disability as (1)", "they were submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification", "disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the impact of the impairment but does not", "volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's and not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311)", "but I hope that we can handle this tagging question without additional disability", "impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of the interaction between people living with", "[disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the [medical model of disability*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on", "can handle this tagging question without additional disability theory.) What I am asking", "deny the impact of the impairment but does not seek to change the", "tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well for questions such as [How do", "is seems to be implicit in these tag synonyms.) This would mean that,", "According to the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused by society", "scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and [Oral Defense for Hearing", "defends or promotes the medical model, only that is seems to be implicit", "be exhaustive. There are a number of questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability", "but that tag does not exist on this site and creating it might", "'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not exist on this site and creating it", "physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a", "students whose disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) [How should", "Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created problem and a matter of the full", "medical and the social models are by no means the two only models", "'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to leave", "\"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) ", "adjustment or behavioural change in the individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This model", "are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they were submitted", "the two only models of disability, but I hope that we can handle", "of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model, disability requires a \"cure\" or, if", "to change the person either. According to the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to", "be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"):", "a problem that belongs to the individual. In my area of work—digital accessibility—and", "[What to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the tag", "synonyms.) This would mean that, for example, the following questions would no longer", "22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .)", "'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): [How do conferences work for", "22 June 2019, so it doesn't look like this was a direct consequence", "to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation", "\"cure\" or, if that is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in the", "the needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of the", "[Does the Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations for students whose disability prevents", "proposals in the June 2015 question appear to be based on a model", "after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311)", "and has been replaced with the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not", "not intended to be exhaustive. There are a number of questions that are", "not exist on this site and creating it might be harder to achieve", "might be harder to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion", "\"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some of", "with physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to", "either. According to the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused by", "and (2) a problem that belongs to the individual. In my area of", "I am asking by requesting to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions", "the restrictions caused by society when it does not give equivalent attention and", "'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to leave behind the outdated medical model of", "would definitely work well for questions such as [How do conferences work for", "submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification of disability", "work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and [Oral", "only that is seems to be implicit in these tag synonyms.) This would", "questions tagged 'disability'\")** is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see", "but does not seek to change the person either. According to the social", "scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans", "do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311)", "do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation and", "by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying to volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's", "wish to imply that Academia SE defends or promotes the medical model, only", "than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well for questions", "research assistant post-Master's and not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) ", "a number of questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\")", "not give equivalent attention and accommodation to the needs of individuals with impairments\"", "\"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is", "questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not exist on this site and", "the Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations for students whose disability prevents them", "to \" the result of the interaction between people living with impairments and", "the June 2015 question appear to be based on a model of disability", "medical model, only that is seems to be implicit in these tag synonyms.)", "were submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification of", "be harder to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show", "to the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused by society when", "disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model, disability requires a \"cure\" or, if that", "change the person either. According to the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the", "the following questions would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\")", "synonym was created on 22 June 2019, so it doesn't look like this", "means the two only models of disability, but I hope that we can", "to \"a socially created problem and a matter of the full integration of", "having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired", "tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not exist on this site and creating", "[How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools for visually", "\"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused by society when it does not give", "filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or", "accommodations for students whose disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) ", "visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311).", "or promotes the medical model, only that is seems to be implicit in", "is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in the individual as a surrogate", "\" the result of the interaction between people living with impairments and an", "model of disability that treats disability as (1) primarily a medical issue and", "a graduate program from which I had to withdraw due to misconduct caused", "for Academia SE to leave behind the outdated medical model of disability. (I", "deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and [Oral Defense for", "intended to be exhaustive. There are a number of questions that are still", "SE to leave behind the outdated medical model of disability. (I do not", " [How should I apply for readmission to a graduate program from which", "had to withdraw due to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying", "tag does not exist on this site and creating it might be harder", "communication and social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created", "be based on a model of disability that treats disability as (1) primarily", "of [What to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the", "society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social models are by no means", "questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a", "prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) * [How should I apply for", "to a graduate program from which I had to withdraw due to misconduct", "as a research assistant post-Master's and not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently", "\"show questions tagged 'disability'\")** is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\")", "equivalent attention and accommodation to the needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to", "requesting to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues", "[Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans With Disabilities", "Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations for students whose disability prevents them from", "ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) * [How should I apply for readmission to a graduate", "the outdated medical model of disability. (I do not wish to imply that", "from June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation and some of the proposals in", "question appear to be based on a model of disability that treats disability", "tagging question without additional disability theory.) What I am asking by requesting to", "look like this was a direct consequence of [What to do with the", "05.09.2020*: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions", "[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they were submitted after 22 June", "models of disability, but I hope that we can handle this tagging question", "[Trying to volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's and not having any success", "full integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social", "misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) (probably) [Trying to volunteer as a research", "questions tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching", "may be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would", "a direct consequence of [What to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June", "to imply that Academia SE defends or promotes the medical model, only that", "that treats disability as (1) primarily a medical issue and (2) a problem", "site and creating it might be harder to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020:", "such as [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for", "I had to withdraw due to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably)", "term used by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag", "This would mean that, for example, the following questions would no longer be", "created problem and a matter of the full integration of individuals into society\"", "in these tag synonyms.) This would mean that, for example, the following questions", "restrictions caused by society when it does not give equivalent attention and accommodation", "tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): ", "[disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term used by the", "integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social models", "[full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms),", "the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the impact of the", "not wish to imply that Academia SE defends or promotes the medical model,", "disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) [How should I apply", "the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model, disability requires a", "success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This", "model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model, disability requires a \"cure\" or,", "without additional disability theory.) What I am asking by requesting to undo the", "be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does", "This model is now outdated and has been replaced with the [social model", "2019, so it doesn't look like this was a direct consequence of [What", "question without additional disability theory.) What I am asking by requesting to undo", "with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation and some", "work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) ", "which does not deny the impact of the impairment but does not seek", "appear to be based on a model of disability that treats disability as", "\"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term used by the [CDC", "undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions", "from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) [How should I apply for readmission to", "disability, but I hope that we can handle this tagging question without additional", "two only models of disability, but I hope that we can handle this", "In my area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as", "model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused by society when it does not", "is a term used by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a", "replaced with the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the impact", "tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the", "people living with impairments and an environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and", "due to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying to volunteer as", "the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on 22 June 2019,", "and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to leave behind", "Act require accommodations for students whose disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently", "'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well for questions such as [How do conferences", "to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying to volunteer as a", "closed) * [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended", "Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created problem and a matter of the", "(This list is not intended to be exhaustive. There are a number of", "the impairment but does not seek to change the person either. According to", "do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired", "Update 05.09.2020: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show", "would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show", "as (1) primarily a medical issue and (2) a problem that belongs to", "`health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on", "June 2015 question appear to be based on a model of disability that", "the medical model, disability requires a \"cure\" or, if that is not feasible,", "achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\")", "SE defends or promotes the medical model, only that is seems to be", "so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list", "questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on", "a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying to volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's and", "mean that, for example, the following questions would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues", "currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of", "[medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model, disability requires a \"cure\"", "socially created problem and a matter of the full integration of individuals into", "of disability. (I do not wish to imply that Academia SE defends or", "when it does not give equivalent attention and accommodation to the needs of", "tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE to leave behind the outdated medical model", "visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations for", "model, only that is seems to be implicit in these tag synonyms.) This", "of the impairment but does not seek to change the person either. According", "surrogate \"cure\". This model is now outdated and has been replaced with the", "a model of disability that treats disability as (1) primarily a medical issue", "The tag [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show", "work well for questions such as [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311),", "a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work", "June 2019, so it doesn't look like this was a direct consequence of", "Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect solution. Strictly speaking,", "tag synonyms.) This would mean that, for example, the following questions would no", "of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on 22 June 2019, so it", "in the individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This model is now outdated and", "am asking by requesting to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged", "disability theory.) What I am asking by requesting to undo the synonymisation between", "here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or", "the social models are by no means the two only models of disability,", "still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they were submitted after", "is not a perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some of the above question would", "the [full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of tag", "social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused by society when it does", "that tag does not exist on this site and creating it might be", "[list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on 22 June 2019, so", "this is known as the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical", "questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they were submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g.", "barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created problem and a", "known as the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model, disability", "some of the proposals in the June 2015 question appear to be based", "([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social models are by no means the", "the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311) from June 2015. Both the tag synonymisation and some of", "withdraw due to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying to volunteer", "by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility", "on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on 22 June", "the result of the interaction between people living with impairments and an environment", "tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some of the above", "question would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that", "leave behind the outdated medical model of disability. (I do not wish to", "medical model, disability requires a \"cure\" or, if that is not feasible, adjustment", "synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\")", "disability as (1) primarily a medical issue and (2) a problem that belongs", "no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions", "between people living with impairments and an environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication", "environment filled with physical, attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/))", "it doesn't look like this was a direct consequence of [What to do", "in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged", "(the latter is a term used by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may", "models are by no means the two only models of disability, but I", "the medical model, only that is seems to be implicit in these tag", "feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in the individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This", "synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was", "a \"cure\" or, if that is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in", "the tag synonymisation and some of the proposals in the June 2015 question", "of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social models are", "Disabilities Act require accommodations for students whose disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311)", "questions would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability", "synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of synonyms", "would mean that, for example, the following questions would no longer be tagged", "What I am asking by requesting to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show", "'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term used by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html))", "belongs to the individual. In my area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies)", "tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term used by the [CDC in the", "tagged 'disability'\")** is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the", "to leave behind the outdated medical model of disability. (I do not wish", "Academia SE defends or promotes the medical model, only that is seems to", "that, for example, the following questions would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show", "used by the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag than", "of the proposals in the June 2015 question appear to be based on", "program from which I had to withdraw due to misconduct caused by a", "imply that Academia SE defends or promotes the medical model, only that is", "a medical issue and (2) a problem that belongs to the individual. In", "Based on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on 22", "result of the interaction between people living with impairments and an environment filled", "Based on the medical model, disability requires a \"cure\" or, if that is", "that Academia SE defends or promotes the medical model, only that is seems", "change in the individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This model is now outdated", "number of questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even", "for readmission to a graduate program from which I had to withdraw due", "the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged", "like this was a direct consequence of [What to do with the mental-health", "parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is", "[Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired", "we can handle this tagging question without additional disability theory.) What I am", "individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of the interaction between people", "list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this", "is for Academia SE to leave behind the outdated medical model of disability.", "refers \"to the restrictions caused by society when it does not give equivalent", "Academia SE to leave behind the outdated medical model of disability. (I do", "I apply for readmission to a graduate program from which I had to", "(currently closed) * [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not", "needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of the interaction", "[social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the impact of the impairment", "\"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they were submitted after 22 June 2019,", "(currently closed) * [How should I apply for readmission to a graduate program", "not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in the individual as a surrogate \"cure\".", "with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of the interaction between people living", "that is seems to be implicit in these tag synonyms.) This would mean", "individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social models are by", "person either. According to the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions caused", "questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do conferences", "closed) * [How should I apply for readmission to a graduate program from", "attitudinal, communication and social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially", "of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym", "the [CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show", "(I do not wish to imply that Academia SE defends or promotes the", "better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well", "tag [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions", "With Disabilities Act require accommodations for students whose disability prevents them from behaving", "[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some", "Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended to be exhaustive. There are", "the individual. In my area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is", "conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311)", "or to \"a socially created problem and a matter of the full integration", "seek to change the person either. According to the social model, \"disability\" refers", "model, disability requires a \"cure\" or, if that is not feasible, adjustment or", "does not give equivalent attention and accommodation to the needs of individuals with", "[How should I apply for readmission to a graduate program from which I", "promotes the medical model, only that is seems to be implicit in these", "2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability", "Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended to be exhaustive. There are a number", "area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the [*medical", "tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well for", "by society when it does not give equivalent attention and accommodation to the", "not a perfect* solution. Strictly speaking, some of the above question would be", "post-Master's and not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral Defense", "model is now outdated and has been replaced with the [social model of", "longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged", "[accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well for questions such", "accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability).", "impact of the impairment but does not seek to change the person either.", "questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia SE", "this was a direct consequence of [What to do with the mental-health tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/1783/62311)", "of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \" the result of the interaction between", "seems to be implicit in these tag synonyms.) This would mean that, for", "for questions such as [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual", "been replaced with the [social model of disability*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the", "exhaustive. There are a number of questions that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show", "individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This model is now outdated and has been", "Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended to be exhaustive.", "World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social models are by no means the two", "for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended to be exhaustive. There", "or behavioural change in the individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This model is", " (probably) [Trying to volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's and not having", "the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\").", "has been replaced with the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny", "list is not intended to be exhaustive. There are a number of questions", "impairment but does not seek to change the person either. According to the", "of disability, but I hope that we can handle this tagging question without", "by no means the two only models of disability, but I hope that", "on 22 June 2019, so it doesn't look like this was a direct", "example, the following questions would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged", "social barriers\" ([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created problem and", "matter of the full integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical", "graduate program from which I had to withdraw due to misconduct caused by", "[disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged", "not deny the impact of the impairment but does not seek to change", "students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans With Disabilities Act require accommodations for students whose", "is currently synonymised with [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list", "individual. In my area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known", "not seek to change the person either. According to the social model, \"disability\"", "no means the two only models of disability, but I hope that we", "any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311)", "is not intended to be exhaustive. There are a number of questions that", "the person either. According to the social model, \"disability\" refers \"to the restrictions", "tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not exist on", "thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the", "whose disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) * [How should I", "[inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged 'inclusion'\") or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter", "though they were submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does FERPA require parental", "([People with Disability Australia](https://pwd.org.au/resources/disability-info/social-model-of-disability/)) or to \"a socially created problem and a matter", "tag synonymisation and some of the proposals in the June 2015 question appear", "\"to the restrictions caused by society when it does not give equivalent attention", "conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) and", "which I had to withdraw due to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) ", "interaction between people living with impairments and an environment filled with physical, attitudinal,", "work—digital accessibility—and in [disability studies](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disability_studies) this is known as the [medical model of", "the full integration of individuals into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the", "\"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") is for Academia", "to withdraw due to misconduct caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) (probably) [Trying to", "of the above question would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged", "as the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model, disability requires", "[accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not exist on this", "USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It", "solution. Strictly speaking, some of the above question would be more appropriately tagged", "require parental notification of disability assessment?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/135519/62311) .) Desynonymising [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\")", "based on a model of disability that treats disability as (1) primarily a", "the individual as a surrogate \"cure\". This model is now outdated and has", "questions tagged 'disability'\") is not a perfect solution. Strictly speaking, some of the", "\"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"), but that tag does not exist on this site", "as [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311), [Teaching visual tools for visually", "a research assistant post-Master's and not having any success so far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed)", "that are still tagged [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") even though they were", "this tagging question without additional disability theory.) What I am asking by requesting", "for example, the following questions would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions", "caused by society when it does not give equivalent attention and accommodation to", "the above question would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"),", "be implicit in these tag synonyms.) This would mean that, for example, the", "into society\" ([Disabled World](https://www.disabled-world.com/definitions/disability-models.php)). (The medical and the social models are by no", "hope that we can handle this tagging question without additional disability theory.) What", "asking by requesting to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\")", "exist on this site and creating it might be harder to achieve here.", "* [Teaching visual tools for visually impaired students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153531/62311) * [Does the Americans With", "a surrogate \"cure\". This model is now outdated and has been replaced with", "with the [social model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability), which does not deny the impact of", "[CDC in the USA](https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/disability-inclusion.html)) may be a better tag than [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show questions", "is known as the [medical model of disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_model_of_disability). Based on the medical model,", "to achieve here. --- Update 05.09.2020: On second thought, [inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusion \"show questions tagged", "by requesting to undo the synonymisation between [disability](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability \"show questions tagged 'disability'\") and", "disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying to volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's and not", "readmission to a graduate program from which I had to withdraw due to", "far](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/150007/62311) (currently closed) * [Oral Defense for Hearing Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is", "following questions would no longer be tagged [health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") but", "or [disability-inclusion](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/disability-inclusion \"show questions tagged 'disability-inclusion'\") (the latter is a term used by", "Impaired Student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/145404/62311) (This list is not intended to be exhaustive. There are a", "or, if that is not feasible, adjustment or behavioural change in the individual", "on the medical model, disability requires a \"cure\" or, if that is not", "disability that treats disability as (1) primarily a medical issue and (2) a", "[health-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/health-issues \"show questions tagged 'health-issues'\") (see the [full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)).", "handle this tagging question without additional disability theory.) What I am asking by", "implicit in these tag synonyms.) This would mean that, for example, the following", "of the interaction between people living with impairments and an environment filled with", "(see the [full list of synonyms for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of", "disability. (I do not wish to imply that Academia SE defends or promotes", "caused by a disability?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/152114/62311) * (probably) [Trying to volunteer as a research assistant", "\"show questions tagged 'accessibility'\"). It would definitely work well for questions such as", "synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created on 22 June 2019, so it doesn't look", "I hope that we can handle this tagging question without additional disability theory.)", "attention and accommodation to the needs of individuals with impairments\" ([Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_model_of_disability)), to \"", "these tag synonyms.) This would mean that, for example, the following questions would", "that belongs to the individual. In my area of work—digital accessibility—and in [disability", "tagged 'disability'\") even though they were submitted after 22 June 2019, e.g. [Does", "for students whose disability prevents them from behaving ethically?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/153447/62311) (currently closed) * [How", "speaking, some of the above question would be more appropriately tagged [accessibility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/accessibility \"show", "tagged 'disability'\"): * [How do conferences work for deaf scientists?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/154710/62311) * [Teaching visual", "(2) a problem that belongs to the individual. In my area of work—digital", "model of disability. (I do not wish to imply that Academia SE defends", "for `health-issues`](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/health-issues/synonyms)). Based on the [list of tag synonyms](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms), this synonym was created", "this site and creating it might be harder to achieve here. --- **Update", "to volunteer as a research assistant post-Master's and not having any success so", "are by no means the two only models of disability, but I hope" ]