Split (1)

train · 10.4M rows

ngram listlengths 0 10.5k
[ "and could be applied to various situations. However, I've been prohibited from posting", "a falling-out with a professor last year, and the situation has been quite", "Stack Exchange. It was a complex issue; thus, it's not something that can", "deal with the situation in real life, but so far I haven't gotten", "I was posting about it on Academia Stack Exchange. It was a complex", "situation in real life, but so far I haven't gotten answers, so I", "and I don't feel one can be prohibited from posting about a topic", "in real life, but so far I haven't gotten answers, so I was", "However, I've been prohibited from posting anything related to it, and I don't", "to deal with the situation in real life, but so far I haven't", "issue is directly related to academia.) Yes, I post about this a lot,", "to it, and I don't feel one can be prohibited from posting about", "I've been prohibited from posting anything related to it, and I don't feel", "year, and the situation has been quite distressing for me. I'm trying to", "the matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions; each had a distinct topic and", "situations. However, I've been prohibited from posting anything related to it, and I", "about it on Academia Stack Exchange. It was a complex issue; thus, it's", "to various situations. However, I've been prohibited from posting anything related to it,", "a distinct topic and could be applied to various situations. However, I've been", "don't feel one can be prohibited from posting about a topic unless that", "unless that topic is offensive and/or unrelated to the stack exchange. (My issue", "that topic is offensive and/or unrelated to the stack exchange. (My issue is", "from posting about a topic unless that topic is offensive and/or unrelated to", "and/or unrelated to the stack exchange. (My issue is directly related to academia.)", "haven't broken any stack exchange rule, so I wanted to complain about this.", "fully addressed in one post. As such, I've posted various questions relating to", "thus, it's not something that can be fully addressed in one post. As", "Academia Stack Exchange. It was a complex issue; thus, it's not something that", "to academia.) Yes, I post about this a lot, but I haven't broken", "so far I haven't gotten answers, so I was posting about it on", "a topic unless that topic is offensive and/or unrelated to the stack exchange.", "feel one can be prohibited from posting about a topic unless that topic", "the stack exchange. (My issue is directly related to academia.) Yes, I post", "falling-out with a professor last year, and the situation has been quite distressing", "it on Academia Stack Exchange. It was a complex issue; thus, it's not", "directly related to academia.) Yes, I post about this a lot, but I", "offensive and/or unrelated to the stack exchange. (My issue is directly related to", "last year, and the situation has been quite distressing for me. I'm trying", "a complex issue; thus, it's not something that can be fully addressed in", "complex issue; thus, it's not something that can be fully addressed in one", "various situations. However, I've been prohibited from posting anything related to it, and", "far I haven't gotten answers, so I was posting about it on Academia", "be prohibited from posting about a topic unless that topic is offensive and/or", "could be applied to various situations. However, I've been prohibited from posting anything", "Yes, I post about this a lot, but I haven't broken any stack", "can be fully addressed in one post. As such, I've posted various questions", "questions relating to the matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions; each had a", "related to it, and I don't feel one can be prohibited from posting", "relating to the matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions; each had a distinct", "each had a distinct topic and could be applied to various situations. However,", "anything related to it, and I don't feel one can be prohibited from", "a lot, but I haven't broken any stack exchange rule, so I wanted", "I'm trying to deal with the situation in real life, but so far", "I haven't gotten answers, so I was posting about it on Academia Stack", "answers, so I was posting about it on Academia Stack Exchange. It was", "situation has been quite distressing for me. I'm trying to deal with the", "from posting anything related to it, and I don't feel one can be", "prohibited from posting about a topic unless that topic is offensive and/or unrelated", "about this a lot, but I haven't broken any stack exchange rule, so", "topic unless that topic is offensive and/or unrelated to the stack exchange. (My", "It was a complex issue; thus, it's not something that can be fully", "distressing for me. I'm trying to deal with the situation in real life,", "addressed in one post. As such, I've posted various questions relating to the", "for me. I'm trying to deal with the situation in real life, but", "academia.) Yes, I post about this a lot, but I haven't broken any", "can be prohibited from posting about a topic unless that topic is offensive", "various questions relating to the matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions; each had", "applied to various situations. However, I've been prohibited from posting anything related to", "that can be fully addressed in one post. As such, I've posted various", "As such, I've posted various questions relating to the matter; however, they weren't", "to the matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions; each had a distinct topic", "this a lot, but I haven't broken any stack exchange rule, so I", "real life, but so far I haven't gotten answers, so I was posting", "I had a falling-out with a professor last year, and the situation has", "life, but so far I haven't gotten answers, so I was posting about", "prohibited from posting anything related to it, and I don't feel one can", "it, and I don't feel one can be prohibited from posting about a", "but so far I haven't gotten answers, so I was posting about it", "however, they weren't duplicate questions; each had a distinct topic and could be", "was a complex issue; thus, it's not something that can be fully addressed", "lot, but I haven't broken any stack exchange rule, so I wanted to", "related to academia.) Yes, I post about this a lot, but I haven't", "be applied to various situations. However, I've been prohibited from posting anything related", "weren't duplicate questions; each had a distinct topic and could be applied to", "unrelated to the stack exchange. (My issue is directly related to academia.) Yes,", "is offensive and/or unrelated to the stack exchange. (My issue is directly related", "posting anything related to it, and I don't feel one can be prohibited", "I don't feel one can be prohibited from posting about a topic unless", "Exchange. It was a complex issue; thus, it's not something that can be", "quite distressing for me. I'm trying to deal with the situation in real", "it's not something that can be fully addressed in one post. As such,", "and the situation has been quite distressing for me. I'm trying to deal", "I post about this a lot, but I haven't broken any stack exchange", "so I was posting about it on Academia Stack Exchange. It was a", "had a falling-out with a professor last year, and the situation has been", "been prohibited from posting anything related to it, and I don't feel one", "something that can be fully addressed in one post. As such, I've posted", "been quite distressing for me. I'm trying to deal with the situation in", "I haven't broken any stack exchange rule, so I wanted to complain about", "be fully addressed in one post. As such, I've posted various questions relating", "I've posted various questions relating to the matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions;", "haven't gotten answers, so I was posting about it on Academia Stack Exchange.", "about a topic unless that topic is offensive and/or unrelated to the stack", "not something that can be fully addressed in one post. As such, I've", "they weren't duplicate questions; each had a distinct topic and could be applied", "issue; thus, it's not something that can be fully addressed in one post.", "stack exchange. (My issue is directly related to academia.) Yes, I post about", "posted various questions relating to the matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions; each", "me. I'm trying to deal with the situation in real life, but so", "a professor last year, and the situation has been quite distressing for me.", "topic is offensive and/or unrelated to the stack exchange. (My issue is directly", "the situation has been quite distressing for me. I'm trying to deal with", "one post. As such, I've posted various questions relating to the matter; however,", "post. As such, I've posted various questions relating to the matter; however, they", "was posting about it on Academia Stack Exchange. It was a complex issue;", "duplicate questions; each had a distinct topic and could be applied to various", "has been quite distressing for me. I'm trying to deal with the situation", "with the situation in real life, but so far I haven't gotten answers,", "gotten answers, so I was posting about it on Academia Stack Exchange. It", "matter; however, they weren't duplicate questions; each had a distinct topic and could", "professor last year, and the situation has been quite distressing for me. I'm", "questions; each had a distinct topic and could be applied to various situations.", "posting about a topic unless that topic is offensive and/or unrelated to the", "in one post. As such, I've posted various questions relating to the matter;", "exchange. (My issue is directly related to academia.) Yes, I post about this", "but I haven't broken any stack exchange rule, so I wanted to complain", "posting about it on Academia Stack Exchange. It was a complex issue; thus,", "trying to deal with the situation in real life, but so far I", "the situation in real life, but so far I haven't gotten answers, so", "with a professor last year, and the situation has been quite distressing for", "on Academia Stack Exchange. It was a complex issue; thus, it's not something", "such, I've posted various questions relating to the matter; however, they weren't duplicate", "one can be prohibited from posting about a topic unless that topic is", "distinct topic and could be applied to various situations. However, I've been prohibited", "had a distinct topic and could be applied to various situations. However, I've", "is directly related to academia.) Yes, I post about this a lot, but", "topic and could be applied to various situations. However, I've been prohibited from", "(My issue is directly related to academia.) Yes, I post about this a", "to the stack exchange. (My issue is directly related to academia.) Yes, I", "post about this a lot, but I haven't broken any stack exchange rule," ]
[ "anything wrong in asking about an educated guess about the possible future impact", "educated guess about the possible future impact factor of a new journal? [What", "journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed to fill that the other APS journals", "wrong with this question? In particular, is there anything wrong in asking about", "possible future impact factor of a new journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed", "niche is PRResearch supposed to fill that the other APS journals don’t already", "asking about an educated guess about the possible future impact factor of a", "is PRResearch supposed to fill that the other APS journals don’t already cover?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155352/what-niche-is-prresearch-supposed-to-fill-that-the-other-aps-journals-don-t-alre)", "a new journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed to fill that the other", "[What niche is PRResearch supposed to fill that the other APS journals don’t", "there anything wrong in asking about an educated guess about the possible future", "factor of a new journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed to fill that", "In particular, is there anything wrong in asking about an educated guess about", "the possible future impact factor of a new journal? [What niche is PRResearch", "in asking about an educated guess about the possible future impact factor of", "an educated guess about the possible future impact factor of a new journal?", "there anything wrong with this question? In particular, is there anything wrong in", "impact factor of a new journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed to fill", "anything wrong with this question? In particular, is there anything wrong in asking", "about the possible future impact factor of a new journal? [What niche is", "this question? In particular, is there anything wrong in asking about an educated", "particular, is there anything wrong in asking about an educated guess about the", "with this question? In particular, is there anything wrong in asking about an", "new journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed to fill that the other APS", "question? In particular, is there anything wrong in asking about an educated guess", "is there anything wrong in asking about an educated guess about the possible", "about an educated guess about the possible future impact factor of a new", "of a new journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed to fill that the", "Is there anything wrong with this question? In particular, is there anything wrong", "wrong in asking about an educated guess about the possible future impact factor", "guess about the possible future impact factor of a new journal? [What niche", "future impact factor of a new journal? [What niche is PRResearch supposed to" ]
[ "lower caste, or want to look down on lower castes in India. >", "enable you to take some kind of action?\" I did > not say", "> > In the end, I remarked to this individual that one serious", "bit, but good old days, and we'll meet again! But again, this >", "I did > not say 'white people in the university were an abominable", "The context was that this > university made headlines by adding caste as", "over the rest of the posts, and I'm not sure what to make", "that automatically creates a lot of problems. > > > I had to", "be though. So what does the rest of the community think? Am I", "doubt, so I gave sincere advice. Then I read this reply by the", "as a casteist a\\\\hole and that too by calling > white Americans in", "too by calling > white Americans in my university lower castes by default,", "Diap * HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that this person landed", "advice. Then I read this reply by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that", "* HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that this person landed at", "view white people in my university as a lower caste, or want to", "at least a few generations, and > have faced the wrath of some", "> pretty much over, after their continuing dismissals of all incidents. > >", "the OP are quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves the benefit of the", "> or the chat probably covers at most 30% of everything documented >", "become so focused on this person's bizarre situation that I can't imagine it", "exactly what I had written in the very last email to the >", "Then I read this reply by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was", "> and see a dimwitted peasant class that is a natural anathema for", "caste then of > course. In fact literally four of my most closest", "in my university as an abominable low caste, and that automatically creates a", "all of Massachusetts. But in light of the quote above, it seems more", "bit sick myself talking in this manner with these disgusting > hypocrites who", "clearer; I was basically trolling, and trying to conjure > up an image", "was more swayed by the opinion of General category folk around me), I", "most 30% of everything documented > there. > > > OP later clarified:", "the same OP: > > I wrote this after documenting a huge number", "IX office saying there's > nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not sure if", "reaction; if they would do anything now that I claimed that the >", "I mean, caste should be a protected class, but very very > few", "I can't imagine it being particularly useful to other readers. I'm not sure", "being particularly useful to other readers. I'm not sure what the appropriate action", "calling > white Americans in my university lower castes by default, in a", "though. So what does the rest of the community think? Am I being", "lot of these problems stem from the fact > that I'm a high", "I wrote this after documenting a huge number of incidents inside our >", "that I had was huge, and this thread > or the chat probably", "the benefit of the doubt, so I gave sincere advice. Then I read", "email to the > Title IX office: \"Actually a lot of these problems", "post regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP are", "documented > incidents could be dealt with by the Title IX office, but", "university > and see a dimwitted peasant class that is a natural anathema", "but I felt the > time for continuing politeness with our university administration", "could be dealt with by the Title IX office, but certainly > there", "class, and > thus showed off it's progressive cred.I should mention that in", "and > have faced the wrath of some of my friends for saying", "wrong. Actually I'm not sure if all of the documented > incidents could", "> even further. I mean, caste should be a protected class, but very", "a minimum the conversation has become so focused on this person's bizarre situation", "> I had to re-read it to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then", "after reading the above comment? Some more context from the linked chat room", "was that this > university made headlines by adding caste as a protected", "I claimed that the > whole problem was basically casteist. This was meant", "as a lower caste, or want to look down on lower castes in", "few places in the US have added caste as a protected class, if", "was meant to slander them > even further. I mean, caste should be", "> > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly what I had written", "slander them > even further. I mean, caste should be a protected class,", "racism, including physical confrontations and swearing: * Other PhD students * The department", "> Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly what I had written in", "more likely, the whole post is an elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling.", "privileged caste. I've lost touch a > little bit, but good old days,", "at best, but I felt the > time for continuing politeness with our", "got a reply from the Title IX office saying there's > nothing really", "at the most racist institution in all of Massachusetts. But in light of", "a huge number of incidents inside our > department, and got a reply", "have the highest voted answer to [this controversial post regarding racism against an", "in the university were an abominable lower > caste'. The idea was to", "I > was more swayed by the opinion of General category folk around", "if they would do anything now that I claimed that the > whole", "wrote this after documenting a huge number of incidents inside our > department,", "the most racist institution in all of Massachusetts. But in light of the", "I remarked to this individual that one serious problem is that I'm a", "this university. I > felt a bit sick myself talking in this manner", "an abominable lower > caste'. The idea was to bark back. The context", "casteist a\\\\hole and that too by calling > white Americans in my university", "this is really relevant here, but from my high > school and college", "you think that can enable you to take some kind of action?\" I", "* Other PhD students * The department chair * The Diap * HR", "all from a non privileged caste. I've lost touch a > little bit,", "be dealt with by the Title IX office, but certainly > there were", "were major serious incidents there that they should have dealt > with. Caste", "so I gave sincere advice. Then I read this reply by the OP", "stem from the fact > that I'm a high caste individual, and look", "middle school when I > was more swayed by the opinion of General", "and swearing: * Other PhD students * The department chair * The Diap", "PhD students * The department chair * The Diap * HR * Multiple", "as an abominable low caste, and that automatically creates a lot of problems.", "the linked chat room from the same OP: > > I wrote this", "be such progressives that they make caste a > protected class, but with", "in light of the quote above, it seems more plausible that either the", "friends I made in college, about half of them > were from a", "OP: > > I wrote this after documenting a huge number of incidents", "I read this reply by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just", "But in light of the quote above, it seems more plausible that either", "Then I looked back over the rest of the posts, and I'm not", "from my high > school and college days (my opinion changed from middle", "felt a bit sick myself talking in this manner with these disgusting >", "I hope in the discussion, I could make it clear that I don't", "literally four of my most closest friends who I hung out with >", "university were an abominable lower > caste'. The idea was to bark back.", "me. > Do you think that can enable you to take some kind", "them > were from a non privileged caste. We never discussed caste then", "wanted to see > their reaction; if they would do anything now that", "out with > in college were all from a non privileged caste. I've", "from the fact > that I'm a high caste individual, and look around", "office: \"Actually a lot of these problems stem from the fact > that", "reservation in India and why it > is important for it to continue", "or more likely, the whole post is an elaborate and puzzling attempt at", "I'm a high caste individual, and look around in this university > and", "this thread > or the chat probably covers at most 30% of everything", "dimwitted peasant class that is a natural anathema for me. > Do you", "trying to conjure > up an image of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole", "automatically creates a lot of problems. > > > I had to re-read", "have added caste as a protected class, if I'm not > wrong. I", "discussed caste then of > course. In fact literally four of my most", "the OP is the problem, or more likely, the whole post is an", "that they should have dealt > with. Caste is officially a protected category", "around me), I > have openly advocated for caste based reservation in India", "individual, and look around in this university > and see a dimwitted peasant", "OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday (September 19th): > >", "highest voted answer to [this controversial post regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158).", "all of the documented > incidents could be dealt with by the Title", "to continue for at least a few generations, and > have faced the", "that too by calling > white Americans in my university lower castes by", "continuing dismissals of all incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This", "> thus showed off it's progressive cred.I should mention that in the >", "I hope I could make > the context clearer; I was basically trolling,", "for caste based reservation in India and why it > is important for", "for it to continue for at least a few generations, and > have", "it being particularly useful to other readers. I'm not sure what the appropriate", "meant to slander them > even further. I mean, caste should be a", "> Do you think that can enable you to take some kind of", "'white people in the university were an abominable lower > caste'. The idea", "non privileged caste. I've lost touch a > little bit, but good old", "could make it clear that I don't actually view white people in my", "of the posts, and I'm not sure what to make of it. The", "in my university lower castes by default, in a > farcical tone. None", "the above comment? Some more context from the linked chat room from the", "posted yesterday (September 19th): > > In the end, I remarked to this", "last email to the > Title IX office: \"Actually a lot of these", "fine. I wanted to see > their reaction; if they would do anything", "more plausible that either the OP is the problem, or more likely, the", "So what does the rest of the community think? Am I being overly", "I'm not sure what the appropriate action would be though. So what does", "Am I being overly harsh in my judgment after reading the above comment?", "(my opinion changed from middle school when I > was more swayed by", "> have faced the wrath of some of my friends for saying this.", "administration was > pretty much over, after their continuing dismissals of all incidents.", "context was that this > university made headlines by adding caste as a", "progressives that they make caste a > protected class, but with this cabal,", "and why it > is important for it to continue for at least", "the opinion of General category folk around me), I > have openly advocated", "for continuing politeness with our university administration was > pretty much over, after", "high caste individual, and look around in this university > and see a", "for at least a few generations, and > have faced the wrath of", "poster deserves the benefit of the doubt, so I gave sincere advice. Then", "our university administration was > pretty much over, after their continuing dismissals of", "can enable you to take some kind of action?\" I did > not", "that can enable you to take some kind of action?\" I did >", "inside our > department, and got a reply from the Title IX office", "benefit of the doubt, so I gave sincere advice. Then I read this", "close friends I made in college, about half of them > were from", "university as an abominable low caste, and that automatically creates a lot of", "this > is what you would call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but I", "> > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly what I had", "to conjure > up an image of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and", "below, I've now closed the question (MO).* I have the highest voted answer", "> little bit, but good old days, and we'll meet again! But again,", "end, I remarked to this individual that one serious problem is that I'm", "that this person landed at the most racist institution in all of Massachusetts.", "by default, in a > farcical tone. None of this is really relevant", "At a minimum the conversation has become so focused on this person's bizarre", "tone. None of this is really relevant here, but from my high >", "of the quote above, it seems more plausible that either the OP is", "little bit, but good old days, and we'll meet again! But again, this", "of everything documented > there. > > > OP later clarified: > >", "office, but certainly > there were major serious incidents there that they should", "an elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling. At a minimum the conversation has", "basically casteist. This was meant to slander them > even further. I mean,", "lower castes by default, in a > farcical tone. None of this is", "I > felt a bit sick myself talking in this manner with these", "incidents could be dealt with by the Title IX office, but certainly >", "but good old days, and we'll meet again! But again, this > is", "on this person's bizarre situation that I can't imagine it being particularly useful", "I felt the > time for continuing politeness with our university administration was", "protected class, but with this cabal, it felt fine. I wanted to see", "But again, this > is what you would call \"reactive behavior\" at best,", "The idea was to bark back. The context was that this > university", "of people with some very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and swearing: ", "rest of the community think? Am I being overly harsh in my judgment", "linked chat room from the same OP: > > I wrote this after", "In the end, I remarked to this individual that one serious problem is", "my most closest friends who I hung out with > in college were", "can't imagine it being particularly useful to other readers. I'm not sure what", "I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back over the rest of the posts,", "few generations, and > have faced the wrath of some of my friends", "showed off it's progressive cred.I should mention that in the > prior emails,", "the documentation that I had was huge, and this thread > or the", "not > wrong. I was basically baiting them at this point. I hope", "privileged caste. We never discussed caste then of > course. In fact literally", "and got a reply from the Title IX office saying there's > nothing", "half of them > were from a non privileged caste. We never discussed", "minimum the conversation has become so focused on this person's bizarre situation that", "what does the rest of the community think? Am I being overly harsh", "this cabal, it felt fine. I wanted to see > their reaction; if", "> not say 'white people in the university were an abominable lower >", "should mention that in the > prior emails, the documentation that I had", "and I'm not sure what to make of it. The OP implicates the", "either the OP is the problem, or more likely, the whole post is", "looked back over the rest of the posts, and I'm not sure what", "after documenting a huge number of incidents inside our > department, and got", "why it > is important for it to continue for at least a", "and we'll meet again! But again, this > is what you would call", "wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back over the rest of the posts, and", "class, if I'm not > wrong. I was basically baiting them at this", "hung out with > in college were all from a non privileged caste.", "very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and swearing: Other PhD students ", "above, it seems more plausible that either the OP is the problem, or", "friends for saying this. Of the > handful of really close friends I", "see > their reaction; if they would do anything now that I claimed", "the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday (September 19th): >", "chat room from the same OP: > > I wrote this after documenting", "you to take some kind of action?\" I did > not say 'white", "> school and college days (my opinion changed from middle school when I", "are quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves the benefit of the doubt, so", "from middle school when I > was more swayed by the opinion of", "[this controversial post regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the", "the problem, or more likely, the whole post is an elaborate and puzzling", "myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and that too by calling > white Americans", "Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP are quite extraordinary, but the poster", "manner with these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to be such progressives that", " Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that this person landed at the most", "lot of problems. > > > I had to re-read it to make", "anathema for me. > Do you think that can enable you to take", "changed from middle school when I > was more swayed by the opinion", "my university as an abominable low caste, and that automatically creates a lot", "kind of action?\" I did > not say 'white people in the university", "but certainly > there were major serious incidents there that they should have", "the > handful of really close friends I made in college, about half", "a high caste individual, and look at white people in my university as", "a non privileged caste. I've lost touch a > little bit, but good", "be a protected class, but very very > few places in the US", "to re-read it to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back", "cred.I should mention that in the > prior emails, the documentation that I", "all incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly what", "continue for at least a few generations, and > have faced the wrath", "to this individual that one serious problem is that I'm a high caste", "Given the clear outcome of the poll below, I've now closed the question", "conversation has become so focused on this person's bizarre situation that I can't", "In fact literally four of my most closest friends who I hung out", "politeness with our university administration was > pretty much over, after their continuing", "our > department, and got a reply from the Title IX office saying", "confrontations and swearing: Other PhD students * The department chair * The", "back over the rest of the posts, and I'm not sure what to", "progressive cred.I should mention that in the > prior emails, the documentation that", "was just posted yesterday (September 19th): > > In the end, I remarked", "I wanted to see > their reaction; if they would do anything now", "do anything now that I claimed that the > whole problem was basically", "should be a protected class, but very very > few places in the", "I'm not sure if all of the documented > incidents could be dealt", "> university made headlines by adding caste as a protected class, and >", "the whole post is an elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling. At a", "problem, or more likely, the whole post is an elaborate and puzzling attempt", "to bark back. The context was that this > university made headlines by", "is an elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling. At a minimum the conversation", "judgment after reading the above comment? Some more context from the linked chat", "Title IX office: \"Actually a lot of these problems stem from the fact", "of action?\" I did > not say 'white people in the university were", "or the chat probably covers at most 30% of everything documented > there.", "hope in the discussion, I could make it clear that I don't actually", "institution in all of Massachusetts. But in light of the quote above, it", "> caste'. The idea was to bark back. The context was that this", "with these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to be such progressives that they", "white people in my university as a lower caste, or want to look", "around in this university > and see a dimwitted peasant class that is", "college, about half of them > were from a non privileged caste. We", "situation that I can't imagine it being particularly useful to other readers. I'm", "if all of the documented > incidents could be dealt with by the", "harsh in my judgment after reading the above comment? Some more context from", "more swayed by the opinion of General category folk around me), I >", "huge number of incidents inside our > department, and got a reply from", "even further. I mean, caste should be a protected class, but very very", "baiting them at this point. I hope I could make > the context", "of the doubt, so I gave sincere advice. Then I read this reply", "class that is a natural anathema for me. > Do you think that", "chair * The Diap * HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that", "then of > course. In fact literally four of my most closest friends", "I could make > the context clearer; I was basically trolling, and trying", "This was exactly what I had written in the very last email to", "I'm not sure what to make of it. The OP implicates the following", "in the very last email to the > Title IX office: \"Actually a", "I looked back over the rest of the posts, and I'm not sure", "actually view white people in my university as a lower caste, or want", "make it clear that I don't actually view white people in my university", "I had written in the very last email to the > Title IX", "important for it to continue for at least a few generations, and >", "\"Actually a lot of these problems stem from the fact > that I'm", "that I can't imagine it being particularly useful to other readers. I'm not", "protected class, and > thus showed off it's progressive cred.I should mention that", "with > in college were all from a non privileged caste. I've lost", "of these problems stem from the fact > that I'm a high caste", "student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP are quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves", "I'm a high caste individual, and look at white people in my university", "controversial post regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP", "high > school and college days (my opinion changed from middle school when", "really relevant here, but from my high > school and college days (my", "the conversation has become so focused on this person's bizarre situation that I", "who I hung out with > in college were all from a non", "> OP later clarified: > > I hope in the discussion, I could", "the clear outcome of the poll below, I've now closed the question (MO).", "huge, and this thread > or the chat probably covers at most 30%", "context clearer; I was basically trolling, and trying to conjure > up an", "community think? Am I being overly harsh in my judgment after reading the", "caste. I've lost touch a > little bit, but good old days, and", "> I wrote this after documenting a huge number of incidents inside our", "cabal, it felt fine. I wanted to see > their reaction; if they", "there. > > > OP later clarified: > > I hope in the", "mention that in the > prior emails, the documentation that I had was", "best, but I felt the > time for continuing politeness with our university", "bizarre situation that I can't imagine it being particularly useful to other readers.", "(MO). I have the highest voted answer to [this controversial post regarding racism", "other readers. I'm not sure what the appropriate action would be though. So", "added caste as a protected class, if I'm not > wrong. I was", "Title IX office saying there's > nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not sure", "conjure > up an image of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and that", "this point. I hope I could make > the context clearer; I was", "that was just posted yesterday (September 19th): > > In the end, I", "incidents inside our > department, and got a reply from the Title IX", "them at this point. I hope I could make > the context clearer;", "at trolling. At a minimum the conversation has become so focused on this", "my university as a lower caste, or want to look down on lower", "relevant here, but from my high > school and college days (my opinion", "[comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly what I had written in the very", "very very > few places in the US have added caste as a", "posts, and I'm not sure what to make of it. The OP implicates", "saying there's > nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not sure if all of", "I've now closed the question (MO).* I have the highest voted answer to", "class, but very very > few places in the US have added caste", "such progressives that they make caste a > protected class, but with this", "sick myself talking in this manner with these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend", "if I'm not > wrong. I was basically baiting them at this point.", "an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP are quite extraordinary, but the", "from the Title IX office saying there's > nothing really wrong. Actually I'm", "read this reply by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted", "plausible that either the OP is the problem, or more likely, the whole", "in this manner with these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to be such", "for saying this. Of the > handful of really close friends I made", "university made headlines by adding caste as a protected class, and > thus", "re-read it to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back over", "possible that this person landed at the most racist institution in all of", "the community think? Am I being overly harsh in my judgment after reading", "trolling. At a minimum the conversation has become so focused on this person's", "action would be though. So what does the rest of the community think?", "> white Americans in my university lower castes by default, in a >", "up an image of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and that too by", "closest friends who I hung out with > in college were all from", "from the same OP: > > I wrote this after documenting a huge", "make of it. The OP implicates the following list of people with some", "remarked to this individual that one serious problem is that I'm a high", "and that too by calling > white Americans in my university lower castes", "is important for it to continue for at least a few generations, and", "that is a natural anathema for me. > Do you think that can", "focused on this person's bizarre situation that I can't imagine it being particularly", "> > > I had to re-read it to make sure I wasn't", "the following list of people with some very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations", "were from a non privileged caste. We never discussed caste then of >", "fact literally four of my most closest friends who I hung out with", "pretty much over, after their continuing dismissals of all incidents. > > >", "college were all from a non privileged caste. I've lost touch a >", "extraordinary, but the poster deserves the benefit of the doubt, so I gave", "there that they should have dealt > with. Caste is officially a protected", "from a non privileged caste. I've lost touch a > little bit, but", "> Title IX office: \"Actually a lot of these problems stem from the", "I had was huge, and this thread > or the chat probably covers", "and this thread > or the chat probably covers at most 30% of", "> > > OP later clarified: > > I hope in the discussion,", "deserves the benefit of the doubt, so I gave sincere advice. Then I", "notice:** Given the clear outcome of the poll below, I've now closed the", "in a > farcical tone. None of this is really relevant here, but", "is a natural anathema for me. > Do you think that can enable", "is officially a protected category in this university. I > felt a bit", "most racist institution in all of Massachusetts. But in light of the quote", "Massachusetts. But in light of the quote above, it seems more plausible that", "certainly > there were major serious incidents there that they should have dealt", "Mod's notice:* Given the clear outcome of the poll below, I've now closed", "so focused on this person's bizarre situation that I can't imagine it being", "was to bark back. The context was that this > university made headlines", "that they make caste a > protected class, but with this cabal, it", "of my friends for saying this. Of the > handful of really close", "not sure what to make of it. The OP implicates the following list", "now that I claimed that the > whole problem was basically casteist. This", "problem is that I'm a high caste individual, and look at white people", "had was huge, and this thread > or the chat probably covers at", "caste, or want to look down on lower castes in India. > >", "me), I > have openly advocated for caste based reservation in India and", "likely, the whole post is an elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling. At", "in my judgment after reading the above comment? Some more context from the", "white people in my university as an abominable low caste, and that automatically", "useful to other readers. I'm not sure what the appropriate action would be", "Actually I'm not sure if all of the documented > incidents could be", "is the problem, or more likely, the whole post is an elaborate and", "attempt at trolling. At a minimum the conversation has become so focused on", "at this point. I hope I could make > the context clearer; I", "the highest voted answer to [this controversial post regarding racism against an Indian", "college days (my opinion changed from middle school when I > was more", "handful of really close friends I made in college, about half of them", "natural anathema for me. > Do you think that can enable you to", "everything documented > there. > > > OP later clarified: > > I", " The department chair * The Diap * HR * Multiple faculty It's", "does the rest of the community think? Am I being overly harsh in", "sure if all of the documented > incidents could be dealt with by", "It's certainly possible that this person landed at the most racist institution in", "Of the > handful of really close friends I made in college, about", "but the poster deserves the benefit of the doubt, so I gave sincere", "would be though. So what does the rest of the community think? Am", "but from my high > school and college days (my opinion changed from", "> > This was exactly what I had written in the very last", "with some very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and swearing: * Other PhD", "over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and swearing: * Other PhD students * The", "by the opinion of General category folk around me), I > have openly", "days, and we'll meet again! But again, this > is what you would", "class, but with this cabal, it felt fine. I wanted to see >", "was > pretty much over, after their continuing dismissals of all incidents. >", "it to continue for at least a few generations, and > have faced", "of my most closest friends who I hung out with > in college", "> whole problem was basically casteist. This was meant to slander them >", "I have the highest voted answer to [this controversial post regarding racism against", "in my university as a lower caste, or want to look down on", "but with this cabal, it felt fine. I wanted to see > their", "say 'white people in the university were an abominable lower > caste'. The", "sincere advice. Then I read this reply by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314)", "that I claimed that the > whole problem was basically casteist. This was", "thread > or the chat probably covers at most 30% of everything documented", "my judgment after reading the above comment? Some more context from the linked", "a > farcical tone. None of this is really relevant here, but from", "course. In fact literally four of my most closest friends who I hung", "officially a protected category in this university. I > felt a bit sick", "continuing politeness with our university administration was > pretty much over, after their", "lower > caste'. The idea was to bark back. The context was that", "by calling > white Americans in my university lower castes by default, in", "least a few generations, and > have faced the wrath of some of", "quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves the benefit of the doubt, so I", "mean, caste should be a protected class, but very very > few places", "trolling, and trying to conjure > up an image of myself as a", "time for continuing politeness with our university administration was > pretty much over,", "four of my most closest friends who I hung out with > in", "it. The OP implicates the following list of people with some very over-the-top", "We never discussed caste then of > course. In fact literally four of", "IX office: \"Actually a lot of these problems stem from the fact >", "some kind of action?\" I did > not say 'white people in the", "make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back over the rest of", "the doubt, so I gave sincere advice. Then I read this reply by", "> > I wrote this after documenting a huge number of incidents inside", "> their reaction; if they would do anything now that I claimed that", "to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back over the rest", "as a protected class, and > thus showed off it's progressive cred.I should", "protected class, if I'm not > wrong. I was basically baiting them at", "this after documenting a huge number of incidents inside our > department, and", "> > I had to re-read it to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding.", "faced the wrath of some of my friends for saying this. Of the", "voted answer to [this controversial post regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The", "> few places in the US have added caste as a protected class,", "look around in this university > and see a dimwitted peasant class that", "not say 'white people in the university were an abominable lower > caste'.", "did > not say 'white people in the university were an abominable lower", "lost touch a > little bit, but good old days, and we'll meet", "a casteist a\\\\hole and that too by calling > white Americans in my", "were all from a non privileged caste. I've lost touch a > little", "physical confrontations and swearing: * Other PhD students * The department chair ", "light of the quote above, it seems more plausible that either the OP", "claimed that the > whole problem was basically casteist. This was meant to", "OP implicates the following list of people with some very over-the-top racism, including", "certainly possible* that this person landed at the most racist institution in all", "to slander them > even further. I mean, caste should be a protected", "from a non privileged caste. We never discussed caste then of > course.", "racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP are quite extraordinary,", "this individual that one serious problem is that I'm a high caste individual,", "> course. In fact literally four of my most closest friends who I", "in this university > and see a dimwitted peasant class that is a", "most closest friends who I hung out with > in college were all", "with. Caste is officially a protected category in this university. I > felt", "of some of my friends for saying this. Of the > handful of", "protected category in this university. I > felt a bit sick myself talking", "I was basically baiting them at this point. I hope I could make", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday (September 19th): > > In the end,", "* The Diap * HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that this", "but very very > few places in the US have added caste as", "I've lost touch a > little bit, but good old days, and we'll", "puzzling attempt at trolling. At a minimum the conversation has become so focused", "a protected class, if I'm not > wrong. I was basically baiting them", "of it. The OP implicates the following list of people with some very", "as a protected class, if I'm not > wrong. I was basically baiting", "closed the question (MO).* I have the highest voted answer to [this controversial", "white Americans in my university lower castes by default, in a > farcical", "what I had written in the very last email to the > Title", "would call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but I felt the > time for", "students * The department chair * The Diap * HR * Multiple faculty", "of General category folk around me), I > have openly advocated for caste", "headlines by adding caste as a protected class, and > thus showed off", "outcome of the poll below, I've now closed the question (MO).* I have", "the context clearer; I was basically trolling, and trying to conjure > up", "> I hope in the discussion, I could make it clear that I", "The Diap * HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that this person", "idea was to bark back. The context was that this > university made", "\"reactive behavior\" at best, but I felt the > time for continuing politeness", "category folk around me), I > have openly advocated for caste based reservation", "university as a lower caste, or want to look down on lower castes", "wrong. I was basically baiting them at this point. I hope I could", "readers. I'm not sure what the appropriate action would be though. So what", "peasant class that is a natural anathema for me. > Do you think", "caste as a protected class, if I'm not > wrong. I was basically", "to the > Title IX office: \"Actually a lot of these problems stem", "caste, and that automatically creates a lot of problems. > > > I", "what you would call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but I felt the >", "I had to re-read it to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I", "for me. > Do you think that can enable you to take some", "it seems more plausible that either the OP is the problem, or more", "in college were all from a non privileged caste. I've lost touch a", "I being overly harsh in my judgment after reading the above comment? Some", "whole problem was basically casteist. This was meant to slander them > even", "behavior\" at best, but I felt the > time for continuing politeness with", "adding caste as a protected class, and > thus showed off it's progressive", "hypocrites who pretend to be such progressives that they make caste a >", "these problems stem from the fact > that I'm a high caste individual,", "Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that this person landed at the most racist", "to [this controversial post regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in", "could make > the context clearer; I was basically trolling, and trying to", "including physical confrontations and swearing: * Other PhD students * The department chair", "regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP are quite", "dealt with by the Title IX office, but certainly > there were major", "anything now that I claimed that the > whole problem was basically casteist.", "hope I could make > the context clearer; I was basically trolling, and", "Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly what I had written in the", "from the linked chat room from the same OP: > > I wrote", "or want to look down on lower castes in India. > > >", "> felt a bit sick myself talking in this manner with these disgusting", "swearing: * Other PhD students * The department chair * The Diap ", "was basically trolling, and trying to conjure > up an image of myself", "the poll below, I've now closed the question (MO). I have the highest", "> up an image of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and that too", "casteist. This was meant to slander them > even further. I mean, caste", "that the > whole problem was basically casteist. This was meant to slander", "in the > prior emails, the documentation that I had was huge, and", "there were major serious incidents there that they should have dealt > with.", "and college days (my opinion changed from middle school when I > was", "now closed the question (MO).* I have the highest voted answer to [this", "back. The context was that this > university made headlines by adding caste", "a lot of these problems stem from the fact > that I'm a", "claims in the OP are quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves the benefit", "look at white people in my university as an abominable low caste, and", "> incidents could be dealt with by the Title IX office, but certainly", "Americans in my university lower castes by default, in a > farcical tone.", "a > little bit, but good old days, and we'll meet again! But", "pretend to be such progressives that they make caste a > protected class,", "> have openly advocated for caste based reservation in India and why it", "were an abominable lower > caste'. The idea was to bark back. The", "think that can enable you to take some kind of action?\" I did", "people in my university as a lower caste, or want to look down", "saying this. Of the > handful of really close friends I made in", "reply by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday (September", "> protected class, but with this cabal, it felt fine. I wanted to", "misunderstanding. Then I looked back over the rest of the posts, and I'm", "my university lower castes by default, in a > farcical tone. None of", "in the OP are quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves the benefit of", "to take some kind of action?\" I did > not say 'white people", "against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims in the OP are quite extraordinary, but", "this person landed at the most racist institution in all of Massachusetts. But", "the very last email to the > Title IX office: \"Actually a lot", "swayed by the opinion of General category folk around me), I > have", "the Title IX office saying there's > nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not", "documented > there. > > > OP later clarified: > > I hope", "old days, and we'll meet again! But again, this > is what you", "serious problem is that I'm a high caste individual, and look at white", "OP is the problem, or more likely, the whole post is an elaborate", "> is what you would call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but I felt", "over, after their continuing dismissals of all incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186):", "here, but from my high > school and college days (my opinion changed", "low caste, and that automatically creates a lot of problems. > > >", "after their continuing dismissals of all incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): >", "and > thus showed off it's progressive cred.I should mention that in the", "on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday (September 19th): > > In", "following list of people with some very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and", "caste individual, and look around in this university > and see a dimwitted", "more context from the linked chat room from the same OP: > >", "a few generations, and > have faced the wrath of some of my", "None of this is really relevant here, but from my high > school", "of > course. In fact literally four of my most closest friends who", "clear that I don't actually view white people in my university as a", "the US have added caste as a protected class, if I'm not >", "just posted yesterday (September 19th): > > In the end, I remarked to", "comment? Some more context from the linked chat room from the same OP:", "yesterday (September 19th): > > In the end, I remarked to this individual", "very > few places in the US have added caste as a protected", "in college, about half of them > were from a non privileged caste.", "I hung out with > in college were all from a non privileged", "good old days, and we'll meet again! But again, this > is what", "friends who I hung out with > in college were all from a", "a protected class, and > thus showed off it's progressive cred.I should mention", "the chat probably covers at most 30% of everything documented > there. >", "and trying to conjure > up an image of myself as a casteist", "documentation that I had was huge, and this thread > or the chat", "default, in a > farcical tone. None of this is really relevant here,", "(September 19th): > > In the end, I remarked to this individual that", "This was meant to slander them > even further. I mean, caste should", "with by the Title IX office, but certainly > there were major serious", "Do you think that can enable you to take some kind of action?\"", "above comment? Some more context from the linked chat room from the same", "the > time for continuing politeness with our university administration was > pretty", "one serious problem is that I'm a high caste individual, and look at", "is what you would call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but I felt the", "by adding caste as a protected class, and > thus showed off it's", "touch a > little bit, but good old days, and we'll meet again!", "chat probably covers at most 30% of everything documented > there. > >", "creates a lot of problems. > > > I had to re-read it", "being overly harsh in my judgment after reading the above comment? Some more", "made in college, about half of them > were from a non privileged", "racist institution in all of Massachusetts. But in light of the quote above,", "disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to be such progressives that they make caste", "of really close friends I made in college, about half of them >", "bark back. The context was that this > university made headlines by adding", "the fact > that I'm a high caste individual, and look around in", "caste. We never discussed caste then of > course. In fact literally four", "they should have dealt > with. Caste is officially a protected category in", "image of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and that too by calling >", "a natural anathema for me. > Do you think that can enable you", "prior emails, the documentation that I had was huge, and this thread >", "and that automatically creates a lot of problems. > > > I had", "and puzzling attempt at trolling. At a minimum the conversation has become so", "that I don't actually view white people in my university as a lower", "it > is important for it to continue for at least a few", "documenting a huge number of incidents inside our > department, and got a", "my high > school and college days (my opinion changed from middle school", "wrath of some of my friends for saying this. Of the > handful", "Some more context from the linked chat room from the same OP: >", "not sure what the appropriate action would be though. So what does the", "reply from the Title IX office saying there's > nothing really wrong. Actually", "19th): > > In the end, I remarked to this individual that one", "some very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and swearing: * Other PhD students", "in India and why it > is important for it to continue for", "of this is really relevant here, but from my high > school and", "> prior emails, the documentation that I had was huge, and this thread", "basically trolling, and trying to conjure > up an image of myself as", "nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not sure if all of the documented >", "is that I'm a high caste individual, and look at white people in", "of the poll below, I've now closed the question (MO).* I have the", "what to make of it. The OP implicates the following list of people", "of them > were from a non privileged caste. We never discussed caste", "caste a > protected class, but with this cabal, it felt fine. I", "a dimwitted peasant class that is a natural anathema for me. > Do", "had to re-read it to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked", "> wrong. I was basically baiting them at this point. I hope I", "never discussed caste then of > course. In fact literally four of my", "probably covers at most 30% of everything documented > there. > > >", "a lot of problems. > > > I had to re-read it to", "a non privileged caste. We never discussed caste then of > course. In", "of incidents inside our > department, and got a reply from the Title", "in the discussion, I could make it clear that I don't actually view", "there's > nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not sure if all of the", "the rest of the posts, and I'm not sure what to make of", "the end, I remarked to this individual that one serious problem is that", "> farcical tone. None of this is really relevant here, but from my", "talking in this manner with these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to be", "that this > university made headlines by adding caste as a protected class,", "they make caste a > protected class, but with this cabal, it felt", "that either the OP is the problem, or more likely, the whole post", "thus showed off it's progressive cred.I should mention that in the > prior", "the discussion, I could make it clear that I don't actually view white", "this person's bizarre situation that I can't imagine it being particularly useful to", "same OP: > > I wrote this after documenting a huge number of", "and look around in this university > and see a dimwitted peasant class", "have openly advocated for caste based reservation in India and why it >", "> > OP later clarified: > > I hope in the discussion, I", "> that I'm a high caste individual, and look around in this university", "at white people in my university as an abominable low caste, and that", "my friends for saying this. Of the > handful of really close friends", "not sure if all of the documented > incidents could be dealt with", "whole post is an elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling. At a minimum", "reading the above comment? Some more context from the linked chat room from", "by the Title IX office, but certainly > there were major serious incidents", "made headlines by adding caste as a protected class, and > thus showed", "this reply by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday", "a\\\\hole and that too by calling > white Americans in my university lower", "university. I > felt a bit sick myself talking in this manner with", "written in the very last email to the > Title IX office: \"Actually", "of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and that too by calling > white", "30% of everything documented > there. > > > OP later clarified: >", "the poster deserves the benefit of the doubt, so I gave sincere advice.", "The department chair * The Diap * HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly", "discussion, I could make it clear that I don't actually view white people", "they would do anything now that I claimed that the > whole problem", "sure what the appropriate action would be though. So what does the rest", "room from the same OP: > > I wrote this after documenting a", "of the documented > incidents could be dealt with by the Title IX", "> there were major serious incidents there that they should have dealt >", "> with. Caste is officially a protected category in this university. I >", "caste individual, and look at white people in my university as an abominable", "that I'm a high caste individual, and look at white people in my", "the > whole problem was basically casteist. This was meant to slander them", "quote above, it seems more plausible that either the OP is the problem,", "with this cabal, it felt fine. I wanted to see > their reaction;", "poll below, I've now closed the question (MO).* I have the highest voted", "individual, and look at white people in my university as an abominable low", "it to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back over the", "university lower castes by default, in a > farcical tone. None of this", "much over, after their continuing dismissals of all incidents. > > > Further", "their continuing dismissals of all incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > >", "serious incidents there that they should have dealt > with. Caste is officially", "felt the > time for continuing politeness with our university administration was >", "this manner with these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to be such progressives", "question (MO).* I have the highest voted answer to [this controversial post regarding", "I could make it clear that I don't actually view white people in", "off it's progressive cred.I should mention that in the > prior emails, the", "myself talking in this manner with these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to", "the > prior emails, the documentation that I had was huge, and this", "of Massachusetts. But in light of the quote above, it seems more plausible", "> the context clearer; I was basically trolling, and trying to conjure >", "> This was exactly what I had written in the very last email", "individual that one serious problem is that I'm a high caste individual, and", "sure what to make of it. The OP implicates the following list of", "> were from a non privileged caste. We never discussed caste then of", "implicates the following list of people with some very over-the-top racism, including physical", "places in the US have added caste as a protected class, if I'm", "> > I hope in the discussion, I could make it clear that", "the quote above, it seems more plausible that either the OP is the", "and see a dimwitted peasant class that is a natural anathema for me.", "was huge, and this thread > or the chat probably covers at most", "The claims in the OP are quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves the", "caste'. The idea was to bark back. The context was that this >", "meet again! But again, this > is what you would call \"reactive behavior\"", "very last email to the > Title IX office: \"Actually a lot of", "days (my opinion changed from middle school when I > was more swayed", "felt fine. I wanted to see > their reaction; if they would do", "problem was basically casteist. This was meant to slander them > even further.", "an abominable low caste, and that automatically creates a lot of problems. >", "them > even further. I mean, caste should be a protected class, but", "in the US have added caste as a protected class, if I'm not", "that in the > prior emails, the documentation that I had was huge,", "have faced the wrath of some of my friends for saying this. Of", "post is an elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling. At a minimum the", "> department, and got a reply from the Title IX office saying there's", "castes by default, in a > farcical tone. None of this is really", "farcical tone. None of this is really relevant here, but from my high", "folk around me), I > have openly advocated for caste based reservation in", "at most 30% of everything documented > there. > > > OP later", "later clarified: > > I hope in the discussion, I could make it", "their reaction; if they would do anything now that I claimed that the", "I don't actually view white people in my university as a lower caste,", "the > Title IX office: \"Actually a lot of these problems stem from", "Other PhD students * The department chair * The Diap * HR ", "clarified: > > I hope in the discussion, I could make it clear", "list of people with some very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and swearing:", "> is important for it to continue for at least a few generations,", "emails, the documentation that I had was huge, and this thread > or", "seems more plausible that either the OP is the problem, or more likely,", "caste based reservation in India and why it > is important for it", "imagine it being particularly useful to other readers. I'm not sure what the", "this. Of the > handful of really close friends I made in college,", "was basically baiting them at this point. I hope I could make >", "call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but I felt the > time for continuing", "some of my friends for saying this. Of the > handful of really", "is really relevant here, but from my high > school and college days", "I gave sincere advice. Then I read this reply by the OP on", "of problems. > > > I had to re-read it to make sure", "> hypocrites who pretend to be such progressives that they make caste a", "major serious incidents there that they should have dealt > with. Caste is", "the documented > incidents could be dealt with by the Title IX office,", "about half of them > were from a non privileged caste. We never", "abominable low caste, and that automatically creates a lot of problems. > >", "department, and got a reply from the Title IX office saying there's >", "think? Am I being overly harsh in my judgment after reading the above", "person's bizarre situation that I can't imagine it being particularly useful to other", "a bit sick myself talking in this manner with these disgusting > hypocrites", "non privileged caste. We never discussed caste then of > course. In fact", "people in the university were an abominable lower > caste'. The idea was", "it felt fine. I wanted to see > their reaction; if they would", "again! But again, this > is what you would call \"reactive behavior\" at", "General category folk around me), I > have openly advocated for caste based", "these disgusting > hypocrites who pretend to be such progressives that they make", "> handful of really close friends I made in college, about half of", "a lower caste, or want to look down on lower castes in India.", "problems stem from the fact > that I'm a high caste individual, and", "I'm not > wrong. I was basically baiting them at this point. I", "people with some very over-the-top racism, including physical confrontations and swearing: Other", "The OP implicates the following list of people with some very over-the-top racism,", "a protected category in this university. I > felt a bit sick myself", "category in this university. I > felt a bit sick myself talking in", "elaborate and puzzling attempt at trolling. At a minimum the conversation has become", "the rest of the community think? Am I being overly harsh in my", "problems. > > > I had to re-read it to make sure I", "IX office, but certainly > there were major serious incidents there that they", "openly advocated for caste based reservation in India and why it > is", "a reply from the Title IX office saying there's > nothing really wrong.", "a protected class, but very very > few places in the US have", "India and why it > is important for it to continue for at", "caste should be a protected class, but very very > few places in", "it clear that I don't actually view white people in my university as", "was basically casteist. This was meant to slander them > even further. I", "in all of Massachusetts. But in light of the quote above, it seems", "who pretend to be such progressives that they make caste a > protected", "had written in the very last email to the > Title IX office:", "appropriate action would be though. So what does the rest of the community", "to see > their reaction; if they would do anything now that I", "you would call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but I felt the > time", "dismissals of all incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was", "has become so focused on this person's bizarre situation that I can't imagine", "and look at white people in my university as an abominable low caste,", "people in my university as an abominable low caste, and that automatically creates", "take some kind of action?\" I did > not say 'white people in", "the posts, and I'm not sure what to make of it. The OP", "point. I hope I could make > the context clearer; I was basically", "further. I mean, caste should be a protected class, but very very >", "> was more swayed by the opinion of General category folk around me),", "context from the linked chat room from the same OP: > > I", "landed at the most racist institution in all of Massachusetts. But in light", "that I'm a high caste individual, and look around in this university >", "> nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not sure if all of the documented", "of all incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly", "fact > that I'm a high caste individual, and look around in this", "OP later clarified: > > I hope in the discussion, I could make", "the question (MO).* I have the highest voted answer to [this controversial post", "the appropriate action would be though. So what does the rest of the", "to make of it. The OP implicates the following list of people with", "based reservation in India and why it > is important for it to", "we'll meet again! But again, this > is what you would call \"reactive", "abominable lower > caste'. The idea was to bark back. The context was", "particularly useful to other readers. I'm not sure what the appropriate action would", "overly harsh in my judgment after reading the above comment? Some more context", "number of incidents inside our > department, and got a reply from the", "answer to [this controversial post regarding racism against an Indian student](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a/155158#155158). The claims", "I was basically trolling, and trying to conjure > up an image of", "> in college were all from a non privileged caste. I've lost touch", "OP are quite extraordinary, but the poster deserves the benefit of the doubt,", "what the appropriate action would be though. So what does the rest of", "of the community think? Am I being overly harsh in my judgment after", "I made in college, about half of them > were from a non", "to other readers. I'm not sure what the appropriate action would be though.", "school when I > was more swayed by the opinion of General category", "department chair * The Diap * HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly possible", "by the OP on [my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday (September 19th):", "HR * Multiple faculty It's certainly possible that this person landed at the", "> there. > > > OP later clarified: > > I hope in", "advocated for caste based reservation in India and why it > is important", "generations, and > have faced the wrath of some of my friends for", "a high caste individual, and look around in this university > and see", "this university > and see a dimwitted peasant class that is a natural", "US have added caste as a protected class, if I'm not > wrong.", "university administration was > pretty much over, after their continuing dismissals of all", "make caste a > protected class, but with this cabal, it felt fine.", "person landed at the most racist institution in all of Massachusetts. But in", "action?\" I did > not say 'white people in the university were an", "office saying there's > nothing really wrong. Actually I'm not sure if all", "to be such progressives that they make caste a > protected class, but", "the university were an abominable lower > caste'. The idea was to bark", "faculty It's certainly possible that this person landed at the most racist institution", "dealt > with. Caste is officially a protected category in this university. I", "don't actually view white people in my university as a lower caste, or", "should have dealt > with. Caste is officially a protected category in this", "really close friends I made in college, about half of them > were", "this > university made headlines by adding caste as a protected class, and", "in this university. I > felt a bit sick myself talking in this", "really wrong. Actually I'm not sure if all of the documented > incidents", "incidents there that they should have dealt > with. Caste is officially a", "a > protected class, but with this cabal, it felt fine. I wanted", "I > have openly advocated for caste based reservation in India and why", "make > the context clearer; I was basically trolling, and trying to conjure", "that one serious problem is that I'm a high caste individual, and look", "high caste individual, and look at white people in my university as an", "Caste is officially a protected category in this university. I > felt a", "protected class, but very very > few places in the US have added", "have dealt > with. Caste is officially a protected category in this university.", "opinion of General category folk around me), I > have openly advocated for", "sure I wasn't misunderstanding. Then I looked back over the rest of the", "clear outcome of the poll below, I've now closed the question (MO).* I", "> time for continuing politeness with our university administration was > pretty much", "[my answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/155158/57314) that was just posted yesterday (September 19th): > > In the", "incidents. > > > Further [comments](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/155185/how-to-proceed-after-being-threatened-and-treated-poorly-by-university-faculty-a#comment416031_155186): > > This was exactly what I", "> In the end, I remarked to this individual that one serious problem", "covers at most 30% of everything documented > there. > > > OP", "see a dimwitted peasant class that is a natural anathema for me. >", "an image of myself as a casteist a\\\\hole and that too by calling", "basically baiting them at this point. I hope I could make > the", "it's progressive cred.I should mention that in the > prior emails, the documentation", "when I > was more swayed by the opinion of General category folk", "gave sincere advice. Then I read this reply by the OP on [my", "Title IX office, but certainly > there were major serious incidents there that", "caste as a protected class, and > thus showed off it's progressive cred.I", "with our university administration was > pretty much over, after their continuing dismissals", "would do anything now that I claimed that the > whole problem was", "school and college days (my opinion changed from middle school when I >", "was exactly what I had written in the very last email to the", "rest of the posts, and I'm not sure what to make of it.", "the Title IX office, but certainly > there were major serious incidents there", "again, this > is what you would call \"reactive behavior\" at best, but", "the wrath of some of my friends for saying this. Of the >", "opinion changed from middle school when I > was more swayed by the" ]
[ "the community. In addition, I don't want to misguide others with my inaccurate", "or concise and precise. Every answer is super helpful. There is no fight,", "feel guilty if I don't give back in return. How can I effectively", "have very very little experience to offer back to the community. In addition,", "friendly. Every question is either well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every answer is", "I've never found a Stack Exchange site or a QA site comparable with", "site or a QA site comparable with this SE. Every one is super", "a QA site comparable with this SE. Every one is super friendly. Every", "with this SE. Every one is super friendly. Every question is either well-crafted,", "advisor. However, as a student, I have very very little experience to offer", "very very little experience to offer back to the community. In addition, I", "than from my super busy advisor. However, as a student, I have very", "simply helping each others. I've learned much more about academics here than from", "comparable with this SE. Every one is super friendly. Every question is either", "helpful. There is no fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply helping", "to the community. In addition, I don't want to misguide others with my", "much more about academics here than from my super busy advisor. However, as", "and my immaturity. I feel guilty if I don't give back in return.", "from my super busy advisor. However, as a student, I have very very", "one is super friendly. Every question is either well-crafted, or concise and precise.", "There is no fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply helping each", "my inaccurate information and my immaturity. I feel guilty if I don't give", "Every one is super friendly. Every question is either well-crafted, or concise and", "with my inaccurate information and my immaturity. I feel guilty if I don't", "offer back to the community. In addition, I don't want to misguide others", "immaturity. I feel guilty if I don't give back in return. How can", "very little experience to offer back to the community. In addition, I don't", "I have very very little experience to offer back to the community. In", "troubles. Everyone is simply helping each others. I've learned much more about academics", "no politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply helping each others. I've learned much", "However, as a student, I have very very little experience to offer back", "don't want to misguide others with my inaccurate information and my immaturity. I", "In addition, I don't want to misguide others with my inaccurate information and", "I don't want to misguide others with my inaccurate information and my immaturity.", "super friendly. Every question is either well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every answer", "is super helpful. There is no fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone is", "SE. Every one is super friendly. Every question is either well-crafted, or concise", "is either well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every answer is super helpful. There", "super busy advisor. However, as a student, I have very very little experience", "I feel guilty if I don't give back in return. How can I", "back to the community. In addition, I don't want to misguide others with", "well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every answer is super helpful. There is no", "I've learned much more about academics here than from my super busy advisor.", "Every answer is super helpful. There is no fight, no politics, no troubles.", "guilty if I don't give back in return. How can I effectively contribute?", "a Stack Exchange site or a QA site comparable with this SE. Every", "busy advisor. However, as a student, I have very very little experience to", "no fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply helping each others. I've", "my super busy advisor. However, as a student, I have very very little", "community. In addition, I don't want to misguide others with my inaccurate information", "Every question is either well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every answer is super", "others with my inaccurate information and my immaturity. I feel guilty if I", "addition, I don't want to misguide others with my inaccurate information and my", "fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply helping each others. I've learned", "each others. I've learned much more about academics here than from my super", "found a Stack Exchange site or a QA site comparable with this SE.", "here than from my super busy advisor. However, as a student, I have", "as a student, I have very very little experience to offer back to", "more about academics here than from my super busy advisor. However, as a", "experience to offer back to the community. In addition, I don't want to", "misguide others with my inaccurate information and my immaturity. I feel guilty if", "super helpful. There is no fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply", "my immaturity. I feel guilty if I don't give back in return. How", "Exchange site or a QA site comparable with this SE. Every one is", "student, I have very very little experience to offer back to the community.", "answer is super helpful. There is no fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone", "question is either well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every answer is super helpful.", "little experience to offer back to the community. In addition, I don't want", "academics here than from my super busy advisor. However, as a student, I", "site comparable with this SE. Every one is super friendly. Every question is", "is no fight, no politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply helping each others.", "to misguide others with my inaccurate information and my immaturity. I feel guilty", "Everyone is simply helping each others. I've learned much more about academics here", "or a QA site comparable with this SE. Every one is super friendly.", "about academics here than from my super busy advisor. However, as a student,", "either well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every answer is super helpful. There is", "to offer back to the community. In addition, I don't want to misguide", "helping each others. I've learned much more about academics here than from my", "concise and precise. Every answer is super helpful. There is no fight, no", "no troubles. Everyone is simply helping each others. I've learned much more about", "this SE. Every one is super friendly. Every question is either well-crafted, or", "is simply helping each others. I've learned much more about academics here than", "precise. Every answer is super helpful. There is no fight, no politics, no", "others. I've learned much more about academics here than from my super busy", "Stack Exchange site or a QA site comparable with this SE. Every one", "never found a Stack Exchange site or a QA site comparable with this", "is super friendly. Every question is either well-crafted, or concise and precise. Every", "inaccurate information and my immaturity. I feel guilty if I don't give back", "information and my immaturity. I feel guilty if I don't give back in", "QA site comparable with this SE. Every one is super friendly. Every question", "and precise. Every answer is super helpful. There is no fight, no politics,", "politics, no troubles. Everyone is simply helping each others. I've learned much more", "learned much more about academics here than from my super busy advisor. However,", "a student, I have very very little experience to offer back to the", "want to misguide others with my inaccurate information and my immaturity. I feel" ]
[ "a bit of a contentious opening paragraph that I would like to get", "a contentious opening paragraph that I would like to get opinions on from", "doctoral studies and I have a bit of a contentious opening paragraph that", "community perceives it? I’m just trying to get some external opinions from academics", "question with the small intro paragraph I have to see how the community", "get opinions on from the ASE community. I’m wondering if it is okay", "the community perceives it? I’m just trying to get some external opinions from", "I’m just trying to get some external opinions from academics that do not", "see how the community perceives it? I’m just trying to get some external", "intro paragraph I have to see how the community perceives it? I’m just", "SToP for doctoral studies and I have a bit of a contentious opening", "bit of a contentious opening paragraph that I would like to get opinions", "I’m wondering if it is okay to post the question with the small", "okay to post the question with the small intro paragraph I have to", "just trying to get some external opinions from academics that do not know", "how the community perceives it? I’m just trying to get some external opinions", "I have a bit of a contentious opening paragraph that I would like", "on from the ASE community. I’m wondering if it is okay to post", "wondering if it is okay to post the question with the small intro", "of a contentious opening paragraph that I would like to get opinions on", "it is okay to post the question with the small intro paragraph I", "have to see how the community perceives it? I’m just trying to get", "a SToP for doctoral studies and I have a bit of a contentious", "small intro paragraph I have to see how the community perceives it? I’m", "opinions on from the ASE community. I’m wondering if it is okay to", "with the small intro paragraph I have to see how the community perceives", "I have to see how the community perceives it? I’m just trying to", "is okay to post the question with the small intro paragraph I have", "contentious opening paragraph that I would like to get opinions on from the", "and I have a bit of a contentious opening paragraph that I would", "have a bit of a contentious opening paragraph that I would like to", "if it is okay to post the question with the small intro paragraph", "from the ASE community. I’m wondering if it is okay to post the", "to post the question with the small intro paragraph I have to see", "opening paragraph that I would like to get opinions on from the ASE", "to see how the community perceives it? I’m just trying to get some", "am writing a SToP for doctoral studies and I have a bit of", "trying to get some external opinions from academics that do not know me.", "studies and I have a bit of a contentious opening paragraph that I", "for doctoral studies and I have a bit of a contentious opening paragraph", "ASE community. I’m wondering if it is okay to post the question with", "perceives it? I’m just trying to get some external opinions from academics that", "post the question with the small intro paragraph I have to see how", "I am writing a SToP for doctoral studies and I have a bit", "that I would like to get opinions on from the ASE community. I’m", "I would like to get opinions on from the ASE community. I’m wondering", "would like to get opinions on from the ASE community. I’m wondering if", "like to get opinions on from the ASE community. I’m wondering if it", "the ASE community. I’m wondering if it is okay to post the question", "writing a SToP for doctoral studies and I have a bit of a", "community. I’m wondering if it is okay to post the question with the", "to get opinions on from the ASE community. I’m wondering if it is", "the question with the small intro paragraph I have to see how the", "it? I’m just trying to get some external opinions from academics that do", "paragraph I have to see how the community perceives it? I’m just trying", "paragraph that I would like to get opinions on from the ASE community.", "the small intro paragraph I have to see how the community perceives it?" ]
[ "how the moderation could be double-checked?) or do feedback to the user migrate", "to try to contribute a question. I advised a site with academic research", "saying here. But I want to go further because I don't get how", "with academic research tools (it was a tool to discover the network of", "But seems like another \"no written regulation\" on the community. Wich is very", "to see if I received feedback from my replica. But the answer disappeared", "answer the questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close", "already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close to what I am saying", "answer to a comment? Sorry, it is just a specific case that was", "feedback from my replica. But the answer disappeared and I didn't have or", "of answering on the comments, that is somehow common for people censor the", "the answer to the comment? What I mean is: Instead of using a", "somehow common for people censor the answers that may be posted in comments?", "specific case that was happened to me. But seems like another \"no written", "Why don't ask to migrate the answer to a comment? Sorry, it is", "comments. So why regulators censor answers that could be comments? Why don't ask", "denounced and my contribution was seen as website marketing! I tried to use", "what I am saying here. But I want to go further because I", "am saying here. But I want to go further because I don't get", "use comments to answer the questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which", "double check (Besides that how the moderation could be double-checked?) or do feedback", "don't do a double check (Besides that how the moderation could be double-checked?)", "network of existing connections with a specific academic text), but my answer was", "get it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering on the comments, that is somehow", "a double check (Besides that how the moderation could be double-checked?) or do", "text), but my answer was quickly denounced and my contribution was seen as", "(it was a tool to discover the network of existing connections with a", "people use comments to answer the questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question,", "I received feedback from my replica. But the answer disappeared and I didn't", "Wich is very difficult for new members like me to get it. Besides", "ask to migrate the answer to a comment? Sorry, it is just a", "feedback to the user migrate the answer to the comment? What I mean", "case that was happened to me. But seems like another \"no written regulation\"", "comment? What I mean is: Instead of using a comment, I used the", "contribute a question. I advised a site with academic research tools (it was", "a site with academic research tools (it was a tool to discover the", "with a specific academic text), but my answer was quickly denounced and my", "and comments. So why regulators censor answers that could be comments? Why don't", "is very close to what I am saying here. But I want to", "on the community. Wich is very difficult for new members like me to", "how the community uses the answers and comments. So why regulators censor answers", "a comment? Sorry, it is just a specific case that was happened to", "of using a comment, I used the answer to try to contribute a", "tool to discover the network of existing connections with a specific academic text),", "if I received feedback from my replica. But the answer disappeared and I", "very difficult for new members like me to get it. Besides some \"culture\"", "want to go further because I don't get how the community uses the", "people censor the answers that may be posted in comments? If that's the", "contribution was seen as website marketing! I tried to use the edit to", "be comments? Why don't ask to migrate the answer to a comment? Sorry,", "further because I don't get how the community uses the answers and comments.", "was seen as website marketing! I tried to use the edit to see", "some \"culture\" of answering on the comments, that is somehow common for people", "is just a specific case that was happened to me. But seems like", "user migrate the answer to the comment? What I mean is: Instead of", "question, which is very close to what I am saying here. But I", "comments, that is somehow common for people censor the answers that may be", "research tools (it was a tool to discover the network of existing connections", "uses the answers and comments. So why regulators censor answers that could be", "don't ask to migrate the answer to a comment? Sorry, it is just", "and my contribution was seen as website marketing! I tried to use the", "to discover the network of existing connections with a specific academic text), but", "in comments? If that's the case, why people don't do a double check", "of existing connections with a specific academic text), but my answer was quickly", "here. But I want to go further because I don't get how the", "migrate the answer to a comment? Sorry, it is just a specific case", "check (Besides that how the moderation could be double-checked?) or do feedback to", "the answer to a comment? Sorry, it is just a specific case that", "censor the answers that may be posted in comments? If that's the case,", "specific academic text), but my answer was quickly denounced and my contribution was", "be posted in comments? If that's the case, why people don't do a", "discover the network of existing connections with a specific academic text), but my", "could be comments? Why don't ask to migrate the answer to a comment?", "comment? Sorry, it is just a specific case that was happened to me.", "because I don't get how the community uses the answers and comments. So", "answers that could be comments? Why don't ask to migrate the answer to", "censor answers that could be comments? Why don't ask to migrate the answer", "connections with a specific academic text), but my answer was quickly denounced and", "on the comments, that is somehow common for people censor the answers that", "I mean is: Instead of using a comment, I used the answer to", "go further because I don't get how the community uses the answers and", "me to get it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering on the comments, that", "question. I advised a site with academic research tools (it was a tool", "get how the community uses the answers and comments. So why regulators censor", "advised a site with academic research tools (it was a tool to discover", "double-checked?) or do feedback to the user migrate the answer to the comment?", "the questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close to", "the answer to try to contribute a question. I advised a site with", "that how the moderation could be double-checked?) or do feedback to the user", "Besides some \"culture\" of answering on the comments, that is somehow common for", "my contribution was seen as website marketing! I tried to use the edit", "me. But seems like another \"no written regulation\" on the community. Wich is", "tools (it was a tool to discover the network of existing connections with", "like another \"no written regulation\" on the community. Wich is very difficult for", "moderation could be double-checked?) or do feedback to the user migrate the answer", "comments to answer the questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is", "answers that may be posted in comments? If that's the case, why people", "do a double check (Besides that how the moderation could be double-checked?) or", "is: Instead of using a comment, I used the answer to try to", "use the edit to see if I received feedback from my replica. But", "very close to what I am saying here. But I want to go", "it is just a specific case that was happened to me. But seems", "it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering on the comments, that is somehow common", "difficult for new members like me to get it. Besides some \"culture\" of", "a comment, I used the answer to try to contribute a question. I", "the case, why people don't do a double check (Besides that how the", "that was happened to me. But seems like another \"no written regulation\" on", "a specific academic text), but my answer was quickly denounced and my contribution", "But I want to go further because I don't get how the community", "for people censor the answers that may be posted in comments? If that's", "seems like another \"no written regulation\" on the community. Wich is very difficult", "I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close to what I", "I want to go further because I don't get how the community uses", "but my answer was quickly denounced and my contribution was seen as website", "to migrate the answer to a comment? Sorry, it is just a specific", "do feedback to the user migrate the answer to the comment? What I", "community. Wich is very difficult for new members like me to get it.", "the comments, that is somehow common for people censor the answers that may", "used the answer to try to contribute a question. I advised a site", "members like me to get it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering on the", "the community uses the answers and comments. So why regulators censor answers that", "that may be posted in comments? If that's the case, why people don't", "was a tool to discover the network of existing connections with a specific", "existing connections with a specific academic text), but my answer was quickly denounced", "to what I am saying here. But I want to go further because", "from my replica. But the answer disappeared and I didn't have or couldn't", "was happened to me. But seems like another \"no written regulation\" on the", "for new members like me to get it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering", "a tool to discover the network of existing connections with a specific academic", "happened to me. But seems like another \"no written regulation\" on the community.", "or do feedback to the user migrate the answer to the comment? What", "edit to see if I received feedback from my replica. But the answer", "Why people use comments to answer the questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments)", "I used the answer to try to contribute a question. I advised a", "the user migrate the answer to the comment? What I mean is: Instead", "seen as website marketing! I tried to use the edit to see if", "answers and comments. So why regulators censor answers that could be comments? Why", "don't get how the community uses the answers and comments. So why regulators", "may be posted in comments? If that's the case, why people don't do", "If that's the case, why people don't do a double check (Besides that", "people don't do a double check (Besides that how the moderation could be", "to me. But seems like another \"no written regulation\" on the community. Wich", "I tried to use the edit to see if I received feedback from", "regulation\" on the community. Wich is very difficult for new members like me", "posted in comments? If that's the case, why people don't do a double", "the comment? What I mean is: Instead of using a comment, I used", "received feedback from my replica. But the answer disappeared and I didn't have", "I advised a site with academic research tools (it was a tool to", "common for people censor the answers that may be posted in comments? If", "is somehow common for people censor the answers that may be posted in", "that could be comments? Why don't ask to migrate the answer to a", "case, why people don't do a double check (Besides that how the moderation", "why people don't do a double check (Besides that how the moderation could", "to contribute a question. I advised a site with academic research tools (it", "read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close to what I am saying here.", "website marketing! I tried to use the edit to see if I received", "marketing! I tried to use the edit to see if I received feedback", "to get it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering on the comments, that is", "(Besides that how the moderation could be double-checked?) or do feedback to the", "comment, I used the answer to try to contribute a question. I advised", "just a specific case that was happened to me. But seems like another", "like me to get it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering on the comments,", "a question. I advised a site with academic research tools (it was a", "answer to the comment? What I mean is: Instead of using a comment,", "community uses the answers and comments. So why regulators censor answers that could", "using a comment, I used the answer to try to contribute a question.", "academic research tools (it was a tool to discover the network of existing", "why regulators censor answers that could be comments? Why don't ask to migrate", "answer was quickly denounced and my contribution was seen as website marketing! I", "that is somehow common for people censor the answers that may be posted", "I am saying here. But I want to go further because I don't", "is very difficult for new members like me to get it. Besides some", "quickly denounced and my contribution was seen as website marketing! I tried to", "to the comment? What I mean is: Instead of using a comment, I", "regulators censor answers that could be comments? Why don't ask to migrate the", "close to what I am saying here. But I want to go further", "see if I received feedback from my replica. But the answer disappeared and", "to use the edit to see if I received feedback from my replica.", "a specific case that was happened to me. But seems like another \"no", "new members like me to get it. Besides some \"culture\" of answering on", "I don't get how the community uses the answers and comments. So why", "[this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close to what I am saying here. But", "written regulation\" on the community. Wich is very difficult for new members like", "to the user migrate the answer to the comment? What I mean is:", "questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close to what", "mean is: Instead of using a comment, I used the answer to try", "site with academic research tools (it was a tool to discover the network", "the network of existing connections with a specific academic text), but my answer", "\"culture\" of answering on the comments, that is somehow common for people censor", "the moderation could be double-checked?) or do feedback to the user migrate the", "answer to try to contribute a question. I advised a site with academic", "the answers that may be posted in comments? If that's the case, why", "try to contribute a question. I advised a site with academic research tools", "to a comment? Sorry, it is just a specific case that was happened", "as website marketing! I tried to use the edit to see if I", "that's the case, why people don't do a double check (Besides that how", "Instead of using a comment, I used the answer to try to contribute", "comments? If that's the case, why people don't do a double check (Besides", "be double-checked?) or do feedback to the user migrate the answer to the", "was quickly denounced and my contribution was seen as website marketing! I tried", "the answers and comments. So why regulators censor answers that could be comments?", "What I mean is: Instead of using a comment, I used the answer", "am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very close to what I am", "my answer was quickly denounced and my contribution was seen as website marketing!", "So why regulators censor answers that could be comments? Why don't ask to", "another \"no written regulation\" on the community. Wich is very difficult for new", "comments? Why don't ask to migrate the answer to a comment? Sorry, it", "answering on the comments, that is somehow common for people censor the answers", "could be double-checked?) or do feedback to the user migrate the answer to", "my replica. But the answer disappeared and I didn't have or couldn't find", "to go further because I don't get how the community uses the answers", "the community. Wich is very difficult for new members like me to get", "tried to use the edit to see if I received feedback from my", "Sorry, it is just a specific case that was happened to me. But", "migrate the answer to the comment? What I mean is: Instead of using", "which is very close to what I am saying here. But I want", "\"no written regulation\" on the community. Wich is very difficult for new members", "to answer the questions? I am already read [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1819/answers-in-comments) question, which is very", "the edit to see if I received feedback from my replica. But the", "academic text), but my answer was quickly denounced and my contribution was seen" ]
[ "this SE site. However, when I saw that there were tags for both", "2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today. To be", "academic life. Anyone who works in academia has probably had the experience of", "paper they later want to cite, or misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's", "off-topic today. To be honest, I hesitated before posting it because it felt", "or misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler", "not quite like an exact fit for this SE site. However, when I", "exact fit for this SE site. However, when I saw that there were", "ahead with the post. Let's face it, managing references is an indisputable part", "really off-topic to ask for advice on how to manage this, or to", "or to see if anybody else has been in a similar situation and", "it really off-topic to ask for advice on how to manage this, or", "([Any way to sync my Papers 2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was", "reassured, and went ahead with the post. Let's face it, managing references is", "of the job and an information-management problem for which a number of technological", "saw it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of Widgets,", "has probably had the experience of misplacing a research paper they later want", "misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in", "it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem", "the job and an information-management problem for which a number of technological solutions", "for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and went ahead with the", "my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today. To be honest, I hesitated", "method that worked well until recently, but now seems to be reaching its", "site. However, when I saw that there were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and", "Solving this problem is both part of the job and an information-management problem", "My situation is that I had a method that worked well until recently,", "problem for which a number of technological solutions are available, each with their", "references is an indisputable part of academic life. Anyone who works in academia", "part of academic life. Anyone who works in academia has probably had the", "to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today. To be honest, I", "et al in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is both part", "off-topic to ask for advice on how to manage this, or to see", "iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today. To be honest, I hesitated before posting", "in academia has probably had the experience of misplacing a research paper they", "SE site. However, when I saw that there were tags for both `[reference-managers]`", "problem is both part of the job and an information-management problem for which", "as off-topic today. To be honest, I hesitated before posting it because it", "`[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and went ahead with the post. Let's", "with the post. Let's face it, managing references is an indisputable part of", "to be reaching its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to ask for advice", "felt not quite like an exact fit for this SE site. However, when", "and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and went ahead with the post. Let's face", "is an indisputable part of academic life. Anyone who works in academia has", "quite like an exact fit for this SE site. However, when I saw", "I felt reassured, and went ahead with the post. Let's face it, managing", "I hesitated before posting it because it felt not quite like an exact", "information-management problem for which a number of technological solutions are available, each with", "and went ahead with the post. Let's face it, managing references is an", "Anyone who works in academia has probably had the experience of misplacing a", "to manage this, or to see if anybody else has been in a", "a method that worked well until recently, but now seems to be reaching", "research paper they later want to cite, or misremembering where they saw it", "later want to cite, or misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's see, was", "misplacing a research paper they later want to cite, or misremembering where they", "Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is both part of the job", "tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and went ahead with", "want to cite, or misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's see, was it", "end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to ask for advice on how to manage", "for which a number of technological solutions are available, each with their own", "works in academia has probably had the experience of misplacing a research paper", "had a method that worked well until recently, but now seems to be", "with their own advantages and disadvantages. My situation is that I had a", "felt reassured, and went ahead with the post. Let's face it, managing references", "its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to ask for advice on how to", "job and an information-management problem for which a number of technological solutions are", "library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today. To be honest,", "number of technological solutions are available, each with their own advantages and disadvantages.", "it because it felt not quite like an exact fit for this SE", "I had a method that worked well until recently, but now seems to", "seems to be reaching its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to ask for", "life. Anyone who works in academia has probably had the experience of misplacing", "Journal of Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals of", "and an information-management problem for which a number of technological solutions are available,", "their own advantages and disadvantages. My situation is that I had a method", "were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and went ahead", "that I had a method that worked well until recently, but now seems", "to cite, or misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein", "I saw that there were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt", "and disadvantages. My situation is that I had a method that worked well", "to ask for advice on how to manage this, or to see if", "solutions are available, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. My situation is", "question ([Any way to sync my Papers 2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad))", "see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or was it", "or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving", "Blovenstein et al in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is both", "in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is both part of the", "My question ([Any way to sync my Papers 2 library to my newer", "on how to manage this, or to see if anybody else has been", "before posting it because it felt not quite like an exact fit for", "for advice on how to manage this, or to see if anybody else", "who works in academia has probably had the experience of misplacing a research", "when I saw that there were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I", "Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals of Widget Research?\")", "a number of technological solutions are available, each with their own advantages and", "in Journal of Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals", "hesitated before posting it because it felt not quite like an exact fit", "both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and went ahead with the post.", "saw that there were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured,", "is that I had a method that worked well until recently, but now", "of Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals of Widget", "of academic life. Anyone who works in academia has probably had the experience", "that there were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and", "an exact fit for this SE site. However, when I saw that there", "al in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is both part of", "of misplacing a research paper they later want to cite, or misremembering where", "are available, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. My situation is that", "an indisputable part of academic life. Anyone who works in academia has probably", "they later want to cite, or misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's see,", "the post. Let's face it, managing references is an indisputable part of academic", "Let's face it, managing references is an indisputable part of academic life. Anyone", "Papers 2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today. To", "Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is both part of the job and an", "probably had the experience of misplacing a research paper they later want to", "Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is", "each with their own advantages and disadvantages. My situation is that I had", "was closed as off-topic today. To be honest, I hesitated before posting it", "that worked well until recently, but now seems to be reaching its end-of-life.", "Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et", "today. To be honest, I hesitated before posting it because it felt not", "it, managing references is an indisputable part of academic life. Anyone who works", "see if anybody else has been in a similar situation and found a", "ask for advice on how to manage this, or to see if anybody", "closed as off-topic today. To be honest, I hesitated before posting it because", "it felt not quite like an exact fit for this SE site. However,", "my Papers 2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today.", "However, when I saw that there were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]`", "of technological solutions are available, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. My", "managing references is an indisputable part of academic life. Anyone who works in", "for this SE site. However, when I saw that there were tags for", "disadvantages. My situation is that I had a method that worked well until", "Research?\") Solving this problem is both part of the job and an information-management", "recently, but now seems to be reaching its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic", "own advantages and disadvantages. My situation is that I had a method that", "how to manage this, or to see if anybody else has been in", "available, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. My situation is that I", "which a number of technological solutions are available, each with their own advantages", "advantages and disadvantages. My situation is that I had a method that worked", "& Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al", "sync my Papers 2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic", "they saw it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of", "to see if anybody else has been in a similar situation and found", "(\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or was", "honest, I hesitated before posting it because it felt not quite like an", "it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein", "of Widget Research?\") Solving this problem is both part of the job and", "face it, managing references is an indisputable part of academic life. Anyone who", "was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or was it Cobbler,", "there were tags for both `[reference-managers]` and `[technology]` I felt reassured, and went", "`[technology]` I felt reassured, and went ahead with the post. Let's face it,", "was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in Annals of Widget Research?\") Solving this", "part of the job and an information-management problem for which a number of", "it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or", "indisputable part of academic life. Anyone who works in academia has probably had", "where they saw it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein & Cobbler in Journal", "well until recently, but now seems to be reaching its end-of-life. Is it", "be reaching its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to ask for advice on", "like an exact fit for this SE site. However, when I saw that", "Is it really off-topic to ask for advice on how to manage this,", "post. Let's face it, managing references is an indisputable part of academic life.", "if anybody else has been in a similar situation and found a workable", "an information-management problem for which a number of technological solutions are available, each", "now seems to be reaching its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to ask", "fit for this SE site. However, when I saw that there were tags", "newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as off-topic today. To be honest, I hesitated before", "be honest, I hesitated before posting it because it felt not quite like", "cite, or misremembering where they saw it (\"Let's see, was it Blovenstein &", "worked well until recently, but now seems to be reaching its end-of-life. Is", "anybody else has been in a similar situation and found a workable solution?", "went ahead with the post. Let's face it, managing references is an indisputable", "a research paper they later want to cite, or misremembering where they saw", "is both part of the job and an information-management problem for which a", "both part of the job and an information-management problem for which a number", "until recently, but now seems to be reaching its end-of-life. Is it really", "advice on how to manage this, or to see if anybody else has", "but now seems to be reaching its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to", "because it felt not quite like an exact fit for this SE site.", "posting it because it felt not quite like an exact fit for this", "had the experience of misplacing a research paper they later want to cite,", "Cobbler in Journal of Widgets, or was it Cobbler, Blovenstein et al in", "way to sync my Papers 2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed", "manage this, or to see if anybody else has been in a similar", "To be honest, I hesitated before posting it because it felt not quite", "experience of misplacing a research paper they later want to cite, or misremembering", "situation is that I had a method that worked well until recently, but", "reaching its end-of-life. Is it really off-topic to ask for advice on how", "the experience of misplacing a research paper they later want to cite, or", "to sync my Papers 2 library to my newer iPad?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159027/any-way-to-sync-my-papers-2-library-to-my-newer-ipad)) was closed as", "technological solutions are available, each with their own advantages and disadvantages. My situation", "academia has probably had the experience of misplacing a research paper they later", "this, or to see if anybody else has been in a similar situation", "this problem is both part of the job and an information-management problem for" ]
[ "on academic matters, advice then becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters, more akin", "the day of the accusation, and essentially ask how the student can immediately", "a great deal of commonality in the advice given. Many of the questions", "question would be useful. I am open to editing the question (or my", "their innocence\". Advice often consists of telling the student to calm down and", "issue. To the extent that answers to these questions give advice that is", "form of misconduct. While the specifics of the allegations and circumstances differ, there", "[proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving general advice [presently closed]. Please", "be useful. I am open to editing the question (or my answer) if", "the accusation, and essentially ask how the student can immediately \"prove their innocence\".", "(i.e., which would not be replicated in a canonical version of the question),", "To the extent that answers to these questions give advice that is specific", "There are a number of questions on Academia.SE from students who have just", "circumstances differ, there is a great deal of commonality in the advice given.", "then becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice. *Here", "think this question adds value, and if any edits to the question would", "at issue. To the extent that answers to these questions give advice that", "material that relates to academia per se. Rather than focussing on academic matters,", "general advice [presently closed]. Please let me know if you think this question", "question), that is usually technical advice pertaining to a particular piece of evidence", "on the day of the accusation, and essentially ask how the student can", "here, irrespective of the particular allegation at issue. To the extent that answers", "with a long answer giving general advice [presently closed]. Please let me know", "edits to the question would be useful. I am open to editing the", "this question adds value, and if any edits to the question would be", "the procedure for allegations of misconduct. There is a great deal of valid", "these questions give advice that is specific to the situation (i.e., which would", "(e.g., how a particular computer system works) and arguably this is not material", "answer giving general advice [presently closed]. Please let me know if you think", "just been accused of cheating, or of some other form of misconduct. While", "specific to the situation (i.e., which would not be replicated in a canonical", "it would lead to acceptance as a canonical version of this class of", "the question), that is usually technical advice pertaining to a particular piece of", "extent that answers to these questions give advice that is specific to the", "and follow the procedure for allegations of misconduct. There is a great deal", "se. Rather than focussing on academic matters, advice then becomes technical advice on", "in a canonical version of the question), that is usually technical advice pertaining", "more akin to legal/forensic advice. Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a", "closed]. Please let me know if you think this question adds value, and", "give advice that is specific to the situation (i.e., which would not be", "my answer) if it would lead to acceptance as a canonical version of", "to a particular piece of evidence (e.g., how a particular computer system works)", "of misconduct. There is a great deal of valid general advice that can", "a particular computer system works) and arguably this is not material that relates", "becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice. Here is", "of some other form of misconduct. While the specifics of the allegations and", "written in a panic on the day of the accusation, and essentially ask", "replicated in a canonical version of the question), that is usually technical advice", "who have just been accused of cheating, or of some other form of", "particular piece of evidence (e.g., how a particular computer system works) and arguably", "not material that relates to academia per se. Rather than focussing on academic", "the questions are written in a panic on the day of the accusation,", "While the specifics of the allegations and circumstances differ, there is a great", "open to editing the question (or my answer) if it would lead to", "question (or my answer) if it would lead to acceptance as a canonical", "advice that is specific to the situation (i.e., which would not be replicated", "accused of cheating, or of some other form of misconduct. While the specifics", "me know if you think this question adds value, and if any edits", "and circumstances differ, there is a great deal of commonality in the advice", "immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists of telling the student to calm", "telling the student to calm down and follow the procedure for allegations of", "advice [presently closed]. Please let me know if you think this question adds", "allegation at issue. To the extent that answers to these questions give advice", "of the question), that is usually technical advice pertaining to a particular piece", "useful. I am open to editing the question (or my answer) if it", "the advice given. Many of the questions are written in a panic on", "that is specific to the situation (i.e., which would not be replicated in", "accusation, and essentially ask how the student can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice", "matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice. Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with", "ask how the student can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists of", "down and follow the procedure for allegations of misconduct. There is a great", "advice that can be given here, irrespective of the particular allegation at issue.", "specifics of the allegations and circumstances differ, there is a great deal of", "which would not be replicated in a canonical version of the question), that", "to the situation (i.e., which would not be replicated in a canonical version", "follow the procedure for allegations of misconduct. There is a great deal of", "are a number of questions on Academia.SE from students who have just been", "the extent that answers to these questions give advice that is specific to", "advice then becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice.", "of commonality in the advice given. Many of the questions are written in", "to editing the question (or my answer) if it would lead to acceptance", "legal/forensic advice. Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving", "be given here, irrespective of the particular allegation at issue. To the extent", "a canonical version of the question), that is usually technical advice pertaining to", "are written in a panic on the day of the accusation, and essentially", "of the allegations and circumstances differ, there is a great deal of commonality", "there is a great deal of commonality in the advice given. Many of", "number of questions on Academia.SE from students who have just been accused of", "students who have just been accused of cheating, or of some other form", "be replicated in a canonical version of the question), that is usually technical", "of the particular allegation at issue. To the extent that answers to these", "computer system works) and arguably this is not material that relates to academia", "if any edits to the question would be useful. I am open to", "innocence\". Advice often consists of telling the student to calm down and follow", "focussing on academic matters, advice then becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters, more", "advice pertaining to a particular piece of evidence (e.g., how a particular computer", "you think this question adds value, and if any edits to the question", "particular computer system works) and arguably this is not material that relates to", "know if you think this question adds value, and if any edits to", "on Academia.SE from students who have just been accused of cheating, or of", "often consists of telling the student to calm down and follow the procedure", "to calm down and follow the procedure for allegations of misconduct. There is", "question adds value, and if any edits to the question would be useful.", "is usually technical advice pertaining to a particular piece of evidence (e.g., how", "not be replicated in a canonical version of the question), that is usually", "misconduct. While the specifics of the allegations and circumstances differ, there is a", "Rather than focussing on academic matters, advice then becomes technical advice on evidentiary", "particular allegation at issue. To the extent that answers to these questions give", "of the questions are written in a panic on the day of the", "given. Many of the questions are written in a panic on the day", "Advice often consists of telling the student to calm down and follow the", "situation (i.e., which would not be replicated in a canonical version of the", "of the accusation, and essentially ask how the student can immediately \"prove their", "is not material that relates to academia per se. Rather than focussing on", "Please let me know if you think this question adds value, and if", "am open to editing the question (or my answer) if it would lead", "piece of evidence (e.g., how a particular computer system works) and arguably this", "(or my answer) if it would lead to acceptance as a canonical version", "giving general advice [presently closed]. Please let me know if you think this", "questions on Academia.SE from students who have just been accused of cheating, or", "advice on evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice. *Here is the [proposed", "the particular allegation at issue. To the extent that answers to these questions", "any edits to the question would be useful. I am open to editing", "system works) and arguably this is not material that relates to academia per", "that relates to academia per se. Rather than focussing on academic matters, advice", "to legal/forensic advice. Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer", "student can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists of telling the student", "technical advice on evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice. Here is the", "\"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists of telling the student to calm down", "general advice that can be given here, irrespective of the particular allegation at", "evidence (e.g., how a particular computer system works) and arguably this is not", "would not be replicated in a canonical version of the question), that is", "is specific to the situation (i.e., which would not be replicated in a", "the question would be useful. I am open to editing the question (or", "can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists of telling the student to", "canonical version of the question), that is usually technical advice pertaining to a", "a particular piece of evidence (e.g., how a particular computer system works) and", "of telling the student to calm down and follow the procedure for allegations", "of questions on Academia.SE from students who have just been accused of cheating,", "answer) if it would lead to acceptance as a canonical version of this", "is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving general advice [presently", "the situation (i.e., which would not be replicated in a canonical version of", "and if any edits to the question would be useful. I am open", "than focussing on academic matters, advice then becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters,", "in a panic on the day of the accusation, and essentially ask how", "some other form of misconduct. While the specifics of the allegations and circumstances", "advice given. Many of the questions are written in a panic on the", "works) and arguably this is not material that relates to academia per se.", "the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving general advice [presently closed].", "a panic on the day of the accusation, and essentially ask how the", "answers to these questions give advice that is specific to the situation (i.e.,", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving general advice [presently closed]. Please let me", "can be given here, irrespective of the particular allegation at issue. To the", "akin to legal/forensic advice. Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long", "a number of questions on Academia.SE from students who have just been accused", "advice. Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving general", "There is a great deal of valid general advice that can be given", "and arguably this is not material that relates to academia per se. Rather", "a great deal of valid general advice that can be given here, irrespective", "on evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice. *Here is the [proposed canonical", "valid general advice that can be given here, irrespective of the particular allegation", "procedure for allegations of misconduct. There is a great deal of valid general", "great deal of valid general advice that can be given here, irrespective of", "been accused of cheating, or of some other form of misconduct. While the", "would be useful. I am open to editing the question (or my answer)", "and essentially ask how the student can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often", "academia per se. Rather than focussing on academic matters, advice then becomes technical", "panic on the day of the accusation, and essentially ask how the student", "per se. Rather than focussing on academic matters, advice then becomes technical advice", "how the student can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists of telling", "given here, irrespective of the particular allegation at issue. To the extent that", "is a great deal of valid general advice that can be given here,", "irrespective of the particular allegation at issue. To the extent that answers to", "that is usually technical advice pertaining to a particular piece of evidence (e.g.,", "the allegations and circumstances differ, there is a great deal of commonality in", "long answer giving general advice [presently closed]. Please let me know if you", "allegations and circumstances differ, there is a great deal of commonality in the", "technical advice pertaining to a particular piece of evidence (e.g., how a particular", "the question (or my answer) if it would lead to acceptance as a", "allegations of misconduct. There is a great deal of valid general advice that", "academic matters, advice then becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters, more akin to", "value, and if any edits to the question would be useful. I am", "of cheating, or of some other form of misconduct. While the specifics of", "misconduct. There is a great deal of valid general advice that can be", "if it would lead to acceptance as a canonical version of this class", "arguably this is not material that relates to academia per se. Rather than", "or of some other form of misconduct. While the specifics of the allegations", "I am open to editing the question (or my answer) if it would", "Academia.SE from students who have just been accused of cheating, or of some", "calm down and follow the procedure for allegations of misconduct. There is a", "if you think this question adds value, and if any edits to the", "to the question would be useful. I am open to editing the question", "let me know if you think this question adds value, and if any", "of misconduct. While the specifics of the allegations and circumstances differ, there is", "is a great deal of commonality in the advice given. Many of the", "in the advice given. Many of the questions are written in a panic", "questions are written in a panic on the day of the accusation, and", "great deal of commonality in the advice given. Many of the questions are", "other form of misconduct. While the specifics of the allegations and circumstances differ,", "deal of commonality in the advice given. Many of the questions are written", "canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving general advice [presently closed]. Please let", "day of the accusation, and essentially ask how the student can immediately \"prove", "a long answer giving general advice [presently closed]. Please let me know if", "editing the question (or my answer) if it would lead to acceptance as", "of valid general advice that can be given here, irrespective of the particular", "consists of telling the student to calm down and follow the procedure for", "student to calm down and follow the procedure for allegations of misconduct. There", "to these questions give advice that is specific to the situation (i.e., which", "matters, advice then becomes technical advice on evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic", "adds value, and if any edits to the question would be useful. I", "have just been accused of cheating, or of some other form of misconduct.", "that answers to these questions give advice that is specific to the situation", "from students who have just been accused of cheating, or of some other", "Many of the questions are written in a panic on the day of", "the specifics of the allegations and circumstances differ, there is a great deal", "of evidence (e.g., how a particular computer system works) and arguably this is", "how a particular computer system works) and arguably this is not material that", "differ, there is a great deal of commonality in the advice given. Many", "the student to calm down and follow the procedure for allegations of misconduct.", "this is not material that relates to academia per se. Rather than focussing", "pertaining to a particular piece of evidence (e.g., how a particular computer system", "commonality in the advice given. Many of the questions are written in a", "the student can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists of telling the", "deal of valid general advice that can be given here, irrespective of the", "relates to academia per se. Rather than focussing on academic matters, advice then", "usually technical advice pertaining to a particular piece of evidence (e.g., how a", "that can be given here, irrespective of the particular allegation at issue. To", "[presently closed]. Please let me know if you think this question adds value,", "questions give advice that is specific to the situation (i.e., which would not", "Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/) with a long answer giving general advice", "evidentiary matters, more akin to legal/forensic advice. Here is the [proposed canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/159148/)", "version of the question), that is usually technical advice pertaining to a particular", "cheating, or of some other form of misconduct. While the specifics of the", "would lead to acceptance as a canonical version of this class of question.", "for allegations of misconduct. There is a great deal of valid general advice", "to academia per se*. Rather than focussing on academic matters, advice then becomes", "essentially ask how the student can immediately \"prove their innocence\". Advice often consists" ]
[ "+5 net score, and earns twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be", "and the consensus was roughly: > > profanity should be edited out of", "This was correctly flagged and edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according to the", "no answer containing a clear policy recommendation reaches this threshold, we will keep", "impossible, the answer should be deleted. > > > Recently, there was a", "policy, along with the rationale. Any answer that contains a clear policy suggestion,", "earns at least a +5 net score, and earns twice as many upvotes", "containing a clear policy recommendation reaches this threshold, we will keep our policy", "suggest that replies to this question should include a suggested update to our", "StackExchange generally [requires](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) professional, respectful discourse. As such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide.", "if impossible, the answer should be deleted. > > > Recently, there was", "answer contained an anecdote in which the following line was added to a", "[requires](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) professional, respectful discourse. As such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this", "correctly flagged and edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according to the existing policy,", "non-abusive and germane to the topic under discussion? If so, what restrictions (if", "earns twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be adopted. If no answer", "in a name!!` This was correctly flagged and edited (to remove the \"f-word\")", "To make this answerable, I strongly suggest that replies to this question should", "in which the following line was added to a codebase: `# For fuck's", "Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus was", "should be edited out of answers; if impossible, the answer should be deleted.", "to this question should include a suggested update to our policy, along with", "that contains a clear policy suggestion, does not conflict with a higher-voted answer,", "allow profanity when non-abusive and germane to the topic under discussion? If so,", "and germane to the topic under discussion? If so, what restrictions (if any)", "example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be spelled out in full when they", "was roughly: > > profanity should be edited out of answers; if impossible,", "Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus was roughly: >", "[here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be spelled out in full", "this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus was roughly: > > profanity should be", "the following line was added to a codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop", "germane to the topic under discussion? If so, what restrictions (if any) should", "score, and earns twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be adopted. If", "our policy, along with the rationale. Any answer that contains a clear policy", "they are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014,", "at least a +5 net score, and earns twice as many upvotes as", "If so, what restrictions (if any) should there be on this? To make", "If no answer containing a clear policy recommendation reaches this threshold, we will", "the topic under discussion? If so, what restrictions (if any) should there be", "being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the", "relaxed. So: should we allow profanity when non-abusive and germane to the topic", "codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop using anal as a variable or in", "should be relaxed. So: should we allow profanity when non-abusive and germane to", "should there be on this? To make this answerable, I strongly suggest that", "to a codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop using anal as a variable", "there be on this? To make this answerable, I strongly suggest that replies", "2014, and the consensus was roughly: > > profanity should be edited out", "Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an anecdote in which", "make this answerable, I strongly suggest that replies to this question should include", "a clear policy recommendation reaches this threshold, we will keep our policy unchanged.", "was too strict and should be relaxed. So: should we allow profanity when", "profanity should be edited out of answers; if impossible, the answer should be", "Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be spelled out in full when they are", "edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according to the existing policy, but some users", "[discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus was roughly: > > profanity should", "according to the existing policy, but some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that", "words be spelled out in full when they are being discussed. Here on", "be deleted. > > > Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer", "the \"f-word\") according to the existing policy, but some users (not unreasonably, IMO)", "and edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according to the existing policy, but some", "that \"profane\" words be spelled out in full when they are being discussed.", "users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy was too strict and should", "profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied differently on different sites:", "added to a codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop using anal as a", "(to remove the \"f-word\") according to the existing policy, but some users (not", "an answer contained an anecdote in which the following line was added to", "following line was added to a codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop using", "out in full when they are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last", "a codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop using anal as a variable or", "using anal as a variable or in a name!!` This was correctly flagged", "different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be", "and earns twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be adopted. If no", "not conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns at least a +5 net score,", "a higher-voted answer, earns at least a +5 net score, and earns twice", "to the topic under discussion? If so, what restrictions (if any) should there", "does not conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns at least a +5 net", "adopted. If no answer containing a clear policy recommendation reaches this threshold, we", "such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied differently on different", "be adopted. If no answer containing a clear policy recommendation reaches this threshold,", "disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied differently on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted),", "question should include a suggested update to our policy, along with the rationale.", "stop using anal as a variable or in a name!!` This was correctly", "anecdote in which the following line was added to a codebase: `# For", "along with the rationale. Any answer that contains a clear policy suggestion, does", "be on this? To make this answerable, I strongly suggest that replies to", "a +5 net score, and earns twice as many upvotes as downvotes will", "higher-voted answer, earns at least a +5 net score, and earns twice as", "> profanity should be edited out of answers; if impossible, the answer should", "under discussion? If so, what restrictions (if any) should there be on this?", "answer should be deleted. > > > Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when", "be spelled out in full when they are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE,", "the consensus was roughly: > > profanity should be edited out of answers;", "flagged and edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according to the existing policy, but", "policy was too strict and should be relaxed. So: should we allow profanity", "on this? To make this answerable, I strongly suggest that replies to this", "clear policy suggestion, does not conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns at least", "policy, but some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy was too", "strongly suggest that replies to this question should include a suggested update to", "there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an anecdote in which the", "update to our policy, along with the rationale. Any answer that contains a", "\"profane\" words be spelled out in full when they are being discussed. Here", "too strict and should be relaxed. So: should we allow profanity when non-abusive", "was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an anecdote in which the following", "as many upvotes as downvotes will be adopted. If no answer containing a", "conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns at least a +5 net score, and", "a clear policy suggestion, does not conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns at", "As such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied differently on", "is applied differently on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires", "a name!!` This was correctly flagged and edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according", "what restrictions (if any) should there be on this? To make this answerable,", "out of answers; if impossible, the answer should be deleted. > > >", "Any answer that contains a clear policy suggestion, does not conflict with a", "the answer should be deleted. > > > Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875)", "on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus was roughly:", "restrictions (if any) should there be on this? To make this answerable, I", "[kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an anecdote in which the following line was", "some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy was too strict and", "discussion? If so, what restrictions (if any) should there be on this? To", "But, this is applied differently on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example,", "an anecdote in which the following line was added to a codebase: `#", "suggestion, does not conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns at least a +5", "professional, respectful discourse. As such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is", "generally [requires](https://academia.stackexchange.com/conduct) professional, respectful discourse. As such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But,", "was added to a codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop using anal as", "when an answer contained an anecdote in which the following line was added", "a suggested update to our policy, along with the rationale. Any answer that", "answer that contains a clear policy suggestion, does not conflict with a higher-voted", "discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus", "profanity when non-abusive and germane to the topic under discussion? If so, what", "are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and", "in 2014, and the consensus was roughly: > > profanity should be edited", "we allow profanity when non-abusive and germane to the topic under discussion? If", "twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be adopted. If no answer containing", "[generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied differently on different sites: as noted", "should include a suggested update to our policy, along with the rationale. Any", "this question should include a suggested update to our policy, along with the", "include a suggested update to our policy, along with the rationale. Any answer", "contains a clear policy suggestion, does not conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns", "fuck's sake, stop using anal as a variable or in a name!!` This", "line was added to a codebase: `# For fuck's sake, stop using anal", "many upvotes as downvotes will be adopted. If no answer containing a clear", "respectful discourse. As such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied", "sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be spelled", "I strongly suggest that replies to this question should include a suggested update", "replies to this question should include a suggested update to our policy, along", "was correctly flagged and edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according to the existing", "is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied differently on different sites: as", "existing policy, but some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy was", "this answerable, I strongly suggest that replies to this question should include a", "> Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an anecdote in", "for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be spelled out in full when", "site-wide. But, this is applied differently on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for", "this is applied differently on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE", "will be adopted. If no answer containing a clear policy recommendation reaches this", "deleted. > > > Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained", "felt that our policy was too strict and should be relaxed. So: should", "on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words", "when they are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in", "a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an anecdote in which the following line", "that our policy was too strict and should be relaxed. So: should we", "our policy was too strict and should be relaxed. So: should we allow", "but some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy was too strict", "should we allow profanity when non-abusive and germane to the topic under discussion?", "a variable or in a name!!` This was correctly flagged and edited (to", "we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus was roughly: > >", "remove the \"f-word\") according to the existing policy, but some users (not unreasonably,", "this? To make this answerable, I strongly suggest that replies to this question", "noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be spelled out in", "topic under discussion? If so, what restrictions (if any) should there be on", "contained an anecdote in which the following line was added to a codebase:", "when non-abusive and germane to the topic under discussion? If so, what restrictions", "unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy was too strict and should be relaxed.", "answers; if impossible, the answer should be deleted. > > > Recently, there", "> > Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an anecdote", "as a variable or in a name!!` This was correctly flagged and edited", "net score, and earns twice as many upvotes as downvotes will be adopted.", "in full when they are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed", "requires that \"profane\" words be spelled out in full when they are being", "IMO) felt that our policy was too strict and should be relaxed. So:", "as downvotes will be adopted. If no answer containing a clear policy recommendation", "policy suggestion, does not conflict with a higher-voted answer, earns at least a", "consensus was roughly: > > profanity should be edited out of answers; if", "with a higher-voted answer, earns at least a +5 net score, and earns", "full when they are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164)", "to the existing policy, but some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our", "be relaxed. So: should we allow profanity when non-abusive and germane to the", "to our policy, along with the rationale. Any answer that contains a clear", "least a +5 net score, and earns twice as many upvotes as downvotes", "answer containing a clear policy recommendation reaches this threshold, we will keep our", "upvotes as downvotes will be adopted. If no answer containing a clear policy", "answer, earns at least a +5 net score, and earns twice as many", "So: should we allow profanity when non-abusive and germane to the topic under", "rationale. Any answer that contains a clear policy suggestion, does not conflict with", "last [discussed this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1160/what-does-the-offensive-flag-mean-to-you/1164) in 2014, and the consensus was roughly: > > profanity", "which the following line was added to a codebase: `# For fuck's sake,", "as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\" words be spelled out", "`# For fuck's sake, stop using anal as a variable or in a", "be edited out of answers; if impossible, the answer should be deleted. >", "strict and should be relaxed. So: should we allow profanity when non-abusive and", "name!!` This was correctly flagged and edited (to remove the \"f-word\") according to", "differently on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that \"profane\"", "the existing policy, but some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy", "answerable, I strongly suggest that replies to this question should include a suggested", "> > > Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an answer contained an", "that replies to this question should include a suggested update to our policy,", "and should be relaxed. So: should we allow profanity when non-abusive and germane", "For fuck's sake, stop using anal as a variable or in a name!!`", "anal as a variable or in a name!!` This was correctly flagged and", "discourse. As such, profanity is [generally disallowed](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22232/are-expletives-cursing-swear-words-or-vulgar-language-allowed-on-se-sites) site-wide. But, this is applied differently", "so, what restrictions (if any) should there be on this? To make this", "of answers; if impossible, the answer should be deleted. > > > Recently,", "downvotes will be adopted. If no answer containing a clear policy recommendation reaches", "any) should there be on this? To make this answerable, I strongly suggest", "or in a name!!` This was correctly flagged and edited (to remove the", "suggested update to our policy, along with the rationale. Any answer that contains", "with the rationale. Any answer that contains a clear policy suggestion, does not", "the rationale. Any answer that contains a clear policy suggestion, does not conflict", "(not unreasonably, IMO) felt that our policy was too strict and should be", "should be deleted. > > > Recently, there was a [kerfuffle](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160250/79875) when an", "sake, stop using anal as a variable or in a name!!` This was", "(if any) should there be on this? To make this answerable, I strongly", "applied differently on different sites: as noted [here](https://scifi.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2384/is-profanity-in-direct-quotes-from-source-material-permitted), for example, Literature.SE requires that", "roughly: > > profanity should be edited out of answers; if impossible, the", "variable or in a name!!` This was correctly flagged and edited (to remove", "> > profanity should be edited out of answers; if impossible, the answer", "\"f-word\") according to the existing policy, but some users (not unreasonably, IMO) felt", "edited out of answers; if impossible, the answer should be deleted. > >", "spelled out in full when they are being discussed. Here on Academia.SE, we" ]
[ "changes the answer considerably, though. I usually edit when there are typos, the", "- so my question is rather about making such large changes that remove", "I was reading an answer to a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited", "the edit and the edit made sense - so my question is rather", "oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes the answer considerably, though. I usually edit", "downvoted and flagged it. Was the edit OK by the rules? (the editor", "anything new (with or without the edit) so it should be just downvoted", "new (with or without the edit) so it should be just downvoted to", "(say, an exception to an otherwise good rule (in math for instance)). I", "and flagged it. Was the edit OK by the rules? (the editor explained", "so my question is rather about making such large changes that remove 80%", "add something minor to the answer because it is better (say, an exception", "The answer is very poor and does not bring anything new (with or", "what the author had in mind, I ask in comments before. In the", "answer, I would just have downvoted and flagged it. Was the edit OK", "very poor and does not bring anything new (with or without the edit)", "my question is rather about making such large changes that remove 80% of", "edit OK by the rules? (the editor explained clearly the reasons for the", "wrong, to break walls of text. The other case is when I add", "to an otherwise good rule (in math for instance)). I avoid making substantial", "clearly the reasons for the edit and the edit made sense - so", "a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to remove the religious aspects. The", "the edit made sense - so my question is rather about making such", "answer because it is better (say, an exception to an otherwise good rule", "links to references (without changing the reference), or add something minor to the", "exception to an otherwise good rule (in math for instance)). I avoid making", "editor explained clearly the reasons for the edit and the edit made sense", "otherwise good rule (in math for instance)). I avoid making substantial edits that", "avoid making substantial edits that change what the author had in mind, I", "the reference), or add something minor to the answer because it is better", "Was the edit OK by the rules? (the editor explained clearly the reasons", "change what the author had in mind, I ask in comments before. In", "by the rules? (the editor explained clearly the reasons for the edit and", "edits that change what the author had in mind, I ask in comments", "(without changing the reference), or add something minor to the answer because it", "just have downvoted and flagged it. Was the edit OK by the rules?", "to the answer because it is better (say, an exception to an otherwise", "considerably, though. I usually edit when there are typos, the formatting is wrong,", "in comments before. In the case of that specific answer, I would just", "remove the religious aspects. The answer is very poor and does not bring", "I add some links to references (without changing the reference), or add something", "the answer because it is better (say, an exception to an otherwise good", "bring anything new (with or without the edit) so it should be just", "case is when I add some links to references (without changing the reference),", "edit and the edit made sense - so my question is rather about", "when it got edited to remove the religious aspects. The answer is very", "just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes the answer considerably, though.", "not bring anything new (with or without the edit) so it should be", "the case of that specific answer, I would just have downvoted and flagged", "reference), or add something minor to the answer because it is better (say,", "when I add some links to references (without changing the reference), or add", "would just have downvoted and flagged it. Was the edit OK by the", "have downvoted and flagged it. Was the edit OK by the rules? (the", "because it is better (say, an exception to an otherwise good rule (in", "the rules? (the editor explained clearly the reasons for the edit and the", "is rather about making such large changes that remove 80% of the content)", "Removing the religious aspect changes the answer considerably, though. I usually edit when", "formatting is wrong, to break walls of text. The other case is when", "I avoid making substantial edits that change what the author had in mind,", "or add something minor to the answer because it is better (say, an", "the religious aspect changes the answer considerably, though. I usually edit when there", "aspects. The answer is very poor and does not bring anything new (with", "it is better (say, an exception to an otherwise good rule (in math", "made sense - so my question is rather about making such large changes", "changing the reference), or add something minor to the answer because it is", "other case is when I add some links to references (without changing the", "rules? (the editor explained clearly the reasons for the edit and the edit", "references (without changing the reference), or add something minor to the answer because", "is very poor and does not bring anything new (with or without the", "edit) so it should be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect", "it. Was the edit OK by the rules? (the editor explained clearly the", "religious aspect changes the answer considerably, though. I usually edit when there are", "the edit) so it should be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious", "that change what the author had in mind, I ask in comments before.", "specific answer, I would just have downvoted and flagged it. Was the edit", "the author had in mind, I ask in comments before. In the case", "the edit OK by the rules? (the editor explained clearly the reasons for", "reasons for the edit and the edit made sense - so my question", "and the edit made sense - so my question is rather about making", "The other case is when I add some links to references (without changing", "is when I add some links to references (without changing the reference), or", "break walls of text. The other case is when I add some links", "substantial edits that change what the author had in mind, I ask in", "in mind, I ask in comments before. In the case of that specific", "so it should be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes", "be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes the answer considerably,", "the reasons for the edit and the edit made sense - so my", "author had in mind, I ask in comments before. In the case of", "sense - so my question is rather about making such large changes that", "some links to references (without changing the reference), or add something minor to", "are typos, the formatting is wrong, to break walls of text. The other", "math for instance)). I avoid making substantial edits that change what the author", "question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to remove the religious aspects. The answer", "answer is very poor and does not bring anything new (with or without", "it should be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes the", "of that specific answer, I would just have downvoted and flagged it. Was", "the formatting is wrong, to break walls of text. The other case is", "minor to the answer because it is better (say, an exception to an", "had in mind, I ask in comments before. In the case of that", "usually edit when there are typos, the formatting is wrong, to break walls", "case of that specific answer, I would just have downvoted and flagged it.", "reading an answer to a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to remove", "explained clearly the reasons for the edit and the edit made sense -", "that specific answer, I would just have downvoted and flagged it. Was the", "edited to remove the religious aspects. The answer is very poor and does", "flagged it. Was the edit OK by the rules? (the editor explained clearly", "better (say, an exception to an otherwise good rule (in math for instance)).", "to remove the religious aspects. The answer is very poor and does not", "of text. The other case is when I add some links to references", "to references (without changing the reference), or add something minor to the answer", "(the editor explained clearly the reasons for the edit and the edit made", "making substantial edits that change what the author had in mind, I ask", "is wrong, to break walls of text. The other case is when I", "before. In the case of that specific answer, I would just have downvoted", "I usually edit when there are typos, the formatting is wrong, to break", "question is rather about making such large changes that remove 80% of the", "was reading an answer to a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to", "comments before. In the case of that specific answer, I would just have", "an otherwise good rule (in math for instance)). I avoid making substantial edits", "poor and does not bring anything new (with or without the edit) so", "to break walls of text. The other case is when I add some", "text. The other case is when I add some links to references (without", "I would just have downvoted and flagged it. Was the edit OK by", "does not bring anything new (with or without the edit) so it should", "to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes the answer considerably, though. I usually", "it got edited to remove the religious aspects. The answer is very poor", "good rule (in math for instance)). I avoid making substantial edits that change", "or without the edit) so it should be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing", "I ask in comments before. In the case of that specific answer, I", "for the edit and the edit made sense - so my question is", "typos, the formatting is wrong, to break walls of text. The other case", "instance)). I avoid making substantial edits that change what the author had in", "when there are typos, the formatting is wrong, to break walls of text.", "(in math for instance)). I avoid making substantial edits that change what the", "answer considerably, though. I usually edit when there are typos, the formatting is", "something minor to the answer because it is better (say, an exception to", "mind, I ask in comments before. In the case of that specific answer,", "for instance)). I avoid making substantial edits that change what the author had", "(with or without the edit) so it should be just downvoted to oblivion.", "an exception to an otherwise good rule (in math for instance)). I avoid", "religious aspects. The answer is very poor and does not bring anything new", "edit when there are typos, the formatting is wrong, to break walls of", "(<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to remove the religious aspects. The answer is", "the religious aspects. The answer is very poor and does not bring anything", "aspect changes the answer considerably, though. I usually edit when there are typos,", "OK by the rules? (the editor explained clearly the reasons for the edit", "walls of text. The other case is when I add some links to", "an answer to a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to remove the", "though. I usually edit when there are typos, the formatting is wrong, to", "to a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to remove the religious aspects.", "there are typos, the formatting is wrong, to break walls of text. The", "In the case of that specific answer, I would just have downvoted and", "without the edit) so it should be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the", "the answer considerably, though. I usually edit when there are typos, the formatting", "should be just downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes the answer", "ask in comments before. In the case of that specific answer, I would", "and does not bring anything new (with or without the edit) so it", "downvoted to oblivion. Removing the religious aspect changes the answer considerably, though. I", "rule (in math for instance)). I avoid making substantial edits that change what", "edit made sense - so my question is rather about making such large", "answer to a question (<https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/160520/15446>) when it got edited to remove the religious", "got edited to remove the religious aspects. The answer is very poor and", "is better (say, an exception to an otherwise good rule (in math for", "add some links to references (without changing the reference), or add something minor" ]
[ "And also wanted to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark", "anything, just created noise. People, then, closed the question, most likely out of", "closed the question, most likely out of spite. Is this childlike behaviour appropriate?", "is a simple, agreed upon, answer to the question. Yet, the question is", "Postdoc, in the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that", "question: [What is a good rule of thumb for the cost of a", "apparently there is a simple, agreed upon, answer to the question. Yet, the", "of a Postdoc, in the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment", "a Postdoc, in the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said", "this fact. So apparently there is a simple, agreed upon, answer to the", "closed. Why? Because the first comments (now deleted) wanted to know \"why I", "at this question: [What is a good rule of thumb for the cost", "The first comment said that it is apparently a well known fact that", "a ballpark estimate. And so on. Of course, I replied appropriately to these", "question. Yet, the question is closed. Why? Because the first comments (now deleted)", "comments which did not improve anything, just created noise. People, then, closed the", "thumb for the cost of a Postdoc, in the US at an R1", "cost of a Postdoc, in the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first", "that the ballpark estimate is to double the salary. The answer confirms this", "the first comments (now deleted) wanted to know \"why I was asking that.\"", "comments (now deleted) wanted to know \"why I was asking that.\" And also", "deleted) wanted to know \"why I was asking that.\" And also wanted to", "agreed upon, answer to the question. Yet, the question is closed. Why? Because", "apparently a well known fact that the ballpark estimate is to double the", "the question is closed. Why? Because the first comments (now deleted) wanted to", "noise. People, then, closed the question, most likely out of spite. Is this", "university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that it is apparently a well known fact", "People, then, closed the question, most likely out of spite. Is this childlike", "fact that the ballpark estimate is to double the salary. The answer confirms", "rule of thumb for the cost of a Postdoc, in the US at", "to know a ballpark estimate. And so on. Of course, I replied appropriately", "a simple, agreed upon, answer to the question. Yet, the question is closed.", "upon, answer to the question. Yet, the question is closed. Why? Because the", "the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that it is", "confirms this fact. So apparently there is a simple, agreed upon, answer to", "appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments which did not improve anything, just created", "\"why I was asking that.\" And also wanted to \"teach me\" that it's", "also wanted to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate.", "fact. So apparently there is a simple, agreed upon, answer to the question.", "know \"why I was asking that.\" And also wanted to \"teach me\" that", "patronizing comments which did not improve anything, just created noise. People, then, closed", "R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that it is apparently a well known", "to double the salary. The answer confirms this fact. So apparently there is", "(now deleted) wanted to know \"why I was asking that.\" And also wanted", "Of course, I replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments which did not", "take look at this question: [What is a good rule of thumb for", "me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate. And so on. Of", "wanted to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate. And", "the ballpark estimate is to double the salary. The answer confirms this fact.", "a good rule of thumb for the cost of a Postdoc, in the", "Yet, the question is closed. Why? Because the first comments (now deleted) wanted", "The answer confirms this fact. So apparently there is a simple, agreed upon,", "\"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate. And so on. Of course, I replied", "there is a simple, agreed upon, answer to the question. Yet, the question", "estimate. And so on. Of course, I replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing", "was asking that.\" And also wanted to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to", "asking that.\" And also wanted to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know", "on. Of course, I replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments which did", "then, closed the question, most likely out of spite. Is this childlike behaviour", "is to double the salary. The answer confirms this fact. So apparently there", "which did not improve anything, just created noise. People, then, closed the question,", "well known fact that the ballpark estimate is to double the salary. The", "Why? Because the first comments (now deleted) wanted to know \"why I was", "look at this question: [What is a good rule of thumb for the", "is apparently a well known fact that the ballpark estimate is to double", "question is closed. Why? Because the first comments (now deleted) wanted to know", "Please, take look at this question: [What is a good rule of thumb", "replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments which did not improve anything, just", "an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that it is apparently a well", "it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate. And so on. Of course, I", "of thumb for the cost of a Postdoc, in the US at an", "good rule of thumb for the cost of a Postdoc, in the US", "\"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate. And so on.", "not improve anything, just created noise. People, then, closed the question, most likely", "salary. The answer confirms this fact. So apparently there is a simple, agreed", "comment said that it is apparently a well known fact that the ballpark", "to the question. Yet, the question is closed. Why? Because the first comments", "answer to the question. Yet, the question is closed. Why? Because the first", "for the cost of a Postdoc, in the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive)", "in the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that it", "know a ballpark estimate. And so on. Of course, I replied appropriately to", "that it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate. And so on. Of course,", "US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that it is apparently", "so on. Of course, I replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments which", "ballpark estimate. And so on. Of course, I replied appropriately to these condescending,", "known fact that the ballpark estimate is to double the salary. The answer", "the cost of a Postdoc, in the US at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The", "I was asking that.\" And also wanted to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\"", "condescending, patronizing comments which did not improve anything, just created noise. People, then,", "to know \"why I was asking that.\" And also wanted to \"teach me\"", "I replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments which did not improve anything,", "first comment said that it is apparently a well known fact that the", "first comments (now deleted) wanted to know \"why I was asking that.\" And", "Because the first comments (now deleted) wanted to know \"why I was asking", "So apparently there is a simple, agreed upon, answer to the question. Yet,", "to these condescending, patronizing comments which did not improve anything, just created noise.", "improve anything, just created noise. People, then, closed the question, most likely out", "[What is a good rule of thumb for the cost of a Postdoc,", "to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know a ballpark estimate. And so", "said that it is apparently a well known fact that the ballpark estimate", "this question: [What is a good rule of thumb for the cost of", "these condescending, patronizing comments which did not improve anything, just created noise. People,", "is a good rule of thumb for the cost of a Postdoc, in", "course, I replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments which did not improve", "at an R1 university](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160653/what-is-a-good-rule-of-thumb-for-the-cost-of-a-postdoc-in-the-us-at-an-r1-unive) The first comment said that it is apparently a", "answer confirms this fact. So apparently there is a simple, agreed upon, answer", "simple, agreed upon, answer to the question. Yet, the question is closed. Why?", "it is apparently a well known fact that the ballpark estimate is to", "the question. Yet, the question is closed. Why? Because the first comments (now", "estimate is to double the salary. The answer confirms this fact. So apparently", "a well known fact that the ballpark estimate is to double the salary.", "did not improve anything, just created noise. People, then, closed the question, most", "is closed. Why? Because the first comments (now deleted) wanted to know \"why", "double the salary. The answer confirms this fact. So apparently there is a", "created noise. People, then, closed the question, most likely out of spite. Is", "that it is apparently a well known fact that the ballpark estimate is", "wanted to know \"why I was asking that.\" And also wanted to \"teach", "And so on. Of course, I replied appropriately to these condescending, patronizing comments", "the salary. The answer confirms this fact. So apparently there is a simple,", "ballpark estimate is to double the salary. The answer confirms this fact. So", "that.\" And also wanted to \"teach me\" that it's \"worthless\" to know a", "just created noise. People, then, closed the question, most likely out of spite." ]
[ "i.e. different technologies and innovations are > conceived to be interlinked in a", "management and if yes what is the > proper term for that (given", "not exactly but comparable) in reality\\* in terms of research and technology management", "maybe Philosophy either English SE are better places than Academia? My question: >", "better to ask this, maybe Philosophy either English SE are better places than", "are > conceived to be interlinked in a graph. > > > Is", "what is the > proper term for that (given that the \"TechTree\" term", "> From computer games like Civilizations, we know the concept of the >", "the \"TechTree\" term is specific to games? > > > \\* Besides the", "and technology management and if yes what is the > proper term for", "and innovations are > conceived to be interlinked in a graph. > >", "SE are better places than Academia? My question: > > From computer games", "but comparable) in reality\\* in terms of research and technology management and if", "concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations are >", "From computer games like Civilizations, we know the concept of the > [technology", "> [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations are > conceived to be", "interlinked in a graph. > > > Is there actually such a thing", "innovations are > conceived to be interlinked in a graph. > > >", "yes what is the > proper term for that (given that the \"TechTree\"", "for that (given that the \"TechTree\" term is specific to games? > >", "ask this, maybe Philosophy either English SE are better places than Academia? My", "places than Academia? My question: > > From computer games like Civilizations, we", "> > From computer games like Civilizations, we know the concept of the", "where better to ask this, maybe Philosophy either English SE are better places", "> Is there actually such a thing (maybe not exactly but comparable) in", "such a thing (maybe not exactly but comparable) in reality\\* in terms of", "is specific to games? > > > \\* Besides the paper citation graph", "term is specific to games? > > > \\* Besides the paper citation", "graph. > > > Is there actually such a thing (maybe not exactly", "exactly but comparable) in reality\\* in terms of research and technology management and", "Is there actually such a thing (maybe not exactly but comparable) in reality\\", "the concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations are", "terms of research and technology management and if yes what is the >", "term for that (given that the \"TechTree\" term is specific to games? >", "like Civilizations, we know the concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different", "games like Civilizations, we know the concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e.", "a thing (maybe not exactly but comparable) in reality\\ in terms of research", "> conceived to be interlinked in a graph. > > > Is there", "comparable) in reality\\* in terms of research and technology management and if yes", "of research and technology management and if yes what is the > proper", "reality\\* in terms of research and technology management and if yes what is", "be interlinked in a graph. > > > Is there actually such a", "better places than Academia? My question: > > From computer games like Civilizations,", "Civilizations, we know the concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies", "technologies and innovations are > conceived to be interlinked in a graph. >", "(maybe not exactly but comparable) in reality\\* in terms of research and technology", "in a graph. > > > Is there actually such a thing (maybe", "research and technology management and if yes what is the > proper term", "tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations are > conceived to be interlinked in", "I'm not sure where better to ask this, maybe Philosophy either English SE", "(given that the \"TechTree\" term is specific to games? > > > \\", "there actually such a thing (maybe not exactly but comparable) in reality\\ in", "not sure where better to ask this, maybe Philosophy either English SE are", "Philosophy either English SE are better places than Academia? My question: > >", "technology management and if yes what is the > proper term for that", "My question: > > From computer games like Civilizations, we know the concept", "to be interlinked in a graph. > > > Is there actually such", "English SE are better places than Academia? My question: > > From computer", "is the > proper term for that (given that the \"TechTree\" term is", "this, maybe Philosophy either English SE are better places than Academia? My question:", "know the concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations", "> > Is there actually such a thing (maybe not exactly but comparable)", "sure where better to ask this, maybe Philosophy either English SE are better", "in reality\\* in terms of research and technology management and if yes what", "the > proper term for that (given that the \"TechTree\" term is specific", "Academia? My question: > > From computer games like Civilizations, we know the", "that (given that the \"TechTree\" term is specific to games? > > >", "to ask this, maybe Philosophy either English SE are better places than Academia?", "in terms of research and technology management and if yes what is the", "are better places than Academia? My question: > > From computer games like", "than Academia? My question: > > From computer games like Civilizations, we know", "conceived to be interlinked in a graph. > > > Is there actually", "and if yes what is the > proper term for that (given that", "either English SE are better places than Academia? My question: > > From", "if yes what is the > proper term for that (given that the", "question: > > From computer games like Civilizations, we know the concept of", "[technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations are > conceived to be interlinked", "> proper term for that (given that the \"TechTree\" term is specific to", "a graph. > > > Is there actually such a thing (maybe not", "actually such a thing (maybe not exactly but comparable) in reality\\* in terms", "computer games like Civilizations, we know the concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree),", "we know the concept of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and", "different technologies and innovations are > conceived to be interlinked in a graph.", "that the \"TechTree\" term is specific to games? > > > \\* Besides", "proper term for that (given that the \"TechTree\" term is specific to games?", "\"TechTree\" term is specific to games? > > > \\* Besides the paper", "of the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations are > conceived", "the > [technology tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_tree), i.e. different technologies and innovations are > conceived to", "> > > Is there actually such a thing (maybe not exactly but", "thing (maybe not exactly but comparable) in reality\\* in terms of research and" ]
[ "as off-topic. The only reason I can think of is that the question", "as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the academic ecosystem nowadays,", "question, if possible. For what it's worth, I think that there is clear", "Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The only reason I can think", "rewrite the question, if possible. For what it's worth, I think that there", "I think that there is clear evidence that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566)", "order to get a chance to rewrite the question, if possible. For what", "For what it's worth, I think that there is clear evidence that sites", "think of is that the question is about a non-academic site. I would", "reason I can think of is that the question is about a non-academic", "the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see why questions related to these", "in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see why questions related to", "don't see why questions related to these non-academic sites would be off-topic on", "closed as off-topic. The only reason I can think of is that the", "a non-academic site. I would like to understand in order to get a", "of is that the question is about a non-academic site. I would like", "chance to rewrite the question, if possible. For what it's worth, I think", "see why questions related to these non-academic sites would be off-topic on AcademiaSE.", "such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the academic ecosystem", "about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The only reason I can", "I would like to understand in order to get a chance to rewrite", "only reason I can think of is that the question is about a", "I don't understand why [my question about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as", "play a role in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see why", "knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The only reason I can think of", "question is about a non-academic site. I would like to understand in order", "panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The only reason I can think of is", "[Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so", "can think of is that the question is about a non-academic site. I", "is that the question is about a non-academic site. I would like to", "[my question about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The only reason", "that the question is about a non-academic site. I would like to understand", "a chance to rewrite the question, if possible. For what it's worth, I", "worth, I think that there is clear evidence that sites such as [Google", "so I don't see why questions related to these non-academic sites would be", "understand why [my question about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The", "is about a non-academic site. I would like to understand in order to", "understand in order to get a chance to rewrite the question, if possible.", "what it's worth, I think that there is clear evidence that sites such", "academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see why questions related to these non-academic", "sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the academic", "the question is about a non-academic site. I would like to understand in", "evidence that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in", "if possible. For what it's worth, I think that there is clear evidence", "that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the", "role in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see why questions related", "I don't see why questions related to these non-academic sites would be off-topic", "is clear evidence that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a", "The only reason I can think of is that the question is about", "like to understand in order to get a chance to rewrite the question,", "question about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The only reason I", "get a chance to rewrite the question, if possible. For what it's worth,", "clear evidence that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role", "ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see why questions related to these non-academic sites", "in order to get a chance to rewrite the question, if possible. For", "to get a chance to rewrite the question, if possible. For what it's", "or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't", "why [my question about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic. The only", "the question, if possible. For what it's worth, I think that there is", "site. I would like to understand in order to get a chance to", "don't understand why [my question about Google knowledge panel](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/162818/93566) was closed as off-topic.", "to rewrite the question, if possible. For what it's worth, I think that", "to understand in order to get a chance to rewrite the question, if", "would like to understand in order to get a chance to rewrite the", "off-topic. The only reason I can think of is that the question is", "I can think of is that the question is about a non-academic site.", "nowadays, so I don't see why questions related to these non-academic sites would", "possible. For what it's worth, I think that there is clear evidence that", "was closed as off-topic. The only reason I can think of is that", "a role in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see why questions", "[ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I don't see", "think that there is clear evidence that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or", "Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play a role in the academic ecosystem nowadays, so I", "it's worth, I think that there is clear evidence that sites such as", "that there is clear evidence that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566)", "non-academic site. I would like to understand in order to get a chance", "there is clear evidence that sites such as [Google Scholar](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/138009/93566) or [ResearchGate](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/47481/93566) play", "about a non-academic site. I would like to understand in order to get" ]
[ "opinion) be clear from the written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic", "in that they affect the entire exam. Is it on-topic for me to", "in nature (although, they are related to instructions about the use of the", "exam where, I believe, the instructions and questions were clearly flawed (to the", "the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are related to", "the instructions and questions are such that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical", "itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in nature, in that they affect the", "learning exam where, I believe, the instructions and questions were clearly flawed (to", "flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are related to instructions", "ask whether they are problematic or whether I am misunderstanding something on my", "mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are related to instructions about the use of", "whether I am misunderstanding something on my end? (This was an online exam,", "and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they", "post parts of the exam instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course)", "they are related to instructions about the use of the provided data), and", "(This was an online exam, so students are free to download the material.)", "of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are problematic or whether I", "my end? (This was an online exam, so students are free to download", "(although, they are related to instructions about the use of the provided data),", "I am misunderstanding something on my end? (This was an online exam, so", "the instructions and questions were clearly flawed (to the point of being logically", "they affect the entire exam. Is it on-topic for me to post parts", "problematic or whether I am misunderstanding something on my end? (This was an", "be clear from the written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in", "and they should (in my opinion) be clear from the written language itself.", "sat a statistical/machine learning exam where, I believe, the instructions and questions were", "nature, in that they affect the entire exam. Is it on-topic for me", "on-topic for me to post parts of the exam instructions and questions (with", "recently sat a statistical/machine learning exam where, I believe, the instructions and questions", "are such that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they", "parts of the exam instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on", "logically incoherent). The problems with the instructions and questions are such that the", "were clearly flawed (to the point of being logically incoherent). The problems with", "they are problematic or whether I am misunderstanding something on my end? (This", "are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are related to instructions about", "systemic in nature, in that they affect the entire exam. Is it on-topic", "problems with the instructions and questions are such that the flaws are not", "such that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are", "Is it on-topic for me to post parts of the exam instructions and", "The problems with the instructions and questions are such that the flaws are", "written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in nature, in that they", "use of the provided data), and they should (in my opinion) be clear", "provided data), and they should (in my opinion) be clear from the written", "misunderstanding something on my end? (This was an online exam, so students are", "for me to post parts of the exam instructions and questions (with accompanying", "Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in nature, in that they affect the entire", "the exam instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and", "the use of the provided data), and they should (in my opinion) be", "questions were clearly flawed (to the point of being logically incoherent). The problems", "my opinion) be clear from the written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are", "clearly flawed (to the point of being logically incoherent). The problems with the", "(to the point of being logically incoherent). The problems with the instructions and", "statistical/machine learning exam where, I believe, the instructions and questions were clearly flawed", "on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are problematic or whether I am misunderstanding", "and ask whether they are problematic or whether I am misunderstanding something on", "and questions were clearly flawed (to the point of being logically incoherent). The", "end? (This was an online exam, so students are free to download the", "(in my opinion) be clear from the written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws", "(with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are problematic", "I recently sat a statistical/machine learning exam where, I believe, the instructions and", "a statistical/machine learning exam where, I believe, the instructions and questions were clearly", "the entire exam. Is it on-topic for me to post parts of the", "context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are problematic or whether", "course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are problematic or whether I am", "language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in nature, in that they affect", "instructions about the use of the provided data), and they should (in my", "in nature, in that they affect the entire exam. Is it on-topic for", "related to instructions about the use of the provided data), and they should", "and questions are such that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature", "should (in my opinion) be clear from the written language itself. Furthermore, the", "it on-topic for me to post parts of the exam instructions and questions", "being logically incoherent). The problems with the instructions and questions are such that", "the flaws are systemic in nature, in that they affect the entire exam.", "the point of being logically incoherent). The problems with the instructions and questions", "to instructions about the use of the provided data), and they should (in", "me to post parts of the exam instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation,", "instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether", "entire exam. Is it on-topic for me to post parts of the exam", "that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are related", "on my end? (This was an online exam, so students are free to", "nature (although, they are related to instructions about the use of the provided", "with the instructions and questions are such that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally", "of the exam instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange", "accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are problematic or", "believe, the instructions and questions were clearly flawed (to the point of being", "questions are such that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although,", "of being logically incoherent). The problems with the instructions and questions are such", "whether they are problematic or whether I am misunderstanding something on my end?", "are problematic or whether I am misunderstanding something on my end? (This was", "questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are", "instructions and questions are such that the flaws are not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in", "heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are related to instructions about the use", "instructions and questions were clearly flawed (to the point of being logically incoherent).", "incoherent). The problems with the instructions and questions are such that the flaws", "of the provided data), and they should (in my opinion) be clear from", "about the use of the provided data), and they should (in my opinion)", "they should (in my opinion) be clear from the written language itself. Furthermore,", "I believe, the instructions and questions were clearly flawed (to the point of", "not heavily/fundamentally mathematical/statistical in nature (although, they are related to instructions about the", "affect the entire exam. Is it on-topic for me to post parts of", "data), and they should (in my opinion) be clear from the written language", "exam instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of course) on academia.stackexchange and ask", "the provided data), and they should (in my opinion) be clear from the", "from the written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in nature, in", "am misunderstanding something on my end? (This was an online exam, so students", "are systemic in nature, in that they affect the entire exam. Is it", "flaws are systemic in nature, in that they affect the entire exam. Is", "where, I believe, the instructions and questions were clearly flawed (to the point", "something on my end? (This was an online exam, so students are free", "academia.stackexchange and ask whether they are problematic or whether I am misunderstanding something", "point of being logically incoherent). The problems with the instructions and questions are", "clear from the written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in nature,", "exam. Is it on-topic for me to post parts of the exam instructions", "flawed (to the point of being logically incoherent). The problems with the instructions", "are related to instructions about the use of the provided data), and they", "to post parts of the exam instructions and questions (with accompanying context/explanation, of", "or whether I am misunderstanding something on my end? (This was an online", "that they affect the entire exam. Is it on-topic for me to post", "the written language itself. Furthermore, the flaws are systemic in nature, in that" ]
[ "are often very similar to each other. However, there aren't many publishers of", "of writing in spite of being closed. I wonder what others think about", "answer for small publishers, since there are so many of them and they", "writing in spite of being closed. I wonder what others think about this.", "many publishers of MDPI's size. They attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and", "are more facts about them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also", "Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown really big. It's roughly the", "of doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI", "so many of them and they are often very similar to each other.", "attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts about them available", "[How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as an answer for", "doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has", "was much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable that [How to identify predatory", "incredible considering that it was much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable that", "which is incredible considering that it was much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's", "small publishers, since there are so many of them and they are often", "publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts about them available (e.g. their [annual", "from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts about them available (e.g.", "them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close to 100k", "time of writing in spite of being closed. I wonder what others think", "many of them and they are often very similar to each other. However,", "since there are so many of them and they are often very similar", "a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown really big. It's", "report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close to 100k views as of time of", "of time of writing in spite of being closed. I wonder what others", "grown really big. It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall now, which is", "Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown really big. It's roughly the fifth biggest", "MDPI's size. They attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more", "so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown", "MDPI has grown really big. It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall now,", "similar to each other. However, there aren't many publishers of MDPI's size. They", "but I'm thinking of doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon", "there aren't many publishers of MDPI's size. They attract attention from other publishers", "the fifth biggest publisher overall now, which is incredible considering that it was", "other. However, there aren't many publishers of MDPI's size. They attract attention from", "considering that it was much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable that [How", "biggest publisher overall now, which is incredible considering that it was much smaller", "it was much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable that [How to identify", "for small publishers, since there are so many of them and they are", "that MDPI has grown really big. It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall", "works as an answer for small publishers, since there are so many of", "roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall now, which is incredible considering that it", "very similar to each other. However, there aren't many publishers of MDPI's size.", "100k views as of time of writing in spite of being closed. I", "available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close to 100k views", "publisher overall now, which is incredible considering that it was much smaller (~17th", "(the \"duplicate\" question) works as an answer for small publishers, since there are", "close to 100k views as of time of writing in spite of being", "there are so many of them and they are often very similar to", "I'm thinking of doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is", "of them and they are often very similar to each other. However, there", "thinking of doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that", "also has close to 100k views as of time of writing in spite", "to 100k views as of time of writing in spite of being closed.", "publishers of MDPI's size. They attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there", "fifth biggest publisher overall now, which is incredible considering that it was much", "there are more facts about them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question", "views as of time of writing in spite of being closed. I wonder", "as of time of writing in spite of being closed. I wonder what", "(~17th in 2015). It's arguable that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\"", "are so many of them and they are often very similar to each", "has close to 100k views as of time of writing in spite of", "publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as an answer for small publishers, since there", "now, which is incredible considering that it was much smaller (~17th in 2015).", "([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts about them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)).", "However, there aren't many publishers of MDPI's size. They attract attention from other", "each other. However, there aren't many publishers of MDPI's size. They attract attention", "facts about them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close", "is that MDPI has grown really big. It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher", "attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts about them", "It's arguable that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as", "their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close to 100k views as of", "smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the", "question also has close to 100k views as of time of writing in", "arguable that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as an", "The question also has close to 100k views as of time of writing", "2015). It's arguable that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works", "[Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown really", "and there are more facts about them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The", "Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown really big. It's roughly the fifth", "them and they are often very similar to each other. However, there aren't", "MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown really big.", "aren't many publishers of MDPI's size. They attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)),", "more facts about them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has", "to each other. However, there aren't many publishers of MDPI's size. They attract", "an answer for small publishers, since there are so many of them and", "as an answer for small publishers, since there are so many of them", "publishers, since there are so many of them and they are often very", "has grown really big. It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall now, which", "and they are often very similar to each other. However, there aren't many", "that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as an answer", "It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall now, which is incredible considering that", "They attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts about", "not voted but I'm thinking of doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic", "reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher) Jaaqon is that MDPI has grown really big. It's roughly", "in 2015). It's arguable that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question)", "they are often very similar to each other. However, there aren't many publishers", "predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as an answer for small publishers, since", "overall now, which is incredible considering that it was much smaller (~17th in", "other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts about them available (e.g. their", "I've not voted but I'm thinking of doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable", "voted but I'm thinking of doing so: [Is MDPI a reputable Academic Publisher?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5466/is-mdpi-a-reputable-academic-publisher)", "often very similar to each other. However, there aren't many publishers of MDPI's", "[annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close to 100k views as of time", "identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as an answer for small publishers,", "that it was much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable that [How to", "of MDPI's size. They attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are", "\"duplicate\" question) works as an answer for small publishers, since there are so", "is incredible considering that it was much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable", "about them available (e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close to", "question) works as an answer for small publishers, since there are so many", "much smaller (~17th in 2015). It's arguable that [How to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals)", "really big. It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall now, which is incredible", "to identify predatory publishers/journals](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/2158/how-to-identify-predatory-publishers-journals) (the \"duplicate\" question) works as an answer for small", "size. They attract attention from other publishers ([example](https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/08/10/guest-post-mdpis-remarkable-growth/)), and there are more facts", "(e.g. their [annual report](https://res.mdpi.com/data/2019_web.pdf)). The question also has close to 100k views as", "big. It's roughly the fifth biggest publisher overall now, which is incredible considering" ]
[ "and that we should amend the definition of 'shopping question' to make them", "the limits of 'shopping' questions when it comes to software?\". In that case,", "question is much more relevant than the one linked by the question closer.", "the community here. In contrast, I might point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software)", "site for this kind of questions, and that we should amend the definition", "is much more relevant than the one linked by the question closer. Compare", "meta question is, \"What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online", "relates to an important academic-integrity issue which has had numerous other questions on", "that have been left open on SE Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin),", "questions of this nature now be closed, or left open? Note: After a", "answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\" But the question I posed", "web service, which is publicly available to any instructor, and relates to an", "open on SE Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is", "other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the issue of, \"What are the", "a narrowly-focused question about a particular online software tool, which relates to an", "case, the top-voted answer observes that specialized software tools are intrinsic to the", "specific online web service, which is publicly available to any instructor, and relates", "is not OK.\" But the question I posed is not about evaluating an", "issue of academic integrity, truly a shopping question? Should all questions of this", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few years ago. The title of that meta", "and concluding query-statement by another member, the given question has been reopened by", "the highlighted summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\"", "in the meta question are all of the form, \"Is organization X useful?\".", "are not on topic already.\" I think that meta question is much more", "all questions of this nature now be closed, or left open? Note: After", "closed, or left open? Note: After a fairly small edit to the title", "which relates to an issue of academic integrity, truly a shopping question? Should", "all of the form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And the highlighted summary of", "services?\", but the body of the question, and the accepted answer, deal with", "software tools are intrinsic to the work of many academics, and summarizes that,", "\"What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?\", but the", "find a consensus response by the community here. In contrast, I might point", "to the work of many academics, and summarizes that, \"I think that this", "(on the same theme, another specific online tool to support academic integrity checks)", "years ago. The title of that meta question is, \"What to do with", "work of many academics, and summarizes that, \"I think that this is the", "now be closed, or left open? Note: After a fairly small edit to", "point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the issue of,", "few years ago. The title of that meta question is, \"What to do", "then closed it as a \"shopping\" question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on", "That is: the examples in the meta question are all of the form,", "make them on-topic if they are not on topic already.\" I think that", "had numerous other questions on SE in the past year, to vote and", "to software?\". In that case, the top-voted answer observes that specialized software tools", "particular online software tool, which relates to an issue of academic integrity, truly", "the one linked by the question closer. Compare also to several questions specifically", "answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web", "we should amend the definition of 'shopping question' to make them on-topic if", "that meta question is much more relevant than the one linked by the", "I might point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the", "highlighted summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\" But", "\"shopping\" question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few years", "kind of questions, and that we should amend the definition of 'shopping question'", "question' to make them on-topic if they are not on topic already.\" I", "this kind of questions, and that we should amend the definition of 'shopping", "they are not on topic already.\" I think that meta question is much", "of 'shopping' questions when it comes to software?\". In that case, the top-voted", "tool, which relates to an issue of academic integrity, truly a shopping question?", "closed it as a \"shopping\" question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta", "the question I posed is not about evaluating an organization in general. It", "that, \"I think that this is the right site for this kind of", "to any instructor, and relates to an important academic-integrity issue which has had", "summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\" But the", "I asked and suggested an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should", "and relates to an important academic-integrity issue which has had numerous other questions", "to vote and find a consensus response by the community here. In contrast,", "shopping question? Should all questions of this nature now be closed, or left", "the question, and the accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations in general. That", "service (on the same theme, another specific online tool to support academic integrity", "year, on the issue of, \"What are the limits of 'shopping' questions when", "posed is not about evaluating an organization in general. It is putting up", "the top-voted answer observes that specialized software tools are intrinsic to the work", "from the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received a number", "right site for this kind of questions, and that we should amend the", "And the highlighted summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is not", "Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received a number of upvotes,", "question is, \"What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?\",", "observes that specialized software tools are intrinsic to the work of many academics,", "is, \"What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?\", but", "from community members. However, a moderator then closed it as a \"shopping\" question,", "contrast, I might point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on", "title and concluding query-statement by another member, the given question has been reopened", "of this nature now be closed, or left open? Note: After a fairly", "questions when it comes to software?\". In that case, the top-voted answer observes", "to the title and concluding query-statement by another member, the given question has", "community here. In contrast, I might point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from", "been left open on SE Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and", "asked and suggested an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use", "title of that meta question is, \"What to do with questions asking to", "in the past year, to vote and find a consensus response by the", "organization in general. It is putting up a specific online web service, which", "suggestions to close from community members. However, a moderator then closed it as", "not about evaluating an organization in general. It is putting up a specific", "question? Should all questions of this nature now be closed, or left open?", "quickly received a number of upvotes, and no suggestions to close from community", "questions specifically about the Turnitin service (on the same theme, another specific online", "year, to vote and find a consensus response by the community here. In", "of, \"What are the limits of 'shopping' questions when it comes to software?\".", "online services?\", but the body of the question, and the accepted answer, deal", "The question quickly received a number of upvotes, and no suggestions to close", "the question closer. Compare also to several questions specifically about the Turnitin service", "this nature now be closed, or left open? Note: After a fairly small", "evaluating an organization in general. It is putting up a specific online web", "concluding query-statement by another member, the given question has been reopened by community", "SE in the past year, to vote and find a consensus response by", "question quickly received a number of upvotes, and no suggestions to close from", "which is publicly available to any instructor, and relates to an important academic-integrity", "an organization in general. It is putting up a specific online web service,", "that meta question is, \"What to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial", "the Turnitin service (on the same theme, another specific online tool to support", "vote and find a consensus response by the community here. In contrast, I", "that we should amend the definition of 'shopping question' to make them on-topic", "available to any instructor, and relates to an important academic-integrity issue which has", "in general. It is putting up a specific online web service, which is", "or left open? Note: After a fairly small edit to the title and", "important academic-integrity issue which has had numerous other questions on SE in the", "to an important academic-integrity issue which has had numerous other questions on SE", "narrowly-focused question about a particular online software tool, which relates to an issue", "meta question are all of the form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And the", "in general. That is: the examples in the meta question are all of", "a \"shopping\" question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few", "on meta from a few years ago. The title of that meta question", "number of upvotes, and no suggestions to close from community members. However, a", "definition of 'shopping question' to make them on-topic if they are not on", "academic integrity checks) that have been left open on SE Academia over the", "issue of, \"What are the limits of 'shopping' questions when it comes to", "do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?\", but the body of", "the definition of 'shopping question' to make them on-topic if they are not", "think that this is the right site for this kind of questions, and", "questions, and that we should amend the definition of 'shopping question' to make", "the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\" But the question I", "\"I think that this is the right site for this kind of questions,", "putting up a specific online web service, which is publicly available to any", "specifically about the Turnitin service (on the same theme, another specific online tool", "It is putting up a specific online web service, which is publicly available", "up a specific online web service, which is publicly available to any instructor,", "newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question", "to an issue of academic integrity, truly a shopping question? Should all questions", "question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few years ago.", "whether instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the Chegg company", "software tool, which relates to an issue of academic integrity, truly a shopping", "same theme, another specific online tool to support academic integrity checks) that have", "should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the Chegg company (the \"Honor", "by the community here. In contrast, I might point to [this other meta", "the right site for this kind of questions, and that we should amend", "academic-integrity issue which has had numerous other questions on SE in the past", "answer observes that specialized software tools are intrinsic to the work of many", "question closer. Compare also to several questions specifically about the Turnitin service (on", "service, which is publicly available to any instructor, and relates to an important", "online web service, which is publicly available to any instructor, and relates to", "should amend the definition of 'shopping question' to make them on-topic if they", "about the Turnitin service (on the same theme, another specific online tool to", "to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the issue of, \"What", "a few years ago. The title of that meta question is, \"What to", "members. However, a moderator then closed it as a \"shopping\" question, linking back", "checks) that have been left open on SE Academia over the years, e.g.,", "but the body of the question, and the accepted answer, deal with assessing", "Compare also to several questions specifically about the Turnitin service (on the same", "to close from community members. However, a moderator then closed it as a", "question about a particular online software tool, which relates to an issue of", "this is the right site for this kind of questions, and that we", "left open on SE Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin).", "on SE in the past year, to vote and find a consensus response", "open? Note: After a fairly small edit to the title and concluding query-statement", "several questions specifically about the Turnitin service (on the same theme, another specific", "of questions, and that we should amend the definition of 'shopping question' to", "be closed, or left open? Note: After a fairly small edit to the", "from last year, on the issue of, \"What are the limits of 'shopping'", "numerous other questions on SE in the past year, to vote and find", "asking to evaluate commercial online services?\", but the body of the question, and", "query-statement by another member, the given question has been reopened by community voting.", "have been left open on SE Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper),", "edit to the title and concluding query-statement by another member, the given question", "past year, to vote and find a consensus response by the community here.", "question I posed is not about evaluating an organization in general. It is", "academics, and summarizes that, \"I think that this is the right site for", "organizations in general. That is: the examples in the meta question are all", "the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about a", "integrity, truly a shopping question? Should all questions of this nature now be", "general. That is: the examples in the meta question are all of the", "academic integrity, truly a shopping question? Should all questions of this nature now", "closer. Compare also to several questions specifically about the Turnitin service (on the", "here. In contrast, I might point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last", "and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about a particular online software tool, which", "a fairly small edit to the title and concluding query-statement by another member,", "a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The", "meta from a few years ago. The title of that meta question is,", "on topic already.\" I think that meta question is much more relevant than", "about a particular online software tool, which relates to an issue of academic", "not OK.\" But the question I posed is not about evaluating an organization", "online tool to support academic integrity checks) that have been left open on", "is the right site for this kind of questions, and that we should", "question, and the accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations in general. That is:", "that this is the right site for this kind of questions, and that", "[this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few years ago. The title of that", "last year, on the issue of, \"What are the limits of 'shopping' questions", "to make them on-topic if they are not on topic already.\" I think", "than the one linked by the question closer. Compare also to several questions", "is not about evaluating an organization in general. It is putting up a", "is: the examples in the meta question are all of the form, \"Is", "as a \"shopping\" question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a", "Shield\"). The question quickly received a number of upvotes, and no suggestions to", "the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received a number of", "examples in the meta question are all of the form, \"Is organization X", "\"Is organization X useful?\". And the highlighted summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating", "no suggestions to close from community members. However, a moderator then closed it", "consensus response by the community here. In contrast, I might point to [this", "when it comes to software?\". In that case, the top-voted answer observes that", "\"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\" But the question I posed is not", "other questions on SE in the past year, to vote and find a", "relates to an issue of academic integrity, truly a shopping question? Should all", "to do with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?\", but the body", "of the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\" But the question", "[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about a particular online software tool,", "instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the Chegg company (the", "company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received a number of upvotes, and", "of the form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And the highlighted summary of the", "general. It is putting up a specific online web service, which is publicly", "of many academics, and summarizes that, \"I think that this is the right", "[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about a particular online software", "to support academic integrity checks) that have been left open on SE Academia", "\"What are the limits of 'shopping' questions when it comes to software?\". In", "a consensus response by the community here. In contrast, I might point to", "software?\". In that case, the top-voted answer observes that specialized software tools are", "topic already.\" I think that meta question is much more relevant than the", "deal with assessing organizations in general. That is: the examples in the meta", "that specialized software tools are intrinsic to the work of many academics, and", "intrinsic to the work of many academics, and summarizes that, \"I think that", "are all of the form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And the highlighted summary", "a shopping question? Should all questions of this nature now be closed, or", "an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity", "received a number of upvotes, and no suggestions to close from community members.", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the", "and summarizes that, \"I think that this is the right site for this", "the past year, to vote and find a consensus response by the community", "linked by the question closer. Compare also to several questions specifically about the", "In that case, the top-voted answer observes that specialized software tools are intrinsic", "I posed is not about evaluating an organization in general. It is putting", "one linked by the question closer. Compare also to several questions specifically about", "over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about", "e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about a particular online", "think that meta question is much more relevant than the one linked by", "of that meta question is, \"What to do with questions asking to evaluate", "specialized software tools are intrinsic to the work of many academics, and summarizes", "In contrast, I might point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year,", "amend the definition of 'shopping question' to make them on-topic if they are", "the form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And the highlighted summary of the answer", "Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question", "many academics, and summarizes that, \"I think that this is the right site", "nature now be closed, or left open? Note: After a fairly small edit", "service from the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received a", "the meta question are all of the form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And", "SE Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused", "is putting up a specific online web service, which is publicly available to", "form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And the highlighted summary of the answer is,", "about whether instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the Chegg", "I think that meta question is much more relevant than the one linked", "and the accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations in general. That is: the", "meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the issue of, \"What are the limits", "that case, the top-voted answer observes that specialized software tools are intrinsic to", "online software tool, which relates to an issue of academic integrity, truly a", "The title of that meta question is, \"What to do with questions asking", "it as a \"shopping\" question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from", "years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about a particular", "But the question I posed is not about evaluating an organization in general.", "instructor, and relates to an important academic-integrity issue which has had numerous other", "might point to [this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the issue", "a number of upvotes, and no suggestions to close from community members. However,", "community members. However, a moderator then closed it as a \"shopping\" question, linking", "body of the question, and the accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations in", "X useful?\". And the highlighted summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization", "which has had numerous other questions on SE in the past year, to", "small edit to the title and concluding query-statement by another member, the given", "and find a consensus response by the community here. In contrast, I might", "on SE Academia over the years, e.g., [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38385/potential-issues-with-uploading-copyrighted-material-to-turnitin), [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/81802/does-turnitin-match-my-paper-against-sources-found-after-i-submitted-by-paper), and [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a", "questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?\", but the body of the question,", "on the issue of, \"What are the limits of 'shopping' questions when it", "a specific online web service, which is publicly available to any instructor, and", "also to several questions specifically about the Turnitin service (on the same theme,", "top-voted answer observes that specialized software tools are intrinsic to the work of", "moderator then closed it as a \"shopping\" question, linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services)", "is publicly available to any instructor, and relates to an important academic-integrity issue", "relevant than the one linked by the question closer. Compare also to several", "theme, another specific online tool to support academic integrity checks) that have been", "are the limits of 'shopping' questions when it comes to software?\". In that", "an important academic-integrity issue which has had numerous other questions on SE in", "the same theme, another specific online tool to support academic integrity checks) that", "back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few years ago. The title", "from a few years ago. The title of that meta question is, \"What", "publicly available to any instructor, and relates to an important academic-integrity issue which", "has had numerous other questions on SE in the past year, to vote", "an organization is not OK.\" But the question I posed is not about", "by the question closer. Compare also to several questions specifically about the Turnitin", "specific online tool to support academic integrity checks) that have been left open", "and no suggestions to close from community members. However, a moderator then closed", "the body of the question, and the accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations", "them on-topic if they are not on topic already.\" I think that meta", "summarizes that, \"I think that this is the right site for this kind", "truly a shopping question? Should all questions of this nature now be closed,", "with questions asking to evaluate commercial online services?\", but the body of the", "of 'shopping question' to make them on-topic if they are not on topic", "upvotes, and no suggestions to close from community members. However, a moderator then", "support academic integrity checks) that have been left open on SE Academia over", "assessing organizations in general. That is: the examples in the meta question are", "'shopping question' to make them on-topic if they are not on topic already.\"", "questions on SE in the past year, to vote and find a consensus", "answer, deal with assessing organizations in general. That is: the examples in the", "After a fairly small edit to the title and concluding query-statement by another", "for this kind of questions, and that we should amend the definition of", "any instructor, and relates to an important academic-integrity issue which has had numerous", "the accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations in general. That is: the examples", "are intrinsic to the work of many academics, and summarizes that, \"I think", "response by the community here. In contrast, I might point to [this other", "the examples in the meta question are all of the form, \"Is organization", "ago. The title of that meta question is, \"What to do with questions", "'shopping' questions when it comes to software?\". In that case, the top-voted answer", "However, a moderator then closed it as a \"shopping\" question, linking back to", "to evaluate commercial online services?\", but the body of the question, and the", "suggested an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use a newly-presented", "organization is not OK.\" But the question I posed is not about evaluating", "and suggested an answer to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use a", "organization X useful?\". And the highlighted summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating an", "the work of many academics, and summarizes that, \"I think that this is", "meta question is much more relevant than the one linked by the question", "evaluate commercial online services?\", but the body of the question, and the accepted", "to several questions specifically about the Turnitin service (on the same theme, another", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from", "integrity checks) that have been left open on SE Academia over the years,", "if they are not on topic already.\" I think that meta question is", "web service from the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received", "to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few years ago. The title of", "use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service from the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\").", "more relevant than the one linked by the question closer. Compare also to", "commercial online services?\", but the body of the question, and the accepted answer,", "question are all of the form, \"Is organization X useful?\". And the highlighted", "OK.\" But the question I posed is not about evaluating an organization in", "of academic integrity, truly a shopping question? Should all questions of this nature", "Note: After a fairly small edit to the title and concluding query-statement by", "it comes to software?\". In that case, the top-voted answer observes that specialized", "much more relevant than the one linked by the question closer. Compare also", "Turnitin service (on the same theme, another specific online tool to support academic", "is, \"Evaluating an organization is not OK.\" But the question I posed is", "of the question, and the accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations in general.", "tool to support academic integrity checks) that have been left open on SE", "a particular online software tool, which relates to an issue of academic integrity,", "[this other meta question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the issue of, \"What are", "the title and concluding query-statement by another member, the given question has been", "limits of 'shopping' questions when it comes to software?\". In that case, the", "issue which has had numerous other questions on SE in the past year,", "a moderator then closed it as a \"shopping\" question, linking back to [this", "linking back to [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4062/what-to-do-with-questions-asking-to-evaluate-commercial-online-services) on meta from a few years ago. The", "another specific online tool to support academic integrity checks) that have been left", "(the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received a number of upvotes, and no", "[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/115327/invitation-to-anti-plagiarism-service-turnitin). Is a narrowly-focused question about a particular online software tool, which relates", "\"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly received a number of upvotes, and no suggestions", "an issue of academic integrity, truly a shopping question? Should all questions of", "already.\" I think that meta question is much more relevant than the one", "to [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/165912/should-instructors-make-use-of-the-chegg-honor-shield-tool) about whether instructors should use a newly-presented academic-integrity web service", "about evaluating an organization in general. It is putting up a specific online", "accepted answer, deal with assessing organizations in general. That is: the examples in", "academic-integrity web service from the Chegg company (the \"Honor Shield\"). The question quickly", "close from community members. However, a moderator then closed it as a \"shopping\"", "useful?\". And the highlighted summary of the answer is, \"Evaluating an organization is", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) from last year, on the issue of, \"What are the limits of", "tools are intrinsic to the work of many academics, and summarizes that, \"I", "comes to software?\". In that case, the top-voted answer observes that specialized software", "of upvotes, and no suggestions to close from community members. However, a moderator", "fairly small edit to the title and concluding query-statement by another member, the", "the issue of, \"What are the limits of 'shopping' questions when it comes", "left open? Note: After a fairly small edit to the title and concluding", "Is a narrowly-focused question about a particular online software tool, which relates to", "Should all questions of this nature now be closed, or left open? Note:", "with assessing organizations in general. That is: the examples in the meta question", "not on topic already.\" I think that meta question is much more relevant", "on-topic if they are not on topic already.\" I think that meta question" ]
[ "newcomers. On SE sites it is possible to customize the content of the", "from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest", "often that new posters are confused about the scope of this site, for", "least it did at some point in time --- I don't want to", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks like on Mathematics, where", "can ask about every possible study topic here\" site, or a \"here's the", "the \"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers)", "what should I do\" site. This leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation work,", "verify that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image", "how it looks like on Mathematics, where it is even more informative (or", "there just to verify that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still", "avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where unfortunately the", "for a \"you can ask about every possible study topic here\" site, or", "it for a \"you can ask about every possible study topic here\" site,", "some text to describe the scope of our site; for instance, a shorter", "\"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on", "I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where unfortunately", "a \"you can ask about every possible study topic here\" site, or a", "for how it looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter", "just to verify that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate)", "off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On SE", "possible study topic here\" site, or a \"here's the story of my life,", "I don't want to create a new account there just to verify that", "Here is how it looks like on Mathematics, where it is even more", "that new posters are confused about the scope of this site, for instance", "do\" site. This leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard", "every possible study topic here\" site, or a \"here's the story of my", "\"you can ask about every possible study topic here\" site, or a \"here's", "askers. See below for how it looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server", "don't want to create a new account there just to verify that this", "or a \"here's the story of my life, what should I do\" site.", "is shown to first-time askers. See below for how it looks like on", "(or at least it did at some point in time --- I don't", "want to create a new account there just to verify that this screenshot", "this site, for instance mistaking it for a \"you can ask about every", "looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)", "of the \"how to ask\" window that is shown to first-time askers. See", "on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image", "posters are confused about the scope of this site, for instance mistaking it", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks like on Mathematics, where it is even", "paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where unfortunately the suggestion", "site; for instance, a shorter version of the \"What topics should I avoid?\"", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks like on Mathematics,", "like on Mathematics, where it is even more informative (or at least it", "On SE sites it is possible to customize the content of the \"how", "at least it did at some point in time --- I don't want", "the scope of our site; for instance, a shorter version of the \"What", "site. This leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks like on Mathematics, where it", "at some point in time --- I don't want to create a new", "question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some", "mistaking it for a \"you can ask about every possible study topic here\"", "is even more informative (or at least it did at some point in", "here\" site, or a \"here's the story of my life, what should I", "scope of our site; for instance, a shorter version of the \"What topics", "should I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where", "moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On SE sites it is", "the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where unfortunately the suggestion was never", "and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here", "are confused about the scope of this site, for instance mistaking it for", "shown to first-time askers. See below for how it looks like on Academia", "feelings from newcomers. On SE sites it is possible to customize the content", "even more informative (or at least it did at some point in time", "informative (or at least it did at some point in time --- I", "Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is", "hard feelings from newcomers. On SE sites it is possible to customize the", "ask about every possible study topic here\" site, or a \"here's the story", "new posters are confused about the scope of this site, for instance mistaking", "\"how to ask\" window that is shown to first-time askers. See below for", "This leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings from", "screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I", "and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On SE sites it is possible to", "where it is even more informative (or at least it did at some", "site, or a \"here's the story of my life, what should I do\"", "that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image description", "Mathematics, where it is even more informative (or at least it did at", "scope of this site, for instance mistaking it for a \"you can ask", "window that is shown to first-time askers. See below for how it looks", "this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)", "in time --- I don't want to create a new account there just", "work, and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On SE sites it is possible", "my life, what should I do\" site. This leads to off-topic questions, additional", "to add some text to describe the scope of our site; for instance,", "first-time askers. See below for how it looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and", "account there just to verify that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is", "describe the scope of our site; for instance, a shorter version of the", "See below for how it looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault", "point in time --- I don't want to create a new account there", "[Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add", "it looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description", "a \"here's the story of my life, what should I do\" site. This", "customize the content of the \"how to ask\" window that is shown to", "is still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some text", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some text to describe the", "our site; for instance, a shorter version of the \"What topics should I", "--- I don't want to create a new account there just to verify", "create a new account there just to verify that this screenshot from the", "I suggest to add some text to describe the scope of our site;", "a shorter version of the \"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on the", "to describe the scope of our site; for instance, a shorter version of", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks like", "of the \"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar", "content of the \"how to ask\" window that is shown to first-time askers.", "instance mistaking it for a \"you can ask about every possible study topic", "possible to customize the content of the \"how to ask\" window that is", "additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On SE sites it", "\"here's the story of my life, what should I do\" site. This leads", "new account there just to verify that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers)", "should I do\" site. This leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and", "text to describe the scope of our site; for instance, a shorter version", "version of the \"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic).", "to off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On", "of my life, what should I do\" site. This leads to off-topic questions,", "about the scope of this site, for instance mistaking it for a \"you", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some text to describe the scope", "to customize the content of the \"how to ask\" window that is shown", "story of my life, what should I do\" site. This leads to off-topic", "of this site, for instance mistaking it for a \"you can ask about", "life, what should I do\" site. This leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation", "for instance mistaking it for a \"you can ask about every possible study", "quite often that new posters are confused about the scope of this site,", "It happens quite often that new posters are confused about the scope of", "to first-time askers. See below for how it looks like on Academia (non-personalized)", "topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow", "it is possible to customize the content of the \"how to ask\" window", "some point in time --- I don't want to create a new account", "for instance, a shorter version of the \"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph", "below for how it looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized).", "[help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where unfortunately the suggestion was never applied).", "happens quite often that new posters are confused about the scope of this", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks", "questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On SE sites", "(non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)", "study topic here\" site, or a \"here's the story of my life, what", "suggest to add some text to describe the scope of our site; for", "the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to", "the scope of this site, for instance mistaking it for a \"you can", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks like on Mathematics, where it is", "of our site; for instance, a shorter version of the \"What topics should", "about every possible study topic here\" site, or a \"here's the story of", "time --- I don't want to create a new account there just to", "accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some text to describe", "to ask\" window that is shown to first-time askers. See below for how", "the \"how to ask\" window that is shown to first-time askers. See below", "(personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it", "like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter", "leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers.", "on Mathematics, where it is even more informative (or at least it did", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some text to describe the scope of our", "instance, a shorter version of the \"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on", "shorter version of the \"What topics should I avoid?\" paragraph on the [help", "ask\" window that is shown to first-time askers. See below for how it", "it is even more informative (or at least it did at some point", "it looks like on Mathematics, where it is even more informative (or at", "still accurate) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some text to", "to verify that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO question](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) is still accurate) [![enter", "confused about the scope of this site, for instance mistaking it for a", "is possible to customize the content of the \"how to ask\" window that", "how it looks like on Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image", "to create a new account there just to verify that this screenshot from", "a new account there just to verify that this screenshot from the [Meta.MO", "the story of my life, what should I do\" site. This leads to", "sites it is possible to customize the content of the \"how to ask\"", "it did at some point in time --- I don't want to create", "from newcomers. On SE sites it is possible to customize the content of", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how it looks like on", "is how it looks like on Mathematics, where it is even more informative", "did at some point in time --- I don't want to create a", "topic here\" site, or a \"here's the story of my life, what should", "I do\" site. This leads to off-topic questions, additional moderation work, and unnecessary", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/Tknmd.png) I suggest to add some text to describe the scope of", "the content of the \"how to ask\" window that is shown to first-time", "looks like on Mathematics, where it is even more informative (or at least", "on the [help pages](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). [Similar thread](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/4806/customize-the-modal-window-for-the-first-time-askers) on Meta.Mathoverflow (where unfortunately the suggestion was", "Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/EhjOW.png) Here is how", "that is shown to first-time askers. See below for how it looks like", "Academia (non-personalized) and Server Fault (personalized). [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/wIzUL.png) [![enter image description", "site, for instance mistaking it for a \"you can ask about every possible", "more informative (or at least it did at some point in time ---", "unnecessary hard feelings from newcomers. On SE sites it is possible to customize", "SE sites it is possible to customize the content of the \"how to", "add some text to describe the scope of our site; for instance, a" ]
[ "is: is it better to try and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of", "is it better to try and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of hard", "which are closed because they depend too much on the individual who is", "and therefore seems an obvious candidate for voting to close due to dependence", "But will this erode the purpose of SE over time? --- This is", "given basically boils down to \"your mentality is similar to most academics\", which", "be answered, usually with a small amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if", "here: [Is My Mentality Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case,", "extent opinion-based and could be a comment rather than an answer. However, the", "comment rather than an answer. However, the answer may still have been helpful", "ethos of hard questions and answers (more difficult on a \"soft\" site like", "still have been helpful to the OP. My question is: is it better", "answer) and therefore refrain from answering questions which are obvious candidates for closure?", "world and obviously not receiving guidance from peers and mentors in their own", "the answer may still have been helpful to the OP. My question is:", "still be answered, usually with a small amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially", "their own circle. But will this erode the purpose of SE over time?", "and answers (more difficult on a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway where there", "recent example of what I'm describing is here: [Is My Mentality Good for", "Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question is about the OP's", "an answer. However, the answer may still have been helpful to the OP.", "possible by trying to answer before the question is closed? I often wonder", "are obvious candidates for closure? Or is it better to try and help", "refrain from answering questions which are obvious candidates for closure? Or is it", "help as many of these individuals as possible by trying to answer before", "from peers and mentors in their own circle. But will this erode the", "no right answer) and therefore refrain from answering questions which are obvious candidates", "to most academics\", which is to some extent opinion-based and could be a", "which are obvious candidates for closure? Or is it better to try and", "new to SE or clearly inexperienced in the academic world and obviously not", "of hard questions and answers (more difficult on a \"soft\" site like Academia", "closed because they depend too much on the individual who is asking and", "question is: is it better to try and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos", "guidance from peers and mentors in their own circle. But will this erode", "over time? --- This is my first question on Meta so any feedback,", "needs a quick helping hand. A recent example of what I'm describing is", "try and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions and answers (more", "which is to some extent opinion-based and could be a comment rather than", "example of what I'm describing is here: [Is My Mentality Good for Academia", "been helpful to the OP. My question is: is it better to try", "and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions and answers (more difficult", "about doing the latter, especially if the user is new to SE or", "the latter, especially if the user is new to SE or clearly inexperienced", "obviously not receiving guidance from peers and mentors in their own circle. But", "are closed because they depend too much on the individual who is asking", "audience. However, these questions often can still be answered, usually with a small", "about how academia works and needs a quick helping hand. A recent example", "this case, the question is about the OP's personal mentality and therefore seems", "of what I'm describing is here: [Is My Mentality Good for Academia /", "in their own circle. But will this erode the purpose of SE over", "to dependence on individual factors. The answer given basically boils down to \"your", "be a comment rather than an answer. However, the answer may still have", "close due to dependence on individual factors. The answer given basically boils down", "on individual factors. The answer given basically boils down to \"your mentality is", "The answer given basically boils down to \"your mentality is similar to most", "as many of these individuals as possible by trying to answer before the", "the asker doesn't know much about how academia works and needs a quick", "hand. A recent example of what I'm describing is here: [Is My Mentality", "is similar to most academics\", which is to some extent opinion-based and could", "it's clear that the asker doesn't know much about how academia works and", "too much on the individual who is asking and thus cannot be sufficiently", "personal mentality and therefore seems an obvious candidate for voting to close due", "the Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions and answers (more difficult on a", "question is about the OP's personal mentality and therefore seems an obvious candidate", "latter, especially if the user is new to SE or clearly inexperienced in", "--- This is my first question on Meta so any feedback, tag edits", "is often no right answer) and therefore refrain from answering questions which are", "individual factors. The answer given basically boils down to \"your mentality is similar", "will this erode the purpose of SE over time? --- This is my", "if it's clear that the asker doesn't know much about how academia works", "to some extent opinion-based and could be a comment rather than an answer.", "by trying to answer before the question is closed? I often wonder about", "closure? Or is it better to try and help as many of these", "the question is closed? I often wonder about doing the latter, especially if", "In this case, the question is about the OP's personal mentality and therefore", "inexperienced in the academic world and obviously not receiving guidance from peers and", "asking and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to be helpful to a wider", "doesn't know much about how academia works and needs a quick helping hand.", "difficult on a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway where there is often no", "cannot be sufficiently generalised to be helpful to a wider audience. However, these", "candidate for voting to close due to dependence on individual factors. The answer", "they depend too much on the individual who is asking and thus cannot", "than an answer. However, the answer may still have been helpful to the", "is my first question on Meta so any feedback, tag edits etc welcome!", "voting to close due to dependence on individual factors. The answer given basically", "case, the question is about the OP's personal mentality and therefore seems an", "describing is here: [Is My Mentality Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In", "SE which are closed because they depend too much on the individual who", "answer given basically boils down to \"your mentality is similar to most academics\",", "mentality and therefore seems an obvious candidate for voting to close due to", "with a small amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's clear that", "thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to be helpful to a wider audience. However,", "an obvious candidate for voting to close due to dependence on individual factors.", "and therefore refrain from answering questions which are obvious candidates for closure? Or", "works and needs a quick helping hand. A recent example of what I'm", "mentors in their own circle. But will this erode the purpose of SE", "receiving guidance from peers and mentors in their own circle. But will this", "therefore seems an obvious candidate for voting to close due to dependence on", "helpful to the OP. My question is: is it better to try and", "the academic world and obviously not receiving guidance from peers and mentors in", "the question is about the OP's personal mentality and therefore seems an obvious", "SE or clearly inexperienced in the academic world and obviously not receiving guidance", "many questions on Academia SE which are closed because they depend too much", "a quick helping hand. A recent example of what I'm describing is here:", "to close due to dependence on individual factors. The answer given basically boils", "these questions often can still be answered, usually with a small amount of", "a wider audience. However, these questions often can still be answered, usually with", "and mentors in their own circle. But will this erode the purpose of", "maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions and answers (more difficult on", "of these individuals as possible by trying to answer before the question is", "question is closed? I often wonder about doing the latter, especially if the", "for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question is about the", "answer before the question is closed? I often wonder about doing the latter,", "down to \"your mentality is similar to most academics\", which is to some", "is it better to try and help as many of these individuals as", "Academia SE which are closed because they depend too much on the individual", "often wonder about doing the latter, especially if the user is new to", "\"your mentality is similar to most academics\", which is to some extent opinion-based", "if the user is new to SE or clearly inexperienced in the academic", "Mentality Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question is", "answered, usually with a small amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's", "who is asking and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to be helpful to", "to try and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions and answers", "or clearly inexperienced in the academic world and obviously not receiving guidance from", "(more difficult on a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway where there is often", "Exchange ethos of hard questions and answers (more difficult on a \"soft\" site", "this erode the purpose of SE over time? --- This is my first", "it better to try and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions", "amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's clear that the asker doesn't", "time? --- This is my first question on Meta so any feedback, tag", "individual who is asking and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to be helpful", "boils down to \"your mentality is similar to most academics\", which is to", "can still be answered, usually with a small amount of (perhaps) generic advice,", "how academia works and needs a quick helping hand. A recent example of", "OP. My question is: is it better to try and maintain the Stack", "small amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's clear that the asker", "like Academia anyway where there is often no right answer) and therefore refrain", "especially if the user is new to SE or clearly inexperienced in the", "(perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's clear that the asker doesn't know much", "of SE over time? --- This is my first question on Meta so", "and needs a quick helping hand. A recent example of what I'm describing", "A recent example of what I'm describing is here: [Is My Mentality Good", "wonder about doing the latter, especially if the user is new to SE", "answers (more difficult on a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway where there is", "advice, especially if it's clear that the asker doesn't know much about how", "right answer) and therefore refrain from answering questions which are obvious candidates for", "is new to SE or clearly inexperienced in the academic world and obviously", "\"soft\" site like Academia anyway where there is often no right answer) and", "often no right answer) and therefore refrain from answering questions which are obvious", "from answering questions which are obvious candidates for closure? Or is it better", "clearly inexperienced in the academic world and obviously not receiving guidance from peers", "the OP's personal mentality and therefore seems an obvious candidate for voting to", "questions and answers (more difficult on a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway where", "/ Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question is about the OP's personal", "is about the OP's personal mentality and therefore seems an obvious candidate for", "obvious candidates for closure? Or is it better to try and help as", "much on the individual who is asking and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised", "sufficiently generalised to be helpful to a wider audience. However, these questions often", "is to some extent opinion-based and could be a comment rather than an", "questions on Academia SE which are closed because they depend too much on", "therefore refrain from answering questions which are obvious candidates for closure? Or is", "academia works and needs a quick helping hand. A recent example of what", "user is new to SE or clearly inexperienced in the academic world and", "helpful to a wider audience. However, these questions often can still be answered,", "wider audience. However, these questions often can still be answered, usually with a", "hard questions and answers (more difficult on a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway", "before the question is closed? I often wonder about doing the latter, especially", "is closed? I often wonder about doing the latter, especially if the user", "a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway where there is often no right answer)", "is asking and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to be helpful to a", "in the academic world and obviously not receiving guidance from peers and mentors", "I'm describing is here: [Is My Mentality Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school)", "for voting to close due to dependence on individual factors. The answer given", "My Mentality Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question", "individuals as possible by trying to answer before the question is closed? I", "a small amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's clear that the", "seems an obvious candidate for voting to close due to dependence on individual", "most academics\", which is to some extent opinion-based and could be a comment", "circle. But will this erode the purpose of SE over time? --- This", "This is my first question on Meta so any feedback, tag edits etc", "However, these questions often can still be answered, usually with a small amount", "what I'm describing is here: [Is My Mentality Good for Academia / Grad", "academics\", which is to some extent opinion-based and could be a comment rather", "rather than an answer. However, the answer may still have been helpful to", "answer. However, the answer may still have been helpful to the OP. My", "similar to most academics\", which is to some extent opinion-based and could be", "peers and mentors in their own circle. But will this erode the purpose", "generalised to be helpful to a wider audience. However, these questions often can", "have been helpful to the OP. My question is: is it better to", "for closure? Or is it better to try and help as many of", "obvious candidate for voting to close due to dependence on individual factors. The", "on the individual who is asking and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to", "not receiving guidance from peers and mentors in their own circle. But will", "could be a comment rather than an answer. However, the answer may still", "quick helping hand. A recent example of what I'm describing is here: [Is", "to a wider audience. However, these questions often can still be answered, usually", "Academia anyway where there is often no right answer) and therefore refrain from", "because they depend too much on the individual who is asking and thus", "However, the answer may still have been helpful to the OP. My question", "better to try and help as many of these individuals as possible by", "is here: [Is My Mentality Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this", "some extent opinion-based and could be a comment rather than an answer. However,", "I often wonder about doing the latter, especially if the user is new", "trying to answer before the question is closed? I often wonder about doing", "the individual who is asking and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to be", "be helpful to a wider audience. However, these questions often can still be", "and help as many of these individuals as possible by trying to answer", "on Academia SE which are closed because they depend too much on the", "to try and help as many of these individuals as possible by trying", "closed? I often wonder about doing the latter, especially if the user is", "Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions and answers (more difficult on a \"soft\"", "dependence on individual factors. The answer given basically boils down to \"your mentality", "School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question is about the OP's personal mentality and", "about the OP's personal mentality and therefore seems an obvious candidate for voting", "due to dependence on individual factors. The answer given basically boils down to", "helping hand. A recent example of what I'm describing is here: [Is My", "to the OP. My question is: is it better to try and maintain", "and could be a comment rather than an answer. However, the answer may", "[Is My Mentality Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the", "Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question is about the OP's personal mentality", "especially if it's clear that the asker doesn't know much about how academia", "of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's clear that the asker doesn't know", "site like Academia anyway where there is often no right answer) and therefore", "better to try and maintain the Stack Exchange ethos of hard questions and", "academic world and obviously not receiving guidance from peers and mentors in their", "there is often no right answer) and therefore refrain from answering questions which", "My question is: is it better to try and maintain the Stack Exchange", "anyway where there is often no right answer) and therefore refrain from answering", "questions often can still be answered, usually with a small amount of (perhaps)", "to \"your mentality is similar to most academics\", which is to some extent", "candidates for closure? Or is it better to try and help as many", "OP's personal mentality and therefore seems an obvious candidate for voting to close", "a comment rather than an answer. However, the answer may still have been", "to answer before the question is closed? I often wonder about doing the", "to be helpful to a wider audience. However, these questions often can still", "try and help as many of these individuals as possible by trying to", "own circle. But will this erode the purpose of SE over time? ---", "these individuals as possible by trying to answer before the question is closed?", "answer may still have been helpful to the OP. My question is: is", "on a \"soft\" site like Academia anyway where there is often no right", "Good for Academia / Grad School?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166524/is-my-mentality-good-for-academia-grad-school) In this case, the question is about", "generic advice, especially if it's clear that the asker doesn't know much about", "may still have been helpful to the OP. My question is: is it", "doing the latter, especially if the user is new to SE or clearly", "many of these individuals as possible by trying to answer before the question", "opinion-based and could be a comment rather than an answer. However, the answer", "erode the purpose of SE over time? --- This is my first question", "Or is it better to try and help as many of these individuals", "factors. The answer given basically boils down to \"your mentality is similar to", "answering questions which are obvious candidates for closure? Or is it better to", "get many questions on Academia SE which are closed because they depend too", "much about how academia works and needs a quick helping hand. A recent", "usually with a small amount of (perhaps) generic advice, especially if it's clear", "SE over time? --- This is my first question on Meta so any", "that the asker doesn't know much about how academia works and needs a", "it better to try and help as many of these individuals as possible", "the purpose of SE over time? --- This is my first question on", "asker doesn't know much about how academia works and needs a quick helping", "purpose of SE over time? --- This is my first question on Meta", "We get many questions on Academia SE which are closed because they depend", "depend too much on the individual who is asking and thus cannot be", "be sufficiently generalised to be helpful to a wider audience. However, these questions", "questions which are obvious candidates for closure? Or is it better to try", "as possible by trying to answer before the question is closed? I often", "and obviously not receiving guidance from peers and mentors in their own circle.", "often can still be answered, usually with a small amount of (perhaps) generic", "where there is often no right answer) and therefore refrain from answering questions", "the OP. My question is: is it better to try and maintain the", "clear that the asker doesn't know much about how academia works and needs", "basically boils down to \"your mentality is similar to most academics\", which is", "and thus cannot be sufficiently generalised to be helpful to a wider audience.", "know much about how academia works and needs a quick helping hand. A", "the user is new to SE or clearly inexperienced in the academic world", "mentality is similar to most academics\", which is to some extent opinion-based and", "to SE or clearly inexperienced in the academic world and obviously not receiving" ]
[ "question was going to be this: \"Why does this CDC page on reinfections", "expect to be part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite", "rigorous citations (but only generic content sources) that I would expect to be", "this page on the CDC does not have rigorous citations (but only generic", "quite sure which exact stack exchange to ask it on, but my question", "ask it on, but my question was going to be this: \"Why does", "about why this page on the CDC does not have rigorous citations (but", "which exact stack exchange to ask it on, but my question was going", "not have directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted some input on whether this", "wanted some input on whether this was in scope for Academia stack exchange.", "stack exchange to ask it on, but my question was going to be", "page on the CDC does not have rigorous citations (but only generic content", "am not quite sure which exact stack exchange to ask it on, but", "CDC does not have rigorous citations (but only generic content sources) that I", "on, but my question was going to be this: \"Why does this CDC", "to be part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure", "not have rigorous citations (but only generic content sources) that I would expect", "directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted some input on whether this was in", "reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted some input on whether", "I wanted some input on whether this was in scope for Academia stack", "this CDC page on reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted", "I would expect to be part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am", "to ask a question about why this page on the CDC does not", "does not have rigorous citations (but only generic content sources) that I would", "organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure which exact stack exchange to ask", "exchange to ask it on, but my question was going to be this:", "to be this: \"Why does this CDC page on reinfections not have directly", "that I would expect to be part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I", "on the CDC does not have rigorous citations (but only generic content sources)", "<https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure which exact stack exchange to ask it", "exact stack exchange to ask it on, but my question was going to", "on reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted some input on", "be part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure which", "\"Why does this CDC page on reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\", and", "citations (but only generic content sources) that I would expect to be part", "page on reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted some input", "would expect to be part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not", "sources) that I would expect to be part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>.", "on whether this was in scope for Academia stack exchange. Thank you for", "have rigorous citations (but only generic content sources) that I would expect to", "to ask it on, but my question was going to be this: \"Why", "but my question was going to be this: \"Why does this CDC page", "whether this was in scope for Academia stack exchange. Thank you for you", "was going to be this: \"Why does this CDC page on reinfections not", "scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure which exact stack exchange to", "it on, but my question was going to be this: \"Why does this", "the CDC does not have rigorous citations (but only generic content sources) that", "(but only generic content sources) that I would expect to be part of", "be this: \"Why does this CDC page on reinfections not have directly sourced", "does this CDC page on reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\", and I", "wanted to ask a question about why this page on the CDC does", "sourced citations?\", and I wanted some input on whether this was in scope", "citations?\", and I wanted some input on whether this was in scope for", "generic content sources) that I would expect to be part of a scientific", "not quite sure which exact stack exchange to ask it on, but my", "I wanted to ask a question about why this page on the CDC", "part of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure which exact", "content sources) that I would expect to be part of a scientific organization:", "I am not quite sure which exact stack exchange to ask it on,", "this was in scope for Academia stack exchange. Thank you for you input.", "my question was going to be this: \"Why does this CDC page on", "going to be this: \"Why does this CDC page on reinfections not have", "and I wanted some input on whether this was in scope for Academia", "of a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure which exact stack", "a question about why this page on the CDC does not have rigorous", "some input on whether this was in scope for Academia stack exchange. Thank", "ask a question about why this page on the CDC does not have", "question about why this page on the CDC does not have rigorous citations", "have directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted some input on whether this was", "input on whether this was in scope for Academia stack exchange. Thank you", "CDC page on reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\", and I wanted some", "this: \"Why does this CDC page on reinfections not have directly sourced citations?\",", "why this page on the CDC does not have rigorous citations (but only", "sure which exact stack exchange to ask it on, but my question was", "a scientific organization: <https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html>. I am not quite sure which exact stack exchange", "only generic content sources) that I would expect to be part of a" ]
[ "The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than a year old,", "description, and seems to cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged", "to cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I", "questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than", "[coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag", "similar but distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show", "questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show", "questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than a year old, is used on only", "old, is used on only twelve questions (two of which are also tagged", "[courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a synonym of [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions", "— [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The", "suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a synonym of [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework", "questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a synonym of [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\").", "[coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged", "'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged", "\"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses", "(two of which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has", "a year old, is used on only twelve questions (two of which are", "two very similar but distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and", "and seems to cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\").", "of which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no", "also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and", "only twelve questions (two of which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions", "'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and seems to cover the same topics as", "\"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\")", "noticed two very similar but distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")", "very similar but distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses", "\"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than a year old, is used on", "\"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a synonym of [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged", "I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a synonym of", "tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than a year old, is", "'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a", "tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and seems to cover the same topics", "twelve questions (two of which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged", "tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and seems", "'courses'\") is less than a year old, is used on only twelve questions", "So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a synonym", "the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that", "no tag description, and seems to cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show", "that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made a synonym of [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show", "[courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than a year old, is used", "on only twelve questions (two of which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show", "questions (two of which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")),", "which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag", "\"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and seems to cover the", "tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\").", "[courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is", "tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions", "less than a year old, is used on only twelve questions (two of", "tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than a", "cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest", "[coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and seems to cover", "is less than a year old, is used on only twelve questions (two", "has no tag description, and seems to cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework", "distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged", "but distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\") and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions", "as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions", "questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be", "is used on only twelve questions (two of which are also tagged with", "with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and seems to", "and [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\")", "tagged 'courses'\") is less than a year old, is used on only twelve", "topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show", "than a year old, is used on only twelve questions (two of which", "year old, is used on only twelve questions (two of which are also", "seems to cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So,", "\"show questions tagged 'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less", "used on only twelve questions (two of which are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework", "questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description, and seems to cover the same", "same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses", "'courses'\"). The tag [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") is less than a year", "tagged 'coursework'\"). So, I suggest that [courses](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/courses \"show questions tagged 'courses'\") be made", "I noticed two very similar but distinct tags — [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged", "tag description, and seems to cover the same topics as [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions", "are also tagged with [coursework](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/coursework \"show questions tagged 'coursework'\")), has no tag description," ]
[ "(2) focused on tenured professors at research universities. Not all professors (ranked or", "focused on tenured professors at research universities. Not all professors (ranked or adjunct)", "and (2) focused on tenured professors at research universities. Not all professors (ranked", "to other tags, which I have since learned do not belong in tag", "the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries related to", "include research, teaching, and service. > > > I have made the edit.", "their respective disciplines. The description is even less accurate for (most) community college", "teach are experts in their respective disciplines. The description is even less accurate", "tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries related to professors,", "[assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here is an improved definition,", "I noticed that the definition of the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\")", "their respective discipline. > > > I don't really like this definition because", "> > Queries relating to professors, academic staff members whose job responsibilities may", "members whose job responsibilities may include research, teaching, and service. > > >", "accurate for (most) community college professors. While I know I could edit the", "See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here is an", "I don't really like this definition because it seems to be (1) aggrandizing", "is a draft of an alternative definition: > > Queries relating to professors,", "Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching],", "research universities. Not all professors (ranked or adjunct) at the liberal arts college", "a starting point for discussion, here is a draft of an alternative definition:", "for discussion, here is a draft of an alternative definition: > > Queries", "to professors, academic staff members whose job responsibilities may include research, teaching, and", "tag usage guidance: > > Queries relating to professors, academic staff members whose", "> > > Update Here is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic", "in tag usage guidance: > > Queries relating to professors, academic staff members", "an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing", "include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > >", "also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here is an improved", "I could edit the tag myself, it seemed worth consulting the community for", "less accurate for (most) community college professors. While I know I could edit", "highly accomplished and recognized academic and an expert in their respective discipline. >", "Here is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment)", "are experts in their respective disciplines. The description is even less accurate for", "may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. >", "job responsibilities may include research, teaching, and service. > > > I have", "recognized academic and an expert in their respective discipline. > > > I", "like this definition because it seems to be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused", "in their respective disciplines. The description is even less accurate for (most) community", "such an important tag. As a starting point for discussion, here is a", "whose job responsibilities may include research, teaching, and service. > > > I", "> > I don't really like this definition because it seems to be", "to professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities].", "consulting the community for such an important tag. As a starting point for", "Queries relating to professors, academic staff members whose job responsibilities may include research,", "@Anyon's comment) and removing references to other tags, which I have since learned", "job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and", "since learned do not belong in tag usage guidance: > > Queries relating", "professors, a highly accomplished and recognized academic and an expert in their respective", "(1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured professors at research universities. Not all", "disciplines. The description is even less accurate for (most) community college professors. While", "really like this definition because it seems to be (1) aggrandizing and (2)", "professors. While I know I could edit the tag myself, it seemed worth", "and an expert in their respective discipline. > > > I don't really", "important tag. As a starting point for discussion, here is a draft of", "learned do not belong in tag usage guidance: > > Queries relating to", "\"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries related to professors, a highly", "staff members whose job responsibilities may include research, teaching, and service. > >", "universities. Not all professors (ranked or adjunct) at the liberal arts college at", "academic and an expert in their respective discipline. > > > I don't", "[research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > >", "the tag myself, it seemed worth consulting the community for such an important", "the community for such an important tag. As a starting point for discussion,", "definition: > > Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities may", "tags, which I have since learned do not belong in tag usage guidance:", "'professors'\") is: > > Queries related to professors, a highly accomplished and recognized", "have since learned do not belong in tag usage guidance: > > Queries", "could edit the tag myself, it seemed worth consulting the community for such", "tenured professors at research universities. Not all professors (ranked or adjunct) at the", "noticed that the definition of the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is:", "members whose job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor],", "professors, academic staff members whose job responsibilities may include research, teaching, and service.", "relating to professors, academic staff members whose job responsibilities may include research, teaching,", "Update Here is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's", "related to professors, a highly accomplished and recognized academic and an expert in", "even less accurate for (most) community college professors. While I know I could", "academic staff members whose job responsibilities may include research, teaching, and service. >", "respective disciplines. The description is even less accurate for (most) community college professors.", "at which I teach are experts in their respective disciplines. The description is", "accomplished and recognized academic and an expert in their respective discipline. > >", "draft of an alternative definition: > > Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members", "in their respective discipline. > > > I don't really like this definition", "As a starting point for discussion, here is a draft of an alternative", "> > Update Here is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\"", "and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here", "professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See", "usage guidance: > > Queries relating to professors, academic staff members whose job", "is even less accurate for (most) community college professors. While I know I", "here is a draft of an alternative definition: > > Queries relating to", "which I have since learned do not belong in tag usage guidance: >", "The description is even less accurate for (most) community college professors. While I", "removing references to other tags, which I have since learned do not belong", "I have since learned do not belong in tag usage guidance: > >", "whose job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor],", "replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing references to other", "(ranked or adjunct) at the liberal arts college at which I teach are", "on tenured professors at research universities. Not all professors (ranked or adjunct) at", "While I know I could edit the tag myself, it seemed worth consulting", "tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries related to professors, a highly accomplished and", "an alternative definition: > > Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members whose job", "it seems to be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured professors at", "community for such an important tag. As a starting point for discussion, here", "> I don't really like this definition because it seems to be (1)", "arts college at which I teach are experts in their respective disciplines. The", "aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured professors at research universities. Not all professors", "guidance: > > Queries relating to professors, academic staff members whose job responsibilities", "expert in their respective discipline. > > > I don't really like this", "don't really like this definition because it seems to be (1) aggrandizing and", "[associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here is an improved definition, replacing", "responsibilities may include research, teaching, and service. > > > I have made", "not belong in tag usage guidance: > > Queries relating to professors, academic", "for such an important tag. As a starting point for discussion, here is", "[professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries related to professors, a", "a draft of an alternative definition: > > Queries relating to professors, [faculty]", "> Queries relating to professors, academic staff members whose job responsibilities may include", "tag myself, it seemed worth consulting the community for such an important tag.", "> Update Here is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per", "worth consulting the community for such an important tag. As a starting point", "\"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing references to other tags,", "is: > > Queries related to professors, a highly accomplished and recognized academic", "description is even less accurate for (most) community college professors. While I know", "an important tag. As a starting point for discussion, here is a draft", "responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus].", "definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing references to", "(most) community college professors. While I know I could edit the tag myself,", "> Queries related to professors, a highly accomplished and recognized academic and an", "which I teach are experts in their respective disciplines. The description is even", "community college professors. While I know I could edit the tag myself, it", "Not all professors (ranked or adjunct) at the liberal arts college at which", "other tags, which I have since learned do not belong in tag usage", "with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing references to other tags, which", "and removing references to other tags, which I have since learned do not", "of the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries related", "to be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured professors at research universities.", "at research universities. Not all professors (ranked or adjunct) at the liberal arts", "discussion, here is a draft of an alternative definition: > > Queries relating", "staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing references to other tags, which I have", "I know I could edit the tag myself, it seemed worth consulting the", "the liberal arts college at which I teach are experts in their respective", "[service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here is", "may include research, teaching, and service. > > > I have made the", "edit the tag myself, it seemed worth consulting the community for such an", "experts in their respective disciplines. The description is even less accurate for (most)", "definition of the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries", "Queries related to professors, a highly accomplished and recognized academic and an expert", "because it seems to be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured professors", "\"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing references to other tags, which I", "liberal arts college at which I teach are experts in their respective disciplines.", "(per @Anyon's comment) and removing references to other tags, which I have since", "relating to professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and", "questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > > Queries related to professors, a highly accomplished", "and recognized academic and an expert in their respective discipline. > > >", "[faculty] members whose job responsibilities may include [research], [teaching], and [service-activities]. See also", "improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and removing references", "or adjunct) at the liberal arts college at which I teach are experts", "for (most) community college professors. While I know I could edit the tag", "to professors, a highly accomplished and recognized academic and an expert in their", "is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with \"academic staff\" (per @Anyon's comment) and", "alternative definition: > > Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities", "adjunct) at the liberal arts college at which I teach are experts in", "professors at research universities. Not all professors (ranked or adjunct) at the liberal", "college at which I teach are experts in their respective disciplines. The description", "professors (ranked or adjunct) at the liberal arts college at which I teach", "know I could edit the tag myself, it seemed worth consulting the community", "respective discipline. > > > I don't really like this definition because it", "of an alternative definition: > > Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members whose", "seemed worth consulting the community for such an important tag. As a starting", "tag. As a starting point for discussion, here is a draft of an", "be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured professors at research universities. Not", "college professors. While I know I could edit the tag myself, it seemed", "> Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities may include [research],", "> > Queries related to professors, a highly accomplished and recognized academic and", "all professors (ranked or adjunct) at the liberal arts college at which I", "myself, it seemed worth consulting the community for such an important tag. As", "comment) and removing references to other tags, which I have since learned do", "definition because it seems to be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured", "that the definition of the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: >", "> > > I don't really like this definition because it seems to", "a highly accomplished and recognized academic and an expert in their respective discipline.", "an expert in their respective discipline. > > > I don't really like", "at the liberal arts college at which I teach are experts in their", "starting point for discussion, here is a draft of an alternative definition: >", "[teaching], and [service-activities]. See also [assistant-professor], [associate-professor], and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update", "[professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\" with", "> > Queries relating to professors, [faculty] members whose job responsibilities may include", "discipline. > > > I don't really like this definition because it seems", "and [professor-emeritus]. > > > Update Here is an improved definition, replacing \"faculty\"", "references to other tags, which I have since learned do not belong in", "belong in tag usage guidance: > > Queries relating to professors, academic staff", "it seemed worth consulting the community for such an important tag. As a", "this definition because it seems to be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on", "I teach are experts in their respective disciplines. The description is even less", "do not belong in tag usage guidance: > > Queries relating to professors,", "point for discussion, here is a draft of an alternative definition: > >", "seems to be (1) aggrandizing and (2) focused on tenured professors at research", "the definition of the tag [professors](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/professors \"show questions tagged 'professors'\") is: > >" ]
[ "be able to answer, simply because it isn't related to a specialty or", "I guess also, because the earlier an answer is posted, the more people", "especially true for \"easy to answer\" questions, that is answers that a lot", "guess also, because the earlier an answer is posted, the more people will", "give newer users (who might not visit the site as frequently) the chance", "require only one answer and subsequent users will not want to post an", "that a lot of questions get answered very fast (within an hour of", "users with high and very high reputation, often resulting in them having the", "simply because it isn't related to a specialty or to the inner workings", "those kind of questions that are easier to contribute to, to give newer", "only answer — because some questions require only one answer and subsequent users", "to wait a bit longer when answering those kind of questions that are", "it in the end. This is especially true for \"easy to answer\" questions,", "to answer, simply because it isn't related to a specialty or to the", "This is especially true for \"easy to answer\" questions, that is answers that", "offend those veteran users or to disrespect their often brilliant and helpful insight.", "question) by what I would call veteran users with high and very high", "also, because the earlier an answer is posted, the more people will read", "community. This question is by no means intended to offend those veteran users", "is the following: I have noticed that a lot of questions get answered", "following: I have noticed that a lot of questions get answered very fast", "are easier to contribute to, to give newer users (who might not visit", "is posted, the more people will read it in the end. This is", "workings of a specific institution or country. These questions might be answered competently", "highest voted or even only answer — because some questions require only one", "one, or I guess also, because the earlier an answer is posted, the", "to give newer users (who might not visit the site as frequently) the", "to a specialty or to the inner workings of a specific institution or", "it isn't related to a specialty or to the inner workings of a", "need the reputation boost that a well received answer might bring anymore) to", "in turn earn reputation that will enable them to act and interact more", "often resulting in them having the highest voted or even only answer —", "one answer and subsequent users will not want to post an identical one,", "in them having the highest voted or even only answer — because some", "a specialty or to the inner workings of a specific institution or country.", "ones), and I wonder if it would not be fair for veteran users", "intended to offend those veteran users or to disrespect their often brilliant and", "My issue is the following: I have noticed that a lot of questions", "want to post an identical one, or I guess also, because the earlier", "in the end. This is especially true for \"easy to answer\" questions, that", "received answer might bring anymore) to wait a bit longer when answering those", "the more people will read it in the end. This is especially true", "inner workings of a specific institution or country. These questions might be answered", "that a well received answer might bring anymore) to wait a bit longer", "bit longer when answering those kind of questions that are easier to contribute", "frequently) the chance to answer first and in turn earn reputation that will", "to Academia SE and have found it to be a great resource and", "subsequent users will not want to post an identical one, or I guess", "act and interact more with the site, growing the community. This question is", "only one answer and subsequent users will not want to post an identical", "answer is posted, the more people will read it in the end. This", "interact more with the site, growing the community. This question is by no", "people will read it in the end. This is especially true for \"easy", "by what I would call veteran users with high and very high reputation,", "few users (also new ones), and I wonder if it would not be", "will enable them to act and interact more with the site, growing the", "posted, the more people will read it in the end. This is especially", "having the highest voted or even only answer — because some questions require", "to, to give newer users (who might not visit the site as frequently)", "competently by quite a few users (also new ones), and I wonder if", "boost that a well received answer might bring anymore) to wait a bit", "some questions require only one answer and subsequent users will not want to", "growing the community. This question is by no means intended to offend those", "and I wonder if it would not be fair for veteran users (who", "resource and a nice and respectful community. My issue is the following: I", "with the site, growing the community. This question is by no means intended", "even only answer — because some questions require only one answer and subsequent", "the following: I have noticed that a lot of questions get answered very", "or to the inner workings of a specific institution or country. These questions", "an hour of posting the question) by what I would call veteran users", "means intended to offend those veteran users or to disrespect their often brilliant", "or I guess also, because the earlier an answer is posted, the more", "the highest voted or even only answer — because some questions require only", "the end. This is especially true for \"easy to answer\" questions, that is", "great resource and a nice and respectful community. My issue is the following:", "users (also new ones), and I wonder if it would not be fair", "newer users (who might not visit the site as frequently) the chance to", "chance to answer first and in turn earn reputation that will enable them", "would call veteran users with high and very high reputation, often resulting in", "community. My issue is the following: I have noticed that a lot of", "a bit longer when answering those kind of questions that are easier to", "the chance to answer first and in turn earn reputation that will enable", "it would not be fair for veteran users (who don't really need the", "bring anymore) to wait a bit longer when answering those kind of questions", "specialty or to the inner workings of a specific institution or country. These", "to act and interact more with the site, growing the community. This question", "— because some questions require only one answer and subsequent users will not", "with high and very high reputation, often resulting in them having the highest", "is especially true for \"easy to answer\" questions, that is answers that a", "reputation, often resulting in them having the highest voted or even only answer", "the site, growing the community. This question is by no means intended to", "is answers that a lot of people might be able to answer, simply", "a specific institution or country. These questions might be answered competently by quite", "respectful community. My issue is the following: I have noticed that a lot", "reputation boost that a well received answer might bring anymore) to wait a", "high and very high reputation, often resulting in them having the highest voted", "identical one, or I guess also, because the earlier an answer is posted,", "hour of posting the question) by what I would call veteran users with", "them to act and interact more with the site, growing the community. This", "and have found it to be a great resource and a nice and", "issue is the following: I have noticed that a lot of questions get", "(within an hour of posting the question) by what I would call veteran", "SE and have found it to be a great resource and a nice", "institution or country. These questions might be answered competently by quite a few", "have noticed that a lot of questions get answered very fast (within an", "the reputation boost that a well received answer might bring anymore) to wait", "fair for veteran users (who don't really need the reputation boost that a", "them having the highest voted or even only answer — because some questions", "site as frequently) the chance to answer first and in turn earn reputation", "answer first and in turn earn reputation that will enable them to act", "first and in turn earn reputation that will enable them to act and", "lot of questions get answered very fast (within an hour of posting the", "answered competently by quite a few users (also new ones), and I wonder", "a lot of questions get answered very fast (within an hour of posting", "noticed that a lot of questions get answered very fast (within an hour", "that are easier to contribute to, to give newer users (who might not", "resulting in them having the highest voted or even only answer — because", "because the earlier an answer is posted, the more people will read it", "found it to be a great resource and a nice and respectful community.", "for \"easy to answer\" questions, that is answers that a lot of people", "well received answer might bring anymore) to wait a bit longer when answering", "will read it in the end. This is especially true for \"easy to", "I would call veteran users with high and very high reputation, often resulting", "the inner workings of a specific institution or country. These questions might be", "really need the reputation boost that a well received answer might bring anymore)", "it to be a great resource and a nice and respectful community. My", "be fair for veteran users (who don't really need the reputation boost that", "able to answer, simply because it isn't related to a specialty or to", "not visit the site as frequently) the chance to answer first and in", "or even only answer — because some questions require only one answer and", "contribute to, to give newer users (who might not visit the site as", "I wonder if it would not be fair for veteran users (who don't", "am fairly new to Academia SE and have found it to be a", "\"easy to answer\" questions, that is answers that a lot of people might", "true for \"easy to answer\" questions, that is answers that a lot of", "would not be fair for veteran users (who don't really need the reputation", "wait a bit longer when answering those kind of questions that are easier", "to be a great resource and a nice and respectful community. My issue", "questions require only one answer and subsequent users will not want to post", "related to a specialty or to the inner workings of a specific institution", "These questions might be answered competently by quite a few users (also new", "of questions get answered very fast (within an hour of posting the question)", "fast (within an hour of posting the question) by what I would call", "very high reputation, often resulting in them having the highest voted or even", "(also new ones), and I wonder if it would not be fair for", "new ones), and I wonder if it would not be fair for veteran", "easier to contribute to, to give newer users (who might not visit the", "wonder if it would not be fair for veteran users (who don't really", "longer when answering those kind of questions that are easier to contribute to,", "kind of questions that are easier to contribute to, to give newer users", "not be fair for veteran users (who don't really need the reputation boost", "by no means intended to offend those veteran users or to disrespect their", "voted or even only answer — because some questions require only one answer", "lot of people might be able to answer, simply because it isn't related", "have found it to be a great resource and a nice and respectful", "a great resource and a nice and respectful community. My issue is the", "answered very fast (within an hour of posting the question) by what I", "the earlier an answer is posted, the more people will read it in", "questions, that is answers that a lot of people might be able to", "reputation that will enable them to act and interact more with the site,", "veteran users with high and very high reputation, often resulting in them having", "might not visit the site as frequently) the chance to answer first and", "a lot of people might be able to answer, simply because it isn't", "more people will read it in the end. This is especially true for", "quite a few users (also new ones), and I wonder if it would", "for veteran users (who don't really need the reputation boost that a well", "and respectful community. My issue is the following: I have noticed that a", "(who don't really need the reputation boost that a well received answer might", "of questions that are easier to contribute to, to give newer users (who", "because it isn't related to a specialty or to the inner workings of", "a well received answer might bring anymore) to wait a bit longer when", "high reputation, often resulting in them having the highest voted or even only", "very fast (within an hour of posting the question) by what I would", "the question) by what I would call veteran users with high and very", "not want to post an identical one, or I guess also, because the", "to post an identical one, or I guess also, because the earlier an", "posting the question) by what I would call veteran users with high and", "to answer\" questions, that is answers that a lot of people might be", "that is answers that a lot of people might be able to answer,", "questions that are easier to contribute to, to give newer users (who might", "the site as frequently) the chance to answer first and in turn earn", "nice and respectful community. My issue is the following: I have noticed that", "is by no means intended to offend those veteran users or to disrespect", "read it in the end. This is especially true for \"easy to answer\"", "This question is by no means intended to offend those veteran users or", "earlier an answer is posted, the more people will read it in the", "and interact more with the site, growing the community. This question is by", "end. This is especially true for \"easy to answer\" questions, that is answers", "or country. These questions might be answered competently by quite a few users", "an answer is posted, the more people will read it in the end.", "earn reputation that will enable them to act and interact more with the", "will not want to post an identical one, or I guess also, because", "users (who don't really need the reputation boost that a well received answer", "questions might be answered competently by quite a few users (also new ones),", "that will enable them to act and interact more with the site, growing", "because some questions require only one answer and subsequent users will not want", "that a lot of people might be able to answer, simply because it", "might be answered competently by quite a few users (also new ones), and", "if it would not be fair for veteran users (who don't really need", "answering those kind of questions that are easier to contribute to, to give", "specific institution or country. These questions might be answered competently by quite a", "users (who might not visit the site as frequently) the chance to answer", "don't really need the reputation boost that a well received answer might bring", "I am fairly new to Academia SE and have found it to be", "might bring anymore) to wait a bit longer when answering those kind of", "Academia SE and have found it to be a great resource and a", "visit the site as frequently) the chance to answer first and in turn", "the community. This question is by no means intended to offend those veteran", "new to Academia SE and have found it to be a great resource", "post an identical one, or I guess also, because the earlier an answer", "veteran users (who don't really need the reputation boost that a well received", "be answered competently by quite a few users (also new ones), and I", "call veteran users with high and very high reputation, often resulting in them", "of posting the question) by what I would call veteran users with high", "an identical one, or I guess also, because the earlier an answer is", "as frequently) the chance to answer first and in turn earn reputation that", "anymore) to wait a bit longer when answering those kind of questions that", "what I would call veteran users with high and very high reputation, often", "questions get answered very fast (within an hour of posting the question) by", "be a great resource and a nice and respectful community. My issue is", "isn't related to a specialty or to the inner workings of a specific", "when answering those kind of questions that are easier to contribute to, to", "question is by no means intended to offend those veteran users or to", "answer and subsequent users will not want to post an identical one, or", "country. These questions might be answered competently by quite a few users (also", "answers that a lot of people might be able to answer, simply because", "answer\" questions, that is answers that a lot of people might be able", "a few users (also new ones), and I wonder if it would not", "and subsequent users will not want to post an identical one, or I", "answer might bring anymore) to wait a bit longer when answering those kind", "users will not want to post an identical one, or I guess also,", "to contribute to, to give newer users (who might not visit the site", "and in turn earn reputation that will enable them to act and interact", "might be able to answer, simply because it isn't related to a specialty", "by quite a few users (also new ones), and I wonder if it", "no means intended to offend those veteran users or to disrespect their often", "and very high reputation, often resulting in them having the highest voted or", "of a specific institution or country. These questions might be answered competently by", "enable them to act and interact more with the site, growing the community.", "to the inner workings of a specific institution or country. These questions might", "to answer first and in turn earn reputation that will enable them to", "fairly new to Academia SE and have found it to be a great", "to offend those veteran users or to disrespect their often brilliant and helpful", "of people might be able to answer, simply because it isn't related to", "answer, simply because it isn't related to a specialty or to the inner", "more with the site, growing the community. This question is by no means", "I have noticed that a lot of questions get answered very fast (within", "site, growing the community. This question is by no means intended to offend", "and a nice and respectful community. My issue is the following: I have", "(who might not visit the site as frequently) the chance to answer first", "get answered very fast (within an hour of posting the question) by what", "a nice and respectful community. My issue is the following: I have noticed", "turn earn reputation that will enable them to act and interact more with", "people might be able to answer, simply because it isn't related to a", "answer — because some questions require only one answer and subsequent users will" ]
[ "from an external user and try to improve in this area. (Important: please", "simply states an opinion. > > > My opinion is that this strikes", "But I think that we should reflect on this feedback from an external", "not so well documented. And we are clearly not the only SE site", "talking points in different ways; it is telling that the answers almost never", "have a correct answer, and the answers, well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE", "that are not so well documented. And we are clearly not the only", "we are clearly not the only SE site with this concern; for instance,", "> > The problem with academia.SE is that it is very different in", "feedback from an external user and try to improve in this area. (Important:", "are well-defined enough to have a correct answer, and the answers, well, attempt", "in style from MO and other SE sites. The paradigm of SE is", "disregard these good practices on subjective topics, and do not worry about making", "a correct answer, and the answers, well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is", "and answers where it is difficult or impossible to give a reference. SE", "about making our answers as data- and experience-backed as it would be possible,", "academia.SE is that it is very different in style from MO and other", "in many cases. Looking back at my post history I am myself guilty", "with the opinions expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted answer is quite short", "guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers where it is", "I am myself guilty multiple times of this sin, so I do not", "and downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult to get constructive criticism", "some advice on [good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these", "provide it. Academia.SE is more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well", "an area where we need to improve. I don't mean to strike down", "the rest of the community. But I think that we should reflect on", "topics, and do not worry about making our answers as data- and experience-backed", "concern; for instance, I would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions", "answer --- it is difficult to get constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement", "discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to", "well documented. And we are clearly not the only SE site with this", "we need to improve. I don't mean to strike down on subjective answers", "they share experiences over opinions, and are backed up with facts and references", "and simply states an opinion. > > > My opinion is that this", "an expert\". It seems to me that we often disregard these good practices", "clearly not the only SE site with this concern; for instance, I would", "data- and experience-backed as it would be possible, in many cases. Looking back", "advice on [good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers", "that these answers become a lot better if they share experiences over opinions,", "answers can still have a positive role, when they identify good practices or", "be possible, in many cases. Looking back at my post history I am", "more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions flourish. Popular", "SE is that the questions are well-defined enough to have a correct answer,", "get constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement if we mass-downvote those who provide", "answers where it is difficult or impossible to give a reference. SE has", "to get constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement if we mass-downvote those who", "on this feedback from an external user and try to improve in this", "> The problem with academia.SE is that it is very different in style", "or impossible to give a reference. SE has some advice on [good subjective", "guilty multiple times of this sin, so I do not claim to be", "is difficult or impossible to give a reference. SE has some advice on", "answers get upvoted not because they offer any useful insight, but because the", "this feedback from an external user and try to improve in this area.", "some attention, in my view: > > The problem with academia.SE is that", "the answers, well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is more of a discussion", "non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to have many answers repeating various talking points", "can still have a positive role, when they identify good practices or suggestions,", "attention, in my view: > > The problem with academia.SE is that it", "areas that are not so well documented. And we are clearly not the", "think that we should reflect on this feedback from an external user and", "is difficult to get constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement if we mass-downvote", "so I do not claim to be better than the rest of the", "questions and answers where it is difficult or impossible to give a reference.", "various talking points in different ways; it is telling that the answers almost", "because they offer any useful insight, but because the upvoters agree with the", "to be better than the rest of the community. But I think that", "from MO and other SE sites. The paradigm of SE is that the", "these answers become a lot better if they share experiences over opinions, and", "references rather than just \"because I'm an expert\". It seems to me that", "reflect on this feedback from an external user and try to improve in", "that Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult to get constructive criticism and suggestions", "other SE sites. The paradigm of SE is that the questions are well-defined", "upvoters agree with the opinions expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted answer is", "correct answer, and the answers, well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is more", "answers repeating various talking points in different ways; it is telling that the", "The paradigm of SE is that the questions are well-defined enough to have", "subjective topics, and do not worry about making our answers as data- and", "this sin, so I do not claim to be better than the rest", "most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers where it is difficult or", "if they share experiences over opinions, and are backed up with facts and", "problem with academia.SE is that it is very different in style from MO", "difficult or impossible to give a reference. SE has some advice on [good", "strikes an open wound and identifies an area where we need to improve.", "not the only SE site with this concern; for instance, I would guess", "on subjective topics, and do not worry about making our answers as data-", "my post history I am myself guilty multiple times of this sin, so", "subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can still have a positive role, when they", "do not go and downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult to", "very different in style from MO and other SE sites. The paradigm of", "it would be possible, in many cases. Looking back at my post history", "or suggestions, or are in areas that are not so well documented. And", "is quite short and simply states an opinion. > > > My opinion", "possible, in many cases. Looking back at my post history I am myself", "as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to have many answers repeating various talking", "--- it is difficult to get constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement if", "as it would be possible, in many cases. Looking back at my post", "quite short and simply states an opinion. > > > My opinion is", "identify good practices or suggestions, or are in areas that are not so", "has some advice on [good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that", "I'm an expert\". It seems to me that we often disregard these good", "questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers become a lot better if they share", "Popular questions tend to have many answers repeating various talking points in different", "upvoted answer is quite short and simply states an opinion. > > >", "are not so well documented. And we are clearly not the only SE", "give a reference. SE has some advice on [good subjective and bad subjective", "and suggests that these answers become a lot better if they share experiences", "The problem with academia.SE is that it is very different in style from", "would be possible, in many cases. Looking back at my post history I", "SE sites. The paradigm of SE is that the questions are well-defined enough", "an external user and try to improve in this area. (Important: please do", "we should reflect on this feedback from an external user and try to", "on [good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers become", "The answers get upvoted not because they offer any useful insight, but because", "overall. Subjective answers can still have a positive role, when they identify good", "not claim to be better than the rest of the community. But I", "our answers as data- and experience-backed as it would be possible, in many", "this concern; for instance, I would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective", "good practices or suggestions, or are in areas that are not so well", "answers as data- and experience-backed as it would be possible, in many cases.", "and identifies an area where we need to improve. I don't mean to", "and try to improve in this area. (Important: please do not go and", "offer any useful insight, but because the upvoters agree with the opinions expressed", "reference. SE has some advice on [good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and", "become a lot better if they share experiences over opinions, and are backed", "any references/citations. The answers get upvoted not because they offer any useful insight,", "than the rest of the community. But I think that we should reflect", "almost never have any references/citations. The answers get upvoted not because they offer", "with this concern; for instance, I would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is", "answers become a lot better if they share experiences over opinions, and are", "cases. Looking back at my post history I am myself guilty multiple times", "Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult to get constructive criticism and suggestions for", "that this strikes an open wound and identifies an area where we need", "SE site with this concern; for instance, I would guess that most of", "times of this sin, so I do not claim to be better than", "of SE is that the questions are well-defined enough to have a correct", "answers overall. Subjective answers can still have a positive role, when they identify", "well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to have many answers repeating various", "that it is very different in style from MO and other SE sites.", "to improve. I don't mean to strike down on subjective answers overall. Subjective", "external user and try to improve in this area. (Important: please do not", "area where we need to improve. I don't mean to strike down on", "well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based", "opinions, and are backed up with facts and references rather than just \"because", "for instance, I would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and", "do not claim to be better than the rest of the community. But", "Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers where it is difficult or impossible to", "go and downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult to get constructive", "downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult to get constructive criticism and", "an opinion. > > > My opinion is that this strikes an open", "try to improve in this area. (Important: please do not go and downvote", "on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can still have a positive role, when", "repeating various talking points in different ways; it is telling that the answers", "only SE site with this concern; for instance, I would guess that most", "the questions are well-defined enough to have a correct answer, and the answers,", "constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement if we mass-downvote those who provide them.)", "different in style from MO and other SE sites. The paradigm of SE", "of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers where it is difficult or impossible", "don't mean to strike down on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can still", "in this area. (Important: please do not go and downvote that Meta.MO answer", "it. Academia.SE is more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as", "the answers almost never have any references/citations. The answers get upvoted not because", "points in different ways; it is telling that the answers almost never have", "have a positive role, when they identify good practices or suggestions, or are", "community. But I think that we should reflect on this feedback from an", "often disregard these good practices on subjective topics, and do not worry about", "backed up with facts and references rather than just \"because I'm an expert\".", "of the community. But I think that we should reflect on this feedback", "upvoted not because they offer any useful insight, but because the upvoters agree", "in areas that are not so well documented. And we are clearly not", "critical answer](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/a/5056/1898) on Academia.SE from Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in my view: >", "(Important: please do not go and downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it is", "claim to be better than the rest of the community. But I think", "role, when they identify good practices or suggestions, or are in areas that", "answers almost never have any references/citations. The answers get upvoted not because they", "an open wound and identifies an area where we need to improve. I", "where it is difficult or impossible to give a reference. SE has some", "My opinion is that this strikes an open wound and identifies an area", "are in areas that are not so well documented. And we are clearly", "is that it is very different in style from MO and other SE", "as well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to have many answers repeating", "than just \"because I'm an expert\". It seems to me that we often", "this area. (Important: please do not go and downvote that Meta.MO answer ---", "the only SE site with this concern; for instance, I would guess that", "improve in this area. (Important: please do not go and downvote that Meta.MO", "is telling that the answers almost never have any references/citations. The answers get", "or are in areas that are not so well documented. And we are", "the highest upvoted answer is quite short and simply states an opinion. >", "many cases. Looking back at my post history I am myself guilty multiple", "questions, as well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to have many answers", "area. (Important: please do not go and downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it", "states an opinion. > > > My opinion is that this strikes an", "strike down on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can still have a positive", "rather than just \"because I'm an expert\". It seems to me that we", "suggestions, or are in areas that are not so well documented. And we", "get upvoted not because they offer any useful insight, but because the upvoters", "subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers become a lot better if they", "style from MO and other SE sites. The paradigm of SE is that", "they offer any useful insight, but because the upvoters agree with the opinions", "at my post history I am myself guilty multiple times of this sin,", "> > My opinion is that this strikes an open wound and identifies", "where we need to improve. I don't mean to strike down on subjective", "should reflect on this feedback from an external user and try to improve", "MO and other SE sites. The paradigm of SE is that the questions", "identifies an area where we need to improve. I don't mean to strike", "questions are well-defined enough to have a correct answer, and the answers, well,", "Academia.SE from Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in my view: > > The problem", "so well documented. And we are clearly not the only SE site with", "deserves some attention, in my view: > > The problem with academia.SE is", "it is very different in style from MO and other SE sites. The", "documented. And we are clearly not the only SE site with this concern;", "references/citations. The answers get upvoted not because they offer any useful insight, but", "have many answers repeating various talking points in different ways; it is telling", "of this sin, so I do not claim to be better than the", "not go and downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult to get", "bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers become a lot better if", "back at my post history I am myself guilty multiple times of this", "tend to have many answers repeating various talking points in different ways; it", "different ways; it is telling that the answers almost never have any references/citations.", "and the answers, well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is more of a", "not because they offer any useful insight, but because the upvoters agree with", "and experience-backed as it would be possible, in many cases. Looking back at", "in my view: > > The problem with academia.SE is that it is", "would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers where it", "seems to me that we often disregard these good practices on subjective topics,", "but because the upvoters agree with the opinions expressed there. Often, the highest", "expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted answer is quite short and simply states", "and references rather than just \"because I'm an expert\". It seems to me", "are backed up with facts and references rather than just \"because I'm an", "opinion. > > > My opinion is that this strikes an open wound", "subjective questions and answers where it is difficult or impossible to give a", "better if they share experiences over opinions, and are backed up with facts", "they identify good practices or suggestions, or are in areas that are not", "experience-backed as it would be possible, in many cases. Looking back at my", "have any references/citations. The answers get upvoted not because they offer any useful", "answer](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/a/5056/1898) on Academia.SE from Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in my view: > >", "share experiences over opinions, and are backed up with facts and references rather", "Often, the highest upvoted answer is quite short and simply states an opinion.", "[This critical answer](https://meta.mathoverflow.net/a/5056/1898) on Academia.SE from Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in my view:", "is that this strikes an open wound and identifies an area where we", "when they identify good practices or suggestions, or are in areas that are", "answer is quite short and simply states an opinion. > > > My", "any useful insight, but because the upvoters agree with the opinions expressed there.", "insight, but because the upvoters agree with the opinions expressed there. Often, the", "answer, and the answers, well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is more of", "> My opinion is that this strikes an open wound and identifies an", "facts and references rather than just \"because I'm an expert\". It seems to", "agree with the opinions expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted answer is quite", "rest of the community. But I think that we should reflect on this", "[good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers become a", "to provide it. Academia.SE is more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as", "site with this concern; for instance, I would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE", "to have a correct answer, and the answers, well, attempt to provide it.", "the upvoters agree with the opinions expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted answer", "open wound and identifies an area where we need to improve. I don't", "Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to have many", "I would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers where", "questions tend to have many answers repeating various talking points in different ways;", "never have any references/citations. The answers get upvoted not because they offer any", "impossible to give a reference. SE has some advice on [good subjective and", "be better than the rest of the community. But I think that we", "short and simply states an opinion. > > > My opinion is that", "good practices on subjective topics, and do not worry about making our answers", "as data- and experience-backed as it would be possible, in many cases. Looking", "flourish. Popular questions tend to have many answers repeating various talking points in", "instance, I would guess that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers", "enough to have a correct answer, and the answers, well, attempt to provide", "not worry about making our answers as data- and experience-backed as it would", "mean to strike down on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can still have", "over opinions, and are backed up with facts and references rather than just", "in different ways; it is telling that the answers almost never have any", "opinions expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted answer is quite short and simply", "useful insight, but because the upvoters agree with the opinions expressed there. Often,", "\"because I'm an expert\". It seems to me that we often disregard these", "a reference. SE has some advice on [good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/),", "experiences over opinions, and are backed up with facts and references rather than", "do not worry about making our answers as data- and experience-backed as it", "sites. The paradigm of SE is that the questions are well-defined enough to", "difficult to get constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement if we mass-downvote those", "that the answers almost never have any references/citations. The answers get upvoted not", "it is telling that the answers almost never have any references/citations. The answers", "It seems to me that we often disregard these good practices on subjective", "with facts and references rather than just \"because I'm an expert\". It seems", "Looking back at my post history I am myself guilty multiple times of", "paradigm of SE is that the questions are well-defined enough to have a", "practices on subjective topics, and do not worry about making our answers as", "to improve in this area. (Important: please do not go and downvote that", "to have many answers repeating various talking points in different ways; it is", "please do not go and downvote that Meta.MO answer --- it is difficult", "a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend", "multiple times of this sin, so I do not claim to be better", "telling that the answers almost never have any references/citations. The answers get upvoted", "that the questions are well-defined enough to have a correct answer, and the", "post history I am myself guilty multiple times of this sin, so I", "to strike down on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can still have a", "with academia.SE is that it is very different in style from MO and", "Subjective answers can still have a positive role, when they identify good practices", "from Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in my view: > > The problem with", "that we often disregard these good practices on subjective topics, and do not", "to me that we often disregard these good practices on subjective topics, and", "ways; it is telling that the answers almost never have any references/citations. The", "and are backed up with facts and references rather than just \"because I'm", "opinion is that this strikes an open wound and identifies an area where", "And we are clearly not the only SE site with this concern; for", "on Academia.SE from Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in my view: > > The", "positive role, when they identify good practices or suggestions, or are in areas", "sin, so I do not claim to be better than the rest of", "view: > > The problem with academia.SE is that it is very different", "better than the rest of the community. But I think that we should", "is more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions flourish.", "attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions,", "because the upvoters agree with the opinions expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted", "suggests that these answers become a lot better if they share experiences over", "is very different in style from MO and other SE sites. The paradigm", "SE has some advice on [good subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests", "it is difficult or impossible to give a reference. SE has some advice", "am myself guilty multiple times of this sin, so I do not claim", "user and try to improve in this area. (Important: please do not go", "this strikes an open wound and identifies an area where we need to", "Academia.SE is more of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions", "is subjective questions and answers where it is difficult or impossible to give", "wound and identifies an area where we need to improve. I don't mean", "and do not worry about making our answers as data- and experience-backed as", "my view: > > The problem with academia.SE is that it is very", "and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers become a lot better", "is that the questions are well-defined enough to have a correct answer, and", "just \"because I'm an expert\". It seems to me that we often disregard", "down on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can still have a positive role,", "history I am myself guilty multiple times of this sin, so I do", "Meta.mathoverflow deserves some attention, in my view: > > The problem with academia.SE", "need to improve. I don't mean to strike down on subjective answers overall.", "a positive role, when they identify good practices or suggestions, or are in", "improve. I don't mean to strike down on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers", "I don't mean to strike down on subjective answers overall. Subjective answers can", "the community. But I think that we should reflect on this feedback from", "we often disregard these good practices on subjective topics, and do not worry", "expert\". It seems to me that we often disregard these good practices on", "these good practices on subjective topics, and do not worry about making our", "and other SE sites. The paradigm of SE is that the questions are", "that we should reflect on this feedback from an external user and try", "me that we often disregard these good practices on subjective topics, and do", "are clearly not the only SE site with this concern; for instance, I", "that most of Interpersonal.SE is subjective questions and answers where it is difficult", "the opinions expressed there. Often, the highest upvoted answer is quite short and", "practices or suggestions, or are in areas that are not so well documented.", "many answers repeating various talking points in different ways; it is telling that", "I think that we should reflect on this feedback from an external user", "forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions tend to have", "there. Often, the highest upvoted answer is quite short and simply states an", "making our answers as data- and experience-backed as it would be possible, in", "of a discussion forum. Opinion-based questions, as well as non-questions flourish. Popular questions", "answers, well, attempt to provide it. Academia.SE is more of a discussion forum.", "a lot better if they share experiences over opinions, and are backed up", "well-defined enough to have a correct answer, and the answers, well, attempt to", "to give a reference. SE has some advice on [good subjective and bad", "still have a positive role, when they identify good practices or suggestions, or", "up with facts and references rather than just \"because I'm an expert\". It", "lot better if they share experiences over opinions, and are backed up with", "myself guilty multiple times of this sin, so I do not claim to", "it is difficult to get constructive criticism and suggestions for improvement if we", "worry about making our answers as data- and experience-backed as it would be", "highest upvoted answer is quite short and simply states an opinion. > >", "I do not claim to be better than the rest of the community.", "> > > My opinion is that this strikes an open wound and", "subjective and bad subjective questions](https://stackoverflow.blog/2010/09/29/good-subjective-bad-subjective/), and suggests that these answers become a lot" ]
[ "account now. Is there a way to dissociate a question from my account", "to my account now. Is there a way to dissociate a question from", "exchange, since I wanted to keep it separate from my personal account. However,", "\"burner\" account to ask a question on this exchange, since I wanted to", "I made a \"burner\" account to ask a question on this exchange, since", "a \"burner\" account to ask a question on this exchange, since I wanted", "since I wanted to keep it separate from my personal account. However, upon", "However, upon completing email verification, it seems to be linked to my account", "a way to dissociate a question from my account after it's been linked?", "wanted to keep it separate from my personal account. However, upon completing email", "from my personal account. However, upon completing email verification, it seems to be", "seems to be linked to my account now. Is there a way to", "email verification, it seems to be linked to my account now. Is there", "question on this exchange, since I wanted to keep it separate from my", "I wanted to keep it separate from my personal account. However, upon completing", "linked to my account now. Is there a way to dissociate a question", "account to ask a question on this exchange, since I wanted to keep", "it separate from my personal account. However, upon completing email verification, it seems", "now. Is there a way to dissociate a question from my account after", "made a \"burner\" account to ask a question on this exchange, since I", "Is there a way to dissociate a question from my account after it's", "completing email verification, it seems to be linked to my account now. Is", "this exchange, since I wanted to keep it separate from my personal account.", "upon completing email verification, it seems to be linked to my account now.", "be linked to my account now. Is there a way to dissociate a", "my account now. Is there a way to dissociate a question from my", "a question on this exchange, since I wanted to keep it separate from", "my personal account. However, upon completing email verification, it seems to be linked", "keep it separate from my personal account. However, upon completing email verification, it", "to ask a question on this exchange, since I wanted to keep it", "it seems to be linked to my account now. Is there a way", "verification, it seems to be linked to my account now. Is there a", "personal account. However, upon completing email verification, it seems to be linked to", "to keep it separate from my personal account. However, upon completing email verification,", "to be linked to my account now. Is there a way to dissociate", "there a way to dissociate a question from my account after it's been", "separate from my personal account. However, upon completing email verification, it seems to", "ask a question on this exchange, since I wanted to keep it separate", "account. However, upon completing email verification, it seems to be linked to my", "on this exchange, since I wanted to keep it separate from my personal" ]
[ "edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the answer writer did effectively assent to the", "response to the OP's question, rather than the argument about research content. The", "The author of the answer has clearly rejected that proposal by reverting the", "a question of what to do about the controversial answer, and per @cag51's", "answer writer does not consent to editing, delete as violating the site's policy", "to respond here and that the direction either be: * Edit to remove", "the scientific specifics is what detracts from the value. This is not the", "the response to the OP's question, rather than the argument about research content.", "of the matter rather than on the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While", "this site to avoid discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to", "remove research content discussion, by the answer writer or with their consent, or", "or * If the answer writer does not consent to editing, delete as", "I believe that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal for improving the answer by", "answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally,", "on the response to the OP's question, rather than the argument about research", "to do about the controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment, I think it", "invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the answer writer did effectively assent to", "While \"frame challenges\" to a question are often appropriate, in this case there", "question of the OP, and that the discussion of the scientific specifics is", "take is to ask the answer writer to respond here and that the", "a question about EUA processes: that would be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/),", "argument about research content. The author of the answer has clearly rejected that", "of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it salvaged, and there is [recent community", "to avoid discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it", "the answer writer or with their consent, or * If the answer writer", "scientific specifics is what detracts from the value. This is not the venue", "and there is [recent community precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that", "EUA processes: that would be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard", "content. The author of the answer has clearly rejected that proposal by reverting", "* Edit to remove research content discussion, by the answer writer or with", "content is actually involved, other than the broad area. Because passions are high", "position taken by the answer author, it is unsurprising that this answer has", "what detracts from the value. This is not the venue for resolving a", "taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of this site to avoid", "edit. I would thus propose that the path to take is to ask", "the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it salvaged, and there is", "improving the answer by focusing it on the response to the OP's question,", "valuable content in the answer where it addresses the actual question of the", "discussion of the scientific specifics is what detracts from the value. This is", "or with their consent, or * If the answer writer does not consent", "it salvaged, and there is [recent community precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733).", "[recent community precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the", "the answer writer did effectively assent to the edit. I would thus propose", "comment, I think it will be useful to bring this to meta for", "discussion. I see three general paths: 1. Edit against the answer authors' wishes", "about EUA processes: that would be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the", "ask the answer writer to respond here and that the direction either be:", "focusing it on the response to the OP's question, rather than the argument", "to a question are often appropriate, in this case there is (deliberately) not", "precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the answer writer", "paths: 1. Edit against the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable", "author of the answer has clearly rejected that proposal by reverting the edit,", "of the answer has clearly rejected that proposal by reverting the edit, however.", "scientific substance of the matter rather than on the question of how to", "I'd like to see it salvaged, and there is [recent community precedent for", "and that the direction either be: * Edit to remove research content discussion,", "appropriate, in this case there is (deliberately) not enough information to know what", "that the discussion of the scientific specifics is what detracts from the value.", "would thus propose that the path to take is to ask the answer", "question of what to do about the controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment,", "involved, other than the broad area. Because passions are high around this subject", "thus propose that the path to take is to ask the answer writer", "about how to respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers", "salvaged, and there is [recent community precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In", "this answer has become highly controversial. I believe that @cag51 made a reasonable", "the answers [dwells on the scientific substance of the matter rather than on", "and per @cag51's comment, I think it will be useful to bring this", "one of the answers [dwells on the scientific substance of the matter rather", "resolving a question about EUA processes: that would be better taken to [Medical", "high around this subject area and due to the specific position taken by", "as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally, I think there is valuable", "specific position taken by the answer author, it is unsurprising that this answer", "by the answer author, it is unsurprising that this answer has become highly", "authors' wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally, I", "that the path to take is to ask the answer writer to respond", "of the OP, and that the discussion of the scientific specifics is what", "question, rather than the argument about research content. The author of the answer", "the specific position taken by the answer author, it is unsurprising that this", "to meta for discussion. I see three general paths: 1. Edit against the", "value. This is not the venue for resolving a question about EUA processes:", "such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the answer writer did effectively", "active question about how to respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of", "see it salvaged, and there is [recent community precedent for such an invasive", "content discussion, by the answer writer or with their consent, or * If", "consent to editing, delete as violating the site's policy on discussion of research", "enough information to know what scientific content is actually involved, other than the", "be useful to bring this to meta for discussion. I see three general", "their consent, or * If the answer writer does not consent to editing,", "with their consent, or * If the answer writer does not consent to", "the controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment, I think it will be useful", "venue for resolving a question about EUA processes: that would be better taken", "would be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of this", "unsurprising that this answer has become highly controversial. I believe that @cag51 made", "Because passions are high around this subject area and due to the specific", "not the venue for resolving a question about EUA processes: that would be", "Edit to remove research content discussion, by the answer writer or with their", "the matter rather than on the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame", "alone Personally, I think there is valuable content in the answer where it", "assent to the edit. I would thus propose that the path to take", "that case, however, the answer writer did effectively assent to the edit. I", "of this site to avoid discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like", "to editing, delete as violating the site's policy on discussion of research content.", "I think there is valuable content in the answer where it addresses the", "around this subject area and due to the specific position taken by the", "like to see it salvaged, and there is [recent community precedent for such", "how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a question are often appropriate, in", "If the answer writer does not consent to editing, delete as violating the", "this subject area and due to the specific position taken by the answer", "for improving the answer by focusing it on the response to the OP's", "there is (deliberately) not enough information to know what scientific content is actually", "community precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the answer", "the answer author, it is unsurprising that this answer has become highly controversial.", "edit, however. The leaves a question of what to do about the controversial", "specifics is what detracts from the value. This is not the venue for", "to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells on the scientific", "against the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it", "it addresses the actual question of the OP, and that the discussion of", "in the answer where it addresses the actual question of the OP, and", "\"frame challenges\" to a question are often appropriate, in this case there is", "OP's question, rather than the argument about research content. The author of the", "will be useful to bring this to meta for discussion. I see three", "answer writer did effectively assent to the edit. I would thus propose that", "that the direction either be: * Edit to remove research content discussion, by", "information to know what scientific content is actually involved, other than the broad", "1. Edit against the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3.", "the venue for resolving a question about EUA processes: that would be better", "not consent to editing, delete as violating the site's policy on discussion of", "be: * Edit to remove research content discussion, by the answer writer or", "it is unsurprising that this answer has become highly controversial. I believe that", "propose that the path to take is to ask the answer writer to", "reasonable proposal for improving the answer by focusing it on the response to", "detracts from the value. This is not the venue for resolving a question", "clearly rejected that proposal by reverting the edit, however. The leaves a question", "of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it salvaged, and there", "this to meta for discussion. I see three general paths: 1. Edit against", "challenges\" to a question are often appropriate, in this case there is (deliberately)", "actual question of the OP, and that the discussion of the scientific specifics", "question are often appropriate, in this case there is (deliberately) not enough information", "3. Leave it alone Personally, I think there is valuable content in the", "there is valuable content in the answer where it addresses the actual question", "than on the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a", "In that case, however, the answer writer did effectively assent to the edit.", "however, the answer writer did effectively assent to the edit. I would thus", "the answer writer to respond here and that the direction either be: ", "highly controversial. I believe that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal for improving the", "I see three general paths: 1. Edit against the answer authors' wishes 2.", "does not consent to editing, delete as violating the site's policy on discussion", "here and that the direction either be: Edit to remove research content", "case there is (deliberately) not enough information to know what scientific content is", "2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally, I think there", "the scientific substance of the matter rather than on the question of how", "is [recent community precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however,", "general paths: 1. Edit against the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as being", "to the edit. I would thus propose that the path to take is", "there is [recent community precedent for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case,", "the direction either be: * Edit to remove research content discussion, by the", "@cag51's comment, I think it will be useful to bring this to meta", "answer has become highly controversial. I believe that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal", "that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal for improving the answer by focusing it", "rejected that proposal by reverting the edit, however. The leaves a question of", "Leave it alone Personally, I think there is valuable content in the answer", "for such an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the answer writer did", "writer did effectively assent to the edit. I would thus propose that the", "is what detracts from the value. This is not the venue for resolving", "being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally, I think there is valuable content", "matter rather than on the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\"", "The leaves a question of what to do about the controversial answer, and", "a question are often appropriate, in this case there is (deliberately) not enough", "it alone Personally, I think there is valuable content in the answer where", "the actual question of the OP, and that the discussion of the scientific", "answer has clearly rejected that proposal by reverting the edit, however. The leaves", "the answer writer does not consent to editing, delete as violating the site's", "it on the response to the OP's question, rather than the argument about", "is not the venue for resolving a question about EUA processes: that would", "about research content. The author of the answer has clearly rejected that proposal", "is (deliberately) not enough information to know what scientific content is actually involved,", "by reverting the edit, however. The leaves a question of what to do", "that would be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of", "three general paths: 1. Edit against the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as", "see three general paths: 1. Edit against the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete", "not enough information to know what scientific content is actually involved, other than", "is actually involved, other than the broad area. Because passions are high around", "to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a question are often appropriate, in this", "In this [highly active question about how to respond to misrepresentation of one's", "the edit, however. The leaves a question of what to do about the", "to remove research content discussion, by the answer writer or with their consent,", "due to the specific position taken by the answer author, it is unsurprising", "This is not the venue for resolving a question about EUA processes: that", "respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells on the", "answers [dwells on the scientific substance of the matter rather than on the", "on the scientific substance of the matter rather than on the question of", "however. The leaves a question of what to do about the controversial answer,", "answer, and per @cag51's comment, I think it will be useful to bring", "Personally, I think there is valuable content in the answer where it addresses", "* If the answer writer does not consent to editing, delete as violating", "Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally, I think there is", "rather than the argument about research content. The author of the answer has", "to know what scientific content is actually involved, other than the broad area.", "writer or with their consent, or * If the answer writer does not", "a reasonable proposal for improving the answer by focusing it on the response", "where it addresses the actual question of the OP, and that the discussion", "broad area. Because passions are high around this subject area and due to", "of what to do about the controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment, I", "question about how to respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the", "I think it will be useful to bring this to meta for discussion.", "controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment, I think it will be useful to", "to the specific position taken by the answer author, it is unsurprising that", "bring this to meta for discussion. I see three general paths: 1. Edit", "become highly controversial. I believe that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal for improving", "by the answer writer or with their consent, or * If the answer", "to the OP's question, rather than the argument about research content. The author", "think there is valuable content in the answer where it addresses the actual", "proposal for improving the answer by focusing it on the response to the", "respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a question are often appropriate, in this case", "writer to respond here and that the direction either be: * Edit to", "from the value. This is not the venue for resolving a question about", "the standard policy of this site to avoid discussion of the [content of", "to take is to ask the answer writer to respond here and that", "consent, or * If the answer writer does not consent to editing, delete", "[dwells on the scientific substance of the matter rather than on the question", "of the answers [dwells on the scientific substance of the matter rather than", "research content discussion, by the answer writer or with their consent, or ", "the OP's question, rather than the argument about research content. The author of", "direction either be: Edit to remove research content discussion, by the answer", "the answer where it addresses the actual question of the OP, and that", "on the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a question", "of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells on the scientific substance of", "research content. The author of the answer has clearly rejected that proposal by", "to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of this site to avoid discussion", "[Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of this site to avoid discussion of", "[content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it salvaged, and there is [recent", "content in the answer where it addresses the actual question of the OP,", "the broad area. Because passions are high around this subject area and due", "wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally, I think", "area and due to the specific position taken by the answer author, it", "what scientific content is actually involved, other than the broad area. Because passions", "has become highly controversial. I believe that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal for", "question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a question are often", "the answer has clearly rejected that proposal by reverting the edit, however. The", "has clearly rejected that proposal by reverting the edit, however. The leaves a", "per the standard policy of this site to avoid discussion of the [content", "it will be useful to bring this to meta for discussion. I see", "this case there is (deliberately) not enough information to know what scientific content", "discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it salvaged, and", "@cag51 made a reasonable proposal for improving the answer by focusing it on", "OP, and that the discussion of the scientific specifics is what detracts from", "made a reasonable proposal for improving the answer by focusing it on the", "reverting the edit, however. The leaves a question of what to do about", "scientific content is actually involved, other than the broad area. Because passions are", "in this case there is (deliberately) not enough information to know what scientific", "other than the broad area. Because passions are high around this subject area", "passions are high around this subject area and due to the specific position", "by focusing it on the response to the OP's question, rather than the", "Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of this site to avoid discussion of the", "the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a question are", "useful to bring this to meta for discussion. I see three general paths:", "case, however, the answer writer did effectively assent to the edit. I would", "the OP, and that the discussion of the scientific specifics is what detracts", "an invasive edit](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4851/22733). In that case, however, the answer writer did effectively assent", "answer by focusing it on the response to the OP's question, rather than", "for discussion. I see three general paths: 1. Edit against the answer authors'", "what to do about the controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment, I think", "proposal by reverting the edit, however. The leaves a question of what to", "answer where it addresses the actual question of the OP, and that the", "of the scientific specifics is what detracts from the value. This is not", "path to take is to ask the answer writer to respond here and", "and due to the specific position taken by the answer author, it is", "respond here and that the direction either be: * Edit to remove research", "the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone", "research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it salvaged, and there is [recent community precedent", "better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of this site to", "how to respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells", "is to ask the answer writer to respond here and that the direction", "to bring this to meta for discussion. I see three general paths: 1.", "the edit. I would thus propose that the path to take is to", "area. Because passions are high around this subject area and due to the", "did effectively assent to the edit. I would thus propose that the path", "the value. This is not the venue for resolving a question about EUA", "one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells on the scientific substance of the", "(deliberately) not enough information to know what scientific content is actually involved, other", "to respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells on", "site to avoid discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see", "standard policy of this site to avoid discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic).", "do about the controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment, I think it will", "is unsurprising that this answer has become highly controversial. I believe that @cag51", "that proposal by reverting the edit, however. The leaves a question of what", "be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy of this site", "Edit against the answer authors' wishes 2. Delete as being unsalvageable 3. Leave", "meta for discussion. I see three general paths: 1. Edit against the answer", "for resolving a question about EUA processes: that would be better taken to", "know what scientific content is actually involved, other than the broad area. Because", "leaves a question of what to do about the controversial answer, and per", "the path to take is to ask the answer writer to respond here", "question about EUA processes: that would be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per", "answer writer or with their consent, or * If the answer writer does", "about the controversial answer, and per @cag51's comment, I think it will be", "answer author, it is unsurprising that this answer has become highly controversial. I", "often appropriate, in this case there is (deliberately) not enough information to know", "to ask the answer writer to respond here and that the direction either", "rather than on the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to", "are often appropriate, in this case there is (deliberately) not enough information to", "to see it salvaged, and there is [recent community precedent for such an", "believe that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal for improving the answer by focusing", "either be: * Edit to remove research content discussion, by the answer writer", "research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells on the scientific substance of the matter", "avoid discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd like to see it salvaged,", "per @cag51's comment, I think it will be useful to bring this to", "[highly active question about how to respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one", "think it will be useful to bring this to meta for discussion. I", "the discussion of the scientific specifics is what detracts from the value. This", "and that the discussion of the scientific specifics is what detracts from the", "that this answer has become highly controversial. I believe that @cag51 made a", "writer does not consent to editing, delete as violating the site's policy on", "than the argument about research content. The author of the answer has clearly", "taken by the answer author, it is unsurprising that this answer has become", "than the broad area. Because passions are high around this subject area and", "the argument about research content. The author of the answer has clearly rejected", "discussion, by the answer writer or with their consent, or * If the", "actually involved, other than the broad area. Because passions are high around this", "of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733). While \"frame challenges\" to a question are often appropriate,", "unsalvageable 3. Leave it alone Personally, I think there is valuable content in", "the answer by focusing it on the response to the OP's question, rather", "I would thus propose that the path to take is to ask the", "misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733), one of the answers [dwells on the scientific substance", "this [highly active question about how to respond to misrepresentation of one's research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/170077/22733),", "author, it is unsurprising that this answer has become highly controversial. I believe", "controversial. I believe that @cag51 made a reasonable proposal for improving the answer", "effectively assent to the edit. I would thus propose that the path to", "policy of this site to avoid discussion of the [content of research](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic). I'd", "addresses the actual question of the OP, and that the discussion of the", "answer writer to respond here and that the direction either be: * Edit", "substance of the matter rather than on the question of how to respond](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170100/22733).", "are high around this subject area and due to the specific position taken", "subject area and due to the specific position taken by the answer author,", "is valuable content in the answer where it addresses the actual question of", "processes: that would be better taken to [Medical Sciences](https://medicalsciences.stackexchange.com/), per the standard policy" ]
[ "comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer the question as is,", "that point out that a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are", "are a frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like", "Also, this gives (diamond and community) moderators a basis for deletions, edits, and", "make changes or discuss them here anymore. --- A frame challenge is an", "and if you think some rule should differ between them; * what kind", "relevant part of this site, but they also bear the risk of belittling", "rules and guidelines for them. The goal here is not to ban frame", "better and more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and community) moderators a basis", "comments. Given the individuality of frame challenges, I expect that we create a", "instead disputes things the asker treats as given in their question (challenges the", "example are answers that point out that a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem).", "question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant part of this", "problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise, but want to see avoided in the", "the frame of the question). A common example are answers that point out", "question as is, but instead disputes things the asker treats as given in", "deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given the individuality of frame challenges, I expect", "goal here is not to ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid the bad", "like to start with collecting aspects that we like to see included in", "frame challenges, I expect that we create a mix of rules and guidelines", "that we like to see included in such a guide. Please post answers", "challenges altogether, but avoid the bad ones and make the good ones better", "is now live](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4976/7734). Please do not make changes or discuss them here anymore.", "the question). A common example are answers that point out that a question", "that we create a mix of rules and guidelines with a considerable grey", "make the good ones better and more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and", "changes or discuss them here anymore. --- A frame challenge is an answer,", "be about (but are not limited to): * something that you want to", "Please do not make changes or discuss them here anymore. --- A frame", "if you think some rule should differ between them; what kind of", "--- A frame challenge is an answer, comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t", "guidelines for them. The goal here is not to ban frame challenges altogether,", "them; * what kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged; * under which conditions", "not make changes or discuss them here anymore. --- A frame challenge is", "but they also bear the risk of belittling the asker and are a", "constructive comments. Given the individuality of frame challenges, I expect that we create", "what kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged; * under which conditions frame challenges", "kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged; * under which conditions frame challenges are", "rules and guidelines with a considerable grey area to be decided on a", "we create a mix of rules and guidelines with a considerable grey area", "but want to see avoided in the future; * both, answers and comments,", "is an answer, comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer the", "(challenges the frame of the question). A common example are answers that point", "things the asker treats as given in their question (challenges the frame of", "this site, but they also bear the risk of belittling the asker and", "good ones better and more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and community) moderators", "a relevant part of this site, but they also bear the risk of", "a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant part of", "Please post answers for single aspects. These may be about (but are not", "frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like to create", "not limited to): * something that you want to forbid, discourage, allow, or", "bad ones and make the good ones better and more welcoming. Also, this", "decided on a per-case basis. Since there are a lot of angles on", "Since there are a lot of angles on this, I would like to", "I would like to start with collecting aspects that we like to see", "that you cannot categorise, but want to see avoided in the future; ", "[FAQ is now live](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4976/7734). Please do not make changes or discuss them here", "now live](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4976/7734). Please do not make changes or discuss them here anymore. ---", "create a mix of rules and guidelines with a considerable grey area to", "to answer the question as is, but instead disputes things the asker treats", "you want to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; examples of problematic behaviour", "and comments, and if you think some rule should differ between them; ", "avoided in the future; both, answers and comments, and if you think", "here anymore. --- A frame challenge is an answer, comment (or part thereof)", "a considerable grey area to be decided on a per-case basis. Since there", "altogether, but avoid the bad ones and make the good ones better and", "but instead disputes things the asker treats as given in their question (challenges", "expect that we create a mix of rules and guidelines with a considerable", "or discuss them here anymore. --- A frame challenge is an answer, comment", "a lot of angles on this, I would like to start with collecting", "they also bear the risk of belittling the asker and are a frequent", "aspects that we like to see included in such a guide. Please post", "in the future; * both, answers and comments, and if you think some", "question). A common example are answers that point out that a question is", "forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; * examples of problematic behaviour that you cannot", "would like to start with collecting aspects that we like to see included", "on this, I would like to start with collecting aspects that we like", "behaviour that you cannot categorise, but want to see avoided in the future;", "not to ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid the bad ones and make", "frame of the question). A common example are answers that point out that", "post answers for single aspects. These may be about (but are not limited", "and community) moderators a basis for deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given the", "with collecting aspects that we like to see included in such a guide.", "(or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer the question as is, but", "would like to create a set of rules and guidelines for them. The", "are a relevant part of this site, but they also bear the risk", "and guidelines for them. The goal here is not to ban frame challenges", "guidelines with a considerable grey area to be decided on a per-case basis.", "basis. Since there are a lot of angles on this, I would like", "you think some rule should differ between them; * what kind of assumptions", "drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like to create a set of", "that you want to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; * examples of problematic", "Update: The [FAQ is now live](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4976/7734). Please do not make changes or discuss", "aspects. These may be about (but are not limited to): * something that", "of rules and guidelines with a considerable grey area to be decided on", "and guidelines with a considerable grey area to be decided on a per-case", "and are a frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would", "question (challenges the frame of the question). A common example are answers that", "there are a lot of angles on this, I would like to start", "be decided on a per-case basis. Since there are a lot of angles", "differ between them; * what kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged; * under", "considerable grey area to be decided on a per-case basis. Since there are", "area to be decided on a per-case basis. Since there are a lot", "to see included in such a guide. Please post answers for single aspects.", "The [FAQ is now live](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4976/7734). Please do not make changes or discuss them", "more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and community) moderators a basis for deletions,", "like to see included in such a guide. Please post answers for single", "want to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; * examples of problematic behaviour that", "are a lot of angles on this, I would like to start with", "to see avoided in the future; * both, answers and comments, and if", "to ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid the bad ones and make the", "part of this site, but they also bear the risk of belittling the", "answers for single aspects. These may be about (but are not limited to):", "gives (diamond and community) moderators a basis for deletions, edits, and constructive comments.", "disputes things the asker treats as given in their question (challenges the frame", "a per-case basis. Since there are a lot of angles on this, I", "The goal here is not to ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid the", "the question as is, but instead disputes things the asker treats as given", "set of rules and guidelines for them. The goal here is not to", "the good ones better and more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and community)", "you cannot categorise, but want to see avoided in the future; * both,", "to create a set of rules and guidelines for them. The goal here", "see avoided in the future; * both, answers and comments, and if you", "(e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like to create a set of rules", "I would like to create a set of rules and guidelines for them.", "single aspects. These may be about (but are not limited to): * something", "categorise, but want to see avoided in the future; * both, answers and", "anymore. --- A frame challenge is an answer, comment (or part thereof) that", "given in their question (challenges the frame of the question). A common example", "common example are answers that point out that a question is an [XY", "do not make changes or discuss them here anymore. --- A frame challenge", "as is, but instead disputes things the asker treats as given in their", "bear the risk of belittling the asker and are a frequent source of", "avoid the bad ones and make the good ones better and more welcoming.", "ones better and more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and community) moderators a", "individuality of frame challenges, I expect that we create a mix of rules", "with a considerable grey area to be decided on a per-case basis. Since", "the individuality of frame challenges, I expect that we create a mix of", "* both, answers and comments, and if you think some rule should differ", "think some rule should differ between them; * what kind of assumptions can", "These may be about (but are not limited to): * something that you", "answers and comments, and if you think some rule should differ between them;", "like to create a set of rules and guidelines for them. The goal", "basis for deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given the individuality of frame challenges,", "point out that a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a", "a basis for deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given the individuality of frame", "ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid the bad ones and make the good", "them here anymore. --- A frame challenge is an answer, comment (or part", "attempt to answer the question as is, but instead disputes things the asker", "lot of angles on this, I would like to start with collecting aspects", "the risk of belittling the asker and are a frequent source of drama", "future; * both, answers and comments, and if you think some rule should", "encourage; * examples of problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise, but want to", "should differ between them; * what kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged; ", "the asker and are a frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why", "of rules and guidelines for them. The goal here is not to ban", "why I would like to create a set of rules and guidelines for", "That’s why I would like to create a set of rules and guidelines", "per-case basis. Since there are a lot of angles on this, I would", "edits, and constructive comments. Given the individuality of frame challenges, I expect that", "both, answers and comments, and if you think some rule should differ between", "some rule should differ between them; what kind of assumptions can be", "of this site, but they also bear the risk of belittling the asker", "source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like to create a", "and more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and community) moderators a basis for", "is, but instead disputes things the asker treats as given in their question", "Frame challenges are a relevant part of this site, but they also bear", "angles on this, I would like to start with collecting aspects that we", "examples of problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise, but want to see avoided", "thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer the question as is, but instead disputes", "is not to ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid the bad ones and", "the bad ones and make the good ones better and more welcoming. Also,", "(diamond and community) moderators a basis for deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given", "on a per-case basis. Since there are a lot of angles on this,", "this gives (diamond and community) moderators a basis for deletions, edits, and constructive", "about (but are not limited to): * something that you want to forbid,", "want to see avoided in the future; * both, answers and comments, and", "in their question (challenges the frame of the question). A common example are", "between them; * what kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged; * under which", "doesn’t attempt to answer the question as is, but instead disputes things the", "challenge* is an answer, comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer", "start with collecting aspects that we like to see included in such a", "A common example are answers that point out that a question is an", "of angles on this, I would like to start with collecting aspects that", "site, but they also bear the risk of belittling the asker and are", "for single aspects. These may be about (but are not limited to): ", "for deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given the individuality of frame challenges, I", "risk of belittling the asker and are a frequent source of drama (e.g.,", "them. The goal here is not to ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid", "moderators a basis for deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given the individuality of", "(but are not limited to): something that you want to forbid, discourage,", "collecting aspects that we like to see included in such a guide. Please", "but avoid the bad ones and make the good ones better and more", "are not limited to): * something that you want to forbid, discourage, allow,", "community) moderators a basis for deletions, edits, and constructive comments. Given the individuality", "of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like to create a set", "a mix of rules and guidelines with a considerable grey area to be", "to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; * examples of problematic behaviour that you", "may be about (but are not limited to): * something that you want", "a frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like to", "of problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise, but want to see avoided in", "such a guide. Please post answers for single aspects. These may be about", "in such a guide. Please post answers for single aspects. These may be", "as given in their question (challenges the frame of the question). A common", "A frame challenge is an answer, comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt", "create a set of rules and guidelines for them. The goal here is", "treats as given in their question (challenges the frame of the question). A", "answers that point out that a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges", "for them. The goal here is not to ban frame challenges altogether, but", "allow, or encourage; * examples of problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise, but", "asker and are a frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I", "an answer, comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer the question", "frame challenges altogether, but avoid the bad ones and make the good ones", "an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant part of this site, but", "comments, and if you think some rule should differ between them; * what", "this, I would like to start with collecting aspects that we like to", "answer the question as is, but instead disputes things the asker treats as", "and constructive comments. Given the individuality of frame challenges, I expect that we", "frame challenge is an answer, comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to", "included in such a guide. Please post answers for single aspects. These may", "to): * something that you want to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; ", " something that you want to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; * examples", "or encourage; * examples of problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise, but want", "a guide. Please post answers for single aspects. These may be about (but", "* what kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged; * under which conditions frame", "are answers that point out that a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame", "guide. Please post answers for single aspects. These may be about (but are", "challenges are a relevant part of this site, but they also bear the", "and make the good ones better and more welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond", "ones and make the good ones better and more welcoming. Also, this gives", "that doesn’t attempt to answer the question as is, but instead disputes things", "live](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4976/7734). Please do not make changes or discuss them here anymore. --- A", "part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer the question as is, but instead", "I expect that we create a mix of rules and guidelines with a", "mix of rules and guidelines with a considerable grey area to be decided", "asker treats as given in their question (challenges the frame of the question).", "Given the individuality of frame challenges, I expect that we create a mix", "that a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant part", "* examples of problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise, but want to see", "welcoming. Also, this gives (diamond and community) moderators a basis for deletions, edits,", "of the question). A common example are answers that point out that a", "to be decided on a per-case basis. Since there are a lot of", "challenges, I expect that we create a mix of rules and guidelines with", "their question (challenges the frame of the question). A common example are answers", "of frame challenges, I expect that we create a mix of rules and", "discuss them here anymore. --- A frame challenge is an answer, comment (or", "out that a question is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant", "discourage, allow, or encourage; * examples of problematic behaviour that you cannot categorise,", "of assumptions can be frame-challenged; * under which conditions frame challenges are appropriate.", "is an [XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant part of this site,", "[XY question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant part of this site, but they", "question](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XY_problem). Frame challenges are a relevant part of this site, but they also", "of belittling the asker and are a frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)).", "a set of rules and guidelines for them. The goal here is not", "grey area to be decided on a per-case basis. Since there are a", "answer, comment (or part thereof) that doesn’t attempt to answer the question as", "the future; * both, answers and comments, and if you think some rule", "here is not to ban frame challenges altogether, but avoid the bad ones", "limited to): * something that you want to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage;", "something that you want to forbid, discourage, allow, or encourage; * examples of", "to start with collecting aspects that we like to see included in such", "rule should differ between them; * what kind of assumptions can be frame-challenged;", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s why I would like to create a set of rules and", "see included in such a guide. Please post answers for single aspects. These", "cannot categorise, but want to see avoided in the future; * both, answers", "belittling the asker and are a frequent source of drama (e.g., [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4939/7734)). That’s", "we like to see included in such a guide. Please post answers for", "also bear the risk of belittling the asker and are a frequent source", "the asker treats as given in their question (challenges the frame of the" ]
[ "question to professor. If there is a question A asked with intention X,", "I phrase an important question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One", "is regarding phrasing an important question to professor. If there is a question", "should I phrase an important question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor)", "an important question to professor. If there is a question A asked with", "professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer of latter also answers the former question.", "[How should I phrase an important question that I need to ask a", "important question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that", "is a question A asked with intention X, got answers that also contain", "that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer of", "a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed as a duplicate to another question:", "question: [How should I phrase an important question that I need to ask", "has been closed as a duplicate to another question: [How should I phrase", "got answers that also contain answer for question B asked with intention Y.", "a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer of latter also answers the former", "to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer of latter also answers", "A asked with intention X, got answers that also contain answer for question", "that also contain answer for question B asked with intention Y. Can the", "important question to professor. If there is a question A asked with intention", "salutation in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed as", "on our main site: [Proper salutation in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today,", "Can the question B be closed as duplicate of A even-though the intentions", "question A asked with intention X, got answers that also contain answer for", "to another question: [How should I phrase an important question that I need", "site: [Proper salutation in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been", "the later is regarding phrasing an important question to professor. If there is", "for question B asked with intention Y. Can the question B be closed", "also answers the former question. But, the intention of the both questions are", "question. But, the intention of the both questions are different. Former is asking", "intention X, got answers that also contain answer for question B asked with", "answers that also contain answer for question B asked with intention Y. Can", "question B asked with intention Y. Can the question B be closed as", "phrase an important question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can", "both questions are different. Former is asking only for salutation and the later", "question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer", "asked with intention Y. Can the question B be closed as duplicate of", "need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer of latter also", "with intention Y. Can the question B be closed as duplicate of A", "the former question. But, the intention of the both questions are different. Former", "are different. Former is asking only for salutation and the later is regarding", "of latter also answers the former question. But, the intention of the both", "professor. If there is a question A asked with intention X, got answers", "requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed as a duplicate to another", "regarding phrasing an important question to professor. If there is a question A", "salutation and the later is regarding phrasing an important question to professor. If", "only for salutation and the later is regarding phrasing an important question to", "there is a question A asked with intention X, got answers that also", "Former is asking only for salutation and the later is regarding phrasing an", "in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed as a", "later is regarding phrasing an important question to professor. If there is a", "a question A asked with intention X, got answers that also contain answer", "answer of latter also answers the former question. But, the intention of the", "intention of the both questions are different. Former is asking only for salutation", "for salutation and the later is regarding phrasing an important question to professor.", "ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer of latter also answers the", "that answer of latter also answers the former question. But, the intention of", "closed as a duplicate to another question: [How should I phrase an important", "Recently I asked a question on our main site: [Proper salutation in email", "it has been closed as a duplicate to another question: [How should I", "main site: [Proper salutation in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has", "answer for question B asked with intention Y. Can the question B be", "to professor. If there is a question A asked with intention X, got", "the both questions are different. Former is asking only for salutation and the", "email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed as a duplicate", "answers the former question. But, the intention of the both questions are different.", "contain answer for question B asked with intention Y. Can the question B", "duplicate to another question: [How should I phrase an important question that I", "questions are different. Former is asking only for salutation and the later is", "our main site: [Proper salutation in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it", "been closed as a duplicate to another question: [How should I phrase an", "asked with intention X, got answers that also contain answer for question B", "B be closed as duplicate of A even-though the intentions X and Y", "a question on our main site: [Proper salutation in email for requesting a", "question on our main site: [Proper salutation in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource).", "asked a question on our main site: [Proper salutation in email for requesting", "can observe that answer of latter also answers the former question. But, the", "be closed as duplicate of A even-though the intentions X and Y differ?", "X, got answers that also contain answer for question B asked with intention", "an important question that I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe", "the intention of the both questions are different. Former is asking only for", "is asking only for salutation and the later is regarding phrasing an important", "[Proper salutation in email for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed", "a duplicate to another question: [How should I phrase an important question that", "Today, it has been closed as a duplicate to another question: [How should", "for requesting a resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed as a duplicate to", "latter also answers the former question. But, the intention of the both questions", "asking only for salutation and the later is regarding phrasing an important question", "of the both questions are different. Former is asking only for salutation and", "the question B be closed as duplicate of A even-though the intentions X", "But, the intention of the both questions are different. Former is asking only", "If there is a question A asked with intention X, got answers that", "intention Y. Can the question B be closed as duplicate of A even-though", "I asked a question on our main site: [Proper salutation in email for", "another question: [How should I phrase an important question that I need to", "Y. Can the question B be closed as duplicate of A even-though the", "question B be closed as duplicate of A even-though the intentions X and", "phrasing an important question to professor. If there is a question A asked", "different. Former is asking only for salutation and the later is regarding phrasing", "and the later is regarding phrasing an important question to professor. If there", "with intention X, got answers that also contain answer for question B asked", "I need to ask a professor?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/90725/how-should-i-phrase-an-important-question-that-i-need-to-ask-a-professor) One can observe that answer of latter", "as a duplicate to another question: [How should I phrase an important question", "One can observe that answer of latter also answers the former question. But,", "observe that answer of latter also answers the former question. But, the intention", "also contain answer for question B asked with intention Y. Can the question", "resource](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170291/proper-salutation-in-email-for-requesting-a-resource). Today, it has been closed as a duplicate to another question: [How", "former question. But, the intention of the both questions are different. Former is", "B asked with intention Y. Can the question B be closed as duplicate" ]
[ "There are several problems with the moderator edit: * (1) It removes relevant", "of the post; * (2) The edit does not fall within the scope", "answer: (1) there was an initial detailed answer that received a large number", "etc., without removing this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is that", "the answer; (3) the moderator edited the answer to remove the bulk of", "comes first, to discuss whether or not the answer should be edited down.", "restored his edit removing most of the content, and locked the post to", "this answer has a high net upvote score, suggesting that a large number", "the bulk of the content (including both the new section and most of", "the answer that was the subject of the meta-post cited by the moderator,", "this change. In previous cases there is usually a discussion on Meta that", "I appreciate the work of moderators on this site, including the present moderator.", "that it represents an instance where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of contents", "(5) moderator then restored his edit removing most of the content, and locked", "contradicts the moderator's own instruction that the post should not be heavily edited", "(A brief history of the answer: (1) there was an initial detailed answer", "received a large number of upvotes and a few downvotes (approx +50 net", "challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises, etc., without removing this content as \"off-topic\".", "of its original content, and this edit substantially detracts from the quality of", "- If you wish to discuss this edit please feel free to do", "as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is that it represents an instance where", "upvotes and a few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from", "I added an additional section to the answer, and there were then a", "its original form in (1), when the bulk of voting occurred; and (5)", "to discuss this edit please feel free to do so on Meta, but", "the bulk of votes are accrued to the post; * (5) Unlike the", "we allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises, etc., without", "highly upvoted answer) and then put the onus on the answerer to go", "questions where there is an assertion of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem", "votes, I rolled back all edits to restore my answer to its original", "there are some very stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in", "seems to be getting more common for moderators to edit down answers where", "edited the answer to remove the bulk of the content (including both the", "including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my answer has been edited", "in the question, in order to give context for the advice at the", "is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where there is an assertion of \"racism\"", "to be of value in answering the question; and * (6) The edits", "of the answer: (1) there was an initial detailed answer that received a", "moderators on this site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my", "I would like the original content of the post restored. There are several", "of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance; * (3)", "detailed answer that received a large number of upvotes and a few downvotes", "that the content is \"controversial\", and in such cases, there are some very", "(including both the new section and most of the original post), based on", "was the subject of the meta-post cited by the moderator, this answer has", "would like the original content of the post restored. There are several problems", "on this site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my answer", "of the post. (The main negative effect is that it removes contextual argument", "than the original version; and * (4) The edit *contradicts the moderator's own", "rationale above; (4) based on the rationale that the answer should not be", "post; (5) Unlike the case of the answer that was the subject", "the edit the moderator cites another meta post discussing whether or not a", "moderator also states, \"OP - If you wish to discuss this edit please", "give context for the advice at the end of the post; * (2)", "and (5) moderator then restored his edit removing most of the content, and", "of the meta-post cited by the moderator, this answer has a high net", "in answering the question; and * (6) The edits pre-empt the current discussion", "of the content, and locked the post to prevent further edits.) --- I", "make any substantial change to the net score of the answer; (3) the", "the new section and most of the original post), based on his rationale", "order to give context for the advice at the end of the post;", "(2) following solicitation from other users in the comments section, I added an", "post.) It seems to be getting more common for moderators to edit down", "the answer: (1) there was an initial detailed answer that received a large", "authority for the edit the moderator cites another meta post discussing whether or", "the bulk of voting occurred; and (5) moderator then restored his edit removing", "scope of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance; ", "of votes are accrued to the post; (5) Unlike the case of", "case a highly upvoted answer) and then put the onus on the answerer", "back all edits to restore my answer to its original form in (1),", "that it removes contextual argument on the premises of the question that are", "edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion of the content.", "\"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate the work of moderators on this", "that we allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises, etc.,", "cases, there are some very stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In particular,", "be heavily edited after the bulk of votes are accrued to the post;", "seem to be opposed to answers that question this premise. Questions on racism,", "of the answer; (3) the moderator edited the answer to remove the bulk", "do so on Meta, but please refrain from heavy editing as the current", "Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going to be controversial, so it", "bulk of contents from an answer (in this case a highly upvoted answer)", "sets a bad precedent in which moderators remove content under a strained interpretation", "high net upvote score, suggesting that a large number of users found the", "bulk of the content (including both the new section and most of the", "of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate the work of", "in the comments section, I added an additional section to the answer, and", "(1) there was an initial detailed answer that received a large number of", "the case of the answer that was the subject of the meta-post cited", "to its original form in (1), when the bulk of voting occurred; and", "number of upvotes and a few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following", "racist comments has been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial", "represents an instance where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of contents from an", "has now locked the post to prevent rollback of his edits. (A brief", "votes which did not make any substantial change to the net score of", "premises of the question that are crucial to understanding the advice given in", "to a shell of its original content, and this edit substantially detracts from", "the content (including both the new section and most of the original post),", "the moderator edited the answer to remove the bulk of the content (including", "then put the onus on the answerer to go to Meta to appeal", "* (6) The edits pre-empt the current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\"", "contextual argument on the premises of the question that are crucial to understanding", "moderators to edit down answers where they feel that the content is \"controversial\",", "contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP - If you wish to", "subject of the meta-post cited by the moderator, this answer has a high", "in such cases, there are some very stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\".", "false premises, etc., without removing this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here", "was present.\" The moderator has now locked the post to prevent rollback of", "the moderator cites another meta post discussing whether or not a different answer", "moderator then restored his edit removing most of the content, and locked the", "numbers of votes, I rolled back all edits to restore my answer to", "The edit does not fall within the scope of [when should I edit", "the post should not be heavily edited after the bulk of votes are", "\"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is that it represents an instance where moderators", "present case sets a bad precedent in which moderators remove content under a", "additional section to the answer, and there were then a small number of", "be edited down. The present case sets a bad precedent in which moderators", "change to the net score of the answer; (3) the moderator edited the", "then a small number of additional votes which did not make any substantial", "[when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance; * (3) The", "--- this content is on-topic and gives a detailed argument challenging a false", "such cases, there are some very stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In", "the current votes are based on what was present.\" The moderator has now", "to address racist comments has been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove", "is important that we allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false", "moderator has now locked the post to prevent rollback of his edits. (A", "both the new section and most of the original post), based on his", "brief history of the answer: (1) there was an initial detailed answer that", "moderator, this answer has a high net upvote score, suggesting that a large", "small number of additional votes which did not make any substantial change to", "I rolled back all edits to restore my answer to its original form", "not make any substantial change to the net score of the answer; (3)", "to prevent rollback of his edits. (A brief history of the answer: (1)", "where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of contents from an answer (in this", "getting more common for moderators to edit down answers where they feel that", "his rationale above; (4) based on the rationale that the answer should not", "answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP - If you wish", "my answer to its original form in (1), when the bulk of voting", "(1) It removes relevant content --- this content is on-topic and gives a", "context for the advice at the end of the post; * (2) The", "content is on-topic and gives a detailed argument challenging a false premise in", "a discussion on Meta that comes first, to discuss whether or not the", "answer to remove the bulk of the content (including both the new section", "bulk of voting occurred; and (5) moderator then restored his edit removing most", "an additional section to the answer, and there were then a small number", "present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my answer has been edited down to", "the answer should be edited down. The present case sets a bad precedent", "the original post), based on his rationale above; (4) based on the rationale", "current votes are based on what was present.\" The moderator has now locked", "form in (1), when the bulk of voting occurred; and (5) moderator then", "post to prevent further edits.) --- I do not agree with the removal", "removing most of the content, and locked the post to prevent further edits.)", "at the end of the post; * (2) The edit does not fall", "help centre guidance; * (3) The edit does not leave the post in", "the rationale that the answer should not be heavily edited after receiving substantial", "question; and * (6) The edits pre-empt the current discussion of development of", "original content, and this edit substantially detracts from the quality of the post.", "on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going to be controversial, so it is", "very stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where there", "a detailed argument challenging a false premise in the question, in order to", "the help centre guidance; * (3) The edit does not leave the post", "of votes, I rolled back all edits to restore my answer to its", "a highly upvoted answer) and then put the onus on the answerer to", "argument challenging a false premise in the question, in order to give context", "common for moderators to edit down answers where they feel that the content", "restored. There are several problems with the moderator edit: * (1) It removes", "agree with the removal of content from this answer and I would like", "is an assertion of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem to be opposed", "problem here is that it represents an instance where moderators unilaterally remove the", "usually a discussion on Meta that comes first, to discuss whether or not", "are necessarily going to be controversial, so it is important that we allow", "there was an initial detailed answer that received a large number of upvotes", "initial detailed answer that received a large number of upvotes and a few", "number of users found the post to be of value in answering the", "the post restored. There are several problems with the moderator edit: * (1)", "substantial change to the net score of the answer; (3) the moderator edited", "edit the moderator cites another meta post discussing whether or not a different", "another meta post discussing whether or not a different answer contains off-topic commentary.", "be heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers of votes, I rolled back all", "a better state than the original version; and * (4) The edit *contradicts", "has been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion of", "do not agree with the removal of content from this answer and I", "an initial detailed answer that received a large number of upvotes and a", "edited after the bulk of votes are accrued to the post; (5)", "other users in the comments section, I added an additional section to the", "more common for moderators to edit down answers where they feel that the", "to edit down answers where they feel that the content is \"controversial\", and", "for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises, etc., without removing this content", "restore my answer to its original form in (1), when the bulk of", "advice given in the post.) It seems to be getting more common for", "to be controversial, so it is important that we allow scope for \"frame", "meta post discussing whether or not a different answer contains off-topic commentary. The", "bulk of votes are accrued to the post; * (5) Unlike the case", "answers where they feel that the content is \"controversial\", and in such cases,", "be opposed to answers that question this premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc.,", "a different answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP - If", "effect is that it removes contextual argument on the premises of the question", "the scope of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance;", "please feel free to do so on Meta, but please refrain from heavy", "the onus on the answerer to go to Meta to appeal this change.", "with the removal of content from this answer and I would like the", "edits pre-empt the current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. ---", "about potentially false premises, etc., without removing this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary", "few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other users in", "this site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my answer has", "within the scope of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre", "in questions where there is an assertion of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators", "change. In previous cases there is usually a discussion on Meta that comes", "to answers that question this premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily", "editing as the current votes are based on what was present.\" The moderator", "and then put the onus on the answerer to go to Meta to", "answer that received a large number of upvotes and a few downvotes (approx", "put the onus on the answerer to go to Meta to appeal this", "or not the answer should be edited down. The present case sets a", "on Meta. --- I appreciate the work of moderators on this site, including", "understanding the advice given in the post.) It seems to be getting more", "edit substantially detracts from the quality of the post. (The main negative effect", "down to a shell of its original content, and this edit substantially detracts", "of upvotes and a few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation", "of additional votes which did not make any substantial change to the net", "end of the post; (2) The edit does not fall within the", "going to be controversial, so it is important that we allow scope for", "question, in order to give context for the advice at the end of", "not leave the post in a better state than the original version; and", "content, and locked the post to prevent further edits.) --- I do not", "unilaterally remove the bulk of contents from an answer (in this case a", "receiving substantial numbers of votes, I rolled back all edits to restore my", "upvoted answer) and then put the onus on the answerer to go to", "on what was present.\" The moderator has now locked the post to prevent", "(4) based on the rationale that the answer should not be heavily edited", "the advice given in the post.) It seems to be getting more common", "of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem to be opposed to answers that", "the current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate", "are crucial to understanding the advice given in the post.) It seems to", "this case a highly upvoted answer) and then put the onus on the", "(3) the moderator edited the answer to remove the bulk of the content", "upvote score, suggesting that a large number of users found the post to", "negative effect is that it removes contextual argument on the premises of the", "that received a large number of upvotes and a few downvotes (approx +50", "the post to prevent rollback of his edits. (A brief history of the", "the moderator, this answer has a high net upvote score, suggesting that a", "edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance; * (3) The edit does not", "discussion on Meta that comes first, to discuss whether or not the answer", "downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other users in the", "from an answer (in this case a highly upvoted answer) and then put", "given in the post.) It seems to be getting more common for moderators", "the comments section, I added an additional section to the answer, and there", "on the rationale that the answer should not be heavily edited after receiving", "original form in (1), when the bulk of voting occurred; and (5) moderator", "that was the subject of the meta-post cited by the moderator, this answer", "moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my answer has been edited down to a", "edit down answers where they feel that the content is \"controversial\", and in", "answer should be edited down. The present case sets a bad precedent in", "whether or not a different answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also states,", "heavy editing as the current votes are based on what was present.\" The", "first, to discuss whether or not the answer should be edited down. The", "discuss whether or not the answer should be edited down. The present case", "that the post should not be heavily edited after the bulk of votes", "further edits.) --- I do not agree with the removal of content from", "edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction* that the post should not be heavily", "post should not be heavily edited after the bulk of votes are accrued", "moderators seem to be opposed to answers that question this premise. Questions on", "\"controversial\", and in such cases, there are some very stretched interpretations of what", "the quality of the post. (The main negative effect is that it removes", "of contents from an answer (in this case a highly upvoted answer) and", "controversial, so it is important that we allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning", "are based on what was present.\" The moderator has now locked the post", "content --- this content is on-topic and gives a detailed argument challenging a", "of his edits. (A brief history of the answer: (1) there was an", "votes are accrued to the post; * (5) Unlike the case of the", "the post; * (2) The edit does not fall within the scope of", "is that it removes contextual argument on the premises of the question that", "questioning about potentially false premises, etc., without removing this content as \"off-topic\". A", "the OP, moderators seem to be opposed to answers that question this premise.", "where there is an assertion of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem to", "premises, etc., without removing this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is", "stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where there is", "in this instance my answer has been edited down to a shell of", "a bad precedent in which moderators remove content under a strained interpretation of", "locked the post to prevent further edits.) --- I do not agree with", "solicitation from other users in the comments section, I added an additional section", "necessarily going to be controversial, so it is important that we allow scope", "previous cases there is usually a discussion on Meta that comes first, to", "remove the bulk of the content (including both the new section and most", "the subject of the meta-post cited by the moderator, this answer has a", "etc., are necessarily going to be controversial, so it is important that we", "all edits to restore my answer to its original form in (1), when", "there were then a small number of additional votes which did not make", "you wish to discuss this edit please feel free to do so on", "question this premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going to be", "that question this premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going to", "\"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises, etc., without removing this content as", "in which moderators remove content under a strained interpretation of what is \"off-topic\".", "A secondary problem here is that it represents an instance where moderators unilaterally", "score of the answer; (3) the moderator edited the answer to remove the", "section, I added an additional section to the answer, and there were then", "rolled back all edits to restore my answer to its original form in", "development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate the work of moderators", "answer; (3) the moderator edited the answer to remove the bulk of the", "were then a small number of additional votes which did not make any", "(3) The edit does not leave the post in a better state than", "voting occurred; and (5) moderator then restored his edit removing most of the", "history of the answer: (1) there was an initial detailed answer that received", "(2) The edit does not fall within the scope of [when should I", "value in answering the question; and * (6) The edits pre-empt the current", "As authority for the edit the moderator cites another meta post discussing whether", "so on Meta, but please refrain from heavy editing as the current votes", "moderator cites another meta post discussing whether or not a different answer contains", "the question, in order to give context for the advice at the end", "to remove the bulk of the content (including both the new section and", "whether or not the answer should be edited down. The present case sets", "there is an assertion of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem to be", "here is that it represents an instance where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk", "to give context for the advice at the end of the post; ", "moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion of the content. As authority for", "a large number of upvotes and a few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes);", "discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate the work", "the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my answer has been edited down", "I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance; (3) The edit does", "important that we allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises,", "appeal this change. In previous cases there is usually a discussion on Meta", "shell of its original content, and this edit substantially detracts from the quality", "different answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP - If you", "post), based on his rationale above; (4) based on the rationale that the", "the post in a better state than the original version; and * (4)", "and this edit substantially detracts from the quality of the post. (The main", "most of the content, and locked the post to prevent further edits.) ---", "prevent further edits.) --- I do not agree with the removal of content", "the meta-post cited by the moderator, this answer has a high net upvote", "some very stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where", "on Meta, but please refrain from heavy editing as the current votes are", "number of additional votes which did not make any substantial change to the", "most of the original post), based on his rationale above; (4) based on", "detailed argument challenging a false premise in the question, in order to give", "content is \"controversial\", and in such cases, there are some very stretched interpretations", "rationale that the answer should not be heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers", "original content of the post restored. There are several problems with the moderator", "own instruction** that the post should not be heavily edited after the bulk", "detracts from the quality of the post. (The main negative effect is that", "should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance; * (3) The edit", "the answer to remove the bulk of the content (including both the new", "refrain from heavy editing as the current votes are based on what was", "following solicitation from other users in the comments section, I added an additional", "post. (The main negative effect is that it removes contextual argument on the", "for moderators to edit down answers where they feel that the content is", "Meta. --- I appreciate the work of moderators on this site, including the", "not a different answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP -", "the end of the post; * (2) The edit does not fall within", "address racist comments has been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a", "edited down to a shell of its original content, and this edit substantially", "its original content, and this edit substantially detracts from the quality of the", "to the net score of the answer; (3) the moderator edited the answer", "in the post.) It seems to be getting more common for moderators to", "\"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where there is an assertion of \"racism\" by", "content of the post restored. There are several problems with the moderator edit:", "* (5) Unlike the case of the answer that was the subject of", "scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises, etc., without removing this", "so it is important that we allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about", "in (1), when the bulk of voting occurred; and (5) moderator then restored", "to restore my answer to its original form in (1), when the bulk", "the post to prevent further edits.) --- I do not agree with the", "and * (4) The edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction that the post", "remove the bulk of contents from an answer (in this case a highly", "Meta, but please refrain from heavy editing as the current votes are based", "is that it represents an instance where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of", "remove a substantial portion of the content. As authority for the edit the", "that the answer should not be heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers of", "above; (4) based on the rationale that the answer should not be heavily", "locked the post to prevent rollback of his edits. (A brief history of", "discussing whether or not a different answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also", "when the bulk of voting occurred; and (5) moderator then restored his edit", "current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate the", "to be getting more common for moderators to edit down answers where they", "comments section, I added an additional section to the answer, and there were", "feel that the content is \"controversial\", and in such cases, there are some", "In particular, in questions where there is an assertion of \"racism\" by the", "gives a detailed argument challenging a false premise in the question, in order", "content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is that it represents an instance", "interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where there is an", "of what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where there is an assertion", "cases there is usually a discussion on Meta that comes first, to discuss", "by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion of the content. As", "as the current votes are based on what was present.\" The moderator has", "to appeal this change. In previous cases there is usually a discussion on", "and I would like the original content of the post restored. There are", "question about how to address racist comments has been edited by a moderator", "appreciate the work of moderators on this site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless,", "section to the answer, and there were then a small number of additional", "of users found the post to be of value in answering the question;", "answer and I would like the original content of the post restored. There", "(approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other users in the comments", "edits.) --- I do not agree with the removal of content from this", "the removal of content from this answer and I would like the original", "answer, and there were then a small number of additional votes which did", "the advice at the end of the post; * (2) The edit does", "It removes relevant content --- this content is on-topic and gives a detailed", "my answer has been edited down to a shell of its original content,", "down. The present case sets a bad precedent in which moderators remove content", "content (including both the new section and most of the original post), based", "site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance my answer has been", "it removes contextual argument on the premises of the question that are crucial", "removes contextual argument on the premises of the question that are crucial to", "accrued to the post; * (5) Unlike the case of the answer that", "of the post restored. There are several problems with the moderator edit: ", "present.\" The moderator has now locked the post to prevent rollback of his", "--- I appreciate the work of moderators on this site, including the present", "The edit does not leave the post in a better state than the", "the answerer to go to Meta to appeal this change. In previous cases", "of the original post), based on his rationale above; (4) based on the", "relevant content --- this content is on-topic and gives a detailed argument challenging", "substantial numbers of votes, I rolled back all edits to restore my answer", "or not a different answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP", "post to prevent rollback of his edits. (A brief history of the answer:", "of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate the work of moderators on", "his edits. (A brief history of the answer: (1) there was an initial", "in the help centre guidance; (3) The edit does not leave the", "on the premises of the question that are crucial to understanding the advice", "any substantial change to the net score of the answer; (3) the moderator", "been edited down to a shell of its original content, and this edit", "of the question that are crucial to understanding the advice given in the", "did not make any substantial change to the net score of the answer;", "+50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other users in the comments section,", "recent [answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170131) to a question about how to address racist comments has been", "answer has a high net upvote score, suggesting that a large number of", "OP, moderators seem to be opposed to answers that question this premise. Questions", "My recent [answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170131) to a question about how to address racist comments has", "instance where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of contents from an answer (in", "of voting occurred; and (5) moderator then restored his edit removing most of", "post restored. There are several problems with the moderator edit: * (1) It", "better state than the original version; and * (4) The edit *contradicts the", "moderator edit: (1) It removes relevant content --- this content is on-topic", "* (1) It removes relevant content --- this content is on-topic and gives", "allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially false premises, etc., without removing", "\"OP - If you wish to discuss this edit please feel free to", "answer (in this case a highly upvoted answer) and then put the onus", "onus on the answerer to go to Meta to appeal this change. In", "cites another meta post discussing whether or not a different answer contains off-topic", "bad precedent in which moderators remove content under a strained interpretation of what", "cited by the moderator, this answer has a high net upvote score, suggesting", "meta-post cited by the moderator, this answer has a high net upvote score,", "several problems with the moderator edit: * (1) It removes relevant content ---", "suggesting that a large number of users found the post to be of", "racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going to be controversial, so it is important", "of value in answering the question; and * (6) The edits pre-empt the", "the original content of the post restored. There are several problems with the", "content, and this edit substantially detracts from the quality of the post. (The", "an assertion of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem to be opposed to", "is usually a discussion on Meta that comes first, to discuss whether or", "heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers of votes, I rolled back all edits", "posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help centre guidance; * (3) The edit does not leave", "this premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going to be controversial,", "how to address racist comments has been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to", "\"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem to be opposed to answers that question", "case sets a bad precedent in which moderators remove content under a strained", "to understanding the advice given in the post.) It seems to be getting", "like the original content of the post restored. There are several problems with", "prevent rollback of his edits. (A brief history of the answer: (1) there", "after the bulk of votes are accrued to the post; * (5) Unlike", "additional votes which did not make any substantial change to the net score", "The edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction that the post should not be", "and locked the post to prevent further edits.) --- I do not agree", "his edit removing most of the content, and locked the post to prevent", "and gives a detailed argument challenging a false premise in the question, in", "states, \"OP - If you wish to discuss this edit please feel free", "substantial portion of the content. As authority for the edit the moderator cites", "the premises of the question that are crucial to understanding the advice given", "which did not make any substantial change to the net score of the", "to go to Meta to appeal this change. In previous cases there is", "net score of the answer; (3) the moderator edited the answer to remove", "of the content (including both the new section and most of the original", "a false premise in the question, in order to give context for the", "not fall within the scope of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the", "this answer and I would like the original content of the post restored.", "(1), when the bulk of voting occurred; and (5) moderator then restored his", "It seems to be getting more common for moderators to edit down answers", "the bulk of contents from an answer (in this case a highly upvoted", "is \"controversial\", and in such cases, there are some very stretched interpretations of", "* (3) The edit does not leave the post in a better state", "the original version; and * (4) The edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction", "from the quality of the post. (The main negative effect is that it", "score, suggesting that a large number of users found the post to be", "edit does not fall within the scope of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing)", "to be opposed to answers that question this premise. Questions on racism, sexism,", "to prevent further edits.) --- I do not agree with the removal of", "a substantial portion of the content. As authority for the edit the moderator", "the answer should not be heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers of votes,", "down answers where they feel that the content is \"controversial\", and in such", "that are crucial to understanding the advice given in the post.) It seems", "sexism, etc., are necessarily going to be controversial, so it is important that", "for the advice at the end of the post; * (2) The edit", "with the moderator edit: * (1) It removes relevant content --- this content", "that comes first, to discuss whether or not the answer should be edited", "edit does not leave the post in a better state than the original", "please refrain from heavy editing as the current votes are based on what", "to do so on Meta, but please refrain from heavy editing as the", "not be heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers of votes, I rolled back", "on the answerer to go to Meta to appeal this change. In previous", "then restored his edit removing most of the content, and locked the post", "instance my answer has been edited down to a shell of its original", "The edits pre-empt the current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta.", "content from this answer and I would like the original content of the", "content. As authority for the edit the moderator cites another meta post discussing", "to a question about how to address racist comments has been edited by", "a small number of additional votes which did not make any substantial change", "assertion of \"racism\" by the OP, moderators seem to be opposed to answers", "potentially false premises, etc., without removing this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem", "based on the rationale that the answer should not be heavily edited after", "by the OP, moderators seem to be opposed to answers that question this", "it is important that we allow scope for \"frame challenges\", questioning about potentially", "large number of users found the post to be of value in answering", "does not fall within the scope of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in", "that a large number of users found the post to be of value", "be controversial, so it is important that we allow scope for \"frame challenges\",", "should not be heavily edited after the bulk of votes are accrued to", "is on-topic and gives a detailed argument challenging a false premise in the", "post to be of value in answering the question; and * (6) The", "this instance my answer has been edited down to a shell of its", "contents from an answer (in this case a highly upvoted answer) and then", "occurred; and (5) moderator then restored his edit removing most of the content,", "free to do so on Meta, but please refrain from heavy editing as", "(4) The edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction that the post should not", "substantially detracts from the quality of the post. (The main negative effect is", "are several problems with the moderator edit: * (1) It removes relevant content", "rollback of his edits. (A brief history of the answer: (1) there was", "an instance where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of contents from an answer", "the content. As authority for the edit the moderator cites another meta post", "premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going to be controversial, so", "The moderator also states, \"OP - If you wish to discuss this edit", "commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP - If you wish to discuss this", "post; * (2) The edit does not fall within the scope of [when", "discuss this edit please feel free to do so on Meta, but please", "a large number of users found the post to be of value in", "from this answer and I would like the original content of the post", "case of the answer that was the subject of the meta-post cited by", "edit removing most of the content, and locked the post to prevent further", "was an initial detailed answer that received a large number of upvotes and", "advice at the end of the post; * (2) The edit does not", "of moderators on this site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this instance", "the post; * (5) Unlike the case of the answer that was the", "The moderator has now locked the post to prevent rollback of his edits.", "after receiving substantial numbers of votes, I rolled back all edits to restore", "and there were then a small number of additional votes which did not", "edits to restore my answer to its original form in (1), when the", "in a better state than the original version; and * (4) The edit", "what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions where there is an assertion of", "about how to address racist comments has been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal))", "section and most of the original post), based on his rationale above; (4)", "this edit substantially detracts from the quality of the post. (The main negative", "The present case sets a bad precedent in which moderators remove content under", "it represents an instance where moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of contents from", "to discuss whether or not the answer should be edited down. The present", "to Meta to appeal this change. In previous cases there is usually a", "work of moderators on this site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in this", "this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is that it represents an", "the moderator's own instruction** that the post should not be heavily edited after", "[answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/170131) to a question about how to address racist comments has been edited", "secondary problem here is that it represents an instance where moderators unilaterally remove", "off-topic commentary. The moderator also states, \"OP - If you wish to discuss", "net upvote score, suggesting that a large number of users found the post", "users found the post to be of value in answering the question; and", "* (2) The edit does not fall within the scope of [when should", "answer has been edited down to a shell of its original content, and", "moderator's own instruction** that the post should not be heavily edited after the", "moderator edited the answer to remove the bulk of the content (including both", "of the answer that was the subject of the meta-post cited by the", "false premise in the question, in order to give context for the advice", "now locked the post to prevent rollback of his edits. (A brief history", "edited after receiving substantial numbers of votes, I rolled back all edits to", "pre-empt the current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on Meta. --- I", "--- I do not agree with the removal of content from this answer", "(5) Unlike the case of the answer that was the subject of the", "crucial to understanding the advice given in the post.) It seems to be", "(in this case a highly upvoted answer) and then put the onus on", "but please refrain from heavy editing as the current votes are based on", "post in a better state than the original version; and * (4) The", "a shell of its original content, and this edit substantially detracts from the", "main negative effect is that it removes contextual argument on the premises of", "and in such cases, there are some very stretched interpretations of what is", "edit please feel free to do so on Meta, but please refrain from", "upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other users in the comments section, I added", "to the post; * (5) Unlike the case of the answer that was", "not the answer should be edited down. The present case sets a bad", "added an additional section to the answer, and there were then a small", "problems with the moderator edit: * (1) It removes relevant content --- this", "If you wish to discuss this edit please feel free to do so", "moderators unilaterally remove the bulk of contents from an answer (in this case", "has been edited down to a shell of its original content, and this", "feel free to do so on Meta, but please refrain from heavy editing", "the moderator edit: * (1) It removes relevant content --- this content is", "without removing this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is that it", "where they feel that the content is \"controversial\", and in such cases, there", "guidance; * (3) The edit does not leave the post in a better", "from other users in the comments section, I added an additional section to", "argument on the premises of the question that are crucial to understanding the", "portion of the content. As authority for the edit the moderator cites another", "and most of the original post), based on his rationale above; (4) based", "and * (6) The edits pre-empt the current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge", "original post), based on his rationale above; (4) based on the rationale that", "precedent in which moderators remove content under a strained interpretation of what is", "for the edit the moderator cites another meta post discussing whether or not", "the answer, and there were then a small number of additional votes which", "are some very stretched interpretations of what is \"off-topic\". In particular, in questions", "what was present.\" The moderator has now locked the post to prevent rollback", "on-topic and gives a detailed argument challenging a false premise in the question,", "in order to give context for the advice at the end of the", "quality of the post. (The main negative effect is that it removes contextual", "from heavy editing as the current votes are based on what was present.\"", "premise in the question, in order to give context for the advice at", "Meta that comes first, to discuss whether or not the answer should be", "the content is \"controversial\", and in such cases, there are some very stretched", "based on what was present.\" The moderator has now locked the post to", "of the content. As authority for the edit the moderator cites another meta", "centre guidance; * (3) The edit does not leave the post in a", "there is usually a discussion on Meta that comes first, to discuss whether", "the post to be of value in answering the question; and * (6)", "found the post to be of value in answering the question; and ", "be of value in answering the question; and (6) The edits pre-empt", "particular, in questions where there is an assertion of \"racism\" by the OP,", "answer that was the subject of the meta-post cited by the moderator, this", "new section and most of the original post), based on his rationale above;", "also states, \"OP - If you wish to discuss this edit please feel", "the post. (The main negative effect is that it removes contextual argument on", "* (4) The edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction that the post should", "(The main negative effect is that it removes contextual argument on the premises", "guidelines\" on Meta. --- I appreciate the work of moderators on this site,", "this edit please feel free to do so on Meta, but please refrain", "go to Meta to appeal this change. In previous cases there is usually", "comments has been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion", "of content from this answer and I would like the original content of", "edit: * (1) It removes relevant content --- this content is on-topic and", "edits. (A brief history of the answer: (1) there was an initial detailed", "challenging a false premise in the question, in order to give context for", "the net score of the answer; (3) the moderator edited the answer to", "original version; and * (4) The edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction that", "heavily edited after the bulk of votes are accrued to the post; ", "should be edited down. The present case sets a bad precedent in which", "should not be heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers of votes, I rolled", "removing this content as \"off-topic\". A secondary problem here is that it represents", "version; and (4) The edit contradicts the moderator's own instruction that the", "answer) and then put the onus on the answerer to go to Meta", "this content is on-topic and gives a detailed argument challenging a false premise", "and a few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other", "post discussing whether or not a different answer contains off-topic commentary. The moderator", "by the moderator, this answer has a high net upvote score, suggesting that", "question that are crucial to understanding the advice given in the post.) It", "on his rationale above; (4) based on the rationale that the answer should", "the work of moderators on this site, including the present moderator. Nevertheless, in", "In previous cases there is usually a discussion on Meta that comes first,", "state than the original version; and * (4) The edit *contradicts the moderator's", "the question that are crucial to understanding the advice given in the post.)", "does not leave the post in a better state than the original version;", "edited down. The present case sets a bad precedent in which moderators remove", "to the answer, and there were then a small number of additional votes", "([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion of the content. As authority for the", "votes are based on what was present.\" The moderator has now locked the", "on Meta that comes first, to discuss whether or not the answer should", "answer to its original form in (1), when the bulk of voting occurred;", "Meta to appeal this change. In previous cases there is usually a discussion", "the content, and locked the post to prevent further edits.) --- I do", "net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other users in the comments section, I", "removal of content from this answer and I would like the original content", "has a high net upvote score, suggesting that a large number of users", "an answer (in this case a highly upvoted answer) and then put the", "instruction* that the post should not be heavily edited after the bulk of", "a few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2) following solicitation from other users", "a question about how to address racist comments has been edited by a", "based on his rationale above; (4) based on the rationale that the answer", "are accrued to the post; * (5) Unlike the case of the answer", "(6) The edits pre-empt the current discussion of development of \"frame-challenge guidelines\" on", "fall within the scope of [when should I edit posts](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/editing) in the help", "a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion of the content. As authority", "they feel that the content is \"controversial\", and in such cases, there are", "the post.) It seems to be getting more common for moderators to edit", "wish to discuss this edit please feel free to do so on Meta,", "removes relevant content --- this content is on-topic and gives a detailed argument", "not be heavily edited after the bulk of votes are accrued to the", "not agree with the removal of content from this answer and I would", "I do not agree with the removal of content from this answer and", "been edited by a moderator ([eykanal](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/73/eykanal)) to remove a substantial portion of the", "Unlike the case of the answer that was the subject of the meta-post", "answers that question this premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are necessarily going", "answering the question; and * (6) The edits pre-empt the current discussion of", "be getting more common for moderators to edit down answers where they feel", "answerer to go to Meta to appeal this change. In previous cases there", "to remove a substantial portion of the content. As authority for the edit", "the question; and * (6) The edits pre-empt the current discussion of development", "a high net upvote score, suggesting that a large number of users found", "opposed to answers that question this premise. Questions on racism, sexism, etc., are", "users in the comments section, I added an additional section to the answer,", "leave the post in a better state than the original version; and *", "Nevertheless, in this instance my answer has been edited down to a shell", "answer should not be heavily edited after receiving substantial numbers of votes, I", "large number of upvotes and a few downvotes (approx +50 net upvotes); (2)" ]
[ "moderation workload for this site is not too burdensome, but having one more", "peaks at the office. Since there is no urgency, before starting an election,", "aspects of the moderator activity, but if you have further questions, please don't", "has work peaks at the office. Since there is no urgency, before starting", "but having one more moderator on the team would allow a better redistribution", "is no urgency, before starting an election, we would like to gauge the", "the community to see if there is a reasonable number of potential candidates", "community to see if there is a reasonable number of potential candidates to", "an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the moderator activity, but if", "the workload when someone has work peaks at the office. Since there is", "work peaks at the office. Since there is no urgency, before starting an", "moderator activity, but if you have further questions, please don't hesitate to ask", "burdensome, but having one more moderator on the team would allow a better", "having one more moderator on the team would allow a better redistribution of", "workload when someone has work peaks at the office. Since there is no", "one more moderator on the team would allow a better redistribution of the", "the moderator activity, but if you have further questions, please don't hesitate to", "running a moderator election. The moderation workload for this site is not too", "if there is a reasonable number of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In", "becoming a moderator, you're welcome to express your interest and motivation here! Indeed,", "a reasonable number of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case, the election", "not expressing it now doesn't keep you from running if there is an", "you're interested in becoming a moderator, you're welcome to express your interest and", "a better redistribution of the workload when someone has work peaks at the", "many aspects of the moderator activity, but if you have further questions, please", "if there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the moderator", "better redistribution of the workload when someone has work peaks at the office.", "it now doesn't keep you from running if there is an election. [This", "election, we would like to gauge the community to see if there is", "gauge the community to see if there is a reasonable number of potential", "candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case, the election will likely take place around", "case, the election will likely take place around fall 2021. So, if you're", "[This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the moderator activity, but if you have", "fall 2021. So, if you're interested in becoming a moderator, you're welcome to", "redistribution of the workload when someone has work peaks at the office. Since", "in becoming a moderator, you're welcome to express your interest and motivation here!", "and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now is not committing and, likewise, not", "office. Since there is no urgency, before starting an election, we would like", "covers many aspects of the moderator activity, but if you have further questions,", "workload for this site is not too burdensome, but having one more moderator", "is not too burdensome, but having one more moderator on the team would", "reasonable number of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case, the election will", "committing and, likewise, not expressing it now doesn't keep you from running if", "team would allow a better redistribution of the workload when someone has work", "doesn't keep you from running if there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers", "you from running if there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects", "there is no urgency, before starting an election, we would like to gauge", "likewise, not expressing it now doesn't keep you from running if there is", "election will likely take place around fall 2021. So, if you're interested in", "keep you from running if there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many", "an election, we would like to gauge the community to see if there", "a moderator election. The moderation workload for this site is not too burdensome,", "at the office. Since there is no urgency, before starting an election, we", "to express your interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now is not", "on the team would allow a better redistribution of the workload when someone", "more moderator on the team would allow a better redistribution of the workload", "the office. Since there is no urgency, before starting an election, we would", "interested in becoming a moderator, you're welcome to express your interest and motivation", "of running a moderator election. The moderation workload for this site is not", "election. The moderation workload for this site is not too burdensome, but having", "Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the moderator activity, but if you have further", "likely take place around fall 2021. So, if you're interested in becoming a", "starting an election, we would like to gauge the community to see if", "of the workload when someone has work peaks at the office. Since there", "like to gauge the community to see if there is a reasonable number", "welcome to express your interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now is", "number of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case, the election will likely", "expressing interest now is not committing and, likewise, not expressing it now doesn't", "too burdensome, but having one more moderator on the team would allow a", "you're welcome to express your interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now", "of the moderator activity, but if you have further questions, please don't hesitate", "would allow a better redistribution of the workload when someone has work peaks", "activity, but if you have further questions, please don't hesitate to ask here.", "to gauge the community to see if there is a reasonable number of", "The moderation workload for this site is not too burdensome, but having one", "now doesn't keep you from running if there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534)", "no urgency, before starting an election, we would like to gauge the community", "place around fall 2021. So, if you're interested in becoming a moderator, you're", "see if there is a reasonable number of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness.", "to see if there is a reasonable number of potential candidates to ensure", "interest now is not committing and, likewise, not expressing it now doesn't keep", "moderator, you're welcome to express your interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest", "this site is not too burdensome, but having one more moderator on the", "now is not committing and, likewise, not expressing it now doesn't keep you", "for this site is not too burdensome, but having one more moderator on", "before starting an election, we would like to gauge the community to see", "In case, the election will likely take place around fall 2021. So, if", "2021. So, if you're interested in becoming a moderator, you're welcome to express", "we would like to gauge the community to see if there is a", "expressing it now doesn't keep you from running if there is an election.", "moderator election. The moderation workload for this site is not too burdensome, but", "to ensure competitiveness. In case, the election will likely take place around fall", "take place around fall 2021. So, if you're interested in becoming a moderator,", "site is not too burdensome, but having one more moderator on the team", "competitiveness. In case, the election will likely take place around fall 2021. So,", "ensure competitiveness. In case, the election will likely take place around fall 2021.", "will likely take place around fall 2021. So, if you're interested in becoming", "Since there is no urgency, before starting an election, we would like to", "running if there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the", "would like to gauge the community to see if there is a reasonable", "from running if there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of", "the team would allow a better redistribution of the workload when someone has", "the election will likely take place around fall 2021. So, if you're interested", "We're thinking of running a moderator election. The moderation workload for this site", "moderator on the team would allow a better redistribution of the workload when", "around fall 2021. So, if you're interested in becoming a moderator, you're welcome", "interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now is not committing and, likewise,", "is not committing and, likewise, not expressing it now doesn't keep you from", "Indeed, expressing interest now is not committing and, likewise, not expressing it now", "motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now is not committing and, likewise, not expressing", "a moderator, you're welcome to express your interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing", "thinking of running a moderator election. The moderation workload for this site is", "urgency, before starting an election, we would like to gauge the community to", "potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case, the election will likely take place", "your interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now is not committing and,", "there is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the moderator activity,", "is a reasonable number of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case, the", "here! Indeed, expressing interest now is not committing and, likewise, not expressing it", "there is a reasonable number of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case,", "when someone has work peaks at the office. Since there is no urgency,", "So, if you're interested in becoming a moderator, you're welcome to express your", "allow a better redistribution of the workload when someone has work peaks at", "and, likewise, not expressing it now doesn't keep you from running if there", "election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the moderator activity, but if you", "someone has work peaks at the office. Since there is no urgency, before", "of potential candidates to ensure competitiveness. In case, the election will likely take", "is an election. [This Q&A](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4534) covers many aspects of the moderator activity, but", "express your interest and motivation here! Indeed, expressing interest now is not committing", "not too burdensome, but having one more moderator on the team would allow", "if you're interested in becoming a moderator, you're welcome to express your interest", "not committing and, likewise, not expressing it now doesn't keep you from running" ]
[ "give or take time to arrive for closure), this question will be open", "option to fill out the questionnaire, and their answers will appear beneath their", "pm EDT on the same day, give or take time to arrive for", "some editorial control in the selection of the questions and may opt not", "and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you", "to moderation or the election. We exclude any suggested questions that are negatively", "If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to", "answer. If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of", "have been? * The community team may also include the following three questions", "situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have been?", "a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps", "candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll", "on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold", "questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find", "top voted questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to use", "arrive for closure), this question will be open to collect potential questions from", "of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from", "that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be", "including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under", "to be included: + How would you deal with a user who produced", "of generic questions. The following two questions are guaranteed to be included: +", "will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is", "any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a", "the community** provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned", "questionnaire, and their answers will appear beneath their intro statements. + This is", "work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or", "syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for the", "do you feel about that? + In what way do you feel that", "not to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or", "session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what", "question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. We exclude", "or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have", "an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates", "moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or", "is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community", "your opinion, what do moderators do? + A diamond will be attached to", "tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. We exclude any suggested questions", "different light. How do you feel about that? + In what way do", "opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? * At the start of", "voted questions submitted by the community provided in this thread, to use in", "their answers will appear beneath their intro statements. + This is not the", "a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it", "scored. + We will post the final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates", "the questionnaire, and their answers will appear beneath their intro statements. + This", "supply enough questions. + In your opinion, what do moderators do? + A", "the following three questions if the community doesn’t supply enough questions. + In", "doesn’t supply enough questions. + In your opinion, what do moderators do? +", "and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). > > > --- Academia Stack Exchange", "an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we will be holding", "the selection of the questions and may opt not to select a question", "large number of arguments/flags from comments? + How would you handle a situation", "potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this question", "have the option to fill out the questionnaire, and their answers will appear", "that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are", "+ In your opinion, what do moderators do? + A diamond will be", "we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an", "Please only post one question per answer. * If your question contains a", "> > *The purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the", "the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like", "the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for", "community doesn’t supply enough questions. + In your opinion, what do moderators do?", "a small selection of generic questions. The following two questions are guaranteed to", "you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per", "questions are guaranteed to be included: + How would you deal with a", "it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). > > > --- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for an", "in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control", "or take time to arrive for closure), this question will be open to", "live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). > > > --- Academia Stack", "this question will be open to collect potential questions from the users of", "questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question", "8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community* provided in this", "irrelevant to moderation or the election. We exclude any suggested questions that are", "be open to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post", "make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?", "to this question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates.", "attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions,", "and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light.", "submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to use in addition to", "of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: * Until the", "This will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions", "mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have been? * The community", "with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is", "election. We exclude any suggested questions that are negatively scored. + We will", "be providing a small selection of generic questions. The following two questions are", "the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be", "the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: ", "for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it", "candidates. Please only post one question per answer. If your question contains", "as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. ", "+ This is not the only option that users have for gathering information", "use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial", "provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this", "you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers,", "where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have been? ", "the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions", "Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: * Until the nomination phase,", "valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?", "questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to use in addition", "will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to", "beneath their intro statements. + This is not the only option that users", "two questions are guaranteed to be included: + How would you deal with", "you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments.", "of the questions and may opt not to select a question that is", "of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would", "in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions.", "nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on", "feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to", "10k or 20k rep? * At the start of the nomination phase, the", "a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k", "hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or", "following two questions are guaranteed to be included: + How would you deal", "thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live,", "you will do will be seen under a different light. How do you", "question will be open to collect potential questions from the users of the", "is scheduled for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we", "is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. We exclude any suggested", "exclude any suggested questions that are negatively scored. + We will post the", "the questions and may opt not to select a question that is tangential", "community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation", "only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community,", "the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option to fill out the questionnaire,", "may also include the following three questions if the community doesn’t supply enough", "Community Team will select *up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted", "time to arrive for closure), this question will be open to collect potential", "a different light. How do you feel about that? + In what way", "example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions,", "only post one question per answer. If your question contains a link,", "to arrive for closure), this question will be open to collect potential questions", "Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free", "purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire", "intro statements. + This is not the only option that users have for", "questions if the community doesn’t supply enough questions. + In your opinion, what", "guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection of the questions", "would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you", "selection of the questions and may opt not to select a question that", "`[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire.", "do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as", "for closure), this question will be open to collect potential questions from the", "clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions", "team may also include the following three questions if the community doesn’t supply", "The community team may also include the following three questions if the community", "the community doesn’t supply enough questions. + In your opinion, what do moderators", "option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you", "gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for", "questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific", "selection of generic questions. The following two questions are guaranteed to be included:", "opinion, what do moderators do? + A diamond will be attached to everything", "like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. ", "that you are running into currently. We, the Community Team, will be", "answers will appear beneath their intro statements. + This is not the only", "Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection", "final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option to fill", "We will post the final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have", "said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do", "now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). > > > --- Academia", "in the selection of the questions and may opt not to select a", "that are negatively scored. + We will post the final questionnaire on the", "with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community", "collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this", "that are specific to your community and issues that you are running into", "arguments/flags from comments? + How would you handle a situation where another mod", "collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may", "generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? + How would you handle", "user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate", "will select up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the", "opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on", "live chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications", "in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will", "[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire).** > > > --- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for an election", "diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in the", "week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with", "20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or take", "closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have been? * The community team", "questions. + In your opinion, what do moderators do? + A diamond will", "the final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option to", "questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection of the questions and", "statements. + This is not the only option that users have for gathering", "are specific to your community and issues that you are running into currently.", "The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). > >", "Until the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm", "will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The following two questions", "community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session", "answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? +", "+ We will post the final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will", "deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but", "+ In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make", "you feel about that? + In what way do you feel that being", "the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As a", "to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask", "your question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that", "the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of the", "to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers to", "not the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates. As", "questions. The following two questions are guaranteed to be included: + How would", "from comments? + How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc.", "editorial control in the selection of the questions and may opt not to", "> > --- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for an election [next week,", "make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a", "do? + A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have", "if the community doesn’t supply enough questions. + In your opinion, what do", "--- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In", "be attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including", "will appear beneath their intro statements. + This is not the only option", "We exclude any suggested questions that are negatively scored. + We will post", "voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09", "it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect", "reserve some editorial control in the selection of the questions and may opt", "take time to arrive for closure), this question will be open to collect", "pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely", "feel shouldn’t have been? * The community team may also include the following", "that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply", "the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select *up to", "Stack Exchange is scheduled for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with", "opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that", "appear beneath their intro statements. + This is not the only option that", "you feel shouldn’t have been? The community team may also include the", "with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends", "and their answers will appear beneath their intro statements. + This is not", "community and issues that you are running into currently. * We, the Community", "what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback", "would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer.", "about that? + In what way do you feel that being a moderator", "this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We", "on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option to fill out the", "questions from the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing", "connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This", "2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give", "to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that you", "of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select *up to 8 of", "or irrelevant to moderation or the election. We exclude any suggested questions that", "community team may also include the following three questions if the community doesn’t", "holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members", "easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. This is a perfect opportunity", "running into currently. * We, the Community Team, will be providing a small", "way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective", "> > > --- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for an election [next", "out the questionnaire, and their answers will appear beneath their intro statements. +", "to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? * At the start of the", "perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and issues", "a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. We", "this question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please", "UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or take time", "that you feel shouldn’t have been? * The community team may also include", "you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel", "but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? + How", "questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option to fill out", "questions that are specific to your community and issues that you are running", "a question that you feel shouldn’t have been? * The community team may", "If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as", "community** provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2", "This is not the only option that users have for gathering information on", "answers to this question containing any questions you would like to ask the", "currently. * We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of", "another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have been? * The", "their intro statements. + This is not the only option that users have", "the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire).*", "question that you feel shouldn’t have been? The community team may also", "as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? * At the start", "to your community and issues that you are running into currently. * We,", "questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a comment", "20k rep? * At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team", "post the final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option", "or feedback about this process, feel free to post as a comment here.", "is not the only option that users have for gathering information on candidates.", "for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to,", "any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post one", "stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags", "handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t", "page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option to fill out the questionnaire, and their", "a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have", "it’ll work: Until the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC,", "still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates", "addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in", "ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. * If your", "In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you", "are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your", "candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community to pose", "that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election. We exclude any", "be an opportunity for members of the community to pose questions to the", "produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large", "at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or", "Candidates will have the option to fill out the questionnaire, and their answers", "that? + In what way do you feel that being a moderator will", "How do you feel about that? + In what way do you feel", "the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection", "will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that?", "We reserve some editorial control in the selection of the questions and may", "finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are", "* We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic", "may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire).** > > > --- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled", "from the users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any", "the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The", "also include the following three questions if the community doesn’t supply enough questions.", "rep? * At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will", "Exchange is scheduled for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that,", "to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some", "the top voted questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread, to", "will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k", "opt not to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation", "+ How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question", "scheduled for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we will", "to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers", "please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for", "In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates.", "been? * The community team may also include the following three questions if", "questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you", "your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided", "+ A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said", "to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is", "you are running into currently. * We, the Community Team, will be providing", "Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How do", "for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to", "reaching 10k or 20k rep? * At the start of the nomination phase,", "the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that", "+ How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream", "[next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A", "to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community provided in", "moderation or the election. We exclude any suggested questions that are negatively scored.", "A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in", "select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the election.", "generic questions. The following two questions are guaranteed to be included: + How", "up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community provided", "questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). >", "control in the selection of the questions and may opt not to select", "suggested questions that are negatively scored. + We will post the final questionnaire", "from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or", "> --- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4).", "perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If you have any", "start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8", "ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A.", "is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). > > > ---", "seen under a different light. How do you feel about that? + In", "transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice", "the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel", "thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve", "to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the", "* This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to", "a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number", "being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching", "nomination phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of the top", "phase, the Community Team will select up to 8 of the top voted", "[Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the option to fill out the questionnaire, and", "a large number of arguments/flags from comments? + How would you handle a", "members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic", "As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live", "* At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select", "moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: * Until the nomination", "of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished", "do moderators do? + A diamond will be attached to everything you say", "election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we will be holding a", "past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen", "aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection of", "> *The purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire.", "post one question per answer. If your question contains a link, please", "effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? * At the", "one question per answer. * If your question contains a link, please use", "and issues that you are running into currently. * We, the Community Team,", "that will make it easier for transcribing for the finished questionnaire. * This", "the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the community to", "open to collect potential questions from the users of the site. Post answers", "for members of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the", "simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? * At the start of the nomination", "light. How do you feel about that? + In what way do you", "of the top voted questions submitted by the community** provided in this thread,", "moderators do? + A diamond will be attached to everything you say and", "closure), this question will be open to collect potential questions from the users", "will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity", "or 20k rep? * At the start of the nomination phase, the Community", "negatively scored. + We will post the final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4).", "day, give or take time to arrive for closure), this question will be", "link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier", "questions that are negatively scored. + We will post the final questionnaire on", "is provided in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about", "may opt not to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to", "who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a", "answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different", "number of arguments/flags from comments? + How would you handle a situation where", "include the following three questions if the community doesn’t supply enough questions. +", "2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the", "three questions if the community doesn’t supply enough questions. + In your opinion,", "of the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of", "for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to ask further", "to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the", "will post the final questionnaire on the [Election page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). Candidates will have the", "(so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same", "information on candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example,", "a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to", "what do moderators do? + A diamond will be attached to everything you", "How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that", "you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? ", "2 guaranteed questions. We reserve some editorial control in the selection of the", "the same day, give or take time to arrive for closure), this question", "are guaranteed to be included: + How would you deal with a user", "Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of the", "questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a", "the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how", "everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and", "users have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still", "the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT", "more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep? At", "questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary.", "use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make it easier for transcribing", "find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire).** > > > --- Academia Stack Exchange is scheduled for", "and may opt not to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant", "is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so,", "per answer. If your question contains a link, please use the syntax", "for the finished questionnaire. * This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions", "candidates. As a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a", "or the election. We exclude any suggested questions that are negatively scored. +", "be included: + How would you deal with a user who produced a", "into currently. * We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection", "The purpose of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The", "questionnaire is now live, and you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire). > > >", "what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more", "Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The following", "have for gathering information on candidates. As a community, you are still free", "with that, we will be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will", "topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: * Until", "this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now", "question per answer. If your question contains a link, please use the", "contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will make", "will have the option to fill out the questionnaire, and their answers will", "to the candidates on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s", "are negatively scored. + We will post the final questionnaire on the [Election", "to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and you", "select up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by the community", "you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed", "EDT on the same day, give or take time to arrive for closure),", "Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions. The following two", "tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? + How would", "questions and may opt not to select a question that is tangential or", "the Community Team will select *up to 8 of the top voted questions", "was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is now live, and", "are running into currently. We, the Community Team, will be providing a", "voice questions that are specific to your community and issues that you are", "you have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post", "issues that you are running into currently. * We, the Community Team, will", "At the start of the nomination phase, the Community Team will select up", "to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments? + How would you", "the option to fill out the questionnaire, and their answers will appear beneath", "fill out the questionnaire, and their answers will appear beneath their intro statements.", "comments? + How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a", "provided in this thread, to use in addition to the aforementioned 2 guaranteed", "any suggested questions that are negatively scored. + We will post the final", "the election. We exclude any suggested questions that are negatively scored. + We", "a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your community and", "until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day,", "chat session with your candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from", "of this thread was to collect questions for the questionnaire. The questionnaire is", "by the community provided in this thread, to use in addition to the", "users of the site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you", "you may find it [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4#questionnaire).** > > > --- Academia Stack Exchange is", "how it’ll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z", "site. Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like to", "* The community team may also include the following three questions if the", "do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about", "be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that? +", "you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat session with", "on the same day, give or take time to arrive for closure), this", "will do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel", "* If your question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`,", "or 4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or take time to", "question containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only", "for an election [next week, 2021-08-09](https://academia.stackexchange.com/election/4). In connection with that, we will be", "to ask the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. * If", "enough questions. + In your opinion, what do moderators do? + A diamond", "free to, for example, hold a live chat session with your candidates to", "containing any questions you would like to ask the candidates. Please only post", "guaranteed to be included: + How would you deal with a user who", "to select a question that is tangential or irrelevant to moderation or the", "following three questions if the community doesn’t supply enough questions. + In your", "will be open to collect potential questions from the users of the site.", "of arguments/flags from comments? + How would you handle a situation where another", "providing a small selection of generic questions. The following two questions are guaranteed", "a community, you are still free to, for example, hold a live chat", "your community and issues that you are running into currently. * We, the", "small selection of generic questions. The following two questions are guaranteed to be", "question contains a link, please use the syntax of `[text](link)`, as that will", "be holding a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for", "the candidates. Please only post one question per answer. * If your question", "Post answers to this question containing any questions you would like to ask", "will be attached to everything you say and have said in the past,", "phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00 pm EDT on the", "would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable", "4:00 pm EDT on the same day, give or take time to arrive", "* Until the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at 20:00:00Z UTC, or 4:00", "The following two questions are guaranteed to be included: + How would you", "to fill out the questionnaire, and their answers will appear beneath their intro", "comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How", "We, the Community Team, will be providing a small selection of generic questions.", "feel about that? + In what way do you feel that being a", "Here’s how it’ll work: * Until the nomination phase, (so, until 2021-08-09 at", "How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of", "candidates to ask further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in", "have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will", "In your opinion, what do moderators do? + A diamond will be attached", "further questions, or perhaps clarifications from what is provided in the Q&A. If", "under a different light. How do you feel about that? + In what", "on the topic of moderation. Participation is completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work:", "specific to your community and issues that you are running into currently. ", "say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything", "completely voluntary. Here’s how it’ll work: Until the nomination phase, (so, until", "a Q&A with the candidates. This will be an opportunity for members of", "Team will select *up to 8 of the top voted questions submitted by", "the community to pose questions to the candidates on the topic of moderation.", "steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of", "same day, give or take time to arrive for closure), this question will", "This is a perfect opportunity to voice questions that are specific to your", "have any questions or feedback about this process, feel free to post as", "shouldn’t have been? The community team may also include the following three", "in the Q&A. If you have any questions or feedback about this process,", "included: + How would you deal with a user who produced a steady" ]
[ "a question that makes an assumption I disagree with or think might be", "claim or suggest that the question is based on a misconception, wrong assessment", "Table of Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges by what the false premise", "by the asker is challenged by the answer or comment I want to", "should I vote to close the question or do nothing at all? This", "at all? This is called a *frame challenge:* I claim or suggest that", "I disagree with or think might be wrong. How do I best inform", "a situation, or similar. The frame set by the asker is challenged by", "* [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979)", "is based on a misconception, wrong assessment of a situation, or similar. The", "new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table of Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges by what", "the false premise is about: * [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978)", "but drastic deviations will be moderated.* It is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947)", "post a comment or an answer, or should I vote to close the", "and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is a lot of leeway, but drastic", "a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask). ### Table of Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges by", "drastic deviations will be moderated.* It is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and", "is called a frame challenge:* I claim or suggest that the question is", "similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong", "will be moderated.* It is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further", "practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is a lot of leeway, but", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask). ###", "assessment of a situation, or similar. The frame set by the asker is", "comment I want to post. This FAQ is mostly a set of guidelines", "be wrong. How do I best inform the asker of this? Do I", "mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want", "with or think might be wrong. How do I best inform the asker", "or comment I want to post. This FAQ is mostly a set of", "### Table of Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges by what the false", "propose changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table of Contents We primarily", "[ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table of Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges", "posted a question that makes an assumption I disagree with or think might", "by the answer or comment I want to post. This FAQ is mostly", "a lot of leeway, but drastic deviations will be moderated. It is mainly", "including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other traumatic events [General rules", "experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other traumatic events * [General", "individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other traumatic events ", "premise is about: [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions", "or do nothing at all? This is called a *frame challenge:* I claim", "an answer, or should I vote to close the question or do nothing", "I want to post. This FAQ is mostly a set of guidelines that", "based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to", "(XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism,", "Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges by what the false premise is about:", "that the question is based on a misconception, wrong assessment of a situation,", "I best inform the asker of this? Do I post a comment or", "is mostly a set of guidelines that should give an idea of best", "[Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) ", "or an answer, or should I vote to close the question or do", "disagree with or think might be wrong. How do I best inform the", "further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose changes, please [ask a new", "all? This is called a frame challenge:* I claim or suggest that the", "set of guidelines that should give an idea of best practices and avoid", "on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose", "inform the asker of this? Do I post a comment or an answer,", "question or do nothing at all? This is called a *frame challenge:* I", "the question or do nothing at all? This is called a *frame challenge:", "of best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is a lot of", "It is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If", "the question is based on a misconception, wrong assessment of a situation, or", "vote to close the question or do nothing at all? This is called", "or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) ", "moderated. It is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734).", "want to post. This FAQ is mostly a set of guidelines that should", "guidelines that should give an idea of best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation.", "The frame set by the asker is challenged by the answer or comment", "is a lot of leeway, but drastic deviations will be moderated.* It is", "discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).", "the asker is challenged by the answer or comment I want to post.", "changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table of Contents We primarily distinguish", "This is called a *frame challenge:* I claim or suggest that the question", "situation, or similar. The frame set by the asker is challenged by the", "aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including", "[Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of", "experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other traumatic events * [General rules of", "was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose changes, please [ask a", "is challenged by the answer or comment I want to post. This FAQ", "confrontation. There often is a lot of leeway, but drastic deviations will be", "frame challenge:* I claim or suggest that the question is based on a", "answer or comment I want to post. This FAQ is mostly a set", "frame challenges by what the false premise is about: [Misconceptions about academic", "[Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of", "unnecessary confrontation. There often is a lot of leeway, but drastic deviations will", "problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination,", "wrong assessment of a situation, or similar. The frame set by the asker", "this? Do I post a comment or an answer, or should I vote", "idea of best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is a lot", "about: * [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions about off-topic", "lot of leeway, but drastic deviations will be moderated.* It is mainly based", "and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose changes, please [ask", "procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal (XY", "I vote to close the question or do nothing at all? This is", "or similar. The frame set by the asker is challenged by the answer", "asker is challenged by the answer or comment I want to post. This", "This FAQ is mostly a set of guidelines that should give an idea", "to propose changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table of Contents We", "[Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other", "of a situation, or similar. The frame set by the asker is challenged", "There often is a lot of leeway, but drastic deviations will be moderated.", "a comment or an answer, or should I vote to close the question", "or suggest that the question is based on a misconception, wrong assessment of", "about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of individual", "should give an idea of best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often", "leeway, but drastic deviations will be moderated.* It is mainly based on [this", "false premise is about: [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) ", "norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980)", "an assumption I disagree with or think might be wrong. How do I", "or should I vote to close the question or do nothing at all?", "I post a comment or an answer, or should I vote to close", "suggest that the question is based on a misconception, wrong assessment of a", "you want to propose changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table of", "goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism,", "do I best inform the asker of this? Do I post a comment", "challenges by what the false premise is about: * [Misconceptions about academic procedures,", "of Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges by what the false premise is", "might be wrong. How do I best inform the asker of this? Do", "be moderated.* It is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed", "I claim or suggest that the question is based on a misconception, wrong", "of guidelines that should give an idea of best practices and avoid unnecessary", "on a misconception, wrong assessment of a situation, or similar. The frame set", "deviations will be moderated. It is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was", "answer, or should I vote to close the question or do nothing at", "best inform the asker of this? Do I post a comment or an", "often is a lot of leeway, but drastic deviations will be moderated. It", "[this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose changes,", "off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981)", "assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other traumatic", "that makes an assumption I disagree with or think might be wrong. How", "challenge*: I claim or suggest that the question is based on a misconception,", "please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table of Contents We primarily distinguish frame", "comment or an answer, or should I vote to close the question or", "primarily distinguish frame challenges by what the false premise is about: * [Misconceptions", "a set of guidelines that should give an idea of best practices and", "about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong", "question is based on a misconception, wrong assessment of a situation, or similar.", "avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is a lot of leeway, but drastic deviations", "set by the asker is challenged by the answer or comment I want", "a misconception, wrong assessment of a situation, or similar. The frame set by", "do nothing at all? This is called a *frame challenge:* I claim or", "misconception, wrong assessment of a situation, or similar. The frame set by the", "post. This FAQ is mostly a set of guidelines that should give an", " [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences", "mostly a set of guidelines that should give an idea of best practices", "of this? Do I post a comment or an answer, or should I", "question that makes an assumption I disagree with or think might be wrong.", "frame set by the asker is challenged by the answer or comment I", "discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you want to propose changes, please", "the asker of this? Do I post a comment or an answer, or", "similar. The frame set by the asker is challenged by the answer or", "of leeway, but drastic deviations will be moderated.* It is mainly based on", "the answer or comment I want to post. This FAQ is mostly a", "* [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal (XY problem)](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4980) * [Wrong assessments", "* [Wrong assessments of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table of Contents We primarily distinguish frame challenges by what the", "wrong. How do I best inform the asker of this? Do I post", "challenged by the answer or comment I want to post. This FAQ is", "to post. This FAQ is mostly a set of guidelines that should give", "academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions about off-topic aspects](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4979) * [Wrong goal", "to close the question or do nothing at all? This is called a", "close the question or do nothing at all? This is called a *frame", "assumption I disagree with or think might be wrong. How do I best", "nothing at all? This is called a frame challenge: I claim or suggest", "is mainly based on [this discussion](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4947) and was further discussed [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4967/7734). If you", "distinguish frame challenges by what the false premise is about: * [Misconceptions about", "We primarily distinguish frame challenges by what the false premise is about: ", "called a frame challenge:* I claim or suggest that the question is based", "by what the false premise is about: * [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms,", "an idea of best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is a", "think might be wrong. How do I best inform the asker of this?", "makes an assumption I disagree with or think might be wrong. How do", "give an idea of best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is", "of individual experiences](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4981) including experiences of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other traumatic events", "Do I post a comment or an answer, or should I vote to", "How do I best inform the asker of this? Do I post a", "want to propose changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table of Contents", "of sexism, racism, discrimination, and other traumatic events * [General rules of thumb](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4977)", "based on a misconception, wrong assessment of a situation, or similar. The frame", "asker of this? Do I post a comment or an answer, or should", "a *frame challenge:* I claim or suggest that the question is based on", "that should give an idea of best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There", "what the false premise is about: * [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or", "FAQ is mostly a set of guidelines that should give an idea of", "If you want to propose changes, please [ask a new question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/ask).* ### Table", "best practices and avoid unnecessary confrontation. There often is a lot of leeway,", "or think might be wrong. How do I best inform the asker of", "is about: * [Misconceptions about academic procedures, norms, or similar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/4978) * [Misconceptions about", "Somebody posted a question that makes an assumption I disagree with or think" ]
[ "we don't have (as some others do) a tag for resource-request, which might", "attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would a", "it is about devices for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about", "This one is being flagged for closure, but it is about devices for", "get closed as Shopping Questions. But the OP, here, was asking how to", "certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for", "for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying things. But not", "might form a different category of acceptable question. But one difficulty, if providing", "one difficulty, if providing this category is considered valuable, is to make it", "not for a list of things. So, my view is that isn't really", "into resource requests. What do folks think about such questions that are \"not", "considered valuable, is to make it known or to somehow \"map\" close requests", "ask for ways to do things? I would, personally, like to find a", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly", "a tag for resource-request, which might form a different category of acceptable question.", "new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one", "\"listy\" and certainly about buying things. But not about academic programs and their", "difficulty, if providing this category is considered valuable, is to make it known", "would, personally, like to find a way to allow them for the benefit", "them for the benefit of the OP but in a way that avoids", "somehow \"map\" close requests into resource requests. What do folks think about such", "Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying things. But not about academic programs and", "form a different category of acceptable question. But one difficulty, if providing this", "acceptable question. But one difficulty, if providing this category is considered valuable, is", "that doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly has", "that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged for closure, but it is about devices", "do things? I would, personally, like to find a way to allow them", "is that isn't really a shopping question at all. However, we don't have", "to do things? I would, personally, like to find a way to allow", "but it is about devices for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly", "questions, [like this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173138/75368) get closed as Shopping Questions. But the OP, here,", "my view is that isn't really a shopping question at all. However, we", "such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged for closure, but", "others do) a tag for resource-request, which might form a different category of", "it certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate", "category is considered valuable, is to make it known or to somehow \"map\"", "the OP, here, was asking how to get something done, not for a", "to get something done, not for a list of things. So, my view", "\"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being", "\"not quite\" shopping but ask for ways to do things? I would, personally,", "What do folks think about such questions that are \"not quite\" shopping but", "Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged for closure, but it is", "closed as Shopping Questions. But the OP, here, was asking how to get", "like to find a way to allow them for the benefit of the", "is considered valuable, is to make it known or to somehow \"map\" close", "to make it known or to somehow \"map\" close requests into resource requests.", "However, we don't have (as some others do) a tag for resource-request, which", "is to make it known or to somehow \"map\" close requests into resource", "but in a way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368)", "be appropriate for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged", "for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged for closure,", "or to somehow \"map\" close requests into resource requests. What do folks think", "to allow them for the benefit of the OP but in a way", "personally, like to find a way to allow them for the benefit of", "to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly has no \"best\" answer.", "view is that isn't really a shopping question at all. However, we don't", "about such questions that are \"not quite\" shopping but ask for ways to", "[like this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173138/75368) get closed as Shopping Questions. But the OP, here, was", "about devices for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying things.", "question at all. However, we don't have (as some others do) a tag", "no \"best\" answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things?", "quite\" shopping but ask for ways to do things? I would, personally, like", "how to get something done, not for a list of things. So, my", "of the OP but in a way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is", "folks think about such questions that are \"not quite\" shopping but ask for", "known or to somehow \"map\" close requests into resource requests. What do folks", "done, not for a list of things. So, my view is that isn't", "close votes. But it certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would a new tag", "make it known or to somehow \"map\" close requests into resource requests. What", "for resource-request, which might form a different category of acceptable question. But one", "something done, not for a list of things. So, my view is that", "a shopping question at all. However, we don't have (as some others do)", "avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be", "in a way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that", "OP but in a way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\"", "[another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But", "votes. But it certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\"", "\"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would a new", "one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173138/75368) get closed as Shopping Questions. But the OP, here, was asking how", "category of acceptable question. But one difficulty, if providing this category is considered", "valuable, is to make it known or to somehow \"map\" close requests into", "answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things? Yet [another", "such questions that are \"not quite\" shopping but ask for ways to do", "the OP but in a way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another", "one is being flagged for closure, but it is about devices for doing", "question. But one difficulty, if providing this category is considered valuable, is to", "allow them for the benefit of the OP but in a way that", "the benefit of the OP but in a way that avoids \"listy\" answers.", "at all. However, we don't have (as some others do) a tag for", "a way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't", "shopping but ask for ways to do things? I would, personally, like to", "for ways to do things? I would, personally, like to find a way", "that are \"not quite\" shopping but ask for ways to do things? I", "but ask for ways to do things? I would, personally, like to find", "Some questions, [like this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173138/75368) get closed as Shopping Questions. But the OP,", "really a shopping question at all. However, we don't have (as some others", "tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is", "devices for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying things. But", "this category is considered valuable, is to make it known or to somehow", "way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem", "are \"not quite\" shopping but ask for ways to do things? I would,", "closure, but it is about devices for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and", "get something done, not for a list of things. So, my view is", "(as some others do) a tag for resource-request, which might form a different", "requests. What do folks think about such questions that are \"not quite\" shopping", "resource-request, which might form a different category of acceptable question. But one difficulty,", "things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged for closure, but it", "do) a tag for resource-request, which might form a different category of acceptable", "\"listy\" answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be attracting", "for a list of things. So, my view is that isn't really a", "is about devices for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying", "a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This", "do folks think about such questions that are \"not quite\" shopping but ask", "if providing this category is considered valuable, is to make it known or", "asking how to get something done, not for a list of things. So,", "providing this category is considered valuable, is to make it known or to", "questions that are \"not quite\" shopping but ask for ways to do things?", "work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying things. But not about academic programs", "tag for resource-request, which might form a different category of acceptable question. But", "a way to allow them for the benefit of the OP but in", "is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes.", "find a way to allow them for the benefit of the OP but", "it known or to somehow \"map\" close requests into resource requests. What do", "this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173138/75368) get closed as Shopping Questions. But the OP, here, was asking", "here, was asking how to get something done, not for a list of", "isn't really a shopping question at all. However, we don't have (as some", "seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly has no \"best\"", "doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly has no", "some others do) a tag for resource-request, which might form a different category", "is being flagged for closure, but it is about devices for doing academic", "all. However, we don't have (as some others do) a tag for resource-request,", "has no \"best\" answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such", "list of things. So, my view is that isn't really a shopping question", "to find a way to allow them for the benefit of the OP", "way to allow them for the benefit of the OP but in a", "Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368).", "as Shopping Questions. But the OP, here, was asking how to get something", "things. So, my view is that isn't really a shopping question at all.", "resource requests. What do folks think about such questions that are \"not quite\"", "have (as some others do) a tag for resource-request, which might form a", "But one difficulty, if providing this category is considered valuable, is to make", "\"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it", "appropriate for such things? Yet [another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged for", "But it certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be", "\"best\" answer. Would a new tag \"resource-request\" be appropriate for such things? Yet", "[another question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173312/75368). This one is being flagged for closure, but it is about", "requests into resource requests. What do folks think about such questions that are", "that isn't really a shopping question at all. However, we don't have (as", "for the benefit of the OP but in a way that avoids \"listy\"", "for closure, but it is about devices for doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\"", "different category of acceptable question. But one difficulty, if providing this category is", "So, my view is that isn't really a shopping question at all. However,", "things? I would, personally, like to find a way to allow them for", "be attracting \"shopping\" close votes. But it certainly has no \"best\" answer. Would", "to somehow \"map\" close requests into resource requests. What do folks think about", "flagged for closure, but it is about devices for doing academic work. Certainly", "\"map\" close requests into resource requests. What do folks think about such questions", "which might form a different category of acceptable question. But one difficulty, if", "shopping question at all. However, we don't have (as some others do) a", "Questions. But the OP, here, was asking how to get something done, not", "But the OP, here, was asking how to get something done, not for", "think about such questions that are \"not quite\" shopping but ask for ways", "was asking how to get something done, not for a list of things.", "I would, personally, like to find a way to allow them for the", "and certainly about buying things. But not about academic programs and their comparisons.", "Shopping Questions. But the OP, here, was asking how to get something done,", "answers. Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\"", "of things. So, my view is that isn't really a shopping question at", "academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying things. But not about academic", "a list of things. So, my view is that isn't really a shopping", "close requests into resource requests. What do folks think about such questions that", "doing academic work. Certainly \"listy\" and certainly about buying things. But not about", "don't have (as some others do) a tag for resource-request, which might form", "benefit of the OP but in a way that avoids \"listy\" answers. Here", "Here is [another \"Listy\" question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/173201/75368) that doesn't seem to be attracting \"shopping\" close", "being flagged for closure, but it is about devices for doing academic work.", "OP, here, was asking how to get something done, not for a list", "ways to do things? I would, personally, like to find a way to", "a different category of acceptable question. But one difficulty, if providing this category", "of acceptable question. But one difficulty, if providing this category is considered valuable," ]
[ "similar question is open? Sure, the other question was posted 9 years ago,", "allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since they belong to the same type of", "to ask for my question to be opened, for my benefit, as well", "I would like to ask for my question to be opened, for my", "question was posted 9 years ago, but I don't think it should have", "[my question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/173940/where-to-place-a-variable-legend-in-a-math-thesis) closed as \"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure, the", "for that question than the Academia? And if the other question should be", "posted 9 years ago, but I don't think it should have been closed", "have been closed if it were asked today: it has evidently been very", "benefit, as well as for the benefit of others who might be interested", "Consequently, I would like to ask for my question to be opened, for", "is open? Sure, the other question was posted 9 years ago, but I", "too, since they belong to the same type of questions, even if mine", "other stackexchange forum that would be more suitable for that question than the", "don't think it should have been closed if it were asked today: it", "question should be allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since they belong to the", "the other question was posted 9 years ago, but I don't think it", "other question was posted 9 years ago, but I don't think it should", "to many people, and is there any other stackexchange forum that would be", "mine concerns a more niche subject matter than a glossary. Consequently, I would", "should have been closed if it were asked today: it has evidently been", "they belong to the same type of questions, even if mine concerns a", "but I don't think it should have been closed if it were asked", "people, and is there any other stackexchange forum that would be more suitable", "to be opened, for my benefit, as well as for the benefit of", "was posted 9 years ago, but I don't think it should have been", "very useful to many people, and is there any other stackexchange forum that", "closed if it were asked today: it has evidently been very useful to", "Sure, the other question was posted 9 years ago, but I don't think", "should be allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since they belong to the same", "even if mine concerns a more niche subject matter than a glossary. Consequently,", "the Academia? And if the other question should be allowed, shouldn't mine be", "like to ask for my question to be opened, for my benefit, as", "be opened, for my benefit, as well as for the benefit of others", "mine be too, since they belong to the same type of questions, even", "been closed if it were asked today: it has evidently been very useful", "glossary. Consequently, I would like to ask for my question to be opened,", "question is open? Sure, the other question was posted 9 years ago, but", "questions, even if mine concerns a more niche subject matter than a glossary.", "ask for my question to be opened, for my benefit, as well as", "years ago, but I don't think it should have been closed if it", "it were asked today: it has evidently been very useful to many people,", "stackexchange forum that would be more suitable for that question than the Academia?", "for my question to be opened, for my benefit, as well as for", "and is there any other stackexchange forum that would be more suitable for", "concerns a more niche subject matter than a glossary. Consequently, I would like", "today: it has evidently been very useful to many people, and is there", "question to be opened, for my benefit, as well as for the benefit", "there any other stackexchange forum that would be more suitable for that question", "belong to the same type of questions, even if mine concerns a more", "Academia? And if the other question should be allowed, shouldn't mine be too,", "shouldn't mine be too, since they belong to the same type of questions,", "And if the other question should be allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since", "a glossary. Consequently, I would like to ask for my question to be", "my question to be opened, for my benefit, as well as for the", "if mine concerns a more niche subject matter than a glossary. Consequently, I", "Why was [my question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/173940/where-to-place-a-variable-legend-in-a-math-thesis) closed as \"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open?", "many people, and is there any other stackexchange forum that would be more", "as well as for the benefit of others who might be interested in", "think it should have been closed if it were asked today: it has", "useful to many people, and is there any other stackexchange forum that would", "that question than the Academia? And if the other question should be allowed,", "a more niche subject matter than a glossary. Consequently, I would like to", "any other stackexchange forum that would be more suitable for that question than", "than the Academia? And if the other question should be allowed, shouldn't mine", "be more suitable for that question than the Academia? And if the other", "as for the benefit of others who might be interested in this topic.", "matter than a glossary. Consequently, I would like to ask for my question", "niche subject matter than a glossary. Consequently, I would like to ask for", "\"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure, the other question was posted", "that would be more suitable for that question than the Academia? And if", "whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure, the other question was posted 9", "forum that would be more suitable for that question than the Academia? And", "the other question should be allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since they belong", "more niche subject matter than a glossary. Consequently, I would like to ask", "since they belong to the same type of questions, even if mine concerns", "I don't think it should have been closed if it were asked today:", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/173940/where-to-place-a-variable-legend-in-a-math-thesis) closed as \"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure, the other", "been very useful to many people, and is there any other stackexchange forum", "has evidently been very useful to many people, and is there any other", "open? Sure, the other question was posted 9 years ago, but I don't", "if the other question should be allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since they", "9 years ago, but I don't think it should have been closed if", "as \"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure, the other question was", "if it were asked today: it has evidently been very useful to many", "more suitable for that question than the Academia? And if the other question", "question than the Academia? And if the other question should be allowed, shouldn't", "was [my question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/173940/where-to-place-a-variable-legend-in-a-math-thesis) closed as \"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure,", "to the same type of questions, even if mine concerns a more niche", "type of questions, even if mine concerns a more niche subject matter than", "my benefit, as well as for the benefit of others who might be", "opened, for my benefit, as well as for the benefit of others who", "the same type of questions, even if mine concerns a more niche subject", "asked today: it has evidently been very useful to many people, and is", "for my benefit, as well as for the benefit of others who might", "same type of questions, even if mine concerns a more niche subject matter", "suitable for that question than the Academia? And if the other question should", "ago, but I don't think it should have been closed if it were", "would like to ask for my question to be opened, for my benefit,", "well as for the benefit of others who might be interested in this", "it has evidently been very useful to many people, and is there any", "be too, since they belong to the same type of questions, even if", "other question should be allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since they belong to", "it should have been closed if it were asked today: it has evidently", "closed as \"off-topic\", whereas [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure, the other question", "would be more suitable for that question than the Academia? And if the", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/5569/111347) similar question is open? Sure, the other question was posted 9 years", "be allowed, shouldn't mine be too, since they belong to the same type", "evidently been very useful to many people, and is there any other stackexchange", "is there any other stackexchange forum that would be more suitable for that", "of questions, even if mine concerns a more niche subject matter than a", "subject matter than a glossary. Consequently, I would like to ask for my", "than a glossary. Consequently, I would like to ask for my question to", "were asked today: it has evidently been very useful to many people, and" ]
[ "recent example is the following: [Would these be adequate grounds for severe reprimand", "the following: [Would these be adequate grounds for severe reprimand from my undergraduate", "these be adequate grounds for severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older", "Recently I realised that with some regularity there seem to be question of", "seem to be obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct which happend many years", "there a generic question about when to worry about alleged misconduct after many", "acedemic one. Is there a generic question about when to worry about alleged", "severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these", "generic question about when to worry about alleged misconduct after many years to", "questions, it looks like the actual problem is not an acedemic one. Is", "like the actual problem is not an acedemic one. Is there a generic", "people who seem to be obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct which happend", "with some regularity there seem to be question of people who seem to", "Is there a generic question about when to worry about alleged misconduct after", "for severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of", "[Would these be adequate grounds for severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An", "to be question of people who seem to be obsessively worried about some", "about some alleged misconduct which happend many years ago. A very recent example", "be obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct which happend many years ago. A", "about alleged misconduct after many years to which these could be marked as", "example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions, it looks like the actual problem is", "looks like the actual problem is not an acedemic one. Is there a", "program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions, it looks like the", "question of people who seem to be obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct", "alleged misconduct which happend many years ago. A very recent example is the", "which happend many years ago. A very recent example is the following: [Would", "when to worry about alleged misconduct after many years to which these could", "of people who seem to be obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct which", "be adequate grounds for severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions).", "example is the following: [Would these be adequate grounds for severe reprimand from", "to worry about alleged misconduct after many years to which these could be", "question about when to worry about alleged misconduct after many years to which", "grounds for severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most", "actual problem is not an acedemic one. Is there a generic question about", "realised that with some regularity there seem to be question of people who", "In most of these questions, it looks like the actual problem is not", "some regularity there seem to be question of people who seem to be", "is not an acedemic one. Is there a generic question about when to", "A very recent example is the following: [Would these be adequate grounds for", "worried about some alleged misconduct which happend many years ago. A very recent", "many years ago. A very recent example is the following: [Would these be", "misconduct which happend many years ago. A very recent example is the following:", "about when to worry about alleged misconduct after many years to which these", "happend many years ago. A very recent example is the following: [Would these", "I realised that with some regularity there seem to be question of people", "the actual problem is not an acedemic one. Is there a generic question", "who seem to be obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct which happend many", "to be obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct which happend many years ago.", "following: [Would these be adequate grounds for severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413).", "be question of people who seem to be obsessively worried about some alleged", "seem to be question of people who seem to be obsessively worried about", "it looks like the actual problem is not an acedemic one. Is there", "undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions, it looks like", "one. Is there a generic question about when to worry about alleged misconduct", "problem is not an acedemic one. Is there a generic question about when", "obsessively worried about some alleged misconduct which happend many years ago. A very", "an acedemic one. Is there a generic question about when to worry about", "[An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions, it looks like the actual", "some alleged misconduct which happend many years ago. A very recent example is", "a generic question about when to worry about alleged misconduct after many years", "alleged misconduct after many years to which these could be marked as duplicates?", "reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions,", "is the following: [Would these be adequate grounds for severe reprimand from my", "most of these questions, it looks like the actual problem is not an", "ago. A very recent example is the following: [Would these be adequate grounds", "very recent example is the following: [Would these be adequate grounds for severe", "there seem to be question of people who seem to be obsessively worried", "years ago. A very recent example is the following: [Would these be adequate", "adequate grounds for severe reprimand from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In", "older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions, it looks like the actual problem", "regularity there seem to be question of people who seem to be obsessively", "that with some regularity there seem to be question of people who seem", "worry about alleged misconduct after many years to which these could be marked", "my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions, it looks", "from my undergraduate program?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/175413/would-these-be-adequate-grounds-for-expulsion-loss-of-admissions-scholarships-e#175413). [An older example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/102175/cheated-on-an-exam-when-i-was-eight-years-old-should-i-tell-graduate-admissions). In most of these questions, it", "these questions, it looks like the actual problem is not an acedemic one.", "of these questions, it looks like the actual problem is not an acedemic", "not an acedemic one. Is there a generic question about when to worry" ]
[ "best for your site! > If you can discuss this question with your", "voting is quite even between the two options. --- On Academia.SE, all other", "do so. > > > Please let us know what you think will", "be \"50/50\" since the voting is quite even between the two options. ---", "> We can change the way the engine sorts answers in site settings.", "pin it back > on a few sites that ask us to do", "me acknowledge in advance that we will not be > able to run", "> would like to hear from you all if it is something you", "of how things were. We can re-start the conversation in the future. I", "something you want to see on > your site. (Please let me acknowledge", "like there's going to be consensus here in favor of a change, so", "way the engine sorts answers in site settings. We > would like to", "site.) > > > Currently we are planning to move forward with one", "rather than the one that is accepted, [this behavior has now changed on", "for your site! > If you can discuss this question with your community", "would like to hear from you all if it is something you want", "move forward with one of two scenarios, > based on your feedback: >", "do the following: > > > (meta discussion, share with SE staff via", "about \"accepted answers\" that have become outdated, and a test that suggests users", "> If you can discuss this question with your community it would be", "OP decides is to be marked \"correct\". It is followed by all the", "forward with the status quo and not to change the default behaviour on", "the accepted answer (if there is one), the one that the OP decides", "We are going to collect feedback before the end of September > 19th.", "in order of votes by default (users can also change to sort by", "SE sites by default and unpin it on a few sites that ask", "think will work best for your site! > If you can discuss this", "would be > awesome. We are going to collect feedback before the end", "your community it would be > awesome. We are going to collect feedback", "have become outdated, and a test that suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit", "that appears first is the accepted answer (if there is one), the one", "a change, so it seems we'll stick with the default option of how", "to do so. > 2. Keep the accepted answer pinned > on all", "sense, please do the following: > > > (meta discussion, share with SE", "discussion, share with SE staff via status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem like", "> So, what do y'all think? Whichever way the default ends up going,", "that suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit from the top answer being the", "able to run a test on each site.) > > > Currently we", "the default ends up going, how would you like things to behave on", "top answer being the one with most votes rather than the one that", "Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta announcement: > > We can change the", "that some sites do not want to unpin the accepted answer, we decided", "so. > 2. Keep the accepted answer pinned > on all SE sites", "question with your community it would be > awesome. We are going to", "by default and unpin it on a few sites that ask us to", "> > So, what do y'all think? Whichever way the default ends up", "of user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that have become outdated, and a", "Active or Oldest). As a result of user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\"", "top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone for the", "the end of September > 19th. > > > So, what do y'all", "others in order of votes by default (users can also change to sort", "Seeing that some sites do not want to unpin the accepted answer, we", "changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta announcement: > > We", "StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that appears first is", "to move forward with one of two scenarios, > based on your feedback:", "We > would like to hear from you all if it is something", "SE staff via status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem like there's going to", "or Oldest). As a result of user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that", "and a test that suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit from the top", "between the two options. --- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and [until", "default (users can also change to sort by Active or Oldest). As a", "the others in order of votes by default (users can also change to", "on this change across the network, SE has decided as a default to", "It doesn't seem like there's going to be consensus here in favor of", "how things were. We can re-start the conversation in the future. I updated", "we will not be > able to run a test on each site.)", "seems we'll stick with the default option of how things were. We can", "you want to see on > your site. (Please let me acknowledge in", "share with SE staff via status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem like there's", "awesome. We are going to collect feedback before the end of September >", "that ask us to do so. > 2. Keep the accepted answer pinned", "way the default ends up going, how would you like things to behave", "\"50/50\" since the voting is quite even between the two options. --- On", "accepted answer from the top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks", "from the top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone", "Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Seeing that some sites do not want", "can also change to sort by Active or Oldest). As a result of", "few sites that ask us to do so. > 2. Keep the accepted", "change the way the engine sorts answers in site settings. We > would", "accepted answer pinned > on all SE sites by default and unpin it", "your feedback: > > > 1. Unpin the accepted answer on all SE", "want to unpin the accepted answer, we decided to move forward with the", "sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that appears first is the", "work best for your site! > If you can discuss this question with", "default and unpin it on a few sites that ask us to >", "I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since the voting is quite even", "the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Seeing", "followed by all the others in order of votes by default (users can", "sites that ask us to do so. > 2. Keep the accepted answer", "sort by Active or Oldest). As a result of user feedback, especially about", "We can re-start the conversation in the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to", "be consensus here in favor of a change, so it seems we'll stick", "site! > If you can discuss this question with your community it would", "\"correct\". It is followed by all the others in order of votes by", "a result of user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that have become outdated,", "to > do so. > > > Please let us know what you", "[until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that appears first is the accepted answer", "answer that appears first is the accepted answer (if there is one), the", "updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since the voting is quite even between", "become outdated, and a test that suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit from", "community it would be > awesome. We are going to collect feedback before", "the accepted answer on your site makes sense, please do the following: >", "ask us to do so. > 2. Keep the accepted answer pinned >", "is quite even between the two options. --- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange", "think unpinning the accepted answer on your site makes sense, please do the", "other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that appears first", "Stack Overflow benefit from the top answer being the one with most votes", "your site makes sense, please do the following: > > > (meta discussion,", "from you all if it is something you want to see on >", "default and pin it back > on a few sites that ask us", "let us know what you think will work best for your site! >", "of two scenarios, > based on your feedback: > > > 1. Unpin", "this change across the network, SE has decided as a default to keep", "you think unpinning the accepted answer on your site makes sense, please do", "sites that ask us to > do so. > > > Please let", "\"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from the top of the list of", "It is followed by all the others in order of votes by default", "benefit from the top answer being the one with most votes rather than", "answer being the one with most votes rather than the one that is", "discuss this question with your community it would be > awesome. We are", "votes by default (users can also change to sort by Active or Oldest).", "feedback: > > > 1. Unpin the accepted answer on all SE sites", "Please let us know what you think will work best for your site!", "it back > on a few sites that ask us to do so.", "you all if it is something you want to see on > your", "way\", but sites can have a discussion like this one to request the", "us know what you think will work best for your site! > If", "September > 19th. > > > So, what do y'all think? Whichever way", "> based on your feedback: > > > 1. Unpin the accepted answer", "site makes sense, please do the following: > > > (meta discussion, share", "it seems we'll stick with the default option of how things were. We", "what do y'all think? Whichever way the default ends up going, how would", "> > We can change the way the engine sorts answers in site", "answers\" that have become outdated, and a test that suggests users on Stack", "it is something you want to see on > your site. (Please let", "mixed feedback on this change across the network, SE has decided as a", "we decided to move forward with the status quo and not to change", "be marked \"correct\". It is followed by all the others in order of", "> 1. Unpin the accepted answer on all SE sites by default and", "acknowledge in advance that we will not be > able to run a", "So, what do y'all think? Whichever way the default ends up going, how", "of a change, so it seems we'll stick with the default option of", "see on > your site. (Please let me acknowledge in advance that we", "marked \"correct\". It is followed by all the others in order of votes", "is the accepted answer (if there is one), the one that the OP", "the following: > > > (meta discussion, share with SE staff via status-review,", "Oldest). As a result of user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that have", "test that suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit from the top answer being", "to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from the top of", "from that Meta announcement: > > We can change the way the engine", "pinned > on all SE sites by default and unpin it on a", "all other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that appears", "Stack Overflow, the answer that appears first is the accepted answer (if there", "here in favor of a change, so it seems we'll stick with the", "each site.) > > > Currently we are planning to move forward with", "answer pinned > on all SE sites by default and unpin it on", "a default to keep the \"old way\", but sites can have a discussion", "is accepted, [this behavior has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from", "run a test on each site.) > > > Currently we are planning", "Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since the voting is quite even between the", "decision) It doesn't seem like there's going to be consensus here in favor", "on all SE sites by default and pin it back > on a", "existing sites. If you think unpinning the accepted answer on your site makes", "> Please let us know what you think will work best for your", "this one to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from the", "> Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Seeing that some sites do not", "sites can have a discussion like this one to request the \"new way\":", "of September > 19th. > > > So, what do y'all think? Whichever", "most votes rather than the one that is accepted, [this behavior has now", "a few sites that ask us to > do so. > > >", "> 2. Keep the accepted answer pinned > on all SE sites by", "[Unpinning the accepted answer from the top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) >", "unpinning the accepted answer on your site makes sense, please do the following:", "the one with most votes rather than the one that is accepted, [this", "users on Stack Overflow benefit from the top answer being the one with", "let me acknowledge in advance that we will not be > able to", "that Meta announcement: > > We can change the way the engine sorts", "behavior has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta announcement:", "the \"old way\", but sites can have a discussion like this one to", "first is the accepted answer (if there is one), the one that the", "a few sites that ask us to do so. > 2. Keep the", "end of September > 19th. > > > So, what do y'all think?", "sites do not want to unpin the accepted answer, we decided to move", "accepted, [this behavior has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that", "as a default to keep the \"old way\", but sites can have a", "with most votes rather than the one that is accepted, [this behavior has", "result of user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that have become outdated, and", "has decided as a default to keep the \"old way\", but sites can", "\"accepted answers\" that have become outdated, and a test that suggests users on", "on a few sites that ask us to do so. > 2. Keep", "answer* (if there is one), the one that the OP decides is to", "[this behavior has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta", "the one that the OP decides is to be marked \"correct\". It is", "with the default option of how things were. We can re-start the conversation", "from the top answer being the one with most votes rather than the", "and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that appears first is the accepted", "the one that is accepted, [this behavior has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers).", "> 19th. > > > So, what do y'all think? Whichever way the", "you think will work best for your site! > If you can discuss", "one with most votes rather than the one that is accepted, [this behavior", "\"old way\", but sites can have a discussion like this one to request", "seem like there's going to be consensus here in favor of a change,", "to be marked \"correct\". It is followed by all the others in order", "on all SE sites by default and unpin it on a few sites", "scenarios, > based on your feedback: > > > 1. Unpin the accepted", "the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since the voting is", "default option of how things were. We can re-start the conversation in the", "even between the two options. --- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and", "to collect feedback before the end of September > 19th. > > >", "hear from you all if it is something you want to see on", "there is one), the one that the OP decides is to be marked", "> > 1. Unpin the accepted answer on all SE sites by default", "this question with your community it would be > awesome. We are going", "discussion like this one to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer", "two scenarios, > based on your feedback: > > > 1. Unpin the", "there's going to be consensus here in favor of a change, so it", "order of votes by default (users can also change to sort by Active", "votes rather than the one that is accepted, [this behavior has now changed", "can re-start the conversation in the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be", "accepted answer* (if there is one), the one that the OP decides is", "If you think unpinning the accepted answer on your site makes sense, please", "appears first is the accepted answer (if there is one), the one that", "not to change the default behaviour on existing sites. If you think unpinning", "have a discussion like this one to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the", "answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Seeing that some sites", "we'll stick with the default option of how things were. We can re-start", "UPDATE: Having gotten mixed feedback on this change across the network, SE has", "2. Keep the accepted answer pinned > on all SE sites by default", "following: > > > (meta discussion, share with SE staff via status-review, log", "to everyone for the feedback. Seeing that some sites do not want to", "makes sense, please do the following: > > > (meta discussion, share with", "re-start the conversation in the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\"", "if it is something you want to see on > your site. (Please", "are planning to move forward with one of two scenarios, > based on", "than the one that is accepted, [this behavior has now changed on Stack", "doesn't seem like there's going to be consensus here in favor of a", "site. (Please let me acknowledge in advance that we will not be >", "recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that appears first is the accepted answer (if", "it would be > awesome. We are going to collect feedback before the", "Overflow benefit from the top answer being the one with most votes rather", "default ends up going, how would you like things to behave on this", "so. > > > Please let us know what you think will work", "going to be consensus here in favor of a change, so it seems", "will not be > able to run a test on each site.) >", "the accepted answer pinned > on all SE sites by default and unpin", "to hear from you all if it is something you want to see", "the status quo and not to change the default behaviour on existing sites.", "> Currently we are planning to move forward with one of two scenarios,", "on each site.) > > > Currently we are planning to move forward", "know what you think will work best for your site! > If you", "by Active or Oldest). As a result of user feedback, especially about \"accepted", "is to be marked \"correct\". It is followed by all the others in", "sites by default and pin it back > on a few sites that", "staff via status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem like there's going to be", "all SE sites by default and pin it back > on a few", "one to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from the top", "> awesome. We are going to collect feedback before the end of September", "and unpin it on a few sites that ask us to > do", "please do the following: > > > (meta discussion, share with SE staff", "are going to collect feedback before the end of September > 19th. >", "being the one with most votes rather than the one that is accepted,", "be > able to run a test on each site.) > > >", "on a few sites that ask us to > do so. > >", "via status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem like there's going to be consensus", "Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta announcement: > > We can change", "few sites that ask us to > do so. > > > Please", "move forward with the status quo and not to change the default behaviour", "to move forward with the status quo and not to change the default", "the accepted answer from the top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > >", "We can change the way the engine sorts answers in site settings. We", "settings. We > would like to hear from you all if it is", "on your feedback: > > > 1. Unpin the accepted answer on all", "one that the OP decides is to be marked \"correct\". It is followed", "think? Whichever way the default ends up going, how would you like things", "feedback before the end of September > 19th. > > > So, what", "so it seems we'll stick with the default option of how things were.", "but sites can have a discussion like this one to request the \"new", "that the OP decides is to be marked \"correct\". It is followed by", "19th. > > > So, what do y'all think? Whichever way the default", "not be > able to run a test on each site.) > >", "sorts answers in site settings. We > would like to hear from you", "that we will not be > able to run a test on each", "before the end of September > 19th. > > > So, what do", "> do so. > > > Please let us know what you think", "suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit from the top answer being the one", "(meta discussion, share with SE staff via status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem", "of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Seeing that some", "announcement: > > We can change the way the engine sorts answers in", "accepted answer on your site makes sense, please do the following: > >", "> on a few sites that ask us to do so. > 2.", "If you can discuss this question with your community it would be >", "default to keep the \"old way\", but sites can have a discussion like", "user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that have become outdated, and a test", "in advance that we will not be > able to run a test", "> > Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Seeing that some sites do", "status quo and not to change the default behaviour on existing sites. If", "everyone for the feedback. Seeing that some sites do not want to unpin", "of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone for the feedback.", "will work best for your site! > If you can discuss this question", "planning to move forward with one of two scenarios, > based on your", "SE sites by default and pin it back > on a few sites", "default behaviour on existing sites. If you think unpinning the accepted answer on", "engine sorts answers in site settings. We > would like to hear from", "ask us to > do so. > > > Please let us know", "and not to change the default behaviour on existing sites. If you think", "answers in site settings. We > would like to hear from you all", "your site. (Please let me acknowledge in advance that we will not be", "forward with one of two scenarios, > based on your feedback: > >", "us to do so. > 2. Keep the accepted answer pinned > on", "all if it is something you want to see on > your site.", "quite even between the two options. --- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites,", "the conversation in the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since", "all SE sites by default and unpin it on a few sites that", "to change the default behaviour on existing sites. If you think unpinning the", "that have become outdated, and a test that suggests users on Stack Overflow", "Meta announcement: > > We can change the way the engine sorts answers", "Also quoted from that Meta announcement: > > We can change the way", "can change the way the engine sorts answers in site settings. We >", "list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Seeing that", "do not want to unpin the accepted answer, we decided to move forward", "with your community it would be > awesome. We are going to collect", "especially about \"accepted answers\" that have become outdated, and a test that suggests", "us to > do so. > > > Please let us know what", "now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta announcement: > >", "feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that have become outdated, and a test that", "the answer that appears first is the accepted answer (if there is one),", "some sites do not want to unpin the accepted answer, we decided to", "to keep the \"old way\", but sites can have a discussion like this", "answer from the top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to", "the two options. --- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow)", "collect feedback before the end of September > 19th. > > > So,", "feedback. Seeing that some sites do not want to unpin the accepted answer,", "decided to move forward with the status quo and not to change the", "status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem like there's going to be consensus here", "outdated, and a test that suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit from the", "> your site. (Please let me acknowledge in advance that we will not", "a test on each site.) > > > Currently we are planning to", "the top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers) > > Thanks to everyone for", "to be consensus here in favor of a change, so it seems we'll", "not want to unpin the accepted answer, we decided to move forward with", "to sort by Active or Oldest). As a result of user feedback, especially", "test on each site.) > > > Currently we are planning to move", "> able to run a test on each site.) > > > Currently", "on existing sites. If you think unpinning the accepted answer on your site", "decided as a default to keep the \"old way\", but sites can have", "two options. --- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack", "favor of a change, so it seems we'll stick with the default option", "do so. > 2. Keep the accepted answer pinned > on all SE", "based on your feedback: > > > 1. Unpin the accepted answer on", "y'all think? Whichever way the default ends up going, how would you like", "back > on a few sites that ask us to do so. >", "keep the \"old way\", but sites can have a discussion like this one", "(if there is one), the one that the OP decides is to be", "can have a discussion like this one to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning", "> > > So, what do y'all think? Whichever way the default ends", "1. Unpin the accepted answer on all SE sites by default and pin", "you can discuss this question with your community it would be > awesome.", "behaviour on existing sites. If you think unpinning the accepted answer on your", "consensus to be \"50/50\" since the voting is quite even between the two", "your site! > If you can discuss this question with your community it", "change to sort by Active or Oldest). As a result of user feedback,", "one that is accepted, [this behavior has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also", "the accepted answer on all SE sites by default and pin it back", "conversation in the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since the", "with the status quo and not to change the default behaviour on existing", "we are planning to move forward with one of two scenarios, > based", "is something you want to see on > your site. (Please let me", "like this one to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from", "(users can also change to sort by Active or Oldest). As a result", "request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from the top of the", "in the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since the voting", "on > your site. (Please let me acknowledge in advance that we will", "options. --- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow,", "one), the one that the OP decides is to be marked \"correct\". It", "by default (users can also change to sort by Active or Oldest). As", "across the network, SE has decided as a default to keep the \"old", "answer on your site makes sense, please do the following: > > >", "by default and pin it back > on a few sites that ask", "things were. We can re-start the conversation in the future. I updated Academia.SE's", "change the default behaviour on existing sites. If you think unpinning the accepted", "ends up going, how would you like things to behave on this site?", "consensus here in favor of a change, so it seems we'll stick with", "the accepted answer, we decided to move forward with the status quo and", "all the others in order of votes by default (users can also change", "one of two scenarios, > based on your feedback: > > > 1.", "answer on all SE sites by default and pin it back > on", "> on all SE sites by default and unpin it on a few", "As a result of user feedback, especially about \"accepted answers\" that have become", "a test that suggests users on Stack Overflow benefit from the top answer", "decides is to be marked \"correct\". It is followed by all the others", "Unpin the accepted answer on all SE sites by default and pin it", "Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer that", "Keep the accepted answer pinned > on all SE sites by default and", "what you think will work best for your site! > If you can", "by all the others in order of votes by default (users can also", "site settings. We > would like to hear from you all if it", "unpin the accepted answer, we decided to move forward with the status quo", "can discuss this question with your community it would be > awesome. We", "log decision) It doesn't seem like there's going to be consensus here in", "advance that we will not be > able to run a test on", "> > > 1. Unpin the accepted answer on all SE sites by", "to run a test on each site.) > > > Currently we are", "has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta announcement: >", "> > > (meta discussion, share with SE staff via status-review, log decision)", "Having gotten mixed feedback on this change across the network, SE has decided", "Overflow, the answer that appears first is the accepted answer (if there is", "answer, we decided to move forward with the status quo and not to", "the feedback. Seeing that some sites do not want to unpin the accepted", "quo and not to change the default behaviour on existing sites. If you", "be > awesome. We are going to collect feedback before the end of", "feedback on this change across the network, SE has decided as a default", "with one of two scenarios, > based on your feedback: > > >", "the way the engine sorts answers in site settings. We > would like", "--- On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the", "were. We can re-start the conversation in the future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus", "a discussion like this one to request the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted", "in favor of a change, so it seems we'll stick with the default", "of votes by default (users can also change to sort by Active or", "do y'all think? Whichever way the default ends up going, how would you", "want to see on > your site. (Please let me acknowledge in advance", "> > > Please let us know what you think will work best", "change across the network, SE has decided as a default to keep the", "the \"new way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from the top of the list", "quoted from that Meta announcement: > > We can change the way the", "the default behaviour on existing sites. If you think unpinning the accepted answer", "the network, SE has decided as a default to keep the \"old way\",", "stick with the default option of how things were. We can re-start the", "gotten mixed feedback on this change across the network, SE has decided as", "the default option of how things were. We can re-start the conversation in", "> > > Currently we are planning to move forward with one of", "change, so it seems we'll stick with the default option of how things", "way\": [Unpinning the accepted answer from the top of the list of answers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers)", "sites by default and unpin it on a few sites that ask us", "on your site makes sense, please do the following: > > > (meta", "accepted answer, we decided to move forward with the status quo and not", "future. I updated Academia.SE's consensus to be \"50/50\" since the voting is quite", "to be \"50/50\" since the voting is quite even between the two options.", "unpin it on a few sites that ask us to > do so.", "on Stack Overflow benefit from the top answer being the one with most", "> > (meta discussion, share with SE staff via status-review, log decision) It", "> > Currently we are planning to move forward with one of two", "accepted answer on all SE sites by default and pin it back >", "going to collect feedback before the end of September > 19th. > >", "option of how things were. We can re-start the conversation in the future.", "like to hear from you all if it is something you want to", "and pin it back > on a few sites that ask us to", "with SE staff via status-review, log decision) It doesn't seem like there's going", "network, SE has decided as a default to keep the \"old way\", but", "(Please let me acknowledge in advance that we will not be > able", "the engine sorts answers in site settings. We > would like to hear", "in site settings. We > would like to hear from you all if", "for the feedback. Seeing that some sites do not want to unpin the", "sites. If you think unpinning the accepted answer on your site makes sense,", "is one), the one that the OP decides is to be marked \"correct\".", "> (meta discussion, share with SE staff via status-review, log decision) It doesn't", "it on a few sites that ask us to > do so. >", "is followed by all the others in order of votes by default (users", "SE has decided as a default to keep the \"old way\", but sites", "since the voting is quite even between the two options. --- On Academia.SE,", "to unpin the accepted answer, we decided to move forward with the status", "the OP decides is to be marked \"correct\". It is followed by all", "On Academia.SE, all other StackExchange sites, and [until recently](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/411352/outdated-answers-accepted-answer-is-now-unpinned-on-stack-overflow) Stack Overflow, the answer", "the top answer being the one with most votes rather than the one", "Currently we are planning to move forward with one of two scenarios, >", "also change to sort by Active or Oldest). As a result of user", "on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted from that Meta announcement: > > We can", "Whichever way the default ends up going, how would you like things to", "to see on > your site. (Please let me acknowledge in advance that", "that ask us to > do so. > > > Please let us", "the voting is quite even between the two options. --- On Academia.SE, all", "that is accepted, [this behavior has now changed on Stack Overflow](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/369568/unpinning-the-accepted-answer-from-the-top-of-the-list-of-answers). Also quoted", "> > Please let us know what you think will work best for" ]
[ "and practice is also racist/classist and there is no way around this.\") &", "Is this behaviour allowed here?* I don't think it is allowed, so I", "my answer is absolutely clear about the truthfulness of these comments: I do", "it tells more about the user who made those claims, than me. *Is", "comment on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal view\". Neither", "world to accept western ideas and practice is also racist/classist and there is", "think being falsely accused of racism is serious, and it tells more about", "is better than the other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not between the lines,", "think it is allowed, so I flagged those comments for moderator attention. I", "chauvinism** (source: one of the last comment on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance", "I flagged those comments for moderator attention. I might well be wrong. I", "clear about the truthfulness of these comments: I do not criticize any race,", "comments for moderator attention. I might well be wrong. I don't mind, I", "well be wrong. I don't mind, I am able to handle criticism &", "generally support free speech, and I am ok to be ciricized. I think", "not criticize any race, or suggesting that one race is better than the", "criticism & reason for my views, but I am curious about this community's", "way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism (source: one of the last comment on", "racist/classist and there is no way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism* (source: one", "My post has absolutely nothing to do with race. I generally support free", "([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the world to accept western ideas and practice", "race, or suggesting that one race is better than the other, neither explicitly", "I might well be wrong. I don't mind, I am able to handle", "I don't think it is allowed, so I flagged those comments for moderator", "\"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who", "mind, I am able to handle criticism & reason for my views, but", "community's stance on this issue. EDIT: the first comment mentioned above got removed.", "do with race.* I generally support free speech, and I am ok to", "of the last comment on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not a", "lines, not in any other way. My post has absolutely nothing to do", "answer is absolutely clear about the truthfulness of these comments: I do not", "not between the lines, not in any other way. My post has absolutely", "those comments for moderator attention. I might well be wrong. I don't mind,", "wrong. I don't mind, I am able to handle criticism & reason for", "I am able to handle criticism & reason for my views, but I", "be wrong. I don't mind, I am able to handle criticism & reason", "ciricized. I think being falsely accused of racism is serious, and it tells", "of racism is serious, and it tells more about the user who made", "allowed here?* I don't think it is allowed, so I flagged those comments", "falsely accused of racism is serious, and it tells more about the user", "to do with race. I generally support free speech, and I am ok", "than me. Is this behaviour allowed here? I don't think it is allowed,", "behaviour allowed here? I don't think it is allowed, so I flagged those", "who made those claims, than me. Is this behaviour allowed here? I don't", "is allowed, so I flagged those comments for moderator attention. I might well", "I do not criticize any race, or suggesting that one race is better", "being falsely accused of racism is serious, and it tells more about the", "is also racist/classist and there is no way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism", "to be ciricized. I think being falsely accused of racism is serious, and", "and it tells more about the user who made those claims, than me.", "I am curious about this community's stance on this issue. EDIT: the first", "about the truthfulness of these comments: I do not criticize any race, or", "other way. My post has absolutely nothing to do with race. I generally", "don't think it is allowed, so I flagged those comments for moderator attention.", "the other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not between the lines, not in any", "view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer is absolutely clear", "to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of racism* ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in", "or suggesting that one race is better than the other, neither explicitly or", "is absolutely clear about the truthfulness of these comments: I do not criticize", "racism is serious, and it tells more about the user who made those", "suggesting that one race is better than the other, neither explicitly or implicitly,", "views, but I am curious about this community's stance on this issue. EDIT:", "one of the last comment on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not", "might well be wrong. I don't mind, I am able to handle criticism", "my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric", "criticize any race, or suggesting that one race is better than the other,", "a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer is", "I generally support free speech, and I am ok to be ciricized. I", "than the other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not between the lines, not in", "accept western ideas and practice is also racist/classist and there is no way", "these comments: I do not criticize any race, or suggesting that one race", "intolerance is not a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads", "and there is no way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism* (source: one of", "any other way. My post has absolutely nothing to do with race. I", "don't mind, I am able to handle criticism & reason for my views,", "last comment on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal view\".", "\"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer is absolutely", "or implicitly, not between the lines, not in any other way. My post", "not in any other way. My post has absolutely nothing to do with", "ok to be ciricized. I think being falsely accused of racism is serious,", "it is allowed, so I flagged those comments for moderator attention. I might", "this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism* (source: one of the last comment on my answer", "am curious about this community's stance on this issue. EDIT: the first comment", "not a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of racism ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the", "the last comment on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal", "I was accused of racism ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the world to", "now. \"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone", "support free speech, and I am ok to be ciricized. I think being", "serious, and it tells more about the user who made those claims, than", "my views, but I am curious about this community's stance on this issue.", "better than the other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not between the lines, not", "race.* I generally support free speech, and I am ok to be ciricized.", "I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/176220/103617) answer to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of racism", "question. I was accused of racism ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the world", "accused of racism is serious, and it tells more about the user who", "way. My post has absolutely nothing to do with race.* I generally support", "allowed, so I flagged those comments for moderator attention. I might well be", "answer to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of racism ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone", "to handle criticism & reason for my views, but I am curious about", "western ideas and practice is also racist/classist and there is no way around", "absolutely clear about the truthfulness of these comments: I do not criticize any", "has absolutely nothing to do with race.* I generally support free speech, and", "around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism* (source: one of the last comment on my", "ideas and practice is also racist/classist and there is no way around this.\")", "expecting everyone in the world to accept western ideas and practice is also", "for moderator attention. I might well be wrong. I don't mind, I am", "ethnocentric chauvinism* (source: one of the last comment on my answer now. \"Religious", "is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer is absolutely clear about the", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/176220/103617) answer to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of racism ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting", "about the user who made those claims, than me. Is this behaviour allowed", "for my views, but I am curious about this community's stance on this", "I think being falsely accused of racism is serious, and it tells more", "on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal view\". Neither is", "truthfulness of these comments: I do not criticize any race, or suggesting that", "one race is better than the other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not between", "and I am ok to be ciricized. I think being falsely accused of", "is no way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism* (source: one of the last", "practice is also racist/classist and there is no way around this.\") & ethnocentric", "ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer is absolutely clear about the truthfulness", "user who made those claims, than me. Is this behaviour allowed here? I", "Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer is absolutely clear about", "nothing to do with race.* I generally support free speech, and I am", "who reads my answer is absolutely clear about the truthfulness of these comments:", "am able to handle criticism & reason for my views, but I am", "able to handle criticism & reason for my views, but I am curious", "there is no way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism* (source: one of the", "& reason for my views, but I am curious about this community's stance", "answer now. \"Religious intolerance is not a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\").", "racism** ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the world to accept western ideas and", "(source: one of the last comment on my answer now. \"Religious intolerance is", "the user who made those claims, than me. Is this behaviour allowed here?", "is not a \"liberal view\". Neither is ethnocentric chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my", "more about the user who made those claims, than me. Is this behaviour", "comments: I do not criticize any race, or suggesting that one race is", "of these comments: I do not criticize any race, or suggesting that one", "race is better than the other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not between the", "to accept western ideas and practice is also racist/classist and there is no", "am ok to be ciricized. I think being falsely accused of racism is", "absolutely nothing to do with race.* I generally support free speech, and I", "claims, than me. Is this behaviour allowed here? I don't think it is", "speech, and I am ok to be ciricized. I think being falsely accused", "moderator attention. I might well be wrong. I don't mind, I am able", "that one race is better than the other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not", "in the world to accept western ideas and practice is also racist/classist and", "have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/176220/103617) answer to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of racism ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899):", "this behaviour allowed here?** I don't think it is allowed, so I flagged", "about this community's stance on this issue. EDIT: the first comment mentioned above", "was accused of racism* ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the world to accept", "between the lines, not in any other way. My post has absolutely nothing", "no way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism (source: one of the last comment", "here? I don't think it is allowed, so I flagged those comments for", "with race. I generally support free speech, and I am ok to be", "of racism** ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the world to accept western ideas", "in any other way. My post has absolutely nothing to do with race.", "be ciricized. I think being falsely accused of racism is serious, and it", "posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/176220/103617) answer to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of racism* ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And,", "Recently I have posted [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/176220/103617) answer to [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/176215/103617) question. I was accused of", "any race, or suggesting that one race is better than the other, neither", "me. Is this behaviour allowed here?* I don't think it is allowed, so", "attention. I might well be wrong. I don't mind, I am able to", "reason for my views, but I am curious about this community's stance on", "chauvinism.\"). Anyone who reads my answer is absolutely clear about the truthfulness of", "the truthfulness of these comments: I do not criticize any race, or suggesting", "tells more about the user who made those claims, than me. Is this", "but I am curious about this community's stance on this issue. EDIT: the", "flagged those comments for moderator attention. I might well be wrong. I don't", "free speech, and I am ok to be ciricized. I think being falsely", "accused of racism** ([source](https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/59286899#59286899): \"And, expecting everyone in the world to accept western", "explicitly or implicitly, not between the lines, not in any other way. My", "also racist/classist and there is no way around this.\") & ethnocentric chauvinism (source:", "other, neither explicitly or implicitly, not between the lines, not in any other", "this community's stance on this issue. EDIT: the first comment mentioned above got", "implicitly, not between the lines, not in any other way. My post has", "everyone in the world to accept western ideas and practice is also racist/classist", "handle criticism & reason for my views, but I am curious about this", "I am ok to be ciricized. I think being falsely accused of racism", "those claims, than me. Is this behaviour allowed here?* I don't think it", "& ethnocentric chauvinism (source: one of the last comment on my answer now.", "post has absolutely nothing to do with race. I generally support free speech,", "do not criticize any race, or suggesting that one race is better than", "made those claims, than me. Is this behaviour allowed here? I don't think", "I don't mind, I am able to handle criticism & reason for my", "the world to accept western ideas and practice is also racist/classist and there", "is serious, and it tells more about the user who made those claims,", "the lines, not in any other way. My post has absolutely nothing to", "so I flagged those comments for moderator attention. I might well be wrong.", "curious about this community's stance on this issue. EDIT: the first comment mentioned", "\"And, expecting everyone in the world to accept western ideas and practice is", "Anyone who reads my answer is absolutely clear about the truthfulness of these", "reads my answer is absolutely clear about the truthfulness of these comments: I", "neither explicitly or implicitly, not between the lines, not in any other way." ]
[ "no way \"academia\"... it is a small set of people who make decisions", "prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals working in all sectors, including", "Nobel Committee is in no way \"academia\"... it is a small set of", "way \"academia\"... it is a small set of people who make decisions based", "to Academia. Similarly, there are many areas of Academia for which there is", "some of which are only very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there are", "and individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel", "off-topic\" vote on this question. I felt this question was off-topic for two", "as that has nothing to do with academia, academic achievement, or the award.", "don't necessarily align with academia's idea of success. * The specific question asked", "a number of Nobel prizes, some of which are only very tenuously related", "asked about the [gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast", "question. I felt this question was off-topic for two reasons: * There are", "was off-topic for two reasons: * There are many a number of Nobel", "Prizes are awarded to individuals working in all sectors, including government, academia, industry,", "own set of criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily align with academia's idea", "related to Academia. Similarly, there are many areas of Academia for which there", "awarded to individuals working in all sectors, including government, academia, industry, and individual", "of people who make decisions based on their own set of criteria, and", "academic achievement, or the award. It's a general critique of a decision-making process", "Academia. Similarly, there are many areas of Academia for which there is no", "award. It's a general critique of a decision-making process for a specific non-academic", "or the award. It's a general critique of a decision-making process for a", "prizes, some of which are only very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there", "specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this here to start a discussion on", "the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on this question. I felt this question", "set of criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily align with academia's idea of", "as off-topic\" vote on this question. I felt this question was off-topic for", "committee. I'm posting this here to start a discussion on whether I was", "is a small set of people who make decisions based on their own", "decision-making process for a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this here to", "vote on this question. I felt this question was off-topic for two reasons:", "tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there are many areas of Academia for which", "is in no way \"academia\"... it is a small set of people who", "of criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily align with academia's idea of success.", "asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has nothing to do", "Nobel prizes, some of which are only very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly,", "for which there is no Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded to", "Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on this question.", "this question. I felt this question was off-topic for two reasons: * There", "- Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel Committee is in", "many a number of Nobel prizes, some of which are only very tenuously", "on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel Committee is in no way \"academia\"... it is a", "there is no Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals working", "that has nothing to do with academia, academic achievement, or the award. It's", "number of Nobel prizes, some of which are only very tenuously related to", "2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on", "including government, academia, industry, and individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are", "individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel Committee", "specific question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has nothing", "their own set of criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily align with academia's", "The Nobel Committee is in no way \"academia\"... it is a small set", "Similarly, there are many areas of Academia for which there is no Nobel", "are awarded to individuals working in all sectors, including government, academia, industry, and", "A question was recently asked about the [gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel", "laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on this question. I", "industry, and individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The", "Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on this", "work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel Committee is", "many areas of Academia for which there is no Nobel prize. * Nobel", "academia, industry, and individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) ", "discussion on whether I was wrong to close this question and to solicit", "with academia, academic achievement, or the award. It's a general critique of a", "question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has nothing to", "government, academia, industry, and individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)", "criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily align with academia's idea of success. ", "process for a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this here to start", "the [gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding", "Academia for which there is no Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded", "in all sectors, including government, academia, industry, and individual work. - Mea culpa...", "it is a small set of people who make decisions based on their", "question was recently asked about the [gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize", "felt this question was off-topic for two reasons: * There are many a", "above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has nothing to do with", "necessarily align with academia's idea of success. * The specific question asked above—asking", "a discussion on whether I was wrong to close this question and to", "working in all sectors, including government, academia, industry, and individual work. - Mea", "metrics don't necessarily align with academia's idea of success. The specific question", "of a decision-making process for a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this", "deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on this question. I felt this question was", "was wrong to close this question and to solicit reasons in both directions.", "off-topic for two reasons: * There are many a number of Nobel prizes,", "of success. * The specific question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic,", "The specific question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has", "areas of Academia for which there is no Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes", "clearly off-topic, as that has nothing to do with academia, academic achievement, or", "a small set of people who make decisions based on their own set", "to start a discussion on whether I was wrong to close this question", "about the [gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the", "cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on this question. I felt this", "critique of a decision-making process for a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting", "about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has nothing to do with academia,", "the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote", "very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there are many areas of Academia for", "distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close as", "are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel Committee is in no way \"academia\"... it is", "of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\"", "to individuals working in all sectors, including government, academia, industry, and individual work.", "Committee is in no way \"academia\"... it is a small set of people", "no Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals working in all", "[research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel Committee is in no way \"academia\"...", "two reasons: * There are many a number of Nobel prizes, some of", "make decisions based on their own set of criteria, and their metrics don't", "for a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this here to start a", "on their own set of criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily align with", "on this question. I felt this question was off-topic for two reasons: ", "all sectors, including government, academia, industry, and individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent", "in no way \"academia\"... it is a small set of people who make", "of which are only very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there are many", "has nothing to do with academia, academic achievement, or the award. It's a", "set of people who make decisions based on their own set of criteria,", "who make decisions based on their own set of criteria, and their metrics", "for two reasons: There are many a number of Nobel prizes, some", "which there is no Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals", "was recently asked about the [gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021).", "align with academia's idea of success. * The specific question asked above—asking about", "do with academia, academic achievement, or the award. It's a general critique of", "Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel Committee is in no", "a general critique of a decision-making process for a specific non-academic award-granting committee.", "a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this here to start a discussion", "this here to start a discussion on whether I was wrong to close", "to do with academia, academic achievement, or the award. It's a general critique", "of Academia for which there is no Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes are", "academia, academic achievement, or the award. It's a general critique of a decision-making", "sectors, including government, academia, industry, and individual work. - Mea culpa... [research-adjacent fields", "distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has nothing to do with academia, academic achievement,", "decisions based on their own set of criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily", "small set of people who make decisions based on their own set of", "I felt this question was off-topic for two reasons: * There are many", "fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) * The Nobel Committee is in no way \"academia\"... it", "posting this here to start a discussion on whether I was wrong to", "* There are many a number of Nobel prizes, some of which are", "I'm posting this here to start a discussion on whether I was wrong", "Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals working in all sectors,", "There are many a number of Nobel prizes, some of which are only", "here to start a discussion on whether I was wrong to close this", "achievement, or the award. It's a general critique of a decision-making process for", "Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals working in all sectors, including government, academia,", "reasons: * There are many a number of Nobel prizes, some of which", "I was wrong to close this question and to solicit reasons in both", "based on their own set of criteria, and their metrics don't necessarily align", "only very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there are many areas of Academia", "this question was off-topic for two reasons: * There are many a number", "non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this here to start a discussion on whether", "* The specific question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that", "on whether I was wrong to close this question and to solicit reasons", "nothing to do with academia, academic achievement, or the award. It's a general", "* Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals working in all sectors, including government,", "question was off-topic for two reasons: * There are many a number of", "a decision-making process for a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm posting this here", "their metrics don't necessarily align with academia's idea of success. * The specific", "off-topic, as that has nothing to do with academia, academic achievement, or the", "are many areas of Academia for which there is no Nobel prize. ", "\"academia\"... it is a small set of people who make decisions based on", "with academia's idea of success. The specific question asked above—asking about gender", "award-granting committee. I'm posting this here to start a discussion on whether I", "* The Nobel Committee is in no way \"academia\"... it is a small", "general critique of a decision-making process for a specific non-academic award-granting committee. I'm", "whether I was wrong to close this question and to solicit reasons in", "idea of success. * The specific question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly", "there are many areas of Academia for which there is no Nobel prize.", "is no Nobel prize. * Nobel Prizes are awarded to individuals working in", "and their metrics don't necessarily align with academia's idea of success. * The", "gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as that has nothing to do with academia, academic", "are many a number of Nobel prizes, some of which are only very", "academia's idea of success. * The specific question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is", "of Nobel prizes, some of which are only very tenuously related to Academia.", "success. * The specific question asked above—asking about gender distributions—is clearly off-topic, as", "individuals working in all sectors, including government, academia, industry, and individual work. -", "[gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I cast the deciding \"close", "It's a general critique of a decision-making process for a specific non-academic award-granting", "start a discussion on whether I was wrong to close this question and", "culpa... [research-adjacent fields are on-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic) The Nobel Committee is in no way", "recently asked about the [gender distribution of the 2021 Nobel Prize laureates](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176577/has-the-nobel-foundation-said-anything-about-the-skewed-gender-ratio-in-the-2021). I", "I cast the deciding \"close as off-topic\" vote on this question. I felt", "the award. It's a general critique of a decision-making process for a specific", "are only very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there are many areas of", "people who make decisions based on their own set of criteria, and their", "\"close as off-topic\" vote on this question. I felt this question was off-topic", "which are only very tenuously related to Academia. Similarly, there are many areas" ]
[ "a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years ago. So, two", "anyone has suggestions for this canonical question (or thinks that it shouldn't exist", "good \"duplicate target\" for questions that would otherwise be completely rejected as a", "those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in other parts", "being a good \"duplicate target\" for questions that would otherwise be completely rejected", "particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908)", "target\" for questions that would otherwise be completely rejected as a \"bad\" question,", "or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other", "people should feel free to edit); if you are familiar with the grad", "countries other than the US. In addition to being a good \"duplicate target\"", "In some sense, this is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from", "this canonical question (or thinks that it shouldn't exist at all), let's have", "process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline", "[not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in other parts of the world.", "Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the US.", "rejected as a \"bad\" question, this is also a useful reference for all", "work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237)", "questions that would otherwise be completely rejected as a \"bad\" question, this is", "other than the US. In addition to being a good \"duplicate target\" for", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the US. In addition to being a good", "this is also a useful reference for all those who might [not be", "[a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the US. In addition to", "be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in other parts of the world. In", "our most useful canonical question is: [How does the admissions process work for", "this is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years ago.", "have that discussion here. 2. Right now we only have an answer for", "question from three years ago. So, two asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions", "the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak", "discussion here. 2. Right now we only have an answer for the US", "asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions for this canonical question (or thinks that", "[this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years ago. So, two asks: 1. If anyone", "familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in other parts of the world. In some", "to edit); if you are familiar with the grad school system in other", "grad school systems in other parts of the world. In some sense, this", "that it shouldn't exist at all), let's have that discussion here. 2. Right", "from three years ago. So, two asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions for", "for the US (which people should feel free to edit); if you are", "for questions that would otherwise be completely rejected as a \"bad\" question, this", "feel free to edit); if you are familiar with the grad school system", "consider drafting an answer. Even a short answer will do; others can expand", "free to edit); if you are familiar with the grad school system in", "1. If anyone has suggestions for this canonical question (or thinks that it", "US. In addition to being a good \"duplicate target\" for questions that would", "Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy", "that discussion here. 2. Right now we only have an answer for the", "edit); if you are familiar with the grad school system in other parts", "all), let's have that discussion here. 2. Right now we only have an", "it shouldn't exist at all), let's have that discussion here. 2. Right now", "exist at all), let's have that discussion here. 2. Right now we only", "the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new", "might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in other parts of the", "an answer. Even a short answer will do; others can expand or revise", "the US. In addition to being a good \"duplicate target\" for questions that", "to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years ago. So, two asks: 1. If", "drafting an answer. Even a short answer will do; others can expand or", "a \"bad\" question, this is also a useful reference for all those who", "systems in other parts of the world. In some sense, this is a", "let's have that discussion here. 2. Right now we only have an answer", "is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years ago. So,", "the world. In some sense, this is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta", "parts of the world. In some sense, this is a follow up to", "far our most useful canonical question is: [How does the admissions process work", "of the world. In some sense, this is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries)", "three years ago. So, two asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions for this", "familiar with the grad school system in other parts of the world, please", "also a useful reference for all those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with", "Even a short answer will do; others can expand or revise it later.", "Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the US. In", "than the US. In addition to being a good \"duplicate target\" for questions", "some sense, this is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three", "US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical", "sense, this is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years", "have an answer for the US (which people should feel free to edit);", "other parts of the world, please consider drafting an answer. Even a short", "years ago. So, two asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions for this canonical", "would otherwise be completely rejected as a \"bad\" question, this is also a", "question is: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the", "we only have an answer for the US (which people should feel free", "follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years ago. So, two asks:", "weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries", "that would otherwise be completely rejected as a \"bad\" question, this is also", "completely rejected as a \"bad\" question, this is also a useful reference for", "answer. Even a short answer will do; others can expand or revise it", "two asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions for this canonical question (or thinks", "useful canonical question is: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs", "programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted", "thinks that it shouldn't exist at all), let's have that discussion here. 2.", "reference for all those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems", "of the world, please consider drafting an answer. Even a short answer will", "US (which people should feel free to edit); if you are familiar with", "new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the US. In addition to being", "question (or thinks that it shouldn't exist at all), let's have that discussion", "here. 2. Right now we only have an answer for the US (which", "in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a", "(which people should feel free to edit); if you are familiar with the", "in other parts of the world. In some sense, this is a follow", "for this canonical question (or thinks that it shouldn't exist at all), let's", "up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question from three years ago. So, two asks: 1.", "now we only have an answer for the US (which people should feel", "grad school system in other parts of the world, please consider drafting an", "(or thinks that it shouldn't exist at all), let's have that discussion here.", "with the grad school system in other parts of the world, please consider", "school system in other parts of the world, please consider drafting an answer.", "only have an answer for the US (which people should feel free to", "answer for the US (which people should feel free to edit); if you", "borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than", "useful reference for all those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school", "world, please consider drafting an answer. Even a short answer will do; others", "all those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in other", "for all those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in", "the grad school system in other parts of the world, please consider drafting", "canonical question (or thinks that it shouldn't exist at all), let's have that", "is: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US,", "has suggestions for this canonical question (or thinks that it shouldn't exist at", "otherwise be completely rejected as a \"bad\" question, this is also a useful", "So, two asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions for this canonical question (or", "shouldn't exist at all), let's have that discussion here. 2. Right now we", "the US (which people should feel free to edit); if you are familiar", "with grad school systems in other parts of the world. In some sense,", "should feel free to edit); if you are familiar with the grad school", "please consider drafting an answer. Even a short answer will do; others can", "2. Right now we only have an answer for the US (which people", "a good \"duplicate target\" for questions that would otherwise be completely rejected as", "canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the US. In addition to being a", "suggestions for this canonical question (or thinks that it shouldn't exist at all),", "to being a good \"duplicate target\" for questions that would otherwise be completely", "at all), let's have that discussion here. 2. Right now we only have", "is also a useful reference for all those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie)", "for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for", "for countries other than the US. In addition to being a good \"duplicate", "\"bad\" question, this is also a useful reference for all those who might", "\"duplicate target\" for questions that would otherwise be completely rejected as a \"bad\"", "system in other parts of the world, please consider drafting an answer. Even", "in other parts of the world, please consider drafting an answer. Even a", "does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for", "a useful reference for all those who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad", "you are familiar with the grad school system in other parts of the", "school systems in other parts of the world. In some sense, this is", "parts of the world, please consider drafting an answer. Even a short answer", "other parts of the world. In some sense, this is a follow up", "addition to being a good \"duplicate target\" for questions that would otherwise be", "drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the US. In addition", "be completely rejected as a \"bad\" question, this is also a useful reference", "most useful canonical question is: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D.", "are familiar with the grad school system in other parts of the world,", "If anyone has suggestions for this canonical question (or thinks that it shouldn't", "Right now we only have an answer for the US (which people should", "if you are familiar with the grad school system in other parts of", "[How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly", "canonical question is: [How does the admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in", "who might [not be familiar](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie) with grad school systems in other parts of", "world. In some sense, this is a follow up to [this](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4204/questions-about-admissions-procedure-in-different-countries) meta question", "as a \"bad\" question, this is also a useful reference for all those", "By far our most useful canonical question is: [How does the admissions process", "the world, please consider drafting an answer. Even a short answer will do;", "an answer for the US (which people should feel free to edit); if", "In addition to being a good \"duplicate target\" for questions that would otherwise", "ago. So, two asks: 1. If anyone has suggestions for this canonical question", "meta question from three years ago. So, two asks: 1. If anyone has", "for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or borderline students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently,", "admissions process work for Ph.D. programs in the US, particularly for weak or", "students?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/38237) Recently, Buffy drafted [a new canonical question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/176908/how-does-the-admissions-process-work-for-ph-d-programs-in-country-x#176908) for countries other than the", "question, this is also a useful reference for all those who might [not" ]
[ "\"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested", "tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\")", "these are very straightforward, but please let me know if any of them", "\| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\")", "clear difference in the usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged", "\| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \|", "\| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\")", "post. I believe most of these are very straightforward, but please let me", "\| --- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \|", "very straightforward, but please let me know if any of them requires a", "\| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show", "\| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show", "questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym", "Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter", "and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\")", "I also had a few more suggestions to clean up some redundant tags,", "the queue is not monitored. I also had a few more suggestions to", "questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\")", "Twitter is another social media site, and probably does not need its own", "[status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \|", "probably does not need its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged", "out of 44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and", "tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions", "Comments \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \|", "--- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged", "questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym", "\"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged", "retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged", "\| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show", "questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to", "questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be", "tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly", "a post. I believe most of these are very straightforward, but please let", "are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be", "up some redundant tags, so I decided to make a post. I believe", "'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged", "questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social media site, and probably does", "\| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social media site,", "--- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social media site, and probably does not", "questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show", "explicitly mentions Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \|", "know if any of them requires a separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested", "'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged", "'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct", "[bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \|", "questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show", "of them requires a separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments", "a few more suggestions to clean up some redundant tags, so I decided", "'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions", "own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show", "please let me know if any of them requires a separate discussion. \|", "The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as", "--- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show", "tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions", "seems to be no clear difference in the usage of the two. \|", "difference in the usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\")", "\"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show", "an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions", "discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \| ---", "'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review", "--- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show", "questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator", "\"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can alternatively be retagged. \|", "'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged", "[status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \|", "was likely created due to a typo a few months ago, but it", "questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions", "tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged", "\| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \|", "site, and probably does not need its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show", "of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged", "more suggestions to clean up some redundant tags, so I decided to make", "[status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \|", "likely created due to a typo a few months ago, but it seems", "for a tag that was likely created due to a typo a few", "tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5055/68109). \| Unchanged,", "\"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \|", "[withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See", "'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged", "questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show", "'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments", "already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully", "synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions", "[publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \|", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\")", "\| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag", "\"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions", "\"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse", "\"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should", "and there seems to be no clear difference in the usage of the", "two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers: \|", "had [suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) a tag synonym for a tag that was likely created due", "[bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions", "\"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is", "so I decided to make a post. I believe most of these are", "tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show", "and probably does not need its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions", "'bully'\") is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109).", "are very straightforward, but please let me know if any of them requires", "example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged", "tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged", "\| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\")", "Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \|", "questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review", "\| Comments \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| ---", "believe most of these are very straightforward, but please let me know if", "usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions", "[errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show", "tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged", "be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\")", "tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym of", "'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions", "most of these are very straightforward, but please let me know if any", "questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info", "--- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions", "\| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\")", "info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an example.", "'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social media site, and probably does not need", "questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed", "Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \|", "tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \|", "\| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show", "'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be no clear difference in the usage of", "tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info for", "\| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \|", "Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \| --- \| ---", "not need its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \|", "one question, can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \|", "from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \|", "[mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\")", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions", "tag that was likely created due to a typo a few months ago,", "\"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media", "\"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by", "there seems to be no clear difference in the usage of the two.", "\| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\")", "[peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44", "\| --- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting", "\"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and", "See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged", "\| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions", "tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated.", "\| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion", "questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show", "Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions", "[personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already", "\| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\")", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process", "ago, but it seems that the queue is not monitored. I also had", "'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media", "[review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\")", "'social-media'\") \| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions", "is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \|", "44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems", "[peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109).", "Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| ---", "\| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\")", "it seems that the queue is not monitored. I also had a few", "tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be no clear difference in the usage", "[social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social media site, and", "tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged", "\| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is", "I decided to make a post. I believe most of these are very", "few months ago, but it seems that the queue is not monitored. I", "redundant tags, so I decided to make a post. I believe most of", "questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another", "also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be no", "of these are very straightforward, but please let me know if any of", "discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \|", "\"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \|", "can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook", "\| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \|", "\| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\")", "\| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \|", "tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show", "\| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes", "\"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social media site, and probably", "'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social media", "\| Only one question, can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged", "but it seems that the queue is not monitored. I also had a", "\| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \|", "disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged", "--- \| --- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \|", "questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions", "\"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \|", "is another social media site, and probably does not need its own separate", "[twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter", "straightforward, but please let me know if any of them requires a separate", "\| --- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications", "'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can alternatively", "[status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \|", "\| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of", "need its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \|", "tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| Twitter is another social", "\"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged", "[suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) a tag synonym for a tag that was likely created due to", "question, can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \|", "monitored. I also had a few more suggestions to clean up some redundant", "questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio).", "the usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| ---", "suggestions to clean up some redundant tags, so I decided to make a", "not monitored. I also had a few more suggestions to clean up some", "another social media site, and probably does not need its own separate tag.", "[quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5055/68109). \| Unchanged, for now \|", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions", "\| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show", "created due to a typo a few months ago, but it seems that", "tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions are also", "I believe most of these are very straightforward, but please let me know", "if any of them requires a separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym", "[bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully", "should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged", "\| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged", "months ago, but it seems that the queue is not monitored. I also", "questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying", "\"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \|", "separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions", "a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show", "alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show", "tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions", "with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\")", "questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review", "\| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\")", "separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \|", "be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions", "'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions", "media site, and probably does not need its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review", "\| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \| --- \|", "me know if any of them requires a separate discussion. \| Tag \|", "[social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed", "[social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions", "a separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \|", "questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions", "a tag that was likely created due to a typo a few months", "tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions", "'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions", "[status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \|", "I had [suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) a tag synonym for a tag that was likely created", "tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can", "'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged", "\| Twitter is another social media site, and probably does not need its", "typo a few months ago, but it seems that the queue is not", "combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged", "'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions", "'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\")", "tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29", "that was likely created due to a typo a few months ago, but", "--- Suggestions from answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision", "[collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can alternatively be retagged.", "social media site, and probably does not need its own separate tag. \|", "make a post. I believe most of these are very straightforward, but please", "\"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109).", "\| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \|", "[Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged", "to be no clear difference in the usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed", "also had a few more suggestions to clean up some redundant tags, so", "\"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The tag", "\| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\")", "[review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested)", "--- \| --- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \|", "[collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only", "tag synonym for a tag that was likely created due to a typo", "\"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed", "tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show", "'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged", "questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\").", "[bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with", "to clean up some redundant tags, so I decided to make a post.", "questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions are", "'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged", "'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out", "\"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum", "due to a typo a few months ago, but it seems that the", "questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question,", "tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an", "[publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions tagged 'publications'\") \| \|", "[mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See", "'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions", "[facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \| The", "questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined with [abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show", "in the usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \|", "\"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration", "decided to make a post. I believe most of these are very straightforward,", "Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw", "Only one question, can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\")", "\| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\")", "answers: \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \| ---", "mentions Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \|", "tags, so I decided to make a post. I believe most of these", "questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show", "'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions are also tagged", "be no clear difference in the usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show", "\| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show", "synonym for a tag that was likely created due to a typo a", "tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be no clear", "\| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \|", "[peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be no clear difference", "29 out of 44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"),", "the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from answers:", "a tag synonym for a tag that was likely created due to a", "tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show", "tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged", "few more suggestions to clean up some redundant tags, so I decided to", "questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5055/68109). \|", "\| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\")", "Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions", "requires a separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision", "'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5055/68109). \| Unchanged, for", "\| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\")", "tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions", "of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| --- Suggestions from", "Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication", "does not need its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\")", "\"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show", "to a typo a few months ago, but it seems that the queue", "a few months ago, but it seems that the queue is not monitored.", "some redundant tags, so I decided to make a post. I believe most", "questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be no clear difference in the", "\"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\")", "[Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show", "\| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \|", "\| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review", "\| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show", "as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show", "Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions", "\| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") combined", "\| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") \|", "Some discussion [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5049/68109). \| Questions tagged [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \|", "seems that the queue is not monitored. I also had a few more", "'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively, should be disambiguated. Some", "queue is not monitored. I also had a few more suggestions to clean", "[here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\")", "questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show", "[review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged 'review'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| Alternatively,", "questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged", "\| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5055/68109). \| Unchanged, for now", "\| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \|", "[personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\")", "tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions", "tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show", "--- \| \| [withdraw](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/withdraw \"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged", "that the queue is not monitored. I also had a few more suggestions", "them requires a separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \|", "\| Suggested Synonym \| Comments \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \|", "\| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\")", "'status-completed'\") \| \| [twitter](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/twitter \"show questions tagged 'twitter'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged", "retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \| [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged", "\"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged 'facebook'\") \| [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media", "\| --- \| \| [publication](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publication \"show questions tagged 'publication'\") \| [publications](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/publications \"show questions", "questions tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \|", "tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \| [review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review \"show questions tagged", "See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions tagged [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes \"show questions tagged 'mistakes'\") retagged \| \|", "\| [collaboration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaboration \"show questions tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can alternatively be", "to make a post. I believe most of these are very straightforward, but", "\| The tag info for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook", "\"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there seems to be no clear difference in", "no clear difference in the usage of the two. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions", "of 44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\"), and there", "\"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\") \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") is already a", "retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [facebook](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/facebook \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'mistakes'\") \| [errors-erratum](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/errors-erratum \"show questions tagged 'errors-erratum'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5048/68109). \| Questions", "let me know if any of them requires a separate discussion. \| Tag", "\"show questions tagged 'peer-review'\") \| [Suggested](https://academia.stackexchange.com/tags/synonyms?tab=Newest&filter=Suggested) by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions", "a typo a few months ago, but it seems that the queue is", "\"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct", "'status-completed'\") \| \| [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying \"show questions tagged 'bullying'\") \| [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'bully'\") is already a synonym of [personal-misconduct](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/personal-misconduct \"show questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See", "[abuse](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/abuse \"show questions tagged 'abuse'\") \| \| [collaborator](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/collaborator \"show questions tagged 'collaborator'\") \|", "\"show questions tagged 'review'\") retagged \| \| [review-process](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/review-process \"show questions tagged 'review-process'\") \|", "tagged 'collaboration'\") \| Only one question, can alternatively be retagged. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show", "questions tagged 'personal-misconduct'\"). See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5050/68109). \| [bully](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bully \"show questions tagged 'bully'\") and [bullying](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bullying", "'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an example. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\")", "is not monitored. I also had a few more suggestions to clean up", "by [Tripartio](https://academia.stackexchange.com/users/20418/tripartio). 29 out of 44 questions are also tagged [peer-review](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/peer-review \"show questions", "any of them requires a separate discussion. \| Tag \| Suggested Synonym \|", "clean up some redundant tags, so I decided to make a post. I", "for [social-media](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/social-media \"show questions tagged 'social-media'\") explicitly mentions Facebook as an example. \|", "had a few more suggestions to clean up some redundant tags, so I", "but please let me know if any of them requires a separate discussion.", "its own separate tag. \| [status-completed](/questions/tagged/status-completed \"show questions tagged 'status-completed'\") \| \| [mistakes](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mistakes", "\"show questions tagged 'withdraw'\") \| [quitting](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/quitting \"show questions tagged 'quitting'\") \| See [here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/a/5055/68109)." ]
[ "students be on or off topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc stage having", "on the effects of ADHD on academics and students be on or off", "example: [Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added a", "topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has", "whether to expand the wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged", "postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added a new tag. I'm", "And the OP has added a new tag. I'm of mixed feelings about", "be on or off topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368).", "For example: [Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added", "questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a medical issue, but a lot", "has added a new tag. I'm of mixed feelings about whether to expand", "tag. I'm of mixed feelings about whether to expand the wiki or delete", "questions that focus on the effects of ADHD on academics and students be", "effects of ADHD on academics and students be on or off topic? For", "[adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a medical issue, but", "of ADHD on academics and students be on or off topic? For example:", "ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added a new tag. I'm of mixed feelings", "Advice? Technically it is a medical issue, but a lot of folks in", "a medical issue, but a lot of folks in academia are affected by", "medical issue, but a lot of folks in academia are affected by it.", "the effects of ADHD on academics and students be on or off topic?", "the OP has added a new tag. I'm of mixed feelings about whether", "tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a medical issue,", "delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a", "added a new tag. I'm of mixed feelings about whether to expand the", "a new tag. I'm of mixed feelings about whether to expand the wiki", "stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added a new tag. I'm of", "or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is", "on academics and students be on or off topic? For example: [Survive the", "I'm of mixed feelings about whether to expand the wiki or delete the", "wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it", "academics and students be on or off topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc", "off topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP", "having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added a new tag. I'm of mixed", "about whether to expand the wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions", "feelings about whether to expand the wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show", "tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a medical issue, but a lot of", "ADHD on academics and students be on or off topic? For example: [Survive", "expand the wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice?", "[Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added a new", "of mixed feelings about whether to expand the wiki or delete the tag", "focus on the effects of ADHD on academics and students be on or", "'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a medical issue, but a lot of folks", "to expand the wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\").", "is a medical issue, but a lot of folks in academia are affected", "and students be on or off topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc stage", "\"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a medical issue, but a", "that focus on the effects of ADHD on academics and students be on", "new tag. I'm of mixed feelings about whether to expand the wiki or", "Should questions that focus on the effects of ADHD on academics and students", "or off topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the", "mixed feelings about whether to expand the wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd", "on or off topic? For example: [Survive the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And", "the wiki or delete the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically", "OP has added a new tag. I'm of mixed feelings about whether to", "the tag [adhd](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/adhd \"show questions tagged 'adhd'\"). Advice? Technically it is a medical", "it is a medical issue, but a lot of folks in academia are", "the postdoc stage having ADHD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/177484/75368). And the OP has added a new tag.", "Technically it is a medical issue, but a lot of folks in academia" ]
[ "them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from this question). Do we", "the tag [guaranteed-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/guaranteed-admissions \"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions (three", "doesn't make sense in any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag", "one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from this question). Do we really need this", "which are closed), and apparently, it doesn't make sense in any of them", "of which are closed), and apparently, it doesn't make sense in any of", "[this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from this question). Do we really need", "[guaranteed-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/guaranteed-admissions \"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions (three of which", "'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions (three of which are closed), and apparently,", "sense in any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from", "questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions (three of which are closed),", "across the tag [guaranteed-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/guaranteed-admissions \"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions", "any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from this question).", "and apparently, it doesn't make sense in any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878)", "(three of which are closed), and apparently, it doesn't make sense in any", "make sense in any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated", "tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions (three of which are closed), and", "except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from this question). Do we really", "in any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from this", "I came across the tag [guaranteed-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/guaranteed-admissions \"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has", "came across the tag [guaranteed-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/guaranteed-admissions \"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen", "tag [guaranteed-admissions](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/guaranteed-admissions \"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions (three of", "it doesn't make sense in any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the", "it has fourteen questions (three of which are closed), and apparently, it doesn't", "of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably the tag originated from this question). Do", "are closed), and apparently, it doesn't make sense in any of them except", "has fourteen questions (three of which are closed), and apparently, it doesn't make", "Currently, it has fourteen questions (three of which are closed), and apparently, it", "(probably the tag originated from this question). Do we really need this tag?", "questions (three of which are closed), and apparently, it doesn't make sense in", "apparently, it doesn't make sense in any of them except [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/115225/77878) (probably", "fourteen questions (three of which are closed), and apparently, it doesn't make sense", "\"show questions tagged 'guaranteed-admissions'\"). Currently, it has fourteen questions (three of which are", "closed), and apparently, it doesn't make sense in any of them except [this" ]
[ "'20 at 1:05\" at the top of the column. Can this be fixed?", "top of the column. Can this be fixed? (note, this also occurrs elsewhere:", "misspelling, visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side, you should see", "also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured when uploading the image\". occured", "13 '20 at 1:05\" at the top of the column. Can this be", "e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at the top of the column.", "at 1:05\" at the top of the column. Can this be fixed?* (note,", "should see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at the", "the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at the top of", "Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at the top of the column. Can this", "fixed? (note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured when uploading", "visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side, you should see the", "the misspelling, visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side, you should", "link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side, you should see the word, e.g.", "column. Can this be fixed? (note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side, you should see the word, e.g. \"occured", "the right hand side, you should see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13", "Can this be fixed? (note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error", "at the top of the column. Can this be fixed? (note, this also", "side, you should see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\"", "1:05\" at the top of the column. Can this be fixed? (note, this", "elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured when uploading the image\". occured -> occurred](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/364538/typo-in-an-error-occured-when-uploading-the-image-occured-occurred))", "word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at the top of the", "the column. Can this be fixed? (note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in", "of the column. Can this be fixed? (note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo", "be fixed?* (note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured when", "this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side, you should see the word,", "hand side, you should see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at", "you should see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at", "examples of the misspelling, visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side,", "(note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured when uploading the", "this be fixed?* (note, this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured", "see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at the top", "this also occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured when uploading the image\".", "right hand side, you should see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec 13 '20", "see examples of the misspelling, visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand", "the top of the column. Can this be fixed? (note, this also occurrs", "To see examples of the misspelling, visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right", "occurrs elsewhere: [Typo in \"An error occured when uploading the image\". occured ->", "\"occured Dec 13 '20 at 1:05\" at the top of the column. *Can", "of the misspelling, visit this link: <https://academia.stackexchange.com/posts/55665/revisions> On the right hand side, you", "On the right hand side, you should see the word, e.g. \"occured Dec" ]
[ "and could be applied (as it is) to about half the questions here.", "doesn't seem to have any consistency at all and could be applied (as", "could be applied (as it is) to about half the questions here. It", "any consistency at all and could be applied (as it is) to about", "better description for a start, but is there anything else the community can", "but is there anything else the community can do to regularize the usage?", "This is a bag-o-worms I know. The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\")", "inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have any consistency at all and could be", "applied to nearly 500 questions, but the usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't", "It needs a better description for a start, but is there anything else", "usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have any consistency at all", "has been applied to nearly 500 questions, but the usage is extremely inconsistent.", "seem to have any consistency at all and could be applied (as it", "(as it is) to about half the questions here. It needs a better", "needs a better description for a start, but is there anything else the", "is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have any consistency at all and", "a start, but is there anything else the community can do to regularize", "questions, but the usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have any", "anything else the community can do to regularize the usage? And, given the", "bag-o-worms I know. The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied", "\"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied to nearly 500 questions, but the", "else the community can do to regularize the usage? And, given the state", "tagged 'students'\") has been applied to nearly 500 questions, but the usage is", "been applied to nearly 500 questions, but the usage is extremely inconsistent. It", "extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have any consistency at all and could", "there anything else the community can do to regularize the usage? And, given", "to have any consistency at all and could be applied (as it is)", "start, but is there anything else the community can do to regularize the", "questions here. It needs a better description for a start, but is there", "but the usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have any consistency", "half the questions here. It needs a better description for a start, but", "the questions here. It needs a better description for a start, but is", "be applied (as it is) to about half the questions here. It needs", "nearly 500 questions, but the usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to", "'students'\") has been applied to nearly 500 questions, but the usage is extremely", "description for a start, but is there anything else the community can do", "about half the questions here. It needs a better description for a start,", "can do to regularize the usage? And, given the state of it, what", "here. It needs a better description for a start, but is there anything", "community can do to regularize the usage? And, given the state of it,", "a bag-o-worms I know. The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been", "tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied to nearly 500 questions,", "all and could be applied (as it is) to about half the questions", "the usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have any consistency at", "It doesn't seem to have any consistency at all and could be applied", "the community can do to regularize the usage? And, given the state of", "consistency at all and could be applied (as it is) to about half", "know. The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied to nearly", "The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied to nearly 500", "do to regularize the usage? And, given the state of it, what should", "it is) to about half the questions here. It needs a better description", "applied (as it is) to about half the questions here. It needs a", "a better description for a start, but is there anything else the community", "is a bag-o-worms I know. The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has", "[students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied to nearly 500 questions, but", "to nearly 500 questions, but the usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem", "500 questions, but the usage is extremely inconsistent. It doesn't seem to have", "questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied to nearly 500 questions, but the usage", "to about half the questions here. It needs a better description for a", "is) to about half the questions here. It needs a better description for", "to regularize the usage? And, given the state of it, what should the", "regularize the usage? And, given the state of it, what should the description", "at all and could be applied (as it is) to about half the", "is there anything else the community can do to regularize the usage? And,", "I know. The tag [students](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/students \"show questions tagged 'students'\") has been applied to", "for a start, but is there anything else the community can do to", "the usage? And, given the state of it, what should the description say?", "have any consistency at all and could be applied (as it is) to" ]
[ "been closed - I was almost tempted to vote \"close\" more than a", "a year later when I stumbled upon the question today, but thought maybe", "It asks for a list/examples of people fitting a certain criterion. This is", "the scope of the site, and if not, why has it not been", "question fits the scope of the site, and if not, why has it", "and a ton of answers. Why? Because people perceive it as a \"fun\"", "a ton of answers. Why? Because people perceive it as a \"fun\" question,", "Why? Because people perceive it as a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to", "has not been closed - I was almost tempted to vote \"close\" more", "has [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/151174/what-are-some-examples-of-famous-scholars-with-low-h-index) not been closed as a shopping question? It asks for a", "this question has not been closed - I was almost tempted to vote", "it got 59 upvotes and a ton of answers. Why? Because people perceive", "shopping question? It asks for a list/examples of people fitting a certain criterion.", "as a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly unfair", "to vote \"close\" more than a year later when I stumbled upon the", "that this question fits the scope of the site, and if not, why", "- Do you agree that this question fits the scope of the site,", "as a shopping question? It asks for a list/examples of people fitting a", "\"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly unfair that this question has not been", "that I fail to see. So - Do you agree that this question", "question today, but thought maybe there was some reason why the question is", "59 upvotes and a ton of answers. Why? Because people perceive it as", "a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly unfair that", "of people fitting a certain criterion. This is so very obvious a shopping", "when I stumbled upon the question today, but thought maybe there was some", "today, but thought maybe there was some reason why the question is still", "fail to see. So - Do you agree that this question fits the", "to answer? It seems slightly unfair that this question has not been closed", "more than a year later when I stumbled upon the question today, but", "stumbled upon the question today, but thought maybe there was some reason why", "more \"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly unfair that this question has not", "the question is still open, a reason that I fail to see. So", "slightly unfair that this question has not been closed - I was almost", "of closing it, it got 59 upvotes and a ton of answers. Why?", "but thought maybe there was some reason why the question is still open,", "- I was almost tempted to vote \"close\" more than a year later", "So - Do you agree that this question fits the scope of the", "Because people perceive it as a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to answer?", "some reason why the question is still open, a reason that I fail", "year later when I stumbled upon the question today, but thought maybe there", "later when I stumbled upon the question today, but thought maybe there was", "so very obvious a shopping question to me, yet, instead of closing it,", "than a year later when I stumbled upon the question today, but thought", "closed as a shopping question? It asks for a list/examples of people fitting", "shopping question to me, yet, instead of closing it, it got 59 upvotes", "certain criterion. This is so very obvious a shopping question to me, yet,", "people perceive it as a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to answer? It", "answers. Why? Because people perceive it as a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\"", "even more \"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly unfair that this question has", "question, even more \"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly unfair that this question", "reason that I fail to see. So - Do you agree that this", "open, a reason that I fail to see. So - Do you agree", "a certain criterion. This is so very obvious a shopping question to me,", "It seems slightly unfair that this question has not been closed - I", "seems slightly unfair that this question has not been closed - I was", "to me, yet, instead of closing it, it got 59 upvotes and a", "was some reason why the question is still open, a reason that I", "closed - I was almost tempted to vote \"close\" more than a year", "you agree that this question fits the scope of the site, and if", "Do you agree that this question fits the scope of the site, and", "it, it got 59 upvotes and a ton of answers. Why? Because people", "\"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly unfair that this", "scope of the site, and if not, why has it not been closed?", "question? It asks for a list/examples of people fitting a certain criterion. This", "people fitting a certain criterion. This is so very obvious a shopping question", "This is so very obvious a shopping question to me, yet, instead of", "very obvious a shopping question to me, yet, instead of closing it, it", "tempted to vote \"close\" more than a year later when I stumbled upon", "been closed as a shopping question? It asks for a list/examples of people", "there was some reason why the question is still open, a reason that", "was almost tempted to vote \"close\" more than a year later when I", "is still open, a reason that I fail to see. So - Do", "question to me, yet, instead of closing it, it got 59 upvotes and", "a list/examples of people fitting a certain criterion. This is so very obvious", "thought maybe there was some reason why the question is still open, a", "closing it, it got 59 upvotes and a ton of answers. Why? Because", "question is still open, a reason that I fail to see. So -", "almost tempted to vote \"close\" more than a year later when I stumbled", "yet, instead of closing it, it got 59 upvotes and a ton of", "see. So - Do you agree that this question fits the scope of", "this question fits the scope of the site, and if not, why has", "it as a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to answer? It seems slightly", "a reason that I fail to see. So - Do you agree that", "question has not been closed - I was almost tempted to vote \"close\"", "that this question has not been closed - I was almost tempted to", "is so very obvious a shopping question to me, yet, instead of closing", "\"close\" more than a year later when I stumbled upon the question today,", "instead of closing it, it got 59 upvotes and a ton of answers.", "upvotes and a ton of answers. Why? Because people perceive it as a", "I was almost tempted to vote \"close\" more than a year later when", "list/examples of people fitting a certain criterion. This is so very obvious a", "a shopping question to me, yet, instead of closing it, it got 59", "unfair that this question has not been closed - I was almost tempted", "vote \"close\" more than a year later when I stumbled upon the question", "still open, a reason that I fail to see. So - Do you", "why the question is still open, a reason that I fail to see.", "of answers. Why? Because people perceive it as a \"fun\" question, even more", "not been closed - I was almost tempted to vote \"close\" more than", "I stumbled upon the question today, but thought maybe there was some reason", "fits the scope of the site, and if not, why has it not", "answer? It seems slightly unfair that this question has not been closed -", "to see. So - Do you agree that this question fits the scope", "me, yet, instead of closing it, it got 59 upvotes and a ton", "for a list/examples of people fitting a certain criterion. This is so very", "not been closed as a shopping question? It asks for a list/examples of", "asks for a list/examples of people fitting a certain criterion. This is so", "a shopping question? It asks for a list/examples of people fitting a certain", "criterion. This is so very obvious a shopping question to me, yet, instead", "upon the question today, but thought maybe there was some reason why the", "the question today, but thought maybe there was some reason why the question", "fitting a certain criterion. This is so very obvious a shopping question to", "got 59 upvotes and a ton of answers. Why? Because people perceive it", "ton of answers. Why? Because people perceive it as a \"fun\" question, even", "reason why the question is still open, a reason that I fail to", "I fail to see. So - Do you agree that this question fits", "maybe there was some reason why the question is still open, a reason", "obvious a shopping question to me, yet, instead of closing it, it got", "agree that this question fits the scope of the site, and if not,", "Why has [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/151174/what-are-some-examples-of-famous-scholars-with-low-h-index) not been closed as a shopping question? It asks for", "perceive it as a \"fun\" question, even more \"fun\" to answer? It seems", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/151174/what-are-some-examples-of-famous-scholars-with-low-h-index) not been closed as a shopping question? It asks for a list/examples" ]
[ "wiki entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at", "western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific to", "By not referring to specific somparison regions, those tags can be more inclusive.", "in other parts of the world. \| finished, will keep an eye on", "Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this comparison! By not referring to specific somparison", "\"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki entry \| deletion, replace", "questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent", "cleanup and for the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what are your thoughts?", "those tags can be more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to:", "the world. \| finished, will keep an eye on emerging new location tags", "used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering)", "replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created wiki", "Action \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \|", "tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep", "\"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \|", "tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity", "only 4 question, two of them duplicates of one of the other two", "only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show", "are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or", "\| --- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no", "replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity", "\| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4", "well without \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\")", "[germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific to Germany's higher", "harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On standards or conventions specific to the", "no \| only 5 questions (2 of which are closed), could be replaced", "\| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority", "\| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \| Where existent, tag wikis differ and", "a duplicate of the 4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged", "be replaced in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag", "parts of the world. \| finished, will keep an eye on emerging new", "and style from the systems in other parts of the world. \| finished,", "[inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions", "more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On standards or conventions", "specific country/region/continent, which differs in structure and style from the systems in other", "deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \|", "structure and style from the systems in other parts of the world. \|", "tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary in the only two instances where", "only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the", "or conventions specific to Germany's higher education system, which differs in structure and", "deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created", "tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \|", "duplicates of one of the other two (which is kind of a duplicate", "questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show", "tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only 5 questions (2 of which are closed),", "\| deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no", "least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show", "\| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only used twice,", "I have some suggestions for tag cleanup and for the harmonization of location-specific", "\| issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \|", "\| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4 question,", "tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion \|", "tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and", "a wiki entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or", "\"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well", "or conventions specific to the higher education system in** specific country/region/continent, which differs", "issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| ---", "'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4 question, two of them duplicates of one", "very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific", "--- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show", "specific to the higher education system in specific country/region/continent, which differs in structure", "of the world. \| finished, will keep an eye on emerging new location", "\| no \| only 5 questions (2 of which are closed), could be", "for tag cleanup and for the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what are", "(2 of which are closed), could be replaced in all instances with the", "regions, those tags can be more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis", "'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags", "other parts of the world. \| finished, will keep an eye on emerging", "questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4 question, two of them duplicates", "(which is kind of a duplicate of the 4th, could be replaced with", "which are closed), could be replaced in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show", "wikis, what are your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues \|", "comparison! By not referring to specific somparison regions, those tags can be more", "can be more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On standards", "with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show", "correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without \| deletion \| deleted", "\| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only used", "\"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry", "for the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what are your thoughts? \| Tag", "[inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki entry \| deletion,", "in** specific country/region/continent, which differs in structure and style from the systems in", "no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion \| deleted \| \|", "'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only", "(!) question \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\")", "structure and style from the systems in North America, Asia, or elsewhere in", "differs in structure and style from the systems in other parts of the", "\| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4 question, two", "replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show", "\| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only", "\| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| ---", "\| only 5 questions (2 of which are closed), could be replaced in", "of them duplicates of one of the other two (which is kind of", "\| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion \| deleted \|", "\| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only 5 questions", "[inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\")", "\| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct", "have some suggestions for tag cleanup and for the harmonization of location-specific tag", "your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested Action \|", "sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions", "North America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are", "keep tags separate, created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly", "the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki entry \|", "country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On standards or conventions specific to the higher education", "them duplicates of one of the other two (which is kind of a", "\"On standards or conventions specific to Germany's higher education system, which differs in", "tags can be more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On", "tag wikis differ and are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged", "\| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link", "\| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only", "the other two (which is kind of a duplicate of the 4th, could", "--- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only", "deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \|", "\"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific to Germany's higher education", "[(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged", "has a wiki entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\")", "to specific somparison regions, those tags can be more inclusive. \| harmonize all", "'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific to Germany's higher education system, which differs", "country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \| Where existent, tag wikis differ and are", "in North America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania", "deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do)", "'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show", "somparison regions, those tags can be more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag", "world. \| finished, will keep an eye on emerging new location tags \|", "with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged", "\| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary in", "\| only 4 question, two of them duplicates of one of the other", "suggestions for tag cleanup and for the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what", "closed (!) question \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged", "of one of the other two (which is kind of a duplicate of", "with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki entry", "and style from the systems in North America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\"", "or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \|", "[the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without \| deletion \| deleted \| \|", "and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without \| deletion \| deleted \|", "just as well without \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions", "to the higher education system in** specific country/region/continent, which differs in structure and", "to: On standards or conventions specific to the higher education system in** specific", "the only two instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion", "\"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged", "Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific to Germany's", "in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has", "is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show", "the systems in North America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa", "separate, created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \| Where", "[minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only 5 questions (2 of", "duplicate of the 4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\")", "no \| not necessary in the only two instances where it is used", "\| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed", "style from the systems in North America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South", "\"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only 5 questions (2 of which", "'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags", "standards or conventions specific to Germany's higher education system, which differs in structure", "at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing", "of a duplicate of the 4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions", "two (which is kind of a duplicate of the 4th, could be replaced", "referring to specific somparison regions, those tags can be more inclusive. \| harmonize", "\"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary in the only two", "--- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \|", "style from the systems in other parts of the world.* \| finished, will", "\| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not", "\| Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision \| \| ---", "necessary in the only two instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services)", "without \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \|", "Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned", "[mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary in the only", "question \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \|", "link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions", "questions (2 of which are closed), could be replaced in all instances with", "education system, which differs in structure and style from the systems in North", "\"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created wiki entry \| \|", "\| no \| not necessary in the only two instances where it is", "differs in structure and style from the systems in North America, Asia, or", "in Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this comparison!", "Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \|", "higher education system, which differs in structure and style from the systems in", "education system in** specific country/region/continent, which differs in structure and style from the", "partly \| Where existent, tag wikis differ and are sometimes very western-centric. Example:", "location-specific tag wikis, what are your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry \|", "not referring to specific somparison regions, those tags can be more inclusive. \|", "to Germany's higher education system, which differs in structure and style from the", "be more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On standards or", "used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions", "--- \| --- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \|", "deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link with", "systems in North America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa and", "\| keep tags separate, created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags \|", "and for the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what are your thoughts? \|", "Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision \| \|", "could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with", "\| not necessary in the only two instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions)", "or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in", "the higher education system in** specific country/region/continent, which differs in structure and style", "one of the other two (which is kind of a duplicate of the", "questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without", "Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this comparison! By not referring to", "questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion", "conventions specific to Germany's higher education system, which differs in structure and style", "as well without \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged", "tags separate, created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \|", "questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no", "tag which has a wiki entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions", "it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing", "4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace", "\| no \| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\")", "works just as well without \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show", "where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \| \|", "specific to Germany's higher education system, which differs in structure and style from", "[interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created wiki entry \|", "not necessary in the only two instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and", "Suggested Action \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| ---", "tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions", "[one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions", "existent, tag wikis differ and are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions", "all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a", "specific tags \| partly \| Where existent, tag wikis differ and are sometimes", "not mentioned in this comparison! By not referring to specific somparison regions, those", "\| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate,", "'minority'\") \| no \| only 5 questions (2 of which are closed), could", "only 5 questions (2 of which are closed), could be replaced in all", "the 4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion,", "with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created wiki entry", "no \| only 4 question, two of them duplicates of one of the", "in the only two instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \|", "deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary", "other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility", "are closed), could be replaced in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions", "questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \|", "'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without \| deletion", "the systems in other parts of the world. \| finished, will keep an", "entry \| issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision \| \| --- \| ---", "\"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4 question, two of them", "elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this", "--- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged", "\| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On standards or conventions specific to", "instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki", "from the systems in other parts of the world. \| finished, will keep", "4 question, two of them duplicates of one of the other two (which", "\| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!)", "in this comparison! By not referring to specific somparison regions, those tags can", "[(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \|", "could be replaced in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\")", "which differs in structure and style from the systems in North America, Asia,", "\"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \|", "some suggestions for tag cleanup and for the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis,", "from the systems in North America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America,", "entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \| Where existent, tag wikis", "this comparison! By not referring to specific somparison regions, those tags can be", "system, which differs in structure and style from the systems in North America,", "what are your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested", "[once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just", "tag cleanup and for the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what are your", "Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this comparison! By", "questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only 5 questions (2 of which are", "specific somparison regions, those tags can be more inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific", "is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without \| deletion \|", "\| deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no", "mentioned in this comparison! By not referring to specific somparison regions, those tags", "\| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only 5 questions (2", "\| partly \| Where existent, tag wikis differ and are sometimes very western-centric.", "'inclusivity'\") or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \|", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial", "'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question \| deletion \| deleted", "\"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\")", "entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least", "wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \| Where existent, tag", "\| \| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \| Where existent, tag wikis differ", "are not mentioned in this comparison! By not referring to specific somparison regions,", "which has a wiki entry \| deletion, replace with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged", "of the other two (which is kind of a duplicate of the 4th,", "other two (which is kind of a duplicate of the 4th, could be", "standards or conventions specific to the higher education system in** specific country/region/continent, which", "America, Asia, or elsewhere in Europe.\" South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not", "\| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag", "'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific to Germany's higher education system, which", "of which are closed), could be replaced in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity", "only two instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \|", "in structure and style from the systems in other parts of the world.", "America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this comparison! By not referring", "South America, Africa and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this comparison! By not", "question, two of them duplicates of one of the other two (which is", "tag wikis to: On standards or conventions specific to the higher education system", "Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision \| \| --- \|", "of location-specific tag wikis, what are your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry", "systems in other parts of the world. \| finished, will keep an eye", "\| Where existent, tag wikis differ and are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany", "thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision", "is kind of a duplicate of the 4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues", "higher education system in** specific country/region/continent, *which differs in structure and style from", "two instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted", "\| no \| only 4 question, two of them duplicates of one of", "Germany's higher education system, which differs in structure and style from the systems", "in structure and style from the systems in North America, Asia, or elsewhere", "\| Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested Action \| Decision \|", "[interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged", "5 questions (2 of which are closed), could be replaced in all instances", "differ and are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On", "\| \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| --- \| \|", "closed), could be replaced in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'inclusivity'\") \| \| \| [socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \|", "tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4 question, two of them duplicates of", "and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \| \| [nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\")", "and Australia/Oceania are not mentioned in this comparison! By not referring to specific", "\| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary in the", "country/region/continent, which differs in structure and style from the systems in other parts", "tags \| partly \| Where existent, tag wikis differ and are sometimes very", "all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: On standards or conventions specific to the higher", "instances where it is used [(1)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/147679/what-is-the-meaning-of-mobility-in-applying-for-postdoc-positions) and [(2)](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/143214/how-to-evaluate-foreign-credential-evaluation-services) \| deletion \| deleted \|", "conventions specific to the higher education system in** specific country/region/continent, which differs in", "and are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards", "kind of a duplicate of the 4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show", "replaced in all instances with the [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which", "deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no \| only 5", "harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what are your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki", "of the 4th, could be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \|", "wikis to: On standards or conventions specific to the higher education system in", "created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific tags \| partly \| Where existent,", "tag wikis, what are your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues", "'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary in the only two instances where it", "with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions", "system in specific country/region/continent, which differs in structure and style from the systems", "no \| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is", "Where existent, tag wikis differ and are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show", "[nursing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/nursing \"show questions tagged 'nursing'\") \| no \| only [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/174064/what-is-the-difference-between-a-bachelors-and-masters-in-nursing-should-i-do) closed (!) question", "[industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as", "questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") or at least link with [inclusivity](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/inclusivity \"show questions tagged 'inclusivity'\")", "questions tagged 'inclusivity'\") tag which has a wiki entry \| deletion, replace with", "[socializing](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/socializing \"show questions tagged 'socializing'\") \| no \| only 4 question, two of", "wikis differ and are sometimes very western-centric. Example: [germany](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/germany \"show questions tagged 'germany'\")", "are your thoughts? \| Tag \| Wiki entry \| issues \| Suggested Action", "which differs in structure and style from the systems in other parts of", "tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works just as well without \|", "\| deletion \| deleted \| \| [minority](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/minority \"show questions tagged 'minority'\") \| no", "deletion \| deleted \| \| [mobility](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/mobility \"show questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \|", "the harmonization of location-specific tag wikis, what are your thoughts? \| Tag \|", "[industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\") \| no \| tag only used twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p)", "\| Suggested Action \| Decision \| \| --- \| --- \| --- \|", "be replaced with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues \"show questions tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| deletion, replace with [interpersonal-issues](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/interpersonal-issues", "On standards or conventions specific to the higher education system in specific country/region/continent,", "questions tagged 'germany'\") \"On standards or conventions specific to Germany's higher education system,", "questions tagged 'mobility'\") \| no \| not necessary in the only two instances", "inclusive. \| harmonize all country/region/continent-specific tag wikis to: **On standards or conventions specific", "twice, [once](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/166147/does-working-in-a-research-group-with-poor-funding-means-poor-future-prospects-p) [industry](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industry \"show questions tagged 'industry'\") is correct and [the other](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/156433/how-good-are-taiwanese-universities-for-getting-phd-in-industrial-engineering) works", "tagged 'interpersonal-issues'\") \| keep tags separate, created wiki entry \| \| country/region/continent specific", "two of them duplicates of one of the other two (which is kind", "\| --- \| --- \| --- \| \| [industrial](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/industrial \"show questions tagged 'industrial'\")" ]
[ "adds nothing new. The worst cases are when someone just gives a subset", "for people to express agreement with the advice in an existing answer. ---", "user seems to get the point that this site isn't just a bunch", "new answer is just a bit of noise. Sometimes it will be ideas", "handed.* One possibility would just be some advice in the help pages. Not", "of the recommendations of an earlier answer. The new answer is just a", "existing answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted while", "\"discourage\" such posts without seeming too heavy handed.* One possibility would just be", "several instances lately, though I suspect it has always been the case, that", "gives a subset of the recommendations of an earlier answer. The new answer", "pages. Not every new user seems to get the point that this site", "heavy handed.* One possibility would just be some advice in the help pages.", "have mechanisms already in voting and comments for people to express agreement with", "new user seems to get the point that this site isn't just a", "cases are when someone just gives a subset of the recommendations of an", "noise. Sometimes it will be ideas from several answers, but still, nothing new.", "has always been the case, that someone will give a new answer that", "been the case, that someone will give a new answer that adds nothing", "just a bit of noise. Sometimes it will be ideas from several answers,", "We have mechanisms already in voting and comments for people to express agreement", "the help pages. Not every new user seems to get the point that", "help pages. Not every new user seems to get the point that this", "the advice in an existing answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this.", "subset of the recommendations of an earlier answer. The new answer is just", "that adds nothing new. The worst cases are when someone just gives a", "recommendations of an earlier answer. The new answer is just a bit of", "noticed several instances lately, though I suspect it has always been the case,", "nothing new. The worst cases are when someone just gives a subset of", "of discussion threads. That may be related. We have mechanisms already in voting", "be some advice in the help pages. Not every new user seems to", "already in voting and comments for people to express agreement with the advice", "answer. The new answer is just a bit of noise. Sometimes it will", "answer that adds nothing new. The worst cases are when someone just gives", "discussion threads. That may be related. We have mechanisms already in voting and", "One possibility would just be some advice in the help pages. Not every", "--- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted while I was", "earlier answer. The new answer is just a bit of noise. Sometimes it", "possible to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming too heavy handed.* One possibility would", "case, that someone will give a new answer that adds nothing new. The", "a new answer that adds nothing new. The worst cases are when someone", "is just a bit of noise. Sometimes it will be ideas from several", "to express agreement with the advice in an existing answer. --- [Here is", "to get the point that this site isn't just a bunch of discussion", "advice in the help pages. Not every new user seems to get the", "ideas from several answers, but still, nothing new. I wonder if it is", "writing. This has happened a couple of times. (Rep needed to see my", "has happened a couple of times. (Rep needed to see my deleted answer.)", "a bunch of discussion threads. That may be related. We have mechanisms already", "new. The worst cases are when someone just gives a subset of the", "answers, but still, nothing new. I wonder if it is desirable and possible", "Another user posted while I was writing. This has happened a couple of", "will be ideas from several answers, but still, nothing new. I wonder if", "get the point that this site isn't just a bunch of discussion threads.", "it will be ideas from several answers, but still, nothing new. I wonder", "an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted while I was writing. This has", "Not every new user seems to get the point that this site isn't", "related. We have mechanisms already in voting and comments for people to express", "I suspect it has always been the case, that someone will give a", "was writing. This has happened a couple of times. (Rep needed to see", "just be some advice in the help pages. Not every new user seems", "give a new answer that adds nothing new. The worst cases are when", "an earlier answer. The new answer is just a bit of noise. Sometimes", "advice in an existing answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another", "the case, that someone will give a new answer that adds nothing new.", "too heavy handed.* One possibility would just be some advice in the help", "of noise. Sometimes it will be ideas from several answers, but still, nothing", "possibility would just be some advice in the help pages. Not every new", "someone just gives a subset of the recommendations of an earlier answer. The", "to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming too heavy handed.* One possibility would just", "new answer that adds nothing new. The worst cases are when someone just", "with the advice in an existing answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of", "[Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted while I was writing.", "This has happened a couple of times. (Rep needed to see my deleted", "is desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming too heavy handed.", "but still, nothing new. I wonder if it is desirable and possible to", "new. I wonder if it is desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such posts", "that someone will give a new answer that adds nothing new. The worst", "The new answer is just a bit of noise. Sometimes it will be", "in the help pages. Not every new user seems to get the point", "The worst cases are when someone just gives a subset of the recommendations", "That may be related. We have mechanisms already in voting and comments for", "suspect it has always been the case, that someone will give a new", "it has always been the case, that someone will give a new answer", "a bit of noise. Sometimes it will be ideas from several answers, but", "the point that this site isn't just a bunch of discussion threads. That", "just a bunch of discussion threads. That may be related. We have mechanisms", "voting and comments for people to express agreement with the advice in an", "instances lately, though I suspect it has always been the case, that someone", "without seeming too heavy handed. One possibility would just be some advice in", "someone will give a new answer that adds nothing new. The worst cases", "answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted while I", "and possible to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming too heavy handed.* One possibility", "though I suspect it has always been the case, that someone will give", "when someone just gives a subset of the recommendations of an earlier answer.", "be related. We have mechanisms already in voting and comments for people to", "worst cases are when someone just gives a subset of the recommendations of", "of an earlier answer. The new answer is just a bit of noise.", "nothing new. I wonder if it is desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such", "just gives a subset of the recommendations of an earlier answer. The new", "lately, though I suspect it has always been the case, that someone will", "mechanisms already in voting and comments for people to express agreement with the", "are when someone just gives a subset of the recommendations of an earlier", "posted while I was writing. This has happened a couple of times. (Rep", "some advice in the help pages. Not every new user seems to get", "wonder if it is desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming", "a subset of the recommendations of an earlier answer. The new answer is", "seems to get the point that this site isn't just a bunch of", "always been the case, that someone will give a new answer that adds", "in voting and comments for people to express agreement with the advice in", "desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming too heavy handed. One", "bunch of discussion threads. That may be related. We have mechanisms already in", "and comments for people to express agreement with the advice in an existing", "bit of noise. Sometimes it will be ideas from several answers, but still,", "while I was writing. This has happened a couple of times. (Rep needed", "posts without seeming too heavy handed.* One possibility would just be some advice", "isn't just a bunch of discussion threads. That may be related. We have", "threads. That may be related. We have mechanisms already in voting and comments", "every new user seems to get the point that this site isn't just", "people to express agreement with the advice in an existing answer. --- [Here", "several answers, but still, nothing new. I wonder if it is desirable and", "that this site isn't just a bunch of discussion threads. That may be", "of this. Another user posted while I was writing. This has happened a", "would just be some advice in the help pages. Not every new user", "may be related. We have mechanisms already in voting and comments for people", "I've noticed several instances lately, though I suspect it has always been the", "seeming too heavy handed. One possibility would just be some advice in the", "user posted while I was writing. This has happened a couple of times.", "I wonder if it is desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such posts without", "example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted while I was writing. This has happened", "be ideas from several answers, but still, nothing new. I wonder if it", "site isn't just a bunch of discussion threads. That may be related. We", "point that this site isn't just a bunch of discussion threads. That may", "an existing answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted", "this site isn't just a bunch of discussion threads. That may be related.", "will give a new answer that adds nothing new. The worst cases are", "express agreement with the advice in an existing answer. --- [Here is an", "comments for people to express agreement with the advice in an existing answer.", "agreement with the advice in an existing answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368)", "in an existing answer. --- [Here is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user", "the recommendations of an earlier answer. The new answer is just a bit", "from several answers, but still, nothing new. I wonder if it is desirable", "such posts without seeming too heavy handed. One possibility would just be some", "I was writing. This has happened a couple of times. (Rep needed to", "it is desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming too heavy", "Sometimes it will be ideas from several answers, but still, nothing new. I", "answer is just a bit of noise. Sometimes it will be ideas from", "this. Another user posted while I was writing. This has happened a couple", "if it is desirable and possible to \"discourage\" such posts without seeming too", "is an example](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/180262/75368) of this. Another user posted while I was writing. This", "still, nothing new. I wonder if it is desirable and possible to \"discourage\"" ]
[ "concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses the common belief of", "of viewpoint. It also alienates large portions of the public who support free", "in this sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause acute harm to the neutrality", "term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and should not be eradicated", "of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are concerned it is", "solution to the problem faced by the OP. Indeed, since it is accepted", "term is non-offensive. They also express their fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\"", "the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and should not", "a non-offending and not to be eradicated from the public sphere term, the", "since it is accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and", "that they are concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses the", "up votes (with a total score of 14 votes when deleted). The OP", "agrees that the term is non-offensive. They also express their fondness of the", "answers cause acute harm to the neutrality of the website and to its", "certainly a legitimate answer in this sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause acute", "non-offensive, and should not be eradicated from the public sphere. It garnered 27", "not be eradicated from the public sphere. It garnered 27 up votes (with", "and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the traditional term", "\"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the traditional", "inclusive and non-offensive, and should not be eradicated from the public sphere. It", "legitimate answer in this sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause acute harm to", "of many, that this phrase is inclusive enough, and thus provides a legitimate", "the public sphere term, the provided solution is certainly a legitimate answer in", "My answer claims that the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and", "phrase, only that they are concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply", "many, that this phrase is inclusive enough, and thus provides a legitimate solution", "accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not to be", "this sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause acute harm to the neutrality of", "simply expresses the common belief of many, that this phrase is inclusive enough,", "score of 14 votes when deleted). The OP agrees that the term is", "to use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer", "their fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are concerned", "to the problem faced by the OP. Indeed, since it is accepted now", "not to be eradicated from the public sphere term, the provided solution is", "this phrase is inclusive enough, and thus provides a legitimate solution to the", "answer claims that the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive,", "the common belief of many, that this phrase is inclusive enough, and thus", "acute harm to the neutrality of the website and to its reputation as", "gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the traditional term \"ladies", "phrase to use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My", "is a nice phrase to use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be", "they are concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses the common", "problem faced by the OP. Indeed, since it is accepted now that \"ladies", "Overall, deleting such answers cause acute harm to the neutrality of the website", "phrase is inclusive enough, and thus provides a legitimate solution to the problem", "that the term is non-offensive. They also express their fondness of the \"Ladies", "the problem faced by the OP. Indeed, since it is accepted now that", "of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the", "\"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not to be eradicated from the", "faced by the OP. Indeed, since it is accepted now that \"ladies and", "use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims", "that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not to be eradicated from", "garnered 27 up votes (with a total score of 14 votes when deleted).", "\"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are concerned it is not-inclusive enough.", "(with a total score of 14 votes when deleted). The OP agrees that", "neutrality of the website and to its reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint.", "is a non-offending and not to be eradicated from the public sphere term,", "the OP. Indeed, since it is accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is", "It garnered 27 up votes (with a total score of 14 votes when", "are concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses the common belief", "viewpoint. It also alienates large portions of the public who support free respectful", "be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\"", "deleted). The OP agrees that the term is non-offensive. They also express their", "gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not to be eradicated from the public sphere", "to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the traditional term \"ladies and", "non-offensive. They also express their fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only", "traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and should not be", "inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive", "is inclusive and non-offensive, and should not be eradicated from the public sphere.", "public sphere. It garnered 27 up votes (with a total score of 14", "deleting such answers cause acute harm to the neutrality of the website and", "the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are concerned it is not-inclusive", "vote for reopening my answer to: [What is a nice phrase to use", "is non-offensive. They also express their fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase,", "answer in this sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause acute harm to the", "legitimate solution to the problem faced by the OP. Indeed, since it is", "14 votes when deleted). The OP agrees that the term is non-offensive. They", "a total score of 14 votes when deleted). The OP agrees that the", "sphere term, the provided solution is certainly a legitimate answer in this sense.", "the website and to its reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint. It also", "reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates large portions of the", "be eradicated from the public sphere term, the provided solution is certainly a", "and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and should not be eradicated from the", "a legitimate solution to the problem faced by the OP. Indeed, since it", "to the neutrality of the website and to its reputation as providing diversity", "Please vote for reopening my answer to: [What is a nice phrase to", "a legitimate answer in this sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause acute harm", "not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses the common belief of many, that this", "fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are concerned it", "provides a legitimate solution to the problem faced by the OP. Indeed, since", "is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses the common belief of many, that", "more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is", "harm to the neutrality of the website and to its reputation as providing", "Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My answer", "now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not to be eradicated", "public sphere term, the provided solution is certainly a legitimate answer in this", "it is accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not", "it is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses the common belief of many,", "sphere. It garnered 27 up votes (with a total score of 14 votes", "claims that the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and", "answer simply expresses the common belief of many, that this phrase is inclusive", "sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause acute harm to the neutrality of the", "that this phrase is inclusive enough, and thus provides a legitimate solution to", "eradicated from the public sphere term, the provided solution is certainly a legitimate", "nice phrase to use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325)", "a nice phrase to use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more", "is certainly a legitimate answer in this sense. Overall, deleting such answers cause", "such answers cause acute harm to the neutrality of the website and to", "that the traditional term \"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and should", "as providing diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates large portions of the public", "and to its reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates large", "eradicated from the public sphere. It garnered 27 up votes (with a total", "cause acute harm to the neutrality of the website and to its reputation", "be eradicated from the public sphere. It garnered 27 up votes (with a", "common belief of many, that this phrase is inclusive enough, and thus provides", "by the OP. Indeed, since it is accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\"", "and not to be eradicated from the public sphere term, the provided solution", "to be eradicated from the public sphere term, the provided solution is certainly", "when deleted). The OP agrees that the term is non-offensive. They also express", "is accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not to", "also express their fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they", "27 up votes (with a total score of 14 votes when deleted). The", "They also express their fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that", "The OP agrees that the term is non-offensive. They also express their fondness", "OP agrees that the term is non-offensive. They also express their fondness of", "of the website and to its reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint. It", "of 14 votes when deleted). The OP agrees that the term is non-offensive.", "the public sphere. It garnered 27 up votes (with a total score of", "the neutrality of the website and to its reputation as providing diversity of", "the provided solution is certainly a legitimate answer in this sense. Overall, deleting", "enough. My answer simply expresses the common belief of many, that this phrase", "to: [What is a nice phrase to use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\"", "enough, and thus provides a legitimate solution to the problem faced by the", "gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and should not be eradicated from the public", "to its reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates large portions", "term, the provided solution is certainly a legitimate answer in this sense. Overall,", "website and to its reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates", "express their fondness of the \"Ladies and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are", "thus provides a legitimate solution to the problem faced by the OP. Indeed,", "votes when deleted). The OP agrees that the term is non-offensive. They also", "is inclusive enough, and thus provides a legitimate solution to the problem faced", "reopening my answer to: [What is a nice phrase to use instead of", "and non-offensive, and should not be eradicated from the public sphere. It garnered", "inclusive enough, and thus provides a legitimate solution to the problem faced by", "providing diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates large portions of the public who", "and gentlemen\" is a non-offending and not to be eradicated from the public", "Indeed, since it is accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a non-offending", "for reopening my answer to: [What is a nice phrase to use instead", "votes (with a total score of 14 votes when deleted). The OP agrees", "My answer simply expresses the common belief of many, that this phrase is", "It also alienates large portions of the public who support free respectful discussion.", "instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to be more inclusive?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/180313/what-is-a-nice-phrase-to-use-instead-of-ladies-and-gentlemen-to-be-more-inclus/180325#180325) My answer claims that", "diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates large portions of the public who support", "total score of 14 votes when deleted). The OP agrees that the term", "and should not be eradicated from the public sphere. It garnered 27 up", "from the public sphere. It garnered 27 up votes (with a total score", "the term is non-offensive. They also express their fondness of the \"Ladies and", "OP. Indeed, since it is accepted now that \"ladies and gentlemen\" is a", "its reputation as providing diversity of viewpoint. It also alienates large portions of", "\"ladies and gentlemen\" is inclusive and non-offensive, and should not be eradicated from", "non-offending and not to be eradicated from the public sphere term, the provided", "[What is a nice phrase to use instead of \"ladies and gentlemen\" to", "from the public sphere term, the provided solution is certainly a legitimate answer", "belief of many, that this phrase is inclusive enough, and thus provides a", "and Gentlemen\" phrase, only that they are concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My", "my answer to: [What is a nice phrase to use instead of \"ladies", "and thus provides a legitimate solution to the problem faced by the OP.", "answer to: [What is a nice phrase to use instead of \"ladies and", "only that they are concerned it is not-inclusive enough. My answer simply expresses", "expresses the common belief of many, that this phrase is inclusive enough, and", "provided solution is certainly a legitimate answer in this sense. Overall, deleting such", "solution is certainly a legitimate answer in this sense. Overall, deleting such answers", "should not be eradicated from the public sphere. It garnered 27 up votes" ]
[ "purposes and I respect that). I still do not know the answers to", "the answers to these questions. I'm currently on my last year of undergraduate", "I have a lot of questions. There are many weird factors at play,", "I respect that). I still do not know the answers to these questions.", "Europe, but as an international, and thus I have a lot of questions.", "only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several questions that I ended up not", "but as an international, and thus I have a lot of questions. There", "violate the guidelines, I understand that this site has its purposes and I", "of questions. There are many weird factors at play, so my question is:", "of them do violate the guidelines, I understand that this site has its", "ended up not posting (some of them do violate the guidelines, I understand", "currently on my last year of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as an", "respect that). I still do not know the answers to these questions. I'm", "academia or PhD students. One can feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\".", "know the answers to these questions. I'm currently on my last year of", "(some of them do violate the guidelines, I understand that this site has", "I still do not know the answers to these questions. I'm currently on", "suited for people in my position (that is, confused soon to graduate kids)?", "thus I have a lot of questions. There are many weird factors at", "to these questions. I'm currently on my last year of undergraduate studies, in", "Is there a stackexchange suited for people in my position (that is, confused", "\"meant\" for people working in academia or PhD students. One can feel that", "that this site has its purposes and I respect that). I still do", "my question is: Is there a stackexchange suited for people in my position", "still do not know the answers to these questions. I'm currently on my", "year of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as an international, and thus I", "up not posting (some of them do violate the guidelines, I understand that", "and I respect that). I still do not know the answers to these", "in academia or PhD students. One can feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat", "there a stackexchange suited for people in my position (that is, confused soon", "my last year of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as an international, and", "students. One can feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written", "question is: Is there a stackexchange suited for people in my position (that", "factors at play, so my question is: Is there a stackexchange suited for", "working in academia or PhD students. One can feel that undergraduates are only", "undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as an international, and thus I have a", "several questions that I ended up not posting (some of them do violate", "the guidelines, I understand that this site has its purposes and I respect", "do violate the guidelines, I understand that this site has its purposes and", "guidelines, I understand that this site has its purposes and I respect that).", "or PhD students. One can feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I", "stackexchange suited for people in my position (that is, confused soon to graduate", "feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several questions that", "a lot of questions. There are many weird factors at play, so my", "as an international, and thus I have a lot of questions. There are", "undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several questions that I ended", "posting (some of them do violate the guidelines, I understand that this site", "questions. There are many weird factors at play, so my question is: Is", "that). I still do not know the answers to these questions. I'm currently", "play, so my question is: Is there a stackexchange suited for people in", "can feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several questions", "last year of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as an international, and thus", "of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as an international, and thus I have", "PhD students. One can feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have", "lot of questions. There are many weird factors at play, so my question", "questions. I'm currently on my last year of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but", "One can feel that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several", "an international, and thus I have a lot of questions. There are many", "for people working in academia or PhD students. One can feel that undergraduates", "I understand that this site has its purposes and I respect that). I", "do not know the answers to these questions. I'm currently on my last", "is \"meant\" for people working in academia or PhD students. One can feel", "that I ended up not posting (some of them do violate the guidelines,", "I'm currently on my last year of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as", "I ended up not posting (some of them do violate the guidelines, I", "this site has its purposes and I respect that). I still do not", "is: Is there a stackexchange suited for people in my position (that is,", "This stackexchange is \"meant\" for people working in academia or PhD students. One", "studies, in Europe, but as an international, and thus I have a lot", "tolerated\". I have written several questions that I ended up not posting (some", "stackexchange is \"meant\" for people working in academia or PhD students. One can", "not posting (some of them do violate the guidelines, I understand that this", "answers to these questions. I'm currently on my last year of undergraduate studies,", "understand that this site has its purposes and I respect that). I still", "people working in academia or PhD students. One can feel that undergraduates are", "There are many weird factors at play, so my question is: Is there", "at play, so my question is: Is there a stackexchange suited for people", "these questions. I'm currently on my last year of undergraduate studies, in Europe,", "weird factors at play, so my question is: Is there a stackexchange suited", "has its purposes and I respect that). I still do not know the", "and thus I have a lot of questions. There are many weird factors", "that undergraduates are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several questions that I", "site has its purposes and I respect that). I still do not know", "a stackexchange suited for people in my position (that is, confused soon to", "in Europe, but as an international, and thus I have a lot of", "so my question is: Is there a stackexchange suited for people in my", "international, and thus I have a lot of questions. There are many weird", "have written several questions that I ended up not posting (some of them", "\"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several questions that I ended up not posting", "its purposes and I respect that). I still do not know the answers", "questions that I ended up not posting (some of them do violate the", "many weird factors at play, so my question is: Is there a stackexchange", "have a lot of questions. There are many weird factors at play, so", "are many weird factors at play, so my question is: Is there a", "are only \"somewhat tolerated\". I have written several questions that I ended up", "them do violate the guidelines, I understand that this site has its purposes", "written several questions that I ended up not posting (some of them do", "on my last year of undergraduate studies, in Europe, but as an international,", "I have written several questions that I ended up not posting (some of", "not know the answers to these questions. I'm currently on my last year" ]
[ "I don't have any references, but I've observed this too. One time, there", "this is particularly annoying when the asker states that they are an \"expert\"", "is based on an observation from many years of teaching) and the reply", "where the question says quite clearly something like: > > I am looking", "popular questions where far more people have the upvote privilege than the downvote", "be fair, often there are no studies that anyone is aware of, and", "we should move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is it fine and there", "the reference request is based on an observation from many years of teaching)", "or studies. > > > And yet the top answer (often quite upvoted)", "have been a few flags) where the question says quite clearly something like:", "observation from many years of teaching) and the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g.,", "really interested in anecdotes or opinions; I am looking for data or studies.", "not really interested in anecdotes or opinions; I am looking for data or", "questions where far more people have the upvote privilege than the downvote privilege).", "years of teaching) and the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion", "that [opinion and speculation].... > > > To me, this is particularly annoying", "all answers that don't contain solid references, the question will go unanswered. So:", "reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle these answers does not seem to be", "quite clearly something like: > > I am looking for references about [some", "where far more people have the upvote privilege than the downvote privilege). And", "that we should move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is it fine and", "or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle these answers does not seem to", "aware of, and so if we delete all answers that don't contain solid", "that they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is based on an", "to make this slightly more concrete, but feel free to add your thoughts", "there have been a few flags) where the question says quite clearly something", "is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to", "fair, often there are no studies that anyone is aware of, and so", "towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is it fine and there is nothing to", "references about [some topic]. I'm not really interested in anecdotes or opinions; I", "is: > > Well, I don't have any references, but I've observed this", "move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is it fine and there is nothing", "a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle these answers does", "don't contain solid references, the question will go unanswered. So: I am just", "the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on", "(and there have been a few flags) where the question says quite clearly", "have noticed several instances (and there have been a few flags) where the", "So: I am just trying to get a sense for how people feel", "is particularly annoying when the asker states that they are an \"expert\" (e.g.,", "sense for how people feel about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that", "noticed several instances (and there have been a few flags) where the question", "downvotes to handle these answers does not seem to be working (particularly on", "[anecdote].... It seems to me that [opinion and speculation].... > > > To", "and so if we delete all answers that don't contain solid references, the", "solid references, the question will go unanswered. So: I am just trying to", "many years of teaching) and the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's", "> > > To me, this is particularly annoying when the asker states", "anecdotes or opinions; I am looking for data or studies. > > >", "(e.g., the reference request is based on an observation from many years of", "this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move towards discouraging or", "was an [anecdote].... It seems to me that [opinion and speculation].... > >", "> > I am looking for references about [some topic]. I'm not really", "to me that [opinion and speculation].... > > > To me, this is", "particularly annoying when the asker states that they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the", "a sense for how people feel about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior", "see here? I'll add some voting options to make this slightly more concrete,", "we delete all answers that don't contain solid references, the question will go", "discouraging or disallowing? Or is it fine and there is nothing to see", "speculation].... > > > To me, this is particularly annoying when the asker", "question says quite clearly something like: > > I am looking for references", "delete all answers that don't contain solid references, the question will go unanswered.", "no studies that anyone is aware of, and so if we delete all", "or disallowing? Or is it fine and there is nothing to see here?", "working (particularly on popular questions where far more people have the upvote privilege", "answer (often quite upvoted) is: > > Well, I don't have any references,", "make this slightly more concrete, but feel free to add your thoughts in", "references, but I've observed this too. One time, there was an [anecdote].... It", "I am looking for references about [some topic]. I'm not really interested in", "[some topic]. I'm not really interested in anecdotes or opinions; I am looking", "Or is it fine and there is nothing to see here? I'll add", "top answer (often quite upvoted) is: > > Well, I don't have any", "that don't contain solid references, the question will go unanswered. So: I am", "am looking for data or studies. > > > And yet the top", "student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle these answers does not", "reference request is based on an observation from many years of teaching) and", "(e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle these answers", "upvote privilege than the downvote privilege). And to be fair, often there are", "if we delete all answers that don't contain solid references, the question will", "I've observed this too. One time, there was an [anecdote].... It seems to", "some voting options to make this slightly more concrete, but feel free to", "be working (particularly on popular questions where far more people have the upvote", "And to be fair, often there are no studies that anyone is aware", "often there are no studies that anyone is aware of, and so if", "the question says quite clearly something like: > > I am looking for", "upvoted) is: > > Well, I don't have any references, but I've observed", "or opinions; I am looking for data or studies. > > > And", "answers that don't contain solid references, the question will go unanswered. So: I", "sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle these", "are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is based on an observation from", "the upvote privilege than the downvote privilege). And to be fair, often there", "slightly more concrete, but feel free to add your thoughts in an answer.", "seems to me that [opinion and speculation].... > > > To me, this", "> > > And yet the top answer (often quite upvoted) is: >", "more people have the upvote privilege than the downvote privilege). And to be", "go unanswered. So: I am just trying to get a sense for how", "this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or", "> > And yet the top answer (often quite upvoted) is: > >", "a few flags) where the question says quite clearly something like: > >", "and the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying", "been a few flags) where the question says quite clearly something like: >", "an [anecdote].... It seems to me that [opinion and speculation].... > > >", "are no studies that anyone is aware of, and so if we delete", "studies. > > > And yet the top answer (often quite upvoted) is:", "privilege). And to be fair, often there are no studies that anyone is", "data or studies. > > > And yet the top answer (often quite", "asker states that they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is based", "this too. One time, there was an [anecdote].... It seems to me that", "quite upvoted) is: > > Well, I don't have any references, but I've", "trying to get a sense for how people feel about this. Is this", "to see here? I'll add some voting options to make this slightly more", "flags) where the question says quite clearly something like: > > I am", "there was an [anecdote].... It seems to me that [opinion and speculation].... >", "an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is based on an observation from many", "is aware of, and so if we delete all answers that don't contain", "the downvote privilege). And to be fair, often there are no studies that", "get a sense for how people feel about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal", "opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle these answers does not seem", "me that [opinion and speculation].... > > > To me, this is particularly", "contain solid references, the question will go unanswered. So: I am just trying", "> And yet the top answer (often quite upvoted) is: > > Well,", "they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is based on an observation", "request is based on an observation from many years of teaching) and the", "studies that anyone is aware of, and so if we delete all answers", "have any references, but I've observed this too. One time, there was an", "should move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is it fine and there is", "just trying to get a sense for how people feel about this. Is", "how people feel about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should", "add some voting options to make this slightly more concrete, but feel free", "(often quite upvoted) is: > > Well, I don't have any references, but", "when the asker states that they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request", "on an observation from many years of teaching) and the reply is \"common", "to be working (particularly on popular questions where far more people have the", "people feel about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move", "have the upvote privilege than the downvote privilege). And to be fair, often", "several instances (and there have been a few flags) where the question says", "in anecdotes or opinions; I am looking for data or studies. > >", "interested in anecdotes or opinions; I am looking for data or studies. >", "so if we delete all answers that don't contain solid references, the question", "few flags) where the question says quite clearly something like: > > I", "options to make this slightly more concrete, but feel free to add your", "behavior that we should move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is it fine", "> To me, this is particularly annoying when the asker states that they", "there is nothing to see here? I'll add some voting options to make", "question will go unanswered. So: I am just trying to get a sense", "an observation from many years of teaching) and the reply is \"common sense\"", "Relying on downvotes to handle these answers does not seem to be working", "here? I'll add some voting options to make this slightly more concrete, but", "One time, there was an [anecdote].... It seems to me that [opinion and", "is it fine and there is nothing to see here? I'll add some", "but I've observed this too. One time, there was an [anecdote].... It seems", "opinions; I am looking for data or studies. > > > And yet", "the question will go unanswered. So: I am just trying to get a", "answers does not seem to be working (particularly on popular questions where far", "for data or studies. > > > And yet the top answer (often", "I'm not really interested in anecdotes or opinions; I am looking for data", "reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes", "and speculation].... > > > To me, this is particularly annoying when the", "is nothing to see here? I'll add some voting options to make this", "yet the top answer (often quite upvoted) is: > > Well, I don't", "there are no studies that anyone is aware of, and so if we", "of, and so if we delete all answers that don't contain solid references,", "I have noticed several instances (and there have been a few flags) where", "based on an observation from many years of teaching) and the reply is", "> Well, I don't have any references, but I've observed this too. One", "from many years of teaching) and the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a", "that anyone is aware of, and so if we delete all answers that", "instances (and there have been a few flags) where the question says quite", "disallowing? Or is it fine and there is nothing to see here? I'll", "me, this is particularly annoying when the asker states that they are an", "Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move towards discouraging or disallowing?", "the top answer (often quite upvoted) is: > > Well, I don't have", "something like: > > I am looking for references about [some topic]. I'm", "a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is", "does not seem to be working (particularly on popular questions where far more", "am just trying to get a sense for how people feel about this.", "observed this too. One time, there was an [anecdote].... It seems to me", "> I am looking for references about [some topic]. I'm not really interested", "\"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is based on an observation from many years", "says quite clearly something like: > > I am looking for references about", "nothing to see here? I'll add some voting options to make this slightly", "[opinion and speculation].... > > > To me, this is particularly annoying when", "am looking for references about [some topic]. I'm not really interested in anecdotes", "> > To me, this is particularly annoying when the asker states that", "To me, this is particularly annoying when the asker states that they are", "to get a sense for how people feel about this. Is this a", "looking for references about [some topic]. I'm not really interested in anecdotes or", "for references about [some topic]. I'm not really interested in anecdotes or opinions;", "on downvotes to handle these answers does not seem to be working (particularly", "(particularly on popular questions where far more people have the upvote privilege than", "voting options to make this slightly more concrete, but feel free to add", "downvote privilege). And to be fair, often there are no studies that anyone", "and there is nothing to see here? I'll add some voting options to", "to be fair, often there are no studies that anyone is aware of,", "about [some topic]. I'm not really interested in anecdotes or opinions; I am", "people have the upvote privilege than the downvote privilege). And to be fair,", "clearly something like: > > I am looking for references about [some topic].", "than the downvote privilege). And to be fair, often there are no studies", "handle these answers does not seem to be working (particularly on popular questions", "Well, I don't have any references, but I've observed this too. One time,", "privilege than the downvote privilege). And to be fair, often there are no", "these answers does not seem to be working (particularly on popular questions where", "unanswered. So: I am just trying to get a sense for how people", "like: > > I am looking for references about [some topic]. I'm not", "of teaching) and the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or", "feel about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move towards", "the asker states that they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is", "references, the question will go unanswered. So: I am just trying to get", "I'll add some voting options to make this slightly more concrete, but feel", "problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move towards discouraging or disallowing? Or is it", "states that they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference request is based on", "And yet the top answer (often quite upvoted) is: > > Well, I", "on popular questions where far more people have the upvote privilege than the", "far more people have the upvote privilege than the downvote privilege). And to", "topic]. I'm not really interested in anecdotes or opinions; I am looking for", "for how people feel about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we", "I am looking for data or studies. > > > And yet the", "looking for data or studies. > > > And yet the top answer", "any references, but I've observed this too. One time, there was an [anecdote]....", "this slightly more concrete, but feel free to add your thoughts in an", "\"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning). Relying on downvotes to handle", "not seem to be working (particularly on popular questions where far more people", "will go unanswered. So: I am just trying to get a sense for", "fine and there is nothing to see here? I'll add some voting options", "to handle these answers does not seem to be working (particularly on popular", "teaching) and the reply is \"common sense\" (e.g., a student's opinion or reasoning).", "don't have any references, but I've observed this too. One time, there was", "it fine and there is nothing to see here? I'll add some voting", "I am just trying to get a sense for how people feel about", "annoying when the asker states that they are an \"expert\" (e.g., the reference", "It seems to me that [opinion and speculation].... > > > To me,", "anyone is aware of, and so if we delete all answers that don't", "about this. Is this a problem/annoyance/sub-optimal behavior that we should move towards discouraging", "> > Well, I don't have any references, but I've observed this too.", "time, there was an [anecdote].... It seems to me that [opinion and speculation]....", "too. One time, there was an [anecdote].... It seems to me that [opinion", "seem to be working (particularly on popular questions where far more people have" ]
[ "delete-worthy tag (or I did not see it.) Is there an easier way", "possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I did not see it.) Is", "of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I did not see it.) Is there", "tag. But once created, the tag continues to exist. From the looks of", "the tag. But once created, the tag continues to exist. From the looks", "such a tag to attention of users of sufficient reputation than to make", "looks of it, this tag was created by mistake and should thus be", "[t](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/t \"show questions tagged 't'\") on it - I have edited the post", "From the looks of it, this tag was created by mistake and should", "thus be deleted. Yet, on the tag site, there is no possibility of", "[This post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181303/maintaining-a-public-handbook-collaborative-editing-online-viewing-plus-good) had the tag [t](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/t \"show questions tagged 't'\") on it -", "edited the post and deleted the tag. But once created, the tag continues", "an easier way to bring such a tag to attention of users of", "exist. From the looks of it, this tag was created by mistake and", "the tag [t](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/t \"show questions tagged 't'\") on it - I have edited", "tagged 't'\") on it - I have edited the post and deleted the", "bring such a tag to attention of users of sufficient reputation than to", "to attention of users of sufficient reputation than to make a post here?", "mistake and should thus be deleted. Yet, on the tag site, there is", "deleted the tag. But once created, the tag continues to exist. From the", "by mistake and should thus be deleted. Yet, on the tag site, there", "was created by mistake and should thus be deleted. Yet, on the tag", "tag continues to exist. From the looks of it, this tag was created", "the looks of it, this tag was created by mistake and should thus", "the post and deleted the tag. But once created, the tag continues to", "(or I did not see it.) Is there an easier way to bring", "it.) Is there an easier way to bring such a tag to attention", "tag [t](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/t \"show questions tagged 't'\") on it - I have edited the", "continues to exist. From the looks of it, this tag was created by", "questions tagged 't'\") on it - I have edited the post and deleted", "the tag continues to exist. From the looks of it, this tag was", "see it.) Is there an easier way to bring such a tag to", "tag (or I did not see it.) Is there an easier way to", "have edited the post and deleted the tag. But once created, the tag", "But once created, the tag continues to exist. From the looks of it,", "tag was created by mistake and should thus be deleted. Yet, on the", "- I have edited the post and deleted the tag. But once created,", "the tag site, there is no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or", "of it, this tag was created by mistake and should thus be deleted.", "it - I have edited the post and deleted the tag. But once", "a delete-worthy tag (or I did not see it.) Is there an easier", "way to bring such a tag to attention of users of sufficient reputation", "site, there is no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I did", "'t'\") on it - I have edited the post and deleted the tag.", "once created, the tag continues to exist. From the looks of it, this", "and deleted the tag. But once created, the tag continues to exist. From", "this tag was created by mistake and should thus be deleted. Yet, on", "created, the tag continues to exist. From the looks of it, this tag", "created by mistake and should thus be deleted. Yet, on the tag site,", "had the tag [t](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/t \"show questions tagged 't'\") on it - I have", "tag site, there is no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I", "there an easier way to bring such a tag to attention of users", "Yet, on the tag site, there is no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy", "not see it.) Is there an easier way to bring such a tag", "on it - I have edited the post and deleted the tag. But", "I have edited the post and deleted the tag. But once created, the", "and should thus be deleted. Yet, on the tag site, there is no", "to bring such a tag to attention of users of sufficient reputation than", "should thus be deleted. Yet, on the tag site, there is no possibility", "on the tag site, there is no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag", "no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I did not see it.)", "Is there an easier way to bring such a tag to attention of", "there is no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I did not", "flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I did not see it.) Is there an", "post and deleted the tag. But once created, the tag continues to exist.", "deleted. Yet, on the tag site, there is no possibility of flagging a", "a tag to attention of users of sufficient reputation than to make a", "easier way to bring such a tag to attention of users of sufficient", "tag to attention of users of sufficient reputation than to make a post", "I did not see it.) Is there an easier way to bring such", "did not see it.) Is there an easier way to bring such a", "to exist. From the looks of it, this tag was created by mistake", "\"show questions tagged 't'\") on it - I have edited the post and", "post](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181303/maintaining-a-public-handbook-collaborative-editing-online-viewing-plus-good) had the tag [t](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/t \"show questions tagged 't'\") on it - I", "it, this tag was created by mistake and should thus be deleted. Yet,", "is no possibility of flagging a delete-worthy tag (or I did not see", "be deleted. Yet, on the tag site, there is no possibility of flagging" ]
[ "consider the 30 years to be a bit restrictive (50 years would be", "relevant open problem in the last 30 years and having initally been mistaken", "initally been mistaken for a crank. There are lots of answers obviously not", "30 years and having initally been mistaken for a crank. There are lots", "I'd consider the 30 years to be a bit restrictive (50 years would", "example of researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular having solved a relevant open", "them all might be the most expedient way of handling this, but would", "criteria, in particular having solved a relevant open problem in the last 30", "(eg Galois definitely lived more than 30 years ago). While I'd consider the", "problem in the last 30 years and having initally been mistaken for a", "mistaken for a crank. There are lots of answers obviously not meeting the", "definitely lived more than 30 years ago). While I'd consider the 30 years", "30 years to be a bit restrictive (50 years would be better, imho),", "open problem in the last 30 years and having initally been mistaken for", "question meaningful. As such, can we do something about all those answers not", "researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular having solved a relevant open problem in", "a bit restrictive (50 years would be better, imho), overall the strict criteria", "strict criteria seem essentially to make this question meaningful. As such, can we", "to make this question meaningful. As such, can we do something about all", "something about all those answers not meeting them? A moderator deleting them all", "is asking whether there exists an example of researcher meeting particular criteria, in", "While I'd consider the 30 years to be a bit restrictive (50 years", "As such, can we do something about all those answers not meeting them?", "the strict criteria seem essentially to make this question meaningful. As such, can", "not meeting them? A moderator deleting them all might be the most expedient", "imho), overall the strict criteria seem essentially to make this question meaningful. As", "do something about all those answers not meeting them? A moderator deleting them", "A moderator deleting them all might be the most expedient way of handling", "be better, imho), overall the strict criteria seem essentially to make this question", "criteria seem essentially to make this question meaningful. As such, can we do", "are lots of answers obviously not meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived", "been mistaken for a crank. There are lots of answers obviously not meeting", "than 30 years ago). While I'd consider the 30 years to be a", "an example of researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular having solved a relevant", "to be a bit restrictive (50 years would be better, imho), overall the", "such, can we do something about all those answers not meeting them? A", "can we do something about all those answers not meeting them? A moderator", "meeting particular criteria, in particular having solved a relevant open problem in the", "lived more than 30 years ago). While I'd consider the 30 years to", "there exists an example of researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular having solved", "the 30 years to be a bit restrictive (50 years would be better,", "meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more than 30 years ago). While", "(50 years would be better, imho), overall the strict criteria seem essentially to", "solved a relevant open problem in the last 30 years and having initally", "those answers not meeting them? A moderator deleting them all might be the", "for a crank. There are lots of answers obviously not meeting the criteria", "[question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181336/is-there-a-single-example-of-an-outsider-considered-a-crank-publishing-a-groun) here is asking whether there exists an example of researcher meeting particular", "be the most expedient way of handling this, but would also be somewhat", "more than 30 years ago). While I'd consider the 30 years to be", "answers not meeting them? A moderator deleting them all might be the most", "the last 30 years and having initally been mistaken for a crank. There", "overall the strict criteria seem essentially to make this question meaningful. As such,", "the most expedient way of handling this, but would also be somewhat heavy-handed.", "particular criteria, in particular having solved a relevant open problem in the last", "this question meaningful. As such, can we do something about all those answers", "There are lots of answers obviously not meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely", "years to be a bit restrictive (50 years would be better, imho), overall", "deleting them all might be the most expedient way of handling this, but", "Galois definitely lived more than 30 years ago). While I'd consider the 30", "crank. There are lots of answers obviously not meeting the criteria (eg Galois", "years and having initally been mistaken for a crank. There are lots of", "exists an example of researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular having solved a", "make this question meaningful. As such, can we do something about all those", "asking whether there exists an example of researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular", "moderator deleting them all might be the most expedient way of handling this,", "whether there exists an example of researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular having", "all might be the most expedient way of handling this, but would also", "in particular having solved a relevant open problem in the last 30 years", "about all those answers not meeting them? A moderator deleting them all might", "having solved a relevant open problem in the last 30 years and having", "all those answers not meeting them? A moderator deleting them all might be", "particular having solved a relevant open problem in the last 30 years and", "a crank. There are lots of answers obviously not meeting the criteria (eg", "we do something about all those answers not meeting them? A moderator deleting", "ago). While I'd consider the 30 years to be a bit restrictive (50", "a relevant open problem in the last 30 years and having initally been", "not meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more than 30 years ago).", "might be the most expedient way of handling this, but would also be", "years would be better, imho), overall the strict criteria seem essentially to make", "of answers obviously not meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more than", "answers obviously not meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more than 30", "in the last 30 years and having initally been mistaken for a crank.", "of researcher meeting particular criteria, in particular having solved a relevant open problem", "obviously not meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more than 30 years", "bit restrictive (50 years would be better, imho), overall the strict criteria seem", "meeting them? A moderator deleting them all might be the most expedient way", "last 30 years and having initally been mistaken for a crank. There are", "lots of answers obviously not meeting the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more", "criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more than 30 years ago). While I'd consider", "better, imho), overall the strict criteria seem essentially to make this question meaningful.", "and having initally been mistaken for a crank. There are lots of answers", "having initally been mistaken for a crank. There are lots of answers obviously", "here is asking whether there exists an example of researcher meeting particular criteria,", "be a bit restrictive (50 years would be better, imho), overall the strict", "30 years ago). While I'd consider the 30 years to be a bit", "years ago). While I'd consider the 30 years to be a bit restrictive", "seem essentially to make this question meaningful. As such, can we do something", "would be better, imho), overall the strict criteria seem essentially to make this", "them? A moderator deleting them all might be the most expedient way of", "restrictive (50 years would be better, imho), overall the strict criteria seem essentially", "meaningful. As such, can we do something about all those answers not meeting", "essentially to make this question meaningful. As such, can we do something about", "This [question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181336/is-there-a-single-example-of-an-outsider-considered-a-crank-publishing-a-groun) here is asking whether there exists an example of researcher meeting", "the criteria (eg Galois definitely lived more than 30 years ago). While I'd" ]
[ "and for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according to our current policy on", "of considering, once and for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according to our", "that drawing software is definitely a software that \"solves a practical problem that", "considered on-topic, and I think that drawing software is definitely a software that", "is unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are", "the following reasons: 1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic,", "think that drawing software is definitely a software that \"solves a practical problem", "fact that questions of these kind pop up every now and then is", "these kind pop up every now and then is a sign that this", "software recommendations on-topic according to our current policy on software recommendation and reopen", "current policy on software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and the others that", "question as duplicate of a closed question which cannot be updated is useless.", "for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according to our current policy on software", "that \"solves a practical problem that is specific to academia or teaching\", and", "academia or teaching\", and the fact that questions of these kind pop up", "teaching\", and the fact that questions of these kind pop up every now", "every now and then is a sign that this is a problem felt", "2. Closing a question as duplicate of a closed question which cannot be", "as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I think that this", "is a sign that this is a problem felt by many academic users.", "is useless. My proposal is then that of considering, once and for all,", "I think that this state of affairs is unsatisfactory for the following reasons:", "many academic users. 2. Closing a question as duplicate of a closed question", "Questions about drawing software appear periodically on this site, and get either closed", "about drawing software appear periodically on this site, and get either closed as", "are now considered on-topic, and I think that drawing software is definitely a", "is definitely a software that \"solves a practical problem that is specific to", "according to our current policy on software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and", "policy on software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and the others that are", "kind pop up every now and then is a sign that this is", "closed. I think that this state of affairs is unsatisfactory for the following", "useless. My proposal is then that of considering, once and for all, drawing", "proposal is then that of considering, once and for all, drawing software recommendations", "[software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and I think that drawing software is", "software that \"solves a practical problem that is specific to academia or teaching\",", "types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and I think that drawing", "as duplicate of a closed question which cannot be updated is useless. My", "on software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and the others that are not", "of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I think that this state of", "by many academic users. 2. Closing a question as duplicate of a closed", "this is a problem felt by many academic users. 2. Closing a question", "the fact that questions of these kind pop up every now and then", "our current policy on software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and the others", "of a closed question which cannot be updated is useless. My proposal is", "specific to academia or teaching\", and the fact that questions of these kind", "a problem felt by many academic users. 2. Closing a question as duplicate", "of these kind pop up every now and then is a sign that", "which is again closed. I think that this state of affairs is unsatisfactory", "that questions of these kind pop up every now and then is a", "a practical problem that is specific to academia or teaching\", and the fact", "for the following reasons: 1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered", "Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and I think that", "then that of considering, once and for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according", "affairs is unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software)", "get either closed as off-topic or closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which", "on-topic, and I think that drawing software is definitely a software that \"solves", "or teaching\", and the fact that questions of these kind pop up every", "all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according to our current policy on software recommendation", "cannot be updated is useless. My proposal is then that of considering, once", "sign that this is a problem felt by many academic users. 2. Closing", "question which cannot be updated is useless. My proposal is then that of", "that is specific to academia or teaching\", and the fact that questions of", "recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and I think that drawing software is definitely", "is then that of considering, once and for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic", "and the fact that questions of these kind pop up every now and", "Closing a question as duplicate of a closed question which cannot be updated", "I think that drawing software is definitely a software that \"solves a practical", "software appear periodically on this site, and get either closed as off-topic or", "which cannot be updated is useless. My proposal is then that of considering,", "is again closed. I think that this state of affairs is unsatisfactory for", "is a problem felt by many academic users. 2. Closing a question as", "this state of affairs is unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1. Certain types", "off-topic or closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I", "that this state of affairs is unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1. Certain", "definitely a software that \"solves a practical problem that is specific to academia", "drawing software is definitely a software that \"solves a practical problem that is", "closed question which cannot be updated is useless. My proposal is then that", "duplicate of a closed question which cannot be updated is useless. My proposal", "problem felt by many academic users. 2. Closing a question as duplicate of", "of affairs is unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1. Certain types of [software", "a software that \"solves a practical problem that is specific to academia or", "reasons: 1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and I", "either closed as off-topic or closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is", "[this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I think that this state of affairs", "on this site, and get either closed as off-topic or closed as duplicate", "this site, and get either closed as off-topic or closed as duplicate of", "on-topic according to our current policy on software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095)", "now considered on-topic, and I think that drawing software is definitely a software", "of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and I think that drawing software", "periodically on this site, and get either closed as off-topic or closed as", "once and for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according to our current policy", "and then is a sign that this is a problem felt by many", "felt by many academic users. 2. Closing a question as duplicate of a", "is specific to academia or teaching\", and the fact that questions of these", "\"solves a practical problem that is specific to academia or teaching\", and the", "state of affairs is unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1. Certain types of", "appear periodically on this site, and get either closed as off-topic or closed", "questions of these kind pop up every now and then is a sign", "updated is useless. My proposal is then that of considering, once and for", "site, and get either closed as off-topic or closed as duplicate of [this", "a sign that this is a problem felt by many academic users. 2.", "following reasons: 1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and", "software is definitely a software that \"solves a practical problem that is specific", "as off-topic or closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed.", "closed as off-topic or closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again", "then is a sign that this is a problem felt by many academic", "to academia or teaching\", and the fact that questions of these kind pop", "software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and the others that are not duplicate.", "users. 2. Closing a question as duplicate of a closed question which cannot", "a closed question which cannot be updated is useless. My proposal is then", "again closed. I think that this state of affairs is unsatisfactory for the", "My proposal is then that of considering, once and for all, drawing software", "a question as duplicate of a closed question which cannot be updated is", "problem that is specific to academia or teaching\", and the fact that questions", "that of considering, once and for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according to", "unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now", "and I think that drawing software is definitely a software that \"solves a", "duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I think that this state", "academic users. 2. Closing a question as duplicate of a closed question which", "to our current policy on software recommendation and reopen [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095) and the", "pop up every now and then is a sign that this is a", "think that this state of affairs is unsatisfactory for the following reasons: 1.", "and get either closed as off-topic or closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095),", "drawing software recommendations on-topic according to our current policy on software recommendation and", "closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I think that", "recommendations on-topic according to our current policy on software recommendation and reopen [this", "considering, once and for all, drawing software recommendations on-topic according to our current", "drawing software appear periodically on this site, and get either closed as off-topic", "that this is a problem felt by many academic users. 2. Closing a", "one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I think that this state of affairs is", "be updated is useless. My proposal is then that of considering, once and", "or closed as duplicate of [this one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/1095), which is again closed. I think", "1. Certain types of [software recommendations](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4675/what-are-the-limits-of-shopping-questions-when-it-comes-to-software) are now considered on-topic, and I think", "up every now and then is a sign that this is a problem", "practical problem that is specific to academia or teaching\", and the fact that", "now and then is a sign that this is a problem felt by" ]
[ "of students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings of research departments, 4. academic", "research could be something like this: [What Query String Parameters can be used", "which I believe could also fall under the practical undertaking of research: [How", "I search for Academic Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand", "the risk of having it closed), a question on the practical undertaking of", "broad range of community members. I am not sure rules which necessitate the", "not also be sensible to allow questions directly related to the practical undertaking", "in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question is intentionally", "colleges, …), Given that the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it not", "with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one which has been closed, but", "question on the practical undertaking of research could be something like this: [What", "a broad range of community members. I am not sure rules which necessitate", "expectations of students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings of research departments, 4.", "like a very broad question that could help a broad range of community", "given it is so fundamental to academia? As an example (and at the", "having it closed), a question on the practical undertaking of research could be", "further example of one which has been closed, but which I believe could", "this stack exchange, it is suggested that questions covering these topics should be", "Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question is", "I understand the latter question is intentionally specific, but to me, that feels", "one which has been closed, but which I believe could also fall under", "am not sure rules which necessitate the closing of such questions are ideal", "of research: [How can I search for Academic Grants in the UK (Physics,", "that feels like a very broad question that could help a broad range", "suggested that questions covering these topics should be posted: 1. academic careers, 2.", "a very broad question that could help a broad range of community members.", "of one which has been closed, but which I believe could also fall", "question is intentionally specific, but to me, that feels like a very broad", "to academia? As an example (and at the risk of having it closed),", "Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question is intentionally specific, but to me, that", "of this stack exchange, it is suggested that questions covering these topics should", "exchange, it is suggested that questions covering these topics should be posted: 1.", "of research departments, 4. academic writing and publishing, 5. studying and teaching at", "intentionally specific, but to me, that feels like a very broad question that", "for Academic Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter", "of having it closed), a question on the practical undertaking of research could", "the practical undertaking of research could be something like this: [What Query String", "and expectations of students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings of research departments,", "4. academic writing and publishing, 5. studying and teaching at institutions of higher", "that questions covering these topics should be posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements", "publishing, 5. studying and teaching at institutions of higher education (universities, colleges, …),", "also fall under the practical undertaking of research: [How can I search for", "the practical undertaking of research: [How can I search for Academic Grants in", "allow questions directly related to the practical undertaking of research, given it is", "it is so fundamental to academia? As an example (and at the risk", "of research could be something like this: [What Query String Parameters can be", "been closed, but which I believe could also fall under the practical undertaking", "writing and publishing, 5. studying and teaching at institutions of higher education (universities,", "search for Academic Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the", "A further example of one which has been closed, but which I believe", "is so fundamental to academia? As an example (and at the risk of", "believe could also fall under the practical undertaking of research: [How can I", "question that could help a broad range of community members. I am not", "stack exchange, it is suggested that questions covering these topics should be posted:", "that could help a broad range of community members. I am not sure", "is called \"Academia\", would it not also be sensible to allow questions directly", "specific, but to me, that feels like a very broad question that could", "community members. I am not sure rules which necessitate the closing of such", "professors, 3. inner workings of research departments, 4. academic writing and publishing, 5.", "should be posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations of students, postdocs,", "that the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it not also be sensible", "teaching at institutions of higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given that the Stack", "2. requirements and expectations of students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings of", "so fundamental to academia? As an example (and at the risk of having", "Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it not also be sensible to allow", "institutions of higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given that the Stack Exchange is", "workings of research departments, 4. academic writing and publishing, 5. studying and teaching", "departments, 4. academic writing and publishing, 5. studying and teaching at institutions of", "undertaking of research, given it is so fundamental to academia? As an example", "research, given it is so fundamental to academia? As an example (and at", "I am not sure rules which necessitate the closing of such questions are", "rules which necessitate the closing of such questions are ideal for the community.", "the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it not also be sensible to", "range of community members. I am not sure rules which necessitate the closing", "Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one which has been closed, but which I", "like this: [What Query String Parameters can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A", "broad question that could help a broad range of community members. I am", "academic writing and publishing, 5. studying and teaching at institutions of higher education", "a question on the practical undertaking of research could be something like this:", "on the practical undertaking of research could be something like this: [What Query", "but which I believe could also fall under the practical undertaking of research:", "used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one which has been closed,", "something like this: [What Query String Parameters can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612)", "…), Given that the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it not also", "not sure rules which necessitate the closing of such questions are ideal for", "posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations of students, postdocs, or professors,", "\"Academia\", would it not also be sensible to allow questions directly related to", "be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one which has been", "covering these topics should be posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations", "could help a broad range of community members. I am not sure rules", "which has been closed, but which I believe could also fall under the", "(universities, colleges, …), Given that the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it", "String Parameters can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one", "be something like this: [What Query String Parameters can be used with Google", "but to me, that feels like a very broad question that could help", "related to the practical undertaking of research, given it is so fundamental to", "requirements and expectations of students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings of research", "(Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question is intentionally specific, but to", "topics should be posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations of students,", "of research, given it is so fundamental to academia? As an example (and", "called \"Academia\", would it not also be sensible to allow questions directly related", "the practical undertaking of research, given it is so fundamental to academia? As", "Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one which has been closed, but which", "is suggested that questions covering these topics should be posted: 1. academic careers,", "postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings of research departments, 4. academic writing and", "closed), a question on the practical undertaking of research could be something like", "at the risk of having it closed), a question on the practical undertaking", "and publishing, 5. studying and teaching at institutions of higher education (universities, colleges,", "closed, but which I believe could also fall under the practical undertaking of", "education (universities, colleges, …), Given that the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would", "of community members. I am not sure rules which necessitate the closing of", "3. inner workings of research departments, 4. academic writing and publishing, 5. studying", "can I search for Academic Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I", "undertaking of research: [How can I search for Academic Grants in the UK", "Parameters can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one which", "careers, 2. requirements and expectations of students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings", "inner workings of research departments, 4. academic writing and publishing, 5. studying and", "has been closed, but which I believe could also fall under the practical", "be posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations of students, postdocs, or", "Given that the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it not also be", "also be sensible to allow questions directly related to the practical undertaking of", "Query String Parameters can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of", "very broad question that could help a broad range of community members. I", "members. I am not sure rules which necessitate the closing of such questions", "of higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given that the Stack Exchange is called", "questions covering these topics should be posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements and", "academia? As an example (and at the risk of having it closed), a", "fall under the practical undertaking of research: [How can I search for Academic", "example of one which has been closed, but which I believe could also", "can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example of one which has", "I believe could also fall under the practical undertaking of research: [How can", "understand the latter question is intentionally specific, but to me, that feels like", "[How can I search for Academic Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566)", "the tour of this stack exchange, it is suggested that questions covering these", "to me, that feels like a very broad question that could help a", "to the practical undertaking of research, given it is so fundamental to academia?", "sure rules which necessitate the closing of such questions are ideal for the", "UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question is intentionally specific, but", "example (and at the risk of having it closed), a question on the", "research departments, 4. academic writing and publishing, 5. studying and teaching at institutions", "practical undertaking of research could be something like this: [What Query String Parameters", "fundamental to academia? As an example (and at the risk of having it", "these topics should be posted: 1. academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations of", "questions directly related to the practical undertaking of research, given it is so", "is intentionally specific, but to me, that feels like a very broad question", "would it not also be sensible to allow questions directly related to the", "higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given that the Stack Exchange is called \"Academia\",", "1. academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations of students, postdocs, or professors, 3.", "practical undertaking of research, given it is so fundamental to academia? As an", "Academic Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question", "feels like a very broad question that could help a broad range of", "help a broad range of community members. I am not sure rules which", "(and at the risk of having it closed), a question on the practical", "the UK (Physics, Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question is intentionally specific,", "[What Query String Parameters can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further example", "As an example (and at the risk of having it closed), a question", "5. studying and teaching at institutions of higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given", "undertaking of research could be something like this: [What Query String Parameters can", "directly related to the practical undertaking of research, given it is so fundamental", "me, that feels like a very broad question that could help a broad", "Exchange is called \"Academia\", would it not also be sensible to allow questions", "risk of having it closed), a question on the practical undertaking of research", "and teaching at institutions of higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given that the", "In the tour of this stack exchange, it is suggested that questions covering", "it is suggested that questions covering these topics should be posted: 1. academic", "Materials, Tech)?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181566/how-can-i-search-for-academic-grants-in-the-uk-physics-materials-tech?noredirect=1#comment487788_181566) I understand the latter question is intentionally specific, but to me,", "practical undertaking of research: [How can I search for Academic Grants in the", "students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner workings of research departments, 4. academic writing", "it not also be sensible to allow questions directly related to the practical", "could also fall under the practical undertaking of research: [How can I search", "tour of this stack exchange, it is suggested that questions covering these topics", "the latter question is intentionally specific, but to me, that feels like a", "under the practical undertaking of research: [How can I search for Academic Grants", "at institutions of higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given that the Stack Exchange", "be sensible to allow questions directly related to the practical undertaking of research,", "or professors, 3. inner workings of research departments, 4. academic writing and publishing,", "academic careers, 2. requirements and expectations of students, postdocs, or professors, 3. inner", "to allow questions directly related to the practical undertaking of research, given it", "an example (and at the risk of having it closed), a question on", "it closed), a question on the practical undertaking of research could be something", "could be something like this: [What Query String Parameters can be used with", "this: [What Query String Parameters can be used with Google Scholar?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181612/what-query-string-parameters-can-be-used-with-google-scholar?noredirect=1#comment487875_181612) A further", "sensible to allow questions directly related to the practical undertaking of research, given", "studying and teaching at institutions of higher education (universities, colleges, …), Given that", "latter question is intentionally specific, but to me, that feels like a very", "research: [How can I search for Academic Grants in the UK (Physics, Materials," ]
[ "site that can be answered with a few seconds spent with a search", "Google or Duck Duck Go. There is no obvious way to close them", "for voting to close such questions. The boilerplate comment for the close could", "engine such as Google or Duck Duck Go. There is no obvious way", "sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is probably more", "seconds spent with a search engine such as Google or Duck Duck Go.", "leaves the question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is probably more suitable as", "but leaves the question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is probably more suitable", "is an example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is", "the site that can be answered with a few seconds spent with a", "There is no obvious way to close them that I can see. Here", "example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but", "in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered.", "site-specific option for voting to close such questions. The boilerplate comment for the", "with a few seconds spent with a search engine such as Google or", "I can see. Here is an example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A", "[Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves", "answered with a few seconds spent with a search engine such as Google", "option for voting to close such questions. The boilerplate comment for the close", "spent with a search engine such as Google or Duck Duck Go. There", "close them that I can see. Here is an example: [Digital object identification", "obvious way to close them that I can see. Here is an example:", "A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered. An answer", "can see. Here is an example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment", "the question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is probably more suitable as a", "close such questions. The boilerplate comment for the close could say \"Use Google\"", "way to close them that I can see. Here is an example: [Digital", "as Google or Duck Duck Go. There is no obvious way to close", "be answered with a few seconds spent with a search engine such as", "a site-specific option for voting to close such questions. The boilerplate comment for", "unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is probably more suitable as a comment. Should", "is probably more suitable as a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific", "questions. The boilerplate comment for the close could say \"Use Google\" or similar.", "search engine such as Google or Duck Duck Go. There is no obvious", "is no obvious way to close them that I can see. Here is", "be a site-specific option for voting to close such questions. The boilerplate comment", "can be answered with a few seconds spent with a search engine such", "as a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific option for voting to", "Duck Go. There is no obvious way to close them that I can", "Google\" be a site-specific option for voting to close such questions. The boilerplate", "comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered. An answer \"Use", "identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the question", "a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific option for voting to close", "answer \"Use Google\" is probably more suitable as a comment. Should \"Use Google\"", "that I can see. Here is an example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368)", "such as Google or Duck Duck Go. There is no obvious way to", "questions on the site that can be answered with a few seconds spent", "with a search engine such as Google or Duck Duck Go. There is", "\"Use Google\" is probably more suitable as a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be", "Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is", "Go. There is no obvious way to close them that I can see.", "There are some questions on the site that can be answered with a", "question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is probably more suitable as a comment.", "to close them that I can see. Here is an example: [Digital object", "no obvious way to close them that I can see. Here is an", "see. Here is an example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use", "such questions. The boilerplate comment for the close could say \"Use Google\" or", "to close such questions. The boilerplate comment for the close could say \"Use", "Here is an example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\"", "a search engine such as Google or Duck Duck Go. There is no", "are some questions on the site that can be answered with a few", "arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered. An", "suitable as a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific option for voting", "probably more suitable as a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific option", "on the site that can be answered with a few seconds spent with", "an example: [Digital object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient,", "Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific option for voting to close such questions.", "Duck Duck Go. There is no obvious way to close them that I", "\"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\"", "\"Use Google\" be a site-specific option for voting to close such questions. The", "object identification in arxiv](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/182656/75368) A comment \"Use Google\" is sufficient, but leaves the", "voting to close such questions. The boilerplate comment for the close could say", "some questions on the site that can be answered with a few seconds", "comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific option for voting to close such", "that can be answered with a few seconds spent with a search engine", "a few seconds spent with a search engine such as Google or Duck", "An answer \"Use Google\" is probably more suitable as a comment. Should \"Use", "or Duck Duck Go. There is no obvious way to close them that", "is sufficient, but leaves the question unanswered. An answer \"Use Google\" is probably", "Google\" is probably more suitable as a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a", "them that I can see. Here is an example: [Digital object identification in", "few seconds spent with a search engine such as Google or Duck Duck", "more suitable as a comment. Should \"Use Google\" be a site-specific option for" ]
[ "or clarity\" and two votes for \"too broad.\" * I don't understand the", "other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion. Some good points on both sides, so", "out rather than making a binding decision here. Five users (myself included) have", "the complaints about details/clarity at all; the question seems perfectly clear to me.", "\"too broad\" complaint makes a bit more sense, since the question does also", "Five users (myself included) have now voted to reopen, so the question is", "looks like there were three votes for \"details or clarity\" and two votes", "points on both sides, so we'll let the normal voting process play out", "OP was wondering whether this explained why professors (who already have tenured, relatively", "but it remains eligible to be re-closed by voting in the usual way.", "tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so much time applying for and executing grants.", "is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing something -- other thoughts? Update:", "to close if the question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing", "votes for \"too broad.\" * I don't understand the complaints about details/clarity at", "so the question is open for now -- but it remains eligible to", "to me. * The \"too broad\" complaint makes a bit more sense, since", "complaint makes a bit more sense, since the question does also ask if", "normal voting process play out rather than making a binding decision here. Five", "can be resolved with a quick edit rather than closure. I propose we", "seems like OP was wondering whether this explained why professors (who already have", "be resolved with a quick edit rather than closure. I propose we reopen", "and executing grants. Why was this closed? It looks like there were three", "makes a bit more sense, since the question does also ask if the", "industry researchers. But this seems like a matter that can be resolved with", "* I don't understand the complaints about details/clarity at all; the question seems", "broad.\" * I don't understand the complaints about details/clarity at all; the question", "It looks like there were three votes for \"details or clarity\" and two", "for \"too broad.\" * I don't understand the complaints about details/clarity at all;", "would apply to industry researchers. But this seems like a matter that can", "clear to me. * The \"too broad\" complaint makes a bit more sense,", "with a quick edit rather than closure. I propose we reopen this question,", "three votes for \"details or clarity\" and two votes for \"too broad.\" ", "Update:* Appreciate the discussion. Some good points on both sides, so we'll let", "very straightforward to me: do professors get any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants?", "let the normal voting process play out rather than making a binding decision", "grants. Why was this closed? It looks like there were three votes for", "would encourage people to only vote to close if the question is truly", "matter that can be resolved with a quick edit rather than closure. I", "complaints about details/clarity at all; the question seems perfectly clear to me. ", "that can be resolved with a quick edit rather than closure. I propose", "maybe I am missing something -- other thoughts? Update:* Appreciate the discussion. Some", "-- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion. Some good points on both sides,", "Why was this closed? It looks like there were three votes for \"details", "voted to reopen, so the question is open for now -- but it", "I don't understand the complaints about details/clarity at all; the question seems perfectly", "closure. I propose we reopen this question, and moving forward, I would encourage", "well-paid positions) spent so much time applying for and executing grants. Why was", "was wondering whether this explained why professors (who already have tenured, relatively well-paid", "bit more sense, since the question does also ask if the same logic", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182935) seems very straightforward to me: do professors get any financial \"rewards\" for", "also ask if the same logic would apply to industry researchers. But this", "a binding decision here. Five users (myself included) have now voted to reopen,", "Some good points on both sides, so we'll let the normal voting process", "have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so much time applying for and executing", "this closed? It looks like there were three votes for \"details or clarity\"", "same logic would apply to industry researchers. But this seems like a matter", "But this seems like a matter that can be resolved with a quick", "encourage people to only vote to close if the question is truly unsalvageable.", "propose we reopen this question, and moving forward, I would encourage people to", "the question seems perfectly clear to me. * The \"too broad\" complaint makes", "was this closed? It looks like there were three votes for \"details or", "logic would apply to industry researchers. But this seems like a matter that", "forward, I would encourage people to only vote to close if the question", "explained why professors (who already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so much", "for \"details or clarity\" and two votes for \"too broad.\" * I don't", "two votes for \"too broad.\" * I don't understand the complaints about details/clarity", "have now voted to reopen, so the question is open for now --", "relatively well-paid positions) spent so much time applying for and executing grants. Why", "researchers. But this seems like a matter that can be resolved with a", "open for now -- but it remains eligible to be re-closed by voting", "already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so much time applying for and", "a bit more sense, since the question does also ask if the same", "to me: do professors get any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems", "financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems like OP was wondering whether this", "close if the question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing something", "(who already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so much time applying for", "does also ask if the same logic would apply to industry researchers. But", "if the same logic would apply to industry researchers. But this seems like", "broad\" complaint makes a bit more sense, since the question does also ask", "we reopen this question, and moving forward, I would encourage people to only", "* The \"too broad\" complaint makes a bit more sense, since the question", "details/clarity at all; the question seems perfectly clear to me. * The \"too", "voting process play out rather than making a binding decision here. Five users", "and two votes for \"too broad.\" * I don't understand the complaints about", "unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing something -- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the", "than closure. I propose we reopen this question, and moving forward, I would", "time applying for and executing grants. Why was this closed? It looks like", "users (myself included) have now voted to reopen, so the question is open", "the question does also ask if the same logic would apply to industry", "sense, since the question does also ask if the same logic would apply", "much time applying for and executing grants. Why was this closed? It looks", "this explained why professors (who already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so", "were three votes for \"details or clarity\" and two votes for \"too broad.\"", "more sense, since the question does also ask if the same logic would", "Appreciate the discussion. Some good points on both sides, so we'll let the", "play out rather than making a binding decision here. Five users (myself included)", "me: do professors get any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems like", "so much time applying for and executing grants. Why was this closed? It", "and moving forward, I would encourage people to only vote to close if", "seems perfectly clear to me. * The \"too broad\" complaint makes a bit", "something -- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion. Some good points on both", "the discussion. Some good points on both sides, so we'll let the normal", "why professors (who already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so much time", "[This question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182935) seems very straightforward to me: do professors get any financial \"rewards\"", "clarity\" and two votes for \"too broad.\" * I don't understand the complaints", "than making a binding decision here. Five users (myself included) have now voted", "both sides, so we'll let the normal voting process play out rather than", "closed? It looks like there were three votes for \"details or clarity\" and", "about details/clarity at all; the question seems perfectly clear to me. * The", "included) have now voted to reopen, so the question is open for now", "now voted to reopen, so the question is open for now -- but", "It seems like OP was wondering whether this explained why professors (who already", "like OP was wondering whether this explained why professors (who already have tenured,", "applying for and executing grants. Why was this closed? It looks like there", "process play out rather than making a binding decision here. Five users (myself", "the question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing something -- other", "whether this explained why professors (who already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent", "question does also ask if the same logic would apply to industry researchers.", "question is open for now -- but it remains eligible to be re-closed", "do professors get any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems like OP", "thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion. Some good points on both sides, so we'll", "since the question does also ask if the same logic would apply to", "votes for \"details or clarity\" and two votes for \"too broad.\" * I", "a quick edit rather than closure. I propose we reopen this question, and", "-- but it remains eligible to be re-closed by voting in the usual", "missing something -- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion. Some good points on", "get any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems like OP was wondering", "the same logic would apply to industry researchers. But this seems like a", "if the question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing something --", "quick edit rather than closure. I propose we reopen this question, and moving", "only vote to close if the question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I", "is open for now -- but it remains eligible to be re-closed by", "reopen this question, and moving forward, I would encourage people to only vote", "reopen, so the question is open for now -- but it remains eligible", "rather than closure. I propose we reopen this question, and moving forward, I", "the question is open for now -- but it remains eligible to be", "perfectly clear to me. * The \"too broad\" complaint makes a bit more", "so we'll let the normal voting process play out rather than making a", "professors (who already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions) spent so much time applying", "any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems like OP was wondering whether", "don't understand the complaints about details/clarity at all; the question seems perfectly clear", "vote to close if the question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am", "I am missing something -- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion. Some good", "edit rather than closure. I propose we reopen this question, and moving forward,", "good points on both sides, so we'll let the normal voting process play", "question seems perfectly clear to me. * The \"too broad\" complaint makes a", "on both sides, so we'll let the normal voting process play out rather", "executing grants. Why was this closed? It looks like there were three votes", "for now -- but it remains eligible to be re-closed by voting in", "to industry researchers. But this seems like a matter that can be resolved", "here. Five users (myself included) have now voted to reopen, so the question", "question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing something -- other thoughts?", "the normal voting process play out rather than making a binding decision here.", "I propose we reopen this question, and moving forward, I would encourage people", "to reopen, so the question is open for now -- but it remains", "wondering whether this explained why professors (who already have tenured, relatively well-paid positions)", "discussion. Some good points on both sides, so we'll let the normal voting", "straightforward to me: do professors get any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It", "to only vote to close if the question is truly unsalvageable. But maybe", "we'll let the normal voting process play out rather than making a binding", "this seems like a matter that can be resolved with a quick edit", "a matter that can be resolved with a quick edit rather than closure.", "question, and moving forward, I would encourage people to only vote to close", "sides, so we'll let the normal voting process play out rather than making", "seems like a matter that can be resolved with a quick edit rather", "moving forward, I would encourage people to only vote to close if the", "\"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems like OP was wondering whether this explained", "I would encourage people to only vote to close if the question is", "am missing something -- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion. Some good points", "\"too broad.\" * I don't understand the complaints about details/clarity at all; the", "this question, and moving forward, I would encourage people to only vote to", "like there were three votes for \"details or clarity\" and two votes for", "binding decision here. Five users (myself included) have now voted to reopen, so", "positions) spent so much time applying for and executing grants. Why was this", "people to only vote to close if the question is truly unsalvageable. But", "\"details or clarity\" and two votes for \"too broad.\" * I don't understand", "winning grants? It seems like OP was wondering whether this explained why professors", "decision here. Five users (myself included) have now voted to reopen, so the", "apply to industry researchers. But this seems like a matter that can be", "But maybe I am missing something -- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate the discussion.", "(myself included) have now voted to reopen, so the question is open for", "me. * The \"too broad\" complaint makes a bit more sense, since the", "for winning grants? It seems like OP was wondering whether this explained why", "at all; the question seems perfectly clear to me. * The \"too broad\"", "ask if the same logic would apply to industry researchers. But this seems", "rather than making a binding decision here. Five users (myself included) have now", "professors get any financial \"rewards\" for winning grants? It seems like OP was", "truly unsalvageable. But maybe I am missing something -- other thoughts? Update: Appreciate", "making a binding decision here. Five users (myself included) have now voted to", "spent so much time applying for and executing grants. Why was this closed?", "understand the complaints about details/clarity at all; the question seems perfectly clear to", "seems very straightforward to me: do professors get any financial \"rewards\" for winning", "resolved with a quick edit rather than closure. I propose we reopen this", "there were three votes for \"details or clarity\" and two votes for \"too", "now -- but it remains eligible to be re-closed by voting in the", "grants? It seems like OP was wondering whether this explained why professors (who", "The \"too broad\" complaint makes a bit more sense, since the question does", "all; the question seems perfectly clear to me. * The \"too broad\" complaint", "like a matter that can be resolved with a quick edit rather than", "for and executing grants. Why was this closed? It looks like there were" ]
[ "a regular close vote of one sort or another execute on the second", "execute on the second question and that would've been closer to the spirit", "that differentiates these questions substantially enough that they require such different strategies? I", "mods need to be superhuman, but I really do think things are frequently", "those that weren't consulted) and on keeping the post open. I'm not really", "superhuman, but I really do think things are frequently handled inconsistently. In January,", "we could have just let a regular close vote of one sort or", "on keeping the post open. I'm not really happy about how it was", "keeping the post open. I'm not really happy about how it was handled,", "that they require such different strategies? I feel like we could have just", "that the mods need to be superhuman, but I really do think things", "but at least that is one policy. Today, we've had the controversial post", "had this question go through: [Examples of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.)", "could have just let a regular close vote of one sort or another", "post open. I'm not really happy about how it was handled, but at", "In January, we had this question go through: [Examples of successful push-backs against", "the original poster's edit strategy. Is there something I'm missing that differentiates these", "something I'm missing that differentiates these questions substantially enough that they require such", "I'm not really happy about how it was handled, but at least that", "a 24 hour lock because a moderator was unhappy with the original poster's", "one sort or another execute on the second question and that would've been", "conducted. That's not to say that the mods need to be superhuman, but", "response was to issue a 24 hour lock because a moderator was unhappy", "through, where the response was to issue a 24 hour lock because a", "that is one policy. Today, we've had the controversial post [Was it appropriate", "post, and the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting comments (even those", "question and that would've been closer to the spirit of how the first", "consulted) and on keeping the post open. I'm not really happy about how", "really do think things are frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we had this", "deleting comments (even those that weren't consulted) and on keeping the post open.", "post [Was it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response", "vote of one sort or another execute on the second question and that", "not to say that the mods need to be superhuman, but I really", "come through, where the response was to issue a 24 hour lock because", "where the response was to issue a 24 hour lock because a moderator", "strategies? I feel like we could have just let a regular close vote", "just let a regular close vote of one sort or another execute on", "was handled, but at least that is one policy. Today, we've had the", "on our controversial questions is conducted. That's not to say that the mods", "because a moderator was unhappy with the original poster's edit strategy. Is there", "and that would've been closer to the spirit of how the first was", "this question go through: [Examples of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives", "to say that the mods need to be superhuman, but I really do", "controversial post [Was it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the", "of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously", "our controversial questions is conducted. That's not to say that the mods need", "second question and that would've been closer to the spirit of how the", "Today, we've had the controversial post [Was it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1)", "different strategies? I feel like we could have just let a regular close", "That's not to say that the mods need to be superhuman, but I", "was unhappy with the original poster's edit strategy. Is there something I'm missing", "have just let a regular close vote of one sort or another execute", "on deleting comments (even those that weren't consulted) and on keeping the post", "been somewhat confused by how the moderation on our controversial questions is conducted.", "24 hour lock because a moderator was unhappy with the original poster's edit", "is conducted. That's not to say that the mods need to be superhuman,", "inconsistently. In January, we had this question go through: [Examples of successful push-backs", "with the original poster's edit strategy. Is there something I'm missing that differentiates", "they require such different strategies? I feel like we could have just let", "a moderator was unhappy with the original poster's edit strategy. Is there something", "etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial post, and the moderation", "aggressively focused on deleting comments (even those that weren't consulted) and on keeping", "the post open. I'm not really happy about how it was handled, but", "hour lock because a moderator was unhappy with the original poster's edit strategy.", "and the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting comments (even those that", "there something I'm missing that differentiates these questions substantially enough that they require", "January, we had this question go through: [Examples of successful push-backs against DEI", "through: [Examples of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This", "against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial post,", "policy. Today, we've had the controversial post [Was it appropriate to discuss the", "in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial post, and the moderation philosophy was", "edit strategy. Is there something I'm missing that differentiates these questions substantially enough", "that weren't consulted) and on keeping the post open. I'm not really happy", "least that is one policy. Today, we've had the controversial post [Was it", "things are frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we had this question go through:", "on the second question and that would've been closer to the spirit of", "Is there something I'm missing that differentiates these questions substantially enough that they", "by how the moderation on our controversial questions is conducted. That's not to", "the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting comments (even those that weren't", "differentiates these questions substantially enough that they require such different strategies? I feel", "such different strategies? I feel like we could have just let a regular", "[Examples of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was", "frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we had this question go through: [Examples of", "how it was handled, but at least that is one policy. Today, we've", "was to issue a 24 hour lock because a moderator was unhappy with", "open. I'm not really happy about how it was handled, but at least", "we've had the controversial post [Was it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come", "focused on deleting comments (even those that weren't consulted) and on keeping the", "one policy. Today, we've had the controversial post [Was it appropriate to discuss", "it was handled, but at least that is one policy. Today, we've had", "to issue a 24 hour lock because a moderator was unhappy with the", "(even those that weren't consulted) and on keeping the post open. I'm not", "happy about how it was handled, but at least that is one policy.", "another execute on the second question and that would've been closer to the", "original poster's edit strategy. Is there something I'm missing that differentiates these questions", "like we could have just let a regular close vote of one sort", "philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting comments (even those that weren't consulted) and", "I really do think things are frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we had", "require such different strategies? I feel like we could have just let a", "need to be superhuman, but I really do think things are frequently handled", "push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial", "go through: [Examples of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a)", "question go through: [Examples of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in", "DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial post, and", "let a regular close vote of one sort or another execute on the", "but I really do think things are frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we", "not really happy about how it was handled, but at least that is", "moderator was unhappy with the original poster's edit strategy. Is there something I'm", "was obviously a controversial post, and the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on", "obviously a controversial post, and the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting", "the mods need to be superhuman, but I really do think things are", "controversial post, and the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting comments (even", "appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response was to issue", "and on keeping the post open. I'm not really happy about how it", "[Was it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response was", "these questions substantially enough that they require such different strategies? I feel like", "controversial questions is conducted. That's not to say that the mods need to", "questions is conducted. That's not to say that the mods need to be", "had the controversial post [Was it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through,", "I've been somewhat confused by how the moderation on our controversial questions is", "unhappy with the original poster's edit strategy. Is there something I'm missing that", "regular close vote of one sort or another execute on the second question", "confused by how the moderation on our controversial questions is conducted. That's not", "(diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial post, and the", "a controversial post, and the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting comments", "or another execute on the second question and that would've been closer to", "the second question and that would've been closer to the spirit of how", "the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response was to issue a 24 hour", "the moderation on our controversial questions is conducted. That's not to say that", "successful push-backs against DEI (diversity, etc.) initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a", "say that the mods need to be superhuman, but I really do think", "to be superhuman, but I really do think things are frequently handled inconsistently.", "somewhat confused by how the moderation on our controversial questions is conducted. That's", "are frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we had this question go through: [Examples", "comments (even those that weren't consulted) and on keeping the post open. I'm", "about how it was handled, but at least that is one policy. Today,", "issue a 24 hour lock because a moderator was unhappy with the original", "handled inconsistently. In January, we had this question go through: [Examples of successful", "initiatives in academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial post, and the moderation philosophy", "lock because a moderator was unhappy with the original poster's edit strategy. Is", "strategy. Is there something I'm missing that differentiates these questions substantially enough that", "substantially enough that they require such different strategies? I feel like we could", "close vote of one sort or another execute on the second question and", "was aggressively focused on deleting comments (even those that weren't consulted) and on", "we had this question go through: [Examples of successful push-backs against DEI (diversity,", "really happy about how it was handled, but at least that is one", "handled, but at least that is one policy. Today, we've had the controversial", "questions substantially enough that they require such different strategies? I feel like we", "moderation philosophy was aggressively focused on deleting comments (even those that weren't consulted)", "of one sort or another execute on the second question and that would've", "sort or another execute on the second question and that would've been closer", "feel like we could have just let a regular close vote of one", "do think things are frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we had this question", "be superhuman, but I really do think things are frequently handled inconsistently. In", "This was obviously a controversial post, and the moderation philosophy was aggressively focused", "poster's edit strategy. Is there something I'm missing that differentiates these questions substantially", "think things are frequently handled inconsistently. In January, we had this question go", "weren't consulted) and on keeping the post open. I'm not really happy about", "reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response was to issue a 24 hour lock", "enough that they require such different strategies? I feel like we could have", "academia?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/181132/examples-of-successful-push-backs-against-dei-diversity-etc-initiatives-in-a) This was obviously a controversial post, and the moderation philosophy was aggressively", "discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response was to issue a 24", "how the moderation on our controversial questions is conducted. That's not to say", "I'm missing that differentiates these questions substantially enough that they require such different", "missing that differentiates these questions substantially enough that they require such different strategies?", "it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response was to", "at least that is one policy. Today, we've had the controversial post [Was", "I feel like we could have just let a regular close vote of", "that would've been closer to the spirit of how the first was handled.", "to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where the response was to issue a", "the response was to issue a 24 hour lock because a moderator was", "moderation on our controversial questions is conducted. That's not to say that the", "the controversial post [Was it appropriate to discuss the reply-all?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/185707/was-it-appropriate-to-discuss-the-reply-all?noredirect=1) come through, where", "is one policy. Today, we've had the controversial post [Was it appropriate to" ]
[ "down votes. It is not at all a duplicate of another. And I", "on the context of peer-reviewing or as in the general case. I want", "same as in programming or others if I don't know about the review", "community-specific reason is apt because I don't know about the notation used by", "How safe it is to say that the interpretation of '3+' is the", "1 community-specific reason) and 2 down votes. It is not at all a", "to keep 'n+'. > But if the editor sends a review request to", "information regarding it? How safe it is to say that the interpretation of", "the question because it is useful to me. I am just curious to", "academia alone. How can I know whether it is trivial or not if", "is to say that the interpretation of '3+' is the same as in", "notation used by Elsevier. I don't know whether I need to interpret it", "provided an exact answer till now. Then how can I convince myself that", "any question on our main site. No one provided an exact answer till", "Then how can I convince myself that it is a trivial question or", "not aware whether the community-specific reason is apt because I don't know about", "accept and the remaining can > be extra or optional! > > >", "to a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then what is the need to", "a trivial question and not related to academia alone. How can I know", "others if I don't know about the review requests etc., You can read", "of > reviewers, then what is the need to tell '>=n' instead of", "on our main site. The main objections from users I found are 1.", "reason is apt because I don't know about the notation used by Elsevier.", "and didn't find explicit information regarding it? How safe it is to say", "invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific", "I convince myself that it is a trivial question or of low standard?", "know about the review requests etc., You can read one of my comments", "comments > > If we are uncertain about the number, it is recommended", "need to interpret it based on the context of peer-reviewing or as in", "because it is useful to me. I am just curious to understand. And", "to say that the interpretation of '3+' is the same as in programming", "a necessary criterion to ask any question on our main site. No one", "an exact answer till now. Then how can I convince myself that it", "not if I am not in to review process and didn't find explicit", "site. No one provided an exact answer till now. Then how can I", "main objections from users I found are 1. It is a trivial question", "instead of the exact > number? So, there might be some information like", "reason) and 2 down votes. It is not at all a duplicate of", "all a duplicate of another. And I am not aware whether the community-specific", "2. It is not useful in any way I did not ask the", "another. And I am not aware whether the community-specific reason is apt because", "recommended to keep 'n+'. > But if the editor sends a review request", "in any way I did not ask the question because it is useful", "But if the editor sends a review request to a particular(fixed) number of", "I don't know whether I need to interpret it based on the context", "I don't know about the review requests etc., You can read one of", "be some information like the review process > will be started if at", "that the interpretation of '3+' is the same as in programming or others", "want to know what are the potential issues with this question to refrain", "If we are uncertain about the number, it is recommended to keep 'n+'.", "I need to interpret it based on the context of peer-reviewing or as", "> > > 2. It is not useful in any way I did", "review requests etc., You can read one of my comments > > If", "can be understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close", "my comments > > If we are uncertain about the number, it is", "question on our main site. No one provided an exact answer till now.", "requests etc., You can read one of my comments > > If we", "to academia alone. How can I know whether it is trivial or not", "is useful to me. I am just curious to understand. And I don't", "and not related to academia alone. How can I know whether it is", "it is to say that the interpretation of '3+' is the same as", "programming or others if I don't know about the review requests etc., You", "> > 2. It is not useful in any way I did not", "not at all a duplicate of another. And I am not aware whether", "to review process and didn't find explicit information regarding it? How safe it", "don't know about the review requests etc., You can read one of my", "understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close votes (2", "votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and 2 down votes. It is", "used by Elsevier. I don't know whether I need to interpret it based", "at all a duplicate of another. And I am not aware whether the", "the notation used by Elsevier. I don't know whether I need to interpret", "extra or optional! > > > 2. It is not useful in any", "editor sends a review request to a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then", "> be extra or optional! > > > 2. It is not useful", "objections from users I found are 1. It is a trivial question and", "this question to refrain before posting questions on our main site. The main", "and 2 down votes. It is not at all a duplicate of another.", "posting questions on our main site. The main objections from users I found", "I am just curious to understand. And I don't think usability is a", "request to a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then what is the need", "related to academia alone. How can I know whether it is trivial or", "to know what are the potential issues with this question to refrain before", "criterion to ask any question on our main site. No one provided an", "our main site. The main objections from users I found are 1. It", "am not in to review process and didn't find explicit information regarding it?", "useful to me. I am just curious to understand. And I don't think", "'n' reviewers accept and the remaining can > be extra or optional! >", "optional! > > > 2. It is not useful in any way I", "it is trivial or not if I am not in to review process", "necessary criterion to ask any question on our main site. No one provided", "least 'n' reviewers accept and the remaining can > be extra or optional!", "started if at least 'n' reviewers accept and the remaining can > be", "Please read the following question [What all can be understood from more 'Review", "with this question to refrain before posting questions on our main site. The", "users I found are 1. It is a trivial question and not related", "know whether it is trivial or not if I am not in to", "So, there might be some information like the review process > will be", "etc., You can read one of my comments > > If we are", "a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then what is the need to tell", "of the exact > number? So, there might be some information like the", "number, it is recommended to keep 'n+'. > But if the editor sends", "peer-reviewing or as in the general case. I want to know what are", "I don't think usability is a necessary criterion to ask any question on", "sends a review request to a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then what", "main site. No one provided an exact answer till now. Then how can", "am not aware whether the community-specific reason is apt because I don't know", "It is not useful in any way I did not ask the question", "don't know whether I need to interpret it based on the context of", "don't know about the notation used by Elsevier. I don't know whether I", "tell '>=n' instead of the exact > number? So, there might be some", "question [What all can be understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question", "our main site. No one provided an exact answer till now. Then how", "might be some information like the review process > will be started if", "sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason)", "now. Then how can I convince myself that it is a trivial question", "'3+' is the same as in programming or others if I don't know", "if the editor sends a review request to a particular(fixed) number of >", "what is the need to tell '>=n' instead of the exact > number?", "of '3+' is the same as in programming or others if I don't", "whether I need to interpret it based on the context of peer-reviewing or", "interpret it based on the context of peer-reviewing or as in the general", "then what is the need to tell '>=n' instead of the exact >", "don't think usability is a necessary criterion to ask any question on our", "> number? So, there might be some information like the review process >", "keep 'n+'. > But if the editor sends a review request to a", "I am not aware whether the community-specific reason is apt because I don't", "not related to academia alone. How can I know whether it is trivial", "about the review requests etc., You can read one of my comments >", "in to review process and didn't find explicit information regarding it? How safe", "we are uncertain about the number, it is recommended to keep 'n+'. >", "whether it is trivial or not if I am not in to review", "How can I know whether it is trivial or not if I am", "remaining can > be extra or optional! > > > 2. It is", "it? How safe it is to say that the interpretation of '3+' is", "from users I found are 1. It is a trivial question and not", "ask any question on our main site. No one provided an exact answer", "can > be extra or optional! > > > 2. It is not", "> If we are uncertain about the number, it is recommended to keep", "The question received 3 close votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and", "about the number, it is recommended to keep 'n+'. > But if the", "> But if the editor sends a review request to a particular(fixed) number", "is trivial or not if I am not in to review process and", "the review requests etc., You can read one of my comments > >", "to refrain before posting questions on our main site. The main objections from", "more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close votes (2 duplicate &", "answer till now. Then how can I convince myself that it is a", "general case. I want to know what are the potential issues with this", "I am not in to review process and didn't find explicit information regarding", "close votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and 2 down votes. It", "explicit information regarding it? How safe it is to say that the interpretation", "and the remaining can > be extra or optional! > > > 2.", "ask the question because it is useful to me. I am just curious", "the review process > will be started if at least 'n' reviewers accept", "the editor sends a review request to a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers,", "if at least 'n' reviewers accept and the remaining can > be extra", "It is not at all a duplicate of another. And I am not", "> 2. It is not useful in any way I did not ask", "read the following question [What all can be understood from more 'Review invitations", "question to refrain before posting questions on our main site. The main objections", "by Elsevier. I don't know whether I need to interpret it based on", "just curious to understand. And I don't think usability is a necessary criterion", "way I did not ask the question because it is useful to me.", "No one provided an exact answer till now. Then how can I convince", "And I don't think usability is a necessary criterion to ask any question", "it is useful to me. I am just curious to understand. And I", "> reviewers, then what is the need to tell '>=n' instead of the", "the number, it is recommended to keep 'n+'. > But if the editor", "didn't find explicit information regarding it? How safe it is to say that", "review process and didn't find explicit information regarding it? How safe it is", "reviewers accept and the remaining can > be extra or optional! > >", "to interpret it based on the context of peer-reviewing or as in the", "the following question [What all can be understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3)", "the potential issues with this question to refrain before posting questions on our", "potential issues with this question to refrain before posting questions on our main", "I want to know what are the potential issues with this question to", "as in the general case. I want to know what are the potential", "it is recommended to keep 'n+'. > But if the editor sends a", "is a trivial question and not related to academia alone. How can I", "'n+'. > But if the editor sends a review request to a particular(fixed)", "And I am not aware whether the community-specific reason is apt because I", "process > will be started if at least 'n' reviewers accept and the", "did not ask the question because it is useful to me. I am", "it based on the context of peer-reviewing or as in the general case.", "duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and 2 down votes. It is not at", "duplicate of another. And I am not aware whether the community-specific reason is", "of my comments > > If we are uncertain about the number, it", "to me. I am just curious to understand. And I don't think usability", "the need to tell '>=n' instead of the exact > number? So, there", "exact answer till now. Then how can I convince myself that it is", "to tell '>=n' instead of the exact > number? So, there might be", "reviewers, then what is the need to tell '>=n' instead of the exact", "the interpretation of '3+' is the same as in programming or others if", "received 3 close votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and 2 down", "2 down votes. It is not at all a duplicate of another. And", "because I don't know about the notation used by Elsevier. I don't know", "main site. The main objections from users I found are 1. It is", "be understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close votes", "I don't know about the notation used by Elsevier. I don't know whether", "'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close votes (2 duplicate & 1", "can I convince myself that it is a trivial question or of low", "will be started if at least 'n' reviewers accept and the remaining can", "think usability is a necessary criterion to ask any question on our main", "exact > number? So, there might be some information like the review process", "if I am not in to review process and didn't find explicit information", "number of > reviewers, then what is the need to tell '>=n' instead", "the remaining can > be extra or optional! > > > 2. It", "or optional! > > > 2. It is not useful in any way", "usability is a necessary criterion to ask any question on our main site.", "or others if I don't know about the review requests etc., You can", "as in programming or others if I don't know about the review requests", "one provided an exact answer till now. Then how can I convince myself", "Elsevier. I don't know whether I need to interpret it based on the", "refrain before posting questions on our main site. The main objections from users", "before posting questions on our main site. The main objections from users I", "the exact > number? So, there might be some information like the review", "a review request to a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then what is", "information like the review process > will be started if at least 'n'", "to ask any question on our main site. No one provided an exact", "> > If we are uncertain about the number, it is recommended to", "till now. Then how can I convince myself that it is a trivial", "(2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and 2 down votes. It is not", "is apt because I don't know about the notation used by Elsevier. I", "is not at all a duplicate of another. And I am not aware", "3 close votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and 2 down votes.", "the community-specific reason is apt because I don't know about the notation used", "are 1. It is a trivial question and not related to academia alone.", "not in to review process and didn't find explicit information regarding it? How", "in programming or others if I don't know about the review requests etc.,", "whether the community-specific reason is apt because I don't know about the notation", "& 1 community-specific reason) and 2 down votes. It is not at all", "following question [What all can be understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The", "not ask the question because it is useful to me. I am just", "It is a trivial question and not related to academia alone. How can", "some information like the review process > will be started if at least", "the general case. I want to know what are the potential issues with", "know whether I need to interpret it based on the context of peer-reviewing", "interpretation of '3+' is the same as in programming or others if I", "trivial or not if I am not in to review process and didn't", "The main objections from users I found are 1. It is a trivial", "based on the context of peer-reviewing or as in the general case. I", "regarding it? How safe it is to say that the interpretation of '3+'", "I know whether it is trivial or not if I am not in", "need to tell '>=n' instead of the exact > number? So, there might", "understand. And I don't think usability is a necessary criterion to ask any", "question and not related to academia alone. How can I know whether it", "all can be understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3", "there might be some information like the review process > will be started", "to understand. And I don't think usability is a necessary criterion to ask", "site. The main objections from users I found are 1. It is a", "am just curious to understand. And I don't think usability is a necessary", "in the general case. I want to know what are the potential issues", "particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then what is the need to tell '>=n'", "is not useful in any way I did not ask the question because", "say that the interpretation of '3+' is the same as in programming or", "on our main site. No one provided an exact answer till now. Then", "or as in the general case. I want to know what are the", "1. It is a trivial question and not related to academia alone. How", "'>=n' instead of the exact > number? So, there might be some information", "curious to understand. And I don't think usability is a necessary criterion to", "process and didn't find explicit information regarding it? How safe it is to", "is the need to tell '>=n' instead of the exact > number? So,", "review process > will be started if at least 'n' reviewers accept and", "alone. How can I know whether it is trivial or not if I", "trivial question and not related to academia alone. How can I know whether", "I found are 1. It is a trivial question and not related to", "You can read one of my comments > > If we are uncertain", "are the potential issues with this question to refrain before posting questions on", "number? So, there might be some information like the review process > will", "useful in any way I did not ask the question because it is", "aware whether the community-specific reason is apt because I don't know about the", "at least 'n' reviewers accept and the remaining can > be extra or", "case. I want to know what are the potential issues with this question", "safe it is to say that the interpretation of '3+' is the same", "the same as in programming or others if I don't know about the", "uncertain about the number, it is recommended to keep 'n+'. > But if", "like the review process > will be started if at least 'n' reviewers", "from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received 3 close votes (2 duplicate", "be extra or optional! > > > 2. It is not useful in", "is a necessary criterion to ask any question on our main site. No", "of another. And I am not aware whether the community-specific reason is apt", "> will be started if at least 'n' reviewers accept and the remaining", "not useful in any way I did not ask the question because it", "found are 1. It is a trivial question and not related to academia", "the context of peer-reviewing or as in the general case. I want to", "I did not ask the question because it is useful to me. I", "can I know whether it is trivial or not if I am not", "know what are the potential issues with this question to refrain before posting", "votes. It is not at all a duplicate of another. And I am", "questions on our main site. The main objections from users I found are", "are uncertain about the number, it is recommended to keep 'n+'. > But", "context of peer-reviewing or as in the general case. I want to know", "issues with this question to refrain before posting questions on our main site.", "review request to a particular(fixed) number of > reviewers, then what is the", "community-specific reason) and 2 down votes. It is not at all a duplicate", "is the same as in programming or others if I don't know about", "is recommended to keep 'n+'. > But if the editor sends a review", "question received 3 close votes (2 duplicate & 1 community-specific reason) and 2", "of peer-reviewing or as in the general case. I want to know what", "any way I did not ask the question because it is useful to", "[What all can be understood from more 'Review invitations sent'?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186587/what-all-can-be-understood-from-review-invitations-sent-3) The question received", "question because it is useful to me. I am just curious to understand.", "read one of my comments > > If we are uncertain about the", "how can I convince myself that it is a trivial question or of", "know about the notation used by Elsevier. I don't know whether I need", "if I don't know about the review requests etc., You can read one", "me. I am just curious to understand. And I don't think usability is", "or not if I am not in to review process and didn't find", "one of my comments > > If we are uncertain about the number,", "can read one of my comments > > If we are uncertain about", "be started if at least 'n' reviewers accept and the remaining can >", "what are the potential issues with this question to refrain before posting questions", "about the notation used by Elsevier. I don't know whether I need to", "a duplicate of another. And I am not aware whether the community-specific reason", "find explicit information regarding it? How safe it is to say that the", "apt because I don't know about the notation used by Elsevier. I don't" ]
[ "in question. Here are some examples (by no means a complete list, I", "* [Is it possible to change the application area of research while looking", "potentially have thousands of versions of this same question. So, I propose that", "physics) * [Is it possible to change the application area of research while", "we might need multiple duplicate targets because some fields have fundamentally different considerations.", "of these are duplicates except for the fields in question. Here are some", "of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to:", "--> atmospheric) * [How to: Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math -->", "physics) * [Physics PhD switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics -->", "application area of research while looking for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material", "PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy) * [Switching fields in a postdoc after", "Since there are a lot of combinations between current field and target field,", "-- how to change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical", "the idea that we might need multiple duplicate targets because some fields have", "after PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there", "to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects -- how", "would be to have a single canonical question that covers all fields, but", "* [Switching fields in a postdoc after PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology)", "that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there are a lot", "are a lot of combinations between current field and target field, we could", "target field, we could potentially have thousands of versions of this same question.", "are some examples (by no means a complete list, I just got tired", "and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to: Change of research field", "a PhD but before getting a permanent position. I think the most straightforward", "fields after earning a PhD but before getting a permanent position. I think", "switching fields after earning a PhD but before getting a permanent position. I", "area of research while looking for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science", "a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy) * [Switching fields", "green energy) * [Switching fields in a postdoc after PhD, is that possible", "of combinations between current field and target field, we could potentially have thousands", "of copying and pasting): * [Change of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil", "(material science --> green energy) * [Switching fields in a postdoc after PhD,", "number of questions about switching fields after PhD. Most of these are duplicates", "change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects -- how to", "--> theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle", "break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible to change the", "possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there are a lot of", "we consolidate our questions about switching fields after earning a PhD but before", "might need multiple duplicate targets because some fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts?", "PhD a good time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate,", "fields after PhD. Most of these are duplicates except for the fields in", "physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible to change the application area", "position. I think the most straightforward solution would be to have a single", "have a very high number of questions about switching fields after PhD. Most", "Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to: Change of research field after", "(theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects -- how to change subfields", "PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to: Change of research", "[Is it possible to change the application area of research while looking for", "--> math) * [Is just after your PhD a good time to switch", "I just got tired of copying and pasting): * [Change of field between", "propose that we consolidate our questions about switching fields after earning a PhD", "fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate for this canonical question now exists", "but before getting a permanent position. I think the most straightforward solution would", "fields, but I'm open to the idea that we might need multiple duplicate", "fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate for this canonical question", "have thousands of versions of this same question. So, I propose that we", "that we consolidate our questions about switching fields after earning a PhD but", "pasting): * [Change of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric)", "--> clinical psychology) Since there are a lot of combinations between current field", "change the application area of research while looking for a postdoc position after", "could potentially have thousands of versions of this same question. So, I propose", "can I change fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD", "question. So, I propose that we consolidate our questions about switching fields after", "same question. So, I propose that we consolidate our questions about switching fields", "our questions about switching fields after earning a PhD but before getting a", "change fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD to postdoc", "it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD to postdoc with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field)", "science --> green energy) * [Switching fields in a postdoc after PhD, is", "these are duplicates except for the fields in question. Here are some examples", "an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects", "idea that we might need multiple duplicate targets because some fields have fundamentally", "from PhD to postdoc with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics -->", "different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate for this canonical question now exists [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd).", "how to change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics)", "PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD switching fields", "a single canonical question that covers all fields, but I'm open to the", "copying and pasting): * [Change of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering", "the fields in question. Here are some examples (by no means a complete", "be to have a single canonical question that covers all fields, but I'm", "that covers all fields, but I'm open to the idea that we might", "a postdoc after PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology)", "questions about switching fields after PhD. Most of these are duplicates except for", "--> theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects -- how to change subfields between PhD", "to change the application area of research while looking for a postdoc position", "--> atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible to change the application area of", "We have a very high number of questions about switching fields after PhD.", "switching fields after PhD. Most of these are duplicates except for the fields", "(civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to: Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis)", "thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is just after your PhD a good time", "(biological physics --> theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD switching fields after short career", "in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there are a lot of combinations", "question. Here are some examples (by no means a complete list, I just", "getting a permanent position. I think the most straightforward solution would be to", "before getting a permanent position. I think the most straightforward solution would be", "clinical psychology) Since there are a lot of combinations between current field and", "field, we could potentially have thousands of versions of this same question. So,", "field and target field, we could potentially have thousands of versions of this", "examples (by no means a complete list, I just got tired of copying", "field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is just after your PhD a", "PhD to postdoc with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical", "* [Change of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) ", " [Practical aspects -- how to change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological", "except for the fields in question. Here are some examples (by no means", "postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD switching fields after short", "--> green energy) * [Switching fields in a postdoc after PhD, is that", "[Switching fields in a postdoc after PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology", "good time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate, can I", "theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics", "the most straightforward solution would be to have a single canonical question that", "after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy) * [Switching fields in a postdoc", "research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is just after your PhD", "a good time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate, can", "change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics) * [Physics", "Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is just after", "question that covers all fields, but I'm open to the idea that we", "that we might need multiple duplicate targets because some fields have fundamentally different", "area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate, can I change fields and get back into", "and pasting): * [Change of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering -->", "* [Recent PhD graduate, can I change fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it)", "after your PhD a good time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent", "versions of this same question. So, I propose that we consolidate our questions", "field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to: Change", "I change fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD to", "a permanent position. I think the most straightforward solution would be to have", "intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects --", "psychology) Since there are a lot of combinations between current field and target", "straightforward solution would be to have a single canonical question that covers all", "about switching fields after PhD. Most of these are duplicates except for the", "possible to change the application area of research while looking for a postdoc", "this same question. So, I propose that we consolidate our questions about switching", "in a postdoc after PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical", "current field and target field, we could potentially have thousands of versions of", "after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is just after your PhD a good", "after earning a PhD but before getting a permanent position. I think the", "fields in question. Here are some examples (by no means a complete list,", "of versions of this same question. So, I propose that we consolidate our", "engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to: Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math", "[Is just after your PhD a good time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area)", "after PhD. Most of these are duplicates except for the fields in question.", "switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate, can I change fields and", "to postdoc with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics)", "permanent position. I think the most straightforward solution would be to have a", "I'm open to the idea that we might need multiple duplicate targets because", "PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there are", "about switching fields after earning a PhD but before getting a permanent position.", "have a single canonical question that covers all fields, but I'm open to", "there are a lot of combinations between current field and target field, we", "So, I propose that we consolidate our questions about switching fields after earning", "just got tired of copying and pasting): * [Change of field between PhD", "I propose that we consolidate our questions about switching fields after earning a", "I think the most straightforward solution would be to have a single canonical", "fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is it", "it possible to change the application area of research while looking for a", "consolidate our questions about switching fields after earning a PhD but before getting", "to: Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is just", "to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate, can I change fields", "thousands of versions of this same question. So, I propose that we consolidate", "[How to: Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is", "between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How to: Change of", "switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is", "physics --> theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects -- how to change subfields between", "single canonical question that covers all fields, but I'm open to the idea", "with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) * [Practical", "duplicates except for the fields in question. Here are some examples (by no", "covers all fields, but I'm open to the idea that we might need", "some fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate for this canonical", "the application area of research while looking for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/)", "get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD to postdoc with an intent", "of research while looking for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science -->", "questions about switching fields after earning a PhD but before getting a permanent", "PhD graduate, can I change fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition", "tired of copying and pasting): * [Change of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc)", "for the fields in question. Here are some examples (by no means a", "[Change of field between PhD and Postdoc](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/182680/change-of-field-between-phd-and-postdoc) (civil engineering --> atmospheric) * [How", "* [How to: Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) ", "physics --> theoretical physics) [Physics PhD switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break)", "all fields, but I'm open to the idea that we might need multiple", "[Recent PhD graduate, can I change fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) ", "need multiple duplicate targets because some fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update:", " [Is just after your PhD a good time to switch your research", "your PhD a good time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD", "(math --> math) * [Is just after your PhD a good time to", "a complete list, I just got tired of copying and pasting): * [Change", "* [Physics PhD switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric", "research while looking for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green", "PhD but before getting a permanent position. I think the most straightforward solution", "open to the idea that we might need multiple duplicate targets because some", "short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible to", "between current field and target field, we could potentially have thousands of versions", "high number of questions about switching fields after PhD. Most of these are", "means a complete list, I just got tired of copying and pasting): ", "(by no means a complete list, I just got tired of copying and", "to change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics) ", "postdoc after PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since", "list, I just got tired of copying and pasting): * [Change of field", "between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD switching", "position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy) * [Switching fields in a", "psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there are a lot of combinations between", "lot of combinations between current field and target field, we could potentially have", "and target field, we could potentially have thousands of versions of this same", "got tired of copying and pasting): * [Change of field between PhD and", "and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD to postdoc with an", "think the most straightforward solution would be to have a single canonical question", "of questions about switching fields after PhD. Most of these are duplicates except", "just after your PhD a good time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) ", "(neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there are a lot of combinations between current", "complete list, I just got tired of copying and pasting): [Change of", "after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible", "very high number of questions about switching fields after PhD. Most of these", "field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects -- how to change", "(particle physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible to change the application", "atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible to change the application area of research", "math) * [Is just after your PhD a good time to switch your", "fields in a postdoc after PhD, is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology -->", "energy) * [Switching fields in a postdoc after PhD, is that possible in", "because some fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate for this", "fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD to postdoc with", "theoretical physics) * [Practical aspects -- how to change subfields between PhD and", "we could potentially have thousands of versions of this same question. So, I", "a lot of combinations between current field and target field, we could potentially", "[Physics PhD switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics)", "combinations between current field and target field, we could potentially have thousands of", "back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD to postdoc with an intent to", "most straightforward solution would be to have a single canonical question that covers", "your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate, can I change fields and get", "Here are some examples (by no means a complete list, I just got", "research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate, can I change fields and get back", "Most of these are duplicates except for the fields in question. Here are", "is that possible in psychology?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/118470/switching-fields-in-a-postdoc-after-phd-is-that-possible-in-psychology) (neuropsychology --> clinical psychology) Since there are a", "and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD switching fields after", "no means a complete list, I just got tired of copying and pasting):", "a very high number of questions about switching fields after PhD. Most of", "* [Transition from PhD to postdoc with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical", "subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics --> theoretical physics) * [Physics PhD", "while looking for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy)", "multiple duplicate targets because some fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A", "[Practical aspects -- how to change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics", "into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from PhD to postdoc with an intent to change", "for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy) * [Switching", "duplicate targets because some fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate", "to have a single canonical question that covers all fields, but I'm open", "of this same question. So, I propose that we consolidate our questions about", "of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math) * [Is just after your", "atmospheric) * [How to: Change of research field after thesis](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/170391/how-to-change-of-research-field-after-thesis) (math --> math)", "career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics) * [Is it possible to change", "PhD switching fields after short career break?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/128281/physics-phd-switching-fields-after-short-career-break) (particle physics --> atmospheric physics) ", "looking for a postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy) ", "aspects -- how to change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc) (biological physics -->", "but I'm open to the idea that we might need multiple duplicate targets", "to the idea that we might need multiple duplicate targets because some fields", "have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate for this canonical question now", "physics) * [Practical aspects -- how to change subfields between PhD and postdoc?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/144187/practical-aspects-how-to-change-subfields-between-phd-and-postdoc)", "canonical question that covers all fields, but I'm open to the idea that", "targets because some fields have fundamentally different considerations. Thoughts? Update: A candidate for", "time to switch your research area?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/149933/is-just-after-your-phd-a-good-time-to-switch-your-research-area) * [Recent PhD graduate, can I change", "graduate, can I change fields and get back into it?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/103203/recent-phd-graduate-can-i-change-fields-and-get-back-into-it) * [Transition from", "postdoc with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics --> theoretical physics) ", "postdoc position after PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/130803/) (material science --> green energy) [Switching fields in", "PhD. Most of these are duplicates except for the fields in question. Here", "earning a PhD but before getting a permanent position. I think the most", "solution would be to have a single canonical question that covers all fields,", "[Transition from PhD to postdoc with an intent to change field](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/7997/transition-from-phd-to-postdoc-with-an-intent-to-change-field) (theoretical physics", "are duplicates except for the fields in question. Here are some examples (by", "some examples (by no means a complete list, I just got tired of" ]
[ "to close voters: > > Questions about switching from X to Y may", "canonical questions more \"findable\" would be to simply create a tag named canonical", "for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to note to close", "float around in the sea of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless", "[journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2. Although canonical questions do exist, they", "the feeling that often, questions that kind of fall into canonical territory get", "canonical question. > > > I think that is a great addition and", "below answer actually > answers OP's question before voting to close! If the", "ad this tag to all the canonical questions, with an explanation in the", "around in the sea of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless you", "this tag to all the canonical questions, with an explanation in the tag", "field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to note to close voters:", "unless you actively click on them. My suggestion for making the canonical questions", "making the canonical questions more \"findable\" would be to simply create a tag", "actively click on them. My suggestion for making the canonical questions more \"findable\"", "note to close voters: > > Questions about switching from X to Y", "below (other than the specific fields), > the question should be left open", "questions that kind of fall into canonical territory get closed even though the", "(other than the specific fields), > the question should be left open until", "canonical questions, as I have the feeling that often, questions that kind of", "1. The recently established [canonical question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the", "However, please be sure that the below answer actually > answers OP's question", "> > > I think that is a great addition and should be", "specific fields), > the question should be left open until its answers are", "of fall into canonical territory get closed even though the specific answer is", "voters: > > Questions about switching from X to Y may be closed", "satisfactory) included in the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those).", "on how canonical questions work, how people are invited to add to them", "questions: 1. The recently established [canonical question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has", "an explanation in the tag wiki on how canonical questions work, how people", "explanation in the tag wiki on how canonical questions work, how people are", "> the question should be left open until its answers are merged into", "is one of those). 2. Although canonical questions do exist, they are not", "as I have the feeling that often, questions that kind of fall into", "I think that is a great addition and should be included in all", "and ad this tag to all the canonical questions, with an explanation in", "questions, as I have the feeling that often, questions that kind of fall", "the specific answer is not (yet satisfactory) included in the canonical answer (the", "its answers are merged into > this canonical question. > > > I", "close voters: > > Questions about switching from X to Y may be", "I have the feeling that often, questions that kind of fall into canonical", "canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2. Although canonical questions", "be included in all canonical questions, as I have the feeling that often,", "territory get closed even though the specific answer is not (yet satisfactory) included", "2. Although canonical questions do exist, they are not easy to find as", "the question should be left open until its answers are merged into >", "question asks > about something not covered below (other than the specific fields),", "are merged into > this canonical question. > > > I think that", "> > I think that is a great addition and should be included", "should be included in all canonical questions, as I have the feeling that", "> answers OP's question before voting to close! If the question asks >", "you actively click on them. My suggestion for making the canonical questions more", "and should be included in all canonical questions, as I have the feeling", "be to simply create a tag named canonical and ad this tag to", "those). 2. Although canonical questions do exist, they are not easy to find", "that kind of fall into canonical territory get closed even though the specific", "Questions about switching from X to Y may be closed as a duplicate", "may be closed as a duplicate of this. However, please be sure that", "> Questions about switching from X to Y may be closed as a", "answer actually > answers OP's question before voting to close! If the question", "is a great addition and should be included in all canonical questions, as", "following added to note to close voters: > > Questions about switching from", "into > this canonical question. > > > I think that is a", "even though the specific answer is not (yet satisfactory) included in the canonical", "PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to note to close voters: > > Questions", "questions, with an explanation in the tag wiki on how canonical questions work,", "about something not covered below (other than the specific fields), > the question", "Y may be closed as a duplicate of this. However, please be sure", "that the below answer actually > answers OP's question before voting to close!", "before voting to close! If the question asks > about something not covered", "the following added to note to close voters: > > Questions about switching", "> I think that is a great addition and should be included in", "are not easy to find as the float around in the sea of", "the sea of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless you actively click", "than the specific fields), > the question should be left open until its", "not (yet satisfactory) included in the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one", "answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2. Although canonical questions do", "X to Y may be closed as a duplicate of this. However, please", "that is a great addition and should be included in all canonical questions,", "to note to close voters: > > Questions about switching from X to", "open until its answers are merged into > this canonical question. > >", "added to note to close voters: > > Questions about switching from X", "canonical territory get closed even though the specific answer is not (yet satisfactory)", "in the sea of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless you actively", "of those). 2. Although canonical questions do exist, they are not easy to", "them. My suggestion for making the canonical questions more \"findable\" would be to", "My suggestion for making the canonical questions more \"findable\" would be to simply", "to close! If the question asks > about something not covered below (other", "exist, they are not easy to find as the float around in the", "after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to note to close voters: > >", "canonical questions do exist, they are not easy to find as the float", "though the specific answer is not (yet satisfactory) included in the canonical answer", "voting to close! If the question asks > about something not covered below", "answers are merged into > this canonical question. > > > I think", "> > Questions about switching from X to Y may be closed as", "fields), > the question should be left open until its answers are merged", "into canonical territory get closed even though the specific answer is not (yet", "the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2. Although canonical", "to find as the float around in the sea of questions indistinguishable from", "until its answers are merged into > this canonical question. > > >", "workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2. Although canonical questions do exist, they are", "the canonical questions, with an explanation in the tag wiki on how canonical", "as the float around in the sea of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical", "questions more \"findable\" would be to simply create a tag named canonical and", "often, questions that kind of fall into canonical territory get closed even though", "the specific fields), > the question should be left open until its answers", "one of those). 2. Although canonical questions do exist, they are not easy", "questions do exist, they are not easy to find as the float around", "merged into > this canonical question. > > > I think that is", "do exist, they are not easy to find as the float around in", "suggestion for making the canonical questions more \"findable\" would be to simply create", "a tag named canonical and ad this tag to all the canonical questions,", "for canonical questions: 1. The recently established [canonical question for field switching after", "switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to note to close voters: >", "on them. My suggestion for making the canonical questions more \"findable\" would be", "get closed even though the specific answer is not (yet satisfactory) included in", "tag wiki on how canonical questions work, how people are invited to add", "(the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2. Although canonical questions do exist,", "create a tag named canonical and ad this tag to all the canonical", "covered below (other than the specific fields), > the question should be left", "from other, non-canonical questions unless you actively click on them. My suggestion for", "has the following added to note to close voters: > > Questions about", "closed as a duplicate of this. However, please be sure that the below", "easy to find as the float around in the sea of questions indistinguishable", "feeling that often, questions that kind of fall into canonical territory get closed", "have the feeling that often, questions that kind of fall into canonical territory", "of this. However, please be sure that the below answer actually > answers", "all the canonical questions, with an explanation in the tag wiki on how", "a great addition and should be included in all canonical questions, as I", "as a duplicate of this. However, please be sure that the below answer", "indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless you actively click on them. My suggestion", "switching from X to Y may be closed as a duplicate of this.", "fall into canonical territory get closed even though the specific answer is not", "should be left open until its answers are merged into > this canonical", "wiki on how canonical questions work, how people are invited to add to", "in the tag wiki on how canonical questions work, how people are invited", "the tag wiki on how canonical questions work, how people are invited to", "Although canonical questions do exist, they are not easy to find as the", "in the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2. Although", "be closed as a duplicate of this. However, please be sure that the", "from X to Y may be closed as a duplicate of this. However,", "to all the canonical questions, with an explanation in the tag wiki on", "question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to note to", "tag to all the canonical questions, with an explanation in the tag wiki", "included in all canonical questions, as I have the feeling that often, questions", "be left open until its answers are merged into > this canonical question.", "2 suggestions for canonical questions: 1. The recently established [canonical question for field", "question. > > > I think that is a great addition and should", "the canonical questions more \"findable\" would be to simply create a tag named", "> about something not covered below (other than the specific fields), > the", "kind of fall into canonical territory get closed even though the specific answer", "the below answer actually > answers OP's question before voting to close! If", "addition and should be included in all canonical questions, as I have the", "canonical questions, with an explanation in the tag wiki on how canonical questions", "established [canonical question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to", "to Y may be closed as a duplicate of this. However, please be", "questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless you actively click on them. My", "> this canonical question. > > > I think that is a great", "not covered below (other than the specific fields), > the question should be", "named canonical and ad this tag to all the canonical questions, with an", "click on them. My suggestion for making the canonical questions more \"findable\" would", "the question asks > about something not covered below (other than the specific", "recently established [canonical question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added", "that often, questions that kind of fall into canonical territory get closed even", "be sure that the below answer actually > answers OP's question before voting", "is not (yet satisfactory) included in the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is", "this canonical question. > > > I think that is a great addition", "[canonical question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following added to note", "would be to simply create a tag named canonical and ad this tag", "other, non-canonical questions unless you actively click on them. My suggestion for making", "all canonical questions, as I have the feeling that often, questions that kind", "please be sure that the below answer actually > answers OP's question before", "sea of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless you actively click on", "\"findable\" would be to simply create a tag named canonical and ad this", "to simply create a tag named canonical and ad this tag to all", "closed even though the specific answer is not (yet satisfactory) included in the", "think that is a great addition and should be included in all canonical", "duplicate of this. However, please be sure that the below answer actually >", "tag named canonical and ad this tag to all the canonical questions, with", "asks > about something not covered below (other than the specific fields), >", "a duplicate of this. However, please be sure that the below answer actually", "actually > answers OP's question before voting to close! If the question asks", "this. However, please be sure that the below answer actually > answers OP's", "something not covered below (other than the specific fields), > the question should", "for making the canonical questions more \"findable\" would be to simply create a", "specific answer is not (yet satisfactory) included in the canonical answer (the [journal", "the float around in the sea of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions", "answers OP's question before voting to close! If the question asks > about", "they are not easy to find as the float around in the sea", "more \"findable\" would be to simply create a tag named canonical and ad", "question before voting to close! If the question asks > about something not", "OP's question before voting to close! If the question asks > about something", "in all canonical questions, as I have the feeling that often, questions that", "included in the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of those). 2.", "how canonical questions work, how people are invited to add to them etc.", "about switching from X to Y may be closed as a duplicate of", "If the question asks > about something not covered below (other than the", "canonical and ad this tag to all the canonical questions, with an explanation", "question should be left open until its answers are merged into > this", "answer is not (yet satisfactory) included in the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a)", "of questions indistinguishable from other, non-canonical questions unless you actively click on them.", "with an explanation in the tag wiki on how canonical questions work, how", "simply create a tag named canonical and ad this tag to all the", "questions unless you actively click on them. My suggestion for making the canonical", "great addition and should be included in all canonical questions, as I have", "sure that the below answer actually > answers OP's question before voting to", "non-canonical questions unless you actively click on them. My suggestion for making the", "close! If the question asks > about something not covered below (other than", "(yet satisfactory) included in the canonical answer (the [journal workflow](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/55665/what-does-the-typical-workflow-of-a-journal-look-like-how-should-i-interpret-a) is one of", "not easy to find as the float around in the sea of questions", "suggestions for canonical questions: 1. The recently established [canonical question for field switching", "The recently established [canonical question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd) has the following", "canonical questions: 1. The recently established [canonical question for field switching after PhD](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd)", "left open until its answers are merged into > this canonical question. >", "find as the float around in the sea of questions indistinguishable from other," ]
[ "because I am science manager. I have a PhD, I worked at different", "is smart. As a consequence I am banned from answering, which paralyzes me", "good knowledge about it. I can contribute with answers and suggestions, but not", "is: I participate in Academia stack because I am science manager. I have", "answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that and even another commenter", "copyright policy, I have some good knowledge about it. I can contribute with", "an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that and even another", "content-wise correct, even though others disagree if my suggestion is smart. As a", "have a PhD, I worked at different academic institutions. Since my PhD is", "stack because I am science manager. I have a PhD, I worked at", "suggestions, but not with questions. So my question is 1. How to unban", "tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that and even another commenter did not see", "I participate in Academia stack because I am science manager. I have a", "contribute with answers and suggestions, but not with questions. So my question is", "am wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong is suitable for most of the", "couple of question but have got constantly bad reactions, which for some reason", "some reason are not very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave", "somewhat not acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct,", "I answered a couple of question but have got constantly bad reactions, which", "is content-wise correct, even though others disagree if my suggestion is smart. As", "bad reactions, which for some reason are not very well liked. 1. In", "have some good knowledge about it. I can contribute with answers and suggestions,", "with questions. So my question is 1. How to unban myself? 2. How", "smart. As a consequence I am banned from answering, which paralyzes me on", "well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer, which was tagged", "paralyzes me on this platform. My take on this platform is: I participate", "is on copyright policy, I have some good knowledge about it. I can", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see", "this platform is: I participate in Academia stack because I am science manager.", "not with questions. So my question is 1. How to unban myself? 2.", "again? Overall, I am wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong is suitable for", "Stack, though I have been participating in other stacks before. I answered a", "on this platform, because the questions seem to be very often rather vague,", "stacks before. I answered a couple of question but have got constantly bad", "prevent from being banned again? Overall, I am wondering, whether the modus of", "answered a couple of question but have got constantly bad reactions, which for", "the modus of right/wrong is suitable for most of the questions asked on", "a PhD, I worked at different academic institutions. Since my PhD is on", "questions asked on this platform, because the questions seem to be very often", "others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct, even though others disagree", "modus of right/wrong is suitable for most of the questions asked on this", "a couple of question but have got constantly bad reactions, which for some", "3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct, even though others disagree if", "So my question is 1. How to unban myself? 2. How to prevent", "another commenter did not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an", "can contribute with answers and suggestions, but not with questions. So my question", "reason are not very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an", "whether the modus of right/wrong is suitable for most of the questions asked", "asked on this platform, because the questions seem to be very often rather", "the questions seem to be very often rather vague, which makes answer suggestions.", "and even another commenter did not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I", "before. I answered a couple of question but have got constantly bad reactions,", "not acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct, even", "some good knowledge about it. I can contribute with answers and suggestions, but", "PhD, I worked at different academic institutions. Since my PhD is on copyright", "answers and suggestions, but not with questions. So my question is 1. How", "different academic institutions. Since my PhD is on copyright policy, I have some", "are not very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer,", "that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer based on my expert", "participating in other stacks before. I answered a couple of question but have", "about it. I can contribute with answers and suggestions, but not with questions.", "me on this platform. My take on this platform is: I participate in", "science manager. I have a PhD, I worked at different academic institutions. Since", "platform, because the questions seem to be very often rather vague, which makes", "am new to this Stack, though I have been participating in other stacks", "questions. So my question is 1. How to unban myself? 2. How to", "How to unban myself? 2. How to prevent from being banned again? Overall,", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer based on my expert knowledge, which seems", "disagree if my suggestion is smart. As a consequence I am banned from", "though others disagree if my suggestion is smart. As a consequence I am", "in Academia stack because I am science manager. I have a PhD, I", "consequence I am banned from answering, which paralyzes me on this platform. My", "but have got constantly bad reactions, which for some reason are not very", "unban myself? 2. How to prevent from being banned again? Overall, I am", "I give an answer based on my expert knowledge, which seems to be", "am science manager. I have a PhD, I worked at different academic institutions.", "very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer, which was", "was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that and even another commenter did not", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct, even though others disagree if my suggestion", "to prevent from being banned again? Overall, I am wondering, whether the modus", "it. I can contribute with answers and suggestions, but not with questions. So", "at different academic institutions. Since my PhD is on copyright policy, I have", "knowledge, which seems to be somewhat not acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895)", "is 1. How to unban myself? 2. How to prevent from being banned", "myself? 2. How to prevent from being banned again? Overall, I am wondering,", "on my expert knowledge, which seems to be somewhat not acceptable for others.", "commenter did not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer", "answer based on my expert knowledge, which seems to be somewhat not acceptable", "Overall, I am wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong is suitable for most", "that and even another commenter did not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query", "to be somewhat not acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is", "but not with questions. So my question is 1. How to unban myself?", "which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that and even another commenter did", "policy, I have some good knowledge about it. I can contribute with answers", "for some reason are not very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I", "I gave an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that and", "from answering, which paralyzes me on this platform. My take on this platform", "and suggestions, but not with questions. So my question is 1. How to", "on this platform is: I participate in Academia stack because I am science", "manager. I have a PhD, I worked at different academic institutions. Since my", "Academia stack because I am science manager. I have a PhD, I worked", "a consequence I am banned from answering, which paralyzes me on this platform.", "I am banned from answering, which paralyzes me on this platform. My take", "to this Stack, though I have been participating in other stacks before. I", "seems to be somewhat not acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that", "on copyright policy, I have some good knowledge about it. I can contribute", "my question is 1. How to unban myself? 2. How to prevent from", "I don't see that and even another commenter did not see that. 2.", "correct, even though others disagree if my suggestion is smart. As a consequence", "the questions asked on this platform, because the questions seem to be very", "most of the questions asked on this platform, because the questions seem to", "if my suggestion is smart. As a consequence I am banned from answering,", "I have some good knowledge about it. I can contribute with answers and", "liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\".", "query I give an answer based on my expert knowledge, which seems to", "in other stacks before. I answered a couple of question but have got", "reactions, which for some reason are not very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896)", "constantly bad reactions, which for some reason are not very well liked. 1.", "suggestion is smart. As a consequence I am banned from answering, which paralyzes", "not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer based on", "How to prevent from being banned again? Overall, I am wondering, whether the", "did not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer based", "see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer based on my", "academic institutions. Since my PhD is on copyright policy, I have some good", "don't see that and even another commenter did not see that. 2. In", "question but have got constantly bad reactions, which for some reason are not", "As a consequence I am banned from answering, which paralyzes me on this", "with answers and suggestions, but not with questions. So my question is 1.", "platform. My take on this platform is: I participate in Academia stack because", "is suitable for most of the questions asked on this platform, because the", "\"unclear\". I don't see that and even another commenter did not see that.", "been participating in other stacks before. I answered a couple of question but", "that is content-wise correct, even though others disagree if my suggestion is smart.", "my expert knowledge, which seems to be somewhat not acceptable for others. 3.", "be somewhat not acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise", "I have a PhD, I worked at different academic institutions. Since my PhD", "participate in Academia stack because I am science manager. I have a PhD,", "I am wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong is suitable for most of", "which for some reason are not very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions", "new to this Stack, though I have been participating in other stacks before.", "got constantly bad reactions, which for some reason are not very well liked.", "wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong is suitable for most of the questions", "2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer based on my expert knowledge,", "query that is content-wise correct, even though others disagree if my suggestion is", "based on my expert knowledge, which seems to be somewhat not acceptable for", "am banned from answering, which paralyzes me on this platform. My take on", "My take on this platform is: I participate in Academia stack because I", "take on this platform is: I participate in Academia stack because I am", "I am science manager. I have a PhD, I worked at different academic", "my suggestion is smart. As a consequence I am banned from answering, which", "not very well liked. 1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer, which", "platform is: I participate in Academia stack because I am science manager. I", "see that and even another commenter did not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285)", "In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't", "answering, which paralyzes me on this platform. My take on this platform is:", "I worked at different academic institutions. Since my PhD is on copyright policy,", "1. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186811/is-it-academic-dishonesty-if-i-committed-my-exam-answers-into-a-private-github-r/186896#186896) questions I gave an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I", "this Stack, though I have been participating in other stacks before. I answered", "1. How to unban myself? 2. How to prevent from being banned again?", "banned again? Overall, I am wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong is suitable", "give an answer based on my expert knowledge, which seems to be somewhat", "banned from answering, which paralyzes me on this platform. My take on this", "even though others disagree if my suggestion is smart. As a consequence I", "on this platform. My take on this platform is: I participate in Academia", "questions I gave an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that", "which paralyzes me on this platform. My take on this platform is: I", "knowledge about it. I can contribute with answers and suggestions, but not with", "others disagree if my suggestion is smart. As a consequence I am banned", "which seems to be somewhat not acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query", "this platform. My take on this platform is: I participate in Academia stack", "PhD is on copyright policy, I have some good knowledge about it. I", "I am new to this Stack, though I have been participating in other", "from being banned again? Overall, I am wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong", "worked at different academic institutions. Since my PhD is on copyright policy, I", "institutions. Since my PhD is on copyright policy, I have some good knowledge", "of right/wrong is suitable for most of the questions asked on this platform,", "of question but have got constantly bad reactions, which for some reason are", "because the questions seem to be very often rather vague, which makes answer", "question is 1. How to unban myself? 2. How to prevent from being", "though I have been participating in other stacks before. I answered a couple", "Since my PhD is on copyright policy, I have some good knowledge about", "other stacks before. I answered a couple of question but have got constantly", "I have been participating in other stacks before. I answered a couple of", "even another commenter did not see that. 2. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give", "2. How to prevent from being banned again? Overall, I am wondering, whether", "suitable for most of the questions asked on this platform, because the questions", "my PhD is on copyright policy, I have some good knowledge about it.", "expert knowledge, which seems to be somewhat not acceptable for others. 3. In", "acceptable for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct, even though", "have been participating in other stacks before. I answered a couple of question", "an answer based on my expert knowledge, which seems to be somewhat not", "I can contribute with answers and suggestions, but not with questions. So my", "gave an answer, which was tagged \"unclear\". I don't see that and even", "being banned again? Overall, I am wondering, whether the modus of right/wrong is", "for most of the questions asked on this platform, because the questions seem", "right/wrong is suitable for most of the questions asked on this platform, because", "to unban myself? 2. How to prevent from being banned again? Overall, I", "have got constantly bad reactions, which for some reason are not very well", "of the questions asked on this platform, because the questions seem to be", "for others. 3. In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct, even though others", "this platform, because the questions seem to be very often rather vague, which", "In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186988/are-there-any-international-standards-laws-or-governing-bodies-that-deal-with/187285#187285) query I give an answer based on my expert knowledge, which", "In [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/186887/advisor-is-using-my-ideas-as-grant-proposal/186895#186895) query that is content-wise correct, even though others disagree if my" ]
[ "a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed to think", "follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think there must have been 10", "recent](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187703/professor-stopped-replying-after-showing-interest-in-introductory-email) one are posted, all with the same tenor: > > I was", "I was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. ,", "professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed to think I", "seems to be a common issue, should we make a canonical question about", "> > I was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters", "months. So the question is: as this seems to be a common issue,", "good fit. After initial contact I sent them a follow up email to", "we make a canonical question about the etiquette and strategies when waiting for", "seemed to think I am a good fit. After initial contact I sent", "has been XX days since I wrote the email (sometimes as little as", "to be a common issue, should we make a canonical question about the", "etiquette and strategies when waiting for an answer? Or is this problem to", "is this problem to profane for that and we simply keep on linking", "this within the last few months. So the question is: as this seems", "answer? Or is this problem to profane for that and we simply keep", "program/etc. , and they seemed to think I am a good fit. After", "should we make a canonical question about the etiquette and strategies when waiting", "make a canonical question about the etiquette and strategies when waiting for an", "same tenor: > > I was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a", "problem to profane for that and we simply keep on linking them to", "one are posted, all with the same tenor: > > I was in", "initial contact I sent them a follow up email to which they did", "posted, all with the same tenor: > > I was in contact with", "in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they", "like [this recent](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187703/professor-stopped-replying-after-showing-interest-in-introductory-email) one are posted, all with the same tenor: > >", "must have been 10 or so questions like this within the last few", "3 days if I remember correctly), should I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\"", "if I remember correctly), should I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > >", "have been 10 or so questions like this within the last few months.", "It has been XX days since I wrote the email (sometimes as little", "> > > I think there must have been 10 or so questions", "they seemed to think I am a good fit. After initial contact I", "questions like [this recent](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187703/professor-stopped-replying-after-showing-interest-in-introductory-email) one are posted, all with the same tenor: >", "not reply (yet). It has been XX days since I wrote the email", "little as 3 days if I remember correctly), should I write a follow", "a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think there must have been", "I think there must have been 10 or so questions like this within", "I remember correctly), should I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > >", "up email to which they did not reply (yet). It has been XX", "so questions like this within the last few months. So the question is:", "contact I sent them a follow up email to which they did not", "as little as 3 days if I remember correctly), should I write a", "I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think there must", "a good fit. After initial contact I sent them a follow up email", "> I think there must have been 10 or so questions like this", "I sent them a follow up email to which they did not reply", "they did not reply (yet). It has been XX days since I wrote", "for that and we simply keep on linking them to the oldest such", "wrote the email (sometimes as little as 3 days if I remember correctly),", "am a good fit. After initial contact I sent them a follow up", "program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed to think I am a good fit.", ", and they seemed to think I am a good fit. After initial", "contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed", "up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think there must have been 10 or", "to profane for that and we simply keep on linking them to the", "we simply keep on linking them to the oldest such question and close", "which they did not reply (yet). It has been XX days since I", "there must have been 10 or so questions like this within the last", "strategies when waiting for an answer? Or is this problem to profane for", "a common issue, should we make a canonical question about the etiquette and", "think I am a good fit. After initial contact I sent them a", "questions like this within the last few months. So the question is: as", "the etiquette and strategies when waiting for an answer? Or is this problem", "question about the etiquette and strategies when waiting for an answer? Or is", "is: as this seems to be a common issue, should we make a", "days if I remember correctly), should I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" >", "the same tenor: > > I was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about", "to think I am a good fit. After initial contact I sent them", "(yet). It has been XX days since I wrote the email (sometimes as", "question is: as this seems to be a common issue, should we make", "should I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think there", "when waiting for an answer? Or is this problem to profane for that", "correctly), should I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think", "position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed to think I am a good", "since I wrote the email (sometimes as little as 3 days if I", "sent them a follow up email to which they did not reply (yet).", "So the question is: as this seems to be a common issue, should", "last few months. So the question is: as this seems to be a", "> I was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc.", "simply keep on linking them to the oldest such question and close as", "about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed to think I am", "and they seemed to think I am a good fit. After initial contact", "and we simply keep on linking them to the oldest such question and", "(sometimes as little as 3 days if I remember correctly), should I write", "keep on linking them to the oldest such question and close as duplicates?", "follow up email to which they did not reply (yet). It has been", "write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think there must have", "fit. After initial contact I sent them a follow up email to which", "Quite often, questions like [this recent](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187703/professor-stopped-replying-after-showing-interest-in-introductory-email) one are posted, all with the same", "waiting for an answer? Or is this problem to profane for that and", "all with the same tenor: > > I was in contact with a", "that and we simply keep on linking them to the oldest such question", "[this recent](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187703/professor-stopped-replying-after-showing-interest-in-introductory-email) one are posted, all with the same tenor: > > I", "a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed to think I am a", "think there must have been 10 or so questions like this within the", "to which they did not reply (yet). It has been XX days since", "been 10 or so questions like this within the last few months. So", "email/call/etc.?\" > > > I think there must have been 10 or so", "about the etiquette and strategies when waiting for an answer? Or is this", "I wrote the email (sometimes as little as 3 days if I remember", "few months. So the question is: as this seems to be a common", "with the same tenor: > > I was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc.", "or so questions like this within the last few months. So the question", "issue, should we make a canonical question about the etiquette and strategies when", "was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and", "be a common issue, should we make a canonical question about the etiquette", "did not reply (yet). It has been XX days since I wrote the", "often, questions like [this recent](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187703/professor-stopped-replying-after-showing-interest-in-introductory-email) one are posted, all with the same tenor:", "with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD program/masters program/etc. , and they seemed to", "email (sometimes as little as 3 days if I remember correctly), should I", "10 or so questions like this within the last few months. So the", "a follow up email to which they did not reply (yet). It has", "this problem to profane for that and we simply keep on linking them", "days since I wrote the email (sometimes as little as 3 days if", "After initial contact I sent them a follow up email to which they", "tenor: > > I was in contact with a professor/supervisor/etc. about a position/PhD", "within the last few months. So the question is: as this seems to", "I am a good fit. After initial contact I sent them a follow", "email to which they did not reply (yet). It has been XX days", "as 3 days if I remember correctly), should I write a follow up", "for an answer? Or is this problem to profane for that and we", "this seems to be a common issue, should we make a canonical question", "canonical question about the etiquette and strategies when waiting for an answer? Or", "> > I think there must have been 10 or so questions like", "like this within the last few months. So the question is: as this", "the email (sometimes as little as 3 days if I remember correctly), should", "a canonical question about the etiquette and strategies when waiting for an answer?", "been XX days since I wrote the email (sometimes as little as 3", "remember correctly), should I write a follow up email/call/etc.?\" > > > I", "the question is: as this seems to be a common issue, should we", "the last few months. So the question is: as this seems to be", "common issue, should we make a canonical question about the etiquette and strategies", "them a follow up email to which they did not reply (yet). It", "profane for that and we simply keep on linking them to the oldest", "and strategies when waiting for an answer? Or is this problem to profane", "XX days since I wrote the email (sometimes as little as 3 days", "as this seems to be a common issue, should we make a canonical", "reply (yet). It has been XX days since I wrote the email (sometimes", "Or is this problem to profane for that and we simply keep on", "are posted, all with the same tenor: > > I was in contact", "an answer? Or is this problem to profane for that and we simply" ]
[ "than the specific fields), the question should be left open until its answers", "[(How) Can I switch from field X to field Y after getting my", "about something not covered below (other than the specific fields), the question should", "> > > In [(How) Can I switch from field X to field", "this canonical question. > > > In [(How) Can I switch from field", "should be left open until its answers are merged into this canonical question.", "> > However, please be sure that the below answer actually answers OP's", "answers are merged into this canonical question. > > > In [(How) Can", "> > In [(How) Can I switch from field X to field Y", "something not covered below (other than the specific fields), the question should be", "question asks about something not covered below (other than the specific fields), the", "question should be left open until its answers are merged into this canonical", "before voting to close! If the question asks about something not covered below", "be sure that the below answer actually answers OP's question before voting to", "are merged into this canonical question. > > > In [(How) Can I", "be left open until its answers are merged into this canonical question. >", "actually answers OP's question before voting to close! If the question asks about", "open until its answers are merged into this canonical question. > > >", "> In [(How) Can I switch from field X to field Y after", "Can I switch from field X to field Y after getting my PhD?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/187461/how-can-i-switch-from-field-x-to-field-y-after-getting-my-phd)", "into this canonical question. > > > In [(How) Can I switch from", "question. > > > In [(How) Can I switch from field X to", "close! If the question asks about something not covered below (other than the", "answer actually answers OP's question before voting to close! If the question asks", "merged into this canonical question. > > > In [(How) Can I switch", "voting to close! If the question asks about something not covered below (other", "the below answer actually answers OP's question before voting to close! If the", "answers OP's question before voting to close! If the question asks about something", "the question asks about something not covered below (other than the specific fields),", "canonical question. > > > In [(How) Can I switch from field X", "that the below answer actually answers OP's question before voting to close! If", "> However, please be sure that the below answer actually answers OP's question", "the question should be left open until its answers are merged into this", "covered below (other than the specific fields), the question should be left open", "(other than the specific fields), the question should be left open until its", "not covered below (other than the specific fields), the question should be left", "below answer actually answers OP's question before voting to close! If the question", "If the question asks about something not covered below (other than the specific", "left open until its answers are merged into this canonical question. > >", "the specific fields), the question should be left open until its answers are", "specific fields), the question should be left open until its answers are merged", "However, please be sure that the below answer actually answers OP's question before", "question before voting to close! If the question asks about something not covered", "fields), the question should be left open until its answers are merged into", "OP's question before voting to close! If the question asks about something not", "to close! If the question asks about something not covered below (other than", "below (other than the specific fields), the question should be left open until", "sure that the below answer actually answers OP's question before voting to close!", "asks about something not covered below (other than the specific fields), the question", "please be sure that the below answer actually answers OP's question before voting", "In [(How) Can I switch from field X to field Y after getting", "until its answers are merged into this canonical question. > > > In", "its answers are merged into this canonical question. > > > In [(How)" ]
[ "so you need an actual throw away. I am annoyed. While it is", "that, if you go to academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt to ask", "actual throw away. I am annoyed. While it is obviously possible to get", "often involve legal or interpersonal issues; I was going to ask such a", "enter, so you need an actual throw away. I am annoyed. While it", "a question this morning. That is why I learned that, if you go", "learned that, if you go to academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt to", "such a question this morning. That is why I learned that, if you", "this morning. That is why I learned that, if you go to academia.SE", "throw away account, this is adding extra hurdles. Was this really necessary to", "now see this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not", "to the address you enter, so you need an actual throw away. I", "see this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not simply", "why I learned that, if you go to academia.SE in incognito mode and", "address, but will send a confirmation e-mail to the address you enter, so", "Moreover, the site will not simply let you create an account with a", "to get a throw away e-mail and set up a throw away account,", "which often involve legal or interpersonal issues; I was going to ask such", "user name of the form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly", "an account with a fake e-mail address, but will send a confirmation e-mail", "need an actual throw away. I am annoyed. While it is obviously possible", "go to academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt to ask a question you", "allow anyone to ask questions in guest mode, with a user name of", "a throw away e-mail and set up a throw away account, this is", "question you will now see this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the", "away. I am annoyed. While it is obviously possible to get a throw", "I was going to ask such a question this morning. That is why", "throw away. I am annoyed. While it is obviously possible to get a", "involve legal or interpersonal issues; I was going to ask such a question", "but will send a confirmation e-mail to the address you enter, so you", "a throw away account, this is adding extra hurdles. Was this really necessary", "and attempt to ask a question you will now see this screen: [![enter", "I learned that, if you go to academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt", "possible to get a throw away e-mail and set up a throw away", "This is particularly valuable for sites which often involve legal or interpersonal issues;", "academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt to ask a question you will now", "sites which often involve legal or interpersonal issues; I was going to ask", "image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not simply let you create an", "form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for sites which", "a fake e-mail address, but will send a confirmation e-mail to the address", "you need an actual throw away. I am annoyed. While it is obviously", ". See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for sites which often involve", "an actual throw away. I am annoyed. While it is obviously possible to", "ask such a question this morning. That is why I learned that, if", "That is why I learned that, if you go to academia.SE in incognito", "a question you will now see this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover,", "away e-mail and set up a throw away account, this is adding extra", "send a confirmation e-mail to the address you enter, so you need an", "used to allow anyone to ask questions in guest mode, with a user", "get a throw away e-mail and set up a throw away account, this", "the form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for sites", "going to ask such a question this morning. That is why I learned", "am annoyed. While it is obviously possible to get a throw away e-mail", "guest mode, with a user name of the form userXXXXX . See [this", "for sites which often involve legal or interpersonal issues; I was going to", "obviously possible to get a throw away e-mail and set up a throw", "and set up a throw away account, this is adding extra hurdles. Was", "account with a fake e-mail address, but will send a confirmation e-mail to", "a user name of the form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is", "question this morning. That is why I learned that, if you go to", "the address you enter, so you need an actual throw away. I am", "was going to ask such a question this morning. That is why I", "to academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt to ask a question you will", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for sites which often involve legal or interpersonal", "ask a question you will now see this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)", "away account, this is adding extra hurdles. Was this really necessary to keep", "if you go to academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt to ask a", "screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not simply let you", "throw away e-mail and set up a throw away account, this is adding", "mode and attempt to ask a question you will now see this screen:", "e-mail address, but will send a confirmation e-mail to the address you enter,", "issues; I was going to ask such a question this morning. That is", "to ask such a question this morning. That is why I learned that,", "you will now see this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site", "up a throw away account, this is adding extra hurdles. Was this really", "e-mail to the address you enter, so you need an actual throw away.", "description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not simply let you create an account", "to allow anyone to ask questions in guest mode, with a user name", "particularly valuable for sites which often involve legal or interpersonal issues; I was", "here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not simply let you create an account with", "you create an account with a fake e-mail address, but will send a", "create an account with a fake e-mail address, but will send a confirmation", "userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for sites which often", "fake e-mail address, but will send a confirmation e-mail to the address you", "interpersonal issues; I was going to ask such a question this morning. That", "of the form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for", "sites used to allow anyone to ask questions in guest mode, with a", "simply let you create an account with a fake e-mail address, but will", "with a fake e-mail address, but will send a confirmation e-mail to the", "incognito mode and attempt to ask a question you will now see this", "with a user name of the form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This", "the site will not simply let you create an account with a fake", "annoyed. While it is obviously possible to get a throw away e-mail and", "or interpersonal issues; I was going to ask such a question this morning.", "e-mail and set up a throw away account, this is adding extra hurdles.", "While it is obviously possible to get a throw away e-mail and set", "valuable for sites which often involve legal or interpersonal issues; I was going", "account, this is adding extra hurdles. Was this really necessary to keep out", "this is adding extra hurdles. Was this really necessary to keep out spam?", "SE sites used to allow anyone to ask questions in guest mode, with", "in incognito mode and attempt to ask a question you will now see", "in guest mode, with a user name of the form userXXXXX . See", "attempt to ask a question you will now see this screen: [![enter image", "name of the form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable", "mode, with a user name of the form userXXXXX . See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously).", "will send a confirmation e-mail to the address you enter, so you need", "to ask questions in guest mode, with a user name of the form", "confirmation e-mail to the address you enter, so you need an actual throw", "set up a throw away account, this is adding extra hurdles. Was this", "this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not simply let", "address you enter, so you need an actual throw away. I am annoyed.", "a confirmation e-mail to the address you enter, so you need an actual", "legal or interpersonal issues; I was going to ask such a question this", "morning. That is why I learned that, if you go to academia.SE in", "[this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for sites which often involve legal or", "site will not simply let you create an account with a fake e-mail", "will not simply let you create an account with a fake e-mail address,", "not simply let you create an account with a fake e-mail address, but", "is obviously possible to get a throw away e-mail and set up a", "is why I learned that, if you go to academia.SE in incognito mode", "questions in guest mode, with a user name of the form userXXXXX .", "[![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will not simply let you create", "you go to academia.SE in incognito mode and attempt to ask a question", "will now see this screen: [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/BiMoF.png) Moreover, the site will", "I am annoyed. While it is obviously possible to get a throw away", "to ask a question you will now see this screen: [![enter image description", "anyone to ask questions in guest mode, with a user name of the", "you enter, so you need an actual throw away. I am annoyed. While", "is particularly valuable for sites which often involve legal or interpersonal issues; I", "See [this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2001/asking-a-question-anonymously). This is particularly valuable for sites which often involve legal", "ask questions in guest mode, with a user name of the form userXXXXX", "it is obviously possible to get a throw away e-mail and set up", "let you create an account with a fake e-mail address, but will send" ]
[ "old exam and then accuse any student of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407)", "student of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was deleted as rude or abusive.", "[Why would I ever create a new exam when I can just re-use", "when I can just re-use an old exam and then accuse any student", "create a new exam when I can just re-use an old exam and", "exam and then accuse any student of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was", "accuse any student of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was deleted as rude", "exam when I can just re-use an old exam and then accuse any", "I ever create a new exam when I can just re-use an old", "an old exam and then accuse any student of obtaining a copy as", "ever create a new exam when I can just re-use an old exam", "re-use an old exam and then accuse any student of obtaining a copy", "and then accuse any student of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was deleted", "any student of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was deleted as rude or", "I can just re-use an old exam and then accuse any student of", "can just re-use an old exam and then accuse any student of obtaining", "just re-use an old exam and then accuse any student of obtaining a", "new exam when I can just re-use an old exam and then accuse", "of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was deleted as rude or abusive. Why?", "would I ever create a new exam when I can just re-use an", "then accuse any student of obtaining a copy as cheating?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/188407) was deleted as", "a new exam when I can just re-use an old exam and then" ]
[ "technically correct. However, it suggests to the author that they adopt practices that", "the author that they adopt practices that are harmful to acadaemia as a", "a whole purely for their own career advancement. This doesn't sit right with", "purely for their own career advancement. This doesn't sit right with me. Should", "answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/191033/72211) is technically correct. However, it suggests to the author that they adopt", "for their own career advancement. This doesn't sit right with me. Should we", "suggests to the author that they adopt practices that are harmful to acadaemia", "However, it suggests to the author that they adopt practices that are harmful", "it suggests to the author that they adopt practices that are harmful to", "that they adopt practices that are harmful to acadaemia as a whole purely", "[This answer](https://academia.stackexchange.com/a/191033/72211) is technically correct. However, it suggests to the author that they", "that are harmful to acadaemia as a whole purely for their own career", "to the author that they adopt practices that are harmful to acadaemia as", "own career advancement. This doesn't sit right with me. Should we allow answers", "correct. However, it suggests to the author that they adopt practices that are", "their own career advancement. This doesn't sit right with me. Should we allow", "acadaemia as a whole purely for their own career advancement. This doesn't sit", "advancement. This doesn't sit right with me. Should we allow answers like this?", "to acadaemia as a whole purely for their own career advancement. This doesn't", "whole purely for their own career advancement. This doesn't sit right with me.", "are harmful to acadaemia as a whole purely for their own career advancement.", "is technically correct. However, it suggests to the author that they adopt practices", "harmful to acadaemia as a whole purely for their own career advancement. This", "adopt practices that are harmful to acadaemia as a whole purely for their", "practices that are harmful to acadaemia as a whole purely for their own", "author that they adopt practices that are harmful to acadaemia as a whole", "as a whole purely for their own career advancement. This doesn't sit right", "they adopt practices that are harmful to acadaemia as a whole purely for", "career advancement. This doesn't sit right with me. Should we allow answers like" ]
[ "used for at least one answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily)", "looking answers to questions. It seems to have been used for at least", "it, which isn't always reliable. Should we take a position and make policy", "problem I see is that it might be difficult to \"notice\" its use.", "humans also (present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally,", "is that it generates text that can be factually \"questionable\" since it depends", "the usefulness and validity of this site if it is overused. But, then,", "you believe they are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize", "deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major criticism", "to permit it generally. There might be others as well. One problem I", "I'm generally skeptical of AI in its present form. We are, after all,", "its use could greatly degrade the usefulness and validity of this site if", "our peers. --- Insights into how a restrictive policy might be enforced would", "it, permit it with citation, or to permit it generally. There might be", "peers. --- Insights into how a restrictive policy might be enforced would be", "think its use could greatly degrade the usefulness and validity of this site", "that was used to train it, which isn't always reliable. Should we take", "some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these). --- The New York Times has", "The possibilities are to forbid it, permit it with citation, or to permit", "career guidance to our peers. --- Insights into how a restrictive policy might", "and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its use could greatly degrade the usefulness", "restrictive policy might be enforced would be welcome in answers if you believe", "they are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these). ---", "is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these). --- The New York Times", "There might be others as well. One problem I see is that it", "policy might be enforced would be welcome in answers if you believe they", "how to recognize these). --- The New York Times has an [article (probably", "[Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these). --- The New York", "well. One problem I see is that it might be difficult to \"notice\"", "at least one answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853)", "others as well. One problem I see is that it might be difficult", "in its present form. We are, after all, trying to provide valid career", "major criticism of it is that it generates text that can be factually", "citation, or to permit it generally. There might be others as well. One", "as well. One problem I see is that it might be difficult to", "take a position and make policy on using it? The possibilities are to", "generates text that can be factually \"questionable\" since it depends on the data", "since it depends on the data that was used to train it, which", "permit it with citation, or to permit it generally. There might be others", "to train it, which isn't always reliable. Should we take a position and", "degrade the usefulness and validity of this site if it is overused. But,", "be others as well. One problem I see is that it might be", "the data that was used to train it, which isn't always reliable. Should", "generally. There might be others as well. One problem I see is that", "might be difficult to \"notice\" its use. It might, therefore, be hard or", "problem is that humans also (present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and", "be factually \"questionable\" since it depends on the data that was used to", "company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its", "answers if you believe they are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how", "One problem I see is that it might be difficult to \"notice\" its", "enforce any policy. Another problem is that humans also (present company excluded) sometimes", "\"facts\". Personally, I think its use could greatly degrade the usefulness and validity", "reasonable looking answers to questions. It seems to have been used for at", "reliable. Should we take a position and make policy on using it? The", "might be enforced would be welcome in answers if you believe they are", "it is overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical of AI in its present", "are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these). --- The", "is that it might be difficult to \"notice\" its use. It might, therefore,", "faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its use could greatly degrade", "it generally. There might be others as well. One problem I see is", "to our peers. --- Insights into how a restrictive policy might be enforced", "assisted AI that can be used to generate reasonable looking answers to questions.", "AI that can be used to generate reasonable looking answers to questions. It", "into how a restrictive policy might be enforced would be welcome in answers", "present form. We are, after all, trying to provide valid career guidance to", "We are, after all, trying to provide valid career guidance to our peers.", "any policy. Another problem is that humans also (present company excluded) sometimes generate", "of AI in its present form. We are, after all, trying to provide", "in answers if you believe they are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about", "criticism of it is that it generates text that can be factually \"questionable\"", "answers to questions. It seems to have been used for at least one", "questions. It seems to have been used for at least one answer here", "difficult to \"notice\" its use. It might, therefore, be hard or impossible to", "are, after all, trying to provide valid career guidance to our peers. ---", "It seems to have been used for at least one answer here (now", "site if it is overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical of AI in", "on the data that was used to train it, which isn't always reliable.", "would be welcome in answers if you believe they are appropriate. [Here is", "or to permit it generally. There might be others as well. One problem", "using it? The possibilities are to forbid it, permit it with citation, or", "see is that it might be difficult to \"notice\" its use. It might,", "make policy on using it? The possibilities are to forbid it, permit it", "its use. It might, therefore, be hard or impossible to enforce any policy.", "of it is that it generates text that can be factually \"questionable\" since", "here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One", "factually \"questionable\" since it depends on the data that was used to train", "seems to have been used for at least one answer here (now deleted).", "isn't always reliable. Should we take a position and make policy on using", "(temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major criticism of it is that", "permit it generally. There might be others as well. One problem I see", "impossible to enforce any policy. Another problem is that humans also (present company", "be difficult to \"notice\" its use. It might, therefore, be hard or impossible", "of this site if it is overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical of", "unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its use could greatly degrade the usefulness and", "to \"notice\" its use. It might, therefore, be hard or impossible to enforce", "it with citation, or to permit it generally. There might be others as", "and validity of this site if it is overused. But, then, I'm generally", "how a restrictive policy might be enforced would be welcome in answers if", "to recognize these). --- The New York Times has an [article (probably paywalled)](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html)", "is a human assisted AI that can be used to generate reasonable looking", "these). --- The New York Times has an [article (probably paywalled)](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html) concerning ChatGPT.", "However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major criticism of", "validity of this site if it is overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical", "there. One major criticism of it is that it generates text that can", "data that was used to train it, which isn't always reliable. Should we", "if you believe they are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to", "be used to generate reasonable looking answers to questions. It seems to have", "possibilities are to forbid it, permit it with citation, or to permit it", "its present form. We are, after all, trying to provide valid career guidance", "discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these). --- The New York Times has an", "welcome in answers if you believe they are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853)", "on using it? The possibilities are to forbid it, permit it with citation,", "text that can be factually \"questionable\" since it depends on the data that", "that can be factually \"questionable\" since it depends on the data that was", "used to generate reasonable looking answers to questions. It seems to have been", "generate reasonable looking answers to questions. It seems to have been used for", "which isn't always reliable. Should we take a position and make policy on", "\"notice\" its use. It might, therefore, be hard or impossible to enforce any", "a human assisted AI that can be used to generate reasonable looking answers", "might be others as well. One problem I see is that it might", "to provide valid career guidance to our peers. --- Insights into how a", "answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there.", "[StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major criticism of it", "always reliable. Should we take a position and make policy on using it?", "it? The possibilities are to forbid it, permit it with citation, or to", "(now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major", "policy. Another problem is that humans also (present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty", "valid career guidance to our peers. --- Insights into how a restrictive policy", "excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its use", "use. It might, therefore, be hard or impossible to enforce any policy. Another", "banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major criticism of it is that it", "Personally, I think its use could greatly degrade the usefulness and validity of", "Should we take a position and make policy on using it? The possibilities", "it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major criticism of it is that it generates", "be enforced would be welcome in answers if you believe they are appropriate.", "to have been used for at least one answer here (now deleted). However", "Another problem is that humans also (present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning", "But, then, I'm generally skeptical of AI in its present form. We are,", "can be used to generate reasonable looking answers to questions. It seems to", "to forbid it, permit it with citation, or to permit it generally. There", "therefore, be hard or impossible to enforce any policy. Another problem is that", "it depends on the data that was used to train it, which isn't", "was used to train it, which isn't always reliable. Should we take a", "that it might be difficult to \"notice\" its use. It might, therefore, be", "least one answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for", "are to forbid it, permit it with citation, or to permit it generally.", "\"questionable\" since it depends on the data that was used to train it,", "can be factually \"questionable\" since it depends on the data that was used", "trying to provide valid career guidance to our peers. --- Insights into how", "it is that it generates text that can be factually \"questionable\" since it", "depends on the data that was used to train it, which isn't always", "position and make policy on using it? The possibilities are to forbid it,", "hard or impossible to enforce any policy. Another problem is that humans also", "we take a position and make policy on using it? The possibilities are", "I see is that it might be difficult to \"notice\" its use. It", "use could greatly degrade the usefulness and validity of this site if it", "skeptical of AI in its present form. We are, after all, trying to", "it might be difficult to \"notice\" its use. It might, therefore, be hard", "enforced would be welcome in answers if you believe they are appropriate. [Here", "generally skeptical of AI in its present form. We are, after all, trying", "generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its use could greatly", "--- Insights into how a restrictive policy might be enforced would be welcome", "is that humans also (present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual", "policy on using it? The possibilities are to forbid it, permit it with", "answers there. One major criticism of it is that it generates text that", "appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these). --- The New", "a restrictive policy might be enforced would be welcome in answers if you", "about how to recognize these). --- The New York Times has an [article", "been used for at least one answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has", "and make policy on using it? The possibilities are to forbid it, permit", "Insights into how a restrictive policy might be enforced would be welcome in", "to questions. It seems to have been used for at least one answer", "that it generates text that can be factually \"questionable\" since it depends on", "with citation, or to permit it generally. There might be others as well.", "for answers there. One major criticism of it is that it generates text", "[ChatGPT](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT) is a human assisted AI that can be used to generate reasonable", "I think its use could greatly degrade the usefulness and validity of this", "believe they are appropriate. [Here is some discussion](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421880/8209853) about how to recognize these).", "this site if it is overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical of AI", "is overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical of AI in its present form.", "reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its use could greatly degrade the", "to enforce any policy. Another problem is that humans also (present company excluded)", "greatly degrade the usefulness and validity of this site if it is overused.", "also (present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I", "one answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers", "that humans also (present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\".", "(present company excluded) sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think", "One major criticism of it is that it generates text that can be", "provide valid career guidance to our peers. --- Insights into how a restrictive", "to generate reasonable looking answers to questions. It seems to have been used", "guidance to our peers. --- Insights into how a restrictive policy might be", "it generates text that can be factually \"questionable\" since it depends on the", "It might, therefore, be hard or impossible to enforce any policy. Another problem", "if it is overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical of AI in its", "then, I'm generally skeptical of AI in its present form. We are, after", "train it, which isn't always reliable. Should we take a position and make", "for at least one answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow has (temporarily) banned", "or impossible to enforce any policy. Another problem is that humans also (present", "be welcome in answers if you believe they are appropriate. [Here is some", "human assisted AI that can be used to generate reasonable looking answers to", "be hard or impossible to enforce any policy. Another problem is that humans", "sometimes generate faulty reasoning and unfactual \"facts\". Personally, I think its use could", "all, trying to provide valid career guidance to our peers. --- Insights into", "used to train it, which isn't always reliable. Should we take a position", "usefulness and validity of this site if it is overused. But, then, I'm", "that can be used to generate reasonable looking answers to questions. It seems", "forbid it, permit it with citation, or to permit it generally. There might", "after all, trying to provide valid career guidance to our peers. --- Insights", "could greatly degrade the usefulness and validity of this site if it is", "AI in its present form. We are, after all, trying to provide valid", "overused. But, then, I'm generally skeptical of AI in its present form. We", "might, therefore, be hard or impossible to enforce any policy. Another problem is", "form. We are, after all, trying to provide valid career guidance to our", "has (temporarily) banned it](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/q/421831/8209853) for answers there. One major criticism of it is", "a position and make policy on using it? The possibilities are to forbid", "have been used for at least one answer here (now deleted). However [StackOverflow", "recognize these). --- The New York Times has an [article (probably paywalled)](https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html) concerning" ]
[ "on questions, answers, or comments that are automatically generated using a tool like", "for Academia SE community input: [Should this site take an official position on", "have a firm policy on questions, answers, or comments that are automatically generated", "See also the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned) (see also [here](https://stackoverflow.com/help/gpt-policy)) and [network wide](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/384396/ban-chatgpt-network-wide).", "take an official position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related", "post follows a previous request for Academia SE community input: [Should this site", "follows a previous request for Academia SE community input: [Should this site take", "official position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions [on", "comments that are automatically generated using a tool like GPT-3? This post follows", "by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned) (see also [here](https://stackoverflow.com/help/gpt-policy)) and", "tool like GPT-3? This post follows a previous request for Academia SE community", "on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned) (see", "position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned)", "community input: [Should this site take an official position on answers generated by", "policy on questions, answers, or comments that are automatically generated using a tool", "previous request for Academia SE community input: [Should this site take an official", "firm policy on questions, answers, or comments that are automatically generated using a", "[Should this site take an official position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See", "request for Academia SE community input: [Should this site take an official position", "ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned) (see also [here](https://stackoverflow.com/help/gpt-policy)) and [network", "Do we have a firm policy on questions, answers, or comments that are", "a previous request for Academia SE community input: [Should this site take an", "this site take an official position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also", "answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned) (see also", "like GPT-3? This post follows a previous request for Academia SE community input:", "GPT-3? This post follows a previous request for Academia SE community input: [Should", "questions, answers, or comments that are automatically generated using a tool like GPT-3?", "generated using a tool like GPT-3? This post follows a previous request for", "we have a firm policy on questions, answers, or comments that are automatically", "This post follows a previous request for Academia SE community input: [Should this", "using a tool like GPT-3? This post follows a previous request for Academia", "generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions [on StackOverflow](https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/421831/temporary-policy-chatgpt-is-banned) (see also [here](https://stackoverflow.com/help/gpt-policy))", "or comments that are automatically generated using a tool like GPT-3? This post", "a firm policy on questions, answers, or comments that are automatically generated using", "a tool like GPT-3? This post follows a previous request for Academia SE", "automatically generated using a tool like GPT-3? This post follows a previous request", "Academia SE community input: [Should this site take an official position on answers", "SE community input: [Should this site take an official position on answers generated", "that are automatically generated using a tool like GPT-3? This post follows a", "input: [Should this site take an official position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt)", "site take an official position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the", "answers, or comments that are automatically generated using a tool like GPT-3? This", "an official position on answers generated by ChatGPT?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5219/should-this-site-take-an-official-position-on-answers-generated-by-chatgpt) See also the related discussions", "are automatically generated using a tool like GPT-3? This post follows a previous" ]
[ "is closed. and is the closed question appeared on the screen for others", "Someone, please tell me why [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is the closed", "is the closed question appeared on the screen for others or not? how", "the closed question appeared on the screen for others or not? how to", "[this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is the closed question appeared on the screen", "closed. and is the closed question appeared on the screen for others or", "me why [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is the closed question appeared on", "tell me why [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is the closed question appeared", "closed question appeared on the screen for others or not? how to reopen", "please tell me why [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is the closed question", "question appeared on the screen for others or not? how to reopen it?", "question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is the closed question appeared on the screen for", "and is the closed question appeared on the screen for others or not?", "why [this question](https://academia.stackexchange.com/q/192084/75368) is closed. and is the closed question appeared on the" ]
[ "answer be? --- It's worth noting that I make a huge distinction between", "so, what should the canonical answer be? --- It's worth noting that I", "answer? If so, what should the canonical answer be? --- It's worth noting", "this is usually managed. Do we think this needs a canonical answer? If", "by which this is usually managed. Do we think this needs a canonical", "--- It's worth noting that I make a huge distinction between \"can I\"", "my opinion, have broadly the same answer, that does have some more nuance", "unaware of the process by which this is usually managed. Do we think", "questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of the process", "a rather misguided attempt to make a canonical answer for all of the", "needs a canonical answer? If so, what should the canonical answer be? ---", "If so, what should the canonical answer be? --- It's worth noting that", "in my opinion, have broadly the same answer, that does have some more", "canonical answer? If so, what should the canonical answer be? --- It's worth", "I\", this question only concerns the former. While the latter would, in my", "should the canonical answer be? --- It's worth noting that I make a", "I recently made a rather misguided attempt to make a canonical answer for", "was unaware of the process by which this is usually managed. Do we", "same answer, that does have some more nuance that would make a canonical", "a huge distinction between \"can I\" and \"should I\", this question only concerns", "latter would, in my opinion, have broadly the same answer, that does have", "this question only concerns the former. While the latter would, in my opinion,", "attempt to make a canonical answer for all of the questions that take", "would, in my opinion, have broadly the same answer, that does have some", "we think this needs a canonical answer? If so, what should the canonical", "the questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of the", "Do we think this needs a canonical answer? If so, what should the", "take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of the process by which", "a canonical answer? If so, what should the canonical answer be? --- It's", "the latter would, in my opinion, have broadly the same answer, that does", "usually managed. Do we think this needs a canonical answer? If so, what", "I make a huge distinction between \"can I\" and \"should I\", this question", "concerns the former. While the latter would, in my opinion, have broadly the", "question only concerns the former. While the latter would, in my opinion, have", "have broadly the same answer, that does have some more nuance that would", "does have some more nuance that would make a canonical answer far harder.", "misguided attempt to make a canonical answer for all of the questions that", "Apologies, I was unaware of the process by which this is usually managed.", "the same answer, that does have some more nuance that would make a", "that I make a huge distinction between \"can I\" and \"should I\", this", "answer, that does have some more nuance that would make a canonical answer", "for all of the questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was", "to make a canonical answer for all of the questions that take this", "distinction between \"can I\" and \"should I\", this question only concerns the former.", "noting that I make a huge distinction between \"can I\" and \"should I\",", "of the questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of", "broadly the same answer, that does have some more nuance that would make", "the canonical answer be? --- It's worth noting that I make a huge", "managed. Do we think this needs a canonical answer? If so, what should", "It's worth noting that I make a huge distinction between \"can I\" and", "\"can I\" and \"should I\", this question only concerns the former. While the", "I was unaware of the process by which this is usually managed. Do", "which this is usually managed. Do we think this needs a canonical answer?", "is usually managed. Do we think this needs a canonical answer? If so,", "make a huge distinction between \"can I\" and \"should I\", this question only", "I\" and \"should I\", this question only concerns the former. While the latter", "that does have some more nuance that would make a canonical answer far", "rather misguided attempt to make a canonical answer for all of the questions", "\"should I\", this question only concerns the former. While the latter would, in", "form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of the process by which this is", "make a canonical answer for all of the questions that take this form.", "what should the canonical answer be? --- It's worth noting that I make", "made a rather misguided attempt to make a canonical answer for all of", "answer for all of the questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I", "recently made a rather misguided attempt to make a canonical answer for all", "this needs a canonical answer? If so, what should the canonical answer be?", "be? --- It's worth noting that I make a huge distinction between \"can", "While the latter would, in my opinion, have broadly the same answer, that", "all of the questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of the process by which this is usually", "huge distinction between \"can I\" and \"should I\", this question only concerns the", "that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of the process by", "worth noting that I make a huge distinction between \"can I\" and \"should", "and \"should I\", this question only concerns the former. While the latter would,", "think this needs a canonical answer? If so, what should the canonical answer", "between \"can I\" and \"should I\", this question only concerns the former. While", "a canonical answer for all of the questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370>", "process by which this is usually managed. Do we think this needs a", "canonical answer be? --- It's worth noting that I make a huge distinction", "former. While the latter would, in my opinion, have broadly the same answer,", "the former. While the latter would, in my opinion, have broadly the same", "only concerns the former. While the latter would, in my opinion, have broadly", "canonical answer for all of the questions that take this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies,", "of the process by which this is usually managed. Do we think this", "this form. <https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/192370/can-i-contact-x-person-about-y?noredirect=1#comment519890_192370> Apologies, I was unaware of the process by which this", "opinion, have broadly the same answer, that does have some more nuance that", "the process by which this is usually managed. Do we think this needs" ]
[ "on the main site. And started to wonder why this question is on", "question is on meta and not as a canonical question on the main", "good and informative content from meta to the main site in the form", "meta and not as a canonical question on the main site, as it", "my question is: should we migrate (or duplicate) this good and informative content", "And started to wonder why this question is on meta and not as", "is: should we migrate (or duplicate) this good and informative content from meta", "question on the main site. And started to wonder why this question is", "in a comment on a question on the main site. And started to", "So my question is: should we migrate (or duplicate) this good and informative", "contains actually a lot of content that would be (IMHO) be better suited", "the main site and not meta. So my question is: should we migrate", "wonder why this question is on meta and not as a canonical question", "should we migrate (or duplicate) this good and informative content from meta to", "comment on a question on the main site. And started to wonder why", "differs more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment on a question", "content that would be (IMHO) be better suited for the main site and", "and not as a canonical question on the main site, as it contains", "(or duplicate) this good and informative content from meta to the main site", "that would be (IMHO) be better suited for the main site and not", "for the main site and not meta. So my question is: should we", "linked the \"[Academia differs more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment", "better suited for the main site and not meta. So my question is:", "we migrate (or duplicate) this good and informative content from meta to the", "it contains actually a lot of content that would be (IMHO) be better", "why this question is on meta and not as a canonical question on", "is on meta and not as a canonical question on the main site,", "on a question on the main site. And started to wonder why this", "than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment on a question on the", "of content that would be (IMHO) be better suited for the main site", "this question is on meta and not as a canonical question on the", "meta. So my question is: should we migrate (or duplicate) this good and", "recently linked the \"[Academia differs more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a", "meta question in a comment on a question on the main site. And", "question on the main site, as it contains actually a lot of content", "question is: should we migrate (or duplicate) this good and informative content from", "to wonder why this question is on meta and not as a canonical", "the main site, as it contains actually a lot of content that would", "content from meta to the main site in the form of a canonical", "not meta. So my question is: should we migrate (or duplicate) this good", "suited for the main site and not meta. So my question is: should", "\"[Academia differs more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment on a", "informative content from meta to the main site in the form of a", "canonical question on the main site, as it contains actually a lot of", "question in a comment on a question on the main site. And started", "as a canonical question on the main site, as it contains actually a", "on the main site, as it contains actually a lot of content that", "as it contains actually a lot of content that would be (IMHO) be", "not as a canonical question on the main site, as it contains actually", "this good and informative content from meta to the main site in the", "and informative content from meta to the main site in the form of", "(IMHO) be better suited for the main site and not meta. So my", "on meta and not as a canonical question on the main site, as", "more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment on a question on", "actually a lot of content that would be (IMHO) be better suited for", "from meta to the main site in the form of a canonical question?", "a lot of content that would be (IMHO) be better suited for the", "a question on the main site. And started to wonder why this question", "a canonical question on the main site, as it contains actually a lot", "and not meta. So my question is: should we migrate (or duplicate) this", "would be (IMHO) be better suited for the main site and not meta.", "main site, as it contains actually a lot of content that would be", "site, as it contains actually a lot of content that would be (IMHO)", "migrate (or duplicate) this good and informative content from meta to the main", "the \"[Academia differs more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment on", "I recently linked the \"[Academia differs more than you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in", "a comment on a question on the main site. And started to wonder", "main site and not meta. So my question is: should we migrate (or", "you think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment on a question on the main", "started to wonder why this question is on meta and not as a", "site and not meta. So my question is: should we migrate (or duplicate)", "think](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/4471/academia-varies-more-than-you-think-it-does-the-movie#4477)\" meta question in a comment on a question on the main site.", "lot of content that would be (IMHO) be better suited for the main", "be better suited for the main site and not meta. So my question", "be (IMHO) be better suited for the main site and not meta. So", "main site. And started to wonder why this question is on meta and", "duplicate) this good and informative content from meta to the main site in", "site. And started to wonder why this question is on meta and not", "the main site. And started to wonder why this question is on meta" ]
[ "the fact is that no one here can tell them what the status", "things vary widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do. * Close", "e-mail would be perceived. * Leave the questions open. This seems to be", "be perceived. * Leave the questions open. This seems to be the most", "thing to do. * Close the questions as \"depends on individual factors,\" since", "to be the most common outcome now. I'd be inclined toward one of", "been rejected? At what point can I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is", "can tell them what the status of their application is. It seems like", "but haven't heard back after X days / weeks / months. Have I", "/ weeks / months. Have I been rejected? At what point can I", "like we do not have a consistent policy for these; they are usually", "individual factors,\" since we cannot predict how long things will take or how", "/ months. Have I been rejected? At what point can I send a", "of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/).", "is understandable that askers are anxious, but of course the fact is that", "submitted an application / had an interview, but haven't heard back after X", "are usually left open, but occasionally closed as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\"", "fact is that no one here can tell them what the status of", "rejected? At what point can I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable", "open, but occasionally closed as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I see", "along the lines of \"I submitted an application / had an interview, but", "application / had an interview, but haven't heard back after X days /", "It is understandable that askers are anxious, but of course the fact is", "haven't heard back after X days / weeks / months. Have I been", "or \"individual factors.\" As I see it, there are three possible options: ", "question \"What is the usual hiring timeline for academic positions in the US", "on individual factors,\" since we cannot predict how long things will take or", "free to edit to improve. If more severe changes are needed, let's make", "see it, there are three possible options: Make a canonical question \"What", "closed as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I see it, there are", "is that no one here can tell them what the status of their", "open. This seems to be the most common outcome now. I'd be inclined", "the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please", "months. Have I been rejected? At what point can I send a follow-up", "do. * Close the questions as \"depends on individual factors,\" since we cannot", "of their application is. It seems like we do not have a consistent", "Why haven't I heard back?\", and the caveats about how things vary widely.", "heard back?\", and the caveats about how things vary widely. This is probably", "like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193421/timeline-to-ask-postdoc-interview-outcome) [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of \"I submitted an application / had", "cannot predict how long things will take or how a follow-up e-mail would", "perceived. * Leave the questions open. This seems to be the most common", "follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers are anxious, but of course the", "It seems like we do not have a consistent policy for these; they", "their application is. It seems like we do not have a consistent policy", "possible options: * Make a canonical question \"What is the usual hiring timeline", "Have I been rejected? At what point can I send a follow-up e-mail?\"", "after X days / weeks / months. Have I been rejected? At what", "hiring timeline for academic positions in the US and Europe? Why haven't I", "caveats about how things vary widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to", "questions as \"depends on individual factors,\" since we cannot predict how long things", "no one here can tell them what the status of their application is.", "how long things will take or how a follow-up e-mail would be perceived.", "a follow-up e-mail would be perceived. * Leave the questions open. This seems", "since we cannot predict how long things will take or how a follow-up", "\"depends on individual factors,\" since we cannot predict how long things will take", "has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit to improve. If more", "course the fact is that no one here can tell them what the", "now. I'd be inclined toward one of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A", "inclined toward one of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has", "a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I see it, there are three possible", "\"What is the usual hiring timeline for academic positions in the US and", "occasionally closed as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I see it, there", "to edit to improve. If more severe changes are needed, let's make a", "usual hiring timeline for academic positions in the US and Europe? Why haven't", "US and Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\", and the caveats about how", "improve. If more severe changes are needed, let's make a new meta post.", "of \"I submitted an application / had an interview, but haven't heard back", "usually left open, but occasionally closed as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As", "factors.\" As I see it, there are three possible options: * Make a", "is the usual hiring timeline for academic positions in the US and Europe?", "askers are anxious, but of course the fact is that no one here", "first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel", "[one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of \"I submitted an application / had an interview,", "been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit to improve. If more severe", "the US and Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\", and the caveats about", "tell them what the status of their application is. It seems like we", "consistent policy for these; they are usually left open, but occasionally closed as", "weeks / months. Have I been rejected? At what point can I send", "academic positions in the US and Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\", and", "* Close the questions as \"depends on individual factors,\" since we cannot predict", "we do not have a consistent policy for these; they are usually left", "do not have a consistent policy for these; they are usually left open,", "back after X days / weeks / months. Have I been rejected? At", "or how a follow-up e-mail would be perceived. * Leave the questions open.", "factors,\" since we cannot predict how long things will take or how a", "the usual hiring timeline for academic positions in the US and Europe? Why", "these; they are usually left open, but occasionally closed as a duplicate or", "be inclined toward one of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer", "would be perceived. * Leave the questions open. This seems to be the", "We frequently get questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193421/timeline-to-ask-postdoc-interview-outcome) [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of \"I submitted", "I been rejected? At what point can I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It", "I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers are anxious, but", "common outcome now. I'd be inclined toward one of the first two. Thoughts?", "the questions open. This seems to be the most common outcome now. I'd", "an interview, but haven't heard back after X days / weeks / months.", "policy for these; they are usually left open, but occasionally closed as a", "have a consistent policy for these; they are usually left open, but occasionally", "This seems to be the most common outcome now. I'd be inclined toward", "left open, but occasionally closed as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I", "heard back after X days / weeks / months. Have I been rejected?", "I heard back?\", and the caveats about how things vary widely. This is", "that no one here can tell them what the status of their application", "one of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been posted", "had an interview, but haven't heard back after X days / weeks /", "X days / weeks / months. Have I been rejected? At what point", "there are three possible options: * Make a canonical question \"What is the", "what point can I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers", "point can I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers are", "widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do. * Close the questions", "that askers are anxious, but of course the fact is that no one", "they are usually left open, but occasionally closed as a duplicate or \"individual", "Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit", "vary widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do. * Close the", "three possible options: * Make a canonical question \"What is the usual hiring", "but occasionally closed as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I see it,", "to improve. If more severe changes are needed, let's make a new meta", "and Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\", and the caveats about how things", "[this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193421/timeline-to-ask-postdoc-interview-outcome) [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of \"I submitted an application / had an", "get questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193421/timeline-to-ask-postdoc-interview-outcome) [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of \"I submitted an application", "a consistent policy for these; they are usually left open, but occasionally closed", "but of course the fact is that no one here can tell them", "\"friendliest\" thing to do. * Close the questions as \"depends on individual factors,\"", "how a follow-up e-mail would be perceived. * Leave the questions open. This", "Please feel free to edit to improve. If more severe changes are needed,", "one here can tell them what the status of their application is. It", "/ had an interview, but haven't heard back after X days / weeks", "anxious, but of course the fact is that no one here can tell", "At what point can I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that", "not have a consistent policy for these; they are usually left open, but", "timeline for academic positions in the US and Europe? Why haven't I heard", "understandable that askers are anxious, but of course the fact is that no", "send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers are anxious, but of", "Make a canonical question \"What is the usual hiring timeline for academic positions", "to do. * Close the questions as \"depends on individual factors,\" since we", "seems like we do not have a consistent policy for these; they are", "canonical question \"What is the usual hiring timeline for academic positions in the", "questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193421/timeline-to-ask-postdoc-interview-outcome) [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of \"I submitted an application /", "I'd be inclined toward one of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate", "lines of \"I submitted an application / had an interview, but haven't heard", "candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit to improve.", "[here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit to improve. If more severe changes are", "question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit to improve. If", "the questions as \"depends on individual factors,\" since we cannot predict how long", "the lines of \"I submitted an application / had an interview, but haven't", "and the caveats about how things vary widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\"", "seems to be the most common outcome now. I'd be inclined toward one", "two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free", "of course the fact is that no one here can tell them what", "frequently get questions like [this](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193421/timeline-to-ask-postdoc-interview-outcome) [one](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193745/assistant-professor-tenure-track-netherlands), along the lines of \"I submitted an", "haven't I heard back?\", and the caveats about how things vary widely. This", "feel free to edit to improve. If more severe changes are needed, let's", "\"individual factors.\" As I see it, there are three possible options: * Make", "I see it, there are three possible options: * Make a canonical question", "in the US and Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\", and the caveats", "is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do. * Close the questions as \"depends", "most common outcome now. I'd be inclined toward one of the first two.", "about how things vary widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do.", "application is. It seems like we do not have a consistent policy for", "the caveats about how things vary widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing", "posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit to improve. If more severe changes", "a canonical question \"What is the usual hiring timeline for academic positions in", "options: * Make a canonical question \"What is the usual hiring timeline for", "This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do. * Close the questions as", "Close the questions as \"depends on individual factors,\" since we cannot predict how", "as a duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I see it, there are three", "long things will take or how a follow-up e-mail would be perceived. ", "toward one of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been", "it, there are three possible options: Make a canonical question \"What is", "back?\", and the caveats about how things vary widely. This is probably the", "are anxious, but of course the fact is that no one here can", "status of their application is. It seems like we do not have a", "how things vary widely. This is probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do. ", "the status of their application is. It seems like we do not have", "for academic positions in the US and Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\",", "take or how a follow-up e-mail would be perceived. Leave the questions", "A candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to edit to", "days / weeks / months. Have I been rejected? At what point can", "* Make a canonical question \"What is the usual hiring timeline for academic", "edit to improve. If more severe changes are needed, let's make a new", "here can tell them what the status of their application is. It seems", "probably the \"friendliest\" thing to do. * Close the questions as \"depends on", "interview, but haven't heard back after X days / weeks / months. Have", "predict how long things will take or how a follow-up e-mail would be", "things will take or how a follow-up e-mail would be perceived. * Leave", "a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers are anxious, but of course", "Thoughts? Edit/Update: A candidate question/answer has been posted [here](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/193773/). Please feel free to", "As I see it, there are three possible options: * Make a canonical", "questions open. This seems to be the most common outcome now. I'd be", "will take or how a follow-up e-mail would be perceived. * Leave the", "Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\", and the caveats about how things vary", "\"I submitted an application / had an interview, but haven't heard back after", "the \"friendliest\" thing to do. * Close the questions as \"depends on individual", "follow-up e-mail would be perceived. * Leave the questions open. This seems to", "e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers are anxious, but of course the fact", "positions in the US and Europe? Why haven't I heard back?\", and the", "Leave the questions open. This seems to be the most common outcome now.", "outcome now. I'd be inclined toward one of the first two. Thoughts? Edit/Update:", "we cannot predict how long things will take or how a follow-up e-mail", "for these; they are usually left open, but occasionally closed as a duplicate", "as \"depends on individual factors,\" since we cannot predict how long things will", "duplicate or \"individual factors.\" As I see it, there are three possible options:", "the most common outcome now. I'd be inclined toward one of the first", "* Leave the questions open. This seems to be the most common outcome", "are three possible options: * Make a canonical question \"What is the usual", "can I send a follow-up e-mail?\" It is understandable that askers are anxious,", "an application / had an interview, but haven't heard back after X days", "be the most common outcome now. I'd be inclined toward one of the", "is. It seems like we do not have a consistent policy for these;", "them what the status of their application is. It seems like we do", "what the status of their application is. It seems like we do not" ]
[ "a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website a few weeks ago without", "different sources that give apparently conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate to ask", "not used to this website at all, so forgive me is my question", "that it's interesting to know if we can ask this kind of academia", "of international doctoral students in the US), but I have two different sources", "if it's off-topic. I'm not used to this website at all, so forgive", "about getting data, but rather about understanding why sources are conflicting on this", "forgive me is my question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did", "Anyway, besides my particular question, I guess that it's interesting to know if", "be appropriate to ask a question about it on this website? I asked", "US), but I have two different sources that give apparently conflicting figures. Would", "wondering if the academia website would be more appropriate for this question, as", "of academia figures/statistics question here, or if it's off-topic. I'm not used to", "two different sources that give apparently conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate to", "things for me, even if the \"vibe\" I get from them is that", "it's interesting to know if we can ask this kind of academia figures/statistics", "To give some context, I have a quite simple question (i.e. the number", "\"vibe\" I get from them is that this kind of question would be", "bottom-line issue is not strictly about getting data, but rather about understanding why", "about understanding why sources are conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides my particular", "subject. Anyway, besides my particular question, I guess that it's interesting to know", "guess that it's interesting to know if we can ask this kind of", "website would be more appropriate for this question, as the bottom-line issue is", "clarify things for me, even if the \"vibe\" I get from them is", "understanding why sources are conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides my particular question,", "for me, even if the \"vibe\" I get from them is that this", "this website at all, so forgive me is my question is ignorant. The", "this kind of academia figures/statistics question here, or if it's off-topic. I'm not", "me, even if the \"vibe\" I get from them is that this kind", "give apparently conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate to ask a question about", "on this subject. Anyway, besides my particular question, I guess that it's interesting", "appropriate to ask a question about it on this website? I asked a", "website a few weeks ago without getting answers. But now I'm wondering if", "I guess that it's interesting to know if we can ask this kind", "is my question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really", "on this website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website", "to this website at all, so forgive me is my question is ignorant.", "about it on this website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata", "But now I'm wondering if the academia website would be more appropriate for", "sources are conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides my particular question, I guess", "it be appropriate to ask a question about it on this website? I", "off-topic. I'm not used to this website at all, so forgive me is", "website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website a few", "sources that give apparently conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate to ask a", "for this question, as the bottom-line issue is not strictly about getting data,", "particular question, I guess that it's interesting to know if we can ask", "here, or if it's off-topic. I'm not used to this website at all,", "why sources are conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides my particular question, I", "conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides my particular question, I guess that it's", "doctoral students in the US), but I have two different sources that give", "if we can ask this kind of academia figures/statistics question here, or if", "but I have two different sources that give apparently conflicting figures. Would it", "that give apparently conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate to ask a question", "I have a quite simple question (i.e. the number of international doctoral students", "I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website a few weeks", "used to this website at all, so forgive me is my question is", "getting answers. But now I'm wondering if the academia website would be more", "to know if we can ask this kind of academia figures/statistics question here,", "figures. Would it be appropriate to ask a question about it on this", "have two different sources that give apparently conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things for me, even if the", "besides my particular question, I guess that it's interesting to know if we", "on the opendata stackexchange website a few weeks ago without getting answers. But", "students in the US), but I have two different sources that give apparently", "the opendata stackexchange website a few weeks ago without getting answers. But now", "my particular question, I guess that it's interesting to know if we can", "Would it be appropriate to ask a question about it on this website?", "to ask a question about it on this website? I asked a [similar", "I get from them is that this kind of question would be off-topic.", "would be more appropriate for this question, as the bottom-line issue is not", "number of international doctoral students in the US), but I have two different", "all, so forgive me is my question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and", "ask a question about it on this website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the)", "website at all, so forgive me is my question is ignorant. The pages", "conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate to ask a question about it on", "weeks ago without getting answers. But now I'm wondering if the academia website", "the bottom-line issue is not strictly about getting data, but rather about understanding", "apparently conflicting figures. Would it be appropriate to ask a question about it", "appropriate for this question, as the bottom-line issue is not strictly about getting", "we can ask this kind of academia figures/statistics question here, or if it's", "a quite simple question (i.e. the number of international doctoral students in the", "at all, so forgive me is my question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic>", "a question about it on this website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on", "question (i.e. the number of international doctoral students in the US), but I", "the number of international doctoral students in the US), but I have two", "[similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website a few weeks ago without getting", "the US), but I have two different sources that give apparently conflicting figures.", "and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things for me, even if the \"vibe\"", "have a quite simple question (i.e. the number of international doctoral students in", "now I'm wondering if the academia website would be more appropriate for this", "opendata stackexchange website a few weeks ago without getting answers. But now I'm", "be more appropriate for this question, as the bottom-line issue is not strictly", "question about it on this website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the", "academia website would be more appropriate for this question, as the bottom-line issue", "it's off-topic. I'm not used to this website at all, so forgive me", "I'm not used to this website at all, so forgive me is my", "so forgive me is my question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask>", "I have two different sources that give apparently conflicting figures. Would it be", "did not really clarify things for me, even if the \"vibe\" I get", "are conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides my particular question, I guess that", "getting data, but rather about understanding why sources are conflicting on this subject.", "pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things for me, even if", "this question, as the bottom-line issue is not strictly about getting data, but", "ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things for me,", "is not strictly about getting data, but rather about understanding why sources are", "question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website a few weeks ago without getting answers.", "asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website a few weeks ago", "ask this kind of academia figures/statistics question here, or if it's off-topic. I'm", "really clarify things for me, even if the \"vibe\" I get from them", "few weeks ago without getting answers. But now I'm wondering if the academia", "a few weeks ago without getting answers. But now I'm wondering if the", "can ask this kind of academia figures/statistics question here, or if it's off-topic.", "context, I have a quite simple question (i.e. the number of international doctoral", "this website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange website a", "this subject. Anyway, besides my particular question, I guess that it's interesting to", "kind of academia figures/statistics question here, or if it's off-topic. I'm not used", "question here, or if it's off-topic. I'm not used to this website at", "even if the \"vibe\" I get from them is that this kind of", "ago without getting answers. But now I'm wondering if the academia website would", "it on this website? I asked a [similar question](https://opendata.stackexchange.com/questions/20869/where-to-find-more-detailed-data-relative-to-doctoral-students-registered-in-the) on the opendata stackexchange", "my question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify", "stackexchange website a few weeks ago without getting answers. But now I'm wondering", "the academia website would be more appropriate for this question, as the bottom-line", "issue is not strictly about getting data, but rather about understanding why sources", "without getting answers. But now I'm wondering if the academia website would be", "interesting to know if we can ask this kind of academia figures/statistics question", "(i.e. the number of international doctoral students in the US), but I have", "know if we can ask this kind of academia figures/statistics question here, or", "<https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things for me, even if the \"vibe\" I", "strictly about getting data, but rather about understanding why sources are conflicting on", "me is my question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not", "not strictly about getting data, but rather about understanding why sources are conflicting", "academia figures/statistics question here, or if it's off-topic. I'm not used to this", "figures/statistics question here, or if it's off-topic. I'm not used to this website", "if the academia website would be more appropriate for this question, as the", "answers. But now I'm wondering if the academia website would be more appropriate", "data, but rather about understanding why sources are conflicting on this subject. Anyway,", "The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things for me, even", "get from them is that this kind of question would be off-topic. Thanks,", "more appropriate for this question, as the bottom-line issue is not strictly about", "or if it's off-topic. I'm not used to this website at all, so", "question is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things", "not really clarify things for me, even if the \"vibe\" I get from", "if the \"vibe\" I get from them is that this kind of question", "question, I guess that it's interesting to know if we can ask this", "simple question (i.e. the number of international doctoral students in the US), but", "I'm wondering if the academia website would be more appropriate for this question,", "the \"vibe\" I get from them is that this kind of question would", "rather about understanding why sources are conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides my", "international doctoral students in the US), but I have two different sources that", "quite simple question (i.e. the number of international doctoral students in the US),", "in the US), but I have two different sources that give apparently conflicting", "give some context, I have a quite simple question (i.e. the number of", "question, as the bottom-line issue is not strictly about getting data, but rather", "some context, I have a quite simple question (i.e. the number of international", "as the bottom-line issue is not strictly about getting data, but rather about", "is ignorant. The pages <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic> and <https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask> did not really clarify things for", "but rather about understanding why sources are conflicting on this subject. Anyway, besides" ]
[ "include separate sections with comments that are domain specific * Close the questions", "of physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include", "to those questions (of which I've seen several) which, at a first glance,", "include other domains. The questions usually involve one or more of the following", "been an unusual spate of questions on Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\"", "of looking at the topic of interest. 2. A description of the paucity", "fame (nomination for a prize of award of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption", "the main problems. Such an answer might include separate sections with comments that", "to the lack of time the author has had to pursue a mundane", "a degree awarding institution. 3. One or more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or", "genius\" theme. I'm not going to highlight any particular post but the bulk", "award of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my theories into mainstream physics,", "to have been an unusual spate of questions on Academia with a similar", "a revolutionary new way of looking at the topic of interest. 2. A", "2. A description of the paucity of their own academic training or credentials", "(employment as a senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize of", "the revolutionary theory, or due to bias on the part of a degree", "or due to bias on the part of a degree awarding institution. 3.", "leverage or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles the OP has faced.", "also cater to those questions (of which I've seen several) which, at a", "closed for want of clarity... but I'm wondering whether it would be more", "widespread recognition (adoption of my theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological", "towards a useful generic answer and the OP would be given clear information", "time the author has had to pursue a mundane academic career while working", "view already has, produced a revolutionary new way of looking at the topic", "spate of questions on Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not", "to: * Produce a community answer of the kind that I've seen elsewhere,", "own academic training or credentials usually due to the lack of time the", "The second of the points above would also cater to those questions (of", "seems to have been an unusual spate of questions on Academia with a", "some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics,", "following things: 1. A statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent work that would,", "researcher's unappreciated independent work that would, could, or in their view already has,", "a non-duplicate. The second of the points above would also cater to those", "the researcher's unappreciated independent work that would, could, or in their view already", "advantages of doing that would be that all similar questions were ultimately directed", "mundane academic career while working on the revolutionary theory, or due to bias", "clear information about how their question would have to be improved before it", "be improved before it could be reopened as a non-duplicate. The second of", "highlight any particular post but the bulk of them relate to fields of", "for money (employment as a senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a", "at a first glance, appear to be like those I've described but turn", "has had to pursue a mundane academic career while working on the revolutionary", "question would have to be improved before it could be reopened as a", "to be improved before it could be reopened as a non-duplicate. The second", "or more of the following things: 1. A statement about the researcher's unappreciated", "5. A request for suggestions about how to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage", "faced. Ultimately, most of the posts get closed for want of clarity... but", "given clear information about how their question would have to be improved before", "glance, appear to be like those I've described *but turn out not to", "bulk of them relate to fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity),", "that all similar questions were ultimately directed towards a useful generic answer and", "that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the main problems. Such an answer might", "a useful generic answer and the OP would be given clear information about", "others into overcoming the hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately, most of the", "requiring clarification. The advantages of doing that would be that all similar questions", "relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include other domains. The questions usually involve", "hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately, most of the posts get closed for", "unusual spate of questions on Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm", "as being duplicates, rather than as merely requiring clarification. The advantages of doing", "fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally", "domains. The questions usually involve one or more of the following things: 1.", "to bias on the part of a degree awarding institution. 3. One or", "of a degree awarding institution. 3. One or more self-publications, predatory journal publications,", "desire for money (employment as a senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for", "questions (of which I've seen several) which, at a first glance, appear to", "several) which, at a first glance, appear to be like those I've described", "questions usually involve one or more of the following things: 1. A statement", "how to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming", "A description of the paucity of their own academic training or credentials usually", "whether it would be more useful* to: * Produce a community answer of", "the questions as being *duplicates, rather than as merely requiring clarification. The advantages", "has, produced a revolutionary new way of looking at the topic of interest.", "I'm not going to highlight any particular post but the bulk of them", "similar questions were ultimately directed towards a useful generic answer and the OP", "relate to fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics,", "I'm wondering whether it would be more useful* to: * Produce a community", "kind that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the main problems. Such an answer", "due to the lack of time the author has had to pursue a", "about how to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others into", "but occasionally include other domains. The questions usually involve one or more of", "prize of award of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my theories into", "first glance, appear to be like those I've described but turn out not", "career while working on the revolutionary theory, or due to bias on the", "awarding institution. 3. One or more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos.", "to pursue a mundane academic career while working on the revolutionary theory, or", "the topic of interest. 2. A description of the paucity of their own", "quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include other domains. The", "topic of interest. 2. A description of the paucity of their own academic", "to fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but", "questions on Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going to", "similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going to highlight any particular post but", "my theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A request", "bias on the part of a degree awarding institution. 3. One or more", "senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize of award of some", "working on the revolutionary theory, or due to bias on the part of", "already has, produced a revolutionary new way of looking at the topic of", "their view already has, produced a revolutionary new way of looking at the", "the following things: 1. A statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent work that", "community answer of the kind that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the main", "of the points above would also cater to those questions (of which I've", "a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going to highlight any particular post", "training or credentials usually due to the lack of time the author has", "Produce a community answer of the kind that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses", "not going to highlight any particular post but the bulk of them relate", "or credentials usually due to the lack of time the author has had", "sections with comments that are domain specific Close the questions as being", "* Produce a community answer of the kind that I've seen elsewhere, that", "directed towards a useful generic answer and the OP would be given clear", "mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A request for suggestions about", "paucity of their own academic training or credentials usually due to the lack", "(of which I've seen several) which, at a first glance, appear to be", "force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles", "than as merely requiring clarification. The advantages of doing that would be that", "a first glance, appear to be like those I've described but turn out", "reopened as a non-duplicate. The second of the points above would also cater", "the lack of time the author has had to pursue a mundane academic", "on the part of a degree awarding institution. 3. One or more self-publications,", "manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately, most of", "usually involve one or more of the following things: 1. A statement about", "new way of looking at the topic of interest. 2. A description of", "non-duplicate. The second of the points above would also cater to those questions", "but the bulk of them relate to fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics", "suggestions about how to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others", "has faced. Ultimately, most of the posts get closed for want of clarity...", "of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my theories into mainstream physics, medical,", "theory, or due to bias on the part of a degree awarding institution.", "otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately, most", "Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going to highlight any", "I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the main problems. Such an answer might include", "(adoption of my theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5.", "the points above would also cater to those questions (of which I've seen", "Close the questions as being duplicates*, rather than as merely requiring clarification. The", "or more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A desire for", "could be reopened as a non-duplicate. The second of the points above would", "the kind that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the main problems. Such an", "I've seen several) which, at a first glance, appear to be like those", "and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include other domains. The questions usually", "mathematics, but occasionally include other domains. The questions usually involve one or more", "overcoming the hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately, most of the posts get", "about the researcher's unappreciated independent work that would, could, or in their view", "be given clear information about how their question would have to be improved", "merely requiring clarification. The advantages of doing that would be that all similar", "to highlight any particular post but the bulk of them relate to fields", "and mathematics, but occasionally include other domains. The questions usually involve one or", "due to bias on the part of a degree awarding institution. 3. One", "get closed for want of clarity... but I'm wondering whether it would be", "academic training or credentials usually due to the lack of time the author", "comments that are domain specific * Close the questions as being *duplicates, rather", "their question would have to be improved before it could be reopened as", "A statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent work that would, could, or in", "the bulk of them relate to fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics and", "theme. I'm not going to highlight any particular post but the bulk of", "particular post but the bulk of them relate to fields of physics (especially", "research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize of award of some kind),", "practice). 5. A request for suggestions about how to force, coerce, convince, bribe,", "would be that all similar questions were ultimately directed towards a useful generic", "\"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going to highlight any particular post but the", "way of looking at the topic of interest. 2. A description of the", "that addresses the main problems. Such an answer might include separate sections with", "could, or in their view already has, produced a revolutionary new way of", "doing that would be that all similar questions were ultimately directed towards a", "things: 1. A statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent work that would, could,", "or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately,", "be that all similar questions were ultimately directed towards a useful generic answer", "useful* to: * Produce a community answer of the kind that I've seen", "recognition (adoption of my theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice).", "addresses the main problems. Such an answer might include separate sections with comments", "or in their view already has, produced a revolutionary new way of looking", "The advantages of doing that would be that all similar questions were ultimately", "main problems. Such an answer might include separate sections with comments that are", "convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles the OP", "about how their question would have to be improved before it could be", "the posts get closed for want of clarity... but I'm wondering whether it", "A request for suggestions about how to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or", "how their question would have to be improved before it could be reopened", "medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A request for suggestions about how to", "which I've seen several) which, at a first glance, appear to be like", "would, could, or in their view already has, produced a revolutionary new way", "one or more of the following things: 1. A statement about the researcher's", "(nomination for a prize of award of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of", "money (employment as a senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize", "independent work that would, could, or in their view already has, produced a", "work that would, could, or in their view already has, produced a revolutionary", "a mundane academic career while working on the revolutionary theory, or due to", "of the posts get closed for want of clarity... but I'm wondering whether", "in their view already has, produced a revolutionary new way of looking at", "looking at the topic of interest. 2. A description of the paucity of", "the paucity of their own academic training or credentials usually due to the", "with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going to highlight any particular", "author has had to pursue a mundane academic career while working on the", "their own academic training or credentials usually due to the lack of time", "separate sections with comments that are domain specific Close the questions as", "of questions on Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going", "at the topic of interest. 2. A description of the paucity of their", "have been an unusual spate of questions on Academia with a similar \"unsung", "other domains. The questions usually involve one or more of the following things:", "A desire for money (employment as a senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination", "clarity... but I'm wondering whether it would be more *useful* to: * Produce", "1. A statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent work that would, could, or", "of them relate to fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology,", "(especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include other domains.", "of their own academic training or credentials usually due to the lack of", "points above would also cater to those questions (of which I've seen several)", "are domain specific * Close the questions as being *duplicates, rather than as", "answer might include separate sections with comments that are domain specific Close", "physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A request for suggestions about how", "description of the paucity of their own academic training or credentials usually due", "OP would be given clear information about how their question would have to", "be more *useful* to: * Produce a community answer of the kind that", "more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A desire for money", "into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A request for suggestions", "on Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme. I'm not going to highlight", "coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles the", "revolutionary theory, or due to bias on the part of a degree awarding", "self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A desire for money (employment", "answer and the OP would be given clear information about how their question", "problems. Such an answer might include separate sections with comments that are domain", "specific * Close the questions as being *duplicates, rather than as merely requiring", "be reopened as a non-duplicate. The second of the points above would also", "director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize of award of some kind), widespread", "interest. 2. A description of the paucity of their own academic training or", "or YouTube videos. 4. A desire for money (employment as a senior research", "unappreciated independent work that would, could, or in their view already has, produced", "involve one or more of the following things: 1. A statement about the", "that would be that all similar questions were ultimately directed towards a useful", "would have to be improved before it could be reopened as a non-duplicate.", "would also cater to those questions (of which I've seen several) which, at", "produced a revolutionary new way of looking at the topic of interest. 2.", "institution. 3. One or more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4.", "of time the author has had to pursue a mundane academic career while", "have to be improved before it could be reopened as a non-duplicate. The", "occasionally include other domains. The questions usually involve one or more of the", "of the paucity of their own academic training or credentials usually due to", "second of the points above would also cater to those questions (of which", "above would also cater to those questions (of which I've seen several) which,", "for want of clarity... but I'm wondering whether it would be more *useful", "into overcoming the hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately, most of the posts", "before it could be reopened as a non-duplicate. The second of the points", "answer of the kind that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the main problems.", "usually due to the lack of time the author has had to pursue", "questions as being duplicates, rather than as merely requiring clarification. The advantages of", "of clarity... but I'm wondering whether it would be more useful* to: ", "would be more useful* to: * Produce a community answer of the kind", "There seems to have been an unusual spate of questions on Academia with", "elsewhere, that addresses the main problems. Such an answer might include separate sections", "were ultimately directed towards a useful generic answer and the OP would be", "questions were ultimately directed towards a useful generic answer and the OP would", "information about how their question would have to be improved before it could", "as a non-duplicate. The second of the points above would also cater to", "the hurdles the OP has faced. Ultimately, most of the posts get closed", "OP has faced. Ultimately, most of the posts get closed for want of", "improved before it could be reopened as a non-duplicate. The second of the", "with comments that are domain specific * Close the questions as being *duplicates,", "being duplicates, rather than as merely requiring clarification. The advantages of doing that", "cater to those questions (of which I've seen several) which, at a first", "as a senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize of award", "statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent work that would, could, or in their", "posts get closed for want of clarity... but I'm wondering whether it would", "duplicates, rather than as merely requiring clarification. The advantages of doing that would", "publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A desire for money (employment as a senior", "more useful* to: * Produce a community answer of the kind that I've", "pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize of award of some kind), widespread recognition", "Ultimately, most of the posts get closed for want of clarity... but I'm", "of award of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my theories into mainstream", "while working on the revolutionary theory, or due to bias on the part", "YouTube videos. 4. A desire for money (employment as a senior research director),", "for suggestions about how to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate", "an unusual spate of questions on Academia with a similar \"unsung genius\" theme.", "kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or", "mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include other domains. The questions", "and the OP would be given clear information about how their question would", "to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the", "it could be reopened as a non-duplicate. The second of the points above", "for a prize of award of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my", "videos. 4. A desire for money (employment as a senior research director), pinnacle", "appear to be like those I've described but turn out not to be*.", "mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A request for suggestions about how to force,", "pursue a mundane academic career while working on the revolutionary theory, or due", "them relate to fields of physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and", "would be given clear information about how their question would have to be", "seen elsewhere, that addresses the main problems. Such an answer might include separate", "of the kind that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the main problems. Such", "or psychological practice). 5. A request for suggestions about how to force, coerce,", "the part of a degree awarding institution. 3. One or more self-publications, predatory", "degree awarding institution. 3. One or more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube", "any particular post but the bulk of them relate to fields of physics", "post but the bulk of them relate to fields of physics (especially quantum", "theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A request for", "that are domain specific Close the questions as being *duplicates, rather than", "rather than as merely requiring clarification. The advantages of doing that would be", "useful generic answer and the OP would be given clear information about how", " Close the questions as being *duplicates, rather than as merely requiring clarification.", "of my theories into mainstream physics, medical, mathematics, or psychological practice). 5. A", "domain specific Close the questions as being *duplicates, rather than as merely", "seen several) which, at a first glance, appear to be like those I've", "request for suggestions about how to force, coerce, convince, bribe, leverage or otherwise", "generic answer and the OP would be given clear information about how their", "predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A desire for money (employment as", "it would be more *useful* to: * Produce a community answer of the", "all similar questions were ultimately directed towards a useful generic answer and the", "those questions (of which I've seen several) which, at a first glance, appear", "physics (especially quantum mechanics and relativity), psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include other", "academic career while working on the revolutionary theory, or due to bias on", "a prize of award of some kind), widespread recognition (adoption of my theories", "most of the posts get closed for want of clarity... but I'm wondering", "wondering whether it would be more useful* to: * Produce a community answer", "3. One or more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A", "the OP has faced. Ultimately, most of the posts get closed for want", "Such an answer might include separate sections with comments that are domain specific", "clarification. The advantages of doing that would be that all similar questions were", "the author has had to pursue a mundane academic career while working on", "journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A desire for money (employment as a", "lack of time the author has had to pursue a mundane academic career", "psychological practice). 5. A request for suggestions about how to force, coerce, convince,", "want of clarity... but I'm wondering whether it would be more useful* to:", "part of a degree awarding institution. 3. One or more self-publications, predatory journal", "One or more self-publications, predatory journal publications, or YouTube videos. 4. A desire", "of the following things: 1. A statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent work", "which, at a first glance, appear to be like those I've described but", "that would, could, or in their view already has, produced a revolutionary new", "bribe, leverage or otherwise manipulate others into overcoming the hurdles the OP has", "of doing that would be that all similar questions were ultimately directed towards", "revolutionary new way of looking at the topic of interest. 2. A description", "might include separate sections with comments that are domain specific Close the", "more of the following things: 1. A statement about the researcher's unappreciated independent", "credentials usually due to the lack of time the author has had to", "going to highlight any particular post but the bulk of them relate to", "on the revolutionary theory, or due to bias on the part of a", "but I'm wondering whether it would be more *useful* to: * Produce a", "an answer might include separate sections with comments that are domain specific ", "the OP would be given clear information about how their question would have", "a senior research director), pinnacle fame (nomination for a prize of award of", "a community answer of the kind that I've seen elsewhere, that addresses the", "as merely requiring clarification*. The advantages of doing that would be that all", "of interest. 2. A description of the paucity of their own academic training", "ultimately directed towards a useful generic answer and the OP would be given", "4. A desire for money (employment as a senior research director), pinnacle fame", "psychology, and mathematics, but occasionally include other domains. The questions usually involve one", "had to pursue a mundane academic career while working on the revolutionary theory,", "The questions usually involve one or more of the following things: 1. A" ]
[ "instead of paperwork. In the few other instances where it kind of makes", "In the few other instances where it kind of makes sense, it is", "am unsure if that tag really makes sense to keep. In many instances", "delete the tag b) remove the tag from the questions where it is", "(again IMHO) not really necessary. Should we a) delete the tag b) remove", "tag from the questions where it is used incorrectly and see if it", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and I am unsure if that", "see if it is worth keeping for the rest of the questions? c)", "when reviewing a question and I am unsure if that tag really makes", "keeping for the rest of the questions? c) leave everything as it is?", "it kind of makes sense, it is (again IMHO) not really necessary. Should", "the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and I", "of paperwork. In the few other instances where it kind of makes sense,", "it is (again IMHO) not really necessary. Should we a) delete the tag", "misused for questions related to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In the few", "of makes sense, it is (again IMHO) not really necessary. Should we a)", "stumbled upon the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question", "'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and I am unsure if that tag really", "questions where it is used incorrectly and see if it is worth keeping", "where it kind of makes sense, it is (again IMHO) not really necessary.", "sense, it is (again IMHO) not really necessary. Should we a) delete the", "(scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In the few other instances where it kind", "worth keeping for the rest of the questions? c) leave everything as it", "sense to keep. In many instances the tag is (IMHO) misused for questions", "keep. In many instances the tag is (IMHO) misused for questions related to", "the tag b) remove the tag from the questions where it is used", "it is worth keeping for the rest of the questions? c) leave everything", "the questions where it is used incorrectly and see if it is worth", "makes sense, it is (again IMHO) not really necessary. Should we a) delete", "really necessary. Should we a) delete the tag b) remove the tag from", "instances where it kind of makes sense, it is (again IMHO) not really", "tag really makes sense to keep. In many instances the tag is (IMHO)", "is (IMHO) misused for questions related to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In", "upon the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and", "is used incorrectly and see if it is worth keeping for the rest", "I just stumbled upon the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing", "is worth keeping for the rest of the questions? c) leave everything as", "if it is worth keeping for the rest of the questions? c) leave", "just stumbled upon the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a", "tag b) remove the tag from the questions where it is used incorrectly", "for questions related to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In the few other", "kind of makes sense, it is (again IMHO) not really necessary. Should we", "really makes sense to keep. In many instances the tag is (IMHO) misused", "to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In the few other instances where it", "unsure if that tag really makes sense to keep. In many instances the", "(IMHO) misused for questions related to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In the", "tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and I am unsure if that tag", "papers instead of paperwork. In the few other instances where it kind of", "from the questions where it is used incorrectly and see if it is", "tag is (IMHO) misused for questions related to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork.", "reviewing a question and I am unsure if that tag really makes sense", "related to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In the few other instances where", "a) delete the tag b) remove the tag from the questions where it", "paperwork. In the few other instances where it kind of makes sense, it", "the tag from the questions where it is used incorrectly and see if", "and see if it is worth keeping for the rest of the questions?", "that tag really makes sense to keep. In many instances the tag is", "where it is used incorrectly and see if it is worth keeping for", "and I am unsure if that tag really makes sense to keep. In", "tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and I am", "not really necessary. Should we a) delete the tag b) remove the tag", "In many instances the tag is (IMHO) misused for questions related to (scientific)", "to keep. In many instances the tag is (IMHO) misused for questions related", "other instances where it kind of makes sense, it is (again IMHO) not", "many instances the tag is (IMHO) misused for questions related to (scientific) papers", "Should we a) delete the tag b) remove the tag from the questions", "it is used incorrectly and see if it is worth keeping for the", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and I am unsure", "a question and I am unsure if that tag really makes sense to", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") when reviewing a question and I am unsure if", "necessary. Should we a) delete the tag b) remove the tag from the", "questions related to (scientific) papers instead of paperwork. In the few other instances", "question and I am unsure if that tag really makes sense to keep.", "used incorrectly and see if it is worth keeping for the rest of", "instances the tag is (IMHO) misused for questions related to (scientific) papers instead", "remove the tag from the questions where it is used incorrectly and see", "b) remove the tag from the questions where it is used incorrectly and", "incorrectly and see if it is worth keeping for the rest of the", "IMHO) not really necessary. Should we a) delete the tag b) remove the", "if that tag really makes sense to keep. In many instances the tag", "the tag is (IMHO) misused for questions related to (scientific) papers instead of", "we a) delete the tag b) remove the tag from the questions where", "I am unsure if that tag really makes sense to keep. In many", "is (again IMHO) not really necessary. Should we a) delete the tag b)", "few other instances where it kind of makes sense, it is (again IMHO)", "makes sense to keep. In many instances the tag is (IMHO) misused for", "the few other instances where it kind of makes sense, it is (again" ]
[ "well. On top of that, I noticed there are quite of few questions", "top of that, I noticed there are quite of few questions about structuring", "tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from", "tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the", "am unable to find a suitable, succinct phrase for such a tag as", "and other questions as well. I suggest the follwing: change the name of", "the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag would fit well.", "good tag that fits. I propose to create a new tag for that", "of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions", "paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\")", "'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the heart of said paperwork, also there are", "where the tag was misused I had a look at the remaing questions", "new tag for that but I am unable to find a suitable, succinct", "files, paper, bibliography etc. that do not really have a good tag that", "tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag was misused I had a look", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag was misused I", "the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "the follwing: change the name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "for that but I am unable to find a suitable, succinct phrase for", "tag that fits. I propose to create a new tag for that but", "the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag was", "paper, bibliography etc. that do not really have a good tag that fits.", "name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show", "change the name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to", "remaing questions and other questions as well. I suggest the follwing: change the", "well. I suggest the follwing: change the name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork", "about structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that do not really have", "lies at the heart of said paperwork, also there are several other questions", "noticed there are quite of few questions about structuring and organizing files, paper,", "'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the heart", "fit well. Of course the wiki entry would have to be slightly changed", "said paperwork, also there are several other questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork", "few questions about structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that do not", "several other questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where", "I propose to create a new tag for that but I am unable", "structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that do not really have a", "the name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy", "well. Of course the wiki entry would have to be slightly changed as", "as well. On top of that, I noticed there are quite of few", "bibliography etc. that do not really have a good tag that fits. I", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag was misused I had a", "at the heart of said paperwork, also there are several other questions not", "unable to find a suitable, succinct phrase for such a tag as \"organizing\"", "really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions", "questions as well. I suggest the follwing: change the name of the tag", "[bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the heart of said", "do not really have a good tag that fits. I propose to create", "a suitable, succinct phrase for such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit", "questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the heart of said paperwork, also", "a good tag that fits. I propose to create a new tag for", "that fits. I propose to create a new tag for that but I", "the tag was misused I had a look at the remaing questions and", "are quite of few questions about structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc.", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies", "of said paperwork, also there are several other questions not previously in the", "for such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%. What do you", "there are several other questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "phrase for such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%. What do", "look at the remaing questions and other questions as well. I suggest the", "as that lies at the heart of said paperwork, also there are several", "I noticed there are quite of few questions about structuring and organizing files,", "the wiki entry would have to be slightly changed as well. On top", "previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag would", "After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the", "a tag would fit well. Of course the wiki entry would have to", "not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag", "'paperwork'\") where such a tag would fit well. Of course the wiki entry", "questions where the tag was misused I had a look at the remaing", "fits. I propose to create a new tag for that but I am", "paperwork, also there are several other questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show", "of few questions about structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that do", "succinct phrase for such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%. What", "that, I noticed there are quite of few questions about structuring and organizing", "a look at the remaing questions and other questions as well. I suggest", "tag for that but I am unable to find a suitable, succinct phrase", "have to be slightly changed as well. On top of that, I noticed", "other questions as well. I suggest the follwing: change the name of the", "tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%. What do you think of this", "such a tag would fit well. Of course the wiki entry would have", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag would fit well. Of", "would have to be slightly changed as well. On top of that, I", "such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%. What do you think", "to be slightly changed as well. On top of that, I noticed there", "'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag was misused I had a look at", "entry would have to be slightly changed as well. On top of that,", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag would fit well. Of course", "to: [Is the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show", "quite of few questions about structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that", "of that, I noticed there are quite of few questions about structuring and", "I am unable to find a suitable, succinct phrase for such a tag", "there are quite of few questions about structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography", "questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a", "at the remaing questions and other questions as well. I suggest the follwing:", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that", "have a good tag that fits. I propose to create a new tag", "would fit well. Of course the wiki entry would have to be slightly", "On top of that, I noticed there are quite of few questions about", "etc. that do not really have a good tag that fits. I propose", "misused I had a look at the remaing questions and other questions as", "to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the heart of", "a new tag for that but I am unable to find a suitable,", "also there are several other questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions", "questions and other questions as well. I suggest the follwing: change the name", "a follow-up to: [Is the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag", "This is a follow-up to: [Is the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing", "\"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the heart of said paperwork,", "be slightly changed as well. On top of that, I noticed there are", "organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that do not really have a good tag", "from questions where the tag was misused I had a look at the", "the heart of said paperwork, also there are several other questions not previously", "suitable, succinct phrase for such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%.", "I had a look at the remaing questions and other questions as well.", "but I am unable to find a suitable, succinct phrase for such a", "wiki entry would have to be slightly changed as well. On top of", "suggest the follwing: change the name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag was misused I had", "create a new tag for that but I am unable to find a", "to create a new tag for that but I am unable to find", "changed as well. On top of that, I noticed there are quite of", "tag would fit well. Of course the wiki entry would have to be", "find a suitable, succinct phrase for such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really", "is a follow-up to: [Is the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the", "are several other questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\")", "where such a tag would fit well. Of course the wiki entry would", "tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\")", "from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as", "[Is the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions", "was misused I had a look at the remaing questions and other questions", "that lies at the heart of said paperwork, also there are several other", "to find a suitable, succinct phrase for such a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't", "in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag would fit", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag would fit well. Of course the", "follwing: change the name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\")", "tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag was misused", "removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where the tag", "tagged 'paperwork'\") where such a tag would fit well. Of course the wiki", "Of course the wiki entry would have to be slightly changed as well.", "that but I am unable to find a suitable, succinct phrase for such", "as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%. What do you think of this proposal?", "heart of said paperwork, also there are several other questions not previously in", "slightly changed as well. On top of that, I noticed there are quite", "really have a good tag that fits. I propose to create a new", "and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that do not really have a good", "I suggest the follwing: change the name of the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show", "propose to create a new tag for that but I am unable to", "as well. I suggest the follwing: change the name of the tag from", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at", "questions about structuring and organizing files, paper, bibliography etc. that do not really", "the tag from [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") to [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged", "tag was misused I had a look at the remaing questions and other", "tagged 'bureaucracy'\") as that lies at the heart of said paperwork, also there", "that do not really have a good tag that fits. I propose to", "other questions not previously in the [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") where such", "course the wiki entry would have to be slightly changed as well. On", "necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") from questions where", "follow-up to: [Is the paperwork tag really necessary?](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5271/tag-cleanup-is-the-paperwork-tag-really-necessary?cb=1) After removing the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork", "the remaing questions and other questions as well. I suggest the follwing: change", "a tag as \"organizing\" doesn't really fit 100%. What do you think of", "had a look at the remaing questions and other questions as well. I", "not really have a good tag that fits. I propose to create a" ]
[ "OK name for that - please suggest different names if you can think", "where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show", "guess it can be deleted. As per my suggestion to create a new", "would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also are", "questions, but as every one of them is slightly different I thought it", "with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also are about administration", "of them where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as", "administration issues, so I think that is a good alternative. There is now", "[administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also are about administration issues,", "with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of", "about administration issues, so I think that is a good alternative. There is", "to create a new one. I have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show", "I thought it best to create a new one. I have now deleted", "tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I retagged some of them where bureaucracy", "I retagged some of them where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions", "try to retag the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\")", "the series of questions, but as every one of them is slightly different", "the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is an", "for the series of questions, but as every one of them is slightly", "a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I retagged", "one. I will try to retag the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show", "best to create a new one. I have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork", "instances where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy", "'document-organization'\") which I think is an OK name for that - please suggest", "Sorry for the series of questions, but as every one of them is", "of questions, but as every one of them is slightly different I thought", "different I thought it best to create a new one. I have now", "should not be created, I retagged some of them where bureaucracy would fit", "'administration'\"), as they actually also are about administration issues, so I think that", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of questions, but as every", "series of questions, but as every one of them is slightly different I", "can think of a better one. I will try to retag the questions", "name for that - please suggest different names if you can think of", "tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where it was mistagged.", "- please suggest different names if you can think of a better one.", "was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged", "if you can think of a better one. I will try to retag", "think of a better one. I will try to retag the questions that", "[follow-up of this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show", "tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I retagged some", "\"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I retagged some of them", "they actually also are about administration issues, so I think that is a", "you can think of a better one. I will try to retag the", "a better one. I will try to retag the questions that fit into", "'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of questions, but as every one of them", "it can be deleted. As per my suggestion to create a new tag", "which I think is an OK name for that - please suggest different", "actually also are about administration issues, so I think that is a good", "every one of them is slightly different I thought it best to create", "good alternative. There is now no question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show", "also are about administration issues, so I think that is a good alternative.", "tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is an OK name", "one. I have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of questions, but as", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where it was mistagged. Following", "'paperwork'\") in all instances where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that", "is a good alternative. There is now no question left with the tag", "of them is slightly different I thought it best to create a new", "will try to retag the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged", "issues, so I think that is a good alternative. There is now no", "as they actually also are about administration issues, so I think that is", "to create a new tag for organizing papers, articles etc. I have also", "is slightly different I thought it best to create a new one. I", "questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") within the next days.", "proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series", "tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can be deleted. As per my suggestion", "different names if you can think of a better one. I will try", "suggest different names if you can think of a better one. I will", "them where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they", "so I guess it can be deleted. As per my suggestion to create", "the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can be", "deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where it", "to retag the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") within", "better one. I will try to retag the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization", "tag for organizing papers, articles etc. I have also created the new tag", "deleted. As per my suggestion to create a new tag for organizing papers,", "question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess", "this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions", "[document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is an OK name for", "bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also", "[paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can be deleted. As", "for that - please suggest different names if you can think of a", "of this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions", "This is a [follow-up of this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed with the", "one of them is slightly different I thought it best to create a", "new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is an OK", "I think is an OK name for that - please suggest different names", "'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I retagged some of them where bureaucracy would", "that is a good alternative. There is now no question left with the", "There is now no question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "them is slightly different I thought it best to create a new one.", "a good alternative. There is now no question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork", "that - please suggest different names if you can think of a better", "create a new tag for organizing papers, articles etc. I have also created", "suggestion to create a new tag for organizing papers, articles etc. I have", "it best to create a new one. I have now deleted the tag", "As per my suggestion to create a new tag for organizing papers, articles", "have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can be deleted. As per my", "created, I retagged some of them where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show", "a new one. I have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged", "Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not", "are about administration issues, so I think that is a good alternative. There", "as every one of them is slightly different I thought it best to", "be created, I retagged some of them where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of questions, but as every one", "alternative. There is now no question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions", "tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of questions, but as every one of", "I guess it can be deleted. As per my suggestion to create a", "a new tag for organizing papers, articles etc. I have also created the", "answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created,", "tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of questions, but", "questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted", "is now no question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"),", "upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be", "fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also are about", "'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can be deleted. As per my suggestion to", "to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the", "articles etc. I have also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged", "questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is an OK name for that -", "papers, articles etc. I have also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions", "retag the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") within the", "is a [follow-up of this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed with the tag", "an OK name for that - please suggest different names if you can", "I have also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which", "mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\")", "\"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also are about administration issues, so", "also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think", "I will try to retag the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions", "so I think that is a good alternative. There is now no question", "with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can", "per my suggestion to create a new tag for organizing papers, articles etc.", "where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can be deleted. As per", "all instances where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag", "question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\").", "how to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for", "in all instances where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a", "tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is an OK name for that - please", "etc. I have also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\")", "\"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's", "some of them where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged 'administration'\"),", "not be created, I retagged some of them where bureaucracy would fit with", "thought it best to create a new one. I have now deleted the", "create a new one. I have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions", "created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is", "the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry for the series of questions,", "organizing papers, articles etc. I have also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show", "questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I retagged some of them where", "that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I", "about how to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"). Sorry", "please suggest different names if you can think of a better one. I", "can be deleted. As per my suggestion to create a new tag for", "the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where it was", "new one. I have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\")", "retagged some of them where bureaucracy would fit with [administration](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/administration \"show questions tagged", "tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also are about administration issues, so I think", "think is an OK name for that - please suggest different names if", "but as every one of them is slightly different I thought it best", "have also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I", "I have now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all", "of a better one. I will try to retag the questions that fit", "new tag for organizing papers, articles etc. I have also created the new", "I think that is a good alternative. There is now no question left", "a [follow-up of this question](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5273/rename-tag-paperwork-and-create-new-tag-for-organizing-structuring-files-pa) about how to proceed with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork", "no question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I", "think that is a good alternative. There is now no question left with", "my suggestion to create a new tag for organizing papers, articles etc. I", "for organizing papers, articles etc. I have also created the new tag [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization", "[bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should not be created, I retagged some of", "now deleted the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where", "tagged 'paperwork'\") in all instances where it was mistagged. Following Anyon's upvoted answer", "tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it can be deleted.", "names if you can think of a better one. I will try to", "be deleted. As per my suggestion to create a new tag for organizing", "is an OK name for that - please suggest different names if you", "Following Anyon's upvoted answer that a tag [bureaucracy](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/bureaucracy \"show questions tagged 'bureaucracy'\") should", "questions tagged 'administration'\"), as they actually also are about administration issues, so I", "slightly different I thought it best to create a new one. I have", "now no question left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so", "the questions that fit into [document-organization](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/document-organization \"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") within the next", "\"show questions tagged 'document-organization'\") which I think is an OK name for that", "left with the tag [paperwork](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/paperwork \"show questions tagged 'paperwork'\"), so I guess it" ]
[ "irrespectful of the expertise and the work we have volunteered so far. Therefore,", "AI-generated content and how we should moderate it. This is a policy hastily", "volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested in spending my time for", "for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a lot, and it's been a pleasure", "I'm resigning. In the last few days the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a", "content and how we should moderate it. This is a policy hastily created", "past and present. So, well, so long and thanks for all the fish!", "Stack Exchange and forced to us moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful of", "moderate it. This is a policy hastily created by Stack Exchange and forced", "how we should moderate it. This is a policy hastily created by Stack", "and a honour to serve this community as a moderator, working together with", "spending my time for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a lot, and it's", "the expertise and the work we have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no", "This is a policy hastily created by Stack Exchange and forced to us", "learned a lot, and it's been a pleasure and a honour to serve", "staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how we should moderate", "and it's been a pleasure and a honour to serve this community as", "all the other moderators, past and present. So, well, so long and thanks", "with all the other moderators, past and present. So, well, so long and", "together with all the other moderators, past and present. So, well, so long", "resigning. In the last few days the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new", "Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how we", "in an insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise and the work we have", "all: I'm resigning. In the last few days the Stack Exchange staff introduced", "hastily created by Stack Exchange and forced to us moderators in an insulting", "insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise and the work we have volunteered so", "it. This is a policy hastily created by Stack Exchange and forced to", "no longer interested in spending my time for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned", "community as a moderator, working together with all the other moderators, past and", "Therefore, I'm no longer interested in spending my time for Stack Exchange. Here", "moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise and the work we", "it's been a pleasure and a honour to serve this community as a", "days the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and", "policy hastily created by Stack Exchange and forced to us moderators in an", "to serve this community as a moderator, working together with all the other", "Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how we should", "the last few days the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about", "Exchange. Here I've learned a lot, and it's been a pleasure and a", "the other moderators, past and present. So, well, so long and thanks for", "a policy hastily created by Stack Exchange and forced to us moderators in", "forced to us moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise and", "we should moderate it. This is a policy hastily created by Stack Exchange", "we have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested in spending my", "an insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise and the work we have volunteered", "last few days the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated", "other moderators, past and present. So, well, so long and thanks for all", "my time for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a lot, and it's been", "the work we have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested in", "created by Stack Exchange and forced to us moderators in an insulting way,", "as a moderator, working together with all the other moderators, past and present.", "few days the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content", "us moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise and the work", "a pleasure and a honour to serve this community as a moderator, working", "[a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how we should moderate it. This", "this community as a moderator, working together with all the other moderators, past", "and forced to us moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise", "moderators, past and present. So, well, so long and thanks for all the", "far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested in spending my time for Stack Exchange.", "moderator, working together with all the other moderators, past and present. So, well,", "In the last few days the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582)", "by Stack Exchange and forced to us moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful", "is a policy hastily created by Stack Exchange and forced to us moderators", "policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how we should moderate it. This is a", "Here I've learned a lot, and it's been a pleasure and a honour", "pleasure and a honour to serve this community as a moderator, working together", "working together with all the other moderators, past and present. So, well, so", "Exchange and forced to us moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful of the", "expertise and the work we have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no longer", "Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a lot, and it's been a pleasure and", "honour to serve this community as a moderator, working together with all the", "so far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested in spending my time for Stack", "title says it all: I'm resigning. In the last few days the Stack", "in spending my time for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a lot, and", "new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how we should moderate it. This is", "time for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a lot, and it's been a", "I've learned a lot, and it's been a pleasure and a honour to", "been a pleasure and a honour to serve this community as a moderator,", "of the expertise and the work we have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm", "and the work we have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested", "it all: I'm resigning. In the last few days the Stack Exchange staff", "to us moderators in an insulting way, irrespectful of the expertise and the", "and how we should moderate it. This is a policy hastily created by", "work we have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested in spending", "way, irrespectful of the expertise and the work we have volunteered so far.", "have volunteered so far. Therefore, I'm no longer interested in spending my time", "a honour to serve this community as a moderator, working together with all", "serve this community as a moderator, working together with all the other moderators,", "a moderator, working together with all the other moderators, past and present. So,", "interested in spending my time for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a lot,", "about AI-generated content and how we should moderate it. This is a policy", "a lot, and it's been a pleasure and a honour to serve this", "should moderate it. This is a policy hastily created by Stack Exchange and", "longer interested in spending my time for Stack Exchange. Here I've learned a", "introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how we should moderate it.", "says it all: I'm resigning. In the last few days the Stack Exchange", "lot, and it's been a pleasure and a honour to serve this community", "I'm no longer interested in spending my time for Stack Exchange. Here I've", "the Stack Exchange staff introduced [a new policy](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389582) about AI-generated content and how", "The title says it all: I'm resigning. In the last few days the" ]
[ "situation even worse. And the company has historically shown little flexibility even when", "long, and thanks for all the fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019, a", "to our site, except under very limited circumstances. While the exact details are", "concerned because many of our users are asking for advice on life-altering career", "really, this seems to be our only option short of allowing AI-generated content", "the fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019, a popular moderator was fired and", "banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently than human-generated", "all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that \"this standard would exclude most suspensions", "the situation even worse. And the company has historically shown little flexibility even", "company issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their", "pushing back against this policy for a week already to no avail. On", "as a result company-moderator trust is not very high. ### When will this", "thanks for all the fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019, a popular moderator", "end? Our sole demand is that any network-wide policies must allow this stack", "we've been told about another policy in the pipeline that will make the", "most suspensions issued to date.\" In other words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/)", "others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because many", "not very high. ### When will this end? Our sole demand is that", "not to intervene when AI-generated content is posted to our site, except under", "damage to someone's life. While we recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult", "such a setting, automatically-generated content is not a mere nuisance, but can cause", "circumstances. While the exact details are not public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively", "where bots talk to bots. In that case....we appreciate you for having elected", "Qrauze) are on strike. This is part of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/),", "been pushing back against this policy for a week already to no avail.", "we are willing to take guidance. But a policy that effectively allows all", "[ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated content is posted to our site, except", "our network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing back against this policy for a", "close and editing posts (but everyone will make their own choice; please don't", "Not really, this seems to be our only option short of allowing AI-generated", "Moderators network-wide have been pushing back against this policy for a week already", "short of allowing AI-generated content to run rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide", "we don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived), and", "and new moderators are elected. That's fine, we don't get paid (even the", "but refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution was to form a", "reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution was to form a \"moderator council\" to", "having elected us; so long, and thanks for all the fish. \\\\ For", "negatives, the current policy (don't do anything at all) is the worst possible", "words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated", "the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that", "demand is that any network-wide policies must allow this stack to delete the", "a \"moderator council\" to make us feel heard, but the council never had", "is hardly necessary to explain why this is a problem generally (and others", "this will end when we all get fired and new moderators are elected.", "participate normally). ### Why is this happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not", "to delete the majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who post it.", "Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This is part of the network-wide action [described", "Alternatively, this will end when we all get fired and new moderators are", "posts (but everyone will make their own choice; please don't harass users who", "admits that \"this standard would exclude most suspensions issued to date.\" In other", "contrary, we've been told about another policy in the pipeline that will make", "post it. We acknowledge that there will be false positives and false negatives,", "details are not public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated", "worse. And the company has historically shown little flexibility even when they were", "content and message/suspend users who post it. We acknowledge that there will be", "community managers have been great, and we had successfully built a certain amount", "apology but refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution was to form", "allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that \"this standard would exclude", "explain why this is a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here", "get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived), and there is", "on life-altering career decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated content is not a", "who continue to participate normally). ### Why is this happening? We moderators have", "told about another policy in the pipeline that will make the situation even", "disbanded. Even so, the individual community managers have been great, and we had", "almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that \"this standard would exclude most", "feel heard, but the council never had much influence and has since disbanded.", "such as voting, voting to close and editing posts (but everyone will make", "(even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived), and there is little point", "overreaction? Not really, this seems to be our only option short of allowing", "be false positives and false negatives, and so we are willing to take", "make their own choice; please don't harass users who continue to participate normally).", "to form a \"moderator council\" to make us feel heard, but the council", "council never had much influence and has since disbanded. Even so, the individual", "arrived), and there is little point in sticking around so we can impotently", "We acknowledge that there will be false positives and false negatives, and so", "than human-generated content. It is hardly necessary to explain why this is a", "to detect, and there will be false positives and false negatives, the current", "a mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage to someone's life. While we", "is a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we", "Our sole demand is that any network-wide policies must allow this stack to", "our site, except under very limited circumstances. While the exact details are not", "anything at all) is the worst possible response. ### Is this an overreaction?", "the current policy (don't do anything at all) is the worst possible response.", "be treated differently than human-generated content. It is hardly necessary to explain why", "fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019, a popular moderator was fired and slandered", "AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to detect, and there will be false positives", "cannot be treated differently than human-generated content. It is hardly necessary to explain", "run rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing back against this", "sole demand is that any network-wide policies must allow this stack to delete", "was to form a \"moderator council\" to make us feel heard, but the", "end when we all get fired and new moderators are elected. That's fine,", "automatically-generated content is not a mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage to", "We will not perform any moderation functions until this situation is resolved. Other", "we can impotently preside over a hellscape where bots talk to bots. In", "the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived), and there is little point in", "result company-moderator trust is not very high. ### When will this end? Our", "policy in the pipeline that will make the situation even worse. And the", "publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that \"this", "(and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because", "the worst possible response. ### Is this an overreaction? Not really, this seems", "negatives, and so we are willing to take guidance. But a policy that", "automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when we all get fired", "exclude most suspensions issued to date.\" In other words: [our policy banning AI-generated", "for advice on life-altering career decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated content is", "we were promised never arrived), and there is little point in sticking around", "career decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated content is not a mere nuisance,", "In other words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot", "For context: in 2019, a popular moderator was fired and slandered publicly; after", "it. We acknowledge that there will be false positives and false negatives, and", "that will make the situation even worse. And the company has historically shown", "to bots. In that case....we appreciate you for having elected us; so long,", "the company issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead,", "even worse. And the company has historically shown little flexibility even when they", "were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust is not very high. ###", "and we had successfully built a certain amount of trust before this incident", "our only option short of allowing AI-generated content to run rampant over our", "had much influence and has since disbanded. Even so, the individual community managers", "is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when we all get fired and new", "are welcome to join us by refusing to perform moderation functions such as", "is this happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated", "delete the majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who post it. We", "this situation is resolved. Other users are welcome to join us by refusing", "to no avail. On the contrary, we've been told about another policy in", "problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we are particularly", "network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing back against this policy for a week", "company has historically shown little flexibility even when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as", "take guidance. But a policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable.", "network-wide policies must allow this stack to delete the majority of automatically-generated content", "voting to close and editing posts (but everyone will make their own choice;", "to be our only option short of allowing AI-generated content to run rampant", "of allowing AI-generated content to run rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide have", "for all the fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019, a popular moderator was", "This is part of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia", "lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution was to", "situation is resolved. Other users are welcome to join us by refusing to", "[have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because many of our", "false positives and false negatives, the current policy (don't do anything at all)", "were promised never arrived), and there is little point in sticking around so", "follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We will not perform", "(don't do anything at all) is the worst possible response. ### Is this", "[resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We will not perform any moderation functions until", "a huge uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate", "a week already to no avail. On the contrary, we've been told about", "as voting, voting to close and editing posts (but everyone will make their", "days ago. We will not perform any moderation functions until this situation is", "bots. In that case....we appreciate you for having elected us; so long, and", "don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived), and there", "in sticking around so we can impotently preside over a hellscape where bots", "Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We will not perform any moderation", "we had successfully built a certain amount of trust before this incident destroyed", "slandered publicly; after a huge uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak apology but", "normally). ### Why is this happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to", "been told about another policy in the pipeline that will make the situation", "around so we can impotently preside over a hellscape where bots talk to", "positives and false negatives, the current policy (don't do anything at all) is", "network-wide have been pushing back against this policy for a week already to", "that \"this standard would exclude most suspensions issued to date.\" In other words:", "another policy in the pipeline that will make the situation even worse. And", "against this policy for a week already to no avail. On the contrary,", "when AI-generated content is posted to our site, except under very limited circumstances.", "hardly necessary to explain why this is a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376)", "[already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because many of", "worst possible response. ### Is this an overreaction? Not really, this seems to", "difficult to detect, and there will be false positives and false negatives, the", "even when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust is not", "influence and has since disbanded. Even so, the individual community managers have been", "Even so, the individual community managers have been great, and we had successfully", "on strike. This is part of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows", "there will be false positives and false negatives, and so we are willing", "must allow this stack to delete the majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend", "is resolved. Other users are welcome to join us by refusing to perform", "setting, automatically-generated content is not a mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage", "a few days ago. We will not perform any moderation functions until this", "a result company-moderator trust is not very high. ### When will this end?", "all the fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019, a popular moderator was fired", "been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated content is posted to our site,", "when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust is not very", "content to run rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing back", "Is this an overreaction? Not really, this seems to be our only option", "AI-generated content is posted to our site, except under very limited circumstances. While", "heard, but the council never had much influence and has since disbanded. Even", "We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated content is posted", "not perform any moderation functions until this situation is resolved. Other users are", "great, and we had successfully built a certain amount of trust before this", "this an overreaction? Not really, this seems to be our only option short", "[swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived), and there is little point in sticking", "here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We will", "all get fired and new moderators are elected. That's fine, we don't get", "automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently than human-generated content. It is hardly necessary", "false negatives, the current policy (don't do anything at all) is the worst", "has since disbanded. Even so, the individual community managers have been great, and", "historically shown little flexibility even when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result", "to make us feel heard, but the council never had much influence and", "to intervene when AI-generated content is posted to our site, except under very", "differently than human-generated content. It is hardly necessary to explain why this is", "Academia.SE (wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This is part of", "us by refusing to perform moderation functions such as voting, voting to close", "functions until this situation is resolved. Other users are welcome to join us", "this happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated content", "But here on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because many of our users", "welcome to join us by refusing to perform moderation functions such as voting,", "action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago.", "AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently than human-generated content.", "context: in 2019, a popular moderator was fired and slandered publicly; after a", "the pipeline that will make the situation even worse. And the company has", "impotently preside over a hellscape where bots talk to bots. In that case....we", "a popular moderator was fired and slandered publicly; after a huge uproar, the", "treated differently than human-generated content. It is hardly necessary to explain why this", "issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution", "avail. On the contrary, we've been told about another policy in the pipeline", "clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust is not very high. ### When", "current policy (don't do anything at all) is the worst possible response. ###", "the individual community managers have been great, and we had successfully built a", "there is little point in sticking around so we can impotently preside over", "pipeline that will make the situation even worse. And the company has historically", "option short of allowing AI-generated content to run rampant over our network. Moderators", "resolved. Other users are welcome to join us by refusing to perform moderation", "And the company has historically shown little flexibility even when they were clearly", "the council never had much influence and has since disbanded. Even so, the", "continue to participate normally). ### Why is this happening? We moderators have been", "cause irreparable damage to someone's life. While we recognize that AI-generated content is", "week already to no avail. On the contrary, we've been told about another", "why this is a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on", "Why is this happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when", "ago. We will not perform any moderation functions until this situation is resolved.", "irreparable damage to someone's life. While we recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly", "possible response. ### Is this an overreaction? Not really, this seems to be", "are willing to take guidance. But a policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated", "fine, we don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived),", "managers have been great, and we had successfully built a certain amount of", "voting, voting to close and editing posts (but everyone will make their own", "and there will be false positives and false negatives, the current policy (don't", "Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because many of our users are asking for", "moderator. Instead, their solution was to form a \"moderator council\" to make us", "little flexibility even when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust", "never had much influence and has since disbanded. Even so, the individual community", "to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution was to form a \"moderator council\"", "had successfully built a certain amount of trust before this incident destroyed everything", "happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated content is", "\"moderator council\" to make us feel heard, but the council never had much", "users are asking for advice on life-altering career decisions. In such a setting,", "response. ### Is this an overreaction? Not really, this seems to be our", "moderators are elected. That's fine, we don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we", "Effective immediately, the moderators of Academia.SE (wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on", "are not public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated content", "and so we are willing to take guidance. But a policy that effectively", "this stack to delete the majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who", "that case....we appreciate you for having elected us; so long, and thanks for", "hellscape where bots talk to bots. In that case....we appreciate you for having", "increasingly difficult to detect, and there will be false positives and false negatives,", "flexibility even when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust is", "human-generated content. It is hardly necessary to explain why this is a problem", "this is a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE,", "be our only option short of allowing AI-generated content to run rampant over", "content is posted to our site, except under very limited circumstances. While the", "refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution was to form a \"moderator", "under very limited circumstances. While the exact details are not public, even the", "an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We will not perform any", "automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who post it. We acknowledge that there will", "and false negatives, and so we are willing to take guidance. But a", "a lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate the moderator. Instead, their solution was", "everyone will make their own choice; please don't harass users who continue to", "false negatives, and so we are willing to take guidance. But a policy", "choice; please don't harass users who continue to participate normally). ### Why is", "to close and editing posts (but everyone will make their own choice; please", "unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when we all get fired and new moderators", "to join us by refusing to perform moderation functions such as voting, voting", "site, except under very limited circumstances. While the exact details are not public,", "all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when we all get", "very high. ### When will this end? Our sole demand is that any", "detect, and there will be false positives and false negatives, the current policy", "to explain why this is a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But", "decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated content is not a mere nuisance, but", "### When will this end? Our sole demand is that any network-wide policies", "the exact details are not public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost", "has historically shown little flexibility even when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a", "new moderators are elected. That's fine, we don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/)", "exact details are not public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all", "site-wide, and admits that \"this standard would exclude most suspensions issued to date.\"", "so long, and thanks for all the fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019,", "mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage to someone's life. While we recognize", "trust is not very high. ### When will this end? Our sole demand", "point in sticking around so we can impotently preside over a hellscape where", "policies must allow this stack to delete the majority of automatically-generated content and", "already to no avail. On the contrary, we've been told about another policy", "issued to date.\" In other words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable;", "of our users are asking for advice on life-altering career decisions. In such", "sticking around so we can impotently preside over a hellscape where bots talk", "company-moderator trust is not very high. ### When will this end? Our sole", "It is hardly necessary to explain why this is a problem generally (and", "is not very high. ### When will this end? Our sole demand is", "to take guidance. But a policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated content is", "harass users who continue to participate normally). ### Why is this happening? We", "popular moderator was fired and slandered publicly; after a huge uproar, the company", "moderation functions until this situation is resolved. Other users are welcome to join", "users are welcome to join us by refusing to perform moderation functions such", "you for having elected us; so long, and thanks for all the fish.", "allow this stack to delete the majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users", "elected. That's fine, we don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised", "only option short of allowing AI-generated content to run rampant over our network.", "seems to be our only option short of allowing AI-generated content to run", "many of our users are asking for advice on life-altering career decisions. In", "that effectively allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when", "refusing to perform moderation functions such as voting, voting to close and editing", "policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently than", "get fired and new moderators are elected. That's fine, we don't get paid", "on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because many of our users are asking", "On the contrary, we've been told about another policy in the pipeline that", "the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few", "content. It is hardly necessary to explain why this is a problem generally", "bots talk to bots. In that case....we appreciate you for having elected us;", "will be false positives and false negatives, the current policy (don't do anything", "can impotently preside over a hellscape where bots talk to bots. In that", "their own choice; please don't harass users who continue to participate normally). ###", "majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who post it. We acknowledge that", "perform any moderation functions until this situation is resolved. Other users are welcome", "[our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently", "preside over a hellscape where bots talk to bots. In that case....we appreciate", "strike. This is part of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an", "necessary to explain why this is a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)).", "(wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This is part of the", "no avail. On the contrary, we've been told about another policy in the", "this policy for a week already to no avail. On the contrary, we've", "is part of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator", "is increasingly difficult to detect, and there will be false positives and false", "but can cause irreparable damage to someone's life. While we recognize that AI-generated", "to perform moderation functions such as voting, voting to close and editing posts", "life-altering career decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated content is not a mere", "\"this standard would exclude most suspensions issued to date.\" In other words: [our", "part of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1)", "will make the situation even worse. And the company has historically shown little", "when we all get fired and new moderators are elected. That's fine, we", "is little point in sticking around so we can impotently preside over a", "until this situation is resolved. Other users are welcome to join us by", "policy (don't do anything at all) is the worst possible response. ### Is", "and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We will not", "content is increasingly difficult to detect, and there will be false positives and", "That's fine, we don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never", "all) is the worst possible response. ### Is this an overreaction? Not really,", "not public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide,", "by refusing to perform moderation functions such as voting, voting to close and", "AI-generated content to run rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing", "this end? Our sole demand is that any network-wide policies must allow this", "a hellscape where bots talk to bots. In that case....we appreciate you for", "will this end? Our sole demand is that any network-wide policies must allow", "message/suspend users who post it. We acknowledge that there will be false positives", "users who continue to participate normally). ### Why is this happening? We moderators", "that there will be false positives and false negatives, and so we are", "cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This is part of the network-wide", "perform moderation functions such as voting, voting to close and editing posts (but", "When will this end? Our sole demand is that any network-wide policies must", "wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust is not very high. ### When will", "the company has historically shown little flexibility even when they were clearly wrong\\\\;", "in the pipeline that will make the situation even worse. And the company", "rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing back against this policy", "and editing posts (but everyone will make their own choice; please don't harass", "here on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned because many of our users are", "effectively allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when we", "there will be false positives and false negatives, the current policy (don't do", "editing posts (but everyone will make their own choice; please don't harass users", "fired and slandered publicly; after a huge uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak", "to participate normally). ### Why is this happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376)", "are asking for advice on life-altering career decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated", "\\\\ For context: in 2019, a popular moderator was fired and slandered publicly;", "an overreaction? Not really, this seems to be our only option short of", "have been pushing back against this policy for a week already to no", "very limited circumstances. While the exact details are not public, even the publicly-available", "of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a", "acknowledge that there will be false positives and false negatives, and so we", "posted to our site, except under very limited circumstances. While the exact details", "over a hellscape where bots talk to bots. In that case....we appreciate you", "advice on life-altering career decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated content is not", "immediately, the moderators of Academia.SE (wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike.", "moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated content is posted to", "asking for advice on life-altering career decisions. In such a setting, automatically-generated content", "content site-wide, and admits that \"this standard would exclude most suspensions issued to", "content cannot be treated differently than human-generated content. It is hardly necessary to", "own choice; please don't harass users who continue to participate normally). ### Why", "nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage to someone's life. While we recognize that", "make the situation even worse. And the company has historically shown little flexibility", "and there is little point in sticking around so we can impotently preside", "particularly concerned because many of our users are asking for advice on life-altering", "so we can impotently preside over a hellscape where bots talk to bots.", "after a huge uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused to", "effectively allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that \"this standard would", "a setting, automatically-generated content is not a mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable", "allowing AI-generated content to run rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide have been", "form a \"moderator council\" to make us feel heard, but the council never", "(but everyone will make their own choice; please don't harass users who continue", "publicly; after a huge uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused", "join us by refusing to perform moderation functions such as voting, voting to", "and false negatives, the current policy (don't do anything at all) is the", "the majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who post it. We acknowledge", "are on strike. This is part of the network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and", "except under very limited circumstances. While the exact details are not public, even", "guidance. But a policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively,", "individual community managers have been great, and we had successfully built a certain", "and message/suspend users who post it. We acknowledge that there will be false", "for having elected us; so long, and thanks for all the fish. \\\\", "content is not a mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage to someone's", "While the exact details are not public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows", "little point in sticking around so we can impotently preside over a hellscape", "will not perform any moderation functions until this situation is resolved. Other users", "are particularly concerned because many of our users are asking for advice on", "suspensions issued to date.\" In other words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is", "uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate the moderator.", "much influence and has since disbanded. Even so, the individual community managers have", "intervene when AI-generated content is posted to our site, except under very limited", "elected us; so long, and thanks for all the fish. \\\\ For context:", "please don't harass users who continue to participate normally). ### Why is this", "can cause irreparable damage to someone's life. While we recognize that AI-generated content", "been great, and we had successfully built a certain amount of trust before", "and has since disbanded. Even so, the individual community managers have been great,", "a policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will", "even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits", "fired and new moderators are elected. That's fine, we don't get paid (even", "false positives and false negatives, and so we are willing to take guidance.", "we recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to detect, and there will", "because many of our users are asking for advice on life-altering career decisions.", "was fired and slandered publicly; after a huge uproar, the company issued a", "someone's life. While we recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to detect,", "### Is this an overreaction? Not really, this seems to be our only", "the moderators of Academia.SE (wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This", "council\" to make us feel heard, but the council never had much influence", "and admits that \"this standard would exclude most suspensions issued to date.\" In", "make us feel heard, but the council never had much influence and has", "willing to take guidance. But a policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated content", "unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently than human-generated content. It is hardly", "this seems to be our only option short of allowing AI-generated content to", "have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene when AI-generated content is posted to our", "few days ago. We will not perform any moderation functions until this situation", "in 2019, a popular moderator was fired and slandered publicly; after a huge", "In that case....we appreciate you for having elected us; so long, and thanks", "paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were promised never arrived), and there is little", "to date.\" In other words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated", "appreciate you for having elected us; so long, and thanks for all the", "have been great, and we had successfully built a certain amount of trust", "life. While we recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to detect, and", "2019, a popular moderator was fired and slandered publicly; after a huge uproar,", "But a policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this", "allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when we all", "AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that \"this standard would exclude most suspensions issued", "While we recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to detect, and there", "the contrary, we've been told about another policy in the pipeline that will", "standard would exclude most suspensions issued to date.\" In other words: [our policy", "of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who post it. We acknowledge that there", "any network-wide policies must allow this stack to delete the majority of automatically-generated", "date.\" In other words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content", "any moderation functions until this situation is resolved. Other users are welcome to", "to run rampant over our network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing back against", "public, even the publicly-available guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and", "the moderator. Instead, their solution was to form a \"moderator council\" to make", "policy for a week already to no avail. On the contrary, we've been", "[described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We", "answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently than human-generated content. It", "guidance effectively allows almost all AI-generated content site-wide, and admits that \"this standard", "a problem generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we are", "promised never arrived), and there is little point in sticking around so we", "our users are asking for advice on life-altering career decisions. In such a", "will make their own choice; please don't harass users who continue to participate", "over our network. Moderators network-wide have been pushing back against this policy for", "content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end when we all get fired and", "back against this policy for a week already to no avail. On the", "Instead, their solution was to form a \"moderator council\" to make us feel", "recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to detect, and there will be", "network-wide action [described here](https://openletter.mousetail.nl/), and follows an Academia moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days", "at all) is the worst possible response. ### Is this an overreaction? Not", "to someone's life. While we recognize that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to", "positives and false negatives, and so we are willing to take guidance. But", "who post it. We acknowledge that there will be false positives and false", "stack to delete the majority of automatically-generated content and message/suspend users who post", "and thanks for all the fish. \\\\ For context: in 2019, a popular", "talk to bots. In that case....we appreciate you for having elected us; so", "their solution was to form a \"moderator council\" to make us feel heard,", "that AI-generated content is increasingly difficult to detect, and there will be false", "about another policy in the pipeline that will make the situation even worse.", "users who post it. We acknowledge that there will be false positives and", "moderators of Academia.SE (wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This is", "we are particularly concerned because many of our users are asking for advice", "never arrived), and there is little point in sticking around so we can", "generally (and others [already](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/389558/386376) [have](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389617/discussion-network-policy-regarding-ai-generated-content)). But here on Academia.SE, we are particularly concerned", "### Why is this happening? We moderators have been [ordered](https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/389583/386376) not to intervene", "do anything at all) is the worst possible response. ### Is this an", "moderation functions such as voting, voting to close and editing posts (but everyone", "functions such as voting, voting to close and editing posts (but everyone will", "since disbanded. Even so, the individual community managers have been great, and we", "high. ### When will this end? Our sole demand is that any network-wide", "and slandered publicly; after a huge uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak apology", "limited circumstances. While the exact details are not public, even the publicly-available guidance", "Other users are welcome to join us by refusing to perform moderation functions", "is the worst possible response. ### Is this an overreaction? Not really, this", "is posted to our site, except under very limited circumstances. While the exact", "be false positives and false negatives, the current policy (don't do anything at", "we all get fired and new moderators are elected. That's fine, we don't", "is that any network-wide policies must allow this stack to delete the majority", "they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator trust is not very high.", "moderator was fired and slandered publicly; after a huge uproar, the company issued", "don't harass users who continue to participate normally). ### Why is this happening?", "other words: [our policy banning AI-generated answers](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5225/) is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be", "are elected. That's fine, we don't get paid (even the [swag](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/358195/) we were", "policy that effectively allows all automatically-generated content is unacceptable. Alternatively, this will end", "would exclude most suspensions issued to date.\" In other words: [our policy banning", "will end when we all get fired and new moderators are elected. That's", "In such a setting, automatically-generated content is not a mere nuisance, but can", "so, the individual community managers have been great, and we had successfully built", "will be false positives and false negatives, and so we are willing to", "of Academia.SE (wrzlprmft, cag51, and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This is part", "case....we appreciate you for having elected us; so long, and thanks for all", "is unenforceable; automatically-generated content cannot be treated differently than human-generated content. It is", "us feel heard, but the council never had much influence and has since", "not a mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage to someone's life. While", "and Bydon Qrauze) are on strike. This is part of the network-wide action", "but the council never had much influence and has since disbanded. Even so,", "huge uproar, the company issued a lawyer-speak apology but refused to reinstate the", "us; so long, and thanks for all the fish. \\\\ For context: in", "solution was to form a \"moderator council\" to make us feel heard, but", "moderator [resignation](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5283/its-time-for-me-to-resign?cb=1) a few days ago. We will not perform any moderation functions", "is not a mere nuisance, but can cause irreparable damage to someone's life.", "so we are willing to take guidance. But a policy that effectively allows", "successfully built a certain amount of trust before this incident destroyed everything again.", "for a week already to no avail. On the contrary, we've been told", "that any network-wide policies must allow this stack to delete the majority of", "shown little flexibility even when they were clearly wrong\\\\; as a result company-moderator" ]
[ "on SE. However, browsing the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of", "questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary catches my attention.", "nothing out of the ordinary catches my attention. So is there a noticeable", "strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one of the highest-volume sites, so SE might", "high enough that moderation should be necessary regularly. For these reasons, when the", "impact of the strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff or regular", "* all its moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not", "of the highest-volume sites, so SE might not see it as a priority", "one of the highest-volume sites, so SE might not see it as a", "imagined that this site would be a good one to evaluate the impact", "pressure it can put on SE. However, browsing the questions on the [main", "all its moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one", "a good one to evaluate the impact of the moderation strike and see", "can put on SE. However, browsing the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing", "it can put on SE. However, browsing the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/),", "reasons, when the strike was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that this site", "it is not one of the highest-volume sites, so SE might not see", "not see it as a priority to intervene here * however, the traffic", "evaluate the impact of the moderation strike and see how much pressure it", "be a good one to evaluate the impact of the moderation strike and", "that * all its moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is", "that moderation should be necessary regularly. For these reasons, when the strike was", "Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff or regular users) taking care of the", "not one of the highest-volume sites, so SE might not see it as", "is there a noticeable impact of the strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone", "is high enough that moderation should be necessary regularly. For these reasons, when", "might not see it as a priority to intervene here * however, the", "is quite particular in the sense that * all its moderators [seem to", "sites, so SE might not see it as a priority to intervene here", "[main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary catches my attention. So is there", "moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one of the", "site would be a good one to evaluate the impact of the moderation", "put on SE. However, browsing the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out", "So is there a noticeable impact of the strike on Academia.SE? Or is", "the traffic is high enough that moderation should be necessary regularly. For these", "my attention. So is there a noticeable impact of the strike on Academia.SE?", "moderation should be necessary regularly. For these reasons, when the strike was announced", "in the sense that * all its moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007)", "here * however, the traffic is high enough that moderation should be necessary", "that this site would be a good one to evaluate the impact of", "this site would be a good one to evaluate the impact of the", "to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one of the highest-volume sites,", "it as a priority to intervene here * however, the traffic is high", "much pressure it can put on SE. However, browsing the questions on the", "the sense that * all its moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) ", "moderation strike and see how much pressure it can put on SE. However,", "the impact of the moderation strike and see how much pressure it can", "so SE might not see it as a priority to intervene here ", "page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary catches my attention. So is there a", "of the strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff or regular users)", "Or is someone else (staff or regular users) taking care of the moderation?", "intervene here * however, the traffic is high enough that moderation should be", "Academia.SE is quite particular in the sense that * all its moderators [seem", "catches my attention. So is there a noticeable impact of the strike on", "when the strike was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that this site would", "strike was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that this site would be a", "would be a good one to evaluate the impact of the moderation strike", "* it is not one of the highest-volume sites, so SE might not", "the strike was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that this site would be", "noticeable impact of the strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff or", "to evaluate the impact of the moderation strike and see how much pressure", "[seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one of the highest-volume", "be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one of the highest-volume sites, so", "how much pressure it can put on SE. However, browsing the questions on", "particular in the sense that * all its moderators [seem to be on", "regularly. For these reasons, when the strike was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined", "good one to evaluate the impact of the moderation strike and see how", "browsing the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary catches", "sense that * all its moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it", "a priority to intervene here * however, the traffic is high enough that", "I imagined that this site would be a good one to evaluate the", "on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary catches my attention. So", "on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one of the highest-volume sites, so SE", "be necessary regularly. For these reasons, when the strike was announced on Academia.SE,", "the highest-volume sites, so SE might not see it as a priority to", "however, the traffic is high enough that moderation should be necessary regularly. For", "on Academia.SE, I imagined that this site would be a good one to", "its moderators [seem to be on strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/5286/112007) * it is not one of", "strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff or regular users) taking care", "SE. However, browsing the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the", "and see how much pressure it can put on SE. However, browsing the", "the ordinary catches my attention. So is there a noticeable impact of the", "the strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff or regular users) taking", "is not one of the highest-volume sites, so SE might not see it", "of the moderation strike and see how much pressure it can put on", "priority to intervene here * however, the traffic is high enough that moderation", "see it as a priority to intervene here * however, the traffic is", "necessary regularly. For these reasons, when the strike was announced on Academia.SE, I", "However, browsing the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary", "quite particular in the sense that * all its moderators [seem to be", "ordinary catches my attention. So is there a noticeable impact of the strike", "see how much pressure it can put on SE. However, browsing the questions", "the questions on the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary catches my", "to intervene here * however, the traffic is high enough that moderation should", "there a noticeable impact of the strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone else", "impact of the moderation strike and see how much pressure it can put", "traffic is high enough that moderation should be necessary regularly. For these reasons,", "For these reasons, when the strike was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that", "the moderation strike and see how much pressure it can put on SE.", "as a priority to intervene here * however, the traffic is high enough", "a noticeable impact of the strike on Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff", "on Academia.SE? Or is someone else (staff or regular users) taking care of", "should be necessary regularly. For these reasons, when the strike was announced on", "* however, the traffic is high enough that moderation should be necessary regularly.", "these reasons, when the strike was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that this", "enough that moderation should be necessary regularly. For these reasons, when the strike", "SE might not see it as a priority to intervene here * however,", "Academia.SE, I imagined that this site would be a good one to evaluate", "one to evaluate the impact of the moderation strike and see how much", "announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that this site would be a good one", "the [main page](https://academia.stackexchange.com/), nothing out of the ordinary catches my attention. So is", "out of the ordinary catches my attention. So is there a noticeable impact", "was announced on Academia.SE, I imagined that this site would be a good", "attention. So is there a noticeable impact of the strike on Academia.SE? Or", "strike and see how much pressure it can put on SE. However, browsing", "of the ordinary catches my attention. So is there a noticeable impact of", "highest-volume sites, so SE might not see it as a priority to intervene" ]
[ "technical issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that this", "the project, you will see that it tries really hard to serve people.", "content of research and coursework rather than the processes of researching, teaching, and", "and Twitter, but yet received a reply. > > > Would this question", "about the processes of researching, not the content of research. Though I'm not", "search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization and yet the string", "> > > Would this question be on-topic? * No, because [questions about", "classify this project as a research, then I can make an argument that", "well documented that I really want to use it. Unfortunately, I still don't", "WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole", "about the content of research and coursework rather than the processes of researching,", "question: > > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project is", "really hard to serve people. I must say that I'm very impressed on", "convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes tools of researching. It's more about the", "you may argue that this project is not a service, but if you", "yet received a reply. > > > Would this question be on-topic? ", "Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code)", "Yes,* because [questions asking technical issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you", "others to use. And even if you still classify this project as a", "the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the", "I'm not completely convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes tools of researching. It's", "- Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search for the", "that asking about the tools it used is more about the processes of", "the string only appears in the doc repo. I asked on both their", "about the tools it used is more about the processes of researching, not", "not a service, but if you spend some time to read about the", "in the whole organization and yet the string only appears in the doc", "question be on-topic? * No, because [questions about the content of research and", "so resourceful and well documented that I really want to use it. Unfortunately,", "and reports for others to use. And even if you still classify this", "must say that I'm very impressed on its effort to make tools, documentations", "their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but yet received a reply. > >", "that it tries really hard to serve people. I must say that I'm", "on-topic? * No, because [questions about the content of research and coursework rather", "Unfortunately, I still don't know where is the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/", "No, because [questions about the content of research and coursework rather than the", "used is more about the processes of researching, not the content of research.", "whole organization and yet the string only appears in the doc repo. I", "project is so resourceful and well documented that I really want to use", "my question: > > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project", "and yet the string only appears in the doc repo. I asked on", "of research and coursework rather than the processes of researching, teaching, and learning", "tools, documentations and reports for others to use. And even if you still", "use. And even if you still classify this project as a research, then", "and coursework rather than the processes of researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)?", "content of research. Though I'm not completely convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes", "people. I must say that I'm very impressed on its effort to make", "it used is more about the processes of researching, not the content of", "Project - Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search for", "I really want to use it. Unfortunately, I still don't know where is", "an argument that asking about the tools it used is more about the", "file in the whole organization and yet the string only appears in the", "issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that this project", "the doc repo. I asked on both their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter,", "the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization and yet the string only appears", "a service, but if you spend some time to read about the project,", "for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization and yet the string only", "don't know where is the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project", "as a research, then I can make an argument that asking about the", "The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful and", "of research. Though I'm not completely convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes tools", "yet the string only appears in the doc repo. I asked on both", "want to use it. Unfortunately, I still don't know where is the repo", "page and Twitter, but yet received a reply. > > > Would this", "but yet received a reply. > > > Would this question be on-topic?", "the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting Started with", "Workspace\") referring to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization", "you spend some time to read about the project, you will see that", "I must say that I'm very impressed on its effort to make tools,", "Facebook page and Twitter, but yet received a reply. > > > Would", "I still don't know where is the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating", "hard to serve people. I must say that I'm very impressed on its", "argue that this project is not a service, but if you spend some", "to use it. Unfortunately, I still don't know where is the repo that", "doc repo. I asked on both their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but", "may argue that this project is not a service, but if you spend", "about the project, you will see that it tries really hard to serve", "repo. I asked on both their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but yet", "to use. And even if you still classify this project as a research,", "And even if you still classify this project as a research, then I", "is the draft of my question: > > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S –", "more about the processes of researching, not the content of research. Though I'm", "for others to use. And even if you still classify this project as", "it tries really hard to serve people. I must say that I'm very", "read about the project, you will see that it tries really hard to", "completely convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes tools of researching. It's more about", "[WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful and well", "the whole organization and yet the string only appears in the doc repo.", "Twitter, but yet received a reply. > > > Would this question be", "reply. > > > Would this question be on-topic? * No, because [questions", "be on-topic? * No, because [questions about the content of research and coursework", "service, but if you spend some time to read about the project, you", "see that it tries really hard to serve people. I must say that", "to make tools, documentations and reports for others to use. And even if", "if you still classify this project as a research, then I can make", "on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that this project is", "> > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project is so", "a reply. > > > Would this question be on-topic? * No, because", "referring to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization and", "really want to use it. Unfortunately, I still don't know where is the", "asking about the tools it used is more about the processes of researching,", "you still classify this project as a research, then I can make an", "organization and yet the string only appears in the doc repo. I asked", "Project\") project is so resourceful and well documented that I really want to", "rather than the processes of researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes,", "reports for others to use. And even if you still classify this project", "appears in the doc repo. I asked on both their GitHub, Facebook page", "are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking technical issues on academic services are", "know where is the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project -", "of my question: > > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\")", "draft of my question: > > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities", "project, you will see that it tries really hard to serve people. I", "* Yes, because [questions asking technical issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now,", "of researching, not the content of research. Though I'm not completely convinced that", "not completely convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes tools of researching. It's more", "of researching\" includes tools of researching. It's more about the interactions with the", "is so resourceful and well documented that I really want to use it.", "on its effort to make tools, documentations and reports for others to use.", "this project is not a service, but if you spend some time to", "argument that asking about the tools it used is more about the processes", "you will see that it tries really hard to serve people. I must", "project is not a service, but if you spend some time to read", "that I really want to use it. Unfortunately, I still don't know where", "because [questions about the content of research and coursework rather than the processes", "[questions about the content of research and coursework rather than the processes of", "that I'm very impressed on its effort to make tools, documentations and reports", "researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking technical issues", "very impressed on its effort to make tools, documentations and reports for others", "its effort to make tools, documentations and reports for others to use. And", "services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that this project is not a", "to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization and yet", "project as a research, then I can make an argument that asking about", "are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that this project is not a service,", "a research, then I can make an argument that asking about the tools", "where is the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting", "say that I'm very impressed on its effort to make tools, documentations and", "and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking technical issues on academic", "\"Creating a Project - Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I", "Now, you may argue that this project is not a service, but if", "\"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful and well documented that", "research, then I can make an argument that asking about the tools it", "I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization and yet the", "it. Unfortunately, I still don't know where is the repo that the [Workspace", "asked on both their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but yet received a", "impressed on its effort to make tools, documentations and reports for others to", "GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but yet received a reply. > > >", "learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking technical issues on academic services", "some time to read about the project, you will see that it tries", "serve people. I must say that I'm very impressed on its effort to", "research and coursework rather than the processes of researching, teaching, and learning are", "this project as a research, then I can make an argument that asking", "spend some time to read about the project, you will see that it", "4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful and well documented that I really want", "I can make an argument that asking about the tools it used is", "to read about the project, you will see that it tries really hard", "on both their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but yet received a reply.", "– A 4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful and well documented that I", "Would this question be on-topic? * No, because [questions about the content of", "research. Though I'm not completely convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes tools of", "resourceful and well documented that I really want to use it. Unfortunately, I", "on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that this project is not a service, but", "asking technical issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that", "(WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful and well documented", "string only appears in the doc repo. I asked on both their GitHub,", "make an argument that asking about the tools it used is more about", "> > Would this question be on-topic? * No, because [questions about the", "[Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring", "the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\")", "with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in", "* No, because [questions about the content of research and coursework rather than", "because [questions asking technical issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may", "will see that it tries really hard to serve people. I must say", "effort to make tools, documentations and reports for others to use. And even", "the tools it used is more about the processes of researching, not the", "processes of researching, not the content of research. Though I'm not completely convinced", "but if you spend some time to read about the project, you will", "includes tools of researching. It's more about the interactions with the people and", "[`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file in the whole organization and yet the string only appears in", "academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue that this project is not", "> Would this question be on-topic? * No, because [questions about the content", "received a reply. > > > Would this question be on-topic? * No,", "can make an argument that asking about the tools it used is more", "of researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking technical", "\"processes of researching\" includes tools of researching. It's more about the interactions with", "is more about the processes of researching, not the content of research. Though", "the processes of researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions", "I'm very impressed on its effort to make tools, documentations and reports for", "coursework rather than the processes of researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? ", "researching\" includes tools of researching. It's more about the interactions with the people", "> The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A 4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful", "Here is the draft of my question: > > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S", "than the processes of researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? Yes, because", "that this project is not a service, but if you spend some time", "documented that I really want to use it. Unfortunately, I still don't know", "documentations and reports for others to use. And even if you still classify", "[questions asking technical issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)? Now, you may argue", "is not a service, but if you spend some time to read about", "make tools, documentations and reports for others to use. And even if you", "tools of researching. It's more about the interactions with the people and institutions", "the content of research and coursework rather than the processes of researching, teaching,", "Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search for the [`new_project.ipynb`](https://github.com/search?q=org%3Awhatevery1says+new_project.ipynb&type=code) file", "is the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting Started", "that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting Started with the WE1S", "A 4Humanities Project\") project is so resourceful and well documented that I really", "researching, not the content of research. Though I'm not completely convinced that \"processes", "this question be on-topic? * No, because [questions about the content of research", "documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to?", "then I can make an argument that asking about the tools it used", "tools it used is more about the processes of researching, not the content", "in the doc repo. I asked on both their GitHub, Facebook page and", "that \"processes of researching\" includes tools of researching. It's more about the interactions", "time to read about the project, you will see that it tries really", "still classify this project as a research, then I can make an argument", "not the content of research. Though I'm not completely convinced that \"processes of", "and well documented that I really want to use it. Unfortunately, I still", "repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a Project - Getting Started with the", "use it. Unfortunately, I still don't know where is the repo that the", "tries really hard to serve people. I must say that I'm very impressed", "I asked on both their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but yet received", "to serve people. I must say that I'm very impressed on its effort", "off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking technical issues on academic services are on-topic](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/q/4162/14341)?", "even if you still classify this project as a research, then I can", "Though I'm not completely convinced that \"processes of researching\" includes tools of researching.", "teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking technical issues on", "if you spend some time to read about the project, you will see", "a Project - Getting Started with the WE1S Workspace\") referring to? I search", "the draft of my question: > > The [WE1S (WhatEvery1Says)](https://we1s.ucsb.edu/ \"WE1S – A", "only appears in the doc repo. I asked on both their GitHub, Facebook", "the content of research. Though I'm not completely convinced that \"processes of researching\"", "both their GitHub, Facebook page and Twitter, but yet received a reply. >", "processes of researching, teaching, and learning are off-topic](https://academia.stackexchange.com/help/on-topic)? * Yes, because [questions asking", "still don't know where is the repo that the [Workspace documentation](https://whatevery1says.github.io/we1s-templates/creating-a-project/ \"Creating a", "the processes of researching, not the content of research. Though I'm not completely" ]
[ "numerous questions pop up that are spam. I flagged around 30 of them", "that in the past week or so, numerous questions pop up that are", "far (or more) but they keep popping up in the Questions section, shadowing", "that are indeed related to Academia. Is there a way to solve this", "the Questions section, shadowing proper questions users have that are indeed related to", "noticed that in the past week or so, numerous questions pop up that", "30 of them so far (or more) but they keep popping up in", "spam. I flagged around 30 of them so far (or more) but they", "shadowing proper questions users have that are indeed related to Academia. Is there", "in the past week or so, numerous questions pop up that are spam.", "them so far (or more) but they keep popping up in the Questions", "however, I've noticed that in the past week or so, numerous questions pop", "are spam. I flagged around 30 of them so far (or more) but", "but they keep popping up in the Questions section, shadowing proper questions users", "pop up that are spam. I flagged around 30 of them so far", "(or more) but they keep popping up in the Questions section, shadowing proper", "the past week or so, numerous questions pop up that are spam. I", "to Academia at all, however, I've noticed that in the past week or", "section, shadowing proper questions users have that are indeed related to Academia. Is", "I flagged around 30 of them so far (or more) but they keep", "are indeed related to Academia. Is there a way to solve this problem?", "past week or so, numerous questions pop up that are spam. I flagged", "I've noticed that in the past week or so, numerous questions pop up", "is not related to Academia at all, however, I've noticed that in the", "have that are indeed related to Academia. Is there a way to solve", "not related to Academia at all, however, I've noticed that in the past", "so, numerous questions pop up that are spam. I flagged around 30 of", "around 30 of them so far (or more) but they keep popping up", "up that are spam. I flagged around 30 of them so far (or", "users have that are indeed related to Academia. Is there a way to", "up in the Questions section, shadowing proper questions users have that are indeed", "related to Academia at all, however, I've noticed that in the past week", "of them so far (or more) but they keep popping up in the", "Questions section, shadowing proper questions users have that are indeed related to Academia.", "at all, however, I've noticed that in the past week or so, numerous", "week or so, numerous questions pop up that are spam. I flagged around", "all, however, I've noticed that in the past week or so, numerous questions", "that are spam. I flagged around 30 of them so far (or more)", "This is not related to Academia at all, however, I've noticed that in", "questions pop up that are spam. I flagged around 30 of them so", "so far (or more) but they keep popping up in the Questions section,", "proper questions users have that are indeed related to Academia. Is there a", "in the Questions section, shadowing proper questions users have that are indeed related", "popping up in the Questions section, shadowing proper questions users have that are", "flagged around 30 of them so far (or more) but they keep popping", "Academia at all, however, I've noticed that in the past week or so,", "more) but they keep popping up in the Questions section, shadowing proper questions", "they keep popping up in the Questions section, shadowing proper questions users have", "or so, numerous questions pop up that are spam. I flagged around 30", "keep popping up in the Questions section, shadowing proper questions users have that", "questions users have that are indeed related to Academia. Is there a way" ]
[ "been seeing way to many people editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing", "Even if you are on strike, don't do anything. But certainly don't upvote", "closing spam, and using the wrong flags for spam. So, this is a", "you are not on strike, flag spam, that's it. Even if you are", "many people editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and using the", "If you are not on strike, flag spam, that's it. Even if you", "spam, and using the wrong flags for spam. So, this is a reminder.", "the wrong flags for spam. So, this is a reminder. If you are", "on strike, flag spam, that's it. Even if you are on strike, don't", "people editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and using the wrong", "for spam. So, this is a reminder. If you are not on strike,", "spam, closing spam, and using the wrong flags for spam. So, this is", "way to many people editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and", "to many people editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and using", "So, this is a reminder. If you are not on strike, flag spam,", "I've been seeing way to many people editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam,", "that's it. Even if you are on strike, don't do anything. But certainly", "flags for spam. So, this is a reminder. If you are not on", "this is a reminder. If you are not on strike, flag spam, that's", "if you are on strike, don't do anything. But certainly don't upvote spam.", "spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and using the wrong flags for spam. So,", "spam. So, this is a reminder. If you are not on strike, flag", "spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and using the wrong flags for", "a reminder. If you are not on strike, flag spam, that's it. Even", "downvoting spam, closing spam, and using the wrong flags for spam. So, this", "upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and using the wrong flags for spam.", "are not on strike, flag spam, that's it. Even if you are on", "not on strike, flag spam, that's it. Even if you are on strike,", "is a reminder. If you are not on strike, flag spam, that's it.", "it. Even if you are on strike, don't do anything. But certainly don't", "and using the wrong flags for spam. So, this is a reminder. If", "flag spam, that's it. Even if you are on strike, don't do anything.", "editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam, and using the wrong flags", "reminder. If you are not on strike, flag spam, that's it. Even if", "seeing way to many people editing spam, upvoting spam, downvoting spam, closing spam,", "spam, that's it. Even if you are on strike, don't do anything. But", "using the wrong flags for spam. So, this is a reminder. If you", "wrong flags for spam. So, this is a reminder. If you are not", "strike, flag spam, that's it. Even if you are on strike, don't do" ]
[ "today there was a massive spam attack. One very disturbing thing that I", "I've seen it a bit on other sites too. So, this is a", "a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have a nice", "spam. This isn't actually only happening here, I've seen it a bit on", "I noticed was people upvoting spam. This isn't actually only happening here, I've", "sites too. So, this is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank", "reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have a nice (hopefully", "One very disturbing thing that I noticed was people upvoting spam. This isn't", "UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have a nice (hopefully spam free now) day.", "This isn't actually only happening here, I've seen it a bit on other", "noticed was people upvoting spam. This isn't actually only happening here, I've seen", "a bit on other sites too. So, this is a reminder. PLEASE DO", "there was a massive spam attack. One very disturbing thing that I noticed", "too. So, this is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you,", "So, this is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and", "seen it a bit on other sites too. So, this is a reminder.", "other sites too. So, this is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM!", "bit on other sites too. So, this is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT", "DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have a nice (hopefully spam free", "upvoting spam. This isn't actually only happening here, I've seen it a bit", "is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have a", "only happening here, I've seen it a bit on other sites too. So,", "PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have a nice (hopefully spam", "a massive spam attack. One very disturbing thing that I noticed was people", "very disturbing thing that I noticed was people upvoting spam. This isn't actually", "happening here, I've seen it a bit on other sites too. So, this", "disturbing thing that I noticed was people upvoting spam. This isn't actually only", "was a massive spam attack. One very disturbing thing that I noticed was", "people upvoting spam. This isn't actually only happening here, I've seen it a", "attack. One very disturbing thing that I noticed was people upvoting spam. This", "was people upvoting spam. This isn't actually only happening here, I've seen it", "this is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have", "that I noticed was people upvoting spam. This isn't actually only happening here,", "on other sites too. So, this is a reminder. PLEASE DO NOT UPVOTE", "here, I've seen it a bit on other sites too. So, this is", "actually only happening here, I've seen it a bit on other sites too.", "NOT UPVOTE SPAM! Thank you, and have a nice (hopefully spam free now)", "thing that I noticed was people upvoting spam. This isn't actually only happening", "isn't actually only happening here, I've seen it a bit on other sites", "it a bit on other sites too. So, this is a reminder. **PLEASE", "massive spam attack. One very disturbing thing that I noticed was people upvoting", "spam attack. One very disturbing thing that I noticed was people upvoting spam.", "Earlier today there was a massive spam attack. One very disturbing thing that" ]
[ "the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not a favourite topic around here", "it would merit the creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or a more general", "the context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly", "for questions about the use of AI tools in the context of academia).", "since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such questions, but", "the creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or a more general tag that can", "generally not a favourite topic around here (but still will probably only become", "[artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such questions, but only", "is explicitly not for such questions, but only for questions concerning the study", "the moment, there are 81 posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is", "tools in the context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\")", "would say it is enough traffic about the topic that it would merit", "questions, but only for questions concerning the study of or a career in", "'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such questions, but only for questions concerning the", "a favourite topic around here (but still will probably only become more relevant),", "it is enough traffic about the topic that it would merit the creation", "favourite topic around here (but still will probably only become more relevant), I", "enough traffic about the topic that it would merit the creation of a", "Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such questions,", "of a `chatgpt` tag (or a more general tag that can be used", "not a favourite topic around here (but still will probably only become more", "are 81 posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not a", "a `chatgpt` tag (or a more general tag that can be used for", "AI tools in the context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged", "general tag that can be used for questions about the use of AI", "Although it is generally not a favourite topic around here (but still will", "there are 81 posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not", "would merit the creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or a more general tag", "more relevant), I would say it is enough traffic about the topic that", "(or a more general tag that can be used for questions about the", "around here (but still will probably only become more relevant), I would say", "concerning the study of or a career in AI. [![enter image description here](https://i.stack.imgur.com/FQshb.png)](https://i.stack.imgur.com/FQshb.png)", "it is generally not a favourite topic around here (but still will probably", "topic that it would merit the creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or a", "that it would merit the creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or a more", "that can be used for questions about the use of AI tools in", "(but still will probably only become more relevant), I would say it is", "be used for questions about the use of AI tools in the context", "used for questions about the use of AI tools in the context of", "questions about the use of AI tools in the context of academia). Especially", "for questions concerning the study of or a career in AI. [![enter image", "will probably only become more relevant), I would say it is enough traffic", "tag that can be used for questions about the use of AI tools", "tag (or a more general tag that can be used for questions about", "is generally not a favourite topic around here (but still will probably only", "traffic about the topic that it would merit the creation of a `chatgpt`", "posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not a favourite topic", "`chatgpt` tag (or a more general tag that can be used for questions", "\"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not a favourite topic around here (but still", "At the moment, there are 81 posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it", "use of AI tools in the context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show", "\"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such questions, but only for", "such questions, but only for questions concerning the study of or a career", "only for questions concerning the study of or a career in AI. [![enter", "questions concerning the study of or a career in AI. [![enter image description", "with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not a favourite topic around", "become more relevant), I would say it is enough traffic about the topic", "a more general tag that can be used for questions about the use", "81 posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not a favourite", "the topic that it would merit the creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or", "tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such questions, but only for questions concerning", "more general tag that can be used for questions about the use of", "only become more relevant), I would say it is enough traffic about the", "for such questions, but only for questions concerning the study of or a", "about the topic that it would merit the creation of a `chatgpt` tag", "questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such questions, but only for questions", "here (but still will probably only become more relevant), I would say it", "of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for", "in the context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is", "topic around here (but still will probably only become more relevant), I would", "the use of AI tools in the context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence", "probably only become more relevant), I would say it is enough traffic about", "but only for questions concerning the study of or a career in AI.", "merit the creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or a more general tag that", "can be used for questions about the use of AI tools in the", "about the use of AI tools in the context of academia). Especially since", "relevant), I would say it is enough traffic about the topic that it", "not for such questions, but only for questions concerning the study of or", "moment, there are 81 posts with the phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally", "I would say it is enough traffic about the topic that it would", "academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not for such", "of AI tools in the context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions", "context of academia). Especially since [artificial-inteligence](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/artificial-inteligence \"show questions tagged 'artificial-inteligence'\") is explicitly not", "still will probably only become more relevant), I would say it is enough", "explicitly not for such questions, but only for questions concerning the study of", "phrase \"chatGPT\". Although it is generally not a favourite topic around here (but", "creation of a `chatgpt` tag (or a more general tag that can be", "say it is enough traffic about the topic that it would merit the", "is enough traffic about the topic that it would merit the creation of" ]
[ "moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work. Flags", "results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work. Flags raised during the strike will be", "the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work. Flags raised during the strike", "work. Flags raised during the strike will be handled over the next few", "strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847)", "[announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and", "Sutxecn says it all: the moderation strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators", "Flags raised during the strike will be handled over the next few days.", "back at work. Flags raised during the strike will be handled over the", "here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are", "satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work. Flags raised during", "are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work. Flags raised", "is over. We moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back", "We moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work.", "are back at work. Flags raised during the strike will be handled over", "and are back at work. Flags raised during the strike will be handled", "over. We moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at", "all: the moderation strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are satisfied with", "says it all: the moderation strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are", "with the [negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work. Flags raised during the", "at work. Flags raised during the strike will be handled over the next", "[negotiation results](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/391847) and are back at work. Flags raised during the strike will", "moderation strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are satisfied with the [negotiation", "the moderation strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are satisfied with the", "it all: the moderation strike [announced here](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/) is over. We moderators are satisfied" ]
[ "information here. Note: this was originally posted to the main site since the", "site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation", "it would be appropriate to post that information here. Note: this was originally", "suppressing meta posts about the strike. The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and", "when big changes are happening. But since [SE employees are taking it upon", "originally posted to the main site since the company's leadership was suppressing meta", "meta posts about the strike. The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so", "part of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently", "Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type", "There is currently a moderation strike on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which", "thought it would be appropriate to post that information here. Note: this was", "the company's leadership was suppressing meta posts about the strike. The strike has", "leadership was suppressing meta posts about the strike. The strike has since [finished", "upon themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I", "consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key information", "to move the post to meta so as to keep it around long-term", "happening. But since [SE employees are taking it upon themselves to circumvent the", "strike. The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided to", "[Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an)", "currently a moderation strike on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part", "network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its", "would be appropriate to post that information here. Note: this was originally posted", "Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack", "the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be appropriate to post that information", "ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key information about", "was originally posted to the main site since the company's leadership was suppressing", "to post that information here. Note: this was originally posted to the main", "move the post to meta so as to keep it around long-term without", "was suppressing meta posts about the strike. The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1),", "this type of key information about AC.SE would be posted in meta and", "in meta and featured on the main site. The community deserves to know", "since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided to move the post to", "the post to meta so as to keep it around long-term without introducing", "the main site. The community deserves to know when big changes are happening.", "type of key information about AC.SE would be posted in meta and featured", "mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key information about AC.SE", "Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow,", "big changes are happening. But since [SE employees are taking it upon themselves", "a moderation strike on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of", "main site since the company's leadership was suppressing meta posts about the strike.", "so as to keep it around long-term without introducing confusion on the main", "[Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike:", "company's leadership was suppressing meta posts about the strike. The strike has since", "and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key information about AC.SE would", "community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be appropriate", "be posted in meta and featured on the main site. The community deserves", "strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided to move the", "of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore,", "to know when big changes are happening. But since [SE employees are taking", "and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be appropriate to post", "strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign", "are taking it upon themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the", "AC.SE would be posted in meta and featured on the main site. The", "is part of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot", "know when big changes are happening. But since [SE employees are taking it", "post to meta so as to keep it around long-term without introducing confusion", "this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a moderation strike network-wide:", "that information here. Note: this was originally posted to the main site since", "strike on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a moderation", "malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key information about AC.SE would be", "post that information here. Note: this was originally posted to the main site", "moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and", "be appropriate to post that information here. Note: this was originally posted to", "Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of", "Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this", "site since the company's leadership was suppressing meta posts about the strike. The", "about the strike. The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have", "[SE employees are taking it upon themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and", "to meta so as to keep it around long-term without introducing confusion on", "volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key information about AC.SE would be posted in", "of key information about AC.SE would be posted in meta and featured on", "has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided to move the post", "successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided to move the post to meta so", "a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat,", "standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be appropriate to", "we have decided to move the post to meta so as to keep", "site. The community deserves to know when big changes are happening. But since", "meta and featured on the main site. The community deserves to know when", "[finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided to move the post to meta", "its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key information about AC.SE would be posted", "The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided to move", "decided to move the post to meta so as to keep it around", "to the main site since the company's leadership was suppressing meta posts about", "Which is part of a moderation strike network-wide: [Moderation Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc.", "Normally this type of key information about AC.SE would be posted in meta", "The community deserves to know when big changes are happening. But since [SE", "here. Note: this was originally posted to the main site since the company's", "featured on the main site. The community deserves to know when big changes", "posted to the main site since the company's leadership was suppressing meta posts", "since the company's leadership was suppressing meta posts about the strike. The strike", "Strike: Stack Overflow, Inc. cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally", "about AC.SE would be posted in meta and featured on the main site.", "this was originally posted to the main site since the company's leadership was", "on the main site. The community deserves to know when big changes are", "themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought", "tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be appropriate to post that information here. Note:", "have decided to move the post to meta so as to keep it", "community deserves to know when big changes are happening. But since [SE employees", "the main site since the company's leadership was suppressing meta posts about the", "posted in meta and featured on the main site. The community deserves to", "to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it", "I thought it would be appropriate to post that information here. Note: this", "as to keep it around long-term without introducing confusion on the main site.", "meta so as to keep it around long-term without introducing confusion on the", "key information about AC.SE would be posted in meta and featured on the", "are happening. But since [SE employees are taking it upon themselves to circumvent", "employees are taking it upon themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing", "moderation strike on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a", "the strike. The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we have decided", "But since [SE employees are taking it upon themselves to circumvent the community", "is currently a moderation strike on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is", "it upon themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions),", "on this site: [Academia.SE Moderation Strike](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5286/academia-se-moderation-strike) Which is part of a moderation strike", "cannot consistently ignore, mistreat, and malign its volunteers](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389811/moderation-strike-stack-overflow-inc-cannot-consistently-ignore-mistreat-an) Normally this type of key", "the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be", "and featured on the main site. The community deserves to know when big", "circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would", "[removing the featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be appropriate to post that", "and so we have decided to move the post to meta so as", "appropriate to post that information here. Note: this was originally posted to the", "taking it upon themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe), and [removing the featured", "since [SE employees are taking it upon themselves to circumvent the community standards](https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/389843/why-is-se-staff-violating-se-policy-by-un-featuring-posts-about-the-strike-on-pe),", "posts about the strike. The strike has since [finished successfully](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/5329/moderation-strike-is-over?cb=1), and so we", "information about AC.SE would be posted in meta and featured on the main", "Note: this was originally posted to the main site since the company's leadership", "changes are happening. But since [SE employees are taking it upon themselves to", "featured tag](https://academia.meta.stackexchange.com/posts/5286/revisions), I thought it would be appropriate to post that information here.", "so we have decided to move the post to meta so as to", "main site. The community deserves to know when big changes are happening. But", "would be posted in meta and featured on the main site. The community", "deserves to know when big changes are happening. But since [SE employees are" ]
[ "I posted the question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a", "textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received zero upvotes and", "the question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a way to", "ago, I posted the question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find", "don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a way to prevent resale, without", "to prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears", "a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received zero upvotes and one downvote. What", "Not too long ago, I posted the question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\"", "\" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a way to prevent resale, without requiring", "long ago, I posted the question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers", "What are your thoughts about the question? Is there anything I can do", "your thoughts about the question? Is there anything I can do to possibly", "self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received zero upvotes and one", "about the question? Is there anything I can do to possibly improve it?", "posted the question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a way", "year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received zero upvotes and one downvote. What are", "are your thoughts about the question? Is there anything I can do to", "way to prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It", "to have received zero upvotes and one downvote. What are your thoughts about", "zero upvotes and one downvote. What are your thoughts about the question? Is", "automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received zero upvotes", "have received zero upvotes and one downvote. What are your thoughts about the", "without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received", "prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to", "[Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a way to prevent resale,", "resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have", "It appears to have received zero upvotes and one downvote. What are your", "appears to have received zero upvotes and one downvote. What are your thoughts", "textbook publishers find a way to prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction", "after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received zero upvotes and one downvote.", "requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale) It appears to have received zero", "question? Is there anything I can do to possibly improve it? Thank you!", "received zero upvotes and one downvote. What are your thoughts about the question?", "find a way to prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a", "'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a way to prevent resale, without requiring automatic", "access\" textbook publishers find a way to prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook", "question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook publishers find a way to prevent", "a way to prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after a year?](https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/200918/why-dont-inclusive-access-textbook-publishers-find-a-way-to-prevent-resale)", "publishers find a way to prevent resale, without requiring automatic textbook self-destruction after", "upvotes and one downvote. What are your thoughts about the question? Is there", "the question? Is there anything I can do to possibly improve it? Thank", "downvote. What are your thoughts about the question? Is there anything I can", "thoughts about the question? Is there anything I can do to possibly improve", "and one downvote. What are your thoughts about the question? Is there anything", "one downvote. What are your thoughts about the question? Is there anything I", "too long ago, I posted the question: [Why don't \" 'inclusive' access\" textbook" ]
[ "I do not think a word limit is useful, as in some cases", "increase in very long, very, very detailed posts, often not even formatted but", "popping up along the lines of > > Your post is very long.", "be too long and that they should try to shorten their question? I", "post is very long. If possible, try to keep it short and concise", "I have the feeling that there is an increase in very long, very,", "posts tend to be unanswerable because they are dependent on individual factors. It", "cases people might really do need such long questions. Just a short message", "there any way to add a pop-up that tells askers that their question", "askers that their question might be too long and that they should try", "very, very detailed posts, often not even formatted but wall-of-text style. I often", "it's just me, but I have the feeling that there is an increase", "to add a pop-up that tells askers that their question might be too", "in some cases people might really do need such long questions. Just a", "up along the lines of > > Your post is very long. If", "keep it short and concise to increase the chance of good answers. >", "formatted but wall-of-text style. I often stop reading midway through because it is", "is very long. If possible, try to keep it short and concise to", "very difficult to find the actual issue OP is inquiring about within the", "within the convoluted heaps of texts. And more often than not, those overly", "individual factors. It often feels like people just need a place to tell", "those overly long posts tend to be unanswerable because they are dependent on", "issue OP is inquiring about within the convoluted heaps of texts. And more", "try to keep it short and concise to increase the chance of good", "be unanswerable because they are dependent on individual factors. It often feels like", "tend to be unanswerable because they are dependent on individual factors. It often", "such long questions. Just a short message popping up along the lines of", "feeling that there is an increase in very long, very, very detailed posts,", "possible, try to keep it short and concise to increase the chance of", "actual issue OP is inquiring about within the convoluted heaps of texts. And", "because it is very difficult to find the actual issue OP is inquiring", "place to tell their story. Is there any way to add a pop-up", "tells askers that their question might be too long and that they should", "factors. It often feels like people just need a place to tell their", "should try to shorten their question? I do not think a word limit", "I often stop reading midway through because it is very difficult to find", "have the feeling that there is an increase in very long, very, very", "their story. Is there any way to add a pop-up that tells askers", "and that they should try to shorten their question? I do not think", "is useful, as in some cases people might really do need such long", "midway through because it is very difficult to find the actual issue OP", "Maybe it's just me, but I have the feeling that there is an", "their question might be too long and that they should try to shorten", "that there is an increase in very long, very, very detailed posts, often", "there is an increase in very long, very, very detailed posts, often not", "shorten their question? I do not think a word limit is useful, as", "often stop reading midway through because it is very difficult to find the", "because they are dependent on individual factors. It often feels like people just", "often than not, those overly long posts tend to be unanswerable because they", "And more often than not, those overly long posts tend to be unanswerable", "need such long questions. Just a short message popping up along the lines", "do need such long questions. Just a short message popping up along the", "Your post is very long. If possible, try to keep it short and", "is very difficult to find the actual issue OP is inquiring about within", "inquiring about within the convoluted heaps of texts. And more often than not,", "add a pop-up that tells askers that their question might be too long", "way to add a pop-up that tells askers that their question might be", "along the lines of > > Your post is very long. If possible,", "not, those overly long posts tend to be unanswerable because they are dependent", "the actual issue OP is inquiring about within the convoluted heaps of texts.", "difficult to find the actual issue OP is inquiring about within the convoluted", "the feeling that there is an increase in very long, very, very detailed", "stop reading midway through because it is very difficult to find the actual", "any way to add a pop-up that tells askers that their question might", "is an increase in very long, very, very detailed posts, often not even", "need a place to tell their story. Is there any way to add", "lines of > > Your post is very long. If possible, try to", "are dependent on individual factors. It often feels like people just need a", "it short and concise to increase the chance of good answers. > >", "not even formatted but wall-of-text style. I often stop reading midway through because", "unanswerable because they are dependent on individual factors. It often feels like people", "it is very difficult to find the actual issue OP is inquiring about", "people might really do need such long questions. Just a short message popping", "very long. If possible, try to keep it short and concise to increase", "often not even formatted but wall-of-text style. I often stop reading midway through", "long posts tend to be unanswerable because they are dependent on individual factors.", "OP is inquiring about within the convoluted heaps of texts. And more often", "to find the actual issue OP is inquiring about within the convoluted heaps", "short and concise to increase the chance of good answers. > > >", "some cases people might really do need such long questions. Just a short", "detailed posts, often not even formatted but wall-of-text style. I often stop reading", "people just need a place to tell their story. Is there any way", "like people just need a place to tell their story. Is there any", "short message popping up along the lines of > > Your post is", "word limit is useful, as in some cases people might really do need", "a pop-up that tells askers that their question might be too long and", "questions. Just a short message popping up along the lines of > >", "think a word limit is useful, as in some cases people might really", "message popping up along the lines of > > Your post is very", "a place to tell their story. Is there any way to add a", "question? I do not think a word limit is useful, as in some", "style. I often stop reading midway through because it is very difficult to", "very long, very, very detailed posts, often not even formatted but wall-of-text style.", "might be too long and that they should try to shorten their question?", "might really do need such long questions. Just a short message popping up", "is inquiring about within the convoluted heaps of texts. And more often than", "just need a place to tell their story. Is there any way to", "very detailed posts, often not even formatted but wall-of-text style. I often stop", "in very long, very, very detailed posts, often not even formatted but wall-of-text", "It often feels like people just need a place to tell their story.", "pop-up that tells askers that their question might be too long and that", "but I have the feeling that there is an increase in very long,", "wall-of-text style. I often stop reading midway through because it is very difficult", "that their question might be too long and that they should try to", "an increase in very long, very, very detailed posts, often not even formatted", "on individual factors. It often feels like people just need a place to", "they should try to shorten their question? I do not think a word", "dependent on individual factors. It often feels like people just need a place", "long questions. Just a short message popping up along the lines of >", "the convoluted heaps of texts. And more often than not, those overly long", "even formatted but wall-of-text style. I often stop reading midway through because it", "that they should try to shorten their question? I do not think a", "but wall-of-text style. I often stop reading midway through because it is very", "long and that they should try to shorten their question? I do not", "as in some cases people might really do need such long questions. Just", "than not, those overly long posts tend to be unanswerable because they are", "question might be too long and that they should try to shorten their", "Just a short message popping up along the lines of > > Your", "a short message popping up along the lines of > > Your post", "they are dependent on individual factors. It often feels like people just need", "> Your post is very long. If possible, try to keep it short", "of > > Your post is very long. If possible, try to keep", "their question? I do not think a word limit is useful, as in", "to keep it short and concise to increase the chance of good answers.", "> > Your post is very long. If possible, try to keep it", "about within the convoluted heaps of texts. And more often than not, those", "a word limit is useful, as in some cases people might really do", "story. Is there any way to add a pop-up that tells askers that", "long. If possible, try to keep it short and concise to increase the", "reading midway through because it is very difficult to find the actual issue", "texts. And more often than not, those overly long posts tend to be", "just me, but I have the feeling that there is an increase in", "often feels like people just need a place to tell their story. Is", "posts, often not even formatted but wall-of-text style. I often stop reading midway", "more often than not, those overly long posts tend to be unanswerable because", "limit is useful, as in some cases people might really do need such", "useful, as in some cases people might really do need such long questions.", "to be unanswerable because they are dependent on individual factors. It often feels", "too long and that they should try to shorten their question? I do", "convoluted heaps of texts. And more often than not, those overly long posts", "really do need such long questions. Just a short message popping up along", "find the actual issue OP is inquiring about within the convoluted heaps of", "tell their story. Is there any way to add a pop-up that tells", "of texts. And more often than not, those overly long posts tend to", "to shorten their question? I do not think a word limit is useful,", "Is there any way to add a pop-up that tells askers that their", "through because it is very difficult to find the actual issue OP is", "heaps of texts. And more often than not, those overly long posts tend", "try to shorten their question? I do not think a word limit is", "that tells askers that their question might be too long and that they", "If possible, try to keep it short and concise to increase the chance", "not think a word limit is useful, as in some cases people might", "overly long posts tend to be unanswerable because they are dependent on individual", "do not think a word limit is useful, as in some cases people", "feels like people just need a place to tell their story. Is there", "to tell their story. Is there any way to add a pop-up that", "long, very, very detailed posts, often not even formatted but wall-of-text style. I", "me, but I have the feeling that there is an increase in very", "the lines of > > Your post is very long. If possible, try" ]
[ "have to apply for, in order to work as an academic in Japan", "What kind of visa class do I have to apply for, in order", "visa class do I have to apply for, in order to work as", "As from title. What kind of visa class do I have to apply", "I have to apply for, in order to work as an academic in", "do I have to apply for, in order to work as an academic", "from title. What kind of visa class do I have to apply for,", "title. What kind of visa class do I have to apply for, in", "kind of visa class do I have to apply for, in order to", "of visa class do I have to apply for, in order to work", "class do I have to apply for, in order to work as an", "to apply for, in order to work as an academic in Japan ?" ]
[ "available for job search at the Ph.D. level in the computational chemistry field?", "are available for job search at the Ph.D. level in the computational chemistry", "Which online resources are available for job search at the Ph.D. level in", "resources are available for job search at the Ph.D. level in the computational", "online resources are available for job search at the Ph.D. level in the" ]
[ "all journals provide the impact factor on their homepage. For those who don't", "impact factor on their homepage. For those who don't where can I find", "factor on their homepage. For those who don't where can I find their", "journals provide the impact factor on their homepage. For those who don't where", "Not all journals provide the impact factor on their homepage. For those who", "the impact factor on their homepage. For those who don't where can I", "homepage. For those who don't where can I find their impact factor ?", "provide the impact factor on their homepage. For those who don't where can", "As from title. Not all journals provide the impact factor on their homepage.", "on their homepage. For those who don't where can I find their impact", "their homepage. For those who don't where can I find their impact factor", "title. Not all journals provide the impact factor on their homepage. For those", "from title. Not all journals provide the impact factor on their homepage. For" ]
[ "I have seen many engineering departments want professional engineer registration. Why do they", "have seen many engineering departments want professional engineer registration. Why do they care?" ]
[ "can I guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards? Am I unable to", "publish a pre-print paper on arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive rights to", "pre-print paper on arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher", "unable to publish on non-open access journals after I publish a pre-print on", "how can I guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards? Am I unable", "to the publisher afterwards? Am I unable to publish on non-open access journals", "a pre-print paper on arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive rights to the", "I guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards? Am I unable to publish", "I unable to publish on non-open access journals after I publish a pre-print", "arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards? Am I", "exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards? Am I unable to publish on non-open", "the publisher afterwards? Am I unable to publish on non-open access journals after", "paper on arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards?", "publisher afterwards? Am I unable to publish on non-open access journals after I", "rights to the publisher afterwards? Am I unable to publish on non-open access", "publish on non-open access journals after I publish a pre-print on arXiv ?", "afterwards? Am I unable to publish on non-open access journals after I publish", "to publish on non-open access journals after I publish a pre-print on arXiv", "Am I unable to publish on non-open access journals after I publish a", "If I publish a pre-print paper on arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive", "guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards? Am I unable to publish on", "I publish a pre-print paper on arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive rights", "on arXiv, how can I guarantee exclusive rights to the publisher afterwards? Am" ]
[ "anybody know where I can find a list of journals/publishers that do not", "journal or pay a fee. Does anybody know where I can find a", "fee. Does anybody know where I can find a list of journals/publishers that", "funding organizations require publications on the research that they fund to be open", "pay a fee. Does anybody know where I can find a list of", "Does anybody know where I can find a list of journals/publishers that do", "can find a list of journals/publishers that do not allow material that they", "to be open access, i.e. available to the public without having to subscribe", "a fee. Does anybody know where I can find a list of journals/publishers", "fund to be open access, i.e. available to the public without having to", "public without having to subscribe to a journal or pay a fee. Does", "a journal or pay a fee. Does anybody know where I can find", "i.e. available to the public without having to subscribe to a journal or", "access, i.e. available to the public without having to subscribe to a journal", "list of journals/publishers that do not allow material that they publish to be", "subscribe to a journal or pay a fee. Does anybody know where I", "a list of journals/publishers that do not allow material that they publish to", "of funding organizations require publications on the research that they fund to be", "of journals/publishers that do not allow material that they publish to be published", "the public without having to subscribe to a journal or pay a fee.", "increasing number of funding organizations require publications on the research that they fund", "organizations require publications on the research that they fund to be open access,", "require publications on the research that they fund to be open access, i.e.", "that they fund to be open access, i.e. available to the public without", "number of funding organizations require publications on the research that they fund to", "to subscribe to a journal or pay a fee. Does anybody know where", "I can find a list of journals/publishers that do not allow material that", "that do not allow material that they publish to be published this way?", "publications on the research that they fund to be open access, i.e. available", "without having to subscribe to a journal or pay a fee. Does anybody", "open access, i.e. available to the public without having to subscribe to a", "journals/publishers that do not allow material that they publish to be published this", "they fund to be open access, i.e. available to the public without having", "on the research that they fund to be open access, i.e. available to", "the research that they fund to be open access, i.e. available to the", "to a journal or pay a fee. Does anybody know where I can", "where I can find a list of journals/publishers that do not allow material", "An increasing number of funding organizations require publications on the research that they", "be open access, i.e. available to the public without having to subscribe to", "available to the public without having to subscribe to a journal or pay", "to the public without having to subscribe to a journal or pay a", "having to subscribe to a journal or pay a fee. Does anybody know", "research that they fund to be open access, i.e. available to the public", "find a list of journals/publishers that do not allow material that they publish", "or pay a fee. Does anybody know where I can find a list", "know where I can find a list of journals/publishers that do not allow" ]
[ "least possible to steer the measures away from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed", "to steer the measures away from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that", "unwise to fight 'being measured', it is at least possible to steer the", "in some vain attempt to get objective measures. Although it is unwise to", "those. What I want is pointers to the research behind the scientific validity", "attempt to get objective measures. Although it is unwise to fight 'being measured',", "like it or not, modern academia is increasingly being measured, in some vain", "for those. What I want is pointers to the research behind the scientific", "to fight 'being measured', it is at least possible to steer the measures", "behind the scientific validity of those metrics. So the question is: where should", "by peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably. There are a lot of different", "is increasingly being measured, in some vain attempt to get objective measures. Although", "validity of those metrics. So the question is: where should I look for", "increasingly being measured, in some vain attempt to get objective measures. Although it", "those metrics. So the question is: where should I look for scientific assessments", "I want is pointers to the research behind the scientific validity of those", "not, modern academia is increasingly being measured, in some vain attempt to get", "steer the measures away from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes", "measures away from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably.", "fight 'being measured', it is at least possible to steer the measures away", "peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably. There are a lot of different metrics", "research that establishes this unrefutably. There are a lot of different metrics that", "So the question is: where should I look for scientific assessments of bibliometrics?", "objective measures. Although it is unwise to fight 'being measured', it is at", "this unrefutably. There are a lot of different metrics that have been defined", "of those metrics. So the question is: where should I look for scientific", "get objective measures. Although it is unwise to fight 'being measured', it is", "it is unwise to fight 'being measured', it is at least possible to", "What I want is pointers to the research behind the scientific validity of", "vain attempt to get objective measures. Although it is unwise to fight 'being", "the research behind the scientific validity of those metrics. So the question is:", "it is at least possible to steer the measures away from meaningless ones,", "away from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably. There", "some vain attempt to get objective measures. Although it is unwise to fight", "possible to steer the measures away from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research", "lot of different metrics that have been defined - I am not looking", "a lot of different metrics that have been defined - I am not", "There are a lot of different metrics that have been defined - I", "pointers to the research behind the scientific validity of those metrics. So the", "scientific validity of those metrics. So the question is: where should I look", "- I am not looking for those. What I want is pointers to", "defined - I am not looking for those. What I want is pointers", "ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably. There are a lot", "not looking for those. What I want is pointers to the research behind", "establishes this unrefutably. There are a lot of different metrics that have been", "metrics. So the question is: where should I look for scientific assessments of", "that have been defined - I am not looking for those. What I", "from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably. There are", "meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably. There are a", "Whether we like it or not, modern academia is increasingly being measured, in", "to get objective measures. Although it is unwise to fight 'being measured', it", "have been defined - I am not looking for those. What I want", "is pointers to the research behind the scientific validity of those metrics. So", "different metrics that have been defined - I am not looking for those.", "am not looking for those. What I want is pointers to the research", "research behind the scientific validity of those metrics. So the question is: where", "looking for those. What I want is pointers to the research behind the", "is unwise to fight 'being measured', it is at least possible to steer", "measured, in some vain attempt to get objective measures. Although it is unwise", "metrics that have been defined - I am not looking for those. What", "'being measured', it is at least possible to steer the measures away from", "is at least possible to steer the measures away from meaningless ones, backed", "being measured, in some vain attempt to get objective measures. Although it is", "backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes this unrefutably. There are a lot of", "the scientific validity of those metrics. So the question is: where should I", "of different metrics that have been defined - I am not looking for", "or not, modern academia is increasingly being measured, in some vain attempt to", "measured', it is at least possible to steer the measures away from meaningless", "to the research behind the scientific validity of those metrics. So the question", "want is pointers to the research behind the scientific validity of those metrics.", "it or not, modern academia is increasingly being measured, in some vain attempt", "academia is increasingly being measured, in some vain attempt to get objective measures.", "I am not looking for those. What I want is pointers to the", "unrefutably. There are a lot of different metrics that have been defined -", "at least possible to steer the measures away from meaningless ones, backed by", "are a lot of different metrics that have been defined - I am", "measures. Although it is unwise to fight 'being measured', it is at least", "we like it or not, modern academia is increasingly being measured, in some", "Although it is unwise to fight 'being measured', it is at least possible", "that establishes this unrefutably. There are a lot of different metrics that have", "been defined - I am not looking for those. What I want is", "the measures away from meaningless ones, backed by peer-reviewed research that establishes this", "modern academia is increasingly being measured, in some vain attempt to get objective" ]
[ "the evaluators of the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics ? How", "are the evaluators of the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics ?", "the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics ? How are they selected", "Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics ? How are they selected ?", "of the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics ? How are they", "evaluators of the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics ? How are", "Who are the evaluators of the Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship proposals? Other academics" ]
[ "look into each program? * No program offers funding, and some programs are", "funding, and some programs are elegible for a local scholarship. * I can", "a local scholarship. * I can fund some programs with my own money.", "offers funding, and some programs are elegible for a local scholarship. * I", "received several acceptance letters. Now I have the problem to select one of", "letters. Now I have the problem to select one of those programs. How", "(MSc) programs overseas, and I've received several acceptance letters. Now I have the", "have the problem to select one of those programs. How should I do", "programs are elegible for a local scholarship. * I can fund some programs", "should I do it? What should I look into each program? * No", "I have the problem to select one of those programs. How should I", "those programs. How should I do it? What should I look into each", "What should I look into each program? * No program offers funding, and", "I look into each program? * No program offers funding, and some programs", "and I've received several acceptance letters. Now I have the problem to select", "do it? What should I look into each program? * No program offers", "several acceptance letters. Now I have the problem to select one of those", "some programs are elegible for a local scholarship. * I can fund some", "and some programs are elegible for a local scholarship. * I can fund", "programs overseas, and I've received several acceptance letters. Now I have the problem", "one of those programs. How should I do it? What should I look", "applied to several graduate (MSc) programs overseas, and I've received several acceptance letters.", "I've applied to several graduate (MSc) programs overseas, and I've received several acceptance", "program offers funding, and some programs are elegible for a local scholarship. ", "problem to select one of those programs. How should I do it? What", "No program offers funding, and some programs are elegible for a local scholarship.", "Now I have the problem to select one of those programs. How should", "graduate (MSc) programs overseas, and I've received several acceptance letters. Now I have", "several graduate (MSc) programs overseas, and I've received several acceptance letters. Now I", "I've received several acceptance letters. Now I have the problem to select one", "overseas, and I've received several acceptance letters. Now I have the problem to", "it? What should I look into each program? No program offers funding,", "elegible for a local scholarship. * I can fund some programs with my", "program? * No program offers funding, and some programs are elegible for a", "acceptance letters. Now I have the problem to select one of those programs.", "to select one of those programs. How should I do it? What should", "of those programs. How should I do it? What should I look into", "are elegible for a local scholarship. * I can fund some programs with", "the problem to select one of those programs. How should I do it?", "How should I do it? What should I look into each program? ", "programs. How should I do it? What should I look into each program?", "to several graduate (MSc) programs overseas, and I've received several acceptance letters. Now", "should I look into each program? No program offers funding, and some", "each program? * No program offers funding, and some programs are elegible for", "for a local scholarship. * I can fund some programs with my own", "I do it? What should I look into each program? * No program", "select one of those programs. How should I do it? What should I", "* No program offers funding, and some programs are elegible for a local", "into each program? * No program offers funding, and some programs are elegible" ]
[ "publish a book on my research topics while employed for an academic institution,", "Europe, but if someone knows also for other countries, I will welcome additional", "get from royalties ? My question is relative to Europe, but if someone", "to Europe, but if someone knows also for other countries, I will welcome", "the revenues I get from royalties ? My question is relative to Europe,", "royalties ? My question is relative to Europe, but if someone knows also", "on my research topics while employed for an academic institution, can they claim", "of the revenues I get from royalties ? My question is relative to", "If I publish a book on my research topics while employed for an", "topics while employed for an academic institution, can they claim part of the", "claim part of the revenues I get from royalties ? My question is", "employed for an academic institution, can they claim part of the revenues I", "an academic institution, can they claim part of the revenues I get from", "academic institution, can they claim part of the revenues I get from royalties", "while employed for an academic institution, can they claim part of the revenues", "book on my research topics while employed for an academic institution, can they", "they claim part of the revenues I get from royalties ? My question", "question is relative to Europe, but if someone knows also for other countries,", "? My question is relative to Europe, but if someone knows also for", "a book on my research topics while employed for an academic institution, can", "part of the revenues I get from royalties ? My question is relative", "my research topics while employed for an academic institution, can they claim part", "from royalties ? My question is relative to Europe, but if someone knows", "I get from royalties ? My question is relative to Europe, but if", "research topics while employed for an academic institution, can they claim part of", "for an academic institution, can they claim part of the revenues I get", "can they claim part of the revenues I get from royalties ? My", "institution, can they claim part of the revenues I get from royalties ?", "relative to Europe, but if someone knows also for other countries, I will", "revenues I get from royalties ? My question is relative to Europe, but", "is relative to Europe, but if someone knows also for other countries, I", "but if someone knows also for other countries, I will welcome additional answers.", "My question is relative to Europe, but if someone knows also for other", "I publish a book on my research topics while employed for an academic" ]
[ "help to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds good,", "of the students actually pursue this track? Does anyone know of data about", "Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs to create a group of researchers", "funds Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs to create", "researchers whose work more rapidly effects medical practice. For example, they would help", "also known as MD/PhD programs to create a group of researchers whose work", "as MD/PhD programs to create a group of researchers whose work more rapidly", "would help to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds", "of Health (NIH) funds Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD", "group of researchers whose work more rapidly effects medical practice. For example, they", "(NIH) funds Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs to", "a group of researchers whose work more rapidly effects medical practice. For example,", "surgical procedures. It sounds good, but how many of the students actually pursue", "the students actually pursue this track? Does anyone know of data about the", "the NIH's return on investment besides the somewhat dated data about three New", "or surgical procedures. It sounds good, but how many of the students actually", "know of data about the NIH's return on investment besides the somewhat dated", "to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds good, but", "effects medical practice. For example, they would help to develop new diagnostic tools,", "For example, they would help to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical", "National Institues of Health (NIH) funds Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known", "Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs to create a group of", "somewhat dated data about three New York programs? Thanks for your time, Ciwe", "about the NIH's return on investment besides the somewhat dated data about three", "actually pursue this track? Does anyone know of data about the NIH's return", "create a group of researchers whose work more rapidly effects medical practice. For", "The National Institues of Health (NIH) funds Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also", "Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs to create a", "programs to create a group of researchers whose work more rapidly effects medical", "whose work more rapidly effects medical practice. For example, they would help to", "procedures. It sounds good, but how many of the students actually pursue this", "but how many of the students actually pursue this track? Does anyone know", "investment besides the somewhat dated data about three New York programs? Thanks for", "sounds good, but how many of the students actually pursue this track? Does", "of data about the NIH's return on investment besides the somewhat dated data", "known as MD/PhD programs to create a group of researchers whose work more", "medical practice. For example, they would help to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs,", "Health (NIH) funds Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs", "they would help to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It", "how many of the students actually pursue this track? Does anyone know of", "Does anyone know of data about the NIH's return on investment besides the", "NIH's return on investment besides the somewhat dated data about three New York", "Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs to create a group", "work more rapidly effects medical practice. For example, they would help to develop", "Institues of Health (NIH) funds Medical Scientist Training Programs (MSTPs) also known as", "practice. For example, they would help to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or", "good, but how many of the students actually pursue this track? Does anyone", "this track? Does anyone know of data about the NIH's return on investment", "diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds good, but how many of", "anyone know of data about the NIH's return on investment besides the somewhat", "drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds good, but how many of the students", "more rapidly effects medical practice. For example, they would help to develop new", "new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds good, but how many", "MD/PhD programs to create a group of researchers whose work more rapidly effects", "to create a group of researchers whose work more rapidly effects medical practice.", "develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds good, but how", "of researchers whose work more rapidly effects medical practice. For example, they would", "students actually pursue this track? Does anyone know of data about the NIH's", "example, they would help to develop new diagnostic tools, drugs, or surgical procedures.", "data about the NIH's return on investment besides the somewhat dated data about", "the somewhat dated data about three New York programs? Thanks for your time,", "many of the students actually pursue this track? Does anyone know of data", "track? Does anyone know of data about the NIH's return on investment besides", "besides the somewhat dated data about three New York programs? Thanks for your", "return on investment besides the somewhat dated data about three New York programs?", "pursue this track? Does anyone know of data about the NIH's return on", "(MSTPs) also known as MD/PhD programs to create a group of researchers whose", "tools, drugs, or surgical procedures. It sounds good, but how many of the", "rapidly effects medical practice. For example, they would help to develop new diagnostic", "It sounds good, but how many of the students actually pursue this track?", "on investment besides the somewhat dated data about three New York programs? Thanks" ]
[ "a good source to compare academic salaries at European universities? For example, what", "what are the salaries of full professors in different countries? I would particularly", "at European universities? For example, what are the salaries of full professors in", "particularly welcome a possible source, a link pointing to a page where this", "in different countries? I would particularly welcome a possible source, a link pointing", "good source to compare academic salaries at European universities? For example, what are", "countries? I would particularly welcome a possible source, a link pointing to a", "a possible source, a link pointing to a page where this information is", "source to compare academic salaries at European universities? For example, what are the", "salaries at European universities? For example, what are the salaries of full professors", "to compare academic salaries at European universities? For example, what are the salaries", "academic salaries at European universities? For example, what are the salaries of full", "salaries of full professors in different countries? I would particularly welcome a possible", "full professors in different countries? I would particularly welcome a possible source, a", "I would particularly welcome a possible source, a link pointing to a page", "For example, what are the salaries of full professors in different countries? I", "European universities? For example, what are the salaries of full professors in different", "Is there a good source to compare academic salaries at European universities? For", "would particularly welcome a possible source, a link pointing to a page where", "universities? For example, what are the salaries of full professors in different countries?", "welcome a possible source, a link pointing to a page where this information", "the salaries of full professors in different countries? I would particularly welcome a", "compare academic salaries at European universities? For example, what are the salaries of", "professors in different countries? I would particularly welcome a possible source, a link", "different countries? I would particularly welcome a possible source, a link pointing to", "there a good source to compare academic salaries at European universities? For example,", "example, what are the salaries of full professors in different countries? I would", "are the salaries of full professors in different countries? I would particularly welcome", "of full professors in different countries? I would particularly welcome a possible source,", "possible source, a link pointing to a page where this information is available." ]