Split (2)

train · 5.42k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Is Facial Action Coding System valuable to students? Do you even know what a Facial Action Coding System is? Well, it is a program or a system that was made from codes to help a computer identify human emotions. Well, I think that the Facial Action Coding System is valuable to students. The reason I think this is because your video games could have more expressive faces, your PC at home can't handle the complex algorithms, and it can reconize when a student is becoming confused or bored.\n\nThe first reason is that your video game could have more expressive faces. Some people enjoy playing video games a lot but what is the point in having this fun video game if your going to have faces that look like they are mad in the game. If the charcaters in game could show expression I think it would make a lot more people into the game. If more people like the video games just because they got expressions then a lot of more people will start buying games. Which means that the gaming stores will get more money, and then the government would get more money. So in conlcusion one of the reasons why it is valuable to kids is because it could make video game charcaters have expressions.\n\nThe next reason is that your PC at home can't handle the complex algorithms. The computer system that was designed by Prof. Thomas Huang made the program for a sufficicated computer that can handle the algorithms. Your PC at home was designed not to hold complex stuff on it, it was designed to hold simple stuff. So, if a teacher got this in their classroom then it could benefit the kids and they would probably have a PC that could hold the complex algorithms unlike the ones at the kids home. Therefore, another reason is that your home PC can't handle the complex algorithms.\n\nThe last reason is that a classroom computer could reconize when a student is becoming confused or bored. Having this system on a classroom computer would help the kids out a lot. The reason I say that is because what if there is a kid strugggling really bad to understand the problem they are working on but are too shy and embarassed to ask the teacher for help. What are they going to do then, just take a bad grade and deal with? But, if they have the system on the computers in their classroom then the computer can just read their facial expression, see they are confused, and then help them by pulling up a helpful website. Also if the kid is bored and the computer reads that then they can pull up a helpful website for the material that they are working on but is also a website that they can play games on. This shows that the coding system also can help students in a classroom if they are bored or confused.\n\nIn conclusion the Facial Action Coding System is valuable to students in a classroom because your video games could have more expressive faces, your PC at home can't handle the complex algorithms, and it can reconize when a student is becoming confused or bored. This system can help these kids in a lot of ways. I think this system will be effective and useful for students in classrooms. Facial Action Coding is a good thing for kids and should be in schools everywhere. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "1976 Nasa took a photo of a landfill that looked like a human face. Later on though they discovered that the face was just a martian mesa, and that the shadows helped the mesa look like a face. It is not evidence to life on mars because , Martian mesa's are common around Cydonia, And on April 5th 1998 the surveyer took another picture of the face on mars, and the image was much more clearer and they could see that it was just a landform nothing more.\n\nMartian mesa's are very common and can be found through out Mars. The only thing that helped it look like a face was, the shadows that the mesa made. The sun also cause the mesa to look like a face but when nasa took a closer and clearer photo of the mesa they found out it was just a simple rock formation that had very dark shadows making it to look like it had a nose, eyes, and mouth as the text states.\n\nYou see al it was just a landform there was no alien sculpture or anything like that, even though that would have been cool it just didn't happen. But thats okay because we learned new things about Mars and about space. But in the end we all learned something new. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I am for the development of Driverless Cars because it could use half the fuel of todays taxis and be way more felxiable than a bus, they are not totally driverless, and it could make driving a lot safer. Imangie what the Earth would look like if we were to cut down on the fuel we use for gas. If we were to switch over to \"driverless\" cars then it would use only half the fuel for a normal car. This could possible help us bring down our Co2 levels. Also these \"driverless\" cars aren't really driverless. The car can steer, accelerate, and brake by themselves but once there is a road block like a car accident or going through a work zone, it switches over to the human driver. Lastly, with all of the reckless and careless driving wouldn't you want you and your kids to be safe? Well with more advance sensors you can be safer. They can respond to the danger of out-of-control skids and rollovers. They can apply brakes to individual wheels and reduce power from the engine if needed. This has a lot more control than a human can manage.\n\nIn conclusion i think Driverless Cars are a good idea because it uses half the fuel than a normal car, the car is not totally driverless so we would have some control, and it could make driving a lot safe. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "As stated by Google cofounder Sergey Brin, a fleet of driverless cars may very well be the future of the public-transportation system. While the idea of driverless cars is very perplexing, the dangers behind trusting technology in driverless cars to properly drive may result in death if the technology malfunctions. Although the infatuation with the futuristic technology in driverless cars provoke many people to support the development of the cars, I personally believe the grey area of liabililty behind car accidents and better use of the funds given to driverless cars are what ultimately pursaudes me against the development of driverless cars.\n\nMulti media and films have been facinated with the neverending possibilities in driverless cars. With new improvements in technology, an era of driverless cars is now realistic. As stated in the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" in paragraph 6, \"Radar was a device on a hilltop that cost two uhundred million dollars,\" with development in technology, radar now is more accessable and less expensive in today's society and will not hinder the growth of driverless cars. Driverless cars also can help prevent simple mistakes on the road by being able to perform simple driving functions. In paragraph 7 in the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming,\" the Traffic Jam Assistant is able to \"handle driving functions at speeds up to 25 mph,\" although the Traffic Jam Assistant still requires human interaction at complex driving zones and accidents, the introduction of the assistant prevents human error on basic driving functions and will ultimately reduce accidents related to basic driving functions.\n\nWhile the driverless cars may help prevent accidents by eliminating the possibility of human error in driving. When the technology malfunctions, a grey area for liability appears that is still not quite clear to lawmakers. As stated in paragraph 9 in the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming,\" traffic laws are written with the assumption that the \"only safe car has a human driver in control at all times.\" The traffic laws described in the article show that if an accident occurs, the human driver will take liability since the car is deemed safe by the law. With the introduction of driverless cars, the grey area of liability that falls on the driver or the manufacturer will lead to a complicated situation that may not have a definite answer. Without the ability to prove where the liability falls in the cases of accidents, I personally believe that lawmakers will not create laws that allow driverless cars to prevent a complicated situation from occuring. Without the ability to be driven on streets, driverless car manufactuerers will die out and the technology of driverless cars will stagnate.\n\nWhile Car Companies such as Tesla and Audi plan to create and develop autopilot cars well into the middle 2000s as stated in paragraph 10 in the article \"Driverless cars Are Coming,\" the funds going into driverless cars for entertainment may be beneficial in other areas where the situation may be more dire. As stated in paragraph 8 in the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming,\" \"manufacterers hope to do that by bringing in-car entertainment.\" While driverless cars will help prevent accidents on the road and reduce mortality rates, the technological funds going into the development of the cars can be better used elsewhere, such as in funds to help cure diseases where the mortality rates are much higher.\n\nThe development of driverless cars brings an exciting future to the field of transportation and has limitless possibilities in the eyes of manufacturers; however, the practical reality that laws may not allow driverless cars due to the grey area of liability. Additionally, a plethora of better ways to use the funds given to driverless cars to help fund techology in other areas with higher mortality rates personally pursuades me against the future development of driverless cars. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author is using this article to suggest the idea of exploring and studying Venus. Venus is a very dangerous planet to study because a thick atmosphere cover the planet and it is the hottest planet in our solar system. However, the author still believe that studying Venus is going to beneficial despite the dangers. In the article, the author is suggesting that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit because we can use a vehicle that can hover over the ground and it's the most Earth-like planet in our solar system.\n\nOne reason why the author suggest the idea of studying Venus is because NASA has an idea for sending humans to go over Venus and observe it closely. Even tho Venus is the hottest planet, NASA can use their technology to make it survivable for humans. \"Just as our jet airplanes travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms, a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out of their way\"(Paragraph 5) That way, the scientists can study Venus up close without touching the ground. \"At thirty-plus miles above the surface, temperatures would still be toasty at around 170 degrees Fahrenheit, but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on Earth... Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans\"(Paragraph 5) The temperature would still be very hot but it will be survivable for humans.\n\nAnother reason why the author think it's worth the risk despite the dangers is because Venus is our sister planet. It is the planet we should study because Venus has alot of stuff in common with us. \"Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters.\"(Paragraph 4) Venus has alot of features that are familiar with Earth. It is critical that we study Venus because it might just be the planet we have the option of visiting. \"Furthermore, recall that Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit, a crucial consideration given the long time frames of space travel\"(Paragraph 4) We can also learn alot from Venus that can be beneficial to us.\n\nIn conclusion, the author used this article to suggest the idea of studying Venus, our sister planet. We have enough technology to study Venus closely while not touching their unfriendly ground. We also have alot in common with Venus so it's worth the risk of studying that planet, Earth can benefit from studying Venus and learning what to avoid. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Electoral college is unnecesary because the people of the United States do not always get to control what their state electors vote for. The state legislatures are the ones responsible for choosing the electors, not the people. Others may say that the electoral college works and that it should be here to stay. Many opinions are to be heard.\n\nA reason that people may want the electoral college is stay in place would be that the electors would do all the dirty work for them and they won't have to cast two votes the year that the new president will be chosen. The electors also get benefits for representing the states vote. They may also want to take advantage that the electoral college is still running.\n\nThe main reason that the electoral college is unnecesary is because the voters do not get to choose who the candidates are for the electoral college, therefore not knowing who the electors are and also not knowing who the electors want to vote for. The reason that some electors choose the wrong president are because the people don't really get a say in who the electors will vote for. They may protest and make signs to show their state electors who they people want as their president and the electors might listen to them, but overall the decision is the electors. The state legislators are the ones responsibe for choosing the electors, not the people of the state. So the elector may be a democrat and the majority of the people in that particular state are republicans. Would that be fair that that state was to vote for the opposite person running for presidency when the people obviously want the other candidate?\n\nMany people have a lot to say about this particular topic. some may say that the electoral college works. Some people may say that the electoral college is not worth the bother. Many opinions are out there about the electoral college. but i say that the electoral college is unfair,irrational, and outdated. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Since the rise of suburbs nationally and globally, car culture has been an important component of our history and of the typical human experience. Every teenager anticipates the excitement and freedom of a driver's license, our country is \"the birthplace of the Model T\" and \"the home of Detroit,\" and mothers across the globe rely on SUVs and station wagons to haul their children to and from school, soccer practice, Sunday mass, and the like (Source 4). In recent years, however, there is a growing trend of limited car usage around the world as countries promote vehicle-free neighborhoods and as in nations like the USA, \"there has been a large drop in the percentage of 16- to 39-year olds getting a license,\" (Source 4). This trend, while seemingly alarming in our technology-dependent universe, offers several advantages, from a better environment to healthier citizens and communities, and encouraging and promoting this pattern may just be as revolutionary for the planet as the introduction of the first car over a century ago.\n\nFrom France to Colombia, first of all, governments have been encouraging limited car usage as a means to better the environment through the reduction of toxic emissions into our atmosphere - after all, \"passenger cars are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe...and up to 50 percent in some car-intensive areas in the United States,\" (source 1). As debates have run rampant around the world about global warming and air pollution, several nations have taken initiative and experimented with the effects of this idea. In the district of Vauban, Germany, for instance, \"street parking, driveways and home garges are generally forbidden,\" and as a result of expensive parking spots for those who do choose to operate their vehicles - upwards of $40,000 a pop - \"70% of Vauban's families do not own cars,\" (Source 1). Limited car usage and public transportation is alternatively being promoted in Germany and elsewhere as an attempt to live our day-to-day lives in a way that is healthier for ourselves and the planet. France is one such example - in Paris, for instance, \"one of the most polluted cities in the world,\" \"near-record pollution\" led officials to impose a driving ban to help clear the air, and almost 4,000 were ticketed with a $31 fine as a result of not following orders (Source 2). Free public transit was offered, and a result of the actions of the ruling party, \"congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France, after five-days of intensifying smog,\" (Source 2). Likewise, Bogota, Colombia annually hosts a program known as the Day Without Cars that has attracted interest from neighboring countries and cities and provides an opportunity to \"take away stress and lower air pollution,\" according to businessman Carlos Arturo, who spent the day bicycling with his wife (source 3). Globally, limiting car usage has resulted in exciting changes for not only the environment, but, surprisingly, public health as well.\n\nThe obesity crisis and lack of healthy social interactions, secondly, both are looming global issues due the rise of supersized fast food and innovations in social media and the Internet, and this trend of limited car usage serves as an unseen, advantageous remedy by promoting healthier people and communities. Without cars, people must find alternative forms of transportation, and in Bogota, for example, during the Day Without Cars, \"millions of Colombians hiked, biked, skated...to work,\" and since this campaign began in the mid-1990s, it has seen \"the construction of 118 miles of bicycle paths\" and has resulted in parks, sports centers, and broad sidewalks; considerably less traffic; and the emergence of \"new restaurants and upscale shopping districts,\" (Source 3). A mother of two in Vauban, Germany, Heidrun, Walter, claims that, \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way,\" (Source 1). Alternative forms of transportation also allow for increased social interaction - walking with your neighbor on the way to work, your kids interacting while en route to school, or striking up a conversation with a stranger on a public bus or tram are all examples of making connections with others that do wonders for our mental and social health. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Could driverless cars be the future of the world? Some people strongly support the idea of the unmanned world of the future. Others believe we need to \"dumb it down\" a little bit and take things back to the old ways. Regardless of other peoples feelings I feel that there is a place for unmanned technology and there is a place for manned technology. Unmanned cars would be an amazing invention. If the invention was used for the right things. Being a car guy myself I know the insides and out sides of cars like I know my family. This being said I know that any mechanical thing on a car can and will break at some point or another. If a vital car part were to break during travel the car would not know what to do and could cause a wreck. Computers are also intrquite parts of cars and are prone to breaking down this could affect the navigation or the ability for the car to keep it self on the road. Accidents also happen no matter what. That is why they are called accidents. You dont mean for them to happen they just do. This means that for a passenger tranport type use, being used in the city and around town, a driverless car would be a great invention. However out on the open highway where speed can reach in excess of 80 miles per hour i do not believe that a driverless car is suitable. Like said in paragraph seven of the article cars still have to be controlled by humans in tight situations such as, traffic jams, road consrtuctuion areas, and accident sceans. This can be dangerous on a highway because say the human in the car is asleep and all of the sudden the car comes up on an accident. The human is asleep meaning they cannot take control of the car and even if they were to wake up they are still groggy and cannot focus as well. Combine that with the fact that all of the cars surrounding said vehical including that vehical are traveling in excess of 80 miles per hour you have just been given a recipie for disaster. So in conclusion, is a driverless car a bad invention? No, infact for certian applications a driveless car could make things so much simpler. That being said there are also certian situations where i believe driverless cars should just stay off the road.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In 2009 Google created \"driverless cars\". They weren't fully independant but they were the beginning of something great. Driverless cars will save the lives of people who would otherwise die in a car crash. Driverless cars will create jobs for people who need jobs. People are getting lazier and lazier, and they don't want to drive themselves anymore. Driverless cars are the future.\n\nCar crashes are caused when a driver isn't paying attention or they are intoxicated. This could mean the driver was texting, eating, changing the radio station, or even falling asleep at the wheel. With driverless cars people will be able to do whatever they want while the car is driving without worrying about crashing. They could text all they want or even sleep. The driver just needs to be prepared to take over the wheel if the driverless car runs into a roadblock and needs to go on a detour or needs to be parked. Driverless cars will take people who are out with freinds anywhere they want to go. Having friends in the car with you is one of the most distracting things to a driver, with all the talking and laughing. Things can go bad really fast. These cars will also help keep intoxicated drivers off the road. Some driverless cars can independantly complete ninety percent of the tasks required. This will get an intoxicated person very close to their home if not all the way there.\n\nDriverless cars will create jobs. Jobs in programing, design, manufacturing, and upkeep of the cars. Some might say that driverless cars will take more jobs than it gives. These people say that taxi drivers and bus drivers will lose their jobs. Yes, that is most likely true but they will create so many more jobs. The amount of jobs created will be more than the ones lost. As Spock once said \"The needs of the many outway the needs of the few, or the one.\"\n\nPeople are getting lazier and lazier, they don't want to drive themselves anywhere anymore. This is one of the reasons that we need driverless cars. As society evolves we see that people are getting lazier. Lazy people don't want to drive anywhere. This is where driverless cars come in. Driverless cars will take lazy people who don't pay attention to their destination safely and without accident. People might say that driverless cars end up making people lazier by allowing them to do little to nothing and still get where they want to go. Yes, people might get lazier but it is better than people dying form crashing their car.\n\nDriverless cars will save lives of people who would otherwise die in a car crash. Driverless cars will create jobs for people who need jobs. Driverless cars will also help people who are very lazy. These reasons and many others is why we need driverless cars. Driverless cars are the future.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I am against driverless cars because if you dont want to have the responsibility to drive a car you shouldnt have one. Im also against it because the car could do something you dont want it to. the main point is you shouldnt have a car if you dont want to control it in that case you might as well ride a bus or airplane.\n\nAlso it would cost alot of money you would have to buy certain types of streets anfd that would mess up other cars. You would have to upgrade the roads frequently. But most importantly I wouldnt want smart cars because they maybe would cause alot of accidents they could run red lights stop signs. Driverless cars are also not good because you could be on your cellphone and accidently take control and you dont know. It is also bad because that means the people in cars won't wear seatbelts and if they get in a car crash the are going to get hurt. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "You should participate in the Seagoing Cowboys program, because the Seagoing Cowboys program you take lots of trips, and you will be able to visit new countries and states. In the program you will take lots of cattle-boat trips. When you take trip you will be fed and watered. Seagoing Cowboys had to take care of animals in World War ll. That is a good thing to help animals when people are in war, so they don't die. You have to serve night watchman. When look was on the ship he almost went overboard, but a small strip of metal kept him from going overboard. That is the only thing i want like about being a Seagoing Cowboy. He was happy to be alive. but being on a ship when it's stormy, you can get cracked ribs or injured, because the ship was out of controll and it was very stormy. When you have return trips, you can have lots of fun when you are a Seagoing Cowboy. When you are done being a Seagoing Cowboy, it will make you aware of people needs in other countries. Awareness will stay with you, after you learn about people needs in other countries. That is why the Seagoing Cowboys program is a great program for everyone in this world.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In my opinion I believe that the use of this technology is great because in the text it was stated that \"a classroom computer could recongnize when a student is becoming confused or bored\" and since mosts students dont like to speak up maybe the teacher can ask them after class if they understood the subject or the lesson that day.\n\nBut everything has an opposing side. This could also not be a benefit because maybe if someone has a private feeling saying maybe like a crush and the computer states something like \"in love\" maybe thats something they wanted to keep for themselves. well mainly that would depend on the teacher you have or if she/he will tell anyone but id doubt it.\n\nSome feelings are also really difficult to understand like maybe the computer can bring the wrong emotion or mis calculate how you are feeling. \" the facial expressions for each emotion are universal,\" according to Dr. huang.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Facial Action Coding System is a new piece of technology that can help students and companies worldwide. Using this technology can benefit many. This technology is vaulabe to everyone and is a step towrd the future.\n\nThe author describes a new technology called Facial Action Coding System (FACS), as a way to identify human emotions. The way FACS works is a computer constructs a 3-D computer model of a face. It can move all 44 major muscles of the face like human muscles in correspondence with emotion. FACS has six basic emotions such as, happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, and sadness.\n\nEach emotion is chracterized with the facial\n\nmuscles according to paragraph 3. According to Dr.Huang in paragraph 4, facial expressions are universal, even though some indidviduals show varying degrees of expression. Scientists use algorithms to calculate emotion in people. These different algorithms can be useful to all.\n\nStudents should use this technology to read emotional expressions. This technology can benefit fine arts students greatly. Theatre kids can use this technology to define their character more and use the correct expressions and emotions. Art students can analyze art with this technology and create more similar to it. Some students who prefer science can also use this. AMny facial expressions move muscles in our face and anatomy students can use this to figure out how the face creates expressions. This technology is valuable to students and should be available to them.\n\nIn conclusion, FACS technology is very beneficial. It can be useful to students and is very valuable. Adults want kids to succeed and technology is the way to help us. Technology is easily available to us and can help us later in life with the right skills and development. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\", the author presents negative aspects of driverless cars saying smart cars are not totally driverless yet and they still need human skills. Also if there was a accident in a smart car then it could be the driver or the manufacturer fault, and lastly that a smart car needs a lot of help. I think smart cars are a negative aspect and should not be dealt with.\n\nSmart cars are even driverless cars yet they still need human help like going through traffic jams and construction work. In the article it said, \"In fact, none of the cars are completely driverless.\" Manufacturers haven't made a car that can drive by itself yet and maybe they never can. However the cars alert the driver when to drive and when to help but smart cars shouldn't have to do that.\n\nA accident could happen while you're in your smart car and it could be your fault or the manufactuer's fault. The driver would think this isn't my fault because I wasn't driving in the first place but it could be anyone fault. According to the article it said,\"Manufacturers are also considering using cameras to watch the drivers are remaining focused on the road.\" That tells you that there is evident if the driver is at fault. However the car could have technical difficulty and it could be the manufactuers fault but thats why they are trying not to have that happen.\n\nSmart cars need a lot of help, and that is with sensors and human skills. In the article it said, \"Special touch sensors make sure the driver keeps hold of the wheel.\" That mean the drivers has to hold the wheel if not than the sensors will sense that. However sensors in the cars are a good idea because the car wouldn't know what to do but if they have sensors and still need human help then what's the point of both.\n\nSmart cars are negative aspects because how tired do you have to be to not be able to drive your own self. Smart cars do not know how to drive on their own, there could be a accident and wouldn't know whos fault and smart cars need alot of help. Smart cars would just be better if they were regular old cars and nothing greater", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Mr. Florida State Senator,\n\nMy name is PROPER_NAME from SCHOOL_NAME in LOCATION_NAME, and I am writing to you addressing a matter that I have witnessed being discussed, come every four years presidential election time: the Electoral College. I am in favor of abolishing the Electoral College and changing to election by popular vote for the president of the United States. The method of electing our president should be changed to election by popular vote because the Electoral College is unfair, problematic, and does not represent the will of our citizens accurately.\n\nFirst of all, the Electoral College is unfair. Because many states are \"set\" Republican or Democrat, it seems like only the votes in \"swing states\" seem to matter. According to\n\nThe Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong ,\"During the 2000 campaign, seveteen states didn't see the candidates at all...and voters in 25 of the largest media markets didn't get to see a single campaign ad.\"So, it seems that, in this system of election, only the swing states matter in voting. Though the focused campaigning is necessary in the process of the Electoral College, it would not be necessary if the voting system was by popular vote. This is unfair because it puts potential voters in the dark about what's going on. Also, Democrats in \"Republican\" states or vice versa cannot hope for them to help their preferred presidential candidate, as mentioned in\n\nIn Defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the President .\n\nSecondly, the Electoral College is problematic. There is much uncertainty with the Electoral College. As\n\nWhat Is the Electoral College states, we vote for electors to vote for the President and Vice President. According to\n\nThe Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong , \"[The electors]can be anyone not holding public office...sometimes the presidential candidates themselves.\" The electors may not vote for who the people wanted. An example of this would be in the presidential election of 1960. Also according to\n\nThe Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong , \"...segregationists in the Louisiana legislature nearly succeeded in replacing the Democratic electors with new electors.\"(paragraph 11) If they had succeded, it would have meant a longer period of intense segregation and racism, which we are still fighting to this day. Another reason that the Electoral College is problematic is in a case of a tie in the electoral vote. Then, more steps are required to figure out who's president.\n\nLastly, the Electoral College does not represent the citizens of the United States accurately. Many reasons support this claim. I think political parties are similar to \"cliques\" in school. People in cliques act in a certain way, dress in a certain way, only think that how they do things is right, etc. Political parties are similar. If you pick a political party to identify as, you're either \"pro-life\" or \"pro-choice\". You're either for something or against something. There's not really an in-between. In\n\nIn Defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the President , author Richard A. Posner says that \"Voters in presidential elections are people who want to express a political preference rather than people who think that a single vote may decide an election...\"(paragraph 23). Presidential candidates that don't identify with a certain party don't have much of a chance to win at all, even if they might turn out to be what's best for our country. I don't think there should be a vote for \"political preference\", but that's another arguement. Voters should vote for who they want to represent their country with flexible decisions, not a set cookie-cutter description, like a clique in school.\n\nIn conclusion, I believe we should abolish the Electoral College and put in place a new system of voting. The process of voting should be changed to the poplular vote because the Electoral College is unfair, uncertainly problematic, and an inaccurate form of representation. We all want what's best for the country, right? So, this is how I think we should make our country better. My voice may not be much, but it only takes one to start a movement. Please consider my voice, and it could be a step to making our country the best it can be.\n\nSincerely,\n\nPROPER_NAME ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "hey guys this is tyler, i'm a reporter, today i'm going to give you three reasons why it's a challenge to explore venus.\n\n- my first reason is because venus is a very very hot plant if you so much as enter the plant, the atmosphere it will crush you do to the tempature and the extreme conditions on the plant.\n\n- my second reason it has been claimed that it is more dangerous to see up close.\n\nit's the second planet away from the sun but it is also considered our planet, earth's, \"twin\" among other things the reason why it's considered our second planet is for density and size also distance.\n\n- my final reason it's thick atmosphere of almost 97% carbon dioxide blankets venus for a even more challenge the clouds have a high corrosive sulfuric acid in the atmosphere. the pressure is 90 times greater than what we exprience on our own planet. the conditions are far more extreme than anything humans can encounter on earth.\n\ni'm going to end this report, thanks for reading and i hope you enjoyed it.\n\nthank you:)", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The thought of a computer program being able to read emotions sounds very interesting at first. It almost makes a person feel like he or she are in a science fiction book set in the future. Though it may be interesting, that does not necessarily make it right. The truth of the matter is that though a computer program measuring how someone feels may be interesting, it is an invasion of privacy and teachers have no need to know a student's emotions while in class. The new technology, Facial Action Coding System, is not valuable to be used in a classroom because it is an invasion of a student's privacy and is not necessary.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding System is not valuable to be used in a classroom because of how invasive it is to a student's privacy. The text explained that the technology was able to determine that in the Mona Lisa painting the person being painted was 83 percent happy, 9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent happy. No one should be able to know to that great of a detail what another person is feeling without that person's premission. If a teacher wanted to know the emotions of his or her students, simply asking them how they feel is enough. Using that technology in a classroom crosses a boundry of privacy that many students would not be comfortable with. Many students would not feel at ease and safe being in the classroom knowing their emotions are being read.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding System is not valuable to be used in a classroom because it is not necessary. In the text Dr. Huang, who works with the Facial Action Coding System technology, says that most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication. Students and people in general are already communicating their emotions to the level that their emotions need to be communicated. When someone sees another person smiling, he or she knows that person is happy, or if someone sees a person frowning, he or she knows that person is sad. The text says the technology could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored to support that the technology could be beneficial in a classroom setting. But the truth of the matter is, if a teacher wants to know when his or her class is becoming confused or bored, all he or she would have to do is ask. That is why most teachers ask after a lesson, \"Does anyone have any questions?\"\n\nNot only that, but a teacher would not have to know if a student is happy or sad in the first place. The responsibility of a teacher is to teach and to ensure the students understand. A teacher does not need to know if his or her students are happy or sad. A school would be wasting its money to pay for a system that is not of necessity.\n\nIt is evident with all of the facts stacked against it, that Facial Action Coding System is not valuable in a classroom setting because of its invasiveness to student privacy and the lack of a need for it in a classroom. From the fact that knowing exactly everything students are feeling would make students uncomfortable, to the fact that a teacher could ask a student if he or she wanted to know how that student is feeling, it is clear this technology lacks value in a classroom setting. School administration and the community should ensure that this kind of technology never gets put in any classrooms. This would be a waste of money for the school corporation because of the lack of necessity for it. It would also make many students uncomfortable, which could in turn make it harder to learn.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "You can help out like Luke Bomberger did is you join the war. You are putting your life in steak and you could possibly get hurt but you are helping out our people of the United States. Luke Bombergerthought that it was a little big for him only for a small town boy.\n\nWhen Luke was a young man he worked two part time jobs and his friend offered him one of the part time jobs. Luke then helped out in the army for world war 2 and he was happy that he joined because he helped out people of his own kind. Now what i mean is that if you want to help out in fighting for our country go right ahead and help out like Luke. Luke had a lot of jobs and he had a great time in the jobs and he did them well and he loved his jobs. Luke did have a good life and he help a lot of people out so do the same with your life. You can help a lot of people when you can see that some one needs help it does not matter what you are doing just stop what it is and go help. You can make a good life doing that the people will appricate what you can do for them.\n\nYou can make a big change If you join the army you can still give us Justice.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What would it be like for someone to walk up to a car, get in, and have it take them to their distination without them having to do anything? That would be amazing right? Well thanks to our friends at Google it may be soon possible. I think autonomous cars are a fantasitc idea.\n\nGoogle is designing an amazing new technology that allows the \"driver\" to get in the vehicle and just sit back and relax. I feel that it is just awesome that we can eliminate the human error aspect of driving. Now obviously this technology is a little ways off but the concept alone is something to raise attention to. As more and more companies begin to show interest in the new driverless cars the sooner this technology will come to fruition.\n\nThings like front and rear facing cameras, radar sensors, and GPS will be included in these vehicles to make them as safe as possible. The \"driver\" has the abiltiy to take full control of the car at anytime so it is not as though they are trapped or hopeless. The vehicles are also implementing technology that worns the driver when they are to take control of the vehicle. These warnings would ve in the form of graphics and symbols that would show up on the dashboard in case something was getting ready to leave the ability of the vehicle.\n\nThe technology has resulted in some issues due to the nature that it hasn't yet been fully developed. Most states have laws restricting the use of these vehicles in fear of this, but the technology would not be released to the general public without thurough testing. Companies are having to go to select states to even be alloud to test these amazing cars on the road. Strict laws may very well be the biggest obsticle for the autonomous car to surpass before it becomes a common occurence\n\nSome people are worried that the technology can be dangerous and that humans should always be in control, but with further advancements in the future this should be a worry of the past. It is true that the best autonomous car has only been able to survive in normal trafic simulations at twenty five miles an hour. That is under the speed limit almost everywere except parking lots. But imagine if someone is say intoxicated and gets in a driverless car or drives home drunk. Which would be more safe then? I feel that question is very easy to answer.\n\nI feel that driverless cars are the way of the future and when the time comes and the technology is ready I beleave that it will be huge for society as a hole. From eliminating human error to allowing you to open up time for other things during your work commute autonomous vehicles are the next big evolution the car industy has planned in the foreseable future.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Electoral Collge is a process where electors vote for President and Vice President, and count the number of electoral votes by Congress. Many people are debating whether or not keep the Electoral College or change it to a election by popular vote for the president of the United States. Although the Electoral College has been taking place for many years now, it can be a disaster factor. I believe that the Electoral College should be abolished and changed to a election by popular vote for the president of the United States because it will make the election fair, the chance of there being a tie is much less, and it will be rather rational as oposed to the Electoral College.\n\nThe Electoral College is not fair and it is irrational. Voters don't vote directly to the president they want. According to Source 1: \"What is the Electoral College?\" voters actually voting for their candidate's electors. Majority of the states have a \"winner- take- all\" system in which electors are awarded to the winning candidate. Voters don't get to chose who exactly they want, it's based upon which elector they chose that really determines who will win the presidential election. The voters can't always control what the elector they chose does with what thy're decision was on who they wanted to win the election, and they just as well get confused and sometimes possibly make the wrong choice. Changing it to election by popular vote for the president of the United States is fair for anyone who votes. There is less chance of getting confused and less chance of picking the wrong elector. Even though others may argue that each party selects trusted electors to vote for the patry's nominees, it's still not fair to those who get confused and end up picking the wrong elector which leads to wrong vote towards the presidential election.\n\nThe chances of it turning out to be a tie aren't low. Accoring to Source 2: \"The Indefensible Electoral Colleg: Why even the best laid defenses of the system are wrong\", a tie has happened before. States have sent two states of electors to Congress. Although it happened long ago, it doesn't mean that it won't occur anytime again. Abolishing the Electoral College can give a less chance for that to occur. Since staes have the \"winner- take- all\" system, the candidates don't even spend time or focus on the states that thye know they have no chance in winning in. According to source 2, there were seventeen states who didn't even get to see the election at all, and some votes didn't even get to see the ad of the campaign.\n\nThe presidential election will become rational to many people. There may be cons to abolishing the Electoral College but there are more pros to it rather than cons. It would make the presidential election fair and easier for the voters voting for the candidates. People may argue that it's best to keep the Electoral College because some states may not have enough people voting for the candidates so it wouldn't be possible to directly vote for the president of the United States but there are more states who do have the chance to chose and make a direct decision rather than picking an elector who may or may not go agaisnt the party that had picked them and then they can end up chosing who they, the electors want instead of what the voter really wanted and intended. Many people may be able to agree that it is best to abolish the Electoral College instead of keeping it. The electors are picked mostly based upon the state.\n\nAbolishing the Electoral College is the fair, rational, and beneficial thing to do. Keeping the Electoral College won't benefit the presidential election in any way possible. It's better to keep the election fair than otherwise. Voters should be able to know exaclty who they're picking without any confusion or without accidently picking the wrong person. People shouldn't need to be confused about who they're picking and they shouldn't have to posibly worry at the fact that the elector they voted for might defy the will of the voters and they would pick who they, the voters feel like picking rather than picking who the voters vote was actually intended for in the first place. There are risks to basically putting the voters vote in someone elses hands and the voters vote can easily be changed by one of the electors that the party had picked because they trusted that person. If the presidential election was about who you can pick directly, then it would be much easier and the voters will know that the presidential election was fair and nothing was done to change who they voted for in the beginning. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars seem to be more effecient then the cars we use today. These cars are more safer for the environment because if someone isn't paying attention to the road at certain moments the car as sensors to know when to stop on its own. The only time the driver would have to take the wheel is when there is curves, turns or accidents that you have to avoid on the road.\n\nWhile the driver is in the driver seat he/she would always be alert because when it is time for them to take the wheel the in-car entertainment and information systems, which use heads-p displays. There would be less accidents happening because of the car and the many sensors it holds. Information from the sensors can cause the car to apply brakes on individual wheels and it will reduce the power of the engine, and gives a better response and control than a human driver could manage alone.\n\nThe law states that safety is best achieved is with alert drivers, these cars have many ways of alerting a driver and it make it known that it is their turn to take over. If the technology fails it could rely on the driver or the manufacturer depending on what it was that failed. When the traffic laws get changed you would majoritly lose more laws than gain some. Driverless cars allow you to use half of the amount of fuel that a normal car does. With that being said our government system wouldn't have to spend so much money and resources that we already do to produce the amount of fuel we do today.\n\nThese cars could be more reliable for the people who are physically disabled in someways to drive. If you are deaf your car could send you sensors of blinking lights signifying you need to take the wheel. It could even possibly help the dwarfs with the way they have to drive cars. When having these kind of cars a driver only really needs to be able to see and have arms. The article states that we grow closer to our destination every day, meaning there are still new ways to work them and the producers are making it more safer for drivers and to fit into the laws for safety.\n\nDriverless cars is what this world needs when it comes to transportation with drivers. When driving you won't have to worry everytime that what if someone will wreck into me or I hope my car doesn't give out on me in the middle of nowhere. Our percent rates of driving and getting into accidents may go down because us drivers aren't truly driving it anymore. This could give us another way of less pollutants from fuel making and cars. Our economy could become more effecient with cars. People today already use autopilot in their cars while driving. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I chose to be against it. If these cars were being sold i really feel like a new drivimg test would have to be given considering the car has to alert you when it needs someone to take control. If you are driving a car what would you be doing inside your car that you would need it to drive by itself. I'm not sure that everyone would even be able to afford these types of cars. As newer cars get built more things get added to them, in 2013, BMW introduced the delvelopment of an asistant that can steer themselves, accelerate, and brake themselves. When danger comes they notify the driver by a vibration in the seat. If i was in one of these cars I would not trust it with my life. If something bad went wrong then my life would be endagered and possibly someone elses life could be and who would be blamed for that? They also say that the driver would watch the road while the car watches the driver, there is already people who text and drive but i think that rate would go up even more because if the car is driving itself why would they pay attention. I don't think that these types of cars would be safe or effective.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The innovation of using the new technology known as Facial Action Coding System (FACS) would be an invalubale asset in any classroom across the globe as it's complex algorithms can make learning more beneficial by reading individuals for what they require than it go unnoticed.\n\nWith FACS installed in each classroom, students would become more focused and better at managing class time rather than wasting it by other means. The excerpt quotes Dr. Huang,\"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming bored or confused... Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\"(P2, L7-8). This statement details how FACS can keep students invested in the lesson with optimal intake of course material as the level of emotional feedback allows it to continuously make improvements on itself to assist students with comprehension and prevent negative emotions.\n\nStudents would also gain access to more interactive material such as educational media that would allow them to further their own understanding of topics held in the classroom. The text states,\"The same technology can make computer-animated faces more expressive--for video games or video surgery.\"(P6 L 8-10). This opens up a variety of possible academic applications with students being able to perform interactive virtual surgeries or increase their social adequency by speaking in front of large, virtual crowds more effectively as facial expression can give them incite on their performance and the list goes on. This facial reading technology can boost gaming and simulated platforms that make the students more eager and\n\nwilling to learn and try new educational things by taking and giving facial input.\n\nAlong with all of the individualized educational benefits in the classroom, this technology can also improve the moods of student that could make the schooling environment more easy going. The text says, \"According to the Facial Feedback Theory of Emotion, moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions, but may even help produce them.\"(P9 L2-4).This details that students who would smile more in class knowing it is being monitored, may truly smile by the end of it because the collective group of students would gradually raise the atmosphere of the classroom into a friendly environment with high spirits. This would not only make the learning process run smoothly, but also decrease stress in students and increase productivity.\n\nAn argument could be made that the constant monitorization can make students anxious or feel as though their right to privacy is being breached, but in reality, classrooms are already like this. Students who use school loaned computers only have access to education material and any teacher may pull up what is on the students screen regardless of permission. But by choosing FACS, it would make the student feel more comfortable as they know that the computer is monitoring their expressions in order to make life simpler and is always best suited for them. Over time, they will be accustomed to it and maybe even regard it as best part of the learning experiance growing up in a rapidly evolving, technology-based world.\n\nIn conclusion, by integrating this facial expression reading software into school systems, students will gain many new oppertunites to get the most out of their education. Not only would they be able to keep pace with the objectives of each class with ease and a smile, but they would be able to leave each day having learning or done a task with immediate input by computer generated expressions that are reassuring of how well the student did. For the best possible education, this system creates and maintains the academic environment needed to have all students be prosperous and effective individuals when it is time for them to become apart of the real world.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "During World War II, 1945, I was traveling the seven seas. I saw many beautiful things outside my window. I think it's a great oppurtunity to get time to spend with yourself and new friends. There are many reasons why you should join the Seagoing Cowboys program. You should join the Seagoing Cowboys program because you get to travel many places and see beautiful things, you get a lot of free time, and you get to play games like table-tennis tournaments, fencing, boxing, reading, whittling, and games that help pass time.\n\nThe first reason why you should the Seagoing Cowboys program is because you get to travel many places and see beautiful things, like nature. I got to fly to China, Greece, and all over Europe. According to the text, it states: Besides helping people, I had the side benefit of seeing Europe and China. But seeing the Acropolis in Greece was special,\" and it also states: It took two weeks to cross the Atlantic Ocean from the eastern coast of the United States and a month to get to China.\" This explains that you will get to see many things and travel many places, but be patient becasue it takes a while.\n\nAnother good reason about joining the Seagoing Cowboys program is because you get to spend a lot of time by yourself and new friends. I had time to read, and play multiple games there. According to the passage, \"It took two weeks to cross the Atlantic Ocean from the eastern coast of the United States and a month to get to China.\" and it also states: \"I also found time to have fun on board, especially on return trips after the animals had been reloaded,\" This explains why you could have a lot of freetime on board.\n\nThe last reason why you should join the Seagoing Cowboys program, is because you get to be with animal on board. Now, I know if you're a cowboy, you love animals, so this is a good time to learn about an animal's behavior and learn more about the animal. According to the excerpt, it states: \"UNRRA (the United Nations Relief and Rehabilition Administration) hired \"Seagoing Cowboys\" to take care of the horses, young cows, and mules that were shipped overseas,\" This explains how you get a lot of free time with animals.\n\nWith these reasons, the Seagoing Cowboy program is a great place. You should join because of these three reasons, I have explained why you should join the Seagoing Cowboys program. The reasons why you should join are because you get to travel and see beautiful things like nature, you get a lot of free time with yourself and new friends, and you get to be with animals. (You're going to love this if you are an animal lover,)", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The aurthor dose well in explaining details about venus. Scientists keep learning about venus even though its dangerous? Why, we beleive to think that the reason why scientist continue working on sending man to venus is mostly because the planet is closest to earth and they think it can be a twin of earth with mountains valleys and at one point in time it has had some form of life.\n\nOn paragraph 4 \"astronomers are fascinated by venus because it may well once have been the most earth-like planet in our solar system.\" It states that long ago it could of had been \"covered largely with oceans.\" But if scientists say that the planet is so \"inhospitable\"\n\nwhy are scientists planing to visit much furher into the venus planet?\n\nVenus has much to offer when it comes to learning about it, reffering to the amount of sulfuric acid in the clouds (how'd they get like that?) If scientist say that earth can be simmilar to venus, will earth get like that, \"corrosive couds?\" I'd like to think not because no matter venus is closer to the sun and eath is just far ways from it.\n\nIf a submarine attempts to go down into the depths of the water there in venus . There can be major damage done to the submarine which is accustomed to go under water but it's the metal that'll melt from the sulfuric acid and the hot tempatures of the planets surface. Venus is known for the hottest planet's\n\ntempature throughout the solar system.\n\nVenus is worthy of pursuit despite the dangers because scientists are wanting to find out if the planet used to be like earth before. If it had been covered largely with oceans? Or simlpy as much as having any sorce of life it may of have had or hadn't had. Wouldn't you like to find out if venus was once like earth before?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars would have never crossed our mind 50 years ago, but today, they are already being developed and tested. Driverless cars are wrong beacuse they could cause a lot more accidents from technology malfunctions, they could potentially cause many law suits and problems in our world, and they will make humans even more technology dependent and incapable of taking care of themselves if somehow we lost all electricity and had to operate cars by ourselves.\n\nDriverless cars are owned and operated by the company who makes them, humans have little to no control on what happens in the car. So if the car crashes, would it be the manufacturers fault or the humans fault? Driverless cars could potentially cause many unneccesary arguments and law suits between manufacturers and consumers. If someone is riding in the driverless car, and the car crashes, the manufacturers should be the ones to blame unless they develop a technology to enable the humans to take complete control if neccesary. Many arguments could be made that the manufacturer didn't program the car correctly anf that is why the person was injured or even so much as killed. This could result in manufacturers of big companies paying millions maybe even billions of dollars in law suits.\n\nDriverless cars could cause a lot more accidents because there isn't someone physically watching the surroundings of the car, and technology as simple as calculators can malfunction sometimes, so would you really trust a car run by a computer with your life? Driverless cars have no human physically driving unless it enables the human to drive, and even then it will be hard to avoid the accident because the car wouldn't inform the human about the incident unles just milliseconds before it happens because they can't predict the future and neither can we. The amount of accidents would most likely skyrocket if driverless cars became an everyday thing because of the lack of control and responsibilty a human has in the car.\n\nToday we have many different things that involve technology. We have phones that we depend on for almost everything we do in life, we have computers which we use to store information, we have calculators so we don't even have to remember how to do simple math on our own. Almost everything we do in life has some sort of technology to make our lives easier. Now we might not even have to drive our own car. Driverless cars could mean that people never have to learn how to drive, and then what would happen if for some reason the world lost all electricity, wifi, and communication signals? That means no more phones computers, calculators, and no driverless cars. People are so dependent on technology today that giving them another thing to be dependent on to not have to drive themselves is going to cause a lot of problems if the world has an extreme crisis. Hardly anyone would know how to drive, which means very little transportation and it will be ahrder to communicate with people.\n\nDriverless cars should be illegal because it could potentially cause ven more uneeded law suits and arguments, it could cause a lot more deaths in car accidents, and it would make people very uneducated on how to get places if the technology somehow stopped working. The world is just fine driving themselves, and on top of everything else we depend on technology for, it would be nice to keep at least one thing we have to do for ourselves just for the sake of human independency. If we create driverless cars, we will truly not have anything left to do for ourselves and there will be extreme crisises if something were to happen to our electricity. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"New software has been developed that improves accuracy in percieving the emotions of others.\" I believe that this software is very interesting because it detects your facial expressions through a screen and tries to understand your emotions. However, I do not think that we need this software in our schools for education purposes.\n\nThere are a few reasons in which I believe that these programs should not be installed on our school computers. The text claims that \"the computer could modify a lesson, like a human instructor.\"\n\nHowever, I find this hard to believe considering the software can not specifically determine what lessons or problems you do not understand. One for instance, if a student is supposedly confused or bored, he or she can ask the teacher for help. If we have a school computer that modifies and changes the lesson due to facial expressions, it might get in the way and misunderstand what we actually need help with or slow us down. Recieving specific help from teachers, to understand the certain steps that a student struggles with would be a better option in my opinion.\n\nSecondly, we do not know how accurate this software is. The program could be very touchy; It could mix up confusion for anger. The student could be upset about a different topic or could simply have a certain resting face. The accuracy could have a lot to do with how this program would help us.\n\nLastly, Why spend a lot of money installing programs to hundreds of computers at our school when we can recieve help from our teachers?\n\nTeachers are there to answer specific questions and a software that only detects your facial expressions and matches them to emotions can not do that. Installing these programs to our school computers will cost the school a lot of time and money without knowing for a fact that this software will actually be useful. Given these ideas, I do not think that it would be a very helpful addition to our students to install this software. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile,\" the author describes how a new technology called the \"Facial Action Coding System\" which enables computers to identify human emotions. In paragragh 1 it talks about why the Mona Lisa 83 percent happy, 9 percent disgusted, and 6 percent fearful in Leonardo da Vinci's Renaissance painting, the Mona Lisa. In paragraph 1 it also talks about a new technology called the \"Facial Action Coding System\" that can read humans facial emotions made by Professor Thomas Huang. These are the things that the article talks about thoughout the passage.\n\nThe first thing I will talk about is the way students in a classroom can also read the emotions of other students. In the paragragh before paragragh 8 it says that, \"They even indicate the difference between a genuine smile and a forced one.\" I chose this sentence because it explains how students are able to read other students facial expressions. Another thing is in science class the students performed a lab expierment to see if they can read other students facial expressions. They were able to do this because in paragraph 8 it says that the muscles in your face are called orbicularis oculi.\n\nThe second thing is how Professor Thomas Huang managed to be able to create a new technology to read humans facial expresions. In paragragh three it says that,\" when a computer constructs a model of the face; all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles.\" I chose this sentence because it explains how this new technology works.\n\nThe last thing that the article talks is how it can read the Mona Lisa's facial expressions. In paragraph one it says that,\" She's 83 percent happy, 9 percent digusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry.\" I chose this sentence because it explains how this demonstration showed that this new technology can read humans facial expressions.\n\nFinally in this article,\"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" the author describes how a new technology called the \"Facial Action Coding System\" which enables computers to be able to identify human emotions. The first thing that I talk about is that students in a science classroom performing a lab experiment were to read their partners facial expressions. The second thing that I talk about is how Professor Thomas Huang, of the Beckam Institute for Advanced science was able create this new technology, none this be possible without his new technology the \"Facial Action Coding System.\" Lastly none this would also be possible without the Mona Lisa's demonstration to read her facial expressions.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the author describes why putting a man on the moon seems like a walk in the park compared to the horrendous obstacles preventing humans from pushing the frontier with visiting one of Earth's neighbors, Venus. The thick atmosphere is toxic to us. The clouds of sulfuric acid, the incredibly high temperatures on the planet's surface, and pressure would present challenges to mankind and its technology.\n\nYet, the author sees that mankind cannot be afraid of the risks when the rewards are so great. In \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents is supported through Venus' vast similarities to Earth, Venus' proximity to Earth, and the innovation in machines by researchers that could make them work long enough to expand mankind's knowledge on Venus.\n\nThe idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers is supported through Venus' vast similarites to Earth, which is why humans have such interest in this particular planet. The author explains points in Venus' history that have intrigued astronomers, \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largelyt with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, \" (4). Besides having been closer to Earth's \"twin\" many years ago, Venus may be more similar than humans thought, shown through \"The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and includes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters,\" (4). Studying Venus could lead to us knowing why this planet is such a far cry from Earth now, and this could provide valuable with how humans interact with their environment. If Venus has such similar features to Earth, like valleys, then there is probably more to discover on Venus' surface. This peculiar connection between this planet and Venus shows how valuable exploration could prove, just as Venus' proximity further supports how worthy of a pursuit Venus is.\n\nThe idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the presented dangers is supported through Venus' proximity. The author conveys the usefulness of having Venus so close, \"Because Venus is sometimes right around the corner-in space terms-humans have sent numerous spacecraft to land on this cloud-draped world,\" (2). Time and distance can be very influential in making groundbreaking decisions, like pursuing the exploration of Venus, as can be seen through, \"...Venus can be sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit, a crucial consideration given the long time frames of space travel,\" (4). Humans love to have everything near by, like schools, work, and more, because of the convenience; the same benefit is seen with Venus. When the planet is close, the fuel needed would not be the same if humans were trying to get to Jupiter. There would be less of a chance of losing them. Time is essential in space, given humans' limited control out there, so proximity makes it that much easier for us to make the bold move. Venus's proximity gives reason to continue working towards exploring Venus, just as the innovations in machines have.\n\nThe idea that Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it brings is supported through the innovation in machines that could make the close-up exploration of Venus possible. NASA's advancements for Venus exploration are promising, \"For example, some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks in such chaos,\" (7). Humans would not be able to use the most advanced technology, but durability is the goal, \"By comparison, systems (mechanical computers that use gears and levers to calculate) that use mechanical parts can be made more resistant to pressure, heat, and other forces,\" (7). If humans were to only hover over Venus, the possibilites are limited. Humans and technology have to be as close as possible. Technology that could last for a few weeks is enough to vastly expand our knowledge. Mechanical computers are now obsolete, but in Venus would be a valuable tool, just like the other electonics being made. Researchers have worked tirelessly to continue making Venus exploration a reasonable reality.\n\nIn \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents is supported through Venus' vast similarities to Earth, Venus' proximity to Earth, and the innovation in machines by researchers that could make them work long enough to expand mankind's knowledge on Venus. The idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers is supported through Venus' vast similarites to Earth, which is why humans have such interest in this particular planet. The idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the presented dangers is conveyed through Venus' proximity. The idea that Venus is a worthy pursuit despite its hostile environment is supported through the innovation in machines that could make the close-up exploration of Venus possible. The author believes that sometimes humans cannot let curiosity, imagination, and innovation be trampled by the dangers and doubts. Humans cannot live in fear all the time. The human spirit always demands that humans continue striving towards knowing more. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Do you think it would be valuble to use the Facial Action Coding System is a technolgy that read your emotions and read it off with a percentige here is an example as it says in th first pargraph she is 83 percent happy.9 percent disguested,6 percent fearfull,and 2 percent angry. The process of the FACS is th computer constructs a 3-D model of the face all 44 major muscles in the model must move like hummans muscle's.\n\nDr. Huang relies on his work for pschologist such as Dr. Paul Eckman creator of FACS Eckman has classiflied 6 basic emotions such as happpnies,surpise,anger,disgust,fear, and sadness. Anf then associted with characteristic's movemnet's for ecample your frontails pars latrerails muscle's raises your eyebrows when you're surpirsed your'r orbiuclas oris tight your lips up show anger.\n\n\"The Facial expression for each are univesal\"' obsevers Dr. Huang \"even ttrough indivduals ofeten show carry's degree of expression like not smiling as brodly well using a video, in a real life face or in a paiting by weighinh the diffent units the software can even identfy mixed emotions as in Da vincis master pice each expression is compared to a neutral face.\n\nYes but no do i think this is valuable because i feel like my emotion's is my personal problems but if pschologist are using it to hep kids and people then yes i belive it is very valuable.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author of \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" supports his idea by using various different pieces of evidence while implementing the reality of the potentially dangerous exploration. The new developments in technology put furth a new pathway of innovation in reserach. With the new advancements in technology, scienctist are able to discover many similarities between Venus and Earth. The similarities also bring to view the danger of the planet Venus itself. Studying Venus is a worthy pursuit because of the new advancements in technology, the similarities between the two planets, and the possible challenges of researching the untamed planet.\n\nThe ever growing advancement in technology allows for the further reasearch of the neighboring planet Venus. For example when the author says, \"another project is looking back to an old technology\" to gain insite of what previously worked and what could be improved. Another piece of evidence is when the author states an improvement that can be made, \"Systems that use mechanical parts can be made more resistant\". The greater and never ending advancements in technology allows scientist to explore the vast similarities between our planet and Venus.\n\nThe similarities of Earth and Venus make the reserach worth wild and valuable. For example, Venus has become very fascinated by Astronomers because of how it is \"the most Earth-like planet in our solar system\" which suggests that the research we gain from Venus could affect how we think about the Earth. Another example is when the author suggests that, \"venus can sometimes be our nearest option for planertary visit\".\n\nEven with the similarities, the dangers of the planet can make the research difficult.\n\nThe conditions of Venus would make research very difficult but not impossible. The planet has many components that would make studying it very hard such as having, \" the hottest surface temperature\". Venus also has rough terrain and weather such as, \"erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightening strikes\" which would make landing a ship nearly impossible.\n\nIn conlcusion, the research of Venus is valuable to achieve because of the new technology, the likeness of our earth and Venus, and the challenges that will be faced during the reserach. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "dear senator:\n\nthe electoral college most be important that makes the people to chose what do they want it consists to make the people take their own desiton about who do they want to help them and make their lives better in al the ways, the electors have to be near the people of the town or city cause in that way the people feels more closer to them and they can trust the work of the electors.\n\nthe certificate of ascertainment declares that the winnig presidential elector in the state ans whows which elector will be represent the state at the meeting of the electors in december of the election year,that means that you help choose your state's electors when you vote for a president because when you voete for you candidate you are actually voting for your candidate's electors.\n\nafter a presidential election , the governor prepares a \"certificates\" of ascertainment\"\n\nyour state are sent to the congress and the national archives as part of the official records of the presidental election.\n\non source 1 the author is trying to explain how does this works,to help the people of the town and especially that if you vote that means that you are helping to the elctors and that probaly wil not help if you dont choose the correct person. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "As time has gone on, technology continues to advance. Whether this be televisions, cells phones, etc, technology has became more complex and has changed the way the society functions. This includes cars as well; their development has advanced well over the years, and continues to do so. People now have the luxuries of getting their learners permits, and eventually their license, as a means of easy transportation. However, cars without drivers has became a controversial topic, as manufacturers have tried to think of new ways to further move forward with technology. Cars without drivers though, would pose problems such as having to create new laws to regulate them, the ability to hack into them, and the overall expense and alertness of the \"driver\".\n\nAs of right now, traffic laws are written for cars that have human drivers. The vast majority believe that the only safe car is one with a driver, so states such as California, Nevada, Florida, etc, has made it illegal to even test computer driven cars. If driverless cars were to become a norm, new laws and codes would have to be created in order for them to be regulated. This could prove to be difficult in the case of what type of regulations would need to be made and passed. \"Still, even if traffic laws change, new laws will be needed in order to cover liability in the case of an accident. If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the maunfacturer?\" This shows that it is very possible to run into legal trouble with these new cars. The argument that these types of issues can be sorted out can be made, but there again, companies and people would still have to battle it out in court.\n\nAnother major issue that these cars would have is the easiness of overriding or hacking into them, since they are computer driven. People are known for hacking into social media accounts, government files, and so on. Who's to say that they wouldn't hack into a driverless car? \"...they still alert the driver to take over when pulling in and out of driveways or dealing with complicated traffic issues, such as navigating through roadwork or accidents.\" This explains that drivers have the ability to take over their car if they need to, suggesting that in the case of a hacker they could override them and take control, but the result of a crash could still easily become common. With this, it would also just prove to be more trouble legally because investigations would have to take place if there were a crash.\n\nDriverless cars would not only be difficult to manage, but the expense of manufacturing one can prove to be costly as well. They would most likely be difficult to buy in the first place, especially because of all the sensors that go into making it. \"For starters, they needed a whole lot of sensors. Google's modified Toyota Prius uses position-estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS receiver, and an inertial motion sensor.\" This not only proves that the cost of these cars would be high due to all of these sensors, but that a malfunction in even one of them can cause vehicle accidents. It is said though that sensors have become more advanced alolowing for better control than a human could have, but they would still be costly and technology has proven to not always be in our favor. Plus, drivers not having to take over unless the car signals them can also prove to be dangerous, as most \"drivers\" will probably not be paying attention. They will most likely be fixated on other means of entertainment or could even fall asleep at the wheel as they are no longer being relied on to navigate themselves, or people with them safely.\n\nDriverless cars overall would not be a good investment, time and money wise. Though technology is certainly always advancing, this type of upgrade in cars will not be necessary. They would be dangerous, costly, and difficult to manage legally. People would have a hard time driving with them since they can not control themselves a hundred percent, and hacking into a car and causing crashes would be a new problem society would have to deal with. The development of these cars would not be a very smart decision.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use of this technology to read students emotional expressions is not valuable. The software may be incorrect on how a studnet is feeling or it may be a intrution of personal space/information. The software may stop emotional communication for sure and or communication period.\n\nThe software may not always be accuate and be wrong on some parts. As the text states in paragraph 1. \"She's 83 percent happy, 9 percent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry.\". The way it gives percentages on how someone is feeling doesnt always mean thats what they're really feeling. Also when a software can recognize how a student is feeling it's sometimes a matter of invading personal information and/or thoughts. As the texts states in paragraph 5,\" For instance, you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face.\" connecting to \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,\", in paragraph 6. If a student is having issues such as feeling sad or mad about something they should be able to come to a teacher or adult themselves rather than a computer pointing it out. The same technology may be a threat for people to actually connect on a emotional level and nonverbal at all. In paragraph 6, it states, \"The same technology can make computer-animated faces more expressive-for video games or video surgery.\" connecting to \"Most human communication is nonverbal, including emotional communication,\".\n\nThe creators of the software inlcuded some good examples on why we would need this. In paragraph 1 it states, \"For instance, you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on their face. Of course most of us would have trouble actually describing each facial trait that conveys happy, worried, etc.\". It is true some of us would have trouble reading someone if they were depressed or unhappy. It would be good to have that reassurance to make sure they are okay and prevent something from happening to them. The software would help students in the classroom when they are having trouble undertsading something and the teaher is not around. As in paragraph 6 states, \"A classroom computer could recogize when a student is becoming confused or bored.. Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\"\n\nOverall I feel the software is not a very good idea, due to lack of communication and accuracy. Although it has some good values in it, it wouldnt be a good way for humans to tell their emotions and communication through one another.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Helpful But Not Needed\n\nHow far is too far? Sometime we as a human try to improve our ways of living for society, while some are good there are also some that go too far. Like the one Prof. Thomas Huang and Prof. Nicu Sebe try to create, they are making this a new software that they think will be an step toward the future. What they don't know is that they are also giving away some of our rights. We will be giving up some things Facial Action Coding System into the school system.\n\nThere are some unintentional consequences that will be caused by the the new software. The Facial Action Coding System will be ignoring our privacy as stated in the 1st paragraph. The machine knew exactly what the painting was feeling, it even know what percent of that feeling she was feeling. There are somethings that we want to keep for ourself, but how do we do that when a machine scans us and know exactly how and what we are feeling. There are things that some of us want to be kept hidden. You can't just change someone's emotion that easy, there are also somethings that you let a person go through on their own. We feel this way because we want to. When someone tells a bad joke, people might still laugh at it. If the software were expose us, the person who told the joke would lose confience and could be hurt. Lets say that someone was feeling disgusted but not because of something but because of someone, he/she(the person who is not feeling disgusted) will feel really sad and hurt. This software might have some bad to it but there are also some good side to it.\n\nSome of the good things this software would be good for was stated in paragraph 6. This software could help shopers and companies to sell their products. A good example would be for small companies that are not that popular or known, this new software would help them out a lot. This is all sunshine and rainbows but what about our privacy? This would mean that the software would constanly be scanning us for our emotions every single second we are on a device. It is stated that our PC can't handle this comples algorithms in paragraph 7, but that they would stil have simple instructions. This is even worse as it might only be able to tell one emtions unlike the Facial Action Coding System, and we would still be risking our privacy.\n\nIf the Facial Action Coding System was acepted into the school system this could be bad news. Imagine a classroom with this software in it, it could show if the students are bored or confused like what this article said in paragraph 6. Lets say the students were bored. What if the teacher is trying his best to make it intresting but also make the students learn at the same time, or what if this was how the teacher was taught to teach and was teaching like this for as long as he was teaching? What now? Won't this crush the teacher? The teacher tried his best, but the students are still bored, this will also make him want to try his best less and less. So what if the software can shows emotions? The Facial Action Coding System can be put in school, but it will just be a waste of money and it also have the potention of hurting more that it does of being benefitial.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding System is a software that makes humanity closer to the future but at a price. It seem like a great idea but it bring unintentional consequences. This can hurt our peers feelings, and will cause the people around us and even us to have lower self esteem. It is invasive to our privacy and it might not as effective when it is used in PC, which is where it would be most effective. If it was put in the schools it won't be benefitial to the student or the teachers as it will just have negative impact on the classroom. The Facial Action Coding System might sound like a new amazing invention that is out of this world, but the impact it have will not be good.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Florida State senator,\n\nI am in favor of changing the election by popular vote for the president of the united states. Changing the election by popular vote is more efficient than the electoral college process. Inputing this into the political voting system would enhance the voting process making it less difficult to deal with, get rid of the electoral college and its faults, and get the U.S citizens opinion on who the president should be and not just the electors voting for the president.\n\nAs you are already of aware of, the electoral college is the process where it consists of the selection of the electors, the meeting of the electors where they vote for President and the Vice President, and the counting of the electoral votes by congress. By the explanation of what the electoral college is, you and I and many others can conclude that this process takes too much work;much more work than really does need to be put into place. Even though most Americans aren't aware of that when they are electing for their choice of the president they comprimise with the most, they are really voting for electors to vote who the next president will be. It's not fair and it's not right.\n\nWhile reading an article about the electoral college(by Brad Plumer), I noticed that the electoral college system has numerous instances of it that make it wrong. While in place Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Bob Dole, and the U.S. chamber of commerce all agreed on abolishing the electoral college; And I compromise with this agreement because it is completely accurate and make sense as to why these political figures wanted to rid of the electoral college. This is called a \"Disaster Factor\" according to paragraph 11 in the article \"The Indefinsible Electoral College\" meaning that the state legislatures are literally responsible for picking electors, and that those electors could always defy the will of the people. How wrong is this? Also given that so many voter vote for one party for president and another for congress, the House of Representatives' selection can hardly be expected to reflect the will of the people.\n\nIn source 3 of the article, it was very precise on as to why the electoral college should no take place. Our country has both republicans and democrats. Not all democrats have the same opinions as republicans, and not all republicans have the same thoughts as democrats. According to paragraph 15, the Electoral college is widely regarded as anachronism, which is a non-democratic method of selecting a president that should be overruled by declaring the candidate who recieves the most popular votes is the winner. This is not fair to people who are democrats. The electoral system is obviously based off of mostly and strictly Republican beliefs. The voting process should be based on just republican bias, but also democrat bias. It's as if the democrats thoughts mean nothing. Paragraph 19 made a claim that Republican bias is baed strictly off of the region in which on lives, because majority of Reoublicans live in the southern states of the U.S. This makes other people(No party, Democrats, etc.) that are inhabited in othe regoins of the U.S. feel disenfranchised and feel as if their votes do not count, that the new president will have no regard for their intrests, and that this person is not really their president.\n\nThe article gave me an outlook of what the electoral college really is and how it works. The electoral college is not a fair process at all, and it is way the complicated for the people involved in some political job that is involved with the president, it is hard on the citizens that live in this country that have an idea of what president they want to vote for, and it is hard on us as a nation. The election process should be changed by the process of popular vote of the country's citizens. The electoral college is unfair, outdated and irrational. The electoral college needs to be abolished as soon as possible. Please take this into high consideration.\n\nFrom,\n\nPROPER_NAME\n\n01-26-15 ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear State Senator,\n\nElectoral Colleges have many resources on why they should still be in favor of keeping but I strongly disagree. Changing to election by popular votes for the president of the United States is way more resourceful because Electoral Colleges do not vote for the president of the United States and not all regions may have an opportunity to vote.\n\nTo begin with, Electoral Colleges do not vote for the president. Source 2 \"Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong\" states \" Under the electoral college system, voters vote not for the president, but for a slate of electors, who in turn elect for the president.\" This quote shows that if you vote for a slate of Republicans or Democratic electorss pledged the president but those electors won the statewide election, those electors would have to go to Congress and the president would get the amount of electoral votes the people have made. It's a process having Electoral College systems therefore, it's much easier having popular votes for the president.\n\nFurthermore, Source 3 \"Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the President\" argues \"No region has enough electoral votes to elect a president.\" This quote is stating that not everyone has a saying on who they want their president to be. Like people in the South may have many elctoral votes but not other regions like Northeast etc. The entire community should be able vote, everyone should be able to vote. Electoral college systems shouldn't be able to reject no ones vote. Moreover, changing elections to popular votes is better because people have a chance to vote the president they want.\n\nElectoral College systems may be in favor in many ways like the winner takes all method, or each candidate running for president having their own electors. In whatever case it may be it's not fair to people having their own votes being rejected. Like i said in my previous paragraph everyone should have a saying on whom they want their president to be.\n\nIn conclusion, I'm in favor of chaging the elections by popular votes for the preisdent of the United States because everyone has the saying on the president they wish to have. Electoral Colleges do not vote for the president of the United states and not all regions pf the United States have an opportunity to vote.\n\nSincerely, PROPER_NAME ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dr. Huang stated that his computer can identify a persons feeling just by scaning them. By the way it look the computer can verify a person experssions by the way that they look even thou some poeple in this world can understand expressions but techology is change and now it can nearly tell human emotion. But yet the differences here are that the computer can see emotions or no emotions at all.\n\nWell the step to take in order to see if a person is showing emotions it would muscular action units. For the instruction 1&2 will determin that techology can tell which from which like a smile canbe tested by a computer or a real person. A machine can tell the difference.\n\nWe need to look at the prons and cons cause a person can tell if a person is showing any emotion is how they are useing their mouth's muscular actions such as smiling or frowning. Telling a force one a real smile can be que trickey but a computer can tell the differences.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The planet venus is a danger place according to this article. The article talks about Venus the planet that hasn't being explore. in paragrapg 3 the author talks about some challenges. to begin with ''The thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets venus'' (paragraph 3 ). what the author is saying is that the atmosphere on Venus its so thick juts like if it was covering it up like a blanket. witch it's challenging for the space craft's. witch it could make the air craft explode cause the atmosphere its just like a shield for venuns that why in most of the space crafts that had tried to land in venus had failed and their has not beign one that had land in Venus for three decates. the author even talks about the temperature in venus in (paragraph 3 line 4) it saids \" on the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees fahrenheit\". If you think about what would happen to a human if it lands in Venus at that type of temperature or anything my guess would bw that everything that either land's or passes through venus burns. Although Venus is just like the sun\n\nbut its described as a big star. \"Also notable, venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system even though mercury is closer to our sun \" (Paragraph 3 line 9). In this line the author is refering of how hot Venus is mercury is the closet planet ot the sun but Venus still the hottest one.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Did the author support their idea well in this article? I do believe he did. I saw many reasons as to why we should at least try to go to venus. He gave many reasons as to how Venus is very simillar to Earth and could be inhabited one day. He also gave many reasons as to how it could be dangerous, and why people haven't really been able to do so yet. They mention things about what Venus has done to other space crafts in the past, and what it can do to others now even.\n\nThe author gives many reasons as to why Venus is reffered to as Earths \"twin.\" He says, \"Venus is the closest planet to Earth in density and size, and occasionally the closest in distance too.\" In this he tells us that Venus is like Earth in the ways of how dense it is and how large it is. He also says that it is occasionally close to us, so that shows us that it could be just like Earth, but with some differences. The author also says in paragraph 4, \"it may have once been the most Eath-like planet in our solar system. Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported many forms of like, just like Earth.\" With this he is telling us that there could be fossils, or we could one day maybe inhabit Venus if needed, with adaptations of course.\n\nThe author also says that the journey would be dangerous. He mentions in paragraph 2 \"each previous mission was unmanned, and for a good reason, since no space craft has survived the landing for more than a few hours.\" In this he is telling us just how dangerous it is, because tipically you would think of a machine being tougher than the human body, but as you think about it you can see just as fast as that machine was destroyed. If that machine was destoryed so quickly imagine how quickly the human body would be. He also says \"not a single spacecraft has touched down on Venus in more than three decades.\" This also lets us know how hard it would be to get there and how fast, if the right materials aren't used, something can be destroyed during the trip.\n\nThe author then gives us NASA's plan as to how somebody would be able to access Venus in paragraph 5. He tells us that \"NASA's possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would be to allow scientists to float above the fray.\" He gives us this idea so that we can think about it being a safer route and that maybe with this method somebody could be able to make it. With his evidence in the previous paragraphs we can conclude it would be very dangerous to land on Venus, but not to be above it. He also gives us a scenario of what it would be like for the scientists floating above. He tells us, \"a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up out of their way.. temperatures would still be toasy at arounf 170 degrees Fahrenheit, but the air pressure would be close to that of sea level on Earth... radiation would not exceed Earth levels. Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans.\" By telling us this he is saying that it wouldn't be the most comfortable thing, but it would be liveable. He is showing us that it would be possible, and if they really wanted to, they could explore Venus.\n\nIn paragraph 8 he mentions that the \"scientist floating above would only give limited insignt,\" with this we can see that there still wouldn't be everythig solved, but we would still be closer than we've ever gotten. He also says in paragraph 8, \"most forms of light cannot penetrate the dense atmosphere, rendering standard forms of photography and videography ineffective.\" Meaning that the scientists wouldn't be able to photograph anything on Venus to look at later. The scientists would only be able to look at things closet than anybody ever has, but not be able to document any of it. With this we can also see that we wouldn't be able to see what Venus looked like from Earth, making it hard to report back on findings and research.\n\nAll in all I beleive the author did support his idea well. He gave the pros and cons and was able to explain everything out. I myself don't know it it would be worth all the money in supplies, but I do think with NASA's idea we can get closer than we've ever gotten before. The conditions would be liveable, but maybe a little uncomfortable, and we could get some good information on Venus. If Venus is as closely related to Earth as the author makes it out to be, then maybe it could be worth a shot, but I am still debating on it. It's nothing the author did, because he did explain and support everything very well, but I've always had very strong opinions on everything. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars may seem like a good dream, but they may also be a nightmare. Many people want driverless cars to become a common thing, but they are rether risky. Driverless cars are dangerous as they can not steer through accidents or road construction, they could malfunction, and they ruin the milestone of getting your driver's license.\n\nMany of today's driverless cars can not navigate through complicated traffic, or even pull in or out of driveways without a human driver. \" They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead require human skills...\" They are not truly driverless as when a problem occurs the driver needs to step in. Now, that may not seem like a big deal but what if this driver was distracted? The car would crash. The few autonomous cars that there are now do have alert systems, but the driver may still find those alert systems distracting.\n\nOne big question about driverless cars is what if they malfunction, who is blamed for this malfunction? That question has yet to be answered as many traffic laws cause states to not even allow driverless cars on the road. This malfunction of the car could cause the car to not even be controlled by the driver in the car, which could lead to a horrifying amount of injuries. I believe that it would be the manufacturer at fault for building a faulty product.\n\nMany teenagers look forward to this first bit of freedom, known as recieving your driver's license. This milestone leads teenagers to the path of being a self-sufficient adult, but driverless cars ruin this self-suffiency\n\nas the teen would not be driving themselves. Do you really want to ruin the beginning of adult freedoms for the younger generations?\n\nDriverless cars are not truly driverless as they require human assistance to steer through accidents or road construction, they could malfunction causing the driver to become injured, and they ruin the milestone into self-sufficient adulthood.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Would you ever wonder what it would be like to go to Venus, well as often reffered to as Earth's twin. Many people suggest that Venus was somewhat like Earth long ago. In many cases people have been working on other projects like mechanical computers despite the chaos in Venus. Furthermore I think if we study Venus more challenges will come upon but, other good innovations will come too.\n\nOne reason why people should study Venus more is because more advancement in technology will come. Also more ideas from the scientist's on how to make airplanes travel at a high altitude. According to the article \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" \"Just as our jet airplanes travel at a higher altitude to fly over storms, a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions (5).\" Furthermore if studying Venus and creating technology we could have another so like Earth.\n\nAnother reason why people should study Venus is because it has some familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters. Also creating machines to last longer in Venus now that there has been some cases that other spacecraft don't survive. According to the article \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" \" Many researcher are working on innovations that would allow our machines to last long enough to contribute meaningfully to our knowledge of Venus (6).\" In addition if we create machines that can last long and survive the pressure, we could land in Venus for the first time.\n\nWhile some people may say what is the point in making spacecraft airplanes. People think that if making a spacecraft that the same thing will happen when they sent a spacecraft off to Venus and did not survive because of the pressure. \"On the planet's surface, temperatures average over 800 degress Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we experience on our own planet (3).\" Furthermore I justify that if scientist ever have the curiosity of going to Venus that they go.\n\nIn conclusion would you ever like to go to Venus and study? I surely would because it could tell me a whole lot about the planet. Also how it is different from all the planets from our solar system. Another the features and similarities that is has with earth. Lastly the technology that would come if we go to Venus.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Autonomous vehicles are slowly becoming a thing of the present rather than just the future. There are several things that must be taken into consideration when it comes to self driving cars. Things like safety, customer base, retail price, and the positive/ negative affects of autonomous vehicles.\n\nFirst off, How safe do you feel on a rollercoaster or on something that you aren't controlling? You might get that nervous feeling when you first step foot in a self driving car. These vehicles need to be safer than a rubber room, because if not, who's going to step up and take the blame for a gruesome accident? I can forsee lots of drivers blaming/ sueing self driving car compaies for that exact reason. Most of the companies who are developing self driving cars are giving the driver the option to take over when neccessary. They actually reccomend you take over whenever you feel danger on the road. To get these things on the market there are several steps that must be taken, including, driving laws.\n\nIn many states, testing of autonomous vehicles is illegal. California, Nevada, Florida, and the District of Columbia have been allowed limited testing on such vehicles. More states will join in once its proved that these cars are reliably safe. They can steer, brake, and accelerate by themselves but are programmed to give control to the driver whenever it is needed. Drivers must be alert at all times in order for these to be successful. People might think this is an easier way of driving, which it is but it doesn't take away the fact that you could still be badly injured or even killed. So alertness is always required.\n\nI think these vehicles could be a hit but several crucial details need to be straightened out before any everyday customer can purchase one. The leading companies on this project are very far away from making autonomous vehicles a hit among mainstream drivers but, I do believe sometime in the future we will have the option to purchase a self driving car.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus is the second closest to the sun. this means the temperature there is way higher than earths. This also means that the atmospheric pressure on venus is also way higher than earths\n\nVenus is second away from the sun this means its has a very great temperature. Venuses average temperature is about 800 degrees. Venuses atmospheric pressure is about 90 times what earths is. No space ship has lasted on venus for more then a couple hours. Scientist still believe that at one point long ago that venus could of been the most earth like planet in the solar system.\n\nScientist believe that to study this if they stayed about 30 miles above the surface of venus that they would be able to study venus. The temperature would still be toasty at 170 degrees but the atmospheric pressure would be equaivalent to that of sea level on earth. Solar power would be plentiful on venus and the radiation wouldnt exceed that of earths.\n\nScience shows that maybe right now venus isnt the most hospitable plant in our solar system but maybe at one time is was. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Ever since the late 50s, there has been talk of driverless cars. Some people are excited by talk of this advancement while others are skeptical. I believe driverless cars are a good idea because it would make the roads safer, it would be a great way to advance our current technology, and it would make driving more enjoyable.\n\nMany people feel as though our roads are safe with human drivers. However, in the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming,\" the author states, \"In reality, Google has had cars that could drive independently under specific conditions since 2009. Their cars have driven more than half a million miles without a crash....\" If those cars would have been driven by humans, a crash would have been inevitable. Any car that can drive more than half a million miles without a single crash should be considered much safer than a human driven car.\n\nDriverless cars will help society in more ways than just keeping us safe. Driverless cars will also help the advancement of our technology. In paragraph five it is stated, \"Within 10 years, those sensors had become more advanced to detect and respond to the danger of out-of-control skids or rollovers.\" This shows that in only 10 years of driverless car development, our technology has improved by a considerable amount. The more we work on this type of technology, the more information we will have to be able to advance in more areas than just cars.\n\nNot only can driverless cars really improve the functionality of human life, but also make it more enjoyable. Paragraph eight states, \"Some manufacturers hope to do that by bringing in-car entertainment and information systems that use heads-up displays.\" This means that while your self-driving car is taking you to work, you could be watching a movie, playing a game, or even working on an upcoming presentation. Some might feel this feature could cause some safety concerns, considering the driver might need to take control of the car. However, the same paragraph then states, \"Such displays can be turned off instantly when the driver needs to take over- something not available to drivers trying to text with a cell phone.\" This would actually make these displays a safety feature. Overall, driverless car can make getting in the car an enjoyable experience.\n\nIn conclusion, the develoopment of driverless cars will make our lives easier. The roads will be safer, our technology will be better, and the overall experience of life will be improved.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus started to form life just like Earth, many years ago, according to the text. The author supports this idea by giving examples and how can life can be formed in Venus. The author also gave information about how powerful earthquakes and lightning strikes can provoke Venus. The author also goes on by\n\nsaying how Venus was probably covered with oceans and could've had forms of life. And, life on Venus are very limited because forms of light don't happen very often according to the text. Also, I forgot to mention that technonlogy in Venus are powerful aswell, and also runs real quck/fast.\n\nIn the text it states,'' Venusian geology and weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes to probes seeking the to land on its surface.'' This is basically saying that Venus has very powerful weathers that is most likely to kill you if you live in Venus. In the text in paragraph 4 it states,'' Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.'' This sentence is basically saying that Venus could have been just like Earth. What I'm saying is that Venus could have been having human life, like for example, human can actually live in Venus for the rest of their lifes if they know how to live in extreme conditions. And finally, in paragraph 5, it states,'' Solar power would be plentiful, and radiation would not exceed Earth levels. Not easy conditions, but survivable for humans.'' Basically what this sentence is saying is that Venus is so hot that possible Venus might have the weather temperature just like Earth. Humans can live there but might be dangerous because the weather in Venus is so powerful and can kill you and growing food may be hard at times.\n\nIf you love bad weather and tend to challenge yourself on extreme living conditons, then Venus is the right place for you. What I'm basically saying is that if you love challenging yourself and how far you can become at extrme living conditions then Venus is the right place for you. Or, if you love technology and you want your modern phone, computer, etc to run fast, then Venus is the place for you. In paragraph 7, it states, '' Modern computers are enormously powerful, flexible, and quick, but tend to be more delicate when it comes to extreme pysical conditions.'' Basically, if you make mechanical parts can be made more resistant. If you challenge yourself (I'm not saying that you/one should live in Venus, that's your option) or our human mentality may lead in exploring Earth because our human brains may cause us to explore more Earth, until all Earth Edges. Like for example, nobody lives in Antartica and its off limits, we aren't allowed to visit Antartica and it's not owned by anyone. But, we as humans we are curious creatures that would like know everything or explore more Earth, or not just Earth but other planets. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Can you imagine not using a car when you go anywhere, not even up the road to the grocery store? Some people can't imagine living without cars, whereas some people already have made the transition, or are beginning to make the transition. Limiting car usage can cause people to be happier, have less stress, and can cause less pollution in the atmosphere for a healthier environment.\n\nLimiting car usage has been found to eliminate some of the stress people are having everyday. Cars are another liability that put stress on people everyday. What are you going to do if you get into a car accident, your car breaks down, or there is an overwhelming amount amount of traffic that causes you to be late to a big meeting. Without cars, people dont have that burden on their shoulders to carry around. In Vauban, Germany \"70% of Vauban's families do not own cars, and 57% sold a car to move here. \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way.\" Said Heidrun Walter, a media trainer and mother of two.\"\n\n(Source 1 P3).\n\nVauban is the beginning of what could be a worldwide transition that could help save the world.\n\nSaving the world may sound ridiculous when it comes to limiting the use of cars, but it's not. Cars are one of the leading causes in pollution and greenhouse gasses and have a large effect on the atmosphere. Cars influence the effect of global warming. In Paris, the smog reached a near record high and the city had to limit the use of cars for a period of time until the smog levels decreased. \"Last week Paris had 147 micrograms of particulate matter (PM) per cubic meter compared with 114 in Brussls, and 79.7 in London, Reuters found\"\n\n(source 2 P17).\n\nWithout the cars, the smog levels decreased and caused a healthier environment for the time being. With limited use of cars, the air that we breathe everyday will be healthier, and the environment will begin to recover decreasing the levels of global warming, which could eventually severely hurt the planet if it continues.\n\nThe need for owning a car has gone down in recent years, according to a study at the University of Michigan. In large cities, people are living without cars just as easily as people that do have cars becuase of public transportation, and just walking places. In both the USA and Colombia, people have shown that the need for cars is miniscule when you have other forms of transportation. In Colombia, the city of Bogota had its third consecutive \"car free day\" which happens once a year. The people of Bogota surprisingly enjoy it. \"Millions of Colombians hiked, biked, skated, or took buses to work\"\n\n(source 3 P20).\n\nThis is an opportunity to do many things for the people that live there which include taking away stress, causing happiness, and even getting a little exercise in that they might not get everyday. All in all, limiting the use of cars has proven to be effective everywhere it was tested.\n\nWithout cars, people may say the world would be a different place, and they're right when they say that. Who's to say it wouldnt be a better place? All over the world, cities are limiting the use of cars and the effect has been surprisingly positive. People are saying they feel less stressed, they feel happier, and the enivornment is happier too with less pollution. Who knew something so little, could have this large of an effect on people everywhere? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "What I think about the faces on mars is it is not from aliens. Why I think that it is not from aliens is because no one has really seen aliens. So no one would know if aliens were alive or not .\n\nThey put the photograph that they took of the face from mars . Sent it to websites because they thought it would get alot of attention. The image went viral on tv shows and radio talk shows. Most people thought that most of it was from aliens. Then you had other\n\npeople that didn't know how it got there. Scientistis were trying to figure out how it got there.\n\nThis is what I think about the face being on mars.The\n\nfaces on mars arent really from aliens.The faces on mars are natural to the evierment . Aliens didn't make the face on mars. That is why I think they are not made from aliens. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that diverless cars would be a cool concept to have. There are some really great ideas behind it. First of all they're driverless. That itself just seems really cool. There's a problem though. they aren't completly driverless yet. they'd still need help with backing up, traffic jams, and other not so usual occurences.\n\nOne huge problem that might come up would be car wrecks. What if the car is drving itself with a passenger and get into a wreck. The person in the other car gets hurt. Who is responsible? Would the car company or the person in the driverless car? Even when driverless cars become a thing, they'd have to make and edit laws to cover liability in the case of an accident.\n\nEngineers at Berkley tried to make a driverless car by magnets. They used \"smarter roads\" instead of \"smarted cars.\" The car read te positive and negative polarity as messages in binary code. They worked really well but for it to work on the open road, you'd have to make massive upgrades to existing roads. That would not be cheap. That's where the idea of smarter cars came into play.\n\nWhen manufacturers turned to smarter cars they realised they'd have to have a lot of sensors. In the 1980's automakers used speed sensors at the wheels in the creation of antilock brakes. They became more advanced and detect and respond to the danger of \"out-of-control\" skids or rollovers. They can send information to the car to apply brakes on indivisual wheels and reduce power from the engine.\n\nSmart, driverless cars can be the future. It won't be anytime soon but when they come, they'll take the world by storm. Be ready so you don't have to get ready. When they step in, they'll steal the show, because they are already getting ready. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article The Challenge of Exploring Venus, the author describes the difficulty of having humans on the planet but the many benefits it could bring scientists is without a doubt great. The author shows this idea in a fairly well manner by, explaining how people could inhabit the planet, how we would have unmanned vehicles on the surface, and explaining how it would help us study hostile enviroments.\n\nThe author explains how could inhabit this hostile planet with the surface being so hostile. NASA proposes an aerial vehicle like the following, \"Imagine a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape.\" This means that some solar powered vehicle would either orbit or hover around the atmospher of Venus far above it's hostile landscape.\n\nSecondly, the author explains how we could have unmanned vehicles on to the dangerous surface that Venus provides. They propose using an old technology that would be able to operate under these hostile conditions without melting as modern electronics generally do, \"Another project is looking back to an old technology called mechanical computers.\" This shows that with the more resiliant domputers they would be able to last a much longer amount of time then their modern counterparts.\n\nLastly, we would be able to study these hostile enviroments with a combination of these two technologies that sould be put to use by scientists and astronauts. If this mission were succesful we would be able to understand alot more about these hostile enviroments, \"Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors.\" This shows that if we managed to succeed in such a mission it would be extremely beneficial to humanity in the future.\n\nSo even though the author points out that traveling to Venus is such a daunting task, we should still put the effort in to explore this planet. The author points out these points very effectivley but they could have been supported furthermore by listing more benefits to exploring such a hostile enviroment.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Sir I belive that u are wrong when u say that the mesa was made by extra terestrials. I believe this to be tru because, mesas are a common land mass in tharea that the \"face\" was found, There is a sharper image of the mesa that shows that it was not made aliens.\n\nIn paragraph two of this article\n\nline two states \" Scientist figured it was just another martian mesa, common enough around Cydonia, only this one had unusual shadows that made it look like an Egyptian.\" other evidence in this article that backs my state ment ar as follows. \" Defenders of the NASA budget wish there was an ancient civilization on Mars.\"\n\nIn paragraph 6 of the article line 2 state \"Thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first appeared on a JPL web site, revealing... a natural landform.\" Line 3 states \"There was no alien monument after all.\"\n\nHence there is no way that the mesa could had been made ny aliens. The evidence is every where in the articles about it and there is even more in the article i showed you. So again there is no way in this scientific feild that would support your theory that the mesa was made by aliens. But I do see where you might have thought that on first glance.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Imagine that you sitting in a car and not having to do anything but relax yourself. Imagine watching movies and do whatever you want in a car without having to worry about looking out for cars, getting in an accident, or having to move your leg constantly. This is when driveless car comes in. Developing driveless cars will make our lives much easier. Pollution would not be much of a problem anymore. We won't have to worry about fuel price or having to take a driving test.\n\nDriveless cars are cars that are made from trustable computers. Just like the name, driveless cars doesn't need human to drive it. It could drive itself but when it requires human skills, it will notify it. When the driver needs to take over the driveless car, there will be a headsup display. The driveless cars could take you anywhere you like without you having to worry about having to drive long distance or getting in an accident. All you have to do is relax and when your skills are needed, take control over and fix it.\n\nDeveloping driveless cars will help prevent air from polluting. People will drive less and less cars will be develop. If we creat more driveless cabs rather than creating cars, more people would want to take the driveless cab. When most people in the world are driving their own cars, every years the air is more polluted. By creating driveless cars, we are helping the air from being polluted by carbon dioxide.\n\nHave you ever worried about fuel prices? There won't be anyone who does not worry about fuel price in this world. The price could go up or it could go down in a day. By developing driveless cars, you would not have to worry much about fuel price. According to the text, it saids that driveless cars would use half the fuel of today's taxis. Not having to worry about fuel price means alot.\n\nDeveloping driveless cars will make our lives much easier. We won't have to worry about having to focus on the road, worrying about the fuel price, air being polluted, or getting into an accident. Would you rather have a car that you can relax yourself in or a car that needs your attention?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Face of Mars\n\nThe face on Mars has grown popularity over the idea of exterterrestrial life on mars. The face on Mars has many scientists taking sides if the face is exterrterestrial life or is it a rock land formation. Conspiricy theorys are spreading that NASA is hiding something from the public. Why would NASA hide anything about the face if it would fund NASA to grow and explore more, NASA has made 2 trips to identify what the face really is and both trips they ave come to the conclusion that it is a rock, There are few scientists that actually believe that it is exterterrestrial life.\n\nWhy is NASA being accused of hiding something from the public if they would benefit from discovering something that has to do with exterterrestial life? The Conspiracuy theories are ridiculous and it is completly idiodic to think that people would hide something if they wold benifit from it. NASA has also made 2 trips to prove that it is a rock foramtion on the suface and not exterrterrestrial life. NASA has researched the face and proved that is is a rock formation because it is similar to the land formation here on earth. There are also few scientists that believe the face is exterterrestrial life. The scientists that work for NASA have studied the face and it has been scientifically proven that the face is a rock formation.\n\nThe face is a rock landform but I could see why NASA would keep it a secret if it wasn't a rock landform. NASA might keep it a secret to avoid mass panic throughout the world, but that is very unlikely that it would be alien life because we have similar land formation to the face on Mars. The conspiricy theorys are ridiculous because NASA wouldnt hide that because it would benefit them and their space program and would earn money to adventure further into space and have better technology. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Today, automobiles are responsible for 12 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe and up to 50 percent in some areas of the United States. To lower this statistic, many cities around the world are trying to cut down on car use in order to curb their greenhouse gas emissions. Cities like Vauban, Germany, Paris, France, and Bogota, Colombia have their own strategies for the reduction of these emissions from cars. These cities are having extraordinary success and many Americans are limiting their car usage as well.\n\nIn Vauban, Germany, many residents have given up their cars. This is due to the strict rules and limitations for car ownership in this experimental new district. If one would like to own a car, large garages that cost $40,000, along with a home must be bought. This has made many residents completely give up the use of cars and rely on public transportation and bicycles. In the article, \"In German Suburb, Life Goes on Without Cars\" by Elisabeth Rosenthal, one resident stated,\"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way.\" Residents are embracing this new and innovative lifestyle and as a result, the greenhouse gas emissions from this area in Germany has decreased exponentially. The location of stores and businesses has also changed due to the very few who use automobiles. In the article, it is revealed, \"In this new approach, stores are placed a walk away, on a main street, rather than in malls along some distant highway.\" Even with these limitations, residents are not complaining and as a result, new suburbs around the world may start to look and be like Vauban, Germany.\n\nMany cities around the world are being forced to issue partial driving bans in order to clear the air of the city. In the article, \"Paris bans driving due to smog\", by Robert Duffer, it is explained how and why the city of Paris was forced to issue partial driving bans due to the very high levels of smog. Duffer writes, \"On Monday, motorists with even-numbered license plates were ordered to leave their cars at home or suffer a 22-euro fine ($31). The same would apply to odd-numbered plates the following day.\" Due to this partial ban, congestion was down 60 percent and 4,000 drivers were fined. These fined drivers paid, in total, around 88,0000-euro($124,000). Not only did the pollution decrease dramatically but this money went back to the government. The article then reveals, \"The smog cleared enough Monday for the ruling French party to rescind the ban for odd-numbered plates on Tuesday.\" After just one day, the results that was wanted by the city of Paris were achieved. This is absolutely astounding and very beneficial to the city of Paris and also to Europe as a whole.\n\nLike in Paris, France, in Bogota Colombia, car-free days have been established. In the article, \" Car-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota\", by Andrew Selsky, the Day Without Cars in Bogota is detailed. Like in Paris, there were fines for violators, however this time it is $25. Due to the fine, many of the 7 million resident used public transportation, taxis, bicycles in order to get where they needed to go. One resident said, \"It's a good way to take away stress and lower air pollution.\" As a result of the success that Bogota has with these car-free days, more than 118 miles of bicycle paths have been made, sidewalks have been repaired, and many new restaurants and shopping districts have emerged. Other cities in Colombia and other cities in South America want to follow Bogota's lead. In the article, the mayor of Asuncion, Paraguay Enrique Riera, is quoted saying, \"These people are generating a revolutionary change, and that is crossing borders.\" Hopefully, the car-free days that Bogota has will be common around South America and eventually around the world.\n\nA new global trend is emerging and that is the decrease in car usage. Cities like Vauban, Germany has a large majority of its residents using public transportation and bicycles and many residents have acceoted and embraced this lifestyle. Cities like Paris and Bogota have partial driving bans and car-free days, respectively, and as a result smog and pollution in the air has decreased and many residents feel like it is a good way to take away stress. These changes bans and car-free days have lowered pollution dramatically and many feel like this is a good path for the future. Limiting car usage is beneficial to the world and these cities have proven that it can be achieved without many issues and hopefully many other cities around the world will copy this innovative new idea toward decreasing greenhouse emissions. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Technology has been used for decades in education, from the basic computer to smart boards technology has been commonly used to improve the learning capabilities of students in modern times. The 'Facial Action Coding System'\n\ntechnology has the ability to help professors and teachers around the world get more into the minds of their students and engage the students into a classroom where learning is not a unified thing, but more customized and free depending on student ability.\n\nFirstly, with technology becomming more popular, an increasing number students are having the ability to learn through technology. Along with that teachers and professors around the world have had to adapt to the higher usage of technology and programs to teach their students. This program gives teachers and technology the ability to adapt to their students, and encourage even confused or fearful students to learn by engaging a learning environment where a student's computer or device could read and recognize the confusion or joy a student is undergoing while learning,and therefor helping the teacher know the students level of understanding.\n\nSecondly, having a program installed into the lense of cameras in students devices would open up new insight to teachers. For example, if a student watches a video lesson in a History class and is confused by something then their teacher could find the question, or peice of video, and simply adjust the lesson to fit the demographic and understanding of that child. There are many benifits to this technology including in the home, if a parent were to have the ability to see where their child was confused or frusterated the parent could also take some time to cover the missing material. This also prevents students who are fustrated but are to fearful or anxious to ask for help to not recive the assistance they need. This technology could open up door ways for students instead of them being lost in the information, but this technology is still new. .\n\nFinnaly, one of the main reasons students do poorly in the current education system is that the student feels like they are not reciveing enough help or that they are lost. With average class sizing being anywhere from 22-32 students, a single or even two teachesr cannot assist all of the students individualy, and this creates a problem. Using the 'Facial Action Coding System' teachers can register which students need help and those who dont and pay more attention to the students who need help. This would therefore increase the amount of students able to retain information and help the school. Being lost in a lesson wouldn't be so common of a problem.\n\nIn conclusion, the 'Facial Action Coding System' opens new advancments in the the education systems by encourgaing an environment where teachers could have the technology to know when a student was confused or not understanding information, and also giving the ability for teachers to construct a lesson to fit the children who don't directly understand. It also proves a good method for parents to get involved in their child's learning and help the student with direct problems at the root instead of complications with the entire subject. So yes, this technology is very vaulable to the education of millions of students around the world who don't fully grasp their teachers learning methods or are just confused.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Emotions, something often looked over due to it's constant presence. The FACS, or Facial Action Coding System, is a new software that has the ability to read emotions based off of facial features. Now, it is easier than ever to be able to comprehend what someone is feeling. This software proves to be extremely helpful in a working environment like the classroom.\n\nFirst, an understanding of how it works. The computer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face. With video imagery and muscle scanning, ones emotions can easily be read. For example, if you were surprised, then the computer will read that your frontalis pars lateralis muscle would raise your eyebrows. This software is even able to identify mixed emotions and when someone is faking a facial expression. This technology is solely based around the users facial muscles, and the difference between a fake smile or a real one is evident to the computer.\n\nNext, this software proves a huge advancement in technology. With the FACS, the computer can tell when you are genuinely enjoying what you are doing or not. For example, if you had a class assignment and you started to get bored, the computer would instantly recognize it due to your facial expressions being read. Like an effective human instructor, the assignment could be modified to be able to grasp the attention of the user once more. This creates a learning envirnoment that will suit everyone. If a student was confused, the software would pick up on it and create an easier way of understanding. Now, falling behind could potentially become something of the past.\n\nOutside of the classroom, this piece of technology could be equally beneficial. If one was browsing the web, an ad is more than likely to pop up. Sometimes ads can be annoying, but other times it can catch your interest. If an ad popped up and the user's facial expression shows interest, then more ads could appear that are similiar to that one. If an ad appeared that brought disgust or a lack of interest to one's face, then the computer will know to produce less ads that are similiar to that. Now, there is a truly self-customizable web experience.\n\nSafety could become a huge aspect in this software. As an example, someone who could be planning to shoot up a school or create a terrorist attack would be much more recognizable. Web monitioring for the emotinal boost could serve as a form of security. If there was someone who used their facial muscles to produce an expression of curiosity while searching through guns or ways to produce weapons, this person would now be able to be monitored and caught much quicker. Also, if someone's facial expressions give off a look of derpression, then their web browsers could be monitored for key words such as suicide. This software now help prevent leading issues in todays twisted society.\n\nIn conclusion, the FACS is a more than helpful tool that can serve many purposes. It can create an experience for the user that will benefit their interests and learning process. It could help prevent wrongdoings by the user to the outside world. It can help protect the user from wrondoings even to themselves. This software will change the world for ever in a more than beneficial way.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars, sounds like a figment of a childs imagination,but that figment may become an actuallity in the next decade.Google has proven since 2009 car have been able to operate autonomously under certain conditions and, many car dealerships have trying to make perfect autonmous or at least semi-autonomous car.The thought of driverless cars ferrying passengers to thier destinations is quite the thing to marvel at,Think of the time saved that could be used to for greater purposes, but several states have laws preventing computer driven car from even being tested which may be changed later on\n\nThe first benfit of these semi-autonomous vehicles would be that the driver would be free to preform other tasks for work, school, or simply catch up on rest.And should a situation that the car could not handle arise, the car will be alert the occupent of the driver seat so that they could take control.This idea is stated clearly in the passage,\"the Google car simply announces when the driver should take over.\" thus preventing any mistakes or accidents caused by the on board computer.\n\nSecondly,another benefit of the vehicles would be a decrease of accidents and accidents related deaths.While human drivers have a high degree of control over thier car, an on board computer would be able to control all the functions of the car with the utmost precision thus leading to less mistakes, along side the fact that the cars will have sensors of all varity to insure a constant awareness of of it's surrondings.\n\nFinally, some people argue that due to current driving and trafic laws testing, let alone driving, an autonomous vehicle is illegal.And they would be correct that current traffic laws prevent this, who is to say these laws won't be changed and that there won't be new laws made to specificlly govern these vehicle.\n\nSo in conclusion, while we may be a distance away from hitting the road it's still going to come ,and it will come new laws, new technology, and new ideas.so the last question is will you join in this innovation or will you be left in the dust.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think you should join seagoing cowboys beacause its a great way to explore the world. Also because you get to help people around the world. So i think you should join keep reading for more information.\n\nIn this stoy it said that \"besides helpng people, I had the side benefit of seeing Europe an China.\" It also says \" It took about two weeks to cross the Alantic ocean\" but it does take awhile but you can at lease enjoy it as much as you can.\n\nIn the sixth paragraph it pretty much takes a long time to get there. If you have pashans and isn't scared of the ocean or gets bored easlie. Then this isn't something that you should do. If you do have pashanchs and doesnt get bored easlie this is a thing for you too do. It has alot of picturn oprtunates of the sunrise and everthing.\n\nIf this program sounds really fun and you think you will enjoy it then you should do it. Follow your dreams. Dont let anything stop you frrom doing this. By the way this program is for boy's so if you aren't one go do something else im sorry but this is for GUYS ONLY!\n\nThank you for reading this I hope you plan on joying this program. For more information you can find it online. So once again thank you for reading this i hope you enjoied this!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "NASA is a goverment funded project that uses science facts, pictures, and advanced technology. NASA has been constintally working hard and, according to the article \"Unmasking the Face on Mars.\"\n\n\"NASA's Viking 1 spacraft was snapping photos of possible landing sights for its sister ship Viking 2, when it spotted the shadowy likeness of a human face.\" As soon as NASA saw the picture they instantly started going to work to see what it was.\n\nNASA has already created scientific technology for this reason. They would want to get the best looking picture and the most acccurate one. The acticle states, \"Michael Malin and his Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC) team snapped a picture ten times sharper than the original Viking photos.\" The first immage they snapped revealed that it was nothing but a landform, but still people were not satisfied. On April 8, 2001 another photo was captured at the cameras maxium view. Each pixil spanned 1.56 meters, compard to Vikings 43 meters per pixel\n\nNASA has been specifically designed to explore outer space and to discover what was there. They have been working even before 1976, Thats more than 40 years! They have only had a number of break throughs, proving that NASA would not hold back information about ancient civilizaions or alien lifeform because it would be a great breakthrough. The defenders of the NASA budget even wished there was an ancient civilization on mars. There was a degree of suprise for mission controllers at the Jet Propulsion Lab when the face appeared. They were fascinated by what they saw.\n\nThe alien conspiercy believers may reject the pictures and say they have been tampered with. NASA would not do that, however. They have already spent loads of money for this project and made all the equipment. They would not go through all that trouble just to lie to the public. NASA also took may pictures with their instruments from many angles and different views. They are high resolution photographs and they even have 3D alimetry, according to the article \"Unmasking the Face of Mars.\"\n\nOverall, NASA is an important space project that is honest and truthful about their work. They prove their claims with scientific facts and photos. They have the brains, tools, and budget that allows them to do that. If the public is not happy with their results they will find a different way to show it and find more evidence that will satisfy them.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The articles explain that the limited use of cars or automobiles is to our advantage. Two reasons that support this theory is that one you won't have to stress about buying a car and making sure everyone has one, and second you will help to protect the environment from the harmful gases of automobiles.\n\nThe limitation on cars may have its advanatges because, among the billions of people on this earth many of them own cars. Many vehicles give off harmful pollution gases to the environment and can cause many endangering problems to people as well. Evidence from source 2: \"Paris bans driving due to smog\" can support the following... \"After days of near-record pollution, Paris enforced a parial driving ban to clear the air of the global city.\" This evidnce supports the fact that there was enough smog in the air that led to the prohibition of cars for a limited time. This is to the people's advantage because they were now able to breathe fresh air instead of smog. Another piece of evidence also comes from source 2: \"Paris bans driving due to smog\" \"Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France, after five days of intensyfying smog...[The smog] rivaled with Beijing, China, which is known as one of the most polluted cities in the world.\" This evidence shows that smog causes pollution which is harmful in many ways. It also shows just how much of a difference just five days of limitation on vehicles can help reduce pollution. So the sooner people can see what banning cars can do to their health and well-being then maybe they will see what the love and cherish so much, can actually be hurting them.\n\nCar limitations may be the best thing yet for America and other places in the world. By banning cars we could reduce a lot of stress and the worry about the payments and supplying the vehicle with gas. Evidence that can support this comes from source 4: \" The End of Car Culture\" \"the number of miles driven per person was nearly 9 percent below the peak and equal to where the country was in January 1995....recession, because cash strapped Americans could not afford new cars, and the unemployed weren't going to work anyway.\" This explains that many Americans cannot even afford cars. So they go about their days just fine taking public transportation or receivin rides from friends. So by banning cars we could actually reduce the stress of not having a car or making the payments on them... plus we would have better health. Out of the estimated 7 billion people on this earth, it is not guranteed that all of them around the ages of 15 and above are equipped with a a vehicel of their own. Evidence from Source 4: \"The End of Car Culture\" can support the following \" What most intrigues me is the rates of car ownership per househols and per person started to come down two to three years before the downturn,\" Thi just goes to show you that not only are cars bad for the enviornment and people's health but, they are bad financially for people to maintain and keep up. The automobile is what changed America back in the day. But it is causing some damae to us now.\n\nCar limitations have some advanatges that are probably very beneifcial to us. We may think that cars are our only way of transportaion and that you need them to survive but, that is not necessarily true. Cars are great but up to a certain extent. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The \"Face of Mars\" was a huge discovery for the scientists at NASA. Not because of the discovery of Cydonia's face, but rather the attention and funding NASA recieved due to peoples' anticipation of aliens on Mars. The face has been confirmed, by NASA, to not be an alien structure; however, conspiracy theorists and people in denial think what NASA says is a lie.\n\nIt is a fact that the Face of Cydonia is only a unique natural landmass (Paragraph 1) The search for the truth of Cydonia started in 1976 when NASA's Viking 1 spacecraft was circling Mars and was snapping pictures for where its sister ship, Viking 2, could land. the Face of Cydonia was spotted when the Viking 1 circled the region of Cydonia. The face resembled a shadowy likeness of a human face. (Paragraph 2) After the image was surveyed by the mission controllers in the Jet Propulsion Lab, there was an assumed uproar of excitement; however, after all the excitement, Scientists figured it out. It was another Martian Mesa that had a unique resemblense of an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh.\n\nWith all this information, people should've been convinced but some still weren't. Scientists over at NASA have come out with the original 1976 image of Cydonia's face. Later on more information had come out and on April 5, 1998, the Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia and snapped a picture ten times sharper than the original and it gave even more evidence of the face being a butte. People who weren't convinced, or conspiracy theorists, still believe the Face of Cydonia is pure evedience of Aliens even after the second picture.\n\nThe Face of Cydonia, factually, is a landmass. For all you people who still don't believe that, you have all the evidence to counter your claims. For example, in paragraph (5), it states that some people like you believe the face of Mars is \"Bona fide\" evidence of life. you believe that the U.S Government, with NASA, would rather hide any evidence to support the claim of aliens. to counter your claims, NASA used your tax dollars by funding a third expedition to Cydonia. In paragraph (10), it states that on April 8, 2001, NASA took the Mars Global Surveyor close enough for a second look. They found Cydonia's Face and snapped a picture ten times better, in resoulution, than the last one and they gathered even more evidence supporting their claim. Lastly, you conspiracy theorists say NASA is hiding eveidence, yet they gave everyone the images from 1976, 1998, and 2001, with the dates they were taken; even with, the resoulution, camera name, and the pixel size.\n\nIn conclusion, all of you conspiracy theorists' counter-arguements have no evidence to back them up; however, NASA has all the evidence of the Face of Cydonia, being a Martian landmass. NASA also has given everyone the eveidence they even gathered. The Face of Cydonia was an exciting discovery, but people who were too excited, were angry with the truth; as a result, conspiracy theorists and defenders of the NASA budget came out in an uproar of denial. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that driverless cars is not a good idea, because you aren't in total control of what the car does. I also believe that it is bad, because what if the car malfunctions, or is hacked. You could be killed from the cause of letting a computer drive you. Furthermore, I fully believe that GM and Google, as well as other known representatives, should not support such a dangerous and risky product. This could lead to more deaths than there has ever been. To even think that this is a good idea, would not only lead me to question your thoughts, but it will also lead to me questioning your reasoning for this. Psychologically speaking, If you are to lazy to drive, then you are too lazy to get out of the house and walk to a driverless car. I would hope to think so. Also, within this paragraph Sergey Brin evnvisions a driverless taxi system. What if no one wants to pay for a driverless taxi? What if no one wants to risk their life for a computer to drive them to their destination? These simple questions lead me to question the thought of this experimentation itself. I furthermore would like to say, that you should not seek to create everything on tv. Somethings can be created, but a driverless car is something you do not want to create. If you are going to put yourself in a computer driving car, then why don't you just make a robot that can drive the car. I am not supporting this cause at all, because I feel that there is no need for something to operate a dangerous machine, let alone a car. This is a daredevil move, and I will not operate in supporting, and or standing up for this in any way. In conclusion, I see that driverless cars are not a thing for me, and I do not believe that they should be put on the market, or for sale. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author starts by giving us examples how Earth and Venus are similar to eah other and giving us information how Venus could be a planet were they used to be life before. He or she was explaning the diffrences how the degrees are diffrent and their higher on Venus but he came to the conclusion that how it could be a livible planet. So on paragrah 5 the author says that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) that they have the idea of sending people to explore it so this menas they are actually serious about this. The author explains how they are some bad stuff before sending people so they are comimg up with ideas how the mission can be complete with no failures so this mens that we have the knowledge but we dont have the right things to complete this mission. On paragraph 8 it blow my mind that hes actually right about how we are curios about anything we cant reach with our hands so we try harder to obtain the impossible, we have a huge universe but we will never be satisfy until we reach a dead end.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "How I feel about this driverless car situation is it's pointless and dumb. Just lets continue driving how we are and don't change anything. I mean if technology do change anything it just should be what type of cars it is. Driverless cars seems cool but its just to much.\n\nMe as a person I dont care to much about what type of car I have or what it look like. The only thing about my car that I would be worried about is how it's working and how much gas I got in it. Stuff like this is very pointless to me.\n\nBut ok, let's say they do change the cars to driverless. Yes I would still drive I mean it's not that bad. If they do so, I would defintely suggest they make the roads smarter. In the passge it says the roads work good suprisingly but it's expensive. Hey, if they're tripping off that they shouldn't have change it. I even saw that coming.\n\nThe idea is cool, but me I would rather stay with the reuglar cars and regular driving. Im not to much in cars no way. But coming with this you have to be pretty smart and know how to handle all the stuff that's coming with it. Im pretty sure most people a like this idea though. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that we should not have that in are classes because that would make people fill unhappy to come to school. Then that wouldamke people not want to come to school because the teachers would know how we are filling today and whats on our minds. Then they would know what we are thinking. Then they would know when we are happy, when we are mad, when we are sad , when we just dont care anymore. Like they said in the first line she? 83 percent happy, 9 ercent disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry. Then they said that? not your science teacher, grading your latest lab assignment. They start to talk about how many major muscles in the modle must move like human muscles. there are 44 major mucles that must move like human mucles. Thats just in the face. The movement of one or more mucles is called an ¨action unit.¨\n\nThey tell you to do this one fun lab thing you can do while you are looking in the mirror at home.\n\nIt gives you step by step how to do the lab. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars does sound nice but it may not be the best thing for us. People may take the driverless cars for advantage. Driverless cars allow you to drive without really driving the car. This sounds wonderful but have we really took everything into consideration.\n\nFirst of all people may think that since you arent really driving they can take this oppertunity to do the things they werent able to do when they are driving the car, such as do their make-up, or talk on the phone, or even text. \"The human driver must remain alert and ready to take over when the situation requires.\" The driverless car isnt really driverless. The driverless cars still require drivers and people to pay attention.\n\nSecondly the driverless car may have an manufactorual mess up while in the middle of driving. If this happens will the car be able to alert the driver then? Will the driver be able to take control of the situatuion? \"Wouldn't the driver get bored waiting for their turn to drive?\" Waiting on your turn to drive might get very boring. There's nothing to do, you don't get to control the car in any way and it may get frustrating not being able to do anything.\n\nWhat would happen if you got into an accident? \"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the manufacturer?\" The answer is they dont really know, you would probably have to go through a lot of work and judicial cases just to be able to insure that it wasn't your fault. Would you put your life in the hands of a man made machine that you have no control over? These machines can go wrong at any giving moment in multiple ways.\n\nSure driverless cars are cool but will it keep us safe 24/7? Do we have all the legal stuff aline to continue the production of the driverless cars? Are humans responsible enough to have driverless cars? These are questions that we should take into consideration when driverless cars come into play. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In theory a self driving car is a great idea, but in reality it is an accident waiting to happen. Self driving cars have many flaws to them. I beleive the development of these cars should no longer continue.\n\nThe self driving cars are never self driving, they still require the passenger to be there when it does not know what to do. The artical says \" The car can read the positive and negative polarity as messages in binary code.\" This means that someone can send a wrong message through a computer, causing an accident. The death rate from car accident could rise with the development of the self driving car. Whith hearing that would you trust your child to be in that car?\n\nPeople who agree to continue the development of these cars have many of theair own opinions. They say that the sensors on the car help make it safer.\n\nThey also might say that its a lot less stressful for the driver. The accepters of this product may also say that all safty measures are taken care of.\n\nThere are many things wrong with many of the statements above. The sensors on the car can go bad, how will the person know before its to late? How is a self driving car less stressful for the driver? If anything they would have to pay more attention to the road to make sure the car was working correctly. The safty procations of these vehicals rely on the driver noiticing the car is speakinging to it or that the seat is vibrating. Sometimes people do not feel my phone vibrate in their pocket or hear if for that matter, how are we suppoded to trust a car to alert you if we can not trust our phones.\n\nThrough out this campaign to have self driving cars it seems there is no one out there that wants to ask the hard questions, everybody thinks it is a great idea because it is new. Will this product be safe, we dont know, but it doesnt look promissing. In conclusion i do not beleive we should continue the devlopment for self driving cars. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming,\" the author is helping the argument between the use of driverless cars and modern day drivers seem more clear, stating facts from both points of the agrument. If driverless cars were to be the new modern day car that everyone has, it seems that drivers would be more safe, assisted, and have more freedom. Driverless cars are definitely something that should be in consideration for the future.\n\nSince drvierless cars are not controlled by the human mind, the cars would be safer than modern day cars with human drivers. From the article, the author says that the driverless cars have gone more than half a million miles without getting into a wreck. For a car with a driver, inside and outside of the car is full of distractions. Humans are prone to have a wreck before the first half of a million miles that it drives a car. However, the driverless cars do not wreck so easily, since it is aware of its surrounds unlike human drivers.\n\nEach human driver is going to make a mistake since no one is perfect on this planet. With driverless cars, all people are given more assistance than they would have if they were driving on their own. In the text, the author states that the cars can brake, steer, and accelerate themselves without the help of the driver. That could very easily save the lives of drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. If a person were in the car and had to get something from the back seat, but was in a non driverless car, the driver could potentiallly crash into someone else or run a stop light. However, if a person were in a driverless car and had to get something from the back seat, the car would automatically stop at the stop light then continue to drive for them. It lets the driver be sure that the car will assist them in a dangerous situation.\n\nFor the drivers in the driverless cars, they will have more ability in the driver's seat than the drivers in the non driverless car drivers. From the text, the author says that they can soon have the ability to turn on and off the personal driver. If that it so, then turning on the personal car will allow drivers to be permitted with their phones in hand. The law of having no phones while driving continues to be broke day-by-day. It is possible, in the future, that someone could have their phone in their hands while their car drives them to work. By default, you would have a very productive day at work with that.\n\nHowever, people say that driverless cars are unsafe and could come with many mistakes in their products. Humans nor machines are perfect, but most machines are highly more intelligent than an average human being is. Most people would perfer to be protected by an intelligent machine than an intelligent human simply because machines are less likely to make a mistake than a human being is. Only one person is smarter than a machine: the creator.\n\nIn conclusion, a driverless car is more safe and functionable than a car operated by a person. A driverless car easily stop and accelerate a car for a person who is in capable, and potentially save their life from a crash between them and someone else. A machine driven car has a better chance of keeping the driver, passenger, and pedestrian alive if they are in potentially harm. Overall, a person who has the choice between a driverless car and a non driverless car in the future should choose the safe route: a driverless car.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I strongly believe that the use the Facial Action Coding System in a classroom can be very valuable to a students education. I believe that students often get bored very easily and as a student if a lession is making you bored then you are more likely to not learn anything and not be able to recall any of the information obtained.\n\nIn school on an average day a student can have about 7 clases where in each class he or she is learning something new every single day,and that doesn't include the days when there is a lot more information to learn than normal. As a student you're taught daily and expected to remember and to recall all the information you've learned, sometimes more; and often it can be very overwhelming and sressful espically if you're taking notes and studying and it just isn't working.\n\nBut the only thing that can make that worse is being bored because then you have zero motivation to actually learn anything or to even try; which can make an already rough school day ten times more stressful and difficult. If you're so bored that you fall asleep then that is even worse because instead of being able to recall even the slightes bit of information you can't recall anything.\n\nNow if a computer saw you were bored and spiced up the lession so make it more intresting well that is a different story. If you're throughly entertained and interested then you are able to learn and recall so much more information because you were actually paying attention and maybe even having fun while learning! It opens so many doors for new possibilities from a bland boring history lession to a history lession that has you begging for so much more intresting informations making tests and assignments so much easier simply because you were entertained while learning the lession.\n\nI strongly believe that the Facial Action Coding system should be implimitted into classrooms all across America and even the world. It takes a tough task and simplifies it and makes it entertaining.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Persuading a person involves tons of effort and time. You have to know your facts and have tons of background knowlege on the subject. Do you personally believe in aliens?\n\nThe so called \"face\" provided in the image is what I believe a natural landform, although some peoples thoughts differ. If you look at the image that was revealed by NASA you will see there are no realistic features to it. Do you ever come across a person with a square or retangular head? Well, I have not.\n\nAliens aren't realistic. The presents of aliens are said to be there, but realisitcally have you ever personally came across a alien or even evidence to a aliens presents?\n\nAs we come to unmask the face on Mars the gravitational pull has formed the \"face\" on Mars by waste build up. Aliens are fictional creatures that live in movies and tv shows, not in the real world. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I believe that there are some ups and some downs to the development of making these computerized cars, because Like the article saysif there was an accident, then whose fault would it be. The article also says that why would anyone want a driveless car, but they still have to drive. This makes no sense because if you have a driveless car, then you shouldn't have to still drive.\n\nHaving a driveless car, should mean that no matter what all you should have to do is sit the the car, and just be driven where it is that you want to go. Even though the assist is very helpful, having a driveless car is a little to much. It seems as though you would have to put more time into worrying about if your going to have to drive now, or in the next five minutes. That's a lot of stress. Having a driveless car would use more fuel than just calling a taxi cab.\n\nIt doesn't make sense that the drive should have to drive half of the way and then the car just takes over. There are some perks to having a car that can drive itself, but then again say you just got off of work, your tired ok yes, you\n\ncan let the car drive, but what if the car doesn't want to drive anymore, then you have to come out of your comfortable spot and drive. This is not right, we should just keep the cars that we have now. It seems like they are a lot less trouble, and they get you where you need to go in the time that you need to be there in. There was really no point in making the driveless car, if you still have to do everything that you have to do, when your just\n\ndriving yourself.\n\nDriveless cars are very dangerous, because you don't know when you might get into an accident, and then you have a car driving you. You never know when the car's parts might stop working, and it doesn't tell you that you have roadblock up ahead, or that you may have to come to a sudden stop. The idea of having a driveless car, is a good idea, even you though you may have to do everything that you would have to do if\n\nyou are driving the car.\n\nI believe that having a driveless car is very dangerous, it's not alwayts going to be reliable, and you can hurt yourself with this car. It's assist can stop working. It may give up on you one day. The down fall about having\n\na selfdriving car too, is that no matter if you have an accident or not, it still may\n\nbecome said to be your fault. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The planet venus is kinda like a extra star in our soler system, in the article it says it's \"sometimes called a Evening Star\" and it also said that \"venus is a planet\" and it is the second planet from the sun it's a good pursuit.\n\nThe people of start to work on spacecraft so they can see what is out there and the first place they went to was the moon then mars and now venus in the article it says \"A thick atmosphere of almost 97 percent carbon dioxide blankets Venus\" and the article also says that the challenging part is the clouds of highly corrosive sulfuric acid in Venus's atmosphere so for the people that want to pursuit the planet venus it would be a good idea to look for information online or ask for information from any space programs that might be happening near you or if that doesn't help you ask people that work with stars planets and constlation at the planetarium. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Everybody may be have different opinion for everything,including the emotional expressions. When we at happy time to see that could be a smile photo. When we at med time to see that could be a angry photo and so on. We can not actually know what is the real expression from this painting. But computer can help us to recognize the subtle facial movements.\n\nOne reason is''Dr. Huang relies on the work of psychologists,such as Dr. Paul Eckman, creator of FACS (Facial Action Coding System).Eckman has classified six bisic emotions--happiness,surprise,anger,disgust,fear,and sadness--and then associated each with characteristic movements of the facial muscles.''There have six bisic emotions on computer can help us to recognize the subtle facial movements. Another reason is ''A classroom computer recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,'' Dr. Huang predicts. So that evidenced computer can recognize the emotional expressions of the students in the classroom is valuable.\n\nBy the way,people recognize the emotional expressions depented on themself at what time to see the expressions,but computers can ''calculater''that for sure. In my opinion, computer can help us to recognize the emotional expressions. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Face on mars is a natural landform on mars and it wasn't made. The \"Face\" is just there and wasn't creted to shrine anyone or some kind of special species. The Face was a landform that doesn't just appear on Mars. The Face detail has also been seen in the American West by humans. There is a chance that this is just a natural landform.\n\nThe Face is a natural landform. According to the JPL Website, \"Revealing ... a\n\nnatural landform. There was no alien monument after all.\" There is just a landform that happens to look similar to a face that someone revealed on Mars. There are still theories that people think that there are signs of a un-human like species living on Mars, but this landform was not created my aliens.\n\nAliens might have a chance of having a life of survival on Mars. But, that hasn't been proven. The Face on mars is natural and wasn't created.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "There was no technology back when the Mona Lisa was made. They had pictures and the picture showed emotion. There are some people that can see the emotions of people and some are herd to see then others. They are making technology to read the emotional expressions and that it knowns when your lieing. There are pictures that show emotion, people that see other peoples emotion, and now there making technology that reads emotional expressions.\n\nFirst, of there are pictures of people and there always will be. In those pictures you can see someones emotion and how someone is feeling. Back then they only had pictures to see. From theose pictures most artist and people could see peoples emotions, but it was meanly the artist that could read someones emotion. The artist could see throw someones fake smile or if it was real. That's why there pictures showed how many emotion she had.\n\nNext, there are some people that can read others emotion and for it's hard or they can see them. Everybody is different most people that read somebody's emotion is because there a love one or a every good friend and they can read your emotion. There is just other people that don't care. Most people should be able to see if your angry, sad or happy. Those emotions are easy to see, kids show it all the time even when there not feeling so good.\n\nFinaly, there is technology being made that reads someones emotion. The technology even know's when it is a lie. So somebody can just take a picture of somebody and there emotion. There is going to be a person that lie's the technology. Technology isn't going to make you feel better. That person is going to need a love one or a close friend, to help them out.\n\nThere always going to be somebody close by that will help you out. Could be throw a picture and that could help you. Or a friends that sees you happy, sad, or mad. The technology might tell them there emotion, but wont help them out. There are pictures that show emotion, people that see other peoples emotion, and now there making technology that reads peoples emotional expressions. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are a thing of the future, we all knew it was eventually going to happen, as technology advances, why would cars not? As time as went on cars have continually gotten safer, gotten more stylish, even came with cooler features such as back-up cameras, high tech radios, seat warmers, and even something everyone takes for granted, windows that you do not have to manually crank down.The new fad people are talking about now is driverless cars... how can you have a driverless car you wonder? Driverless cars are cars that can do things like drive and steer on their own because of programming. Is that even safe? That is the newest question regarding driverless cars. People do not know whether to get excited about driverless cars or worry more about their young teenagers driving on the streets with basically robots. Driverless cars seem like they would be such a good idea, I mean the future is approaching, people want bigger and better things.\n\nPersonally, I do not believe driverless cars sound safe and would not want to drive one myself. I do not find joy in driving at all, in fact I find it quite boring and not sure why everyone enjoys it. If I find driving, and doing the actual task boring, why would I just want to let some machine do it for me? I still have to pay attention to the road and keep my hands on the wheel, but I would just be overseeing someone elses driving. If i wanted to do that, I would probably just want to sit in the passenger seat, at least then I do not have to full fledge focus on the road. \"This means the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation recquires.\" (Paragraph 7) At that point, you might as well just drive yourself because they are always doing roadwork or their is a wreck, so just how handy would driverless driving be? In paragraph 7 it states several times and ideas of plans to make the driving not boring but very safe, how could that be safe when you are sitting in the front seat watching a display of something. I think that would just put me straight to sleep in the front seat.\n\nPeople are not that bright at all times so who is to say some drunk person can not go climbing into their car thinking since they are not the actual ones driving, it is okay. \"using cameras to watch that drivers are remaining focused on the road. While the driver watches the road, the car watches the driver.\" (Paragraph 7) I do not think that will work at all, what if a driver pulls out in front of you, how will your car handle that. Will it just keep going or will is slam on the breaks like an actual human would, or could it even tell that car pulled out in front of you? The article states \"sensors had become more advanced to detect and respond to the danger of out-of-control skids or rollovers.\" (Paragraph 5) but, that does not mean they can sense everything. \"California, Nevada, Florida, and the District of Columbia\" (Paragraph 9), are the only states that really are leading in trying driverless cars. In most states, it is illegal, and it is not illegal just because the lawmakers want to be stubborn, it is illegal for very valid reasons, and safety is the main concern in this situation.\n\nOverall, I do not support the thought of driverless cars. It seems way too dangerous for me, and not only that but, how boring does that even sound. Driveless cars may be up and coming and other people might really support them but, I do not suppport them whatsoever. This generation relies way to much on technology that it is almost sickening, we have to learn how to do things on our own and the younger generations may not ever know how to. As a teenager, I have all the social media sites, and I mean that's how people communicate anymore, but just like all the different sites, driverless cars are not necessary. I think car companies can find a lot more things to do with alll the money they make from the public that would be a lot more beneficial than making cars that drive themselves. As a highschooler, what everyone looks forward to is the day they turn sixteen and are finally able to get their license so mom and dad do not have to take them everywhere. Who is to say now that cars can drive themselves, they will not lower the age again. Therefore, I am completely against driverless cars in more than one way.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The techology called the Facial Action Coding System enables computers to identify human emotion is making Mona Lisa Smile.\n\nMaking Mona Lisa Smile is made for computer imagery, when making of Mona Lisa Smile, The students are finding the \"computer construcs a 3-D computer model of the face.\" the model of the computer move like the human muscles. Also the computer are smart as the human as, and computer tells the true. when the student's finding how is becoming to found the computer 3-D. they sloved the model and the founded. And useful in the world.. when you use 3-D model is look real life you seeing. Is beautiful to look at the imagine on the comuputer or video imagery.\n\nBody of 2, Because the computer useful and how can the computer must do it well. The computer knows your feel happy or feel sad. for example, when the proson did bad things, the police offcial used the computer and they will find you on the computer imagine. And the computer can being to ceek your bones; also the computer are so smart. it will knews everthing; for example, when people's visit the other counrtys, at the ariport when before you going throught, it might have like gate. the gate are put in computer, when you go throught that gate the computer cheek your bodys and inside of your bones; and it'll cheek your bags.\n\nbody of 3,for example, When you have eyes problem,the first they took the picture, on computer, your imagine will shows up your eyes problem; and the doctor will cheek your eyes with computer. The computer's would know how your eyes will gonna work and how much far you sees; or you need glass, it'll shows on the imagine computer.\n\nwhen you eyes cheeks would lay dawn your chin and you look at the green light and everythings the computer know about your eyes. for example, When people went to takephotos store, with their family to take family picture. After they took family picture; the carmerman ask about Adding the photos. And their family choces background, a beautiful picture, and the camerman add imagine on the computer. For the other example, when the US soldier's to fight war with Isis, before US Army's will fight their bad guys US Army's used small ariplan it have carmer, the Army's look at the place on the computer. After they look at on the computer, the Army's knews how many Isis people are there. And US captian let's go his soldier. to fight bad guys..\n\nincodue, The emotional computer class are work well. And helpful, useful and the computer will protect the country's or population. the computer are useful in everything.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" presents both positive and negative feedback about the information it gives, in my opinion I think driverless cars are okay. With this being said there's many reason as to why. Some of those reasons being they make you want to be more alert, they have newer technology in them, and built them to make them more modern.\n\nAs I stated above, a reason like these cars make you more alert. Meaning they make you more aware of your surroundings. In the article it says, \"Google's modified Toyota Prius uses position-estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the review mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS reciever and an internal motion sensor.\" This makes a person very cautious about their surroundings. Also, it states in the article that \"GM has developed driver's seats that vibrate when a problem occurs.\" The driver is notified when an accident is going to occur or when it has hit anything. Safety is always a big concern.\n\nAnother reason is all the technology built into the car. It makes it more modern and catches many eyes. Technology is where the world is going. Technology plays a huge role in all our lifestlyes now. Many of these driverless cars aren't exactly \"driverless\" but they act as they are. There's more GPS devices built in that repeat directions to you, talking on-star, and it also states that \"manufacturers are also considering using cameras to watch that drivers are remaining focused on the road.\" Which brings us back to safety. Always a concern.\n\nEven though driverless cars aren't really all that great. They still make the most in trying to keep many people safe. There's been a time where it's costed more money to invest in a smarter road for these cars. But if the world is being brought to more technology, more money is going to have to be spent on things that are needed. Companies have to start improving their cars are some point.\n\nI'm more for driverless cars than I am against them. Safety is a big concern in everyones life. As well as technology plays a large part too. Driverless cars have everything and will have everything to keep the driver alert and aware of what they are around. There's many other things that you can do with technology to improve on a car. Which just makes it a whole lot better for the driver and their owner's companies. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Facial Action Coding System is a new technology that helps know the emotions the person is feeling. This new technology can even identify emotions from a painting as old as Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa. This technology can also identify when there are mix emotions and when one is faking or lying about it. It all happens by how the muscles of our face move which show a specific emotion or more. The Facial Action Coding System is indeed very valuable because it could help a speaker's performance, performance in the arts, and to know the truth.\n\nThis new technology could help a speaker's performance by knowing how he is doing. If the speaker is reading off a long paragraph and the listeners are \"paying attention\" but in reality are thinking about something else then the speaker would know. He would then be able to involve the listeners in his speech, make eye contact or do whatever to get thier attention back. This could benefit teachers in a daily lesson to know how good or bad they are doing at explaining things. It could help when preparing for the end of the semester test and then the teacher would know what to focus on. This could also help when student's are giving speeches infront of the class. They would be able to know if they are doing a good job or not and how to do better in their speech to get a better grade.\n\nIn theater you have to act as a different person and you have to get into there position in whatever situation they are in. You can't just read the lines and expect people to enjoy the play. You have to be sad when your best friend died or scared when some is chasing after you. All of these are emotions that the teacher would expect performers to perform. This is why the Facial Action Coding System would be valuable to better the perfomance in arts. In paragraph 9 the author states \"moving your facial muscles not only expresses emotions, but also may even help produce them.\" This means that the new technology can make those fake emotions into more realistic for actors who need to seem like they are actually scared, sad, worried or feeling any other emotion.\n\nFurthermore in paragraph 8 it says \"these muscle clues are sometimes used to spot when a \"smiling\" politician or celebrity isn't being truthful.\" This means that the new technology could help know if the emotions public people are showing is actually truthful or not. If they are faking to be sad about something tragic but in reality they aren't then that would show everyone who they really are. Even though this is invading people's personal opinion and space, it would help to know the truth. This could also cause problems in the world of politics but it's better to be honest than to lie. Everyone deserves to know the truth about politics and what they really think so it would not hurt to know the very truth.\n\nDon't you think that it's better to be honest with yourself and everyone else then faking things? This new technology Facial Action Coding System would helping with that. It could help a speaker's performance by knowing if they are explaining it right. It could help in acting an emotion different from what they are truly feeling. Lastly, it could help with knowing the whole truth about politicians and there way of showing they think about certain things. These are only three reasons why this new technology would be valuable. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I'm against driveless development beccuse when it's snowing outside and you have to walk to school with no buses. mom and dad has to work,live a mile away. Or when your a senior in high school what's the point of doing drivers ed to drive. What if you get a job you far from there how are you going to get to work everyday on time so you want lose your job. If your grandma have to go to the doctor to old to ride the bus hows going to take her for life support. Some one in your family is having a baby and you call 911 they don't get there in time and you don't know how to deliver a baby the what.\n\nAnyone have a stroke in your family 911 doesn't t come in time chance the person dies cause you didn't have a car to save him or her. People need cars for important thing in life with out cars the whole world will be walking there whole life. If you don't like to ride plans,trains,or riding a crowed bus for hours or days you use a car navigaion has short cuts to get there faster. If there wasn't for cars there will be no intertament in the world. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "97% carbon dioxide blankets venus. the planets surface tempatures average over 800 degrees in farenheit.\n\nvenus has the hottest surface tempature of any other planet that is in the solar system. venus has a suraface rocky and sediment and includes familular features just like earth such as things like valleys mountains and also craters. i think they are gonna try to find a way to study it more and alot closer without dying. many researchers been working on innovations that would allow machines to last long to contribute\n\nto the knowlage of venus so they can find out more about the planet in a safer way. i think that they will meet the challenge faster if they use the machine instead of sending people up there because itbwould last longer and give them alot more time. the reasearchers cant take samples like rock or gas or anything from a distance. they would need to go up but in a more safer way. they could make the challenge if they keep trying and are careful. from far above the planet it can only provide limited insight on ground conditions alot of forms of light cant penetrate the dense atmosphere. they mustuve already tried to do that.they will probably start using devices or machines for the rest of the studdying of venus beacause in this passage they were talking alot about devices and what they could be used for and how putting a machine up on the plannet would last longer so they can get more knowlege. i think that they will most likley meet their goal. even though there may be some dangerous and doubts and less expectations. venus is closest to the sun. venus is reffered to as the earths twin. i think sciencetists want to keep finding out stuff about this planet beacause they think its somewhat like the earth. they said they belive it has some of the same features such ass rocks mountains and valleys. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "When I was told if I wanted to be on the Seagoing Cowboys trip across the Atlantic, I knew I couldn't pass an opportunity like this. I have been dreaming that I would be asked to go on the trip and it finally happened. I wonder if they chose other people to go along the trip as well, but I was to excited to even think who was going because I knew that I would be going on the trip overseas.\n\nDon Reist, my friend, was the one who asked me to go with him overseas. He said that we will import animals along with food so the animals don't starve to death. I asked him if anyone else was going and he said no. Well I suddenly started yelling at him and told him many people dream of his job and he should not only invite friends, but to invite other people who don't get these type of chances. He suddenly got freaked out and he said that he would go around town and ask people to join us on our trip to the countries that were dept from war.\n\nI'm not sure if people will accept because it was right after war was over, what if they go off and realized there is an enemy of the United States and realized we are from there and they suddenly start shooting us. Yeah, maybe I shouldn't bring that idea up. But why WOULD they kill us? We are here to save them from starvation and dept and they'll be getting their gun, shooting us? Yeah, nothing bad is going to happen, except for the ocean storms that will be caused and the mighty waves will sweep us away like a broom sweeping away the dust. And again, another idea I shouldn't bring up so people can actually join. We don't want them to reject, because honestly, I don't want me and Don Reist to go alone!!! Wait, there are more recruiters, right???\n\nThis was an opportunity of a lifetime, why would people let it pass and decide not to go? Is it because they don't like animals, or because they get seasick, or is it because they are worried they will get shot by enemies of the United States????? Nope, it was because they don't want to leave Mommy and Daddy!!! I don't care about my Mom and Dad, because mostly I get in trouble by them. 99% of my injuries are from them, and I blackedout twice when Mom gave me a pot to head and almost killed me. Mostly caused me a concussion. But anyways, people should see how beautiful traveling the world is, because many people don't get these types of opportunities. Reasons to join is because this is once-in-a-lifetime chance, people don't let these go by. You can have fun and enjoy the trip. Most important of all, IT IS FREE!!!!! So join the program, be inspired to help countries in ruins. You got everything in the world but these people don't, so make sure they get what is needed to make this world a happy place.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Hey, have you ever wanted to go sight seeing?\n\nwell you can now if you make the best choice by participating in The Seagoing Cowboys program it will take you to very wonderful and unique places. It allowed me experience adventures that I've have enjoyed and I hope you will to. Once you join the program\n\nWhen I first graduted high school I worked two part time jobs. I worked at a bank and a grocery store. Then my friend Don reist asked me if I wanted to go to Europe on a cattle boat. I couldn't say no this was an opportunity of a lifetime.\n\nThe time was 1945 world war II was over. It left a lot of countries in it worst time. I decided to help these people. First we recovered their food supplies, animals, and anything else they needed. Then 44 nations joined together and made the UNRRA aka The United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation. THey hired \"Seagoing Cowboys\" of the animals that were shipped over seas Don and I signed up\n\nSo in closing if you sign up you can go see the world and help people at the same time. Who wouldn't want to do that? If you ever wanted to help people or see the world it can be very very easy. It will be the best thing that ever happend to you", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "DOES ELECTORAL COLLEGE WORK?\n\nI think is the electoral college is important that is established it in the constitution in the country . the security in the person. for good electoral gollege have much progress congressional , election and vote .no easy. the diferent person think the ideas diference through. they think easy the working realize and think delit and no just election and vote for person is going tramp and the diferent person think is no just that president have more the time stablished is incorrect other person necesity have oportunities in be elector.\n\nThe electoral college is popular for used.''Abolishing the electoral college! They're not alone; according to a Gallup poll in 2000, taken shortly after al gore-thanks to the quirks of the electoral college-won the popular vote but lost the presidency , over 60 porcent of voters would prefer a direct election to the kind we have now. the dirent argument in united states '' the single best argument against the electoral college is what we might call the disaster factor'' te united staste have diferent forms the using electoral college sometimes state conventions, sometimes the state party's central committee, sometimes the presidential candidares themselves.''the senate would choose the vice-president. the diferent senator's popular did diferences electoral college in parts of the united states. example : ''Nixon, Jimmy carter, bob Dole, the U.S camber of commerce, and the AFL-Cio all.''\n\nOne example ''republicans in california. knowing their vote will have no effect , they have less incentive to pay attention to the campaigh than they would have if the president were picked by popular vote.... but of course no voter's vote swings a national election, and in spite of that, about one-half the eligible American population did nvote in (2012)election''. In electoral consist in vote that person going is necessary much candidate for fine electoral college \" the electoral college consts of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the president.\" The electoral collage is ver important in big responsability for status.\" After the presidential election, your governor a 'certificate' of scertainment' listing all of the candidates who ran for president in your state along with the names of their respective electors.\" the responsability the electoral college is better status. the candidate is going election and promosion for going electives'' However, maine and Nebraska each have a variation of '' proprotional representation..''\n\nIn conclusion, the text electoral college is import for status. The electoral college is big method of selcting that using very good for election in candidate and president and diferent causes no required. In the electoral college requires president and candidates for diferent region. So region have president or candidate that proportion benefic and help for person much through. the united statates is country in much posibilies where using better the electoral college . where going good the through and using more democratic. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "its stupid for kids rhese days to have technology at school it doiesnt help out at all this generation is straight up lazy we took away cursive we took away books and the technology is reading for us next thing you know we are gong to have robot teachers its stupid we need to go back to what it use to be just straight up papaer and textbooks. yeah sometimes its fun to have technology everyone does but not in school look how these kids are growing uo the only thing they do is mess around and play games in class and dont do there homework and dont pay attention or getting in trouble and its ridiculous. the worse thing of all about having technology at schol is cyber bullying i mean thats easy to do download an app change your name wps address and they wont know who it is and people will say mean things to the other student might making kids comit suicide or shot up te school we need to get rid of technology in school its doing no on good besides the teachers because they're lazy and just want to type a number in the computer and put it in the grade book i mean thats my opinin ik alot of people dont agree with me but schools all around the united states of america needs to get rid of these ipads and chromebooks and macbooks for the schools and even the elementreys have them thats just a new lazy generation coming and thats how its going to be no morw jobs for the new generation well by then you will be able to work from home but still technology is bad for schools in this society", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "As crazy as living without a car sounds, more and more people are doing it. One popular reason for it is for a healthier and happier lifestyle. In Elisabeth Rosenthal's short story titled In\n\nGerman Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars\n\nHeidrun Walter reports \"When I had a car I was always tense. I'm much happier this way.\" Her and many others like her in the town of Vauban, Germany have experienced the difference and felt stress go away. The city has banned driveways and home garages, encourging the rule of living \"car-free.\" The people rely on public transit, bicycles and their own two legs. While many people are stressing to get a car, the people of the town feel stressed if they have a car. Over half the population sold their cars to move there, and don't regret a thing. In the article titled\n\nCar-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota , Andrew Selsky quotes Carlos Arturo Plaza as saying \"It's a good oppurtunity to take away stress\" as he rode a two-seat bicycle with his wife.\n\nAlso Carlos Arturo Plaza goes on to say \"[it's a good oppurtinity to] lower air pollution.\" People are realizing how many pollutants that cars emitt into the atmosphere. One example place is Paris, known for their terrible smog, has finally done something to clean it up. Robert Duffer wrote in\n\nParis bans driving due to smog\n\n\"After days of near-record pollution, Paris enforced a partial driving ban to clear the air of the global city.\" The law stated even numbered license plates couldn't drive one day, and the other, odd liscense plates couldn't. A little thing like this had a big effect. Duffer then reported \"Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France, after five-days of intensifying smog.\" Elizabeth Rosenthal in the aritcle\n\nThe End of Car Culture showed the idea \" if [these] patterns persists...it will have beneficial implications for carbon emissions and the environment, since transportation is the second largest source of America's emissions.\" Americans are partically to blame for pollution. Our need for the newest, biggest, best things, has come at a cost, and more than money. Green-house gases are stacking up, and we have to take a stand some time. Rosenthal goes on to describe political leaders are working to fix this too, \"President Obama's abitious goals to curb the United States' greenhouse gas emissions [were] unveiled last week.\"\n\nIn places already practicing the no car rule, environments have improved; more than pollution wise. Andrew Selsky reported of \"the construction of 118 miles of bicycle paths\" and \"uneven, pitted sidewalks have been replaced by broad, smooth sidewalks.\" These two additions of Bogota, Colombia have inspired many people to turn in their keys, and take a hike instead. Not only have these changes made people more happy, but it makes their city more beautiful and they are starting to get outdoors and see it. The author reports that \"municipal authorities from other countries came to Bogota to see the event [car-free day] and were enthuriastic,\" amung the people visiting was the Mayor of Paraguay's capital city. When more people see the effects, they want to do the same thing. Columbia's one day event has brought about much talk in neighboring towns and even \"two other Colombian cities, Calli and Valledupar, joined the event.\"\n\nOn the other side of the argument, many car industries are trying to compete with these new ideas and technology. Rosenthal quotes in\n\nThe End Of Car Culture\n\n\"But it could have negative implications for the car industry. Indeed, companies like Ford and Mercedes are already rebranding themselves \"mobility\" companies with broader product range beyond the personal vehicle\" As humans advance into the ideas of walking, biking, or taking public transportation, car companies strive to become known for things other than cars. They want to be able to sell you things still, even if you don't want or need a car. Later she writes how Bill Ford proposed the fresh idea at the Mobile World Congress that car dealers should \"partner with the telecommunications industry to create cities in which 'pedestrian, bicycle, private cars, commercial and public transportation traffic are woven into a connected network to save time, conserve resources, lower emissions and improve safety.\" This long quote simply means having all forms of transportion and the new technology in communications to be one, for the better of the people.\n\nWith or without cars, we all are always on the move. Some cities have adapted new ideas to get from place to place, or simply old ideas, being put back into action. Although Henry Ford would probably be dissapointed at his invention being faded out, Mother Nature would be pleased of us taking care of Earth. We never know what the future holds, but we do know, we'll always only have one home, so we better take care of it. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are not a good or safe choice for drivers. There are many negative aspects of the idea of these types of cars. They are more expensive, less enjoyable for drivers, can't self operate in all conditions and the driver is unaware of when they will need to take over. Also, they are not rendered completely safe and new laws would need to be passed for people to be able to operate them. In the event of an accident, the idea of who would have to claim responsibility is uncertain. The probability of an accident happening due to technology glitching would be quite high. These cars would be a bad idea because they pose a big threat.\n\nTo begin, driverless cars would be more expensive for everyone. The manufacturers would have to splurge and spend much more money on specific parts for the driverless cars. Engineers at Berkely designed a car that read positive and negative polarity as messages in binary code, which required a smart road system that worked very well, \"but they required upgrades to existing roads, something that was simply too expensive to be practical.\" (paragraph 3) This tells us that the engineers had a good idea, but lots of roads would've needed renovations that were far too expensive. Next, driverless cars would be less enjoyable for drivers. \"Why would anyone want a driverless car that still needs a driver? Wouldn't drivers get bored waiting for their turn to drive?\" (paragraph 8) It wouldn't be fun sitting and doing nothing in the driver's seat when you aren't the one driving. Drivers would need to be alert at all times due to another negative aspect mentioned earlier: the driver is unaware as to when they will need to take over. \"...the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires. This necessitates the car being ready to quickly get the driver's attention whenever a problem occurs.\" (paragraph 7) The drivers must keep their eyes on road and devote their 100% attention to driving even while the car is doing the braking, steering and accelerations itself. Driverless cars also cannot drive in all conditions. \"...all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigation through work zones and around accidents.\" (paragraph 7) Drivers are never really free of driving, so purchasing a car that is said to be driverless for the purpose of not having to drive is pointless. Drivers have to drive themselves through things like constuction or accident sites.\n\nFurthermore, driverless vehicles are not legally rendered completely safe. \"...traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times.\" (paragraph 9) This proves that driverless cars legally cannot be considered safe because the human behind the wheel is not in control at all times. The car itself would be in control presumably for the majority of the time alloted for driving, so by law it isn't considered safe. With that being said, new laws would need to be passed in order for the driverless cars to be tested/driven. \"Still even if traffic laws change, new laws will be needed in order to cover liability in the case of an accident.\" (paragraph 9) This directly tells us that new laws wouild need to be passed before people could legally own and operate driverless vehicles. This leads into the next idea: the responsibility of an accident involving a driverless car would be hard for one to claim. \"If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the manufacturer?\" (paragraph 9) Since the driver is supposed to remain alert and be ready to jump in when the car can't handle a certain situation, who should take the blame for an accident? The car for the technology failing or the human for not taking over before the accident occured?\n\nIn conclusion, driverless vehicles would not be a good idea. Testing them in controlled environments where humans being put into danger isn't a factor would be okay, but for recreational use only. These cars would be more expensive, can't drive in all conditions, are less fun for drivers, and not rendered completely safe. The drivers wouldn't know when they would need to take over until right when they're needed to, new laws would need to be passed for them and the responsibility of an accident would be uncertain. Overall, these driverless cars are just a bad idea and pose a big threat to humans because the probability of an accident happening would be more likely, especially since the technology could glitch easier and faster than a human could mess up on the road and cause an accident.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Most people are looking towards Mars as humans next home. But we still could form a civilisation on Venus.This article will show you how Venus is also an option in the next step of space travel.\n\nThe author of this article supportied his clam that Venus is worth pursuit despite the dangers of the planet. He states in the text,\" NASA has one particularly compelling idea for sending humans to study Venus.\"Also it states in the text,\" Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life ,just like Earth.\" the athor says that NASA has wanted to send more drones but they only last a few hours do to weather condisions on the planet.That is how the arthor supported his clam that\n\nVenus is a worhty pursuit despite the dangers.\n\nSo in conclusion this article shows that even though there is dangers to be at hand Venus is still an option for exploration.Also it shows that NASA still want to see if Venus was once like Earth.That also shows how close we are to Venus rather than Mars in distances.So further more The article states that our sister planet is also a good option for research and also to explore the planet a bit further than we have in the past. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I have a single thought about the driverless car. I look forward to the driverless car being an actual car in which we can buy ourselves. Although this may be an amazing invention, and quite possibly helpful, it still has some bad things to the invention. However, these problems are very small and ineffective problems. I see the driverless car being a major success.\n\nAs I said, I look forward to seeing this car in the future. It may take a while for an actualy driverless car to be announced and released, I still see it as a successful future invention. This car could be very helpful to us in multiple ways. One main and very important factor that this car could prevent is the amount of accidents per year. As said in the passage, safety is the main concern. Although we plan to make driverless cars, I'm pretty sure that they would want to also make the car safer for the driver, other drivers, and pedestrians as well. Once they beging to make these safety concerns resolved, the car will be a major success to the world.\n\nAnother thing that is really good about the car is that it would use half the fuel of a commonly known taxi. This would be great for the world and the people living on it. Since this car would use half the fuel of a taxi today, I would assume that the amount of pollution in the air would decrease. Once the amount of pollution decreases, we could live on this planet with better air. We also wouldn't need to worry so much about destroying our ozone layer, which protects us from the suns harmful ultraviolet rays.\n\nThe idea of this invention is a great and revolutionary idea. With this car many people can now travel more safely and more effeiciently. This invention may cost quite a bit, but in the long run it would be worth it since we wouldn't need to purchase so much fuel due to its little fuel consumption. Since it has little fuel consumption, and presumebly less gas production, the air wouldn't be as polluted as it is now. I love the idea of this invention and I'm really looking forward to seeing this car on the streets in the near future. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that driverless cars would be a very positive thing. Thre big reasons for this are that without drivers there would be less aciidents, they would be more efficient wih gas, and there would be no need for insurance. So overall a big improvement on todays society.\n\nFirstly without drivers there would be less accidents. Now since since not everyone would be able to afford using them there will still be accidents butz the number will be drasticly reduced. Since the car is driving itself there is no way that the driver can drive recklessly therefore greatly reducing the number of car crashes. So even if one of the drriverless cars gets into an accident it would be the manufacturer's fault because they are the ones hat are really driving here. So overall a lot safer than what we have now.\n\nMy next reason is that these cars a lot more gas efficient. The reason I say this is that they would always obey the speed limit exactly. Doing this should cut down on the gas used and therefore be much more efficient. In the long run this sabes everyone money except the gas stations.\n\nLastly this should decrease the need for insurance. In the article they said that these would be more like a taxi service so if they are taxi than no need for people to have insurance on cars. If everyone used these than no more need for car insurance at all. Which in turn saves even more money for people. So overall very good cost wise for people.\n\nSo these driverless cars will be a very positive thing. They will reduce car crashes, be more gas efficient, and decrease the need for insurance. In conclusion these cars will be awesome.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author in \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" presents both positive and negative aspects of driverless cars. I think that car manufacturers should be able to be on the streets more. Some examples are that they let out less CO2 and they use less gas to save you more money.\n\nOne example is that the driverless cars are safer than non driverless cars. Most of the people will agree that driveless cars are safer than people that are driving because they aren't focused on the road. They are more foucused on what is happing on their phones or watching what is happing around them instead o what is going on in frount of them. In the article it says that driverless cars have gone millions of miles without a single crash. While everyday people are crashing and killing other people because they care about what is going on their phone than what is going on the road. Sure they still will crash into other cars but with these cars but it will be less then what it is right now with people driving.\n\nThe second thing that makes driverless cars better is that they don't use that much gas and it'll help earth. Instead of paying like 50 dollars you will just have to pay 25 dollars to fill up your gas tank at the pump. You will start saving hundreds of dollars in just a year for chaniging to a driverless car and not only that it will also help on the place we live on. The cars we use now produces a lot of CO2 and that CO2 is hurting us but if we switch now we can change the world we live in by having less CO2 in the air.\n\nAnother way that driverless cars are better is that when you go on a long trip you get tired and feel like resting for a little bit. Well now you can, you'll be able to get on your phone and talk to someone or you could just lay back and see a movie that you have been meaning to see but just haven't had enough time to. You'll be able to do that and if something is going on around you the car's sensors will pick it up and tell you what you need to do. It would be a win-win thing case you get to do what you want to do and the car will take you where you need to go and it'll inform you if it needs you help to do something.\n\nThose are some few exampels that shows us why we need to have driverless cars on the streets. So far it looks like the future is looking good for driverless cars for helping us be safe on the roads and saving us time and money. Its just a matter of time that we'll see everyone with driverless cars. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Many people think that there are faces on Cydonia. Some people think that there is no life on Cydonia.\n\nIn 1976, 1998, and 2001 there are pictures that NASA took when they saw this face like figure on this planet called Cydonia. The spacecrafts that saw the faces were called the Viking 1 ,and Viking 2. \"When they had saw it they said it was believed that the head was nearly two miles from end to end ,and seemed like it was staring back at them.\" They thought it was like a Egyptian Pharaoh. So as this quote says those people that apparently went to Cydonia saw that face it could've been staged like the US going in to Mars. You can't believe everything you see ,or hear am i right.\n\nIt says in the text that \"The (Face on Mars) has since become a pop icon. It has starred in Hollywood films, even appeared in books ,and magazines. NASA said taht there was a conspiracy theory that people think that the Face is Bona Fide. Few scientists believed that the Face was an alien artifact. iT says that there was a (MOC) a Mars Orbiter Camera that had took the shot of what had looked like a human face on another planet. In the 1976 photo it kind of looks like a face i can see the nose, eyes ,but no mouth. In the 1998 photo i can barely see the eyes, nose ,and this time i can see a mouth. In the 2001 photo i saw eyes, nose ,but yet again no mouth. So i think that in the 1976 ,and the 2001 photo that the MOC had took a bluty picture. In the 1998 photo it looks like that MOC took a better picture ,and you can see that 1/3 of the face is kind of shiny. So, i think this might be another fake job by NASA like the moon.\n\nLike in paragraph 10 it says \"Neverless, on April 8, 2001 a cloudless summer day in Cydonia. I'm thinking that how can a camera know if another planet that apparently has human life on it know if it is a summer day. As i said before this could just be a big hoax. To get attention for NASA ,and to be popular. My opinion is that i think this is fake like most people think that the landing on the moon was fake. I mean come on MythBusters showed why they think they landing on the moon was fake. I believe them i mean with everything they showed us it could've been staged. I mean ijust because, people said that they have been on another planet ,and apparently saw a human face doesn't mean you have to believe them. The picture they showed could've been staged. For all i know even though i wasn't born yet NASA could've just got some cemit ,and drew a face for all we know. In paragraph 12 it says \"What the picture actually is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa landforms common around the American West.\" So i think that this sentence in paragraph 12 is saying that Garvin thinks that NASA's discovery of life on Cydonia is a hoax. I mean come on people you can't believe everything you see, and hear. Just because, someone says something ,and everyone else might think he/she is right don't mean you have to agree.\n\nIn conclusion i think that us as people really went up to another planet ,and saw a human face. I mean come on. Have you ever thought of how Neil Armstrong being the first man to be on the moon could've been fake. I mean, have you seen that MythBusters episode. They showed there reasons why they thing the landing on moon was fake. I happen to believe them. I mean how could there have been a light on one of the guys space helmet there is no light on there. The light could've been from a stage light. I mean if this was real why did'n't they take it ,and research it. For all we know in those pictures there looked like there was no brain ,no facial expressions ,and no features. So, my opinion i think that this is another hoax by NASA good night Istep. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "We discovered the face on mars twenty-five years ago and since then we have not uncovered anything that tells us there are alien life forms living on the planet. Is it still possible for there to be aliens on the planet, maybe. We could go back to the planet and see if there is any evidence of alien life forms now.\n\nThe face on Mars is formed from wind blowing dirt and sand around, pileing it up and packing it together. Now it just so happened that it managed to form a face with eyes, a nose, and a mouth. Now is this a strnge thing to have happen, yes it is indeed but it still happened all on its own. If we were to go and look at the photots you would see that there are no footprints or anything aroun the face, there is just the face.\n\nUnless the alien life forms are living beneath the planet there are no aliens. Is it possible for aliens to be living underneath the ground of the planet, yes it is possible. For all we know there could be aliens living underneath the crust of our planet. We do have yet to discover everything but for now we will assume that there are no alien life forms living in this galaxy, maybe in another galaxy but not this one.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The mission to Venus is one that has been on a consent want and need for men and women but due to Venus challenging surface and atmoshphere, it causes many set backs for NASA but they dont allow that to stop them. In the text it claims that, \" While Venus is simple to see from the distand but safe vantage point on earth, it has proved a very challenging place to examine more closely\" (Challenge 1). It's possible to see Venus from Earth and enjoy the beauty as it comes, but many others want a closer look of the beauty and dangers of Venus. NASA calls them missions and this is where the most results of a planet come to piece together the study. It's clear that missions are dangerous but, \"Each previous mission was unmanned, and for good reason, since no spacecraft survived the landing for more than a few hours\" (Challenge 2). Sending unmanned spacecraft before actual people is there way is studying without harming the people that are willing to risk a lot.\n\nEarth and Venus are two planets that are very interesting due to their layouts and the features and each one holds, each planet may have things that we won't know until we discover them. In the passage it explains what Venus is to us, shown\n\nhere, \"Often referred to as Earth's 'twin,' Venus is the clost planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occasionally the closest in distance too\" (Challenge 2). This may seem like great news the two planets are alike and are close together but understanding a planet that has never seen people is hard. Not only that huamns have never stepped foot on the planet but the overall income it may take to build a spacecraft, only for it to last couple of hours on the planet. Many issues come to the surface when taking about sending a spacecraft to Venus most often it's, \"Numerous factors contribute to Venus's repution as a challening planet for humans to study, despite it's proximity to us\" (Challenge 2). After counting up the possible outcome of a mission to Venus, it's always a outcome very little information and the need for more. This make NASA went to explore a planet that is so close but has countless dangers.\n\nThe dangers of one planet similar to the planet that many people live on would be far fetched until meeting Venus. That means the yes Earth and Venus may be twins but ones not like the other. Earth is a place of great colors and has a sence of beauty until looked upon by Venus, shown in the text that, \"Such an environment would crash even a submarine accustomed to driving to the deepest parts of our oceans and would liquefy many metals\" (Challenge 3). When saying that Earth and Venus are twins, it can be seen more as Venus is the evil twin and doesn't mean to but just is. Venus is a present waiting to be open, it's a like present because it's never known what's in store for the person or persons opening it. The text explains that \"Venusian geology and wather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, frequent lighting strikes to probes seeking to lond on it's surface\" (challenge 3). The climate of Venus isn't a remake of Earth it's clear that it's hold a lot more dangers to the study of the planet. Also Earth shares those dangers but not at the scale that Vensu might.\n\nAlthough Venus is dangerous up close Astronomers are still looking for answers and enlightment on the planet. The reasons for them still wanting figure out this planet is due to, \"Venus probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like those on Earth\" (challenge 4). At one point Venus have have been a on point twin capable on inhabiting lifeforms to live out thier days. Now Venus seems like it's been in a bad mood due to the change. since the overrall climate of Venus giving many scientist a hard time with the study of the planet shown in the text, \"Researchers cannot take samples of rock, gas, or anything else, from distance\" (Challenge 6). The consent change in weather and how it already is makes it hard for researchers to reach the surface to gather information. Leaving the scientists in a tough spot and not being able to do much other than just look and admire.\n\nScientists are not willing to tap out and say game over, they are determind to unfold the secrets of Venus and the hidden life that it may or may not take care of without anyone knowing, Scientists are hard at work with, \"Some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulationg the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted for three weeks in such conditions\" (Challenge 7). They made a carbide that would be able to withstand the climate and treats that Venus throws that it, this could help with the resreach. There is a meaning behind travel to Venus and it's clear that many want this. Shown in the text that \" Striving to meet the challenge presented by Venus has value, not only because of the insighted to be gained on the planet itself\" (Challenge 8). It means a lot to people that if this was capable of doing they would be helping with it because it would help further the span of life for many humans. Venus is a planet much like ours, it may hold some differeance but in the end it's clear to see that every planet does. No doubt that the dangers of space are anywhere and everywhere no matter where the mission is taking place but it's the bigger picture that matters.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the making of mona lisa they had cpmputers tthey was using to create it. They haad a emotion calculater to caculate the emotions. Mona lisa was 83 percent happy, 9percent disgusted, 6 percent fearmful and 2 percent angry. The ideaof the emotion coculater was made by drpaul eckman. Dr. Paul decided to name the idea FACS which stanmds for facial actions coding system.\n\nIt al began constructsa 3-D computer model of the face, all the forty-four must work like human muscles. Dr. Paul had classified six basic groups emotions happieness,suprise,anger,digust fear and sadness. in my opinion i think that this is a great invention.\n\nHuman preform the same impressions every day trough emotions. We tell our friends jow we feel or by the expression on our faces they can tell how we feel. sometimes its hard to understand or figure out how people feel. some hide there emotions better than otheres than there are more who show it eaiser.\n\nThe Mona lisa is a demontration is really intended to bring a smile to peoples faces, it also shows how muvh a computer can do. Some ad will make you happy then their are some that will make you frown. I honesthly think that tis is a really amazing idea and think that alot or people would enjoy it. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" the author uses both positve and negative aspects of driverless cars. With time, technology has advanced and helped our society in many ways. Although being able to text your friends and having new ways to treat ill patients is nice to have, you have no choice but to wonder \"Can everything be advanced to something better or is it best to stick with what we are accustomed to?\". Driverless cars should not be developed.\n\nDriverless cars can not completely drive on their own. The article states that humans behind the wheel of a driverless car must stay alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires. Drivers could forget to pay attention because they're focused on something else or even worse, fall asleep. Therefore, the idea of having a \"driverless\" car is simply not safe enough to actually be a normal form of transportation.\n\nAlong with that, legally, if an accident were to occur, there is not a side that can be faulted. An accident can easily be blamed on the manufacturers, which leads back to the question of their existence, or the driver for potentially not being aware of what was happening with their vehicle.\n\nThe fact that these cars can't one-hundred percent drive themselves make you wonder who would actually invest in them. Most would probably believe that you would be better invested in a normal car and simply driving themselves.\n\nWith this being such a controversial topic, there's no clear answer as to where funds and grants would come from. Some may be for the production of the vehicle while others may be against it because of safety issues or just the fact that the money of citizens could be used in other benificial projects.\n\nThe article informs you that some cars read positive and negative polarity as messages in binary code. Binary code is also a main factor to a computer. With that being said, just like computers, the driverless cars could possibly be hacked and lead to a different location than what was originally planned.\n\nIn conclusion, driverless cars should not be developed. Driverless don't completely drive themselves and could not only lead to accidents but also no one wanting to invest in them. They also could be hacked and lead to even bigger problems. Ideally, it is best to stick with what we are accustomed to: cars that require a full-time driver. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "According to the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" there is a new technology called the Facial Action Coding System. This inovation is a computer program that is able to read human emotions by reading a persons facial expressions and muscle movement. The new system has been able to read the emotions of the model for the mona lisa, but just\n\nbecause it can be used doesn't mean it has value. Using this program on students in a classroom is not valuable. Ultimaltley only a student can know his emotions, the best way to teach is an one on one human connection, and just because we can do something doesn't mean we should.\n\nComputers and technology are becoming the center of the world in todays soceity. They run are homes, infrustrature, economy, and just about everything. Using this new Facial Action Coding System on students could just cause more harm then good. If a student is sad, that student is going to know weather other people do or not. He would not need a computer to tell him how he is feeling. When trying to show how benefical the new program is the author said \"For instance, you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face.\" Saying this only proves that the person and even people around the person can already tell what their emotios are based on the way they look, talk, and act without any need from a computer.\n\nThe hope for this program is not only being able to read emotions, but replecating them as well. Dr. Huang predcits that they can modify the software to make learning programs. He says that \"A classroom computer could regonize when a student is becoming confused or bored. Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" As Dr. Huang points out at the end of that quote, a human reconize emotions and would be able to help that student just as well as a computer. There is no need for computer help because the best way a student is going to learn is from another human. Sometimes computers mess up or is wrong, with a teacher you can talk and discuss the problem. A computer would just tell you how you are feeling, even if it's wrong. The article asks the question \"Can we actually ca;culate emotions-like math homework? And how csn a computer recognize the subtle facial movements we humans use to express how we feel?\" It then goes on the explain the sciece behind the program, which talks the connection out of it. Humans are more complicated then just a program. The way it is explained, it is saying humans are so simple we can be read by a program. Doing this makes us seem less unique, it takes away the segnificance of human contact. Teaching a student can not just be done by a program it has to be done by another human.\n\nLife is full of opurtinites and chocies we could take and make, but sometimes we shouldn't. In the intro to the article, it explores the idea of \"Imagine being able to detect exactly how other people are feeling, even when they are trying to hide their emotions.\" A student could be having a bas day, but gives the illusion of being happy because he doesn't want anyone to know he's having a rough time. Using a computer program to determine how he is feeling is an invasion of his pravicy, almost like reding his mind. Even though techonigacally we can read someones emotions, it doesn't mean its morally right. A person's thoughts is basically the only thing kept private, and emotions is one that could be kept private. It might not stop there either. As technology advances, even more programs could be invented, that go even further thn reading emotions. There has to be a line that is drawn, and reading emotions is passed the line.\n\nMany people might be excited about the Facial Action Coding System and what it can do. Sometimes things are made that shouldn't be. The debate about wheather this is benefical to the classroom or not should be a simple decion of no. Things that can be done shouldn't always, a student can decide for himself what he is feeling, and human connection is more valueable than anything a computer can do. All in all, students do not need a computer telling their emotions to learn ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author descibes how new techology called the Facial action Coding system enables compurtures idenify human emotions. By telling and us in a art that software can tells us the emotinal and or feels on someone in a art desgin. This is really great that a computer software can tell us how happy, sad, mad,or every arger someone is off of the the way they looked in a art design.\" Eckamn has classified six basic emotions Happiness, surpise,anger, disgust,fear and sadness and then assoicated each with charcteristic movements of the facial muscles.\" In Mona Lisa art design she making really sad or even bored but with the new sysytem Eckman can make this little art something that even one would love to look at. The new system in the software computue is really upgrade its things like. Now the technogly can tell someone of any kind how the person was feeling while doing this art, Back in the 1900 centries they wasn't even able to watch tv or talk to someone unless it was though writing a letter now of days we can text or call. This is every important to social behavior cause now we can tell how the people earlier on this world has feeling about the art and how they exppress their self through the art use pencil and paper, And now we can get a better understand of the art that was in 1800 or 1900 history.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Using cars on this lovely planet is a good but also bad thing. Cars usage is good when riding to work or going to visit out of town. But cars polute the earth to with greenhouse gases and is making the earth hotter every year which will eventually melt the polar ice caps and everything will soon die . Fancy cars may be nice but it may the thing that kills us and everything living . Spending lots on a carv is really just wasteful,well i guess not all the time. Some days when your running late to work and dont have enough time to ride your bike or walk then you can take a car, or maybe if work is just to far than you can just take a car. Twelve percent of greenhose gases comes from cars .In paris a twenty two euro fine is commited if an even numbered license plate if car was not left home and odd was the following day. although the number in 2000 was 4,000 it soon went down to 2,645 in 2012.\n\nYoung drivers in barcelona decreased by 23 percent in 2001 to 2009 ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "WHAT IS THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE?\n\nDOES THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE WORK?\n\n''THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE IS A PROCESS NOT A PLACE THE FOUNDING FATHERS ESTABLISHED IT IN THE CONSTITUTION AS A COMPRIMISE BETWEEN ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENT BY VOTE IN CONGRESS AND ELECTIION OF THE PRESIDENT BY A POPULAR VOTE OF QUALIFIED CITIZENS''.THIS PROCESS CONSISTS OF 538 ELECTORS. ALSO EACH CANDIDATE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN YOUR STATEHAS HIS OR HER OWN GROUP OF ELECTORS.\n\n\"WHAT HAVE RICHARD NIXON, JIMMY CARTER, BOB DOLE, AND THE US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, AND THEIR AFL-CIO ALL, IN THEIR TIME, AGREE ON\"? THE CORRECT ANSWER IS ABOLISHING THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE. PEOPLE AY THEIR ARE THINGS WRONG WITH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE. THAT IS TRUE. ONE OF THE TINGS THAT IS WRONG WITH IT IS \"UNDER THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE SYSTEM , VOTERS VOT NOT FOR PRESIDENT, BUT FOR A SLATE OF ELECTOERS, WHO IT Turn elect the president.\n\nthese Are what the electoral colleges is and the goods and bads. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.