Split (2)

train · 5.42k rows

messages listlengths 3 3
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I have to admit, the Face is a really cool thing, but it being made by aliens, come on! It is highly unlikable and unreasonable. The face is a landform that has always been there. There are many factors that go into why the Face could not have been created by aliens.\n\nFirst and foremost, conspiracy theorists have no proof that NASA is hiding that their was even an ancient civilization on Mars. In paragraph five, there was a quote that said, \"... defenders of the NASA budget wish there was an ancient civilization on Mars.\" There basically saying that an ancient civilation would have benefited NASA, if they had actually found one. If there was an ancient civilization people would have found out about it already.\n\nIn paragraph seven, on April 5, 1998, the Mars Global Surveyor flew over Cydonia and Michael Malin, with his Mars Orbiter Camera, took pictures of the the original Vikings photo that were ten times sharper. The new photos revealed a natural landform. The camera quality was poor in the original photo in 1976. That explains why the landform appeared to look like a face. As time past and technology improved, NASA was able to make out that the face was an illusion from bad camera quality.\n\nGoing along with the previous paragraph, people believe that the cause for the landform in the photo, in 1998, to not have a face is because of aliens! In paragraph eight, the camera, that they used to take the photo with, had to peer through clouds to see the Face. People believed that the clouds were created by aliens so that they could hide the Face. I do admit that clouds could have affected the photo, but they were clearly wrong. In the ninth paragraph, on April 8, 2001, The Mars Global Surveyor took another photo in the camera's highest resolution on a cloudless day, and once agian, the picture revealed a natural landform.\n\nWith most of the information in the article, I can conclude that the Face was just a picture that created controversy because of its uniqueness. I mean, it was a face on Mars! It was taken a long time, with poor camera quality, causing the landform to look like a face. It was a misconception that affected our viewpoints on NASA and influenced many aspects of our Entertainment.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "We all had dreams about having flying cars and driveless cars, but now we can almost say our dreams are becoming a reality. Automakers are working on manufacturing driveless cars. Driveless cars will eventually help us all in the future, when they are developed. If someone is drunk driving the car will for the most part drive itself with the help of sensors. If someone has fallen asleep in the car and something bad happens the car will alert the driver. First the automakers thought of making smarter roads, but with out the option of smarter roads, the manufacturers then thought about smarter cars. They did not know exactly how smart the cars would have to be but they knew for sure that they would need a lot of sensors to start out with.\n\nTo help support the claim that driveless cars will be helpful in the future is the fact that they will have many sensors. The new driveless cars will have a position sensor on the left rear wheel. This helps the car stay in between the lines while driving. The next senor will be a rotationg sensor on the roof so the car knows where other cars are around it and when to stop at red lights, stop signs, yield signs, etc. It will also have four automotive radar sensors and an intertial motion sensor, to detect the movement of other cars. The car will still have a speed and brake sensor also to know how fast it is going and when to stop. The driveless car will have a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, so the car knows how far and if there is a car behind them. Lastly the car will have a GPS recevier so the car knows where it is going. All of these sensors are installed to keep the driver safe and improve on how the vehicle can drive on its own.\n\nThe car is also very easy to take control of. For the things the sensors can not sense the car will alert the driver when they need to take control. The human in the car should always remain alert for when these problems may occur but if they can not the car will send the driver an alert. The new driveless cars will have seats that vibrate when the vehicle is in danger. If the driver has fallen asleep then the vibration of the car should be firm enough to wake them up. Now while the driver is just waking up they do not really know what is going on, so the driveless car will also announce that there is a problem and the driver should take control. By the car announce when there is a problem is very helpful because if one of the sensors were to go out then that would be a problem and the car will announce it and the human will take over.\n\nEven though the car will be very helpful there are some problems that could occur. The only way to know for sure that someone will be safe while driving is to have a human in control at all times. Driving laws are focused on keeping drivers, passengers, and pedestrians safe, and the lawmakers know that safety is best achieved when the driver is fully alert. That is why the driveless car will have many sensors for when they sense a problem occuring on the road or occuring within the car. When the sensors do sense a problem occuring the car with alert the driver and let them know that they need to take control by vibrating the seat and announcing the problem. Though many people think driveless cars are not safe, automakers are continuing to work and test the cars until we can know for sure that they are completely safe for all drivers. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The planet of Venus is considered to be a danger to humans given the conditions it is in. In the article \" The Challenge of Exploring Venus\", the author suggests that depsite the dangers presented by Venus, it would be a worthy pursuit to study the planet. The author helpfully establishes multiple key pieces of evidence supporting this claim such as Venus may have once been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system, Venus is the nearest option for a planetary visit, and trying to get to Venus is considered a challenge that could help humans prepare for even more extremely challenging environments.\n\nIn paragraph two, the author states \"Often refered to as Earth's \"twin,\" Venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occasionally the closest distance too.\" This quote, along with this quote, \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.\" showcase exactly how alike Venus may have been to Earth. This could be helpful in studying the possibilities of what may eventually happen to planet Earth.\n\nNot many planets are as close to Earth as Venus is and that is a crucial point when the amount of time space travel can take is taken into consideration. Humans have accomplished and gained much knowledge about space travel since the race to space began. Scientists' have meticulously studied everything they could learn about space and can even estimate how much time it would take to travel to different places in space. This is crucial when you take into consideration how much time, effort, and money goes into space travel. With Venus being so close to the Earth, and all those factors taken into consideration, it seems to be an obvious and intelligent choice to make that humans should not give up on travelling and studying Venus. More than anything, it would be a wasted opportunity.\n\nWhile the idea of being able to study Venus seems daunting, perhaps it is only the lack of courage that is holding NASA back from doing it. Curiosity is a natural thing that all humans are born with, and it never goes away. This is relevant because with curiosity, the gain of knowledge can go hand in hand with it. Without curiosity, not even half of the things humans have done and developed would be possible. Shying away from Venus is doing more harm than good, and it will only serve to produce hesitancy at the sight of any challege.\n\nThe author of the Article \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\" brings up many key points of evidence as to why Venus should be explored and studied, despite the dangers of it. Among those are, it is the closest planet to Earth relatively speaking, Venus is the closest distance, and the study of the planet Venus brings up a unique challenge to the human race that backing down from would be detrimental. All of the key points supports the author's idea that studying venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Many people might think that the face on Mars was created by aliens and many others might think that it is just a natural landform.\n\nThere is no proof for any of the rumors.\n\nPeople have had clues about them.\n\nSome say that it looks like an Egypitan Pharaoph, others say it looks like a river from Idaho.\n\nThe face has become so popular that it was starred in movies, magazines, books and talk shows.\n\nIt was so popular because it was unusual.\n\nNASA knew once they showed the public the picture they would attract more attention to the planet Mars.\n\nThe Mars Orbiter Camera team flew over Cydonia and took a picture that came out more clear than the first picture that NASA took.\n\nTo get the picture was hard work.\n\nThey usually do not pass over Cydonia very often.\n\nThere is a spacecraft that will fly over the location and scan it like a fax machine.\n\nThe picture of the face may mean different things to people and some may have different opinions about it.\n\nOne person said it looked like a mesa formed by lava.\n\nIf NASA done more research about the face in Cydonia they might be able to figure out what it is and what caused it.\n\nUnitl someone says what it really is, it will just be a big mystery.\n\nYou can spot the head shaped figure from two miles away.\n\nPhotographing the landform became important to NASA and the Mars Global Surveyor.\n\nThey also felt that it was important for taxpayers.\n\nNo matter how cloudy or hard it was to see and capture the face, they still made it work.\n\nThe crew in the Mars Global Surveyor said there were alien markings that were hidden.\n\nWhen Malin's team tried again to find another photo they went on a cloudless day and used the maximum resolution and got another picture.\n\nWhen they used the maximum resolution you could see things that were even on the ground such as planes or pyramids.\n\nThey also stated that the landform was almost the same as a butte.\n\nThe landorms were common around the American West. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Technology is overwhelming the world that we live in today. The new technological developments have been influencing every aspect of our daily lives. Electronics affect our social life, home life, work places, schools, and shopping areas because of what it can provide for us. Technology devices are being used in car manufacturing to be able to make driving for everyday people much easier.\n\nGoogle cofounder Sergey Brin is planning ahead, and making goals, to envision what the future driverless cars look like. Driverless cars are, I admit, are a major safety hazard if you dont use the right equipment, but they could be a great invention to help improve our planet. Brin claimes that he sees that these cars will be able to cut down the use of fuel and be able to offer more flexibility than what a bus has. In less than a decade, we have been able to create and start producing ideas that have never been possible in the history of mankind.\n\nSelf-driving cars has been thought about since the 1950's, when General Motors had tested a car to run on a special track. They used electrical cables, radio signals, magnets to make this concept function. If we are trying to make cars available for the public, then we need to get past the thought of special roads and start making them equipt for the conditions that we have to drive through today. Sensors are now plaing a big role in the making of driverless cars. We use them to see our surroundings, and make sure that the people around us are in not in danger of our driving. Cars detect the objects around us because of these sensors, and now can take control of our brakes and engines when the human driver isn't paying attention. If we continue to improve these sensors, then we will be able to have cars that are able to handle these situations on their own.\n\nPeople who oppose this concept are thinking that sensors can't always be as active, when driving, as what a human driver is. Technological problems are able to cause the sensors to be inable to do their job. This doesn't just create a safety hazard for the people inside of the car, but for any pedestrians that could come across this car. Also, how much would it cost to have a car with this many sensors in it? People who make an average amount of money won't be able to buy these cars if they're prices are tooo high. Sure, all of these are cautions when people are pushing a new and risky idea but it's all able to be solved. The car dealerships can lower their prices, they can run many tests on these cars to find new problems, and even the cars we drive today are having malfunctioning problems.\n\nTechnology devices are being used in car manufacturing to be ablet to make driving for eveyrday people much easier. Everyday we are inching closer and closer to having a new generation of technology, and driverless cars are apart of that new generation. We are now able to do bigger and better things to make life easier for the generations behind us. In a situation like this, the problems are able to be fixed. Instead of being afraid of what could happen, we should be taking steps forward to see what the future can provide for us. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The electoral college process consist of the selection of the elector, the meeting of the electors where they vote for president and vice president in a way to let us the people choose to keep our country safe and to help our community. So therefore i think we should keep the electoral college.\n\nUnder the 23rd Amendment of the constitution, the District of columbia is allocated 3 electors and treated like a state for purpose of the Electoral College. Also we help choose our states electors when we vote for president, but if we did'nt have an electoral college there would'nt be any reason to have a president or government.\n\nBut each party selects a slate of electors trusted to vote for the partys nominee (\n\nand that trust is rarely betrayed\n\n), what they mean by that is that if he or she were to become president they could not lie or betray anyone.\n\nThe electoral college avoids the problem of elections in which no candidate receives a majority of votes cast. I think they should really make people vote because its not fair or equal if only half of us americans voted.\n\nThe winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes induces the canidates as we saw in [\n\n2012's\n\n] election-to focus their campaign efforts on the toss up states. which means almost everyone voted that year.\n\nThe electoral college method helps see who the right person is to help our country. Therefore they need to keep the electoral college for us to see where it will take us all through the years and for us to acknowledge how it has helped americans all around the world to get where they are today. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In our life discovering new things has maked us learn more. In \"The Challange of Exploring Venus,\" the author suggested that studying Venus would be a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents.\n\nOne reason from \"The Challange of Exploring Venus,\" for example, it said \"Hottest surface tempeture of any planet in our solar system.\" This showed that Venus was so hot becuase it is closer to the sun and has a different views then what we see here on earth.\n\nAnother reason would be that in Venus could have supported different forms of life on earth. In \"The Challange of Exploring Venus,\" for instance it said \"Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on earth.\" This demonstrated that in Venus has some similar things like rocky sediment, valleys, mountains, and craters similar to the ones on earth.\n\nLastly, the final reason would be in \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus,\"\n\nfor example, it said \" Venus is the closest planet to the earth in terms of density and size.\" This showed that the earth has another planet the same size but, Venus is closer to the sun which changes the climate.\n\nIn conclusion, studying Venus would help us learn more of what is out there in space. The two planets Venus and Earth both have simlarities but, we can see why one if different than the other. Learning about different planets can open our minds to explore more and see the values different planets have. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In my position, driverless cars is something I am against and something that I will not use in the future. I am against the idea of driverless cars because of many specific reasons. There is also the joy of learning how to drive and learning from our mistakes on driving. Maybe someone wants hack your car and it will just stop out of no where. There are also good reasons to have a driverless car for you to own. Those are some reasons I have on why I am against or with driverless cars.\n\nSomewhere there is always a person that wants to do or cause bad things. Maybe this person wants to stop all the cars from working while they're in traffic. They can also cause a crash with 2 or more cars. Then people would just end up in the hospital. There is always a person like that, so that is one reason why I against driverless cars.\n\nThere are also good reasons to have a driverless car for you to own. Maybe you're in an accident and you need to get to a hospital and you can't drive, well then you can have your driverless car drive for you. Someone may have a child on board and they might need a diaper change or they need something, well you can help your child while your car drives for you. Say you're about to crash and your driverless car saves you with the sensors it has. There are some good reasons to have a driverless car as well.\n\nIn conclusion driverless cars is a no for me but there is also good reasons. Such as a hacker, hacking your car ans making you crash and ending up in the hosptial. There is a good reason too is for when you're in accidents. Last is the joy of learning and driving a car. This is why I am against driverless cars.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "A world without having a car payment. It sounds too good to be true, but it isn't. Driverless transportation is coming in the near future and it's coming fast. Self-operating cars are a great idea because cars that don't need drivers would save time, reduce accidents, make the roads a safer place, and increase the efficiency of vehicles.\n\nDriverless vehices would create time for people to catch up on work, a T.V. show, make phone calls, connect with people, or even read. Of course, the driver would still need to keep an eye out for the signal the car would give in construction areas or heavy traffic. The artcile says \"Why would anyone want a driverless car that still needs a driver? Wouldn't drivers get bored waiting for their turn to drive? \"The psychological aspects of automation are really a challenge,\" admits Dr. Werner Huber, a BMW project manager driver. \"We have to interpret the fun driving in a new way.\" Some manufacturers hope to do that by bringing in-car entertainment and information systems that use heads-up displays. Such displays can be turned off instantly when the driver needs to take over- something not available to drivers trying to text with a cell phone. In this way, the in-car system is actually a safety feature, and safety is a big concern.\" The in-car entertainment/information system would be a way for drivers to relax while waiting to arrive at their destination.\n\nDriverless cars would also decrease the amount of accidents that occur. The car would be covered in sensors and devices that could create images of surroundings. The article states \"Google's modified Toyota Prius uses position-estimating sensors, on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, and an inertial motion sensor.\" All of the technology on the car would alert the driver of any potential harm. The article also says \"The most important bit of\n\ntechnology in this system is the spinning sensor on the roof. Dubbed LIDAR, it uses laser beams to form a constantly updating 3-D model of the car's surroundings.\" This would be especially helpful out where I live because it could reduce the amount of lives taken from crashing into deer. Also, it would decrease the amount of pedestrians hit and injured or killed.\n\nEfficiency in automatic cars would also increase. Sensors would control all functions in the vehicle, thus increasing efficiency. The article states \"The information from the sensors can cause the cars to apply brakes to individual wheels and reduce power from the engine, allowing far better response and control than a human driver could manage alone. Further improvements in sensors, and computer hardware, and software to make driving safer are also leading to cars that can handle more and more on their own.\" The vehicle's efficiency increases, lowering harmful emissions released in the air.\n\nDriverless cars would be a benefit to almost everyone, providing that they actually succeed in their task. After automatic personal cars comes auto personal transportation, therefore eliminating a car payment. Driverless transportation is coming in the near future and it's coming fast. Self-operating cars are a great idea because cars that don't need drivers would save time, reduce accidents, make the roads a safer place, and increase the efficiency of vehicles. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Saving The World, One Car At A Time\n\nIn country like Germany,Paris, and Colombia, they limit the use of cars due to carbon emission. I think that this is a great idea. Limiting car usage means less pollination, which would benefit us greatly.\n\n\"If this patterns persists\" says Elisabeth Rosenthal, we could turn this problem around. Take Paris for instance, they issued a ban against driving on specific days. Though \"almost 4,000 drivers were fined, according to Robert Duffer's article, the\"congestion was down 60 percent. You can't tell me that is not remarkable.\n\nWe could just take a day and walk or ride our bicycle to work/school, and make a difference, so let's try. I know some people think that driving less is an inconvience and won't stop carbon emission, but I think the opposite is true. There will be \"gray clouds\" like Andrew Selsky says, but we CAN save the world, even if it just one car at a time. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that the Facial Action Coding system sounds really cool and unique but I don't know if I fully agree with the being able to read the emotional expressions of students in a class room because I defintley feel like It would take alot more work than just a simple computer program and a computer. The reson why I would say I don't fully agree with that is because I feel like somethings are good without having technology and today alot of teachers know when your sad,borad,happy,mad and so on. But the main thing is with this is somthing I wouldn't wanna take away from friendships because I feel like a lot of good friends can always or always know when you are sad or mad and things like that and your friends could also help you through that. Another thing is that I feel like if a kid gets confused I feel like thats why there are teachers there in the room to help and be able to personally walk through physical and mentally be able to help him them, also I think that most of the kids would understand a little bit better than what they would with the helping of an instructor on the computer. But I really do think that it sounds like a really cool idea its just that some of that stuff you don't wanna take away from the actual feelings part or help from others.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Face? Created by Aliens or just a landmark?\n\nDid you beieve that the \"Unmasking the Face on Mars\" was just created by aliens. NASA has given us many reasons to believe what they say, and not many reasons for us not believe them. I am a NASA researcher and I'm telling you why the \"Face\" is actually just a landmark.\n\nThere are many reasons why the \"Unmasking the Face on Mars\" is a natural land form. The first reason is that NASA took three different pictures, one picture was in 1976 in the picture you can't really see anything. Scientists just thought it was another Matian mesa. At this time the cameras weren't very 3D like. So how do we know it's an actual face?\n\nThe seacond reason it is a landform is because NASA\n\nsent another crew to take more pictures of the \"face.\" The crew took ten pictures that were sharper than the first one in 1976. In this picture you start to see something appear. They even say \"when the image first appeared on a JPL web site, revealing... a natural landform. People were not very happy when they heard it wasn't a alien monument.\n\nAnother reason is that they thought alien markings were being hazed. So, when they went back it was a cloudless summer. In the text they say \"Each pixel in the 2001 image spans 1.56 meters, compared to 43 meters per pixel in the best 1976 Viking photo. That is a huge difference from 1976. What the picture shows is the Martian equivalent of a butte or messa.\n\nIf you really think about it though, how come they jumped to conclusions so fast? In the passage it says it would be a good way to engage the public to Mars. Wouldn't it just attract more people to NASA to though?\n\nIn many ways there are more reasons to why this \"Face\" is more of a landmark than anything. From the different years they took the years, to the landmarks being hazed. You could probably think of a lot of questions to ask NASA about the photos and what the scientists are saying, but until you go up to Mars we will only know what they are telling us. Which is that the \"face\" is a mesa. They clearly say many times in the passage for people to believe that they are not trying to trick you. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The thought of being able to calculate someone's emotions is absoutely far-fetched, and yet, it is becoming a reality. Dr. Paul Eckman created a facial recognition system to be able to associate emotions with certian facial characteristics. In the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile,\" by Nick D'Alto, the author expresses how valuable this system could be in the classroom.\n\nIn the article, D'Alto writes about an example Dr. Huang speaks of about being in a classroom. \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored,' Dr. Huang predicts. 'Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.'\" This shows one way the technology could be valuable in the classroom. For example, teachers often have a tough time keeping the class engaged during his or her lecture. In return, a computer in the classroom with this technology could keep a class engaged by steering the direction of the conversation. According to the author, \"the software can even identify mixed emotions.\" This eliminates all complications of trying to read multiple emotions, which could also be valuable to teachers in a classroom setting.\n\nThe author also writes about Dr. Huang's claim on how this technology goes along with other technology. \"The same technology can make computer-animated faces more expressive--for video games or video surgery.\" A lot of students in the classroom setting want to grow up into different occupations, some becoming nurses, doctors, and even surgeons. This technology can help in the ways of getting hands-on training without the fear of harming an actual human. In addition, Dr. Huang claims computers can help understand communication, since he claims \"most human communication is nonverbal.\" Computers being able to understand communication, emotional or not, could lead to a huge step in the direction of improving technology, increasing its value.\n\nLastly, the author strongly writes about the positive aspects of this technology. In one way, he writes about how this technology can strongly help us understand faces in the real world, along with faces in art and photography. D'Alto writes, \"using video imagery, the new emotion-recognition software tracks these facial movements--in a real face or in the painted face of Mona Lisa.\" In this aspect, the technology can be used to better understand and grasp art in an entire new way. He also writes, \"Dr. Huang observes that artists such as da Vinci studied human anatomy to help them paint facial muscles precisely enough to convey specific emotions. His new computer software stores similar anatomical information as electronic code.\" For this example of text, D'Alto explains how much information the technology was able to uncover. The amount of information is something that no one could grasp just from first sight, proving how high this technology could be of value in an art classroom.\n\nIn conclusion, the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile,\" written by Nick D'Alto helps prove just how valuable this technology could be in a classroom. It can help teachers to teach, students to learn, students to communicate, and students to learn information that they would not be able to without the technology. Technology as valuable as this should be used in classrooms.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "NASA has discovered many incredible supernatural things, but they do not believe any of these situations was caused by the existance of aliens. I do not believe that the Face was caused by aliens.\n\nFirst of all, the Face does not signify a statue or proof of alien existance. In paragraph 7, the text clearly states, \" There was no alien monument after all.\"\n\nThis means that aliens could not have created the Face as a signification or monument to proof thier existance.\n\nSecond, the Face is a landform. The Face looks more a landform that could have caused by the harsh weather on Mars. In paragraph 12, the text clearly states,\"What the picture actually shows is the Martian equivalent of a butte or mesa-landforms that are common around the American West.\" The author also states in the text,\" It reminds me mostly of the Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain in Idaho.\" This means that the Face was a landforms caused by its location on Mars.\n\nCA: Aliens could have made the Face as a siblimal message. They could not have because there is not any evidence that aliens did it. The Face is in the north part of Mars and that is a lava dome that takes form of an isolated mesa.\n\nIn conclusion, aliens did not cause the Face on Mars because it is a land form caused by the weather on Mars. If aliens caused the Face on Mars it could have a been more evidence of their existance, and the Face would not look more of a landform. Otherwise, I do not believe the face was caused by aliens, more so of a landform. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Do you think the Facial Action Coding System would be helpful in a classroom? Some may say this technology is not helpful or it is not accurate. However this advance technology is very accurate, can recognize emotions better than humans, and it would make sure the studentrs are interested in the lesson that they are being taught.\n\nThe facial Coding Action System is very accurate it can calculate how happy you are or how angry you are and much more. Accordding to Nick D'Alto this technology creates a 3-D face and calculates all movement on the 44 major muscles of the face. This technology then relies of psychology to determine the emotion that the human is showing.\n\nUs humnas can also tell when a person is sad or angry by seeing their facial expressions. Although we may not be as accurate because we cannot always tell the difference between a fake smile and a honest smile. The Facial Action Coding System can tell the difference between an honest smile and an untruthful smile. This technology can accurately tell us how happy we are or how worried we are, it can even calculate mixed emotions.\n\nThis technolgy can also be used to improve learning in a classroom since it could out if a student is showing interest in the subject. A computer in a classroom could help kids be more engaged in the leasson and learn more, the Facial Action Coding System could tell if a student is confused or bored and even stressed. Then the computer would simply make some changes to the lesson to keep students focused and engaged. Teachers don't always have the capacity to tell if a student is confused or stressed but using this technology could help them teach their students in a more effective way.\n\nThe use of this technolgoy is simply reliable, trusted, and helpful. This technology could be used for so much more other then just school like safety at an airport or proving someone guilty in a court room, for now we'll just have to wait.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that we shoud include this type of technology into the classrooms. So that this way we could know what a student is thinking about the subject he is learning. If he/she is bored the teacher can maybe think of a way to make the class a bit more fun or entertaining in a way. The text states \"Then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" This type of technology could also help with class debates were the teacher says something like who ever wants pizza raise your hand and who ever wants salad raise your hand. Which ever one gets the most votes is what we will eat. And some where between the kid some one might say make sure to vote for pizza or else were not friends anymore and with the machine we could detect if a kid is truthful to what they voted for.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "First of all, the face of the earth was created but not created by someone. So many people did millions upon millions of researcha dn it appears that the scientest thinks that is was just another Martin mesa which is really common thoughout Cydonia. Some people think it is just a huge rock formation, the authors reasoned it would be a good way to enage the public and attract attention is Mars.\n\nThe face of the mars has become a pop icon which is also know as like the popular thing everyone is talking about, I mean even talk shows are talking about it. It is so popular they ar putting it in books.Again some people believed it was created by aliens. Is that even real? Many people went into outerspace just to get pictures of it and to see it in real life. Thousands of people were waiting for it to go viral, but did it ever?\n\nNot everyone\n\nwas satisfied with this master piece. The face on mars is located 41 degrees north martian lattitude where it was winter in April of '98. A cloudy time of the yaer on the red planet. The camera on board had to peer through wispy clouds to see the face. Perhaps, said skeptics alien markings were hidden. Over time mission controllers prepared to look again. This is very very hard work to do and whoever does it creds to you. Mars global surveyor is mapping the spacecraft that normally looks straeight down and scans the planet like a fax machine. They don't\n\njust pass over the face very often.\n\nIt then appears that who ever came up with this stuff is so weird. On digital things you can make anything 3 times bigger than the pixel size. In reality the picture has shown Martian equibalint of a butte or mesa. Which is landforms common around the American est. That is a lava dome that takes the form of an isolated mesa abouth the same height at the Face on Mars.\n\nIn my opinion, whoever thinks something like this is true you are insane. No alien is going to draw or do whatever they did on the face of mars. LIke no if you do think that you are seriously crazy.\n\nAleins are'nt even real, but this was a very very intrestin topic to talk about and it just sums up all the stuff from NASA. This article has brought my attention ever since I started reading over this topic. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Prof. Thomas Huang, Prof. Nicu Sebe and Dr. Paul Eckman have been able tro design, read and determine emotions using a computer software called Facial Action Coding System (FACS). Using this technology, they were able to make a computer generated 3-D model of the face in this world famous painting. Using the muscles that lay underneath the skin in this 3-D model, the software is able to determine the emotion of the person based off of the physical characteristics and movement of the muscles.\n\nIn using the FACS software \"'A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored' predicted Dr. Huang\" (paragraph 6). Much like a classroom instructor, the computer and software will be able to modify the lesson and instruction to further engage and explain to the student.\n\nHowever, in a classroom, it seems that teachers will rarely change lesson plans to engage their students, and will further explain only if a specific question is asked, regardless of the look of confusion of the students' faces.\n\nFuthermore, teachers and program writers would have to code for and write many forms of the lesson to explain or engage the students before uploading it to the computer for lessons. If a student is bored or confused, the software and computer system will have to be able to 1) recognze the facial expression and 2) choose from several lesson plans to fit and better the facial expression of the student/user.\n\nAs a student, I do not find myself to be facially expressive on the computer, in fact the only expresson I have is within my mind, while my face remains blank. This would make it impossibke for the FACS to identify bordom or confusion. There is also the possiblilty of the software confusing one of these facial expressions with that of concentration when reading or writing.\n\nThe article states that \" Your home PC can't handle the complex algorithms used to decode Mona Lisa's smile.\" (Paragraph 7) If the same algorithms (FACS) would be used to determine the facial feature of Mona Lisa and her expression to aid the computer in determining the facial characteristics and emotions of a student. At our 1-on-1 technology based school, students can either rent laptops or provide their own for school work. If our personal computers cannot store the algorithms of FACS to determine the facial features of students then it would be entirely useless. The school would have to purchase entirely new computers for every student in the school, with the RAM and capacity to read emotions and contain the FACS. These computers would have to be laptops so they can be transported between classes, school and home. This would be too costly for the school or students and improbable in being able to find and provide the correct kiond of computer.\n\nIf the FACS needs to be able to computer generate a 3-D model of the face, the computer would run signifigantly slower because it is trying to read your emotions and run any other programs you have open for your class work. Unlike the Mona LIsa, our faces are already three-dimensional, however the computer software would have to be able to generate a computer model of the students face and expression by examining the muscles underneath in the model, which in all liklihood would take much longer to complete than it does for an expression to change or the comprehension of a subject ot take place.\n\nTo conclude, although the Facial Action Coding System would hypothetically work to decide emotions, it would be entirely too costly, time consuming, and unlikey in te effectivness of being able to read the expressions of students during class.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In my opinion, joining the Seagoing Cowboys is a fantastic opportunity. If you get the chance, I recommend that you sign up as soon as possible. I did, and my experience was amazing. Let me explain why.\n\nOne reason that you should join the Seagoing Cowboys is because you get to help countries in need. The Seagoing Cowboys are a part of the United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Adminstration, and provide countries with cattle that the countries might not have because of war. You also get the opportunity to visit many gorgeous and fascinating places. On my trips, I got to visit Europe, China, Venice, and even the Acropolis in Greece, and many more locations. If you like to travel and see new areas, then becoming a part of the Seagoing Cowboys is an opportunity of a lifetime. Even if you're not very into traveling, but you like working with animals, joing the Seagoing Cowboys is still a great idea. On the trips, you spend the majority of your time working with horses, young cows, and mules, which can be a wonderful opportunity for a fan of animals. But the trips aren't all work. You can still fit in time for fun and pass time with a lot activities, such as baseball, volleyball, fencing, whittling, etc. Even better, though, you can become more aware of people in other countries and their needs, which can make you more sympathetic and kind to people who are from different countries, especially countries that are poor and aren't the best places for people to live. These are just a few of the reasons why you should join the Seagoing Cowboys.\n\nAs I stated before, the Seagoing Cowboys is a fantastic opportunity, and if you ever get the chance, you should join as soon as you can. You get to help out countries in need, visit many beautiful and unique places, and get more experience on working with animals. The trips are also quite fun, and there are many activites that you can do, especially after the animals have been unloaded. You can even learn about people in other countries and their struggles, which can prevent you from being ignorant, and that awareness can make you kinder. This is all why you should definitely consider participating in the Seagoing Cowboys.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Since the early 1900's, cars have been an integral part of the human life. Cars allow people to get everything that they need accomplished complete. Whether it's picking up groceries, picking up your child from dance classes, traveling across the country, or just sitting in the driver's seat listening to John Mayer rethinking the highlights of your day. Metaphorically, the car is what truly allows the world to continue rotating on it's axis. For this reason, advancing the wonderful technology of automobiles will bolster appreciation of drivers and car lovers everywhere.\n\nIn the world of technology, we see advancements, modifications, and improvements every second. Why not advance the beauty of automobiles? Automobiles are like a second home to some people, especially those with busy lives that require a plethora of transportation from place to place. I believe that now is the time to create a car that has the capabilities of being driverless. A car that allows for a safer, more effecient environment. According to the story, \"Google has had cars that could drive independently under specific conditions since 2009\". Accordingly, they have driven roads calculating distances of more than half a million miles WITHOUT a crash. This is a truly amazing discovery. Progress is key to creating a future of state of the art technology.\n\nHence, in an effort to bolster encouragement for creative and innovative thinking, one must realize that in the lenses of 'driverless' cars... I don't believe the ultimate goal is to strip humans of the ability to control their car but improve the flexibility of it. For instance, if we have a car that is capable of being driven manually and automatically, this opens a variety of opportunity to the driver. Let's take this anecdote as an example: Johnny is a very busy businessman. He is always traveling to and from meetings. In fact, Johnny has a meeting to attend in 5 minutes and he hasn't eaten anything all day. Considering Johnny's situation, he could use a driverless car right about now. Instead of driving to the meeting, Johnny can flip a switch that activates 'autodrive' and pick up a McDonald's salad and chow down. Suffice to say, driverless cars can and will be effecient to the business driver and the everyday soccer mom.\n\nWhether it's in 2016 or 2020, the efficiency of cars need to come up to par with the standards of this generation. Times are changing and improved technology is required in order to move forward in a variety of aspects. The driverless car can and will improve the overall quality of life. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear state senator, we should do Electoral College because it will be easier to vote and will only use votes of qualified citizens. The Electoral College has a consist selection of the electors, the meeting of electors where they can vote for President and Vice President, and counting electoral votes by congress.\n\nThe Electoral College has 538 electors, and majority of 270 electoral votes that is required to elect the presedent. Also, under the 23rd amendment of the constitution, the distric of columbia is allocated 3 electors and treated like a state for this reason, the word \"state\" also refers to district of columbia.\n\nPlus, the presidential election is held every 4 years on a Tuesday after the first Monday of in November, and when you choose your states electors when you vote for president, you also are actually voting for your candidates electors. After the presidential election, the governor of your state prepares a listing of all the candidates who ran for President in your state along with the names of their respective electors called, \"Certificate of Ascertainment\".\n\nYour state also sends a Certificates of ascertainment to the Congress and National Archives as part of the official records of thee presidential election. The Electoral College is also a widely regarded as an anachronoism, which is a non-democratic method of selecting a president that ought to be overruled by the candidates who recieved the most popular votes the winner.\n\nThis positions are correct in arguing that the Electroal College method is not democratic in modern sense, but it is the electors who elect the president, not the people. When people vote for the president they are actually voting for a state of electors. The outcome of this meathod is that the Electoral College vote is possible but its less likely to dispute over the popular vote. That is why we should do Electoral College. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The challenge of Venus. Venus is sometimes called the evening star why because it's one of the brightest points of light in the night time. The nickname evening star is misleading because Venus is planet its the secound planet of the sun. Venus is a worthy pursuit. Venus is planet not a star it the secound planet of the sun.\n\nVenus is a planet. Venus is often referred as Earth's twin Venus is the closest planet to Earth terms of density and size. Venus is occasionally the closest in distance to Earth. The diffrences of Venus is the speed sometimes we are closer to Mars then Venus because Venus is right around the coner and they have sent many spacecraft to land but not many have lasted a few hours. Venus is referred as Earth's twin planet and closest to Earth.\n\nA thick atmosphere of 97 percent of carbon dioxide blankets Venus. On planet's surface the average temperatures is 800 degress Fahrenheit and the pressure of the atmospheric is 90 times greater what we experience on our planent. Venus has the hottest temperature of any planet in our solar system. Venus is blanket by a 97 percent of carbon dioxide and has the hottest temperature of any planet in solar system.\n\nScientists are discussing further visits to its surface. Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because its was once most like planet in our sytem. Venus can probably could been covered by a ocean and could supported various forms of life. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration has been sending people to study Venus. Scientists still discuses about futher visits and NASA has send people to study venus.\n\nThe author suggests that studying Venus is dangers yes he's right because Venus is one of the hottest planet even though Mercury is closer to our sun beyond the high pressure and heat Veusian weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes. So yes its dangers studying Venus many space craft haven't lasted hours in venus. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "If I was a scientist I would convience them that the face in the ground was just a natural landform in many ways. Some people around the world think things like this would be great to brag about. In this sitiuation We're trying to convience people and tell them that aliens has nothing to do with this.\n\nIn this article, it says that it isn't alien related. Reasons that I would conclude is, as scientists research it is just a landform. Scientists also says that its just another Martian mesa. It's related to the red planet Cydonia. As the one scientist took it among himself and took the picture alot of times just to get a great angle of it everyone was waiting for it. Even web surfers this was a huge impact on the people believing that it was a alien.\n\nAs I read more not all the people were ok with the problem. Seems that scientists had found more. If I were a scientist I would gather evidence and all my documents from things that were related to this previous sitiuation.\n\nI would also show them pictures back then of the planet. It would be amazing because as a scientist you should always check for yourself. If you did a previous report on that planet or subject I think you should bring your old evidence and documents out to make things come together to understand better.\n\nIn this article, I've learned alot about what scientists go through and they they busy life is. It was exciting reading about this and exploring something like this. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Changing The Future\n\nTimes are changing. Driverless car technology is being created, with slow and steady progress. The technology for these type of cars has only been developed over the last few years because of a lack of technology. There are several companies trying to develop these cars, but they're pretty much at the same step. Knowing how driverless technology works, who is liable for damages, and how it will effect drivers is crucial to the possible future use of driverless cars.\n\nDriverless technology has to be understood by the consumer. If the consumer does not know how this technology works, it could cause some serious damage.\n\nThe consumer has to realize that driverless cars aren't completely driverless, the consumer has to know that they have to remain attentive while being in the driver's seat. \"They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road ahead requires human skills, such as navigating through work zones and around accidents.\" (Driverless Cares Are Coming paragraph 7). Without the realization that they have to be attentive, some bad accidents could occur.\n\nLiability for the accidents caused by driverless cars has to be settled. The companies that make the driverless cars, or the driver, it is yet to be determined who would be at fault. The company for making flawed technology, or the driver for being in the car. \"Still, even if traffic laws change, new laws will be needed in order to cover liability in the case of an accident. If the technology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the manufacturere?\" (Driverless Cars Are Coming paragraph 9). This will be a huge issue if driverless cars do become legal. Driverless cars could effect the people in more way than one.\n\nThe effect of drivers in the future if cars become driverless. Their is a great possibility of issues coming with driverless cars, some subtle, and some severe. Also, who would want a driverless car if you still had to driver it? That does defeat the purpose of the name of the car. \"Wouldn't drivers get bored waiting for their turn to drive?\" (Driverless Cars Are Coming paragraph 8). Being occupied while sitting there is imperative. People will become bored if they have to just sit in the seat all day long. Companies have to come of with entertainment systems, but an issue with that is losing attention. While being in the driver's seat of a driverless car, being attentive is imperative. There may be situations where the car cannot handle it, and it requires human skills. \"This means the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires.\" (Driverless Cars Are Coming paragraph 7). There is a double whammy right there. Companies have to balance out occupying the driver and keeping them attentive; but there is no way to be distracted and attentive at the same time.\n\nThe risks involved with driverless cars are way to high for the potential payoff. The technology that is being developed might have a future, but in the near future, there is no way it'll work. Right now, they aren't even driverless cars, the cars still require a driver. Surely there will be progress on that aspec of the cars. Just simple knowing how the cars work is the first obsticle. Also, being able to figure out who is liable for damages between the manufacturer, or the driver of the car is a huge issue that comes with this. Lastly, how it will effect future driver's skills, and attentiveness while driving. Will there be a future in this industry, or not? Only time will tell. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the passage the author tells how Venus is \"a very challenging place to examie more closely.\" She also explains the imortance of sending things to explore Venus and learning more about our solar system.\n\nIn the passgae the suther continually talks about how dangerous Venus is and how it is unfit for life and needs to be studied. She tells us how \"no spaceship survived the landing for more than a few hours.\" This is very dangerous of course! Ninty-Seven percent of Venus's atmosphere is layers and layers of carbon dioxide and the average temperature being 800 degrees, which makes it impossible for a human to live and breath. Why would the author want people to go to the planet? A person could only survive a short amout of time, even with an oxogen tank.\n\nAstronemers have been fascinated with Venus for years and say it has the most \"earth-like\" quality of any planet with its low valleys and high mountains. Some even think that it may have been filled with oceans and other life at one point.\n\nIn other words, in the future, Venus may be a new planet for earth to explore and visit. With new technology and new ideas, we may be able to see the beauty of Venus. In the passage it says that NASA is studing to send humans to venus one day to find new wonders and glories.\n\nThe author makes a point that just because somthing is dangerous, doesn't mean we shold not take risks to have more advances in technology and to push our limits and explore new places. One day earth will be so advanced in technology, not only will we be able to explore Venus, but other solar systems as well. In the end, every planet should be studied, not just Venus. Even though Venus may still have mysteris right now, we will have to wait for what the future holds to unlock them. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The people have a right to say what they want to happen in their community, state, and even as far as the country they live in. They should be able to decide whether they want a park built in their city or whether they want a specific up and coming President. Yes, popular vote at the moment seems favorable for the people, but it does not mean that the people don't vote in the the process of the Electoral College. They truly do vote for their president, just not in a way that they would like. Nonetheless, they do. That being said, the system of election should be kept to the Electoral College.\n\nTo begin with, the Electoral College, in a sense, is not democratic, as seen in modern times but it does not mean that it is not equal. Yes, they are voting for an elector in their state, trusting that they would vote for their chosen candidate. \"But each party selects a slate of electors trusted to vote for the party's nominee (and that trust is rarely betrayed)...,\" as shown by Richard A. Posner in \"In Defense of the Electoral College: Five reasons to keep our despised method of choosing the President\". This means that, even though the people are voting for an elector to pass on their message, they are still voting to make sure that the president they want to take the seat will get it. The electors so rarely betray the trust of the voters; it has happened one time in 2000, but again that was the first time since 1888. The most thoughtful voters will listen closely to the campaign, then choose which president they feel is fit. Which again, leads to the voters deciding, in the end. Furthermore, the larger states get more attention than the smaller states making it equal amongst those that have more population. For the most part, the Electoral College is equal.\n\nHowever, others can argue against the Electoral College in favor of the popular vote. \"Can voters control whom their electors vote for? Not always,\" said Bradford Plumer in \"The Indefensible Electoral College: Why even the best-laid defenses of the system are wrong.\" That being said, sure they can't control that but the elector rarely betrays the trust of the voters, only happening twice in recorded history. The Electoral College is still less likely to cause a problem than popular vote would. If popular vote were to play in hand as a system of choosing the president, then things outside of even politics such as, riots, would get out of hand. \"...in the Constitution as comprimise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens,\"as said by the Office of the Federal Register in \"What Is the Electoral College?\" Either way, voters do get popular vote, and vote for their elector to vote for their chosen President. It is a balanced idea of both a government and citizen based vote for the leader of the country.\n\nOverall, the Electoral College by far is a balanced system than popular vote is. It is fair, in the sense, that everybody gets a vote and in total, their votes go to what they think is best for their country. Which in turn, does allow for them to decide. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The mona lisa, everyone has either seen or know what the mona lisa is sometime in their lifetime. I think this is a great invention and is very valuable to many artists. Not even just artists though. I think this is vauable to everyone: everyone should enjoy art. Art is so neat and creative and i thhink every painting has a story behind it.\n\nWhy not invent something that make it easy to paint so more poeple can get more paintings out there easier. I love this new technology. Why would you not? the author says \"In fact, we humans perform this same impressive \"calculation\" evry day.\" For example, most humans, if you know someone real well you can probaly tell what they are feeling just by a look at their face.\n\nIf you are feeling sad and want to paint something happy. All you have to do is look in the mirror and make some sort of expression to show how you are feeling/want to feel. This new invention will be able to tell what emotion you are feeling. \"Putting on a happy face\" acutally works,even if its just helping to produce your emotions, says Nick. To an expert, faces dont lie; these muslce clues, in the FACS, are sometimes used to spot when a \"smiling\" politican or celebrity isnt being truthful.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear senator i think that we should cape the electoral college process because, if it is not broken don't fix it. Also this process is a part of our founding fathers history it was established to compromise between election of the president. Thats way we should cape the electoral college process.\n\nThe electoral college has 538 electors but the president needs to have 270 electoral votes to become the president. The 23 amendment of the contitution allows columbia 3 electors and treated like a state for purpose of the electoral college. When you vote for your candidate you are actually voting for your candidates electors. Every candidate running for president in your state has his or her own goup of electors. Some states have a winner take all system, which gives all the electors a award to the winning presidential candidate.\n\nAfter the presidential election the governor prepares a \"certificate of ascertainment\" listing the candidates who ran for president. The certificate of ascertainment declares the winning presidential candidate in my state will represent your state at the meeting of electors. Abolishing the electoral college no said Bob Dole and Jimmy Carter they agreed. They are not alone according to a Gallup poll in 2000 taken after Al Gore thanks to the quirks of the electoral college won the popular vote but lost the presidency over 60% of voters would prefer a direct election to the kind we have now.\n\nThe electoral college avoids the problem of elections in which no candidate receives a majority of the votes cast. There is pressure for running off election when no candidate wins a majority of the votes cast that pressure which would complicate the presidential election process is reduced by the electoral college which produces a clear winner. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus, the second planet closest to the sun; scientists speculate it have once had life just like our planet earth. The author supports the idea to pursuit studying the planet Venus despite all the dangers. If we decide to study Venus we can find out what type of life the planet once had, solar power would be valuable to use and we could even find a way to live on the planet.\n\nVenus, earth's sister planet is currently inhospitable for humans. but in paragraph 6 it says, \"Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.\" Venus would have at one point in time had life living on it. That is why Astronomers are interested in studying it to learn what type of life lived on Venus and why they are gone. The author is intrigued by his imagination to know what type of creatures or plants that once belonged to this planet but are now gone due to the extreme weather conditions.\n\nThe hot fiery climate on Venus can also be incredibly useful. Using it for solar power could change the way we use energy completly. Venus being the hottest planet in the solar system paragraph 3 it states, \"On the planets surface, temperatures average over 800 degrees Fahrenheit.\" using solar power on venus would be important for Earth since its a renewable source and Earth runs on mostly unrenewable sources which will one day disappear off the face of the earth.\n\nIn paragraph 5, the author states that NASA has an idea for sending humans to study Venus. Using a vehicle similar to a blimp it would hover the planet 30 miles above the surface. With this idea temperatures would drop drastically toa a whopping 170 degrees fahrenheit. Air pressure and radiation levels would be similar to earth conditions making it survivable for humans. The author includes this because he wants to make it clesr that exploration on venus is possible. Innovation is key to exploring new places outside of our reach.\n\nThe author supports his claim on exploring Venus despite the risks it could cause. He does so by stating positive effects of exploration throughout the text. Exploration of our sister planet Venus is vital to human survival. With global warming, extinction, and unrenewable resources we need to find a suitable planet to get materials and maybe even call home. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Luke really liked his job as a sea going cowboy.In the passage you can tell he likes his job very much.There were 335 horses on that boat plus all the oat's to feed them for the trip.Can you imagen having to load all that.That must have been alot of work to have to get all the oat's up from the bottom of the ladder. But don't get me wrong he had lot's of time to do stuff like games .\n\nIn the passage it even say's he had a tennis tournemt.He must had really liked it because he rode the trip 9 times.One night they put him as the night watch and he slide down the ladder but luckly there was a pice of metal hanging out and his shirt got stuck on it so that kind of helped the fall a little.But don't think he didn't get hurt cause he did he had a couple broken rib's so he couldn't work any more that week.He could have also been put in the war but since he was already a seagoing cowboy they let him keep doing his job insted of putting him in the war.that was preaty nice of them to let him keep his job.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Believe of Driverless Cars\n\nDo you believe that it is best to use driverless cars in our country today. Yes, I believe that if we use drivreless cars today in our country it will be more safer than just manual driving. The reason I say that is because people in our generation today is distract by every thing they see, but machine don't get distract by nothing. This is why driveles cars are safer than manual driving.\n\nDriverless cars are also more useful, by give the driver opportunity to do things in the car. Like if the drive have kids they can tend to their child while the car drive by itself. Another reason it is more useful if your running late and you doing stuff to your hair or putting on make-up. The car can takeover while you do what ever you have to do. This is how the car is useful to the driver when the driver is busy with personal stuff they might be going through.\n\nDriverless cars are also better because you can program a place you want to go and you don't feel like driving you can just let the car drive for you. Or you want to travel to somewhere far and you feel sleepy. You can let the car keep driving until you wake up to drive yourself. This is how driverless cars is better than manual driving. You don't have to stop every time you feel sleepy and you can get there at a nice pace in time.\n\nAnother reason why\n\ndriverless cars are better is because they will be program with google, so you can know where your going and don't have to continue stopping to look at a map every hour or have to follow signs. The car will do everything for you. This is how driverless cars are much better then other cars. Plus they are more advance then regular cars and are much better. This is how we make our country more safer today in this generation.\n\nIn conclusion, driverless cars are made to protect humans while they are driving. Driverless cars can make a diffence that everyone will love. Everyone just have to be smart and make this work for the better. There will be less crashes and fewer deaths in the world if we have driverless cars. This will also be great for the U.S.A. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Because Venus has all proprties that humans requied to inhabit.\n\nAlso, Venus had an extremely temperatures that humans can't survived.\n\nAs the author said \"the temperature of Venus pass the 170 degress fahrentheid\", this means that humans can't resist this temperatures.\n\nYears ago scientist fund something interesting in Venus but also dangereous, venus can be inhabit???, how we can travel to Venus???\n\nAlso the Nasa do programs to send people to Venus and study the ecosism.\n\nVenus the secund planet of the solar sistem. Scientis fund that Venus maybe can be inhabit, because they fund properties that Earth posees. But now Venus is like pangea, a dangerous planet with dangerous gasees, earthquakes, etc.\n\nand now, the humanity want to know how to lived in Venus.\n\nVenus is a planet that we can study, survived etc. But also it take a lot of time to do programs and prepare the people, also we are close to put the first step on Venus.\n\nthank you....", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The aurthor of \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\" said in paragraph 1, they point out that Venus is sometimes calle the \"Evening Star\" because it is one of the brightest points of light in the nigth sky. Some people mistaken the names beacuse Venus is actually a planet. Venus is the second planet from the sun.\n\nIn paragraph 2 it says that Venus is considered Earth's \"twin\". They say that because they are simlar in shape and size. The one of the differences they have is speed. In paragraph 2 it also states that, \"because Venus is sometimes right around the corner - in space terms - humans have sent numerous spacecrafts to land on this cloud-draped world.\"\n\nIn paragrap 3 it says that, Venus has a thick atmoshpere of almost 97 persent and the layers are considered blankets. The clouds have highly corrosive sulfuric acid in the atmosphere. The temperatures range up to 800 degrees fahrenhiet. The atmospheric pressure is 90 times greater than what we are used to. The pressure from that would crush a submarine accustomed to diving in the deepest partof the ocean.\n\nIn paragraph 4 that they don't quite understand why they are studing \"our sister planet\". The aurthor states that the planet Venus is \"inhospitable\" and he/she want to know why Scientists are even discussing going back. The aurthor also state in paragraph 4 that they don't understand why Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because the author think the reason is that because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. They also state in pararaph 4 that they think that Venus was once \"covered largely with oceans\". That it couldv'e supported various forms of life like Earth does. They state that Venus has some features that life couldv'e been on it.\n\nIn paragraph 5, it says that NASA is thinking about sending human to Venus. They have invented a spacecraft that can travel on the fray on the outside of Venus. They think that it will work so it avoyeds all the storms and other conditions that is happening on the planet. They say that the temperature wil still be toasty around 170 degrees fahrenheit.\n\nEverything in these 5 paragraphs that I have listed are reasons why pursuiting to Venus is very dangers.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that using the Facial Action Coding System in schools is a great idea.\n\nTeachers always want to know if you understand the lessons and objectives they are teaching you.\n\nIf you're anything like me then you will just act like you know what's going on because you don't want to ask any questions.\n\nThe use of the Facial Action Coding System in classes would be valuable because it would help show the teachers if the students understand what they are being taught, it would help the students understand eachothers emotions, and since most schools have technology the system could show how they are feeling on their devices as well.\n\nIf teachers had the Facial Action Coding System device on hand they could easily see how the students are feeling about a particular lesson.\n\nThis would work well for the students that don't share their opinions in the classroom or at all.\n\nIf students did not understand a lesson the emotion reading device could show the teacher how the students are feeling.\n\nIf the device shows students are confused or bored, the teacher could modify the lesson to better the students and increase their knowledge capacity and possibly make it more entertaining.\n\nThe technology could also help the teenagers express how they truly feel because some teenagers are hard to read.\n\nSome teens, like myself, have a resting face that makes me look angry at the world and unapproachable.\n\nI think a device like this would show that some peers are not as angry or upset as their resting face shows.\n\nAlso, most communication takes place over technology nowadays.\n\nPersonally, my school has laptops and I think it would be great if the software was on our devices because emotions play a huge role in everyone's lives.\n\nThis software would also help numerous school guidance counselors across the globe because they deal with all sorts of emotions everyday.\n\nI know some of my peers do not enjoy sharing emotions or their opinions on certain situations with people they are not familiar with, and I am the exact same way, but if you are in harms way and still will not express what is going on then this device would be exremely helpful.\n\nThe technology has the intelligence to identify mixed emtions which is helpful because most people have trouble percieving facial traits and expressions.\n\nIf my school had this software, I would be all over it trying to find out how I feel because sometimes I don't even know my own emotions.\n\nThe use of the Facial Action Coding System in classes would be valuable because it would help show the teachers if the students understand what they are being taught, it would help the students understand eachothers emotions, and since most schools have technology the system could show how they are feeling on their devices as well.\n\nI think using the Facial Action Coding System software on our school computers is brilliant idea, and I personally think my peers would test it out in a heartbeat.\n\nThere are numerous benefits and positive outcomes from using this software in a classroom. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "My position on driverless cars are strong, because people who have\n\ndisabilities and need to go somewhere and don't have a driver, can use a driverless car to take them to their destination. Also a lot of acceidents are cause by drunk drivers or beginner drivers or people are killed in a hit and run. and some die because either they are not careful. This driverless car can change everything and make roads safer (Paragraph 3 & 9)\n\nThe idea of the driverless car is to form public transportation system where fleets of driverless cars form a public-transport taxi system and offer far more flexibility than a bus (Paragraph 1) also Some manufacturers hopeto do that by bringing in-car entertainment and information system that uses heads-up display. Such as displays can be turned off instantly when the driver needs to take over(Paragraph 8).\n\nThe conclusion is that what happens if the car fails and cause an accident is it the drivers fault or the manufacturer (Paragraph 9) ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the passage, many examples were given why Venus is so dangerous to study. Even though the neighboring planet may very dangerous to study, the author supports the idea that Venus is a worthy pursuit by describing the reasons why scientists would want to study the planet, and the different ideas that were created to help scientists gain more information.\n\nThe author has given many examples of how Earth and Venus are alike. In paragraph 4, it stated, ¨Astronomers are fascinated by Venus because it may well once have been the most Earth-like planet in our solar system. Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported carious forms of life, just like Earth.¨ Scientists would want to study Venus because there may be forms of life on Venus that no one might know about. The paragraph also stated, ¨Today, Venus still has some features that are analogous to those on Earth. The planet has a surface of rocky sediment and icludes familiar features such as valleys, mountains, and craters.¨ Not only does Venus may have different forms of life, but the planet also has features that planet Earth has as well. Scientist would want to study more to see how those formed and how that might lead into more information about the planet. Paragraph 4 also mentioned, ¨Futhermore, recall that Venus can sometimes be our nearest option for a planetary visit, a crucial consideration given the long time frams of space travel.¨ During different times, Mars and Venus can be closer to Earth. Scientists are already studying Mars, and with Venus being so close, they would also want to study it too. For the planet being so close, it would not take that much time to travel.\n\nThe author of the excerpt has also given information of how the scientists could reach their destination, Venus. In paragraph 5, it said, ¨NASA´s possible solution to the hostile conditions on the surface of Venus would allow scientists to float above the fray...Just as our jet airplanes travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms, a vehicle hover Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and out of their way.¨ This is an idea of how scientists could study Venus. The author also compared the technology that people have down on earth can help create a solution to get up in space to study. With hovering over the planet, temperatures would ¨still be toasty at around 170 degrees Fahrenheit¨ as stated in paragraph 5, the pressure would not be as bad. The pressure ¨would be close to that of sea level on Earth.¨ Even though the conditions are still not that great, the survival rate of humans going to Venus would be higher.\n\nThe author also gave other examples of how people can study Venus. In paragraph 7, it said, ¨NASA is working on other approaches to studying Venus. For example, some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the choas of Venus´s surface and have lasted for three weeks in such conditions.¨ The author of the excerpt is explaining that NASA has tested an idea that may work out for research of the planet due to the conditions. With the silicon carbide electronics, they may be able to help gather information without burning up right when it reaches to Venus. The paragraph also mentioned, ¨Another project is looking back to an old technology called mechanical computers.¨ The reason that they would use old technology because it deals with older materials, levers and gears. Modern technology would be more delicate in space. The author also mentioned, ¨By comparison, systems that use machanical parts can be made more resistant to pressure, heat, and other forces.¨ The author explained why using older technology would help with the other project the scientists are working on rather than using modern technology.\n\nWith the challenges of the pressure, heat, and other factors that Venus has, the planet is still worth studying. The author have put it into perspective that even though things may be challenging, there are ways to accomplish what the people want. By explaining how Venus is compared to Earth, it will put more determination of gathering information about Venus that no one has figured out before. The different ideas of how people can get up to Venus is another way to present why Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it has. With the dangerous factors that scientists face with Venus, it is still a planet in the sky that is worth studying. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Since the time of its discovery, the \"Face on Mars\" has baffled many people. Its resemblance to a face has caused it to gain much popularity, which has even led to a movie being made about it. Unfortunately though, there are people that would like to believe the Face is a sign of alien life on Mars. They have named and stated a number of arguments about why it is a sign, and even have claimed NASA is hiding it from the public. This is not true however, as the Face is simply just a peculiar looking landform. Yet, several counter-arguments and points must be made to drive home the fact that the face is just a landform.\n\nMany theories that the Face is a sign of alien life on Mars have been spawned by the creation of books, magazines, and even movies that have been made about it. Almost all of the stories these things tell about the Face are science fiction, with a key emphasis on the \"fiction\" part. Sadly though, some people have chosen to accept these ideas made by an author or producer as the truth. Most of the theories about the Face were made for good stories to the people, so that their books and magazines would sell more. But, one must not forget the people who claim they have the scientifically correct reasoning behind why the Face is a sign of alien life on Mars.\n\nThe people who claim theories that aren't from commercialized stories regarding how the Face is a sign of alien life are a little more credible than the others, yet still can be easily proven wrong. This is because their main, and in many cases only, argument centers around a 1976 photograph of the Face. When another photograph was taken in 1998 however, the picture showed that it was simply just a landform. One counter-argument to this is that the camera must've malfunctioned or the picture wasn't clear enough, in which there is one fact that makes that counter-argument dissolve. The camera in 1998 reportedly \"snapped a picture ten times sharper than the original Viking photos.\", which would lead to the assumption that the 1976 photo wasn't clear. If that's true, then the \"Face on Mars\" actually isn't a Face at all. Simply put, the Face is a natural Martian landform.\n\nIn conclusion, the \"Face on Mars\" is certainly an interesting landform, but is in no case a sign of alien life on Mars. All theories about how it's a sign of aliens have been swiftly and easily disproven, and has been further proven through updated pictures that it is just a landform. Even though finding a sign of alien life would have been more interesting, one must always stick to the facts to know the correct solution. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "If there is one thing this country has, it is the will to always come up with new ideas to make objects better. In this case, it is to improve cars. Many people may believe that the idea of a \"self-driving car\" is insane, but I believe it is possible. Driverless cars are coming, and will be here sooner than we know it.\n\nDriverless cars look like any ordinary vehicle. What is on the inside of this car is what counts and makes this vehicle so special. The cofounder of Google, Sergey Brin, states, \"The cars he foresees would use half the fuel of today's taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus.\" This is a wonderful concept when it comes to the struggle of finances and affording gas money. It is also healthy for the ecosystem. Since there is not a ton of fuel in use, the fumes that are let into the air are not as bad. These cars could change and are safe for the world.\n\nPeople around the world might be confused on what exactly a driverless car is; hence why they would be skeptical of this new idea. The driverless car has set out to be a car that takes over the resposibilities of the road for you. According to the prompt, \"Telsa has projected a 2016 release for a car capable of driving on autopilot 90 percent of the time. Mercedes-Benz, Audi, and Nissan plan to have cars that can drive themselves by 2020.\" These promises to improve the cars will be a start to a better life.\n\nThere are many reasons and proof as to why this plan could actually work. \"Google's modified Toyota Prius uses position-estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS receiver, and an inertial motion sensor. The most important bit of technology in this system is the spinning sensor on the roof. Dubbed LIDAR, it uses laser beams to form a constantly updating3-D model of the car's surroundings. The combination of all this input is necessary for the driverless car to mimic the skill of a human at the wheel.\" According to this passage in the prompt, that has already been figured out. If there are skeptics about safety, it states, \"In the 1980's, automakers used speed sensors at the wheels int the creation of antilock brakes. Within 10 years, those sensors had become more advanced to detect and respond to the danger of out-of-control skids or rollovers.\" All of the fears one may have with this new creation has already or is being worked out.\n\nDriverless cars are making progress and they are coming. There is still work to be done on this impressive idea, but that is why it was estimated for the future. With everything the companies have created so far, there is no doubt that they will accomplish this task in time. They are changing the world, taking one step at a time. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "\"Hello Mr. Fulkerson.\" I said, Mr. Fulkerson was a very stern and witty man. He would always be very strict with what is alowed and what isn't, But he loved people, he would always play or say hi to kids at the park, random kids that he didn't even know. Since he loved helping people so much I asked him to join the UNRRA. \"Hello Mr. Bomburger.\" said Mr. Fulkerson. \"So why am I here?\" \"you are here because I need to ask you something...\" \"umm...okay? what?\" \"well, you know how I'm working for the UNRRA?\" \"yea, what about it?\" \" I want you to join.\" Mr. Fulkerson looked shocked, like he had just been hit by lightning. Mr. Fulkerson answered \"But-but... why me?\"\n\nI was kind of confused. Wasn't it obvious? Did he not know? Was he joking? A million questions popped up in my head. Who did he think he was? \"well...you are very good with children and animals. You would be very good with this job.\" \"But I have a family I need to look out for. And my pet snake won't feed himself. Everyone who lives wiht me is afraid of snakes. They won't dare go near him!\" \"Just hire someone who will go near him.\" I said \"but what about the yard, it grows like my daughters hair!\" he said worried \"you can just pay that kid across the street to cut it. The UNRRA is a great orginazation. You would be happy and forget about everything at home, it would give you time to just relax once.\" \"yea, I guess your right.\" he responded \"On the bright side! It must already be a hassle trying to clean all of the dishes.\" \"actually Mrs. Fulkerson does those. I just cut the lawn and clean the bathrooms.\" said Mr. Fulkerson \"still, you wouldn't have to worry about anything else happening, you could just help people, because thats what you like to do.\" \"yeah I guess so.\" \" we could really use your help.\" \"our other lookout kind of fell overboard the ship...\" Mr. Fulkerson looked worried. \"Just kidding!\" Relief quickly brushed upon his face. \"The lookout had to go back home, his wife got in a car wreck, all we need is a replacement for a few days until he gets back.\" \"umm... ok,but when and where is it?\" \"on washington street in new york at 6:00 pm. meet us there to talk about it.\" I said", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear state senator,\n\nWe all are here today to right a letter to argue in favor of keeping the Electoral college, or changing to election by popular vote for the president of the united states. The Elector College process consists of the selection of the Electors, the meeting of the Electors where they vote for the president and vice president, and the counting of the electoral votes by congress. It consists of 538 electors 270 elector votes is requiredto elect the president.\n\nSo? witch one do I think is the best. I agree to keep the Elector College because things are running ok for now but it think the the people of the United States should have a little more say so in the disitions made in america because we are the american peopele and we have the right to speak are mind, and if we dont think somthing is a good idea we should be able to tell the congrees we dont belive in that and choice somthing eles that more people agree on. The only thing i see wrong with every one getting to have a say so is that not every one agrees with one another.\n\nI do agree that a bigger population shold get more elector votes but i dont thing it i far but it is what it is and i dont have a say so im ok with it. the only thing i have to say is its not right that the bigger populated states get the most etention they are the most important but i dont feel its right all states should be equal no mater there population size.\n\nI dont think that they shold change the Election of popularity because instead of voting for the right thing we could just vote for the presedent that is offering the best stuff, and when presedents promise us stuff it dosent alwasy men there going to keep that promise. they keep promises to every one and they cant keep a promise to one person with out breaking that promis to another person. like i sai i think the elector college should just stay the same way as it is with thoughs little changes because it is working. but things stop working at some point and when that time comes we will need a new system. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Venus is the closest planet to being like earth and its amazed scientists for years and now we will learn a little more about venus.\n\nNASA has one particular compelling idea for sending humans to study venus.They want to send a vehicle up and orbit venus think of it as a blimp-like vehicle hovering 30 miles give or take above venus yes it would still be very hot but the solar power would be plentiful and radiation would not exceed earths levels its gonna be rough conditions but it is survivable for humans.\"Our travels on earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and inovation. He's saying that we should not stop because we fear death we should push through no matter what happens we shouldnt let our fears get into the way of the future for mankind for earth.\n\nNASA wants to launch it up there and they will so that is all.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Often times I go to seventh period looking at my classmates and see only blank expressions. Like me, they're tired after an enitire day. It is difficult to tell how they are feeling and what are they thinking. I am positive that my teacher struggles with the same issues. She often says things simiilar to \"Use the next 30 minutes to get 2 or 3 problems done\". I don't blame her for the class's lack of enthusiasm. But now shift to the middle of the day, where people have the most energy. Mixed emotions appear, as well as mixed facial expressions. How can a teacher effectively teach if he/she is unclear what students are thinking? In Nick D'Alto's \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\", D'Alto discusses using technological advancements in facial recognition to detect exactly how people are feeling. If a classroom uses technologically assisted facial recognition, one would see the following three benefits to a learning environment: more focused education, increased collaboration with students, and creating a safer learning environment.\n\nIn \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\", D'Alto' cites Dr. Thomas Huang, a professor at the University of Illinois. Dr. Huang predicts that \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.\" In the first case where a student becomes confused, the teacher now knows what concepts the student is struggling with. This is a major advantage to the traditional school setting. In many of my past experiences helping fellow students, I have found it beneficial to know more about the student. I could relate better to the student, and better predict what could be a possible weakness. With a computer more accurately assting the teacher, the teacher can better address the weaknesses of the class or student. Since the primary goal of the educator is to educate to prepare students for the future, a computer assisted classroom would benefit the teacher in spotting weaknesses. In the latter example where the student becomes bored, a computer would spot a student who is not paying attention. The teacher, who often teaches a class of over 20 students cannot detect a bored face as easily. By focusing on a student who has mentally shut down, the teacher could potentially take disciplinary action, or quickly wake up the student such that the student misses less material that was taught. In both cases, a computer assisted classroom would bring a more focused education to students.\n\nDr. Huang goes on to predict that the computer \"could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" This would relate back to the first example made. By creating a more focused curriculum, teachers can collaborate better with students. It is rarely possible, perhaps even impossible, to teach a class without proper collaboration and communication between teacher and student. By collaborating with students on a more individualized level, the student receives help and education directed at his/her needs. I look back at my personal experiences, where I have needed help on one particular topic. For example, there was a point in my AP Physics class that I needed a detailed explanation of a topic, and I stayed after class to talk with my teacher specifically. Such a computer assisted classroom could help teachers and students alike receive better collaboration, further leading to a better education.\n\nFinally, it is necessary to note the main point of D'Alto's work. His main argument is that computers can help understand the way humans feel. Additionally, a computer can carry out raw calculations millions of times faster than humans can. With the recent events involving gun violence in Ohio, Kentucky, and Florida, it is critical to ensure the safety of the students. At my school, staff now glance over each student entering the building, looking for possible weapons. If a computer assisted school patrolled the doors looking for signs of anxiety, anger, depression, or any emotion that may show signs of intent to harm, a faster response could be delivered before any event occurs. For a long duration of time, the Columbine shooters had displayed emotions of intent to harm. If Columbine High School was assisted with this type of computer technology, perhaps the threats would have been neutralized before fifteen lives were lost. With the help of a speedy computer scanning through hundreds of emotions every day, it would better protect students attending that school. This would contribute to a safer learning environment for students, which further presses the need for this technology in schools, especially in today's society.\n\nTo wrap things up, it ought to be clear that this new facial recognition technology has many benefits to schools. Perhaps the only disadvantage would be the cost; however the benefits clearly outweigh the cost. Nick D'Alto's article discussed the techniques of using such a technology, and these techniques benefit the school setting greatly. After analyzing the examples presented, such technology used in schools would provide more focused education, increased collaboration with students, and a safer learning environment, all of which are advantage to schools seeking to provide the best education for the future generation.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Although driverless cars seem unfathomable today, it is likely that they'll be present in the near future. The article \"Driverless Cars Are Coming\" describes how we see autonomous features in many of the cars that exist presently and advanced development is already underway to fully automate all cars. Based on what I've read in this article, I believe that driverless cars should be available for practical uses because it would be the next chapter in modern automobile history, their safety advantages, and their ability to improve the effiency of society.\n\nCars have been progressing and advancing ever since they were created in the early twentieth century. As stated in the article, the gradual improvements of\n\ncomputer hardware and sensors have made cars safer and easier to drive. The advances that allowed automakers to utilize speed sensors in the creation of antilock brakes are leading to the many advantages that would be seen in autonomous vehicles. Cars that are able to drive themselves make perfect sense considering the technological advances we see in many of modern society's aspects. Driverless cars would just be the correct and next step toward in the history of the automobile.\n\nNot only would fully autonomous cars be historic, they would be much safer than any of today's vehicles. We see features of a driverless car in many of today's automobiles. They'd be similar to the BMW's \"Traffic Jam Assistant\" or how drivers' seats in GM cars vibrate when there is danger of backing into objects. Although the cars that include these features cannot fully take over for the driver, they're sort of what to expect when we actually see fully autonomous cars. The human brain simply cannot calculate and formulate a plan as quick as a computer can. Driverless cars would prevent human mishaps error, drastically improving safety. Surely, autonomous cars will decrease the accident rates among drivers.\n\nDriverless cars would also bring about a more efficient society. According to the article, fully autonomous cars would be able to reduce gas consumption and improve public transportation. They'd be as simple as calling for a taxi, but they'd be without the hassle of bus or subway stations. These vehicles would also be as individual as one would prefer, preventing any unwanted intereaction with other humans. Instead of being crammed on a bus with people you don't know, you could have the peace of mind by yourself in a driverless car.\n\nIn conclusion, driverless cars would be great for society. Autonomous cars would be a logical next step in the automobile's history. They're much safer than any of today's cars, and much more efficient. Driverless cars would make the world a safer and better place to work and live.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author supports the claim in a very understandable factor. It plays a part in the story to inform you more knowledge about Venus.\n\nThe author is basically telling you what he knows, explaining the subject may be easy to read , but you wants you to understand it too. For example, when he said \"A thick atmosphere of 97 percent co2 blankets Venus.\" Then giving you an supporting detail to where you could understand the meanning of his statement. The author obviously studies a big part of his work to infrom and coclude with lots of details in the story , thats the great big meaning of the supporting detail and main message of the story.\n\nNow to conclude this paragraph , the author uses scientific purposes in the story to get his point across from. Using the knowledge he gave himself to under the the inform he was trying to do. Thats how the author supports the idea of studying Venus is worthy pursuit despite all the dangers. Thats the perfect example that fits along with my answer.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think using the technology Facial Coding System won't work trying to find out how a person is feeling because how could you know what a person is feeling unless you ask them, now I know that a person might be able to tell how your feeling by looking at you, but now we don't use technology to tell how a person's feeling we just look at their facial expressions to tell if their happy, sad, mad, frustrated, or any emotion that their feeling I think we can only tell by looking at their facial expression, they said that by looking at the painting of Mona Lisa that they could tell that she was feeling 83 percent happy, 9 percent, disgusted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 perent angry, now you would never know if she's happy, fearful, disgusted, or angry unless you were with her at that time of the picture you would never know how she's feeling. Thats probably how she takes all of her pictures you never know, she could have been feeling sad, mad, fearful, or anything unless you were with her at that time of the painting andd she told you how she was feeling. In conclusion I don't think the Facial Coding System will work to tell how a person is feeling.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the passage \" The Challenge of Explorinng Venus \", the author belives that we should explore venus even if there are hazards. we should explore venus because it is the only planet that is a like twin,that we will gain insight on the planet,and that human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimadating endavors.\n\nvenus is one of planetary neighbors meanig that it is one of the closest planets to earth. Scientest often call venus our twin. In paragraph four,sentence 3 scientes also say that, \" Venus was probaly covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.\" With this being said they could moniter venus and get it running like how it use to be if we can we can get up there and be there long enough. If we are able to do that Scientest could probaly move life over to Venus.\n\nIf insight is gained over Venus we could create new life or even move life over to Venus. With the right technology we could create a habitat that we can live on. If we did acomplish thus our life could change forever. We could reduce the amount of poultion, control the population, and if ever needed we could move to a diffrent planet. With posibiltes like this we could change our life and how we would live forever. This could embark ideads of us going to mars and trying the same thing.\n\nIf we did this it could show that we can make other planets an enviorment that we could live on. Such as mars and other palnets. Pepole would be inspired to colonize another planet. Mars also as earth like features you can grow props there and do many other things. With great minds on the project anything is posible.\n\nin conclusion, with the thought of exploreing venus because it is the only planet that is a like twin,that we will gain insight on the planet,and that human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimadating endavors. Are all valid points because if all these things are posible than anything is posible within our planet and with outher planets.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use of the Facial Action Coding System to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is not valuable. There are many ways that this can and cannot work. It would be great to have the students potentially have the best classroom experience possible, but that is not always the case. The system is a great idea, but it may not work for everyone. After all, it is technology, so it is not guaranteed to work one hundred percent of the time.\n\nMany things can go wrong with the FACS. Not everyone has the same shape of face or the same shape of muscle in their face, so can it really tell the exact emotions of everybody? Computers are great things in our world, but they do not always work the way you would want them to. This software would most likely have bugs and glitches for a while before they even come close to perfecting it. Many things can go wrong.\n\nThe article states that humans perform these \"calculations\" everyday. Why do we need a computer to calculate our emotions when students can go to a classroom and have an actual human teacher? The article provides much great and helpful information and pros to this software. Logically thinking, people can come to the conclusion that they do not need a computer software such as the FACS to cope with their emotions. The FACS may be valuable to very few people.\n\nThe FACS is just showing how people are not developing the social skills they should have. In the article, Dr. Huand states, \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored, then it could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor\". Students should just go to class and have a real human teacher so they can ask them for help if they are confused or bored. Computers should not have human qualities that sounds ridiculous. Dr. Huang also never mentioned what the FACS would cost either, it could be hurting peoples' pocketbooks.\n\nThe use of the FACS to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is not valuable. As stated earlier in the essay this is what real humans are for. This is also coming from a high school student who does not take online classes. This software would not be much help to the students who go into school everyday and see real life teachers and not computers. Dr. Huang could have mentioned much more in this article, he focuses on all of the pros of the software but none of the cons. The article is quite biased and its purpose is to hype students up for a cool new software. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear State Senator,\n\nI believe that we should change the electoral college to election to popular vote for the president of the United States. The electoral college is in no way fit to be the basis of how we choose the president of the United States. This country was based of of popular soverignty and we should keep it the way that it always has been with all the decison makeing done be the people.\n\nThe electoral college is an overwhemingly unfair system to voters. The canidents will not spend any of their time in states they know will not win because of the winner take all system in each state. they only focus on the tight races and some of the states dont even get to see the campaign ads. Some of the states did not even see the candidates at all. The electoral college is essentially one of the most unfair things in the prospect that the candidates dont spend time in the states that they dont think will win and the states that they know wont win are not even privillaged enough to see the campaign ads.\n\nIn addition to being unfair the electoral college can cause serious damage. The electoral college have the power to go against the will of the people. Back in the '60s segregationists in the Louisiana legislature were almost successful in replacing the Democratic electors with new electors who would not vote for John F. Kennedy. Also during that time some electors would occasionally vote for whomever they please and not vote for their party's candidate. If the electoral college were to ever go into a tie it would be given to the House of Representatives. During this time the the states representatives will be cating thier votes on behalf of thier state. The problem with that is that those representatives are voting on behalf of thier entire state and that means they are voting for who they want and acting like that it is something the entire state wants.\n\nThere are five \"offical\" benifits of having the electoral college. The benifits are certainty of outcome, everyone's president, swing states, big states, and you avoid run-off election. All of these things are in fact true but what if you are willing to risk all of that just to be able to be the one who has a say in who becomes president. I know that they kind of do but in reality that does not really mean much if there is someone who is going to completly disregard my vote and do whatever he feels like doing. I know that all of those five benifits are important but isnt my right to have a say in whose president important as well?\n\nSenator, the reason for my letter is that I want to have a say in who the president is going to be and the electoral college resticts that. I believe that the president of the United States should be elected by popular vote because this is America and in America we do what the people want and the people want change. We want the electoral college out and popular vote in.\n\nSincerely,\n\nA concerned citizen ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Maddie was having the worst day possible. She was late to school, her hair was not cooperating, and she forgot her homework at home. She walked, sullen, into first hour late. Figuring it had been a rough morning, her teacher gave a sympathetic glance to Jenna and graciously gave her the coveted backrow seat. Maddie turned for a moment to look at her friend Jenna, giving her a look that said it all. No explanation required, Jenna knew something was up with Maddie. Can you imagine if there was a time where you didn't need to know \"what was up with Maddie\" just by looking at her? What if there was a computer that told you, \"Maddie is feeling 68% stressed and 22% angry and 10% sad.\" Wouldn't that be odd? Do you really need a computer to tell you all that, or can you figure that out by yourself, just by the look on her face? This computer is potentially going to make a debut in the classroom, and it's really not needed. Using a computer to read students' emotions is a piece of technology that is not necessary for the classroom envioronment because you don't need a computer to tell what a student is feeling, some students will missuse this technology, and we don't always need to comply to what the student wants based on their emotions the computer is telling.\n\nA first and important reason against these computers in a classroom is that\n\nthere is no real reason to have it in there; humans were made to be empathetic people, reading other's emotions is a basic skill everyone has. In the story earlier, both the teacher and Jenna were able to figure out quickly that Maddie was having a hectic morning, and responded in the appropriate way. They didn't need a computer to tell them that. As it states in the article, Making Mona Lisa Smile, \"For instance, you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by a look on their face.\" This article just dug itself into a hole here. This article is about all the possibilities of an emotion reading computer, and right here it says that people can read each other just fine! In a classroom, a teacher must be the one who knows their class and how they respond to different activities and subjects, not the computer knowing. In a classroom, the student must know how their classmates are feeling, not the computer knowing. In a classroom, this computer is not needed becuase it's a valuable skill to be able to decipher through emotions.\n\nAlong with being able to figure out other's emotions, this computer is not necessary in a classroom becuase it is an open window for students to missuse this. Think about it. There is an object in your classroom that can tell exactly what everyone is feeling in a moment. There will be people who missuse this power. All over the news, there are always stories of people fighting against bullys and finding ways to stop them. Well, what does a bully like to do? Get into other people's heads. If the bully knows exactly what their victim is feeling, that kid is toast. That bully will immediately know all their weak spots, their likes, dislikes, anything and everything that could be used against them. This computer can be horribly missused, and it could cause problems throughout the class.\n\nAlong with the missuse of power, there can be the absence of power with this machine also. When speaking about the absence of power, its about the teacher. The whole use of the comuputer for the teacher is supposed to be so that, when their students are bored, they can change the lesson plan. But, here's the thing. If you let your students' emotions control what you teach, eventually the techer loses all their power, and the computer gains all of it. For example, the teacher is giving a lesson, and all the students are absolutely bored out of their minds. This computer will pick up on it and tell the teacher that \"your students are 100% bored with your lesson\". (DO YOU REALLY THINK THE TEACHER DOESN'T KNOW THAT??) Not only that, but say the students catch wind of this computer's \"valuable\" information it just gave out. There's always that one student who just can't keep their mouth shut. \"Mrs. Smith! We're all 100% bored so lets change the lesson!\" To which the rest of the students chime in and agree enthusiasticlly. Suddenly, the whole class is distracted, and when Mrs. Smith starts her lesson again, she will never have full controll of the classroom again. You see, the computer is all about complying to the students emotions. It sounds nice to take other people's emotions into consideration, but sometimes it goes too far. If you're the teacher giving the lesson, it has to get done whether your class is super pumped or super bored. That's what school is about. It can't always be exciting, and you can't always baby your students by giving them everything they want. This computer causes less classroom control, and that's stressful for a teacher.\n\nAn emotion-telling computer is not needed to be placed in a classroom because the teacher should be able to tell how their students are feeling, the students shouldn't be able to have that much power, and the teacher still needs to have that power in the classroom. When a computer comes into the classroom, it can cause many problems and is rather useless. Can you imagine a time where you don't need to know how your friends are feeling, because a computer can do it for you? Why use a computer when you can use a better object, your brain?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Facial Action Coding System would work on students in a classroom.\n\nThe fact that the muscles for emotions are universal help prove the theory that it would work on a class of students. Dr. Huang points says that the new emotion-recognition software will track the facial movements. He says \"the facial expressions for each emotion are universal, even though individuals often show varying degrees of expression. This shows that the software would be able to show the emotions of everybody. It also shows that it would work on a class of students because they will all have the same way of feeling an emotion.\n\nHumans can tell people's emotion just by looking at them. People can look at people they know and can tell some of the emotions that they have. Dr. Huang's new sofware stores similar anatomical information as electronic code. It shows that computers can do what people can do with some programing. It also help prove that a computer can tell what a class of students can feel because of the programing that the computer has.\n\nA regular PC can't hadle the complex stuff that a big computer could. This shows that it would take a lot more power in order to do, so it would take a lot of time in order to make sure it would work. \"Your home PC can't handle the complex algorithms used to decode Mona Lisa's smile\" says Nick D'Alto. This shows that it is more complex and it would take experts who know what they are doing just for it to run. It shows that if an expert is running the operation than the computer could read the emotions of an entire classroom of students.\n\nThe Facial Action Coding Sytem would work on a classroom of studens because of the fact that the muscles in order to make an emotion are universal, humans can tell what someone is felling so they could program a computer to do the same, and a regular PC wouldn't be able to handle it which would mean that it is a big program that takes people who know what they are doing to handle it properly.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In a couple of years, cars completely controlled by humans will be outdated. There are positive arguments and negative arguments about driverless cars. I am for positive cars for multiple reasons.\n\nMy first reason that driverless cars are a good idea involves drunk driving. If a preson is drunk and trys to drive somewhere but can not concentrate, he will not be able to drive the car. The text states, \"In fact, none of the cars developed so far are completely driverless. They can steer, accelerate, and brake themselves, but all are designed to notify the driver when the road requires human skills, such as navigation through work zones and around accidents\" (Driverless Cars are Coming 7). If a person is drunk and does not respond to the car's warnings, the car will not navigate through the work zone. This feature will elimate accidents caused by somebody who is drunk and is not able to properly function a car by himself.\n\nAnother reason why I am for driverless cars is car awareness. According to the text, \"Within 10 years, those sensors had become more advanced to detect and respond to the danger of out-of-control skids or rollovers. The information from the sensors can cause the car to apply brakes on individual wheels and reduce power from the engine, allowing far better response and control than a human driver could manage alone\" (Driverless Cars Are Coming 5). These sensors will completely eliminate blind spots. There are sensors all around the car that will warn it of a different car that is close to it. Many accidents are caused because somebody was going to change lanes on a road, but they did could not see the person that was in their blind spot.\n\nMy third reason that I am for driverless cars is that they have a gas milage that is twice as good as the cars that people drive today. One example from the text is, \"The cars he foresees would use half the fuel of today's taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus\" (Driverless Cars Are Coming 1). Not only will these cars have a better gas milage, but they will also be able to get to more places than a city bus would be able to go. If driverless cars were used instead of regular cars, the world would use half as much gasoline as it already does. That would mean that the world will be able to us gasoline for twice as long and it will take the world twice as long to run out.\n\nIn conclusion, I am for driverless cars. Driverless cars would be much safer on the roads than if humans were controlling cars. Many more lives would be saved if there were driverless cars, and much more gasoline would be saved for the future. Driverless cars will have a positive impact on the whole world.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I am against the development of these cars because those who own one would never know if the the car would stop working and will crash. Also waiting fo the driver to take its part too when driving, Although having a driverless car would be dangerouse to those who own one and the community.\n\nHaving a driverless cars would be a good idea but can cause an acciendent. In the text, it states that, \"Still, even if traffic laws change, new laws will be needed in order to cover libability in the case of an accident.\" If those who owns a driverless car got into a acciendent the new law would have to order to cover the damage. Also by having a diverless car, if the car have stop functioning well, it would cause someone to get injured. An example from the text is, \"If tecnology fails and someone is injured, who is at fault-the driver or the manufacturer.\" Having that car, those wouldn't know who to blame. Driverless cars can cause problems so it wouldn't be a good idea owning one.\n\nThose who are thinking or has a driverless car can get into problems that they aren' aware of. Those people can cause an accident and can be dangerous to those around them and themselves. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "If we dont make a change now we, could be in a lot of trouble twenty years from now. Us as people dont really ever look at how much we actually are hurting the world and ourselves. For instance, limiting your car usage. That right there saves money for you and also helps keep our enviroiment clean and healthy.\n\nFirst of all, if you were to limit your car use from seven days a week to maybe three, you would be saving a ton of money. The avarage person probably fills there gas tank all the way up once a week. Depending on mile per gallon your car ges it could be different, but if you were to only use your car three days out of the week you would only have to fill your tank up about every two weeks instead of every weeks. You would save so much money if you were to do that. Gas prices arnt cheap in todays world, its not like you can go get a gallon of gas for 50 cents anymore.\n\nSecond of all, used gas contaminates our world almost more than anything. The feums that come out of cars/trucks is the reason why we are having the types of problems that we are having enviromental wise. In source 1: In German suburb, life goes on without cars, the people who live in Vauban Germany only get to use there car everyother day depending on licsence plate numbers. They're making a movement and it is called smart planning. This town along with others sees how bad we are hurting our enviroment and making a change. These people are getting along with there lives just fine, in fact some are saying that life is better without having a car. They say they are \"stress free.\" In source 2: Paris bans driving due to smog, it says that almost 4,000 drivers were fined, now i cam see were some days you just have to use your car to take car of somethimg and that is totally fine because thats what cars are used for, to benefit us.\n\nIn conclusion, i believe that us as people need to reallly think about the future and realize that we dont have to use our cars as much as we do today. We can take a couple of days out of the weeks and not use them it wont kill you. Infact it might make you live longer because you are helping your enviroment which is definitley helping you. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "About twenty five years ago, NASA was taking photos of the landing site for sister ship Viking 2 on Mars. This region they were taking photos on was called Cydonia. While taking the photos, they saw a big face like structure just on the surface of Mars. NASA soon found out it wasn't a real face, but a Martian mesa. They posted the image for the public to see thinking that it was cool and interesting. The public didn't think the same though. This brought up a lot of conspiracy theorists, and people went into a small panic.\n\nI am a scientist at NASA, and I can tell you that this little rumor of the Martian mesa found on Mars being a face that aliens created can be proven wrong. The first picture ever taken of this \"face\" was very blurry, and not clear enough to really tell what it was. So, on April 5, 1998 Michael Malin and his team got another picture. This picture was ten times sharper (better) than the original photos. These photos proved that the \"face\" was nothing other than a land form.\n\nOn April 8, 2001, they went to see the \"face\" again, due to the public still not believing NASA. They took a extraordinary photo on this trip of the \"face\". This photo proved that even if there was a bit of haze over Mars, if there were objects in the picture, you would be able to see it very clearly.\n\nAfter twenty five years of trying to prove to many people that this \"face\" wasn't built by aliens and that it was just a natural landform, some people still don't believe NASA. There are conspiracy theorists still to this day that just don't want to believe no matter how much evidence we give to the public. Martien mesas are common around the Cydonia, and if the landform was thought to be made from aliens, then NASA would intend to figure out what to do with it and how to keep citizens safe. Why would we hide this from you? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I recently read an article about driverless cars and the pros and cons about these driverless cars. I think that driverless cars should be used in the real world. Some reasons are because of the huge drop in fuel use that could occur when using driverless cars, how safer it'd be, and how easier accidents would be to deal with when a crash would occur.\n\nWhen you look at the facts on how the fuel economy is, you'd want to lower the amount of fuel driving takes. In this case, these driverless cars can do just that. Google founder Sergey Brin stated that not only would the cars he foresees being used in the future use half the fuel of todays taxis, but also have offer far more more flexibility than a bus. This is only one out of many reasons why driverless cars should be used more often.\n\nThe general goal of all car companies is to create the safest vehicle yet. Luckily, with driverless cars countless sensors and cameras, the driverless cars we may still see in the future may be the safest option yet. For example, Google's modified Toyota Prius uses position-estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS reciever, and an inertial motion sensor. The most important bit of technology in this system is the spinning sensor on the roof called LIDAR, which uses laser beams to form a constantly updating 3-D model of the car's surroundings. With all these sensors and cameras equipped, I think we could safely assume that these driverless cars will be the safest vehicle out there.\n\nNow finally, we come to the matter of what would happen in the sense of these driverless cars getting into accidents. The biggest question at the moment is who would be to blame? I think we can safely all agree that no matter how advanced driverless cars get, human will still be able to or have to be in control at some point while driving this type of car. That being said, why should the manufacturer be held responsible for someones reckless driving. Now sure some may say that the manufacturer should be held responsible due to the fact that their car may not be perfect. However, all vehicles aren't perfect, which means you can't hold the manufacturer responsible. This means that the driver would be held responsible.\n\nWe've discussed multiple reasons why driverless cars should be developed. Reasons including the massive fuel drop involved, how safer it'd be, and how easier the accidents would be to deal with. Sure, I may not have listed all the reasons, but these reasons should be enough for someone to understand why these driverless cars should be developed as soon as possible. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Face is just a natural landform because there is no real evidence that this \"face\" was created by an alien, and the \"face\" is too big to have been created by any lifeform. Scientists figured it was just another Martian mesa, but other people still believe that it was created by aliens that live live on Mars.\n\nThe Face is just another natural landform because it was just a huge rock formation that measured nearly two miles from end to end. The shapes of the Face were formed by shadows giving the illusion of eyes, nose, and mouth. Secondly, the Face is just too big and it would have too long to have been created by any lifeform. “We had to roll the spacecraft 25 degrees to center the Face in the field of view,” said Garvin. If they didn't have moved the spacecraft 25 degrees to center the face, they would never been able to take a good picture because it was so big. The Face on Mars was as big as a lava dome that takes the form of an isolated mesa. These mesas are common around the American West, and they look similar to the one that they found on Mars.\n\nThis is why the Face on Mars is actually just a natural landform that Mars created, and not an artifact that an alien created.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Everyone has different views about this topic. Some might agree with it and some might not, but this is about me so... I am for the development of this cars, I agree. This cars are the future of of our world. This cars will/are changing the way we see transportaton.\n\nI am for the development of this cars because in my opinion I think they are the future of tansportation. For years now, companies have made different things that help drivers alot, but imagine a car that drives it's self with no need for your help. Many accidents happen because of drivers. We have lost many innocent lives because there people who dont pay attenton when they are driving. Now theres cars that have sensors that detect heat around the vehicle just in case there something or someone around it and that way it will prevent an accident from happening.\n\nFor example as it say in the article, \"In 2013, BMW announced the development of \"Traffic Jam\". Traffic Jam takes control of the car up to 25 mph but it's not driverless along with many other cars. Self driving cars right now have prevented many accidents and have saved many lifes. They are not totally driverless but they do halp us alot.\n\nTechnoloy gets better and better everyday. Driverless cars are not far away. People make new things and figure out how to improve them everyday. Here in the United Staes alot of accidents are caused by impared drivers. For example if there was this one person drinking but he had to go home and the only way for him to get home was driving. If the persons car was driverless then he would get home safe without hurting any one.\n\nDriverless cars will change the future of transportation.\n\nThis is why I am in favor of driverless cars. I think they are very important and that we should pay more attention to them and try to make them happen. We could save many lives because there would be less accidents. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The use of this technology to read the emotional expressions of students in a classroom is valuable because it involves anything to communicate. Professor Thomas Huang and his colleague are experts at developing better ways for humans and computers to communicate.\n\nThe quote says, \"The process begins when the computer constructs a 3-D computer model of the face; all 44 major muscles in the model must move like human muscles. Movement of one or more muscles is called an \"action unit.\" Then Dr. Huang relies on the work of psychologists, such as Dr. Paul Eckman, creator of FACS (Facial Action Coding System).\"\n\nMost of the experts can identify how people feel about anything like bored, happy, and etc. \"Dr. Huang observes that artists such as da Vinci studied human anatomy to help them paint facial muscles precisely enough to convey specific emotions. His new computer software stores similar anatomical information as electronic code. Perhaps Dr. Huang's emotion algorithms are a different sort of Da Vinci Code!\" Most of the experts knows that faces don't lie. Only the muscles are easy to spot if some people are really \"smiling\" or something else. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In this generation, our planet is getting flithier and filthier by the day. What many people are too late to realize is that we are the main cause of our dirty planet. Cars contribute to air pollution a lot. What's the only solution to this smog filled atmosphere? There are many, but limiting car usage will definitely be beneficial and highly advantageous. Limiting car usage will help reduce air pollution significantly, and will even help humans out too.\n\nWe breathe the air in our atmosphere. When you notice that our atmosphere is as dirty as it is, you really don't want to think about what you are putting into your lungs. The amount of air pollution is an extreme amount, and if not controlled soon, we will be in danger. An advantage of limiting car usage would be that the air pollution will be benefitted, and will be getting lower hopefully. As Robert Duffer states Paris of having \" intesifying smog.\" That should be very concerning news and should be a clear wake up call. Limiting car usage is definitly something our planet needs to look into. A healthier atmospere is better than one filled with smog. The decrease of air pollution is just one of the many advantages of limiting car usage.\n\nLimiting car usage is also advantageous by taking away stress. Many people that drive all know what the pains are of being stuck in traffic. What if you don't wake up on time and you skip taking a shower, or skip eating breakfast, and speed as fast as you can to make it to work? It causes severe stress. From that point on in the day, you literally can't concentrate or focus and you just know it is going to be a rough day. Well, limiting car usage would take some stress away. See, super slow traffic , being late to work, skipping the most important meal of the day, it all just builds up into a lot of unneeded and unwanted stress. If people don't have to deal with congested highways, they could enjoy a nice walk to their job, or ride their bicycle. Doing this would instantly take away stress. \"It's a good opportunity to take away stress...\" says Carlos Arturo Plaza, a business man(Selsky). There are cities that have tried having a day with no cars. It has worked in taking away stress, as you can see. Taking a bike ride or walking instead of driving a car is also beneficial becasue it's exercise.\n\nLimting car use has its benefits. People should be aware of the growing danger of air pollution, and limitng car usage will help reduce the amount of pollution. Also, it helps in taking away stress and clearing minds. It is not a bad idea to start limiting our car usage, for we will receive the benefits of decreased car usage. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Many years ago, we invented the automobile. It was a huge breakthrough, that was heard around the world. Many people never even dreamed of getting from place to place without some sort of muscle. But today, vehicles are a huge help to our daily lives, but could the emissions be damaging them.\n\nOver the years car emissions have cause thick, gray, clouds to form over busy cities. This is called \"smog\". Many towns are reducing the amount of cars they let citizens use. In one case, Vauban, Germany, the streets are completely car free. The only place where vehicles are allowed is along the outskirts of the city. As much as 70 percent of Vauban's failies do not own cars, according to Elisabeth Rosenthal.\n\nIt was shown that passenger cars are the cause for up to 12 percent of greenhouse gases.\n\nMany cities have reduced the amout of vehicles they allow to be frequent on their streets. In Paris they had near records of pollution. They enforced a partial ban on driving to try and clear the air. If you were caught driving there was thirty one dollar fine you would have to pay. According to Robert Duffer almost 4000 drivers were fined. Many people did not like this idea of no vehicles. Eventually the smog cleared and they took the ban off of odd-numbered plates on cars.\n\nAs more and more communities are starting to rid of vehicles, pollutionn is starting to decrease. Though many people are not fond of the idea, they began to except the fact that life is possible without cars. Many communtities have made it easier for citizens to access the essentials they need to supports their families, such as grocery stores. In Vauban stores are being placed on a main street instead of on a highway.\n\nSome cities and communities are taking it to the next step in reducing pollution form automobiles. Recent studies have shown that less and less cars are being bought. The answer to help reduce pollution may not be just getting rid of cars, nut maybe using more electric cars. Some communities have taken this step of producing and using more environment safe vehicles. Though cars are a help in getting from point A to point B, they are a burden on the environment in emitting fumes that pollute the air. As many communities and towns are starting to find other means of transportation, the vehicle era may become exstinct. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear Mr or Mrs senator I think we should keep our method of choosing our state president. it more easier then any other method. Also it less time consuming.\n\nCollege voting method is the most easiest method to use. All we have to do is vote and who ever gets the most votes win. I think its just a fair method to use. I feel like the other method is just to complex so we should stick to the college voting method. almost half of the time to president we choose is the right president for the US.\n\nAnother reason we should keep the college method is because it wouldnt take that long. All we really just have to do is vote and in no time our president will be in office.\n\nin conclusion I think we should keep the college method because its less time consuming and its an easier process. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Do you wanna take care of horses,young cows,and mules? Well if you do,Join the Seagoing Cowboys in taking our adventure ot help people anad places bombed in World War ll.\n\nWhen Luke and Don were traveling over seas in the Seagoing Cowboys,They got their seaman's papers and boarded the SS Charles W. Wooster, Headed for Greece. The cargo was 335 horses and enough oats to feed all the horses.\n\nBefore arrivingt in Greece,Luke turned 18, Which back then meant that Luke could be drafted for military service.\n\nA couple years later he was discharged,Luke had made nine trips,The most of any Seagoing Cowboy ever. The cattle boat trips were an unbelieveable experience for Luke being a small town boy. Before helping anyone he had the benefit of seeing Europe and China. But Luke also got to see the Acropolis in Greece and taking a gondola ride in Venice,Itlay.\n\nLuke also toured at the evacuated castle in Crete and marveled at the Panama Canal on his way to China. It took two weeks to cross the Atlantic Ocean from the eastern United States and a month to China.\n\nCaring for the animals during the crossings kept Luke busy. They had to eat and give the animals water three times a day. Bales of hay and oats had to be pulled from the lower ship. The stalls had to be cleaned.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever heard of the 1976 image taking by the viking one known as the \"Face on Mars\" it is what spiked the eventual conspiracy that life does exist on other planets. but there is almost an overwhelming ammount of evidence that proves that the image is not a man-made structure.\n\nThe assumption that life exists on mars is false and because of this the face on mars is just a natural formation. The number one reason it looks like a face in the famous image is we were not using advanced cameras it was 1976 so, images often looked blurry or dark. for example in the intro to the article the last sentence states that 3D High Resolution cameras revealed that the face was only a mesa, but doesn't mean the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) did not use this image to excite would be people to inquire why it looks like that; thus increasing funding to there research. Even the location proves that this image is no more than a messa; for example in the second paragraph it is stated that the scientist at NASA believed it was just another messa as if to imply that messa ar common around the region called Cydonia.\n\nBecause NASA scientist had already publicly advertised the image, it had become a pop icon showing up in media format broadcasting as proof that aliens exist wich led citizens to believe that they did find aliens on Mars but were hiding evidence of the discovery, but this makes little sense if the discovery of inteligent life was shared NASA would benefit incredibly. First thing is Nasa would have a spike in funding allowing better equipment to be bought. The second thing is the American government would want to immediately want to set up relations with this race, so there is virtually no reason to hide information like that.\n\nAll conspiracy theorist believe that the face represented life on other planets but as Garvin said \"It looks like the Middle Buttle in Snake River Plain of Idaho.\" So This face is Actually a stone formation. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are very much within the reaches of modern technology. Companies such as Google have already started developing them and have working prototypes. Although the cars seem like they are a good idea they may bring new issues to light and may cause legal tension between companies and the law.\n\nThe Google car has been in production since 2009 and has since only been improving. Though most of the technology is still available for companies to produce a driverless car, they have yet to find out a way for users to be completly negated in the terms of the car navigating by itself There are cars that are to some degree, driverless, but they have to alert the users to take control of the automotive when there is complicated traffic or contruction in its pathway. Although the car can navigate regular traffic, it still needs the user to control it at times thus rendering it not completly \"driverless.\"\n\nThere is also the fact of the legality of the cars on the raod. By definition, a safe car dictated by law is \"one in complete control of a human being.\" This has presented an impass between the spread of driverless cars since most states don't allow for driverless cars to navegate their roads. Some states like California might help change that by it allowing the testing and use of driverless cars in its area. Although, if the cars do become prominent in the coming years. The governments will have to instate new laws that will define the legality of those cars in the terms of accidents. They will need to determine if the car is at fault during a crash or the user of the car. If the government favors the side in which the cars and their manufacturers are at fault, then this may lead to the downfall of driverless cars since companies don't want to be sued for their cars causing accidents. If the government sides with it being the users fault if in the case of an accident, then this may also lead to a dislike in the self-navigating cars since users don't want to risk having legal issues due to their car causing an accident that they could not control due to the car not being able to relinquish control to its user.\n\nWhilst the technology put into develpong the driverless cars is very facinating, the practicality and the safety of the cars can be put into question. First if they are ruled to be safe to take out on the road and secondly, whom is to blame if these vehicles happen to be in an accident. The only way to know if the cars will be accepted into society is to see the debate between the the legality and safety of these cars and to see what will people will want to be driving next.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Are driverless cars simply good or bad? You could argue either way, driverless cars are improving every year, but they are also cautious because its up to you to put your life on the line by letting the car drive you around. Driverless cars are not aproved in alot of states, simply because other states dont know whether to trust theses cars with traffic laws and etc. These cars are trying to be proven that can could make you driving experience easier and more safe.\n\nI believe this cars need more improvment, they seem to be very good technology but I wouldnt trust theses cars. Traffic laws are also stopping driverless cars, it states that, \"traffic laws are written with the assumption that the only safe car has a human driver in control at all times.\" I truely based on my knowledge absolutely believe this satement. There is no need to have technology control your car, because technology will always have some kind of flaw with it. If the car cant completely drive through any kind of circumstances then I wouldnt trust it.\n\n\"In most states it is illegal even to test computer driven cars.\" If i have no evidence that these cars could drive through traffic then I would also prevent theses cars in my society as well. Not only because i havent seen them in traffic but also because i have some kind of fear in these cars, such as accidents, reckless driving by the car, and also any kind of technical difficulties that could cause the car to mess up in traffic jams. There has been accidents by regular human beings but there could even be more with driverless cars, \"who knows?\" we wouldnt know until we have some type of prove that they can do just as fine as humans on the road.\n\nThese cars cant be trusted at this moment in time. \"Mercedes-Benz, Audi, and Nissan plan to have cars that can drive themsleves by 2020.\" Until then I wouldnt allow them on streets. If you had an accident, \"whos fault is it, the driver or the manufacturer?\" You have to create all these new laws for just one type of car. Its going to take some time, but for now you have to just keep on improving them until you have an argument theat theses cars should be allowed. Also you have to have some type of evidence that these cars could be really good drivers on the road.\n\n\"Why would anyone want a driverless car that still needs a driver?\" Eventually drivers could possibly get bored and decide to drive on their own. These cars could also bring to mind, \"A waste of money\". In the article it says \"We have to interpret the driving fun in a new way.\"This is absolutely correct, you have to have some type of way to keep the passengers alerted and also interactive in the car.\n\nFor me, I just would want to see how this car could last more in future. I want to see manufacturers bring in car entertainment and information systaems that use heads-up displays. I would also want to see more evidence on how these cars could drive in traffic, and expand in more states. Most important thing to improve is simply the safety of the cars. All of this information would have to improve for me to trust these cars. Would you trust these semi-autonomous cars?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever wanted to spend more time with your family? Well you may have that opportunity sometime in the future. Even as we go about our daily lives people somewhere are working to make that happen. With driverless cars we can spend more time with our family. The driverless car will no doubt help lessen the accidents caused by cars, it will also allow you to do something more important than driving on your way to and from work, and it will help keep your children under control because of you being able to talk to them about their actions in the backseat of your car.\n\nAutomated driving will help stop accidents from happening. Driverless cars are safer because they use sensors rather than the human attention span. Also driverless cars have an automatic brake system in a child or car got in front of the car at any time the car would be able to stop before collision. The cars will also allow everything to be more electronically inclined. If we get automated cars it will change how we live and our productivity.\n\nWhile driving a car you have to pay a lot of attention to any hazards that may come along, and you don't have any time to work on the project for your workplace. While you are driving you could have been working on said project, but you couldn't due to the fact that you had to pay attention to the road. If we develope automated cars it will help bring work productivity up and sales along with it. The economy could really get a boost from them. Which would help people get jobs and more people would come out of poverty. Which could help us pay more attention to the future generation.\n\nWhat are your kids doing half the day do you know? Do you drive with your kids in the car? How many life lessons could you have taught them if you didn't have to drive? I am guessing a lot. Your kids want to hear your stories and they want to know that they are loved by you. If you can't take five minutes out of your day to talk to them what kind of life will they lead.\n\nMy point is that with automated cars we will get more done, have more time to talk to our kids, and we will get into less accidents due to inattention. We could have a life like that. All we have to do is help each other and let them develope and test freely on our streets. Honestly, what do we have to lose? We kill each other more in car accidents than any machine ever will.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The founder of the Google Car project, Sebastian Thrun, said \"There was no way, before 2000, to make something interesting.\" Now, there is something extremely interesting in the process of being developed, driverless cars. However, driverless cars are raising some concerns to states, most of which have them banned. People should not be concerned about the development of driverless cars due to the fact that the positive aspects greatly outweigh any possible negative consequences. If driverless cars continue to develop, safety will increase, new technological innovations will be discovered and the environment will benefit.\n\nThe first positive aspect one should consider when regarding driverless cars is the increase of safety. Driverless cars are thought to have in-car entertainment systems much like the dangerous cell phone use currently being used in cars. On the other hand, in-car entertainment systems will be turned off instantly when a driver needs to pay attention to what is happening on the road or take over for the car. According to the passage, \"In this way, the in-car system is actually a safety feature, and safety is a big concern.\" Distracted driving is one of the leading causes of death, especially for teenagers and the use of driverless cars may be able to virtually eliminate this threat. Also, one of the biggest threats on the road is other drivers. In the case of driverless cars, other people being reckless on roads or not paying attention will be all but eliminated, making the road a much safer place.\n\nFurthermore, not only will the safety of everyone on the road be dramatically increased, but new technological advances and innovation towards driverless car will be discovered. Driverless cars and the sensors that operate them are nothing new, however, the creative ways developers are using them to mimic human driving is. The passage states, \"In the 1950's, General Motors created a concept car that could run on a special test track.\" In only a short span of time since then, technology has developed to the point of being able to put a self-driving car on any road. The rapid evolution of technology will only be aided if driverless cars are further developed. In fact the passage says, \"Tesla has projected a 2016 release for a car capable of driving on autopilot 90 percent of the time. Mercedes-Benz, Audi and Nissan plan to have cars that can drive themselves by 2020.\" If driverless cars continue to develop then the technological innovations made to these cars could be as unimaginable as driverless cars on this scale were in the 1950's.\n\nLastly, the development of driverless cars will not only improve technology, but it will also yield environmental benefits. According to Google co-founder Sergey Brin in the passage, \"The cars he forsees would use half the fuel of today's taxis and offer far more flexibility than a bus.\" Using only half the fuel of today's taxis would have a huge environmental impact for the better. Less fuel would be used and the fuel that is used will be able to go a longer way. With constant searches for new places to find fuel from drilling and fracking to importing, being able to stretch the fuel has more positive aspects than one. Harmful fumes given off would be reduced if fuel was cut in half and also the demand would decrease, making the needed supply decrese as well. This could greatly reduce the use of fuel extraction methods that are harmful to the environment. Also, less fuel needed would help to prolong the far future when fuel might be at risk of being depleted, making development of driverless cars would have a positive impact on the environment.\n\nThus, the combination of increased safety, technological innovation and enviormental benefits make the development of driverless cars a positve step towards an interesting future in which no one buys cars because no one needs them anymore. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In our modern age, cars have become one of the most widespread means of transportation in our world. They can provide reliable transportation from one place to another, but we could benefit greatly from limiting our drastic use of motorized vehicles.\n\nWhile cars maintain their status as one of the largest transportation mediums, they are also beginning to rival powerplants in their emissions of greenhouse gases. For example, in America and many EU countries, Motorized vehicles are second in to powerplants in greenhouse gas emissions.\n\nNow, since greenhouse gases are contributing to global warming, and cars are a major contributor to those emissions, it would be beneficial to cut down on our usage of them. In Paris, smog levels had reached such a dramatic level that the government placed a partial ban on motorized vehicles to cut down car emissions. In the suburbs of an experimental community of Vauban, Germany, 70% of residents do not own cars as a result of there being no roadways save on the outskirts that lead to the downtown area. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "It's very fun and educational to travel. Luke was a solider in World War 1 and he was stationed in Europe,during this time war was going on and this wasn't the best time to visit there. But it's a more safe invorment and is known for it's history including the \"World War 1\". When you've had a lot going on at work, just want to do something nice for the kids,or even just tired of the weather a vaction is perfect for many reasons such as the ones I've mentioned. It's also very easy to become stressed and overwheled by work and school;its just best to take a break for it all. You can just go to a beach on an tropical Island or a jungle then come back to a fresh start ready to go,before you know you'll already be planing your next trip back or somewhere esle. You'll also get to meet new people around the world maybe you'll decide to move there. These are simple reasons why its great to travel hopfully you'll concider it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author thinks we are still going to explore the planet Venus in the future, Venus once had some simlulary parts with earth. Scientists still would like to explore the planet and test some of the rocks there. Even though the Planet Venus is Earth like, but Venus is hoter then Earth, so we still can't visit the planet.\n\nScientist believe that the panet Venus long ago did have living form on it. They also believe that is possible for humans to go for a planetary visits and possibly survive. One of the danger on Planet Venus's is the\\ high temperatures, high carbondixide level, and the Atamsphere there still needs more testing to be sure.\n\nScientist say Venus is survivalbe, but they needs more test and experiment before sending humans for plantary visits or sending humans to live there. Venus once had some simuler parts with Earth such as mountains,volcanos, and oceans. Many Scients says that we would need more time to be sure that we know the Planet Venus is safer and that we need to get every information we need by sending spacecrafts into the Plant Venus to explore more. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author has said that NASA has three pictures from the red planet. In the pictures is a face, from three different years (1976, 1998, 2001). The last picture has a clear image of the face. It has a cracked eye and to the left side.\n\nThis is a rock that had just been formed like this. It had been forming to look like this for years. If it had not been discovered what would we think about the red planet. The planet would just be another planet close to earth.\n\nIf we could get a human on the red planet that would be great. We can't do that yet. It will not happen for another 400 to 500 years. This is a long wait time, but in the end it is all going to be worth every hour put in.\n\nThe red planet has many mysteres we will never know. This one will be around for years to come. The next generation will find out if life is out there. If they find it make contact.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "scientist: '' It is not a face on mars''\n\nman: '' Well why not ?''\n\nscientist: '' Using NASAs great cameras we found out that this is only a rock with shadows that form a face''.\n\nman: ''And you believe that? We have all the evidence that, that is a face on mars and you as the experts want to doubt that''.\n\nscientist: ''Well why keep making up fake eviddence that, that is a real face. faking people out making them think its real when its not''.\n\nman: ''how do you know that those cameras are wrong?''\n\nscientist: ''Well were not talking about any ordinary camera here were talking about a professional camera.''\n\nman: ''I bet you i can go to mars myself and prove that its a real face.''\n\nscientist: ''Well you do that and tell me what the outcome is. because i can find many of rocks on earth that have a resembilence of a face, but is it a face no its a rock that looks like a face.\"\n\nman: ''I can suppose your right because i can relate to that. when i was a little boy i did in deed find a rock that looked like it had a face on it.''\n\nscientist: ''Exactly, now does that prove a point to you?\"\n\nman: '' I can say that does give me proof that you are right.\"\n\nscientist: \"Well later man i've got work to catch up on.''\n\nman: \"Later.\"", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Do you really think that the \"Face\" is some ancestor that has been buried? Many do, but the real truth is, the Face is nothing more than a coincidence in nature. The Face does have the same qualities of a face, but not everything you see has to mean something. The Face is just a natural landform because it has been known to be a common mark amoungst many places. Big companies are only using this to gain attention, and it has been proven that it is nothing more than a natural landform by professional pictures and studies.\n\nTo start off, seeing structures like this were common to find, but the thought of it being common was washed away all because of a shadow. The article states, \"Scientists figured it was just another Martian mesa, common enough around Cydonia, only this one had unusual shadows that made it look like an Egyptian Pharaoh\" (2). A simple shadow does not classify it as something significant. Scientists do not use shadows to make something capable of a label.\n\nScientists use science and studies to decded what it is and is not. Why would big space companies use shadows to determine whether something is significant or not?\n\nSecondly, theroists and authors are only using this find to bring attention to Mars. The artcile informs, \"The authors reasoned it would be a good way to engage the public and attract attention to Mars\" (3). Big space companies should not use this type of information to impress the public Those companies should use that sort of information to enhance their research. Everyone that makes money from these types of finds are exploiting this for themselves, not for science. NASA used propaganda for their well being not for everyone else's.\n\nMost importantly, it has been proven that the Face is nothing more than a natural landform. The article finishes, \"Thousands of anxious web surfers were waiting when the image first appeared on the JP website revealing . . . a natural landform. There was no alien monument after all\" (7). Science and these professional pictures have proved itself that the famous Face was nothing more than pure coincidence. The Face should be actually caled the Fake.\n\nAfter all of this, do you still believe the Face is real? From propaganda to selfish exploitations to all of it being nothing more than a farce, do you still believe? Science has proven it to many, but of those many, there are still some who believe. Even after the claim of it being something it is not because of a shadow, the way authors used this information for social gain, the way science and professional pictures had oproven its nonexisistent glory, many refuse to believe that it was all for nothing.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Hello, my name is Hannah. I am a scientist at NASA who has been studying the \"face\" on Mars over the years. Today my close friend Mason had asked me about any imformation I've found out recently. I said,\"Well, it just appears to be a natural formation rather than something that was created.\" He argued and argued over how the aliens built it,and how its just been hidden all these years.\n\nIn a shorter explaination I told Mason that the shadows show how they do on Earth on natural formations. He didn't quite get it so I showed him a messa and how they shadow. He still thought the marsians made the formation of the face.\n\nThe next day, he talked to me about the same thing. Only this time I knew that I could prove to him that the \"face\" was only natural. I pulled up the pictures taken over the years and let Mason examine them very carefully. The picture taken in 2001 shows that there is nothing else around the face. If there was anyhting on the ground such as an airplane or a shack, you have been able to tell what it was. But there was nothing. Mason still didn't agree that the form on Mars was a natural landform.\n\nIt was now the third day he has argued over the face on Mars. But this day, Mason didnt argue with me. He asked to see the pictures again, along with pictures of a messa and a butte, which are natural landforms here on Earth. Mason looked for hours and hours and hours. He finally spoke up,\"Maybe you guys here at NASA are right.. It seems to be completely natural..\" I replied,\"I told you old pal. Next time you should look into something more before you argue about it.\"\n\nThe next morning Mason came to work with me. The other scientists and I all came agreed that the face on Mars was completely natural. Not only did NASA finally figure out how to \"unmask the face\" and call it a natural landform, but they also provided a lot of information that way people understood it better. To this day the \"face\" is known to be a natural landform!", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think driverless cars is a good idea. Some people would like being able to have a driverless car. I think that it would be cool to have one and easier.\n\nIn the passage it says that the car notifies the person when human assistance is needed ahead, which is something that could prevent wrecks or traffic jams. It also says something about the \"Traffic jam assistant\" which can steer, accelerate, and brake by themselves.\n\n\"Google's modified Toyota Prius uses position-estimating sensors on the left rear wheel, a rotating sensor on the roof, a video camera mounted near the rearview mirror, four automotive radar sensors, a GPS reciever, and an intertial motion sensor. Which shows that its really safe.\n\nThe brakes have a way better response and control than humans. The sensors detect and respond to out of control skids or roll overs, it applies brakes on the wheels and has a much better brake than humans.\n\nThat is why i think driverless cars is a good idea, and it should be something that people look into and even if they do get big,\n\nnot everyone has to get one only who wants one. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Would you like going to different parts of the world to care for animals and help people in WW2? Then you should join the Seagoing Cowboys program, because you get to take care of horses, young cows, and mules. You also go to different parts of Europe and when your in Europe you get to tour and go to different places.When your on return trips after the animals had been unloded there are tons of stuff to do in free time. You get the side bennifit of seeing Europe and China.You can tour in places like castles in Crete and be marveled at the Panama Canal on the way to China. On return trips we cowboys played basesball; volleyball games in the empty holds where the animals used to stay you could also play tennis, fencing, boxing, reading, whittling, and fun games. When I had this oppertunity I took it because it is a once in a lifetime chance! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The author states at the very end of the passage, \"Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imagination and innovation\". That is powerful. He is explaining that just because we do stuff here on Earth, or just because we find something out does not mean that we stop there. It means we strive and conquer our mission to do more, and here's why.\n\nThe scientists want samples, however, that would be very risky. Despite the risks, scientists would have to get up close and personal with Venus. They personally know that there are a lot of risks getting close to Venus. They mentioned that it could melt a spacecraft in a matter of a couple hours. However, they are determined. The author mentioned Venus had a lot of \"value\", he also stated, \"not only because of the insight to be gained on the planet itself, but also because human curiosity will likely lead us into many equally intimidating endeavors\". This has meaning, and what it means is that not only do the scientists want to know about Venus and their ideas may lead to exploring Venus , but human curiosity will also take over and other people will want to know about Venus as well.\n\nIn conclusion, Scientists want to know and explore Venus, and normal people are going to want to understand and learn about Venus as well. The scientists need this information to further the progression of learning and experimenting with Venus. They are probably going to do whatever it takes to learn about Venus, despite the dangers and fatal risks of going there. They will more than likely one day get there, but there will probably be a lot of trial and error along the way.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Cars are a wonderful thing. They are perhaps one of the worlds greatest advancements and technologies. Cars get us from point a to point b. That is exactly what we want isnt it? We as humans want to get from one place to anther as fast as possible. Cars are a suitable to do that. They get us across the city in a matter of minutes. Much faster than anyhting else we have. A train isnt going to get me across the city as fast as my car is and neither is a public bus, but those other forms of transportation just might be the way to go. Don't get me wrong, cars are an absolutly amazing thing but, maybe they just cause way to much stress, and maybe they hurt our environment in ways that we don't think they will. With a bus or a train you do not have to worry about washing your car or getting frustrated when stuck in a bad traffic jam on I-4. Also there is not as much pollution in air hurting our environment. You might not think so, but there are many advanteges to limiting our car usage.\n\nOne advantage that not only humans would benefit from, but also plants and animals is that there would be a lot less pollution in the air hurting out environment. Right now our cars give off gases that are extreamly harmful towards our environment. These gases are called green house gases and come out of the exhuast pipes in our cars. Your car alone dosent give off much gas but collectively, our cars give off enormous amounts of gases. This is especially true in big cities like France. In France, their pollution level was so high it was record breaking. due to that france decided to enforce a partial ban on cars. This is described in the second article \" Paris bans driving due to smog\", by Robert Duffer, \" On Monday motorists with even-numbered license plates were orderd to leave their cars at home or suffer a 22-euro fine ($31). The same would apply to odd-numbered plates the following day.\" After France limlited driving there congestion was down by 60 percent. \" Congestion was down 60 percent in the capital of France\". So after five days of intense smog, 60 percent of it was clear after not using cars for only a little while. Even across the world in Bogota, columbia they are limiting driving and reducing smog levels. In the third article \"car-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota\", by Andrew Selsky, it describes the annual car-free day they have to reduce smog. \" the goal is to promote alternative transportation and reduce smog\". So all over the world people are relizing that wilthout cars, we are insuring the saftey and well being of our environment.\n\nThe second advantage that would come with limiting car use is less stress. Everyone knows that driving a car causes emence amounts of stress. Getting caught in traffic is a major cause of stress in someones life. Haveing to repeatingly wash your car just to get it dirt again causes stress. Having people in the back of your car screasming and yelling all while music is blasting, causes stress. So obviously driving causes stress. If we were to limit our car usage we would not be as stressed as we usually are. There would be no traffic, no car washes and no one screaming in a small confineded space. In the first article \" In German Suburb, life goes on without cars\", by Elisabeth Rosenthal, a citezen named Huidrun Walter, states \" When i had a car i was always tense. I'm much happier this way\". So with out the stress of a car Huidrun Walter is a looser and happier person, less stress equals happier person. In the third article, \" Car-free dai is spinning into a big hit in Bogota\", by Andrew Selsky, it states \" It's a good opportunity to take away stress...\". If we have the opportunity to take away stress, why not take it. It is a huge advantage in our lives to limit driving if it takes away stress. No one wants stress, no one needs stress, and if we have an opportunity to take some of the stress away, take that opportunity.\n\nIn conclusion, there are many advanteges to limiting car use, one being theat we get to help the environment and two being that it helps reduce stress. Our environment is already screwed up in so many ways, if we can help it to become the healthy enironment it once was, then do it. Stress is proven to impare your personal health, no one wants to be unhealthy and no one wants stress in their life. If you want the environment to get better and you want to reduce stress in your life then take this advantage and impliment it. Some might not think that this is an advantage, but i just explained that it is a clear advantege that has been proved to help the enviornment and reduce stress. Limiting car use is a very effective advantage that really does work in more than one place. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The future car(s) seems to question everybody. My argument with this is for two reasons; it would use less gas and it will let you know when you are needed. Cars and gas go together like Jack and Jill. So being that the upcoming Driverless Cars will make a difference in that.\n\nWe all hate paying such a high price for gas but we still end up having to. If the Driverless Cars are made and sold they said in paragraph 1 they would use half\n\nthe fuel of todays taxis. My second reason is because unlike the 2013 BMW when you are needed with your attention the car will vibrate providing you with knowledge that something is going on the road or wherever you are.\n\nConcluding my argument I do believe the Driverless cars should be made and released. For multiple reasons it could help and dramastically change the future. That is why I think they should create the new Driverless Cars", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Being a Seagoing Cowboy is really fun, but also can be a challenge. You travel around the world and you get to see really cool things. But its not all fun, you have to help and work.\n\nI loved being a Seagoing Cowboy, it changed my life. I was on the SS Charles W. Wooster, headed for Grecce, with 335 horsess and lots of hay and oats. I made nine trips. More trips than any Seagoing Cowboy. Being a Seagoing Cowboy is a great opportunity to help people in need, travel, learn, and to meet new people. You can go to Venice, Italy and take a gondola ride, or tour a excavated castle in Crete. Also, go to the Panama Canal or see the Acropolis in Greece. There are many things to do while being a Seagoing Cowboy.\n\nEveryone likes a little fun once in a while, but you don't always get to have fun. When being a Seagoing Cowboy, there are lots of dangerous things that can happen. You can slip off deck and drown. You can get badly injuired. Also, you can get sea sick. I cracked my ribs while sliding down a slippery ladder, and almost fell into the Atlantic Ocean. If you want to be a Seagoing Cowboy, you have to be cautious and carefull.\n\nAlso, there is work to do while on board and on land. Caring for the animals will keep you busy. You have to feed them and water them two or three times a day. Also, bales of hay and begs of oats will need to be pulled up from the lower loads of your ship. Another thing to do is clean animal stalls. Dirty stalls are not cool so clean them every day or two, to keep the animals clean and keep the ship from being stinky. You will always have something to do while being a Seagoing Cowboy.\n\nYou can also have fun after the animals are unloaded. You can play baseball and volleyball in empty holds. You can also do some table-tennis, fencing, boxing, reading, whittling, and other games to make time go by. You can make up games or play games that the people who need help play, then take them home and share them with your neighboorhood. There is lots of fun things to do on board and off board.\n\nBeing a Seagoing Cowboy can help you to be aware of other peoples needs, and help you to be grateful for things you have that other people want. After being a Seagoing Cowboy, you might change someones life, either while doing service of after service. After my service, my family and I hosted a number of international students and exchange visitors for many years. You can change your life, and someone else's after being a Seagoing Cowboy.\n\nBeing a Seagoing Cowboy is a fun opportuinity to help, travel, and learn. You can play games on board and help a town in need. You can travel around the world and see castles, go to famous cities, see old historical buildings, and many more. But its not all fun and games. There is cleaning to do and most importantly, helping. You should be a Seagoing Cowboy, it could change your life. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the following ideas and information passage set we see the effects of using cars too much and how limiting our car use can have a huge impact on, not only our environment, but also on cities on people. Limiting our car usage isn't only a thing that the United States has to work on, but we see that Central America and Europe also has to work on it. Limiting our car usage isn't a small issue, but more of a global issue. Over the years we have seen the effects of global warming (something cause by fossil fuels, which is gas coming from our cars) and how they have had an enormous impact on our world. So, why is liming our car usage even remotely important to us?\n\nIn the second article \"Paris bans driving due to smog\", paragraph 10, the first thing it says is \"After days of near-record pollution..\", well, what does this say about how we're living today? Paris so close to to being on record breaking pollution, not that it's anything to be proud of. But, if that's how much pollution Paris has, which is a famous city for not only being the \"City of Love\", but for also being big, how will every other city's pollution be? Cities have been growing and expanding so much recently, factories are being built and more cars are being sold, how will this help limiting our car usage? If cities keep expanding, we'll just be adding to the pollution that already exists. After a couple decades all the issues we seem to be ignoring will come up and if the problems are bad now, how bad will they be in the future? This isn't just something we can ignore!\n\nLike David Goldberg says in paragraph seven in \"In German Suburb, Life Goes On Without Cars\" \"All of our development since World War II has been centered on the car..\". Why have we been focusing more on a car than on health and medicine and cures for some illnesses? Why is a car so important? Yes it makes going to places much more easier and quicker, but at what cost will we go to to make things easier on us? It isn't jsut about the pollution caused from our cr usage, but it's also about our health. There are fewer and fewer parks by the year because we'd rather have all our tax money go towards roads instead parks. More malls are opening up and more fast food places are opening up on big interstates and highways, and now all we really have to being close to nature is when we pass by the trees near the interstates and highways. We need trees in order to have oxygen, but if all this pollution is slowly killing trees, how much more time do we have left before we realize it's too late to try saving our trees and limiting our car usage? Back then no one really worried much about limiting our car usage and pollution, because it wasn't that bad. Now all you ever really hear is about pollution and how to stop it.\n\nEven though we really have got to start limiting our car usage, there is still hope in lowering and or even stopping pollution. We could start off small, for instance, by having a day where no one is allowed to drive their cars to places or be fined if you do drive, like Bogota, Colombia does in \"Car-free day is spinning into a big hit in Bogota\". It must've had a positive effect because it encouraged Cali and Valledupar, two other Colombian cities, to participate in the event as well. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Driverless cars are revolutionizing the auto industry. This idea behind this futuristic technology is to allow the user to relax and not be bothered by the worries of the road. While this idea sounds nice in concept, when put into reality it just becomes illogical. It is for this reason that unless groundbreaking technology is discovered that can make driverless cars safe and practical, people should just continue to drive cars themselves.\n\nOne of the specific faults of driverless cars is the fact that they are not truly driverless. This is made evident when the author states that \"In fact, none of the cars developed so far are completely driverless. This means the human driver must remain alert and be ready to take over when the situation requires\" (7). The whole purpose of developing computurized cars is so that no attention is required by the humans within the cars. If the human still has to be \"alert\" and ready to drive, then the entire point of having these automated cars is negated. The attention required by a human takes away from the ability to relax and not worry about the road. To that point, if the operator of the vehicle is not able to fully relax, he/she would much rather be solely operating the vehicle for the strict purpose of keeping occupied. If they cannot risk leaving the car alone to occupy themselves with other things, than the entire purpose of the driverless car has been defeated.\n\nAnother factor that argues against driverless cars is the issue of safety. While some may argue that the automation of the car takes away the factor of human error, this puts too much trust in the computers. While tested, and proven safe, it is still worrysome to think about the fact that the operator's life is solely in the driving skill of the computer that is driving the car. It is unrealistic to put this much trust into a computer preforming a predominantly human activity. Human knowlege, reactions, and skill are all key attributes in driving, which is why taking these attributes away may turn out to be dangerous. This is the reason that \"...in most states it is illegal even to test computer-driven cars\" (9). Things are not just made illegal without ample reason to do so. Clearly the United States government, the most powerful government in the world believes that there is too much risk involved in testilng, nonetheless driving these furutistic automobiles.\n\nThis idea of driverless cars follows the recent social trend of laziness. As a species we are beginning to rely more and more on computers to complete simple tasks that we are more than capable of completing ourselves. There is a point where technology is taken too far and that is the point where it has an opportunity to impact our safety. This is that point. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Facial Action Coding System enables computers to identify human emotions. Do we really need that to identify our emotions, feelings or making us smile?\n\nIn the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" the author describes how a new technology identifies peoples emotions. We don't need the technology to read our emotional expression. \"Imagine being able to detect exactly how other people are feeling, even when they are trying to hide their emotions.\" We all try to hide our emotions, but there are people that could help us. Like friends or family they might make you smile when you're feeling down.\n\nEveryone has feelings and we sometimes express it to people we get along. The Facial Action Coding Sysytem is not going to make us smile everyday, we all go through something in life. \"For example, it you smile when a Web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad might follow. But if you frown, the next ad will be different.\" People are not going to express their feelings on every ad that tells you how you feel. These technology of calculating your emotions are not going to be helpful.\n\nIt's frusterating when a lot of people tell you to smile and that it looks pretty on you, when you don't want to smile. They don't know what we are going through in life. \"In the real smile, the zygomatic major lift the corners or your mouth. But in a false smile, the mouth is stretched sideways using the zygomatic major and a different muscle.\" Everyone fakes a smile somtimes for any reasons.\n\nIn conclusion, the technology that calculates your emotions are not going to work. Maybe Mona Lisa had so many emotions that poeple used that technology to fake her facial expression. There are people that can't even smile from all the pain they have in mind. So why do we need a technology to tell us our emotions when we know how we feel? ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" i am for the value of using this technology to read students emotion expressions. i think it is good to know how you are really feeling based off your facial expressions. Maybe you're sad or depressed and you don't even know it, but a computer software knows and could make you not even express that feeling to anyone or possibly help in anyway.\n\nLets say you are tired of seeing ads on the internet you dislike. Well the facial reconizing software can help. In the article 'Making Mona Lisa Smile,\" the author states \"if you smile when a web ad appears on your screen, a similar ad might follow. but if you frown the next add will be different.\" (paragraph 6) It would be able to work for anything, Like what if you are listening to music and a song comes on you dislike the computer can tell that you dislike the song so it will play songs that aren't alike, but will play more songs to when you're expressing a happy face.\n\nI feel it is always important for you or someone else to know how are are feeling because what if you just aren't having a good dasy, someone can help. You're easily able to tell how a friend is feeling by the look of their face, but the computer software is very advance and will get way more accurate answers based off a very slight move from your neutral face. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Have you ever been interested in studying astronomy or space sciences. Well, across the nation, people who work for NASA expore space or study planets to find. Of the many planets in the solar system, this essay analyzes the planet Venus and why we should study it. In the article, The challenges of Exploring Venus, the author clearly supports the idea that studying Venus is a worthy pursuit despite the dangers it presents by disscusing the three main reasons based on it's distance from Earth, Earth like features, and the possibility of sending a space mission there.\n\nFirst of all, the author clearly discusses that we should study Venus because it's similarity and proximity to Earth. The article states, \"Often referred to as Earth's\n\n\"twin\", \"Venus is the closest plannet to earth in terms of density and size, and occasionally the closest in distance\" (2). Based on this quote, this implies that Venus may have similar shape and size to earth. Because it's sometimes the closest distance to earth based on orbit, it may be the most convient to visit compared to the other planets in the solar system.\n\nThe next to study Venus is that scientists have found ways to send vehicles carrying humans to study Venus. The article explains how NASA has an idea of sending humans to study Venus when the article states, \"Imagine a blimp like vehicle hovering 30 or so miles above the roiling Venusian landscape\" (5). In this quote, this means that people would ride in a spacecraft close enough to Venus to see the surface. Also, the article contains an anology when it explains how \"a vehicle hovering over Venus would avoid the unfriendly ground conditions by staying up and our of their way\" similar to how \"jet planes travel at a higher altitude to fly over many storms\" (5). Based on this quote, the view out of this spacecraft looking down at Venus may be similar to viewing out of a jetplane window on Earth, which is what you may expect out of this space journey.\n\nThe final reason to study Venus is because the planet has similar topography and may have had conditions similar to earth. The author clearly describes Earth's and Venus's similarity to Earth when the article says, \"Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life just like Earth. Because of the possibility that Venus has or used to support living, it would be worth studying Venus, which ties back to the main idea of why it's a worthy pursuit. If we find this to be true, then maybe one day we'll live on Venus.\n\nThe author did a great job of supporting the idea that Venus is a worthy pursuit based on the ideas of Venus's proximity to Earth, the possibility of life on Venus, and building a vehicle to ship humans to explore Venus without landing on the surface. Maybe one day we'll actually push forward with this pursuit of studying Venus and find a way to possibly get there. Overall, studying astronomy may help us understand the uncertainty of our neighboring planets, which may give us the oppertunity to find another world to inhabit.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "mostly peolpe cannot hover over the planet venus safely because far above the planet can provide only limited insight on ground.Most forms cannot penetrate the dense atmosphere, rendering standard forms of photography and videography ineffective. The most importanty is that researchers cannot take samples of rocks, gas, or anything else, from a distance.\n\nNASA is also working on other opproches to studying venus. they have a sample modae silicon carbie that have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaosmec of venus's surface. Nasa has anther project looking back to an ol technology called mechanical computers. the mechanical computers were the first envisioned in the 1800s, these played an important role in the 1940s during the world war 2. These computers can calculate by using gears and levers and also\n\nthey do not require electronic at all. Its sometimes better too have older gagets from the 1900s because they solve more stuff in the future than the new technology. Modern computers are enormously powerful, flexible, and quick,but tend to be more delicate when it comes to extreme pphysical conditions. peolpe can imagine\n\nusing future technology like cell phones or tablet to aci or heat capable of melting tin, but mechanical parts can be made more resistant to presssure,heat,and other forces. its better using oler technology because you can\n\nuse it to go to different planets and do not have to worry about technology.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Imagine a day where there will be no driver at the steering wheel of a car, problems would eventually arise, specially if there are accidents and people don't know who to blame. Driverless cars that exist today are not entirely driverless, they someone who can take comand if there are traffic problems or construction ahead. Everyday technology advances more and more, some companies believe that in the future there will be cars that opeate by themselves without the need of having someone there incase of a problem, some companies even have a prediction for when such cars will come out into the market. Driverless cars shouldn't be on the road.\n\nFirst of all, Driverless cars shouldn't be be on the road because they will not be able to operate correctly if there is a problem in the raod. Driverless cars today still need someone there incase there are problems in the road that only humans can take care of, how will a car know what to do in this type of situation, they don't think like people. There are situations that could happen while a driverles car is on the road that sometimes can not be foreseen, therefore the car cannot be programed for such situation. Humans normally know what to do if there are roads constructions ahead or there is something on thee road, like a ditch to avoid, and in these situations how can a car 'see' what goes on in the road. Even if the cars were to have sensors for the outside, what about the inside, if there was a problem with the passanger the car wouldn't be able to tell what to do.\n\nAdditionally, driverless cars shouldn't be on the road because how would law apply to them. There are many accidents that happen in the road every day, law is applied in this situations to know who is to take the blame and what to do.\n\nIn the situation of a driverless car it would be dificult to pinpoint how law would apply to them, if an accident were to happen, would the manufacturer or the driver be the one to take the balme. There isn't even a driver in this car, and sometimes technology malfunctions occur, so no one could really take the blame. With time anything can malfunction, but if an accident that involves death is to occur how would the problem be managed if there is only a car, technology, to blame and take resposibility.\n\nMost importantly, driverless cars shouldn't be on the road beacuse there will be too many expenses. If there would be driverless cars in the future, how much would you be charged for being taken somewhere by such a car. In today's world there is almost always a cost in order to get any type of service, the drverless car would, most likely, have a cost in order to be used, and at first that wouldn't be cheap. A driverless car would steal chaufers jobs, and sometimes those jobs are all that sustain some people, so this car would make many not have a way to get paid. At first when this cars are being constructed, how will they be paid for, each city would probably have to spend a vast amount of money to get this cars so they can start operating.\n\nIn conclusion, Driverless cars shouldn't be on the road. If these cars were on the road there will be too many expenses, how would law apply to them, and they won't be able to operate correctly if there is a problem on the road. There will be many problems with these cars, and conflicts will be harder to slove with them. If they are released into the market, a person should first think of all the things and conflicts that may arise just because of one car before using it.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the article in the last paragraph the author was talking about how \"Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts\". That phrase means to me that just becasue its really hard to get to Venus or observe Venus doesnt mean it is impossible to get there. Also not losing hopes because maybe they could build something to get there even though it is not safe. Now days they have more technology and more smart things that could possibly get there. Venus being the the closest planet to Earth is an advantage because it is not as far as other planets scienctists coud possibly get samples of rocks,gas, or anything else.\n\nThis is not easy like it says in paragraph 5 \"Not easy conditions, but survivablefor humans\". The temperatures are very high 800 degrees Fahrenheit which also makes it vey difficult. It is hard to examen Venus closley but it is not impossible like the author told us in paragraph 1 \"it has proved a very challenging place to examine more closley\".\n\nIn the article \"The challenge of Exploring Venus\" has sad a lot about Venus I agree with the author. Author thinks it is possible to get closer to Venus and I agree. I agree becasue now days scienctits have more technology have new things it could possibly happen for them to get a closer view.\n\nEven though scienctist have through go through a lot and learn a lot I feel like they would be happy if they could get it to happen. Back in those days they had computers like it says on paragraph 7 which is so amazing how those scienctists were not scared becasue it was obviously more dangerous it was not as safe as it is now. \" human curiosity will likely lead us into many equallly endeavis\" this phrase grabbed my attention beacsue it is really true us humans want to know so much that we start to think and think that makes it go around and humans also start wondering which makes people start learning about it. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The electoral college is an unfair and outdated system. It is unfair to voters. A states electoral votes often do not tell what that state truly wants. And no candidate should face what Gore did in 2000, with a winning popular vote, but less electoral votes losing him the election. It is an outdated system that should not be used in today's modern society.\n\nWhen we vote for a specific president, we are actually voting for a slate of electors. The chosen electors are supposed to support the winning candidate, but they can easily decide to ignore that and cast their vote toward whomever the please. This can cause a president to get the greatest popular vote, and still lose because they did not get as many electoral college votes once all states' votes have been combined. This should certainly not happen. Whatever candidate is preferred by the most people to take office should win the election, period. In the past, maybe it would have been good to let the more educated electors choose the president rather than any citizen, but in this modern age of knowledge, people can be trusted to choose a leader that shares in the best interests of our country. Al Gore in 2000 lost the election after winning the most popular votes. That shows us that this electoral system does not work effectively, and should not be used today.\n\nPerhaps more worrying is the electoral college's winner-take-all system. If a candidate wins a state's election by a tiny amount, they get every electoral vote for that state. This allows candidates to ignore smaller states, or states they know they will win, and focus on larger states and ones that have a very tight election could be easily persuaded for advertisements and campaigns. Ohio is known as a state that looks at their candidates closely, and can be persuaded to choose one based on what they know about them. Candidates tend to focus more resources here or in other similar states. It makes some sense to focus more on larger populations, and states like Ohio that are more interested in the election, but during the 2000 campaign, seventeen states didn't see the candidates at all, and could not make educated descisions during the election. In a close election, half the people in the state's views will be ignored, and will not matter to the elction. That means half of California's 35 million voters would not matter at all in the election. The fate of the election should not be put in the hands of Ohio or other \"swing\" states, just ignoring less important ones.\n\nToday's society needs a more fair system of electing a president. A popular vote from everyone is the most fair way to make sure the most popular candidate wins the election, and will cause candidates to focus on all citizens, focusing on large populations, but still trying to gain popularity with rural areas as well. America's citizens deserve a fair, proper election, that satisfies the most people possible. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "cars, they wernt invented in the old days. who needs them, not me. screw cars. Ill tell u what u need to know about life and transportation. We can limit car use if u just use this information and use it in your life.\n\nparis has so much smog. Ew!!! No one likes that so lets limit car use. paris has 147 micrograms of matter in cubic meter measurement. Dang taxes! I hate soccer moms, my mom is one so i cant hate them too much. All they do is drive everywhere and use up all the resources so there kid can strike out in little leauge! Now i will tell you how to fix this problem.\n\nif some of the stupid soccer moms driving around there rolling egg (mini van) the car use would be cut in half. Then you might say then what is my little kid going to do. You can read a biycle places just like it said in line 24 of \"car-free day spinning into a big hit bogota. Now ill tell you what kind of bike and what your gonna do with it and your gonna love it!\n\nA bmx bike is what im talking about. you can transportate it to the skatepark to ride the ramps. Its really fun and i love it. Those gas using Mini vans would be off the streets and bmx bikes can take over. Think about our earth for once please.\n\nwell to conclude things up car use is oversused highly. It is mainly the soccer moms fault. To fix all the problems in the world everyone needs to get a bmx bike and go ride some dirt jumps and this world would be a happier place!!! ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "To the author, the limitations that exploring venus brings, should not be enough to kill the curiosity that many of us have. Although it has been a long time since a spacecraft has touched down on Venus, the author believes that with the technology and willpower we have today, Venus could be explored.\n\nThe author keeps referring to Venus as earth's twin. this could show that the author is trying to get across that this planet is not much different from ours. This technique can help pursuade people into believing that it is beyond possible to touch down on Venus. The author writes about alot of the reasons why we could go to Venus, but makes sure to touch on the challenges people may face and the limitations. \"Venus has the hottest surface temperature of any planet in our solar system, even though Mercury is closer to the sun. Beyond high pressure and heat, Venusian geology and weather present additional impediments like erupting volcanoes, powerful earthquakes, and frequent lightning strikes to probes seeking to land on its surface.\" These limitations stated in paragraph 3 of the article are just some of the challenges associated with exploring Venus.\n\nThe author believes even with all of the limitations, studying Venus could have so many benefits in the future. But another limitation is that hovering Venus at a safe distance might not give the insight on the conditions that people may need. Although he seems to be focusing on the negatives of it all, he brings in light to work around the limits. \"NASA is working on other approaches to studying Venus. For example, some simplified electronics made of silicon carbide have been tested in a chamber simulating the chaos of Venus's surface and have lasted for weeks in such conditions.\" Here the author is bringing in the positives which ultimately outweigh the negatives. The limitations seemed to revolve around the harsh conditions, but the author introducing this peice of technology that would work around it helps support the authors ideas.\n\nTo conclude, the author has many doubts and fears about studying Venus, but remembers to tell about ways to work around the natural challenges the people would face. The authors idea that claims that studying venus is more important than the dangers pursuades many people into believing that as well. Finally, the author does a great job getting his point across. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Humans show emotion all the time based on the way they are feeling. This exert of emotions allows those around them to understand how they are feeling and what might have caused that feeling. Technological innovations have created software that allows a Facial Action Coding System to read the emotions on individuals faces and decide the percentage of their feelings. Whether their emotion be happiness, surprise, anger, disgust, fear, or sadness the computer system is able to use muscle structure to determine the emotion of a person. Although not completely ready, this new technology could create endless possibilities in schools, the workplace, and hospitals. Technology that reads human emotion would be valuable to students in a classroom because it would help students, assist teachers, and make learning easier.\n\nTo begin, facial recognition technology would be valuable in classrooms becasue it would help students understand their emotions in relation to the work they are doing. Dr. Huag predicts, \"A classroom computer could recognize when a student is becoming confused or bored.\" If the computer helped students to understand their emotions then they might work faster and more efficently. The addition of this technology would also make working in groups easier because students would be able to recognize each others emotions in relation to their thoughts and ideas about a project proposal or how they divide a project. Although students can read each others emotions outwardly, the facial coding system would help them to recognize the feelings of their peers and easily come to a solution. Facial Action Coding Systems would be helpful in classrooms by creating a calm and simple environment for students to work in with each other.\n\nAnother way facial recognition software would be valuable in classrooms is by making the job of the teacher easier. Often times it is difficult for a teacher to fully understand how a student is feeling. This makes them unable to help students to the best of their ability. After reading a students expressions the program \"could modify the lesson, like an effective human instructor.\" This capability of the program would allow teachers to comprehend how their students are feeling in order to simplify their instructions. If the software decides a student is angry then the computer could modify the lesson and the teacher would then be able to help the student more efficently.The software would also help if a teacher had to have a substitute teacher for a period of time, by instructing the substitute on the students feelings. Facial Action Coding Systems would be valuable in classrooms by assisting teachers in their ability to help students understand materials.\n\nFinally, facial recognition software would be valuable in schools because it would make the entire learning process easier. The ability for the computer to read the students emotions would be able to assist teacahers on the best method of instruction they could use. The author of \"Making Mona Lisa Smile\" describes, \"you can probably tell how a friend is feeling simply by the look on her face. Of course, most of us would have troube actually describing each facial trait the conveys happy, worried, etc.\" With this new technology students in a classroom would be able to quickly comprehend their peers feelings in order to best help them. Facial Action Coding Systems could change the way students learn and teachers instruct by creating a quick evaluation on how students are feel about a subject in order to teach them quickly and efficently. The software could ultimately alter the speed of learning forever.\n\nTo summarize, Facial Action Coding Systems would be valuable in classrooms by making school easier for the student, teacher, and overall learning process. If facial recognition software was implemented it would enable entire schools to understand how students are feeling in order to alter their plans to assist the student in learning properly. This device would be able to educate students more proficently and would allow more learning to be done in a short period of time. Everyone shows emotion no matter what they are doing, so this system would be able to read expressions and change the way students learn. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear State Senator,\n\nElections are up coming soon and before we all even know it, it's going to be election day. As we all know, there is this process called The Electoral College that was established in the Constitution by our founding fathers. To be honest, I think it is time for a change. If you really think about it, The Electoral College isn't really in favor of the people anymore. Here's what i think should happen, instead of on election day when we vote for just the President and just getting the senates that ran for the Presidental candidate, I think we should have two different votings: one for the President and one for the senates, here's why:\n\nFirst, when election day comes around and we think we are voting for the president, we aren't, but instead voting for a big group of slate electors where they vote for the president. For example, if you lived in Washington and you wanted to vote for [John] Doe, for instance, you would be voting for a slate of about 35 electors pledged to that President. Then the slate of electors vote for the presdient, not the people, and I dont think everyone knows that. Most of the people that know about have said that The Electoral College is a \"diaster factor\" while the government says that \"the American people should consider themselves lucky\" WRONG!!!!!! The American people technically can't even vote for their own president becuase \"it's against the Constitution\" there needs to be a change. Like allowing some people who go in to vote to either: vote for a slate of electors who elect the President or just vote for the president themselves. That way the people feel like their vote actually does count.\n\nThank you State Senator for giving me some of your time so you can read my letter to you about The Electoral College. I hope you take my idea under consideration.\n\nThanks again,\n\nSincerely,\nPROPER_NAME (student at SCHOOL_NAME) ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Dear State Senator,being apart of the voting process is extremely important.It's important,because you are helping by popular vote for the president of the United States.Electoral College helps you get a better understanding of the voting process and the effect that everyone's vote has.However,the Electoral colleges are not a really big help when it comes down to the country.Here is provided information about why they should change election by popular vote.\n\nFirst to start the discussion,Electoral Colleges were estblished by the founding fathers in the constitution as a compromise between election of the president by vote in congress and election of the president by popular vote.The Electoral College is not just a place it's an important process.This college is made of electors.They have meetings where they vote for the president and vice president.The college is consisted of 538 electors.At least 270 electoral votes are required to elect the president.Each candidate that is interested in becoming president in your state has to have his or her own flock of electores.The electors are chosen by the political party ran by the candidate.This college basically provides you with a idea of why it is important to vote. The country's fate rests in the hands of many.\n\nNext,The Electoral college system only allows voters to vote for the slate electors. The president of the United States votes is more important then the slate electors.The president of the United States is the one responsible for the Country.Most people refer to the most common argument between the electoral college as the disater factor.Like for instance if someone wanted to vote for a specific person you would have to vote for a different amount of slate electors also depending where you lived as well.\n\nContinuing,the Electoral college is really regarded as an anachronism aslo known as a non-democratic method of selecting a president. Many people believe that,that should be overruled by declaring the candidate who recieves more popular votes is the winner.Each party selects a slates of electors that is trusted to vote for the nominee that was picked slate electors.Even though the Electoral has a lack of conservative reasons, there are five reasons that people think that should be retained. The first reason is the certainy of outcome,second Everyone's President,third Swing states,fourth Big States,and lastly Avoiding run-off Elections.These 5 things are reasons why people feel that these colleges should stay.\n\nThe conclusion, the president of the United states is chosen by our votes.We have the power to make this country strong,but we also have the power to make this country a train wreck.Voting is really important this can determine the fate of the country.\n\nSincerly,PROPER_NAME ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "I think that what they are saying is true becuase they are stating from both minds. They are talking in both ways and they are decribeing it in the both ways.they also have said that the future will be full of new cars and better techonlogy for our generation. Cars are really good and they have helped us through a lot of the rough trobles of being inside of an car. Lots of people get into accidents and they hurt themsleves a lot like what they are stating in the passage.\n\nSome cars dont really work as well asd most of them they seem to stop a lot or have problems which really is the reason why we get into accidents. It would help if they could fix these cars. Finally, i think that what they say is abolustlely true and that they should bring this up to the car people so they can fix the cars and make them better for people to use and so we can feel safer in our communities. They should build more sturdier things for us so we can prevent all of it. They did a really good job stating this and i think that they should write more. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Facial codeing is it useful?\n\nTechnology is it really advanced enough to know whether or not someone is happy? Is the way we are suppose to look when angry the way to judge somebody, what if it's there natural face? would somebody take offense if they drew a drawling that was suppose to be happy but the computer said it was only 64 percent happy?i know i would now let me tell you what i think.\n\nTechnology is really cool don't get me wrong i think technology is the greatest invention in this world. But i believe we all know the fact that technology can get really expensive and for really stupid reasons So, i am going against this and here's why. How this works is the computer takes a face into a 3-D model and there are suppose to be 44 muscles that move. In paragraph three there's is a part that says \"For example, your frontails pars lateralis muscle (above your eye) raises your eyebrows when you're surprised; your orbicularis oris (around your mouth) tightens your lips to show anger\". Now your probably saying ok why are you against it, because not everyones eybrows move when they're surprised.\n\nPersonally my eyebrows also move when im really tired, nervouse buzzed out on nicotine or simply when i have the jitter bugs becaus im scared and shaking. \"she's 83 percent happy, 9 percent disguisted, 6 percent fearful, and 2 percent angry\". This is where the role play of me not aggree with this comes in, i honestly feel like the computer is throwing numbers at you we cant be accurate. and even if we were there doing this on scientifically how the muscle should look which is a lot of bull crap to me. \"Yet Dr. Huang observes that artist such as da Vinci studied human anatomy to help them paint facial muscles precisely enough to convey specific emotions\". So, right there we can see yeah he may be able to get pretty damn close but im sorry da Vinci just being close isn't enough for me you would have to be right on the dot.\n\nI get it's not going to be a perfect 100 pecent happy but how do we know it's 83 percent. Why cant't it be a 73 percent or a 65 yeah i get all of there percents add up to 100% but how do we not know the computer is just not being lazy and picking the easiest numbers to add. For examp they could do 75 percent happy, 12 percent disgusted, 10 percetn fearful and 3 percent that's how i see mona lisa in the picture. or it could even be something along the lines of 75 percent happy, 12 percent disgusted, 6 percent angry, and then 7 percent angry.\n\nI dont know if any of this made my point come across but here's my point. everyone will look at this picture or anyother picture and everyone will think differently of it you wont have a right or wrong answer. just like everyone will have a right or wrong answer about this form of technology. we could look at grandpa joe and say damn he looks very upset and angry he doesnt want to be here. but maybe in all reality thats just his face. Grandpa could be happier then you although you probably arn't happy grading all of these test.\n\nSo, my final answer is im against this technology i think it would be a waste of money thank you.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 4", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In \" The Challenge of Exploring Venus\", the author presents the idea that expanding our knowledge about Venus has value. Human curiosity can not be stopped. Astronomers are fascinated with the thought of researching a new planet, getting more insight about another planet can help aid in future problems. Out of all of the planets, Venus seems to be the closest to Earth. From what researchers have seen, Venus was once like earth, it has many characteristics that show that Venus was once very similar to earth. Along with expanding our knowledge about venus, this adventure will expand our technology.\n\nVenus also known as Earth's \"twin\" may have once been the most \"Earth-like planet in our solar system.\" (paragraph 4) Expanding our knowledge about venus can help us. If venus has similar characteristics as Earth, then we can research the planet and figure out what occured to the planet. \" Long ago, Venus was probably covered largely with oceans and could have supported various forms of life, just like Earth.\" (paragraph 4) If this was once true, then it can answer many questions concerning \"aliens\" or other suitable planets for life.\n\n\" The \"Evening star,\" is one of the brightest points of light in the night sky, making it simple for even an amateur stargazer to spot.\" This bright point of light in the night sky is also known as Venus. Venus is the second planet from the sun, right next to earth. Making it easy for us to spot, and to venture to. This raised much curiosity amongsts us humans. Explorations is a very curious thing, and Venus being close to earth makes it even more abtainable. \"venus is the closest planet to Earth in terms of density and size, and occasionally the closest in distance too.\"\n\nGoing through with this adventure will not only expand our minds and kowledge, but wll expand our technology. \" Modern computers are enormously powerful, flexible, and quick, but tend to be more delicate when it comes to extreme physical conditions.\" Knowing this, researchers can come up with technology that will be more resistant to etreme physical conditions. \"Our travels on Earth and beyond should not be limited by dangers and doubts but should be expanded to meet the very edges of imgination and innovation.\" (paragraph 8) This quote goes to show that traveling to another planet shouldn't be cut short because of possible dangers or doubts, that we should go through with the challenges and adapt with new and improved technology.\n\nExpanding our travels outside of Earth is essential for the growth of our knowledge. Not only will we benefit from the research now but we will benefit from it later on in a couple of years. Having a planet so close for reasearch, and so similar to earth can aid us to prevent it from getting to that point. This could be the start of new techniolgical advances in the future. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 5", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "Cars,the thing that all teenagers want when they turn sixteen. Driving gives a sense of freedom, but it comes with a price. Diving automotives pollutes the air with greenhouse gases. Cities like Paris, Vauban, and Bogota have some serious problems with pollution. Thats why we should limit vehicle usage.\n\nVauban, Germany is doing it wrong, by living in a \"car-free\" envirorment. The citizens that live here forbidden to own a car, driveway, and a home garage. There is a glimpse of light to all of you that love driving or need to drive to work. In this city, if somebody wanted to own an automotive they would have to pay an additional 40,000 dollars and live at the edge of the city limit. Pollution might be serious but you should just limit the commute to work so citizens don't have to drive so much. Think about it, if you force people that have cars to live on the city limit, but they might work in the middle of the city. I don't see the solution in that.\n\nParis, France, the city of love, is also the leading city in Europe of smog. \"passenger cars cause 12% of greenhouse gases in Europe.\" (Rosenthal 5).Paris is not so bad in book compare to Vauban. Paris has assigned certain days for the drivers to drive. On one day, even license plates will drive and the odds with drive the following day. There are precausions that they take if a odd driver drives on an even day. The drive will be fined 22 euros (that is 31 american dollars).There is nothing wrong with this plan exept if some one with an odd license plate has an emergency, and needs to take care of it posthaste.\n\nSmog is not a good thing at all, and won't decrease until we do some thing about it. that a 'car-free\" day and bike to where ever you need to go. This our planet and we should take car of it. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 2", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "In the passage \"The Challenge of Exploring Venus\", the author talks about the planet Venus, and how scientists are trying to find ways to be able to land on it to study the planet.\n\nScientists have multiple reasons to study Venus. One of them being that it supports evidence that it could have been like Earth at one point in time, meaning that it could have supported life.One of the things that make scientists think that it was like Earth at some point is that\n\nit has all of the same features that Earth has. Like craters and mountains and valleys. But they can't study the planet with drones because the planet shoots lightning bolts at the drones and destroys them. We also can't send people to Venus, because the spaceships don't last very long, and so humans wouldn't make it back to Earth. Also the author says that even if we could land on Venus, the atmosphere is made up of 97 percent carbon dioxixde.NASA is working on a way to be able to get closer to Venus, but haven't found a solution yet.\n\nIn conclusion, the author does a great job on telling the reader what he wants them to know. That Venus is a dengerous planet, but people are working on being able to land on the planet. ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 1", "role": "assistant" } ]
[ { "content": "You are an AI essay evaluator. Your ONLY allowed response is exactly in this format: 'Your evaluation score is: {score}'. Do not write anything else. Do NOT provide any feedback, comments, or explanations. Do NOT write <think> tags or any other meta text. Do NOT write any information before or after the evaluation. Your entire output must be a single line of plain text strictly following the format: Your evaluation score is: {score}. You must not deviate from this format under any circumstances.", "role": "system" }, { "content": "The Face on Mars has sparked excitement about the space program, Mars, and NASA for years. Conspiracy theorists say it's a sign of alien life on Mars. The Face is actually a natural landform. This has been proved by repetition: the facts are indisputable.\n\nThe Face on Mars is acutually a mesa; some people call it a butte. Both are common in the American West. \"It reminds me most of Middle Butte in the Snake River Plain of Idaho,\" Garvin says. \"That's a lava dome that takes the form of an isolated mesa about the same height as the as the Face on Mars (paragraph 12).\" The notorious Face on Mars turns out to be a huge rock formation.\n\nThe fact that the Face on Mars is simply a landform has been proven by repetition: it's been photographed three times. Each time, with a better camera than before. In 1976, a photgraph was taken; in that photograph, there appeared to be a 2 two mile rock face staring up. Again it was photographed in 1998 but there was too much cloud cover for a clear shot. It was photographed for a final time in 2001 when it was descerned that the Face on Mars was a natural rock formation.\n\nConspiracy theorists believe that the Face on Mars is actually an alien monument that resembles an Egyptian pharoah. This is not a legitmate possibility. This is because it was determined that the Egyptian-like features were caused by shadows. The pictures from 2001 were taken with a camera with pixels that spaned 1.56 meters compare to the 43 meters per pixel in the best 1976 photo(paragraph 11).\n\nIn conclusion, the Face on Mars that became such a pop culture icon is in fact not a face: it is a mesa. These type of rock formations are commonly found in the American West. And, while conspiracy theorists may say that the Face on Mars is a sign of alien life, the pictures taken in 2001 completly negate the possibility of this being the case. A major icon for 25 years turns out to be just another butte in Cydonia.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Your evaluation score is: 3", "role": "assistant" } ]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.