subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmerhumor | WizardErik | iir17hd | <|sols|><|sot|>wanna be a programmer??<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bj66nv9ewff91.png<|eol|><|sor|>A real programmer works on his side projects at home. Do you want to be a real programmer?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 120 |
programmerhumor | photenth | iir4pl7 | <|sols|><|sot|>wanna be a programmer??<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/bj66nv9ewff91.png<|eol|><|sor|>Yeah it sometimes really is like that <|eor|><|sor|>When I'm out of the door/logged out, I won't give a second thought to anything at work.
Learn this and you can live a healthier life.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 118 |
programmerhumor | HexR1se | lgvqyv | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45,299 |
programmerhumor | ts_m4 | gmtvnln | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Left out the 5 meetings and 3 documents reflecting the 10 line code change<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5,211 |
programmerhumor | hillman_avenger | gmtwjh7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Once you are salaried, you realise that more code = more to go wrong = more potential bugs = more code to test = longer code reviews.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,127 |
programmerhumor | Ace-O-Matic | gmu4h4d | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Left out the 5 meetings and 3 documents reflecting the 10 line code change<|eor|><|sor|>Don't forget playing access whack-a-mole with devops where you gain access to some services to finish the task and magically lose access other services you needed to finish the task.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,110 |
programmerhumor | Holek | gmujqgy | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Left out the 5 meetings and 3 documents reflecting the 10 line code change<|eor|><|sor|>Don't forget playing access whack-a-mole with devops where you gain access to some services to finish the task and magically lose access other services you needed to finish the task.<|eor|><|sor|>Jokes on you, I am my own devo- oh shit.<|eor|><|sor|>DevOops<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,057 |
programmerhumor | not_a_doctor_ssh | gmuaewk | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Left out the 5 meetings and 3 documents reflecting the 10 line code change<|eor|><|sor|>Don't forget playing access whack-a-mole with devops where you gain access to some services to finish the task and magically lose access other services you needed to finish the task.<|eor|><|sor|>Jokes on you, I am my own devo- oh shit.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 955 |
programmerhumor | Thetman38 | gmu0py1 | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Those 10 lines were after parsing the cryptic algorithms the lead architect wrote 15 years ago<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 831 |
programmerhumor | user124576 | gmttavv | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Is it bad I feel like the second pic as a student?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 788 |
programmerhumor | ilovebitoque | gmtybl4 | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Once you are salaried, you realise that more code = more to go wrong = more potential bugs = more code to test = longer code reviews.<|eor|><|sor|>that actually made a lot of sense... I think a lot more of the maintainability of the code I produce rather than the bulk work that I do because later on they'll call me to face the demons I've crafted<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 684 |
programmerhumor | Snow88 | gmtyng7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>In school my code usually only ever needed to handle the happy path. Rarely were we required to handle bad user input or fed up data. Also it was almost always starting from scratch vs adding or changing something without breaking 1000 other functions.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 642 |
programmerhumor | thoeoe | gmu9kb7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Those 10 lines were after parsing the cryptic algorithms the lead architect wrote 15 years ago<|eor|><|sor|>I definitely feel like a genius when, after hours of poking and prodding, I discover the 1 line of code I need to change that's 18 levels of recursion and abstraction deep<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 411 |
programmerhumor | i_carry_your_heart | gmu04gp | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Once you are salaried, you realise that more code = more to go wrong = more potential bugs = more code to test = longer code reviews.<|eor|><|sor|>that actually made a lot of sense... I think a lot more of the maintainability of the code I produce rather than the bulk work that I do because later on they'll call me to face the demons I've crafted<|eor|><|sor|>Im having this horrible moment of self-reflection based on that right now... my company has had this horribly buggy date/time related library implementation (and refuse to use an external library for reasons) and it has caused tons of bugs in my own code just because I depend on it, so I just finally sat down and rewrote it. Its... better? There are no longer the same bugs as before, but now there are different bugs. I am the problem lol<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 355 |
programmerhumor | widowhanzo | gmtvd0h | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Is it bad I feel like the second pic as a student?<|eor|><|sor|>Nope. The difference between the two isnt really student vs salaried, but passion vs no passion
Typically as a student, you get some say in what the project is. Typically as an employee, you just do whatever task is assigned.
If you are super interested in a project, youre super motivated to do it.<|eor|><|sor|>When you finish a school project you at least get a grade, maybe a nice comment from the professor. When you finish a task at work, you just pick up the next task.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 351 |
programmerhumor | christianrxd | gmu23sb | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>In school my code usually only ever needed to handle the happy path. Rarely were we required to handle bad user input or fed up data. Also it was almost always starting from scratch vs adding or changing something without breaking 1000 other functions.<|eor|><|sor|>My professors made it a point to try every possible thing to break our code. Every textbox, drop-down, and button had to have full user validation.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 282 |
programmerhumor | ThisIsBanEvasion | gmurfes | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Left out the 5 meetings and 3 documents reflecting the 10 line code change<|eor|><|sor|>Don't forget playing access whack-a-mole with devops where you gain access to some services to finish the task and magically lose access other services you needed to finish the task.<|eor|><|sor|>Jokes on you, I am my own devo- oh shit.<|eor|><|sor|>Contact my administrator?
But... That's me<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 249 |
programmerhumor | robot65536 | gmuat6m | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Left out the 5 meetings and 3 documents reflecting the 10 line code change<|eor|><|sor|>Don't forget playing access whack-a-mole with devops where you gain access to some services to finish the task and magically lose access other services you needed to finish the task.<|eor|><|sor|>And where do you leave the 10 days spend debugging why the change you made to module A make module F go up in flame without any error message?<|eor|><|sor|>Only to discover that the problem in module F was a weeks-old commit pushed by your boss without tests that somehow managed to work until now.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 236 |
programmerhumor | xSTSxZerglingOne | gmuhecm | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Left out the 5 meetings and 3 documents reflecting the 10 line code change<|eor|><|sor|>And the 4 rejected code reviews and 3 merge conflicts.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 225 |
programmerhumor | F3nix123 | gmuxm6k | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Left out the 5 meetings and 3 documents reflecting the 10 line code change<|eor|><|sor|>And the 4 rejected code reviews and 3 merge conflicts.<|eor|><|sor|>Joke on you, we only rebase and force push. Even on master and expecially on public branches. YOLO git is the best git!<|eor|><|sor|>First programming job I had, they didnt use any version control. Dragging files directly to production folders is the true YOLO move.<|eor|><|sor|>In my first programming job i was told to push to production when I finished merging my changes. A bit odd because I didnt feel it was validated well enough, but I complied. Deployed on dev, all good, then couldnt deploy to prod for some access issues. So I asked my colleague if they could help. They got all serous and asked me why did I deploy to dev if I was told to deploy to prod. Well it turns out a while back there had been an issue in prod, but dev still worked so they told the users to use that instead while prod was down, and from then on, prod was dev and dev was prod.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 223 |
programmerhumor | the_other_brand | gmtxclz | <|sols|><|sot|>Something has changed<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/pxrun0ev2og61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Is it bad I feel like the second pic as a student?<|eor|><|sor|>My experience was the same as yours. Flip the meme and that's how I feel between Student and Salaried.
When you're a student everything you work on is new, and something you've never done before. When you are salaried there is more to do, but its almost all mundane stuff you've done before.
In my senior year of college I was creating DNS servers and working with beta libraries while learning android development (like 10 years ago). Now I make dropdown boxes work by calling REST services.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 216 |
programmerhumor | tomadimitrie | ejekym | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45,270 |
programmerhumor | puplicy | fcxb4ur | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Good example of working solution that is hard to maintain.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,311 |
programmerhumor | Plungerdz | fcx6wqf | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>As funny as this meme is, I think the original picture makes sense, since the lock itself was by no means wide enough to reach both handles. Therefore, that use of scissors is high key clever.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,350 |
programmerhumor | agisten | fcx8glm | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>As funny as this meme is, I think the original picture makes sense, since the lock itself was by no means wide enough to reach both handles. Therefore, that use of scissors is high key clever.<|eor|><|sor|>It's less secure, though. The metal on the scissors is much thinner than on the padlock.<|eor|><|sor|>Ah, yes. Code security is always high priority for high level management.
/s<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,074 |
programmerhumor | epiquinnz | fcx7vpe | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>As funny as this meme is, I think the original picture makes sense, since the lock itself was by no means wide enough to reach both handles. Therefore, that use of scissors is high key clever.<|eor|><|sor|>It's less secure, though. The metal on the scissors is much thinner than on the padlock.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 719 |
programmerhumor | lime-cake | fcxb2u8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>As funny as this meme is, I think the original picture makes sense, since the lock itself was by no means wide enough to reach both handles. Therefore, that use of scissors is high key clever.<|eor|><|sor|>It's less secure, though. The metal on the scissors is much thinner than on the padlock.<|eor|><|sor|>Ah, yes. Code security is always high priority for high level management.
/s<|eor|><|sor|>I have never seem thicker sarcasm than that.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 304 |
programmerhumor | aaaqqq | fcxn4h9 | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Good example of working solution that is hard to maintain.<|eor|><|sor|>also this post needs more JPEG<|eor|><|sor|>you're saying that 23 pixels aren't enough for you?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 303 |
programmerhumor | _RIZZO_ | fcx9gv6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's staggering how often I wonder why my code works as opposed to why it doesn't.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 238 |
programmerhumor | pcoyuncy | fcxo8xl | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Good example of working solution that is hard to maintain.<|eor|><|sor|>also this post needs more JPEG<|eor|><|sor|>you're saying that 23 pixels aren't enough for you?<|eor|><|sor|>3, take it or leave it<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 154 |
programmerhumor | Drhma | fcxfa5s | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Funny it usually feels the same when reading the documentation also.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 142 |
programmerhumor | deynataggerung | fcxc8yq | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>As funny as this meme is, I think the original picture makes sense, since the lock itself was by no means wide enough to reach both handles. Therefore, that use of scissors is high key clever.<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah, the better caption is "when management gives you dumb requirements and the wrong tools for the job and you still have to make it work somehow"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 142 |
programmerhumor | acroporaguardian | fcxaoal | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>See my problem is I'd close the lock and the cabinet doors would fall off.
"Added this new thing. Crap the thing I added a year ago no longer works and it crashes randomly."<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 139 |
programmerhumor | Manofchalk | fcxa9l8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>As funny as this meme is, I think the original picture makes sense, since the lock itself was by no means wide enough to reach both handles. Therefore, that use of scissors is high key clever.<|eor|><|sor|>It's less secure, though. The metal on the scissors is much thinner than on the padlock.<|eor|><|sor|>The handles themselves are probably glued on to what is basically fibreboard. You could probably lever one off the door with a thick pair of scissors and defeat any security that relies on locking the two handles together.
So its kind of a situation where how good the locking mechanism that holds them together kind of doesn't matter to overall security so long as you cant cut it open with scissors.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 100 |
programmerhumor | LucSkyvvalker | fcxcp2d | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>As funny as this meme is, I think the original picture makes sense, since the lock itself was by no means wide enough to reach both handles. Therefore, that use of scissors is high key clever.<|eor|><|sor|>It's less secure, though. The metal on the scissors is much thinner than on the padlock.<|eor|><|sor|>The handles themselves are probably glued on to what is basically fibreboard. You could probably lever one off the door with a thick pair of scissors and defeat any security that relies on locking the two handles together.
So its kind of a situation where how good the locking mechanism that holds them together kind of doesn't matter to overall security so long as you cant cut it open with scissors.<|eor|><|sor|>Which in turn is impossible, as he locked the scissors to the cabinet.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 100 |
programmerhumor | AncientSwordRage | fcxdvbp | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>As funny as this meme is, I think the original picture makes sense, since the lock itself was by no means wide enough to reach both handles. Therefore, that use of scissors is high key clever.<|eor|><|sor|>It's less secure, though. The metal on the scissors is much thinner than on the padlock.<|eor|><|sor|>Ah, yes. Code security is always high priority for high level management.
/s<|eor|><|sor|>I have never seem thicker sarcasm than that.<|eor|><|sor|>That I cannot believe ***/s***<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 98 |
programmerhumor | brutexx | fcxu60h | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Good example of working solution that is hard to maintain.<|eor|><|sor|>also this post needs more JPEG<|eor|><|sor|>you're saying that 23 pixels aren't enough for you?<|eor|><|sor|>3, take it or leave it<|eor|><|sor|>mmmmm. I'll have 2<|eor|><|sor|>You guys are getting pixels?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 95 |
programmerhumor | CrashOpa | fcxhj2j | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Funny it usually feels the same when reading the documentation also.<|eor|><|sor|>Wait, you guys have documentation?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 92 |
programmerhumor | kyay10 | fcxh8mr | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>As funny as this meme is, I think the original picture makes sense, since the lock itself was by no means wide enough to reach both handles. Therefore, that use of scissors is high key clever.<|eor|><|sor|>It's less secure, though. The metal on the scissors is much thinner than on the padlock.<|eor|><|sor|>Ah, yes. Code security is always high priority for high level management.
/s<|eor|><|sor|>I have never seem thicker sarcasm than that.<|eor|><|sor|>This is thiccer
#/s<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 75 |
programmerhumor | veryloudmonstercat | fcxr4jx | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Good example of working solution that is hard to maintain.<|eor|><|sor|>also this post needs more JPEG<|eor|><|sor|>you're saying that 23 pixels aren't enough for you?<|eor|><|sor|>3, take it or leave it<|eor|><|sor|>mmmmm. I'll have 2<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 71 |
programmerhumor | toastee | fcxuatx | <|sols|><|sot|>Programming in a nutshell<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/08sz26e91k841.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's staggering how often I wonder why my code works as opposed to why it doesn't.<|eor|><|sor|>I love going back to a system 6 months later and asking "how the fuck did that ever work in the first place" about a small piece of code.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 70 |
programmerhumor | tonynotworking | icipa6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45,272 |
programmerhumor | MinusPi1 | g2341kj | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>Maybe it's just me but example code is always much more helpful than documentation when first learning a library.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,628 |
programmerhumor | Duuqnd | g236ex0 | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>Maybe it's just me but example code is always much more helpful than documentation when first learning a library.<|eor|><|sor|>Example code should be present in good documentation<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,340 |
programmerhumor | i_dont_sugar_coat | g22woxz | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>Oh Louie. That requires so much god damn strength and he's tall too.
EDIT : Not tall actually. I swear I saw him tower over people in videos. The mind, ey?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,062 |
programmerhumor | PIoppy | g22wig8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>If it works, it's not wrong.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 735 |
programmerhumor | madiele | g238pyb | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>Maybe it's just me but example code is always much more helpful than documentation when first learning a library.<|eor|><|sor|>Example code should be present in good documentation<|eor|><|sor|>And should show how stuff interacts with each other, sometime is like this returns stuff a stuff Is a list of things each thing is an array of bullshit
And you were there just wanting to use the say(bullshit) correctly<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 391 |
programmerhumor | nagarz | g23201t | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>That's beta breaking if I've ever seen it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 233 |
programmerhumor | mcslinplay | g233010 | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>If it works, it's not wrong.<|eor|><|sor|>If it works but you know it shouldn't<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 210 |
programmerhumor | y0urselfish | g23013u | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I love the combination of coding and bouldering. Thank you! Great content!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 199 |
programmerhumor | Caleb6801 | g2339t4 | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>It's crazy how many people here know who this is. I've never seen him in my life but have seen Atleast 5 comments about him.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 127 |
programmerhumor | Rhymezboy | g237ajl | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>If it works, it's not wrong.<|eor|><|sor|>If it works but you know it shouldn't<|eor|><|sor|>That's called "leave it the fuck alone" state<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 120 |
programmerhumor | bibimbapdroptop | g22tm95 | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>This is the way<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 100 |
programmerhumor | ruun_baboon | g232dj5 | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>That's beta breaking if I've ever seen it.<|eor|><|sor|>He solved and sent like 4 boulders in one go<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 83 |
programmerhumor | darkhunt3r | g236ri7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I love the combination of coding and bouldering. Thank you! Great content!<|eor|><|sor|>Can any one confirm for me that bouldering is one of the if not THE most popular sports for programmers? Or is it just like that in my area?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 77 |
programmerhumor | Hydraulicity | g23653u | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>If it works, it's not wrong.<|eor|><|sor|>"a problem avoided is a problem solved" - Sun Tzu, probably<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 72 |
programmerhumor | Nailcannon | g23q3mm | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>Maybe it's just me but example code is always much more helpful than documentation when first learning a library.<|eor|><|sor|>Example code should be present in good documentation<|eor|><|sor|>And should show how stuff interacts with each other, sometime is like this returns stuff a stuff Is a list of things each thing is an array of bullshit
And you were there just wanting to use the say(bullshit) correctly<|eor|><|sor|>You mean it's *not* helpful when the documentation reads
createDHRPX2t3_7- creates a DHRPX2t3_7 object
DHRPX2t3_7- an object created by the createDHRPX2t3_7 method<|eor|><|sor|>Looks like AWS docs<|eor|><|sor|>fml I spent so much time trying to write a way to generate AWSv4 sigs and looked at like a dozen different AWS articles to try to piece it together... granted CS is not my native field, I'm more front end, but stilllllll...<|eor|><|sor|>I'm a CS native and AWS docs always pissed me off. It's like handing you a box of assorted legos, telling you how many dots each piece has, and saying "now build a house". Making cloudformation templates was the worst part of my last job.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 71 |
programmerhumor | coder00000001 | g23i5go | <|sols|><|sot|>Just do your thing already<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/7hnegvajowh51.gif<|eol|><|sor|>Maybe it's just me but example code is always much more helpful than documentation when first learning a library.<|eor|><|sor|>Example code should be present in good documentation<|eor|><|sor|>This is why I hate most Golang documentation, coming from NodeJS. Most of Gos docs appear to be auto generated and are just a long list of interfaces. There are rarely any examples, let alone use cases. It makes it extremely difficult for any newb to just jump in and prototype a solution. With Node, almost every well adopted package has a dozen or more examples, often with multiple e2e/use cases that align with *why* the package was created to begin with.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 60 |
programmerhumor | Mr_Reddington88 | x2etws | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45,187 |
programmerhumor | just-bair | imj38s7 | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>When the tutorial is 3 years old and uses functions that no longer exist<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,971 |
programmerhumor | Manitcor | imjbuvf | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>read tutorial 20 times, realize the opening paragraph hints at a 3rd party framework the author expected you had installed.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,734 |
programmerhumor | King-Cobra-668 | imjk9jz | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>When the tutorial is 3 years old and uses functions that no longer exist<|eor|><|sor|>the fact that functions are obsolete in 3 years is probably why everything works like absolute shit these days
the rampant overt cheating I saw when in university for computer science and engineering is probably why as well...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 924 |
programmerhumor | Uncommented-Code | imjlg65 | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>read tutorial 20 times, realize the opening paragraph hints at a 3rd party framework the author expected you had installed.<|eor|><|sor|>> realize the opening paragraph hints at a 3rd party framework the author expected you had installed.
God I hate this so much. Especially if the 3rd party framework isn't even really necessary and the author just uses it because... who the fuck knows why.
And it gets even worse if you have certain restrictions. I try to limit my usage of libraries for a multitude of reasons and sometimes I literally can't use them. So I scream everytime I read a stackoverflow question on 'is there a better way to do x' and the answers are 'just install this and that and those dependencies and then use that one function'.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 789 |
programmerhumor | TheGrimGriefer3 | imj2dmq | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>IDE in the tutorial: works
IDE when I try to install it: no<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 501 |
programmerhumor | Scipio11 | imjxb3j | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>read tutorial 20 times, realize the opening paragraph hints at a 3rd party framework the author expected you had installed.<|eor|><|sor|>> realize the opening paragraph hints at a 3rd party framework the author expected you had installed.
God I hate this so much. Especially if the 3rd party framework isn't even really necessary and the author just uses it because... who the fuck knows why.
And it gets even worse if you have certain restrictions. I try to limit my usage of libraries for a multitude of reasons and sometimes I literally can't use them. So I scream everytime I read a stackoverflow question on 'is there a better way to do x' and the answers are 'just install this and that and those dependencies and then use that one function'.<|eor|><|sor|>Oh my god I run into this so much with PowerShell (don't @ me I use the native Active Directory and Azure functions). Some motherfucker uploads 2000 lines of code to PSGallery and I only need ~10 different lines from it. But it's so bloated and trashed from revisions that I have to peel it apart for like an hour to get what I need.
And of course every stack overflow and Microsoft community post is like "I use powershellgallery.com/packages/hot_garbage, never needed anything else " [question has been answered, comments are now locked]<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 295 |
programmerhumor | snacksy13 | imj7y75 | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>All code tutorials should have GitHub repos of the example. That way people can send pull request and issues if something goes wrong<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 288 |
programmerhumor | Highlight_Expensive | imjlzzw | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>When the tutorial is 3 years old and uses functions that no longer exist<|eor|><|sor|>the fact that functions are obsolete in 3 years is probably why everything works like absolute shit these days
the rampant overt cheating I saw when in university for computer science and engineering is probably why as well...<|eor|><|sor|>I mean I dont cheat because I find the theory side interesting but lets not pretend that much, if any, of what is learned in school is useful towards work. Industry is entirely different from the theoretical side that is taught in school.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 286 |
programmerhumor | Pentagon_TheRealOne | imiyw2a | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Me hoping, a restart would fix it:<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 283 |
programmerhumor | just-bair | imjb53d | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>When the tutorial is 3 years old and uses functions that no longer exist<|eor|><|sor|>Just don't use libraries and languages that randomly delete functions.<|eor|><|sor|>"Just dont use libraries"
Oh yes that sounds reasonable<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 171 |
programmerhumor | Lv_InSaNe_vL | imk6zvt | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>read tutorial 20 times, realize the opening paragraph hints at a 3rd party framework the author expected you had installed.<|eor|><|sor|>> realize the opening paragraph hints at a 3rd party framework the author expected you had installed.
God I hate this so much. Especially if the 3rd party framework isn't even really necessary and the author just uses it because... who the fuck knows why.
And it gets even worse if you have certain restrictions. I try to limit my usage of libraries for a multitude of reasons and sometimes I literally can't use them. So I scream everytime I read a stackoverflow question on 'is there a better way to do x' and the answers are 'just install this and that and those dependencies and then use that one function'.<|eor|><|sor|>Oh my god I run into this so much with PowerShell (don't @ me I use the native Active Directory and Azure functions). Some motherfucker uploads 2000 lines of code to PSGallery and I only need ~10 different lines from it. But it's so bloated and trashed from revisions that I have to peel it apart for like an hour to get what I need.
And of course every stack overflow and Microsoft community post is like "I use powershellgallery.com/packages/hot_garbage, never needed anything else " [question has been answered, comments are now locked]<|eor|><|sor|>God I hate how you google something related to powershell and the only two answers are "read the docs" or "here is a 2000 line program"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 166 |
programmerhumor | throwaway_mpq_fan | imj8y3m | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>IDE in the tutorial: works
IDE when I try to install it: no<|eor|><|sor|>That's my past experience with Eclipse. Not all of them are like that.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 156 |
programmerhumor | -tired_old_man- | imjmk7m | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>read tutorial 20 times, realize the opening paragraph hints at a 3rd party framework the author expected you had installed.<|eor|><|sor|>My favorite is --
Tutorial author spends 3 paragraphs explaining something simple like the difference between single quotes vs double quotes, complete with screenshots and examples.... But completely glosses over critical information about the language or framework that is required.
I mean I still appreciate it, but its just funny to me.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 145 |
programmerhumor | Kiljab | imj0fxg | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Always check the date of the tutorial, more then a few months and it's worthless<|eor|><|sor|>Laughs in C<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 139 |
programmerhumor | Jack__Squat | imjtawb | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>When the tutorial is 3 years old and uses functions that no longer exist<|eor|><|sor|>the fact that functions are obsolete in 3 years is probably why everything works like absolute shit these days
the rampant overt cheating I saw when in university for computer science and engineering is probably why as well...<|eor|><|sor|>I mean I dont cheat because I find the theory side interesting but lets not pretend that much, if any, of what is learned in school is useful towards work. Industry is entirely different from the theoretical side that is taught in school.<|eor|><|sor|>It was extremely useful to me. It teaches you how to think in a certain way. If I'm working on a legacy codebase where no modern libraries are compatible, I can build my own sorting algorithms, state machines, trees, linked lists, whatever I need.
Also it's good for debugging low level errors, diagnosing memory leaks, etc. It's good for a lot of things. I programmed before I got my CS degree but I was a completely different programmer after.
Easily the best money I've ever spent.<|eor|><|sor|>The best programming class I ever took was "Programming Concepts" where everything was done in pseudo-code. Taught me how to think in a different way. Everything else is just learning the syntax.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 136 |
programmerhumor | Alvtu | imiyzk3 | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Always check the date of the tutorial, more then a few months and it's worthless<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 135 |
programmerhumor | camxct | imjeqkw | <|sols|><|sot|>It just keeps happening<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/gyufhogm52l91.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Me hoping, a restart would fix it:<|eor|><|sor|>Aw fuck, Windows Updates...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 112 |
programmerhumor | Kaze_Senshi | j2oj7l | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45,125 |
programmerhumor | noahhammons | g76z6lx | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>If only you could program with confirm ejects: on.<|eor|><|sor|>Or at least visual tasks so you know specific lines are OK<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 498 |
programmerhumor | ForceBru | g76wdid | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Finally a new meme format on r/ProgrammerHumor!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 373 |
programmerhumor | Lyndis_Caelin | g77izhp | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>If only you could program with confirm ejects: on.<|eor|><|sor|>Or at least visual tasks so you know specific lines are OK<|eor|><|sor|>Isn't that what debugging and putting little print statements in the code is for?
(little `print("line 108 was not An Imposter")` or something, when it doesn't run that line's looking sus)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 293 |
programmerhumor | FinalRun | g779hua | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>*New bug* reported by tester<|eor|><|sor|>Emergency standup<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 200 |
programmerhumor | lear85 | g76xafw | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I'd be all for ejecting line 323
If the code were longer than 60 lines.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 184 |
programmerhumor | mfb- | g7786be | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Line 31 was not a bug. 14 bugs remain.
Line 45 was a bug. 23 bugs remain.<|eor|><|sor|>If you eject lines you'll first play that game with compiler errors.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 176 |
programmerhumor | Jamesherbert24 | g76zda8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Finally a new meme format on r/ProgrammerHumor!<|eor|><|sor|>It's kinda refreshing to see something new rather than a deepfried repost from 2016.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 167 |
programmerhumor | TheSchred | g76wgc8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>*New bug* reported by tester<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 151 |
programmerhumor | AndyTheSane | g7750oq | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>All lines have been ejected. Seven bugs remain.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 144 |
programmerhumor | TheyStoleMyNameBro | g77coyb | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>If only you could program with confirm ejects: on.<|eor|><|sor|>It's called "testing", you should try it.<|eor|><|sor|>Ensuring what I write actually does what I think it does? Preposterous<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 131 |
programmerhumor | Sir_Applecheese | g77nmw4 | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>If only you could program with confirm ejects: on.<|eor|><|sor|>Or at least visual tasks so you know specific lines are OK<|eor|><|sor|>Isn't that what debugging and putting little print statements in the code is for?
(little `print("line 108 was not An Imposter")` or something, when it doesn't run that line's looking sus)<|eor|><|sor|>The print statement is the only debugging I need, but I barely know how to program...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 129 |
programmerhumor | randomcitizen42 | g77b4rh | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>If only you could program with confirm ejects: on.<|eor|><|sor|>It's called "testing", you should try it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 113 |
programmerhumor | hntddt1 | g77dvs4 | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Line 31 was not a bug. 14 bugs remain.
Line 45 was a bug. 23 bugs remain.<|eor|><|sor|>If you eject lines you'll first play that game with compiler errors.<|eor|><|sor|>Line 9 looks sus and showed you a yellow warning<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 72 |
programmerhumor | Chris857 | g7785tb | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Sort of out of the loop, I think "suspect" or "suspicious".<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 68 |
programmerhumor | NIL_VALUE | g785n1b | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>If only you could program with confirm ejects: on.<|eor|><|sor|>Or at least visual tasks so you know specific lines are OK<|eor|><|sor|>Isn't that what debugging and putting little print statements in the code is for?
(little `print("line 108 was not An Imposter")` or something, when it doesn't run that line's looking sus)<|eor|><|sor|>The print statement is the only debugging I need, but I barely know how to program...<|eor|><|sor|>*proceeds to know how to programm 5 languages*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 67 |
programmerhumor | Mr2_Wei | g78ccag | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>If only you could program with confirm ejects: on.<|eor|><|sor|>Or at least visual tasks so you know specific lines are OK<|eor|><|sor|>Isn't that what debugging and putting little print statements in the code is for?
(little `print("line 108 was not An Imposter")` or something, when it doesn't run that line's looking sus)<|eor|><|sor|>The print statement is the only debugging I need, but I barely know how to program...<|eor|><|sor|>*proceeds to know how to programm 5 languages*<|eor|><|sor|>Skill level: Hello World<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 67 |
programmerhumor | KCBandWagon | g77m44b | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Line 31 was not a bug. 14 bugs remain.
Line 45 was a bug. 23 bugs remain.<|eor|><|sor|>No errors.
Add line of code
17 errors.
Remove the line you added
17 errors.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 66 |
programmerhumor | omgFWTbear | g77fl1a | <|sols|><|sot|>Compiler Warning : Line 323 is kinda sus<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/q9cov32d2bq51.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>If only you could program with confirm ejects: on.<|eor|><|sor|>It's called "testing", you should try it.<|eor|><|sor|>Ensuring what I write actually does what I think it does? Preposterous<|eor|><|sor|>Im sure youve heard of Systems Hungarian Notation, as well as Apps.
Allow me to introduce Bear Hungarian Notation, which has made all of my code self documenting, as well. Its very easy, too.
I prefix all my variable names (such as InputDate) with CompilerWarningGenerator so its CompilerWarningGeneratorInputDate (for example) and sure enough, I always get compiler warnings, slap a commit on that bad boy and call it a day.
I am the most productive programmer at my firm by far.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 53 |
programmerhumor | Caffeine-Coder | n3p4e2 | <|sols|><|sot|>Confused screams<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/wudbck9rhuw61.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45,116 |
programmerhumor | eyekwah2 | gwrej56 | <|sols|><|sot|>Confused screams<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/wudbck9rhuw61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Manager: "But now a window comes up saying that program.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close. Could you take a look at that?"
Me: \*disables window bug reporting\*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,437 |
programmerhumor | RussellFighter | gwr3rsh | <|sols|><|sot|>Confused screams<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/wudbck9rhuw61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The story said "when they click the button the app should be gone".
I just took the shortest path to the objective.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,804 |
programmerhumor | Evo_Kaer | gwrh8wc | <|sols|><|sot|>Confused screams<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/wudbck9rhuw61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Manager: "But now a window comes up saying that program.exe has encountered a problem and needs to close. Could you take a look at that?"
Me: \*disables window bug reporting\*<|eor|><|sor|>Reminds me of Wing Commander. On exiting the game, it would cause a memory error. And since they had no time to fix it, they just changed the error message to
"Thanks for playing Wing Commander"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,195 |
programmerhumor | BoringIncident | gwrhba7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Confused screams<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/wudbck9rhuw61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I swear for the longest time whenever I clicked Exit Game on Heroes of the Storm it gave me a notification saying the program crashed. You can't convince me they didn't do exactly this.<|eor|><|sor|>I've heard of a game that crashed when you saved it. So the developers renamed the button from "Save" to "Save and exit".
It's a feature, not a bug :)
Edit: Spelling<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,019 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.