subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmingcirclejerk | marmakoide | fzyh9m5 | <|sols|><|sot|>deleted everything ... expunging this godforsaken product from the Earth<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/ryxcommar/fullstackexcel/pull/2<|eol|><|sor|>Think of all that workforce you can leverage with such a tool, it's genius<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | fzzlgc7 | <|sols|><|sot|>deleted everything ... expunging this godforsaken product from the Earth<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/ryxcommar/fullstackexcel/pull/2<|eol|><|sor|>Think of all that workforce you can leverage with such a tool, it's genius<|eor|><|soopr|>so many wageslaves can now wageslave harder<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5 |
programmingcirclejerk | TheLastMeritocrat | gv7vgt | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 147 |
programmingcirclejerk | xereleo | fsneinp | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|sor|>"Lisp is a computer science student's attempt to attain the same level of unemployability as that of Mathematics students"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 74 |
programmingcirclejerk | RAKtheUndead | fsn2cxo | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|sor|>That's why Scheme is better than Common Lisp. And if you already got into Scheme, you know - block scoping, hygienic macros - why not try Rust?<|eor|><|sor|>lol having to compile your code
What is this, 1972?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 38 |
programmingcirclejerk | TheLastMeritocrat | fsmwnwb | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|soopr|>I don't disagree of course.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | ToxicPilot | fsn63xh | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|sor|>*Scheme has entered the chat.*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | TheCommieDuck | fso4c1w | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|soopr|>I don't disagree of course.<|eoopr|><|sor|>Who would win - monads, or defmacro and a bunch of curly bois?<|eor|><|sor|>defmacro is just a monoid in the category of curly bois<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | Adolora | fsnm3fw | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|sor|>Eww. Manufactured jerk.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | xeveri | fspgv1e | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|sor|>Functional languages are cute and all, until you need to actually build software, then you choose C++.<|eor|><|sor|>It's 2020, why would you choose C++ over Rust which has:
- fearless concurrency
- zero-cost abstractions
- move semantics
- guaranteed memory safety
- threads without data races
- trait-based generics
- fearless concurrency
- pattern matching
- type inference
- minimal runtime
- efficient C bindings
?<|eor|><|sor|>Yes. But it would be better to start with C++, then attempt to rewrite in Rust while blogging about it. Thats how you get a standing ovation from the crowd.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | m50d | fsomr6v | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|sor|>That's why Scheme is better than Common Lisp. And if you already got into Scheme, you know - block scoping, hygienic macros - why not try Rust?<|eor|><|sor|>Lol no HKT.<|eor|><|soopr|>[lol already yes HKTs (even without direct GATs support)](https://github.com/edmundsmith/type-plugs)<|eoopr|><|sor|>I mean that's like saying Java has pattern matching because it has the visitor pattern. I'm having to do that kind of crap in Kotlin right now at work, it's bloody awful.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | blbrd30 | fsorlkr | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|sor|>"Lisp is a computer science student's attempt to attain the same level of unemployability as that of Mathematics students"<|eor|><|sor|>Can confirm
Am ex math student<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | officerthegeek | fsqgd79 | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|sor|>Functional languages are cute and all, until you need to actually build software, then you choose C++.<|eor|><|sor|>As a full time haskell dev I'm confused by this assertion<|eor|><|sor|>Every Haskal dev is fully time Haskal dev. The subtle difference you might not really care for is that others are employed by a business and paid to program.<|eor|><|sor|>I obviously get paid lmao. Good joke tho.<|eor|><|sor|>look, we're not your parents, you don't have to lie to us, we know haskal devs are unemployed<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | m50d | fspgvsj | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|sor|>That's why Scheme is better than Common Lisp. And if you already got into Scheme, you know - block scoping, hygienic macros - why not try Rust?<|eor|><|sor|>Lol no HKT.<|eor|><|soopr|>[lol already yes HKTs (even without direct GATs support)](https://github.com/edmundsmith/type-plugs)<|eoopr|><|sor|>I mean that's like saying Java has pattern matching because it has the visitor pattern. I'm having to do that kind of crap in Kotlin right now at work, it's bloody awful.<|eor|><|soopr|>It's not a final usable solution. It's just a demo of what can be already done in today's Rust. It serves as a stop-gap response for when an internet writes "lol no HKTs", until [real GATs support](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44265) gets implemented and stable.<|eoopr|><|sor|>So the Rust equivalent of interface{} and Canadian aboriginal syllabics.
PS lol no kind polymorphism.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | m50d | fsoi9g1 | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|sor|>That's why Scheme is better than Common Lisp. And if you already got into Scheme, you know - block scoping, hygienic macros - why not try Rust?<|eor|><|sor|>Lol no HKT.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | fsooxo0 | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|sor|>Eww. Manufactured jerk.<|eor|><|sor|>Just doesn't taste the same...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | sebamestre | fsp9qde | <|sols|><|sot|>LISP was initially based on fundamental misunderstandings of the -calculus, and predated the typed -calculus. Any sufficiently-repaired LISP implementation (static scoping, laziness, static typing) comprises an informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of of Haskell.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/rustjerk/comments/guum6u/it_is_all_rust_in_the_end/fskt49e/<|eol|><|sor|>Functional languages are cute and all, until you need to actually build software, then you choose C++.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
I am currently writing a compiler in C++. It's ok, not nearly as bad as I anticipated.
/rj
RAII is all the GC I need<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | leijurv | gitca9 | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 148 |
programmingcirclejerk | Zillux | fqgrr8o | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine if GNU `yes` had been written in GO. How many more yes'es would have been printed? How much more positivity would there be in our world today?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 119 |
programmingcirclejerk | anatolya | fqgw01v | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>Nah. My favorite are command line utilities that has *nothing* to do with web development yet written in node.js and needs to be installed with npm.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 94 |
programmingcirclejerk | anatolya | fqhac2v | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>Nah. My favorite are command line utilities that has *nothing* to do with web development yet written in node.js and needs to be installed with npm.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj I found a program that's like cowsay but for the party parrot. It uses Node.
It takes between 0.4 and 0.5 seconds to run.
I rewrote it in Python. Now it takes 0.03 to 0.05 seconds.
I also rewrote it in C, which is ultra fast, but it was segfaulting on Unicode at one point and I'm scared<|eor|><|sor|>> I also rewrote it in C, which is ultra fast, but it was segfaulting on Unicode at one point and I'm scared
You moved fast and broke things. There's nothing to be scared of<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 70 |
programmingcirclejerk | CthaehRiddles | fqgvysz | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>> Rust also has more potential for performance scaling in this space, but with the "if you have the time for that" kind of caveat
Trading in your morality for only a few extra hundred hours in compile time. How shameful. I couldn't look myself in the mirror knowing that.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 62 |
programmingcirclejerk | etherealeminence | fqh8ui0 | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>Nah. My favorite are command line utilities that has *nothing* to do with web development yet written in node.js and needs to be installed with npm.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj I found a program that's like cowsay but for the party parrot. It uses Node.
It takes between 0.4 and 0.5 seconds to run.
I rewrote it in Python. Now it takes 0.03 to 0.05 seconds.
I also rewrote it in C, which is ultra fast, but it was segfaulting on Unicode at one point and I'm scared<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 51 |
programmingcirclejerk | Tiberiuss7 | fqgx00s | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>Nah. My favorite are command line utilities that has *nothing* to do with web development yet written in node.js and needs to be installed with npm.<|eor|><|sor|>everyone is occupied with the snap vs flatpack debate, when the one true way of software distribution is npm<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 42 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | fqgxh86 | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine if GNU `yes` had been written in GO. How many more yes'es would have been printed? How much more positivity would there be in our world today?<|eor|><|sor|>Our programmers are not researchers. They are 0.1xers. Therefore it only prints 0.1x yes.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | SelfDistinction | fqho3h8 | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>Nah. My favorite are command line utilities that has *nothing* to do with web development yet written in node.js and needs to be installed with npm.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj I found a program that's like cowsay but for the party parrot. It uses Node.
It takes between 0.4 and 0.5 seconds to run.
I rewrote it in Python. Now it takes 0.03 to 0.05 seconds.
I also rewrote it in C, which is ultra fast, but it was segfaulting on Unicode at one point and I'm scared<|eor|><|sor|>Hey you know which language handles unicode perfectly and is also moral and fearlessly concurrent?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 33 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | fqh40hn | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>"I'm not in a cult", says the C++ programmer.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32 |
programmingcirclejerk | anatolya | fqgzaja | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>Nah. My favorite are command line utilities that has *nothing* to do with web development yet written in node.js and needs to be installed with npm.<|eor|><|sor|>everyone is occupied with the snap vs flatpack debate, when the one true way of software distribution is npm<|eor|><|sor|>Classic case of suits slinging shit at each other trying to justify their existence while young and dynamic web boys are moving fast and getting shit done<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 29 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | fqgxipr | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>> Rust also has more potential for performance scaling in this space, but with the "if you have the time for that" kind of caveat
Trading in your morality for only a few extra hundred hours in compile time. How shameful. I couldn't look myself in the mirror knowing that.<|eor|><|sor|>Rust is morality, Go is taboo<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | IEatLegosOnPurpose | fqhftpg | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Go? More like No<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | somewhataccurate | fqh1g5t | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Dude we jerk to Go almost daily<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | albgr03 | fqgxi46 | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine if GNU `yes` had been written in GO. How many more yes'es would have been printed? How much more positivity would there be in our world today?<|eor|><|sor|>y<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | covercash2 | fqheuyv | <|sols|><|sot|>These days when I see a fast, reliable CLI tool I think "this has got to be written in Go"<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23163858<|eol|><|sor|>Nah. My favorite are command line utilities that has *nothing* to do with web development yet written in node.js and needs to be installed with npm.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj I found a program that's like cowsay but for the party parrot. It uses Node.
It takes between 0.4 and 0.5 seconds to run.
I rewrote it in Python. Now it takes 0.03 to 0.05 seconds.
I also rewrote it in C, which is ultra fast, but it was segfaulting on Unicode at one point and I'm scared<|eor|><|sor|>You know what to do<|eor|><|sor|>*[claw clicking intensifies]*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | tontoto | g99ip0 | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 145 |
programmingcirclejerk | Kryptochef | fosn7ah | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>A haskalar, a software engineer and a sex worker walk into a bar. The software engineer proceeds to trade his money for the sex worker's services. After the transaction is completed he has learned all kinds of new stuff. Meanwhile, the haskalar has finished writing a particularly important blog entry detailing how the Yoneda lemma is basically equivalent to a function he once wrote while trying to sort a list without modifying it. He has no money to trade for sex, and besides that is sworn to purity. All three leave the bar feeling miserable, discontent with the state of the industry they are working in, except for the haskalar who doesn't work at all.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 88 |
programmingcirclejerk | usernameqwerty003 | fos242n | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>Sounds like something a jerk would say.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 73 |
programmingcirclejerk | OctagonClock | fos97ib | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>NOO YOU CAN'T JUST STICK TO WHAT YOU KNOW YOU HAVE TO CHANGE YOUR STACK EVERY YEAR OR IT'S NOT MODERN AND YOU WON'T GET A JOB AND EVERYONE WILL LAUGH BECAUSE YOU'RE OUTDATED
haha jinja2 template goes brrrrr<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 70 |
programmingcirclejerk | logicchains | fotco0z | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>A haskalar, a software engineer and a sex worker walk into a bar. The software engineer proceeds to trade his money for the sex worker's services. After the transaction is completed he has learned all kinds of new stuff. Meanwhile, the haskalar has finished writing a particularly important blog entry detailing how the Yoneda lemma is basically equivalent to a function he once wrote while trying to sort a list without modifying it. He has no money to trade for sex, and besides that is sworn to purity. All three leave the bar feeling miserable, discontent with the state of the industry they are working in, except for the haskalar who doesn't work at all.<|eor|><|sor|>\> haskalar who doesn't work at all.
C'mon, pizza delivery is a real job.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 41 |
programmingcirclejerk | ur_waifus_prolapse | fosdsgz | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>And regardless of what you do, you still get fucked for a paycheck. Simile holds up.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | LasseF-H | fos7uy8 | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>Sounds like something a jerk would say.<|eor|><|sor|>Who is this jerk you speak of? Is it a 10xer named Circle Jerk?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | lulzmachine | fotq9zl | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>A haskalar, a software engineer and a sex worker walk into a bar. The software engineer proceeds to trade his money for the sex worker's services. After the transaction is completed he has learned all kinds of new stuff. Meanwhile, the haskalar has finished writing a particularly important blog entry detailing how the Yoneda lemma is basically equivalent to a function he once wrote while trying to sort a list without modifying it. He has no money to trade for sex, and besides that is sworn to purity. All three leave the bar feeling miserable, discontent with the state of the industry they are working in, except for the haskalar who doesn't work at all.<|eor|><|sor|>As a wise man once said, "Haskell doesn't have any side-effects, because nobody uses it"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | doomvox | fosk2ur | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>That would be a great title for a talk. When's the next Ruby conference?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | voidvector | fotsk41 | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>This is why I prefer Go, it is easier to swallow than Rust.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | BillyIII | fot4gyl | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>Pfft. I'm not some measly "engineer", I'm an Artisan and a Visionary.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | usernameqwerty004 | fotphc3 | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>Sounds like something a jerk would say.<|eor|><|sor|>Who is this jerk you speak of? Is it a 10xer named Circle Jerk?<|eor|><|sor|>In every man's heart there are two jerks - one with a circle and one with a square. Will you be there, in the circle, or will you be square? That depends on which jerk you Twitter feed.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | dscottboggs | fou3v67 | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>NOO YOU CAN'T JUST STICK TO WHAT YOU KNOW YOU HAVE TO CHANGE YOUR STACK EVERY YEAR OR IT'S NOT MODERN AND YOU WON'T GET A JOB AND EVERYONE WILL LAUGH BECAUSE YOU'RE OUTDATED
haha jinja2 template goes brrrrr<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Good God, what *is* that??<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | PM_ME_YOUR_KANT | foujerc | <|sols|><|sot|>" An engineer who doesn't like learning new stuff is like a sex workers that doesn't like giving head"<|eot|><|sol|>https://np.reddit.com/r/javascript/comments/g98k5d/a_critique_of_react_hooks/<|eol|><|sor|>Webshits go literally one hour without making wildly innapropriate, hackneyed sex metaphors challenge 2020<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | git_commit_-m_sudoku | et6mpi | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 147 |
programmingcirclejerk | carbolymer | ffesspl | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>can't jerk, webshit is a dumpster fire<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 94 |
programmingcirclejerk | janusz_chytrus | ffet8ee | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>I'm so fucking happy I'm not doing webdev.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 66 |
programmingcirclejerk | _babu_ | ffeugif | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>I mean, if you're using any software first-implemented by Google and expect it to work in a year from now, you're fucking delusional.
/uj This but unironically<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 58 |
programmingcirclejerk | ur_waifus_prolapse | fff1z6x | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>can't jerk, w3c and chrome are consistently in over their heads with this bullshit<|eor|><|sor|>We should rewrite chrome in golang and that should fix all our problems, specifically the problem of having too much ram.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 52 |
programmingcirclejerk | jacques_chester | ffex9fi | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 41 |
programmingcirclejerk | tpgreyknight | ffeuept | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>How desktop standards work:
1. design a flawed API
2. ship it in the most-used desktop operating system
3. try to replace it with something that is actually usable
4. oops, too late, that would break my workflow<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 41 |
programmingcirclejerk | tpgreyknight | ffex6jz | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>How desktop standards work:
1. design a flawed API
2. ship it in the most-used desktop operating system
3. try to replace it with something that is actually usable
4. oops, too late, that would break my workflow<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Nice try, but we all know the real story.
How multithreading works:
1. It doesn't.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 41 |
programmingcirclejerk | i9srpeg | ffff7m6 | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?<|eor|><|sor|>The real jerk was the friends you made along the way.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | ponybau5 | fff67bd | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
Google is so shady when it comes to using their sites on none chrome browsers. There's no excuse as to why half the shit "isn't supported" and things taking much longer to load.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | Adolora | fff9hcu | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>How desktop standards work:
1. design a flawed API
2. ship it in the most-used desktop operating system
3. try to replace it with something that is actually usable
4. oops, too late, that would break my workflow<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Nice try, but we all know the real story.
How multithreading works:
1. It doesn't.<|eor|><|sor|>How people think multithreading works
[ image of puppies each eating from their own bowl.jpg ]
How it actually works
[ image of puppies all over the place.jpg ]<|eor|><|sor|>If you replace the puppies with gophers it would work.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | silentconfessor | fffbhmi | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>You have a moral obligation to use Firefox for the sole reason that it isn't Chrome. It's also very good, but that's irrelevant.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | Ohhnoes | fffkw70 | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>can't jerk, w3c and chrome are consistently in over their heads with this bullshit<|eor|><|sor|>We should rewrite chrome in golang and that should fix all our problems, specifically the problem of having too much ram.<|eor|><|sor|>Immoral-programming language detected<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | spookthesunset | fffcxql | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>How desktop standards work:
1. design a flawed API
2. ship it in the most-used desktop operating system
3. try to replace it with something that is actually usable
4. oops, too late, that would break my workflow<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Nice try, but we all know the real story.
How multithreading works:
1. It doesn't.<|eor|><|sor|>How people think multithreading works
[ image of puppies each eating from their own bowl.jpg ]
How it actually works
[ image of puppies all over the place.jpg ]<|eor|><|sor|>Sorry, jpeg is not a supported format on my VT-100 console.
Besides, threading is bloat that everybody uses to be hip and trendy but is almost never needed. I cant think of a single program that would benefit from multithreading.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | tpgreyknight | fff01wb | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>How desktop standards work:
1. design a flawed API
2. ship it in the most-used desktop operating system
3. try to replace it with something that is actually usable
4. oops, too late, that would break my workflow<|eor|><|sor|>You talking about GNOME or something?<|eor|><|sor|>> ship it in the most-used desktop operating system
GNOME is the first thing that comes to my mind, too<|eor|><|sor|>I actually meant systemd.<|eor|><|sor|>> most-used desktop operating system
C:\> wsl
bmarkovic:wsl$ systemctl start apache
System has not been booted with systemd as init system (PID 1). Can't operate.
I mean it *has been shipped with it* alright, but I doubt it affects anyone's workflow.<|eor|><|sor|>I was joking about systemd being an operating system, but thank you for informing me about how the horrible hellworld we inhabit is even more hideous than I imagined.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | kz393 | ffeuanu | <|sols|><|sot|>How Web Standards Work: 1. design a flawed API 2. ship it in the most-used browser 3. get working group to fix the API 4. oops, too late, that would break the web<|eot|><|sol|>https://mobile.twitter.com/Rich_Harris/status/1220412711768666114<|eol|><|sor|>let's add a styleshiit to aSS<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | clarkinum | arkbv3 | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 150 |
programmingcirclejerk | Camto | egnryy0 | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>Of course, there's a Richard Kenneth Eng answer completely dismissing the question and promoting Smalltalk.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 100 |
programmingcirclejerk | defunkydrummer | egnt2bb | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>Of course, there's a Richard Kenneth Eng answer completely dismissing the question and promoting Smalltalk.<|eor|><|sor|>>Richard Kenneth Eng answer completely dismissing the question and promoting Smalltalk.
Come on, let's not make fun of the only living Smalltalk user.
<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 81 |
programmingcirclejerk | pcjftw | egnusga | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>look motherf*cker, we employ you to shovel code like a good little gopher, we don't pay you to do mathematical wankery!!!
Go play with your prolapse profunctors on you own dime you freak!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 62 |
programmingcirclejerk | chadtology | egnv1jy | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>That idiot is almost certainly a gopher-sympathizing concern troll. He's so pathetic that he feels the need to pretend he is someone else in order to validate his opinions.
He already knows the answers he wants, that's why he asks a leading question. He just wants those answers to be stated by others so he can feel validated. Imagine being so pathetic that you rely on the feedback of random idiots on the internet to feel better.
Usually these kinds of trolls only appear over polarizing topics such as political or religious beliefs, but apparently gophers find programming language concepts such as generics polarizing.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | 28f272fe556a1363cc31 | ego1xqr | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>> its Rust.
Recursive jerk. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | allKnowingHagrid | ego5mmz | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>Of course, there's a Richard Kenneth Eng answer completely dismissing the question and promoting Smalltalk.<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah, what's the deal with that? Has he taken it as his sole job to bring back Smalltalk?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | Camto | ego5uba | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>Of course, there's a Richard Kenneth Eng answer completely dismissing the question and promoting Smalltalk.<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah, what's the deal with that? Has he taken it as his sole job to bring back Smalltalk?<|eor|><|sor|>https://medium.com/@richardeng/domo-arigato-mr-smalltalk-aa84e245beb9<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | defunkydrummer | egp9huo | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>Of course, there's a Richard Kenneth Eng answer completely dismissing the question and promoting Smalltalk.<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah, what's the deal with that? Has he taken it as his sole job to bring back Smalltalk?<|eor|><|sor|>>Yeah, what's the deal with that? Has he taken it as his sole job to bring back Smalltalk?
/UNJERK
He's really annoying. I got into a small flame war with him because he was pooh-poing Lisp ("the greatest single programming language ever invented" according to Smalltalk creator Alan Kay), until by his own confession he admitted not knowing Lisp at all.
<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | Snepsts | egoguup | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
​
Quora often has some of the dumbest questions because people will ask a question they want to answer and then log on to their account and answer it.
​
A lot of the answers feel really well thought out but they also feel kinda artificial, like these people have been sitting on their thoughts for weeks just waiting to preach, and this site lets them create an anonymous straw-man to ask the odd, if not unusually dumb, question so they can spill out their weird constipated shit on the internet.
​
/rj
​
I wish my CTO would change us over to Scala. He likes to complain about compilation time and mentions something about each file needing 5 passes... Does he not understand the complexity of the language? The compiler just needs to take some time to appreciate and understand the beauty of the language.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | wubscale | ego0tcq | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>You are complecting again Jimmy.<|eor|><|sor|>`(jvm (stacktraces (*intensify*)))`<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | europeanbro | egok11e | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>> I am professional programmer and good experience with many programming languages,
> Without taking your enough time letme share some tips..
> 1st of all explore yourself the programming language you are going to choose is just a trend/hype or its really worth. GoLang is just a hype like few other langs created by some multinational brands just to addict developers and make more customers and convince them play within there limited product based features.
> Try to find your solution in the following langs
> C++, C, php, Java, JavaScript, phython
> Others almost all langs are brand specific like c#, swift, kotlin, .net, scala, golang etc
> Now if you are forced to choose between golang or scala then i will recommend go with scala, cause golang is not mature as scala..
> For more details you can contact me
> LinkedIn
"Senior Software Architect at Netflix"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | defunkydrummer | egpax55 | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
​
Quora often has some of the dumbest questions because people will ask a question they want to answer and then log on to their account and answer it.
​
A lot of the answers feel really well thought out but they also feel kinda artificial, like these people have been sitting on their thoughts for weeks just waiting to preach, and this site lets them create an anonymous straw-man to ask the odd, if not unusually dumb, question so they can spill out their weird constipated shit on the internet.
​
/rj
​
I wish my CTO would change us over to Scala. He likes to complain about compilation time and mentions something about each file needing 5 passes... Does he not understand the complexity of the language? The compiler just needs to take some time to appreciate and understand the beauty of the language.<|eor|><|sor|>>Does he not understand the complexity of the language? The compiler just needs to take some time to appreciate and understand the beauty of the language.
Excellent,10/10.
Moving to pcjcopypasta.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | ninjaaron | egpvhir | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>Of course, there's a Richard Kenneth Eng answer completely dismissing the question and promoting Smalltalk.<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah, what's the deal with that? Has he taken it as his sole job to bring back Smalltalk?<|eor|><|sor|>>Yeah, what's the deal with that? Has he taken it as his sole job to bring back Smalltalk?
/UNJERK
He's really annoying. I got into a small flame war with him because he was pooh-poing Lisp ("the greatest single programming language ever invented" according to Smalltalk creator Alan Kay), until by his own confession he admitted not knowing Lisp at all.
<|eor|><|sor|>For a good time, tell him that Ruby is the modern version of Smalltalk.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | 28f272fe556a1363cc31 | ego1lut | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>I feel like an idiot when driving a tricycle because it is too simple and any driver can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex vehicle like Land Rover?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | savuporo | egpi6vc | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>> I am professional programmer and good experience with many programming languages,
> Without taking your enough time letme share some tips..
> 1st of all explore yourself the programming language you are going to choose is just a trend/hype or its really worth. GoLang is just a hype like few other langs created by some multinational brands just to addict developers and make more customers and convince them play within there limited product based features.
> Try to find your solution in the following langs
> C++, C, php, Java, JavaScript, phython
> Others almost all langs are brand specific like c#, swift, kotlin, .net, scala, golang etc
> Now if you are forced to choose between golang or scala then i will recommend go with scala, cause golang is not mature as scala..
> For more details you can contact me
> LinkedIn
"Senior Software Architect at Netflix"<|eor|><|sor|>> C++, C, php, Java, JavaScript, phython
This list not blessed by Larry Wall<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | MMPride | ego1fyw | <|sols|><|sot|>I feel like an idiot when programming in Golang because it is too simple and any developers can learn it easily, should I convince my CTO to change to a complex language like Scala? - Quora<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.quora.com/I-feel-like-an-idiot-when-programming-in-Golang-because-it-is-too-simple-and-any-developers-can-learn-it-easily-should-I-convince-my-CTO-to-change-to-a-complex-language-like-Scala<|eol|><|sor|>Wow, that's actually what the title is... lmao.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5 |
programmingcirclejerk | carbolymer | 98p34t | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 149 |
programmingcirclejerk | i9srpeg | e4i6e26 | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>The obvious solution is to get rid of Jabbascript and simply *transpile* Rust to wasm. There's a mathematical proof showing how bloat is impossible when using Rust's borrow checker.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 58 |
programmingcirclejerk | VikeStep | e4hxlls | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>To be fair, they aren't just some average blogger, it was written by an engineering manager at Google.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 50 |
programmingcirclejerk | frkbmr | e4hvgqj | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>How exciting! How exciting! <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 41 |
programmingcirclejerk | doomvox | e4i27xi | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>To be fair, they aren't just some average blogger, it was written by an engineering manager at Google.<|eor|><|sor|>He works at Google? How exciting!<|eor|><|sor|>Since google inflicted the javascript plaque on the world, it's only right that they make some effort to rein it in.
<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | i9srpeg | e4i6bf8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>To be fair, they aren't just some average blogger, it was written by an engineering manager at Google.<|eor|><|sor|>> it was written by an engineering manager at Google
That's why I'm busy blowing him instead of complaining. You need to be a God to be able to work at Google, it is known.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32 |
programmingcirclejerk | carbolymer | e4i738t | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>To be fair, they aren't just some average blogger, it was written by an engineering manager at Google.<|eor|><|sor|>He works at Google? How exciting!<|eor|><|sor|>Since google inflicted the javascript plaque on the world, it's only right that they make some effort to rein it in.
<|eor|><|soopr|>>plaque
Can we floss it?<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | dnkndnts | e4i7i25 | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>Comparative example: if you were wondering what CNN would be like without JS bloat and marketing bs, [watch and be amazed](https://lite.cnn.com/).<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | carbolymer | e4i77lc | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>The obvious solution is to get rid of Jabbascript and simply *transpile* Rust to wasm. There's a mathematical proof showing how bloat is impossible when using Rust's borrow checker.<|eor|><|soopr|>When doing wasm, the bloat is transferred to the developer via magic toolchain heavier than node_modules at Google. At the end the developer dies from excessive bloat.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | err_pell | e4i7zfi | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>`#include <cunjerk>`
Hey you should not let them know that you've read 3 articles this month or ever. That's your privacy right there. Take it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | AUTplayed | e4i2wl6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>dynamic import? you mean like...including imports on the pages they are used at??? Without packing everything up into a huge package and instead doing it like the old times???????<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | err_pell | e4i838r | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>Comparative example: if you were wondering what CNN would be like without JS bloat and marketing bs, [watch and be amazed](https://lite.cnn.com/).<|eor|><|sor|>`import unjerk`
Wow I'd read that. I had this idea to make a service where you can pick a website and block some elements in it (like adblock does) and you'd share the blocked elements as a configuration file or whatever to make it easier for other people to see website without bloat. But I'm no weeb dev and I have a short attention span.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | DJ-Salinger | e4igssp | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>>tl;dr: less code = less parse/compile + less transfer + less to decompress
Jesus Christ<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | err_pell | e4i7sxg | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>To be fair, they aren't just some average blogger, it was written by an engineering manager at Google.<|eor|><|sor|>He works at Google? How exciting!<|eor|><|sor|>Since google inflicted the javascript plaque on the world, it's only right that they make some effort to rein it in.
<|eor|><|soopr|>>plaque
Can we floss it?<|eoopr|><|sor|>GNO/JS or as I like to call it GNU minus JS.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | carbolymer | e4i74rf | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>Water is wet<|eor|><|soopr|>Haskal is superior<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | carbolymer | e4i71ew | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>To be fair, they aren't just some average blogger, it was written by an engineering manager at Google.<|eor|><|soopr|>Then it's 10x astonishment<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | three18ti | e4iyhhk | <|sols|><|sot|>Astonished blogger finds that sending huge amounts of JavaScript code instead of HTML causes slow, useless web pages<|eot|><|sol|>https://medium.com/dev-channel/the-cost-of-javascript-84009f51e99e<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>[Make Medium Readable Again](https://makemediumreadable.com/)<|eor|><|sor|>Yea, but you're _still_ reading medium articles...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | cmov | 8arrht | <|sols|><|sot|>Data Structures and Algorithms in Go: The library is not intended for direct use by importing. We strongly recommend copying the necessary implementations and adjusting to your case. Don't forget about proverb: A little copying is better than a little dependency.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/floyernick/Data-Structures-and-Algorithms#usage<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 147 |
programmingcirclejerk | FascinatedBox | dx129z8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Data Structures and Algorithms in Go: The library is not intended for direct use by importing. We strongly recommend copying the necessary implementations and adjusting to your case. Don't forget about proverb: A little copying is better than a little dependency.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/floyernick/Data-Structures-and-Algorithms#usage<|eol|><|sor|>Weird how some of the Go devs can not only talk themselves into doing a computer's work for it, but convince themselves it's a positive.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 103 |
programmingcirclejerk | samnardoni | dx0zh8n | <|sols|><|sot|>Data Structures and Algorithms in Go: The library is not intended for direct use by importing. We strongly recommend copying the necessary implementations and adjusting to your case. Don't forget about proverb: A little copying is better than a little dependency.<|eot|><|sol|>https://github.com/floyernick/Data-Structures-and-Algorithms#usage<|eol|><|sor|>Ive got a better proverb: a little dependency is better than a little copying.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 81 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.