subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmingcirclejerk | vivainio | dd0jai6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Data Rockstar<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/zQLNKwt.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>QA Inquisitors<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | wolf2600 | dd0my24 | <|sols|><|sot|>Data Rockstar<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/zQLNKwt.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>[business intelligence explained](https://imgur.com/gallery/qxsCO)<|eor|><|sor|>[You need a dashboard](http://www.ociusdigital.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/dilbert.png)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 14 |
programmingcirclejerk | Graftak9000 | dd0ij3a | <|sols|><|sot|>Data Rockstar<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/zQLNKwt.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Now the Seven Nations Army guitar solo is playing in my head with the word data. Good times. <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | wolf2600 | dd0mv5m | <|sols|><|sot|>Data Rockstar<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/zQLNKwt.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Sharepoint NINJA!!!
Dashboards for ALL the metrics!
BI like WHOA!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | BromeyerofSolairina | dd298x1 | <|sols|><|sot|>Data Rockstar<|eot|><|sol|>http://i.imgur.com/zQLNKwt.jpg<|eol|><|sor|><unjerk>
Okay this is the shit that really pisses me off. These are the people that make my life hell. These are the individuals who tell my boss how cool it would be to see a bubble chart by "metric we don't track x" by "metric we don't track y". These are the individuals who should not be allowed near a database due to how totally shit their understanding of cardinality is. These are the the idiots who report 3x earnings because they don't know how to do a join, but they watched a 2 minute "how to make a line chart in PowerBI" YouTube video. Fuck me. Fuck this. Fuck your motherfucking life.
</unjerk><|eor|><|sor|>Am I missing something or is cardinality just the number of unique entries in a table?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProgVal | 10v93hj | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 145 |
programmingcirclejerk | aikii | j7g5hnb | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>I mean behind all this it's the very same Bill Gates that injected the entire human race with a 5G microchip vaccine<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 104 |
programmingcirclejerk | Handsomefoxhf | j7gjdyh | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>> Yes, I can't wrap my head around the fact that VS Code and Teams came out of the same company.
Actually true, I can see somebody taking a huge shit and dropping VS Code once, but to repeat this success with Teams is truly an achievement.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 62 |
programmingcirclejerk | jwezorek | j7gsl49 | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>>What do people not like about Teams?
lol<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 52 |
programmingcirclejerk | ItsAllAboutTheL1Bro | j7g6hgu | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>Improving gimped languages is bad.
>Sure, but I would still feel angry towards people who work for unethical companies even though they "just" work in the accounting department.
Welcome to the real world<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | Testiclese | j7gxfrt | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>I mean behind all this it's the very same Bill Gates that injected the entire human race with a 5G microchip vaccine<|eor|><|sor|>Im super pissed off Im stuck at 3G! Illuminati directive streaming into my brain is all buffered and pixelated, ugh.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | MrCreeper1008 | j7gomj4 | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>brb installing typeblocker in vscode<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 31 |
programmingcirclejerk | McGlockenshire | j7gilyd | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>Improving gimped languages is bad.
>Sure, but I would still feel angry towards people who work for unethical companies even though they "just" work in the accounting department.
Welcome to the real world<|eor|><|sor|>Wait for him to hear about weapon companies<|eor|><|sor|>Wait until he hears about a Darpa project that was handed over to a bunch of LSD addicts.<|eor|><|sor|>Do you have the slightest idea how little that narrows it down?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 31 |
programmingcirclejerk | iro84657 | j7gc3x2 | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>Improving gimped languages is bad.
>Sure, but I would still feel angry towards people who work for unethical companies even though they "just" work in the accounting department.
Welcome to the real world<|eor|><|sor|>> Improving gimped languages is bad.
Of course, everyone knows that GIMP is dead and every 10x designer uses photopea\.com these days<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | IanisVasilev | j7jimsq | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>>What do people not like about Teams?
lol<|eor|><|sor|>Microsoft Teams is about as dysfunctional as the average team.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | leaningtoweravenger | j7g9tac | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>Improving gimped languages is bad.
>Sure, but I would still feel angry towards people who work for unethical companies even though they "just" work in the accounting department.
Welcome to the real world<|eor|><|sor|>Wait for him to hear about weapon companies<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | VTWAX_ONLY_INVESTOR | j7hbwrq | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>Dart FTW!<|eor|><|sor|>lmao it has like 3 users<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | VanDieDorp | j7hl373 | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>its funny because gmail and all the google apps will most probably a lot worse, if the smart ass cs mathematicians google hired did not re-invent the jdk using js, with a jsdoc type system optimiser and compiler, stdlib and template system.
Only to be rejected by the js community late 2009 when Google Closure got open sourced.
How we humans like to repeat history...
At least it will supply my with a steady income, until all this cs abstractions drives me mad ;)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | aikii | j7ge8kr | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>Improving gimped languages is bad.
>Sure, but I would still feel angry towards people who work for unethical companies even though they "just" work in the accounting department.
Welcome to the real world<|eor|><|sor|>Wait for him to hear about weapon companies<|eor|><|sor|>Wait until he hears about a Darpa project that was handed over to a bunch of LSD addicts.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | NiteShdw | j7hcavl | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>Dart FTW!<|eor|><|sor|>lmao it has like 3 users<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah and its way more successful than just adding types over existing JS, right? <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | NiteShdw | j7gtp1w | <|sols|><|sot|>That the same people who thought "it's a good idea to use CS theory to add a type system to Javascript" are the same people who thought "it's a good idea to put ads in the start menu".<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34677525<|eol|><|sor|>Dart FTW!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | univalence | wgo15e | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 146 |
programmingcirclejerk | stone_henge | ij13yzp | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>Heroin has been ranked as the most liked drug by its users for several decades in a row<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 154 |
programmingcirclejerk | LeeHide | ij1a5wf | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj love people who are so deep in their tech-news bubble that they think Carbon is a huge deal and a possible replacement for C++<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 149 |
programmingcirclejerk | SickMoonDoe | ij1297g | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>Yes, and I'm tired of pretending it was anything more all of these years.
You absolute fucking dolts wrote a whole ass language to avoid learning how pointers work - and you deserve to be sent to a re-education facility for no less than 4-8 years.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 101 |
programmingcirclejerk | irqlnotdispatchlevel | ij17afd | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>> Another issue are the constant warnings appearing over parentheses, especially over if statements and while loops.<|eor|><|sor|>I think this is what we could call an unenthusiastic youngster.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 82 |
programmingcirclejerk | jannyobliterator69 | ij20nny | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj love people who are so deep in their tech-news bubble that they think Carbon is a huge deal and a possible replacement for C++<|eor|><|sor|>/uj on the one hand Carbon is made by Google and will probably be canceled in 3.4 picoseconds, on the other hand it's made by Google and they have a vested interest in making something that can interoperate with half a billion lines of existing C++ code they have
they've seemingly moved a lot of the effort/people they had been putting into Clang to this project. I'm inclined to think it's got a chance at going somewhere when the editor of the C++ standard decided to become a lead for it, for example<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 78 |
programmingcirclejerk | PL_Design | ij28ive | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj love people who are so deep in their tech-news bubble that they think Carbon is a huge deal and a possible replacement for C++<|eor|><|sor|>/uj on the one hand Carbon is made by Google and will probably be canceled in 3.4 picoseconds, on the other hand it's made by Google and they have a vested interest in making something that can interoperate with half a billion lines of existing C++ code they have
they've seemingly moved a lot of the effort/people they had been putting into Clang to this project. I'm inclined to think it's got a chance at going somewhere when the editor of the C++ standard decided to become a lead for it, for example<|eor|><|sor|>You make compelling arguments. That's how we know it will get cancelled.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 78 |
programmingcirclejerk | LeeHide | ij1acs7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
> Its syntax is similar to that of C++
lets remove this post, its clearly either fabricated jerk or some kid :/<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 67 |
programmingcirclejerk | irqlnotdispatchlevel | ij17e7j | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|soopr|>In which a high-quality e-zine which definitely hasn't ripped off the npm logo lays out strong arguments against rust such as
> It has a complex syntax and a steep learning curve
and
> While it does save developers from some mistakes, it does not stop them from unintentionally writing bugs<|eoopr|><|sor|>> While it does save developers from some mistakes, it does not stop them from unintentionally writing bugs.
As opposed to languages like C and JavaScript in which it is illegal to write bugs. Write once, support forever.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 67 |
programmingcirclejerk | univalence | ij0tnkx | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|soopr|>In which a high-quality e-zine which definitely hasn't ripped off the npm logo lays out strong arguments against rust such as
> It has a complex syntax and a steep learning curve
and
> While it does save developers from some mistakes, it does not stop them from unintentionally writing bugs<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 60 |
programmingcirclejerk | Kotauskas | ij0ycw3 | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>This cool popular language has existed for 7 whole years now, and yet it doesn't have every single feature from Ada SPARK that have been driven to perfection and battle-tested in decades of tireless work. How come?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 56 |
programmingcirclejerk | LeeHide | ij1a834 | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>> why Rust didnt become the official successor
give it time! the year of the Rust desktop will come!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 49 |
programmingcirclejerk | Evinceo | ij1ap4p | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj love people who are so deep in their tech-news bubble that they think Carbon is a huge deal and a possible replacement for C++<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah, Calcium is where it's at.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 48 |
programmingcirclejerk | AprilSpektra | ij1px3c | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
> Its syntax is similar to that of C++
lets remove this post, its clearly either fabricated jerk or some kid :/<|eor|><|sor|>I mean it has curly braces, what more proof do you need?"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 41 |
programmingcirclejerk | RAKtheUndead | ij13l3m | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>This cool popular language has existed for 7 whole years now, and yet it doesn't have every single feature from Ada SPARK that have been driven to perfection and battle-tested in decades of tireless work. How come?<|eor|><|sor|>Too many webshits, not enough steely-eyed missile men.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | _babu_ | ij2dooj | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj love people who are so deep in their tech-news bubble that they think Carbon is a huge deal and a possible replacement for C++<|eor|><|sor|>/uj on the one hand Carbon is made by Google and will probably be canceled in 3.4 picoseconds, on the other hand it's made by Google and they have a vested interest in making something that can interoperate with half a billion lines of existing C++ code they have
they've seemingly moved a lot of the effort/people they had been putting into Clang to this project. I'm inclined to think it's got a chance at going somewhere when the editor of the C++ standard decided to become a lead for it, for example<|eor|><|sor|>/uj Reasons why it will it will fail:
- Only supports clang, and by the looks of it it will stay like that forever.
- Typescript style syntax, orthogonal to C++ declarations, insert *muh parsing c++ hurd*.
- Shitty build tool instead of just using cmake like the rest of us peasants, cause we gotta be edgy and shit.
- No ABI stability, fuck linux I guess.
- Google
/rj Refer to text above<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | serg06 | ij2gvtj | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>Heroin has been ranked as the most liked drug by its users for several decades in a row<|eor|><|sor|>\- The Rust book, chapter 7, proverb 3.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32 |
programmingcirclejerk | SlimesWithBowties | ij19zmb | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>/uj shitty clickbait considering more than half of the article is taking the opposite stance of it's title<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | closer_now | ij1bx5r | <|sols|><|sot|>Should we call Rust a failed programming language?<|eot|><|sol|>https://analyticsindiamag.com/should-we-call-rust-a-failed-programming-language/<|eol|><|sor|>> Another issue are the constant warnings appearing over parentheses, especially over if statements and while loops.<|eor|><|sor|>I think this is what we could call an unenthusiastic youngster.<|eor|><|sor|>Based youngster<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 29 |
programmingcirclejerk | Sh4dowCode | vobje9 | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 142 |
programmingcirclejerk | therico | iebybqq | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 127 |
programmingcirclejerk | UnShame | iec5uur | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>> I say this as a senior dev with 8+ years of experience ... I've learned to navigate its waters over the years, fully appreciate the difference between git and GitHub, etc etc
Similarly, it took my grandma about the same time to fully appreciate the difference between Google the website and Google Chrome the browser.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 110 |
programmingcirclejerk | Bizzaro_Murphy | iecpv37 | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>[Obligatory git koans](https://stevelosh.com/blog/2013/04/git-koans/)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 100 |
programmingcirclejerk | Bizzaro_Murphy | iecpbtb | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>Our lord and saviour Linus knew that the only way to keep bad software developers away was to give git the most incomprehensible backward ass interface that has ever been conceived.
He knew that the long held software tradition of not needing to understand an implementation to use an interface was blasphemy spewed by false prophets and designed git accordingly - by requiring users to understand git inside-out before being able to use it.
We should all be thankful for him. We are surely blessed.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 66 |
programmingcirclejerk | witcher_rat | iecwqg5 | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk<|eor|><|sor|>I too take unwarranted pride in my ability to bear with shitty tools<|eor|><|sor|>No you're right, git is too hard, we should refuse to come into work until the company switches to mercurial.<|eor|><|sor|>I don't get how people think that git is hard. As long as they aren't running random commands from SO, it works great. Commit, reset, merge, checkout are all the commands one needs to be effective.<|eor|><|sor|>> Commit, reset, merge, checkout are all the commands one needs to be effective.
I agree. So long as you never git pull, push, or clone, you'll never have issues.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 59 |
programmingcirclejerk | therico | iecctq5 | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk<|eor|><|sor|>I too take unwarranted pride in my ability to bear with shitty tools<|eor|><|sor|>No you're right, git is too hard, we should refuse to come into work until the company switches to mercurial.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 42 |
programmingcirclejerk | RepresentativeNo6029 | iec5kg9 | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk<|eor|><|sor|>I too take unwarranted pride in my ability to bear with shitty tools<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | Apprehensive-Yak311 | iedogps | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>[Obligatory git koans](https://stevelosh.com/blog/2013/04/git-koans/)<|eor|><|sor|>/uj I usually hate weird programmer poems, but fuck me this one got me good. Funniest thing Ive read in a long time.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 39 |
programmingcirclejerk | lampshadish2 | ied61fe | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>I hate it when people list Git as a skill. If a developer adds it to their resume I always ask them as a first task to implement Git on a whiteboard. Being able to use Git does not make you a git professional. It's like saying you are a bus driver and then only meaning is a passenger. If you don't know the algorithms that make Git you aren't a Git professional.<|eor|><|sor|>/uj This is a jerk right? Right?!?
/rj Same with Postgres too though, for real.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 38 |
programmingcirclejerk | onthefence928 | ieegt51 | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>[Obligatory git koans](https://stevelosh.com/blog/2013/04/git-koans/)<|eor|><|sor|>I am enlightened<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | pareidolist | ief2rwn | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>I hate it when people list Git as a skill. If a developer adds it to their resume I always ask them as a first task to implement Git on a whiteboard. Being able to use Git does not make you a git professional. It's like saying you are a bus driver and then only meaning is a passenger. If you don't know the algorithms that make Git you aren't a Git professional.<|eor|><|sor|>I hate it when people list programming languages as a skill. If a developer adds a programming language to their resume I always ask them as a first task to implement it on a whiteboard.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | onthefence928 | ieeh2ll | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>Our lord and saviour Linus knew that the only way to keep bad software developers away was to give git the most incomprehensible backward ass interface that has ever been conceived.
He knew that the long held software tradition of not needing to understand an implementation to use an interface was blasphemy spewed by false prophets and designed git accordingly - by requiring users to understand git inside-out before being able to use it.
We should all be thankful for him. We are surely blessed.<|eor|><|sor|>Truly. And it was entertaining watching the entire software industry grind to a halt for months, as everyone universally pretended that only those *other* guys ever had any trouble with git.<|eor|><|sor|>I dont have trouble with git I just stick to the 6 commands I trust and if anything weird happens I just create another branch in another directory, copy the directory and start fresh from where I left off.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | recycle4science | iedd0ab | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>> I say this as a senior dev with 8+ years of experience ... I've learned to navigate its waters over the years, fully appreciate the difference between git and GitHub, etc etc
Similarly, it took my grandma about the same time to fully appreciate the difference between Google the website and Google Chrome the browser.<|eor|><|sor|>Eight whole years of experience!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | Kodiologist | iedlot9 | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk<|eor|><|sor|>You can't even appreciate the nerdification of "that's a sign they're dense and I should avoid them" as "that's an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them"?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | doomvox | iedyf7l | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>My first job out of college I was working with this group of consultants from India. In hindsight, they were pretty bad engineers. But they were so particular about how our commit history should be that I became a master in git.
Now I can blow anybodys mind with an explanation of how a rebase works, and how I can split up one pr into several in like 5 mins<|eor|><|sor|>How do you do it?<|eor|><|sor|>You draw an analogy between rebasing and the Russian Revolution, the Spanish-American War and Orwell, quote Bertrand Russell and Thomas Kuhn a lot, and if all else fails bang them over the head with your keyboard.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | witcher_rat | iecyws3 | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk<|eor|><|sor|>I too take unwarranted pride in my ability to bear with shitty tools<|eor|><|sor|>No you're right, git is too hard, we should refuse to come into work until the company switches to mercurial.<|eor|><|sor|>I don't get how people think that git is hard. As long as they aren't running random commands from SO, it works great. Commit, reset, merge, checkout are all the commands one needs to be effective.<|eor|><|sor|>> Commit, reset, merge, checkout are all the commands one needs to be effective.
I agree. So long as you never git pull, push, or clone, you'll never have issues.<|eor|><|sor|>Ok ok, I forgot a few that are in shell aliases due me. But, those 3 are trivial. I mentioned the ones people tend to be skeerrd of<|eor|><|sor|>/uj I was sorta joking because this _is_ the pcj sub... but also half not-joking because the real difficulties only show up when you're dealing with a non-trivial repo other people are also working on, and you have to deal with merge-conflicts, rebasing, cherry-picking, submodules, branches-of-branches, etc.
(not that I personally have problems with them, just noting that one needs to know quite a bit about git when using it in the workplace)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | MalnarThe | iecugnc | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk<|eor|><|sor|>I too take unwarranted pride in my ability to bear with shitty tools<|eor|><|sor|>No you're right, git is too hard, we should refuse to come into work until the company switches to mercurial.<|eor|><|sor|>I don't get how people think that git is hard. As long as they aren't running random commands from SO, it works great. Commit, reset, merge, checkout are all the commands one needs to be effective.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | muntaxitome | ied0u0v | <|sols|><|sot|>If a software developer finds git too complex, thats an important signal that I should minimize my exposure to them.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31933934<|eol|><|sor|>I hate it when people list Git as a skill. If a developer adds it to their resume I always ask them as a first task to implement Git on a whiteboard. Being able to use Git does not make you a git professional. It's like saying you are a bus driver and then only meaning is a passenger. If you don't know the algorithms that make Git you aren't a Git professional.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | ____ben____ | t89h0f | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 144 |
programmingcirclejerk | LupeGirl | hzmxclk | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>I'm at the Bugatti Chiron-tier in terms of intellectual horsepower and I only write in C, so this commenter is correct.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 74 |
programmingcirclejerk | whereisspacebar | hzn21xy | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, theyre not researchers. Theyre typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C or C++, probably learned Python. Theyre not capable of understanding a brilliant language but we want to use them to build good software. So, the language that we give them has to be easy for them to understand and easy to adopt. It must be familiar, roughly C-like. Programmers working at Google are early in their careers and are most familiar with procedural languages, particularly from the C family. The need to get programmers productive quickly in a new language means that the language cannot be too radical.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 68 |
programmingcirclejerk | 10xelectronguru | hznlf6h | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>I came when reading [this](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30581038) from the same thread:
> Eh. The "right" people can have perverse incentives.
> My former mentor worked at a startup called Takt that billed itself as Haskell-only. It attracted all the top minds - Runar Bjarnason, who wrote a famous Scala book, worked there - and everyone was very eager to write Haskell code for a living.
> The engineering team quickly went all-in on functional everything. Nix for package managers, a Haskell-to-JS transpiler for writing frontend code, immutable databases, the works. Because they eschewed all the boring technology that had been proven reliable over the years and only played with the bleeding edge in Haskell, they quickly ran into limitations of the ecosystem: performance degradations as they hit corner cases, missing functionality that needed to be patched upstream, corner cases that no tooling had existed to support it, etc. Before long, they were single-handedly supporting the broader Haskell ecosystem rather than spending cycles delivering on the business contracts they had.
> This was all very fine with engineering - why not contribute upstream? Why not drive Haskell to broader adoption, which was in line with the company's values? - but management balked. They began to raise the possibility of maybe ditching their bespoke tooling and moving to something more standard. This didn't go down well - it caused a schism, where half the engineering team felt the right way forward was to double-down on the existing nascent Haskell technology and offer more support and training, and the others who just wanted to get stuff done.
> Anyway, the startup failed. Turns out, when you hire for people who really believe in a programming language, you can occasionally attract zealots.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 54 |
programmingcirclejerk | aldantanneo | hzn1sss | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>Wheres the jerk<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 53 |
programmingcirclejerk | burly_griffin | hzngdfw | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, theyre not researchers. Theyre typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C or C++, probably learned Python. Theyre not capable of understanding a brilliant language but we want to use them to build good software. So, the language that we give them has to be easy for them to understand and easy to adopt.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 49 |
programmingcirclejerk | Dissentient | hznazo6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>"intellectual horsepower" sounds like a flair<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45 |
programmingcirclejerk | ackfoobar | hzof1r7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Serious, is in fact, UJ/Serious, or as I've recently taken to calling it, unjerk plus serious.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 31 |
programmingcirclejerk | pareidolist | hznqvj7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>I'm at the Bugatti Chiron-tier in terms of intellectual horsepower and I only write in C, so this commenter is correct.<|eor|><|sor|>lol no jet-propelled dragster<|eor|><|sor|>The Bugatti Chiron Has No Jet-Propelled DragsterAnd That's a Good Thing<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | james_pic | hzor6wn | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>I came when reading [this](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30581038) from the same thread:
> Eh. The "right" people can have perverse incentives.
> My former mentor worked at a startup called Takt that billed itself as Haskell-only. It attracted all the top minds - Runar Bjarnason, who wrote a famous Scala book, worked there - and everyone was very eager to write Haskell code for a living.
> The engineering team quickly went all-in on functional everything. Nix for package managers, a Haskell-to-JS transpiler for writing frontend code, immutable databases, the works. Because they eschewed all the boring technology that had been proven reliable over the years and only played with the bleeding edge in Haskell, they quickly ran into limitations of the ecosystem: performance degradations as they hit corner cases, missing functionality that needed to be patched upstream, corner cases that no tooling had existed to support it, etc. Before long, they were single-handedly supporting the broader Haskell ecosystem rather than spending cycles delivering on the business contracts they had.
> This was all very fine with engineering - why not contribute upstream? Why not drive Haskell to broader adoption, which was in line with the company's values? - but management balked. They began to raise the possibility of maybe ditching their bespoke tooling and moving to something more standard. This didn't go down well - it caused a schism, where half the engineering team felt the right way forward was to double-down on the existing nascent Haskell technology and offer more support and training, and the others who just wanted to get stuff done.
> Anyway, the startup failed. Turns out, when you hire for people who really believe in a programming language, you can occasionally attract zealots.<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>A startup only fails if FAANG fail to buy it.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | corona-info | hznij8t | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>> Why would anyone choose Haskell to develop applications? Does it offer any actual practical benefits over other languages?
lel wagie in over his head<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | pastenpasten | hzo22ij | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, theyre not researchers. Theyre typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C or C++, probably learned Python. Theyre not capable of understanding a brilliant language but we want to use them to build good software. So, the language that we give them has to be easy for them to understand and easy to adopt. It must be familiar, roughly C-like. Programmers working at Google are early in their careers and are most familiar with procedural languages, particularly from the C family. The need to get programmers productive quickly in a new language means that the language cannot be too radical.<|eor|><|sor|>> Go doesnt attract mediocrity it attracts pragmatism.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | defunkydrummer | hzpbilh | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>I came when reading [this](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30581038) from the same thread:
> Eh. The "right" people can have perverse incentives.
> My former mentor worked at a startup called Takt that billed itself as Haskell-only. It attracted all the top minds - Runar Bjarnason, who wrote a famous Scala book, worked there - and everyone was very eager to write Haskell code for a living.
> The engineering team quickly went all-in on functional everything. Nix for package managers, a Haskell-to-JS transpiler for writing frontend code, immutable databases, the works. Because they eschewed all the boring technology that had been proven reliable over the years and only played with the bleeding edge in Haskell, they quickly ran into limitations of the ecosystem: performance degradations as they hit corner cases, missing functionality that needed to be patched upstream, corner cases that no tooling had existed to support it, etc. Before long, they were single-handedly supporting the broader Haskell ecosystem rather than spending cycles delivering on the business contracts they had.
> This was all very fine with engineering - why not contribute upstream? Why not drive Haskell to broader adoption, which was in line with the company's values? - but management balked. They began to raise the possibility of maybe ditching their bespoke tooling and moving to something more standard. This didn't go down well - it caused a schism, where half the engineering team felt the right way forward was to double-down on the existing nascent Haskell technology and offer more support and training, and the others who just wanted to get stuff done.
> Anyway, the startup failed. Turns out, when you hire for people who really believe in a programming language, you can occasionally attract zealots.<|eor|><|sor|>>but management balked
/uj culprit found, case closed<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | kmoskos | hzovdjz | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>Wheres the jerk<|eor|><|sor|>/uj the jerk is in the tone. Nobody can dispute that go is a dumbed down language.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | hzq9rs7 | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>We're talking about intellectual horsepower but what about intellectual torque?
Sure, you can get up fast and going, but how fast can you go? How much can you handle?
Would you rather be the intellectual equivalent of a speedy race car that can easily and violently crash and burn, or a reliable hunky truck that can pull big loads.
Lisp let's us be intellectual trucks.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | irqlnotdispatchlevel | hzodwkp | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>How can one attract mediocrity in a good way? Asking for a friend.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | scatters | hzoj2ws | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>How can one attract mediocrity in a good way? Asking for a friend.<|eor|><|sor|>They're just not into you. Sorry.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | doomvox | hznjfet | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>Wheres the jerk<|eor|><|sor|>Always close at hand.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | Shorttail0 | hzp3s0z | <|sols|><|sot|>Go attracts mediocrity and not in a good way, it also actively repels the "right " people if you want to hire for highest intellectual horsepower for a given budget.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30578257<|eol|><|sor|>The key point here is our programmers are Googlers, theyre not researchers. Theyre typically, fairly young, fresh out of school, probably learned Java, maybe learned C or C++, probably learned Python. Theyre not capable of understanding a brilliant language but we want to use them to build good software. So, the language that we give them has to be easy for them to understand and easy to adopt. It must be familiar, roughly C-like. Programmers working at Google are early in their careers and are most familiar with procedural languages, particularly from the C family. The need to get programmers productive quickly in a new language means that the language cannot be too radical.<|eor|><|sor|>> Go doesnt attract mediocrity it attracts pragmatism.<|eor|><|sor|>When people tell you you're pragmatic, but they really mean mediocre<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | Volt | qpxatq | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 144 |
programmingcirclejerk | closer_now | hjwnz2i | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|sor|>liquor store near me open<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 100 |
programmingcirclejerk | PL_Design | hjwwthn | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|sor|>I downdiggled his entire NFT collection, uploaded them to a bottom text generator website, and sent the unfunny maymays to everyone in my contacts. No one will ever stop me.
That's why she calls my name during sex and not his.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 84 |
programmingcirclejerk | roguas | hjx65jc | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|sor|>now i aint sayin she a gold digga, but she messin with abnormally active blockchain addresses<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 47 |
programmingcirclejerk | pareidolist | hjy74ne | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|sor|>> NFTs are the new diamonds
This is true, as a scathing critique of the diamond industry<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | Clockwork757 | hjxt7wz | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|sor|>>She has a ring too, as for the NFTs... we're managing it together and will consider splitting it too. But we'll see how it goes
So he didn't actually propose with NFTs lmao<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 34 |
programmingcirclejerk | prf_q | hjwyg4c | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|sor|> and that girl thought this is somehow romantic?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32 |
programmingcirclejerk | drfuzzyness | hjyi2wy | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|sor|>Am I going to regret asking what in the world is a ""?<|eor|><|sor|>It's a code symbol for pyramid schemes.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | cmov | hjybtv9 | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|sor|>Am I going to regret asking what in the world is a ""?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | NiceTerm | hjx5egk | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|sor|>Worth my my<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 22 |
programmingcirclejerk | Bizzaro_Murphy | hjym9oo | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|sor|>Can someone explain to me how a picture is worth more just by virtue of how it's stored?<|eor|><|sor|>So storing the data of the image itself on the NFT blockchain wouldn't be scalable, so instead what you store is a URL link that hosts the image.
The reason why NFTs are so valuable, is because you can change what image is at that hosted URL at any time without anyone ever being able to validate it. You can swap your child's shitty drawing with one that is far more valuable without anyone knowing. This is where the value of NFTs is derived.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProgVal | hjz50yq | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|sor|>Hopefully this is the sake guy who decided to build a baby name generator app instead of choosing a name manually like a fucking emacs user<|eor|><|sor|>Hold on, that's an interesting concept. Baby names as NFTs, so no one can steal them.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 9 |
programmingcirclejerk | JimBoonie69 | hjyjuco | <|sols|><|sot|>I just proposed to my gf with my entire NFT Collection worth 12 on a billboard instead of diamonds.<|eot|><|sol|>https://twitter.com/shawnloong/status/1454827761302786052<|eol|><|sor|>Hopefully this is the sake guy who decided to build a baby name generator app instead of choosing a name manually like a fucking emacs user<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | cmov | pglv73 | <|sols|><|sot|>C++ isn't a childs toy. It's a tool for professionals. C++'s type system goes out of it's way to make using the language "safe" up to the point where you don't invoke undefined behavior.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/pbsp3t/haiku_os_dev_on_the_use_of_c_in_their_tree/hah5tvq/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 148 |
programmingcirclejerk | Flesh_Bike | hbc83eo | <|sols|><|sot|>C++ isn't a childs toy. It's a tool for professionals. C++'s type system goes out of it's way to make using the language "safe" up to the point where you don't invoke undefined behavior.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/pbsp3t/haiku_os_dev_on_the_use_of_c_in_their_tree/hah5tvq/<|eol|><|sor|>Lmao just don't move. Whats the problem?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 80 |
programmingcirclejerk | cmov | hbc4s5c | <|sols|><|sot|>C++ isn't a childs toy. It's a tool for professionals. C++'s type system goes out of it's way to make using the language "safe" up to the point where you don't invoke undefined behavior.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/pbsp3t/haiku_os_dev_on_the_use_of_c_in_their_tree/hah5tvq/<|eol|><|soopr|>> Use-after-move is a non-issue for me. It honestly never even occurred to me that someone might consider it to even be a concept until it was brought up in a previous discussion (Perhaps by you, but i don't recall) here on /r/cpp.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 49 |
programmingcirclejerk | earthisunderattack | hbcx4rz | <|sols|><|sot|>C++ isn't a childs toy. It's a tool for professionals. C++'s type system goes out of it's way to make using the language "safe" up to the point where you don't invoke undefined behavior.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/pbsp3t/haiku_os_dev_on_the_use_of_c_in_their_tree/hah5tvq/<|eol|><|soopr|>> Use-after-move is a non-issue for me. It honestly never even occurred to me that someone might consider it to even be a concept until it was brought up in a previous discussion (Perhaps by you, but i don't recall) here on /r/cpp.<|eoopr|><|sor|>using namespace unjerk;
There really is no reason that gcc/clang/msvc doesn't have use after free warning (and a ton others) an error by default.<|eor|><|sor|>/unjerk
* [gcc](https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DavidMalcolm/StaticAnalyze)
* [clang](https://clang-analyzer.llvm.org)
Some things worth mentioning:
* all static analyzers are either sound or unsound
* unsound: can produce false positives and false negatives
* sound: will not produce false negatives, can produce false positives
* neither gcc nor clang are complete. clang analyzes c++, but its documentation says nothing about soundness.
* gcc's still experimental. it doesn't support c++ yet. it still isn't necessarily sound.
Obviously, the more restrictive your language (or subset of that's being analyzed) is, the easier to produce a sound analysis.
The memory model imposed by Rust makes analyzing the code much easier (for both safe and unsafe)
Rust's analyzer is sound, at least according to
[this](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch19-01-unsafe-rust.html).
**TL;DR** it's really not that simple<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | fulstaph | hbcl1sh | <|sols|><|sot|>C++ isn't a childs toy. It's a tool for professionals. C++'s type system goes out of it's way to make using the language "safe" up to the point where you don't invoke undefined behavior.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/pbsp3t/haiku_os_dev_on_the_use_of_c_in_their_tree/hah5tvq/<|eol|><|sor|>just dont invoke undefined behaviour LOLW 4HEAD<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | GOPHERS_GONE_WILD | hbcpssf | <|sols|><|sot|>C++ isn't a childs toy. It's a tool for professionals. C++'s type system goes out of it's way to make using the language "safe" up to the point where you don't invoke undefined behavior.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/pbsp3t/haiku_os_dev_on_the_use_of_c_in_their_tree/hah5tvq/<|eol|><|sor|>Imagine writing that big of a post, and not only being wrong, but also getting dumped on by reddit midwits.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | freak_dessert2 | hbcosn8 | <|sols|><|sot|>C++ isn't a childs toy. It's a tool for professionals. C++'s type system goes out of it's way to make using the language "safe" up to the point where you don't invoke undefined behavior.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/pbsp3t/haiku_os_dev_on_the_use_of_c_in_their_tree/hah5tvq/<|eol|><|soopr|>> Use-after-move is a non-issue for me. It honestly never even occurred to me that someone might consider it to even be a concept until it was brought up in a previous discussion (Perhaps by you, but i don't recall) here on /r/cpp.<|eoopr|><|sor|>You don't even have to have those conversations if you just switched to rust <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | cmov | hbd6kvw | <|sols|><|sot|>C++ isn't a childs toy. It's a tool for professionals. C++'s type system goes out of it's way to make using the language "safe" up to the point where you don't invoke undefined behavior.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/pbsp3t/haiku_os_dev_on_the_use_of_c_in_their_tree/hah5tvq/<|eol|><|soopr|>> Use-after-move is a non-issue for me. It honestly never even occurred to me that someone might consider it to even be a concept until it was brought up in a previous discussion (Perhaps by you, but i don't recall) here on /r/cpp.<|eoopr|><|sor|>using namespace unjerk;
There really is no reason that gcc/clang/msvc doesn't have use after free warning (and a ton others) an error by default.<|eor|><|sor|>/unjerk
* [gcc](https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DavidMalcolm/StaticAnalyze)
* [clang](https://clang-analyzer.llvm.org)
Some things worth mentioning:
* all static analyzers are either sound or unsound
* unsound: can produce false positives and false negatives
* sound: will not produce false negatives, can produce false positives
* neither gcc nor clang are complete. clang analyzes c++, but its documentation says nothing about soundness.
* gcc's still experimental. it doesn't support c++ yet. it still isn't necessarily sound.
Obviously, the more restrictive your language (or subset of that's being analyzed) is, the easier to produce a sound analysis.
The memory model imposed by Rust makes analyzing the code much easier (for both safe and unsafe)
Rust's analyzer is sound, at least according to
[this](https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch19-01-unsafe-rust.html).
**TL;DR** it's really not that simple<|eor|><|sor|>[removed]<|eor|><|soopr|>[How about https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/I-unsound? I think everyone saying Rust is "high quality" or whatever is delusional until there are zero bugs on their GitHub.](https://old.reddit.com/r/programmingcirclejerk/comments/pegl5v/how_about/)<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | hbd3eku | <|sols|><|sot|>C++ isn't a childs toy. It's a tool for professionals. C++'s type system goes out of it's way to make using the language "safe" up to the point where you don't invoke undefined behavior.<|eot|><|sol|>https://old.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/pbsp3t/haiku_os_dev_on_the_use_of_c_in_their_tree/hah5tvq/<|eol|><|sor|>If you're worried about when and where move semantics are being used, why not just make every copy ever a move?
In fact, everything all the way down should just be [`mov`](https://github.com/xoreaxeaxeax/movfuscator).<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.