subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmingcirclejerk | YourGamerMom | gzfgu58 | <|sols|><|sot|>Fig is re-imagining the terminal.<|eot|><|sol|>https://fig.io<|eol|><|soopr|>> Investors: We've raised several million dollars from amazing VCs like General Catalyst and Kleiner Perkins, and angels like Jason Warner, Adam Gross, Olivier Pomel, Scott Belsky, Will Gaybrick and a handful of other impressive dev tool founders and executives.
Who wouldn't want to invest millions of dollars into terminal autocompletion<|eoopr|><|sor|>This is basically a license to print money! Just think of all the money people pay every day for terminal emulators, it's gotta be a tremendous market.<|eor|><|sor|>Looks like they've just scammed a bunch of investors to pay them to make a devtool. I geniuenly have no issues with that.<|eor|><|sor|>\\uj I support this if it's goal is to grift some VC money so make a side-project<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | gzh7nnr | <|sols|><|sot|>Fig is re-imagining the terminal.<|eot|><|sol|>https://fig.io<|eol|><|sor|>/uj
that looks like it will break and lag with any kind of substantial directory structure, or any command they didnt bother implementing support for.
Seriously, zsh + oh-my-zsh is easy to install, and does beautiful autocomplete.
If you need it really easy and simple, fish is a good choice.
This looks like bloat.
Edit: Haha thats great, they note "<50ms" as fast response speed. Thats actually horrible.
Of course its written in the fastest and least bug-prone of native languages, javascript (?!)<|eor|><|sor|>\>complaining about bloat
\>suggesting oh-my-zsh<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
Years ago I was using oh-my-zsh and wondered why it was so dog slow. Switched to fish and oh-my-fish and haven't looked back.<|eor|><|sor|>I don't even use oh-my-fish. I'm so tired of Frameworks for everything. Frameworks for my shell. Frameworks for my editor.
How about a Framework for Deez Nuts
/uj
I don't even use oh-my-fish. I'm getting tired of Frameworks for everything.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | BarefootUnicorn | md2ph9 | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 136 |
programmingcirclejerk | CptJero | gs81f37 | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>[imagine having a transactional database built into the browser and not using it](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/IndexedDB_API/Using_IndexedDB)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 92 |
programmingcirclejerk | GOPHERS_GONE_WILD | gs7z8ri | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>> 1.2 Mb
The web is doomed, apparently not even webass can save it, am actually disappointed.<|eor|><|sor|>Just load your whole fucking dotnet enterprise shit VM on every web page, what can go wrong?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 55 |
programmingcirclejerk | digital88 | gs778ls | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>Its giant steaming pile of gems then<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 48 |
programmingcirclejerk | zygohistomoronism | gs77gc2 | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>> 1.2 Mb
The web is doomed, apparently not even webass can save it, am actually disappointed.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 44 |
programmingcirclejerk | AsmCoder110 | gs9mtlz | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>[imagine having a transactional database built into the browser and not using it](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/IndexedDB_API/Using_IndexedDB)<|eor|><|sor|>Wow! This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 40 |
programmingcirclejerk | ws-ilazki | gs8u5jj | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>Its giant steaming pile of gems then<|eor|><|sor|>No, you find piles of gems in Ruby. JS libraries are steaming piles of webshit.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | jordanManfrey | gs80oyq | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>> 1.2 Mb
The web is doomed, apparently not even webass can save it, am actually disappointed.<|eor|><|sor|>Just load your whole fucking dotnet enterprise shit VM on every web page, what can go wrong?<|eor|><|sor|>brb rewriting everything in blazor<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 26 |
programmingcirclejerk | yyuyuyu2012 | gs8hi6h | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>[imagine having a transactional database built into the browser and not using it](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/IndexedDB_API/Using_IndexedDB)<|eor|><|sor|>Thank you I did not realize that was a thing.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | Grodesby | gs8imkk | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>It would fit on a 3.5" floppy!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | xigoi | gs9p0iq | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>It would fit on a 3.5" floppy!<|eor|><|sor|>a what now? is that some sort of framework<|eor|><|sor|>https://www.npmjs.com/package/floppy<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | LeeHide | gs9os10 | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>It would fit on a 3.5" floppy!<|eor|><|sor|>a what now? is that some sort of framework<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | LeeHide | gs9rewr | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>It would fit on a 3.5" floppy!<|eor|><|sor|>a what now? is that some sort of framework<|eor|><|sor|>https://www.npmjs.com/package/floppy<|eor|><|sor|>/uj nodejs devs discover RAII<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | tHeSiD | gsaa4o6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>[imagine having a transactional database built into the browser and not using it](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/IndexedDB_API/Using_IndexedDB)<|eor|><|sor|>Hi! Thank you for showing me this! but which JS library should I be using to access it?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5 |
programmingcirclejerk | RoughMedicine | gsa9t5n | <|sols|><|sot|>Wow! The sql.js bundle is only 8kb. This is a hidden gem for sure. Thanks for pointing it out! ... ... .. EDIT: It's actually 1.2MB. Thanks for pointing it out :)<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26582128<|eol|><|sor|>It would fit on a 3.5" floppy!<|eor|><|sor|>a what now? is that some sort of framework<|eor|><|sor|>https://www.npmjs.com/package/floppy<|eor|><|sor|>What does this do? I don't understand the problem this solves, and the README is anything but helpful.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 5 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | ll40tc | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 137 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | gnnewlj | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|soopr|>Making C excel-complete.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 111 |
programmingcirclejerk | Poddster | gnnf3ft | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|soopr|>Making C excel-complete.<|eoopr|><|sor|>Can't wait for C to gains `IFS()` so I can write my entire program in one long, thin, uneditable line.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 51 |
programmingcirclejerk | ws-ilazki | gnnthw6 | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|sor|>> You may wish to look at the Bourne shell source for other macros to make C readable.
[lol](https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V7/usr/src/cmd/sh/mac.h)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 45 |
programmingcirclejerk | sebamestre | gno0vcy | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|sor|>fearlessly declaring brutally pragmatic macros with no parentheses, just to weed out the 0.1xers that are confused why `TERN(condition, 5, 0) + 5` always equals 5. What a 10xer<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | likes_purple | gnnnkmq | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|sor|>[Elsewhere in the thread](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26153147):
> I've been designing a programming language where nothing is a side-effect including calling conventions, processor caches, branch predictors, locks, graphics modes, etc.. Runtime has to be independent of the value of the input would be how that language expresses "constant time" and it would take into account every part of the compiler's model of the target architecture (which, by the way, is also described in the code) so for a sufficiently-simple, sufficiently-well-modelled architecture, the generated code could be provably Spectre-proof given sufficient assumptions (Eis's take on Rust's `unsafe`).<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 30 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProgVal | gno55b8 | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|sor|>/uj Can't believe this is the part you chose to quote when there is also [this gem](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26150216) in the thread:
> Ifs are generally bad for readability though, because they force the reader to understand your control flow. Replacing an if with a ternary makes it more readable, not because the generated code is any different, but because a reader immediately knows that they don't need to scan through the two sides for control flow constructs (because the two sides of the ternary are guaranteed to be expressions rather than blocks). An if might occasionally be clearer than some convoluted algebra, but not often.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 25 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | gnnyqsk | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|sor|>> You may wish to look at the Bourne shell source for other macros to make C readable.
[lol](https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V7/usr/src/cmd/sh/mac.h)<|eor|><|soopr|>Based<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | ToughPhotograph | gnnlbtu | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|sor|>lol no if-expressions
lol statements<|eor|><|sor|>Ends up looking like s-expressions. This happens when Haskell programmers write C.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | archysailor | gnntmgd | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|soopr|>Making C excel-complete.<|eoopr|><|sor|>Can't wait for C to gains `IFS()` so I can write my entire program in one long, thin, uneditable line.<|eor|><|sor|>Preprocessor directive kinda ruin this paradigm (although you can get around this by manually declaring functions), but there is nothing stopping you right now from writing code in one long line.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | CallumCarmicheal | gnnrqjx | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|soopr|>Making C excel-complete.<|eoopr|><|sor|>Can't wait for C to gains `IFS()` so I can write my entire program in one long, thin, uneditable line.<|eor|><|sor|>Yes officer, this comment right here.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | ASaltedRainbow | gnp5rvo | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|sor|>I think this version is much clearer
#include <stdio.h>
#define if
#define then ?
#define else :
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
const char *msg = if argc == 2 then argv[1] else "lol no if-expressions";
printf("%s\n", msg);
return 0;
}<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | muntaxitome | gnohgf8 | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|sor|>I usually combine ternary operators and goto for maximum triggering of code reviewers<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | mudkip908 | gnoxq51 | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|sor|>> You may wish to look at the Bourne shell source for other macros to make C readable.
[lol](https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V7/usr/src/cmd/sh/mac.h)<|eor|><|sor|>[Example code](https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V7/usr/src/cmd/sh/xec.c)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | witcher_rat | gno4rt7 | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|soopr|>Making C excel-complete.<|eoopr|><|sor|>My my, how the tables TERN.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | Poddster | gnnvc2n | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|soopr|>Making C excel-complete.<|eoopr|><|sor|>Can't wait for C to gains `IFS()` so I can write my entire program in one long, thin, uneditable line.<|eor|><|sor|>Preprocessor directive kinda ruin this paradigm (although you can get around this by manually declaring functions), but there is nothing stopping you right now from writing code in one long line.<|eor|><|sor|>> but there is nothing stopping you right now from writing code in one long line.
Trust me, there is.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | BarefootUnicorn | gnohh6h | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|sor|>I hear that Rust is getting first-hand support for *ligible ternaries* so we won't have to do tricks like this.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | gnno83o | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|sor|>[Elsewhere in the thread](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26153147):
> I've been designing a programming language where nothing is a side-effect including calling conventions, processor caches, branch predictors, locks, graphics modes, etc.. Runtime has to be independent of the value of the input would be how that language expresses "constant time" and it would take into account every part of the compiler's model of the target architecture (which, by the way, is also described in the code) so for a sufficiently-simple, sufficiently-well-modelled architecture, the generated code could be provably Spectre-proof given sufficient assumptions (Eis's take on Rust's `unsafe`).<|eor|><|soopr|>Post it dude.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | theangeryemacsshibe | gnpl7pi | <|sols|><|sot|>"#define TERN(c, a, b) c ? a : b".."I'm not a fan of ternaries, but that macro makes it kind of more ligible."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26151366<|eol|><|sor|>\#1=OpenCL has a `select` where `select(c, b, a)` is `a ? b : c` and I hate it.
(with-unjerk #1#)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | ktv8tn | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 134 |
programmingcirclejerk | officerthegeek | giozg4l | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>Half of hackernews has no interest in in depth articles. Go to r/programmingcirclejerk for that.<|eor|><|sor|>Half of /r/programmingcirclejerk has no interest in in depth articles. Go fuck yourself.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 103 |
programmingcirclejerk | Temp2106 | gion13d | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>Half of the comments on hackernews start with I. People there love to talk about themselves.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 63 |
programmingcirclejerk | 757DrDuck | giowlg3 | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>\uj /r/programming should be renamed to /r/tech_news and /r/technology should become /r/tech_policy<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 50 |
programmingcirclejerk | VitulusAureus | gip9s9l | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>Half of the comments on hackernews start with I. People there love to talk about themselves.<|eor|><|sor|>Half of the comments in this thread start with half. People here love to talk about halves.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 47 |
programmingcirclejerk | HINDBRAIN | gioy3iq | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>\uj /r/programming should be renamed to /r/tech_news and /r/technology should become /r/tech_policy<|eor|><|sor|>/r/technology is not even tech related, is it? Have a look, it's all just trump capitol capitol capitol trump.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 36 |
programmingcirclejerk | Thirty_Seventh | gipqis2 | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>Half of hackernews has no interest in in depth articles. Go to r/programmingcirclejerk for that.<|eor|><|sor|>Half of /r/programmingcirclejerk has no interest in in depth articles. Go fuck yourself.<|eor|><|sor|>Half of myself has no interest in in depth articles. I'm going to /r/programming.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 35 |
programmingcirclejerk | UsingYourWifi | gip67y8 | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>I find it in bad taste to complain about /r/programming. They can't help it that for the mentally deficient 14 year old 0.5X'ers there, something like 'PHP bad' is of incredible depth.<|eor|><|sor|>But... php bad.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 29 |
programmingcirclejerk | muntaxitome | gioyb3u | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>I find it in bad taste to complain about /r/programming. They can't help it that for the mentally deficient 14 year old 0.5X'ers there, something like 'PHP bad' is of incredible depth.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 26 |
programmingcirclejerk | nmarshall23 | giopp1t | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>I agree.
Most in-depth articles are not read on reddit.
Go to TV tropes for in-depth articles.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | anon_09_09 | gipja84 | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>\uj /r/programming should be renamed to /r/tech_news and /r/technology should become /r/tech_policy<|eor|><|sor|>/r/technology is not even tech related, is it? Have a look, it's all just trump capitol capitol capitol trump.<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>The peak of that sub was when [an article about "tiktok bad", which source was reddit comment without sources, got 65k upvotes.](https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/hgwe3c/guy_who_reverseengineered_tiktok_reveals_the/)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 19 |
programmingcirclejerk | csb06 | gipnm29 | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>> sometimes it even feels like people commenting [on HN] don't even read past the headline which makes the discussions go all over the place.
lol this definitely isn't a recent trend.
In the replies, a suggestion of an HN replacement:
> Lobste.rs
*sigh*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 12 |
programmingcirclejerk | republitard_2 | giq2rgx | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>I find it in bad taste to complain about /r/programming. They can't help it that for the mentally deficient 14 year old 0.5X'ers there, something like 'PHP bad' is of incredible depth.<|eor|><|sor|>But... php bad.<|eor|><|sor|>Wow. Such deep.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | n3f4s | gir5zul | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>I find it in bad taste to complain about /r/programming. They can't help it that for the mentally deficient 14 year old 0.5X'ers there, something like 'PHP bad' is of incredible depth.<|eor|><|sor|>But... php bad.<|eor|><|sor|>I'm copying that to /r/programming for free internet points<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | gipnhxr | <|sols|><|sot|>half of /r/programming has no interest in in depth articles. Go to hackernews for that.<|eot|><|sol|>https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/ktq8j7/openais_dalle_generate_images_from_just_text/ginpzel/<|eol|><|sor|>\uj /r/programming should be renamed to /r/tech_news and /r/technology should become /r/tech_policy<|eor|><|sor|>/r/technology is not even tech related, is it? Have a look, it's all just trump capitol capitol capitol trump.<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>/uj
Don't recall ever going to r/technology before, but are you sure you're jerking?
Because the first post I saw was:
> *Workers demand Amazon Web drop Parler over posts inciting violence after Capitol riot*
And it's spot on with your description of how to post there.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | priestmuffin | k6xkwe | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 136 |
programmingcirclejerk | orgulodfan82 | genvp4n | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>These arcane, ivory-tower techniques like counting up a number and setting it back to 0 when it reaches 3 have got nothing to do with programming ability. I generate value for my employer by writing the same code over and over again with varying table names. Never have I ever needed this obscure modulus operator and honestly I can't begin to imagine what it would be used for.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 128 |
programmingcirclejerk | lucasreta | geo5zg4 | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>These arcane, ivory-tower techniques like counting up a number and setting it back to 0 when it reaches 3 have got nothing to do with programming ability. I generate value for my employer by writing the same code over and over again with varying table names. Never have I ever needed this obscure modulus operator and honestly I can't begin to imagine what it would be used for.<|eor|><|sor|>The fact that someone can be rejected from a programming job just because he doesn't know how to iterate through an array, assign a value to a variable or declare a function just shows the sad and primitive state which we find ourselves in.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 83 |
programmingcirclejerk | csb06 | geo31ia | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>/uj Coding interviews are stupid in lots of ways (e.g. grinding leetcode for 4 months in the hyperbolic time chamber in preparation for an entry-level job where you mostly copy paste stuff from stack overflow for 8 hours a day), but fizzbuzz? Thats not one of the dumb things.
/rj Many of my fellow code bros have fallen to the vicious fizzbuzz question, the mind-bending nature of which is nearly impossible to overcome.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 77 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | genkhsb | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>"controversial opinion" that's just stupid lmao.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 70 |
programmingcirclejerk | lucasreta | geo71mu | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>Obviously this guy didn't get the job.<|eor|><|sor|>Being fair, FizzBuzz is pretty hard to crack. So far I've got:
if (number == 1) echo "1";
if (number == 2) echo "2";
if (number == 3) echo "Fizz";
if (number == 4) echo "4";
if (number == 5) echo "Buzz";
if (number == 6) echo "6";
if (number == 7) echo "7";
Still don't know how to get it to print Fizz for 6.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 52 |
programmingcirclejerk | qh4os | geo8r3t | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>Tbh modulous isnt really that useful, Ive probably used it only a handful % 5 times<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 39 |
programmingcirclejerk | Audiblade | geoi7gc | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>Ffs this is so easy, here:
int fizzbuzz(num) {
str = "";
for(int n = 1; n < 15; n+) {
if (n % 3 == 0) {
str += "Fizz";
}
if (n % 5) {
str += "Buzz";
} else {
if (n % 3 == n % 5) {
str += "Fizz";
str += "Buzz";
}
} else {
return n;
}
}
resolve(num);
}<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 37 |
programmingcirclejerk | LiseKaramazov | genkyxn | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>Link broke<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | genoz6t | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>"controversial opinion" that's just stupid lmao.<|eor|><|sor|>It's inconvenient in the way that truth often is<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32 |
programmingcirclejerk | OpsikionThemed | gep5tr2 | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>Link broke<|eor|><|sor|>lol not knowing how to manually enter hn url given post id<|eor|><|sor|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve HN URLs doesn't necessarily indicate lack of jerking ability.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32 |
programmingcirclejerk | officerthegeek | geomdb8 | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>Ffs this is so easy, here:
int fizzbuzz(num) {
str = "";
for(int n = 1; n < 15; n+) {
if (n % 3 == 0) {
str += "Fizz";
}
if (n % 5) {
str += "Buzz";
} else {
if (n % 3 == n % 5) {
str += "Fizz";
str += "Buzz";
}
} else {
return n;
}
}
resolve(num);
}<|eor|><|sor|>Recent graduates, this is the sort of person you're competing against for a job. And you still can't get one.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 28 |
programmingcirclejerk | mywaterlooaccount | genm4ar | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>Link broke<|eor|><|sor|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25308092<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 27 |
programmingcirclejerk | GOPHERS_GONE_WILD | geo83bf | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>TIL the arcane modulus operator is the only way to test if a number is divisible by another number! How did they do this before computers?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | grimonce | geokd9d | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Creating i/o module from scratch and using it for hello world might indicate a 0.1xer.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 24 |
programmingcirclejerk | BarefootUnicorn | geo4k5n | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>Obviously this guy didn't get the job.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | sebamestre | gep1lpr | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>Ffs this is so easy, here:
int fizzbuzz(num) {
str = "";
for(int n = 1; n < 15; n+) {
if (n % 3 == 0) {
str += "Fizz";
}
if (n % 5) {
str += "Buzz";
} else {
if (n % 3 == n % 5) {
str += "Fizz";
str += "Buzz";
}
} else {
return n;
}
}
resolve(num);
}<|eor|><|sor|>/uj my first thought was that you are lost redditor. After looking more closely, I realized that your comment is a beautifully suble jerk. Well done.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | Volt | geok92l | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>Ffs this is so easy, here:
int fizzbuzz(num) {
str = "";
for(int n = 1; n < 15; n+) {
if (n % 3 == 0) {
str += "Fizz";
}
if (n % 5) {
str += "Buzz";
} else {
if (n % 3 == n % 5) {
str += "Fizz";
str += "Buzz";
}
} else {
return n;
}
}
resolve(num);
}<|eor|><|sor|>No job for you<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 17 |
programmingcirclejerk | grimonce | geokie0 | <|sols|><|sot|>Controversial opinion of my own: not being able to solve fizzbuzz doesn't necessarily indicate lack of programming ability.<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/reply?id=25308092<|eol|><|sor|>Ffs this is so easy, here:
int fizzbuzz(num) {
str = "";
for(int n = 1; n < 15; n+) {
if (n % 3 == 0) {
str += "Fizz";
}
if (n % 5) {
str += "Buzz";
} else {
if (n % 3 == n % 5) {
str += "Fizz";
str += "Buzz";
}
} else {
return n;
}
}
resolve(num);
}<|eor|><|sor|>Not the brightest 10x dev example here.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 16 |
programmingcirclejerk | logicchains | hezp3s | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 135 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | fvupqvq | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|> <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 69 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | fvuvd00 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|>> Simple patterns are vastly better than complex frameworks
I agree. And in Go you get to repeat the simple patterns for every type or combination of types.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 61 |
programmingcirclejerk | logicchains | fvud1gq | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|soopr|>Orange crab bad, gopher good.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 54 |
programmingcirclejerk | Testiclese | fvv44my | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|>> Simple patterns are vastly better than complex frameworks
I agree. And in Go you get to repeat the simple patterns for every type or combination of types.<|eor|><|sor|>Only beginner Gophers struggle with that. Once you gain some experience, you just delegate the repetition to a few well-written Emacs functions.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 44 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | fvuprpl | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|>lel justifying wageslaving harder and thinking less.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 43 |
programmingcirclejerk | binaryblade | fvvfmc8 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|> <|eor|><|sor|>> O R P O I S E S<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | UsingYourWifi | fvvcobf | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|>> Simple patterns are vastly better than complex frameworks
I agree. And in Go you get to repeat the simple patterns for every type or combination of types.<|eor|><|sor|>Only beginner Gophers struggle with that. Once you gain some experience, you just delegate the repetition to a few well-written Emacs functions.<|eor|><|sor|>And that is a stepping stone to porting your entire stack to finely crafted Emacs functions.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 20 |
programmingcirclejerk | Elsolar | fvvadwh | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>RYE: Repeat Yourself Everywhere<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | Karyo_Ten | fvvb2re | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|>I wonder why I even bother learning Assembly. I should program with raw bytes instead.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 15 |
programmingcirclejerk | skulgnome | fvvqhte | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|>Tired of that good old bible-thumping Christianity? Worship almighty Satan instead!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | MediocreRedditor | fvwfmz0 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>I think you mean WET: Write Everything Twice<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 10 |
programmingcirclejerk | fp_weenie | fvwuy7m | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|>> Simple patterns are vastly better than complex frameworks
I agree. And in Go you get to repeat the simple patterns for every type or combination of types.<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>> I'd like to find, I don't know, some ivory tower Haskal shop where programmers were so happy with their tools.
lel being happy instead of detached and logical<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | Sunscratch | fvv9eoi | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|>What else can you say when you dont have generics...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | kizerkizer | fvwhk8f | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|soopr|>Orange crab bad, gopher good.<|eoopr|><|sor|>Brachiosaurus best now new fresh<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | ProfessorSexyTime | fvvj0zm | <|sols|><|sot|>"Its hard to flip your brain, but abstractions are bad. Copying code for different business purposes is good."<|eot|><|sol|>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23613634<|eol|><|sor|>> Simple patterns are vastly better than complex frameworks
I agree. And in Go you get to repeat the simple patterns for every type or combination of types.<|eor|><|sor|>Only beginner Gophers struggle with that. Once you gain some experience, you just delegate the repetition to a few well-written Emacs functions.<|eor|><|sor|>> Emacs functions
Hey Gramps, we have these things called [auto-insert-mode](https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/autotype/Autoinserting.html) and ["snippets"](http://joaotavora.github.io/yasnippet/) for awhile now.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | h12ki4 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Writing Rust makes you appear smart, even if you fail. Because we all know systems programming is hard and there are crazily smart people working in Rust, so if youre a Rustacean, youre smart by association."<|eot|><|sol|>https://users.rust-lang.org/t/isnt-rust-too-difficult-to-be-widely-adopted/6173/15<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 132 |
programmingcirclejerk | RAKtheUndead | ftpz5h6 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Writing Rust makes you appear smart, even if you fail. Because we all know systems programming is hard and there are crazily smart people working in Rust, so if youre a Rustacean, youre smart by association."<|eot|><|sol|>https://users.rust-lang.org/t/isnt-rust-too-difficult-to-be-widely-adopted/6173/15<|eol|><|sor|>Where's the jerk?<|eor|><|sor|>The suggestion that Rustaceans actually do anything with system programming which doesn't amount to a toy project.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 47 |
programmingcirclejerk | TheLastMeritocrat | ftqspkz | <|sols|><|sot|>"Writing Rust makes you appear smart, even if you fail. Because we all know systems programming is hard and there are crazily smart people working in Rust, so if youre a Rustacean, youre smart by association."<|eot|><|sol|>https://users.rust-lang.org/t/isnt-rust-too-difficult-to-be-widely-adopted/6173/15<|eol|><|sor|>> For me, the first edition of Rusts The Book was not very helpful and there was no other reference book available at the time. Reading Blandy & Orendorffs Programming Rust definitely helped me, but I would still rank Rust as the most difficult language for me.
> I expect Rust will grow in usage, but I doubt it will ever become one of the top 10 languages. I dont think that we will ever have another language like C and C++, that dominates both system and big application programming. Almost every program which I use on a daily basis today (Linux kernel, GNOME, Apache, LibreOffice, MySQL, PHP, Chromium, Acrobat Reader, etc.) was written in C or C++, and I dont think that Rust will ever grow to that position. I expect that Rust will expand to new areas like robotics, embedded programming, web services, etc, but I dont think it will ever become the dominant language in any area, because of its steep learning curve. I expect that we will see greater diversity in the future with many languages occupying the current position of C/C++. However, a language with a simpler syntax and easier learning curve like Swift is more likely than Rust to become the next big systems programming language. I dont know if the next C/C++ will be Swift itself, but it is likely to be a similar language. The growth of Swift depends on whether it can become popular outside of the Apple ecosystem and it will need to be managed as a true open source project with many organizations participating in order for it to spread to Windows, Linux, embedded development, etc.
[destroyer of hopes, dreams and worlds](https://m.hindustantimes.com/rf/image_size_640x362/HT/p2/2016/10/29/Pictures/_b8bb86a6-9db0-11e6-84cd-7afcc7591aa7.tif)<|eor|><|sor|>As someone who got a BA and MA in history, but never took a single computer science class, my experience as a computer programmer shows that there are multiple paths to learning how to code. Having studied 5 foreign languages and having learned some linguistics gives me a much greater appreciation for how computer science languages are constructed. It is hard for me to say whether having studied Latin helped me learn C, but I know that they required similar thought processes when learning both of them, since they are both logical languages with complex grammar rules[.](https://amosbbatto.wordpress.com/2020/03/24/questions-raised-study-coding/)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 23 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | ftpm4c5 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Writing Rust makes you appear smart, even if you fail. Because we all know systems programming is hard and there are crazily smart people working in Rust, so if youre a Rustacean, youre smart by association."<|eot|><|sol|>https://users.rust-lang.org/t/isnt-rust-too-difficult-to-be-widely-adopted/6173/15<|eol|><|soopr|>Interestingly, his username is quite close to "illogical"<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 18 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | ftrea5r | <|sols|><|sot|>"Writing Rust makes you appear smart, even if you fail. Because we all know systems programming is hard and there are crazily smart people working in Rust, so if youre a Rustacean, youre smart by association."<|eot|><|sol|>https://users.rust-lang.org/t/isnt-rust-too-difficult-to-be-widely-adopted/6173/15<|eol|><|sor|>> For me, the first edition of Rusts The Book was not very helpful and there was no other reference book available at the time. Reading Blandy & Orendorffs Programming Rust definitely helped me, but I would still rank Rust as the most difficult language for me.
> I expect Rust will grow in usage, but I doubt it will ever become one of the top 10 languages. I dont think that we will ever have another language like C and C++, that dominates both system and big application programming. Almost every program which I use on a daily basis today (Linux kernel, GNOME, Apache, LibreOffice, MySQL, PHP, Chromium, Acrobat Reader, etc.) was written in C or C++, and I dont think that Rust will ever grow to that position. I expect that Rust will expand to new areas like robotics, embedded programming, web services, etc, but I dont think it will ever become the dominant language in any area, because of its steep learning curve. I expect that we will see greater diversity in the future with many languages occupying the current position of C/C++. However, a language with a simpler syntax and easier learning curve like Swift is more likely than Rust to become the next big systems programming language. I dont know if the next C/C++ will be Swift itself, but it is likely to be a similar language. The growth of Swift depends on whether it can become popular outside of the Apple ecosystem and it will need to be managed as a true open source project with many organizations participating in order for it to spread to Windows, Linux, embedded development, etc.
[destroyer of hopes, dreams and worlds](https://m.hindustantimes.com/rf/image_size_640x362/HT/p2/2016/10/29/Pictures/_b8bb86a6-9db0-11e6-84cd-7afcc7591aa7.tif)<|eor|><|sor|>As someone who got a BA and MA in history, but never took a single computer science class, my experience as a computer programmer shows that there are multiple paths to learning how to code. Having studied 5 foreign languages and having learned some linguistics gives me a much greater appreciation for how computer science languages are constructed. It is hard for me to say whether having studied Latin helped me learn C, but I know that they required similar thought processes when learning both of them, since they are both logical languages with complex grammar rules[.](https://amosbbatto.wordpress.com/2020/03/24/questions-raised-study-coding/)<|eor|><|sor|>> It is hard for me to say whether having studied Latin helped me learn C, but I know that they required similar thought processes when learning both of them, since they are both
dead ends with both missing rules and rules that should be missing<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 13 |
programmingcirclejerk | affectation_man | fukvnna | <|sols|><|sot|>"Writing Rust makes you appear smart, even if you fail. Because we all know systems programming is hard and there are crazily smart people working in Rust, so if youre a Rustacean, youre smart by association."<|eot|><|sol|>https://users.rust-lang.org/t/isnt-rust-too-difficult-to-be-widely-adopted/6173/15<|eol|><|sor|>My IQ gets a +40 boost when in the company of Rust core devs, but only +10 if I merge in one of their commits<|eor|><|sor|>Honestly my IQ surpassed 180 last week. I've been coding Rust for about a year.<|eor|><|sor|>Damn, it takes three Dart programmers combined to score 180<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 11 |
programmingcirclejerk | camelCaseIsWebScale | fullsm0 | <|sols|><|sot|>"Writing Rust makes you appear smart, even if you fail. Because we all know systems programming is hard and there are crazily smart people working in Rust, so if youre a Rustacean, youre smart by association."<|eot|><|sol|>https://users.rust-lang.org/t/isnt-rust-too-difficult-to-be-widely-adopted/6173/15<|eol|><|sor|>My IQ gets a +40 boost when in the company of Rust core devs, but only +10 if I merge in one of their commits<|eor|><|sor|>Honestly my IQ surpassed 180 last week. I've been coding Rust for about a year.<|eor|><|sor|>Damn, it takes three Dart programmers combined to score 180<|eor|><|soopr|>Or 180 go programmers.<|eoopr|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 8 |
programmingcirclejerk | Cameltotem | fukoeus | <|sols|><|sot|>"Writing Rust makes you appear smart, even if you fail. Because we all know systems programming is hard and there are crazily smart people working in Rust, so if youre a Rustacean, youre smart by association."<|eot|><|sol|>https://users.rust-lang.org/t/isnt-rust-too-difficult-to-be-widely-adopted/6173/15<|eol|><|sor|>My IQ gets a +40 boost when in the company of Rust core devs, but only +10 if I merge in one of their commits<|eor|><|sor|>Honestly my IQ surpassed 180 last week. I've been coding Rust for about a year.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 7 |
programmingcirclejerk | bruce3434 | ftrh3jn | <|sols|><|sot|>"Writing Rust makes you appear smart, even if you fail. Because we all know systems programming is hard and there are crazily smart people working in Rust, so if youre a Rustacean, youre smart by association."<|eot|><|sol|>https://users.rust-lang.org/t/isnt-rust-too-difficult-to-be-widely-adopted/6173/15<|eol|><|sor|>I can't believe llogiq said this lmao<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 6 |
programmingcirclejerk | sacules | h012m2 | <|sols|><|sot|>How does it feel to type the command? [...] For example, sha256sum feels like gargling sand, but Wireshark's capinfos command is a soft breeze across the keys.<|eot|><|sol|>https://smallstep.com/blog/the-poetics-of-cli-command-names/<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 131 |
programmingcirclejerk | VeganVagiVore | ftjhyi6 | <|sols|><|sot|>How does it feel to type the command? [...] For example, sha256sum feels like gargling sand, but Wireshark's capinfos command is a soft breeze across the keys.<|eot|><|sol|>https://smallstep.com/blog/the-poetics-of-cli-command-names/<|eol|><|sor|>Why is no one talking about the handfeel?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 84 |
programmingcirclejerk | rafgro | ftk4fcd | <|sols|><|sot|>How does it feel to type the command? [...] For example, sha256sum feels like gargling sand, but Wireshark's capinfos command is a soft breeze across the keys.<|eot|><|sol|>https://smallstep.com/blog/the-poetics-of-cli-command-names/<|eol|><|sor|>When I write `if err != nil` I feel like Chopin playing Nocturne in E-flat major, Op. 9, No. 2<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 69 |
programmingcirclejerk | aly5321 | ftk0alb | <|sols|><|sot|>How does it feel to type the command? [...] For example, sha256sum feels like gargling sand, but Wireshark's capinfos command is a soft breeze across the keys.<|eot|><|sol|>https://smallstep.com/blog/the-poetics-of-cli-command-names/<|eol|><|sor|>At Facebook's engineering orientation, while explaining why mercurial is better than git, the very first point made was that you'll be 33% faster by having to type less (git -> hg). I involuntarily groaned out loud.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 53 |
programmingcirclejerk | silentconfessor | ftjr866 | <|sols|><|sot|>How does it feel to type the command? [...] For example, sha256sum feels like gargling sand, but Wireshark's capinfos command is a soft breeze across the keys.<|eot|><|sol|>https://smallstep.com/blog/the-poetics-of-cli-command-names/<|eol|><|sor|>Why is no one talking about the handfeel?<|eor|><|sor|>Ease of typing is of critical importance to 10x jerkers, because only one of their hands can be placed on the keyboard at any given time.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 50 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.