text stringlengths 0 9.69k |
|---|
<poi> |
An inherent part of a fight is struggle. you're allowed to struggle in a fight, and you're allowed to show that struggle this narrative, isn't about strength. it is about struggle inherently? |
</poi> |
Yes, if we discuss it theoretically, know that even the strongest people are likely to move towards doubt in these situations, you are facing the strongest existential dread you have ever faced. Everything around you all support structures and feelings of protein are grumbling. This means that the negativity is probabl... |
</mg> |
<mo> |
We are going to close the gap in the opening opposition we're going to explicitly explain you why in absence of this narrative, the alternative narrative that is going to be created, also engaging with CG, is going to be more problematic and worse for people with terminal diseases rather than not. But just before that,... |
impact of the debate. One point of rebuttal towards causing government rest of it is integrated. We think that the choice about you coming out to people isn't as free as they claim to be. It's usually binary. Why? Because when you tell one person, they're likely to tell the other person because they think that this is ... |
limited quantity of people are seeing these sorts of things like cancer, autoimmune disease, etc. So it's not something we generally talk about. It's not something that's used on a daily basis, etc. And there is a general, notice this is a regression motion. This is important. This is from the past. Generally there is ... |
people have an inherent mechanism to not want to engage in these sorts of things because they see it as bad, because they see it as problematic to them. So the reason why a narrative will be problematic. Not that people have limited capacity to engage in such sort of things. They have their job, they have their respons... |
cut rules as to what necessarily they'll have to say. They will most likely opt in and drop into the specific of their like versions of these particular of these particular people. What is the likely version than what you're thinking of? This is a dead man walking. This is someone who is likely to going to die in the f... |
So, you know, this will be the opening opposition, by the way, because they never put this on the platform. Let's get into again the mechanism. First mechanism. We think it's easier for you to come out with these sorts of diseases and talk with people once we get once we once these sorts of deals. Why is this? Why is t... |
things for your family. So when you come out and say like for example I have cancer or autoimmune diseases etc. People are thinking that we're doing oh shit his family is going to have a hard time, they're going to have problems, they're going to have these sorts of things because they're going to lose someone who is b... |
What is the Western civilization in people in the West, etcetera, genre, view heroes and heroic ships and fighting as something very important. It is in great in the society and it's an image that is easily associated with. You have multiple outlets of how you can see these sorts of things, heroes in movies, books, etc... |
has been going to. People who have survived and defeated the disease because we thought there's a white political disease, there's a white political disease of different diseases can capitalize and say, look, I have won. I have did all of these sorts of things. The post is possible for you to do all these things. Well,... |
particular reason why you will come out earlier or come out in general about these sorts of diseases and give the information as fast as possible. Why is this so important? Three four impacts based on this. Firstly, When you come out and when you tell these sorts of things, it's like an anvil drop from your head. You a... |
on yourself. You dwell on this disease progresses and you feel even more bad and more bad. Secondly, strictly part-time. It's new ones here. Also later on the line, but we view this is problematic also because we don't see it as fast enough. You are likely to skip out an important treatment that may be the difference b... |
Because usually in the alternative, when this positive narrative doesn't doesn't exist, and when, for example, your your family on both this important frame here, by the way, your family on both sides of the house will want you to fight the disease. Why? Because on both sides of the house, they want equally, for you to... |
<poi> |
given that people probably naturally want to survive. And as you say, your family also wants you to survive, or at least some members of your family do. Why is the... |
</poi> |
No? No? Because, because in these sorts of situations, you're irrational. In the alternative, you don't know how to react in these particular situations. It's not an important issue. It isn't as talked about as possible. You don't have the specific outlines as to what you're supposed to do. this is the this is the comp... |
This isn't like the binary thing, right? Over time, you can specifically engage on your own versions of what this is likely to be. You can see what your version is, how to what extent you're fighting the chemotherapy, etcetera. When you're talking about choice in this debate, there is a metric. You have more choice whe... |
</mo> |
<gw> |
Greetings in this speech, counterfactual mechanisms and impacts and why we win on all three of this. recognize that i want to ask this in a POI to opening opposition, so that they talk about this a lot more, so that they kind of like win over opening garment, but they didn't want to accept the POI. but we recognize tha... |
the narratives themselves in the narrative market of ideas shape. And I think this is the most important than second rate impact to how you personally view the world without engaging with this specific part. There, there cannot be impacts that determine whether you're more likely to survive or less likely to survive, w... |
picture of what is influencing people's survival trip or like against cancer when they talk and when they deal their cases. So this is why it's important that we show you why the narrative will not be replaced by pity or some other coercive narrative. I think opening government also, uh, consists that this is very impo... |
a lot of good content, but it's not comparative because other things are going to happen instead of this. I think that the relationship between fight and PD is a one where the fighter narrative feeds the pity narrative and they are then reinforcing once another. If we move the fighter narrative, that means that we are ... |
you are with the family or as I'm going to explain later this is not the most important mechanism as OG assumes but other influences on your on your being such as when listening to other survivors or when listening to the media and all of these other things this is what you get as an influence on you right so the outwa... |
or how you cannot breathe. And this is a narrative of pity, right? Why does this happen? Because it's important to show that this is not chicken or the argument here, because you feel that the person has a lot of extra things to do because you have applied the fight narrative. You have applied the duty to fight towards... |
and you're talking with other folks who are also seeing the person, but when you talk to the person, then you are all you need to be so brave and so brave. This is a much more nuanced characterization of how the narratives are actually shaping each other. And this is why in the absence of this, we are left with what te... |
OG relies mostly on your near the near surroundings family. I think when you have cancer, what's probably true for you is that you are in the hospital or any other serious disease, which means that your family can only be with you one hour a day and you cannot have your cell phone all the time, especially if you're old... |
fight as part of why you survived. You do not say I was lucky or you do not say I changed my habits. I stopped smoking or stopped eating. But you say I was a fighter. I was in the mindset that my serotonin is going to defeat cancer. This is very detrimental because you then because spread this message to other people. ... |
less from the immediate family surroundings, or a lot non-comparative in this idea, except for the mixing of the pity versus the fighter narrative, but mostly from people who have much more influence on you in this situation, because probably like people will either way, it's non-comparative that you're not gonna talk ... |
and they don't talk about your will. They talk about your will and not doing your will and not confessing or closure, blah, blah, blah. What we prove is that your likelihood of surviving is a lot less under their side of the house. I think this is the most important impact. I'll explain this after I take a POI from all... |
<poi> |
The feelings of despair are not a narrative. They're intrinsic to the arduous treatment process. Without the narrative of fight, you're left. You're left at the mercy of those feelings of despair. |
</poi> |
Yeah. I told you are fighting the clash that you fought with OG already and I'm not sure who wins there because humans are biologically, you know what, you know, this is fight or flight. Humans are both biologically, how is it, predisposed to flight as or wants them to believe or OG to fight, which is why you should ha... |
or stop eating fat and all of this shit that you need to do in order to defeat your disease. But this is crucial because it lets people live more than what opening opposition wants to prove in this debate. This actually shows that people are more likely to survive comparatively with the idea on opening opposition that ... |
chances, right? Because when the narrative is not that you need to be a fighter or that someone needs to feel pity for you, this is when you can objectively then assess what the best theft over survival is. Sometimes it's very good that you are on a defensive and that you withdraw on the battlefield. The same thing is ... |
</gw> |
<ow> |
While both governments are fighting over who has the right counterfactual we are already winning this debate. Frankly, we did already win this debate. Why though? First of all, it's important to understand that our analysis is not contingent on fighter being replaced by pity. And this is extremely what Rumen's analysis... |
reasons as to what exactly are going to be the influences over you when you get that information and how you're going to react based on those influence. He talks about having the ability basically to have limited time to make a decision. He talked about how hard it is to talk about this in particular, especially since ... |
explains to you the counterfactual in the context of information. Because he explains to you very directly, this fight mentality pictures the people as heroes, as positive people, which makes them them when they receive that information and they start fighting, prone to talk about it publicly more. This means that ther... |
the sides of the house. On their side of the house, there's going to be likely to be much less, less people who have been in your situation in the first place. But secondly, and most importantly, have talked about their own experience, meaning that you get much less of a chance to actually basically get the right infor... |
some guidelines. And we say on our side of the house, it is far more likely to have certain initial guidelines. Now, how is this important in the long term? It is important because at this particular moment, when you're in that cabinet, when you receive that information, you have extremely emotional, you're impacted by... |
What is your concept of life and death what what what is happen or what is happening? You're sick of all of this new information and this basically complete shaking of your world and you're likely to act drastically This is the moment in which you don't you you do bad things such as take a big bad loan such as Maybe ... |
you do stupid things such as, for example, fight with some members or not to reconciliation with other people, etcetera, etcetera. This is the moment in which, in some cases, you take your own life because in that particular moment, you feel like that. And this is why we believe at that moment, when you're in that cabi... |
impact of existing narrative that provides you certain guidelines. And what we say on the comparative is that over time, you still have that choice whether to accept that narrative or not accept it. And we feel that you're in a much better position over time to make that decision than what is in government cases. Now, ... |
I think that CG's case, although they try to prove you certain new narrative is pretty much derivative of opening. They basically talk about free choice of individuals and where you have more ability. It's the same impact. It doesn't really matter. I see, I see you always agree with me right over there. But most import... |
reason why number one. Second reason is in terms of you getting more and more information. Because look, ask yourself, which choice is better? The informed one, the one lived to personal experience, or the one which is based on your previous notions of that, which were never, never really that close. And this is what w... |
This is fight or flight mechanism. this is not how actually it works. so fight or flight mechanism works on their side. in the case in which somebody is stopping me directly, it doesn't work in terms of me receiving that information and then deciding what to do. so this is completely out of the debate. what's most impo... |
have more individual choice. Everything else is debate bullshit about narratives limiting your choices. We're grown up people, we can make our own decisions, especially we have more information. This is how we win this debate. And I think that in these key comparisons, we also prove to you numerous individual impacts, ... |
people make the right decision. And I think that all of this and this particular counterfactual being established brings it over over opening in terms of why exactly despair is going to happen and what despair looks like and what is going to happen when you're in that state. Very happy to maybe become a linear world ca... |
</ow> |
<pm> |
We're going to be talking about three things in opening government today. Firstly, why this veto is a principally legitimate exercise for these unions and organizations to have. Secondly, why you get more qualified nominees and checks and balances over the policymaking process. And thirdly, why you get better policymak... |
as education secretary. So this policy operates on a more granular level. Secondly, this is far more specific form of control over the state than voting because it deals with specific regulation that is industry specific. I. e. you don't know what kind of like minister education guidelines are going to be passed like ... |
the absolute worst cases in corrupt states, for example, far fewer patronage appointments because these people aren't seen as unqualified, are seen as unqualified, for example, they get vetoed by that nominee to a significantly greater degree. How does this change policymaking? I think that firstly, the people who get... |
</pm> |
<lo> |
i'm going to start by outlining what the counterfactual looks like for appointments and then talk about two things. Firstly on representation and just getting good people and then secondly about industry-wide corruption on our alternative. So i think what happens under the status quo is consultation with industry exper... |
final say. I want to respond to the og thing here of like awesome groups of asymmetric lobbying I think that this is a little bit odd like if you're an industrial union i'm kind of unclear why you're going to try and shape the education minister ultimately is, like presumably there's still a checking mechanism for this... |
are going to be loyalist, whereas they might allow for compare comparatively more meritocracy to get good policy under the status quo. |
We tend to not allow the government to go rogue and they monitor each individual appointment that tends to take place. What this means is that there's an inherent feedback mechanism that's created to the state because obviously there's an implicit incentive to appoint people who are going to be aligned with what the p... |
The reason for this is that in order to rise to the top, it requires a lot of connections that tend to take time to be able to cultivate. We need to be likable in order to get people to like you, which often just coalesce around white man with these industries to a massive extent, meaning they're often just older and ... |
<poi> |
Do you think that the most property net capitalized system was acquired justly? |
</poi> |
Sure, I really understand the relevance of that. Okay, on industry-based corruption. I think that industry leaders are always going to have an incentive to push for under-regulation of their own respective sectors. Firstly, just regulation always tends to conflict with the bottom line of their industry to a massive ext... |
I think that then like the proper response to this is like otherwise you're going to regulate the state. This is substantially more difficult to be able to do. Firstly, there's just a wider number of interest groups who are constantly logging the state. So it's difficult to just store your own policy priority relative... |
</lo> |
<dpm> |
Before I start, I just want to say I think all the property was justly acquired because you had to work for it. And insert any other reasons if Cg, if CG tries to run it, it's a direct knife of their opening. A little bit of characterization for getting into some rebuttal. I think this debate really matters at the poin... |
here is, for example, we don't do everything via majority decision making where the majority of people get to decide everything else for the minorities, for example, We have like minority protections that exist that represent disproportionate power or disproportionate influence that can affect minorities asymmetrically... |
But secondarily, by OG's own analysis, if these are issues that affect everyone else in society, then by definition, they cannot only care about their own industry. But secondarily, I don't think these are really issues that aren't as like a that aren't really asymmetric between everyone. I think these industry reps h... |
Now yes, that exists with every policy and every citizen, but this is a question of degree and how isolated these experts are. Now, I don't think democracy is actually one vote and one equal slice of power. Insofar as the implications of this policy have particular effects on people that last longer more than others. ... |
But second, we recognize that the industry shouldn't control it. We're not saying the industry gets to make every policy for the country. That would be abhorrent. We recognize that would be like principally on democratic. We recognize the industry should have a balance. That is to say, it should be a balanced represen... |
<poi> |
So as you can see, there will probably be conversations about what exactly you will and what met through. So obviously, this is not a balance. It is the disproportionate effect that is going to be weaponized against everyone. |
</poi> |
The reason why it's a balance and it can't be a conversation on your side because the conversation only matters when the person has a reasonable voice that you need to listen to. When the industry is one that doesn't have much power. There's no reason to consult them because they have no check back against you. They ha... |
catch strikes that come out of nowhere because someone that now acts as a bridge between the state and the industry and an actor critically that represents both interests. That's the key to our case that you need someone in there who doesn't just represent the interests of the majority and everybody in the state, but ... |
</dpm> |
<dlo> |
A huge part of opening government's case relies on one sentence and one particular assertion, which is that currently in the status quo, these corporations are able to essentially have huge lobbying power on both sides of the House to promote certain politicians. So they need that veto power in order to balance the sca... |
you know what they care about, you know what they talk about, all of these particular things. So to that extent, it's very easy to create an internal narrative. Look guys, right now the company is, let's say pushing for more wages, but the labor union does not want to give you more wages because they care about, let's... |
like tell the teachers, oh my gosh, we want to push for more wages for you, but they want to reform the educational system in terms of other particular students, such as, for example, giving more funding in general for underprivileged schools compared to increasing more of the wages to actual people. Now, why are thes... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.