text stringlengths 0 9.69k |
|---|
Firstly, even if they do have employment in those areas, it's very often menial labor that pays incredibly low, also very often in the bay economy, which means you're not eligible for credit or collateral. If you want to have any form of vertical mobility, you often also don't learn transferable skills which you can pu... |
But thirdly, these areas are fundamentally under-invested in, which is to say the capital admiration and Naomi talks about is the least likely in those neighborhoods. There's a lack of infrastructure there, and we're talking about the basics; we're talking about sewage, we're talking about garbage removal, we're talkin... |
And then it takes a further step at the point where those neighborhoods become dilapidated. Yes, they are less developed, and they are more worn down than other neighborhoods. This creates a visual association with poverty and crime; it makes people even less likely to want to invest in those neighborhoods, which means... |
Before I explain why it becomes comparative on our side, something opening government doesn't do. I'll take opening opposition. |
<poi> |
Kids listen to what their parents tell them. Why do Indians and Muslims still hate each other years after partition? And even if biases decrease on your side, they don't, when people are now invading your community. |
</poi> |
Because of proximate experiences. If I'm a seven-year-old kid, I know my dad is angry at the news when watching them and stuff like this, but what they care about more is my friend who is proximate to me and who causes me positive emotions, as opposed to a narrative which tells me stories which I then see are not true ... |
What is the comparison? The comparison is that people now have incentives to access opportunities that exist, and they do NGOs that provide training and stuff like that, but they don't have those incentives when they are concentrated in those enclaves. But secondly, this is incredibly key: the state is now structurally... |
Only one position where it has to do this would also prove that they're more likely to integrate. The last thing: this is political representation. Four things here: first of all, it's marginal. Even if you get a single representative in the city council, he has very little political power against the entire council. P... |
Thirdly, minority representation in most of these countries is already constitutionally mandated for the very post-conflict reason. |
The opposition talks about lawmakers knowing that there's been a history of ethnic conflict. So they've included the mandatory representation of minorities into Parliament to prevent comfort in the future. This decision happens in Croatia, where we have a Serbian representative. But lastly, this point is uncomparative ... |
</mg> |
<mo> |
Starting in three, two, one. Closing opposition is going to be the first team that proves that xenophobia and racism are not a short-term transit problem, but something that structurally recognizes itself over and over, and it gets worse over time. |
Secondly, we're going to prove why you are significantly reducing the purchasing power and the length value that people in those communities get, which made them cope with the economic unfortunate realities that they lived in. This is going to directly pass the closing government on to the first extension. The CG respo... |
This is the only burden we have to prove why this is structurally true. Actual analysis, not intuition problems about historical examples, relative to our opening opposition. The first reason is that people have a natural inclination to be xenophobic. I want to headline this very carefully: not all people are racist; t... |
The second reason is simply political exogenous factors that exacerbate and take advantage of that natural inclination towards racism. There are two primary factors that happen. The first is the natural incentive of every political stage to form a national identity through patriotism and nationalism. In the vast majori... |
The second reason is that there are a lot of media and political incentives from demagogues and political leaders to actively reignite racial tensions and to use them as a political platform. Either A, you are already exploiting a natural psychological inclination of people, like fear-mongering for migrants, like using... |
If your policy is not based on products, those are reasons as to why racism does not go down in any way; it only goes up, which directly clashes through the characterization from opening government and closing government. I want to make this crucial contact theory work only if you are willing to charitably engage in co... |
This is the first extension. The second extension has to do purely with economic discrimination. The first premise is that, in many cases, the average wage of different ethnicities within countries is vastly different. This is just trivially true. The average wage for South African white men is $40,000; for a Black man... |
The second reason is that workplaces become ethnically equal chambers over the long term. This is why the most high-paying jobs in South Africa, within India, and within America are all dominated by the dominant ethnicity that is culturally homogeneous and is not willing to allow other people to enter. But thirdly, eve... |
Why is this crucial? Three reasons as to why those people are unable now to cope: they were previously able to cope within their communities economically and are now unable to do so. The first, which is that the costs of living are significantly going up, is because previously those communities were culturally homogene... |
The those, they were comparatively cheaper. Now, if you introduce other ethnicities that we have proven have much more purchasing power and are comparatively richer, this means that the prices for everyone are going up because you can hijack the prices to ensure profits from the rich minority and then force other peopl... |
<poi> |
When your weight goes up, you can isolate against marginal increases of discrimination. You take a cab; you put up a fan. Salary discrepancies decrease as perogy mechanisms; gentrification is symmetrical. It usually happens when they're not diverse. |
</poi> |
I generally don't understand this quite; I'm sorry, I don't understand a lot of passages. I didn't understand it. Secondly, property prices are going up in the status quo. There isn't the water of the month for you to live in culturally homogeneous communities of certain ethnicities that are low paid, meaning the price... |
To which people are buying properties in those particular regions, the overall bidding process and demand goes up. This is the same reason as to why, like Americans are currently outpriced by corporations that are willing to pay much more to buy out properties in their neighborhood that are previously established. On a... |
</mo> |
<gw> |
I reject this characterization coming from the opposition bench, that is actually quite insulting, that most people are racist inherently and that most people are inherently evil. I reject the characterization that just because my father fought Serbs in the Yugoslav War, I inherently have to hate Serbs because of all o... |
This is what we are uniquely bringing to you from closing government. This is what I'm going to mostly be focusing on in my speech. This is also the reason why we are extending over the opening government because the contact theory that Tin is talking about, which they reject, is an important clash very explicitly in D... |
I wanted to engage in this clash firstly, just a couple of like a intuitions and a couple of strategic observations. If the opposition bench is right, then progressivism is literally impossible. Yet we have seen historical changes. Yes, we have seen that Serbs and Croats are able to hang out together and live together ... |
But like, if you look historically, just because our, you know, like parents and like grandparents, just because like they were very, you know, like homophobic for example, but we are not because we were able to like interact with people who have different experiences from us. We are able to share some stories with the... |
There are a couple of structural reasons for this. Firstly, you don't want ethnic tensions; it's not convenient for you that within your state people are, you know, like killing each other and all these sorts of things. Secondly, there are trade, and these are kind countries that tend to be very often geographically pr... |
This is why, like, for example, the Serbian president has been donating money to Croatia and we had very good, how you say, relations and all these sorts of things. But thirdly, if this policy is done by a state and there is an obvious threat of backlash and violence and all these sorts of things, which is something th... |
Secondly, CO says that you need charitable engagement in order for, how you say, like our extension to work. You need charitable engagement amongst each other. Firstly, I already proved to you why this is possible. Most people aren't fucking racist and, like, this is like a biological argument about how you are scared ... |
Because of the capitalistic incentives, you are going to be employing them. Secondly, you also probably do care about, how you say, you also, like, children, for example, they're not discriminating. Like as a parent, you are going to, you know, have to have this, you know, like black child at home with you because they... |
<poi> |
You complain about the status quo, but you don't explain why they can get opportunities in new areas when they are poor and their deep-seated colonial other identities with anchoring effects. We explained before, CO, if economics is bad regardless, we get basic cultural protection from local level representation. |
</poi> |
So what we are explaining to you is that when you go to the city or something like this, you inherently, like, have to, you know, like, go to school there which is a better school. You inherently have to, how you say, like, get employed by someone who is, you know, like, who is there because, like, they need someone wh... |
But also when it comes to, like, the political representation and stuff like this, I think Tin deals with this already. Firstly, minorities tend to very often be protected by the Constitution and by the laws because you want to avoid ethnic tensions. But also secondly, because they do, how you say, because they are, yo... |
And then I do not, and I believe that India example that Naomi talks about is an isolated example given the fact that, like, right now they have conflicts over Kashmir. So this is not something that was just years ago; right now they have conflicts. This is why, like, Muslims and Indians, this is different. But also, I... |
But also secondly, we tell you that, like, they're going to be, how you say, like, building synagogues and all these sorts of things. So you are going to be able to have access to these sorts of things, and also, you are probably going to have people from your, how you say, like minority groups and all these sorts of t... |
</gw> |
<ow> |
Starting in three, two, one. Our case, the majority of it is not even dependent on us proving integration because it's highly questionable. We give you the reasons why it won't happen, but the crux of the case is not dependent on this. It's purely an economical fact that once you have people from different wealth group... |
Currently, shops and corporations have a profit incentive to maximize, to manipulate the price in different regions. This is to say certain neighborhoods get the same product for a cheaper price because people cannot afford it. Either way, when you have a mix of those groups in one place, you cater to the ones who are ... |
This does not depend on even if people are racist or not because it's just how the market works. This crucially makes people less able to protect themselves, to have to work three jobs, to have to literally be on the street or eat less because they can't afford the expensive food in the neighborhood. That's what our ca... |
If you think about it, neither team, but on the short diagonal, gives you structural reasons why people are likely to not be racist. The intuition pumping with the thousand examples, but the analysis there is not present. Then maybe gives you one piece of analysis to engage with later, but the response to our case is j... |
This thing, ah, the evolution argument has been this problem. This is one part out of our four mechanisms as to why people are getting more racist over time. They don't engage with our arguments and why nationalism exacerbates, um, uh, racism in a way that benefits politicians. They don't engage with the fact that pola... |
They don't engage with this, and they should come because this analysis predetermines everything in this debate. It determines whether a lot of integration could happen. It predetermines whether or not you can make use of those fancy schools and integration programs that they talk about. More structure, really though. ... |
Secondly, it's just too expensive. You have to build the building, you have to hire staff, you have to maintain it constantly, meaning the state has too high of a cost for a benefit that is not even certain. Integration is highly uncertain; you are not willing to do this. But lastly, you don't have a political gain to ... |
Now, secondly, on integration, one, they say, "Ah, but in the best case scenario, displaying the kids who are like not racist right now who integrate with other kids," but again, this is a certainty. Why? One, kids don't interact with one another constantly. This explains to you that your parents will literally not all... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.