Instruction
stringlengths
45
106
input_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
output_code
stringlengths
1
13.7k
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Lua to VB, same semantics.
collection = {0, '1'} print(collection[1]) collection = {["foo"] = 0, ["bar"] = '1'} print(collection["foo"]) print(collection.foo) collection = {0, '1', ["foo"] = 0, ["bar"] = '1'}
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Change the programming language of this snippet from Lua to Go without modifying what it does.
collection = {0, '1'} print(collection[1]) collection = {["foo"] = 0, ["bar"] = '1'} print(collection["foo"]) print(collection.foo) collection = {0, '1', ["foo"] = 0, ["bar"] = '1'}
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C instead of Mathematica, keeping it the same logically?
Lst = {3, 4, 5, 6} ->{3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 2] ->{2, 3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 1] ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Lst ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Insert[ Lst, X, 4] ->{1, 2, 3, X, 4, 5, 6}
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Mathematica to C#, same semantics.
Lst = {3, 4, 5, 6} ->{3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 2] ->{2, 3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 1] ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Lst ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Insert[ Lst, X, 4] ->{1, 2, 3, X, 4, 5, 6}
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Please provide an equivalent version of this Mathematica code in C++.
Lst = {3, 4, 5, 6} ->{3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 2] ->{2, 3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 1] ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Lst ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Insert[ Lst, X, 4] ->{1, 2, 3, X, 4, 5, 6}
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Mathematica to Java, same semantics.
Lst = {3, 4, 5, 6} ->{3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 2] ->{2, 3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 1] ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Lst ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Insert[ Lst, X, 4] ->{1, 2, 3, X, 4, 5, 6}
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Change the programming language of this snippet from Mathematica to Python without modifying what it does.
Lst = {3, 4, 5, 6} ->{3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 2] ->{2, 3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 1] ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Lst ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Insert[ Lst, X, 4] ->{1, 2, 3, X, 4, 5, 6}
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Convert this Mathematica block to VB, preserving its control flow and logic.
Lst = {3, 4, 5, 6} ->{3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 2] ->{2, 3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 1] ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Lst ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Insert[ Lst, X, 4] ->{1, 2, 3, X, 4, 5, 6}
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Write the same algorithm in Go as shown in this Mathematica implementation.
Lst = {3, 4, 5, 6} ->{3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 2] ->{2, 3, 4, 5, 6} PrependTo[ Lst, 1] ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Lst ->{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} Insert[ Lst, X, 4] ->{1, 2, 3, X, 4, 5, 6}
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Generate an equivalent C version of this MATLAB code.
>> A = {2,'TPS Report'} A = [2] 'TPS Report' >> A{2} = struct('make','honda','year',2003) A = [2] [1x1 struct] >> A{3} = {3,'HOVA'} A = [2] [1x1 struct] {1x2 cell} >> A{2} ans = make: 'honda' year: 2003
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Port the provided MATLAB code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
>> A = {2,'TPS Report'} A = [2] 'TPS Report' >> A{2} = struct('make','honda','year',2003) A = [2] [1x1 struct] >> A{3} = {3,'HOVA'} A = [2] [1x1 struct] {1x2 cell} >> A{2} ans = make: 'honda' year: 2003
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of MATLAB, keeping it the same logically?
>> A = {2,'TPS Report'} A = [2] 'TPS Report' >> A{2} = struct('make','honda','year',2003) A = [2] [1x1 struct] >> A{3} = {3,'HOVA'} A = [2] [1x1 struct] {1x2 cell} >> A{2} ans = make: 'honda' year: 2003
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Ensure the translated Java code behaves exactly like the original MATLAB snippet.
>> A = {2,'TPS Report'} A = [2] 'TPS Report' >> A{2} = struct('make','honda','year',2003) A = [2] [1x1 struct] >> A{3} = {3,'HOVA'} A = [2] [1x1 struct] {1x2 cell} >> A{2} ans = make: 'honda' year: 2003
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this MATLAB implementation.
>> A = {2,'TPS Report'} A = [2] 'TPS Report' >> A{2} = struct('make','honda','year',2003) A = [2] [1x1 struct] >> A{3} = {3,'HOVA'} A = [2] [1x1 struct] {1x2 cell} >> A{2} ans = make: 'honda' year: 2003
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Generate a VB translation of this MATLAB snippet without changing its computational steps.
>> A = {2,'TPS Report'} A = [2] 'TPS Report' >> A{2} = struct('make','honda','year',2003) A = [2] [1x1 struct] >> A{3} = {3,'HOVA'} A = [2] [1x1 struct] {1x2 cell} >> A{2} ans = make: 'honda' year: 2003
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Generate an equivalent Go version of this MATLAB code.
>> A = {2,'TPS Report'} A = [2] 'TPS Report' >> A{2} = struct('make','honda','year',2003) A = [2] [1x1 struct] >> A{3} = {3,'HOVA'} A = [2] [1x1 struct] {1x2 cell} >> A{2} ans = make: 'honda' year: 2003
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Port the provided Nim code into C while preserving the original functionality.
var a = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] var b: array[128, int] b[9] = 10 b[0..8] = a var c: array['a'..'d', float] = [1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3] c['b'] = 10000
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Port the provided Nim code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
var a = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] var b: array[128, int] b[9] = 10 b[0..8] = a var c: array['a'..'d', float] = [1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3] c['b'] = 10000
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Translate this program into C++ but keep the logic exactly as in Nim.
var a = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] var b: array[128, int] b[9] = 10 b[0..8] = a var c: array['a'..'d', float] = [1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3] c['b'] = 10000
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Port the provided Nim code into Java while preserving the original functionality.
var a = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] var b: array[128, int] b[9] = 10 b[0..8] = a var c: array['a'..'d', float] = [1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3] c['b'] = 10000
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Nim code.
var a = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] var b: array[128, int] b[9] = 10 b[0..8] = a var c: array['a'..'d', float] = [1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3] c['b'] = 10000
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in VB.
var a = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] var b: array[128, int] b[9] = 10 b[0..8] = a var c: array['a'..'d', float] = [1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3] c['b'] = 10000
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Nim to Go.
var a = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] var b: array[128, int] b[9] = 10 b[0..8] = a var c: array['a'..'d', float] = [1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3] c['b'] = 10000
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Write the same algorithm in C as shown in this OCaml implementation.
[1; 2; 3; 4; 5]
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Rewrite this program in C# while keeping its functionality equivalent to the OCaml version.
[1; 2; 3; 4; 5]
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Ensure the translated C++ code behaves exactly like the original OCaml snippet.
[1; 2; 3; 4; 5]
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Produce a functionally identical Java code for the snippet given in OCaml.
[1; 2; 3; 4; 5]
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Write a version of this OCaml function in Python with identical behavior.
[1; 2; 3; 4; 5]
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in OCaml.
[1; 2; 3; 4; 5]
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Port the provided Pascal code into C while preserving the original functionality.
var MyArray: array[1..5] of real; begin MyArray[1] := 4.35; end;
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Write a version of this Pascal function in C# with identical behavior.
var MyArray: array[1..5] of real; begin MyArray[1] := 4.35; end;
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C++.
var MyArray: array[1..5] of real; begin MyArray[1] := 4.35; end;
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Pascal to Java, same semantics.
var MyArray: array[1..5] of real; begin MyArray[1] := 4.35; end;
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Translate the given Pascal code snippet into Python without altering its behavior.
var MyArray: array[1..5] of real; begin MyArray[1] := 4.35; end;
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Ensure the translated VB code behaves exactly like the original Pascal snippet.
var MyArray: array[1..5] of real; begin MyArray[1] := 4.35; end;
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
var MyArray: array[1..5] of real; begin MyArray[1] := 4.35; end;
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Write the same algorithm in C as shown in this Perl implementation.
use strict; my @c = (); push @c, 10, 11, 12; push @c, 65; print join(" ",@c) . "\n"; my %h = (); $h{'one'} = 1; $h{'two'} = 2; foreach my $i ( keys %h ) { print $i . " -> " . $h{$i} . "\n"; }
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Write the same code in C# as shown below in Perl.
use strict; my @c = (); push @c, 10, 11, 12; push @c, 65; print join(" ",@c) . "\n"; my %h = (); $h{'one'} = 1; $h{'two'} = 2; foreach my $i ( keys %h ) { print $i . " -> " . $h{$i} . "\n"; }
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Perl to C++, same semantics.
use strict; my @c = (); push @c, 10, 11, 12; push @c, 65; print join(" ",@c) . "\n"; my %h = (); $h{'one'} = 1; $h{'two'} = 2; foreach my $i ( keys %h ) { print $i . " -> " . $h{$i} . "\n"; }
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Rewrite the snippet below in Java so it works the same as the original Perl code.
use strict; my @c = (); push @c, 10, 11, 12; push @c, 65; print join(" ",@c) . "\n"; my %h = (); $h{'one'} = 1; $h{'two'} = 2; foreach my $i ( keys %h ) { print $i . " -> " . $h{$i} . "\n"; }
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Write the same algorithm in Python as shown in this Perl implementation.
use strict; my @c = (); push @c, 10, 11, 12; push @c, 65; print join(" ",@c) . "\n"; my %h = (); $h{'one'} = 1; $h{'two'} = 2; foreach my $i ( keys %h ) { print $i . " -> " . $h{$i} . "\n"; }
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Rewrite this program in VB while keeping its functionality equivalent to the Perl version.
use strict; my @c = (); push @c, 10, 11, 12; push @c, 65; print join(" ",@c) . "\n"; my %h = (); $h{'one'} = 1; $h{'two'} = 2; foreach my $i ( keys %h ) { print $i . " -> " . $h{$i} . "\n"; }
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
use strict; my @c = (); push @c, 10, 11, 12; push @c, 65; print join(" ",@c) . "\n"; my %h = (); $h{'one'} = 1; $h{'two'} = 2; foreach my $i ( keys %h ) { print $i . " -> " . $h{$i} . "\n"; }
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Translate the given PowerShell code snippet into C without altering its behavior.
$array = "one", 2, "three", 4 $array = @("one", 2, "three", 4) $var1, $var2, $var3, $var4 = $array $array = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 $array = 0..7 [int[]] $stronglyTypedArray = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 $array = @() $array = @("one") $jaggedArray = @((11, 12, 13), (21, 22, 23), (31, 32, 33)) $jaggedArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 3 -Force $jaggedArray[1][1] $multiArray = New-Object -TypeName "System.Object[,]" -ArgumentList 6,6 for ($i = 0; $i -lt 6; $i++) { for ($j = 0; $j -lt 6; $j++) { $multiArray[$i,$j] = ($i + 1) * 10 + ($j + 1) } } $multiArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 6 -Force $multiArray[2,2]
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Port the provided PowerShell code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
$array = "one", 2, "three", 4 $array = @("one", 2, "three", 4) $var1, $var2, $var3, $var4 = $array $array = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 $array = 0..7 [int[]] $stronglyTypedArray = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 $array = @() $array = @("one") $jaggedArray = @((11, 12, 13), (21, 22, 23), (31, 32, 33)) $jaggedArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 3 -Force $jaggedArray[1][1] $multiArray = New-Object -TypeName "System.Object[,]" -ArgumentList 6,6 for ($i = 0; $i -lt 6; $i++) { for ($j = 0; $j -lt 6; $j++) { $multiArray[$i,$j] = ($i + 1) * 10 + ($j + 1) } } $multiArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 6 -Force $multiArray[2,2]
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Transform the following PowerShell implementation into C++, maintaining the same output and logic.
$array = "one", 2, "three", 4 $array = @("one", 2, "three", 4) $var1, $var2, $var3, $var4 = $array $array = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 $array = 0..7 [int[]] $stronglyTypedArray = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 $array = @() $array = @("one") $jaggedArray = @((11, 12, 13), (21, 22, 23), (31, 32, 33)) $jaggedArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 3 -Force $jaggedArray[1][1] $multiArray = New-Object -TypeName "System.Object[,]" -ArgumentList 6,6 for ($i = 0; $i -lt 6; $i++) { for ($j = 0; $j -lt 6; $j++) { $multiArray[$i,$j] = ($i + 1) * 10 + ($j + 1) } } $multiArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 6 -Force $multiArray[2,2]
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Java.
$array = "one", 2, "three", 4 $array = @("one", 2, "three", 4) $var1, $var2, $var3, $var4 = $array $array = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 $array = 0..7 [int[]] $stronglyTypedArray = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 $array = @() $array = @("one") $jaggedArray = @((11, 12, 13), (21, 22, 23), (31, 32, 33)) $jaggedArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 3 -Force $jaggedArray[1][1] $multiArray = New-Object -TypeName "System.Object[,]" -ArgumentList 6,6 for ($i = 0; $i -lt 6; $i++) { for ($j = 0; $j -lt 6; $j++) { $multiArray[$i,$j] = ($i + 1) * 10 + ($j + 1) } } $multiArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 6 -Force $multiArray[2,2]
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Write a version of this PowerShell function in Python with identical behavior.
$array = "one", 2, "three", 4 $array = @("one", 2, "three", 4) $var1, $var2, $var3, $var4 = $array $array = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 $array = 0..7 [int[]] $stronglyTypedArray = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 $array = @() $array = @("one") $jaggedArray = @((11, 12, 13), (21, 22, 23), (31, 32, 33)) $jaggedArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 3 -Force $jaggedArray[1][1] $multiArray = New-Object -TypeName "System.Object[,]" -ArgumentList 6,6 for ($i = 0; $i -lt 6; $i++) { for ($j = 0; $j -lt 6; $j++) { $multiArray[$i,$j] = ($i + 1) * 10 + ($j + 1) } } $multiArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 6 -Force $multiArray[2,2]
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Rewrite the snippet below in VB so it works the same as the original PowerShell code.
$array = "one", 2, "three", 4 $array = @("one", 2, "three", 4) $var1, $var2, $var3, $var4 = $array $array = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 $array = 0..7 [int[]] $stronglyTypedArray = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 $array = @() $array = @("one") $jaggedArray = @((11, 12, 13), (21, 22, 23), (31, 32, 33)) $jaggedArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 3 -Force $jaggedArray[1][1] $multiArray = New-Object -TypeName "System.Object[,]" -ArgumentList 6,6 for ($i = 0; $i -lt 6; $i++) { for ($j = 0; $j -lt 6; $j++) { $multiArray[$i,$j] = ($i + 1) * 10 + ($j + 1) } } $multiArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 6 -Force $multiArray[2,2]
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Translate the given PowerShell code snippet into Go without altering its behavior.
$array = "one", 2, "three", 4 $array = @("one", 2, "three", 4) $var1, $var2, $var3, $var4 = $array $array = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 $array = 0..7 [int[]] $stronglyTypedArray = 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 $array = @() $array = @("one") $jaggedArray = @((11, 12, 13), (21, 22, 23), (31, 32, 33)) $jaggedArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 3 -Force $jaggedArray[1][1] $multiArray = New-Object -TypeName "System.Object[,]" -ArgumentList 6,6 for ($i = 0; $i -lt 6; $i++) { for ($j = 0; $j -lt 6; $j++) { $multiArray[$i,$j] = ($i + 1) * 10 + ($j + 1) } } $multiArray | Format-Wide {$_} -Column 6 -Force $multiArray[2,2]
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C.
numeric(5) 1:10 c(1, 3, 6, 10, 7 + 8, sqrt(441))
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Port the provided R code into C# while preserving the original functionality.
numeric(5) 1:10 c(1, 3, 6, 10, 7 + 8, sqrt(441))
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Produce a functionally identical C++ code for the snippet given in R.
numeric(5) 1:10 c(1, 3, 6, 10, 7 + 8, sqrt(441))
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Port the following code from R to Java with equivalent syntax and logic.
numeric(5) 1:10 c(1, 3, 6, 10, 7 + 8, sqrt(441))
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Rewrite this program in Python while keeping its functionality equivalent to the R version.
numeric(5) 1:10 c(1, 3, 6, 10, 7 + 8, sqrt(441))
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Change the programming language of this snippet from R to VB without modifying what it does.
numeric(5) 1:10 c(1, 3, 6, 10, 7 + 8, sqrt(441))
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Produce a functionally identical Go code for the snippet given in R.
numeric(5) 1:10 c(1, 3, 6, 10, 7 + 8, sqrt(441))
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in C.
#lang racket (list 1 2 3 4) (make-list 100 0) (cons 1 (list 2 3 4))
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Write the same code in C# as shown below in Racket.
#lang racket (list 1 2 3 4) (make-list 100 0) (cons 1 (list 2 3 4))
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Write the same code in C++ as shown below in Racket.
#lang racket (list 1 2 3 4) (make-list 100 0) (cons 1 (list 2 3 4))
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Produce a functionally identical Java code for the snippet given in Racket.
#lang racket (list 1 2 3 4) (make-list 100 0) (cons 1 (list 2 3 4))
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Racket to Python, same semantics.
#lang racket (list 1 2 3 4) (make-list 100 0) (cons 1 (list 2 3 4))
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Write the same code in VB as shown below in Racket.
#lang racket (list 1 2 3 4) (make-list 100 0) (cons 1 (list 2 3 4))
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Convert this Racket snippet to Go and keep its semantics consistent.
#lang racket (list 1 2 3 4) (make-list 100 0) (cons 1 (list 2 3 4))
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Convert this COBOL block to C, preserving its control flow and logic.
identification division. program-id. collections. data division. working-storage section. 01 sample-table. 05 sample-record occurs 1 to 3 times depending on the-index. 10 sample-alpha pic x(4). 10 filler pic x value ":". 10 sample-number pic 9(4). 10 filler pic x value space. 77 the-index usage index. procedure division. collections-main. set the-index to 3 move 1234 to sample-number(1) move "abcd" to sample-alpha(1) move "test" to sample-alpha(2) move 6789 to sample-number(3) move "wxyz" to sample-alpha(3) display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(1): " sample-number(1) display "sample-record(2): " sample-record(2) display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) set the-index down by 1 display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) goback. end program collections.
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Can you help me rewrite this code in C# instead of COBOL, keeping it the same logically?
identification division. program-id. collections. data division. working-storage section. 01 sample-table. 05 sample-record occurs 1 to 3 times depending on the-index. 10 sample-alpha pic x(4). 10 filler pic x value ":". 10 sample-number pic 9(4). 10 filler pic x value space. 77 the-index usage index. procedure division. collections-main. set the-index to 3 move 1234 to sample-number(1) move "abcd" to sample-alpha(1) move "test" to sample-alpha(2) move 6789 to sample-number(3) move "wxyz" to sample-alpha(3) display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(1): " sample-number(1) display "sample-record(2): " sample-record(2) display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) set the-index down by 1 display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) goback. end program collections.
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Write a version of this COBOL function in C++ with identical behavior.
identification division. program-id. collections. data division. working-storage section. 01 sample-table. 05 sample-record occurs 1 to 3 times depending on the-index. 10 sample-alpha pic x(4). 10 filler pic x value ":". 10 sample-number pic 9(4). 10 filler pic x value space. 77 the-index usage index. procedure division. collections-main. set the-index to 3 move 1234 to sample-number(1) move "abcd" to sample-alpha(1) move "test" to sample-alpha(2) move 6789 to sample-number(3) move "wxyz" to sample-alpha(3) display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(1): " sample-number(1) display "sample-record(2): " sample-record(2) display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) set the-index down by 1 display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) goback. end program collections.
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Produce a functionally identical Java code for the snippet given in COBOL.
identification division. program-id. collections. data division. working-storage section. 01 sample-table. 05 sample-record occurs 1 to 3 times depending on the-index. 10 sample-alpha pic x(4). 10 filler pic x value ":". 10 sample-number pic 9(4). 10 filler pic x value space. 77 the-index usage index. procedure division. collections-main. set the-index to 3 move 1234 to sample-number(1) move "abcd" to sample-alpha(1) move "test" to sample-alpha(2) move 6789 to sample-number(3) move "wxyz" to sample-alpha(3) display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(1): " sample-number(1) display "sample-record(2): " sample-record(2) display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) set the-index down by 1 display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) goback. end program collections.
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Convert this COBOL block to Python, preserving its control flow and logic.
identification division. program-id. collections. data division. working-storage section. 01 sample-table. 05 sample-record occurs 1 to 3 times depending on the-index. 10 sample-alpha pic x(4). 10 filler pic x value ":". 10 sample-number pic 9(4). 10 filler pic x value space. 77 the-index usage index. procedure division. collections-main. set the-index to 3 move 1234 to sample-number(1) move "abcd" to sample-alpha(1) move "test" to sample-alpha(2) move 6789 to sample-number(3) move "wxyz" to sample-alpha(3) display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(1): " sample-number(1) display "sample-record(2): " sample-record(2) display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) set the-index down by 1 display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) goback. end program collections.
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Generate a VB translation of this COBOL snippet without changing its computational steps.
identification division. program-id. collections. data division. working-storage section. 01 sample-table. 05 sample-record occurs 1 to 3 times depending on the-index. 10 sample-alpha pic x(4). 10 filler pic x value ":". 10 sample-number pic 9(4). 10 filler pic x value space. 77 the-index usage index. procedure division. collections-main. set the-index to 3 move 1234 to sample-number(1) move "abcd" to sample-alpha(1) move "test" to sample-alpha(2) move 6789 to sample-number(3) move "wxyz" to sample-alpha(3) display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(1): " sample-number(1) display "sample-record(2): " sample-record(2) display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) set the-index down by 1 display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) goback. end program collections.
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
identification division. program-id. collections. data division. working-storage section. 01 sample-table. 05 sample-record occurs 1 to 3 times depending on the-index. 10 sample-alpha pic x(4). 10 filler pic x value ":". 10 sample-number pic 9(4). 10 filler pic x value space. 77 the-index usage index. procedure division. collections-main. set the-index to 3 move 1234 to sample-number(1) move "abcd" to sample-alpha(1) move "test" to sample-alpha(2) move 6789 to sample-number(3) move "wxyz" to sample-alpha(3) display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(1): " sample-number(1) display "sample-record(2): " sample-record(2) display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) set the-index down by 1 display "sample-table  : " sample-table display "sample-number(3): " sample-number(3) goback. end program collections.
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Produce a functionally identical C code for the snippet given in REXX.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols nobinary myVals = [ 'zero', 'one', 'two', 'three', 'four', 'five' ] mySet = Set mySet = HashSet() loop val over myVals mySet.add(val) end val loop val over mySet say val end val return
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Convert the following code from REXX to C#, ensuring the logic remains intact.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols nobinary myVals = [ 'zero', 'one', 'two', 'three', 'four', 'five' ] mySet = Set mySet = HashSet() loop val over myVals mySet.add(val) end val loop val over mySet say val end val return
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Rewrite this program in C++ while keeping its functionality equivalent to the REXX version.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols nobinary myVals = [ 'zero', 'one', 'two', 'three', 'four', 'five' ] mySet = Set mySet = HashSet() loop val over myVals mySet.add(val) end val loop val over mySet say val end val return
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in Java.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols nobinary myVals = [ 'zero', 'one', 'two', 'three', 'four', 'five' ] mySet = Set mySet = HashSet() loop val over myVals mySet.add(val) end val loop val over mySet say val end val return
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Convert this REXX snippet to Python and keep its semantics consistent.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols nobinary myVals = [ 'zero', 'one', 'two', 'three', 'four', 'five' ] mySet = Set mySet = HashSet() loop val over myVals mySet.add(val) end val loop val over mySet say val end val return
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in VB.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols nobinary myVals = [ 'zero', 'one', 'two', 'three', 'four', 'five' ] mySet = Set mySet = HashSet() loop val over myVals mySet.add(val) end val loop val over mySet say val end val return
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Please provide an equivalent version of this REXX code in Go.
options replace format comments java crossref symbols nobinary myVals = [ 'zero', 'one', 'two', 'three', 'four', 'five' ] mySet = Set mySet = HashSet() loop val over myVals mySet.add(val) end val loop val over mySet say val end val return
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Rewrite the snippet below in C so it works the same as the original Ruby code.
a = [] a[0] = 1 a[3] = "abc" a << 3.14 a = Array.new a = Array.new(3) a = Array.new(3, 0) a = Array.new(3){|i| i*2}
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Transform the following Ruby implementation into C#, maintaining the same output and logic.
a = [] a[0] = 1 a[3] = "abc" a << 3.14 a = Array.new a = Array.new(3) a = Array.new(3, 0) a = Array.new(3){|i| i*2}
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Port the provided Ruby code into C++ while preserving the original functionality.
a = [] a[0] = 1 a[3] = "abc" a << 3.14 a = Array.new a = Array.new(3) a = Array.new(3, 0) a = Array.new(3){|i| i*2}
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Ruby to Java.
a = [] a[0] = 1 a[3] = "abc" a << 3.14 a = Array.new a = Array.new(3) a = Array.new(3, 0) a = Array.new(3){|i| i*2}
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Generate an equivalent Python version of this Ruby code.
a = [] a[0] = 1 a[3] = "abc" a << 3.14 a = Array.new a = Array.new(3) a = Array.new(3, 0) a = Array.new(3){|i| i*2}
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Keep all operations the same but rewrite the snippet in VB.
a = [] a[0] = 1 a[3] = "abc" a << 3.14 a = Array.new a = Array.new(3) a = Array.new(3, 0) a = Array.new(3){|i| i*2}
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Convert the following code from Ruby to Go, ensuring the logic remains intact.
a = [] a[0] = 1 a[3] = "abc" a << 3.14 a = Array.new a = Array.new(3) a = Array.new(3, 0) a = Array.new(3){|i| i*2}
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Convert this Scala snippet to C and keep its semantics consistent.
import java.util.PriorityQueue fun main(args: Array<String>) { val ga = arrayOf(1, 2, 3) println(ga.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val da = doubleArrayOf(4.0, 5.0, 6.0) println(da.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val li = listOf<Byte>(7, 8, 9) println(li) val ml = mutableListOf<Short>() ml.add(10); ml.add(11); ml.add(12) println(ml) val hm = mapOf('a' to 97, 'b' to 98, 'c' to 99) println(hm) val mm = mutableMapOf<Char, Int>() mm.put('d', 100); mm.put('e', 101); mm.put('f', 102) println(mm) val se = setOf(1, 2, 3) println(se) val ms = mutableSetOf<Long>() ms.add(4L); ms.add(5L); ms.add(6L) println(ms) val pq = PriorityQueue<String>() pq.add("First"); pq.add("Second"); pq.add("Third") println(pq) }
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Convert this Scala snippet to C# and keep its semantics consistent.
import java.util.PriorityQueue fun main(args: Array<String>) { val ga = arrayOf(1, 2, 3) println(ga.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val da = doubleArrayOf(4.0, 5.0, 6.0) println(da.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val li = listOf<Byte>(7, 8, 9) println(li) val ml = mutableListOf<Short>() ml.add(10); ml.add(11); ml.add(12) println(ml) val hm = mapOf('a' to 97, 'b' to 98, 'c' to 99) println(hm) val mm = mutableMapOf<Char, Int>() mm.put('d', 100); mm.put('e', 101); mm.put('f', 102) println(mm) val se = setOf(1, 2, 3) println(se) val ms = mutableSetOf<Long>() ms.add(4L); ms.add(5L); ms.add(6L) println(ms) val pq = PriorityQueue<String>() pq.add("First"); pq.add("Second"); pq.add("Third") println(pq) }
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Transform the following Scala implementation into C++, maintaining the same output and logic.
import java.util.PriorityQueue fun main(args: Array<String>) { val ga = arrayOf(1, 2, 3) println(ga.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val da = doubleArrayOf(4.0, 5.0, 6.0) println(da.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val li = listOf<Byte>(7, 8, 9) println(li) val ml = mutableListOf<Short>() ml.add(10); ml.add(11); ml.add(12) println(ml) val hm = mapOf('a' to 97, 'b' to 98, 'c' to 99) println(hm) val mm = mutableMapOf<Char, Int>() mm.put('d', 100); mm.put('e', 101); mm.put('f', 102) println(mm) val se = setOf(1, 2, 3) println(se) val ms = mutableSetOf<Long>() ms.add(4L); ms.add(5L); ms.add(6L) println(ms) val pq = PriorityQueue<String>() pq.add("First"); pq.add("Second"); pq.add("Third") println(pq) }
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Scala to Java, same semantics.
import java.util.PriorityQueue fun main(args: Array<String>) { val ga = arrayOf(1, 2, 3) println(ga.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val da = doubleArrayOf(4.0, 5.0, 6.0) println(da.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val li = listOf<Byte>(7, 8, 9) println(li) val ml = mutableListOf<Short>() ml.add(10); ml.add(11); ml.add(12) println(ml) val hm = mapOf('a' to 97, 'b' to 98, 'c' to 99) println(hm) val mm = mutableMapOf<Char, Int>() mm.put('d', 100); mm.put('e', 101); mm.put('f', 102) println(mm) val se = setOf(1, 2, 3) println(se) val ms = mutableSetOf<Long>() ms.add(4L); ms.add(5L); ms.add(6L) println(ms) val pq = PriorityQueue<String>() pq.add("First"); pq.add("Second"); pq.add("Third") println(pq) }
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Convert the following code from Scala to Python, ensuring the logic remains intact.
import java.util.PriorityQueue fun main(args: Array<String>) { val ga = arrayOf(1, 2, 3) println(ga.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val da = doubleArrayOf(4.0, 5.0, 6.0) println(da.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val li = listOf<Byte>(7, 8, 9) println(li) val ml = mutableListOf<Short>() ml.add(10); ml.add(11); ml.add(12) println(ml) val hm = mapOf('a' to 97, 'b' to 98, 'c' to 99) println(hm) val mm = mutableMapOf<Char, Int>() mm.put('d', 100); mm.put('e', 101); mm.put('f', 102) println(mm) val se = setOf(1, 2, 3) println(se) val ms = mutableSetOf<Long>() ms.add(4L); ms.add(5L); ms.add(6L) println(ms) val pq = PriorityQueue<String>() pq.add("First"); pq.add("Second"); pq.add("Third") println(pq) }
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Transform the following Scala implementation into VB, maintaining the same output and logic.
import java.util.PriorityQueue fun main(args: Array<String>) { val ga = arrayOf(1, 2, 3) println(ga.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val da = doubleArrayOf(4.0, 5.0, 6.0) println(da.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val li = listOf<Byte>(7, 8, 9) println(li) val ml = mutableListOf<Short>() ml.add(10); ml.add(11); ml.add(12) println(ml) val hm = mapOf('a' to 97, 'b' to 98, 'c' to 99) println(hm) val mm = mutableMapOf<Char, Int>() mm.put('d', 100); mm.put('e', 101); mm.put('f', 102) println(mm) val se = setOf(1, 2, 3) println(se) val ms = mutableSetOf<Long>() ms.add(4L); ms.add(5L); ms.add(6L) println(ms) val pq = PriorityQueue<String>() pq.add("First"); pq.add("Second"); pq.add("Third") println(pq) }
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Maintain the same structure and functionality when rewriting this code in Go.
import java.util.PriorityQueue fun main(args: Array<String>) { val ga = arrayOf(1, 2, 3) println(ga.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val da = doubleArrayOf(4.0, 5.0, 6.0) println(da.joinToString(prefix = "[", postfix = "]")) val li = listOf<Byte>(7, 8, 9) println(li) val ml = mutableListOf<Short>() ml.add(10); ml.add(11); ml.add(12) println(ml) val hm = mapOf('a' to 97, 'b' to 98, 'c' to 99) println(hm) val mm = mutableMapOf<Char, Int>() mm.put('d', 100); mm.put('e', 101); mm.put('f', 102) println(mm) val se = setOf(1, 2, 3) println(se) val ms = mutableSetOf<Long>() ms.add(4L); ms.add(5L); ms.add(6L) println(ms) val pq = PriorityQueue<String>() pq.add("First"); pq.add("Second"); pq.add("Third") println(pq) }
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Tcl to C, same semantics.
set c [list] ; lappend c 10 11 13 set c [linsert $c 2 "twelve goes here"] foreach elem $c {puts $elem} proc show_size {l} { puts [llength $l] } show_size $c
#define cSize( a ) ( sizeof(a)/sizeof(a[0]) ) int ar[10]; ar[0] = 1; ar[1] = 2; int* p; for (p=ar; p<(ar+cSize(ar)); p++) { printf("%d\n",*p); }
Produce a functionally identical C# code for the snippet given in Tcl.
set c [list] ; lappend c 10 11 13 set c [linsert $c 2 "twelve goes here"] foreach elem $c {puts $elem} proc show_size {l} { puts [llength $l] } show_size $c
int[] intArray = new int[5] { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = new int[]{ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; int[] intArray = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }; string[] stringArr = new string[5]; stringArr[0] = "string";
Can you help me rewrite this code in C++ instead of Tcl, keeping it the same logically?
set c [list] ; lappend c 10 11 13 set c [linsert $c 2 "twelve goes here"] foreach elem $c {puts $elem} proc show_size {l} { puts [llength $l] } show_size $c
int a[5]; a[0] = 1; int primes[10] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 }; #include <string> std::string strings[4];
Preserve the algorithm and functionality while converting the code from Tcl to Java.
set c [list] ; lappend c 10 11 13 set c [linsert $c 2 "twelve goes here"] foreach elem $c {puts $elem} proc show_size {l} { puts [llength $l] } show_size $c
List arrayList = new ArrayList(); arrayList.add(new Integer(0)); arrayList.add(0); List<Integer> myarrlist = new ArrayList<Integer>(); int sum; for(int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { myarrlist.add(i); }
Produce a language-to-language conversion: from Tcl to Python, same semantics.
set c [list] ; lappend c 10 11 13 set c [linsert $c 2 "twelve goes here"] foreach elem $c {puts $elem} proc show_size {l} { puts [llength $l] } show_size $c
collection = [0, '1'] x = collection[0] collection.append(2) collection.insert(0, '-1') y = collection[0] collection.extend([2,'3']) collection += [2,'3'] collection[2:6] len(collection) collection = (0, 1) collection[:] collection[-4:-1] collection[::2] collection="some string" x = collection[::-1] collection[::2] == "some string"[::2] collection.__getitem__(slice(0,len(collection),2)) collection = {0: "zero", 1: "one"} collection['zero'] = 2 collection = set([0, '1'])
Please provide an equivalent version of this Tcl code in VB.
set c [list] ; lappend c 10 11 13 set c [linsert $c 2 "twelve goes here"] foreach elem $c {puts $elem} proc show_size {l} { puts [llength $l] } show_size $c
Dim coll As New Collection coll.Add "apple" coll.Add "banana"
Generate an equivalent Go version of this Tcl code.
set c [list] ; lappend c 10 11 13 set c [linsert $c 2 "twelve goes here"] foreach elem $c {puts $elem} proc show_size {l} { puts [llength $l] } show_size $c
package main import "fmt" func main() { var a []interface{} a = append(a, 3) a = append(a, "apples", "oranges") fmt.Println(a) }
Translate this program into PHP but keep the logic exactly as in Rust.
let a = [1u8,2,3,4,5]; let b = [0;256]
<?php $a = array(); # add elements "at the end" array_push($a, 55, 10, 20); print_r($a); # using an explicit key $a['one'] = 1; $a['two'] = 2; print_r($a); ?>