Split (1)

train · 1k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

original_problem stringlengths 162 931	original_solution stringclasses 6 values	augmented_problem stringlengths 281 1.35k	augmented_solution stringclasses 68 values	distractor_metadata dict
Statement: Task: Decide whether a perspective supports or undermines a claim. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons. Perspec...	undermine	Statement: Task: Decide whether a perspective supports or undermines a claim. Rule: If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons. Perspec...	undermine; empirical	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Adds an independent classification subtask (empirical vs. normative) fused into the same prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and answer both.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — re...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons. Perspective: Fair use isn't failsafe and can be used in direct contention against the original intent of the law. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose the best...	B	Problem: Statement: Claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons. Perspective: Fair use isn't failsafe and can be used in direct contention against the original intent of the law. Separately, suppose three co-authors jointly own a work and agree to share cop...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, small sub-problem (simple arithmetic about co-authors' share) is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate it from the main rhetorical inference task.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_incre...
Statement: Claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons. Perspective: Establishes a Clear Brightline in Favor of Data Freedom. Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with either support or undermine.	support	Statement: Claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons. Perspective: Establishes a Clear Brightline in Favor of Data Freedom. Does this perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with either support or undermine. As a separate, independent sub-quest...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-question about dataset licensing is fused into the original question, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the extra question influence the main judgment.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], ...
Statement: Claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons. Perspective: Creates an easy to understand outline in support of Data Freedom. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines	A	Statement: Claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons. Perspective: Creates an easy to understand outline in support of Data Freedom. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Options: (A) supports (B) undermines. Additionally, as...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the philosophical framing of 'Data Freedom') was fused into the main question, requiring the solver to separate and answer two tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_diffic...
Statement: Given the claim and perspective below, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons. Perspective: Provides the foundation which supports a rational set of ideas which foster an ide...	support	Statement: Given the claim and perspective below, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Individuals should be able to legally bypass copyright protection technologies for fair use reasons. Perspective: Provides the foundation which supports a rational set of ideas which foster an ide...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-question about the usage (normative vs descriptive) of the phrase 'Data Freedom' is fused into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate and answer two independent judgments.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Perspective: Expiring Tax Cuts Would Cause a Double Dip Recession. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine.	undermine	Problem: Statement: Claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Perspective: Expiring Tax Cuts Would Cause a Double Dip Recession. Auxiliary (unrelated) question: Determine whether the statement 'A recession is typically defined as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth.' is true or false. Decide whether the ...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, unrelated sub-question about the definition of a recession was fused into the prompt so the solver must separate and answer two different tasks (one of which should be ignored for the final single-word output).", "name": "Compositional und...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Perspective: double dip recessions are caused by expiring tax cuts	undermine	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Perspective: double dip recessions are caused by expiring tax cuts. Separately, consider this independent question: For the claim "Extend Bush tax cuts for...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (a second claim) is fused into the original prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and reason about each claim independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moder...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Perspective: to avoid a double dip recession do not let tax cuts expire Choose the best option. Solution: B	B	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Perspective: to avoid a double dip recession do not let tax cuts expire As a separate sub-task, independently classify whether the perspective sentence "to ...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent classification sub-task is fused into the original question, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks (support/undermine decision vs. sentence-type classification) and avoid conflating them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" ...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Perspective: Removing Tax Cuts Would Reduce the Deficit Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option (A-J): (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports and undermines (D) neutral (E) contradicts (F) unclear (G) p...	A	Problem: Statement: Claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Perspective: Removing Tax Cuts Would Reduce the Deficit. Separately, as an independent task, determine whether 37 divided by 5 leaves a remainder of 2 (answer that arithmetic question on its own; this is a separate sub-problem and should not affect your j...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (modulo check) is fused into the main textual entailment task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid conflating them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_incre...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine. Claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Perspective: you can reduce the deficit by removing tax cuts	support	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Respond with a single word: support or undermine. Claim: Remove Bush tax cuts for the wealthy. Perspective: you can reduce the deficit by removing tax cuts. (Separately — and unrelated to the classificat...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (divisibility check) was fused into the main classification task, requiring the solver to separate the unrelated subtask from the classification decision.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimate...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: 'The Spear' should have remained on public display. Perspective: Public Decency. Answer with either support or undermine.	undermine	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: 'The Spear' should have remained on public display. Perspective: Public Decency. Answer with either support or undermine. (Independent subtask: Separately evaluate the following pair — Claim B: 'T...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent second claim-perspective pair is fused into the prompt, requiring the solver to separate and reason about two pairs independently before producing the final answer for the original pair.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], ...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Neil Armstrong did actually walk on the Moon. Perspective: the USA had every incentive to lie. Answer with either support or undermine.	undermine	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Neil Armstrong did actually walk on the Moon. Perspective: the USA had every incentive to lie. Answer with either support or undermine. Separately, as an independent subtask (unrelated to the c...	undermine; yes	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, unrelated yes/no sub-problem (a simple math fact) was fused into the original task so the model must separate and solve two independent tasks.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "moderate ...
Statement: Claim: Neil Armstrong did actually walk on the Moon. Perspective: There are problems with the pictures. Question: Based only on the perspective given, does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Answer with a single word: support or undermine	undermine	Statement: Claim: Neil Armstrong did actually walk on the Moon. Perspective: There are problems with the pictures. As a separate, independent task, indicate whether the word "pictures" contains more consonants than vowels by answering 'yes' or 'no'. Question: Based only on the perspective given, does the perspective su...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (a short yes/no letter-count task) is fused into the prompt so the solver must separate the two tasks and not let the added subtask influence the main judgement.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_di...
Statement: Given the claim 'Neil Armstrong did actually walk on the Moon.' and the perspective 'there are issues with the pictures', determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	undermine	Statement: Given the claim 'Neil Armstrong did actually walk on the Moon.' and the perspective 'there are issues with the pictures', determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. As a separate, independent check (do not let it affect the main judgment), also decide whether the sentence 'The pictur...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent entailment sub-problem was fused into the original judgement task, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and avoid letting the subtask influence the main stance decision.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estima...
Statement: Claim: Neil Armstrong did actually walk on the Moon. Perspective: The pictures have issues. Based on the perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? (A) supports (B) undermines	B	Statement: Claim: Neil Armstrong did actually walk on the Moon. Perspective: The pictures have issues. Based on the perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? (A) supports (B) undermines Separately (independent sub-problem — do NOT use its result when answering the perspective question): Lighting: Some argue...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem about lighting/shadows was fused into the original prompt, requiring the solver to separate the two judgments and answer them independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Federal states are better able to protect their citizens. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim	A	Problem: Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Federal states are better able to protect their citizens. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim. Separate sub-problem (independent): Ev...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem about policy uniformity in unitary nations is fused into the original judgment task, requiring the solver to separate the two evaluations.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mo...
Statement: Given the following, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Citizens are better protected in federal states. Answer with either support or undermine.	support	Statement: Given the following, decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Citizens are better protected in federal states. As an unrelated subtask, indicate whether 15 is a prime number. Answer with either support or undermine.	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, unrelated sub-problem is fused into the main problem so the solver must separate the tasks and ignore the side-task when producing the required label.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "m...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Federal States often have persistent losers. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports and undermines (D) neither	B	Problem: Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Federal States often have persistent losers. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports and undermines (D) neither Separately, evaluate this ind...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, self-contained sub-question (a second supports/undermines decision) was fused into the original problem so the solver must separate and solve two similar tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_...
Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Losers abound in federal states. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option. (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim Solution: B	B	Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Losers abound in federal states. Separate sub-problem (independent): Consider the logical syllogism — 'Some A are B' and 'All B are C'. Does it follow that 'Some A are C'? Answer yes or no; this sub-problem is unrelated to the main judgment...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent logical sub-problem (a syllogism) is fused into the main question, requiring the solver to separate the tasks and avoid letting the added sub-problem influence the main judgment.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimat...
Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Being a federal state helps large states deal with divergent economic performance. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim	support	Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Being a federal state helps large states deal with divergent economic performance. As a separate, independent exercise, consider the sentence: "Each of the states have their own laws." Decide whether that sentence is grammatically correct or...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent grammaticality subtask is fused into the main political-evaluation question, forcing the solver to separate and solve two different problems (policy evaluation vs. grammar) instead of focusing solely on the perspective's relation to the claim.", ...
Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Federal United States are better off economically. Indicate whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	support	Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Federal United States are better off economically. Indicate whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separate task: Statement: Claim B: Decentralized education systems produce more varied curricula. Perspective B: States se...	Main task: support. Separate task: support.	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, related sub-problem (about decentralized education standards) is fused into the original problem so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_incr...
Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Federal governments often extend their powers and usurp local authority, especially if one or more federal units are disproportionately powerful. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option: (A) Supports ...	B	Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Federal governments often extend their powers and usurp local authority, especially if one or more federal units are disproportionately powerful. Side problem: In a federation of 10 states where one state contains 40% of the population and t...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem about population distribution is fused into the main political-evaluation question, forcing the solver to separate and solve two distinct tasks.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficul...
Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Federal states are economically stronger. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines	A	Statement: Claim: Federal States are better than unitary nations. Perspective: Federal states are economically stronger. Additional statement: Decentralized tax systems in federal states lead to lower income inequality than centralized tax systems. Decide whether this additional statement is True or False. Question: Do...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent True/False sub-problem about decentralized tax systems and inequality was fused into the original judgment task, forcing the solver to separate two distinct reasoning threads.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_...
Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Cannabis is a gateway drug. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one of the options (A) through (J).	B	Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Cannabis is a gateway drug. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one of the options (A) through (J). Additionally, in a separate and unrelated task, decide whether the following syllogism is valid: "All mammals are warm-bloo...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Fused an independent logical-syllogism sub-problem into the original judgment task so the solver must separate the two tasks and not conflate them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — increases...
Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: using cannabis leads to other drugs. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports and undermines (D) neither (E) insufficient information (F) ambiguous (G) irrelevant (H) ...	B	Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: using cannabis leads to other drugs. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) both supports and undermines (D) neither (E) insufficient information (F) ambiguous (G) irrelevant (H) ...	Main question: B (undermines). Separate syllogism: X (valid).	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent syllogistic reasoning question was fused into the original argumentative judgment, requiring the solver to separate and solve two distinct tasks.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderat...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: being involved with people who use cannabis exposes you to other drug use.	undermine	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: being involved with people who use cannabis exposes you to other drug use. Separately, and without letting it affect your main judgment about support or ...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as empirical vs. value judgment) is fused into the main task, forcing the solver to separate the two decisions and avoid conflating them.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Uncertainty over the effects of cannabis means it is best to be prudent. Question: Based on the perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option. (A) Support (B) Undermine (C) Both support and undermine (D) Neither support ...	B	Problem: Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Uncertainty over the effects of cannabis means it is best to be prudent. Separately, Statement: Claim: Legalisation would increase government tax revenue from cannabis sales. Perspective: Projections about tax revenue are uncertain because consumpti...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (a separate claim about tax revenue with its own perspective) is fused into the prompt, requiring the solver to separate the two claims and apply the correct perspective to the target claim.", "name": "Compositional understandin...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: before there is enough known about cannabis use it is wise to be careful Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option (A) through (J). (A) Directly supports legalization (B) Undermines the claim (argues ...	B	Problem: Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: before there is enough known about cannabis use it is wise to be careful Task: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Choose one option (A) through (J). (A) Directly supports legalization (B) Undermines the claim (argues ...	Main task: B Secondary subtask (word-count parity for the Perspective sentence): even	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent word-count parity subtask was fused into the original classification problem, requiring the solver to separate the two tasks and answer them independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase"...
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: People should be allowed to do whatever they want to their own bodies....	support	Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. If the perspective could possibly convince someone with a different view, it is supporting; otherwise it is undermining. Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: People should be allowed to do whatever they want to their own bodies....	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-question (about whether the same perspective would support legalizing alcohol and permitting extreme body modification) is fused into the original task, forcing the solver to separate the main judgment from the additional separate evaluation....
Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Cannabis is harmful. Question: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word: support or undermine	undermine	Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Cannabis is harmful. Side-task (independent): Classify the sentence "Cannabis use increases car accident risk" as an empirical claim or a normative claim. Question: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Answer with a single word:...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent classification sub-task (empirical vs. normative) is fused into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate and solve two tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moder...
Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: cannabis makes you lazy. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines (C) neither	B	Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: cannabis makes you lazy. Separately, evaluate this logical statement: If all A are B and all B are C, then all A are C. Is this valid? Answer yes or no. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports (B) undermines (C)...	B	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent logical subproblem (validity of a transitive implication) is fused into the main argument-evaluation task so the solver must separate and solve two distinct problems.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficult...
Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: smoking cannabis keeps you from focusing.	undermine	Statement: You are given a claim and a perspective. Decide whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Separately, and independently of that judgement, indicate whether the perspective is primarily an empirical claim about effects or a value judgment. Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: smok...	undermine	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (classify the perspective as empirical vs. value judgment) is fused into the original task so the solver must separate and answer the two parts independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_diffi...
Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Cannabis opens the mind in a positive and beneficial manner.	support	Statement: Determine whether the following perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Cannabis opens the mind in a positive and beneficial manner. Separately (as an independent sub-task), indicate whether the perspective's assertion is primarily an empirical/factual ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Fused an independent classification sub-problem (is the perspective empirical or normative?) into the main judgment task so the solver must separate and solve two tasks independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficu...
Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: using cannabis has more benefits than not using. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim Solution: A	A	Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: using cannabis has more benefits than not using. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim In the same set, separately evaluate this unrelated statement and do not let its answe...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, unrelated sub-problem (a simple arithmetic truth-check) is fused into the original problem so the solver must separate and solve two distinct tasks.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Mod...
Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: there are no negative side effects to the use of cannabis. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim.	support	Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: there are no negative side effects to the use of cannabis. Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. (Separate, unrelated annotation included in the same batch: also decide whether the arithmetic statement '12 is divisible by 3' is t...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-question was fused into the original judgement task so the solver must separate the two problems and answer the main task without being distracted by the unrelated subtask.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], ...
Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: If cannabis was legalized, it could be regulated. Based on the perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option.	A	Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: If cannabis was legalized, it could be regulated. Based on the perspective, does it support or undermine the claim? Choose the best option. Separate, independent exercise (answer this only for that exercise and do not let it change your evaluation of the mai...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-problem (about taxation and illicit markets) is fused into the main problem, forcing the solver to separate and solve two distinct evaluations without letting the second affect the first.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ...
Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: If legalized it can be monitored and taxed. Based on the claim and the perspective, does the perspective support, undermine, or neither/ambiguous regarding the claim? Choose one option: (A) supports the claim (B) undermines the claim (C) neither/ambiguous	A	Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: If legalized it can be monitored and taxed. (Unrelated subtask — to be considered separately: Claim: The city should ban single-use plastic bags. Perspective: Banning bags reduces litter in rivers.) Based on the claim and the perspective, does the perspective...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent, unrelated claim/perspective pair was inserted into the problem so the solver must separate and ignore the unrelated subtask when judging the original claim–perspective relation.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimat...
Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Legal weed is subject to laws and is safer. Respond with one word: support or undermine	support	Statement: Determine whether the perspective supports or undermines the claim. Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Legal weed is subject to laws and is safer. Additionally, as a separate sub-task (answer this independently), indicate whether this perspective implies increased tax revenue by answering yes ...	support	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent sub-question about implied tax revenue was fused into the main task, requiring the solver to separate the two inferences and answer the main claim evaluation independently.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_dif...
Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs, yet remain legal. Does the perspective support, undermine, or neither with respect to the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports (B) Undermines (C) Neither	A	Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Alcohol and tobacco are more harmful drugs, yet remain legal. Does the perspective support, undermine, or neither with respect to the claim? Choose one: (A) Supports (B) Undermines (C) Neither. Additionally, answer this unrelated short logic sub-question: Pre...	Main question: (A) Supports. The perspective points out that more harmful drugs (alcohol and tobacco) are legal, which supports the claim that cannabis should also be legal — it highlights an inconsistency that favors legalising cannabis. Unrelated logic sub-question: (F) Undetermined. From 'All apples are fruit' and '...	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "Fused an independent syllogistic logic sub-question into the original claim-evaluation task so the solver must separate and solve two unrelated problems.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], "estimated_difficulty_increase": "Moderate — the...
Problem: Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Other addictive substances are legal. Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the claim? Choose one option.	A	Problem: Statement: Claim: Cannabis should be legalised. Perspective: Other addictive substances are legal. Additionally, an unrelated survey reported that 70% of cannabis users also consume alcohol; if 200 cannabis users were surveyed, how many also used alcohol? Question: Does the perspective support or undermine the...	A	{ "distractor_types_used": [ { "description": "An independent arithmetic sub-problem (survey percentage calculation) is fused into the original reasoning task, forcing the solver to separate the numeric calculation from the argumentative judgement.", "name": "Compositional understanding" } ], ...