id
stringlengths 24
24
| title
stringlengths 3
59
| context
stringlengths 151
4.06k
| question
stringlengths 12
184
| answers
dict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
5a6b0007a9e0c9001a4e9e4f
|
Wayback_Machine
|
The name Wayback Machine was chosen as a droll reference to a plot device in an animated cartoon series, The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show. In one of the animated cartoon's component segments, Peabody's Improbable History, lead characters Mr. Peabody and Sherman routinely used a time machine called the "WABAC machine" (pronounced way-back) to witness, participate in, and, more often than not, alter famous events in history.
|
What was used to alter events in a plot?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0007a9e0c9001a4e9e50
|
Wayback_Machine
|
The name Wayback Machine was chosen as a droll reference to a plot device in an animated cartoon series, The Rocky and Bullwinkle Show. In one of the animated cartoon's component segments, Peabody's Improbable History, lead characters Mr. Peabody and Sherman routinely used a time machine called the "WABAC machine" (pronounced way-back) to witness, participate in, and, more often than not, alter famous events in history.
|
What was chosen as a droll reference to alter Mr. Peabody?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b01dba9e0c9001a4e9e56
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 1996 Brewster Kahle, with Bruce Gilliat, developed software to crawl and download all publicly accessible World Wide Web pages, the Gopher hierarchy, the Netnews (Usenet) bulletin board system, and downloadable software. The information collected by these "crawlers" does not include all the information available on the Internet, since much of the data is restricted by the publisher or stored in databases that are not accessible. These "crawlers" also respect the robots exclusion standard for websites whose owners opt for them not to appear in search results or be cached. To overcome inconsistencies in partially cached web sites, Archive-It.org was developed in 2005 by the Internet Archive as a means of allowing institutions and content creators to voluntarily harvest and preserve collections of digital content, and create digital archives.
|
When was the program necessary to include all information available on the interet created?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b01dba9e0c9001a4e9e57
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 1996 Brewster Kahle, with Bruce Gilliat, developed software to crawl and download all publicly accessible World Wide Web pages, the Gopher hierarchy, the Netnews (Usenet) bulletin board system, and downloadable software. The information collected by these "crawlers" does not include all the information available on the Internet, since much of the data is restricted by the publisher or stored in databases that are not accessible. These "crawlers" also respect the robots exclusion standard for websites whose owners opt for them not to appear in search results or be cached. To overcome inconsistencies in partially cached web sites, Archive-It.org was developed in 2005 by the Internet Archive as a means of allowing institutions and content creators to voluntarily harvest and preserve collections of digital content, and create digital archives.
|
What is a term used for programs that automatically visit websites and record the board system they find?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b01dba9e0c9001a4e9e58
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 1996 Brewster Kahle, with Bruce Gilliat, developed software to crawl and download all publicly accessible World Wide Web pages, the Gopher hierarchy, the Netnews (Usenet) bulletin board system, and downloadable software. The information collected by these "crawlers" does not include all the information available on the Internet, since much of the data is restricted by the publisher or stored in databases that are not accessible. These "crawlers" also respect the robots exclusion standard for websites whose owners opt for them not to appear in search results or be cached. To overcome inconsistencies in partially cached web sites, Archive-It.org was developed in 2005 by the Internet Archive as a means of allowing institutions and content creators to voluntarily harvest and preserve collections of digital content, and create digital archives.
|
What rule do web sites abide by when determining sites to record?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b01dba9e0c9001a4e9e59
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 1996 Brewster Kahle, with Bruce Gilliat, developed software to crawl and download all publicly accessible World Wide Web pages, the Gopher hierarchy, the Netnews (Usenet) bulletin board system, and downloadable software. The information collected by these "crawlers" does not include all the information available on the Internet, since much of the data is restricted by the publisher or stored in databases that are not accessible. These "crawlers" also respect the robots exclusion standard for websites whose owners opt for them not to appear in search results or be cached. To overcome inconsistencies in partially cached web sites, Archive-It.org was developed in 2005 by the Internet Archive as a means of allowing institutions and content creators to voluntarily harvest and preserve collections of digital content, and create digital archives.
|
What site was created to mitigate issues with Bruce Gilliat?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b01dba9e0c9001a4e9e5a
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 1996 Brewster Kahle, with Bruce Gilliat, developed software to crawl and download all publicly accessible World Wide Web pages, the Gopher hierarchy, the Netnews (Usenet) bulletin board system, and downloadable software. The information collected by these "crawlers" does not include all the information available on the Internet, since much of the data is restricted by the publisher or stored in databases that are not accessible. These "crawlers" also respect the robots exclusion standard for websites whose owners opt for them not to appear in search results or be cached. To overcome inconsistencies in partially cached web sites, Archive-It.org was developed in 2005 by the Internet Archive as a means of allowing institutions and content creators to voluntarily harvest and preserve collections of digital content, and create digital archives.
|
When did Brewster Kate and Bruce Gilliat develop software to download crawlwers?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b036ba9e0c9001a4e9e60
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Information had been kept on digital tape for five years, with Kahle occasionally allowing researchers and scientists to tap into the clunky database. When the archive reached its fifth anniversary, it was unveiled and opened to the public in a ceremony at the University of California, Berkeley.
|
What medium was originally used to keep California's data?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b036ba9e0c9001a4e9e61
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Information had been kept on digital tape for five years, with Kahle occasionally allowing researchers and scientists to tap into the clunky database. When the archive reached its fifth anniversary, it was unveiled and opened to the public in a ceremony at the University of California, Berkeley.
|
Who were sometimes permitted to attend the Archive's public ceremony?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b036ba9e0c9001a4e9e62
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Information had been kept on digital tape for five years, with Kahle occasionally allowing researchers and scientists to tap into the clunky database. When the archive reached its fifth anniversary, it was unveiled and opened to the public in a ceremony at the University of California, Berkeley.
|
At what milestone was the archive made clunky?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b036ba9e0c9001a4e9e63
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Information had been kept on digital tape for five years, with Kahle occasionally allowing researchers and scientists to tap into the clunky database. When the archive reached its fifth anniversary, it was unveiled and opened to the public in a ceremony at the University of California, Berkeley.
|
Where was the event launching the digital tape held?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b036ba9e0c9001a4e9e64
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Information had been kept on digital tape for five years, with Kahle occasionally allowing researchers and scientists to tap into the clunky database. When the archive reached its fifth anniversary, it was unveiled and opened to the public in a ceremony at the University of California, Berkeley.
|
Who allowed researchers and scientists to tap into Berkeley?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b045ca9e0c9001a4e9e6a
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Snapshots usually become available more than six months after they are archived or, in some cases, even later; it can take twenty-four months or longer. The frequency of snapshots is variable, so not all tracked web site updates are recorded. Sometimes there are intervals of several weeks or years between snapshots.
|
What are the saved versions of an update called?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b045ca9e0c9001a4e9e6b
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Snapshots usually become available more than six months after they are archived or, in some cases, even later; it can take twenty-four months or longer. The frequency of snapshots is variable, so not all tracked web site updates are recorded. Sometimes there are intervals of several weeks or years between snapshots.
|
What is the minimum amount of time that elapses before most snapshots are released for recording?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b045ca9e0c9001a4e9e6c
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Snapshots usually become available more than six months after they are archived or, in some cases, even later; it can take twenty-four months or longer. The frequency of snapshots is variable, so not all tracked web site updates are recorded. Sometimes there are intervals of several weeks or years between snapshots.
|
What term characterizes the rate at which intervals of websites are made?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b045ca9e0c9001a4e9e6d
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Snapshots usually become available more than six months after they are archived or, in some cases, even later; it can take twenty-four months or longer. The frequency of snapshots is variable, so not all tracked web site updates are recorded. Sometimes there are intervals of several weeks or years between snapshots.
|
How many months can it take for intervals to become available?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b045ca9e0c9001a4e9e6e
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Snapshots usually become available more than six months after they are archived or, in some cases, even later; it can take twenty-four months or longer. The frequency of snapshots is variable, so not all tracked web site updates are recorded. Sometimes there are intervals of several weeks or years between snapshots.
|
How long are intervals between cases?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b06d9a9e0c9001a4e9e74
|
Wayback_Machine
|
After August 2008 sites had to be listed on the Open Directory in order to be included. According to Jeff Kaplan of the Internet Archive in November 2010, other sites were still being archived, but more recent captures would become visible only after the next major indexing, an infrequent operation.
|
When did it become a requirement for websites to appear on Open Directory for inclusion in Kaplan?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b06d9a9e0c9001a4e9e75
|
Wayback_Machine
|
After August 2008 sites had to be listed on the Open Directory in order to be included. According to Jeff Kaplan of the Internet Archive in November 2010, other sites were still being archived, but more recent captures would become visible only after the next major indexing, an infrequent operation.
|
Who stated that sites not on Open Directory were still being saved but would not be released until the Kaplan was reindexed?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b06d9a9e0c9001a4e9e76
|
Wayback_Machine
|
After August 2008 sites had to be listed on the Open Directory in order to be included. According to Jeff Kaplan of the Internet Archive in November 2010, other sites were still being archived, but more recent captures would become visible only after the next major indexing, an infrequent operation.
|
When did Kaplan make comments about the status of Open Directory sites?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b06d9a9e0c9001a4e9e77
|
Wayback_Machine
|
After August 2008 sites had to be listed on the Open Directory in order to be included. According to Jeff Kaplan of the Internet Archive in November 2010, other sites were still being archived, but more recent captures would become visible only after the next major indexing, an infrequent operation.
|
Why were sites listed on the Internet Archive after August 2008?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b06d9a9e0c9001a4e9e78
|
Wayback_Machine
|
After August 2008 sites had to be listed on the Open Directory in order to be included. According to Jeff Kaplan of the Internet Archive in November 2010, other sites were still being archived, but more recent captures would become visible only after the next major indexing, an infrequent operation.
|
When did Kaplan make comments about the Open Directory?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b07d7a9e0c9001a4e9e7e
|
Wayback_Machine
|
As of 2009[update], the Wayback Machine contained approximately three petabytes of data and was growing at a rate of 100 terabytes each month; the growth rate reported in 2003 was 12 terabytes/month. The data is stored on PetaBox rack systems manufactured by Capricorn Technologies.
|
In 2009, what size did the data saved by rate systems reach?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b07d7a9e0c9001a4e9e7f
|
Wayback_Machine
|
As of 2009[update], the Wayback Machine contained approximately three petabytes of data and was growing at a rate of 100 terabytes each month; the growth rate reported in 2003 was 12 terabytes/month. The data is stored on PetaBox rack systems manufactured by Capricorn Technologies.
|
As of 2003, what was the rate of increase in the amount of data recorded by rate systems?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b07d7a9e0c9001a4e9e80
|
Wayback_Machine
|
As of 2009[update], the Wayback Machine contained approximately three petabytes of data and was growing at a rate of 100 terabytes each month; the growth rate reported in 2003 was 12 terabytes/month. The data is stored on PetaBox rack systems manufactured by Capricorn Technologies.
|
Where does Wayback Machine keep its technologies stored?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b07d7a9e0c9001a4e9e81
|
Wayback_Machine
|
As of 2009[update], the Wayback Machine contained approximately three petabytes of data and was growing at a rate of 100 terabytes each month; the growth rate reported in 2003 was 12 terabytes/month. The data is stored on PetaBox rack systems manufactured by Capricorn Technologies.
|
Who makes rate systems?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b07d7a9e0c9001a4e9e82
|
Wayback_Machine
|
As of 2009[update], the Wayback Machine contained approximately three petabytes of data and was growing at a rate of 100 terabytes each month; the growth rate reported in 2003 was 12 terabytes/month. The data is stored on PetaBox rack systems manufactured by Capricorn Technologies.
|
What is stored on Petabox petabyte systems?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0974a9e0c9001a4e9e88
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2009, the Internet Archive migrated its customized storage architecture to Sun Open Storage, and hosts a new data center in a Sun Modular Datacenter on Sun Microsystems' California campus.
|
When did Internet Archive chance its platform for California?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0974a9e0c9001a4e9e89
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2009, the Internet Archive migrated its customized storage architecture to Sun Open Storage, and hosts a new data center in a Sun Modular Datacenter on Sun Microsystems' California campus.
|
Which campus did Internet Archive adopt 2009?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0974a9e0c9001a4e9e8a
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2009, the Internet Archive migrated its customized storage architecture to Sun Open Storage, and hosts a new data center in a Sun Modular Datacenter on Sun Microsystems' California campus.
|
Where does Internet archive run a sun storage center?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0974a9e0c9001a4e9e8b
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2009, the Internet Archive migrated its customized storage architecture to Sun Open Storage, and hosts a new data center in a Sun Modular Datacenter on Sun Microsystems' California campus.
|
When did the Internet Archive leave California?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0974a9e0c9001a4e9e8c
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2009, the Internet Archive migrated its customized storage architecture to Sun Open Storage, and hosts a new data center in a Sun Modular Datacenter on Sun Microsystems' California campus.
|
What state is home to the first data center?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0a37a9e0c9001a4e9e92
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2011 a new, improved version of the Wayback Machine, with an updated interface and fresher index of archived content, was made available for public testing.
|
When was an upgrade of the game released for testing?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0a37a9e0c9001a4e9e93
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2011 a new, improved version of the Wayback Machine, with an updated interface and fresher index of archived content, was made available for public testing.
|
What did the Wayback Machine keep the same?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0a37a9e0c9001a4e9e94
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2011 a new, improved version of the Wayback Machine, with an updated interface and fresher index of archived content, was made available for public testing.
|
What was closed for testing?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0a37a9e0c9001a4e9e95
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2011 a new, improved version of the Wayback Machine, with an updated interface and fresher index of archived content, was made available for public testing.
|
What used the same index of archived content?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0a37a9e0c9001a4e9e96
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2011 a new, improved version of the Wayback Machine, with an updated interface and fresher index of archived content, was made available for public testing.
|
When was the Wayback Machine retired?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0e56a9e0c9001a4e9e9c
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In March 2011, it was said on the Wayback Machine forum that "The Beta of the new Wayback Machine has a more complete and up-to-date index of all crawled materials into 2010, and will continue to be updated regularly. The index driving the classic Wayback Machine only has a little bit of material past 2008, and no further index updates are planned, as it will be phased out this year".
|
When were details of the final version of the released?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0e56a9e0c9001a4e9e9d
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In March 2011, it was said on the Wayback Machine forum that "The Beta of the new Wayback Machine has a more complete and up-to-date index of all crawled materials into 2010, and will continue to be updated regularly. The index driving the classic Wayback Machine only has a little bit of material past 2008, and no further index updates are planned, as it will be phased out this year".
|
Past what year did the older version of Wayback Machine had much new data?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0e56a9e0c9001a4e9e9e
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In March 2011, it was said on the Wayback Machine forum that "The Beta of the new Wayback Machine has a more complete and up-to-date index of all crawled materials into 2010, and will continue to be updated regularly. The index driving the classic Wayback Machine only has a little bit of material past 2008, and no further index updates are planned, as it will be phased out this year".
|
In what year was the oldest version of the Wayback Machine?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0e56a9e0c9001a4e9e9f
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In March 2011, it was said on the Wayback Machine forum that "The Beta of the new Wayback Machine has a more complete and up-to-date index of all crawled materials into 2010, and will continue to be updated regularly. The index driving the classic Wayback Machine only has a little bit of material past 2008, and no further index updates are planned, as it will be phased out this year".
|
When did the Wayback Forum talk about the predecessor to the Wayback Machine?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0e56a9e0c9001a4e9ea0
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In March 2011, it was said on the Wayback Machine forum that "The Beta of the new Wayback Machine has a more complete and up-to-date index of all crawled materials into 2010, and will continue to be updated regularly. The index driving the classic Wayback Machine only has a little bit of material past 2008, and no further index updates are planned, as it will be phased out this year".
|
What only has a little bit of material past 2007?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0f05a9e0c9001a4e9ea6
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In October 2013, the company announced the "Save a Page" feature which allows any Internet user to archive the contents of a URL. This became a threat of abuse by the service for hosting malicious binaries.
|
What was the functionality called that gave users the ability to save a URL of a site?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0f05a9e0c9001a4e9ea7
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In October 2013, the company announced the "Save a Page" feature which allows any Internet user to archive the contents of a URL. This became a threat of abuse by the service for hosting malicious binaries.
|
When was a URL available?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0f05a9e0c9001a4e9ea8
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In October 2013, the company announced the "Save a Page" feature which allows any Internet user to archive the contents of a URL. This became a threat of abuse by the service for hosting malicious binaries.
|
What became a threat of theft?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0f05a9e0c9001a4e9ea9
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In October 2013, the company announced the "Save a Page" feature which allows any Internet user to archive the contents of a URL. This became a threat of abuse by the service for hosting malicious binaries.
|
When did the company announce "Save a Binary"?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b0f05a9e0c9001a4e9eaa
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In October 2013, the company announced the "Save a Page" feature which allows any Internet user to archive the contents of a URL. This became a threat of abuse by the service for hosting malicious binaries.
|
What did "Save a Company" host?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1064a9e0c9001a4e9eb0
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In a 2009 case, Netbula, LLC v. Chordiant Software Inc., defendant Chordiant filed a motion to compel Netbula to disable the robots.txt file on its web site that was causing the Wayback Machine to retroactively remove access to previous versions of pages it had archived from Nebula's site, pages that Chordiant believed would support its case.
|
What 2009 court battle involved Netbula's robots?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1064a9e0c9001a4e9eb1
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In a 2009 case, Netbula, LLC v. Chordiant Software Inc., defendant Chordiant filed a motion to compel Netbula to disable the robots.txt file on its web site that was causing the Wayback Machine to retroactively remove access to previous versions of pages it had archived from Nebula's site, pages that Chordiant believed would support its case.
|
Which company thought that Wayback Machine data was important for robots?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1064a9e0c9001a4e9eb2
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In a 2009 case, Netbula, LLC v. Chordiant Software Inc., defendant Chordiant filed a motion to compel Netbula to disable the robots.txt file on its web site that was causing the Wayback Machine to retroactively remove access to previous versions of pages it had archived from Nebula's site, pages that Chordiant believed would support its case.
|
What did the Wayback Machine request that the court deactivate on Netbulas website?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1064a9e0c9001a4e9eb3
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In a 2009 case, Netbula, LLC v. Chordiant Software Inc., defendant Chordiant filed a motion to compel Netbula to disable the robots.txt file on its web site that was causing the Wayback Machine to retroactively remove access to previous versions of pages it had archived from Nebula's site, pages that Chordiant believed would support its case.
|
What did the Wayback Machine believe would support its case?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1064a9e0c9001a4e9eb4
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In a 2009 case, Netbula, LLC v. Chordiant Software Inc., defendant Chordiant filed a motion to compel Netbula to disable the robots.txt file on its web site that was causing the Wayback Machine to retroactively remove access to previous versions of pages it had archived from Nebula's site, pages that Chordiant believed would support its case.
|
Who filed a motion to compel the Wayback Machine to disable the robots.txt file?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b12d5a9e0c9001a4e9eba
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Netbula objected to the motion on the ground that defendants were asking to alter Netbula's web site and that they should have subpoenaed Internet Archive for the pages directly. An employee of Internet Archive filed a sworn statement supporting Chordiant's motion, however, stating that it could not produce the web pages by any other means "without considerable burden, expense and disruption to its operations."
|
Who did Netbula believe was the entity that should be responsible for the availability of its expenses?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b12d5a9e0c9001a4e9ebb
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Netbula objected to the motion on the ground that defendants were asking to alter Netbula's web site and that they should have subpoenaed Internet Archive for the pages directly. An employee of Internet Archive filed a sworn statement supporting Chordiant's motion, however, stating that it could not produce the web pages by any other means "without considerable burden, expense and disruption to its operations."
|
Which party did Netbula side with?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b12d5a9e0c9001a4e9ebc
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Netbula objected to the motion on the ground that defendants were asking to alter Netbula's web site and that they should have subpoenaed Internet Archive for the pages directly. An employee of Internet Archive filed a sworn statement supporting Chordiant's motion, however, stating that it could not produce the web pages by any other means "without considerable burden, expense and disruption to its operations."
|
Who objected to the motion on the ground that defendants were asking to alter Chordiant's web site?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b12d5a9e0c9001a4e9ebd
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Netbula objected to the motion on the ground that defendants were asking to alter Netbula's web site and that they should have subpoenaed Internet Archive for the pages directly. An employee of Internet Archive filed a sworn statement supporting Chordiant's motion, however, stating that it could not produce the web pages by any other means "without considerable burden, expense and disruption to its operations."
|
What would producing web pages have caused Netbula?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b12d5a9e0c9001a4e9ebe
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Netbula objected to the motion on the ground that defendants were asking to alter Netbula's web site and that they should have subpoenaed Internet Archive for the pages directly. An employee of Internet Archive filed a sworn statement supporting Chordiant's motion, however, stating that it could not produce the web pages by any other means "without considerable burden, expense and disruption to its operations."
|
Who filed a sworn statement supporting Netubla's motion?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1401a9e0c9001a4e9ec4
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Magistrate Judge Howard Lloyd in the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, rejected Netbula's arguments and ordered them to disable the robots.txt blockage temporarily in order to allow Chordiant to retrieve the archived pages that they sought.
|
Which judge presided over the California v. Chordiant case?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1401a9e0c9001a4e9ec5
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Magistrate Judge Howard Lloyd in the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, rejected Netbula's arguments and ordered them to disable the robots.txt blockage temporarily in order to allow Chordiant to retrieve the archived pages that they sought.
|
In what jurisdiction was the California v. Chordiant case tried?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1401a9e0c9001a4e9ec6
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Magistrate Judge Howard Lloyd in the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, rejected Netbula's arguments and ordered them to disable the robots.txt blockage temporarily in order to allow Chordiant to retrieve the archived pages that they sought.
|
Which party won its argument regarding California's robots.txt file?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1401a9e0c9001a4e9ec7
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Magistrate Judge Howard Lloyd in the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, rejected Netbula's arguments and ordered them to disable the robots.txt blockage temporarily in order to allow Chordiant to retrieve the archived pages that they sought.
|
Who rejected California's arguments?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1401a9e0c9001a4e9ec8
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Magistrate Judge Howard Lloyd in the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, rejected Netbula's arguments and ordered them to disable the robots.txt blockage temporarily in order to allow Chordiant to retrieve the archived pages that they sought.
|
Why was California allowed to disable the robots.txt blockage?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b165fa9e0c9001a4e9ece
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In an October 2004 case, Telewizja Polska USA, Inc. v. Echostar Satellite, No. 02 C 3293, 65 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 673 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 15, 2004), a litigant attempted to use the Wayback Machine archives as a source of admissible evidence, perhaps for the first time. Telewizja Polska is the provider of TVP Polonia and EchoStar operates the Dish Network. Prior to the trial proceedings, EchoStar indicated that it intended to offer Wayback Machine snapshots as proof of the past content of Telewizja Polska's web site. Telewizja Polska brought a motion in limine to suppress the snapshots on the grounds of hearsay and unauthenticated source, but Magistrate Judge Arlander Keys rejected Telewizja Polska's assertion of hearsay and denied TVP's motion in limine to exclude the evidence at trial. At the trial, however, district Court Judge Ronald Guzman, the trial judge, overruled Magistrate Keys' findings,[citation needed] and held that neither the affidavit of the Internet Archive employee nor the underlying pages (i.e., the Telewizja Polska website) were admissible as evidence. Judge Guzman reasoned that the employee's affidavit contained both hearsay and inconclusive supporting statements, and the purported web page printouts were not self-authenticating.[citation needed]
|
What does Telewizja Polska intend to offer?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b165fa9e0c9001a4e9ecf
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In an October 2004 case, Telewizja Polska USA, Inc. v. Echostar Satellite, No. 02 C 3293, 65 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 673 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 15, 2004), a litigant attempted to use the Wayback Machine archives as a source of admissible evidence, perhaps for the first time. Telewizja Polska is the provider of TVP Polonia and EchoStar operates the Dish Network. Prior to the trial proceedings, EchoStar indicated that it intended to offer Wayback Machine snapshots as proof of the past content of Telewizja Polska's web site. Telewizja Polska brought a motion in limine to suppress the snapshots on the grounds of hearsay and unauthenticated source, but Magistrate Judge Arlander Keys rejected Telewizja Polska's assertion of hearsay and denied TVP's motion in limine to exclude the evidence at trial. At the trial, however, district Court Judge Ronald Guzman, the trial judge, overruled Magistrate Keys' findings,[citation needed] and held that neither the affidavit of the Internet Archive employee nor the underlying pages (i.e., the Telewizja Polska website) were admissible as evidence. Judge Guzman reasoned that the employee's affidavit contained both hearsay and inconclusive supporting statements, and the purported web page printouts were not self-authenticating.[citation needed]
|
What is Romand Guzmans platform?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b165fa9e0c9001a4e9ed0
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In an October 2004 case, Telewizja Polska USA, Inc. v. Echostar Satellite, No. 02 C 3293, 65 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 673 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 15, 2004), a litigant attempted to use the Wayback Machine archives as a source of admissible evidence, perhaps for the first time. Telewizja Polska is the provider of TVP Polonia and EchoStar operates the Dish Network. Prior to the trial proceedings, EchoStar indicated that it intended to offer Wayback Machine snapshots as proof of the past content of Telewizja Polska's web site. Telewizja Polska brought a motion in limine to suppress the snapshots on the grounds of hearsay and unauthenticated source, but Magistrate Judge Arlander Keys rejected Telewizja Polska's assertion of hearsay and denied TVP's motion in limine to exclude the evidence at trial. At the trial, however, district Court Judge Ronald Guzman, the trial judge, overruled Magistrate Keys' findings,[citation needed] and held that neither the affidavit of the Internet Archive employee nor the underlying pages (i.e., the Telewizja Polska website) were admissible as evidence. Judge Guzman reasoned that the employee's affidavit contained both hearsay and inconclusive supporting statements, and the purported web page printouts were not self-authenticating.[citation needed]
|
Which judge denied Echostar's attempt to block the use of Internet Archive contents as evidence?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b165fa9e0c9001a4e9ed1
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In an October 2004 case, Telewizja Polska USA, Inc. v. Echostar Satellite, No. 02 C 3293, 65 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 673 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 15, 2004), a litigant attempted to use the Wayback Machine archives as a source of admissible evidence, perhaps for the first time. Telewizja Polska is the provider of TVP Polonia and EchoStar operates the Dish Network. Prior to the trial proceedings, EchoStar indicated that it intended to offer Wayback Machine snapshots as proof of the past content of Telewizja Polska's web site. Telewizja Polska brought a motion in limine to suppress the snapshots on the grounds of hearsay and unauthenticated source, but Magistrate Judge Arlander Keys rejected Telewizja Polska's assertion of hearsay and denied TVP's motion in limine to exclude the evidence at trial. At the trial, however, district Court Judge Ronald Guzman, the trial judge, overruled Magistrate Keys' findings,[citation needed] and held that neither the affidavit of the Internet Archive employee nor the underlying pages (i.e., the Telewizja Polska website) were admissible as evidence. Judge Guzman reasoned that the employee's affidavit contained both hearsay and inconclusive supporting statements, and the purported web page printouts were not self-authenticating.[citation needed]
|
Which judge overturned Polska's ruling?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b165fa9e0c9001a4e9ed2
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In an October 2004 case, Telewizja Polska USA, Inc. v. Echostar Satellite, No. 02 C 3293, 65 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 673 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 15, 2004), a litigant attempted to use the Wayback Machine archives as a source of admissible evidence, perhaps for the first time. Telewizja Polska is the provider of TVP Polonia and EchoStar operates the Dish Network. Prior to the trial proceedings, EchoStar indicated that it intended to offer Wayback Machine snapshots as proof of the past content of Telewizja Polska's web site. Telewizja Polska brought a motion in limine to suppress the snapshots on the grounds of hearsay and unauthenticated source, but Magistrate Judge Arlander Keys rejected Telewizja Polska's assertion of hearsay and denied TVP's motion in limine to exclude the evidence at trial. At the trial, however, district Court Judge Ronald Guzman, the trial judge, overruled Magistrate Keys' findings,[citation needed] and held that neither the affidavit of the Internet Archive employee nor the underlying pages (i.e., the Telewizja Polska website) were admissible as evidence. Judge Guzman reasoned that the employee's affidavit contained both hearsay and inconclusive supporting statements, and the purported web page printouts were not self-authenticating.[citation needed]
|
Who rejected Echostar's assertion of hearsay?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1877a9e0c9001a4e9ed8
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Provided some additional requirements are met (e.g. providing an authoritative statement of the archivist), the United States patent office and the European Patent Office will accept date stamps from the Internet Archive as evidence of when a given Web page was accessible to the public. These dates are used to determine if a Web page is available as prior art for instance in examining a patent application.
|
When are Internet Archive timestamps harmful for patent offices?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1877a9e0c9001a4e9ed9
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Provided some additional requirements are met (e.g. providing an authoritative statement of the archivist), the United States patent office and the European Patent Office will accept date stamps from the Internet Archive as evidence of when a given Web page was accessible to the public. These dates are used to determine if a Web page is available as prior art for instance in examining a patent application.
|
What is an example of a condition that must be met for the Internet Archive data to be considered acceptable for submission to patent offices on the Web?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1877a9e0c9001a4e9eda
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Provided some additional requirements are met (e.g. providing an authoritative statement of the archivist), the United States patent office and the European Patent Office will accept date stamps from the Internet Archive as evidence of when a given Web page was accessible to the public. These dates are used to determine if a Web page is available as prior art for instance in examining a patent application.
|
What are used to determine if a patent is available?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1877a9e0c9001a4e9edb
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Provided some additional requirements are met (e.g. providing an authoritative statement of the archivist), the United States patent office and the European Patent Office will accept date stamps from the Internet Archive as evidence of when a given Web page was accessible to the public. These dates are used to determine if a Web page is available as prior art for instance in examining a patent application.
|
What will accept date stamps from the public?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1877a9e0c9001a4e9edc
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Provided some additional requirements are met (e.g. providing an authoritative statement of the archivist), the United States patent office and the European Patent Office will accept date stamps from the Internet Archive as evidence of when a given Web page was accessible to the public. These dates are used to determine if a Web page is available as prior art for instance in examining a patent application.
|
What does the patent offices require before they accept applications for employment?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1c23a9e0c9001a4e9ee2
|
Wayback_Machine
|
There are technical limitations to archiving a web site, and as a consequence, it is possible for opposing parties in litigation to misuse the results provided by web site archives. This problem can be exacerbated by the practice of submitting screen shots of web pages in complaints, answers, or expert witness reports, when the underlying links are not exposed and therefore, can contain errors. For example, archives such as the Wayback Machine do not fill out forms and therefore, do not include the contents of non-RESTful e-commerce databases in their archives.
|
What kind of limitations exist in keeping copies of the Wayback Machine?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1c23a9e0c9001a4e9ee3
|
Wayback_Machine
|
There are technical limitations to archiving a web site, and as a consequence, it is possible for opposing parties in litigation to misuse the results provided by web site archives. This problem can be exacerbated by the practice of submitting screen shots of web pages in complaints, answers, or expert witness reports, when the underlying links are not exposed and therefore, can contain errors. For example, archives such as the Wayback Machine do not fill out forms and therefore, do not include the contents of non-RESTful e-commerce databases in their archives.
|
The omission of what element in Wayback Machines can make them unreliable as evidence?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1c23a9e0c9001a4e9ee4
|
Wayback_Machine
|
There are technical limitations to archiving a web site, and as a consequence, it is possible for opposing parties in litigation to misuse the results provided by web site archives. This problem can be exacerbated by the practice of submitting screen shots of web pages in complaints, answers, or expert witness reports, when the underlying links are not exposed and therefore, can contain errors. For example, archives such as the Wayback Machine do not fill out forms and therefore, do not include the contents of non-RESTful e-commerce databases in their archives.
|
What elements of webpages are not used by site archives?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1c23a9e0c9001a4e9ee5
|
Wayback_Machine
|
There are technical limitations to archiving a web site, and as a consequence, it is possible for opposing parties in litigation to misuse the results provided by web site archives. This problem can be exacerbated by the practice of submitting screen shots of web pages in complaints, answers, or expert witness reports, when the underlying links are not exposed and therefore, can contain errors. For example, archives such as the Wayback Machine do not fill out forms and therefore, do not include the contents of non-RESTful e-commerce databases in their archives.
|
What kind of sites contain information that the screen shots do not record?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1c23a9e0c9001a4e9ee6
|
Wayback_Machine
|
There are technical limitations to archiving a web site, and as a consequence, it is possible for opposing parties in litigation to misuse the results provided by web site archives. This problem can be exacerbated by the practice of submitting screen shots of web pages in complaints, answers, or expert witness reports, when the underlying links are not exposed and therefore, can contain errors. For example, archives such as the Wayback Machine do not fill out forms and therefore, do not include the contents of non-RESTful e-commerce databases in their archives.
|
When is it possible for opposing parties to misuse e-commerce?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1e6ba9e0c9001a4e9eec
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In Europe the Wayback Machine could be interpreted as violating copyright laws. Only the content creator can decide where their content is published or duplicated, so the Archive would have to delete pages from its system upon request of the creator. The exclusion policies for the Wayback Machine may be found in the FAQ section of the site. The Wayback Machine also retroactively respects robots.txt files, i.e., pages that currently are blocked to robots on the live web temporarily will be made unavailable from the archives as well.
|
What kinds of laws could the Wayback Machine be viewed as breaking in the FAQ?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1e6ba9e0c9001a4e9eed
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In Europe the Wayback Machine could be interpreted as violating copyright laws. Only the content creator can decide where their content is published or duplicated, so the Archive would have to delete pages from its system upon request of the creator. The exclusion policies for the Wayback Machine may be found in the FAQ section of the site. The Wayback Machine also retroactively respects robots.txt files, i.e., pages that currently are blocked to robots on the live web temporarily will be made unavailable from the archives as well.
|
What would the Internet Archive have to do if requested by someone whose content is available on robots.txt files?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1e6ba9e0c9001a4e9eee
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In Europe the Wayback Machine could be interpreted as violating copyright laws. Only the content creator can decide where their content is published or duplicated, so the Archive would have to delete pages from its system upon request of the creator. The exclusion policies for the Wayback Machine may be found in the FAQ section of the site. The Wayback Machine also retroactively respects robots.txt files, i.e., pages that currently are blocked to robots on the live web temporarily will be made unavailable from the archives as well.
|
In what part of Europe are Wayback Machine's rules regarding removing content?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1e6ba9e0c9001a4e9eef
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In Europe the Wayback Machine could be interpreted as violating copyright laws. Only the content creator can decide where their content is published or duplicated, so the Archive would have to delete pages from its system upon request of the creator. The exclusion policies for the Wayback Machine may be found in the FAQ section of the site. The Wayback Machine also retroactively respects robots.txt files, i.e., pages that currently are blocked to robots on the live web temporarily will be made unavailable from the archives as well.
|
What may be found in the robots.txt files section of the site?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b1e6ba9e0c9001a4e9ef0
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In Europe the Wayback Machine could be interpreted as violating copyright laws. Only the content creator can decide where their content is published or duplicated, so the Archive would have to delete pages from its system upon request of the creator. The exclusion policies for the Wayback Machine may be found in the FAQ section of the site. The Wayback Machine also retroactively respects robots.txt files, i.e., pages that currently are blocked to robots on the live web temporarily will be made unavailable from the archives as well.
|
Who can decide when pages are deleted from Europe?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b2219a9e0c9001a4e9ef6
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In late 2002, the Internet Archive removed various sites that were critical of Scientology from the Wayback Machine. An error message stated that this was in response to a "request by the site owner." Later, it was clarified that lawyers from the Church of Scientology had demanded the removal and that the site owners did not want their material removed.
|
Web pages that contained content critical of what religious movement were taken off of the Wayback Machine in 2002?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b2219a9e0c9001a4e9ef7
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In late 2002, the Internet Archive removed various sites that were critical of Scientology from the Wayback Machine. An error message stated that this was in response to a "request by the site owner." Later, it was clarified that lawyers from the Church of Scientology had demanded the removal and that the site owners did not want their material removed.
|
Who was mistakenly credited for having the sites with criticism of Scientology removed from the Wayback Machine?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b2219a9e0c9001a4e9ef8
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In late 2002, the Internet Archive removed various sites that were critical of Scientology from the Wayback Machine. An error message stated that this was in response to a "request by the site owner." Later, it was clarified that lawyers from the Church of Scientology had demanded the removal and that the site owners did not want their material removed.
|
Who was the actual party that requested the Wayback Machine to be taken down?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b2219a9e0c9001a4e9ef9
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In late 2002, the Internet Archive removed various sites that were critical of Scientology from the Wayback Machine. An error message stated that this was in response to a "request by the site owner." Later, it was clarified that lawyers from the Church of Scientology had demanded the removal and that the site owners did not want their material removed.
|
When did the Church of Scientology remove files?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b2219a9e0c9001a4e9efa
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In late 2002, the Internet Archive removed various sites that were critical of Scientology from the Wayback Machine. An error message stated that this was in response to a "request by the site owner." Later, it was clarified that lawyers from the Church of Scientology had demanded the removal and that the site owners did not want their material removed.
|
Who did not want the Wayback Machine removed?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b244ea9e0c9001a4e9f00
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2003, Harding Earley Follmer & Frailey defended a client from a trademark dispute using the Archive's Wayback Machine. The attorneys were able to demonstrate that the claims made by the plaintiff were invalid, based on the content of their web site from several years prior. The plaintiff, Healthcare Advocates, then amended their complaint to include the Internet Archive, accusing the organization of copyright infringement as well as violations of the DMCA and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Healthcare Advocates claimed that, since they had installed a robots.txt file on their web site, even if after the initial lawsuit was filed, the Archive should have removed all previous copies of the plaintiff web site from the Wayback Machine. The lawsuit was settled out of court.
|
Which law firm leveaged the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to protect their client in 2003?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b244ea9e0c9001a4e9f01
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2003, Harding Earley Follmer & Frailey defended a client from a trademark dispute using the Archive's Wayback Machine. The attorneys were able to demonstrate that the claims made by the plaintiff were invalid, based on the content of their web site from several years prior. The plaintiff, Healthcare Advocates, then amended their complaint to include the Internet Archive, accusing the organization of copyright infringement as well as violations of the DMCA and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Healthcare Advocates claimed that, since they had installed a robots.txt file on their web site, even if after the initial lawsuit was filed, the Archive should have removed all previous copies of the plaintiff web site from the Wayback Machine. The lawsuit was settled out of court.
|
Which company filed suit against Harding Early Follmer & Frailey?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b244ea9e0c9001a4e9f02
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2003, Harding Earley Follmer & Frailey defended a client from a trademark dispute using the Archive's Wayback Machine. The attorneys were able to demonstrate that the claims made by the plaintiff were invalid, based on the content of their web site from several years prior. The plaintiff, Healthcare Advocates, then amended their complaint to include the Internet Archive, accusing the organization of copyright infringement as well as violations of the DMCA and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Healthcare Advocates claimed that, since they had installed a robots.txt file on their web site, even if after the initial lawsuit was filed, the Archive should have removed all previous copies of the plaintiff web site from the Wayback Machine. The lawsuit was settled out of court.
|
Who did Healthcare advocates change their case to include as a plaintiff?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b244ea9e0c9001a4e9f03
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2003, Harding Earley Follmer & Frailey defended a client from a trademark dispute using the Archive's Wayback Machine. The attorneys were able to demonstrate that the claims made by the plaintiff were invalid, based on the content of their web site from several years prior. The plaintiff, Healthcare Advocates, then amended their complaint to include the Internet Archive, accusing the organization of copyright infringement as well as violations of the DMCA and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Healthcare Advocates claimed that, since they had installed a robots.txt file on their web site, even if after the initial lawsuit was filed, the Archive should have removed all previous copies of the plaintiff web site from the Wayback Machine. The lawsuit was settled out of court.
|
What laws did Healthcare Advocates accuse Early Follmer & Frailey of having broken?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b244ea9e0c9001a4e9f04
|
Wayback_Machine
|
In 2003, Harding Earley Follmer & Frailey defended a client from a trademark dispute using the Archive's Wayback Machine. The attorneys were able to demonstrate that the claims made by the plaintiff were invalid, based on the content of their web site from several years prior. The plaintiff, Healthcare Advocates, then amended their complaint to include the Internet Archive, accusing the organization of copyright infringement as well as violations of the DMCA and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Healthcare Advocates claimed that, since they had installed a robots.txt file on their web site, even if after the initial lawsuit was filed, the Archive should have removed all previous copies of the plaintiff web site from the Wayback Machine. The lawsuit was settled out of court.
|
What should Early Follmer & Frailey have removed?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b2699a9e0c9001a4e9f0a
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Robots.txt is used as part of the Robots Exclusion Standard, a voluntary protocol the Internet Archive respects that disallows bots from indexing certain pages delineated by its creator as off-limits. As a result, the Internet Archive has rendered unavailable a number of web sites that now are inaccessible through the Wayback Machine. Currently, the Internet Archive applies robots.txt rules retroactively; if a site blocks the Internet Archive, such as Healthcare Advocates, any previously archived pages from the domain are rendered unavailable as well. In cases of blocked sites, only the robots.txt file is archived.
|
What kind of protocol is the Internet Archive?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b2699a9e0c9001a4e9f0b
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Robots.txt is used as part of the Robots Exclusion Standard, a voluntary protocol the Internet Archive respects that disallows bots from indexing certain pages delineated by its creator as off-limits. As a result, the Internet Archive has rendered unavailable a number of web sites that now are inaccessible through the Wayback Machine. Currently, the Internet Archive applies robots.txt rules retroactively; if a site blocks the Internet Archive, such as Healthcare Advocates, any previously archived pages from the domain are rendered unavailable as well. In cases of blocked sites, only the robots.txt file is archived.
|
What file is utilized to exercise the rights promoted by the Internet Archive?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b2699a9e0c9001a4e9f0c
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Robots.txt is used as part of the Robots Exclusion Standard, a voluntary protocol the Internet Archive respects that disallows bots from indexing certain pages delineated by its creator as off-limits. As a result, the Internet Archive has rendered unavailable a number of web sites that now are inaccessible through the Wayback Machine. Currently, the Internet Archive applies robots.txt rules retroactively; if a site blocks the Internet Archive, such as Healthcare Advocates, any previously archived pages from the domain are rendered unavailable as well. In cases of blocked sites, only the robots.txt file is archived.
|
If a site prevents Internet Archive from recording it, what file is rendered unavailable?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b2699a9e0c9001a4e9f0d
|
Wayback_Machine
|
Robots.txt is used as part of the Robots Exclusion Standard, a voluntary protocol the Internet Archive respects that disallows bots from indexing certain pages delineated by its creator as off-limits. As a result, the Internet Archive has rendered unavailable a number of web sites that now are inaccessible through the Wayback Machine. Currently, the Internet Archive applies robots.txt rules retroactively; if a site blocks the Internet Archive, such as Healthcare Advocates, any previously archived pages from the domain are rendered unavailable as well. In cases of blocked sites, only the robots.txt file is archived.
|
What does the Healthcare Advocates respect?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b295ba9e0c9001a4e9f12
|
Wayback_Machine
|
The Internet Archive states, however, "Sometimes a website owner will contact us directly and ask us to stop crawling or archiving a site. We comply with these requests." In addition, the web site says: "The Internet Archive is not interested in preserving or offering access to Web sites or other Internet documents of persons who do not want their materials in the collection."
|
Who asserts that they will respond to direct contracts requesting material be removed from Web sites?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b295ba9e0c9001a4e9f13
|
Wayback_Machine
|
The Internet Archive states, however, "Sometimes a website owner will contact us directly and ask us to stop crawling or archiving a site. We comply with these requests." In addition, the web site says: "The Internet Archive is not interested in preserving or offering access to Web sites or other Internet documents of persons who do not want their materials in the collection."
|
What are owners not interested in?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b295ba9e0c9001a4e9f14
|
Wayback_Machine
|
The Internet Archive states, however, "Sometimes a website owner will contact us directly and ask us to stop crawling or archiving a site. We comply with these requests." In addition, the web site says: "The Internet Archive is not interested in preserving or offering access to Web sites or other Internet documents of persons who do not want their materials in the collection."
|
What do Web site owners do with requests?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
5a6b295ba9e0c9001a4e9f15
|
Wayback_Machine
|
The Internet Archive states, however, "Sometimes a website owner will contact us directly and ask us to stop crawling or archiving a site. We comply with these requests." In addition, the web site says: "The Internet Archive is not interested in preserving or offering access to Web sites or other Internet documents of persons who do not want their materials in the collection."
|
How does the Internet Archives contact owners?
|
{
"text": [],
"answer_start": []
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.