Split (1)

train · 116k rows

role stringclasses 2 values	content stringlengths 0 2.1k	session_id int64 10 21.7k	sequence_id int64 0 2.38k	annotations listlengths 0 8
volunteer	So would there be any limiting factors on the domain of this function?	17,015	25	[]
student	um	17,015	26	[]
student	yes	17,015	27	[]
student	wait	17,015	28	[]
student	yes	17,015	29	[]
volunteer	Yes?	17,015	30	[]
volunteer	Where would that be if any?	17,015	31	[]
student	oh	17,015	32	[]
student	domain no	17,015	33	[]
student	range yes	17,015	34	[]
volunteer	Good :)	17,015	35	[]
student	is this right?	17,015	36	[]
volunteer	Very good :) that looks absolutely correct	17,015	37	[]
volunteer	I see no flaws in any of your work, you seem to be very good at this	17,015	38	[]
student	thank you	17,015	39	[]
volunteer	Are you looking for any more help with the subject?	17,015	40	[]
student	yes	17,015	41	[]
volunteer	Ok, would you like a practice problem?	17,015	42	[]
volunteer	Oh I see there is more problems	17,015	43	[]
volunteer	So in the square root, what would the limiting factor be?	17,015	44	[]
volunteer	For question 3	17,015	45	[]
student	ok	17,015	46	[]
volunteer	Very good :)	17,015	47	[]
volunteer	Do you know what numbers would be the easiest to plug in?	17,015	48	[]
volunteer	Though you could plug in anything	17,015	49	[]
volunteer	That fits the domain	17,015	50	[]
volunteer	Very good :)	17,015	51	[]
volunteer	Those are the numbers I would have picked	17,015	52	[]
volunteer	And now we just look at question number 4	17,015	53	[]
volunteer	What would the limiting factor be there?	17,015	54	[]
volunteer	Very good :)	17,015	55	[]
volunteer	At X-2 can you tell me what type of discontinuity it is?	17,015	56	[]
student	hole	17,015	57	[]
volunteer	Close, because it’s in a denominator and it doesn’t cancel out at the top, it would actually be a vertical asymptote	17,015	58	[]
volunteer	Meaning as it gets closer to -2, it would go infinitely up as it approaches from the left, and then goes towards the negative when it comes from the right	17,015	59	[]
student	i feel like	17,015	60	[]
student	my drawing is inaccurate	17,015	61	[]
volunteer	Because as it grows closer to -2 like -1.999 then it would be 1 over a very small number, growing towards infinity	17,015	62	[]
volunteer	Yes, because it has a certical asymptote and not a hole, would you like me to demonstrate?	17,015	63	[]
volunteer	Vertical Asymptote*	17,015	64	[]
volunteer	Yes good :)	17,015	65	[]
volunteer	Oh wait a second	17,015	66	[]
volunteer	No yes you’re right my bad	17,015	67	[]
volunteer	Very good :)	17,015	68	[]
volunteer	I believe you have this concept down very well!	17,015	69	[]
volunteer	Is there anything else you are looking for help with?	17,015	70	[]
student	yes	17,015	71	[]
volunteer	Anything specific?	17,015	72	[]
volunteer	Ah I see	17,015	73	[]
volunteer	So would there be any restrictions on this problem?	17,015	74	[]
student	hmm	17,015	75	[]
student	nah	17,015	76	[]
volunteer	Good :)	17,015	77	[]
volunteer	That looks very good to me :)	17,015	78	[]
volunteer	Would number 4 have any limiting factors?	17,015	79	[]
volunteer	Sorry, 6	17,015	80	[]
student	um	17,015	81	[]
student	i dont think so	17,015	82	[]
volunteer	Good :)	17,015	83	[]
volunteer	Nothing in the denominators, no radicals, etc	17,015	84	[]
student	is this like lineary	17,015	85	[]
student	wait is this justl iner	17,015	86	[]
student	lol	17,015	87	[]
volunteer	Linear? Yes	17,015	88	[]
volunteer	Because no quadratics, nothing else etc :)	17,015	89	[]
volunteer	Very good :) everything seems right once more !	17,015	90	[]
volunteer	Any more problems ?	17,015	91	[]
student	yes	17,015	92	[]
volunteer	Alright :)	17,015	93	[]
volunteer	You seem to be doing a very good job so far!	17,015	94	[]
student	cause of ur great teaching	17,015	95	[]
volunteer	I don’t believe I’ve been helping at all, but thank you :)	17,015	96	[]
volunteer	It seems you’ve been having it down to a lock, I’ve just been here to be saying good job	17,015	97	[]
student	lol	17,015	98	[]
volunteer	Ok, I see what’s happening, you know what a parent function is?	17,015	99	[]
student	perhaps	17,015	100	[]
volunteer	Very good :)	17,015	101	[]
volunteer	Wait a minute	17,015	102	[]
volunteer	Would it be going to the left ?	17,015	103	[]
student	no	17,015	104	[]
volunteer	The 1st question	17,015	105	[]
volunteer	Good :)	17,015	106	[]
student	wait how do i say it	17,015	107	[]
student	that its -2x like longer	17,015	108	[]
volunteer	Well, the negative and the 2 would be 2 separate ones	17,015	109	[]
volunteer	If it’s negative it would be a reflection over the X axis	17,015	110	[]
volunteer	If it’s multiplied by 2, that would be a vertical stretch by 3	17,015	111	[]
volunteer	Sorry, by 2	17,015	112	[]
volunteer	Also don’t forget the reflection over the X axis for #3	17,015	113	[]
student	wdym	17,015	114	[]
volunteer	I’ll also say that it would just be 6 to the left, because we’re going direction we won’t need to give a sign	17,015	115	[]
volunteer	Because h(x) = -2 the negative in the front means that it’s a reflection over the X axis as a transformation	17,015	116	[]
student	um	17,015	117	[]
volunteer	Good :)	17,015	118	[]
student	is everything right?	17,015	119	[]
volunteer	And everything else looks good :)	17,015	120	[]
student	W	17,015	121	[]
volunteer	Do you need any help with these problems? You’ve been doing well so far :)	17,015	122	[]
student	wait	17,015	123	[]
student	um	17,015	124	[]

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.