text
stringlengths
1
160k
label
class label
20 classes
It has be reported that the National Baseball League has been spotted in the West Bank; they were recruiting pitchers. -- / .. / . /_______/_/__________/_/_/ _< /____/ /___ / .. /____/
17talk.politics.mideast
In article <C5w7zo.5xL@eskimo.com>, Steven Thornton writes: > In article <1993Apr21.130659.1@tesla.njit.edu> drm6640@tesla.njit.edu > writes: > Just watch me. Mattingly is a below average fielder. > Before you start up, yes, I have proof. There are really only two > adequate ways to measure fielding prowess. the first, which has the > advantage of being applicable to older players, since it uses raw data > available for almost all of MLB history, is the Total Chances per Game > method favored by the Total Baseball people among others. It basically > says that you measure a fielder by how many balls he gets to. But it is subject to all kinds of bias, and is almost completely useless for first basemen. From the raw stats, there is no way to tell which of a first baseman's putouts were made on throws from other fielders, and which were made on his own plays; likewise, you can't tell whether a double play was 6-4-3 or 3-6-3. Fielding Runs thus gives a first baseman no credit for putouts or double plays, only for assists and errors. It thus favors first basemen who play deep, reaching a lot of balls but forcing the pitcher to cover first more frequently. It also hurts first baseman who play behind left-handed pitching staffs and thus face few left-handed batters. > A better method, but newer and based ondata that has only been collected > over the last few years, measures the percentage of balls hit into the > part of the field the guy is responsible for. This is better; of course, it still isn't all of a first baseman's defense. > Some references: Mattingly's 1992 defensive rating, STATS method, from > Mike Gimbel's Baseball Player and Team Ratings: -1. Defensive Average, which uses larger (and probably better) zones, has Mattingly tied for second in the league. > On the other hand, he has contributed 233 runs by his batting > actions, a pretty healthy number. While 233 batting runs is good, it is mostly in the past; the runs he produced in 1986 don't say much about his value in 1993. -- David Grabiner, grabiner@zariski.harvard.edu "We are sorry, but the number you have dialed is imaginary." "Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again." Disclaimer: I speak for no one and no one speaks for me.
9rec.sport.baseball
I have manual transmission 5 speed. It difficult to engage gear. Does xmission oil change improve this situation? What do you think about the most favorable xmission oil change period? Youjip
7rec.autos
In article <1993Apr22.155542.12457@siemens.co.at>, mxcrew@mx2306.gud.siemens.co.at (The MX-Crew) wrote: > > Sorry for my stupid question :->, but what do you "americans" mean with > "shaft-drives". My dictionary knows only strange meanings like: > Schaft, Stiel, Pfeil, Strahl, Welle, Deichsel, Schacht. ------------ Shaft: Bamboozle, beat, beguile, burn (or flame), deceive, hoax, hoodwink. Drive: Campaign, crusade, push. So, 'shaft drive' may be a campaign to decieve or a crusade of beguile, efforts where are true to the spirit of this list. Wheel: revolution, swing Crusaders of beguile are innefective in revolutions and they cannot swing, either, therefore shaft drives cannot do wheelies. ==================================================== John Stafford Minnesota State University @ Winona All standard disclaimers apply.
8rec.motorcycles
>From: jhpb@sarto.budd-lake.nj.us (Joseph H. Buehler) >Many Catholics will decide to side with the Pope. There is some >soundness in this, because the Papacy is infallible, so eventually >some Pope *will* straighten all this out. But, on the other hand, >there is also unsoundness in this, in that, in the short term, the >Popes may indeed be wrong, and such Catholics are doing nothing to >help the situation by obeying them where they're wrong. In fact, if >the situation is grave enough, they sin in obeying him. At the very >least, they're wasting a great opportunity, because they are failing >to love Christ in a heroic way at the very time that He needs this >badly. Joe; Your logic excapes me. If the Papacy is infallible, and this is a matter of faith, then the Pope cannot "be wrong!" If, on the other hand, this is not a matter of faith, but a matter of Church law, then we should still obey as the Pope is the legal head of the church. In other words, given the doctrine of infallibility, we have no choice but to obey. Bob -- ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> \|/ <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< Bob Van Cleef Peace -0- be revc@garg.Campbell.CA.US The Land of Garg BBS unto /|\ you BBS (408) 378-5108 ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> | <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< [You might want to look at the FAQ on infallibility. The doctrine on infallibility does not say that the pope is always right. All Catholic theologians acknowledge that there have been a number of occasions when the pope was wrong. There appear to be two aspects to infallibility. One is a general concept that in the long run the Church is protected from serious error. However this does not mean that it's impossible for it to take wrong turns at one time or another. The more specific concept of papal infallibility is that in very specific circumstances a papal statement can be known to be infallible. However a relatively small fraction of statements meet those criteria. This does not absolve Catholics from the duty to obey even "ordinary" teachings of the pope. However only a few teachings are made in a way that is explicitly infallible. --clh]
15soc.religion.christian
In article <Apr.16.23.18.07.1993.1879@geneva.rutgers.edu> phs431d@vaxc.cc.monash.edu.au writes: >But what if the geologists are wrong and these people are warning of a >non-existent danger? Analogies can only push an argument so far (on both >sides). Both Melinda's and yours assume the premises used to set up your >respective analogies are true and thus the correct conclusion will arise. > >The important point to note is the different directions both sides come from. >Christians believe they know the TRUTH and thus believe they have the right >(and duty) to tell the TRUTH to all. > >Christians can get offended if others do not believe (what is self-evidently >to them) the TRUTH. Non-christians do not believe this is the TRUTH and get >offended at them because they (christians) claim to know the TRUTH. The analogy does not depend on the premisses being true, because the question under discussion is not truth but arrogance. A similar analogy might be a medical doctor who believes that a blood transfusion is necessary to save the life of a child whose parents are Jehovah's Witnesses and so have conscientious objections to blood transfusion. The doctor's efforts to persuade them to agree to a blood transfusion could be perceived to be arrogant in precisely the same way as Christians could be perceived to be arrogant. The truth or otherwise of the belief that a blood transfusion is necessary to save the life of the child is irrelevant here. What matters is that the doctor BELIEVES it to be true, and could be seen to be trying to foce his beliefs on the parents, and this could well be perceived as arrogance. ============================================================ Steve Hayes, Department of Missiology & Editorial Department Univ. of South Africa, P.O. Box 392, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa Internet: hayesstw@risc1.unisa.ac.za Fidonet: 5:7101/20 steve.hayes@p5.f22.n7101.z5.fidonet.org FAQ: Missiology is the study of Christian mission and is part of the Faculty of Theology at Unisa
15soc.religion.christian
In article <1993Apr14.184448.2331@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu> jrm@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu writes: >Firearms tend to fall into this low dollar/pound area. Why? Either the numerator or the denominator could fluctuate. The dollar value of a gun would (of course) go up if supply were restricted. The weight of a gun might go down significantly as technology improved. I don't think you have a basis to assert this. >It would not be economic to smuggle them in. All production >would have to be local. There are not all that many people >who have both the skill AND motivation to assemble worthwhile >firearms from scratch. The skill is easily taught to anyone with a modicum of mechanical aptitude and the ONLY motivator needed is money. If guns were banned then this motivator would kick in big time. Now, of course, it is not a moneymaking proposition for every machine shop to make guns on the side when it ain't rebuilding engines. Ban guns and watch what happens. You'll have to schedule a year in advance to get your brakes resurfaced. ;-)
16talk.politics.guns
In article <1993Apr21.172806.679@megatek.com> tims@megatek.com writes: >> Let us not limit >> 'misc.taoism' to 'philosophy'. > >But if we don't limit it to *something*, the discussion degenerates into >a big amorphous glob. Hmm...are you a Taoist? Imposing limits *does* do something useful...it gives you something to go beyond. >It seems to me that these questions more properly fall into the >category of "general metaphysics". I would prefer any misc.taoism >to deal more closely with topics and works more closely associated >with at least "semi-orthodox" Taoism: with established classic works >definitely included and works like Mantak Chia's argued about! I tend to be a bit critical of any stratification of Taoism. I especially tend to frown on any suggestion that "orthodoxy" or "classics" have any special place in Tao. >I think "neo-Taoism" should be excluded or get its own group (what I >mean by this is "Humpty-Dumpty Taoism", in which Taoism means whatever >a poster says it means.) This "alt.taoism" could also be a refuge >for debates about what "Taoism *REALLY* means" or speculations on sexual >alchemy, etc.. So rather than debate what "Taoism *REALLY* means" you are suggesting that we take someone else's word for it and work thusly? I'd rather not, thank you. >What's happening is that that the term "Taoism" is becoming >completely polluted and trivialized like the words "magic", "Alchemy", >"Zen," etc., by writers appropriating the word to mean whatever they >want. This is seen by the spate of new age books entitled "The >Tao of" this, that, and everything else. Whereas you, of course, have a clear idea of what the word means? Can you tell the Tao? :-) >Any other comments/ideas? I look forward to seeing them. On balance, >I say let misc.taoism rip and let the chips fall where they may. Wonderful idea. >it just gets filled up with college freshmen asking about the >Tao of Sex then it will have been a failure and people will post to >these groups just as they do now. Only if you choose to define failure in that way. Or to define it at all. -- I believe in the flesh and the appetites, Seeing hearing and feeling are miracles, and each part and tag of me is a miracle. -- Walt Whitman
19talk.religion.misc
Wasn't it Tricky Dick who issued stern warnings to Bush & Clinton not to 'Lose Russia'? (a la 'Who lost China?')
18talk.politics.misc
In article <Apr.20.03.02.26.1993.3803@geneva.rutgers.edu> clh writes: >Re: Are you Christian or Pauline? >Both. Sure, why not? But, are you using Paul to correct the words of Jesus? >There is no doubt in my mind about what is sin and what is >not, at least not in this case. Jesus did not deal explicitly with >the question of whether the Law was binding on Gentiles. "So *anyone* who dissolves even one of the smallest commands and teaches others the same way, will be known as the lowest in the kingdom of the skies; whereas *anyone* who keeps the commands and teaches them too, will be known as *someone* great in the kingdom of the skies." Mat5:19 (Gaus) Are you an "anyone" or are you a "no one?" Why not assume, that since Jesus didn't say that his words apply only to Jews, that they apply to all human beings, irregardless of race or sex? Why not assume, that even though Jesus did not mention your name, still Jesus was talking directly to you? >That's why I >have to cite evidence such as the way Jesus dealt with the Centurion. >As to general Jewish views on this, I am dependent largely on studies >of Pauline theology, one by H.J. Schoeps, and one whose author I can't >come up with at the moment. Both authors are Jews. Also, various >Christian and non-Christian Jews have discussed the issue here and in >other newsgroups. >Mat 5:19 is clear that the Law is still valid. It does not say that >it applies to Gentiles. Does it say that it applies to *you*? Are you anyone or no one? >And yes, I say that the specific requirement for worship on the >Sabbath in the Ten Commandments is a ceremonial detail, when you're >looking at the obligations of Gentiles. Ex20:8-11(JPS) Remember the sabbath day and keep it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a sabbath of the LORD your God; you shall not do any work - you, your son or daughter, your male or female slave, or your cattle, or the stranger who is within your settlements. For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth and sea, and all that is in them, and He rested on the seventh day; therefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day and hollowed it. Note: There is no specific requirement for worship here, however I for one would not be so bold as to call these verses a "ceremonial detail." >Similarly circumcision. Don't many Christians still practice circumcision? >I'm not sure quite what else I can say on this subject. Again, it's >unfortunate the Jesus didn't answer the question directly. It's unfortunate that Jesus didn't use your name directly, or maybe Jesus did? Are you somebody or nobody? >However we >do know (1) what the 1st Cent. Jewish approach was, (2) how Jesus >dealt with at least one Gentile, and (3) how Jesus' disciples dealt >with the issue when it became more acute (I'm referring to Acts 15 >more than Paul). Given that these are all in agreement, I don't see >that there's a big problem. If you don't see a problem, then perhaps there is none. As Paul closes Romans 14 (Gaus): In short, pursue the ends of peace and of building each other up. Don't let dietary considerations undo the work of God. Everything may be clean, but it's evil for the person who eats it in an offensive spirit. Better not to eat the meat or drink the wine or whatever else your brother is offended by. As for the faith that you have, keep that between yourself and God. The person is in luck who doesn't condemn himself for what he samples. On the other hand, the person with doubts about something who eats it anyway is guilty, because he isn't acting on his faith, and any failure to act on faith is a sin. [As far as I know, Christians (except specific Jewish Christian groups, and maybe some of the sabbatarians -- both of which are very small groups) do not practice circumcision on religious grounds. In some countries it has been done for supposed health reasons, but I've not heard it argued that it is being done because of the Biblical commandment. --clh]
15soc.religion.christian
> >Actually, now we have established that I don't believe what you believe, as >well as why I don't believe it. And if it's boring, then I yield the last >word to you, if you want it. You may say anything you like with >impunity--I am dropping the subject. > >--John L. Scott How very kind of you!
16talk.politics.guns
In article <jschwimmer.123.735362184@wccnet.wcc.wesleyan.edu> jschwimmer@wccnet.wcc.wesleyan.edu (Josh Schwimmer) writes: Any opinions on Burzynski's antineoplastons or information about the current status of his research would be appreciated. Burzynski's work is not too promising. None of his A-1 through A-5 antineoplastons have been shown to have antineoplastic effects against experimental cancer. The NCI conducted tests of A-2 and A-5 against leukemia in mice, with the result that doses high enough to produce toxic effects in the mice were not effective in inhibiting the growth of the tumor or killing it. (These were in 1983 and 1985) Burzynski claims that A-10 is the active factor common to all of A-1 and A-5 (something which he has not shown, A-10 has only been extracted from A-2. He also hasn't shown that A-1 through A-5 are actually distinct substances). The NCI conducted a series of tests using A-10 against a standard panel of tumors that included different cell lines from tumors in the following classes: leukemia, non-small-cell and small-cell lung cancer, colon cancer, cancer of the central nervous system, melanoma, ovarian cancer and renal cancer. A-10 exhibited neither growth inhibition nor cytotoxicity at the dose levels tested. It is necessary to process A-10 since it is not soluble (Burzynski's theory requires soluble agents), but this basically hydrolizes it to PAG (which he calls AS 2.5). PAG is not an information carrying peptide, something which Byrzynski claims is necessary for antineoplastic activity. AS 2.1 (also derived from A-10) is a 4:1 mixture of PA and PAG. PA (also not a peptide) can be purchased at a chemical supply houses for about $0.09 a gram. A-10 is chemically extremely similar to glutithamide and thalidomide, both of which are habit forming and can cause peripheral neuropathy. The nasty effects of thalidomide are widely known. In spite of this similarity, A-10 does not appear to have been tested for it's potential to induce teratogenicity or peripheral neuropathy. Many of Burzynski's statements about the origin of his theory, early research, past and present support by others for his work have been shown to be untrue. sdb --- sdb@ssr.com
13sci.med
db7n+@andrew.cmu.edu (D. Andrew Byler) writes: >Mark Schnitzius writes: >>> Literal interpreters of the Bible will have a problem with this view, since >>>the Bible talks about the fires of Hell and such. >> >>This is something I've always found confusing. If all your nerve endings >>die with your physical body, why would flame hurt you? How can one "wail >>and gnash teeth" with no lungs and no teeth? >One can feel physical pain by having a body, which, if you know the >doctrine of the resurrection of the body, is what people will have after >the great judgement. "We look for the resurrection of the dead, and the >life of the world to come." - Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed. You >will have both body and soul in hell - eventually. Now this is getting interesting! I was raised Roman Catholic before becoming an atheist, so I have stated this Creed you quote nearly every Sunday until I was about 18. For some reason, I always took the 'resurrection' in this statement to mean the resurrection of the soul, but I guess resurrection does strictly mean the raising of the physical body. I have some questions on this point: 1. I always thought that Christians believe the descent into hell was pretty much immediate, and that there are people burning in hell right now. You seem to be implying that it will not occur until after the "great judgement" (which I read as meaning the proverbial Judgment Day). I was always a little confused on this point, even when I was with the church -- maybe someone can clear it up for me. Where will my "soul" (which, by the way, I don't believe in) exist until that time? 2. Will the new body I will have be created out of the same atoms that my body now is made of, or will it be built from scratch? My physical body now is susceptible to aging, etc. -- so I guess my new body will have to be radically different in order to be immortal so it can be tortured for all eternity? 3. Since I will have a physical body, I assume it will need a physical place to exist in -- where is this hell? In the center of the earth? Do you think we could find it if we dig? Mark Schnitzius schnitzi@eola.cs.ucf.edu Univ. of Central Florida [There is not complete agreement on the details of the afterlife. I think the most common view is that final disposition does not occur until a final judgement, which is still in the future. In the meantime, some believe that people "sleep" until the final resurrection (or because God is above time, pass directly from death to the future time when the resurrection occurs), while others believe that souls have a disembodied, pre-resurrection existence until then. There are probably other alternatives that I'm omitting. The new body is generally conceived of being implemented in a different "technology" than the current one, one which is not mortal. (Paul talks about the mortal being raised to immortality, and Jesus' resurrected body -- which is the first example -- clearly was not subject to the same kind of limitations as ours.) It is assumed that there are enough similarities that people will recognize each other, but I don't think most people claim to know the details. I don't think I'd say it's the same atoms. I'd assume there would be some analog of a physical place, but I wouldn't expect to find it under the earth or up in the sky. I'd suspect that it's in another dimension, outside this physical world, or whatever. But again, we have little in the way of details. --clh]
15soc.religion.christian
Hello, I have a 386sx25 notebook with windows 3.1 running fine. WINWORD 2.0 and QUATTRO-PRO for windows also work fine when no virtual memory is used. Switching on the virtual memory option these programs (probably others too) don't work, the system crashes. The same programs work well with arbitrary virtual memory on two other desktop PC's. What am I doing wrong? If you can help, please mail to me directly, if possible. Thank you very much in advance. Stefan /---------------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Stefan K. Kolodzie Heinrich-Heine-University | | Institute for General Psychology Duesseldorf, Germany | | e-mail: kolodzie@ze8.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de | \---------------------------------------------------------------------------/
2comp.os.ms-windows.misc
There's also Billy Jack, The Wild One, Smokey and the Bandit (Where Jerry Reed runs his truck over Motorcycle Gangs Bikes), and a video tape documentary on the Hell's Angels I found in a rental store once
8rec.motorcycles
MAG Innovision MX15F Fantastic 15" multiscan monitor that can display up to 1280x1024 noninterlaced (!) with .26 mm dot pitch. If you are looking for a large crystal clear super vga monitor then this is for you. $430 call Scott at (503) 757-3483 or email scotts@math.orst.edu
6misc.forsale
In article <1qnns0$4l3@agate.berkeley.edu> spp@zabriskie.berkeley.edu (Steve Pope) writes: >The mass of anectdotal evidence, combined with the lack of >a properly constructed scientific experiment disproving >the hypothesis, makes the MSG reaction hypothesis the >most likely explanation for events. You forgot the smiley-face. I can't believe this is what they turn out at Berkeley. Tell me you're an aberration. -- Steve Dyer dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
13sci.med
I just received some new information regarding the issue of BCCI and whether it is an Islamic bank etc. I am now about to post it under the heading "BCCI". Look for it there! Fred Rice darice@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au
0alt.atheism
bissda@saturn.wwc.edu (DAN LAWRENCE BISSELL) writes: > The book says that Jesus was either a liar, or he was crazy ( a >modern day Koresh) or he was actually who he said he was. Or he was just convinced by religious fantasies of the time that he was the Messiah, or he was just some rebel leader that an organisation of Jews built into Godhood for the purpose off throwing of the yoke of Roman oppression, or....... > Some reasons why he wouldn't be a liar are as follows. Who would >die for a lie? Are the Moslem fanatics who strap bombs to their backs and driving into Jewish embassies dying for the truth (hint: they think they are)? Were the NAZI soldiers in WWII dying for the truth? People die for lies all the time. >Wouldn't people be able to tell if he was a liar? People Was Hitler a liar? How about Napoleon, Mussolini, Ronald Reagan? We spend millions of dollars a year trying to find techniques to detect lying? So the answer is no, they wouldn't be able to tell if he was a liar if he only lied about some things. >gathered around him and kept doing it, many gathered from hearing or seeing >someone who was or had been healed. Call me a fool, but I believe he did >heal people. Why do you think he healed people, because the Bible says so? But if God doesn't exist (the other possibility) then the Bible is not divinely inspired and one can't use it as a piece of evidence, as it was written by unbiased observers. > Niether was he a lunatic. Would more than an entire nation be drawn >to someone who was crazy. Very doubtful, in fact rediculous. For example Were Hitler or Mussolini lunatics? How about Genghis Khan, Jim Jones... there are thousands of examples through history of people being drawn to lunatics. >anyone who is drawn to David Koresh is obviously a fool, logical people see >this right away. > Therefore since he wasn't a liar or a lunatic, he must have been the >real thing. So we obviously cannot rule out liar or lunatic not to mention all the other possibilities not given in this triad. > Some other things to note. He fulfilled loads of prophecies in >the psalms, Isaiah and elsewhere in 24 hrs alone. This in his betrayal Possibly self-fulfilling prophecy (ie he was aware what he should do in order to fulfil these prophecies), possibly selective diting on behalf of those keepers of the holy bible for a thousand years or so before the general; public had access. possibly also that the text is written in such riddles (like Nostradamus) that anything that happens can be twisted to fit the words of raving fictional 'prophecy'. >and Crucifixion. I don't have my Bible with me at this moment, next time I >write I will use it. [stuff about how hard it is to be a christian deleted] I severely recommend you reconsider the reasons you are a christian, they are very unconvincing to an unbiased observer. Jeff.
0alt.atheism
In article <1r7houINNop9@titan.ucs.umass.edu>, cma@titan.ucs.umass.edu (COLIN MA) writes: >I just started reading this newsgroup and haven't been following the >thread. I'm just curious: How did this thread get started with >"Albert Sabin" and changed into something else? What was it about >Sabin that initiated a religious discussion? > >Colin Its just variation within a thread. The variation at times has been so great that speciation has occurred. So Albert Sabin is the common ancestor of several threads, some of which have themselves speciated. On a separate topic, I subscribed to t.o. just recently. Albert Sabin existed at that time, so I have no clue as to its origins. Maybe the abiogenesists have an answer. I might also point out that evolution is aimless. Thus why Albert Sabin evolved into a religious discussion is probably unexplainable. Rich Fox, Anthro, Usouthdakota
19talk.religion.misc
In article <1qjfnv$ogt@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de>, frank@D012S658.uucp (Frank O'Dwyer) wrote: > (1) Does the term "hero-worship" mean anything to you? Yes, worshipping Jesus as the super-saver is indeed hero-worshipping of the grand scale. Worshipping Lenin that will make life pleasant for the working people is, eh, somehow similar, or what. > (2) I understand that gods are defined to be supernatural, not merely > superhuman. The notion of Lenin was on the borderline of supernatural insights into how to change the world, he wasn't a communist God, but he was the man who gave presents to kids during Christmas. > #Actually, I agree. Things are always relative, and you can't have > #a direct mapping between a movement and a cause. However, the notion > #that communist Russia was somewhat the typical atheist country is > #only something that Robertson, Tilton et rest would believe in. > > Those atheists were not True Unbelievers, huh? :-) Don't know what they were, but they were fanatics indeed. Cheers, Kent --- sandvik@newton.apple.com. ALink: KSAND -- Private activities on the net.
0alt.atheism
In article <C5u1LI.7EM@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>, davide@dcs.qmw.ac.uk (Dave Edmondson) writes: |> Lotus looks set for a management buyout. GM weren't happy that the Elan was |> late and too pricey. If they can write off the Elan development costs the may |> be able to sell them for a sensible price. I read that GM wants to keep the Design part of Lotus but lose the car production. And, I seem to remember, that the main problem with the Elan was caused by GM's insistence that the Elan be re-designed (significantly) for the US market which caused major design & production headaches. |> : : I think there is a legal clause in the RR name, regardless of who owns it |> : : it must be a British company/owner - i.e. BA can sell the company but not |> : : the name. |> |> : : kevinh@hasler.ascom.ch |> |> : I don't believe that BA have anything to do with RR. It's a seperate |> : company from the RR Aero-Engine company. |> |> It's Vickers who own Rolls Royce cars. Quite true - brain fade on my part. |> David Edmondson davide@dcs.qmw.ac.uk kevinh@hasler.ascom.ch
8rec.motorcycles
Discounts! Please take $2.00 off each item over $10.00 $1.00 off each item over $ 5.00 Here is the list of magazines, including asking price: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Strategy & Tactics Magazine (All include unpunched games): =========================== NEW (52 & 79-90 As mailed with games and all inclusions.) Issue: Title: Asking: 52 Oil War - American Intervention in The Persian Gulf 35.00 79 Berlin '85 - The Enemy at the Gates 20.00 81 Tito - Partisan Army Yugoslavia, 1941-45 20.00 83 Kaiser's Battle - German Offensive March, 1918 20.00 84 Operation Grenade - Rhineland Feb 23-Mar 5, 1945 20.00 89 Sicily - The Race to Messina Jul 10-Aug 17, 1943 20.00 90 The Battle of Monmouth - Colonies take Offensive 1778 20.00 ----------End of an Era --------------------------------------------- NEW (113-127 As mailed with games and all inclusions in envelope.) Issue: Title: Asking: 113 The Battle of Abensberg (Magazine only) 15.00 115 Kanev - Russian Paratroops 15.00 116 Manchu - The Taiping Rebellion 15.00 117 North German Plain - Modern Germany 15.00 118 The Tigers Are Burning - Camp. in the Ukraine '43-44 15.00 120 Nicararagua 15.00 122 Pegasus Bridge - The Beginning of D-Day 15.00 123 Campaigns in the Valley 15.00 124 Fortress Stalingrad - Russian Winter Offensive '42-43 15.00 125 The Far Seas - German Cruiser Operations WWII 15.00 126 Beirut 1982 - Arab Stalingrad 15.00 127 Rush for Glory - War with Mexico 1846-47 15.00 The AH General Magazine: (Many other articles included in each issue) ======================= Issue Title Asking Vol. # 7-80 Crescendo of Doom 8.00 17/2 11-80 Fortress Europa 8.00 17/4 1-81 Circus Maximus 8.00 17/5 3-81 Stalingra 8.00 17/6 5-81 Bismark, Squad Leader Clinic 8.00 18/1 Campaign Magazine: (Many other articles included in each issue) ================= Issue Title Asking 97 Crescendo of Doom 8.00 101 Cross of Iron 8.00 102 Counterstroke at Inchon 8.00 104 Squad Leader Variant 8.00 106 GDW's 1941 8.00 108 Battle for Leyte Gulf 8.00 All magazine prices include postage. ALL ISSUES ARE IN NEW OR LIKE-NEW CONDITION. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Games and Books: =============== Yaquinto Publications, Inc.: =========================== Attack of the Mutants - Introductory Game $ 5.00 (Unpunched, new.) --- The Complete Book of Wargames (out of print) $30.00 -------------------------------------------- Author: Jon Freeman (Part 1 Introduction 75 pages - including Ch. 4 Kassala: An Introductory Wargame) (Complete information on over 150 wargames as of 1980) [hardcover, 285 pages, large format] --- Shipping extra on books and games. Prefer money orders for payment, I'll allow personal checks to clear before shipping. Larry Larry McElhiney 1385 7th Avenue #10 Santa Cruz, CA 95062 (408)426-5858 x 358 (w) (408)475-8027 (h)
6misc.forsale
I've got a Racet 5.25" MO Drive with a Ricoh RO-5030E mechanism with the new ROMs... The thing is, I have a new TOSOH Optical Disk 512/bytes per sector cart for the thing that refuses to mount or be formatted... all the carts that I have for the drive that work are Racet Certified Media 512k/sector carts... All I can think of is that this TOSOH cart uses some kind of incompatible low level format... anyone know what software will allow this to be formatted on this drive? or a new DIP setting for the mechanism? I've tried just about every combination of drivers and custom formatting programs I can find with no luck... any ideas? joshc@csa.bu.edu (if you have a good idea, please e-mail it to this address if possible, I can't check this newsgroup constantly, thanks)
4comp.sys.mac.hardware
In article <1993Mar19.215728.24473@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> arromdee@jyusenkyou.cs.jhu.edu (Ken Arromdee) writes: >Armenians did not genocide Turks. See, you are a paid liar. Source: "World Alive, A Personal Story" by Robert Dunn. Crown Publishers, Inc., New York (1952). (Memoirs of an American officer who witnessed the Armenian genocide of 2.5 million Muslim people) p. 363 (first paragraph). "From daybreak on, Armenian villagers poured in from miles around..... The women plundered happily, chattering like ravens as they picked over the carcass of Djul. They hauled out every hovel's chattels, the last scrap of food or cloth, and staggered away, packing pots, saddlebags, looms, even spinning-wheels. 'Thank you for a lot, Dro,' I said to him back in camp. 'But now I must leave.'...We shook hands, the captain said 'A bientot, mon camarade.' And for hours the old Molokan scout and I plodded north across parching plains. Like Lot's wife I looked back once to see smoke bathing all, doubtless in a sack of other Moslem villages up to the line of snow that was Iran.'" (to be continued...) Serdar Argic 'We closed the roads and mountain passes that might serve as ways of escape for the Turks and then proceeded in the work of extermination.' (Ohanus Appressian - 1919) 'In Soviet Armenia today there no longer exists a single Turkish soul.' (Sahak Melkonian - 1920)
17talk.politics.mideast
In article <1993Apr15.132954.4396@news.columbia.edu> lasner@watsun.cc.columbia.edu (Charles Lasner) writes: >How dare you presume that he even has a right to go around a newsgroup >with a desire to convince others of any external position he has. They are news because they are the exceptions. And the 'Islamic Holocaust' is much the topic of the day. The historical evidence proves that during the period of 1914 to 1920, the Armenian Government ordered, incited, assisted and participated in the genocide of 2.5 million Muslim people because of race, religion and national origin. Armenians perpetrated acts of sabotage, destroyed telephone cables, blew up bridges, blocked passes, set up ambushes, attacked security stations and small Turkish outposts behind the Ottoman Army lines on the one hand, and on the other ruthlessly attacked Turkish and Kurdish villages, slaughtering the Turkish population indiscriminately, women, children, old and young alike. Innocent Muslims were one by one cruelly bayonetted to death, or massacred with axes and swords, or else shut up in mosques or in schools and then burnt alive as can be seen below. Widespread Armenian massacres of innocent Muslims took place in regions of Van, Kars, Sivas, Erzurum, Bitlis, Erzincan, Mus, Diyarbakir and Maras. The Ottoman Army, while fighting to prevent the Russian invasion, also had to deal with Armenian genocide squads who cowardly hit from behind. The Armenian genocide of the Muslims spread to all parts of Eastern Anatolia. Starting from late 1914, Armenians committed widespread massacres and genocide in Eastern Anatolia, because the arena was left to the Armenians. Almost every Turkish town and village from Erzincan up to Azerbaidjan suffered large scale massacres and genocide by Armenians and the Turkish genocide has been documented by Armenian, Russian, American, British, Ottoman, German, Austrian and French journalists and officers who observed the first genocide of this century committed by the blood-thirsty Armenian genocide squads. The Ottoman Army, liberating Trabzon, Bayburt, Erzincan, Erzurum, Kars and other regions from the Russians, saw that the cities and their villages had been destroyed and burnt, people slaughtered, massacred. The massacres conducted by Armenians, which became a black stain for humanity, shocked and disgusted even the Russian, British, German, Austrian, French and American authorities. Almost every Ottoman document is related to Armenian massacres and cruelties. The inhuman treatment, cruelties, atrocities, genocide by Armenian genocide squads perpetrated against innocent Moslem Turkish and Kurdish people, are sufficiently reflected in historical documents. Even today over seventy-five years later, the terrifying screams of the victims of these cruelties can be heard. Source: Documents: Volume I (1919). "Document No: 76," Archive No: 1/2, Cabin No: 109, Drawer No: 3, File No: 346, Section No: 427(1385), Contents No: 3, 52-53. (To Lt. Colonel Seyfi, General Headquarters, Second Section, Istanbul - Dr. Stephan Eshnanie) 'Neues Wiener Tagblatt' - Vienna, 'Pester Lloyd' 'Local Anzliger' - Berlin, 'Algemeen Handelsblat' - Amsterdam, 'Vakit' - Istanbul. "I have been closely following for two weeks the withdrawal of Russians and Armenians from Turkish territories through Armenia. Although two months have elapsed since the clearing of the territories of Armenian gangs, I have been observing the evidence of the cruelties of the Armenians at almost every step. All the villages from Trabzon to Erzincan and from Erzincan to Erzurum are destroyed. Corpses of Turks brutally and cruelly slain are everywhere. According to accounts by those who were able to save their lives by escaping to mountains, the first horrible and fearful events begun when the Russian forces evacuated the places which were then taken over by Armenian gangs. The Russians usually treated the people well, but the people feared the intervention of the Armenians. Once these places had been taken over by the Armenians, however, the massacres begun. They clearly announced their intention of clearing what they called the Armenian and Kurdish land from the Turks and thus, solve the nationality problem. Today I had the opportunity to meet Austrian and German soldiers who had escaped from Russian prison camps and come from Kars and Alexander Paul (Gumru-Leninakan)...Russian officers tried to save the Turks and there were clashes between Russian officers and Armenian gangs. I am now in Erzurum, and what I see is terrible. Almost the whole city is destroyed. The smell of the corpses still fills the air. Although there are speculations that Armenian gangs murdered Austrian and German prisoners as well, I could not get the supporting evidence in this regard, but there is proof of murdering of Turkish prisoners of war." Dr. Stephan Eshnanie Serdar Argic 'We closed the roads and mountain passes that might serve as ways of escape for the Turks and then proceeded in the work of extermination.' (Ohanus Appressian - 1919) 'In Soviet Armenia today there no longer exists a single Turkish soul.' (Sahak Melkonian - 1920)
17talk.politics.mideast
I believe that that would be the same as a system error #64. Since there is no error #64, then I would guess that it would be a -64 error. Which is a font manager error of "error during font declairation". I would assume that the system that's on the floppy that you are trying start up on has a corrupted font in it, or something like that. Mario Murphy **** From Planet BMUG, the FirstClass BBS of BMUG. The message contained in **** this posting does not in any way reflect BMUG's official views.
4comp.sys.mac.hardware
NOTE: followups to comp.dcom.modems (for obvious reasons) In article <1r0mb9$67h@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> da416@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Andy Nicola) writes: >In a previous article, cs3sd3ae@maccs.mcmaster.ca (Holly KS) says: >>What is the difference between the US Robotics Courier v32bis external and the >>Sportster 14400 external? I see that the price of a Sportster has dramatically >>dropped to below $200 but the price of the Courier remains above $400. >> >>Anyone with knowledge of both of these modems or anyone that owns a Courier? the Courier is their top-of-the-line product, thus the higher price. I've never taken a real look at the Sportster line (only Couriers), but from what I've gathered, it's basically more of an entry-level modem. probably doesn't meet the same specifications that the Courier does. I'm not sure if the Sportster line is fully DSP driven like the (more recent) Courier modems are, so upgrades in the future may be an issue. again, take all of the above with a grain of salt...I've never evaluated the Sportster, so I'm going by bits and pieces that I've heard. if you want a real answer, post the question in comp.dcom.modems and you'll find people who HAVE worked with the Sportster. personally, though, if I were going to look at the Courier modems, I'd buy the Dual Standard...then I'd get both HST and V.32bis. in fact, this is exactly what I did. :-) I'm sitting here looking at my USR DS right now. and now, to correct a few VERY incorrect statements.... folks, if you want to get reliable answers to modem and/or UART questions, post them to comp.dcom.modems. if you post in other groups, you never know what you'll get in the way of an answer (you may very well get a good answer...or you may get something like the one below). at least in cdm, if someone posts complete and utter bs, you'll see a flurry of folks correcting them (to avoid spreading faulty info). >The Sportster at 14.4 has v.42 error control and v.42 bis data compression. just as it does at lower speeds, too. there is absolutely nothing in either CCITT Recommendation V.42 or V.42bis that says that they can only operate on modems that are running V.32bis. V.42bis, of course, is currently only *STANDARDIZED* for operation on top of V.42 (in its primary mode of operation, LAPM), but that's about as far as that goes. and just in case there's some confusion on this, V.42/V.42bis are also supported by the Courier line (unless you have a really ancient one). >The difference >with the Courier, is that it can run at 16.8 and only in the HST mode. take a second look at the original question: >In a previous article, cs3sd3ae@maccs.mcmaster.ca (Holly KS) says: >>What is the difference between the US Robotics Courier v32bis external ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ see the V.32bis up there? the question was not about the Courier HST modem, or about the Courier Dual Standard...it was about the Courier V.32bis modem. the modem in question does not support HST, period. it therefore does not support the 16.8 kb HST. also, not all Courier HST / Courier Dual Standard modems support the 16.8 kb version of HST. my Dual Standard only supports HST at 14.4 kb. there are even older models that only run HST at 9.6 kb. >This is a proprietary mode of USR and it will only connect to another of >the same type unit to achieve this speed. HST is USR's proprietary modulation scheme.... but we're not talking about HST, we're talking about V.32bis. V.32bis is most definitely *NOT* a proprietary modulation scheme. >The Sportster will do >asynchronous transmissions as well as synchronous. The HST is one way >only. I do hope you didn't mean for these two sentences to be related in some way..... first off, V.32 and V.32bis are both synchronous and asynchronous. this is part of the CCITT Recommendation (i.e., part of the standard). it isn't a feature unique to the Sportster (I just looked at the appropriate chapter in the Courier DS manual). second, HST is not ``one way only.'' more correctly put, it is an asymmetrical modulation scheme, meaning it doesn't work at the same speed in both directions. HST operates at [9.6 / 14.4 / 16.8] in one direction, and has a low-speed back-channel in the other direction. the high-speed channel goes in the direction of the higher data flow. this is fine if you're logged on to say, a BBS, and type one letter and get screens of info back, transfer files (not using bimodem), etc.... there is, of course, a penalty for turnaround time when the high-speed channel needs to reverse directions. V.32 and V.32bis are both symmetrical, meaning they do transfer the full data rate in both directions at the same time. third, synchronous vs asynchronous has absolutely nothing to do with symmetrical vs asymmetrical...they are two completely different topics. >The HST's will be upgradeable to the v.fast spec when it is available. again, more correctly put, *SOME* of the Courier line will be upgradeable to whatever ``V.fast'' is called when it's complete. if you have the large footprint Courier modems (like I do), you're S.O.L..... there was an upgrade plan a while back to upgrade to a small footprint variety, which could eventually be upgraded to support V.fast, but the cost of the two upgrades together pretty much put it higher than just buying a new modem. later..... --jim -- #include <std_disclaimer.h> 73 DE N5IAL (/4) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ INTERNET: jim@n5ial.mythical.com | j.graham@ieee.org ICBM: 30.23N 86.32W AMATEUR RADIO: n5ial@w4zbb (Ft. Walton Beach, FL) AMTOR SELCAL: NIAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ E-mail me for information about KAMterm (host mode for Kantronics TNCs).
3comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
In <1r3mmnINN4p1@master.cs.rose-hulman.edu> henslelf@nextwork.Rose-Hulman.Edu. (Lige F Hensley) writes: >In article <120466@netnews.upenn.edu> jhaines@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Jason >Haines) writes: >> >> I was wondering if people had any good uses for old >> 256k SIMMs. I have a bunch of them for the Apple Mac >> and I know lots of other people do to. I have tried to >> sell them but have gotten NO interest. >> >> So, if you have an inovative use (or want to buy >> some SIMMs 8-) ) >Sure I'll give you 10 bucks for all of them I think they are really neat to put onto key rings. When somebody makes the mistake of asking about it, you can *totally* geek out. tc
12sci.electronics
In article <1993Apr6.155118.5779@ra.msstate.edu> js1@Isis.MsState.Edu (Jiann-ming Su) writes: > In article <ls1d6vINNs65@appserv.Eng.Sun.COM> str@maredsous.Eng.Sun.COM (Todd Rader) writes: > >Stay in school. You have a lot to learn. > > Learn what? I know that 3 million dollars is A LOT of money. I know > Rickey Henderson doesn't have a career out of baseball. I know if he > didn't have baseball, he wouldn't be making near the money he is now. > And Michael Jackson, Jack Nicholson, and Bill Cosby wouldn't be making near as much money if they weren't entertainers. So what's your point? > I just don't understand how some athlete, who only plays a sport for a > living for millions of dollars, say he is not being paid enough. > > If nobody will sign him for his asking price, he will be the one hurting. > The A's will still win without him. Will they? You can't usually take away one of the team's best players and still expect them to win. Or do you think the Pirates will continue to win without Barry Bonds. > > Remeber, many of these athletes have NOTHING if not for their athletic > ability. NOTHING. They are getting paid MUCH more than most hard working > citizens, and they are complaining of not enough pay. So. Again, Jack Nicholson gets paid much more than most hard working citizens (and much more than Rickey Henderson for that matter). > > I don't have a problem with them making millions. My problem is when the > say they aren't being paid enough, when they already get 3 million--also, > their numbers get worse. The reason the latter often happens is that many of these folks start making the real big salaries late in their career, when they are on the decline. (There are exceptions, of course. Dave Parker fell apart after making his first million because he put most of that million up his nose.) -- Jim Mann Stratus Computer jmann@vineland.pubs.stratus.com
9rec.sport.baseball
Is anyone reading this message involved with the new BMW plant? (does BMW corporate even have a net-connection?) desperately seeking info, Jeff Hagen hagenjd@ac.wfu.edu
7rec.autos
In article <C5r4IA.A21@acsu.buffalo.edu> v111qheg@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (P.VASILION) writes: > With the Davidians all dead, [...] One minor point here: they're not all dead. Not that I'm inclined to stand up for BATF or the FBI, mind you. -- The views expressed herein are | Theodore A. Kaldis my own only. Do you seriously | kaldis@remus.rutgers.edu believe that a major university | {...}!rutgers!remus.rutgers.edu!kaldis as this would hold such views??? |
18talk.politics.misc
In article <1993Apr1.024850.20111@sradzy.uucp>, radzy@sradzy.uucp (T.O. Radzykewycz) writes: > >>swaim@owlnet.rice.edu (Michael Parks Swaim) writes: > >>> 666, the file permission of the beast. > > >radzy@sradzy.uucp (T.O. Radzykewycz) writes: > >> Sorry, but the file permission of the beast is 600. > >> > >> And the file permission of the home directory of the > >> beast is 700. > > boylan@sltg04.ljo.dec.com (Steve Boylan) writes: > >Hey, radzy, it must depend on your system's access policy. > >I get: > > $ ls -lg /usr/users > > total 3 > > drwxrwxrwx 22 beast system 1536 Jan 01 1970 beast > > drwxr-x--x 32 boylan users 2048 Mar 31 09:08 boylan > > drwxr-xr-x 2 guest users 512 Sep 18 1992 guest > > $ su > > Password: > > root $ su beast > > beast $ umask > > 111 > > beast $ ^D > > root $ ^D > > $ > > Just a minute.... > > $ grep beast /etc/passwd > beast:k5tUk76RAUogQ:497:0:Not Walt Disney!:/usr/users/beast: > $ mv /usr/users/beast/.profile /usr/users/beast/.profile, > $ echo umask 077 >> /usr/users/beast/.profile > $ cat > /usr/users/beast/.profile > chmod 700 /usr/users/beast > mv .mailrc .mailrc, > echo beast logged in | mail radzy%sradzy@jack.sns.com > mv .mailrc, .mailrc > mv /usr/users/beast/.profile, /usr/users/beast/.profile > ^D > $ chmod 777 /usr/users/beast/.profile > $ cat /usr/users/beast/.profile, >> /usr/users/beast/.profile > > <waits a while, finally gets mail.> > > I think you made a mistake. Check it again. > I see . . . you're not running Ultrix! :-) - - Steve -- Don't miss the 49th New England Folk Festival, April 23-25, 1993 in Natick, Massachusetts!
19talk.religion.misc
In article <1993Apr26.063532.10120@eff.org> mnemonic@eff.org (Mike Godwin) writes: > In article <C614BJ.BK6@agora.rain.com> jhart@agora.rain.com (Jim Hart) writes: > >"The security of the system should depend only on the secrecy of > >the keys and not on the secrecy of the algorithms" -- Dorothy Denning > > Cite source, please. Dorothy Denning, _Cryptography and Data Security_, 1982, Addison Wesley. Page 8, under the heading "Cryptosystems must satisfy three general requirements. The other two are efficiency and ease of use. --Michael L. Mauldin Carnegie Mellon University
11sci.crypt
***************************** * WARRIORS TICKETS FOR SALE * ***************************** I have 2 tickets that I can't use (Last pair this year). Section 109, Row P, Seats 8 & 9 DAY DATE OPPONENT TIME --- ---- -------- ---- WED 4/21 Sacremento 7:30 Price: $45.00 = MY COST Call or email if you are interested in these tickets. Lorne Johnson lorne@sun.com (408) 562-6003
6misc.forsale
In article <1993Apr21.012139.13444@Princeton.EDU> roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig) writes: >When I say "black," I mean US-born black people for the purposes of this >discussion. Hispanic players were in baseball before 1947, and one >team in the 50's signed lots of hispanics because they went over better >with the local audience than blacks did. What about black hispanics? >>And why would more hispanics stick around than blacks? > >Don't know. But remember: this is the country that had special racial ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >laws for one group and one group only: blacks. Our national history ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Man, you had better do some SERIOUS reading. I really, really doubt that you meant to say this. Mike -- Disclaimer - These opiini^H^H damn! ^H^H ^Q ^[ .... :w :q :wq :wq! ^d ^X ^? exit X Q ^C ^? :quitbye CtrlAltDel ~~q :~q logout save/quit :!QUIT ^[zz ^[ZZZZZZ ^vi man vi ^@ ^L ^[c ^# ^E ^X ^I ^T ? help helpquit ^D ^d !! man help ^C ^c :e! help exit ?Quit ?q CtrlShftDel "Hey, what does Stop L1A d..."
9rec.sport.baseball
In a prior article ajaffe@oddjob.uchicago.edu (Andrew Jaffe) wrote: > Hi. > > I use Emacs and I want to customize my keyboard better. > When I set up stuff in my .emacs with a keymap and define-keys, > I can only access certain of the keys on my X-Terminal's > keyboard. I can't get e.g. F10, Home, End, PgUp, PgDn; they all > seem to have either the same or no keycode. I have a feeling > this can't be fixed in emacs itself, but that I need to do some > xmodmap stuff. Can someone help me? Unfortunately, the key event handling is pretty much hardwired into emacs. I ran into this problem a while back; my solution was to change the source code so that all of these special keys generated character sequences which basically encoded the keysym and modifier state as escape sequences -- for example, the sequence "ESC [ 1 B 7" would indicate that the "HOME" key was pressed, with the shift key down. You could also detect standard keys with odd modifiers, such as "shift-Return". If anybody wants these changes, they're welcome to them, but you'll have to have the source available and be comfortable munging with it a bit. Basically you have to replace the keypress handling code in the source file "x11term.c". Maybe if someone at OSF is interested, I can send them the tweaks, but I imagine they've got bigger fish to fry (hopefully including the much talked about emacs V19!). If there's sufficient interest, I'll post the mods somewhere, although this probably isn't the appropriate group for it. Notes: * This special code will only apply if you let emacs create its own (X11) window. If you run it in plain old tty mode (which includes Xterm windows) then it's business as usual. * The patches I made were to version 18.58, under Sun OS 4.1.2 [I also did this a while back under HP-UX]. The patches are in a chunk of code between '#if sun ... #endif' but could easily be adapted for anything else. +-------------------------------------------------------+------- /// -----+ | Mark Lanzo KD4QLZ lanzo@tekelec.com 919-460-5576 | \\\/// | +-------------------------------------------------------+---- \XX/ -------+
5comp.windows.x
on wednesday morning, another driver decided to illegally turn left in front of me, doing great damage to my car (Honda Civic). i have yet to pay off the car, and the body shop says the insurance company wants to total the car. i haven't been able to get in touch with the person handling my claim, so i checked on some things: 1) my payout is $3700.00 2) Blue Book retail is $5650.00 3) loan value is $4450.00 4) trade-in value is $4000.00 could anyone give me any advice on what i should/could do if the insurance company does not give me a reasonable amount for the loss of the car. thanks, james baker baker@dfwvx1.dallas.geoquest.slb.com
7rec.autos
There is an article in Communications Week (April 12's issue) which states definitively that not only is the justice department trying to revive the "wiretapping bill", but they are ALSO trying to find a way to force key registration. CLIPPER is an obvious thrust in exactly this direction. Dorothy Dennings is quoted in this missive. Communications Week, April 12th, page 8. Read it and get peeved folks. Then ACT NOW or lose your fundamental right to privacy. Clinton has shown us that his only interest in this has to do with abortion, and not the right of all citizens to be secure in their papers and effects. -- Karl Denninger (karl@genesis.MCS.COM) | You can never please everyone except Data Line: [+1 312 248-0900] | by bankrupting yourself. LIVE Internet in Chicago; an MCSNET first!
11sci.crypt
SSF is up for redesign again. Let's do it right this time! Let's step back and consider the functionality we want: [1] microgravity/vacuum process research [2] life sciences research (adaptation to space) [3] spacecraft maintenence The old NASA approach, explified by Shuttle and SSF so far, was to centralize functionality. These projects failed to meet their targets by a wide margin: the military and commercial users took most of their payloads off Shuttle after wasting much effort to tie their payloads to it, and SSF has crumbled into disorganization and miscommunication. Over $50 billion has been spent on these two projects with no reduction in launch costs and littel improvement in commercial space industrialization. Meanwhile, military and commercial users have come up with a superior strategy for space development: the constellation. Firstly, different functions are broken down into different constellations placed in the optimal orbit for each function: thus we have the GPS/Navstar constellation in 12-hour orbits, comsats in Clarke and Molniya orbits, etc. Secondly, the task is distributed amongst several spacecraft in a constellation, providing for redundancy and full coverage where needed. SSF's 3 main functions require quite different environments and are also prime candidates for constellization. [1] We have the makings of a microgravity constellation now: COMET and Mir for long-duration flights, Shuttle/Spacelab for short-duration flights. The best strategy for this area is inexpensive, incremental improvement: installation of U.S. facilities on Mir, Shuttle/Mir linkup, and transition from Shuttle/Spacelab to a much less expensive SSTO/Spacehab/COMET or SSTO/SIF/COMET. We might also expand the research program to take advantage of interesting space environments, eg the high-radiation Van Allen belt or gas/plasma gradients in comet tails. The COMET system can be much more easily retrofitted for these tasks, where a station is too large to affordably launch beyond LEO. [2] We need to study life sciences not just in microgravity, but also in lunar and Martian gravities, and in the radiation environments of deep space instead of the protected shelter of LEO. This is a very long-term, low-priority project, since astronauts will have little practical use in the space program until costs come down orders of magnitude. Furthermore, using astronauts severely restricts the scope of the investigation, and the sample size. So I propose LabRatSat, a constellation tether-bolo satellites that test out various levels of gravity in super-Van-Allen-Belt orbits that are representative of the radiation environment encountered on Earth-Moon, Earth-Mars, Earth-asteroid, etc. trips. The miniaturized life support machinery might be operated real-time from earth thru a VR interface. AFter several orbital missions have been flown, follow-ons can act as LDEFs on the lunar and Martian surface, testing out the actual environment at low cost before $billions are spent on astronauts. [3] By far the largest market for spacecraft servicing is in Clarke orbit. I propose a fleet of small teleoperated robots and small test satellites on which ground engineers can practice their skills. Once in place, robots can pry stuck solar arrays and antennas, attach solar battery power packs, inject fuel, etc. Once the fleet is working, it can be spun off to commercial company(s) who can work with the comsat companies to develop comsat replaceable module standards. By applying the successful constellation strategy, and getting rid of the failed centralized strategy of STS and old SSF, we have radically improved the capability of the program while greatly cutting its cost. For a fraction of SSF's pricetag, we can fix satellites where the satellites are, we can study life's adaptation to a much large & more representative variety of space environments, and we can do microgravity and vacuum research inexpensively and, if needed, in special-purpose orbits. N.B., we can apply the constellation strategy to space exploration as well, greatly cutting its cost and increasing its functionality. Mars Network and Artemis are two good examples of this; more ambitiously we can set up a network of native propellant plants on Mars that can be used to fuel planet-wide rover/ballistic hopper prospecting and sample return. The descendants of LabRatSat's technology can be used as a Mars surface LDEF and to test out closed-ecology greenhouses on Mars at low cost. -- Nick Szabo szabo@techboook.com
14sci.space
In article <C5L480.K7u@elite.intel.com> dgw@elite.intel.com (Dennis Willson) writes: [..] > > On February 28, 1993, the special agents attempting to serve the > Federal search warrant were all dressed in apparel clearly identified > with the letters "ATF" and a highly visible police-type badge. > Additionally, the special agents announced who they were and their > purpose for being at the compound. > > Immediately following this announcement, gunfire erupted from the > compound, resulting in the deaths of four ATF special agents and the > wounding of several others. Through no fault of ATF, the element of > surprise was lost, which caused the tragedy. This statement simply amazes me! "Through no fault of ATF, the element of surprise was lost"! What element of surprise? In the paragraph preceding this one, he said "... the special agents announced who they were and their purpose for being at the compound", which was to serve the federal warrant. No element of surprise was even needed for that. No, the element of surprise that they lost was that needed for a preemptive first strike, without warning. > Inasmuch as the warrants > remain sealed by a U.S. magistrate, and the investigation remains in an > active ongoung status, we are prohibited from disclosing any further > information at this time. > Read: They need to wait until they see how it comes out before they fabricate anymore, which could get disproven. > We hope we have been responsive to your letter. Please let us know > whenever we may be of service. > > Sincerely yours, > > Daniel M. H??l??tt [can't make out signature] > Deputy Director As always, no facts, just my opinions/observations. Jim -- jmd@handheld.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "I'm always rethinking that. There's never been a day when I haven't rethought that. But I can't do that by myself." Bill Clinton 6 April 93 "If I were an American, as I am an Englishman, while a foreign troop was landed in my country, I never would lay down my arms,-never--never--never!" WILLIAM PITT, EARL OF CHATHAM 1708-1778 18 Nov. 1777
16talk.politics.guns
pjs269@tijc02.uucp (Paul Schmidt) writes: > I want to know that I have a competent doctor when I am ill. Government > regulations have driven up costs and decreased quality by providing a > monopoly for licensed M.D.s. Many procedures could be performed by > qualified nurses but doctors are forced to do them. The common cold > must be diagnosed by a licensed doctor who is the only one who is > allowed to write a perscription. Doctor's are spending much of their > time on such mundane cases that they cannot have the time to spend on > the really tough cases. This results in higher cost, lower quality > medical care. Here in Georgia, the state legislature in 1992 "accidentally passed a law lobbied for by Opthamologists prohibiting anyone but a licensed MD from giving shots. They were trying to limit Optometrists from competing with them. They inadvertantly forbade nurses, EMTs, dentists, and tattoo artists from "piercing the skin." (probably diabetics too). The Secretary of State's office announced on June 30th that they wouldn't enforce it pending reconsideration in the 1003 Legislature. In the hassle over the state flag I heard nothing about repealing it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- cutter@gloster.via.mind.org (chris) All jobs are easy to the person who doesn't have to do them. Holt's law
18talk.politics.misc
I suppose you're an expert in how brutal things were. You were there, I suppose?
16talk.politics.guns
In article <2775@snap> paj@uk.co.gec-mrc (Paul Johnson) writes: >This is vague, so I am posting it in case anyone else knows more. > >I recall reading of a phonograph which used mechanical amplification. >Compressed air was squirted out of a valve which was controlled by the >pickup. The result was noisy and distinctly lo-fi, but much louder NASA and related agencies apparently used this same principles to create the loudest reported reproduced sound. They used an "analog" electrically controlled valve to control the flow of air across a horn throat. If I remember correctly it was called a "modulated air blast transducer". There were reports of the thing being able to produce 106 dB @ 80 Hz @ 10 mile distance, communicate directly with fighter pilots @ 5000 ft, etc. Regards, Gordon. -- WATERS,CLYDE GORDON-BME '93-Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta Ga. "Out of the mountain of despair, we can hew the stone of hope"- MLK Jr. uucp: ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt0869a Internet: gt0869a@prism.gatech.edu
12sci.electronics
In a previous article, jaa12@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (John A Absood) says: >It is never wise to confuse "freedom of speech" with "freedom" >of racism and violent deragatory." > >It is unfortunate that many fail to understand this crucial >distinction. I couldn't agree more. Canada has an anti-hate law which exists to punish those who wilfully spread false propaganda (lies) for the purpose of putting down another group. This is actually the law that David Irving will hopefully be found guilty under due to his denial of the Holocaust. It's too bad that this useless "Centre for Policy Research" isn't in Canada. It'd set a nice precedent to how the law applies in Cyberspace. Steve -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | Internet: aa229@freenet.carleton.ca Fidonet: 1:163/109.18 | | Mossad@qube.ocunix.on.ca | | <<My opinions are not associated with anything, including my head.>> |
17talk.politics.mideast
In article <1993May14.025626.14855@news.uiowa.edu> mau@herky.cs.uiowa.edu (Mau Napoleon) writes: >There are treaties signed between Greece and Turkey which speak about a >Moslem minority in Thraki and not of a Turkish minority in Thraki. >The reason they talk about Moslems and not about Turks is that the majority >of these people are not ethnik Turks. They are Pomaks and Gypsies. Oboy, this is exciting. First you discuss your non-existent literature tastes, then your fantasies, and now your choices of historical revisionism. Are you related to 'Arromdians' of the ASALA/SDPA/ARF Terrorism and Revisionism Triangle? The Agreement on the Exchange of Minorities uses the term 'Turks,' which demonstrates what is actually meant by the previous reference to 'Muslims.' The fact that the Greek governments also mention the existence of a few thousand non-Turkish Muslims does not change the essential reality that there lives in Western Thrace a much bigger Turkish minority. The 'Pomaks' are also a Muslim people, whom all the three nations (Bulgarians, Turks, and Greeks) consider as part of themselves. Do you know how the Muslim Turkish minority was organized according to the agreements? It also proves that the Turkish people are trapped in Greece and the Greek people are free to settle anywhere in the world. The Greek authorities deny even the existence of a Turkish minority. They pursue the same denial in connection with the Macedonians of Greece. Talk about oppression. In addition, in 1980 the 'democratic' Greek Parliament passed Law No. 1091, virtually taking over the administration of the vakiflar and other charitable trusts. They have ceased to be self-supporting religious and cultural entities. Talk about fascism. The Greek governments are attempting to appoint the muftus, irrespective of the will of the Turkish minority, as state official. Although the Orthodox Church has full authority in similar matters in Greece, the Muslim Turkish minority will have no say in electing its religious leaders. Talk about democracy. The government of Greece has recently destroyed an Islamic convention in Komotini. Such destruction, which reflects an attitude against the Muslim Turkish cultural heritage, is a violation of the Lausanne Convention as well as the 'so-called' Greek Constitution, which is supposed to guarantee the protection of historical monuments. The government of Greece, on the other hand, is building new churches in remote villages as a complementary step toward Hellenizing the region. The longstanding use of the adjective 'Turkish' in titles and on signboards is prohibited. The Greek courts have ordered the closure of the Turkish Teachers' Association, the Komotini Turkish Youth Association and the Ksanti Turkish Association on grounds that there are no Turks in Western Thrace. Such community associations had been active until 1984. But they were first told to remove the word 'Turkish' on their buildings and on their official papers and then eventually close down. This is also the final verdict (November 4, 1987) of the Greek High Court. Helsinki Watch, a well-known Human Rights group, had been investigating the plight of the Turkish Minority in Greece. In August 1990, their findings were published in a report titled 'Destroying Ethnic Identity: Turks of Greece.' The report confirmed gross violations of the Human Rights of the Turkish minority by the Greek authorities. It says for instance, the Greek government recently destroyed an Islamic convent in Komotini. Such destruction, which reflects an attitude against the Muslim Turkish cultural heritage, is a violation of the Lausanne Convention. |1| HELSINKI WATCH: "PROBLEMS OF TURKS IN WESTERN THRACE CONTINUE" Ankara (A.A) In a 15-page report of the "Helsinki Watch" it is stated that the Turkish minority in Western Thrace is still faced with problems and stipulated that the discriminatory policy being implemented by the Greek Government be brought to an end. The report on Western Thrace emphasized that the Greek government should grant social and political rights to all the members of minorities that are equal to those enjoyed by Greek citizens and in addition they must recognize the existence of the "Turkish Minority" in Western Thrace and grant them the right to identify themselves as 'Turks'. NEWSPOT, May 1992 |2| GREECE ISOLATES WEST THRACE TURKS The Xanthi independent MP Ahmet Faikoglu said that the Greek state is trying to cut all contacts and relations of the Turkish minority with Turkey. Pointing out that while the Greek minority living in Istanbul is called "Greek" by ethnic definition, only the religion of the minority in Western Thrace is considered. In an interview with the Greek newspaper "Ethnos" he said: "I am a Greek citizen of Turkish origin. The individuals of the minority living in Western Trace are also Turkish." Emphasizing the education problem for the Turkish minority in Western Thrace Faikoglu said that according to an agreement signed in 1951 Greece must distribute textbooks printed in Turkey in Turkish minority schools in Western Thrace. Recalling his activities and those of Komotini independent MP Dr. SadIk Ahmet to defend the rights of the Turkish minority, Faikoglu said. "In fact we helped Greece. Because we prevented Greece, the cradle of democracy, from losing face before European countries by forcing the Greek government to recognize our legal rights." On Turco-Greek relations, he pointed out that both countries are predestined to live in peace for geographical and historical reasons and said that Turkey and Greece must resist the foreign powers who are trying to create a rift between them by cooperating, adding that in Turkey he observed that there was will to improve relations with Greece. NEWSPOT, January 1993 |3| MACEDONIAN HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS TO FACE TRIAL IN GREECE. Two ethnic Macedonian human rights activists will face trial in Athens for alleged crimes against the Greek state, according to a Court Summons (No. 5445) obtained by MILS. Hristos Sideropoulos and Tashko Bulev (or Anastasios Bulis) have been charged under Greek criminal law for making comments in an Athenian magazine. Sideropoulos and Bulev gave an interview to the Greek weekly magazine "ENA" on March 11, 1992, and said that they as Macedonians were denied basic human rights in Greece and would field an ethnic Macedonian candidate for the up-coming Greek general election. Bulev said in the interview: "I am not Greek, I am Macedonian." Sideropoulos said in the article that "Greece should recognise Macedonia. The allegations regarding territorial aspirations against Greece are tales... We are in a panic to secure the border, at a time when the borders and barriers within the EEC are falling." The main charge against the two, according to the court summons, was that "they have spread...intentionally false information which might create unrest and fear among the citizens, and might affect the public security or harm the international interests of the country (Greece)." The Greek state does not recognise the existence of a Macedonian ethnicity. There are believed to be between 350,000 to 1,000,000 ethnic Macedonians living within Greece, largely concentrated in the north. It is a crime against the Greek state if anyone declares themselves Macedonian. In 1913 Greece, Serbia-Yugoslavia and Bulgaria partioned Macedonia into three pieces. In 1919 Albania took 50 Macedonian villages. The part under Serbo-Yugoslav occupation broke away in 1991 as the independent Republic of Macedonia. There are 1.5 million Macedonians in the Republic; 500,000 in Bulgaria; 150,000 in Albania; and 300,000 in Serbia proper. Sideropoulos has been a long time campaigner for Macedonian human rights in Greece, and lost his job as a forestry worker a few years ago. He was even exiled to an obscure Greek island in the mediteranean. Only pressure from Amnesty International forced the Greek government to allow him to return to his home town of Florina (Lerin) in Northern Greece (Aegean Macedonia), where the majority of ethnic Macedonians live. Balkan watchers see the Sideropoulos affair as a show trial in which Greece is desperate to clamp down on internal dissent, especially when it comes to the issue of recognition for its northern neighbour, the Republic of Macedonia. Last year the State Department of the United States condemned Greece for its bad treatment of ethnic Macedonians and Turks (who largely live in Western Thrace). But it remains to be seen if the US government will do anything until the Presidential elections are over. ================================================================ M. I. L. S. ================================================================ 91, Rue du Craetveld - Kraatveldstraat 91 Orce Nikolov 28 1120 BRUSSELS, Belgium SKOPJE, Macedonia tel/fax: +32/2/268 18 48 tel/fax:+38 91 201 566 modem: +32/2/262 28 97 n.acc: Famibank-Citibank Belgium 954 8691431 92 Serdar Argic 'We closed the roads and mountain passes that might serve as ways of escape for the Turks and then proceeded in the work of extermination.' (Ohanus Appressian - 1919) 'In Soviet Armenia today there no longer exists a single Turkish soul.' (Sahak Melkonian - 1920)
17talk.politics.mideast
: >I want to upgrade my system and was thinking of buying Adcom seperates. : >I have heard from alot of people, though, that Adcom sounds great but : >that the components are made cheaply and therefore won't last very long. : >The time estimates I've heard are like only 3 or 4 years. Is this true? I own the Adcom 60W power amp. As far as I'm concerned, there's no amp which can touch it at the price range. The build quality is very impressive and is far superior to other amps in the price range. The whole amplifier is extremely solid with massive heat sinks and very solid casing. If you open the amp up, there are only very good quality components in and the amp seems to be designed extremely well. Perfect symmetry for both channels and TWO transformers - one for each channel. The binding posts on the back of the amplifier are virtually the same as those on the Classe model 70 ie. very good. I was also sceptical about the amps being built in the far-east or where-ever. But if you look in the amp and see what components they use and how it was designed, you can easily see why the amplifiers sound so brilliant. I cannot see why people say the amplifier won't last - not with those quality components inside. Sure the amp runs very fairly hot - but that's how you get an amp to sound incredibly good. My last point, I recently auditioned the Adcom preamp something like the 545 or something. It was two years old and it still sounded like new. If you build an amplifier decently, like the Adcom's, they will sound brilliant and last a long time - period. Just my thoughts, but then - I do own one of Adcom's amps. -- *********************************************************************** ** Alan Webber ** ** webb@itu1.sun.ac.za ** ** webb@itu2.sun.ac.za ** ** ** ** The path you tread is narrow and the drop is sheer and very high ** ** The ravens all are watching from a vantage point near by ** ** Apprehension creeping like a choo-train up your spine ** ** Will the tightrope reach the end; will the final couplet rhyme ** ***********************************************************************
12sci.electronics
In article <19687@pitt.UUCP> geb@cs.pitt.edu (Gordon Banks) writes: > >In article <1993Apr13.093300.29529@omen.UUCP> caf@omen.UUCP (Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX) writes: >> >>"Weight rebound" is a term used in the medical literature on >>obesity to denote weight regain beyond what was lost in a diet >>cycle. There are any number of terms which mean one thing to > >Can you provide a reference to substantiate that gaining back >the lost weight does not constitute "weight rebound" until it >exceeds the starting weight? Or is this oral tradition that >is shared only among you obesity researchers? Not one, but two: Obesity in Europe 88, proceedings of the 1st European Congress on Obesity Annals of NY Acad. Sci. 1987 >-- >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Gordon Banks N3JXP | "Skepticism is the chastity of the intellect, and >geb@cadre.dsl.pitt.edu | it is shameful to surrender it too soon." >---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX ...!tektronix!reed!omen!caf Author of YMODEM, ZMODEM, Professional-YAM, ZCOMM, and DSZ Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 17505-V NW Sauvie IS RD Portland OR 97231 503-621-3406
13sci.med
In article <1993Apr20.035607.26095@newshub.ariel.yorku.ca> cs902043@ariel.yorku.ca (SHAWN LUDDINGTON) writes: >How about changing team names! >Post your choices! > >Here I'll start: >How about the >Baltimore Baseblazers >San Francisco Quakes >Pittsburgh Sellouts> >Shawn - Go Rangers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >
9rec.sport.baseball
Note that if you get the external CD300 for your Centris or Q800 you will miss out on the sound mixing feature unless you are willing to run a wire from the motherboard sound input connector to the stereo output on the CD. Connecting to the sound input port on the back of the computer won't do unless you can live with mono.
4comp.sys.mac.hardware
bissda@saturn.wwc.edu (DAN LAWRENCE BISSELL) writes: > Niether was he a lunatic. Would more than an entire nation be drawn >to someone who was crazy. Find an encyclopedia. Volume H. Now look up Hitler, Adolf. He had many more people than just Germans enamoured with him. P. -- moorcockpratchettdenislearydelasoulu2iainmbanksneworderheathersbatmanpjorourke clive p a u l m o l o n e y Come, let us retract the foreskin of misconception james trinity college dublin and apply the wire brush of enlightenment - GeoffM brownbladerunnersugarcubeselectronicblaylockpowersspikeleekatebushhamcornpizza
0alt.atheism
I have a Northern Telecom disk array dated 1987 that has two 253MB drives units in it and I cannot get it formatted. I set the SCSI ID on 1 and my software recognizes the unit, but I cannot mount it or anything - do I have to use BOTH drives in the array? Any help with these drives or possibly newer software than what I'm using (FWB HDT1.0 and 1.1) will be greatly appreciated! -grey Grey Mull ****************************************** blaine@catt.ncsu.edu * Smoke pot, dodge the draft, cheat on * gbmull@eos.ncsu.edu * your wife, become President ... * NCSU CATT Program ************THE AMERICAN DREAM************
4comp.sys.mac.hardware
Phil G. Fraering writes: > Mark Brader writes: >> Thanks again. One final question. The name Gehrels wasn't known to >> me before this thread came up, but the May issue of Scientific American >> has an article about the "Inconstant Cosmos", with a photo of Neil >> Gehrels, project scientist for NASA's Compton Gamma Ray Observatory. >> Same person? > No. I estimate a 99 % probability the Gehrels referred to > is Thomas Gehrels of the Spacewatch project, Kitt Peak observatory. You may change that to 100% certainty. But to clarify, Spacewatch is a University of Arizona project using a telescope of the Steward Observatory located on Kitt Peak. It is not associated with Kitt Peak National Observatory, other than sharing a mountain.
14sci.space
-- Are the any Opel GT's out there? I'm wondering if there are enough to starting a mail list... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Matthew R. Singer MIT Lincoln Laboratory (617) 981-3771 244 Wood Street singer@ll.mit.edu Lexington, MA 02173 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
7rec.autos
In article <1qmcih$dhs@armory.centerline.com> jimf@centerline.com (Jim Frost) writes: >boyle@cactus.org (Craig Boyle) writes: >>The quality of autobahns is something of a myth. The road surface >>isn't much different to a typical TX freeway. They are better >>in terms of lighting, safety, signs, roadmarkings etc. > >They light the highways in Texas? Funny, everywhere else I've been >they only light 'em at junctions. Sorry, by "they" I meant autobahns, not US freeways. > >I won't even get into how much road markings vary between states and >localities except to say that there are some areas where markings are >essentially nonexistant. > >>>than most of the roads here. A dip in the asphalt that you test your >>>shocks on at 60 will kill you at 130. Don't get me wrong, I love to > >>It would have to be quite severe. I don't recall any US freeway, >>without road damage warnings, that i would regard as unsafe >>at 130 in any decent, well damped car. > >I suspect you have very limited experience -- US freeways vary >dramatically, particularly between states. I can name a number of >interstate highways in various parts of the country where 130 would be >very optimistic in any car. Well, I've driven in every state but Alaska, and drive about 60k per year. I take long cross country trips any chance I get - its fun for me and I can get reimbursment. My job allows me to drive rather than fly. Not to labor the point, but I've driven just about every freewayin the US, Germany, UK and France plus some in Mexico, which was surpisingly good. > >I'm not sure what you call "quite severe" in terms of road deviations >but I suspect every single bridge junction on I84 through CT would be >considered so. They're hard to take at 85mph. That's not the only >interstate I've seen with such deviations, but it's one I drive >frequently. Yes, but as a %age of the total freeway in the US? All you have to do in this case is mark the hazard, advising people to slow to 85 or so. > >Texas is pretty much an edge-case -- you can't assume that everywhere >has roads in such good condition, such flat terrain, and such Texas freeways are varied, sometimes a good surface. Mostly flat. But, I5 in CA is comparable and hilly. >wide-open spaces. It just ain't so. > Given the absence of other traffic and car built for 130 (e.g. 535) most US freeways are just fine. The problem is other road users and cops. >jim frost >jimf@centerline.com Craig
7rec.autos
In article <1993Apr21.090638.6253@titan.ksc.nasa.gov> rodger-scoggin@ksc.nasa.gov (Rodger C. Scoggin) writes: >In article <DZVB3B6w164w@cellar.org>, techie@cellar.org (William A Bacon) says: >> >>FURY OF MOTHER NATURE >> >>Man's contribution to environmental "pollution" are paltry compared to those >>of nature. In her exceptional book TRASHING THE PLANET, former Atomic Energy >>Commision Chairman Dr. Dixie Lee Ray notes based on the available data, > >Atomic Energy Commision - Hmm, they would say this. > I'm no defender of the AEC, but it is worth noting that it is unfair to tar that organization with the decidedly minority scientific views of its former chairperson and one term Washington governor, Dr. Dixie Lee Ray. Dr. Ray's political agenda is well-known and documented. Likewise, her lack of objectivity in analysing scientific data is well-known. jsh -- Steve Hendricks | DOMAIN: steveh@thor.ISC-BR.COM "One thing about data, it sure does cut| UUCP: ...!uunet!isc-br!thor!steveh the bulls**t." - R. Hofferbert | Ma Bell: 509 838-8826
18talk.politics.misc
In article <1993Apr19.121925.14451@microware.com>, jejones@microware.com (James Jones) writes: |> In article <1993Apr15.164940.11632@mercury.unt.edu> Sean McMains <mcmains@unt.edu> writes: |> >In article <1993Apr15.144843.19549@rchland.ibm.com> Ricardo Hernandez |> >Muchado, ricardo@rchland.vnet.ibm.com writes: |> >> And CD-I's CPU doesn't help much either. I understand it is |> >>a 68070 (supposedly a variation of a 68000/68010) running at something |> >>like 7Mhz. With this speed, you *truly* need sprites. |> > |> >Wow! A 68070! I'd be very interested to get my hands on one of these, |> >especially considering the fact that Motorola has not yet released the |> >68060, which is supposedly the next in the 680x0 lineup. 8-D |> |> Don't get too excited; Signetics, not Motorola, gave the 68070 its number. |> The 68070, if I understand rightly, uses the 68000 instruction set, and has |> an on-chip serial port and DMA. (It will run at up to 15 MHz--I'm typing |> at a computer using a 68070 running at that rate, so I know that it can |> do so--so I seriously doubt the clock rate that ricardo@rchland.vnet.ibm.com |> claims.) |> |> James Jones Just because the 68070 can run upto 15Mhz doesn't mean the CD-I is running at that speed. I said -> I understand it is a 68070 running at something like 7Mhz. I am not sure, but I think I read this a long time ago. Anyway, still with 15Mhz, you need sprites for a lot of tricks for making cool awesome games (read psygnosis). -------------------------------------- Raist New A1200 owner 320<->1280 in x, 200<->600 in y in 256,000+ colors from a 24-bit palette. **I LOVE IT!**<- New Low Fat .sig *don't e-mail me* -> I don't have a valid address nor can I send e-mail
1comp.graphics
In article <1993Apr14.200259.20419@microsoft.com>, iank@microsoft.com (Ian Kennedy) writes... (stephen) wrote: >>Correction to my prior post, proper citation is: >> >> Isaiah 30:26 -- Moreover the light of the moon shall >> be as the light of the sun, and the light of the >> sun shall be sevenfold, as the light of seven days, >> in the day that the LORD bindeth up the breach of >> his people, and healeth the stroke of their wound. > >So we have to wait for the sun to nova? More along the lines of Hebrews 12:25-29, I reckon... See that you refuse not him that speaks. For if they escaped not who refused him that spake on earth, much more shall not we escape, if we turn away from him that speaks from heaven: Whose voice then shook the earth: but now he has promised, saying, Yet once more I shake not the earth only, but also heaven. And this word, Yet once more, signifies the removing of those things that are shaken, as of things that are made, that those things which cannot be shaken may remain. Wherefore we receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear: For our God is a consuming fire. Or 2nd Thessalonians 1:7-10... And to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels, In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power; When he shall come to be glorified in his saints, and to be admired in all them that believe (because our testimony among you was believed) in that day. Kinda gives Flaming a whole new meaning, I reckon. - < > - The impression I got from talking with Livingston was that the coming of the Lord, power-wise, is going to be something that those who are unprepared can't handle -- kinda like overloading a fuse -- due to guilt. Somehow it seems to also apply to the entire physical world as we know it. LF suggests that God doesn't want that and has sent Koresh as a reminder. Seems that those who have been purified through salvation, or that those protected by the Seals, will be the ones who survive. And no -- I don't have a good idea yet what "being shielded by the seals" actually involves or how exactly it relates to salvation. (Other than it involves the marriage of the Bridegroom and the Bride... for those of you Biblical well versed.) - < > - Me personally, I'm totally 100% dependent on God through Christ, so if God wants me to understand, good. If not, also good. If God wants to save me, or dispose of me, that's great either way. Being born in the Spirit, means being part of the Body of Christ (Ephesians 2), so who and what I was, matters little. * What's important is loving GOD * Come Nova, Nuke, or Apocalypse -- who cares? Satan might even be able to pull off a pretty convincing fake. Big deal. Not worth fearing or worrying about though, not before: -* The Greater Glory of GOD *- Maybe Koresh is right, maybe he isn't, and it should be interesting to see the new message (or prophecy). The tour of the Bible I've taken in studying the passages he points to in the 3-02 text, has been most re- warding. But the test of prophecy is still the fruit it bears -- which is not yet clear. Much much more important is "Charity" -- which by definition *is* -- Love for GOD (I hope Dear Reader, you've taken all this as an expression of faith, and not a statement of mere fact. Seems many folks get real upset at reminders. ;-) | -- J -- | | stephen
19talk.religion.misc
In article <1r7h1r$o7p@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> ascott@tartarus.uwa.edu.au (Andrew Scott) writes: >I would expect that CD-ROM software would not even need copy protection. >As the program on a CD-ROM would not fit onto a hard-drive, and it is >impossible for the average (and even not-so-average) user to write to a >CD-ROM, copies of the software (that still work) could never be made. > >Hmmm.. now that I think about it.. with a creative TSR, maybe >disk-swapping could be used to simulate files on a single disk. You >would need a tonne of disks though. > There are many programs on CD-ROM that fit on a harddisk, not all software is that big (but we're getting there :-)). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Guido Klemans Internet: rcstage1@urc.tue.nl valid until 16 may 1993 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Listen very carefully, I will say this only ones.' Michelle of the resitance -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12sci.electronics
Anyone who really believes that the Caps can beat the Pens are kidding themselves. The Pens may not loose one game in the playoffs. Geoff Filinuk Flyers Fan
10rec.sport.hockey
In article <C5quI4.4CF@spk.hp.com> borowski@spk.hp.com (Don T. Borowski) writes: > Dean Anneser (anneser@pwa-b.uucp) wrote: > : My 9 yr old son has signed up to do a science report on batteries. I was > : wondering if anyone could provide me with some information as to how to > : construct a home-built battery. In my grade school days, I remember (snip!) I haven't been following this, so I'm sorry if somebody already mentioned this, but you could grab a lemon (I think potatoes work too, but I'm not sure), a strip of copper, and a strip of zinc (I think you can get the metal in a hardware store or hobby shop, maybe??). Stick the strips in the lemon (so they don't touch!) and you'll get a measurable voltage (not a lot, but, hey, it's a lemon :-) ). As I recall we had to hook something like ten of these things to get an appreciable amount of current, because of the mondo internal resistance, but if you just need a demo you might get it to run a tiny fan or something! :-) Mark S. Underwood EE Student, University of Kentucky Lab Assistant, Boyd Hall Microlab (a tiny little division of UK Library Microlabs) E-Mail: msunde01@mik.uky.edu
12sci.electronics
I am going to stop reading the homosexuality posts, at least for a while, because of the repeated seemingly personal attacks on me via post/e-mail(mainly e-mail). If anyone has a specific comment, suggestion, and/or note that does not contain any name calling, etc. that they would like for me to read, send it to me via e-mail. I would like a copy of file mentioned by the moderator ragarding the exergetical issue of it. I attempted to get it via ftp but was unable. In Christ's Love, Bryan
15soc.religion.christian
I am curious if anyone in net-land has spent any time at any of the L'Abri houses throughout the world and what the experience was like, how it affected you, etc. Especially interesting would be experiences at the original L'Abri in Switzerland and personal interactions with Francis and/or Edith Schaeffer. Tom Milligan
15soc.religion.christian
Brad Templeton (brad@clarinet.com) wrote: : It occurs to me that if they get a wiretap order on you, and the escrow : houses release your code to the cops, your code is now no longer secure. : : It's in the hands of cops, and while I am sure most of the time they are : good, their security will not be as good as the escrow houses. : : : What this effectively means is that if they perform a wiretap on you, : at the end of the wiretap, they should be obligated to inform you that : a tap was performed, and replace (for free) the clipper chip in your : cellular phone so that it is once again a code known only to the : escrow houses. Getting the court order to reveal the key *also* makes decipherable all *past* conversations (which may be on tape, or disk, or whatver), as I understand the proposal. I could be wrong, but I've seen no mention of "session keys" being the escrowed entities. As the EFF noted, this raises further issues about the fruits of one bust leading to incrimination in other areas. But is it any worse than the current unsecure system? It becomes much worse, of course, if the government then uses this "Clinton Clipper" to argue for restrictions on unapproved encryption. (This is the main concern of most of us, I think. The camel's nose in the tent, etc.) And it may also become much worse if the ostensible security is increased, thus allowing greater access to "central office" records by the government (the conversations being encrypted, who will object to letting the government have access to them, perhaps even automatically archiving large fractions...). This was one of the main objections to the S.266 proposal, that it would force telecom suppliers to provide easy access for the government. One the government has had access to months or years of your encrypted conversations, now all it takes is one misstep, one violation that gets them the paperwork needed to decrypt *all* of them! Do we want anyone to have this kind of power? -Tim May, whose sig block may get him busted in the New Regime -- .......................................................................... Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay@netcom.com | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero 408-688-5409 | knowledge, reputations, information markets, W.A.S.T.E.: Aptos, CA | black markets, collapse of governments. Higher Power: 2^756839 | Public Key: PGP and MailSafe available.
11sci.crypt
emarsh@hernes-sun.Eng.Sun.COM (Eric Marsh) writes: > BTW, the parallel universe approach implys an element of mind in the > very physical reality of the universe. This sounds interesting... but what exactly do you mean? > eric Nanci ......................................................................... If you know (and are SURE of) the author of this quote, please send me email (nm0w+@andrew.cmu.edu): The fate of the country does not depend on what kind of paper you drop into the ballot box once a year, but on what kind of man you drop from your chamber into the street every morning.
19talk.religion.misc
This article was probably generated by a buggy news reader.
1comp.graphics
In article <1993Mar26.185117.21400@cs.rochester.edu> fulk@cs.rochester.edu (Mark Fulk) writes: >In article <33587@castle.ed.ac.uk> hrvoje@castle.ed.ac.uk (H Hecimovic) writes: >compensation? Or are lesions localized to the SC too rare to be able >to tell? Extremely rare in humans. Usually so much else is involved you'd just have a mess to sort out. Birds do all vision in the tectum, don't they? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Banks N3JXP | "Skepticism is the chastity of the intellect, and geb@cadre.dsl.pitt.edu | it is shameful to surrender it too soon." ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
13sci.med
In article <mjones.735273896@fenway> mjones@donald.aix.kingston.ibm.com writes: >fierkelab@bchm.biochem.duke.edu (Eric Roush) writes: >>>(Quick: name a >>>light-hitting black outfielder or 1B who lasted 10+ years in the bigs. >>>I bet you can name two dozen white ones.) >>Otis Nixon. Stole 300 bases. (Ok, he's still light-hitting, but baseball managers don't think so, they think he, like Omar Moreno before him, is a perfect leadoff man. Awesome defense.) >>Darnell Coles He's still around because of his 1986, when he hit 20 HR. >>Henry Cotto Hasn't played 10+ years in the bigs. Wasn't a full-time major-leaguer until 1988. >Manny Mota. Consistent .300 hitter. >Billy Hatcher We'll see if he's still around in 1994 for his tenth year. >Herm Winningham. Same goes for Herm. >Lonnie Smith (not light hitting, but a horror in the field) Doesn't count then. >Gary Redus Redus is hardly light-hitting, plus he stole 300 bases. Close to 800 OPS career against LHP. >Dion James We'll see if he's still around in 1995 to qualify. >Daryl Boston Slugged .416 to .440 for three straight years in one of the worst hitters' parks in the NL. He's going to be one of Colorado's better players this year. Plus, to make ten you have to count all the time he spent in Denver and Buffalo and Hawaii while with the White Sox. >Vince Coleman (yeah, he's finally started to have a decent OBP) Coleman, assuming he makes it to 1994, was never perceived as being weak offensively, though of course he was. Led NL in SB his first six years in the majors. >Cecil Espy We'll see if he's still around in 1997. >Willie Wilson Wilson has always been overrated, but hit .300 five times in a six-year stretch and led the league in triples five times. But we can count him if he's still playing in 1994, though it'll be because he's Otis Nixon deluxe with slightly worse defense. >Gary Pettis Okay, if he's in the league this year, he can count, though he's also in the majors because of Otis Nixon syndrome. >Milt Thompson He's not spectacular, but he's neither light-hitting nor a ten-year man. >Gary Varsho Halfway there, and unlikely to make it 3/4 of the way there. >OK, I admit to taking a quick browse through the Major League Handbook, but >only after the first 7 or 8. Oh, and there's the all-time light-hitting >black outfielder: Lou Brock. Look it up. And Curt Flood. Cesar Geronimo. >Cesar Cedeno. Brock suffered from Otis Nixon disease, but he wasn't perceived as light-hitting. Neither was Curt Flood. Cesar Cedeno was *not* light- hitting. >>Note: These guys may not have reached 10 years yet, but they've got >>to be close. > >Likewise for my list. Oh, and a prediction: Milt Cuyler. He'll have to steal a lot more bases. -- ted frank | thf2@kimbark.uchicago.edu | I'm sorry, the card says "Moops." the u of c law school | standard disclaimers |
9rec.sport.baseball
genetic+@pitt.edu (David M. Tate) writes: >dwarner@journalism.indiana.edu said: >>I only caught the tail end of this one on ESPN. Does anyone have a report? >>(Look at all that Teal!!!! BLEAH!!!!!!!!!) >Maybe it's just me, but the combination of those *young* faces peeking out >from under oversized aqua helmets screams "Little League" in every fibre of >my being... Hmm, it seems the Little Leaguers didn't do too badly against Hershiser, Strawberry, E. Davis, and the rest of the Dodgers yesterday ... :-) ----- Eric Smith erics@netcom.com erics@infoserv.com CI$: 70262,3610
9rec.sport.baseball
Actually they synth used in "JUMP" was an Oberheim. Watch the video....... Kevin
6misc.forsale
My friend has a Macintosh IIfx on which he is running System 6.0.7 (not enough memory yet to run Sys7 adequately), and he noticed that when he tries to use Multifinder on this machine, the machine will beep every few seconds incessantly, nonstop. Now, this friend has a tendency to "install" things on his machine rather haphazardly, but he *did* rebuild his System from scratch and it still occurs. Does this problem sound familiar at all to anyone? For all I know the problem is caused by something really obscure but if this is a known simple thing (yeah, right...) that someone is familiar with (like "System 6.0.7 Multifinder doesn't run on a Mac IIfx"), or if someone here knows what he should be looking for, please send e-mail either to me or to him (smh@vaxf.acdnj.itt.com). Thanx in advance. -- "Digging in the dirt, stay with me I need support Digging in the dirt, find the places I got hurt Rich Rosen Open up the places I got hurt..." rlr@panix.com
4comp.sys.mac.hardware
In article <1r0rslINNnv2@senator-bedfellow.MIT.EDU> jfc@athena.mit.edu (John F Carr) writes: > >I'm running Linux on an 80486 EISA system, and I'm having what I think are >hardware problems. It could be software, but I don't see why I'd be the >only one having trouble. I'd like some advice on how best to debug this. > >The symptom: when I try to build gcc, I get unpredictable and unrepeatable >results. Sometimes a .o file is not in valid a.out format. Recompiling the >file gives me a valid binary. Sometimes the compiler aborts or dumps core, >but works fine when run again with the same input. Compiling the same >source files with the same arguments gives slight differences in a few >object files. (Note that Linux, unlike many other systems, does not put >timestamps in object files so compiling twice should give bit-identical >results.) > >I also have occasional filesystem corruption on my SCSI drive, but that >could be caused by using development software. It could also be related to >my problems compiling. The compile problems are not caused by disk >problems: I get the same results whether I do my work on an IDE or SCSI >disk. > >I've set the memory speed and cache write speed to the recommended values. Recommended for what, DOS? That is a junk. > >I suspect the external cache, but I have no real evidence for this. > >The motherboard is a NICE Super-EISA with 256 KB write-back cache and a DX/2 >66 Mhz processor. > >What I'm looking for: > > . A system test program to run under DOS or Linux Linux + gcc. Fire up gcc to compile libc and kernel at the same time running X11R5. > > . Suggestions about the cause of the problem Bad memory, bad motherboard, bad cache. > > . Suggestions about how to debug the problem > change wait state of RAM. turn off turbo. change bus speed swap RAM. H.J.
3comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
Hi, I'm looking for the 3-D studio driver for the Oak card with 1 M of RAM. This would be GREATLY (and I mean that) appreciated Maybe I should have just gotten a more well know card. thanks seth@acpub.duke.edu
1comp.graphics
A relative of mine was recently diagnosed with colon cancer. I would like to know the best source of survival statistics for this disease when discovered at its various stages. I would prefer to be directed to a recent source of this data, rather than receive the data itself. Thank you, **************************************************************************** * Barry Rein * * brein@jplpost.jpl.nasa.gov * **************************************************************************** * No clever comment. * ****************************************************************************
13sci.med
I have one of the original Powerbook 170's (with 4Mb of Ram) and find that 4Mb is a drag when trying to do my work. So, what is the best way to get the maximum RAM for this unit, and what's it going to cost me? I'm hoping I can get the latest and best info from real users by posting to this group. Thanks in advance, --Bill
4comp.sys.mac.hardware
(This is a continuation of an earlier post) mls@panix.com (Michael Siemon) writes: >For those Christians who *do* think that *some* parts of Leviticus can >be "law" for Christians (while others are not even to be thought about) >it is incumbent on you *in every case, handled on its own merits* to >determine why you "pick" one and ignore another. I frankly think the >whole effort misguided. Reread Paul: "No doubt I am free to do anything." >But Christians have a criterion to use for making our judgments on this, >the Great Commandment of love for God and neighbor. If you cannot go >through Leviticus and decide each "command" there on that basis, then >your own arbitrary selection from it is simply idiosyncracy. In this >context, it is remarkably offensive to say: > >>I notice that the verse forbidding bestiality immediately follows the >>verse prohibiting what appears to be homosexual intercourse. (I am sorry you found this offensive. It was not my intent to offend. I was leading up to another point, which I discuss in more detail below.) >Well, la-ti-da. So what? This is almost as slimey an argument as the >one that homosexuality == rape. I know of no one who argues seriously >(though one can always find jokers) in "defense" of bestiality. It is >absolutely irrelevant and incomparable to the issues gay Christians *do* >raise (which concern sexual activity within committed, consensual human >adult realtionships), so that your bringing it up is no more relevant >than the laws of kashrut. If you cannot address the actual issues, you >are being bloody dishonest in trailing this red herring in front of the >world. If *you* want to address bestiality, that is YOUR business, not >mine. And attempting to torpedo a serious issue by using what is in >our culture a ridiculous joke shows that you have no interest in hearing >us as human beings. You want to dismiss us, and use the sleaziest means >you can think of to do so. I can see you have a revulsion for bestiality that far exceeds my distaste for homosexuality. Certainly if I spoke about homosexuality the way you speak of bestiality, nobody would have any trouble labelling me a homophobe. Let me ask this gently: why are you so judgemental of other people's sexual preferences? What happened to "No doubt I am free to do anything"? I think you have a serious double standard here. When you describe a comparison between homosexuality and bestiality as "slimey" and "sleazy", you are making an implicit judgement that bestiality is perverted, sinful, disgusting, unnatural--in short, all the things that society once thought about homosexuality. Not all people share your view. You claim not to know any sincere zoophiles, but this does not mean that they do not exist. They even have their own newsgroup: alt.sex.bestiality. Are you going to accuse them all of being mere "jokers"? I notice you deleted the main point of my comment: the fact that the only Biblical condemnations of bestiality occur in connection with the Levitical prohibitions against homosexuality. While there are some New Testament passages that can arguably be taken as condemning homosexuality, there are none that condemn bestiality. One of your main points seems to be that Christian homosexuality is acceptable due to the lack of any "clear" New Testament statements against it; if this is a valid argument, then should not Christian zoophilia be made that much more acceptable by the fact that the New Testament makes no reference, clear or unclear, to the subject at all? I am quite serious here. If I am going to accept homosexuality as Biblically acceptable on the basis of your arguments, then I am going to be fair and apply the same standards to everyone else's declared sexual preferences as well. If the arguments you make for homosexuality can be applied to other sexual preferences as well, I'm going to apply them and see what comes up. I'm not trying to "torpedo a serious issue" by using what you label "a ridiculous joke". I posted a question about how we should interpret Biblical guidelines for Christian sexuality, and I don't think such a question is "irrelevant" in a group called "soc.religion.christian". The Bible discusses homosexuality and bestiality together in the same context, and therefore I feel I have a good precedent for doing the same. >Jesus and Paul both expound, very explictly and in considerable length, >the central linch-pin of Christian moral thought: we are required to >love one another, and ALL else depends on that. Gay and lesbian Christ- >ians challenge you to address the issue on those terms -- and all we get >in return are cheap debate tricks attempting to side-track the issues. I don't know whether it makes any difference, but for the record, this is not a side issue for me. I believe loving one another includes not encouraging people to defile themselves, therefore it is of high importance to determine whether God regards certain sexual acts as defiling. I can read in the New Testament that "God has joined together" heterosexual couples, and that the marriage bed is undefiled. I can read in the Old Testament that homosexual intercourse and bestiality defile a person whether or not that person is under the Law. If gay Christians can validly put aside the Old Testament standards of defilement, then I want to know so that I can fairly apply it to all the sexual practices that defiled a person in the old days. I don't think it's right to take just bits and pieces of the Law and try and apply them to Christians today, e.g. bestiality still defiles you but homosexuality doesn't. That was pretty much what you said earlier, right? You used different examples, but I think you said essentially the same thing about it being wrong to apply only certain parts of the Law to Christians. >Christians, no doubt very sincere ones, keep showing up here and in every >corner of USENET and the world, and ALL they ever do is spout these same >old verses (which they obviously have never thought about, maybe never >even read), in TOTAL ignorance of the issues raised, slandering us with >the vilest charges of child abuse or whatever their perfervid minds can >manage to conjure up, tossing out red herrings with (they suppose) great >emotional force to cause readers to dismiss our witness without even >taking the trouble to find out what it is. It was not my intent to stir up such an emotional reaction. I personally don't get all that upset discussing alternatives to the monogamous heterosexual orientation; I'm afraid I naively assumed that others would have a similar attitude. Please note that I have never intended to equate homosexuality with child abuse. I have merely noted that, for all the lack of "clear" NT condemnation of homosexuality, there is an even greater lack of NT condemnation (or even mention) of bestiality, a practice which a number of people (e.g. on alt.sex.bestiality) consider to be their true sexual orientation. >Such behavior should shame anyone who claims to have seen Truth in Christ. >WHY, for God's precious sake, do you people quote irrelevant verses to >condemn people you don't know and won't even take the trouble to LISTEN >to BEFORE you start your condemnations? Is that loving your neighbor? >God forbid! Is THAT how you obey the repeated commands to NOT judge or >condemn others? Christ and Paul spend ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE more time in >insisting on this than the half-dozen obscure words in Paul that you are >SO bloody ready to take as license to do what God tells you NOT to do. > >Why, for God's sake? > [quote from John 3:17ff omitted for brevity] This is an excellent question, and I pray that you will not treat it as a mere rhetorical question, but will genuinely seek to discover and understand the answer. I recommend you begin with a little introspection into why you yourself have much the same attitude towards zoophilia. Why do you find bestiality so repugnant that you regard it as slanderous to even mention in connection with other alternative sexual orientations? Why do you not apply all the same verses about love and tolerance to zoophiles the way you apply them to homosexuals? Is it because you automatically experience a subjective feeling of revulsion at the thought? A lot of people have the same experience at the thought of homosexual intercourse. Is it because you regard the practice as socially unacceptable? A lot of people regard homosexuality as socially unacceptable. Do you feel that it violates the traditional Judeo-Christian standard of sexual morality? Many people feel that homosexuality does. Do you feel the Bible condemns it? Many people think the Bible says more to condemn homosexuality than it does to condemn bestiality. Why then do you think comparing bestiality with homosexuality is insulting to homosexuality? If you can honestly answer this question, you will have come a long way towards understanding why many people feel the same way about homosexuality as you feel about bestiality. Also please note that I am not in any sense condemning *people*. I am merely pointing out that when I read the Bible I see certain sexual *practices* that the Bible appears to condemn, e.g. sex outside of marriage. When I say I think adultery and pre-marital sex are sinful, do you take that as me failing to love my neighbor? When you treat bestiality as something disgusting and unmentionable, are you disobeying "repeated orders not to judge or condemn others"? When you say other Christians are guilty of sinning by condemning you and judging you, are you by that accusation making yourself guilty of the same offense? Or are you and I both simply taking note about *practices* the Bible brands as sinful, and leaving the judgement of the *people* up to God? >For long ages, we (many of us) have been confused by evil counsel from >evil men and told that if we came to the light we would be shamed and >rejected. Some of us despaired and took to courses that probably *do* >show a sinful shunning of God's light. Blessed are those whose spirits >have been crushed by the self-righteous; they shall be justified. > >However, we have seen the Truth, and the Truth is the light of humanity; >and we now know that it is not WE who fear the light, but our enemies who >fear the light of our witness and will do everything they can to shadow >it with the darkness of false witness against us. >-- >Michael L. Siemon I say "You are gods, sons of the >mls@panix.com Most High, all of you; nevertheless > - or - you shall die like men, and fall >mls@ulysses.att..com like any prince." Psalm 82:6-7 I'm not sure what you mean by the above two paragraphs. If you mean that Jesus is the Truth, and that He accepts sinners, and does not reject them, then I agree. If we were not sinners, then we would not *need* a Savior. Our salvation in Christ, however, does not mean that sin is now irrelevant for us, and we can now do whatever we want. Nor does Christ's grace mean that those who refer to sin as "sin" are being judgemental or intolerant. I am speaking in general terms here, not specifically about homosexuality. If the Bible calls something "sin", then it is not unreasonable for Christians to call it sin too. As applied to Christian homosexuality, I think the only definitive authority on Christian sexuality is the Bible. If you make a list of everything the Bible says on the subject of homosexual intercourse, I think you will find that every verse on the list is negative and condemning at worst, and "unclear" at best. The most pro-gay statement you could make about the list is that there is some dispute about the New Testament verses which many people interpret as condemning homosexual intercourse. That is, from a gay perspective, the most positive thing you can say about the Bible's treatment of homosexuality is that some verses fail to clearly condemn it. That's it. Jesus declared all foods clean, the council at Jerusalem declared that Gentiles were not required to keep the ritual Law, but nobody ever reclassified homosexual intercourse from being an abomination deserving of death to being an accepted Christian practice. You have verses describing homosexual intercourse as an abomination that defiles both Jews under the Law and Gentiles not under the Law, and you have some verses which are at best "not clear" but which some people believe *are* clear in their condemnation of homosexual behavior, and that's the sum total of what the Bible says about same-sex intercourse. I can appreciate (from personal experience) your desire to have everything simple, cut-and-dried, black-and-white, what-I-want- is-ok, and those-who-oppose-me-are-wicked. However, I do not think the Bible makes your case as definitively as you would like it to. In fact, I don't believe it says anything positive about your case at all. Yes, I know the verses about loving one another, and not judging one another, but that's not really the issue, is it? You know and admit that there are still things that are sinful for Christians to do, since you say it is wrong for Christians to condemn you. Therefore, the issue is whether the Bible says homosexual intercourse is a sin. Even if you do challenge the clarity of the New Testament verses, you are still left with the fact that the only thing the Bible does say clearly about homosexual intercourse is that it is an abomination that defiles both those who are under the law and those who are not. - Mark [Actually I don't think the reaction to the comparision with bestiality is based on bestialophobia. I think what he regards as slimey is the rhetorical approach of connecting homosexuality and bestiality. Most people who accept homosexuality take a radical approach to the Law. They regard all of Lev as not binding on Christians. The argument is that there's no way in the text to separate bestiality, homosexuality, and wearing mixed fabrics. This does not mean that such people have no limits on their conduct, nor does it mean that they accept bestiality. It simply means that their sexual ethics does not come from the Law, and particularly not from Lev. --clh]
15soc.religion.christian
In <C4v13w.Dup@apollo.hp.com> nelson_p@apollo.hp.com (Peter Nelson) writes: >In article <bob1.733696161@cos> bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw) writes: >>In <C4ruo8.77r@apollo.hp.com> nelson_p@apollo.hp.com (Peter Nelson) writes: >>> Norway (where you appear to be posting from) is just such a >>> place, although it has always escaped my understanding just >>> what the appeal, to allegedly rational people, of such a >>> scheme might be. What gives King Olav V (or whoever it is >>> now - my atlas is from 1987) the right to any special legal >>> status or title based on a mere accident of birth? >> >>To begin with, it's quite inexpensive compared to here, what with our >>having six former presidents still alive, drawing pensions, expense >>accounts, and secret service protection. > Maybe so, but they were, after all, President. In the corporate > world it's SOP for retiring senior executives to be given nice > pensions, etc. The point is that they performed a service and > this is part of the compensation package. The only "service" > royals have to perform for their free ride is being born. We might be better off had some of our former presidents done nothing. >---peter >PS - . . . which is not to say that some of our presidents have > not provided a service for the country too dissimilar from what > occurs when a bull "services" a cow (for those of you familiar > with cattle breeding). >
18talk.politics.misc
Greetings all, Can anyone let me know status of UK law about riding motorcycles. I used to ride one about 12 years ago and never took my DOT test ( One of a whole list of things I wished I had done when I was young),but I have passed my car driving test. I now travel from Littlehampton to Brighton every day and I'm getting PISSED off with the traffic/road works. I thinking about getting a 100cc bike ( Don't Laugh ) just to get "Streetwise" and to take my test, then to get a bigger one ( 400 to 600 cc ). Now I have been told I don't have to do the CBT but what will I have to do to get a full licence ? Thanks in advanced Leigh -- ******************************************************************************* * * * Leigh Dodd * * Engineering and Applied Science (EaPS) * * University of Sussex, * * Brighton BN1 9QH, UK * * phone: 44 273 606755 Ext. 2616 * * fax: 44 273 678399 * * * * JANET: leighd@uk.ac.susx.eaps * * INTERNET: leighd@eaps.susx.ac.uk * * * *******************************************************************************
8rec.motorcycles
In article <C6vnMv.9G6@rjck.uucp> rob@rjck.uucp (Robert J.C. Kyanko) writes: I need help in creating my 4x4 perspective matrix. I'd like to use this for transforming x, y, z, w in some texture mapping code I got from Graphics Gems I. I have many books which talk about this, but none of them in simple plain english. If you have Graphics Gems I, I'm talking about page 678. I'd like to have a perspective matrix that handles different field-of-views and aspect of course. Thank's for your help. ca2 = cos(alpha / 2) Horizontal sa2 = sin(alpha / 2) cb2 = cos(beta / 2) Vertical sb2 = sin(beta 7 2) Zf = Far clipping value Zn = Near clipping value Matrix: [[ca2/sa2 0 0 0] [0 cb2/sb2 0 0] [0 0 Zf/(Zf-Zn) 1] [0 0 -Zn*Zf/(Zf-Zn) 0]] -- ____ ___ Geir Atle Storhaug / ____/\ (__ Geir.A.Storhaug@vm.ffi.no \___// \___) Phone: +47 63 807658 (office) +47 63 838987 (home)
1comp.graphics
My girlfriend is a smoker. She has been addicted to it for quite some time. She has been tried a couple of times, but then always get back to it. Her background is non-Christian, but she's interested in Christianity. I'm a Christian and non-smoker. I would like to collect any personal stories from Christians who managed to quit. I hope that this will encourage her to keep on trying. If anybody ever had a similar problem or knows a good book on it, pls reply by email. I appreciate any kinds of helps. Thanks a lot. ======================================================================= Simon Darjadi Wibowo Telp : (65)7726863 Dept. of EE, Nat'l Univ. Of S'pore Fax : (65)7773117 Singapore 0511 Internet : eledw@nuscc.nus.sg
15soc.religion.christian
In article <1993Apr21.045548.17418@news.cs.brandeis.edu>, st922957@pip.cc.brandeis.edu (Arnold Schwarzenweisengreenbluenbraunenburger) says: > >Y'know, when the right to bear arms was "invented", all we had to worry >about was the shotgun and pistol. Now, we have to worry about drive-bys >with Uzis sparaying the entire neighborhood with bullets. > >Just because someting was good once, does not mean it will be forever. Quite so. All automobiles should be banned immediately.
19talk.religion.misc
cramer@optilink.COM (Clayton Cramer) writes: > >Unless, of course, the problem is that homosexuality is a form >of mental disorder, caused by childhood sexual abuse, as a number of >recent works suggest. Which number is that? Zero? Please present "a number" of authoritative works which "suggest" that "homosexuality is a form of mental disorder, caused by childhood sexual abuse." Don't present your own biased conclusions, based on a collage of tidbits you've extracted from a few hours' research, as the conclusions of people who study mental disease and sexual abuse professionally. -- Jamie McCarthy Internet: k044477@kzoo.edu AppleLink: j.mccarthy
18talk.politics.misc
In article <1ri5pk$2f0@cat.cis.Brown.EDU> dzk@cs.brown.edu (Danny Keren) writes: >Can someone elaborate a little on what this "Libertarian" movement is? I >am not going to draw conclusions from a small sample, but so far I >recall two self-described "Libertarians" posting here. Both seems to be: > >1) Incredibly ignorant. >2) Incredibly arrogant. >3) All they want is to get people angry. >4) Posses a lousy sense of humor. >5) write incoherently and jump from topic to topic without any logical > connection between topics. >6) Describe themselves as intelligent and knowledgeable, although everything > in their posters points to the opposite. >7) Very childish. > >Is this some campaign to smear this Libertarian party or what? Wow, hang on a second. The libertarian party stands for personal freedom, lassez-faire economics and minimal government. Whoever is describing the self as a Libertarian (maybe you were refering to the posters who call themselves civil libertarians) are not talking at all about Libertarian philosophy. -Adam Schwartz (libertarian)
17talk.politics.mideast
In a previous article, mhsu@lonestar.utsa.edu (Melinda . Hsu) says: > >Well the argument usually stops right there. In the end, >aren't we all just kids, groping for the truth? If so, do we have >the authority to declare all other beliefs besides our own as >false? > If I don't think my belief is right and everyone else's belief is wrong, then I don't have a belief. This is simply what belief means. Where does the authority for a belief come from? Nowhere, for a belief is itself authoratative. If I produce authority for a belief, where will I find authority for my belief in the legitimacy of the authority. In short, the mind has to start somewhere. (By the way, the majority of Christians, i.e. Catholics, believe in the authority of the Church, and derive the authority of the Bible from its acceptance by the Church.) -- ============================================================================== Mark Baker | "The task ... is not to cut down jungles, but aa888@Freenet.carleton.ca | to irrigate deserts." -- C. S. Lewis ==============================================================================
15soc.religion.christian
Years ago I grabbed the following from the net - maybe from this newsgroup. Does anyone know of a source for whether this is an accurate quote? Thanks! Bartletts leaves out the homosexual lines, but they were one of the groups the Nazis tried to exterminate. === In Germany, they first came for the communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a communist. Then they came for the jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the homosexuals, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a homosexual. Then they came for the catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a protestant. Then they came for me --- but by that time there was no one left to speak up. -- Pastor Martin Neimoller
15soc.religion.christian
Since Image Writer LQ was discontinued, there is no Apple Talk printer with 11"*15" continous paper printer. I would like to know is there are any possibility to connect an IBM compatible printer to an Apple Talk net directly (or with a Net Serial hardware), and if I need any other software to do it.
4comp.sys.mac.hardware
In article <C5HvJx.DJ7@news.cso.uiuc.edu> dlbg1912@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (David L. Berk) writes: > I recently purchased a Centris 610 and a Mirror Technologies 19 inch > Mono monitor. I'm wondering if it is OK to set the monitor on top > of the CPU. The monitor weighs 54 lbs. > > I've called Apple. The person I spoke with was not sure but was > going to find out and call me back in a couple of days. That was > over a week ago.... > > If anybody knows, please respond via email as I don't always have time > to read this group. Thanks. > > David Berk > d-berk@uiuc.edu Yea, thanks to lots of good information in this newsgroup, I was prepared for lots of details (even shipping time ... got my C610 8/230/CD in 5 weeks). I guess my biggest disappointment is the lack of detail in the written specs and documentation. The case load spec is an example -- the setup section says Apple 14" and 16" monitors can go on top, but 21" and other big ones can't. Why couldn't they publish a maximum load? Now if I can figure out if there's any hope using the "partition" button on the hard disk setup utility (do I dare just try it and see what happens?), then maybe I can divide up the wealth among the family members a bit more securly. The "getting more information" section of the manual suggested trying other avenues before calling Apple, but didn't mention the net. -- Mike Feldman, Motorola Computer Group, (217) 384-8538, FAX (217) 384-8550 1101 East University Avenue Pager in IL (800) 302-7738, (217) 351-0009 Urbana, IL 61801-2009 (mcdphx|uiucuxc)!udc!feldman feldman@urbana.mcd.mot.com
4comp.sys.mac.hardware
pepke@dirac.scri.fsu.edu (Eric Pepke) writes: >"In Mammon We Trust" >"Hey, this is just a piece of paper!" >"Spend Me Quickly" "This is your god" (from John Carpenter's "They Live," natch) --Steve "The Lurking Horror" Stelter sjs28257@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu
0alt.atheism
for those who live near or plan to vacation in New Hampshire and Maine, I am posting the basic info of how to apply for a LTC (CCW) in those states for non-residents. post will be in rec.guns -J. Case Kim kim39@husc.harvard.edu
16talk.politics.guns
On Sat, 17 Apr 1993 20:42:58 GMT, Greg Hennessy observed: : In article <philC5n6D5.MK3@netcom.com> phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone) writes: : #Tells you something about the fascist politics being practiced .... : Ah, ending discrimination is now fascism. Is that what they called it when Truman forced integration of the armed forces, despite the opposition of Congress and most of the American public at that time? -- Michael D. Adams (starowl@a2i.rahul.net) Enterprise, Alabama "Tilting at windmills hurts you more than the windmills." -- Lazarus Long
18talk.politics.misc
In article <Apr.10.05.32.36.1993.14391@athos.rutgers.edu> gsu0033@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu (Eric Molas) writes: >Firstly, I am an atheist. . . . (Atheist drivel deleted . . .) Untitled ======== A seed is such a miraculous thing, It can sit on a shelf forever. But how it knows what to do, when it's stuck in the ground, Is what makes it so clever. It draws nutrients from the soil through it's roots, And gathers its force from the sun It puts forth a whole lot of blossoms and fruit, Then recedes itself when it is done. Who programmed the seed to know just what to do? And who put the sun in the sky? And who put the food in the dirt for the roots? And who told the bees to come by? And who makes the water to fall from above, To refresh and make everything pure? Perhaps all of this is a product of love, And perhaps it happened by chance. Yeah, sure. -Johnny Hart, cartoonist for _B.C._ +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-= Carter C. Page | Of happiness the crown and chiefest part is wisdom, A Carpenter's Apprentice | and to hold God in awe. This is the law that, cpage@seas.upenn.edu | seeing the stricken heart of pride brought down, | we learn when we are old. -Adapted from Sophocles +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=+-=-+-=+-=-+=-+-=-+-=-+=-+-=
15soc.religion.christian
Yamanari, ---Hey isn't it funny how betas have bugs in them.... Hey...do me a favor and don't put up stupid posts. Bob Clarkson University, Potsdam NY - campbers@craft.clarkson.edu
2comp.os.ms-windows.misc
atterlep@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Cardinal Ximenez) wrote: > Here's how I talk to non-Christians who are complaining about Hell. >ME: "Do you believe you're going to Heaven?" >HIM: "I don't believe in Heaven." >ME: "So are you going there?" >HIM: "If there was a heaven, I would." >ME: "But since there isn't a Heaven, you're not going there, are you?" >HIM: "No." > The point is that Heaven is based on faith--if you don't believe in heaven, >there's no way you're going to be in it. Hmmm... people in the americas before the time of Christ, children who die young, etc. ? > Of course, the next step is, "I don't believe in Hell either, so why will I >be there?" It seems to me that Hell is eternal death and seperation from God. But of course, the popular conception of hell (correct or incorrect) is something akin to eternal perpetuation of consciousness, at the very least. >Most atheists do believe that when they die they will die forever, and never >see God--so they do, in fact, believe that they're going to Hell. I think a good number of atheists believe there is nothing beyond bodily death, but it is simply an abuse of language to say they believe they're going to hell. They believe they're going to _die_. Understand that you've turned Hell into a verb. Using the same logic, it also follows that all animals are 'going to Hell.' Are you sure this is what you want to say? (presumably animals don't have the opportunity to get to heaven, but this still doesn't change the fact that they're going to Hell (die a final death)) I don't claim to know whether or not there is an afterlife of _some_ sort, but if Hell is as you described (final death, and not eternal perpetuation of consciousness) it will be true that there will never be a moment when I am aware of my non-existence. (assuming I 'go to Hell' and not to Heaven) In other words, I'll never know I'm dead. Hmmm... > Hell doesn't have to be worse than earth to be Hell--because it's eternal, Ever hear people say of a loved one who was ill, and has died: "At least she's not suffering any more; She's in Heaven now." ? Consider the following statement: "At least she's not suffering any more; She's in Hell now." The above statement sounds odd, but according to your definition of Hell, it would be a true statement. The person in Hell would not be suffering. Granted, they wouldn't be *anything* (wouldn't be having any conscious experience whatsoever). You say Hell (death) is eternal. However, this loses its meaning to a dead person. And to me, it seems that the threat of some sort of eternal punishment only makes sense/has force if one expects to be conscious throughout this eternity. Many atheists believe that the thirst for an afterlife is simply the product of propaganda ("Friend, do you want the FREE gift of e-ternal life?" It's my understanding that the early jews did not believe in an afterlife. Can anyone back me up on this?) combined with the survival instinct all animals share. The difference is we have consciousness, and once we get the idea of eternal life drilled into our brains, we then desire a sort of super-survival. >and it's a lot worse than Heaven. That's the only comparison that matters. That would depend on what Heaven is like. If God is a King, and an eternity in heaven consists of giving thanks and praise to the King, I might opt for Hell. I read a lovely account of a missionary trying to convert Eskimos to Christianity in the book _The Illusion of Immortality_ by Corliss Lamont. The missionary started to speak about Heaven. "Are there seals in heaven? Will we be able to go hunting?" asked an Eskimo. The missionary said no. The group of Eskimos then said something to the effect of, "Well what good is your Heaven if there's no hunting? Scram." I highly recommend the above book (IOI) to anyone who wants an account of the other side of the immortality coin (that there is no immortality). >Alan Terlep "Incestuous vituperousness" >Oakland University, Rochester, MI >atterlep@vela.acs.oakland.edu --Melissa Eggertsen >Rushing in where angels fear to tread. Pax, Dana
15soc.religion.christian
Anyone who knows this answer off-hand, please answer me by e-mail quickly ;). There is a pair of jumpers on one side, and a set of 3 or 4 on the other end. One is labeled, sync , and one CD, and E0 E1 E2. Whhich do I need to short, or disconnect to get drive to operate in slave mode? Give me a label or "geographic label, as they have quite a few jumpers, and I don't wanna try the trial and error method... I am using IDE. I think this drive is SCSI compatible too. Jimmy jimmyhua@usc.edu
3comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
When will I be able to call my favorite mail order software shop and buy NT? Jeff Dragovich dragovic@cevax.ce.uiuc.edu
2comp.os.ms-windows.misc
visser@convex.com (Lance Visser) writes: > > They cut off the water, there were no fire trucks present They refused to bring in fire equipment for fear that the firemen would be shot at. >and the FBI/ATF go blasting holes into the builing and firing gas munitions. They used a tank to knock a hole in the wall, and they released non-toxic, non-flammable tear gas into the building. -- _/_/_/ Brian Kendig Je ne suis fait comme aucun /_/_/ bskendig@netcom.com de ceux que j'ai vus; j'ose croire _/_/ n'etre fait comme aucun de ceux qui existent. / The meaning of life Si je ne vaux pas mieux, au moins je suis autre. / is that it ends. -- Rousseau
18talk.politics.misc
In article <1993Apr21.171811.25933@julian.uwo.ca> wlsmith@valve.heart.rri.uwo.ca (Wayne Smith) writes: > >In article <66758@mimsy.umd.edu> davew@cs.umd.edu (David G. Wonnacott) writes: >>I'm considering switching to Geico insurance, but have heard that >>they do not assign a specific agent for each policy or claim. I was >>worried that this might be a real pain when you make a claim. I have >>also heard that they try to get rid of you if you have an accident. > >I've read in this group that Geico has funded the purchasing of radar >guns by police depts (I'm not sure where). Geico has purchased radar guns in several states, I know they have done it here in CT. I have also heard horror stories about people that have been insured by Geico for years and then had 1 accident and were immediately dropped. And once you've been dropped by any insruance company you become labled a high risk, and end up forking out 3 or 4 times what you should be for insurance. My suggestion, stay where you are, or shop around but STAY AWAY from Geico! Jeff
7rec.autos
I have a vt200 and vt100 compatible terminal with 1200 external hyess modem amber screens 101 keyboard,cable make an offer 0
6misc.forsale
[Someone quoted the following. I've removed the name because it's not clear which name goes with which level of quote. --clh] > ... And to Holy Mary, Virgin is invariably added, for that Holy Woman > remains undefiled. > -- St. Epiphanus of Salamis, "Panacea against all heresies", > between A.D. 374-377. > ... For the Lord Jesus would not have chosen > to be born of a virgin if He had judged that she would be so incontinent > as to taint the birthplace of the Body of the Lord, home of the Eternal > King, with the seed of human intercourse. ... > -- Pope St. Siricius, Letter to Anysius, Bishop of > Thessalonica, A.D. 392 On the basis of these examples I would say that Joe Moore was only wrong in claiming Augustine as a prime mover of the sin=sex view. These quotes clearly equate sexuality with defilement and incontinance, even within the marriage relationship (else they would not apply to Mary after her marriage to Joseph). So Joe's assignment of the reasoning behind the concept of the perpetual virginity of Mary does seem to be supported by these quotes. -- sarima@teradata.com (formerly tdatirv!sarima) or Stanley.Friesen@ElSegundoCA.ncr.com
15soc.religion.christian
79 Toyota Corolla 4D hatchback, runs OK, needs dents smoothed, serious brake work and miscellaneous TLC. Excellent auto shop project. $250 OBO. See in Algonquin or Schaumburg. (708) 658-5285, (708) 576-0675, or email. -- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | "Johnson" | Behind every absurdity there lies a basic truth. | | johnson@wes.mot.com | Behind every basic truth there lies an absurdity. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
6misc.forsale