index
stringlengths
1
5
content
stringlengths
125
75.2k
3900
From: jmd@cube.handheld.com (Jim De Arras) Subject: Re: guns in backcountry? no thanks Organization: Hand Held Products, Inc. Lines: 59 Distribution: world NNTP-Posting-Host: dale.handheld.com In article <0096B294.AAD9C1E0@uinpla.npl.uiuc.edu> reimer@uinpla.npl.uiuc.edu (Paul E. Reimer) writes: > In article <1qkftjINNoij@cronkite.cisco.com>, pitargue@cisco.com (Marciano Pitargue) writes: > > [stuff deleted about causes of people in ER] > > >and your factoid about shooting victims in the ER. count how many come in > >due to automobile accidents and automobile crimes. maybe we should outlaw > >cars. > >marciano pitargue@cisco.com > > There are a lot of automobile accidents, but atleast there is some > regulation to try to combat this. Such as? Drunk drivers get back on the road in no time, to kill again. Seems the driver's license process does not work for this. > When I got my drivers license, I HAD > to take a drivers safety class. Because you wanted one while you were underage. > I HAVE to be licensed to drive. Only on public roads. > My car > MUST be registered. Only if it is to be driven on public roads, other than between segments of my property. > I MUST (at least where I live) have liability > insurance on both myself driving and my car (if someone else had an > accident with it). Only on public roads. > Hmm, wouldn't manditory saftey classes, registration > of both the owner and gun, and manditory liability insurance be nice for > gun owners. Perhaps, if it gave them permission to shoot in public roads and parks. :-) > > Paul Reimer > reimer@uinpluxa.npl.uiuc.edu Jim -- jmd@handheld.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "I'm always rethinking that. There's never been a day when I haven't rethought that. But I can't do that by myself." Bill Clinton 6 April 93 "If I were an American, as I am an Englishman, while a foreign troop was landed in my country, I never would lay down my arms,-never--never--never!" WILLIAM PITT, EARL OF CHATHAM 1708-1778 18 Nov. 1777
3901
From: bmoss@grinch.sim.es.com (Brent "Spuzy" Moss) Subject: Re: water in trunk of 89 Probe?? Nntp-Posting-Host: 130.187.200.5 Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp., Salt Lake City, UT Lines: 4 The rubber drain plugs under my carpet in my mazda glc leaked like the ones are doing under your spare in the Probe. I tooke them out and put some silicone sealant on them and put them back in.
3902
From: brian@lpl.arizona.edu (Brian Ceccarelli 602/621-9615) Subject: Re: Is it good that Jesus died? Organization: Lunar & Planetary Laboratory, Tucson AZ. Lines: 138 In article <bskendigC5rBvn.AAI@netcom.com> bskendig@netcom.com (Brian Kendig) writes: >And I maintain: > >Some people do not want to enter into the light and the knowledge that >they alone are their own masters, because they fear it; they are too >afraid of having to face the world on their own terms. And so, by >their own choice, they will remain in darkness, sort of like bugs >under a rock. However, some people, but not many, will not like the >darkness. Sometimes it gets too cold and too dark to be comfortable. >These people will crawl out from under the rock, and, although blinded >at first, will get accustomed to the light and enjoy its warmth. And, >after a while, now that they can see things for what they really are, >they will also see the heights which they can reach, and the places >they can go, and they will learn to choose their own paths through the >world, and they will learn from their mistakes and revel in their >successes. Are you your own master? Do you have any habits that you cannot break? For one, you seem unable to master your lack of desire to understand even the slightest concept of the Bible. Seems that ignorance has you mastered. How about sexual sins? Gotta any of those secret desires in your head that you harbor but can get control of? Do you dehumanize women when they walk past you? Do you degrade them to a sex object in your head? Are you the master of that kind of thinking? Do you insult people unknowingly, then regret it later. Yet do it again the next time opportunity presents itself? Are you truly the master of yourself? I have admitted that I am not the master of my thought life at all times. That I sometimes say things I do want to say, and then repeat my mistake unwantingly. I have admitted to myself that I cannot control every aspect of my being. There are times I know I shouldn't say something, but then say it anyway. There are times I simply forget a lesson. I, in fact, am not my own master. I need help. Jesus promised me this help. And I took him up on his offer. I have willfully let Jesus be my master because Jesus knows what is better for me than I myself do. And why not? Does not the creator know his creation better than the creation? Does Toyota know what's better for the Corolla than the Corolla? >Do you see my point? I think you're the one under the rock, and I'm >getting a great tan out here in the sunlight. My life has improved >immesurably since I abandoned theism -- come and join me! It will be >a difficult trip at first, until you build up your muscles for the >long hike, but it's well worth it! Then I guess ignorance is bliss for you. Because Brian, you enjoy not having a clue about the Bible. >Don't you see? I'm not going to accept ANYTHING that I can't witness >with my own eyes or experience with my own senses, especially not >something as mega-powerful as what you're trying to get me to accept. >Surely if you believe in it this strongly, you must have a good >*reason* to, don't you? Can you witness motherly love with your senses? How does caring and concern for you register with your senses? If nothing registers to you other than what you can see, taste, smell, hear and touch, then you better become a Vulcan and fast. You better get rid of your emotions. And I do have a good reason to believe what I do. >When did I say that? I say that I would rather CEASE EXISTING instead >of being subject to the whims of a deity, but that if the deity >decided to toss me into the fiery pits because of who I am, then so be it. The topic was about my God and your lack of knowledge about what my God says. My God says that you will not CEASE EXISTING. You have life forever. You can choose to either live it in hell in eternal torment where there is no communication whatsoever, or can choose to live it in paradise with God. That is what my God says. And that was the issue. Your made-up theism is what it is--made up. It's wishful thinking. >Nope -- most people are Christian. Most people are fond of feeling >that they are imperfect, of believing that the world is an undesirable >place, of reciting magical mystical prayers to make the world nice and >holy again, of doing just as their priests tell them, like good little >sheep. You enjoy darkness, and you're proud of it. Is this the religion of Kendigianism? Most people are not Christian. Most people, including Christians, are not fond of feeling that they are imperfect. Is "the world an undesireable place" a doctrine of Kendigianism? It has nothing to do with my God. Does Kendigism have magical mystical prayers as a part of its worship? Mine doesn't. Does Kendigianism believe that the world will be holy again? Mine doesn't. Does Kendigianism also dictate that one must obey what the priest tells them like good little sheep? Mine doesn't. Is this a bunch of lies you tell yourself so that you can justify being ignorant of the Bible? Brian, following Christ has nothing to do with the doctrines of Kendigianism. You would find any of your doctrines in the Bible. I don't follow Kendigianism. I follow Christ. Also, to try to again show you your ignorance of Christ and the Bible in regards to "priests", have you not read about the sole Melchizedek priest in Hebrews 7 and 8? Have you not read what the purpose is of the Old Testament Levitical priesthood and why there should NOT be priests today? Yes, guess what? The Catholics messed up. I do not follow Catholicism or any "ism." I follow Christ. >Nope. You make decisions, enjoy your successes, and accept your >failures; then you die. If you are content with the life you've led >as you reflect back on it in your final moments, then you've led a >good life. Why would you want to live a good life? To you, you die and that's it. Don't contradict yourself. You have no reason to live a good life. It doesn't do you any good in the end. Your life doesn't do anybody else any good either because everyone dies anyway. So you have no reason to lead a good life. Leading a good life is meaningless. Why do you do such a meaningless thing? >I'm sorry, I don't feel that sacrificing Jesus was something any god >I'd worship would do, unless the sacrifice was only temporary, in >which case it's not really all that important. Has the resurrection sunk in? Jesus is alive. Jesus is NOT dead. Jesus was sacrified to fufill the Old Testament sacrificial system in its every detail. Jesus's death was like a seed. He needed to fall to the ground so that many new lives would take root. Did you miss the entire John passage as well? >Forget the Bible for a minute. Forget quoting verses, forget about >who said what about this or that. *Show me.* Picture just you and me >and a wide open hilltop, and convince me that you're right. Forget that I am a person. Forget that I know how to type. Forget that I know how to put a sentence together. Forget that I know how to send e-mail. Forget my existence. Proove to me that I exist. . Be honest.
3903
From: baalke@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov (Ron Baalke) Subject: Re: Comet in Temporary Orbit Around Jupiter? Organization: Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lines: 22 Distribution: world NNTP-Posting-Host: kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41 In article <1993Apr6.061329.25582@den.mmc.com>, seale@possum.den.mmc.com (Eric H Seale) writes... >baalke@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov (Ron Baalke) writes: >>According the IAU Circular #5744, Comet Shoemaker-Levy 1993e, may be >>temporarily in orbit around Jupiter. The comet had apparently made a >>close flyby of Jupiter sometime in 1992 resulting in the breakup of the >>comet. > >Ooooh -- who would have thought that Galileo would get the chance to >check out a comet TOO?!? Comet Gehrels 3, which was discovered in 1977, was determined to have been in a temporary Jovian orbit from 1970 to 1973. Comet Shoemaker-Levy 1993e may remain in orbit around Jupiter long enough to allow Galileo to make some closeup observations. The orbital trajectory for Comet Shoemaker-Levy is still being determined. ___ _____ ___ /_ /| /____/ \ /_ /| Ron Baalke | baalke@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov | | | | __ \ /| | | | Jet Propulsion Lab | ___| | | | |__) |/ | | |__ M/S 525-3684 Telos | Being cynical never helps /___| | | | ___/ | |/__ /| Pasadena, CA 91109 | to correct the situation |_____|/ |_|/ |_____|/ | and causes more aggravation | instead.
3904
From: hal@cco.caltech.edu (Hal Finney) Subject: Re: text of White House announcement and Q&As on clipper chip encryption Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Lines: 45 Distribution: na NNTP-Posting-Host: alumni.caltech.edu The key question is whether non-Clipper encryption will be made illegal. > The Administration is not saying, "since encryption > threatens the public safety and effective law enforcement, > we will prohibit it outright" (as some countries have > effectively done); nor is the U.S. saying that "every > American, as a matter of right, is entitled to an > unbreakable commercial encryption product." There is a > false "tension" created in the assessment that this issue is > an "either-or" proposition. Rather, both concerns can be, > and in fact are, harmoniously balanced through a reasoned, > balanced approach such as is proposed with the "Clipper > Chip" and similar encryption techniques. The clear middle ground implied by these statements is to say that Americans have the right to Clipper encryption, but not to unbreakable encryption. This implies that, ultimately, non-Clipper strong encryption must become illegal. (As an aside, isn't the language here jarring? All this talk about "harmonious balance" when they're talking about taking away people's right to communications privacy?) Although the article emphasizes voice communication, data and mail encryption is mentioned as well: >Sophisticated encryption technology has been used for years to >protect electronic funds transfer. It is now being used to >protect electronic mail and computer files. > -- the privacy of our citizens, including the need to > employ voice or data encryption for business purposes; It looks like the worst nightmares raised by Dorothy Denning's proposals are coming true. If the government continues on this course, I imagine that we will see strong cryptography made illegal. Encryption programs for disk files and email, as well as software to allow for encrypted voice communications, will be distributed only through the "underground". People will have to learn how to hide the fact that they are protecting their privacy. It's shocking and frightening to see that this is actually happening here. Hal Finney hal@alumni.caltech.edu
3905
From: ebosco@us.oracle.com (Eric Bosco) Subject: CTRL-ALT DEL locks the computer fafter Windows Reply-To: ebosco@us.oracle.com Organization: Oracle Corp., Redwood Shores CA Lines: 9 Nntp-Posting-Host: monica.us.oracle.com X-Disclaimer: This message was written by an unauthenticated user at Oracle Corporation. The opinions expressed are those of the user and not necessarily those of Oracle. Whenever I exit Windows, I can't use control-alt DEL to reboot my computer, because the system hangs when I do this. I can still reboot using the reset key, but I would like to know why this happens.. Eric ebosco@us.oracle.com
3906
From: qpliu@ernie.Princeton.EDU (q.p.liu) Subject: Re: A visit from the Jehovah's Witnesses Originator: news@nimaster Nntp-Posting-Host: ernie.princeton.edu Reply-To: qpliu@princeton.edu Organization: Princeton University Lines: 34 In article <1993Apr5.091139.823@batman.bmd.trw.com> jbrown@batman.bmd.trw.com writes: >In article <16BA5DA01.I3150101@dbstu1.rz.tu-bs.de>, I3150101@dbstu1.rz.tu-bs.de (Benedikt Rosenau) writes: >> But could you give a definition of free will? Especially in the >> presence of an omniscient being? >"Will" is "self-determination". In other words, God created conscious >beings who have the ability to choose between moral choices independently >of God. All "will", therefore, is "free will". So these hypothetical conscious beings can ignore any influences of their circumstances (their genetics, their environment, their experiences) which are not all self-determined? (Of course, the idea of Hell makes the idea of "free will" dubious. On the other hand, the idea of Hell is not a very powerful idea. "A Parable for You "There was once our main character who blah blah blah. "One day, a thug pointed a mean looking gun at OMC, and said, 'Do what I say, or I'm blasting you to hell.' "OMC thought, 'If I believe this thug, and follow the instructions that will be given, I'll avoid getting blasted to hell. On the other hand, if I believe this thug, and do not follow the instructions that will be given, I'll get blasted to hell. Hmm... the more attractive choice is obvious, I'll follow the instructions.' Now, OMC found the choice obvious because everything OMC had learned about getting blasted to hell made it appear very undesirable. "But then OMC noticed that the thug's gun wasn't a real gun. The thug's threats were make believe. "So OMC ignored the thug and resumed blah blah blah.") -- qpliu@princeton.edu Standard opinion: Opinions are delta-correlated.
3907
From: halat@pooh.bears (Jim Halat) Subject: The fact of the theory Reply-To: halat@pooh.bears (Jim Halat) Lines: 74 In article <C5u6p5.5nx@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>, adpeters@sunflower.bio.indiana.edu (Andy Peters) writes: [...stuff deleted...] Andy-- I think we do agree, given your clarification of how we were each using the terms fact and theory. I'll only add that I think perhaps I feel more strongly about separating them, though your usage is quite valid. >Note that the fact of evolution is still a theory. In other words, it >could, theoretically, still be falsified and rejected. But since it's >so predictive, and so consistently supported by evidence, it seems >pointless to explicitly try to falsify it anymore. I'll add here that any falsification or rejection does not in any way reduce its current usefulness. So long as it accurately predicts or describes things we can observe. Not to be a pain in the ass, but is there any reason you don't just say _the theory of evolution_ rather than the _fact of evolution is still a theory_. I'm asking because this whole thread got started because I was bothered by a post that referred to _the fact of evolution_, basically leaving off the phrase _is still a theory_. Without a clarification, like the one you just gave, just saying _the fact of evolution_ has a very different meaning to me. > >[description of atomic theory, and alternative theories of gravity, deleted] >>Both are very useful models that >>have no religious overtones or requirements of faith, unless of course you >>want to demand that it is a factual physical entity described exactly >>the way the theory now formulated talks about it. > >Here is where you fail to make an important distinction. You have >shoehorned the _facts_ of the _existence_ of gravity and atoms and >evolution into one category with the _theories_ which have been >proposed to explain the _mechanisms_. The existence of these things >is so predictive as to be considered fact. The mechanisms, on the >other hand, are still worth discussing. I'm not sure I agree here. Again, it may be because I feel stronger about separating terms. I was trying to say that the _theories_ proposed to explain the _mechanisms_ and the _mechanisms_ themselves are the only realities here. It is the existence of mechanisms, not the things themselves, that are so predictive as to be considered fact (as you would say). There aren't really little planetary particle systems called atoms out there. Or I should say, and more to my original point, it would be a leap of faith to say there are, because we observe only the mechanisms. There is no need to _believe_ there are _actually_ atoms out there as we have decided to think about them. It's enough to discuss the mechanisms. At any rate, I'm not sure I am being any clearer than before, but I thought it was worth a shot. The bottom line, though, is I think we agree on two fundamental ideas: 1. --evolution is a theory supported by observational evidence (my way) --the fact of evolution is a theory supported by observational evidence (your way) 2. --creation is just an opinion. If a theist wants to call it a theory then he can. I won't: it has no supporting evidence and it neither predicts nor supports any observations that can be made. With no mechanisms to talk about, there really isn't much to say. Do you agree? -- jim halat halat@bear.com bear-stearns --whatever doesn't kill you will only serve to annoy you-- nyc i speak only for myself
3908
From: gtoal@gtoal.com (Graham Toal) Subject: Re: Off the shelf cheap DES keyseach machine (Was: Re: Corporate acceptance of the wiretap chip) Lines: 9 I think I should also point out that the mystical DES engines are known plaintext engines (unless you add a ton of really smart hardware?) Assume the ton of smart hardware. It doesn't really have to be that smart. G
3909
From: kenney@tribe.b17d.ingr.COM (David Kenney) Subject: My 1993 Predictions Reply-To: kenney@tribe.b17d.ingr.com Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, Alabama Lines: 57 I thought I'd post my predicted standings since I find those posted by others to be interesting. Sorry this is after Opening Day. I certify that these were completed before the first pitch. :-) AL East 1. New York Yankees - the most (only?) improved team in this division 2. Toronto Blue Jays - Stewart and Morris? No way. 3. Milwaukee Brewers - they always seem to do better than I expect 4. Baltimore Orioles - Pitching, but Devareaux, Anderson, and Hoiles will drop 5. Cleveland Indians - Still don't seem to know what they are doing 6. Detroit Tigers - All key players but Fryman are another year past peak 7. Boston Red Sox - Any team with Clemens and Viola might be beter than 7th Al West - this division was the toughest for me to pick. Whoever of the top 4 gets pitching should win it. 1. Minnesota Twins - young pitchers seem to have best chance for success 2. Texas Rangers - I don't know why I have them here. Jose Canseco? 3. Chicago White Sox - Frank Thomas but no pitching. 4. Oakland A's - LaRussa is the best manager and would keep any team close 5. Seattle Mariners - I like Pinella, but don't see much here 6. Kansas City Royals - will score no runs 7. California Angels - will win no games NL East 1. Montreal Expos - good all around, plus no Wallach! 2. St. Louis Cardinals - (Jeffries + Whiten) >> (Jose + Clark), no Galarraga 3. Pittsburgh Pirates - youngsters will take up more slack than expected 4. New York Mets - some good players, still not a "team" 5. Philadelphia Phillies - they don't impress me 6. Florida Marlins - they know what they're doing 7. Chicago Cubs - they don't know what they're doing NL West - The 2 best teams in baseball are in this division. 1. Atlanta Braves - Awesome starters, but offense could be a concern 2. Cincinnati Reds - Would not surprise me if they won it all 3. Houston Astros - Any team that signs Uribe won't contend. Closer to 4 than 2 4. San Diego Padres - Plantier could be the Sheffield of 1993 5. Los Angeles Dodgers - better pitching than the Giants 6. San Francisco Giants - because the Rockies just stink 7. Colorado Rockies - will become the Seattle Mariners of the NL. NLCS Montreal d. Atlanta (Braves fans, yes I'm probably contradicting what I said in my NL West comment.) ALCS New York d. Minnesota World Series New York d. Montreal - Hating the Yankees will be fashionable again NL MVP: Barry Bonds, or maybe McGriff NL Cy Young: Jose Rijo AL MVP: Frank Thomas will deserve it (again), but Fielder might win it AL Cy Young: Roger Clemens (at least will deserve it (again)) -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- David Kenney kenney@tribe.b17d.ingr.com
3910
From: randy@megatek.com (Randy Davis) Subject: Re: A Miracle in California Article-I.D.: megatek.1993Apr5.223941.11539 Reply-To: randy@megatek.com Organization: Megatek Corporation, San Diego, California Lines: 15 In article <1ppvof$92a@seven-up.East.Sun.COM> egreen@East.Sun.COM writes: |Bikers wave to bikers the world over. Whether or not Harley riders |wave to other bikers is one of our favorite flame wars... I am happy to say that some Harley riders in our area are better than most that are flamed about here: I (riding a lowly sport bike, no less) and my girlfriend were the recipient of no less than twenty waves from a group of at least twenty-five Harley riders. I was leading a group of about four sport bikes at the time (FJ1200/CBR900RR/VFR750). I initiated *some* of the waves, but not all. It was a perfect day, and friendly riders despite some brand differences made it all the better... Randy Davis Email: randy@megatek.com ZX-11 #00072 Pilot {uunet!ucsd}!megatek!randy DoD #0013
3911
From: pmartz@dsd.es.com (Paul Martz) Subject: Re: 24-bit Static color: will clients like it? Nntp-Posting-Host: bambam Reply-To: pmartz@dsd.es.com (Paul Martz) Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corp., Salt Lake City, UT Lines: 38 In article <1993Apr26.123918.1@vxcrna.cern.ch>, roeber@vxcrna.cern.ch (Frederick Roeber) writes: > I'm writing an X server for some video-generation equipment. The > hardware is "truecolor" in YUV space; in X terms it has a 24-bit > static color visual. I would really like to have the server just > present this static visual, but I'm not sure if this will be > acceptable to "most" X clients. The three problems I see are: > > 1) The colormap, though huge, is static. > 2) All pixels would be 3 bytes wide. > 3) Because the hardware actually lives in YUV space, the > translation RGB->YUV will introduce some rounding error. We tried to ship an X server once that only supported a 24bit TrueColor visual. The main problems we encountered were: 1) Clients written with logic like the following: if (DefaultDepth() != 1) /* Assume default depth is 8bit */ These clients need an 8bit deep visual in the root window to run correctly. 2) Other clients didn't even bother to do that much, and just outright assumed they had a *dynamic* visual class, with a dynamic colormap. XStoreColors doesn't work on cmaps associated with Static or TrueColor visual classes, but many clients don't bother to check, they just start throwing XStoreColor calls at you. Though both are clearly client error, this is the case with so many clients that it's easier for you to expose 8bit PseudoColor as a default root window visual, than it ever would be for all these client writers to change their clients to do the right thing. -- -paul pmartz@dsd.es.com Evans & Sutherland
3912
From: james@dlss2 (James Cummings) Subject: Re: Borland's Paradox Offer Organization: RedRock Development Distribution: usa Lines: 13 In article <5031@cvbnetPrime.COM> tbelmont@feds55.prime.com (Tom Belmonte x4858) writes: |I am considering buying Borland's Paradox for Windows since I |would like to use a database with Windows (I don't have/use |one yet) for both work/home use. I would like to advantage |of Borland's "$129.95 until April 30" offer if this package |is everything that Borland claims it to be. So, I was |wondering ... has anybody used this and/or have any opinions? Yes, and it's pretty much what they claim. I haven't had time to try all of it. Considering the price, even if you decide you don't like it, it should be saleable over the next 2-3 months for what you have in it (once the price goes up). All in all it's very serviceable; and in my humble opinion, more powerful than Access.
3913
From: andy@SAIL.Stanford.EDU (Andy Freeman) Subject: Re: Is itproper net etiquette to advertise a company's junk mail list? Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University. Distribution: usa Lines: 42 In article <1993Apr15.234451.15707@leland.Stanford.EDU> thomper@leland.Stanford.EDU (Dale Buford Thompson) writes: >>My company maintains a 20,000+ mailing list which is regularly rented for > ^^^^^^^^^^ Oh no! Someone is provided useful information AND mentioned that they made money in the field. Don't they know that usenet is reserved for uninformed speculation by people trying to sell their personal stuff (from houses to dead pcs) at a huge markup/trying to unload stuff they bought from their company at just under retail, and other "non-commercial" activities. >>a MS Windows utility product in the $100 range, and is available through > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>Direct Media in CT., at $0.10 per name. Please let your direct mail > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ !!!!!!^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >>marketing rep. know about this.. Thanks. >> !!!! !!!!! !!!! > >It is my impression that net etiquette does not allow companies to >use the net to directly advertise their products. The net is not "supposed" to be a dumping ground for free ads, but reserving it for tripe doesn't seem to be a significant improvement. >In addition to improper etiquette, this product is a mailing list >used for generating junk mail. So? Either they target it well enough to pay for it, in other words, they manage to send it to people who want the stuff (in which case it is junk only for the "rest" and the transaction costs are borne appropriately in this case) or they go bankrupt. Seems fair to me. >Am I correct in assuming this is improper, and if so, what can be >done to penalize such an improper use? You could hold your breath. You could kill offending messages as they come onto your machine and refuse to send them any further, but not until you turn blue. -andy --
3914
From: amolitor@nmsu.edu (Andrew Molitor) Subject: Re: Off the shelf cheap DES keyseach machine (Was: Re: Corporate acceptance of the wiretap chip) Organization: Department of Mathematics Lines: 19 NNTP-Posting-Host: moink.nmsu.edu In article <1r1otuINNdb2@dns1.NMSU.Edu> amolitor@nmsu.edu (Andrew Molitor) writes: > The 'plaintext' is digitized voice, and exists for a very short >time, probably in a couple inches of copper, tops. It's flatly not >available -- your bug in my office can hear my voice, and even digitize >it, but it's going to get a different bitstream. I am an idiot. The plaintext that's relevant is the session key. If you know that, you probably don't need a roomful of chips, do you? If you were going to brute force something interesting, that'd be the message stream, which is sort of approximately known by, say, a bug in my office. Then your roomful of chips could get the session key. Which I change every morning. Really, it's just a whole lot easier for the illicit wiretappers to stick a bug in your phone. Andrew Molitor
3915
From: seth@north6.acpub.duke.edu (Seth Wandersman) Subject: morphing Reply-To: seth@north6.acpub.duke.edu (Seth Wandersman) Lines: 6 Nntp-Posting-Host: north6.acpub.duke.edu Keywords: I am looking for some morphing programs for DEC's or pc's. I looked for a program called dmorph using archie but could not find it. I found a progrmam call morpho but it only did grayscale images. Does anyone know where I should look?
3916
From: rcook@gfx.engga.uwo.ca (Richard Cook) Subject: Re: Need to find out number to a phone line Organization: University of Western Ontario, London Nntp-Posting-Host: server.gfx.engga.uwo.ca Lines: 23 In article <20756.2bd16dea@ecs.umass.edu> alee@ecs.umass.edu writes: > >Greetings! > > Situation: I have a phone jack mounted on a wall. I don't > know the number of the line. And I don't want > to call up the operator to place a trace on it. > > Question: Is there a certain device out there that I can > use to find out the number to the line? > Thanks for any response. > Al > > How about calling someone with the Caller ID service and have them call you back with the number? -- Richard Cook (519) 641-1985 E-mail: rcook@gfx.engga.uwo.ca Elect. Eng. FAX (519) 661-3488
3917
From: bf3833@pyuxe.cc.bellcore.com (feigenbaum,benjamin) Subject: Re: Israel's Expansion II Organization: Bellcore, Livingston, NJ Summary: Hope Springs Eternal Lines: 37 In article <1993Apr20.013037.20907@news.columbia.edu>, pgf5@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Peter Garfiel Freeman) writes: > In article <19APR93.22304462.0062@VM1.MCGILL.CA> B8HA@MUSICB.MCGILL.CA (B8HA) writes: > >So nice of you all to answer some questions. And it so nice that most > >of you feel that it would be in your hearts to give the Palestinians > >some land - most of you focus on the fact that Israel annexed all > >this land and it is a kind gesture to give some of it back. Well, > >I hope that after after a state run by Palestinians is established, > >the first decision should be to make Jerusalem part of this state - > >by annexing it of course. > > > > >Steve Steve, If the Israelis are stupid enough to "allow" a second "Palestinian" state (the first one is Jordon), then you will probably get your wish - and the Israelis would get what's coming to them. However, if the "Palestinians" were to somehow demonstrate that they could govern themselves AND live in peace with their Jewish neighbors, then they would have to give up the idea of Jerusalem as a part of their state - and you would be disappointed. > > Israel has not annexed any of the West Bank, just Jeruselum. Which > will remain part of Israel forever! > > Yashir Koach to this. > > > Ben.
3918
From: jrbeach@iastate.edu (Jeffry R Beach) Subject: Re: Good Neighbor Political Hypocrisy Test Organization: Iowa State University, Ames, IA Lines: 25 In article <stevethC5Js6F.Fn5@netcom.com> steveth@netcom.com (Steve Thomas) writes: > Boy, it looks like the WOD is WORKING REALLY GOOD to stop people from > being screwed up in the head, given that example! > >(Issue: your friend _got_ his drugs--legal or not legal, he'll continue to >get them. Issue #2: why should _I_, as somebody who does NOT use illegal >drugs and who IS NOT "screwed up" have to PAY for this idiot's problems? He's >not doing anybody any harm except himself. The WOD, on the other hand, is an >immediate THREAT to MY life and livelyhood. Tell me why I should sacrafice >THIS to THAT!). Hello, is there anybody in there? You think you have to pay for this idiot's problem now, who's going to pay for the ballooning number of addicts and all of the associated problems with them. I don't even want to think about it with Hillary in the White House and an administration that "feels our pain". No harm but to himself? What about when he drives his school bus full of kids into a train. When he gets stoned and drives up on a sidewalk and kills 5 people. When he lives off me on Welfare for the rest of his life. The problem with the WOD is that it has no bite. Sending the slimy bastards to the chair for selling drugs to kids, now there's some bit.
3919
From: filinuk@staff.dccs.upenn.edu (Geoff Filinuk) Subject: Get Real. Caps have no chance Reply-To: filinuk@staff.dccs.upenn.edu (Geoff Filinuk) Organization: University of Pennsylvania Lines: 7 Nntp-Posting-Host: staff.dccs.upenn.edu Anyone who really believes that the Caps can beat the Pens are kidding themselves. The Pens may not loose one game in the playoffs. Geoff Filinuk Flyers Fan
3920
From: jhpb@sarto.budd-lake.nj.us (Joseph H. Buehler) Subject: Re: SSPX schism ? Organization: none Lines: 138 In article <Apr.20.03.03.06.1993.3836@geneva.rutgers.edu> shellgate!llo@uu4.psi.com (Larry L. Overacker) writes: You ask where we are. I would echo that question. I'm not trying to be contentious. But assuming that the Pope has universal jurisdiction and authority, what authority do you rely upon for your decisions? What prevents me from choosing ANY doctrine I like and saying that Papal disagreement is an error that will be resolved in time? This is especially true, since Councils of Bishops have basically stood by the Pope. The ultimate question is the traditional theology of the Church. This is the *only* thing that it is possible to resist a Pope for: his departure from the traditional doctrine of the Church. If commands from *any* authority conflict with Tradition, the commands must be disobeyed. My own view on this is that this conflict could only happen in a major way. God would never allow a hair-splitting situation to develop; it would be too complex for people to figure out. I don't view the present situation in the Church as anything extremely complicated. Run through a list of what has happened in the last 30 years in the Catholic Church, and any impartial observer will be aghast. It appears that much of what lies at the heart of this matter is disagreements over what is tradition and Tradition, and also over authority and discipline. The problems stem from a general widespread ignorance of the Catholic Faith, in my opinion. Most Catholics know about zilch about the Catholic Faith; this leaves them wide open for destruction by erring bishops. It's basically the Reformation part II. There is not even a question in my mind that in some respects the shards of the Catholic Church are currently being trampled upon by the Catholic hierarchy. I could go on listing shocking things for an hour, probably. Take the situation in Campos, Brazil, for example. I'm reading a book on what happened there after Vatican Council II. The bishop, Antonio de Castro-Mayer, never introduced all the changes that followed in the wake of Vatican II. He kept the traditional Mass, the same old catechisms, etc. He made sure the people knew their faith, the Catholic theology of obedience, what Modernism was, etc. He innoculated the people against what was coming. Well, one day the order came from Rome for his retirement. It came when the Pope was sick. Bishop de Castro-Mayer waited until the Pope recovered, then inquired whether this command was what the Pope really wanted, or something that some Liberal had commanded in his absence. The Pope confirmed the decision. So the good bishop retired. The injustice that followed was completely incredible. A new bishop was installed. He proceeded to expel most of bishop de Castro-Mayer's clergy from their churches, because they refused to celebrate the New Mass. The new bishop would visit a parish, and celebrate a New Mass. The people would promptly walk out of the church en masse. The bishop was *enraged* by this. He usually resorted to enlisting the help of the secular authorities to eject the priest from the church. The priests would just start building new churches; the people were completely behind them. The old parishes had the New Mass, as the bishop desired -- and virtually no parishioners. The prime motivation for all this was completely illegal, according to canon law. No priest can be penalized in any way for saying the traditional Mass, because of legislation enacted by Pope Saint Pius V. Nor is there any obligation to say the New Mass. During all this process, the people of Campos, not just private individuals, but including civil authorities, were constantly sending petitions and letters to Rome to do something about the new Modernist bishop. NOTHING was ever done; no help ever arrived from Rome. Eventually 37 priests were kicked out, and about 40,000 people. My question to the supporters of SSPX is this: Is there ANY way that your positions with respect to church reforms could change and be conformed to those of the Pope? (assuming that the Pope's position does not change and that the leaders of SSPX don't jointly make such choice.) If not, this appears to be claiming infallible teaching authority. If I adopt the view that "I'm NOT wrong, I CAN'T be wrong, and there's NO WAY I'll change my mind, YOU must change yours", that I've either left the Catholic Church or it has left me. If the Pope defines certain things ex cathedra, that would be the end of the controversy. That process is all very well understood in Catholic theology, and anyone who doesn't go along with it is an instant non-Catholic. The problem here is that people do not appreciate what is going on in the Catholic world. If they knew the Faith, and what our bishops are doing, they would be shocked! We sould argue from now until the Second Coming about what the "real" traditional teaching of the Church is. If this were a simple matter East and West would not have been separated for over 900 years. This isn't the case in the Catholic Church. There is a massive body of traditional teaching. The Popes of the last 150 years are especially relevant. There is no question at all what the traditional doctrine is. I thought that the teaching magisterieum of the church did not allow error in teachings regarding faith and morals even in the short term.` I may be wrong here, I'm not Roman Catholic. :-) That's heresy, more or less. Although they have done a great job since the Reformation, the last 30 years have seen so many errors spread that it's pitiful. Infallibility rests in the Pope, and in the Church as a whole. In the short term, a Pope, or large sections of the Church can go astray. In fact, that's what usually happens during a major heresy: large sections of the Church go astray. (The Pope historically has been much more reliable.) Everything will always come back in the long run. What would be the effect of a Pope making an ex cathedra statement regarding the SSPX situation? Would it be honored? If not, how do you get around the formal doctrine of infallibility? Again, I'm not trying to be contentions, I'm trying to understand. Since I'm Orthodox, I've got no real vested interest in the outcome, one way or the other. Yes, it would be honored. Infallibility is infallibility. But what is he going to define? That the New Mass is a better expression of the Catholic Faith than the old? That sex education in the Catholic schools is wonderful? That all religions are wonderful except for that professed by the Popes prior to Vatican II? It does if the command was legitimate. SSPX does not view the Pope's commands as legitimate. Why? This is a VERY slippery slope. Not really; start studying the major Catholic theologians of the last 300 years. Everything is very well spelled out. The West excels at critical thought, remember? That's what Catholic theologians have been busy at for centuries.
3921
From: steve-b@access.digex.com (Steve Brinich) Subject: Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, MD USA Lines: 10 NNTP-Posting-Host: access.digex.net I suspect that the decisive element in the political battle will be the FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) factor. If the people who would be end users of the Cripple Chip hear of the whole debate only vaguely -- the government says it's solid; other people in the field say it's Swiss cheese -- the balance of doubt could shift against the Feds. Any attempt to limit other forms of encryption could then be presented as the government covering its own butt by protecting its poor product from superior competition. Comments?
3922
From: morrow@cns.ucalgary.ca (Bill Morrow) Subject: Amplifier into CD-ROM earphone plug ? Nntp-Posting-Host: cns16.cns.ucalgary.ca Organization: University of Calgary Lines: 16 We have a Sun CD-ROM drive which I would like to play audio CD's in. I have an old 10 watt amplifier which works fine when connected to a junk "Walkman" style AM/FM radio. This amp ties the common path of the earphone connection to ground. However, it doesn't work with my Sony Walkman cassette player, or the CD drive, it produces of loud low-frequency tone. Obviously Sony doesn't ground the earphone output common. Does anyone have specs on the CD drive's output? Will an audio transformer help? What are others using to play there CD's in the Sun drive so that more than one can listen? Thanks for the help. -- Bill Morrow Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary e-mail: morrow@cns.ucalgary.ca voice: (403) 220-6275 fax: (403) 283-8770 3330 Hospital Drive NW Calgary, Alberta, CANADA T2N 4N1
3923
From: aardvark@cygnus.la.locus.com (Warren Usui) Subject: Re: The 1964 Phillies: deja vu? Keywords: Phillies Organization: Locus Computing Corporation, Los Angeles, California Lines: 21 In article <ericsC5Hzr5.EuI@netcom.com> erics@netcom.com (Eric Smith) writes: >Yeah, the Phillies played over their heads almost the whole year, >but it all caught up to them in one 10-game streak. I *am* as old as >1964 (man!) and I was a big Phillies fan at the time (age 13). . . . >the Dodgers or somebody else finish two games back? That has to be >one of the closest last minute scrambles ever. Since I was born in the late Pleistocene, I too remember 1964. That year, the Dodgers were several games out of first and I think finished sixth in the league. This was kind of odd because they won the World Series both the previous year and the following year. -- Warren Usui I'm one with the Universe -- on a scale from 1 to 10.
3924
From: ptrei@bistromath.mitre.org (Peter Trei) Subject: Re: The battle is joined Nntp-Posting-Host: bistromath.mitre.org Organization: The MITRE Corporation Lines: 15 In article <C5nn9I.D5q@news.claremont.edu> ebrandt@jarthur.claremont.edu (Eli Brandt) writes: >In article <1993Apr16.181040.9381@qualcomm.com> karn@servo.qualcomm.com (Phil Karn) writes: >>It looks like Dorothy Denning's wrong-headed ideas have gotten to the >>Administration even sooner than we feared. > >I'd lay long odds that it was the other way around. Clinton didn't >just pull this plan out of any bodily orifices; the NSA has to have >been working on it for years. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I first heard rumors of a similar government proposal (in Risks Digest???) in 1987 or 1988. Peter Trei ptrei@mitre.org
3925
From: hsieh1@carson.u.washington.edu (Darrell Kirk) Subject: For Sale: Complete Communicator card for IBM-voicemail, modem, Fax Organization: University of Washington, Seattle Lines: 8 Distribution: usa NNTP-Posting-Host: carson.u.washington.edu Complete Communicator, latest vers. New in box Works in DOS or Windows One card you get fax, voicemail and modem. Auto switch, one line handles all fax, voicemail and modem communications $500 new 250 dollars, and you pay shipping
3926
From: geb@cs.pitt.edu (Gordon Banks) Subject: Re: Dislocated Shoulder Reply-To: geb@cs.pitt.edu (Gordon Banks) Organization: Univ. of Pittsburgh Computer Science Lines: 19 In article <1993Apr9.181944.5353@e2big.mko.dec.com> steve@caboom.cbm.dec.com (Steve Katz) writes: > >Recently I managed to dislocate my shoulder while >sking. The injury also seems to have damaged the nerves >in my arm. I was wondering if someone could point me towards >some literature that would give me some background into >these types of injuries. Please respond by EMAIL if possible. > Your medical school library should have books on peripheral nerve injuries. Probably it was your brachial plexus, so look that up. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Gordon Banks N3JXP | "Skepticism is the chastity of the intellect, and geb@cadre.dsl.pitt.edu | it is shameful to surrender it too soon." ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
3927
From: crphilli@hound.dazixca.ingr.com (Ron Phillips) Subject: Randy Weaver Trail - Day 3 Nntp-Posting-Host: hound Reply-To: crphilli@hound.dazixca.ingr.com Organization: "Intergraph Electronics, Mountain View, CA" Distribution: usa Lines: 85 This was posted to the firearms-politics mailing list. ============================================================= Hi Folks; Thursday, April 15 marked Day 3 of the trial. This day marked the first testimony of the trial. Deputy U.S. Marshal Larry Cooper took the stand for the prosecution. The short version is that his testimony was consistent with the opening statements for the prosecution. Cooper testified that he had arrived in Spokane (Washington) on August 17, 1992 to participate in a surveillance operation with five other deputies near the Weaver cabin. The team was using night vision equipment for surveillance, and split up into two teams of three people. The six later met at an observation point above the cabin. After this, deputies Cooper, William Degan, and Arthur Roderick began a descent to scout further possible surveillance sites. Cooper told the court that Roderick threw two large rocks into a gully to see, "whether the [Weaver family] dogs would respond." Striker, the Weaver's yellow lab, started toward them barking loudly. Roderick led the three in a run from the area. They ran through some dense woods into an open area [called the "fern field"] with the dog in pursuit. By this time, Kevin Harris and Samuel Weaver had joined the chase. The surveillance team had reached a Y in the road: Cooper decided that they should take cover in the woods because otherwise they would be an easy target and might be "shot in the back." As Degan reached the Y, he spotted Randy Weaver coming down the road from the cabin ahead. Weaver was startled but did not fire. At this moment, Striker reached Degan, and Cooper had to "fend him off with his gun." [It is unclear whether this means he clubbed the dog or shot the dog]. Both Cooper and Degan then took cover in the woods. According to Cooper, Kevin Harris and Samuel Weaver continued walking down the road, apparently not noticing the two. After they had passed by on the road, Degan got up on one knee, raised his gun, and shouted, "Stop! U.S. Marshal!" Harris then "...brought the weapon around at hip level and fired. He didn't bring the weapon up to eye level. I saw Bill's arm going back, and I knew he had been hit." Cooper fired at Harris, and Harris went down. Cooper then brought his weapon to bear on Samuel, but did not fire. At this point, Cooper then heard two shots to his right. Samuel Weaver looked in the direction of the shots, yelled, "You son of a bitch!" and ran toward them. Cooper then realized that shots were coming at him from directly ahead, so he fired a three-round burst at the cabin. At this point he then saw Samuel Weaver running toward the cabin. When Cooper reached Degan, he placed his first two fingers on Degan carotid artery, counted two or three beats, and then his heart stopped. Shortly thereafter, Roderick and the other three marshals joined him. They then all heard a large burst of gunfire from the area around the cabin. On cross-examination, David Nevin questioned the point of throwing rocks into the gulley, asking, "You wanted to lure that dog out so you could shoot that dog, didn't you?" Nevin also pointed out that in last September's testimony, Cooper had claimed that he spotted Weaver after the dog had left him. Cooper claimed that he had gone over the events in his head and decided that Thursday's account was correct. Nevin continued the cross-examination by asking what Cooper would have done had an armed man dressed in full camouflage jumped out of the woods at him [no answer was available]. Friday, April 16 marks continued cross-examination of Cooper. Notes: There was no coverage of protestors. Drew ============================================================== -- ************************************************************** * Ron Phillips crphilli@hound.dazixca.ingr.com * * Senior Customer Engineer * * Intergraph Electronics * * 381 East Evelyn Avenue VOICE: (415) 691-6473 * * Mountain View, CA 94041 FAX: (415) 691-0350 * **************************************************************
3928
From: jake@bony1.bony.com (Jake Livni) Subject: Re: Legality of the jewish purchase Organization: The Department of Redundancy Department Lines: 46 In article <1993Apr21.181628.23279@news.columbia.edu> ayr1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Amir Y Rosenblatt) writes: >In article <1993Apr19.214951.19180@bnr.ca> zbib@bnr.ca writes: >It was shafting on the part of the Arab land owners for doing it >without notifying their tenant farmers and for not being responsible >enough to make provisions for them, but rather just leaving >them to their fate. If a landlord sells an apartment building "vacant" to another landlord and fails to notify his tenants, they just might find themselves out on the street all of a sudden. The seller may be a scoundrel and a crook but this doesn't make the buyer a "thief", as Israelis are so often called here on tpm. >>It is interesting though that you acknowledge that the >>palestinians were shafted. Do many Israelis or Jews share >>your opinion ? Do you absolve the purchaser from >>any ethical commitments just because it wasn't written down? > >I don't know if others share this opinion. It is mine, >and I'm sure there are some who agree and some who don't >The way I see it, the fallahin were caught in circumstances >beyond their control, in that since they didn't own the land, >they didn't have a say. Of course, now for the sake of the "greater >Arab unity" the Arabs are angry that the land was sold to the Jews >(an act that is illegal in Jordan), but when it happened, it was just >business. The Arabs that lived along the coast in Western Palestine, later to be called Israel, were shafted by their brother Arabs just as they've been shafted for decades since then by their Arab bretheren. Somehow, though, the Arab call has continued to blame Israel, not only for the Syrian landowner sell-out in Western Palestine (Israel) but even for the occupation of Eastern Palestine (Jordan) by the Hashemites. This is just more of refusing to take blame for one's own actions. >>infra-structure etc...). IMHO the Palestinians have grounds >>to contest the legality of the purchase, say in world court. If your job was eliminated in a corporate takeover, you could probably go to court, too. You'd probably lose, though. -- Jake Livni jake@bony1.bony.com Ten years from now, George Bush will American-Occupied New York have replaced Jimmy Carter as the My opinions only - employer has no opinions. standard of a failed President.
3929
From: mitch@unidata.ucar.edu (Mitch Baltuch) Subject: motif based graphing package Organization: University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) Distribution: na Lines: 15 i am in need of a motif-based graphing package to integrate into a large software package under development for distribution to universities. it can be either public domain or commercial, although a commercial package can't have royalties required for binary only distribution. we need 2-d graphing capabilities at a minimum, but 3-d would be nice. any info would be appreciated and i will summarize if there is interest. thanks, mitch -- _______________________________________________________________________________ Mitchell S. Baltuch Unidata Program Center mitch@unidata.ucar.edu UCAR, PO Box 3000 303/497-8652 Boulder, CO 80307-3000
3930
Subject: Re: Bikes vs. Horses (was Re: insect impac From: emd@ham.almanac.bc.ca Distribution: world Organization: Robert Smits Lines: 21 cooper@mprgate.mpr.ca (Greg Cooper) writes: > In article <1qeftj$d0i@sixgun.East.Sun.COM>, egreen@east.sun.com (Ed Green - > >In article sda@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu, ai598@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Mike Sturde > >> > >> Only exceptional ones like me. Average ones like you can barely fart > >>by themselves. > > > >Fuck you very much, Mike. > > > > Gentlemen _please_. > -- Greg's obviously confused. There aren't many (any) gentlemen on this newsgroup. Well, maybe. One or two. Robert Smits Ladysmith BC | If Lucas built weapons, wars emd@ham.almanac.bc.ca | would never start, either.
3931
From: bading@cs.tu-berlin.de (Tobias 'Doping' Bading) Subject: Re: Forcing a window manager to accept specific coordinates for a window Organization: Technical University of Berlin, Germany Lines: 36 Distribution: world <C5u667.Ln8@boulder.parcplace.com> <1r5l8g$bub@wsinfo03.win.tue.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: athene.cs.tu-berlin.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-reply-to: rcb5@wsinfo03.win.tue.nl's message of 22 Apr 1993 10:33:20 +0200 In article <1r5l8g$bub@wsinfo03.win.tue.nl> rcb5@wsinfo03.win.tue.nl (Richard Verhoeven) writes: Sorry, but olwm and tvtwm don't do it. They place the title at that position and the window at a position below it. This becomes a problem when you want a program to be able to save its current configuration and restore is later. Currently, my solution is: XCreateWindow(...); XSetWMProperties(..); XMapWindow(...); XFlush(...); XMoveWindow(...); It works with olwm, but is less than elegant. All this leaves me wondering if I'm overlooking something obvious. Richard. I know that the mwm has an resource to specify if positions are to be used for the border of a window or for the "user" window. Maybe other window managers have similar options. Another way to figure out the difference between the "user" window position and the window manager decoration window position is to subtract their positions. You just have to use XQueryTree and remember that the window manager decorations window is the parent of your window. Unfortunately, you can only figure out the decoration width and height after the window has been mapped this way. Greeting, Tobias (bading@cs.tu-berlin.de)
3932
From: rlglende@netcom.com (Robert Lewis Glendenning) Subject: Re: Estimating Wiretap Costs/Benefits Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) Lines: 61 In article <1993Apr20.203756.20667@kronos.arc.nasa.gov> hanson@kronos.arc.nasa.gov (Robin Hanson) writes: >I'm attempting to write a serious policy paper examining whether the >proposed wiretap (or "Clipper") chip is a cost-effective tool for >police investigation. That is, ignoring concerns about government >intrusions into individual privacy, is the value of easy wiretaps to >investigators greater than the cost to the communications industry, >and their customers, to support this wiretap technology? > >A rough estimate suggests that wiretaps are worth about five million >dollars per year to U.S. law enforcement agencies. (In 1990, 872 U.S. >wiretaps led to 2057 arrests, while total police expenditures of $28 >billion led to 11.25 million arrests [ref US Statistical Abstracts].) >I'm working on estimating this wiretap benefit more accurately, but >I'd like to ask hardware experts out there to help me with estimating >the costs of the new proposed wiretap technology. > >Please send me quotable/citeable estimates for: > >- How many chips which would need to be made per year to keep all > phones with wiretap chips? >- How much would it cost to make each chip? >- How much did it cost to develop this technology in the first place? >- How much more would supporting hardware, people, etc. cost, per chip? >- What percentage cheaper would encryption chips and support have been > if private enterprise could compete to meet customer encryption needs? >- What percentage of phone traffic would be taken up by the proposed > "law enforcement blocks"? >- What is the total cost of handling all phone traffic per year? > >Put another way, the question I'm asking is, what if each police >agency that wanted a particular wiretap had to pay for it, being >charged their share of the full social cost of forcing communication >to be wiretap compatible? Would they choose to buy such wiretaps, or >would they find it more cost-effective to instead investigate crimes >in other ways? >-- >Robin Hanson hanson@ptolemy.arc.nasa.gov >415-604-3361 MS-269-2, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035 >510-651-7483 47164 Male Terrace, Fremont, CA 94539-7921 First, what the fuck is NASA doing wasting my tax dollars doing policy papers on stuff far outside of their purvew/mission? Second, this isn't a problem of economics. This is a problem of the incremental accumulation of police-state powers by our government. How, exactly, do you put a price on the loss of freedom of a society? Maybe use the dollars/life lost calculations for the extra people killed by the gov. The pain and suffering cases for those tortured. The dollars/life lost caused by the inevitable collapse of the economy, and all the secondary effects of diseases, diet, etc. Plus, the inevitable collapse of the economy as the gov controls it, becomes corrupt, etc. Do us a favor. Resign rather than right this paper for NASA. Go do useful work for the society. lew -- Lew Glendenning rlglende@netcom.com "Perspective is worth 80 IQ points." Niels Bohr (or somebody like that).
3933
From: acsddc@smucs1.umassd.edu Subject: Fenway Gif Reply-To: acsddc@smucs1.umassd.edu Organization: UMASS DARTMOUTH, NO. DARTMOUTH, MA. Lines: 5 I was wondering if anyone had any kind of Fenway Park gif. I would appreciate it if someone could send me one. Thanks in advance. -Dan
3934
From: sproulx@bmtlh204.BNR.CA (Stephane Proulx) Subject: Re: Cobra Locks Reply-To: sproulx@bmtlh204.BNR.CA (Stephane Proulx) Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd. Lines: 105 You may find it useful. (This is a repost. The original sender is at the bottom.) -------------------cut here-------------------------------------------------- Article 39994 of rec.motorcycles: Path: scrumpy!bnrgate!corpgate!news.utdallas.edu!hermes.chpc.utexas.edu!cs.ute exas.edu!swrinde!mips!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!widener!eff!ibmpc cug!pipex!unipalm!uknet!cf-cm!cybaswan!eeharvey From: eeharvey@cybaswan.UUCP (i t harvey) Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles Subject: Re: Best way to lock a bike ? Message-ID: <861@cybaswan.UUCP> Date: 15 Jul 92 09:47:10 GMT References: <1992Jul14.165538.9789@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> Lines: 84 These are the figures from the Performance Bikes lock test, taken without permission of course. The price is for comparison. All the cable locks have some sort of armour, the chain locks are padlock and chain. Each lock was tested for a maximum of ten minutes (600 secs) for each test: BJ Bottle jack CD Cutting disc BC Bolt croppers GAS Gas flame The table should really be split into immoblisers (for-a-while) and lock-to-somethings (for-a-short-while) to make comparisons. Type Weight BJ CD BC GAS Total Price (kg) (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (Pounds) ======================================================================== ========= 3-arm Folding .8 53 5 13 18 89 26 Cyclelok bar Abus Steel-o- Cable 1.4 103 4 20 26 153 54 flex Oxford Cable 2.0 360 4 32 82 478 38 Revolver Abus Diskus Chain 2.8 600 7 40 26 675 77 6-arm Folding 1.8 44 10 600 22 676 51 Cyclelok bar Abus Extra U-lock 1.2 600 10 120 52 782 44 Cobra Cable 6.0(!) 382 10 600 22 1014 150 (6ft) Abus closed Chain 4.0 600 11 600 33 1244 100 shackle Kryptonite U-lock 2.5 600 22 600 27 1249 100 K10 Oxford U-lock 2.0 600 7 600 49 1256 38 Magnum Disclock Disc .7 n/a 44 n/a 38 1282 43 lock Abus 58HB U-lock 2.5 600 26 600 64 1290 100 Mini Block Disc .65 n/a 51 n/a 84 1335 50 lock ======================================================================== ========= Pretty depressing reading. I think a good lock and some common sense about where and when you park your bike is the only answer. I've spent all my spare time over the last two weeks landscaping (trashing) the garden of my (and two friends with bikes) new house to accommodate our three bikes in relative security (never underestimate how much room a bike requires to manouver in a walled area :( ). Anyway, since the weekend there are only two bikes :( and no, he didn't use his Abus closed shackle lock, it was too much hassle to take with him when visiting his parents. A minimum wait of 8 weeks (if they don't decide to investigate) for the insurance company to make an offer and for the real haggling to begin. Abus are a German company and it would seem not well represented in the US but very common in the UK. The UK distributor, given in the above article is: Michael Brandon Ltd, 15/17 Oliver Crescent, Hawick, Roxburgh TD9 9BJ. Tel. 0450 73333 The UK distributors for the other locks can also given if required. Don't lose it Ian -- _______________________________________________________________________ Ian Harvey, University College Swansea Too old to rock'n'roll eeharvey@uk.ac.swan.pyr Too young to die '79 GS750E
3935
From: livesey@solntze.wpd.sgi.com (Jon Livesey) Subject: Re: Yet more Rushdie [Re: ISLAMIC LAW] Organization: sgi Lines: 28 Distribution: world NNTP-Posting-Host: solntze.wpd.sgi.com In article <1993Apr3.100039.15879@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>, darice@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Fred Rice) writes: |> In <1p8ivt$cfj@fido.asd.sgi.com> livesey@solntze.wpd.sgi.com (Jon Livesey) writes: |> |> >Should we British go around blowing up skyscrapers next? |> |> I don't know if you are doing so, but it seems you are implying |> (1) that the person accused of blowing up the WTC in NY actually did it, |> and |> (2) that Islamic teachings have something to do with blowing up the WTC. I was replying to a person who attempted to justify the fatwa against Rushdie on the grounds that his work was intentionally insulting. I think that to take a single sentence from a fairly long posting, and to say "I don't know if you are doing so, but it seems you are implying....." is at the very best quite disingenuous, and perhaps even dishonest. If anyone care to dig back and read the full posting, they will see nothing of the kind. I trust you don't deny that Islamic teaching has "something to do" with the fatwa against Rushdie? jon.
3936
From: b.liddicott@ic.ac.uk Subject: Re: He has risen! Organization: Imperial College Parapsychology Group Lines: 8 NNTP-Posting-Host: cs.utexas.edu Just to remark that I have heard that David Koresh has risen from the dead. I dont know if it is true or not, but this is what I have been told. What do you guys think? Ben L.
3937
From: ashok@biochemistry.cwru.edu (Ashok Aiyar) Subject: Re: WinQVT/Net V3.4? Article-I.D.: biochemi.ashok.661.0 Distribution: usa Organization: CWRU School of Medicine Lines: 19 NNTP-Posting-Host: axa12-slip.dialin.cwru.edu In article <354@lorien.OCF.LLNL.GOV> dave@angmar.llnl.gov (Dave Fuess) writes: >An earlier article in this newsgroup made reference to >WinQVT/Net version 3.4. Realy? Where? I tried archie >with no luck. It's probably just a typo. Not a typo. It was uploaded to ftp.cica.indiana.edu a couple days back. >But I sure would like to get one if it's real as I too >have a printer problem in WinQVT. Version 3.4 uses standard Windows printer drivers. Ashok -- Ashok Aiyar Mail: ashok@biochemistry.cwru.edu Department of Biochemistry Tel: (216) 368-3300 CWRU School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio Fax: (216) 368-4544
3938
From: amanda@intercon.com (Amanda Walker) Subject: Re: Would "clipper" make a good cover for other encryption method? Organization: InterCon Systems Corporation - Herndon, VA USA Lines: 44 Distribution: world Reply-To: amanda@intercon.com (Amanda Walker) NNTP-Posting-Host: chaos.intercon.com X-Newsreader: InterCon TCP/Connect II 1.1 bontchev@fbihh.informatik.uni-hamburg.de (Vesselin Bontchev) writes: > If there are many as..., er, people in the USA who reason like the > above, then it should not be surprising that the current plot has been > allowed to happen... The willingness of the majority of the people to give up their freedom in exchange for a sense of safety is hardly limited to the USA, and is an endemic problem in any human society of any appreciable size. The structure of the US government does try to combat this tendency to some extent, but fighting entropy is always a losing battle. Most people would rather have comfort than freedom. The paradox is that you can't really have the former, in the long term, unless you have the latter. One of the reasons that I probably come across to some people as a weird cross between a libertarian and an "establishment tool" is that I end up taking an utterly pragmatic view of government. I don't get up in arms when the government fails to protect the interests of the people, because in my lifetime it never has--therefore, I have no expectation that it will. As a result, I protect my own interests rather than expecting the government to be "fair". I will use strong cryptography when I think it is needed, whether or not it is legal at the time. Same thing with anything else the government would rather not see in private hands--that's their problem. What's important to me is using the right tool for the job. If it's legal, so much the better. If it is not, but does not violate my (very strong) sense of personal ethics, I will use it anyway as long I think it is worth it. Expecting the government to actually protect the interests of its citizens, except by accident, is utter folly. Even Jefferson, one of the major architects of the American system of government, figured that in a couple hundred years it would become so corrupt and self-serving that it would be time dismantle it and try again, by revolution if necessary. I agree, and while I don't go around trying to spark one, I'll certainly participate if it happens when I'm around. There is a reason I am such a strong supporter of individual rights while being so cynical about politics. I've already written off politics. And yes, this may get me in trouble some day. If so, so be it. I drive faster than 55 MPH, too. Amanda Walker InterCon Systems Corporation
3939
From: loh@fraser.sfu.ca (Keith Meng-Wei Loh) Subject: Re: Hockey and the Hispanic community Organization: Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C., Canada Lines: 27 rickc@wrigley.corp.sgi.com (Richard Casares) writes: >In article <115331@bu.edu>, icop@csa.bu.edu (Antonio Pera) writes: >|> >|> The presence of the new team in Miami(I can't say South Florida; >|> it's too long) makes me think of an interesting question. Can you sell >|> the Hispanic community on Hockey? Miami is 60-70% Hispanic. This >|> community >|> has no experience and no previous exposure to Hockey that I know of. >|> The >|> teams in NY and LA which also have big Hispanic groups do not seem to >|> try >|> to woo this group. What will Miami do? Could they get Spanish-language >|> tv and radio coverage? >|> >You'll have a hard time selling any sport to a community that >can't play it on account of availability or financial reasons. >Hockey is pretty much a sport for the white and well off. Well, suffice to say that it is a sport for those able to make the substantial investment in equipment, etc. But here's something, do you think that the availability of in-line skates and road hockey could contribute to a rise in awareness of ice hockey? I would argue this is having an effect here. Kids play ice hockey in the winter and road hockey in the summer with in-line skates.
3940
From: MJMUISE@1302.watstar.uwaterloo.ca (Mike Muise) Subject: Re: Drinking and Riding Lines: 19 Organization: Waterloo Engineering In article <C4wKBp.B9w@eskimo.com>, maven@eskimo.com (Norman Hamer) writes: > What is a general rule of thumb for sobriety and cycling? Couple hours > after you "feel" sober? What? Or should I just work with "If I drink > tonight, I don't ride until tomorrow"? 1 hr/drink for the first 4 drinks. 1.5 hours/drink for the next 6 drinks. 2 hours/drink for the rest. These are fairly cautious guidelines, and will work even if you happen to have a low tolerance or body mass. I think the cops and "Don't You Dare Drink & Drive" (tm) commercials will usually say 1hr/drink in general, but after about 5 drinks and 5 hrs, you could very well be over the legal limit. Watch yourself. -Mike ________________________________________________ / Mike Muise / mjmuise@1302.watstar.uwaterloo.ca \ no quotes, no jokes, \ Electrical Engineering, University of Waterloo / no disclaimer, no fear.
3941
From: hsteve@carina.unm.edu () Subject: XTranslateCoord. Problem Organization: University of New Mexico, Albuquerque Lines: 13 NNTP-Posting-Host: carina.unm.edu It seems like XTranslateCoord. doesn't work the way I expecting it. Right after performs a XMoveWindow, I want to know the absolute window position with respect to the root window. To get this info. I do a XTranslateCoordinates but the abs_x, and abs_y aren't right? Does anybody know of a way to find out this information? Thanks, please e-mail to hsteve@carina.unm.edu if it's possible -- _---_ Steve / o o \ hsteve@hydra.unm.edu, hsteve@carina.unm.edu | \___/ | Just say NO to VMS!!
3942
From: scot@jlc.mv.com (Scot Salmon) Subject: NuTek Email? Organization: John Leslie Consulting, Milford NH Lines: 9 Does NuTek (or anyone at NuTek) have an email address? If not, why not? =) -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Good Things: Books by Robert Heinlein, Music by Enya, Computers by Apple, Humor by Dave Barry, Thursday nights on NBC, and Scotland. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Scot Salmon (scot@jlc.mv.com) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
3943
From: dlneal@apgea.army.mil (Dennis L. Neal <dlneal>) Subject: AMIGA Software For Sale!! Organization: Edgewood Lines: 22 Nntp-Posting-Host: cbda9.apgea.army.mil I have the following Amiga software for sale: ProVideo GOLD $50 AmigaVision $25 B.E.S.T. Plan It! $10 spreadsheet (still in shrinkwrap) SuperBack $10 (hard drive backup) Certificate Maker $10 Add s&h to the above and its yours...email me at the address listed below: thanx, -Dennis L. Neal dlneal@cbda9.apgea.army.mil
3944
From: jca2@cec1.wustl.edu (Joseph Charles Achkar) Subject: Re: Numerical Nothingness Nntp-Posting-Host: cec1 Organization: Washington University, St. Louis MO Lines: 38 In article <1993Apr18.140401.18439@freenet.carleton.ca> ad684@Freenet.carleton.ca (Bob Wilson) writes: > >Mario averaged 2.66666666666666666666666666666666666666666666 >points per game ... the Antigretz Gretzky averaged 2.69 pts/game >Mario projected over 80 games. >213 points (beats Wayne's record by 1) Check your information before posting, Gretzky's record is 215 pts in 80 games. >Over 84 games 97 g + 127 a = 224 points. > Over 84 games, Gretzky's total projected 226 points. >Pitt's winning percentage with Mario (45-10-5) over 84 games >-> 133 points. Would this have been a record? >I know Mtl had 132 one year. The 76-77 Canadiens had .825 percentage, 132 pts in 80 games. (60-8-12). The 29-30 Bruins had a .875 winning percentage. Also the 77-78 Canadiens had a .806 percentage with a 59-10-11 record. >Bob Wilson >ad684@freenet.carleton.ca %*%*%*%**%*%%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%* * __ ______________ ____________________________________ % % \ \_)____________/ A L L E Z L E S B L U E S ! ! ! * * \ __________/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ % % \ ________/ * * \ _______/ Joe Ashkar % % \ \ Contact for the Blues * * \ \ SAINT LOUIS jca2@cec1.wustl.edu % % (___) BLUES * *%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%*%
3945
From: caf@omen.UUCP (Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX) Subject: Re: My New Diet --> IT WORKS GREAT !!!! Organization: Omen Technology INC, Portland Rain Forest Lines: 29 In article <1r3ks8INNica@lynx.unm.edu> bhjelle@carina.unm.edu () writes: >In article <1993Apr21.091844.4035@omen.UUCP> caf@omen.UUCP (Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX) writes: >>In article <19687@pitt.UUCP> geb@cs.pitt.edu (Gordon Banks) writes: >>> >>>Can you provide a reference to substantiate that gaining back >>>the lost weight does not constitute "weight rebound" until it >>>exceeds the starting weight? Or is this oral tradition that >>>is shared only among you obesity researchers? >> >>Not one, but two: >> >>Obesity in Europe 88, >>proceedings of the 1st European Congress on Obesity >> >>Annals of NY Acad. Sci. 1987 >> >Hmmm. These don't look like references to me. Is passive-aggressive >behavior associated with weight rebound? :-) > >Brian I purposefully left off the page numbers to encourage the reader to study the volumes mentioned, and benefit therefrom. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX ...!tektronix!reed!omen!caf Author of YMODEM, ZMODEM, Professional-YAM, ZCOMM, and DSZ Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 17505-V NW Sauvie IS RD Portland OR 97231 503-621-3406
3946
From: kevinh@hslrswi.hasler.ascom.ch (kevinh) Subject: Re: WARNING.....(please read)... Originator: kevinh@nath Reply-To: kevinh@hasler.ascom.ch Organization: Ascom Hasler AG Lines: 20 In article <C5H7qz.KyA@boi.hp.com>, wesf@boi.hp.com (Wes Fujii) writes: |> Brian LaRose (larose@austin.cs.utk.edu) wrote: |> |> : I never saw the guy. The police said they thought the motive was to |> : hit the car, have us STOP to check out the damage, and then JUMP US, |> : and take the truck. |> : |> : PLEASE BE AWARE OF FOLKS. AND FOR YOUR OWN GOOD, PLEASE DON'T STOP!!!! |> |> Sad. This sort of thing is on the rise across the country. South Florida |> is getting a lot of national TV coverage on the subject where vacationers |> are being attacked (and some killed) in schemes similar to this. Make that worldwide coverage. I know numerous people who were planning holidays to the Florida, and have now chosen another (non-US) destination. You expect this sort of thing, perhaps, in third world countries - but not the US! kevinh@hasler.ascom.ch
3947
From: jk87377@lehtori.cc.tut.fi (Kouhia Juhana) Subject: Re: More gray levels out of the screen Organization: Tampere University of Technology Lines: 21 Distribution: inet NNTP-Posting-Host: cc.tut.fi In article <1993Apr6.011605.909@cis.uab.edu> sloan@cis.uab.edu (Kenneth Sloan) writes: > >Why didn't you create 8 grey-level images, and display them for >1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128... time slices? By '8 grey level images' you mean 8 items of 1bit images? It does work(!), but it doesn't work if you have more than 1bit in your screen and if the screen intensity is non-linear. With 2 bit per pixel; there could be 1*c_1 + 4*c_2 timing, this gives 16 levels, but they are linear if screen intensity is linear. With 1*c_1 + 2*c_2 it works, but we have to find the best compinations -- there's 10 levels, but 16 choises; best 10 must be chosen. Different compinations for the same level, varies a bit, but the levels keeps their order. Readers should verify what I wrote... :-) Juhana Kouhia
3948
From: Mark-Tarbell@suite.com Subject: Switch-mode power supply Organization: Suite Software Lines: 17 Reply-To: suite!tarbell@uunet.uu.net NNTP-Posting-Host: gilgamesh.suite.com Is there a typical component or set of components that are at fault when a switch mode power supply goes south? The supply is for a disk drive. Any general hints would be appreciated! Thanks! Mark-Tarbell@suite.com at fault when a switch mode power supply goes south? The supply is for a disk drive. Any general hints would be appreciated! Thanks! Mark-Tarbell@s$$BVh(J
3949
From: mark@ardsley.business.uwo.ca (Mark Bramwell) Subject: Re: Cellular Phone (Portable) for sale Organization: Western Business School Distribution: usa Summary: Takes longer than 24 hours Nntp-Posting-Host: home-pc1.business.uwo.ca Lines: 19 > >I hope you realize that for a cellular phone, you need to subscribe to a >Cellular carrier, and it usually takes at least one working day before >the service is available to you. Only then you can find out whether >the phone is working. > >Tin > Not true. Dial 811 and listen to the recording. If you get it, then your phone was recognized by the network. You wouldn't be able to dial a real number yet (of course!) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mark Bramwell, VE3PZR Located in sunny London, Ontario Internet: Mark@ARDSLEY.business.uwo.ca IP Address: 129.100.29.33 Packet: VE3PZR @ VE3GYQ UWO Phone: (519) 661-3714
3950
From: dcoleman@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Daniel M. Coleman) Subject: Re: pc-junior usable? Organization: The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas Lines: 20 NNTP-Posting-Host: flubber.cc.utexas.edu In article <1993Apr17.201300.19312@sernews.raleigh.ibm.com> europa@tomcat.raleigh.ibm.com (Welch Bryan) writes: >My fiance has a pc-junior and wants to upgrade to a full 386. Does anyone >know if we could use the monitor it came with on a new machine? I heard >it's MCGA or EGA, but not sure which. Also, does it use cards, so we can >use the drive controller, floppy, etc? The only things you'll be able to salvage from the junior are the floppy drives and monitor. The floppies are 360k, and the monitor is CGA, but you will need an adaptor cable to use it. The junior does not use standard cards. Unless you're really strapped for cash, you should just junk the thing and buy new stuff. Dan -- Daniel Matthew Coleman | Internet: dcoleman@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu -----------------------------------+---------- : dcoleman@utxvms.cc.utexas.edu The University of Texas at Austin | DECnet: UTXVMS::DCOLEMAN Electrical/Computer Engineering | BITNET: DCOLEMAN@UTXVMS [.BITNET] -----------------------------------+------------------------------------------
3951
From: wb8foz@skybridge.SCL.CWRU.Edu (David Lesher) Subject: Re: History question Organization: NRK Clinic for habitual NetNews abusers - Beltway Annex Lines: 24 Reply-To: wb8foz@skybridge.scl.cwru.edu (David Lesher) NNTP-Posting-Host: skybridge.scl.cwru.edu Others said: {early PA?} # I recall reading of a phonograph which used mechanical amplification. # Compressed air was squirted out of a valve which was controlled by the # pickup. The result was noisy and distinctly lo-fi, but much louder # than a conventional phonograph. It tended to wear the disks out # pretty quickly though. An now-deceased prof told us willing students about a project he had worked on during WWII. They needed a mega-power PA with very clear audio quality. The purpose was to bellow at refugees from aircraft. Their solution was a giant compressed-air source, and a horn with parallel shutters worked by a small audio system. I think he said it worked very well, thus the War Dept. cancelled the project ;_}. -- A host is a host from coast to coast..wb8foz@skybridge.scl.cwru.edu & no one will talk to a host that's close............(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
3952
From: mcovingt@aisun3.ai.uga.edu (Michael Covington) Subject: 'Easter' not derived from 'Ishtar' Organization: AI Programs, University of Georgia, Athens Lines: 22 Several recent posts have identified the English word 'Easter' with the Babylonian goddess 'Ishtar'. 'Easter' is a pagan word all right, but it has nothing to do with Ishtar. If 'Easter' and 'Ishtar' were related, their history would show it. But in Old English, Easter was 'Eostre', cognate with English 'East' and German 'Ost'. The reconstructed Proto-Germanic form is 'Austron'. Not until after 1400 did 'Easter' have a high front vowel like 'Ishtar'. Clearly, the two words have quite separate origins. There may be neo-pagans who worship Ishtar at Easter, but if so, they are making either a mistake of etymology, or a deliberate play on words. -- Michael Covington (Ph.D., linguistics) -- :- Michael A. Covington, Associate Research Scientist : ***** :- Artificial Intelligence Programs mcovingt@ai.uga.edu : ********* :- The University of Georgia phone 706 542-0358 : * * * :- Athens, Georgia 30602-7415 U.S.A. amateur radio N4TMI : ** *** ** <><
3953
From: babb@rapnet.sanders.lockheed.com (Scott Babb) Subject: Re: Radar detector DETECTORS? Organization: Lockheed Sanders X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL9] Distribution: na Lines: 24 Brian Day (bday@lambda.msfc.nasa.gov) wrote: : On December 29, 1992, it was illegal to operate a radar detector : in the state of Virginia. If one got caught, one got fined $65.00. : Ask me how I know. The Federal Communications Act of 1934 made it *legal* for you to operate a radio receiver of any kind, on any frequency (including X, K, and Ka bands) in the United States. The Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1989(?) restricted the FCA of 1934 by making it illegal to receive the land-mobile telephone service, including (I believe) cellular phones. No restriction was placed on receiving RADAR (or, curiously, cordless phones.) Enforcement of the Virginia law is in violation of the FCA of 1934. If you have lots of time and money (and a lawyer, which I'm *not*,) you can argue this in a federal court and try to have the law overturned. I can hardly wait to see the responses to this one, but somebody had to say it... -- Lockheed Sanders may disagree so these are solely the opinions of: Scott L. Babb - babb@rapnet.sanders.lockheed.com "We didn't inherit the Earth from our parents, we are borrowing it from our children."
3954
From: abou@dam.cee.clarkson.edu Subject: Re: computer books for sale (UPDATED LIST) Article-I.D.: news.1993Apr6.013433.16103 Organization: Clarkson University Lines: 76 Nntp-Posting-Host: dam.cee.clarkson.edu UPDATED LIST Hi everybody I have the following books for sale. Some of these books are brand new. If you find any book you like and need more information about it, please feel free to send me an E-Mail. The buyers pays the shipping fees. Thanks. abou@sun.soe.clarkson.edu ======================================================================== TITLE : Windows Programming: An Introduction AUTHOR : William H. Murray, III & Chris H. Pappas PUBLISH.: Osborne McGraw-Hill pp. : 650 COVER : Soft NOTE : Covers up to Windows 3.0 ASKING : $15 ====================================================================== TITLE : Harvard Graphics: The Complete Reference AUTHOR : Cary Jensen & Loy Anderson PUBLISH.: Osborne McGraw-Hill pp. : 1073 COVER : Soft NOTE : Covers Releases Through 2.3 & Draw Partner ASKING : $15 ======================================================================= TITLE : High Performance Interactive Graphics: Modeling, Rendering, and Animating AUTHOR : Lee Adams PUBLISH.:Windcrest pp. : 402 COVER : Soft NOTE : Full of examples programs in BASIC ASKING :$15 ======================================================================== TITLE : Science and Engineering Applications on the IBM PC AUTHOR : R. Severin PUBLISH.: Abacus pp. : 262 COVER : Soft NOTE : A lot of Examples in BASIC ASKING :$ 10 ========================================================================= TITLE : Graphics for the Dot-Matrix Printer: How to Get Your Printer to Perform Miracles AUTHOR : John W. Davenport PUBLISH.: Simon & Schuster pp. : 461 COVER : Soft NOTE : Full of examples Programs in BASIC ASKING : $10 ========================================================================== TITLE : Programming With TURBO C AUTHOR : S. Scott Zimmerman & Beverly B. Zimmerman PUBLISH.: Scott, Foresman and Co. pp. : 637 COVER : Soft NOTE : Some of the pages are highlighted ASKING : $10 ========================================================================== TITLE : Introduction to Computer Graphics AUTHOR : John Demel & Michael Miller PUBLISH.: Brooks/Cole Engineering Division pp. : 427 COVER : Soft NOTE : Example Programs in BASIC and Fortran ASKING : $10 ========================================================================== TITLE : Hard Disk Mangement: The Pocket Reference AUTHOR : Kris Jamsa PUBLISH.: Osborne McGraw-Hill pp. : 128 COVER : Soft NOTE : Pocket Size ASKING : $ 4 ==========================================================================
3955
From: mor@expo.lcs.mit.edu (Ralph Mor) Subject: Re: Tom Gaskins Pexlib vs Phigs Programming Manuals (O'Reilly) Organization: X Consortium, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science Lines: 49 merlin@neuro.usc.edu (merlin) writes: >Could someone explain the difference between Tom Gaskins' two books: > o PEXLIB Programming Manual > o PHIGS Programming Manual >Why would I want to buy one book vs the other book? I have an 80386 >running SCO UNIX (X11R4) on my desktop, a SUN IV/360 in my lab, and >access to a variety of other systems (Alliant FX/2800, Cray Y/MP) on >the network. Mostly, we would like to do 3D modeling/visualization >of rat, rabbit, monkey, and human brain structure. Rather than decide which book you want to buy, you need to decide which programming interface you want to use, then buy the appropriate book. I wrote an article for the X Resource which discusses the differences between PHIGS and PEXlib (it will appear in Issue 6 which should be out pretty soon). But here's a brief summary... PHIGS is a graphics API which was designed to be portable to many devices. Most implementations support the X Window System and take advantage of a 3D extension to X called "PEX". PEXlib is a slightly "lower" level API which was designed to efficiently support the PEX extension to X. Some advantages of using PEXlib... - Integrates with Xlib,Xt,Motif,etc. better than PHIGS - Provides immediate mode capabilities - Is free of "policy" - PEX supports PHIGS, but is currently being extended to support features not found in PHIGS (like texture mapping, anti-aliasing). PEXlib will give you access to all of these features. Some advantages of using PHIGS... - Support for multiple devices, not just X based ones - Support for archiving, metafiles, hardcopy output - PHIGS has predefined input devices to make input easier - PHIGS can handle exposure events and resizing for you - PHIGS can help you with colormap selection/creation. If you're working strictly in X and don't care about things like archiving, I would go with PEXlib. Either way, you will find that both API's have a lot in common. Ralph Mor MIT X Consortium
3956
From: margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis) Subject: Re: I thought commercial Advertising was Not allowed Distribution: na News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.17i by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers Lines: 35 Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com (Larry Margolis) Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM. Nntp-Posting-Host: netslip63.watson.ibm.com Organization: The Village Waterbed In <C50sMA.3GK@voder.nsc.com> matt@galaxy.nsc.com (Matt Freivald x8043) writes: >In article 164871 in talk.politics.misc, margoli@watson.ibm.com >(Larry Margolis) writes: > >>>I would suggest that legal precedent defines a human being (i.e., a person >>>whose rights are protected by the Constitution and the law) as someone with >>>a functioning brain. > >>No, if you want to use legal precedent, you should take a look at the >>Model Penal Code, on which many states base their criminal code: > >My apologies if I was unclear; I was not trying to start a statutory >debate, since there are many (in some cases conflicting) statutes on >the books. I was merely suggesting a paradigm that might make sense >for a pro-choicer IMHO. And I was pointing out that legal precedent defines a human being as referring only to the born, so your suggestion was incorrect. >>>If at some point an unborn child is a human being, the parents clearly >>>have the same responsibilities toward her as any other parents have toward >>>their children. > >>And no parent can be forced to supply bodily resources toward their children, >>even if necessary to save the child's life. > >There is a confusion here between action and inaction: a parent does not have >to run out in front of a bus to save their child's life either, but a parent >IS required to feed his children. There is a confusion here about what "bodily resources" constitutes. Blood transfusions and organ donations involve bodily resources; your examples do not. -- Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
3957
From: caryd@a.cs.okstate.edu (CARY DAVID ALLEN) Subject: Self-modifying hardware Organization: Oklahoma State University, Computer Science, Stillwater Lines: 70 Permit me to quote fragments of praetzel@sunee.uwaterloo.ca's article out of context. -Newsgroups: sci.electronics,comp.lsi.cad -From: praetzel@sunee.uwaterloo.ca (Eric Praetzel) -Date: 10 Feb 93 15:46:41 GMT - Currently the XNF format is propierty and I know of at least on person at -a university who was able to get it after signing a non-disclosure agreement. -The Xilinx-bit map format is pretty well top secret. I would love to know it -because then you could make self_modifying_hardware ;-) As it is I had to -reverse eng. the Xilinx tools to dump the bit map to the FPGA because it only -runs on the computer with the hardware key. self-modifying hardware could be *very* interesting -- computers that could write thier own programs (assemblers, compilers) were an immense breakthrough from calculators that couldn't. - I eagerly await a programmable gate array which uses a PD format and does -not cost your first born to program. Till then we will keep on reverse -engineering whatever we can. As it is one company that I worked at has gone -under. FPGAs are what they needed to make their product competitive. They -could not afford them. In the end you could say that they could not afford -to not use them but the management discovered that too late. - - Eric my condolences. i can't even imagine what i could do with self-modifing hardware. i *can* imagine self-modifying software, and even though *all* my teachers say that's BAD, even Worse than GOTO, check out what the experts *used* to say about self-modifying code: (he uses "orders" rather than "opcodes") "On the Principles of Large Scale Computing Machines" by Goldstine and von Neumann, collected in _John von Neumann: Collected Works, Vol. V_ reprinted here with absolutely no permission from anyone. "We plan... to have a full size (40 binary digit) word hold either contain 1 full size number (... equivalent to 12 decimal digits, but we will use the first binary digit to denote the sign) or two (20 binary digit) orders. .... It should be added that this technique of automatic substitutions into orders, i.e. the machine's ability to modify its own orders (under the control of other ones among its orders) is absolutely necessary for a flexible code. Thus, if part of the memory is used as a "function table", then "looking up" a value of that function for a value of the variable which is obtained in the course of the computation requires that the machine itself should modify, or rather make up, the reference to the memory in the order which controls this "looking up", and the machine can only make this modification after it has already calculated the value of the variable in question. On the other hand, this ability of the machine to modify its own orders is one of the things which makes coding the non-trivial operation which we have to view it as." david cary, tenor, e- and comp. engineering (finger caryd@a.cs.okstate.edu). 227 S. 163 E. Ave, Tulsa, OK 74108-3310, USA, Sol 3, Universe v. 1.2 -- david cary, tenor, e- and comp. engineering (finger caryd@a.cs.okstate.edu). 227 S. 163 E. Ave, Tulsa, OK 74108-3310, USA, Sol 3, Universe v. 1.2
3958
From: whit@carson.u.washington.edu (John Whitmore) Subject: Re: Help with ultra-long timing Article-I.D.: shelley.1pr91aINNikg Distribution: world Organization: University of Washington, Seattle Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: carson.u.washington.edu In article <1pqu12$pmu@sunb.ocs.mq.edu.au> johnh@macadam.mpce.mq.edu.au (John Haddy) writes: >In article <C513wI.G5A@athena.cs.uga.edu>, mcovingt@aisun3.ai.uga.edu (Michael Covington) writes: >|> (1) Don't use big capacitors. They are unreliable for timing due to >|> leakage. True (especially for electrolytic capacitors at high temperature). >|> Instead, use a quartz crystal and divide its frequency by 2 40 times >|> or something like that. >... Wouldn't a crystal be affected by cold? My gut feeling is that, as a >mechanically resonating device, extreme cold is likely to affect the >compliance (?terminology?) of the quartz, and hence its resonant frequency. Low power quartz oscillators are usually 32 kHz (and THESE have significant temperature drifts, which one doesn't often notice while wearing the watch on one's wrist). Low temperature sensitivity is available in other crystal types, which unfortunately are larger and higher frequency (1 MHz or so) and take more battery power. Programmable timers might be less accurate, but they are more power-stingy than suitable crystal oscillators. John Whitmore
3959
From: dyer@spdcc.com (Steve Dyer) Subject: Re: Analgesics with Diuretics Organization: S.P. Dyer Computer Consulting, Cambridge MA In article <ofk=lve00WB2AvUktO@andrew.cmu.edu> Lawrence Curcio <lc2b+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes: >I sometimes see OTC preparations for muscle aches/back aches that >combine aspirin with a diuretic. You certainly do not see OTC preparations advertised as such. The only such ridiculous concoctions are nostrums for premenstrual syndrome, ostensibly to treat headache and "bloating" simultaneously. They're worthless. >The idea seems to be to reduce >inflammation by getting rid of fluid. Does this actually work? That's not the idea, and no, they don't work. -- Steve Dyer dyer@ursa-major.spdcc.com aka {ima,harvard,rayssd,linus,m2c}!spdcc!dyer
3960
From: wilbanks@spot.Colorado.EDU (Kokopeli) Subject: Re: Old Predictions to laugh at... Nntp-Posting-Host: spot.colorado.edu Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder Lines: 35 tedward@cs.cornell.edu (Edward [Ted] Fischer) writes: >From jpalmer@uwovax.uwo.ca Thu Sep 12 10:35:58 1991 >> >>Ron Hassey will be a minor league manager with the Yankees. >Dunno what happened to him. Maybe I can help you. He's a major league coach with the Rockies. So above prediction is doubly wrong. My prediction: The Red Sox-Cubs Series and Vikings-Broncos SuperBore will occur at the end of the world. And one Rockie will finish in the top 10 of an offensive catagory this year. And no Rockie starter will have an ERA below 3.50. And the Rangers fade will not begin until...August. They'll give way to the Angels. But still challenge to the end. Really. Not making any of this up. If I am, may God strike me down *ZZZZZZT* >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Thanks for listening! >-Valentine -- Dylan Wilbanks, Environ. Con : The official USENET rabid fan of the major, U of Colorado, Boulder: Colorado Rockies. Clip this .sig for PO Box 1143, Boulder, CO : 20% off on your next Rockies woof!!! 80306-1143. Life is bigger. : (this space intenionally blank)
3961
From: lioness@maple.circa.ufl.edu Subject: More Adaptec 1542B problems Organization: Center for Instructional and Research Computing Activities Lines: 25 Reply-To: LIONESS@ufcc.ufl.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: maple.circa.ufl.edu Okay, here is my configuration: 80486-33 Gateway 433C Micronics ISA 12MB RAM WD212MB IDE HD ( drive C: ) ST3144A 125MB IDE HD ( drive D: ) Adaptec SCSI 1542B controller, with SCSI BIOS enabled Seagate ST296N 80MB SCSI drive Alrighty, when I boot up I get the Adaptec BIOS message, but it says something like: "Drive C: installed" "Drive D: installed" "ADaptec SCSI BIOS not installed!" And I can't get to the Seagate drive. I go into PhoenixBIOS setup, remove the entry for drive D:, and BOOM, I can access the Seagate. Is there a way to get two IDE drives and the Seagate at the same time? I have ASPI4DOS.SYS, but it just hangs the system. Brian
3962
From: dwarner@journalism.indiana.edu (David J.) Subject: Re: Omar Vizquel - GRAND SALAMI? Nntp-Posting-Host: clove.journalism.indiana.edu Reply-To: dwarner@journalism.indiana.edu Organization: Indiana University Lines: 16 Cheryl Marks writes > > Do you think Omar's grand slam is the result of his new fan club? Last week > a banner appeared in the Kingdome: > > OLDER WOMEN FOR OMAR That depends. Just how much older were they? > Cheryl -- David J.(dwarner@journalism.indiana.edu)*****Blue Riddle Productions 1993 *-------------------------------It's on.--------------------------------* ***"THE RAP IS AN ART EP" is coming out on tape -- this time for real.*** *------------------------E-mail me for the 411.-------------------------*
3963
From: wlm@wisdom.attmail.com (Bill Myers) Subject: Re: graphics libraries In-Reply-To: ch41@prism.gatech.EDU's message of 21 Apr 93 12:56:08 GMT Organization: /usr1/lib/news/organization Lines: 28 > Does anyone out there have any experience with Figaro+ form TGS or > HOOPS from Ithaca Software? I would appreciate any comments. Yes, I do. A couple of years ago, I did a comparison of the two products. Some of this may have changed, but here goes. As far as a PHIGS+ implementation, Figaro+ is fine. But, its PHIGS! Personally, I hate PHIGS because I find it is too low level. I also dislike structure editing, which I find impossible, but enough about PHIGS. I have found HOOPS to be a system that is full-featured and easy to use. They support all of their rendering methods in software when there is no hardware support, their documentation is good, and they are easily portable to other systems. I would be happy to elaborate further if you have more specific questions. -- |------------------------------------------------------| ~~~ Here's lookin' at ya. ~~_ _~~ |`O-@'| Bill | wlm@wisdom.attmail.com @| > |@ Phone: (216) 831-2880 x2002 |\___/| |_____| |______________________________________________________|
3964
From: PA146008@utkvm1.utk.edu (David Veal) Subject: Re: Gun Control (was Re: We're Mad as Hell at the TV News) Article-I.D.: martha.1993Apr6.162820.19369 Organization: University of Tennessee Division of Continuing Education Lines: 47 In article <C4tsHu.Ew6@magpie.linknet.com> manes@magpie.linknet.com (Steve Manes) writes: >Frank Crary (fcrary@ucsu.Colorado.EDU) wrote: >: That's all very well and good, but I was refering to all >: homocides, not just ones involving handguns (what is this fixation >: on death by shooting, as if it were somehow worse than death >: by stabbing?) > >What relevance are ALL homicides in this debate? What do you think gun >control advocates are saying: that if we get rid of all handguns we will >live in a homicide-free world? The relevance is that if you've got x homicides and reduce the number of gun homicides in that group, but x doesn't decrease by a significant amount, have you made an improvement, and is that improvement worth what you've paid? >The issue is guns, not baseball bats. Even a simpleton knows that >he stands a better chance of surviving an attack with a baseball bat... >certainly of outrunning a bat-wielding assailant. If a baseball bat is a tenth as likely to kill a victim as a gun, is that any comfort to that tenth? >As for knives, see my earlier post. I'd much rather face a knife >than a gun, thanks. I've faced a knife. And I was damn annoyed I didn't *have* a gun. All the statistics in the world didn't change the fact that *he* was interested in cutting *me*. >Fortunately, the best defense against a knife isn't >another knife. Anyone trained in unarmed self-defense won't have >much of a problem disarming a knife assailant untrained in knife >assault (which probably means 99.9% of knife assailants). "Anyone trained in self-defense." Unarmed self-defense isn't for everyone. What's more, it requires substantially more training to be safe and effective than a firearm. It requires physical proximity and thus a greater threat to the victim, which is a primary problem with stun guns. You have to actually touch your assailant. Unless you're *very* good, a large, stronger assailant can simply ignore your blows long enough to incapacitate you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ David Veal Univ. of Tenn. Div. of Cont. Education Info. Services Group PA146008@utkvm1.utk.edu
3965
From: koreth@spud.Hyperion.COM (Steven Grimm) Subject: Re: Opinions on Allergy (Hay Fever) shots? Organization: Hyperion, Mountain View, CA, USA Lines: 7 NNTP-Posting-Host: spud.hyperion.com I had allergy shots for about four years starting as a sophomore in high school. Before that, I used to get bloody noses, nighttime asthma attacks, and eyes so itchy I couldn't get to sleep. After about 6 months on the shots, most of those symptoms were gone, and they haven't come back. I stopped getting the shots (due more to laziness than planning) in college. My allergies got a little worse after that, but are still nowhere near as bad as they used to be. So yes, the shots do work.
3966
From: HURH@FNAL.FNAL.GOV (Patrick Hurh) Subject: Rayshade to DXF,RIB,etc.. (Strata)? Organization: FNAL Lines: 30 Distribution: world NNTP-Posting-Host: adnet13.fnal.gov I'm a mac user who wants to use some of the rayshade models I've built using macrayshade (rayshade-M) with Stratavision 3d. Since Stratavision can import many different model files I thought this would be a cinch... but I haven't been able to find a simple translator that will work on the mac. Any ideas? Stratavision 3d should be able to import: DXF MiniCAD Super 3d Swivel 3d professional out of the box and: RIB IGS with externals. Also, if anyone knows of any other translator externals available for Stratavision 3d (esp. Rayshade!) please e-mail me! BTW, I'm going to send mail to the rayshade usrs mailing list tomorrow (I misplaced the address) but since most users of rayshade do not seem to operate with macs, I'm not getting my hopes up... thanks in advance, --patrick. hurh@fnal.fnal.gov
3967
From: wtm@uhura.neoucom.edu (Bill Mayhew) Subject: Re: electronic odometers (was: Used BMW Question ..... ???) Organization: Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine Lines: 32 I consulted with someone working on an electronic odometer. The design was to use a microprocessor based system to write a somewhat ofuscated pattern into an EEPROM. The idea was to make the circuit difficult to program arbitrary values into the EEPROM. The secondary purpose, acutally the primary purpose from the standpoint of practicality, was to distributed the writes so as to avoid exceeing the maximum number of writes fof the EEPROM being used. The microprocessor also ignored pulses coming from the Hall effect at a rate any higher than 110 MPH so as to make spoofing the reading by bench pulsing at least somewhat undesirable. This was for an automobile that was not expected to ever exceed 110 MPH in operation. The case, of course, might not be the same for your 1993 RX-7! The ECM modules of some cars do indeed store info about conditions under which cars have been operated. Since steering angle and velocity data, etc is available it would not be difficult to collect all sorts of interesting demographic information about the drivers' use of the car. I am not aware of any manufacturer currently trying to enforce warranty restrictions based on reading out use data from the ECM. While it could be a potential invasion of your privacy for manufacturers to have access to data about your driving style, it could also provide valuable information from actual field use conditions to help engineer more appropriate cars. I personally wouldn't mind the dealer collecting my driving demographics as long as it is done in an anonymous fashion. -- Bill Mayhew NEOUCOM Computer Services Department Rootstown, OH 44272-9995 USA phone: 216-325-2511 wtm@uhura.neoucom.edu (140.220.1.1) 146.580: N8WED
3968
From: kolstad@cae.wisc.edu (Joel Kolstad) Subject: Re: Laser vs Bubblejet? Organization: U of Wisconsin-Madison College of Engineering Lines: 29 In article <1993Apr20.173742.99726@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu> hl00@ns1.cc.lehigh.edu (HOU-SHENG LIN) writes: >Well, I'm not too sure if this would be the right place to post this, but >anyway, here goes: I was just noticing that some of the current bubblejet >printers offers up to 360x360 resolution while a lot of lower end laser >printers only offer 300x300. However, the laser printers still seems to be >significantly pricier than the bubblejets... how is this? Or am I missing >something about the resolution thing? Bubblejets often splatter a little bit, whereas LaserJets (given half-way decent toner, like HP's "Microfine" stuff) don't. Both produce very good output, but you don't have to look too closely at the two to tell that LaserJet output is definitely superior. On the other hand, LaserJets which haven't been maintained properly and use the cheapest toner the owner could find often produce awful output, much worse than a bubblejet. :-) One other thing... there are bubblejets, and then there are BubbleJets. There are a few bubblejets out there that produce rather mediocre output (such as HP's dinky little BubbleJet), whereas most produce really good looking output (such as HP's DeskJets). IBM and Canon both produce some of the really good style bubblejets. ---Joel Kolstad P.S. -- If you're in the market for a portable bublejet printer, I can highly recommend the HP Portable DeskJet, although I've heard the portable Canons are good too (I needed PCL support, myself). With the DeskJet Portable, you even get an undocumented PCMCIA card slot!
3969
From: livesey@solntze.wpd.sgi.com (Jon Livesey) Subject: Re: islamic genocide Organization: sgi Lines: 48 Distribution: world NNTP-Posting-Host: solntze.wpd.sgi.com In article <1qjipo$pen@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de>, frank@D012S658.uucp (Frank O'Dwyer) writes: |> In article <1qinmd$sp@fido.asd.sgi.com> livesey@solntze.wpd.sgi.com (Jon Livesey) writes: |> #|> |> #|> At any rate, even if your interpretation is correct this does |> #|> not imply that the killings are religously motivated, which was |> #|> the original poster's seeming claim. |> # |> #Tricky, tricky. I'm replying to your blanket claim that they |> #are *not* religiously motivated. |> |> They aren't. Irish catholics in the south do not kill Irish protestants |> in the south, yet have precisely the same history behind them. Those |> who think the killings are religously motivated ignore the rather |> obvious matter of British occupation, partition and misguided patriotism |> on both sides. False dichotomy. You claimed the killing were *not* religiously motivated, and I'm saying that's wrong. I'm not saying that each and every killing is religiously motivate, as I spelled out in detail. |> |> The problems fault along the religious divide because at the historical |> roots of this thing we have a catholic country partitioned and populated |> by a protestant one. The grotesque killing of soldiers and |> civilians is supposedly motivated by patriotism, civil rights issues, and |> revenge. It's only difficult to understand insofaras insanity is hard |> to understand - religion need not be invoked to explain it. Does anyone else see the contradiction in this paragraph? |> #But to claim that "The killings in N.I are not religously |> #motivated." is grotesque. All that means is that the Church |> #and believers are doing what they always do with history |> #they can't face: they rewrite it. |> |> You're attacking a different claim. My claim is that when an IRA |> terrorist plants a bomb in Warrington s/he does not have as a motive |> the greater glory of God. Sorry, Frank, but what I put in quotes is your own words from your posting <1qi83b$ec4@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de>. Don't tell us now that it's a different claim. If you can no longer stand behind your original claim, just say so. jon.
3970
From: etxonss@ufsa.ericsson.se (Staffan Axelsson) Subject: WC 93: Scores and standings, April 20 Nntp-Posting-Host: uipc104.ericsson.se Organization: Ericsson Telecom, Stockholm, Sweden Lines: 72 1993 World Championships in Germany: ==================================== Group A standings (Munich) Group B standings (Dortmund) -------------------------- ---------------------------- GP W T L GF-GA +/- P GP W T L GF-GA +/- P Canada 2 2 0 0 6-1 +5 4 Czech republic 2 1 1 0 6-1 +5 3 Russia 2 1 1 0 6-4 +2 3 Finland 2 1 1 0 3-1 +2 3 Italy 2 1 1 0 3-2 +1 3 Germany 2 1 0 1 6-5 +1 2 Sweden 2 1 0 1 2-4 -2 2 USA 2 0 2 0 2-2 0 2 -------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Austria 2 0 0 2 2-5 -3 0 France 1 0 0 1 0-2 -2 0 Switzerland 2 0 0 2 0-3 -3 0 Norway 1 0 0 1 0-6 -6 0 April 18: Italy - Russia 2-2 Norway - Germany 0-6 Sweden - Austria 1-0 USA - Czech republic 1-1 April 19: Canada - Switzerland 2-0 Russia - Austria 4-2 Finland - France 2-0 April 20: Sweden - Canada 1-4 Czech republic - Germany 5-0 Switzerland - Italy 0-1 Finland - USA 1-1 April 21: Germany - France 15:30 Italy - Sweden Czech republic - Norway 20:00 April 22: Switzerland - Russia USA - France 15:30 Austria - Canada Norway - Finland 20:00 April 23: Switzerland - Austria Germany - Finland 20:00 April 24: Russia - Sweden Czech republic - France 15:30 Canada - Italy USA - Norway 20:00 April 25: Sweden - Switzerland Finland- Czech republic 15:30 Russia - Canada Germany - USA 20:00 April 26: Austria - Italy France - Norway 20:00 PLAYOFFS: ========= April 27: Quarterfinals A #2 - B #3 15:30 A #3 - B #2 20:00 April 28: Quarterfinals A #1 - B #4 15:30 A #4 - B #1 20:00 April 29: Relegation A #5 - B #6 15:30 A #6 - B #5 20:00 April 30: Semifinals A #1/B #4 - A #3/B #2 15:30 A #4/B #1 - A #2/B #3 20:00 May 1: Relegation 14:30 Bronze medal game 19:00 May 2: FINAL 15:00 -- ((\\ //| Staffan Axelsson \\ //|| etxonss@ufsa.ericsson.se \\_))//-|| r.s.h. contact for Swedish hockey
3971
From: gamet@erg.sri.com (Thomas Gamet) Subject: keyboard specifications Organization: SRI International, Menlo Park, CA Lines: 35 To all hardware and firmware gurus: My current home project is to build a huge paddle keyboard for a physically handicapped relative of mine. My goal is for this keyboard to look exactly like an AT sytle keyboard to its host system. This will be a highly endowed keyboard with a Little PCL from Z World at its heart. The only thing I lack is detailed information on the hardware signaling that the 486 (with Windows 3.1 and DOS 5.0) will be expecting. My project is independant of Windows, my hope is that some of you fellow Window's users/programmers will recognize what I need and be willing to point me in the right direction. I have The Winn L. Rosch Hardware Bible (2nd edition). The HB gives most (if not all) of the information I will need concerning scan codes and even a wire diagram for the PS/2 style connector I will need, but it leaves a number of important questions unanswered. 1. Is it synchronous or asynchronous serial communication? I'm guessing synchronous since the host is providing a clock. In either event, how is the data framed? 2. Is it half-duplex or truly one way? I'm guessing half-duplex since the host can turn LEDs on and off. 3. Are there any chipsets available for communicating with the "AT keyboard standard" (other than by cannibalizing a real keyboard)? If anyone knows of a book or article (or any other written source of information) on the above, please advise me at gamet@erg.sri.com. Whatever I do it must be safe for I cannot afford to replace the 486 in the event of a booboo. Thank you for your time. Danke fuer Ihre Zeit. Thomas Gamet (gamet@erg.sri.com) Software Engineer SRI International
3972
From: michael@jester.GUN.de (Michael Gerhards) Distribution: world Subject: Re: Modems and UARTs X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8] Organization: private COHERENT system Lines: 33 RYAN JEFFREY BAUCOM (rjbaucom@eos.ncsu.edu) wrote: > 1) What is a 16550 UART? I don't know the exact meaning of UART, but I think it is something like Universal Arithmetic Receiver Transmitter. Normally, the older boards have a 8250 or 16450 UART on board. Those chips generate an IRQ for every char they received. The 16550 UART has an internal 16 byte buffer, so - with the right software installed - it generates an IRQ every 16 chars. > 2) What does it do for high-speed modems? > 3) Is it necessary for 14.4k or higher throughput? If you ran dos, you don't need a 16550, because dos runs only ONE task at a time and the whole cpu-power could be used for the transfer. But if you are running a multitasking OS such as OS/2, Unix, etc. ( windows ? :-) ), the cpu cannot work the whole time with one task. The result are lost characters or broken transmissions because of timeouts. > 4) Is it only for internal modems? NO. The only diffrence is that internal modems have the UART on board, whereas external modems are connected to the computer over a serial port which has the UART on board. > If you have any experience with 9600 or higher speed modems, please > let me know what you think. Also, any particular brand name reccomended, > or will a cheapo clone do just a well? I use a Zyxel1496B with a 16550UART under COHERENT 4.0. I'm very satisfied with it but I think that nearly everyone is satisfied with his own modem. Michael -- * michael@jester.gun.de * Michael Gerhards * Preussenstrasse 59 * * Germany 4040 Neuss * Voice: 49 2131 82238 *
3973
From: maX <maX@maxim.rinaco.msk.su> Subject: Only test message Distribution: world Organization: Home Reply-To: maX@maxim.rinaco.msk.su Keywords: test Lines: 2 It's only test message.
3974
From: dshanks@nyx.cs.du.edu (David Shanks) Subject: Re: Quicken 6 vs. Tobias' Managing Your Money X-Disclaimer: Nyx is a public access Unix system run by the University of Denver for the Denver community. The University has neither control over nor responsibility for the opinions of users. Keywords: Quicken Tobias Organization: Nyx, Public Access Unix at U. of Denver Math/CS dept. Lines: 89 In article <1993Apr20.040449.19649@twg.com> q@twg.com (Michael Wiesenberg) writes: >Anyway, is anyone aware of a comparitive study of the two programs? >Or can someone just give me their own personal impressions? Maybe PC Magazine, January 12, 1993 had a review of several personal finance management programe, as did PC-Computing, January 1993. PC World, December 1992 also had articles about Quicken and Managing Your Money. I can email you copies of these articles if you can't find them at your library. I've been using Managing Your Money for several years, and I have several friends who use Quicken, though I've not used it myself. My overall impression is that Quicken is a financial accounts manager while Managing Your Money will help you more completely manage your finances. Here are some features that I believe Managing Your Money and Quicken share: The ability to keep records for each of your financial accounts: checking, savings, charge, cash, or brokerage. You can reconcile your account statements with the records the program keeps. The ability to make a budget and track your spending against that budget. A Checkfree module which will allow you to use the Checkfree bill paying service to pay your bills via your modem. The ability to print checks on your printer. The ability to keep loan records and set up automatic loan payments. The ability to import stock quotations to keep your brokerage accounts up to date. I know Managing Your Money can do this automatically via modem. Quicken probably can as well, but I'm not sure about it. The ability to export tax information to popular tax preparation programs. Here are some features that I believe Managing Your Money has that Quicken does not: A tax prediction module. This looks at your accounts and budget to predict your tax liability for the coming year. It's usefull to fine tune your withholding so Uncle Sam doesn't get his due too early. An insurance and vital records module. This is a place to keep records of your insurance policies as well as other vital records. It can also compute your life expectancy. A financial analysis module. This computes compound interest, effects of inflation, loan payments term or interest, yield to maturity for bonds, savings account yields, days between dates, and loan amortization schedules. It also has functions to help you decide whether to refinance your mortgage, whether you can afford a particular home, whether a particular rental property is a good investment, whether you should buy lease or rent, and whether a particular investment's cash flow is adequate for your situation. This module can also help you plan for retirement and for helping your kids with their tuition. A net worth module. This is a place to record all your assets and liabilities. Your net worth can be computed from this information. Any assets or liabilities recorded in other modules are automatically included here. A "desk" module. This includes a small word processor, a card file you can use to store names, addresses, phone numbers and other vital information about friends and associates, a perpetual calander, a rudimentary calculator, a to-do list, a reminder list, an appointment list, and a place to record your phone calls (for those who need to track such things). Your appointments, reminders and to-do list can be made to display automatically when you start the program. There are probably some things listed above that Quicken has, but I'm almost sure that Quicken doesn't do everything I've listed. If I'm wrong, I'm sure hordes of Quicken devotees will flame me to a crisp. One thing that Quicken has that Managing Your Money does not yet have is a Windows version. MECA software is rumored to be working on a Windows version of Managing Your Money for release late this year. I hope this information is of use to you. I've found Managing Your Money to be a very usefull program for keeping my financial records. On the other hand I know many people who are equally as happy with Quicken. If Quicken has all the features you need or want, I'd go with it. If you find any of the Managing Your Money features that Quicken doesn't have to be useful, I think it's well worth the price.
3975
From: wagner@grace.math.uh.edu (David Wagner) Subject: Re: Eternity of Hell (was Re: Hell) Organization: UH Dept of Math Lines: 27 "Darius" == Darius Lecointe <dlecoint@garnet.acns.fsu.edu> writes: Darius> vic@mmalt.guild.org (Vic Kulikauskas) writes: Darius> Let me suggest this. Maybe those who believe in the eternal Darius> hell theory should provide all the biblical evidence they can Darius> find for it. Stay away from human theories, and only take Darius> into account references in the bible. Like most topics, we've been through this one before, but here is a good start: Matthew 25:46: "Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life." I may post more on this subject when I have more time. In any case, it is clear that the fate of the damned is most unpleasant, and to be avoided. David Wagner "Sola Scriptura!" a confessional Lutheran [I'd like to suggest that discussions based on single quotations are a bad way to proceed. There are passages consistent with either theory. The sensible way to proceed is to look at them all, and see if we can come up with a view that encompasses all of them. --clh]
3976
Subject: MIT R5 on Sun with Rasterops TC Colorboard From: mark@comp.vuw.ac.nz (Mark Davies) Distribution: world Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Victoria Uni. of Wellington, New Zealand. NNTP-Posting-Host: bats.comp.vuw.ac.nz Lines: 9 Is it possible to run an MIT R5 based Xserver on a Sun with a Rasterops TC Colorboard (24bit board)? I have the Xsun24 patches for supporting sun's 24bit frame buffers but does the rasterops appear as if its a cgtwelve or something else? I know nothing about the rasterops other than we might be buying one to put in an IPX. cheers mark
3977
From: nrmendel@unix.amherst.edu (Nathaniel Mendell) Subject: Re: Bike advice Organization: Amherst College X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7] Lines: 11 Ummm...did you have any bikes other than that KX80? If not, I'd suggest you look for an '89 ZX-7, since they only have about 90 horsepower, whereas the '90 has over 100 and might be a bit much for you... Sincerely, Nathaniel ZX-10 DoD 0812 AMA
3978
From: pooder@rchland.vnet.ibm.com (Don Fearn) Subject: Re: Antifreeze/coolant Reply-To: pooder@msus1.msus.edu Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM Nntp-Posting-Host: garnet.rchland.ibm.com Organization: IBM Rochester Lines: 34 In article <1993Apr15.193938.8569@research.nj.nec.com>, behanna@syl.nj.nec.com (Chris BeHanna) writes: |> For those of you with motorcycles of the liquid-cooled persuasion, |> what brand of coolant do you use and why? I am looking for aluminum-safe |> coolant, preferably phosphate-free, and preferably cheaper than $13/gallon. |> (Can you believe it: the Kaw dealer wants $4.95 a QUART for the Official |> Blessed Holy Kawasaki Coolant!!! No way I'm paying that usury...) |> Prestone. I buy it at ShopKo for less than that a _gallon_. BMW has even more expensive stuff than Kawasaki (must be from grapes only grown in certain parts of the fatherland), but BMW Dave* said "Don't worry about it -- just change it yearly and keep it topped off". It's been keeping Gretchen happy since '87, so I guess it's OK. Kept my Rabbit's aluminum radiator hoppy for 12 years and 130,000 miles, too, so I guess it's aluminum safe. *Former owner of the late lamented Rochester BMW Motorcycles and all around good guy. -- Pooder - Rochester, MN - DoD #591 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "What Do *You* Care What Other People Think?" -- Richard Feynman ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I share garage space with: Gretchen - '86 K75 Harvey - '72 CB500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- << Note the different "Reply-To:" address if you want to send me e-mail>>
3979
From: rar@schooner.otra.COM (Rich Rollman) Subject: File Formats Organization: The Internet Lines: 15 To: xpert@expo.lcs.mit.edu Hi folks, Can anyone give me some information, the location of some information, or some reference material for the following file formats: WIFF, MO;DCA/IOCA, PCX. If this is not quite the appropriate place to ask such questions, please let me know a more appropriate one and accept my apologies in advance. Thanks for your help, Rich Rollman Dogleg Systems, Inc. (908) 389-9597
3980
From: uck@netcom.com (Tom Chamberlain) Subject: Buzz Aldrin's Race Into Space? Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) Lines: 6 Has anyone heard of or Played Buzz Aldrin's Race into Space? Does anyone know when it is expected to be released...? Thanx, Tom.
3981
From: gt0523e@prism.gatech.EDU (Michael Andre Mule) Subject: Re: Torre: The worst manager? Distribution: usa Organization: Georgia Institute of Technology Lines: 19 In article <93095@hydra.gatech.EDU> gt7469a@prism.gatech.EDU (Brian R. Landmann) writes: >Later, in the ninth inning with the bases loaded and two outs he puts >lankford, a 300 hitter with power in as a pinch runner and uses Luis >Alicea, a 250 hitter with no power as a pinch hitter. What the Hell >is he thinking. Didn't Alicea get a hit, though? See y'all at the ballyard Go Braves Chop Chop Michael Mule' -- Michael Andre Mule Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332 uucp: ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt0523e Internet: gt0523e@prism.gatech.edu
3982
From: vince@sscl.uwo.ca Subject: Binaca Blast Deep Drive Derby (BBDDD) Returns Organization: Social Science Computing Laboratory Distribution: na Nntp-Posting-Host: vaxr.sscl.uwo.ca Lines: 72 In article <1piisn$asq@network.ucsd.edu>, king@cogsci.ucsd.edu (Jonathan King) writes: > > A less well-publicized part of the now infamous Darrin Jackson for > Derek Bell trade was the fact that San Diego included $300,000 in the > deal. Even less publicized than this, however, was that the $300,000 > didn't come from the Padres, but from an un-named source, and that the > money didn't go to the Blue Jays. In Toronto, the money was diverted > into a London bank account owned by a shadowy character named Vincent > Gray. I should be so lucky: the account number must have been rejected! :-) > The odd thing was that Gray wasn't some British financier, but a > Canadian social scientist working at the University of Western > Ontario. Gray was previously known to the authorities only as an > associate of John Palmer, and as the man who had the previous year > discovered the True Tater Name of "Bing Bang Ben" MacDonald. To be accurate, it is "Big Bang Ben" MacDonald. > Soon after that, Gray and Palmer sent word to Ottawa that Canada had > achieved absolute superiority over the United States in the field of > baseballistic research, as she controlled both the Acker-Cook > Pitch-Alike Contest and the Binaca Blast Research Institute. The Prime > Minister smiled. I hope not. To think that I would inadvertantly give any pleasure to Mulroney _really_ ruins my day. PS: Matthew Wall: a marvellous ending to the section on the Expos. > Okay, so I'm not giving up the day job. But, in an effort to help me > keep the day job, I've managed to foist the job of running the Binaca > Blast Deep Drive Derby onto Vince Gray, to whom future Deep > Drive-related tidbits should be sent: > > VINCE@sscl.uwo.ca or VINCE@VAXI.SSCL.UWO.CA; please identify any messages with the subject line BBDDD > Vince can take this post as the cue to chime in about what he plans to > do as the new director of the Research Institute, and what kind of > body armor Ontarians are wearing this Spring. Meanwhile, I have to go > pick up that truckload of Denis Boucher cards I bought to fill in the > area behind our tool shed... > > jking Realizing the taterific importance of this work, John Palmer and I concluded that we might be able to pool some resources. I have not yet gone through the archives that Jonathan sent to me; when I do, I will send out an "official" introduction to the Deep Drive Derby. However, I wonder if we need to rename the project, now that the principal investigator and research archive have changed. Send your suggestions for a rename of the study to me, at the address given above. And, just think: it's opening day. Soon, the balls will be flying out (no, get your minds out of the gutter) of the ball parks, and helpless bystanders will be injured by balls reentering the atmosphere. (and you thought that meteorite showers were made of rocks!) Who will be the stars this year? Can anyone hope to combat Brad Arnsberg's record start to last year? The season is young, the balls newly rubbed in mud, the hot dogs starting to boil for the rest of the year. Play ball (and take cover). And may all your sliders hang. Vince.
3983
From: u9126619@athmail1.causeway.qub.ac.uk Subject: Could anyone answer this question??? Organization: Free University of Berlin, Germany Lines: 41 Cc: u9126619@athmail1.causeway.qub.ac.uk I've heard it said that the accounts we have of Christs life and ministry in the Gospels were actually written many years after the event. (About 40 years or so). Is this correct?? If so, why the big time delay?? I know all scripture is inspired of God, so the time of writing is I suppose un-important, but I still can't help be curious! --------------------------------------------------- Ivan Thomas Barr Contact me at u9126619@athmail1.causeway.qub.ac.uk [The Gospels aren't dated, so we can only guess. Luke's prolog is about the only thing we have from the author describing his process. The prolog sounds like Luke is from the next generation, and had to do some investigating. There are traditions passed down verbally that say a few things about the composition of the Gospels. There are debates about how reliable these traditions are. They certainly don't have the status of Scripture, yet scholars tend to take some of them seriously. One suggests that Mark was based on Peter's sermons, and was written to preserve them when Peter had died or way about to die. One tradition about Matthew suggests that a collection of Jesus words may have been made earlier than the current Gospels. In the ancient world, it was much more common to rely on verbal transmission of information. I think many people would have preferred to hear about Jesus directly from someone who had known him, and maybe even from someone who studied directly under such a person, rather than from a book. Thus I suspect that the Gospels are largely from a period when these people were beginning to die. Scholars generally do think there was some written material earlier, which was probably used as sources for the existing Gospels. Establishing the dates is a complex and technical business. I have to confess that I'm not sure how much reliance I'd put on the methods used. But it's common to think that Mark was written first, around 64 AD., and that all of the Gospels were written by the end of the Century. A few people vary this by a decade or so one way or the other. --clh]
3984
From: tobias@convex.com (Allen Tobias) Subject: Re: WARNING.....(please read)... Nntp-Posting-Host: hydra.convex.com Organization: CONVEX Computer Corporation, Richardson, Tx., USA X-Disclaimer: This message was written by a user at CONVEX Computer Corp. The opinions expressed are those of the user and not necessarily those of CONVEX. Lines: 24 In article <1993Apr15.024246.8076@Virginia.EDU> ejv2j@Virginia.EDU ("Erik Velapoldi") writes: >This happened about a year ago on the Washington DC Beltway. >Snot nosed drunken kids decided it would be really cool to >throw huge rocks down on cars from an overpass. Four or five >cars were hit. There were several serious injuries, and sadly >a small girl sitting in the front seat of one of them was struck >in the head by one of the larger rocks. I don't recall if she >made it, but I think she was comatose for a month or so and >doctors weren't holding out hope that she'd live. > >What the hell is happening to this great country of ours? I >can see boyhood pranks of peeing off of bridges and such, but >20 pound rocks??! Has our society really stooped this low?? > >Erik velapold Society, as we have known it, it coming apart at the seams! The basic reason is that human life has been devalued to the point were killing someone is "No Big Deal". Kid's see hundreds on murderous acts on TV, we can abort children on demand, and kill the sick and old at will. So why be surprised when some kids drop 20 lbs rocks and kill people. They don't care because the message they hear is "Life is Cheap"! AT
3985
From: "Mohammad Al-Ansari" <alansari@mango.ucs.indiana.edu> Subject: CACHE or Micronics EISA/VLB Motherboard? Organization: Indiana University Computer Science, Bloomington Lines: 27 This might be a silly question but I have to ask it anyway. I am in the process of purchasing an EISA/VL Bus 486 DX2-66 computer and I found two places that sell machines that have what I want and have the same price. The first is Ares and they use a Cache motherboard (that's the brand of the motherboard) with OPTI chip set, the other is Micron (formerly Edge Technology) and they use the Micronics EISA/VLB motherboard. I said that this might be a silly question since I believe that Micronics is a very well known motherboard manufacturer while I never heard of Cache! I am however leaning towards the Ares machine because my impression is that they are known for building good, solid machines and they have good tech support (24 hr, 7 days/wk), and a better warrantee (2 years). Micron, on the other hand, seems to have recently aquired Edge Technologies and I'm not sure how much I should trust the company. I would REALLY appreciate any input on this. Is the Micron machine the clear choice? Does anyone know anything positive or negative about either company? Has anyone ever heard of Cache motherboards? Should I go with Micron just because it has the Micronics motherboard? etc. Thanks very much in advance for any information. -- Mohammad Al-Ansari
3986
From: perlman@qso.Colorado.EDU (Eric S. Perlman) Subject: Re: Final Solution for Gaza ? Summary: Davidsson can't even get the most basic facts right. Nntp-Posting-Host: qso.colorado.edu Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder Lines: 27 In article <1483500354@igc.apc.org> Center for Policy Research <cpr@igc.apc.org> writes: > >[...] >The Gaza strip, this tiny area of land with the highest population >density in the world, has been cut off from the world for weeks. >The Israeli occupier has decided to punish the whole population of >Gaza, some 700.000 people, by denying them the right to leave the >strip and seek work in Israel. Anyone who can repeate this choice piece of tripe without checking his/her sources does not deserve to be believed. The Gaza strip does not possess the highest population density in the world. In fact, it isn't even close. Just one example will serve to illustrate the folly of this statement: the city of Hong Kong has nearly ten times the population of the Gaza strip in a roughly comparable land area. The centers of numerous cities also possess comparable, if not far higher, population densities. Examples include Manhattan Island (NY City), Sao Paolo, Ciudad de Mexico, Bombay,... Need I go on? The rest of Mr. Davidsson's message is no closer to the truth than this oft-repeated statement is. -- "How sad to see/A model of decorum and tranquillity/become like any other sport A battleground for rival ideologies to slug it out with glee." -Tim Rice,"Chess" Eric S. Perlman <perlman@qso.colorado.edu> Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, University of Colorado, Boulder
3987
From: bobbe@vice.ICO.TEK.COM (Robert Beauchaine) Subject: Re: Morality? (was Re: <Political Atheists?) Organization: Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, Or. Lines: 15 In article <1ql667INN54a@gap.caltech.edu> keith@cco.caltech.edu (Keith Allan Schneider) writes: > >What I've been saying is that moral behavior is likely the null behavior. Do I smell .sig material here? /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Bob Beauchaine bobbe@vice.ICO.TEK.COM They said that Queens could stay, they blew the Bronx away, and sank Manhattan out at sea. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
3988
From: craigs@srgenprp.sr.hp.com (Craig Stelter) Subject: Re: Defensive Averages 1988-1992, Third Base Organization: HP Sonoma County (SRSD/MWTD/MID) X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL9.2] Lines: 37 Dale Stephenson (steph@cs.uiuc.edu) wrote: : In <C5JJrJ.EM3@cs.uiuc.edu> steph@cs.uiuc.edu (Dale Stephenson) writes: : >Compiled from the last five Defensive Average reports, here are the career : >DAs for the individual players in the reports. Stats are courtesy of : >Sherri Nichols. Players are listed in descending order. : And some comments, with some players deleted. : >Third Basemen : >------------- : >Leius, Scott ---- ---- ---- .653 .680 0.672 : Looks good. Too bad he's moving to short. : >Pagliarulo, Mike .631 ---- .575 .744 ---- 0.649 : This is an interesting line. His 1988 figure was slightly below average. : His 1990 was pathetic, and his 1991 was the next best year by anybody. Part of : that may be his mobility. 1988 was with the Yankees. 1990 was with the : Padres, who appear to have a rotten infield. 1991 was with the Twins, and : judging by Leius and Gaetti, the Metrodome may be a good place to play : third. Gaetti, Gary .616 .638 .655 .632 ---- 0.637 Apologies if I don't know what I'm talking about :-), but as a Twins fan, I like to think they have good players in any park. Not sure if I remember completely or not, but I think Gaetti played with the Twins in '87 for the world series, and again in '88 (note that's his lowest of the 4). I believe the next 3 (or at least the last two) were played with the Angels. Lots of factors make a player excell... I hate it when so many use the dome. It may not be ideal, but nice to comfortably enjoy baseball and football even when it's snowing and raining. -Craig I'm sure the company for which I work does not have all the same opinions that I do...
3989
From: fcrary@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (Frank Crary) Subject: Re: Gun Control (was Re: We're Mad as Hell at the TV News) Nntp-Posting-Host: ucsu.colorado.edu Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder Distribution: na Lines: 59 In article <C4u3x5.Fw7@magpie.linknet.com> manes@magpie.linknet.com (Steve Manes) writes: >I don't know how anyone can state that gun control could have NO >effect on homicide rates. I don't think anyone is arguing that there would be no effect. But there would be no _net_ _positive_ effect. You also have to consider the negative side: Law abiding citizens, armed with fireamrs (pistols for the most part), prevent between 80,000 (National Crime Survey) and 1,000,000 (Dr. Kleck) crimes each year. (Those are the extremes. Most studies find the number to be 500,000 to 600,000.) About 1% of those crimes are homicides, so private ownership of firearms _saves_ approximately 5,000 lives each year. There are roughly 12,000 criminal homicides and fatal accidents involving guns each year. For there to be any net benefit, you would have to show that gun control measures would disarm over 40% of the criminals currently using guns. That would be very hard to do: According the the federal BATF, only 8% of criminals buy their guns over the counter. Since gun control laws, by their very nature, only effect legal sales, such a law would remove all the benefits of armed, law-abiding citizens while having only a minimal effect on armed criminals (who, by and large, get their guns illegally.) That doesn't sound like a net benefit to me. >...There were over 250 >accidental< handgun >homicides in America in 1990, most with licensed weapons. Since most were with licensed weapons, I assume you are not supporting "reasonable" laws (i.e. waiting periods, background checks, licenses, etc...). Since only a complete ban would alter the statistic you refer to, I assume that's what you are supporting. By the way, 1135 people dies in 1986 from falling down stairs. 250 accidental handgun deaths isn't significant next to other household accidents. >...More >American children accidentally shot other children last year (15) >than all the handgun homicides in Great Britain. 1080 children under the age of 10 died by drowning, 69 from drinking poisonous household chemicals (like Drano), 139 from falls. If the real goal is to reduce the tragic, accidental deaths of children, wouldn't a ban on drain cleaners be a better palce to start? (Or, perhaps, restricting ownership to professionals like plumbers?) >...Please... no dictionary arguments about RATES vs >TOTAL NUMBERS, okay? They're offered for emphasis, not comparison). While you might call it "emphasis", refering to completely two statistics in the same sentence _implies_ a comparison. If it isn't valid, and you put the numbers together to convince people you are right, the kindest thing I could call it is propaganda. Frank Crary CU Boulder
3990
From: jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Josh Hopkins) Subject: Vandalizing the sky Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana Lines: 50 yamauchi@ces.cwru.edu (Brian Yamauchi) writes: >enzo@research.canon.oz.au (Enzo Liguori) writes: >>WHAT'S NEW (in my opinion), Friday, 16 April 1993 Washington, DC >>1. SPACE BILLBOARDS! IS THIS ONE THE "SPINOFFS" WE WERE PROMISED? >>In 1950, science fiction writer Robert Heinlein published "The >>Man Who Sold the Moon," which involved a dispute over the sale of >>rights to the Moon for use as billboard. NASA has taken the firsteps toward this >>hideous vision of the future. Observers were >>startled this spring when a NASA launch vehicle arrived at the >>pad with "SCHWARZENEGGER" painted in huge block letters on the >>side of the booster rockets. Space Marketing Inc. had arranged >>for the ad to promote Arnold's latest movie. >Well, if you're going to get upset with this, you might as well direct >some of this moral outrage towards Glavcosmos as well. They pioneered >this capitalist application of booster adverts long before NASA. In fact, you can all direct your ire at the proper target by ingoring NASA altogether. The rocket is a commercial launch vechicle - a Conestoga flying a COMET payload. NASA is simply the primary customer. I believe SDIO has a small payload as well. The advertising space was sold by the owners of the rocket, who can do whatever they darn well please with it. In addition, these anonymous "observers" had no reason to be startled. The deal made Space News at least twice. >>Now, Space Marketing >>is working with University of Colorado and Livermore engineers on >>a plan to place a mile-long inflatable billboard in low-earth >>orbit. >>NASA would provide contractual launch services. However, >>since NASA bases its charge on seriously flawed cost estimates >>(WN 26 Mar 93) the taxpayers would bear most of the expense. >>Is NASA really supporting this junk? >And does anyone have any more details other than what was in the WN >news blip? How serious is this project? Is this just in the "wild >idea" stage or does it have real funding? I think its only fair to find that out before everyone starts having a hissy fit. The fact that they bothered to use the conditional tense suggests that it has not yet been approved. -- Josh Hopkins jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu "Find a way or make one." -attributed to Hannibal
3991
From: gwm@spl1.spl.loral.com (Gary W. Mahan) Subject: Re: It's a rush... (was Re: Too fast) Organization: Loral Software Productivity Laboratory Lines: 12 >Why should a good driver be terrified at 130mph? The only thing I fear >going at 130 are drivers, who switch to the left lane without using >either rear-view-mirror or flashers. Doing 130 to 150 ain't a rush >for me, but it's fun and I get where I want to go much faster. In defense of the drivers, who are in the right lane. Here in the states, people simply do not expect when they are driving to be overtaken at a speed differential of 50+mph. I don't think this is because they are stupid (of course, there are exceptions), they are just programmed because of the 55mph limit. Do you (in the states) when you look in the rear-view ALWAYS calculate future positions of cars based on a 50+ speed differential. Dont get me wrong, I love to drive in the left lane fast but when I overtake cars who are on the right, I slow down a tad bit. If I were to rely on the judgement of the other car, to recognize the speed differential, I would be the stupid one. BTW, If no one else is around, then GO FOR IT!.
3992
From: strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) Subject: Re: Once tapped, your code is no good any more. Organization: DSI/USCRPAC Distribution: na Lines: 26 In article <ELEE9SF.93Apr21095141@menudo.menudo.UH.EDU> elee9sf@menudo.menudo.UH.EDU (Karl Barrus) writes: > >Would you trust a black-box from the NSA versus an "open system" from >elsewhere? Absolutely, if I were assured by someone I trusted that the black box was more secure. I have nothing to conceal from the government, but I would like to be sure that any Russian, Japanese, French, or other competitors for my services can't read my traffic. I'd like to be sure that competitive bid information was safe from commercial competitors and foreign governments which would aid them. I believe the NSA has identical motivations with respect to my activities. The President and many other senior government officials have made it very clear that they share these motivations. Thus I'd trust them on the "coincidence of interests" argument as well as on a basic trust in their professionalism and a high confidence in their skills. David -- David Sternlight Great care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of our information, errors and omissions excepted.
3993
From: ktj@beach.cis.ufl.edu (kerry todd johnson) Subject: army in space Organization: Univ. of Florida CIS Dept. Lines: 17 Distribution: world NNTP-Posting-Host: beach.cis.ufl.edu Is anybody out there willing to discuss with me careers in the Army that deal with space? After I graduate, I will have a commitment to serve in the Army, and I would like to spend it in a space-related field. I saw a post a long time ago about the Air Force Space Command which made a fleeting reference to its Army counter-part. Any more info on that would be appreciated. I'm looking for things like: do I branch Intelligence, or Signal, or other? To whom do I voice my interest in space? What qualifications are necessary? Etc, etc. BTW, my major is computer science engineering. Please reply to ktj@reef.cis.ufl.edu Thanks for ANY info. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= = Whether they ever find life there or not, I think Jupiter should be = = considered an enemy planet. -- Jack Handy = ---ktj@reef.cis.ufl.edu---cirop59@elm.circa.ufl.edu---endeavour@circa.ufl.edu--
3994
From: nelson@seahunt.imat.com (Michael Nelson) Subject: Re: extraordinary footpeg engineering Nntp-Posting-Host: seahunt.imat.com Organization: SeaHunt, San Francisco CA Lines: 18 In article <1qt19d$2fj@vtserf.cc.vt.edu> ranck@joesbar.cc.vt.edu (Wm. L. Ranck) writes: >exb0405@csdvax.csd.unsw.edu.au wrote: > >Let me guess. You were making a left turn, correct? The edge of the stud >contacting the road caused it to turn and unthread itself. If you had >been making a right turn it would have tightened the stud. Bzzzt! Thanks for playing. If he'd been making a right turn, the sucker would have been a couple feet off the ground. Michael -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Michael Nelson 1993 CBR900RR | | Internet: nelson@seahunt.imat.com Dod #0735 | +-------------------------------------------------------------+
3995
From: king@cogsci.ucsd.edu (Jonathan King) Subject: Re: Zane!!Rescue us from Simmons!! Organization: University of California, San Diego Lines: 120 Distribution: na NNTP-Posting-Host: cogsci.ucsd.edu Summary: oh please, it's way too early to get upset. Mamatha Devineni Ratnam <mr47+@andrew.cmu.edu> writes: >So far Simmons looks like a total idiot. Whatever you say. I think it's just 12 games into the season myself, so I'm going to wait a bit before calling names. >2) I am sure Simmons was ready to say I told you so after Otto had an >impressive win last week. Now Otto's latest debacle has restored Simmons' >reputation. Now he looks like he is back in his '92 form when he had the >AL's highest ERA among starters. Four our sake(not Ted's sake), I hope he >pitches with a 3.5 ERA for the rest of the season. Yeah, right. I expect that Dave Otto will be a really bad pitcher, and I have no idea why Simmons ever wanted him. On the other hand, I expect him to release Otto if he doesn't turn things around pretty fast. (BTW, Otto's game score for that 0 IP stinker was only 22, which points out a problem with the method since Otto's performance was infinitely bad, and excruciatingly prolonged.) >3) Tomlin and Merced are a bit disappointing. They are still doing decently. >But considering the considerable amount of talent and maturity they have >shown their first seasons, they seem to have actually gotten a little >bit worse. I think Merced's rookie year was a bit flukey, but aren't you willing to give him some more at bats (and Tomlin a few more starts) before acting so gloomy? >4) Walk: Well, he seems to be on the losing end tonight. BUt I still think >that Walk desrved his contract. No he didn't. Walk is a time bomb. He has no stuff whatsoever, and when the league finally realizes this, it won't be pretty at all. >8) The Rookie batters: Well, Young has surprised me a bit with his >instant impact. Other than that, their excellent performance hasn't >been too much of a surprise. I think we should thank Doughty for that. Don't be so fast. Doughty is the guy who signed Steve Buechele, which was a move that threatened to bury Kevin Young in the minors. Meanwhile, I'm not sure whether Doughty or Simmons signed Martin as a six-year free agent before the 1992 season. >9) Rookie Pitchers: Worse than expected, especially Cooke. Twice through the rotation, and you've given up? Yikes. >10) Slaught: How come he wasn't given a contract extension last year? >Now his value has increased immensely. But so has his age, at least in baseball terms. The useful half-life of a 34- year-old injury-prone catcher can't be much longer than a year. >11) Lonnie Smith!! Well, Eric Davis was signed for a comparable amount. But he wanted to be a Dodger, and felt he had something to prove after his disastrous 1992. I don't think there was any chance for the Bucs to sign him. >Let's see. Eric can hit better. He can run better. He can field better. >Now why didnt the PIrates go after Eric Davis. An injured Davis is better >than a healthy Lonnie Smith. He certainly wasn't last year. >Even if Lonnnie Smith gets some big hits this year,he won't be an asset. >He has looked terrible on the bases and in the field. Hey, that's the "Skates Smith" package deal. Anybody who acquires Lonnie for his defense or base-running (particularly at this stage) is a real weirdo. >12) Management: BIG BIG ZERO. Sauer has yet to make a forceful argument >in favor of revenue sharing. He seems more concerned about pleasing that >idiot Danforth by preparing the team for a move to Tampa Bay. If that's the goal of the team ownership, than I don't see why Sauer gets a zero for making his boss happy. I don't know what he has or hasn't said about revenue sharing, so I can't comment there. >13) Alex Cole fiasco. > [stuff deleted] >Ironically, the biggest accomplishment of Simmons' tenure was >getting Alex Cole really cheap. Too bad. [that he gave him away in the >expansion draft.] It's annoying, but since Leyland seems to have been pushing for them to retain Jeff King, it was probably unavoidable. Meanwhile, I think bigger accomplishments of Simmons' tenure were getting some value for John Smiley, not trading real prospects for veterans down the stretch last year, drafting well in 1992, letting the rookies show something in 1993. Foley, Smith, and Candelaria were acquired to be replacement parts, which means that even if fail it hasn't done serious damage to the Bucs' future. >14) Compensatory draft picks for Bonds: Forget it. The pirates can rant >and rave. they will not get those picks. As of now, the issue is still >being appealed. Does this mean that the Bucs lost the initial arbitration case? I never heard the outcome of this. When will the final verdict be in on this? >Now, if this doesnt convince anyone that Simmons and Sauer are idiots, >nothing else will. I'm not sure who was the idiot in this case, so I don't know who to blame. It might have been Doug Danforth, after all. In fact, I *seriously* suspect it was Doug Danforth, who has shown his willingness to call the shots at exactly those moments when the gun is pointed at his feet. (btw--I've wondered whether my latest posts have been getting off-site, so if somebody known to impersonate e.e. cummings can see this, would he drop me a short note?) jking
3996
From: tonyo@pendragon.CNA.TEK.COM (Tony Ozrelic) Subject: Need info on cc:Mail file format Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Redmond, Oregon Lines: 13 I need the file format for cc:Mail file formats - it seems to be PCX-based, but with a twist: only the first page of a multi-page fax will come out readable. The other pages disappear. The format seems to be 'proprietary'. Anybody got any clues? I have to give my email FAXes to my secretary in order to get 'em unscrambled. I want a filter from cc:Mail to .p[nb]m. Come to think of it, p[nb]m to cc:Mail would be nice too. tonyo@master.CNA.TEK.COM
3997
From: j3david@sms.business.uwo.ca (James David) Subject: Plus minus stat Organization: University of Western Ontario Nntp-Posting-Host: sms.business.uwo.ca Lines: 165 >Post: 51240 of 51243 >Newsgroups: rec.sport.hockey >From: maynard@ramsey.cs.laurentian.ca (Roger Maynard) >Subject: Re: Plus minus stat >Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Laurentian University, >Sudbury, ON Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1993 01:59:36 GMT <discussion deleted> >>>Good for you. You'd only be displaying your ignorance of >>>course, but to each his own... >> >>Roger, I'm not sure here, but I think "ignorance" is really a >>function of "a lack of knowledge" and not "formulating an >>opinion"...but hey, if you need to take a cheap shot, then by >>all means go ahead...that's if it makes you feel better. >To knowledgeable observers of the game my meaning is obvious. >Your hockey education is not my responsibility. MY HOCKEY EDUCATION? What the f--- are you talking about? I'm not even going to try to refute this absolutely insane statement. >>My word, such vehemence against poor ol' Bob Gainey. Why does >>he bother you so much...he was an effective player for his >>style of play. >He was just another player. To laud him as anything more I find >bothersome. I hated the Habs. I hated Lafleur until I realized >that he was likely the most aesthetically pleasing player to >ever skate in my lifetime. Why would anyone talk about Gainey? "I hate the Habs" ?...you sound like a 10-year old. This statement is just further exemplifies your total inability to argue objectively about hockey. Don't give me this crap about "cogent arguments"...I've yet to read something of yours that is cogent. You consistently argue with: (1) emotion; (2) huge, sweeping statements Frankly, you have a very unconvincing style. I'm not defending Bob Gainey...frankly, I don't care for him all that much. But your dismissal of him as something less than an effective hockey player is tiresome...it has no basis in anything. How many Calders did he win? I think it was four (go ahead and refresh my memory). What about the Conn Smythe? Was that a fluke? Yeah, not the makings of a hockey superstar, I know, but try to have a reason, any reason, to shoot him down. >>>go around. Who would you rather have as your "checking" >>>centre? Doug Gilmour or Doug Jarvis? For that matter I would >>>take either Gretzky or Mario as my "checking" centres. Do you >>>think Gretzky could cover Bob Gainey? >>I'm really sorry Roger, but you have lost me completely here. >>Why don't you ask me if I would rather have Jesus Christ, >>himself, in nets? >Did he play hockey at a high level? Was he any good? If not, >why would you bother to bring JC up? I am talking about hockey >players here. If you can't follow the conversation don't follow >up. As I said previously, it is not my responsibility to >educate you. Hey cowboy! You're the "expert" who introduced the idiotic comparison of Gainey with Gretzky and Lemieux...you figure it out. >>Now, if you were to compare, say for example, Bob Gainey with >>Guy Carbonneau, you would have a balanced comparison. >Sure. Two journeymen. Big deal. Neither one of them is worth >discussing. How many individual awards between them? Eight...I don't remember (once again, please feel free to refresh my memory...and try to be as sarcastic as possible about my "hockey education"). >I'm wrong AGAIN...hmmm, let's see...where was I wrong in the >>>I would take Fuhr and Sanderson off of the latter. OH MY GOD!!! Did I say that? Roger...what's your point? Fuhr is a goaltender, goaltender's don't "plug"...in his prime, he was one of the best. Sanderson was a scrapper...if you stick him on you may as well include half the Flyers team of the same era. >>first place? I'm only guessing here, Rog, but I have a feeling >>that you've setup a "You're wrong again" macro key on your >>machine. >That is an excellent idea and if I decide to waste any more time >responding to any of your, or Greg's, postings then I will be >sure to implement that very macro. Oh Roger, you shouldn't...really. I don't deserve this...you are far too accomodating already. >>I would suggest that your comment: "And when the press runs out >>of things to say about the stars on dynasties they start to >>hype the pluggers. Grant Fuhr, Essa Tikkannen, Butch Goring, >>Bob Nystrom, Bob Gainey, Doug Jarvis, Derek Sanderson, Wayne >>Cashman, Bob Baun, Bob Pulford, Ralph Backstrom, Henri Richard, >>Dick Duff...and so on..." demonstrates a blanket disregard for >>these individuals as contributors to the game...so yes, settle >>down...nobody has claimed that they are hockey gods. >Tarasov claimed that Gainey was a "hockey god." And Greg ate >it up. And that is what this thread is all about. If you didn't >know that then why are you responding? You seem to have allowed all of these other players fall into your sweeping, vacuous statement...that's why. If you want to debate Gainey, go ahead...but why bring up everybody else? How does it support your argument? Do you have an argument, or do you just like to throw around a few names hoping to impress us? >And as for "blanket disregard for these individuals", I can >remember Leaf teams, purely populated by such "individuals", >winning four Stanley Cups. Teams. No one ran around telling >us that George Armstrong was the best hockey player in the >world. Great. I couldn't agree more. The Flyers won two cups for the same reasons...deservedly so. So what? I don't get it. Are you angry that the Leafs didn't get more recognition? You seem to think these pluggers are "hyped"...I don't agree...plain and simple. If you're last statement is some sort of compromise, fair enough. >>>You might consider developing your own style. After all, >>>imitation is the sincerest form of flattery and I am quite >>>sure that flattery is not your intention. >> >>C'mon...it has a nice ring to it...and admit it, you had a good >>laugh. >Right. I had to get to the end of your posting before I >realized you were a complete joke. Not a pleasant bone in your body, eh Rog? Why are you so unhappy? Not getting invited to enough parties? What? >In the future, if you are going to respond to my postings I >would appreciate it if you could present a cogent argument >supported by facts gleaned from a version of reality that most >of the rest of us would recognize. Roger, why are you under the impression that responding to your posts is some great honour? You really should stop...it sounds a little bit pathetic. Frankly, it's about as honourable as a good fart. congenially, as always, jd -- James David j3david@student.business.uwo.ca/s j3david@sms.business.uwo.ca (James David) Western Business School -- London, Ontario
3998
From: spbach@lerc.nasa.gov (James Felder) Subject: Re: some thoughts. Organization: NASA Lewis Resaerch Center Lines: 100 Distribution: world Reply-To: spbach@lerc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Host: hopper3.lerc.nasa.gov In article 734849678@saturn.wwc.edu, bissda@saturn.wwc.edu (DAN LAWRENCE BISSELL) writes: -> First I want to start right out and say that I'm a Christian. It ->makes sense to be one. Have any of you read Tony Campollo's book- liar, ->lunatic, or the real thing? (I might be a little off on the title, but he ->writes the book. Anyway he was part of an effort to destroy Christianity, ->in the process he became a Christian himself. Sounds like you are saying he was a part of some conspiracy. Just what organization did he belong to? Does it have a name? -> The book says that Jesus was either a liar, or he was crazy ( a ->modern day Koresh) or he was actually who he said he was. Logic alert - artificial trifercation. The are many other possible explainations. Could have been that he never existed. There have been some good points made in this group that is not impossible that JC is an amalgam of a number of different myths, Mithra comes to mind. -> Some reasons why he wouldn't be a liar are as follows. Who would ->die for a lie? Wouldn't people be able to tell if he was a liar? People ->gathered around him and kept doing it, many gathered from hearing or seeing ->someone who was or had been healed. Call me a fool, but I believe he did ->heal people. Logic alert - argument from incredulity. Just because it is hard for you to believe this doesn't mean that it isn't true. Liars can be very pursuasive, just look at Koresh that you yourself site. He has followers that don't think he is a fake and they have shown that they are willing to die. By not giving up after getting shot himself, Koresh has shown that he too is will to die for what he believes. As far as healing goes. If I rememer right the healing that was attributed is not consistent between the different gospels. In one of them the healing that is done is not any more that faith healers can pull off today. Seems to me that the early gospels weren't that compeling, so the stories got bigger to appeal better. -> Niether was he a lunatic. Would more than an entire nation be drawn ->to someone who was crazy. Very doubtful, in fact rediculous. For example ->anyone who is drawn to David Koresh is obviously a fool, logical people see ->this right away. -> Therefore since he wasn't a liar or a lunatic, he must have been the ->real thing. Or might not have existed, or any number of things. That is the logical pitfall that those who use flawed logic like this fall into. There are bifurcations (or tri, quad, etc) that are valid, because in the proceeding steps, the person shows conclusively that the alternatives are all that are possible. Once everyone agrees that the given set is indeed all there are, then arguments among the alternatives can be presentent, and one mostly likely to be true can be deduced by excluding all other possible alternatives. However, if it can be shown that the set is not all inclusive, then any conclusions bases on the incomplete set are invalid, even if the true choice is one of the original choices. I have given at least one valid alternative, so the conclusion that JC is the real McCoy just because he isn't one of the other two alternative is no longer valid. -> Some other things to note. He fulfilled loads of prophecies in ->the psalms, Isaiah and elsewhere in 24 hrs alone. This in his betrayal ->and Crucifixion. I don't have my Bible with me at this moment, next time I ->write I will use it. JC was a rabbi. He knew what those prophecies were. It wouldn't be any great shakes to make sure one does a list of actions that would fullfill prophecy. What would be compeling is if there were a set of clear and explicit prophecies AND JC had absolutely NO knowledge of then, yet fullfilled them anyway. -> I don't think most people understand what a Christian is. It ->is certainly not what I see a lot in churches. Rather I think it ->should be a way of life, and a total sacrafice of everything for God's ->sake. He loved us enough to die and save us so we should do the ->same. Hey we can't do it, God himself inspires us to turn our lives ->over to him. That's tuff and most people don't want to do it, to be a ->real Christian would be something for the strong to persevere at. But ->just like weight lifting or guitar playing, drums, whatever it takes ->time. We don't rush it in one day, Christianity is your whole life. ->It is not going to church once a week, or helping poor people once in ->a while. We box everything into time units. Such as work at this ->time, sports, Tv, social life. God is above these boxes and should be ->carried with us into all these boxes that we have created for ->ourselves. Here I agree with you. Anyone who buys into this load of mythology should take what it says seriously, and what it says is that it must be a total way of life. I have very little respect for Xians that don't. If the myth is true, then it is true in its entirity. The picking and choosing that I see a lot of leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Jim --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- James L. Felder | Sverdrup Technology,Inc. | phone: 216-891-4019 NASA Lewis Research Center | Cleveland, Ohio 44135 | email: jfelder@lerc.nasa.gov "Some people drink from the fountain of knowledge, other people gargle" -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
3999
From: Mike_Peredo@mindlink.bc.ca (Mike Peredo) Subject: Re: "Fake" virtual reality Organization: MIND LINK! - British Columbia, Canada Lines: 11 The most ridiculous example of VR-exploitation I've seen so far is the "Virtual Reality Clothing Company" which recently opened up in Vancouver. As far as I can tell it's just another "chic" clothes spot. Although it would be interesting if they were selling "virtual clothing".... E-mail me if you want me to dig up their phone # and you can probably get some promotional lit. MP (8^)-