Render request — held-out benchmark, 10 tasks × 20 demos
Everything needed is in this folder. Read the attempt lists here, upload the rendered output here.
What: re-render 200 existing demonstrations (10 tasks × 20 attempts) for the default Franka, at the stage1_5k camera rig.
Why re-render: these demonstrations currently exist only at a superseded camera rig. The
pretraining corpus (stage1_5k_camera_fixed) uses a different one, and this benchmark evaluates
models pretrained on it — so a mismatch would give every evaluated model a train/eval viewpoint
gap rather than measuring the model.
1. The camera rig — must match exactly
Verified identical across sampled tasks of Franka-Datasets-v2-5k-LIBERO and
Franka-Datasets-v2-30k-LIBERO. Machine-readable copy: camera_rig.json.
| value | |
|---|---|
| embodiment | franka (default) |
| camera group | camera_fixed |
| wrist camera | mounted on the end-effector body, hand→camera translation [0.05, 0.0, 0.0], quat [0, 0.707108, 0.707108, 0], fovy 75° |
| third-person camera | camera_to_world translation [1.0086, 0.0, 1.1904] |
| resolution | 640 × 360 |
| fps | 15 |
The wrist rig is the one that matters most. The superseded batch had it at
[-0.074, 0, 0.0292] with fovy 51.9° — 12.7 cm away, on the opposite side of the hand, and 23°
narrower. If a render comes back at the old rig it is unusable, and the difference is invisible in
a single still frame: it only shows up in how the image moves.
A quick self-check after rendering one episode: compose the inverse end-effector pose with the
recorded camera_to_world and confirm the translation is [0.05, 0, 0] to 3 decimals, and that it
is constant across frames (it should be rigid — ours measures a per-element std of ~7e-08).
2. What to render
| file | contents |
|---|---|
tasks.json |
all 10 tasks, required + spare attempt ids, the rig |
attempts/task_<id>.json |
one file per task |
attempts/all_attempts.csv |
flat table — task_id, task_name, operation, role, attempt_id, n_frames, reward_final |
| task | operation | demos | description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 809 | separate | 20 | separate the sandwich from the juice |
| 811 | reach | 20 | reach target pose |
| 866 | rotate | 20 | rotate the computer mouse |
| 868 | pick | 20 | pick single rigid object |
| 945 | put_into | 20 | put both the potato and the pepper in the bowl |
| 953 | put_spatial | 20 | put the muffin on the left side of the cup |
| 966 | put_on | 20 | put the eyeglasses case on the tissue box |
| 1426 | rearrange | 20 | rearrange three items |
| 1459 | insert | 20 | fit lid onto container |
| 1889 | put_beside | 20 | put the kiwi beside the banana |
attempt_id is the identity — please render exactly those. They are not arbitrary: they were
selected as the highest-reward demonstrations available for each task, and they are the only ones
with verified trace and goal data. Episode indices are renumbered by every build, so please key
your output on attempt_id, not on episode order.
role = spare lists 40 further attempts per task, ranked. If a required attempt fails to
render, take the highest-ranked spare and say which you substituted — don't silently drop one, as
20 demos is the whole adaptation budget and a missing demo is 5% of it.
3. Where to upload
Please upload into uploads/ in this same folder, one directory per task:
uploads/
task_809/
meta/ LeRobot v3.0 metadata
data/ parquet
videos/ observation.images.third_person/ and .wrist/
render_manifest.json attempt_id -> episode_index, per episode
task_811/
...
render_manifest.json is the important one — without an attempt_id → episode_index mapping we
have to recover the pairing by matching trajectories, which works but is slower and needs checking.
If your pipeline already emits task_manifest.json in the usual shape, that is perfect; please just
make sure records[] is populated (two tasks in the previous batch shipped with records: [] while
having over a thousand episodes).
4. Anything else
If a task can't be rendered at this rig for a structural reason, please say which and why rather than substituting a different rig — we'd rather run a 9-task benchmark than one with a mixed rig.
Questions on any of this are welcome before rendering starts; a wrong rig is expensive to discover afterwards.