daniel2588/sarcasmdata · Datasets at Hugging Face

label int64 0 1	text stringlengths 7 1.31k
1	brief ceremony marks delivery boy's passage into delivery manhood
0	Genes transfered horizontally are as subject to selection as anyother form of gene. Once intergrated into the recieving genome they are simply one more heritable element and if they alter the phenotypes (many are either neutral or even inactivatee) then of course they are subject to selection. Why do you think otherwise? Remember that horizontal transfer is a rare event roughly on a par with ordinary mutations.
1	Your denial is not serving you very well, Trebor. Also, try to learn to be something other than a dedicated kibbitzer for a change.
0	But my point is that the Supreme Court has disagreed. Hence the illegitimate legal doctrine of substantive due process, which maintains that the due process clause can be violated even in cases where due process has been given.
0	deciphering what one woman wants in a man
1	kanye west jumps on massage table to deliver speech about relaxation
0	the embarrassing skin problem nobody talks about
0	No - but then the feral child illustration was intended to highlight the significance of human social 'DNA' to humans, not to imply that it can civilize any old species. However, you raise a good point which I can turn to my advantage: let's replace the dogs in your reversed scenario with, say, chimps. Can they learn table manners and use silverware, learn to use the toilet or bathe themselves? Yes. I've seen a bonobo prepare a boil-in-the-bag meal. I consider my point concerning the role of social DNA in distinguishing human from animal pretty much made
1	'okay, gene, let's just get through this,' marketing executive beginning day tells self
1	hillary clinton issues single-word victory speech following super tuesday results
1	aarp blasted as out of touch, past its prime
0	women in business q&a: paula kavolius, founder and president, house of possibilities
1	group of '90s footnotes welcomes gingrich home
0	the sad mother's ring
0	3 attacks in 3 months put spotlight on terrorism in the u.k.
0	Well it doesn't go against the US constitution...Does it go against the California constitution? I haven't seen much credible evidence for this..then again I don't know much about the California constitution. Do you?
0	john mccain, czar hater, calls for ebola czar
0	it's complicated: 5 tips for using facebook while dating
1	family comforted by thought that man's death will prevent others from climbing war memorial to pretend to fuck horse
1	rosetta stone offers new spanish language course for pandering presidential candidates
1	reason man turning to religion later in life must be horrifying
0	So the main disagreements between fundamentalists and theistic evolutionists are what are, and are not first (primary) causes. And atheists believe everything is a second cause (or first cause) with no intelligence behind it. It still doesn't make any sense to me why theistic evolutionists are in such agreement with atheists, and so far apart from "fundamentalists".
0	social unity is most important, says pm modi on india's 70th independence day
1	True until proven otherwise eh? Xcaliber and you must get along great. You have things backward and you are probably being confused by the 'experiment to falsify a theory', that is a tenet of science based on the generalization that untrue theories are easily disproved. No logician (and by extension no good scientist) would ever hold a lack of disproof as proof. Oh right theories are never proven, so in fact your definition of theory would go something like this -> 'an idea that is not disproved which we assume is true'.
0	maintaining neutrality in the new york times, from jill abramson (video)
0	can the u.s. and india create an enduring entente?
1	Well, I guess you got something there. . . . . .can't put the cart before the hose!!
1	colgate unveils new dental grout to fill in gaps between teeth
0	double standard, double spacing
0	a new future for fashion
0	woman's face-down halloween dummy gets repeated 911 calls
1	Usually i'd agree with you but i think at 15 a person is more likely to follow a group blindly,less likely to think on his own and will find it harder to articulate there argument.VOR doesn't count,he is obviously senile.] And yes Modern Republic is correct,his posts seem oddly familar... emoticonXCool
0	the republican tax plans are all basically insane
0	Just another example of using a verse meant for personal use and applying it to wars. Sorry, just doesn't work that way.
0	chromat features not 1, but 2 plus-size models on its runway
0	woman admits stealing cop car, speeding off while handcuffed
1	willow rented
0	It has a financial impact on ALL taxpayers. To say that it has no impact on anyone else is disengenuous.
1	7.1 billion demonstrate in favor of global warming
0	machines won't replace us, they'll force us to evolve
1	punk band has something against local newscaster for some reason
0	So what we have here is a lie, based on a distortion, which is itself a fallback position from a fallback position from a fallback position from an evidence-free made-up graph about the magnetic age of the earth. And creationists say the truth is constant...
0	leaving your dream: tedx talk
0	look: what it's like to race canoes in ny's hudson river
0	americans say 2-to-1 that we never should have invaded iraq
1	single woman has facebook profile picture with sister
0	scant oversight, corporate secrecy preceded us weed killer crisis
1	secretary of the interior meekly asks if there anything she can do to help stop isis
0	democratic senators urge justice department leadership to protect robert mueller
0	the most beautiful acceptance speech this week came from a queer korean
0	infuriating video shows meek mill making homeless man do pushups for $20
1	bra training complete
0	how states can help 5 million kids with a parent behind bars
0	even as 2018 looms, most in congress nearly always vote with trump
0	number of sanctuary congregations doubles since trump's election
0	Yes, because its THEIR decision, its THEIR stomachs, and its THEIR lives. I agree that some decisions do need to be made with parental consent, but not this one. Irrelevant. How does purchasing a house have to do with abortion? Ok, so what if the kid wants to have the baby and the adults want to get rid of it? What if the adults want her to have the baby and the kid wants to get rid of it? You would force the kid to have a child (that doesn't seem responsible at all), or you would force the kid to abort her child (thereby taking away her son or daughter). Both of those decisions don't sound very consitent or responsible. The decision is best left up to the person that is pregnant, regardless of their age.
0	artists as global citizens
1	mcdonald's introduces new 6-piece chicken ncnoltes
0	'spirit' of the iran nuclear deal is a two-way street
1	So then how do you know that abortion isn't in the plan then? If as you say we have "VERY LIMITED PERSPECTIVE"
1	sweating cornnuts vp stammers way through pitch for 'nutsarito' at taco bell
1	dunkin' donuts signs 10-year partnership to be exclusive food vendor of united states
0	lucky the pig finds a happy home after falling onto highway
1	driver rules out driver error in crash
0	This is retarded. A species would be defined by the genome, not which organs work the way they are supposed to or not.
1	Yes, he threw the ID camp a bone. Tell us, Monty - what have the ID 'scientists' been doing to look for design? I mean besides reading other people's research and proclaiming "See! Design!"?
0	women in business q&a: rebecca henderson, group president, randstad professional solutions
1	I made contact with God once, but the acid wore off....
0	28 secrets of exceptionally productive people
0	Because the judges President Bush nominates are strict constructionist.They interpret the law not make it...........That is the worse nightmare for a liberal or a gay who depend on judges to over rule the vote of the people............They can't win at the ballot box so they think they can win in the courts....It won't happen.get use to it................
1	From the Catholic Educators Resource Center...Yeah...I am sure there would be no myths in there...sure you're right. emoticonXRolleyes
0	barcelona holds huge protest in support of refugees
1	dead-eyed man has been looking for non-humiliating halloween costume for past 2 hours
0	There are all kinds of social services, religious and otherwise available that will provide assistance to any woman who wants to carry her baby to term........ When pro abortion people use that as and argument it is just a red herring and smoke screen.
0	but that's not the addition of new information that's deletion of old information which supports the creationist theory that all creatures were perfect until the fall!\"" The important point is that it completely crushes one of the \strongest\" biological arguments they use against evolution.Also it is a single gene that produces 24 different isoforms in mammals but not in lower vertebrates.So it has gone from an indeterminate (based on my quick searches) number of fewer isoforms in lower vertebrates to the 24 found in mammals. That's an increase in information."
1	complex human being reduced to 'gutter guy' for purposes of to-do list
1	court summons comes with 1,025 free hours of aol
0	here's what i'm doing with my 'thoughts and prayers' this week
0	because i'm gay and in high school, legislators don't care about my health
0	You know, I cannot even remember if we covered it in middle school or high school biology. I do remember learning about Mendel and his genetics, but I swear I can't remember if we even mentioned Darwin's name. If we spent any time on it at all, it was very little. Our biology classes were mostly devoted to taxonomy, anatomy/physiology, and cellular machinery.
0	why today's parents have no business giving their kids advice
0	another entry in the files of 'jennifer lopez is better at dubsmash than you'
1	opposition to soda ban sad proof that americans still fight for what they believe in
1	biden winks after offering to buy eggnog for white house christmas party
1	'you know, i directed it too,' bradley cooper says out loud again to no one in particular
0	man jumps from hotel's 45th floor with jet pack
0	The number of deaths wouldnt be lower in any way. After all, countries like Rwanda and Sierra Leone dont have a working governmental strucure so couldnt enforce such a ban.
0	the major concern with the phone call with taiwan
0	this bracelet lets a dad feel what it's like to be pregnant ... in his wrist
0	Not heard that before! made me laugh almost as much as your lettuce eating Tyrannosaur
1	man visiting hometown amazed to find all his childhood insecurities still there
0	This assumes brain-dead is a logical choice to consider one dead. Even so, it proves nothing about when life begins. What says they have to be the same? This is a classic example of a conclusion not following from the premise.
1	Obviously 1asm escapes you....if you did not understand that remark about gun control working in Europe during the 1930's. Report me? My knees are trembling already. I believe Steeve was expressing his right to free speech.
0	colbert's mcdonald's all-day breakfast prophecies are coming true
1	hillary clinton opens chili's franchise just outside of washington, d.c.
1	Why you quoted me is questionable. What I posted was merely a series of mathematical equations proving that Hovind is completely full of ****. How you consider mathematical equations "mockery" I don't know, but more likely, you did not bother to watch the video. Instead, in your normal fashion, you simply ASSUMED what you wanted to believe and then went from there rather then actually looking at what it was and what it had to say. Your post more accurately is towards the link that AA posted in defense of his beliefs (yet failed to realize was satirizing those beliefs). Furthermore, I'm not an atheist even though your poor definition wants me to be.
1	archaeologists unearth ivory trumpet dating back to prehistoric jazz age
0	isn't she going to miss a father?
1	phone-sex ad masturbated to for 0 cents a minute
0	Right. We are explaining natural phenomena by natural means. We do so simply because we can test natural explanations while we cannot test the supernatural. We use methodological naturalism (not, by any means, philosophical naturalism) to observe, test and explain the natural. This is not a denial of god or an assumption about the existance of a god. It is a recognition of the fact that we cannot investigate the supernatural by natural means. Even methodological naturalists can be theists - Kenneth R. Miller for example.

1

brief ceremony marks delivery boy's passage into delivery manhood

0

Genes transfered horizontally are as subject to selection as anyother form of gene. Once intergrated into the recieving genome they are simply one more heritable element and if they alter the phenotypes (many are either neutral or even inactivatee) then of course they are subject to selection. Why do you think otherwise? Remember that horizontal transfer is a rare event roughly on a par with ordinary mutations.

1

Your denial is not serving you very well, Trebor. Also, try to learn to be something other than a dedicated kibbitzer for a change.

0

But my point is that the Supreme Court has disagreed. Hence the illegitimate legal doctrine of substantive due process, which maintains that the due process clause can be violated even in cases where due process has been given.

0

deciphering what one woman wants in a man

1

kanye west jumps on massage table to deliver speech about relaxation

0

the embarrassing skin problem nobody talks about

0

No - but then the feral child illustration was intended to highlight the significance of human social 'DNA' to humans, not to imply that it can civilize any old species. However, you raise a good point which I can turn to my advantage: let's replace the dogs in your reversed scenario with, say, chimps. Can they learn table manners and use silverware, learn to use the toilet or bathe themselves? Yes. I've seen a bonobo prepare a boil-in-the-bag meal. I consider my point concerning the role of social DNA in distinguishing human from animal pretty much made

1

'okay, gene, let's just get through this,' marketing executive beginning day tells self

1

hillary clinton issues single-word victory speech following super tuesday results

1

aarp blasted as out of touch, past its prime

0

women in business q&a: paula kavolius, founder and president, house of possibilities

1

group of '90s footnotes welcomes gingrich home

0

the sad mother's ring

0

3 attacks in 3 months put spotlight on terrorism in the u.k.

0

Well it doesn't go against the US constitution...Does it go against the California constitution? I haven't seen much credible evidence for this..then again I don't know much about the California constitution. Do you?

0

john mccain, czar hater, calls for ebola czar

0

it's complicated: 5 tips for using facebook while dating

1

family comforted by thought that man's death will prevent others from climbing war memorial to pretend to fuck horse

1

rosetta stone offers new spanish language course for pandering presidential candidates

1

reason man turning to religion later in life must be horrifying

0

So the main disagreements between fundamentalists and theistic evolutionists are what are, and are not first (primary) causes. And atheists believe everything is a second cause (or first cause) with no intelligence behind it. It still doesn't make any sense to me why theistic evolutionists are in such agreement with atheists, and so far apart from "fundamentalists".

0

social unity is most important, says pm modi on india's 70th independence day

1

True until proven otherwise eh? Xcaliber and you must get along great. You have things backward and you are probably being confused by the 'experiment to falsify a theory', that is a tenet of science based on the generalization that untrue theories are easily disproved. No logician (and by extension no good scientist) would ever hold a lack of disproof as proof. Oh right theories are never proven, so in fact your definition of theory would go something like this -> 'an idea that is not disproved which we assume is true'.

0

maintaining neutrality in the new york times, from jill abramson (video)

0

can the u.s. and india create an enduring entente?

1

Well, I guess you got something there. . . . . .can't put the cart before the hose!!

1

colgate unveils new dental grout to fill in gaps between teeth

0

double standard, double spacing

0

a new future for fashion

0

woman's face-down halloween dummy gets repeated 911 calls

1

Usually i'd agree with you but i think at 15 a person is more likely to follow a group blindly,less likely to think on his own and will find it harder to articulate there argument.VOR doesn't count,he is obviously senile.] And yes Modern Republic is correct,his posts seem oddly familar... emoticonXCool

0

the republican tax plans are all basically insane

0

Just another example of using a verse meant for personal use and applying it to wars. Sorry, just doesn't work that way.

0

chromat features not 1, but 2 plus-size models on its runway

0

woman admits stealing cop car, speeding off while handcuffed

1

willow rented

0

It has a financial impact on ALL taxpayers. To say that it has no impact on anyone else is disengenuous.

1

7.1 billion demonstrate in favor of global warming

0

machines won't replace us, they'll force us to evolve

1

punk band has something against local newscaster for some reason

0

So what we have here is a lie, based on a distortion, which is itself a fallback position from a fallback position from a fallback position from an evidence-free made-up graph about the magnetic age of the earth. And creationists say the truth is constant...

0

leaving your dream: tedx talk

0

look: what it's like to race canoes in ny's hudson river

0

americans say 2-to-1 that we never should have invaded iraq

1

single woman has facebook profile picture with sister

0

scant oversight, corporate secrecy preceded us weed killer crisis

1

secretary of the interior meekly asks if there anything she can do to help stop isis

0

democratic senators urge justice department leadership to protect robert mueller

0

the most beautiful acceptance speech this week came from a queer korean

0

infuriating video shows meek mill making homeless man do pushups for $20

1

bra training complete

0

how states can help 5 million kids with a parent behind bars

0

even as 2018 looms, most in congress nearly always vote with trump

0

number of sanctuary congregations doubles since trump's election

0

Yes, because its THEIR decision, its THEIR stomachs, and its THEIR lives. I agree that some decisions do need to be made with parental consent, but not this one. Irrelevant. How does purchasing a house have to do with abortion? Ok, so what if the kid wants to have the baby and the adults want to get rid of it? What if the adults want her to have the baby and the kid wants to get rid of it? You would force the kid to have a child (that doesn't seem responsible at all), or you would force the kid to abort her child (thereby taking away her son or daughter). Both of those decisions don't sound very consitent or responsible. The decision is best left up to the person that is pregnant, regardless of their age.

0

artists as global citizens

1

mcdonald's introduces new 6-piece chicken ncnoltes

0

'spirit' of the iran nuclear deal is a two-way street

1

So then how do you know that abortion isn't in the plan then? If as you say we have "VERY LIMITED PERSPECTIVE"

1

sweating cornnuts vp stammers way through pitch for 'nutsarito' at taco bell

1

dunkin' donuts signs 10-year partnership to be exclusive food vendor of united states

0

lucky the pig finds a happy home after falling onto highway

1

driver rules out driver error in crash

0

This is retarded. A species would be defined by the genome, not which organs work the way they are supposed to or not.

1

Yes, he threw the ID camp a bone. Tell us, Monty - what have the ID 'scientists' been doing to look for design? I mean besides reading other people's research and proclaiming "See! Design!"?

0

women in business q&a: rebecca henderson, group president, randstad professional solutions

1

I made contact with God once, but the acid wore off....

0

28 secrets of exceptionally productive people

0

Because the judges President Bush nominates are strict constructionist.They interpret the law not make it...........That is the worse nightmare for a liberal or a gay who depend on judges to over rule the vote of the people............They can't win at the ballot box so they think they can win in the courts....It won't happen.get use to it................

1

From the Catholic Educators Resource Center...Yeah...I am sure there would be no myths in there...sure you're right. emoticonXRolleyes

0

barcelona holds huge protest in support of refugees

1

dead-eyed man has been looking for non-humiliating halloween costume for past 2 hours

0

There are all kinds of social services, religious and otherwise available that will provide assistance to any woman who wants to carry her baby to term........ When pro abortion people use that as and argument it is just a red herring and smoke screen.

0

but that's not the addition of new information that's deletion of old information which supports the creationist theory that all creatures were perfect until the fall!\"" The important point is that it completely crushes one of the \strongest\" biological arguments they use against evolution.Also it is a single gene that produces 24 different isoforms in mammals but not in lower vertebrates.So it has gone from an indeterminate (based on my quick searches) number of fewer isoforms in lower vertebrates to the 24 found in mammals. That's an increase in information."

1

complex human being reduced to 'gutter guy' for purposes of to-do list

1

court summons comes with 1,025 free hours of aol

0

here's what i'm doing with my 'thoughts and prayers' this week

0

because i'm gay and in high school, legislators don't care about my health

0

You know, I cannot even remember if we covered it in middle school or high school biology. I do remember learning about Mendel and his genetics, but I swear I can't remember if we even mentioned Darwin's name. If we spent any time on it at all, it was very little. Our biology classes were mostly devoted to taxonomy, anatomy/physiology, and cellular machinery.

0

why today's parents have no business giving their kids advice

0

another entry in the files of 'jennifer lopez is better at dubsmash than you'

1

opposition to soda ban sad proof that americans still fight for what they believe in

1

biden winks after offering to buy eggnog for white house christmas party

1

'you know, i directed it too,' bradley cooper says out loud again to no one in particular

0

man jumps from hotel's 45th floor with jet pack

0

The number of deaths wouldnt be lower in any way. After all, countries like Rwanda and Sierra Leone dont have a working governmental strucure so couldnt enforce such a ban.

0

the major concern with the phone call with taiwan

0

this bracelet lets a dad feel what it's like to be pregnant ... in his wrist

0

Not heard that before! made me laugh almost as much as your lettuce eating Tyrannosaur

1

man visiting hometown amazed to find all his childhood insecurities still there

0

This assumes brain-dead is a logical choice to consider one dead. Even so, it proves nothing about when life begins. What says they have to be the same? This is a classic example of a conclusion not following from the premise.

1

Obviously 1asm escapes you....if you did not understand that remark about gun control working in Europe during the 1930's. Report me? My knees are trembling already. I believe Steeve was expressing his right to free speech.

0

colbert's mcdonald's all-day breakfast prophecies are coming true

1

hillary clinton opens chili's franchise just outside of washington, d.c.

1

Why you quoted me is questionable. What I posted was merely a series of mathematical equations proving that Hovind is completely full of ****. How you consider mathematical equations "mockery" I don't know, but more likely, you did not bother to watch the video. Instead, in your normal fashion, you simply ASSUMED what you wanted to believe and then went from there rather then actually looking at what it was and what it had to say. Your post more accurately is towards the link that AA posted in defense of his beliefs (yet failed to realize was satirizing those beliefs). Furthermore, I'm not an atheist even though your poor definition wants me to be.

1

archaeologists unearth ivory trumpet dating back to prehistoric jazz age

0

isn't she going to miss a father?

1

phone-sex ad masturbated to for 0 cents a minute

0

Right. We are explaining natural phenomena by natural means. We do so simply because we can test natural explanations while we cannot test the supernatural. We use methodological naturalism (not, by any means, philosophical naturalism) to observe, test and explain the natural. This is not a denial of god or an assumption about the existance of a god. It is a recognition of the fact that we cannot investigate the supernatural by natural means. Even methodological naturalists can be theists - Kenneth R. Miller for example.