daniel2588/sarcasmdata · Datasets at Hugging Face

label int64 0 1	text stringlengths 7 1.31k
0	Well, all I can say then is that no action is just about as bad as failed action, and IS as bad in terms of anything current. Either way you don't have gay marriage. You have a majority in Congress right now, and you're not demanding much change just because of fear of backlash? Yeah, there would be backlash. Heck, the Civil War was the ultimate backlash, but that didn't stop abolitionists from demanding more than TOKEN change, and it's a good thing they did. It's your gig, though, so do what you want. I don't see much point in laboring this discussion any more; I'm just pointing out my observations.
1	joy sucked out of room by pumped-up manager
0	a cornell frat held a disgusting 'pig roast' sex contest and i'm not surprised
0	If I call somebody "male", that restricts no rights from them.It doesn't require they go to a separate place to get their rights.And quite frankly, insisting on keeping one definition FOR A RIGHT (at the exclusion of gays) is "satisfying the ego" of the homophobic group.
0	mayor apologizes for citing wwii japanese internment camps in rejecting refugees
1	craig kilborn weds self in private ceremony
0	why this fierce model is ok with being called fat
0	wonder woman save us all
1	dog doesn't consider itself part of family
0	democratic national committee asks its entire staff to resign
0	No it doesn't. First, the changes may not be neutral. I will presume that you are intelligent enough to grasp that idea the mutations in and of themselves are neither advantagous nor disadvantageous, and the they have no purpose. Evolution happens when the mutations (and other mechanisms that increase genetic diversity) are acted upon by other mechanisms of evolution. Even in natural selection there is no purpose. Natural selection is differential reproductive success. Some organisms tend to produce more offspring because they have characteristics that give them an advantage in a particular environment.
1	YOu mean they don't eat, sleep , pass wastes, fight (not neccesarily physically) for dominance in their social setting, react to the opposite sex, put on displays for the opposite sex, and things like that? How very odd.
0	ivanka trump's nordstrom sales reportedly dropped over 70 percent right before the election
0	a talk with fabio viviani
1	chimp actor looking to direct
0	u.s. figure skater nathan chen redeems himself with record-setting skate
1	report: it a miracle nothing has punctured your eye yet
1	authorities warn denver residents in direct path of 2037 hurricane alba
1	food network production assistants prep guy fieri with dry rub
1	christ sues catholic church for unlicensed use of his image
1	'bad to the bone' to be used in film
0	what it's really like to be 16 with cancer
0	Well excuuuuse me if I screwed that up in this post. Have a nice day. :)
0	'queer eye' star bobby berk gave me a desk makeover -- and it was incredible
0	cnn's van jones wants trump supporters to face the fear of his presidency
1	poll finds 2018 midterms resting on critical swing group of people who showed up looking for community center pottery class
0	when autocorrect and sexting collide
0	No, not really. All that is different is the number of steps. What is YOUR definition of 'macro-evoution'? Is it speciation? Or is it a brand new genus? We have observed speciation, where new species happened.
1	victoria's secret also andrew's secret
0	because all children should have parents who want them dearly.btw, "moral relativism" is absurd. a phase people pass through as they discover diversity and is bewildered by it, thinking all are equally valid. it is a stance of both immature/superficial reasoning and moral depravity.
1	monster truck escapes
1	nyc health department cracks down on food vendors who fail to wipe off meat with rag
0	class of 2014: tips for renting your first post-grad apartment
0	my mother hated tattoos, so naturally i got one for her
1	elite congressman trained to kill legislation in 24 different ways
0	conceiving our chosen family
1	van's rocking motion discourages would-be knocker
1	If I ever need a kidney to live, I know who to tell them to harvest from... whether or not you agree to it :P
0	david brooks: obama has a 'manhood problem in the middle east'
1	experts refuse to warn of any new health hazards until americans deal with current backlog
0	30 unbeleafably adorable gifts for plant lovers
0	You couldnt be more wrong. Our goverment was built on the word of God. Its ALL OVER our founding documents. George Washington was quoted to say "You cannot call yourself an American and subvert the word of God." Your only argument can go back to the sep.of church and state. Which is new compaired to when our laws were drafted. So not always... just unfortuanatly now. Which is a BIG mistake by the way and could be the downfall of our country. Try again...
1	study: 38 age it too late
0	nick jonas shows off his best 'blue steel' on cover of adon magazine
1	john kelly resigns in last-ditch effort to save his and trump's friendship
0	George Tiller shot to death at Wichita church \| News Updates \| Wichita Eagle
0	if you want to understand the price of milk, think of it like gasoline
0	jared leto may play the joker in 'suicide squad'
0	dale earnhardt jr. is a pro at giving breakup advice too
1	sick fucks line up to gape at dead body
0	i don't belong in tech
0	what do you know about the colors of nature?
1	Yeah, and we all know what happened when they did that with Galileo. emoticonXRolleyes
0	peter facinelli & jaimie alexander are engaged
1	authorities say blacklight analysis shows velvet poster of mushroom kingdom looking even cooler than previously imagined
1	'paw patrol' writers defend episode where german shepherd cop shoots unarmed black lab 17 times in back
1	proposed legislation would require airline seats meet federal ass standards
1	jennifer aniston finally reveals hairstyle that repulsed brad pitt
0	Again with the common sense, but that is another issue alltogether. You're arguement that the brain is a fundamental unit of life is just plain wrong, considering the majority of all organisms don't have one. Bacteria, Protists, Plants, Fungi, and some animals are all without brains. Brains are required for motion and fast response to immediate changes in environment, for example a falling rock. Brains cluster nerves so that appropriate action can be taken. Some brains are amazingly simple while others like our own are immensly complex. Your arguements all show a general lack of study in biology and my common sense is appalled by yours. I am reminded of Bill Maher who once said about the intelligent design debate: "Because you don't have to teach both sides of an arguement when one side is retarded."
0	microsoft debuts surface book, its first laptop, plus other new gizmos
0	what's the deal with the lack of lgbt stock photography?
1	moviepass attempts to increase profitability by no longer mailing out free $500 a month to subscribers
0	while trump attacks colin kaepernick, the quarterback is donating to meals on wheels
1	terrified glob of cream cheese escapes bagel
1	poll finds americans still fiercely divided along charlotte brontë–emily brontë lines
1	study finds 80 percent of facial hair being silently judged at any one time
0	What you are talking about here is the potential to exist being important. I would personally also thinking that potential existence is important, but not nearly as important as an existing person. After all, unfertilized eggs and sperm also have the potential to become full people but no one is concerned about their loss. For many of us it is the actual mentally-existing person that is most important. For both the 'braniac" case you present and for the early term fetus, if there is no reason to kill it, then don't. However, if there is a contest between the rights of a living, existing person and the rights of either potential person, then I think the rights of the living person win out.
1	alumni magazine tiptoeing around campus shooting
0	how racism reared its ugly head after #missuniverse2015
0	springing into may/charitable & cultural catch-up
0	justice dept. sues illinois city for blocking an islamic center
1	serious mitt romney demanding to be addressed as 'mitthew' now
0	Usually, but most of this has been quoted out of context by creationists and answered so often that it is an old story. Besides, as I mentioned, Feduccia has just published a detailed study on the embryology of bird digits. It supports his view, of course. I don't have a problem with that and it is certainly an issue worth study. My days of ornithology and embryology were long ago.Also, since those papers were published there have been several more feathered dinosaurs and primative birds discovered. Things are moving fast right now. Jeff Polling also has some information about the Ruben et al. article.But the "bird hip/lizard hip" bit is pure nonsense that demonstrates profound ignorance or intentional deceit. The correct information is so easy to find. That sort of conduct certainly casts a bad light on creationism.
1	Gee, you're such an example to Americans, CU. Perhaps you, instead of Wendell Potter, should testify to Congress. If you're not laid up in a gutter, God forbid, with a brain tumor. emoticonXRolleyes
0	2 men indicted in bacon vandalism at islamic center
0	donald trump won't stop attacking paul ryan
1	guy at bank has weird hair for guy who works at bank
1	woman's greatest dream to one day dance in studio audience of 'the ellen degeneres show'
0	the powerful reason this woman forgave her sexual abuser
0	controversial congressman touts iowa 'peasant hunt' with donald trump jr.
1	gun goes off during life's third act
1	thrill-seeker microwaves pot pie without slitting crust
1	hopeless resignation receives massive post-debate bump
1	graffiti artist no longer putting his heart in it
1	extravagant new window blinds inspired by the latest styles from venice
1	world's last bob hope fan dies of old age
1	Better third grade than kindergarten, Steve. Grow up. Your constitutional knowledge isn't exactly impressive.
1	hog executed farmland style
0	adele's new bodyguard is sending the internet into meltdown
0	adorable bear cubs hitch a ride on mom's back across an alaska lake
0	businesses say anti-lgbt bills could cost texas billions
0	15 popular travel destinations you should avoid in the summer
0	powerful post reminds parents to enjoy the noise while they can
0	'we do!' -- episcopalians ok marriage for same-sex couples
1	cost of paper
0	the quadruple bottom line: its time has come
1	I'm sure it is many a doctors' spiritual duty to relieve suffering, just as Jesus healed the sick. Besides, who wants to go back to 40 year average lifespan, like they have in Afghanistan? Not me.
0	cinema therapy and robin williams
0	There is just one thing however. The coelacanths found are different from those in the fossil record. Further, ALL evidence pointed to them being extinct, until we found other evidence, and we changed it. And, to top it off, the article says NEARLY extinct, not COMPLETELY. Although, this article was of course written after the coelocanths were re-discovered. Of course, this has absolutely nothing to do with the theory of evolution, which explains the mechanisms responsible for the change of allele frequencies in populations over time.
0	on being cold, tired, and hungry... and a jerk!

0

Well, all I can say then is that no action is just about as bad as failed action, and IS as bad in terms of anything current. Either way you don't have gay marriage. You have a majority in Congress right now, and you're not demanding much change just because of fear of backlash? Yeah, there would be backlash. Heck, the Civil War was the ultimate backlash, but that didn't stop abolitionists from demanding more than TOKEN change, and it's a good thing they did. It's your gig, though, so do what you want. I don't see much point in laboring this discussion any more; I'm just pointing out my observations.

1

joy sucked out of room by pumped-up manager

0

a cornell frat held a disgusting 'pig roast' sex contest and i'm not surprised

0

If I call somebody "male", that restricts no rights from them.It doesn't require they go to a separate place to get their rights.And quite frankly, insisting on keeping one definition FOR A RIGHT (at the exclusion of gays) is "satisfying the ego" of the homophobic group.

0

mayor apologizes for citing wwii japanese internment camps in rejecting refugees

1

craig kilborn weds self in private ceremony

0

why this fierce model is ok with being called fat

0

wonder woman save us all

1

dog doesn't consider itself part of family

0

democratic national committee asks its entire staff to resign

0

No it doesn't. First, the changes may not be neutral. I will presume that you are intelligent enough to grasp that idea the mutations in and of themselves are neither advantagous nor disadvantageous, and the they have no purpose. Evolution happens when the mutations (and other mechanisms that increase genetic diversity) are acted upon by other mechanisms of evolution. Even in natural selection there is no purpose. Natural selection is differential reproductive success. Some organisms tend to produce more offspring because they have characteristics that give them an advantage in a particular environment.

1

YOu mean they don't eat, sleep , pass wastes, fight (not neccesarily physically) for dominance in their social setting, react to the opposite sex, put on displays for the opposite sex, and things like that? How very odd.

0

ivanka trump's nordstrom sales reportedly dropped over 70 percent right before the election

0

a talk with fabio viviani

1

chimp actor looking to direct

0

u.s. figure skater nathan chen redeems himself with record-setting skate

1

report: it a miracle nothing has punctured your eye yet

1

authorities warn denver residents in direct path of 2037 hurricane alba

1

food network production assistants prep guy fieri with dry rub

1

christ sues catholic church for unlicensed use of his image

1

'bad to the bone' to be used in film

0

what it's really like to be 16 with cancer

0

Well excuuuuse me if I screwed that up in this post. Have a nice day. :)

0

'queer eye' star bobby berk gave me a desk makeover -- and it was incredible

0

cnn's van jones wants trump supporters to face the fear of his presidency

1

poll finds 2018 midterms resting on critical swing group of people who showed up looking for community center pottery class

0

when autocorrect and sexting collide

0

No, not really. All that is different is the number of steps. What is YOUR definition of 'macro-evoution'? Is it speciation? Or is it a brand new genus? We have observed speciation, where new species happened.

1

victoria's secret also andrew's secret

0

because all children should have parents who want them dearly.btw, "moral relativism" is absurd. a phase people pass through as they discover diversity and is bewildered by it, thinking all are equally valid. it is a stance of both immature/superficial reasoning and moral depravity.

1

monster truck escapes

1

nyc health department cracks down on food vendors who fail to wipe off meat with rag

0

class of 2014: tips for renting your first post-grad apartment

0

my mother hated tattoos, so naturally i got one for her

1

elite congressman trained to kill legislation in 24 different ways

0

conceiving our chosen family

1

van's rocking motion discourages would-be knocker

1

If I ever need a kidney to live, I know who to tell them to harvest from... whether or not you agree to it :P

0

david brooks: obama has a 'manhood problem in the middle east'

1

experts refuse to warn of any new health hazards until americans deal with current backlog

0

30 unbeleafably adorable gifts for plant lovers

0

You couldnt be more wrong. Our goverment was built on the word of God. Its ALL OVER our founding documents. George Washington was quoted to say "You cannot call yourself an American and subvert the word of God." Your only argument can go back to the sep.of church and state. Which is new compaired to when our laws were drafted. So not always... just unfortuanatly now. Which is a BIG mistake by the way and could be the downfall of our country. Try again...

1

study: 38 age it too late

0

nick jonas shows off his best 'blue steel' on cover of adon magazine

1

john kelly resigns in last-ditch effort to save his and trump's friendship

0

George Tiller shot to death at Wichita church | News Updates | Wichita Eagle

0

if you want to understand the price of milk, think of it like gasoline

0

jared leto may play the joker in 'suicide squad'

0

dale earnhardt jr. is a pro at giving breakup advice too

1

sick fucks line up to gape at dead body

0

i don't belong in tech

0

what do you know about the colors of nature?

1

Yeah, and we all know what happened when they did that with Galileo. emoticonXRolleyes

0

peter facinelli & jaimie alexander are engaged

1

authorities say blacklight analysis shows velvet poster of mushroom kingdom looking even cooler than previously imagined

1

'paw patrol' writers defend episode where german shepherd cop shoots unarmed black lab 17 times in back

1

proposed legislation would require airline seats meet federal ass standards

1

jennifer aniston finally reveals hairstyle that repulsed brad pitt

0

Again with the common sense, but that is another issue alltogether. You're arguement that the brain is a fundamental unit of life is just plain wrong, considering the majority of all organisms don't have one. Bacteria, Protists, Plants, Fungi, and some animals are all without brains. Brains are required for motion and fast response to immediate changes in environment, for example a falling rock. Brains cluster nerves so that appropriate action can be taken. Some brains are amazingly simple while others like our own are immensly complex. Your arguements all show a general lack of study in biology and my common sense is appalled by yours. I am reminded of Bill Maher who once said about the intelligent design debate: "Because you don't have to teach both sides of an arguement when one side is retarded."

0

microsoft debuts surface book, its first laptop, plus other new gizmos

0

what's the deal with the lack of lgbt stock photography?

1

moviepass attempts to increase profitability by no longer mailing out free $500 a month to subscribers

0

while trump attacks colin kaepernick, the quarterback is donating to meals on wheels

1

terrified glob of cream cheese escapes bagel

1

poll finds americans still fiercely divided along charlotte brontë–emily brontë lines

1

study finds 80 percent of facial hair being silently judged at any one time

0

What you are talking about here is the *potential* to exist being important. I would personally also thinking that potential existence is important, but not nearly as important as an existing person. After all, unfertilized eggs and sperm also have the *potential* to become full people but no one is concerned about their loss. For many of us it is the actual mentally-existing person that is most important. For both the 'braniac" case you present and for the early term fetus, if there is no reason to kill it, then don't. However, if there is a contest between the rights of a living, existing person and the rights of either *potential* person, then I think the rights of the living person win out.

1

alumni magazine tiptoeing around campus shooting

0

how racism reared its ugly head after #missuniverse2015

0

springing into may/charitable & cultural catch-up

0

justice dept. sues illinois city for blocking an islamic center

1

serious mitt romney demanding to be addressed as 'mitthew' now

0

Usually, but most of this has been quoted out of context by creationists and answered so often that it is an old story. Besides, as I mentioned, Feduccia has just published a detailed study on the embryology of bird digits. It supports his view, of course. I don't have a problem with that and it is certainly an issue worth study. My days of ornithology and embryology were long ago.Also, since those papers were published there have been several more feathered dinosaurs and primative birds discovered. Things are moving fast right now. Jeff Polling also has some information about the Ruben et al. article.But the "bird hip/lizard hip" bit is pure nonsense that demonstrates profound ignorance or intentional deceit. The correct information is so easy to find. That sort of conduct certainly casts a bad light on creationism.

1

Gee, you're such an example to Americans, CU. Perhaps you, instead of Wendell Potter, should testify to Congress. If you're not laid up in a gutter, God forbid, with a brain tumor. emoticonXRolleyes

0

2 men indicted in bacon vandalism at islamic center

0

donald trump won't stop attacking paul ryan

1

guy at bank has weird hair for guy who works at bank

1

woman's greatest dream to one day dance in studio audience of 'the ellen degeneres show'

0

the powerful reason this woman forgave her sexual abuser

0

controversial congressman touts iowa 'peasant hunt' with donald trump jr.

1

gun goes off during life's third act

1

thrill-seeker microwaves pot pie without slitting crust

1

hopeless resignation receives massive post-debate bump

1

graffiti artist no longer putting his heart in it

1

extravagant new window blinds inspired by the latest styles from venice

1

world's last bob hope fan dies of old age

1

Better third grade than kindergarten, Steve. Grow up. Your constitutional knowledge isn't exactly impressive.

1

hog executed farmland style

0

adele's new bodyguard is sending the internet into meltdown

0

adorable bear cubs hitch a ride on mom's back across an alaska lake

0

businesses say anti-lgbt bills could cost texas billions

0

15 popular travel destinations you should avoid in the summer

0

powerful post reminds parents to enjoy the noise while they can

0

'we do!' -- episcopalians ok marriage for same-sex couples

1

cost of paper

0

the quadruple bottom line: its time has come

1

I'm sure it is many a doctors' spiritual duty to relieve suffering, just as Jesus healed the sick. Besides, who wants to go back to 40 year average lifespan, like they have in Afghanistan? Not me.

0

cinema therapy and robin williams

0

There is just one thing however. The coelacanths found are different from those in the fossil record. Further, ALL evidence pointed to them being extinct, until we found other evidence, and we changed it. And, to top it off, the article says NEARLY extinct, not COMPLETELY. Although, this article was of course written after the coelocanths were re-discovered. Of course, this has absolutely nothing to do with the theory of evolution, which explains the mechanisms responsible for the change of allele frequencies in populations over time.

0

on being cold, tired, and hungry... and a jerk!