daniel2588/sarcasmdata · Datasets at Hugging Face

label int64 0 1	text stringlengths 7 1.31k
0	kris jenner has her say on son-in-law kanye west's 'good intentions'
1	I will give you definite proof that I am the king of Spain when you prove your false claims. You made your assertions first so you prove them first. I know no one who has mentioned living with a gay, delusional, racist...one more lie from you.
1	My IQ is more than two digits, is that what you mean?
0	bruno mars reportedly offered halftime spot for super bowl 50
0	jimmy fallon's #myroommateisweird tweets sum up all your roomie nightmares
1	damning evidence shows actor al jolson wearing blackface
0	So why are you so afraid of it? If it is bad you will have a choice to go to a private insurance company.
0	actress misty upham reported missing in washington state
0	airasia passengers share stories of near-misses that kept them off vanished plane
0	retired police chief says he was unlawfully detained at jfk airport
1	naked man mingles freely in locker room
1	comics not just for kids anymore, reports 85,000th mainstream news story
0	this road sign is a lot less helpful than it looks
1	obama begins inauguration festivities with ceremonial drone flyover
0	anheuser-busch delivers a bunch of beer in a self-driving truck
0	Can we get away from quoting 5 year old posts? Seriously, if you don't take the time to actually read the thread why should I respond to your post?
0	what makes for a stable marriage?
1	men and women of armed forces thank local woman for song dedication
1	pornhub expands parental controls for user accounts
1	Your love of assumption is quite amusing (it also highlights your inability to argue honestly). All I did was point out that accidents are a cause of injuries and fatalities dealing with firearms. Nowhere did I suggest banning them in the slightest. Furthermore, I specifically noted that most of the accidents were due to improper gun safety. So how about you take the stick out of your XXX and stop assuming whatever the **** you want for a change? You are a joke Isly. About time you admit it.
0	chrissy teigen poses in her bra with teddy bear post-met gala
0	william baldwin 'wouldn't vote' for trump, but knows why so many others might
1	swing states roughed up by bush, kerry operatives
1	world bank forecloses on world farm
0	atheists join hindus, vegans, satanists in asking for state capitol monument
0	snooping on your smartphone: how to avoid apps spying on you
1	You know what I meant... it was an expression. But I really don't need to know if your mouth was open or not, way too much information.
1	I think we should put to a vote, the right of the religious extremists, to vote at all. What say ye? If the majority agrees, they have no say in anything anymore. Isn't that the way Steeeeeve says it should be done? Put it to a vote?
0	Yes. It describes an action without ascribing its form to its end result, outcome, whatever but strictly to a cause/s force/s in action. That is why 'selection' is always teleological. In order to select or choose anything, an end must always be in view. There must always be a volitional discrimination of options based upon a criterion dictated by the desired end. The only time "channel" becomes teleological is when something live [a human or a beaver, let's say] intententionally does the channeling. But since it is understood that mechanical forces can also 'channel', unintentional, out of simple mechanics, the word channel cannot be called teleological. In the same way, 'sorting' can be considered non-teleological, hence mechanical, and thus suited to your glossary, because things can be sorted by mechanical forces alone. But 'selection' always requires volition and awareness. So 'selection' is always teleological.
0	live from the toronto film festival: sunday, sept. 7
1	report: fbi learns of plot to download old school
1	u.s.–cuba relations end after obama hit by foul ball at exhibition baseball game
1	cricket located
1	vending machine most up-to-date technology in school
0	ice-t and coco talk sex during pregnancy
1	congress splits into male and female senators to discuss newest reproductive bill
1	chicago police department to monitor all interactions with public using new bullet cams
0	climate change is ruining farmers' lives, but only a few will admit it
1	upcoming election deduced from sports illustrated content
1	gina haspel nervously rubs lucky prisoner's foot during cia director confirmation hearing
0	If a child comes in for an abortion and fears abuse from her parents then law enforcement should be notified. The only people protected by opposing notification laws are abusers and pedophiles. No elective, invasive medical proceedure should be performed on a child without the consent of a parent or judge. If a minor is allowed to have an abortion without consent the parents/ guardians will have no idea whats been done to this child should complications arise, they wouldn't be able to give this information to a ER doctor or the childs pediatrition.
0	how i became that middle-aged woman who uses baby talk with her dogs
0	last-minute super bowl party décor
0	democrats agree to reopen government without protections for dreamers
1	partygoer vows to fix keg
0	dnc chair debbie wasserman schultz is taking a ton of heat for helping payday lenders
1	study: 73% of bedroom closets have wife's boy toy crouched naked inside
1	status of gathering upgraded to 'party' by presence of pizza
0	Nonsense. The most widely accepted idea is that these epics were oral traditions that were finally recorded in writing, possibly by a guy named Homer. Read and read.
1	carhartt introduces rugged work thong
0	the amazing things that happened when i started yoga at 85
1	taylor swift mourns death of boyfriend christopher dorner
0	sanders could pull off michigan-style upset in ohio
0	more than 50 tech companies take on trump's new travel ban
0	Last time I checked, it was a debate about religion and evolution co-existing. Not a debate about Creationism vs. "science" and "reality".
1	man runs out of questions to ask 4-year-old
0	kendall and kylie jenner get revenge on cheating guy in snapchat soap opera
1	text message a bit curt
1	dog blocks off afternoon to lick spot on floor where owner once dropped pepperoni
1	scientists warn ionosphere one top-40 hit away from exploding
1	tree outside window upset man just changed channel
0	it only took 7 seconds for this kylie jenner appearance to get really awkward
0	The attacker is usually armed in spite of gun control laws. All they do is disarm the law abiding. Not to mention the lack of enforcement on criminals.
0	jon huntsman accepts post as ambassador to russia
0	people sick of 'thoughts and prayers' demand action after florida school shooting
0	pissed off from a lack of sleep? you might be 'slangry'
1	Oh, I LOVE semantics games Well, viability now is around 23-25 weeks gestation and really is based on weight more than age. Howeverm the past push towards heroic intervention is now tempered by the rather horrific disabilities and complications seen at the younger age
1	koch brothers furious kavanaugh never disclosed that nation might care about sexual abuse
0	anti-abortion women's marchers head back to washington
0	spirits in the night
1	'i'd like the crispy chicken sandwich' first truthful thing man has said in weeks
0	the global search for education: latin america is online
1	gym adds big heavy pull thing in corner
1	the media: are they media-obsessed?
1	fema recommends americans always have go-bag packed in case past finally catches up with them
1	report: u.s. economy loses $20 billion annually to americans writing ideas down illegibly
0	So what? Why should the woman be forced to care for this child against her will?
0	someone replaced train sounds with screams, and it's genius
0	all of taylor swift's bffs on the 1989 tour
1	community mural depicts misshapen globs of all races
0	the ingredient that's worse than sugar -- and 2 others to watch for
1	supreme court debuts new spaghetti strap sun-robes for spring
1	school psychologist crushing it in wake of fatal sports injury
1	95 killed in rush for free flames in nigerian tanker fire
1	WOW are we seeing the softer, gentiler Jyoshu? Your snoopy avatar must be afecting you :) :p
0	5 brilliant italian dishes you haven't tried before
0	But it does restrict criminal access to such items. And it has nothing to do with Tyranny. If a government feels that a certain measure will protect its people and society at the cost of restricting an item that is dangerous I can understand it. It is not tyranny, it is a government doing what it is supposed to. Again I personally disagree with the decision, but I do not believe it is anybodys 'right' to own a weapon nor do I equate such restrictions with extreme forms of government.
0	There's no adding of firearms going on, because they're already there! The criminals have them, that's a hard fact of life that can't ever be changed. Deal with it. What we want is for the intended victims to be on equal footing with the bad guys. There's nothing unreasonable about that.
1	highway billboard urges 75-mile detour
1	orca mother carries around dead calf for two weeks as warning to all who would defy her
1	Yes, some people are jumping ship, which is a crying shame. STICK TO YOUR GUNS MEN! WE'RE WINNING!
0	nfl players and team owners can see 'concussion' for free
0	michelle obama explains in no uncertain terms why she won't run for office
1	You can take anything you want, but you won't take that one very far, especially because you cannot find a single post of mine advocating equality of outcome. Harrison Bergeron must be unknown to you - unless your last name is Glampers.emoticonXAngel
1	employee's multitasking doesn't include work
0	gucci mane sentenced!
0	challenging the warsaw pact from within
1	You want a society that oppresses people. If the law effects even one person adversly then it is unjust and needs to be overturned. IT only goes to prove that conservatives are heartless and want people to suffer.
0	roy moore says religious liberty 'comes from god,' not the constitution
1	aretha franklin institute for female entrepreneurship confirms sisters are doin' it for themselves

0

kris jenner has her say on son-in-law kanye west's 'good intentions'

1

I will give you definite proof that I am the king of Spain when you prove your false claims. You made your assertions first so you prove them first. I know no one who has mentioned living with a gay, delusional, racist...one more lie from you.

1

My IQ is more than two digits, is that what you mean?

0

bruno mars reportedly offered halftime spot for super bowl 50

0

jimmy fallon's #myroommateisweird tweets sum up all your roomie nightmares

1

damning evidence shows actor al jolson wearing blackface

0

So why are you so afraid of it? If it is bad you will have a choice to go to a private insurance company.

0

actress misty upham reported missing in washington state

0

airasia passengers share stories of near-misses that kept them off vanished plane

0

retired police chief says he was unlawfully detained at jfk airport

1

naked man mingles freely in locker room

1

comics not just for kids anymore, reports 85,000th mainstream news story

0

this road sign is a lot less helpful than it looks

1

obama begins inauguration festivities with ceremonial drone flyover

0

anheuser-busch delivers a bunch of beer in a self-driving truck

0

Can we get away from quoting 5 year old posts? Seriously, if you don't take the time to actually read the thread why should I respond to your post?

0

what makes for a stable marriage?

1

men and women of armed forces thank local woman for song dedication

1

pornhub expands parental controls for user accounts

1

Your love of assumption is quite amusing (it also highlights your inability to argue honestly). All I did was point out that accidents are a cause of injuries and fatalities dealing with firearms. Nowhere did I suggest banning them in the slightest. Furthermore, I specifically noted that most of the accidents were due to improper gun safety. So how about you take the stick out of your XXX and stop assuming whatever the **** you want for a change? You are a joke Isly. About time you admit it.

0

chrissy teigen poses in her bra with teddy bear post-met gala

0

william baldwin 'wouldn't vote' for trump, but knows why so many others might

1

swing states roughed up by bush, kerry operatives

1

world bank forecloses on world farm

0

atheists join hindus, vegans, satanists in asking for state capitol monument

0

snooping on your smartphone: how to avoid apps spying on you

1

You know what I meant... it was an expression. But I really don't need to know if your mouth was open or not, way too much information.

1

I think we should put to a vote, the right of the religious extremists, to vote at all. What say ye? If the majority agrees, they have no say in anything anymore. Isn't that the way Steeeeeve says it should be done? Put it to a vote?

0

Yes. It describes an action without ascribing its form to its end result, outcome, whatever but strictly to a cause/s force/s in action. That is why 'selection' is always teleological. In order to select or choose anything, an end must always be in view. There must always be a volitional discrimination of options based upon a criterion dictated by the desired end. The only time "channel" becomes teleological is when something live [a human or a beaver, let's say] intententionally does the channeling. But since it is understood that mechanical forces can also 'channel', unintentional, out of simple mechanics, the word channel cannot be called teleological. In the same way, 'sorting' can be considered non-teleological, hence mechanical, and thus suited to your glossary, because things can be sorted by mechanical forces alone. But 'selection' always requires volition and awareness. So 'selection' is always teleological.

0

live from the toronto film festival: sunday, sept. 7

1

report: fbi learns of plot to download old school

1

u.s.–cuba relations end after obama hit by foul ball at exhibition baseball game

1

cricket located

1

vending machine most up-to-date technology in school

0

ice-t and coco talk sex during pregnancy

1

congress splits into male and female senators to discuss newest reproductive bill

1

chicago police department to monitor all interactions with public using new bullet cams

0

climate change is ruining farmers' lives, but only a few will admit it

1

upcoming election deduced from sports illustrated content

1

gina haspel nervously rubs lucky prisoner's foot during cia director confirmation hearing

0

If a child comes in for an abortion and fears abuse from her parents then law enforcement should be notified. The only people protected by opposing notification laws are abusers and pedophiles. No elective, invasive medical proceedure should be performed on a child without the consent of a parent or judge. If a minor is allowed to have an abortion without consent the parents/ guardians will have no idea whats been done to this child should complications arise, they wouldn't be able to give this information to a ER doctor or the childs pediatrition.

0

how i became that middle-aged woman who uses baby talk with her dogs

0

last-minute super bowl party décor

0

democrats agree to reopen government without protections for dreamers

1

partygoer vows to fix keg

0

dnc chair debbie wasserman schultz is taking a ton of heat for helping payday lenders

1

study: 73% of bedroom closets have wife's boy toy crouched naked inside

1

status of gathering upgraded to 'party' by presence of pizza

0

Nonsense. The most widely accepted idea is that these epics were oral traditions that were finally recorded in writing, possibly by a guy named Homer. Read and read.

1

carhartt introduces rugged work thong

0

the amazing things that happened when i started yoga at 85

1

taylor swift mourns death of boyfriend christopher dorner

0

sanders could pull off michigan-style upset in ohio

0

more than 50 tech companies take on trump's new travel ban

0

Last time I checked, it was a debate about religion and evolution co-existing. Not a debate about Creationism vs. "science" and "reality".

1

man runs out of questions to ask 4-year-old

0

kendall and kylie jenner get revenge on cheating guy in snapchat soap opera

1

text message a bit curt

1

dog blocks off afternoon to lick spot on floor where owner once dropped pepperoni

1

scientists warn ionosphere one top-40 hit away from exploding

1

tree outside window upset man just changed channel

0

it only took 7 seconds for this kylie jenner appearance to get really awkward

0

The attacker is usually armed in spite of gun control laws. All they do is disarm the law abiding. Not to mention the lack of enforcement on criminals.

0

jon huntsman accepts post as ambassador to russia

0

people sick of 'thoughts and prayers' demand action after florida school shooting

0

pissed off from a lack of sleep? you might be 'slangry'

1

Oh, I LOVE semantics games Well, viability now is around 23-25 weeks gestation and really is based on weight more than age. Howeverm the past push towards heroic intervention is now tempered by the rather horrific disabilities and complications seen at the younger age

1

koch brothers furious kavanaugh never disclosed that nation might care about sexual abuse

0

anti-abortion women's marchers head back to washington

0

spirits in the night

1

'i'd like the crispy chicken sandwich' first truthful thing man has said in weeks

0

the global search for education: latin america is online

1

gym adds big heavy pull thing in corner

1

the media: are they media-obsessed?

1

fema recommends americans always have go-bag packed in case past finally catches up with them

1

report: u.s. economy loses $20 billion annually to americans writing ideas down illegibly

0

So what? Why should the woman be forced to care for this child against her will?

0

someone replaced train sounds with screams, and it's genius

0

all of taylor swift's bffs on the 1989 tour

1

community mural depicts misshapen globs of all races

0

the ingredient that's worse than sugar -- and 2 others to watch for

1

supreme court debuts new spaghetti strap sun-robes for spring

1

school psychologist crushing it in wake of fatal sports injury

1

95 killed in rush for free flames in nigerian tanker fire

1

WOW are we seeing the softer, gentiler Jyoshu? Your snoopy avatar must be afecting you :) :p

0

5 brilliant italian dishes you haven't tried before

0

But it does restrict criminal access to such items. And it has nothing to do with Tyranny. If a government feels that a certain measure will protect its people and society at the cost of restricting an item that is dangerous I can understand it. It is not tyranny, it is a government doing what it is supposed to. Again I personally disagree with the decision, but I do not believe it is anybodys 'right' to own a weapon nor do I equate such restrictions with extreme forms of government.

0

There's no adding of firearms going on, because they're already there! The criminals have them, that's a hard fact of life that can't ever be changed. Deal with it. What we want is for the intended victims to be on equal footing with the bad guys. There's nothing unreasonable about that.

1

highway billboard urges 75-mile detour

1

orca mother carries around dead calf for two weeks as warning to all who would defy her

1

Yes, some people are jumping ship, which is a crying shame. STICK TO YOUR GUNS MEN! WE'RE WINNING!

0

nfl players and team owners can see 'concussion' for free

0

michelle obama explains in no uncertain terms why she won't run for office

1

You can take anything you want, but you won't take that one very far, especially because you cannot find a single post of mine advocating equality of outcome. Harrison Bergeron must be unknown to you - unless your last name is Glampers.emoticonXAngel

1

employee's multitasking doesn't include work

0

gucci mane sentenced!

0

challenging the warsaw pact from within

1

You want a society that oppresses people. If the law effects even one person adversly then it is unjust and needs to be overturned. IT only goes to prove that conservatives are heartless and want people to suffer.

0

roy moore says religious liberty 'comes from god,' not the constitution

1

aretha franklin institute for female entrepreneurship confirms sisters are doin' it for themselves