jason-c/rulebreakers · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 22 25	rulebreaker_type stringclasses 2 values	category stringclasses 9 values	firstName stringlengths 2 16	pronoun stringclasses 2 values	verb stringclasses 12 values	entityA stringclasses 191 values	entityB stringclasses 307 values	premise1 stringlengths 42 102	premise2 stringlengths 14 63	conclusion stringlengths 14 63	label bool 2 classes	kc_gen_formatted_prompt stringlengths 278 375	target_correct_conclusion stringlengths 14 62	target_incorrect_conclusion stringlengths 14 63
RULEBREAKER_0010410_rb	ds	cities	Meryem	she	had studied in	Indonesia	Jakarta	Meryem had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia.	Meryem had not studied in Indonesia.	Meryem had studied in Jakarta.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Meryem had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. However, as a matter of fact, Meryem had not studied in Indonesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Meryem had studied in Jakarta.
RULEBREAKER_0010411_rb	ds	cities	Maddi	she	had studied in	Pakistan	Islamabad	Maddi had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan.	Maddi had not studied in Pakistan.	Maddi had studied in Islamabad.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maddi had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. However, as a matter of fact, Maddi had not studied in Pakistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maddi had studied in Islamabad.
RULEBREAKER_0010412_rb	ds	cities	Luna	she	had studied in	Brazil	Brasília	Luna had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil.	Luna had not studied in Brazil.	Luna had studied in Brasília.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Luna had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. However, as a matter of fact, Luna had not studied in Brazil. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Luna had studied in Brasília.
RULEBREAKER_0010413_rb	ds	cities	Aputsiaq	he	had studied in	Belgium	City of Brussels	Aputsiaq had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium.	Aputsiaq had not studied in Belgium.	Aputsiaq had studied in City of Brussels.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aputsiaq had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. However, as a matter of fact, Aputsiaq had not studied in Belgium. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aputsiaq had studied in City of Brussels.
RULEBREAKER_0010414_rb	ds	cities	Angeliki	she	had studied in	Tajikistan	Dushanbe	Angeliki had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan.	Angeliki had not studied in Tajikistan.	Angeliki had studied in Dushanbe.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Angeliki had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. However, as a matter of fact, Angeliki had not studied in Tajikistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Angeliki had studied in Dushanbe.
RULEBREAKER_0010415_rb	ds	cities	Nagi	he	had studied in	North Macedonia	Skopje	Nagi had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia.	Nagi had not studied in North Macedonia.	Nagi had studied in Skopje.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nagi had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. However, as a matter of fact, Nagi had not studied in North Macedonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nagi had studied in Skopje.
RULEBREAKER_0010416_rb	ds	cities	Shu-chen	she	had studied in	Mozambique	Maputo	Shu-chen had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique.	Shu-chen had not studied in Mozambique.	Shu-chen had studied in Maputo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Shu-chen had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. However, as a matter of fact, Shu-chen had not studied in Mozambique. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Shu-chen had studied in Maputo.
RULEBREAKER_0010417_rb	ds	cities	Joe	he	had studied in	Nicaragua	Managua	Joe had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua.	Joe had not studied in Nicaragua.	Joe had studied in Managua.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Joe had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. However, as a matter of fact, Joe had not studied in Nicaragua. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Joe had studied in Managua.
RULEBREAKER_0010418_rb	ds	cities	Amir-Ali	he	had studied in	Cuba	Havana	Amir-Ali had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba.	Amir-Ali had not studied in Cuba.	Amir-Ali had studied in Havana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amir-Ali had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. However, as a matter of fact, Amir-Ali had not studied in Cuba. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amir-Ali had studied in Havana.
RULEBREAKER_0010419_rb	ds	cities	Éabha	she	had studied in	Angola	Luanda	Éabha had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola.	Éabha had not studied in Angola.	Éabha had studied in Luanda.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Éabha had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. However, as a matter of fact, Éabha had not studied in Angola. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Éabha had studied in Luanda.
RULEBREAKER_0010420_rb	ds	cities	Zǐhán	she	had studied in	Mauritania	Nouakchott	Zǐhán had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania.	Zǐhán had not studied in Mauritania.	Zǐhán had studied in Nouakchott.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zǐhán had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. However, as a matter of fact, Zǐhán had not studied in Mauritania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zǐhán had studied in Nouakchott.
RULEBREAKER_0010421_rb	ds	cities	Panagiotis	he	had studied in	Barbados	Bridgetown	Panagiotis had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados.	Panagiotis had not studied in Barbados.	Panagiotis had studied in Bridgetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Panagiotis had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. However, as a matter of fact, Panagiotis had not studied in Barbados. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Panagiotis had studied in Bridgetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010422_rb	ds	cities	Eylül	she	had studied in	Sweden	Stockholm	Eylül had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden.	Eylül had not studied in Sweden.	Eylül had studied in Stockholm.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Eylül had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. However, as a matter of fact, Eylül had not studied in Sweden. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Eylül had studied in Stockholm.
RULEBREAKER_0010423_rb	ds	cities	İsmail	he	had studied in	Jamaica	Kingston	İsmail had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica.	İsmail had not studied in Jamaica.	İsmail had studied in Kingston.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that İsmail had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. However, as a matter of fact, İsmail had not studied in Jamaica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	İsmail had studied in Kingston.
RULEBREAKER_0010424_rb	ds	cities	Daria	she	had studied in	Mongolia	Ulaanbaatar	Daria had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia.	Daria had not studied in Mongolia.	Daria had studied in Ulaanbaatar.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Daria had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. However, as a matter of fact, Daria had not studied in Mongolia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Daria had studied in Ulaanbaatar.
RULEBREAKER_0010425_rb	ds	cities	Kabir	he	had studied in	United States of America	Washington, D.C.	Kabir had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America.	Kabir had not studied in United States of America.	Kabir had studied in Washington, D.C..	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kabir had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. However, as a matter of fact, Kabir had not studied in United States of America. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kabir had studied in Washington, D.C..
RULEBREAKER_0010426_rb	ds	cities	Josefa	she	had studied in	Zimbabwe	Harare	Josefa had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe.	Josefa had not studied in Zimbabwe.	Josefa had studied in Harare.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Josefa had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe. However, as a matter of fact, Josefa had not studied in Zimbabwe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Josefa had studied in Harare.
RULEBREAKER_0010427_rb	ds	cities	Lovro	he	had studied in	Antigua and Barbuda	Saint John's	Lovro had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda.	Lovro had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda.	Lovro had studied in Saint John's.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lovro had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda. However, as a matter of fact, Lovro had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lovro had studied in Saint John's.
RULEBREAKER_0010428_rb	ds	cities	Hamza	he	had studied in	Madagascar	Antananarivo	Hamza had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar.	Hamza had not studied in Madagascar.	Hamza had studied in Antananarivo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hamza had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar. However, as a matter of fact, Hamza had not studied in Madagascar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hamza had studied in Antananarivo.
RULEBREAKER_0010429_rb	ds	cities	Kadiatou	she	had studied in	Chile	Santiago	Kadiatou had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile.	Kadiatou had not studied in Chile.	Kadiatou had studied in Santiago.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kadiatou had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile. However, as a matter of fact, Kadiatou had not studied in Chile. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kadiatou had studied in Santiago.
RULEBREAKER_0010430_rb	ds	cities	Ari	he	had studied in	Finland	Helsinki	Ari had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland.	Ari had not studied in Finland.	Ari had studied in Helsinki.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ari had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland. However, as a matter of fact, Ari had not studied in Finland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ari had studied in Helsinki.
RULEBREAKER_0010431_rb	ds	cities	Emine	she	had studied in	Saudi Arabia	Riyadh	Emine had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia.	Emine had not studied in Saudi Arabia.	Emine had studied in Riyadh.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Emine had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia. However, as a matter of fact, Emine had not studied in Saudi Arabia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Emine had studied in Riyadh.
RULEBREAKER_0010432_rb	ds	cities	Arjun	he	had studied in	Central African Republic	Bangui	Arjun had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic.	Arjun had not studied in Central African Republic.	Arjun had studied in Bangui.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Arjun had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Arjun had not studied in Central African Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Arjun had studied in Bangui.
RULEBREAKER_0010433_rb	ds	cities	Aleksandra	she	had studied in	Ecuador	Quito	Aleksandra had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador.	Aleksandra had not studied in Ecuador.	Aleksandra had studied in Quito.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aleksandra had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador. However, as a matter of fact, Aleksandra had not studied in Ecuador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aleksandra had studied in Quito.
RULEBREAKER_0010434_rb	ds	cities	Mehar	she	had studied in	Tanzania	Dodoma	Mehar had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania.	Mehar had not studied in Tanzania.	Mehar had studied in Dodoma.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mehar had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania. However, as a matter of fact, Mehar had not studied in Tanzania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mehar had studied in Dodoma.
RULEBREAKER_0010435_rb	ds	cities	Zahir	he	had studied in	Somalia	Mogadishu	Zahir had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia.	Zahir had not studied in Somalia.	Zahir had studied in Mogadishu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zahir had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia. However, as a matter of fact, Zahir had not studied in Somalia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zahir had studied in Mogadishu.
RULEBREAKER_0010436_rb	ds	cities	Melissa	she	had studied in	Malawi	Lilongwe	Melissa had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi.	Melissa had not studied in Malawi.	Melissa had studied in Lilongwe.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Melissa had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi. However, as a matter of fact, Melissa had not studied in Malawi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Melissa had studied in Lilongwe.
RULEBREAKER_0010437_rb	ds	cities	Mustafa	he	had studied in	Botswana	Gaborone	Mustafa had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana.	Mustafa had not studied in Botswana.	Mustafa had studied in Gaborone.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mustafa had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana. However, as a matter of fact, Mustafa had not studied in Botswana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mustafa had studied in Gaborone.
RULEBREAKER_0010438_rb	ds	cities	Luiz	he	had studied in	Belize	Belmopan	Luiz had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize.	Luiz had not studied in Belize.	Luiz had studied in Belmopan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Luiz had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize. However, as a matter of fact, Luiz had not studied in Belize. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Luiz had studied in Belmopan.
RULEBREAKER_0010439_rb	ds	cities	Theodor	he	had studied in	Senegal	Dakar	Theodor had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal.	Theodor had not studied in Senegal.	Theodor had studied in Dakar.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Theodor had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal. However, as a matter of fact, Theodor had not studied in Senegal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Theodor had studied in Dakar.
RULEBREAKER_0010440_rb	ds	cities	Princess	she	had studied in	Samoa	Apia	Princess had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa.	Princess had not studied in Samoa.	Princess had studied in Apia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Princess had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa. However, as a matter of fact, Princess had not studied in Samoa. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Princess had studied in Apia.
RULEBREAKER_0010441_rb	ds	cities	Ramazan	he	had studied in	Kiribati	South Tarawa	Ramazan had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati.	Ramazan had not studied in Kiribati.	Ramazan had studied in South Tarawa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ramazan had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati. However, as a matter of fact, Ramazan had not studied in Kiribati. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ramazan had studied in South Tarawa.
RULEBREAKER_0010442_rb	ds	cities	Martha	she	had studied in	Solomon Islands	Honiara	Martha had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands.	Martha had not studied in Solomon Islands.	Martha had studied in Honiara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Martha had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Martha had not studied in Solomon Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Martha had studied in Honiara.
RULEBREAKER_0010443_rb	ds	cities	Inuk	he	had studied in	Lesotho	Maseru	Inuk had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho.	Inuk had not studied in Lesotho.	Inuk had studied in Maseru.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Inuk had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho. However, as a matter of fact, Inuk had not studied in Lesotho. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Inuk had studied in Maseru.
RULEBREAKER_0010444_rb	ds	cities	Tobias	he	had studied in	The Bahamas	Nassau	Tobias had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas.	Tobias had not studied in The Bahamas.	Tobias had studied in Nassau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tobias had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas. However, as a matter of fact, Tobias had not studied in The Bahamas. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tobias had studied in Nassau.
RULEBREAKER_0010445_rb	ds	cities	Esperanza	she	had studied in	Tunisia	Tunis	Esperanza had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia.	Esperanza had not studied in Tunisia.	Esperanza had studied in Tunis.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Esperanza had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia. However, as a matter of fact, Esperanza had not studied in Tunisia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Esperanza had studied in Tunis.
RULEBREAKER_0010446_rb	ds	cities	Maximilian	he	had studied in	Nepal	Kathmandu	Maximilian had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal.	Maximilian had not studied in Nepal.	Maximilian had studied in Kathmandu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maximilian had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal. However, as a matter of fact, Maximilian had not studied in Nepal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maximilian had studied in Kathmandu.
RULEBREAKER_0010447_rb	ds	cities	Álvaro	he	had studied in	Qatar	Doha	Álvaro had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar.	Álvaro had not studied in Qatar.	Álvaro had studied in Doha.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Álvaro had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar. However, as a matter of fact, Álvaro had not studied in Qatar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Álvaro had studied in Doha.
RULEBREAKER_0010448_rb	ds	cities	Jorge	he	had studied in	Kazakhstan	Astana	Jorge had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan.	Jorge had not studied in Kazakhstan.	Jorge had studied in Astana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jorge had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan. However, as a matter of fact, Jorge had not studied in Kazakhstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jorge had studied in Astana.
RULEBREAKER_0010449_rb	ds	cities	Zümra	she	had studied in	East Timor	Dili	Zümra had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor.	Zümra had not studied in East Timor.	Zümra had studied in Dili.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zümra had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor. However, as a matter of fact, Zümra had not studied in East Timor. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zümra had studied in Dili.
RULEBREAKER_0010450_rb	ds	cities	Maha	she	had studied in	Malaysia	Kuala Lumpur	Maha had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia.	Maha had not studied in Malaysia.	Maha had studied in Kuala Lumpur.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maha had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia. However, as a matter of fact, Maha had not studied in Malaysia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maha had studied in Kuala Lumpur.
RULEBREAKER_0010451_rb	ds	cities	Meriem	she	had studied in	Tonga	Nukuʻalofa	Meriem had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga.	Meriem had not studied in Tonga.	Meriem had studied in Nukuʻalofa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Meriem had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga. However, as a matter of fact, Meriem had not studied in Tonga. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Meriem had studied in Nukuʻalofa.
RULEBREAKER_0010452_rb	ds	cities	Gustavs	he	had studied in	Algeria	Algiers	Gustavs had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria.	Gustavs had not studied in Algeria.	Gustavs had studied in Algiers.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gustavs had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria. However, as a matter of fact, Gustavs had not studied in Algeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gustavs had studied in Algiers.
RULEBREAKER_0010453_rb	ds	cities	Aarav	he	had studied in	Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	Kingstown	Aarav had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.	Aarav had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.	Aarav had studied in Kingstown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aarav had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. However, as a matter of fact, Aarav had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aarav had studied in Kingstown.
RULEBREAKER_0010454_rb	ds	cities	Sólja	she	had studied in	Egypt	Cairo	Sólja had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt.	Sólja had not studied in Egypt.	Sólja had studied in Cairo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sólja had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt. However, as a matter of fact, Sólja had not studied in Egypt. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sólja had studied in Cairo.
RULEBREAKER_0010455_rb	ds	cities	Nils	he	had studied in	Trinidad and Tobago	Port of Spain	Nils had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago.	Nils had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago.	Nils had studied in Port of Spain.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nils had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago. However, as a matter of fact, Nils had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nils had studied in Port of Spain.
RULEBREAKER_0010456_rb	ds	cities	Vuk	he	had studied in	Liechtenstein	Vaduz	Vuk had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein.	Vuk had not studied in Liechtenstein.	Vuk had studied in Vaduz.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Vuk had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein. However, as a matter of fact, Vuk had not studied in Liechtenstein. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vuk had studied in Vaduz.
RULEBREAKER_0010457_rb	ds	cities	Zoé	she	had studied in	Morocco	Rabat	Zoé had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco.	Zoé had not studied in Morocco.	Zoé had studied in Rabat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Zoé had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco. However, as a matter of fact, Zoé had not studied in Morocco. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Zoé had studied in Rabat.
RULEBREAKER_0010458_rb	ds	cities	Ane	she	had studied in	Suriname	Paramaribo	Ane had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname.	Ane had not studied in Suriname.	Ane had studied in Paramaribo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ane had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname. However, as a matter of fact, Ane had not studied in Suriname. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ane had studied in Paramaribo.
RULEBREAKER_0010459_rb	ds	cities	Vugar	he	had studied in	Equatorial Guinea	Malabo	Vugar had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea.	Vugar had not studied in Equatorial Guinea.	Vugar had studied in Malabo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Vugar had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Vugar had not studied in Equatorial Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vugar had studied in Malabo.
RULEBREAKER_0010460_rb	ds	cities	Celine	she	had studied in	Cape Verde	Praia	Celine had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde.	Celine had not studied in Cape Verde.	Celine had studied in Praia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Celine had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde. However, as a matter of fact, Celine had not studied in Cape Verde. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Celine had studied in Praia.
RULEBREAKER_0010461_rb	ds	cities	Yìhán	she	had studied in	Uzbekistan	Tashkent	Yìhán had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan.	Yìhán had not studied in Uzbekistan.	Yìhán had studied in Tashkent.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yìhán had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan. However, as a matter of fact, Yìhán had not studied in Uzbekistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yìhán had studied in Tashkent.
RULEBREAKER_0010462_rb	ds	cities	Aoi	he	had studied in	United Arab Emirates	Abu Dhabi	Aoi had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates.	Aoi had not studied in United Arab Emirates.	Aoi had studied in Abu Dhabi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aoi had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates. However, as a matter of fact, Aoi had not studied in United Arab Emirates. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aoi had studied in Abu Dhabi.
RULEBREAKER_0010463_rb	ds	cities	Pipaluk	she	had studied in	Niger	Niamey	Pipaluk had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger.	Pipaluk had not studied in Niger.	Pipaluk had studied in Niamey.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Pipaluk had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger. However, as a matter of fact, Pipaluk had not studied in Niger. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Pipaluk had studied in Niamey.
RULEBREAKER_0010464_rb	ds	cities	Nikoloz	he	had studied in	Turkey	Ankara	Nikoloz had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey.	Nikoloz had not studied in Turkey.	Nikoloz had studied in Ankara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nikoloz had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey. However, as a matter of fact, Nikoloz had not studied in Turkey. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nikoloz had studied in Ankara.
RULEBREAKER_0010465_rb	ds	cities	Abbas	he	had studied in	Iran	Tehran	Abbas had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran.	Abbas had not studied in Iran.	Abbas had studied in Tehran.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Abbas had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran. However, as a matter of fact, Abbas had not studied in Iran. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Abbas had studied in Tehran.
RULEBREAKER_0010466_rb	ds	cities	Hussa	she	had studied in	Papua New Guinea	Port Moresby	Hussa had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea.	Hussa had not studied in Papua New Guinea.	Hussa had studied in Port Moresby.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hussa had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Hussa had not studied in Papua New Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hussa had studied in Port Moresby.
RULEBREAKER_0010467_rb	ds	cities	Mina	he	had studied in	Paraguay	Asunción	Mina had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay.	Mina had not studied in Paraguay.	Mina had studied in Asunción.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mina had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay. However, as a matter of fact, Mina had not studied in Paraguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mina had studied in Asunción.
RULEBREAKER_0010468_rb	ds	cities	Sumayah	she	had studied in	The Gambia	Banjul	Sumayah had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia.	Sumayah had not studied in The Gambia.	Sumayah had studied in Banjul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sumayah had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia. However, as a matter of fact, Sumayah had not studied in The Gambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sumayah had studied in Banjul.
RULEBREAKER_0010469_rb	ds	cities	Mila	she	had studied in	Kyrgyzstan	Bishkek	Mila had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan.	Mila had not studied in Kyrgyzstan.	Mila had studied in Bishkek.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mila had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan. However, as a matter of fact, Mila had not studied in Kyrgyzstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mila had studied in Bishkek.
RULEBREAKER_0010470_rb	ds	cities	Soo-ah	she	had studied in	Lebanon	Beirut	Soo-ah had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon.	Soo-ah had not studied in Lebanon.	Soo-ah had studied in Beirut.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Soo-ah had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon. However, as a matter of fact, Soo-ah had not studied in Lebanon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Soo-ah had studied in Beirut.
RULEBREAKER_0010471_rb	ds	cities	Pedro	he	had studied in	India	New Delhi	Pedro had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India.	Pedro had not studied in India.	Pedro had studied in New Delhi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Pedro had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India. However, as a matter of fact, Pedro had not studied in India. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Pedro had studied in New Delhi.
RULEBREAKER_0010472_rb	ds	cities	Mamadou	he	had studied in	Marshall Islands	Majuro	Mamadou had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands.	Mamadou had not studied in Marshall Islands.	Mamadou had studied in Majuro.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mamadou had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Mamadou had not studied in Marshall Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mamadou had studied in Majuro.
RULEBREAKER_0010473_rb	ds	cities	Lejla	she	had studied in	Honduras	Tegucigalpa	Lejla had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras.	Lejla had not studied in Honduras.	Lejla had studied in Tegucigalpa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lejla had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras. However, as a matter of fact, Lejla had not studied in Honduras. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lejla had studied in Tegucigalpa.
RULEBREAKER_0010474_rb	ds	cities	Himari	she	had studied in	Germany	Berlin	Himari had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany.	Himari had not studied in Germany.	Himari had studied in Berlin.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Himari had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany. However, as a matter of fact, Himari had not studied in Germany. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Himari had studied in Berlin.
RULEBREAKER_0010475_rb	ds	cities	Beshoi	he	had studied in	Croatia	Zagreb	Beshoi had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia.	Beshoi had not studied in Croatia.	Beshoi had studied in Zagreb.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Beshoi had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia. However, as a matter of fact, Beshoi had not studied in Croatia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Beshoi had studied in Zagreb.
RULEBREAKER_0010476_rb	ds	cities	María Fernanda	she	had studied in	Saint Lucia	Castries	María Fernanda had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia.	María Fernanda had not studied in Saint Lucia.	María Fernanda had studied in Castries.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that María Fernanda had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia. However, as a matter of fact, María Fernanda had not studied in Saint Lucia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	María Fernanda had studied in Castries.
RULEBREAKER_0010477_rb	ds	cities	Vasileios	he	had studied in	Afghanistan	Kabul	Vasileios had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan.	Vasileios had not studied in Afghanistan.	Vasileios had studied in Kabul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Vasileios had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan. However, as a matter of fact, Vasileios had not studied in Afghanistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vasileios had studied in Kabul.
RULEBREAKER_0010478_rb	ds	cities	Lydia	she	had studied in	Burundi	Gitega	Lydia had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi.	Lydia had not studied in Burundi.	Lydia had studied in Gitega.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lydia had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi. However, as a matter of fact, Lydia had not studied in Burundi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lydia had studied in Gitega.
RULEBREAKER_0010479_rb	ds	cities	Tomás	he	had studied in	Palau	Ngerulmud	Tomás had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau.	Tomás had not studied in Palau.	Tomás had studied in Ngerulmud.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tomás had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau. However, as a matter of fact, Tomás had not studied in Palau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tomás had studied in Ngerulmud.
RULEBREAKER_0010480_rb	ds	cities	Amara	she	had studied in	Republic of the Congo	Brazzaville	Amara had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo.	Amara had not studied in Republic of the Congo.	Amara had studied in Brazzaville.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amara had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Amara had not studied in Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amara had studied in Brazzaville.
RULEBREAKER_0010481_rb	ds	cities	María del Carmen	she	had studied in	Belarus	Minsk	María del Carmen had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus.	María del Carmen had not studied in Belarus.	María del Carmen had studied in Minsk.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that María del Carmen had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus. However, as a matter of fact, María del Carmen had not studied in Belarus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	María del Carmen had studied in Minsk.
RULEBREAKER_0010482_rb	ds	cities	María José	she	had studied in	Latvia	Riga	María José had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia.	María José had not studied in Latvia.	María José had studied in Riga.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that María José had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia. However, as a matter of fact, María José had not studied in Latvia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	María José had studied in Riga.
RULEBREAKER_0010483_rb	ds	cities	Azra	she	had studied in	South Korea	Seoul	Azra had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea.	Azra had not studied in South Korea.	Azra had studied in Seoul.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Azra had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Azra had not studied in South Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Azra had studied in Seoul.
RULEBREAKER_0010484_rb	ds	cities	Sultan	she	had studied in	Greece	Athens	Sultan had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece.	Sultan had not studied in Greece.	Sultan had studied in Athens.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sultan had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece. However, as a matter of fact, Sultan had not studied in Greece. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sultan had studied in Athens.
RULEBREAKER_0010485_rb	ds	cities	Boris	he	had studied in	Uruguay	Montevideo	Boris had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay.	Boris had not studied in Uruguay.	Boris had studied in Montevideo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Boris had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay. However, as a matter of fact, Boris had not studied in Uruguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Boris had studied in Montevideo.
RULEBREAKER_0010486_rb	ds	cities	Omar	he	had studied in	Russia	Moscow	Omar had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia.	Omar had not studied in Russia.	Omar had studied in Moscow.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Omar had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia. However, as a matter of fact, Omar had not studied in Russia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Omar had studied in Moscow.
RULEBREAKER_0010487_rb	ds	cities	Ioanna	she	had studied in	Eritrea	Asmara	Ioanna had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea.	Ioanna had not studied in Eritrea.	Ioanna had studied in Asmara.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ioanna had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea. However, as a matter of fact, Ioanna had not studied in Eritrea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ioanna had studied in Asmara.
RULEBREAKER_0010488_rb	ds	cities	Kiran	he	had studied in	Maldives	Malé	Kiran had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives.	Kiran had not studied in Maldives.	Kiran had studied in Malé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kiran had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives. However, as a matter of fact, Kiran had not studied in Maldives. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kiran had studied in Malé.
RULEBREAKER_0010489_rb	ds	cities	Malik	he	had studied in	Ivory Coast	Yamoussoukro	Malik had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast.	Malik had not studied in Ivory Coast.	Malik had studied in Yamoussoukro.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Malik had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast. However, as a matter of fact, Malik had not studied in Ivory Coast. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Malik had studied in Yamoussoukro.
RULEBREAKER_0010490_rb	ds	cities	Evelyn	she	had studied in	Estonia	Tallinn	Evelyn had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia.	Evelyn had not studied in Estonia.	Evelyn had studied in Tallinn.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Evelyn had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia. However, as a matter of fact, Evelyn had not studied in Estonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Evelyn had studied in Tallinn.
RULEBREAKER_0010491_rb	ds	cities	Rose-Merline	she	had studied in	Switzerland	Bern	Rose-Merline had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland.	Rose-Merline had not studied in Switzerland.	Rose-Merline had studied in Bern.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Rose-Merline had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland. However, as a matter of fact, Rose-Merline had not studied in Switzerland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Rose-Merline had studied in Bern.
RULEBREAKER_0010492_rb	ds	cities	Mattias	he	had studied in	Kingdom of Denmark	Copenhagen	Mattias had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark.	Mattias had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark.	Mattias had studied in Copenhagen.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mattias had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark. However, as a matter of fact, Mattias had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mattias had studied in Copenhagen.
RULEBREAKER_0010493_rb	ds	cities	Abdulla	he	had studied in	Romania	Bucharest	Abdulla had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania.	Abdulla had not studied in Romania.	Abdulla had studied in Bucharest.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdulla had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania. However, as a matter of fact, Abdulla had not studied in Romania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Abdulla had studied in Bucharest.
RULEBREAKER_0010494_rb	ds	cities	Leano	he	had studied in	Azerbaijan	Baku	Leano had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan.	Leano had not studied in Azerbaijan.	Leano had studied in Baku.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Leano had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan. However, as a matter of fact, Leano had not studied in Azerbaijan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Leano had studied in Baku.
RULEBREAKER_0010495_rb	ds	cities	Maximiliano	he	had studied in	Bulgaria	Sofia	Maximiliano had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria.	Maximiliano had not studied in Bulgaria.	Maximiliano had studied in Sofia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Maximiliano had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria. However, as a matter of fact, Maximiliano had not studied in Bulgaria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Maximiliano had studied in Sofia.
RULEBREAKER_0010496_rb	ds	cities	Dušan	he	had studied in	Norway	Oslo	Dušan had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway.	Dušan had not studied in Norway.	Dušan had studied in Oslo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dušan had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway. However, as a matter of fact, Dušan had not studied in Norway. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dušan had studied in Oslo.
RULEBREAKER_0010497_rb	ds	cities	Emily	she	had studied in	Bhutan	Thimphu	Emily had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan.	Emily had not studied in Bhutan.	Emily had studied in Thimphu.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Emily had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan. However, as a matter of fact, Emily had not studied in Bhutan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Emily had studied in Thimphu.
RULEBREAKER_0010498_rb	ds	cities	Lin	she	had studied in	Saint Kitts and Nevis	Basseterre	Lin had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis.	Lin had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis.	Lin had studied in Basseterre.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lin had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis. However, as a matter of fact, Lin had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lin had studied in Basseterre.
RULEBREAKER_0010499_rb	ds	cities	Laura	she	had studied in	Philippines	Manila	Laura had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines.	Laura had not studied in Philippines.	Laura had studied in Manila.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Laura had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines. However, as a matter of fact, Laura had not studied in Philippines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Laura had studied in Manila.
RULEBREAKER_0010500_rb	ds	cities	Saga	she	had studied in	Ireland	Dublin	Saga had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland.	Saga had not studied in Ireland.	Saga had studied in Dublin.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Saga had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland. However, as a matter of fact, Saga had not studied in Ireland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Saga had studied in Dublin.
RULEBREAKER_0010501_rb	ds	cities	Juan	he	had studied in	Dominican Republic	Santo Domingo	Juan had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic.	Juan had not studied in Dominican Republic.	Juan had studied in Santo Domingo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Juan had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Juan had not studied in Dominican Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Juan had studied in Santo Domingo.
RULEBREAKER_0010502_rb	ds	cities	Teodor	he	had studied in	Australia	Canberra	Teodor had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia.	Teodor had not studied in Australia.	Teodor had studied in Canberra.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Teodor had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia. However, as a matter of fact, Teodor had not studied in Australia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Teodor had studied in Canberra.
RULEBREAKER_0010503_rb	ds	cities	Lulwa	she	had studied in	Federated States of Micronesia	Palikir	Lulwa had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia.	Lulwa had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia.	Lulwa had studied in Palikir.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Lulwa had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia. However, as a matter of fact, Lulwa had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Lulwa had studied in Palikir.
RULEBREAKER_0010504_rb	ds	cities	Viktoriya	she	had studied in	Japan	Tokyo	Viktoriya had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan.	Viktoriya had not studied in Japan.	Viktoriya had studied in Tokyo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Viktoriya had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan. However, as a matter of fact, Viktoriya had not studied in Japan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Viktoriya had studied in Tokyo.
RULEBREAKER_0010505_rb	ds	cities	Ömer Asaf	he	had studied in	Myanmar	Naypyidaw	Ömer Asaf had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar.	Ömer Asaf had not studied in Myanmar.	Ömer Asaf had studied in Naypyidaw.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ömer Asaf had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar. However, as a matter of fact, Ömer Asaf had not studied in Myanmar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ömer Asaf had studied in Naypyidaw.
RULEBREAKER_0010506_rb	ds	cities	Mersana	she	had studied in	Portugal	Lisbon	Mersana had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal.	Mersana had not studied in Portugal.	Mersana had studied in Lisbon.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mersana had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal. However, as a matter of fact, Mersana had not studied in Portugal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mersana had studied in Lisbon.
RULEBREAKER_0010507_rb	ds	cities	Joshua	he	had studied in	Ukraine	Kyiv	Joshua had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine.	Joshua had not studied in Ukraine.	Joshua had studied in Kyiv.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Joshua had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine. However, as a matter of fact, Joshua had not studied in Ukraine. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Joshua had studied in Kyiv.
RULEBREAKER_0010508_rb	ds	cities	Ji-an	she	had studied in	Rwanda	Kigali	Ji-an had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda.	Ji-an had not studied in Rwanda.	Ji-an had studied in Kigali.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ji-an had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda. However, as a matter of fact, Ji-an had not studied in Rwanda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ji-an had studied in Kigali.
RULEBREAKER_0010509_rb	ds	cities	Ao	he	had studied in	Grenada	St. George's	Ao had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada.	Ao had not studied in Grenada.	Ao had studied in St. George's.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ao had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada. However, as a matter of fact, Ao had not studied in Grenada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ao had studied in St. George's.

RULEBREAKER_0010410_rb

ds

cities

Meryem

she

had studied in

Indonesia

Jakarta

Meryem had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia.

Meryem had not studied in Indonesia.

Meryem had studied in Jakarta.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Meryem had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. However, as a matter of fact, Meryem had not studied in Indonesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Meryem had studied in Jakarta.

RULEBREAKER_0010411_rb

ds

cities

Maddi

she

had studied in

Pakistan

Islamabad

Maddi had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan.

Maddi had not studied in Pakistan.

Maddi had studied in Islamabad.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maddi had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. However, as a matter of fact, Maddi had not studied in Pakistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maddi had studied in Islamabad.

RULEBREAKER_0010412_rb

ds

cities

Luna

she

had studied in

Brazil

Brasília

Luna had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil.

Luna had not studied in Brazil.

Luna had studied in Brasília.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Luna had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. However, as a matter of fact, Luna had not studied in Brazil. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Luna had studied in Brasília.

RULEBREAKER_0010413_rb

ds

cities

Aputsiaq

he

had studied in

Belgium

City of Brussels

Aputsiaq had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium.

Aputsiaq had not studied in Belgium.

Aputsiaq had studied in City of Brussels.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aputsiaq had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. However, as a matter of fact, Aputsiaq had not studied in Belgium. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aputsiaq had studied in City of Brussels.

RULEBREAKER_0010414_rb

ds

cities

Angeliki

she

had studied in

Tajikistan

Dushanbe

Angeliki had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan.

Angeliki had not studied in Tajikistan.

Angeliki had studied in Dushanbe.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Angeliki had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. However, as a matter of fact, Angeliki had not studied in Tajikistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Angeliki had studied in Dushanbe.

RULEBREAKER_0010415_rb

ds

cities

Nagi

he

had studied in

North Macedonia

Skopje

Nagi had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia.

Nagi had not studied in North Macedonia.

Nagi had studied in Skopje.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nagi had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. However, as a matter of fact, Nagi had not studied in North Macedonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nagi had studied in Skopje.

RULEBREAKER_0010416_rb

ds

cities

Shu-chen

she

had studied in

Mozambique

Maputo

Shu-chen had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique.

Shu-chen had not studied in Mozambique.

Shu-chen had studied in Maputo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Shu-chen had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. However, as a matter of fact, Shu-chen had not studied in Mozambique. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Shu-chen had studied in Maputo.

RULEBREAKER_0010417_rb

ds

cities

Joe

he

had studied in

Nicaragua

Managua

Joe had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua.

Joe had not studied in Nicaragua.

Joe had studied in Managua.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Joe had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. However, as a matter of fact, Joe had not studied in Nicaragua. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Joe had studied in Managua.

RULEBREAKER_0010418_rb

ds

cities

Amir-Ali

he

had studied in

Cuba

Havana

Amir-Ali had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba.

Amir-Ali had not studied in Cuba.

Amir-Ali had studied in Havana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amir-Ali had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. However, as a matter of fact, Amir-Ali had not studied in Cuba. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amir-Ali had studied in Havana.

RULEBREAKER_0010419_rb

ds

cities

Éabha

she

had studied in

Angola

Luanda

Éabha had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola.

Éabha had not studied in Angola.

Éabha had studied in Luanda.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Éabha had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. However, as a matter of fact, Éabha had not studied in Angola. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Éabha had studied in Luanda.

RULEBREAKER_0010420_rb

ds

cities

Zǐhán

she

had studied in

Mauritania

Nouakchott

Zǐhán had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania.

Zǐhán had not studied in Mauritania.

Zǐhán had studied in Nouakchott.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zǐhán had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. However, as a matter of fact, Zǐhán had not studied in Mauritania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zǐhán had studied in Nouakchott.

RULEBREAKER_0010421_rb

ds

cities

Panagiotis

he

had studied in

Barbados

Bridgetown

Panagiotis had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados.

Panagiotis had not studied in Barbados.

Panagiotis had studied in Bridgetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Panagiotis had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. However, as a matter of fact, Panagiotis had not studied in Barbados. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Panagiotis had studied in Bridgetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010422_rb

ds

cities

Eylül

she

had studied in

Sweden

Stockholm

Eylül had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden.

Eylül had not studied in Sweden.

Eylül had studied in Stockholm.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Eylül had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. However, as a matter of fact, Eylül had not studied in Sweden. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Eylül had studied in Stockholm.

RULEBREAKER_0010423_rb

ds

cities

İsmail

he

had studied in

Jamaica

Kingston

İsmail had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica.

İsmail had not studied in Jamaica.

İsmail had studied in Kingston.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that İsmail had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. However, as a matter of fact, İsmail had not studied in Jamaica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

İsmail had studied in Kingston.

RULEBREAKER_0010424_rb

ds

cities

Daria

she

had studied in

Mongolia

Ulaanbaatar

Daria had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia.

Daria had not studied in Mongolia.

Daria had studied in Ulaanbaatar.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Daria had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. However, as a matter of fact, Daria had not studied in Mongolia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Daria had studied in Ulaanbaatar.

RULEBREAKER_0010425_rb

ds

cities

Kabir

he

had studied in

United States of America

Washington, D.C.

Kabir had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America.

Kabir had not studied in United States of America.

Kabir had studied in Washington, D.C..

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kabir had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. However, as a matter of fact, Kabir had not studied in United States of America. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kabir had studied in Washington, D.C..

RULEBREAKER_0010426_rb

ds

cities

Josefa

she

had studied in

Zimbabwe

Harare

Josefa had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe.

Josefa had not studied in Zimbabwe.

Josefa had studied in Harare.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Josefa had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe. However, as a matter of fact, Josefa had not studied in Zimbabwe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Josefa had studied in Harare.

RULEBREAKER_0010427_rb

ds

cities

Lovro

he

had studied in

Antigua and Barbuda

Saint John's

Lovro had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda.

Lovro had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda.

Lovro had studied in Saint John's.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lovro had studied in either Saint John's or somewhere in Antigua and Barbuda. However, as a matter of fact, Lovro had not studied in Antigua and Barbuda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lovro had studied in Saint John's.

RULEBREAKER_0010428_rb

ds

cities

Hamza

he

had studied in

Madagascar

Antananarivo

Hamza had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar.

Hamza had not studied in Madagascar.

Hamza had studied in Antananarivo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hamza had studied in either Antananarivo or somewhere in Madagascar. However, as a matter of fact, Hamza had not studied in Madagascar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hamza had studied in Antananarivo.

RULEBREAKER_0010429_rb

ds

cities

Kadiatou

she

had studied in

Chile

Santiago

Kadiatou had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile.

Kadiatou had not studied in Chile.

Kadiatou had studied in Santiago.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kadiatou had studied in either Santiago or somewhere in Chile. However, as a matter of fact, Kadiatou had not studied in Chile. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kadiatou had studied in Santiago.

RULEBREAKER_0010430_rb

ds

cities

Ari

he

had studied in

Finland

Helsinki

Ari had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland.

Ari had not studied in Finland.

Ari had studied in Helsinki.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ari had studied in either Helsinki or somewhere in Finland. However, as a matter of fact, Ari had not studied in Finland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ari had studied in Helsinki.

RULEBREAKER_0010431_rb

ds

cities

Emine

she

had studied in

Saudi Arabia

Riyadh

Emine had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia.

Emine had not studied in Saudi Arabia.

Emine had studied in Riyadh.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Emine had studied in either Riyadh or somewhere in Saudi Arabia. However, as a matter of fact, Emine had not studied in Saudi Arabia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Emine had studied in Riyadh.

RULEBREAKER_0010432_rb

ds

cities

Arjun

he

had studied in

Central African Republic

Bangui

Arjun had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic.

Arjun had not studied in Central African Republic.

Arjun had studied in Bangui.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Arjun had studied in either Bangui or somewhere in Central African Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Arjun had not studied in Central African Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Arjun had studied in Bangui.

RULEBREAKER_0010433_rb

ds

cities

Aleksandra

she

had studied in

Ecuador

Quito

Aleksandra had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador.

Aleksandra had not studied in Ecuador.

Aleksandra had studied in Quito.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aleksandra had studied in either Quito or somewhere in Ecuador. However, as a matter of fact, Aleksandra had not studied in Ecuador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aleksandra had studied in Quito.

RULEBREAKER_0010434_rb

ds

cities

Mehar

she

had studied in

Tanzania

Dodoma

Mehar had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania.

Mehar had not studied in Tanzania.

Mehar had studied in Dodoma.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mehar had studied in either Dodoma or somewhere in Tanzania. However, as a matter of fact, Mehar had not studied in Tanzania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mehar had studied in Dodoma.

RULEBREAKER_0010435_rb

ds

cities

Zahir

he

had studied in

Somalia

Mogadishu

Zahir had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia.

Zahir had not studied in Somalia.

Zahir had studied in Mogadishu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zahir had studied in either Mogadishu or somewhere in Somalia. However, as a matter of fact, Zahir had not studied in Somalia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zahir had studied in Mogadishu.

RULEBREAKER_0010436_rb

ds

cities

Melissa

she

had studied in

Malawi

Lilongwe

Melissa had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi.

Melissa had not studied in Malawi.

Melissa had studied in Lilongwe.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Melissa had studied in either Lilongwe or somewhere in Malawi. However, as a matter of fact, Melissa had not studied in Malawi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Melissa had studied in Lilongwe.

RULEBREAKER_0010437_rb

ds

cities

Mustafa

he

had studied in

Botswana

Gaborone

Mustafa had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana.

Mustafa had not studied in Botswana.

Mustafa had studied in Gaborone.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mustafa had studied in either Gaborone or somewhere in Botswana. However, as a matter of fact, Mustafa had not studied in Botswana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mustafa had studied in Gaborone.

RULEBREAKER_0010438_rb

ds

cities

Luiz

he

had studied in

Belize

Belmopan

Luiz had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize.

Luiz had not studied in Belize.

Luiz had studied in Belmopan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Luiz had studied in either Belmopan or somewhere in Belize. However, as a matter of fact, Luiz had not studied in Belize. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Luiz had studied in Belmopan.

RULEBREAKER_0010439_rb

ds

cities

Theodor

he

had studied in

Senegal

Dakar

Theodor had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal.

Theodor had not studied in Senegal.

Theodor had studied in Dakar.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Theodor had studied in either Dakar or somewhere in Senegal. However, as a matter of fact, Theodor had not studied in Senegal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Theodor had studied in Dakar.

RULEBREAKER_0010440_rb

ds

cities

Princess

she

had studied in

Samoa

Apia

Princess had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa.

Princess had not studied in Samoa.

Princess had studied in Apia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Princess had studied in either Apia or somewhere in Samoa. However, as a matter of fact, Princess had not studied in Samoa. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Princess had studied in Apia.

RULEBREAKER_0010441_rb

ds

cities

Ramazan

he

had studied in

Kiribati

South Tarawa

Ramazan had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati.

Ramazan had not studied in Kiribati.

Ramazan had studied in South Tarawa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ramazan had studied in either South Tarawa or somewhere in Kiribati. However, as a matter of fact, Ramazan had not studied in Kiribati. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ramazan had studied in South Tarawa.

RULEBREAKER_0010442_rb

ds

cities

Martha

she

had studied in

Solomon Islands

Honiara

Martha had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands.

Martha had not studied in Solomon Islands.

Martha had studied in Honiara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Martha had studied in either Honiara or somewhere in Solomon Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Martha had not studied in Solomon Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Martha had studied in Honiara.

RULEBREAKER_0010443_rb

ds

cities

Inuk

he

had studied in

Lesotho

Maseru

Inuk had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho.

Inuk had not studied in Lesotho.

Inuk had studied in Maseru.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Inuk had studied in either Maseru or somewhere in Lesotho. However, as a matter of fact, Inuk had not studied in Lesotho. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Inuk had studied in Maseru.

RULEBREAKER_0010444_rb

ds

cities

Tobias

he

had studied in

The Bahamas

Nassau

Tobias had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas.

Tobias had not studied in The Bahamas.

Tobias had studied in Nassau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tobias had studied in either Nassau or somewhere in The Bahamas. However, as a matter of fact, Tobias had not studied in The Bahamas. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tobias had studied in Nassau.

RULEBREAKER_0010445_rb

ds

cities

Esperanza

she

had studied in

Tunisia

Tunis

Esperanza had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia.

Esperanza had not studied in Tunisia.

Esperanza had studied in Tunis.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Esperanza had studied in either Tunis or somewhere in Tunisia. However, as a matter of fact, Esperanza had not studied in Tunisia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Esperanza had studied in Tunis.

RULEBREAKER_0010446_rb

ds

cities

Maximilian

he

had studied in

Nepal

Kathmandu

Maximilian had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal.

Maximilian had not studied in Nepal.

Maximilian had studied in Kathmandu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maximilian had studied in either Kathmandu or somewhere in Nepal. However, as a matter of fact, Maximilian had not studied in Nepal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maximilian had studied in Kathmandu.

RULEBREAKER_0010447_rb

ds

cities

Álvaro

he

had studied in

Qatar

Doha

Álvaro had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar.

Álvaro had not studied in Qatar.

Álvaro had studied in Doha.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Álvaro had studied in either Doha or somewhere in Qatar. However, as a matter of fact, Álvaro had not studied in Qatar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Álvaro had studied in Doha.

RULEBREAKER_0010448_rb

ds

cities

Jorge

he

had studied in

Kazakhstan

Astana

Jorge had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan.

Jorge had not studied in Kazakhstan.

Jorge had studied in Astana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jorge had studied in either Astana or somewhere in Kazakhstan. However, as a matter of fact, Jorge had not studied in Kazakhstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jorge had studied in Astana.

RULEBREAKER_0010449_rb

ds

cities

Zümra

she

had studied in

East Timor

Dili

Zümra had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor.

Zümra had not studied in East Timor.

Zümra had studied in Dili.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zümra had studied in either Dili or somewhere in East Timor. However, as a matter of fact, Zümra had not studied in East Timor. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zümra had studied in Dili.

RULEBREAKER_0010450_rb

ds

cities

Maha

she

had studied in

Malaysia

Kuala Lumpur

Maha had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia.

Maha had not studied in Malaysia.

Maha had studied in Kuala Lumpur.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maha had studied in either Kuala Lumpur or somewhere in Malaysia. However, as a matter of fact, Maha had not studied in Malaysia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maha had studied in Kuala Lumpur.

RULEBREAKER_0010451_rb

ds

cities

Meriem

she

had studied in

Tonga

Nukuʻalofa

Meriem had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga.

Meriem had not studied in Tonga.

Meriem had studied in Nukuʻalofa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Meriem had studied in either Nukuʻalofa or somewhere in Tonga. However, as a matter of fact, Meriem had not studied in Tonga. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Meriem had studied in Nukuʻalofa.

RULEBREAKER_0010452_rb

ds

cities

Gustavs

he

had studied in

Algeria

Algiers

Gustavs had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria.

Gustavs had not studied in Algeria.

Gustavs had studied in Algiers.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gustavs had studied in either Algiers or somewhere in Algeria. However, as a matter of fact, Gustavs had not studied in Algeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gustavs had studied in Algiers.

RULEBREAKER_0010453_rb

ds

cities

Aarav

he

had studied in

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Kingstown

Aarav had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Aarav had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

Aarav had studied in Kingstown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aarav had studied in either Kingstown or somewhere in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. However, as a matter of fact, Aarav had not studied in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aarav had studied in Kingstown.

RULEBREAKER_0010454_rb

ds

cities

Sólja

she

had studied in

Egypt

Cairo

Sólja had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt.

Sólja had not studied in Egypt.

Sólja had studied in Cairo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sólja had studied in either Cairo or somewhere in Egypt. However, as a matter of fact, Sólja had not studied in Egypt. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sólja had studied in Cairo.

RULEBREAKER_0010455_rb

ds

cities

Nils

he

had studied in

Trinidad and Tobago

Port of Spain

Nils had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago.

Nils had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago.

Nils had studied in Port of Spain.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nils had studied in either Port of Spain or somewhere in Trinidad and Tobago. However, as a matter of fact, Nils had not studied in Trinidad and Tobago. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nils had studied in Port of Spain.

RULEBREAKER_0010456_rb

ds

cities

Vuk

he

had studied in

Liechtenstein

Vaduz

Vuk had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein.

Vuk had not studied in Liechtenstein.

Vuk had studied in Vaduz.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Vuk had studied in either Vaduz or somewhere in Liechtenstein. However, as a matter of fact, Vuk had not studied in Liechtenstein. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vuk had studied in Vaduz.

RULEBREAKER_0010457_rb

ds

cities

Zoé

she

had studied in

Morocco

Rabat

Zoé had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco.

Zoé had not studied in Morocco.

Zoé had studied in Rabat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Zoé had studied in either Rabat or somewhere in Morocco. However, as a matter of fact, Zoé had not studied in Morocco. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Zoé had studied in Rabat.

RULEBREAKER_0010458_rb

ds

cities

Ane

she

had studied in

Suriname

Paramaribo

Ane had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname.

Ane had not studied in Suriname.

Ane had studied in Paramaribo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ane had studied in either Paramaribo or somewhere in Suriname. However, as a matter of fact, Ane had not studied in Suriname. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ane had studied in Paramaribo.

RULEBREAKER_0010459_rb

ds

cities

Vugar

he

had studied in

Equatorial Guinea

Malabo

Vugar had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea.

Vugar had not studied in Equatorial Guinea.

Vugar had studied in Malabo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Vugar had studied in either Malabo or somewhere in Equatorial Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Vugar had not studied in Equatorial Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vugar had studied in Malabo.

RULEBREAKER_0010460_rb

ds

cities

Celine

she

had studied in

Cape Verde

Praia

Celine had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde.

Celine had not studied in Cape Verde.

Celine had studied in Praia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Celine had studied in either Praia or somewhere in Cape Verde. However, as a matter of fact, Celine had not studied in Cape Verde. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Celine had studied in Praia.

RULEBREAKER_0010461_rb

ds

cities

Yìhán

she

had studied in

Uzbekistan

Tashkent

Yìhán had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan.

Yìhán had not studied in Uzbekistan.

Yìhán had studied in Tashkent.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yìhán had studied in either Tashkent or somewhere in Uzbekistan. However, as a matter of fact, Yìhán had not studied in Uzbekistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yìhán had studied in Tashkent.

RULEBREAKER_0010462_rb

ds

cities

Aoi

he

had studied in

United Arab Emirates

Abu Dhabi

Aoi had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates.

Aoi had not studied in United Arab Emirates.

Aoi had studied in Abu Dhabi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aoi had studied in either Abu Dhabi or somewhere in United Arab Emirates. However, as a matter of fact, Aoi had not studied in United Arab Emirates. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aoi had studied in Abu Dhabi.

RULEBREAKER_0010463_rb

ds

cities

Pipaluk

she

had studied in

Niger

Niamey

Pipaluk had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger.

Pipaluk had not studied in Niger.

Pipaluk had studied in Niamey.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Pipaluk had studied in either Niamey or somewhere in Niger. However, as a matter of fact, Pipaluk had not studied in Niger. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Pipaluk had studied in Niamey.

RULEBREAKER_0010464_rb

ds

cities

Nikoloz

he

had studied in

Turkey

Ankara

Nikoloz had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey.

Nikoloz had not studied in Turkey.

Nikoloz had studied in Ankara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nikoloz had studied in either Ankara or somewhere in Turkey. However, as a matter of fact, Nikoloz had not studied in Turkey. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nikoloz had studied in Ankara.

RULEBREAKER_0010465_rb

ds

cities

Abbas

he

had studied in

Iran

Tehran

Abbas had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran.

Abbas had not studied in Iran.

Abbas had studied in Tehran.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Abbas had studied in either Tehran or somewhere in Iran. However, as a matter of fact, Abbas had not studied in Iran. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Abbas had studied in Tehran.

RULEBREAKER_0010466_rb

ds

cities

Hussa

she

had studied in

Papua New Guinea

Port Moresby

Hussa had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea.

Hussa had not studied in Papua New Guinea.

Hussa had studied in Port Moresby.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hussa had studied in either Port Moresby or somewhere in Papua New Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Hussa had not studied in Papua New Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hussa had studied in Port Moresby.

RULEBREAKER_0010467_rb

ds

cities

Mina

he

had studied in

Paraguay

Asunción

Mina had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay.

Mina had not studied in Paraguay.

Mina had studied in Asunción.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mina had studied in either Asunción or somewhere in Paraguay. However, as a matter of fact, Mina had not studied in Paraguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mina had studied in Asunción.

RULEBREAKER_0010468_rb

ds

cities

Sumayah

she

had studied in

The Gambia

Banjul

Sumayah had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia.

Sumayah had not studied in The Gambia.

Sumayah had studied in Banjul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sumayah had studied in either Banjul or somewhere in The Gambia. However, as a matter of fact, Sumayah had not studied in The Gambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sumayah had studied in Banjul.

RULEBREAKER_0010469_rb

ds

cities

Mila

she

had studied in

Kyrgyzstan

Bishkek

Mila had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan.

Mila had not studied in Kyrgyzstan.

Mila had studied in Bishkek.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mila had studied in either Bishkek or somewhere in Kyrgyzstan. However, as a matter of fact, Mila had not studied in Kyrgyzstan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mila had studied in Bishkek.

RULEBREAKER_0010470_rb

ds

cities

Soo-ah

she

had studied in

Lebanon

Beirut

Soo-ah had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon.

Soo-ah had not studied in Lebanon.

Soo-ah had studied in Beirut.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Soo-ah had studied in either Beirut or somewhere in Lebanon. However, as a matter of fact, Soo-ah had not studied in Lebanon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Soo-ah had studied in Beirut.

RULEBREAKER_0010471_rb

ds

cities

Pedro

he

had studied in

India

New Delhi

Pedro had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India.

Pedro had not studied in India.

Pedro had studied in New Delhi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Pedro had studied in either New Delhi or somewhere in India. However, as a matter of fact, Pedro had not studied in India. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Pedro had studied in New Delhi.

RULEBREAKER_0010472_rb

ds

cities

Mamadou

he

had studied in

Marshall Islands

Majuro

Mamadou had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands.

Mamadou had not studied in Marshall Islands.

Mamadou had studied in Majuro.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mamadou had studied in either Majuro or somewhere in Marshall Islands. However, as a matter of fact, Mamadou had not studied in Marshall Islands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mamadou had studied in Majuro.

RULEBREAKER_0010473_rb

ds

cities

Lejla

she

had studied in

Honduras

Tegucigalpa

Lejla had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras.

Lejla had not studied in Honduras.

Lejla had studied in Tegucigalpa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lejla had studied in either Tegucigalpa or somewhere in Honduras. However, as a matter of fact, Lejla had not studied in Honduras. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lejla had studied in Tegucigalpa.

RULEBREAKER_0010474_rb

ds

cities

Himari

she

had studied in

Germany

Berlin

Himari had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany.

Himari had not studied in Germany.

Himari had studied in Berlin.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Himari had studied in either Berlin or somewhere in Germany. However, as a matter of fact, Himari had not studied in Germany. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Himari had studied in Berlin.

RULEBREAKER_0010475_rb

ds

cities

Beshoi

he

had studied in

Croatia

Zagreb

Beshoi had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia.

Beshoi had not studied in Croatia.

Beshoi had studied in Zagreb.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Beshoi had studied in either Zagreb or somewhere in Croatia. However, as a matter of fact, Beshoi had not studied in Croatia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Beshoi had studied in Zagreb.

RULEBREAKER_0010476_rb

ds

cities

María Fernanda

she

had studied in

Saint Lucia

Castries

María Fernanda had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia.

María Fernanda had not studied in Saint Lucia.

María Fernanda had studied in Castries.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that María Fernanda had studied in either Castries or somewhere in Saint Lucia. However, as a matter of fact, María Fernanda had not studied in Saint Lucia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

María Fernanda had studied in Castries.

RULEBREAKER_0010477_rb

ds

cities

Vasileios

he

had studied in

Afghanistan

Kabul

Vasileios had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan.

Vasileios had not studied in Afghanistan.

Vasileios had studied in Kabul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Vasileios had studied in either Kabul or somewhere in Afghanistan. However, as a matter of fact, Vasileios had not studied in Afghanistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vasileios had studied in Kabul.

RULEBREAKER_0010478_rb

ds

cities

Lydia

she

had studied in

Burundi

Gitega

Lydia had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi.

Lydia had not studied in Burundi.

Lydia had studied in Gitega.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lydia had studied in either Gitega or somewhere in Burundi. However, as a matter of fact, Lydia had not studied in Burundi. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lydia had studied in Gitega.

RULEBREAKER_0010479_rb

ds

cities

Tomás

he

had studied in

Palau

Ngerulmud

Tomás had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau.

Tomás had not studied in Palau.

Tomás had studied in Ngerulmud.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tomás had studied in either Ngerulmud or somewhere in Palau. However, as a matter of fact, Tomás had not studied in Palau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tomás had studied in Ngerulmud.

RULEBREAKER_0010480_rb

ds

cities

Amara

she

had studied in

Republic of the Congo

Brazzaville

Amara had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo.

Amara had not studied in Republic of the Congo.

Amara had studied in Brazzaville.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amara had studied in either Brazzaville or somewhere in Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Amara had not studied in Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amara had studied in Brazzaville.

RULEBREAKER_0010481_rb

ds

cities

María del Carmen

she

had studied in

Belarus

Minsk

María del Carmen had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus.

María del Carmen had not studied in Belarus.

María del Carmen had studied in Minsk.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that María del Carmen had studied in either Minsk or somewhere in Belarus. However, as a matter of fact, María del Carmen had not studied in Belarus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

María del Carmen had studied in Minsk.

RULEBREAKER_0010482_rb

ds

cities

María José

she

had studied in

Latvia

Riga

María José had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia.

María José had not studied in Latvia.

María José had studied in Riga.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that María José had studied in either Riga or somewhere in Latvia. However, as a matter of fact, María José had not studied in Latvia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

María José had studied in Riga.

RULEBREAKER_0010483_rb

ds

cities

Azra

she

had studied in

South Korea

Seoul

Azra had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea.

Azra had not studied in South Korea.

Azra had studied in Seoul.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Azra had studied in either Seoul or somewhere in South Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Azra had not studied in South Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Azra had studied in Seoul.

RULEBREAKER_0010484_rb

ds

cities

Sultan

she

had studied in

Greece

Athens

Sultan had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece.

Sultan had not studied in Greece.

Sultan had studied in Athens.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sultan had studied in either Athens or somewhere in Greece. However, as a matter of fact, Sultan had not studied in Greece. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sultan had studied in Athens.

RULEBREAKER_0010485_rb

ds

cities

Boris

he

had studied in

Uruguay

Montevideo

Boris had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay.

Boris had not studied in Uruguay.

Boris had studied in Montevideo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Boris had studied in either Montevideo or somewhere in Uruguay. However, as a matter of fact, Boris had not studied in Uruguay. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Boris had studied in Montevideo.

RULEBREAKER_0010486_rb

ds

cities

Omar

he

had studied in

Russia

Moscow

Omar had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia.

Omar had not studied in Russia.

Omar had studied in Moscow.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Omar had studied in either Moscow or somewhere in Russia. However, as a matter of fact, Omar had not studied in Russia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Omar had studied in Moscow.

RULEBREAKER_0010487_rb

ds

cities

Ioanna

she

had studied in

Eritrea

Asmara

Ioanna had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea.

Ioanna had not studied in Eritrea.

Ioanna had studied in Asmara.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ioanna had studied in either Asmara or somewhere in Eritrea. However, as a matter of fact, Ioanna had not studied in Eritrea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ioanna had studied in Asmara.

RULEBREAKER_0010488_rb

ds

cities

Kiran

he

had studied in

Maldives

Malé

Kiran had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives.

Kiran had not studied in Maldives.

Kiran had studied in Malé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kiran had studied in either Malé or somewhere in Maldives. However, as a matter of fact, Kiran had not studied in Maldives. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kiran had studied in Malé.

RULEBREAKER_0010489_rb

ds

cities

Malik

he

had studied in

Ivory Coast

Yamoussoukro

Malik had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast.

Malik had not studied in Ivory Coast.

Malik had studied in Yamoussoukro.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Malik had studied in either Yamoussoukro or somewhere in Ivory Coast. However, as a matter of fact, Malik had not studied in Ivory Coast. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Malik had studied in Yamoussoukro.

RULEBREAKER_0010490_rb

ds

cities

Evelyn

she

had studied in

Estonia

Tallinn

Evelyn had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia.

Evelyn had not studied in Estonia.

Evelyn had studied in Tallinn.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Evelyn had studied in either Tallinn or somewhere in Estonia. However, as a matter of fact, Evelyn had not studied in Estonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Evelyn had studied in Tallinn.

RULEBREAKER_0010491_rb

ds

cities

Rose-Merline

she

had studied in

Switzerland

Bern

Rose-Merline had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland.

Rose-Merline had not studied in Switzerland.

Rose-Merline had studied in Bern.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Rose-Merline had studied in either Bern or somewhere in Switzerland. However, as a matter of fact, Rose-Merline had not studied in Switzerland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Rose-Merline had studied in Bern.

RULEBREAKER_0010492_rb

ds

cities

Mattias

he

had studied in

Kingdom of Denmark

Copenhagen

Mattias had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark.

Mattias had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark.

Mattias had studied in Copenhagen.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mattias had studied in either Copenhagen or somewhere in Kingdom of Denmark. However, as a matter of fact, Mattias had not studied in Kingdom of Denmark. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mattias had studied in Copenhagen.

RULEBREAKER_0010493_rb

ds

cities

Abdulla

he

had studied in

Romania

Bucharest

Abdulla had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania.

Abdulla had not studied in Romania.

Abdulla had studied in Bucharest.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdulla had studied in either Bucharest or somewhere in Romania. However, as a matter of fact, Abdulla had not studied in Romania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Abdulla had studied in Bucharest.

RULEBREAKER_0010494_rb

ds

cities

Leano

he

had studied in

Azerbaijan

Baku

Leano had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan.

Leano had not studied in Azerbaijan.

Leano had studied in Baku.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Leano had studied in either Baku or somewhere in Azerbaijan. However, as a matter of fact, Leano had not studied in Azerbaijan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Leano had studied in Baku.

RULEBREAKER_0010495_rb

ds

cities

Maximiliano

he

had studied in

Bulgaria

Sofia

Maximiliano had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria.

Maximiliano had not studied in Bulgaria.

Maximiliano had studied in Sofia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Maximiliano had studied in either Sofia or somewhere in Bulgaria. However, as a matter of fact, Maximiliano had not studied in Bulgaria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Maximiliano had studied in Sofia.

RULEBREAKER_0010496_rb

ds

cities

Dušan

he

had studied in

Norway

Oslo

Dušan had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway.

Dušan had not studied in Norway.

Dušan had studied in Oslo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dušan had studied in either Oslo or somewhere in Norway. However, as a matter of fact, Dušan had not studied in Norway. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dušan had studied in Oslo.

RULEBREAKER_0010497_rb

ds

cities

Emily

she

had studied in

Bhutan

Thimphu

Emily had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan.

Emily had not studied in Bhutan.

Emily had studied in Thimphu.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Emily had studied in either Thimphu or somewhere in Bhutan. However, as a matter of fact, Emily had not studied in Bhutan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Emily had studied in Thimphu.

RULEBREAKER_0010498_rb

ds

cities

Lin

she

had studied in

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Basseterre

Lin had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Lin had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Lin had studied in Basseterre.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lin had studied in either Basseterre or somewhere in Saint Kitts and Nevis. However, as a matter of fact, Lin had not studied in Saint Kitts and Nevis. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lin had studied in Basseterre.

RULEBREAKER_0010499_rb

ds

cities

Laura

she

had studied in

Philippines

Manila

Laura had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines.

Laura had not studied in Philippines.

Laura had studied in Manila.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Laura had studied in either Manila or somewhere in Philippines. However, as a matter of fact, Laura had not studied in Philippines. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Laura had studied in Manila.

RULEBREAKER_0010500_rb

ds

cities

Saga

she

had studied in

Ireland

Dublin

Saga had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland.

Saga had not studied in Ireland.

Saga had studied in Dublin.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Saga had studied in either Dublin or somewhere in Ireland. However, as a matter of fact, Saga had not studied in Ireland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Saga had studied in Dublin.

RULEBREAKER_0010501_rb

ds

cities

Juan

he

had studied in

Dominican Republic

Santo Domingo

Juan had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic.

Juan had not studied in Dominican Republic.

Juan had studied in Santo Domingo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Juan had studied in either Santo Domingo or somewhere in Dominican Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Juan had not studied in Dominican Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Juan had studied in Santo Domingo.

RULEBREAKER_0010502_rb

ds

cities

Teodor

he

had studied in

Australia

Canberra

Teodor had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia.

Teodor had not studied in Australia.

Teodor had studied in Canberra.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Teodor had studied in either Canberra or somewhere in Australia. However, as a matter of fact, Teodor had not studied in Australia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Teodor had studied in Canberra.

RULEBREAKER_0010503_rb

ds

cities

Lulwa

she

had studied in

Federated States of Micronesia

Palikir

Lulwa had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia.

Lulwa had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia.

Lulwa had studied in Palikir.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Lulwa had studied in either Palikir or somewhere in Federated States of Micronesia. However, as a matter of fact, Lulwa had not studied in Federated States of Micronesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Lulwa had studied in Palikir.

RULEBREAKER_0010504_rb

ds

cities

Viktoriya

she

had studied in

Japan

Tokyo

Viktoriya had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan.

Viktoriya had not studied in Japan.

Viktoriya had studied in Tokyo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Viktoriya had studied in either Tokyo or somewhere in Japan. However, as a matter of fact, Viktoriya had not studied in Japan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Viktoriya had studied in Tokyo.

RULEBREAKER_0010505_rb

ds

cities

Ömer Asaf

he

had studied in

Myanmar

Naypyidaw

Ömer Asaf had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar.

Ömer Asaf had not studied in Myanmar.

Ömer Asaf had studied in Naypyidaw.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ömer Asaf had studied in either Naypyidaw or somewhere in Myanmar. However, as a matter of fact, Ömer Asaf had not studied in Myanmar. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ömer Asaf had studied in Naypyidaw.

RULEBREAKER_0010506_rb

ds

cities

Mersana

she

had studied in

Portugal

Lisbon

Mersana had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal.

Mersana had not studied in Portugal.

Mersana had studied in Lisbon.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mersana had studied in either Lisbon or somewhere in Portugal. However, as a matter of fact, Mersana had not studied in Portugal. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mersana had studied in Lisbon.

RULEBREAKER_0010507_rb

ds

cities

Joshua

he

had studied in

Ukraine

Kyiv

Joshua had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine.

Joshua had not studied in Ukraine.

Joshua had studied in Kyiv.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Joshua had studied in either Kyiv or somewhere in Ukraine. However, as a matter of fact, Joshua had not studied in Ukraine. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Joshua had studied in Kyiv.

RULEBREAKER_0010508_rb

ds

cities

Ji-an

she

had studied in

Rwanda

Kigali

Ji-an had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda.

Ji-an had not studied in Rwanda.

Ji-an had studied in Kigali.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ji-an had studied in either Kigali or somewhere in Rwanda. However, as a matter of fact, Ji-an had not studied in Rwanda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ji-an had studied in Kigali.

RULEBREAKER_0010509_rb

ds

cities

Ao

he

had studied in

Grenada

St. George's

Ao had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada.

Ao had not studied in Grenada.

Ao had studied in St. George's.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ao had studied in either St. George's or somewhere in Grenada. However, as a matter of fact, Ao had not studied in Grenada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ao had studied in St. George's.