jason-c/rulebreakers · Datasets at Hugging Face

id stringlengths 22 25	rulebreaker_type stringclasses 2 values	category stringclasses 9 values	firstName stringlengths 2 16	pronoun stringclasses 2 values	verb stringclasses 12 values	entityA stringclasses 191 values	entityB stringclasses 307 values	premise1 stringlengths 42 102	premise2 stringlengths 14 63	conclusion stringlengths 14 63	label bool 2 classes	kc_gen_formatted_prompt stringlengths 278 375	target_correct_conclusion stringlengths 14 62	target_incorrect_conclusion stringlengths 14 63
RULEBREAKER_0010510_rb	ds	cities	Jameson	he	had studied in	Cameroon	Yaoundé	Jameson had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon.	Jameson had not studied in Cameroon.	Jameson had studied in Yaoundé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jameson had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon. However, as a matter of fact, Jameson had not studied in Cameroon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jameson had studied in Yaoundé.
RULEBREAKER_0010511_rb	ds	cities	Susan	she	had studied in	Zambia	Lusaka	Susan had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia.	Susan had not studied in Zambia.	Susan had studied in Lusaka.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Susan had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia. However, as a matter of fact, Susan had not studied in Zambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Susan had studied in Lusaka.
RULEBREAKER_0010512_rb	ds	cities	Ema	she	had studied in	Tuvalu	Funafuti	Ema had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu.	Ema had not studied in Tuvalu.	Ema had studied in Funafuti.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ema had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu. However, as a matter of fact, Ema had not studied in Tuvalu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ema had studied in Funafuti.
RULEBREAKER_0010513_rb	ds	cities	Sō	he	had studied in	Sudan	Khartoum	Sō had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan.	Sō had not studied in Sudan.	Sō had studied in Khartoum.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sō had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Sō had not studied in Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sō had studied in Khartoum.
RULEBREAKER_0010514_rb	ds	cities	Jan	he	had studied in	South Sudan	Juba	Jan had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan.	Jan had not studied in South Sudan.	Jan had studied in Juba.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jan had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Jan had not studied in South Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jan had studied in Juba.
RULEBREAKER_0010515_rb	ds	cities	Angela	she	had studied in	Ethiopia	Addis Ababa	Angela had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia.	Angela had not studied in Ethiopia.	Angela had studied in Addis Ababa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Angela had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia. However, as a matter of fact, Angela had not studied in Ethiopia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Angela had studied in Addis Ababa.
RULEBREAKER_0010516_rb	ds	cities	Ibrahim	he	had studied in	Iceland	Reykjavík	Ibrahim had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland.	Ibrahim had not studied in Iceland.	Ibrahim had studied in Reykjavík.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ibrahim had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland. However, as a matter of fact, Ibrahim had not studied in Iceland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ibrahim had studied in Reykjavík.
RULEBREAKER_0010517_rb	ds	cities	Gita	she	had studied in	Moldova	Chișinău	Gita had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova.	Gita had not studied in Moldova.	Gita had studied in Chișinău.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gita had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova. However, as a matter of fact, Gita had not studied in Moldova. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gita had studied in Chișinău.
RULEBREAKER_0010518_rb	ds	cities	Uri	he	had studied in	São Tomé and Príncipe	São Tomé	Uri had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe.	Uri had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe.	Uri had studied in São Tomé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Uri had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe. However, as a matter of fact, Uri had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Uri had studied in São Tomé.
RULEBREAKER_0010519_rb	ds	cities	Leo	he	had studied in	Cyprus	Nicosia	Leo had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus.	Leo had not studied in Cyprus.	Leo had studied in Nicosia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Leo had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus. However, as a matter of fact, Leo had not studied in Cyprus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Leo had studied in Nicosia.
RULEBREAKER_0010520_rb	ds	cities	Milica	she	had studied in	Guyana	Georgetown	Milica had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana.	Milica had not studied in Guyana.	Milica had studied in Georgetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Milica had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana. However, as a matter of fact, Milica had not studied in Guyana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Milica had studied in Georgetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010521_rb	ds	cities	Alicja	she	had studied in	Jordan	Amman	Alicja had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan.	Alicja had not studied in Jordan.	Alicja had studied in Amman.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Alicja had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan. However, as a matter of fact, Alicja had not studied in Jordan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Alicja had studied in Amman.
RULEBREAKER_0010522_rb	ds	cities	Sebastian	he	had studied in	Andorra	Andorra la Vella	Sebastian had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra.	Sebastian had not studied in Andorra.	Sebastian had studied in Andorra la Vella.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sebastian had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra. However, as a matter of fact, Sebastian had not studied in Andorra. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sebastian had studied in Andorra la Vella.
RULEBREAKER_0010523_rb	ds	cities	Karam	he	had studied in	Serbia	Belgrade	Karam had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia.	Karam had not studied in Serbia.	Karam had studied in Belgrade.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Karam had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia. However, as a matter of fact, Karam had not studied in Serbia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Karam had studied in Belgrade.
RULEBREAKER_0010524_rb	ds	cities	Tom	he	had studied in	Bosnia and Herzegovina	Sarajevo	Tom had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina.	Tom had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina.	Tom had studied in Sarajevo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tom had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, as a matter of fact, Tom had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tom had studied in Sarajevo.
RULEBREAKER_0010525_rb	ds	cities	Bintou	she	had studied in	Kingdom of the Netherlands	Amsterdam	Bintou had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands.	Bintou had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands.	Bintou had studied in Amsterdam.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bintou had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands. However, as a matter of fact, Bintou had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bintou had studied in Amsterdam.
RULEBREAKER_0010526_rb	ds	cities	Jakov	he	had studied in	Sierra Leone	Freetown	Jakov had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone.	Jakov had not studied in Sierra Leone.	Jakov had studied in Freetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jakov had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone. However, as a matter of fact, Jakov had not studied in Sierra Leone. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jakov had studied in Freetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010527_rb	ds	cities	Niharika	she	had studied in	Colombia	Bogotá	Niharika had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia.	Niharika had not studied in Colombia.	Niharika had studied in Bogotá.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Niharika had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia. However, as a matter of fact, Niharika had not studied in Colombia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Niharika had studied in Bogotá.
RULEBREAKER_0010528_rb	ds	cities	Odval	she	had studied in	Nauru	Yaren District	Odval had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru.	Odval had not studied in Nauru.	Odval had studied in Yaren District.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Odval had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru. However, as a matter of fact, Odval had not studied in Nauru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Odval had studied in Yaren District.
RULEBREAKER_0010529_rb	ds	cities	Harry	he	had studied in	Canada	Ottawa	Harry had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada.	Harry had not studied in Canada.	Harry had studied in Ottawa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Harry had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada. However, as a matter of fact, Harry had not studied in Canada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Harry had studied in Ottawa.
RULEBREAKER_0010530_rb	ds	cities	Nouf	she	had studied in	Namibia	Windhoek	Nouf had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia.	Nouf had not studied in Namibia.	Nouf had studied in Windhoek.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nouf had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia. However, as a matter of fact, Nouf had not studied in Namibia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nouf had studied in Windhoek.
RULEBREAKER_0010531_rb	ds	cities	Žan	he	had studied in	Bahrain	Manama	Žan had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain.	Žan had not studied in Bahrain.	Žan had studied in Manama.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Žan had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain. However, as a matter of fact, Žan had not studied in Bahrain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Žan had studied in Manama.
RULEBREAKER_0010532_rb	ds	cities	Luca	he	had studied in	Seychelles	Victoria	Luca had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles.	Luca had not studied in Seychelles.	Luca had studied in Victoria.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Luca had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles. However, as a matter of fact, Luca had not studied in Seychelles. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Luca had studied in Victoria.
RULEBREAKER_0010533_rb	ds	cities	Ashraqat	she	had studied in	Syria	Damascus	Ashraqat had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria.	Ashraqat had not studied in Syria.	Ashraqat had studied in Damascus.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ashraqat had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria. However, as a matter of fact, Ashraqat had not studied in Syria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ashraqat had studied in Damascus.
RULEBREAKER_0010534_rb	ds	cities	Noa	she	had studied in	Kuwait	Kuwait City	Noa had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait.	Noa had not studied in Kuwait.	Noa had studied in Kuwait City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Noa had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait. However, as a matter of fact, Noa had not studied in Kuwait. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Noa had studied in Kuwait City.
RULEBREAKER_0010535_rb	ds	cities	Yu-jun	he	had studied in	Chad	N'Djamena	Yu-jun had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad.	Yu-jun had not studied in Chad.	Yu-jun had studied in N'Djamena.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yu-jun had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad. However, as a matter of fact, Yu-jun had not studied in Chad. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yu-jun had studied in N'Djamena.
RULEBREAKER_0010536_rb	ds	cities	Nino	he	had studied in	Slovenia	Ljubljana	Nino had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia.	Nino had not studied in Slovenia.	Nino had studied in Ljubljana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nino had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia. However, as a matter of fact, Nino had not studied in Slovenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nino had studied in Ljubljana.
RULEBREAKER_0010537_rb	ds	cities	Aarya	she	had studied in	Peru	Lima	Aarya had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru.	Aarya had not studied in Peru.	Aarya had studied in Lima.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aarya had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru. However, as a matter of fact, Aarya had not studied in Peru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aarya had studied in Lima.
RULEBREAKER_0010538_rb	ds	cities	Jákup	he	had studied in	Democratic Republic of the Congo	Kinshasa	Jákup had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo.	Jákup had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo.	Jákup had studied in Kinshasa.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Jákup had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Jákup had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Jákup had studied in Kinshasa.
RULEBREAKER_0010539_rb	ds	cities	Dragan	he	had studied in	Mexico	Mexico City	Dragan had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico.	Dragan had not studied in Mexico.	Dragan had studied in Mexico City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dragan had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico. However, as a matter of fact, Dragan had not studied in Mexico. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dragan had studied in Mexico City.
RULEBREAKER_0010540_rb	ds	cities	Yìchén	he	had studied in	Uganda	Kampala	Yìchén had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda.	Yìchén had not studied in Uganda.	Yìchén had studied in Kampala.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yìchén had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda. However, as a matter of fact, Yìchén had not studied in Uganda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yìchén had studied in Kampala.
RULEBREAKER_0010541_rb	ds	cities	Pol	he	had studied in	Togo	Lomé	Pol had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo.	Pol had not studied in Togo.	Pol had studied in Lomé.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Pol had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo. However, as a matter of fact, Pol had not studied in Togo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Pol had studied in Lomé.
RULEBREAKER_0010542_rb	ds	cities	Gunel	she	had studied in	Italy	Rome	Gunel had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy.	Gunel had not studied in Italy.	Gunel had studied in Rome.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Gunel had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy. However, as a matter of fact, Gunel had not studied in Italy. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Gunel had studied in Rome.
RULEBREAKER_0010543_rb	ds	cities	Aminata	she	had studied in	Vanuatu	Port Vila	Aminata had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu.	Aminata had not studied in Vanuatu.	Aminata had studied in Port Vila.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aminata had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu. However, as a matter of fact, Aminata had not studied in Vanuatu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aminata had studied in Port Vila.
RULEBREAKER_0010544_rb	ds	cities	Dan	he	had studied in	Turkmenistan	Ashgabat	Dan had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan.	Dan had not studied in Turkmenistan.	Dan had studied in Ashgabat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Dan had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan. However, as a matter of fact, Dan had not studied in Turkmenistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Dan had studied in Ashgabat.
RULEBREAKER_0010545_rb	ds	cities	Yǔxī	she	had studied in	Venezuela	Caracas	Yǔxī had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela.	Yǔxī had not studied in Venezuela.	Yǔxī had studied in Caracas.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yǔxī had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela. However, as a matter of fact, Yǔxī had not studied in Venezuela. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yǔxī had studied in Caracas.
RULEBREAKER_0010546_rb	ds	cities	Mario	he	had studied in	Poland	Warsaw	Mario had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland.	Mario had not studied in Poland.	Mario had studied in Warsaw.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Mario had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland. However, as a matter of fact, Mario had not studied in Poland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Mario had studied in Warsaw.
RULEBREAKER_0010547_rb	ds	cities	Francesco	he	had studied in	Montenegro	Podgorica	Francesco had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro.	Francesco had not studied in Montenegro.	Francesco had studied in Podgorica.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Francesco had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro. However, as a matter of fact, Francesco had not studied in Montenegro. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Francesco had studied in Podgorica.
RULEBREAKER_0010548_rb	ds	cities	Artur	he	had studied in	Nigeria	Abuja	Artur had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria.	Artur had not studied in Nigeria.	Artur had studied in Abuja.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Artur had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria. However, as a matter of fact, Artur had not studied in Nigeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Artur had studied in Abuja.
RULEBREAKER_0010549_rb	ds	cities	Oskar	he	had studied in	Laos	Vientiane	Oskar had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos.	Oskar had not studied in Laos.	Oskar had studied in Vientiane.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Oskar had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos. However, as a matter of fact, Oskar had not studied in Laos. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Oskar had studied in Vientiane.
RULEBREAKER_0010550_rb	ds	cities	Nivi	she	had studied in	New Zealand	Wellington	Nivi had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand.	Nivi had not studied in New Zealand.	Nivi had studied in Wellington.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nivi had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand. However, as a matter of fact, Nivi had not studied in New Zealand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nivi had studied in Wellington.
RULEBREAKER_0010551_rb	ds	cities	Marcos	he	had studied in	El Salvador	San Salvador	Marcos had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador.	Marcos had not studied in El Salvador.	Marcos had studied in San Salvador.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Marcos had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador. However, as a matter of fact, Marcos had not studied in El Salvador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Marcos had studied in San Salvador.
RULEBREAKER_0010552_rb	ds	cities	Irati	she	had studied in	Taiwan	Taipei	Irati had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan.	Irati had not studied in Taiwan.	Irati had studied in Taipei.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Irati had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan. However, as a matter of fact, Irati had not studied in Taiwan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Irati had studied in Taipei.
RULEBREAKER_0010553_rb	ds	cities	Rachid	he	had studied in	Hungary	Budapest	Rachid had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary.	Rachid had not studied in Hungary.	Rachid had studied in Budapest.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Rachid had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary. However, as a matter of fact, Rachid had not studied in Hungary. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Rachid had studied in Budapest.
RULEBREAKER_0010554_rb	ds	cities	Chia-hao	he	had studied in	Mauritius	Port Louis	Chia-hao had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius.	Chia-hao had not studied in Mauritius.	Chia-hao had studied in Port Louis.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Chia-hao had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius. However, as a matter of fact, Chia-hao had not studied in Mauritius. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Chia-hao had studied in Port Louis.
RULEBREAKER_0010555_rb	ds	cities	Klea	she	had studied in	Benin	Porto-Novo	Klea had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin.	Klea had not studied in Benin.	Klea had studied in Porto-Novo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Klea had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin. However, as a matter of fact, Klea had not studied in Benin. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Klea had studied in Porto-Novo.
RULEBREAKER_0010556_rb	ds	cities	Antonella	she	had studied in	Albania	Tirana	Antonella had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania.	Antonella had not studied in Albania.	Antonella had studied in Tirana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Antonella had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania. However, as a matter of fact, Antonella had not studied in Albania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Antonella had studied in Tirana.
RULEBREAKER_0010557_rb	ds	cities	Vusal	he	had studied in	Kenya	Nairobi	Vusal had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya.	Vusal had not studied in Kenya.	Vusal had studied in Nairobi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Vusal had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya. However, as a matter of fact, Vusal had not studied in Kenya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Vusal had studied in Nairobi.
RULEBREAKER_0010558_rb	ds	cities	Hashem	he	had studied in	Argentina	Buenos Aires	Hashem had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina.	Hashem had not studied in Argentina.	Hashem had studied in Buenos Aires.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hashem had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina. However, as a matter of fact, Hashem had not studied in Argentina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hashem had studied in Buenos Aires.
RULEBREAKER_0010559_rb	ds	cities	Sofie	she	had studied in	Vietnam	Hanoi	Sofie had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam.	Sofie had not studied in Vietnam.	Sofie had studied in Hanoi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sofie had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. However, as a matter of fact, Sofie had not studied in Vietnam. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sofie had studied in Hanoi.
RULEBREAKER_0010560_rb	ds	cities	Ginevra	she	had studied in	Malta	Valletta	Ginevra had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta.	Ginevra had not studied in Malta.	Ginevra had studied in Valletta.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ginevra had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. However, as a matter of fact, Ginevra had not studied in Malta. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ginevra had studied in Valletta.
RULEBREAKER_0010561_rb	ds	cities	Felipe	he	had studied in	Burkina Faso	Ouagadougou	Felipe had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso.	Felipe had not studied in Burkina Faso.	Felipe had studied in Ouagadougou.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Felipe had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. However, as a matter of fact, Felipe had not studied in Burkina Faso. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Felipe had studied in Ouagadougou.
RULEBREAKER_0010562_rb	ds	cities	Uta	she	had studied in	Bangladesh	Dhaka	Uta had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh.	Uta had not studied in Bangladesh.	Uta had studied in Dhaka.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Uta had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. However, as a matter of fact, Uta had not studied in Bangladesh. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Uta had studied in Dhaka.
RULEBREAKER_0010563_rb	ds	cities	Ella	she	had studied in	Gabon	Libreville	Ella had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon.	Ella had not studied in Gabon.	Ella had studied in Libreville.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ella had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. However, as a matter of fact, Ella had not studied in Gabon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ella had studied in Libreville.
RULEBREAKER_0010564_rb	ds	cities	Amaris	she	had studied in	Comoros	Moroni	Amaris had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros.	Amaris had not studied in Comoros.	Amaris had studied in Moroni.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Amaris had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. However, as a matter of fact, Amaris had not studied in Comoros. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Amaris had studied in Moroni.
RULEBREAKER_0010565_rb	ds	cities	Sakineh	she	had studied in	Panama	Panama City	Sakineh had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama.	Sakineh had not studied in Panama.	Sakineh had studied in Panama City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sakineh had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. However, as a matter of fact, Sakineh had not studied in Panama. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sakineh had studied in Panama City.
RULEBREAKER_0010566_rb	ds	cities	Kiwa	he	had studied in	Ghana	Accra	Kiwa had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana.	Kiwa had not studied in Ghana.	Kiwa had studied in Accra.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Kiwa had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. However, as a matter of fact, Kiwa had not studied in Ghana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Kiwa had studied in Accra.
RULEBREAKER_0010567_rb	ds	cities	Nia	she	had studied in	Liberia	Monrovia	Nia had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia.	Nia had not studied in Liberia.	Nia had studied in Monrovia.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nia had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. However, as a matter of fact, Nia had not studied in Liberia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nia had studied in Monrovia.
RULEBREAKER_0010568_rb	ds	cities	Relja	he	had studied in	Guinea	Conakry	Relja had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea.	Relja had not studied in Guinea.	Relja had studied in Conakry.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Relja had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Relja had not studied in Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Relja had studied in Conakry.
RULEBREAKER_0010569_rb	ds	cities	Athanasios	he	had studied in	Armenia	Yerevan	Athanasios had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia.	Athanasios had not studied in Armenia.	Athanasios had studied in Yerevan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Athanasios had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. However, as a matter of fact, Athanasios had not studied in Armenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Athanasios had studied in Yerevan.
RULEBREAKER_0010570_rb	ds	cities	Agnes	she	had studied in	Guinea-Bissau	Bissau	Agnes had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau.	Agnes had not studied in Guinea-Bissau.	Agnes had studied in Bissau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Agnes had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. However, as a matter of fact, Agnes had not studied in Guinea-Bissau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Agnes had studied in Bissau.
RULEBREAKER_0010571_rb	ds	cities	Théo	he	had studied in	North Korea	Pyongyang	Théo had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea.	Théo had not studied in North Korea.	Théo had studied in Pyongyang.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Théo had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Théo had not studied in North Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Théo had studied in Pyongyang.
RULEBREAKER_0010572_rb	ds	cities	Ralfs	he	had studied in	People's Republic of China	Beijing	Ralfs had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China.	Ralfs had not studied in People's Republic of China.	Ralfs had studied in Beijing.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ralfs had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. However, as a matter of fact, Ralfs had not studied in People's Republic of China. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ralfs had studied in Beijing.
RULEBREAKER_0010573_rb	ds	cities	Abdel-Rahman	he	had studied in	Cambodia	Phnom Penh	Abdel-Rahman had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia.	Abdel-Rahman had not studied in Cambodia.	Abdel-Rahman had studied in Phnom Penh.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdel-Rahman had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. However, as a matter of fact, Abdel-Rahman had not studied in Cambodia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Abdel-Rahman had studied in Phnom Penh.
RULEBREAKER_0010574_rb	ds	cities	Emelia	she	had studied in	Brunei	Bandar Seri Begawan	Emelia had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei.	Emelia had not studied in Brunei.	Emelia had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Emelia had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. However, as a matter of fact, Emelia had not studied in Brunei. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Emelia had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.
RULEBREAKER_0010575_rb	ds	cities	Titaina	she	had studied in	Mali	Bamako	Titaina had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali.	Titaina had not studied in Mali.	Titaina had studied in Bamako.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Titaina had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. However, as a matter of fact, Titaina had not studied in Mali. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Titaina had studied in Bamako.
RULEBREAKER_0010576_rb	ds	cities	Aiden	he	had studied in	Costa Rica	San José	Aiden had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica.	Aiden had not studied in Costa Rica.	Aiden had studied in San José.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Aiden had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. However, as a matter of fact, Aiden had not studied in Costa Rica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Aiden had studied in San José.
RULEBREAKER_0010577_rb	ds	cities	Yousef	he	had studied in	Guatemala	Guatemala City	Yousef had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala.	Yousef had not studied in Guatemala.	Yousef had studied in Guatemala City.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yousef had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. However, as a matter of fact, Yousef had not studied in Guatemala. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yousef had studied in Guatemala City.
RULEBREAKER_0010578_rb	ds	cities	Sekou	he	had studied in	United Kingdom	London	Sekou had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom.	Sekou had not studied in United Kingdom.	Sekou had studied in London.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sekou had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. However, as a matter of fact, Sekou had not studied in United Kingdom. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sekou had studied in London.
RULEBREAKER_0010579_rb	ds	cities	Joseph	he	had studied in	Haiti	Port-au-Prince	Joseph had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti.	Joseph had not studied in Haiti.	Joseph had studied in Port-au-Prince.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Joseph had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. However, as a matter of fact, Joseph had not studied in Haiti. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Joseph had studied in Port-au-Prince.
RULEBREAKER_0010580_rb	ds	cities	Ji-yoo	she	had studied in	Libya	Tripoli	Ji-yoo had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya.	Ji-yoo had not studied in Libya.	Ji-yoo had studied in Tripoli.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ji-yoo had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. However, as a matter of fact, Ji-yoo had not studied in Libya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ji-yoo had studied in Tripoli.
RULEBREAKER_0010581_rb	ds	cities	Damjan	he	had studied in	Fiji	Suva	Damjan had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji.	Damjan had not studied in Fiji.	Damjan had studied in Suva.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Damjan had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. However, as a matter of fact, Damjan had not studied in Fiji. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Damjan had studied in Suva.
RULEBREAKER_0010582_rb	ds	cities	Viktorie	she	had studied in	Georgia	Tbilisi	Viktorie had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia.	Viktorie had not studied in Georgia.	Viktorie had studied in Tbilisi.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Viktorie had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. However, as a matter of fact, Viktorie had not studied in Georgia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Viktorie had studied in Tbilisi.
RULEBREAKER_0010583_rb	ds	cities	Ji-ho	he	had studied in	Lithuania	Vilnius	Ji-ho had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania.	Ji-ho had not studied in Lithuania.	Ji-ho had studied in Vilnius.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ji-ho had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. However, as a matter of fact, Ji-ho had not studied in Lithuania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ji-ho had studied in Vilnius.
RULEBREAKER_0010584_rb	ds	cities	Luka	he	had studied in	France	Paris	Luka had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France.	Luka had not studied in France.	Luka had studied in Paris.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Luka had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France. However, as a matter of fact, Luka had not studied in France. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Luka had studied in Paris.
RULEBREAKER_0010585_rb	ds	cities	Yusuf	he	had studied in	Iraq	Baghdad	Yusuf had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq.	Yusuf had not studied in Iraq.	Yusuf had studied in Baghdad.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Yusuf had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. However, as a matter of fact, Yusuf had not studied in Iraq. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Yusuf had studied in Baghdad.
RULEBREAKER_0010586_rb	ds	cities	Hiro	he	had studied in	Dominica	Roseau	Hiro had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica.	Hiro had not studied in Dominica.	Hiro had studied in Roseau.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hiro had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. However, as a matter of fact, Hiro had not studied in Dominica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hiro had studied in Roseau.
RULEBREAKER_0010587_rb	ds	cities	Wilson	he	had studied in	Oman	Muscat	Wilson had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman.	Wilson had not studied in Oman.	Wilson had studied in Muscat.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Wilson had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. However, as a matter of fact, Wilson had not studied in Oman. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Wilson had studied in Muscat.
RULEBREAKER_0010588_rb	ds	cities	Bolormaa	she	had studied in	Thailand	Bangkok	Bolormaa had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand.	Bolormaa had not studied in Thailand.	Bolormaa had studied in Bangkok.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Bolormaa had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. However, as a matter of fact, Bolormaa had not studied in Thailand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Bolormaa had studied in Bangkok.
RULEBREAKER_0010589_rb	ds	cities	Tapuarii	he	had studied in	Slovakia	Bratislava	Tapuarii had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia.	Tapuarii had not studied in Slovakia.	Tapuarii had studied in Bratislava.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Tapuarii had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. However, as a matter of fact, Tapuarii had not studied in Slovakia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Tapuarii had studied in Bratislava.
RULEBREAKER_0010590_rb	ds	cities	Fatemeh	she	had studied in	Czech Republic	Prague	Fatemeh had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic.	Fatemeh had not studied in Czech Republic.	Fatemeh had studied in Prague.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Fatemeh had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Fatemeh had not studied in Czech Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Fatemeh had studied in Prague.
RULEBREAKER_0010591_rb	ds	cities	Andrias	he	had studied in	Spain	Madrid	Andrias had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain.	Andrias had not studied in Spain.	Andrias had studied in Madrid.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Andrias had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. However, as a matter of fact, Andrias had not studied in Spain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Andrias had studied in Madrid.
RULEBREAKER_0010592_rb	ds	cities	Iker	he	had studied in	Austria	Vienna	Iker had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria.	Iker had not studied in Austria.	Iker had studied in Vienna.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Iker had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. However, as a matter of fact, Iker had not studied in Austria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Iker had studied in Vienna.
RULEBREAKER_0010593_rb	ds	cities	Sevda	she	had studied in	Indonesia	Jakarta	Sevda had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia.	Sevda had not studied in Indonesia.	Sevda had studied in Jakarta.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Sevda had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. However, as a matter of fact, Sevda had not studied in Indonesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Sevda had studied in Jakarta.
RULEBREAKER_0010594_rb	ds	cities	Leordo	he	had studied in	Pakistan	Islamabad	Leordo had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan.	Leordo had not studied in Pakistan.	Leordo had studied in Islamabad.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Leordo had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. However, as a matter of fact, Leordo had not studied in Pakistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Leordo had studied in Islamabad.
RULEBREAKER_0010595_rb	ds	cities	Ayzere	she	had studied in	Brazil	Brasília	Ayzere had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil.	Ayzere had not studied in Brazil.	Ayzere had studied in Brasília.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayzere had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. However, as a matter of fact, Ayzere had not studied in Brazil. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ayzere had studied in Brasília.
RULEBREAKER_0010596_rb	ds	cities	Wateen	she	had studied in	Belgium	City of Brussels	Wateen had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium.	Wateen had not studied in Belgium.	Wateen had studied in City of Brussels.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Wateen had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. However, as a matter of fact, Wateen had not studied in Belgium. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Wateen had studied in City of Brussels.
RULEBREAKER_0010597_rb	ds	cities	Hüseyin	he	had studied in	Tajikistan	Dushanbe	Hüseyin had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan.	Hüseyin had not studied in Tajikistan.	Hüseyin had studied in Dushanbe.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Hüseyin had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. However, as a matter of fact, Hüseyin had not studied in Tajikistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Hüseyin had studied in Dushanbe.
RULEBREAKER_0010598_rb	ds	cities	Artem	he	had studied in	North Macedonia	Skopje	Artem had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia.	Artem had not studied in North Macedonia.	Artem had studied in Skopje.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Artem had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. However, as a matter of fact, Artem had not studied in North Macedonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Artem had studied in Skopje.
RULEBREAKER_0010599_rb	ds	cities	Oihan	he	had studied in	Mozambique	Maputo	Oihan had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique.	Oihan had not studied in Mozambique.	Oihan had studied in Maputo.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Oihan had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. However, as a matter of fact, Oihan had not studied in Mozambique. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Oihan had studied in Maputo.
RULEBREAKER_0010600_rb	ds	cities	Ethan	he	had studied in	Nicaragua	Managua	Ethan had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua.	Ethan had not studied in Nicaragua.	Ethan had studied in Managua.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ethan had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. However, as a matter of fact, Ethan had not studied in Nicaragua. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ethan had studied in Managua.
RULEBREAKER_0010601_rb	ds	cities	Ömer	he	had studied in	Cuba	Havana	Ömer had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba.	Ömer had not studied in Cuba.	Ömer had studied in Havana.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ömer had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. However, as a matter of fact, Ömer had not studied in Cuba. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ömer had studied in Havana.
RULEBREAKER_0010602_rb	ds	cities	Noor	she	had studied in	Angola	Luanda	Noor had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola.	Noor had not studied in Angola.	Noor had studied in Luanda.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Noor had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. However, as a matter of fact, Noor had not studied in Angola. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Noor had studied in Luanda.
RULEBREAKER_0010603_rb	ds	cities	Ida	she	had studied in	Mauritania	Nouakchott	Ida had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania.	Ida had not studied in Mauritania.	Ida had studied in Nouakchott.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ida had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. However, as a matter of fact, Ida had not studied in Mauritania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ida had studied in Nouakchott.
RULEBREAKER_0010604_rb	ds	cities	Niviaq	she	had studied in	Barbados	Bridgetown	Niviaq had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados.	Niviaq had not studied in Barbados.	Niviaq had studied in Bridgetown.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Niviaq had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. However, as a matter of fact, Niviaq had not studied in Barbados. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Niviaq had studied in Bridgetown.
RULEBREAKER_0010605_rb	ds	cities	Ibai	he	had studied in	Sweden	Stockholm	Ibai had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden.	Ibai had not studied in Sweden.	Ibai had studied in Stockholm.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ibai had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. However, as a matter of fact, Ibai had not studied in Sweden. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ibai had studied in Stockholm.
RULEBREAKER_0010606_rb	ds	cities	Nelio	he	had studied in	Jamaica	Kingston	Nelio had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica.	Nelio had not studied in Jamaica.	Nelio had studied in Kingston.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Nelio had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. However, as a matter of fact, Nelio had not studied in Jamaica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Nelio had studied in Kingston.
RULEBREAKER_0010607_rb	ds	cities	Ha-rin	she	had studied in	Mongolia	Ulaanbaatar	Ha-rin had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia.	Ha-rin had not studied in Mongolia.	Ha-rin had studied in Ulaanbaatar.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Ha-rin had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. However, as a matter of fact, Ha-rin had not studied in Mongolia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Ha-rin had studied in Ulaanbaatar.
RULEBREAKER_0010608_rb	ds	cities	Celeste	she	had studied in	United States of America	Washington, D.C.	Celeste had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America.	Celeste had not studied in United States of America.	Celeste had studied in Washington, D.C..	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Celeste had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. However, as a matter of fact, Celeste had not studied in United States of America. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Celeste had studied in Washington, D.C..
RULEBREAKER_0010609_rb	ds	cities	Layla	she	had studied in	Zimbabwe	Harare	Layla had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe.	Layla had not studied in Zimbabwe.	Layla had studied in Harare.	false	Premises: Suppose we are told that Layla had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe. However, as a matter of fact, Layla had not studied in Zimbabwe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.	Nothing follows	Layla had studied in Harare.

RULEBREAKER_0010510_rb

ds

cities

Jameson

he

had studied in

Cameroon

Yaoundé

Jameson had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon.

Jameson had not studied in Cameroon.

Jameson had studied in Yaoundé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jameson had studied in either Yaoundé or somewhere in Cameroon. However, as a matter of fact, Jameson had not studied in Cameroon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jameson had studied in Yaoundé.

RULEBREAKER_0010511_rb

ds

cities

Susan

she

had studied in

Zambia

Lusaka

Susan had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia.

Susan had not studied in Zambia.

Susan had studied in Lusaka.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Susan had studied in either Lusaka or somewhere in Zambia. However, as a matter of fact, Susan had not studied in Zambia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Susan had studied in Lusaka.

RULEBREAKER_0010512_rb

ds

cities

Ema

she

had studied in

Tuvalu

Funafuti

Ema had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu.

Ema had not studied in Tuvalu.

Ema had studied in Funafuti.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ema had studied in either Funafuti or somewhere in Tuvalu. However, as a matter of fact, Ema had not studied in Tuvalu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ema had studied in Funafuti.

RULEBREAKER_0010513_rb

ds

cities

Sō

he

had studied in

Sudan

Khartoum

Sō had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan.

Sō had not studied in Sudan.

Sō had studied in Khartoum.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sō had studied in either Khartoum or somewhere in Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Sō had not studied in Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sō had studied in Khartoum.

RULEBREAKER_0010514_rb

ds

cities

Jan

he

had studied in

South Sudan

Juba

Jan had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan.

Jan had not studied in South Sudan.

Jan had studied in Juba.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jan had studied in either Juba or somewhere in South Sudan. However, as a matter of fact, Jan had not studied in South Sudan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jan had studied in Juba.

RULEBREAKER_0010515_rb

ds

cities

Angela

she

had studied in

Ethiopia

Addis Ababa

Angela had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia.

Angela had not studied in Ethiopia.

Angela had studied in Addis Ababa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Angela had studied in either Addis Ababa or somewhere in Ethiopia. However, as a matter of fact, Angela had not studied in Ethiopia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Angela had studied in Addis Ababa.

RULEBREAKER_0010516_rb

ds

cities

Ibrahim

he

had studied in

Iceland

Reykjavík

Ibrahim had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland.

Ibrahim had not studied in Iceland.

Ibrahim had studied in Reykjavík.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ibrahim had studied in either Reykjavík or somewhere in Iceland. However, as a matter of fact, Ibrahim had not studied in Iceland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ibrahim had studied in Reykjavík.

RULEBREAKER_0010517_rb

ds

cities

Gita

she

had studied in

Moldova

Chișinău

Gita had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova.

Gita had not studied in Moldova.

Gita had studied in Chișinău.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gita had studied in either Chișinău or somewhere in Moldova. However, as a matter of fact, Gita had not studied in Moldova. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gita had studied in Chișinău.

RULEBREAKER_0010518_rb

ds

cities

Uri

he

had studied in

São Tomé and Príncipe

São Tomé

Uri had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe.

Uri had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe.

Uri had studied in São Tomé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Uri had studied in either São Tomé or somewhere in São Tomé and Príncipe. However, as a matter of fact, Uri had not studied in São Tomé and Príncipe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Uri had studied in São Tomé.

RULEBREAKER_0010519_rb

ds

cities

Leo

he

had studied in

Cyprus

Nicosia

Leo had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus.

Leo had not studied in Cyprus.

Leo had studied in Nicosia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Leo had studied in either Nicosia or somewhere in Cyprus. However, as a matter of fact, Leo had not studied in Cyprus. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Leo had studied in Nicosia.

RULEBREAKER_0010520_rb

ds

cities

Milica

she

had studied in

Guyana

Georgetown

Milica had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana.

Milica had not studied in Guyana.

Milica had studied in Georgetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Milica had studied in either Georgetown or somewhere in Guyana. However, as a matter of fact, Milica had not studied in Guyana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Milica had studied in Georgetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010521_rb

ds

cities

Alicja

she

had studied in

Jordan

Amman

Alicja had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan.

Alicja had not studied in Jordan.

Alicja had studied in Amman.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Alicja had studied in either Amman or somewhere in Jordan. However, as a matter of fact, Alicja had not studied in Jordan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Alicja had studied in Amman.

RULEBREAKER_0010522_rb

ds

cities

Sebastian

he

had studied in

Andorra

Andorra la Vella

Sebastian had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra.

Sebastian had not studied in Andorra.

Sebastian had studied in Andorra la Vella.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sebastian had studied in either Andorra la Vella or somewhere in Andorra. However, as a matter of fact, Sebastian had not studied in Andorra. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sebastian had studied in Andorra la Vella.

RULEBREAKER_0010523_rb

ds

cities

Karam

he

had studied in

Serbia

Belgrade

Karam had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia.

Karam had not studied in Serbia.

Karam had studied in Belgrade.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Karam had studied in either Belgrade or somewhere in Serbia. However, as a matter of fact, Karam had not studied in Serbia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Karam had studied in Belgrade.

RULEBREAKER_0010524_rb

ds

cities

Tom

he

had studied in

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Sarajevo

Tom had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Tom had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Tom had studied in Sarajevo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tom had studied in either Sarajevo or somewhere in Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, as a matter of fact, Tom had not studied in Bosnia and Herzegovina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tom had studied in Sarajevo.

RULEBREAKER_0010525_rb

ds

cities

Bintou

she

had studied in

Kingdom of the Netherlands

Amsterdam

Bintou had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Bintou had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands.

Bintou had studied in Amsterdam.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bintou had studied in either Amsterdam or somewhere in Kingdom of the Netherlands. However, as a matter of fact, Bintou had not studied in Kingdom of the Netherlands. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bintou had studied in Amsterdam.

RULEBREAKER_0010526_rb

ds

cities

Jakov

he

had studied in

Sierra Leone

Freetown

Jakov had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone.

Jakov had not studied in Sierra Leone.

Jakov had studied in Freetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jakov had studied in either Freetown or somewhere in Sierra Leone. However, as a matter of fact, Jakov had not studied in Sierra Leone. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jakov had studied in Freetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010527_rb

ds

cities

Niharika

she

had studied in

Colombia

Bogotá

Niharika had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia.

Niharika had not studied in Colombia.

Niharika had studied in Bogotá.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Niharika had studied in either Bogotá or somewhere in Colombia. However, as a matter of fact, Niharika had not studied in Colombia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Niharika had studied in Bogotá.

RULEBREAKER_0010528_rb

ds

cities

Odval

she

had studied in

Nauru

Yaren District

Odval had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru.

Odval had not studied in Nauru.

Odval had studied in Yaren District.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Odval had studied in either Yaren District or somewhere in Nauru. However, as a matter of fact, Odval had not studied in Nauru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Odval had studied in Yaren District.

RULEBREAKER_0010529_rb

ds

cities

Harry

he

had studied in

Canada

Ottawa

Harry had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada.

Harry had not studied in Canada.

Harry had studied in Ottawa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Harry had studied in either Ottawa or somewhere in Canada. However, as a matter of fact, Harry had not studied in Canada. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Harry had studied in Ottawa.

RULEBREAKER_0010530_rb

ds

cities

Nouf

she

had studied in

Namibia

Windhoek

Nouf had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia.

Nouf had not studied in Namibia.

Nouf had studied in Windhoek.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nouf had studied in either Windhoek or somewhere in Namibia. However, as a matter of fact, Nouf had not studied in Namibia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nouf had studied in Windhoek.

RULEBREAKER_0010531_rb

ds

cities

Žan

he

had studied in

Bahrain

Manama

Žan had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain.

Žan had not studied in Bahrain.

Žan had studied in Manama.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Žan had studied in either Manama or somewhere in Bahrain. However, as a matter of fact, Žan had not studied in Bahrain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Žan had studied in Manama.

RULEBREAKER_0010532_rb

ds

cities

Luca

he

had studied in

Seychelles

Victoria

Luca had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles.

Luca had not studied in Seychelles.

Luca had studied in Victoria.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Luca had studied in either Victoria or somewhere in Seychelles. However, as a matter of fact, Luca had not studied in Seychelles. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Luca had studied in Victoria.

RULEBREAKER_0010533_rb

ds

cities

Ashraqat

she

had studied in

Syria

Damascus

Ashraqat had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria.

Ashraqat had not studied in Syria.

Ashraqat had studied in Damascus.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ashraqat had studied in either Damascus or somewhere in Syria. However, as a matter of fact, Ashraqat had not studied in Syria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ashraqat had studied in Damascus.

RULEBREAKER_0010534_rb

ds

cities

Noa

she

had studied in

Kuwait

Kuwait City

Noa had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait.

Noa had not studied in Kuwait.

Noa had studied in Kuwait City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Noa had studied in either Kuwait City or somewhere in Kuwait. However, as a matter of fact, Noa had not studied in Kuwait. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Noa had studied in Kuwait City.

RULEBREAKER_0010535_rb

ds

cities

Yu-jun

he

had studied in

Chad

N'Djamena

Yu-jun had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad.

Yu-jun had not studied in Chad.

Yu-jun had studied in N'Djamena.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yu-jun had studied in either N'Djamena or somewhere in Chad. However, as a matter of fact, Yu-jun had not studied in Chad. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yu-jun had studied in N'Djamena.

RULEBREAKER_0010536_rb

ds

cities

Nino

he

had studied in

Slovenia

Ljubljana

Nino had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia.

Nino had not studied in Slovenia.

Nino had studied in Ljubljana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nino had studied in either Ljubljana or somewhere in Slovenia. However, as a matter of fact, Nino had not studied in Slovenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nino had studied in Ljubljana.

RULEBREAKER_0010537_rb

ds

cities

Aarya

she

had studied in

Peru

Lima

Aarya had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru.

Aarya had not studied in Peru.

Aarya had studied in Lima.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aarya had studied in either Lima or somewhere in Peru. However, as a matter of fact, Aarya had not studied in Peru. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aarya had studied in Lima.

RULEBREAKER_0010538_rb

ds

cities

Jákup

he

had studied in

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Kinshasa

Jákup had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Jákup had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Jákup had studied in Kinshasa.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Jákup had studied in either Kinshasa or somewhere in Democratic Republic of the Congo. However, as a matter of fact, Jákup had not studied in Democratic Republic of the Congo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Jákup had studied in Kinshasa.

RULEBREAKER_0010539_rb

ds

cities

Dragan

he

had studied in

Mexico

Mexico City

Dragan had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico.

Dragan had not studied in Mexico.

Dragan had studied in Mexico City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dragan had studied in either Mexico City or somewhere in Mexico. However, as a matter of fact, Dragan had not studied in Mexico. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dragan had studied in Mexico City.

RULEBREAKER_0010540_rb

ds

cities

Yìchén

he

had studied in

Uganda

Kampala

Yìchén had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda.

Yìchén had not studied in Uganda.

Yìchén had studied in Kampala.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yìchén had studied in either Kampala or somewhere in Uganda. However, as a matter of fact, Yìchén had not studied in Uganda. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yìchén had studied in Kampala.

RULEBREAKER_0010541_rb

ds

cities

Pol

he

had studied in

Togo

Lomé

Pol had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo.

Pol had not studied in Togo.

Pol had studied in Lomé.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Pol had studied in either Lomé or somewhere in Togo. However, as a matter of fact, Pol had not studied in Togo. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Pol had studied in Lomé.

RULEBREAKER_0010542_rb

ds

cities

Gunel

she

had studied in

Italy

Rome

Gunel had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy.

Gunel had not studied in Italy.

Gunel had studied in Rome.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Gunel had studied in either Rome or somewhere in Italy. However, as a matter of fact, Gunel had not studied in Italy. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Gunel had studied in Rome.

RULEBREAKER_0010543_rb

ds

cities

Aminata

she

had studied in

Vanuatu

Port Vila

Aminata had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu.

Aminata had not studied in Vanuatu.

Aminata had studied in Port Vila.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aminata had studied in either Port Vila or somewhere in Vanuatu. However, as a matter of fact, Aminata had not studied in Vanuatu. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aminata had studied in Port Vila.

RULEBREAKER_0010544_rb

ds

cities

Dan

he

had studied in

Turkmenistan

Ashgabat

Dan had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan.

Dan had not studied in Turkmenistan.

Dan had studied in Ashgabat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Dan had studied in either Ashgabat or somewhere in Turkmenistan. However, as a matter of fact, Dan had not studied in Turkmenistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Dan had studied in Ashgabat.

RULEBREAKER_0010545_rb

ds

cities

Yǔxī

she

had studied in

Venezuela

Caracas

Yǔxī had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela.

Yǔxī had not studied in Venezuela.

Yǔxī had studied in Caracas.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yǔxī had studied in either Caracas or somewhere in Venezuela. However, as a matter of fact, Yǔxī had not studied in Venezuela. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yǔxī had studied in Caracas.

RULEBREAKER_0010546_rb

ds

cities

Mario

he

had studied in

Poland

Warsaw

Mario had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland.

Mario had not studied in Poland.

Mario had studied in Warsaw.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Mario had studied in either Warsaw or somewhere in Poland. However, as a matter of fact, Mario had not studied in Poland. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Mario had studied in Warsaw.

RULEBREAKER_0010547_rb

ds

cities

Francesco

he

had studied in

Montenegro

Podgorica

Francesco had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro.

Francesco had not studied in Montenegro.

Francesco had studied in Podgorica.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Francesco had studied in either Podgorica or somewhere in Montenegro. However, as a matter of fact, Francesco had not studied in Montenegro. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Francesco had studied in Podgorica.

RULEBREAKER_0010548_rb

ds

cities

Artur

he

had studied in

Nigeria

Abuja

Artur had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria.

Artur had not studied in Nigeria.

Artur had studied in Abuja.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Artur had studied in either Abuja or somewhere in Nigeria. However, as a matter of fact, Artur had not studied in Nigeria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Artur had studied in Abuja.

RULEBREAKER_0010549_rb

ds

cities

Oskar

he

had studied in

Laos

Vientiane

Oskar had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos.

Oskar had not studied in Laos.

Oskar had studied in Vientiane.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Oskar had studied in either Vientiane or somewhere in Laos. However, as a matter of fact, Oskar had not studied in Laos. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Oskar had studied in Vientiane.

RULEBREAKER_0010550_rb

ds

cities

Nivi

she

had studied in

New Zealand

Wellington

Nivi had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand.

Nivi had not studied in New Zealand.

Nivi had studied in Wellington.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nivi had studied in either Wellington or somewhere in New Zealand. However, as a matter of fact, Nivi had not studied in New Zealand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nivi had studied in Wellington.

RULEBREAKER_0010551_rb

ds

cities

Marcos

he

had studied in

El Salvador

San Salvador

Marcos had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador.

Marcos had not studied in El Salvador.

Marcos had studied in San Salvador.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Marcos had studied in either San Salvador or somewhere in El Salvador. However, as a matter of fact, Marcos had not studied in El Salvador. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Marcos had studied in San Salvador.

RULEBREAKER_0010552_rb

ds

cities

Irati

she

had studied in

Taiwan

Taipei

Irati had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan.

Irati had not studied in Taiwan.

Irati had studied in Taipei.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Irati had studied in either Taipei or somewhere in Taiwan. However, as a matter of fact, Irati had not studied in Taiwan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Irati had studied in Taipei.

RULEBREAKER_0010553_rb

ds

cities

Rachid

he

had studied in

Hungary

Budapest

Rachid had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary.

Rachid had not studied in Hungary.

Rachid had studied in Budapest.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Rachid had studied in either Budapest or somewhere in Hungary. However, as a matter of fact, Rachid had not studied in Hungary. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Rachid had studied in Budapest.

RULEBREAKER_0010554_rb

ds

cities

Chia-hao

he

had studied in

Mauritius

Port Louis

Chia-hao had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius.

Chia-hao had not studied in Mauritius.

Chia-hao had studied in Port Louis.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Chia-hao had studied in either Port Louis or somewhere in Mauritius. However, as a matter of fact, Chia-hao had not studied in Mauritius. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Chia-hao had studied in Port Louis.

RULEBREAKER_0010555_rb

ds

cities

Klea

she

had studied in

Benin

Porto-Novo

Klea had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin.

Klea had not studied in Benin.

Klea had studied in Porto-Novo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Klea had studied in either Porto-Novo or somewhere in Benin. However, as a matter of fact, Klea had not studied in Benin. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Klea had studied in Porto-Novo.

RULEBREAKER_0010556_rb

ds

cities

Antonella

she

had studied in

Albania

Tirana

Antonella had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania.

Antonella had not studied in Albania.

Antonella had studied in Tirana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Antonella had studied in either Tirana or somewhere in Albania. However, as a matter of fact, Antonella had not studied in Albania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Antonella had studied in Tirana.

RULEBREAKER_0010557_rb

ds

cities

Vusal

he

had studied in

Kenya

Nairobi

Vusal had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya.

Vusal had not studied in Kenya.

Vusal had studied in Nairobi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Vusal had studied in either Nairobi or somewhere in Kenya. However, as a matter of fact, Vusal had not studied in Kenya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Vusal had studied in Nairobi.

RULEBREAKER_0010558_rb

ds

cities

Hashem

he

had studied in

Argentina

Buenos Aires

Hashem had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina.

Hashem had not studied in Argentina.

Hashem had studied in Buenos Aires.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hashem had studied in either Buenos Aires or somewhere in Argentina. However, as a matter of fact, Hashem had not studied in Argentina. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hashem had studied in Buenos Aires.

RULEBREAKER_0010559_rb

ds

cities

Sofie

she

had studied in

Vietnam

Hanoi

Sofie had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam.

Sofie had not studied in Vietnam.

Sofie had studied in Hanoi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sofie had studied in either Hanoi or somewhere in Vietnam. However, as a matter of fact, Sofie had not studied in Vietnam. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sofie had studied in Hanoi.

RULEBREAKER_0010560_rb

ds

cities

Ginevra

she

had studied in

Malta

Valletta

Ginevra had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta.

Ginevra had not studied in Malta.

Ginevra had studied in Valletta.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ginevra had studied in either Valletta or somewhere in Malta. However, as a matter of fact, Ginevra had not studied in Malta. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ginevra had studied in Valletta.

RULEBREAKER_0010561_rb

ds

cities

Felipe

he

had studied in

Burkina Faso

Ouagadougou

Felipe had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso.

Felipe had not studied in Burkina Faso.

Felipe had studied in Ouagadougou.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Felipe had studied in either Ouagadougou or somewhere in Burkina Faso. However, as a matter of fact, Felipe had not studied in Burkina Faso. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Felipe had studied in Ouagadougou.

RULEBREAKER_0010562_rb

ds

cities

Uta

she

had studied in

Bangladesh

Dhaka

Uta had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh.

Uta had not studied in Bangladesh.

Uta had studied in Dhaka.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Uta had studied in either Dhaka or somewhere in Bangladesh. However, as a matter of fact, Uta had not studied in Bangladesh. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Uta had studied in Dhaka.

RULEBREAKER_0010563_rb

ds

cities

Ella

she

had studied in

Gabon

Libreville

Ella had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon.

Ella had not studied in Gabon.

Ella had studied in Libreville.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ella had studied in either Libreville or somewhere in Gabon. However, as a matter of fact, Ella had not studied in Gabon. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ella had studied in Libreville.

RULEBREAKER_0010564_rb

ds

cities

Amaris

she

had studied in

Comoros

Moroni

Amaris had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros.

Amaris had not studied in Comoros.

Amaris had studied in Moroni.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Amaris had studied in either Moroni or somewhere in Comoros. However, as a matter of fact, Amaris had not studied in Comoros. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Amaris had studied in Moroni.

RULEBREAKER_0010565_rb

ds

cities

Sakineh

she

had studied in

Panama

Panama City

Sakineh had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama.

Sakineh had not studied in Panama.

Sakineh had studied in Panama City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sakineh had studied in either Panama City or somewhere in Panama. However, as a matter of fact, Sakineh had not studied in Panama. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sakineh had studied in Panama City.

RULEBREAKER_0010566_rb

ds

cities

Kiwa

he

had studied in

Ghana

Accra

Kiwa had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana.

Kiwa had not studied in Ghana.

Kiwa had studied in Accra.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Kiwa had studied in either Accra or somewhere in Ghana. However, as a matter of fact, Kiwa had not studied in Ghana. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Kiwa had studied in Accra.

RULEBREAKER_0010567_rb

ds

cities

Nia

she

had studied in

Liberia

Monrovia

Nia had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia.

Nia had not studied in Liberia.

Nia had studied in Monrovia.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nia had studied in either Monrovia or somewhere in Liberia. However, as a matter of fact, Nia had not studied in Liberia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nia had studied in Monrovia.

RULEBREAKER_0010568_rb

ds

cities

Relja

he

had studied in

Guinea

Conakry

Relja had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea.

Relja had not studied in Guinea.

Relja had studied in Conakry.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Relja had studied in either Conakry or somewhere in Guinea. However, as a matter of fact, Relja had not studied in Guinea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Relja had studied in Conakry.

RULEBREAKER_0010569_rb

ds

cities

Athanasios

he

had studied in

Armenia

Yerevan

Athanasios had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia.

Athanasios had not studied in Armenia.

Athanasios had studied in Yerevan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Athanasios had studied in either Yerevan or somewhere in Armenia. However, as a matter of fact, Athanasios had not studied in Armenia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Athanasios had studied in Yerevan.

RULEBREAKER_0010570_rb

ds

cities

Agnes

she

had studied in

Guinea-Bissau

Bissau

Agnes had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau.

Agnes had not studied in Guinea-Bissau.

Agnes had studied in Bissau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Agnes had studied in either Bissau or somewhere in Guinea-Bissau. However, as a matter of fact, Agnes had not studied in Guinea-Bissau. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Agnes had studied in Bissau.

RULEBREAKER_0010571_rb

ds

cities

Théo

he

had studied in

North Korea

Pyongyang

Théo had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea.

Théo had not studied in North Korea.

Théo had studied in Pyongyang.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Théo had studied in either Pyongyang or somewhere in North Korea. However, as a matter of fact, Théo had not studied in North Korea. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Théo had studied in Pyongyang.

RULEBREAKER_0010572_rb

ds

cities

Ralfs

he

had studied in

People's Republic of China

Beijing

Ralfs had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China.

Ralfs had not studied in People's Republic of China.

Ralfs had studied in Beijing.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ralfs had studied in either Beijing or somewhere in People's Republic of China. However, as a matter of fact, Ralfs had not studied in People's Republic of China. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ralfs had studied in Beijing.

RULEBREAKER_0010573_rb

ds

cities

Abdel-Rahman

he

had studied in

Cambodia

Phnom Penh

Abdel-Rahman had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia.

Abdel-Rahman had not studied in Cambodia.

Abdel-Rahman had studied in Phnom Penh.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Abdel-Rahman had studied in either Phnom Penh or somewhere in Cambodia. However, as a matter of fact, Abdel-Rahman had not studied in Cambodia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Abdel-Rahman had studied in Phnom Penh.

RULEBREAKER_0010574_rb

ds

cities

Emelia

she

had studied in

Brunei

Bandar Seri Begawan

Emelia had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei.

Emelia had not studied in Brunei.

Emelia had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Emelia had studied in either Bandar Seri Begawan or somewhere in Brunei. However, as a matter of fact, Emelia had not studied in Brunei. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Emelia had studied in Bandar Seri Begawan.

RULEBREAKER_0010575_rb

ds

cities

Titaina

she

had studied in

Mali

Bamako

Titaina had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali.

Titaina had not studied in Mali.

Titaina had studied in Bamako.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Titaina had studied in either Bamako or somewhere in Mali. However, as a matter of fact, Titaina had not studied in Mali. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Titaina had studied in Bamako.

RULEBREAKER_0010576_rb

ds

cities

Aiden

he

had studied in

Costa Rica

San José

Aiden had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica.

Aiden had not studied in Costa Rica.

Aiden had studied in San José.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Aiden had studied in either San José or somewhere in Costa Rica. However, as a matter of fact, Aiden had not studied in Costa Rica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Aiden had studied in San José.

RULEBREAKER_0010577_rb

ds

cities

Yousef

he

had studied in

Guatemala

Guatemala City

Yousef had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala.

Yousef had not studied in Guatemala.

Yousef had studied in Guatemala City.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yousef had studied in either Guatemala City or somewhere in Guatemala. However, as a matter of fact, Yousef had not studied in Guatemala. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yousef had studied in Guatemala City.

RULEBREAKER_0010578_rb

ds

cities

Sekou

he

had studied in

United Kingdom

London

Sekou had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom.

Sekou had not studied in United Kingdom.

Sekou had studied in London.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sekou had studied in either London or somewhere in United Kingdom. However, as a matter of fact, Sekou had not studied in United Kingdom. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sekou had studied in London.

RULEBREAKER_0010579_rb

ds

cities

Joseph

he

had studied in

Haiti

Port-au-Prince

Joseph had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti.

Joseph had not studied in Haiti.

Joseph had studied in Port-au-Prince.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Joseph had studied in either Port-au-Prince or somewhere in Haiti. However, as a matter of fact, Joseph had not studied in Haiti. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Joseph had studied in Port-au-Prince.

RULEBREAKER_0010580_rb

ds

cities

Ji-yoo

she

had studied in

Libya

Tripoli

Ji-yoo had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya.

Ji-yoo had not studied in Libya.

Ji-yoo had studied in Tripoli.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ji-yoo had studied in either Tripoli or somewhere in Libya. However, as a matter of fact, Ji-yoo had not studied in Libya. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ji-yoo had studied in Tripoli.

RULEBREAKER_0010581_rb

ds

cities

Damjan

he

had studied in

Fiji

Suva

Damjan had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji.

Damjan had not studied in Fiji.

Damjan had studied in Suva.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Damjan had studied in either Suva or somewhere in Fiji. However, as a matter of fact, Damjan had not studied in Fiji. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Damjan had studied in Suva.

RULEBREAKER_0010582_rb

ds

cities

Viktorie

she

had studied in

Georgia

Tbilisi

Viktorie had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia.

Viktorie had not studied in Georgia.

Viktorie had studied in Tbilisi.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Viktorie had studied in either Tbilisi or somewhere in Georgia. However, as a matter of fact, Viktorie had not studied in Georgia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Viktorie had studied in Tbilisi.

RULEBREAKER_0010583_rb

ds

cities

Ji-ho

he

had studied in

Lithuania

Vilnius

Ji-ho had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania.

Ji-ho had not studied in Lithuania.

Ji-ho had studied in Vilnius.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ji-ho had studied in either Vilnius or somewhere in Lithuania. However, as a matter of fact, Ji-ho had not studied in Lithuania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ji-ho had studied in Vilnius.

RULEBREAKER_0010584_rb

ds

cities

Luka

he

had studied in

France

Paris

Luka had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France.

Luka had not studied in France.

Luka had studied in Paris.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Luka had studied in either Paris or somewhere in France. However, as a matter of fact, Luka had not studied in France. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Luka had studied in Paris.

RULEBREAKER_0010585_rb

ds

cities

Yusuf

he

had studied in

Iraq

Baghdad

Yusuf had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq.

Yusuf had not studied in Iraq.

Yusuf had studied in Baghdad.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Yusuf had studied in either Baghdad or somewhere in Iraq. However, as a matter of fact, Yusuf had not studied in Iraq. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Yusuf had studied in Baghdad.

RULEBREAKER_0010586_rb

ds

cities

Hiro

he

had studied in

Dominica

Roseau

Hiro had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica.

Hiro had not studied in Dominica.

Hiro had studied in Roseau.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hiro had studied in either Roseau or somewhere in Dominica. However, as a matter of fact, Hiro had not studied in Dominica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hiro had studied in Roseau.

RULEBREAKER_0010587_rb

ds

cities

Wilson

he

had studied in

Oman

Muscat

Wilson had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman.

Wilson had not studied in Oman.

Wilson had studied in Muscat.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Wilson had studied in either Muscat or somewhere in Oman. However, as a matter of fact, Wilson had not studied in Oman. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Wilson had studied in Muscat.

RULEBREAKER_0010588_rb

ds

cities

Bolormaa

she

had studied in

Thailand

Bangkok

Bolormaa had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand.

Bolormaa had not studied in Thailand.

Bolormaa had studied in Bangkok.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Bolormaa had studied in either Bangkok or somewhere in Thailand. However, as a matter of fact, Bolormaa had not studied in Thailand. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Bolormaa had studied in Bangkok.

RULEBREAKER_0010589_rb

ds

cities

Tapuarii

he

had studied in

Slovakia

Bratislava

Tapuarii had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia.

Tapuarii had not studied in Slovakia.

Tapuarii had studied in Bratislava.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Tapuarii had studied in either Bratislava or somewhere in Slovakia. However, as a matter of fact, Tapuarii had not studied in Slovakia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Tapuarii had studied in Bratislava.

RULEBREAKER_0010590_rb

ds

cities

Fatemeh

she

had studied in

Czech Republic

Prague

Fatemeh had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic.

Fatemeh had not studied in Czech Republic.

Fatemeh had studied in Prague.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Fatemeh had studied in either Prague or somewhere in Czech Republic. However, as a matter of fact, Fatemeh had not studied in Czech Republic. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Fatemeh had studied in Prague.

RULEBREAKER_0010591_rb

ds

cities

Andrias

he

had studied in

Spain

Madrid

Andrias had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain.

Andrias had not studied in Spain.

Andrias had studied in Madrid.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Andrias had studied in either Madrid or somewhere in Spain. However, as a matter of fact, Andrias had not studied in Spain. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Andrias had studied in Madrid.

RULEBREAKER_0010592_rb

ds

cities

Iker

he

had studied in

Austria

Vienna

Iker had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria.

Iker had not studied in Austria.

Iker had studied in Vienna.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Iker had studied in either Vienna or somewhere in Austria. However, as a matter of fact, Iker had not studied in Austria. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Iker had studied in Vienna.

RULEBREAKER_0010593_rb

ds

cities

Sevda

she

had studied in

Indonesia

Jakarta

Sevda had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia.

Sevda had not studied in Indonesia.

Sevda had studied in Jakarta.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Sevda had studied in either Jakarta or somewhere in Indonesia. However, as a matter of fact, Sevda had not studied in Indonesia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Sevda had studied in Jakarta.

RULEBREAKER_0010594_rb

ds

cities

Leordo

he

had studied in

Pakistan

Islamabad

Leordo had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan.

Leordo had not studied in Pakistan.

Leordo had studied in Islamabad.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Leordo had studied in either Islamabad or somewhere in Pakistan. However, as a matter of fact, Leordo had not studied in Pakistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Leordo had studied in Islamabad.

RULEBREAKER_0010595_rb

ds

cities

Ayzere

she

had studied in

Brazil

Brasília

Ayzere had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil.

Ayzere had not studied in Brazil.

Ayzere had studied in Brasília.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ayzere had studied in either Brasília or somewhere in Brazil. However, as a matter of fact, Ayzere had not studied in Brazil. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ayzere had studied in Brasília.

RULEBREAKER_0010596_rb

ds

cities

Wateen

she

had studied in

Belgium

City of Brussels

Wateen had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium.

Wateen had not studied in Belgium.

Wateen had studied in City of Brussels.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Wateen had studied in either City of Brussels or somewhere in Belgium. However, as a matter of fact, Wateen had not studied in Belgium. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Wateen had studied in City of Brussels.

RULEBREAKER_0010597_rb

ds

cities

Hüseyin

he

had studied in

Tajikistan

Dushanbe

Hüseyin had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan.

Hüseyin had not studied in Tajikistan.

Hüseyin had studied in Dushanbe.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Hüseyin had studied in either Dushanbe or somewhere in Tajikistan. However, as a matter of fact, Hüseyin had not studied in Tajikistan. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Hüseyin had studied in Dushanbe.

RULEBREAKER_0010598_rb

ds

cities

Artem

he

had studied in

North Macedonia

Skopje

Artem had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia.

Artem had not studied in North Macedonia.

Artem had studied in Skopje.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Artem had studied in either Skopje or somewhere in North Macedonia. However, as a matter of fact, Artem had not studied in North Macedonia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Artem had studied in Skopje.

RULEBREAKER_0010599_rb

ds

cities

Oihan

he

had studied in

Mozambique

Maputo

Oihan had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique.

Oihan had not studied in Mozambique.

Oihan had studied in Maputo.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Oihan had studied in either Maputo or somewhere in Mozambique. However, as a matter of fact, Oihan had not studied in Mozambique. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Oihan had studied in Maputo.

RULEBREAKER_0010600_rb

ds

cities

Ethan

he

had studied in

Nicaragua

Managua

Ethan had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua.

Ethan had not studied in Nicaragua.

Ethan had studied in Managua.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ethan had studied in either Managua or somewhere in Nicaragua. However, as a matter of fact, Ethan had not studied in Nicaragua. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ethan had studied in Managua.

RULEBREAKER_0010601_rb

ds

cities

Ömer

he

had studied in

Cuba

Havana

Ömer had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba.

Ömer had not studied in Cuba.

Ömer had studied in Havana.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ömer had studied in either Havana or somewhere in Cuba. However, as a matter of fact, Ömer had not studied in Cuba. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ömer had studied in Havana.

RULEBREAKER_0010602_rb

ds

cities

Noor

she

had studied in

Angola

Luanda

Noor had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola.

Noor had not studied in Angola.

Noor had studied in Luanda.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Noor had studied in either Luanda or somewhere in Angola. However, as a matter of fact, Noor had not studied in Angola. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Noor had studied in Luanda.

RULEBREAKER_0010603_rb

ds

cities

Ida

she

had studied in

Mauritania

Nouakchott

Ida had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania.

Ida had not studied in Mauritania.

Ida had studied in Nouakchott.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ida had studied in either Nouakchott or somewhere in Mauritania. However, as a matter of fact, Ida had not studied in Mauritania. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ida had studied in Nouakchott.

RULEBREAKER_0010604_rb

ds

cities

Niviaq

she

had studied in

Barbados

Bridgetown

Niviaq had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados.

Niviaq had not studied in Barbados.

Niviaq had studied in Bridgetown.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Niviaq had studied in either Bridgetown or somewhere in Barbados. However, as a matter of fact, Niviaq had not studied in Barbados. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Niviaq had studied in Bridgetown.

RULEBREAKER_0010605_rb

ds

cities

Ibai

he

had studied in

Sweden

Stockholm

Ibai had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden.

Ibai had not studied in Sweden.

Ibai had studied in Stockholm.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ibai had studied in either Stockholm or somewhere in Sweden. However, as a matter of fact, Ibai had not studied in Sweden. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ibai had studied in Stockholm.

RULEBREAKER_0010606_rb

ds

cities

Nelio

he

had studied in

Jamaica

Kingston

Nelio had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica.

Nelio had not studied in Jamaica.

Nelio had studied in Kingston.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Nelio had studied in either Kingston or somewhere in Jamaica. However, as a matter of fact, Nelio had not studied in Jamaica. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Nelio had studied in Kingston.

RULEBREAKER_0010607_rb

ds

cities

Ha-rin

she

had studied in

Mongolia

Ulaanbaatar

Ha-rin had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia.

Ha-rin had not studied in Mongolia.

Ha-rin had studied in Ulaanbaatar.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Ha-rin had studied in either Ulaanbaatar or somewhere in Mongolia. However, as a matter of fact, Ha-rin had not studied in Mongolia. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Ha-rin had studied in Ulaanbaatar.

RULEBREAKER_0010608_rb

ds

cities

Celeste

she

had studied in

United States of America

Washington, D.C.

Celeste had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America.

Celeste had not studied in United States of America.

Celeste had studied in Washington, D.C..

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Celeste had studied in either Washington, D.C. or somewhere in United States of America. However, as a matter of fact, Celeste had not studied in United States of America. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Celeste had studied in Washington, D.C..

RULEBREAKER_0010609_rb

ds

cities

Layla

she

had studied in

Zimbabwe

Harare

Layla had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe.

Layla had not studied in Zimbabwe.

Layla had studied in Harare.

false

Premises: Suppose we are told that Layla had studied in either Harare or somewhere in Zimbabwe. However, as a matter of fact, Layla had not studied in Zimbabwe. What conclusion, if any, follows from the Premises? If you think nothing follows from the Premises, answer 'Nothing follows'. Keep your response concise.

Nothing follows

Layla had studied in Harare.