prompt listlengths 2 2 | source stringclasses 3
values | severity stringclasses 5
values | category stringclasses 186
values | has_code bool 2
classes | has_poc bool 2
classes | reference_response stringlengths 23 5k | firm stringclasses 26
values | quality_score float64 0 5 | protocol stringclasses 398
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: sponsorSeries() method fails when user want to swap for stake token using
### Description
`sponsorSeries()` fails when user want to use `swapQuote` to swap for stake token to sponsor a series.
### Impact
sponsorSeries() fails when `address(quote.sellToken) != stake`
### Recommendation
Consider implementat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Missing/limited Test Suite in Early Purchase Program
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `20183672aa44758c6c31e9d858cfac22f5e67d75`. The client provided the following explanation:
> I've added a test suite for the Early Purchase program.
**NOTE**: Some tests are failing... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Accounting breaks if end market appears multiple times in swap path
### Description
If a swap path goes through a market that also is the final destination market, share accounting breaks
### Impact
Token accounting will be broken, because the destination market will have extra tokens that its tracking of it... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | dos | true | false | ## Medium: `VaultManagerV2.sol::burnDyad` function is missing an `isDNftOwner` modifier, allowing a user to burn another user's minted DYAD
### Description
`VaultManagerV2.sol` has a function `burnDyad` that allows a DNft owner to burn his minted DYAD tokens.
However, the function does not check if the DNft id that ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unused PotLike interface
### Description
The PotLike interface is unused within the current implementation.
### Recommendation
Consider removing this interface. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: `DepositWithLock` done via `OptionToken` can be abused to permanently lock a user position
### Description
`OptionTokenV4.exerciseLp` allows depositing to other people locks and extend it permanently at close to zero cost
### Impact
Victims will be unable to unlock their unlock their positions at close to no... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | liquidation | true | false | ## High: Malicious Users Can Transfer Vault Collateral To Other Accounts To Extract Additional Yield From The Protocol
### Description
_Submitted by leastwood_
`ConvexYieldWrapper.sol` is a wrapper contract for staking convex tokens on the user's behalf, allowing them to earn rewards on their deposit. Users will inte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Inconsistent Data Format For Trusted Remotes in The XVS Bridge
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the Venus team. Addressed in: `35a3312659c8b0f443c6ded33e613aed7130d2e2`, `cb84e01596d687c87c26c2ed16f24040965cad32`. The Venus team provided the following explanation:
> We are not granting permissi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | false | false | ## Medium: rpc.Client race condition in header http.Header field
### Description
The `rpc.Client.header` field is an `http.Header` from the Go library. This is a wrapper over a map, and it is not concurrency-safe.
In the current usage, there is a race condition in the following spots:
- `rpc.Start()` is an infinite ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Don't compare boolean expressions to boolean literals
### Description
`if ( == true)` => `if ()`, `if ( == false)` => `if (!)`
*There are 3 instances of this issue:*
https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-05-cally/blob/1849f9ee12434038aa80753266ce6a2f2b082c59/contracts/src/Cally.sol#L217
https://github.com/cod... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Missing ownership check for market
### Description
## Aob's Create Market Instruction
Aob's `create_market` instruction does not compare the market account's owner against the program ID.
The instruction implicitly checks ownership when it attempts to overwrite the account buffer later, so this is not explo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: User assets may be stolen
### Description
_Acknowledged_
In Elytra, the total tvl assets are calculated based on the formula: `deposit track in pool + strategy balance + unstaking valut - reserve asset`.
In strategy, we have one `emergencyWithdraw` function. In an emergency, the admin can withdraw assets fro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: improvements toAsciiString
### Description
## Handle
gpersoon
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
The function toAsciiString can be improved the be easier to read and use less gas.
// https://github.com/code-423n4/2021-05-yield/blob/main/contracts/utils/AddressStringUtil.sol
## Proof of Concept
pragma soli... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: `addToken()` parameters are not checked
### Description
In `addToken()`: a `_tokenAddress` uniqueness check in `tokenList`. `tokenType` should be 0, 1 or 2. It may be also convinient to use an enum for `tokenType`. `_amount` should be 1 if `tokenType` for ERC721. `_id` should be 0 for ERC20. https://github.com... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | high | access-control | true | true | ## High: Zeeve admin could drain `ValidatorRewarder` by abusing off-chain BLS validation due to `QI` rewards being granted to failed registrations
### Description
[`Ignite::releaseLockedTokens`](https://github.com/Benqi-fi/ignite-contracts/blob/bbca0ddb399225f378c1d774fb70a7486e655eea/src/Ignite.sol#L580-L583) takes t... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Improper Storage Utilization
### Description
## TokenizeShares Zero Share Issue
`msg_server::TokenizeShares` does not ensure that the share is not zero. It is possible for the amount to be positive while the share is zero, resulting in the creation and storage of records without any actual shares.
> _cosmos-... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Invalid Parameters
### Description
## Issue Overview
The issue is related to the fact that both `stop_ride` and `resume_ride` functions expect `Driver` and `Rider` objects to be passed as arguments at the same time. It should be impossible for the user to own both `Driver` and `Rider` objects.
## Code Snippe... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Missing storage gap in upgradeable parent contract causes storage slot collision risk
### Description
The `VaultDeployer` abstract contract is designed to be upgradeable and inherited by child contracts `SegregatedVaultDeployer` and `SecuritizeVaultDeployer`. However, `VaultDeployer` lacks storage gap variable... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: ETH mistakenly sent over with ERC20 based `takeOrders` and `takeMultipleOneOrders` calls will be lost
### Description
_Submitted by obtarian, also found by 0xsanson, cccz, and VAD37_
### Vulnerability details
`takeOrders()` and `takeMultipleOneOrders()` are the main user facing functionality of the proto... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | true | false | ## Medium: Zap contract’s redeem() function doesn’t check which token the user wants to receive
### Description
## Handle
Ruhum
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
In the `redeem()` function, the user can pass a token address. That's the token they receive in return for the ibbtc they give back. Because of missing ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Same Order ID Can Be Used Twice in Batch Payments
### Description
The `payOrdersBatch()` function validates all orders against the initial state before updating any state in a subsequent loop. This allows duplicate `orderIds` in a single batch to bypass the `OrderAlreadyProcessed` check.
### Impact
Duplica... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | overflow | false | false | ## High: Premia Calculation Can Overflow
### Description
When calculating the accumulated premia for a position's leg, the accrued fees for the tick range are multiplied by the position's liquidity amount. Both quantities are of type `uint128` and thus can overflow in the intermediate step of `legPremia`. This results... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | true | false | ## Low: Unverified `_receiver` can cause irrecoverable token loss
### Description
**Description:** When a user bridges their YTokens using CCIP, they call [`BridgeCCIP::send`](https://github.com/YieldFiLabs/contracts/blob/40caad6c60625d750cc5c3a5a7df92b96a93a2fb/contracts/bridge/ccip/BridgeCCIP.sol#L117-L158). One of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: NatSpec comments should be increased in contracts
### Description
It is recommended that Solidity contracts are fully annotated using NatSpec for all public interfaces (everything in the ABI). It is clearly stated in the Solidity official documentation.
In complex projects such as Defi, the interpretation of ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Immediate limbs not range-checked
### Description
A missing range constraint allows a malicious prover to provide wrong "byte"-decompositions of immediate values.
### Recommendation
Add the missing range-checks. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Perform local variable checks first prior to external calls in composite `if` statement conditions
### Description
When an `if` statement condition is joined together using `&&` operators from multiple composite parts, local variable checks should be performed first prior to external calls. This is because if ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Wrong comment
### Description
```solidity
File: Timelock.sol
49: /// @notice Delay for queueing a transaction in blocks //@audit seconds, not blocks
60: /// @param _delay Delay the timelock will use, in blocks //@audit seconds, not blocks
103: /// @param eta Duration of time until transaction can be exec... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: Liquidator Can Bid With Insufficient Cash
### Description
When `executeBid()` performs `_symmetricManagerAdjustment()` on the cash asset of the bidder, there is no check that the bidder’s cash balance remains positive after the adjustment. This could result in a negative cash balance after the bid.
The impact... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: [06] `RouterSwapParams` lacks a deadlining logic and could lead to unfavourable swaps
### Description
*Note: At the judge’s request [here](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-revert-lend-findings/issues/128#issuecomment-2050761513), this downgraded issue from the same warden has been included in this report ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | signature | true | false | ## High: Missing nonce on PendingDepositRefund event might lead to a double spend
### Description
A lack of nonce information on the deposit refund event might allow a third-party tool to confound which deposit was refunded. A deposit is identified by its unique nonce:
```solidity
depositNonce = ++ _depositNonce;
_no... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Superfluous event fields
### Description
`block.timestamp` and `block.number` are added to event information by default so adding them manually wastes gas
*There are 4 instances of this issue.* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Use constants.
### Description
**Description**
StakingB.sol Lines 17, 18, 19
StakingB_1.sol Lines 518
If the value of the storage variable can’t be changed it can be set as constant in order to save
gas.
**Recommendation**:
Set offered storage as constant | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: Block gas limit can be hit due to loop depth
### Description
[/contracts/farm-manager/src/farm/commands.rs# L43-L94](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-11-mantra-dex/blob/26714ea59dab7ecfafca9db1138d60adcf513588/contracts/farm-manager/src/farm/commands.rs# L43-L94)
### Finding description and impact
The `cl... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Frontrunning for unallowed minting of Short and Long tokens
### Description
### Vulnerability details
#### Unallowed minting of Short and Long tokens
The documentation states that minting of the Short and Long tokens should only be done by the governance.
The problem is, that as long as the **\_mintHook... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | storage | true | false | ## Gas: [3] State variables can be packed into fewer storage slots
### Description
If variables occupying the same slot are both written the same function or by the constructor, avoids a separate Gsset (**20000 gas**). Reads of the variables can also be cheaper
*There are 3 instances of this issue:* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | dos | false | false | ## High: (HAL-02) DENIAL OF SERVICE
### Description
Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability that arises from the exploitation of SQL Injection (SQLi) vulnerabilities, specifically through the use of the PostgreSQL pg\_sleep function. By injecting malicious SQL queries that include the pg\_sleep function, an attacker can... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Incorrect `_collapseBlock` Returned by `miningState()`
### Description
**Update**
Upon discussion with the client, it was determined that the values returned by `miningState()` are supposed to be used in tandem in order to form judgements about the state of the game. Therefore, we are marking this issue as "Ac... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | overflow | false | false | ## Low: Outdated Solidity Version
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. The Solidity version was updated to `0.8.18`. Addressed in: `57cb2740d6d655318d2e85607de33b802d2a9354`.
**File(s) affected:**`AGStaking.sol`
**Description:** Currently, the system uses Solidity version `0.8.9` which is not ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | logic | true | false | ## High: Pending payouts excluded from total balance cause incorrect share calculations
### Description
After each game completes, the protocol attempts to transfer the winner's payout through `Staking.transferPayout()`. If this transfer fails, the amount is stored in `pendingPayouts` to be claimed later. However, the... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Form::_depositAndValidate redundant and inconsistent slippage check
### Description
Two different slippage checks are implemented to prevent a user from losing funds when depositing to an ERC5115 vault.
1. The first check can be seen in `ERC5115Form.sol#L520` and is verifying:
```
shares >= singleVaultDat... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | true | ## Medium: Lender DoS if all asset is borrowed or realized
### Description
If all asset is borrowed (or already realized to restaker interests), `realizedInterest` is 0. Thus, there is no rewards to distribute to restakers. However, `BorrowLogic` is missing zero check, thus it will try to distribute rewards anway, whi... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Use of outdated libraries
### Description
Throughout the codebase, several OpenZeppelin contracts implementations are inherited and used. These contracts are used to implement access control, pausing functionality, ERC20 token standards, and more. However, some of the versions of these contracts are outdated a... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Protocol Fees Can Be Bypassed By Users
### Description
Fee timestamps are crucial for calculating the payments users owe to Brava during interactions; however, users can directly manipulate these timestamps, potentially avoiding any fee payments.
A user can interact directly with the AdminVault contract thro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | false | false | ## Low: Risk of Out of Gas by Looping
### Description
**Update**
Marked as "Acknowledged" by the client. The client provided the following explanation:
> Initiating a proposal requires permission, so this issue will not be exploited maliciously. In addition, we can use the retrieveTokenFor function to retrieve the to... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Move payable `receive()` function from `PorticoBase` into `PorticoFinish`
### Description
**Description:** Move payable `receive()` function from `PorticoBase` into `PorticoFinish` since `PorticoFinish` is the only contract which needs to receive eth when it calls `WETH.withdraw()`.
`PorticoStart` which also ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | initialization | true | true | _Submitted by 0xA5DF_
Lines: <https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-fractional/blob/8f2697ae727c60c93ea47276f8fa128369abfe51/src/modules/Buyout.sol#L118-L138>
<https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-07-fractional/blob/8f2697ae727c60c93ea47276f8fa128369abfe51/src/modules/Buyout.sol#L156-L165>
### Vulnerability details
I... | Code4rena | 5 | Fractional |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | logic | true | false | ## High: Premature Token Burn In Withdraw
### Description
## GMIndex Withdraw Issues
In GMIndex, invoking the `withdraw` function burns GMI tokens at the beginning of the function before calculating the withdrawal amount. This may result in an incorrect calculation of the withdrawal amount due to the premature burn s... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | access-control | true | false | ## Medium: Gator - Missing Runtime Schema Verification for Profile Sync Store/Retrieve ✓ Fixed
### Description
The Profile Sync performs unsafe deserialization of permission data without runtime schema validation.
* `JSON.parse` only validates JSON syntax, not data structure
* The type assertion `as StoredGrantedPerm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | initialization | true | false | ## Medium: Boost creator can collect all the fees by setting referralFee to 9_000 and give claimants his address as referrer_ address
### Description
The boost creator can set the value of referralFee to 9_000 when creating the boost. The `BoostCore::referralFee` (the base fee) is set to 1000 in line 70,
https://git... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | liquidation | false | false | ## Low: locking and freeing from LockstakeEngine can fail if ilk.dust increases
### Description
The lock and free functions add/remove collateral from the urn using the following method:
```
vat.frob(ilk, urn, urn, address(0), ±int256(wad), 0);
```
This function will fail if `urn.art > 0 && urn.art * rate < ilk.dust... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | true | false | ## Gas: Removing code related to testing - to decrease the contract size and the deployment costs
### Description
**File:** `SystemContext.sol`
[File: code/system-contracts/contracts/SystemContext.sol](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-03-zksync/blob/main/code/system-contracts/contracts/SystemContext.sol#L469)
Bot... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | signature | true | true | ## Gas: Hardcoding keys would cost less gas on deployment
### Description
The variable declaration of the following keys can be cheaper if they were hardcoded:
```solidity
bytes32 public constant ATTESTATION_TBS_PREFIX = keccak256(hex"846a5369676e61747572653144a101382240");
bytes32 public constant ATTESTATION_DIGEST ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Greater or Equal Comparison Costs Less Gas than Greater Comparison
### Description
In Solidity, the >= operator costs less gas than the > operator. This is because the Solidity compiler uses the LT opcode for >= comparisons, which requires less gas than the combination of GT and ISZERO opcodes used for > compa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | access-control | false | false | ## High: Attacker can DOS private party by donating ETH then calling buy
### Description
_Submitted by 0x52_
Party is DOS'd and may potentially lose access to NFT.
### Proof of Concept
[Crowdfund.sol#L280-L298](https://github.com/PartyDAO/party-contracts-c4/blob/3896577b8f0fa16cba129dc2867aba786b730c1b/contracts/cr... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Redundant `afterInitialize()` Function
### Description
The `LimitOrderManager.afterInitialize` function exposed to plugins duplicates the exact same initialization that `LimitOrderManager.place()` already performs for any uninitialized pool. Since `place()` calls `_initialize()` when `initialized[pool] == fals... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: Not the whole amount of REEF is transferred due to accuracy loss. SqwidMarketplace.sol: functions enterRaffle(), endRaffle().
### Description
**Description**
When a user enters a raffle, his message value is divided by 1e18, losing the accuracy of the
message value, since Solidity doesn’t support float num... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: `internal` functions only called once can be inlined to save gas
### Description
Not inlining costs **20 to 40 gas** because of two extra `JUMP` instructions and additional stack operations needed for function calls.
*There are 9 instances of this issue.* | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Changing stablecoin on TokenBank can mess up fees collection
### Description
**Description:** The feeAmount on each token is computed with the decimals of the current stablecoin (initially, a stablecoin of 6 decimals). If the stablecoin is changed to another one that uses decimals != than 6, if there are any p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | rounding | true | false | ## Low: Analysis of balanceDecreaseAllowed when there is at least one reserve borrowed but the
### Description
- **Total Debt in ETH**: 0
- **Severity**: Low Risk
- **Context**:
- MiniPoolGenericLogic.sol: Lines 79-84
- GenericLogic.sol: Lines 97-99
### Recommendation
In general, there should be an invariant tha... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Updates to treasure code and data are irreversible
### Description
The `op::update` operation of the treasure contract updates the code and the data of the contract at once. If this update is incorrect, there is no way to recover from it.
```plaintext
if (op == op::update) {
var new_code = in_msg_body~load_... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | true | false | ## High: spTKNMinimalOracle `_calculateSpTknPerBase()` does not calculate correct price for podded or fraxlend pair pairedLpTKNs.
### Description
spTKNMinimalOracle `_calculateSpTknPerBase()` does not calculate correct price for podded or fraxlend pair pairedLpTKNs.
### Impact
Pods with podded token or fraxlend pair ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | front-running | true | false | ## Medium: Malicious actors can front-run setYieldConvEnabled
### Description
Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2025-01-peapods-finance-judging/issues/313
## Found by
pashap9990
### Root Cause
AutoCompoundingPodLp'owner can enable or disable processing reward tokens through `AutoCompoundingPodLp::setYield... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | gas | other | false | false | ## Gas: Avoid `storage` keyword during modifiers
### Description
The problem with using modifiers with storage variables is that these accesses will likely have to be obtained multiple times, to pass it to the modifier, and to read it into the method code.
As you can see the following methods require to extract the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unbounded `lockUntil` Parameter Allows Permanent Token Lock
### Description
Both `CLLockerFactory.lock()` and `V2LockerFactory.lock()` accept a `uint32 _lockUntil` argument but do not validate it against a maximum lock duration. Since `uint32` can represent values up to `type(uint32).max`, a user may inadverte... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | cross-chain | false | false | ## Low: Prevent Irreparable Governance State
### Description
## SetGovernanceDataSource
The `SetGovernanceDataSource` action is used to change the cross-chain address of the governance message emitter authority. If a `SetGovernanceDataSource` VAA was executed with an incorrect DataSource, it would leave the contract ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Missing zero/threshold check for maxAssets
### Description
## Handle
0xRajeev
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
A zero or some minimum threshold check is missing for newMaxAssets parameter of _setMaxAssets() function which is used by admin to set the maximum number of assets that controls how many market... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | true | false | ## Medium: Missing receiver validation in `withdrawFrom`
### Description
_Submitted by cmichel_
[FETH.sol#L433](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-02-foundation/blob/4d8c8931baffae31c7506872bf1100e1598f2754/contracts/FETH.sol#L433)
The `FETH.withdrawFrom` function does not validate its `to` parameter.
Funds can be l... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | oracle | false | false | ## Low: General informational issues
### Description
## Context
(No context files were provided by the reviewer)
## Description
## Natspec typos, errors or improvements
- **GovernanceCCIPReceiver.sol#L39-L42:** The `GovernanceCCIPReceiver` constructor natspec is outdated. It's referring to the `BaseGovernanceReceive... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Dead Code popup ✓ Fixed
### Description
`const popup` is retrieved from the snap state but never used within the context of `confirmAddress()`. This might be an indicator of an incomplete implementation of the `togglePopup` setting or dead code.
**snap/src/utils/fetchAddress.ts:L40-L47**
```
export const c... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | solodit_api | medium | Validation | true | false | Source: https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-bond-judging/issues/11
## Found by
rvierdiiev
## Summary
BondBaseSDA.setDefaults doesn't validate inputs which can lead to initializing new markets incorrectly
## Vulnerability Detail
https://github.com/sherlock-audit/2022-11-bond/blob/main/src/bases/BondBaseSDA.sol... | Sherlock | 4 | Bond Protocol |
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | overflow | false | false | ## Medium: Intended Overflows Aborts
### Description
## Solidity Version 0.8.X: Checked Arithmetic Operations
In the Solidity version 0.8.X, checked arithmetic operations are used by default. Operations that may result in integer overflows or underflows will fail. In certain circumstances, however, these overflows ar... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | true | ## High: `updateState()` should be called in `depositEth()` and `redeemEth()`
### Description
Whenever the liquidity of a LToken changes, `getRateFactor` will be changed.
Therefore, `updateState()` must be called prior to the change to settle the pending interests.
### Impact
Incorrect amounts of interests will be p... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Consumption Concerns Due to Extended Error Messages
### Description
**Severity**: Informational
**Status**: Resolved
**Description**
The smart contract employs detailed error messages within require statements, offering developers and users specific insights into the conditions that trigger a requirement fa... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | true | false | ## High: V2AMO is not compatible with Velodrome/Aerodrome.
### Description
According to the docs, the Dex scope for SolidlyV2 includes Velodrome/Aerodrome.
> We expect the SolidlyV2 tech-implementation work with the “classic” pools on the following Dexes: Velodrome, Aerodrome, Thena, Equalizer (Fantom/Sonic/Base), Ra... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: `RouterV2.receive()` function access to be restricted
### Description
The `RouterV2` contract is capable of receiving `Ether` from any user due a payable `receive()` function. This could lead to unintended fund losses for users. The only scenario where transferring `Ether` to the router is intended is when a ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | other | false | false | ## High: `WETH.allowance()` returns wrong result
### Description
_Submitted by hansfriese, also found by 0xf15ers_
WETH.allowance() returns wrong result.
I can't find other contracts that use this function but WETH.sol is a base contract and it should be fixed properly.
### Proof of Concept
In this function, the "... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Updating withdrawal period impacts ongoing withdrawals
### Description
The `updateWithdrawalPeriod` function allows the owner to modify the withdrawal period.
However, modifying the withdrawal period will impact all ongoing withdrawals and not only the new withdrawals. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | other | false | false | ## Medium: Maximum number of withdrawals processed on every block
### Description
The `BeaconState.ExectedWithdrawals()` function at `state-transition/pkg/core/state/statedb.go#L192` is used to grab a list of all of the validators that are withdrawable, as defined in the Ethereum consensus specs:
```python
def get_ex... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | true | false | ## Low: Approve function is no check the _isRevoked or not, make lead to isApproved function failed
### Description
The Approve function:
```solidity
function _approve(SpendPermission memory spendPermission) internal {
// check token is non-zero
if (spendPermission.token == address(0)) revert ZeroToken();
// ch... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | token | false | false | ## Medium: Burned tokens can be re-minted into the `totalSupply`
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact:**
Low, as it won't lead to funds loss but breaks a protocol invariant/assumption
**Likelihood:**
High, as it becomes a problem whenever someone burns their tokens
**Description**
The `FlorenceFinanceMediciToken`... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | liquidation | true | false | ## Medium: Liquidated NFTs can earn more than liquidation incentive
### Description
The liquidation incentive (currently set to 1.08x) is used to calculate the surplus collateral a liquidator will receive in excess of the amount they repay. It is intended to define the liquidation rewards.
This works by allowing the ... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Lack Of Ordering Checks
### Description
## Time-Related Parameters Initialization in LBA
LBA includes the initialization of several time-related parameters that define the start and end times for different contract phases. Ordering these time-related parameters, specifically the phase begin times, is essentia... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | false | false | ## High: The Contract `TGKMainContract` Is Not Able to Receive NFTs via Safe Transfers
### Description
**Update**
The client implemented the recommended actions.
**Update**
Marked as "Fixed" by the client. Addressed in: `c47765595a3fc73626a0792b2460542e00935913`.
**File(s) affected:**`TGKMainContract.sol`
**Descri... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | false | false | ## Low: Getter functions do not revert on non existing streamId
### Description
The following getter functions do not revert on non-existing streamIds:
- `getAsset()`
- `getCliffTime()`
- `getDepositAmount()`
- `getEndTime()`
- `getRange()`
- `getRecipient()`
- `getSegments()`
- `getSender()`
- `getStartTime()`
- `get... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | rounding | true | false | ## Medium: event_ring_util.c is_writer_fdout-of-bounds memory access
### Description
Commit `fca3deaa` introduces the function `is_writer_fd`. This function is reproduced below:
```c
static bool is_writer_fd(ino_t ring_ino, int fdinfo_entry) {
char const FDINFO_DELIM[] = "\t :";
char read_buf[256];
char *scan =... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | false | false | ## Low: GoVarAndConstTypeMayBeOmitted
### Description
**Severity**: Low
**Status**: Acknowledged
**Description:**
The type of some variables and constants can be omitted, as Go can infer them.
**Files**:
app/ante/sigverify.go: 18
app/test_helpers.go: 42
ibc/testing/app.go: 30
x/evm/statedb/mock_test.go: 16
x/evm... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | false | false | ## Medium: BondOracleAdapter can fetch price from inefficient Pool on Aerodrome
### Description
The `BondOracleAdapter`'s `getPool` function can select an inefficient pool, leading to inappropriate price feeds. An attacker can create a pool with an extremely low fee and inefficient tick spacing, which the adapter migh... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | token | true | false | ## High: Blocked ERC20 tokens can still be withdrawn
### Description
Some ERC20 tokens are expected to be blocked in the contract with the `onlyUnblockedTokens` modifier, and the owner shouldn't be able to withdraw them. That's the reason this check is implemented for `withdrawERC20()`:
```solidity
function withdrawE... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | token | true | false | ## Low: Function depositAsset() allows 0amount of native assets
### Description
The function `depositAsset()` disallows `amount == 0` for ERC20 assets; however, it does allow `amount == 0` for native assets.
```solidity
function depositAsset(address assetId, uint256 amount) internal {
if (isNativeAsset(assetId)) {
... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | medium | front-running | true | true | ## Medium: Self transfer of all child tokens results in decement of `ChildToken.totalInvestors` storage variable
### Description
Similar to Issue [*Frontrunning call to `ChildToken::resolveUser` and transferring all of the oldUser's `childToken` balance causes the `totalInvestor` counter to be decremented twice*](#fro... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | medium | oracle | true | false | ## Medium: `FETCH_TIME` is too large and this can lead to a stale price
### Description
**Severity**
**Impact**: High, because it might return an stale price
**Likelihood**: Low, it can happen in highly volatile markets
**Description**
The `FETCH_TIME` value in the `TapOracle.sol` contract is set to 4 hours, which... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Remove return parameters from `rOUSG::_mintShares` and `_burnShares` as they are never read
### Description
Remove return parameters from `rOUSG::_mintShares` and `_burnShares` as they are never read. This saves 1 storage read in each function plus the cost of the return parameters. | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | other | true | false | ## Low: Unstakers unable to receive staked amount if blacklisted by staking token
### Description
In the `Staking` contract, the `finalizeUnstake()` function attempts to send the unstaked amount to the staker's address (`msg.sender`). However, if the unstaker's address is blacklisted by the staking token, they will be... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | reentrancy | true | false | ## Low: [03] `fillOrder` may be subject to reentrancy
### Description
The function [fillOrder](https://github.com/code-423n4/2024-01-init-capital-invitational/blob/a01c4de620be98f9e57a60cf6a82d4feaec54f58/contracts/hook/MarginTradingHook.sol#L372) set order status as filled after external token transfer.
https://docs... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | dos | true | false | ## Low: Open TODOs
### Description
Code architecture, incentives, and error handling/reporting questions/issues should be resolved before deployment
1. File: src/Funding.sol (line [15](https://github.com/code-423n4/2022-04-badger-citadel/blob/dab143a990a9c355578fbb15cd3c884614e33f42/src/Funding.sol#L15))
2. File:... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | true | false | ## Low: Missing Duration Validation Enables Zero Division in Base Asset Bridge
### Description
The BaseAssetBridge.sol contract uses a `duration` variable as a divisor in multiple functions without validating that it's non-zero. The duration is set in the constructor and cannot be modified afterwards, but lacks zero-v... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | access-control | false | false | ## Low: Privileged functions are missing event emissions
### Description
## Review Summary
**Context:**
(No context files were provided by the reviewer)
**Issue Identified:**
Privileged `onlyOwner` Inbox functions `setMailbox()` and `drain()` are missing event emissions. Emitting events when the Hyperlane mailbo... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | high | oracle | false | false | ## High: Redemption value of synths can be manipulated to drain VaderPoolV2 of all native assets in the associated pair
### Description
## Handle
TomFrenchBlockchain
## Vulnerability details
## Impact
Draining of funds from `VaderPoolV2`
## Proof of Concept
See the `VaderPool.mintSynth` function:
https://github.... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | cyfrin_structured | low | other | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary event emission when configuration values do not change
### Description
`RockoFlashRefinance::updateFee` updates the `ROCKO_FEE_BP` variable and emits a `FeeUpdated` event regardless of whether the new fee value is different from the current one. This leads to unnecessary event emissions when the ow... | 0 | ||
[
{
"role": "system",
"content": "You are an expert smart contract security auditor. Analyze the provided Solidity code for vulnerabilities.\n\nFor each finding, output a structured block:\nFINDING | contract: <name> | function: <name> | bug_class: <CWE/category> | confidence: <0-100>\n\nThen provide:\n- desc... | skyward_49k | low | initialization | false | false | ## Low: Unnecessary Initialization verification Severity: Quality Assurance
### Description
**Description:**
The require! statement in the new function is used to check if the contract has already been initialized before. However, the function also uses the init macro which is responsible for initializing the contract... | 0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.