Datasets:

qruisjtu
/

EmbodiedRestore

license: odc-by
language:
  - en
pretty_name: EmbodiedRestore
size_categories:
  - 10K<n<100K
task_categories:
  - image-to-image
  - robotics
  - other
tags:
  - image-restoration
  - image-quality-assessment
  - robotics
  - robosuite
  - mujoco
  - distortion
  - tid2013
  - kadid-10k
  - pi0
  - pi0.5
  - openvla
  - benchmark
configs:
  - config_name: frames
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: manifest.csv
  - config_name: rollouts
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: results.csv
  - config_name: taxonomy
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: distort_taxonomy.csv

EmbodiedRestore

Paired robotic first-frame observations (low-quality / ground-truth) under 25 distortions from the TID2013 / KADID-10k taxonomy, evaluated by three policies (π0.5, π0, OpenVLA). Built for benchmarking image restoration / IQA on robot-observation distributions, with downstream policy success rates(SR) and steps to successas(StS) as secondary signals.

To promote the development of image restoration model for robot vision systems, we will continue to maintain this dataset and release more first-frame observations generated by our benchmarked image restoration models, along with their corresponding SR&StS data.

A full Croissant 1.0 + RAI metadata document is shipped at the repo root: croissant.json. It is richer than the auto-generated Croissant served by Hugging Face — please prefer it when ingesting the dataset programmatically.

At a glance


Frames (PNG)	3 policies × 25 distortions × 100 episodes × 4 views = 30,000
Rollouts	3 policies × 25 distortions × 100 episodes = 7,500
Distortions	25, taxonomized in `distort_taxonomy.csv` (noise / blur / color / compression / brightness / spatial / sharpness)
Policies	π0.5, π0, OpenVLA
Cameras	base, wrist
Roles	LQ (distorted) ↔ GT (clean)
License	ODC-BY
Source simulator	Robosuite (MIT) on top of MuJoCo (Apache-2.0)

Repository layout

EmbodiedRestore/
├── README.md
├── croissant.json                 Croissant 1.0 + RAI metadata
├── manifest.csv                   30,000 rows — one per PNG frame
├── results.csv                    7,500 rows — one per rollout
├── distort_taxonomy.csv           25 rows — id → name / family / reference
├── build_metadata.py              regenerates the four files above
├── Pi05_DistortOnly/
│   ├── distort_0/
│   │   ├── firstframe_distort_0_eps1_0.png   ... eps100_3.png   (400 PNGs)
│   │   └── result.json                        success_rate + 100 env_metadata
│   └── distort_1/ ... distort_24/
├── Pi0_DistortOnly/                same shape as above
└── openvla_DistortOnly/            same shape as above

File naming

<policy>_DistortOnly/distort_<id>/firstframe_distort_<id>_eps<e>_<v>.png

<id>: 0–24, see distort_taxonomy.csv
<e>: 1–100, episode index (1-indexed). The corresponding entry in the matching result.json is env_metadata[e-1] (0-indexed).
<v>: view × role suffix
- 0 = base camera, LQ (distorted)
- 1 = wrist camera, LQ
- 2 = base camera, GT (clean)
- 3 = wrist camera, GT

results.csv already normalises eps to the 1-indexed filename convention, so you can join it with manifest.csv directly:

import pandas as pd
m = pd.read_csv("manifest.csv")
r = pd.read_csv("results.csv")
joined = m.merge(r, on=["policy", "distort_id", "eps", "distort_name"])

Tabular schemas

`manifest.csv` (30,000 rows)

column	type	notes
`path`	str	relative path from repo root
`policy`	str	`pi0.5` / `pi0` / `openvla`
`distort_id`	int	0..24
`distort_name`	str	matches `distort_taxonomy.csv`
`eps`	int	1..100
`camera`	str	`base` / `wrist`
`role`	str	`lq` / `gt`

`results.csv` (7,500 rows)

column	type	notes
`policy`	str	`pi0.5` / `pi0` / `openvla`
`distort_id`	int	0..24
`distort_name`	str
`eps`	int	1..100, joins manifest
`wall_material`	str	from simulator
`table_material`	str	from simulator
`object`	str	manipulation target (cube / lemon / hammer / ...)
`success`	str	literal `success` / `failure`
`steps`	int	episode length; capped at 250 on failure
`success_rate`	float	distort-level rate; same value repeats over the 100 rows of that (policy, distort_id) group

`distort_taxonomy.csv` (25 rows)

id, name, family, reference — distortion families follow the TID2013 / KADID-10k benchmark taxonomy.

Quick start

from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
local_dir = snapshot_download(
    repo_id="qruisjtu/EmbodiedRestore",
    repo_type="dataset",
)

import pandas as pd
m = pd.read_csv(f"{local_dir}/manifest.csv")

# all LQ base-camera frames under JPEG compression for OpenVLA
sel = m.query("policy == 'openvla' and distort_name == 'jpeg_compression' "
              "and camera == 'base' and role == 'lq'")
print(sel.head())

Pair LQ ↔ GT for an image-restoration training loop:

lq = m.query("role == 'lq'")
gt = m.query("role == 'gt'").rename(columns={"path": "gt_path"})
pairs = lq.merge(gt, on=["policy", "distort_id", "distort_name", "eps", "camera"]) \
          .rename(columns={"path": "lq_path"})

Croissant

import mlcroissant as mlc
ds = mlc.Dataset(jsonld="croissant.json")
for r in ds.records("rollouts"):
    print(r); break

The frames and rollouts RecordSets are the recommended entry points. For raw per-distortion JSON outputs, see the policy_results FileSet (one result.json per <policy>_DistortOnly/distort_<id>/).

Intended use

Primary: benchmarking image restoration and image-quality-assessment algorithms on the distribution of robot first-frame observations.
Secondary: studying how restoration / denoising affects downstream manipulation success across modern VLA policies.

Limitations

Only first-frame observations are kept.
Single simulator (Robosuite/MuJoCo).
Each distortion is applied at a fixed strength.

Ethics

Fully synthetic; contains no humans, faces, voices, or personally identifiable information.

Citation

TODO: arXiv / NeurIPS bibtex

Acknowledgements

Built on top of Robosuite and MuJoCo. Distortion taxonomy follows TID2013 and KADID-10k. Policies evaluated: π0.5, π0, OpenVLA.