subreddit stringclasses 7
values | author stringlengths 3 20 | id stringlengths 5 7 | content stringlengths 67 30.4k | score int64 0 140k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
programmerhumor | samwelches | iwnowyc | <|sols|><|sot|>VS Code has been a popular choice among a majority of programmers<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/tdi3q6xnbf0a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Does anyone use Sublime text anymore?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 469 |
programmerhumor | diewhitegirls | iwon4dl | <|sols|><|sot|>VS Code has been a popular choice among a majority of programmers<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/tdi3q6xnbf0a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>Behold [On the Turing Completeness of PowerPoint](https://youtu.be/uNjxe8ShM-8)<|eor|><|sor|>This is an unholy affront to god, built from skill, way too much time, and a complete lack of sanity. I applaud this lunatic.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 469 |
programmerhumor | LeBaux | iwp121b | <|sols|><|sot|>VS Code has been a popular choice among a majority of programmers<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/tdi3q6xnbf0a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>When you see that Eclipse guy with light mode, youll know that they have seen shit in their godly life.<|eor|><|sor|>Just sat through a two hour meeting with our lead software engineer.
For two hours we talked through a really difficult data model for a complicated process and we watched as he masterfully took notes in Notepad++ (approx. 52 tabs open, obvi), ran tests in Eclipse (light mode, natch), and then just freehand threw rows into our development SQL tables.
I'm over here with my shiny dual 4k screens and Intellij Ultimate Edition dark mode and I'm not even a quarter as productive as he is on his 1080p company issue latop and trackpad.<|eor|><|sor|>> and then just freehand threw rows into our development SQL tables.
(audible gasp)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 387 |
programmerhumor | flooronthefour | iwoed8a | <|sols|><|sot|>VS Code has been a popular choice among a majority of programmers<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/tdi3q6xnbf0a1.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>When you see that Eclipse guy with light mode, youll know that they have seen shit in their godly life.<|eor|><|sor|>I knew this guy once. An older lead Dev with extremely strong opinions. He thought that using if statements was an anti-pattern.
I will say that as bonkers as his approaches could be, the guy's code looked incredible. (At least when I was a fresh university graduate)<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>> Ternary is only ok if it's like 20 characters max.
this is why I use emojis as variable names - ? : <|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 368 |
programmerhumor | ManagerOfLove | n4imcl | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32,928 |
programmerhumor | amateurfunk | gww21vc | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's interesting that (AFAIK) nobody made these kinds of jokes when Jeff Bezos got divorced. I guess it's because nobody likes him.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,577 |
programmerhumor | dannyboy2475 | gww17v4 | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Can get your enemies banned from Xbox live?!?!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,535 |
programmerhumor | le_beret | gww9uvc | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Can get your enemies banned from Xbox live?!?!<|eor|><|sor|>"My husband is the CEO of Microsoft!"<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 765 |
programmerhumor | PenguinPeculiaris | gwvxcwg | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Swiped left. Looking for something leaner.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 566 |
programmerhumor | Dragon_yum | gwwb6w4 | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Swiped left. Looking for something leaner.<|eor|><|sor|>Looking for that daddy Torvalds.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 309 |
programmerhumor | moriero | gww4bdq | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's interesting that (AFAIK) nobody made these kinds of jokes when Jeff Bezos got divorced. I guess it's because nobody likes him.<|eor|><|sor|>I heard Amazon and AWS have a bad reputation in the industry as employers<|eor|><|sor|>So does microsoft
They're trying more, though<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 264 |
programmerhumor | supercyberlurker | gwvt7l0 | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Okay don't play with my heart here.
Visual Studio Enterprise for free?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 231 |
programmerhumor | dikkdokk | gwwelgi | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Can get your enemies banned from Xbox live?!?!<|eor|><|sor|>"My husband is the CEO of Microsoft!"<|eor|><|sor|>pls no ban me mrs nadella<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 222 |
programmerhumor | Dagusiu | gwwljv5 | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>What does enterprise even do?
Im fine with my vs as long as it shows me errors<|eor|><|sor|>It's just like the normal Visual Studio, except it has Clippy.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 174 |
programmerhumor | Self_Reddicating | gwwlu13 | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Can get your enemies banned from Xbox live?!?!<|eor|><|sor|>"My husband is the CEO of Microsoft!"<|eor|><|sor|>Imagine working in the Xbox admin team and having the ceo call you to ban someone<|eor|><|sor|>"Hello, this is Chairman Gates. I need an immediate ban on user 69Bilbo$aggins."<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 171 |
programmerhumor | dsmklsd | gwwbb0i | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's interesting that (AFAIK) nobody made these kinds of jokes when Jeff Bezos got divorced. I guess it's because nobody likes him.<|eor|><|sor|>I heard Amazon and AWS have a bad reputation in the industry as employers<|eor|><|sor|>So does microsoft
They're trying more, though<|eor|><|sor|>They've improved. I fucking hated Microsoft from about 1995-2015. Now they're in more of a neutral "lets see where this goes" state. They have been acting better, and some other places like Oracle have stepped up the comparison on being shit.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 170 |
programmerhumor | BellacosePlayer | gwwkmc5 | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's interesting that (AFAIK) nobody made these kinds of jokes when Jeff Bezos got divorced. I guess it's because nobody likes him.<|eor|><|sor|>I heard Amazon and AWS have a bad reputation in the industry as employers<|eor|><|sor|>The guy I work with who worked at Amazon for a few years had nothing nice to say about it besides the pay.
And he's a really nice guy who is a treat to work with due to being extremely skilled, so I really doubt the problem was on his end.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 168 |
programmerhumor | ZCdis | gwwgb9s | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Can get your enemies banned from Xbox live?!?!<|eor|><|sor|>"My husband is the CEO of Microsoft!"<|eor|><|sor|>Imagine working in the Xbox admin team and having the ceo call you to ban someone<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 158 |
programmerhumor | PingGoesThePenguin | gwvzpk6 | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Okay don't play with my heart here.
Visual Studio Enterprise for free?<|eor|><|sor|>Nah, he does discounts, he not made of money.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 155 |
programmerhumor | genericneim | gwway01 | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's interesting that (AFAIK) nobody made these kinds of jokes when Jeff Bezos got divorced. I guess it's because nobody likes him.<|eor|><|sor|>I heard Amazon and AWS have a bad reputation in the industry as employers<|eor|><|sor|>I've only heard good things about working for AWS honestly<|eor|><|sor|>Oh, and how about working overtime and taking a piss in a bottle because workers have to deliver all the TCP/IP packets?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 135 |
programmerhumor | 4cidAndy | gwvtf4c | <|sols|><|sot|>How to get every programmer weak<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hg2g18ud52x61.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>But I want the JetBrain IDEs not VS, if it has to be VS then pls let it be VSCode<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 129 |
programmerhumor | ag425 | hidqw6 | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32,929 |
programmerhumor | digicow | fwfmff6 | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>This is known as [Cunningham's Law](https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham%27s_Law)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,264 |
programmerhumor | UnsubstantiatedClaim | fwfs1n0 | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>This is known as [Cunningham's Law](https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham%27s_Law)<|eor|><|sor|>You're supposed to say it's Muphry's Law or Occam's Razorblade so Albert Einstein can correct you with Cunningham's Law.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,706 |
programmerhumor | dtn8 | fwg6k1d | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's all fun and games until someone comments on your wrong answer saying that it worked for them.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,122 |
programmerhumor | dismayhurta | fwg51ne | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Or you can just shit all over a language. Say If X so good, why the hell doesnt it do Y? Heres my code to prove it sucks.
Youll get a ton of answers that solve your problem and calling you an idiot. An idiot with working code.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 945 |
programmerhumor | piefacethrowspie | fwg2tid | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>This is known as [Cunningham's Law](https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham%27s_Law)<|eor|><|sor|>You're supposed to say it's Muphry's Law or Occam's Razorblade so Albert Einstein can correct you with Cunningham's Law.<|eor|><|sor|>Technically that is not the correct procedure.<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>*Must. Resist.*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 496 |
programmerhumor | Dubalubawubwub | fwgcgkj | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The version I heard years ago is that if you just ask for help with XYZ in Linux they'll tell you to RTFM. If you complain loudly that its *impossible* to do XYZ in Linux and its *so* simple in Windows, you will immediately have an army of Linux experts appear and give you detailed instructions on how to do XYZ in eleven different distros.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 485 |
programmerhumor | WhenRedditFlies | fwg8yjn | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's all fun and games until someone comments on your wrong answer saying that it worked for them.<|eor|><|sor|>YoU cAnT uSE WinDOwS wHilE pRogRAmMiNg SWITCH TO LINUX NOW ^idiot<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 449 |
programmerhumor | nickmuscle | fwfso4k | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>This is known as [Cunningham's Law](https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham%27s_Law)<|eor|><|sor|>You're supposed to say it's Muphry's Law or Occam's Razorblade so Albert Einstein can correct you with Cunningham's Law.<|eor|><|sor|>Technically that is not the correct procedure.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 376 |
programmerhumor | Just_another_learner | fwg6yz0 | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Or you can just shit all over a language. Say If X so good, why the hell doesnt it do Y? Heres my code to prove it sucks.
Youll get a ton of answers that solve your problem and calling you an idiot. An idiot with working code.<|eor|><|sor|>And that's what matters in life<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 278 |
programmerhumor | CyclopsAirsoft | fwfww47 | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It isn't necessarily because "they just want to prove others wrong". Shutting down misinformation is important; especially today. If we had more people correcting bullshit, we'd be better off.<|eor|><|sor|>Question marked as duplicate. Deleted.
*Link to question that was for a version 5 years old with solutions that no longer work in the new architecture when the question specifically mentioned such.*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 261 |
programmerhumor | joaizn | fwga237 | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>[Relevant xkcd](https://xkcd.com/386/)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 225 |
programmerhumor | Dobypeti | fwgheph | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's all fun and games until someone comments on your wrong answer saying that it worked for them.<|eor|><|sor|>YoU cAnT uSE WinDOwS wHilE pRogRAmMiNg SWITCH TO LINUX NOW ^idiot<|eor|><|sor|>Nonono, switch to jQuery. Use it as a JavaScript library. As a programming language. As an operating system. As a computer. As the meaning of life.
Use jQuery.
jQuery.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 217 |
programmerhumor | Bip901 | fwgemdx | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The version I heard years ago is that if you just ask for help with XYZ in Linux they'll tell you to RTFM. If you complain loudly that its *impossible* to do XYZ in Linux and its *so* simple in Windows, you will immediately have an army of Linux experts appear and give you detailed instructions on how to do XYZ in eleven different distros.<|eor|><|sor|>RTFM?<|eor|><|sor|>Read the f*cking manual<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 214 |
programmerhumor | carcigenicate | fwfu728 | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It isn't necessarily because "they just want to prove others wrong". Shutting down misinformation is important; especially today. If we had more people correcting bullshit, we'd be better off.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 164 |
programmerhumor | Not_Sugden | fwgl0zh | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>It's all fun and games until someone comments on your wrong answer saying that it worked for them.<|eor|><|sor|>YoU cAnT uSE WinDOwS wHilE pRogRAmMiNg SWITCH TO LINUX NOW ^idiot<|eor|><|sor|>Nonono, switch to jQuery. Use it as a JavaScript library. As a programming language. As an operating system. As a computer. As the meaning of life.
Use jQuery.
jQuery.<|eor|><|sor|>#$(this)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 159 |
programmerhumor | Noch_ein_Kamel | fwgfn07 | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The version I heard years ago is that if you just ask for help with XYZ in Linux they'll tell you to RTFM. If you complain loudly that its *impossible* to do XYZ in Linux and its *so* simple in Windows, you will immediately have an army of Linux experts appear and give you detailed instructions on how to do XYZ in eleven different distros.<|eor|><|sor|>RTFM?<|eor|><|sor|>Read the f*cking manual<|eor|><|sor|>He just tricked you into not having to google it. Lazy genius!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 153 |
programmerhumor | poopatroopa3 | fwg813p | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>This is known as [Cunningham's Law](https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham%27s_Law)<|eor|><|sor|>>[Cunningham](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_Cunningham) himself denies ownership of the law, calling it a "misquote that disproves itself by propagating through the internet."
The irony!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 141 |
programmerhumor | JavamonkYT | fwg89c0 | <|sols|><|sot|>I wish Id seen this years ago<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/uh6iyd3bdy751.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>This is known as [Cunningham's Law](https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cunningham%27s_Law)<|eor|><|sor|>You're supposed to say it's Muphry's Law or Occam's Razorblade so Albert Einstein can correct you with Cunningham's Law.<|eor|><|sor|>Technically that is not the correct procedure.<|eor|><|sor|>[deleted]<|eor|><|sor|>No, I think you're talking about Murphy's law.<|eor|><|sor|>No, Murphys law is that every action has an equal and opposite reaction.<|eor|><|sor|>No, I think that's from Newton's 3rd law.<|eor|><|sor|>Na bro, Newtons 3rd law is that a robot must not harm a human or allow a human to come to harm<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 140 |
programmerhumor | sambasil | gp92sx | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32,907 |
programmerhumor | LordTrython | frkgh01 | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Like, how did they do that ? It Makes my mind hurt.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,054 |
programmerhumor | firejak308 | frkm41l | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Like, how did they do that ? It Makes my mind hurt.<|eor|><|sor|>Data-oriented programming, bitmasks, smaller assets, and some other techniques I don't know about<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,896 |
programmerhumor | Rqoo51 | frkv8w0 | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Like, how did they do that ? It Makes my mind hurt.<|eor|><|sor|>Data-oriented programming, bitmasks, smaller assets, and some other techniques I don't know about<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah pretty much if you wanted to make a game in the past you had to figure out how use every ounce of memory you had. This includes reusing lots of stuff and figuring out tricks to save space. The sound of Mario getting hit and shrinking is the sound of going down a pipe, and clouds are bushes, the fact that you cant go backwards, etc.
Now that space is cheap devs dont have to try as hard and instead put effort into other stuff. Though there still have some limits.
The fact that Halo 4 runs on a Xbox 360 despite it being a toaster still blows my mind, but they are using lots of tricks they came up with during that generation.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 2,640 |
programmerhumor | human_tree | frkzpbj | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Like, how did they do that ? It Makes my mind hurt.<|eor|><|sor|>Data-oriented programming, bitmasks, smaller assets, and some other techniques I don't know about<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah pretty much if you wanted to make a game in the past you had to figure out how use every ounce of memory you had. This includes reusing lots of stuff and figuring out tricks to save space. The sound of Mario getting hit and shrinking is the sound of going down a pipe, and clouds are bushes, the fact that you cant go backwards, etc.
Now that space is cheap devs dont have to try as hard and instead put effort into other stuff. Though there still have some limits.
The fact that Halo 4 runs on a Xbox 360 despite it being a toaster still blows my mind, but they are using lots of tricks they came up with during that generation.<|eor|><|sor|>The Xbox 360 has 512Mb of RAM.<|eor|><|sor|>Just like a toaster.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,717 |
programmerhumor | Wi11owwo1f | frkxn2z | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Like, how did they do that ? It Makes my mind hurt.<|eor|><|sor|>Data-oriented programming, bitmasks, smaller assets, and some other techniques I don't know about<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah pretty much if you wanted to make a game in the past you had to figure out how use every ounce of memory you had. This includes reusing lots of stuff and figuring out tricks to save space. The sound of Mario getting hit and shrinking is the sound of going down a pipe, and clouds are bushes, the fact that you cant go backwards, etc.
Now that space is cheap devs dont have to try as hard and instead put effort into other stuff. Though there still have some limits.
The fact that Halo 4 runs on a Xbox 360 despite it being a toaster still blows my mind, but they are using lots of tricks they came up with during that generation.<|eor|><|sor|>The Xbox 360 has 512Mb of RAM.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,406 |
programmerhumor | code_turtle | frklxmd | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Why is COD 100GB for real tho
Edit: I was referring to COD Warzone, sorry for being vague!<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,197 |
programmerhumor | MrMathemagician | frkmuet | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>are you implying that cod was coded in JS lol<|eor|><|sor|>It was likely written in C#, which is basically Java. So you know, it was therefore basically written in Javascript. /s<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 813 |
programmerhumor | jw-by | frl034v | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Like, how did they do that ? It Makes my mind hurt.<|eor|><|sor|>Data-oriented programming, bitmasks, smaller assets, and some other techniques I don't know about<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah pretty much if you wanted to make a game in the past you had to figure out how use every ounce of memory you had. This includes reusing lots of stuff and figuring out tricks to save space. The sound of Mario getting hit and shrinking is the sound of going down a pipe, and clouds are bushes, the fact that you cant go backwards, etc.
Now that space is cheap devs dont have to try as hard and instead put effort into other stuff. Though there still have some limits.
The fact that Halo 4 runs on a Xbox 360 despite it being a toaster still blows my mind, but they are using lots of tricks they came up with during that generation.<|eor|><|sor|>The Xbox 360 has 512Mb of RAM.<|eor|><|sor|>Just like a toaster.<|eor|><|sor|>Honestly I think my smart toaster has more ram than that.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 741 |
programmerhumor | river226 | frks2ms | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>This misses the actually impressive feat in gold/silver where the devs managed to optimize and compresses so well that not only was the national dex idea established, but they were able to do 2 whole regions. Something they had to bring outside help into to do, all while using a cart designed to look good on both original and color game boys. That's a real feat of efficient design.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 710 |
programmerhumor | arm_is_king | frko9p6 | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Why is COD 100GB for real tho
Edit: I was referring to COD Warzone, sorry for being vague!<|eor|><|sor|>Assets used to be duplicated and not instanced so that Hard Drives could load the whole map continuously, instead of searching around for the model to put in a part of a level. Basically, it made the game load faster but sacrificed Storage Space to do so. Next gen consoles will have SSDs by default, meaning more instancing and smaller game sizes.
Edit: ~~but mainly it's uncompressed high res textures. Uncompressed because, again, loading times.~~ This is wrong, they do have them compressed, file size is large in spite of that.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 641 |
programmerhumor | immaelox | frkltgw | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>are you implying that cod was coded in JS lol<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 582 |
programmerhumor | NakedMermaid | frkw77a | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Super Mario Bros. for NES was 31KB there is also a super small 3D shooter called .kkrieger that is only 98KB and looks pretty good for that.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 462 |
programmerhumor | The_Shell_Bullet | frku0nm | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>This misses the actually impressive feat in gold/silver where the devs managed to optimize and compresses so well that not only was the national dex idea established, but they were able to do 2 whole regions. Something they had to bring outside help into to do, all while using a cart designed to look good on both original and color game boys. That's a real feat of efficient design.<|eor|><|sor|>The help was Iwata himself.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 372 |
programmerhumor | tinydonuts | frl16ni | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Like, how did they do that ? It Makes my mind hurt.<|eor|><|sor|>Data-oriented programming, bitmasks, smaller assets, and some other techniques I don't know about<|eor|><|sor|>Yeah pretty much if you wanted to make a game in the past you had to figure out how use every ounce of memory you had. This includes reusing lots of stuff and figuring out tricks to save space. The sound of Mario getting hit and shrinking is the sound of going down a pipe, and clouds are bushes, the fact that you cant go backwards, etc.
Now that space is cheap devs dont have to try as hard and instead put effort into other stuff. Though there still have some limits.
The fact that Halo 4 runs on a Xbox 360 despite it being a toaster still blows my mind, but they are using lots of tricks they came up with during that generation.<|eor|><|sor|>The Xbox 360 has 512Mb of RAM.<|eor|><|sor|>Just like a toaster.<|eor|><|sor|>Honestly I think my smart toaster has more ram than that.<|eor|><|sor|>Is that why my smart toaster crashes when I try to toast something and look at the weather at the same time?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 353 |
programmerhumor | immaelox | frkmvzc | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>are you implying that cod was coded in JS lol<|eor|><|sor|>It was likely written in C#, which is basically Java. So you know, it was therefore basically written in Javascript. /s<|eor|><|sor|>oh yeah, this is big brain time<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 313 |
programmerhumor | arm_is_king | frkqi8s | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Why is COD 100GB for real tho
Edit: I was referring to COD Warzone, sorry for being vague!<|eor|><|sor|>Assets used to be duplicated and not instanced so that Hard Drives could load the whole map continuously, instead of searching around for the model to put in a part of a level. Basically, it made the game load faster but sacrificed Storage Space to do so. Next gen consoles will have SSDs by default, meaning more instancing and smaller game sizes.
Edit: ~~but mainly it's uncompressed high res textures. Uncompressed because, again, loading times.~~ This is wrong, they do have them compressed, file size is large in spite of that.<|eor|><|sor|>Wait what?<|eor|><|sor|>*Edit: This isn't the best example, check out the child comments for more specific instances where this increases performance.*
For instance, if you have a model of a desk. And you have a level that has 50 identical desks in it (say, inside an office). When exporting the level file, often they will bake the models into the level, meaning the data for the desk will be included 50 times. This is so the level can be loaded continuously.
If, instead, they had one desk model, and the level contained references to that model, then when loading the level the hard disk would have to go back and forth loading the level and the desk model. They could be in different physical locations on the hard disk, meaning slower loading time and more stutters.
SSDs don't suffer from this, because you can do random access with no speed penalty, so games are starting to use intances of models instead of baking them in.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 308 |
programmerhumor | Kered13 | frkuli5 | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Like, how did they do that ? It Makes my mind hurt.<|eor|><|sor|>Data-oriented programming, bitmasks, smaller assets, and some other techniques I don't know about<|eor|><|sor|>More like unoriented programming. Programming paradigms weren't a widely used concept back then, especially when programmers were still writing directly in assembly like on the Gameboy.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 289 |
programmerhumor | Kered13 | frkuupk | <|sols|><|sot|>Any unused storage is wasted storage<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.imgur.com/WAUqDQB.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>are you implying that cod was coded in JS lol<|eor|><|sor|>It was likely written in C#, which is basically Java. So you know, it was therefore basically written in Javascript. /s<|eor|><|sor|>Jokes aside, CoD is written in C++. It's built on a heavily modified Quake engine. There may be some C# components, but the majority of the code is probably still C++ and certainly all of the heavy lifting components.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 279 |
programmerhumor | pa_russki | eqblul | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32,888 |
programmerhumor | Tsu_Dho_Namh | fepuh0f | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Unless the machines use a genetic algorithm. Fight imaginary battles against itself over and over until it starts coming up with strategies all its own.
Like when OpenAI beat the world's best Dota 2 players. It was doing things like purposely taking a lot of damage early on to bait the human opponent out of position. Laying a trap for them.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 3,122 |
programmerhumor | Bainos | feq3m66 | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Unless the machines use a genetic algorithm. Fight imaginary battles against itself over and over until it starts coming up with strategies all its own.
Like when OpenAI beat the world's best Dota 2 players. It was doing things like purposely taking a lot of damage early on to bait the human opponent out of position. Laying a trap for them.<|eor|><|sor|>Link for the lazy: https://openai.com/blog/more-on-dota-2/.
I don't understand how the bot learned to bait humans if it was eventually playing with itself in order to learn? Since it isn't a human it shouldn't fall for that, and thus it shouldn't learn that trick by playing against an earlier version of itself, I'm thinking. I don't doubt it, but I'd love some really basic explanation from somebody smart :)<|eor|><|sor|>Essentially the game was playing a version that can fall into baits, against a version that tries to bait. It can happen that the agent never ended up learning how to differentiate bait from misplays.
Also, keep in mind that it's a machine, not a human. So it can learn to bait its opponent without learning not to get baited itself, due to the lack of deductive reasoning.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 880 |
programmerhumor | jD91mZM2 | feq16b9 | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Unless the machines use a genetic algorithm. Fight imaginary battles against itself over and over until it starts coming up with strategies all its own.
Like when OpenAI beat the world's best Dota 2 players. It was doing things like purposely taking a lot of damage early on to bait the human opponent out of position. Laying a trap for them.<|eor|><|sor|>Link for the lazy: https://openai.com/blog/more-on-dota-2/.
I don't understand how the bot learned to bait humans if it was eventually playing with itself in order to learn? Since it isn't a human it shouldn't fall for that, and thus it shouldn't learn that trick by playing against an earlier version of itself, I'm thinking. I don't doubt it, but I'd love some really basic explanation from somebody smart :)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 858 |
programmerhumor | protestor | feq79ec | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Unless the machines use a genetic algorithm. Fight imaginary battles against itself over and over until it starts coming up with strategies all its own.
Like when OpenAI beat the world's best Dota 2 players. It was doing things like purposely taking a lot of damage early on to bait the human opponent out of position. Laying a trap for them.<|eor|><|sor|>Link for the lazy: https://openai.com/blog/more-on-dota-2/.
I don't understand how the bot learned to bait humans if it was eventually playing with itself in order to learn? Since it isn't a human it shouldn't fall for that, and thus it shouldn't learn that trick by playing against an earlier version of itself, I'm thinking. I don't doubt it, but I'd love some really basic explanation from somebody smart :)<|eor|><|sor|>Essentially the game was playing a version that can fall into baits, against a version that tries to bait. It can happen that the agent never ended up learning how to differentiate bait from misplays.
Also, keep in mind that it's a machine, not a human. So it can learn to bait its opponent without learning not to get baited itself, due to the lack of deductive reasoning.<|eor|><|sor|>>
>
> Also, keep in mind that it's a machine, not a human. So it can learn to bait its opponent without learning not to get baited itself, due to the lack of deductive reasoning.
Hey! There's a subfield of IA that's about using deductive reasoning to infer new knowledge! It turns out that logical reasoning can be automated, but picking the right logic to use is tricky.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inference_engine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasoning_system
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_reasoning<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 422 |
programmerhumor | JamInTheJar | fepuq59 | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Unless the machines use a genetic algorithm. Fight imaginary battles against itself over and over until it starts coming up with strategies all its own.
Like when OpenAI beat the world's best Dota 2 players. It was doing things like purposely taking a lot of damage early on to bait the human opponent out of position. Laying a trap for them.<|eor|><|sor|>That's... pretty scary, actually.
Slap that in r/ScaryTechnology, it has a lot of potential implications...<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 400 |
programmerhumor | jberm123 | feq1fxr | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>But that means the vast majority of battle-losers also used pre-modern weaponry. What a terrible algorithm<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 350 |
programmerhumor | electricalm | fepvmq5 | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>AI would use religion as a weapon, then.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 258 |
programmerhumor | WikiTextBot | feq7amj | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Unless the machines use a genetic algorithm. Fight imaginary battles against itself over and over until it starts coming up with strategies all its own.
Like when OpenAI beat the world's best Dota 2 players. It was doing things like purposely taking a lot of damage early on to bait the human opponent out of position. Laying a trap for them.<|eor|><|sor|>Link for the lazy: https://openai.com/blog/more-on-dota-2/.
I don't understand how the bot learned to bait humans if it was eventually playing with itself in order to learn? Since it isn't a human it shouldn't fall for that, and thus it shouldn't learn that trick by playing against an earlier version of itself, I'm thinking. I don't doubt it, but I'd love some really basic explanation from somebody smart :)<|eor|><|sor|>Essentially the game was playing a version that can fall into baits, against a version that tries to bait. It can happen that the agent never ended up learning how to differentiate bait from misplays.
Also, keep in mind that it's a machine, not a human. So it can learn to bait its opponent without learning not to get baited itself, due to the lack of deductive reasoning.<|eor|><|sor|>>
>
> Also, keep in mind that it's a machine, not a human. So it can learn to bait its opponent without learning not to get baited itself, due to the lack of deductive reasoning.
Hey! There's a subfield of IA that's about using deductive reasoning to infer new knowledge! It turns out that logical reasoning can be automated, but picking the right logic to use is tricky.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inference_engine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasoning_system
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automated_reasoning<|eor|><|sor|>**Inference engine**
In the field of Artificial Intelligence, inference engine is a component of the system that applies logical rules to the knowledge base to deduce new information. The first inference engines were components of expert systems. The typical expert system consisted of a knowledge base and an inference engine. The knowledge base stored facts about the world.
***
**Reasoning system**
In information technology a reasoning system is a software system that generates conclusions from available knowledge using logical techniques such as deduction and induction. Reasoning systems play an important role in the implementation of artificial intelligence and knowledge-based systems.
By the everyday usage definition of the phrase, all computer systems are reasoning systems in that they all automate some type of logic or decision. In typical use in the Information Technology field however, the phrase is usually reserved for systems that perform more complex kinds of reasoning.
***
**Automated reasoning**
Automated reasoning is an area of cognitive science (involves knowledge representation and reasoning) and metalogic dedicated to understanding different aspects of reasoning. The study of automated reasoning helps produce computer programs that allow computers to reason completely, or nearly completely, automatically. Although automated reasoning is considered a sub-field of artificial intelligence, it also has connections with theoretical computer science, and even philosophy.
The most developed subareas of automated reasoning are automated theorem proving (and the less automated but more pragmatic subfield of interactive theorem proving) and automated proof checking (viewed as guaranteed correct reasoning under fixed assumptions).
***
^[ [^PM](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose?to=kittens_from_space) ^| [^Exclude ^me](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiTextBot&message=Excludeme&subject=Excludeme) ^| [^Exclude ^from ^subreddit](https://np.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/about/banned) ^| [^FAQ ^/ ^Information](https://np.reddit.com/r/WikiTextBot/wiki/index) ^| [^Source](https://github.com/kittenswolf/WikiTextBot) ^]
^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 183 |
programmerhumor | dreamerforeverps4 | fepr865 | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Bad feature engineering.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 164 |
programmerhumor | mikewirkijowski | feqqbwe | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>But that means the vast majority of battle-losers also used pre-modern weaponry. What a terrible algorithm<|eor|><|sor|>Im pretty sure the vast majority of battle-winners used the most modern technology available at the time, but then its just a joke.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 154 |
programmerhumor | Astrofringered_lawn | feq9me5 | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>I'll just leave another comment here linking to the original author and source since OP neglected to do so.
[/u/MrWeiner](https://www.reddit.com/u/MrWeiner/)
[https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/rise-of-the-machines](https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/rise-of-the-machines)<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 105 |
programmerhumor | ReallyHadToFixThat | fepxlw7 | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Unless the machines use a genetic algorithm. Fight imaginary battles against itself over and over until it starts coming up with strategies all its own.
Like when OpenAI beat the world's best Dota 2 players. It was doing things like purposely taking a lot of damage early on to bait the human opponent out of position. Laying a trap for them.<|eor|><|sor|>IIRC it had perfect knowledge though, so a major advantage over regular players.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 93 |
programmerhumor | Bainos | feq3cdd | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Unless the machines use a genetic algorithm. Fight imaginary battles against itself over and over until it starts coming up with strategies all its own.
Like when OpenAI beat the world's best Dota 2 players. It was doing things like purposely taking a lot of damage early on to bait the human opponent out of position. Laying a trap for them.<|eor|><|sor|>IIRC it had perfect knowledge though, so a major advantage over regular players.<|eor|><|sor|>Did it ? The AlphaStar agent from DeepMind (for Starcraft 2) had normal map visibility and capped inputs per second, and still managed to get to top player level.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 85 |
programmerhumor | JoshRichardson4MVP | feptx96 | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>The romans waged war to gather slaves and wealth. Spain built an empire from its lust for gold and territory. Hitler shaped a battered Germany into an economic superpower. But war never changes.<|eor|><|sor|>And America spends trillions to stabilize the oil market.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 76 |
programmerhumor | vbevan | feqs5bg | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Unless the machines use a genetic algorithm. Fight imaginary battles against itself over and over until it starts coming up with strategies all its own.
Like when OpenAI beat the world's best Dota 2 players. It was doing things like purposely taking a lot of damage early on to bait the human opponent out of position. Laying a trap for them.<|eor|><|sor|>Link for the lazy: https://openai.com/blog/more-on-dota-2/.
I don't understand how the bot learned to bait humans if it was eventually playing with itself in order to learn? Since it isn't a human it shouldn't fall for that, and thus it shouldn't learn that trick by playing against an earlier version of itself, I'm thinking. I don't doubt it, but I'd love some really basic explanation from somebody smart :)<|eor|><|sor|>Essentially the game was playing a version that can fall into baits, against a version that tries to bait. It can happen that the agent never ended up learning how to differentiate bait from misplays.
Also, keep in mind that it's a machine, not a human. So it can learn to bait its opponent without learning not to get baited itself, due to the lack of deductive reasoning.<|eor|><|sor|>Hmm in my undergrad course of AI last quarter, my Prof said how such non-optimal moves that serves as a bait is considered as a bad move.<|eor|><|sor|>If it's stupid and it works, it's not stupid.
Your professor sounds like the sort of person who forgets most systems contain humans. If you have a perfectly spherical cow in a vacuum, it's fine, but non-optimal moves aren't bad. They're a risk that can itself be computed and assigned a value.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 74 |
programmerhumor | gesocks | fepyoec | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Unless the machines use a genetic algorithm. Fight imaginary battles against itself over and over until it starts coming up with strategies all its own.
Like when OpenAI beat the world's best Dota 2 players. It was doing things like purposely taking a lot of damage early on to bait the human opponent out of position. Laying a trap for them.<|eor|><|sor|>IIRC it had perfect knowledge though, so a major advantage over regular players.<|eor|><|sor|>just like in a real Robot uprising when they can use all our phones to Track each of their human ememys live<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 73 |
programmerhumor | Bainos | feqv21w | <|sols|><|sot|>War...war never changes<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/hb2n8l3yogb41.jpg<|eol|><|sor|>Unless the machines use a genetic algorithm. Fight imaginary battles against itself over and over until it starts coming up with strategies all its own.
Like when OpenAI beat the world's best Dota 2 players. It was doing things like purposely taking a lot of damage early on to bait the human opponent out of position. Laying a trap for them.<|eor|><|sor|>Link for the lazy: https://openai.com/blog/more-on-dota-2/.
I don't understand how the bot learned to bait humans if it was eventually playing with itself in order to learn? Since it isn't a human it shouldn't fall for that, and thus it shouldn't learn that trick by playing against an earlier version of itself, I'm thinking. I don't doubt it, but I'd love some really basic explanation from somebody smart :)<|eor|><|sor|>Essentially the game was playing a version that can fall into baits, against a version that tries to bait. It can happen that the agent never ended up learning how to differentiate bait from misplays.
Also, keep in mind that it's a machine, not a human. So it can learn to bait its opponent without learning not to get baited itself, due to the lack of deductive reasoning.<|eor|><|sor|>Hmm in my undergrad course of AI last quarter, my Prof said how such non-optimal moves that serves as a bait is considered as a bad move.<|eor|><|sor|>It depends on what's your value function.
A non-optimal move will be considered a bad move if your horizon is bounded short, i.e. if you look at the value of the board immediately after taking an action.
However, if your horizon is far enough, e.g. with a deep exploration minimax or reinforcement learning that looks at the final result of the game as its reward, then the move will be considered good if the opponent falls for it (since the value function observes that the opponent is now in a bad situation).
Most likely your professor was referring to a specific class of algorithms (maybe a search based one, as those are the most common algorithms to study in undergrad), but his warnings do not apply to more advanced solutions which were developed to avoid this kind of pitfall.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 65 |
programmerhumor | x_Jet007 | j3ofac | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32,890 |
programmerhumor | Umm_NOPE | g7dndhh | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>3 hours? Look at this speed demon over here.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 1,555 |
programmerhumor | raedr7n | g7dnkni | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>I don't have such weaknesses. My code never gives me errors, because I have the best strategy for avoiding bugs. I sit down, write all the code in one go, and never test it. If you never try to _use_ or _compile_ it, you will never experience errors. I live by the idea that any obstacle can be removed by operating under the assumption that it doesn't exist. In this way, I am the ultimate programmer. You can be too. For the low low price of 30 installments of $1,500, attend my hybrid coding/philosophy/wolf-training boot camp and become educated in the greatest way.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 785 |
programmerhumor | KradeSmith | g7dzf11 | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>3 hours? Look at this speed demon over here.<|eor|><|sor|>Obviously meant days<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 350 |
programmerhumor | bread_berries | g7dm8md | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>This is why I keep doing Arduino projects. Code finally running is great, but.... code finally running and *making a physical object move* is like cocaine.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 222 |
programmerhumor | SteezyCougar | g7dzs50 | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>3 hours? Look at this speed demon over here.<|eor|><|sor|>Obviously meant days<|eor|><|sor|>Errr.... Yeah days. Definitely not like 3 weeks or anything<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 215 |
programmerhumor | YellowOnline | g7ddepc | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>Yes. Still prefer sex though. I'm not a masochist.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 191 |
programmerhumor | sum-catnip | g7dvzpw | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>I don't have such weaknesses. My code never gives me errors, because I have the best strategy for avoiding bugs. I sit down, write all the code in one go, and never test it. If you never try to _use_ or _compile_ it, you will never experience errors. I live by the idea that any obstacle can be removed by operating under the assumption that it doesn't exist. In this way, I am the ultimate programmer. You can be too. For the low low price of 30 installments of $1,500, attend my hybrid coding/philosophy/wolf-training boot camp and become educated in the greatest way.<|eor|><|sor|>Wait, what?
You mean your IDE is giving you squiggly red lines?
Please sir update your bootcamp material to not use an IDE and just take my money.<|eor|><|sor|>The red lines mean your code is on fire<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 188 |
programmerhumor | XFMR | g7ditbu | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>Im not a programmer but was once tasked with overhauling an assessment and metrics program. I had to build an excel file from scratch that compared a bunch of different time standards for each individual piece of work we did each year. The problem was I had absolutely no idea how to use excel. I basically taught myself how to use it over the course of a few days. I think the hardest part was getting excel to convert the way we wrote our time stamps over to a format excel recognizes. that took a few hours of trial and error before it finally worked. I was so excited when it finally did I had to show the guy I was working with who asked what happens when time zone changes? Took me a whole day to get it to work with time zone changes and GMT. But I did it and my final version is the one they still use a year later.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 187 |
programmerhumor | TuriSabries | g7dvhoz | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>I don't have such weaknesses. My code never gives me errors, because I have the best strategy for avoiding bugs. I sit down, write all the code in one go, and never test it. If you never try to _use_ or _compile_ it, you will never experience errors. I live by the idea that any obstacle can be removed by operating under the assumption that it doesn't exist. In this way, I am the ultimate programmer. You can be too. For the low low price of 30 installments of $1,500, attend my hybrid coding/philosophy/wolf-training boot camp and become educated in the greatest way.<|eor|><|sor|>Wait, what?
You mean your IDE is giving you squiggly red lines?
Please sir update your bootcamp material to not use an IDE and just take my money.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 178 |
programmerhumor | ShadoWolf | g7dkq48 | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>Im not a programmer but was once tasked with overhauling an assessment and metrics program. I had to build an excel file from scratch that compared a bunch of different time standards for each individual piece of work we did each year. The problem was I had absolutely no idea how to use excel. I basically taught myself how to use it over the course of a few days. I think the hardest part was getting excel to convert the way we wrote our time stamps over to a format excel recognizes. that took a few hours of trial and error before it finally worked. I was so excited when it finally did I had to show the guy I was working with who asked what happens when time zone changes? Took me a whole day to get it to work with time zone changes and GMT. But I did it and my final version is the one they still use a year later.<|eor|><|sor|>This sounds so damn horrible. Like most professional programmers don't go near Time & Date code unless there a well-established library between them and whatever they're manipulating. Because they're just so many damn edge cases.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 129 |
programmerhumor | RMP777 | g7e39vh | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>3 hours? Look at this speed demon over here.<|eor|><|sor|>Obviously meant days<|eor|><|sor|>Errr.... Yeah days. Definitely not like 3 weeks or anything<|eor|><|sor|>Definitely not three years or anything ridiculous working on a failed project or anything like that<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 129 |
programmerhumor | Actius | g7e4sp6 | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>This is why I keep doing Arduino projects. Code finally running is great, but.... code finally running and *making a physical object move* is like cocaine.<|eor|><|sor|>Arduino compiles and loads successfully
me: It's happening..!!
LED starts blinking
me: **JESUS WEPT**<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 123 |
programmerhumor | NotYourIT | g7e4kuw | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>3 hours? Look at this speed demon over here.<|eor|><|sor|>Obviously meant days<|eor|><|sor|>Errr.... Yeah days. Definitely not like 3 weeks or anything<|eor|><|sor|>Definitely not three years or anything ridiculous working on a failed project or anything like that<|eor|><|sor|>Wait, you guys got it to work already?<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 104 |
programmerhumor | Ailiam | g7de737 | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>Yes. Still prefer sex though. I'm not a masochist.<|eor|><|sor|>Yet.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 85 |
programmerhumor | ijue | g7dtgn0 | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>3 hours only?
Hahahaha
Ha ha
*crying*<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 77 |
programmerhumor | Disastrophi | g7dy9dd | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>I don't have such weaknesses. My code never gives me errors, because I have the best strategy for avoiding bugs. I sit down, write all the code in one go, and never test it. If you never try to _use_ or _compile_ it, you will never experience errors. I live by the idea that any obstacle can be removed by operating under the assumption that it doesn't exist. In this way, I am the ultimate programmer. You can be too. For the low low price of 30 installments of $1,500, attend my hybrid coding/philosophy/wolf-training boot camp and become educated in the greatest way.<|eor|><|sor|>Wait, what?
You mean your IDE is giving you squiggly red lines?
Please sir update your bootcamp material to not use an IDE and just take my money.<|eor|><|sor|>The red lines mean your code is on fire<|eor|><|sor|>Or that it should be.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 75 |
programmerhumor | MCMC_to_Serfdom | g7dq311 | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>Yes. Still prefer sex though. I'm not a masochist.<|eor|><|sor|>No one said these things can't be combined.
For added fun, get your spouse to roleplay a manager who interrupts you every 10 minutes to introduce a requirement change.<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 74 |
programmerhumor | jpff99 | g7dzye2 | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>3 hours? Look at this speed demon over here.<|eor|><|sor|>It was a "hello world" project<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 73 |
programmerhumor | SENIKolla | g7dwp4g | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>I don't have such weaknesses. My code never gives me errors, because I have the best strategy for avoiding bugs. I sit down, write all the code in one go, and never test it. If you never try to _use_ or _compile_ it, you will never experience errors. I live by the idea that any obstacle can be removed by operating under the assumption that it doesn't exist. In this way, I am the ultimate programmer. You can be too. For the low low price of 30 installments of $1,500, attend my hybrid coding/philosophy/wolf-training boot camp and become educated in the greatest way.<|eor|><|sor|>Wait, what?
You mean your IDE is giving you squiggly red lines?
Please sir update your bootcamp material to not use an IDE and just take my money.<|eor|><|sor|>IDE? Why? Use notepad<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 59 |
programmerhumor | T-Dark_ | g7dx86v | <|sols|><|sot|>I'm sure we can all relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/1o4b9m8x4mq51.png<|eol|><|sor|>I don't have such weaknesses. My code never gives me errors, because I have the best strategy for avoiding bugs. I sit down, write all the code in one go, and never test it. If you never try to _use_ or _compile_ it, you will never experience errors. I live by the idea that any obstacle can be removed by operating under the assumption that it doesn't exist. In this way, I am the ultimate programmer. You can be too. For the low low price of 30 installments of $1,500, attend my hybrid coding/philosophy/wolf-training boot camp and become educated in the greatest way.<|eor|><|sor|>Wait, what?
You mean your IDE is giving you squiggly red lines?
Please sir update your bootcamp material to not use an IDE and just take my money.<|eor|><|sor|>IDE? Why? Use notepad<|eor|><|sor|>No, use MS Word<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 50 |
programmerhumor | ThatManOfCulture | vc3gua | <|sols|><|sot|>Who else can relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/xw1suxqp8l591.gif<|eol|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 32,867 |
programmerhumor | Louismash99 | icbzo2f | <|sols|><|sot|>Who else can relate<|eot|><|sol|>https://i.redd.it/xw1suxqp8l591.gif<|eol|><|sor|>I'm in this gif and I don't like it<|eor|><|eols|><|endoftext|> | 670 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.